From owner-freebsd-pf@freebsd.org  Sun Dec  3 16:40:17 2017
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-pf@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-pf@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B707EDFF781
 for <freebsd-pf@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>; Sun,  3 Dec 2017 16:40:17 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from srs0=pdfk=c7=sigsegv.be=kristof@codepro.be)
Received: from venus.codepro.be (venus.codepro.be [IPv6:2a01:4f8:162:1127::2])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256
 bits))
 (Client CN "*.codepro.be", Issuer "Gandi Standard SSL CA 2" (verified OK))
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7FED97DAD6
 for <freebsd-pf@freebsd.org>; Sun,  3 Dec 2017 16:40:17 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from srs0=pdfk=c7=sigsegv.be=kristof@codepro.be)
Received: from [10.0.2.164]
 (ptr-8ripyygs3omapxtynip.18120a2.ip6.access.telenet.be
 [IPv6:2a02:1811:2419:4e02:9caa:8c46:a76c:1c91])
 (Authenticated sender: kp)
 by venus.codepro.be (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 91551426F0;
 Sun,  3 Dec 2017 17:40:14 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sigsegv.be; s=mail;
 t=1512319214; bh=4F+PNcnlXoF2eruT7SjR260q4RTFdXZQslXEe5KI0ng=;
 h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References;
 b=yMhNM9UofUf1Stoyqdo9b3vUrgu7bVkthyGXb1Vig4FWqNA58ZXKODQ2TSSqAmcc2
 ca8RrRlADE9/MjSxWB8pk/sVZJLzGryo61sNxvSq+kKVlWw/SHIuDcyx7iPPKwCUbO
 lOReVfm6XrSxBYPvJmTN182OJUoNCuVaZvSS5GQw=
From: "Kristof Provost" <kristof@sigsegv.be>
To: "John Jasen" <jjasen@gmail.com>
Cc: "FreeBSD PF" <freebsd-pf@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: problems with tftp-proxy in 11.1?
Date: Sun, 03 Dec 2017 17:40:13 +0100
X-Mailer: MailMate (2.0BETAr6099)
Message-ID: <F42958A5-F0F6-44CE-A290-E21A1BFD517B@sigsegv.be>
In-Reply-To: <e254d9bc-2246-648e-24b4-c5cd383b6f37@gmail.com>
References: <e254d9bc-2246-648e-24b4-c5cd383b6f37@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-BeenThere: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Technical discussion and general questions about packet filter
 \(pf\)" <freebsd-pf.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-pf>,
 <mailto:freebsd-pf-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-pf/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-pf@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-pf-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-pf>,
 <mailto:freebsd-pf-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Dec 2017 16:40:17 -0000

On 2 Dec 2017, at 4:56, John Jasen wrote:
> Attempts to run tftp-proxy across a freebsd system running pf result in
> very slow performance and an endless amount of:
>
> "pf connection lookup failed (no rdr?)"

> Is there something that has regressed in 11.1, or am I missing something?
>
I’m not aware of any such regressions, but that of course doesn’t mean the
can’t be there.

Can you post the relevant bits of your rules/configuration? A small test case
would be ideal.

Regards,
Kristof