From owner-freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Mon Sep 26 02:11:47 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE084BEAAB1 for ; Mon, 26 Sep 2016 02:11:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julian@freebsd.org) Received: from vps1.elischer.org (vps1.elischer.org [204.109.63.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "vps1.elischer.org", Issuer "CA Cert Signing Authority" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8955C85E for ; Mon, 26 Sep 2016 02:11:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julian@freebsd.org) Received: from julian-mbp3.pixel8networks.com (50-196-156-133-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [50.196.156.133]) (authenticated bits=0) by vps1.elischer.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id u8Q2BgeG002280 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Sun, 25 Sep 2016 19:11:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from julian@freebsd.org) Subject: Re: number of xen block devices To: Colin Percival , Michael Sierchio References: <73fad119-03d8-a9ea-c222-f65b22c6feac@freebsd.org> <010001574a0207f9-d12e326c-e152-49f9-9763-2cf0161f7458-000000@email.amazonses.com> <3132e8d0-68db-940f-5cb1-22fe01b52480@freebsd.org> <010001574dffc771-92e1b19d-4165-4e64-ae2a-63456c87d7a6-000000@email.amazonses.com> Cc: FreeBSD Lists From: Julian Elischer Message-ID: <4ef07a55-76f8-a55e-aa93-2a2fdee62696@freebsd.org> Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2016 19:11:36 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <010001574dffc771-92e1b19d-4165-4e64-ae2a-63456c87d7a6-000000@email.amazonses.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2016 02:11:47 -0000 On 21/09/2016 11:26 AM, Colin Percival wrote: > On 09/21/16 09:13, Michael Sierchio wrote: >> Also check if there is a resource limit imposed by AWS. If you are bumping >> into that, a simple request can get the limit raised for a particular >> availability zone. > AWS limits can be an issue, but it would be a limit on the number or size of > the EBS volumes can *create*. Once volumes are created, AWS limits won't > affect whether you can attach them to instances or whether the instances can > see the attached volumes, so I doubt that's what Julian was running into. > yes, Colin has it right.. our virtual device is based on 8.0 plus patches from later, and can't see all the devices we create. I am moving to 10.3 this week so the problem may be self fixing.