From owner-freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Tue May 17 09:43:10 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9327B3E472 for ; Tue, 17 May 2016 09:43:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from prvs=938cbf5a0=roger.pau@citrix.com) Received: from SMTP.CITRIX.COM (smtp.citrix.com [66.165.176.89]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.citrix.com", Issuer "Verizon Public SureServer CA G14-SHA2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9AE2917A9 for ; Tue, 17 May 2016 09:43:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from prvs=938cbf5a0=roger.pau@citrix.com) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.26,324,1459814400"; d="scan'208";a="354714199" Date: Tue, 17 May 2016 11:43:01 +0200 From: Roger Pau =?iso-8859-1?Q?Monn=E9?= To: Miguel C CC: "freebsd-xen@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: xn ethernet issues as DOMU under NetBSD DOM0 FIXED! Message-ID: <20160517094301.h4oa4nyyakbj7r3h@mac> References: <20160512162247.64x5hyud5i2jfgqy@mac> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.0-neo (2016-04-07) X-DLP: MIA1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 May 2016 09:43:10 -0000 On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 08:32:43PM +0100, Miguel C wrote: > Somewhat related to this is the fact that at some point "xenhvm" as not > longer available as a module, this means if I want to upgrade 9.3 machine > to 10.3 with freebsd-update I get stuck with the bug, but before this > change I could just patch the xenhvm module and rebuild the single module... With previous FreeBSD 9.X versions, in order to get Xen support you had to compile a specific kernel (XENHVM), we wanted to remove this for FreeBSD 10, so we included the Xen components into the GENERIC kernel and made sure there were no weird interactions on bare metal. However, this change was too big to merge into 9, so in order to try to improve the situation on 9 Colin decided to pack all the Xen support into a kernel module, in order to remove the need to compile a specific kernel for Xen VMs. And I guess if you want to update from 9.X to 10.X you will have to remove the xenhvm_load="YES" from your loader file. > Now I guess I need to rebuild the full kernel to do it? Or is there a way > around that? Yes, on 10.X you will have to rebuild the full kernel in order to get the fix. Roger. From owner-freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Tue May 17 10:17:14 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1530BB3EC18 for ; Tue, 17 May 2016 10:17:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: from kib.kiev.ua (kib.kiev.ua [IPv6:2001:470:d5e7:1::1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 873FF17F7 for ; Tue, 17 May 2016 10:17:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: from tom.home (kib@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kib.kiev.ua (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id u4HAH1Vl041291 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 17 May 2016 13:17:01 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 kib.kiev.ua u4HAH1Vl041291 Received: (from kostik@localhost) by tom.home (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id u4HAH0YX041290; Tue, 17 May 2016 13:17:00 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) X-Authentication-Warning: tom.home: kostik set sender to kostikbel@gmail.com using -f Date: Tue, 17 May 2016 13:17:00 +0300 From: Konstantin Belousov To: Roger Pau Monn? Cc: "freebsd-xen@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: xn ethernet issues as DOMU under NetBSD DOM0 FIXED! Message-ID: <20160517101700.GB89104@kib.kiev.ua> References: <20160512162247.64x5hyud5i2jfgqy@mac> <20160517094301.h4oa4nyyakbj7r3h@mac> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160517094301.h4oa4nyyakbj7r3h@mac> User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,FREEMAIL_FROM,NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on tom.home X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 May 2016 10:17:14 -0000 On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 11:43:01AM +0200, Roger Pau Monn? wrote: > With previous FreeBSD 9.X versions, in order to get Xen support you had to > compile a specific kernel (XENHVM), we wanted to remove this for FreeBSD 10, > so we included the Xen components into the GENERIC kernel and made sure > there were no weird interactions on bare metal. However, this change was > too big to merge into 9, so in order to try to improve the situation on 9 > Colin decided to pack all the Xen support into a kernel module, in order to > remove the need to compile a specific kernel for Xen VMs. Why the module is a bad idea on HEAD/10.x ? To explain further, I do not object against Xen code included into GENERIC. I am interested in the possibility of the stripped down kernel (without XEN options) which can be made operable on HVM with the module preloaded. From owner-freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Tue May 17 10:46:38 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22939B3F45A for ; Tue, 17 May 2016 10:46:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from prvs=938cbf5a0=roger.pau@citrix.com) Received: from SMTP.CITRIX.COM (smtp.citrix.com [66.165.176.89]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.citrix.com", Issuer "Verizon Public SureServer CA G14-SHA2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D6A92194F for ; Tue, 17 May 2016 10:46:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from prvs=938cbf5a0=roger.pau@citrix.com) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.26,324,1459814400"; d="scan'208";a="354723338" Date: Tue, 17 May 2016 12:46:34 +0200 From: Roger Pau Monn? To: Konstantin Belousov CC: "freebsd-xen@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: xn ethernet issues as DOMU under NetBSD DOM0 FIXED! Message-ID: <20160517104634.lw6tevipljjqo4bk@mac> References: <20160512162247.64x5hyud5i2jfgqy@mac> <20160517094301.h4oa4nyyakbj7r3h@mac> <20160517101700.GB89104@kib.kiev.ua> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160517101700.GB89104@kib.kiev.ua> User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.0-neo (2016-04-07) X-DLP: MIA2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 May 2016 10:46:38 -0000 On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 01:17:00PM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 11:43:01AM +0200, Roger Pau Monn? wrote: > > With previous FreeBSD 9.X versions, in order to get Xen support you had to > > compile a specific kernel (XENHVM), we wanted to remove this for FreeBSD 10, > > so we included the Xen components into the GENERIC kernel and made sure > > there were no weird interactions on bare metal. However, this change was > > too big to merge into 9, so in order to try to improve the situation on 9 > > Colin decided to pack all the Xen support into a kernel module, in order to > > remove the need to compile a specific kernel for Xen VMs. > > Why the module is a bad idea on HEAD/10.x ? Because there are pieces of Xen support that AFAICT cannot be placed inside of a module. For example the Xen apic_enumerator cannot be placed inside of a modules because it's needed too early in the boot process. The same happens with the Xen specific entry point that's used by Dom0 and PVH mode, it cannot be moved into a module. There are other parts/drivers that can certainly be moved into a kernel module, I just don't have enough time ATM to look into this. > To explain further, I do not object against Xen code included into GENERIC. > I am interested in the possibility of the stripped down kernel (without > XEN options) which can be made operable on HVM with the module preloaded. +1. Roger. From owner-freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Thu May 19 21:17:56 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAECFB41846 for ; Thu, 19 May 2016 21:17:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from resortia@server.resortiacommunities.com) Received: from server.resortiacommunities.com (server.resortiacommunities.com [198.1.78.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D3A8C1EAA for ; Thu, 19 May 2016 21:17:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from resortia@server.resortiacommunities.com) Received: from resortia by server.resortiacommunities.com with local (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1b3UWh-00025i-CV for freebsd-xen@freebsd.org; Thu, 19 May 2016 20:26:35 +0000 To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Subject: Unable to deliver your item, #00000246317 X-PHP-Script: steamboat.net/post.php for 96.231.106.9 Date: Thu, 19 May 2016 14:26:35 -0600 From: "FedEx International Next Flight" Reply-To: "FedEx International Next Flight" Message-ID: <3d7738237b6bed349f40cc2e022bbcbf@steamboat.net> X-Priority: 3 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server.resortiacommunities.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [500 500] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - server.resortiacommunities.com X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: server.resortiacommunities.com: authenticated_id: resortia/from_h X-Authenticated-Sender: server.resortiacommunities.com: gordon.hartman@steamboat.net X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 May 2016 21:17:56 -0000 Dear Customer, Your parcel has arrived at May 17. Courier was unable to deliver the parcel to you. Delivery Label is attached to this email. Kind regards, Gordon Hartman, Delivery Agent. From owner-freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Fri May 20 07:44:32 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68987B43429 for ; Fri, 20 May 2016 07:44:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 51A5C12CD for ; Fri, 20 May 2016 07:44:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u4K7iVCR053133 for ; Fri, 20 May 2016 07:44:32 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 182884] [xen] FreeBSD HVMPV domU networking does not work Date: Fri, 20 May 2016 07:44:31 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: unspecified X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: linimon@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: assigned_to short_desc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 May 2016 07:44:32 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D182884 Mark Linimon changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|emulation@FreeBSD.org |freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.org Summary|[hyper-v] FreeBSD HVMPV |[xen] FreeBSD HVMPV domU |domU networking does not |networking does not work |work | --- Comment #3 from Mark Linimon --- Correct Summary and assignment. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Fri May 20 09:04:45 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 897EDB42053 for ; Fri, 20 May 2016 09:04:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A1761954 for ; Fri, 20 May 2016 09:04:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u4K94jHk001253 for ; Fri, 20 May 2016 09:04:45 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 182884] [xen] FreeBSD HVMPV domU networking does not work Date: Fri, 20 May 2016 09:04:45 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: unspecified X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: royger@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Resolution: DUPLICATE X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc bug_status resolution Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 May 2016 09:04:45 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D182884 Roger Pau Monn=C3=83=C2=A9 changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |royger@freebsd.org Status|In Progress |Closed Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE --- Comment #4 from Roger Pau Monn=C3=83=C2=A9 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 188369 *** --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Fri May 20 09:04:46 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CDEFB42057 for ; Fri, 20 May 2016 09:04:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F16B11956 for ; Fri, 20 May 2016 09:04:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u4K94jHo001253 for ; Fri, 20 May 2016 09:04:45 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 188369] [xen] [panic] FreeBSD 10 XENHVM panic under NetBSD Dom0 (xn_txeof: WARNING: response is -1) Date: Fri, 20 May 2016 09:04:45 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: unspecified X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: royger@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 May 2016 09:04:46 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D188369 Roger Pau Monn=C3=83=C2=A9 changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |hugo@barafranca.com --- Comment #14 from Roger Pau Monn=C3=83=C2=A9 --- *** Bug 182884 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=