From owner-freebsd-security@freebsd.org Thu Jan 26 21:48:11 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-security@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7A2BCC2BBC for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 21:48:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from oliver.pinter@hardenedbsd.org) Received: from mail-wm0-x233.google.com (mail-wm0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 57DBF3EF for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 21:48:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from oliver.pinter@hardenedbsd.org) Received: by mail-wm0-x233.google.com with SMTP id c85so91216313wmi.1 for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 13:48:11 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hardenedbsd-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=C/OI6GWiCKnF+Abo1diGGe5VkLvnSGNABSKlsugr8Io=; b=Oy3HIc7IRklLpROEyObsGPwPWXsWYj+eLgiMgEPKZCdNfWGGoOuu3sd7TtJmOuelZH IcMJuM9g9UlEZs1GbAtfSW6liTRFMix83C1+JhC9YCdTwGIJeLPXWxvbJJpcDBPzu9FR gNadBSzyhH5/8Z+zFplle9fg6AsZtDPy2tZQR+hrybE09ylndnpOwatcpk0D19yYkYsf TCcbwfp7+vguUQIcGKOd9whgEyr2CKYOJLbYUlxwdb/gU6eitnXICCx1/PVjgtDoBGPF i2Whcs7Nb1udCcVJ9dqUYWGmhZjttqtFp70eNv2/Gkw7GAYKZn0HfMOO3jZhVCZDy6F6 kdNg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=C/OI6GWiCKnF+Abo1diGGe5VkLvnSGNABSKlsugr8Io=; b=HM9tRuUrsxzsR6oNoPBGAcGy/zkeJ8lHPxVYo7BSG/FeU+D7BnuEpM8fI+wMgFKLrL DnhVgtYJzqclZYHT4VdpaIFzSZIn/igiK0/vwrM3ZvpPl/eJMXu54Zl6jR+pL5p2Yrt4 LVrYJaMTla4Mh0dB51K1XxGNV/ouovxSdzhd+2X2iNIqdREzY8ndJzhND3h8yudBssul dcKvhOn5rRNnlB1z8bctcwRdCHjmdW49Mc5eX9S7aMMS2HRWBIAlP8aYzOTDsmq6oORc T/+JDiCjKw1exTBLzTytzRTyXlzviBSVPKIcnGQ1EAO+EXGotoV5eZhtoB2SrxzwHyey QySw== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXLEYI6e94zPRqGDd20h45BpZsXzNjt+m+lWawnsbt/kOwGSZw9kdZ2tnKTDysyYv0i3IiAx/XwHwvs2Yncs X-Received: by 10.28.174.208 with SMTP id x199mr442192wme.107.1485467289504; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 13:48:09 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.194.51.42 with HTTP; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 13:48:08 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20170113041545.GS8460@kduck.kaduk.org> References: <0a30a1c7-e9d9-7d86-ee17-267e9fb47595@FreeBSD.org> <71C413FC-2417-453E-A075-49860F105A08@FreeBSD.org> <20170113041545.GS8460@kduck.kaduk.org> From: Oliver Pinter Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2017 22:48:08 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Plan for OpenSSL in stable/10? To: Benjamin Kaduk , Xin LI Cc: Dimitry Andric , freebsd-security@freebsd.org, Eric van Gyzen Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Security issues \[members-only posting\]" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2017 21:48:11 -0000 On 1/13/17, Benjamin Kaduk wrote: > On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 10:57:20PM +0100, Dimitry Andric wrote: >> On 12 Jan 2017, at 19:02, Eric van Gyzen wrote: >> > >> > Has anyone had time to discuss and form a plan for OpenSSL in >> > stable/10, >> > now that 1.0.1 is end-of-life? I don't recall seeing any public >> > discussion or announcement; forgive me if I missed it. >> >> Would updating to 1.0.2 change the API and/or ABI? > > IIRC upstream claims that it is ABI and API compatible, but they were less > good about enforcing that rigorously back then than they are now, so maybe > some things slipped through the cracks. > Is there any news regards to these questions? > -Ben > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >