From owner-freebsd-mips@freebsd.org Tue Feb 21 19:56:25 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-mips@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38824CE89CD for ; Tue, 21 Feb 2017 19:56:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wlosh@bsdimp.com) Received: from mail-io0-x230.google.com (mail-io0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0CC71116B for ; Tue, 21 Feb 2017 19:56:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wlosh@bsdimp.com) Received: by mail-io0-x230.google.com with SMTP id g18so30231269ioe.0 for ; Tue, 21 Feb 2017 11:56:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bsdimp-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to; bh=JBTWAD69dqfaxowzWp4Iz5W9tiQVUPU/3Si0XG4DXhU=; b=sugJa2cW20FPiQPQesIJJ9JBKMGEm/D+FkL+OEdhGBADjRSdk2zPQx7QYa26nISiqH XJS7umW/VWtKYdzNsZfE3x19j8Ab0yOXA4/MoR6Y+WF/pu3nylBql8o9QfM0l3cb8RbA XT6HOOu2gjfkLet422XsrxTF05VUyHJj1K/Gy7lFmik8XVd/CLeIF5B1GeJT9W5vdNXm s3k/jphgzJhNROXWgujDUsmH6mAg7vpX7KczgkCxC+sEM4vsj0ZTHV/XEvqhdvmusQVo 6dBMLv7eEow4EiZMyvFj0z60BhlpajLJgpV5rAs8WY9T3yFBuL5tqmMT4zQj6cLVvvsO eM5w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to; bh=JBTWAD69dqfaxowzWp4Iz5W9tiQVUPU/3Si0XG4DXhU=; b=rsJI0GYg5ossk0Tb6WvXoTkq+z2kvoyjLmLv1GsWtRTE15TK3E8Un3n9ZQZI5zL4Dg Q+WuD01CKJ2XmuKoogPgogTN/+TeXWIsqHPxyT5zfmNnVSlgYGP3U9bedDSF6/I0b0zY JJdX+8HxWkibYiH7ahsXtAl73jDrC6jqsW4++eO4lzAyuXydHZY+lK80ubE5Rs6z/gMk JljZwzNZckMa6OSvKcK6Qa/BwC4FpyfSLSP/7yKwTMyZ5gkDGeA9qtJwxkYFXatr3jI0 Tb4NvF3dyY1Q/arWa2heNKkytPawXcBV/O5ZnMW6BO6KQAdJfL7yGF5Kahu21secP1bu VbWA== X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39lFqPygA5KOWlun0byfGLm5dz4ChZ9y8SlCImRmxoP5Mrc9FAdP46mhytdJx6DRudWvfeyf6+k0oFrX5Q== X-Received: by 10.107.11.216 with SMTP id 85mr20093315iol.0.1487706983857; Tue, 21 Feb 2017 11:56:23 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: wlosh@bsdimp.com Received: by 10.79.145.132 with HTTP; Tue, 21 Feb 2017 11:56:23 -0800 (PST) X-Originating-IP: [69.53.245.200] In-Reply-To: <20170221194748.GA16066@britannica.bec.de> References: <20170221194748.GA16066@britannica.bec.de> From: Warner Losh Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 12:56:23 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: ukXoLCpzScge4VrJZWAOeVAFOqY Message-ID: Subject: Fwd: Retiring __ABICALLS__ To: "freebsd-mips@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-mips@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to MIPS List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 19:56:25 -0000 While this is for NetBSD, I think we should do something similar, if such work isn't already in progress. Warner ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Joerg Sonnenberger Date: Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 12:47 PM Subject: Retiring __ABICALLS__ To: port-mips@netbsd.org Hello all, GCC has moved to defining __mips_abicalls when -mabicalls is used a long time ago for the generic MIPS code. Since we have our own copy of that code to reduce namespace pollution, we never got that switch. I don't see a good reason for keeping our macro, so I'd like to just switch the in-tree GCC and the handful of users in the tree to the new name. Comments? Objections? Joerg