From owner-freebsd-dtrace@freebsd.org Sun Jan 1 15:51:30 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-dtrace@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 098C8C97897 for ; Sun, 1 Jan 2017 15:51:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED08010B3 for ; Sun, 1 Jan 2017 15:51:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v01FpTiA036098 for ; Sun, 1 Jan 2017 15:51:29 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-dtrace@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 214556] www/firefox: fails to build on aarch64 with DTRACE=on Date: Sun, 01 Jan 2017 15:51:30 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-patch X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: commit-hook@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-dtrace@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-dtrace@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "A discussion list for developers working on DTrace in FreeBSD." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Jan 2017 15:51:30 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D214556 --- Comment #2 from commit-hook@freebsd.org --- A commit references this bug: Author: jbeich Date: Sun Jan 1 15:50:57 UTC 2017 New revision: 430259 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/430259 Log: gecko: temporarily hide DTRACE option on aarch64 PR: 214556 Changes: head/mail/thunderbird/Makefile head/www/firefox/Makefile head/www/firefox/Makefile.options head/www/firefox-esr/Makefile head/www/libxul/Makefile head/www/seamonkey/Makefile --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-dtrace@freebsd.org Sun Jan 1 20:39:04 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-dtrace@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93C86C9AFC8 for ; Sun, 1 Jan 2017 20:39:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 834C01CF1 for ; Sun, 1 Jan 2017 20:39:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v01Kd4im086433 for ; Sun, 1 Jan 2017 20:39:04 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-dtrace@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 214556] www/firefox: fails to build on aarch64 with DTRACE=on Date: Sun, 01 Jan 2017 20:39:04 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-patch X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: markj@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-dtrace@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-dtrace@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "A discussion list for developers working on DTrace in FreeBSD." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Jan 2017 20:39:04 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D214556 Mark Johnston changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |markj@FreeBSD.org --- Comment #3 from Mark Johnston --- Indeed, some of the required code in dt_link.c is not implemented for aarch= 64. Some other bits may be missing as well. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-dtrace@freebsd.org Mon Jan 2 21:54:31 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-dtrace@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C14CC9C466 for ; Mon, 2 Jan 2017 21:54:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from markjdb@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qk0-x22c.google.com (mail-qk0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF3901E03 for ; Mon, 2 Jan 2017 21:54:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from markjdb@gmail.com) Received: by mail-qk0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id t184so360221084qkd.0 for ; Mon, 02 Jan 2017 13:54:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=8aEjlqO7opmsR/Saxk8A+8zWIzlt9BlXxBAL1+MQOiU=; b=mIrMxK6jvyibv+TyUGsO4TqFlZnvxR/xK7TKeUqftmEGtz2sU7VZcQ9aZ/McWnU16i Tmq9IubUiPneibFG9Z3RyOxbsqecJM/36i+w6NEHUqhBkUnoF/dGsUCs4/nuJhI3DIzh 7B+0FYK9nrQCzr8I5HIBl1oA884U2WRxpQ5kTZvqNAUsKQVpUIb5rXcPAolDZcfcq0PN 4AqKs/JWSLW28BdJw+y9us+n2W7MPz6V4g39b4DO4wx3nV31DJxX78oWvfXCiB6XrlK8 l0OTqCwRWh927id6ak2a3nALbJxXAYkfJI1tql4fMWRcJW3jmBEx92cZGgi14KiJh6M4 xwpg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=8aEjlqO7opmsR/Saxk8A+8zWIzlt9BlXxBAL1+MQOiU=; b=rv4+M3iakx0rMdGbzopfmoB6EzR0qvLqV+lGawwnMl/bmQlQ18osXc3+NGy2GH17NB 7FmONuF/wAcw1s8JlK1g6ZhT4fBmRuozZEctmpajONLfF9HHDCPF/UJ6haJjb+jy3KoR fLyBrwCIGvIhVnP8YANuScl0ZalcjJDRiIAwmr9WmJ1QXpl6nFtot/cWt194uowgJf7i kQiDsCUt2Ih6Hzoi/7UN5u5eEebUhFQa5VHBsUbWvp18/QmLkN2qZuD6wJHCZxnnTgpT yrJfZQ/OcjN2YVeZo2ORdZeSBUTh1zHU2wsNSORbW+aIisvD8vceBu12ELMSKaYyrYtN 0p2A== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXIgY69RWTYc4+63Y7ycLCaM+GfS1zofOpyMeSYzMZhQtNWsBHT0bfa1Eif7ZfFYIQ== X-Received: by 10.55.190.66 with SMTP id o63mr58283826qkf.254.1483394069965; Mon, 02 Jan 2017 13:54:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from wkstn-mjohnston.west.isilon.com (c-76-104-201-218.hsd1.wa.comcast.net. [76.104.201.218]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p19sm42300231qtp.4.2017.01.02.13.54.28 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 02 Jan 2017 13:54:29 -0800 (PST) Sender: Mark Johnston Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2017 14:00:29 -0800 From: Mark Johnston To: Domagoj Stolfa Cc: freebsd-dtrace@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RFC: Changes in DTrace to allow for distributed operation Message-ID: <20170102220029.GC46812@wkstn-mjohnston.west.isilon.com> References: <20161230173747.GB46006@freebsd-laptop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20161230173747.GB46006@freebsd-laptop> User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.2 (2016-11-26) X-BeenThere: freebsd-dtrace@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "A discussion list for developers working on DTrace in FreeBSD." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Jan 2017 21:54:31 -0000 On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 06:37:47PM +0100, Domagoj Stolfa wrote: > Hello, > > I have been working on extending DTrace to allow for a natural way of tracing in > a distributed environment. This would consist of being able to trace events on > different virtual machines, remote servers with access, cluster nodes and so on. > I will summarize the changes I have made and have thought of making, outly all > the design tradeoffs, flaws and merits of each design tradeoff I have thought of > making in hopes of getting feedback from others interested in distributed > tracing. I think some concrete examples of what you'd like to be able to accomplish with this would help a lot. Is the goal here to be able to trace multiple independent systems at once and somehow aggregate their trace records? That's what "distributed tracing" suggests to me, but from reading your email it seems as though you're primarily interested in some form of remote tracing whereby one could execute something like # dtrace -n 'fbt$guest::kern_ioctl:entry' on a hypervisor and get records (in real time?) from a guest. Assuming I'm not completely off-base, this is a cool idea, but I think your objective needs to be more clearly defined before it's possible to evaluate the merits of different designs, especially when you're proposing adding new concepts to the core DTrace code. From owner-freebsd-dtrace@freebsd.org Tue Jan 3 18:01:47 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-dtrace@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE647C9DEF5 for ; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 18:01:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from domagoj.stolfa@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wj0-x241.google.com (mail-wj0-x241.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c01::241]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 815B11669; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 18:01:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from domagoj.stolfa@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wj0-x241.google.com with SMTP id qs7so35137505wjc.1; Tue, 03 Jan 2017 10:01:47 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=BhT1r7Ly4rB1FAZND+JeeKO8KaAoO94+BTiQbZS5ghA=; b=BxtfQQ6lezjXeqpu5sO0oiNV7BjLerSKO4/b/R5lJYUhJUILctE1qlHuxtAFhd9AS/ qpmJ1lra1D+SYMJ+vIV6yD2oinmJI3QljTILplujTx5vi5C/+CBQ4DQhn6v+i3CAb/UV bDz7rhlx9kEPF/Rcv2GlXa07tpzWQzwTYJPHlVl0VvWnjnpgiytFZdOYRtb98AWCAdBF WhpNKMrGMeWrtfglF7H66DoV+BiE4hEmnsd8rw8U9O5NiODqWaAFjfgDzH3E6Gp5LTG6 qC9JswJeKRUytRj39QHjP/cgcCk+wo+qKFaPNhLIUS4HyROMU0g0RknBAG9vPGornGYE 7feg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=BhT1r7Ly4rB1FAZND+JeeKO8KaAoO94+BTiQbZS5ghA=; b=VQIjJoR/M9wEwvdfzH+E3pHl3+UyUNoWM9Mkf3EvvnankE6IZX5yanC+YpSFKYM7LU DjLaiwQbAnbcFLHYww8/1I5KTAI+CL5V6a8HeUfkJA1b9umdg8dSmJXyVaVNOZutfnJr UZ/awYXuXliucxHbNuxLjJeMcnXvOx+NUAoacW6SgbQXHS7lFDkAh0kpCcKyNYVmt7rZ 1Rsnjkzherh8KrGiyGDNKKmsKnA3+/pTl3Q09Yye3Ya/vDs2UDu0RoiN6Hs9EwON00vK z4jjU6mEpvc0zs8EpuObIxZxeWxhWpOZ8dhUNvUH58NuaFes7e0IJK4Qou4C/OP2xweo k9/Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXL3l8ThwG1WCIAAl5/sNOVtdH0Kw/6SG9bkqBZh+I7pWIsZShvoeVLW97NNlF3YAQ== X-Received: by 10.194.136.166 with SMTP id qb6mr52351770wjb.42.1483466505248; Tue, 03 Jan 2017 10:01:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from freebsd (dh207-7-42.xnet.hr. [88.207.7.42]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id xu5sm94020775wjc.49.2017.01.03.10.01.43 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 03 Jan 2017 10:01:43 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2017 19:01:36 +0100 From: Domagoj Stolfa To: Mark Johnston Cc: freebsd-dtrace@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RFC: Changes in DTrace to allow for distributed operation Message-ID: <20170103180136.GA5635@freebsd> References: <20161230173747.GB46006@freebsd-laptop> <20170102220029.GC46812@wkstn-mjohnston.west.isilon.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="nFreZHaLTZJo0R7j" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170102220029.GC46812@wkstn-mjohnston.west.isilon.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.2 (2016-11-26) X-BeenThere: freebsd-dtrace@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "A discussion list for developers working on DTrace in FreeBSD." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2017 18:01:48 -0000 --nFreZHaLTZJo0R7j Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello, > I think some concrete examples of what you'd like to be able to > accomplish with this would help a lot. Is the goal here to be able to > trace multiple independent systems at once and somehow aggregate their > trace records? That's what "distributed tracing" suggests to me, but > from reading your email it seems as though you're primarily interested > in some form of remote tracing whereby one could execute something like >=20 > # dtrace -n 'fbt$guest::kern_ioctl:entry' The ultimate goal is indeed to have multiple DTrace instances cooperate and trace multiple independent systems at once. With the proposed implementatio= n, remote tracing would implicitly be implemented, as one could easily attach = to a remote machine that one has access to and trace it. The reasoning behind doing this in DTrace itself, as opposed to a daemon, is that global state could easily be kept in the scripts then. We could have a= ll types of variables that we do now and use them. In addition to that, instance-local variables could be added and allow for a concise way to repr= esent instance-wise aggregation. One could create scripts that allow for certain probes to be fired only if a certain condition is satisfied that happened on another instance. This coul= d aid in debugging interaction between certain software, such as a web server and= a database on two different machines among other things, while giving one full disclosure of the events taking place in both instances. The scripts would be written in the following way: # dtrace -n 'instance:provider:module:function:name' for a number of reasons: (1) It allows for tracing of multiple providers in an arbitrary number of different OS instances (2) With these semantics, even userland probes can be traced, for example, = once could write: # dtrace -n 'vm-[a-zA-Z0-9]:pid$target:libc:memcpy:entry' resulting in each of the userland probes in each of the instances(not necessarily virtual machines) that match glob being installed and reporting= back to the host. > on a hypervisor and get records (in real time?) from a guest. Assuming > I'm not completely off-base, this is a cool idea, but I think your > objective needs to be more clearly defined before it's possible to > evaluate the merits of different designs, especially when you're > proposing adding new concepts to the core DTrace code. In the case of a hypervisor, this approach allows for real time reporting of events using the hypercall ABI that I've implemented for that purpose[1]. T= his would also allow for destructive actions to be implemented in the case of virtual machines. This would prove to be more problematic for remote machin= es, as we don't want to wait for host's response(which could take a very long t= ime over the network) in order to do something. In such a case, the host could during initialization ask the guest DTrace to perform a certain action once a probe fires. This of course requires one to trust that DTrace instance to do the right thing. Some of these changes already exist and are being implemented in my GitHub repository[2]. I'm currently working on a PoC that allows for some of the simpler things to operate, which would allow for benchmarks and stress test= ing of the core concept. I hope that's cleared up some of the vagueness regarding the problem I am t= rying to solve. [1] https://reviews.freebsd.org/D8100 [2] https://github.com/dstolfa/freebsd/tree/dtrace-vm --=20 Best regards, Domagoj Stolfa --nFreZHaLTZJo0R7j Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEHQB+y96lmmv+IXofwxT+ikb0YU4FAlhr5v4ACgkQwxT+ikb0 YU4Wkgf/ZNu04+8CMebwWuL9vsOuFGMmGeT05YEUc5q3xAVc3SCpQO3UWlgGTILo djtjHttnRw5JMtmQyFlFT6we862iIWmZ/Ej+l1pmhbqgK2sHHdaD25d0PK4JlrH+ Ceb1IxQh0NXDgm40BdNq+wVF2YwIIa4WFnQ3ABNJjMmmGMrpcJVNJJyT9MYJPQ1X YGnm6ZcUzAHi3VNiexM6X1puG7lHYRVr0KHmjAFoaxUxuuqIYVxZWd4BMNht6h1u s9WXuXGmUjfYtMd07Mbs3GTFQ4RFNOT8Lz1DRcwQogkeqRUtQT3DEd8jE/qFdQQ2 MuUzv3+WuGxREMc2+47hGeNa7jVqiA== =M0re -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nFreZHaLTZJo0R7j-- From owner-freebsd-dtrace@freebsd.org Thu Jan 5 16:32:10 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-dtrace@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 933DCCA0C98 for ; Thu, 5 Jan 2017 16:32:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnn@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82F7A19AF for ; Thu, 5 Jan 2017 16:32:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnn@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 824CDCA0C97; Thu, 5 Jan 2017 16:32:10 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: dtrace@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81FA3CA0C96 for ; Thu, 5 Jan 2017 16:32:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnn@freebsd.org) Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (relay4-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.183.196]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 54BAF19A8 for ; Thu, 5 Jan 2017 16:32:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnn@freebsd.org) Received: from [172.20.10.2] (unknown [IPv6:2607:fb90:1808:92b7:e993:9c10:8738:a431]) (Authenticated sender: gnn@neville-neil.com) by relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 44D1F1720F5 for ; Thu, 5 Jan 2017 17:31:58 +0100 (CET) From: "George Neville-Neil" To: dtrace@FreeBSD.org Subject: Unable to make the hangout today Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2017 11:31:56 -0500 Message-ID: <356EE1A8-CF43-4CBA-AF6D-9F299BA779AA@freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; markup=markdown X-Mailer: MailMate (1.9.6r5319) X-BeenThere: freebsd-dtrace@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "A discussion list for developers working on DTrace in FreeBSD." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2017 16:32:10 -0000 If other folks attend, please update the notes here: https://wiki.freebsd.org/DTrace Best, George