From owner-freebsd-atm@freebsd.org Thu Apr 6 23:57:55 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-atm@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42767D32725; Thu, 6 Apr 2017 23:57:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brooks@spindle.one-eyed-alien.net) Received: from spindle.one-eyed-alien.net (spindle.one-eyed-alien.net [199.48.129.229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 240C4653; Thu, 6 Apr 2017 23:57:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brooks@spindle.one-eyed-alien.net) Received: by spindle.one-eyed-alien.net (Postfix, from userid 3001) id 8C1845A9F14; Thu, 6 Apr 2017 23:57:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2017 23:57:47 +0000 From: Brooks Davis To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-atm@freebsd.org Subject: Impending NATM removal Message-ID: <20170406235747.GA8756@spindle.one-eyed-alien.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="HcAYCG3uE/tztfnV" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.2 (2016-11-26) X-BeenThere: freebsd-atm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: ATM for FreeBSD! List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2017 23:57:55 -0000 --HcAYCG3uE/tztfnV Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline As previously threatened, I plan to remove NATM support next week. This includes the drivers en(4), fatm(4), hatm(4), and patm(4). None of these devices have been manufactured in the last 20 years so it is time to move on. The planned commit can be seen at https://reviews.freebsd.org/D9883 -- Brooks --HcAYCG3uE/tztfnV Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJY5tX6AAoJEKzQXbSebgfA9UoH/2jKQgdw6IoR7M7N8i7z70FX PSk5WWqilBTy0szmGJxMGcV1h3euRxGvCHCtxhzunifOh2Ad1CQgHJCuK/4wer88 NQeNcWh6MfhyO2zKocbT/TRdK1e5qDFcMTh+CGC8DKvVYqpvHDpz1T33bp5slXhG T8AaQrls5+iKHnmiszyQt9DqB62c9mMxKBAssD0auZZ9XdM1ZHa6F796dt89xgI2 oQGksru0M1kKK3rQxoWrhRHAsmTjoMldx9+4+Pmv1/psy80kXclu5elS+RafoQz3 Gqacuk4G/iEtOSGtWKA6Nlt7GUFX+hUjm8rMCb+EmAjC5A0QrU+tiH05jdR7gUM= =SaZ7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --HcAYCG3uE/tztfnV-- From owner-freebsd-atm@freebsd.org Fri Apr 7 09:32:14 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-atm@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E796CD31137; Fri, 7 Apr 2017 09:32:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rb@gid.co.uk) Received: from mx0.gid.co.uk (mx0.gid.co.uk [194.32.164.250]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6FC70268; Fri, 7 Apr 2017 09:32:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rb@gid.co.uk) Received: from [194.32.164.15] ([194.32.164.15]) by mx0.gid.co.uk (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id v379Sx7W087411; Fri, 7 Apr 2017 10:29:00 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from rb@gid.co.uk) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\)) Subject: Re: Impending NATM removal From: Bob Bishop In-Reply-To: <20170406235747.GA8756@spindle.one-eyed-alien.net> Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2017 10:28:59 +0100 Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-atm@freebsd.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <20170406235747.GA8756@spindle.one-eyed-alien.net> To: Brooks Davis X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124) X-BeenThere: freebsd-atm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: ATM for FreeBSD! List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2017 09:32:15 -0000 Hi, > On 7 Apr 2017, at 00:57, Brooks Davis wrote: >=20 > As previously threatened, I plan to remove NATM support next week. = This > includes the drivers en(4), fatm(4), hatm(4), and patm(4). None of > these devices have been manufactured in the last 20 years so it is = time > to move on. I don=E2=80=99t have a dog in this fight, but for instance ProSum = PROATM-E155 (patm(4)) still appear to be available. See = http://www.prosum.net/en/products/atm-adapters > The planned commit can be seen at https://reviews.freebsd.org/D9883 >=20 > -- Brooks -- Bob Bishop rb@gid.co.uk