From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Mar 27 09:08:19 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2D35ADCDE4 for ; Sun, 27 Mar 2016 09:08:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1A3E1D5D for ; Sun, 27 Mar 2016 09:08:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id D0FE0ADCDE2; Sun, 27 Mar 2016 09:08:19 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE441ADCDE1 for ; Sun, 27 Mar 2016 09:08:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.freebsd.org (portscout.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C29351D5C for ; Sun, 27 Mar 2016 09:08:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.123]) by portscout.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u2R98JL4010986 for ; Sun, 27 Mar 2016 09:08:19 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id u2R98J7o010977; Sun, 27 Mar 2016 09:08:19 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201603270908.u2R98J7o010977@portscout.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2016 09:08:19 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2016 09:08:20 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ x11-wm/jwm | 2.3.4 | 2.3.5 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Thanks. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Mar 27 16:06:12 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F137AADFD33; Sun, 27 Mar 2016 16:06:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from smtp208.alice.it (smtp208.alice.it [82.57.200.104]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D03D1BB5; Sun, 27 Mar 2016 16:06:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from soth.ventu (82.58.25.117) by smtp208.alice.it (8.6.060.28) (authenticated as acanedi@alice.it) id 56F2B42E025EFDCC; Sun, 27 Mar 2016 18:06:02 +0200 Received: from alamar.ventu (alamar.ventu [10.1.2.18]) by soth.ventu (8.15.2/8.14.9) with ESMTP id u2RG61hJ073084; Sun, 27 Mar 2016 18:06:01 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) From: Andrea Venturoli To: gecko@FreeBSD.org Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: HTML5 videos crashes Firefox Message-ID: <56F804E9.8050506@netfence.it> Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2016 18:06:01 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2016 16:06:13 -0000 Hello. Since a week or two my FireFox crashes as soon as an HTML5 video starts playing. This can be sistematically reproduced, for example, by opening YouTube and selecting a random video. Notice I'm not that intrested in such videos, I just hate it when I open a page with one on it (possibly advertisement) and the 25 opened windows/tabs suddenly die. Nothing is printed on the terminal apart from "Bus error (core dumped)". Obviously the core file is useless, but I tried recompiling FireFox with debug symbols and that didn't make it any more readable (only some ?? in the stack trace). "portupgrade -Rf firefox" was only a waste of time. I switched from GTK2 to GTK3 (which I think became the default in the meanwhile), but the crashes weren't affected. I deleted my config and rebuilt with default options, only to get the same behaviour. I read disabling ALSA might solve, but it didn't (besides, it was enabled before the crashes started). I remembered in the past we had to load sem.ko, but it didn't help either. So I'm just looking for any hint that could help me get on the right track to debug this. TIA to anyone who will answer. Some info: > % uname -a > FreeBSD alamar.ventu 10.2-RELEASE-p14 FreeBSD 10.2-RELEASE-p14 #5 r297011: Fri Mar 18 10:48:43 CET 2016 root@alamar.ventu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/ALAMAR i386 > % ident /usr/ports/www/firefox/Makefile > /usr/ports/www/firefox/Makefile: > $FreeBSD: head/www/firefox/Makefile 411909 2016-03-25 23:30:06Z jbeich $ bye av. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Mar 27 17:11:47 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88B6BADFA58; Sun, 27 Mar 2016 17:11:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from c.brinkhaus@t-online.de) Received: from mailout09.t-online.de (mailout09.t-online.de [194.25.134.84]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mailout00.t-online.de", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3438B1649; Sun, 27 Mar 2016 17:11:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from c.brinkhaus@t-online.de) Received: from fwd18.aul.t-online.de (fwd18.aul.t-online.de [172.20.26.244]) by mailout09.t-online.de (Postfix) with SMTP id 8415ED5FFC; Sun, 27 Mar 2016 19:03:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from esprimo.local (EA6WNQZ1rhYKX-wV6xGsQVpYaOaehLt+AW39yHOPaEckpQ9D65jFj9b3nABVqIcZ8t@[217.81.142.113]) by fwd18.t-online.de with (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) esmtp id 1akE5k-1YGlaC0; Sun, 27 Mar 2016 19:03:08 +0200 Received: from esprimo.local (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by esprimo.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9794245CD9D; Sun, 27 Mar 2016 19:03:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from chris@localhost) by esprimo.local (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id u2RH36Hh064071; Sun, 27 Mar 2016 19:03:06 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from chris) Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2016 19:03:06 +0200 From: Christoph Brinkhaus To: Andrea Venturoli Cc: gecko@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: HTML5 videos crashes Firefox Message-ID: <20160327170306.GA57504@esprimo.local> References: <56F804E9.8050506@netfence.it> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <56F804E9.8050506@netfence.it> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-ID: EA6WNQZ1rhYKX-wV6xGsQVpYaOaehLt+AW39yHOPaEckpQ9D65jFj9b3nABVqIcZ8t X-TOI-MSGID: fe3174c6-5519-44b9-b4cc-860bc5b1aca8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2016 17:11:47 -0000 On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 06:06:01PM +0200, Andrea Venturoli wrote: > Hello. > > Since a week or two my FireFox crashes as soon as an HTML5 video starts > playing. This can be sistematically reproduced, for example, by opening > YouTube and selecting a random video. > > Notice I'm not that intrested in such videos, I just hate it when I open > a page with one on it (possibly advertisement) and the 25 opened > windows/tabs suddenly die. > > > > Nothing is printed on the terminal apart from "Bus error (core dumped)". > Obviously the core file is useless, but I tried recompiling FireFox with > debug symbols and that didn't make it any more readable (only some ?? in > the stack trace). > "portupgrade -Rf firefox" was only a waste of time. > I switched from GTK2 to GTK3 (which I think became the default in the > meanwhile), but the crashes weren't affected. > I deleted my config and rebuilt with default options, only to get the > same behaviour. > I read disabling ALSA might solve, but it didn't (besides, it was > enabled before the crashes started). > I remembered in the past we had to load sem.ko, but it didn't help either. > > Hello Andrea, I have tried the first video I get from youtube without problems. May be you post an url where the crash occurs. The options I use are according to pkg info ALSA : on BUNDLED_CAIRO : off CANBERRA : off DBUS : on DEBUG : off DTRACE : off FFMPEG : on GCONF : off GIO : on GNOMEUI : off GTK2 : on GTK3 : off INTEGER_SAMPLES: off LIBPROXY : off OPTIMIZED_CFLAGS: off PGO : off PROFILE : off PULSEAUDIO : off TEST : off The version is 45.0.1,1 > > So I'm just looking for any hint that could help me get on the right > track to debug this. > TIA to anyone who will answer. > May be you try pkg_libchk from sysutils/bsdadminscripts if the libraries are in order. > > > > Some info: > > % uname -a > > FreeBSD alamar.ventu 10.2-RELEASE-p14 FreeBSD 10.2-RELEASE-p14 #5 r297011: Fri Mar 18 10:48:43 CET 2016 root@alamar.ventu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/ALAMAR i386 > Do you have an i386 kernel? I am not sure if there might be a possible issue. When I have started using FreeBSD I thought amd64 is just for AMD processors. But amd64 is also ok for Intel. > > % ident /usr/ports/www/firefox/Makefile > > /usr/ports/www/firefox/Makefile: > > $FreeBSD: head/www/firefox/Makefile 411909 2016-03-25 23:30:06Z jbeich $ This is likely the newest one. I am not completely up to date because I mostly upgrade only when there are vulnerabilities. > > bye > av. Kind regards, Christoph From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Mar 27 17:45:33 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84BFBADF385 for ; Sun, 27 Mar 2016 17:45:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsd@haps.ca) Received: from mail.haps.ca (mail.haps.ca [159.203.17.63]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 67B5A1BE5; Sun, 27 Mar 2016 17:45:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsd@haps.ca) Received: from authenticated-user (mail.haps.ca [159.203.17.63]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.haps.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AD26E1204BE; Sun, 27 Mar 2016 13:45:31 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=haps.ca; s=mail; t=1459100731; bh=Y2uXx2mVtM9ExSDLqXv+I++Q+yV6S1L9zEPZitxX0u8=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=NfpCbeXANc061aqCb49vITnG+ZBmqFfUAYQnJ31Cs1bDa1fLDF4+wcwHLNPhEJDqG 6rzUQWGvw6SD7bo/GWrpbT3WBCZdYoc1zByRplEF1BqxGmmEJw5SGRd+QHGNSUmyOQ snm6cYrXzt+tkJAtY0t4iyQAl/Y5M5AgHwIa459JXv+63SLVM1aeLoYo+4ON9DSi7N vNfu3ddi8OQ+XXspQ0thTuow8ghqMzMe9dJMUqYSsfD65ahFJZFKO3lHP2fnRhkk6J F0EEX4CeowEzdD8F1p8raQx30Ct/JbQUuEA5S6CWlBv6zlOuratW0ksxoJcjvHWE5+ nBNVkCvaTldZQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2016 13:45:31 -0400 From: bsd@haps.ca To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, doceng@freebsd.org Subject: print/ghostscript9-agpl-base Message-ID: <98cc86215392c21f9273ea38215e5bd9@haps.ca> X-Sender: bsd@haps.ca X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2016 17:45:33 -0000 Makefile:post-install-DOCS-on: post-install-docs files/Makefile.pcl3:post-install-docs: post-install-docs-pcl3 Unfortunately that's the only definition for post-install-docs, and it's wrapped (in files/Makefile.drivers_post): # pcl3 specific .if ${PORT_OPTIONS:MGS_pcl3} .include "${MASTERDIR}/files/Makefile.pcl3" .endif So enabling docs without enabling pcl3 gives you: make[1]: don't know how to make post-install-docs. Stop This is just another broken config dependency issue (already dealt with "undefined reference to `gdev_prn_open_planar'": http://marc.info/?l=freebsd-ports-bugs&m=135081301325108 circa 2012). I'm wondering if all (or any) the print drivers need to be enabled by default. I don't know if there are any DEC LA50s still out there, and speaking personally my HP DeskJet 550C ran out of ink about 20 years ago, but my guess is that enabling that by default isn't going to be helpful to the vast majority of users. Perhaps it's time to reduce the number of options and provide, say, a single group of deprecated drivers for those who need them, so the more current/useful options aren't hidden in the cruft. I'll admit to knowing not much at all about gs, so maybe there's some reason why things have to be this way. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Mar 27 17:50:10 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 207C5ADF423 for ; Sun, 27 Mar 2016 17:50:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsd@haps.ca) Received: from mail.haps.ca (mail.haps.ca [159.203.17.63]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC81D1CCB for ; Sun, 27 Mar 2016 17:50:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsd@haps.ca) Received: from authenticated-user (mail.haps.ca [159.203.17.63]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.haps.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 089CC12006F; Sun, 27 Mar 2016 13:43:53 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=haps.ca; s=mail; t=1459100634; bh=t4Mjdi0yfv9d/SgMVI9uNX/YT77XxWa+n/0yPeBS0zs=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=gubVWjUVX+8oS8UjvlF8qeRd08l/N/NqzG2rkzxi6VoGE/8jxQPlpJFW9mPSzQPcK M6zkM4xvwQWXZqimON8l2TdwLjb/yHzYpwyovneZbsaM0SeS4yKghQKT1BxZj37K8T XYYqRf+9HVP6zzIXISX4VGJnhm4QpCcPxtv7qHjpTug5nGBqGLiWrxP4EEAz6uv9lX KlveW6y3T2xIzzGEXtjtSTF7zyLOwPFpDWPCX/2H0jII1Q27AnpYRtcmcx+kj1sXtG 4Kgo20tdpwKKqCm6VzO0d3h5FcR4AiRUO8DUMCwfjOB7AvqCjMwYEePhNgT8Alpygz ZLgPfcK4RE0CA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2016 13:43:53 -0400 From: bsd@haps.ca To: cyberbotx@cyberbotx.com, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: print/cups-filters Message-ID: X-Sender: bsd@haps.ca X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2016 17:50:10 -0000 In keeping with current fashion, ports seem to be provided with fewer options and more things sucked in by default. Please don't force dbus on the rest of us, thanks: --- Makefile.orig 2016-03-27 13:38:13.277556000 -0400 +++ Makefile 2016-03-27 13:00:07.083467000 -0400 @@ -16,7 +16,6 @@ libijs.so:${PORTSDIR}/print/libijs \ liblcms2.so:${PORTSDIR}/graphics/lcms2 \ libqpdf.so:${PORTSDIR}/print/qpdf \ - libdbus-1.so:${PORTSDIR}/devel/dbus \ libcupsimage.so:${PORTSDIR}/print/cups \ libfreetype.so:${PORTSDIR}/print/freetype2 \ libfontconfig.so:${PORTSDIR}/x11-fonts/fontconfig \ @@ -43,13 +42,15 @@ LIBS+= -L${LOCALBASE}/lib USE_LDCONFIG= yes -OPTIONS_DEFINE= AVAHI DOCS +OPTIONS_DEFINE= AVAHI DOCS DBUS OPTIONS_DEFAULT=AVAHI AVAHI_CONFIGURE_ENABLE= avahi AVAHI_LIB_DEPENDS= libavahi-client.so:${PORTSDIR}/net/avahi-app AVAHI_SUB_LIST= AVAHI_DAEMON=avahi_daemon AVAHI_SUB_LIST_OFF= AVAHI_DAEMON= +DBUS_CONFIGURE_ENABLE= dbus +DBUS_LIB_DEPENDS= libdbus-1.so:${PORTSDIR}/devel/dbus post-patch: @${REINPLACE_CMD} 's:-std=c++0x:-std=c++11:' ${WRKSRC}/Makefile.in From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Mar 27 18:32:47 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3867ADFEC1 for ; Sun, 27 Mar 2016 18:32:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cyberbotx@cyberbotx.com) Received: from resqmta-ch2-08v.sys.comcast.net (resqmta-ch2-08v.sys.comcast.net [IPv6:2001:558:fe21:29:69:252:207:40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C6AEA1B1F for ; Sun, 27 Mar 2016 18:32:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cyberbotx@cyberbotx.com) Received: from resomta-ch2-07v.sys.comcast.net ([69.252.207.103]) by comcast with SMTP id kFUNamiiaoR9jkFUTaIjdw; Sun, 27 Mar 2016 18:32:45 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20140121; t=1459103565; bh=AY/GAvZeYEpeWldYx8EPgpFKSz882TpctsnhnbuiLcM=; h=Received:Received:Received:Message-ID:Date:Subject:From:To: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=bawg+v2lRgGEqKm+QeuYmNbd2CO09iaI6a5/GQ+u7UrGKEL5/pmOAL6+QgumpSIjV QZgdwoCMFxPBZ6C3Li0ACKHBjEPIt+rIfQ0liKI0UlmyE88Bd+acuXUqKTaPykE9RY GYNWqHT6OOpty4dr9WHpNg7X+L/Sv8XY320bWxDawMgp3Brv8zR1xM9Ifaa+roRY/h iejsc4PVMYpb4VEQ60lq7JwI/B+RiV6fYV4rB0m/Epjvjup0c/l3goSUUKFU57ma5R hFG3M6ys6E3NAvFCarDvcMJ03JuDwalPKdAlv0RyLbbKU7gW4S3MwYcSK+S6UqOqWB 3x99iNjtmqaDA== Received: from www.cyberbotx.com ([68.37.67.123]) by resomta-ch2-07v.sys.comcast.net with comcast id b6Yj1s00K2fa3tg016YjJR; Sun, 27 Mar 2016 18:32:45 +0000 Received: from 192.168.2.1 (SquirrelMail authenticated user cyberbotx) by www.cyberbotx.com with HTTP; Sun, 27 Mar 2016 14:32:45 -0400 Message-ID: <06fe79d2d2b7cfce8115e14da9a0139f.squirrel@www.cyberbotx.com> In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2016 14:32:45 -0400 Subject: Re: print/cups-filters From: "Naram Qashat" To: bsd@haps.ca Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.23 [SVN] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2016 18:32:48 -0000 > In keeping with current fashion, ports seem to be provided with fewer > options and more things sucked in by default. > Please don't force dbus on the rest of us, thanks: > > --- Makefile.orig 2016-03-27 13:38:13.277556000 -0400 > +++ Makefile 2016-03-27 13:00:07.083467000 -0400 > @@ -16,7 +16,6 @@ > libijs.so:${PORTSDIR}/print/libijs \ > liblcms2.so:${PORTSDIR}/graphics/lcms2 \ > libqpdf.so:${PORTSDIR}/print/qpdf \ > - libdbus-1.so:${PORTSDIR}/devel/dbus \ > libcupsimage.so:${PORTSDIR}/print/cups \ > libfreetype.so:${PORTSDIR}/print/freetype2 \ > libfontconfig.so:${PORTSDIR}/x11-fonts/fontconfig \ > @@ -43,13 +42,15 @@ > LIBS+= -L${LOCALBASE}/lib > USE_LDCONFIG= yes > > -OPTIONS_DEFINE= AVAHI DOCS > +OPTIONS_DEFINE= AVAHI DOCS DBUS > OPTIONS_DEFAULT=AVAHI > > AVAHI_CONFIGURE_ENABLE= avahi > AVAHI_LIB_DEPENDS= libavahi-client.so:${PORTSDIR}/net/avahi-app > AVAHI_SUB_LIST= AVAHI_DAEMON=avahi_daemon > AVAHI_SUB_LIST_OFF= AVAHI_DAEMON= > +DBUS_CONFIGURE_ENABLE= dbus > +DBUS_LIB_DEPENDS= libdbus-1.so:${PORTSDIR}/devel/dbus > > post-patch: > @${REINPLACE_CMD} 's:-std=c++0x:-std=c++11:' ${WRKSRC}/Makefile.in If you submit this to bugzilla along with build testing, then I will approve it. I currently do not have the time to look into doing this myself as I am in the middle of moving over to a new desktop. Thanks, Naram Qashat From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Mar 27 19:02:07 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05AF6ADF20E for ; Sun, 27 Mar 2016 19:02:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "wonkity.com", Issuer "wonkity.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C8B9514EB for ; Sun, 27 Mar 2016 19:02:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id u2RJ22Cc087305 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 27 Mar 2016 13:02:02 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) with ESMTP id u2RJ22Xi087302; Sun, 27 Mar 2016 13:02:02 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2016 13:02:02 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: "Janky Jay, III" cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Torfinn Ingolfsen , leres@ee.lbl.gov Subject: Re: devel/arduino - bad advice given in pkg-message In-Reply-To: <56F71D44.1080302@unfs.us> Message-ID: References: <56F55A84.6080000@unfs.us> <56F71D44.1080302@unfs.us> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (BSF 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Sun, 27 Mar 2016 13:02:02 -0600 (MDT) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2016 19:02:07 -0000 On Sat, 26 Mar 2016, Janky Jay, III wrote: > Hi Torfinn, > > On 03/25/2016 10:20 AM, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote: >> On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 4:34 PM, Janky Jay, III >> wrote: >>> >>> While your solution is not incorrect, your assumption on the >>> proposed/given solution from the port is. The '-G' switch appends >>> the given group to your users already given groups. So, if a user >>> belongs to groups admin,wheel,test and you run the suggested "pw" >>> command from the port, your user will now be in groups >>> admin,wheel,test,dialer. It's the '-g' (lower-case) switch you >>> want to avoid... >>> >> >> If you read the man page, I think you will find that it is your >> assumption about what the '-G' switch does which is incorrect. >> Quote: "-G grouplist" "Set additional group memberships for an >> account. grouplist is a comma, space or tab-separated list of >> group names or group numbers. The user's name is added to the >> group lists in /etc/group, and removed from any groups not >> specified in grouplist." >> >> Please note the part which says "and removed from any groups not >> specified in grouplist" >> > > Ah yes! You are correct! For some reason I was mixing my "pw usermod" > and Linux "usermod" (where you use the -aG to append). My fault > entirely. Continue with your correct request for the update of the > false information. *fades into background* For what it's worth, I wrote that message, and (try to) always test things like that to make sure they work. It seems I missed that, though. The way those options are explained in pw(8) is misleading. Apparently "additional" was used in the sense of "all groups that are not the primary group", not in the sensing of adding groups. Here is the current version (rewrapped): -G grouplist Set additional group memberships for an account. grouplist is a comma, space or tab-separated list of group names or group numbers. The user's name is added to the group lists in /etc/group, and removed from any groups not specified in grouplist. Note: a user should not be added to their primary group with grouplist. Also, group membership changes do not take effect for current user login sessions, requiring the user to reconnect to be affected by the changes. Here is how I propose to rewrite that: -G grouplist Set secondary group memberships for an account. grouplist is a comma, space, or tab-separated list of group names or group numbers. /etc/group is modified to include the user's name in the groups specified in grouplist. The user's name is removed from all groups not specified. Group membership changes do not take effect for current user login sessions, requiring the user to reconnect to be affected by the changes. Note: do not add a user to their primary group with grouplist. Feedback welcome. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Mar 27 20:42:31 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF595ADF6A7 for ; Sun, 27 Mar 2016 20:42:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carmel_ny@outlook.com) Received: from BLU004-OMC3S2.hotmail.com (blu004-omc3s2.hotmail.com [65.55.116.77]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.outlook.com", Issuer "MSIT Machine Auth CA 2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 97F881FF5 for ; Sun, 27 Mar 2016 20:42:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carmel_ny@outlook.com) Received: from BLU436-SMTP249 ([65.55.116.74]) by BLU004-OMC3S2.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.23008); Sun, 27 Mar 2016 13:41:23 -0700 X-TMN: [H5+kxuzbyISK5nS4TMQ6KJx8mkELRfai] X-Originating-Email: [carmel_ny@outlook.com] Message-ID: Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2016 16:41:08 -0400 From: Carmel To: FreeBSD Ports Subject: Samba43 fail Organization: Seibercom NET X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.13.2 (GTK+ 2.24.28; i686-w64-mingw32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 27 Mar 2016 20:41:23.0332 (UTC) FILETIME=[068D4440:01D18869] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2016 20:42:32 -0000 I just updated gnutls and then attemped to update samba43. That failed. Attempting to start samba43 fails. Running "testparm" produces this output: Shared object "libgnutls.so.28" not found, required by "libauthkrb5-samba4.so". -- Carmel From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Mar 28 01:01:29 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 275E3AE0EFB for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 01:01:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: from mail-io0-x22c.google.com (mail-io0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E55EB153A for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 01:01:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: by mail-io0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id g185so6387334ioa.2 for ; Sun, 27 Mar 2016 18:01:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc; bh=QYRRGuWplppBMAtayaIpQjcOrjQxtyawtLIrriGQ0IU=; b=RSDI57YqDv72X7PuD8UZOwI3Y3IthgAvmNwI5/yQrdx5fXmAh0YKCjIM5C6X7eDckL OAVuZStBMdWusvdELNwf2dg/OodYtQvO6Vs9PKfNaR5hAR8WYWe3yqmJeozVoiospUH8 5ndPqxnGRrg2YtVu5iYjVoO8dM++r0SlfzsxJugEKDTwtHRxwM4i2OLaAkxTUb5O261W XyI2mh2jBxv31EdhAkKCNA4NEYcZHruunhe5yirz5EFGoyXgMKP48C8Uiwj/d3B9gU6p yHx2t/rl0XLplrVz/DVIGy7QYEN/Lq2k0yLZ0EYSQwMCUlOPEw/5wNaM/vS5betPIOfM 37/g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=QYRRGuWplppBMAtayaIpQjcOrjQxtyawtLIrriGQ0IU=; b=OQ67Ij6NeIcMLqg+i+l/wyB2V2JJ8eJxva4SjimZN1QXb71mueXnk7btl9TUS6IBgE mKggowFLWd6Zg/CJCfeM+5rhcsLIOtpkxOiuBmrZd2kjF3vmmhsIJjUK3KoAlXPEpmYb OwLPQQUiVM03mW/QBMwyNjJdu0z9tn27CjXCKBgmsEFm2LLBuEZCTKAiwvxkih/0Gxfv 6KKK1ExgGV1tLHh/RkS17Ro4BIhKl04ZIFQR0uyqmycPbFYO3D0SzrOImTNtBq3x4xMq qcwPZ1ujdTW9bUwvDB4KXx3gIzTj/JYGz6UlyJ/5iK69FWoCnD1szgsD6Xs13FGtxHt+ Djfw== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJIY6s9TVqwrjxR0WMUyDq20w+e9EDTfjcb8F4rrNu8ZNvsDTP3MGP25cA6zSnh/sDt/65cU068zUqvXSA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.107.47.41 with SMTP id j41mr22159290ioo.168.1459126887733; Sun, 27 Mar 2016 18:01:27 -0700 (PDT) Sender: kob6558@gmail.com Received: by 10.79.35.31 with HTTP; Sun, 27 Mar 2016 18:01:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2016 18:01:27 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: sXLk_g8cjHSwIysBETmtHIkEmsU Message-ID: Subject: Re: Samba43 fail From: Kevin Oberman To: Carmel Cc: FreeBSD Ports Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.21 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2016 01:01:29 -0000 On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 1:41 PM, Carmel wrote: > I just updated gnutls and then attemped to update samba43. That failed. > Attempting to start samba43 fails. Running "testparm" produces this > output: > > Shared object "libgnutls.so.28" not found, required by > "libauthkrb5-samba4.so". > > -- > Carmel > The error indicates that this port (samba43) was not updated after gnutls was updated and is still linked to the old version. the old version installed the .so.28 while hte nes one installes .so.30. gutls was just updated to using libgnutls.so.30 about 9 hours ago, so you may have updated it shortly after updating samba. All samba4 ports had their revisions updated at the same time as gnutls. Hopefully you did not tru updating both at the same time. This is never very safe. -- Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer E-mail: rkoberman@gmail.com PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683 From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Mar 28 03:43:08 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B79F6ADFF5B for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 03:43:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsd@haps.ca) Received: from mail.haps.ca (mail.haps.ca [159.203.17.63]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 914A916D1 for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 03:43:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsd@haps.ca) Received: from authenticated-user (mail.haps.ca [159.203.17.63]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.haps.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C6C7412006F; Sun, 27 Mar 2016 23:42:36 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=haps.ca; s=mail; t=1459136556; bh=/tG4ChHj6NmOOThwpgtBzH8L7ht9Sj5HCVDqKyD9hw4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=npW9ghLJtzSSC6cb9yyyNQhKlHnZsBOORQN4GeSA6BM0niNLJBDCYkXMNGHQrfj3z A3hJ2j9/5iXMCbUtK1UYa+EMwNLFyBNdX7eziAXPi9S1qHYaB/k8LqS2iZ3/Rihra6 WTxRdRGZdDjV5WAfvnT9kiwZEGzjKBBbKqYjNkZ2rTfkB3mnveqPkS6wZNMvIZ2em3 QlKUnOAOTnrydhmabsfy/l/SFvJ1GU7SIqqcGzWunOqZ7WoUjcjoA1GRpSWRZ9B+0v cKILdjju4/+Kq1/CPT1Of4qxET7X3fYlm7L2dzzC33nfLDlpDvB5foXwAsIEukJAJ7 vf6LKPSNDTnRQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2016 23:42:36 -0400 From: bsd@haps.ca To: Naram Qashat Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: print/cups-filters In-Reply-To: <06fe79d2d2b7cfce8115e14da9a0139f.squirrel@www.cyberbotx.com> References: <06fe79d2d2b7cfce8115e14da9a0139f.squirrel@www.cyberbotx.com> Message-ID: <54cb585b02532ce4402168192c8e08a5@haps.ca> X-Sender: bsd@haps.ca X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2016 03:43:08 -0000 On 2016-03-27 14:32, Naram Qashat wrote: [...] > If you submit this to bugzilla along with build testing, then I will > approve it. I currently do not have the time to look into doing this > myself as I am in the middle of moving over to a new desktop. I'm not sure what else is needed for testing, but I've added a bug: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208345 From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Mar 28 03:56:11 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15310AE00D4 for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 03:56:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "wonkity.com", Issuer "wonkity.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C8F6E1A9A for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 03:56:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id u2S3u7ol023011 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 27 Mar 2016 21:56:07 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) with ESMTP id u2S3u5Ds023008; Sun, 27 Mar 2016 21:56:07 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2016 21:56:05 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: "Janky Jay, III" cc: Torfinn Ingolfsen , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, leres@ee.lbl.gov Subject: Re: devel/arduino - bad advice given in pkg-message In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <56F55A84.6080000@unfs.us> <56F71D44.1080302@unfs.us> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (BSF 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Sun, 27 Mar 2016 21:56:07 -0600 (MDT) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2016 03:56:11 -0000 On Sun, 27 Mar 2016, Warren Block wrote: > Here is how I propose to rewrite that: > > -G grouplist Set secondary group memberships for an account. > grouplist is a comma, space, or tab-separated list of > group names or group numbers. /etc/group is modified > to include the user's name in the groups specified in > grouplist. The user's name is removed from all > groups not specified. Group membership changes do not > take effect for current user login sessions, > requiring the user to reconnect to be affected by the > changes. Note: do not add a user to their primary > group with grouplist. Modified version committed in https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/head/usr.sbin/pw/pw.8?r1=297330&r2=297329&pathrev=297330 From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Mar 28 08:48:36 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D098AE0911 for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 08:48:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BE041C67 for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 08:48:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 0B38CAE090A; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 08:48:36 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AE3CAE0909 for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 08:48:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.freebsd.org (portscout.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F35591C66 for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 08:48:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.123]) by portscout.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u2S8mZOO081285 for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 08:48:35 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id u2S8mZF8081284; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 08:48:35 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201603280848.u2S8mZF8081284@portscout.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2016 08:48:35 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2016 08:48:36 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ devel/py-jep | 3.5.0 | 3.5.1 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ print/lilypond-devel | 2.19.11 | 2.19.39 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Thanks. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Mar 28 08:48:51 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6824CAE0987 for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 08:48:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marko.cupac@mimar.rs) Received: from mail.mimar.rs (mail1.mimar.rs [193.53.106.128]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 240C31D4C for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 08:48:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marko.cupac@mimar.rs) Received: from mail1.mimar.rs (localhost [127.0.1.128]) by mail.mimar.rs (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87DC845CDAE5 for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 10:48:41 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=mimar.rs; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:mime-version :x-mailer:organization:message-id:subject:subject:from:from:date :date:received:received; s=mimar-0901; t=1459154911; x= 1460969312; bh=Qw/fdDe7jW52Ey9gqJJkY7CbcsPBaDRviMuYMh4ZfHE=; b=j N9hsIZ4VE8PIarYFnqxM3AGxCuokmZbqALjWe/09lh0O4MRkrbydcgICreEkUECK 7TmaAIYHG14fJ+2puhUJziIVIIRclu1u6cn1tPUasB9uGywi2dMnbc57C7VTT7Vi Omu7Ni9IIEsu2/2+rFe7shbN3gjbr+7Sy4F2WF0a78= X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mimar.rs Received: from mail.mimar.rs ([127.0.1.128]) by mail1.mimar.rs (amavis.mimar.rs [127.0.1.128]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with LMTP id E5RwqnKvpD_5 for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 10:48:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from efreet (nat-nat.kappastar.com [193.53.106.34]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: marko.cupac@mimar.rs) by mail.mimar.rs (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6908345CDAE0 for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 10:48:31 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2016 10:48:30 +0200 From: Marko =?UTF-8?B?Q3VwYcSH?= To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: www/c-icap ListenAddress directive missing from sample conf Message-ID: <20160328104830.50989662@efreet> Organization: Mimar X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.3 (GTK+ 2.24.23; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2016 08:48:51 -0000 Hi, I am testing c-icap in FreeBSD Jail environment, and I've noticed that c-icap binds to all interfaces by default. c-icap.conf.sample has nothing about binding to specific address. I asked on c-icap-users mailing list, and it appears c-icap can be configured for binding to specific ip address with ListenAddress directive: https://sourceforge.net/p/c-icap/mailman/message/34970656/ Perhaps it could be added to c-icap.conf.sample? --=20 Before enlightenment - chop wood, draw water. After enlightenment - chop wood, draw water. Marko Cupa=C4=87 https://www.mimar.rs/ From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Mar 28 10:30:21 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEC0DAE0D9A for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 10:30:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carmel_ny@outlook.com) Received: from BLU004-OMC3S35.hotmail.com (blu004-omc3s35.hotmail.com [65.55.116.110]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.outlook.com", Issuer "MSIT Machine Auth CA 2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C65D1A0C for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 10:30:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carmel_ny@outlook.com) Received: from BLU436-SMTP212 ([65.55.116.74]) by BLU004-OMC3S35.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.23008); Mon, 28 Mar 2016 02:58:33 -0700 X-TMN: [Uc7aDzGUZ0BD2kuLgGEcudzvNe8Z4SAW] X-Originating-Email: [carmel_ny@outlook.com] Message-ID: Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2016 05:58:18 -0400 From: Carmel To: FreeBSD Ports Subject: Re: Samba43 fail In-Reply-To: References: Organization: Seibercom NET X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.13.2 (GTK+ 2.24.28; i686-w64-mingw32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Mar 2016 09:58:32.0557 (UTC) FILETIME=[62FDD1D0:01D188D8] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2016 10:30:21 -0000 On Sun, 27 Mar 2016 18:01:27 -0700, Kevin Oberman stated: >The error indicates that this port (samba43) was not updated after >gnutls was updated and is still linked to the old version. the old >version installed the .so.28 while hte nes one installes .so.30. > >gutls was just updated to using libgnutls.so.30 about 9 hours ago, so >you may have updated it shortly after updating samba. All samba4 ports >had their revisions updated at the same time as gnutls. Hopefully you >did not tru updating both at the same time. This is never very safe. Actually, I was using "portupgrade" to update all of the outdated applications. Even after updating everything and rebooting, "samba43" failed to build. I then did a pkg delete on the samba43 port and tried to install it again. Everything worked fine. This is an excerpt from the original build log that failed. Notice that there is nothing about a missing or incorrect library. I am not sure exactly how this works. I assume that samba43 did not check to make sure it was the correct version at this point in the build. ===> Fetching all distfiles required by samba43-4.3.3_2 for building ===> Extracting for samba43-4.3.3_2 => SHA256 Checksum OK for samba-4.3.3.tar.gz. ===> Patching for samba43-4.3.3_2 ===> Applying extra patch /usr/ports/net/samba43/files/extra-patch-security ===> Applying FreeBSD patches for samba43-4.3.3_2 ===> samba43-4.3.3_2 depends on package: libarchive>=3.1.2 - found ===> samba43-4.3.3_2 depends on package: p5-Parse-Pidl>=4.3.1 - found ===> samba43-4.3.3_2 depends on package: py27-dnspython>=1.9.4 - found ===> samba43-4.3.3_2 depends on package: talloc>=2.1.5 - found ===> samba43-4.3.3_2 depends on package: tevent>=0.9.25 - found ===> samba43-4.3.3_2 depends on package: tdb>=1.3.8 - found ===> samba43-4.3.3_2 depends on package: ldb>=1.1.24 - found ===> samba43-4.3.3_2 depends on executable: pkgconf - found ===> samba43-4.3.3_2 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/python2.7 - found ===> samba43-4.3.3_2 depends on executable: python2 - found ===> samba43-4.3.3_2 depends on package: libiconv>=1.14_9 - found ===> samba43-4.3.3_2 depends on package: perl5>=5.20<5.21 - found ===> samba43-4.3.3_2 depends on shared library: libpopt.so - found (/usr/local/lib/libpopt.so) ===> samba43-4.3.3_2 depends on shared library: libinotify.so - found (/usr/local/lib/libinotify.so) ===> samba43-4.3.3_2 depends on shared library: libsasl2.so - found (/usr/local/lib/libsasl2.so) ===> samba43-4.3.3_2 depends on shared library: libgcrypt.so - found (/usr/local/lib/libgcrypt.so) ===> samba43-4.3.3_2 depends on shared library: libgnutls.so - found (/usr/local/lib/libgnutls.so) ===> samba43-4.3.3_2 depends on shared library: libsunacl.so - found (/usr/local/lib/libsunacl.so) ===> samba43-4.3.3_2 depends on shared library: libsunacl.so - found (/usr/local/lib/libsunacl.so) ===> samba43-4.3.3_2 depends on shared library: libreadline.so.6 - found (/usr/local/lib/libreadline.so.6) ===> samba43-4.3.3_2 depends on shared library: libfam.so.0 - found (/usr/local/lib/libfam.so.0) ===> samba43-4.3.3_2 depends on shared library: libldap-2.4.so.2 - found (/usr/local/lib/libldap-2.4.so.2) ===> Configuring for samba43-4.3.3_2 In any case, thanks for your reply. -- Carmel From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Mar 28 10:32:56 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF974AE0F93 for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 10:32:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AFB941D32 for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 10:32:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.86_2 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1akUTf-0003MH-Is; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 12:32:55 +0200 Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2016 12:32:55 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Carmel Cc: FreeBSD Ports Subject: Re: Samba43 fail Message-ID: <20160328103255.GU35640@home.opsec.eu> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2016 10:32:57 -0000 Hi! > This is an excerpt from the original build log that failed. Notice that > there is nothing about a missing or incorrect library. I am not sure > exactly how this works. I assume that samba43 did not check to make > sure it was the correct version at this point in the build. There are cases where having the old version installed causes the build of the new version to fail. See https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193371 Maybe this is something similar. -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 4 years to go ! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Mar 28 13:22:34 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FB3DAE0890 for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 13:22:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dcarrick223@comcast.net) Received: from resqmta-ch2-01v.sys.comcast.net (resqmta-ch2-01v.sys.comcast.net [IPv6:2001:558:fe21:29:69:252:207:33]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "Client", Issuer "CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 63BBE1C0E for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 13:22:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dcarrick223@comcast.net) Received: from resomta-ch2-03v.sys.comcast.net ([69.252.207.99]) by comcast with SMTP id kX5Qa2OJNrxJ7kX7na6ExR; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 13:22:31 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20140121; t=1459171351; bh=f4PgoKx1MhIZ+CvXJBGaapK2e5aSYlEjQJ2GncpeaNk=; h=Received:Received:Date:Subject:Message-ID:From:To:MIME-Version: Content-Type; b=CzBna7yucP6g9YqgPGWYr0t5oX6W5S6s/P2jFmzukTRnaE8fyy2lBm1MOvLQGiKfb zxQ2SotlpCkjbZ7c/N2xOt1w05VG7vrYE5x97YVrrEXrparpMfV/NEYWtAf5JucmZr zORIFGmgDdMvAhOOHxA7djwwDIGbgwLZNPl/gWreKw5wWvqlvsmOrjZuUsU+gOn62z TkKPfaSFV0id7NpvhlHo/zdh8rHDc9+MTKwGIsExLiEfXGJCx2fNHoYThModpRXLCP NM6QI7oQZq5GlfAa5UTBgNvhdS9zVQh3ZwPo778KUOzi3LFBVaiK6fKdvfss4HOV7W ve8piqvN9tq2Q== Received: from [IPv6:2601:18a:8100:a409:cdfb:252c:91dd:3f09] ([IPv6:2601:18a:8100:a409:cdfb:252c:91dd:3f09]) by resomta-ch2-03v.sys.comcast.net with comcast id bRNW1s0011ejncY01RNWHK; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 13:22:31 +0000 Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2016 09:22:28 -0400 Subject: Wal-Mart Secret Shopper Needed! Apply Now!!! Message-ID: From: dcarrick223 To: "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.21 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2016 13:22:34 -0000 Appying for secret shopper at Walmart,please let me know what time and days.Thank You Sent from my Verizon 4G LTE Smartphone From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Mar 28 16:50:56 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B495AE055A for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 16:50:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kremels@kreme.com) Received: from mail.covisp.net (mail.covisp.net [65.121.55.42]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 251FA1E57 for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 16:50:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kremels@kreme.com) Received: from mail.covisp.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.covisp.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3qYfzr2s8tzpKvZ; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 10:50:48 -0600 (MDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at covisp.net Received: from mail.covisp.net ([127.0.0.1]) by mail.covisp.net (mail.covisp.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id O-cZAIZ1qeIT; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 10:50:38 -0600 (MDT) From: "@lbutlr" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Webmin fails to download Message-Id: <2B5E49AD-5F00-4DE8-BF7C-6C9D004000EF@kreme.com> Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2016 10:50:37 -0600 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2016 16:50:56 -0000 When trying to install webmin via ports, all I get is =3D=3D=3D>>> Waiting on fetch & checksum for sysutils/webmin <<<=3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D> License BSD3CLAUSE accepted by the user =3D=3D=3D> webmin-1.780 depends on file: /usr/local/sbin/pkg - found =3D> webmin-1.780.tar.gz doesn't seem to exist in = /usr/ports/distfiles//. =3D> Attempting to fetch = http://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/webadmin/webmin/1.780/webmin-1.78= 0.tar.gz webmin-1.780.tar.gz =20 Over an over. I can download the file directly via a browser (after sitting through = the stupid waiting period and add banner BS), but if I then copy = webmin-1.780.tar.gz to /usr/ports/distfiles manually, I still get the = exact same behavior. I assume this is because SF is dumb, but how do i get around it? --=20 I told you... Don't call me Junior. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Mar 28 17:49:02 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B80DAE1661 for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 17:49:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: from ms-10.1blu.de (ms-10.1blu.de [178.254.4.101]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD3921030 for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 17:49:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: from [89.204.153.70] (helo=[10.45.23.70]) by ms-10.1blu.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1akajl-00019v-PR for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 19:13:58 +0200 From: Matthias Apitz To: Subject: Re: Webmin fails to download Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2016 19:13:52 +0200 User-Agent: Dekko/0.6.11; Qt/5.4.1; ubuntumirclient; Linux; MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <0e5514f9-7115-4829-b7d3-14edf3e7e792@unixarea.de> In-Reply-To: <2B5E49AD-5F00-4DE8-BF7C-6C9D004000EF@kreme.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Con-Id: 51246 X-Con-U: 0-guru X-Originating-IP: 89.204.153.70 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2016 17:49:02 -0000 On Monday, 28 March 2016 18:50:37 CEST, @lbutlr wrote: > When trying to install webmin via ports, all I get is >=20 > =3D=3D=3D>>> Waiting on fetch & checksum for sysutils/webmin <<<=3D=3D=3D > =3D=3D=3D> License BSD3CLAUSE accepted by the user > =3D=3D=3D> webmin-1.780 depends on file: /usr/local/sbin/pkg - found > =3D> webmin-1.780.tar.gz doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles//. > =3D> Attempting to fetch=20 > http://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/webadmin/webmin/1.780/webmin-1.780= .tar.gz > webmin-1.780.tar.gz =20 >=20 > Over an over. >=20 > I can download the file directly via a browser (after sitting=20 > through the stupid waiting period and add banner BS), but if I=20 > then copy webmin-1.780.tar.gz to /usr/ports/distfiles manually,=20 > I still get the exact same behavior. >=20 > I assume this is because SF is dumb, but how do i get around it? >=20 Start with checking/comparing file size and sha256 hash matthias --=20 Sent from my Ubuntu phone http://www.unixarea.de/ From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Mar 28 18:06:02 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19B8DAE1B74 for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 18:06:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CE5961D60 for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 18:06:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.86_2 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1akbYA-0003vN-QO; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 20:06:02 +0200 Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2016 20:06:02 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger To: "@lbutlr" Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Webmin fails to download Message-ID: <20160328180602.GV35640@home.opsec.eu> References: <2B5E49AD-5F00-4DE8-BF7C-6C9D004000EF@kreme.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2B5E49AD-5F00-4DE8-BF7C-6C9D004000EF@kreme.com> X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2016 18:06:02 -0000 Hi! > => Attempting to fetch http://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/webadmin/webmin/1.780/webmin-1.780.tar.gz > webmin-1.780.tar.gz > > Over an over. I just tried to download from sourceforge and it was successful. > I can download the file directly via a browser (after sitting > through the stupid waiting period and add banner BS), but if I then > copy webmin-1.780.tar.gz to /usr/ports/distfiles manually, I still > get the exact same behavior. This is strange. How big is the file directly downloaded ? What is its checksum ? -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 4 years to go ! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Mar 28 21:45:17 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD4D0AE154C for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 21:45:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tingox@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lf0-x233.google.com (mail-lf0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 55BB219B8 for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 21:45:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tingox@gmail.com) Received: by mail-lf0-x233.google.com with SMTP id c62so98805711lfc.1 for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 14:45:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=rE638vMNCkrColv5/c7Oxq2NyVmkWrCzctxzuV6ly5Q=; b=lmvtjnLhxsqspl5bYWB7XvekZRKDGNx/KA66TvmaHxnBcvasC0gwEmNe5mkQXe5lQT cgDnEbn1ZDv6SNGKv1zDJbeNWN7n0qplpbhhAGVSeEYHWJ4mw8lm8F1gxIPbArxWe4C4 SRUBOi0H5h/BQwkTXDmhzJxNlVANuDXhV2+PKKfD9yE3ANpqg6h85aLdVhkvSFwojTeZ VAWV0odx71DP3bN04PqHXA9dPjoIPfBS6LNV+nfVU+IEDa4zhYS83D6lvtI5tQ6lo8lE Mm+ZC57ysCvXb+9UaO44rkBIyhY5Sngd1f7SxmzI6UHFc1WsW/Uz++hvso+X6T9+6w0e qruw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to; bh=rE638vMNCkrColv5/c7Oxq2NyVmkWrCzctxzuV6ly5Q=; b=fkyRZIGTRGseDhmETv9Uc6DTslCglD9GNaO6dYGEauLH/HaoWHx6nelWjCmmrVGsZ2 XVRom6b8YrnaU/0JCtuAX8SjMjkkVwMlizrVbvSxpUyjK1CBFXmUmyXcPvInhErrzy1F OoLdzlMp4NIeY9e2HjYRyoBT5ICU5UyJQkNQiRGnzjOFnEauTO9k7kVuNl3qd/ATvO7q 7zjCFtMero3tUKiK6mC24lC0ETag/77Jyjj2qKjZhAVhYlmgK8v3VGtW3N6A94Y9+eXz SQP9JnquMiQOvylqzIcQVqnQ70kbnYXd6QsYQb/x2ylIWsydrBlKhymutHuldChv9Ayt LCTw== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJJGM4fQHOPfucSVsf+ZiaZNgyLJrRNaHbEoAl+3f7yySdamtHQiatfF4NoMwFzj3Na9DGqle5MT2r3HJg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.25.19.99 with SMTP id j96mr3664852lfi.114.1459201515607; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 14:45:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.25.206.137 with HTTP; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 14:45:15 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <56F55A84.6080000@unfs.us> <56F71D44.1080302@unfs.us> Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2016 23:45:15 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: devel/arduino - bad advice given in pkg-message From: Torfinn Ingolfsen To: FreeBSD Ports ML Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2016 21:45:17 -0000 On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 5:56 AM, Warren Block wrote: > On Sun, 27 Mar 2016, Warren Block wrote: > >> Here is how I propose to rewrite that: >> >> -G grouplist Set secondary group memberships for an account. >> grouplist is a comma, space, or tab-separated list of >> group names or group numbers. /etc/group is modified >> to include the user's name in the groups specified in >> grouplist. The user's name is removed from all >> groups not specified. Group membership changes do not >> take effect for current user login sessions, >> requiring the user to reconnect to be affected by the >> changes. Note: do not add a user to their primary >> group with grouplist. > > > Modified version committed in > https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/head/usr.sbin/pw/pw.8?r1=297330&r2=297329&pathrev=297330 Thanks! -- Ragards, Torfinn Ingolfsen From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Mar 28 23:20:25 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A86A0ADFA9B for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 23:20:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kremels@kreme.com) Received: from mail.covisp.net (mail.covisp.net [65.121.55.42]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 90F471EAF for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 23:20:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kremels@kreme.com) Received: from mail.covisp.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.covisp.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3qYqdK0yyHzpKtv; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 17:20:21 -0600 (MDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at covisp.net Received: from mail.covisp.net ([127.0.0.1]) by mail.covisp.net (mail.covisp.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZswB-Yi-4gOU; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 17:20:13 -0600 (MDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: Webmin fails to download From: "@lbutlr" In-Reply-To: <20160328180602.GV35640@home.opsec.eu> Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2016 17:20:10 -0600 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <2B5E49AD-5F00-4DE8-BF7C-6C9D004000EF@kreme.com> <20160328180602.GV35640@home.opsec.eu> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2016 23:20:25 -0000 On Mon Mar 28 2016 12:06:02 Kurt Jaeger said: >=20 > Hi! >=20 >> =3D> Attempting to fetch = http://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/webadmin/webmin/1.780/webmin-1.78= 0.tar.gz >> webmin-1.780.tar.gz =20 >>=20 >> Over an over. >=20 > I just tried to download from sourceforge and it was successful. Via postmaster or manually? I can download the file. > This is strange. >=20 > How big is the file directly downloaded ? What is its checksum ? MD5 (webmin-1.780.tar.gz) =3D d5de2ef2b47de718c7f1addbf0bc2e5c SHA256 (webmin-1.780.tar.gz) =3D = eb2613a4f4525cbbd04435580a843cb2a454bcf2712301105657cc114beda40e --=20 Honesty may be the best policy, but it's important to remember that apparently, by elimination, dishonesty is the second-best policy. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Mar 28 23:52:03 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6B33AE059E for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 23:52:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kremels@kreme.com) Received: from mail.covisp.net (mail.covisp.net [65.121.55.42]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CEBDA1043 for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 23:52:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kremels@kreme.com) Received: from mail.covisp.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.covisp.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3qYrKt6q4yzpKtv; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 17:52:02 -0600 (MDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at covisp.net Received: from mail.covisp.net ([127.0.0.1]) by mail.covisp.net (mail.covisp.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id U3QDI3yzEfSM; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 17:52:02 -0600 (MDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: Webmin fails to download From: "@lbutlr" In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2016 17:52:01 -0600 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <52C8EAF3-53F1-4517-BC2D-19AFD9FD1AB5@kreme.com> References: <2B5E49AD-5F00-4DE8-BF7C-6C9D004000EF@kreme.com> <20160328180602.GV35640@home.opsec.eu> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2016 23:52:04 -0000 On Mon Mar 28 2016 17:20:10 @lbutlr said: >=20 > MD5 (webmin-1.780.tar.gz) =3D d5de2ef2b47de718c7f1addbf0bc2e5c > SHA256 (webmin-1.780.tar.gz) =3D = eb2613a4f4525cbbd04435580a843cb2a454bcf2712301105657cc114beda40e Well, that was odd. After emailing I tried it again and it worked after failing all day = yesterday and this morning. Sigh. --=20 'That's blasphemy,' said the vampire. He gasped as Vimes shot him a glance like sunlight. 'That's what people say when the voiceless speak.' From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Mar 29 09:06:45 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD5D9AE1E39 for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2016 09:06:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC4E310AB for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2016 09:06:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id ABB1FAE1E38; Tue, 29 Mar 2016 09:06:45 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB5D1AE1E37 for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2016 09:06:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.freebsd.org (portscout.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9BD3F10AA for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2016 09:06:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.123]) by portscout.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u2T96jBl040668 for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2016 09:06:45 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id u2T96jlp040654; Tue, 29 Mar 2016 09:06:45 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201603290906.u2T96jlp040654@portscout.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 09:06:45 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 09:06:45 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ databases/luasql-mysql | 2.3.0 | v2.3.1 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ databases/luasql-postgres | 2.3.0 | v2.3.1 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ databases/luasql-sqlite3 | 2.3.0 | v2.3.1 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ textproc/elasticsearch-plugin-marvel | 1.3.1 | 2.3.0 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Thanks. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Mar 29 16:20:24 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E621DAE2D3A; Tue, 29 Mar 2016 16:20:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from smtp207.alice.it (smtp207.alice.it [82.57.200.103]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DF381812; Tue, 29 Mar 2016 16:20:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from soth.ventu (82.58.25.117) by smtp207.alice.it (8.6.060.28) (authenticated as acanedi@alice.it) id 56F2B387053B1B18; Tue, 29 Mar 2016 18:20:11 +0200 Received: from alamar.ventu (alamar.ventu [10.1.2.18]) by soth.ventu (8.15.2/8.14.9) with ESMTP id u2TGKDni052995; Tue, 29 Mar 2016 18:20:13 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Subject: Re: HTML5 videos crashes Firefox References: <56F804E9.8050506@netfence.it> Cc: gecko@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org From: Andrea Venturoli To: c.brinkhaus@t-online.de Message-ID: <56FAAB3D.10906@netfence.it> Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 18:20:13 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <56F804E9.8050506@netfence.it> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 16:20:25 -0000 On Sun, 27 Mar 2016 10:12:07 -0700, Christoph Brinkhaus wrote: > Hello Andrea, Hello and thanks for your help. > I have tried the first video I get from youtube without problems. > May be you post an url where the crash occurs. I can just go to youtube.it/com and choose a random one; e.g.: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hrJLzq_coUg https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LbVEXCh63pQ (Please forgive me for linking that crap, but you asked it :) > The options I use are > according to pkg info > ALSA : on > BUNDLED_CAIRO : off > CANBERRA : off > DBUS : on > DEBUG : off > DTRACE : off > FFMPEG : on > GCONF : off > GIO : on > GNOMEUI : off > GTK2 : on > GTK3 : off > INTEGER_SAMPLES: off > LIBPROXY : off > OPTIMIZED_CFLAGS: off > PGO : off > PROFILE : off > PULSEAUDIO : off > TEST : off I had: > ALSA : off > BUNDLED_CAIRO : on > CANBERRA : off > DBUS : on > DEBUG : off > DTRACE : on > FFMPEG : on > GCONF : off > GIO : on > GNOMEUI : off > GTK2 : off > GTK3 : on > INTEGER_SAMPLES: off > LIBPROXY : off > OPTIMIZED_CFLAGS: on > PGO : off > PROFILE : off > PULSEAUDIO : on > RUST : on > TEST : off However, I tried your set of options (with RUST on and off, since you don't have it): things didn't change, still crashing. > The version is 45.0.1,1 45.0.1_3,1, here, but I also went through 45.0.1,1, which crashed in the same way. > May be you try pkg_libchk from sysutils/bsdadminscripts > if the libraries are in order. I used sysutil/libchk, which should do more or less the same thing: there were some unresolved references in binaries which should not be related to FireFox: I solved that, but it's still crashing. Any other thing to check? > Do you have an i386 kernel? Yes. > I am not sure if there might be a possible issue. Any pointer on that? *If* firefox is incompatible with i386 I might switch, but it's going to be a very long work; so I'd like to get some hint about this before I venture myself in such a trouble. > When I have started using FreeBSD I thought amd64 is just for AMD processors. > But amd64 is also ok for Intel. I know the difference. However this box's install predates amd64: I was using it more than 10 years ago (5.x or 6.x possibly) and it's still there through several hardware and software upgrades. Until now I haven't found any good reason to drop everything and reinstall from scratch... > This is likely the newest one. I am not completely up to date because > I mostly upgrade only when there are vulnerabilities. So do I, but I've gone through every minor update since I'm experiencing these crashes. bye & Thanks av. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Mar 29 17:37:04 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3281AE2FFC; Tue, 29 Mar 2016 17:37:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from c.brinkhaus@t-online.de) Received: from mailout09.t-online.de (mailout09.t-online.de [194.25.134.84]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mailout00.t-online.de", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F0FD1027; Tue, 29 Mar 2016 17:37:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from c.brinkhaus@t-online.de) Received: from fwd33.aul.t-online.de (fwd33.aul.t-online.de [172.20.27.144]) by mailout09.t-online.de (Postfix) with SMTP id E2F8053A483; Tue, 29 Mar 2016 19:36:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: from esprimo.local (XZbGpkZQrhHanPAt0r35vusCigOwk6e+EUzlt03NfTY2lEaOYSPLXgESqv548-BgdE@[217.81.128.203]) by fwd33.t-online.de with (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) esmtp id 1akxZQ-0cxzhQ0; Tue, 29 Mar 2016 19:36:48 +0200 Received: from esprimo.local (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by esprimo.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C9EF45CD9D; Tue, 29 Mar 2016 19:36:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from chris@localhost) by esprimo.local (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id u2THakC9012045; Tue, 29 Mar 2016 19:36:46 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from chris) Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 19:36:46 +0200 From: Christoph Brinkhaus To: Andrea Venturoli Cc: gecko@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: HTML5 videos crashes Firefox Message-ID: <20160329173646.GA4619@esprimo.local> References: <56F804E9.8050506@netfence.it> <56FAAB3D.10906@netfence.it> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <56FAAB3D.10906@netfence.it> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-ID: XZbGpkZQrhHanPAt0r35vusCigOwk6e+EUzlt03NfTY2lEaOYSPLXgESqv548-BgdE X-TOI-MSGID: e0fe2aae-487a-4927-b782-f39ccb279875 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 17:37:04 -0000 On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 06:20:13PM +0200, Andrea Venturoli wrote: Hello Andrea! > On Sun, 27 Mar 2016 10:12:07 -0700, Christoph Brinkhaus wrote: > > > Hello Andrea, > > Hello and thanks for your help. > > > I have tried the first video I get from youtube without problems. > > May be you post an url where the crash occurs. > > I can just go to youtube.it/com and choose a random one; e.g.: > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hrJLzq_coUg > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LbVEXCh63pQ > > (Please forgive me for linking that crap, but you asked it :) Wonderful stuff. Now I know why we must spend more money for a fast internet;-). I have tried both videos on the firefox I build from sources for 1-2 minutes with privoxy enabled and no problems. The second works also on a firefox I have installed in a jail as package. It works also with privoxy disabled. I have not dared to do this for the first one. I have no idea who logs what... The only thing I get are error messages as below: $ ssh fox firefox libGL error: failed to open drm device: No such file or directory libGL error: failed to load driver: i965 libGL error: unable to load driver: swrast_dri.so libGL error: failed to load driver: swrast 1459272168729 addons.xpi WARN Bootstrap state is invalid (missing add-ons: I have no add-ons. > > > The options I use are > > according to pkg info > > ALSA : on > > BUNDLED_CAIRO : off > > CANBERRA : off > > DBUS : on > > DEBUG : off > > DTRACE : off > > FFMPEG : on > > GCONF : off > > GIO : on > > GNOMEUI : off > > GTK2 : on > > GTK3 : off > > INTEGER_SAMPLES: off > > LIBPROXY : off > > OPTIMIZED_CFLAGS: off > > PGO : off > > PROFILE : off > > PULSEAUDIO : off > > TEST : off > > I had: > > ALSA : off > > BUNDLED_CAIRO : on > > CANBERRA : off > > DBUS : on > > DEBUG : off > > DTRACE : on > > FFMPEG : on > > GCONF : off > > GIO : on > > GNOMEUI : off > > GTK2 : off > > GTK3 : on > > INTEGER_SAMPLES: off > > LIBPROXY : off > > OPTIMIZED_CFLAGS: on > > PGO : off > > PROFILE : off > > PULSEAUDIO : on > > RUST : on > > TEST : off > > However, I tried your set of options (with RUST on and off, since you > don't have it): things didn't change, still crashing. > > > The version is 45.0.1,1 > > 45.0.1_3,1, here, but I also went through 45.0.1,1, which crashed in the > same way. > > > May be you try pkg_libchk from sysutils/bsdadminscripts > > if the libraries are in order. > > I used sysutil/libchk, which should do more or less the same thing: > there were some unresolved references in binaries which should not be > related to FireFox: I solved that, but it's still crashing. > Any other thing to check? I do not know. > > > Do you have an i386 kernel? > > Yes. > > > I am not sure if there might be a possible issue. > > Any pointer on that? > *If* firefox is incompatible with i386 I might switch, but it's going to > be a very long work; so I'd like to get some hint about this before I > venture myself in such a trouble. With some luck somebody will do the tests on a different i386 machine. > > > When I have started using FreeBSD I thought amd64 is just for AMD processors. > > But amd64 is also ok for Intel. > > I know the difference. > However this box's install predates amd64: I was using it more than 10 > years ago (5.x or 6.x possibly) and it's still there through several > hardware and software upgrades. > Until now I haven't found any good reason to drop everything and > reinstall from scratch... Ok, you are much more experienced than me. I hope that at least the tests have given some information. > > > This is likely the newest one. I am not completely up to date because > > I mostly upgrade only when there are vulnerabilities. > > So do I, but I've gone through every minor update since I'm experiencing > these crashes. Good luck, I hope you will find the root cause. > > bye & Thanks > av. Kind regards, Christoph From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Mar 29 19:45:29 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E314AE2093 for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2016 19:45:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from petros.fraser@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yw0-x242.google.com (mail-yw0-x242.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::242]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 018901A3C for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2016 19:45:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from petros.fraser@gmail.com) Received: by mail-yw0-x242.google.com with SMTP id u8so4011196ywa.2 for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2016 12:45:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=Kwj6KXgyxGPzFE+nGl0YWCRVIOaBkTJDiSXwvtU7KYg=; b=f/yr6r6I6kMNEoh15HIRME8FTDKLwkgANKrRJG6fLLrFT50byla9SN9OBqh3ItYjRZ alQgEXyXYqNXrjSziD7ZyyNFNHdgKayRzp4CFqxOK8UiCtgJeIYBl4laA86WZoby0ux3 /DnV9FXxAmsmI5/Sv95LdwHBxUAkhqZcCJOkUHJkZkHmuCcurGYWgSgUzw0W9SSChPWb ajgFMEqUJbK3RZiNU4GSZbk1x6B61Svs/V6Gglf9Hz7tXzg1uL7faHS95xyO7sZBR40x CqAhUmBCOLfisL4mpsWAD2JDzdISipyQ072A7CpTXOYUD9jHMHE3DCVM/yEbbRv4BdU5 r6rg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=Kwj6KXgyxGPzFE+nGl0YWCRVIOaBkTJDiSXwvtU7KYg=; b=dpe9LtKCyX0jiCHEfxO4vdd/SaFVVgkYna0i4A1nj/R2z6Mr+pQqSPxUqtutPjIctv EossMOAdbSAm0a38JNPjZtZq+Z7i9d1oBRl1NNgfb1cbOpl7aMNaHoDx0PvIL8XadjFN ueLNwV68Dj7danTQ0ZUe9LxdPEgWwg9zWNy4kSRoHmZEj3I8J4e0J8zsX+/JjIyjUMM2 jq9pI+yh/gJqHo1omaWuNZuWpXrFCk7p9qYNZgf2BP4RFHS91Li75EOnojI1PkdFKUv6 ot1z6TauSkPxL9jzRBCDXzE8JUHYG6Lod4dy1VCLJ0h8pBrGz6L6FV0/+6moe5g53ZsZ mGSg== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJLDDOOFeJJeJyZ47VeQvgx0IWtL9GbP4RMpGPOd2moBicnxF398qgY/Dezxi7W4AX8zFMJy26gAb3guTw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.129.55.66 with SMTP id e63mr2288932ywa.277.1459280727617; Tue, 29 Mar 2016 12:45:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.13.225.133 with HTTP; Tue, 29 Mar 2016 12:45:27 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 14:45:27 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Issue with Bind-9.10 From: Peter Fraser To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.21 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 19:45:29 -0000 Hi All I upgraded from Bind 9.9x to bind910-9.10.3P4 on FreeBSD-9.3-RELEASE-p33. During the installation from ports, I checked RRL(Response Rate Limiting) After the installation I checked and resolves are still working. I restarted the service and no errors. My problem now is that when I use the option rate-limit { responses-per-second 10; }; and reload bind I get the error, unknown option rate-limit. Has anyone ever seen this error? I ran named -V as was suggested to me on another mailing list and surprisingly, got this result below. It is still showing Bind-9.9.5 although pkg info shows bind910-9.10.3P4 BIND 9.9.5 (Extended Support Version) built by make with '--prefix=/usr' '--infodir=/usr/share/info' '--mandir=/usr/share/man' '--enable-threads' '--enable-getifaddrs' '--disable-linux-caps' '--with-openssl=/usr' '--with-randomdev=/dev/random' '--without-idn' '--without-libxml2' Regards From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Mar 29 19:54:47 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19603AE2332 for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2016 19:54:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from papowell@astart.com) Received: from astart2.astart.com (wsip-72-214-30-30.sd.sd.cox.net [72.214.30.30]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 04CE7109A for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2016 19:54:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from papowell@astart.com) Received: from laptop_93.private (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by astart2.astart.com (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id u2TJne7M072373 for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2016 12:49:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from papowell@astart.com) Reply-To: papowell@astart.com Subject: Re: HTML5 videos crashes Firefox References: <56F804E9.8050506@netfence.it> <56FAAB3D.10906@netfence.it> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: Patrick Powell Organization: Astart Technologies Message-ID: <56FADC54.10907@astart.com> Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 12:49:40 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <56FAAB3D.10906@netfence.it> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 19:54:47 -0000 I just tried one of the videos and my firefox crashed as well. FreeBSD laptop_93.private 9.3-RELEASE-p30 FreeBSD 9.3-RELEASE-p30 #0: Mon Nov 2 10:11:50 UTC 2015 root@amd64-builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src /sys/GENERIC amd64 X firefox-43.0.3_1,1 Web browser based on the browser portion of Mozilla On 03/29/16 09:20, Andrea Venturoli wrote: > On Sun, 27 Mar 2016 10:12:07 -0700, Christoph Brinkhaus wrote: > >> Hello Andrea, > > Hello and thanks for your help. > > >> I have tried the first video I get from youtube without problems. >> May be you post an url where the crash occurs. > > I can just go to youtube.it/com and choose a random one; e.g.: > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hrJLzq_coUg > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LbVEXCh63pQ > > (Please forgive me for linking that crap, but you asked it :) > > > >> The options I use are >> according to pkg info >> ALSA : on >> BUNDLED_CAIRO : off >> CANBERRA : off >> DBUS : on >> DEBUG : off >> DTRACE : off >> FFMPEG : on >> GCONF : off >> GIO : on >> GNOMEUI : off >> GTK2 : on >> GTK3 : off >> INTEGER_SAMPLES: off >> LIBPROXY : off >> OPTIMIZED_CFLAGS: off >> PGO : off >> PROFILE : off >> PULSEAUDIO : off >> TEST : off > > I had: >> ALSA : off >> BUNDLED_CAIRO : on >> CANBERRA : off >> DBUS : on >> DEBUG : off >> DTRACE : on >> FFMPEG : on >> GCONF : off >> GIO : on >> GNOMEUI : off >> GTK2 : off >> GTK3 : on >> INTEGER_SAMPLES: off >> LIBPROXY : off >> OPTIMIZED_CFLAGS: on >> PGO : off >> PROFILE : off >> PULSEAUDIO : on >> RUST : on >> TEST : off > > However, I tried your set of options (with RUST on and off, since you > don't have it): things didn't change, still crashing. > > > > > The version is 45.0.1,1 > > 45.0.1_3,1, here, but I also went through 45.0.1,1, which crashed in > the same way. > > > >> May be you try pkg_libchk from sysutils/bsdadminscripts >> if the libraries are in order. > > I used sysutil/libchk, which should do more or less the same thing: > there were some unresolved references in binaries which should not be > related to FireFox: I solved that, but it's still crashing. > Any other thing to check? > > > >> Do you have an i386 kernel? > > Yes. > > > >> I am not sure if there might be a possible issue. > > Any pointer on that? > *If* firefox is incompatible with i386 I might switch, but it's going > to be a very long work; so I'd like to get some hint about this before > I venture myself in such a trouble. > > > >> When I have started using FreeBSD I thought amd64 is just for AMD >> processors. >> But amd64 is also ok for Intel. > > I know the difference. > However this box's install predates amd64: I was using it more than 10 > years ago (5.x or 6.x possibly) and it's still there through several > hardware and software upgrades. > Until now I haven't found any good reason to drop everything and > reinstall from scratch... > > > > > This is likely the newest one. I am not completely up to date because > > I mostly upgrade only when there are vulnerabilities. > > So do I, but I've gone through every minor update since I'm > experiencing these crashes. > > > bye & Thanks > av. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- Patrick Powell Astart Technologies papowell@astart.com 1530 Jamacha Rd, Suite X Network and System San Diego, CA 92019 Consulting 858-874-6543 FAX 858-751-2435 Web: www.astart.com From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Mar 29 20:45:31 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91D7EAE2726 for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2016 20:45:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from truckman@FreeBSD.org) Received: from gw.catspoiler.org (unknown [IPv6:2602:304:b010:ef20::f2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "gw.catspoiler.org", Issuer "gw.catspoiler.org" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 72A171890 for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2016 20:45:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from truckman@FreeBSD.org) Received: from FreeBSD.org (mousie.catspoiler.org [192.168.101.2]) by gw.catspoiler.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u2TKjMsL090850; Tue, 29 Mar 2016 13:45:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from truckman@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201603292045.u2TKjMsL090850@gw.catspoiler.org> Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 13:45:22 -0700 (PDT) From: Don Lewis Subject: Re: Issue with Bind-9.10 To: petros.fraser@gmail.com cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 20:45:31 -0000 On 29 Mar, Peter Fraser wrote: > Hi All > I upgraded from Bind 9.9x to bind910-9.10.3P4 on FreeBSD-9.3-RELEASE-p33. > During the installation from ports, I checked RRL(Response Rate Limiting) > After the installation I checked and resolves are still working. I > restarted the service and no errors. My problem now is that when I use the > option rate-limit { responses-per-second 10; }; and reload bind I get the > error, unknown option rate-limit. Has anyone ever seen this error? > > I ran named -V as was suggested to me on another mailing list and > surprisingly, got this result below. It is still showing Bind-9.9.5 > although pkg info shows bind910-9.10.3P4 > BIND 9.9.5 (Extended Support Version) built by make with > '--prefix=/usr' '--infodir=/usr/share/info' '--mandir=/usr/share/man' > '--enable-threads' '--enable-getifaddrs' '--disable-linux-caps' > '--with-openssl=/usr' '--with-randomdev=/dev/random' '--without-idn' > '--without-libxml2' Since you are running FreeBSD 9.3, which also has a copy of BIND in the base system, I suspect that the base version of named is getting executed instead of the ports version installed under /usr/local. When you installed the port, you should have seen the pkg-message, which says: * You will need to make sure that you have the following line * * in your /etc/rc.conf in order to have the startup script * * run the named version from the port: * * * * named_program="/usr/local/sbin/named" * From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Mar 30 03:38:21 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFC34AE26BE for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 03:38:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dewaynegeraghty@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lf0-x230.google.com (mail-lf0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6AB921B61; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 03:38:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dewaynegeraghty@gmail.com) Received: by mail-lf0-x230.google.com with SMTP id k79so26358230lfb.2; Tue, 29 Mar 2016 20:38:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=GSokwIZt0jtE56hasF83nHks2KRQgCW/lTcR1hK2j08=; b=y2I7E9H/pqKi6JI6Ca6mq7p+zYXhAoewm+zOlizF2wNJRhvwpUCtfIokn+pIT//z7C WLj5ExACzrvyRAM+mL72qiQ2YuUghJ+yCz1oyGJKAjjsgerCSuygDUxKxZdF2j1NjszT DJJ6Ocfcj0EF4ckQSsSxC9JMTDnyRTjD7nFXScFUlgGP4vOD+r3WWDHaVwNWHPkOCLOx GBPQxLoE3pAGHcp4W88lqbW5S4MoVbsevd/tFKoLxsmj88MraCa2WwbIPdNIZ0O420nD dgQl0qEwtTgUm/AAGlWhd3uNgDJOslxa5bep4/YVRdFBR4KM0CClsib1EwCAdUEGnc2y ht2Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=GSokwIZt0jtE56hasF83nHks2KRQgCW/lTcR1hK2j08=; b=Z0vnjP5G6U+7p0YiipDYzkQxsKNc5YQCD5Vh48ESg2hEvkzra2XyL4gPAmdG+fGm0b Mh7Ii2U5eziOf/YnrDoFzSQcYzDT9B6NJN2kyWMgZFHzOynXn4621GaiSlAPJ/ZzMLcl 1fCI1SYnYJ2YdY4q3/5UnhzGwSc7NtnaYPN5y7T8JbppP5tWnTnA2fwSW0sRAHu5EZwx lTFmnBKuVXpW3R3RY5rar5EsKxNeN3jKP4M/6re3fo5HEYt7ntbDlVm6bSpP7JHr2qog WjzWyzKxOFCr8Ha0SSbt0MLLUysuIzknVMmrOqqEY98puXDQ5E9e1jEiCp+dKFaVDBOp 9ZpA== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJLTR8axPsxrcF5y5Z2QPlmqrgl0wJNavAaW3Z1rg1Jq42gBBT/Sg4xQVemnGnfwFTVOSGDUFVnVpzJlsw== X-Received: by 10.25.152.135 with SMTP id a129mr2782189lfe.40.1459309097911; Tue, 29 Mar 2016 20:38:17 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.25.142.83 with HTTP; Tue, 29 Mar 2016 20:37:48 -0700 (PDT) From: Dewayne Geraghty Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 14:37:48 +1100 Message-ID: Subject: Library creep and additional dependencies for net/ntp? To: ports-list freebsd Cc: cy@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.21 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 03:38:22 -0000 Overnight I updated /usr/ports via svnlite, rebuilt all ports and noticed additional libraries and dependencies for net/ntp On 12th Feb, I'd built ntp-4.2.8p6.txz. Checking the libraries, I had # ldd /usr/local/sbin/ntpd /usr/local/sbin/ntpd: libmd.so.6 => /lib/libmd.so.6 (0x280fb000) libm.so.5 => /lib/libm.so.5 (0x2810f000) libcrypto.so.8 => /usr/local/lib/libcrypto.so.8 (0x28139000) libintl.so.8 => /usr/local/lib/libintl.so.8 (0x282ca000) libthr.so.3 => /lib/libthr.so.3 (0x282d3000) libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x282f4000) Today, I rebuilt ntp and found # ldd /usr/local/sbin/ntpd /usr/local/sbin/ntpd: * libmd5.so.0 => /usr/local/lib/libmd5.so.0 (0x280fc000) - from libwww* libm.so.5 => /lib/libm.so.5 (0x280fe000) libcrypto.so.8 => /usr/local/lib/libcrypto.so.8 (0x28128000) * libdns_sd.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libdns_sd.so.1 (0x282b9000) - mDNSResponder* libintl.so.8 => /usr/local/lib/libintl.so.8 (0x282c1000) libthr.so.3 => /lib/libthr.so.3 (0x282ca000) libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x282eb000) * libz.so.6 => /lib/libz.so.6 (0x2845e000) libssl.so.8 => /usr/local/lib/libssl.so.8 (0x28473000)* Checking pkg info -d ntpd # pkg info -d ntp ntp-4.2.8p6: openssl-1.0.2_8 libevent2-2.0.22_1 gettext-runtime-0.19.6 libedit-3.1.20150325_1 Can anyone shed any light on why ntp has picked up these additional libraries and created additional dependencies on libwww and mDNSresponder? I'm also curious as to how *libz *and *libssl *are now required, between ntp4.2.8p6 built in February vs the March build? By way of comparison, /usr/sbin/ntpd: (base OS ntp also ntp4.2.8p6) libm.so.5 => /lib/libm.so.5 (0x8008d2000) libthr.so.3 => /lib/libthr.so.3 (0x800afa000) libcrypto.so.7 => /lib/libcrypto.so.7 (0x800d1f000) libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x801115000) These results are on "FreeBSD 10.3-PRERELEASE #0 r296427M:" My options for ntp have remained unchanged since 20140914. Regards, Dewayne From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Mar 30 06:09:42 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4631AE2635 for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 06:09:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cy.schubert@komquats.com) Received: from smtp-out-no.shaw.ca (smtp-out-no.shaw.ca [64.59.134.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "Client", Issuer "CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 710E515F7; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 06:09:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cy.schubert@komquats.com) Received: from spqr.komquats.com ([96.50.22.10]) by shaw.ca with SMTP id l9JxaKFctQeyml9JyaAHKu; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 00:09:40 -0600 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.2 cv=H9KZ+KQi c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=jvE2nwUzI0ECrNeyr98KWA==:117 a=jvE2nwUzI0ECrNeyr98KWA==:17 a=L9H7d07YOLsA:10 a=9cW_t1CCXrUA:10 a=s5jvgZ67dGcA:10 a=7OsogOcEt9IA:10 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=BWvPGDcYAAAA:8 a=YxBL1-UpAAAA:8 a=-gFp_bQcj5nrH-6xNSUA:9 Received: from slippy.cwsent.com (slippy [10.1.1.91]) by spqr.komquats.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FA4A13751; Tue, 29 Mar 2016 23:09:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from slippy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by slippy.cwsent.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u2U69b4k062050; Tue, 29 Mar 2016 23:09:37 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Cy.Schubert@komquats.com) Message-Id: <201603300609.u2U69b4k062050@slippy.cwsent.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.8.0 04/21/2012 with nmh-1.6 Reply-to: Cy Schubert From: Cy Schubert X-os: FreeBSD X-Sender: cy@cwsent.com X-URL: http://www.komquats.com/ To: Dewayne Geraghty cc: ports-list freebsd , cy@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Library creep and additional dependencies for net/ntp? In-Reply-To: Message from Dewayne Geraghty of "Wed, 30 Mar 2016 14:37:48 +1100." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 23:09:37 -0700 X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfHJN6gXJgHzCerbYfrOzbP1DP3UYwofqJSjuxjix6otXj160bc468GiE8jND8bSHk5v7E1+6VHkCBW9jQ6uMIrlvrFS3bDQEWiN+QW1oA/ckwCVnLmBa p/fB4UbuuzoFFknUINBS1P/vMV8v87W1ZkCDrwxjdGa9ymsaShR7xqK9xAOAtEu0ILvf1d2XZiQP/rD39MAJY6rCmZHeRtKkE2tGtC1wZcG57jcCzLWZhVTk Kc/ZJ0BmA5H7zGg7Jvx64g== X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 06:09:42 -0000 In message , Dewayne Geraghty writes: > --001a114035e2660c5e052f3be038 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > > Overnight I updated /usr/ports via svnlite, rebuilt all ports and noticed > additional libraries and dependencies for net/ntp > > On 12th Feb, I'd built ntp-4.2.8p6.txz. Checking the libraries, I had > # ldd /usr/local/sbin/ntpd > /usr/local/sbin/ntpd: > libmd.so.6 => /lib/libmd.so.6 (0x280fb000) > libm.so.5 => /lib/libm.so.5 (0x2810f000) > libcrypto.so.8 => /usr/local/lib/libcrypto.so.8 (0x28139000) > libintl.so.8 => /usr/local/lib/libintl.so.8 (0x282ca000) > libthr.so.3 => /lib/libthr.so.3 (0x282d3000) > libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x282f4000) > > Today, I rebuilt ntp and found > # ldd /usr/local/sbin/ntpd > /usr/local/sbin/ntpd: > * libmd5.so.0 => /usr/local/lib/libmd5.so.0 (0x280fc000) - from > libwww* > libm.so.5 => /lib/libm.so.5 (0x280fe000) > libcrypto.so.8 => /usr/local/lib/libcrypto.so.8 (0x28128000) > * libdns_sd.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libdns_sd.so.1 (0x282b9000) - > mDNSResponder* > libintl.so.8 => /usr/local/lib/libintl.so.8 (0x282c1000) > libthr.so.3 => /lib/libthr.so.3 (0x282ca000) > libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x282eb000) > > * libz.so.6 => /lib/libz.so.6 (0x2845e000) libssl.so.8 => > /usr/local/lib/libssl.so.8 (0x28473000)* > > Checking pkg info -d ntpd > # pkg info -d ntp > ntp-4.2.8p6: > openssl-1.0.2_8 > libevent2-2.0.22_1 > gettext-runtime-0.19.6 > libedit-3.1.20150325_1 > > Can anyone shed any light on why ntp has picked up these additional > libraries and created additional dependencies on libwww and mDNSresponder? > > I'm also curious as to how *libz *and *libssl *are now required, between > ntp4.2.8p6 built in February vs the March build? > > By way of comparison, > /usr/sbin/ntpd: (base OS ntp also ntp4.2.8p6) > libm.so.5 => /lib/libm.so.5 (0x8008d2000) > libthr.so.3 => /lib/libthr.so.3 (0x800afa000) > libcrypto.so.7 => /lib/libcrypto.so.7 (0x800d1f000) > libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x801115000) > > These results are on "FreeBSD 10.3-PRERELEASE #0 r296427M:" My options for > ntp have remained unchanged since 20140914. Actually nothing has changed. However the net/ntp ./configure script detects if additional libraries are already on your system, e.g. libmd5, libdns_sd, and uses them. For instance, my laptop has huge collection of packages installed to support various GUI environments under X: slippy$ ldd /usr/local/sbin/ntpd /usr/local/sbin/ntpd: libmd5.so.0 => /usr/local/lib/libmd5.so.0 (0x2c4c6000) libm.so.5 => /lib/libm.so.5 (0x2c6c8000) libcrypto.so.8 => /usr/local/lib/libcrypto.so.8 (0x2ca00000) libdns_sd.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libdns_sd.so.1 (0x2ce5e000) libintl.so.8 => /usr/local/lib/libintl.so.8 (0x2d066000) libthr.so.3 => /lib/libthr.so.3 (0x2d271000) libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x2d496000) libz.so.6 => /lib/libz.so.6 (0x2d843000) libssl.so.7 => /usr/lib/libssl.so.7 (0x2da59000) libcrypto.so.7 => /lib/libcrypto.so.7 (0x2dcc5000) slippy$ My firewall OTOH bare bones, has very few packages and no X installed: cwfw# ldd /usr/local/sbin/ntpd /usr/local/sbin/ntpd: libmd.so.6 => /lib/libmd.so.6 (0x8008ba000) libm.so.5 => /lib/libm.so.5 (0x800aca000) libcrypto.so.8 => /usr/local/lib/libcrypto.so.8 (0x800e00000) libintl.so.8 => /usr/local/lib/libintl.so.8 (0x801253000) libthr.so.3 => /lib/libthr.so.3 (0x80145e000) libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x801683000) cwfw# In my poudriere build repo, the cached package (it's still building), ntpd references: cwsys$ ldd /tmp/usr/local/sbin/ntpd /tmp/usr/local/sbin/ntpd: libmd.so.6 => /lib/libmd.so.6 (0x2c4c4000) libm.so.5 => /lib/libm.so.5 (0x2c6d4000) libcrypto.so.7 => /lib/libcrypto.so.7 (0x2c8fd000) libthr.so.3 => /lib/libthr.so.3 (0x2ccf3000) libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x2cf18000) cwsys$ The ntp tarball does this out of the box -- read ./configure. The more libraries the ntp build finds, the more it uses. Don't worry about it dragging in gratuitous packages. It won't. But, it does use whatever it detects. If you want a minimal build, use poudriere to build your own binary packages or use FreeBSD.org built binary packages. (If you're wondering, ntpd on my laptop looks as it does because I did a point upgrade of net/ntp outside of poudriere built packages.) Generally, it's recommended people use binary packages. To summarize, use binary packages. If you want to roll your own, use poudriere, the install your own binary packages. Otherwise ports/net/ntp will dynamically discover libraries during ./configure it can use. Hope this helps. -- Cheers, Cy Schubert or FreeBSD UNIX: Web: http://www.FreeBSD.org The need of the many outweighs the greed of the few. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Mar 30 07:23:38 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9814BAE2899 for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 07:23:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dewaynegeraghty@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lb0-x243.google.com (mail-lb0-x243.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::243]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 09E7A1C3C for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 07:23:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dewaynegeraghty@gmail.com) Received: by mail-lb0-x243.google.com with SMTP id vk4so3299967lbb.1 for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 00:23:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=bXGznn1XhnYxdEYYAgDmcnx5b08+kZEYIxfBs2JNjLM=; b=jhtGX3siRK6FqNCJS+HijyIeXQc7kKvRnpgvaxNYQVd6EkEEx1Q6D8O+fuj6Sd9Yrv O5rn9Nr1Bk7FvoWK3kuNwg4zsaw5yy54mKDu7AvZWZXnFPl3HinEryigsjVvNauFL3fu CplKT8T+rs81Cs1288yjRp2pjdvkkaQzaptyqh8g5gYNLDi8kY1qRnmIozHcLr5nNc27 BS8AbgDgIrp8JwIb8gOz3XKlGw1iJopS6ZNXHT8T8NA1ngbJ8j+vEWe4PFs4F+0Ib9MY Tzxua9foL4CsrHjdzSrKAW1AJFjsV9Q/7Wo1zC2QnCY6KSPJPZCvjXUIxMZTAy5eOqKy qagw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=bXGznn1XhnYxdEYYAgDmcnx5b08+kZEYIxfBs2JNjLM=; b=EnhxVbCKY+QzxLdZB74UP2VUz4AHsitM+F0vVHnAEy1Q5qmrG7jk1v9Is4VaBEAyJT KxPtnMxnEwNWKCrfa91kA7sKcxfXGkFiX2jF5UKl0OVufSfqqTcb88/FNzO4/HSO71hD xpM5R4F+mjVh7Mg+stC3W/VGAPH9loLeRFjTi+eCoa43lbspfL/I2X1sVLPbzE+kO3WI 3PoAmALes0Z/EjWAtI4gwyUsIZSCOULLtfTuIINZq/sIz8+Ymps+6h2zCMhRZeVB07Gq Pd8/ulxaUv0N9r1dYV+rfy+NPazPpsx0tnBjC9pa4P/a801QL7r27puqizEV/tdgjowB iCkg== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJLGiH5UWuJNwmNCR5lbh/B1H6+8KNn375AaPcIdFbL08bz7isTarWkM92o7ZT79Ej5ZRuRuhlETJVo5Yg== X-Received: by 10.112.198.166 with SMTP id jd6mr3000805lbc.12.1459322615110; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 00:23:35 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.25.142.83 with HTTP; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 00:23:05 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <201603300609.u2U69b4k062050@slippy.cwsent.com> References: <201603300609.u2U69b4k062050@slippy.cwsent.com> From: Dewayne Geraghty Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 18:23:05 +1100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Library creep and additional dependencies for net/ntp? To: Cy Schubert Cc: ports-list freebsd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.21 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 07:23:38 -0000 On 30 March 2016 at 17:09, Cy Schubert wrote: > In message > om> > , Dewayne Geraghty writes: > > --001a114035e2660c5e052f3be038 > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > > > > Overnight I updated /usr/ports via svnlite, rebuilt all ports and noticed > > additional libraries and dependencies for net/ntp > > > > On 12th Feb, I'd built ntp-4.2.8p6.txz. Checking the libraries, I had > > # ldd /usr/local/sbin/ntpd > > /usr/local/sbin/ntpd: > > libmd.so.6 => /lib/libmd.so.6 (0x280fb000) > > libm.so.5 => /lib/libm.so.5 (0x2810f000) > > libcrypto.so.8 => /usr/local/lib/libcrypto.so.8 (0x28139000) > > libintl.so.8 => /usr/local/lib/libintl.so.8 (0x282ca000) > > libthr.so.3 => /lib/libthr.so.3 (0x282d3000) > > libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x282f4000) > > > > Today, I rebuilt ntp and found > > # ldd /usr/local/sbin/ntpd > > /usr/local/sbin/ntpd: > > * libmd5.so.0 => /usr/local/lib/libmd5.so.0 (0x280fc000) - from > > libwww* > > libm.so.5 => /lib/libm.so.5 (0x280fe000) > > libcrypto.so.8 => /usr/local/lib/libcrypto.so.8 (0x28128000) > > * libdns_sd.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libdns_sd.so.1 (0x282b9000) - > > mDNSResponder* > > libintl.so.8 => /usr/local/lib/libintl.so.8 (0x282c1000) > > libthr.so.3 => /lib/libthr.so.3 (0x282ca000) > > libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x282eb000) > > > > * libz.so.6 => /lib/libz.so.6 (0x2845e000) libssl.so.8 => > > /usr/local/lib/libssl.so.8 (0x28473000)* > > > > Checking pkg info -d ntpd > > # pkg info -d ntp > > ntp-4.2.8p6: > > openssl-1.0.2_8 > > libevent2-2.0.22_1 > > gettext-runtime-0.19.6 > > libedit-3.1.20150325_1 > > > > Can anyone shed any light on why ntp has picked up these additional > > libraries and created additional dependencies on libwww and > mDNSresponder? > > > > I'm also curious as to how *libz *and *libssl *are now required, between > > ntp4.2.8p6 built in February vs the March build? > > > > By way of comparison, > > /usr/sbin/ntpd: (base OS ntp also ntp4.2.8p6) > > libm.so.5 => /lib/libm.so.5 (0x8008d2000) > > libthr.so.3 => /lib/libthr.so.3 (0x800afa000) > > libcrypto.so.7 => /lib/libcrypto.so.7 (0x800d1f000) > > libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x801115000) > > > > These results are on "FreeBSD 10.3-PRERELEASE #0 r296427M:" My options > for > > ntp have remained unchanged since 20140914. > > Actually nothing has changed. However the net/ntp ./configure script > detects if additional libraries are already on your system, e.g. libmd5, > libdns_sd, and uses them. For instance, my laptop has huge collection of > packages installed to support various GUI environments under X: > > slippy$ ldd /usr/local/sbin/ntpd > /usr/local/sbin/ntpd: > libmd5.so.0 => /usr/local/lib/libmd5.so.0 (0x2c4c6000) > libm.so.5 => /lib/libm.so.5 (0x2c6c8000) > libcrypto.so.8 => /usr/local/lib/libcrypto.so.8 (0x2ca00000) > libdns_sd.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libdns_sd.so.1 (0x2ce5e000) > libintl.so.8 => /usr/local/lib/libintl.so.8 (0x2d066000) > libthr.so.3 => /lib/libthr.so.3 (0x2d271000) > libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x2d496000) > libz.so.6 => /lib/libz.so.6 (0x2d843000) > libssl.so.7 => /usr/lib/libssl.so.7 (0x2da59000) > libcrypto.so.7 => /lib/libcrypto.so.7 (0x2dcc5000) > slippy$ > > My firewall OTOH bare bones, has very few packages and no X installed: > > cwfw# ldd /usr/local/sbin/ntpd > /usr/local/sbin/ntpd: > libmd.so.6 => /lib/libmd.so.6 (0x8008ba000) > libm.so.5 => /lib/libm.so.5 (0x800aca000) > libcrypto.so.8 => /usr/local/lib/libcrypto.so.8 (0x800e00000) > libintl.so.8 => /usr/local/lib/libintl.so.8 (0x801253000) > libthr.so.3 => /lib/libthr.so.3 (0x80145e000) > libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x801683000) > cwfw# > > In my poudriere build repo, the cached package (it's still building), ntpd > references: > > cwsys$ ldd /tmp/usr/local/sbin/ntpd > /tmp/usr/local/sbin/ntpd: > libmd.so.6 => /lib/libmd.so.6 (0x2c4c4000) > libm.so.5 => /lib/libm.so.5 (0x2c6d4000) > libcrypto.so.7 => /lib/libcrypto.so.7 (0x2c8fd000) > libthr.so.3 => /lib/libthr.so.3 (0x2ccf3000) > libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x2cf18000) > cwsys$ > > The ntp tarball does this out of the box -- read ./configure. The more > libraries the ntp build finds, the more it uses. Don't worry about it > dragging in gratuitous packages. It won't. But, it does use whatever it > detects. > > If you want a minimal build, use poudriere to build your own binary > packages or use FreeBSD.org built binary packages. (If you're wondering, > ntpd on my laptop looks as it does because I did a point upgrade of net/ntp > outside of poudriere built packages.) Generally, it's recommended people > use binary packages. > > To summarize, use binary packages. If you want to roll your own, use > poudriere, the install your own binary packages. Otherwise ports/net/ntp > will dynamically discover libraries during ./configure it can use. > > Hope this helps. > > > -- > Cheers, > Cy Schubert or > FreeBSD UNIX: Web: http://www.FreeBSD.org > > The need of the many outweighs the greed of the few. > > > Thanks Cy, I appreciate your calming my concern that something nefarious was occurring under /usr/ports/Mk. :) I'm very disappointed to see that "configure" is undertaking the decision making to include libraries that, on the face of it, are unnecessary and unwanted, as in this case. We've customised some 230+ of the ports and build a set of packages for different server or boundary device configurations. So I'm going to have to investigate how I can address the scenario where the build environment should be regarded as polluted with remnants from other package builds. (We start from a virgin system and build 800+ packages using portmaster) I appreciate you pointing me toward pouderie. For many reasons we've kept the build environment very simple, in the hope of reproducibility and have been building within multiple jails for many years. (Long before pouderie). Perhaps its worth another look, but I'll need to ascertain why configure is bringing in libs that aren't required; but more importantly we have package dependencies that the pkg system has no information about. I have a clue regarding mDSNresponder which I'm pursuing, but no idea as to how libwww was included. Either way it makes maintaining remote systems from packages that now have *unknown dependencies* (ie "pkg info -d ntp", doesn't list them) somewhat problematic. Again thank-you for your advise and the effort that you've put in over the years maintaining ntp. Kind regards, Dewayne From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Mar 30 07:36:36 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0761AE2CD6 for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 07:36:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from baptiste.daroussin@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wm0-x244.google.com (mail-wm0-x244.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::244]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 453D21675; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 07:36:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from baptiste.daroussin@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wm0-x244.google.com with SMTP id 20so12032046wmh.3; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 00:36:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=2JSmJTKunkywmnOcpgi0OUwBAenqdqGbVrCzaAb4E30=; b=w6GnRNy759e8OtM3bawxNJsIPJggTq/VUzYIi1a4qaMa958J55pv9iMAOxscvztvLn hTzl6H5q9kZnexTzLJXEHtXP/uzcVlSw6ogj/FJyhrhJnbejcADFYMul8J7d0N4lTud1 8d+NUUH1eEer8fiwXcH/yx1Wz6SAdd9VtBboU+45VnmoUEZF6wpVKTJgUfj7WGSMDk/L /QUh5IpWiQPuHEODe5figrlvVME+FairSy/SY3J0h3l3fTR3FUbglMJVI/U+hL7/HLU4 EZS83xI6vhJooBuJlgpsD8tyaNLJQdStOUTYwKJGnC7ofHtjNZIqsfbWzqywzWtlXRcP nI+w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=2JSmJTKunkywmnOcpgi0OUwBAenqdqGbVrCzaAb4E30=; b=SClui1USAEB28nL8exjuKsBabD4OOCe0CV5oMzR57aGJcy3KLZ7IPBRumIqXTLHmjX hniUnqSUvaUVFToA6049ErviEWWTknOMIQZxfW9JWfJx+lqM8pUVToPRQOk9Qq/01Bs4 Y+rSJYsSPcNaqkc3J8SDtrIgOTzj1k1SIwC70Y1QKcd3UzJDAtE2nC0umLToGtaO798O 3cROkLDXiBCCUR/wgXmxvMyp9FHrF9wmpyH1XlUARp9aQwkxxslrD6Ml876CU9CwlrQx C+mlH2eUMF8GALqH68Ohc7Jv3nF/nt5s8cKpxpFV3CmOhLXeKx3p8n5vASLv0GDpxAe1 SYnA== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJLWlD+WRcczsJOMsAknC4aHkTezvFTA6XPQ2IHQgaOcxZCfvTnoRet4Cr84Evv9Eg== X-Received: by 10.194.7.201 with SMTP id l9mr7561925wja.16.1459323394715; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 00:36:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ivaldir.etoilebsd.net ([2001:41d0:8:db4c::1]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u16sm2983539wmd.5.2016.03.30.00.36.33 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 30 Mar 2016 00:36:33 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Baptiste Daroussin Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 09:36:31 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: Cy Schubert Cc: Dewayne Geraghty , ports-list freebsd , cy@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Library creep and additional dependencies for net/ntp? Message-ID: <20160330073631.GD1128@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> References: <201603300609.u2U69b4k062050@slippy.cwsent.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="8nsIa27JVQLqB7/C" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201603300609.u2U69b4k062050@slippy.cwsent.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 07:36:36 -0000 --8nsIa27JVQLqB7/C Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 11:09:37PM -0700, Cy Schubert wrote: >=20 > Actually nothing has changed. However the net/ntp ./configure script=20 > detects if additional libraries are already on your system, e.g. libmd5,= =20 > libdns_sd, and uses them. For instance, my laptop has huge collection of= =20 > packages installed to support various GUI environments under X: >=20 Actually we should try to prevent that as much as possible when we can. That said ntp configure script is not nice enough to give you a switch to enable/disable it. but adding: CONFIGURE_ENV=3D"ac_cv_header_dns_sd_h=3Dno" when you do not want to build = with libdns_sd should do the trick. I have not tested, just guessed from reading configure.ac Bapt --8nsIa27JVQLqB7/C Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJW+4H/AAoJEGOJi9zxtz5a/zgP/jppTsNlMousO7thPgvEqOC4 rQPbVNqjjdQ51K0gNIYvPO2MD2DAHmbeIyb9iE7nLh5O0B9MJMgkUSZm0tLhwWsn b5zwJa7GNqVLpNfHyq+sVXk1OepGDtFI/dP+QIzoXFV+6Vpb+bHmMweLTwPVvEMT vDavt+cn5nLYG2JogcAgD47vvKX7w+/2e/JiyQWSDTSyY+b6h02FFz/JKT9D6qOd Jpd9fATVI1aDilnyq9usyI2oWWKeL/l9QxoAfkde33bhtNmyW0QS+DRfHAEtKnpv ZpuapRneURrT3fwYls7hr8uYKN63/M0tujAAOLmggXjogbXdoipOCIVJq4/DVkIe Su4ttDUkKWxH8/gIiZOu1GwYnANiw7DWMSWdJtVIwRcOVmsjbkK2GoNfF4Nk8cvS kXxnmDC/r9+OibxZQ/3UnIKRg9WfCrDRZ7tOBMDBy/mZ04xyQe1QbI1OmOUI8ptH ECmvFZq0k5U1qQANFW2LFOfRSiUL/SK0e78M2r+rPNDUJinLZTMTTMFVkYthupE1 RVI5VZf1MiFJCOS6prZXNJcoHgbmeTJUtAVCI0ogv8X02QwLe/7gR9dmZ9dK942b xdnFbE8mMJKygbcuJkjGf+3Ie55jDOGdOf5pIrdBAT9y+jIehRmbgTdZDO0khbYn YnGJCwZ1Gk8Bx/v8uHCz =Cim4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --8nsIa27JVQLqB7/C-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Mar 30 12:51:48 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45A66AE163F for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 12:51:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from timp87@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wm0-x22d.google.com (mail-wm0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D8C561052 for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 12:51:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from timp87@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wm0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id r72so98219414wmg.0 for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 05:51:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=0T+krT6Sx4rOOjRp1Hwc52xegICm3nx/R5WdN835KhM=; b=OvrHmHZzSL4WKsL5Dw9ejhrviDZNg1in3UO2pWs0aqsYmG4aYnmB6q5SeHsyi6K7// MomRsoYa5KlBVP9GPM5lldDFU8dcvPB+OyC2I+cRVW9Ar1pH5elnkBG9EWgg/2u+W4g6 spOJbmqXvsRkB+d3tAtcyo9I/MRJk3cpzMMn9L05Lz6pc2tKDKVjofzFDFaGEQQn9MY3 xikPeU3dZrwZxpzD9GaEZj64kkrj6BQxIZoIceZWfgtG3VFjm4Vv9bskMr4V34Yr/D4n fg9soccx+dddDtfwVd3+aYCPRHbNYHdpEdLcuCj1wE85AfrtPyt2TUJFmmp22ojPTJuL 67nA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=0T+krT6Sx4rOOjRp1Hwc52xegICm3nx/R5WdN835KhM=; b=c5ROMRTx54I1jCjmRKiS3JVPeGacGXwUu2dAYS3wtIzuz+SwWIiSbeG5OTXwjgmQ4E XbA6fU+27/XBvDn6cOzToSOtI02s5+JxBG8O7/gDqFOFMuPBPBiIGnFglh1KPS3qMEGJ /E4rh+2/OhHdYNAywiRdAUp/1mQ+C3aUXH8m0jR1sphD+tUUMJcX9GZbpVfRPUcjP1bV rsUXYgJHJkGyevGUC8EqhHe68s3L0DL9OVKLCiBfP0VnbbzlBIIthrmASKcXFasz98n7 gEpHFbiTtucokaxZFOPjM1Iwc1FKrHr3EQiGlzXG/ps9yxTgk1DSpGY6/mj0iJh1phv+ s3SQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJInlORsLfHzCIuhkZZsxDs9CD7QBBiucNviQOG7863+qIGYrzoJe8OGS3IllX4yzdKf6tAwFwjoVnG8aQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.28.176.133 with SMTP id z127mr24160485wme.66.1459342306377; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 05:51:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.28.49.7 with HTTP; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 05:51:46 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 15:51:46 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: www/squid changes From: Pavel Timofeev To: ports-list freebsd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 12:51:48 -0000 Hello! Can anybody take a look at https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208290? Thanks! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Mar 30 13:29:40 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C0FBAE3067 for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 13:29:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cy.schubert@komquats.com) Received: from smtp-out-no.shaw.ca (smtp-out-no.shaw.ca [64.59.134.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "Client", Issuer "CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E0331284; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 13:29:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cy.schubert@komquats.com) Received: from spqr.komquats.com ([96.50.22.10]) by shaw.ca with SMTP id lG9NaLEIPQeymlG9OaAnXr; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 07:27:10 -0600 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.2 cv=H9KZ+KQi c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=jvE2nwUzI0ECrNeyr98KWA==:117 a=jvE2nwUzI0ECrNeyr98KWA==:17 a=L9H7d07YOLsA:10 a=9cW_t1CCXrUA:10 a=s5jvgZ67dGcA:10 a=7OsogOcEt9IA:10 a=sol3VE4AAAAA:8 a=BWvPGDcYAAAA:8 a=YxBL1-UpAAAA:8 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=RUnYMtAdgAKv-wF8vxUA:9 Received: from slippy.cwsent.com (slippy [10.1.1.91]) by spqr.komquats.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 276A613751; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 06:27:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from slippy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by slippy.cwsent.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u2UDR7GE075111; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 06:27:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Cy.Schubert@komquats.com) Message-Id: <201603301327.u2UDR7GE075111@slippy.cwsent.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.8.0 04/21/2012 with nmh-1.6 Reply-to: Cy Schubert From: Cy Schubert X-os: FreeBSD X-Sender: cy@cwsent.com X-URL: http://www.komquats.com/ To: Baptiste Daroussin cc: Cy Schubert , Dewayne Geraghty , ports-list freebsd , cy@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Library creep and additional dependencies for net/ntp? In-Reply-To: Message from Baptiste Daroussin of "Wed, 30 Mar 2016 09:36:31 +0200." <20160330073631.GD1128@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 06:27:07 -0700 X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfHD34GQh0/LC69F1Ajadn3aLyYiBYRAyNjj134U4YCeXUARplNlWfcVMAaJzekr6wvMLmppTHdzt9G+2VL0/wSV97nWIPsA9HvkuojmlBonqupJcioFe YhbTKwSRJdc78xjEtdlpg+H8Rvu15B1zBL/f8Tkcix+dzqECqX4FBLni7qx9f+82hAFuqWXgROuoUB9Ms+Ep54ZuwhNLJqBqqlafwHVE7SaKej2Uu1A/yF83 zuar3X2gzTDjTV5ciP9TvjmZ9H8jWe+RkOlkRSAMCYY= X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 13:29:40 -0000 In message <20160330073631.GD1128@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net>, Baptiste Daroussin wr ites: > On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 11:09:37PM -0700, Cy Schubert wrote: > >=20 > > Actually nothing has changed. However the net/ntp ./configure script=20 > > detects if additional libraries are already on your system, e.g. libmd5,= > =20 > > libdns_sd, and uses them. For instance, my laptop has huge collection of= > =20 > > packages installed to support various GUI environments under X: > >=20 > Actually we should try to prevent that as much as possible when we can. That > said ntp configure script is not nice enough to give you a switch to > enable/disable it. > > but adding: > CONFIGURE_ENV=3D"ac_cv_header_dns_sd_h=3Dno" when you do not want to build = > with > libdns_sd should do the trick. > > I have not tested, just guessed from reading configure.ac That should work. If you want, you can do it or the next time I'm in there I will. As of now it's on my list of things to do. If you do it, remember to do both ntp ports. -- Cheers, Cy Schubert or FreeBSD UNIX: Web: http://www.FreeBSD.org The need of the many outweighs the greed of the few. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Mar 30 21:28:10 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01E1BAE3F61 for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 21:28:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from woodsb02@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wm0-x22f.google.com (mail-wm0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 926E6114C for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 21:28:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from woodsb02@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wm0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id 20so88297421wmh.1 for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 14:28:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=gVhVlMfhbvQEMNYZgEhDwXxS21csIQYoqO+xweOWF8o=; b=obzEcOz2XoqywRdT3XerWV/B9UlPp7hYepk915HGUI7p6KRcb4/sCKLkNLCW5OB1eV 6pkkiMTI479dP1SW9tLkPUrvZdIVYEVBg7mVctZwJYCbStJu7dDBSzoBKAcAA46N42qQ aWocuk2OWox6AAc3+YDo2bKyX5twwdSh22Nef7w/jwXzSxBMZD2XYcoIAJRawDpUkTav 9Xdn6W39fMn84OKG59zgmGfhZiCnbnH7RD9KgUR5DXEdmOW0Huhm9bRi+E7GWjeWADvP B3suABejVKEGq93YLANGddJVE8Mp8VIXOMwmRZDxgUgeIlZqKfHY/yKwr/5EdJldGsku 9lHA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=gVhVlMfhbvQEMNYZgEhDwXxS21csIQYoqO+xweOWF8o=; b=gqfXIXgFcyeuwYMhNpRQ7I5iv8NTgE4dgttZ925N0mp3agkevL02U45ZtsGTICKnkx xxZI+SPxukYEfTjNqyUWzo7cplwX48YMbOAsN4r0sH0UcLQtEeGOOV4ejY2/hm7ROI9y NNqcg7+f7PCOd3BDTk8iS8x135OCISqXHQNcNHZxDQ1x64QdXZwtlGXeTepWErWwMVaB GiLYnYP+UaSAwIRjj5AQ/ccAs6l2XJVwIPcKNJ2mr1PjW59NvuSfY1zvx8Q04/TflJgc LfiGLCFFJcLH0A7IN6KfuvaRMEpKHnaguv4DQIxaGcZFURS2PU+vGwte6i9g7OLJXvWP VMoA== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJLJaYYpyM3um9NNqZAkDwAZS7IYRxbxjJPMmFw7ThWphN5vzrv5QNl+coVEV0LLkLXUuIWLmbOL0YGOOQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.28.214.11 with SMTP id n11mr11883189wmg.31.1459373288225; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 14:28:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.194.23.104 with HTTP; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 14:28:08 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 23:28:08 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Multiple ffmpeg versions in ports From: Ben Woods To: FreeBSD ports Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.21 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 21:28:10 -0000 Hello ports people, What do you think about having numerous versions of ffmpeg in ports, similar to lang/python? There seems to be a common problem with ffmpeg being a fast moving project, with backward incompatible API/ABI changes between major versions. This results in regular difficulties building ports which depend on ffmpeg, and often ports bundle their own version of ffmpeg to avoid incorrect API difficulties across different operating systems / distros (e.g. HandBrake, plexhometheater). Bundled libraries should be avoided where possible to ensure we can provide clarity on where security vulnerabilities exist (of which there are a few for ffmpeg). [1] Whilst the ffmpeg team appear to be supporting 2.5.x, 2.6.x, 2.7.x, 2.8.x and 3.0.x, we probably only need to maintain a port where it is required for another port to build correctly. To start with I was thinking we should simply create multimedia/ffmpeg30, move multimedia/ffmpeg to multimedia/ffmpeg28, and create a dummy multimedia/ffmpeg which depends on multimedia/ffmpeg30. Any ports which fail to build against multimedia/ffmpeg30 can instead require multimedia/ffmpeg28, and we could add a comment next to the dependency reminding the port maintainer to move to the later version of ffmpeg once it is supported by the package. This would likely mean we will have a number of versions of ffmpeg in the ports system over time, but I think it is the reality that different packages support different versions of the ffmpeg API/ABI, and it would help keep track of what is vulnerable / outdated rather than hiding it by bundled ffmpeg versions. Thoughts? If the idea is supported, I could prepare a phabricator review of the proposed changes. [1] https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/porters-handbook/bundled-libs.html -- From: Benjamin Woods woodsb02@gmail.com From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Mar 30 21:39:24 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC9EEAE32C9 for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 21:39:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from woodsb02@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wm0-x233.google.com (mail-wm0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 67EBF1775 for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 21:39:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from woodsb02@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wm0-x233.google.com with SMTP id p65so89340925wmp.0 for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 14:39:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=Ju2zVXUt5H0W0N2Ac1tXp4QKZIJ9e8UV2oWEyDsEGUc=; b=B8ZNEG0j4A/pGsXo0eDuOWFl9Oz+fa5QchXZYm3kkNG9KKCaEqpAWQcEERj+LPc5Lu vgm0pxvBWZfFIQ+NNBwro5wp9q9eYJRk93j3NHQPJXGtIgHzVDqVDdVHdOoobrhcIkCi 0YeJC0BIDiCud1j9F5SvdrmkgNP382RQIHIIYAG+1MvdkDvfhTk9UoApJ6esQRNSan0U RQbaxrt+j25FN4I9wP50u/RXR0MdeotySYzLrHGpqx/UUrePZWHbEodkidzCYU+VyxKv mksnHUFwCHNahz7y/95BmMsZE8jURpyuFRUV4aSa3dSq4b7PIMluJz2RA8bWJaCIQBfc gSiQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to; bh=Ju2zVXUt5H0W0N2Ac1tXp4QKZIJ9e8UV2oWEyDsEGUc=; b=gO8fzGL7f873dbHOgvXUlnA2lrGaxLuPJbouNVXALGl6o3TEH48Ha8VaVY5sjC24JY R9Wsffsizw17/Vb8kteLOdDzmV8bYMO7uNpSyurHVr47Mu8Bl8s8U6HOj0EZYorBH5M4 APGEr9yOh41xEuQRzek2fl5BL23E7IAFafw7NvrYuYiDOHIIA88HW0pc9VtGAhNj+AXN Ul5/ns4W4iSHnl98cQ/PIHMwzUn+bVvfmqyHVo846RlCcpBe/t/qNo3kAroHpvaivCmE CSwmM7x6zyoBrpY4qgV4LgknLaBtvw13amqpo9bt3oTveeOcZv/f/1bDKbiMglVDp+3D T3kQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJIkV1/liysZ+Kl2QI+aVKMsZZFKK0Cw/xbJEI9JPUVdhw/UqgdroX70rXp69fWAsPsyZBmzaqHMzMz2wA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.28.97.10 with SMTP id v10mr26974094wmb.62.1459373962965; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 14:39:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.194.23.104 with HTTP; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 14:39:22 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 23:39:22 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Multiple ffmpeg versions in ports From: Ben Woods To: FreeBSD ports Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.21 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 21:39:24 -0000 On 30 March 2016 at 23:28, Ben Woods wrote: > > What do you think about having numerous versions of ffmpeg in ports, > similar to lang/python? > I guess the obvious question is how could it be possible for multiple ffmpeg versions to be installed at the same time? Is it possible to ensure the files do not overlap, and that each package is linking against the correct installed version? -- From: Benjamin Woods woodsb02@gmail.com From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Mar 30 23:59:08 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 189EDAE3592 for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 23:59:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ig0-x232.google.com (mail-ig0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D6F011CAC for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 23:59:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: by mail-ig0-x232.google.com with SMTP id cl4so114861252igb.0 for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 16:59:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc; bh=5C+bzIA+7KM9xkqGFG3EJbnj3feJ8TznhIvgkPyAQi4=; b=koNXyQbYpPFqTLtXNm6uf8hmxsi6YcPy5KsY98FRTun199VLrju+k0lRuEuYaoSiAN 2S+Mc1E4/oZ6q0AtQnocBeAD7RTYfn/p4XaOitMOdw/sAHtVpuoImbr+/hcJcZd7ntJR ht1dS1T6DJhpec1Fwoc4AnorJ/q4iQdTirRH1bPFaXdMrWa92SsDgNoRqmyDB8Pg0ZHx kERueTV46DH0Z2a6BpcqC4+7DXvZNqAyKKwKqqcrrOu0hala/wi9EhrUoRwcn+dhife0 ty/RgY8OEKUEMl4Ml17W2GQJHMx0e3JM/DEFEYFbqFS9X9i+3v/qXkOXkgGpSpk4npkE qmWw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=5C+bzIA+7KM9xkqGFG3EJbnj3feJ8TznhIvgkPyAQi4=; b=E0Mn/Ul4ChtxCRuc5Dhn85OIE3rAXUfHrsV0KfBSDN8AU8bnfjYuXWEvrvrehZUq+/ sxta+JQcecRoEczzkxTkfuOh6qdQBLiqBpBO7GkfllhMQxKTMypRNqd2M3SG6i3kWrLR VFd2yzKloUs6lA0fNJdbLZcsuZseAyABdKTvXpRcqyw2Q0ItdH9P32ItlVB/Hb9hLczs 5RTBATU9noOliLItdsrt4LvAoK1gK80DN3Nr9HFgezqUtphNiRfxzJk8+MQcA7/L9DkI DNdvghou4Pz3v8jSrvCezghVbAz6LxaTBaR0tV4TK0BDb97Q1l+5y7jHZZi6gK3SA4lG jBvQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJIlAXSCyxRqcFTSZzF2tvv7vuOYW8wBUoWDleKbNPaccw/Es4jvz1UjrfP3prV+P0He+SDjuxO/Q5ZEcQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.142.37 with SMTP id rt5mr25999420igb.15.1459382347402; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 16:59:07 -0700 (PDT) Sender: kob6558@gmail.com Received: by 10.79.35.31 with HTTP; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 16:59:07 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 16:59:07 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: jRXSf0ERDuaeDq2SoXiRbhQRjTw Message-ID: Subject: Re: Multiple ffmpeg versions in ports From: Kevin Oberman To: Ben Woods Cc: FreeBSD ports Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.21 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 23:59:08 -0000 On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 2:39 PM, Ben Woods wrote: > On 30 March 2016 at 23:28, Ben Woods wrote: > > > > > What do you think about having numerous versions of ffmpeg in ports, > > similar to lang/python? > > > > > I guess the obvious question is how could it be possible for multiple > ffmpeg versions to be installed at the same time? Is it possible to ensure > the files do not overlap, and that each package is linking against the > correct installed version? > > -- > From: Benjamin Woods > woodsb02@gmail.com > Probably speaking out of turn, but we do have ffmpeg0 and ffmpeg in ports now. For quite some time we had ffmpeg1, as well, but I think all ports have now moved on, so ffmpeg1 was removed. It would be up to someone to write he support for a separate ffmpeg3/ -- Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer E-mail: rkoberman@gmail.com PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683 From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Mar 31 03:05:18 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AB04AE37C9 for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2016 03:05:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from FreeBSD@shaneware.biz) Received: from ipmail06.adl6.internode.on.net (ipmail06.adl6.internode.on.net [150.101.137.145]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F9C21BB7 for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2016 03:05:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from FreeBSD@shaneware.biz) Received: from ppp118-210-182-127.lns20.adl6.internode.on.net (HELO leader.local) ([118.210.182.127]) by ipmail06.adl6.internode.on.net with ESMTP; 31 Mar 2016 13:30:07 +1030 Subject: Re: Multiple ffmpeg versions in ports To: Ben Woods References: Cc: FreeBSD ports From: Shane Ambler Message-ID: <56FC92B5.6060005@ShaneWare.Biz> Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2016 13:30:05 +1030 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2016 03:05:18 -0000 On 31/03/2016 10:29, Kevin Oberman wrote: > On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 2:39 PM, Ben Woods wrote: > >> On 30 March 2016 at 23:28, Ben Woods wrote: >> >>> >>> What do you think about having numerous versions of ffmpeg in ports, >>> similar to lang/python? >>> >> >> >> I guess the obvious question is how could it be possible for multiple >> ffmpeg versions to be installed at the same time? Is it possible to ensure >> the files do not overlap, and that each package is linking against the >> correct installed version? >> >> -- >> From: Benjamin Woods >> woodsb02@gmail.com >> > > Probably speaking out of turn, but we do have ffmpeg0 and ffmpeg in ports > now. For quite some time we had ffmpeg1, as well, but I think all ports > have now moved on, so ffmpeg1 was removed. It would be up to someone to > write he support for a separate ffmpeg3/ ffmpeg, ffmpeg0 and ffmpeg1 when it existed, can all be installed simultaneously. If you look through the ffmep0 Makefile you will find it adds a 0 suffix to the binaries, libraries and dirs installed to prevent conflicts. The ffmpeg configure step supports specifying the dirs to install into as well as the suffix to add. It may be time ffmpeg is updated to 3.x and the current ffmepg could be moved to ffmpeg2. It is only a matter of someone making and maintaining the port/s for each version, probably more to the point is how many other ports would need a version other than what is in ffmpeg. -- FreeBSD - the place to B...Software Developing Shane Ambler From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Mar 31 08:43:00 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C1A0AE44E9 for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2016 08:43:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AB3E175F for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2016 08:43:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 2A119AE44E7; Thu, 31 Mar 2016 08:43:00 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27563AE44E6 for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2016 08:43:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.freebsd.org (portscout.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1BB4B175E for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2016 08:43:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.123]) by portscout.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u2V8gxM2024434 for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2016 08:42:59 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id u2V8gx3b024433; Thu, 31 Mar 2016 08:42:59 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201603310842.u2V8gx3b024433@portscout.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2016 08:42:59 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2016 08:43:00 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ emulators/mame | 0.166 | mame0172 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ emulators/mess | 0.166 | mame0172 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Thanks. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Mar 31 10:47:45 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D364AAE4227 for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2016 10:47:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lukasz@wasikowski.net) Received: from mail.freebsd.systems (mail.freebsd.systems [IPv6:2001:41d0:2:1276::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9FACF1C5C for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2016 10:47:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lukasz@wasikowski.net) Received: from [192.168.138.100] (unknown [194.181.86.74]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.freebsd.systems (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C8864344 for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2016 12:47:34 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=wasikowski.net; s=default; t=1459421254; bh=tPzCFkTx4kBRPXn6TgeQlL5S4eTN/xVGeFkKv66Pl0E=; h=To:From:Date; b=ryMWPsK1WLOuq260Ik6el9zc9kSWDjPA/uxn4CsH6CSAkDVoaQc4WzlPEE5yhkZPA HdTNQtxB5GKPB+HhhFoqV+C+EAMryvOaFVCDx/4f/9CpWLnkeZLyZVNy5m/w1+ce3Y XmlGQ+Tpm7nvDaLYHjt1FPG0wIQvn5mscHg5b8o4PgHvOZLxAsnYCI/RQvp0sHNDny x//JxV+68NCp9ZoTW71tpFCaJbwV+xw8stJ9O7bLsa9kWNnNwqkDc1e/n/7rt6hsyc wvQ1w2eEx/OcmWR6hXYS4UHu3kV1WPLsw5Xuh7serdkMIr3WOsyMKqUmX3HnZ44lCs iNvK7a5xX3w1Q== To: FreeBSD From: =?UTF-8?Q?=c5=81ukasz_W=c4=85sikowski?= Subject: Looking for good sould with a commit bit Message-ID: <56FD002F.4090903@wasikowski.net> Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2016 12:47:11 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2016 10:47:45 -0000 I'm looking for someone with a commit bit to look at https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208148 It has maintainer approval. -- best regards, Lukasz Wasikowski From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Mar 31 10:54:15 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25A46AE4418 for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2016 10:54:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mueller6722@twc.com) Received: from dnvrco-oedge-vip.email.rr.com (dnvrco-outbound-snat.email.rr.com [107.14.73.231]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFEB110CA for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2016 10:54:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mueller6722@twc.com) Received: from [96.28.178.143] ([96.28.178.143:55530] helo=localhost) by dnvrco-oedge03 (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 3.5.0.35861 r(Momo-dev:tip)) with ESMTP id F6/17-31587-E100DF65; Thu, 31 Mar 2016 10:46:55 +0000 Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2016 10:46:01 +0000 Message-ID: From: "Thomas Mueller" To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: Warren Block Subject: Re: devel/arduino - bad advice given in pkg-message References: <56F55A84.6080000@unfs.us> <56F71D44.1080302@unfs.us> X-RR-Connecting-IP: 107.14.64.142:25 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=U6scDIbu c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=RKm8ZHSrUWUxlfG+7GhaOw==:117 a=RKm8ZHSrUWUxlfG+7GhaOw==:17 a=L9H7d07YOLsA:10 a=9cW_t1CCXrUA:10 a=s5jvgZ67dGcA:10 a=tRul87jowE4A:10 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=8NF-qPB8xSyjJCITEoIA:9 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2016 10:54:15 -0000 On Sun, 27 Mar 2016, Warren Block wrote: > Here is how I propose to rewrite that: > > -G grouplist Set secondary group memberships for an account. > grouplist is a comma, space, or tab-separated list of > group names or group numbers. /etc/group is modified > to include the user's name in the groups specified in > grouplist. The user's name is removed from all > groups not specified. Group membership changes do not > take effect for current user login sessions, > requiring the user to reconnect to be affected by the > changes. Note: do not add a user to their primary > group with grouplist. > Modified version committed in > https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/head/usr.sbin/pw/pw.8?r1=297330&r2=297329&pathrev=297330 I've been following this thread, have this question: How does one add a user to additional groups without removing the user from groups the user is already in? I just looked at the new manpage from a fresh svn update of src tree. Tom From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Mar 31 10:56:27 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25005AE4553 for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2016 10:56:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 000.fbsd@quip.cz) Received: from elsa.codelab.cz (elsa.codelab.cz [94.124.105.4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E166311EF for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2016 10:56:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 000.fbsd@quip.cz) Received: from elsa.codelab.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by elsa.codelab.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE71828416; Thu, 31 Mar 2016 12:56:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from illbsd.quip.test (ip-86-49-16-209.net.upcbroadband.cz [86.49.16.209]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by elsa.codelab.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C03032840C; Thu, 31 Mar 2016 12:56:16 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <56FD0250.4000301@quip.cz> Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2016 12:56:16 +0200 From: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:35.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/35.0 SeaMonkey/2.32 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?UTF-8?Q?=c5=81ukasz_W=c4=85sikowski?= , FreeBSD Subject: Re: Looking for good soul with a commit bit / apachetop References: <56FD002F.4090903@wasikowski.net> In-Reply-To: <56FD002F.4090903@wasikowski.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2016 10:56:27 -0000 Łukasz Wąsikowski wrote on 03/31/2016 12:47: > I'm looking for someone with a commit bit to look at > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208148 > > It has maintainer approval. Thank you for providing mirror for sources! +1 please unbreak this port. Miroslav Lachman From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Mar 31 13:13:20 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADDC3AE40EE for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2016 13:13:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mailinglists@toco-domains.de) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B3321DAB for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2016 13:13:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mailinglists@toco-domains.de) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 9A5D9AE40ED; Thu, 31 Mar 2016 13:13:20 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A031AE40EC for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2016 13:13:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mailinglists@toco-domains.de) Received: from toco-domains.de (mail.toco-domains.de [IPv6:2a01:4f8:150:50a5::6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 66F441DA9 for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2016 13:13:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mailinglists@toco-domains.de) Received: from [192.168.0.143] (port-212-202-156-99.static.qsc.de [212.202.156.99]) by toco-domains.de (Postfix) with ESMTPA id E36351AAF09F; Thu, 31 Mar 2016 15:13:17 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: mail/roundcube (bsd.php.mk broken?) To: Michelle Sullivan , Mike Jakubik References: <56F3111B.4030901@madpilot.net> <56F31E0A.4070303@quip.cz> <66682188ccb793d95f477caf3ffc91b3@intertainservices.com> <56F3DB1F.8040803@sorbs.net> Cc: Ports From: =?UTF-8?Q?Torsten_Z=c3=bchlsdorff?= Message-ID: <56FB75A4.7010606@toco-domains.de> Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 08:43:48 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <56F3DB1F.8040803@sorbs.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2016 13:13:20 -0000 On 24.03.2016 13:18, Michelle Sullivan wrote: > Mike Jakubik wrote: >> On 2016-03-23 06:51 PM, Miroslav Lachman wrote: >>> Guido Falsi wrote on 03/23/2016 22:56: >>>> On 03/23/16 22:26, Mike Jakubik wrote: >>>>> Hello, >>>>> >>>>> I am getting the following errors trying to update roundcube, this >>>>> is on >>>>> FreeBSD 9, using default version of php (5.4). I've tried adding >>>>> DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=php=5.4 to make.conf but that did not make >>>>> difference. >>>>> Any ideas? >>>> >>>> Are you tracking the head of the ports tree or the 2016Q1 branch? I'm >>>> guessing you're with ports head. >>>> >>>> In head the default php version is 5.6 and version 5.4 has been removed >>>> because it has reached EOL on September 3rd, 2015. >>>> >>>> you could also use php 5.5, but it will EOL in July, so, if you're >>>> tracking the head of the ports tree, I'd suggest you try again using >>>> php >>>> 5.6. >>>> >>>> If you're tracking 2016Q1 it should work, and I don't really know >>>> what's >>>> happening. >>> >>> I think that "Malformed conditional" errors are caused by too old >>> "make". I have seen this error on old machines in the process of >>> upgrade to 10.2 (old 'make' working with newer Makefiles) >>> >>> What version of 9.x it is? >>> >>> Miroslav Lachman >> >> It is fairly up to date world/kernel. >> >> FreeBSD illidan.local 9.3-STABLE FreeBSD 9.3-STABLE #0 r293423: Fri >> Jan 8 11:50:36 EST 2016 > > To quote Steve Hartland on the 19th Feb 2016: > >> > Yes but 9.x is already legacy and becomes unsupported in December of >> > this year, > > .. but don't worry .. its not the only thing that is broken in the ports > tree for 9.x ... basically for many things now the ports tree is > unusable and quarterlies are unusable because they contain known > security issues in most cases which will never be backported "Because > its too hard".. According to the same email thread the answer to the > question there was to migrate to 10.2-BETA2 in the production environment. That makes me curious. About which security issues do you talk? Maybe i can have a look at them. Greetings, Torsten From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Mar 31 14:41:01 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E413AE4363 for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2016 14:41:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jankyj@unfs.us) Received: from stig.purplehat.org (stig.purplehat.org [50.243.134.106]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D7F41A9C for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2016 14:41:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jankyj@unfs.us) Received: from localhost (bill.goatse.unfs.us [50.243.134.106]) by stig.purplehat.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4247A59F24; Thu, 31 Mar 2016 08:40:49 -0600 (MDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=unfs.us; s=mail; t=1459435249; bh=+3KIwWR7ctjZkXWdKATS1nUI/ZOmJILC7eMc3xoZBq4=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=INXHV8ZcVog+1puond78sgSBhYdzTtMVPpaLSkY9kyv9ce0OLXMQPCGuouHWQKYnL qT3VqwghBux7qIfUjrnSQfE290Auu19e3u22h1eu+JPPJKIAfggnUlMO9KgU3kkZyo ANKmnFLfJ0LuDed3FaD6stQvNmX3Yi2oC9ZhsLz8= Received: from stig.purplehat.org ([50.243.134.106]) by localhost (stig.purplehat.org [50.243.134.106]) (maiad, port 10024) with ESMTP id 67713-08; Thu, 31 Mar 2016 08:40:47 -0600 (MDT) Received: from drp01-dev.enwd.co.sc.charterlab.com (chtr-v.purplehat.org [172.30.30.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jankyj@unfs.us) by stig.purplehat.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 645EC59EFD; Thu, 31 Mar 2016 08:40:47 -0600 (MDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=unfs.us; s=mail; t=1459435247; bh=+3KIwWR7ctjZkXWdKATS1nUI/ZOmJILC7eMc3xoZBq4=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=B2Hp+rYpQ9nKKcufm6i0YOjVX1Who3sgGdgyuoYc5BTa3wJYK93FqGRL9uKgL1e5P buk+DfoS2fDpTERi24JYmAg7rG8NBYuleMVlh99OpH4QUEBW9uBOj2IDSfBz/GH85+ NlCfjvGae2Tdm1XwMllo4zP1dXgMdLw9wAG40joc= Subject: Re: devel/arduino - bad advice given in pkg-message To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <56F55A84.6080000@unfs.us> <56F71D44.1080302@unfs.us> From: "Janky Jay, III" Message-ID: <56FD36EE.8070506@unfs.us> Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2016 08:40:46 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2016 14:41:01 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello Tom, On 03/31/2016 04:46 AM, Warren Block wrote: > On Sun, 27 Mar 2016, Warren Block wrote: > >> Here is how I propose to rewrite that: >> >> -G grouplist Set secondary group memberships for an account. >> grouplist is a comma, space, or tab-separated list of group names >> or group numbers. /etc/group is modified to include the user's >> name in the groups specified in grouplist. The user's name is >> removed from all groups not specified. Group membership changes >> do not take effect for current user login sessions, requiring the >> user to reconnect to be affected by the changes. Note: do not >> add a user to their primary group with grouplist. > >> Modified version committed in >> https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/head/usr.sbin/pw/pw.8?r1=297330&r2=29 7329&pathrev=297330 > >> > I've been following this thread, have this question: > > How does one add a user to additional groups without removing the > user from groups the user is already in? > > I just looked at the new manpage from a fresh svn update of src > tree. > This was actually covered in this thread (first post, actually) by Torfinn Ingolfsen: "Better to use this: pw groupmod dialer -m myuser it will ony affect the dialer group, and not mess with any other groups. " The above will add the user "myuser" to the "dialer" group while leaving the user's other group intact as well. Regards, Janky Jay, III -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEARECAAYFAlb9Nu4ACgkQGK3MsUbJZn7exACfZiXwVfIE762df3rfxVmdpd/K CKkAnjgBMJ3ewsIlYlQB5OhkbKx2opT6 =Or1f -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Mar 31 18:25:54 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74C67AD69BB for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2016 18:25:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mathiasp@mathiaspicker.net) Received: from mail.ngintelligence.com (mail.ngintelligence.com [5.9.85.176]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 39638176D for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2016 18:25:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mathiasp@mathiaspicker.net) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail.ngintelligence.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 132228A0553 for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2016 20:20:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail.ngintelligence.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.ngintelligence.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id tg-IXDp9vNBo for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2016 20:20:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail.ngintelligence.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 882D88A0599 for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2016 20:20:54 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.ngintelligence.com Received: from mail.ngintelligence.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.ngintelligence.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id njMuJAXnmZgB for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2016 20:20:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: from crest2.fritz.box (x5ce64838.dyn.telefonica.de [92.230.72.56]) by mail.ngintelligence.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 48C6D8A0553 for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2016 20:20:54 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <1459448404.36265.19.camel@mathiaspicker.net> Subject: synth just deleted 290 ports on my machine on second try ;) From: Mathias Picker To: freebsd-ports Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2016 20:20:04 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.16.5 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2016 18:25:54 -0000 Very funny, for a system that advertises as "just install and run". What happened: I installed synth (out of curiosity) and did a sudo synth upgrade-system on my FreeBSD 10.2-RELEASE-p9 system a few days ago. Synth then build aboout 800 packages, then deleted many of them again (???) citing a "failed dependency check", then installed a few updated ones. I started synth again yesterday to see if it was just something strange in ports the first time, and it was allmost the same, building about 800 packages, deleting many of them, only now synth then had pkg delete a few hundred installed packages on my machine. WTF? I mean, deleting kdelibs and evolution is not a nice action. The system was mostly using the FreeBSD repository before. I only build password-store, blender and apache24 from ports, all because of some non-standard settings. Any tips on what to do now? Trying to reinstall evolution makes pkg want to downgrade itself (1.6.4 to 1.6.2, which doesn't really work all that well, it goes into and endless loop after pkg 1.6.2 is installed. I've fixed this, but I guess the same will happen when I try to install kde via pkg. What can I do now, other than using portmaster to rebuild all ports? Thanks, Mathias P.S.: synth logs, terminal output and pkg info are at http://virtual -earth.de/synth-logs.txz From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Mar 31 18:26:32 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A59BAD6A25 for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2016 18:26:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from timp87@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wm0-x236.google.com (mail-wm0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0AEF51864 for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2016 18:26:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from timp87@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wm0-x236.google.com with SMTP id p65so125389132wmp.0 for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2016 11:26:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=9Xe4yhwYeqWW3HDHAKq+AXFIWu4BmrI/+6Ag2se+AAs=; b=QUFoj87d0Vx7X0lx/uKC5Ksoz2YtpXOEPYFmg1Lkfn7NTHMMZQy/F16xIyctGncZgo 0nATRdsMPwL2/c0U1of/2E7XsExy+TaM+9ajCBb//JTY553YLQdnXmKzR1jb1fiadUi2 nocYqAknJvOHyHNkvV+HkvQjuOxmK5Euck9+jE5y3dNjzDIF+IgO/ol4lhSltSOK0MyM pRyg/+OHOgpfyXyHRCgdEpswIHozHR4gveaZvgtvFzn216CbMawtTd3obRL8T+cANpni 4GJf5X1PYMIF67bclXDVeSqHDHlmfHaY37KLNCdrdgg3FFt7P1X763BhujcZhle5FvkJ Z08w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to; bh=9Xe4yhwYeqWW3HDHAKq+AXFIWu4BmrI/+6Ag2se+AAs=; b=lLjgXOHTQGDhQfCNsD7lGuYa1XE1M0wGRAD/O575iTHP/GnD5OKyZrnlYfh83Kpuic p0oh7UbuXGPB0Z8OWQVpKWpDQU3XQCXYNuIVRCIvXAlj0bi7jQx1Lg4f6NGT1o43jmn4 1kgQDwdn4CS/HwWoXGybvPpWQOg+3elYgJcgjH6b4szbZr2sxbF6DQeYksSgoXOYOgF5 JNzsIQpgEJQ3v7Besu3EyLlaJqMXnlz5/s0/nso8rXBeCPs4e/XUx3oqcWUiMPIP3wZA bD59cT0Bi9+qrimEB4b1uMQzAB05nQ9fzhiwrWW4Rw+h6NSPHyyibrqwvw05Hrh/MkH3 Wk0A== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJIi+ljA8ufaYpeP0L+a/xhPZM6wFKeg63rVrTfeaXLgKT083xH/ae+hGk7BPT4JTYj1aTmlWX73vp8PGQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.28.88.15 with SMTP id m15mr332183wmb.60.1459448790445; Thu, 31 Mar 2016 11:26:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.28.49.7 with HTTP; Thu, 31 Mar 2016 11:26:30 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2016 21:26:30 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: www/squid changes From: Pavel Timofeev To: ports-list freebsd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2016 18:26:32 -0000 2016-03-30 15:51 GMT+03:00 Pavel Timofeev : > Hello! > Can anybody take a look at > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208290? > Thanks! I'd like it to be committed before new quarter branch is made. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Mar 31 18:27:58 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90944AD6B72 for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2016 18:27:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 53D0F1A6F for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2016 18:27:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.86_2 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1alhK2-000F2M-Nv; Thu, 31 Mar 2016 20:27:58 +0200 Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2016 20:27:58 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> Cc: ??ukasz W??sikowski , FreeBSD Subject: Re: Looking for good soul with a commit bit / apachetop Message-ID: <20160331182758.GY35640@home.opsec.eu> References: <56FD002F.4090903@wasikowski.net> <56FD0250.4000301@quip.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <56FD0250.4000301@quip.cz> X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2016 18:27:58 -0000 Hi! > Lukasz Wasikowski wrote on 03/31/2016 12:47: > > I'm looking for someone with a commit bit to look at > > > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208148 > > > > It has maintainer approval. > > Thank you for providing mirror for sources! > > +1 please unbreak this port. Done. -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 4 years to go ! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Mar 31 18:37:06 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F41F6AD6EC7 for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2016 18:37:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B75A11FDE for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2016 18:37:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.86_2 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1alhSt-000F3F-P5; Thu, 31 Mar 2016 20:37:07 +0200 Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2016 20:37:07 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Pavel Timofeev Cc: ports-list freebsd Subject: Re: www/squid changes Message-ID: <20160331183707.GZ35640@home.opsec.eu> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2016 18:37:06 -0000 Hi! > > Can anybody take a look at > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208290? > > Thanks! > > I'd like it to be committed before new quarter branch is made. @work -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 4 years to go ! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Mar 31 19:05:47 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDA30AE4A23 for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2016 19:05:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A23D218E7 for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2016 19:05:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.86_2 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1alhuf-000F5l-VY; Thu, 31 Mar 2016 21:05:49 +0200 Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2016 21:05:49 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Pavel Timofeev , ports-list freebsd Subject: Re: www/squid changes Message-ID: <20160331190549.GA35640@home.opsec.eu> References: <20160331183707.GZ35640@home.opsec.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160331183707.GZ35640@home.opsec.eu> X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2016 19:05:48 -0000 Hi! > > > Can anybody take a look at > > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208290? > > > Thanks! > > > > I'd like it to be committed before new quarter branch is made. > > @work Done, thanks for the reminder! -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 4 years to go ! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Apr 1 03:45:38 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94BA9AE509E for ; Fri, 1 Apr 2016 03:45:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from t@tobik.me) Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5172B19AD for ; Fri, 1 Apr 2016 03:45:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from t@tobik.me) Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BF6720215 for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2016 23:45:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: from web1 ([10.202.2.211]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 31 Mar 2016 23:45:35 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tobik.me; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:message-id :mime-version:subject:to:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=SQW Mame5KuOTRl0Q9QVJvkeCkYc=; b=Q1ohrGHwjyoZ628NpjhWNE2N5D4xDTA813m 7+1I/SK2bGhBQSJ6vn/iF6sb1gpmKvogbKzNSCsbNf8rBPaT2jXn6ZBmtq8U7VSN WAYnTJK3gmFXDjwR8aaqiNzsU36Yf6dsi19S7hdviBLDD8YPw31QYWYy6/PIsUwH +k2hcwmk= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:to:x-sasl-enc :x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=SQWMame5KuOTRl0Q9QVJvkeCkYc=; b=SABBz p6c80qgHLPCaRaH1wvILz6TTNXrVigX8idkQuwarskOdreK4+dKBE4xQDWwjNPWm ZOb1yfDLnzw0rJ9ySMONG4kBviECHSKa+SzYoCkmQCpzkvqUsAdBpgoZf1/qhj0j HHAo5c6oyiVOvL1Ne1eDDcwRiuvRniJnNiolrQ= Received: by web1.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 99) id 1032FAEC3B6; Thu, 31 Mar 2016 23:45:35 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <1459482335.2471535.565384642.2E8B10FB@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-Sasl-Enc: QSNyVozsrX7qbpDI5ireqioNK5W3ZKVZL4W0yCWWPKyg 1459482335 From: Tobias Kortkamp To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-2373d6a1 Subject: Can someone commit these updates? Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2016 05:45:35 +0200 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2016 03:45:38 -0000 devel/gradle: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203969 Uncommitted since October 2015. sysutils/showbeastie: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208283 This should unbreak the build on HEAD and also now displays a menu frame and brand in addition to the loader logo. devel/leiningen: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207913 Thanks! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Apr 1 04:21:00 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4820CAE58B9 for ; Fri, 1 Apr 2016 04:21:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from felix@userspace.com.au) Received: from ma01-01.tyo.userspace.com.au (ma01-01.tyo.userspace.com.au [IPv6:2400:8900::f03c:91ff:fe18:3774]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17B0315E9 for ; Fri, 1 Apr 2016 04:21:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from felix@userspace.com.au) Received: from localhost (220-244-163-200.tpgi.com.au [220.244.163.200]) by ma01-01.tyo.userspace.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2CB0BC082 for ; Fri, 1 Apr 2016 04:20:54 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2016 15:20:36 +1100 From: Felix Hanley To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: QA needed for net/libnss-pgsql Message-ID: <20160401042036.GA3057@hewie.yelnah> Reply-To: felix@userspace.com.au MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="LZvS9be/3tNcYl/X" Content-Disposition: inline X-Attribution: Felix Hanley Organization: User Space, https://userspace.com.au/ X-PGP-Key: fp="971C F7B2 913A D163 70AC 02C3 B6F2 29D7 7E20 D10B"; id="0xb6f229d77e20d10b"; get=; get=; User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2016 04:21:00 -0000 --LZvS9be/3tNcYl/X Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, How can I get this new port moving again? https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D178333 Thanks, -felix --=20 email: felix@userspace.com.au web: https://userspace.com.au/ phone: +61 3 9021 8964 gpg: 971C F7B2 913A D163 70AC 02C3 B6F2 29D7 7E20 D10B --LZvS9be/3tNcYl/X Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAABCAAGBQJW/fcRAAoJELbyKdd+INEL744P+QHY8bv+hBqLhKAz0idSVYc+ fxZ5ooyFzgUObdRMDyTWr7jRfDyiEndlaap5zbhYz7/ZPgLCk9FliRYI0AXqWZti wO02cqXXbODKI6xNuG+aLJ31rkX7R5vYOrrE8n5DMRgGepanzByrpNhi1jBrlRNQ x7d6U8XGGwL3HN+fPJAPZINuRlPye8vS7RUVYRag/WOpo8Gm+bwrjgIWZdeaNsD+ oAuAAJtdZbosOZ9Vr69Ve+OWHW2buj7Ji85sM/HOzT9xTA1pEWmWwvrcFy2WtVV0 6/BZ4EY5LSTWrL9eNA3m8TkbLM8VLczOVO+csiOsMQuCrx7loH+4X+a4bueMxd3P 4uCNdFjKu+LoxO84fFXZncVKO/FKiMqJvrsygYp5BiypEnLfnIdlWIjtjXb8LJdl rB28UCjZFR5fRuKuYrFdA1leRQU3YUmz/AlPRJoWW3JQ2JJ2n/wxq086ErueP+Fd ht8vdd57Y4UD/DK2QzfS6aT9GGskwf1wpxLj2j++TX02Q+nqOPNFwj5DRlb0kvKf 5euI2gBt2dqBYNKCzCwd52eMTv8Xmn7O1w2XY/bZuT0ybUkiMTVDBgbuwtNLOCkm 7w5syLKuafM99vh0Zdoc+Huf1wQDjLWCRjg+gLuYOEIvtI/iyaaTKg0E+YP5uGYg L4ObD5bgMM7q9K9oXQwz =sQIc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --LZvS9be/3tNcYl/X-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Apr 1 04:25:13 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E311AE5989 for ; Fri, 1 Apr 2016 04:25:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from timp87@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wm0-x234.google.com (mail-wm0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0936718E3 for ; Fri, 1 Apr 2016 04:25:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from timp87@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wm0-x234.google.com with SMTP id f198so9543263wme.0 for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2016 21:25:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc; bh=5LhsCpc+VrBMEIliQWvC4HqC6CgfmAFeZ6I6PdaPOAI=; b=B+vzNdS5D8K55DmQiQ4D4nzEG9gYC9zNqhhsnJaD9rtoqTwK18gwvA52VwtzbRK2s2 T1s/1gqiELfnKesfeunklXBbmh8H2gBVgGt09WkYdcDAHyO0+34PL9Y+7ZkkikQXEoDt Ro7qBEMEszizd84if5DeuxhIStx39+6tjH0IAwCrIwVNO6cZK/a0hM/rIxVfP+TUTHGu VweCXgUiP02bb2rFJvjdjP/LT3noSSyGn3Ta8ArFwB/i1h92fVYvxyj+f42rf/L6kTjo aTBPZQ7WxWVZLIvPDkxUO8UYmvf9+L8VdXjFS87j0W9E8yeTUvAaSqBFn+l0XddWaR3K 923w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=5LhsCpc+VrBMEIliQWvC4HqC6CgfmAFeZ6I6PdaPOAI=; b=L4o1PwjZGD4jlDvkGXlTgJThY2CPc7nv4nmvynn2UehRdxQVGouTzDKgLVHTnNojeQ uQfwp0sL+Y/1raAKQZ8CB7TqYw6WTyPwpb97KfWq7DJyYzwCihyPl6awxlaWOcDoSoXJ yqNfFJaKJyyL39RFI6Hz6Zyw3vzS5jvAABNnyaP2dUIzADNnb9NHZE7rC5jEnrGFV3kX 2UerVGcOk2ZDirg5e89WSQh7p99oljUilzanz1ShdDrTU0jmIOs0t85rudwa74hQRrx2 UGvfXKaiJDx/NXyzs9Cuuf27xIavNDQzdmr4Dh6epLMMkVD8kLRZEWmyvYujRFi0n2s+ L1eQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJLx5R2kTeKS0jkghupNm1wcSPnV5M6LUu/KsPjbMhXmfEzHSl4q+oHiDwVFRmsHcvgHRfMp0YyrHThrQg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.112.34 with SMTP id in2mr7410328wjb.160.1459484711380; Thu, 31 Mar 2016 21:25:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.28.49.7 with HTTP; Thu, 31 Mar 2016 21:25:11 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20160331190549.GA35640@home.opsec.eu> References: <20160331183707.GZ35640@home.opsec.eu> <20160331190549.GA35640@home.opsec.eu> Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2016 07:25:11 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: www/squid changes From: Pavel Timofeev To: Kurt Jaeger Cc: ports-list freebsd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2016 04:25:13 -0000 2016-03-31 22:05 GMT+03:00 Kurt Jaeger : > Hi! > >> > > Can anybody take a look at >> > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208290? >> > > Thanks! >> > >> > I'd like it to be committed before new quarter branch is made. >> >> @work > > Done, thanks for the reminder! > Thanks a lot! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Apr 1 04:34:15 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E5D5AE5C09 for ; Fri, 1 Apr 2016 04:34:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D4B471DDB for ; Fri, 1 Apr 2016 04:34:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.86_2 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1alqmh-000GaV-ME; Fri, 01 Apr 2016 06:34:11 +0200 Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2016 06:34:11 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Felix Hanley Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: QA needed for net/libnss-pgsql Message-ID: <20160401043411.GB35640@home.opsec.eu> References: <20160401042036.GA3057@hewie.yelnah> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160401042036.GA3057@hewie.yelnah> X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2016 04:34:15 -0000 Hi! > How can I get this new port moving again? > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178333 I had a quick check: - it fails to fetch ===> libnss-pgsql-1.5.0_1 depends on file: /usr/local/sbin/pkg - found => libnss-pgsql-1.5.0-beta.tar.gz doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/. => Attempting to fetch http://pgfoundry.org/frs/download.php/1878/libnss-pgsql-1.5.0-beta.tar.gz fetch: http://pgfoundry.org/frs/download.php/1878/libnss-pgsql-1.5.0-beta.tar.gz: Operation timed out - USE_PGSQL is no longer needed (and triggers a complaint) -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 4 years to go ! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Apr 1 04:35:02 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A949AAE5C62 for ; Fri, 1 Apr 2016 04:35:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A1331E7D for ; Fri, 1 Apr 2016 04:35:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.86_2 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1alqnU-000Gb0-2i; Fri, 01 Apr 2016 06:35:00 +0200 Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2016 06:35:00 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Tobias Kortkamp Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Can someone commit these updates? Message-ID: <20160401043500.GC35640@home.opsec.eu> References: <1459482335.2471535.565384642.2E8B10FB@webmail.messagingengine.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1459482335.2471535.565384642.2E8B10FB@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2016 04:35:02 -0000 Hi! > devel/gradle: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203969 > Uncommitted since October 2015. Done. It helps if the PR contains a link to the changelogs. For the rest, I'll look at them this evening. > sysutils/showbeastie: > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208283 > This should unbreak the build on HEAD and also now displays a menu frame > and brand in addition to the loader logo. > > devel/leiningen: > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207913 -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 4 years to go ! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Apr 1 07:31:51 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 643A0AEB51B for ; Fri, 1 Apr 2016 07:31:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from martin@waschbuesch.de) Received: from relay.waschbuesch.it (relay.waschbuesch.it [IPv6:2a00:cba0:0:100::3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.waschbuesch.it", Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 29E7B16EF for ; Fri, 1 Apr 2016 07:31:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from martin@waschbuesch.de) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=waschbuesch.de; s=dkim; h=Mime-Version:To:Date:Message-Id:Subject: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:From; bh=39Kauqsl2i7hVcZsv5GuEaeOuD14f4+DtOgqWE+WXbo=; b=LU/uR5jnOn0J0MV/2QpbTCUEPz 7JnhrS4V/d1Pe2PSencbieBl+JL03QQ3R7b9DiHsa/h7J2nZ1OFnDZyVyzmPHwr1hrUV0SjZzDlYb nHYMThJGWW4GPWeDDMq8RzLC9F6GkaEGdfsGm1mKlchlmUX4tdEVaZT9hgEyDQR/sMbU=; Received: by relay.waschbuesch.it with esmtpsa (TLSv1:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim) (envelope-from ) id 1altYa-000CcV-3e for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Fri, 01 Apr 2016 07:31:48 +0000 From: =?utf-8?Q?Martin_Waschb=C3=BCsch?= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Bug in poudriere? Message-Id: Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2016 09:31:47 +0200 To: ports-list freebsd Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\)) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2016 07:31:51 -0000 Hi all, I just noticed that while just running: root@dev:~# poudriere lists daemon -- Launch the poudriere daemon among possible commands, the manpage does not mention this at all. Personally, I'd consider this a bug, but am unsure how best to file a PR = for this? Best, Martin= From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Apr 1 08:54:07 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67AF2AE3CBF for ; Fri, 1 Apr 2016 08:54:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 564851F5B for ; Fri, 1 Apr 2016 08:54:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 55C1AAE3CBC; Fri, 1 Apr 2016 08:54:07 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55785AE3CB8 for ; Fri, 1 Apr 2016 08:54:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.freebsd.org (portscout.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49D691F5A for ; Fri, 1 Apr 2016 08:54:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.123]) by portscout.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u318s7Zv088511 for ; Fri, 1 Apr 2016 08:54:07 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id u318s7Ph088510; Fri, 1 Apr 2016 08:54:07 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201604010854.u318s7Ph088510@portscout.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2016 08:54:07 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2016 08:54:07 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ lang/sbcl | 1.3.1 | 1.3.4 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Thanks. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Apr 1 10:21:02 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7AE3AEB9CD for ; Fri, 1 Apr 2016 10:21:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from abi@abinet.ru) Received: from mail.abinet.ru (mail.abinet.ru [136.243.72.227]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81CCD1DA4 for ; Fri, 1 Apr 2016 10:21:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from abi@abinet.ru) Received: from mail.abinet.ru (web.abinet.ru [10.0.2.4]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.abinet.ru (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 81729D533 for ; Fri, 1 Apr 2016 10:12:10 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=abinet.ru; s=dkim; t=1459505530; bh=54vVFw7CQatO31qLSOLn/SjZTomxdXCEbgrOyhbgV4M=; h=Date:From:To:Subject; b=eBm6idV++oNiRyYxBagQfee1fn8gXcd3TAGTZnWskFjpmhZptLvKp/iTflbUvZfFd 8tu1cnYSNW9ZIZuqxMj2L6nqdYCAK3kg2udMaNMG69mIoGcP1As4CgtnepOYNJlJjp a6zGmuBsMIPsUayZ29UhWdv7nnsQxh9jsXVh/WeU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2016 13:12:10 +0300 From: abi@abinet.ru To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Create directory for www:www Message-ID: X-Sender: abi@abinet.ru User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.1.3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.21 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2016 10:21:02 -0000 Hello! I'm porting ZoneMinder, it needs folder, writable under web server user. I wrote in post-install something like this ${INSTALL} -d -g ${WWWGRP} -o ${WWWOWN} ${STAGEDIR}${WWWDIR}/images I can see right permissions in a stage directory, however, after installation a destination folder has root:wheel owner. How can create directory in a proper way? From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Apr 1 10:30:44 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 471ABAEBE0B for ; Fri, 1 Apr 2016 10:30:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 000.fbsd@quip.cz) Received: from elsa.codelab.cz (elsa.codelab.cz [94.124.105.4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0FCD1134F for ; Fri, 1 Apr 2016 10:30:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 000.fbsd@quip.cz) Received: from elsa.codelab.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by elsa.codelab.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADE7628459; Fri, 1 Apr 2016 12:30:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: from illbsd.quip.test (ip-86-49-16-209.net.upcbroadband.cz [86.49.16.209]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by elsa.codelab.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8C44028429; Fri, 1 Apr 2016 12:30:39 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <56FE4DCF.4060301@quip.cz> Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2016 12:30:39 +0200 From: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:35.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/35.0 SeaMonkey/2.32 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: abi@abinet.ru, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Create directory for www:www References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2016 10:30:44 -0000 abi@abinet.ru wrote on 04/01/2016 12:12: > > > Hello! > > I'm porting ZoneMinder, it needs folder, writable under web server user. > > > I wrote in post-install something like this > > ${INSTALL} -d -g ${WWWGRP} -o ${WWWOWN} ${STAGEDIR}${WWWDIR}/images > > I can see right permissions in a stage directory, however, after > installation a destination folder has root:wheel owner. > > How can create directory in a proper way? I am not experienced porter, but what about @owner and @group entries in plist? https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/porters-handbook/install.html https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/porters-handbook/plist-keywords.html Miroslav Lachman From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Apr 1 10:31:15 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6ED6AAEBE47 for ; Fri, 1 Apr 2016 10:31:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from baptiste.daroussin@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wm0-x243.google.com (mail-wm0-x243.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::243]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0643C14A5 for ; Fri, 1 Apr 2016 10:31:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from baptiste.daroussin@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wm0-x243.google.com with SMTP id 20so3481843wmh.3 for ; Fri, 01 Apr 2016 03:31:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=2Jtdngf760aUc0nZJjeVfE5fNpmITTl+zG7Vja+dY5M=; b=BmhqWKr/OhvyGOm+zyGapYQLbvstaeSMCxgiqRftIRKQSaH2YMbeSO/gLzpa1RFLo5 /pvNQmO2EP2jspYu6ExkWaAp9iC5RfksqnOdQDTDVrtJsM1JxNOjNBn7bVfBupkBdXA3 xMubbpHCbTs/ftB3M5qnsQcUEPDJZOeVMqa3GLVhrIHXmiqhgSArSVserbqRk91h9kx7 AeEsE/0mjZPIWplDv6uW99/2VGYTCQ0n95F60AyqDj71KCsn+K0l61n3zM/UM5LWk6dX RCcmDBSsdkayAGEaoeNvlansLUyRx5arOImPP4QcT3Lm2ic2vEiDZXRZM+sAH46FLMD0 ufcQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=2Jtdngf760aUc0nZJjeVfE5fNpmITTl+zG7Vja+dY5M=; b=krc2EfXGT9Yeemiu0DMPLUqMcQDzd9MNFspKiBPtbwsGYYmyP3cmvn7QRtXjciA1/e X3XWwHVHW0kFhQvB4vcXvQB0fgm/O1FDtSe5SNdagXYcOprlGNCJXYfEOH0jvnhZfGTz nfQY8gOK2yezgpGs0XAd/glNV0VgsaHQkTXMf7jXidrmLeOxUGtzwq4EOYbYn99WuFGV sjC3m5uwm4N9YMpy6XIqA9tsRKpuswHIp+ezPx75wqVw5g7ZCJ3YB/vT4J8ymghMNiD4 gWbkWTZNUbwC3W9q2RTF6BElWHZTa3VpSk5tIhBn65PWtX0+bgxs6N2xxD4mGYLkDRlC XLTg== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJLzxKHPtexeh+cNmMBfyfC4LNQPmahPMEE2BCx2jUKTgFoB1+eGOAMLzpkpB7apww== X-Received: by 10.28.73.66 with SMTP id w63mr3148019wma.53.1459506673547; Fri, 01 Apr 2016 03:31:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ivaldir.etoilebsd.net ([2001:41d0:8:db4c::1]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ks5sm13428264wjb.13.2016.04.01.03.31.12 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 01 Apr 2016 03:31:12 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Baptiste Daroussin Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2016 12:31:11 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: abi@abinet.ru Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Create directory for www:www Message-ID: <20160401103110.GG1128@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="PyMzGVE0NRonI6bs" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2016 10:31:15 -0000 --PyMzGVE0NRonI6bs Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 01:12:10PM +0300, abi@abinet.ru wrote: > =20 >=20 > Hello!=20 >=20 > I'm porting ZoneMinder, it needs folder, writable under web server user. >=20 >=20 > I wrote in post-install something like this=20 >=20 > ${INSTALL} -d -g ${WWWGRP} -o ${WWWOWN} ${STAGEDIR}${WWWDIR}/images=20 >=20 > I can see right permissions in a stage directory, however, after > installation a destination folder has root:wheel owner.=20 >=20 > How can create directory in a proper way?=20 Do not set the credential in the stage a simple mkdir is enough In the plist @dir(%%WWWOWN%%,%%WWWGRP%%,) %%WWWDIR%%/images Best regards, Bapt --PyMzGVE0NRonI6bs Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJW/k3uAAoJEGOJi9zxtz5aHDoQAOP8xTS17iUzp8uWHhLvWpOV udclNCiafqzceVZaup6JiaX3gMmjzWypIj0+FmWgu1UshR7l2ayLJaEAKRdwvezf 4r6Ye/QmlXqyGn+PqdOFUDtmsUUXbHJitiVA1YUbWlrcy1STOJMshc9yKKM+n5MN etEQ00Yx75H51wOuOqmTxII40M9Xb8pfKsb9+F3HNLp/c619zyzBKdVhAyj9FbrM wj9MXhsN+NzfYY5fBRQ6RUX+x8WlyWqtJDrAEGGzFl+QxDLqL7rkGJYuL55Kff3S tDppJABkqXI+uFKW0kOVcFGRhd20UBzENV0DneQ3ff1Bg94IBGN9VtN66+C42W3A tFgJ3KA6yrDQvHQ6FNCoMcBnnsNzNlTMXARPgqvIej54CXbX2o+j9nYB/vdLIL7+ 7Xhuz55JIW7VSQdCFc0xJ4LYAlbnXNKcJya8RkwtadC0PzvJVyK/bw8yzLiNDdCJ G9kX8NQS2+cQB8jZW82ibJ30CUK4H6wCaHOZ+l6teJ2CALjEpow/jpsB3VrTBBki lroBkpyGLQV2YnpN/MzJVd1fL9ucpQko7mC5WKvDL59dYPcojHqbzOgb75f3xgqM pa7KlkiBtcmL5fU7pswMRjXKvAC5FBHsMGzOW2lmr3UmFLDEXeuq+FSZ+NoQtDcI kWm3dWE2hbwpJjVUMi+b =vEQn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --PyMzGVE0NRonI6bs-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Apr 1 11:17:57 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B288DAEB10B for ; Fri, 1 Apr 2016 11:17:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mailinglists@toco-domains.de) Received: from toco-domains.de (mail.toco-domains.de [IPv6:2a01:4f8:150:50a5::6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F42F1318 for ; Fri, 1 Apr 2016 11:17:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mailinglists@toco-domains.de) Received: from [0.0.0.0] (mail.toco-domains.de [IPv6:2a01:4f8:150:50a5::6]) by toco-domains.de (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 861FC1AAF095 for ; Fri, 1 Apr 2016 13:17:55 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: synth just deleted 290 ports on my machine on second try ;) To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <1459448404.36265.19.camel@mathiaspicker.net> From: Torsten Zuehlsdorff Message-ID: <56FE58E3.2020803@toco-domains.de> Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2016 13:17:55 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1459448404.36265.19.camel@mathiaspicker.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2016 11:17:57 -0000 On 31.03.2016 20:20, Mathias Picker wrote: > What can I do now, other than using portmaster to rebuild all ports? You can use poudriere to rebuild all the ports and use its local repository for pkg. Greetings, Torsten From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Apr 1 11:51:14 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 579EAAEBEDB for ; Fri, 1 Apr 2016 11:51:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@passap.ru) Received: from forward16h.cmail.yandex.net (forward16h.cmail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:f35::a1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "forwards.mail.yandex.net", Issuer "Yandex CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1AE2517C0 for ; Fri, 1 Apr 2016 11:51:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@passap.ru) Received: from smtp4h.mail.yandex.net (smtp4h.mail.yandex.net [84.201.186.21]) by forward16h.cmail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 3DC6A21709; Fri, 1 Apr 2016 14:51:01 +0300 (MSK) Received: from smtp4h.mail.yandex.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp4h.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 202072C7E08; Fri, 1 Apr 2016 14:50:59 +0300 (MSK) Received: by smtp4h.mail.yandex.net (nwsmtp/Yandex) with ESMTPSA id 1haqpNJnYr-oxaKgXf4; Fri, 01 Apr 2016 14:50:59 +0300 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client certificate not present) X-Yandex-ForeignMX: US X-Yandex-Suid-Status: 1 0,1 1130000009210120 Subject: Re: Create directory for www:www To: abi@abinet.ru, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: From: Boris Samorodov Message-ID: <56FE609F.902@passap.ru> Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2016 14:50:55 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2016 11:51:14 -0000 01.04.16 13:12, abi@abinet.ru ŠæŠøшŠµŃ‚: > > > Hello! > > I'm porting ZoneMinder, it needs folder, writable under web server user. You may be interested in multimedia/zoneminder. -- WBR, Boris Samorodov (bsam) FreeBSD Committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Apr 1 13:51:52 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DB8BAEBA45 for ; Fri, 1 Apr 2016 13:51:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from abi@abinet.ru) Received: from mail.abinet.ru (mail.abinet.ru [136.243.72.227]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8CE21A68 for ; Fri, 1 Apr 2016 13:51:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from abi@abinet.ru) Received: from mail.abinet.ru (web.abinet.ru [10.0.2.4]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.abinet.ru (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6C8D4D5D7 for ; Fri, 1 Apr 2016 13:51:49 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=abinet.ru; s=dkim; t=1459518709; bh=cYa7zFeJQTpg2MhI2+DB37xks/IeBSOuBdTRK0UnU9U=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=AxoA0tC1YI/TPmTmRSLtYpPkAdnTcpM8VLFqGSgIPp4KHmz/S9jYyPbdH8yewtu0N qDAWYjJYN+wWgB+agn82aKjT9r1DCNnJn6unwDlgBT1HZv3TL2+qPExZUTbT8WlVHY bo3joyp6pIPaMME7cyH4xAQwRtci8u7JGqIGJpqw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2016 16:51:49 +0300 From: abi@abinet.ru To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Create directory for www:www In-Reply-To: <20160401103110.GG1128@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> References: <20160401103110.GG1128@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> Message-ID: X-Sender: abi@abinet.ru User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.1.3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.21 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2016 13:51:52 -0000 Great! Looks like I missed certain parts of Porter's Handbook Baptiste Daroussin ŠæŠøсŠ°Š» 2016-04-01 13:31: > On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 01:12:10PM +0300, abi@abinet.ru wrote: > >> Hello! >> >> I'm porting ZoneMinder, it needs folder, writable under web server user. >> >> I wrote in post-install something like this >> >> ${INSTALL} -d -g ${WWWGRP} -o ${WWWOWN} ${STAGEDIR}${WWWDIR}/images >> >> I can see right permissions in a stage directory, however, after >> installation a destination folder has root:wheel owner. >> >> How can create directory in a proper way? > > Do not set the credential in the stage a simple mkdir is enough > > In the plist > @dir(%%WWWOWN%%,%%WWWGRP%%,) %%WWWDIR%%/images > > Best regards, > Bapt From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Apr 1 15:23:50 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45F52AECDA0; Fri, 1 Apr 2016 15:23:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from papowell@astart.com) Received: from astart2.astart.com (wsip-72-214-30-30.sd.sd.cox.net [72.214.30.30]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3275B1313; Fri, 1 Apr 2016 15:23:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from papowell@astart.com) Received: from laptop_93.private (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by astart2.astart.com (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id u31FNgmd084212; Fri, 1 Apr 2016 08:23:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from papowell@astart.com) Reply-To: papowell@astart.com Subject: Re: HTML5 videos crashes Firefox References: <56F804E9.8050506@netfence.it> <56FAAB3D.10906@netfence.it> <56FD9728.1050505@netfence.it> To: Andrea Venturoli , c.brinkhaus@t-online.de Cc: gecko@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org From: Patrick Powell Organization: Astart Technologies Message-ID: <56FE927E.3020809@astart.com> Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2016 08:23:42 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <56FD9728.1050505@netfence.it> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2016 15:23:50 -0000 My setup is a little different. I have a Dell M6800 with NVIDEA: vgapci0: port 0xe000-0xe07f mem 0xf4000000-0xf4ffffff,0xe0000000-0xefffffff,0xf0000000-0xf1ffffff irq 16 at device 0.0 on pci1 nvidia0: on vgapci0 vgapci0: child nvidia0 requested pci_enable_io vgapci0: child nvidia0 requested pci_enable_io vgapci0: Boot video device From /var/log/Xorg.0.log: [ 12870.311] (II) LoadModule: "glx" [ 12870.311] (II) Loading /usr/local/lib/xorg/modules/extensions/libglx.so [ 12870.319] (II) Module glx: vendor="NVIDIA Corporation" [ 12870.319] compiled for 4.0.2, module version = 1.0.0 [ 12870.319] Module class: X.Org Server Extension [ 12870.319] (II) NVIDIA GLX Module 346.96 Sun Aug 23 21:29:48 PDT 2015 [ 12870.319] (II) LoadModule: "dbe" [ 12870.319] (II) Module "dbe" already built-in [ 12870.319] (II) LoadModule: "dri" [ 12870.319] (II) Module "dri" already built-in [ 12870.319] (II) LoadModule: "dri2" [ 12870.319] (II) Module "dri2" already built-in [ 12870.319] (II) LoadModule: "extmod" [ 12870.319] (II) Module "extmod" already built-in [ 12870.319] (II) LoadModule: "record" [ 12870.319] (II) Module "record" already built-in [ 12870.319] (II) LoadModule: "vnc" [ 12870.319] (II) Loading /usr/local/lib/xorg/modules/extensions/libvnc.so [ 12870.453] (II) Module vnc: vendor="Constantin Kaplinsky" [ 12870.453] compiled for 1.17.4, module version = 1.0.0 [ 12870.453] Module class: X.Org Server Extension [ 12870.453] ABI class: X.Org Server Extension, version 9.0 [ 12870.453] (II) LoadModule: "nvidia" [ 12870.463] (II) Loading /usr/local/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/nvidia_drv.so [ 12870.463] (II) Module nvidia: vendor="NVIDIA Corporation" [ 12870.463] compiled for 4.0.2, module version = 1.0.0 [ 12870.463] Module class: X.Org Video Driver [ 12870.463] (II) NVIDIA dlloader X Driver 346.96 Sun Aug 23 21:08:26 PDT 2015 [ 12870.463] (II) NVIDIA Unified Driver for all Supported NVIDIA GPUs [ 12870.463] (--) Using syscons driver with X support (version 16777218.0) [ 12870.463] (--) using VT number 9 When I run firefox and try to view a video from youtube I get: laptop_93: {10} % firefox |&tee /tmp/f Bus error (core dumped) I updated to the latest pkg versions of firefox. Side Note: I set up a couple of VirtualBox VMs, one for 10.3 RC3 and one for 9.3. Just out of curiousity I ran firefox on them and I was able to view the videos. I am wondering if the issue is related to the NVIDIA driver on my laptop. I wonder if the issue is related to the NVIDIA driver/GPU support. On 03/31/16 14:31, Andrea Venturoli wrote: >> On Tue, 29 Mar 2016 10:37:47 -0700, Christoph Brinkhaus wrote: > >> The only thing I get are error messages as below: >> $ ssh fox firefox >> libGL error: failed to open drm device: No such file or directory >> libGL error: failed to load driver: i965 >> libGL error: unable to load driver: swrast_dri.so >> libGL error: failed to load driver: swrast >> 1459272168729 addons.xpi WARN Bootstrap state is invalid >> (missing >> add-ons: > > Guess you have an Intel GPU (mine is a Radeon). > > > > I got another machine, which runs 10.1/amd64 with an Intel GPU and > that works fine (btw, not even those warnings). > I also saw you tried ssh to another box and I did that too. > > Just to summarize: > _ 10.2/i386/Radeon -> crash; > _ 10.1/amd64/Intel -> fine; > _ ssh from 10.2/i386/Radeon to 10.1/amd64/Intel -> fine. > > Patrick, could you please tell us what GPU you have? Configured options? > > > > Just wish I could get some info out of that core :( > > bye & Thanks > av. > -- Patrick Powell Astart Technologies papowell@astart.com 1530 Jamacha Rd, Suite X Network and System San Diego, CA 92019 Consulting 858-874-6543 FAX 858-751-2435 Web: www.astart.com From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Apr 1 15:30:53 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E081AECF35; Fri, 1 Apr 2016 15:30:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from c.brinkhaus@t-online.de) Received: from mailout06.t-online.de (mailout06.t-online.de [194.25.134.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mailout00.t-online.de", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 157E115CE; Fri, 1 Apr 2016 15:30:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from c.brinkhaus@t-online.de) Received: from fwd38.aul.t-online.de (fwd38.aul.t-online.de [172.20.26.138]) by mailout06.t-online.de (Postfix) with SMTP id 7CFC1595A98; Fri, 1 Apr 2016 17:30:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from esprimo.local (GoOHBUZpghcg1Rs5g5VOrjD1IKZEGuRoYFA57Pdavgy0TDEaUIQvSJBth46Wkd1wLF@[217.81.132.193]) by fwd38.t-online.de with (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) esmtp id 1am120-2Zn42C0; Fri, 1 Apr 2016 17:30:40 +0200 Received: from esprimo.local (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by esprimo.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DF3145CD9D; Fri, 1 Apr 2016 17:30:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from chris@localhost) by esprimo.local (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id u31FUdmq005093; Fri, 1 Apr 2016 17:30:39 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from chris) Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2016 17:30:39 +0200 From: Christoph Brinkhaus To: Andrea Venturoli Cc: gecko@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org, Patrick Powell Subject: Re: HTML5 videos crashes Firefox Message-ID: <20160401153039.GA2251@esprimo.local> References: <56F804E9.8050506@netfence.it> <56FAAB3D.10906@netfence.it> <56FD9728.1050505@netfence.it> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <56FD9728.1050505@netfence.it> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-ID: GoOHBUZpghcg1Rs5g5VOrjD1IKZEGuRoYFA57Pdavgy0TDEaUIQvSJBth46Wkd1wLF X-TOI-MSGID: 6b3ed2a6-0837-46b4-8081-022e2f943fb1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2016 15:30:53 -0000 On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 11:31:20PM +0200, Andrea Venturoli wrote: > > On Tue, 29 Mar 2016 10:37:47 -0700, Christoph Brinkhaus wrote: > > > The only thing I get are error messages as below: > > $ ssh fox firefox > > libGL error: failed to open drm device: No such file or directory > > libGL error: failed to load driver: i965 > > libGL error: unable to load driver: swrast_dri.so > > libGL error: failed to load driver: swrast > > 1459272168729 addons.xpi WARN Bootstrap state is invalid (missing > > add-ons: > > Guess you have an Intel GPU (mine is a Radeon). Hello Andrea, yes. /var/log/Xorg.0.log logs Integrated Graphics Chipset: Intel(R) 965Q > > I got another machine, which runs 10.1/amd64 with an Intel GPU and that > works fine (btw, not even those warnings). > I also saw you tried ssh to another box and I did that too. The ssh was to a jail in the same hardware but with a binary installation of the firefox. The jails name is box,-). > > Just to summarize: > _ 10.2/i386/Radeon -> crash; > _ 10.1/amd64/Intel -> fine; > _ ssh from 10.2/i386/Radeon to 10.1/amd64/Intel -> fine. > > Patrick, could you please tell us what GPU you have? Configured options? > > Just wish I could get some info out of that core :( At least it is good that you have found out the likely root cause. > > bye & Thanks > av. Kind regards, Christoph From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Apr 1 17:01:48 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3260DAEB195 for ; Fri, 1 Apr 2016 17:01:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E5D491762 for ; Fri, 1 Apr 2016 17:01:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.86_2 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1am2SB-000Hzt-S1; Fri, 01 Apr 2016 19:01:47 +0200 Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2016 19:01:47 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Tobias Kortkamp , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Can someone commit these updates? Message-ID: <20160401170147.GD35640@home.opsec.eu> References: <1459482335.2471535.565384642.2E8B10FB@webmail.messagingengine.com> <20160401043500.GC35640@home.opsec.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160401043500.GC35640@home.opsec.eu> X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2016 17:01:48 -0000 Hi! > > sysutils/showbeastie: > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208283 > > This should unbreak the build on HEAD and also now displays a menu frame > > and brand in addition to the loader logo. See the PR, it fails to build on current, does that matter ? > > devel/leiningen: > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207913 Done. -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 4 years to go ! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Apr 1 21:53:16 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FF30AEB50B for ; Fri, 1 Apr 2016 21:53:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sid4@mail.com) Received: from mout.gmx.com (mout.gmx.com [74.208.4.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E999710A7 for ; Fri, 1 Apr 2016 21:53:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sid4@mail.com) Received: from [108.70.50.7] by 3capp-mailcom-lxa03.server.lan (via HTTP); Fri, 1 Apr 2016 23:53:08 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: From: "Sid --" To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: net-im/libpurple grouping protocols in make config Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2016 23:53:08 +0200 Importance: normal Sensitivity: Normal X-Priority: 3 X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:SbSevazRxhD07WYwSOxqMQctaTQ5yqQtUXBIon6sSgv +lFzk1mFni4IqY7JCHgjtwotmJqP0qhRwaEOmH2/+aH0Zz3sY8 hUNE/EOmKW4h3lgTB+cVvcp4z7MEI2unOZdK0m2Qu6uKjcmQVb p6K7E3savIUwq9Ek4qd+MBJxaOboVhSBv+KfMJA5sCK0npEXJb OKitw1srbGc8NPrg79XwpkO/dZAWVjHdlTVflQI68RMIoHGlAh xZGROr8vvIaam+NdyvYE7ZcMm9CwpOVAjib43WJTP8yzUesUaX OJxdPqfrfO4/aO8ZEp1JfkSkC3W X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:mGIl7Rk+iXY=:me90Wp53CFo/VDXcbJQlsG jWHFitI+TQskYl9qfkT7j4Vj9U0GbbOJAWfUzPNrsKszlg9gLB6d6SXS4oUUiuZjnoGTz1CpX ZFSZDFgd0PtGjkLd5CSbA7N46TndKnB6W0LpzpStvOVXpTDKFyG47beaMogijpR5aidTMyGII MlvxrvfteQA6wkayhtU6Av40siQMdaKNUSaCfbwpbmHG4Io7N2u6G7uHgVlI+9L5hn0XRWAU/ 9uDCCCuku5JEPCBMa0pslHXhIyByrCUiWBMjRcODQQgZcTpX5KwBAXGK5Fh2jKtEYaoIKwf81 Awb5towIgeACk9IbaGNfmfv2jfd2Yh8Oz0HckTQXzCyuMLCC0QX9dcKm0wfN4eL8LrbskwPNg BUSitIPJP1Q6JbfqJ1N+N2JsH76AVr5LAzvRzLJfyrgDx4ZxbLiuy29cotW+Q9GwLWYWxGFqa epd5i5waTw== X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2016 21:53:16 -0000 Hi. Can someone adjust this for net-im/libpurple 's Makefile, the maintainers haven't responded yet. 44,46c44,45 < OPTIONS_DEFINE= BONJOUR DBUS GNUTLS NSS SASL GSTREAMER VV IDN PERL TCLTK \ < SAMETIME SILC GG IRC JABBER MSN MYSPACE NOVELL OSCAR QQ \ < SIMPLE YAHOO ZEPHYR --- > OPTIONS_DEFINE= DBUS GNUTLS NSS SASL GSTREAMER VV IDN PERL TCLTK > 68a68,71 > OPTIONS_GROUP= PROTOCOLS > OPTIONS_GROUP_PROTOCOLS= BONJOUR GG SAMETIME SILC IRC JABBER MSN MYSPACE \ > NOVELL OSCAR QQ SIMPLE YAHOO ZEPHYR The descriptions are already listed, and didn't need to be changed for this to work. It works the same, but the protocol options are moved into their own group, that can be seen when running make config. Bonjour acts like a protocol so I grouped it with the others. Thank you. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Apr 1 22:50:50 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64E6DAEC4BB for ; Fri, 1 Apr 2016 22:50:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bdrewery@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56156158A; Fri, 1 Apr 2016 22:50:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bdrewery@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail.xzibition.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F45D1A9E; Fri, 1 Apr 2016 22:50:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bdrewery@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail.xzibition.com (localhost [172.31.3.2]) by mail.xzibition.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0C3721105; Fri, 1 Apr 2016 22:50:49 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.xzibition.com Received: from mail.xzibition.com ([172.31.3.2]) by mail.xzibition.com (mail.xzibition.com [172.31.3.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with LMTP id tP5MUZVN8OSP; Fri, 1 Apr 2016 22:50:42 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: Bug in poudriere? DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.9.2 mail.xzibition.com 11C7421100 To: =?UTF-8?Q?Martin_Waschb=c3=bcsch?= , ports-list freebsd References: From: Bryan Drewery Organization: FreeBSD Message-ID: <56FEFB3E.2060905@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2016 15:50:38 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2016 22:50:50 -0000 On 4/1/16 12:31 AM, Martin Waschb=FCsch wrote: > Hi all, >=20 > I just noticed that while just running: >=20 > root@dev:~# poudriere >=20 > lists >=20 > daemon -- Launch the poudriere daemon >=20 > among possible commands, the manpage does not mention this at all. >=20 > Personally, I'd consider this a bug, but am unsure how best to file a P= R for this? >=20 It's pretty much the same as https://github.com/freebsd/poudriere/issues/= 333 It's there for later. --=20 Regards, Bryan Drewery From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Apr 2 06:17:51 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 509C8B0000B for ; Sat, 2 Apr 2016 06:17:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ig0-x234.google.com (mail-ig0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1B16211EC for ; Sat, 2 Apr 2016 06:17:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: by mail-ig0-x234.google.com with SMTP id f1so12596286igr.1 for ; Fri, 01 Apr 2016 23:17:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc; bh=ms7asK48bwsFuVKoEs568cnnz9FBurKnVckgTmGU5mM=; b=dgdVoAGvOcUXjaHiBflrO+0UYezTyRcVDGRrfpfDZkK9mPONwCVBd4oYecejfoWByV T3Wfi/1YXKhc2G2kl/RXOgIsML/qJH/z5HyJ5FmcEFl5EKOJnsJMI8604ygjBgvKh55F 8fF3iNEQBVYRjNa4aPWFp2gRWMyg4ymXSRTQNkLyGJdPeCcS2Teqdu19f+B3tzYy3vfQ O/wvzug9X+Odg460B7PIJbkKbXGudXxLGi7CnBX6TaJjSn5HXeaJtR4VURGs1fo5x1ER 6+qup48JYGUmC0YpBgpsZn/xOARcjEQ92PZj92Sz+WJbjMzMAVGmUGpk6pSAcqsYkHNo kFTQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=ms7asK48bwsFuVKoEs568cnnz9FBurKnVckgTmGU5mM=; b=H7NBXEb63PLcPTe+mZZ8lvPhtt5mm77Wg2T6eqr3rrw76gNcIbfK69J9sAVoz3l4z9 RQ28SxShPCu0WBZ0KCJDtDFOfdpJSG9P9jpEticW1ivpV4j1c+X6274AI+EPTSAS9NW1 UYoPxCthfzVSPsv3yDCfHq/MznPxUJNgzq/SobG8yszhD+GPXSQiwQ8KzCOTSFSE0c/J MzF7xMAaC343N7TorZBfyEvLcP1vpGF02pAKATcr1G8wl72KVpTtjbRG66yM8Ux20Sft D88+qK/V6imPRkPgDV0nkhjEdvnYRHKtVOrMyDP5LsKYnTittkMQpkKgOZWe2cEDzV2m CsJw== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJLgmOMo2ZaDY0ZdJJhqRH4L1DwEOduH713dttfmvHKsMzfGpEbFFjqQX3R8py63WlORj5AwMUUShO05Iw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.107.137.36 with SMTP id l36mr8095521iod.177.1459577870473; Fri, 01 Apr 2016 23:17:50 -0700 (PDT) Sender: kob6558@gmail.com Received: by 10.79.35.31 with HTTP; Fri, 1 Apr 2016 23:17:50 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <56FE58E3.2020803@toco-domains.de> References: <1459448404.36265.19.camel@mathiaspicker.net> <56FE58E3.2020803@toco-domains.de> Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2016 23:17:50 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: W6QKnmyM8Z4jfv175HESKemZj_4 Message-ID: Subject: Re: synth just deleted 290 ports on my machine on second try ;) From: Kevin Oberman To: Torsten Zuehlsdorff Cc: FreeBSD Ports ML Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.21 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Apr 2016 06:17:51 -0000 On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 4:17 AM, Torsten Zuehlsdorff < mailinglists@toco-domains.de> wrote: > On 31.03.2016 20:20, Mathias Picker wrote: > > What can I do now, other than using portmaster to rebuild all ports? >> > > You can use poudriere to rebuild all the ports and use its local > repository for pkg. > > Greetings, > Torsten But that's the whole point of synth. It exists to allow you to build packages for customized ports without the heavier weight of poudriere. -- Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer E-mail: rkoberman@gmail.com PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683 From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Apr 2 08:57:38 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C968AEBC71 for ; Sat, 2 Apr 2016 08:57:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B8D6122D for ; Sat, 2 Apr 2016 08:57:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 4AE7DAEBC6F; Sat, 2 Apr 2016 08:57:38 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A934AEBC6E for ; Sat, 2 Apr 2016 08:57:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.freebsd.org (portscout.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3EBC3122C for ; Sat, 2 Apr 2016 08:57:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.123]) by portscout.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u328vc3Z021265 for ; Sat, 2 Apr 2016 08:57:38 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id u328vcXk021264; Sat, 2 Apr 2016 08:57:38 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201604020857.u328vcXk021264@portscout.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2016 08:57:38 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Apr 2016 08:57:38 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ games/stepmania-devel | 5.0.10 | v5.0.11 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ textproc/py-html2text | 2016.1.8 | 2016.4.2 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Thanks. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Apr 2 12:42:09 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FC3BB007ED for ; Sat, 2 Apr 2016 12:42:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from trashcan@ellael.org) Received: from mx2.enfer-du-nord.net (mx2.enfer-du-nord.net [IPv6:2001:41d0:d:3049:1:1:0:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D4D771C60 for ; Sat, 2 Apr 2016 12:42:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from trashcan@ellael.org) Received: from [IPv6:2003:8c:2e62:3101:80e0:ee18:6573:abc1] (p2003008C2E62310180E0EE186573ABC1.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [IPv6:2003:8c:2e62:3101:80e0:ee18:6573:abc1]) by mx2.enfer-du-nord.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3qcdDb03ndzShW for ; Sat, 2 Apr 2016 14:42:06 +0200 (CEST) From: Michael Grimm Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: pkg-1.7.0 is an order of magnitude slower than pkg-1.6.4 Message-Id: <6DD156C6-C3E1-43BC-8EC5-1ACB16EBFC3E@ellael.org> Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2016 14:42:06 +0200 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\)) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.99.1 at mail X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Apr 2016 12:42:09 -0000 Hi =E2=80=94 This is 10.3-PRERELEASE (r297387). I did upgrade ports-mgmt/pkg today and ever since, I do observe a = significant slow-down when it comes to reinstalling ports from my = poudriere repository: 26 seconds for 74 ports within a jail and pkg-1.6.4: ---------------------------------------------------- Mar 29 18:19:56 pkg: indexinfo reinstalled: 0.2.4 = -> 0.2.4=20 =E2=80=A6 Mar 29 18:20:22 pkg: pkg reinstalled: 1.6.4_1 -> = 1.6.4_1 309 seconds for the very same 74 ports within the very same jail and = pkg-1.7.0: = --------------------------------------------------------------------------= ----- Apr 2 14:09:55 pkg: indexinfo reinstalled: 0.2.4 = -> 0.2.4 =E2=80=A6 Apr 2 14:15:04 pkg: pkg reinstalled: 1.7.0 -> = 1.7.0 This is reproducible, this is true for all my ports in all my jails and = on the host. Is this an expected slow-down? /usr/ports/UPGRADE and = https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/ports-mgmt/pkg/?view=3Dlog are not = indicating that behavior. But I might have missed something. Any feedback is highly appriciated, thanks, and regards, Michael From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Apr 2 12:48:50 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95B0BB008AE for ; Sat, 2 Apr 2016 12:48:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from baptiste.daroussin@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lf0-x22d.google.com (mail-lf0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A2041E13 for ; Sat, 2 Apr 2016 12:48:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from baptiste.daroussin@gmail.com) Received: by mail-lf0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id c62so107554936lfc.1 for ; Sat, 02 Apr 2016 05:48:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=w3NQMV1MvjVclJPPHvz5WUB1mFYYSK2i11LKE6tdpFw=; b=LxFLPAUjcQL2UxFKcnQ1KeEPsjpnQRkDB8eyA6/FN9rj2lWO19O/QlVwbbTcajffZA GZHJfEXOINuRSav/ORJQ0lSiSsmWJqhRapjaVZDyhuiuV4Nl1cgM9xSKyzM2ingu5IYT obxbWMadnRCyPEM24qcvaFW5XRJcIbbKk8YNtnZrNkCfXy5ZVVAxI1iZ4uD/Wv3debpw WqQ1QeHZvAnkMtuFaBh7MKbJbVpUdfqFZ3poH1l9NbsOaQophexcag7x65GKFAO30otA xPNqbofQZcti3A5+btJdkzNUnV2aoo1N0npS5JB8tEQxisQDp2W3O1YYLRtLNOrD/8Mq 7MEA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=w3NQMV1MvjVclJPPHvz5WUB1mFYYSK2i11LKE6tdpFw=; b=TUAChbzkNw9T2SHRVQSF2BU7jp7/wm2C/xFLkdPsd0OMGu1WJUevx7d1/NtC39O7Xh ilHN2ilNzcvkh+gAsP44Aa9LAbZo5rgVyUasV56Xrrt7b83D8EbROc55aSu9ww2Fp9DR kY/1k9Sf9KiHVa4k8qVI3wOk0V0iFBuM6xVIJtny/rMeI9INXOucYXGRWTJDbsBNO8JB m9z0uz44UE7IUEG2NpIOQHLOzBfqtP0pk3R7NXN4SEYKzVVhiWoiXATVIRWIhYR4y4SX IwM+QxI2Fnmh0rDtbxCJ8ulJST7HJHYQxG/kSD6/zMfaofjIwwGqNYVkpaAkzFgu5Vy6 ZUFw== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJJ2rks89o0+fhKRQknhXBZ22zqYZ21PeFCOoph4rfbYf80FbPVocufx9fsnwNoJBg== X-Received: by 10.194.90.3 with SMTP id bs3mr6308721wjb.105.1459601328344; Sat, 02 Apr 2016 05:48:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ivaldir.etoilebsd.net ([2001:41d0:8:db4c::1]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i5sm18863933wjx.15.2016.04.02.05.48.46 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 02 Apr 2016 05:48:47 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Baptiste Daroussin Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2016 14:48:45 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: Michael Grimm Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pkg-1.7.0 is an order of magnitude slower than pkg-1.6.4 Message-ID: <20160402124845.GM1128@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> References: <6DD156C6-C3E1-43BC-8EC5-1ACB16EBFC3E@ellael.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="hnsKUeImFCk/igEn" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6DD156C6-C3E1-43BC-8EC5-1ACB16EBFC3E@ellael.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Apr 2016 12:48:50 -0000 --hnsKUeImFCk/igEn Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Apr 02, 2016 at 02:42:06PM +0200, Michael Grimm wrote: > Hi =E2=80=94 >=20 > This is 10.3-PRERELEASE (r297387). >=20 > I did upgrade ports-mgmt/pkg today and ever since, I do observe a signifi= cant slow-down when it comes to reinstalling ports from my poudriere reposi= tory: >=20 > 26 seconds for 74 ports within a jail and pkg-1.6.4: > ---------------------------------------------------- > Mar 29 18:19:56 pkg: indexinfo reinstalled: 0.2.4 -> 0.2.4= =20 > =E2=80=A6 > Mar 29 18:20:22 pkg: pkg reinstalled: 1.6.4_1 -> 1.6.4_1 >=20 >=20 > 309 seconds for the very same 74 ports within the very same jail and pkg-= 1.7.0: > -------------------------------------------------------------------------= ------ > Apr 2 14:09:55 pkg: indexinfo reinstalled: 0.2.4 -> 0.2.4 > =E2=80=A6 > Apr 2 14:15:04 pkg: pkg reinstalled: 1.7.0 -> 1.7.0 >=20 > This is reproducible, this is true for all my ports in all my jails and o= n the host. >=20 > Is this an expected slow-down? /usr/ports/UPGRADE and https://svnweb.free= bsd.org/ports/head/ports-mgmt/pkg/?view=3Dlog are not indicating that behav= ior. > But I might have missed something. >=20 > Any feedback is highly appriciated, thanks, and regards, pkg 1.7 is IO intensive that may explain. I plan to readd some improvements on this side before 1.8 Best regards, Bapt --hnsKUeImFCk/igEn Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJW/7+tAAoJEGOJi9zxtz5abS4P/jq5uR+K4vOA5BqEvf7TQzDK 4AuUezAl06LL9zbtv22rg3mIWGMdDaAM9AxIIFdrfZohZLwWX6PZ7On5Vzydc80I ymLdrw1QQAnMPnB1oyslEnO1zwvMrUe8dIn4mmFjFS/i/7i9l62pwHK2CM1UfdSo oILjStPoSFz9w2gtM/fiUOLeSQ1txy6w06RDJv/cTGOTDE7YtFf5hpgHa8CwU9Iz Lx6k8yj9k6tI0q+GcwAIcTrf55lGXR4mCTUR2te7tZh7vdaHWkRkFgwJ29DVc7jo rB8SzN1HusTo9+CU4jGjAz8A3pl9x4NZnt3boDq19Mwmprsn3WRMoJ8T3PbZNco5 MSVQVMHOBdINNObP0H3bBV7gZpMn1C/Zn5KkQISB3R8mdCYJK6R1DFAxVwqR4G3a 14oFgjJ/7wOI/GG3PwEfvPqht5YY7iqghAl9KNQ334ufTUMqysA1U1DwxXjtWktT DSwhX09aZmVJLLHzOLKyZZ55kM7bN1GPdwSCfuG//A0eSNnGgNMk2Fy6vInXGHBK VuPEkoTl1147wLT3Iwt2h1rbBLaT+tis/bIBI0JejIQ/LQYIeyaxhYH/CHxmPdej 0YW6F2f7yhcicgaw2sDVFQlme8KIknzAud4en3M9XapNiErY4B1WtNjqnd5BqOLN DRV1J9uBDZ6ERuEAGzDe =2hPv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --hnsKUeImFCk/igEn-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Apr 2 12:59:18 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 050F6B00BB5 for ; Sat, 2 Apr 2016 12:59:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from trashcan@ellael.org) Received: from mx1.enfer-du-nord.net (mx1.enfer-du-nord.net [IPv6:2001:41d0:1008:bcb:1:1:0:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7214813DE; Sat, 2 Apr 2016 12:59:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from trashcan@ellael.org) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\)) Subject: Re: pkg-1.7.0 is an order of magnitude slower than pkg-1.6.4 From: Michael Grimm In-Reply-To: <20160402124845.GM1128@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2016 14:59:06 +0200 Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <05DDCF70-8865-4F1F-A264-3000B8EF5244@ellael.org> References: <6DD156C6-C3E1-43BC-8EC5-1ACB16EBFC3E@ellael.org> <20160402124845.GM1128@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> To: Baptiste Daroussin X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.99.1 at mail X-Virus-Status: Clean X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Apr 2016 12:59:18 -0000 Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >=20 > On Sat, Apr 02, 2016 at 02:42:06PM +0200, Michael Grimm wrote: >> 26 seconds for 74 ports within a jail and pkg-1.6.4: [=E2=80=A6] >> 309 seconds for the very same 74 ports within the very same jail and = pkg-1.7.0: [=E2=80=A6] >> Is this an expected slow-down? /usr/ports/UPGRADE and = https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/ports-mgmt/pkg/?view=3Dlog are not = indicating that behavior. >> But I might have missed something. >>=20 >> Any feedback is highly appriciated, thanks, and regards, >=20 > pkg 1.7 is IO intensive that may explain. Ok, understood. JFTR: perl (24s), python27 (44s), and ruby (125s) take the longest time = to reinstall. > I plan to readd some improvements on this side before 1.8 Good to know, thanks for your feedback. Regards, Michael From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Apr 2 13:00:52 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 914AFB00C3D for ; Sat, 2 Apr 2016 13:00:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from baptiste.daroussin@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lf0-x230.google.com (mail-lf0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F2061529 for ; Sat, 2 Apr 2016 13:00:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from baptiste.daroussin@gmail.com) Received: by mail-lf0-x230.google.com with SMTP id p188so80615846lfd.0 for ; Sat, 02 Apr 2016 06:00:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=a51ki1x4y1uuBBHxyuE7S051/k1Xf5HpOW7x2+uoLOk=; b=vioRT8EXl+7YepgpAssaKUIE4vgwgTT1TA/2kJnTCT2CLS5hMo8reYPjYXepoFMvJp UR7blrniB9aImA71wHmXzjiIU807mqkHGpnaUfTZWFEy/jLh6aiWm5WCTb/DbP6Dvuk4 R2C5WSzp47UooRXyCBv0so06+TXEqra74oRe0od2BvbRFn04sFB4Ods4L7fqpsHdrM5H M4HZHwvGW/H3AOHFjcUdVj4H3mpo9Wm2ZSCsVP7bR6BAjNGe9PzOiWXj+5/FMLpcueTC 4m7vRpSPu2I+2Uk+I01MdwHnPUbWg5cjfq+4MzaWFXPi06WF6WtSiC/e7HEHN/ky0RBB JgyQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=a51ki1x4y1uuBBHxyuE7S051/k1Xf5HpOW7x2+uoLOk=; b=gy2qRW5B7c9TiHFOqS10H5KWTpsmQQdXJW9g2b4L7TsjCzZAGColzojsl5ieeELDfy eziNMyNNXPNPY63IiryDNd9L7tsbfBWiXZK3JiEYUUp89BJ/yB3kWhpWGroNvvg9mI5M ye6bGIMEmbsgW7DEs97zS8pZXOnZYcODAV3vuky1DAPi48aw23yKaGdZrSNCIIe4NmKE xO1zP0EFjj3mCI/iAY7uh2USkPyiechtoE3z9qC8mNjx5byftNFyer5EEMS9LiEtUxM8 XStxP69kp870nT0k13TjuEhaNFbNFrovB7gNbtl8qzds7EZ5ECvg4t55iR0vEYYJUEBk DRbw== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJIeXhUhqKjqgjnWH4WdkJeTB0HRs2tlj/yPvjaDGozKrmSlZ8By2wtWcsx0pewkMA== X-Received: by 10.194.71.226 with SMTP id y2mr10145497wju.127.1459602050379; Sat, 02 Apr 2016 06:00:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ivaldir.etoilebsd.net ([2001:41d0:8:db4c::1]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id js8sm18762644wjc.37.2016.04.02.06.00.49 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 02 Apr 2016 06:00:49 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Baptiste Daroussin Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2016 15:00:47 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: Michael Grimm Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pkg-1.7.0 is an order of magnitude slower than pkg-1.6.4 Message-ID: <20160402130047.GN1128@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> References: <6DD156C6-C3E1-43BC-8EC5-1ACB16EBFC3E@ellael.org> <20160402124845.GM1128@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <05DDCF70-8865-4F1F-A264-3000B8EF5244@ellael.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Zl+NncWK+U5aSfTo" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <05DDCF70-8865-4F1F-A264-3000B8EF5244@ellael.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Apr 2016 13:00:52 -0000 --Zl+NncWK+U5aSfTo Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Apr 02, 2016 at 02:59:06PM +0200, Michael Grimm wrote: > Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > >=20 > > On Sat, Apr 02, 2016 at 02:42:06PM +0200, Michael Grimm wrote: >=20 > >> 26 seconds for 74 ports within a jail and pkg-1.6.4: > [=E2=80=A6] > >> 309 seconds for the very same 74 ports within the very same jail and p= kg-1.7.0: > [=E2=80=A6] > >> Is this an expected slow-down? /usr/ports/UPGRADE and https://svnweb.f= reebsd.org/ports/head/ports-mgmt/pkg/?view=3Dlog are not indicating that be= havior. > >> But I might have missed something. > >>=20 > >> Any feedback is highly appriciated, thanks, and regards, > >=20 > > pkg 1.7 is IO intensive that may explain. >=20 > Ok, understood. >=20 > JFTR: perl (24s), python27 (44s), and ruby (125s) take the longest time t= o reinstall. >=20 > > I plan to readd some improvements on this side before 1.8 >=20 > Good to know, thanks for your feedback. >=20 Thank you very very much for yours! very much appreciated, it helps improvi= ng things! Best regards, Bapt --Zl+NncWK+U5aSfTo Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJW/8J/AAoJEGOJi9zxtz5aICcP/RDwP6FDOd/zp+3TtOBCOM36 wY8fvFDrhMxGoWckfy5qlPHdqMqw+3Mh/MNCMsk06dEbBX+Myz1enDopXlTl9ys4 rWmDpLVHrikTWPcmIcRZ8exxfYRcH+LwlOmSb53D4B6jc3xPgbj6MGQ7JSNvPeAI M3rAl7o1OgK2TkP7sOaJ5Ux3/m2mnga6LeRHGiIUu2GLOtGYoMIkx6sb2yCbVeiW zxjUBaay1tVWXqvjuVnzDiycmoxrgFt2Ax2WymvlqJ7E8mLJzzGEuDN4oVfzfwEd ihkFB2SCu5lQmkYvi3f29vMm4TpPGRWc4VFxL2DwtHeF4qfwd5bnsczLx9jWFM1P uagfv+fiNX2zWFxeNEF6uiHRstcYk269UblrFJaH7Wg6f4ht2yEfi7Cfry5/MpWs 3PKUwnrwnVy71vMxd7RYTwJEFnMwvkGb6HQPOqnEcnwsjP7uLkHHWKyXsGf4zWi3 sMolpljtwjLUU9sfLxXBiSbWKls2FgNBt3imDmkYglUYzakx7nuIe4bWOtMhgl8p CqQ8sSekNYAPWmQ12HBWlIFBpOOk38hjsC/L0IN7Pb89ENyQ4bnIXZkEc5LT002U 2hp/Y19h9CkPvcCZbJQsLUOEatqQNbaWZeh8bAyShYT1YcPIflLh9fwps6i4tdK7 GMq91ju05IX8Y+yWpTpX =H1Jt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Zl+NncWK+U5aSfTo-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Apr 2 13:36:03 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0401CAEC640 for ; Sat, 2 Apr 2016 13:36:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jeffreybouquet@yahoo.com) Received: from nm43-vm5.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com (nm43-vm5.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com [216.109.114.236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B343613DC for ; Sat, 2 Apr 2016 13:36:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jeffreybouquet@yahoo.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1459603957; bh=A9OPyVjKHXrOknThqt0pnkTRIYTkntz0hr9aOsAvPFI=; h=To:From:Subject:Date:From:Subject; b=a4QUw04s761Ws6KgA5vpsScV6xkCvw2B5zGG7CJp+vUIrhpLKQUo3+aPzaJGm9IBU1y6CVE8/UAoghwNAoWLVflJeXzERS7rad/nNSGXn0XKXAau6zLFQLVcJpwe+yMBfHGGy1wG3cNoleyLknJ58F2hyl7kgbPgQHLcf+B1uiIDG/l5/q7JYjhmZ4lsENS0jj0Y96awtTOwGkHc8Rr3h/3G5eiKKps9ev9W7Tg5i4DIL8hksU6C9ayoG0q4jx5hwzcABr0fGH1/8QCCfMSFWlie6UtoYNgk27YLi6WdK2Q9aOVcZmvhaJkxiBiivQ8W/55Zv8b8+6dFFQxtRaVHOg== Received: from [98.139.170.179] by nm43.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 02 Apr 2016 13:32:37 -0000 Received: from [98.139.211.205] by tm22.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 02 Apr 2016 13:32:37 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp214.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 02 Apr 2016 13:32:37 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 573730.75230.bm@smtp214.mail.bf1.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: ym7E6PQVM1kXoSzRHQaZxrEphLVI1VOxEv14jUwv77QEaT_ TcA1U2b3n6hdNDhL5cg6YWXw1gL7VRWoMGPXFR_9AcpdcScLgCVGIxb_gmO0 kFTaV1llDqgo34R6deHXjPlFGg2fw0IMup5ZGMmkeiqFBD48XOIZaFZMxBlZ i7IarS5S6shlcJ_v4j7s2Hza6iLQ6y7m95REAHSLsVAuCHj3z113foaUr_1m JKVmejfF.m0yWWz1dVhHUGwIrK1yNubU8i2xF68Q1j9yWmflRHATcZzxSzcW 0c3apl6VilOaohmzCIf_WHwvnyNHZaiyKbCZ2B.GXkVObAbYgpv.yJgrFByb Hio3Xnc7eiYnoSyIb3SUEUrr0e4g54yNDImr488HoGCvf0Hc9WFmL0RR8.mW alXv8ubNDlDLOXhoGqshXr7d4XWkRmVE9F15cAhKPrtv2rdtl6cX8elkyqiQ JTMRafXL0tsJ6KtO7U5dK2gz2kxeMTL_UuS1d3JL7_xdLcGt6aPSmN2W9WDO pJ9D2qOdIt8i.00.VhAqUlRFD5fN3x4h1w58- X-Yahoo-SMTP: 6IZaPQyswBAeyzp3urHRlQfBxGxx4Js3YAIn To: FreeBSD Mailing List From: Jeffrey Bouquet Subject: Need an expect script or p5-*Expect* to lessen keystrokes upon large ports tree changes Message-ID: <56FFC9F4.3060102@yahoo.com> Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2016 06:32:36 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Apr 2016 13:36:03 -0000 Today svn-of-ports has about 600 (tc,mc) /200 (r) = 800 responses required (tree and etc conflicts) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1... Select: (mc) prepare for updating moved-away children, if any (recommended), (p) postone, (q) quit resolution, (h) help: [ I need expect to return mc, and a RET ] IF expect works upon svn responses 2... Select: (p) (df) (e) (m) (mc) (tc) (s) [ I need expect to return tc , and a RET] Sorry for the omitted svn context 3... Select: (r) (p) (q) (h) [ sorry for the omitted svn context] [I need expect to return r , and a RET ] --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Writing this request about 100/800 done for today, so cannot help this time, not urgent -- better yet if it was integrated into svn as a feature... Seems that, once-a-year or so, it is way too time consuming all of a sudden, and sometimes exceedingly inconvenient -- so it would be nice to have a backup plan. I will provide context in a followup, after a few days, if that is necc. for some expert or semi-expert in expect to craft a script. Thanks in advance, or any other ideas appreciated. Not wanting to waste anyone's time. Jeff From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Apr 2 16:45:24 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E48DB003D6 for ; Sat, 2 Apr 2016 16:45:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from citapm.icyb.net.ua (citapm.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 750B31A90 for ; Sat, 2 Apr 2016 16:45:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from porto.starpoint.kiev.ua (porto-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.100]) by citapm.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id TAA11927; Sat, 02 Apr 2016 19:45:15 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by porto.starpoint.kiev.ua with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD)) id 1amOfj-0004WK-06; Sat, 02 Apr 2016 19:45:15 +0300 To: =?UTF-8?Q?Micka=c3=abl_Maillot?= Cc: ports From: Andriy Gapon Subject: kodi vs samba Message-ID: <56FFF6E2.6080006@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2016 19:44:18 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Apr 2016 16:45:24 -0000 MickaĆ«l, could you please change kodi's samba dependency from samba-nmblookup to samba36? The difference between those packages is not that big size-wise, but the current dependency is a headache for those who want to use both kodi and samba on the same machine. -- Andriy Gapon From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Apr 2 19:21:04 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7810AECD9C for ; Sat, 2 Apr 2016 19:21:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ig0-x236.google.com (mail-ig0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8186C1BA3 for ; Sat, 2 Apr 2016 19:21:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: by mail-ig0-x236.google.com with SMTP id sy18so35173886igc.1 for ; Sat, 02 Apr 2016 12:21:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc; bh=Utpe1XFEicjZZynR6UjWEY23ZtVrHC5WcoALp8/ek9k=; b=rcZm9xX4lhXQxHQ3bzyPTlkqZEDmFRyl1Me7VVUAsDpmqJtoh4qz3DvQFiSoRho6lr ySNTgmFhsBctcX+9/1aZNC3THuLKnq0uxgoKt/DU/2Ni0uKqDmWGXnhW1DVq4PDqnPzF VfnUdnNgxqBJo9eyE6oObDGWoKKdkegmxRKP0Hwc8eZ7gBZV422737ekDLrxCY8gBVAV XI3xBUa7fYve4feEIShcHYko+dXv8/kbzzNk5kkGPHdYACInS3qrihm16J5lQUIC5tm0 ZDtJ/wFzwQnXYYNbUZyYU/7Ss8+yzQSwN2AaCKkTzLRtwEdxr+3np4aAEYoHAnlyOdwk 4zrw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=Utpe1XFEicjZZynR6UjWEY23ZtVrHC5WcoALp8/ek9k=; b=lrxF4wM1z1qH3OHeiGFZEnVmee2GqmMesXJ0oTLMZTeyA6Yl6ApOQOfG+LITMofA7C 8u58z/QpQwfP/u36AP4K3RPuodVRwvsGOwXlJNu7ixNf/A8N8Bk+xciC0FyAXGZNxMn+ VdbNd/rydHZsdomDZetUzxBobYcaHugyPhnV5uxJq5xNRLXIzpFu7TAhQ6lvb+3OBM2t Zxq2JvUMoCLBF+8n5otsh7s/lndRnQZu6JdzZ0wflXyWspDKJ+gKXyfij9cu0dK4K/Ry Im0dsvt1x1+eOGRmXyU5w8FV5l0hM4KRZ14zuMEAhn0NBVzfL3qxF0OFoDmsyRNx+hgg 9tTw== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJLCIFvGvPvyw2mGPc7t369r+9E5Z50SZvIbWBPstGEjB0YP+N36mJHnq1VrUgF1N10F3yWegIBkZDMXCA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.8.101 with SMTP id q5mr4026110iga.22.1459624863594; Sat, 02 Apr 2016 12:21:03 -0700 (PDT) Sender: kob6558@gmail.com Received: by 10.79.35.33 with HTTP; Sat, 2 Apr 2016 12:21:03 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <56FFC9F4.3060102@yahoo.com> References: <56FFC9F4.3060102@yahoo.com> Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2016 12:21:03 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: oBCmAndw0-X66Q-HOlfYNRj8SRs Message-ID: Subject: Re: Need an expect script or p5-*Expect* to lessen keystrokes upon large ports tree changes From: Kevin Oberman To: Jeffrey Bouquet Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.21 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Apr 2016 19:21:04 -0000 On Sat, Apr 2, 2016 at 6:32 AM, Jeffrey Bouquet via freebsd-ports < freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> wrote: > Today svn-of-ports has about 600 (tc,mc) /200 (r) = 800 responses > required (tree and etc conflicts) > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > 1... > > Select: > (mc) prepare for updating moved-away children, if any (recommended), > (p) postone, (q) quit resolution, (h) help: > > [ I need expect to return mc, and a RET ] IF expect works upon svn > responses > > 2... > > Select: > (p) (df) (e) (m) > (mc) (tc) > (s) > > [ I need expect to return tc , and a RET] Sorry for the omitted svn > context > > 3... > > Select: > (r) (p) (q) (h) [ sorry for the omitted svn > context] > > [I need expect to return r , and a RET ] > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Writing this request about 100/800 done for today, so cannot help this > time, not > urgent -- better yet if it was integrated into svn as a feature... > > Seems that, once-a-year or so, it is way too time consuming all of a > sudden, and sometimes > exceedingly inconvenient -- so it would be nice to have a backup plan. > > I will provide context in a followup, after a few days, if that is necc. > for some expert or > semi-expert in expect to craft a script. > > Thanks in advance, or any other ideas appreciated. Not wanting to waste > anyone's time. > > Jeff > I am not volunteering to write an expect script for you though it could be done with either expect or p5-Expect-Simple. Expect scripts, if reliable, are very difficult to write and mistakes can, in many cases, be disastrous. I had to write and support scripts to talk to network routers and switches and I can't recommend it. There is always some possible response that you either didn't know about or thought you would never receive that blows things out of the water. And screen scraping is always risky as a minor change between versions can break everything. I am concerned with why this is happening. I have run "svn up /user/ports" nightly for years with no issues like you describe. This simply should not be happening. I'm curious as to why. Are you running svn in a script or manually? What command are you using? What version of subversion is installed or are you running the base svnlite? (I use the full-blown subversion.) Are you manually doing any edits to the ports tree? Have you looked at the output of "svn status /usr/ports"? -- Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer E-mail: rkoberman@gmail.com PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683 From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Apr 2 19:27:25 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18D3BAECEF5 for ; Sat, 2 Apr 2016 19:27:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from baptiste.daroussin@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lb0-x242.google.com (mail-lb0-x242.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::242]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8FCC71E49 for ; Sat, 2 Apr 2016 19:27:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from baptiste.daroussin@gmail.com) Received: by mail-lb0-x242.google.com with SMTP id q4so14308500lbq.3 for ; Sat, 02 Apr 2016 12:27:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=ibrzy9uqVIDNcNcjcpSvZg9rzoYt7g/FadBqpxTzx3M=; b=GtC2CfBD5KlxmSTiCCM6eDctzVGhKBpu6JlZ6b9uP3QvkFF3fVRP93cDx85OPDDslf EsxvqbY22A0+sCTKSCp8pyACpdIPaZKDW5SkNrpH1v4HJmioWz3zx/LdHZXjw+piQUlk KCEKpdA1sUflV5Q8ANxVE58uF44hjeiQddnoWbLTENbJM8eXwd8ex3B54VgrAG6D2qds Y6uqTbYgNOVryOxvnZSEj/oFmsZZWa0TWVPfnO46RBWC9djikVgZC0BltIOiyrbW2F/m TMgLMCsH3fkY8lZIEBOdOu5iRaBCVXDJCvga5r5+9dm3PH9TGyHtzykhfT+/D1C2tic8 bRMg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=ibrzy9uqVIDNcNcjcpSvZg9rzoYt7g/FadBqpxTzx3M=; b=Qv3g5isYEYe/Er5gdKyuWSNg9e5wQhiEXxbgUr18HLakgdqkKzZAKKfYaChEwVgYkN Bn6vWPk28f8qfsqLLf/Ke80UUe+25KZ/D9qb5/TWb/u4/h4qVdJ2ZxG7OoyV44gie6Td GP65CphbF8n+8g/73LI7MJVoIcdAKAUsWKqmh77mSL69Q7U39A6xOR9HOSLpVIlU4t2l dSZr0V1JGTD9OxinAgbg9DeEpoMYa7P3iE27DTQsVlf2sdwVzf0Ihh5OSSudr7/6AfcY 9uB86+fsNoZvvW3zHrqHHwR/UMqJoQXPduImeoa4k4Z4dBFbzS5CnCedsHGtJmINKDTK tY/g== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJJu6e/ZUs3l1KRiNJZBRlftEjh4iKlcYpf9j7kzsEl0Uxjb870FJQf7+8NoLuXjHQ== X-Received: by 10.28.226.212 with SMTP id z203mr4544062wmg.9.1459625242838; Sat, 02 Apr 2016 12:27:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ivaldir.etoilebsd.net ([2001:41d0:8:db4c::1]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ll9sm20247069wjc.29.2016.04.02.12.27.21 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 02 Apr 2016 12:27:22 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Baptiste Daroussin Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2016 21:27:20 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: Kevin Oberman Cc: Jeffrey Bouquet , FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: Need an expect script or p5-*Expect* to lessen keystrokes upon large ports tree changes Message-ID: <20160402192720.GD5214@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> References: <56FFC9F4.3060102@yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="lc9FT7cWel8HagAv" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Apr 2016 19:27:25 -0000 --lc9FT7cWel8HagAv Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Apr 02, 2016 at 12:21:03PM -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote: > On Sat, Apr 2, 2016 at 6:32 AM, Jeffrey Bouquet via freebsd-ports < > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> wrote: >=20 > > Today svn-of-ports has about 600 (tc,mc) /200 (r) =3D 800 responses > > required (tree and etc conflicts) > > > > > > -----------------------------------------------------------------------= --------------------- > > > > 1... > > > > Select: > > (mc) prepare for updating moved-away children, if any (recommended), > > (p) postone, (q) quit resolution, (h) help: > > > > [ I need expect to return mc, and a RET ] IF expect works upon svn > > responses > > > > 2... > > > > Select: > > (p) (df) (e) (m) > > (mc) (tc) > > (s) > > > > [ I need expect to return tc , and a RET] Sorry for the omitted svn > > context > > > > 3... > > > > Select: > > (r) (p) (q) (h) [ sorry for the omitted svn > > context] > > > > [I need expect to return r , and a RET ] > > > > > > > > > > -----------------------------------------------------------------------= ---------------------------------------------------------- > > > > Writing this request about 100/800 done for today, so cannot help this > > time, not > > urgent -- better yet if it was integrated into svn as a feature... > > > > Seems that, once-a-year or so, it is way too time consuming all of a > > sudden, and sometimes > > exceedingly inconvenient -- so it would be nice to have a backup plan. > > > > I will provide context in a followup, after a few days, if that is necc. > > for some expert or > > semi-expert in expect to craft a script. > > > > Thanks in advance, or any other ideas appreciated. Not wanting to waste > > anyone's time. > > > > Jeff > > >=20 > I am not volunteering to write an expect script for you though it could be > done with either expect or p5-Expect-Simple. Expect scripts, if reliable, > are very difficult to write and mistakes can, in many cases, be disastrou= s. > I had to write and support scripts to talk to network routers and switches > and I can't recommend it. There is always some possible response that you > either didn't know about or thought you would never receive that blows > things out of the water. And screen scraping is always risky as a minor > change between versions can break everything. >=20 > I am concerned with why this is happening. I have run "svn up /user/ports" > nightly for years with no issues like you describe. This simply should not > be happening. I'm curious as to why. >=20 > Are you running svn in a script or manually? What command are you using? > What version of subversion is installed or are you running the base > svnlite? (I use the full-blown subversion.) > Are you manually doing any edits to the ports tree? > Have you looked at the output of "svn status /usr/ports"? svn update --accept tc should do the trick, no need for an expect script Best regards, Bapt --lc9FT7cWel8HagAv Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJXAB0YAAoJEGOJi9zxtz5a9IQP/imot3ReKnSVkrDuuovI+M0k pp6iMsnOp8usgnYT3OazLCnjum0xSPMjFYxH1cuQed16PvZ2PTGVftY5QgwbDhVx Iuvf/5C+TkFjZ2U2SqplVNB6l3C/dEEENUy3wZmD4MinbqNNdt8d2Q8bbZwMAxqY NJ/QH8Zf/ihuSd+bUaBIyDrbH17XKGBkCEnCSn/S6dVB2enkyN7JQNv2jOlMUkzB +gav7lu4/BcdgEP1/W2PwwDuuNXeRbJbKqLisIwFcnWu9bO5/NvMWME4q2polPNF qwLmGz+SE+G33CQcO2NSOujwA/VZrNfO1LDFuNimWTbKUYPhYGdKx6fjhBjsZJ1G QiSAdsJVZdQ7qJAbs6S5uZ/joEfIUwhLJtyMISwUYVgPz9DZQKN2mxeuxlTj1gTB a5Q644t4ihEH6U7WhQhnp6nYMX68hSRbqSlx/B9i9lfqT8IRVckyZcG1OZ8c90ut 0GBO5cm9dvCnrykTAq+2dzQGhr5uakudoEDe7zTO3NWcs7TSBd4PEsDj2se0BYPB sUgZCml3aY6jYQAaO4ROqfpPd63DSSDclKKSWl2UOIwBoVbEbJ73Om/sVwtxL6PM aEpoQBIx6xboVMaA3RffTQsqMnPAsFwiS/PtMl1g4uUSiQd6Resr1LFqt30H5Mio KOZMgNagJipLVKEeYCu8 =+tZZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --lc9FT7cWel8HagAv--