Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2018 12:58:31 -0500 From: CL Moonriver <clmoonriver@equinedreams.art> To: Erich Dollansky <freebsd.ed.lists@sumeritec.com>, freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CoC does not help in benchmarks Message-ID: <88e6b96d-1f89-6774-09b8-83afcfc27a82@equinedreams.art> In-Reply-To: <20180714064429.36c6bc43.freebsd.ed.lists@sumeritec.com> References: <20180714064429.36c6bc43.freebsd.ed.lists@sumeritec.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Can you clarify what you mean? Performance benchmarks like that are, after all, often of limited value when it comes to why one might choose one OS over another. A lot of other things factor into the decision. Security, stability, consistency, ease of configuration and administration, etc. On 07/13/18 17:44, Erich Dollansky wrote: > Hi, > > here are the consequences of putting a CoC up high on the priority list: > > https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=windows-freebsd112-8linux&num=1 > > Focusing on software would have made FreeBSD do better. > > Erich > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-advocacy > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-advocacy-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?88e6b96d-1f89-6774-09b8-83afcfc27a82>