From owner-freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Mon Jul 11 10:06:42 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-wireless@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32BD3B849AE for ; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 10:06:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from no-reply@x57.vip.6pm-coupon.com) Received: from x57.vip.6pm-coupon.com (x57.vip.6pm-coupon.com [104.148.25.57]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A9631E06 for ; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 10:06:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from no-reply@x57.vip.6pm-coupon.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=6pm-coupon; d=x57.vip.6pm-coupon.com; h=MIME-Version:From:To:Date:Subject:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; i=no-reply@x57.vip.6pm-coupon.com; bh=0TIaVjKopyLvt1xvl/5D5zRgSBI=; b=xdAkwpLajHmcfsx81483U5Lf5zVWCBMvszFE/oJqXxypPmKXxPLtKaW9CoJX/Ik9F3oo9852UnVv yn+Hb5lM2HA12vhIwJyXVbVPu7udrjkHkKPVKm09ynE2pfk7ZVgq1vHPJlhv2AvytWPrDw/2Ujma A0V8RWISrRirboX3Mf4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; q=dns; s=6pm-coupon; d=x57.vip.6pm-coupon.com; b=Vrj0wJhTAeT7FilJbBdN7+osDgtNMihj7UojHfu+ftMz8nzBfRFGIkC63rYbZJGm0w+Ef6/SXXAv nJCrgb7WaIIRP/Nm1Hpfh56A0Y1PXxKyRmTPAwr+87b/BR0CjS9G5TgSL8LdBu6RQ1QYFsvijAGN 97hOhDYw8AMWit3HfEw=; From: "Ray.Ban Sunglasses" To: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Date: 11 Jul 2016 17:46:17 +0800 Subject: Breaking:Black Sunday &Cyber Monday Sale Now On!196 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussions of 802.11 stack, tools device driver development." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 10:06:42 -0000 From owner-freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Wed Jul 13 17:53:33 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-wireless@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1A31B98E7F for ; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 17:53:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from petr.fischer@me.com) Received: from pv33p00im-asmtp003.me.com (pv33p00im-asmtp003.me.com [17.142.194.252]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F6BE1655 for ; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 17:53:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from petr.fischer@me.com) Received: from process-dkim-sign-daemon.pv33p00im-asmtp003.me.com by pv33p00im-asmtp003.me.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7.0.5.38.0 64bit (built Feb 26 2016)) id <0OA900H00IPXX000@pv33p00im-asmtp003.me.com> for freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 16:53:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost (109.2.broadband2.iol.cz [83.208.2.109]) by pv33p00im-asmtp003.me.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7.0.5.38.0 64bit (built Feb 26 2016)) with ESMTPSA id <0OA9002M0IX0EJ00@pv33p00im-asmtp003.me.com> for freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 16:53:27 +0000 (GMT) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:,, definitions=2016-07-13_08:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 suspectscore=1 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1510270003 definitions=main-1607130184 Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 18:53:23 +0200 From: Petr Fischer To: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Subject: 11n support (more speed) on Intel 3160 - is it better on 7260 or 8260? Message-id: <20160713165323.GK59497@pf-bsd.local> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=me.com; s=4d515a; t=1468428807; bh=nEM2/ykvLTp00ZcdjHmTFLi+7bot8V/cVNqQugnd0gw=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-id:MIME-version:Content-type; b=ggf069hLlRHgmVaGnkZQyXa49cus5A99bsWS576k9OZntTd7FnLbeOzsnW89Xm+AM fj0gM8VP2rvrVJmwu1vb7QZUTgq5CJqQOVm6NqIHVYALQunQ00TTd26hU9QGQmLKDa iewWxcpzyjbQ03//3VIAjRkuuBhKrWiJopS1kkzxeEwaRUmWSIOzV3lJ/Bzmojqdov a/Y1NHRU9RbjhR9jmmXlptjcqg8hjBlXcHi+zIgD3toi0olL5r4IgCn/M2NGOdTygH ILVDj3Fz5s6PeGP+iEZH60XUeYSSuunxx4Xy49vCZ4l0RsevPvXkJq9KTqgzbSQ9Fc ZBLoqUnBrhpmQ== X-BeenThere: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussions of 802.11 stack, tools device driver development." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 17:53:33 -0000 Hello, I have "Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3160NGW" in my Toshiba Z30 notebook. Under 11-CURRENT, I can connect with 11g (54MBps) only. Is there some support for 11n (higher speeds) on the road? Can I solve this with upgrade to the 7260 or 8260 wifi cards? Has these cards better support on 11-CURRENT? 1) http://www.ebay.com/itm/Intel-Wireless-N-7260NGW-BN-Dual-Band-M-2-NGFF-300M-BT4-0-WIFI-Card-2-4-5-0GHZ-/201580891333 2) http://www.ebay.com/itm/Intel-Wireless-Dual-Band-AC-8260-8260NGW-867Mbps-WIFI-Card-Bluetooth-4-2-UK-/222173542184 Thanks! pf From owner-freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Wed Jul 13 17:57:56 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-wireless@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45433B9710F for ; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 17:57:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from meyer.sydney@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-wm0-x22e.google.com (mail-wm0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DEE321A39 for ; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 17:57:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from meyer.sydney@googlemail.com) Received: by mail-wm0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id f126so38997127wma.1 for ; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 10:57:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=OGTfaEubMJIhBQeT+37nj9Dn+YpBYDdznBIWhV9q81k=; b=V03cHnu4pga2E/PQ3ENBQR8+vJkvYbBi9Kno6bCQ4LBQ/PWy82nqctw6UODSJdoDk3 +z7ot/wzdPmfVNB1xBiERAZ2QkH8neb9fnrqKzuWEtqt8tSn3VZfwGSbMxzDdKzjaQW5 DnraEy9oHZIvakxosfBTCsunJKaLx9/yJwHRUjxyumd/bArYPnvv+zddn7mapkCWVH/F aI7CxF7d77SNHyZS3eI8gz13UyE2yU5peSrGHs4z1vX6LuARMfjC42gAHuflAVKGqybc lWmycBcL4cLshxxYfYmLK8g1dFoF9sBVJYniL5LdxTVa0V2Z+lws+QfEw9sDR9CgK4Lt rPfw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=OGTfaEubMJIhBQeT+37nj9Dn+YpBYDdznBIWhV9q81k=; b=jH9ImTZyA6BGCjuKAVkvXQVj4K8IWdaG3acGEQQhJAH3QAve5JY20ym3HtmlH50GFf V/MGlV/m2HCgBcNcAcTcXOnMuenT/2ZcfLMXbRXRBjLATgQBoT+GjsuIUqLP9oK3UFe0 dd+7jjYDPrFzYcM+wQB7tzqzjrOuAHMeALWeRPopywM5oh64/MubeLa0Sya6rwlGxUiQ EeUH03vKd6FJIWSnwzcUmlemgt32L4t8xClAz4ZORky2Tnf/iA7j5wv4eSA1tF6p/6Y+ MgEf64fmKqKdqjDgEM/XvAEmgHsuP4z2IfBIuRhca3UitRh3mZ8g/Xa2VCWc2WCgwmsH W0YQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tJyQmgBXV7U2EJwclD5OM6ce/7ZbeClLCpPfmQA+oPQ83f7/Ml5qNHhWoLoubBLrA== X-Received: by 10.28.126.195 with SMTP id z186mr29440784wmc.95.1468432674013; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 10:57:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2a02:a03f:a06:4400:1566:a762:9fc3:b8e4? ([2a02:a03f:a06:4400:1566:a762:9fc3:b8e4]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id z5sm29167952wme.5.2016.07.13.10.57.52 for (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 13 Jul 2016 10:57:53 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\)) Subject: Re: 11n support (more speed) on Intel 3160 - is it better on 7260 or 8260? From: Sydney Meyer In-Reply-To: <20160713165323.GK59497@pf-bsd.local> Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 19:57:52 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <8806959A-936C-4B58-8EEB-4A91849FB181@googlemail.com> References: <20160713165323.GK59497@pf-bsd.local> To: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124) X-BeenThere: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussions of 802.11 stack, tools device driver development." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 17:57:56 -0000 Hi, there is no 11-CURRENT anymore.. There is a commit to 12.0-CURRENT which = imports OpenBSD's iwm Driver for newer Intel Chipsets. https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=3Drevision&revision=3D286441 Sydney > On Jul 13, 2016, at 18:53, Petr Fischer wrote: >=20 > Hello, >=20 > I have "Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3160NGW" in my Toshiba Z30 = notebook. > Under 11-CURRENT, I can connect with 11g (54MBps) only. Is there some = support for 11n (higher speeds) on the road? >=20 > Can I solve this with upgrade to the 7260 or 8260 wifi cards? Has = these cards better support on 11-CURRENT? >=20 > 1) > = http://www.ebay.com/itm/Intel-Wireless-N-7260NGW-BN-Dual-Band-M-2-NGFF-300= M-BT4-0-WIFI-Card-2-4-5-0GHZ-/201580891333 >=20 > 2) > = http://www.ebay.com/itm/Intel-Wireless-Dual-Band-AC-8260-8260NGW-867Mbps-W= IFI-Card-Bluetooth-4-2-UK-/222173542184 >=20 > Thanks! pf > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless > To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-wireless-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Wed Jul 13 18:06:56 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-wireless@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F6F8B979FD for ; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 18:06:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8EC1B1649 for ; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 18:06:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u6DI6tGj070150 for ; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 18:06:56 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-wireless@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 210799] if_bwi broken after upgrade from 9 to 10 Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 18:06:55 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: wireless X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.3-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: patch, regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: linimon@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-wireless@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: short_desc keywords Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussions of 802.11 stack, tools device driver development." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 18:06:56 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D210799 Mark Linimon changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|if_bwi broken |if_bwi broken after upgrade | |from 9 to 10 Keywords| |patch, regression --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Wed Jul 13 18:09:24 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-wireless@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39FA7B97A97 for ; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 18:09:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-it0-x235.google.com (mail-it0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 04A481714 for ; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 18:09:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com) Received: by mail-it0-x235.google.com with SMTP id f6so27415931ith.1 for ; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 11:09:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=hQz5ocfARC+G6ywPAdO2lowT5ghMoEvO8mQwHas4zuo=; b=xuWMnzl47vbT+a/rNdL3/w8hFPcqRbmSdZ+mPTOqmkC9Fu0dpVBhL0QZtBZ+kULfnn bZnHh4u/wkMwhg+naCW3wNGFQ5lFB7raszFv2V8P/0PwDMosRhdtPkwdfzQhyRF7Jvcl CgpCom2qpT0ZHHHsy950yKs8lS34s6K/HuXHfWHAkmyjifhHxMUhOFxHPF/YV8ui92i6 XmsKgCfPhm18XLJuC77HrNaF+JjBwe+037KuEPQyeUi7S09kqee/JqKZfXx48P0F9C+S xNC7SgidFYjW5UjP8/CpWuY9OXQZ36x9/I1yrL7QCGENi7CNBC67OKi2ha3csApC50tg 6bOw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=hQz5ocfARC+G6ywPAdO2lowT5ghMoEvO8mQwHas4zuo=; b=BS1AxE/KezQ0LVzp8BYvfbkYp/ST05PrmEx4vVy7uIU6yUkRe2Ua0nxjDVUD8JoR9N VcQSFj5PFRKKpVxqakrAN7C2C8XFySOGlV2+Vend7EQa4i7ZX5cm8vXfCCw/1IDyzO/V YtqhazprzJG5XybDxfGkmnl9coJM8zlpqo88cBOdOCf9btUiFzsP2jK3SAVEeEsJqMBI 6A4SaZ1WFDP7P5D+G1BjOMscjYcchQP4tygWBLr+Dz1PfnOoJZXbLq6zqHLT4+3NtAwF cgzbRKtnnDFN7Qc/1A4nbyOkT5cy6zWQcI+lGKoE8bSkw4Xd/NpaTQ6iZwxgrSDpva12 Do+A== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tKM0Fn1cVBwpqK554h9I5Dtit3I+GA/Vi/ux6jUALELWYW17IcoAWDulbnDNBMYPVVRU8DcoGDXG9lyiw== X-Received: by 10.36.248.6 with SMTP id a6mr10069054ith.25.1468433363313; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 11:09:23 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.36.141.129 with HTTP; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 11:09:22 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <8806959A-936C-4B58-8EEB-4A91849FB181@googlemail.com> References: <20160713165323.GK59497@pf-bsd.local> <8806959A-936C-4B58-8EEB-4A91849FB181@googlemail.com> From: Adrian Chadd Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 11:09:22 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: 11n support (more speed) on Intel 3160 - is it better on 7260 or 8260? To: Sydney Meyer Cc: "freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussions of 802.11 stack, tools device driver development." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 18:09:24 -0000 Hi! I think there'll be some 11n work on the iwm driver soon. I just wanted to make sure the rest of the firmware command basics work right (which they do now) before I started looking at 11n. -a From owner-freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Wed Jul 13 18:12:31 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-wireless@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C187FB97EBE; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 18:12:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ler@lerctr.org) Received: from thebighonker.lerctr.org (thebighonker.lerctr.org [IPv6:2001:470:1f0f:3ad:223:7dff:fe9e:6e8a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "thebighonker.lerctr.org", Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D4011BC6; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 18:12:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ler@lerctr.org) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lerctr.org; s=lerami; h=Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Sender:Reply-To: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=YaX+j49BtHxgPW8l0KBhh+tGUxCdfDVqt61y6AG8Nx0=; b=tK81v+/h5R9nWeomMQeuxR1/Mh QIlMNNN5+pp9KVXny3G5IU68MRRUkAN007w7qNLfR3RRH/+mgOgzyHrECZRn3tDmJ3hS5zD2PJ5pH Gs89/NjpoZ2g5vhMpmgx6xHVyL7+0ljNAG7TZ3eDFgxO2q/UmV7tILZsvc8FmGSw6828=; Received: from thebighonker.lerctr.org ([2001:470:1f0f:3ad:223:7dff:fe9e:6e8a]:34101 helo=webmail.lerctr.org) by thebighonker.lerctr.org with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.87 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1bNOe3-000ITR-IZ; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 13:12:27 -0500 Received: from proxy.na.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.245.48.82]) by webmail.lerctr.org with HTTP (HTTP/1.1 POST); Wed, 13 Jul 2016 13:12:27 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 13:12:27 -0500 From: Larry Rosenman To: Sydney Meyer Cc: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org, owner-freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 11n support (more speed) on Intel 3160 - is it better on 7260 or 8260? In-Reply-To: <8806959A-936C-4B58-8EEB-4A91849FB181@googlemail.com> References: <20160713165323.GK59497@pf-bsd.local> <8806959A-936C-4B58-8EEB-4A91849FB181@googlemail.com> Message-ID: <1b62836ca3d3252fbe9178ac663d868a@thebighonker.lerctr.org> X-Sender: ler@lerctr.org User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.2.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussions of 802.11 stack, tools device driver development." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 18:12:31 -0000 That is an 11 month old commit..... On 2016-07-13 12:57, Sydney Meyer via freebsd-wireless wrote: > Hi, > > there is no 11-CURRENT anymore.. There is a commit to 12.0-CURRENT > which imports OpenBSD's iwm Driver for newer Intel Chipsets. > > https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=286441 > > Sydney > >> On Jul 13, 2016, at 18:53, Petr Fischer wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> I have "Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3160NGW" in my Toshiba Z30 >> notebook. >> Under 11-CURRENT, I can connect with 11g (54MBps) only. Is there some >> support for 11n (higher speeds) on the road? >> >> Can I solve this with upgrade to the 7260 or 8260 wifi cards? Has >> these cards better support on 11-CURRENT? >> >> 1) >> http://www.ebay.com/itm/Intel-Wireless-N-7260NGW-BN-Dual-Band-M-2-NGFF-300M-BT4-0-WIFI-Card-2-4-5-0GHZ-/201580891333 >> >> 2) >> http://www.ebay.com/itm/Intel-Wireless-Dual-Band-AC-8260-8260NGW-867Mbps-WIFI-Card-Bluetooth-4-2-UK-/222173542184 >> >> Thanks! pf >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org mailing list >> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "freebsd-wireless-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-wireless-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 214-642-9640 E-Mail: ler@lerctr.org US Mail: 17716 Limpia Crk, Round Rock, TX 78664-7281 From owner-freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Wed Jul 13 19:15:03 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-wireless@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC5E4B9816F for ; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 19:15:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jonathan@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C04C01869; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 19:15:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jonathan@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [134.153.27.124] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 487501FD7; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 19:15:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jonathan@FreeBSD.org) From: "Jonathan Anderson" To: "Adrian Chadd" Cc: "Sydney Meyer" , "freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: 11n support (more speed) on Intel 3160 - is it better on 7260 or 8260? Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 16:46:37 -0230 Message-ID: <09D2B764-FC66-4783-9EF3-0E7D6DFEDD60@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20160713165323.GK59497@pf-bsd.local> <8806959A-936C-4B58-8EEB-4A91849FB181@googlemail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed X-Mailer: MailMate (1.9.4r5234) X-BeenThere: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussions of 802.11 stack, tools device driver development." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 19:15:03 -0000 On 13 Jul 2016, at 15:39, Adrian Chadd wrote: > Hi! > > I think there'll be some 11n work on the iwm driver soon. I just > wanted to make sure the rest of the firmware command basics work right > (which they do now) before I started looking at 11n. Indeed, the situation has been improving dramatically over the past few months. However, now that things are at a state of "the basics work", is it a good time to create PRs such as, "iwm7265 disconnects from my wi-fi after a few hours" or "I have to run `service netif restart` every time I physically move to a new location"? Thanks, Jon -- Jonathan Anderson jonathan@FreeBSD.org From owner-freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Wed Jul 13 20:06:27 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-wireless@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1595BB981C0 for ; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 20:06:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-it0-x229.google.com (mail-it0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CE1CB1D46; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 20:06:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com) Received: by mail-it0-x229.google.com with SMTP id u186so30534973ita.0; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 13:06:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc; bh=40hzhe/kXKSk8sue2C59Kgfd94AFUVK603kR40rnlT8=; b=uJLAFLeZCDKaJNZC6IwcE+q6cDbFmddmenjFJ7TuPO03U0uV3eTvoAAN28NouLsJ/k pLXfhy2yh7vUKjL3LUVxYEzEYI8Oo+wbA2fGsI0Voi5pPkILxyn4o5TDembeNEv2CIjh OlUGCvWFHwaIUdvUuJCnTn/rtYGPFO5jY4Vj97RsqD1CCVVkUTL9FEeQ3ZEmmXyuIsRL tlo6GoqFGkwtb8AL5SpBWhkOulMnubPVZj4/35OI3EzBnGuqbDImQM99sWB4iixYASEI uh3h3FdnCpYsp0h1iMBPWZn9hwOuSdoYayjvKCTeUGFPsCmdwSuK6p/WLKoOBJWkCyTv JPnQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=40hzhe/kXKSk8sue2C59Kgfd94AFUVK603kR40rnlT8=; b=BsP9elVCrGHzr0RS/eQsjpEjhHX4XTGoXPLb6XfwQL06ooI3Yi0yQUhAd3CKjeVm+a ldgv6miowJCdiK1QnwbMPFWdywzbESlivLDk+UKjofJiVdYNNf1h7Kfy38x1hOfKh2fF AQ/AjjtOfjvZhahF3RoAYIZlx5ZRveDddt7ZHQGTPeMJFCebphjdtHSQ9Qj/T37TlBIe RMaC97KuzZLkdoCLJ9VD9AmWD/bmGfVa9CRKMWEMdu0n73vklUgLAFcduNCO/jLj/4ql +uTMgMD7gU7Uhn40jv/t/bGVJni7Gz0qX+tHc3R/gI/8phmH89mq6dYAVuQwVdvS7Owd FqDQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tKRoV9ubfFQkfzaBuuzM2E0nPxLCZD2zdh15JTEljnhLzKw6mLcHAro0m0OgOtH4pumDHiaFdi5KEnLnQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.36.248.6 with SMTP id a6mr10540135ith.25.1468440385822; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 13:06:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.141.129 with HTTP; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 13:06:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.141.129 with HTTP; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 13:06:25 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <09D2B764-FC66-4783-9EF3-0E7D6DFEDD60@FreeBSD.org> References: <20160713165323.GK59497@pf-bsd.local> <8806959A-936C-4B58-8EEB-4A91849FB181@googlemail.com> <09D2B764-FC66-4783-9EF3-0E7D6DFEDD60@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 13:06:25 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: 11n support (more speed) on Intel 3160 - is it better on 7260 or 8260? From: Adrian Chadd To: Jonathan Anderson Cc: Sydney Meyer , freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussions of 802.11 stack, tools device driver development." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 20:06:27 -0000 Development is 100% volunteer. No one is being paid to do it, so it happens at the speed of spare time. If you'd like that changed then please advocate to the foundation about how important wireless is! A On Jul 13, 2016 12:15 PM, "Jonathan Anderson" wrote: > On 13 Jul 2016, at 15:39, Adrian Chadd wrote: > > Hi! >> >> I think there'll be some 11n work on the iwm driver soon. I just >> wanted to make sure the rest of the firmware command basics work right >> (which they do now) before I started looking at 11n. >> > > Indeed, the situation has been improving dramatically over the past few > months. However, now that things are at a state of "the basics work", is it > a good time to create PRs such as, "iwm7265 disconnects from my wi-fi after > a few hours" or "I have to run `service netif restart` every time I > physically move to a new location"? > > Thanks, > > > Jon > -- > Jonathan Anderson > jonathan@FreeBSD.org > From owner-freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Wed Jul 13 20:23:51 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-wireless@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A1A6B98478 for ; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 20:23:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from meyer.sydney@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-wm0-x230.google.com (mail-wm0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB349151A for ; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 20:23:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from meyer.sydney@googlemail.com) Received: by mail-wm0-x230.google.com with SMTP id f126so43181038wma.1 for ; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 13:23:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=hu9RMythm1IuUj5mkMIcXGtffAUsSjuO62+/bpSSObQ=; b=haPZev7RMEO6Go8auGUbu1ATJg0bTOKDDavTLb4vXER8N+QEKhPdok5uA+o5/jSbNB G/YHx+gYjq0vq+CWzwA7M/lyaCcuJZ2aQN3CR0a4eykTSfp3868A0j2ekgjq+9iji64R BC60QePbXe+NVrv635RKq7rkFzltbyfwnCumcQ0/RopoUsw5GV5PUo9p5WqYLWY23m6f szduWwomIRwfE802mwGPI8hpqDuWJvJOocyHfqGMTGj+y24CjhJ7qTKbHmxXRIgqoFxR Un4i6FSs0PXIpje4wutILdYudlT/IrPQDAIB/rleW1Vz5iB5KhZxibmE9rOeuSobQjeK Qqgg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=hu9RMythm1IuUj5mkMIcXGtffAUsSjuO62+/bpSSObQ=; b=jEfUFngvBZV3d+lSjg1WoiKTptfq9N03a2dmms75cSBuwbNaLa384kKWphm3NJ5XFF bOGaCRTnr40lXz0DkIikQ5KmxVWbraQbzj4Sfoi6cAriHz5LdMZGSQre4BHz3e+YL31W Mja92oCdmynUzoNk9Phw2pbyEoZGgeJTLS27gQYU3AULBo6Ou7HKF+G3XEHhXj7md3x/ GFhDs8bqLaxwhfgO5fw3ciM5akYVLMqrz5seRUtU9zj5WO8Y7RDf6G2pgoyEfpRRQQQq 68NHyl5w3s6UL/ggdmhVwPTt1UvVIQCc7r8sC6RCC0DGjy2fLweoMvhlVXmmXv1gl4q2 dodg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tIH2YnI2emN0BI9SdQLtFUIhPBkePdLm/IRCES2sGXaHe/EoPF0bCoxJLUl+lI/uQ== X-Received: by 10.28.46.22 with SMTP id u22mr11606781wmu.85.1468441429077; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 13:23:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2a02:a03f:a06:4400:1566:a762:9fc3:b8e4? ([2a02:a03f:a06:4400:1566:a762:9fc3:b8e4]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id t6sm2510200wji.30.2016.07.13.13.23.48 for (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 13 Jul 2016 13:23:48 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\)) Subject: Re: 11n support (more speed) on Intel 3160 - is it better on 7260 or 8260? From: Sydney Meyer In-Reply-To: <1b62836ca3d3252fbe9178ac663d868a@thebighonker.lerctr.org> Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 22:23:47 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <1E209F92-A185-48C3-B3A1-F68AE1C31E5C@googlemail.com> References: <20160713165323.GK59497@pf-bsd.local> <8806959A-936C-4B58-8EEB-4A91849FB181@googlemail.com> <1b62836ca3d3252fbe9178ac663d868a@thebighonker.lerctr.org> To: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124) X-BeenThere: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussions of 802.11 stack, tools device driver development." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 20:23:51 -0000 Yes, this is my bad. I got confused about it appearing on the = 12.0-CURRENT Release Notes. It should have been clear to me as the OP = indeed already wrote, he is using iwn on 11-CURRENT. Sorry for the fuzz. Adrian: Perhaps is it because you're constantly working FreeBSD Wireless = like bwn and other drivers that people think, yeah, this guy must be = getting paid from the Foundation:) > On Jul 13, 2016, at 20:12, Larry Rosenman wrote: >=20 > That is an 11 month old commit..... > On 2016-07-13 12:57, Sydney Meyer via freebsd-wireless wrote: >> Hi, >> there is no 11-CURRENT anymore.. There is a commit to 12.0-CURRENT >> which imports OpenBSD's iwm Driver for newer Intel Chipsets. >> https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=3Drevision&revision=3D286441 >> Sydney >>> On Jul 13, 2016, at 18:53, Petr Fischer wrote: >>> Hello, >>> I have "Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3160NGW" in my Toshiba Z30 = notebook. >>> Under 11-CURRENT, I can connect with 11g (54MBps) only. Is there = some support for 11n (higher speeds) on the road? >>> Can I solve this with upgrade to the 7260 or 8260 wifi cards? Has = these cards better support on 11-CURRENT? >>> 1) >>> = http://www.ebay.com/itm/Intel-Wireless-N-7260NGW-BN-Dual-Band-M-2-NGFF-300= M-BT4-0-WIFI-Card-2-4-5-0GHZ-/201580891333 >>> 2) >>> = http://www.ebay.com/itm/Intel-Wireless-Dual-Band-AC-8260-8260NGW-867Mbps-W= IFI-Card-Bluetooth-4-2-UK-/222173542184 >>> Thanks! pf >>> _______________________________________________ >>> freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org mailing list >>> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-wireless-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org mailing list >> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-wireless-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >=20 > --=20 > Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler > Phone: +1 214-642-9640 E-Mail: ler@lerctr.org > US Mail: 17716 Limpia Crk, Round Rock, TX 78664-7281 From owner-freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Wed Jul 13 20:25:48 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-wireless@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23543B9849C for ; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 20:25:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-it0-x236.google.com (mail-it0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC625157C for ; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 20:25:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com) Received: by mail-it0-x236.google.com with SMTP id f6so53606513ith.0 for ; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 13:25:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=4zyw8eg8zyfbVbblxK+bumFPiZ2S8XNn07xQ413C79Q=; b=Ryt1T0sGTNDsfpF+oH5jNIDlYGoPFoFRai6btapqRSpQeNn/H48eg6OpAm+ZzlieGm fMbxX/4+DffOJf8TPQ6zfi3n34cLGBGFydPIZYtKNa0mALTq+da8ZekDSbBaNGoSABat wpu4+S70jF5lsK0YLCU6cPY7U59LJ1l1HEn+ROTwNyBB3Ej/ByksJG1qmflOAYaLgAwr 04qG/q1wV/BTKtkpr3NxKU2IxmWU8u4LxZ6O+fTaE+wuP1WfBegjRY5mL2BUHvVbBLU8 uqzvL6RlVJoXNBHuBSj9/cx6loqQ3n1McUx2+9NqYQIz8xnMioP8PEEhDu3+8VBYzI5G XSww== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=4zyw8eg8zyfbVbblxK+bumFPiZ2S8XNn07xQ413C79Q=; b=iZuvdFzsNKqngD850sMI1l52A9KC5jmV0ZCkVOGt/OX+Vwv5t/Xw7mqQTOxK7jXi8F E4YjSUAfJ5hAs9+IAd5Gbx62sH+f6Cdvrv81W628ZGz0nNOfSCrpdB0n/7lJIHQczw+b ooXIa1EZ6IucdQNe1dftrUjR6SF9FyWEytJjKTz0u1voVktCXb0+Lgg75McJPxL7lbgv FwZAQea1S6WYrs7UttcXoDDS8GZ1OG1Hbpafo0UGf+BrYxAm6kFBENklUdi9CJVPzPrn Va6EgBshw2LBeTDqbrXSZwb0tESxkYVBgzZy1KIW4KOz3mK1rFluVpw1dhCouhmXMyRw hpVQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tJVRIR+bS+FJMKSB19W2bq244mDh2/4470ulMDmpOlHHlI/T+/Zl92pNaxYmzgxUmtCJT+BWY15KDDbaQ== X-Received: by 10.36.111.72 with SMTP id x69mr10324894itb.71.1468441547119; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 13:25:47 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.36.141.129 with HTTP; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 13:25:46 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1E209F92-A185-48C3-B3A1-F68AE1C31E5C@googlemail.com> References: <20160713165323.GK59497@pf-bsd.local> <8806959A-936C-4B58-8EEB-4A91849FB181@googlemail.com> <1b62836ca3d3252fbe9178ac663d868a@thebighonker.lerctr.org> <1E209F92-A185-48C3-B3A1-F68AE1C31E5C@googlemail.com> From: Adrian Chadd Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 13:25:46 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: 11n support (more speed) on Intel 3160 - is it better on 7260 or 8260? To: Sydney Meyer Cc: "freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussions of 802.11 stack, tools device driver development." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 20:25:48 -0000 Heh, I /pay/ for hardware myself.. wifi is actually costing me money. :) -adrian On 13 July 2016 at 13:23, Sydney Meyer via freebsd-wireless wrote: > Yes, this is my bad. I got confused about it appearing on the 12.0-CURRENT Release Notes. It should have been clear to me as the OP indeed already wrote, he is using iwn on 11-CURRENT. > > Sorry for the fuzz. > > Adrian: Perhaps is it because you're constantly working FreeBSD Wireless like bwn and other drivers that people think, yeah, this guy must be getting paid from the Foundation:) > >> On Jul 13, 2016, at 20:12, Larry Rosenman wrote: >> >> That is an 11 month old commit..... >> On 2016-07-13 12:57, Sydney Meyer via freebsd-wireless wrote: >>> Hi, >>> there is no 11-CURRENT anymore.. There is a commit to 12.0-CURRENT >>> which imports OpenBSD's iwm Driver for newer Intel Chipsets. >>> https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=286441 >>> Sydney >>>> On Jul 13, 2016, at 18:53, Petr Fischer wrote: >>>> Hello, >>>> I have "Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3160NGW" in my Toshiba Z30 notebook. >>>> Under 11-CURRENT, I can connect with 11g (54MBps) only. Is there some support for 11n (higher speeds) on the road? >>>> Can I solve this with upgrade to the 7260 or 8260 wifi cards? Has these cards better support on 11-CURRENT? >>>> 1) >>>> http://www.ebay.com/itm/Intel-Wireless-N-7260NGW-BN-Dual-Band-M-2-NGFF-300M-BT4-0-WIFI-Card-2-4-5-0GHZ-/201580891333 >>>> 2) >>>> http://www.ebay.com/itm/Intel-Wireless-Dual-Band-AC-8260-8260NGW-867Mbps-WIFI-Card-Bluetooth-4-2-UK-/222173542184 >>>> Thanks! pf >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org mailing list >>>> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless >>>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-wireless-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>> _______________________________________________ >>> freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org mailing list >>> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-wireless-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> >> -- >> Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler >> Phone: +1 214-642-9640 E-Mail: ler@lerctr.org >> US Mail: 17716 Limpia Crk, Round Rock, TX 78664-7281 > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-wireless-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Wed Jul 13 20:54:37 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-wireless@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A90BB98F60 for ; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 20:54:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from meyer.sydney@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-wm0-x231.google.com (mail-wm0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2E5E1BC0 for ; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 20:54:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from meyer.sydney@googlemail.com) Received: by mail-wm0-x231.google.com with SMTP id f65so43833605wmi.0 for ; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 13:54:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=GjHc5YQdyxpNoOYu46u1P6yXTLaRgQtJysAEL/k8vLs=; b=DQsujW8l31O6babEgB5jnFylM1y0Wj8q0ts+969Vk56SLPGI6TPGhR3P1ezFJux+ms s+LG4dB+2NhHV+fD/monuPR25q6bgk2C2V1twJLf58niymBGngv4gAwELOgR4/jc0SBN +7pvbnyblVYZ3+0ay4MSZlN1KVtNFigpSTxHcWLTU1/yt2C8C2mjYjn6vE0FkdJKGr9H FxY4BFyYdW9rDyDXAtfstkg5ueGwovDvqBLGDlufvhyZzGpZZieHBV8N2FBYklZI7fr8 ZAmHGIhu4Ev6tlzo2NieJP7KVIz8DqPo7LUDnjBl/7zJO0Y0mxVP/nPvDRygWDkipEaT m/Tg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=GjHc5YQdyxpNoOYu46u1P6yXTLaRgQtJysAEL/k8vLs=; b=Ir/7Al7PAxghY0Wpdhiijb7fWCXtYM4uq6xmdYl3VrgEV8IS3gOJJrLljEduNfbaO7 IYeRe0IBLk91XQ2vnOd1hjdTd+Wbys42Bqekryo6YWEcA5CgLkWt+3ftHXb/PumPkOPk LTnXLMquX4k+kQw9X8E7ygEk/UpElTNgCx+0hH8G7m9H7QVNFnEt6Hty9Cld3f6QprFx ppCc4ZhOpO4gM3TatS10W4G0RTLiMTQeezu8k+9U63jI2LCoHlWuQac7xHxO343yIKNj JaFZO9QHPgUNTiHa/v06I6Ebf1zPVoQM0HAL2cf+A0jaBtp03HCatM6cCVlrp/MiHOEj n2vg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tI7EhfxA0gjmHnp6CfbIxIyapvpJ4/qzVWQXYg8LyF7OrDNCmWS4rfFi7hoW42QAQ== X-Received: by 10.194.231.203 with SMTP id ti11mr2627683wjc.110.1468443274265; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 13:54:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2a02:a03f:a06:4400:1566:a762:9fc3:b8e4? ([2a02:a03f:a06:4400:1566:a762:9fc3:b8e4]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id b200sm13960441wmb.9.2016.07.13.13.54.33 for (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 13 Jul 2016 13:54:33 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\)) Subject: Re: 11n support (more speed) on Intel 3160 - is it better on 7260 or 8260? From: Sydney Meyer In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 22:54:32 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <6E900F65-E555-4311-A722-EAAD4752FFF0@googlemail.com> References: <20160713165323.GK59497@pf-bsd.local> <8806959A-936C-4B58-8EEB-4A91849FB181@googlemail.com> <1b62836ca3d3252fbe9178ac663d868a@thebighonker.lerctr.org> <1E209F92-A185-48C3-B3A1-F68AE1C31E5C@googlemail.com> To: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124) X-BeenThere: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussions of 802.11 stack, tools device driver development." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 20:54:37 -0000 I know that. But, unfortunately, not everybody seems to know and = therefore be able to appreciate this fact, as one can read sometimes on = some superficial sites and forums. Actually, i have seen you in talks = asking for Hardware Donations and i was quite surprised that the = development of e.g. a new wireless driver struggles already at the fact = that one single, capable and willing developer has problems getting even = one single device for which he/she wants to write a driver for. In other = words, you provide, at least in my opinion, an enormous benefit to the = project for free, but it still costs you money, and because of this = state, i can imagine, sometimes nerves too. > On Jul 13, 2016, at 22:25, Adrian Chadd = wrote: >=20 > Heh, I /pay/ for hardware myself.. wifi is actually costing me money. = :) >=20 >=20 >=20 > -adrian >=20 >=20 > On 13 July 2016 at 13:23, Sydney Meyer via freebsd-wireless > wrote: >> Yes, this is my bad. I got confused about it appearing on the = 12.0-CURRENT Release Notes. It should have been clear to me as the OP = indeed already wrote, he is using iwn on 11-CURRENT. >>=20 >> Sorry for the fuzz. >>=20 >> Adrian: Perhaps is it because you're constantly working FreeBSD = Wireless like bwn and other drivers that people think, yeah, this guy = must be getting paid from the Foundation:) >>=20 >>> On Jul 13, 2016, at 20:12, Larry Rosenman wrote: >>>=20 >>> That is an 11 month old commit..... >>> On 2016-07-13 12:57, Sydney Meyer via freebsd-wireless wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> there is no 11-CURRENT anymore.. There is a commit to 12.0-CURRENT >>>> which imports OpenBSD's iwm Driver for newer Intel Chipsets. >>>> https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=3Drevision&revision=3D286441 >>>> Sydney >>>>> On Jul 13, 2016, at 18:53, Petr Fischer = wrote: >>>>> Hello, >>>>> I have "Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3160NGW" in my Toshiba Z30 = notebook. >>>>> Under 11-CURRENT, I can connect with 11g (54MBps) only. Is there = some support for 11n (higher speeds) on the road? >>>>> Can I solve this with upgrade to the 7260 or 8260 wifi cards? Has = these cards better support on 11-CURRENT? >>>>> 1) >>>>> = http://www.ebay.com/itm/Intel-Wireless-N-7260NGW-BN-Dual-Band-M-2-NGFF-300= M-BT4-0-WIFI-Card-2-4-5-0GHZ-/201580891333 >>>>> 2) >>>>> = http://www.ebay.com/itm/Intel-Wireless-Dual-Band-AC-8260-8260NGW-867Mbps-W= IFI-Card-Bluetooth-4-2-UK-/222173542184 >>>>> Thanks! pf >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org mailing list >>>>> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless >>>>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-wireless-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org mailing list >>>> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless >>>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-wireless-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>>=20 >>> -- >>> Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler >>> Phone: +1 214-642-9640 E-Mail: ler@lerctr.org >>> US Mail: 17716 Limpia Crk, Round Rock, TX 78664-7281 >>=20 >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org mailing list >> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-wireless-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Thu Jul 14 00:45:16 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-wireless@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25947B97404 for ; Thu, 14 Jul 2016 00:45:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jonathan.robert.anderson@gmail.com) Received: from mail-io0-x22a.google.com (mail-io0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E6AD91DBF for ; Thu, 14 Jul 2016 00:45:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jonathan.robert.anderson@gmail.com) Received: by mail-io0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id 38so62075328iol.0 for ; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 17:45:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=KYynFYPeyNptZn91Gs1553ZZvh37GID865f6/KQinOI=; b=dRTh4U/YKP4jF60RWqXjSYFE38zHDNw3eu/gjHeUCEeMJA9bR2DQuu2Kdkd3ITsJMi 4zvs4aqd3YhDlx4YpBCAMjVOur8I0a6Ea7zK8mdGGZMYV9ILhCcD1IFI115kg+ewrYj8 L+CZ4CMdAQY8LLvKo8j5WZUHxldLdYGaIjgppL/TeTuy2YV+PyW140Oa6nNluj2Y0XbO de4lth1yV0nNxixjlKyYIna8p3OhTjhb+3PakR3iBp7WiY8Og5ZxxjATsmjHiFNrcdml 6rQcpm0n5c0sdcQG/C1704Izpb0PVf2neZGIvc2xhhzC8ev7w6/sd9VGr6lzQR5/aoLq C90g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=KYynFYPeyNptZn91Gs1553ZZvh37GID865f6/KQinOI=; b=gqUGX5sONjqF6XUWXewBMnze2oEuW5OXvD4L/j1nim60ryGk9MQU3lrp4zmXSJnORI R+KZORUdjKdJnC8/9Vdt+kqe1pKC2+gWbNnd48j6xae2OkHP8woZDu3/sZbufNjNhxrQ gi5Kc/lzKSF1z4JFB4WJ5iO6SQ+q6RS1mQJbHdSE3c01vMg+ZgiN7ccAUAqRkJJ1i9yi UUjzKFeP27DU4Qgldp6Mq2abSFd9wsIbI472T0QpYEnOLxq1yc7SIDtYOc4K3Lyd3cbR f426tqANpWfNoxpasgi5mtoQlx9AkAWmFLbI5jh51qqn+ywByZ/Hnrh9+nLPPIbTcBaz sdlQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tI+kU6vJ2GT9A6X4gVvKpTyNOIj+B3Pyy2YkxduWOjYoK7yQSIu3Z3Y3rbpZH41XQ== X-Received: by 10.107.174.5 with SMTP id x5mr11704577ioe.76.1468457115156; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 17:45:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fogg.jonandchrissy.ca (CPE00fc8db75533-CM00fc8db75530.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com. [99.246.214.46]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j7sm13380721ita.6.2016.07.13.17.45.13 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 13 Jul 2016 17:45:13 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Jonathan Anderson Subject: Re: 11n support (more speed) on Intel 3160 - is it better on 7260 or 8260? To: Adrian Chadd References: <20160713165323.GK59497@pf-bsd.local> <8806959A-936C-4B58-8EEB-4A91849FB181@googlemail.com> <09D2B764-FC66-4783-9EF3-0E7D6DFEDD60@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Sydney Meyer , freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org From: Jonathan Anderson Message-ID: <13c36784-54d3-4e4f-c4db-2787cc79862c@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 22:15:12 -0230 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussions of 802.11 stack, tools device driver development." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2016 00:45:16 -0000 On 07/13/16 17:36, Adrian Chadd wrote: > > Development is 100% volunteer. No one is being paid to do it, so it > happens at the speed of spare time. > Of course... I didn't mean to imply anything like, "you ought to be working harder on this", and I'm sorry if it sounded that way. Your efforts make my FreeBSD notebook much more useful and are very much appreciated! My question was more about the process... are we at a point in the development where PRs are helpful, or is there so much code churn / so few hands that it would just be noise? > If you'd like that changed then please advocate to the foundation > about how important wireless is! > I'll definitely do that the next time I'm at a Foundation booth. :) Jon -- jonathan@FreeBSD.org From owner-freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Fri Jul 15 21:05:22 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-wireless@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F01C7B99C9B for ; Fri, 15 Jul 2016 21:05:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ler@lerctr.org) Received: from thebighonker.lerctr.org (thebighonker.lerctr.org [IPv6:2001:470:1f0f:3ad:223:7dff:fe9e:6e8a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "thebighonker.lerctr.org", Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CE1E7125A for ; Fri, 15 Jul 2016 21:05:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ler@lerctr.org) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lerctr.org; s=lerami; h=Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:MIME-Version:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=AY7gksaVI38oLjASshhDMfLuDYCdBrL05QN0AY+k2Yc=; b=M0XQU3kY0C6H4Zwe7VZ2CKCl4g rl4jkZ9dER1oQgQwsPftBZ6vwC6BxVXBuFvOTe/YkZwMSlNJPf0NFhbHL2WjfVsz6p5E8FzSfVldq zucXt8Ch+ENJpMUy7ITiI4j4GkL3yzDOT/cbSrPdxPNwWarFeT+upNt5IX7abOmBUlck=; Received: from thebighonker.lerctr.org ([2001:470:1f0f:3ad:223:7dff:fe9e:6e8a]:55153 helo=webmail.lerctr.org) by thebighonker.lerctr.org with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.87 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1bOAIU-000Amg-7k for freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org; Fri, 15 Jul 2016 16:05:22 -0500 Received: from proxy.na.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.245.48.73]) by webmail.lerctr.org with HTTP (HTTP/1.1 POST); Fri, 15 Jul 2016 16:05:22 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2016 16:05:22 -0500 From: Larry Rosenman To: Freebsd wireless Subject: ath crashes on pfSense... Message-ID: X-Sender: ler@lerctr.org User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.2.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussions of 802.11 stack, tools device driver development." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2016 21:05:23 -0000 If gotten 3 random crashes on pfSense (2.3.1_5) (based on FreeBSD 10.3): db:0:kdb.enter.default> bt Tracing pid 12 tid 100005 td 0xfffff800032204b0 ar5416PerCalibrationN() at ar5416PerCalibrationN+0x18a/frame 0xfffffe001a37d9e0 ath_calibrate() at ath_calibrate+0x1d3/frame 0xfffffe001a37da30 softclock_call_cc() at softclock_call_cc+0x17b/frame 0xfffffe001a37daf0 softclock() at softclock+0x94/frame 0xfffffe001a37db20 intr_event_execute_handlers() at intr_event_execute_handlers+0xab/frame 0xfffffe001a37db60 ithread_loop() at ithread_loop+0x96/frame 0xfffffe001a37dbb0 fork_exit() at fork_exit+0x9a/frame 0xfffffe001a37dbf0 fork_trampoline() at fork_trampoline+0xe/frame 0xfffffe001a37dbf0 Is this a known issue? What more info do you need? -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 214-642-9640 E-Mail: ler@lerctr.org US Mail: 17716 Limpia Crk, Round Rock, TX 78664-7281 From owner-freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Fri Jul 15 21:06:34 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-wireless@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F0BEB99CC0 for ; Fri, 15 Jul 2016 21:06:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-it0-x22d.google.com (mail-it0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A8FA1298 for ; Fri, 15 Jul 2016 21:06:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com) Received: by mail-it0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id u186so28798826ita.0 for ; Fri, 15 Jul 2016 14:06:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=rjJqcyCWKLH5EPA8x4Zk8X/MzU3Wuh1XMqOTCIRRDBE=; b=AD8NKmMtszK38E9UTbvDuLC/F1x3kxFKO4Oorx59MMXaKjQdn4zUuMOQgXON68A+at udXsjk7Hi8lh3ykIpHqluEvecMhLPQaTu1IxgcB8OZ3KSSEe9oRkgK7blhivIJyGaltQ d0rd6RRbiHE/hhq2n6Ec8PFa2Td897uOPVgaNKz9tzlRNm8GXAsdYHyHLevZmBq0v/9h V4MHKbuHXVNWMoVPLLcr2DZ1rLYgLAd8ABKT0jmcGGfLw9Ad19ywtk/+1z3h31iodsIt JG66HDpHDmv3jwRFXSLeXfFbz3PfC3BGKQ6HBCLFOejqCsHLkiE8SVQSnSmpa9RB6Itl a6NA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=rjJqcyCWKLH5EPA8x4Zk8X/MzU3Wuh1XMqOTCIRRDBE=; b=cW8+JYMhMI5RvwnyNYiLSdCF7N4K/x+HiQkxvk1zq8Mj+TxDVNPq0ugTEGkoPDtoZm D9SJq8YzBYkR3HumzLtCxI0MbpN5g42fOq+Avz8WUCDbNR5tpLElTbqyOuGiwfWLS8vb 0a+KMdbfVgHnrhbXxtTLxN2LgrEizJImjUedVJSLWzq7iwSJ8MLebq7wW7G2SnQFhWRh ZllvDK4M/d1DufLMwNaltrXxQBj2f0YENvWks+2BBwZDXbD8YBze4Q80cv7+UpsiZbEX xsBZ3eAwpRU8QDyJhOe1AU19Q9Iv0EvCjI581patrDqgR5ikjXinUfZ21iy0wc2loMUq EvWA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tINTWBgHix/97AlILF5StYxsbYyK8AKGhifMOw8lpghA9kJ1++/7o+vIPmnrCDsVhMohQ13v+m+TrqtXQ== X-Received: by 10.36.239.197 with SMTP id i188mr17193797ith.71.1468616793891; Fri, 15 Jul 2016 14:06:33 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.36.141.129 with HTTP; Fri, 15 Jul 2016 14:06:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Adrian Chadd Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2016 14:06:33 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: ath crashes on pfSense... To: Larry Rosenman Cc: Freebsd wireless Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussions of 802.11 stack, tools device driver development." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2016 21:06:34 -0000 hi, can you get a coredump and kgdb it? I think this was fixed in -head; I think it's some divide by 0 somewhere.. -a On 15 July 2016 at 14:05, Larry Rosenman wrote: > If gotten 3 random crashes on pfSense (2.3.1_5) (based on FreeBSD 10.3): > > db:0:kdb.enter.default> bt > Tracing pid 12 tid 100005 td 0xfffff800032204b0 > ar5416PerCalibrationN() at ar5416PerCalibrationN+0x18a/frame > 0xfffffe001a37d9e0 > ath_calibrate() at ath_calibrate+0x1d3/frame 0xfffffe001a37da30 > softclock_call_cc() at softclock_call_cc+0x17b/frame 0xfffffe001a37daf0 > softclock() at softclock+0x94/frame 0xfffffe001a37db20 > intr_event_execute_handlers() at intr_event_execute_handlers+0xab/frame > 0xfffffe001a37db60 > ithread_loop() at ithread_loop+0x96/frame 0xfffffe001a37dbb0 > fork_exit() at fork_exit+0x9a/frame 0xfffffe001a37dbf0 > fork_trampoline() at fork_trampoline+0xe/frame 0xfffffe001a37dbf0 > > > Is this a known issue? > > What more info do you need? > > > -- > Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler > Phone: +1 214-642-9640 E-Mail: ler@lerctr.org > US Mail: 17716 Limpia Crk, Round Rock, TX 78664-7281 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-wireless-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Fri Jul 15 21:08:42 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-wireless@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCA1FB99CD5 for ; Fri, 15 Jul 2016 21:08:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ler@lerctr.org) Received: from thebighonker.lerctr.org (thebighonker.lerctr.org [IPv6:2001:470:1f0f:3ad:223:7dff:fe9e:6e8a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "thebighonker.lerctr.org", Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AAC531308 for ; Fri, 15 Jul 2016 21:08:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ler@lerctr.org) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lerctr.org; s=lerami; h=Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Sender:Reply-To: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=ejCrVGdZ5vKTLrvAin5fd7W592js0kxo+fMrUKv4xpU=; b=RzMDHusXa1fAaacZT47HGhlagn fpU9wV8tH5AX5elJ/0b3fcwAGfc8dleW3GVpIHZQKqVXq1m+koFcpVm6IiHxpoqVqxqZgSOlVColN Y/0OXxq1sVDuc44prtkDSm1KbOWvTN81gPZp9t0rHH0fZN1DHEpZ7Vt8MLV7xShX+eus=; Received: from thebighonker.lerctr.org ([2001:470:1f0f:3ad:223:7dff:fe9e:6e8a]:50653 helo=webmail.lerctr.org) by thebighonker.lerctr.org with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.87 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1bOALh-000AtL-TJ; Fri, 15 Jul 2016 16:08:42 -0500 Received: from proxy.na.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.245.48.73]) by webmail.lerctr.org with HTTP (HTTP/1.1 POST); Fri, 15 Jul 2016 16:08:41 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2016 16:08:41 -0500 From: Larry Rosenman To: Adrian Chadd Cc: Freebsd wireless , cmb@pfsense.org Subject: Re: ath crashes on pfSense... In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: X-Sender: ler@lerctr.org User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.2.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussions of 802.11 stack, tools device driver development." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2016 21:08:42 -0000 Unfortunately, no. I don't believe pfSense will allow me to get it. CC'ing Chris over @pfSense On 2016-07-15 16:06, Adrian Chadd wrote: > hi, > > can you get a coredump and kgdb it? I think this was fixed in -head; I > think it's some divide by 0 somewhere.. > > > -a > > > On 15 July 2016 at 14:05, Larry Rosenman wrote: >> If gotten 3 random crashes on pfSense (2.3.1_5) (based on FreeBSD >> 10.3): >> >> db:0:kdb.enter.default> bt >> Tracing pid 12 tid 100005 td 0xfffff800032204b0 >> ar5416PerCalibrationN() at ar5416PerCalibrationN+0x18a/frame >> 0xfffffe001a37d9e0 >> ath_calibrate() at ath_calibrate+0x1d3/frame 0xfffffe001a37da30 >> softclock_call_cc() at softclock_call_cc+0x17b/frame >> 0xfffffe001a37daf0 >> softclock() at softclock+0x94/frame 0xfffffe001a37db20 >> intr_event_execute_handlers() at >> intr_event_execute_handlers+0xab/frame >> 0xfffffe001a37db60 >> ithread_loop() at ithread_loop+0x96/frame 0xfffffe001a37dbb0 >> fork_exit() at fork_exit+0x9a/frame 0xfffffe001a37dbf0 >> fork_trampoline() at fork_trampoline+0xe/frame 0xfffffe001a37dbf0 >> >> >> Is this a known issue? >> >> What more info do you need? >> >> >> -- >> Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler >> Phone: +1 214-642-9640 E-Mail: ler@lerctr.org >> US Mail: 17716 Limpia Crk, Round Rock, TX 78664-7281 >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org mailing list >> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "freebsd-wireless-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 214-642-9640 E-Mail: ler@lerctr.org US Mail: 17716 Limpia Crk, Round Rock, TX 78664-7281 From owner-freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Fri Jul 15 21:27:35 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-wireless@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9FA1B9A045 for ; Fri, 15 Jul 2016 21:27:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cmb@electricsheepfencing.com) Received: from mail-it0-x234.google.com (mail-it0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F4381A05 for ; Fri, 15 Jul 2016 21:27:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cmb@electricsheepfencing.com) Received: by mail-it0-x234.google.com with SMTP id j8so9805161itb.1 for ; Fri, 15 Jul 2016 14:27:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=electricsheepfencing-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=eRx1R+S19+c9NvfGwF2i3/Wg96X7RTGxtSKj4b4b71c=; b=eW8tsSz8TP89ua3/uKmDwSXqGpoCDFp0KyEMEQqEOSk6VqDzctiyM5Tf21L5vzGWiw YChcGZ7jNt2D4b4NctO5Y89t3kWfyeyBtxnUbUIT9BOugPJdFzEy9S8OUNhtLYJkyw1y RKMRAPMmBbdi0kKpCa5zCXpgoxoo2qt3H/EvoOP6lZvwrv48cbP1pjJfx+buL/OCCXdo LRFmiwhWCFYfpVTMCh9Q2zpix8vC3SUohqGPmIalChSf47Ng1qXASctoYQefgsjEMDnx DxpSlqYie6HLVYIf09L0la2cVFat+5JuuWgf5mepWeDFSQTTsDaHi9iKE5w21rrBekuQ d7Dw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=eRx1R+S19+c9NvfGwF2i3/Wg96X7RTGxtSKj4b4b71c=; b=LzzWx6uHKNd4sbtyExr9M9iY1bkLN8h4nGoyTB7F9qm3vrzT255Voep3dZMITN3+Nw rZTUOZwxZXNUk5tjODQSwAAYW6i+G7fXj2K0XdmGRB1JipbxJTDLlKAwy34f+0pnfaYJ Bf/KeLNxQn0wjQ9iOP3J6ZruyRvCBmgl/aRaJZot8HdcMnhbSH0AeaPzafckNvFoniAa j83ga1IPjjLdGD9iDehUd0e3VbDtSM8vjMXoySwzGxeLIjto3hCQNcFUOkTU6E+ss+mE tWFe9berV/RA0StER0oJdDQ3M9lYFYLypl9LjbWq5t8KqW6a0I1Vud3Bn2bs5/oqy/My nv8g== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tI35AR2wQK27f6I/+6kKkJj1r72tSCM7c4grR6kA+gVXFjcR+LEmSyP+o8Qc71ExHQT2YXK4x82ay2RIg== X-Received: by 10.36.44.204 with SMTP id i195mr37993738iti.12.1468618054725; Fri, 15 Jul 2016 14:27:34 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: cmb@electricsheepfencing.com Received: by 10.36.140.9 with HTTP; Fri, 15 Jul 2016 14:27:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Chris Buechler Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2016 16:27:33 -0500 X-Google-Sender-Auth: lSoAp0kmBtH6YrTrg1-291DDrto Message-ID: Subject: Re: ath crashes on pfSense... To: Larry Rosenman Cc: Adrian Chadd , Freebsd wireless Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussions of 802.11 stack, tools device driver development." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2016 21:27:35 -0000 On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 4:08 PM, Larry Rosenman wrote: > Unfortunately, no. I don't believe pfSense will allow me to get it. > You can get it out of /var/crash/ before submitting the crash report. We'll have 2.4 snapshots based on FreeBSD 11 out soon, that's probably your best bet to see if it's fixed. From owner-freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Sat Jul 16 10:12:50 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-wireless@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E140B9A554 for ; Sat, 16 Jul 2016 10:12:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andrew@ugh.net.au) Received: from kaija.ugh.net.au (kaija.ugh.net.au [IPv6:2a00:1a48:7803:107:65bc:4bde:ff08:1f7f]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3DF91692 for ; Sat, 16 Jul 2016 10:12:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andrew@ugh.net.au) Received: from [10.0.1.12] (77-64-196-138.dynamic.primacom.net [77.64.196.138]) by kaija.ugh.net.au (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DC68BA66A for ; Sat, 16 Jul 2016 10:12:41 +0000 (UTC) From: Andrew Stevenson Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: bf_next not NULL! Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2016 12:12:40 +0200 Message-Id: <2DEF8DBE-1444-435C-B48C-FEAB71CA60E5@ugh.net.au> To: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1085) X-BeenThere: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussions of 802.11 stack, tools device driver development." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2016 10:12:50 -0000 Hi, I have an Atheros 9227 card in AP mode. It looks like there is some = packet loss at the wireless layer, resulting in large delays at the IP = layer. Also, every few days, nothing seems to be able to associate. = Restarting the interface (/etc/rc.d/netif restart wlan0) fixes that but = the possible packet loss remains. I notice quite numerous errors in dmesg. Bursts of: ath0: ath_tx_default_comp: bf 0xfffffe0000826aa0: seqno 550: bf_next not = NULL! ath0: ath_tx_default_comp: bf 0xfffffe0000831d20: seqno 551: bf_next not = NULL! ath0: ath_tx_default_comp: bf 0xfffffe0000827298: seqno 552: bf_next not = NULL! ath0: ath_tx_default_comp: bf 0xfffffe0000815bb0: seqno 553: bf_next not = NULL! ath0: ath_tx_default_comp: bf 0xfffffe0000821160: seqno 554: bf_next not = NULL! That can go on for about 20 lines, plus the ubiquitous: ath0: stuck beacon; resetting (bmiss count 4) ath0: stuck beacon; resetting (bmiss count 4) ath0: stuck beacon; resetting (bmiss count 4) that seems to be pretty regular. My card from dmesg: ath0: mem 0x48100000-0x4810ffff irq 21 at device 0.0 on = pci4 ath0: [HT] enabling HT modes ath0: [HT] enabling short-GI in 20MHz mode ath0: [HT] 1 stream STBC receive enabled ath0: [HT] 1 stream STBC transmit enabled ath0: [HT] 2 RX streams; 2 TX streams ath0: Enabling register serialisation ath0: AR9227 mac 384.2 RF5133 phy 15.15 ath0: 2GHz radio: 0x0000; 5GHz radio: 0x00c0 And ifconfig output: wlan0: flags=3D8843 metric 0 mtu = 1500 ether 64:70:02:f0:c8:03 inet 10.0.1.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 10.0.1.255=20 inet6 fe80::6670:2ff:fef0:c803%wlan0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x6=20 nd6 options=3D61 media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet autoselect mode 11g = status: running ssid UgH channel 11 (2462 MHz 11g) bssid 64:70:02:f0:c8:03 regdomain ETSI country DE indoor ecm authmode WPA2/802.11i privacy MIXED deftxkey 3 AES-CCM 2:128-bit AES-CCM 3:128-bit txpower 30 scanvalid 60 protmode CTS wme burst dtimperiod 1 -dfs I had previously been using 11ng but have just tried switching to see if = 11g had the same problems (it seems to). I'm running 10.3-STABLE r302736. Any ideas? Thanks, Andrew= From owner-freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Sat Jul 16 10:59:19 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-wireless@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BAC1B9B4BE for ; Sat, 16 Jul 2016 10:59:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Willem@Offermans.Rompen.nl) Received: from cpsmtpb-ews06.kpnxchange.com (cpsmtpb-ews06.kpnxchange.com [213.75.39.9]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA481113D for ; Sat, 16 Jul 2016 10:59:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Willem@Offermans.Rompen.nl) Received: from cpsps-ews16.kpnxchange.com ([10.94.84.197]) by cpsmtpb-ews06.kpnxchange.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.17514); Sat, 16 Jul 2016 12:59:11 +0200 Received: from CPSMTPM-CMT103.kpnxchange.com ([195.121.3.19]) by cpsps-ews16.kpnxchange.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.17514); Sat, 16 Jul 2016 12:59:11 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=kpnmail.nl; s=kpnmail01; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1468666751; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=Tb5q7H9xU6i1FfQzSiCVIstadHdJXsFVQlCiDLJ3bXQ=; b=X2iS0oRQQ79iEGpxTMldpdch8MsrV/wmS3OhM1AaWO7ETUbOnuPELma/YBui/lGI4t39+lHeBjn sFONfGc3CcS00adT+VCN9DatokwPgG5Q9YFximvsvIjFLRjw/KGExXfTYrN3YFUs9UJBcHn37dp5D 6We8FZx0rzak9lduocU= Received: from donald.offrom.nl ([77.164.21.27]) by CPSMTPM-CMT103.kpnxchange.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.0.6002.18264); Sat, 16 Jul 2016 12:59:10 +0200 Received: from squid (squid.vpn.offrom.nl [10.168.0.72]) by donald.offrom.nl (8.15.2/8.14.9) with ESMTPS id u6GAwobb049245 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Sat, 16 Jul 2016 12:58:54 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from Willem@Offermans.Rompen.nl) Received: from willy by squid with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1bONIy-0001f0-SL; Sat, 16 Jul 2016 12:58:44 +0200 Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2016 12:58:43 +0200 From: Willem Offermans To: Andrew Stevenson Cc: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bf_next not NULL! Message-ID: <20160716105843.GA5832@vpn.offrom.nl> Reply-To: Willem@Offermans.Rompen.nl References: <2DEF8DBE-1444-435C-B48C-FEAB71CA60E5@ugh.net.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <2DEF8DBE-1444-435C-B48C-FEAB71CA60E5@ugh.net.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on donald.offrom.nl X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 Jul 2016 10:59:11.0037 (UTC) FILETIME=[15224ED0:01D1DF51] X-RcptDomain: freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussions of 802.11 stack, tools device driver development." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2016 10:59:19 -0000 Hello FreeBSD friends, On Sat, Jul 16, 2016 at 12:12:40PM +0200, Andrew Stevenson wrote: > Hi, > > I have an Atheros 9227 card in AP mode. It looks like there is some packet loss at the wireless layer, resulting in large delays at the IP layer. Also, every few days, nothing seems to be able to associate. Restarting the interface (/etc/rc.d/netif restart wlan0) fixes that but the possible packet loss remains. > > I notice quite numerous errors in dmesg. Bursts of: > > ath0: ath_tx_default_comp: bf 0xfffffe0000826aa0: seqno 550: bf_next not NULL! > ath0: ath_tx_default_comp: bf 0xfffffe0000831d20: seqno 551: bf_next not NULL! > ath0: ath_tx_default_comp: bf 0xfffffe0000827298: seqno 552: bf_next not NULL! > ath0: ath_tx_default_comp: bf 0xfffffe0000815bb0: seqno 553: bf_next not NULL! > ath0: ath_tx_default_comp: bf 0xfffffe0000821160: seqno 554: bf_next not NULL! > > That can go on for about 20 lines, plus the ubiquitous: > > ath0: stuck beacon; resetting (bmiss count 4) > ath0: stuck beacon; resetting (bmiss count 4) > ath0: stuck beacon; resetting (bmiss count 4) > > that seems to be pretty regular. > > My card from dmesg: > > ath0: mem 0x48100000-0x4810ffff irq 21 at device 0.0 on pci4 > ath0: [HT] enabling HT modes > ath0: [HT] enabling short-GI in 20MHz mode > ath0: [HT] 1 stream STBC receive enabled > ath0: [HT] 1 stream STBC transmit enabled > ath0: [HT] 2 RX streams; 2 TX streams > ath0: Enabling register serialisation > ath0: AR9227 mac 384.2 RF5133 phy 15.15 > ath0: 2GHz radio: 0x0000; 5GHz radio: 0x00c0 > > And ifconfig output: > > wlan0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 > ether 64:70:02:f0:c8:03 > inet 10.0.1.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 10.0.1.255 > inet6 fe80::6670:2ff:fef0:c803%wlan0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x6 > nd6 options=61 > media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet autoselect mode 11g > status: running > ssid UgH channel 11 (2462 MHz 11g) bssid 64:70:02:f0:c8:03 > regdomain ETSI country DE indoor ecm authmode WPA2/802.11i > privacy MIXED deftxkey 3 AES-CCM 2:128-bit AES-CCM 3:128-bit > txpower 30 scanvalid 60 protmode CTS wme burst dtimperiod 1 -dfs > > I had previously been using 11ng but have just tried switching to see if 11g had the same problems (it seems to). > > I'm running 10.3-STABLE r302736. > > Any ideas? > > Thanks, > Maybe it is not related, maybe it is..... I tried to use an Atheros AR938x card in AP mode on FreeBSD 10.3, r302295 and 11.0, r297415 for quite some time now. Of course I got the ``ath0: stuck beacon; resetting (bmiss count 4)`` over and over again. Beside this, I also observed the following messages: Jul 12 11:15:47 kwik kernel: ath0: ath_edma_tx_processq: Q3: empty? Jul 12 11:15:47 kwik kernel: ath0: ath_edma_tx_processq: Q3: empty? Jul 12 12:13:33 kwik kernel: ath0: ath_edma_recv_tasklet: sc_inreset_cnt > 0; skipping Jul 12 15:10:19 kwik kernel: ath0: ath_edma_recv_tasklet: sc_inreset_cnt > 0; skipping Jul 12 16:10:32 kwik kernel: ath0: ath_edma_recv_tasklet: sc_inreset_cnt > 0; skipping Jul 12 18:40:01 kwik kernel: ath0: ath_edma_recv_tasklet: sc_inreset_cnt > 0; skipping Jul 12 18:42:36 kwik kernel: ath0: ath_edma_recv_tasklet: sc_inreset_cnt > 0; skipping Jul 12 19:52:05 kwik kernel: ath0: ath_edma_recv_tasklet: sc_inreset_cnt > 0; skipping Jul 12 20:11:45 kwik kernel: ath0: ath_edma_recv_tasklet: sc_inreset_cnt > 0; skipping and Jun 9 07:37:57 kwik kernel: ath0: stuck beacon; resetting (bmiss count 4) Jun 9 22:21:35 kwik kernel: ath0: hardware error; resetting Jun 9 22:21:35 kwik kernel: ath0: 0x00000000 0x00000000 0x00000000, 0x00000000 0x00000000 0x00000000 Jun 9 22:21:35 kwik kernel: ath0: hardware error; resetting Jun 9 22:21:35 kwik kernel: ath0: 0x00000000 0x00000000 0x00000000, 0x00000000 0x00000000 0x00000000 Jun 9 23:07:35 kwik kernel: ath0: stuck beacon; resetting (bmiss count 4) The Wifi was so unstable that I looked for a different solution. My card from dmesg: ath0: mem 0xfbfe0000-0xfbffffff irq 16 at device 0.0 on pci1 ar9300_attach: calling ar9300_hw_attach ar9300_hw_attach: calling ar9300_eeprom_attach ar9300_flash_map: unimplemented for now Restoring Cal data from DRAM Restoring Cal data from EEPROM ar9300_hw_attach: ar9300_eeprom_attach returned 0 ath0: [HT] enabling HT modes ath0: [HT] enabling short-GI in 20MHz mode ath0: [HT] 1 stream STBC receive enabled ath0: [HT] 1 stream STBC transmit enabled ath0: [HT] 3 RX streams; 3 TX streams ath0: AR9380 mac 448.3 RF5110 phy 3779.2 ath0: 2GHz radio: 0x0000; 5GHz radio: 0x0000 wlan0: flags=8c43 metric 0 mtu 1500 ether c4:6e:1f:1e:b6:32 inet 192.168.5.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.5.255 nd6 options=29 media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet autoselect mode 11ng (autoselect) status: no carrier ssid MyWirelessSSID channel 108 (5540 MHz 11a) regdomain ETSI country indoor ecm authmode OPEN privacy OFF txpower 23 bmiss 7 mcastrate 6 mgmtrate 6 scanvalid 60 wme burst bintval 0 groups: wlan From owner-freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Sat Jul 16 15:51:05 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-wireless@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E35B5B9B090 for ; Sat, 16 Jul 2016 15:51:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-it0-x229.google.com (mail-it0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD718186E for ; Sat, 16 Jul 2016 15:51:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com) Received: by mail-it0-x229.google.com with SMTP id f6so41015111ith.1 for ; Sat, 16 Jul 2016 08:51:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=cjqqQEtj17jJ20hQb1/XF1ZqQGXmq8dGdI7jlTIQViw=; b=CoZkerUOJ7Y1cVKXJQId0FDFZY+Aee3foYzsbl+rA9rmVec/qy+PqBAvwIoE42BLzZ amAR3xcbCuxyO82rku0yqprBCLqfPCrm4dg9k++abxnM8WVRpi4HDHrbktGanPnvmwIX zzYCDNe9twCtysNbt2aoN1CLDN4UwWxAyPw5i9EH2GT4Tv66jlD/lXDWVOQaWk4Mzd49 n1kdo+SVWXWQwds6++Czky75kwHLGrzlHQPaVKOtq/nxVAMpvqkv0oy+RbJi1psbcdDX MlNOQbkXi2sXPVLnejze3kMmOrXz22W6JggYrmXiMoe2gGTGE4LqAubp1CRisOXIblcG 3Zjg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=cjqqQEtj17jJ20hQb1/XF1ZqQGXmq8dGdI7jlTIQViw=; b=j8qz54tdXrAqIGtDPFu0sU8G9QFHLO5grMgE7oUg2UIUVju03+pTzC4n6GV6ZiLPz7 Y1Jof8LaHJpV+uGxSQo0OpRX0mIgBrzgE+0XOYaUrwkdC5wOW5Tmms7raHC1ZlIsKcgk v3q4NcnRO96+uLpBi6yey+FrZKRaodhRN4gVzsFwXOJol97eWq+Jwpw3wVDmWvVOTryU rzC6wP6LMr/2qMHvLVcOG+Rogw27SBWN1BHvyZRP1Vo55+wI1Km41PqNucfVsIohtT5V oEJy6PlLVSQZHQ0Ms7tUnqVy9/absYkYkkPMrDsYYZWzusz43j+kJBNYy2f1NMTk8yEQ XIEg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tJ7JrZg52jGDeJGNbNgMrm3r9BXLW17+28BybO3GZEeKolrQvzXtcu+uzo1fl1l5yzd0bKZKgLcqdc6rA== X-Received: by 10.36.111.72 with SMTP id x69mr25584341itb.71.1468684264804; Sat, 16 Jul 2016 08:51:04 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.36.141.129 with HTTP; Sat, 16 Jul 2016 08:51:04 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20160716105843.GA5832@vpn.offrom.nl> References: <2DEF8DBE-1444-435C-B48C-FEAB71CA60E5@ugh.net.au> <20160716105843.GA5832@vpn.offrom.nl> From: Adrian Chadd Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2016 08:51:04 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bf_next not NULL! To: Willem@offermans.rompen.nl Cc: Andrew Stevenson , "freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussions of 802.11 stack, tools device driver development." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2016 15:51:06 -0000 hi! both of these should be fixed in stable/11 :) -adrian On 16 July 2016 at 03:58, Willem Offermans wro= te: > Hello FreeBSD friends, > > On Sat, Jul 16, 2016 at 12:12:40PM +0200, Andrew Stevenson wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I have an Atheros 9227 card in AP mode. It looks like there is some pack= et loss at the wireless layer, resulting in large delays at the IP layer. A= lso, every few days, nothing seems to be able to associate. Restarting the = interface (/etc/rc.d/netif restart wlan0) fixes that but the possible packe= t loss remains. >> >> I notice quite numerous errors in dmesg. Bursts of: >> >> ath0: ath_tx_default_comp: bf 0xfffffe0000826aa0: seqno 550: bf_next not= NULL! >> ath0: ath_tx_default_comp: bf 0xfffffe0000831d20: seqno 551: bf_next not= NULL! >> ath0: ath_tx_default_comp: bf 0xfffffe0000827298: seqno 552: bf_next not= NULL! >> ath0: ath_tx_default_comp: bf 0xfffffe0000815bb0: seqno 553: bf_next not= NULL! >> ath0: ath_tx_default_comp: bf 0xfffffe0000821160: seqno 554: bf_next not= NULL! >> >> That can go on for about 20 lines, plus the ubiquitous: >> >> ath0: stuck beacon; resetting (bmiss count 4) >> ath0: stuck beacon; resetting (bmiss count 4) >> ath0: stuck beacon; resetting (bmiss count 4) >> >> that seems to be pretty regular. >> >> My card from dmesg: >> >> ath0: mem 0x48100000-0x4810ffff irq 21 at device 0.0 on p= ci4 >> ath0: [HT] enabling HT modes >> ath0: [HT] enabling short-GI in 20MHz mode >> ath0: [HT] 1 stream STBC receive enabled >> ath0: [HT] 1 stream STBC transmit enabled >> ath0: [HT] 2 RX streams; 2 TX streams >> ath0: Enabling register serialisation >> ath0: AR9227 mac 384.2 RF5133 phy 15.15 >> ath0: 2GHz radio: 0x0000; 5GHz radio: 0x00c0 >> >> And ifconfig output: >> >> wlan0: flags=3D8843 metric 0 mtu= 1500 >> ether 64:70:02:f0:c8:03 >> inet 10.0.1.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 10.0.1.255 >> inet6 fe80::6670:2ff:fef0:c803%wlan0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x6 >> nd6 options=3D61 >> media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet autoselect mode 11g >> status: running >> ssid UgH channel 11 (2462 MHz 11g) bssid 64:70:02:f0:c8:03 >> regdomain ETSI country DE indoor ecm authmode WPA2/802.11i >> privacy MIXED deftxkey 3 AES-CCM 2:128-bit AES-CCM 3:128-bit >> txpower 30 scanvalid 60 protmode CTS wme burst dtimperiod 1 -dfs >> >> I had previously been using 11ng but have just tried switching to see if= 11g had the same problems (it seems to). >> >> I'm running 10.3-STABLE r302736. >> >> Any ideas? >> >> Thanks, >> > > Maybe it is not related, maybe it is..... I tried to use an Atheros AR938= x > card in AP mode on FreeBSD 10.3, r302295 and 11.0, r297415 for quite some > time now. Of course I got the ``ath0: stuck beacon; resetting (bmiss coun= t > 4)`` over and over again. Beside this, I also observed the following > messages: > > Jul 12 11:15:47 kwik kernel: ath0: ath_edma_tx_processq: Q3: empty? > Jul 12 11:15:47 kwik kernel: ath0: ath_edma_tx_processq: Q3: empty? > Jul 12 12:13:33 kwik kernel: ath0: ath_edma_recv_tasklet: sc_inreset_cnt = > 0; skipping > Jul 12 15:10:19 kwik kernel: ath0: ath_edma_recv_tasklet: sc_inreset_cnt = > 0; skipping > Jul 12 16:10:32 kwik kernel: ath0: ath_edma_recv_tasklet: sc_inreset_cnt = > 0; skipping > Jul 12 18:40:01 kwik kernel: ath0: ath_edma_recv_tasklet: sc_inreset_cnt = > 0; skipping > Jul 12 18:42:36 kwik kernel: ath0: ath_edma_recv_tasklet: sc_inreset_cnt = > 0; skipping > Jul 12 19:52:05 kwik kernel: ath0: ath_edma_recv_tasklet: sc_inreset_cnt = > 0; skipping > Jul 12 20:11:45 kwik kernel: ath0: ath_edma_recv_tasklet: sc_inreset_cnt = > 0; skipping > > and > > Jun 9 07:37:57 kwik kernel: ath0: stuck beacon; resetting (bmiss count 4= ) > Jun 9 22:21:35 kwik kernel: ath0: hardware error; resetting > Jun 9 22:21:35 kwik kernel: ath0: 0x00000000 0x00000000 0x00000000, 0x00= 000000 0x00000000 0x00000000 > Jun 9 22:21:35 kwik kernel: ath0: hardware error; resetting > Jun 9 22:21:35 kwik kernel: ath0: 0x00000000 0x00000000 0x00000000, 0x00= 000000 0x00000000 0x00000000 > Jun 9 23:07:35 kwik kernel: ath0: stuck beacon; resetting (bmiss count 4= ) > > The Wifi was so unstable that I looked for a different solution. > > > My card from dmesg: > > ath0: mem 0xfbfe0000-0xfbffffff irq 16 at device 0.0 on = pci1 > ar9300_attach: calling ar9300_hw_attach > ar9300_hw_attach: calling ar9300_eeprom_attach > ar9300_flash_map: unimplemented for now > Restoring Cal data from DRAM > Restoring Cal data from EEPROM > ar9300_hw_attach: ar9300_eeprom_attach returned 0 > ath0: [HT] enabling HT modes > ath0: [HT] enabling short-GI in 20MHz mode > ath0: [HT] 1 stream STBC receive enabled > ath0: [HT] 1 stream STBC transmit enabled > ath0: [HT] 3 RX streams; 3 TX streams > ath0: AR9380 mac 448.3 RF5110 phy 3779.2 > ath0: 2GHz radio: 0x0000; 5GHz radio: 0x0000 > > wlan0: flags=3D8c43 metri= c 0 mtu 1500 > ether c4:6e:1f:1e:b6:32 > inet 192.168.5.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.5.255 > nd6 options=3D29 > media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet autoselect mode 11ng (autose= lect) > status: no carrier > ssid MyWirelessSSID channel 108 (5540 MHz 11a) > regdomain ETSI country indoor ecm authmode OPEN privacy OFF > txpower 23 bmiss 7 mcastrate 6 mgmtrate 6 scanvalid 60 wme burst > bintval 0 > groups: wlan > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-wireless-unsubscribe@freebsd.or= g" From owner-freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Sat Jul 16 15:52:06 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-wireless@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DC6DB9B16C for ; Sat, 16 Jul 2016 15:52:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-it0-x233.google.com (mail-it0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD7B51A58 for ; Sat, 16 Jul 2016 15:52:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com) Received: by mail-it0-x233.google.com with SMTP id f6so41025990ith.1 for ; Sat, 16 Jul 2016 08:52:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to; bh=EBSSQ/k1Xy+Gn2kRbHIbmhJ6/z6835OY9deec7i+JkU=; b=B0da1zJfJge7db38zC0AyWdgqlq63yMdUm8TNW3cCS7pc9dAp3LX+xVERutDuxSMjs jKe7TEAwPSG46pC0X1G0wFweosHvkTYai1Zjk/6kNGPF+8sq1msVmF1z+L/SPx6XHR4N U6IN/6kroEKsmg8M8Ps3B/neVhBseMTmllr6TnlbzbgCvVoQZI9F0Y5nLmp1hmMwl31b M0VBqk2TIJOAH7aqkV034gwuW0xqpqPOD7Oj32zb9cmmKSfUPhc6Z2cYIKzxbhb/xBqn kWXGQ9I6Med8HVtZOxG0YtJO9x+YM0hFZGsRiJh2sVHAuTnZnI4J/38tCuCIznz2BhTq ey9w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to; bh=EBSSQ/k1Xy+Gn2kRbHIbmhJ6/z6835OY9deec7i+JkU=; b=mSnq1TaoTJOKuuM3X8RNVHhpvuEtcUO3Ep065Cz+f6R8SrlZqK1+OLS5cpHx8WoFnL Kr2ILxSLXvTsOkJq+svcKmfaPXqAsJzr0yaVHz9s5rFDlYiJnQol0hdR4ZK8501ELJf2 3/X6Sr8NBa9lm9hzIPqbhNPNwnKUIykVfxWwWGOGUwKMRLEOoqIgUlGaIik7dT6kl+Rd AdZJgtjKY5yBuDOY7dK1xsd75d9XqkkbX5O51BSTwo9z+zdoLuURXPRg54kv+0He5PE8 OzVQTE7qce9fv0XpKY7qr47ja+gbzuuQ2hQo0lGZJgDulY5qTNC+U2X+LUYeUKU4yCTY 8Npw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tKGHXVBVLO9mWEw4RcIN1Oi1GyQV5EUoesh9rf1Bi4pjY9B6dgASRyi9Q3t8NW013lZqPxUP3XpVNJE3w== X-Received: by 10.36.239.197 with SMTP id i188mr20481475ith.71.1468684325278; Sat, 16 Jul 2016 08:52:05 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: adrian.chadd@gmail.com Received: by 10.36.141.129 with HTTP; Sat, 16 Jul 2016 08:52:04 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20160716093010.GA50786@lyxys.ka.sub.org> References: <20160709190147.GA6767@lyxys.ka.sub.org> <20160710174746.GA29034@lyxys.ka.sub.org> <20160710175300.GB29034@lyxys.ka.sub.org> <20160714213758.GA17141@lyxys.ka.sub.org> <20160715202803.GA38281@lyxys.ka.sub.org> <20160716093010.GA50786@lyxys.ka.sub.org> From: Adrian Chadd Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2016 08:52:04 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: xw-pYW6Grt0qnwILTOGeiUaTLgg Message-ID: Subject: Re: ath (AR9460) no longer works after going to 11-STABLE r302483 To: Wolfgang Zenker , "freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussions of 802.11 stack, tools device driver development." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2016 15:52:06 -0000 ... I'm confused as to what's going on.. :) -a On 16 July 2016 at 02:30, Wolfgang Zenker wrote: > Hi, > > * Adrian Chadd [160715 22:40]: >> On 15 July 2016 at 13:28, Wolfgang Zenker wrote: >>> * Adrian Chadd [160715 00:00]: >>>> On 14 July 2016 at 14:37, Wolfgang Zenker wrote: >>>>> * Adrian Chadd [160710 21:47]: >>>>>> Since you've reverted the ath driver directories without success, I'm >>>>>> mostly out of simple ideas. I think you need to bisect the whole >>>>>> kernel version until you find the commit that broke things. > >>>>> done. The commit is 11-STABLE r302410. AFAICS the only change here >>>>> is the removal of debugging options from the GENERIC kernel config: > >>>>> https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/stable/11/sys/amd64/conf/GENERIC?r1=302408&r2=302410 > >>>> ... loool, okay. Let me see. > >>>> Try INVARIANTS and INVARIANT_SUPPORT. Maybe something in the ath >>>> driver needs it.. oops! > >>> Nope, wlan0 still works after disabling INVARIANTS and INVARIANT_SUPPORT. >>> Any suggestions for next try? > >> Just try disabling the others and see what happens. > > commenting out DEADLKRES and MALLOC_DEBUG_MAXZONES in addition to > INVARIANTS and INVARIANT_SUPPORT did not change the situation: ath > still worked. Re-enabling all of the above and disabling WITNESS > resulted in ath failing. > > Wolfgang From owner-freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Sat Jul 16 18:28:01 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-wireless@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 122C2B9B74C for ; Sat, 16 Jul 2016 18:28:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 01ECC1D08 for ; Sat, 16 Jul 2016 18:28:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u6GIRxMU069939 for ; Sat, 16 Jul 2016 18:28:00 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-wireless@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 203745] A2DP Support for Bluetooth Headphone Audio Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2016 18:28:00 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: wireless X-Bugzilla-Version: CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: danfe@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-wireless@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussions of 802.11 stack, tools device driver development." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2016 18:28:01 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D203745 Alexey Dokuchaev changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |danfe@FreeBSD.org --- Comment #32 from Alexey Dokuchaev --- (In reply to Hans Petter Selasky from comment #3) These instructions worked perfectly for my combination of FreeBSD 8.4 and L= eme EB30A headphones. However, music playback has occasional hiccups despite unloaded CPU and that distance between devices was minimal and unobstructed; any ideas what might be causing them? (They do not occur when feeding sound from a smartphone AFAICT.) Another issue I had was with volume control. By default it is set to 128 (returned correctly by issuing SNDCTL_DSP_GETPLAYVOL ioctl() call), and loo= king at virtual-oss code it should support SNDCTL_DSP_SETPLAYVOL as well, but it didn't for me (volume always remains 128). Apart of that, great work Hans, thanks! --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Sat Jul 16 19:02:12 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-wireless@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 371DAB9A09E for ; Sat, 16 Jul 2016 19:02:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andrew@ugh.net.au) Received: from kaija.ugh.net.au (kaija.ugh.net.au [IPv6:2a00:1a48:7803:107:65bc:4bde:ff08:1f7f]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09D6912AC for ; Sat, 16 Jul 2016 19:02:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andrew@ugh.net.au) Received: from [10.0.1.12] (77-64-196-135.dynamic.primacom.net [77.64.196.135]) by kaija.ugh.net.au (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7171CA6E0; Sat, 16 Jul 2016 19:01:58 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: bf_next not NULL! Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Andrew Stevenson In-Reply-To: Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2016 21:01:56 +0200 Cc: Willem@offermans.rompen.nl, "freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <195C101A-E690-4B71-8806-4FDEA6B0757D@ugh.net.au> References: <2DEF8DBE-1444-435C-B48C-FEAB71CA60E5@ugh.net.au> <20160716105843.GA5832@vpn.offrom.nl> To: Adrian Chadd X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1085) X-BeenThere: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussions of 802.11 stack, tools device driver development." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2016 19:02:12 -0000 On 16 Jul 2016, at 17:51, Adrian Chadd wrote: > hi! > > both of these should be fixed in stable/11 :) Excellent. Time for an upgrade then I guess :-) Thanks very much! Andrew