From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sun Oct 7 09:26:07 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6333A10BA1B5 for ; Sun, 7 Oct 2018 09:26:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from soth.netfence.it (net-2-44-121-52.cust.vodafonedsl.it [2.44.121.52]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mailserver.netfence.it", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C86507C2AC for ; Sun, 7 Oct 2018 09:26:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from alamar.ventu (alamar.local.netfence.it [10.1.2.18]) (authenticated bits=0) by soth.netfence.it (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id w979PnXp004448 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Sun, 7 Oct 2018 11:25:55 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) X-Authentication-Warning: soth.netfence.it: Host alamar.local.netfence.it [10.1.2.18] claimed to be alamar.ventu Subject: Re: FCP-0101: Deprecating most 10/100 Ethernet drivers To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, imp@bsdimp.com References: <20181003210516.GA71565@spindle.one-eyed-alien.net> <20181004084411.GA50348@FreeBSD.org> From: Andrea Venturoli Message-ID: <6ff05cab-24a1-d18a-df21-6c51a5c33b3e@netfence.it> Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2018 11:25:48 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Oct 2018 09:26:07 -0000 On 10/4/18 3:07 PM, Warner Losh wrote: > At the root of this problem is the community's long resistance to having > data reported back to the project data about the machines running FreeBSD. > Absent any real and significant data, the only way to know if things are > unused is to ask. We cannot have the act of merely asking cause people to > freak out and hurl expletives all over the place. That's significantly not > cool. First off, I absolutely don't want to flame: I'm glad you asked and I was happy to answer. Just out of curiosity, don't we have sysutils/bsdstats (which I install on all the boxes I manage, but I understand won't be present in most embedded systems)? Is that project such a failure? If so, should it be better promoted or would it be pointless? bye & Thanks av.