From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sun Aug 13 11:47:50 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47652DDB510 for ; Sun, 13 Aug 2017 11:47:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list1@gjunka.com) Received: from msa1.earth.yoonka.com (yoonka.com [88.98.225.149]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "msa1.earth.yoonka.com", Issuer "msa1.earth.yoonka.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CD0856B224 for ; Sun, 13 Aug 2017 11:47:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list1@gjunka.com) Received: from crayon2.yoonka.com (crayon2.yoonka.com [10.70.7.20]) (authenticated bits=0) by msa1.earth.yoonka.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id v7DBle7P036149 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 13 Aug 2017 11:47:40 GMT (envelope-from list1@gjunka.com) To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org From: Grzegorz Junka Subject: WiFi and NFS Message-ID: <4cb224a1-7fb2-2b12-dd93-e6eab97a825b@gjunka.com> Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2017 11:47:40 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-GB-large X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2017 11:47:50 -0000 On my laptop I have two interfaces, wlan0 (WiFi) and ue0 (LAN). Obviously LAN is faster but not always connected. Is there any way to tell the system to use LAN interface in preference to the other? When mounting NFS it uses the WiFi interface rather than LAN. Maybe there is an option to tell NFS to bind to a specific interface (if available)? GrzegorzJ From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sun Aug 13 12:42:36 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6E07DDF0A9 for ; Sun, 13 Aug 2017 12:42:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from smtp209.alice.it (smtp209.alice.it [82.57.200.105]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D0596CE47 for ; Sun, 13 Aug 2017 12:42:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from soth.ventu (79.13.168.184) by smtp209.alice.it (8.6.060.28) (authenticated as acanedi@alice.it) id 597E40A20607A922; Sun, 13 Aug 2017 14:42:22 +0200 Received: from alamar.ventu (alamar.local.netfence.it [10.1.2.18]) by soth.ventu (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v7DCgJDk024623; Sun, 13 Aug 2017 14:42:20 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) X-Authentication-Warning: soth.ventu: Host alamar.local.netfence.it [10.1.2.18] claimed to be alamar.ventu Subject: Re: WiFi and NFS To: list1@gjunka.com References: <4cb224a1-7fb2-2b12-dd93-e6eab97a825b@gjunka.com> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org From: Andrea Venturoli Message-ID: <00bdd8f1-7318-535e-5f11-671c2b2472c1@netfence.it> Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2017 14:42:14 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4cb224a1-7fb2-2b12-dd93-e6eab97a825b@gjunka.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2017 12:42:37 -0000 On 08/13/17 13:47, Grzegorz Junka wrote: > On my laptop I have two interfaces, wlan0 (WiFi) and ue0 (LAN). > Obviously LAN is faster but not always connected. Is there any way to > tell the system to use LAN interface in preference to the other? You mean: > https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/network-aggregation.html#networking-lagg-wired-and-wireless ? bye av. From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sun Aug 13 13:43:32 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B45CADE2790 for ; Sun, 13 Aug 2017 13:43:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list1@gjunka.com) Received: from msa1.earth.yoonka.com (yoonka.com [88.98.225.149]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "msa1.earth.yoonka.com", Issuer "msa1.earth.yoonka.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5671F6EF7C for ; Sun, 13 Aug 2017 13:43:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list1@gjunka.com) Received: from crayon2.yoonka.com (crayon2.yoonka.com [10.70.7.20]) (authenticated bits=0) by msa1.earth.yoonka.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id v7DDhTfi037539 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 13 Aug 2017 13:43:29 GMT (envelope-from list1@gjunka.com) Subject: Re: WiFi and NFS To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org References: <4cb224a1-7fb2-2b12-dd93-e6eab97a825b@gjunka.com> <00bdd8f1-7318-535e-5f11-671c2b2472c1@netfence.it> From: Grzegorz Junka Message-ID: Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2017 13:43:29 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <00bdd8f1-7318-535e-5f11-671c2b2472c1@netfence.it> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-GB-large X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2017 13:43:32 -0000 On 13/08/2017 12:42, Andrea Venturoli wrote: > On 08/13/17 13:47, Grzegorz Junka wrote: >> On my laptop I have two interfaces, wlan0 (WiFi) and ue0 (LAN). >> Obviously LAN is faster but not always connected. Is there any way to >> tell the system to use LAN interface in preference to the other? > > You mean: > >> https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/network-aggregation.html#networking-lagg-wired-and-wireless >> > > ? Thanks a lot! That looks exactly like what I need. However, when I was checking the lagg configuration a few years ago, at that time it wasn't possible to set up a lagg with WiFi. Has anything changed (fairly) recently? GrzegorzJ From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sun Aug 13 17:16:34 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41BB5DCBBF3 for ; Sun, 13 Aug 2017 17:16:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from smtp206.alice.it (smtp206.alice.it [82.57.200.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC5E476F3A for ; Sun, 13 Aug 2017 17:16:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from soth.ventu (79.13.168.184) by smtp206.alice.it (8.6.060.28) (authenticated as acanedi@alice.it) id 597E3F0A0AA31F4E; Sun, 13 Aug 2017 19:16:19 +0200 Received: from alamar.ventu (alamar.local.netfence.it [10.1.2.18]) by soth.ventu (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v7DHGIFd043175; Sun, 13 Aug 2017 19:16:18 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) X-Authentication-Warning: soth.ventu: Host alamar.local.netfence.it [10.1.2.18] claimed to be alamar.ventu Subject: Re: WiFi and NFS To: list1@gjunka.com References: <4cb224a1-7fb2-2b12-dd93-e6eab97a825b@gjunka.com> <00bdd8f1-7318-535e-5f11-671c2b2472c1@netfence.it> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org From: Andrea Venturoli Message-ID: <2e42ef4f-e55a-9388-3d57-f7b80b396e15@netfence.it> Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2017 19:16:13 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2017 17:16:34 -0000 On 08/13/17 15:43, Grzegorz Junka wrote: > Thanks a lot! That looks exactly like what I need. However, when I was > checking the lagg configuration a few years ago, at that time it wasn't > possible to set up a lagg with WiFi. Has anything changed (fairly) > recently? Don't know about history, but I've been using that example possibly for a couple of years at least. bye av. From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Mon Aug 14 16:26:47 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEE19DD5247 for ; Mon, 14 Aug 2017 16:26:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD81E6436C for ; Mon, 14 Aug 2017 16:26:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v7EGQlAL004034 for ; Mon, 14 Aug 2017 16:26:47 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 219703] System freeze when creating bridge over vlan over lagg over ixgbe Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2017 16:26:47 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: topical@gmx.net X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2017 16:26:47 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D219703 --- Comment #4 from topical --- I've upgraded to 11.1-RELEASE. Seems that the issue is gone, so this bug ca= n be closed as fixed. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Mon Aug 14 21:08:35 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F58CDE4B22 for ; Mon, 14 Aug 2017 21:08:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1DCD66EF6E for ; Mon, 14 Aug 2017 21:08:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v7EL8YCq022831 for ; Mon, 14 Aug 2017 21:08:34 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 173444] socket: IPV6_USE_MIN_MTU and TCP is broken Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2017 21:08:35 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 8.3-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-qa, patch X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: tuexen@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: mfc-stable10? mfc-stable11? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2017 21:08:35 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D173444 Michael Tuexen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tuexen@freebsd.org --- Comment #14 from Michael Tuexen --- I think the TCP mss should honor the IPV6_USE_MIN_MTU option, the same way = as SCTP should use the minmtu. We should also disable PMTU when the socket opt= ion is set. Will put a corresponding patch into phabricator... --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Aug 15 19:23:56 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BEE5DC3453 for ; Tue, 15 Aug 2017 19:23:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49CCB80729 for ; Tue, 15 Aug 2017 19:23:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v7FJNs8Z070896 for ; Tue, 15 Aug 2017 19:23:56 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 221497] Inconsistency in NETWORK group files rights for PPP Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2017 19:23:55 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: misc X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.1-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: linimon@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: assigned_to Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2017 19:23:56 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D221497 Mark Linimon changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org |freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Aug 15 19:24:25 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3F4DDC35EF for ; Tue, 15 Aug 2017 19:24:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 911688087A for ; Tue, 15 Aug 2017 19:24:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v7FJOP7H071698 for ; Tue, 15 Aug 2017 19:24:25 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 221492] Creating stf interface as "stf" causes kernel panic Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2017 19:24:25 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.1-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: linimon@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: assigned_to Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2017 19:24:25 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D221492 Mark Linimon changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org |freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Aug 15 19:29:45 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A75BEDC3F97 for ; Tue, 15 Aug 2017 19:29:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9293B80F9C for ; Tue, 15 Aug 2017 19:29:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v7FJTjJi080711 for ; Tue, 15 Aug 2017 19:29:45 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 221446] add net default: gateway [IPv6 gateway] fib 0: route already in table Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2017 19:29:45 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: bin X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.1-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: linimon@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: assigned_to Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2017 19:29:45 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D221446 Mark Linimon changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org |freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Aug 15 19:30:00 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40DE5DC404C for ; Tue, 15 Aug 2017 19:30:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2EB5D810DB for ; Tue, 15 Aug 2017 19:30:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v7FJTx77081150 for ; Tue, 15 Aug 2017 19:30:00 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 221445] The absence of the accept_rtadv option causes an error "ping6: sendmsg: No buffer space available" Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2017 19:30:00 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: bin X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.1-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: linimon@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: assigned_to Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2017 19:30:00 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D221445 Mark Linimon changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org |freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Aug 15 19:30:54 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45BFEDC4348 for ; Tue, 15 Aug 2017 19:30:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 33DDB813D6 for ; Tue, 15 Aug 2017 19:30:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v7FJUr2k084910 for ; Tue, 15 Aug 2017 19:30:54 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 221418] FreeBSD 10.4-PRERELEASE fails to build on systems using 32 bit time_t since r322315. Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2017 19:30:53 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.3-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: patch X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: linimon@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: keywords assigned_to Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2017 19:30:54 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D221418 Mark Linimon changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |patch Assignee|freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org |freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Aug 15 19:34:38 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85EB2DC4B6E for ; Tue, 15 Aug 2017 19:34:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 745A9819BE for ; Tue, 15 Aug 2017 19:34:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v7FJYcUp099498 for ; Tue, 15 Aug 2017 19:34:38 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 221385] [Regression] v6 mapped v4 addresses not working in 11.1 Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2017 19:34:38 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.1-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: linimon@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: assigned_to Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2017 19:34:38 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D221385 Mark Linimon changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org |freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Aug 15 19:38:42 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AE9DDC531B for ; Tue, 15 Aug 2017 19:38:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 093FE81E13 for ; Tue, 15 Aug 2017 19:38:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v7FJcfaP006212 for ; Tue, 15 Aug 2017 19:38:41 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 221354] No connection with Atheros Killer 220x Ethernet Chipset Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2017 19:38:41 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: linimon@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: assigned_to Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2017 19:38:42 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D221354 Mark Linimon changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org |freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Aug 15 19:40:22 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D9D7DC5572 for ; Tue, 15 Aug 2017 19:40:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B86281F8F for ; Tue, 15 Aug 2017 19:40:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v7FJeLTP009072 for ; Tue, 15 Aug 2017 19:40:22 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 221317] Netmap issue after ixgbe driver update in r320897 Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2017 19:40:22 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.1-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: IntelNetworking, regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: linimon@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: erj@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc keywords assigned_to short_desc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2017 19:40:22 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D221317 Mark Linimon changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|erj@freebsd.org | Keywords| |regression Assignee|freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org |erj@freebsd.org Summary|Netmap issue after ixgbe |Netmap issue after ixgbe |driver update |driver update in r320897 --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Aug 15 19:41:05 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5732CDC5701 for ; Tue, 15 Aug 2017 19:41:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 451BA8213B for ; Tue, 15 Aug 2017 19:41:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v7FJf4uQ012365 for ; Tue, 15 Aug 2017 19:41:05 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 221530] if_ixl: add a way to disable/enable lldp handling by the NIC Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2017 19:41:04 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: IntelNetworking, patch X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: linimon@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: keywords assigned_to Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2017 19:41:05 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D221530 Mark Linimon changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |IntelNetworking, patch Assignee|freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org |freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Aug 15 19:41:50 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5201BDC5A80 for ; Tue, 15 Aug 2017 19:41:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4037D82310 for ; Tue, 15 Aug 2017 19:41:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v7FJfnhR018218 for ; Tue, 15 Aug 2017 19:41:50 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 221439] ix ethernet doesn't link to switch if vlans are enabled. Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2017 19:41:50 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.1-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: IntelNetworking X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: linimon@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: assigned_to keywords cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2017 19:41:50 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D221439 Mark Linimon changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org |freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Keywords| |IntelNetworking CC| |sbruno@FreeBSD.org --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Aug 15 21:37:58 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BCA0DCD6AD for ; Tue, 15 Aug 2017 21:37:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 59CDD1940 for ; Tue, 15 Aug 2017 21:37:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v7FLbwhK090933 for ; Tue, 15 Aug 2017 21:37:58 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 221492] Creating stf interface as "stf" causes kernel panic Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2017 21:37:58 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.1-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: ultima@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Resolution: DUPLICATE X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: resolution bug_status Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2017 21:37:58 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D221492 Richard Gallamore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|New |Closed --- Comment #2 from Richard Gallamore --- That is the issue, thanks. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 218895 *** --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Aug 15 21:37:59 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53F26DCD6B1 for ; Tue, 15 Aug 2017 21:37:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 421531942 for ; Tue, 15 Aug 2017 21:37:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v7FLbwhO090933 for ; Tue, 15 Aug 2017 21:37:59 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 218895] ifconfig name with same group name will crash the system Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2017 21:37:58 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: ultima@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2017 21:37:59 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D218895 Richard Gallamore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ultima@freebsd.org --- Comment #3 from Richard Gallamore --- *** Bug 221492 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Aug 15 22:35:44 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9328CDD1103; Tue, 15 Aug 2017 22:35:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julien.charbon@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wr0-f176.google.com (mail-wr0-f176.google.com [209.85.128.176]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2BB6E38EF; Tue, 15 Aug 2017 22:35:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julien.charbon@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wr0-f176.google.com with SMTP id x43so7341396wrb.3; Tue, 15 Aug 2017 15:35:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:subject:to:references:cc:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=1BRdJioQHmQu/OSDTYnLutICDr9h7FDVnHJOLgreR1I=; b=mPcBk46XOvRvqU7gT/fNOxwrhOcDIwdIddl0l6EwQZrWTqk7grWj7hFom5iAQ+7txF e/czE/RakqzQHziJiiF773xE4p8Pdwr8GfUuZkTXNfdqFEFIppkduQ+VATqnkG1mUtlu C9028598Q8ExHNCuHUesu5yacbtJ8/ah8rXSU+0ZNXckeIlZ2CCJVVjyC9wp72RuyD9Z VP0JR1SYjumfkySrnRDi8zw8SvWt282Z8Lsy9SMf4EeIT8QD2GyqD5mZV+wk++AbZ+4R A1kEwie4O8lpHxConnlToYUpj8DtiSHx8/GD64HL6WggEH6GCFV9EsH1sIzU3hKlfVdi DKvQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AHYfb5hB16GjJ/vSzlhgDC//hMowTpMvcE+rHhBGMoWydZEh90pZwIiD 8YztN/xPmhzuRduzzVc= X-Received: by 10.223.151.65 with SMTP id r59mr20767615wrb.189.1502832821381; Tue, 15 Aug 2017 14:33:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.100.64.20] ([217.30.88.7]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l43sm11393378wrl.33.2017.08.15.14.33.39 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 15 Aug 2017 14:33:39 -0700 (PDT) From: Julien Charbon Subject: Re: mlx4en, timer irq @100%... (11.0 stuck on high network load ???) To: Ben RUBSON References: <9c306f10-7c05-d28d-e551-a930603aaafa@selasky.org> <896dd782-cb2c-0259-65d1-b00daae452de@FreeBSD.org> <0DB9F6FF-8BC9-48F5-B359-AC1905B9EB06@gmail.com> <7f14c95d-1ef8-bf82-c469-e6566c3aba66@selasky.org> <76A5EE7E-1D2E-46B4-86F1-F219C3DCE6EA@gmail.com> <4C91C6E5-0725-42E7-9813-1F3ACF3DDD6E@gmail.com> <5840c25e-7472-3276-6df9-1ed4183078ad@selasky.org> <2ADA8C57-2C2D-4F97-9F0B-82D53EDDC649@gmail.com> <061cdf72-6285-8239-5380-58d9d19a1ef7@selasky.org> <92BEE83D-498F-47D5-A53C-39DCDC00A0FD@gmail.com> <5d8960d8-e1ff-8719-320f-d3ae84054714@selasky.org> <6B4A35F7-5694-4945-9575-19ADB678F9FA@gmail.com> <297a784a-3d80-b1a6-652e-a78621fe5a8b@selasky.org> <3ECCFBF1-18D9-4E33-8F39-0C366C3BB8B4@gmail.com> <0a5787c5-8a53-ab09-971a-dc1cd5f3aca0@freebsd.org> Cc: Hans Petter Selasky , FreeBSD Net , hiren , Slawa Olhovchenkov , FreeBSD Stable Message-ID: <645f2ee3-3eaa-660e-2a64-37d53e88322f@freebsd.org> Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2017 23:33:36 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2017 22:35:44 -0000 Hi Ben, On 8/11/17 11:32 AM, Ben RUBSON wrote: >> On 08 Aug 2017, at 13:33, Julien Charbon wrote: >> >> On 8/8/17 10:31 AM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: >>> >>> Suggested fix attached. >> >> I agree we your conclusion. Just for the record, more precisely this >> regression seems to have been introduced with: >> (...) >> Thus good catch, and your patch looks good. I am going to just verify >> the other in_pcbrele_wlocked() calls in TCP stack. > > Julien, do you plan to make this fix reach 11.0-p12 ? I am checking if your issue is another flavor of the issue fixed by: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=307551 https://reviews.freebsd.org/D8211 This fix in not in 11.0 but in 11.1. Currently I did not found how an inp in INP_TIMEWAIT state can have been INP_FREED without having its tw set to NULL already except the issue fixed by r307551. Thus could you try to apply this patch: https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd/commit/acb5bfda99b753d9ead3529d04f20087c5f7d0a0.patch and see if you can still reproduce this issue? And in the spirit of r307551 fix and based on Hans patch I will also propose to add a kernel log describing the issue instead of starting an infinite loop when INVARIANT is not set. -- Julien From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Aug 16 09:02:13 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BF4DDCE872; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 09:02:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ben.rubson@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wm0-x241.google.com (mail-wm0-x241.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::241]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C855476A9E; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 09:02:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ben.rubson@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wm0-x241.google.com with SMTP id y206so4014178wmd.5; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 02:02:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=ucFkfzDR5UXtXK24WExu5AySLakUPR4msaDLF92jKDk=; b=pQpw3ynXErfFk2OMu6a33u7eM3XE5WZCMVpogIDeP9TqxYBbqOYmyDxoKxLRPpK04Q inc9HfovRvJasUslBlO0oXm7yVDml6229YbVh+ha6rBVUuqmuHthZbJ7/BCqSOebQig4 mEyalmAeLQ56U2r70GzfWSI7LrsBM3NDu2vx/nqCB4yE+SwruLZh+SnxFR5M9rhCd5wH WthQsf4oOwIqEPND2ea19nfvouJ/OKaWbqTU0yPLMOK3IUkybYMaVNJ/gfyxtDyMYFIX 2ik3TypwKBbjxQk2xFILo5dBkzP3UTTRlOgsDHXW8SIcqym2fM+UMf2kv+qqfCPMIrfL Y9pQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=ucFkfzDR5UXtXK24WExu5AySLakUPR4msaDLF92jKDk=; b=OJ3zKyB2NBOzc/iJI7HHi5H8m00A9zZBz+Btjs3VPRBMfWXeZiykLcLJR/z9iH+4oO 8N72dB+MW6iR8olSgxv/Z2CcTbKEX8Aj9IJDgRBNHWtgM4K88PzT2zrFsKvKHfud3/jy 2vZjU2Cn7eG+giqQUpQYz7LxtmmB4ZWhn7pjMQUdt/FNEL7BYjD77hdXzLHJIkGbdy0O BccJeNzeEpBgkBjGrge0JOdPJU0H6MiIAV6fYzqoGtR4kXuHboQ5N7+Wci1hS0oKq9eu IcVSbuFC3z95PHm7pveAZoSfyFjmO4iYJuyAxERdIsZPLqRhyfZHrvYjG1MwfhWdSrt9 WmiQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AHYfb5h+waTLb2ruhthMZCQDyLPOQiM01xBWBvbV6Eyt7MkxNdTqFmdM DfAedj3KdxSLfKXi7iR3Qw== X-Received: by 10.28.189.68 with SMTP id n65mr803067wmf.15.1502874129300; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 02:02:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ben.home (LFbn-1-6951-179.w90-116.abo.wanadoo.fr. [90.116.132.179]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c34sm425929wra.80.2017.08.16.02.02.07 (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 16 Aug 2017 02:02:08 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\)) Subject: Re: mlx4en, timer irq @100%... (11.0 stuck on high network load ???) From: Ben RUBSON In-Reply-To: <645f2ee3-3eaa-660e-2a64-37d53e88322f@freebsd.org> Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2017 11:02:06 +0200 Cc: Hans Petter Selasky , FreeBSD Net , hiren , Slawa Olhovchenkov , FreeBSD Stable Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <13DE4E6D-CE83-4B5D-BF88-0EFE65111311@gmail.com> References: <9c306f10-7c05-d28d-e551-a930603aaafa@selasky.org> <896dd782-cb2c-0259-65d1-b00daae452de@FreeBSD.org> <0DB9F6FF-8BC9-48F5-B359-AC1905B9EB06@gmail.com> <7f14c95d-1ef8-bf82-c469-e6566c3aba66@selasky.org> <76A5EE7E-1D2E-46B4-86F1-F219C3DCE6EA@gmail.com> <4C91C6E5-0725-42E7-9813-1F3ACF3DDD6E@gmail.com> <5840c25e-7472-3276-6df9-1ed4183078ad@selasky.org> <2ADA8C57-2C2D-4F97-9F0B-82D53EDDC649@gmail.com> <061cdf72-6285-8239-5380-58d9d19a1ef7@selasky.org> <92BEE83D-498F-47D5-A53C-39DCDC00A0FD@gmail.com> <5d8960d8-e1ff-8719-320f-d3ae84054714@selasky.org> <6B4A35F7-5694-4945-9575-19ADB678F9FA@gmail.com> <297a784a-3d80-b1a6-652e-a78621fe5a8b@selasky.org> <3ECCFBF1-18D9-4E33-8F39-0C366C3BB8B4@gmail.com> <0a5787c5-8a53-ab09-971a-dc1cd5f3aca0@freebsd.org> <645f2ee3-3eaa-660e-2a64-37d53e88322f@freebsd.org> To: Julien Charbon X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124) X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2017 09:02:13 -0000 > On 15 Aug 2017, at 23:33, Julien Charbon wrote: >=20 > On 8/11/17 11:32 AM, Ben RUBSON wrote: >>> On 08 Aug 2017, at 13:33, Julien Charbon wrote: >>>=20 >>> On 8/8/17 10:31 AM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: >>>>=20 >>>> Suggested fix attached. >>>=20 >>> I agree we your conclusion. Just for the record, more precisely = this >>> regression seems to have been introduced with: >>> (...) >>> Thus good catch, and your patch looks good. I am going to just = verify >>> the other in_pcbrele_wlocked() calls in TCP stack. >>=20 >> Julien, do you plan to make this fix reach 11.0-p12 ? >=20 > I am checking if your issue is another flavor of the issue fixed by: >=20 > https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=3Drevision&revision=3D307551 > https://reviews.freebsd.org/D8211 >=20 > This fix in not in 11.0 but in 11.1. Currently I did not found how an > inp in INP_TIMEWAIT state can have been INP_FREED without having its = tw > set to NULL already except the issue fixed by r307551. >=20 > Thus could you try to apply this patch: >=20 > = https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd/commit/acb5bfda99b753d9ead3529d04f20087= c5f7d0a0.patch >=20 > and see if you can still reproduce this issue? Thank you for your answer Julien. Unfortunately, I'm not sure at all how to reproduce the issue. I have other servers which are 100% identical to this one, same = workload, same some-months uptime, but they did not trigger the bug yet. If other network stack experts (I'm not) agree with your analysis, we could then certainly go further with D8211 / r307551. One thing that perhaps might help : # netstat -an | grep TIME_WAIT$ | wc -l 468 Note that due to this running bug, sendmail has lots of difficulties to = send outgoing mails. As soon as I run the above netstat command, I receive a lot of stacked = mails (more than 20 this time). As if netstat was able to somehow help... Number of TIME_WAIT connections however does not decrease, but = increases. > And in the spirit of r307551 fix and based on Hans patch I will also > propose to add a kernel log describing the issue instead of starting = an > infinite loop when INVARIANT is not set. Which should then never be triggered :) Good idea I think ! Thank you again ! Ben From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Aug 16 12:05:34 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 878E7DD7AC3 for ; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 12:05:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7580C804FE for ; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 12:05:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v7GC5YJ1062666 for ; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 12:05:34 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 221418] FreeBSD 10.4-PRERELEASE fails to build on systems using 32 bit time_t since r322315. Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2017 12:05:34 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.3-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: patch X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: tuexen@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2017 12:05:34 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D221418 --- Comment #2 from Michael Tuexen --- It should already be fixed by https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/322454 --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Aug 16 12:30:55 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8FE1DD9264 for ; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 12:30:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D704881400 for ; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 12:30:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v7GCUtYj086422 for ; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 12:30:55 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 221385] [Regression] v6 mapped v4 addresses not working in 11.1 Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2017 12:30:55 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.1-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: tuexen@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc bug_status Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2017 12:30:56 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D221385 Michael Tuexen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tuexen@freebsd.org Status|New |In Progress --- Comment #1 from Michael Tuexen --- I can confirm the problem on head (and therefore an 11.1). This is most likely related to https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/31= 8649 which was MFCed in https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/319411. Let me look into it... --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Aug 16 12:31:06 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A57A7DD9286 for ; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 12:31:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 934C28148F for ; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 12:31:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v7GCV6ov090616 for ; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 12:31:06 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 221385] [Regression] v6 mapped v4 addresses not working in 11.1 Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2017 12:31:06 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.1-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: tuexen@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: tuexen@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: assigned_to Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2017 12:31:06 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D221385 Michael Tuexen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org |tuexen@freebsd.org --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Aug 16 13:00:17 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01088DDA9B9 for ; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 13:00:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E34BB825EE for ; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 13:00:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v7GD0GdT069294 for ; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 13:00:16 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 221418] FreeBSD 10.4-PRERELEASE fails to build on systems using 32 bit time_t since r322315. Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2017 13:00:16 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.3-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: patch X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: jau@iki.fi X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2017 13:00:17 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D221418 --- Comment #3 from jau@iki.fi --- To Conrad I have to point out that truncating INT64_MIN to 32 bits might produce INT32_MIN on a big endian system. On a little endian platform the type cast invariably produces a plain zero (0). Concerning my using CHAR_BIT instead of plain numeric 8 I have to say I like portability enough to assume someone some day might wish to use FreeBSD on a system which does not use the 8/16/32/64 bits basic data units division our contemporary systems use. Maybe one day there is a reason to run FreeBSD on a system using 9/18/36 data unit division like in the old PDP-10 or IBM 7094. When there is no real reason to use minimum time_t it is in my opinion really much better to use -(SYNCOOKIE_LIFETIME + 1) as done in the fix 322454. Thanks Michael! --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Aug 16 15:27:28 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EC44DE2452 for ; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 15:27:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 16CFA32ED for ; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 15:27:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v7GFRRLY058793 for ; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 15:27:27 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 221439] ix ethernet doesn't link to switch if vlans are enabled. Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2017 15:27:27 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.1-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: IntelNetworking X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: jeffrey.e.pieper@intel.com X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2017 15:27:28 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D221439 Jeff Pieper changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jeffrey.e.pieper@intel.com --- Comment #1 from Jeff Pieper --- We need more info: 1. Output of pciconf -lv 2. Contents of /etc/rc.conf 3. Contents of /boot/loader.conf 4. Switch model being used 5. Media type being used --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Aug 16 17:02:07 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 362F9DE6E2D for ; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 17:02:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 238AC66461 for ; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 17:02:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v7GH26n4039913 for ; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 17:02:07 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 221439] ix ethernet doesn't link to switch if vlans are enabled. Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2017 17:02:06 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.1-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: IntelNetworking X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: wojtek@puchar.net X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: attachments.created Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2017 17:02:07 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D221439 --- Comment #2 from Wojciech Puchar --- Created attachment 185491 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D185491&action= =3Dedit pciconf -lv --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Aug 16 17:02:29 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A08EDE6ED5 for ; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 17:02:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 773DA66549 for ; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 17:02:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v7GH2TIa043967 for ; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 17:02:29 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 221439] ix ethernet doesn't link to switch if vlans are enabled. Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2017 17:02:29 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.1-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: IntelNetworking X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: wojtek@puchar.net X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: attachments.created Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2017 17:02:29 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D221439 --- Comment #3 from Wojciech Puchar --- Created attachment 185492 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D185492&action= =3Dedit loader.conf --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Aug 16 17:04:01 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9AB5DB60DE for ; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 17:04:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 97C37666A0 for ; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 17:04:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v7GH41Aa046521 for ; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 17:04:01 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 221439] ix ethernet doesn't link to switch if vlans are enabled. Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2017 17:04:01 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.1-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: IntelNetworking X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: wojtek@puchar.net X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: attachments.created Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2017 17:04:01 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D221439 --- Comment #4 from Wojciech Puchar --- Created attachment 185493 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D185493&action= =3Dedit rc.conf - read comment with vlan it includes vlan0 in cloned interfaces, addm vlan0 in bridge0 and= =20 ifconfig_vlan0=3D"vlan 1157 vlandev ix0 up" --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Aug 16 17:04:43 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8D03DB61E4 for ; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 17:04:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D6A4466763 for ; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 17:04:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v7GH4hKv047817 for ; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 17:04:43 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 221439] ix ethernet doesn't link to switch if vlans are enabled. Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2017 17:04:43 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.1-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: IntelNetworking X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: wojtek@puchar.net X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2017 17:04:44 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D221439 --- Comment #5 from Wojciech Puchar --- as for switch type i wait for response - not my switch, i'm not physically close to the machine. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu Aug 17 03:51:35 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50D26DC6DFB for ; Thu, 17 Aug 2017 03:51:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dmahoney@isc.org) Received: from mx.pao1.isc.org (mx.pao1.isc.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:0:2::2b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx.pao1.isc.org", Issuer "COMODO RSA Organization Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3D47C83798 for ; Thu, 17 Aug 2017 03:51:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dmahoney@isc.org) Received: from bikeshed.isc.org (bikeshed.isc.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:3:d::19]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.pao1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D3DED34B7ED for ; Thu, 17 Aug 2017 03:51:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bikeshed.isc.org (Postfix, from userid 10302) id C7BFF216C1E; Thu, 17 Aug 2017 03:51:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bikeshed.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5FEB216C1C for ; Thu, 17 Aug 2017 03:51:25 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2017 03:51:25 +0000 (UTC) From: Dan Mahoney To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: How likely is it that we can get a kernel tweak for 11.1 so the tcpmd5.ko module works? Message-ID: User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (BSF 67 2015-01-07) X-OpenPGP-Key-ID: 0xE919EC51 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00, RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on mx.pao1.isc.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2017 03:51:35 -0000 All, Please see https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220170 Basically, there's a kernel module that's only usable if you've built a custom kernel with IPSEC_SUPPORT. Since to build a custom kernel you've going to rebuild this module anyway, I'm not sure why it was shipped in -base. ISC runs a lot of BGP routing daemons and many of the people we peer with require password auth as part of their peering policy. We were really hoping for our new platform to not need to invent extra mechanics to build/deploy custom kernels. How hard would it be to add: 1) IPSEC_SUPPORT to base without waiting for 11.2? (After all, IPSEC itself is already in the base kernel). or 2) Building another module that would add the necessary IPSEC_SUPPORT knobs so TCPMD5 loads without needing to modify the shipped kernel? -Dan Mahoney ISC From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu Aug 17 10:56:12 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FE3DDDAC2A for ; Thu, 17 Aug 2017 10:56:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zarychtam@plan-b.pwste.edu.pl) Received: from plan-b.pwste.edu.pl (plan-b.pwste.edu.pl [89.188.221.64]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "plan-b.pwste.edu.pl", Issuer "plan-b.pwste.edu.pl" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 001006C38A for ; Thu, 17 Aug 2017 10:56:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zarychtam@plan-b.pwste.edu.pl) Received: from plan-b.pwste.edu.pl (zarychtam@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by plan-b.pwste.edu.pl (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id v7HAoLXO018773 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 17 Aug 2017 12:50:21 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from zarychtam@plan-b.pwste.edu.pl) Received: (from zarychtam@localhost) by plan-b.pwste.edu.pl (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id v7HAoLZb018772 for freebsd-net@freebsd.org; Thu, 17 Aug 2017 12:50:21 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from zarychtam) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2017 12:50:21 +0200 From: Marek Zarychta To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How likely is it that we can get a kernel tweak for 11.1 so the tcpmd5.ko module works? Message-ID: <20170817105021.GA17388@plan-b.pwste.edu.pl> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="rwEMma7ioTxnRzrJ" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.3 (2017-05-23) X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2017 10:56:12 -0000 --rwEMma7ioTxnRzrJ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 03:51:25AM +0000, Dan Mahoney wrote: > All, >=20 > Please see https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D220170 >=20 > Basically, there's a kernel module that's only usable if you've built a= =20 > custom kernel with IPSEC_SUPPORT. Since to build a custom kernel you've= =20 > going to rebuild this module anyway, I'm not sure why it was shipped in= =20 > -base. >=20 > ISC runs a lot of BGP routing daemons and many of the people we peer with= =20 > require password auth as part of their peering policy. We were really=20 > hoping for our new platform to not need to invent extra mechanics to=20 > build/deploy custom kernels. >=20 > How hard would it be to add: >=20 > 1) IPSEC_SUPPORT to base without waiting for 11.2? (After all, IPSEC=20 > itself is already in the base kernel). >=20 > or >=20 > 2) Building another module that would add the necessary IPSEC_SUPPORT=20 > knobs so TCPMD5 loads without needing to modify the shipped kernel? >=20 +1 It would be even better to exchange IPSEC with IPSEC_SUPPORT in GENERIC. Both modules: IPSEC as well as TCPMD5 could be loaded at boot time or later. Best regards, --=20 Marek Zarychta --rwEMma7ioTxnRzrJ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCAAdFiEEMOqvKm6wKvS1/ZeCdZ/s//1SjSwFAlmVdOkACgkQdZ/s//1S jSwqOwgAoGDbgtsvMah1DzeGrkvuEYNkxKBEF0+XTaThqqCk1+k9zpQkDojgnS8x Cu1WvmaYfPZhqOQhcMv3dQ2rjyv3uS4X51YnDdfoYbnsZCFdgpek5zGCSn3S8fKM 20aAUO/iCkqc4//8W1Ryf0rR544vz5T2DJyo9tkQpLkO1ltXnV7JJbEzmq5FCeFq ivpc6f50arJ5o42DiSxlvViIX8kSqhlotB+cHpPkIdX3P9JXrBB/tHKuaUF6k6Sl T9OfDHHoWb94yBW1OfDiT6vKRVTHXZ+tzrEOXtdmuc281tEt277gQWxa+xEFu1Hl 3T68SunASN0a1zp4zu/zsHqn6L6DoA== =S9pF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --rwEMma7ioTxnRzrJ-- From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu Aug 17 21:17:06 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75547DD7C9A for ; Thu, 17 Aug 2017 21:17:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gpillai@vmware.com) Received: from NAM01-SN1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-sn1nam01on0082.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.32.82]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.protection.outlook.com", Issuer "Microsoft IT SSL SHA2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1FA1D65178 for ; Thu, 17 Aug 2017 21:17:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gpillai@vmware.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=onevmw.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-vmware-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=aBm5DbKBf36sh1cFn6h/7CzhrEXwGsYr3LuyNNA2QwQ=; b=T+YHDaPs4HCJIoDVL6eYejpbhBlGn/s0oQruDacYKdpHIArrzHzYQObgIf9KaPzx5O91XXMrWeUnYKt9eaVFpdNyxnCHs8MB7mJhPLmk+umBgL02g8tCMqMlomZjYTESWVW0sxFGV9WTMgpiQG751YKdeOPXYwl/OwSgvD3JQ/o= Received: from BN6PR05MB3074.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.172.145.144) by BN6PR05MB3633.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.174.235.17) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P256) id 15.1.1362.12; Thu, 17 Aug 2017 21:16:58 +0000 Received: from BN6PR05MB3074.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.172.145.144]) by BN6PR05MB3074.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.172.145.144]) with mapi id 15.01.1385.003; Thu, 17 Aug 2017 21:16:58 +0000 From: Gopakumar Pillai To: "freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org" Subject: Only last IP frag sent if ARP entry absent Thread-Topic: Only last IP frag sent if ARP entry absent Thread-Index: AQHTF54oAIaB9utuUkWJnCYLGMHoeg== Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2017 21:16:57 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=gpillai@vmware.com; x-originating-ip: [208.91.2.1] x-ms-publictraffictype: Email x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BN6PR05MB3633; 20:gFW+kbz2BbRlFaaPJYGPHnyKRw0vfgujlOItpEDA1N/zZiDImNjQ3/7fVZ+zuktlYi0Zqp/Jt1YIBHJ7e7dJuQnHjmyRSUBj4hAAMv6AZgWqhZSZrX6etmBhgylTKOS/+uWNkGDLQPJq0qSihRO67v4JZLSZ6f/gyw6T+8zdXlA= x-ms-exchange-antispam-srfa-diagnostics: SSOS; x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: b948137d-a78d-43b7-198f-08d4e5b54b4d x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(300000500095)(300135000095)(300000501095)(300135300095)(300000502095)(300135100095)(22001)(2017030254152)(300000503095)(300135400095)(2017052603031)(201703131423075)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(300000504095)(300135200095)(300000505095)(300135600095)(300000506095)(300135500095); SRVR:BN6PR05MB3633; x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BN6PR05MB3633: x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(21748063052155); x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(100000700101)(100105000095)(100000701101)(100105300095)(100000702101)(100105100095)(6040450)(601004)(2401047)(5005006)(8121501046)(100000703101)(100105400095)(93006095)(93001095)(10201501046)(3002001)(6041248)(20161123560025)(20161123562025)(20161123564025)(201703131423075)(201702281528075)(201703061421075)(201703061406153)(20161123555025)(20161123558100)(6072148)(201708071742011)(100000704101)(100105200095)(100000705101)(100105500095); SRVR:BN6PR05MB3633; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(100000800101)(100110000095)(100000801101)(100110300095)(100000802101)(100110100095)(100000803101)(100110400095)(100000804101)(100110200095)(100000805101)(100110500095); SRVR:BN6PR05MB3633; x-forefront-prvs: 0402872DA1 x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(6009001)(39860400002)(189002)(199003)(504964003)(66066001)(5660300001)(2900100001)(110136004)(6116002)(3846002)(6506006)(102836003)(83716003)(77096006)(6436002)(5640700003)(99286003)(53936002)(6512007)(54896002)(6306002)(86362001)(6486002)(105586002)(6916009)(36756003)(33656002)(106356001)(2351001)(101416001)(50986999)(54356999)(7736002)(25786009)(478600001)(3280700002)(81166006)(8936002)(8676002)(81156014)(14454004)(189998001)(82746002)(2906002)(97736004)(2501003)(3660700001)(68736007); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:BN6PR05MB3633; H:BN6PR05MB3074.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en; received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: vmware.com does not designate permitted sender hosts) spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99 spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: vmware.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 17 Aug 2017 21:16:57.9896 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: b39138ca-3cee-4b4a-a4d6-cd83d9dd62f0 X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BN6PR05MB3633 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2017 21:17:06 -0000 SGkgRnJlZUJTRCBOZXR3b3JraW5nIEd1cnVzLA0KSSBjYW1lIGFjcm9zcyBhbiBpc3N1ZSB3aXRo IGFuIG9sZCB2ZXJzaW9uIG9mIEZyZWVCU0QgYW5kIGxvb2tpbmcgYXQgdGhlIGxhdGVzdCBGcmVl QlNEIGNvZGUsIHNlZW1zIGl0IGV4aXN0cyBldmVuIG5vdy4gSSBhbSBhc3N1bWluZyB0aGF0IHRo aXMgaXNzdWUgaXMgbm90IHJlcG9ydGVkLg0KDQpPYnNlcnZhdGlvbjoNCldoZW4gYSBwaW5nIHdh cyBwZXJmb3JtZWQgd2l0aCBsYXJnZXIgcGF5bG9hZCB0aGFuIE1UVSwgdGhlIGZpcnN0IHBpbmcg ZmFpbGVkIHdoZW4gdGhlIEFSUCBlbnRyeSB3YXMgYWJzZW50IGZvciB0aGF0IElQLg0KDQpOb3Rp Y2VkIG9uIHRoZSB3aXJlIHRoYXQgdGhlIGxhc3QgSVAgZnJhZ21lbnQgd2FzIHNlbnQgZm9yIHRo ZSBmaXJzdCByZXF1ZXN0IGFuZCB0aGVuIHRoZSBzdWJzZXF1ZW50IHJlcXVlc3RzIHdlcmUgZmlu ZS4NCg0KUm9vdCBDYXVzZToNCiAgKiBpcF9vdXRwdXQgZnJhZ21lbnRzIHRoZSBwYWNrZXRzIGFu ZCBsb29wcyB0aHJvdWdoIHRoZSBmcmFnbWVudHMgdG8gc2VuZCB0aGVtIHRvIGV0aGVyX291dHB1 dC4NCiAgKiBldGhlcl9vdXRwdXQgZG9lcyBhbiBhcnByZXNvbHZlIGFuZCBpZiB0aGVyZSBpcyBu byBleGlzdGluZyBBUlAgZW50cnkgaXQnbGwgcmV0dXJuIEVXT1VMREJMT0NLIGFmdGVyIHNlbmRp bmcgQVJQIFJlcXVlc3QuDQogICogZXRoZXJfb3V0cHV0IGlnbm9yZXMgdGhlIGVycm9yIGFuZCBw cm9wYWdhdGVzIHN1Y2Nlc3MgdG8gaXBfb3V0cHV0IGFuZCBpdCBjb250aW51ZXMgdG8gc2VuZCB0 aGUgcmVtYWluaW5nIGZyYWdtZW50cy4NCiAgKiBsbGVudHJ5IGtlZXBzIG9ubHkgb25lIG1idWYg YW5kIHRoZSBsYXN0IGZyYWdtZW50IGlzIHJldGFpbmVkIHdoZW4gdGhlIEFSUCBSZXBseSBjb21l cyBhbmQgdGhlIGZyYWdtZW50IGlzIHNlbnQuDQoNCkZpeDoNCiAgKiBFeHBvc2UgdGhlIEVXT1VM REJMT0NLIGVycm9yIGZyb20gZXRoZXJfb3V0cHV0IHRvIGlwX291dHB1dCAtIGJ1dCBub3QgYmV5 b25kIHRoYXQuDQogICogSW4gaXBfb3V0cHV0IHdoaWxlIHNlbmRpbmcgZnJhZ21lbnRzIGlmIHdl IGdldCB0aGUgRVdPVUxEQkxPQ0sgZXJyb3IsIHBvcHVsYXRlIHRoZSBtX25leHRwa3QgcG9pbnRl cg0KICAgIHNvIHRoYXQgdGhlIGVudGlyZSBtYnVmIGNoYWluIG9mIGZyYWdtZW50cyBhcmUga2Vw dCBhcm91bmQgdW50aWwgdGhlIEFSUCByZXBseSBjb21lcy4NCiAgKiBNb2RpZnkgaW5fYXJwaW5w dXQgZnVuY3Rpb24gY2FsbCAoKmlmcC0+aWZfb3V0cHV0KSBpbiBhIGxvb3AgdW50aWwgeW91IGV4 aGF1c3QgdGhlIG1idWYgY2hhaW4uDQoNCg0KVGhpcyBmaXggaXMgd29ya2luZy4gQnV0IHdhbnRl ZCB0byBrbm93IGlmIHRoZXJlIHdhcyBhIGJldHRlciB3YXkgdG8gZml4IHRoaXMgb3Igbm90Lg0K DQpPbmNlIHRoaXMgZml4IGlzIGZpbmFsLCBJIGNhbiBwcm92aWRlIHRoZSBwYXRjaCB0byBGcmVl QlNELg0KDQpUaGFuayBZb3UgaW4gYWR2YW5jZS4NCg0KLS1Hb3B1DQoNCg== From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu Aug 17 21:41:07 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8955FDD92BE for ; Thu, 17 Aug 2017 21:41:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net) Received: from mx1.sbone.de (mx1.sbone.de [IPv6:2a01:4f8:130:3ffc::401:25]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx1.sbone.de", Issuer "SBone.DE" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BD5265F1D for ; Thu, 17 Aug 2017 21:41:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net) Received: from mail.sbone.de (mail.sbone.de [IPv6:fde9:577b:c1a9:31::2013:587]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.sbone.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4EF4925D38A5; Thu, 17 Aug 2017 21:41:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from content-filter.sbone.de (content-filter.sbone.de [IPv6:fde9:577b:c1a9:31::2013:2742]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.sbone.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 666DDD1F815; Thu, 17 Aug 2017 21:41:03 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at sbone.de Received: from mail.sbone.de ([IPv6:fde9:577b:c1a9:31::2013:587]) by content-filter.sbone.de (content-filter.sbone.de [fde9:577b:c1a9:31::2013:2742]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dHD8JgXOmeTs; Thu, 17 Aug 2017 21:41:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.124.1] (unknown [IPv6:fde9:577b:c1a9:31:2ef0:eeff:fe03:ee34]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.sbone.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E0C75D1F808; Thu, 17 Aug 2017 21:40:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" To: "Gopakumar Pillai" Cc: "freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org" Subject: Re: Only last IP frag sent if ARP entry absent Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2017 21:40:57 +0000 Message-ID: <43CC3432-DB42-4170-B3E7-E305561973F3@lists.zabbadoz.net> In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailer: MailMate (2.0BETAr6090) X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2017 21:41:07 -0000 On 17 Aug 2017, at 21:16, Gopakumar Pillai wrote: > Hi FreeBSD Networking Gurus, > I came across an issue with an old version of FreeBSD and looking at > the latest FreeBSD code, seems it exists even now. I am assuming that > this issue is not reported. > > Observation: > When a ping was performed with larger payload than MTU, the first ping > failed when the ARP entry was absent for that IP. That is because ping/ICMP has no retransmit. > Noticed on the wire that the last IP fragment was sent for the first > request and then the subsequent requests were fine. > > Root Cause: > * ip_output fragments the packets and loops through the fragments to > send them to ether_output. > * ether_output does an arpresolve and if there is no existing ARP > entry it'll return EWOULDBLOCK after sending ARP Request. > * ether_output ignores the error and propagates success to ip_output > and it continues to send the remaining fragments. > * llentry keeps only one mbuf and the last fragment is retained when > the ARP Reply comes and the fragment is sent. Yes, according to the spec (RFC) we are supposed to throw the packet away entirely and simply report that to the next upper layer. However over the years people realised that this sucks for a TCP SYN packet with a retransmit timer and hence we store one of them. A large UDP packet would btw see the same behaviour to your ping. There’s no guarantee any of these packets will not be dropped anywhere on the network, so we can as well. Just my 2ct /bz From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu Aug 17 23:39:30 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 959DDDDF31D for ; Thu, 17 Aug 2017 23:39:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gpillai@vmware.com) Received: from NAM03-DM3-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-dm3nam03on0078.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.41.78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.protection.outlook.com", Issuer "Microsoft IT SSL SHA2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B24369CA3 for ; Thu, 17 Aug 2017 23:39:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gpillai@vmware.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=onevmw.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-vmware-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=/NLkU0LEcSJ4GPVHT2Sdbv7LepFhSrryi+OE8B0g4D8=; b=EZxczxHunYfMKr1z5weGQmTD9UFSKLus9RxcZfzc5UdZaTYKcklgqIC7DBWHo1G+ELKz8ZxxBg/MX7A+uHBYN3suZ79aSiyW3XQt19mDyGlrcmXpqnf0Rap6XPbA4Aw6XdybPlv7uy/gZWbpxJvZZG3Yc1Ez7WBWB+rbfngn5BU= Received: from BN6PR05MB3074.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.172.145.144) by BN6PR05MB3153.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.172.146.19) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P256) id 15.1.1385.4; Thu, 17 Aug 2017 23:39:28 +0000 Received: from BN6PR05MB3074.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.172.145.144]) by BN6PR05MB3074.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.172.145.144]) with mapi id 15.01.1385.003; Thu, 17 Aug 2017 23:39:28 +0000 From: Gopakumar Pillai To: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" CC: "freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org" Subject: Re: Only last IP frag sent if ARP entry absent Thread-Topic: Only last IP frag sent if ARP entry absent Thread-Index: AQHTF54oAIaB9utuUkWJnCYLGMHoeqKJE8iA//+rw4A= Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2017 23:39:28 +0000 Message-ID: References: <43CC3432-DB42-4170-B3E7-E305561973F3@lists.zabbadoz.net> In-Reply-To: <43CC3432-DB42-4170-B3E7-E305561973F3@lists.zabbadoz.net> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=gpillai@vmware.com; x-originating-ip: [208.91.2.1] x-ms-publictraffictype: Email x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BN6PR05MB3153; 20:qXKDWsA3k9+HR/cbeG+BjhD/VICl3UxQ5oB2cKBf//Az630WTDO3nskvCMtlODvqXRXOuuX+G96WfrdZGH5yPzi5Xbx4QSjDaAA1nxtR0L8EsUbS9CI+a/7xKVDFP4WNlvFSKgCfjL4QvXBb3xFo8R6YCZfB7AH6dyUdgo5o0wo= x-ms-exchange-antispam-srfa-diagnostics: SSOS; x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 3ca87c96-3903-4990-10ef-08d4e5c933aa x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(300000500095)(300135000095)(300000501095)(300135300095)(22001)(300000502095)(300135100095)(2017030254152)(300000503095)(300135400095)(2017052603031)(201703131423075)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(300000504095)(300135200095)(300000505095)(300135600095)(300000506095)(300135500095); SRVR:BN6PR05MB3153; x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BN6PR05MB3153: x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:; x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(100000700101)(100105000095)(100000701101)(100105300095)(100000702101)(100105100095)(6040450)(601004)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(3002001)(100000703101)(100105400095)(10201501046)(93006095)(93001095)(6041248)(20161123560025)(20161123562025)(201703131423075)(201702281528075)(201703061421075)(201703061406153)(20161123558100)(20161123555025)(20161123564025)(6072148)(201708071742011)(100000704101)(100105200095)(100000705101)(100105500095); SRVR:BN6PR05MB3153; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(100000800101)(100110000095)(100000801101)(100110300095)(100000802101)(100110100095)(100000803101)(100110400095)(100000804101)(100110200095)(100000805101)(100110500095); SRVR:BN6PR05MB3153; x-forefront-prvs: 0402872DA1 x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(6009001)(189002)(24454002)(377454003)(199003)(478600001)(5660300001)(33656002)(99286003)(8936002)(2900100001)(4326008)(6512007)(81156014)(81166006)(68736007)(6116002)(102836003)(6916009)(83716003)(97736004)(3846002)(2950100002)(105586002)(6246003)(106356001)(86362001)(6486002)(25786009)(6506006)(6436002)(110136004)(36756003)(82746002)(53936002)(77096006)(2906002)(189998001)(14454004)(53546010)(8676002)(101416001)(66066001)(305945005)(229853002)(50986999)(7736002)(3280700002)(76176999)(54356999)(3660700001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:BN6PR05MB3153; H:BN6PR05MB3074.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en; received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: vmware.com does not designate permitted sender hosts) spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99 spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-ID: <5C313601FAE2B643A7E842C46643BED8@namprd05.prod.outlook.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: vmware.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 17 Aug 2017 23:39:28.1200 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: b39138ca-3cee-4b4a-a4d6-cd83d9dd62f0 X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BN6PR05MB3153 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2017 23:39:30 -0000 VGhhbmsgWW91IEJqb2Vybi4gQ291bGQgeW91IHBsZWFzZSBwb2ludCBtZSB0byB0aGUgUkZDPw0K DQpJZiB0aGlzIGlzIG5vdCBhIE1VU1QgYmVoYXZpb3IgaW4gUkZDLCB3b3VsZCBteSBmaXggYmUg Z29vZD8gSSBhZ3JlZSB0aGF0IHRoaXMgd291bGQgYWZmZWN0IG9ubHkgSUNNUC9VRFAgdHJhZmZp Yy4NCg0KLS1Hb3B1DQoNCg0KT24gOC8xNy8xNywgMjo0MCBQTSwgIkJqb2VybiBBLiBaZWViIiA8 YnplZWItbGlzdHNAbGlzdHMuemFiYmFkb3oubmV0PiB3cm90ZToNCg0KICAgIE9uIDE3IEF1ZyAy MDE3LCBhdCAyMToxNiwgR29wYWt1bWFyIFBpbGxhaSB3cm90ZToNCiAgICANCiAgICA+IEhpIEZy ZWVCU0QgTmV0d29ya2luZyBHdXJ1cywNCiAgICA+IEkgY2FtZSBhY3Jvc3MgYW4gaXNzdWUgd2l0 aCBhbiBvbGQgdmVyc2lvbiBvZiBGcmVlQlNEIGFuZCBsb29raW5nIGF0IA0KICAgID4gdGhlIGxh dGVzdCBGcmVlQlNEIGNvZGUsIHNlZW1zIGl0IGV4aXN0cyBldmVuIG5vdy4gSSBhbSBhc3N1bWlu ZyB0aGF0IA0KICAgID4gdGhpcyBpc3N1ZSBpcyBub3QgcmVwb3J0ZWQuDQogICAgPg0KICAgID4g T2JzZXJ2YXRpb246DQogICAgPiBXaGVuIGEgcGluZyB3YXMgcGVyZm9ybWVkIHdpdGggbGFyZ2Vy IHBheWxvYWQgdGhhbiBNVFUsIHRoZSBmaXJzdCBwaW5nIA0KICAgID4gZmFpbGVkIHdoZW4gdGhl IEFSUCBlbnRyeSB3YXMgYWJzZW50IGZvciB0aGF0IElQLg0KICAgIA0KICAgIFRoYXQgaXMgYmVj YXVzZSBwaW5nL0lDTVAgaGFzIG5vIHJldHJhbnNtaXQuDQogICAgDQogICAgDQogICAgPiBOb3Rp Y2VkIG9uIHRoZSB3aXJlIHRoYXQgdGhlIGxhc3QgSVAgZnJhZ21lbnQgd2FzIHNlbnQgZm9yIHRo ZSBmaXJzdCANCiAgICA+IHJlcXVlc3QgYW5kIHRoZW4gdGhlIHN1YnNlcXVlbnQgcmVxdWVzdHMg d2VyZSBmaW5lLg0KICAgID4NCiAgICA+IFJvb3QgQ2F1c2U6DQogICAgPiAgICogaXBfb3V0cHV0 IGZyYWdtZW50cyB0aGUgcGFja2V0cyBhbmQgbG9vcHMgdGhyb3VnaCB0aGUgZnJhZ21lbnRzIHRv IA0KICAgID4gc2VuZCB0aGVtIHRvIGV0aGVyX291dHB1dC4NCiAgICA+ICAgKiBldGhlcl9vdXRw dXQgZG9lcyBhbiBhcnByZXNvbHZlIGFuZCBpZiB0aGVyZSBpcyBubyBleGlzdGluZyBBUlAgDQog ICAgPiBlbnRyeSBpdCdsbCByZXR1cm4gRVdPVUxEQkxPQ0sgYWZ0ZXIgc2VuZGluZyBBUlAgUmVx dWVzdC4NCiAgICA+ICAgKiBldGhlcl9vdXRwdXQgaWdub3JlcyB0aGUgZXJyb3IgYW5kIHByb3Bh Z2F0ZXMgc3VjY2VzcyB0byBpcF9vdXRwdXQgDQogICAgPiBhbmQgaXQgY29udGludWVzIHRvIHNl bmQgdGhlIHJlbWFpbmluZyBmcmFnbWVudHMuDQogICAgPiAgICogbGxlbnRyeSBrZWVwcyBvbmx5 IG9uZSBtYnVmIGFuZCB0aGUgbGFzdCBmcmFnbWVudCBpcyByZXRhaW5lZCB3aGVuIA0KICAgID4g dGhlIEFSUCBSZXBseSBjb21lcyBhbmQgdGhlIGZyYWdtZW50IGlzIHNlbnQuDQogICAgDQogICAg WWVzLCBhY2NvcmRpbmcgdG8gdGhlIHNwZWMgKFJGQykgd2UgYXJlIHN1cHBvc2VkIHRvIHRocm93 IHRoZSBwYWNrZXQgDQogICAgYXdheSBlbnRpcmVseSBhbmQgc2ltcGx5IHJlcG9ydCB0aGF0IHRv IHRoZSBuZXh0IHVwcGVyIGxheWVyLiAgSG93ZXZlciANCiAgICBvdmVyIHRoZSB5ZWFycyBwZW9w bGUgcmVhbGlzZWQgdGhhdCB0aGlzIHN1Y2tzIGZvciBhIFRDUCBTWU4gcGFja2V0IHdpdGggDQog ICAgYSByZXRyYW5zbWl0IHRpbWVyIGFuZCBoZW5jZSB3ZSBzdG9yZSBvbmUgb2YgdGhlbS4NCiAg ICANCiAgICBBIGxhcmdlIFVEUCBwYWNrZXQgd291bGQgYnR3IHNlZSB0aGUgc2FtZSBiZWhhdmlv dXIgdG8geW91ciBwaW5nLiAgIA0KICAgIFRoZXJl4oCZcyBubyBndWFyYW50ZWUgYW55IG9mIHRo ZXNlIHBhY2tldHMgd2lsbCBub3QgYmUgZHJvcHBlZCBhbnl3aGVyZSANCiAgICBvbiB0aGUgbmV0 d29yaywgc28gd2UgY2FuIGFzIHdlbGwuDQogICAgDQogICAgSnVzdCBteSAyY3QNCiAgICANCiAg ICAvYnoNCiAgICANCg0K From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Aug 18 00:15:16 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 257F5DE13D6 for ; Fri, 18 Aug 2017 00:15:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 138DB6AF59 for ; Fri, 18 Aug 2017 00:15:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v7I0FFaO071428 for ; Fri, 18 Aug 2017 00:15:15 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 221418] FreeBSD 10.4-PRERELEASE fails to build on systems using 32 bit time_t since r322315. Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2017 00:15:16 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.3-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: patch X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: emaste@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: resolution bug_status Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2017 00:15:16 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D221418 Ed Maste changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|New |Closed --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Aug 18 03:47:39 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45460DC62DD for ; Fri, 18 Aug 2017 03:47:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike@karels.net) Received: from mail.karels.net (mail.karels.net [63.231.190.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE53871639 for ; Fri, 18 Aug 2017 03:47:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike@karels.net) Received: from [10.0.2.11] (mjk-mac2.karels.net [10.0.2.11]) by mail.karels.net (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v7I3XfjN084985; Thu, 17 Aug 2017 22:33:41 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from mike@karels.net) From: "Mike Karels" To: "Gopakumar Pillai" Cc: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" , "freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org" Subject: Re: Only last IP frag sent if ARP entry absent Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2017 22:33:31 -0500 Message-ID: <9B1B1A12-CD9F-4A9F-B596-A2F6E5BAED1E@karels.net> In-Reply-To: References: <43CC3432-DB42-4170-B3E7-E305561973F3@lists.zabbadoz.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MailMate (1.9.6r5347) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2017 03:47:39 -0000 Another $.02 (inline): On 17 Aug 2017, at 18:39, Gopakumar Pillai wrote: > Thank You Bjoern. Could you please point me to the RFC? I don=E2=80=99t know if there is anything more recent than RFC1122 on thi= s. =20 IIRC, it requires queuing at least one packet. Queing one packet is=20 what BSD has done essentially since ARP was implemented. > If this is not a MUST behavior in RFC, would my fix be good? I agree=20 > that this would affect only ICMP/UDP traffic. People have been asking for queuing of multiple packets for years. That=20 is a more general change. Consider another dumb application that starts=20 out by sending multiple UDP packets back-to-back. However,=20 well-designed application protocols don=E2=80=99t experience problems lik= e=20 this. I=E2=80=99ll quickly note that ping isn=E2=80=99t an application, = but a=20 network measuring tool. If you ask the question =E2=80=9Cwhat happens if= I=20 start off a session with a single large packet and I don=E2=80=99t suppor= t=20 retransmission=E2=80=9D, ping answers that question correctly. If badly-designed protocols get bad performance, that doesn=E2=80=99t see= m=20 like a bug to me, but a feature. > On 8/17/17, 2:40 PM, "Bjoern A. Zeeb" =20 > wrote: > > On 17 Aug 2017, at 21:16, Gopakumar Pillai wrote: > > > Hi FreeBSD Networking Gurus, > > I came across an issue with an old version of FreeBSD and=20 > looking at > > the latest FreeBSD code, seems it exists even now. I am assuming=20 > that > > this issue is not reported. > > > > Observation: > > When a ping was performed with larger payload than MTU, the=20 > first ping > > failed when the ARP entry was absent for that IP. > > That is because ping/ICMP has no retransmit. > > > > Noticed on the wire that the last IP fragment was sent for the=20 > first > > request and then the subsequent requests were fine. > > > > Root Cause: > > * ip_output fragments the packets and loops through the=20 > fragments to > > send them to ether_output. > > * ether_output does an arpresolve and if there is no existing=20 > ARP > > entry it'll return EWOULDBLOCK after sending ARP Request. > > * ether_output ignores the error and propagates success to=20 > ip_output > > and it continues to send the remaining fragments. > > * llentry keeps only one mbuf and the last fragment is=20 > retained when > > the ARP Reply comes and the fragment is sent. > > Yes, according to the spec (RFC) we are supposed to throw the=20 > packet > away entirely and simply report that to the next upper layer. =20 > However > over the years people realised that this sucks for a TCP SYN=20 > packet with > a retransmit timer and hence we store one of them. > > A large UDP packet would btw see the same behaviour to your ping. > There=E2=80=99s no guarantee any of these packets will not be dropp= ed=20 > anywhere > on the network, so we can as well. > > Just my 2ct > > /bz Mike From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Aug 18 04:36:10 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C98B9DC94BA for ; Fri, 18 Aug 2017 04:36:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gpillai@vmware.com) Received: from NAM03-CO1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-co1nam03on0045.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.40.45]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.protection.outlook.com", Issuer "Microsoft IT SSL SHA2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 724D172F99 for ; Fri, 18 Aug 2017 04:36:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gpillai@vmware.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=onevmw.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-vmware-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=r1I6uWVXJSgJhXhQqxf7LI8Vxr6shEwQsVu/8MS4UlY=; b=qt1eQ9+VzMiF7XqQftRtl0K2AAQkFLGb/Kl3R3FPFoYPq/MaRgsB2pOPBCTuUZ2AC/S9GeKJAwLPpJ6qLOnXFGo3aDHR1ZLocUcpo44I7JsPg6JSmELzb1D436WMveioyJ+El+LBKffdguLfLXGPXDt0MX2asw7M+dFpUAumYfM= Received: from DM5PR05MB3081.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.173.218.143) by DM5PR05MB3561.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.174.242.154) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P256) id 15.1.1385.4; Fri, 18 Aug 2017 04:36:07 +0000 Received: from DM5PR05MB3081.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.173.218.143]) by DM5PR05MB3081.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.173.218.143]) with mapi id 15.01.1385.005; Fri, 18 Aug 2017 04:36:07 +0000 From: Gopakumar Pillai To: Mike Karels CC: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" , "freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org" Subject: Re: Only last IP frag sent if ARP entry absent Thread-Topic: Only last IP frag sent if ARP entry absent Thread-Index: AQHTF54oAIaB9utuUkWJnCYLGMHoeqKJE8iA//+rw4CAALa/gP//nCMA Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2017 04:36:07 +0000 Message-ID: References: <43CC3432-DB42-4170-B3E7-E305561973F3@lists.zabbadoz.net> <9B1B1A12-CD9F-4A9F-B596-A2F6E5BAED1E@karels.net> In-Reply-To: <9B1B1A12-CD9F-4A9F-B596-A2F6E5BAED1E@karels.net> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=gpillai@vmware.com; x-originating-ip: [67.169.166.146] x-ms-publictraffictype: Email x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; DM5PR05MB3561; 20:+Xi1Ny2/VUU3h5WcemW1X+xSQ216Gv9cMHFzUZd1i5lKOB/XFIgft9PZzM/EJJqzY2TvIiHzpmVC/R3CI6Q/KSJ61l57kryukBYE4fqb6+z+VTgcf9kKg9aUpNpr9NRYTUCxqM4RjBvSMg9uPX///vb6RRttd8/9eBMRP+AZi0M= x-ms-exchange-antispam-srfa-diagnostics: SSOS; x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 20ac7f66-0b86-42a1-6941-08d4e5f2a4bf x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(300000500095)(300135000095)(300000501095)(300135300095)(22001)(300000502095)(300135100095)(2017030254152)(300000503095)(300135400095)(2017052603031)(201703131423075)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(300000504095)(300135200095)(300000505095)(300135600095)(300000506095)(300135500095); SRVR:DM5PR05MB3561; x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: DM5PR05MB3561: x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(61668805478150)(278428928389397)(21748063052155); x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(100000700101)(100105000095)(100000701101)(100105300095)(100000702101)(100105100095)(6040450)(601004)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(3002001)(93006095)(93001095)(100000703101)(100105400095)(10201501046)(6041248)(20161123562025)(20161123564025)(20161123555025)(201703131423075)(201702281528075)(201703061421075)(201703061406153)(20161123558100)(20161123560025)(6072148)(201708071742011)(100000704101)(100105200095)(100000705101)(100105500095); SRVR:DM5PR05MB3561; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(100000800101)(100110000095)(100000801101)(100110300095)(100000802101)(100110100095)(100000803101)(100110400095)(100000804101)(100110200095)(100000805101)(100110500095); SRVR:DM5PR05MB3561; x-forefront-prvs: 040359335D x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(6009001)(24454002)(199003)(377454003)(189002)(82746002)(6506006)(6486002)(83716003)(77096006)(102836003)(4326008)(6116002)(229853002)(14454004)(33656002)(7736002)(93886005)(25786009)(478600001)(6916009)(86362001)(68736007)(5660300001)(6436002)(2950100002)(3846002)(97736004)(53546010)(54356999)(6246003)(105586002)(106356001)(81156014)(101416001)(50986999)(76176999)(6512007)(99286003)(8676002)(54906002)(8936002)(54896002)(53936002)(3660700001)(3280700002)(189998001)(66066001)(110136004)(2906002)(6306002)(36756003)(2900100001)(81166006); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:DM5PR05MB3561; H:DM5PR05MB3081.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en; received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: vmware.com does not designate permitted sender hosts) spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99 spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: vmware.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 18 Aug 2017 04:36:07.3686 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: b39138ca-3cee-4b4a-a4d6-cd83d9dd62f0 X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DM5PR05MB3561 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2017 04:36:10 -0000 VGhhbmsgWW91IEJqb2VybiBhbmQgTWlrZS4NCg0KV2hpbGUgSSBhZ3JlZSB3aXRoIHlvdSBNaWtl IHRoYXQgcGluZyBjYW4gZmFpbCwgYSBVRFAgYXBwbGljYXRpb24gY291bGQgYWxzbyBiZSBhZmZl Y3RlZCDigJMgaWYgaXRzIHNlbmRpbmcgPk1UVSBkYXRhIGFuZCBpZiBBUlAgZW50cnkgaXMgYWJz ZW50LiBBbmQgZXRoZXJfb3V0cHV0IHdvdWxkbuKAmXQgZXZlbiB0ZWxsIHRoZSBhcHAgaWYgdGhl IHNlbmRpbmcgZmFpbGVkIG9yIG5vdCAoYXMgcGVyIGV4aXN0aW5nIGNvZGUpLiBBZ3JlZSB0aGF0 IGJhZGx5IHdyaXR0ZW4gYXBwbGljYXRpb25zIHdvdWxkIHN1ZmZlciB0aGUgbW9zdC4gTXkgZml4 IG9ubHkgaGVscHMgYXBwbGljYXRpb25zLg0KDQpJIGd1ZXNzIEkgYW0gbm90IHRvdGFsbHkgb3V0 IG9mIGxpbmUuDQoNCkJ1dCBub3Qgc3VyZSB3aGV0aGVyIEkgc2hvdWxkIGNoZWNraW4gdGhpcyBm aXggb3Igbm90ISDimLoNCg0KVGhhbmsgWW91IGFnYWluLg0KDQotLUdvcHUNCg0KDQoNCkZyb206 IE1pa2UgS2FyZWxzIDxtaWtlQGthcmVscy5uZXQ+DQpEYXRlOiBUaHVyc2RheSwgQXVndXN0IDE3 LCAyMDE3IGF0IDg6MzMgUE0NClRvOiBHb3Bha3VtYXIgUGlsbGFpIDxncGlsbGFpQHZtd2FyZS5j b20+DQpDYzogIkJqb2VybiBBLiBaZWViIiA8YnplZWItbGlzdHNAbGlzdHMuemFiYmFkb3oubmV0 PiwgImZyZWVic2QtbmV0QEZyZWVCU0Qub3JnIiA8ZnJlZWJzZC1uZXRARnJlZUJTRC5vcmc+DQpT dWJqZWN0OiBSZTogT25seSBsYXN0IElQIGZyYWcgc2VudCBpZiBBUlAgZW50cnkgYWJzZW50DQoN Cg0KQW5vdGhlciAkLjAyIChpbmxpbmUpOg0KDQpPbiAxNyBBdWcgMjAxNywgYXQgMTg6MzksIEdv cGFrdW1hciBQaWxsYWkgd3JvdGU6DQoNClRoYW5rIFlvdSBCam9lcm4uIENvdWxkIHlvdSBwbGVh c2UgcG9pbnQgbWUgdG8gdGhlIFJGQz8NCg0KSSBkb27igJl0IGtub3cgaWYgdGhlcmUgaXMgYW55 dGhpbmcgbW9yZSByZWNlbnQgdGhhbiBSRkMxMTIyIG9uIHRoaXMuIElJUkMsIGl0IHJlcXVpcmVz IHF1ZXVpbmcgYXQgbGVhc3Qgb25lIHBhY2tldC4gUXVlaW5nIG9uZSBwYWNrZXQgaXMgd2hhdCBC U0QgaGFzIGRvbmUgZXNzZW50aWFsbHkgc2luY2UgQVJQIHdhcyBpbXBsZW1lbnRlZC4NCg0KSWYg dGhpcyBpcyBub3QgYSBNVVNUIGJlaGF2aW9yIGluIFJGQywgd291bGQgbXkgZml4IGJlIGdvb2Q/ IEkgYWdyZWUgdGhhdCB0aGlzIHdvdWxkIGFmZmVjdCBvbmx5IElDTVAvVURQIHRyYWZmaWMuDQoN ClBlb3BsZSBoYXZlIGJlZW4gYXNraW5nIGZvciBxdWV1aW5nIG9mIG11bHRpcGxlIHBhY2tldHMg Zm9yIHllYXJzLiBUaGF0IGlzIGEgbW9yZSBnZW5lcmFsIGNoYW5nZS4gQ29uc2lkZXIgYW5vdGhl ciBkdW1iIGFwcGxpY2F0aW9uIHRoYXQgc3RhcnRzIG91dCBieSBzZW5kaW5nIG11bHRpcGxlIFVE UCBwYWNrZXRzIGJhY2stdG8tYmFjay4gSG93ZXZlciwgd2VsbC1kZXNpZ25lZCBhcHBsaWNhdGlv biBwcm90b2NvbHMgZG9u4oCZdCBleHBlcmllbmNlIHByb2JsZW1zIGxpa2UgdGhpcy4gSeKAmWxs IHF1aWNrbHkgbm90ZSB0aGF0IHBpbmcgaXNu4oCZdCBhbiBhcHBsaWNhdGlvbiwgYnV0IGEgbmV0 d29yayBtZWFzdXJpbmcgdG9vbC4gSWYgeW91IGFzayB0aGUgcXVlc3Rpb24g4oCcd2hhdCBoYXBw ZW5zIGlmIEkgc3RhcnQgb2ZmIGEgc2Vzc2lvbiB3aXRoIGEgc2luZ2xlIGxhcmdlIHBhY2tldCBh bmQgSSBkb27igJl0IHN1cHBvcnQgcmV0cmFuc21pc3Npb27igJ0sIHBpbmcgYW5zd2VycyB0aGF0 IHF1ZXN0aW9uIGNvcnJlY3RseS4NCg0KSWYgYmFkbHktZGVzaWduZWQgcHJvdG9jb2xzIGdldCBi YWQgcGVyZm9ybWFuY2UsIHRoYXQgZG9lc27igJl0IHNlZW0gbGlrZSBhIGJ1ZyB0byBtZSwgYnV0 IGEgZmVhdHVyZS4NCg0KT24gOC8xNy8xNywgMjo0MCBQTSwgIkJqb2VybiBBLiBaZWViIiA8Ynpl ZWItbGlzdHNAbGlzdHMuemFiYmFkb3oubmV0PiB3cm90ZToNCg0KT24gMTcgQXVnIDIwMTcsIGF0 IDIxOjE2LCBHb3Bha3VtYXIgUGlsbGFpIHdyb3RlOg0KDQo+IEhpIEZyZWVCU0QgTmV0d29ya2lu ZyBHdXJ1cywNCj4gSSBjYW1lIGFjcm9zcyBhbiBpc3N1ZSB3aXRoIGFuIG9sZCB2ZXJzaW9uIG9m IEZyZWVCU0QgYW5kIGxvb2tpbmcgYXQNCj4gdGhlIGxhdGVzdCBGcmVlQlNEIGNvZGUsIHNlZW1z IGl0IGV4aXN0cyBldmVuIG5vdy4gSSBhbSBhc3N1bWluZyB0aGF0DQo+IHRoaXMgaXNzdWUgaXMg bm90IHJlcG9ydGVkLg0KPg0KPiBPYnNlcnZhdGlvbjoNCj4gV2hlbiBhIHBpbmcgd2FzIHBlcmZv cm1lZCB3aXRoIGxhcmdlciBwYXlsb2FkIHRoYW4gTVRVLCB0aGUgZmlyc3QgcGluZw0KPiBmYWls ZWQgd2hlbiB0aGUgQVJQIGVudHJ5IHdhcyBhYnNlbnQgZm9yIHRoYXQgSVAuDQoNClRoYXQgaXMg YmVjYXVzZSBwaW5nL0lDTVAgaGFzIG5vIHJldHJhbnNtaXQuDQoNCg0KPiBOb3RpY2VkIG9uIHRo ZSB3aXJlIHRoYXQgdGhlIGxhc3QgSVAgZnJhZ21lbnQgd2FzIHNlbnQgZm9yIHRoZSBmaXJzdA0K PiByZXF1ZXN0IGFuZCB0aGVuIHRoZSBzdWJzZXF1ZW50IHJlcXVlc3RzIHdlcmUgZmluZS4NCj4N Cj4gUm9vdCBDYXVzZToNCj4gKiBpcF9vdXRwdXQgZnJhZ21lbnRzIHRoZSBwYWNrZXRzIGFuZCBs b29wcyB0aHJvdWdoIHRoZSBmcmFnbWVudHMgdG8NCj4gc2VuZCB0aGVtIHRvIGV0aGVyX291dHB1 dC4NCj4gKiBldGhlcl9vdXRwdXQgZG9lcyBhbiBhcnByZXNvbHZlIGFuZCBpZiB0aGVyZSBpcyBu byBleGlzdGluZyBBUlANCj4gZW50cnkgaXQnbGwgcmV0dXJuIEVXT1VMREJMT0NLIGFmdGVyIHNl bmRpbmcgQVJQIFJlcXVlc3QuDQo+ICogZXRoZXJfb3V0cHV0IGlnbm9yZXMgdGhlIGVycm9yIGFu ZCBwcm9wYWdhdGVzIHN1Y2Nlc3MgdG8gaXBfb3V0cHV0DQo+IGFuZCBpdCBjb250aW51ZXMgdG8g c2VuZCB0aGUgcmVtYWluaW5nIGZyYWdtZW50cy4NCj4gKiBsbGVudHJ5IGtlZXBzIG9ubHkgb25l IG1idWYgYW5kIHRoZSBsYXN0IGZyYWdtZW50IGlzIHJldGFpbmVkIHdoZW4NCj4gdGhlIEFSUCBS ZXBseSBjb21lcyBhbmQgdGhlIGZyYWdtZW50IGlzIHNlbnQuDQoNClllcywgYWNjb3JkaW5nIHRv IHRoZSBzcGVjIChSRkMpIHdlIGFyZSBzdXBwb3NlZCB0byB0aHJvdyB0aGUgcGFja2V0DQphd2F5 IGVudGlyZWx5IGFuZCBzaW1wbHkgcmVwb3J0IHRoYXQgdG8gdGhlIG5leHQgdXBwZXIgbGF5ZXIu IEhvd2V2ZXINCm92ZXIgdGhlIHllYXJzIHBlb3BsZSByZWFsaXNlZCB0aGF0IHRoaXMgc3Vja3Mg Zm9yIGEgVENQIFNZTiBwYWNrZXQgd2l0aA0KYSByZXRyYW5zbWl0IHRpbWVyIGFuZCBoZW5jZSB3 ZSBzdG9yZSBvbmUgb2YgdGhlbS4NCg0KQSBsYXJnZSBVRFAgcGFja2V0IHdvdWxkIGJ0dyBzZWUg dGhlIHNhbWUgYmVoYXZpb3VyIHRvIHlvdXIgcGluZy4NClRoZXJl4oCZcyBubyBndWFyYW50ZWUg YW55IG9mIHRoZXNlIHBhY2tldHMgd2lsbCBub3QgYmUgZHJvcHBlZCBhbnl3aGVyZQ0Kb24gdGhl IG5ldHdvcmssIHNvIHdlIGNhbiBhcyB3ZWxsLg0KDQpKdXN0IG15IDJjdA0KDQovYnoNCg0KICAg IE1pa2UNCg== From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Aug 18 04:44:25 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3026DC9E97 for ; Fri, 18 Aug 2017 04:44:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bakul@bitblocks.com) Received: from mail.bitblocks.com (ns1.bitblocks.com [173.228.5.8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B7AA73427 for ; Fri, 18 Aug 2017 04:44:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bakul@bitblocks.com) Received: from mob.bitblocks.com (mob.bitblocks.com [192.168.125.11]) by mail.bitblocks.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24BFD124AE9F; Thu, 17 Aug 2017 21:36:18 -0700 (PDT) From: Bakul Shah Message-Id: <80D8F4C8-7A02-4F0E-88A5-9A316FC6E99F@bitblocks.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\)) Subject: Re: Only last IP frag sent if ARP entry absent Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2017 21:36:17 -0700 In-Reply-To: <9B1B1A12-CD9F-4A9F-B596-A2F6E5BAED1E@karels.net> Cc: Gopakumar Pillai , "Bjoern A. Zeeb" , "freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org" To: Mike Karels References: <43CC3432-DB42-4170-B3E7-E305561973F3@lists.zabbadoz.net> <9B1B1A12-CD9F-4A9F-B596-A2F6E5BAED1E@karels.net> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2017 04:44:25 -0000 RFC 826 is the one that says this: If it does not, it probably informs the caller that it is throwing the packet away (on the assumption the packet will be retransmitted by a higher network layer) Not worth fixing for the reasons you mention.=20 > On Aug 17, 2017, at 8:33 PM, Mike Karels wrote: >=20 > Another $.02 (inline): >=20 > On 17 Aug 2017, at 18:39, Gopakumar Pillai wrote: >=20 >> Thank You Bjoern. Could you please point me to the RFC? >=20 > I don=E2=80=99t know if there is anything more recent than RFC1122 on = this. IIRC, it requires queuing at least one packet. Queing one packet = is what BSD has done essentially since ARP was implemented. >=20 >> If this is not a MUST behavior in RFC, would my fix be good? I agree = that this would affect only ICMP/UDP traffic. >=20 > People have been asking for queuing of multiple packets for years. = That is a more general change. Consider another dumb application that = starts out by sending multiple UDP packets back-to-back. However, = well-designed application protocols don=E2=80=99t experience problems = like this. I=E2=80=99ll quickly note that ping isn=E2=80=99t an = application, but a network measuring tool. If you ask the question = =E2=80=9Cwhat happens if I start off a session with a single large = packet and I don=E2=80=99t support retransmission=E2=80=9D, ping answers = that question correctly. >=20 > If badly-designed protocols get bad performance, that doesn=E2=80=99t = seem like a bug to me, but a feature. >=20 >> On 8/17/17, 2:40 PM, "Bjoern A. Zeeb" = wrote: >>=20 >> On 17 Aug 2017, at 21:16, Gopakumar Pillai wrote: >>=20 >> > Hi FreeBSD Networking Gurus, >> > I came across an issue with an old version of FreeBSD and = looking at >> > the latest FreeBSD code, seems it exists even now. I am assuming = that >> > this issue is not reported. >> > >> > Observation: >> > When a ping was performed with larger payload than MTU, the = first ping >> > failed when the ARP entry was absent for that IP. >>=20 >> That is because ping/ICMP has no retransmit. >>=20 >>=20 >> > Noticed on the wire that the last IP fragment was sent for the = first >> > request and then the subsequent requests were fine. >> > >> > Root Cause: >> > * ip_output fragments the packets and loops through the = fragments to >> > send them to ether_output. >> > * ether_output does an arpresolve and if there is no existing = ARP >> > entry it'll return EWOULDBLOCK after sending ARP Request. >> > * ether_output ignores the error and propagates success to = ip_output >> > and it continues to send the remaining fragments. >> > * llentry keeps only one mbuf and the last fragment is = retained when >> > the ARP Reply comes and the fragment is sent. >>=20 >> Yes, according to the spec (RFC) we are supposed to throw the = packet >> away entirely and simply report that to the next upper layer. = However >> over the years people realised that this sucks for a TCP SYN = packet with >> a retransmit timer and hence we store one of them. >>=20 >> A large UDP packet would btw see the same behaviour to your ping. >> There=E2=80=99s no guarantee any of these packets will not be = dropped anywhere >> on the network, so we can as well. >>=20 >> Just my 2ct >>=20 >> /bz >=20 > Mike > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Aug 18 12:04:04 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F763DDC5BF for ; Fri, 18 Aug 2017 12:04:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from oleg@lath.rinet.ru) Received: from lath.rinet.ru (lath.rinet.ru [195.54.192.90]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32F7383423 for ; Fri, 18 Aug 2017 12:04:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from oleg@lath.rinet.ru) Received: by lath.rinet.ru (Postfix, from userid 222) id 03D0B7FC; Fri, 18 Aug 2017 15:03:57 +0300 (MSK) Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2017 15:03:56 +0300 From: Oleg Bulyzhin To: Gopakumar Pillai Cc: "freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org" Subject: Re: Only last IP frag sent if ARP entry absent Message-ID: <20170818120356.GA58522@lath.RINET.ru> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="TB36FDmn/VVEgNH/" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.3 (2017-05-23) X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2017 12:04:04 -0000 --TB36FDmn/VVEgNH/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable $ sysctl net.link.ether.inet.maxhold net.link.ether.inet.maxhold: 1 $ sysctl -d net.link.ether.inet.maxhold net.link.ether.inet.maxhold: Number of packets to hold per ARP entry --=20 Oleg. =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D Oleg Bulyzhin -- OBUL-RIPN -- OBUL-RIPE -- oleg@rinet.ru =3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D --TB36FDmn/VVEgNH/ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEARYKAB0WIQRU3IiAS5hzxBjDaSalDfmDDe+xhwUCWZbXpwAKCRClDfmDDe+x h2DdAP9E8zr0eNNgjTmm9EPuP8y5p13X+v4urbra5GByd3TJWQEA8zvuYCpKGkes 5DrZoOiKJg/yrYW42hS4qKmxfsDqKAQ= =ROJy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --TB36FDmn/VVEgNH/-- From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Aug 18 20:31:19 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16E5BDD5023 for ; Fri, 18 Aug 2017 20:31:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0166574474 for ; Fri, 18 Aug 2017 20:31:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v7IKVImD071821 for ; Fri, 18 Aug 2017 20:31:18 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 217637] One TCP connection accepted TWO times Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2017 20:31:19 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.3-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-qa X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: freebsd@ruka.org X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: tuexen@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: mfc-stable10+ mfc-stable11+ X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2017 20:31:19 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D217637 --- Comment #95 from Richard Russo --- (In reply to Richard Russo from comment #91) I've tested the linked patch, manually applied to 10.3, setting syncookie o= nly mode (to trigger the condition), and the icmp limit tuned to a reasonable range, I was able to see the limiting kick in, as expected. This looks good= for us (and will be better when rate limits are individually adjustable!) --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sat Aug 19 09:01:04 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E56AADDB620 for ; Sat, 19 Aug 2017 09:01:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julian@freebsd.org) Received: from vps1.elischer.org (vps1.elischer.org [204.109.63.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "vps1.elischer.org", Issuer "CA Cert Signing Authority" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C9CA96C275 for ; Sat, 19 Aug 2017 09:01:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julian@freebsd.org) Received: from Julian-MBP3.local (106-68-135-200.dyn.iinet.net.au [106.68.135.200]) (authenticated bits=0) by vps1.elischer.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id v7J90skt076865 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Sat, 19 Aug 2017 02:00:59 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from julian@freebsd.org) Subject: Re: Only last IP frag sent if ARP entry absent To: Mike Karels , Gopakumar Pillai Cc: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" , "freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org" References: <43CC3432-DB42-4170-B3E7-E305561973F3@lists.zabbadoz.net> <9B1B1A12-CD9F-4A9F-B596-A2F6E5BAED1E@karels.net> From: Julian Elischer Message-ID: Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2017 17:00:48 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <9B1B1A12-CD9F-4A9F-B596-A2F6E5BAED1E@karels.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2017 09:01:05 -0000 On 18/8/17 11:33 am, Mike Karels wrote: > Another $.02 (inline): > > On 17 Aug 2017, at 18:39, Gopakumar Pillai wrote: > >> Thank You Bjoern. Could you please point me to the RFC? > > I don’t know if there is anything more recent than RFC1122 on this. > IIRC, it requires queuing at least one packet. Queing one packet is > what BSD has done essentially since ARP was implemented. This asks the question: One physical packet or one logical packet? Gopakumar's change effectively changes the queuing from one physical packet to the logical one. The next question becomes "how much extra work do we do to achieve this and does it affect anything else"? >> If this is not a MUST behavior in RFC, would my fix be good? I >> agree that this would affect only ICMP/UDP traffic. > > People have been asking for queuing of multiple packets for years. > That is a more general change. Consider another dumb application > that starts out by sending multiple UDP packets back-to-back. > However, well-designed application protocols don’t experience > problems like this. I’ll quickly note that ping isn’t an > application, but a network measuring tool. If you ask the question > “what happens if I start off a session with a single large packet > and I don’t support retransmission”, ping answers that question > correctly. > > If badly-designed protocols get bad performance, that doesn’t seem > like a bug to me, but a feature. > >> On 8/17/17, 2:40 PM, "Bjoern A. Zeeb" >> wrote: >> >> On 17 Aug 2017, at 21:16, Gopakumar Pillai wrote: >> >> > Hi FreeBSD Networking Gurus, >> > I came across an issue with an old version of FreeBSD and >> looking at >> > the latest FreeBSD code, seems it exists even now. I am >> assuming that >> > this issue is not reported. >> > >> > Observation: >> > When a ping was performed with larger payload than MTU, the >> first ping >> > failed when the ARP entry was absent for that IP. >> >> That is because ping/ICMP has no retransmit. >> >> >> > Noticed on the wire that the last IP fragment was sent for >> the first >> > request and then the subsequent requests were fine. >> > >> > Root Cause: >> > * ip_output fragments the packets and loops through the >> fragments to >> > send them to ether_output. >> > * ether_output does an arpresolve and if there is no >> existing ARP >> > entry it'll return EWOULDBLOCK after sending ARP Request. >> > * ether_output ignores the error and propagates success to >> ip_output >> > and it continues to send the remaining fragments. >> > * llentry keeps only one mbuf and the last fragment is >> retained when >> > the ARP Reply comes and the fragment is sent. >> >> Yes, according to the spec (RFC) we are supposed to throw the >> packet >> away entirely and simply report that to the next upper layer. >> However >> over the years people realised that this sucks for a TCP SYN >> packet with >> a retransmit timer and hence we store one of them. >> >> A large UDP packet would btw see the same behaviour to your ping. >> There’s no guarantee any of these packets will not be dropped >> anywhere >> on the network, so we can as well. >> >> Just my 2ct >> >> /bz > > Mike > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sat Aug 19 09:04:01 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EB8CDDBAFC for ; Sat, 19 Aug 2017 09:04:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julian@freebsd.org) Received: from vps1.elischer.org (vps1.elischer.org [204.109.63.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "vps1.elischer.org", Issuer "CA Cert Signing Authority" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 224C66C6ED for ; Sat, 19 Aug 2017 09:04:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julian@freebsd.org) Received: from Julian-MBP3.local (106-68-135-200.dyn.iinet.net.au [106.68.135.200]) (authenticated bits=0) by vps1.elischer.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id v7J93p4t076872 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Sat, 19 Aug 2017 02:03:57 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from julian@freebsd.org) Subject: Re: Only last IP frag sent if ARP entry absent To: Gopakumar Pillai , Mike Karels Cc: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" , "freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org" References: <43CC3432-DB42-4170-B3E7-E305561973F3@lists.zabbadoz.net> <9B1B1A12-CD9F-4A9F-B596-A2F6E5BAED1E@karels.net> From: Julian Elischer Message-ID: <23e6afd8-bdfd-1bd3-ff56-353a44e0d806@freebsd.org> Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2017 17:03:45 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2017 09:04:01 -0000 On 18/8/17 12:36 pm, Gopakumar Pillai wrote: > Thank You Bjoern and Mike. > > While I agree with you Mike that ping can fail, a UDP application could also be affected – if its sending >MTU data and if ARP entry is absent. And ether_output wouldn’t even tell the app if the sending failed or not (as per existing code). Agree that badly written applications would suffer the most. My fix only helps applications. > > I guess I am not totally out of line. > > But not sure whether I should checkin this fix or not! ☺ > > Thank You again. > > --Gopu > > > > From: Mike Karels > Date: Thursday, August 17, 2017 at 8:33 PM > To: Gopakumar Pillai > Cc: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" , "freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org" > Subject: Re: Only last IP frag sent if ARP entry absent > > > Another $.02 (inline): > > On 17 Aug 2017, at 18:39, Gopakumar Pillai wrote: > > Thank You Bjoern. Could you please point me to the RFC? > > I don’t know if there is anything more recent than RFC1122 on this. IIRC, it requires queuing at least one packet. Queing one packet is what BSD has done essentially since ARP was implemented. > > If this is not a MUST behavior in RFC, would my fix be good? I agree that this would affect only ICMP/UDP traffic. > > People have been asking for queuing of multiple packets for years. That is a more general change. Consider another dumb application that starts out by sending multiple UDP packets back-to-back. However, well-designed application protocols don’t experience problems like this. I’ll quickly note that ping isn’t an application, but a network measuring tool. If you ask the question “what happens if I start off a session with a single large packet and I don’t support retransmission”, ping answers that question correctly. > > If badly-designed protocols get bad performance, that doesn’t seem like a bug to me, but a feature. > > On 8/17/17, 2:40 PM, "Bjoern A. Zeeb" wrote: > > On 17 Aug 2017, at 21:16, Gopakumar Pillai wrote: > >> Hi FreeBSD Networking Gurus, >> I came across an issue with an old version of FreeBSD and looking at >> the latest FreeBSD code, seems it exists even now. I am assuming that >> this issue is not reported. >> >> Observation: >> When a ping was performed with larger payload than MTU, the first ping >> failed when the ARP entry was absent for that IP. > That is because ping/ICMP has no retransmit. > > >> Noticed on the wire that the last IP fragment was sent for the first >> request and then the subsequent requests were fine. >> >> Root Cause: >> * ip_output fragments the packets and loops through the fragments to >> send them to ether_output. >> * ether_output does an arpresolve and if there is no existing ARP >> entry it'll return EWOULDBLOCK after sending ARP Request. >> * ether_output ignores the error and propagates success to ip_output >> and it continues to send the remaining fragments. >> * llentry keeps only one mbuf and the last fragment is retained when >> the ARP Reply comes and the fragment is sent. > Yes, according to the spec (RFC) we are supposed to throw the packet > away entirely and simply report that to the next upper layer. However > over the years people realised that this sucks for a TCP SYN packet with > a retransmit timer and hence we store one of them. The canonical example of this was always NFS over UDP, where after sitting idle for a while, the first NFS packet would need to be retransmitted because the first part of the 8K NFS packet went AWOL. > > A large UDP packet would btw see the same behaviour to your ping. > There’s no guarantee any of these packets will not be dropped anywhere > on the network, so we can as well. > > Just my 2ct > > /bz > > Mike > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sat Aug 19 09:11:22 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 891D7DDC09A for ; Sat, 19 Aug 2017 09:11:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 76E036CA8C for ; Sat, 19 Aug 2017 09:11:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v7J9BK6w083994 for ; Sat, 19 Aug 2017 09:11:22 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 221418] FreeBSD 10.4-PRERELEASE fails to build on systems using 32 bit time_t since r322315. Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2017 09:11:21 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.3-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: patch X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: koobs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: tuexen@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: mfc-stable10+ X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: assigned_to flagtypes.name Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2017 09:11:22 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D221418 Kubilay Kocak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org |tuexen@freebsd.org Flags| |mfc-stable10+ --- Comment #4 from Kubilay Kocak --- Assign to committer that resolved, track MFH --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sat Aug 19 09:32:22 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E781BDDD412 for ; Sat, 19 Aug 2017 09:32:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D60366D4ED for ; Sat, 19 Aug 2017 09:32:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v7J9WMRB035771 for ; Sat, 19 Aug 2017 09:32:22 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 221439] ix ethernet doesn't link to switch if vlans are enabled. Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2017 09:32:22 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.1-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: IntelNetworking X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: wojtek@puchar.net X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2017 09:32:23 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D221439 --- Comment #6 from Wojciech Puchar --- switch is Extreme x450a-48T, latest firmware. port is set up to force gigab= it. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sat Aug 19 11:11:37 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B024DE2879 for ; Sat, 19 Aug 2017 11:11:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7916C7037D for ; Sat, 19 Aug 2017 11:11:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v7JBBY1V013117 for ; Sat, 19 Aug 2017 11:11:37 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 221439] ix ethernet doesn't link to switch if vlans are enabled. Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2017 11:11:34 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.1-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: IntelNetworking X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: smh@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2017 11:11:37 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D221439 Steven Hartland changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |smh@FreeBSD.org --- Comment #7 from Steven Hartland --- Forced speed often causes issues just set it to auto --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sat Aug 19 16:56:31 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C96FDD42EB for ; Sat, 19 Aug 2017 16:56:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike@karels.net) Received: from mail.karels.net (mail.karels.net [63.231.190.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5314811A8; Sat, 19 Aug 2017 16:56:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike@karels.net) Received: from [10.0.2.11] (mjk-mac2.karels.net [10.0.2.11]) by mail.karels.net (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v7JGuM0W091894; Sat, 19 Aug 2017 11:56:22 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from mike@karels.net) From: "Mike Karels" To: "Julian Elischer" Cc: "Gopakumar Pillai" , "Bjoern A. Zeeb" , "freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org" Subject: Re: Only last IP frag sent if ARP entry absent Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2017 11:56:12 -0500 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: <43CC3432-DB42-4170-B3E7-E305561973F3@lists.zabbadoz.net> <9B1B1A12-CD9F-4A9F-B596-A2F6E5BAED1E@karels.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed X-Mailer: MailMate (1.9.6r5347) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by mail.karels.net id v7JGuM0W091894 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2017 16:56:31 -0000 On 19 Aug 2017, at 4:00, Julian Elischer wrote: > On 18/8/17 11:33 am, Mike Karels wrote: >> Another $.02 (inline): >> >> On 17 Aug 2017, at 18:39, Gopakumar Pillai wrote: >> >>> Thank You Bjoern. Could you please point me to the RFC? >> >> I don=E2=80=99t know if there is anything more recent than RFC1122 on = this.=20 >> IIRC, it requires queuing at least one packet. Queing one packet is=20 >> what BSD has done essentially since ARP was implemented. > > This asks the question: One physical packet or one logical packet? > Gopakumar's change effectively changes the queuing from one physical=20 > packet to the logical one. > The next question becomes "how much extra work do we do to achieve=20 > this and does it affect anything else"? That isn=E2=80=99t the whole question. It=E2=80=99s one physical packet,= one=20 logical packet, or multiple frames? It makes more sense to me to support multiple frames rather than just=20 one logical packet. However, I don=E2=80=99t see a good reason to change from the current code. >>> If this is not a MUST behavior in RFC, would my fix be good? I agree=20 >>> that this would affect only ICMP/UDP traffic. >> >> People have been asking for queuing of multiple packets for years. =20 >> That is a more general change. Consider another dumb application=20 >> that starts out by sending multiple UDP packets back-to-back. =20 >> However, well-designed application protocols don=E2=80=99t experience=20 >> problems like this. I=E2=80=99ll quickly note that ping isn=E2=80=99t= an=20 >> application, but a network measuring tool. If you ask the question=20 >> =E2=80=9Cwhat happens if I start off a session with a single large pac= ket=20 >> and I don=E2=80=99t support retransmission=E2=80=9D, ping answers that= question=20 >> correctly. >> >> If badly-designed protocols get bad performance, that doesn=E2=80=99t = seem=20 >> like a bug to me, but a feature. >> >>> On 8/17/17, 2:40 PM, "Bjoern A. Zeeb"=20 >>> wrote: >>> >>> On 17 Aug 2017, at 21:16, Gopakumar Pillai wrote: >>> >>> > Hi FreeBSD Networking Gurus, >>> > I came across an issue with an old version of FreeBSD and=20 >>> looking at >>> > the latest FreeBSD code, seems it exists even now. I am=20 >>> assuming that >>> > this issue is not reported. >>> > >>> > Observation: >>> > When a ping was performed with larger payload than MTU, the=20 >>> first ping >>> > failed when the ARP entry was absent for that IP. >>> >>> That is because ping/ICMP has no retransmit. >>> >>> >>> > Noticed on the wire that the last IP fragment was sent for the=20 >>> first >>> > request and then the subsequent requests were fine. >>> > >>> > Root Cause: >>> > * ip_output fragments the packets and loops through the=20 >>> fragments to >>> > send them to ether_output. >>> > * ether_output does an arpresolve and if there is no=20 >>> existing ARP >>> > entry it'll return EWOULDBLOCK after sending ARP Request. >>> > * ether_output ignores the error and propagates success to=20 >>> ip_output >>> > and it continues to send the remaining fragments. >>> > * llentry keeps only one mbuf and the last fragment is=20 >>> retained when >>> > the ARP Reply comes and the fragment is sent. >>> >>> Yes, according to the spec (RFC) we are supposed to throw the=20 >>> packet >>> away entirely and simply report that to the next upper layer. =20 >>> However >>> over the years people realised that this sucks for a TCP SYN=20 >>> packet with >>> a retransmit timer and hence we store one of them. >>> >>> A large UDP packet would btw see the same behaviour to your=20 >>> ping. >>> There=E2=80=99s no guarantee any of these packets will not be dro= pped=20 >>> anywhere >>> on the network, so we can as well. >>> >>> Just my 2ct >>> >>> /bz >> >> Mike >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list >> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to=20 >> "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sat Aug 19 20:27:41 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E91E8DE24FD for ; Sat, 19 Aug 2017 20:27:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D7623636D0 for ; Sat, 19 Aug 2017 20:27:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v7JKRebr011363 for ; Sat, 19 Aug 2017 20:27:41 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 221497] Inconsistency in NETWORK group files rights for PPP Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2017 20:27:40 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: misc X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.1-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: jilles@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2017 20:27:42 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D221497 Jilles Tjoelker changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jilles@FreeBSD.org --- Comment #1 from Jilles Tjoelker --- This seems to be because the files you listed have special permissions for = the network group, while /etc/ppp and /etc/ppp/ppp.conf have the same permissio= ns for group wheel and others. Usually, the group of a system file is wheel un= less there is a reason such as permissions or setgid for it to have a different group. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sat Aug 19 21:43:58 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3674FDE70FF for ; Sat, 19 Aug 2017 21:43:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 24F4266415 for ; Sat, 19 Aug 2017 21:43:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v7JLhv2q037696 for ; Sat, 19 Aug 2017 21:43:58 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 221497] Inconsistency in NETWORK group files rights for PPP Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2017 21:43:58 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: misc X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.1-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: vermaden@interia.pl X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2017 21:43:58 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D221497 --- Comment #2 from vermaden@interia.pl --- All of the files I listed are ppp(8) related, so for me its lack of consist= ency that some of them have group 'network' and some of them have group 'wheel'. Maybe there is some 'bigger plan' for that setup, but from where I am stand= ing, I do not see it. Regards, vermaden --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sat Aug 19 22:13:14 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5BB8DE8B4E for ; Sat, 19 Aug 2017 22:13:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B43476719E for ; Sat, 19 Aug 2017 22:13:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v7JMDEGc028362 for ; Sat, 19 Aug 2017 22:13:14 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 221497] Inconsistency in NETWORK group files rights for PPP Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2017 22:13:15 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: misc X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.1-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: truckman@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2017 22:13:14 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D221497 Don Lewis changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |truckman@FreeBSD.org --- Comment #3 from Don Lewis --- /usr/sbin/ppp is in group network so that only users in group network can r= un it (it has not access permission for other). /var/run/ppp and /var/log/ppp.log are probably in group network so that only users in that group can look at them. They might contain sensitive information. These files don't give permission to other. The group ownership of /etc/ppp doesn't matter since it is mode 755. Anyone can ls that directory regardless of what groups they belong to since its contents are not sensitive. The group ownership of /etc/ppp/ppp.conf doesn't matter since its permissio= ns are 600. Nobody other than root can read it, no matter what its group migh= t be set to. Basically, group ownership only matters when the group perms !=3D other per= ms. One thing that is a bit strange is why /usr/sbin/ppp gives read access to other. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=