From owner-ctm-users@freebsd.org Sun Nov 6 08:40:58 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ctm-users@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0F89BEDCAE for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2016 08:40:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daeron@optusnet.com.au) Received: from mail107.syd.optusnet.com.au (mail107.syd.optusnet.com.au [211.29.132.53]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EB34237 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2016 08:40:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daeron@optusnet.com.au) Received: from [192.168.0.12] (c110-20-6-208.rivrw8.nsw.optusnet.com.au [110.20.6.208]) (Authenticated sender: daeron@optusnet.com.au) by mail107.syd.optusnet.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2859FD46BB5; Sun, 6 Nov 2016 19:40:41 +1100 (AEDT) Message-ID: <1478421640.50570.13.camel@optushome.com.au> Subject: Re: current ctm reports: Fatal error: Probably not a CTM-patch at all. From: Andrew Johnson To: "Julian H. Stacey" , ctm-users@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2016 19:40:40 +1100 In-Reply-To: <201611051539.uA5FdbMK005641@fire.js.berklix.net> References: <201611051539.uA5FdbMK005641@fire.js.berklix.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.18.5.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Optus-CM-Score: 0 X-Optus-CM-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=VIkg5I7X c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=/S0mubmcBdvyZEDpRfmPFw==:117 a=/S0mubmcBdvyZEDpRfmPFw==:17 a=L9H7d07YOLsA:10 a=9cW_t1CCXrUA:10 a=s5jvgZ67dGcA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=gnDAodjkUCj4hF5SrxYA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=IjZwj45LgO3ly-622nXo:22 X-BeenThere: ctm-users@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: CTM User discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2016 08:40:59 -0000 Scary seeming I normally never look at the logs but have been relying on my mail client to pipe the deltas to my own CTM repository from which I update as needed all the servers and workstations. On Sat, 2016-11-05 at 16:39 +0100, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > Hi ctm-users@freebsd.org > Anyone else seeing similar strangeness ? ... > No problem running on 9.2-RELEASE, but on today's current : > ( /usr/src .svn_revision 308280 .ctm_status src-cur 12727 ) > after an installworld & kernel ) > From owner-ctm-users@freebsd.org Sun Nov 6 23:55:27 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ctm-users@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7239EC34568 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2016 23:55:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stephen@missouri.edu) Received: from um-nip4-missouri-out.um.umsystem.edu (um-nip4-missouri-out.um.umsystem.edu [198.209.49.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "um-tip1.um.umsystem.edu", Issuer "InCommon RSA Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3FD233D5 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2016 23:55:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stephen@missouri.edu) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A2E0CQDOwR9Y/9KeoM9dGwEBAQMBAQEJA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBgy4BAQEBAR9YKlIHAaQwlloBIIYDAoIJQxABAgEBAQEBAQEDXx0Lg0ssLj0?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQSBCQIBCBgWARcyJQIEDQYCAQGIVLMHiBEBBoMvASSIO4JYgSKDDxZIAYUXB?= =?us-ascii?q?YhCh0+ENoVgAYY0hgOUHI0qhAY1IHqDMRyBXXKFQw0XgQoBgQsBAQE?= X-IPAS-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A2E0CQDOwR9Y/9KeoM9dGwEBAQMBAQEJAQEBgy4BAQEBAR9?= =?us-ascii?q?YKlIHAaQwlloBIIYDAoIJQxABAgEBAQEBAQEDXx0Lg0ssLj0BAQSBCQIBCBgWA?= =?us-ascii?q?RcyJQIEDQYCAQGIVLMHiBEBBoMvASSIO4JYgSKDDxZIAYUXBYhCh0+ENoVgAYY?= =?us-ascii?q?0hgOUHI0qhAY1IHqDMRyBXXKFQw0XgQoBgQsBAQE?= Received: from um-ncas5.um.umsystem.edu ([207.160.158.210]) by um-nip4-exch-relay.um.umsystem.edu with ESMTP; 06 Nov 2016 17:54:16 -0600 Received: from UM-MBX-N02.um.umsystem.edu ([169.254.5.4]) by UM-NCAS5.um.umsystem.edu ([207.160.158.210]) with mapi id 14.03.0266.001; Sun, 6 Nov 2016 17:54:15 -0600 From: "Montgomery-Smith, Stephen" To: "ctm-users@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: current ctm reports: Fatal error: Probably not a CTM-patch at all. Thread-Topic: current ctm reports: Fatal error: Probably not a CTM-patch at all. Thread-Index: AQHSN3rhpxHrR6EOWE+WtH6dmZFWK6DNB8iA Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2016 23:54:15 +0000 Message-ID: References: <201611051539.uA5FdbMK005641@fire.js.berklix.net> In-Reply-To: <201611051539.uA5FdbMK005641@fire.js.berklix.net> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 x-originating-ip: [128.206.49.160] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: ctm-users@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: CTM User discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2016 23:55:27 -0000 On 11/05/2016 10:39 AM, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > Hi ctm-users@freebsd.org > Anyone else seeing similar strangeness ? ... > No problem running on 9.2-RELEASE, but on today's current : > ( /usr/src .svn_revision 308280 .ctm_status src-cur 12727 ) > after an installworld & kernel ) >=20 > cd /usr/svn; cat .ctm_status > svn-cur 5081 > ctm -q /pub/FreeBSD/development/CTM/svn-cur/svn-cur.05[0-9][0-9][0-9].xz > /pub/FreeBSD/development/CTM/svn-cur/svn-cur.05000.xz \ > Fatal error: Probably not a CTM-patch at all. > # Yes I know I dont need earlier deltas, but its a cut & paste > # suggestion from my standard script > # The point is, ctm always used to just skip past deltas it didnt need, > # including those it now doesnt recognise as deltas. > # ctm also fails on delta it does need, see below: > # Both these fail: > ctm /pub/FreeBSD/development/CTM/svn-cur/svn-cur.05082.xz > ctm -v /pub/FreeBSD/development/CTM/svn-cur/svn-cur.05082.xz > Fatal error: Probably not a CTM-patch at all. > ctm: exit(65) >=20 > Delta is not corrupt: >=20 > cd /pub/FreeBSD/development/CTM/svn-cur > sha256 svn-cur.05082.xz > SHA256 (svn-cur.05082.xz) =3D d2b20f44265cca77a811eb074abdbe58466bf72d8f= 5f3a39113a7b82a5a0b1b8 >=20 > ssh ctm.berklix.org (or as no public login, ftp & sha256 localy) > cd /pub/FreeBSD/development/CTM/svn-cur > sha256 svn-cur.05082.xz > SHA256 (svn-cur.05082.xz) =3D d2b20f44265cca77a811eb074abdbe58466bf72d8f= 5f3a39113a7b82a5a0b1b8 >=20 > Proof that its not delta at fault, but ctm command: >=20 > cd /pub/FreeBSD/development/CTM/svn-cur; pwd > /.amd_mnt/fire/0s4/ftp/pub/FreeBSD/development/CTM/svn-cur > cd /usr/svn;pwd > /data/usr/ftp/pri/FreeBSD/development/FreeBSD-SVN >=20 > ssh fire # 9.2 host > cd /host/lapr/data/usr/ftp/pri/FreeBSD/development/FreeBSD-SVN > ctm /0s4/ftp/pub/FreeBSD/development/CTM/svn-cur/svn-cur.05082.xz > ctm: .ctm_status: Permission denied > # OK, i just auto apply deltas from /etc/aliases, hence > # it complaining about ownerships, but not about delta content. >=20 > ssh -l mailnull-csh localhost # still on 9.2 host > cd /host/lapr/data/usr/ftp/pri/FreeBSD/development/FreeBSD-SVN > ctm /0s4/ftp/pub/FreeBSD/development/CTM/svn-cur/svn-cur.05082.xz > > FS .ctm_status > > SV > svnadmin: E000045: Can't get exclusive lock on file 'base/db/txn-current= -lock': Operation not supported > Broken pipe > # OK that's some NFS problem applying delta, but at least old > # 9.2 ctm command accepts delta to apply, unlike current ctm >=20 > Curiously I am not seeing same problem running on 12 current file system > & 12 current bin/ctm, applying deltas to src-cur/ > cat .ctm_status > src-cur 12727 > ctm -q /pub/FreeBSD/development/CTM/src-cur/src-*.1[0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9].g= z > cat .ctm_status > src-cur 12729 >=20 > Cheers, > Julian >=20 Let me look into this. I did accidentally reboot the delta creating server a few days ago at an inopportune time. That might be the cause of the error. Sorry.= From owner-ctm-users@freebsd.org Mon Nov 7 01:09:50 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ctm-users@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34297C33D05 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2016 01:09:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from land.berklix.org (land.berklix.org [144.76.10.75]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D3BA174D for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2016 01:09:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from mart.js.berklix.net (p5B226927.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [91.34.105.39]) (authenticated bits=128) by land.berklix.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPA id uA719hoY007885; Mon, 7 Nov 2016 01:09:44 GMT (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (fire.js.berklix.net [192.168.91.41]) by mart.js.berklix.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id uA719g2P031644; Mon, 7 Nov 2016 02:09:43 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fire.js.berklix.net (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id uA719Oid064992; Mon, 7 Nov 2016 02:09:36 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Message-Id: <201611070109.uA719Oid064992@fire.js.berklix.net> To: "Montgomery-Smith, Stephen" cc: "ctm-users@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: current ctm reports: Fatal error: Probably not a CTM-patch at all. From: "Julian H. Stacey" Organization: http://berklix.eu BSD Unix Linux Consultants, Munich Germany User-agent: EXMH on FreeBSD http://berklix.eu/free/ X-From: http://www.berklix.eu/~jhs/ In-reply-to: Your message "Sun, 06 Nov 2016 23:54:15 +0000." Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2016 02:09:24 +0100 X-BeenThere: ctm-users@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: CTM User discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2016 01:09:50 -0000 Hi, Reference: > From: "Montgomery-Smith, Stephen" > Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2016 23:54:15 +0000 "Montgomery-Smith, Stephen" wrote: > On 11/05/2016 10:39 AM, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > > Hi ctm-users@freebsd.org > > Anyone else seeing similar strangeness ? ... > > No problem running on 9.2-RELEASE, but on today's current : > > ( /usr/src .svn_revision 308280 .ctm_status src-cur 12727 ) > > after an installworld & kernel ) > > > > cd /usr/svn; cat .ctm_status > > svn-cur 5081 > > ctm -q /pub/FreeBSD/development/CTM/svn-cur/svn-cur.05[0-9][0-9][0-9].xz > > /pub/FreeBSD/development/CTM/svn-cur/svn-cur.05000.xz \ > > Fatal error: Probably not a CTM-patch at all. > > # Yes I know I dont need earlier deltas, but its a cut & paste > > # suggestion from my standard script > > # The point is, ctm always used to just skip past deltas it didnt need, > > # including those it now doesnt recognise as deltas. > > # ctm also fails on delta it does need, see below: > > # Both these fail: > > ctm /pub/FreeBSD/development/CTM/svn-cur/svn-cur.05082.xz > > ctm -v /pub/FreeBSD/development/CTM/svn-cur/svn-cur.05082.xz > > Fatal error: Probably not a CTM-patch at all. > > ctm: exit(65) > > > > Delta is not corrupt: > > > > cd /pub/FreeBSD/development/CTM/svn-cur > > sha256 svn-cur.05082.xz > > SHA256 (svn-cur.05082.xz) = d2b20f44265cca77a811eb074abdbe58466bf72d8f5f3a39113a7b82a5a0b1b8 > > > > ssh ctm.berklix.org (or as no public login, ftp & sha256 localy) > > cd /pub/FreeBSD/development/CTM/svn-cur > > sha256 svn-cur.05082.xz > > SHA256 (svn-cur.05082.xz) = d2b20f44265cca77a811eb074abdbe58466bf72d8f5f3a39113a7b82a5a0b1b8 > > > > Proof that its not delta at fault, but ctm command: > > > > cd /pub/FreeBSD/development/CTM/svn-cur; pwd > > /.amd_mnt/fire/0s4/ftp/pub/FreeBSD/development/CTM/svn-cur > > cd /usr/svn;pwd > > /data/usr/ftp/pri/FreeBSD/development/FreeBSD-SVN > > > > ssh fire # 9.2 host > > cd /host/lapr/data/usr/ftp/pri/FreeBSD/development/FreeBSD-SVN > > ctm /0s4/ftp/pub/FreeBSD/development/CTM/svn-cur/svn-cur.05082.xz > > ctm: .ctm_status: Permission denied > > # OK, i just auto apply deltas from /etc/aliases, hence > > # it complaining about ownerships, but not about delta content. > > > > ssh -l mailnull-csh localhost # still on 9.2 host > > cd /host/lapr/data/usr/ftp/pri/FreeBSD/development/FreeBSD-SVN > > ctm /0s4/ftp/pub/FreeBSD/development/CTM/svn-cur/svn-cur.05082.xz > > > FS .ctm_status > > > SV > > svnadmin: E000045: Can't get exclusive lock on file 'base/db/txn-current-lock': Operation not supported > > Broken pipe > > # OK that's some NFS problem applying delta, but at least old > > # 9.2 ctm command accepts delta to apply, unlike current ctm > > > > Curiously I am not seeing same problem running on 12 current file system > > & 12 current bin/ctm, applying deltas to src-cur/ > > cat .ctm_status > > src-cur 12727 > > ctm -q /pub/FreeBSD/development/CTM/src-cur/src-*.1[0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9].gz > > cat .ctm_status > > src-cur 12729 > > > > Cheers, > > Julian > > > > Let me look into this. I did accidentally reboot the delta creating > server a few days ago at an inopportune time. That might be the cause > of the error. > > Sorry. I dont think its a corrupt delta, as my 9.2 seems to have no problems running ctm on the delta. I havent had time to investigate yet, but I suspcet a bad ctm under src, maybe a bad commit to src/ of ctm or a bad shared lib, dont know. First off: does anyone else run current to apply ctms deltas ? Can anyone else see what I reported. Cheers, Julian -- Julian Stacey, BSD Linux Unix Sys Eng Consultant Munich Reply below, Prefix '> '. Plain text, No .doc, base64, HTML, quoted-printable. http://berklix.eu/brexit/#stolen_votes From owner-ctm-users@freebsd.org Mon Nov 7 03:33:46 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ctm-users@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6F11C328CA for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2016 03:33:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stephen@missouri.edu) Received: from mst-rip5-missouri-out.um.umsystem.edu (mst-rip5-missouri-out.um.umsystem.edu [198.209.50.135]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "um-tip1.um.umsystem.edu", Issuer "InCommon RSA Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 74F5DAE1 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2016 03:33:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stephen@missouri.edu) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A2FfCQCj9R9Y/9KeoM9dHAEBBAEBCgEBg?= =?us-ascii?q?y4BAQEBAR9YKlIHAaQwlloBIIYDAoIJQxABAgEBAQEBAQEDXx0Lg0ssLj0BAQS?= =?us-ascii?q?BCQIBCBgWARcyJQIEDQYCAQGIVLMBiBEBBoMvASSIO4JYgSKDJUgBhRcFiEKHT?= =?us-ascii?q?4oWAYY0hgOUHI0qhAY1IHqDMRyBXXKFQw0XgQoBgQsBAQE?= X-IPAS-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A2FfCQCj9R9Y/9KeoM9dHAEBBAEBCgEBgy4BAQEBAR9YKlI?= =?us-ascii?q?HAaQwlloBIIYDAoIJQxABAgEBAQEBAQEDXx0Lg0ssLj0BAQSBCQIBCBgWARcyJ?= =?us-ascii?q?QIEDQYCAQGIVLMBiBEBBoMvASSIO4JYgSKDJUgBhRcFiEKHT4oWAYY0hgOUHI0?= =?us-ascii?q?qhAY1IHqDMRyBXXKFQw0XgQoBgQsBAQE?= Received: from um-ncas5.um.umsystem.edu ([207.160.158.210]) by mst-rip5-exch-relay.um.umsystem.edu with ESMTP; 06 Nov 2016 21:32:15 -0600 Received: from UM-MBX-N02.um.umsystem.edu ([169.254.5.4]) by UM-NCAS5.um.umsystem.edu ([207.160.158.210]) with mapi id 14.03.0266.001; Sun, 6 Nov 2016 21:32:15 -0600 From: "Montgomery-Smith, Stephen" To: "ctm-users@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: current ctm reports: Fatal error: Probably not a CTM-patch at all. Thread-Topic: current ctm reports: Fatal error: Probably not a CTM-patch at all. Thread-Index: AQHSN3rhpxHrR6EOWE+WtH6dmZFWK6DNRK8A Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2016 03:32:14 +0000 Message-ID: <9b099cb6-289a-3b70-8b9f-26a2a64bac0a@missouri.edu> References: <201611051539.uA5FdbMK005641@fire.js.berklix.net> In-Reply-To: <201611051539.uA5FdbMK005641@fire.js.berklix.net> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 x-originating-ip: [128.206.49.160] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: ctm-users@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: CTM User discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2016 03:33:46 -0000 On 11/05/2016 10:39 AM, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > Hi ctm-users@freebsd.org > Anyone else seeing similar strangeness ? ... > No problem running on 9.2-RELEASE, but on today's current : > ( /usr/src .svn_revision 308280 .ctm_status src-cur 12727 ) > after an installworld & kernel ) >=20 > cd /usr/svn; cat .ctm_status > svn-cur 5081 > ctm -q /pub/FreeBSD/development/CTM/svn-cur/svn-cur.05[0-9][0-9][0-9].xz > /pub/FreeBSD/development/CTM/svn-cur/svn-cur.05000.xz \ > Fatal error: Probably not a CTM-patch at all. > # Yes I know I dont need earlier deltas, but its a cut & paste > # suggestion from my standard script > # The point is, ctm always used to just skip past deltas it didnt need, > # including those it now doesnt recognise as deltas. > # ctm also fails on delta it does need, see below: > # Both these fail: > ctm /pub/FreeBSD/development/CTM/svn-cur/svn-cur.05082.xz > ctm -v /pub/FreeBSD/development/CTM/svn-cur/svn-cur.05082.xz > Fatal error: Probably not a CTM-patch at all. > ctm: exit(65) >=20 > Delta is not corrupt: >=20 > cd /pub/FreeBSD/development/CTM/svn-cur > sha256 svn-cur.05082.xz > SHA256 (svn-cur.05082.xz) =3D d2b20f44265cca77a811eb074abdbe58466bf72d8f= 5f3a39113a7b82a5a0b1b8 >=20 > ssh ctm.berklix.org (or as no public login, ftp & sha256 localy) > cd /pub/FreeBSD/development/CTM/svn-cur > sha256 svn-cur.05082.xz > SHA256 (svn-cur.05082.xz) =3D d2b20f44265cca77a811eb074abdbe58466bf72d8f= 5f3a39113a7b82a5a0b1b8 >=20 > Proof that its not delta at fault, but ctm command: >=20 > cd /pub/FreeBSD/development/CTM/svn-cur; pwd > /.amd_mnt/fire/0s4/ftp/pub/FreeBSD/development/CTM/svn-cur > cd /usr/svn;pwd > /data/usr/ftp/pri/FreeBSD/development/FreeBSD-SVN >=20 > ssh fire # 9.2 host > cd /host/lapr/data/usr/ftp/pri/FreeBSD/development/FreeBSD-SVN > ctm /0s4/ftp/pub/FreeBSD/development/CTM/svn-cur/svn-cur.05082.xz > ctm: .ctm_status: Permission denied > # OK, i just auto apply deltas from /etc/aliases, hence > # it complaining about ownerships, but not about delta content. >=20 > ssh -l mailnull-csh localhost # still on 9.2 host > cd /host/lapr/data/usr/ftp/pri/FreeBSD/development/FreeBSD-SVN > ctm /0s4/ftp/pub/FreeBSD/development/CTM/svn-cur/svn-cur.05082.xz > > FS .ctm_status > > SV > svnadmin: E000045: Can't get exclusive lock on file 'base/db/txn-current= -lock': Operation not supported > Broken pipe > # OK that's some NFS problem applying delta, but at least old > # 9.2 ctm command accepts delta to apply, unlike current ctm >=20 > Curiously I am not seeing same problem running on 12 current file system > & 12 current bin/ctm, applying deltas to src-cur/ > cat .ctm_status > src-cur 12727 > ctm -q /pub/FreeBSD/development/CTM/src-cur/src-*.1[0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9].g= z > cat .ctm_status > src-cur 12729 >=20 > Cheers, > Julian >=20 Did you remember to apply the patch to ctm after applying the src-cur deltas? (I forget to do this all the time.)= From owner-ctm-users@freebsd.org Mon Nov 7 15:21:09 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ctm-users@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74879C34356 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2016 15:21:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from land.berklix.org (land.berklix.org [144.76.10.75]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 050A0B0A for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2016 15:21:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from mart.js.berklix.net (p5B227090.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [91.34.112.144]) (authenticated bits=128) by land.berklix.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPA id uA7FL3ni042299; Mon, 7 Nov 2016 15:21:03 GMT (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (fire.js.berklix.net [192.168.91.41]) by mart.js.berklix.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id uA7FL02o034213; Mon, 7 Nov 2016 16:21:00 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fire.js.berklix.net (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id uA7FKfYQ007164; Mon, 7 Nov 2016 16:20:53 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Message-Id: <201611071520.uA7FKfYQ007164@fire.js.berklix.net> To: "Montgomery-Smith, Stephen" cc: "ctm-users@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: current ctm reports: Fatal error: Probably not a CTM-patch at all. From: "Julian H. Stacey" Organization: http://berklix.eu BSD Unix Linux Consultants, Munich Germany User-agent: EXMH on FreeBSD http://berklix.eu/free/ X-From: http://www.berklix.eu/~jhs/ In-reply-to: Your message "Mon, 07 Nov 2016 03:32:14 +0000." <9b099cb6-289a-3b70-8b9f-26a2a64bac0a@missouri.edu> Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2016 16:20:41 +0100 X-BeenThere: ctm-users@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: CTM User discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2016 15:21:09 -0000 "Montgomery-Smith, Stephen" wrote: > On 11/05/2016 10:39 AM, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > > Hi ctm-users@freebsd.org > > Anyone else seeing similar strangeness ? ... > > No problem running on 9.2-RELEASE, but on today's current : > > ( /usr/src .svn_revision 308280 .ctm_status src-cur 12727 ) > > after an installworld & kernel ) > > > > cd /usr/svn; cat .ctm_status > > svn-cur 5081 > > ctm -q /pub/FreeBSD/development/CTM/svn-cur/svn-cur.05[0-9][0-9][0-9].xz > > /pub/FreeBSD/development/CTM/svn-cur/svn-cur.05000.xz \ > > Fatal error: Probably not a CTM-patch at all. > > # Yes I know I dont need earlier deltas, but its a cut & paste > > # suggestion from my standard script > > # The point is, ctm always used to just skip past deltas it didnt need, > > # including those it now doesnt recognise as deltas. > > # ctm also fails on delta it does need, see below: > > # Both these fail: > > ctm /pub/FreeBSD/development/CTM/svn-cur/svn-cur.05082.xz > > ctm -v /pub/FreeBSD/development/CTM/svn-cur/svn-cur.05082.xz > > Fatal error: Probably not a CTM-patch at all. > > ctm: exit(65) > > > > Delta is not corrupt: > > > > cd /pub/FreeBSD/development/CTM/svn-cur > > sha256 svn-cur.05082.xz > > SHA256 (svn-cur.05082.xz) = d2b20f44265cca77a811eb074abdbe58466bf72d8f5f3a39113a7b82a5a0b1b8 > > > > ssh ctm.berklix.org (or as no public login, ftp & sha256 localy) > > cd /pub/FreeBSD/development/CTM/svn-cur > > sha256 svn-cur.05082.xz > > SHA256 (svn-cur.05082.xz) = d2b20f44265cca77a811eb074abdbe58466bf72d8f5f3a39113a7b82a5a0b1b8 > > > > Proof that its not delta at fault, but ctm command: > > > > cd /pub/FreeBSD/development/CTM/svn-cur; pwd > > /.amd_mnt/fire/0s4/ftp/pub/FreeBSD/development/CTM/svn-cur > > cd /usr/svn;pwd > > /data/usr/ftp/pri/FreeBSD/development/FreeBSD-SVN > > > > ssh fire # 9.2 host > > cd /host/lapr/data/usr/ftp/pri/FreeBSD/development/FreeBSD-SVN > > ctm /0s4/ftp/pub/FreeBSD/development/CTM/svn-cur/svn-cur.05082.xz > > ctm: .ctm_status: Permission denied > > # OK, i just auto apply deltas from /etc/aliases, hence > > # it complaining about ownerships, but not about delta content. > > > > ssh -l mailnull-csh localhost # still on 9.2 host > > cd /host/lapr/data/usr/ftp/pri/FreeBSD/development/FreeBSD-SVN > > ctm /0s4/ftp/pub/FreeBSD/development/CTM/svn-cur/svn-cur.05082.xz > > > FS .ctm_status > > > SV > > svnadmin: E000045: Can't get exclusive lock on file 'base/db/txn-current-lock': Operation not supported > > Broken pipe > > # OK that's some NFS problem applying delta, but at least old > > # 9.2 ctm command accepts delta to apply, unlike current ctm > > > > Curiously I am not seeing same problem running on 12 current file system > > & 12 current bin/ctm, applying deltas to src-cur/ > > cat .ctm_status > > src-cur 12727 > > ctm -q /pub/FreeBSD/development/CTM/src-cur/src-*.1[0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9].gz > > cat .ctm_status > > src-cur 12729 > > > > Cheers, > > Julian > > > > Did you remember to apply the patch to ctm after applying the src-cur > deltas? (I forget to do this all the time.) I started from a make world & kernel built from generic current src/ uname -a FreeBSD lapr.js.berklix.net 12.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 12.0-CURRENT #12727: Sat Nov 5 13:42:38 CET 2016 jhs@lapr.js.berklix.net:/data/release/12.0-CURRENT/usr/src/sys/\ amd64/compile/LAPR.small amd64 I assumed all CTM patches were committed to current, as years old: ssh ctm.berklix.org cd /pub/FreeBSD/development/CTM/svn-cur ; ls -l | grep patch| grep -v .sig drwxr-xr-x 2 jhs staff 1024 Nov 7 11:41 old-patches/ -rw-r--r-- 1 jhs staff 16221 Nov 15 2014 patch-for-ctm-v09 -rw-r--r-- 1 jhs staff 878 Sep 24 2012 patch-for-ctm_rmail -rw-r--r-- 1 jhs staff 583 Dec 25 2011 patch-for-ctm_smail -rw-r--r-- 1 jhs staff 8655 Nov 15 2014 patch-for-mkctm-v05 cd /usr/src/usr.sbin/ctm # Current .svn_revision 308337 .ctm_status src-cur 12729 patch < /pub/FreeBSD/development/CTM/svn-cur/patch-for-ctm-v09 Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [y] n n # OK, that patch seems to be in current. patch < /pub/FreeBSD/development/CTM/svn-cur/patch-for-ctm_rmail Hunk #1 succeeded at 152 (offset 2 lines). Hunk #2 succeeded at 201 with fuzz 1 (offset 2 lines). # NOT IN CURRENT ! patch '. Plain text, No .doc, base64, HTML, quoted-printable. http://berklix.eu/brexit/#stolen_votes