From owner-freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Wed Mar 22 15:18:26 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB23DD184C3 for ; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 15:18:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mgamsjager@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vk0-x22b.google.com (mail-vk0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A3AD0112D for ; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 15:18:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mgamsjager@gmail.com) Received: by mail-vk0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id j64so113271813vkg.3 for ; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 08:18:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:cc; bh=oddyXCzPDr3JwY0Hv2jqBSRvJiktKyva+wdyHmducUc=; b=MMmvJuRICU/+fBepEHcxzn5f/wk7i4PjJ867pnXr3fs8OGmPbBFsfawu1qMHeX4maW QPSiWe4XBX6GTO9SvE6mxwZaUUFcpA1dsSf7uSgWShrBfvTD6CJ9G5p2FgZK1FxLD2zg c7VXbYjf6dOuNbLINGnNerQSjU9Z1wE09lUoB0MIzNXKDDLzl1vyWWCWLcPwqarAlvS4 tOZ8N4IT0E2W1Gsn6joY0dBo3GJnUDEMvfhRaxHCDdbat8Jje3u5aWSOkGHQ+rEYitkq U+qvbfNdwID/D43c+oLbUYtlA6bGhLmXrnswJRpc1Qi9wbprNpjl7Vtpch5SE/jCtXCH wqeA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:cc; bh=oddyXCzPDr3JwY0Hv2jqBSRvJiktKyva+wdyHmducUc=; b=cbKKIwFfkAtuqxRSrlne6E68SPdVh3C7e7sc4qO1F4zGDmyJBguMvyfZaP6Pbt7H0t hSBfmushKtZC+O9h0SgG4Ln5DL/jwNO+r3Hcd20Ay60PfCGfNdH/KMjGpQrcigW7QxFP xVGGZEW2AvSDal45bvYRBpEVcnKiVcwwm3wREzeW3LFViSOC8ZlvcvbSwr8wtlenH75A 6rdn47VAF07RexLfSiZTTy2YlkmxivKC7/vK3TswSOhaVhakawqFRfCHebivDMEWN8bk CHXioPKa2QD6ssOV8oFr7gbFVTSD4X/Pippw+ZikQNc93pnynSbrxNlPbhwc9BYt0MTm rGnQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H1D0QmmA4T2M4rHTtmWVfIO/BZlW162MRFgNCtllJ7Lzon2WgztCRK2mJQrgElQYLh2jsuS70rL1Hb5NA== X-Received: by 10.176.74.198 with SMTP id t6mr15915202uae.4.1490195905553; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 08:18:25 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.159.35.78 with HTTP; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 08:17:55 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20170309202635.0ee8b0fd@thor.intern.walstatt.dynvpn.de> References: <58BE0984.4070208@quip.cz> <20170309202635.0ee8b0fd@thor.intern.walstatt.dynvpn.de> From: Matthias Gamsjager Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 16:17:55 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Network performance comparison of DragonflyBSD, FreeBSD and Linux Cc: "freebsd-performance@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance/tuning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 15:18:27 -0000 Maybe someone should retest and see where the problem. It doesn't help in saying the test sucks or is done wrong. On 9 March 2017 at 20:26, O. Hartmann wrote: > Am Tue, 7 Mar 2017 02:14:44 +0100 > Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> schrieb: > > > There is some comparison of DragonflyBSD, FreeBSD and two versions of > > Linux in specific network benchmark - HTTP/1.1 short lived connections. > > FreeBSD is the worst in this test. > > > > https://www.dragonflydigest.com/2017/03/06/19425.html > > > > https://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/~sephe/perfcomp/1K.png > > https://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/~sephe/perfcomp/8K.png > > https://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/~sephe/perfcomp/16K.png > > > > https://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/~sephe/perf_cmp.pdf > > > > Miroslav Lachman > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list > > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance- > unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > Thank you so much for this finding. > > It is interesting that with a generic kernel, the "performance" is roughl= y > the half of > what Linux and DFBSD would give. > > I miss performance benchmarks, it seems, that over the past couple of > years this habit > has become quite unusual for FreeBSD. > > Oliver > > -- > O. Hartmann > > Ich widerspreche der Nutzung oder =C3=9Cbermittlung meiner Daten f=C3=BCr > Werbezwecke oder f=C3=BCr die Markt- oder Meinungsforschung (=C2=A7 28 Ab= s. 4 BDSG). >