Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 11 Mar 2018 02:57:56 +0100
From:      Emmanuel Vadot <manu@bidouilliste.com>
To:        Luc Hondareyte <hondareyte.luc@laposte.net>
Cc:        Luc Hondareyte via freebsd-arm <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: cpufreq support on Allwinner H3
Message-ID:  <20180311025756.bbddd0616bc61d78f66093a5@bidouilliste.com>
In-Reply-To: <542a7663-b4e0-2093-4dfc-9b8e9c3b513b@laposte.net>
References:  <5332936b-f38b-ca7a-03d9-dfc7c92e2727@laposte.net> <20180308061806.d9c9c7282d1a956d86b6bb22@bidouilliste.com> <542a7663-b4e0-2093-4dfc-9b8e9c3b513b@laposte.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 8 Mar 2018 12:33:44 +0100
Luc Hondareyte <hondareyte.luc@laposte.net> wrote:

> Le 08/03/2018 =E0 06:18, Emmanuel Vadot a =E9crit=A0:
> > On Tue, 6 Mar 2018 20:59:37 +0100
> > Luc Hondareyte via freebsd-arm <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I've just build 12-current for Allwinner H3=A0 (armv7) and it seems th=
at
> >> cpufreq support is missing (orangepi or nanopi):
> >   There is no opp table (freq<->voltage table) in the DTS that's why
> > it's not working.
> This thread?=20
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2018-February/55794=
0.html=20

 Yep exactly.

> >   I think I've seen patches on the linux-arm kernel mailing list to add
> > them but even with thoses we will need support for the v2 opp.
> v2 opp? Does it mean that, as a workaround, with the appropriate DTS=20
> patch and a switch back to armv6, this should work?

 Switch back to armv6 will change nothing but a patched dtb will do the
job. That what we had before and that's why on ganbold@ images cpufreq
works.
 Since I don't want patched DTB in the tree our only option is to
implement v2 opp table in sys/dev/cpufreq/cpufreq_dt.c and wait that
the dts is updated upstream.

> I say that because,=20
> on nanopi neo, with the "old" 12-current image build by Ganbold=20
> Tsagaankhuu (that was available on FriendlyArm Wiki), cpu_freq support=20
> is OK and it?s run at full speed:
>=20
> root@allwinner-h3:~ # uname -a
> FreeBSD allwinner-h3 12.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 12.0-CURRENT #7 r308116M: Mon=20
> Oct 31 10:56:20 ULAT 2016=20
> tsgan@beastie.mstride.com:/usr/obj/arm.armv6/usr/src/sys/GENERIC arm
> root@allwinner-h3:~ # sysctl dev.cpu.0.freq
> cpufreq: get returning known freq 1008
> cpufreq: get returning known freq 1008
> dev.cpu.0.freq: 1008
>=20
> And this image does not seem to use Linux DTS.
> >> root@allwinner-h3:~ # service powerd onestart
> >> Starting powerd.
> >> powerd: no cpufreq(4) support -- aborting: No such file or directory
> >> /etc/rc.d/powerd: WARNING: failed to start powerd
> >>
> >> So, on nanopi neo, it's slowdown (not on orange-pi that seems to run at
> >> full speed). I am using a custom kernel conf that just contains:
> >>
> >> include GENERIC
> >> nooptions=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 INVARIANTS
> >> nooptions=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 INVARIANT_SUPPORT
> >> nooptions=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 WITNESS
> >> nooptions=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 WITNESS_SKIPSPIN
> >> nooptions=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 BUF_TRACKING
> >> nooptions=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 DEADLKRES
> >> nooptions=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 FULL_BUF_TRACKING
> >>
> >   You can use the GENERIC-NODEBUG for that
> >
> Oh, I missed that. Thanks.


--=20
Emmanuel Vadot <manu@bidouilliste.com> <manu@freebsd.org>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20180311025756.bbddd0616bc61d78f66093a5>