From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Sun Jul 9 00:03:41 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9FA0DA55AB for ; Sun, 9 Jul 2017 00:03:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from meyer.sydney@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-wr0-x22d.google.com (mail-wr0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c0c::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 92E0470538 for ; Sun, 9 Jul 2017 00:03:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from meyer.sydney@googlemail.com) Received: by mail-wr0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id c11so92400690wrc.3 for ; Sat, 08 Jul 2017 17:03:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20161025; h=from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references :to:in-reply-to:message-id; bh=l9EXuO+f0/TnoLXvZaKknFnZ4ikKXqxlOfDCwZWSVVY=; b=Fd74aQNp+HvXItyVhX2uA+BIoPEiQ2csGF3cVZr08J4z6/8ND8GZP2OEftAeIPJy5J 5MeAKrFybN7iQ7oIQx0e80FcPsGp3DJ5wUHSDPUhh/qQgKafue2BoNqAMtgqxu/3JvLj LXZEoNmkve4owFP81J9MYyWjxjgdttUVPrxxODCsYSuhxoRI+TgDhhbQCGksRSfGEtEk 0BGrX4RDJF8JMEOJXRBNLDDBtDjiYMeb44uVctF0DL6Nj2nB/bDlSlaunn69UzL6hoiW WsWl1Z/xwRY5ScFGr8LLRKfs2bs/c355KqApxBjTT4d1+iTrpkdGTOk/lHkvOLxyHT/F wymg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :subject:date:references:to:in-reply-to:message-id; bh=l9EXuO+f0/TnoLXvZaKknFnZ4ikKXqxlOfDCwZWSVVY=; b=MjSossq4B0cKmjZwMpucc8MSPnLWyi96iUB0xdCCK9DxXwD15E+vHX0171mGVeGZOx hRfaDV8ui0kRptaV2JalBmCB6kCCIpKjj+ej7q83Zixf6jnjjryCNjPOenivmxUlHM9z FAkbNzWNjtVRTRTATV4FX5XyKdsD3Nitc8xEgTSo+IWDkmqOF1odeTwol70r0tZ5kK10 lGFCnVpOX9em031x9CBy1NRcSx46mADkjLueJoDrKjxHVuwZg56XPUU2tU+R4e2B7RX0 VfISiyWlPAe/ckzNU80yMYfQDVWyLZb1t0ZmNlrUMAdpY1vca6F/I6mkdljsDCB8QdEw 5LkQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw113d6Ft2HxGIahPmq+E17c25EhM+TnsnqzyYGAr7Wb+iormJ5DRV DA3UDeQ3foyfy1Ri85w= X-Received: by 10.80.196.79 with SMTP id w15mr6605777edf.124.1499558619632; Sat, 08 Jul 2017 17:03:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2a02:a03f:a53:ef01:e159:fee9:735f:d088? ([2a02:a03f:a53:ef01:e159:fee9:735f:d088]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id a20sm3986105edd.60.2017.07.08.17.03.38 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 08 Jul 2017 17:03:38 -0700 (PDT) From: Sydney Meyer Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\)) Subject: Re: VirtualBox outbound networking Date: Sun, 9 Jul 2017 02:03:36 +0200 References: <201707082233.v68MXZcM055411@mail.karels.net> <0FE43678-63BD-4A46-806B-8964580EE34F@googlemail.com> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Mike Karels In-Reply-To: <0FE43678-63BD-4A46-806B-8964580EE34F@googlemail.com> Message-Id: <0E9D3079-5900-4879-8A9C-837020BBB58F@googlemail.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Jul 2017 00:03:42 -0000 Mea Cupla, i guess.. I can confirm that both, NAT and bridged = networking, are indeed working fine on 11.1-RC1 too. The "problem" = appears to be "only" with ICMP and the way VirtualBox implements NAT, = i.e. TCP and UDP work fine. A post from last month stated bridged = networking on 11.1 BETA1 onwards wouldn't work either, that i can = confirm is working fine, at least here and as far as i can see. Mike, can your vbox guests send ICMP messages beyond their gateway on = 10.3 or is this known behaviour? Thanks again.. Sydney > On 9. Jul 2017, at 00:57, Sydney Meyer = wrote: >=20 > Hi Mike, >=20 > yes, a (correct) default route is added and the guest can reach the = VirtualBox nat-gateway.. oddly enough, the VirtualBox DHCP server seems = to have passed the hosts resolv.conf and is able to dig dns responses = with my local-lan dns resolver, but can't ping it. >=20 > When a guest digs to my routers dns service, i can see the packets on = the router coming from hosts IP address, i.e. nat working, but when i = try to ping it the router, i can't see any packets, neither on the host = nor on the remote site.