From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun Jul 31 00:31:05 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF0F0BA2643 for ; Sun, 31 Jul 2016 00:31:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounces+3237981-d48e-freebsd-questions=freebsd.org@sg.buckget.com) Received: from o1.sg.buckget.com (o1.sg.buckget.com [167.89.52.33]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB3B0189A for ; Sun, 31 Jul 2016 00:31:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounces+3237981-d48e-freebsd-questions=freebsd.org@sg.buckget.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=buckget.com; h=content-type:from:mime-version:subject:to; s=s1; bh=UmfEfjFj6ows744UcCbd0umX8Q8=; b=hUZM1SKND1EOvmrkV5HP2JVllkNh5 Kmdec8Qn7QV9hy+uurUqX+omk+nh8EeIwBHgyFcP6NT7wXeMI5WtUNeVxs1HG3j+ VguBd2K9zM17G0eohMCD2u3cT+JvSvlZBWKbfPJFBfS5WtTpKH8Vv+g1kOa4PhqI 3EoabcLvsBFvbk= Received: by filter0210p1las1.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter0210p1las1.9396.579D46C9C 2016-07-31 00:31:05.236641906 +0000 UTC Received: from MzIzNzk4MQ (p3nlhg761.shr.prod.phx3.secureserver.net [184.168.46.161]) by ismtpd0015p1las1.sendgrid.net (SG) with HTTP id cEb2wdJ4RheZm4Z9iJzJDQ for ; Sun, 31 Jul 2016 00:31:05.188 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2016 00:31:05 +0000 From: "Twitter Connector" Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Twitter Connector To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: X-SG-EID: FFnPVu6lb0A5TuepcCdqxLOfczNEIxluOZzq9GOc07rs0Qj+Iqcl3EmdNOX0M3iah/snVnhWa+MWT0 1a8lmc72bjfLRbZ/O6E8R5VlDJWePOS1aS0fwoDQhkHBpcZU2KRpqWtxQxXMP8W1gxbU4GBFtvluAT cQ7jxoKQPufx8FIJIISY0i2sKhvVgDlwT7TlJ+WGXceezrrXeC/1AuCOMbDsu/Vr2uHbY/Onmt1/Yl ljrdVO/0QvcxCrWaeoIEqA X-SG-ID: 8jXKzZkZOLw8fDcfQreIJqrM1Y7jV9V6APmE/W7b4l8LQdN1CsYcxNV15PWnDqpz Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2016 00:31:06 -0000 BuckGet.com =09=09 =09
Twitter Connector

Click here to connect with Twitter

BuckGet.com | Manage Subscriptions
= From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun Jul 31 09:39:00 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 104A7BA924C for ; Sun, 31 Jul 2016 09:39:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alnis.m@mail.com) Received: from mout.gmx.com (mout.gmx.com [74.208.4.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C579B1AF0 for ; Sun, 31 Jul 2016 09:38:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alnis.m@mail.com) Received: from [192.168.0.192] ([78.84.255.253]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmxus001) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MIMED-1bQljY2t15-004BSh for ; Sun, 31 Jul 2016 11:38:52 +0200 From: Alnis Morics Subject: pkg-add for installing into a jail? To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <1997dd6e-1abd-4d4f-e95b-0f4679543a16@mail.com> Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2016 12:38:49 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/45.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:ANKy3bDz9iLlH5ef/sruJek+btp9r0e77swgSQTrj1nBhayfS1X 24MSJT3nnmafh25n8p8SV/R8jJwQdTlYczC+ofgVRg9DlGCwxXkLaHnQ/hDhjSgu73a+8oM 1K9SbaBl/7kXAxI1cp0TQ1csjNYMyoMrPflIu4Ru4BQWBxF0Jvjw21L7Z6+kKDmwzVptIgi lnLiFx6b7xhCrEW0Rmsvw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:0938JtoEfN8=:N3nBq2zI61AwqeXWZh/JoF Hl1sZI2vHm8/MFNsnINkmeRm0BNzyML3v6nkMaEJksBQI60kv1kR1AnOkxoEW2TxvMn3FLhJk /ZqG7ibA32hqKFxloYwdT8OAiolmBVxpsGNdurWLBUtULEEDPFbH6Q5uEzzjppMPrJqCR0r4Y sQLrUkYUBuwm1uxTTj8Q1Q+QlIAjvXYVGsdFl8mET+Znbw8qvFsIIFKCD+0hGlf5fHeBlH/yA YQIksvKFj6ZW2OLWbAcazO1kssq8diBDl9Yq/fbOgRzUDYfFSEsw24bEp4WYxHoZJZjC0CQEI dmuN+DbJcp0TYKLmtBbacRsUkvN8K0CrKS2R/O82ocLMFKVgplv2nXaZF8UNPpOEm/5OU2o/K rNNwQPo3mXANVcLVEcnOTR5CddeKsrftGWRqhugKtH7KnMfuzBlYu6MqaCk07RJdr2nH6b2JG RXQ9uFb5Q0lxqaCBi9P5zpeZOMYH8WMp88bQGcDWrIlh2HKUBb3146ubLgEYgkTUlLGIXE7Yo PkCyNI4SRSuADb0jG4Wc5U0IrWE4YrgqWoZwoqwuU4xpu8AT5LQfK6KNbE3T88jlKjUF89WoZ QGvLGe7jXAcrf44V8wYhWp9WHtwjzSRr9BXExIHZSYk0c6zojgdS4VWbwVb4yrHEEK6XvoQkf WEqr9EeKJJ7yCZKbbKNKquUAkN9VNio6dBIA/BrFUpe3CKFM+tkxOMTRxwnrvG7QykPdD4uJ2 Lzha3dFfzgm9bqgLtFggjPVnpdgH/eWCi3j8OuEh0TK/7XaNEoMe8IIxBKWD3wWs7O3RIrmoI ja5N27B X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2016 09:39:00 -0000 Hi, I could successfully use "pkg -j 1 " many times to install packages onto a jail. But now I had to change an option in a port, so I built a package myself: portmaster -g www/apache22 The package and its dependency was stored to /usr/ports/packages/All (as I set it in $PACKAGES): apache22-2.2.31_1.txz apr-1.5.2.1.5.4.txz I can now install these packages using pkg-add on the host, but not onto the jail: test:/usr/ports/packages/All# pkg -j 1 add apache22-2.2.31_1.txz apr-1.5.2.1.5.4.txz pkg: apache22-2.2.31_1.txz: No such file or directory pkg: Was 'pkg install apache22-2.2.31_1.txz' meant? pkg: apr-1.5.2.1.5.4.txz: No such file or directory pkg: Was 'pkg install apr-1.5.2.1.5.4.txz' meant? Failed to install the following 2 package(s): apache22-2.2.31_1.txz, apr-1.5.2.1.5.4.txz If there is "No such file or directory", where does pkg look for them? (I also tried to use full path; the result is the same) Or is pkg-add an exception which doesn't work with -j option? -Alnis From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun Jul 31 21:08:15 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C68C9BA8F04 for ; Sun, 31 Jul 2016 21:08:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from doug@fledge.watson.org) Received: from cyrus.watson.org (cyrus.watson.org [198.74.231.69]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A62E711D0 for ; Sun, 31 Jul 2016 21:08:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from doug@fledge.watson.org) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [198.74.231.63]) by cyrus.watson.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A15A146B3C; Sun, 31 Jul 2016 17:08:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: from fledge.watson.org (doug@localhost.watson.org [127.0.0.1]) by fledge.watson.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u6VL8ECN095522; Sun, 31 Jul 2016 17:08:14 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from doug@fledge.watson.org) Received: from localhost (doug@localhost) by fledge.watson.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) with ESMTP id u6VL8Egk095519; Sun, 31 Jul 2016 17:08:14 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from doug@fledge.watson.org) Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2016 17:08:14 -0400 (EDT) From: doug Reply-To: doug@safeport.com To: Alnis Morics cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pkg-add for installing into a jail? In-Reply-To: <1997dd6e-1abd-4d4f-e95b-0f4679543a16@mail.com> Message-ID: References: <1997dd6e-1abd-4d4f-e95b-0f4679543a16@mail.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (BSF 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (fledge.watson.org [127.0.0.1]); Sun, 31 Jul 2016 17:08:14 -0400 (EDT) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2016 21:08:15 -0000 On Sun, 31 Jul 2016, Alnis Morics wrote: > Hi, > > I could successfully use "pkg -j 1 " many times to install > packages onto a jail. > > But now I had to change an option in a port, so I built a package myself: > > portmaster -g www/apache22 > > The package and its dependency was stored to /usr/ports/packages/All (as I > set it in $PACKAGES): > > apache22-2.2.31_1.txz apr-1.5.2.1.5.4.txz > > I can now install these packages using pkg-add on the host, but not onto the > jail: > > test:/usr/ports/packages/All# pkg -j 1 add apache22-2.2.31_1.txz > apr-1.5.2.1.5.4.txz > pkg: apache22-2.2.31_1.txz: No such file or directory > pkg: Was 'pkg install apache22-2.2.31_1.txz' meant? > pkg: apr-1.5.2.1.5.4.txz: No such file or directory > pkg: Was 'pkg install apr-1.5.2.1.5.4.txz' meant? > > Failed to install the following 2 package(s): apache22-2.2.31_1.txz, > apr-1.5.2.1.5.4.txz > > If there is "No such file or directory", where does pkg look for them? (I > also tried to use full path; the result is the same) Or is pkg-add an > exception which doesn't work with -j option? > > -Alnis The way you build a jail is to have /usr/ports and /usr/local be on the jail not on the base. The later is by default. If you log into the base system and look at the file tree you can see how you are set up. I use exjail that provides an option for this and I look at this so rarely I 're-learn' what I need each time. The jail an ezjail man pages are very well done. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun Jul 31 22:41:00 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC577BAA0DA for ; Sun, 31 Jul 2016 22:41:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from woodsb02@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yw0-x234.google.com (mail-yw0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6EE3E1193 for ; Sun, 31 Jul 2016 22:41:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from woodsb02@gmail.com) Received: by mail-yw0-x234.google.com with SMTP id u134so158346690ywg.3 for ; Sun, 31 Jul 2016 15:41:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Hn56/bYt5aFNMwxrHhpxvHe7vDTzWebxuPFjzZ/zkYk=; b=KackOHu2tvzH8zCDs3kWWlq4nop/y0nchplHcbeV0Eysmfi7w6N2pjwB5NN96nh0X/ nKkRcJtFavyQyvCYV/LU2IetXVnAgsdQtRQrFmdJtfmAbWf/8Z9pZc/vyC2DAoGzp2XC nkABaywpiiQOfBGOK2x1vFECzyIA/cwQJF6ML/ogM+UB3PxP1i/dE8WLIl33ZZKYbwUa JxSBoTx4SjChUIDRb6Vbe0f5l/oZEEC2ulLYReLfttRFd70VfPJgNwolZAsI0YvIyT9x rzN76HyUsV97i9txULZWnCopdd7vZhAOg1WZFku7nC1ngv2xtwJuE9i1wTiLhI4IOSIN JG2g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Hn56/bYt5aFNMwxrHhpxvHe7vDTzWebxuPFjzZ/zkYk=; b=QtdisVEQEzrhr9/vAjsjmW8kMbjjY8h8pXOzS/9GLjMOubFRVPLDz1wZdwhkgdkx2s IdiL3By2yd7WYgCa0GHySqRe9HEzUBuBgk1OhZlD9ootobQoY6XBm2xqbSBrPXttpDwV exx+++qaro25/sZJE7512ltvPSVimmGUF4W0z911ojbs+Ve9n8j1lcGJp+D/tyFI6+Hn wzVIWxXA1utVmTUfkWIxqYf8Ki+n+W+fDx/KWEHOPfZDutK06XgVdyVAteBnfDSV5P2c k2Eb8JIf2Cv8tINlZAasnoYn3dZkWR0WAngj/OtDNgYsLbWQuBe0NoB2nglXAqSBIjlR WemA== X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoous215gucwjIvO7t3RJgAuRjwx+4/fFvtyzCDFsSFayLjA2bkhl4TI+3IUQGQguRPSUk8lL6ZqgqR3pl4Q== X-Received: by 10.37.43.129 with SMTP id r123mr39844864ybr.51.1470004859001; Sun, 31 Jul 2016 15:40:59 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.37.199.65 with HTTP; Sun, 31 Jul 2016 15:40:58 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1997dd6e-1abd-4d4f-e95b-0f4679543a16@mail.com> References: <1997dd6e-1abd-4d4f-e95b-0f4679543a16@mail.com> From: Ben Woods Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2016 06:40:58 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: pkg-add for installing into a jail? To: Alnis Morics Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2016 22:41:00 -0000 On Sunday, 31 July 2016, Alnis Morics wrote: > Hi, > > I could successfully use "pkg -j 1 " many times to install > packages onto a jail. > > But now I had to change an option in a port, so I built a package myself: > > portmaster -g www/apache22 > > The package and its dependency was stored to /usr/ports/packages/All (as I > set it in $PACKAGES): > > apache22-2.2.31_1.txz apr-1.5.2.1.5.4.txz > > I can now install these packages using pkg-add on the host, but not onto > the jail: > > test:/usr/ports/packages/All# pkg -j 1 add apache22-2.2.31_1.txz > apr-1.5.2.1.5.4.txz > pkg: apache22-2.2.31_1.txz: No such file or directory > pkg: Was 'pkg install apache22-2.2.31_1.txz' meant? > pkg: apr-1.5.2.1.5.4.txz: No such file or directory > pkg: Was 'pkg install apr-1.5.2.1.5.4.txz' meant? > > Failed to install the following 2 package(s): apache22-2.2.31_1.txz, > apr-1.5.2.1.5.4.txz > > If there is "No such file or directory", where does pkg look for them? (I > also tried to use full path; the result is the same) Or is pkg-add an > exception which doesn't work with -j option? > > -Alnis > It looks like the package you are trying to install is not in the directory that pkg is running from within the jail. Either they are on the host filesystem but not passed through to the jail, or pkg runs from a different directory within the jail. If you have your host system ports directory nullfs mounted inside the jail also, this might be fixed by specifying the absolute path of the package. # pkg -j 1 add /usr/ports/packages/All/apache22-2.2.31_1.txz /usr/ports/packages/All/apr-1.5.2.1.5.4.txz Check if your ports tree has the same directory inside the jail, and contains these files. Good luck! Ben -- -- From: Benjamin Woods woodsb02@gmail.com From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Aug 1 01:50:39 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EA7ABAA734 for ; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 01:50:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bourne.identity@hotmail.com) Received: from SNT004-OMC3S25.hotmail.com (snt004-omc3s25.hotmail.com [65.55.90.164]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.outlook.com", Issuer "Microsoft IT SSL SHA2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C43771597 for ; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 01:50:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bourne.identity@hotmail.com) Received: from EUR01-HE1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([65.55.90.136]) by SNT004-OMC3S25.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.23008); Sun, 31 Jul 2016 18:49:32 -0700 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hotmail.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=OjW5zoa1AOfZmXbglE1FtWITGAbA+p4h0f6CJYf0wc4=; b=dcCYcCk5ZXrlb9TAG8Q1ItEKENSFLrMphwqcBoaUwZ6JEnluEObxgQMFV3Xpxb+JTi2U/PxVwlCvyk7xJyTl9ArQnGrRH8mLHI8BPuTmCQ9+U6o111p9+4LnYcavx9G8vy27hAqhY9DXF7Q5rGE6Olcp9aYucmY1aj1JsJKImvf40h+Zu0ZnREMlpBkqiUt7sOXuyUyJ9fV0b7tI78JEFE3OxqJpqkG8W49zeegcIEs1eTIi3QqFJoPJCCQVJ8wa2eGKvTNQftAtZtakMQRlhkN5HPJ8TCbuHLOss+aCIlVWYQe1BMjHTgbAyxocKV1RC7rxSy9+j6lpNQnSq6ESKw== Received: from HE1EUR01FT023.eop-EUR01.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.0.56) by HE1EUR01HT020.eop-EUR01.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.0.230) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_0, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA_P384) id 15.1.549.5; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 01:49:30 +0000 Received: from VI1PR02MB0974.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com (10.152.0.60) by HE1EUR01FT023.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.0.162) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.1.557.8 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 01:49:30 +0000 Received: from VI1PR02MB0974.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com ([10.163.162.28]) by VI1PR02MB0974.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com ([10.163.162.28]) with mapi id 15.01.0549.021; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 01:49:28 +0000 From: Manish Jain To: FreeBSD Questions Subject: How to install packages from local storage? Thread-Topic: How to install packages from local storage? Thread-Index: AQHR65bw6EyYhqk2OEuPWqgGrWK2UQ== Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2016 01:49:28 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: authentication-results: spf=softfail (sender IP is 10.152.0.60) smtp.mailfrom=hotmail.com; freebsd.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;freebsd.org; dmarc=fail action=none header.from=hotmail.com; received-spf: SoftFail (protection.outlook.com: domain of transitioning hotmail.com discourages use of 10.152.0.60 as permitted sender) x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1 x-eopattributedmessage: 0 x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:10.152.0.60; IPV:NLI; CTRY:; EFV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(98900003); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:HE1EUR01HT020; H:VI1PR02MB0974.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; HE1EUR01HT020; 6:O17KZbUNYJG0g8cK5uZiLMi10Cm1p7xPXkGYIJuBeuFUelZnq9AeaCUY7pv8d5tL1gXe3swo3ch+LQkiVmzlA0GF3+CR3uEXQYJmSxldSnKbbA1R4BELoql83SOUKtxJUEVOufSLLZEZsY3OlEcWAd3MbtPWH5A7OlQG2ej3ibS/hRoKvWcUx20GErGPTAHnhda6QSUrg6Ai5a0qNnoxo8fuesMDv6/rIkiNs5cGu7/NayGbyJvJV394J5UZAQ05nHphbFG7+XAy0Ur4LvlmQX4ziJ7JafcCKYV0/+x5rZfp8QIo86v48ky5xImTXizv; 5:b5IoCPZ0qFWP5M2ifMsiNOCIt6AEQWlnIe6xgyGZSaTyMUkwOoNlvujR6lBgfLQThwb5jFOO/piXIetHBnxT1GXv/B6FW/ZlIsinLf+i4+bMQpab9ZDsBA3kiU1tNM4kj8/H/959lrqhZ9fANR7Iag==; 24:CPL5fbRH7z3SZEXjTN+ateZP6ROFnddlEZoAehymR4Dy89vQbL2UUr3tqg2cebrxQM0QXN0aFn2buwbwVG7sn66YqH8iVE/5VwEKy8a/cho=; 7:czgN//Pi7xTHrvEFfrGbZkm8XarzaI9vNc5ugspBCtfhICSz2/ipezE6NcE1kgw04bP9CUqoOrSaaYViEC91tFj+63rfdch41/Rxl44YA2gNZG1v4ROX5ZUgrYHhCcK3QxinJlYn4/VnnvPN1WP+rwXOr58jOpu6ZOHCj1vEcMHThVNF8fVchPqu2d/mAMiQzQG82DwYAmo37vG/Xy0wrLQJYM8XrFQHr1QbqMhFYzxisS/4vnzBy2Q2qqBecQdi x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: bccfa9ac-a3cc-4a70-d941-08d3b9ae124b x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(1601124038)(1601125047); SRVR:HE1EUR01HT020; x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(432015012)(82015046); SRVR:HE1EUR01HT020; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:HE1EUR01HT020; x-forefront-prvs: 0021920B5A spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99 spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <727131A41D6A934AB7B0F97D8E4EA370@eurprd02.prod.outlook.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: hotmail.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 01 Aug 2016 01:49:28.5802 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Internet X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: HE1EUR01HT020 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Aug 2016 01:49:32.0936 (UTC) FILETIME=[F3437080:01D1EB96] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2016 01:50:39 -0000 Hi, I have been asked by a friend to move 6 laptops in his company from=20 Windows/Ubuntu to FreeBSD. I was wondering if I could save some time by=20 not having to download the packages on each laptop. I would ideally like=20 to download packages on 1 laptop, and then reuse those packages on the=20 other laptops (probably via USB flash media). Is that possible ? If yes, can somebody please give me some useful how-to information ? Thanks Manish Jain From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Aug 1 01:55:05 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55F3EBAA95E for ; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 01:55:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brian@brianwhalen.net) Received: from mail-wm0-x22f.google.com (mail-wm0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E749018AE for ; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 01:55:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brian@brianwhalen.net) Received: by mail-wm0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id p129so50613308wmp.0 for ; Sun, 31 Jul 2016 18:55:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=brianwhalen-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=b4byofkDfChgpWXWG2aPCXqXsgoCJYvYRGomTMl0jsE=; b=dBQUY5ndsxhNs4wV835rYTKhD6hx6K280YlmHFiX4Ul3GJdV9FJYnDA8y78cX2iECh 4TxMKh+vj+7zjBtBXU8G18EnsIpl6p1SffXAxxn8n5+tN8AyG5yOX73+rrLLxgHMShW1 MPluoaVvxeQWIZKJrWVsmGeJIo77ps/ytEaiKM+Okhgop7MsID5n7DI/3Z5VFkg4R+Om dzm+PnSiXnQPX0Kh0wq5XY4Jt+GomRTPzDnlTkan4fvQCK1MKpsqeMpYZ/0/CqZz9bqI oENArYG+4bXQ5tqsFggD8wb8fsc+T8b75s559zgTAsADrskiTWE+3IXxqLe0bOrE2AyX 0hvw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=b4byofkDfChgpWXWG2aPCXqXsgoCJYvYRGomTMl0jsE=; b=Vx2QpROtyRTEmszdhBVSEr5mDMh3TehAyZ/RuJttxGyGszTP4Rx/1S46OLgXL3ympT CNvzQADkTYFbOp6qmRxqxn8WhKBqL45YTs7ghh6FjaphzLx32V4GwOyQR8PiMt+Bimiv nFqVXHWX3wRH5qipyyggkRreibPFi5yS74nq0Ky6Q6UoH+SJYF9uzBCu2XhZru5hfi0g +qnmdUWslU5hjq7K1Ox8Is0ACrQS+cE+iMDMyEszRd6XHwSEy+shjBYpnr4gwHwjwywu F7bt16jykAWmOapjHs56aHoep92km/mn2RDRM8o92XjfIwLqIBQgAi5ztosL9f5QceXT mU0A== X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoouuqmDbRRisW3OqzAGI+sEWLUFcfk47tWBtHe7qUgymHej5If6VGYqWSxiHWpg30opb4d4RD3X8gwMdkFQ== X-Received: by 10.28.140.10 with SMTP id o10mr11697364wmd.36.1470016502727; Sun, 31 Jul 2016 18:55:02 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.28.6.3 with HTTP; Sun, 31 Jul 2016 18:55:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [2606:6000:cd06:7f00:996:91c0:bfdf:bb7d] Received: by 10.28.6.3 with HTTP; Sun, 31 Jul 2016 18:55:01 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: "Brian W." Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2016 18:55:01 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: How to install packages from local storage? To: Manish Jain Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2016 01:55:05 -0000 Building a poudriere repo seems a solution for this. Brian On Jul 31, 2016 6:50 PM, "Manish Jain" wrote: > Hi, > > I have been asked by a friend to move 6 laptops in his company from > Windows/Ubuntu to FreeBSD. I was wondering if I could save some time by > not having to download the packages on each laptop. I would ideally like > to download packages on 1 laptop, and then reuse those packages on the > other laptops (probably via USB flash media). > > Is that possible ? If yes, can somebody please give me some useful > how-to information ? > > Thanks > Manish Jain > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Aug 1 01:59:46 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D05BCBAAA16 for ; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 01:59:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ultima1252@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yw0-x234.google.com (mail-yw0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8DBFC19C1 for ; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 01:59:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ultima1252@gmail.com) Received: by mail-yw0-x234.google.com with SMTP id z8so160634646ywa.1 for ; Sun, 31 Jul 2016 18:59:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=viEEnRtqdAejjKILi/ikbOaXHaIjd4rtBApqtKFNTAI=; b=V+i880itedrKiQuaT0Qg2oW3gevenMxvSFlo8igJ62QaL5VxQq3jEFpIBVLMPGRdqI plPYXB3uztKB6AUsP6vdEuIINfFQ6k4Cf4jHmD3nPhibgq8QFviHTypvCcOmhmnTDqgb DyWzMuowpwN7+k9NpPdVs+NySIXZ/Uu1UIeAGqRaDYwMq+Py9aTZc4X06iP3oaxHRIzI Y3g2vydnGf+PyEMB8K+OgT1MmdHQFnspZXy22eD1bGxSVAYJhRJ9VX/bwIci9tPnI8UV dWfhqfO4FN2PR+4ToxmSd9xzvrUoNdtWWVsl2FxdTOqxgbMVy1mcAGpPJ6HXKEiLBLwm H11g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=viEEnRtqdAejjKILi/ikbOaXHaIjd4rtBApqtKFNTAI=; b=jJgj8MIefsec+27hpQcZ2d9YSywoUYXksNL3dAUJJluxwzwWGWHQ+jRnme5tF+XziP ek+N7eaFtom8GHZrcgiyqALEhZy8DdB0NJkUnPwoCfSyqe85alpMDnuryvhvyI4M3a/C 66hISMN9yRaYd8P6B16NriM+x6VtOBpd37GDt+/UR6TAy6NGALJK+fyCDA0lrnTsMluc Cyk4+BeVnO8FoZ3TYI+RuuGm9Y8MdmNQSzO3Oh4OpFSO7RZ3RVlS4lDXqC+YjNaC6FPa zLjQ0NfyYNp7hYNyDUTyPIRbo+cQhEr/RhO78vq/JeXAgb4KCtK19TMCE+Woxve+FLQ2 5tGA== X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoouvS2Us0FiDh3/lxflC1HVRi1B4iY3IrihaGpVkB+/2V+tyLE15TuPlJXwA5ScJOcoENCvp/PolR4ZzR7g== X-Received: by 10.37.207.134 with SMTP id f128mr6665160ybg.34.1470016785746; Sun, 31 Jul 2016 18:59:45 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.129.51.150 with HTTP; Sun, 31 Jul 2016 18:59:45 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Ultima Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2016 21:59:45 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: How to install packages from local storage? To: "Brian W." Cc: Manish Jain , FreeBSD Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2016 01:59:46 -0000 Another solution, though I have not tried this, have the labtops mount a nfs on /var/cache/pkg they will share the pkg's they download, though it may not be the best or safest solution. On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 9:55 PM, Brian W. wrote: > Building a poudriere repo seems a solution for this. > > Brian > > On Jul 31, 2016 6:50 PM, "Manish Jain" > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I have been asked by a friend to move 6 laptops in his company from > > Windows/Ubuntu to FreeBSD. I was wondering if I could save some time by > > not having to download the packages on each laptop. I would ideally like > > to download packages on 1 laptop, and then reuse those packages on the > > other laptops (probably via USB flash media). > > > > Is that possible ? If yes, can somebody please give me some useful > > how-to information ? > > > > Thanks > > Manish Jain > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Aug 1 02:11:55 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7120FBAACC0 for ; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 02:11:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gregory.orange@calorieking.com) Received: from pandora.au.calorieking.net (mail.au.calorieking.net [115.70.179.114]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D53E1E41 for ; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 02:11:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gregory.orange@calorieking.com) Received: from pandora.au.calorieking.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pandora.au.calorieking.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A883A114 for ; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 10:11:37 +0800 (WST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at calorieking.com Received: from pandora.au.calorieking.net ([127.0.0.1]) by pandora.au.calorieking.net (mail.au.calorieking.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iw4_9AcqtD1W for ; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 10:11:37 +0800 (WST) Received: from [192.168.2.118] (freia.ne1.au.calorieking.net [192.168.2.118]) by pandora.au.calorieking.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 468E510D for ; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 10:11:37 +0800 (WST) Subject: Re: How to install packages from local storage? To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: From: Gregory Orange Message-ID: <35c71c4c-31d8-5212-a8dd-ebfc6f7d763d@calorieking.com> Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2016 10:11:37 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2016 02:11:55 -0000 On 01/08/16 09:49, Manish Jain wrote: > I have been asked by a friend to move 6 laptops in his company from > Windows/Ubuntu to FreeBSD. I was wondering if I could save some time by > not having to download the packages on each laptop. I would ideally like > to download packages on 1 laptop, and then reuse those packages on the > other laptops (probably via USB flash media). For only 6 machines, you could install once, then sync the cache to the others before installing there. This means you don't have to invest any effort into infrastructure to support it. Updates would either need roughly the same process, or just take the hit on download time and bandwidth cost on each machine, depending on your requirements. If you want the benefits of simpler updates without the download time and bandwidth cost, then using 'pkg repo' to create a repo somewhere on your network is a very simple step. Poudriere seems like overkill for a simple installation of binary packages - I've stopped using it for the dozen or more machines where I deploy packages. This is my suggestion: * [host1]# pkg install $packages_list * [host1]# for i in host2-6; do rsync -a --delete /var/cache/pkg $i:/var/cache/pkg * [host2-6]# pkg install $packages_list clusterssh (cssh) could help you do the final step in a single set of keystrokes. HTH, Greg. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Aug 1 02:17:10 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 492E1BAAD71 for ; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 02:17:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bourne.identity@hotmail.com) Received: from BAY004-OMC3S6.hotmail.com (bay004-omc3s6.hotmail.com [65.54.190.144]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.outlook.com", Issuer "Microsoft IT SSL SHA2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 15AC111BA for ; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 02:17:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bourne.identity@hotmail.com) Received: from EUR01-HE1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([65.54.190.189]) by BAY004-OMC3S6.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.23008); Sun, 31 Jul 2016 19:16:04 -0700 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hotmail.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=YJ9HBbJ/usDl/Jnklo4Mon3BU43wi7DzqLuwfUPYg0k=; b=pFBH3/P+l+mX6s4vmVczvy3ugElg2kjZ3f9pgA86uQaFWR167xOLp1ptJbgWlFp8Peu1a0AOVenTNPDN5Qy0BcOj7HKR5QRS5z6/pX8bLUawIO8FWWjjfeWv6QZIX8uA+wpypsCwNafqskC/9l9/Kt7YwuASTfF3C9i8UQf3niVuZZX81OHXPEwC9kbF1s9wyUrx7dkEuhryybygZIbEN/O5krIDqJXtq1jUOluhRldFyJ/SwsaiBB3vCW4HatpMWC0LyqY4nePJGVxP+jYSTUZ7kSvmsX9vBO0gVeuuqgNxKnx8jzfjcioUpXyBufeNKdiSQZwhScD+clxv+ETZMg== Received: from DB5EUR01FT046.eop-EUR01.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.4.51) by DB5EUR01HT069.eop-EUR01.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.5.143) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_0, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA_P384) id 15.1.557.8; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 02:16:02 +0000 Received: from VI1PR02MB0974.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com (10.152.4.58) by DB5EUR01FT046.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.5.231) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.1.557.8 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 02:16:02 +0000 Received: from VI1PR02MB0974.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com ([10.163.162.28]) by VI1PR02MB0974.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com ([10.163.162.28]) with mapi id 15.01.0549.021; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 02:15:55 +0000 From: Manish Jain To: Ultima CC: Brian W. , FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: How to install packages from local storage? Thread-Topic: How to install packages from local storage? Thread-Index: AQHR65bw6EyYhqk2OEuPWqgGrWK2UaAzWD+AgAABU4CAAARxgA== Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2016 02:15:55 +0000 Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: authentication-results: spf=softfail (sender IP is 10.152.4.58) smtp.mailfrom=hotmail.com; gmail.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;gmail.com; dmarc=fail action=none header.from=hotmail.com; received-spf: SoftFail (protection.outlook.com: domain of transitioning hotmail.com discourages use of 10.152.4.58 as permitted sender) x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1 x-eopattributedmessage: 0 x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:10.152.4.58; IPV:NLI; CTRY:; EFV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(98900003); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:DB5EUR01HT069; H:VI1PR02MB0974.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; DB5EUR01HT069; 6:VReJIJz1T2e3nbm1JlaSjn6wAMtk5nQS+HW5yljWeApaJhG0SS90le2SZpgT2AHwDVaRO+MVGs7/+taqBYXcsHEwCjchBqCTWqMaDAXMxKBNHfYC+ITDbsgckmKq9Mm5lSM4hV2ZrFbbvvyoiO08f9bvDR+AfwpUCloRUbRy5neSuTV4DBCa/okD6EvhreqRUJivZSj8Uek59j86wS0YYDNQFJESSCWn1ZXNXZNz04hKKCSGIWznuhdSjBeqMeSrBtzI7OXjWfH9NKTqVE5x+ReUto+AN91bqaPVh+MuWLiAkwboJjvtHj48d+q0DU9W; 5:4cSVx05FzMR1QlDwgqCU08l5PReTWKFi3cWReO0A8+RbdnAU+anL9ohGLUXIHGxbbVrKBk8lqIdnPjxJenq1qII9mB7iFvJBytBLrl4zJS41gXNctgG0ZPUliulzyRvm2ASvIPBRhGaMH48XHL5GiA==; 24:89LFK3QyxBqT4Y8Dx8Bdl2BQ1bn1vptjReUHPqiRqc0v+myDoXWEFjKNez/GnqKRwHxR8kExQDkNLyAuC+0C9tJpg9iwhziMKlb16v+189I=; 7:1d7GzT+UnczZDK2iEXLv3wixZ+pQ5r46uA8wSahulxMIpHQM/UXFzPo4gVpKE6nLzfcWU58dPaid2jR7bZq4lKnYvddYInKXMOhDFToJmznReM2NQGIH8t7B6J7+B9UzAJLtufhFEMQMyCq+zp2BrGvysKF8e8JdtP3J8rz2cAuB337XFbDaXOhrI8UxwWIy6kVLJLkpnlRSNRwmB6QwkNT5dv14SqAUNt2FsUjdMLUKyU49unoPrYKzW9gxcH7j x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: f9b454af-222f-4167-ec81-08d3b9b1c452 x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(1601124038)(1601125047); SRVR:DB5EUR01HT069; x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(432015012)(82015046); SRVR:DB5EUR01HT069; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:DB5EUR01HT069; x-forefront-prvs: 0021920B5A spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99 spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: hotmail.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 01 Aug 2016 02:15:55.6841 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Internet X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DB5EUR01HT069 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Aug 2016 02:16:05.0095 (UTC) FILETIME=[A8439F70:01D1EB9A] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2016 02:17:10 -0000 T24gTW9uLCBBdWcgMSwgMjAxNiBhdCA3OjI5IEFNLCBVbHRpbWEgPHVsdGltYTEyNTJAZ21haWwu Y29tPiB3cm90ZToNCkFub3RoZXIgc29sdXRpb24sIHRob3VnaCBJIGhhdmUgbm90IHRyaWVkIHRo aXMsIGhhdmUgdGhlIGxhYnRvcHMgbW91bnQgYSBuZnMgb24gL3Zhci9jYWNoZS9wa2cgdGhleSB3 aWxsIHNoYXJlIHRoZSBwa2cncyB0aGV5IGRvd25sb2FkLCB0aG91Z2ggaXQgbWF5IG5vdCBiZSB0 aGUgYmVzdCBvciBzYWZlc3Qgc29sdXRpb24uDQoNCkRvZXMgdGhhdCBtZWFuIChwcmVzdW1pbmcg L3Zhci9jYWNoZS9wa2cgb24gYWxsIGxhcHRvcHMgaXMgbW91bnRlZCB2aWEgTkZTIHRvIHNvbWV3 aGVyZSBvbiB0aGUgbmV0d29yayksIEkganVzdCBoYXZlIHRvIHJ1biAncGtnIGluc3RhbGwgZ25v bWUzJyBhbmQgdGhlIGdub21lMyBwa2cgd2lsbCBiZSBhY2Nlc3NlZCBmcm9tIC92YXIvY2FjaGUv cGtnIHJhdGhlciB0aGFuIGJlaW5nIGRvd25sb2FkZWQgPw0KDQpJZiB0aGF0IHdvcmtzLCB0aGVu IHdoeSBub3QganVzdCBjb3B5IGxvY2FsLnNxbGl0ZSAoSSB0aGluayB0aGlzIGlzIC92YXIvZGIv cGtnKSBvbiB0aGUgZmlyc3Qgc3lzdGVtLCBhbmQgcGFzdGUgaXQgb24gdGhlIG90aGVyIGxhcHRv cHMgPw0KDQpJIGFsc28gc2VlIHRoYXQgcGtnIGhhcyBhIGNvbW1hbmQgJ2FkZCcuIFdoYXQgaXMg dGhhdCBmb3IgPw0K From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Aug 1 02:24:32 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB392BAA131 for ; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 02:24:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ultima1252@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yw0-x22a.google.com (mail-yw0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60414170A for ; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 02:24:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ultima1252@gmail.com) Received: by mail-yw0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id u134so161026478ywg.3 for ; Sun, 31 Jul 2016 19:24:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=DoTXmAYC3ZmRhnqg/QANz/Qo3mEEsPCD8MRdVrKL028=; b=V817Amw0ApNmR0y2iWF086d+yAGZvb7/1bi5/5+HscsdLTBVHJNQKw27BLu56hgqgV LQWuUjRDcaabxlCDesNSm0FfWkMFu6k7P7mzyhm5xUClXcCqHeYzOqJvyHbHZgMW9hzl VGped1AiV2H/OxWq0pGKDX9tlIfeFjMYB2QLyfDM/HsjG+p7551MRe218L5w9LiIvG0c 2Rm9ekuAYZflAHrhTkoFv05YtCveRV22s1/+QgrNQL25E/QQGmE65Kb/Vf9Jgz+Pe1D4 UCjLopFg7nv+XPsWSoefUat6oyNRT8+MKr7fdEtXmB9rdBnoAJfT+BTvwX9TFtWcMPGu Igwg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=DoTXmAYC3ZmRhnqg/QANz/Qo3mEEsPCD8MRdVrKL028=; b=VJ6xz4IFkyGimK1fjMMFZrx+JdcnzUIwwF4p8miTQrMM0XP0Nd52aHA5tAVDROAXXf J4yuAq6SJck527HWWd1AyP/HjCAGx/gfLxuhM37WDLgX7EShnQ8IpOFO7MyZ5yiSceG1 YuuGwv2gR3lx4C/bArnSDCZfmAswbSyYLEPccEIzShrv++7fXpx3CuPO8WbdOIwqcQOD oRDOfeSmTjAeLXFmtUbXA86Q2U1ajZGaWijTm5G6+Xyh67M9hOSFYZvc7SQSUhbo0MSV aIglcP7cb6Kjto74UlWLNQdwBKDcYvWYmnub1RqiesH9PTpLd5eCvHo4Y2SHFNHb+eJy kVRg== X-Gm-Message-State: AEkooutSWj2PqBLGkIxtcwFp7l4fyxPMCVKBpPFhylXbnNPz0N1PZgUi8lWzJhpDy4/7p9RjqM08Lds7hr93dw== X-Received: by 10.13.219.199 with SMTP id d190mr48381399ywe.22.1470018271632; Sun, 31 Jul 2016 19:24:31 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.129.51.150 with HTTP; Sun, 31 Jul 2016 19:24:31 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Ultima Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2016 22:24:31 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: How to install packages from local storage? To: Manish Jain Cc: "Brian W." , FreeBSD Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2016 02:24:32 -0000 When a package is downloaded, it is stored in /var/db/pkg, If all the labtops have the same mountpoint in /var/db/pkg, when one downloads a package it will appear there for all the labtops. This dir is checked before downloading the pkg. On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 10:15 PM, Manish Jain wrote: > On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 7:29 AM, Ultima wrote: > > Another solution, though I have not tried this, have the labtops mount a > nfs on /var/cache/pkg they will share the pkg's they download, though it > may not be the best or safest solution. > > > Does that mean (presuming /var/cache/pkg on all laptops is mounted via NFS > to somewhere on the network), I just have to run 'pkg install gnome3' and > the gnome3 pkg will be accessed from /var/cache/pkg rather than being > downloaded ? > > If that works, then why not just copy local.sqlite (I think this is > /var/db/pkg) on the first system, and paste it on the other laptops ? > > I also see that pkg has a command 'add'. What is that for ? > From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Aug 1 02:24:56 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 369FEBAA18C for ; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 02:24:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ultima1252@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yw0-x233.google.com (mail-yw0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF76D17B6 for ; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 02:24:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ultima1252@gmail.com) Received: by mail-yw0-x233.google.com with SMTP id u134so161031518ywg.3 for ; Sun, 31 Jul 2016 19:24:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=SHEeFSh0UlKHXCVTsDtsM2GphfOlmLzRb967xVIKRoo=; b=HDqoRgtAQ+q3ZVtCC40331dY8q0fnansD+5ZYVkL4xktAGg3t7+i4TwI3oc0vdIHKo fUD4YjOEQX3Tijsc5e7oMVKvmTYFVthhlWlc9l35AfRkxWg5K3PqIWiSo8JTC6T8U9kI aOkNGEASCJIWHcdXqdme4N0t4nZsuOLyk71LmCiZtGlU4jZI2bMck0LIOfKgPlfdmSW8 dKyKHz6mL719MjKeIwuoPPCN7/kvEKsRVZ4heDEf+xEYpg8by/2kft2IOIMjMiYkJCRY utcMZPA3HgZ2duc8RUZct9nk05RezfMOZ66YW7QExZBSxubiGJevSjb5cbaS8kHzdCDk Bc3A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=SHEeFSh0UlKHXCVTsDtsM2GphfOlmLzRb967xVIKRoo=; b=iPTolGhp4I1A42kYPfnnCopmdBbIlpjOXh+Q/9R5RGAI9mtTq5gLnn4zNLChCh9dCo HI6Za/loSsqwwX5zR2Hrna/0znl/MYU8QJUqkM44O7aSqH4jGub6BzRUfcViaJCdIkdT nga9Wbg8tbDVhOjNWeAAhNdXsAu+x44MeOJG5Mw+8MAf+y8VT+DXeQ2zKbaYN0jaFwQ5 RjM5JctmguwV5jjITPYcZn+OdCDBk8bRm8EpUPbTuWd6++IzDe7OXBFSCe3x/b3NKZL9 AgbeRgjuHMR2BeAsZ/sB/uNfjApY1FUTw4yDTA81sQ70VRyXM9/JE+WoEqum+GzMXadz Efjg== X-Gm-Message-State: AEkooutb7ee0T0CZ+yjQ4Vr7CjHT1YZqBcBgWSqErNZaUrPlPcHZ8qODz1gE64pxzFcqL/nrLHmWq8gQGHyZbw== X-Received: by 10.129.76.79 with SMTP id z76mr43170854ywa.33.1470018295233; Sun, 31 Jul 2016 19:24:55 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.129.51.150 with HTTP; Sun, 31 Jul 2016 19:24:54 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Ultima Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2016 22:24:54 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: How to install packages from local storage? To: Manish Jain Cc: "Brian W." , FreeBSD Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2016 02:24:56 -0000 Sorry, /var/cache/pkg, not db. On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 10:24 PM, Ultima wrote: > When a package is downloaded, it is stored in /var/db/pkg, If all the > labtops have the same mountpoint in /var/db/pkg, when one downloads a > package it will appear there for all the labtops. This dir is checked > before downloading the pkg. > > On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 10:15 PM, Manish Jain > wrote: > >> On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 7:29 AM, Ultima wrote: >> >> Another solution, though I have not tried this, have the labtops mount a >> nfs on /var/cache/pkg they will share the pkg's they download, though it >> may not be the best or safest solution. >> >> >> Does that mean (presuming /var/cache/pkg on all laptops is mounted via >> NFS to somewhere on the network), I just have to run 'pkg install gnome3' >> and the gnome3 pkg will be accessed from /var/cache/pkg rather than being >> downloaded ? >> >> If that works, then why not just copy local.sqlite (I think this is >> /var/db/pkg) on the first system, and paste it on the other laptops ? >> >> I also see that pkg has a command 'add'. What is that for ? >> > > From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Aug 1 02:29:08 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24A04BAA369 for ; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 02:29:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gregory.orange@calorieking.com) Received: from pandora.au.calorieking.net (mail.au.calorieking.net [115.70.179.114]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C49AC1B40 for ; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 02:29:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gregory.orange@calorieking.com) Received: from pandora.au.calorieking.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pandora.au.calorieking.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 819A4111 for ; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 10:29:04 +0800 (WST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at calorieking.com Received: from pandora.au.calorieking.net ([127.0.0.1]) by pandora.au.calorieking.net (mail.au.calorieking.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Qd8JvMXDsHt4 for ; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 10:29:04 +0800 (WST) Received: from [192.168.2.118] (freia.ne1.au.calorieking.net [192.168.2.118]) by pandora.au.calorieking.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 295BF95 for ; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 10:29:04 +0800 (WST) Subject: Re: How to install packages from local storage? To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: From: Gregory Orange Message-ID: <7ece5e0d-0f13-e93d-1226-deff341b11c7@calorieking.com> Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2016 10:29:04 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2016 02:29:08 -0000 On 01/08/16 10:15, Manish Jain wrote: > I also see that pkg has a command 'add'. What is that for ? Useful for adding an arbitrary package file without using a pkg repository, but I think less useful than using 'pkg install'. If you really want to use and maintain your own package files (e.g. created with 'pkg add', or copied from /var/cache/pkg - perhaps using just 'pkg fetch -d' instead of 'pkg install') then it's easy to put them all somewhere then run 'pkg repo' on them, and share that (read-only in my case) over NFS. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Aug 1 02:37:02 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C774DBAA628 for ; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 02:37:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gregory.orange@calorieking.com) Received: from pandora.au.calorieking.net (mail.au.calorieking.net [115.70.179.114]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 72276127C for ; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 02:37:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gregory.orange@calorieking.com) Received: from pandora.au.calorieking.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pandora.au.calorieking.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0FAF111 for ; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 10:36:48 +0800 (WST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at calorieking.com Received: from pandora.au.calorieking.net ([127.0.0.1]) by pandora.au.calorieking.net (mail.au.calorieking.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id S8nbmVRdMTeE for ; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 10:36:48 +0800 (WST) Received: from [192.168.2.118] (freia.ne1.au.calorieking.net [192.168.2.118]) by pandora.au.calorieking.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9EA5D95 for ; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 10:36:48 +0800 (WST) Subject: Re: How to install packages from local storage? To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <7ece5e0d-0f13-e93d-1226-deff341b11c7@calorieking.com> From: Gregory Orange Message-ID: Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2016 10:36:48 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <7ece5e0d-0f13-e93d-1226-deff341b11c7@calorieking.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2016 02:37:02 -0000 On 01/08/16 10:29, Gregory Orange wrote: > e.g. created with 'pkg add' Ugh, I mean 'pkg create' - from an installed package. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Aug 1 03:23:59 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5788BAAFEE for ; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 03:23:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wam@hiwaay.net) Received: from fly.hiwaay.net (fly.hiwaay.net [216.180.54.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B2E6B1A2D for ; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 03:23:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wam@hiwaay.net) Received: from kabini1.local (dynamic-216-186-209-65.knology.net [216.186.209.65] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by fly.hiwaay.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/fly) with ESMTP id u713HB8s019588 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 31 Jul 2016 22:17:12 -0500 Subject: Re: How to install packages from local storage? To: FreeBSD Questions References: From: "William A. Mahaffey III" Message-ID: Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2016 22:22:41 -0453.75 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2016 03:24:00 -0000 On 07/31/16 20:55, Manish Jain wrote: > Hi, > > I have been asked by a friend to move 6 laptops in his company from > Windows/Ubuntu to FreeBSD. I was wondering if I could save some time by > not having to download the packages on each laptop. I would ideally like > to download packages on 1 laptop, and then reuse those packages on the > other laptops (probably via USB flash media). > > Is that possible ? If yes, can somebody please give me some useful > how-to information ? > > Thanks > Manish Jain > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Download & burn 1 of the install images to a flash drive & do all boxen from that. I did that w/ 3 boxen on my LAN, worked AOK. You can add scripts to automate things to the flash drive once you have burned it. $0.02, no more, no less .... -- William A. Mahaffey III ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war ever devised by man." -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Aug 1 07:33:50 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE48CBAA079 for ; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 07:33:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from support@estuk.ru) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABD96134E for ; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 07:33:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from support@estuk.ru) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id AB24ABAA078; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 07:33:50 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAC0FBAA076 for ; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 07:33:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from support@estuk.ru) Received: from mail.estuk.ru (estuk.ru [109.120.189.19]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7DB39134D for ; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 07:33:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from support@estuk.ru) Message-ID: Reply-To: =?windows-1251?B?0crLwMTbIMIgwNDFzcTT?= From: =?windows-1251?B?0crLwMTbIMIgwNDFzcTT?= To: Subject: =?windows-1251?B?y8XSzcjFINbFzdsgzcAgwNDFzcTTIMIgzM7R?= =?windows-1251?B?ysLFISEh?= Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2016 12:33:45 +0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=estuk.ru; s=mail; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1470036825; h=message-id:from:to:subject:date:mime-version; bh=J3PA9edYbu9b6ZjZBnoz4kgg5WgdAZvmyDJ6fmPYaW4=; b=g5tT3831Gg3p3dM9Ca3L8mWfhK3RNqcli9HKrw42qX+rjamDjfWWFeWPpd4Dt0 Prrn24B8sMLck7bajahhwrRX259T4gm/cesk0ZehIXbOk+Jha7Ai07mhP1GnWooA KU+5oR3MUlXmxkwfOuU0L8JRnenT0sByLNG7lDWSSk75I= Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1251" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2016 07:33:50 -0000 =CB=C5=D2=CD=C8=C5 =D6=C5=CD=DB =CD=C0 =C0=D0=C5=CD=C4=D3 =C2 =CC=CE=D1=CA= =C2=C5!!! C=CA=CB=C0=C4 350 =EA=E2. =EC. =96 149 =F2.=F0. =E2 =EC=E5=F1=FF=F6 =D1=CA=CB=C0=C4 32 =EA=E2. =EC. =96 19 =F2. =F0. =E2 =EC=E5=F1=FF=F6 =C1=E5=F1=EF=EB=E0=F2=ED=FB=E9 =E2=FA=E5=E7=E4, =EE=F5=F0=E0=ED=FF=E5=EC=E0= =FF =F2=E5=F0=F0=E8=F2=EE=F0=E8=FF 1 =FD=F2=E0=E6, =F8=E8=F0=EE=EA=E8=E9 =EF=E0=ED=E4=F3=F1, =E2=E8=E4=E5=EE= =ED=E0=E1=EB=FE=E4=E5=ED=E8=E5 =CE=D2=C2=C5=D2=D1=D2=C2=C5=CD=CD=CE=C5 =D5=D0=C0=CD=C5=CD=C8=C5: =EE=F2 15 =F0=F3=E1. =E7=E0 =EA=E2. =EC. =EE=F2 22 =F0=F3=E1. =E7=E0 =EF=E0=EB=EB=E5=F2=EE-=EC=E5=F1=F2=EE =D3=D1=CB=D3=C3=C8: =CF=EE=E3=F0=F3=E7=EE-=F0=E0=E7=E3=F0=F3=E7=EE=F7=ED=FB=E5 =F0=E0=E1=EE=F2= =FB =CA=EE=EC=EF=EB=E5=EA=F2=E0=F6=E8=FF, =EF=E5=F0=E5=F3=EF=E0=EA=EE=E2=EA=E0 =CA=F0=EE=F1=F1-=E4=EE=EA=E8=ED=E3, =EF=E5=F0=E5=E3=F0=F3=E7 =ED=E0 =EF=E0= =ED=E4=F3=F1=E5 =CA=EE=ED=F1=EE=EB=E8=E4=E0=F6=E8=FF =E3=F0=F3=E7=EE=E2 (495) 726-17-77, (495) 798-55-05 =DE=C0=CE, =EC. =CA=E0=ED=F2=E5=EC=E8=F0=EE=E2=F1=EA=E0=FF =C8=E7=E2=E8=ED=E8=F2=E5, =E5=F1=EB=E8 =EF=E8=F1=FC=EC=EE =E4=EE=F1=F2=E0= =E2=EB=E5=ED=EE =ED=E5 =EF=EE =E0=E4=F0=E5=F1=F3. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Aug 1 07:21:37 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87D5DBAAC4A for ; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 07:21:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alnis.m@mail.com) Received: from mout.gmx.com (mout.gmx.com [74.208.4.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 503A11BE6 for ; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 07:21:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alnis.m@mail.com) Received: from [192.168.7.62] ([87.246.164.215]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmxus002) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M4HBd-1bC2n72Flr-00rpIv for ; Mon, 01 Aug 2016 09:21:34 +0200 Subject: Re: pkg-add for installing into a jail? References: <1997dd6e-1abd-4d4f-e95b-0f4679543a16@mail.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Alnis Morics Message-ID: <41fb60ad-3377-4770-aeb3-8831b43c9a18@mail.com> Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2016 10:21:31 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/45.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:+aYIVW6v+wJcxTwenjgGLJc07kkdDzAnPLdX8OZs5lXKM3ctM89 VxziioBheVNQKFpNvF12Eq61Fif2VA1NR/4xm/BmMr9YjGL5jwqW5reH1mvOp29UI/omJ8l TjhwAioALX5MMLDzXeaR5oYRdf/4zxP2Flcrb2Xyrq03WvDyfk1Et8dJQla5joK5U2YzO2x oLvAE0KitA4E6LYcLMIDA== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:Lpxi9wKjpc8=:qN6eZJb+Ns85IrZRt0edMK MCxE8CoBIjzzre8mhnfDws9PF7xoMP1IgfTU+jmZVp/dOj2IRJAKZOPMf73pxoqMpHH80pCIG RWLI8GDt5q0EIiO+UAvqsLhB2Dv98BnGnF03Eub54GU23Um+4xotb/6ADcG+htyuwjuIdz6Cj s5cCsa1WjlNHhRPUA+ZD9mK4NKjvg5/OUgipWbOc7o3ouyOC+1EaQ/ZhnNlwQGVor1YsQcTzD LMdd589641hGRgaL8Phm5t+/vLrrZHyuzPnUiRyu82vIV7dzllRdl04pClhTCtJ5cGT7Hfm5x 3+H0p7AG06Vz3LOjKJTePcxfUVL6qTyu6IgRxapkc6VL1W3aeYKHxsxWAhR0R2dBP0Lb8JOiZ lgq5M2OuGI+i7Lxx9UsRyyuoYHOGanykCNsxkRA6Uf4Phtmm3gLsd5WC3hwMfEwnKsoL6J439 8wLD5JcjXJBKXVJ+7o2fyKD7+WnMXjaGijcQxFZ/2w7QjtGNznltp/fCgl6JG5jorOJxoAieO 3LiRcCg8+6rD06/ZjuDC684mdFscw88IY6rEkF6Eo74eES0RIdv3P2OLAn/11Eu9PZqW53tpJ mk+c432kAurESbzoeD1wpN0QPdJ7ZjZwBFiEuRq+D/5ouLgA7yjLoeqfzl/YPdpOip7hrI4eg An/PqSxUE9IVdVP3YMsGe+E+feJq6CH2XgxnKrlcIMyzgZKR6XQOqPkNEsdcXzs9iY1LqZtCG YBAZuTnLCz+c8QEkNqhq6H15tcEk/Jl0SD2gN4Y0jZwAeY+DYOBift3dRkPT1eIAygQpuqgVS 4FANe46 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2016 07:21:37 -0000 Thanks, Doug and Ben. Yes, null-mounting and using absolute path in the pkg add command helped. I found out that the packages directory can be arbitrary but their paths must be the same on the host and on the jail. Btw, I also use ezjail but I don't use ezjail-admin for updating ports because it uses portsnap which, on its turn, pulls in the head (no other option AFAIK). I prefer using a quarterly branch which I synchronize with svn. Hence this hassle :) -Alnis On 08/01/2016 01:40 AM, Ben Woods wrote: > On Sunday, 31 July 2016, Alnis Morics > wrote: > > Hi, > > I could successfully use "pkg -j 1 " many times to > install packages onto a jail. > > But now I had to change an option in a port, so I built a package > myself: > > portmaster -g www/apache22 > > The package and its dependency was stored to > /usr/ports/packages/All (as I set it in $PACKAGES): > > apache22-2.2.31_1.txz apr-1.5.2.1.5.4.txz > > I can now install these packages using pkg-add on the host, but > not onto the jail: > > test:/usr/ports/packages/All# pkg -j 1 add apache22-2.2.31_1.txz > apr-1.5.2.1.5.4.txz > pkg: apache22-2.2.31_1.txz: No such file or directory > pkg: Was 'pkg install apache22-2.2.31_1.txz' meant? > pkg: apr-1.5.2.1.5.4.txz: No such file or directory > pkg: Was 'pkg install apr-1.5.2.1.5.4.txz' meant? > > Failed to install the following 2 package(s): > apache22-2.2.31_1.txz, apr-1.5.2.1.5.4.txz > > If there is "No such file or directory", where does pkg look for > them? (I also tried to use full path; the result is the same) Or > is pkg-add an exception which doesn't work with -j option? > > -Alnis > > > It looks like the package you are trying to install is not in the > directory that pkg is running from within the jail. Either they are on > the host filesystem but not passed through to the jail, or pkg runs > from a different directory within the jail. > > If you have your host system ports directory nullfs mounted inside the > jail also, this might be fixed by specifying the absolute path of the > package. > > # pkg -j 1 add /usr/ports/packages/All/apache22-2.2.31_1.txz > /usr/ports/packages/All/apr-1.5.2.1.5.4.txz > > Check if your ports tree has the same directory inside the jail, and > contains these files. > > Good luck! > Ben > > > -- > > -- > From: Benjamin Woods > woodsb02@gmail.com From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Aug 1 08:55:05 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AFD1BAA10F for ; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 08:55:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from info@setit.rnu.tn) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46F971F29 for ; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 08:55:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from info@setit.rnu.tn) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 4256BBAA10E; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 08:55:05 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41DD5BAA10D for ; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 08:55:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from info@setit.rnu.tn) Received: from cckmail20.outgw.tn (cckmail20.outgw.tn [196.203.250.158]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 407741F28 for ; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 08:55:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from info@setit.rnu.tn) Received: from smtp.rnrt.tn (unknown [196.203.79.188]) by cckmail20.outgw.tn (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7404F2740768 for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2016 22:16:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp (smtp.rnu.tn [196.203.79.243]) by smtp.rnrt.tn (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCB9D60654 for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2016 21:15:57 +0100 (CET) Received: from [41.229.115.38] (unknown [41.229.115.38]) by smtp (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 8707E1FF124 for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2016 21:15:03 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: <6mppbxSTQdfMIX4xaITtkeCobWMMjKbnR2XDM16lru1L@setit.rnu.tn> From: info@setit.rnu.tn To: questions@freebsd.org Precedence: Bulk Subject: Joining the SC of the indexed IC SETIT 2016 Hammamet-Tunisia Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2016 21:15:07 +0100 X-Mailer: MBM 8.3.1-FR X-Bounce-Tracking-Info: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2016 08:55:05 -0000 From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Aug 1 09:57:10 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AD24BAA3D4 for ; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 09:57:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.2.117.100]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk", Issuer "infracaninophile.co.uk" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B9A51AF9 for ; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 09:57:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from ox-dell39.ox.adestra.com (unknown [85.199.232.226]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6084289DB for ; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 09:57:05 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk; dmarc=none header.from=infracaninophile.co.uk DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=201601-infracaninophile; t=1470045425; bh=6/fDqCowYgVZdaHvPMzzuk+/LZCl+Q5UdJnf+PbuN0g=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; z=Subject:=20Re:=20pkg-add=20for=20installing=20into=20a=20jail?|To :=20freebsd-questions@freebsd.org|References:=20<1997dd6e-1abd-4d4 f-e95b-0f4679543a16@mail.com>|From:=20Matthew=20Seaman=20|Date:=20Mon,=201=20Aug=202016=2010:56:59= 20+0100|In-Reply-To:=20<1997dd6e-1abd-4d4f-e95b-0f4679543a16@mail. com>; b=Xzc5Sja6r5x0tUPl6B7RIEserlHZEgCpQP1IpiZkMiKQhrIs9gnEfH1ILjW2KhsLS EslPeyBNrLlrPF09A/eIBSOOjb2wlZ1KbByWHDjVFWE0uQiS7LsRX3vUzU+OjEi3mx towExbwWSHhNV/J02CK/JkJVa2FG1JSSzGtU5hTo= Subject: Re: pkg-add for installing into a jail? To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <1997dd6e-1abd-4d4f-e95b-0f4679543a16@mail.com> From: Matthew Seaman Message-ID: Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2016 10:56:59 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1997dd6e-1abd-4d4f-e95b-0f4679543a16@mail.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="UODR1oodF5gPWQGCSUGOoMLtDvTsUcEia" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,RDNS_NONE,SPF_FAIL autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2016 09:57:10 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --UODR1oodF5gPWQGCSUGOoMLtDvTsUcEia Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="EWFmfMjiTW2UH2TuHrlW97F1vW9iERne7" From: Matthew Seaman To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: Subject: Re: pkg-add for installing into a jail? References: <1997dd6e-1abd-4d4f-e95b-0f4679543a16@mail.com> In-Reply-To: <1997dd6e-1abd-4d4f-e95b-0f4679543a16@mail.com> --EWFmfMjiTW2UH2TuHrlW97F1vW9iERne7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 07/31/16 10:38, Alnis Morics wrote: > test:/usr/ports/packages/All# pkg -j 1 add apache22-2.2.31_1.txz > apr-1.5.2.1.5.4.txz > pkg: apache22-2.2.31_1.txz: No such file or directory > pkg: Was 'pkg install apache22-2.2.31_1.txz' meant? > pkg: apr-1.5.2.1.5.4.txz: No such file or directory > pkg: Was 'pkg install apr-1.5.2.1.5.4.txz' meant? >=20 > Failed to install the following 2 package(s): apache22-2.2.31_1.txz, > apr-1.5.2.1.5.4.txz >=20 > If there is "No such file or directory", where does pkg look for them? > (I also tried to use full path; the result is the same) Or is pkg-add a= n > exception which doesn't work with -j option? pkg -j 1 something works by jexec'ing itself in the indicated jail first of all, and only then parsing the rest of the command line including opening any files listed there. Unless you have the apache22-2.2.31_1.txz package already available in the right location *inside* the jail you're going to get 'file not found'. It's the same deal with 'pkg -d /somewhere' except that uses chroot(2) rather than jail(2). Cheers, Matthew --EWFmfMjiTW2UH2TuHrlW97F1vW9iERne7-- --UODR1oodF5gPWQGCSUGOoMLtDvTsUcEia Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJXnxzrAAoJEABRPxDgqeTnS1QP/ApTHDNqbpeLu5mwd3nQux14 MgQjgdJHL/14mpAeWO1HlzPZ8YPMqY13u1T2bMgNyhYUe3BSPjIubr0dRiKAoJ40 uOP5T0YhdT92Zzs+rNWpzmg7h6BRQ4fCdKq1eH2ZQYaaGoHRCdhwDyBDSa1EdBcz 0AEigjuVjZj7CIUo5AY1Pv3BChNY/XVC8+01YAkzHfkUPqm/fO4K27hdL1zrALHQ rkzg+WnAi7EF8BAAMnqiIvDJ5sjpjlULLibGXiTqY4p/gx30p0QadKz7bbTcLjIf ZZiv52a8v0ABw2sSg868t9T0LI5sBy0rytfEU1/GFProRFhXRz7tnR42o7t/VPA7 bBaSTGC6cO/d13J1WGaQFGoF9DAYNP6aXQNqqflFDgVYI+vRRgAtC7sMvxpqOHJL mZacOwSu097KutQh9KxhO55H+MB01JJQPWtjdY7WbruzIJxw4secuGLVACInqixd vDWjwQQQadU4Y2nLGRAFGQolBlgMkt/cJxVDW0VufPNwxbzoe3gB4eGZhAIA+Tf2 mG+dlNBzqymTA/D9cP6MDrWLQtLzQSKy1t4No7USXsiM1Mphg6fzbZVMLQuOo1MS gH6Aruot5MGripMkJjbFdFCyo1xCa4r3r7j11QglN/y55z8rl2D3jJaOH4lbI8xP APZrmmaS4oNPzTv2Y7sQ =UbJU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --UODR1oodF5gPWQGCSUGOoMLtDvTsUcEia-- From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Aug 1 11:52:51 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BCE8BA3A47; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 11:52:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthias@petermann-it.de) Received: from d2ux.org (d2ux.org [5.9.151.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5683718F3; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 11:52:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthias@petermann-it.de) Received: from d2ux.org (unknown [10.0.0.4]) by d2ux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA1C322C487; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 13:47:23 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at d2ux.org Received: from d2ux.org ([10.0.0.4]) by d2ux.org (d2ux.org [10.0.0.4]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aKjNAshYPVHE; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 13:47:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: from x220.local (p54B7F63C.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.183.246.60]) by d2ux.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 447D922C482; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 13:47:23 +0200 (CEST) To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: "Matthias Petermann (Business)" Subject: emulators/virtualbox-ose build failure Message-ID: <7f7c15dd-4259-3037-0b20-15e9a5d2b206@petermann-it.de> Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2016 13:47:20 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2016 11:52:51 -0000 Hello, during the last build of my custom package repository I did experience a strange issue. I am using Synth, the build host is running FreeBSD 10.3/amd64. For the last build run, I receive an error: In file included from /construction/xports/emulators/virtualbox-ose/work/VirtualBox-5.0.26/src/= recompiler/cpu-exec.c:30: /construction/xports/emulators/virtualbox-ose/work/VirtualBox-5.0.26/src/= recompiler/target-i386/exec.h:41:30: error: global register variables are not supported register struct CPUX86State *env asm(AREG0); ^ (the full log is available in (1)). The closest I could find is stated in a posting from 2012 (2) where a similiar issue from seems to occur when Virtualbox is compiled with clang and not gcc. Not sure is this still applies today but Makefile seems still to refer --with-gcc. Some observations: * the build issue started when I included multimedia/kdenlive to the to-be-built port list * both ports (kdenlive and virtualbox-ose) share the Qt4 dependency * synth is building each port in a clean chroot, builds dependencies first and does a pkg install for them in the clean chroot where virtualbox-ose is built * kdenlive is built in order before virtualbox-ose, so Qt4 dependency build seems to be triggered from kdenlive Has anyone on this list an idea what is going wrong here? Thanks in advance & best regards, Matthias (1) https://dev.petermann-it.de/nextcloud/index.php/s/RpnDYYiyYSCjenb (2) http://osdir.com/ml/freebsd-emulation/2012-04/msg00108.html From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Aug 1 12:25:29 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A378BA70AC for ; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 12:25:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from decke@bluelife.at) Received: from mail-ua0-x229.google.com (mail-ua0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c08::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E230E11FA for ; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 12:25:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from decke@bluelife.at) Received: by mail-ua0-x229.google.com with SMTP id k90so104850409uak.0 for ; Mon, 01 Aug 2016 05:25:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bluelife.at; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=rSdlFyj9Tvr4rI8yWVsL9LVBubkvNYMVXrE8Gs9eAhE=; b=f59YHpomm3GWlauT7E2yN7CGu1q5wIlGGlr6lTVJPJPA0sS24WULXXPW0yKiv+0UDj F7VLTpr0epHFV1Dh2MGK/Df69jptEeouGtorbSSWf5yrx2MYFqqBQZsjavVbG7sa0/mS dsIFtt99aeoNwk34GTCgysdDVoUvIFyoVdwPg= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=rSdlFyj9Tvr4rI8yWVsL9LVBubkvNYMVXrE8Gs9eAhE=; b=AVh3Bf9QxokXEqlJ9c7kVA0eqI1zzL/mrjVpWDPuGXbW+6D2g9T/EjkbunDSh7LxfV DqA3DiSsi9LWo+ACKXujExTWxcz5g0GNK1VFcoteSPKYre/sUFaGLsdkHmQJfyEl9VbK QxiEmxhcwBLYEoGshjt/FsEQcvuF8D3zUhFvttSaSQ1stGIjeuTnJ7LhuTahSYfcHChZ 1+AJe4p1VzNzCjVtf7C3y3jx7ElAF5LGvd3qaGwFqNQJSGMD0e1X/iSiQIrJWZlia9Nv 0/w9oEao0RwJ0MEJfnnuKlF8pUhCdZTgNI0oAriqN083EwYNhO7sLqGiCQfUqeSG++KY 902g== X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoouuo/MUiTpF5a8DhhBs6up+V+vv8ejuBiPofCK/1YqBTcZNxfm8yUJ7X4dEZjLY/kxeuC8wpolcIgCs3yQ== X-Received: by 10.159.36.15 with SMTP id 15mr21386795uaq.79.1470054327599; Mon, 01 Aug 2016 05:25:27 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.159.55.169 with HTTP; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 05:25:27 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [2001:470:701f::1] In-Reply-To: <7f7c15dd-4259-3037-0b20-15e9a5d2b206@petermann-it.de> References: <7f7c15dd-4259-3037-0b20-15e9a5d2b206@petermann-it.de> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Bernhard_Fr=C3=B6hlich?= Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2016 14:25:27 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: emulators/virtualbox-ose build failure To: "Matthias Petermann (Business)" Cc: ports , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2016 12:25:29 -0000 On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 1:47 PM, Matthias Petermann (Business) wrote: > Hello, > > during the last build of my custom package repository I did experience a > strange issue. I am using Synth, the build host is running FreeBSD > 10.3/amd64. For the last build run, I receive an error: > > In file included from > /construction/xports/emulators/virtualbox-ose/work/VirtualBox-5.0.26/src/= recompiler/cpu-exec.c:30: > /construction/xports/emulators/virtualbox-ose/work/VirtualBox-5.0.26/src/= recompiler/target-i386/exec.h:41:30: > error: global register variables are not supported > register struct CPUX86State *env asm(AREG0); > ^ > (the full log is available in (1)). The closest I could find is stated > in a posting from 2012 (2) where a similiar issue from seems to occur > when Virtualbox is compiled with clang and not gcc. Not sure is this > still applies today but Makefile seems still to refer --with-gcc. > > Some observations: > * the build issue started when I included multimedia/kdenlive to the > to-be-built port list > * both ports (kdenlive and virtualbox-ose) share the Qt4 dependency > * synth is building each port in a clean chroot, builds dependencies > first and does a pkg install for them in the clean chroot where > virtualbox-ose is built > * kdenlive is built in order before virtualbox-ose, so Qt4 dependency > build seems to be triggered from kdenlive > > Has anyone on this list an idea what is going wrong here? > > Thanks in advance & best regards, > Matthias > > > (1) https://dev.petermann-it.de/nextcloud/index.php/s/RpnDYYiyYSCjenb > (2) http://osdir.com/ml/freebsd-emulation/2012-04/msg00108.html The automated FreeBSD package building with poudriere produced the same err= or last night for FreeBSD 10.3. Since about a year the port uses a mixture of clang and gcc because clang d= oes not support global register variables. On the other side building all ports with clang but only vbox with gcc created issues in KDE. The result are a couple of patches from jkim which are not supported at all but use both compilers in a mix. Might be they need to be fixed after the update to vbox 5.0. --=20 Bernhard Fr=C3=B6hlich http://www.bluelife.at/ From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Aug 1 17:27:34 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05E16BAB872 for ; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 17:27:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nishu@DYNAMICAPPS.IN) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C742B1D01 for ; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 17:27:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nishu@DYNAMICAPPS.IN) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id C2C07BAB871; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 17:27:33 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2543BAB870 for ; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 17:27:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nishu@DYNAMICAPPS.IN) Received: from IND01-BO1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bo1ind01on0086.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.101.86]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.protection.outlook.com", Issuer "Microsoft IT SSL SHA2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E5B6A1CFF for ; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 17:27:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nishu@DYNAMICAPPS.IN) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lacchu.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-DYNAMICAPPS-IN; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=aUhnibPfdT913u48i2IgQGjDraxEbvkoiJ41k9bYUBU=; b=XXlWoGDqZTLSu6FEr7eQdoxTvjknioSZkDVy1EiRf6lviRTJvLg6m1BSjVEb/YS68ykIRNdKqQ6PvShHEKbQncvvIDqa8R3AadkhOSGsSH/M6f0oOtqqsZlKmn+2dY2hmQdEY/kVTQflFypPcZLb0rmZREDd0n2xwRI3Ex9M5iM= Received: from BM1PR01MB0561.INDPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (10.164.132.12) by BM1PR01MB0564.INDPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (10.164.132.15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.1.549.15; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 11:38:05 +0000 Received: from BM1PR01MB0561.INDPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM ([10.164.132.12]) by BM1PR01MB0561.INDPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM ([10.164.132.12]) with mapi id 15.01.0549.022; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 11:38:04 +0000 From: nishu To: "questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Android Apps Thread-Topic: Android Apps Thread-Index: AdHr57mNkFqLniRMSvO4NucbtmzzFg== Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2016 11:31:33 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=nishu@DYNAMICAPPS.IN; x-originating-ip: [125.63.64.245] x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 328b56f9-14b3-41d8-f53b-08d3ba004ce1 x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BM1PR01MB0564; 6:q+Cg0YwbeGBH+3fjR1K5wvzgku0YAJdti/pr9dUg4coCoT3MxSfen6lOnT9HAc+d2SERJaJJHi0O5Gxpxj03NBDz8CZPGalg9hq7kcz9KNuBkKbOBML1CWfh++3+CDSgL41Dx1MWP1/6QLLM4GtrbSOHqTmhZpq3ZYrpEk7TW/6t41vHg5rMDWIFWo9W9XVk0I7NDAnFmalxvd2ddTnMaZFwFwBI1WaOXY8g4R1Fkfb+xoAl+UIqw1ZKKEmOXJEQc7iDm6M33BCkItMDnzS/BhIsMCBoy47cpxfVBw6kLu9jMW9hFoYecUwCXa4FlnOl; 5:CsKEfYtQ+fm3taYkliyikmP5v8ZQsgV64ykMBNWdP2R2TGMaOkr7jXr6tFpyM+SemQqBl5BDeTNAO6/3kowJqsSSjdREJj4CWMnGT4uWNULc+/puw1jdJKg9CmF3af/mchvpHumEsB8hJZ7028FJMg==; 24:rqDvqu9wJbcG0BtVTG1A/Y50AIycHrKuyBdoggVGc4EvyQlHfbKyTH+x0HRbfRNmXjobJE7SxWeidcmXFvMNrRP1OEuLr8yJWfj6JmCzMv0=; 7:u3G3WBpURydOcVHynu5Jne0pVIBXke6vzeWZ85TNCgpWsYe4jhIgDvgbMX4aMN42gKR5XozpL32epgguJze+n8vxoYY6N63LYHgg36SKcYYDs/HkXTr1q+XA+JGwp//vc3Ifrki61hkQ0Rgg2XIBgd4VRxGVACsQ/JEtTmXRV2XSd/w9aDw8j3sK50HjMGaBZ7Kyq6poGmKOv9DXTz+CcjhQi2ZAEOgjAlcWtpozkZEtT6/VkP2bqKwETeAplMUR x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BM1PR01MB0564; x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(278428928389397)(21748063052155); x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(6040130)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(10201501046)(3002001)(6041072)(6043046); SRVR:BM1PR01MB0564; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BM1PR01MB0564; x-forefront-prvs: 0021920B5A x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(6009001)(7916002)(199003)(189002)(189998001)(107886002)(110136002)(97736004)(229853001)(9326002)(33656002)(92566002)(16236675004)(790700001)(105586002)(9686002)(7736002)(1730700003)(81166006)(81156014)(101416001)(8676002)(74316002)(7696003)(7846002)(5640700001)(19625215002)(5630700001)(3480700004)(2501003)(19580395003)(74482002)(68736007)(450100001)(54356999)(5002640100001)(3280700002)(50986999)(122556002)(8936002)(15975445007)(19300405004)(87936001)(2906002)(77096005)(221733001)(66066001)(10400500002)(2900100001)(102836003)(2351001)(106356001)(86152002)(586003)(86362001)(6116002)(3846002)(3660700001)(489414006)(80872002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:BM1PR01MB0564; H:BM1PR01MB0561.INDPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en; received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: DYNAMICAPPS.IN does not designate permitted sender hosts) spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99 spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: DYNAMICAPPS.IN X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 01 Aug 2016 11:31:33.3909 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: befea343-10f3-41c5-a7bc-f834a1dec420 X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BM1PR01MB0564 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2016 17:27:34 -0000 Hi, We are an Indian based Mobile Apps Development firm with over 8 years of ex= perience. We can design and develop Mobile app to help you deliver more value to cust= omers in your specific industry. We are focused in three mobile application Platforms: * iPhone / iPad application development * Android application development * Windows Mobile (WM) application development Our mobile application services include: * Business software and solutions for iPhone, iPad, Android, and WM * Productivity apps, utilities and solutions * Mobile client software * Porting web applications to mobile apps in different platforms Please get back to us to know with your Queries, Requirement & best quote i= n case you are interested. I'm waiting for your reply. Warm Regards, Nishu Singh P.S: - Though this is not an automated email, we keep on sending out these = emails to all those people whom we find eligible of using our services. To = unsubscribe from future mails (i.e., to ensure that we do not contact you a= gain for this matter), please send a blank mail to email with NO as Subject= . From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Aug 1 18:42:02 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E02FCBABDEB for ; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 18:42:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: from ms-10.1blu.de (ms-10.1blu.de [178.254.4.101]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A5B911CE8 for ; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 18:42:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: from [82.113.106.134] (helo=localhost.unixarea.de) by ms-10.1blu.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1bUI9x-0008Ld-Ob for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 01 Aug 2016 20:41:54 +0200 Received: from localhost.my.domain (c720-r292778-amd64 [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.unixarea.de (8.15.2/8.14.9) with ESMTPS id u71IfqBB001995 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 20:41:52 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: (from guru@localhost) by localhost.my.domain (8.15.2/8.14.9/Submit) id u71Ifq6W001994 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 20:41:52 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) X-Authentication-Warning: localhost.my.domain: guru set sender to guru@unixarea.de using -f Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2016 20:41:52 +0200 From: Matthias Apitz To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: can not connect to www.freebsd.org or IP addr 8.8.178.110 port 80 Message-ID: <20160801184152.GA1932@c720-r292778-amd64> Reply-To: Matthias Apitz Mail-Followup-To: Matthias Apitz , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT r292778 (amd64) User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-Con-Id: 51246 X-Con-U: 0-guru X-Originating-IP: 82.113.106.134 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2016 18:42:03 -0000 Hello, I have some FreeBSD CURRENT netbooks and one Ubuntu in my WLAN, the WAN IP addr is 88.217.112.246 (as shown by http://myip.nl/ ) none of the WLAN workstations can reach www.freebsd.org at port 80; the command telnet www.freebsd.org 80 shows resolving to the IP addr 8.8.178.110, but does not connect; a tcpdump shows only SYN pkg going out to 8.8.178.110 but no SYN answer is coming in. This is as far as I can see the only side which is not reachable, all other port 80, 443 and SSH 22 to anywhere is just fine; Any ideas what could be wrong? I'm afraid, when I contact my ISP (a German local telephone provider) they will ask me if I have the latest Win7 patch installed ... :-) matthias -- Matthias Apitz, ✉ guru@unixarea.de, ⌂ http://www.unixarea.de/ ☎ +49-176-38902045 "Wer übersieht, dass wir uns den anderen weggenommen haben und sie uns wiederhaben wollen, kann von den Kämpfen der letzten Tage keinen verstehen. Und kann natürlich auch keinen dieser Kämpfe bestehen." Hermann Kant in jW 1.10.1989 From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Aug 1 18:47:50 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10A90BABFAA for ; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 18:47:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joerg.preiss@slesa.de) Received: from mout.kundenserver.de (mout.kundenserver.de [212.227.17.24]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mout.kundenserver.de", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 75A7E1EF5 for ; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 18:47:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joerg.preiss@slesa.de) Received: from Aubas-Macbook.local ([86.204.113.148]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue103) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0Lm6Wf-1augNv1uuP-00ZfYi for ; Mon, 01 Aug 2016 20:47:46 +0200 Subject: Re: can not connect to www.freebsd.org or IP addr 8.8.178.110 port 80 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20160801184152.GA1932@c720-r292778-amd64> From: =?UTF-8?B?SsO2cmcgUHJlacOf?= Message-ID: <4ef37e23-2c36-cf5c-a431-c5dafbbdc84f@slesa.de> Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2016 20:47:41 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160801184152.GA1932@c720-r292778-amd64> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="4G637EqS8ri5mbvpeK2HwMpAJMQBkwcxM" X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:pri/VQUq4PSjfKOFBpQdAjshp6BVCvXQ9eTsBrjLxd9vx2gQldV ZjfdEkxhrMfTCXVK7i0JNqy9DbQ66+m8ElnXhjC2W1ZJksVVqCHJUGQsVlw5Uiy0AyBHXA3 CbxzBI877AakIzF2T/Yz5ge6E81WRRoLAUGvs2C74Jd3Q+5ZNGYvszP1Zq70MbbRQJMQhfn TOYUgPe/DiL9RrOUvYnLQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:a7ZjY2EY0gQ=:NgUPa7CE9GIBGfhCCtlsW7 tXkGDJDgGwConn/YyyZtQAiGwFOqzFSp/UyzaAwsNCL5hGVtnjszxg1/JU2EcqnDTi4nIbAzJ HVrvF6QW1WKnhjqQUriBluEMK3x1lZmnolgimRJlJU8vTI5RXzcJYSKrARPbZk9jzltdf2tuJ 0R5fV4TwBk/MgH0QZ/hrE4r1acVFEXK1w1OS5QduLlUA+evAT4J0kOHGzbklgwz9ZcP79rYTn W+874W5wXmqFIFza+qzw/lEQ6xESeEl3yFvzo5cszGlBJ/CHcbVUiUF6dWfMu0nm3honKngEo FEkSryUubXmyzqs5ZMQKUEkq7Zy+O4htPyUNe9GlgkCC/orpIfxfGFlVmRNVbAKC7HpALrIVC ut0EDjn4rsA9wu10ZVLl6XAUFzjxmAZZc/7qw0XIvNlltC4+kHb1vt6yunOkfpEKaxC3tfHzj vMWcATY/0cwEmAs9gHdJ1FViCvvuBJ5PYwXAk/mByeBJu7yaFfgiMzx7R1l1/av7W2++0DxKP Eg/pbMhDI2H4fLpM9WEvibfkoBaTakqVRfG7XWtZSwTYYrMC+TREgt7rzcFf+bd4ickU79kDZ L/g19xz+jQeOG+xbdnx+1/kFE7ENjSH4npMq51E/neSgVW/GpPCSY5BdI06LovV3aNX1baom8 VWP2ObD9Z7qcLX7A9bMYF65CkezJOCnjSSV1kX4NrAXWki+jYZnhB+RPqsgSTSomzjko= X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 01 Aug 2016 19:36:08 +0000 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2016 18:47:50 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --4G637EqS8ri5mbvpeK2HwMpAJMQBkwcxM Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="qsP1ASj1UDSUdDS3OoUWwKES8a8OPfLdQ" From: =?UTF-8?B?SsO2cmcgUHJlacOf?= To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <4ef37e23-2c36-cf5c-a431-c5dafbbdc84f@slesa.de> Subject: Re: can not connect to www.freebsd.org or IP addr 8.8.178.110 port 80 References: <20160801184152.GA1932@c720-r292778-amd64> In-Reply-To: <20160801184152.GA1932@c720-r292778-amd64> --qsP1ASj1UDSUdDS3OoUWwKES8a8OPfLdQ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, we had a lot of problems accessing forums.freebsd.org and other pages. The point there was, that we were blacklisted somehow. With forums itself, the admin told us, we would have sent some some SMB packages to the site. On another page, it was a mail blacklisting service which prevented us from accessing https pages. I still don't know how that works. hth J=C3=B6rg Am 01.08.16 um 20:41 schrieb Matthias Apitz: >=20 > Hello, >=20 > I have some FreeBSD CURRENT netbooks and one Ubuntu in my WLAN, the WAN= > IP addr is 88.217.112.246 (as shown by http://myip.nl/ ) >=20 > none of the WLAN workstations can reach www.freebsd.org at port 80; > the command >=20 > telnet www.freebsd.org 80 >=20 > shows resolving to the IP addr 8.8.178.110, but does not connect; a > tcpdump shows only SYN pkg going out to 8.8.178.110 but no SYN answer > is coming in. This is as far as I can see the only side which is not > reachable, all other port 80, 443 and SSH 22 to anywhere is just fine; >=20 > Any ideas what could be wrong? I'm afraid, when I contact my ISP (a > German local telephone provider) they will ask me if I have the latest > Win7 patch installed ... :-) >=20 > matthias >=20 --qsP1ASj1UDSUdDS3OoUWwKES8a8OPfLdQ-- --4G637EqS8ri5mbvpeK2HwMpAJMQBkwcxM Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJXn5lTAAoJEKwOgNn9tqKhPbwH/iukcv3BJxRg2luXmX3/qYNP zeAK3rbOWsR3iSNoafhd8BX3iiFfIDAk55cpe+fyDLORZgSKeHPTXjuFTw0aBABF M+r3Hvskk2eAH3uUGsfmkE+j//YJFnzep8LS9NWV+Ev2/KqpB24h89sTnI+b5IkW PTwsXCXQhYMiQkEjtbBa00VOhy7y/s/d1J+Z28qA8yNIYYgmizs03drDn9YAuobA KYsCehXsAs++2ewJxC20y5Xm2/c5TpmJsQkuuu8sK0YtVLmrpDWPzTNIpvUR2Vfp 32I4zaUmRhVN4wTR+lQVbeFM8vOFP/TQ82yx2j6jBCvrHetV4jGoaCiICCkq0H4= =1fLZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --4G637EqS8ri5mbvpeK2HwMpAJMQBkwcxM-- From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Aug 1 19:44:31 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22BD5BAB6E9 for ; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 19:44:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cary@SDF.org) Received: from cdptpa-oedge-vip.email.rr.com (cdptpa-outbound-snat.email.rr.com [107.14.166.230]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E31841C3B for ; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 19:44:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cary@SDF.org) Received: from [67.49.10.59] ([67.49.10.59:43586] helo=bsdfull.Belkin) by cdptpa-oedge01 (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 3.5.0.35861 r(Momo-dev:tip)) with ESMTP id 44/20-12092-2E4AF975; Mon, 01 Aug 2016 19:37:06 +0000 Subject: Re: can not connect to www.freebsd.org or IP addr 8.8.178.110 port 80 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20160801184152.GA1932@c720-r292778-amd64> From: Cary Message-ID: <579FA4CF.1090509@SDF.org> Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2016 12:36:47 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:42.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/42.0 SeaMonkey/2.39 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160801184152.GA1932@c720-r292778-amd64> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-RR-Connecting-IP: 107.14.168.118:25 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2016 19:44:31 -0000 Matthias Apitz wrote: > > Hello, > > I have some FreeBSD CURRENT netbooks and one Ubuntu in my WLAN, the WAN IP > addr is 88.217.112.246 (as shown by http://myip.nl/ ) > > none of the WLAN workstations can reach www.freebsd.org at port 80; the > command > > telnet www.freebsd.org 80 > > shows resolving to the IP addr 8.8.178.110, but does not connect; a tcpdump > shows only SYN pkg going out to 8.8.178.110 but no SYN answer is coming in. > This is as far as I can see the only side which is not reachable, all other > port 80, 443 and SSH 22 to anywhere is just fine; > > Any ideas what could be wrong? I'm afraid, when I contact my ISP (a German > local telephone provider) they will ask me if I have the latest Win7 patch > installed ... :-) > > matthias > hello Matthias, Today I also noticed, just after fetching ports with portsnap(8) , that 8.8.178.110 wasn't responding. It is back now afaict. Cary -- cary@sdf.org SDF Public Access UNIX System - http://sdf.org ------------------------------ From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Aug 1 19:53:53 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30290BABC0B for ; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 19:53:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: from ms-10.1blu.de (ms-10.1blu.de [178.254.4.101]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E93AC1B1A for ; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 19:53:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: from [82.113.106.134] (helo=localhost.unixarea.de) by ms-10.1blu.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1bUJHY-0001NS-CH; Mon, 01 Aug 2016 21:53:48 +0200 Received: from localhost.my.domain (c720-r292778-amd64 [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.unixarea.de (8.15.2/8.14.9) with ESMTPS id u71Jrifm002612 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 1 Aug 2016 21:53:44 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: (from guru@localhost) by localhost.my.domain (8.15.2/8.14.9/Submit) id u71JriFj002611; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 21:53:44 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) X-Authentication-Warning: localhost.my.domain: guru set sender to guru@unixarea.de using -f Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2016 21:53:44 +0200 From: Matthias Apitz To: Cary Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: can not connect to www.freebsd.org or IP addr 8.8.178.110 port 80 Message-ID: <20160801195344.GA2455@c720-r292778-amd64> Reply-To: Matthias Apitz Mail-Followup-To: Matthias Apitz , Cary , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20160801184152.GA1932@c720-r292778-amd64> <579FA4CF.1090509@SDF.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <579FA4CF.1090509@SDF.org> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT r292778 (amd64) User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-Con-Id: 51246 X-Con-U: 0-guru X-Originating-IP: 82.113.106.134 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2016 19:53:53 -0000 El día Monday, August 01, 2016 a las 12:36:47PM -0700, Cary escribió: > > none of the WLAN workstations can reach www.freebsd.org at port 80; the > > command > > > > telnet www.freebsd.org 80 > > > > shows resolving to the IP addr 8.8.178.110, but does not connect; a tcpdump > > shows only SYN pkg going out to 8.8.178.110 but no SYN answer is coming in. > > This is as far as I can see the only side which is not reachable, all other > > port 80, 443 and SSH 22 to anywhere is just fine; > > > > Any ideas what could be wrong? I'm afraid, when I contact my ISP (a German > > local telephone provider) they will ask me if I have the latest Win7 patch > > installed ... :-) > > > > matthias > > > hello Matthias, > > Today I also noticed, just after fetching ports with portsnap(8) , > that 8.8.178.110 wasn't responding. It is back now afaict. To make this clear: I was able at the same time to reach the IP addr 8.8.178.110 from other points (for example from my mobile phone), but not from my WAN addr 88.217.112.246; and I do not have a firewall block for port 80 for FreeBSD.org; the only options I can think off are a) a routing issue from 88.217.112.246 to 8.8.178.110 b) a block in FreeBSD.org based on the source addr 88.217.112.246 matthias -- Matthias Apitz, ✉ guru@unixarea.de, ⌂ http://www.unixarea.de/ ☎ +49-176-38902045 "Wer übersieht, dass wir uns den anderen weggenommen haben und sie uns wiederhaben wollen, kann von den Kämpfen der letzten Tage keinen verstehen. Und kann natürlich auch keinen dieser Kämpfe bestehen." Hermann Kant in jW 1.10.1989 From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Aug 1 19:30:47 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBFCBBABE88 for ; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 19:30:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eduardo.lemosdesa@gmail.com) Received: from mail-oi0-x22d.google.com (mail-oi0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B02C51B27 for ; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 19:30:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eduardo.lemosdesa@gmail.com) Received: by mail-oi0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id j185so206222471oih.0 for ; Mon, 01 Aug 2016 12:30:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=SoOg/B7LLOJfo+yePnxqrwd+ijZKqPi56nI0Jfef9Vg=; b=Paf+eK7KJ1xsJCotds3fQy9aRHkdNp02hO8xPzyQS9f9UWbjKmSh1PTPTZg09YQtY+ ZoK+RyvGiPcp4bkVfxmZ5Aqhv0HTWQ+eCszDSkSznp2JHCJfSt0R4OsMjnk22ZTkJn0J jtT+IaHfGRdQqahN2LHc7MX/KKHKSR9HH3dvvAv1EQBrUhrTsuc2uS550Mih0wmAykQ6 /EEfoK5JK1YmoHaciI9cShd/tj/NdQuY4PrJItlxYijFk4Py9VgpnBnPBr50AGS+AL/q 6w0wljNQy7Fx9zoGL428BKA8qPuUwjPeRyfQsdfF92W24iFRd+tvVawpC1jLC5XbYo0U jfTw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=SoOg/B7LLOJfo+yePnxqrwd+ijZKqPi56nI0Jfef9Vg=; b=cGHHvYtxNPsznxhplQHRwYq5faIOzShkMa1ctnmJE4S5YnmLymLSY+ncqZkrgcHyPc oo9YLNwDhywacMpcQREy6lTjALL77EFgaCf165OXO4dxaQ/JQ69uUa6hzcUgu56f4jls F8jnA0vh7YbpMC6KZSWsTrLEacY0K9pD2wp/sbi50h8cNgXwiTO5NluHtiPz6hsSoc/p mTw/IGLMDpJI6OEwF4jEdn9Y3ZfDx+p8ro1WyHiw7kQ8khQaRe+wnd0iw275THNX2rW8 RmuuJRdD9FUV/uZ1VPko0G3pPHUbGGHA48gg4XXoe1iTsZH+ldw5lssTDejSlZo4pgGq NR3Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoouu4wZh3/VE1FCvHT7yFuwMAksyi4hYL39OzBdV5+/qm5hnNRZHwAH22t7wpsNK0U578kfHRUfIhf0qKZQ== X-Received: by 10.157.32.234 with SMTP id x97mr4373168ota.75.1470079846910; Mon, 01 Aug 2016 12:30:46 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.29.196 with HTTP; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 12:30:46 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20160801184152.GA1932@c720-r292778-amd64> References: <20160801184152.GA1932@c720-r292778-amd64> From: Eduardo Lemos de Sa Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2016 16:30:46 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: can not connect to www.freebsd.org or IP addr 8.8.178.110 port 80 To: Matthias Apitz , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 01 Aug 2016 19:57:55 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2016 19:30:48 -0000 Dear Matthias On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 3:41 PM, Matthias Apitz wrote: > > Hello, > > I have some FreeBSD CURRENT netbooks and one Ubuntu in my WLAN, the WAN > IP addr is 88.217.112.246 (as shown by http://myip.nl/ ) > > none of the WLAN workstations can reach www.freebsd.org at port 80; > the command > > telnet www.freebsd.org 80 > > shows resolving to the IP addr 8.8.178.110, but does not connect; a > tcpdump shows only SYN pkg going out to 8.8.178.110 but no SYN answer > is coming in. This is as far as I can see the only side which is not > reachable, all other port 80, 443 and SSH 22 to anywhere is just fine; > > Any ideas what could be wrong? I'm afraid, when I contact my ISP (a > German local telephone provider) they will ask me if I have the latest > Win7 patch installed ... :-) > > matthias > -- > Matthias Apitz, =E2=9C=89 guru@unixarea.de, =E2=8C=82 http://www.unixarea= .de/ =E2=98=8E > +49-176-38902045 > "Wer =C3=BCbersieht, dass wir uns den anderen weggenommen haben und sie u= ns > wiederhaben wollen, > kann von den K=C3=A4mpfen der letzten Tage keinen verstehen. Und kann nat= =C3=BCrlich > auch keinen > dieser K=C3=A4mpfe bestehen." Hermann Kant in jW 1.10.1989 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" I had the same problem last week, despite for all friends in Brazil was everything ok. Some conclusions: 1) yes, the IP address is 8.8.178.110 (so, your DNS is ok) 2) Try http://isup.me/www.freebsd.org , so that you can check if the site is working, or 3) http://www.isptools.com.br/caiu#www.freebsd.org , so that you can test from which places are able to connect Of course, the last one is on Brazil, but it is a test to be done I didn't was able to solve the problem by myself. Someone, on my network (I was on job) heard my complains and fixed it. My conclusion was that is was caused by some bad configured firewall (ping was working, but not http). Cheers Eduardo --=20 Eduardo Lemos de Sa Associated Professor Level 4 Dep. Quimica da Universidade Federal do Paran=C3=A1 fone: +55(41)3361-3300 fax: +55(41)3361-3186 From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Aug 1 20:17:46 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8DF6BAA8B1 for ; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 20:17:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cary@SDF.org) Received: from cdptpa-oedge-vip.email.rr.com (cdptpa-outbound-snat.email.rr.com [107.14.166.227]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9387311AE for ; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 20:17:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cary@SDF.org) Received: from [67.49.10.59] ([67.49.10.59:33998] helo=bsdfull.Belkin) by cdptpa-oedge02 (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 3.5.0.35861 r(Momo-dev:tip)) with ESMTP id 99/73-21360-62EAF975; Mon, 01 Aug 2016 20:16:39 +0000 Subject: Re: can not connect to www.freebsd.org or IP addr 8.8.178.110 port 80 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20160801184152.GA1932@c720-r292778-amd64> <579FA4CF.1090509@SDF.org> <20160801195344.GA2455@c720-r292778-amd64> From: Cary Message-ID: <579FAE1E.9070205@SDF.org> Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2016 13:16:30 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:42.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/42.0 SeaMonkey/2.39 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160801195344.GA2455@c720-r292778-amd64> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-RR-Connecting-IP: 107.14.168.130:25 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2016 20:17:46 -0000 Matthias Apitz wrote: > El día Monday, August 01, 2016 a las 12:36:47PM -0700, Cary escribió: > >>> none of the WLAN workstations can reach www.freebsd.org at port 80; the >>> command >>> >>> telnet www.freebsd.org 80 >>> >>> shows resolving to the IP addr 8.8.178.110, but does not connect; a tcpdump >>> shows only SYN pkg going out to 8.8.178.110 but no SYN answer is coming in. >>> This is as far as I can see the only side which is not reachable, all other >>> port 80, 443 and SSH 22 to anywhere is just fine; >>> >>> Any ideas what could be wrong? I'm afraid, when I contact my ISP (a German >>> local telephone provider) they will ask me if I have the latest Win7 patch >>> installed ... :-) >>> >>> matthias >>> >> hello Matthias, >> >> Today I also noticed, just after fetching ports with portsnap(8) , >> that 8.8.178.110 wasn't responding. It is back now afaict. > > To make this clear: I was able at the same time to reach the IP > addr 8.8.178.110 from other points (for example from my mobile phone), > but not from my WAN addr 88.217.112.246; and I do not have a firewall > block for port 80 for FreeBSD.org; the only options I can think off are > > a) a routing issue from 88.217.112.246 to 8.8.178.110 > b) a block in FreeBSD.org based on the source addr 88.217.112.246 > > matthias > portsdb(1) failed for me, and after checking with ping(8) there was no response trying to reach the same ip from my ISP in California. -- cary@sdf.org SDF Public Access UNIX System - http://sdf.org ------------------------------ From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Aug 2 00:08:28 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 759D8BA2090 for ; Tue, 2 Aug 2016 00:08:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tundra@tundraware.com) Received: from oceanview.tundraware.com (oceanview.tundraware.com [45.55.60.57]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "oceanview.tundraware.com", Issuer "oceanview.tundraware.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 338C81BEF for ; Tue, 2 Aug 2016 00:08:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tundra@tundraware.com) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (ozzie.tundraware.com [75.145.138.73]) (authenticated bits=0) by oceanview.tundraware.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id u7207sFM096662 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 19:07:55 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from tundra@tundraware.com) To: FreeBSD Mailing List From: Tim Daneliuk Subject: thumbnail_index Message-ID: <879b33bb-bcfa-7941-f638-5cba0eb741ce@tundraware.com> Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2016 19:07:49 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (oceanview.tundraware.com [45.55.60.57]); Mon, 01 Aug 2016 19:07:55 -0500 (CDT) X-TundraWare-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-TundraWare-MailScanner-ID: u7207sFM096662 X-TundraWare-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-TundraWare-MailScanner-From: tundra@tundraware.com X-Spam-Status: No Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2016 00:08:28 -0000 Is there a more modern tool available that does what thumbnail_index does (from a command line)? -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Tim Daneliuk tundra@tundraware.com PGP Key: http://www.tundraware.com/PGP/ From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Aug 2 05:36:46 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A1D7BAC888 for ; Tue, 2 Aug 2016 05:36:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: from ms-10.1blu.de (ms-10.1blu.de [178.254.4.101]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F1F381BF5 for ; Tue, 2 Aug 2016 05:36:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: from [89.204.138.70] (helo=localhost.unixarea.de) by ms-10.1blu.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1bUSNR-0005Hi-NC; Tue, 02 Aug 2016 07:36:30 +0200 Received: from localhost.my.domain (c720-r292778-amd64 [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.unixarea.de (8.15.2/8.14.9) with ESMTPS id u725aQwG002261 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 2 Aug 2016 07:36:26 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: (from guru@localhost) by localhost.my.domain (8.15.2/8.14.9/Submit) id u725aNGN002260; Tue, 2 Aug 2016 07:36:23 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) X-Authentication-Warning: localhost.my.domain: guru set sender to guru@unixarea.de using -f Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 07:36:23 +0200 From: Matthias Apitz To: Ian Smith , Warren Block , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: no beep any more Message-ID: <20160802053623.GA2187@c720-r292778-amd64> Reply-To: Matthias Apitz Mail-Followup-To: Matthias Apitz , Ian Smith , Warren Block , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20160728223053.A29054@sola.nimnet.asn.au> <20160728142521.GA1932@c720-r292778-amd64> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20160728142521.GA1932@c720-r292778-amd64> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT r292778 (amd64) User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-Con-Id: 51246 X-Con-U: 0-guru X-Originating-IP: 89.204.138.70 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2016 05:36:46 -0000 El día Thursday, July 28, 2016 a las 04:25:21PM +0200, Matthias Apitz escribió: > > > > Usually the hardware for these in laptops is a simple piezo speaker, > > > > commonly with red and blue wires, likely driven by a single TTL or CMOS > > > > buffer. While piezo speakers are pretty hard (but not impossible) to > > > > destroy, I've had a laptop where one wire has become detached, so if > > > > it's not too hard to get in there to check, that may be worthwhile .. if > > > > so it's likely a simple fix, either by soldering or replacement. > > > > > > > > ... I have had a chat in some forum about Chromebooks. The people there are not willing to help further because "...we only support plain vanilla ChromeOS at this forum." Full thread here: https://productforums.google.com/forum/#!topic/chromebook-central/-MXyMACfcCU;context-place=forum/chromebook-central At least someone pointed out that these devices only have stereo audio speakers (which do fine in my case) and no other "pc speaker" on motherboard. As the speakers do fine, this must be some problem in our FreeBSD kernel / audio driver, not sending the printf '\7' to the audio device. matthias -- Matthias Apitz, ✉ guru@unixarea.de, ⌂ http://www.unixarea.de/ ☎ +49-176-38902045 "Wer übersieht, dass wir uns den anderen weggenommen haben und sie uns wiederhaben wollen, kann von den Kämpfen der letzten Tage keinen verstehen. Und kann natürlich auch keinen dieser Kämpfe bestehen." Hermann Kant in jW 1.10.1989 From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Aug 2 07:42:24 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FFFFBAC521; Tue, 2 Aug 2016 07:42:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthias@petermann-it.de) Received: from d2ux.org (d2ux.org [5.9.151.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A60DA1705; Tue, 2 Aug 2016 07:42:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthias@petermann-it.de) Received: from d2ux.org (unknown [10.0.0.4]) by d2ux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C80C66D20; Tue, 2 Aug 2016 09:42:21 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at d2ux.org Received: from d2ux.org ([10.0.0.4]) by d2ux.org (d2ux.org [10.0.0.4]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id S9VNmiCHGMT0; Tue, 2 Aug 2016 09:42:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: from x220.local (p54B7F63C.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.183.246.60]) by d2ux.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E964766D1B; Tue, 2 Aug 2016 09:42:20 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: emulators/virtualbox-ose build failure To: =?UTF-8?Q?Bernhard_Fr=c3=b6hlich?= References: <7f7c15dd-4259-3037-0b20-15e9a5d2b206@petermann-it.de> Cc: ports , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: "Matthias Petermann (Business)" Message-ID: Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 09:42:17 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2016 07:42:24 -0000 Hello Bernhard, On 01.08.2016 14:25, Bernhard Fröhlich wrote: > On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 1:47 PM, Matthias Petermann (Business) > wrote: >> Hello, >> >> during the last build of my custom package repository I did experience a >> strange issue. I am using Synth, the build host is running FreeBSD >> 10.3/amd64. For the last build run, I receive an error: >> >> In file included from >> /construction/xports/emulators/virtualbox-ose/work/VirtualBox-5.0.26/src/recompiler/cpu-exec.c:30: >> /construction/xports/emulators/virtualbox-ose/work/VirtualBox-5.0.26/src/recompiler/target-i386/exec.h:41:30: >> error: global register variables are not supported >> register struct CPUX86State *env asm(AREG0); >> ^ >> (the full log is available in (1)). The closest I could find is stated >> in a posting from 2012 (2) where a similiar issue from seems to occur >> when Virtualbox is compiled with clang and not gcc. Not sure is this >> still applies today but Makefile seems still to refer --with-gcc. >> >> Some observations: >> * the build issue started when I included multimedia/kdenlive to the >> to-be-built port list >> * both ports (kdenlive and virtualbox-ose) share the Qt4 dependency >> * synth is building each port in a clean chroot, builds dependencies >> first and does a pkg install for them in the clean chroot where >> virtualbox-ose is built >> * kdenlive is built in order before virtualbox-ose, so Qt4 dependency >> build seems to be triggered from kdenlive >> >> Has anyone on this list an idea what is going wrong here? >> >> Thanks in advance & best regards, >> Matthias >> >> >> (1) https://dev.petermann-it.de/nextcloud/index.php/s/RpnDYYiyYSCjenb >> (2) http://osdir.com/ml/freebsd-emulation/2012-04/msg00108.html > The automated FreeBSD package building with poudriere produced the same error > last night for FreeBSD 10.3. > > Since about a year the port uses a mixture of clang and gcc because clang does > not support global register variables. On the other side building all > ports with clang > but only vbox with gcc created issues in KDE. > > The result are a couple of patches from jkim which are not supported > at all but use > both compilers in a mix. Might be they need to be fixed after the > update to vbox 5.0. > Thanks for the clarification. Looks like there is a temporary fix in place now: (from devel/kBuild): 01 Aug 2016 17:25:27 Revision:419443 jkim Re-add USE_GCC=any for now to fix emulators/virtualbox-ose build. Just started my builder again... Best regards, Matthias -- Matthias Petermann | www.petermann-it.de Innovative IT-Lösungen, Systemintegration, FreeBSD/Unix-Suppport Wildparkring 13, 01458 Ottendorf-Okrilla | Mobil: (0178) 523 42 22 GnuPG: 0x5C3E6D75 | 5930 86EF 7965 2BBA 6572 C3D7 7B1D A3C3 5C3E 6D75 From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Aug 2 14:46:48 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55079BACBF9 for ; Tue, 2 Aug 2016 14:46:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: from ms-10.1blu.de (ms-10.1blu.de [178.254.4.101]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 13A8114A8 for ; Tue, 2 Aug 2016 14:46:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: from [88.217.96.216] (helo=localhost.unixarea.de) by ms-10.1blu.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1bUaxm-00089A-HN; Tue, 02 Aug 2016 16:46:34 +0200 Received: from localhost.my.domain (c720-r292778-amd64 [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.unixarea.de (8.15.2/8.14.9) with ESMTPS id u72EkXEE002410 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 2 Aug 2016 16:46:33 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: (from guru@localhost) by localhost.my.domain (8.15.2/8.14.9/Submit) id u72EkUFq002409; Tue, 2 Aug 2016 16:46:30 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) X-Authentication-Warning: localhost.my.domain: guru set sender to guru@unixarea.de using -f Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 16:46:30 +0200 From: Matthias Apitz To: Ian Smith , Warren Block , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: no beep any more (SOLVED) Message-ID: <20160802144630.GA2366@c720-r292778-amd64.oa.oclc.org> Reply-To: Matthias Apitz Mail-Followup-To: Matthias Apitz , Ian Smith , Warren Block , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20160728223053.A29054@sola.nimnet.asn.au> <20160728142521.GA1932@c720-r292778-amd64> <20160802053623.GA2187@c720-r292778-amd64> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20160802053623.GA2187@c720-r292778-amd64> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT r292778 (amd64) User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-Con-Id: 51246 X-Con-U: 0-guru X-Originating-IP: 88.217.96.216 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2016 14:46:48 -0000 El día Tuesday, August 02, 2016 a las 07:36:23AM +0200, Matthias Apitz escribió: > I have had a chat in some forum about Chromebooks. The people there are > not willing to help further because "...we only support plain vanilla > ChromeOS at this forum." Full thread here: > https://productforums.google.com/forum/#!topic/chromebook-central/-MXyMACfcCU;context-place=forum/chromebook-central > > At least someone pointed out that these devices only have stereo audio > speakers (which do fine in my case) and no other "pc speaker" on > motherboard. As the speakers do fine, this must be some problem in our > FreeBSD kernel / audio driver, not sending the printf '\7' to the audio > device. > Now, as it was clear, that it was not a hardware issue, I found after checking the mixer settings, that we have two sound devices: $ cat /dev/sndstat Installed devices: pcm0: (play) pcm1: (play/rec) default $ mixer -f /dev/mixer0 Mixer vol is currently set to 100:100 Mixer pcm is currently set to 100:100 $ mixer Mixer vol is currently set to 91:91 Mixer pcm is currently set to 100:100 Mixer speaker is currently set to 100:100 Mixer mic is currently set to 100:100 Mixer rec is currently set to 100:100 Mixer igain is currently set to 0:0 Mixer ogain is currently set to 100:100 Mixer monitor is currently set to 50:50 Recording source: mic, monitor setting: $ mixer igain 50 Setting the mixer igain from 0:0 to 50:50. $ printf "\7" make it beep $ mixer igain 0 Setting the mixer igain from 50:50 to 0:0. switches off the beeping through the stereo speaker; I have no idea what 'igain' has todo with this... matthias -- Matthias Apitz, ✉ guru@unixarea.de, ⌂ http://www.unixarea.de/ ☎ +49-176-38902045 "Wer übersieht, dass wir uns den anderen weggenommen haben und sie uns wiederhaben wollen, kann von den Kämpfen der letzten Tage keinen verstehen. Und kann natürlich auch keinen dieser Kämpfe bestehen." Hermann Kant in jW 1.10.1989 From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Aug 2 15:17:08 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EFAEBAC558 for ; Tue, 2 Aug 2016 15:17:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rvernica@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qk0-x22e.google.com (mail-qk0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C67817A5 for ; Tue, 2 Aug 2016 15:17:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rvernica@gmail.com) Received: by mail-qk0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id p74so177476484qka.0 for ; Tue, 02 Aug 2016 08:17:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=hJbNGJWf9/vGj5/jTf3VIGSu7Z62921vZ5sksKQx/Qs=; b=fapl2fA1lnW76KS51Fmr6MOzMsYI8j7DCoQX0BKLUh2yDsK0hMm0mW8SkdGhcyErlJ pBwzxv0pHaIpyxf6uoD7PT0EPFrRJ1WXmk+Z0cYn21sCUyUOVSxfXE+d06Wo1FloO8g8 mzUGVHcpxtjEDVbI1NkN1h6iirVm7bvNKTrlJnwiwsZmfADG3s8ka7IUSuD/GF29YY4G Kr9M+9heZo2bWJRfV2ZSvSWMAjMg/yItuMP7J4NUd+HDznAziKV2tNGJfJAJRnpP24Li ATvg1k0dk4jMx9GVLzpjbX6RzxQpdnEcPLI0GNGjOAY+PXoDlwMSDzjx3iJ8lyKj90gV kQiw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=hJbNGJWf9/vGj5/jTf3VIGSu7Z62921vZ5sksKQx/Qs=; b=Wv+WYWhpQh8CyupCCC97efA4dJ0DKJLkGV2aQshjnNJ+//3QBG8Mf8dFHIlMUI769V ZQwENDzWw1rb72a27xTV1XuXxO76282urzWhAgLrIWjoZ9FlwnI9td5uO9JLzHBu8Zvd lAjyN4wLRxHX2sBfuZ1UkuUxGOdeYQZRqLxaNMbvrQuHDKFxxciZ1ePrTntwVljMKnkL K7s6QF/BBScQ6qLSeapAN2CvxgoFRM74ziEgQl04JRlK/lrbfKGRgrK80cN4Ii0XQecv WDXyri8a4h5Uo3NIXdXgBTNBkEMrSp/pKeMoaizdxetBJ3p5b2aVoOz2daa0Ij+BtJT0 SIiw== X-Gm-Message-State: AEkooutAaaQttvi1zqLvusi9GPxuBNAGeR+19avTBvZjXAA3f2fQKUHD7OXQuJgs/PKANxs6MU+MX48J4jvA6Q== X-Received: by 10.55.107.130 with SMTP id g124mr73028440qkc.121.1470151026948; Tue, 02 Aug 2016 08:17:06 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.237.44.68 with HTTP; Tue, 2 Aug 2016 08:17:06 -0700 (PDT) From: Rares Vernica Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 08:17:06 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Root on ZFS, FreeBSD and Linux back and forth To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2016 15:17:08 -0000 Hello, I have two hard drives. One has root-on-ZFS created by FreeBSD (on installation) and one with Linux. I wonder if it is safe and reliable to use the root-on-ZFS disk back and forth between FreeBSD and Linux. On Linux I plan to use ZFS-on-Linux. Both FreeBSD and ZFS-on-Linux seem to use version 5000. To import the zpool in Linux, it seems it needs to be forced. FreeBSD does not export it on shutdown and I am not sure how or if I should do it. How would FreeBSD deal with the zpool if it notices that Linux imported it? Will FreeBSD force the import on boot? Do I have to take special precautions for FreeBSD to import the ZFS disk and boot from it once Linux has touched it? Also, is ZFS-on-Linux trustworthy enough not to mess up the disk? Thanks! Rares From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Aug 2 15:25:22 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41ADABAC8E4 for ; Tue, 2 Aug 2016 15:25:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from michaelsprivate@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yw0-x22d.google.com (mail-yw0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 07FE41FB1 for ; Tue, 2 Aug 2016 15:25:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from michaelsprivate@gmail.com) Received: by mail-yw0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id r9so201204443ywg.0 for ; Tue, 02 Aug 2016 08:25:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Z4aQDbea9zm44he6wKKwvaoOi6r9xu0Fa4YbY0mV4I0=; b=PHsTTXBXFjZOsoinlTWZtRDvqLF/qKSJ1QKCr4wa4PkrNDL0baKcycqYikr+ZcnnYP o4N4zjTQXwYDQfOJIrFmUWab01USmLqhnH3pbUBuxzHW9SRFKkyFh1Y0Nh05CMVLlWmk Z5R7MU74/XGKpYtxDqmYT3gniHXuBmrabA7hV+UNut/EfkAcaAMsPOM0SFj5xjZAs+fB xLgCRA+fZyapoMSOBTNCYreShxk15tDa2m4JpRgGE1Lm/teMsunHJtz+arRchnt7zANX 6vvPpb8d2/9tH+Z2lyIG8ByeVl3JWL3KF10MxK/rNh+Yr9D+sW8ywm/jDNoQczw99BOe G+aA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Z4aQDbea9zm44he6wKKwvaoOi6r9xu0Fa4YbY0mV4I0=; b=cU97yR9B28fOseyt7XbLUtxH8tmwB5BvQStTTVsHrf5vd2XVDdFn1dAoSug2LGFMyO LNpI5dNrA1gZezjy5nc0S2/Y6NKAchn5as89BlG9fESg96YgsMQPZBGRqGqpY6/UAD1X MaNPvLuizraqzpVrkgyvDluvH0ZioO2byjB3I3u9YVZw6StPNB/NVdMVTu3ALbptfitr xE2THFn2kuvFMmib+MyhaLIDk1NiFws0QRTaz/POS4fCYalfMqsnNZ+EAh6bJqfEEQGs lE61scrl78X78ok524vhxauxO5MwTGExMMHVYbaACC0EVd9kphSxwV21fQ/FIS2AZb27 JIrw== X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoouuJDAEePXLGMtBl9p8ea552p6hHkEfyfoJHsEvVxQJd2y6CKIZOFa/H+q/H/XHfQmYnqfD8D9+5LQWgxg== X-Received: by 10.13.212.139 with SMTP id w133mr51268212ywd.49.1470151521344; Tue, 02 Aug 2016 08:25:21 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.37.91.86 with HTTP; Tue, 2 Aug 2016 08:25:00 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Michael Schuster Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 17:25:00 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Root on ZFS, FreeBSD and Linux back and forth To: Rares Vernica Cc: freeBSD Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2016 15:25:22 -0000 I think it'd be interesting to know what you're planning to achieve with this process. regards Michael On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 5:17 PM, Rares Vernica wrote: > Hello, > > I have two hard drives. One has root-on-ZFS created by FreeBSD (on > installation) and one with Linux. I wonder if it is safe and reliable to > use the root-on-ZFS disk back and forth between FreeBSD and Linux. On Linux > I plan to use ZFS-on-Linux. Both FreeBSD and ZFS-on-Linux seem to use > version 5000. > > To import the zpool in Linux, it seems it needs to be forced. FreeBSD does > not export it on shutdown and I am not sure how or if I should do it. > > How would FreeBSD deal with the zpool if it notices that Linux imported it? > Will FreeBSD force the import on boot? Do I have to take special > precautions for FreeBSD to import the ZFS disk and boot from it once Linux > has touched it? > > Also, is ZFS-on-Linux trustworthy enough not to mess up the disk? > > Thanks! > Rares > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- Michael Schuster http://recursiveramblings.wordpress.com/ recursion, n: see 'recursion' From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Aug 2 15:47:23 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F24CBAD067 for ; Tue, 2 Aug 2016 15:47:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from trond@fagskolen.gjovik.no) Received: from smtp.fagskolen.gjovik.no (smtp.fagskolen.gjovik.no [IPv6:2001:700:1100:1:200:ff:fe00:b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.fagskolen.gjovik.no", Issuer "Fagskolen i Gj??vik" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 13B0615BE for ; Tue, 2 Aug 2016 15:47:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from trond@fagskolen.gjovik.no) Received: from mail.fig.ol.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.fig.ol.no (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id u72FlBWs099950 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 2 Aug 2016 17:47:11 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from trond@fagskolen.gjovik.no) Received: from localhost (trond@localhost) by mail.fig.ol.no (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) with ESMTP id u72FlBfl099947; Tue, 2 Aug 2016 17:47:11 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from trond@fagskolen.gjovik.no) X-Authentication-Warning: mail.fig.ol.no: trond owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 17:47:11 +0200 (CEST) From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Trond_Endrest=F8l?= Sender: Trond.Endrestol@fagskolen.gjovik.no To: Rares Vernica cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Root on ZFS, FreeBSD and Linux back and forth In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (BSF 67 2015-01-07) Organization: Fagskolen Innlandet OpenPGP: url=http://fig.ol.no/~trond/trond.key MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on mail.fig.ol.no Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2016 15:47:23 -0000 On Tue, 2 Aug 2016 08:17-0700, Rares Vernica wrote: > Hello, > > I have two hard drives. One has root-on-ZFS created by FreeBSD (on > installation) and one with Linux. I wonder if it is safe and reliable to > use the root-on-ZFS disk back and forth between FreeBSD and Linux. On Linux > I plan to use ZFS-on-Linux. Both FreeBSD and ZFS-on-Linux seem to use > version 5000. > > To import the zpool in Linux, it seems it needs to be forced. FreeBSD does > not export it on shutdown and I am not sure how or if I should do it. > > How would FreeBSD deal with the zpool if it notices that Linux imported it? > Will FreeBSD force the import on boot? Do I have to take special > precautions for FreeBSD to import the ZFS disk and boot from it once Linux > has touched it? I guess the FreeBSD kernel would refuse to access an exported root pool, leading to a panic à la "mountroot: unable to (re-)mount root.". If you want to share a zpool between FreeBSD and Linux, you should create a dedicated pool. Use custom startup and shutdown scripts for importing and exporting the shared pool on both systems. Be prepared for manual intervention in case of a crash on either system, or craft your scripts to forcefully import the pool if it fails to import on the first attempt. Also, try to keep the enabled features to a minimum. Create the shared pool like this: zpool create -d sharedpool ... Enable only the features you need and supported on both systems. > Also, is ZFS-on-Linux trustworthy enough not to mess up the disk? Don't know. Maybe someone does. -- +-------------------------------+------------------------------------+ | Vennlig hilsen, | Best regards, | | Trond Endrestøl, | Trond Endrestøl, | | IT-ansvarlig, | System administrator, | | Fagskolen Innlandet, | Gjøvik Technical College, Norway, | | tlf. mob. 952 62 567, | Cellular...: +47 952 62 567, | | sentralbord 61 14 54 00. | Switchboard: +47 61 14 54 00. | +-------------------------------+------------------------------------+ From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Aug 2 15:57:43 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F27ABAD3AB for ; Tue, 2 Aug 2016 15:57:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jim@ohlste.in) Received: from mail-qk0-x234.google.com (mail-qk0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CD85F1DCB for ; Tue, 2 Aug 2016 15:57:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jim@ohlste.in) Received: by mail-qk0-x234.google.com with SMTP id s63so178960067qkb.2 for ; Tue, 02 Aug 2016 08:57:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ohlste-in.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=BG3urTyyCR9MnD+9lFdL1V8Vh3FsoiBkcxXZQv4NIQk=; b=o3fw3GbN9rJwekXzchMAGzxpKnI/yO67QSTJH+484RdvRf9SVKhEuYbCWadG6F5dZ3 JvwLxLPNxHQd8BkD0Kyf05F1MrNLqwl61/qCC569DIPZ7aRcdASyQCOJ3nFUhOK4dQHX FcXgOFQ1lt3KaphvY3NhgnGBUkmS6FGbrupcQY3J/B/Fjhc6qghvDybepITAjcupVt9u fcM//bhVG7HxWwEZ+YNC0ji47jx6uf+bqC7/QJztD1zb5vz+r5X8kJ5A4+j4RyjaAKam H2wAA/izwjqp7Vcj44YYbWdrX8AjdSpO/edqZc3QwKPOoimsMQJTmi0KJFLhCeRdGwzT 1YCQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=BG3urTyyCR9MnD+9lFdL1V8Vh3FsoiBkcxXZQv4NIQk=; b=k1bykDJ42vEwuYF0M6GxkFUF/Yf6Pwisuj4EFI/cNp9SeIiV/nDto1GPKs6m38S8aU YzelvcfmJIRoDIu4h4/5Caa+IulHuVcGxurG0fKenh0AcawZ4tNFkE4n+O7tNNvLnTXA Bx/Q2K1AvkS/FoDgMrikIWyuNhmnA/9FBO3o5GrBhvuzmu41XjnRZicxtBnwgVdSGikN /Lw4BBxghdmfTtnSoWXDS8LLiSTJz1ydelxdVwOOCgiWuUHrJ/iyilZUjME7y+HyGp9V Otbu9BcnqMz2s8uV6hUtXZ4ZF6BHKyNrvQ7cdfFolwgDmjJkNjrS7n26BGnDvgcX0J1A BK8Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoouuwNx11ZL5jO3xvvlybRoBEKurKqNemNH7+MSTNX5j9UFTQALcce1NUVRcUgDEG1g== X-Received: by 10.55.221.18 with SMTP id n18mr32821170qki.142.1470153461585; Tue, 02 Aug 2016 08:57:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.4] (pool-108-39-110-225.nrflva.fios.verizon.net. [108.39.110.225]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 127sm1671521qkk.19.2016.08.02.08.57.40 (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 02 Aug 2016 08:57:40 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Subject: Re: Root on ZFS, FreeBSD and Linux back and forth From: Jim Ohlstein X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (13G34) In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 11:57:39 -0400 Cc: Rares Vernica , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: To: =?utf-8?Q?Trond_Endrest=C3=B8l?= X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2016 15:57:43 -0000 Hello, > On Aug 2, 2016, at 11:47 AM, Trond Endrest=C3=B8l wrote: >=20 >> On Tue, 2 Aug 2016 08:17-0700, Rares Vernica wrote: >>=20 >> Hello, >>=20 >> I have two hard drives. One has root-on-ZFS created by FreeBSD (on >> installation) and one with Linux. I wonder if it is safe and reliable to >> use the root-on-ZFS disk back and forth between FreeBSD and Linux. On Lin= ux >> I plan to use ZFS-on-Linux. Both FreeBSD and ZFS-on-Linux seem to use >> version 5000. >>=20 >> To import the zpool in Linux, it seems it needs to be forced. FreeBSD doe= s >> not export it on shutdown and I am not sure how or if I should do it. >>=20 >> How would FreeBSD deal with the zpool if it notices that Linux imported i= t? >> Will FreeBSD force the import on boot? Do I have to take special >> precautions for FreeBSD to import the ZFS disk and boot from it once Linu= x >> has touched it? >=20 > I guess the FreeBSD kernel would refuse to access an exported root=20 > pool, leading to a panic =C3=A0 la "mountroot: unable to (re-)mount root."= . >=20 > If you want to share a zpool between FreeBSD and Linux, you should=20 > create a dedicated pool. >=20 > Use custom startup and shutdown scripts for importing and exporting=20 > the shared pool on both systems. Be prepared for manual intervention=20 > in case of a crash on either system, or craft your scripts to=20 > forcefully import the pool if it fails to import on the first attempt. >=20 > Also, try to keep the enabled features to a minimum. > Create the shared pool like this: >=20 > zpool create -d sharedpool ... >=20 > Enable only the features you need and supported on both systems. >=20 >> Also, is ZFS-on-Linux trustworthy enough not to mess up the disk? >=20 > Don't know. Maybe someone does. I've used it on a Debian box for a year or so. Just a simple mirrored pool. N= o problems. Have never tried sharing the pool.=20 -- Jim= From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Aug 2 15:59:53 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BC96BAD440 for ; Tue, 2 Aug 2016 15:59:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from sola.nimnet.asn.au (paqi.nimnet.asn.au [115.70.110.159]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AEC631ED5 for ; Tue, 2 Aug 2016 15:59:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sola.nimnet.asn.au (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id u72FxfA9003591; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 01:59:41 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2016 01:59:41 +1000 (EST) From: Ian Smith To: Matthias Apitz cc: Warren Block , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: no beep any more (SOLVED) In-Reply-To: <20160802144630.GA2366@c720-r292778-amd64.oa.oclc.org> Message-ID: <20160803013156.V56585@sola.nimnet.asn.au> References: <20160728223053.A29054@sola.nimnet.asn.au> <20160728142521.GA1932@c720-r292778-amd64> <20160802053623.GA2187@c720-r292778-amd64> <20160802144630.GA2366@c720-r292778-amd64.oa.oclc.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2016 15:59:53 -0000 On Tue, 2 Aug 2016 16:46:30 +0200, Matthias Apitz wrote: > El día Tuesday, August 02, 2016 a las 07:36:23AM +0200, Matthias Apitz escribió: > > > I have had a chat in some forum about Chromebooks. The people there are > > not willing to help further because "...we only support plain vanilla > > ChromeOS at this forum." Full thread here: > > https://productforums.google.com/forum/#!topic/chromebook-central/-MXyMACfcCU;context-place=forum/chromebook-central > > > > At least someone pointed out that these devices only have stereo audio > > speakers (which do fine in my case) and no other "pc speaker" on > > motherboard. As the speakers do fine, this must be some problem in our > > FreeBSD kernel / audio driver, not sending the printf '\7' to the audio > > device. > > > > Now, as it was clear, that it was not a hardware issue, I found after > checking the mixer settings, that we have two sound devices: > > $ cat /dev/sndstat > Installed devices: > pcm0: (play) > pcm1: (play/rec) default > > $ mixer -f /dev/mixer0 > Mixer vol is currently set to 100:100 > Mixer pcm is currently set to 100:100 > > $ mixer > Mixer vol is currently set to 91:91 > Mixer pcm is currently set to 100:100 > Mixer speaker is currently set to 100:100 > Mixer mic is currently set to 100:100 > Mixer rec is currently set to 100:100 > Mixer igain is currently set to 0:0 > Mixer ogain is currently set to 100:100 > Mixer monitor is currently set to 50:50 > Recording source: mic, monitor > > setting: > > $ mixer igain 50 > Setting the mixer igain from 0:0 to 50:50. > $ printf "\7" > > make it beep > > $ mixer igain 0 > Setting the mixer igain from 50:50 to 0:0. > > switches off the beeping through the stereo speaker; I have no idea what > 'igain' has todo with this... Wow, 10/10 for persistence, Matthias .. and this is something I doubt anyone would have noticed, even had you shown mixer settings earlier. I guess they must have just used the mixer igain 'slot' for the speaker. I'm sure we're all glad you managed to solve it, despite our 'help' :) Two questions: Do values apart than 50 provide different beep volumes, or is it off/on? And does 'kldload speaker ; spkrtest' work with it? cheers, Ian From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Aug 2 17:02:58 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A59C3BAA119 for ; Tue, 2 Aug 2016 17:02:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sairamartin92@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ua0-x247.google.com (mail-ua0-x247.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c08::247]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6172E1167 for ; Tue, 2 Aug 2016 17:02:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sairamartin92@gmail.com) Received: by mail-ua0-x247.google.com with SMTP id m60so232771444uam.3 for ; Tue, 02 Aug 2016 10:02:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:message-id:date:subject:from:to; bh=+mOAPoHtctd7HtngR+5IJeW10tgMgNZ6ZnA6RlUqmog=; b=TBsFwyqS2OiKAdevHySOck5Sz0NEJi4mec2tcwOoWZshO0blE2Hg9u+6HuHsuUdwLi qhqYlbMScYjGS/oUAXh9lF+s2O2MSmEEHvG2gtHuoNgOafXoXjSEW210UbAAxmfrmseC udWnccYg9VKBQ7nBR5ZwAfRbmcy80r8ffwD5VeHalHBcp2P8oq5UOEa93dtlfujy35jZ oUqDmAL3tgv+p1asFDdIGb3CoteBxUpcDpNnjbGt+gddOYCyN7bWMo7R0YsPfJk3wu2J wq6iR+4aWcg70bZbqwAAeqEU0h9YAfC6rWI7iYqraau4cuqsuX/AouKNjauQiKoKKvPF Bomg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:message-id:date:subject:from:to; bh=+mOAPoHtctd7HtngR+5IJeW10tgMgNZ6ZnA6RlUqmog=; b=gxVgfO5gJ8fELIADV2yoz8ApbHwBRF7LviegXAKbFPsH8HiFrhgNIKPd6Yz6IsMVLn 73MTcjrTJgyFxsOjX6CSZUSnPQHzFNPRLs5+1fTCPNIolmdVYdljKEtZ+zYfWisgZARN N+ZtkA24zkR5dsT25DeiLnwfp+pwyMzbdE9CinWZBXZQa2VDF0dbnMOkXplEM/Wc8FF9 UT5scnJvy38m6D8QZ2MbRtYScpg21jeEcJut+SHDMriZ7B49WRG+ajSEP/oWSKcPiRBk 05fS8wFi3ZeTNoFRYWKFkX1LBWWdlhZ8zP0nfHbZRF3eqHYg5BmaXxsTP42WuxIC+lqm pa4Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoousaGDj3yT3k3xSoT6aIwWleRUhjZ59nPtM6HY1t7gRo19Q8AQbU+7XgSCVRzzLttuqB8Jx2GiavxO7F/Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.237.49.36 with SMTP id 33mr42927782qtg.15.1470157377159; Tue, 02 Aug 2016 10:02:57 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <94eb2c0c7a103ad1ed053919b0f8@google.com> Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2016 17:02:57 +0000 Subject: Promotion Strategy for your website Freebsddiary.org online sale. From: Smart Rank To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2016 17:02:58 -0000 DQoNCkRlYXIgKkZyZWVic2RkaWFyeS5vcmcgKk93bmVyLA0KDQoNCg0KSG9wZSB5b3UgYXJlIGRv aW5nIHdlbGwuDQoNCg0KDQpXZSB3b3VsZCBsaWtlIHRvIGhhdmUgYSBkaXNjdXNzaW9uIHdpdGgg eW91IHJlZ2FyZGluZyB0aGUgd2ViIHByb21vdGlvbg0Kc3RyYXRlZ3kgZm9yIHlvdXIgd2Vic2l0 ZSAqRnJlZWJzZGRpYXJ5Lm9yZyAqLiBXZSB3aXNoIHRvIHdvcmsgb3V0IGEgIA0KcHJvcG9zYWwN CnRvIHN0cmVuZ3RoZW4gdGhlIG9ubGluZS4NCg0KDQoNCldlIG9mZmVyIHlvdSBtb3JlIGVmZmVj dGl2ZSBhbmQgbW9yZSBhZmZvcmRhYmxlIHNvbHV0aW9uISBXZSB0YWtlIHlvdXINCndlYnNpdGUg dG8gTm8xIFBvc2l0aW9uIG9mIHRoZSBHb29nbGUuY29tIG9yIG9yZ2FuaWMgbGlzdGluZyBvZiBH b29nbGUgdGhhdA0KdG9vIG9uIHRoZSBmaXJzdCBwYWdlIG9mIHNlYXJjaCByZXN1bHRzIGZvciB5 b3VyIGFueSBudW1iZXIgb2Yga2V5d29yZHMuIEl0DQptYWtlcyBzZW5zZSB0byBvcHQgZm9yIHRv cCBmcmVlIGxpc3Rpbmcgd2hlbiBtb3JlIHRoYW4gODAgcGVyY2VudCBvZiB3ZWINCnVzZXJzIHJl bHkgdG8gZmluZCB0aGVpciBkZXNpcmVkIHByb2R1Y3Qgb3Igc2VydmljZSBpbiBnb29nbGUsIHlh aG9vICYgYmluZy4NCg0KDQpwcmVzZW5jZSBvZiB5b3VyIHdlYnNpdGUsIHZpYS4gQSBzdHJhdGVn aWNhbGx5IHBsYW5uZWQgd2ViIHByb21vdGlvbg0KY2FtcGFpZ24uIEluIHRvZGF5J3Mgb25saW5l IGVyYSwgeW91IHNob3VsZCBiZSBmb2N1c2luZyBvbiB0aGUgbmV3DQpyZXZvbHV0aW9uYXJ5IHdh eXMgb2YgZ2VuZXJhdGluZyB0cmFmZmljLg0KDQoNCg0KV2Ugd2VyZSBjdXJpb3VzIHRvIGtub3cg aWYgeW91IHdlcmUgYXdhcmUgdGhhdCBhcmUgYSBmZXcgaXNzdWVzIGJ1Z2dpbmcNCnlvdXIgd2Vi c2l0ZS4gU29ydGluZyBvdXQgdGhlc2Ugd2lsbCBoZWxwIHlvdSBnZXQgdGhlIGJlc3QgcmV0dXJu cyBvdXQgb2YNCnlvdXIgd2Vic2l0ZS4NCg0KDQoNCuKAollvdXIgd2Vic2l0ZSogRnJlZWJzZGRp YXJ5Lm9yZyogc2VlbXMgdG8gYmUgYXR0cmFjdGluZyB0cmFmZmljLCBidXQgdGhpcw0KdHJhZmZp YyBpcyBhbG1vc3Qgc3RhZ25hbnQgYW5kIGxpbWl0ZWQsIHdoaWNoIGFmZmVjdHMgcG90ZW50aWFs IHNhbGVzIGFzDQp5b3UgbW92ZSBmb3J3YXJkLg0KDQrigKJZb3VyIHdlYnNpdGUqIEZyZWVic2Rk aWFyeS5vcmcqIGRvZXNuJ3QgZmVhdHVyZSBpbiBHb29nbGUncyBmaXJzdCBzZWFyY2gNCnBhZ2Ug Zm9yIHNvbWUgb2YgdGhlIG1ham9yIGtleXdvcmRzIGluIHlvdXIgbmljaGUsIHdoaWNoIGFmZmVj dHMgdmlzaWJpbGl0eS4NCg0K4oCiWW91ciB3ZWJzaXRlICpGcmVlYnNkZGlhcnkub3JnKiBoYXMg YmVlbiBkaWFnbm9zZWQgd2l0aCBjb2RpbmcgaXNzdWVzLCAgDQp3aGljaA0KYWZmZWN0cyB0aGUg cmFua2luZy4NCg0K4oCiWW91ciBiYWNrIGxpbmsgcHJvZmlsZSBpcyBub3QgZWZmaWNpZW50IGVu b3VnaCB0byBoZWxwIHlvdXIgc2VhcmNoIGVuZ2luZQ0KdmlzaWJpbGl0eS4NCg0K4oCiWW91ciB3 ZWJzaXRlIEZyZWVic2RkaWFyeS5vcmcgaXMgY3VycmVudGx5IG5vdCBiZWluZyBwcm9wZXJseSBw cm9tb3RlZA0Kb25saW5lLCB3aGljaCBpcyBhZmZlY3RpbmcgeW91ciBtYXJrZXRpbmcgc3RyYXRl Z3kgYW5kIGdvYWxzDQoNCuKAollvdXIgcHJlc2VuY2UgaW4gc29jaWFsIG1lZGlhIHBsYXRmb3Jt IChGYWNlYm9vaywgVHdpdHRlciwgZXRjLikgaXMNCm1pbmltYWwuIFRoaXMgaXMgZGVwcml2aW5n IHlvdSBvZiBhIGh1Z2UgbWFya2V0IG9mIHByb3NwZWN0aXZlIHJlZmVycmFsDQpjbGllbnRzLg0K DQoNCg0KV2UgZXhjZWwgaW4gcnVubmluZyBwcm9tb3Rpb25hbCBvbmxpbmUgbWFya2V0aW5nIGNh bXBhaWduIGZvciB3ZWJzaXRlcy4gV2UNCmhhdmUgYSBob3N0IG9mIGV0aGljYWwgc2VydmljZXMg YW5kIHRlY2huaXF1ZXMsIHdoaWNoIHlvdSBjYW4gdXRpbGl6ZSB0bw0KaW1wcm92ZSB5b3VyIHdl YnNpdGUncyBwZXJmb3JtYW5jZS4gV2Ugd2lsbCBvcHRpbWl6ZSB5b3VyIHdlYnNpdGUgYWNjb3Jk aW5nDQp0byBHb29nbGUncyByZWNlbnQgdXBkYXRlcyBsaWtlIFBhbmRhIGFuZCBQZW5ndWluOyBz byB0aGF0IHlvdSBjYW4gZWFzaWx5DQpiZWF0IHlvdXIgY29tcGV0aXRvcnMgYW5kIHlvdXIgd2Vi c2l0ZSB3aWxsIGdldCBhIGh1Z2UgYW1vdW50IG9mIHRyYWZmaWMuDQoNCg0KDQpXZSB3b3VsZCBs b3ZlIHRvIGhlYXIgZnJvbSB5b3UgcmVnYXJkaW5nIGFueSBxdWVzdGlvbnMgeW91IG1pZ2h0IGhh dmUuDQpQbGVhc2UgbGV0IHVzIGtub3cgaWYgeW91IHdpc2ggdG8gbW92ZSBmdXJ0aGVyLCBzbyB0 aGF0IHdlIGNhbiBzY2hlZHVsZSBhDQptZWV0aW5nIHdpdGhvdXQgZGlzdHVyYmluZyB5b3VyIGJ1 c3kgc2NoZWR1bGUuDQoNCg0KDQpXYWl0aW5nIGZvciB5b3VyIHJlc3BvbnNlIQ0KDQoNCg0KUmVn YXJkcywNCg0KU2FpcmEgTWFydGluDQoNCkRJU0NMQUlNRVI6IFdlIHVuZGVyc3RhbmQgdGhhdCB5 b3UgYWxtb3N0IGNlcnRhaW5seSBnZXQgYSBsb3Qgb2Ygc3BhbQ0KZW1haWxzIGV2ZXJ5IGRheSwg YnV0IEkgYW0gYSByZWFsIHBlcnNvbiBhbmQgbm90IGEgc3BhbSBib3QuIFRoaXMgZS1tYWlsDQpt ZXNzYWdlIG1heSBjb250YWluIHByb3ByaWV0YXJ5IG9yIGxlZ2FsbHkgaG9ub3JlZCBpbmZvcm1h dGlvbi4gV2UgYXJlIHJlYWwNClNFTyBDb21wYW55IG5vdCBhIHNwYW1tZXIuDQo= From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Aug 2 17:57:42 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3A67BAACDD for ; Tue, 2 Aug 2016 17:57:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bourne.identity@hotmail.com) Received: from SNT004-OMC2S20.hotmail.com (snt004-omc2s20.hotmail.com [65.55.90.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.outlook.com", Issuer "Microsoft IT SSL SHA2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 75C9B125C for ; Tue, 2 Aug 2016 17:57:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bourne.identity@hotmail.com) Received: from EUR01-HE1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([65.55.90.72]) by SNT004-OMC2S20.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.23008); Tue, 2 Aug 2016 10:56:35 -0700 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hotmail.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=eYs8UUPuVYGfiBGoNGQEGbqGMFXLG9bWtm/PUFcLKso=; b=vAYfvD/XcHZrCetkOnJOcah14Q0guphlUXTrNsfNml97jZ33Zq4PMjwe7iPj6bhuABBPSIYGv6pKHPPHYvssISPKtPDzPR9YcTQ3W14+PdV6Bg7RBRLQJFrtzj6tkYaHpG7ua20ZOm7C0GJ/KVL8kJYn0IdjQ14IkHg2uDNuu/IdwBS5rtFMc9o1m0Re9jpVAwoxPClMFED0XgV8d4QxNDGWzab/zz5NIcjY7IRA1Pr/CwURxYhsdlE0xwyvNL4k90L8/GHD+TZhyGajabeS6RuGgJIeJicYWOehzUABE6bwceOFm1UBfPsF5whGjExC+fZKlJwfhvUWrINsJcR4+w== Received: from HE1EUR01FT059.eop-EUR01.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.0.53) by HE1EUR01HT144.eop-EUR01.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.1.194) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_0, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA_P384) id 15.1.557.8; Tue, 2 Aug 2016 17:56:33 +0000 Received: from VI1PR02MB0974.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com (10.152.0.56) by HE1EUR01FT059.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.0.241) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.1.557.8 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 2 Aug 2016 17:56:33 +0000 Received: from VI1PR02MB0974.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com ([10.163.162.28]) by VI1PR02MB0974.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com ([10.163.162.28]) with mapi id 15.01.0549.022; Tue, 2 Aug 2016 17:56:31 +0000 From: Manish Jain To: FreeBSD Questions CC: Polytropon Subject: Looking for motherboard advice Thread-Topic: Looking for motherboard advice Thread-Index: AQHR7OczIiaJaEiG/UWM2VNvr2K87w== Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 17:56:31 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: authentication-results: spf=softfail (sender IP is 10.152.0.56) smtp.mailfrom=hotmail.com; freebsd.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;freebsd.org; dmarc=fail action=none header.from=hotmail.com; received-spf: SoftFail (protection.outlook.com: domain of transitioning hotmail.com discourages use of 10.152.0.56 as permitted sender) x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1 x-eopattributedmessage: 0 x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:10.152.0.56; IPV:NLI; CTRY:; EFV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(98900003); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:HE1EUR01HT144; H:VI1PR02MB0974.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; HE1EUR01HT144; 6:0aF66/r1R5ISI1+TEM9B5e52GiYFGuxKUgXbvJylJ3DLXFWzFqP3YFoagE5OViNET2fmrLw6+SuIL3F1McJyJy1fvtm+eZg4XPWesYH4L1pan7B9QvylUY2LWB8aaYHf6ZEtDdy2c7mw7hhNLIy8Let8xarpor0hGYu8gVTYFXtsKm8/mgCh2R07rdToNqJ2lpT9Nw6PdeXqYXx+jve6itCxKlOnrviy5Mw9bj46aSAYZtvfD5grtQSsvDHY0a6tKjx1rRPIQylS4Fsmmi399+PKNXnhxEGv/ReYIOpsWUpK7UuQpiVjP9z4sFeKNV7j; 5:J39w9GB05+dU+/MBHAKCeI5QpeQhR9m0CJ8we3MZLzByeDK40YdD7KJRsOXJbWxMjwN8PV0febddHlWwJvLNH6oucdPxRVh6mV1fzmTas2iPcz8sgX75E7x/URutmzmrnySoaWCAJooOnLHHEjpP4Q==; 24:tv8l7P6wFLvXR0mQyq+1xK1ugMOe8GSr9HY4J2E3nzV0tiMH2bbqgde0GcREe5GYD3JUc1bVb0aJikaxI/az04lXt3L1eLAfhxrCqQwulmQ=; 7:ced+NFfeRAyZRcfms5RFhMsdoRARdjv9lPMr88tirCdYAdfr1gY5/1vzNr+0UBNdZboQFd4/ueVV/vMpq2UwG/+o9OBrdTW52OIYn00wlg0b4QdG8Ut5J8blPh37G1tQtDRr7bGHTV5mTxm6ekYoR8ml8T3QUBEk13h93vApqO+FbrWvRCYUoYtAjxsQTrwQtKuckTnDtp3a7wem2geGReXh5mEEZLMpBpZECaRULhM6JHbez4UkMgf5B8o3Oe6A x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: a31d36de-9c20-42a1-fe2d-08d3bafe553c x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(1601124038)(1601125047); SRVR:HE1EUR01HT144; x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(432015012)(82015046); SRVR:HE1EUR01HT144; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:HE1EUR01HT144; x-forefront-prvs: 0022134A87 spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99 spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: hotmail.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 02 Aug 2016 17:56:31.7783 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Internet X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: HE1EUR01HT144 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Aug 2016 17:56:35.0937 (UTC) FILETIME=[36148510:01D1ECE7] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2016 17:57:42 -0000 Hi, I am looking to replace my ASUS (chipset AMD 760G) motherboard -=20 the motherboard is making so much noise that it is becoming problematic sitting next to the PC. My current motherboard model is ASUS M5A78L-M V2, which seems to support=20 SATA 6 Gb/s. I have a SSD which needs SATA 6 Gb/s, so I am looking for a=20 new motherboard which has that too. My only other requirement is it should= =20 have onboard graphics - I don't want to spend extra on a separate VGA card= =20 and have to bother whether the card works on FreeBSD. Can anybody please advise whether there is any AMD-based motherboard which= =20 meets both the above criteria ? One obvious candidate for my 'upgrade'=20 would have been ASUS M5A78L V3, but that seems to have only SATA 3 Gb/s. My current processor is Athlon II X2-270, although I can replace the=20 processor too if needed. Since I am writing from India, my primary shopping avenues are amazon.in and flipkart. Thanks for any help Manish Jain From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Aug 2 18:25:56 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F311DBAC4D7 for ; Tue, 2 Aug 2016 18:25:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: from ms-10.1blu.de (ms-10.1blu.de [178.254.4.101]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A969614E3 for ; Tue, 2 Aug 2016 18:25:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: from [89.204.135.209] (helo=localhost.unixarea.de) by ms-10.1blu.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1bUeNz-0000oE-3d; Tue, 02 Aug 2016 20:25:51 +0200 Received: from localhost.my.domain (c720-r292778-amd64 [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.unixarea.de (8.15.2/8.14.9) with ESMTPS id u72IPlpo002366 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 2 Aug 2016 20:25:47 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: (from guru@localhost) by localhost.my.domain (8.15.2/8.14.9/Submit) id u72IPiOX002365; Tue, 2 Aug 2016 20:25:44 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) X-Authentication-Warning: localhost.my.domain: guru set sender to guru@unixarea.de using -f Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 20:25:44 +0200 From: Matthias Apitz To: Ian Smith Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: no beep any more (SOLVED) Message-ID: <20160802182544.GA2254@c720-r292778-amd64> Reply-To: Matthias Apitz Mail-Followup-To: Matthias Apitz , Ian Smith , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20160728223053.A29054@sola.nimnet.asn.au> <20160728142521.GA1932@c720-r292778-amd64> <20160802053623.GA2187@c720-r292778-amd64> <20160802144630.GA2366@c720-r292778-amd64.oa.oclc.org> <20160803013156.V56585@sola.nimnet.asn.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20160803013156.V56585@sola.nimnet.asn.au> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT r292778 (amd64) User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-Con-Id: 51246 X-Con-U: 0-guru X-Originating-IP: 89.204.135.209 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2016 18:25:56 -0000 El día Wednesday, August 03, 2016 a las 01:59:41AM +1000, Ian Smith escribió: > Two questions: Do values apart than 50 provide different beep volumes, > or is it off/on? You can use any value between 0...100; 50 is to awake all your colleagues in the office from their dreams, 10 is fine for just noting that you did something wrong in vim or shell; > And does 'kldload speaker ; spkrtest' work with it? with 'kldload speaker' (I compiled even a debug version to understand it) you get a device /dev/speaker, controlled as well with 'igain' and one can play tones with something like # echo CDEFGAB > /dev/speaker Thanks for supporting me in my persistence matthias -- Matthias Apitz, ✉ guru@unixarea.de, ⌂ http://www.unixarea.de/ ☎ +49-176-38902045 "Wer übersieht, dass wir uns den anderen weggenommen haben und sie uns wiederhaben wollen, kann von den Kämpfen der letzten Tage keinen verstehen. Und kann natürlich auch keinen dieser Kämpfe bestehen." Hermann Kant in jW 1.10.1989 From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Aug 2 18:41:49 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 974C7BAC7F9 for ; Tue, 2 Aug 2016 18:41:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from merlyn@geeks.org) Received: from mail.geeks.org (mail.geeks.org [IPv6:2001:470:c2ca:1::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7BE791C8B for ; Tue, 2 Aug 2016 18:41:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from merlyn@geeks.org) Received: from mail.geeks.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by after-clamsmtpd.geeks.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45A2F110235 for ; Tue, 2 Aug 2016 13:41:42 -0500 (CDT) Received: by mail.geeks.org (Postfix, from userid 1003) id 250BF110233; Tue, 2 Aug 2016 13:41:42 -0500 (CDT) Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 13:41:42 -0500 From: Doug McIntyre To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD-10.3-RELEASE-amd64-memstick.img broken? Message-ID: <20160802184142.GA45983@geeks.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2016 18:41:49 -0000 I've tried several times to have systems boot off of FreeBSD-10.3-RELEASE-amd64-memstick.img I've been quite successful with 10.0 through 10.2 boot sticks. I just downloaded FreeBSD-10.2-RELEASE-amd64-memstick.img and did the same stick, same actions to burn it and boot it, and it worked fine. I think the official RELEASE of 10.3 amd64 memstick image is broken? What I get is Error 1 LBA 1339168 Invalid Format and then a boot prompt, that fails to boot further. I seem to have good copies. tritium:~> shasum -a 512 FreeBSD-10.3-RELEASE-amd64-memstick.img 94f7708ac5b0e744c9dc40f19b45a2f6d0ac87f0ce0e3cd5c084a5d860ac16c3a3e167b04d4354faf9a70ef2836925518f072bc6b03147a1672ffb7790644b5f FreeBSD-10.3-RELEASE-amd64-memstick.img which matches the SHA512 of the announcement https://www.freebsd.org/releases/10.3R/announce.html even so, I've tried downloading it from 3 mirrors and got all the same copy. I've tried multiple systems, multiple sticks and multiple machines to burn it. For the life of me, I can not make 10.3 RELEASE amd64 memstick boot, but I can for 10.2, 10.1 & 10.0 with no problems on any of the cobinations of any of the hardware I have. Does anybody else have problems booting off this memory stick image? From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Aug 2 18:45:27 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C79E1BACA90 for ; Tue, 2 Aug 2016 18:45:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from trond@fagskolen.gjovik.no) Received: from smtp.fagskolen.gjovik.no (smtp.fagskolen.gjovik.no [IPv6:2001:700:1100:1:200:ff:fe00:b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.fagskolen.gjovik.no", Issuer "Fagskolen i Gj??vik" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 56C6F1278 for ; Tue, 2 Aug 2016 18:45:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from trond@fagskolen.gjovik.no) Received: from mail.fig.ol.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.fig.ol.no (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id u72IjI6t003903 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 2 Aug 2016 20:45:18 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from trond@fagskolen.gjovik.no) Received: from localhost (trond@localhost) by mail.fig.ol.no (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) with ESMTP id u72IjIqr003900; Tue, 2 Aug 2016 20:45:18 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from trond@fagskolen.gjovik.no) X-Authentication-Warning: mail.fig.ol.no: trond owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 20:45:18 +0200 (CEST) From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Trond_Endrest=F8l?= Sender: Trond.Endrestol@fagskolen.gjovik.no To: Doug McIntyre cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD-10.3-RELEASE-amd64-memstick.img broken? In-Reply-To: <20160802184142.GA45983@geeks.org> Message-ID: References: <20160802184142.GA45983@geeks.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (BSF 67 2015-01-07) Organization: Fagskolen Innlandet OpenPGP: url=http://fig.ol.no/~trond/trond.key MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on mail.fig.ol.no Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2016 18:45:27 -0000 On Tue, 2 Aug 2016 13:41-0500, Doug McIntyre wrote: > I've tried several times to have systems boot off of > FreeBSD-10.3-RELEASE-amd64-memstick.img > > I've been quite successful with 10.0 through 10.2 boot sticks. > I just downloaded FreeBSD-10.2-RELEASE-amd64-memstick.img and did > the same stick, same actions to burn it and boot it, and it worked fine. > > I think the official RELEASE of 10.3 amd64 memstick image is broken? > > What I get is > > Error 1 > LBA 1339168 Invalid Format > > and then a boot prompt, that fails to boot further. > > I seem to have good copies. > > tritium:~> shasum -a 512 FreeBSD-10.3-RELEASE-amd64-memstick.img > 94f7708ac5b0e744c9dc40f19b45a2f6d0ac87f0ce0e3cd5c084a5d860ac16c3a3e167b04d4354faf9a70ef2836925518f072bc6b03147a1672ffb7790644b5f FreeBSD-10.3-RELEASE-amd64-memstick.img > > which matches the SHA512 of the announcement > https://www.freebsd.org/releases/10.3R/announce.html > > even so, I've tried downloading it from 3 mirrors and got all the same copy. > > I've tried multiple systems, multiple sticks and multiple machines to > burn it. For the life of me, I can not make 10.3 RELEASE amd64 > memstick boot, but I can for 10.2, 10.1 & 10.0 with no problems on any of > the cobinations of any of the hardware I have. > > Does anybody else have problems booting off this memory stick image? You might need correct the primary and secondary GPT's on the memstick by running: gpart recover da0 # or da1, etc It's due to your memstick being larger than the image. -- +-------------------------------+------------------------------------+ | Vennlig hilsen, | Best regards, | | Trond Endrestøl, | Trond Endrestøl, | | IT-ansvarlig, | System administrator, | | Fagskolen Innlandet, | Gjøvik Technical College, Norway, | | tlf. mob. 952 62 567, | Cellular...: +47 952 62 567, | | sentralbord 61 14 54 00. | Switchboard: +47 61 14 54 00. | +-------------------------------+------------------------------------+ From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Aug 2 18:48:42 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E68F5BACC26 for ; Tue, 2 Aug 2016 18:48:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from trond@fagskolen.gjovik.no) Received: from smtp.fagskolen.gjovik.no (smtp.fagskolen.gjovik.no [IPv6:2001:700:1100:1:200:ff:fe00:b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.fagskolen.gjovik.no", Issuer "Fagskolen i Gj??vik" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 737E015E3 for ; Tue, 2 Aug 2016 18:48:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from trond@fagskolen.gjovik.no) Received: from mail.fig.ol.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.fig.ol.no (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id u72ImY0g003950 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 2 Aug 2016 20:48:34 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from trond@fagskolen.gjovik.no) Received: from localhost (trond@localhost) by mail.fig.ol.no (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) with ESMTP id u72ImYx2003947; Tue, 2 Aug 2016 20:48:34 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from trond@fagskolen.gjovik.no) X-Authentication-Warning: mail.fig.ol.no: trond owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 20:48:34 +0200 (CEST) From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Trond_Endrest=F8l?= Sender: Trond.Endrestol@fagskolen.gjovik.no To: Doug McIntyre cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD-10.3-RELEASE-amd64-memstick.img broken? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20160802184142.GA45983@geeks.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (BSF 67 2015-01-07) Organization: Fagskolen Innlandet OpenPGP: url=http://fig.ol.no/~trond/trond.key MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on mail.fig.ol.no Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2016 18:48:43 -0000 On Tue, 2 Aug 2016 20:45+0200, Trond Endrestøl wrote: > On Tue, 2 Aug 2016 13:41-0500, Doug McIntyre wrote: > > > I've tried several times to have systems boot off of > > FreeBSD-10.3-RELEASE-amd64-memstick.img > > > > I've been quite successful with 10.0 through 10.2 boot sticks. > > I just downloaded FreeBSD-10.2-RELEASE-amd64-memstick.img and did > > the same stick, same actions to burn it and boot it, and it worked fine. > > > > I think the official RELEASE of 10.3 amd64 memstick image is broken? > > > > What I get is > > > > Error 1 > > LBA 1339168 Invalid Format > > > > and then a boot prompt, that fails to boot further. > > > > I seem to have good copies. > > > > tritium:~> shasum -a 512 FreeBSD-10.3-RELEASE-amd64-memstick.img > > 94f7708ac5b0e744c9dc40f19b45a2f6d0ac87f0ce0e3cd5c084a5d860ac16c3a3e167b04d4354faf9a70ef2836925518f072bc6b03147a1672ffb7790644b5f FreeBSD-10.3-RELEASE-amd64-memstick.img > > > > which matches the SHA512 of the announcement > > https://www.freebsd.org/releases/10.3R/announce.html > > > > even so, I've tried downloading it from 3 mirrors and got all the same copy. > > > > I've tried multiple systems, multiple sticks and multiple machines to > > burn it. For the life of me, I can not make 10.3 RELEASE amd64 > > memstick boot, but I can for 10.2, 10.1 & 10.0 with no problems on any of > > the cobinations of any of the hardware I have. > > > > Does anybody else have problems booting off this memory stick image? > > You might need correct the primary and secondary GPT's on the memstick > by running: > > gpart recover da0 # or da1, etc > > It's due to your memstick being larger than the image. No, I'm wrong. The advice above applies only to FreeBSD-10.3-RELEASE-amd64-uefi-memstick.img. -- +-------------------------------+------------------------------------+ | Vennlig hilsen, | Best regards, | | Trond Endrestøl, | Trond Endrestøl, | | IT-ansvarlig, | System administrator, | | Fagskolen Innlandet, | Gjøvik Technical College, Norway, | | tlf. mob. 952 62 567, | Cellular...: +47 952 62 567, | | sentralbord 61 14 54 00. | Switchboard: +47 61 14 54 00. | +-------------------------------+------------------------------------+ From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Aug 2 19:03:51 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB263BAC1C8 for ; Tue, 2 Aug 2016 19:03:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@skysmurf.nl) Received: from mail.skysmurf.nl (spectrum.skysmurf.nl [83.162.175.214]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.skysmurf.nl", Issuer "mail.skysmurf.nl" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2AAF11EB5 for ; Tue, 2 Aug 2016 19:03:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@skysmurf.nl) Received: from spectrum.skysmurf.nl (mail.skysmurf.nl [192.168.42.4]) by mail.skysmurf.nl (8.15.2/8.15.2) with SMTP id u72J3kqD039066; Tue, 2 Aug 2016 21:03:46 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@skysmurf.nl) Received: by spectrum.skysmurf.nl (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 02 Aug 2016 21:03:46 +0200 Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 21:03:46 +0200 From: Alphons van Werven To: Tim Daneliuk Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: thumbnail_index Message-ID: <20160802190346.GA38539@spectrum.skysmurf.nl> References: <879b33bb-bcfa-7941-f638-5cba0eb741ce@tundraware.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="pWyiEgJYm5f9v55/" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <879b33bb-bcfa-7941-f638-5cba0eb741ce@tundraware.com> X-PGP-Key: http://www.skysmurf.nl/~fonz/fonz_pubkey.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2016 19:03:51 -0000 --pWyiEgJYm5f9v55/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Tim Daneliuk wrote: > Is there a more modern tool available that does what thumbnail_index does > (from a command line)? To anyone else reading this: Although the OP doesn't specify it, "thumbnail_index" probably refers to the www/thumbnail_index port: % make -C /usr/ports search name=3Dthumbnail_index Port: thumbnail_index-1998.08.10_4 Path: /usr/ports/www/thumbnail_index Info: Make an HTML index file for a bunch of images [snip rest] % cat /usr/ports/www/thumbnail_index/pkg-descr thumbnail_index - make an HTML index file for a bunch of images Run this script in a web directory consisting of all or mostly image files. It'll create an index.html of thumbnail images, putting the thumbnail files in a hidden subdirectory. WWW: http://www.acme.com/software/thumbnail_index/ To the OP: Judging by the description, it sounds pretty straightforward to write a shell script that uses ImageMagick (graphics/ImageMagick*). Feel free to ask if you need help with that. Hope this helps, Fonz --=20 A.J. "Fonz" van Werven mailsig: Help! I'm a prisoner in a Chinese fortune cookie factory. --pWyiEgJYm5f9v55/ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJXoO6SAAoJEAfP7gJTaCe8imIQAJYSJou+gCOdKqXr/GSHLYL7 0Ut51sH4Qhp65X9q/Sa3YOmb6ESVgvsAxFLOzEdaEBCydnsk13qETHq49mqn3klT IZnajlwg+h7OvjN73o6zpNCbzOmBKe+U/38P2ztJoJCI+zAwlSLKbvYiOpRDZipB hsDvSEb5zDiLlAt5HahFma/VeTWlNsxsXSyusiczD6q/Uv5uqwErhMO9ggyS4Qa2 ne/qKk3IpHCID/0QE2oj8jXDzHKYnd09PNgLuTsj4JdTGme878RM0yuiAVO6YlMM 3blj/gykN6Oqs4gfAcUgfckNKUlyIoEYYAfULTAd5NJGfFiDQhETwkf2pLkRzp7Z 2wWNLB9weNEkHKhRNiMxG7zN1/z2LXrJ7xFW+ITZZBckgSpfPPhJR2H6/Jpe6Pju 411TKwhy7kaqEJ53J/9sUZCNezRcdbpt3uL5/kXm1r2rLmpwK4IIrH3MEz77AYPw eSQL/r17d2QypEeL2Kgb7Pu/z155CynPOE3l2FSYMDOPk++4V/CTDwWqu0NLfQnX GhmvhmqQgLWwqcbUNoEjwhjQFmafP9niSUs4HmbDuDDkC/5cFXJanxDYtugfa/lO smmTf4h0Nft18deOFX/KtLtMBLoNFrQHWD0FdC0oPEpFco0eJahtlDdnj99+UEhI AotyI7J0Hn4lewS6kAE2 =ifeU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --pWyiEgJYm5f9v55/-- From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Aug 2 20:17:43 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B37DBAD907 for ; Tue, 2 Aug 2016 20:17:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 438DF1DBE for ; Tue, 2 Aug 2016 20:17:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-102-47.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.102.47]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 339423CE39; Tue, 2 Aug 2016 22:08:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id u72K85TX002068; Tue, 2 Aug 2016 22:08:05 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 22:08:05 +0200 From: Polytropon To: Alphons van Werven Cc: Tim Daneliuk , FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: thumbnail_index Message-Id: <20160802220805.c1003843.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20160802190346.GA38539@spectrum.skysmurf.nl> References: <879b33bb-bcfa-7941-f638-5cba0eb741ce@tundraware.com> <20160802190346.GA38539@spectrum.skysmurf.nl> Reply-To: Polytropon Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2016 20:17:43 -0000 On Tue, 2 Aug 2016 21:03:46 +0200, Alphons van Werven wrote: > Tim Daneliuk wrote: > > > Is there a more modern tool available that does what thumbnail_index does > > (from a command line)? > > To anyone else reading this: > > Although the OP doesn't specify it, "thumbnail_index" probably refers to > the www/thumbnail_index port: > % make -C /usr/ports search name=thumbnail_index > Port: thumbnail_index-1998.08.10_4 > Path: /usr/ports/www/thumbnail_index > Info: Make an HTML index file for a bunch of images > [snip rest] > % cat /usr/ports/www/thumbnail_index/pkg-descr > thumbnail_index - make an HTML index file for a bunch of images > > Run this script in a web directory consisting of all or mostly image > files. It'll create an index.html of thumbnail images, putting > the thumbnail files in a hidden subdirectory. > > WWW: http://www.acme.com/software/thumbnail_index/ > > To the OP: > > Judging by the description, it sounds pretty straightforward to write a > shell script that uses ImageMagick (graphics/ImageMagick*). Feel free to > ask if you need help with that. That's exactly what I did in 2007 when I needed a "quick & dirty" "photo album" web page + thumbnail generator. Even though it's wrong and poorly done in so many ways, it supports CSS for styling the web page which consists of valid HTML. The thumbnail files have the suffix "_s.jpg" ("small"), and the result is put into a directory called "upload" designated for upload. Of course it uses ImagaMagic's "convert" command and has all the stuff hardcoded... ;-) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Aug 2 21:42:03 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C44CDBA87AA for ; Tue, 2 Aug 2016 21:42:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from merlyn@geeks.org) Received: from mail.geeks.org (mail.geeks.org [IPv6:2001:470:c2ca:1::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A76D61BE9 for ; Tue, 2 Aug 2016 21:42:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from merlyn@geeks.org) Received: from mail.geeks.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by after-clamsmtpd.geeks.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94191110235; Tue, 2 Aug 2016 16:42:02 -0500 (CDT) Received: by mail.geeks.org (Postfix, from userid 1003) id 71B9F110234; Tue, 2 Aug 2016 16:42:02 -0500 (CDT) Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 16:42:02 -0500 From: Doug McIntyre To: Trond =?iso-8859-1?Q?Endrest=F8l?= Cc: Doug McIntyre , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD-10.3-RELEASE-amd64-memstick.img broken? Message-ID: <20160802214202.GA46160@geeks.org> References: <20160802184142.GA45983@geeks.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2016 21:42:03 -0000 On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 08:48:34PM +0200, Trond Endrestøl wrote: > On Tue, 2 Aug 2016 20:45+0200, Trond Endrestøl wrote: > > On Tue, 2 Aug 2016 13:41-0500, Doug McIntyre wrote: > > > > > I've tried several times to have systems boot off of > > > FreeBSD-10.3-RELEASE-amd64-memstick.img ... > > > Error 1 > > > LBA 1339168 Invalid Format > > > > > > and then a boot prompt, that fails to boot further. > > You might need correct the primary and secondary GPT's on the memstick > > by running: > > > > gpart recover da0 # or da1, etc > > > > It's due to your memstick being larger than the image. > > No, I'm wrong. The advice above applies only to > FreeBSD-10.3-RELEASE-amd64-uefi-memstick.img. Yep, doesn't seem to be needed.. tritium:> gpart recover da2 da2 recovering is not needed From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Aug 2 22:03:34 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF267BAB29C for ; Tue, 2 Aug 2016 22:03:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tundra@tundraware.com) Received: from oceanview.tundraware.com (oceanview.tundraware.com [45.55.60.57]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "oceanview.tundraware.com", Issuer "oceanview.tundraware.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E0D813D9 for ; Tue, 2 Aug 2016 22:03:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tundra@tundraware.com) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (ozzie.tundraware.com [75.145.138.73]) (authenticated bits=0) by oceanview.tundraware.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id u72M33al013118 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 2 Aug 2016 17:03:03 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from tundra@tundraware.com) Subject: Re: thumbnail_index To: Polytropon , Alphons van Werven References: <879b33bb-bcfa-7941-f638-5cba0eb741ce@tundraware.com> <20160802190346.GA38539@spectrum.skysmurf.nl> <20160802220805.c1003843.freebsd@edvax.de> Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List From: Tim Daneliuk Message-ID: <5b5629fe-2ae3-cd1d-a609-dbba89acdf05@tundraware.com> Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 17:02:58 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160802220805.c1003843.freebsd@edvax.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (oceanview.tundraware.com [45.55.60.57]); Tue, 02 Aug 2016 17:03:03 -0500 (CDT) X-TundraWare-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-TundraWare-MailScanner-ID: u72M33al013118 X-TundraWare-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-TundraWare-MailScanner-From: tundra@tundraware.com X-Spam-Status: No X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2016 22:03:35 -0000 On 08/02/2016 03:08 PM, Polytropon wrote: >> To the OP: >> > >> > Judging by the description, it sounds pretty straightforward to write a >> > shell script that uses ImageMagick (graphics/ImageMagick*). Feel free to >> > ask if you need help with that. I sort of figured that's would the answer would be. Perhaps when I get time, I may do just that .... -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Tim Daneliuk tundra@tundraware.com PGP Key: http://www.tundraware.com/PGP/ From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Aug 2 22:11:23 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7830BBAB4D2 for ; Tue, 2 Aug 2016 22:11:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from mail-wm0-x234.google.com (mail-wm0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 342E7175F for ; Tue, 2 Aug 2016 22:11:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: by mail-wm0-x234.google.com with SMTP id o80so309919090wme.1 for ; Tue, 02 Aug 2016 15:11:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bris-ac-uk.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:message-id:to:subject:reply-to; bh=yffqu15AUOUjdZ5xI5r2ghjrbJx2LTJ9DuzT6fmDBlQ=; b=XV8lYfDJ0FGFKN6GkFhQwGmxwksY4mBz5z1Fr6HtmQjB2Nz8M5mo5VO40r86Q+kcX4 PwrsZY7H0oda0MCZzH3Stfajj2VZI7TWQFikxC+gxgK3LWZuXQCXXEIjGOdSHqhqYSjm Bp83kZ8nrrBC5RWh9RToc2wTRpwPuJts2z3zfLorzpPbcav4mLnkO4lBbWs/SS284K/1 LornSTeGFI90HMFTqsC/+i27rGPqWAHPxCp8h045sbJrAXaA1TP5nGCAqyCoREA+ub6p 71RZRjqCyOS4sF3mFCtUs2J77LATQ/kav75Sk7DautIBytsG3A2u+bRwb9HTgZMGX8Bf q9XQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:message-id:to:subject:reply-to; bh=yffqu15AUOUjdZ5xI5r2ghjrbJx2LTJ9DuzT6fmDBlQ=; b=TIqD5+Hz+R1+bEE797OzRSddjkfu4xOAiJOuRWUSN6AVj13tdJd5HDWlpqO2nMddWP HtU6IaemaAMwjo3QysaOi9oFk1hD3Rx8sh3IFUU8lBFka+CwJN+u6CwhOI5+JYJxvkPM XkA0a0p0FCjTuBassP2QsIs+5a60LMJ7Kmt6Ojh1WT9qhKTYf2nCwj4O4vmr342orqrl IUehiUbM9gE9KETqzHZaf0D6zQVZx+skAcQRk7mfRV4bxYsN2W18ZEDU0CyIFp3O2U6H cvMT0rgDRQ2k7yKoD7Rce8OrH2TeB1N43Tjn8VBqdjdXu0mL9lo7vU2ps3dbJbO3K3Dc aXYg== X-Gm-Message-State: AEkooutjAW2VaibO31IJ2P4lMij0nGnags7kwTOlqazAbAiwBAf1lC6TxSbEM2jogK4l/BXI X-Received: by 10.194.222.233 with SMTP id qp9mr65448952wjc.175.1470175880130; Tue, 02 Aug 2016 15:11:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk (mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk. [137.222.170.4]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id bw9sm4540534wjc.33.2016.08.02.15.11.19 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 02 Aug 2016 15:11:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u72MBIbr079330 for ; Tue, 2 Aug 2016 23:11:18 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mexas@mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id u72MBIxR079329 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 2 Aug 2016 23:11:18 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mexas) Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 23:11:18 +0100 (BST) From: Anton Shterenlikht Message-Id: <201608022211.u72MBIxR079329@mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: wireless hints: AP, username, password - does not work Reply-To: mexas@bris.ac.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2016 22:11:23 -0000 I need to use my FreeBSD 11-current laptop in a new environment where all I'm given is the access point (AP) name, the username and the password. The local help is not great. I'm told my browser should "automatically" point me to a page where I enter the username and the password. For starters I'm not familiar with username/password for wireless authentication. My /etc/wpa_supplicant.conf* files either point to a cert file, and use identity/password, or are just: network={ ssid="..." psk="..." } How can this work with a username/password pair? When I use ifconfig_wlan0="DHCP WPA" I cannot connect. If I use just ifconfig_wlan0="DHCP" I can connect to the AP, and get the ip address, but cannot connect anywhere else. I guess they are using some weird MS only setup? Anything else I can try to get connected? Thanks Anton From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Aug 2 22:41:34 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49F5BBABD22 for ; Tue, 2 Aug 2016 22:41:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from woodsb02@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yw0-x22d.google.com (mail-yw0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 082161AB0 for ; Tue, 2 Aug 2016 22:41:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from woodsb02@gmail.com) Received: by mail-yw0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id u134so212205259ywg.3 for ; Tue, 02 Aug 2016 15:41:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=UCtwM51ubK71iyBJrZtsg1px6w7toY6EpgtU2nIRX68=; b=utKMgfLAErZZ7yit7a/7tISBKwp2diBlr1p4k3ThTPfTquPMWskxSk5+hw8y1ox5sg 9evAlQ/vnniCKjZWIxOPKbl3ChW/jTrdw3zuAyJGfZV78c3QM3nmAXqW9j9PJ5qfBEL/ sEj7dhTFpNJM35mUbjfiGmmEhM78JfU8gbIwRuGXplpRjqlrxPEswj9aDAHVnRUA02ee bvNtXX2UwhSlPVHliUrqcto4CqvDf6e9qGLgxseZS6M7TE/mNQYtGcH1IZXVNUyZjycB fCEDZiREz/r5Dxl0workO/Q2Y6sPd/2lbvSPSxX8j2TL+R067AEtnZubIEf7NfpaOsF8 a9ww== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=UCtwM51ubK71iyBJrZtsg1px6w7toY6EpgtU2nIRX68=; b=hcP2Q89wCdCTUTtdFZL20uqX8NZ8uUf0Xb23LXfnPgnpSRB3jPLZp1pYvswUoy9WqR W+NrgtQaTOMsEW0zBvSkaS/jhbNKdY+J5Z0uIPFqjxEmIgiTVx1OT6VWPqsgLm9Jneq/ c2TwIIXKcvHVOIVuXggchaVEzZFE1cnLLk2mXVfXJVp4XvSQjgp2+/nwVIBnHczEB+uF Fz0M1BXeDFnFTI74OS64+0TJ9XjFc5VlWlmxQlKEv0r9f08eMn/ZuXZ2BVcmtug3yWHC qCBVvVerAjnPhs+VL7qJYJ/HXU2v5TID0vtfuECbevnAQd3hmoc9vf3gH+6GYc17L9ET 0JYA== X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoouuGoCgcRvcHu4gwV7r1c2J4Oc3sG7380Q9n/ZOVusacJnM8/xZvpP1zH27Vw3k1Wf1RQGYyTIiMVKbMKg== X-Received: by 10.13.249.135 with SMTP id j129mr16149863ywf.267.1470177693138; Tue, 02 Aug 2016 15:41:33 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.37.199.65 with HTTP; Tue, 2 Aug 2016 15:41:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <201608022211.u72MBIxR079329@mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk> References: <201608022211.u72MBIxR079329@mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk> From: Ben Woods Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2016 06:41:32 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: wireless hints: AP, username, password - does not work To: "mexas@bris.ac.uk" Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2016 22:41:34 -0000 On Wednesday, 3 August 2016, Anton Shterenlikht > wrote: > I need to use my FreeBSD 11-current laptop > in a new environment where all I'm given is > the access point (AP) name, the username and the password. > The local help is not great. > I'm told my browser should "automatically" point me > to a page where I enter the username and the password. > > For starters I'm not familiar with username/password > for wireless authentication. > My /etc/wpa_supplicant.conf* files either > point to a cert file, and use identity/password, > or are just: > > network={ > ssid="..." > psk="..." > } > > How can this work with a username/password pair? > > When I use ifconfig_wlan0="DHCP WPA" I cannot connect. > > If I use just ifconfig_wlan0="DHCP" I can connect to the AP, > and get the ip address, but cannot connect anywhere else. > > I guess they are using some weird MS only setup? > Anything else I can try to get connected? > > Thanks > > Anton > Hi Anton, This sounds like it may be an open (unsecured) wifi, with adaptive portal to redirect your initial web traffic to a web page requesting a username and password. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Captive_portal This is often used in airports / large coffee retail chains and is most easily recognisable by the way it is presented in many mobile phones. When they scan for wifi networks, there is one available to connect to which does not have a padlock next to it. Once they connect to the wifi, they will be associated to the AP and have an IP address, but network traffic initially doesn't work. Shortly after connecting, many phones automatically pop-up a website prompting for the username and password to enter. On FreeBSD, it is as you said. Assuming you have atheros, put the following in your /etc/rc.conf (replacing your_ssid_here with the wifi SSID): wlans_ath0="wlan0" ifconfig_wlan0="ssid *your_ssid_here* DHCP" Run: # service netif restart Once you are connected and have an IP address, open your browser and navigate to any webpage which DOESNT USE HTTPS. I commonly use www.distrowatch.com, but any others you know which don't use https will work. This is the part that tricks many people, as the captive portal will redirect all web traffic to the portal until authenticated, but https traffic will detect the server is not who they are supposed to be and fail. Once authenticated, you should get a connection. Note that if can be easier to connect with a mobile phone to confirm how it should work, and what the SSID is etc, and then replicate on your FreeBSD laptop. Good luck! -Ben -- -- From: Benjamin Woods woodsb02@gmail.com From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Aug 2 23:43:51 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20D3DBACFFE for ; Tue, 2 Aug 2016 23:43:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jon@radel.com) Received: from radel.com (fly.radel.com [70.184.242.170]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.radel.com", Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF9571BDA for ; Tue, 2 Aug 2016 23:43:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jon@radel.com) X-CGP-ClamAV-Result: CLEAN X-VirusScanner: Niversoft's CGPClamav Helper v1.18.7 (ClamAV engine v0.98.7) Received: from [2001:470:880a:4389:15ed:26:68d2:cb24] (account jon@radel.com HELO gravenstein.local) by radel.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.1.10 _community_) with ESMTPSA id 1130515; Tue, 02 Aug 2016 22:43:40 +0000 Subject: Re: wireless hints: AP, username, password - does not work To: mexas@bris.ac.uk, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <201608022211.u72MBIxR079329@mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk> From: Jon Radel Message-ID: Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 18:43:40 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <201608022211.u72MBIxR079329@mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk> Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha-256; boundary="------------ms070100080709050702080204" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2016 23:43:51 -0000 This is a cryptographically signed message in MIME format. --------------ms070100080709050702080204 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 8/2/16 6:11 PM, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > I need to use my FreeBSD 11-current laptop > in a new environment where all I'm given is > the access point (AP) name, the username and the password. > The local help is not great. > I'm told my browser should "automatically" point me > to a page where I enter the username and the password. Try treating it as an open AP and fire up a browser. What they're probably describing is the ability for many APs to redirect / discard all traffic from a new MAC, where HTTP/HTTPS is redirected to an HTTP authentication page on the AP itself. After you authenticate, it actually routes your traffic. --=20 --Jon Radel jon@radel.com --------------ms070100080709050702080204 Content-Type: application/pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s" Content-Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExDzANBglghkgBZQMEAgEFADCABgkqhkiG9w0BBwEAAKCC Cq8wggSvMIIDl6ADAgECAhEA4CPLFRKDU4mtYW56VGdrITANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQsFADBvMQsw CQYDVQQGEwJTRTEUMBIGA1UEChMLQWRkVHJ1c3QgQUIxJjAkBgNVBAsTHUFkZFRydXN0IEV4 dGVybmFsIFRUUCBOZXR3b3JrMSIwIAYDVQQDExlBZGRUcnVzdCBFeHRlcm5hbCBDQSBSb290 MB4XDTE0MTIyMjAwMDAwMFoXDTIwMDUzMDEwNDgzOFowgZsxCzAJBgNVBAYTAkdCMRswGQYD VQQIExJHcmVhdGVyIE1hbmNoZXN0ZXIxEDAOBgNVBAcTB1NhbGZvcmQxGjAYBgNVBAoTEUNP TU9ETyBDQSBMaW1pdGVkMUEwPwYDVQQDEzhDT01PRE8gU0hBLTI1NiBDbGllbnQgQXV0aGVu dGljYXRpb24gYW5kIFNlY3VyZSBFbWFpbCBDQTCCASIwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADggEPADCC AQoCggEBAImxDdp6UxlOcFIdvFamBia3uEngludRq/HwWhNJFaO0jBtgvHpRQqd5jKQi3xdh TpHVdiMKFNNKAn+2HQmAbqUEPdm6uxb+oYepLkNSQxZ8rzJQyKZPWukI2M+TJZx7iOgwZOak +FaA/SokFDMXmaxE5WmLo0YGS8Iz1OlAnwawsayTQLm1CJM6nCpToxDbPSBhPFUDjtlOdiUC ISn6o3xxdk/u4V+B6ftUgNvDezVSt4TeIj0sMC0xf1m9UjewM2ktQ+v61qXxl3dnUYzZ7ifr vKUHOHaMpKk4/9+M9QOsSb7K93OZOg8yq5yVOhM9DkY6V3RhUL7GQD/L5OKfoiECAwEAAaOC ARcwggETMB8GA1UdIwQYMBaAFK29mHo0tCb3+sQmVO8DveAky1QaMB0GA1UdDgQWBBSSYWuC 4aKgqk/sZ/HCo/e0gADB7DAOBgNVHQ8BAf8EBAMCAYYwEgYDVR0TAQH/BAgwBgEB/wIBADAd BgNVHSUEFjAUBggrBgEFBQcDAgYIKwYBBQUHAwQwEQYDVR0gBAowCDAGBgRVHSAAMEQGA1Ud HwQ9MDswOaA3oDWGM2h0dHA6Ly9jcmwudXNlcnRydXN0LmNvbS9BZGRUcnVzdEV4dGVybmFs Q0FSb290LmNybDA1BggrBgEFBQcBAQQpMCcwJQYIKwYBBQUHMAGGGWh0dHA6Ly9vY3NwLnVz ZXJ0cnVzdC5jb20wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQELBQADggEBABsqbqxVwTqriMXY7c1V86prYSvACRAj mQ/FZmpvsfW0tXdeDwJhAN99Bf4Ss6SAgAD8+x1banICCkG8BbrBWNUmwurVTYT7/oKYz1gb 4yJjnFL4uwU2q31Ypd6rO2Pl2tVz7+zg+3vio//wQiOcyraNTT7kSxgDsqgt1Ni7QkuQaYUQ 26Y3NOh74AEQpZzKOsefT4g0bopl0BqKu6ncyso20fT8wmQpNa/WsadxEdIDQ7GPPprsnjJT 9HaSyoY0B7ksyuYcStiZDcGG4pCS+1pCaiMhEOllx/XVu37qjIUgAmLq0ToHLFnFmTPyOInl tukWeh95FPZKEBom+nyK+5swggX4MIIE4KADAgECAhBzVOU8fWu0zQ1gaQ38zgEbMA0GCSqG SIb3DQEBCwUAMIGbMQswCQYDVQQGEwJHQjEbMBkGA1UECBMSR3JlYXRlciBNYW5jaGVzdGVy MRAwDgYDVQQHEwdTYWxmb3JkMRowGAYDVQQKExFDT01PRE8gQ0EgTGltaXRlZDFBMD8GA1UE AxM4Q09NT0RPIFNIQS0yNTYgQ2xpZW50IEF1dGhlbnRpY2F0aW9uIGFuZCBTZWN1cmUgRW1h aWwgQ0EwHhcNMTUwMzMwMDAwMDAwWhcNMTgwMzI5MjM1OTU5WjCB+jELMAkGA1UEBhMCVVMx DjAMBgNVBBETBTIyMTUwMQswCQYDVQQIEwJWQTEUMBIGA1UEBxMLU3ByaW5nZmllbGQxGjAY BgNVBAkTETY5MTcgUmlkZ2V3YXkgRHIuMRUwEwYDVQQKEwxKb24gVC4gUmFkZWwxMjAwBgNV BAsTKUlzc3VlZCB0aHJvdWdoIEpvbiBULiBSYWRlbCBFLVBLSSBNYW5hZ2VyMR8wHQYDVQQL ExZDb3Jwb3JhdGUgU2VjdXJlIEVtYWlsMRIwEAYDVQQDEwlKb24gUmFkZWwxHDAaBgkqhkiG 9w0BCQEWDWpvbkByYWRlbC5jb20wggEiMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4IBDwAwggEKAoIBAQDe 1Rth9hbQqaODn++C5dVAQH9nM2VH3oPazZufOwmIG2SXI/v3PuemcQQ3JkhmpQ06gYszyXbk TCLsqvEfalYj81jdt/K5lT4aVdj0LfJIWyTcU95V2rsCuHsSvn/PnIcsEtXg53rCtqS4EOtJ 9u3rY2hP8YCiyz1yY3mn4nKJs93MHG4AkXYuVpzfaIADETcVrA+razvXEfnDJXXDZZ9ZuuV1 06yIovOvhYWSlaVu8nrSHJjXFZI2IXwgIeVBoMih3yu6LLj14I/YdZ0rIA8K+UNB+NW6Ri3u wHXBbr4jh3ZqkrqIVUrf1VeybhdrJcdqXdMNHjKDSlCoaxYRbLy1AgMBAAGjggHVMIIB0TAf BgNVHSMEGDAWgBSSYWuC4aKgqk/sZ/HCo/e0gADB7DAdBgNVHQ4EFgQUz9YB10WEfBNHskRw o/0vh8qaQuwwDgYDVR0PAQH/BAQDAgWgMAwGA1UdEwEB/wQCMAAwHQYDVR0lBBYwFAYIKwYB BQUHAwQGCCsGAQUFBwMCMEYGA1UdIAQ/MD0wOwYMKwYBBAGyMQECAQMFMCswKQYIKwYBBQUH AgEWHWh0dHBzOi8vc2VjdXJlLmNvbW9kby5uZXQvQ1BTMF0GA1UdHwRWMFQwUqBQoE6GTGh0 dHA6Ly9jcmwuY29tb2RvY2EuY29tL0NPTU9ET1NIQTI1NkNsaWVudEF1dGhlbnRpY2F0aW9u YW5kU2VjdXJlRW1haWxDQS5jcmwwgZAGCCsGAQUFBwEBBIGDMIGAMFgGCCsGAQUFBzAChkxo dHRwOi8vY3J0LmNvbW9kb2NhLmNvbS9DT01PRE9TSEEyNTZDbGllbnRBdXRoZW50aWNhdGlv bmFuZFNlY3VyZUVtYWlsQ0EuY3J0MCQGCCsGAQUFBzABhhhodHRwOi8vb2NzcC5jb21vZG9j YS5jb20wGAYDVR0RBBEwD4ENam9uQHJhZGVsLmNvbTANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQsFAAOCAQEAS1Pe +gBgP+SQ/a5I5e7zX0Rg0DhH378LHlZixJgS6LfCPL2edKMUQi3Th9GXfLjdeyeWuMWoz925 ZzBHcPwkBeH+iM/AEhu0Dhi0kop/p66g9tEPJUZ/KDsqxddNDrD0Typn3/33pHTjJEDqydzA gwB0Nn8blpMbqSwT+j8wuPakfLsj1cSDzXrTLLsmIQB7auAyaYXdWyW8Yqw336rLUCvjOUfn qOOyjVsieTw/0PLoOHJaGyez+VtV4eyi6p1SNiX32A+fvxBMzKQLCokE43cXItc9Okzq//f2 fuvGp17r8mpm4OjjM5E2kwsg9bBPUBMR4/sxosKVLn0o9rxlozGCBEEwggQ9AgEBMIGwMIGb MQswCQYDVQQGEwJHQjEbMBkGA1UECBMSR3JlYXRlciBNYW5jaGVzdGVyMRAwDgYDVQQHEwdT YWxmb3JkMRowGAYDVQQKExFDT01PRE8gQ0EgTGltaXRlZDFBMD8GA1UEAxM4Q09NT0RPIFNI QS0yNTYgQ2xpZW50IEF1dGhlbnRpY2F0aW9uIGFuZCBTZWN1cmUgRW1haWwgQ0ECEHNU5Tx9 a7TNDWBpDfzOARswDQYJYIZIAWUDBAIBBQCgggJhMBgGCSqGSIb3DQEJAzELBgkqhkiG9w0B BwEwHAYJKoZIhvcNAQkFMQ8XDTE2MDgwMjIyNDM0MFowLwYJKoZIhvcNAQkEMSIEINm5XGTw lL3OXLV0H+vlZh/EYErS9qKw8l9iCPYYYD+QMGwGCSqGSIb3DQEJDzFfMF0wCwYJYIZIAWUD BAEqMAsGCWCGSAFlAwQBAjAKBggqhkiG9w0DBzAOBggqhkiG9w0DAgICAIAwDQYIKoZIhvcN AwICAUAwBwYFKw4DAgcwDQYIKoZIhvcNAwICASgwgcEGCSsGAQQBgjcQBDGBszCBsDCBmzEL MAkGA1UEBhMCR0IxGzAZBgNVBAgTEkdyZWF0ZXIgTWFuY2hlc3RlcjEQMA4GA1UEBxMHU2Fs Zm9yZDEaMBgGA1UEChMRQ09NT0RPIENBIExpbWl0ZWQxQTA/BgNVBAMTOENPTU9ETyBTSEEt MjU2IENsaWVudCBBdXRoZW50aWNhdGlvbiBhbmQgU2VjdXJlIEVtYWlsIENBAhBzVOU8fWu0 zQ1gaQ38zgEbMIHDBgsqhkiG9w0BCRACCzGBs6CBsDCBmzELMAkGA1UEBhMCR0IxGzAZBgNV BAgTEkdyZWF0ZXIgTWFuY2hlc3RlcjEQMA4GA1UEBxMHU2FsZm9yZDEaMBgGA1UEChMRQ09N T0RPIENBIExpbWl0ZWQxQTA/BgNVBAMTOENPTU9ETyBTSEEtMjU2IENsaWVudCBBdXRoZW50 aWNhdGlvbiBhbmQgU2VjdXJlIEVtYWlsIENBAhBzVOU8fWu0zQ1gaQ38zgEbMA0GCSqGSIb3 DQEBAQUABIIBALQTMW59n4hf5/Sp+Q6gwkPcmeyaA8Gj5Q+4TdcsAAObCIlidZh13cUUFZzY aZQttBlhMRg0saTzeJVCD0yUPaKn1SvvviPC9fryOuytur9NrbrNak4c41UY1+1Vm3yj8nPW 5YZja8FURxouZ3bq8RBkEyEpmuVeEJJ17A05PXlw7wGSL6k87mrDHCBjuc1yUVfj+XNsiiyh DkxkZvEPymoEjkv2wkqitkBlAzXHz2USRqLTtCVVet6iw3yWB8ZTMruDkGBxSSbMz0KpwebW SNRW6Okg/hdz5y9vjQ6sG41WXbbP/maLdZ7dBsM37pagOmGRTYxmMvtFclFrkPL1OlEAAAAA AAA= --------------ms070100080709050702080204-- From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Aug 3 02:00:52 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AFE2BAC7F2 for ; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 02:00:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nan@chinadtrace.org) Received: from cp-41.webhostbox.net (cp-41.webhostbox.net [209.99.16.15]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C835158D for ; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 02:00:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nan@chinadtrace.org) Received: from ztxe01hpics304.austin.hp.com ([15.65.252.14]:63275 helo=XIAONA1) by cp-41.webhostbox.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.86_1) (envelope-from ) id 1bUlU1-004LAf-Fb for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 03 Aug 2016 02:00:34 +0000 Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2016 10:00:33 +0800 From: "Nan Xiao" To: freebsd-questions Subject: A question about using "vmstat" to get the memory use info of kernel X-Priority: 3 X-GUID: E35D8419-5064-4613-8A33-E9CDAEDC91A5 X-Has-Attach: no X-Mailer: Foxmail 7, 2, 7, 174[cn] Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <2016080310003073760416@chinadtrace.org> X-Authenticated_sender: nan@chinadtrace.org X-OutGoing-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - cp-41.webhostbox.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - chinadtrace.org X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: cp-41.webhostbox.net: authenticated_id: nan@chinadtrace.org X-Authenticated-Sender: cp-41.webhostbox.net: nan@chinadtrace.org X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2016 02:00:52 -0000 SGkgYWxsLA0KDQpNeSBGcmVlQlNEIGlzIGluc3RhbGxlZCBvbiBWTVdhcmUgVmlydHVhbCBNYWNo aW5lIG9mIG15IGRlc2t0b3AsIGFuZCB0aGUgdmVyc2lvbiBpcyBhcyBmb2xsb3dzOiAgDQoNCiMg dW5hbWUgLWENCkZyZWVCU0QgRnJlZUJTRCAxMC4zLVJFTEVBU0UtcDUgRnJlZUJTRCAxMC4zLVJF TEVBU0UtcDUgIzA6IFR1ZSBKdWwgMTkgMTc6NTI6NTcgQ1NUIDIwMTYgICAgIHJvb3RARnJlZUJT RDovdXNyL29iai91c3Ivc3JjL3N5cy9OQU5fRklSU1RfQlVJTEQgIGFtZDY0DQoNCkkgaGF2ZSBp bnN0YWxsZWQgYSAiaGVsbG8iIGRyaXZlciwgYW5kIHVzZSAidm1zdGF0IiBjb21tYW5kIHRvIGNo ZWNrIGl0cyBidWZmZXIgaW5mbzogIA0KDQojIHZtc3RhdCAtbSB8IGhlYWQgLW4gMSAmJiB2bXN0 YXQgLW0gfCBncmVwICJoZWxsbyINCiAgICAgICAgIFR5cGUgSW5Vc2UgTWVtVXNlIEhpZ2hVc2Ug UmVxdWVzdHMgIFNpemUocykNCiBoZWxsb19idWZmZXIgICAgIDEgICAgIDFLICAgICAgIC0gICAg ICAgIDEgIDI1Ng0KIyB2bXN0YXQgLW0gfCBoZWFkIC1uIDEgJiYgdm1zdGF0IC1tIHwgZ3JlcCAi aGVsbG8iDQogICAgICAgICBUeXBlIEluVXNlIE1lbVVzZSBIaWdoVXNlIFJlcXVlc3RzICBTaXpl KHMpDQogaGVsbG9fYnVmZmVyICAgICAxICAgICAxSyAgICAgICAtICAgICAgICAxICAyNTYNCiMg dm1zdGF0IC1tIHwgaGVhZCAtbiAxICYmIHZtc3RhdCAtbSB8IGdyZXAgImhlbGxvIg0KICAgICAg ICAgVHlwZSBJblVzZSBNZW1Vc2UgSGlnaFVzZSBSZXF1ZXN0cyAgU2l6ZShzKQ0KIyB2bXN0YXQg LW0gfCBoZWFkIC1uIDEgJiYgdm1zdGF0IC1tIHwgZ3JlcCAiaGVsbG8iDQogICAgICAgICBUeXBl IEluVXNlIE1lbVVzZSBIaWdoVXNlIFJlcXVlc3RzICBTaXplKHMpDQogaGVsbG9fYnVmZmVyICAg ICAxICAgICAxSyAgICAgICAtICAgICAgICAxICAyNTYNCg0KSSBleGVjdXRlICJ2bXN0YXQgLW0g fCBoZWFkIC1uIDEgJiYgdm1zdGF0IC1tIHwgZ3JlcCAiaGVsbG8iIiBjb21tYW5kIDQgdGltZXMg Y29udGludW91c2x5LCBidXQgdGhlIG91dHB1dHMgYXJlIGRpZmZlcmVudC4gSSBhbSBzdXJlIHRo ZSAiaGVsbG8iIG1vZHVsZQ0KaXMgaWRsZSBkdXJpbmcgdGhlIHRpbWUuIFdoeSBkb2VzIHRoZSBj b21tYW5kIG91dHB1dCBkaWZmZXJlbnRseT8NCg0KVGhhbmtzIHZlcnkgbXVjaCBpbiBhZHZhbmNl IQ0KDQoNCkJlc3QgUmVnYXJkcw0KTmFuIFhpYW8gKOiClualoCkNClNreXBlOiB4aWFvbmFuMTk4 MzA4MTgNCkphYmJlci9YTVBQOiBuYW54aWFvQHhtcHAucnUubmV0IA0KVGVsZWdyYW06IG5hbnhp YW8NClBlcnNvbmFsIHdlYnNpdGUgKENoaW5lc2UpOiBodHRwOi8vbmFueGlhby5tZS8gDQpQZXJz b25hbCB3ZWJzaXRlIChFbmdsaXNoKTogaHR0cDovL25hbnhpYW8ubWUvZW4gDQpDaGluZXNlIERU cmFjZSB3ZWJzaXRlOiBodHRwOi8vY2hpbmFkdHJhY2Uub3JnLw0K From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Aug 3 02:33:27 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F0F4BACF3B for ; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 02:33:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from support514@sender339.f.wsztest.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 413161546 for ; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 02:33:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from support514@sender339.f.wsztest.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 3CC1FBACF3A; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 02:33:27 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C6C4BACF39 for ; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 02:33:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from support514@sender339.f.wsztest.com) Received: from mail366.wsztest.com (mail366.wsztest.com [113.10.242.249]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B0D46153B for ; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 02:33:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from support514@sender339.f.wsztest.com) Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2016 10:33:20 +0800 To: questions@freebsd.org From: JSD PCB -- CoCo -- be always with you ! Reply-To: coco@jsdpcb.com Subject: JSD ** Professional PCB Manufacturer ** Germany Quality, China Price ** Message-ID: <611aeddfa633ee8f1b7a4a6a5e6e95c8@mail366.wsztest.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2016 02:33:27 -0000 From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Aug 3 03:43:00 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B321FBACFAD for ; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 03:43:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wam@hiwaay.net) Received: from fly.hiwaay.net (fly.hiwaay.net [216.180.54.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 737A61694 for ; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 03:43:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wam@hiwaay.net) Received: from kabini1.local (dynamic-216-186-209-65.knology.net [216.186.209.65] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by fly.hiwaay.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/fly) with ESMTP id u733gpTx007084 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 2 Aug 2016 22:42:52 -0500 To: FreeBSD Questions !!!! From: "William A. Mahaffey III" Subject: Ominous smartd messages .... Message-ID: Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 22:48:21 -0453.75 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2016 03:43:00 -0000 I have a workstation, recently (within the last 12 mos.) purpose built that is my dev. box for in house software (CFD code & user interface). It has 8 1 TB HDD's in a ZFS unmirrored pool. All data is backed up nightly by rsunc to other boxen on my LAN & weekly by compressed tar to those boxen as well. This A.M., I noticed some messages on the console from smartd about 1 of the HDDs. I tailed my syslog file & see the following: [root@devbox, /etc, 9:42:37pm] 360 % tail -50 /var/log/messages ; hwclock -r ; date Jul 26 05:11:34 devbox kernel: pid 39865 (time), uid 1110: exited on signal 6 Jul 26 05:22:29 devbox kernel: pid 41916 (PreBFCGL.opteron.TE), uid 1110: exited on signal 6 (core dumped) Jul 26 05:22:41 devbox kernel: pid 41953 (PreBFCGL.opteron.TE), uid 1110: exited on signal 6 (core dumped) Jul 26 05:22:52 devbox kernel: pid 41990 (PreBFCGL.opteron.TE), uid 1110: exited on signal 6 (core dumped) Jul 26 22:51:42 devbox healthd: A value of 1.64 for CPU #0 Core Voltage with a range of (1.65 <= n <= 2.30) Jul 27 06:30:56 devbox kernel: pid 71015 (memcheck-amd64-free), uid 1110: exited on signal 6 Jul 27 06:30:56 devbox kernel: pid 71014 (time), uid 1110: exited on signal 6 Jul 27 06:41:44 devbox kernel: pid 73053 (PreBFCGL.opteron.TE), uid 1110: exited on signal 6 (core dumped) Jul 27 06:41:55 devbox kernel: pid 73090 (PreBFCGL.opteron.TE), uid 1110: exited on signal 6 (core dumped) Jul 27 06:42:07 devbox kernel: pid 73127 (PreBFCGL.opteron.TE), uid 1110: exited on signal 6 (core dumped) Jul 28 05:10:56 devbox kernel: pid 2029 (memcheck-amd64-free), uid 1110: exited on signal 6 Jul 28 05:10:56 devbox kernel: pid 2028 (time), uid 1110: exited on signal 6 Jul 28 05:21:41 devbox kernel: pid 4067 (PreBFCGL.opteron.TE), uid 1110: exited on signal 6 (core dumped) Jul 28 05:21:51 devbox kernel: pid 4104 (PreBFCGL.opteron.TE), uid 1110: exited on signal 6 (core dumped) Jul 28 05:22:02 devbox kernel: pid 4141 (PreBFCGL.opteron.TE), uid 1110: exited on signal 6 (core dumped) Jul 29 06:30:46 devbox kernel: pid 33158 (memcheck-amd64-free), uid 1110: exited on signal 6 Jul 29 06:30:47 devbox kernel: pid 33157 (time), uid 1110: exited on signal 6 Jul 29 06:41:39 devbox kernel: pid 35197 (PreBFCGL.opteron.TE), uid 1110: exited on signal 6 (core dumped) Jul 29 06:41:51 devbox kernel: pid 35234 (PreBFCGL.opteron.TE), uid 1110: exited on signal 6 (core dumped) Jul 29 06:42:01 devbox kernel: pid 35271 (PreBFCGL.opteron.TE), uid 1110: exited on signal 6 (core dumped) Jul 30 05:10:54 devbox kernel: pid 64110 (memcheck-amd64-free), uid 1110: exited on signal 6 Jul 30 05:10:54 devbox kernel: pid 64109 (time), uid 1110: exited on signal 6 Jul 30 05:21:44 devbox kernel: pid 66149 (PreBFCGL.opteron.TE), uid 1110: exited on signal 6 (core dumped) Jul 30 05:21:55 devbox kernel: pid 66186 (PreBFCGL.opteron.TE), uid 1110: exited on signal 6 (core dumped) Jul 30 05:22:06 devbox kernel: pid 66223 (PreBFCGL.opteron.TE), uid 1110: exited on signal 6 (core dumped) Jul 31 16:18:28 devbox kernel: pid 96421 (memcheck-amd64-free), uid 1110: exited on signal 6 Jul 31 16:18:28 devbox kernel: pid 96420 (time), uid 1110: exited on signal 6 Jul 31 16:29:15 devbox kernel: pid 98457 (PreBFCGL.opteron.TE), uid 1110: exited on signal 6 (core dumped) Jul 31 16:29:26 devbox kernel: pid 98494 (PreBFCGL.opteron.TE), uid 1110: exited on signal 6 (core dumped) Jul 31 16:29:36 devbox kernel: pid 98531 (PreBFCGL.opteron.TE), uid 1110: exited on signal 6 (core dumped) Aug 1 06:31:17 devbox kernel: pid 26641 (memcheck-amd64-free), uid 1110: exited on signal 6 Aug 1 06:31:17 devbox kernel: pid 26640 (time), uid 1110: exited on signal 6 Aug 1 06:42:45 devbox kernel: pid 28681 (PreBFCGL.opteron.TE), uid 1110: exited on signal 6 (core dumped) Aug 1 06:42:58 devbox kernel: pid 28718 (PreBFCGL.opteron.TE), uid 1110: exited on signal 6 (core dumped) Aug 1 06:43:09 devbox kernel: pid 28755 (PreBFCGL.opteron.TE), uid 1110: exited on signal 6 (core dumped) Aug 1 23:09:59 devbox smartd[835]: Device: /dev/ada5, 8 Currently unreadable (pending) sectors Aug 1 23:39:59 devbox smartd[835]: Device: /dev/ada5, 8 Currently unreadable (pending) sectors Aug 2 00:09:59 devbox smartd[835]: Device: /dev/ada5, 8 Currently unreadable (pending) sectors Aug 2 00:39:59 devbox smartd[835]: Device: /dev/ada5, 8 Currently unreadable (pending) sectors Aug 2 01:09:59 devbox smartd[835]: Device: /dev/ada5, 8 Currently unreadable (pending) sectors Aug 2 01:39:58 devbox smartd[835]: Device: /dev/ada5, 8 Currently unreadable (pending) sectors Aug 2 02:09:59 devbox smartd[835]: Device: /dev/ada5, 8 Currently unreadable (pending) sectors Aug 2 02:39:59 devbox smartd[835]: Device: /dev/ada5, 8 Currently unreadable (pending) sectors Aug 2 03:09:59 devbox smartd[835]: Device: /dev/ada5, 8 Currently unreadable (pending) sectors Aug 2 03:39:58 devbox smartd[835]: Device: /dev/ada5, 8 Currently unreadable (pending) sectors Aug 2 05:11:06 devbox kernel: pid 57518 (memcheck-amd64-free), uid 1110: exited on signal 6 Aug 2 05:11:06 devbox kernel: pid 57517 (time), uid 1110: exited on signal 6 Aug 2 05:21:55 devbox kernel: pid 59557 (PreBFCGL.opteron.TE), uid 1110: exited on signal 6 (core dumped) Aug 2 05:22:07 devbox kernel: pid 59594 (PreBFCGL.opteron.TE), uid 1110: exited on signal 6 (core dumped) Aug 2 05:22:16 devbox kernel: pid 59642 (PreBFCGL.opteron.TE), uid 1110: exited on signal 6 (core dumped) hwclock: Command not found. Tue Aug 2 22:28:28 MCDT 2016 You have new mail. [root@devbox, /etc, 10:28:28pm] 361 % uname -a FreeBSD devbox 9.3-RELEASE-p33 FreeBSD 9.3-RELEASE-p33 #0: Wed Jan 13 17:55:39 UTC 2016 root@amd64-builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 [root@devbox, /etc, 10:28:53pm] 362 % I am asking about the smartd messages from overnight Aug 1-2. The rest gives a bit of context about the duty cycle of the machine, which is pretty light except for rebuild code nightly & run a suite of scripted tests, some of which obviously don't complete successfully :-). The HDD's were brand new 2.5" SATA3 7200 RPM HGST's, which I have had good luck with in other builds (I have about 25 in service, all purchased new from NewEgg for each build). Case is well ventilated, drives are cool, etc. From a shell script to nicely format smartctl output: [root@devbox, /etc, 10:39:28pm] 364 % hddtemp /dev/ada[0-7] SMART supported, SMART enabled drive /dev/ada0: HGST HTS721010A9E630, S/N: JR10046P1EEJZN, Temp. 27 degC, min/max, cycle: 17/36, lifetime: 17/36, lifetime avg. 25 degC drive /dev/ada1: HGST HTS721010A9E630, S/N: JR10046P1E5ZWN, Temp. 27 degC, min/max, cycle: 17/37, lifetime: 17/37, lifetime avg. 25 degC drive /dev/ada2: HGST HTS721010A9E630, S/N: JR10046P1EKG0N, Temp. 27 degC, min/max, cycle: 16/36, lifetime: 16/36, lifetime avg. 24 degC drive /dev/ada3: HGST HTS721010A9E630, S/N: JR10046P1EK72N, Temp. 27 degC, min/max, cycle: 17/37, lifetime: 17/37, lifetime avg. 25 degC drive /dev/ada4: HGST HTS721010A9E630, S/N: JR10046P1E649N, Temp. 25 degC, min/max, cycle: 15/32, lifetime: 15/33, lifetime avg. 23 degC drive /dev/ada5: HGST HTS721010A9E630, S/N: JR10046P1E69HN, Temp. 25 degC, min/max, cycle: 14/31, lifetime: 14/31, lifetime avg. 22 degC drive /dev/ada6: HGST HTS721010A9E630, S/N: JR10046P1EK92N, Temp. 25 degC, min/max, cycle: 14/31, lifetime: 14/32, lifetime avg. 22 degC drive /dev/ada7: HGST HTS721010A9E630, S/N: JR10046P1E6A4N, Temp. 25 degC, min/max, cycle: 14/32, lifetime: 14/32, lifetime avg. 23 degC [root@devbox, /etc, 10:39:43pm] 365 % My question is: Are these messages benign, or am I in the market for more hardware ? *ANY* more questions, please ask. TIA & have a good one. -- William A. Mahaffey III ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war ever devised by man." -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Aug 3 04:18:53 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4FB1BAB8C6 for ; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 04:18:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jon@radel.com) Received: from radel.com (fly.radel.com [70.184.242.170]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.radel.com", Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 56D2C163C for ; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 04:18:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jon@radel.com) X-CGP-ClamAV-Result: CLEAN X-VirusScanner: Niversoft's CGPClamav Helper v1.18.7 (ClamAV engine v0.98.7) Received: from [2001:470:880a:4389:15ed:26:68d2:cb24] (account jon@radel.com HELO gravenstein.local) by radel.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.1.10 _community_) with ESMTPSA id 1130630; Wed, 03 Aug 2016 04:18:49 +0000 Subject: Re: Ominous smartd messages .... To: "William A. Mahaffey III" , FreeBSD Questions !!!! References: From: Jon Radel Message-ID: <117bb75c-aa6a-d562-c971-d0bab742f5ad@radel.com> Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2016 00:18:49 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha-256; boundary="------------ms050009000700050806030602" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2016 04:18:53 -0000 This is a cryptographically signed message in MIME format. --------------ms050009000700050806030602 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 8/2/16 11:41 PM, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: > It has 8 1 TB HDD's in a ZFS unmirrored pool.=20 Do I understand this to mean you have 8 TB with no redundancy? Pretty brutal if your data starts rotting away. :-( > Aug 1 23:09:59 devbox smartd[835]: Device: /dev/ada5, 8 Currently > unreadable (pending) sectors >=20 > My question is: Are these messages benign, or am I in the market for > more hardware ? *ANY* more questions, please ask. TIA & have a good one= =2E >=20 Somewhere between, YMMV, depends on your luck and the phase of the moon. That's useless, so I'll expand: I've read reasonable sounding commentary from people running very, very large collections of hard drives that there is a high enough correlation between this error and the drive going to heck sooner rather than later that they take this as a sign to replace. [Can't find reference right no= w.] I've read reasonable sounding commentary that by writing to the bad sector(s) you can force the HD to reallocate the sectors (assuming remaining capacity to do that) and then use ZFS redundancy and a good scrub to recover the data you trashed with dd (might not apply to you). Then there's a good chance that all will be well indefinitely. See https://dekoder.wordpress.com/2014/10/08/fixing-freenas-currently-unreada= ble-pending-sectors-error/ for an example of this school of thought. Actually, given that the messages stopped again, I suspect reallocation already happened, but a smartd test should tell you for certain. (You didn't have a scrub running between 8/2 03:39 and 04:09 by any chance?) Personally, so long as only one drive in my pool is doing this I tend to replace but not rush. I'd rush more if the sector count started creeping up, up, up. --=20 --Jon Radel jon@radel.com --------------ms050009000700050806030602 Content-Type: application/pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s" Content-Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExDzANBglghkgBZQMEAgEFADCABgkqhkiG9w0BBwEAAKCC Cq8wggSvMIIDl6ADAgECAhEA4CPLFRKDU4mtYW56VGdrITANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQsFADBvMQsw CQYDVQQGEwJTRTEUMBIGA1UEChMLQWRkVHJ1c3QgQUIxJjAkBgNVBAsTHUFkZFRydXN0IEV4 dGVybmFsIFRUUCBOZXR3b3JrMSIwIAYDVQQDExlBZGRUcnVzdCBFeHRlcm5hbCBDQSBSb290 MB4XDTE0MTIyMjAwMDAwMFoXDTIwMDUzMDEwNDgzOFowgZsxCzAJBgNVBAYTAkdCMRswGQYD VQQIExJHcmVhdGVyIE1hbmNoZXN0ZXIxEDAOBgNVBAcTB1NhbGZvcmQxGjAYBgNVBAoTEUNP TU9ETyBDQSBMaW1pdGVkMUEwPwYDVQQDEzhDT01PRE8gU0hBLTI1NiBDbGllbnQgQXV0aGVu dGljYXRpb24gYW5kIFNlY3VyZSBFbWFpbCBDQTCCASIwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADggEPADCC AQoCggEBAImxDdp6UxlOcFIdvFamBia3uEngludRq/HwWhNJFaO0jBtgvHpRQqd5jKQi3xdh TpHVdiMKFNNKAn+2HQmAbqUEPdm6uxb+oYepLkNSQxZ8rzJQyKZPWukI2M+TJZx7iOgwZOak +FaA/SokFDMXmaxE5WmLo0YGS8Iz1OlAnwawsayTQLm1CJM6nCpToxDbPSBhPFUDjtlOdiUC ISn6o3xxdk/u4V+B6ftUgNvDezVSt4TeIj0sMC0xf1m9UjewM2ktQ+v61qXxl3dnUYzZ7ifr vKUHOHaMpKk4/9+M9QOsSb7K93OZOg8yq5yVOhM9DkY6V3RhUL7GQD/L5OKfoiECAwEAAaOC ARcwggETMB8GA1UdIwQYMBaAFK29mHo0tCb3+sQmVO8DveAky1QaMB0GA1UdDgQWBBSSYWuC 4aKgqk/sZ/HCo/e0gADB7DAOBgNVHQ8BAf8EBAMCAYYwEgYDVR0TAQH/BAgwBgEB/wIBADAd BgNVHSUEFjAUBggrBgEFBQcDAgYIKwYBBQUHAwQwEQYDVR0gBAowCDAGBgRVHSAAMEQGA1Ud HwQ9MDswOaA3oDWGM2h0dHA6Ly9jcmwudXNlcnRydXN0LmNvbS9BZGRUcnVzdEV4dGVybmFs Q0FSb290LmNybDA1BggrBgEFBQcBAQQpMCcwJQYIKwYBBQUHMAGGGWh0dHA6Ly9vY3NwLnVz ZXJ0cnVzdC5jb20wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQELBQADggEBABsqbqxVwTqriMXY7c1V86prYSvACRAj mQ/FZmpvsfW0tXdeDwJhAN99Bf4Ss6SAgAD8+x1banICCkG8BbrBWNUmwurVTYT7/oKYz1gb 4yJjnFL4uwU2q31Ypd6rO2Pl2tVz7+zg+3vio//wQiOcyraNTT7kSxgDsqgt1Ni7QkuQaYUQ 26Y3NOh74AEQpZzKOsefT4g0bopl0BqKu6ncyso20fT8wmQpNa/WsadxEdIDQ7GPPprsnjJT 9HaSyoY0B7ksyuYcStiZDcGG4pCS+1pCaiMhEOllx/XVu37qjIUgAmLq0ToHLFnFmTPyOInl tukWeh95FPZKEBom+nyK+5swggX4MIIE4KADAgECAhBzVOU8fWu0zQ1gaQ38zgEbMA0GCSqG SIb3DQEBCwUAMIGbMQswCQYDVQQGEwJHQjEbMBkGA1UECBMSR3JlYXRlciBNYW5jaGVzdGVy MRAwDgYDVQQHEwdTYWxmb3JkMRowGAYDVQQKExFDT01PRE8gQ0EgTGltaXRlZDFBMD8GA1UE AxM4Q09NT0RPIFNIQS0yNTYgQ2xpZW50IEF1dGhlbnRpY2F0aW9uIGFuZCBTZWN1cmUgRW1h aWwgQ0EwHhcNMTUwMzMwMDAwMDAwWhcNMTgwMzI5MjM1OTU5WjCB+jELMAkGA1UEBhMCVVMx DjAMBgNVBBETBTIyMTUwMQswCQYDVQQIEwJWQTEUMBIGA1UEBxMLU3ByaW5nZmllbGQxGjAY BgNVBAkTETY5MTcgUmlkZ2V3YXkgRHIuMRUwEwYDVQQKEwxKb24gVC4gUmFkZWwxMjAwBgNV BAsTKUlzc3VlZCB0aHJvdWdoIEpvbiBULiBSYWRlbCBFLVBLSSBNYW5hZ2VyMR8wHQYDVQQL ExZDb3Jwb3JhdGUgU2VjdXJlIEVtYWlsMRIwEAYDVQQDEwlKb24gUmFkZWwxHDAaBgkqhkiG 9w0BCQEWDWpvbkByYWRlbC5jb20wggEiMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4IBDwAwggEKAoIBAQDe 1Rth9hbQqaODn++C5dVAQH9nM2VH3oPazZufOwmIG2SXI/v3PuemcQQ3JkhmpQ06gYszyXbk TCLsqvEfalYj81jdt/K5lT4aVdj0LfJIWyTcU95V2rsCuHsSvn/PnIcsEtXg53rCtqS4EOtJ 9u3rY2hP8YCiyz1yY3mn4nKJs93MHG4AkXYuVpzfaIADETcVrA+razvXEfnDJXXDZZ9ZuuV1 06yIovOvhYWSlaVu8nrSHJjXFZI2IXwgIeVBoMih3yu6LLj14I/YdZ0rIA8K+UNB+NW6Ri3u wHXBbr4jh3ZqkrqIVUrf1VeybhdrJcdqXdMNHjKDSlCoaxYRbLy1AgMBAAGjggHVMIIB0TAf BgNVHSMEGDAWgBSSYWuC4aKgqk/sZ/HCo/e0gADB7DAdBgNVHQ4EFgQUz9YB10WEfBNHskRw o/0vh8qaQuwwDgYDVR0PAQH/BAQDAgWgMAwGA1UdEwEB/wQCMAAwHQYDVR0lBBYwFAYIKwYB BQUHAwQGCCsGAQUFBwMCMEYGA1UdIAQ/MD0wOwYMKwYBBAGyMQECAQMFMCswKQYIKwYBBQUH AgEWHWh0dHBzOi8vc2VjdXJlLmNvbW9kby5uZXQvQ1BTMF0GA1UdHwRWMFQwUqBQoE6GTGh0 dHA6Ly9jcmwuY29tb2RvY2EuY29tL0NPTU9ET1NIQTI1NkNsaWVudEF1dGhlbnRpY2F0aW9u YW5kU2VjdXJlRW1haWxDQS5jcmwwgZAGCCsGAQUFBwEBBIGDMIGAMFgGCCsGAQUFBzAChkxo dHRwOi8vY3J0LmNvbW9kb2NhLmNvbS9DT01PRE9TSEEyNTZDbGllbnRBdXRoZW50aWNhdGlv bmFuZFNlY3VyZUVtYWlsQ0EuY3J0MCQGCCsGAQUFBzABhhhodHRwOi8vb2NzcC5jb21vZG9j YS5jb20wGAYDVR0RBBEwD4ENam9uQHJhZGVsLmNvbTANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQsFAAOCAQEAS1Pe +gBgP+SQ/a5I5e7zX0Rg0DhH378LHlZixJgS6LfCPL2edKMUQi3Th9GXfLjdeyeWuMWoz925 ZzBHcPwkBeH+iM/AEhu0Dhi0kop/p66g9tEPJUZ/KDsqxddNDrD0Typn3/33pHTjJEDqydzA gwB0Nn8blpMbqSwT+j8wuPakfLsj1cSDzXrTLLsmIQB7auAyaYXdWyW8Yqw336rLUCvjOUfn qOOyjVsieTw/0PLoOHJaGyez+VtV4eyi6p1SNiX32A+fvxBMzKQLCokE43cXItc9Okzq//f2 fuvGp17r8mpm4OjjM5E2kwsg9bBPUBMR4/sxosKVLn0o9rxlozGCBEEwggQ9AgEBMIGwMIGb MQswCQYDVQQGEwJHQjEbMBkGA1UECBMSR3JlYXRlciBNYW5jaGVzdGVyMRAwDgYDVQQHEwdT YWxmb3JkMRowGAYDVQQKExFDT01PRE8gQ0EgTGltaXRlZDFBMD8GA1UEAxM4Q09NT0RPIFNI QS0yNTYgQ2xpZW50IEF1dGhlbnRpY2F0aW9uIGFuZCBTZWN1cmUgRW1haWwgQ0ECEHNU5Tx9 a7TNDWBpDfzOARswDQYJYIZIAWUDBAIBBQCgggJhMBgGCSqGSIb3DQEJAzELBgkqhkiG9w0B BwEwHAYJKoZIhvcNAQkFMQ8XDTE2MDgwMzA0MTg0OVowLwYJKoZIhvcNAQkEMSIEIPaspHKD Zb1Y2rhMRsj+c4JMJfk9XeA6MEP26cJDtOntMGwGCSqGSIb3DQEJDzFfMF0wCwYJYIZIAWUD BAEqMAsGCWCGSAFlAwQBAjAKBggqhkiG9w0DBzAOBggqhkiG9w0DAgICAIAwDQYIKoZIhvcN AwICAUAwBwYFKw4DAgcwDQYIKoZIhvcNAwICASgwgcEGCSsGAQQBgjcQBDGBszCBsDCBmzEL MAkGA1UEBhMCR0IxGzAZBgNVBAgTEkdyZWF0ZXIgTWFuY2hlc3RlcjEQMA4GA1UEBxMHU2Fs Zm9yZDEaMBgGA1UEChMRQ09NT0RPIENBIExpbWl0ZWQxQTA/BgNVBAMTOENPTU9ETyBTSEEt MjU2IENsaWVudCBBdXRoZW50aWNhdGlvbiBhbmQgU2VjdXJlIEVtYWlsIENBAhBzVOU8fWu0 zQ1gaQ38zgEbMIHDBgsqhkiG9w0BCRACCzGBs6CBsDCBmzELMAkGA1UEBhMCR0IxGzAZBgNV BAgTEkdyZWF0ZXIgTWFuY2hlc3RlcjEQMA4GA1UEBxMHU2FsZm9yZDEaMBgGA1UEChMRQ09N T0RPIENBIExpbWl0ZWQxQTA/BgNVBAMTOENPTU9ETyBTSEEtMjU2IENsaWVudCBBdXRoZW50 aWNhdGlvbiBhbmQgU2VjdXJlIEVtYWlsIENBAhBzVOU8fWu0zQ1gaQ38zgEbMA0GCSqGSIb3 DQEBAQUABIIBANl6tQ6BVVhszEfQFLFsh9HNbgBstNIiopOso6ZWqGOvbLwN7a/NS7WSx3cn MKW03DfgJmBGyUBNLNxqwPuZgKDwC8myDOvD7m9z7QsBuYQzvhCBFkLjE1W5eZUcGC8RA0xx vmFsOePizSXvoeUJRiXQQ3Am04emfvmjkjl5qMFNYdOjC0iiJC5wr31LPnzENcgdSFYVPeYh OFb1zY2OZ2DEm+WrW6C+tpUMaKXpjwIKzxF26zsPfhS5tYvXZHetTPNho25twECkH/Ucj/CF qimCqt3civNLkzE/EWDSjzgpsah2Tbyz7ii1xCaoXFDW4dpikKkzwo5JIMcVR4QAiAAAAAAA AAA= --------------ms050009000700050806030602-- From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Aug 3 05:59:25 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62F09BADA1B for ; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 05:59:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dpchrist@holgerdanske.com) Received: from holgerdanske.com (holgerdanske.com [184.105.128.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.he.net", Issuer "GeoTrust SSL CA - G4" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 55958182F for ; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 05:59:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dpchrist@holgerdanske.com) Received: from ::ffff:99.100.19.101 ([99.100.19.101]) by holgerdanske.com for ; Tue, 2 Aug 2016 20:59:19 -0700 Subject: Re: Ominous smartd messages .... To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: From: David Christensen X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110 Message-ID: <9ea1dbaf-6151-edc8-9e2a-430abe757472@holgerdanske.com> Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 20:59:19 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2016 05:59:25 -0000 On 08/02/2016 08:41 PM, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: > ... 8 1 TB HDD's in a ZFS unmirrored pool. ... > Aug 1 23:09:59 devbox smartd[835]: Device: /dev/ada5, 8 Currently > unreadable (pending) sectors > Aug 1 23:39:59 devbox smartd[835]: Device: /dev/ada5, 8 Currently > unreadable (pending) sectors > Aug 2 00:09:59 devbox smartd[835]: Device: /dev/ada5, 8 Currently > unreadable (pending) sectors > Aug 2 00:39:59 devbox smartd[835]: Device: /dev/ada5, 8 Currently > unreadable (pending) sectors > Aug 2 01:09:59 devbox smartd[835]: Device: /dev/ada5, 8 Currently > unreadable (pending) sectors > Aug 2 01:39:58 devbox smartd[835]: Device: /dev/ada5, 8 Currently > unreadable (pending) sectors > Aug 2 02:09:59 devbox smartd[835]: Device: /dev/ada5, 8 Currently > unreadable (pending) sectors > Aug 2 02:39:59 devbox smartd[835]: Device: /dev/ada5, 8 Currently > unreadable (pending) sectors > Aug 2 03:09:59 devbox smartd[835]: Device: /dev/ada5, 8 Currently > unreadable (pending) sectors > Aug 2 03:39:58 devbox smartd[835]: Device: /dev/ada5, 8 Currently > unreadable (pending) sectors > ... The > HDD's were brand new 2.5" SATA3 7200 RPM HGST's, which I have had good > luck with in other builds (I have about 25 in service, all purchased new > from NewEgg for each build). Case is well ventilated, drives are cool, > etc. ... > My question is: Are these messages benign, or am I in the market for > more hardware ? *ANY* more questions, please ask. TIA & have a good one. HBA's can fail. Cables can fail; usually, it's the connection/ connector. Re-seating cables can fix problems. Connections should feel solid. If not, install a new cable and recycle the old one. I assume there is some utility on BSD to read and pretty-print the smartd information (?). I would download the HGST Windows Drive Fitness Test (WinDFT) and use it to test all the drives. Ideally, by removing your BSD system drive, installing a Windows system drive, installing WinDFT, and running WinDFT before, during, and after you mess with the hardware. David From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Aug 3 09:06:43 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 102BDBADBB5 for ; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 09:06:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from mail-wm0-x236.google.com (mail-wm0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A0391128F for ; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 09:06:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: by mail-wm0-x236.google.com with SMTP id q128so439662138wma.1 for ; Wed, 03 Aug 2016 02:06:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bris-ac-uk.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:message-id:to:subject:cc:reply-to:in-reply-to; bh=uozrDKGQC8wUUZEwAA07jczNc33VwJzqI74gSsC8Yoo=; b=it3IPzTmAQJ42oxVQW0pSrnsaGHqmVOjwQvy6EQiQn9LFkQ3Ml+QCg7PULu2Zvf7lF dmbLSeWIAr23fjPp3fOq2Di14tIsopTxsVvwY4sSWu51cWPh52Q2HwsvDKujP+D+vdZZ RvFRdohhU9gKC9eW420ZRInSRbQ/ESXDRobb20ot7UEwoMabDqDjNUdx69U1NbUphmE9 IxUkFdm6i85Ghy64x2FKgR/Foq/ylINwvS0CYNGhahC496rQ5Y0YaofbiwZkHSO3vIA7 Dh8fhaARVE5cwHrhvTlIU+oC23s0W8pIT/aTdTll2bYqeQ/Y2AUs1Q73JESQi4IrOVwi VXSg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:message-id:to:subject:cc:reply-to :in-reply-to; bh=uozrDKGQC8wUUZEwAA07jczNc33VwJzqI74gSsC8Yoo=; b=DabFEZIdqY5Gf+NfkZm2tW5e6MHUs/AKWdvF/7T+wSJ1djKax8K/bAnxpI8VkGADIT 6j/5agSZptBWmBAYg9wP9so9KcqnRSYg9cXQXHYgOpBw+z4uispduk6w7LaZRs6o3KMk u/HgHHhKOvvu4zRjffF3Py6W6n7ti/mALvidieTqwLHjrUhQhpSj+TA4rE5aaJWww696 MWYa474cxuITrGrYQtU03Kaa2XVuW7f80hkUrG1fACoJ7wPP6p7ELgxa/+qyLjFhTszC miyYjBjuiFPXocov6NDwFHJDqdDcku6qTVxll4aU3tvYhj8F80u9Cw2X/eOpwPpH7TUX yQQQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AEkooutHnRhCb2xR6zZWIEkL4SmmxOi/gnaS7lZGm/JRsEfW1G0lShK8Ze22U7agxa1gt/U3 X-Received: by 10.28.104.137 with SMTP id d131mr23477082wmc.7.1470215200411; Wed, 03 Aug 2016 02:06:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk (mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk. [137.222.170.4]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id kq2sm6632992wjc.41.2016.08.03.02.06.39 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 03 Aug 2016 02:06:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u7396cg2081664; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 10:06:38 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mexas@mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id u7396cOa081663; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 10:06:38 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mexas) Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2016 10:06:38 +0100 (BST) From: Anton Shterenlikht Message-Id: <201608030906.u7396cOa081663@mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk> To: mexas@bris.ac.uk, woodsb02@gmail.com Subject: Re: wireless hints: AP, username, password - does not work Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Reply-To: mexas@bris.ac.uk In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2016 09:06:43 -0000 >From woodsb02@gmail.com Wed Aug 3 00:48:15 2016 > >ifconfig_wlan0="ssid *your_ssid_here* DHCP" Thank you, that did it. My bad, I should've read the manual: Sec. 30.3.4.1.2.1. Selecting an Access Point. >Once you are connected and have an IP address, open your browser and >navigate to any webpage which DOESNT USE HTTPS. I commonly use >www.distrowatch.com, but any others you know which don't use https will Thanks Anton From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Aug 3 10:13:10 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BA55BABD7A for ; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 10:13:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alister@christman.co.uk) Received: from avasout06.plus.net (avasout06.plus.net [212.159.14.18]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "Bizanga Labs SMTP Client Certificate", Issuer "Bizanga Labs CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E9E71704 for ; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 10:13:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alister@christman.co.uk) Received: from home.christman.co.uk ([84.92.42.76]) by avasout06 with smtp id Sa9p1t0041ebwpQ01a9roa; Wed, 03 Aug 2016 11:09:54 +0100 X-CM-Score: 0.00 X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.2 cv=HdVWdWM8 c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=3ti3oP3B5fEi2yEVSnNneg==:117 a=3ti3oP3B5fEi2yEVSnNneg==:17 a=FKkrIqjQGGEA:10 a=75C8kDiBX1gA:10 a=7z1cN_iqozsA:10 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=2n3xTrYjnEOrexGHVUwA:9 a=wpvI5TNCcjIA:10 a=33Ln3BzpdlcA:10 a=82-kyh_VXv8A:10 a=PiPDwP91I9R_yeUZPFMA:9 a=eNtu2kz399jay3QV:21 a=_W_S_7VecoQA:10 a=IjZwj45LgO3ly-622nXo:22 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by home.christman.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 344DE3220A0 for ; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 12:25:04 +0100 (BST) Received: from home.christman.co.uk ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (home.christman.co.uk [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id rAoxqK-J2lRq for ; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 12:24:48 +0100 (BST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by home.christman.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0E8C3220B1 for ; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 12:24:42 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at christman.co.uk Received: from home.christman.co.uk ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (home.christman.co.uk [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id eSOrlZmPbmsE for ; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 12:24:36 +0100 (BST) Received: from home.christman.co.uk (home.christman.co.uk [192.168.127.20]) by home.christman.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D2A03220A0 for ; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 12:24:35 +0100 (BST) Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2016 12:24:32 +0100 (BST) From: Alister Christman To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <35076919.4276.1470223471954.JavaMail.zimbra@christman.co.uk> Subject: Samba MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [192.168.127.106] X-Mailer: Zimbra 8.6.0_GA_1169 (ZimbraWebClient - GC51 (Win)/8.6.0_GA_1169) Thread-Topic: Samba Thread-Index: +4pH2Wl7bsrZ6VzHYMTyJVP+otREOg== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2016 10:13:10 -0000 Hi Just been following https://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/network-samba.html and install samba via pkg install But once it has been installed. i have to add this samba_server_enable="yes" to /etc/rc.conf and start it via "service samba_server start" which verys from the documentation. I dont know if this is correct and the documentation needs to be update? Thanks for your great work Al From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Aug 3 10:29:13 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FE2BBAD1DE for ; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 10:29:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alnis.m@mail.com) Received: from mout.gmx.com (mout.gmx.com [74.208.4.200]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F61E1ED2 for ; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 10:29:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alnis.m@mail.com) Received: from [192.168.0.192] ([78.84.255.253]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmxus001) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M5cZ4-1bJiDh2ZYW-00xeHR for ; Wed, 03 Aug 2016 12:24:02 +0200 Subject: Re: Samba To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <35076919.4276.1470223471954.JavaMail.zimbra@christman.co.uk> From: Alnis Morics Message-ID: <1bb2f19f-d8d8-3f13-f148-19c75bdd60e9@mail.com> Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2016 13:23:58 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/45.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <35076919.4276.1470223471954.JavaMail.zimbra@christman.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:6PcnMwLNTZf/3sZiPrc+nMns+bp6yZOqzw3PFGnIoUj9C3T1W1+ 01yZxpYcwe8WLTtSrV/aKSslCz/ogz0HKYmbx04mqhfC3T6dl/2PYHPamlsJ7Q8719V24c8 9hHZaYt5v3iBu3PIqzJ17vLAeAtNmjkpZWkIfACjzm1ZWEApw39ksp6OaAJDcnfGwnRmNx1 oHttpt7H8G2zUsuxNldPw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:+BpNW+DLA3M=:wTxrHY5BEsgGo+kQEs3Qxi BAfMuhg0Ayt3Ats5RSihzBN3eDNcNwbc6msDwMhvTwYxkN0Vn2I5aDJGzski3/1ns3AxgghZE uCkKxaz+uNEfu2D6DpqhZgyvhFQvKxk1rPgSXPqlGsr/xnfGNUhFhAFcUNmVpSivZF05qrA+i vDWKdF3NJSd41EPZDMa+KQqzB8uib1/QdeXnlrMx9SyTOSDSkjE8cSba3oWPOULF8QwGplYL9 dbKe5VEsYEahoukp8MO/RQVvsAKAempRpln+6z8m28SUQCZkI2Jaf09TwFhC5u8jF1dWwKk/F RPLx7xJfgdlAOoBXOOmZTpvZc7KhoUNI3eAFpD3d4eVf+u+el5eORLcXD+fcEZSuCUpKIiAQM OUPGgGwqSVrtZX2A1mob+KsDEmyRD2HJHt4NcWH2p+cEB6lstU6rqiWX6y2qgdUOJ03If/A44 a8fIGg50/Mgle/tgUY6Wb3274pWnto8QPw3Gfd4sMGs/nRwIPdylJijccK9mTaxOVjAPHu44s Q3hWmsnaHG4QPHUAiN/2FppOGfdN/oUEDalBpet6dQNC2Z0A/9EHNDlqRwIUC0C9fIyYfg9g3 MwMVL+BX1ebqEAjVzswe2Dd3Li8Gx790dTnhLnYqTDudo7367wknvYuoz9+I13YSPj7kdVemI rDXOSA2nxeKrRzfjDOqpdj2s3TPVRjp32dCwHG7ZnZ2nA43Q9wAEyxu8bMqA823RFJfpMvrzu djQlHmgIETnWeNwta3j4sOezmXo+X25PLEJ8KjvK4dZX1MoCwWGaW6Pa3UFUaJZNYb14toKq7 oTzj+z1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2016 10:29:13 -0000 On 08/03/2016 02:24 PM, Alister Christman wrote: > Hi > > Just been following > > https://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/network-samba.html > > and install samba via pkg install > > But once it has been installed. > > i have to add this > > samba_server_enable="yes" to /etc/rc.conf > > and > > start it via "service samba_server start" > > which verys from the documentation. > > I dont know if this is correct and the documentation needs to be update? > > Thanks for your great work > > Al > This how the startup script is now called (/usr/local/etc/rc.d/samba_server), and it works as you are saying. Didn't notice that the Handbook says otherwise. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Aug 3 10:32:58 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9457DBAD3F6 for ; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 10:32:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alnis.m@mail.com) Received: from mout.gmx.com (mout.gmx.com [74.208.4.200]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 53923139A for ; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 10:32:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alnis.m@mail.com) Received: from [192.168.0.192] ([78.84.255.253]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmxus002) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M9rqw-1bOKsm2eIy-00B5XU for ; Wed, 03 Aug 2016 12:27:57 +0200 Subject: Re: Samba To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <35076919.4276.1470223471954.JavaMail.zimbra@christman.co.uk> From: Alnis Morics Message-ID: Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2016 13:27:53 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/45.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <35076919.4276.1470223471954.JavaMail.zimbra@christman.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:zfZTyRE64NIa3Cc2aU9zaUiyIspWqHDuq019wYdV6LYh4qak1LN 3zxlAmK0gCNFf1wVMqASMDv3W9AbRV7dmvKJGBV+r90AEmgQ61B0kEsKwzkFOa55d1BfsAQ HgmeQz7nO0MHvjOX0LGJ29I7E698N525mvre8huMdoAP7YDOQVLoLTuicLuRgS9Akc9rNX/ 4KAHeMvPlaMkSJJqiA8gg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:0idP5CgDpP0=:Du1gNZgJPKJDwrX+Po2K5E +wHnsIIV/hxdKeyYimnE4VjpHukvRQ9iXcK6jHbk/iXvtwHIEeq592bPMxDOr7Z2a6JF/rfI0 2h21UAVmCelBCKH0vWi0BsYsLRQYy2cFmyNx6gScu7oNmTr/5bJ0r53HstbcO79SbcXl+DA// CRvcj7hgtZMeLWgupRD4SD53k+A8xqOZY/nLHKFoKFZTDoE1TBCOLjxHfyxlInLLxGr+jralZ Eq/sEdOTL24iicjkU9g7et2G6vDTpyJC0D/A7GYw8f3+FlVnyysJI24s8YLJQC7h/8Duf1C7w 3NPMPV++Sw7Lw/iPlFrMjhD7XsPOKVSHBGPPYPUR8ML74bRaZUQRG2j08jGWTInvZzGUGdgkW b8Iz+uPVdeJtJO+XjY/KxrGPcEhiskQNJJnlvR7u9ZTd7VPE72AITg/pqIB80wojpXadRLDqZ VsPhRNYD/+N+jYvpKNt/rnHB5AQrKybEXYQBf6GZwe6TNxR6gBA030LHhb5YCuZkNgqGtsZ5+ 6HlP+ofC7ZM6is7aR6WzhwT8d93qsj0cRnkhyC4sBFEZPakFXJvqVMnbya9GwIwfX8IJjcKgK 7m44TM+NJ8+CCAPsF+3JvNgL7Rf3eN4Ue4IWA7ZaBmydyfEZU0wq3+oqfyYgqM+927bAsX0uJ 4m1uJgswpEiXzvrz4j1/9+O+X0TyXfg4gYiGK2QO0xuRMZgkJ/2orhHN9VUoOQsyY6Um17eFm 2SZMOJ9L8JToHbuRnKMeqQdq96aq3JnUs94GoLcsgzNtQhZ8u0pRnhKVe8YmS2i2cnN7dQrFC Aj54ZbA X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2016 10:32:58 -0000 On 08/03/2016 02:24 PM, Alister Christman wrote: > Hi > > Just been following > > https://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/network-samba.html > > and install samba via pkg install > > But once it has been installed. > > i have to add this > > samba_server_enable="yes" to /etc/rc.conf > > and > > start it via "service samba_server start" > > which verys from the documentation. > > I dont know if this is correct and the documentation needs to be update? > > Thanks for your great work > > Al > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" P.S. Btw, you can find this in your local documentation /usr/local/share/doc/samba43/README.FreeBSD From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Aug 3 12:18:49 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2242BADFE9 for ; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 12:18:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.2.117.100]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk", Issuer "infracaninophile.co.uk" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C639119B for ; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 12:18:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from ox-dell39.ox.adestra.com (unknown [85.199.232.226]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BC64F8373 for ; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 12:18:44 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk; dmarc=none header.from=FreeBSD.org Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/BC64F8373; dkim=none; dkim-atps=neutral Subject: Re: Ominous smartd messages .... To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: From: Matthew Seaman Message-ID: <020caa94-b329-d5a6-5bd4-bfcc575c039f@freebsd.org> Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2016 13:18:37 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ggDR6O4p3VNogUimexOpREOdO0AVNXkOL" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RDNS_NONE, SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2016 12:18:49 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --ggDR6O4p3VNogUimexOpREOdO0AVNXkOL Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="DuLCVLQ9LMtCBPAPSHJi0UkxhRKIjeiqw" From: Matthew Seaman To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <020caa94-b329-d5a6-5bd4-bfcc575c039f@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Ominous smartd messages .... References: In-Reply-To: --DuLCVLQ9LMtCBPAPSHJi0UkxhRKIjeiqw Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 08/03/16 04:41, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: > My question is: Are these messages benign, or am I in the market for > more hardware ? *ANY* more questions, please ask. TIA & have a good one= =2E It doesn't look particularly good. Do you run the smartd selftests at all? Worth giving that a go -- # smartctl -t long /dev/ada5 This can be done while the disk is in use without upsetting anything. It will scan the disk for unreadable areas. The disk does have a number of spare sectors it can use instead of any broken ones, but it generally needs to see a failed write to the affected area to trigger the substitution mechanism. Once you run out of substitute sectors, the disk is basically toast and should be replaced. With modern drives, seeing that mechanism in use at all typically means the drive is on the downward spiral and you should plan on replacing it PDQ. Cheers, Matthew --DuLCVLQ9LMtCBPAPSHJi0UkxhRKIjeiqw-- --ggDR6O4p3VNogUimexOpREOdO0AVNXkOL Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJXoeEeAAoJEABRPxDgqeTnM/kP/133GBVR2hBKyxWeR1lhU45e vyUE86kvX3ETwgSIB0nW7su2cbt8kBPKl35Qa2LsC8SYwouJaXqICzKpV9i4tkI5 tTfl4LSY+ZJuEHKWGNz085Ti0XcRc9D4vh0SorpO9DCRl1xseJVcjwAzjO6J4SP5 YS2YhAvVHrKO8K3tYhmV3iuWMGT8BnXB3wJjzbg1VnEsXMBMsRnXbG3hY3admFaM /qfWydhTEMt5Q1bMYAAxhJclOB0nzOhQ3DHo+UIUFxz+T1011RRgKvp8VQhGr/wm XXMFBBhxplpcP+emrnYy5+/W81qme08Uvu40Fk7k3ghZU45OuAYJXn9XcBhmes3/ fu/UFPDWmYtobpcHQcrbCPdAmNmQqVcmOwVJvaa2S1iRFTe54vuWi/z1VBlxRd1H HBTEUqd1PegklYj7WJCi29FU71HQaWb4hXN38cVkK51wVWhaMibhpm/+tPA9D7ZG pUicpu7CqB6pNpieL/qmp9hKKSDjC4LM88lZsGc6bDlgn/sry+EeIPndlydxSm/q 252TSJH0JQThTxEJWpv2HsPQqQITKjKGUEffZTSMl5HrOBuCi6vtS/32Bh3Mj/bE ptzGwE3MJtN5enySCVXz9qlFS4tS5FRvawDT1yJk5gqMxYXGB7k7i3grk4iuBT7t 29Ovo7c13cSZOTt18ls1 =gaEu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ggDR6O4p3VNogUimexOpREOdO0AVNXkOL-- From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Aug 3 12:32:24 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7563CBAA726 for ; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 12:32:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wam@hiwaay.net) Received: from fly.hiwaay.net (fly.hiwaay.net [216.180.54.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4787C19FB for ; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 12:32:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wam@hiwaay.net) Received: from kabini1.local (dynamic-216-186-209-65.knology.net [216.186.209.65] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by fly.hiwaay.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/fly) with ESMTP id u73CWLNL019126 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 07:32:22 -0500 Subject: Re: Ominous smartd messages .... To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <020caa94-b329-d5a6-5bd4-bfcc575c039f@freebsd.org> From: "William A. Mahaffey III" Message-ID: <10b1ff8b-c738-3cee-30bb-9812f75436c1@hiwaay.net> Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2016 07:37:50 -0453.75 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <020caa94-b329-d5a6-5bd4-bfcc575c039f@freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2016 12:32:24 -0000 On 08/03/16 07:24, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 08/03/16 04:41, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: >> My question is: Are these messages benign, or am I in the market for >> more hardware ? *ANY* more questions, please ask. TIA & have a good one. > It doesn't look particularly good. Do you run the smartd selftests at > all? Worth giving that a go -- > > # smartctl -t long /dev/ada5 > > This can be done while the disk is in use without upsetting anything. > It will scan the disk for unreadable areas. The disk does have a number > of spare sectors it can use instead of any broken ones, but it generally > needs to see a failed write to the affected area to trigger the > substitution mechanism. Once you run out of substitute sectors, the > disk is basically toast and should be replaced. With modern drives, > seeing that mechanism in use at all typically means the drive is on the > downward spiral and you should plan on replacing it PDQ. > > Cheers, > > Matthew > > Thanks, I kicked that off just now, it says it will take 169 min. to complete, so we'll see. No more new messages overnight, maybe my luck is good .... -- William A. Mahaffey III ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war ever devised by man." -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Aug 3 12:43:47 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D953BAAA0C for ; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 12:43:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wam@hiwaay.net) Received: from fly.hiwaay.net (fly.hiwaay.net [216.180.54.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D0E781206 for ; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 12:43:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wam@hiwaay.net) Received: from kabini1.local (dynamic-216-186-209-65.knology.net [216.186.209.65] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by fly.hiwaay.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/fly) with ESMTP id u73Chifi026029 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 07:43:45 -0500 Subject: Re: Ominous smartd messages .... To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <9ea1dbaf-6151-edc8-9e2a-430abe757472@holgerdanske.com> From: "William A. Mahaffey III" Message-ID: Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2016 07:49:14 -0453.75 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <9ea1dbaf-6151-edc8-9e2a-430abe757472@holgerdanske.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2016 12:43:47 -0000 On 08/02/16 23:05, David Christensen wrote: > On 08/02/2016 08:41 PM, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: >> ... 8 1 TB HDD's in a ZFS unmirrored pool. ... >> Aug 1 23:09:59 devbox smartd[835]: Device: /dev/ada5, 8 Currently >> unreadable (pending) sectors >> Aug 1 23:39:59 devbox smartd[835]: Device: /dev/ada5, 8 Currently >> unreadable (pending) sectors >> Aug 2 00:09:59 devbox smartd[835]: Device: /dev/ada5, 8 Currently >> unreadable (pending) sectors >> Aug 2 00:39:59 devbox smartd[835]: Device: /dev/ada5, 8 Currently >> unreadable (pending) sectors >> Aug 2 01:09:59 devbox smartd[835]: Device: /dev/ada5, 8 Currently >> unreadable (pending) sectors >> Aug 2 01:39:58 devbox smartd[835]: Device: /dev/ada5, 8 Currently >> unreadable (pending) sectors >> Aug 2 02:09:59 devbox smartd[835]: Device: /dev/ada5, 8 Currently >> unreadable (pending) sectors >> Aug 2 02:39:59 devbox smartd[835]: Device: /dev/ada5, 8 Currently >> unreadable (pending) sectors >> Aug 2 03:09:59 devbox smartd[835]: Device: /dev/ada5, 8 Currently >> unreadable (pending) sectors >> Aug 2 03:39:58 devbox smartd[835]: Device: /dev/ada5, 8 Currently >> unreadable (pending) sectors >> ... The >> HDD's were brand new 2.5" SATA3 7200 RPM HGST's, which I have had good >> luck with in other builds (I have about 25 in service, all purchased new >> from NewEgg for each build). Case is well ventilated, drives are cool, >> etc. ... >> My question is: Are these messages benign, or am I in the market for >> more hardware ? *ANY* more questions, please ask. TIA & have a good one. > HBA's can fail. No separate HBA, 8 SATA3 slots on the mbd. Definitely hope that's *NOT* the problem :-/ .... > > Cables can fail; usually, it's the connection/ connector. Re-seating > cables can fix problems. Connections should feel solid. If not, > install a new cable and recycle the old one. > > > I assume there is some utility on BSD to read and pretty-print the > smartd information (?). No, I wrote a small script to do that .... > > I would download the HGST Windows Drive Fitness Test (WinDFT) and use it > to test all the drives. Ideally, by removing your BSD system drive, > installing a Windows system drive, installing WinDFT, and running WinDFT > before, during, and after you mess with the hardware. > > > David > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > No separate system drive, ZFS root as per wiki. That last option sounds destructive, right ? Any other options short of that ? Thanks & TIA .... -- William A. Mahaffey III ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war ever devised by man." -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Aug 3 13:12:16 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B892DBAC271; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 13:12:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dweimer@dweimer.net) Received: from webmail.dweimer.net (24-240-198-188.static.stls.mo.charter.com [24.240.198.188]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7FBFE177D; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 13:12:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dweimer@dweimer.net) Received: from webmail.dweimer.local (localhost [10.9.5.2]) by webmail.dweimer.net (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id u73CnSH8023694 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 3 Aug 2016 07:49:28 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dweimer@dweimer.net) Received: (from www@localhost) by webmail.dweimer.local (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id u73CnStj023693; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 07:49:28 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dweimer@dweimer.net) X-Authentication-Warning: webmail.dweimer.local: www set sender to dweimer@dweimer.net using -f To: Alnis Morics Subject: Re: Samba MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2016 07:49:28 -0500 From: "Dean E. Weimer" Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Organization: dweimer.net Reply-To: dweimer@dweimer.net Mail-Reply-To: dweimer@dweimer.net In-Reply-To: References: <35076919.4276.1470223471954.JavaMail.zimbra@christman.co.uk> Message-ID: <61ae1cfa9d0eaf350c51354cd9a2f6a0@dweimer.net> X-Sender: dweimer@dweimer.net User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.2.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2016 13:12:16 -0000 On 2016-08-03 5:27 am, Alnis Morics wrote: > On 08/03/2016 02:24 PM, Alister Christman wrote: >> Hi >> >> Just been following >> >> https://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/network-samba.html >> >> and install samba via pkg install >> >> But once it has been installed. >> >> i have to add this >> >> samba_server_enable="yes" to /etc/rc.conf >> >> and >> >> start it via "service samba_server start" >> >> which verys from the documentation. >> >> I dont know if this is correct and the documentation needs to be >> update? >> >> Thanks for your great work >> >> Al >> >> >> It looks like the handbook page needs updated since 4.x became the default, the 3.x versions didn't have the _server on the end of the startup script. -- Thanks, Dean E. Weimer http://www.dweimer.net/ From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Aug 3 13:37:12 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C99BBACCA3 for ; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 13:37:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from byrnejb@harte-lyne.ca) Received: from inet08.hamilton.harte-lyne.ca (inet08.hamilton.harte-lyne.ca [216.185.71.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "inet08.hamilton.harte-lyne.ca", Issuer "CA HLL ISSUER 01" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 01C1519AB for ; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 13:37:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from byrnejb@harte-lyne.ca) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by inet08.hamilton.harte-lyne.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7624B61FB2; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 09:27:43 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at harte-lyne.ca Received: from inet08.hamilton.harte-lyne.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (inet08.hamilton.harte-lyne.ca [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wv4_qqKEeBKU; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 09:27:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: from webmail.harte-lyne.ca (inet04.hamilton.harte-lyne.ca [216.185.71.24]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by inet08.hamilton.harte-lyne.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B1ADD60D82; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 09:27:39 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=harte-lyne.ca; s=dkim_hll; t=1470230860; bh=u8QyEbawB5ZNVBpiXQJ7xXpWDrg2FcMcKbNgg1PWd+Q=; h=In-Reply-To:References:Date:Subject:From:To:Cc:Reply-To; b=Z429nPaf54T5AbOl+aVrsgh78K4zd/NNPEXH9HzLVMfNC5bXD+s7J3yxDHKmn+ByS wDDMAY7YSYj70WIxId6WNOOMgqlkmo+r0ltdwo0l4X8ThWFex4jpoEPxUfLhLuZJkt pTmgRRKK7tqgpeN14e3+lfdBY4VkemvRNFcpc27IMb/4GjQZ8sW3+t6PBKrV18kYJd tf6hPrUuZ6lpSkS4zgWZKOgncj8ekKDzzqLsVNWs+1JRaDziMUBeasaprnXbqbgl7W ch4DAWCIWk6S4gWj6SV8+wOTYmGIziySnsHDIHXEhfWmFP5/ah/UZ8lRA4859sUXnm 3fmX02Csp8b3w== Received: from 216.185.71.44 (SquirrelMail authenticated user byrnejb_hll) by webmail.harte-lyne.ca with HTTP; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 09:27:40 -0400 Message-ID: <76e2e19772540a3d5c9a291f75491870.squirrel@webmail.harte-lyne.ca> In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2016 09:27:40 -0400 Subject: Re: no beep any more (SOLVED) From: "James B. Byrne" To: "Ian Smith" Cc: "Matthias Apitz" , "Warren Block" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Reply-To: byrnejb@harte-lyne.ca User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.22-4.el6 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2016 13:37:12 -0000 On Tue, August 2, 2016 11:59, Ian Smith wrote: l glad you managed to solve it, despite our 'help' :) > > Two questions: Do values apart than 50 provide different beep volumes, > or is it off/on? And does 'kldload speaker ; spkrtest' work with it? > I am guessing that 50:50 is the balance between right and left. So 0 :0 is nothing. 50:00 might be 50% left 0% right and so forth. Are values greater than 100 permitted? -- *** e-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** Do NOT transmit sensitive data via e-Mail Do NOT open attachments nor follow links sent by e-Mail James B. Byrne mailto:ByrneJB@Harte-Lyne.ca Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca 9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241 Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757 Canada L8E 3C3 From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Aug 3 14:05:57 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3522DBAD451 for ; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 14:05:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brandon.wandersee@gmail.com) Received: from mail-io0-f180.google.com (mail-io0-f180.google.com [209.85.223.180]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C57E1B0B for ; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 14:05:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brandon.wandersee@gmail.com) Received: by mail-io0-f180.google.com with SMTP id q83so244498499iod.1 for ; Wed, 03 Aug 2016 07:05:56 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:references:user-agent:from:to:cc:subject :in-reply-to:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=U/sPOdPXYA2/1aFNMbwfJuPMhN+ffx1YRSjtQAmY78U=; b=d58vmVyzni+0zCeBCvyHcOMqZudvrKVVl8euRU3JtSKNJoPpwgzTsJ/jTJx2tLCLaX oM0FRbVQLwFZNDGU3qdu4jKXTOvJWNVKI5j+H/Z+DIz33khRoZkEdBCWhAS/ThA5W+Pr CnLBB0Myl7a5atuH5J5g9oFCcj4aNHTMpm9GnU3u/Rm/IEDb2t404ta0PyI6m5WfMkNI ZwgJfeifG2kguITHh8SYqCWt3ln4MujWTwoA5Z472uGr+NSgIYrRXBeyYnpcViTEGFPk dPtBZseceAxVSqrQG4yV+S4a1t8hx45AOGZmXozzeIWEvZxNWS8LYV1QASICRyb19MS1 ph1A== X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoouvxCEamiHIwHXO+GJJR1C8NKvqJJpNg6848NNpVRHmrn1FeW0WXnDqdhB1ha4jmFg== X-Received: by 10.107.6.216 with SMTP id f85mr68194931ioi.14.1470232841858; Wed, 03 Aug 2016 07:00:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from WorkBox.Home.gmail.com (63-231-169-113.mpls.qwest.net. [63.231.169.113]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w138sm3554948itc.8.2016.08.03.07.00.39 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Wed, 03 Aug 2016 07:00:40 -0700 (PDT) References: <117bb75c-aa6a-d562-c971-d0bab742f5ad@radel.com> User-agent: mu4e 0.9.16; emacs 24.5.1 From: Brandon J. Wandersee To: Jon Radel Cc: "William A. Mahaffey III" , FreeBSD Questions !!!! Subject: Re: Ominous smartd messages .... In-reply-to: <117bb75c-aa6a-d562-c971-d0bab742f5ad@radel.com> Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2016 09:00:38 -0500 Message-ID: <8637mmdkah.fsf@WorkBox.Home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2016 14:05:57 -0000 Jon Radel writes: > I've read reasonable sounding commentary from people running very, very > large collections of hard drives that there is a high enough correlation > between this error and the drive going to heck sooner rather than later > that they take this as a sign to replace. [Can't find reference right now.] While there's no way to know from the error message alone just what will happen to the disk in the coming days, the general reasoning is this: sectors are not physically segregated. They all sit on the same platter. Several bad sectors occuring in a short period might be a sign of physical fault in the platter, and if that fault is real then stress from the platter spinning will likely cause that fault to spread. So some people conclude that the appearance of several bad sectors in a short period should just be a signal to replace the disk immediately. -- :: Brandon J. Wandersee :: brandon.wandersee@gmail.com :: -------------------------------------------------- :: 'The best design is as little design as possible.' :: --- Dieter Rams ---------------------------------- From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Aug 3 14:09:37 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1398BBAD5D5 for ; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 14:09:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jon@radel.com) Received: from radel.com (fly.radel.com [70.184.242.170]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.radel.com", Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B510B1C9E for ; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 14:09:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jon@radel.com) X-CGP-ClamAV-Result: CLEAN X-VirusScanner: Niversoft's CGPClamav Helper v1.18.7 (ClamAV engine v0.98.7) Received: from [2001:470:880a:4389:15ed:26:68d2:cb24] (account jon@radel.com HELO gravenstein.local) by radel.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.1.10 _community_) with ESMTPSA id 1130828; Wed, 03 Aug 2016 14:09:32 +0000 Subject: Re: Ominous smartd messages .... To: "Brandon J. Wandersee" References: <117bb75c-aa6a-d562-c971-d0bab742f5ad@radel.com> <8637mmdkah.fsf@WorkBox.Home> Cc: "William A. Mahaffey III" , FreeBSD Questions !!!! From: Jon Radel Message-ID: <7f1afc31-7eda-ba4c-41ea-046a091d6055@radel.com> Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2016 10:09:32 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <8637mmdkah.fsf@WorkBox.Home> Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha-256; boundary="------------ms070404060603090000010000" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2016 14:09:37 -0000 This is a cryptographically signed message in MIME format. --------------ms070404060603090000010000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 8/3/16 10:00 AM, Brandon J. Wandersee wrote: >=20 > Jon Radel writes: >=20 >> I've read reasonable sounding commentary from people running very, ver= y >> large collections of hard drives that there is a high enough correlati= on >> between this error and the drive going to heck sooner rather than late= r >> that they take this as a sign to replace. [Can't find reference right= now.] >=20 > While there's no way to know from the error message alone just what wil= l > happen to the disk in the coming days, the general reasoning is this: > sectors are not physically segregated. They all sit on the same > platter. Several bad sectors occuring in a short period might be a sign= > of physical fault in the platter, and if that fault is real then stress= > from the platter spinning will likely cause that fault to spread. So > some people conclude that the appearance of several bad sectors in a > short period should just be a signal to replace the disk immediately. >=20 If I remember the discussion well enough (sad that I can't find it) my use of "correlation" was precise. They actually manage enough drives (thousands) and kept enough records to allow for statistical analysis which indicate that this smartd error correlates very well with failure within [I wish I could remember] timeframe. Do please excuse the utter lack of footnotes. :-( --=20 --Jon Radel jon@radel.com --------------ms070404060603090000010000 Content-Type: application/pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s" Content-Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExDzANBglghkgBZQMEAgEFADCABgkqhkiG9w0BBwEAAKCC Cq8wggSvMIIDl6ADAgECAhEA4CPLFRKDU4mtYW56VGdrITANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQsFADBvMQsw CQYDVQQGEwJTRTEUMBIGA1UEChMLQWRkVHJ1c3QgQUIxJjAkBgNVBAsTHUFkZFRydXN0IEV4 dGVybmFsIFRUUCBOZXR3b3JrMSIwIAYDVQQDExlBZGRUcnVzdCBFeHRlcm5hbCBDQSBSb290 MB4XDTE0MTIyMjAwMDAwMFoXDTIwMDUzMDEwNDgzOFowgZsxCzAJBgNVBAYTAkdCMRswGQYD VQQIExJHcmVhdGVyIE1hbmNoZXN0ZXIxEDAOBgNVBAcTB1NhbGZvcmQxGjAYBgNVBAoTEUNP TU9ETyBDQSBMaW1pdGVkMUEwPwYDVQQDEzhDT01PRE8gU0hBLTI1NiBDbGllbnQgQXV0aGVu dGljYXRpb24gYW5kIFNlY3VyZSBFbWFpbCBDQTCCASIwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADggEPADCC AQoCggEBAImxDdp6UxlOcFIdvFamBia3uEngludRq/HwWhNJFaO0jBtgvHpRQqd5jKQi3xdh TpHVdiMKFNNKAn+2HQmAbqUEPdm6uxb+oYepLkNSQxZ8rzJQyKZPWukI2M+TJZx7iOgwZOak +FaA/SokFDMXmaxE5WmLo0YGS8Iz1OlAnwawsayTQLm1CJM6nCpToxDbPSBhPFUDjtlOdiUC ISn6o3xxdk/u4V+B6ftUgNvDezVSt4TeIj0sMC0xf1m9UjewM2ktQ+v61qXxl3dnUYzZ7ifr vKUHOHaMpKk4/9+M9QOsSb7K93OZOg8yq5yVOhM9DkY6V3RhUL7GQD/L5OKfoiECAwEAAaOC ARcwggETMB8GA1UdIwQYMBaAFK29mHo0tCb3+sQmVO8DveAky1QaMB0GA1UdDgQWBBSSYWuC 4aKgqk/sZ/HCo/e0gADB7DAOBgNVHQ8BAf8EBAMCAYYwEgYDVR0TAQH/BAgwBgEB/wIBADAd BgNVHSUEFjAUBggrBgEFBQcDAgYIKwYBBQUHAwQwEQYDVR0gBAowCDAGBgRVHSAAMEQGA1Ud HwQ9MDswOaA3oDWGM2h0dHA6Ly9jcmwudXNlcnRydXN0LmNvbS9BZGRUcnVzdEV4dGVybmFs Q0FSb290LmNybDA1BggrBgEFBQcBAQQpMCcwJQYIKwYBBQUHMAGGGWh0dHA6Ly9vY3NwLnVz ZXJ0cnVzdC5jb20wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQELBQADggEBABsqbqxVwTqriMXY7c1V86prYSvACRAj mQ/FZmpvsfW0tXdeDwJhAN99Bf4Ss6SAgAD8+x1banICCkG8BbrBWNUmwurVTYT7/oKYz1gb 4yJjnFL4uwU2q31Ypd6rO2Pl2tVz7+zg+3vio//wQiOcyraNTT7kSxgDsqgt1Ni7QkuQaYUQ 26Y3NOh74AEQpZzKOsefT4g0bopl0BqKu6ncyso20fT8wmQpNa/WsadxEdIDQ7GPPprsnjJT 9HaSyoY0B7ksyuYcStiZDcGG4pCS+1pCaiMhEOllx/XVu37qjIUgAmLq0ToHLFnFmTPyOInl tukWeh95FPZKEBom+nyK+5swggX4MIIE4KADAgECAhBzVOU8fWu0zQ1gaQ38zgEbMA0GCSqG SIb3DQEBCwUAMIGbMQswCQYDVQQGEwJHQjEbMBkGA1UECBMSR3JlYXRlciBNYW5jaGVzdGVy MRAwDgYDVQQHEwdTYWxmb3JkMRowGAYDVQQKExFDT01PRE8gQ0EgTGltaXRlZDFBMD8GA1UE AxM4Q09NT0RPIFNIQS0yNTYgQ2xpZW50IEF1dGhlbnRpY2F0aW9uIGFuZCBTZWN1cmUgRW1h aWwgQ0EwHhcNMTUwMzMwMDAwMDAwWhcNMTgwMzI5MjM1OTU5WjCB+jELMAkGA1UEBhMCVVMx DjAMBgNVBBETBTIyMTUwMQswCQYDVQQIEwJWQTEUMBIGA1UEBxMLU3ByaW5nZmllbGQxGjAY BgNVBAkTETY5MTcgUmlkZ2V3YXkgRHIuMRUwEwYDVQQKEwxKb24gVC4gUmFkZWwxMjAwBgNV BAsTKUlzc3VlZCB0aHJvdWdoIEpvbiBULiBSYWRlbCBFLVBLSSBNYW5hZ2VyMR8wHQYDVQQL ExZDb3Jwb3JhdGUgU2VjdXJlIEVtYWlsMRIwEAYDVQQDEwlKb24gUmFkZWwxHDAaBgkqhkiG 9w0BCQEWDWpvbkByYWRlbC5jb20wggEiMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4IBDwAwggEKAoIBAQDe 1Rth9hbQqaODn++C5dVAQH9nM2VH3oPazZufOwmIG2SXI/v3PuemcQQ3JkhmpQ06gYszyXbk TCLsqvEfalYj81jdt/K5lT4aVdj0LfJIWyTcU95V2rsCuHsSvn/PnIcsEtXg53rCtqS4EOtJ 9u3rY2hP8YCiyz1yY3mn4nKJs93MHG4AkXYuVpzfaIADETcVrA+razvXEfnDJXXDZZ9ZuuV1 06yIovOvhYWSlaVu8nrSHJjXFZI2IXwgIeVBoMih3yu6LLj14I/YdZ0rIA8K+UNB+NW6Ri3u wHXBbr4jh3ZqkrqIVUrf1VeybhdrJcdqXdMNHjKDSlCoaxYRbLy1AgMBAAGjggHVMIIB0TAf BgNVHSMEGDAWgBSSYWuC4aKgqk/sZ/HCo/e0gADB7DAdBgNVHQ4EFgQUz9YB10WEfBNHskRw o/0vh8qaQuwwDgYDVR0PAQH/BAQDAgWgMAwGA1UdEwEB/wQCMAAwHQYDVR0lBBYwFAYIKwYB BQUHAwQGCCsGAQUFBwMCMEYGA1UdIAQ/MD0wOwYMKwYBBAGyMQECAQMFMCswKQYIKwYBBQUH AgEWHWh0dHBzOi8vc2VjdXJlLmNvbW9kby5uZXQvQ1BTMF0GA1UdHwRWMFQwUqBQoE6GTGh0 dHA6Ly9jcmwuY29tb2RvY2EuY29tL0NPTU9ET1NIQTI1NkNsaWVudEF1dGhlbnRpY2F0aW9u YW5kU2VjdXJlRW1haWxDQS5jcmwwgZAGCCsGAQUFBwEBBIGDMIGAMFgGCCsGAQUFBzAChkxo dHRwOi8vY3J0LmNvbW9kb2NhLmNvbS9DT01PRE9TSEEyNTZDbGllbnRBdXRoZW50aWNhdGlv bmFuZFNlY3VyZUVtYWlsQ0EuY3J0MCQGCCsGAQUFBzABhhhodHRwOi8vb2NzcC5jb21vZG9j YS5jb20wGAYDVR0RBBEwD4ENam9uQHJhZGVsLmNvbTANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQsFAAOCAQEAS1Pe +gBgP+SQ/a5I5e7zX0Rg0DhH378LHlZixJgS6LfCPL2edKMUQi3Th9GXfLjdeyeWuMWoz925 ZzBHcPwkBeH+iM/AEhu0Dhi0kop/p66g9tEPJUZ/KDsqxddNDrD0Typn3/33pHTjJEDqydzA gwB0Nn8blpMbqSwT+j8wuPakfLsj1cSDzXrTLLsmIQB7auAyaYXdWyW8Yqw336rLUCvjOUfn qOOyjVsieTw/0PLoOHJaGyez+VtV4eyi6p1SNiX32A+fvxBMzKQLCokE43cXItc9Okzq//f2 fuvGp17r8mpm4OjjM5E2kwsg9bBPUBMR4/sxosKVLn0o9rxlozGCBEEwggQ9AgEBMIGwMIGb MQswCQYDVQQGEwJHQjEbMBkGA1UECBMSR3JlYXRlciBNYW5jaGVzdGVyMRAwDgYDVQQHEwdT YWxmb3JkMRowGAYDVQQKExFDT01PRE8gQ0EgTGltaXRlZDFBMD8GA1UEAxM4Q09NT0RPIFNI QS0yNTYgQ2xpZW50IEF1dGhlbnRpY2F0aW9uIGFuZCBTZWN1cmUgRW1haWwgQ0ECEHNU5Tx9 a7TNDWBpDfzOARswDQYJYIZIAWUDBAIBBQCgggJhMBgGCSqGSIb3DQEJAzELBgkqhkiG9w0B BwEwHAYJKoZIhvcNAQkFMQ8XDTE2MDgwMzE0MDkzMlowLwYJKoZIhvcNAQkEMSIEINnvTVhG amW/dEVtX6SMg5WBe6SFI+s720SBS7CA4YnkMGwGCSqGSIb3DQEJDzFfMF0wCwYJYIZIAWUD BAEqMAsGCWCGSAFlAwQBAjAKBggqhkiG9w0DBzAOBggqhkiG9w0DAgICAIAwDQYIKoZIhvcN AwICAUAwBwYFKw4DAgcwDQYIKoZIhvcNAwICASgwgcEGCSsGAQQBgjcQBDGBszCBsDCBmzEL MAkGA1UEBhMCR0IxGzAZBgNVBAgTEkdyZWF0ZXIgTWFuY2hlc3RlcjEQMA4GA1UEBxMHU2Fs Zm9yZDEaMBgGA1UEChMRQ09NT0RPIENBIExpbWl0ZWQxQTA/BgNVBAMTOENPTU9ETyBTSEEt MjU2IENsaWVudCBBdXRoZW50aWNhdGlvbiBhbmQgU2VjdXJlIEVtYWlsIENBAhBzVOU8fWu0 zQ1gaQ38zgEbMIHDBgsqhkiG9w0BCRACCzGBs6CBsDCBmzELMAkGA1UEBhMCR0IxGzAZBgNV BAgTEkdyZWF0ZXIgTWFuY2hlc3RlcjEQMA4GA1UEBxMHU2FsZm9yZDEaMBgGA1UEChMRQ09N T0RPIENBIExpbWl0ZWQxQTA/BgNVBAMTOENPTU9ETyBTSEEtMjU2IENsaWVudCBBdXRoZW50 aWNhdGlvbiBhbmQgU2VjdXJlIEVtYWlsIENBAhBzVOU8fWu0zQ1gaQ38zgEbMA0GCSqGSIb3 DQEBAQUABIIBAFQLQpJtgm8A/YcBmz2GPwpU6iL4aZX2cM3NQebn9h2+MYZqQLz5BmJT/57N PZ6KOVWylnv8qZBWlgVTUDJ5xvbr+F1FCi/4DVvo3k35cvVYXa5Xrd/4TSSrHabEaH62GUyg laDRevxsEHw0IoKXzAhOThAY2oaYgK17fvtt96R76g9o5TEATPNHJae67qixT6cTsNmXW7up KSMy3257x+xUN/EoC3J8MigzOkuRpweE+hgITcZ3xTTEmXchJX7oC8IcYlNl7Gs6UWGGwbt5 kidMSvsO0niuMHZsDkPy+fN5VlepsXWYRdOOVqZyAqAypl/KqsjgLEnyFz6XbyMAnZUAAAAA AAA= --------------ms070404060603090000010000-- From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Aug 3 16:16:57 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C4AEBADE02 for ; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 16:16:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@qeng-ho.org) Received: from bede.qeng-ho.org (bede.qeng-ho.org [217.155.128.241]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "fileserver.home.qeng-ho.org", Issuer "fileserver.home.qeng-ho.org" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 052891B08 for ; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 16:16:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@qeng-ho.org) Received: from arthur.home.qeng-ho.org (arthur.home.qeng-ho.org [172.23.1.2]) by bede.home.qeng-ho.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u73FxDg2016286; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 16:59:13 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from freebsd@qeng-ho.org) Subject: Re: Ominous smartd messages .... To: Jon Radel , "Brandon J. Wandersee" References: <117bb75c-aa6a-d562-c971-d0bab742f5ad@radel.com> <8637mmdkah.fsf@WorkBox.Home> <7f1afc31-7eda-ba4c-41ea-046a091d6055@radel.com> Cc: "William A. Mahaffey III" , FreeBSD Questions !!!! From: Arthur Chance Message-ID: Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2016 16:59:13 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <7f1afc31-7eda-ba4c-41ea-046a091d6055@radel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2016 16:16:57 -0000 On 03/08/2016 15:09, Jon Radel wrote: > On 8/3/16 10:00 AM, Brandon J. Wandersee wrote: >> >> Jon Radel writes: >> >>> I've read reasonable sounding commentary from people running very, very >>> large collections of hard drives that there is a high enough correlation >>> between this error and the drive going to heck sooner rather than later >>> that they take this as a sign to replace. [Can't find reference right now.] >> >> While there's no way to know from the error message alone just what will >> happen to the disk in the coming days, the general reasoning is this: >> sectors are not physically segregated. They all sit on the same >> platter. Several bad sectors occuring in a short period might be a sign >> of physical fault in the platter, and if that fault is real then stress >> from the platter spinning will likely cause that fault to spread. So >> some people conclude that the appearance of several bad sectors in a >> short period should just be a signal to replace the disk immediately. >> > > If I remember the discussion well enough (sad that I can't find it) my > use of "correlation" was precise. They actually manage enough drives > (thousands) and kept enough records to allow for statistical analysis > which indicate that this smartd error correlates very well with failure > within [I wish I could remember] timeframe. > > Do please excuse the utter lack of footnotes. :-( > I think everyone is probably thinking of Backblaze. This is their latest summary of drive statistics https://www.backblaze.com/blog/hard-drive-failure-rates-q2-2016/ And this is their take on which SMART metrics matter https://www.backblaze.com/blog/hard-drive-smart-stats/ -- Moore's Law of Mad Science: Every eighteen months, the minimum IQ necessary to destroy the world drops by one point. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Aug 3 16:40:56 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 794D6BAE3CA for ; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 16:40:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zarniwhoop@ntlworld.com) Received: from know-smtprelay-omc-10.server.virginmedia.net (know-smtprelay-omc-10.server.virginmedia.net [80.0.253.74]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE59E10CD for ; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 16:40:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zarniwhoop@ntlworld.com) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([81.100.29.190]) by know-smtprelay-10-imp with bizsmtp id Sgfd1t00s466fER01gfdgj; Wed, 03 Aug 2016 17:39:37 +0100 X-Originating-IP: [81.100.29.190] X-Spam: 0 X-Authority: v=2.1 cv=Ha/pNXw8 c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=+He7s6SjlwGdCRwhjLOitA==:117 a=+He7s6SjlwGdCRwhjLOitA==:17 a=L9H7d07YOLsA:10 a=9cW_t1CCXrUA:10 a=s5jvgZ67dGcA:10 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=7z1cN_iqozsA:10 a=-Z53KwaH7bQ1aHMzd98A:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 Received: by localhost.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 500) id B8BF860053; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 17:39:37 +0100 (BST) Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2016 17:39:37 +0100 From: Ken Moffat To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Ominous smartd messages .... Message-ID: <20160803163937.GA21629@milliways.localdomain> References: <020caa94-b329-d5a6-5bd4-bfcc575c039f@freebsd.org> <10b1ff8b-c738-3cee-30bb-9812f75436c1@hiwaay.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <10b1ff8b-c738-3cee-30bb-9812f75436c1@hiwaay.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.2 (2016-07-01) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2016 16:40:56 -0000 On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 07:37:50AM -0453, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: > On 08/03/16 07:24, Matthew Seaman wrote: > > On 08/03/16 04:41, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: > > > My question is: Are these messages benign, or am I in the market for > > > more hardware ? *ANY* more questions, please ask. TIA & have a good one. > > It doesn't look particularly good. Do you run the smartd selftests at > > all? Worth giving that a go -- > > > > # smartctl -t long /dev/ada5 > > > > This can be done while the disk is in use without upsetting anything. > > It will scan the disk for unreadable areas. The disk does have a number > > of spare sectors it can use instead of any broken ones, but it generally > > needs to see a failed write to the affected area to trigger the > > substitution mechanism. Once you run out of substitute sectors, the > > disk is basically toast and should be replaced. With modern drives, > > seeing that mechanism in use at all typically means the drive is on the > > downward spiral and you should plan on replacing it PDQ. > > > > Cheers, > > > > Matthew > > > > Thanks, I kicked that off just now, it says it will take 169 min. to > complete, so we'll see. No more new messages overnight, maybe my luck is > good .... > I agree with Matthew, and since your custom script seemed to ignore all the items which I regard as relevant, after the long test has finished run smartctl -a on that drive and look at things like Reallocated Sector Count and Pending (if that is still present). plus any other error fields. ĸen -- `I shall take my mountains', said Lu-Tze. `The climate will be good for them.' -- Small Gods From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Aug 3 18:30:09 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F7B0BAE51D for ; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 18:30:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from smtp207.alice.it (smtp207.alice.it [82.57.200.103]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19ABA1395 for ; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 18:30:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from soth.ventu (87.16.63.56) by smtp207.alice.it (8.6.060.28) (authenticated as acanedi@alice.it) id 57175E92154563D1 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 20:24:54 +0200 Received: from alamar.ventu (alamar.local.netfence.it [10.1.2.18]) by soth.ventu (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u73IOrvB097485 for ; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 20:24:54 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) X-Authentication-Warning: soth.ventu: Host alamar.local.netfence.it [10.1.2.18] claimed to be alamar.ventu Subject: Re: Ominous smartd messages .... To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" References: <9ea1dbaf-6151-edc8-9e2a-430abe757472@holgerdanske.com> From: Andrea Venturoli Message-ID: Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2016 20:24:53 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2016 18:30:09 -0000 On 08/03/16 14:42, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: >> I would download the HGST Windows Drive Fitness Test (WinDFT) and use it >> to test all the drives. Ideally, by removing your BSD system drive, >> installing a Windows system drive, installing WinDFT, and running WinDFT >> before, during, and after you mess with the hardware. >> > That last option sounds > destructive, right ? Any other options short of that ? Thanks & TIA .... You can try with Ultimate Boot CD: you can boot HGST DFT from there without the hassle of going through Windows. You'll run the test, find the drive faulty, try repair, test again: that's (usually) not destructive. In case the last test gives positive results, watch the disk closely: sometimes it will go on for years, sometimes you'll start getting those error again within days. If that's the case, replace it. bye From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Aug 3 19:15:22 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 398C0BAE1F5 for ; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 19:15:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wam@hiwaay.net) Received: from fly.hiwaay.net (fly.hiwaay.net [216.180.54.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E1A461447 for ; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 19:15:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wam@hiwaay.net) Received: from kabini1.local (dynamic-216-186-209-65.knology.net [216.186.209.65] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by fly.hiwaay.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/fly) with ESMTP id u73JFHnR025455 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 14:15:18 -0500 Subject: Re: Ominous smartd messages .... To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <020caa94-b329-d5a6-5bd4-bfcc575c039f@freebsd.org> From: "William A. Mahaffey III" Message-ID: Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2016 14:20:47 -0453.75 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <020caa94-b329-d5a6-5bd4-bfcc575c039f@freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2016 19:15:22 -0000 On 08/03/16 07:24, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 08/03/16 04:41, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: >> My question is: Are these messages benign, or am I in the market for >> more hardware ? *ANY* more questions, please ask. TIA & have a good one. > It doesn't look particularly good. Do you run the smartd selftests at > all? Worth giving that a go -- > > # smartctl -t long /dev/ada5 > > This can be done while the disk is in use without upsetting anything. > It will scan the disk for unreadable areas. The disk does have a number > of spare sectors it can use instead of any broken ones, but it generally > needs to see a failed write to the affected area to trigger the > substitution mechanism. Once you run out of substitute sectors, the > disk is basically toast and should be replaced. With modern drives, > seeing that mechanism in use at all typically means the drive is on the > downward spiral and you should plan on replacing it PDQ. > > Cheers, > > Matthew > > OK, after completion of the above command, I got the following: [root@devbox, /etc, 2:18:44pm] 372 % smartctl -l selftest /dev/ada5 smartctl 6.4 2015-06-04 r4109 [FreeBSD 9.3-RELEASE-p33 amd64] (local build) Copyright (C) 2002-15, Bruce Allen, Christian Franke, www.smartmontools.org === START OF READ SMART DATA SECTION === SMART Self-test log structure revision number 1 Num Test_Description Status Remaining LifeTime(hours) LBA_of_first_error # 1 Extended offline Completed: read failure 90% 6671 167940256 [root@devbox, /etc, 2:18:57pm] 373 % What does this mean ? -- William A. Mahaffey III ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war ever devised by man." -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Aug 3 19:17:01 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F786BAE2B7 for ; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 19:17:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: from ms-10.1blu.de (ms-10.1blu.de [178.254.4.101]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6242E1583 for ; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 19:17:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: from [82.113.121.185] (helo=localhost.unixarea.de) by ms-10.1blu.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1bV0s7-0007Ab-3D; Wed, 03 Aug 2016 20:26:27 +0200 Received: from localhost.my.domain (c720-r292778-amd64 [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.unixarea.de (8.15.2/8.14.9) with ESMTPS id u73IQNut001959 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 3 Aug 2016 20:26:23 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: (from guru@localhost) by localhost.my.domain (8.15.2/8.14.9/Submit) id u73IQJNs001958; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 20:26:19 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) X-Authentication-Warning: localhost.my.domain: guru set sender to guru@unixarea.de using -f Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2016 20:26:18 +0200 From: Matthias Apitz To: "James B. Byrne" Cc: Ian Smith , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: no beep any more (SOLVED) Message-ID: <20160803182618.GA1916@c720-r292778-amd64> Reply-To: Matthias Apitz Mail-Followup-To: Matthias Apitz , "James B. Byrne" , Ian Smith , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <76e2e19772540a3d5c9a291f75491870.squirrel@webmail.harte-lyne.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <76e2e19772540a3d5c9a291f75491870.squirrel@webmail.harte-lyne.ca> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT r292778 (amd64) User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-Con-Id: 51246 X-Con-U: 0-guru X-Originating-IP: 82.113.121.185 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2016 19:17:01 -0000 El día Wednesday, August 03, 2016 a las 09:27:40AM -0400, James B. Byrne escribió: > > On Tue, August 2, 2016 11:59, Ian Smith wrote: > l glad you managed to solve it, despite our 'help' :) > > > > Two questions: Do values apart than 50 provide different beep volumes, > > or is it off/on? And does 'kldload speaker ; spkrtest' work with it? > > > > I am guessing that 50:50 is the balance between right and left. So 0 > :0 is nothing. 50:00 might be 50% left 0% right and so forth. yes, correctly > > Are values greater than 100 permitted? no, this is a percentage value; check mixer(1) man page; btw: I have here some funny dialog from the ChromeOS forum where I asked for some help, not about software but hardware of the C720; it seems that they do not like that FreeBSD is installed on their beloved Chromebook :-) funny to read: https://productforums.google.com/forum/#!topic/chromebook-central/-MXyMACfcCU;context-place=forum/chromebook-central Matthias said: Hello, The (high-resolution) picture of the mother board of the C720, which can be found here https://www.chromium.org/chromium-os/developer-information-for-chrome-os-devices/acer-c720-chromebook shows right of the screw 7 a black 2-wire cable, connected to the motherboard and ending below in some black cylinder. Is this cylinder the PC-speaker of the C720 (I'm not talking about the stereo laud speakers) and if so, of which type/manufacture it is? Or is this some kind of backup battery? Jim Dantin said: It's a capacitor that is too large to fit on the circuit board, so they mounted it on a cable. You can see a second cable with two capacitors directly above the battery to the left of screw 6. Replacement ones are commonly available on eBay if you need one. http://www.ebay.com/sch/i.html?_from=R40&_trksid=p2050601.m570.l1313.TR0.TRC0.H0.Xc720+capacitor+cable.TRS0&_nkw=c720+capacitor+cable&_sacat=0 ... powermatt said: In addition to what Jim said; we don't support alternative uses of Chrome OS hardware for the same reason we don't support third-party applications; there's no way we could ever cover or know about every possible interaction of Chrome OS hardware and software. It's not a reasonable expectation. Matthias said: Well, I say thanks for all the comments, the helping ones and the others, and I could solve the problem with a simple command 'mixer igain 50'. Re/ the word 'Chromebook', I think that the Acer C720 is such a nice hardware that it deserves something better than ChromeOS. powermatt said: It seems to me you should have purchased a device that better suits your needs, rather than trying to force a Chromebook to be something it is not. Matthias said: Wrong conclusion of my post; the Acer C720 is one of the best netbooks I ever purchased and it works fine with FreeBSD. powermatt said: You are of course entitled to your opinion. As this topic does not cover a supported use of the hardware, I am going to lock it here. -- Matthias Apitz, ✉ guru@unixarea.de, ⌂ http://www.unixarea.de/ ☎ +49-176-38902045 "Wer übersieht, dass wir uns den anderen weggenommen haben und sie uns wiederhaben wollen, kann von den Kämpfen der letzten Tage keinen verstehen. Und kann natürlich auch keinen dieser Kämpfe bestehen." Hermann Kant in jW 1.10.1989 From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Aug 3 19:20:28 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83806BAE440 for ; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 19:20:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wam@hiwaay.net) Received: from fly.hiwaay.net (fly.hiwaay.net [216.180.54.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4277318AB for ; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 19:20:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wam@hiwaay.net) Received: from kabini1.local (dynamic-216-186-209-65.knology.net [216.186.209.65] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by fly.hiwaay.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/fly) with ESMTP id u73JKPSU028148 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 14:20:26 -0500 Subject: Re: Ominous smartd messages .... To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <020caa94-b329-d5a6-5bd4-bfcc575c039f@freebsd.org> <10b1ff8b-c738-3cee-30bb-9812f75436c1@hiwaay.net> <20160803163937.GA21629@milliways.localdomain> From: "William A. Mahaffey III" Message-ID: <52094d0d-32bc-19e9-4cef-d67ed4e7aeb0@hiwaay.net> Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2016 14:25:55 -0453.75 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160803163937.GA21629@milliways.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2016 19:20:28 -0000 On 08/03/16 11:45, Ken Moffat wrote: > On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 07:37:50AM -0453, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: >> On 08/03/16 07:24, Matthew Seaman wrote: >>> On 08/03/16 04:41, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: >>>> My question is: Are these messages benign, or am I in the market for >>>> more hardware ? *ANY* more questions, please ask. TIA & have a good one. >>> It doesn't look particularly good. Do you run the smartd selftests at >>> all? Worth giving that a go -- >>> >>> # smartctl -t long /dev/ada5 >>> >>> This can be done while the disk is in use without upsetting anything. >>> It will scan the disk for unreadable areas. The disk does have a number >>> of spare sectors it can use instead of any broken ones, but it generally >>> needs to see a failed write to the affected area to trigger the >>> substitution mechanism. Once you run out of substitute sectors, the >>> disk is basically toast and should be replaced. With modern drives, >>> seeing that mechanism in use at all typically means the drive is on the >>> downward spiral and you should plan on replacing it PDQ. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> Matthew >>> >> Thanks, I kicked that off just now, it says it will take 169 min. to >> complete, so we'll see. No more new messages overnight, maybe my luck is >> good .... >> > I agree with Matthew, and since your custom script seemed to ignore > all the items which I regard as relevant, after the long test has > finished run smartctl -a on that drive and look at things like > Reallocated Sector Count and Pending (if that is still present). > plus any other error fields. > > ĸen OK: [root@devbox, /etc, 2:22:57pm] 373 % smartctl -a /dev/ada5 smartctl 6.4 2015-06-04 r4109 [FreeBSD 9.3-RELEASE-p33 amd64] (local build) Copyright (C) 2002-15, Bruce Allen, Christian Franke, www.smartmontools.org === START OF INFORMATION SECTION === Model Family: HGST Travelstar 7K1000 Device Model: HGST HTS721010A9E630 Serial Number: JR10046P1E69HN LU WWN Device Id: 5 000cca 7dcd41800 Firmware Version: JB0OA3J0 User Capacity: 1,000,204,886,016 bytes [1.00 TB] Sector Sizes: 512 bytes logical, 4096 bytes physical Rotation Rate: 7200 rpm Form Factor: 2.5 inches Device is: In smartctl database [for details use: -P show] ATA Version is: ATA8-ACS T13/1699-D revision 6 SATA Version is: SATA 3.0, 6.0 Gb/s (current: 6.0 Gb/s) Local Time is: Wed Aug 3 14:23:03 2016 MCDT SMART support is: Available - device has SMART capability. SMART support is: Enabled === START OF READ SMART DATA SECTION === SMART overall-health self-assessment test result: PASSED General SMART Values: Offline data collection status: (0x00) Offline data collection activity was never started. Auto Offline Data Collection: Disabled. Self-test execution status: ( 121) The previous self-test completed having the read element of the test failed. Total time to complete Offline data collection: ( 45) seconds. Offline data collection capabilities: (0x5b) SMART execute Offline immediate. Auto Offline data collection on/off support. Suspend Offline collection upon new command. Offline surface scan supported. Self-test supported. No Conveyance Self-test supported. Selective Self-test supported. SMART capabilities: (0x0003) Saves SMART data before entering power-saving mode. Supports SMART auto save timer. Error logging capability: (0x01) Error logging supported. General Purpose Logging supported. Short self-test routine recommended polling time: ( 2) minutes. Extended self-test routine recommended polling time: ( 169) minutes. SCT capabilities: (0x003d) SCT Status supported. SCT Error Recovery Control supported. SCT Feature Control supported. SCT Data Table supported. SMART Attributes Data Structure revision number: 16 Vendor Specific SMART Attributes with Thresholds: ID# ATTRIBUTE_NAME FLAG VALUE WORST THRESH TYPE UPDATED WHEN_FAILED RAW_VALUE 1 Raw_Read_Error_Rate 0x000b 091 091 062 Pre-fail Always - 3538944 2 Throughput_Performance 0x0005 100 100 040 Pre-fail Offline - 0 3 Spin_Up_Time 0x0007 100 100 033 Pre-fail Always - 2 4 Start_Stop_Count 0x0012 100 100 000 Old_age Always - 5 5 Reallocated_Sector_Ct 0x0033 100 100 005 Pre-fail Always - 0 7 Seek_Error_Rate 0x000b 100 100 067 Pre-fail Always - 0 8 Seek_Time_Performance 0x0005 100 100 040 Pre-fail Offline - 0 9 Power_On_Hours 0x0012 085 085 000 Old_age Always - 6678 10 Spin_Retry_Count 0x0013 100 100 060 Pre-fail Always - 0 12 Power_Cycle_Count 0x0032 100 100 000 Old_age Always - 5 191 G-Sense_Error_Rate 0x000a 100 100 000 Old_age Always - 0 192 Power-Off_Retract_Count 0x0032 100 100 000 Old_age Always - 2 193 Load_Cycle_Count 0x0012 034 034 000 Old_age Always - 668237 194 Temperature_Celsius 0x0002 230 230 000 Old_age Always - 26 (Min/Max 14/31) 196 Reallocated_Event_Count 0x0032 100 100 000 Old_age Always - 0 197 Current_Pending_Sector 0x0022 100 100 000 Old_age Always - 8 198 Offline_Uncorrectable 0x0008 100 100 000 Old_age Offline - 0 199 UDMA_CRC_Error_Count 0x000a 200 200 000 Old_age Always - 0 223 Load_Retry_Count 0x000a 100 100 000 Old_age Always - 0 SMART Error Log Version: 1 No Errors Logged SMART Self-test log structure revision number 1 Num Test_Description Status Remaining LifeTime(hours) LBA_of_first_error # 1 Extended offline Completed: read failure 90% 6671 167940256 SMART Selective self-test log data structure revision number 1 SPAN MIN_LBA MAX_LBA CURRENT_TEST_STATUS 1 0 0 Not_testing 2 0 0 Not_testing 3 0 0 Not_testing 4 0 0 Not_testing 5 0 0 Not_testing Selective self-test flags (0x0): After scanning selected spans, do NOT read-scan remainder of disk. If Selective self-test is pending on power-up, resume after 0 minute delay. [root@devbox, /etc, 2:23:04pm] 374 % Reallocated sectors zero (0) .... so where am I ? Thanks & TIA & have a good one. -- William A. Mahaffey III ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war ever devised by man." -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Aug 3 20:13:23 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BAC2BAE4C8 for ; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 20:13:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:c4ea:bd49:619b:6cb3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk", Issuer "infracaninophile.co.uk" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5272E121E for ; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 20:13:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from liminal.local (liminal.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3636:3bff:fed4:b0d6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 670F38679 for ; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 20:13:01 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk; dmarc=none header.from=FreeBSD.org Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/670F38679; dkim=none; dkim-atps=neutral Subject: Re: Ominous smartd messages .... To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <020caa94-b329-d5a6-5bd4-bfcc575c039f@freebsd.org> From: Matthew Seaman Message-ID: <4b35b969-606b-9084-5ce3-688eddfc5e70@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2016 21:13:00 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="u4XCUfLFKGwU4U1k02eQMoQJsrp8xMPCS" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2016 20:13:23 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --u4XCUfLFKGwU4U1k02eQMoQJsrp8xMPCS Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="wtmDRLdxu3jgTk8DGUNq88N4HTkBmf4lA" From: Matthew Seaman To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <4b35b969-606b-9084-5ce3-688eddfc5e70@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: Ominous smartd messages .... References: <020caa94-b329-d5a6-5bd4-bfcc575c039f@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: --wtmDRLdxu3jgTk8DGUNq88N4HTkBmf4lA Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 03/08/2016 20:13, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: > What does this mean ? That there's a bad spot on the disk, which may also mean that you've got a corrupted filesystem -- depends if the bad spot was in use by zfs or not. 'zpool scrub' should tell you if the filesystem is corrupted. Time to replace the drive. You should be able to convert the vdev that contains the failing drive into a mirror temporarily, and sync the data without downtime beyond maybe a few reboots to install the new disk (assuming you have space to plug the new drive in without unplugging any of the old ones). Failing that, you're going to need to rebuild the zpool from scratch and restore your data from backup. Also, the fact that you have how ever many terabytes of data with no resilience just makes me feel on edge -- and it's not even my data. Strongly recommend rebuilding your zpool as a RAIDZ of 8 drives -- yes, you'll end up with less usable space, but you and your data will survive failure of a drive and a 'zpool scrub' will be able to fix things even if a bad spot on one drive has scrambled some of your data. --wtmDRLdxu3jgTk8DGUNq88N4HTkBmf4lA-- --u4XCUfLFKGwU4U1k02eQMoQJsrp8xMPCS Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJXolBMXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ2NTNBNjhCOTEzQTRFNkNGM0UxRTEzMjZC QjIzQUY1MThFMUE0MDEzAAoJELsjr1GOGkAT0jIP/iZ/7nZ/IplID4ajSYFZ469y xX7Yibm3sCeHB/NQ1vt6Fai+k1kjgkKaVcji5QOGNraGO5ogIcWsYVPa+byMjS1z 9Z6bTOhmcboPuPJ1t+VYmTgzutW9aKHNp21nOjZvWbCNRBQ12kipEudtWECcpsdH pu3nb1DOrd3CySvk7K8lA2NLTzP4RSvD7MlhtJhbFElrHvAxYzcyLFkJeHtlf9TS kQ2EdOVgkGw/uoUthQtDRXk0s2iXdYj/9h0pWoQJGf6oLJazMa7Xx2ELNmAdQZfV nYSuGzT+ZBmYifFo2TuKssjEbmJ78LxTKb61TdOtbYNDM5a/eY0weDQlN1Q7FRB5 u8mzWiszOMCoGZW+SlV6CJPYfQIJJe9kXlbWZ38s27/vBemC7LtwG4pgUwtsN//M yy4m5Wnf4DNjP34saB4aSiCoHIzqgwrXYTigd4kBUM1rGT/X1erWlrdx1YFBIGQJ guiPTN9eVn2iKehh4ayZCNcoryPlNuV6gPuwuCAmrB1zZsP4ZU50wkOGWycMtBfa p4Azq3aaLR11kjPWQupmXoMq+iX0we8Ix9oF/3tRlwur4IdOyY8OWp+12QISdw6g M7Eajn2UIBVHvgw9zhj/bxz9rkZAOdohcGaAPIV0zxh5ejWcj03CM4w0UI4PcHku 5DvR5shWc/BMy6CAWtdP =PSkx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --u4XCUfLFKGwU4U1k02eQMoQJsrp8xMPCS-- From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Aug 3 20:29:20 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D421BAE7F5 for ; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 20:29:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wam@hiwaay.net) Received: from fly.hiwaay.net (fly.hiwaay.net [216.180.54.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C6311A28 for ; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 20:29:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wam@hiwaay.net) Received: from kabini1.local (dynamic-216-186-209-65.knology.net [216.186.209.65] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by fly.hiwaay.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/fly) with ESMTP id u73KTHR8004533 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 15:29:18 -0500 Subject: Re: Ominous smartd messages .... To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <020caa94-b329-d5a6-5bd4-bfcc575c039f@freebsd.org> <4b35b969-606b-9084-5ce3-688eddfc5e70@FreeBSD.org> From: "William A. Mahaffey III" Message-ID: Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2016 15:34:47 -0453.75 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4b35b969-606b-9084-5ce3-688eddfc5e70@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2016 20:29:20 -0000 On 08/03/16 15:19, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 03/08/2016 20:13, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: >> What does this mean ? > That there's a bad spot on the disk, which may also mean that you've got > a corrupted filesystem -- depends if the bad spot was in use by zfs or > not. 'zpool scrub' should tell you if the filesystem is corrupted. Can I do that 'zpool scrub' live ? > > Time to replace the drive. You should be able to convert the vdev that > contains the failing drive into a mirror temporarily, and sync the data > without downtime beyond maybe a few reboots to install the new disk > (assuming you have space to plug the new drive in without unplugging any > of the old ones). Failing that, you're going to need to rebuild the > zpool from scratch and restore your data from backup. No spare SATA slots :-/ .... > > Also, the fact that you have how ever many terabytes of data with no > resilience just makes me feel on edge -- and it's not even my data. > > Strongly recommend rebuilding your zpool as a RAIDZ of 8 drives -- yes, > you'll end up with less usable space, but you and your data will survive > failure of a drive and a 'zpool scrub' will be able to fix things even > if a bad spot on one drive has scrambled some of your data. I was/am already thinking along those lines, w/ 1 complication. I have another box (NetBSD 6.1.5) w/ a RAID5 that I wound up building w/ mis-aligned disk/RAID blocks in spite of a fair amount of effort to avoid that. I/O writes are horrible, 15-20 MB/s. My understanding is that RAIDZn is like RAID5 in many ways & that you always want 2^n+1 (3,5,9, ...) drives in a RAID5 to mitigate those misalignments, presumably in a RAIDZ also. Is that so w/ RAIDZ as well ? If so, I lose more than a small amount of total storage, which is why I went as I did when I built the box whenever that was. -- William A. Mahaffey III ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war ever devised by man." -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Aug 3 20:35:23 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE2F1BAEB9A for ; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 20:35:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zarniwhoop@ntlworld.com) Received: from know-smtprelay-omc-10.server.virginmedia.net (know-smtprelay-omc-10.server.virginmedia.net [80.0.253.74]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D6A01EAF for ; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 20:35:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zarniwhoop@ntlworld.com) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([81.100.29.190]) by know-smtprelay-10-imp with bizsmtp id SkbJ1t007466fER01kbJ09; Wed, 03 Aug 2016 21:35:18 +0100 X-Originating-IP: [81.100.29.190] X-Spam: 0 X-Authority: v=2.1 cv=Ha/pNXw8 c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=+He7s6SjlwGdCRwhjLOitA==:117 a=+He7s6SjlwGdCRwhjLOitA==:17 a=L9H7d07YOLsA:10 a=9cW_t1CCXrUA:10 a=s5jvgZ67dGcA:10 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=7z1cN_iqozsA:10 a=-Z53KwaH7bQ1aHMzd98A:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 Received: by localhost.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 500) id 0333260053; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 21:35:18 +0100 (BST) Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2016 21:35:17 +0100 From: Ken Moffat To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Ominous smartd messages .... Message-ID: <20160803203517.GA26729@milliways.localdomain> References: <020caa94-b329-d5a6-5bd4-bfcc575c039f@freebsd.org> <10b1ff8b-c738-3cee-30bb-9812f75436c1@hiwaay.net> <20160803163937.GA21629@milliways.localdomain> <52094d0d-32bc-19e9-4cef-d67ed4e7aeb0@hiwaay.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <52094d0d-32bc-19e9-4cef-d67ed4e7aeb0@hiwaay.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.2 (2016-07-01) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2016 20:35:23 -0000 On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 02:25:55PM -0453, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: > On 08/03/16 11:45, Ken Moffat wrote: > > > > > I agree with Matthew, and since your custom script seemed to ignore > > all the items which I regard as relevant, after the long test has > > finished run smartctl -a on that drive and look at things like > > Reallocated Sector Count and Pending (if that is still present). > > plus any other error fields. > > > > ĸen > > > OK: > (pruning, and unwrapping) > Vendor Specific SMART Attributes with Thresholds: > ID# ATTRIBUTE_NAME FLAG VALUE WORST THRESH TYPE UPDATED > WHEN_FAILED RAW_VALUE > 5 Reallocated_Sector_Ct 0x0033 100 100 005 Pre-fail Always - 0 > 197 Current_Pending_Sector 0x0022 100 100 000 Old_age Always - 8 > 198 Offline_Uncorrectable 0x0008 100 100 000 Old_age Offline - 0 > At this point it hasn't managed to read 8 sectors, I assume it only reallocates afteri either succeding to read or giving up. I had this once on a RAID-1, I swapped the drive out as soon as it was convenient, and meanwhile the other drive in the mirror provided the data. Before that, on daily tests the position of the first failure did change once, so I think mine managed to read one of the failing sectors. A couple of years ago, 1TB spinning drives were the smallest commonly available from several retail suppliers - and not particularly reliable. I think I've had two 1TB drives (different brands) fail in the last 2 years. So, as with all drives, expect failures. ĸen -- `I shall take my mountains', said Lu-Tze. `The climate will be good for them.' -- Small Gods From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Aug 3 20:45:23 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CFBABAEE93 for ; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 20:45:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julien@perdition.city) Received: from relay-b02.edpnet.be (relay-b02.edpnet.be [212.71.1.222]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "edpnet.email", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certificate Authority - G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D97916D4 for ; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 20:45:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julien@perdition.city) X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1470255692-0a7b8d2a6f14cbd60001-jLrpzn Received: from mordor.lan (213.211.139.72.dyn.edpnet.net [213.211.139.72]) by relay-b02.edpnet.be with ESMTP id ykA5q3eo0Tc1jbVu (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 03 Aug 2016 22:21:33 +0200 (CEST) X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: julien@perdition.city X-Barracuda-Effective-Source-IP: 213.211.139.72.dyn.edpnet.net[213.211.139.72] X-Barracuda-Apparent-Source-IP: 213.211.139.72 Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2016 22:21:32 +0200 From: Julien Cigar To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: shrink zfs root zpool Message-ID: <20160803202131.GA3082@mordor.lan> X-ASG-Orig-Subj: shrink zfs root zpool MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="k+w/mQv8wyuph6w0" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27) X-Barracuda-Connect: 213.211.139.72.dyn.edpnet.net[213.211.139.72] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1470255692 X-Barracuda-Encrypted: ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 X-Barracuda-URL: https://212.71.1.222:443/cgi-mod/mark.cgi X-Barracuda-Scan-Msg-Size: 691 X-Virus-Scanned: by bsmtpd at edpnet.be X-Barracuda-BRTS-Status: 1 X-Barracuda-Bayes: INNOCENT GLOBAL 0.5028 1.0000 0.7500 X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 2.25 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=2.25 using global scores of TAG_LEVEL=1000.0 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=1000.0 KILL_LEVEL=6.0 tests=BSF_SC0_MV0713, BSF_SC0_MV0713_2 X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.3.31729 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.50 BSF_SC0_MV0713 Custom rule MV0713 1.00 BSF_SC0_MV0713_2 BSF_SC0_MV0713_2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2016 20:45:23 -0000 --k+w/mQv8wyuph6w0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello, I have a machine with a simple zfs root mirror pool (2 disks) that I'd=20 like to shrink and I wondered what would be the best approach to do=20 this? I was thinking of booting on a usb stick, remove one physical disk from the mirror, gpart resize the partition, create a new zpool, and finally a pair of zfs snapshot / send from the old pool to the new one .. Would that work? Any caveats? Thanks! Julien --=20 Julien Cigar Belgian Biodiversity Platform (http://www.biodiversity.be) PGP fingerprint: EEF9 F697 4B68 D275 7B11 6A25 B2BB 3710 A204 23C0 No trees were killed in the creation of this message. However, many electrons were terribly inconvenienced. --k+w/mQv8wyuph6w0 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAABCgAGBQJXolJIAAoJELK7NxCiBCPAT4cP/3CmXN9bzOPphvxix/8lSqJu AB2zHoxvJZ4q0ldiw8A1gzr/ZQIkfZyu45bXmK4+unNhtK+tmBNh5/7yoNGvDxNh Crx4QIIjJFi7WcOe014MJhLGgsnSi5I8Sa1wpYzBJJecwXbyZ+io/w2wVXvvvQTV qSykAbu1xyDXYEwMnQ6f+d+asPiZSyj+gS5sIy/27JrYAQY4/IZ+jonShyZEwC2f xkSgLj3wzKLiH4zX1lHCxpsVHIzLhpV4hauH+uruvuSX4giGlzdPYk9MbRrGv77O o1BfCCIGyyFeZvSgWrblMQh2np4YyhFsElWG+rhdkcuS4qYsZhIyBvG4WynQJS8d hZ58XWv6bpfdDpeey42kTjYJRftKH3DHupqRfuVfItWvzwqUzNnuAjFah55YG4iA sSoixEhOL2Y0piTbmcvspgqAa5s/ytWdXOckKQr1nRaBbw5ICdK1rco6vUVfZMwi jI+7RogFySjlVYKLduj8OVBw24msg5S+Rr0i0VodzR1wxMXPjgw8Z1A8XKrjooXa GjWE9O8pNYXi0wXJxJenvTsP39iVjYOUjzWZTVUgbEyXuBIwVjbsDF222ITPJ+ok AiQyjL/Bwrgb+WXitIsXe0oMrEJeOxe4vBhLRtS+XlNUvZAOK3PbVSIv5/4Tr9R/ mhE3me3YrBLBU3Uq7XbP =bWud -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --k+w/mQv8wyuph6w0-- From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Aug 3 23:47:35 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05434BAE2E3 for ; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 23:47:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "wonkity.com", Issuer "wonkity.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C693D1D98 for ; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 23:47:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id u73NlV1Q017481 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 3 Aug 2016 17:47:31 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) with ESMTP id u73NlVNe017476; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 17:47:31 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2016 17:47:31 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Ben Woods cc: "mexas@bris.ac.uk" , "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: wireless hints: AP, username, password - does not work In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <201608022211.u72MBIxR079329@mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (BSF 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Wed, 03 Aug 2016 17:47:31 -0600 (MDT) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2016 23:47:35 -0000 On Wed, 3 Aug 2016, Ben Woods wrote: > On FreeBSD, it is as you said. Assuming you have atheros, put the following > in your /etc/rc.conf (replacing your_ssid_here with the wifi SSID): > > wlans_ath0="wlan0" > ifconfig_wlan0="ssid *your_ssid_here* DHCP" > > > Run: > # service netif restart > > Once you are connected and have an IP address, open your browser and > navigate to any webpage which DOESNT USE HTTPS. I commonly use > www.distrowatch.com, but any others you know which don't use https will > work. This is the part that tricks many people, as the captive portal will > redirect all web traffic to the portal until authenticated, but https > traffic will detect the server is not who they are supposed to be and fail. > > Once authenticated, you should get a connection. Note that if can be easier > to connect with a mobile phone to confirm how it should work, and what the > SSID is etc, and then replicate on your FreeBSD laptop. This can be done in /etc/wpa_supplicant.conf with just: network={ ssid="horriblecaptiveportal" key_mgmt="NONE" } Then it is not necessary to change /etc/rc.conf. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Aug 4 00:50:44 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E088BAD102 for ; Thu, 4 Aug 2016 00:50:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brandon.wandersee@gmail.com) Received: from mail-io0-f195.google.com (mail-io0-f195.google.com [209.85.223.195]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D80051A0D for ; Thu, 4 Aug 2016 00:50:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brandon.wandersee@gmail.com) Received: by mail-io0-f195.google.com with SMTP id y195so19451634iod.0 for ; Wed, 03 Aug 2016 17:50:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:references:user-agent:from:to:cc:subject :in-reply-to:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=WPzlrkc+bmKfdjUQ9ORWFH0FosW3acSwGha49/gT9KI=; b=Z9SOMqjbDVv57w6uvu/6To5Q7m7XgXz0JnzGX8VdxbuVPikAEzoaL6dnGfVhNUG0qa XjQlIoD3YvcoPm/Ygky1pTp15vutK71WyTW6k2xh7ZXYfhkDroBt0dVIlwyw246JTqa0 X7neDzMuWWSgq3TGJvU3+I9zfkHGpxT4X4v9qo/XNpws1gPuUwrpz1qOHGpscTZNBsT9 UgoQLSXowiRqp5/fZFvCjvuO6gaKfU48m2g/jnBxS2WQ65jOYbbIROi76184ahBeDT1+ SeF0I7lZCMKK2lBsABmZaS+thK2kPt76ZqDf90Le4s7thEW8yEg5FGhhb+lEngzXCEZn a/IQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoouvFgW3ywOxAOnCzI5NOlbPSfvfQivR4caM2s6dFwrx7LsL5hwggE4n3RE3FabF9Zw== X-Received: by 10.107.16.228 with SMTP id 97mr80441085ioq.98.1470271837456; Wed, 03 Aug 2016 17:50:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from WorkBox.Home.gmail.com (174-30-197-82.mpls.qwest.net. [174.30.197.82]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 9sm4672652ior.27.2016.08.03.17.50.35 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Wed, 03 Aug 2016 17:50:36 -0700 (PDT) References: <020caa94-b329-d5a6-5bd4-bfcc575c039f@freebsd.org> <4b35b969-606b-9084-5ce3-688eddfc5e70@FreeBSD.org> User-agent: mu4e 0.9.16; emacs 24.5.1 From: Brandon J. Wandersee To: "William A. Mahaffey III" Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Ominous smartd messages .... In-reply-to: Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2016 19:50:33 -0500 Message-ID: <86eg658ihy.fsf@WorkBox.Home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2016 00:50:44 -0000 William A. Mahaffey III writes: > On 08/03/16 15:19, Matthew Seaman wrote: >> On 03/08/2016 20:13, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: >>> What does this mean ? >> That there's a bad spot on the disk, which may also mean that you've got >> a corrupted filesystem -- depends if the bad spot was in use by zfs or >> not. 'zpool scrub' should tell you if the filesystem is corrupted. > > Can I do that 'zpool scrub' live ? Ordinarily, yes. A scrub might lower performance a little while it's underway, but it's safe to use the system while you do it. However, depending on how much data you have on that pool, a scrub can take a long time to finish. A scrub of the measely ~1.8Tb on my pool takes the better part of five hours to complete. The risk I would worry about in this particular situation is whether leaving the system running long enough for a scrub to complete would result in more sectors on the disk failing, in an area already passed over by the scrub. If that happened, you'd wind up with more corrupted files (assuming there already are corrupted files in the first place due to a filesystem problem). Finding and fixing those would mean running another scrub, taking up twice the time. Ordinarily, then, I'd recommend running the scrub after replacing the disk. In this particular situation, if you want to try get out of this with absolutely no corrupted files, then if at all possible use `zfs send | zfs receive` to clone the existing pool to a new pool on another machine, and run the scrub there. The problem is that if you intend to recreate your current pool in a RAIDZ layout you'll need to back up your data, and if you back up your data using rsync (as you have been) and then restore it to the new pool using rsync, the checksums for the previously good files will be lost and the corrupted files will be given new checksums. ZFS won't realize they're corrupted. Bear in mind, though, that none of this is to say that any of your files currently are corrupted or will be corrupted. This is just a "best approach to worst case" as I see it. > I was/am already thinking along those lines, w/ 1 complication. I have > another box (NetBSD 6.1.5) w/ a RAID5 that I wound up building w/ > mis-aligned disk/RAID blocks in spite of a fair amount of effort to > avoid that. I/O writes are horrible, 15-20 MB/s. My understanding is > that RAIDZn is like RAID5 in many ways & that you always want 2^n+1 > (3,5,9, ...) drives in a RAID5 to mitigate those misalignments, > presumably in a RAIDZ also. Is that so w/ RAIDZ as well ? If so, I lose > more than a small amount of total storage, which is why I went as I did > when I built the box whenever that was. I don't have enough knowledge/experience with RAIDZ to answer your specific questions, but if nothing else you could still combine the disks into mirrored vdevs, which are more flexible than RAIDZ, but slightly less robust. You'd have a maximum of half the storage space and more redundancy than you do now (though significantly less redundancy than with a RAIDZ setup). -- :: Brandon J. Wandersee :: brandon.wandersee@gmail.com :: -------------------------------------------------- :: 'The best design is as little design as possible.' :: --- Dieter Rams ---------------------------------- From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Aug 4 02:59:11 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C0ECBAE3D4 for ; Thu, 4 Aug 2016 02:59:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wam@hiwaay.net) Received: from fly.hiwaay.net (fly.hiwaay.net [216.180.54.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3ADF4173D for ; Thu, 4 Aug 2016 02:59:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wam@hiwaay.net) Received: from kabini1.local (dynamic-216-186-209-65.knology.net [216.186.209.65] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by fly.hiwaay.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/fly) with ESMTP id u742x8nn007421 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 21:59:09 -0500 Subject: Re: Ominous smartd messages .... References: <020caa94-b329-d5a6-5bd4-bfcc575c039f@freebsd.org> <4b35b969-606b-9084-5ce3-688eddfc5e70@FreeBSD.org> <86eg658ihy.fsf@WorkBox.Home> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: "William A. Mahaffey III" Message-ID: <2c0728f3-c742-f827-402e-200bb337d6f9@hiwaay.net> Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2016 22:04:37 -0453.75 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <86eg658ihy.fsf@WorkBox.Home> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2016 02:59:11 -0000 On 08/03/16 19:56, Brandon J. Wandersee wrote: > William A. Mahaffey III writes: > >> On 08/03/16 15:19, Matthew Seaman wrote: >>> On 03/08/2016 20:13, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: >>>> What does this mean ? >>> That there's a bad spot on the disk, which may also mean that you've got >>> a corrupted filesystem -- depends if the bad spot was in use by zfs or >>> not. 'zpool scrub' should tell you if the filesystem is corrupted. >> Can I do that 'zpool scrub' live ? > Ordinarily, yes. A scrub might lower performance a little while it's > underway, but it's safe to use the system while you do it. However, > depending on how much data you have on that pool, a scrub can take a > long time to finish. A scrub of the measely ~1.8Tb on my pool takes the > better part of five hours to complete. The risk I would worry about in this > particular situation is whether leaving the system running long enough > for a scrub to complete would result in more sectors on the disk failing, > in an area already passed over by the scrub. If that happened, you'd > wind up with more corrupted files (assuming there already are corrupted > files in the first place due to a filesystem problem). Finding and > fixing those would mean running another scrub, taking up twice the time. > > Ordinarily, then, I'd recommend running the scrub after replacing the > disk. In this particular situation, if you want to try get out of this > with absolutely no corrupted files, then if at all possible use `zfs > send | zfs receive` to clone the existing pool to a new pool on another > machine, and run the scrub there. The problem is that if you intend to > recreate your current pool in a RAIDZ layout you'll need to back up your > data, and if you back up your data using rsync (as you have been) and > then restore it to the new pool using rsync, the checksums for the > previously good files will be lost and the corrupted files will be given > new checksums. ZFS won't realize they're corrupted. Bear in mind, > though, that none of this is to say that any of your files currently are > corrupted or will be corrupted. This is just a "best approach to > worst case" as I see it. > >> I was/am already thinking along those lines, w/ 1 complication. I have >> another box (NetBSD 6.1.5) w/ a RAID5 that I wound up building w/ >> mis-aligned disk/RAID blocks in spite of a fair amount of effort to >> avoid that. I/O writes are horrible, 15-20 MB/s. My understanding is >> that RAIDZn is like RAID5 in many ways & that you always want 2^n+1 >> (3,5,9, ...) drives in a RAID5 to mitigate those misalignments, >> presumably in a RAIDZ also. Is that so w/ RAIDZ as well ? If so, I lose >> more than a small amount of total storage, which is why I went as I did >> when I built the box whenever that was. > I don't have enough knowledge/experience with RAIDZ to answer your > specific questions, but if nothing else you could still combine the disks > into mirrored vdevs, which are more flexible than RAIDZ, but slightly > less robust. You'd have a maximum of half the storage space and more > redundancy than you do now (though significantly less redundancy than > with a RAIDZ setup). > > When you say mirrored vdevs, are you alluding to a RAID10-ish setup ? My zpool man pages says that's a nogo for me (FreeBSD 9.3R), maybe for newer .... My various boxen do a fair amount of stuff overnight, automated. I will try the 'zpool scrub' tomorrow during the day with the machine deliberately lightly loaded. -- William A. Mahaffey III ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war ever devised by man." -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Aug 4 04:16:21 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7259EBAC946 for ; Thu, 4 Aug 2016 04:16:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ultima1252@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yb0-x233.google.com (mail-yb0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c09::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2507B1644 for ; Thu, 4 Aug 2016 04:16:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ultima1252@gmail.com) Received: by mail-yb0-x233.google.com with SMTP id v8so1969041ybe.3 for ; Wed, 03 Aug 2016 21:16:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=fhYTRi7Aby0UghtROfIIYmW7Ur9qwfBpMTWvH2M4a7I=; b=jzJscMoyE5ErdbxMFduaJfTlBeKAKYTlXz7LWL8RvR3RpZk3z0453gdfioS4GLHgya gruozDfbDQgdL6twb+63kVKCPW/X7ZE0WsrennxytKtQr1uSBWySS3BO7q0Be0/umu1b Y8/dzwdJT9kpjVcQ00QO5vRsRobE+lptSyF3QWYjY80fsGssBGK9iimkYm563TweRcDv UJg7Ax3tuf/g5VORUT8gbYly0zJBsOCxamocJ99xRhFLgW7mQ1922iA6AZqASPy8lBoa iEajUc4SsLZA6+DprfuWE7oV0wcLVVZfBkz++ulgZgfU3ewtwrohegeRQw0Un4Rr7KQU wg5g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=fhYTRi7Aby0UghtROfIIYmW7Ur9qwfBpMTWvH2M4a7I=; b=ZIr7QpcAuXyFT+pxtk+AmMWIi1xHpk9eZlVJOUxEz6DZVrbI/CKVsUl75Mm4GHOWmP 26GSd4YWSxx2rcaIqYMzHuS3YzIpNuiqH0oMF36eq6m8umnNHCRA/ABsqkNyzONWNmab x7txrd51hB6jNyTXKqy9ysXysTSGEufZFA9bRHCbWfSUkaWMuI0lfum9BqzdWRkJ5Yl/ Bt38iFMLsKHRPG6hOxhKCz8xIABIlAfkmg1zDXh7ibBzbqBfQIW34GvNI6LMrhEVfcDK vZufgWXSHvbLIyTpgtN3zDsczivp6dB0o+A290LI/RbDtJXFZehAbteYIVqvJZDdrpyj B6Hg== X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoouuT1apnP6vGP3Y+phATv3nrPPYWDWhrGjLZWr6xVvE8dCFQCvTyvawPoMlQzgkppuRWUxoLcfV4HWPcgQ== X-Received: by 10.37.201.131 with SMTP id z125mr50318335ybf.183.1470284180151; Wed, 03 Aug 2016 21:16:20 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.129.51.150 with HTTP; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 21:16:19 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20160803202131.GA3082@mordor.lan> References: <20160803202131.GA3082@mordor.lan> From: Ultima Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2016 00:16:19 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: shrink zfs root zpool To: Julien Cigar Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2016 04:16:21 -0000 Assuming you have done this before and understand everything well enough, yes this would work and how I'v have done it in the past. Once you get the process down, the usb drive will just be a backup and only a reboot would be required. Also, a zpool labelclear maybe required on the disk you're resizing. Of course I'm sure you already understand this, there is also the period of possible dataloss due to no redundancy. Because of this, I would also suggest making backup, and also just in case a mistake is made to avoid any possible chance of disaster. Best of luck, Ultima From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Aug 4 04:24:16 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CE40BACB56 for ; Thu, 4 Aug 2016 04:24:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dpchrist@holgerdanske.com) Received: from holgerdanske.com (holgerdanske.com [184.105.128.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.he.net", Issuer "GeoTrust SSL CA - G4" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3DCBF19E0 for ; Thu, 4 Aug 2016 04:24:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dpchrist@holgerdanske.com) Received: from ::ffff:99.100.19.101 ([99.100.19.101]) by holgerdanske.com for ; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 21:24:05 -0700 Subject: Re: Ominous smartd messages .... To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <9ea1dbaf-6151-edc8-9e2a-430abe757472@holgerdanske.com> From: David Christensen X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110 Message-ID: <3a9a139d-c525-0c82-5e49-8d15f69f1e3f@holgerdanske.com> Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2016 21:24:05 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2016 04:24:16 -0000 On 08/03/2016 05:42 AM, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: > No separate HBA, 8 SATA3 slots on the mbd. Definitely hope that's *NOT* > the problem :-/ .... Agreed, but bear in mind that it is a possibility if you exhaust the other possibilities and problems persist. > No separate system drive, ZFS root as per wiki. I find it useful to have my O/S on a small, fast, dedicated drive. I got lucky, and bought a used 16 GB SSD on Amazon for $10. I installed FreeBSD 10.1 on that with encrypted ZFS root using the installer, and then dd'd the image to a chosen HDD. It might be possible to install Windows onto an external HDD/SSD. Note that you can install Windows and play with it for 30 days without activating. If you can't test the 8 @ 1 TB HDD's in-place, then you'll need to move them into a Windows machine with HGST Windows Drive Fitness Test (WinDFT). Make sure that you record HBA port number, cable serial number (I number mine with Sharpie), and drive serial number as you pull the drives, so you can restore things exactly after testing. In the Windows machine, make sure to connect to an HBA, not a USB, Firewire, eSATA, or other external docking bay. Test each drive with its matching cable. > [HGST Windows Drive Fitness Test (WinDFT)] sounds > destructive, right ? Any other options short of that ? Thanks & TIA .... Manufacturer diagnostic utility disks usually include tests that don't modify the on-disk data. But, some include a utility to wipe (HDD) or Secure Delete (SSD) the disk; which would definitely be destructive to your data. In any case, make sure you have backups. David From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Aug 4 04:49:29 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59FB2BAD0D8 for ; Thu, 4 Aug 2016 04:49:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dpchrist@holgerdanske.com) Received: from holgerdanske.com (holgerdanske.com [184.105.128.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.he.net", Issuer "GeoTrust SSL CA - G4" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B28F1353 for ; Thu, 4 Aug 2016 04:49:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dpchrist@holgerdanske.com) Received: from ::ffff:99.100.19.101 ([99.100.19.101]) by holgerdanske.com for ; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 21:49:26 -0700 Subject: Re: Ominous smartd messages .... To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <020caa94-b329-d5a6-5bd4-bfcc575c039f@freebsd.org> <4b35b969-606b-9084-5ce3-688eddfc5e70@FreeBSD.org> From: David Christensen X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110 Message-ID: <92733556-2fb1-08dc-ac7a-c54d0247c7ae@holgerdanske.com> Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2016 21:49:26 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2016 04:49:29 -0000 On 08/03/2016 01:27 PM, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: > Can I do that 'zpool scrub' live ? I try to scrub when the machine is not in use. > No spare SATA slots :-/ .... How about expansion slots -- e.g. PCI, PCIe? > On 08/03/16 15:19, Matthew Seaman wrote: >> Also, the fact that you have how ever many terabytes of data with no >> resilience just makes me feel on edge -- and it's not even my data. +1 >> Strongly recommend rebuilding your zpool as a RAIDZ of 8 drives -- yes, >> you'll end up with less usable space, but you and your data will survive >> failure of a drive and a 'zpool scrub' will be able to fix things even >> if a bad spot on one drive has scrambled some of your data. > > I was/am already thinking along those lines, w/ 1 complication. I have > another box (NetBSD 6.1.5) w/ a RAID5 that I wound up building w/ > mis-aligned disk/RAID blocks in spite of a fair amount of effort to > avoid that. I/O writes are horrible, 15-20 MB/s. My understanding is > that RAIDZn is like RAID5 in many ways & that you always want 2^n+1 > (3,5,9, ...) drives in a RAID5 to mitigate those misalignments, > presumably in a RAIDZ also. Is that so w/ RAIDZ as well ? If so, I lose > more than a small amount of total storage, which is why I went as I did > when I built the box whenever that was. How much data do you have on the 8 @ 1 TB machine? How are you doing backups? Archives? Images? How much data are you willing to lose? What is your usage environment -- e.g. student/ hobbyist, SOHO, SMB, large corporate? What are your budget and schedule? David From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Aug 4 05:14:37 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07CE6BAD7DC for ; Thu, 4 Aug 2016 05:14:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jkent3rd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qk0-x242.google.com (mail-qk0-x242.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::242]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B990612EE for ; Thu, 4 Aug 2016 05:14:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jkent3rd@gmail.com) Received: by mail-qk0-x242.google.com with SMTP id q62so18623330qkf.2 for ; Wed, 03 Aug 2016 22:14:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=2NC+tevLc8/Mv2S9vuqHKTNlyN+wQxva/azBlD79vZU=; b=ifMI0RLLfvh/tZp39dSU16y0Py7d+5i8FLpM3Gzn9/CVT+xgOj4gavJue8vENbxTrI 6aDeQa0SeblrvtNzURlKhu2aPWWwycKCxqLbp+paI6iI/T3jpdScpoQd2MBpEFEycd4q yGuhEAiOJRmDAExG1b5cBqPa6Q+Pdw8Wj1dCERS3F5ZHjmW7gxEkumN4/ZDDFmz+xgME 1QFDwQuXVo6QdiakavktvmPaBbTDHrMK3uTNPRaMz/kGHto2iW00OIx8pcquYfAdZQET sHXa/f9Wd0s5BZ4aLRR+GmOPrGBKAYwrVnwMEemDb5mTRnXg4ngGm1U2NCHrMqjMxAF7 Z0GA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=2NC+tevLc8/Mv2S9vuqHKTNlyN+wQxva/azBlD79vZU=; b=gpFdzBb9+6tpttj2ewXLA0QZPvdd2HhbXTLgVDUCgp+RlfZ2blbzW7z4lxbkVXO8DD rjCdM7q1dD7cbU6nP02U2S5EVlCX8LmYiZQq0vj7IkpeH9qERtjq4u7PpIyVBUcWKpI0 DLvAp3SiJAdjKeOFxU02FvMRGI1jL+tMmk+l5jvsqwETFszRsd1YPCWz0AHVFtQxTFMz LnQGe7nwq/fMijn/CtBdScZ4qwfI4RCTJNEnh0avaEqtP28jCKHZaJMehhFEEw1ESB/C ng50854JtA9HR7FeLmiwTz/PDOtI0euDPeZWr/bblGsIfnuznYVt2lVXfxB5Ltqn6ttN GOwg== X-Gm-Message-State: AEkooutqRktEyIX06prYBS0pc1UDoJoL92i29xW6j4+e8LZ9pduSaw1rHXVcJWUpvaclGRINcwARhFIgdeZljg== X-Received: by 10.55.142.66 with SMTP id q63mr4170559qkd.1.1470287675439; Wed, 03 Aug 2016 22:14:35 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.55.94.196 with HTTP; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 22:14:35 -0700 (PDT) From: John Kent Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2016 01:14:35 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Strange Problem with pkg To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2016 05:14:37 -0000 I've been trying to perform some pkg upgrades. 'pkg update' completes with no issues. 'pkg update -f' completes with no issues. 'pkg upgrade' aborts however with an assertion failure: Assertion failed: (strcmp(uid, p->uid) != 0), function pkg_conflicts_check_local_path, file pkg_jobs_conflicts.c, line 399. I've captured the output of 'pkg upgrade -f' to get the list of packages that are to be upgraded and performed the upgrades manually on each package and can now identify (python27) the package that bombs. But I don't have an idea of what to try next. Any ideas? Regards, John From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Aug 4 05:44:50 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96117BAE205 for ; Thu, 4 Aug 2016 05:44:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from woodsb02@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yb0-x22c.google.com (mail-yb0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c09::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 533C5118A for ; Thu, 4 Aug 2016 05:44:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from woodsb02@gmail.com) Received: by mail-yb0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id v8so2357324ybe.3 for ; Wed, 03 Aug 2016 22:44:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=wzT0UTehjm1yIzTH5KHv9Ra+OWJY9wKxwvg5h6V+III=; b=ndSaF+DroqAfV/uv4ISCirpDa6BywzrNGHJIp/MuFrM491B3xuARtnG6aRNiwObaNN bO0CrTn2YSepDSuQc5/MkSKsDvQ3iX1BRgNJBBPTtgYXSksv6zF84enoaYPoL5auZtgP wNBmnG1G0DmWxk2mA1NM6syDcx9Qhrp2YmUvdZOix4mLTh7iE86WHv9Q/DKIsjd5uNt6 iXMOSfeubGbAr4Hav9FyZIAYw8+ZKzVLMKf2/9BqbxvYuIeVmhhsSHLM5QbIfFKf/QFU 1S7m/mcEwzvwhwx1/ULuqM9TYpFmweMoc5HDof17sQa+K4EHN/n/dDdiOK55hGHC4amo GnVg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=wzT0UTehjm1yIzTH5KHv9Ra+OWJY9wKxwvg5h6V+III=; b=IyJVN1v7z0oO2jD/L711FZGAGrG2mVsVcRS56XbYP9tyoyU53lxry5MW8HG4XSozYy LEnHHIV2UDetKpi4FBz9QGLgZT+UuANlYszMMAwkCZ7fp2ub4ONg02yMbMPa8PukbkQV Ty8nYPOt9XK09cTGswnGzkQT+pWnDdvePfvnam8Jz8/qPfIJY5KxN4IMNpBUKL/37BvY Asiazh+m9weNnW99cOsjP9OZBmdMzRyRf72GUtT7eUk/4d7nhKAravElDPWbiBIrp9kO pINiV5Kjnc5ET+K5pvSehM/fukhsy3gLZUeto2Vl6r2ccCyqz2villjNxYwB2H2O+0FK UHWg== X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoous8z3P5jeEf8WjtG76qjpd2CpCJUmOnKXLuDNO/1pzo0x09zi3xtjawMb7Z8JnzDqLc0f9zLKZmDRUeiA== X-Received: by 10.37.101.5 with SMTP id z5mr54506678ybb.65.1470289489443; Wed, 03 Aug 2016 22:44:49 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.37.199.65 with HTTP; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 22:44:48 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <201608022211.u72MBIxR079329@mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk> From: Ben Woods Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2016 13:44:48 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: wireless hints: AP, username, password - does not work To: Warren Block Cc: "mexas@bris.ac.uk" , "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2016 05:44:50 -0000 On 4 August 2016 at 07:47, Warren Block wrote: > On Wed, 3 Aug 2016, Ben Woods wrote: > > On FreeBSD, it is as you said. Assuming you have atheros, put the following >> in your /etc/rc.conf (replacing your_ssid_here with the wifi SSID): >> >> wlans_ath0="wlan0" >> ifconfig_wlan0="ssid *your_ssid_here* DHCP" >> >> >> Run: >> # service netif restart >> >> Once you are connected and have an IP address, open your browser and >> navigate to any webpage which DOESNT USE HTTPS. I commonly use >> www.distrowatch.com, but any others you know which don't use https will >> work. This is the part that tricks many people, as the captive portal will >> redirect all web traffic to the portal until authenticated, but https >> traffic will detect the server is not who they are supposed to be and >> fail. >> >> Once authenticated, you should get a connection. Note that if can be >> easier >> to connect with a mobile phone to confirm how it should work, and what the >> SSID is etc, and then replicate on your FreeBSD laptop. >> > > This can be done in /etc/wpa_supplicant.conf with just: > > network={ > ssid="horriblecaptiveportal" > key_mgmt="NONE" > } > > Then it is not necessary to change /etc/rc.conf. > TIL - thanks! Is it in the handbook!? :) -- From: Benjamin Woods woodsb02@gmail.com From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Aug 4 07:49:00 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D786BAE425 for ; Thu, 4 Aug 2016 07:49:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wodfer@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wm0-x22b.google.com (mail-wm0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CD5C11A84 for ; Thu, 4 Aug 2016 07:48:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wodfer@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wm0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id f65so474313719wmi.0 for ; Thu, 04 Aug 2016 00:48:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=9HPhXv50eiRL+CODUtOruvWx3IOAWn530000E9qQIqg=; b=OT/nxkvlJVQwgf85PQCERH+Z/VsaktmYub5mREW7GLCHhgzWFybGPGiIxE1cPiNnP9 FRT8HNhCcvSFEh2L6LjB0YyYgTS/tye5XsrGwXoxLTvzts4T6I21XNB51ZP4xryAVzFn pR/jmEMgynr4tM29+/+bmSTC8v9+LtNgGdzbJyG+3mWw9rHKdZmFi+S8Txr3QR4MMobU cQ/TJLY5yODsYaYK+V/372N4ahiVtMlukpdD+rQYdEynUUpuW1B3HoIlnw8NjYBOgfRc dsrs3NQBR9XJ4eHb+bIUpvvXaRfgZw6Sy/VWuBzd9rSFHhhCSaX3Fr27nUe3+XTb2+QY JLyA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=9HPhXv50eiRL+CODUtOruvWx3IOAWn530000E9qQIqg=; b=F1M4XGy5vNvn3OInm4auWg8TJomE9MrGUtLP2YWCdNZA6C8MzQ0tfBx+B3PTpC8jGf peliDvbFCdTGZmXX+Dkrf2LMq2woE+wsj7U8OanqDftapnfZX5FVNtxqWI/IjREBkv7Q 5RqxonY/74fzfeBXLO1btTrvuqC+GG3QoWWO68L5H4vz7S6WiZLuN4/p8PaTESlGYXXE zoHvwi2H3x8do/AQmfVAe8Pum3OBgD5s3rO1TMhtdvqk55Jt+DJqrRLgxgRQ/I/dFICr AbkwDnLA/TuWhrz42U7Es6h0dwCq3y4Te8eUkAAGbsO4dY0YklE8VVmsmjB4Fm/OtC5X gMPA== X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoouuh/aJa9MNNaBUwoYQCoEXn0kSICLDssLrePybHa6+iEWczYYc/TUn5Y0USdrbCvHdp653cAZp325p7PQ== X-Received: by 10.194.18.35 with SMTP id t3mr64588987wjd.174.1470296938277; Thu, 04 Aug 2016 00:48:58 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.28.165.150 with HTTP; Thu, 4 Aug 2016 00:48:57 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20160421171200.GA967@SeanLaptop> From: Andy Wodfer Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2016 09:48:57 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: php7 and pecl-pdflib fails To: Sean DuBois Cc: freebsd-questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2016 07:49:00 -0000 Hi Sean and the rest of the FreeBSD list, Today I stumbled upon this issue again. I needed to install php7 with the pdf extension to be able to create PDF files from a form generator. Still, I see the pecl-pdflib hasn't been updated for a long time and not compatible with php7. Any chance you or someone else could look into this? I think it makes no sense to have a list of build options for php70-extensions where some are not compatible with php7. :-) Also the ability to create PDF files through php is for several of our sites very important. I'm not the only one I think who needs this functionality. Would appreciate any feedback. Btw: Is there any way around this for me? Downgrading php is unfortunately not an option on this server. Are people using some other solution for this? Cheers, Andy On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 3:14 PM, Andy Wodfer wrote: > Hi Sean, > > I skipped it in the install here, so I don't really need it for now, but > there are probably others who do so if you're up for it - go for it! :-) > > Best, > Andy > > On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 7:12 PM, Sean DuBois wrote: > >> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 04:21:54PM +0200, Andy Wodfer wrote: >> > Hi, >> > I recently upgraded to 10.3 REL on a test server. I'm trying to install >> all >> > the latest versions for Apache, mysql, php and so on. >> > >> > php7 is installed and works perfectly with apache. However, I couldn't >> > install the extension pecl-pdflib from the php7 extensions port, it >> fails >> > with the message doesn't supprt php7. >> > >> > ===> phpMyAdmin-4.6.0 depends on file: >> > /usr/local/lib/php/20151012/openssl.so - found >> > ===> Returning to build of phpMyAdmin-4.6.0 >> > ===> phpMyAdmin-4.6.0 depends on file: /usr/local/lib/php/20151012/ >> pdf.so >> > - not found >> > ===> pecl-pdflib-3.0.4 cannot be installed: doesn't work with >> lang/php70 >> > port (doesn't support PHP 70). >> > *** Error code 1 >> > >> > Stop. >> > make[2]: stopped in /usr/ports/print/pecl-pdflib >> > *** Error code 1 >> > >> > Stop. >> > make[1]: stopped in /usr/ports/databases/phpmyadmin >> > *** Error code 1 >> > >> > Stop. >> > make: stopped in /usr/ports/databases/phpmyadmin >> > >> > Does this mean I can't install phpmyadmin for now or is there a way >> around >> > this? pecl-pdflib hasn't been updated for a couple of years it seems.. >> > >> > Anyone? >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Andy >> >> Hi Andy! >> >> I do php-src/extension development[0] and would love to port pecl-pdflib >> to PHP 7 if you need it/can confirm everything works. >> >> thanks >> >> [0] http://pecl.php.net/user/seander >> > > From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Aug 4 11:42:17 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59493BAE4D7 for ; Thu, 4 Aug 2016 11:42:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rodperson@rodperson.com) Received: from www3.webmail.pair.com (www3.webmail.pair.com [66.39.3.34]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3534D1606 for ; Thu, 4 Aug 2016 11:42:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rodperson@rodperson.com) Received: from rc.webmail.pair.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by www3.webmail.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 073B93E24C4 for ; Thu, 4 Aug 2016 07:33:42 -0400 (EDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2016 07:33:42 -0400 From: Rod To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Conkeror/libxul error Reply-To: rodperson@rodperson.com Mail-Reply-To: rodperson@rodperson.com Message-ID: <55f8622617b8be1d4b7f8b8fecc6d56d@rodperson.com> X-Sender: rodperson@rodperson.com User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.1.4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2016 11:42:17 -0000 Hello all, I updated my ports over the weekend (portsnap fetch update) and rebuild all ports that needed updating. Since then conkeror will not run. I have tried to deleting the conkeror profile directory, updating my ports daily since then to see if any changes to libxul or conkeror have been committed - when they have new builds don't fix the issue. I even tried installing both from packages, still get the same error. Here is the error if anyone can give me an hint as to what to do. I have found references to the error on Linux lists but they are all at least 6 months out and none of those resolutions worked for me. Thanks, Rod $ conkeror JavaScript strict warning: resource://gre/components/TelemetryStartup.js, line 42: ReferenceError: reference to undefined property Cc['@mozilla.org/toolkit/crash-reporter;1'] JavaScript warning: file:///usr/local/share/conkeror/components/application.js, line 224: flags argument of String.prototype.{searc h,match,replace} is deprecated JavaScript strict warning: chrome://conkeror/content/keywords.js, line 20: SyntaxError: in strict mode code, functions may be decla red only at top level or immediately within another function JavaScript strict warning: chrome://conkeror/content/keywords.js, line 30: SyntaxError: in strict mode code, functions may be decla red only at top level or immediately within another function JavaScript strict warning: chrome://conkeror/content/keywords.js, line 62: SyntaxError: in strict mode code, functions may be decla red only at top level or immediately within another function JavaScript strict warning: chrome://conkeror/content/keywords.js, line 68: SyntaxError: in strict mode code, functions may be decla red only at top level or immediately within another function JavaScript strict warning: chrome://conkeror/content/keywords.js, line 72: SyntaxError: in strict mode code, functions may be decla red only at top level or immediately within another function JavaScript warning: chrome://conkeror/content/coroutine.js, line 354: mutating the [[Prototype]] of an object will cause your code to run very slowly; instead create the object with the correct initial [[Prototype]] value using Object.create Error initializing. SyntaxError: missing ; before statement chrome://conkeror/content/debug.js:87 load1@file:///usr/local/share/conkeror/components/application.js:108:17 application.prototype.load@file:///usr/local/share/conkeror/components/application.js:160:25 application.prototype.require@file:///usr/local/share/conkeror/components/application.js:230:13 @chrome://conkeror/content/conkeror.js:14:1 load1@file:///usr/local/share/conkeror/components/application.js:108:17 application.prototype.load@file:///usr/local/share/conkeror/components/application.js:160:25 application.prototype.require@file:///usr/local/share/conkeror/components/application.js:230:13 application@file:///usr/local/share/conkeror/components/application.js:40:9 XPCOMUtils__getFactory/factory.createInstance@resource://gre/modules/XPCOMUtils.jsm:326:19 cmdline.prototype.handle@file:///usr/local/share/conkeror/components/command-line.js:20:24 JavaScript error: file:///usr/local/share/conkeror/components/command-line.js, line 23: TypeError: conkeror.handle_command_line is not a function JavaScript strict warning: resource://gre/modules/TelemetryEnvironment.jsm, line 488: ReferenceError: reference to undefined proper ty this._environment._currentEnvironment.addons $ From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Aug 4 14:59:05 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E407BAFB4D for ; Thu, 4 Aug 2016 14:59:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "wonkity.com", Issuer "wonkity.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C13C6168C for ; Thu, 4 Aug 2016 14:59:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id u74Ex2C5051362 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 4 Aug 2016 08:59:02 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) with ESMTP id u74Ex1uC051359; Thu, 4 Aug 2016 08:59:01 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2016 08:59:01 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Ben Woods cc: "mexas@bris.ac.uk" , "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: wireless hints: AP, username, password - does not work In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <201608022211.u72MBIxR079329@mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (BSF 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Thu, 04 Aug 2016 08:59:02 -0600 (MDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2016 14:59:05 -0000 On Thu, 4 Aug 2016, Ben Woods wrote: > On 4 August 2016 at 07:47, Warren Block wrote: > On Wed, 3 Aug 2016, Ben Woods wrote: > > On FreeBSD, it is as you said. Assuming you have atheros, put the following > in your /etc/rc.conf (replacing your_ssid_here with the wifi SSID): > > wlans_ath0="wlan0" > ifconfig_wlan0="ssid *your_ssid_here* DHCP" > > > Run: > # service netif restart > > Once you are connected and have an IP address, open your browser and > navigate to any webpage which DOESNT USE HTTPS. I commonly use > www.distrowatch.com, but any others you know which don't use https will > work. This is the part that tricks many people, as the captive portal will > redirect all web traffic to the portal until authenticated, but https > traffic will detect the server is not who they are supposed to be and fail. > > Once authenticated, you should get a connection. Note that if can be easier > to connect with a mobile phone to confirm how it should work, and what the > SSID is etc, and then replicate on your FreeBSD laptop. > > > This can be done in /etc/wpa_supplicant.conf with just: > >   network={ >           ssid="horriblecaptiveportal" >           key_mgmt="NONE" >   } > > Then it is not necessary to change /etc/rc.conf. > > > TIL - thanks! Is it in the handbook!? :) It's shown in passing in the WEP section: https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/network-wireless.html#network-wireless-wep WEP is sadly, still in use in the wild, so we can't repurpose that section and stop mentioning it. The whole wireless section badly needs a rewrite and reorganization. It occurs to me that we need a "WiFi for Travel" section after the quick start. That would have sections on how to deal with identifying which obsolete, insecure protocol is being used and configuring the system to use it. I will add that to my ever-growing list of doc things that need to be done. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Aug 4 15:33:55 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B576BAF478 for ; Thu, 4 Aug 2016 15:33:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from mail-wm0-x234.google.com (mail-wm0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1732A1275 for ; Thu, 4 Aug 2016 15:33:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: by mail-wm0-x234.google.com with SMTP id o80so383290499wme.1 for ; Thu, 04 Aug 2016 08:33:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bris-ac-uk.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:message-id:to:subject:cc:reply-to:in-reply-to; bh=4hycqthUBGLpkgcTPky2+9U1NJPd5L1vP2ARZ1MVbOo=; b=F24bax7wS1lKOk/DHV2c4SHtgyqqhamBK1q3eovtNav9NWthQwqpN7pcYQnkLhZCNi S/wKQXyGjsemKppd62pF5kcr5FA6rNV3lhVryCL/SzOSAKPKJbtXZJvGW9OP6hd7CNhh 7lmn4R9gci7tA+26BDSASEkKbcs+403ieDgF8JwyHcs2DCobphplF1WgIZ49/lc7hz/z rjn66QN6IiQwsVRPT1zC4ZuxZ96a7XI0R4a4/97bAYCJWGtEiVWhLXinvSMHrAU9swE9 n+GdFaJYpqXM0uDAOFuxXC2rnFu6tQ+wTAdFkfvYnZEZKZWjYaNU9xQwcMnAQgmUBC7/ UJjQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:message-id:to:subject:cc:reply-to :in-reply-to; bh=4hycqthUBGLpkgcTPky2+9U1NJPd5L1vP2ARZ1MVbOo=; b=eJ1q8hEdarFLWlk9ENEGtdIjHegg2BktFAbKe+vEx7eWNTaUl0HbZtrF8B3d3FhcKq BJrfGZa7Fv8GX+W8+jRHfGF355tL7+h7e1LyupbFZWgZ6Y/3qqY+E9MRGONqdeNVObCT JTAPNQwmai2gnmi9LoR0MXZNl6sJ/F8fVlJYsogmxC81eGyXnMxxU8ZkqfvRJBdyTo2u TxlJxELx69IzsTv9dkQQoKfXZ/hLpJ1HmOGFnGccQlCrccmWvUBd1hJOCBK4QHfOXPhk xQk2IkiBphpRZ+DNm8qfwfgXhRu+oW92IbRfFIEsvYwEgtBAysa0z5fBiP2u49EuktZ4 FFUQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AEkooutFLO3xJbXhK5H3RRPlfkHu4MEqCCoBipwb/9yPGJTGcO2roxNQH/T1sq8drUP9T7TM X-Received: by 10.28.166.1 with SMTP id p1mr54816385wme.85.1470324833088; Thu, 04 Aug 2016 08:33:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk (mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk. [137.222.170.4]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e10sm13388706wjc.21.2016.08.04.08.33.52 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 04 Aug 2016 08:33:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u74FXp7P087698; Thu, 4 Aug 2016 16:33:51 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mexas@mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id u74FXpDi087697; Thu, 4 Aug 2016 16:33:51 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mexas) Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2016 16:33:51 +0100 (BST) From: Anton Shterenlikht Message-Id: <201608041533.u74FXpDi087697@mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk> To: wblock@wonkity.com, woodsb02@gmail.com Subject: Re: wireless hints: AP, username, password - does not work Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, mexas@bris.ac.uk Reply-To: mexas@bris.ac.uk In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2016 15:33:55 -0000 >From wblock@wonkity.com Thu Aug 4 16:28:02 2016 >occurs to me that we need a "WiFi for Travel" section after the quick I'd appreciate such section very much! Anton From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Aug 4 15:55:51 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C38FBAF88A for ; Thu, 4 Aug 2016 15:55:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from sola.nimnet.asn.au (paqi.nimnet.asn.au [115.70.110.159]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0EED41C27 for ; Thu, 4 Aug 2016 15:55:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sola.nimnet.asn.au (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id u74Ftjjw002818; Fri, 5 Aug 2016 01:55:45 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2016 01:55:44 +1000 (EST) From: Ian Smith To: Matthias Apitz cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: no beep any more (SOLVED) In-Reply-To: <20160802182544.GA2254@c720-r292778-amd64> Message-ID: <20160805014424.E56585@sola.nimnet.asn.au> References: <20160728223053.A29054@sola.nimnet.asn.au> <20160728142521.GA1932@c720-r292778-amd64> <20160802053623.GA2187@c720-r292778-amd64> <20160802144630.GA2366@c720-r292778-amd64.oa.oclc.org> <20160803013156.V56585@sola.nimnet.asn.au> <20160802182544.GA2254@c720-r292778-amd64> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2016 15:55:51 -0000 On Tue, 2 Aug 2016 20:25:44 +0200, Matthias Apitz wrote: > El día Wednesday, August 03, 2016 a las 01:59:41AM +1000, Ian Smith escribió: > > > Two questions: Do values apart than 50 provide different beep volumes, > > or is it off/on? > > You can use any value between 0...100; 50 is to awake all your > colleagues in the office from their dreams, 10 is fine for just noting > that you did something wrong in vim or shell; Cool. > > And does 'kldload speaker ; spkrtest' work with it? > > with 'kldload speaker' (I compiled even a debug version to understand it) > you get a device /dev/speaker, controlled as well with 'igain' and one can play > tones with something like > > # echo CDEFGAB > /dev/speaker > > Thanks for supporting me in my persistence I do enjoy a mystery, though I spend way too much time chasing them. Perhaps you'd like to add an entry for your Chromebook on the Laptops section of the Wiki, so others might benefit from your pain? .. I also enjoyed your exchange with the forum guy .. you were being so non-provocative but disturbed someone's sense of exclusivity anyway. cheers, Ian From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Aug 4 16:23:34 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E9D6BAF0B3 for ; Thu, 4 Aug 2016 16:23:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alexmiroslav@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vk0-x234.google.com (mail-vk0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DEB141E86 for ; Thu, 4 Aug 2016 16:23:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alexmiroslav@gmail.com) Received: by mail-vk0-x234.google.com with SMTP id w127so172133167vkh.2 for ; Thu, 04 Aug 2016 09:23:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=K2fyRy98fdhZSQgAUlPTUspqpPimX1vxphR78HviD4k=; b=U9QGlfojKdWFMOU+GmLiXK8evQ1WpP7JbidvbuTu14xJAd+McJFBlTMRe9kh+jhk4P H/gievoQEQDtyfXUot8XMooM7I60mBZMACsHxGydFlxvqqVZgQdd8wYrBXh98TWilNO4 /wM7z3xeGpQm+cRYuu+lBCerSrX/1VEZeDxxMNx6naWdmsEynoaL6XGshnN/GLrO3rL7 ZLiONKD+qN6xRok1VIbpuM2KrL8lFPaSbxBV+84SQBTFxzizv/JoO1kSFr9S2CL5lVbK XTy+P89RXmOXFMKf91OgZuMap+nSZiJHE//PIa4pW0SQRpYin3SJQnRMwffbIOmm7lFa 3+Dw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=K2fyRy98fdhZSQgAUlPTUspqpPimX1vxphR78HviD4k=; b=VVAcRkSXYkaRRF6+ARmGbCEUfvERrb/hX+mjObJnzwRikcl/Fdpg1WtKzvS49ST6If 4s1tNRL7/d9s3A7wWUHxaUfGFh1bwSxJSFkPx+/ozJURdgne/B7V43syWVDyQq0JlD43 Wz4Jdh+mx3mBMRtGWVbEJWTRYVfhHt/UV4w55+30gcR1yVlCCzjrTD02eV4ySOPJQ273 u0bR7eWDNzVJ+N8MZA2RwPvHiDvauds2ZiqtJCRwgvM3dyrdm6ehB5VQuBv3YT7fuXm6 VxSjJ5ObGkxvKberJQKcwOm/OxG0CSnrHkwBoQ53mmgN8XVQIute7jaj4gYtR5VzxZ7M VSJA== X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoous3Ama4DtIF5pTShbFUlz7cenZw72iemyyzyitWfYCWL13AlmY6AmRYjYTGtKYxlNCpPh13aoADbMtzLQ== X-Received: by 10.31.248.5 with SMTP id w5mr36501944vkh.142.1470327811738; Thu, 04 Aug 2016 09:23:31 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.176.2.193 with HTTP; Thu, 4 Aug 2016 09:23:31 -0700 (PDT) From: Aleksandr Miroslav Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2016 09:23:31 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: tiff vulnerability in ports? To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2016 16:23:34 -0000 This is perhaps a question for the tiff devs more than anything, but I noticed that pkg audit has been complaining about libtiff (graphics/tiff) for some time now. FreeBSD's VUXML database says anything before 4.0.7 is affected, but apparently that version hasn't been released yet (according to http://www.remotesensing.org/libtiff/, the latest stable release is still 4.0.6). Anyone know what's going on? Is there a release upcoming to fix this? Thanks, Alex From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Aug 4 17:39:40 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35594BAD367 for ; Thu, 4 Aug 2016 17:39:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from josefina.johnson@excelhubtech.biz) Received: from mail-pa0-x22c.google.com (mail-pa0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E4921D50 for ; Thu, 4 Aug 2016 17:39:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from josefina.johnson@excelhubtech.biz) Received: by mail-pa0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id iw10so84577720pac.2 for ; Thu, 04 Aug 2016 10:39:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=excelhubtech-biz.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:to:from:subject:message-id:mime-version; bh=CCRlqMet4KNyIpDepJRzDTICL7AgUFTgVmR4yq8OZHs=; b=BUJKRvVUVus9i5RHP2sFdWWvi/wKDc74N8WXRLB2iZsMY82dd8g5+7kcxn5c6r+/Dy RC5THZ7W7+grzsYnKax3ESWUicfSw9JVWkwr9izBtedLi64DNAaJph7chzW3gtPBzihE BpYF6JCDIFKZy6OLaWihKIdg8fg79GzvJCAT3kj2AZHa4zbmdhyFXpuMreH3DEr7/8LI zqKN4qOzQuUpUp39vKRlfHfkHXG9C0uhbvgcr8EqRuIDsSzQ1ZktQA4UhkYQBHKwBvuO OzzM2SSu69Sifp9F/IUSh5t6rHjKXFQbzvr29Z0hcmejnRICWm2qMwvRynQQXl4gaRyh aA5Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:to:from:subject:message-id:mime-version; bh=CCRlqMet4KNyIpDepJRzDTICL7AgUFTgVmR4yq8OZHs=; b=FsxCj9T1koTJQPhnkLfY9JPbvX4UHg7slvqItSyKyxyZLHpUYkpCnGGKTq4kTzjVro pa1lsfzhSZ9gNvG21eKdBB4fVvMdeKw3LXiaWvXtlEwDVM+yG1YJQJmS83PdYyh1VkUv 2m7cTXVRIszWg87yyz0qCnvacp4LkgsGZ0NeTeD8Ojavan6qUfCHCNpICQOS4gO1NRSl tqXejqibOtRy5y0BDZtZFHebifA6Kb+XpuHK12VMfeJoAa32S0EmcVeUBuBDOwGytVez F5Y/W2FMTCeoenkWH36HdtqCvnijnafhnUgzlSqDhrKENteMC3j8ocR/SKD6xakz1AKD sEaQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoouu+85a2MJuySlZwmkYxBb9NE3/FEUtEACAfC44WmDaCUXjfrfAKFXFOISZIdpqPcA== X-Received: by 10.67.13.196 with SMTP id fa4mr130054804pad.115.1470332378907; Thu, 04 Aug 2016 10:39:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from WIN-R3EUHGPGQ43 (ec2-52-34-128-219.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com. [52.34.128.219]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m5sm21916412paw.40.2016.08.04.10.39.36 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 04 Aug 2016 10:39:37 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2016 16:41:05 +0200 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Josefina Johnson Subject: Free Project Management Software Pricing Guide Message-ID: <854a434c03117c3fe3326134cd9a3ab7@WIN-R3EUHGPGQ43> X-Mailer: PHPMailer 5.2.15 (https://github.com/PHPMailer/PHPMailer) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2016 17:39:40 -0000 Free Project Management Software Pricing Guide =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 Compare Systems =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09 =09 =09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09Increase workflow efficiency and project vi= sibility =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09Create a single point of access for all rel= evant information =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09Identify problem areas and maximize opportu= nities =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09 =09 =09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09One Minute Could Save You Days of Frustration =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09With the multitude of project management softwar= e solutions available today, selecting the right system for your organizati= on can be challenging. Software Advice™ is a trusted resource for sof= tware buyers. We provide detailed reviews and research on thousands of soft= ware applications. =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 Get free price quotes and relevant recommendations on systems that match your exact needs! =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 Learn More =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09 =09 =09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09 =09 =09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09Other Offers Recommended For You =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09 =09 =09=09=09 =09=09 =09 =09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =20 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09The 10 Most Popular Project Management Sof= tware Products =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 Learn More =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =20 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09Compare Resource Management Software for = 2016 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 Get Pricing =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09 =09 =09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09You are receiving this email because you have re= gistered for a download, white paper, comparison guide,or have elected to r= eceive information or offers from Software Purchase Guide Inc. You're signed up as freebsd-questions@freebsd.org. =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09Our mailing address is: Software Purchase Guide = Inc, 501 Silverside Rd, STE 105, Wilmington, DE 19809, info@softwarepurcha= seguide.com =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09If you do not want to receive any emails from So= ftware Purchase Guide Inc unsubscribe here From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Aug 5 12:55:10 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B6ABBB0C55 for ; Fri, 5 Aug 2016 12:55:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alphachi@mediaspirit.org) Received: from mail-ua0-x22b.google.com (mail-ua0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c08::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 302F11934 for ; Fri, 5 Aug 2016 12:55:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alphachi@mediaspirit.org) Received: by mail-ua0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id j59so196567060uaj.3 for ; Fri, 05 Aug 2016 05:55:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mediaspirit-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=IDfps4Zf6FG3nGwotQ7HxFTarDNqZ+uuYPpB6iod72E=; b=Y+HUg0p/N9qr3o9X3GHT94lVzlhgnX9o4cjUvl2ih8BRVRH/wZMkjzwlqIXKZbMA1g ZppE0myxlisK9bK0c7At3rV3U4V81Tmms5kWoryIlrZHLwXNuhkx8wqKmxvjwrtHLAG2 eO9LFn/OIaqlQ0SCCRDe1iFMXjR1+HbStYwBe4BC1qdq15sWojRNU6UGciOi+YP4WhNp +IXCJxtTH3AFZ5Awm2IquF9fAYOT9tvK6Shqy9xqzXTqIbzP25E7mjCmQmhbs5XXBJAI uK42+dsiy4uWZYRyf076/vE/GarNpdGE/jFMKkX66FeWTVudQLgyS1x++BZ/Q3AGRmsa VRDw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=IDfps4Zf6FG3nGwotQ7HxFTarDNqZ+uuYPpB6iod72E=; b=WACARjFZPnw98gx1VvEIl86eR0huoN0W2HgrLE/7w2jfoE45fP5wTADhmHkSyfqJ0J 08JM74zago9KuoQgEewU5w61P9lTJegkRSznnCynmwphLL1x6yQ78NkPNXDrSSrN6Pyc uwqks6Ws7dF1KrujnwE2IRDxBKfJOMlt0twK/ReLFbrSQXkBD1DZolCdQakoRT6KVhng WDfiyr4ScG1ERhmzYkO7QQAGcfcah/FfFB8idJwFIayqYo0lm4O7gQqkfu5GNvIZhyO5 TWnk0ueSx+Zcw7HmuAKDSo8/7BeCll2pmwI0ONr1zPBVtXbNlH0UHxDdRLtjMkd9CoZn pbAg== X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoouv2Nw8yfDIM4fntdBCcmO2zgYXJKO2PS1FDFFHJg1RB3E1SLmnp9rbmvoJmUC6VBk3aPUHvRk8+qNPwEg== X-Received: by 10.159.34.98 with SMTP id 89mr39387494uad.35.1470401708031; Fri, 05 Aug 2016 05:55:08 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.31.77.7 with HTTP; Fri, 5 Aug 2016 05:55:07 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: alphachi Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2016 20:55:07 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: tiff vulnerability in ports? To: Aleksandr Miroslav Cc: "list: freebsd" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2016 12:55:10 -0000 Please see this link to get more information: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=revision&revision=418585 2016-08-05 0:23 GMT+08:00 Aleksandr Miroslav : > This is perhaps a question for the tiff devs more than anything, but I > noticed that pkg audit has been complaining about libtiff (graphics/tiff) > for some time now. > > FreeBSD's VUXML database says anything before 4.0.7 is affected, but > apparently that version hasn't been released yet (according to > http://www.remotesensing.org/libtiff/, the latest stable release is still > 4.0.6). > > Anyone know what's going on? Is there a release upcoming to fix this? > > Thanks, > Alex > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions- > unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- Paranoid in Sabbath ... From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Aug 5 13:36:13 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3602BAF56F; Fri, 5 Aug 2016 13:36:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.2.117.100]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk", Issuer "infracaninophile.co.uk" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42F701DDF; Fri, 5 Aug 2016 13:36:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from zero-gravitas.local (unknown [85.199.232.226]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F20108930; Fri, 5 Aug 2016 13:36:06 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk; dmarc=none header.from=FreeBSD.org Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/F20108930; dkim=none; dkim-atps=neutral Subject: Re: tiff vulnerability in ports? To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org References: From: Matthew Seaman Message-ID: <33ac70de-78b6-dc54-e81f-3153d0d721e4@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2016 14:35:44 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="F20QPLI27F5h47vCto5gbfMpNfcjS3xJx" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RDNS_NONE, SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2016 13:36:13 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --F20QPLI27F5h47vCto5gbfMpNfcjS3xJx Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="Qaiu2p9l05uCLgtgkW6PTwHU6U7i214s6" From: Matthew Seaman To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <33ac70de-78b6-dc54-e81f-3153d0d721e4@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: tiff vulnerability in ports? References: In-Reply-To: --Qaiu2p9l05uCLgtgkW6PTwHU6U7i214s6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2016/08/05 13:55, alphachi wrote: > Please see this link to get more information: >=20 > https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=3Drevision&revision=3D418585 >=20 > 2016-08-05 0:23 GMT+08:00 Aleksandr Miroslav : >=20 >> This is perhaps a question for the tiff devs more than anything, but I= >> noticed that pkg audit has been complaining about libtiff (graphics/ti= ff) >> for some time now. >> >> FreeBSD's VUXML database says anything before 4.0.7 is affected, but >> apparently that version hasn't been released yet (according to >> http://www.remotesensing.org/libtiff/, the latest stable release is st= ill >> 4.0.6). >> >> Anyone know what's going on? Is there a release upcoming to fix this? Yeah -- this vulnerability: https://vuxml.freebsd.org/freebsd/c17fe91d-4aa6-11e6-a7bd-14dae9d210b8.ht= ml has been in VuXML since 2016-07-15 but there's no indication of a 4.0.7 release from upstream yet. Given their approach to fixing the buffer overflow was to delete the offending gif2tiff application from the package, perhaps we could simply do the same until 4.0.7 comes out. Cheers, Matthew --Qaiu2p9l05uCLgtgkW6PTwHU6U7i214s6-- --F20QPLI27F5h47vCto5gbfMpNfcjS3xJx Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJXpJY4XxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQxOUYxNTRFQ0JGMTEyRTUwNTQ0RTNGMzAw MDUxM0YxMEUwQTlFNEU3AAoJEABRPxDgqeTnaAEP/0BtN8C1ID3W6N2N96P8K/ej DukFQaz/xvrGq/fRDPUigh/MTGJDntGKLnfcA6DyO52puNCZXxilqS5J7xxA3FaX 2W5rd4LdsiV0B1jAKkoNEp0YyzNcDbWSqVy8OKquFo5qjnx2VdA5GcCVdhkbswhF voXuHEMV3OqgLuS/Mkn7ZpczYrUl+aPaLIrO1eYsT4LZYUg/Mfe5/KNoqBX/3mPG CgFhIANB5FZtl3ep81+faTLRF1F5vMtmxmp3AO1wG/XvDuhGhgGV8LLZvk7rL3wd rW0PE38kYvW8GfXDBFwBxf3PNxdA0uIhuBJdEtt+tuQwOdA7/ssLwGnJ5VbCGlWq L4+ltzE+XL0/LWwwDu0QiS0y0xO4Cc4pLZwbOjAsGMi3ICLFoNHQPkIatEWpdALY FO+D6E6V5EB8PM+WgRJP04TWnIKl+WPVTFWm1B5eAnUDNFcaw7xBThLwzZcTk069 LEhjcCjriu1XBv7UhcqGtPZGMdqlhNftvktndJC7gAXk9zld0spHqhfjeIwIDY9A hj3AE8wC+8cTUcxFL19xlLDUfbGh7N8G6zdDmbGosmz4VuFF7tjUIEeLBkgni/N0 Hdu/XgX2RfI7c1Dp2ZxvjFp/v8ROI41QjJAEGZHEj/7X2QcdvBSmNNxyZ/xvnP/1 NiaOES/i40fDGYhgMLqL =2z+v -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --F20QPLI27F5h47vCto5gbfMpNfcjS3xJx-- From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Aug 5 13:41:38 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06199BAF80C for ; Fri, 5 Aug 2016 13:41:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tech-lists@zyxst.net) Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com (out2-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D333D130A for ; Fri, 5 Aug 2016 13:41:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tech-lists@zyxst.net) Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5272620564 for ; Fri, 5 Aug 2016 09:41:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 05 Aug 2016 09:41:36 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zyxst.net; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:message-id :mime-version:subject:to:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=7WZ 3sGHipligeAf/UDr1wDjk8DE=; b=EtN6i5e5MGLs3ONeJDQ1YAHfFMSpYgrGY3R N3NDR+z7CI13oxU1gTsuo7vYDWVFbQC9l4Uz7mafmZMSeI6Qvca6Vpo53eoZilb5 7mppcGOGks+XhrLspceGaOgZTS+8+XYz69CyycBxBJcXIqSiVh2PGsXwd66B1ucN iIiryX+E= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:to:x-sasl-enc :x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=7WZ3sGHipligeAf/UDr1wDjk8DE=; b=e+Ol6 Cf3KLiKgOWrwixw+IZz7RWjxUJRmm9HLhw6Tn5ZXO0BKwntZFYoD8kHQYBoSnbbG Ei4Yn8hxi2yAVTWbLusHO7JlA3cfPlOzy1MqCXciW2k2QAAtQVY3zZae50VMiUuP Ibpy/pyfjvg1u/Jjw75N2vUZYMHV48FiMN/15o= X-Sasl-enc: DaoHDNM3M5It/lalunam5YGOIsQbmGfeJm6pcit/j8Xd 1470404495 Received: from pumpkin.growveg.org (potato.growveg.org [82.70.91.102]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id D27E0F2C78 for ; Fri, 5 Aug 2016 09:41:35 -0400 (EDT) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: tech-lists Subject: IPv6 query Message-ID: Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2016 14:41:35 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2016 13:41:38 -0000 Hi, Is it possible to have the *same interface* set with a static IP for IPv4 but dynamic for IPv6 ? thanks, -- J. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Aug 5 14:03:13 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C87EBB0306 for ; Fri, 5 Aug 2016 14:03:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:c4ea:bd49:619b:6cb3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk", Issuer "infracaninophile.co.uk" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3868B1753 for ; Fri, 5 Aug 2016 14:03:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from zero-gravitas.local (unknown [85.199.232.226]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EFCDF8988 for ; Fri, 5 Aug 2016 14:03:09 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk; dmarc=none header.from=FreeBSD.org Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/EFCDF8988; dkim=none; dkim-atps=neutral Subject: Re: IPv6 query To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: From: Matthew Seaman Message-ID: <6405536d-52d3-d262-b6ee-904083e7c30a@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2016 15:03:03 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="vENaI3QhT0fSl3oNTFG1BnQ0gKQ6KppTc" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RDNS_NONE, SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2016 14:03:13 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --vENaI3QhT0fSl3oNTFG1BnQ0gKQ6KppTc Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="bPj47swflpIM4KB8eiEJ3pbxnXhf43CS6" From: Matthew Seaman To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <6405536d-52d3-d262-b6ee-904083e7c30a@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: IPv6 query References: In-Reply-To: --bPj47swflpIM4KB8eiEJ3pbxnXhf43CS6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2016/08/05 14:41, tech-lists wrote: > Is it possible to have the *same interface* set with a static IP for > IPv4 but dynamic for IPv6 ? Sure. The IPv4 and IPv6 configuration bits in /etc/rc.conf are pretty independent. Having something like: ifconfig_em0=3D"inet 192.0.2.1/24" and ifconfig_em0_ipv6=3D"inet6 accept_rtadv" shouldn't be a problem at all. (assuming by 'dynamic' you mean SLAAC. DHCP6 is left as an excercise for the reader.) Cheers, Matthew --bPj47swflpIM4KB8eiEJ3pbxnXhf43CS6-- --vENaI3QhT0fSl3oNTFG1BnQ0gKQ6KppTc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJXpJydXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQxOUYxNTRFQ0JGMTEyRTUwNTQ0RTNGMzAw MDUxM0YxMEUwQTlFNEU3AAoJEABRPxDgqeTnt0wQAIL3MeY5Tf2C9lE/IDJJEQkb h2mfBV3bzdo6qDZO7X10qa6p6OEHnx66oeZTJwcYfzSUwvJT/4GbsOL3LYuuW+iK 0PAS6dddY/UkRhYcu8TKnpso3lIG4oeePHEwWpJdphN2S/TfdsPlNDFSg0IDFFA0 lxGimUGwp/Qa2mVU/LcfZDrcrBvRb/3iQ3TzR8OOvacJjOrVaQJ7EcoPCeJEtz9M 6YyiWLhZnaVpTzOIZ67MOqufFSW8UkxUuSfXknilgZu+n2JYXUiuSaj85vLsdv4u m776a+hBvlCcUp9i6FkHj9FXXd6AdeYYtNfNTS4aAgBmjgjww2Nzlar9PKEsnuBp ccn+QlDskaueAo61NmPNvL93MgGQfcJZ9EV7Ctu7/0T4ch+k/tItdbNsNYMcO6c3 kiNH79wHRpPeaKMdqhkpOQxgeDr2z4CsiWM/XsDO+aQstPmqm99mA5xIEzzjmpCL tsEXKaeWvZTuxE5SXKDHp0gjhjSOuvN4nf3xwopMLDAWT+5LQ8FA7Ip66LpFWBK7 C2IaihESZCARDw2DOQsxS+AZPxUmTO6GPjP2LNLLH1hKlDSnyDg7rGG0Vp2YCV7p Cqc6sJa1Gwys1aFQjo2EQF7VI1TYtYHUpf1GPJEiCxkLjQ6cFe1e5MoHHGS6ifNB GUq4JLwqU9z+Wt/tYlFL =iA2w -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --vENaI3QhT0fSl3oNTFG1BnQ0gKQ6KppTc-- From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Aug 5 14:38:54 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C214CBB0F07 for ; Fri, 5 Aug 2016 14:38:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tech-lists@zyxst.net) Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com (out2-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A5091F7B for ; Fri, 5 Aug 2016 14:38:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tech-lists@zyxst.net) Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3736420283 for ; Fri, 5 Aug 2016 10:38:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend2 ([10.202.2.161]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 05 Aug 2016 10:38:53 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zyxst.net; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-sasl-enc :x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=xJnaHEWUaYAS1amlJHFcRAwxxmg=; b=RRERpQ LkbEamnRSjavEPBBFGiWF4cejEG0+YD2oNjkCxhwQ4W+kcRvMcsaqG+kpFg6YyiS JgtK5h1ejM36CKla+c4nhuomDB7P8IalEtXiuX4x4i5Z2JCTlZDHt8gY9msVTHs7 6j+vg9j22LcNhnwl3yzHrKrtlewE7lLE45fKc= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=xJnaHEWUaYAS1am lJHFcRAwxxmg=; b=sVaDm9dJ9pEosWdazc+X0Bex11twwnyVzNa4nK3+jJnde0A wrjdiLJ1mGP3eUT37BClivhRs/17Id4JT3YtTsvJY2vCWBBszd38NoCX9VSp9CED tuvTSmv/yApA6z8ID+AI8WorWMsRWcBKN6iZxkLW0KcCtQE7R8cmz1kmB8R8= X-Sasl-enc: s+Tue/0FGm13AsiHLA2QjBZrwcaofbAfHchxfEGQvoIG 1470407932 Received: from pumpkin.growveg.org (potato.growveg.org [82.70.91.102]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id BF7E1CCD84 for ; Fri, 5 Aug 2016 10:38:52 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: IPv6 query To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <6405536d-52d3-d262-b6ee-904083e7c30a@FreeBSD.org> From: tech-lists Message-ID: Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2016 15:38:52 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <6405536d-52d3-d262-b6ee-904083e7c30a@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2016 14:38:54 -0000 On 05/08/2016 15:03, Matthew Seaman wrote: > Sure. The IPv4 and IPv6 configuration bits in /etc/rc.conf are pretty > independent. Having something like: > > ifconfig_em0="inet 192.0.2.1/24" > > and > > ifconfig_em0_ipv6="inet6 accept_rtadv" > > shouldn't be a problem at all. > > (assuming by 'dynamic' you mean SLAAC. DHCP6 is left as an excercise > for the reader.) xlnt, that's how I had it. I think it maybe either router or ISP failure for now, thanks for your help -- J. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Aug 5 14:50:39 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7030BBAF442 for ; Fri, 5 Aug 2016 14:50:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from trond@fagskolen.gjovik.no) Received: from smtp.fagskolen.gjovik.no (smtp.fagskolen.gjovik.no [IPv6:2001:700:1100:1:200:ff:fe00:b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.fagskolen.gjovik.no", Issuer "Fagskolen i Gj??vik" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 06827185C for ; Fri, 5 Aug 2016 14:50:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from trond@fagskolen.gjovik.no) Received: from mail.fig.ol.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.fig.ol.no (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id u75EoSCi023484 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 5 Aug 2016 16:50:28 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from trond@fagskolen.gjovik.no) Received: from localhost (trond@localhost) by mail.fig.ol.no (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) with ESMTP id u75EoR3f023481; Fri, 5 Aug 2016 16:50:27 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from trond@fagskolen.gjovik.no) X-Authentication-Warning: mail.fig.ol.no: trond owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2016 16:50:27 +0200 (CEST) From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Trond_Endrest=F8l?= Sender: Trond.Endrestol@fagskolen.gjovik.no To: tech-lists cc: FreeBSD questions Subject: Re: IPv6 query In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (BSF 67 2015-01-07) Organization: Fagskolen Innlandet OpenPGP: url=http://fig.ol.no/~trond/trond.key MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on mail.fig.ol.no Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2016 14:50:39 -0000 On Fri, 5 Aug 2016 14:41+0100, tech-lists wrote: > Is it possible to have the *same interface* set with a static IP for > IPv4 but dynamic for IPv6 ? Sure: ifconfig_em0="inet 192.168.1.2 netmask 255.255.255.0" ifconfig_em0_ipv6="inet6 accept_rtadv" defaultrouter="192.168.1.1" -- +-------------------------------+------------------------------------+ | Vennlig hilsen, | Best regards, | | Trond Endrestøl, | Trond Endrestøl, | | IT-ansvarlig, | System administrator, | | Fagskolen Innlandet, | Gjøvik Technical College, Norway, | | tlf. mob. 952 62 567, | Cellular...: +47 952 62 567, | | sentralbord 61 14 54 00. | Switchboard: +47 61 14 54 00. | +-------------------------------+------------------------------------+ From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Aug 5 15:44:13 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F19A1BB0674; Fri, 5 Aug 2016 15:44:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from koobs.freebsd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pf0-x232.google.com (mail-pf0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD9611E57; Fri, 5 Aug 2016 15:44:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from koobs.freebsd@gmail.com) Received: by mail-pf0-x232.google.com with SMTP id y134so98374690pfg.0; Fri, 05 Aug 2016 08:44:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:reply-to:subject:references:to:cc:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=JMkM0T7CSeiS7MTntA7sgMXzn6eQwm8r6SFbzXRt2nY=; b=ygKkxgp3XRVuThDrwMRS+T6ZDXIW+OMJvXwY9lZQuvdi0tIXTheEWw4WQ9IXLPGpU6 9JNp4Ej42Jg72LZ/biW+VrtjIACgRMLXj+ptyVZ8MamC/fjfe6UiyGnHC6ULisVEe5+T 8T1pVH5sstpGPggmWATtMgqeFvguZr2khX6KqJ8qfZ3T8uX/c9qyci4P1U8aG1pWEB2K pkgS2RXzSf9u3wYl+KYbLukSHvQFNIxXR1qbTacfr8G7i2wxEcSpcE5fXn0PM+nCE8rT rV5l0dwOQ8XTSzAP9n99thKG1mXykXgFMvUxTlIyuX2Mc1LAN8o2fgOFn/IKWOHNMB5s 6nmg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:reply-to:subject:references:to:cc:from :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=JMkM0T7CSeiS7MTntA7sgMXzn6eQwm8r6SFbzXRt2nY=; b=F2olbR13TXTYGetopzRjJBL3TzUZ2eyeE2mI8IIBvpeOplcNE/Nv/yW2LnP5FTT7A9 lr1pQyCanD571lTBYo1hRWQ97PgfridNrgg5/mTLg6B1FbUxF5g3sM3tzpx2CTTnfj12 mIR2ieEsWs3HFhfuySRlrXq91n6di4YHJpb0ro7gNj5M9gZ0gvy7acI0AdJXuCgqDjsx cgs9K6eDYlLB5Hyc6VWgHCAkNAIKjY74XABF8f1nYTworXPxz3ekjVNTWrjra31SPeIN gkaBiLmu5VuNJ43JpuzaVJfgONeMaUob3XhLI0+UDs1mZf43xQs3LHHCst5YhnH4qG52 FQ0Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoouv7Tak4MvTpDQkmvW7XoKlOurvfoByWJE+iv6Ed6DeIAbZgesR3SfAIpkeDbHaQ0w== X-Received: by 10.98.8.142 with SMTP id 14mr137882722pfi.57.1470411853189; Fri, 05 Aug 2016 08:44:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2001:44b8:31ae:7b01:f985:3c4b:2a0c:8bea? (2001-44b8-31ae-7b01-f985-3c4b-2a0c-8bea.static.ipv6.internode.on.net. [2001:44b8:31ae:7b01:f985:3c4b:2a0c:8bea]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ra13sm29077677pac.29.2016.08.05.08.44.10 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 05 Aug 2016 08:44:12 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Kubilay Kocak Reply-To: koobs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: tiff vulnerability in ports? References: <33ac70de-78b6-dc54-e81f-3153d0d721e4@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org, alexmiroslav@gmail.com Cc: Matthew Seaman , FreeBSD Ports Security Team From: Kubilay Kocak Message-ID: Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2016 01:43:56 +1000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:50.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/50.0a2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <33ac70de-78b6-dc54-e81f-3153d0d721e4@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-AU Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2016 15:44:14 -0000 On 5/08/2016 11:35 PM, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 2016/08/05 13:55, alphachi wrote: >> Please see this link to get more information: >> >> https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=revision&revision=418585 >> >> 2016-08-05 0:23 GMT+08:00 Aleksandr Miroslav : >> >>> This is perhaps a question for the tiff devs more than anything, but I >>> noticed that pkg audit has been complaining about libtiff (graphics/tiff) >>> for some time now. >>> >>> FreeBSD's VUXML database says anything before 4.0.7 is affected, but >>> apparently that version hasn't been released yet (according to >>> http://www.remotesensing.org/libtiff/, the latest stable release is still >>> 4.0.6). >>> >>> Anyone know what's going on? Is there a release upcoming to fix this? > > Yeah -- this vulnerability: > > https://vuxml.freebsd.org/freebsd/c17fe91d-4aa6-11e6-a7bd-14dae9d210b8.html > > has been in VuXML since 2016-07-15 but there's no indication of a 4.0.7 > release from upstream yet. > > Given their approach to fixing the buffer overflow was to delete the > offending gif2tiff application from the package, perhaps we could simply > do the same until 4.0.7 comes out. > > Cheers, > > Matthew > > Hi Aleksandr :) Also: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211405 Please add a comment to that bug to request resolution of the issue. Alternatively you (and anyone else) can just delete gif2tiff Unfortunately you are yet one more example of a user that's been left in the lurch without information or recourse wondering (rightfully) how they can resolve or mitigate this vulnerability. Our apologies. Hope that helps. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Aug 5 16:51:45 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C815EBB0749 for ; Fri, 5 Aug 2016 16:51:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fluca1978@gmail.com) Received: from mail-oi0-x22c.google.com (mail-oi0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 90C741E5A for ; Fri, 5 Aug 2016 16:51:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fluca1978@gmail.com) Received: by mail-oi0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id 4so161742081oih.2 for ; Fri, 05 Aug 2016 09:51:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=kVGgB5Ov0WuTrPjCJpnyKeogBF/qftUKbl0ZQiIfI+w=; b=S6ocgd6BNe1Kth8Lpydh72XAlsbXDFhXfbXJojjsEx3xZMBOLqcV+cPtFA/+6QG10+ B9Hl2TR1IsnGmslmzMmuedJPXqW7hOixQ+2IQw7TM1f17lxGgsvwPxCzsg7NHZzIWvAN IxauuFriak+TN/bDfUav+qyWoXz/cuhGVF138SPiodCcMVcZy8syZnvYNqW7rj4stINS 6ULtDq/a3hvK3l1PQMrkE9kZqRtv1RVelpAfF4vWPj0+Z0UmRafD4ckzD4bwHvj0sFv4 Gzhmq1P532/P03Xcs4/ow7YlksFXVgPKCFKpn6qhypeQ7XeobYuVvxOKl2shDKqpkIuC XrGA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:from:date:message-id:subject :to; bh=kVGgB5Ov0WuTrPjCJpnyKeogBF/qftUKbl0ZQiIfI+w=; b=X56Je7qNRm2KejAJaFvmjqBLQH3OnAmfBVpTxEGEAAvXCBrfq1wwfmFPdQCL+uSg1L 1J234LHzjv5Es1Ny6Hu6pv6gM6ot/QDduobnJ8PyUcQ8sVef/5cePifVMoWnUXfoePKq QDKkRLJCJMZF+ObzeuKC8i2y7eu41yTS5x5KpeincTcqKeocPlGUPvRyZYZJl5Boyttq RsKupNprQLl+MiORVb2IE55H8wWECu6pZdpF+ngXz4A1p1yOuE/choIQTP3aK0oOrjBz mIQHiDNRji6TEv1mSWM/Fv85i8ewqT/68WTYi5uBQfrqv1HsP+Y+kInG7fX3MLJO/kmX jlzQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoouvjIC5dh3N84YLCXCvoisKMLQHl404dceW4rCCW4kXX8r/xPaHPiWPg3xL7huUHavMbK/gJMwiJj476pg== X-Received: by 10.202.188.213 with SMTP id m204mr43729412oif.85.1470415904456; Fri, 05 Aug 2016 09:51:44 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: fluca1978@gmail.com Received: by 10.157.11.124 with HTTP; Fri, 5 Aug 2016 09:51:43 -0700 (PDT) From: Luca Ferrari Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2016 18:51:43 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: LeqQOHqKEN4nNFsAPWwClrFrEH8 Message-ID: Subject: game machine based on FreeBSD? To: freebsd-questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2016 16:51:45 -0000 Hi all, I'm just curious if there is any effort or possibility to build up a FreeBSD gaming machine. Since I've seen SteamOS I'm just curious to be able to make a machine based on FreeBSD (and therefore use it also as a nas thru ZFS). Links and/or suggestions are welcome. Thanks, Luca From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Aug 5 17:17:25 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DF16BAF049 for ; Fri, 5 Aug 2016 17:17:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stdin@niklaas.eu) Received: from mx.box-hlm-01.niklaas.eu (mx.box-hlm-01.niklaas.eu [IPv6:2a02:2770:15:0:21a:4aff:fe1b:d1ad]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CEB112AF for ; Fri, 5 Aug 2016 17:17:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stdin@niklaas.eu) Received: from box-hlm-03.niklaas.eu (box-hlm-03.niklaas.eu [IPv6:2a02:2770:15:0:21a:4aff:feaa:e902]) by mx.box-hlm-01.niklaas.eu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B58272C353B for ; Fri, 5 Aug 2016 19:16:56 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2016 19:16:51 +0200 From: Niklaas Baudet von Gersdorff To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: game machine based on FreeBSD? Message-ID: <20160805171651.GD80518@box-hlm-03.niklaas.eu> Reply-To: stdin@niklaas.eu Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2016 17:17:25 -0000 Luca Ferrari [2016-08-05 18:51 +0200] : > I'm just curious if there is any effort or possibility to build up a > FreeBSD gaming machine. Since I've seen SteamOS > I'm just curious to be able > to make a machine based on FreeBSD (and therefore use it also as a nas > thru ZFS). AFAIK SteamOS is based on Linux. I remember a short discussion about running Steam on FreeBSD eventually stating that they are incompatible. I guess (please correct me if I am wrong) the main problem is FreeBSD's insufficient support for graphic cards, shaders et cetera. That said, while there is an increasing amount of games becoming compatible with Linux-based systems, I suspect we must wait even longer for them to be ported to FreeBSD. This is not to say that I don't embrace your idea and haven't thought about it by myself though. :-) Niklaas From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Aug 5 17:42:16 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57825BAF805 for ; Fri, 5 Aug 2016 17:42:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsd@bontempi.net) Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com (out2-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 30FC613A2 for ; Fri, 5 Aug 2016 17:42:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsd@bontempi.net) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46C3C20649 for ; Fri, 5 Aug 2016 13:42:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: from web6 ([10.202.2.216]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 05 Aug 2016 13:42:14 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bontempi.net; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-sasl-enc :x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=XYLbgAvLIimuEdiBm0PN1w359vY=; b=mSSIqu NKnnFGtD5mFA7U6XBcJInUsKk45SyTe0kdyu4AnYfdpvss2usaY7WJZQp0hKK9uy jXVJFlTHV8tLBiYcR4np28zbI9O/rAjOF5WwM9Yl9Ex/FWw6L7+RCnjD3bxKGQ/O /6MIM3kxsXTIOujDVt+gnlCEKw1pJcnpeXkVk= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=XYLbgAvLIimuEdi Bm0PN1w359vY=; b=nwFZvks65L8Q67HlYNTz9C0bx5E5q6FmLsfFZ1d5bCtCZGp mAZAfHtqt1FslcAgBJgBYeewb2ZCWTU7ZocRIzjGDlavEd9bRoFjYpvdDgpYLwUO FfE8VCB6OQXGNvoDo/aSVrpCiOx9AZZql6eb8SeLD05Xxhed16JAVsCe45Ck= Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 99) id 1848F1E380; Fri, 5 Aug 2016 13:42:14 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <1470418934.757593.687175257.101757B0@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-Sasl-Enc: 6AZg29+SEjbYWvF8FUO0mq7oqEGA5DgZ2B+irB3U75Oc 1470418934 From: Priyadarshan To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-b9085e99 Subject: Re: game machine based on FreeBSD? Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2016 17:42:14 +0000 In-Reply-To: <20160805171651.GD80518@box-hlm-03.niklaas.eu> References: <20160805171651.GD80518@box-hlm-03.niklaas.eu> X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2016 17:42:16 -0000 > Luca Ferrari [2016-08-05 18:51 +0200] : > > > I'm just curious if there is any effort or possibility to build up a > > FreeBSD gaming machine. Since I've seen SteamOS > > I'm just curious to be able > > to make a machine based on FreeBSD (and therefore use it also as a nas > > thru ZFS). On Reddit there was a post not too long ago: https://www.reddit.com/r/BSD/comments/4v62m1/steam_on_freebsd_11current/ From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Aug 5 18:33:41 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0A3BBB04D5 for ; Fri, 5 Aug 2016 18:33:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yuri@rawbw.com) Received: from shell1.rawbw.com (shell1.rawbw.com [198.144.192.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78DF91E93 for ; Fri, 5 Aug 2016 18:33:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yuri@rawbw.com) Received: from yuri.doctorlan.com (c-24-5-143-190.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [24.5.143.190]) (authenticated bits=0) by shell1.rawbw.com (8.15.1/8.15.1) with ESMTPSA id u75IXYP8053589 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 5 Aug 2016 11:33:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from yuri@rawbw.com) X-Authentication-Warning: shell1.rawbw.com: Host c-24-5-143-190.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [24.5.143.190] claimed to be yuri.doctorlan.com From: Yuri Subject: Any way to cache large /etc/hosts files? To: FreeBSD Questions Message-ID: Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2016 11:33:33 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2016 18:33:41 -0000 Some people suggest using pre-compiled lists of ad and malware domains and block them on DNS level. (ex. https://github.com/StevenBlack/hosts) The resulting hosts file is about 1MB. nscd(8) caches DNS results, but it does this on name by name basis. Every new domain name request, even within the same process, causes /etc/hosts file to be reread again. Is there a way to cache /etc/hosts once and use it? Yuri From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Aug 5 18:45:35 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F226BB0909 for ; Fri, 5 Aug 2016 18:45:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from mail-in2.apple.com (mail-out2.apple.com [17.151.62.25]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F93F1A29 for ; Fri, 5 Aug 2016 18:45:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from relay7.apple.com (relay7.apple.com [17.128.113.101]) by mail-in2.apple.com (Apple Secure Mail Relay) with SMTP id 66.49.10360.8CED4A75; Fri, 5 Aug 2016 11:45:28 -0700 (PDT) X-AuditID: 11973e11-f79e76d000002878-3b-57a4dec89df1 Received: from [17.150.218.105] (Unknown_Domain [17.150.218.105]) (using TLS with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by relay7.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with SMTP id DC.11.25167.8CED4A75; Fri, 5 Aug 2016 11:45:28 -0700 (PDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\)) Subject: Re: Any way to cache large /etc/hosts files? From: Charles Swiger In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2016 11:45:27 -0700 Cc: FreeBSD - Message-Id: <00938E41-D041-48E6-A561-24AC721D0C42@mac.com> References: To: Yuri X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124) X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFjrGLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUi2FCYqnvi3pJwg/2bRCxeft3EYvFh+wEm ByaPGZ/ms3gsXHOBNYApissmJTUnsyy1SN8ugSuj8+gb5oJF0hVTLz1kaWD8Lt7FyMkhIWAi seH1FyYIW0ziwr31bF2MXBxCAvsYJX6ducgKU7Tv2Fp2iMR0Jonp566wgySYBRIk1i5fzQhi 8wroSWxa/xZskrCAqUTHoZPMXYwcHGwCahITJvKAhDkFbCUuta4HK2ERUJG4PHkKE8QYXYmm G2+hxlhJrL2zC2y8kICNxKp5W1lAbBEBSYlLN86yQ9wjK/Hk5CIWkHskBDawSexb9JB5AqPg LCQnzUJyEkRcW2LZwtfMs4BOYhbQkZi8kBFVGML+eP4I0wJGtlWMQrmJmTm6mXlGeokFBTmp esn5uZsYQQE/3U5wB+PxVVaHGAU4GJV4eH9sWBIuxJpYVlyZe4hRmoNFSZx33RagkEB6Yklq dmpqQWpRfFFpTmrxIUYmDk6pBsaCcqXPOrmmMVo+Me8nayt8zN6SpsqgYJx8xv9hR0vCG848 ld+dglnPfh2NY8p/wS98S/37PPdtl1w9b0gyhxhbxc3pmHfzB/OUvRpTi9ISo5f/nrirJ2xf TbTWX5tUUaP8w919gV8bSkzONDY2Lrc/ePDT06lzjHizQldvrRCOlklS+CYkosRSnJFoqMVc VJwIAK8OKjJZAgAA X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFtrAIsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUiOO1Wpu6Je0vCDRYtZbd4+XUTi8WH7QeY HJg8Znyaz+KxcM0F1gCmKC6blNSczLLUIn27BK6MzqNvmAsWSVdMvfSQpYHxu3gXIyeHhICJ xL5ja9khbDGJC/fWs3UxcnEICUxnkph+7gpYglkgQWLt8tWMIDavgJ7EpvVvmUBsYQFTiY5D J5m7GDk42ATUJCZM5AEJcwrYSlxqXQ9WwiKgInF58hQmiDG6Ek033kKNsZJYe2cX2HghARuJ VfO2soDYIgKSEpdunIW6R1biyclFLBMY+WYhuWIWkisg4toSyxa+Zp4FdAWzgI7E5IWMqMIQ 9sfzR5gWMLKtYhQoSs1JrDTXSywoyEnVS87P3cQICtCGwtQdjI3LrQ4xCnAwKvHwLli3JFyI NbGsuDL3EKMEB7OSCO/z20Ah3pTEyqrUovz4otKc1OJDjBMZgZ6cyCwlmpwPjJ+8knhDExMD E2NjM2NjcxNzWgorifP6zVkcLiSQnliSmp2aWpBaBHMUEwenVAPjlJMxugUBbsuFjun1vH0Z /ZyrafkURWu9zdbMlz6+ShdyOCEseOfIuRsRV6/Pd+suuczSd0M27KGu4fJs+dwJjYv/Bq4P Vmh5ovfdXenjHxHPU6EtNU8+3HhhVJaZflN3q2iZQOifKN8ajVNeefl2O81P7M70kXg+16jN Xb7n5Kv/Ik86JhgpsRRnJBpqMRcVJwIAjTiVnsMCAAA= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2016 18:45:35 -0000 Hi, Yuri-- Take a look into DNS RPZ, aka DNS blacklisting (the common use case): https://dnsrpz.info Recent versions of ISC BIND support this.... Regards, --=20 -Chuck On Aug 5, 2016, at 11:33 AM, Yuri wrote: > Some people suggest using pre-compiled lists of ad and malware domains = and block them on DNS level. (ex. https://github.com/StevenBlack/hosts) >=20 > The resulting hosts file is about 1MB. nscd(8) caches DNS results, but = it does this on name by name basis. Every new domain name request, even = within the same process, causes /etc/hosts file to be reread again. >=20 >=20 > Is there a way to cache /etc/hosts once and use it? >=20 >=20 > Yuri >=20 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Aug 5 19:19:21 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4087DBB00E4 for ; Fri, 5 Aug 2016 19:19:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andrewjameswood@ymail.com) Received: from nm39-vm9.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.com (nm39-vm9.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.com [212.82.97.168]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C79A10CD for ; Fri, 5 Aug 2016 19:19:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andrewjameswood@ymail.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ymail.com; s=s2048; t=1470424610; bh=sBqQEcyWI0/yDPlw8Rcvzfh/Z9bRPKditdwHIbZPng0=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From:Subject; b=UcgX6li/RVFHIXODQAyk5NLzzTkI4U8xIek5uXmVx9yzxnw7nOZ3M7VI4s8y598cb8J12O0nj8FYKzTCsL+eFs1KLMZXrGIo+3hjkxPwxb55p/SwpdNv9uAkKq+Kc69nxD3k+8+LdyXVl53xAvNFfDuqHFsrahBYgNxKstYaph7uoReq+HZpuROMvPu9oj3XGnHkcIe1UF/GrlgRUUh688BqDGQDjtDasDahSS9dVpqN62wytlH3ioFkqZpKqpoptry0bVosvOWytvdUM2fZB4/gtbVA14iVxoLzTHeKD5p3c/nvyVlzyE+NQDfmzJAHEcok6GJC12pmLRW5phbDpg== Received: from [212.82.98.126] by nm39.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 05 Aug 2016 19:16:50 -0000 Received: from [46.228.39.91] by tm19.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 05 Aug 2016 19:16:50 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp128.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 05 Aug 2016 19:16:50 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 958250.83760.bm@smtp128.mail.ir2.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: dCq7X2sVM1kpPvpTe0bMAhpLI5KnoUFLAe__OXFcHtqxTh0 ZruWCWKb84JXcp96cBByHKGHxS45AjhatuAUCQ2ll4.YuTFiibYGDdigojbk 35iF39M0mt6UAfUw_VqqI4LMEPYGDFXWt1ysuyz_wa2XX_eb7Qwngvaa8Cky r6VdYLiDNWxj0FaJCEW6TvVcEpcQLgCUL0k24.cn..jNliSWWmWqh34S1XAo CEUr.nT_eOEgXmAQIMhfBikuHe_V4JmkBDdfQ7NYji4otUxrEngevGHraRO8 q3HJN9O2bbatD3Q9VfFOzRhC1FEZ6Mx9O3C4R3fTjFsYuvLiAEI6xLa0_vZN rorUHbh55pslxyjYE9DnrlMovVP4jlxfsCKLOJXE.OtWR0Kmw9nTO.oles_4 Qt8iWF7pFoKWhPf3JRDflzG2fxH8.fJckHbcwp8IMwTzziC6FS0q47e7IFnX TzUGLuKVGvS8eJNF6FME8W2z4JfN_AN09Xq8yRNzAYLWegFZo1c6gTSxpFkV XPabxHjauOMEwmg7jTzdWxBBXfK.Ht6.X3_wLTyRkzA0hg0C5Mz6gO7KWywk E2YADhJbHkbJHgAtDeA-- X-Yahoo-SMTP: lyMebeuswBAKXlSCZ4_eELrg31ykJBp.BALgvdbr.jksrQi8VqI- Subject: Re: Creating a pkg To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <981a28ca-09a4-995b-fee3-55d4a6dc5fb3@ymail.com> <889eda92-91ce-ecd0-3426-97b688093102@ymail.com> <4e9ba369-ea20-03d4-f549-17a5bd73e66e@FreeBSD.org> From: Andrew Wood Message-ID: <2532ed27-902f-67ad-8dc2-0a1da9874f79@ymail.com> Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2016 20:16:50 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/45.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2016 19:19:21 -0000 On 29/07/16 18:33, Andrew Wood via freebsd-questions wrote: > On 28/07/16 22:14, Matthew Seaman wrote: > >> Note that >> pkg(8) will automatically calculate the file checksums so you can >> leave those bits out of >> your manifest > What is the syntax for doing this, what would I put in the files {} > section where the hash would normally go? > > OK after trial and error not helped by the fact that different docs seems to have different syntax, Ive managed to put together a pkg which will install all the files at the desired location and remove them again when the pkg is uninstalled. I can also set the file permissions but not the owner or group owner, which Im doing like this: files: { /path/to/file: {uname: 'username', gname: 'groupname',perm: 644}; } I suspect theres nothing wrong with that, the problem is simply that it isnt creating the user or group in the first place. Am I right in assuming that is the purpose of users: ["username"]; groups: ["groupname", "groupname2"]; If so why is it not making the necessary entries in the /etc/passwd or /etc/group files? Thanks Andrew From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat Aug 6 00:19:26 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5DC5BAE925; Sat, 6 Aug 2016 00:19:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: from mail-it0-x235.google.com (mail-it0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6C4711B84; Sat, 6 Aug 2016 00:19:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: by mail-it0-x235.google.com with SMTP id x130so34640484ite.1; Fri, 05 Aug 2016 17:19:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=ZuYhe+UHm3lkiQx90ASVqj/J9PAwyfRgnbfRmM5QoH4=; b=SgvUfP18Uue6GmpmhDpvlE8WE4Yf9seMa7sbbUQ0zSR/yihoXd+OFJK4b8BI0DcMxi O/eoul0R/rcIz8bvVHhI1bTvc78P1SPBPiVBQyzsML6ydHRx9Uk7Jw+MktSauaIyVy/Y +cUq6J6dOokFSZZBcGZHir0RDPno70prmsVJ7cS54cDqhi5PiB5bCPrzCAZVdA76jfwp LFyvnwT66KAIxHGV3Y7XQkLWmlITJl6YTfzBQINOgAe1gcZ/YwxrwDgoSrvSTBIwcMqg NwvB8oylFxmmmtwtCNosyjkVsUnwSzHnjPBsNyrCrpeVQumwsnyXYHTX8si10Lb64U82 7bEw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ZuYhe+UHm3lkiQx90ASVqj/J9PAwyfRgnbfRmM5QoH4=; b=DNzB7KipeHseL6Q1LyZn8UjrlsbD6eolyjF9/z9Re2WuvPykixawKGNX8F8oKa8k8u KvtyJMbXVT1+/yp/5aJww0Mi1rzzRjPuX12h1xISw+7OW0R4pQPiGAb/y9nR6925OTKs sNqEXlp5r8naO2HXOwC8otMCxZD8UEnrNIzTv/802bwjY2WSpoaG25M0FQz1zYt+gAt6 Gzr50EoKE0Wssvlm/la1QRCDT2Dto6hrdKh5R4Z7Q8FZNdy7Kk9RBx/7KlpKtHXNLezs a1BsYcBoDN8oKMmh0tcB0DgU7yRu3qCcMMKCH+b2d1/kYnZt9ZotX2fsSGNRaNy9l7GG cHdA== X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoousUCnl5QImAYcLd9YTLGCSokJowe9CSoY2GPHOdFYglZU0dVEUWNcS1GaIkLvbgjOefOd8dOBZTirnYLw== X-Received: by 10.36.3.15 with SMTP id e15mr7677462ite.40.1470442765719; Fri, 05 Aug 2016 17:19:25 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: kob6558@gmail.com Received: by 10.79.119.144 with HTTP; Fri, 5 Aug 2016 17:19:25 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <33ac70de-78b6-dc54-e81f-3153d0d721e4@FreeBSD.org> From: Kevin Oberman Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2016 17:19:25 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: tc50mK44397J3wUHgWLmCBT-xEU Message-ID: Subject: Re: tiff vulnerability in ports? To: koobs@freebsd.org Cc: Mailinglists FreeBSD , FreeBSD Ports ML , alexmiroslav@gmail.com, FreeBSD Ports Security Team , Matthew Seaman X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 06 Aug 2016 00:35:47 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Aug 2016 00:19:26 -0000 On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 8:43 AM, Kubilay Kocak wrote: > On 5/08/2016 11:35 PM, Matthew Seaman wrote: > > On 2016/08/05 13:55, alphachi wrote: > >> Please see this link to get more information: > >> > >> https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=revision&revision=418585 > >> > >> 2016-08-05 0:23 GMT+08:00 Aleksandr Miroslav : > >> > >>> This is perhaps a question for the tiff devs more than anything, but I > >>> noticed that pkg audit has been complaining about libtiff > (graphics/tiff) > >>> for some time now. > >>> > >>> FreeBSD's VUXML database says anything before 4.0.7 is affected, but > >>> apparently that version hasn't been released yet (according to > >>> http://www.remotesensing.org/libtiff/, the latest stable release is > still > >>> 4.0.6). > >>> > >>> Anyone know what's going on? Is there a release upcoming to fix this? > > > > Yeah -- this vulnerability: > > > > https://vuxml.freebsd.org/freebsd/c17fe91d-4aa6-11e6- > a7bd-14dae9d210b8.html > > > > has been in VuXML since 2016-07-15 but there's no indication of a 4.0.7 > > release from upstream yet. > > > > Given their approach to fixing the buffer overflow was to delete the > > offending gif2tiff application from the package, perhaps we could simply > > do the same until 4.0.7 comes out. > > > > Cheers, > > > > Matthew > > > > > > Hi Aleksandr :) > > Also: > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211405 > > Please add a comment to that bug to request resolution of the issue. > > Alternatively you (and anyone else) can just delete gif2tiff > > Unfortunately you are yet one more example of a user that's been left in > the lurch without information or recourse wondering (rightfully) how > they can resolve or mitigate this vulnerability. Our apologies. > > This one is really annoying in that it is so easily fixed. Just modify the port to not build or even not install gif2tiff. It's not going to be fixed upstream. At least the last message in the bugzilla indicates that the program will simply be removed from 4.0.7 whenever it comes out. FreeBSD should get out front and just delete it now. A fix is trivial, but touches 20 files and, of course, the plist. Guess I should add it to the ticket. -- Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer E-mail: rkoberman@gmail.com PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683 From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat Aug 6 00:50:20 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AF4FBB01BC for ; Sat, 6 Aug 2016 00:50:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andrew@merenbach.com) Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (pb-smtp2.pobox.com [64.147.108.71]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0FB091A81 for ; Sat, 6 Aug 2016 00:50:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andrew@merenbach.com) Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69FA2316BF for ; Fri, 5 Aug 2016 20:49:50 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=mime-version :references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; s=sasl; bh=xGTh9MGqopwdbNFqF8tzQGQmLoM=; b=Ho8Yre L3Asb/88mHknEqzNJrHNmuq0TRAlZZXbqyIpWm6ZB7Jj11zCeSVloOMMxclpxBY7 N+GWp9k8JPtcnvOTnLcWex4KlIwbqlPz94PxQAT8MHd75yjmm0LXvyfhVoXJPrU3 7hLXmIs005cxCx2bnJ9EVc1eifkEyfHbMCnXo= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61B87316BE for ; Fri, 5 Aug 2016 20:49:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail-vk0-f42.google.com (unknown [209.85.213.42]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 10B67316BD for ; Fri, 5 Aug 2016 20:49:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-vk0-f42.google.com with SMTP id s189so203364077vkh.1 for ; Fri, 05 Aug 2016 17:49:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Gm-Message-State: AEkooutq/Qo33rSHqcDWmDPK98O4Wxh9sPrDRMdRDvH7qoFjtJPCjCt6OIO0HKo0XP8AROoMSOBLuhwTyFcieA== X-Received: by 10.31.50.22 with SMTP id y22mr21303613vky.94.1470444589439; Fri, 05 Aug 2016 17:49:49 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Andrew Merenbach Date: Sat, 06 Aug 2016 00:49:38 +0000 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: game machine based on FreeBSD? To: freebsd-questions X-Pobox-Relay-ID: AE0A2042-5B6F-11E6-A131-EE617A1B28F4-44869218!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Aug 2016 00:50:20 -0000 On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 9:51 AM Luca Ferrari wrote: > I'm just curious if there is any effort or possibility to build up a > FreeBSD gaming machine. Since I've seen SteamOS > I'm just curious to be able > to make a machine based on FreeBSD (and therefore use it also as a nas > thru ZFS). > Links and/or suggestions are welcome. > > Hi Luca, While modern games lie mostly outside my experience with FreeBSD, "retro" game players do have a large amount of flexibility, especially if they are willing and able to install Wine and/or DOSBox. Some examples from my experience, not all of which are of the same caliber: 1. Wine: Fallout 1 and 2, DOOM I and II, Quake II, Return to Castle Wolfenstein, Unreal Gold (the original) 2. Ports: ScummVM (Indiana Jones and the Fate of Atlantis, Flight of the Amazon Queen, many others); Marathon 1, 2: Durandal, and Infinity (plus Aleph One expansion packs like Tempus Irae); DOOM I and II (with caveats) 3. DOSBox: Duke Nuken 3D Atomic Edition, Shadow Warrior, Myst (IIRC=E2=80= =94tried only once), Wolfenstein 3D 4. Terminal: Angband, NetHack, text adventures (e.g., Zork and Curses) 5. Emulator (e.g., VirtualBox): any Windows or Linux games that won't run under Wine or DOSBox, or compile under the FreeBSD ports system I haven't tried early Warcraft games (Warcraft I, II, and III) but I'd be willing to bet they could be run in a combination of DOSBox, Wine, and/or emulation. Cheers, Andrew From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat Aug 6 00:51:12 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93815BB031A; Sat, 6 Aug 2016 00:51:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: from mail-io0-x230.google.com (mail-io0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 54D5A1CC2; Sat, 6 Aug 2016 00:51:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: by mail-io0-x230.google.com with SMTP id m101so313978408ioi.2; Fri, 05 Aug 2016 17:51:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=aXV2pIyPuZF1uuu8uGEwSR/rRtmm3V7sXveJLw8k9ZY=; b=0nLwehc49MpM990CIMXhel7rQZL0QN4eUbcJ33pPcMKND5UV9lvnS8ktRgQ7Ngabp/ pJmjH2oYAwzd2hxtrMeKyeTwdeVqxFI7dtBLvu8BnqjkHvF8MfTG4SqM2L73cn0ZDsBr pdx2KxKMwywgR9QkdO8DI/92ftsJ55izN1vgKPUrgg3cHMrtijUgyMkUFrip1xupc5Qu +ig2QiCjPE2YElCjzibyxVqZhZ5lc8OUC9LOsa1lYVKEucfF7/fXCiQ/j4y/hpLfyU+X jc1C5KCoKodtBxoQXznKAG04f1rql+x4+s7hOgFds5qveujhiv/hlsucuufbYiEKvpQN WkoA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=aXV2pIyPuZF1uuu8uGEwSR/rRtmm3V7sXveJLw8k9ZY=; b=KaWBkpMBNnvYiB3/48aY0kS39aczm+THWCUK+bUx9xHBjhAaDwcbg7S2crTNMcMB4i UGgATq+Y6Zz3TbTW0tTjwYGNiZEsqqLedDzecGfBDi9L+aTQOTTYRPNAIXuwgktcS8P9 7riIFKHC53DpdVDHn8G3a89sDAKsTUUHuoDjgHTzj5FBbyZi+mBz+KNDdqO9E9/VpZX2 b6kl6UrJv6lIYu+3HUJEjGZQjXsKnB12k0VyUAuoN6gWY23kI5GAZO0xv9S29sm8YvB6 UpAMleCEqrFFSzPMV88QzygKdCksqraowkkq4fUDLFxHLSMIWcP2IWYaV4WDDg2ZBL+H DFYQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoousDDLFOZOSxqjAKfo40Ujj/MR35o65rhxcV0Yg1v0YbpKpqRf8YHB0m8OqTUCfva9RszwnYYmjpIwMAjw== X-Received: by 10.107.25.14 with SMTP id 14mr80486101ioz.168.1470444671554; Fri, 05 Aug 2016 17:51:11 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: kob6558@gmail.com Received: by 10.79.119.144 with HTTP; Fri, 5 Aug 2016 17:51:11 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <33ac70de-78b6-dc54-e81f-3153d0d721e4@FreeBSD.org> From: Kevin Oberman Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2016 17:51:11 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: r6mOkeRWv6_etafXmnMTm8nazvI Message-ID: Subject: Re: tiff vulnerability in ports? To: koobs@freebsd.org Cc: Mailinglists FreeBSD , FreeBSD Ports ML , alexmiroslav@gmail.com, FreeBSD Ports Security Team , Matthew Seaman X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 06 Aug 2016 02:29:58 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Aug 2016 00:51:12 -0000 On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 5:19 PM, Kevin Oberman wrote: > On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 8:43 AM, Kubilay Kocak wrote: > >> On 5/08/2016 11:35 PM, Matthew Seaman wrote: >> > On 2016/08/05 13:55, alphachi wrote: >> >> Please see this link to get more information: >> >> >> >> https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=revision&revision=418585 >> >> >> >> 2016-08-05 0:23 GMT+08:00 Aleksandr Miroslav : >> >> >> >>> This is perhaps a question for the tiff devs more than anything, but I >> >>> noticed that pkg audit has been complaining about libtiff >> (graphics/tiff) >> >>> for some time now. >> >>> >> >>> FreeBSD's VUXML database says anything before 4.0.7 is affected, but >> >>> apparently that version hasn't been released yet (according to >> >>> http://www.remotesensing.org/libtiff/, the latest stable release is >> still >> >>> 4.0.6). >> >>> >> >>> Anyone know what's going on? Is there a release upcoming to fix this? >> > >> > Yeah -- this vulnerability: >> > >> > https://vuxml.freebsd.org/freebsd/c17fe91d-4aa6-11e6-a7bd- >> 14dae9d210b8.html >> > >> > has been in VuXML since 2016-07-15 but there's no indication of a 4.0.7 >> > release from upstream yet. >> > >> > Given their approach to fixing the buffer overflow was to delete the >> > offending gif2tiff application from the package, perhaps we could simply >> > do the same until 4.0.7 comes out. >> > >> > Cheers, >> > >> > Matthew >> > >> > >> >> Hi Aleksandr :) >> >> Also: >> >> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211405 >> >> Please add a comment to that bug to request resolution of the issue. >> >> Alternatively you (and anyone else) can just delete gif2tiff >> >> Unfortunately you are yet one more example of a user that's been left in >> the lurch without information or recourse wondering (rightfully) how >> they can resolve or mitigate this vulnerability. Our apologies. >> >> > This one is really annoying in that it is so easily fixed. Just modify the > port to not build or even not install gif2tiff. It's not going to be fixed > upstream. At least the last message in the bugzilla indicates that the > program will simply be removed from 4.0.7 whenever it comes out. FreeBSD > should get out front and just delete it now. > > A fix is trivial, but touches 20 files and, of course, the plist. Guess I > should add it to the ticket. > Never mind. Mark Felder submitted it a week ago. If someone could look at it and commit? I'd also suggest a note to UPDATING that gif2tif is gone. -- Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer E-mail: rkoberman@gmail.com PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683 From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat Aug 6 04:06:58 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 425FFBB0050 for ; Sat, 6 Aug 2016 04:06:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from FreeBSD@shaneware.biz) Received: from ipmail06.adl6.internode.on.net (ipmail06.adl6.internode.on.net [150.101.137.145]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C693C1F17 for ; Sat, 6 Aug 2016 04:06:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from FreeBSD@shaneware.biz) Received: from ppp14-2-4-72.lns21.adl2.internode.on.net (HELO leader.local) ([14.2.4.72]) by ipmail06.adl6.internode.on.net with ESMTP; 06 Aug 2016 13:31:47 +0930 Subject: Re: game machine based on FreeBSD? To: Luca Ferrari , freebsd-questions References: From: Shane Ambler Message-ID: <57A56128.5080401@ShaneWare.Biz> Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2016 13:31:44 +0930 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Aug 2016 04:06:58 -0000 On 06/08/2016 02:21, Luca Ferrari wrote: > Hi all, > I'm just curious if there is any effort or possibility to build up a > FreeBSD gaming machine. Since I've seen SteamOS > I'm just curious to be able > to make a machine based on FreeBSD (and therefore use it also as a nas > thru ZFS). > Links and/or suggestions are welcome. Running steam via wine has been working for over a year. Not sure if anyone has had success in getting it running via linux compat. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B04EuZ9hpAI you can also set it up as a streaming client. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BJ88B8aWdk0 -- FreeBSD - the place to B...Software Developing Shane Ambler From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat Aug 6 07:14:17 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15C4EBB04B0 for ; Sat, 6 Aug 2016 07:14:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D1EEB1437 for ; Sat, 6 Aug 2016 07:14:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-102-47.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.102.47]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B08D27753; Sat, 6 Aug 2016 09:08:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id u7678Njh002068; Sat, 6 Aug 2016 09:08:23 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2016 09:08:23 +0200 From: Polytropon To: Andrew Merenbach Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: game machine based on FreeBSD? Message-Id: <20160806090823.79e424b1.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: Reply-To: Polytropon Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Aug 2016 07:14:17 -0000 Allow me a short addition: On Sat, 06 Aug 2016 00:49:38 +0000, Andrew Merenbach wrote: > On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 9:51 AM Luca Ferrari wrote: > > > I'm just curious if there is any effort or possibility to build up a > > FreeBSD gaming machine. Since I've seen SteamOS > > I'm just curious to be able > > to make a machine based on FreeBSD (and therefore use it also as a nas > > thru ZFS). > > Links and/or suggestions are welcome. > > > > > Hi Luca, > > While modern games lie mostly outside my experience with FreeBSD, "retro" > game players do have a large amount of flexibility, especially if they are > willing and able to install Wine and/or DOSBox. Some examples from my > experience, not all of which are of the same caliber: > > 1. Wine: Fallout 1 and 2, DOOM I and II, Quake II, Return to Castle > Wolfenstein, Unreal Gold (the original) DooM I and II have native ports for FreeBSD (you just need the WAD files), Quake I and II the same; RTCW has a Linux version that works well. No need for wine here. I'm using wine for Jedi Knight I and II. :-) (DooM III and Quake IV also have Linux versions that work on FreeBSD.) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat Aug 6 11:24:34 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69E75BB13E5 for ; Sat, 6 Aug 2016 11:24:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tomek.cedro@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wm0-x234.google.com (mail-wm0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F399C1147 for ; Sat, 6 Aug 2016 11:24:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tomek.cedro@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wm0-x234.google.com with SMTP id q128so58597369wma.1 for ; Sat, 06 Aug 2016 04:24:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=eIvkqzJmeLnH8GTWVh+sewRYZVGGuSv/QqOiPPSgg1o=; b=NkPjVkmUjBCekvcERFLjw32BoOr8bFxqE9AO9VQPzKmhxKexgbb5PlUYCdh1+5Yzrc NfOA+JNDbzHjCNmXlpuj6I8RKTnPzd/Szq0Rl2LmvwKdpcXMuQX27D/8wom5JHW4Uuqf cKu7km0ImKm1J1PcWxachix6P2vIqhv4SGA/tpS0UwAlew7QetjmGCDQt1PAF3hEoTEj 2nZnxbGmcBpIapsljKmWuS6DJ7yEnyxpZpa7eVVlImIUehkO4VWMUqW8BHKvp9P+AyvH v/WfPjrmUIuD+AS3z/b42sxBmCU7HxNKrqtBjZ8T6i1mRaNbZtDzWYyObqjCwaCXkNuV rwGg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=eIvkqzJmeLnH8GTWVh+sewRYZVGGuSv/QqOiPPSgg1o=; b=Krm4QQiMAcmBvvaPgNCyejUcwFp1FjFag4Vnt7QoMgDIOCixgGWL8DEfF+sbUOd6wj 9vzrfjk8up+HvLqdIPGmQq8kviXPUZTeKOnoeSCBOURQSicuBrRCFGuvcu2unTY8ijPL ha93PmvGvSsUfUthXaqyPJsGI1FXL8v1QwFKG/epb4HgAjccRPmW3iMjqlSt7MVw0tMO 8GmUbERCSrZ+YUCOLd1V4pieXvGlTfQ3PzpknOImsIOz43mT0IlEWxdvRbHjT4RvvHYI FxXhVgZUVOU53dgHnlyHyby1VzBs/x9z6C6h7BRAig7FclIoTQWxQ/1qr5jdawA38UvP zQoQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoouv+to5XbGWpOcgfGirAZryrvDQYaMyYTw7SVV9ZwzMECvh6S7S0pZAICFdnqrHgTtj5nY3NW6iw/km1bA== X-Received: by 10.194.145.103 with SMTP id st7mr75067581wjb.61.1470482672339; Sat, 06 Aug 2016 04:24:32 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: tomek.cedro@gmail.com Received: by 10.28.178.15 with HTTP; Sat, 6 Aug 2016 04:24:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.28.178.15 with HTTP; Sat, 6 Aug 2016 04:24:30 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: CeDeROM Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2016 13:24:30 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: ynK-byJSmeqXNNwDR7WEjpoLWHk Message-ID: Subject: Re: game machine based on FreeBSD? To: Luca Ferrari Cc: FreeBSD Questions Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Aug 2016 11:24:34 -0000 Playstation4 runs on FreeBSD :-) -- CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat Aug 6 03:39:14 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD9E4BAFB6F for ; Sat, 6 Aug 2016 03:39:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alphachi@mediaspirit.org) Received: from mail-vk0-x22c.google.com (mail-vk0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8AFE515C7 for ; Sat, 6 Aug 2016 03:39:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alphachi@mediaspirit.org) Received: by mail-vk0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id x130so205109264vkc.0 for ; Fri, 05 Aug 2016 20:39:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mediaspirit-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=HegvXbJASdU2r5Dsz1jYrrBmFyuInq6nDkhYS3QVpI0=; b=TWAILIRiWu61srStQwter/r6Yczw8+L33LYp936FRYkFyCYlESnCVFiWoMKRSQ8XQC ZcF/LFXLT0IzHYpQuCh9A9cUCWF+MAHQPpCARFhbieeYUPxtPjYZa+DmkgjaW1Eg1kdI 2Yi0BBOyqXMBuXmtcajWyv+XF3BrBwipbvyVr4UoOZfDky3L32SwmTqnPp6MKRJcKoCX WSMz8eGbsK5jlRJLGM3jAyUXQlymSWI1bd41IZDJGk8TXNi08G9pRgmTs8jMDzX13ZJw zirsd7ZkhKKJ32VZiDyNNkp3Df8WFlJyDwj3xJoO1MgWuUvotv3+sWDv7xGvhgK3ZM+7 iXaQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=HegvXbJASdU2r5Dsz1jYrrBmFyuInq6nDkhYS3QVpI0=; b=VD0ERlEp1+mBHAQc6XspRbSmzZhRH/GDOJ03Q0etrYBCVQ05O/8fk3qkVXGHAlUPsA iBMCXXK9Km2dRXxbj6pLx4EWB3T3MI4So7WLiKa7M3bwLcNwWu7i6Mx8gTekjajjAcgn x0Ebb4gTGeI3OjMyB9IKTWDrm2pzHh9RnF7YgT9pIBWrCKfoAE0LM27I7rSvYC6wzc5D 6AUeRpc5foNApMSOiBFctm6TYZSYcrXK30AtFzunkIG8hcBLlMc/scAtNpxpkBp64BvI fdXlDtXS9UXRHmwnRBN+ATAOkuUZD6P2vz0n8W/u11T22RAA/e68Q+zFw6PSaV2qstZ0 djBA== X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoouvRIO5K3SUhCZbRWj6bR8UWo5O3fQGscV2Z3BGBjnYY+X/+wk6mUNjxm01sqEDvWDvM8XLsOA5cKMxFHw== X-Received: by 10.31.47.141 with SMTP id v135mr573394vkv.109.1470454749991; Fri, 05 Aug 2016 20:39:09 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.31.77.7 with HTTP; Fri, 5 Aug 2016 20:39:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <33ac70de-78b6-dc54-e81f-3153d0d721e4@FreeBSD.org> From: alphachi Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2016 11:39:09 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: tiff vulnerability in ports? To: Kevin Oberman Cc: koobs@freebsd.org, Aleksandr Miroslav , FreeBSD Ports Security Team , Matthew Seaman , Mailinglists FreeBSD , FreeBSD Ports ML X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 06 Aug 2016 11:33:30 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Aug 2016 03:39:14 -0000 Any update doesn't still land on ports tree, but now "pkg audit -F" won't report graphics/tiff is vulnerable. 2016-08-06 8:51 GMT+08:00 Kevin Oberman : > On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 5:19 PM, Kevin Oberman wrote: > > > On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 8:43 AM, Kubilay Kocak wrote: > > > >> On 5/08/2016 11:35 PM, Matthew Seaman wrote: > >> > On 2016/08/05 13:55, alphachi wrote: > >> >> Please see this link to get more information: > >> >> > >> >> https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=revision&revision=418585 > >> >> > >> >> 2016-08-05 0:23 GMT+08:00 Aleksandr Miroslav >: > >> >> > >> >>> This is perhaps a question for the tiff devs more than anything, > but I > >> >>> noticed that pkg audit has been complaining about libtiff > >> (graphics/tiff) > >> >>> for some time now. > >> >>> > >> >>> FreeBSD's VUXML database says anything before 4.0.7 is affected, but > >> >>> apparently that version hasn't been released yet (according to > >> >>> http://www.remotesensing.org/libtiff/, the latest stable release is > >> still > >> >>> 4.0.6). > >> >>> > >> >>> Anyone know what's going on? Is there a release upcoming to fix > this? > >> > > >> > Yeah -- this vulnerability: > >> > > >> > https://vuxml.freebsd.org/freebsd/c17fe91d-4aa6-11e6-a7bd- > >> 14dae9d210b8.html > >> > > >> > has been in VuXML since 2016-07-15 but there's no indication of a > 4.0.7 > >> > release from upstream yet. > >> > > >> > Given their approach to fixing the buffer overflow was to delete the > >> > offending gif2tiff application from the package, perhaps we could > simply > >> > do the same until 4.0.7 comes out. > >> > > >> > Cheers, > >> > > >> > Matthew > >> > > >> > > >> > >> Hi Aleksandr :) > >> > >> Also: > >> > >> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211405 > >> > >> Please add a comment to that bug to request resolution of the issue. > >> > >> Alternatively you (and anyone else) can just delete gif2tiff > >> > >> Unfortunately you are yet one more example of a user that's been left in > >> the lurch without information or recourse wondering (rightfully) how > >> they can resolve or mitigate this vulnerability. Our apologies. > >> > >> > > This one is really annoying in that it is so easily fixed. Just modify > the > > port to not build or even not install gif2tiff. It's not going to be > fixed > > upstream. At least the last message in the bugzilla indicates that the > > program will simply be removed from 4.0.7 whenever it comes out. FreeBSD > > should get out front and just delete it now. > > > > A fix is trivial, but touches 20 files and, of course, the plist. Guess I > > should add it to the ticket. > > > > Never mind. Mark Felder submitted it a week ago. If someone could look at > it and commit? I'd also suggest a note to UPDATING that gif2tif is gone. > -- > Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer > E-mail: rkoberman@gmail.com > PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions- > unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- Paranoid in Sabbath ... From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat Aug 6 12:24:00 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A008BAEE44; Sat, 6 Aug 2016 12:24:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.2.117.100]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk", Issuer "infracaninophile.co.uk" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1530C1F90; Sat, 6 Aug 2016 12:23:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from liminal.local (liminal.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3636:3bff:fed4:b0d6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 58E418E90; Sat, 6 Aug 2016 12:23:49 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk; dmarc=none header.from=FreeBSD.org Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/58E418E90; dkim=none; dkim-atps=neutral Subject: Re: tiff vulnerability in ports? To: alphachi , Kevin Oberman References: <33ac70de-78b6-dc54-e81f-3153d0d721e4@FreeBSD.org> Cc: koobs@freebsd.org, Aleksandr Miroslav , FreeBSD Ports Security Team , Mailinglists FreeBSD , FreeBSD Ports ML From: Matthew Seaman Message-ID: Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2016 13:23:29 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="B6kfjgI0Gh3AiIsnbsuB3ExNwKnv5AOVi" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 06 Aug 2016 12:34:09 +0000 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Aug 2016 12:24:00 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --B6kfjgI0Gh3AiIsnbsuB3ExNwKnv5AOVi Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="L1WmsSUp9OGXBW6JE7vSTvqPGapfRMatU" From: Matthew Seaman To: alphachi , Kevin Oberman Cc: koobs@freebsd.org, Aleksandr Miroslav , FreeBSD Ports Security Team , Mailinglists FreeBSD , FreeBSD Ports ML Message-ID: Subject: Re: tiff vulnerability in ports? References: <33ac70de-78b6-dc54-e81f-3153d0d721e4@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: --L1WmsSUp9OGXBW6JE7vSTvqPGapfRMatU Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 06/08/2016 04:39, alphachi wrote: > Any update doesn't still land on ports tree, but now "pkg audit -F" won= 't > report graphics/tiff is vulnerable. There has been a revised judgement about the gif2tiff program, in that while it can be made to crash by a specially crafted gif file, that does not in itself constitute a security problem. This is not just the opinion of ports secteam, but concurs with, for example, the Debian security team. I don't know what the current thinking is about removing gif2tiff from the libtiff package, but libtiff is one of those packages which very many other packages depend upon, and portmgr consequently requires experimental package build runs and in general much more stringent levels of testing before allowing any such change. Cheers, Matthew --L1WmsSUp9OGXBW6JE7vSTvqPGapfRMatU-- --B6kfjgI0Gh3AiIsnbsuB3ExNwKnv5AOVi Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJXpdbIXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ2NTNBNjhCOTEzQTRFNkNGM0UxRTEzMjZC QjIzQUY1MThFMUE0MDEzAAoJELsjr1GOGkATfBgP/3soMUBXRFcEdBBLg76iBXwk HL5ROk4uy/Y7F501T5LEMQRtU47IW3PuWnVlHFl/ve6OVLi8KyCGZY5L2bNnV929 oImn8ck2chdhEu9guY2sWYDSk5B7ohFEHLzQLFTXwPwm1t3t7XQqCmg7lxSZgoDP xudzaFExONae93ivCGwZqSx7z7b4EvQetGy4KPkJPRpw0ovfVnX63oElzve5X3d5 sk2Ml04JFnk95wJHEByr9XMFTlW9Ok2NmywxicuesqfrF5Ug09c2rGBpo3sqRuN2 nJAqvSr1v0XhzP8PU5B9GLu54R8xqteXSo0Kif3mTG/N4mlriDL+4n76e9QpQB4B qidRyWptYe9GqCtg5K6gCtfbtuK8Hn0WHHr8M4BJxmjW2mvuyrcMKS4SvSIyib6p v7yqE9mULnS/kS1VDNyTS1yf2kFa4Kzn3A+wM38HO7iV7YBMVCdmUuqLkob9ZvJH 2obExoa3K1XpTBtbVHSzPy4btTHPSzpae8swb8cak5hxTnVSqTQ9cNSktrD+BuLo iAObiicy1oATBAObiQOCmWdQfWz3Gp1PnhXuE4Hq9OPMlaZ1yyNpnlFdlTBrzu8t yYLxBhAmUsTa55XNxVw4jiYNADOWcEf3bLtrYahiUwFVFPpkzLDNfUG/igVE3WGL erXw57akJMfw87Ii48uR =lQN+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --B6kfjgI0Gh3AiIsnbsuB3ExNwKnv5AOVi-- From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat Aug 6 12:51:25 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D872BAF628 for ; Sat, 6 Aug 2016 12:51:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cotuittim@hotmail.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08DF31E4F for ; Sat, 6 Aug 2016 12:51:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cotuittim@hotmail.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 08304BAF627; Sat, 6 Aug 2016 12:51:25 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07CEEBAF626 for ; Sat, 6 Aug 2016 12:51:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cotuittim@hotmail.com) Received: from BLU004-OMC4S1.hotmail.com (blu004-omc4s1.hotmail.com [65.55.111.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.outlook.com", Issuer "Microsoft IT SSL SHA2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD5A71E4D for ; Sat, 6 Aug 2016 12:51:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cotuittim@hotmail.com) Received: from BLU437-SMTP103 ([65.55.111.135]) by BLU004-OMC4S1.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.23008); Sat, 6 Aug 2016 05:50:17 -0700 X-TMN: [vesO7WVJ8GUqaOpNwxlcSDsy28snHUmK] X-Originating-Email: [cotuittim@hotmail.com] Message-ID: From: "Nationwide Online Banking " Subject: (Action Recuired): Update and confirm your Nationwide Online Banking To: questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2016 13:50:15 +0100 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 160805-0, 08/05/2016), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Aug 2016 12:50:14.0708 (UTC) FILETIME=[13AA8F40:01D1EFE1] Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Aug 2016 12:51:25 -0000 - This mail is in HTML. Some elements may be ommited in plain text. - Dear Customer, Please note that starting from August 6, 2016 we will be introducing n= ew online banking authentication procedures in order to protect the pr= ivate information of all online banking users. You are required to confirm your online banking details with us as you= will not be able to have access to your accounts until this has been = done. As you're already registered for online banking all you need to do is = to confirm your online banking details. Confirm your details If you haven't setup a mobile phone in your account, please contact Cu= stomer Support. Yours sincerely, Managing Director of Digital Protect yourself from fraud If you receive a telephone call asking you to use your card reader or = transfer your money to another account, you should hang up and ignore = the request. For more information on telephone scams and how to protect yourself fr= om fraud, please visit our security centre =2E. Use this link for our Internet Bank Terms and Conditions =2E. We use cookies on this site to deliver you a secure and efficient banking service. Always log out of Internet banking after you have finished. Virus-free. www.avast.com From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat Aug 6 12:59:23 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56254BAF787 for ; Sat, 6 Aug 2016 12:59:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nzp@riseup.net) Received: from mx1.riseup.net (mx1.riseup.net [198.252.153.129]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 311AF129C for ; Sat, 6 Aug 2016 12:59:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nzp@riseup.net) Received: from cotinga.riseup.net (unknown [10.0.1.164]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EA9891A1A64 for ; Sat, 6 Aug 2016 12:59:15 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak; t=1470488355; bh=8nn9rWqof8RVGnzB2SDFjCAJJ146CXeCxpyW6Q3QzUQ=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=W+BBhTFIPer2DtKNlRf9P2wHQoS09jZzTbTGt8QoPjxlzu2rUAxe/3UK2HkceB5aI ble1lmaKeErRFKqX7QDgum8IqSk1YEgb1lvaJ7qRzSq40/UVRzI9c7rkJ8rs/JW+MI +BUTGSAdy0ShbAj3lwTZRpz7G1rYCEXuW29IJsxE= Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (Authenticated sender: nzp) with ESMTPSA id 2704F40057 Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2016 14:59:09 +0200 From: Nikola =?UTF-8?B?UGF2bG92acSH?= To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: game machine based on FreeBSD? Message-ID: <20160806145909.48e4c329@riseup.net> In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.99.2 at mx1.riseup.net X-Virus-Status: Clean X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Aug 2016 12:59:23 -0000 On Sat, 06 Aug 2016 00:49:38 +0000 Andrew Merenbach wrote: > > I haven't tried early Warcraft games (Warcraft I, II, and III) but > I'd be willing to bet they could be run in a combination of DOSBox, > Wine, and/or emulation. > Blizzard's games usually run great on Wine. I haven't tried I and II but III worked without problems. And FWIW all of my WoW time ever was logged under Wine on FreeBSD (but I haven't tried since Cataclysim), also flawlessly as far as I can remember. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat Aug 6 13:25:20 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4F54BAFE23 for ; Sat, 6 Aug 2016 13:25:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steve@sohara.org) Received: from smtp3.irishbroadband.ie (smtp3.irishbroadband.ie [62.231.32.5]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F72F1F28 for ; Sat, 6 Aug 2016 13:25:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steve@sohara.org) Received: from [89.127.62.20] (helo=smtp.lan.sohara.org) by smtp3.irishbroadband.ie with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1bW1Fq-0001V8-Tg for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 06 Aug 2016 14:03:06 +0100 Received: from [192.168.63.1] (helo=steve.lan.sohara.org) by smtp.lan.sohara.org with smtp (Exim 4.86_2 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1bW1GA-000AQn-NP for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 06 Aug 2016 13:03:26 +0000 Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2016 14:03:06 +0100 From: Steve O'Hara-Smith To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: game machine based on FreeBSD? Message-Id: <20160806140306.bbd534544c5dc14c7d7c3317@sohara.org> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.5.0 (GTK+ 2.24.29; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.1) X-Clacks-Overhead: "GNU Terry Pratchett" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Aug 2016 13:25:20 -0000 On Sat, 6 Aug 2016 13:24:30 +0200 CeDeROM wrote: > Playstation4 runs on FreeBSD :-) I'll bet you can't get a FreeBSD PC to play any PS4 games though. -- Steve O'Hara-Smith From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat Aug 6 15:42:33 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A07ABB002F for ; Sat, 6 Aug 2016 15:42:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from luzar722@gmail.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 098C51149 for ; Sat, 6 Aug 2016 15:42:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from luzar722@gmail.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 08974BB002E; Sat, 6 Aug 2016 15:42:33 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05E57BB002C for ; Sat, 6 Aug 2016 15:42:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from luzar722@gmail.com) Received: from mail-io0-x22c.google.com (mail-io0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C6E011148 for ; Sat, 6 Aug 2016 15:42:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from luzar722@gmail.com) Received: by mail-io0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id b62so324532840iod.3 for ; Sat, 06 Aug 2016 08:42:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-transfer-encoding; bh=9X85nPk05GjT6glIox+pqtz01bQcIXyEd9/bIUdXr+k=; b=gYdRyvg8/0Gm0bq6mrwslj9ur+Fd16V6dcdPEZ6QHH9NYCKBH1MIqPsIzrlpQ5kOnm o8O4eOWVBzVU+fYiIpFyowMxUHqhoBo0AEMDWU3vyuzqljk6LRLinyCYIBqijgKNzkMd C8UptGdJC9YMAxHEdrhiviDvD49v+Q/mPUtw6U6kEwkV3FseVCrXefc3mBbtVWkMdpx7 5SMxt0tu+McKbhaOB4GbSVKV9dB1+v4902awFfdxjyelzjEzRqbWnfniNY0RkDC6Aak8 Xe6iqksmWQ6+/wAgXZkY1FEb2VfzyULu7YEWMbuZIsB6jtJH40ioctoI8naK5JJ0Ct3R o5Aw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:content-transfer-encoding; bh=9X85nPk05GjT6glIox+pqtz01bQcIXyEd9/bIUdXr+k=; b=gPpKto3KDfpo3a7AdYcQ/6ZErV6D8FpNKYkwbvNLuWIMESDFhP3edkSrvzI2uT2eta W+v8ahXW0abKk6+tXPmQgo8BABQLOXGIrQ0FVPRfEf9ZqU8LkQ67QhpVG49st2+evISH tLiJcfLbep2XwYNA7wkAqPvEy2ZHDSVl8zZrKtBsnjwTIHyktLWNL70WHeY4e5Er3Mo1 5WhOaetWFwp01FF54OKpuZ3gsQPZBPRMrHz2HUlhhZlUpDTui9v9Hetgrh8xy30ZFxw3 FNXKHjocfk/NhrYuayAvmFyZxfJeZUHc47sol5z3CeCN7mctEovEL/XTC+ZVFMajNYuw NBUw== X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoouuqGq0A8rPP/RSdCwJ/b5ZPefjYqV828HkgHZHc06bnWBN7p4Xxq902JlAhOqstEg== X-Received: by 10.107.201.138 with SMTP id z132mr88220789iof.156.1470498151562; Sat, 06 Aug 2016 08:42:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.0.10.3] (cpe-24-165-196-54.neo.res.rr.com. [24.165.196.54]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id o15sm7893660ith.2.2016.08.06.08.42.30 for (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 06 Aug 2016 08:42:31 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <57A6056E.6030604@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 06 Aug 2016 11:42:38 -0400 From: Ernie Luzar User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions Subject: dead url in ipfilter doc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Aug 2016 15:42:33 -0000 Hello list; Was looking in /usr/src/share/examples/ipfilter/README and it contains 2 dead URLs http://www.obfuscation.org/ipf/ http://coombs.anu.edu.au/~avalon/ Since that path is part of the base system, don't know who should be informed to repair this. Pointers welcomed. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat Aug 6 15:45:24 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4418DBB0185 for ; Sat, 6 Aug 2016 15:45:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fernando.apesteguia@gmail.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2135712E4 for ; Sat, 6 Aug 2016 15:45:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fernando.apesteguia@gmail.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 20820BB0181; Sat, 6 Aug 2016 15:45:24 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 202C5BB017F for ; Sat, 6 Aug 2016 15:45:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fernando.apesteguia@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lf0-x232.google.com (mail-lf0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 96C2112E1 for ; Sat, 6 Aug 2016 15:45:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fernando.apesteguia@gmail.com) Received: by mail-lf0-x232.google.com with SMTP id b199so222089838lfe.0 for ; Sat, 06 Aug 2016 08:45:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=hbFjgmHtu0KjeBctV750VwUvmYS+AmCMvm04JSIfKcs=; b=sx58P13Sp/9obYA9FLSdjKyPoBWSoKOifTz41/pu7Fd7/BkiqyRlICgwHGah9oGlVZ 0dAVPAwCvV2mJSFiheIWQoe58JMXPQdtzlEVSSQVSuFUu9oR0s8vmMigAPmLJXv64wEx xTvT7KZCslDNpuiaSQyL251nzOgO9nUr4+yx7Hyrbe4BdkK2oFWaDBC5eznNAxNrJYKy 1QuC4rqEfWJAPZ227x+Ba4iyZba/hw04jK4sxDdewzeiZu4AnbLCqdoXVNDxv/EzlLaZ erZgOlA8W7KdIyUxTasR1woxR4gIHAHlGOFghxRqZDpOK/mvFVfoiyD/4Z17GqWIYHST akJA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=hbFjgmHtu0KjeBctV750VwUvmYS+AmCMvm04JSIfKcs=; b=cYpHnATitbrsVbMS1ZJ5se8wY+StMESLaDsFjC4FTqPJrp9X6WSC5XU4A7gBwV+g0+ MofaBEylDC5IcAQPVjV5bsK51gazxslL1dy8Ltdr+FcYKAPsFV031lBjzzFQAYoIwubV 8Ub9ai1gszAJFWJ1JEkLtSHEaMcSoo/foidVggh2+iibx3fi4uZgQh3xjeb6xBbSCnD1 OfhcCjSvvQsS7CEct9dnj9LDsXn4zvY+VTYvOsPgS4oGLVPDLHz50mx9Bhn32A0cyeZl e6EhpjkpSb0z9GGOnIo0v7bm3GeTUMtHblNMF8bxVumNrsTLppi0uj7JBaB8czWLEkjQ 7ztQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoouvC5jVdiUrOrccg5gT/ainjGl1GOLeBZhJZzaPsrPs1k9Flw2Z4+1qoNHaiStWYEWRAGNWcq5JnpNHzJQ== X-Received: by 10.46.1.222 with SMTP id f91mr24679199lji.1.1470498321678; Sat, 06 Aug 2016 08:45:21 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.25.150.16 with HTTP; Sat, 6 Aug 2016 08:45:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.25.150.16 with HTTP; Sat, 6 Aug 2016 08:45:19 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <57A6056E.6030604@gmail.com> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Fernando_Apestegu=C3=ADa?= Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2016 17:45:19 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: dead url in ipfilter doc To: Ernie Luzar Cc: questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Aug 2016 15:45:24 -0000 El 6/8/2016 17:42, "Ernie Luzar" escribi=C3=B3: > > Hello list; > > Was looking in /usr/src/share/examples/ipfilter/README > > and it contains 2 dead URLs > > http://www.obfuscation.org/ipf/ > > http://coombs.anu.edu.au/~avalon/ > > Since that path is part of the base system, don't know who should be informed to repair this. > > Pointers welcomed. Sending a PR would be a good idea. If you can come up with a patch to update the URLs, even better. Cheers. > > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat Aug 6 15:54:39 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C43EEBB065C; Sat, 6 Aug 2016 15:54:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stdin@niklaas.eu) Received: from mx.box-hlm-01.niklaas.eu (mx.box-hlm-01.niklaas.eu [84.22.107.79]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9529F181C; Sat, 6 Aug 2016 15:54:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stdin@niklaas.eu) Received: from len-t420.klaas (unknown [IPv6:2a02:908:d722:7b00:224:d7ff:feec:38e0]) by mx.box-hlm-01.niklaas.eu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7C30D2C3592; Sat, 6 Aug 2016 17:54:17 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2016 17:54:11 +0200 From: Niklaas Baudet von Gersdorff To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Subject: Firewalling jails and lo0 Message-ID: <20160806155411.GA5289@len-t420.klaas> Reply-To: stdin@niklaas.eu Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-pf@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.0 (2016-04-01) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Aug 2016 15:54:39 -0000 Hi, In the manual I read the advice to disable the firewall on the loopback interface (`set skip on lo0`) It makes sense to me: Why would I want to firewall traffic on the loopback interface? I have jails with IPs assigned on lo1. Intentionally I do /not/ `set skip on lo1` because I also want to restrict traffic (in and out) from and to the jails. (In case one of them becomes infiltrated.) However, today I realised that some connections originating from these jails use the loopback interface lo0. That said, they "circumvent" the firewall I set on lo1. `tcpdump` shows connections on lo0 from and to jails' IPs (especially IPv6s) although these IPs are solely assigned to lo1. I was quite surprised by that behaviour. So, if I want to isolate the jails and restrict traffic from an to them, will I need to remove skipping on lo0 and block there too? Any advice and explanation is very much appreciated. Niklaas From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat Aug 6 16:15:20 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26DABBB0B59; Sat, 6 Aug 2016 16:15:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from luzar722@gmail.com) Received: from mail-it0-x22b.google.com (mail-it0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E3D0312CC; Sat, 6 Aug 2016 16:15:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from luzar722@gmail.com) Received: by mail-it0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id u186so44623054ita.0; Sat, 06 Aug 2016 09:15:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=qCDhhAGGUSjvEGITF78spxp0IWR6fQoLVuuSpjuaMQw=; b=aR17PTC0frMbXxeR91PvWIy3VIphdDbYlx1bcVYa2MIYGdtI5vzE1sPf0ttBs4rPyh 2yx0LB9DUpPHQk+XpT14UzjaWfIZoTA7l6lOO7wx7QmH67gpX/q5nKOPCim0C3PBAryt kLeqcPXyi1ZChdn086EZaLF+O2Z195sRWiK1DP6bjQzNkEqNzinQsHkKEO9KPIHvrUP4 Ayk15Zz/yzwo1OlIvssBYk+0tf2M4cMZsgG6aOnPSs4bW3m5B5naFLsv0PB/z0SDivNI EPmPb9W3VgxJjbJyPU0GhZ0qTqKxA9H//DPDbyv680k5C25D/NLGnKypxYWUQ7dtj8mJ J+7Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=qCDhhAGGUSjvEGITF78spxp0IWR6fQoLVuuSpjuaMQw=; b=GqwSheVKbsXVFo5z2A+oTQyC+eWwYjDTI4WQcd/0uoUfOOlHwau+wRwvEuovWWuQvm tvzRKx8JaLdZ37gdocVJp14726afNEeGs+qA1OA/mqnK1WqgnrPz5G7AS5UKsV76Hta+ A3+FE6A+oOgWVkvMg5eUf4eEyNh+TSqWls2ofr+c2rDEXtH70Dd/raWf2N7c1+VvmuHT BivC/Dokm7266b0g8a+S1M5bWlFBhn1cQcuwR3Cd2p/kHJ3btmLnlm03HqtNGqiaXcMt i7no1BdSCVs0xc53jFCLbST4YkDXmQS+35BlsmhPd/AaeZtIG7xWVkD81cRi2Ssi6WFM avVA== X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoouvRQ4dwb+R4iwFZ2Xui4fo6McWQhWwtANO8W7/ro7mKqLlju6chZNJI1HyOdv8uVQ== X-Received: by 10.36.31.149 with SMTP id d143mr10396671itd.87.1470500119146; Sat, 06 Aug 2016 09:15:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.0.10.3] (cpe-24-165-196-54.neo.res.rr.com. [24.165.196.54]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id w138sm6283521itc.8.2016.08.06.09.15.18 (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 06 Aug 2016 09:15:18 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <57A60D1F.80500@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 06 Aug 2016 12:15:27 -0400 From: Ernie Luzar User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-pf@freebsd.org CC: stdin@niklaas.eu Subject: Re: Firewalling jails and lo0 References: <20160806155411.GA5289@len-t420.klaas> In-Reply-To: <20160806155411.GA5289@len-t420.klaas> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Aug 2016 16:15:20 -0000 Niklaas Baudet von Gersdorff wrote: > Hi, > > In the manual I read the advice to disable the firewall on the > loopback interface (`set skip on lo0`) It makes sense to me: Why > would I want to firewall traffic on the loopback interface? > > I have jails with IPs assigned on lo1. Intentionally I do /not/ > `set skip on lo1` because I also want to restrict traffic (in and > out) from and to the jails. (In case one of them becomes > infiltrated.) > > However, today I realized that some connections originating from > these jails use the loopback interface lo0. That said, they > "circumvent" the firewall I set on lo1. `tcpdump` shows > connections on lo0 from and to jails' IPs (especially IPv6s) > although these IPs are solely assigned to lo1. > > I was quite surprised by that behavior. So, if I want to isolate > the jails and restrict traffic from an to them, will I need to > remove skipping on lo0 and block there too? > > Any advice and explanation is very much appreciated. > > Niklaas This bug report will answer your questions for non-vimage jails. https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210049 From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat Aug 6 16:24:11 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 565D9BB0DCE; Sat, 6 Aug 2016 16:24:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stdin@niklaas.eu) Received: from mx.box-hlm-01.niklaas.eu (mx.box-hlm-01.niklaas.eu [IPv6:2a02:2770:15:0:21a:4aff:fe1b:d1ad]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2776E173A; Sat, 6 Aug 2016 16:24:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stdin@niklaas.eu) Received: from len-t420.klaas (unknown [IPv6:2a02:908:d722:7b00:224:d7ff:feec:38e0]) by mx.box-hlm-01.niklaas.eu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 00A1C2C3592; Sat, 6 Aug 2016 18:23:48 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2016 18:23:43 +0200 From: Niklaas Baudet von Gersdorff To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Firewalling jails and lo0 Message-ID: <20160806162343.GE5566@len-t420.klaas> Reply-To: stdin@niklaas.eu Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-pf@freebsd.org References: <20160806155411.GA5289@len-t420.klaas> <57A60D1F.80500@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <57A60D1F.80500@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.0 (2016-04-01) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Aug 2016 16:24:11 -0000 Ernie Luzar [2016-08-06 12:15 -0400] : > > This bug report will answer your questions for non-vimage jails. > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210049 Thanks a lot. So I stumbled upon a security issue? And the only way to work around this is by using vimage jails? While vimage refers to some virtualisation of the network /within/ the jails? Niklaas From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat Aug 6 16:54:51 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0C3ABB0447; Sat, 6 Aug 2016 16:54:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from luzar722@gmail.com) Received: from mail-io0-x235.google.com (mail-io0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A98D81462; Sat, 6 Aug 2016 16:54:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from luzar722@gmail.com) Received: by mail-io0-x235.google.com with SMTP id m101so325253084ioi.2; Sat, 06 Aug 2016 09:54:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=KwKHLH+GxN02OAAgvbq3a0SH2/p2UZwLyD8Jv5y2EVw=; b=EHewpkmsFYChqKM+5elNRQlGwJJX/H2lAOSrnBfE8U/uyRuHj/4qOsaDqRG6yrzf7J M5UuKS8OHkQYFURoMu1qVZkWObNnOCmjXcWzAxpqRs5/xsRjFX14iyp5W2BCqJE4QodK xugdH3+hHORq0swn+o9TOPOycrYG+zviM0761upRjHwpQgWyHM78o2eREilT02XG2/z/ 2vDsZDNfySqSILUc/vQ4LQcgABKoyPm5PDm0cp5X522dzWvTE7lOxkXWczvyalS3U0E6 pZW7eU66UP45V2Z7M7Msg60x18k5GasFypMbl9xINot16p+36t0TTkecsso0BLZQPKV6 XwBA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=KwKHLH+GxN02OAAgvbq3a0SH2/p2UZwLyD8Jv5y2EVw=; b=BL9n8zqv+xsBp8BqlXFkwGsu8Fh7N3Tf8Ei/kUyZioS2dgypmXZf4QTskxzDPo3yUd V2waM8GK21jr57AGr8a0uPHDntJUA3XBXC08aUa9SfIpLhV+nNA2DY0mGe5U/fmK6BBy OdDOmohpTGmzI1lxkp+/s+RpSRtXaobVI4svKrqP9PeEEH+Un9bVQ67dc3JeyXdJ3paY eI8Fkqo7VSOIuMi+GwWM0ELg0/e4ZydO3Nta8gOOKzLEFGZjhXVkTsfp7pO930ZCCd2d ehigGi6xpfJFWtL73MSicTmlggjh06EvlF6IT1yPMTTJSegn5SlnYNCiV67ltHWIJoYF TyCw== X-Gm-Message-State: AEkooutF5Jfqx3JydBNzk+pmeejf0/dmGh9Rklp81Xt8CkpObAKeRGj1/faUAjG8xf2Y+A== X-Received: by 10.107.128.200 with SMTP id k69mr101869274ioi.65.1470502490872; Sat, 06 Aug 2016 09:54:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.0.10.3] (cpe-24-165-196-54.neo.res.rr.com. [24.165.196.54]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id b66sm5974719itd.0.2016.08.06.09.54.49 (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 06 Aug 2016 09:54:50 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <57A61664.9010100@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 06 Aug 2016 12:55:00 -0400 From: Ernie Luzar User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-pf@freebsd.org, stdin@niklaas.eu Subject: Re: Firewalling jails and lo0 References: <20160806155411.GA5289@len-t420.klaas> <57A60D1F.80500@gmail.com> <20160806162343.GE5566@len-t420.klaas> In-Reply-To: <20160806162343.GE5566@len-t420.klaas> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Aug 2016 16:54:52 -0000 Niklaas Baudet von Gersdorff wrote: > Ernie Luzar [2016-08-06 12:15 -0400] : > >> This bug report will answer your questions for non-vimage jails. >> >> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210049 > > Thanks a lot. So I stumbled upon a security issue? And the only > way to work around this is by using vimage jails? While vimage > refers to some virtualisation of the network /within/ the jails? > > Niklaas That is not the un-documented work around solution contained in the PR. Vimage jails are not mentioned at all. The loopback problem is isolated to non-vimage jails only. If your non-vimage jail does not contain a application that uses local host lo0/127.0.0.x then you don't need to do anything. If there is an application in your jail that uses lo0/127.0.0.x, then for that jails jail.conf definition you have to manually activate loopback by adding lo0:127.0.0.x to the jails ip4_addr parameter value alone with the jails primary IP address. Then manually change the conf file of all the applications running in that jail to use that lo0 127.0.0.x IP address. Or an alternate is to add a statement to the hosts rc.conf to clone the lo0 interface and them code as above. This means each jail has a unique loopback ip address. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat Aug 6 18:38:58 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06A1BBB0355 for ; Sat, 6 Aug 2016 18:38:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tyler@tysdomain.com) Received: from tds-solutions.net (tds-solutions.net [174.136.96.202]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E83231A36 for ; Sat, 6 Aug 2016 18:38:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tyler@tysdomain.com) Received: from tds-solutions.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tds-solutions.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 091962087A75 for ; Sat, 6 Aug 2016 14:32:46 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at tds-solutions.net Received: from tds-solutions.net ([127.0.0.1]) by tds-solutions.net (tds-solutions.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id kaLgcYDtMDt7 for ; Sat, 6 Aug 2016 14:32:45 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [192.168.88.253] (c-24-147-10-153.hsd1.ma.comcast.net [24.147.10.153]) (Authenticated sender: sorressean) by tds-solutions.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 73DEE2087A3C for ; Sat, 6 Aug 2016 14:32:45 -0400 (EDT) Reply-To: tyler@tysdomain.com To: FreeBSD Questions From: "Littlefield, Tyler" Subject: pf: rdr with two interfaces Message-ID: <9dc95fb0-737b-67d8-c6f7-7d7cbd402e72@tysdomain.com> Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2016 14:34:57 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Aug 2016 18:38:58 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 All, I'm attempting to set up two interfaces on different networks. I can connect to ports 22 and 53, but I cannot connect to any of the samba ports. Prior to the introduction of two interfaces this worked fine. Is there a problem with this setup? If so, any tips/etc would be great. also any thoughts on cleaning up these rules to look better/be more efficient would also be helpful. Thanks, if="bridge0" eif="igb1" addr="192.168.88.200" eaddr="10.21.96.200" samba_addr="192.168.0.2" #port groupings tcp_services="{4000 53 netbios-ns netbios-dgm netbios-ssn microsoft-ds 22}" etcp_services="{netbios-ns netbios-dgm netbios-ssn microsoft-ds 22}" udp_services="{53 netbios-ns netbios-dgm netbios-ssn microsoft-ds}" eudp_services="{netbios-ns netbios-dgm netbios-ssn microsoft-ds}" samba_services="{netbios-dgm netbios-ns netbios-ssn microsoft-ds}" set skip on lo set loginterface $if scrub in all #allow jails through #samba nat on $if inet from $samba_addr to any tag jail_samba -> $addr #portforward to jails. #samba rdr pass proto tcp from any to any port $samba_services -> $samba_addr rdr pass proto udp from any to any port $samba_services -> $samba_addr #rdr pass on $eif proto tcp from any to any port $samba_services -> $samba_addr #rdr pass on $eif proto udp from any to any port $samba_services -> $samba_addr #rules pass quick on lo1 pass from $if to any keep state pass from $eif to any keep state #default policy: deny block in log all antispoof quick for { $if $eif lo } #accept TCP ports. pass in on $if proto tcp from any to any port $tcp_services pass in on $eif proto tcp from any to any port $etcp_services pass in on $if proto udp from any to any port $udp_services pass in on $eif proto udp from any to any port $eudp_services - -- Take care, Ty Twitter: @sorressean Web: https://tysdomain.com Pubkey: https://tysdomain.com/files/pubkey.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJXpi3RAAoJEAdP60+BYxejbPMH/0NNyACtbljoqdt+pGczrWDV HJQiBjfGe8/XxDIml6MJu3/NmO+G54ZICidvFdkolTIVDxjzfe9dRvynwGlcR68e HkEfsWsQ464gTjmJLYeOONP/WJI6q+zuzqucB6E6HG+4Yh0/C1d8cUAiME2FAPsn KURFa4a4t110A1yGtF5hRyAAfjKtZ6QOWK5TwfUVI7BVmuGGdu/ElTrtO/7klzPy Ot2B0g7Nlp75m3uKIVthJd3Qtw1V1FmfXMa2H7/96R0FRxmtLyGIDsUrWA/m2TiT WXMfPCmByzD2e+AbtMeFilp+HYOqhWJW5cYla/dGKWns7OQSpy4OZmEJsWm2K5g= =xEii -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat Aug 6 20:02:53 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F51CBB17EA; Sat, 6 Aug 2016 20:02:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net) Received: from mx1.sbone.de (bird.sbone.de [46.4.1.90]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx1.sbone.de", Issuer "SBone.DE" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 22133152B; Sat, 6 Aug 2016 20:02:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net) Received: from mail.sbone.de (mail.sbone.de [IPv6:fde9:577b:c1a9:31::2013:587]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.sbone.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C203525D387C; Sat, 6 Aug 2016 20:02:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from content-filter.sbone.de (content-filter.sbone.de [IPv6:fde9:577b:c1a9:31::2013:2742]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.sbone.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B01A4D1F7E4; Sat, 6 Aug 2016 20:02:41 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at sbone.de Received: from mail.sbone.de ([IPv6:fde9:577b:c1a9:31::2013:587]) by content-filter.sbone.de (content-filter.sbone.de [fde9:577b:c1a9:31::2013:2742]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oxKQqsQVS6P2; Sat, 6 Aug 2016 20:02:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.111.64.116] (unknown [IPv6:fde9:577b:c1a9:4410:500c:ee72:e712:5af8]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.sbone.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BD7FAD1F7E3; Sat, 6 Aug 2016 20:02:39 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" To: "Niklaas Baudet von Gersdorff" Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Firewalling jails and lo0 Date: Sat, 06 Aug 2016 20:02:37 +0000 Message-ID: <3C1C4822-17C2-42D9-A9BE-C3549B9B6F25@lists.zabbadoz.net> In-Reply-To: <20160806155411.GA5289@len-t420.klaas> References: <20160806155411.GA5289@len-t420.klaas> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailer: MailMate (2.0BETAr6043) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Aug 2016 20:02:53 -0000 On 6 Aug 2016, at 15:54, Niklaas Baudet von Gersdorff wrote: > Hi, > > In the manual I read the advice to disable the firewall on the > loopback interface (`set skip on lo0`) It makes sense to me: Why > would I want to firewall traffic on the loopback interface? > > I have jails with IPs assigned on lo1. Intentionally I do /not/ > `set skip on lo1` because I also want to restrict traffic (in and > out) from and to the jails. (In case one of them becomes > infiltrated.) > > However, today I realised that some connections originating from > these jails use the loopback interface lo0. That said, they > "circumvent" the firewall I set on lo1. `tcpdump` shows > connections on lo0 from and to jails' IPs (especially IPv6s) > although these IPs are solely assigned to lo1. I am curious about this. Can you give me an (obfuscated) example? (if you want in private email) Are these ::1 connections, link-local addresses (unlikely as they should not be visible to jails), or full IP? And what’s the routing table entry in the base system for them? Also do these jails have multiple IP address per-address family, and especially, do they have any IP address assigned to lo0 in them at all? From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat Aug 6 20:16:22 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E8DEBB1C2C for ; Sat, 6 Aug 2016 20:16:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yuri@rawbw.com) Received: from shell1.rawbw.com (shell1.rawbw.com [198.144.192.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EFCE1C36 for ; Sat, 6 Aug 2016 20:16:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yuri@rawbw.com) Received: from yuri.doctorlan.com (c-24-5-143-190.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [24.5.143.190]) (authenticated bits=0) by shell1.rawbw.com (8.15.1/8.15.1) with ESMTPSA id u76KGECk009490 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Sat, 6 Aug 2016 13:16:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from yuri@rawbw.com) X-Authentication-Warning: shell1.rawbw.com: Host c-24-5-143-190.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [24.5.143.190] claimed to be yuri.doctorlan.com Subject: Re: Any way to cache large /etc/hosts files? To: FreeBSD - References: <00938E41-D041-48E6-A561-24AC721D0C42@mac.com> From: Yuri Message-ID: <67d4a340-30b2-d720-fb54-afa36931a3c5@rawbw.com> Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2016 13:16:13 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <00938E41-D041-48E6-A561-24AC721D0C42@mac.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Aug 2016 20:16:22 -0000 On 08/05/2016 11:45, Charles Swiger wrote: > > Take a look into DNS RPZ, aka DNS blacklisting (the common use case): > > https://dnsrpz.info > > Recent versions of ISC BIND support this.... Charles, Thanks for the DNS RPZ reference, it should work. However, a simpler solution along the lines of nsswitch.conf/nscd could also be of value. It is be possible to create a program that would load the list of "bad" domains directly into nscd. However, it looks like /var/run/nscd socket is only accessible through the private functions in libc. I couldn't find any python binding for example. Maybe it makes sense to create such binding. Yuri From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat Aug 6 20:16:33 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AB6BBB1C54 for ; Sat, 6 Aug 2016 20:16:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from un_x@Safe-mail.net) Received: from orange.safe-mail.net (orange.safe-mail.net [212.29.227.81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 143731CA5 for ; Sat, 6 Aug 2016 20:16:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from un_x@Safe-mail.net) Received: by orange.safe-mail.net with Safe-mail (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1bVx4A-00081J-IT for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 06 Aug 2016 04:34:46 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=N1-0105; d=Safe-mail.net; b=c39KJ2g4K023Xt2tIHB9irjaho45R88hJ1kotddsqWZzlrCHcWmdw5+fjTgfmsPp GueLujv/vhSJXONlCK4k6w2gwr0nODJlbpP6uXNkoeiAdDy/3JrqnZLkwBpHXtpZ vquBMJP29iouJNOMiJIgTq1ZA14r0HJxuKNinSMSiTI=; Received: from pc ([72.251.118.217]) by Safe-mail.net with https Subject: FreeBSD and TTY Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2016 00:34:45 -0800 From: un_x@Safe-mail.net To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-SMType: Regular X-SMRef: N1O-7a1HTuy_S2 Message-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SMSignature: jZtG8attNxduSmOxV81KALarVTr53ZnOIVwszBUhrcDe1wF/+qIg/IuXHk1M6BHu 1bPJYFrAe0r562jec64dSBcLdkKh8am8zitvuU3L2a634WkwzoTa1YrBl8wZwwIo bprCdEtypWuvDQK1xQ04AdN9j2c957Xh2BnS9N1riY0= X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Aug 2016 20:16:33 -0000 I suffered a stroke a while back, and one of the effects was that it impaired my speech to the point where all of these automated answering services cannot understand my answers to their questions. Even simple yes/no or numbers or whatever they ask. And I see that many have TTY numbers for deaf people, and I'm not deaf, but I was thinking maybe I could make use of them. Does anyone know if 'cu(1)' can be used? I do have a normal 33.6 modem connected to a phone line, and I tried to research and study to find out how this may be possible, but I couldn't find clear and definitive information, but it did seem like TTY is just a normal dialup connection with a very slow baud rate. I guess they also have special TTY machines, but that is beyond my immediate ability; without getting into too many details. If anyone can help, thanks! From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat Aug 6 20:50:25 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E914DBB1621 for ; Sat, 6 Aug 2016 20:50:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wodfer@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wm0-x22a.google.com (mail-wm0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 763371E00 for ; Sat, 6 Aug 2016 20:50:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wodfer@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wm0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id o80so80117869wme.1 for ; Sat, 06 Aug 2016 13:50:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=XZeP8bgFGwn87hiW9y1etuOTNXpB8TcFiZmBvahGDCk=; b=iSaZQ3cxTvHRrBmT9hXYh8O8eFL0ey+UcAuh8bTKR2npw5Z1tta7QO5E7IzQx6LfHD 3u/Il2U0QJwadyswdbF4w/+KEW39Esg0pzlRxKkyXpcEaYjLwkHHWo2Edc5zBdnqnHOf mGZ+k2T49CIWWJQ0U4Q+nlQZ8efWKblp1XFMAEBhJ8DlCuQLN/E9ONv0oqKlRs6cdjSs CMestAkHKv8wigqgXcRflxh3zdmDOwOwipY/g8uDkONLPjhZeVJyegnyyHPRXYAYVoxK vTPfxxQyA7YZAgejbA0gnNK9TOy/UKIZaOPWQTBUkR0q4h09vBdVxHOELakQ0WMWtnjc SGNA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=XZeP8bgFGwn87hiW9y1etuOTNXpB8TcFiZmBvahGDCk=; b=ZtrzM00ZU5KgoxDZqD1Iu/AxAGl1qdIGRZoXhAhZRx/lJHPX1z8Uv/XZ8h25Rb8BZc ksJFJJpfEN60T+ldaZZ5L1WKOgvCymuXcZso/MhcZ+l8GDyRwZ+aful6+mE76VPPxb1g K7xrWdcQEgADXh+ya8ANloZu7R5cHgTYMVKlyv8sjiP90uo09XWKHoayZNV2PR66CTaT iUcD2uuPyuY8MMUkWxY7RIy4BaF87bw7/BbzJD8UKOg6mTgg5ql0AkDqJPFbtfCcALaG lbdQ9/TZuGxtWOSmlNZjHSAax1ZGNeUpkPmpke5MIoEG0XSOY0P64C/amHZ6RBW6RxJx 6kkQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoouuF6WslmisF2IoZm+0cYc5l1ABjj6dkT1DbYDsdHbqxctgrqbVvbrDvc+QRvYp/Jdo9/1IVs7PZEONVgw== X-Received: by 10.28.232.149 with SMTP id f21mr8484901wmi.51.1470516623615; Sat, 06 Aug 2016 13:50:23 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.28.165.150 with HTTP; Sat, 6 Aug 2016 13:50:22 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20160421171200.GA967@SeanLaptop> From: Andy Wodfer Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2016 22:50:22 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: php7 and pecl-pdflib fails To: freebsd-questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Aug 2016 20:50:26 -0000 Anyone? How can we have PDF support under PHP7? Is there another way I can get this working without using the broken php7-extension PDF? Thanks, Andy On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 9:48 AM, Andy Wodfer wrote: > Hi Sean and the rest of the FreeBSD list, > > Today I stumbled upon this issue again. I needed to install php7 with the > pdf extension to be able to create PDF files from a form generator. Still, > I see the pecl-pdflib hasn't been updated for a long time and not > compatible with php7. > > Any chance you or someone else could look into this? I think it makes no > sense to have a list of build options for php70-extensions where some are > not compatible with php7. :-) Also the ability to create PDF files through > php is for several of our sites very important. I'm not the only one I > think who needs this functionality. > > Would appreciate any feedback. > > Btw: Is there any way around this for me? Downgrading php is unfortunately > not an option on this server. Are people using some other solution for this? > > Cheers, > Andy > > On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 3:14 PM, Andy Wodfer wrote: > >> Hi Sean, >> >> I skipped it in the install here, so I don't really need it for now, but >> there are probably others who do so if you're up for it - go for it! :-) >> >> Best, >> Andy >> >> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 7:12 PM, Sean DuBois wrote: >> >>> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 04:21:54PM +0200, Andy Wodfer wrote: >>> > Hi, >>> > I recently upgraded to 10.3 REL on a test server. I'm trying to >>> install all >>> > the latest versions for Apache, mysql, php and so on. >>> > >>> > php7 is installed and works perfectly with apache. However, I couldn't >>> > install the extension pecl-pdflib from the php7 extensions port, it >>> fails >>> > with the message doesn't supprt php7. >>> > >>> > ===> phpMyAdmin-4.6.0 depends on file: >>> > /usr/local/lib/php/20151012/openssl.so - found >>> > ===> Returning to build of phpMyAdmin-4.6.0 >>> > ===> phpMyAdmin-4.6.0 depends on file: /usr/local/lib/php/20151012/pd >>> f.so >>> > - not found >>> > ===> pecl-pdflib-3.0.4 cannot be installed: doesn't work with >>> lang/php70 >>> > port (doesn't support PHP 70). >>> > *** Error code 1 >>> > >>> > Stop. >>> > make[2]: stopped in /usr/ports/print/pecl-pdflib >>> > *** Error code 1 >>> > >>> > Stop. >>> > make[1]: stopped in /usr/ports/databases/phpmyadmin >>> > *** Error code 1 >>> > >>> > Stop. >>> > make: stopped in /usr/ports/databases/phpmyadmin >>> > >>> > Does this mean I can't install phpmyadmin for now or is there a way >>> around >>> > this? pecl-pdflib hasn't been updated for a couple of years it seems.. >>> > >>> > Anyone? >>> > >>> > Thanks, >>> > Andy >>> >>> Hi Andy! >>> >>> I do php-src/extension development[0] and would love to port pecl-pdflib >>> to PHP 7 if you need it/can confirm everything works. >>> >>> thanks >>> >>> [0] http://pecl.php.net/user/seander >>> >> >> > From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat Aug 6 22:07:56 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 031BDBB16A4 for ; Sat, 6 Aug 2016 22:07:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from john@thehowies.com) Received: from remote.thehowies.com (remote.thehowies.com [50.197.91.218]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "remote.thehowies.com", Issuer "RapidSSL CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D0BC51186 for ; Sat, 6 Aug 2016 22:07:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from john@thehowies.com) Received: from PRIMARY.thehowies.local ([fe80::497b:de8e:1045:4c2a]) by PRIMARY.thehowies.local ([fe80::497b:de8e:1045:4c2a%24]) with mapi id 14.03.0279.002; Sat, 6 Aug 2016 15:06:42 -0700 From: John Howie To: "un_x@Safe-mail.net" CC: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: FreeBSD and TTY Thread-Topic: FreeBSD and TTY Thread-Index: AQHR8B92mB8Fh+vCeEqO2ZVSa0xTD6A8fV6x Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2016 22:06:40 +0000 Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Aug 2016 22:07:56 -0000 Check out: http://www.tech-faq.com/tty-tdd.html. The TTY/TDD machines commo= nly found make use of different signaling systems and protocols than the mo= dem you likely have supports. You might get lucky, though. If your modem do= es support TTY/TDD protocols you can use cu or tip just fine. If you are in the US, there are plenty of charities than can provide you a = TTY/TDD machine free of charge. They are given out to deaf and speech impai= red individuals, so you would qualify. I used to volunteer at one-such char= ity, running their IT systems. John Sent from my iPhone > On Aug 6, 2016, at 13:16, "un_x@Safe-mail.net" wrote= : >=20 > I suffered a stroke a while back, and one of the > effects was that it impaired my speech to the point > where all of these automated answering services > cannot understand my answers to their questions. > Even simple yes/no or numbers or whatever they ask. > And I see that many have TTY numbers for deaf people, > and I'm not deaf, but I was thinking maybe I could > make use of them. >=20 > Does anyone know if 'cu(1)' can be used? I do have > a normal 33.6 modem connected to a phone line, and > I tried to research and study to find out how this > may be possible, but I couldn't find clear and > definitive information, but it did seem like TTY > is just a normal dialup connection with a very > slow baud rate. I guess they also have special > TTY machines, but that is beyond my immediate > ability; without getting into too many details. >=20 > If anyone can help, thanks! > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg"