From owner-freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Sun Oct 16 21:00:15 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-virtualization@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A53FC14B60 for ; Sun, 16 Oct 2016 21:00:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 073D215D5 for ; Sun, 16 Oct 2016 21:00:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u9GL01Zi044653 for ; Sun, 16 Oct 2016 21:00:14 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201610162100.u9GL01Zi044653@kenobi.freebsd.org> From: bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org To: freebsd-virtualization@FreeBSD.org Subject: Problem reports for freebsd-virtualization@FreeBSD.org that need special attention Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2016 21:00:14 +0000 X-BeenThere: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion of various virtualization techniques FreeBSD supports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2016 21:00:15 -0000 To view an individual PR, use: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=(Bug Id). The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users, which need special attention. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and obsolete releases. Status | Bug Id | Description ------------+-----------+--------------------------------------------------- New | 212711 | [typo] bhyve: virtio-rnd PCI ID doesn't match vio New | 212820 | FreeBSD 10-STABLE from latest HEAD and 11-RELEASE 2 problems total for which you should take action. From owner-freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Tue Oct 18 01:59:08 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-virtualization@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85E47C157C9 for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2016 01:59:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vas@mpeks.tomsk.su) Received: from relay2.tomsk.ru (mail.sibptus.tomsk.ru [212.73.124.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01C38DEC for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2016 01:59:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vas@mpeks.tomsk.su) X-Virus-Scanned: by clamd daemon 0.98.5_1 for FreeBSD at relay2.tomsk.ru Received: from [212.73.125.240] (HELO admin.sibptus.transneft.ru) by relay2.tomsk.ru (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.16) with ESMTPS id 39386090 for freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org; Tue, 18 Oct 2016 07:58:44 +0600 Received: from admin.sibptus.transneft.ru (sudakov@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by admin.sibptus.transneft.ru (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id u9I1x5Xp042451 for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2016 08:59:05 +0700 (KRAT) (envelope-from vas@mpeks.tomsk.su) Received: (from sudakov@localhost) by admin.sibptus.transneft.ru (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id u9I1x3Rh042450 for freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org; Tue, 18 Oct 2016 08:59:03 +0700 (KRAT) (envelope-from vas@mpeks.tomsk.su) X-Authentication-Warning: admin.sibptus.transneft.ru: sudakov set sender to vas@mpeks.tomsk.su using -f Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2016 08:59:03 +0700 From: Victor Sudakov To: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Subject: choice of i386 vs amd64 guest Message-ID: <20161018015903.GA42265@admin.sibptus.transneft.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Organization: AO "Svyaztransneft", SibPTUS X-PGP-Key: http://www.dreamwidth.org/pubkey?user=victor_sudakov X-PGP-Fingerprint: 10E3 1171 1273 E007 C2E9 3532 0DA4 F259 9B5E C634 User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27) X-BeenThere: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion of various virtualization techniques FreeBSD supports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2016 01:59:08 -0000 Colleagues, When I must run several FreeBSD guests in bhyve, should I prefer i386 or amd64 guests provided a guest will never need more than 2-3 GB of RAM? The bhyve host is of course amd64. -- Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN sip:sudakov@sibptus.tomsk.ru From owner-freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Tue Oct 18 02:35:19 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-virtualization@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA32AC164E0 for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2016 02:35:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from paul@redbarn.org) Received: from family.redbarn.org (family.redbarn.org [IPv6:2001:559:8000:cd::5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B9574EB2 for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2016 02:35:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from paul@redbarn.org) Received: from [24.104.150.148] (unknown [24.104.150.148]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by family.redbarn.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 86D6E3AF58; Tue, 18 Oct 2016 02:35:18 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <58058A64.6010908@redbarn.org> Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2016 19:35:16 -0700 From: Paul Vixie User-Agent: Postbox 5.0.4 (Windows/20161007) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Victor Sudakov CC: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Subject: Re: choice of i386 vs amd64 guest References: <20161018015903.GA42265@admin.sibptus.transneft.ru> In-Reply-To: <20161018015903.GA42265@admin.sibptus.transneft.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion of various virtualization techniques FreeBSD supports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2016 02:35:19 -0000 Victor Sudakov wrote: > Colleagues, > > When I must run several FreeBSD guests in bhyve, should I prefer i386 > or amd64 guests provided a guest will never need more than 2-3 GB of > RAM? if you're running bind9, the sizeof(void *) will dominate your heap size, and a 32-bit guest will be better overall, given that you don't need the larger addressing size. for everything else, the larger register set on amd64 will matter more, and you should probably use a 64-bit guest. -- P Vixie From owner-freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Tue Oct 18 08:41:14 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-virtualization@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EE1EC150F9 for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2016 08:41:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vas@mpeks.tomsk.su) Received: from relay2.tomsk.ru (mail.sibptus.tomsk.ru [212.73.124.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1BB4998 for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2016 08:41:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vas@mpeks.tomsk.su) X-Virus-Scanned: by clamd daemon 0.98.5_1 for FreeBSD at relay2.tomsk.ru Received: from [212.73.125.240] (HELO admin.sibptus.transneft.ru) by relay2.tomsk.ru (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.16) with ESMTPS id 39386371; Tue, 18 Oct 2016 14:40:49 +0600 Received: from admin.sibptus.transneft.ru (sudakov@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by admin.sibptus.transneft.ru (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id u9I8fAXg060325; Tue, 18 Oct 2016 15:41:10 +0700 (KRAT) (envelope-from vas@mpeks.tomsk.su) Received: (from sudakov@localhost) by admin.sibptus.transneft.ru (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id u9I8f77D060324; Tue, 18 Oct 2016 15:41:07 +0700 (KRAT) (envelope-from vas@mpeks.tomsk.su) X-Authentication-Warning: admin.sibptus.transneft.ru: sudakov set sender to vas@mpeks.tomsk.su using -f Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2016 15:41:07 +0700 From: Victor Sudakov To: Paul Vixie Cc: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Subject: Re: choice of i386 vs amd64 guest Message-ID: <20161018084107.GA60191@admin.sibptus.transneft.ru> References: <20161018015903.GA42265@admin.sibptus.transneft.ru> <58058A64.6010908@redbarn.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <58058A64.6010908@redbarn.org> Organization: AO "Svyaztransneft", SibPTUS X-PGP-Key: http://www.dreamwidth.org/pubkey?user=victor_sudakov X-PGP-Fingerprint: 10E3 1171 1273 E007 C2E9 3532 0DA4 F259 9B5E C634 User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.1 (2016-10-04) X-BeenThere: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion of various virtualization techniques FreeBSD supports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2016 08:41:14 -0000 Paul Vixie wrote: > > > > > When I must run several FreeBSD guests in bhyve, should I prefer i386 > > or amd64 guests provided a guest will never need more than 2-3 GB of > > RAM? > > if you're running bind9, the sizeof(void *) will dominate your heap > size, and a 32-bit guest will be better overall, given that you don't > need the larger addressing size. Those guests will be running web servers mostly. > > for everything else, the larger register set on amd64 will matter more, > and you should probably use a 64-bit guest. There is an opinion that 64-bit systems use up more resources than 32-bit ones for the same tasks, it that not true? -- Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN sip:sudakov@sibptus.tomsk.ru From owner-freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Tue Oct 18 09:04:53 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-virtualization@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66605C15C2B for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2016 09:04:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nicolas.gilles@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lf0-x22d.google.com (mail-lf0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D8CD46B1 for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2016 09:04:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nicolas.gilles@gmail.com) Received: by mail-lf0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id b75so336887732lfg.3 for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2016 02:04:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=WlBR5/FZc8n6LnHlgYBWZF/XUnq0ZBALc5VWj6P3fS4=; b=Dfsk7OAHwvUpDYF4j4o9SaDeQsKIuf3CCbwnuvJKhytwg5EMI5uRh9UBlZBwGfHxfN LYM3vcZjkcZ7dWxMirjwk40VzVVzdPKpAe1Lqp8PjPqK5WOJ2RHk5AJtDS+3nrNR9f9q 93lk3usKFjdWI9rrcYgSSftEI1vj3AZsxDIG0+mxn0wv4lvTqZDuQN3KvuWsz+VnWW/8 5bH6Bc4Bk8p3/SzHBSXnfO34yOevHK9G/bJiAQESu3z02yqQCu3774d4qJ5SbVd/QdKs 0lKQqvucs8u0QMAFrmeOrDHtJIwFotgz9flrrFeoV1+6xXAfqiOPXTqG5/BXUhy7h2eA 82XQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=WlBR5/FZc8n6LnHlgYBWZF/XUnq0ZBALc5VWj6P3fS4=; b=Qy6zZZf8SSlS69hXtaDBaZsJzfs3L9qHyy1f6DNgpdco77OPtGJwYpXyhkQFS+E/9v 077i2F5fSYa480hYxpltOqUpI4QwPRtkf8PDHxvrbIHBqy2tI0uchBlVlhICd414QZgo 1/5ujl5ou+B+g0y5p145KJ+W+TcZ//afflYp79ms8Cu/eoDB1u0A+gD62NMzhzrXX1AU VpGkP6RKsO8lxMlWKbESaPmUtxBACX+F2hfkVZ2DhUVe2TI61R8XOuOLW+MJq16XRfi5 nK6lZEqW1u/lIB3flx81iLSFNEulPL/5nE3vzqbjNM1mgU0On9KA5SRB7fFV8XNsjtqn ZY+A== X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9RkXgRmv2l8SPaIUuLzqTSTXbGI+g4vLNq/a2cU1UrgKpxGcLOFZgr2E05fi7aa/Y5JGifLCgeu/FeMncw== X-Received: by 10.25.43.12 with SMTP id r12mr20312097lfr.104.1476781490138; Tue, 18 Oct 2016 02:04:50 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.25.195.147 with HTTP; Tue, 18 Oct 2016 02:04:49 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20161018084107.GA60191@admin.sibptus.transneft.ru> References: <20161018015903.GA42265@admin.sibptus.transneft.ru> <58058A64.6010908@redbarn.org> <20161018084107.GA60191@admin.sibptus.transneft.ru> From: Nicolas Gilles Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2016 11:04:49 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: choice of i386 vs amd64 guest To: Victor Sudakov Cc: Paul Vixie , freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion of various virtualization techniques FreeBSD supports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2016 09:04:53 -0000 On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 10:41 AM, Victor Sudakov wrote: > Paul Vixie wrote: >> >> > >> > When I must run several FreeBSD guests in bhyve, should I prefer i386 >> > or amd64 guests provided a guest will never need more than 2-3 GB of >> > RAM? >> >> if you're running bind9, the sizeof(void *) will dominate your heap >> size, and a 32-bit guest will be better overall, given that you don't >> need the larger addressing size. > > Those guests will be running web servers mostly. > >> >> for everything else, the larger register set on amd64 will matter more, >> and you should probably use a 64-bit guest. > > There is an opinion that 64-bit systems use up more resources than > 32-bit ones for the same tasks, it that not true? > Yes, in fact, it's not an opinion, it's a fact, the "issue" is that in amd64 pointers are 64bits wide, so take up twice as much space in memory as they would on 32-bit mode. So if your workload/datastructures are mainly manipulating lots of pointers you will see higher memory usage. On the other hand 64bit has larger register set and guaranteed presence of SSE2 instructions making it more suitable where more computations are taking place. > -- > Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN > sip:sudakov@sibptus.tomsk.ru > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-virtualization > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-virtualization-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Tue Oct 18 14:26:48 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-virtualization@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13EF9C16DAB for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2016 14:26:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from paul@redbarn.org) Received: from family.redbarn.org (family.redbarn.org [IPv6:2001:559:8000:cd::5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 05410CB6 for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2016 14:26:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from paul@redbarn.org) Received: from [24.104.150.148] (unknown [24.104.150.148]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by family.redbarn.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 918EE3AF94; Tue, 18 Oct 2016 14:26:41 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <5806311F.3060905@redbarn.org> Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2016 07:26:39 -0700 From: Paul Vixie User-Agent: Postbox 5.0.4 (Windows/20161007) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Victor Sudakov CC: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Subject: Re: choice of i386 vs amd64 guest References: <20161018015903.GA42265@admin.sibptus.transneft.ru> <58058A64.6010908@redbarn.org> <20161018084107.GA60191@admin.sibptus.transneft.ru> In-Reply-To: <20161018084107.GA60191@admin.sibptus.transneft.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion of various virtualization techniques FreeBSD supports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2016 14:26:48 -0000 Victor Sudakov wrote: > Paul Vixie wrote: >> for everything else, the larger register set on amd64 will matter more, >> and you should probably use a 64-bit guest. > > There is an opinion that 64-bit systems use up more resources than > 32-bit ones for the same tasks, it that not true? it's not true. only the size of a pointer can affect you, and only if your RAM will be mostly full of pointers, as it would be with BIND9. for a web server you'll notice no real difference between CPU modes. -- P Vixie From owner-freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Wed Oct 19 09:00:29 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-virtualization@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54D0AC1871C for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2016 09:00:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 43D5D790 for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2016 09:00:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u9J90QE3023112 for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2016 09:00:29 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-virtualization@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 212721] FreeBSD 11.0-RC2/RC3/RELEASE fails on Hyper-V 2012r2 Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2016 09:00:25 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0-RC1 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: sepherosa@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-virtualization@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: mfc-stable10? mfc-stable11? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion of various virtualization techniques FreeBSD supports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2016 09:00:29 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D212721 --- Comment #44 from Sepherosa Ziehau --- MFC to stable/10 and stable/11 are done. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Thu Oct 20 05:17:37 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-virtualization@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A883C184C7 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2016 05:17:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EDCCEE86 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2016 05:17:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u9K5HaSH033982 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2016 05:17:36 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-virtualization@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 213618] When running as a Hyper-V Guest, FreeBSD 11 networking does not work Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 05:17:36 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0-RC1 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: linimon@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-virtualization@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc assigned_to Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion of various virtualization techniques FreeBSD supports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 05:17:37 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D213618 Mark Linimon changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.org | Assignee|freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org |freebsd-virtualization@Free | |BSD.org --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Thu Oct 20 06:39:12 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-virtualization@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0EB4C1A2AE for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2016 06:39:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CFF81ABD for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2016 06:39:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u9K6dC5k057767 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2016 06:39:12 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-virtualization@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 213618] When running as a Hyper-V Guest, FreeBSD 11 networking does not work Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 06:39:12 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0-RC1 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: sepherosa@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-virtualization@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion of various virtualization techniques FreeBSD supports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 06:39:13 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D213618 Sepherosa Ziehau changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sepherosa@gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Sepherosa Ziehau --- Can you try hnX on 11-stable? There is a bug I fixed for WS2008R2, which s= hows the same symptom as you have described (receiving works, sending does not). --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Thu Oct 20 13:38:06 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-virtualization@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC4A7C19912 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2016 13:38:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB63DE01 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2016 13:38:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u9KDc6OT083599 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2016 13:38:06 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-virtualization@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 213618] When running as a Hyper-V Guest, FreeBSD 11 networking does not work Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 13:38:06 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0-RC1 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: caesar@starkreality.com X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-virtualization@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion of various virtualization techniques FreeBSD supports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 13:38:06 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D213618 --- Comment #3 from caesar@starkreality.com --- There don't appear to be any 11-STABLE snapshots available on ftp.freebsd.o= rg at the moment, just 10.3-STABLE and 12-CURRENT. I'll try to use FreeBSD-up= date to upgrade a 10.3-RELEASE to 11-STABLE. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Thu Oct 20 21:11:11 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-virtualization@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C239C1A071 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2016 21:11:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B083771 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2016 21:11:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u9KLBAUu071174 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2016 21:11:10 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-virtualization@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 213618] When running as a Hyper-V Guest, FreeBSD 11 networking does not work Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 21:11:11 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0-RC1 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: caesar@starkreality.com X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-virtualization@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion of various virtualization techniques FreeBSD supports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 21:11:11 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D213618 --- Comment #4 from caesar@starkreality.com --- Had to checkout 11.0-STABLE with subversion and build from scratch. I can confirm that the problem appears to be fixed in -STABLE. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Fri Oct 21 18:32:39 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-virtualization@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4B05C1CB0D for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2016 18:32:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca) Received: from doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (doctor.nl2k.ab.ca [204.209.81.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F436ED4 for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2016 18:32:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca) Received: from doctor by doctor.nl2k.ab.ca with local (Exim 4.87 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1bxebA-0005ow-EE for freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org; Fri, 21 Oct 2016 12:31:20 -0600 Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2016 12:31:20 -0600 From: The Doctor To: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Subject: Windows 2016 Server Message-ID: <20161021183120.GA21232@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.1 (2016-10-04) X-BeenThere: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion of various virtualization techniques FreeBSD supports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2016 18:32:39 -0000 Does anyone have Windows 2016 Server Release 1 working on thier sysem. After following https://wiki.freebsd.org/bhyve/Windows I run /usr/sbin/bhyve -c 2 -s 0,hostbridge -s 3,ahci-hd,./windows2016.img -s 4,ahci-cd,./.iso/win2k16install.iso -s 10,virtio-net,tap15 -s 31,lpc -l com1,/dev/nmdm15A -l com2,/dev/nmdm16A -l bootrom,/usr/local/share/uefi-firmware/BHYVE_UEFI.fd -m 2G -H -w windows2016guest I can cu -l into /dev/nmdm15B I see SAC but cannot seem to go further. Help. -- Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca God,Queen and country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! http://www.fullyfollow.me/rootnl2k Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism Time for the USA to hold a referendum on its republic and vote to dissolve!! From owner-freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Fri Oct 21 19:01:23 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-virtualization@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67A29C1B31D for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2016 19:01:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca) Received: from doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (doctor.nl2k.ab.ca [204.209.81.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F442A2D for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2016 19:01:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca) Received: from doctor by doctor.nl2k.ab.ca with local (Exim 4.87 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1bxf4E-00081m-D0 for freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org; Fri, 21 Oct 2016 13:01:22 -0600 Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2016 13:01:22 -0600 From: The Doctor To: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Windows 2016 Server Message-ID: <20161021190122.GA30602@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> References: <20161021183120.GA21232@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20161021183120.GA21232@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.1 (2016-10-04) X-BeenThere: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion of various virtualization techniques FreeBSD supports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2016 19:01:23 -0000 On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 12:31:20PM -0600, The Doctor wrote: > Does anyone have Windows 2016 Server Release 1 working on thier sysem. > > After following https://wiki.freebsd.org/bhyve/Windows > > I run > > /usr/sbin/bhyve -c 2 -s 0,hostbridge -s 3,ahci-hd,./windows2016.img -s 4,ahci-cd,./.iso/win2k16install.iso -s 10,virtio-net,tap15 -s 31,lpc -l com1,/dev/nmdm15A -l com2,/dev/nmdm16A -l bootrom,/usr/local/share/uefi-firmware/BHYVE_UEFI.fd -m 2G -H -w windows2016guest > > I can cu -l into /dev/nmdm15B I see SAC > > but cannot seem to go further. > > Help. Further in one of the Windows, I see = 0x0, hrValidated = 0x1, hrResult = 0x80220005 2016-10-21 12:58:10, Info IBS UnattendErrorFromResults: Hit an unattend error; dumping any info we have about the failure... 2016-10-21 12:58:10, Info IBS UnattendDumpSetting: ------Un attend setting error / warning------ 2016-10-21 12:58:10, Info IBS UnattendDumpSetting: Error co de = 0x80220005 2016-10-21 12:58:10, Info IBS UnattendDumpSetting: Pass = w indowsPE 2016-10-21 12:58:10, Info IBS UnattendDumpSetting: -------- ------------------------------------ 2016-10-21 12:58:10, Info IBS UnattendErrorFromResults: Err or text = Windows could not parse or process unattend answer file [D:\autounatt end.xml] for pass [windowsPE]. The answer file is invalid. 2016-10-21 12:58:10, Error [0x0600c2] IBS Callback_Unattend_InitEngine: An error occurred while finding/loading the unattend file; hr = 0x1, hrResult = 0x80220005[gle=0x00000490] 2016-10-21 12:58:10, Info IBSLIB PublishCriticalError: Publish ing blocked message [Windows could not parse or process unattend answer file [D :\autounattend.xml] for pass [windowsPE]. The answer file is invalid.] 2016-10-21 12:58:10, Info This installation is blocked from completing due to compliance failures or invalid input; this is not an int ernal error. What went wrong? -- Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca God,Queen and country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! http://www.fullyfollow.me/rootnl2k Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism Time for the USA to hold a referendum on its republic and vote to dissolve!! From owner-freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Fri Oct 21 22:17:34 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-virtualization@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 120A3C1BA8A for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2016 22:17:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from saper@saper.info) Received: from m.saper.info (m.saper.info [IPv6:2a01:4f8:a0:7383::]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "saper.info", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 96C3D309 for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2016 22:17:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from saper@saper.info) Received: from m.saper.info (saper@m.saper.info [IPv6:2a01:4f8:a0:7383::]) by m.saper.info (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id u9LMHRcn082667 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 21 Oct 2016 22:17:27 GMT (envelope-from saper@saper.info) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=saper.info; s=Sep2014; t=1477088247; bh=6j9oVVUUqXVpvdLo4UeOkGQPYhEuFAdaBoJwNWw6cTM=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=ohI3nUgATiRWF3ONnZTkFsUHbPvnuoBL2AFQDQFRU5qx0cdqmsQSQTayDfUs3rkGf nn8AiApI4IgQB9NMGFstWScJg/27pKK9q7SrsmB+l31WjQH5oOGR5DhXRCni5RpJBx Kkw4HMoxVTR8zqeCe4qAO14618l2wvXeCwlLZ0n4= Received: from localhost (saper@localhost) by m.saper.info (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) with ESMTP id u9LMHQQm082664; Fri, 21 Oct 2016 22:17:27 GMT (envelope-from saper@saper.info) X-Authentication-Warning: m.saper.info: saper owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2016 22:17:26 +0000 From: Marcin Cieslak To: The Doctor cc: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Windows 2016 Server In-Reply-To: <20161021190122.GA30602@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> Message-ID: References: <20161021183120.GA21232@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> <20161021190122.GA30602@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-BeenThere: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion of various virtualization techniques FreeBSD supports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2016 22:17:34 -0000 On Fri, 21 Oct 2016, The Doctor wrote: > What went wrong? Windows: > [Windows could not parse or process unattend answer file [D:\autounattend.xml] for pass [windowsPE]. The answer file is invalid.] Something is wrong with your autounattend.xml file. Marcin From owner-freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Fri Oct 21 22:21:24 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-virtualization@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CABA5C1BCAA for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2016 22:21:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from grehan@freebsd.org) Received: from alto.onthenet.com.au (alto.OntheNet.com.au [203.13.68.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CDF2784 for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2016 22:21:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from grehan@freebsd.org) Received: from iredmail.onthenet.com.au (iredmail.onthenet.com.au [203.13.68.150]) by alto.onthenet.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C5FA20A10BF for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2016 08:21:03 +1000 (AEST) Received: from localhost (iredmail.onthenet.com.au [127.0.0.1]) by iredmail.onthenet.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5275B280A20 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2016 08:21:03 +1000 (AEST) X-Amavis-Modified: Mail body modified (using disclaimer) - iredmail.onthenet.com.au Received: from iredmail.onthenet.com.au ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (iredmail.onthenet.com.au [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id r-JG7rZWnTpG for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2016 08:21:03 +1000 (AEST) Received: from Peters-MacBook-Pro-2.local (96-82-80-65-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [96.82.80.65]) by iredmail.onthenet.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3DBAC28095E; Sat, 22 Oct 2016 08:21:00 +1000 (AEST) Subject: Re: Windows 2016 Server To: The Doctor References: <20161021183120.GA21232@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> <20161021190122.GA30602@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> Cc: Marcin Cieslak , freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org From: Peter Grehan Message-ID: <0406d06f-aa1a-677c-775a-b09a3ebd3073@freebsd.org> Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2016 15:21:10 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-CMAE-Score: 0 X-CMAE-Analysis: v=2.2 cv=Jq6BlIwC c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=A6CF0fG5TOl4vs6YHvqXgw==:117 a=mwgbnDbW7alINpy3vhoKyg==:17 a=N659UExz7-8A:10 a=CH0kA5CcgfcA:10 a=_L_oREkXlSYxHRV7FyYA:9 a=pILNOxqGKmIA:10 a=y3Tzvk6fnAIA:10 wl=host:3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion of various virtualization techniques FreeBSD supports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2016 22:21:24 -0000 >> [Windows could not parse or process unattend answer file >> [D:\autounattend.xml] for pass [windowsPE]. The answer file is >> invalid.] > > Something is wrong with your autounattend.xml file. Still working on the 2k16 unattend file. Unfortunately things have changed from TP5 in a non-obvious way :( A workaround is to do a GUI install. later, Peter. From owner-freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Fri Oct 21 22:23:44 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-virtualization@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20436C1BD11 for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2016 22:23:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca) Received: from doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (doctor.nl2k.ab.ca [204.209.81.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 08EA28E5; Fri, 21 Oct 2016 22:23:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca) Received: from doctor by doctor.nl2k.ab.ca with local (Exim 4.87 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1bxiE2-000KwU-I8; Fri, 21 Oct 2016 16:23:42 -0600 Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2016 16:23:42 -0600 From: The Doctor To: Peter Grehan Cc: Marcin Cieslak , freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Windows 2016 Server Message-ID: <20161021222342.GA80184@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> References: <20161021183120.GA21232@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> <20161021190122.GA30602@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> <0406d06f-aa1a-677c-775a-b09a3ebd3073@freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <0406d06f-aa1a-677c-775a-b09a3ebd3073@freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.1 (2016-10-04) X-BeenThere: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion of various virtualization techniques FreeBSD supports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2016 22:23:44 -0000 On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 03:21:10PM -0700, Peter Grehan wrote: > >> [Windows could not parse or process unattend answer file > >> [D:\autounattend.xml] for pass [windowsPE]. The answer file is > >> invalid.] > > > > Something is wrong with your autounattend.xml file. > > Still working on the 2k16 unattend file. Unfortunately things have > changed from TP5 in a non-obvious way :( > > A workaround is to do a GUI install. > > later, > > Peter. Please explain what you mean by a GUI install. -- Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca God,Queen and country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! http://www.fullyfollow.me/rootnl2k Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism Time for the USA to hold a referendum on its republic and vote to dissolve!! From owner-freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Sat Oct 22 09:37:55 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-virtualization@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 942F4C1C4E5 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2016 09:37:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 836DA256 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2016 09:37:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u9M9bt7R017086 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2016 09:37:55 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-virtualization@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 213689] Allow bhyve to run from non-root user Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2016 09:37:55 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: patch X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: linimon@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-virtualization@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: assigned_to keywords cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion of various virtualization techniques FreeBSD supports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2016 09:37:55 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D213689 Mark Linimon changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org |freebsd-virtualization@Free | |BSD.org Keywords| |patch CC|freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.org | --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=