From owner-freebsd-testing@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 22 23:57:04 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-testing@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9CC85734 for ; Sun, 22 Feb 2015 23:57:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 83039969 for ; Sun, 22 Feb 2015 23:57:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t1MNv48G009152 for ; Sun, 22 Feb 2015 23:57:04 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-testing@freebsd.org Subject: [Bug 197861] [jenkins] usr.sbin.pw.pw_useradd:user_add_password_expiration_date_relative failed Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2015 23:57:04 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: tests X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0-CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: ngie@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: brd@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-testing@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Testing on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2015 23:57:04 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197861 --- Comment #2 from Garrett Cooper,425-314-3911 --- Frequency: https://jenkins.freebsd.org/job/FreeBSD_HEAD-tests2/743/testReport/junit/usr.sbin.pw/pw_useradd/user_add_account_expiration_date_relative/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. From owner-freebsd-testing@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 23 20:56:07 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-testing@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 56411399 for ; Mon, 23 Feb 2015 20:56:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-la0-x229.google.com (mail-la0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CE639D8C for ; Mon, 23 Feb 2015 20:56:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by labgm9 with SMTP id gm9so21399552lab.2 for ; Mon, 23 Feb 2015 12:56:05 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=7qa2WkhHPomRlm1wtnROQGNeTgQUKlj1WvoABWYTGkE=; b=vRpozRieozTSlyXCnOEk0jaCGQI4LIzQMxlfzwJrqhlaw3cawLHXBfxEfSS9VJ9hn+ gJGgjgYLwEttxZsLIIYnhOLH06/IWQLDq9vG/a2+mivo4MmgqHabTDZNGyPpiuof3DDt bpYQJOFUTFH2GFkE0EtWJ18PvVxzgafHBG/53eNEdOOtmStMygkd8h9HL+j9lH9f2WIv 5a1ORvVQDq5SXWR/mWa0daBhAD/L3Xy4w6VEylp8INuTmedQJl53VEXasC2zXFpabnE5 gckW8zo0C/E5HdLGX4v13Wd7FS6D1+pnDy6w+DJWny3VgvgQ3Z5TJV9Bloypjc6w7G1g iskg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.115.169 with SMTP id jp9mr11534611lab.121.1424724964936; Mon, 23 Feb 2015 12:56:04 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.114.78.131 with HTTP; Mon, 23 Feb 2015 12:56:04 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 15:56:04 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: "h_memcpy: stack overflow detected; terminated" while running test suite From: Ryan Stone To: freebsd-testing@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-testing@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Testing on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 20:56:07 -0000 When I run the FreeBSD test suite with the following command: kyua test -k /usr/tests/Kyuafile I see the following printed to the console of my machine (running head circa Friday): maxproc limit exceeded by uid 977 (pid 34272); see tuning(7) and login.conf(5) Feb 23 20:50:19 h_fgets: stack overflow detected; terminated Feb 23 20:50:23 h_gets: stack overflow detected; terminated Feb 23 20:50:27 h_memcpy: stack overflow detected; terminated Feb 23 20:50:32 h_memmove: stack overflow detected; terminated Feb 23 20:50:36 h_memset: stack overflow detected; terminated Feb 23 20:50:40 h_read: stack overflow detected; terminated Feb 23 20:50:44 h_readlink: stack overflow detected; terminated Feb 23 20:50:48 h_snprintf: stack overflow detected; terminated Feb 23 20:50:52 h_sprintf: stack overflow detected; terminated Feb 23 20:50:56 h_stpcpy: stack overflow detected; terminated Feb 23 20:51:00 h_stpncpy: stack overflow detected; terminated Feb 23 20:51:05 h_strcat: stack overflow detected; terminated Feb 23 20:51:09 h_strcpy: stack overflow detected; terminated Feb 23 20:51:13 h_strncat: stack overflow detected; terminated Feb 23 20:51:17 h_strncpy: stack overflow detected; terminated Feb 23 20:51:21 h_vsnprintf: stack overflow detected; terminated Feb 23 20:51:25 h_vsprintf: stack overflow detected; terminated Is this normal? The tests are reported as passed but this seems very strange. From owner-freebsd-testing@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 23 20:57:27 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-testing@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B739400 for ; Mon, 23 Feb 2015 20:57:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-la0-x22d.google.com (mail-la0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E0FE0DA5 for ; Mon, 23 Feb 2015 20:57:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: by lamq1 with SMTP id q1so21237360lam.5 for ; Mon, 23 Feb 2015 12:57:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=xn9P4WVVmFgONGmQzFHQpdyMoE5NElEBrUqP68vKJMM=; b=X2Ifa1gkexy1sKcLfOyDjJw4wOf6Xud0qB25KyDMuXE0Fuu+PgfNTZ22H8HAuxwOWF cRlOskG/cGK7uv2siJa+IjR3Kd4u9vTE5hn7MyjdUPkOsIGFhD/5xosimXlcLOrLMHTj /O9AVbqBv9Xp7CCT3mespKmjx/SlvQwLO2F1a77dh7w4rwCsVXWYKQBEjEqAucaFzY26 AvsDJG6kppzx9qd8jMnsTSeKnTtejErc5QhGtmTTBSyRt7x9G+UPkt3T5Y9gfo/R+q0g OQoDu5qpzFrK2KMSkEiL0G+0mhP6CPyFfnZtZmLc6XB5DydN4NVB07ZeZIXmuEh/w6pG iwCg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.155.98 with SMTP id vv2mr11547735lbb.121.1424725044866; Mon, 23 Feb 2015 12:57:24 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.114.78.131 with HTTP; Mon, 23 Feb 2015 12:57:24 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 15:57:24 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: "h_memcpy: stack overflow detected; terminated" while running test suite From: Ryan Stone To: freebsd-testing@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-testing@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Testing on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 20:57:27 -0000 Never mind, false alarm. I just saw the full name of the test: lib/libc/ssp/ssp_test:sprintf SSP being stack smashing protection, of course. From owner-freebsd-testing@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 23 22:19:28 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-testing@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B7617FE6 for ; Mon, 23 Feb 2015 22:19:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ie0-x22d.google.com (mail-ie0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 866FE908 for ; Mon, 23 Feb 2015 22:19:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iecar1 with SMTP id ar1so27454497iec.0 for ; Mon, 23 Feb 2015 14:19:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=9oJuLEaOqXVZyGc6g0BdjNKPawLZcJ+l7uMG5aIhQrg=; b=tNUaRMWHmmiziHTAmlC74ZU46wnyXLPhFAo8iolkql5KoXT+zeUHTsi0WcQqp3g6bT 0GjKcWIOhTWOfWCwZnl3xDBUUbqadzcTVbo5DgbwGMgW3KpxvmY4a7HjMcNqrXwtrSfp urUj8B/3YGtjWXqlT4cVeuV26X62tpR+hXujAcW5hydvzUHyaLiBtLWyBY8mqJw90Sgc vhfCwjEiftRohH+nXCC+MtH2bqfNbkN6lYdkwN0lP4uwF/lY1mr+N5RNjOJmpN4x7oy/ qtbAHTXN7R4KBAFcv7w68NIa5GWSULpCYsnRHiTZw1nZD0a1iLig1ZxtN8KGz4bJv++k I/UA== X-Received: by 10.42.222.68 with SMTP id if4mr14123049icb.45.1424729967838; Mon, 23 Feb 2015 14:19:27 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: carpeddiem@gmail.com Received: by 10.107.158.19 with HTTP; Mon, 23 Feb 2015 14:19:07 -0800 (PST) From: Ed Maste Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 17:19:07 -0500 X-Google-Sender-Auth: wJNoHjd5RRFXfpAqYswa1D8yQ0A Message-ID: Subject: Running tests as a developer prior to commit To: Garrett Cooper Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: "freebsd-testing@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-testing@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Testing on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 22:19:28 -0000 In a discussion on -CURRENT from a test failure (Re: Jenkins build is still unstable: FreeBSD_HEAD-tests2 #740), On 21 February 2015 at 18:38, Garrett Cooper wrote: > > Not disguising stderr, here=E2=80=99s what pops up: > > $ sudo prove -v pgrep-j_test.sh > pgrep-j_test.sh .. > 1..3 > jls: unknown parameter: allow ... It's great the automated Jenkins runs caught this error and that it's now fixed. It'd be even better if we can facilitate simple runs of a suitable subset of tests prior to a commit. It looks like "make test" is close, despite the warnings it emits about being experimental. Is there a path we can take to support it, for at least a common case of developing and testing on a FreeBSD-CURRENT install? From owner-freebsd-testing@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 24 01:19:18 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-testing@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 972AF5E0 for ; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 01:19:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ig0-x235.google.com (mail-ig0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B0DAE04 for ; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 01:19:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ig0-f181.google.com with SMTP id hn18so23167644igb.2 for ; Mon, 23 Feb 2015 17:19:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=wEqIg8GQp2gPg8+tIPzBfu0UxRkIrNvzpwZLbJb5opc=; b=ATSn363f/R2RFBikA58I4DZuWbwlBJHgSh72Xa8y8Qb2+Zu/VbncSD6+0tPW53N9zl SQP+Lsm1/odGn9EIbtGE7ZLLcM7uIhAHehwGhywS04p3QtJ5Ppg+CWLwXNa8WuxEAtTT Y6iR0PWjpDhngXqJ4kMxba9zvXDhlOHR/+bAlixVntSGwCQvXtkpdD+eJfGm9Pop3rtw QfTXh1ZUP3zA9SpO64GMcEAWkN8wwAoaMwrMfcqhC/HHfMKczlnFkFqBYi6DhvuMsyZW 9cpd6NLv6l0fljmv2KFx56HLj29+340pg4BhWGNaYQpzw6UKttspTqHA6CXhHaUYh0G2 3GGA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.107.7 with SMTP id gy7mr16660625igb.49.1424740757818; Mon, 23 Feb 2015 17:19:17 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.50.104.202 with HTTP; Mon, 23 Feb 2015 17:19:17 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 17:19:17 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: "h_memcpy: stack overflow detected; terminated" while running test suite From: NGie Cooper To: Ryan Stone Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: "freebsd-testing@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-testing@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Testing on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 01:19:18 -0000 On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 12:57 PM, Ryan Stone wrote: > Never mind, false alarm. I just saw the full name of the test: > > lib/libc/ssp/ssp_test:sprintf > > SSP being stack smashing protection, of course. Yup :). From owner-freebsd-testing@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 24 02:37:30 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-testing@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3796AE29; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 02:37:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-la0-x22b.google.com (mail-la0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A94808C1; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 02:37:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: by labgq15 with SMTP id gq15so22978707lab.6; Mon, 23 Feb 2015 18:37:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=Sdse0+oqETE0LhSsYK+zUg0kd3ufyScfpZtUrk2V9Ak=; b=1AwV9/nNpc23boE0Ib1MH68dCqz/DhSGFFfV+5/fsZjGE7u3DHyAhFJqs4NpMY5Dlu B7vsJTc9O/KfbqgxFsfUmlbldOD9b+fG14L0YSvZ+pt6QjQlDcMldL1mElDdEgMIJMOZ W5J9LxkbhwpGILQGtvVEFKF58kp3BjnxTPjTXTMEPCsgqeuaxuPbfCs1iFHU5j/Bj/gg qc/Ff91t27qaAvaNYFTu0raDdN+TchdDGr4qhHkLk2AURuleomwqQgCd9rLebjVHB8GT eVsfo8vYTtnUnIZw5Q40YakmVeaogPrxcfMaRjOyZ+OblQVHSZ9EIlrGnl8eFKIqhZAG smpw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.204.197 with SMTP id la5mr6549019lbc.29.1424745447692; Mon, 23 Feb 2015 18:37:27 -0800 (PST) Sender: crodr001@gmail.com Received: by 10.112.82.164 with HTTP; Mon, 23 Feb 2015 18:37:27 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 18:37:27 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: KqupghcdnycrVZ0ftGGV_4rdpx0 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Running tests as a developer prior to commit From: Craig Rodrigues To: Ed Maste Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: "freebsd-testing@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-testing@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Testing on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 02:37:30 -0000 On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 2:19 PM, Ed Maste wrote: > > It'd be even better if we can facilitate simple runs of a > suitable subset of tests prior to a commit. It looks like "make test" > is close, despite the warnings it emits about being experimental. Is > there a path we can take to support it, for at least a common case of > developing and testing on a FreeBSD-CURRENT install? > On the surface, your request seems simple. However, I have seen the same request asked in multiple companies I have worked at, and it is not so simple. If someone touches an arbitrary piece of code in FreeBSD, what are the subset of tests that need to be run to validate the change? Some changes are very simple, and it is quite easy to extrapolate which tests need to be run. However, some changes are more subtle, and it is not so obvious which tests are affected. Having knowledge about what changes affect what unit tests requires almost an expert system to be built. The other suggestion I have seen in other companies is to require developers to run all unit tests for every change before they commit. This works to some extent, because in a company you can force this behavior. For FreeBSD, I think this will fail. We already have over 3000 tests under /usr/tests. It's not that hard to run them with "cd /usr/tests && kyua test". However, requiring FreeBSD developers to run these tests for every change they do is a big change in how they submit code to FreeBSD. This will probably result in rebellion. I would like to see a compromise solution. I would like an optional workflow, where someone does a pull request on the FreeBSD repository in GitHub, which then kicks off automation which builds an image, runs the kyua tests, and reports the results. After seeing these test results, the developer would still be responsible for manually committing the change to SVN. People who are OK with using GitHub can follow this workflow, and opt-in to the tests. People who hate git and GitHub can ignore it, and continue to commit directly to SVN as they do today. There are a whole lot of automation libraries built on top of Jenkins and GitHub which can facilitate this type of workflow. Projects like Mac Homebrew have very sophisticated workflows which kick off tests in response to pull requests. Someone in FreeBSD would need to build out this test infrastructure. It's doable, but a lot of work. It might be nice to make a Google Summer of Code project out of this. -- Craig From owner-freebsd-testing@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 24 03:20:32 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-testing@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A372AC5; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 03:20:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ig0-x22e.google.com (mail-ig0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E2B88E81; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 03:20:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ig0-f174.google.com with SMTP id b16so23653181igk.1; Mon, 23 Feb 2015 19:20:31 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=6xaMIBDpKr+EXXlYXEOQtdFGC5dtmrvOIHK4wPPDZws=; b=YOorTY5OxDeNMNhyMXGk8Um8xkMVXot2kR1UX2L/uzKkFYqMR/Vkze79NvtBjeTz89 FKaf5gH54dY+RkilrTyyJzOv14Yn3B4tLw3bRv9EGX94pOv+FXhZ5I7/GJMti5PnccaK jr1g4YdOxC+3tL4TIikGcDiU/E3Hgx+TVQe7Tmddqqdl6cZ0ZBpsKVQF8F7dqCji0PM0 aKsGyj/QISHFUlslyYTd+FdOOu3xWH4EmEeyAXmDyFQLgPwLTIg4FkzdDdA9P9iffLd1 I785jTljNua6GHXZX0IhrNfiwiKSwKEC4qN/b/3FxhNFclTNjXQoZbIxjvOSHj9HGEM7 AkHA== X-Received: by 10.50.111.168 with SMTP id ij8mr17453900igb.43.1424748031285; Mon, 23 Feb 2015 19:20:31 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: carpeddiem@gmail.com Received: by 10.107.158.19 with HTTP; Mon, 23 Feb 2015 19:20:11 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Ed Maste Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 22:20:11 -0500 X-Google-Sender-Auth: hYXM7QweYfZ9kVo_nm6oqDgx2Qw Message-ID: Subject: Re: Running tests as a developer prior to commit To: Craig Rodrigues Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: "freebsd-testing@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-testing@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Testing on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 03:20:32 -0000 On 23 February 2015 at 21:37, Craig Rodrigues wrote: > > If someone touches an arbitrary piece of code in FreeBSD, > what are the subset of tests that need to be run to validate the change? > Some changes are very simple, and it is quite easy to extrapolate which > tests need to be run. > > However, some changes are more subtle, and it is not so obvious which > tests are affected. Absolutely, but I'm not suggesting that we change the current setup, or avoid proceeding with other ideas you raise below. We'll still have the full test run from Jenkins if someone commits after running a chosen subset of tests. The use case I'm considering is someone making a change to a single binary under one of the bin directories, which has Kyua tests in its own subdirectory. My goal is to be able to: - run the test against the not-yet-installed tool built in $OBJDIR - report overall pass/failure and 0/non-0 return code (in addition to other output) - easily obtain stdout / stderr for failing tests to track down issues > The other suggestion I have seen in other companies is to require developers > to run all unit tests for every change before they commit. This works to > some > extent, because in a company you can force this behavior. > > For FreeBSD, I think this will fail. We already have over 3000 tests under > /usr/tests. > It's not that hard to run them with "cd /usr/tests && kyua test". > However, requiring FreeBSD developers to run these tests > for every change they do is a big change in how they submit code to FreeBSD. > This will probably result in rebellion. This is precisely why I'd like to find a way to make it easy to run a (rather small) subset of tests, if a developer desires to do so. The alternative is that they decide it's too awkward to run the tests, and just don't bother. Even in that case we're still better off today (since the Jenkins task will catch it) than we were some time ago before consistent test infrastructure existed. But it seems we ought to avoid the latency, mailing list churn, and masking effect of a broken test run if we can facilitate the developer running a set of tests that they've identified. > I would like to see a compromise solution. I would like an optional > workflow, > where someone does a pull request on the FreeBSD repository in GitHub, which > then > kicks off automation which builds an image, runs the kyua tests, and reports > the results. I think a project like this would be excellent to have, and I would personally make use of it. As you say it will be a lot of work, and it still introduces a great deal of latency over "make test" for a simple userland binary change. From owner-freebsd-testing@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 24 04:00:29 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-testing@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 87BA7827 for ; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 04:00:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx1.scaleengine.net (beauharnois2.bhs1.scaleengine.net [142.4.218.15]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45BCB1EC for ; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 04:00:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (Seawolf.HML3.ScaleEngine.net [209.51.186.28]) (Authenticated sender: allanjude.freebsd@scaleengine.com) by mx1.scaleengine.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D3C15942A4 for ; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 04:00:26 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <54EBF759.1060002@freebsd.org> Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 23:00:25 -0500 From: Allan Jude User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-testing@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Running tests as a developer prior to commit References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="JTVHIspjfKiFMUDuIE5nVIp4t3dxEMCuK" X-BeenThere: freebsd-testing@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Testing on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 04:00:29 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --JTVHIspjfKiFMUDuIE5nVIp4t3dxEMCuK Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2015-02-23 21:37, Craig Rodrigues wrote: > On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 2:19 PM, Ed Maste wrote: >=20 >> >> It'd be even better if we can facilitate simple runs of a >> suitable subset of tests prior to a commit. It looks like "make test" >> is close, despite the warnings it emits about being experimental. Is >> there a path we can take to support it, for at least a common case of >> developing and testing on a FreeBSD-CURRENT install? >> >=20 > On the surface, your request seems simple. > However, I have seen the same request asked in multiple companies > I have worked at, and it is not so simple. >=20 > If someone touches an arbitrary piece of code in FreeBSD, > what are the subset of tests that need to be run to validate the change= ? > Some changes are very simple, and it is quite easy to extrapolate which= > tests need to be run. >=20 > However, some changes are more subtle, and it is not so obvious which > tests are affected. >=20 > Having knowledge about what changes affect what unit tests requires alm= ost > an expert system to be built. >=20 > The other suggestion I have seen in other companies is to require devel= opers > to run all unit tests for every change before they commit. This works = to > some > extent, because in a company you can force this behavior. >=20 > For FreeBSD, I think this will fail. We already have over 3000 tests u= nder > /usr/tests. > It's not that hard to run them with "cd /usr/tests && kyua test". > However, requiring FreeBSD developers to run these tests > for every change they do is a big change in how they submit code to Fre= eBSD. > This will probably result in rebellion. >=20 > I would like to see a compromise solution. I would like an optional > workflow, > where someone does a pull request on the FreeBSD repository in GitHub, > which then > kicks off automation which builds an image, runs the kyua tests, and > reports the results. >=20 > After seeing these test results, the developer would still be responsib= le > for manually > committing the change to SVN. >=20 > People who are OK with using GitHub can follow this workflow, and opt-i= n to > the tests. > People who hate git and GitHub can ignore it, and continue to commit > directly to SVN > as they do today. >=20 > There are a whole lot of automation libraries built on top of Jenkins a= nd > GitHub > which can facilitate this type of workflow. Projects like Mac Homebrew= > have very > sophisticated workflows which kick off tests in response to pull reques= ts. >=20 > Someone in FreeBSD would need to build out this test infrastructure. I= t's > doable, but > a lot of work. It might be nice to make a Google Summer of Code projec= t > out of this. >=20 > -- > Craig > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-testing@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-testing > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-testing-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" >=20 Doesn't phabricator have some hooks to launch tests of a "proposed" patch? This could help catch the errors before they are committed --=20 Allan Jude --JTVHIspjfKiFMUDuIE5nVIp4t3dxEMCuK Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJU6/dcAAoJEJrBFpNRJZKf1R4P/iRdhxFXpOlNtQY1sBsaO4Ab AfX7P8GmYnPul82+Ee+8TcS3onvr71yassXCSu7v3IB6IDz7NXuRjfrpYxe14w8u vAEdqlAJ40dn6EqjwJEKerBYxO74Ke3C3FKWJdTpx7c8ej7C6uDev3QzAxRnDJjK IQg7Pivzoi7fGClPg2QqvbCZHsF5OIy5qA+bKgr4SoY41F1lJDPBRzjn2gOnpyU6 gLLqJAr42IbtmcWsqWsxRaHWyR/fNpXfRmgj7X3jKaxhgqBWdhluaoJaMi5HaPVq 2Zqy1stwCnfMNd6pKIr0yIHBb1gj2gWqNh/R2nS04PyllRf81oFPGvEQnWboyMSB b/d6Ib+z2Vz6cSlINznTB67OKnGg1zdvfPqYUBxJ7O2B/CUzQcdVM3CFH3Z8YCWV TF7hjVoO77bv93L1tGyZ0EhAupe5WMkvgs+dwy6CKiZe5Jc3H/rov6lPHipBDfda gkIptT0BpJmL4HVvhEGRpeoO8PsFNNq02ogjNhNFUxzqFdMNbButwll/KjmfvxIM raCAEh4AsDrKehgIt6hBBqNMlGoHl4Ygu8QYfV+FfKR1MdwR5ATTwzp+acfu+7f+ iURZnNI9Gc1YvFZK617LT1Nhw/2UQ/NXgq0W5T7aliJE/EYRLPT3Z6NtB3RrA6Xp WalRzzynHs1KxsV/FS6F =55X9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --JTVHIspjfKiFMUDuIE5nVIp4t3dxEMCuK-- From owner-freebsd-testing@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 24 05:55:11 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-testing@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BDDCBE16; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 05:55:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [IPv6:2001:470:1f05:b76::196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9D51EA2; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 05:55:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from AlfredMacbookAir.local (unknown [12.133.26.10]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2F85D341F90C; Mon, 23 Feb 2015 21:55:11 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <54EC1310.30509@freebsd.org> Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 00:58:40 -0500 From: Alfred Perlstein Organization: FreeBSD User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Allan Jude , freebsd-testing@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Running tests as a developer prior to commit References: <54EBF759.1060002@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <54EBF759.1060002@freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-testing@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Testing on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 05:55:11 -0000 On 2/23/15 11:00 PM, Allan Jude wrote: >> > > Doesn't phabricator have some hooks to launch tests of a "proposed" > patch? This could help catch the errors before they are committed > Yes we should hook that. -Alfred From owner-freebsd-testing@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 24 14:53:16 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-testing@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CDE23A51 for ; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 14:53:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B0C4B3A4 for ; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 14:53:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t1OErGNn017870 for ; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 14:53:16 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-testing@freebsd.org Subject: [Bug 197861] [jenkins] usr.sbin.pw.pw_useradd:user_add_password_expiration_date_relative failed Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 14:53:16 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: tests X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0-CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: brd@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: brd@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-testing@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Testing on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 14:53:16 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197861 --- Comment #3 from Brad Davis --- Thanks for opening the PR. I'll take a look. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. From owner-freebsd-testing@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 24 20:04:18 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-testing@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2684F73; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 20:04:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-lb0-x22f.google.com (mail-lb0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 53227ED0; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 20:04:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by lbvn10 with SMTP id n10so27465291lbv.6; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 12:04:16 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=XdDEVLkyixP+7WbpskNbP61uffrhtk0Jz9QgYSdzoOA=; b=E45hBWa3vc9a5kJYOG0jfyv7XQz4RoqG8PTy8iJ/wGPdTx/kEHKBVt0ZQBamu6cugb EJDm4NMjFLhL/SVbgVdvndvNHaLdjZ2yVJ0S51T+WNyBJBkA21s2C/89CdeL8yQLyKGA rXXmCRQa5E3Hrsacv3gnK6yCGUgjuPu3Dus464VQbdl3dwXSudr6YK2iD2xGWJbiGivc 9EKKH5Rz2GzKJ5Rd/XYOxYpipu2T1AjHXV7fV8g9ZECy98oLed/gzS5fQmTm8DwWU+OV 2Vf537Ge7gO33TYRGsthA4j+aHpiiFsJSHhj59kULN48+PpuIfJEJb0gbSeVsaGD3844 a5oA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.139.168 with SMTP id qz8mr15751332lbb.84.1424808256091; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 12:04:16 -0800 (PST) Sender: crodr001@gmail.com Received: by 10.112.82.164 with HTTP; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 12:04:15 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <54EC1310.30509@freebsd.org> References: <54EBF759.1060002@freebsd.org> <54EC1310.30509@freebsd.org> Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 12:04:15 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: URD1IMB2sDmkogcgd19VKeFAYuk Message-ID: Subject: Re: Running tests as a developer prior to commit From: Craig Rodrigues To: Alfred Perlstein Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: "freebsd-testing@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-testing@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Testing on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 20:04:19 -0000 On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 9:58 PM, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > > > On 2/23/15 11:00 PM, Allan Jude wrote: > > >>> >> Doesn't phabricator have some hooks to launch tests of a "proposed" >> patch? This could help catch the errors before they are committed >> >> > Yes we should hook that. > > There is a blog post which describes this type of workflow with Phabricator: http://www.dctrwatson.com/2013/01/jenkins-and-phabricator/ It's not like we need a magician or warlock to put this together, but somone has to write the code to do the integration. -- Craig From owner-freebsd-testing@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 24 21:16:51 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-testing@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2481FBC4; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 21:16:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [IPv6:2001:470:1f05:b76::196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03A8A973; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 21:16:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from AlfredMacbookAir.local (unknown [12.133.26.10]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7685F341F910; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 13:16:50 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <54ECEB17.2040804@freebsd.org> Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 16:20:23 -0500 From: Alfred Perlstein Organization: FreeBSD User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Craig Rodrigues Subject: Re: Running tests as a developer prior to commit References: <54EBF759.1060002@freebsd.org> <54EC1310.30509@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: "freebsd-testing@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-testing@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Testing on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 21:16:51 -0000 On 2/24/15 3:04 PM, Craig Rodrigues wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 9:58 PM, Alfred Perlstein > wrote: > > > > On 2/23/15 11:00 PM, Allan Jude wrote: > > > > Doesn't phabricator have some hooks to launch tests of a > "proposed" > patch? This could help catch the errors before they are committed > > > Yes we should hook that. > > > There is a blog post which describes this type of workflow with > Phabricator: > http://www.dctrwatson.com/2013/01/jenkins-and-phabricator/ > > It's not like we need a magician or warlock to put this together, but > somone > has to write the code to do the integration. Last I checked I'm not on cluster admin or anything admin because people are afraid I would turn the cluster into a social networking backend for a dating website (or ascii generator) so I am really not in a position to do anything about this. By the way, is Phabricator open to the wild yet? Like is it anywhere close to github? Or is it still closed door? -Alfred From owner-freebsd-testing@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 24 21:23:01 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-testing@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BCF17F2D; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 21:23:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-la0-x229.google.com (mail-la0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 38C20A62; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 21:23:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by labge10 with SMTP id ge10so28620886lab.12; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 13:22:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=/lpRrfdQuuXTYe9cf3qM1vxM2ivEUvXmiELRLQOoAu8=; b=PKF7Tb0DoXk1CW69SoApXJiQklIya1w+iJsfbyHfX7CYg72O2e75ALsbgQSQk+JHuu nFizLxPz37zv/YIT1VLmSmLbXk9g5/ITDtqdOAlom138Xk4OGBa/+ZO3Pc3vJ6eJ4hnW bMlV1Wul9XFz8kNaETCOxS7Hh2GAW1njPHu6R/+2c0lr2KyUWiiDDTU49ndRlSPFMhTF VJgf7Mb4xV28ZKz49oNItjYi31Xu17//ULVwBLv+q45pE9y0nbW6MBCFf9VT4NZemC2x os9bRALy5gmhcjb4ioImwxIsBNCBMKKkXtvP2M1iyhUBpSOhAmpqxm8lUQ3ePYHp3tC9 8rwA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.3.42 with SMTP id 10mr5375800laz.84.1424812978913; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 13:22:58 -0800 (PST) Sender: crodr001@gmail.com Received: by 10.112.82.164 with HTTP; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 13:22:58 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <54ECEB17.2040804@freebsd.org> References: <54EBF759.1060002@freebsd.org> <54EC1310.30509@freebsd.org> <54ECEB17.2040804@freebsd.org> Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 13:22:58 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: JtzHroyyeovCp6yaxCw7XzGySDY Message-ID: Subject: Re: Running tests as a developer prior to commit From: Craig Rodrigues To: Alfred Perlstein Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: "freebsd-testing@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-testing@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Testing on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 21:23:01 -0000 On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 1:20 PM, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > > Last I checked I'm not on cluster admin or anything admin because people > are afraid I would turn the cluster into a social networking backend for a > dating website (or ascii generator) so I am really not in a position to do > anything about this. > > By the way, is Phabricator open to the wild yet? Like is it anywhere > close to github? Or is it still closed door? > > I don't know the status of Phabricator for non-FreeBSD committers. phabric-admin@freebsd.org would be the best point of contact for that. -- Craig From owner-freebsd-testing@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 24 22:22:52 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-testing@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BAB00EE5 for ; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 22:22:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A0F052E1 for ; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 22:22:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t1OMMqPm026351 for ; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 22:22:52 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-testing@freebsd.org Subject: [Bug 197861] [jenkins] usr.sbin.pw.pw_useradd:user_add_password_expiration_date_relative failed Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 22:22:52 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: tests X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0-CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: commit-hook@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: brd@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-testing@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Testing on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 22:22:52 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197861 --- Comment #4 from commit-hook@freebsd.org --- A commit references this bug: Author: brd Date: Tue Feb 24 22:22:07 UTC 2015 New revision: 279256 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/279256 Log: Fix a race condition by allowing up to 5 seconds of difference between the time stamps. PR: 197861 Approved by: will Changes: head/usr.sbin/pw/tests/pw_useradd.sh -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. From owner-freebsd-testing@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 27 03:17:09 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-testing@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E5EA8521; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 03:17:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-la0-x22a.google.com (mail-la0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 62C38623; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 03:17:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by labgq15 with SMTP id gq15so15004532lab.6; Thu, 26 Feb 2015 19:17:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=XEVw3sxCJdRdVmJzk8w7Pm/StExB5E6m2VOLuQPUk8Q=; b=SFvEMBX8P/nBLVeA3xnE+/x+oi5sm3HFoct6X5UD7yBZX0A5dO7pCdpNuGI2+y34DG 1fwttH0fssrwjLUgdAJYf6MMbwCRkD68Uqy2BDP5BWiWRDD4f1LfxsIu9b3Lga1ITbHz MiYJFr+EJhKD5cEU0DMYHQGQusZvjAfCWv5XpCBZwUez8eF2bopjHw7cRQyISOQXEoTG XLn0Fj2zShoOtEXQihW2ezTmVC9u0fNj8Y9OYWmNIdYGM1Cv0lLKo0V22VxqQUo4Zhdx eiP5xwmiHb4NbBAfsLDShEjCejaKIRSIgtT88WNhrZ6KivjAw5/gxFTp+Ua8cDcbnWqL 3ugw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.223.7 with SMTP id qq7mr10514614lbc.81.1425007027338; Thu, 26 Feb 2015 19:17:07 -0800 (PST) Sender: crodr001@gmail.com Received: by 10.112.82.164 with HTTP; Thu, 26 Feb 2015 19:17:07 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 19:17:07 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: QpQStFOWg9ycH8CbtyczJ_7f4ow Message-ID: Subject: Re: Running tests as a developer prior to commit From: Craig Rodrigues To: Ed Maste Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: "freebsd-testing@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-testing@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Testing on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 03:17:10 -0000 On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 7:20 PM, Ed Maste wrote: > > This is precisely why I'd like to find a way to make it easy to run a > (rather small) subset of tests, if a developer desires to do so. The > alternative is that they decide it's too awkward to run the tests, and > just don't bother. Even in that case we're still better off today > (since the Jenkins task will catch it) than we were some time ago > before consistent test infrastructure existed. But it seems we ought > to avoid the latency, mailing list churn, and masking effect of a > broken test run if we can facilitate the developer running a set of > tests that they've identified. > If I could do: cd /usr/src/bin/ls/ make test and have it run the unit tests associated with /bin/ls, that would be a good start. It wouldn't be perfect, because if a change to /bin/ls, affects some other test in /usr/src/usr.bin/foobar/ , this wouldn't catch it. You would have to do something more complicated by building an expert system which can compute the dependencies in the tree and run the appropriate tests. But having that is better than nothing. As far as I understand things, the way the unit tests are integrated in the Makefile infrastructure, the tests need to be staged to /usr/tests/ in order to be run. As part of the staging process, Kyuafiles are generated which are used as input to the "kyua" binary. I don't have any make-fu to know how to simplify all of this stuff. Well, on a positive note, at least we *are* running the unit tests every day as people commit code, and reporting the results. That's a huge deal. I've seen large companies who don't do as good a job with this stuff, so we are not doing too badly in FreeBSD. Over time, I am sure we will improve things with better automation. Julio Merino accomplished a huge milestone by getting *any* type of unit tests into the FreeBSD source tree, and integrated with the build. Regularly running the tests under automation was the next milestone. The next milestone will be making it easier for developers to use. I think that the solution which will be realistically achievable, which people will actually use and not rebel over is some type of test automation hooked into Github pull requests against the FreeBSD src tree. -- Craig -- Craig From owner-freebsd-testing@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 27 03:24:57 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-testing@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 162D6607; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 03:24:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pd0-x22a.google.com (mail-pd0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c02::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CCEA676C; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 03:24:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pdjz10 with SMTP id z10so17911757pdj.0; Thu, 26 Feb 2015 19:24:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :message-id:references:to; bh=gtCFxPbm6dOIlR3EUH6iBpQktuuuso34JlNqEh72U00=; b=TKlg16+9je6NWtJNNTefagzV/qA0E93T7Ct5zGEceQ8jMxvMhIHJ9CTW+b209F/dtI OTV2fBwYgGg19U0URiuJekJvnFeBlkUUlKLx47gHhPqJKhBhghcz3zAKDunh3nYS0hsb Ssg4z8bRSHQFrBdMqAVlKSMM5Qwm6hWYZdRpx5q6Gl4hcwczOz7bbB7m8YZJRGE2yJYM VVm/K1Js6F3firZQhKn1O1lc8aooFyoaUbGjWDRFbATp90THqr/inQCbHoGXsEWqIm+P UreZkWKeiCnugN7dDMgj8erCZUQXB5uAHifbSVUhI5sepYyFQO3Dw0QoWIEgCsJU5Y+6 +fnQ== X-Received: by 10.70.90.9 with SMTP id bs9mr8627091pdb.137.1425007496359; Thu, 26 Feb 2015 19:24:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPv6:2601:8:ab80:7d6:15c9:2275:95cb:45c0? ([2601:8:ab80:7d6:15c9:2275:95cb:45c0]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id r7sm2270354pdo.90.2015.02.26.19.24.55 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 26 Feb 2015 19:24:55 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_B5E27DFE-3A9E-4B01-BB52-8A02313317B3"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) Subject: Re: Running tests as a developer prior to commit From: Garrett Cooper In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 19:24:53 -0800 Message-Id: <8E237BF1-E8DB-44D6-BA9F-89E386D0F3C0@gmail.com> References: To: Craig Rodrigues X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) Cc: "freebsd-testing@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-testing@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Testing on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 03:24:57 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_B5E27DFE-3A9E-4B01-BB52-8A02313317B3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 On Feb 26, 2015, at 19:17, Craig Rodrigues wrote: > On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 7:20 PM, Ed Maste wrote: >=20 >>=20 >> This is precisely why I'd like to find a way to make it easy to run a >> (rather small) subset of tests, if a developer desires to do so. The >> alternative is that they decide it's too awkward to run the tests, = and >> just don't bother. Even in that case we're still better off today >> (since the Jenkins task will catch it) than we were some time ago >> before consistent test infrastructure existed. But it seems we ought >> to avoid the latency, mailing list churn, and masking effect of a >> broken test run if we can facilitate the developer running a set of >> tests that they've identified. >>=20 >=20 > If I could do: > cd /usr/src/bin/ls/ > make test >=20 > and have it run the unit tests associated with /bin/ls, that would be = a > good start. >=20 > It wouldn't be perfect, because if a change to /bin/ls, affects some = other > test > in /usr/src/usr.bin/foobar/ , this wouldn't catch it. You would have = to do > something > more complicated by building an expert system which can compute the > dependencies > in the tree and run the appropriate tests. But having that is better = than > nothing. >=20 > As far as I understand things, the way the unit tests are integrated = in the > Makefile > infrastructure, the tests need to be staged to /usr/tests/ in order to = be > run. > As part of the staging process, Kyuafiles are generated which are used = as > input > to the "kyua" binary. I don't have any make-fu to know how to = simplify all > of this stuff. >=20 > Well, on a positive note, at least we *are* running the unit tests = every > day as people > commit code, and reporting the results. That's a huge deal. > I've seen large companies who don't do as good a job with this stuff, = so we > are not doing too badly in FreeBSD. >=20 > Over time, I am sure we will improve things with better automation. >=20 > Julio Merino accomplished a huge milestone by getting *any* type of = unit > tests into the FreeBSD source > tree, and integrated with the build. Regularly running the tests = under > automation was the next milestone. >=20 > The next milestone will be making it easier for developers to use. I = think > that the solution > which will be realistically achievable, which people will actually use = and > not rebel over > is some type of test automation hooked into Github pull requests = against > the FreeBSD src tree. Hi, This hook (running tests from a subdir) already exists, but is = incomplete: $ make test *** Using this test does not preclude you from running the tests *** installed in /usr/tests. This test run may raise false *** positives and/or false negatives. *** WARNING: make test is experimental *** *** Using this test does not preclude you from running the tests *** installed in /usr/tests. This test run may raise false *** positives and/or false negatives. kyua: E: Load of '/usr/tests/bin/pkill/Kyuafile' failed: File = '/usr/tests/bin/pkill/Kyuafile' not found. *** Error code 2 Stop. make: stopped in /usr/src.svn/bin/pkill/tests I have code on github which expands make test to install everything to = ${.OBJDIR}, then run the tests. make testworld doesn=92t exist either, so I=92ll work on plumbing that = into the build system, because having to cd into every directory to run = tests is silly. Thanks for the reminder :). --Apple-Mail=_B5E27DFE-3A9E-4B01-BB52-8A02313317B3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJU7+OFAAoJEMZr5QU6S73e8S0H/3TbaLzJbQf7QrcnrFwW0aLR h4RNxQgQQp2DO/OluAZikb6H1WfdxJ074AVRisA+4cFm8kgRKKQ/41jf04fciWXz 2zpMEMyPojD/n++aSiU1kRyaNNk2mAH/hS/6w/1Z9X/0C7ah9/yOWTlJqtATGKOT yXdFchMjqTz1GFLGOJGtLPxPFuuLrnl1JXOFmYpsrZLpkcJhx8LokkPHgcLxrvXm hGRbzOoKtI0dNPy3Z+bgbyCjc95zb/FFN2FBjDFVGtaHv6WthJYIe61LQ8jErWJq wHQ2sEWWr2S4GBspi5eqyC8eq1O1xCs42+5xnWMtSU4x2bx3ZkaAWgaEhn9WV9A= =Bhnx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_B5E27DFE-3A9E-4B01-BB52-8A02313317B3-- From owner-freebsd-testing@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 27 17:45:36 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-testing@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DEF32372 for ; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 17:45:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C4FF3CB4 for ; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 17:45:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t1RHjaVg085350 for ; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 17:45:36 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-testing@freebsd.org Subject: [Bug 198079] The WITHOUT_DYNAMIC_ROOT option should be tested with Jenkins. Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 17:45:36 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: tests X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0-CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: eirnym@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-testing@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version rep_platform op_sys bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-testing@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Testing on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 17:45:37 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198079 Bug ID: 198079 Summary: The WITHOUT_DYNAMIC_ROOT option should be tested with Jenkins. Product: Base System Version: 11.0-CURRENT Hardware: Any OS: Any Status: New Severity: Affects Only Me Priority: --- Component: tests Assignee: freebsd-testing@freebsd.org Reporter: eirnym@gmail.com You'll see all library dependencies changes with this option enabled. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. From owner-freebsd-testing@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 27 17:57:32 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-testing@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B710720 for ; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 17:57:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 80D07DE6 for ; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 17:57:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t1RHvVSl095779 for ; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 17:57:31 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-testing@freebsd.org Subject: [Bug 198079] The WITHOUT_DYNAMIC_ROOT option should be tested with Jenkins. Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 17:57:32 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: tests X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0-CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: eirnym@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-testing@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: dependson Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-testing@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Testing on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 17:57:32 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198079 Eir Nym changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |198078 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. From owner-freebsd-testing@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 27 17:58:21 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-testing@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 377F9797 for ; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 17:58:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1CE12DF5 for ; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 17:58:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t1RHwK3m096090 for ; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 17:58:20 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-testing@freebsd.org Subject: [Bug 198079] The WITHOUT_DYNAMIC_ROOT option should be tested with Jenkins. Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 17:58:21 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: tests X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0-CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: eirnym@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-testing@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: dependson Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-testing@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Testing on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 17:58:21 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198079 Eir Nym changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on|198078 | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. From owner-freebsd-testing@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 27 17:58:53 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-testing@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 17625811 for ; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 17:58:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F1128E04 for ; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 17:58:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t1RHwqTC096349 for ; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 17:58:52 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-testing@freebsd.org Subject: [Bug 198079] The WITHOUT_DYNAMIC_ROOT option should be tested with Jenkins. Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 17:58:53 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: tests X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0-CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: eirnym@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-testing@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-testing@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Testing on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 17:58:53 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198079 --- Comment #1 from Eir Nym --- Example of absence of this testing is https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198078 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. From owner-freebsd-testing@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 28 02:25:14 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-testing@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F24B9B50 for ; Sat, 28 Feb 2015 02:25:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D7EEAEAC for ; Sat, 28 Feb 2015 02:25:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t1S2PEDY022163 for ; Sat, 28 Feb 2015 02:25:14 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-testing@freebsd.org Subject: [Bug 198079] The WITHOUT_DYNAMIC_ROOT option should be tested with Jenkins. Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2015 02:25:14 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: tests X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0-CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: ngie@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-testing@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: see_also Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-testing@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Testing on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2015 02:25:15 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198079 Garrett Cooper,425-314-3911 changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- See Also| |https://bugs.freebsd.org/bu | |gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1980 | |78 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.