From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sun Oct 21 01:24:32 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CA1FFFE356 for ; Sun, 21 Oct 2018 01:24:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A2367407A for ; Sun, 21 Oct 2018 01:24:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id F3004FFE353; Sun, 21 Oct 2018 01:24:31 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1C2FFFE352 for ; Sun, 21 Oct 2018 01:24:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F94F74078 for ; Sun, 21 Oct 2018 01:24:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB9B21E2FF for ; Sun, 21 Oct 2018 01:24:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w9L1OUYv035185 for ; Sun, 21 Oct 2018 01:24:30 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id w9L1OUeI035182 for net@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 21 Oct 2018 01:24:30 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 227654] [panic] repeatable crash with lagg+vlan+em Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2018 01:24:30 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.1-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: crash X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: eugen@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2018 01:24:32 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D227654 --- Comment #5 from Eugene Grosbein --- I've added additional printf's to sys/net/if_ethersubr.c and found that it panices within ether_output_frame() function. I've added this just before PFIL_HOOKED(&V_link_pfil_hook) check: if (ifp->if_index =3D=3D 6) printf(""ether_output_frame: checking curvnet= =3D%p\n", curvnet); if (ifp->if_index =3D=3D 6) printf(""ether_output_frame: V_link_pfil_hook= =3D%p\n", V_link_pfil_hook); And last lines of dmesg buffer after panic are: ether_output_frame: checking curvnet=3D0 panic: vm_fault_hold: fault on nofault entry, addr: 0 So, curvnet is NULL here, hence the panic. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sun Oct 21 01:30:22 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 472E3FFE56B for ; Sun, 21 Oct 2018 01:30:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D06857416A for ; Sun, 21 Oct 2018 01:30:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 9514DFFE569; Sun, 21 Oct 2018 01:30:21 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83CC5FFE568 for ; Sun, 21 Oct 2018 01:30:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1132974169 for ; Sun, 21 Oct 2018 01:30:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 65A1F1E305 for ; Sun, 21 Oct 2018 01:30:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w9L1UKb8041122 for ; Sun, 21 Oct 2018 01:30:20 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id w9L1UKBO041121 for net@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 21 Oct 2018 01:30:20 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 227654] [panic] repeatable crash with lagg+vlan+em Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2018 01:30:20 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.1-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: crash X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: eugen@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2018 01:30:22 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D227654 Eugene Grosbein changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |net@FreeBSD.org --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sun Oct 21 01:30:51 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 104F8FFE6DA for ; Sun, 21 Oct 2018 01:30:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2698741B5 for ; Sun, 21 Oct 2018 01:30:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 67508FFE6D7; Sun, 21 Oct 2018 01:30:50 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5612DFFE6D6 for ; Sun, 21 Oct 2018 01:30:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ECD4B741B0 for ; Sun, 21 Oct 2018 01:30:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46EE11E405 for ; Sun, 21 Oct 2018 01:30:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w9L1Una5045732 for ; Sun, 21 Oct 2018 01:30:49 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id w9L1Un2V045730 for net@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 21 Oct 2018 01:30:49 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 227654] [panic] repeatable crash with lagg+vlan+em Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2018 01:30:49 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: crash X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: eugen@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: version Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2018 01:30:51 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D227654 Eugene Grosbein changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|11.1-STABLE |CURRENT --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sun Oct 21 03:32:35 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 397B41037101 for ; Sun, 21 Oct 2018 03:32:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C06E378EF4 for ; Sun, 21 Oct 2018 03:32:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 855D610370FE; Sun, 21 Oct 2018 03:32:34 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7414710370FD for ; Sun, 21 Oct 2018 03:32:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 15FDB78EF0 for ; Sun, 21 Oct 2018 03:32:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 648121F4FC for ; Sun, 21 Oct 2018 03:32:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w9L3WXjY010996 for ; Sun, 21 Oct 2018 03:32:33 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id w9L3WXf7010995 for net@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 21 Oct 2018 03:32:33 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 227654] [panic] repeatable crash with lagg+vlan+em Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2018 03:32:33 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: crash X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: koobs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_severity cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2018 03:32:35 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D227654 Kubilay Kocak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|Affects Only Me |Affects Some People CC|stable@FreeBSD.org | --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sun Oct 21 06:20:00 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F2AEFD70C5 for ; Sun, 21 Oct 2018 06:20:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD1687DA70 for ; Sun, 21 Oct 2018 06:19:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 7289CFD70BB; Sun, 21 Oct 2018 06:19:59 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 612D4FD70BA for ; Sun, 21 Oct 2018 06:19:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F40DD7DA6E for ; Sun, 21 Oct 2018 06:19:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F07D20AD2 for ; Sun, 21 Oct 2018 06:19:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w9L6JwWL080519 for ; Sun, 21 Oct 2018 06:19:58 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id w9L6Jwqr080511 for net@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 21 Oct 2018 06:19:58 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 227654] [panic] repeatable crash with lagg+vlan+em Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2018 06:19:58 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: crash X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: kp@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2018 06:20:00 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D227654 Kristof Provost changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kp@freebsd.org --- Comment #6 from Kristof Provost --- This should fix it: diff --git a/sys/net/if_vlan.c b/sys/net/if_vlan.c index b75a62c16b3..79ef2422600 100644 --- a/sys/net/if_vlan.c +++ b/sys/net/if_vlan.c @@ -1302,8 +1302,13 @@ vlan_lladdr_fn(void *arg, int pending __unused) ifv =3D (struct ifvlan *)arg; ifp =3D ifv->ifv_ifp; + + CURVNET_SET(ifp->if_vnet); + /* The ifv_ifp already has the lladdr copied in. */ if_setlladdr(ifp, IF_LLADDR(ifp), ifp->if_addrlen); + + CURVNET_RESTORE(); } static int --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sun Oct 21 08:54:26 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21BF1FE567C for ; Sun, 21 Oct 2018 08:54:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B351883091 for ; Sun, 21 Oct 2018 08:54:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 78DA0FE5677; Sun, 21 Oct 2018 08:54:25 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67D44FE5674 for ; Sun, 21 Oct 2018 08:54:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 098B48308F for ; Sun, 21 Oct 2018 08:54:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 52590220A4 for ; Sun, 21 Oct 2018 08:54:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w9L8sO8O027676 for ; Sun, 21 Oct 2018 08:54:24 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id w9L8sOId027675 for net@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 21 Oct 2018 08:54:24 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 227654] [panic] repeatable crash with lagg+vlan+em Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2018 08:54:24 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: crash X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: eugen@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2018 08:54:26 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D227654 Eugene Grosbein changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|New |In Progress --- Comment #7 from Eugene Grosbein --- (In reply to Kristof Provost from comment #6) Yes, it help. Thanks! Please commit. Do you want to perform a merge to stable/12 before release, too? --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sun Oct 21 16:52:10 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 847E5FFA608 for ; Sun, 21 Oct 2018 16:52:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FC3197616 for ; Sun, 21 Oct 2018 16:52:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id D7827FFA5FF; Sun, 21 Oct 2018 16:52:09 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5FFEFFA5FA for ; Sun, 21 Oct 2018 16:52:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2261397602 for ; Sun, 21 Oct 2018 16:52:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 83BEF2629F for ; Sun, 21 Oct 2018 16:52:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w9LGq7pN067102 for ; Sun, 21 Oct 2018 16:52:07 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from bugzilla@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id w9LGq7P4067101 for net@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 21 Oct 2018 16:52:07 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: bugzilla set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 227654] [panic] repeatable crash with lagg+vlan+em Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2018 16:52:07 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: crash X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: commit-hook@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2018 16:52:10 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D227654 --- Comment #8 from commit-hook@freebsd.org --- A commit references this bug: Author: kp Date: Sun Oct 21 16:51:36 UTC 2018 New revision: 339547 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/339547 Log: vlan: Fix panic with lagg and vlan vlan_lladdr_fn() is called from taskqueue, which means there's no vnet context set. We can end up trying to send ARP messages (through the iflladdr_event event), which requires a vnet context. PR: 227654 MFC after: 3 days Changes: head/sys/net/if_vlan.c --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sun Oct 21 16:53:04 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82DF1FFA766 for ; Sun, 21 Oct 2018 16:53:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0214F97991 for ; Sun, 21 Oct 2018 16:53:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id B9D9CFFA761; Sun, 21 Oct 2018 16:53:03 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7D5BFFA760 for ; Sun, 21 Oct 2018 16:53:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4800B97985 for ; Sun, 21 Oct 2018 16:53:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A3765262B4 for ; Sun, 21 Oct 2018 16:53:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w9LGr20t070934 for ; Sun, 21 Oct 2018 16:53:02 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id w9LGr2KT070932 for net@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 21 Oct 2018 16:53:02 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 227654] [panic] repeatable crash with lagg+vlan+em Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2018 16:53:02 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: crash X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: kp@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2018 16:53:04 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D227654 --- Comment #9 from Kristof Provost --- (In reply to commit-hook from comment #7) I'll pick this up with re@ when it's gone through the 3 day MFC period. It might make it before the BETA2 builds start. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sun Oct 21 21:00:49 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78EA310088B8 for ; Sun, 21 Oct 2018 21:00:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39CCB77A03 for ; Sun, 21 Oct 2018 21:00:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id F106910088B4; Sun, 21 Oct 2018 21:00:48 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE6DD10088B1 for ; Sun, 21 Oct 2018 21:00:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E1B6779FA for ; Sun, 21 Oct 2018 21:00:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B7D284C6 for ; Sun, 21 Oct 2018 21:00:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w9LL0lAJ089259 for ; Sun, 21 Oct 2018 21:00:47 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from bugzilla@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id w9LL0lSx089248 for net@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 21 Oct 2018 21:00:47 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201810212100.w9LL0lSx089248@kenobi.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: bugzilla set sender to bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: Problem reports for net@FreeBSD.org that need special attention Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2018 21:00:47 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2018 21:00:49 -0000 To view an individual PR, use: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=(Bug Id). The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users, which need special attention. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and obsolete releases. Status | Bug Id | Description ------------+-----------+--------------------------------------------------- In Progress | 221146 | [ixgbe] Problem with second laggport In Progress | 231416 | dhcp / dhclient: bad udp checksums if running on New | 204438 | setsockopt() handling of kern.ipc.maxsockbuf limi New | 205592 | TCP processing in IPSec causes kernel panic New | 213410 | [carp] service netif restart causes hang only whe Open | 165622 | [ndis][panic][patch] Unregistered use of FPU in k Open | 193452 | Dell PowerEdge 210 II -- Kernel panic bce (broadc Open | 202510 | [CARP] advertisements sourced from CARP IP cause Open | 222273 | igb(4): Kernel panic (fatal trap 12) due to netwo Open | 227720 | Kernel panic in ppp server 10 problems total for which you should take action. From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sun Oct 21 22:24:22 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 878C3103854C for ; Sun, 21 Oct 2018 22:24:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24C8D7B269 for ; Sun, 21 Oct 2018 22:24:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id DD5F71038545; Sun, 21 Oct 2018 22:24:21 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC1211038544 for ; Sun, 21 Oct 2018 22:24:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6109E7B265 for ; Sun, 21 Oct 2018 22:24:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC57211DC for ; Sun, 21 Oct 2018 22:24:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w9LMOKUV093063 for ; Sun, 21 Oct 2018 22:24:20 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id w9LMOKwv093062 for net@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 21 Oct 2018 22:24:20 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 195102] dummynet_send() may panic the kernel (bad switch -256) Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2018 22:24:20 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 8.4-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: eugen@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Resolution: DUPLICATE X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: eugen@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: assigned_to resolution cc bug_status Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2018 22:24:22 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D195102 Eugene Grosbein changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|net@FreeBSD.org |eugen@freebsd.org Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE CC| |eugen@freebsd.org Status|New |Closed --- Comment #3 from Eugene Grosbein --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 220078 *** --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sun Oct 21 22:24:22 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D37BD1038552 for ; Sun, 21 Oct 2018 22:24:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 709337B26E for ; Sun, 21 Oct 2018 22:24:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 3223E103854A; Sun, 21 Oct 2018 22:24:22 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20EA11038546 for ; Sun, 21 Oct 2018 22:24:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B51097B266 for ; Sun, 21 Oct 2018 22:24:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DFDA211DD for ; Sun, 21 Oct 2018 22:24:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w9LMOKHj093068 for ; Sun, 21 Oct 2018 22:24:20 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id w9LMOKFl093067 for net@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 21 Oct 2018 22:24:20 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 220078] [patch] [panic] repeatable kernel panic due to unlocked INADDR_TO_IFP usage Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2018 22:24:20 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: patch X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: eugen@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: eugen@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: mfc-stable11+ X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2018 22:24:23 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D220078 Eugene Grosbein changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ports@grosbein.net --- Comment #25 from Eugene Grosbein --- *** Bug 195102 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Mon Oct 22 02:57:29 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88653FD9B5A for ; Mon, 22 Oct 2018 02:57:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2474083F80 for ; Mon, 22 Oct 2018 02:57:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id DAD86FD9B58; Mon, 22 Oct 2018 02:57:28 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9C11FD9B57 for ; Mon, 22 Oct 2018 02:57:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B21D83F70 for ; Mon, 22 Oct 2018 02:57:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B2DCE388E for ; Mon, 22 Oct 2018 02:57:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w9M2vRVe095740 for ; Mon, 22 Oct 2018 02:57:27 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id w9M2vRmm095739 for net@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 22 Oct 2018 02:57:27 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 227654] Reproducible crash with lagg+vlan+em Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2018 02:57:27 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: crash X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: koobs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: kp@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: mfc-stable11? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: flagtypes.name assigned_to cc short_desc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2018 02:57:29 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D227654 Kubilay Kocak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |mfc-stable11? Assignee|net@FreeBSD.org |kp@freebsd.org CC| |re@FreeBSD.org Summary|[panic] repeatable crash |Reproducible crash with |with lagg+vlan+em |lagg+vlan+em --- Comment #10 from Kubilay Kocak --- I'll create a mfc-stable12 flag to use shortly --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Mon Oct 22 03:00:14 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 966ECFD9E0E for ; Mon, 22 Oct 2018 03:00:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FB4B841D3 for ; Mon, 22 Oct 2018 03:00:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id E5FFDFD9E0B; Mon, 22 Oct 2018 03:00:13 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4F58FD9E0A for ; Mon, 22 Oct 2018 03:00:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 765E5841C2 for ; Mon, 22 Oct 2018 03:00:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD98D389A for ; Mon, 22 Oct 2018 03:00:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w9M30Cda002022 for ; Mon, 22 Oct 2018 03:00:12 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id w9M30CkS002021 for net@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 22 Oct 2018 03:00:12 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 227654] Reproducible crash with lagg+vlan+em Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2018 03:00:12 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: crash X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: koobs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: kp@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: mfc-stable11? mfc-stable12? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: flagtypes.name Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2018 03:00:14 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D227654 Kubilay Kocak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |mfc-stable12? --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Mon Oct 22 07:49:00 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B4EFFED55B for ; Mon, 22 Oct 2018 07:49:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from evidence@nitrology.com) Received: from nitrology.com (nitrology.com [69.28.128.160]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B1DF8D098; Mon, 22 Oct 2018 07:49:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from evidence@nitrology.com) Received: by nitrology.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 484525D458; Mon, 22 Oct 2018 00:48:53 -0700 (MST) Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2018 00:48:53 -0700 From: Jason Wolfe To: Lev Serebryakov Cc: Eugene Grosbein , freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What is best TCP throughput benchmarking tool? Message-ID: <20181022074853.GA31987@nitrology.com> References: <650aa1c7-26db-f463-cb59-8dfe1886c764@grosbein.net> <1743704969.20181019235034@serebryakov.spb.ru> <04f00191-78b8-6c9f-4b6b-fb11d10f91ea@grosbein.net> <876446461.20181020020328@serebryakov.spb.ru> <78b23b34-7c47-30a1-4386-405ec90fa76d@grosbein.net> <926143031.20181020175438@serebryakov.spb.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <926143031.20181020175438@serebryakov.spb.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2018 07:49:00 -0000 Lev Serebryakov wrote on Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 05:54:38PM +0300: > Hello Eugene, > > Saturday, October 20, 2018, 2:23:29 AM, you wrote: > > > You do not need to micro-control this. The wrk provides you with nice stats > > plus you have counters of "systat -ifstat 1" during long test. > > >> All these tools ? wrk, nginx ? are optimized for many concurrent > >> connections on powerful hardware and looks like overkill to test one > >> connection bandwidth on Atom CPU. > > You can choose number of concurrent connections yourself while running wrk. > One. I need one :-) > > >> BTW, how to configure nginx to server 16G+ file without any disk access? > >> One big hole on tmpfs? :) > > You do not need large disk file in case of wrk+nginx. Make small-sized tmpfs > > with single several megabytes-sized file, and that's all. > I want to run multi-minute streams. On gigabit network. Without any time > spent on connections, requests, TCP windows scaling, etc. As I said, it is > complete opposite to what nginx+wrk does well. nginx will happily serve sparse files: # touch internets.bff; time truncate -s 30T internets.bff; ls -ls # internets.bff real 0m0.001s user 0m0.000s sys 0m0.000s 224 -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 32985348833280 Oct 22 00:37 internets.bff HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK Length: 32985348833280 (30T) [application/octet-stream] Jason From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Mon Oct 22 16:08:46 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7E151036D67 for ; Mon, 22 Oct 2018 16:08:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 653F081E4D for ; Mon, 22 Oct 2018 16:08:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 2A3141036D64; Mon, 22 Oct 2018 16:08:45 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 085C41036D63 for ; Mon, 22 Oct 2018 16:08:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E77581E4A for ; Mon, 22 Oct 2018 16:08:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 09731A6EC for ; Mon, 22 Oct 2018 16:08:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w9MG8hb6060100 for ; Mon, 22 Oct 2018 16:08:43 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id w9MG8hll060099 for net@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 22 Oct 2018 16:08:43 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 231859] ipoib datagram mode: unicast packets are received as multicast packets Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2018 16:08:43 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.2-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: bmueller@panasas.com X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: hselasky@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2018 16:08:46 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D231859 --- Comment #4 from Brian Mueller --- I was OOTO last week. I will try 11-STABLE this week. The peer is a RHEL 7.2 node. [root@pgh-ibquad-1d ~]# modinfo ib_ipoib filename:=20=20=20=20=20=20 /lib/modules/3.10.0-327.22.2.el7.x86_64/weak-updates/mlnx-ofa_kernel/driver= s/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ib_ipoib.ko version: 3.2-2.0.0_25 Feb 2016 license: Dual BSD/GPL description: IP-over-InfiniBand net driver author: Roland Dreier alias: rtnl-link-ipoib rhelversion: 7.2 srcversion: EFF8E020E6E534613C6CEAA depends: ib_core,ib_cm,mlx_compat,ib_sa vermagic: 3.10.0-327.el7.x86_64 SMP mod_unload modversions=20 signer: Mellanox Technologies signing key sig_key: 61:FE:B0:74:FC:72:92:F9:58:41:93:86:FF:DD:9D:5C:A9:99:E4:03 sig_hashalgo: sha256 parm: max_nonsrq_conn_qp:Max number of connected-mode QPs per interface (applied only if shared receive queue is not available) (default: 128) (2-4096) (int) parm: mcast_debug_level:Enable multicast debug tracing if > 0 (default: 0) (int) parm: send_queue_size:Number of descriptors in send queue (defaul= t =3D 512) (2-8192) (int) parm: recv_queue_size:Number of descriptors in receive queue (def= ault =3D 512) (2-8192) (int) parm: lro:Enable LRO (Large Receive Offload) (default =3D 1) (0-1) (int) parm: lro_max_aggr:LRO: Max packets to be aggregated must be powe= r of 2(default =3D 64) (2-64) (int) parm: debug_level:Enable debug tracing if > 0 (default: 0) (0-1) (int) GIDS ----- * RHEL 7.2 client cat /sys/class/infiniband/mlx4_0/ports/1/gids/0 fe80:0000:0000:0000:0030:48ff:fff4:c6ed cat /sys/class/infiniband/mlx4_0/ports/1/gids/1 fe80:0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:0000 ... cat /sys/class/infiniband/mlx4_0/ports/1/gids/127 fe80:0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:0000 * FreeBSD 11.2 client sys.class.infiniband.mlx4_0.ports.1.gids.0: 80:0000:0000:0000:001e:6703:00f2:576f sys.class.infiniband.mlx4_0.ports.1.gids.1: fe80:0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:0000 ... sys.class.infiniband.mlx4_0.ports.1.gids.127: fe80:0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:0000 ibv_devinfo ------------ * RHEL 7.2 client hca_id: mlx4_0 transport: InfiniBand (0) fw_ver: 2.9.1000 node_guid: 0030:48ff:fff4:c6ec sys_image_guid: 0030:48ff:fff4:c6ef vendor_id: 0x02c9 vendor_part_id: 26428 hw_ver: 0xB0 board_id: SM_2092000001000 phys_port_cnt: 1 Device ports: port: 1 state: PORT_ACTIVE (4) max_mtu: 4096 (5) active_mtu: 4096 (5) sm_lid: 1 port_lid: 15 port_lmc: 0x00 link_layer: InfiniBand * FreeBSD 11.2 client hca_id: mlx4_0 transport: InfiniBand (0) fw_ver: 2.40.7000 node_guid: 001e:6703:00f2:576e sys_image_guid: 001e:6703:00f2:5771 vendor_id: 0x02c9 vendor_part_id: 4099 hw_ver: 0x0 board_id: INCX-3I355920151 phys_port_cnt: 1 port: 1 state: PORT_ACTIVE (4) max_mtu: 4096 (5) active_mtu: 4096 (5) sm_lid: 1 port_lid: 2 port_lmc: 0x00 link_layer: InfiniBand --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Mon Oct 22 17:19:03 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72DE5104D24E for ; Mon, 22 Oct 2018 17:19:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10611865D1 for ; Mon, 22 Oct 2018 17:19:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id C97DB104D24D; Mon, 22 Oct 2018 17:19:02 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B851D104D24C for ; Mon, 22 Oct 2018 17:19:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 59B59865CF for ; Mon, 22 Oct 2018 17:19:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A0F79B0B0 for ; Mon, 22 Oct 2018 17:19:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w9MHJ1oB029780 for ; Mon, 22 Oct 2018 17:19:01 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id w9MHJ1Kk029779 for net@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 22 Oct 2018 17:19:01 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 195102] dummynet_send() may panic the kernel (bad switch -256) Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2018 17:19:01 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 8.4-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: rgrimes@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Resolution: DUPLICATE X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: eugen@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2018 17:19:03 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D195102 Rodney W. Grimes changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |net@FreeBSD.org --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Mon Oct 22 23:57:36 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79C9DFE9AEA for ; Mon, 22 Oct 2018 23:57:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B17E7A78F for ; Mon, 22 Oct 2018 23:57:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id C3EEDFE9AE9; Mon, 22 Oct 2018 23:57:35 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2852FE9AE7 for ; Mon, 22 Oct 2018 23:57:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47A677A78E for ; Mon, 22 Oct 2018 23:57:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 93F0FE995 for ; Mon, 22 Oct 2018 23:57:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w9MNvYOA088925 for ; Mon, 22 Oct 2018 23:57:34 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id w9MNvYv9088924 for net@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 22 Oct 2018 23:57:34 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 223552] setting ":sticky" option to cloned_interfaces, errors occurred when invoke a "netif start". Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2018 23:57:34 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: bin X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.1-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: patch X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: hashiz@meridiani.jp X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2018 23:57:36 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D223552 --- Comment #1 from hashiz@meridiani.jp --- Does anyone watch this report? --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Oct 23 06:22:16 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85E671038FC8 for ; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 06:22:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 061E48BEBC for ; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 06:22:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id AE7411038FC6; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 06:22:15 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9765B1038FC5 for ; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 06:22:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C6BA8BEBA for ; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 06:22:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3179311FCE for ; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 06:22:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w9N6ME1T087433 for ; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 06:22:14 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id w9N6MEth087425 for net@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 06:22:14 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 232554] iprowifi2100: broken tx fix [patch] Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2018 06:22:13 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: patch, regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: linimon@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: keywords assigned_to cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2018 06:22:16 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D232554 Mark Linimon changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |patch, regression Assignee|bugs@FreeBSD.org |net@FreeBSD.org CC| |glebius@FreeBSD.org --- Comment #1 from Mark Linimon --- Cc: glebius@ as the committer of r287197 (equivalent to the github commit below) --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Oct 23 09:16:27 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 311C01072120 for ; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 09:16:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C241C71CEF for ; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 09:16:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 87B4B107211E; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 09:16:26 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7689A107211D for ; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 09:16:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 17C0071CEE for ; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 09:16:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 67160137DB for ; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 09:16:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w9N9GPuC068065 for ; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 09:16:25 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id w9N9GPhj068051 for net@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 09:16:25 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 223552] setting ":sticky" option to cloned_interfaces, errors occurred when invoke a "netif start". Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2018 09:16:25 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: bin X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.1-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: patch X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: eugen@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: hrs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: assigned_to cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2018 09:16:27 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D223552 Eugene Grosbein changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|net@FreeBSD.org |hrs@FreeBSD.org CC| |eugen@freebsd.org, | |net@FreeBSD.org --- Comment #2 from Eugene Grosbein --- Assign to the author of sticky interface feature. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Oct 23 12:45:33 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFFFAFD694D for ; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 12:45:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D5657A268 for ; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 12:45:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 421F2FD694C; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 12:45:33 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30D2FFD694B for ; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 12:45:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C72507A266 for ; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 12:45:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 212081550B for ; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 12:45:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w9NCjWjG053819 for ; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 12:45:32 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id w9NCjVBD053813 for net@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 12:45:31 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 232554] iprowifi2100: broken tx fix [patch] Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2018 12:45:32 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: patch, regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: glebius@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2018 12:45:34 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D232554 --- Comment #2 from Gleb Smirnoff --- Before my commit the logic was the same. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Oct 23 12:47:06 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58EE7FD69DB for ; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 12:47:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA6D47A306 for ; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 12:47:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id AEF84FD69DA; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 12:47:05 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DD5CFD69D9 for ; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 12:47:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 403AF7A304 for ; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 12:47:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9ED311550F for ; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 12:47:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w9NCl4om080175 for ; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 12:47:04 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id w9NCl47b080172 for net@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 12:47:04 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 232554] iprowifi2100: broken tx fix [patch] Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2018 12:47:04 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: patch, regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: glebius@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2018 12:47:06 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D232554 --- Comment #3 from Gleb Smirnoff --- Sorry, of course I reverted the logic. Will fix. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Oct 23 12:53:32 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21087FD6DC5 for ; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 12:53:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B31797AA3D for ; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 12:53:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 7798DFD6DC4; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 12:53:31 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6600FFD6DC3 for ; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 12:53:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 081AB7AA3B for ; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 12:53:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5674B15665 for ; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 12:53:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w9NCrUxL089752 for ; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 12:53:30 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id w9NCrUsJ089747 for net@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 12:53:30 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 232554] iprowifi2100: broken tx fix [patch] Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2018 12:53:30 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: patch, regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: glebius@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2018 12:53:32 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D232554 Gleb Smirnoff changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|New |In Progress --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Oct 23 12:54:13 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C455FD6E0A for ; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 12:54:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09C3F7AAEF for ; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 12:54:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id C2BB5FD6E09; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 12:54:12 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1626FD6E08 for ; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 12:54:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 53A827AAEC for ; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 12:54:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A229E15669 for ; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 12:54:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w9NCsBbO090398 for ; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 12:54:11 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from bugzilla@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id w9NCsBcs090397 for net@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 12:54:11 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: bugzilla set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 232554] iprowifi2100: broken tx fix [patch] Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2018 12:54:11 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: patch, regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: commit-hook@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2018 12:54:13 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D232554 --- Comment #4 from commit-hook@freebsd.org --- A commit references this bug: Author: glebius Date: Tue Oct 23 12:53:09 UTC 2018 New revision: 339643 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/339643 Log: Fix ipw_start(), where logic was reverted in r287197. PR: 232554 Submitted by: gl00my@mail.ru Changes: head/sys/dev/ipw/if_ipw.c --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Oct 23 21:34:23 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB36CFFD841; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 21:34:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from land.berklix.org (land.berklix.org [144.76.10.75]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "land.berklix.org", Issuer "land.berklix.org" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 68400714AD; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 21:34:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from mart.js.berklix.net (p2E52CCDC.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [46.82.204.220]) (authenticated bits=0) by land.berklix.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id w9NLYBMr035171 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 23 Oct 2018 21:34:19 GMT (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (fire.js.berklix.net [192.168.91.41]) by mart.js.berklix.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id w9NLY5Fb036818; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 23:34:05 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fire.js.berklix.net (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id w9NLXZXh080416; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 23:33:47 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Message-Id: <201810232133.w9NLXZXh080416@fire.js.berklix.net> To: Warner Losh cc: Ian Lepore , FreeBSD Net , freebsd-fcp@freebsd.org, FreeBSD-STABLE Mailing List , michelle@sorbs.net, "freebsd-arch@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: FCP-0101: Deprecating most 10/100 Ethernet drivers From: "Julian H. Stacey" Organization: http://berklix.eu BSD Unix Linux Consultants, Munich Germany User-agent: EXMH on FreeBSD http://berklix.eu/free/ X-From: http://www.berklix.eu/~jhs/ In-reply-to: Your message "Thu, 04 Oct 2018 11:38:46 -0600." Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2018 23:33:35 +0200 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2018 21:34:23 -0000 > I'd also suggest that rl stands in stark contrast to the cs, wb, sn, smc, > sf, tl, tx and vr drivers, which nobody has mentioned in this thread, and > which I doubt are in use in any FreeBSD system of any age today. vr is used by my TV driver laptop: http://www.berklix.com/~jhs/hardware/laptops/novatech-8355/ vr0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 options=82808 ether 00:40:d0:5e:26:38 inet 192.168.91.65 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.91.255 media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) status: active Which currently runs 8.4-RELEASE & eg xrandr, but I'll upgrade soon when I also configure it to receive from a raspberry-pi TV VPN server. Cheers, Julian -- Julian Stacey, Computer Consultant, Systems Engineer, BSD Linux Unix, Munich. Brexit referendum stole 3,700,000 Brits votes abroad, inc. 700,000 in EU. Campaign lies, criminal funding, economy & pound down. Time for an honest ref. http://exitbrexit.uk https://www.peoples-vote.uk/petition https://eci.ec.europa.eu/002/public/#/initiative From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Oct 23 21:36:37 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D79FFFDA57 for ; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 21:36:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kk.mishr@patanjaliayurved.org) Received: from niipmm.tsu.ru (niipmm.tsu.ru [92.63.65.130]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC8677181B for ; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 21:36:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kk.mishr@patanjaliayurved.org) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by niipmm.tsu.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id 089CA5F87C2 for ; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 00:00:01 +0700 (+07) Received: from niipmm.tsu.ru ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (niipmm.tsu.ru [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id ChhRNlWZ_WJg for ; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0700 (+07) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by niipmm.tsu.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47F1E5FD566 for ; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 22:30:02 +0700 (+07) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at niipmm.tsu.ru Received: from niipmm.tsu.ru ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (niipmm.tsu.ru [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id I3qUR6FqhFdS for ; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 22:30:02 +0700 (+07) Received: from [192.3.205.21] (unknown [192.3.205.21]) by niipmm.tsu.ru (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8FDE76167D4 for ; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 20:15:44 +0700 (+07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re:Validate To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org From: "Admin" Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2018 06:15:37 -0700 Message-Id: <20181023131545.8FDE76167D4@niipmm.tsu.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Description: Mail message body X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2018 21:36:37 -0000 Dear freebsd-net@freebsd.org , = Your account has exceeded it quota limit as set by Administrator, and you m= ay not be able to send or receive new mails until you Re-Validate your free= bsd-net@freebsd.org account. = To Re-Validate freebsd-net@freebsd.org account, Please CLICK: Re-Validate f= reebsd-net@freebsd.org Account=20 From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Oct 23 21:55:58 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D103FFE6E6; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 21:55:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from land.berklix.org (land.berklix.org [144.76.10.75]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "land.berklix.org", Issuer "land.berklix.org" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD755727CC; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 21:55:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from mart.js.berklix.net (p2E52CCDC.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [46.82.204.220]) (authenticated bits=0) by land.berklix.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id w9NLtpBd035703 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 23 Oct 2018 21:55:56 GMT (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (fire.js.berklix.net [192.168.91.41]) by mart.js.berklix.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id w9NLtkOJ036954; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 23:55:46 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fire.js.berklix.net (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id w9NLtM4Y080783; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 23:55:40 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Message-Id: <201810232155.w9NLtM4Y080783@fire.js.berklix.net> To: Doug Hardie cc: Brooks Davis , freebsd-net@freebsd.org, freebsd-fcp@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FCP-0101: Deprecating most 10/100 Ethernet drivers From: "Julian H. Stacey" Organization: http://berklix.eu BSD Unix Linux Consultants, Munich Germany User-agent: EXMH on FreeBSD http://berklix.eu/free/ X-From: http://www.berklix.eu/~jhs/ In-reply-to: Your message "Thu, 04 Oct 2018 12:54:28 -0700." <15FCEA6B-C017-40C5-8193-8C7AA3F563CC@mail.sermon-archive.info> Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2018 23:55:22 +0200 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2018 21:55:58 -0000 Doug Hardie wrote: > I have a number of production servers that only have bge and I don't see that listed in either category. None of them are running FreeBSD 12 yet as it has not been released. Also there are some with rl. Those are add-on boards so they could be changed, but would require extensive effort as the machines are about a 4 hour drive from here and would require reconfiguration (an error prone process when you are tired). bge is also used by my main laptop with current Oct 15 18:33 /boot/kernel/kernel bge0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 options=c019b media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT ) Doug, I think bge must be safe as man 4 bge: "bge - Broadcom BCM57xx/BCM590x Gigabit/Fast Ethernet driver" & Brooks proposal was ... "a plan to deprecate most 10/100 Ethernet drivers" Cheers, Julian -- Julian Stacey, Computer Consultant, Systems Engineer, BSD Linux Unix, Munich. Brexit referendum stole 3,700,000 Brits votes abroad, inc. 700,000 in EU. Campaign lies, criminal funding, economy & pound down. Time for an honest ref. http://exitbrexit.uk https://www.peoples-vote.uk/petition https://eci.ec.europa.eu/002/public/#/initiative From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Oct 23 22:10:39 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7591EFFED72; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 22:10:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brooks@spindle.one-eyed-alien.net) Received: from spindle.one-eyed-alien.net (spindle.one-eyed-alien.net [199.48.129.229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E4E57301B; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 22:10:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brooks@spindle.one-eyed-alien.net) Received: by spindle.one-eyed-alien.net (Postfix, from userid 3001) id 7D74E3C475F; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 22:10:37 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2018 22:10:37 +0000 From: Brooks Davis To: "Julian H. Stacey" Cc: Warner Losh , FreeBSD-STABLE Mailing List , Ian Lepore , FreeBSD Net , michelle@sorbs.net, "freebsd-arch@freebsd.org" , freebsd-fcp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FCP-0101: Deprecating most 10/100 Ethernet drivers Message-ID: <20181023221037.GA14128@spindle.one-eyed-alien.net> References: <201810232133.w9NLXZXh080416@fire.js.berklix.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="lrZ03NoBR/3+SXJZ" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201810232133.w9NLXZXh080416@fire.js.berklix.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2018 22:10:39 -0000 --lrZ03NoBR/3+SXJZ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 11:33:35PM +0200, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > > I'd also suggest that rl stands in stark contrast to the cs, wb, sn, sm= c, > > sf, tl, tx and vr drivers, which nobody has mentioned in this thread, a= nd > > which I doubt are in use in any FreeBSD system of any age today. >=20 > vr is used by my TV driver laptop: > http://www.berklix.com/~jhs/hardware/laptops/novatech-8355/ > vr0: flags=3D8843 metric 0 mtu 15= 00 > options=3D82808 > ether 00:40:d0:5e:26:38 > inet 192.168.91.65 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.91.255 > media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) > status: active >=20 > Which currently runs 8.4-RELEASE & eg xrandr, but I'll upgrade soon > when I also configure it to receive from a raspberry-pi TV VPN server. The above was a typo. vr is on the the STAY list. -- Brooks --lrZ03NoBR/3+SXJZ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJbz5xcAAoJEKzQXbSebgfAZmgH/R214Fn1RLCeGjvi0YbYJqNV 0hO3MPfXkcH+9Jw70egbvCpbuKxnoMkzNBfiXjh7cDUHMapMpni2Av3e0X0vEm1Z 3M7TMa7nC+7oIHNNbu4zD1a9cwgQO1EnWBWPy/FiWAxpYHT32lzvpdT7PdaTcJCL Wjig4jk6qK4qQgo02z+PF1wOT2VVdXqBuZFx3HrzVsOd/QAVhYk5AhtLe/7yn3LZ mZA5e/6qqsLk1h+xMsT+I9gLA1idYXBgUzoMTLzU3OsjJhxLYWq9YGIStQPr/Tve 1avsoo+VAyNwXWhS5zYk1iW1rKeLq6M7T6m5ERvDVS0Uo0JInzAFEI3H+9mKk7Q= =Cq3G -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --lrZ03NoBR/3+SXJZ-- From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Oct 23 22:14:26 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5050FFF215; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 22:14:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from land.berklix.org (land.berklix.org [144.76.10.75]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "land.berklix.org", Issuer "land.berklix.org" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 607C8735C5; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 22:14:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from mart.js.berklix.net (p2E52CCDC.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [46.82.204.220]) (authenticated bits=0) by land.berklix.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id w9NMEIFA036300 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 23 Oct 2018 22:14:22 GMT (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (fire.js.berklix.net [192.168.91.41]) by mart.js.berklix.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id w9NMEDc2037173; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 00:14:13 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fire.js.berklix.net (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id w9NMDhCW081823; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 00:13:55 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Message-Id: <201810232213.w9NMDhCW081823@fire.js.berklix.net> To: Brooks Davis cc: Warner Losh , FreeBSD-STABLE Mailing List , Ian Lepore , FreeBSD Net , michelle@sorbs.net, "freebsd-arch@freebsd.org" , freebsd-fcp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FCP-0101: Deprecating most 10/100 Ethernet drivers From: "Julian H. Stacey" Organization: http://berklix.eu BSD Unix Linux Consultants, Munich Germany User-agent: EXMH on FreeBSD http://berklix.eu/free/ X-From: http://www.berklix.eu/~jhs/ In-reply-to: Your message "Tue, 23 Oct 2018 22:10:37 -0000." <20181023221037.GA14128@spindle.one-eyed-alien.net> Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 00:13:43 +0200 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2018 22:14:27 -0000 Hi, Reference: > From: Brooks Davis > Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2018 22:10:37 +0000 Brooks Davis wrote: > > --lrZ03NoBR/3+SXJZ > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > Content-Disposition: inline > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 11:33:35PM +0200, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > > > I'd also suggest that rl stands in stark contrast to the cs, wb, sn, sm= > c, > > > sf, tl, tx and vr drivers, which nobody has mentioned in this thread, a= > nd > > > which I doubt are in use in any FreeBSD system of any age today. > >=20 > > vr is used by my TV driver laptop: > > http://www.berklix.com/~jhs/hardware/laptops/novatech-8355/ > > vr0: flags=3D8843 metric 0 mtu 15= > 00 > > options=3D82808 > > ether 00:40:d0:5e:26:38 > > inet 192.168.91.65 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.91.255 > > media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX pause,txpause>) > > status: active > >=20 > > Which currently runs 8.4-RELEASE & eg xrandr, but I'll upgrade soon > > when I also configure it to receive from a raspberry-pi TV VPN server. > > The above was a typo. vr is on the the STAY list. Great, Thanks. Cheers, Julian -- Julian Stacey, Computer Consultant, Systems Engineer, BSD Linux Unix, Munich. Brexit referendum stole 3,700,000 Brits votes abroad, inc. 700,000 in EU. Campaign lies, criminal funding, economy & pound down. Time for an honest ref. http://exitbrexit.uk https://www.peoples-vote.uk/petition https://eci.ec.europa.eu/002/public/#/initiative From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Oct 23 23:06:52 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACB051008A08; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 23:06:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net) Received: from pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net (br1.CN84in.dnsmgr.net [69.59.192.140]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B236752B9; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 23:06:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net) Received: from pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id w9NN6nsO024522; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 16:06:49 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net) Received: (from freebsd-rwg@localhost) by pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id w9NN6mG8024521; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 16:06:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg) From: "Rodney W. Grimes" Message-Id: <201810232306.w9NN6mG8024521@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net> Subject: Re: FCP-0101: Deprecating most 10/100 Ethernet drivers In-Reply-To: <20181023221037.GA14128@spindle.one-eyed-alien.net> To: Brooks Davis Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2018 16:06:48 -0700 (PDT) CC: "Julian H. Stacey" , FreeBSD-STABLE Mailing List , Ian Lepore , FreeBSD Net , michelle@sorbs.net, "freebsd-arch@freebsd.org" , freebsd-fcp@freebsd.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL121h (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2018 23:06:52 -0000 > On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 11:33:35PM +0200, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > > > I'd also suggest that rl stands in stark contrast to the cs, wb, sn, smc, > > > sf, tl, tx and vr drivers, which nobody has mentioned in this thread, and > > > which I doubt are in use in any FreeBSD system of any age today. > > > > vr is used by my TV driver laptop: > > http://www.berklix.com/~jhs/hardware/laptops/novatech-8355/ > > vr0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 > > options=82808 > > ether 00:40:d0:5e:26:38 > > inet 192.168.91.65 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.91.255 > > media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) > > status: active > > > > Which currently runs 8.4-RELEASE & eg xrandr, but I'll upgrade soon > > when I also configure it to receive from a raspberry-pi TV VPN server. > > The above was a typo. vr is on the the STAY list. > > -- Brooks Brooks, Is there a public revised version of FCP-0101 that reflects the feedback which is what core is voting on? -- Rod Grimes rgrimes@freebsd.org From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Oct 23 23:10:00 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8E111008C6B for ; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 23:09:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wlosh@bsdimp.com) Received: from mail-vs1-xe30.google.com (mail-vs1-xe30.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::e30]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 832BF754C0 for ; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 23:09:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wlosh@bsdimp.com) Received: by mail-vs1-xe30.google.com with SMTP id e206so1998777vsd.0 for ; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 16:09:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bsdimp-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=ZpJHsI4M/7F1nqGYsIixOnRMHRX8ACltgTe71EUAE2o=; b=gKylTv6E0BrhVUtHLWKvpgUj9eQ9jocS3DPRFfCEjCogeiuCQ/FP6B20b8vQ01bhXh jO11jWdP5J2uVOxBiwY3dyMwaYvmGUmEqKVW42oxrQgOw6ymeTMsxOmwyQOVOxXEcq+N EWY0fSAXbAPiPEyZdvnzYhvZgq4FxP0D1MrQ/Upg2YmDAnWNbKbZGVs+IyPDX7NUfwJG 0Cadmw/GMho2xDW/t7JrVfSk0oYICwrPy46nkyObTguWJd8nKKXDBgKWa+YnEIpylTY9 WgMR8s8qk210KXbN/Re/5AYypMC5DW5zH3R+cUgrNxJvxlGeMif9GqfM0KKcbRzV9XvB vRrQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ZpJHsI4M/7F1nqGYsIixOnRMHRX8ACltgTe71EUAE2o=; b=Y0L9mUO8AMGkDpdS4otop97lrChsnb9EpRAD0ZvbpFCAKT40PbwlKUyQpYIGbYsJ10 yugGhTlv7yGmhB8ZdzFHDsp6moxQ4zjLDSCcbOwkna2yu2BU1l7MA6payEqSdaMkPCIY yLNbr3ql9JlfcfC7uK0ha5CN6OMkQPHq2IsFSSC1QvvkEgrb1g/XyGXN13eVVV01jXC3 O44b++EQ7DdHI8I1OTdoYyMCcWMHHa2YO1uFtyPCNGf7YMMDZRWCCkEn2ytLAD1sEOur GeguHFW9ZX3lPfTVF/4sa9EtkS7/Br4Fpdnj75nCt6GpU6K27oF5SDIftEH6erbUfP/o RgyQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AGRZ1gJId2qkeU8tAtVyWagBBCSz1TrVlm83sWIB+SVKPztIDUkbmk0o vJnq5zXm6pvKopCMFoL9GVz4g2o1TVMoVtIYybax/Q== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5dOo8geCkuGvJNx7df3RNHP5t85xsnNR3e97/+2ic+JcQC+0GStw45an2hLhtgy04qrXeQMpSMx/U9pBpfdvpE= X-Received: by 2002:a67:4dc7:: with SMTP id i68mr128662vsg.46.1540336198661; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 16:09:58 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20181023221037.GA14128@spindle.one-eyed-alien.net> <201810232306.w9NN6mG8024521@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net> In-Reply-To: <201810232306.w9NN6mG8024521@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net> From: Warner Losh Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2018 17:09:47 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: FCP-0101: Deprecating most 10/100 Ethernet drivers To: "Rodney W. Grimes" Cc: Brooks Davis , FreeBSD-STABLE Mailing List , Ian Lepore , FreeBSD Net , "Julian H. Stacey" , Michelle Sullivan , "freebsd-arch@freebsd.org" , freebsd-fcp@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2018 23:10:00 -0000 On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 5:07 PM Rodney W. Grimes < freebsd-rwg@pdx.rh.cn85.dnsmgr.net> wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 11:33:35PM +0200, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > > > > I'd also suggest that rl stands in stark contrast to the cs, wb, sn, > smc, > > > > sf, tl, tx and vr drivers, which nobody has mentioned in this > thread, and > > > > which I doubt are in use in any FreeBSD system of any age today. > > > > > > vr is used by my TV driver laptop: > > > http://www.berklix.com/~jhs/hardware/laptops/novatech-8355/ > > > vr0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu > 1500 > > > options=82808 > > > ether 00:40:d0:5e:26:38 > > > inet 192.168.91.65 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.91.255 > > > media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX > ) > > > status: active > > > > > > Which currently runs 8.4-RELEASE & eg xrandr, but I'll upgrade soon > > > when I also configure it to receive from a raspberry-pi TV VPN server. > > > > The above was a typo. vr is on the the STAY list. > > > > -- Brooks > Brooks, > Is there a public revised version of FCP-0101 that reflects the > feedback which is what core is voting on? > Its on github, just like it's been the whole time for anybody to see, submit pull requests against and track: https://github.com/freebsd/fcp/blob/master/fcp-0101.md Warner From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Oct 23 23:11:07 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18A141008DFE for ; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 23:11:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wlosh@bsdimp.com) Received: from mail-vk1-xa2c.google.com (mail-vk1-xa2c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::a2c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 99EFC75701 for ; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 23:11:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wlosh@bsdimp.com) Received: by mail-vk1-xa2c.google.com with SMTP id d141so787144vke.3 for ; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 16:11:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bsdimp-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=XTYvAUUeKAKgCsvrWbJ7+kLqOs8Fq1XBw7kIcWF3jEk=; b=BQBCq7TJWKtiiRHPc4i0DuHLCphru70IXgcEW+KqXtC+A7g3WfW6+jcgzE92dn3ki/ vohNgXgpgCKzNdZTw85DSw0FiTqKp+mo8oWeCnkZmsgY2Mt8mRV3loK+leuame2LB7H3 rX+j1UZpyO+7/8CBzPiCBWifbdp0UEL8+DbPnEfSTORBCBj4ihToMrp+kSaQ2dacKhFe fvhYwEnTEN9ApIGy0lTb3OgfQs81TWo6pJyS0GN3S7JLDuC1FKpAs6kAYVpqOtYHzwVb iMZdNl3x+0ub5vzfqlLxK+5t0yb/wUK+DwdSZEW8tz7lEy16QaYwA9jhQ0CJH0mA737D AoXw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=XTYvAUUeKAKgCsvrWbJ7+kLqOs8Fq1XBw7kIcWF3jEk=; b=g+MiN8ndv5fzyJhYoF58RDg4C6Ha7Mt55pD/8bell7biS6oBkEjMU4u5kJixZxYoza KYlBLKpaqxFqDv9MD4rTf3MOnRu7FV/ETWPmWUe7x+L5Ev7GN+frvllkL4y1dF2Iqztg w14a1uNxjFia2lEBFB8Pq05k7sS4Mck7Kc1/m3yBSxabL7xo1T8tisI1dHSqoQF1+IgN TILmRQy/BZUmDx5iN8FdzMvmzdAB4txw2s5kMlgwVreb6/nHmWnxcHq9EsDr8px8waCO lOhAiCYHXTRIIyIrYfVPx/HZNqgj+3dl13LqYy6CIqIwzGtLYoGEwWSnJLwHuAzJuWf5 V9gg== X-Gm-Message-State: AGRZ1gI5YNHSiySCRJXr/WxtNwMKQx6rHJWH/gca3x4v1GHVWv+cManT YJhk2n8/sNcAm/xyrf8Bn4yaIhccZg2P53qHw+AJDQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5fmkXu0yxS0QqOmkMLS/zBfhZ99AzjvjMCSYZy0FY32znG5ZHH3Aawnis+F22Q/dfkkXT0RYuxRr1WuTlorljg= X-Received: by 2002:a1f:d803:: with SMTP id p3mr122934vkg.9.1540336265884; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 16:11:05 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <15FCEA6B-C017-40C5-8193-8C7AA3F563CC@mail.sermon-archive.info> <201810232155.w9NLtM4Y080783@fire.js.berklix.net> In-Reply-To: <201810232155.w9NLtM4Y080783@fire.js.berklix.net> From: Warner Losh Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2018 17:10:54 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: FCP-0101: Deprecating most 10/100 Ethernet drivers To: "Julian H. Stacey" Cc: bc979@lafn.org, freebsd-fcp@freebsd.org, FreeBSD Net , Brooks Davis , FreeBSD-STABLE Mailing List , "freebsd-arch@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2018 23:11:07 -0000 On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 3:57 PM Julian H. Stacey wrote: > Doug Hardie wrote: > > I have a number of production servers that only have bge and I don't see > that listed in either category. None of them are running FreeBSD 12 yet as > it has not been released. Also there are some with rl. Those are add-on > boards so they could be changed, but would require extensive effort as the > machines are about a 4 hour drive from here and would require > reconfiguration (an error prone process when you are tired). > > bge is also used by my main laptop with current Oct 15 18:33 > /boot/kernel/kernel > > bge0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 > > options=c019b > media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT ) > > Doug, I think bge must be safe as man 4 bge: > "bge - Broadcom BCM57xx/BCM590x Gigabit/Fast Ethernet driver" > & Brooks proposal was ... "a plan to deprecate most 10/100 Ethernet > drivers" > Indeed. https://github.com/freebsd/fcp/blob/master/fcp-0101.md shows bge is not on the list to go. Warner From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Oct 23 23:11:33 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCA3C1008EDF; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 23:11:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brooks@spindle.one-eyed-alien.net) Received: from spindle.one-eyed-alien.net (spindle.one-eyed-alien.net [199.48.129.229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 27553757D0; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 23:11:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brooks@spindle.one-eyed-alien.net) Received: by spindle.one-eyed-alien.net (Postfix, from userid 3001) id 2F5453C475F; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 23:11:32 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2018 23:11:32 +0000 From: Brooks Davis To: "Rodney W. Grimes" Cc: Brooks Davis , "Julian H. Stacey" , FreeBSD-STABLE Mailing List , Ian Lepore , FreeBSD Net , michelle@sorbs.net, "freebsd-arch@freebsd.org" , freebsd-fcp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FCP-0101: Deprecating most 10/100 Ethernet drivers Message-ID: <20181023231132.GA14827@spindle.one-eyed-alien.net> References: <20181023221037.GA14128@spindle.one-eyed-alien.net> <201810232306.w9NN6mG8024521@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="DocE+STaALJfprDB" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201810232306.w9NN6mG8024521@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2018 23:11:34 -0000 --DocE+STaALJfprDB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 04:06:48PM -0700, Rodney W. Grimes wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 11:33:35PM +0200, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > > > > I'd also suggest that rl stands in stark contrast to the cs, wb, sn= , smc, > > > > sf, tl, tx and vr drivers, which nobody has mentioned in this threa= d, and > > > > which I doubt are in use in any FreeBSD system of any age today. > > >=20 > > > vr is used by my TV driver laptop: > > > http://www.berklix.com/~jhs/hardware/laptops/novatech-8355/ > > > vr0: flags=3D8843 metric 0 mt= u 1500 > > > options=3D82808 > > > ether 00:40:d0:5e:26:38 > > > inet 192.168.91.65 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.91.255 > > > media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) > > > status: active > > >=20 > > > Which currently runs 8.4-RELEASE & eg xrandr, but I'll upgrade soon > > > when I also configure it to receive from a raspberry-pi TV VPN server. > >=20 > > The above was a typo. vr is on the the STAY list. > >=20 > > -- Brooks > Brooks, > Is there a public revised version of FCP-0101 that reflects the > feedback which is what core is voting on? https://github.com/freebsd/fcp/blob/master/fcp-0101.md has been updated throughout the feedback process as drivers were moved to the STAY list, errors were found, etc. It also contains a summary of responses and the hard data we have. -- Brooks --DocE+STaALJfprDB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJbz6qjAAoJEKzQXbSebgfAUUEIAJTSlTLrA81440KDSciYlMbI mBLQbmu+un/RxKmYBklC8XCnHQRSTrtgIbONEL+HxjVUMAj3x9VWfIOy5NGF2nlA uEJa4NES0Yv1vgNobhNQm3ht5Z7Z1raKBVwGyqpL775x2ZX3ZQtn44MBCk/f7N6r iTtoyjKRGxKzOrZffNf1jsF+hdO1W4Y709Fw44/XxianK5vP6qaE9wP1PaaVhW6s XxrRI2TSHrJOC1raFKO6jDvRaBssGWSVhLIa+ErSiMIL3D8OwcgRY7gxNRhDGVb9 7NvIEcKHMQHqF9B1fqoPangqdRZBfF2PnHgK/uUy1FXsDXIyLj2J6jXCzp71P2s= =XG9T -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --DocE+STaALJfprDB-- From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Oct 23 23:26:50 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 422691036A8E; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 23:26:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net) Received: from pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net (br1.CN84in.dnsmgr.net [69.59.192.140]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 80B927678E; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 23:26:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net) Received: from pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id w9NNQjFQ024760; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 16:26:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net) Received: (from freebsd-rwg@localhost) by pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id w9NNQjtK024759; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 16:26:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg) From: "Rodney W. Grimes" Message-Id: <201810232326.w9NNQjtK024759@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net> Subject: Re: FCP-0101: Deprecating most 10/100 Ethernet drivers In-Reply-To: To: Warner Losh Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2018 16:26:45 -0700 (PDT) CC: Brooks Davis , FreeBSD-STABLE Mailing List , Ian Lepore , FreeBSD Net , "Julian H. Stacey" , Michelle Sullivan , "freebsd-arch@freebsd.org" , freebsd-fcp@freebsd.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL121h (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2018 23:26:50 -0000 > On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 5:07 PM Rodney W. Grimes < > freebsd-rwg@pdx.rh.cn85.dnsmgr.net> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 11:33:35PM +0200, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > > > > > I'd also suggest that rl stands in stark contrast to the cs, wb, sn, > > smc, > > > > > sf, tl, tx and vr drivers, which nobody has mentioned in this > > thread, and > > > > > which I doubt are in use in any FreeBSD system of any age today. > > > > > > > > vr is used by my TV driver laptop: > > > > http://www.berklix.com/~jhs/hardware/laptops/novatech-8355/ > > > > vr0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu > > 1500 > > > > options=82808 > > > > ether 00:40:d0:5e:26:38 > > > > inet 192.168.91.65 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.91.255 > > > > media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX > > ) > > > > status: active > > > > > > > > Which currently runs 8.4-RELEASE & eg xrandr, but I'll upgrade soon > > > > when I also configure it to receive from a raspberry-pi TV VPN server. > > > > > > The above was a typo. vr is on the the STAY list. > > > > > > -- Brooks > > Brooks, > > Is there a public revised version of FCP-0101 that reflects the > > feedback which is what core is voting on? > > > > Its on github, just like it's been the whole time for anybody to see, > submit pull requests against and track: I have no gh account, desires no gh account, so have no way to submit a change request other than through direct email to brooks or another gh user. This is fundementally flawed. > https://github.com/freebsd/fcp/blob/master/fcp-0101.md Thank you for the link, I had looked at it before MeetBSD, which did not have most of the recent changes done "a day ago". Isnt this document now in a frozen state while core reviews/votes? -- Rod Grimes rgrimes@freebsd.org From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Oct 24 00:03:02 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79F0B1037A30; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 00:03:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net) Received: from pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net (br1.CN84in.dnsmgr.net [69.59.192.140]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 00D42777FB; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 00:03:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net) Received: from pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id w9O02uxp025020; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 17:02:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net) Received: (from freebsd-rwg@localhost) by pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id w9O02tXg025019; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 17:02:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg) From: "Rodney W. Grimes" Message-Id: <201810240002.w9O02tXg025019@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net> Subject: Re: FCP-0101: Deprecating most 10/100 Ethernet drivers In-Reply-To: <20181023233716.GA15106@spindle.one-eyed-alien.net> To: Brooks Davis Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2018 17:02:55 -0700 (PDT) CC: Warner Losh , FreeBSD-STABLE Mailing List , Ian Lepore , FreeBSD Net , "Julian H. Stacey" , Michelle Sullivan , "freebsd-arch@freebsd.org" , freebsd-fcp@freebsd.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL121h (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 00:03:02 -0000 -- Start of PGP signed section. > On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 04:26:45PM -0700, Rodney W. Grimes wrote: > > > On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 5:07 PM Rodney W. Grimes < > > > freebsd-rwg@pdx.rh.cn85.dnsmgr.net> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 11:33:35PM +0200, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > > > > > > > I'd also suggest that rl stands in stark contrast to the cs, wb, sn, > > > > smc, > > > > > > > sf, tl, tx and vr drivers, which nobody has mentioned in this > > > > thread, and > > > > > > > which I doubt are in use in any FreeBSD system of any age today. > > > > > > > > > > > > vr is used by my TV driver laptop: > > > > > > http://www.berklix.com/~jhs/hardware/laptops/novatech-8355/ > > > > > > vr0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu > > > > 1500 > > > > > > options=82808 > > > > > > ether 00:40:d0:5e:26:38 > > > > > > inet 192.168.91.65 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.91.255 > > > > > > media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX > > > > ) > > > > > > status: active > > > > > > > > > > > > Which currently runs 8.4-RELEASE & eg xrandr, but I'll upgrade soon > > > > > > when I also configure it to receive from a raspberry-pi TV VPN server. > > > > > > > > > > The above was a typo. vr is on the the STAY list. > > > > > > > > > > -- Brooks > > > > Brooks, > > > > Is there a public revised version of FCP-0101 that reflects the > > > > feedback which is what core is voting on? > > > > > > > > > > Its on github, just like it's been the whole time for anybody to see, > > > submit pull requests against and track: > > > > I have no gh account, desires no gh account, so have no way to > > submit a change request other than through direct email to > > brooks or another gh user. This is fundementally flawed. > > > > > https://github.com/freebsd/fcp/blob/master/fcp-0101.md > > > > Thank you for the link, I had looked at it before MeetBSD, > > which did not have most of the recent changes done "a day ago". > > > > Isnt this document now in a frozen state while core reviews/votes? > > I sent it to a vote at c224c67557297d7cba909ad008542cb60980cc6b only > to notice a bug in table rendering. I submitted a pull request fix > that and a missing word which was merged since neither was material. I > suppose they could have waited or been skipped, but there's no value in > the FCP process being bound by the sort of pointless rigidity that led > to -DPOSIX_MISTAKE in every libc compile line. The FCP process itself is unclear on this point, I think this should be clarified. It is much more clear on post approval: Changes after acceptance FCPs may need revision after they have been moved into the accepted state. In such cases, the author SHOULD update the FCP to reflect the final conclusions. If the changes are major, the FCP SHOULD be withdrawn and restarted. -- Rod Grimes rgrimes@freebsd.org From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Oct 24 00:04:51 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87F441037CCC for ; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 00:04:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wlosh@bsdimp.com) Received: from mail-vk1-xa2a.google.com (mail-vk1-xa2a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::a2a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DEAFF77A33 for ; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 00:04:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wlosh@bsdimp.com) Received: by mail-vk1-xa2a.google.com with SMTP id m199-v6so807149vke.9 for ; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 17:04:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bsdimp-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=HL9+HPYGeQgvgzfdIkooQvpdti3UDljW1vYu7T7v8gg=; b=ZQEsVQyt/tBqmo9KSS9Qy5GxVbWyaGO14qcFSOa+toTgHeSdckI73cZvvmrLq/SRCt Yyx8UK+4KWMhlZCF7yCQAk8bjeH0rArU+UbAWZ86lL2uBRCMZvUGOlWeL1MdJGLPaEeW jVpVnFQOiiHrjgJSvypTNU9D4/+Lcp1j8/qr0tRomm/jls/9/tl2pzxHPnL7h3fzE5ew zyYq45NbNwUl0smaHwzzQOroJrsEBRzxKXmRT8aAC0oOJZy4mtHUmoEFVEMGiUxSlrG3 OUmZ+SSCiTqWDEpe0uMtPU7rx6LjZXw1vhL0MS78Om4z1GedOw++OmRhIRxYSsniFLef 1CJg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=HL9+HPYGeQgvgzfdIkooQvpdti3UDljW1vYu7T7v8gg=; b=VQK1cgBZEoC77M7+QBqZdiXOQzwSByu1X1DWsT8y/xC4ADTOA40X5uDOeG+HKBW7lf p/BFwpK6M47i5TLfqquaB4wLGPss7MW1dw5/15RPTkobPnZC/rnc0cLPzfvAl39BMvXW tdmTWFH48q7YH5AEOLBQluRPjijhed9wZJ2rgkWGszvUwadX2DnkxcB0tuFiQNqHPkXt IKYgk5g7CY/f+bHdFEP8kG3V13K5CtjOxXaHgn5672PFGNuRUZRnQFrbDsj+Hw+ejsGZ 9ky7g8Sy0rwuKIR1q09Dy4qUN8+gEr8MsfpHTHqZ6of843254VcmVsoAsR15ogiGwRds IH0g== X-Gm-Message-State: AGRZ1gLmI/TRjN4OSisQc5Fp0tHe3Ek3A8j4EnI8HEpdhcvWlkKwPBOl VbaYcrEQ7bpjMikQbR07dqCALIBiSHEdX9Objx3kRA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5fWey/EJ5M4YXEzYWaPf/lgUdOUEH6m4VIK15pRM/L89W3YDbPIGP+carkF0Toc5l81MbE7u3AYQyXve0MhxUw= X-Received: by 2002:a1f:9255:: with SMTP id u82mr166903vkd.85.1540339490149; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 17:04:50 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <201810232326.w9NNQjtK024759@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net> In-Reply-To: <201810232326.w9NNQjtK024759@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net> From: Warner Losh Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2018 18:04:38 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: FCP-0101: Deprecating most 10/100 Ethernet drivers To: "Rodney W. Grimes" Cc: Brooks Davis , FreeBSD-STABLE Mailing List , Ian Lepore , FreeBSD Net , "Julian H. Stacey" , Michelle Sullivan , "freebsd-arch@freebsd.org" , freebsd-fcp@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 00:04:51 -0000 On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 5:26 PM Rodney W. Grimes < freebsd-rwg@pdx.rh.cn85.dnsmgr.net> wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 5:07 PM Rodney W. Grimes < > > freebsd-rwg@pdx.rh.cn85.dnsmgr.net> wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 11:33:35PM +0200, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > > > > > > I'd also suggest that rl stands in stark contrast to the cs, wb, > sn, > > > smc, > > > > > > sf, tl, tx and vr drivers, which nobody has mentioned in this > > > thread, and > > > > > > which I doubt are in use in any FreeBSD system of any age today. > > > > > > > > > > vr is used by my TV driver laptop: > > > > > http://www.berklix.com/~jhs/hardware/laptops/novatech-8355/ > > > > > vr0: flags=8843 metric 0 > mtu > > > 1500 > > > > > options=82808 > > > > > ether 00:40:d0:5e:26:38 > > > > > inet 192.168.91.65 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast > 192.168.91.255 > > > > > media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX > > > ) > > > > > status: active > > > > > > > > > > Which currently runs 8.4-RELEASE & eg xrandr, but I'll upgrade soon > > > > > when I also configure it to receive from a raspberry-pi TV VPN > server. > > > > > > > > The above was a typo. vr is on the the STAY list. > > > > > > > > -- Brooks > > > Brooks, > > > Is there a public revised version of FCP-0101 that reflects the > > > feedback which is what core is voting on? > > > > > > > Its on github, just like it's been the whole time for anybody to see, > > submit pull requests against and track: > > I have no gh account, desires no gh account, so have no way to > submit a change request other than through direct email to > brooks or another gh user. This is fundementally flawed. > The fcp process was officially approved by core.9. You can make suggestions to core for improvements to the process. Lord knows this FCP hasn't been trouble free (though we've learned some valuable lessons). Submissions to the author is always an option should you choose not to use the widely used technology we've chosen to automate this process. Some FreeBSD users don't have accounts, however, many non-developers have github accounts and I think it's a reasonable way to do outreach to the larger community w/o requiring everybody to get a freebsd account (since they are already likely to have a github account, and if not they are trivial to get). So yea, it's a flawed process, and we'd love feedback on actionable items we can do to make it better. Warner From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Oct 23 23:37:17 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 884611036F78; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 23:37:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brooks@spindle.one-eyed-alien.net) Received: from spindle.one-eyed-alien.net (spindle.one-eyed-alien.net [199.48.129.229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2230676DC5; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 23:37:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brooks@spindle.one-eyed-alien.net) Received: by spindle.one-eyed-alien.net (Postfix, from userid 3001) id 3BA723C475F; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 23:37:16 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2018 23:37:16 +0000 From: Brooks Davis To: "Rodney W. Grimes" Cc: Warner Losh , Brooks Davis , FreeBSD-STABLE Mailing List , Ian Lepore , FreeBSD Net , "Julian H. Stacey" , Michelle Sullivan , "freebsd-arch@freebsd.org" , freebsd-fcp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FCP-0101: Deprecating most 10/100 Ethernet drivers Message-ID: <20181023233716.GA15106@spindle.one-eyed-alien.net> References: <201810232326.w9NNQjtK024759@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="VbJkn9YxBvnuCH5J" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201810232326.w9NNQjtK024759@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 00:19:14 +0000 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2018 23:37:17 -0000 --VbJkn9YxBvnuCH5J Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 04:26:45PM -0700, Rodney W. Grimes wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 5:07 PM Rodney W. Grimes < > > freebsd-rwg@pdx.rh.cn85.dnsmgr.net> wrote: > >=20 > > > > On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 11:33:35PM +0200, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > > > > > > I'd also suggest that rl stands in stark contrast to the cs, wb= , sn, > > > smc, > > > > > > sf, tl, tx and vr drivers, which nobody has mentioned in this > > > thread, and > > > > > > which I doubt are in use in any FreeBSD system of any age today. > > > > > > > > > > vr is used by my TV driver laptop: > > > > > http://www.berklix.com/~jhs/hardware/laptops/novatech-8355/ > > > > > vr0: flags=3D8843 metric = 0 mtu > > > 1500 > > > > > options=3D82808 > > > > > ether 00:40:d0:5e:26:38 > > > > > inet 192.168.91.65 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.9= 1.255 > > > > > media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX > > > ) > > > > > status: active > > > > > > > > > > Which currently runs 8.4-RELEASE & eg xrandr, but I'll upgrade so= on > > > > > when I also configure it to receive from a raspberry-pi TV VPN se= rver. > > > > > > > > The above was a typo. vr is on the the STAY list. > > > > > > > > -- Brooks > > > Brooks, > > > Is there a public revised version of FCP-0101 that reflects t= he > > > feedback which is what core is voting on? > > > > >=20 > > Its on github, just like it's been the whole time for anybody to see, > > submit pull requests against and track: >=20 > I have no gh account, desires no gh account, so have no way to > submit a change request other than through direct email to > brooks or another gh user. This is fundementally flawed. >=20 > > https://github.com/freebsd/fcp/blob/master/fcp-0101.md >=20 > Thank you for the link, I had looked at it before MeetBSD, > which did not have most of the recent changes done "a day ago". >=20 > Isnt this document now in a frozen state while core reviews/votes? I sent it to a vote at c224c67557297d7cba909ad008542cb60980cc6b only to notice a bug in table rendering. I submitted a pull request fix that and a missing word which was merged since neither was material. I suppose they could have waited or been skipped, but there's no value in the FCP process being bound by the sort of pointless rigidity that led to -DPOSIX_MISTAKE in every libc compile line. -- Brooks --VbJkn9YxBvnuCH5J Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJbz7CqAAoJEKzQXbSebgfAwOAH/0CWmIrkKsSqGjFGNeSFO7re C8i1rzIuZ4p589nhKWRfaIRC6h5FaAlBD6+/1PR3gsMwFebHVT8CcH34khy2voiJ 1TYDn6atuTqbJapp8pPH0xV56ZNr2iTMVwRU52jzGY9+gJU7uDqAcisI66U8Suqx S0tHsVZab+j4sNgCPTU5LnQ/+AYPUp5v5Gmgd4rlgYjZEA8F9YnMgtCv5c07tfdm ynN3l0DnTg3u2IQnExRh6OU9WTy/ggjBfQmcg7fCL9JAwrrkCukkyvXILmFmBuhn eShpFUzFR9rKAzYsJ92WSUviJLzB5DKDCYAUeXz0qozK9mAt75J5FYKUS/0hDBk= =dMkV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --VbJkn9YxBvnuCH5J-- From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Oct 24 00:24:07 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 615D3103929E for ; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 00:24:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wlosh@bsdimp.com) Received: from mail-vs1-xe36.google.com (mail-vs1-xe36.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::e36]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C5C02793A3 for ; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 00:24:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wlosh@bsdimp.com) Received: by mail-vs1-xe36.google.com with SMTP id y195so2069404vsc.7 for ; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 17:24:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bsdimp-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=SS4/vRIDN3nSI7h+BewXYbgGlXMEHgS4+tsxfZcZHQo=; b=wboELGjzXBDCycqu+LGI0xcQMEOa3yknBp3GRdgC4mu4wFuI5KmWw45JUU4yOuBN79 J4uniRe3obgZ9i/b2b6GLpa2EoLjAD2IPrblIGfC79Pyq+ixNRn0UCf2LC8Hcq/Yiu+n aWE57VypU60eqUkhGAArRHCJ1FKrnA5bOwmQb1o+FXBMmpgyVPb3ZqGDgdD6oQ6gODiR 7o9/iQqsLgJfhThy0bIGnFoTlUuYcqjIWe03BCEcCU5puPqifqkLs/aBeM81SBkO97jI 09Hr+Mz0urUL/Ei8NVnakGe/ySMM5hRYBDHXf+8cTcyN0g0ylfSx0JIXOxmErHr9O+Ow M3lQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=SS4/vRIDN3nSI7h+BewXYbgGlXMEHgS4+tsxfZcZHQo=; b=Oh4JBcLCXZ/bw92bebhiNyUtbJQooPxDCThwvITPrlJo6YJiMI7ogsoFg3k8ewG902 p5RrhlxYRPcwYix281RBxNzZExQW3vlJx0N24ILvqJChYGxlVZoIIfCyNeWmbU0m/MKp OUK06BJ3Ek0CmBNQ/jkQt37bQCLCWcyA/uQhIub7Nf0ec0hUt05uI+hb9JhGKa2Kx9Wr Ox3qaNKHGHazB3MsB4oYPEVpMX/KeWi70PYSyHspDB6KyF8nQszaP3Uklrou6i5y9BH+ IuHoBum9O1OxgAJXFoqVUwTKLnjew6VsdrrZAX9dJ5Y7dRvPZUs+Y4MCTqJkx8+zWpex QJOg== X-Gm-Message-State: AGRZ1gJHR5vaM5vFrkm/pI8aMqTGX84zqmVtdYxlx7aIUg3NLzTpg1xH yZjSgH84iAlE30d3nbZvWHAwwpb+g/lUaGqXZutRrw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5fSQRhJXab0fsNki2NiNyF3nK4ySn3P+mjTGaoINWRPvoURpNfTrzDMKbHdyIrJ+HKU9PkbVY6XT7Zn//wsmoo= X-Received: by 2002:a67:4988:: with SMTP id d8mr193821vsg.41.1540340645958; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 17:24:05 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20181023233716.GA15106@spindle.one-eyed-alien.net> <201810240002.w9O02tXg025019@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net> In-Reply-To: <201810240002.w9O02tXg025019@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net> From: Warner Losh Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2018 18:23:54 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: FCP-0101: Deprecating most 10/100 Ethernet drivers To: "Rodney W. Grimes" Cc: Brooks Davis , FreeBSD-STABLE Mailing List , Ian Lepore , FreeBSD Net , "Julian H. Stacey" , Michelle Sullivan , "freebsd-arch@freebsd.org" , freebsd-fcp@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 00:24:07 -0000 On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 6:02 PM Rodney W. Grimes < freebsd-rwg@pdx.rh.cn85.dnsmgr.net> wrote: > -- Start of PGP signed section. > > On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 04:26:45PM -0700, Rodney W. Grimes wrote: > > > > On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 5:07 PM Rodney W. Grimes < > > > > freebsd-rwg@pdx.rh.cn85.dnsmgr.net> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 11:33:35PM +0200, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > > > > > > > > I'd also suggest that rl stands in stark contrast to the cs, > wb, sn, > > > > > smc, > > > > > > > > sf, tl, tx and vr drivers, which nobody has mentioned in this > > > > > thread, and > > > > > > > > which I doubt are in use in any FreeBSD system of any age > today. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vr is used by my TV driver laptop: > > > > > > > http://www.berklix.com/~jhs/hardware/laptops/novatech-8355/ > > > > > > > vr0: flags=8843 metric > 0 mtu > > > > > 1500 > > > > > > > options=82808 > > > > > > > ether 00:40:d0:5e:26:38 > > > > > > > inet 192.168.91.65 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast > 192.168.91.255 > > > > > > > media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX > > > > > ) > > > > > > > status: active > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Which currently runs 8.4-RELEASE & eg xrandr, but I'll upgrade > soon > > > > > > > when I also configure it to receive from a raspberry-pi TV VPN > server. > > > > > > > > > > > > The above was a typo. vr is on the the STAY list. > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Brooks > > > > > Brooks, > > > > > Is there a public revised version of FCP-0101 that > reflects the > > > > > feedback which is what core is voting on? > > > > > > > > > > > > > Its on github, just like it's been the whole time for anybody to see, > > > > submit pull requests against and track: > > > > > > I have no gh account, desires no gh account, so have no way to > > > submit a change request other than through direct email to > > > brooks or another gh user. This is fundementally flawed. > > > > > > > https://github.com/freebsd/fcp/blob/master/fcp-0101.md > > > > > > Thank you for the link, I had looked at it before MeetBSD, > > > which did not have most of the recent changes done "a day ago". > > > > > > Isnt this document now in a frozen state while core reviews/votes? > > > > I sent it to a vote at c224c67557297d7cba909ad008542cb60980cc6b only > > to notice a bug in table rendering. I submitted a pull request fix > > that and a missing word which was merged since neither was material. I > > suppose they could have waited or been skipped, but there's no value in > > the FCP process being bound by the sort of pointless rigidity that led > > to -DPOSIX_MISTAKE in every libc compile line. > > The FCP process itself is unclear on this point, > I think this should be clarified. > > It is much more clear on post approval: > Changes after acceptance > > FCPs may need revision after they have been moved into the > accepted state. In such cases, the author SHOULD update the > FCP to reflect the final conclusions. > If the changes are major, the FCP SHOULD be withdrawn > and restarted. > Good point Rod. While common sense suggests that trivial changes during the voting should be allowed for editorial purposes (eg fix grammar mistakes, table rendering etc), it's better to spell that out so there's no confusion. diff --git a/fcp-0000.md b/fcp-0000.md index b4fe0f3..c8cc6f7 100644 --- a/fcp-0000.md +++ b/fcp-0000.md @@ -144,7 +144,10 @@ When the discussion of a change has come to a suitable and acceptable close it SHOULD be updated to the `vote` state. At this time the FreeBSD Core Team will vote on the subject of the FCP. The -result of vote moves the FCP into the `accepted` or `rejected` state. +result of vote moves the FCP into the `accepted` or `rejected` state. The +core team MAY make minor edits to the FCP to correct minor mistakes. Core +MAY return the proposal to the submitter if there are major problems that +need to be addressed. FCPs in the `accepted` state can be updated and corrected. See the "Changes after acceptance" section for more information. Normally I'd submit that as a pull request, but since I know you don't use github, I thought I'd present it here to see if this answers your concerns before doing so. Warner From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Oct 24 00:33:20 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 282EF1039921; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 00:33:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net) Received: from pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net (br1.CN84in.dnsmgr.net [69.59.192.140]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ABD9C79AA3; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 00:33:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net) Received: from pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id w9O0XFXN025274; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 17:33:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net) Received: (from freebsd-rwg@localhost) by pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id w9O0XEep025273; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 17:33:14 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg) From: "Rodney W. Grimes" Message-Id: <201810240033.w9O0XEep025273@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net> Subject: Re: FCP-0101: Deprecating most 10/100 Ethernet drivers In-Reply-To: To: Warner Losh Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2018 17:33:14 -0700 (PDT) CC: Brooks Davis , FreeBSD-STABLE Mailing List , Ian Lepore , FreeBSD Net , "Julian H. Stacey" , Michelle Sullivan , "freebsd-arch@freebsd.org" , freebsd-fcp@freebsd.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL121h (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 00:33:20 -0000 > On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 6:02 PM Rodney W. Grimes < > freebsd-rwg@pdx.rh.cn85.dnsmgr.net> wrote: ... deleted un relavent text ... > > > > > > Brooks, > > > > > > Is there a public revised version of FCP-0101 that > > reflects the > > > > > > feedback which is what core is voting on? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Its on github, just like it's been the whole time for anybody to see, > > > > > submit pull requests against and track: > > > > > > > > I have no gh account, desires no gh account, so have no way to > > > > submit a change request other than through direct email to > > > > brooks or another gh user. This is fundementally flawed. > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/freebsd/fcp/blob/master/fcp-0101.md > > > > > > > > Thank you for the link, I had looked at it before MeetBSD, > > > > which did not have most of the recent changes done "a day ago". > > > > > > > > Isnt this document now in a frozen state while core reviews/votes? > > > > > > I sent it to a vote at c224c67557297d7cba909ad008542cb60980cc6b only > > > to notice a bug in table rendering. I submitted a pull request fix > > > that and a missing word which was merged since neither was material. I > > > suppose they could have waited or been skipped, but there's no value in > > > the FCP process being bound by the sort of pointless rigidity that led > > > to -DPOSIX_MISTAKE in every libc compile line. > > > > The FCP process itself is unclear on this point, > > I think this should be clarified. > > > > It is much more clear on post approval: > > Changes after acceptance > > > > FCPs may need revision after they have been moved into the > > accepted state. In such cases, the author SHOULD update the > > FCP to reflect the final conclusions. > > If the changes are major, the FCP SHOULD be withdrawn > > and restarted. > > > > Good point Rod. While common sense suggests that trivial changes during the > voting should be allowed for editorial purposes (eg fix grammar mistakes, > table rendering etc), it's better to spell that out so there's no confusion. Agreed. > > diff --git a/fcp-0000.md b/fcp-0000.md > index b4fe0f3..c8cc6f7 100644 > --- a/fcp-0000.md > +++ b/fcp-0000.md > @@ -144,7 +144,10 @@ When the discussion of a change has come to a suitable > and acceptable close it > SHOULD be updated to the `vote` state. > > At this time the FreeBSD Core Team will vote on the subject of the FCP. The > -result of vote moves the FCP into the `accepted` or `rejected` state. > +result of vote moves the FCP into the `accepted` or `rejected` state. The > +core team MAY make minor edits to the FCP to correct minor mistakes. Core > +MAY return the proposal to the submitter if there are major problems that > +need to be addressed. This allows and clarifies that core may modify it, it does not address if the author/submitter can modify it. > > FCPs in the `accepted` state can be updated and corrected. > See the "Changes after acceptance" section for more information. > > Normally I'd submit that as a pull request, but since I know you don't use > github, I thought I'd present it here to see if this answers your concerns > before doing so. I thank you very much for that consideration, -- Rod Grimes rgrimes@freebsd.org From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Oct 24 03:00:51 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41FBB1071180 for ; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 03:00:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3C107D7EA for ; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 03:00:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 98559107117E; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 03:00:50 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87002107117D for ; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 03:00:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2924D7D7E4 for ; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 03:00:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F2FA1CB41 for ; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 03:00:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w9O30naC035570 for ; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 03:00:49 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id w9O30n1C035562 for net@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 03:00:49 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 232554] iprowifi2100: broken tx fix [patch] Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 03:00:48 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: patch, regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: koobs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: glebius@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc assigned_to Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 03:00:51 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D232554 Kubilay Kocak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |net@FreeBSD.org Assignee|net@FreeBSD.org |glebius@FreeBSD.org --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Oct 24 13:13:51 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22B8E107B23C for ; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 13:13:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from donotreplytothismail@gmx.com) Received: from SUNSTUDIO (li1865-135.members.linode.com [172.105.211.135]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 06C5589A9E for ; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 13:13:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from donotreplytothismail@gmx.com) Message-ID: <18A60785-EBF8-45A5-9AFC-75C914331544@SUNSTUDIO> From: "Mark Chen" (Mark Chen) To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Satellite Broadband Internet Modem IP freebsd-net@freebsd.org Date: 24 Oct 2018 20:05:59 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 13:13:51 -0000 From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Oct 24 13:05:21 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7129E1079D02; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 13:05:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net) Received: from pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net (br1.CN84in.dnsmgr.net [69.59.192.140]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B60286F1B; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 13:05:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net) Received: from pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id w9OCJakm027721; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 05:19:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net) Received: (from freebsd-rwg@localhost) by pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id w9OCJXTd027720; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 05:19:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg) From: "Rodney W. Grimes" Message-Id: <201810241219.w9OCJXTd027720@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net> Subject: Re: FCP-0101: Deprecating most 10/100 Ethernet drivers In-Reply-To: <9257C84A-CA7C-42B9-9AD8-89AE33C96356@gid.co.uk> To: Bob Bishop Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 05:19:33 -0700 (PDT) CC: Warner Losh , Brooks Davis , FreeBSD-STABLE Mailing List , Ian Lepore , FreeBSD Net , "Julian H. Stacey" , Michelle Sullivan , "freebsd-arch@freebsd.org" , freebsd-fcp@freebsd.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL121h (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 13:45:11 +0000 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 13:05:21 -0000 > > On 24 Oct 2018, at 01:23, Warner Losh wrote: > > > > On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 6:02 PM Rodney W. Grimes < > > freebsd-rwg@pdx.rh.cn85.dnsmgr.net> wrote: > > > >> -- Start of PGP signed section. > >>> On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 04:26:45PM -0700, Rodney W. Grimes wrote: > >>>>> On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 5:07 PM Rodney W. Grimes < > >>>>> freebsd-rwg@pdx.rh.cn85.dnsmgr.net> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>>> On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 11:33:35PM +0200, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > >>>>>>>>> I'd also suggest that rl stands in stark contrast to the cs, > >> wb, sn, > >>>>>> smc, > >>>>>>>>> sf, tl, tx and vr drivers, which nobody has mentioned in this > >>>>>> thread, and > >>>>>>>>> which I doubt are in use in any FreeBSD system of any age > >> today. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> vr is used by my TV driver laptop: > >>>>>>>> http://www.berklix.com/~jhs/hardware/laptops/novatech-8355/ > >>>>>>>> vr0: flags=8843 metric > >> 0 mtu > >>>>>> 1500 > >>>>>>>> options=82808 > >>>>>>>> ether 00:40:d0:5e:26:38 > >>>>>>>> inet 192.168.91.65 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast > >> 192.168.91.255 > >>>>>>>> media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX > >>>>>> ) > >>>>>>>> status: active > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Which currently runs 8.4-RELEASE & eg xrandr, but I'll upgrade > >> soon > >>>>>>>> when I also configure it to receive from a raspberry-pi TV VPN > >> server. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> The above was a typo. vr is on the the STAY list. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> -- Brooks > >>>>>> Brooks, > >>>>>> Is there a public revised version of FCP-0101 that > >> reflects the > >>>>>> feedback which is what core is voting on? > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> Its on github, just like it's been the whole time for anybody to see, > >>>>> submit pull requests against and track: > >>>> > >>>> I have no gh account, desires no gh account, so have no way to > >>>> submit a change request other than through direct email to > >>>> brooks or another gh user. This is fundementally flawed. > >>>> > >>>>> https://github.com/freebsd/fcp/blob/master/fcp-0101.md > >>>> > >>>> Thank you for the link, I had looked at it before MeetBSD, > >>>> which did not have most of the recent changes done "a day ago". > >>>> > >>>> Isnt this document now in a frozen state while core reviews/votes? > >>> > >>> I sent it to a vote at c224c67557297d7cba909ad008542cb60980cc6b only > >>> to notice a bug in table rendering. I submitted a pull request fix > >>> that and a missing word which was merged since neither was material. I > >>> suppose they could have waited or been skipped, but there's no value in > >>> the FCP process being bound by the sort of pointless rigidity that led > >>> to -DPOSIX_MISTAKE in every libc compile line. > >> > >> The FCP process itself is unclear on this point, > >> I think this should be clarified. > >> > >> It is much more clear on post approval: > >> Changes after acceptance > >> > >> FCPs may need revision after they have been moved into the > >> accepted state. In such cases, the author SHOULD update the > >> FCP to reflect the final conclusions. > >> If the changes are major, the FCP SHOULD be withdrawn > >> and restarted. > >> > > > > Good point Rod. While common sense suggests that trivial changes during the > > voting should be allowed for editorial purposes (eg fix grammar mistakes, > > table rendering etc), it's better to spell that out so there's no confusion. > > > > diff --git a/fcp-0000.md b/fcp-0000.md > > index b4fe0f3..c8cc6f7 100644 > > --- a/fcp-0000.md > > +++ b/fcp-0000.md > > @@ -144,7 +144,10 @@ When the discussion of a change has come to a suitable > > and acceptable close it > > SHOULD be updated to the `vote` state. > > > > At this time the FreeBSD Core Team will vote on the subject of the FCP. The > > -result of vote moves the FCP into the `accepted` or `rejected` state. > > +result of vote moves the FCP into the `accepted` or `rejected` state. The > > +core team MAY make minor edits to the FCP to correct minor mistakes. Core > > +MAY return the proposal to the submitter if there are major problems that > > +need to be addressed. > > This is a Bad Idea, because it relies on common understanding of what is minor. I was once involved with a standards body that had a procedure for so-called clerical errors intended to deal with typos, punctuation etc; this worked just fine until somebody claimed that the omission of the word ?not? in a particular place was clearly a clerical error. And I have read case law that boiled down to the presents vs absence of a comma in an agreement that had results far beyond "minor". Use of words minor and major should be red flags unless both or explicitly defined, and even then those definitions often have issues themselves. > > FCPs in the `accepted` state can be updated and corrected. > > See the "Changes after acceptance" section for more information. > > > > Normally I'd submit that as a pull request, but since I know you don't use > > github, I thought I'd present it here to see if this answers your concerns > > before doing so. > > > > Warner > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > -- > Bob Bishop > rb@gid.co.uk -- Rod Grimes rgrimes@freebsd.org From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Oct 24 13:59:46 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6041BFE92F9; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 13:59:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net) Received: from pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net (br1.CN84in.dnsmgr.net [69.59.192.140]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C4656910C8; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 13:59:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net) Received: from pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id w9ODxg2o028398; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 06:59:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net) Received: (from freebsd-rwg@localhost) by pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id w9ODxgF8028397; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 06:59:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg) From: "Rodney W. Grimes" Message-Id: <201810241359.w9ODxgF8028397@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net> Subject: Re: FCP-0101: Deprecating most 10/100 Ethernet drivers In-Reply-To: To: Warner Losh Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 06:59:42 -0700 (PDT) CC: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-net@freebsd.org, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org, freebsd-fcp@freebsd.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL121h (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 13:59:46 -0000 ... deleted ... ... cc list trimmed, getting too many recepient gripes from mailman ... > > > > diff --git a/fcp-0000.md b/fcp-0000.md > > > > index b4fe0f3..c8cc6f7 100644 > > > > --- a/fcp-0000.md > > > > +++ b/fcp-0000.md > > > > @@ -144,7 +144,10 @@ When the discussion of a change has come to a > > suitable > > > > and acceptable close it > > > > SHOULD be updated to the `vote` state. > > > > > > > > At this time the FreeBSD Core Team will vote on the subject of the > > FCP. The > > > > -result of vote moves the FCP into the `accepted` or `rejected` state. > > > > +result of vote moves the FCP into the `accepted` or `rejected` state. > > The > > > > +core team MAY make minor edits to the FCP to correct minor mistakes. > > Core > > > > +MAY return the proposal to the submitter if there are major problems > > that > > > > +need to be addressed. > > > > > > This is a Bad Idea, because it relies on common understanding of what is > > minor. I was once involved with a standards body that had a procedure for > > so-called clerical errors intended to deal with typos, punctuation etc; > > this worked just fine until somebody claimed that the omission of the word > > ?not? in a particular place was clearly a clerical error. > > > > And I have read case law that boiled down to the presents vs absence > > of a comma in an agreement that had results far beyond "minor". > > > > Use of words minor and major should be red flags unless both > > or explicitly defined, and even then those definitions often > > have issues themselves. > > > > I'm not going to define every single word. FCP documents describe process. > They are not legal documents, nor should they be. Major and minor have > common enough meanings, and the basis of bylaws is that we trust core@. The trust isssue is not core (though in this specific case it is a core member submitting the FCP, that is not going to be the case always). The trust issue is do we allow the Author to make this minor/major change decission and how does core get informed that it has happened? -- Rod Grimes rgrimes@freebsd.org From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Oct 24 14:05:50 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1466FE9D4A; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 14:05:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from land.berklix.org (land.berklix.org [144.76.10.75]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "land.berklix.org", Issuer "land.berklix.org" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7E07292072; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 14:05:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from mart.js.berklix.net (p2E52CCDC.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [46.82.204.220]) (authenticated bits=0) by land.berklix.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id w9OE5hYG000884 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 24 Oct 2018 14:05:47 GMT (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (fire.js.berklix.net [192.168.91.41]) by mart.js.berklix.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id w9OE5cPE043465; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 16:05:38 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fire.js.berklix.net (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id w9OE5QmW040635; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 16:05:38 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Message-Id: <201810241405.w9OE5QmW040635@fire.js.berklix.net> To: "FreeBSD-Stable Mail List " , FreeBSD Net Mail List"" , "FreeBSD Arch Mail List" , freebsd-fcp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FCP-0101: Deprecating most 10/100 Ethernet drivers From: "Julian H. Stacey" Organization: http://berklix.eu BSD Unix Linux Consultants, Munich Germany User-agent: EXMH on FreeBSD http://berklix.eu/free/ X-From: http://www.berklix.eu/~jhs/ In-reply-to: Your message "Wed, 24 Oct 2018 07:44:26 -0600." Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 16:05:26 +0200 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 14:05:50 -0000 I suggest posters to this lively thread could strip inherited personal CC addresses . Then ~/.procmailrc that sorts list mail away from real personal ~/mail/Inbox will protect xbiff from beeping so much :-) Cheers, Julian -- Julian Stacey, Computer Consultant, Systems Engineer, BSD Linux Unix, Munich. Brexit referendum stole 3,700,000 Brits votes abroad, inc. 700,000 in EU. Campaign lies, criminal funding, economy & pound down. Time for an honest ref. http://exitbrexit.uk https://www.peoples-vote.uk/petition https://eci.ec.europa.eu/002/public/#/initiative From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Oct 24 14:10:01 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D58F1FEA558; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 14:10:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from land.berklix.org (land.berklix.org [144.76.10.75]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "land.berklix.org", Issuer "land.berklix.org" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 58C2192ECB; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 14:10:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from mart.js.berklix.net (p2E52CCDC.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [46.82.204.220]) (authenticated bits=0) by land.berklix.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id w9OE9tuA000977 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 24 Oct 2018 14:09:59 GMT (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (fire.js.berklix.net [192.168.91.41]) by mart.js.berklix.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id w9OE9oUt043495; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 16:09:50 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fire.js.berklix.net (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id w9OE9cHH040720; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 16:09:50 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Message-Id: <201810241409.w9OE9cHH040720@fire.js.berklix.net> To: FreeBSD-STABLE Mailing List , FreeBSD Net , "freebsd-arch@freebsd.org" , freebsd-fcp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FCP-0101: Deprecating most 10/100 Ethernet drivers From: "Julian H. Stacey" Organization: http://berklix.eu BSD Unix Linux Consultants, Munich Germany User-agent: EXMH on FreeBSD http://berklix.eu/free/ X-From: http://www.berklix.eu/~jhs/ In-reply-to: Your message "Wed, 24 Oct 2018 06:54:01 -0700." <201810241354.w9ODs1MD028342@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net> Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 16:09:38 +0200 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 14:10:02 -0000 "Rodney W. Grimes" wrote: > We could add that once the document is submitted to core > any change to it between submitting and vote by core requires > core to be involved, even if it is simply an ack of a change > has been made to what was submitted. Yes ! Cheers, Julian -- Julian Stacey, Computer Consultant, Systems Engineer, BSD Linux Unix, Munich. Brexit referendum stole 3,700,000 Brits votes abroad, inc. 700,000 in EU. Campaign lies, criminal funding, economy & pound down. Time for an honest ref. http://exitbrexit.uk https://www.peoples-vote.uk/petition https://eci.ec.europa.eu/002/public/#/initiative From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Oct 24 13:09:52 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2ECC107A88E; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 13:09:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rb@gid.co.uk) Received: from mx0.gid.co.uk (mx0.gid.co.uk [194.32.164.250]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6283988C3C; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 13:09:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rb@gid.co.uk) Received: from [194.32.164.30] ([194.32.164.30]) by mx0.gid.co.uk (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id w9OB2V7V059852; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 12:02:32 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from rb@gid.co.uk) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\)) Subject: Re: FCP-0101: Deprecating most 10/100 Ethernet drivers From: Bob Bishop In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 12:02:29 +0100 Cc: "Rodney W. Grimes" , Brooks Davis , FreeBSD-STABLE Mailing List , Ian Lepore , FreeBSD Net , "Julian H. Stacey" , Michelle Sullivan , "freebsd-arch@freebsd.org" , freebsd-fcp@freebsd.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <9257C84A-CA7C-42B9-9AD8-89AE33C96356@gid.co.uk> References: <20181023233716.GA15106@spindle.one-eyed-alien.net> <201810240002.w9O02tXg025019@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net> To: Warner Losh X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 14:10:42 +0000 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 13:09:52 -0000 > On 24 Oct 2018, at 01:23, Warner Losh wrote: >=20 > On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 6:02 PM Rodney W. Grimes < > freebsd-rwg@pdx.rh.cn85.dnsmgr.net> wrote: >=20 >> -- Start of PGP signed section. >>> On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 04:26:45PM -0700, Rodney W. Grimes wrote: >>>>> On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 5:07 PM Rodney W. Grimes < >>>>> freebsd-rwg@pdx.rh.cn85.dnsmgr.net> wrote: >>>>>=20 >>>>>>> On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 11:33:35PM +0200, Julian H. Stacey = wrote: >>>>>>>>> I'd also suggest that rl stands in stark contrast to the cs, >> wb, sn, >>>>>> smc, >>>>>>>>> sf, tl, tx and vr drivers, which nobody has mentioned in this >>>>>> thread, and >>>>>>>>> which I doubt are in use in any FreeBSD system of any age >> today. >>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>> vr is used by my TV driver laptop: >>>>>>>> http://www.berklix.com/~jhs/hardware/laptops/novatech-8355/ >>>>>>>> vr0: flags=3D8843 = metric >> 0 mtu >>>>>> 1500 >>>>>>>> options=3D82808 >>>>>>>> ether 00:40:d0:5e:26:38 >>>>>>>> inet 192.168.91.65 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast >> 192.168.91.255 >>>>>>>> media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX >>>>>> ) >>>>>>>> status: active >>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>> Which currently runs 8.4-RELEASE & eg xrandr, but I'll upgrade >> soon >>>>>>>> when I also configure it to receive from a raspberry-pi TV VPN >> server. >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> The above was a typo. vr is on the the STAY list. >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> -- Brooks >>>>>> Brooks, >>>>>> Is there a public revised version of FCP-0101 that >> reflects the >>>>>> feedback which is what core is voting on? >>>>>>=20 >>>>>=20 >>>>> Its on github, just like it's been the whole time for anybody to = see, >>>>> submit pull requests against and track: >>>>=20 >>>> I have no gh account, desires no gh account, so have no way to >>>> submit a change request other than through direct email to >>>> brooks or another gh user. This is fundementally flawed. >>>>=20 >>>>> https://github.com/freebsd/fcp/blob/master/fcp-0101.md >>>>=20 >>>> Thank you for the link, I had looked at it before MeetBSD, >>>> which did not have most of the recent changes done "a day ago". >>>>=20 >>>> Isnt this document now in a frozen state while core reviews/votes? >>>=20 >>> I sent it to a vote at c224c67557297d7cba909ad008542cb60980cc6b only >>> to notice a bug in table rendering. I submitted a pull request fix >>> that and a missing word which was merged since neither was material. = I >>> suppose they could have waited or been skipped, but there's no value = in >>> the FCP process being bound by the sort of pointless rigidity that = led >>> to -DPOSIX_MISTAKE in every libc compile line. >>=20 >> The FCP process itself is unclear on this point, >> I think this should be clarified. >>=20 >> It is much more clear on post approval: >> Changes after acceptance >>=20 >> FCPs may need revision after they have been moved into the >> accepted state. In such cases, the author SHOULD update the >> FCP to reflect the final conclusions. >> If the changes are major, the FCP SHOULD be withdrawn >> and restarted. >>=20 >=20 > Good point Rod. While common sense suggests that trivial changes = during the > voting should be allowed for editorial purposes (eg fix grammar = mistakes, > table rendering etc), it's better to spell that out so there's no = confusion. >=20 > diff --git a/fcp-0000.md b/fcp-0000.md > index b4fe0f3..c8cc6f7 100644 > --- a/fcp-0000.md > +++ b/fcp-0000.md > @@ -144,7 +144,10 @@ When the discussion of a change has come to a = suitable > and acceptable close it > SHOULD be updated to the `vote` state. >=20 > At this time the FreeBSD Core Team will vote on the subject of the = FCP. The > -result of vote moves the FCP into the `accepted` or `rejected` state. > +result of vote moves the FCP into the `accepted` or `rejected` state. = The > +core team MAY make minor edits to the FCP to correct minor mistakes. = Core > +MAY return the proposal to the submitter if there are major problems = that > +need to be addressed. This is a Bad Idea, because it relies on common understanding of what is = minor. I was once involved with a standards body that had a procedure = for so-called clerical errors intended to deal with typos, punctuation = etc; this worked just fine until somebody claimed that the omission of = the word =E2=80=9Cnot=E2=80=9D in a particular place was clearly a = clerical error. > FCPs in the `accepted` state can be updated and corrected. > See the "Changes after acceptance" section for more information. >=20 > Normally I'd submit that as a pull request, but since I know you don't = use > github, I thought I'd present it here to see if this answers your = concerns > before doing so. >=20 > Warner > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >=20 -- Bob Bishop rb@gid.co.uk From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Oct 24 13:41:56 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30436FD9A17; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 13:41:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [18.222.6.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.soaustin.net", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D85C48EA61; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 13:41:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from lonesome.com (unknown [18.188.142.31]) by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3CB622EBA8; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 13:41:55 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 13:41:54 +0000 From: Mark Linimon To: "Rodney W. Grimes" Cc: Bob Bishop , Brooks Davis , FreeBSD-STABLE Mailing List , Ian Lepore , FreeBSD Net , "Julian H. Stacey" , Michelle Sullivan , "freebsd-arch@freebsd.org" , freebsd-fcp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FCP-0101: Deprecating most 10/100 Ethernet drivers Message-ID: <20181024134153.GC3125@lonesome.com> References: <9257C84A-CA7C-42B9-9AD8-89AE33C96356@gid.co.uk> <201810241219.w9OCJXTd027720@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201810241219.w9OCJXTd027720@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 14:10:42 +0000 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 13:41:56 -0000 On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 05:19:33AM -0700, Rodney W. Grimes wrote: > And I have read case law that boiled down to the presents vs absence > of a comma If we are now going to evaluate all proposed changes to FreeBSD on the same rigid principles as the US legal system, I'm done. mcl From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Oct 24 13:44:40 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E43E6FD9D07 for ; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 13:44:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wlosh@bsdimp.com) Received: from mail-ua1-x941.google.com (mail-ua1-x941.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::941]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 08C858EE6E for ; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 13:44:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wlosh@bsdimp.com) Received: by mail-ua1-x941.google.com with SMTP id b3so1875359uak.3 for ; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 06:44:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bsdimp-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=2DXuiWjjvcOgNMSyAZpPAN2uFGwXsKfvo59f+0Wz8a8=; b=pakNqQO+a2iHXaLpQNJT7nQWWAUlaYzNRuEnD4cw+F6Pg8NaDxOoM6yBiOY1iv2Hlj 6myGynn/mzSC4NBljs7ZuxAmxQXzj32xHmKCIGuFBqIpNRUGn/mPAsPiDhhplhb0q4GZ OcEiR8fYCc7F3R4jj+1WGsWNuW9xA4LpjN437whWF2ODtYJYbLVEzHqnHzi50Uy09mwn yWQRI1yqjA3OMyDLgfCr9vVkKfYCPsZo+zNLeixPL3lJmshz+QSedGB5jYXvMbDzzj3I I7KtN7szGN8l6uwowpAptokfPvg49gG4zFbjn3cTN5EYg3vtfedplZE6C4iENlyeqtwV uutw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=2DXuiWjjvcOgNMSyAZpPAN2uFGwXsKfvo59f+0Wz8a8=; b=ky8dmH/FbK2B5h4dH3nSXv7vsn9kg9RVn23BlXftumxulcYcKjq4uVJRJNxRbpfY3E 4i0F/F3BcsU4LfTrA60N0nsohOyHyyqdY19XASlF+ZeQCeiMvrD7pPJljDO5iGwsmAax 8GMgN4XDboC/oncsYqn8Jh7B1de3nVES6rIXjL1nbmM4cT7H0AAFXIxInbN4l7qiv120 rnkd9yUXm8rzmbg98I+mdsVZrtbLZ1gddpyKSqfqQmPsmK+IYvKoYGWFS0m2WWm9k9ny cAFvIpwz4OCAswVduq13zvRF7aRSdfjMWg4gXL/LqY9UP8CN1C1sBzVAehTsAGO87VdT lC6Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AGRZ1gKD/g/u+nJNUdvx2gPknrVHAS8i8KSUJ5UkeUtnmP0whRlz6A1B vn3nAOGKnYugbGj258KX7NC7kyAn0mcNx2vc+OFmQQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5dXkqJdUZq4ZQb1kNFWEuItozQybopyAqw8QaVs+hio60L1zj0p7kVMYK7KrYehJ5NhaIkIAAZFf67lTEL9Bxc= X-Received: by 2002:ab0:14a4:: with SMTP id d33mr1115424uae.41.1540388678365; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 06:44:38 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <9257C84A-CA7C-42B9-9AD8-89AE33C96356@gid.co.uk> <201810241219.w9OCJXTd027720@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net> In-Reply-To: <201810241219.w9OCJXTd027720@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net> From: Warner Losh Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 07:44:26 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: FCP-0101: Deprecating most 10/100 Ethernet drivers To: "Rodney W. Grimes" Cc: Bob Bishop , Brooks Davis , FreeBSD-STABLE Mailing List , Ian Lepore , FreeBSD Net , "Julian H. Stacey" , Michelle Sullivan , "freebsd-arch@freebsd.org" , freebsd-fcp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 14:10:42 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 13:44:40 -0000 On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 6:19 AM Rodney W. Grimes < freebsd-rwg@pdx.rh.cn85.dnsmgr.net> wrote: > > > On 24 Oct 2018, at 01:23, Warner Losh wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 6:02 PM Rodney W. Grimes < > > > freebsd-rwg@pdx.rh.cn85.dnsmgr.net> wrote: > > > > > >> -- Start of PGP signed section. > > >>> On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 04:26:45PM -0700, Rodney W. Grimes wrote: > > >>>>> On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 5:07 PM Rodney W. Grimes < > > >>>>> freebsd-rwg@pdx.rh.cn85.dnsmgr.net> wrote: > > >>>>> > > >>>>>>> On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 11:33:35PM +0200, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > > >>>>>>>>> I'd also suggest that rl stands in stark contrast to the cs, > > >> wb, sn, > > >>>>>> smc, > > >>>>>>>>> sf, tl, tx and vr drivers, which nobody has mentioned in this > > >>>>>> thread, and > > >>>>>>>>> which I doubt are in use in any FreeBSD system of any age > > >> today. > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> vr is used by my TV driver laptop: > > >>>>>>>> http://www.berklix.com/~jhs/hardware/laptops/novatech-8355/ > > >>>>>>>> vr0: flags=8843 metric > > >> 0 mtu > > >>>>>> 1500 > > >>>>>>>> options=82808 > > >>>>>>>> ether 00:40:d0:5e:26:38 > > >>>>>>>> inet 192.168.91.65 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast > > >> 192.168.91.255 > > >>>>>>>> media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX > > >>>>>> ) > > >>>>>>>> status: active > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> Which currently runs 8.4-RELEASE & eg xrandr, but I'll upgrade > > >> soon > > >>>>>>>> when I also configure it to receive from a raspberry-pi TV VPN > > >> server. > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> The above was a typo. vr is on the the STAY list. > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> -- Brooks > > >>>>>> Brooks, > > >>>>>> Is there a public revised version of FCP-0101 that > > >> reflects the > > >>>>>> feedback which is what core is voting on? > > >>>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Its on github, just like it's been the whole time for anybody to > see, > > >>>>> submit pull requests against and track: > > >>>> > > >>>> I have no gh account, desires no gh account, so have no way to > > >>>> submit a change request other than through direct email to > > >>>> brooks or another gh user. This is fundementally flawed. > > >>>> > > >>>>> https://github.com/freebsd/fcp/blob/master/fcp-0101.md > > >>>> > > >>>> Thank you for the link, I had looked at it before MeetBSD, > > >>>> which did not have most of the recent changes done "a day ago". > > >>>> > > >>>> Isnt this document now in a frozen state while core reviews/votes? > > >>> > > >>> I sent it to a vote at c224c67557297d7cba909ad008542cb60980cc6b only > > >>> to notice a bug in table rendering. I submitted a pull request fix > > >>> that and a missing word which was merged since neither was > material. I > > >>> suppose they could have waited or been skipped, but there's no value > in > > >>> the FCP process being bound by the sort of pointless rigidity that > led > > >>> to -DPOSIX_MISTAKE in every libc compile line. > > >> > > >> The FCP process itself is unclear on this point, > > >> I think this should be clarified. > > >> > > >> It is much more clear on post approval: > > >> Changes after acceptance > > >> > > >> FCPs may need revision after they have been moved into the > > >> accepted state. In such cases, the author SHOULD update the > > >> FCP to reflect the final conclusions. > > >> If the changes are major, the FCP SHOULD be withdrawn > > >> and restarted. > > >> > > > > > > Good point Rod. While common sense suggests that trivial changes > during the > > > voting should be allowed for editorial purposes (eg fix grammar > mistakes, > > > table rendering etc), it's better to spell that out so there's no > confusion. > > > > > > diff --git a/fcp-0000.md b/fcp-0000.md > > > index b4fe0f3..c8cc6f7 100644 > > > --- a/fcp-0000.md > > > +++ b/fcp-0000.md > > > @@ -144,7 +144,10 @@ When the discussion of a change has come to a > suitable > > > and acceptable close it > > > SHOULD be updated to the `vote` state. > > > > > > At this time the FreeBSD Core Team will vote on the subject of the > FCP. The > > > -result of vote moves the FCP into the `accepted` or `rejected` state. > > > +result of vote moves the FCP into the `accepted` or `rejected` state. > The > > > +core team MAY make minor edits to the FCP to correct minor mistakes. > Core > > > +MAY return the proposal to the submitter if there are major problems > that > > > +need to be addressed. > > > > This is a Bad Idea, because it relies on common understanding of what is > minor. I was once involved with a standards body that had a procedure for > so-called clerical errors intended to deal with typos, punctuation etc; > this worked just fine until somebody claimed that the omission of the word > ?not? in a particular place was clearly a clerical error. > > And I have read case law that boiled down to the presents vs absence > of a comma in an agreement that had results far beyond "minor". > > Use of words minor and major should be red flags unless both > or explicitly defined, and even then those definitions often > have issues themselves. > I'm not going to define every single word. FCP documents describe process. They are not legal documents, nor should they be. Major and minor have common enough meanings, and the basis of bylaws is that we trust core@. Warner > > > FCPs in the `accepted` state can be updated and corrected. > > > See the "Changes after acceptance" section for more information. > > > > > > Normally I'd submit that as a pull request, but since I know you don't > use > > > github, I thought I'd present it here to see if this answers your > concerns > > > before doing so. > > > > > > Warner > > > _______________________________________________ > > > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > > > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > > > > -- > > Bob Bishop > > rb@gid.co.uk > > -- > Rod Grimes > rgrimes@freebsd.org > From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Oct 24 13:39:33 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA066FD95E7 for ; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 13:39:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wlosh@bsdimp.com) Received: from mail-ua1-x92a.google.com (mail-ua1-x92a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::92a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D000F8E41A for ; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 13:39:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wlosh@bsdimp.com) Received: by mail-ua1-x92a.google.com with SMTP id i30so1857280uae.11 for ; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 06:39:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bsdimp-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Ce+lKE4X4hw50P1h1G+iDhJtzQKtDvxqDUQWTCm/zKE=; b=U+gSsvik04vqMe9Cc/8IVBPsC9F3pOozU2dAod8wjwSmYH5J/EryEqaIo+wJDRWP6M UBVdeSQOhhm1cwjVJUbAYD5IGydWBDvb8tqy1uAQM9WpKSJ+0gv5r2BR3UX64UPqn+l5 b0us1D7JlZtuxBE4Cie7oLXD+h1OxnaXVauuk8Aq1pzeKRO1bJvCXsLUMBR+r97SLR+a x39fwWRc1iI5YcHO+EYr2tbgjcKA16H0nQANlAUIJDOPu5bOqutUlIvcip8OQ/JHWXde bxXFGYkHV9pkQvuO1yLsBPWlh1f4QXfB363eApiGjLs6QPgCOLVyqwD7GzVwc7TKQ8QP 9csA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Ce+lKE4X4hw50P1h1G+iDhJtzQKtDvxqDUQWTCm/zKE=; b=i15XStytPpg1BeEgNi7bVhlmM0QuzbdqD9kPb5SmK3ANx/MFNj/y4dXLYnRlN7SMI0 KHzxxJjJyYSQcdNjFXR3wBfZRaxDVYvjSjA36UE9NykWwx+o9yvwRgSIUBHfofyqQDXF yA2PDLlW1/WYUjpUmINYpqKfeW2EKTlsiXZdyvXFSt/UXajNYRkP6uD4pJYJTHbS/dRK H3v+xoHNbgnZcuH8FKJ2fqdwx7hAggj8bfEQib7FFSEXsDHhQw5uJkAAap/kFEXAE9zU HoTm3KKH+2UdH3PUymahdRZZpwKF/GltTQ59Al8W1lHa0KBF6FJZSISp4K8wv+DG2Co1 fbOg== X-Gm-Message-State: AGRZ1gIDyuHBbtIi+SErg5I+R8A4j0u+iW+sQn6b8riZF9fWBYjliuIT l2EAyqp/aEJ3ctnpDD+/vLhfo3z0BUW7uYVr6sUtsQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5dirytD25FAxg9qrHowfcJcAQMkWc1rCZbTcOiTB+772fCVD9SZwrRxVtIsVSuu2+xgSV9/oiAxNMSf6H3WmVI= X-Received: by 2002:ab0:53c3:: with SMTP id l3mr1139500uaa.16.1540388371742; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 06:39:31 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20181023233716.GA15106@spindle.one-eyed-alien.net> <201810240002.w9O02tXg025019@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net> <9257C84A-CA7C-42B9-9AD8-89AE33C96356@gid.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <9257C84A-CA7C-42B9-9AD8-89AE33C96356@gid.co.uk> From: Warner Losh Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 07:39:20 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: FCP-0101: Deprecating most 10/100 Ethernet drivers To: Bob Bishop Cc: "Rodney W. Grimes" , Brooks Davis , FreeBSD-STABLE Mailing List , Ian Lepore , FreeBSD Net , "Julian H. Stacey" , Michelle Sullivan , "freebsd-arch@freebsd.org" , freebsd-fcp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 14:10:42 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 13:39:34 -0000 On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 5:02 AM Bob Bishop wrote: > > > On 24 Oct 2018, at 01:23, Warner Losh wrote: > > > > On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 6:02 PM Rodney W. Grimes < > > freebsd-rwg@pdx.rh.cn85.dnsmgr.net> wrote: > > > >> -- Start of PGP signed section. > >>> On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 04:26:45PM -0700, Rodney W. Grimes wrote: > >>>>> On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 5:07 PM Rodney W. Grimes < > >>>>> freebsd-rwg@pdx.rh.cn85.dnsmgr.net> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>>> On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 11:33:35PM +0200, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > >>>>>>>>> I'd also suggest that rl stands in stark contrast to the cs, > >> wb, sn, > >>>>>> smc, > >>>>>>>>> sf, tl, tx and vr drivers, which nobody has mentioned in this > >>>>>> thread, and > >>>>>>>>> which I doubt are in use in any FreeBSD system of any age > >> today. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> vr is used by my TV driver laptop: > >>>>>>>> http://www.berklix.com/~jhs/hardware/laptops/novatech-8355/ > >>>>>>>> vr0: flags=3D8843 metric > >> 0 mtu > >>>>>> 1500 > >>>>>>>> options=3D82808 > >>>>>>>> ether 00:40:d0:5e:26:38 > >>>>>>>> inet 192.168.91.65 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast > >> 192.168.91.255 > >>>>>>>> media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX > >>>>>> ) > >>>>>>>> status: active > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Which currently runs 8.4-RELEASE & eg xrandr, but I'll upgrade > >> soon > >>>>>>>> when I also configure it to receive from a raspberry-pi TV VPN > >> server. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> The above was a typo. vr is on the the STAY list. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> -- Brooks > >>>>>> Brooks, > >>>>>> Is there a public revised version of FCP-0101 that > >> reflects the > >>>>>> feedback which is what core is voting on? > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> Its on github, just like it's been the whole time for anybody to se= e, > >>>>> submit pull requests against and track: > >>>> > >>>> I have no gh account, desires no gh account, so have no way to > >>>> submit a change request other than through direct email to > >>>> brooks or another gh user. This is fundementally flawed. > >>>> > >>>>> https://github.com/freebsd/fcp/blob/master/fcp-0101.md > >>>> > >>>> Thank you for the link, I had looked at it before MeetBSD, > >>>> which did not have most of the recent changes done "a day ago". > >>>> > >>>> Isnt this document now in a frozen state while core reviews/votes? > >>> > >>> I sent it to a vote at c224c67557297d7cba909ad008542cb60980cc6b only > >>> to notice a bug in table rendering. I submitted a pull request fix > >>> that and a missing word which was merged since neither was material. = I > >>> suppose they could have waited or been skipped, but there's no value = in > >>> the FCP process being bound by the sort of pointless rigidity that le= d > >>> to -DPOSIX_MISTAKE in every libc compile line. > >> > >> The FCP process itself is unclear on this point, > >> I think this should be clarified. > >> > >> It is much more clear on post approval: > >> Changes after acceptance > >> > >> FCPs may need revision after they have been moved into the > >> accepted state. In such cases, the author SHOULD update the > >> FCP to reflect the final conclusions. > >> If the changes are major, the FCP SHOULD be withdrawn > >> and restarted. > >> > > > > Good point Rod. While common sense suggests that trivial changes during > the > > voting should be allowed for editorial purposes (eg fix grammar mistake= s, > > table rendering etc), it's better to spell that out so there's no > confusion. > > > > diff --git a/fcp-0000.md b/fcp-0000.md > > index b4fe0f3..c8cc6f7 100644 > > --- a/fcp-0000.md > > +++ b/fcp-0000.md > > @@ -144,7 +144,10 @@ When the discussion of a change has come to a > suitable > > and acceptable close it > > SHOULD be updated to the `vote` state. > > > > At this time the FreeBSD Core Team will vote on the subject of the FCP. > The > > -result of vote moves the FCP into the `accepted` or `rejected` state. > > +result of vote moves the FCP into the `accepted` or `rejected` state. > The > > +core team MAY make minor edits to the FCP to correct minor mistakes. > Core > > +MAY return the proposal to the submitter if there are major problems > that > > +need to be addressed. > > This is a Bad Idea, because it relies on common understanding of what is > minor. I was once involved with a standards body that had a procedure for > so-called clerical errors intended to deal with typos, punctuation etc; > this worked just fine until somebody claimed that the omission of the wor= d > =E2=80=9Cnot=E2=80=9D in a particular place was clearly a clerical error. > This documents procedure. It's not law. Trying to read it as law is a mistake: it's written to be brief and descriptive, not through and prescriptive. And that's on purpose. Axiom 1 of the bylaws is that you can trust the core team, which is why the power grant is total and unequivocal: Core is the governing body of the project. If you can't trust the core team and need anything more, you've already list. And over the years core's biggest failing isn't some fleet of black helicopters dispatched to take out critics or other shenanigans. It's either been not doing enough for the situation (due to too little time and/or a mistaken impression that they couldn't do anything), or it's lack of clear communication either between the different 'hats' and core or between core and the rest of the project. Warner From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Oct 24 13:54:05 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56616FE5C52; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 13:54:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net) Received: from pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net (br1.CN84in.dnsmgr.net [69.59.192.140]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B6241906FD; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 13:54:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net) Received: from pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id w9ODs2i7028343; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 06:54:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net) Received: (from freebsd-rwg@localhost) by pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id w9ODs1MD028342; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 06:54:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg) From: "Rodney W. Grimes" Message-Id: <201810241354.w9ODs1MD028342@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net> Subject: Re: FCP-0101: Deprecating most 10/100 Ethernet drivers In-Reply-To: <20181024134153.GC3125@lonesome.com> To: Mark Linimon Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 06:54:01 -0700 (PDT) CC: Bob Bishop , Brooks Davis , FreeBSD-STABLE Mailing List , Ian Lepore , FreeBSD Net , "Julian H. Stacey" , Michelle Sullivan , "freebsd-arch@freebsd.org" , freebsd-fcp@freebsd.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL121h (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 14:10:42 +0000 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 13:54:05 -0000 > On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 05:19:33AM -0700, Rodney W. Grimes wrote: > > And I have read case law that boiled down to the presents vs absence > > of a comma > > If we are now going to evaluate all proposed changes to FreeBSD on the > same rigid principles as the US legal system, I'm done. I do not think "all" is in scope here, but I do feel should excercise care about procedure. And FYI, the case law above I am pretty sure was not US. I also believe that what is at issue here can be fixed rather easily without ever going down the minor vs major slippery slope by some rather simple changes to order of events and careful steps. Warner came very close, I think he just applied his correct "fix" to 1/2 of the problem. There is the stage where the FCP is before core being voted on, and there is the stage that the FCP has been approved. He only addressed 1 of those, and he did so by allowing core to trivially modify the document during the voting process, and I am actually fine with that idea, its good, it is what should be allowed. I trust core to know what is minor vs major. BUTT it still does not cover the issue of the author/submitter modifying the document while it is in core being reviewed and possibly modified. I have issue with that. It is very hard to vote/formally review on something that is fluid. I have not been asked to trust these people with the trust I give core, so I would like to remove that. We could add that once the document is submitted to core any change to it between submitting and vote by core requires core to be involved, even if it is simply an ack of a change has been made to what was submitted. -- Rod Grimes rgrimes@freebsd.org From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Oct 24 14:41:37 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4171EFECD4D; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 14:41:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net) Received: from pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net (br1.CN84in.dnsmgr.net [69.59.192.140]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B2471958CD; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 14:41:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net) Received: from pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id w9OEfVDq028731; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 07:41:31 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net) Received: (from freebsd-rwg@localhost) by pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id w9OEfV2B028730; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 07:41:31 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg) From: "Rodney W. Grimes" Message-Id: <201810241441.w9OEfV2B028730@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net> Subject: Re: FCP-0101: Deprecating most 10/100 Ethernet drivers In-Reply-To: <201810241409.w9OE9cHH040720@fire.js.berklix.net> To: "Julian H. Stacey" Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 07:41:31 -0700 (PDT) CC: FreeBSD-STABLE Mailing List , FreeBSD Net , "freebsd-arch@freebsd.org" , freebsd-fcp@freebsd.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL121h (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 14:41:37 -0000 > "Rodney W. Grimes" wrote: > > We could add that once the document is submitted to core > > any change to it between submitting and vote by core requires > > core to be involved, even if it is simply an ack of a change > > has been made to what was submitted. > > Yes ! And to expand on that further since core is under a 2 week timeline to complete this process any submitted change acceptable to core resets the 2 week timer, if core rejects the change the timer continues as original. -- Rod Grimes rgrimes@freebsd.org From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Oct 24 14:55:17 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E83B4FED73F; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 14:55:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rb@gid.co.uk) Received: from mx0.gid.co.uk (mx0.gid.co.uk [194.32.164.250]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 86B0196672; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 14:55:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rb@gid.co.uk) Received: from [194.32.164.27] ([194.32.164.27]) by mx0.gid.co.uk (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id w9OEtD1L009610; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 15:55:13 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from rb@gid.co.uk) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\)) Subject: Re: FCP-0101: Deprecating most 10/100 Ethernet drivers From: rb@gid.co.uk In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 15:55:13 +0100 Cc: "Rodney W. Grimes" , Brooks Davis , FreeBSD-STABLE Mailing List , Ian Lepore , FreeBSD Net , "Julian H. Stacey" , Michelle Sullivan , "freebsd-arch@freebsd.org" , freebsd-fcp@freebsd.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <994430B6-A8BC-4A1F-B15A-41E71DE5D47F@gid.co.uk> References: <20181023233716.GA15106@spindle.one-eyed-alien.net> <201810240002.w9O02tXg025019@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net> <9257C84A-CA7C-42B9-9AD8-89AE33C96356@gid.co.uk> To: Warner Losh X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 15:00:39 +0000 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 14:55:17 -0000 > On 24 Oct 2018, at 14:39, Warner Losh wrote: >=20 > [stuff trimmed] >=20 >> >> The FCP process itself is unclear on this point, >> >> I think this should be clarified. >> >>=20 >> >> It is much more clear on post approval: >> >> Changes after acceptance >> >>=20 >> >> FCPs may need revision after they have been moved into the >> >> accepted state. In such cases, the author SHOULD update the >> >> FCP to reflect the final conclusions. >> >> If the changes are major, the FCP SHOULD be withdrawn >> >> and restarted. >> >>=20 >> >=20 >> > Good point Rod. While common sense suggests that trivial changes = during the >> > voting should be allowed for editorial purposes (eg fix grammar = mistakes, >> > table rendering etc), it's better to spell that out so there's no = confusion. >> >=20 >> > diff --git a/fcp-0000.md b/fcp-0000.md >> > index b4fe0f3..c8cc6f7 100644 >> > --- a/fcp-0000.md >> > +++ b/fcp-0000.md >> > @@ -144,7 +144,10 @@ When the discussion of a change has come to a = suitable >> > and acceptable close it >> > SHOULD be updated to the `vote` state. >> >=20 >> > At this time the FreeBSD Core Team will vote on the subject of the = FCP. The >> > -result of vote moves the FCP into the `accepted` or `rejected` = state. >> > +result of vote moves the FCP into the `accepted` or `rejected` = state. The >> > +core team MAY make minor edits to the FCP to correct minor = mistakes. Core >> > +MAY return the proposal to the submitter if there are major = problems that >> > +need to be addressed. >>=20 >> This is a Bad Idea, because it relies on common understanding of what = is minor. I was once involved with a standards body that had a procedure = for so-called clerical errors intended to deal with typos, punctuation = etc; this worked just fine until somebody claimed that the omission of = the word =E2=80=9Cnot=E2=80=9D in a particular place was clearly a = clerical error. >=20 > This documents procedure. It's not law. Trying to read it as law is a = mistake: it's written to be brief and descriptive, not through and = prescriptive. And that's on purpose. Axiom 1 of the bylaws is that you = can trust the core team, which is why the power grant is total and = unequivocal: Core is the governing body of the project. If you can't = trust the core team and need anything more, you've already list. And = over the years core's biggest failing isn't some fleet of black = helicopters dispatched to take out critics or other shenanigans. It's = either been not doing enough for the situation (due to too little time = and/or a mistaken impression that they couldn't do anything), or it's = lack of clear communication either between the different 'hats' and core = or between core and the rest of the project. >=20 > Warner=20 No problem with any of that. If the intent is that =E2=80=9Ccore MAY = make unrestricted changes to the FCP and/or MAY return the proposal to = the submitter if there are problems that need to be addressed=E2=80=9D = then say so. -- Bob Bishop t: +44 (0)118 940 1243 rb@gid.co.uk m: +44 (0)783 626 4518 From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Oct 24 15:07:07 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22809FEE037 for ; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 15:07:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lev@FreeBSD.org) Received: from onlyone.not-for.work (onlyone.not-for.work [148.251.9.81]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A77B99711C for ; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 15:07:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lev@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [192.168.23.186] (unknown [89.113.128.32]) (Authenticated sender: lev@serebryakov.spb.ru) by onlyone.not-for.work (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AE5F0DD1 for ; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 18:06:59 +0300 (MSK) To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Reply-To: lev@FreeBSD.org From: Lev Serebryakov Subject: Very high lock contention in tcp_usr_send() which looks to limit if_gif performance with standard MTU Openpgp: preference=signencrypt Autocrypt: addr=lev@FreeBSD.org; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= xsFNBFKbGksBEADeguVs+XyJc3mL3iiOBqDd16wSk97YTJYOi4VsHsINzJr09oFvNDiaDBIi fLn2p8XcJvehcsF2GSgrfXfw+uK4O1jyNIKJmiYA0EtE+ZbRtvDrrE0w6Q8+SDeKA21SWh3Y vSQ0DJUontbgW55ER2CbEiIUTIn34uQ0kmESAaw/v5p/9ue8yPTmURvv130FqPFz8VPzltqL NxyGt54TxPfKAzAHEIwxlEZ63JOwzloKh1UDBExcsf9nJO08/TAVgR5UZ5njFBPzaaquhRoP qPJLEQQDqxPIlvMNtHKf7iIebE4BHeqgCdJA0BoiR6gpa0wlsZtdrTPK3n4wYSphLvGbhfOZ YW/hbcu7HYS/FImkVxB3iY17kcC1UTnx4ZaYeASPBGOOPbXky1lLfmDGWIFT//70yx+G17qD OZzF1SvJJhGvh6ilFYaWMX7T+nIp6Mcafc4D7AakXM+XdubNXOMlCJhzPcZ0skgAEnYV587w V7em5fDVwQccwvtfezzqKeJAU5TGiywBHSR5Svzk2FwRNf6M//hWkpq0SRR63iOhkHGOAEBi 69GfEIwH2/w24rLxP0E+Hqq8n+EWNkPatw1Mhcl5PKkdvGCjJUaGNMkpBffjyYo254JXRscR eEnwdIkJt4ErDvjb2/UrOFq31wWMOiLzJeVchAgvTHBMRfP9aQARAQABzShMZXYgU2VyZWJy eWFrb3YgPGxldkBzZXJlYnJ5YWtvdi5zcGIucnU+wsGCBBMBCAAsAhsDBwsJCAcDAgEGFQgC CQoLBBYCAwECHgECF4ACGQEFAlKbP8wFCQlmJwEACgkQ6rA8WL/cR4/6VBAAjRMyyX3PBFx/ HxyiIZ698EfwlWUua8Ft4crtrdK52m0qNkbBB9BH8xQgBHG32A1CwyzQnzxHgZuoOWMjh+Qq WJv7dmpM/q/c1GCJHhlPgewXrciTwpAamZILN071u+1GCPWwGRPzfQ/U+k63KJWx9ozf4doM WTTom6Cqcssi4J1u5kkt52a5ZRhsCK9pEVGilk36XTP9BakGrnMSIxF/NK4xeZVX2q+Nuqvf RchyofKXVgLEDLwb1cd/baLtBpDzy0PTN2Zl2lX4kOA6jwTKsqRya9A1Vui1KXwPh2XViTQ1 7Y3l5qg/M+sR73DohezP6bO6huOnLhty17jAqHPNlD6RonDo+j8uIlEg4iMSTN3MhzkBAu0Q pe3ucQ0o1767JiXN3fsNvRzSFhLVNDqPLce4uKlMogsbreXWvdgHGTN1ybOHGbybZnP77yHz uNBacbmG3vL/OLXMqwLdL2JXoiec4DmXjjCdhTBl5xLV9Hz/6VWKqElteg8QFVvHB3tHWzJ4 /rpiVEixytCIII6DS33BXZ0h2EOkK/6AYA2SJxy1vgOH4SZBtDBHoezmHV2nFnq5O0c7AuAB 7WPWgQG0sEwHQPZmg/baRGitRJnaxf/Gvf1DeD1x1VrcoVke2vwBcgDM3kugP8L9hsqic2D3 dI+gP76haeuvNNZr3y9L9zvOwU0EUpsaSwEQALRr3B+OjY/cnJPstz5CVsVWyEZtJtrNviZr tBgbkhlkPm98sEWR4+gbpyeufdYJengDjeGzMDKcLB7h5fICS/j6A8XdlJ40TlbPfNgb6OHa ebaIYKTJpXKR9sD7ZyGivYMofm0em40wGUX7BIkdkomaWj+wUiS0CdXU0FWDj9wv73+Eim+X zZyXeFgIPv97v+pET7DfwKkADOfrkW9s4OfvGVjd+wm35wc8EngQEz0qdPBxx74X7vZFAxlA SXu8gDBJGYt2Bkc3QwULnfeXrZJWgqNPR5o44gGu96yaiOFaN/C6CJtev5ZEX+0ZxbvsHHB7 Z5AtsRURKpZ4w5HFHGhzHtDtoAKgeZ/gbhTVXPHvNQR818eN+Nl5BV8BRF/8yhR6VlJb8GYw h8oKDeVGVYC34+raHZQAM9WoBnN7jlt4T9zzPwtmw5mIahGFgvw1KDr7OItN2ZgtZ20UYC5m Go602nmHq0aPbU6SwGi1xohrliNsKaaciYiMaVIGRQq8iGr9Fe2HlvaA3BpB275i/gCVlUdG y5XLAv+yQMUvn5Z7XVsMroxDk/O+ae1ElyBvKiKyfWGJXTg5XUukkkyQmfWPxWUGoNA1P/P4 GMHSu7/Rqe/7m4uPu/RyTTqsSjjKJdP9kBwEzvqPtXsVoZuShtrptRQJDYflhgE4qmKSMKen ABEBAAHCwWUEGAECAA8FAlKbGksCGwwFCRLMAwAACgkQ6rA8WL/cR48RkA//SNzeW3CI8KHx rA0aeHW6Nb5ieoqVRBGLyjBM06RX6vHB9v4dJL6Z+yV2jGN2s+XZX2HILbuTOwcTxGkI3xTT e0cDXVaF5K8R/liigUjtwuC2v/sWgoWyUmK1Cy9CPYdcXmFq6nESfkUe8DYiGOUULdHq5w63 F53yOZ72iXRBQBZgkhPtRFu4lPYIzOsMag9DIJ9CthR1r0ziqU/keb94Qt3l+aXK7CwGdY7X T4zUIMHNYsuAuyX+NJIXfsN68TT6m7QmlUwxPs13nxmoVQzm4ruV+hlQKh1MtbsjWRkNgPxF IPiqoAEhy8QoddlSvRTwL5Z7zFQiwMdiXU7toL8pfzj/zJR1jELXKMipijrt5MLrV8XX3OPN yZZvh95VIl8mv+iAqwSZUufd2EJnvj5TObB0eH+a+34NWf/XqA3fPjE6KHzmdnw9PZjPEjlx JCPECSs+6gse1+GaEfKYuXzB/ENe2ctlcfx5iQJXFc+/+zG/uU/JX/pXJHA12CUfB5g7lH6X BZIHvRo3VTCDjXgbF5xxDAe5V4exf8d4oSNjQIFLYxxN7zkvH89EN6RPfRgsWN7bYArCwfS9 MOgs9pFeCOewR6qieK150aoqNENGfKFXJup+5VVl6I0mU+j0rgVDZDht2/QgP/Tb4lGBe+ai pOGaK/GYNR+Ad6bUmokKsx4= Organization: FreeBSD Message-ID: <1ba8044b-9dea-8d22-1fc8-e15ff7b18794@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 18:06:53 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="LPSH1QUfrB0Vb7nNGnUCTBKrbYxLyGVEh" X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 15:07:07 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --LPSH1QUfrB0Vb7nNGnUCTBKrbYxLyGVEh Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="3qQE843I85WSOce41UXqygxSapGYHyerT"; protected-headers="v1" From: Lev Serebryakov Reply-To: lev@FreeBSD.org To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Message-ID: <1ba8044b-9dea-8d22-1fc8-e15ff7b18794@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Very high lock contention in tcp_usr_send() which looks to limit if_gif performance with standard MTU --3qQE843I85WSOce41UXqygxSapGYHyerT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I've benchmarked if_gre and if_gif encapsulation on not-so-powerful hardware. Test is very simple: single as-fast-as-possible TCP stream via tunnel to much-more performant server over 1G physical interface. I was surprised by very high price of encapsulation with standard MTU of 1280 bytes. Performance in such configuration is about 45% of line speed (440Mbit instead of 1Gbit). I can not believe, that adding one header to each packet is SO expensive. Also, in such case userland thread of benchmark (nuttcp or iperf3) consumes 100% of CPU (one core) and kernel thread (if_config_tqg_0 or if_config_tqg_1) consumes 100% of CPY (second core). Physical interface with MTU of 1280 and switched off hardware "helpers" shows 800Mbit/s and CPU is not-so-consumed, userland and kernel consume about 50% + 50% of CPU, not 100% + 100%, which looks reasonable. I've traced down half of problem: userland CPU consumption to lock contention at "sys/netinet/tcp_usrreq.c:923": inp =3D sotoinpcb(so); KASSERT(inp !=3D NULL, ("tcp_usr_send: inp =3D=3D NULL")); ********INP_WLOCK(inp);******** if (inp->inp_flags & (INP_TIMEWAIT | INP_DROPPED)) { This line consumes 75% of all time consumed by sosend(), and, effectively, by userland, via this call chain: kernel`sosend+0x79 kernel`soo_write+0x6b kernel`fo_write+0x4a kernel`dofilewrite+0xcd kernel`kern_writev+0x79 kernel`sys_write+0x8f 75% of one core is consumed by this line. Unfortunately, other party of this contention is not so obvious. Flame graph without TCO could be found here: http://lev.serebryakov.spb.ru/_sklad/gif-stacks/no-tco/gif.1280.nuttcp.s= end.no-tco.svg It looks very suspicious to me. BTW, if_gre has exactly same problem. --=20 // Lev Serebryakov --3qQE843I85WSOce41UXqygxSapGYHyerT-- --LPSH1QUfrB0Vb7nNGnUCTBKrbYxLyGVEh Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQKTBAEBCgB9FiEE+W0coLX0MYtnSzMK6rA8WL/cR48FAlvQio1fFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldEY5 NkQxQ0EwQjVGNDMxOEI2NzRCMzMwQUVBQjAzQzU4QkZEQzQ3OEYACgkQ6rA8WL/c R49tEA/+JWDnBoNhcxpEWSzxW8iuvJUScaomO1Vm/rBAI9W1Ty3FKMpm2deQiQqB RuAGKJFvEtFiJrTKhox55Cs13n0tAP/+epLqr3up7j9y8Yek9hFGPIz8Vg6Cqv0W fXSqqjrdg0fHZO7dYNGYNWTv9pFhgYYr+ArqIGwRW1L99n1PnjLXwDMKfqODrpDS WUSEHcjDDK1JVV69KFRkaFFpCUI8usaHleymXSBem4MhvU0LZQdIkU8Elf6AIQAE qJ4wyiyn2hv6ZrDuqzEEdF1AvbKClKnvGJxfLYos1U7yCFHkKLgLEfS4bx1HdQ9C D9iyRzGSLB1eTdWModOIugzrUgYcYZMOmKbhGMqiyOi+POjH68BQY36q4K8JEd4X 4RIqHuV2uENLWgVASDyIFXqEIVPzu8R/P44ajJxOsrfsSIW4WNrSoEmsgt9SSUmR /JGN4FxZfIJ5MJ/IyfcZjBSCBW6uDN/LsdhME9GyytkEONiCC3L8PEk8Gok2sgQp kIWhnpteS2QCIhE7jLt/bvhpi40TMBJaOj1oq7GZnD4w8C1eE0CvGNWkBb52UJDW Xb4kT4XXyCXUPMfxH3T25XS5Wo/H+XrhsdJa1/MRqS0pxBT7F6va9b6WaCsaftyU 9mN6mQp4Z4V8mNh6JQzZgIi95LYAIou4bCqbad3ugk8T+69a0pg= =KcLL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --LPSH1QUfrB0Vb7nNGnUCTBKrbYxLyGVEh-- From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Oct 24 17:32:37 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB8C5FFE68B for ; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 17:32:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47D2070784 for ; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 17:32:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 0D7CAFFE68A; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 17:32:37 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0A39FFE689 for ; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 17:32:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 87DCC70771 for ; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 17:32:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 92134BA3E for ; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 17:32:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w9OHWZ4b081027 for ; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 17:32:35 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from bugzilla@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id w9OHWZME081026 for net@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 17:32:35 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: bugzilla set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 227654] Reproducible crash with lagg+vlan+em Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 17:32:35 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: crash X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: commit-hook@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: kp@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: mfc-stable11? mfc-stable12? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 17:32:37 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D227654 --- Comment #11 from commit-hook@freebsd.org --- A commit references this bug: Author: kp Date: Wed Oct 24 17:32:31 UTC 2018 New revision: 339690 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/339690 Log: MFC r339547: vlan: Fix panic with lagg and vlan vlan_lladdr_fn() is called from taskqueue, which means there's no vnet context set. We can end up trying to send ARP messages (through the iflladdr_event event), which requires a vnet context. PR: 227654 Approved by: re (kib) Changes: _U stable/12/ stable/12/sys/net/if_vlan.c --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Oct 24 17:51:20 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC871FFEE93; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 17:51:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [96.47.72.132]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8377F71306; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 17:51:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id 554969405; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 17:51:20 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 17:51:20 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Warner Losh Cc: Ian Lepore , michelle@sorbs.net, FreeBSD-STABLE Mailing List , FreeBSD Net , "freebsd-arch@freebsd.org" , freebsd-fcp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FCP-0101: Deprecating most 10/100 Ethernet drivers Message-ID: <20181024175120.GA9818@FreeBSD.org> References: <20181003210516.GA71565@spindle.one-eyed-alien.net> <55a44e73-60ab-e386-360a-b0a0198a0e71@zyxst.net> <8878cac1-d5d2-4224-6aa5-85516db23c14@sorbs.net> <1538673997.14264.9.camel@freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 17:51:21 -0000 On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 11:38:46AM -0600, Warner Losh wrote: > ... > I'd also suggest that rl stands in stark contrast to the cs, wb, sn, smc, > sf, tl, tx and vr drivers, which nobody has mentioned in this thread, and > which I doubt are in use in any FreeBSD system of any age today. Warner, I had mentioned [*] that I'm using sf(4), would you please be more careful when collecting "NICs still in use" data? We really do need a wiki page and carefully relect all the feedback we've received so far and also upcoming one. ./danfe [*] Message-ID: <20181004084411.GA50348@FreeBSD.org> From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Oct 24 18:12:26 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67662FFFFB4; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 18:12:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jmg@gold.funkthat.com) Received: from gold.funkthat.com (gate2.funkthat.com [208.87.223.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "gate2.funkthat.com", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E3BE672FAA; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 18:12:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jmg@gold.funkthat.com) Received: from gold.funkthat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gold.funkthat.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id w9OICHVN021010 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 24 Oct 2018 11:12:18 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jmg@gold.funkthat.com) Received: (from jmg@localhost) by gold.funkthat.com (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id w9OICHe2021009; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 11:12:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jmg) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 11:12:17 -0700 From: John-Mark Gurney To: "Rodney W. Grimes" Cc: FreeBSD-STABLE Mailing List , FreeBSD Net , "freebsd-arch@freebsd.org" , freebsd-fcp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FCP-0101: Deprecating most 10/100 Ethernet drivers Message-ID: <20181024181217.GC75530@funkthat.com> Mail-Followup-To: "Rodney W. Grimes" , FreeBSD-STABLE Mailing List , FreeBSD Net , "freebsd-arch@freebsd.org" , freebsd-fcp@freebsd.org References: <9257C84A-CA7C-42B9-9AD8-89AE33C96356@gid.co.uk> <201810241219.w9OCJXTd027720@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201810241219.w9OCJXTd027720@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 11.0-RELEASE-p7 amd64 X-PGP-Fingerprint: D87A 235F FB71 1F3F 55B7 ED9B D5FF 5A51 C0AC 3D65 X-Files: The truth is out there X-URL: https://www.funkthat.com/ X-Resume: https://www.funkthat.com/~jmg/resume.html X-TipJar: bitcoin:13Qmb6AeTgQecazTWph4XasEsP7nGRbAPE X-to-the-FBI-CIA-and-NSA: HI! HOW YA DOIN? can i haz chizburger? User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27) X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (gold.funkthat.com [127.0.0.1]); Wed, 24 Oct 2018 11:12:18 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 18:12:26 -0000 Rodney W. Grimes wrote this message on Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 05:19 -0700: > And I have read case law that boiled down to the presents vs absence > of a comma in an agreement that had results far beyond "minor". For those currious about this case: https://www.bostonglobe.com/business/2017/03/16/lack-oxford-comma-costs-maine-company-millions-overtime-dispute/BIxK837fA2C06qavQMDs5J/story.html -- John-Mark Gurney Voice: +1 415 225 5579 "All that I will do, has been done, All that I have, has not." From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Oct 24 18:20:20 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B739C1008691 for ; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 18:20:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 521CD73787 for ; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 18:20:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 146391008690; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 18:20:20 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03330100868F for ; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 18:20:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 96DC67377D for ; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 18:20:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C789AC181 for ; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 18:20:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w9OIKIOZ070291 for ; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 18:20:18 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from bugzilla@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id w9OIKIgw070281 for net@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 18:20:18 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: bugzilla set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 227654] Reproducible crash with lagg+vlan+em Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 18:20:18 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: crash X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: commit-hook@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: kp@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: mfc-stable11? mfc-stable12? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 18:20:20 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D227654 --- Comment #12 from commit-hook@freebsd.org --- A commit references this bug: Author: kp Date: Wed Oct 24 18:19:32 UTC 2018 New revision: 339691 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/339691 Log: MFC r339547: vlan: Fix panic with lagg and vlan vlan_lladdr_fn() is called from taskqueue, which means there's no vnet context set. We can end up trying to send ARP messages (through the iflladdr_event event), which requires a vnet context. PR: 227654 Changes: _U stable/11/ stable/11/sys/net/if_vlan.c --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Oct 24 18:22:09 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DB4010087A4 for ; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 18:22:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36CCE7398B for ; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 18:22:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id F078B1008794; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 18:22:08 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF62D1008792 for ; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 18:22:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7941E7397C for ; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 18:22:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 98CBCC2C1 for ; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 18:22:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w9OIM7rF013632 for ; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 18:22:07 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id w9OIM7l5013624 for net@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 18:22:07 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 227654] Reproducible crash with lagg+vlan+em Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 18:22:07 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: crash X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: kp@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: kp@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: mfc-stable11+ mfc-stable12+ X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: resolution bug_status flagtypes.name Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 18:22:09 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D227654 Kristof Provost changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|In Progress |Closed Flags|mfc-stable11?, |mfc-stable11+, |mfc-stable12? |mfc-stable12+ --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Oct 24 15:48:59 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF2E7FF1AC0; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 15:48:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brooks@spindle.one-eyed-alien.net) Received: from spindle.one-eyed-alien.net (spindle.one-eyed-alien.net [199.48.129.229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 74BD66A814; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 15:48:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brooks@spindle.one-eyed-alien.net) Received: by spindle.one-eyed-alien.net (Postfix, from userid 3001) id CAEC53C475F; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 15:48:57 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 15:48:57 +0000 From: Brooks Davis To: "Rodney W. Grimes" Cc: Mark Linimon , Bob Bishop , FreeBSD-STABLE Mailing List , Ian Lepore , FreeBSD Net , "Julian H. Stacey" , Michelle Sullivan , "freebsd-arch@freebsd.org" , freebsd-fcp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FCP-0101: Deprecating most 10/100 Ethernet drivers Message-ID: <20181024154857.GB15429@spindle.one-eyed-alien.net> References: <20181024134153.GC3125@lonesome.com> <201810241354.w9ODs1MD028342@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="GID0FwUMdk1T2AWN" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201810241354.w9ODs1MD028342@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 19:03:58 +0000 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 15:49:00 -0000 --GID0FwUMdk1T2AWN Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 06:54:01AM -0700, Rodney W. Grimes wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 05:19:33AM -0700, Rodney W. Grimes wrote: > > > And I have read case law that boiled down to the presents vs absence > > > of a comma > >=20 > > If we are now going to evaluate all proposed changes to FreeBSD on the > > same rigid principles as the US legal system, I'm done. >=20 > I do not think "all" is in scope here, > but I do feel should excercise care about procedure. > And FYI, the case law above I am pretty sure was not US. >=20 > I also believe that what is at issue here can be fixed > rather easily without ever going down the minor vs major > slippery slope by some rather simple changes to order > of events and careful steps. >=20 > Warner came very close, I think he just applied his correct > "fix" to 1/2 of the problem. >=20 > There is the stage where the FCP is before core being voted > on, and there is the stage that the FCP has been approved. > He only addressed 1 of those, and he did so by allowing core > to trivially modify the document during the voting process, > and I am actually fine with that idea, its good, it is what > should be allowed. I trust core to know what is minor vs > major. >=20 > BUTT it still does not cover the issue of the author/submitter > modifying the document while it is in core being reviewed and > possibly modified. I have issue with that. It is very hard > to vote/formally review on something that is fluid. > I have not been asked to trust these people with the trust I > give core, so I would like to remove that. There are technical measures in place that do much of this already. Right now, authors can't directly change the documents (unless they are repo admins which means core and former core members in practice). We require that pull requests be reviewed before they are merged and random people don't have commit access. We could make the restriction to core members or core members and fcp-editors explicit if that was desirable. > We could add that once the document is submitted to core > any change to it between submitting and vote by core requires > core to be involved, even if it is simply an ack of a change > has been made to what was submitted. I agree. We'll need to think on how best to do this. -- Brooks --GID0FwUMdk1T2AWN Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJb0JRpAAoJEKzQXbSebgfAv6EH/j7y74E12k7JrbntothAjhfl 1u1bRpib5ZoIE5nCeCS6l+ZqHvkJIxvmbqm9ksBsLG36GFbUOBHMnvY43KCHq87r NOQ4LoncmDljiDnakMALcf7qyMiWLjHBxod0AtUrBE+Wof9qB/kiJ3MWmt6ou11W nuXhhiJsxR4bTAFoBlP+91X0BgcNomUyQLX537hEzgw4jI7lfp3liw00T9enWAV+ NAU9smJhXuUPca2hAcDtcPkpQG3tVweQKLGSWrr9HDxb2FQUNZVHzwccEJwg1sc3 LgUvjJfrOArCUvaZLzopgbMBuZbx/vnJSEqQySnRihEk00JYR42mp7iqNv22DRc= =Pfsi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --GID0FwUMdk1T2AWN-- From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Oct 24 19:04:29 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F34811036C72; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 19:04:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net) Received: from pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net (br1.CN84in.dnsmgr.net [69.59.192.140]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A0E4756A8; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 19:04:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net) Received: from pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id w9OJ4Qcb030115; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 12:04:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net) Received: (from freebsd-rwg@localhost) by pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id w9OJ4Q1Z030114; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 12:04:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg) From: "Rodney W. Grimes" Message-Id: <201810241904.w9OJ4Q1Z030114@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net> Subject: Re: FCP-0101: Deprecating most 10/100 Ethernet drivers In-Reply-To: <20181024181217.GC75530@funkthat.com> To: John-Mark Gurney Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 12:04:26 -0700 (PDT) CC: FreeBSD-STABLE Mailing List , FreeBSD Net , "freebsd-arch@freebsd.org" , freebsd-fcp@freebsd.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL121h (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 19:04:29 -0000 > Rodney W. Grimes wrote this message on Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 05:19 -0700: > > And I have read case law that boiled down to the presents vs absence > > of a comma in an agreement that had results far beyond "minor". > > For those currious about this case: > https://www.bostonglobe.com/business/2017/03/16/lack-oxford-comma-costs-maine-company-millions-overtime-dispute/BIxK837fA2C06qavQMDs5J/story.html For those more interested: https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca1/16-1901/16-1901-2017-03-13.html And I was wrong, it is a US case, though I am sure there is other similiar case law on other books. -- Rod Grimes rgrimes@freebsd.org From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Oct 24 20:10:23 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 668DC10397C7 for ; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 20:10:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com) Received: from mail-wm1-x332.google.com (mail-wm1-x332.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::332]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E329777CB7 for ; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 20:10:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com) Received: by mail-wm1-x332.google.com with SMTP id r63-v6so6686260wma.4 for ; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 13:10:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cumulusnetworks.com; s=google; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=cQmAaACnr4EgVFusjnVnliYRcC9483nlGlMS1d7H4Rc=; b=LBK0J9H7Zvd5otsRah2N1DJIN9OtQYaWO/DYrynAwNccjYvriGivrIr8sZPdcditJJ x8Lo3gdkjFk4fS4riIIcbUEOA/F8FEtw5A0JBRqsPeVjEjuq7aCs71fTiCflb86mJxqk dsYlR+asL04MY+DKVCV/NVxC42zdEIZFbI30U= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=cQmAaACnr4EgVFusjnVnliYRcC9483nlGlMS1d7H4Rc=; b=eMvcuuBnuPp/+qLoY2IDeTw6k7diINC4dWq1Xaf1JI7Uz+wN5kaLd07S/QcxcoWOSb Z7DRSGdudilxEjCpSKsM8xcuGqb7ET2f/qCuoATfdcDxw/xjE3dgvhfBeVucEkoqUIQ4 RG7lBR+XfS9mF1+jbbJeztALUm5hjRS+m8MDpOATQBfwPTTJ95iaVbjya8fSDKlqcqlf 6QwQiTjGoKx5tYlGU4EXtxykAAEtyAxCkMW261XABrKn+79xT2Aq0nL5z6xO7oAvYsCn jPvdxN8XnE8GxIyK27ulgtjvXFF6/YlGdCslsbbadao+kzOk7/aTaH9rvRPl+8gJXLAE hO/A== X-Gm-Message-State: AGRZ1gJGd4YrRANh6UvnqMRbcPDACVvlghBeQwMTPic6Oae/SLIm+7iJ 3i59tWR+DmeVQvr2T5VWsx8cRzUROF2XJGpGra2qjtkp X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5czdIWZUjFchTOhCN4yXPajMWiebX1AqwUmNEvNXUH2gf5plfSsCU1+rJB7Er7htkIHrYxJeOTmM08yk+zLRus= X-Received: by 2002:a1c:aa05:: with SMTP id t5-v6mr4362555wme.71.1540411821147; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 13:10:21 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Donald Sharp Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 16:10:10 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: RFC 5549? To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 20:10:23 -0000 All - The FRRouting project has some basic support for rfc 5549 and I've been asked to see if it is possible to get this bit of code working with the FRRouting freebsd kernel interface. What is RFC 5549 you ask? The tl;dr of it is that you have v4 prefixes w/ a v6 gateway. For some more background the linux implementation cheats ( and I would like to emphatically point out that I'm not suggesting this solution, I'm giving the linux solution to the problem as a data point to how it was solved in one instance ) by installing a neighbor entry for `169.254.0.1 ` and when installing the v4 prefix we see the v6 nexthop and replace it with `169.254.0.1 ` in the netlink message to the kernel. Is support of RFC 5549 possible in Freebsd? thanks! donald From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu Oct 25 00:08:59 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B0D910748ED for ; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 00:08:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19533806B7 for ; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 00:08:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id D1E8010748EC; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 00:08:58 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEED310748EB for ; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 00:08:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4472F806B6 for ; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 00:08:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 83730F216 for ; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 00:08:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w9P08vIq005082 for ; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 00:08:57 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id w9P08vkk005073 for net@FreeBSD.org; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 00:08:57 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 226289] [igb] [netmap] Kernel NIC Driver conflict Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2018 00:08:57 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.1-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: wings1446@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2018 00:08:59 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D226289 wings1446@gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |wings1446@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from wings1446@gmail.com --- This is still occurring in FreeBSD 11.2-RELEASE-p3. Please see the followi= ng URL on the FreeBSD support forum:=20 https://forums.freebsd.org/threads/intel-ethernet-adapter-with-intel-82580-= controller.67988/. Can someone please take a look. Thank you. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu Oct 25 00:54:00 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 668351075543 for ; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 00:54:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03FD881A23 for ; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 00:54:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id BC8D61075541; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 00:53:59 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB58E107553E for ; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 00:53:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DA9081A22 for ; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 00:53:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6BD73F914 for ; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 00:53:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w9P0rwoX042415 for ; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 00:53:58 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id w9P0rwsn042413 for net@FreeBSD.org; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 00:53:58 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 226289] [igb] [netmap] Kernel NIC Driver conflict Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2018 00:53:58 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.1-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: erj@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2018 00:54:00 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D226289 Eric Joyner changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |erj@freebsd.org --- Comment #2 from Eric Joyner --- (In reply to wings1446 from comment #1) Are you using jumbo frames? --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu Oct 25 01:21:24 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E95B1076F2B for ; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 01:21:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hegui_you@126.com) Received: from n6.nabble.com (n6.nabble.com [162.255.23.37]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 460348373F for ; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 01:21:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hegui_you@126.com) Received: from n6.nabble.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by n6.nabble.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63668A2C0552 for ; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 18:21:16 -0700 (MST) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 18:21:16 -0700 (MST) From: star To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Message-ID: <1540430476372-0.post@n6.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: References: <4D78A8B3.6010901@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: IP_BINDANY: return packets not accepted by kernel MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2018 01:21:24 -0000 Hello, I have the same problem with you, according to your method, I still can not be accepted by the kernel. -- Sent from: http://freebsd.1045724.x6.nabble.com/freebsd-net-f4005075.html From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu Oct 25 01:22:45 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B177D10770FE for ; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 01:22:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F91183906 for ; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 01:22:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 12C2810770FC; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 01:22:45 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3FAA10770FB for ; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 01:22:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 968AE83902 for ; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 01:22:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CD20FFD22 for ; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 01:22:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w9P1MhoF029104 for ; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 01:22:43 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id w9P1Mhr4029103 for net@FreeBSD.org; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 01:22:43 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 226289] [igb] [netmap] Kernel NIC Driver conflict Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2018 01:22:43 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.1-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: wings1446@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2018 01:22:45 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D226289 --- Comment #3 from wings1446@gmail.com --- (In reply to Eric Joyner from comment #2) I'm not using jumbo frames at the moment. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu Oct 25 01:39:18 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D08810779F3 for ; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 01:39:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hegui_you@126.com) Received: from n6.nabble.com (n6.nabble.com [162.255.23.37]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 144F984062 for ; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 01:39:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hegui_you@126.com) Received: from n6.nabble.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by n6.nabble.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65F9CA2C1057 for ; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 18:39:17 -0700 (MST) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 18:39:17 -0700 (MST) From: star To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Message-ID: <1540431557414-0.post@n6.nabble.com> Subject: IP_BINDANY(SYN_SENT ): return packets not accepted by kernel MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2018 01:39:18 -0000 Hello all, I am testing IP_BINDANY functionality with a small C program. I can bind to a foreign (non existing) address, and syn packets are being sent with the bound source IP address and port. Return (ACK) packets are reaching the host (I can see the SYN-ACK packet in tcpdump), but the third packet in TCP handshake is not getting generated. It looks like the second SYN-ACK is not getting accepted by the kernel. My ipfw: root@bsd:~ # ipfw list 00100 fwd 127.0.0.1,3128 tcp from any to any 80 in recv igb1 00300 fwd 127.0.0.1 ip from any to any uid 0 in recv igb0 65534 allow ip from any to any 65535 deny ip from any to any Refer to other pages: http://freebsd.1045724.x6.nabble.com/IP-BINDANY-return-packets-not-accepted-by-kernel-td4017905.html but not work! can anybody help me? Thanks -- Sent from: http://freebsd.1045724.x6.nabble.com/freebsd-net-f4005075.html From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu Oct 25 03:13:32 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7796F107E270 for ; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 03:13:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 153A36B00E for ; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 03:13:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id CE74E107E26F; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 03:13:31 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD19D107E26E for ; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 03:13:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F0286B00A for ; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 03:13:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A70FE10C5D for ; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 03:13:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w9P3DUDl096466 for ; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 03:13:30 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id w9P3DU3N096460 for net@FreeBSD.org; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 03:13:30 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 226289] [igb] [netmap] Kernel NIC Driver conflict Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2018 03:13:30 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.2-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: rgrimes@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: version cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2018 03:13:32 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D226289 Rodney W. Grimes changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|11.1-RELEASE |11.2-RELEASE CC| |rgrimes@FreeBSD.org --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu Oct 25 03:16:30 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E529107E5A3 for ; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 03:16:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D06CF6B257 for ; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 03:16:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 95AFC107E5A2; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 03:16:29 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84B3F107E5A1 for ; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 03:16:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 256756B24A for ; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 03:16:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C7B810C64 for ; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 03:16:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w9P3GSJH071857 for ; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 03:16:28 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id w9P3GSAZ071848 for net@FreeBSD.org; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 03:16:28 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 226289] [igb] [netmap] Kernel NIC Driver conflict Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2018 03:16:27 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.2-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: rgrimes@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2018 03:16:30 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D226289 Rodney W. Grimes changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |vmaffione@FreeBSD.org --- Comment #4 from Rodney W. Grimes --- Adding vmaffione@FreeBSD.org, to cc: list as the netmap expert. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu Oct 25 11:52:58 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEC7C10719B1 for ; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 11:52:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A0CE7DDD4 for ; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 11:52:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 4D38810719A6; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 11:52:57 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B6B910719A4 for ; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 11:52:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF28D7DDD1 for ; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 11:52:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E8FE15431 for ; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 11:52:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w9PBqtWV043667 for ; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 11:52:55 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id w9PBqtks043666 for net@FreeBSD.org; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 11:52:55 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 218579] Wake on Lan doesn't work for bge NIC driver Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2018 11:52:56 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.2-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-qa, patch, regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: bourmg@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: cy@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: mfc-stable10? mfc-stable11? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2018 11:52:58 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D218579 George B changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bourmg@gmail.com --- Comment #14 from George B --- I had 11.1 patched with https://github.com/NamTaf/if_bge_wol and it worked= =20 can I apply the same patch on 11.2 p4 ? I only need this for WOL. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Oct 26 08:12:49 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84FD010DB118 for ; Fri, 26 Oct 2018 08:12:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.muenz@spam-fetish.org) Received: from mailout-02.maxonline.de (mailout-02.maxonline.de [81.24.66.23]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 255526BEC5 for ; Fri, 26 Oct 2018 08:12:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.muenz@spam-fetish.org) Received: from web03-01.max-it.de (web03-01.max-it.de [81.24.64.215]) by mailout-02.maxonline.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6096C2A6 for ; Fri, 26 Oct 2018 10:12:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by web03-01.max-it.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5562A28B84C for ; Fri, 26 Oct 2018 10:12:40 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at web03-01.max-it.de Received: from web03-01.max-it.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (web03-01.max-it.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id 9U_o4PZVv4Oi for ; Fri, 26 Oct 2018 10:12:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [81.24.66.132] (unknown [81.24.66.132]) (Authenticated sender: m.muenz@spam-fetish.org) by web03-01.max-it.de (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 2AE1E28B84A for ; Fri, 26 Oct 2018 10:12:40 +0200 (CEST) To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org From: "Muenz, Michael" Subject: ipfw: PRIO scheduler Message-ID: Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2018 10:12:40 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2018 08:12:49 -0000 Hi, On my FreeBSD system I always see : load_dn_sched dn_sched PRIO loaded I tried to gather some informations about this scheduler cause I never heard of, but all I can find is an old thread about a kernel panic. Also no information via man page, but I can successfully add a pipe with a PRIO scheduler. Anyone here with some bits of knowledge what happened to this scheduler and if it's for production use? For me it sounds like a hard priority queue where everything else will starve (when congested). Thanks! Michael From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Oct 26 11:53:38 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8BF810E0C2F for ; Fri, 26 Oct 2018 11:53:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76191740DE for ; Fri, 26 Oct 2018 11:53:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 3BF1F10E0C2A; Fri, 26 Oct 2018 11:53:38 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AF6010E0C29 for ; Fri, 26 Oct 2018 11:53:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C0EB3740D2 for ; Fri, 26 Oct 2018 11:53:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 05B4D1A42 for ; Fri, 26 Oct 2018 11:53:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w9QBra7i037476 for ; Fri, 26 Oct 2018 11:53:36 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id w9QBra1f037475 for net@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 26 Oct 2018 11:53:36 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 232708] Wake on LAN doesn't work for any of my NIC cards (em0, bge0) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2018 11:53:36 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.2-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: linimon@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: keywords short_desc assigned_to Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2018 11:53:39 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D232708 Mark Linimon changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |regression Summary|Wake on LAN doesn't work |Wake on LAN doesn't work |for any of my NIC cards |for any of my NIC cards | |(em0, bge0) Assignee|bugs@FreeBSD.org |net@FreeBSD.org --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Oct 26 12:30:38 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CA2F10E2575 for ; Fri, 26 Oct 2018 12:30:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lev@FreeBSD.org) Received: from onlyone.not-for.work (onlyone.not-for.work [IPv6:2a01:4f8:201:6350::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 288A6754A8 for ; Fri, 26 Oct 2018 12:30:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lev@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [192.168.23.186] (unknown [89.113.128.32]) (Authenticated sender: lev@serebryakov.spb.ru) by onlyone.not-for.work (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D0BBE312 for ; Fri, 26 Oct 2018 15:30:36 +0300 (MSK) To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Reply-To: lev@FreeBSD.org From: Lev Serebryakov Subject: What are conditions to spread traffic across different NIC queues? Openpgp: preference=signencrypt Autocrypt: addr=lev@FreeBSD.org; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= xsFNBFKbGksBEADeguVs+XyJc3mL3iiOBqDd16wSk97YTJYOi4VsHsINzJr09oFvNDiaDBIi fLn2p8XcJvehcsF2GSgrfXfw+uK4O1jyNIKJmiYA0EtE+ZbRtvDrrE0w6Q8+SDeKA21SWh3Y vSQ0DJUontbgW55ER2CbEiIUTIn34uQ0kmESAaw/v5p/9ue8yPTmURvv130FqPFz8VPzltqL NxyGt54TxPfKAzAHEIwxlEZ63JOwzloKh1UDBExcsf9nJO08/TAVgR5UZ5njFBPzaaquhRoP qPJLEQQDqxPIlvMNtHKf7iIebE4BHeqgCdJA0BoiR6gpa0wlsZtdrTPK3n4wYSphLvGbhfOZ YW/hbcu7HYS/FImkVxB3iY17kcC1UTnx4ZaYeASPBGOOPbXky1lLfmDGWIFT//70yx+G17qD OZzF1SvJJhGvh6ilFYaWMX7T+nIp6Mcafc4D7AakXM+XdubNXOMlCJhzPcZ0skgAEnYV587w V7em5fDVwQccwvtfezzqKeJAU5TGiywBHSR5Svzk2FwRNf6M//hWkpq0SRR63iOhkHGOAEBi 69GfEIwH2/w24rLxP0E+Hqq8n+EWNkPatw1Mhcl5PKkdvGCjJUaGNMkpBffjyYo254JXRscR eEnwdIkJt4ErDvjb2/UrOFq31wWMOiLzJeVchAgvTHBMRfP9aQARAQABzShMZXYgU2VyZWJy eWFrb3YgPGxldkBzZXJlYnJ5YWtvdi5zcGIucnU+wsGCBBMBCAAsAhsDBwsJCAcDAgEGFQgC CQoLBBYCAwECHgECF4ACGQEFAlKbP8wFCQlmJwEACgkQ6rA8WL/cR4/6VBAAjRMyyX3PBFx/ HxyiIZ698EfwlWUua8Ft4crtrdK52m0qNkbBB9BH8xQgBHG32A1CwyzQnzxHgZuoOWMjh+Qq WJv7dmpM/q/c1GCJHhlPgewXrciTwpAamZILN071u+1GCPWwGRPzfQ/U+k63KJWx9ozf4doM WTTom6Cqcssi4J1u5kkt52a5ZRhsCK9pEVGilk36XTP9BakGrnMSIxF/NK4xeZVX2q+Nuqvf RchyofKXVgLEDLwb1cd/baLtBpDzy0PTN2Zl2lX4kOA6jwTKsqRya9A1Vui1KXwPh2XViTQ1 7Y3l5qg/M+sR73DohezP6bO6huOnLhty17jAqHPNlD6RonDo+j8uIlEg4iMSTN3MhzkBAu0Q pe3ucQ0o1767JiXN3fsNvRzSFhLVNDqPLce4uKlMogsbreXWvdgHGTN1ybOHGbybZnP77yHz uNBacbmG3vL/OLXMqwLdL2JXoiec4DmXjjCdhTBl5xLV9Hz/6VWKqElteg8QFVvHB3tHWzJ4 /rpiVEixytCIII6DS33BXZ0h2EOkK/6AYA2SJxy1vgOH4SZBtDBHoezmHV2nFnq5O0c7AuAB 7WPWgQG0sEwHQPZmg/baRGitRJnaxf/Gvf1DeD1x1VrcoVke2vwBcgDM3kugP8L9hsqic2D3 dI+gP76haeuvNNZr3y9L9zvOwU0EUpsaSwEQALRr3B+OjY/cnJPstz5CVsVWyEZtJtrNviZr tBgbkhlkPm98sEWR4+gbpyeufdYJengDjeGzMDKcLB7h5fICS/j6A8XdlJ40TlbPfNgb6OHa ebaIYKTJpXKR9sD7ZyGivYMofm0em40wGUX7BIkdkomaWj+wUiS0CdXU0FWDj9wv73+Eim+X zZyXeFgIPv97v+pET7DfwKkADOfrkW9s4OfvGVjd+wm35wc8EngQEz0qdPBxx74X7vZFAxlA SXu8gDBJGYt2Bkc3QwULnfeXrZJWgqNPR5o44gGu96yaiOFaN/C6CJtev5ZEX+0ZxbvsHHB7 Z5AtsRURKpZ4w5HFHGhzHtDtoAKgeZ/gbhTVXPHvNQR818eN+Nl5BV8BRF/8yhR6VlJb8GYw h8oKDeVGVYC34+raHZQAM9WoBnN7jlt4T9zzPwtmw5mIahGFgvw1KDr7OItN2ZgtZ20UYC5m Go602nmHq0aPbU6SwGi1xohrliNsKaaciYiMaVIGRQq8iGr9Fe2HlvaA3BpB275i/gCVlUdG y5XLAv+yQMUvn5Z7XVsMroxDk/O+ae1ElyBvKiKyfWGJXTg5XUukkkyQmfWPxWUGoNA1P/P4 GMHSu7/Rqe/7m4uPu/RyTTqsSjjKJdP9kBwEzvqPtXsVoZuShtrptRQJDYflhgE4qmKSMKen ABEBAAHCwWUEGAECAA8FAlKbGksCGwwFCRLMAwAACgkQ6rA8WL/cR48RkA//SNzeW3CI8KHx rA0aeHW6Nb5ieoqVRBGLyjBM06RX6vHB9v4dJL6Z+yV2jGN2s+XZX2HILbuTOwcTxGkI3xTT e0cDXVaF5K8R/liigUjtwuC2v/sWgoWyUmK1Cy9CPYdcXmFq6nESfkUe8DYiGOUULdHq5w63 F53yOZ72iXRBQBZgkhPtRFu4lPYIzOsMag9DIJ9CthR1r0ziqU/keb94Qt3l+aXK7CwGdY7X T4zUIMHNYsuAuyX+NJIXfsN68TT6m7QmlUwxPs13nxmoVQzm4ruV+hlQKh1MtbsjWRkNgPxF IPiqoAEhy8QoddlSvRTwL5Z7zFQiwMdiXU7toL8pfzj/zJR1jELXKMipijrt5MLrV8XX3OPN yZZvh95VIl8mv+iAqwSZUufd2EJnvj5TObB0eH+a+34NWf/XqA3fPjE6KHzmdnw9PZjPEjlx JCPECSs+6gse1+GaEfKYuXzB/ENe2ctlcfx5iQJXFc+/+zG/uU/JX/pXJHA12CUfB5g7lH6X BZIHvRo3VTCDjXgbF5xxDAe5V4exf8d4oSNjQIFLYxxN7zkvH89EN6RPfRgsWN7bYArCwfS9 MOgs9pFeCOewR6qieK150aoqNENGfKFXJup+5VVl6I0mU+j0rgVDZDht2/QgP/Tb4lGBe+ai pOGaK/GYNR+Ad6bUmokKsx4= Organization: FreeBSD Message-ID: Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2018 15:30:30 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="mw5zARou40adCGixCJR0wJjYp3C0eL7um" X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2018 12:30:38 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --mw5zARou40adCGixCJR0wJjYp3C0eL7um Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="H60gB5TGsHUFykB42cCMKlMq8qGJMNmZb"; protected-headers="v1" From: Lev Serebryakov Reply-To: lev@FreeBSD.org To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Message-ID: Subject: What are conditions to spread traffic across different NIC queues? --H60gB5TGsHUFykB42cCMKlMq8qGJMNmZb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I have "router" with two em (82574L) NICs. It has dual-core CPU and each NIC creates two receive and two transmit queues: $ sysctl dev.em | grep queue | grep _irq dev.em.1.queue_rx_1.rx_irq: 0 dev.em.1.queue_rx_0.rx_irq: 0 dev.em.1.queue_tx_1.tx_irq: 0 dev.em.1.queue_tx_0.tx_irq: 0 dev.em.0.queue_rx_1.rx_irq: 0 dev.em.0.queue_rx_0.rx_irq: 0 dev.em.0.queue_tx_1.tx_irq: 0 dev.em.0.queue_tx_0.tx_irq: 0 $ When I pass, say, 64 UDP streams through this router, only one core is 100% loaded and other is 100% idle. These streams are for same IP pair, but port pairs are all different. What are right conditions to spread such traffic per queues and cores? --=20 // Lev Serebryakov --H60gB5TGsHUFykB42cCMKlMq8qGJMNmZb-- --mw5zARou40adCGixCJR0wJjYp3C0eL7um Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQKTBAEBCgB9FiEE+W0coLX0MYtnSzMK6rA8WL/cR48FAlvTCOZfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldEY5 NkQxQ0EwQjVGNDMxOEI2NzRCMzMwQUVBQjAzQzU4QkZEQzQ3OEYACgkQ6rA8WL/c R4/3xA//Wzp9mLnQSciQEYdeYjpSapskGjv8jh773UfV1/7Dawn1XIg4PgBfHlcn MNTEU84nWf3i9eR54MYHwvOZ6a7F7BTqdbmAcy3k/S5YsPWu1aztW3fIpI78bO45 m9YjRK9C9S8JMtbT5NVbqrQfTlxjK7l4Vt92zWAV1hw++JeV7ukCBObGqPgnAZEC Q/fIgFb6tMp26htfFba87JMf7n4QNnaCtzQRsYbTeUyEnkgmBmfHoVSjHOc61SPD lhS+KqtWeqA1FDuaLqBqiRRPzZ8cjkZFjkFKBtWfsMPyl51N22GDM/RnQBMebhxn 4Hr0v81zIarVJwHxyM6Vd9fQNy12+V1xhlOfC031SF5GB4ralnzVH1JPQtoM4dVe mr39R4SWlAwMoQon0XqTKYvDbIEYy+55Pc8eoNjPkmc5wk1VMsCteFHcbmOG7ywJ 6mC0rVv1z5MHBGyJY4nSa/ZCXC6oAhk2zL/LmNtvdHFI0O/pVtCGaukcTpz4Z8nw 5uJXldLr4BjJe3/PAfOzgv75V+c5rmLKtiyDLwh75su76xlrTnIgZjx3Lr2Xvlxw eOSd0NlFwCc+eHWVI0r9UYiF+sgqt/ic8+Df8KRHTwzfkjAbsdLFswTEuBWQ6Zp5 iBCbNhmeh+r0JWgUz2GwH5dvv5uzVCBDIbnDjKa30gTQeL6GuuY= =Vkcj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --mw5zARou40adCGixCJR0wJjYp3C0eL7um-- From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Oct 26 12:31:05 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAC3110E2598 for ; Fri, 26 Oct 2018 12:31:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8530575527 for ; Fri, 26 Oct 2018 12:31:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 4605C10E2597; Fri, 26 Oct 2018 12:31:04 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 344BF10E2596 for ; Fri, 26 Oct 2018 12:31:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C7A7375521 for ; Fri, 26 Oct 2018 12:31:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 129651E7C for ; Fri, 26 Oct 2018 12:31:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w9QCV2b3049410 for ; Fri, 26 Oct 2018 12:31:02 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id w9QCV2xJ049402 for net@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 26 Oct 2018 12:31:02 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 232708] Wake on LAN doesn't work for any of my NIC cards (em0, bge0) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2018 12:31:03 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.2-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: zarychtam@plan-b.pwste.edu.pl X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2018 12:31:05 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D232708 Marek Zarychta changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |zarychtam@plan-b.pwste.edu. | |pl --- Comment #1 from Marek Zarychta --- It's not a bug, it's a feature. I assume you have enabled WoL in BIOS/UEFI. The interface should be brought up with one of its WoL capabilities, so in /etc/rc.conf you should have at least : ifconfig_em0=3D"up wol_magic" I got it working with I217-LM, but the machine could be suspended only once, suspending after resume works, but workstation wakes up almost immediately. Next long lasting sleep state is possible after reboot. It's probably anoth= er feature. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Oct 26 13:41:01 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C6EF10E3B97 for ; Fri, 26 Oct 2018 13:41:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED24877BF5 for ; Fri, 26 Oct 2018 13:41:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id B240C10E3B95; Fri, 26 Oct 2018 13:41:00 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A10D610E3B94 for ; Fri, 26 Oct 2018 13:41:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4025E77BF0 for ; Fri, 26 Oct 2018 13:41:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 871102825 for ; Fri, 26 Oct 2018 13:40:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w9QDex7d067315 for ; Fri, 26 Oct 2018 13:40:59 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id w9QDexn1067314 for net@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 26 Oct 2018 13:40:59 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 232708] Wake on LAN doesn't work for any of my NIC cards (em0, bge0) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2018 13:40:59 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.2-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: bourmg@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2018 13:41:01 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D232708 --- Comment #2 from George B --- Thanks for the reply, (In reply to Marek Zarychta from comment #1) I've had this Kit for over 4 years now so yes WoL is BIOS enabled. I have already tried bringing up WOL capabilities on boot but that is not t= he problem I think. It seems that the option is missing... altogether=20 In 11.1 I even had bge0 working thanks to this https://github.com/NamTaf/if_bge_wol patch. No luck so far with 11.2 --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Oct 26 14:11:41 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8792F10E86C7 for ; Fri, 26 Oct 2018 14:11:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lev@FreeBSD.org) Received: from onlyone.not-for.work (onlyone.not-for.work [148.251.9.81]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12CD179174 for ; Fri, 26 Oct 2018 14:11:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lev@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [192.168.23.186] (unknown [89.113.128.32]) (Authenticated sender: lev@serebryakov.spb.ru) by onlyone.not-for.work (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E011C34C for ; Fri, 26 Oct 2018 17:11:33 +0300 (MSK) Reply-To: lev@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: What are conditions to spread traffic across different NIC queues? From: Lev Serebryakov To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org References: Openpgp: preference=signencrypt Autocrypt: addr=lev@FreeBSD.org; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= xsFNBFKbGksBEADeguVs+XyJc3mL3iiOBqDd16wSk97YTJYOi4VsHsINzJr09oFvNDiaDBIi fLn2p8XcJvehcsF2GSgrfXfw+uK4O1jyNIKJmiYA0EtE+ZbRtvDrrE0w6Q8+SDeKA21SWh3Y vSQ0DJUontbgW55ER2CbEiIUTIn34uQ0kmESAaw/v5p/9ue8yPTmURvv130FqPFz8VPzltqL NxyGt54TxPfKAzAHEIwxlEZ63JOwzloKh1UDBExcsf9nJO08/TAVgR5UZ5njFBPzaaquhRoP qPJLEQQDqxPIlvMNtHKf7iIebE4BHeqgCdJA0BoiR6gpa0wlsZtdrTPK3n4wYSphLvGbhfOZ YW/hbcu7HYS/FImkVxB3iY17kcC1UTnx4ZaYeASPBGOOPbXky1lLfmDGWIFT//70yx+G17qD OZzF1SvJJhGvh6ilFYaWMX7T+nIp6Mcafc4D7AakXM+XdubNXOMlCJhzPcZ0skgAEnYV587w V7em5fDVwQccwvtfezzqKeJAU5TGiywBHSR5Svzk2FwRNf6M//hWkpq0SRR63iOhkHGOAEBi 69GfEIwH2/w24rLxP0E+Hqq8n+EWNkPatw1Mhcl5PKkdvGCjJUaGNMkpBffjyYo254JXRscR eEnwdIkJt4ErDvjb2/UrOFq31wWMOiLzJeVchAgvTHBMRfP9aQARAQABzShMZXYgU2VyZWJy eWFrb3YgPGxldkBzZXJlYnJ5YWtvdi5zcGIucnU+wsGCBBMBCAAsAhsDBwsJCAcDAgEGFQgC CQoLBBYCAwECHgECF4ACGQEFAlKbP8wFCQlmJwEACgkQ6rA8WL/cR4/6VBAAjRMyyX3PBFx/ HxyiIZ698EfwlWUua8Ft4crtrdK52m0qNkbBB9BH8xQgBHG32A1CwyzQnzxHgZuoOWMjh+Qq WJv7dmpM/q/c1GCJHhlPgewXrciTwpAamZILN071u+1GCPWwGRPzfQ/U+k63KJWx9ozf4doM WTTom6Cqcssi4J1u5kkt52a5ZRhsCK9pEVGilk36XTP9BakGrnMSIxF/NK4xeZVX2q+Nuqvf RchyofKXVgLEDLwb1cd/baLtBpDzy0PTN2Zl2lX4kOA6jwTKsqRya9A1Vui1KXwPh2XViTQ1 7Y3l5qg/M+sR73DohezP6bO6huOnLhty17jAqHPNlD6RonDo+j8uIlEg4iMSTN3MhzkBAu0Q pe3ucQ0o1767JiXN3fsNvRzSFhLVNDqPLce4uKlMogsbreXWvdgHGTN1ybOHGbybZnP77yHz uNBacbmG3vL/OLXMqwLdL2JXoiec4DmXjjCdhTBl5xLV9Hz/6VWKqElteg8QFVvHB3tHWzJ4 /rpiVEixytCIII6DS33BXZ0h2EOkK/6AYA2SJxy1vgOH4SZBtDBHoezmHV2nFnq5O0c7AuAB 7WPWgQG0sEwHQPZmg/baRGitRJnaxf/Gvf1DeD1x1VrcoVke2vwBcgDM3kugP8L9hsqic2D3 dI+gP76haeuvNNZr3y9L9zvOwU0EUpsaSwEQALRr3B+OjY/cnJPstz5CVsVWyEZtJtrNviZr tBgbkhlkPm98sEWR4+gbpyeufdYJengDjeGzMDKcLB7h5fICS/j6A8XdlJ40TlbPfNgb6OHa ebaIYKTJpXKR9sD7ZyGivYMofm0em40wGUX7BIkdkomaWj+wUiS0CdXU0FWDj9wv73+Eim+X zZyXeFgIPv97v+pET7DfwKkADOfrkW9s4OfvGVjd+wm35wc8EngQEz0qdPBxx74X7vZFAxlA SXu8gDBJGYt2Bkc3QwULnfeXrZJWgqNPR5o44gGu96yaiOFaN/C6CJtev5ZEX+0ZxbvsHHB7 Z5AtsRURKpZ4w5HFHGhzHtDtoAKgeZ/gbhTVXPHvNQR818eN+Nl5BV8BRF/8yhR6VlJb8GYw h8oKDeVGVYC34+raHZQAM9WoBnN7jlt4T9zzPwtmw5mIahGFgvw1KDr7OItN2ZgtZ20UYC5m Go602nmHq0aPbU6SwGi1xohrliNsKaaciYiMaVIGRQq8iGr9Fe2HlvaA3BpB275i/gCVlUdG y5XLAv+yQMUvn5Z7XVsMroxDk/O+ae1ElyBvKiKyfWGJXTg5XUukkkyQmfWPxWUGoNA1P/P4 GMHSu7/Rqe/7m4uPu/RyTTqsSjjKJdP9kBwEzvqPtXsVoZuShtrptRQJDYflhgE4qmKSMKen ABEBAAHCwWUEGAECAA8FAlKbGksCGwwFCRLMAwAACgkQ6rA8WL/cR48RkA//SNzeW3CI8KHx rA0aeHW6Nb5ieoqVRBGLyjBM06RX6vHB9v4dJL6Z+yV2jGN2s+XZX2HILbuTOwcTxGkI3xTT e0cDXVaF5K8R/liigUjtwuC2v/sWgoWyUmK1Cy9CPYdcXmFq6nESfkUe8DYiGOUULdHq5w63 F53yOZ72iXRBQBZgkhPtRFu4lPYIzOsMag9DIJ9CthR1r0ziqU/keb94Qt3l+aXK7CwGdY7X T4zUIMHNYsuAuyX+NJIXfsN68TT6m7QmlUwxPs13nxmoVQzm4ruV+hlQKh1MtbsjWRkNgPxF IPiqoAEhy8QoddlSvRTwL5Z7zFQiwMdiXU7toL8pfzj/zJR1jELXKMipijrt5MLrV8XX3OPN yZZvh95VIl8mv+iAqwSZUufd2EJnvj5TObB0eH+a+34NWf/XqA3fPjE6KHzmdnw9PZjPEjlx JCPECSs+6gse1+GaEfKYuXzB/ENe2ctlcfx5iQJXFc+/+zG/uU/JX/pXJHA12CUfB5g7lH6X BZIHvRo3VTCDjXgbF5xxDAe5V4exf8d4oSNjQIFLYxxN7zkvH89EN6RPfRgsWN7bYArCwfS9 MOgs9pFeCOewR6qieK150aoqNENGfKFXJup+5VVl6I0mU+j0rgVDZDht2/QgP/Tb4lGBe+ai pOGaK/GYNR+Ad6bUmokKsx4= Organization: FreeBSD Message-ID: <370ccdb0-cb71-a4da-0a35-4e878eb6ba1c@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2018 17:11:22 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="zsTDxegmtOkjDLOAyKz15qm2TtvkcDoZs" X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2018 14:11:41 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --zsTDxegmtOkjDLOAyKz15qm2TtvkcDoZs Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="JnkhyfEJCborJK29zf4YjbG7OBNpdpkP0"; protected-headers="v1" From: Lev Serebryakov Reply-To: lev@FreeBSD.org To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Message-ID: <370ccdb0-cb71-a4da-0a35-4e878eb6ba1c@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: What are conditions to spread traffic across different NIC queues? References: In-Reply-To: --JnkhyfEJCborJK29zf4YjbG7OBNpdpkP0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 26.10.2018 15:30, Lev Serebryakov wrote: > I have "router" with two em (82574L) NICs. It has dual-core CPU and > each NIC creates two receive and two transmit queues: >=20 > $ sysctl dev.em | grep queue | grep _irq > dev.em.1.queue_rx_1.rx_irq: 0 > dev.em.1.queue_rx_0.rx_irq: 0 > dev.em.1.queue_tx_1.tx_irq: 0 > dev.em.1.queue_tx_0.tx_irq: 0 > dev.em.0.queue_rx_1.rx_irq: 0 > dev.em.0.queue_rx_0.rx_irq: 0 > dev.em.0.queue_tx_1.tx_irq: 0 > dev.em.0.queue_tx_0.tx_irq: 0 > $ >=20 > When I pass, say, 64 UDP streams through this router, only one core is= > 100% loaded and other is 100% idle. These streams are for same IP pair,= > but port pairs are all different. >=20 > What are right conditions to spread such traffic per queues and cores?= Ok, 82574L is "low end" chip, it supports only IP and IP+TCP checksums. 82576EB supports IP+UDP too. Intel, what is wrong with you?! --=20 // Lev Serebryakov --JnkhyfEJCborJK29zf4YjbG7OBNpdpkP0-- --zsTDxegmtOkjDLOAyKz15qm2TtvkcDoZs Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQKTBAEBCgB9FiEE+W0coLX0MYtnSzMK6rA8WL/cR48FAlvTIIpfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldEY5 NkQxQ0EwQjVGNDMxOEI2NzRCMzMwQUVBQjAzQzU4QkZEQzQ3OEYACgkQ6rA8WL/c R49FPw/+PPrDOPr3AU+/6mnP25teVQmXRDaO3WsiVLf83YEWX4n9JnIkz0e6nmrH ObCIVfO/Cf6k2g05Tyq58kgRfDHJMTdhKm0RXDcZIEbRr9O/S6Un6CbzCVMwSWYt AvMuLdp7Lr0xp9Q7eSL+hZ80RRSEIfayM1SCNtkuBve0jDs9kuelCcv54mEwtkbz aNAHdfP/NmIeS+5MaKniCi1kcstSVWOpg9SuNLLrh1NtQlUSflhETsZNl2b7NGJj gKVs6pJbwRxBlq3CBQwVxGzfcp1webwQXvPyTpzrrEvJ+BqPOsOHAf8BMdZgutiA G+GjSYDXN3KYIyZcRuM3fKyP53pzw0tReLrwfHl1o3WHXGOLAkXlhw1h0T3YVcHH RGPv9ODtcIO6Cwatyums0kmAjlWq2MJLFcQP/sThoQDIZhFi5cLf9fCO75/1XHuS 1Iaek1JLaBeiFjqd427LU5XFglx7wOerIsd+Gjf6LTagbPsilSDWkhTxLVxzwTyI I/fmqkiRgI4w0gUJuglPhtkkBjizic8OKxHPG65t2VXFiLr5iVtB7AqWBNDXGNLK tRtkMdpXQhTWeuOSwkJO5VCkYjff859t+f6UHVZIMW2n7B6804cWhfd9BVMOszUf W1le5GJqDsF7ISZlN5a8bEzspgH75mjhxwmfXPeX9SX1m8W1xNI= =S3Jj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --zsTDxegmtOkjDLOAyKz15qm2TtvkcDoZs-- From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Oct 26 15:04:13 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFE4210E9637 for ; Fri, 26 Oct 2018 15:04:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jeffrey.e.pieper@intel.com) Received: from mga14.intel.com (mga14.intel.com [192.55.52.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "fmsmga103.fm.intel.com", Issuer "COMODO RSA Organization Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 18DDB7ACE6; Fri, 26 Oct 2018 15:04:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jeffrey.e.pieper@intel.com) X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga005.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.41]) by fmsmga103.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 26 Oct 2018 08:04:05 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.54,428,1534834800"; d="scan'208";a="269029461" Received: from orsmsx102.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.22.225.129]) by orsmga005.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 26 Oct 2018 08:04:04 -0700 Received: from orsmsx151.amr.corp.intel.com (10.22.226.38) by ORSMSX102.amr.corp.intel.com (10.22.225.129) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.319.2; Fri, 26 Oct 2018 08:04:04 -0700 Received: from orsmsx111.amr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.12.89]) by ORSMSX151.amr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.7.31]) with mapi id 14.03.0319.002; Fri, 26 Oct 2018 08:04:04 -0700 From: "Pieper, Jeffrey E" To: "lev@FreeBSD.org" , "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: What are conditions to spread traffic across different NIC queues? Thread-Topic: What are conditions to spread traffic across different NIC queues? Thread-Index: AQHUbSgC8/DTQQkNREu6e/DLN6j9BaUyBpQA//+ZX4A= Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2018 15:04:03 +0000 Message-ID: <08D0D8DC-FCA8-4B56-9F4C-F407F69EFDE6@intel.com> References: <370ccdb0-cb71-a4da-0a35-4e878eb6ba1c@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <370ccdb0-cb71-a4da-0a35-4e878eb6ba1c@FreeBSD.org> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.10.3.181015 x-originating-ip: [10.254.78.11] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2018 15:04:14 -0000 U28gd2hhdCBleGFjdGx5IGlzIHlvdXIgY29tcGxhaW50PyBUaGF0IGEgaGlnaGVyIGVuZCBjaGlw c2V0IGhhcyBtb3JlIGZlYXR1cmVzIHRoYW4gYSBsb3ctZW5kIGNoaXBzZXQ/IA0KDQpKZWZmDQoN Cu+7v09uIDEwLzI2LzE4LCA3OjEzIEFNLCAiTGV2IFNlcmVicnlha292IiA8b3duZXItZnJlZWJz ZC1uZXRAZnJlZWJzZC5vcmcgb24gYmVoYWxmIG9mIGxldkBGcmVlQlNELm9yZz4gd3JvdGU6DQoN CiAgICBPbiAyNi4xMC4yMDE4IDE1OjMwLCBMZXYgU2VyZWJyeWFrb3Ygd3JvdGU6DQogICAgDQog ICAgPiAgSSBoYXZlICJyb3V0ZXIiIHdpdGggdHdvIGVtICg4MjU3NEwpIE5JQ3MuIEl0IGhhcyBk dWFsLWNvcmUgQ1BVIGFuZA0KICAgID4gZWFjaCBOSUMgY3JlYXRlcyB0d28gcmVjZWl2ZSBhbmQg dHdvIHRyYW5zbWl0IHF1ZXVlczoNCiAgICA+IA0KICAgID4gJCBzeXNjdGwgZGV2LmVtIHwgZ3Jl cCBxdWV1ZSB8IGdyZXAgX2lycQ0KICAgID4gZGV2LmVtLjEucXVldWVfcnhfMS5yeF9pcnE6IDAN CiAgICA+IGRldi5lbS4xLnF1ZXVlX3J4XzAucnhfaXJxOiAwDQogICAgPiBkZXYuZW0uMS5xdWV1 ZV90eF8xLnR4X2lycTogMA0KICAgID4gZGV2LmVtLjEucXVldWVfdHhfMC50eF9pcnE6IDANCiAg ICA+IGRldi5lbS4wLnF1ZXVlX3J4XzEucnhfaXJxOiAwDQogICAgPiBkZXYuZW0uMC5xdWV1ZV9y eF8wLnJ4X2lycTogMA0KICAgID4gZGV2LmVtLjAucXVldWVfdHhfMS50eF9pcnE6IDANCiAgICA+ IGRldi5lbS4wLnF1ZXVlX3R4XzAudHhfaXJxOiAwDQogICAgPiAkDQogICAgPiANCiAgICA+ICBX aGVuIEkgcGFzcywgc2F5LCA2NCBVRFAgc3RyZWFtcyB0aHJvdWdoIHRoaXMgcm91dGVyLCBvbmx5 IG9uZSBjb3JlIGlzDQogICAgPiAxMDAlIGxvYWRlZCBhbmQgb3RoZXIgaXMgMTAwJSBpZGxlLiBU aGVzZSBzdHJlYW1zIGFyZSBmb3Igc2FtZSBJUCBwYWlyLA0KICAgID4gYnV0IHBvcnQgcGFpcnMg YXJlIGFsbCBkaWZmZXJlbnQuDQogICAgPiANCiAgICA+ICBXaGF0IGFyZSByaWdodCBjb25kaXRp b25zIHRvIHNwcmVhZCBzdWNoIHRyYWZmaWMgcGVyIHF1ZXVlcyBhbmQgY29yZXM/DQogICAgIE9r LCA4MjU3NEwgaXMgImxvdyBlbmQiIGNoaXAsIGl0IHN1cHBvcnRzIG9ubHkgSVAgYW5kIElQK1RD UCBjaGVja3N1bXMuDQogICAgODI1NzZFQiBzdXBwb3J0cyBJUCtVRFAgdG9vLiBJbnRlbCwgd2hh dCBpcyB3cm9uZyB3aXRoIHlvdT8hDQogICAgDQogICAgLS0gDQogICAgLy8gTGV2IFNlcmVicnlh a292DQogICAgDQogICAgDQoNCg== From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Oct 26 15:16:02 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F90010E99D3 for ; Fri, 26 Oct 2018 15:16:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lev@FreeBSD.org) Received: from onlyone.not-for.work (onlyone.not-for.work [148.251.9.81]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 011837B213 for ; Fri, 26 Oct 2018 15:16:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lev@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [192.168.23.186] (unknown [89.113.128.32]) (Authenticated sender: lev@serebryakov.spb.ru) by onlyone.not-for.work (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3E7F036A; Fri, 26 Oct 2018 18:16:00 +0300 (MSK) Reply-To: lev@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: What are conditions to spread traffic across different NIC queues? To: "Pieper, Jeffrey E" , "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" References: <370ccdb0-cb71-a4da-0a35-4e878eb6ba1c@FreeBSD.org> <08D0D8DC-FCA8-4B56-9F4C-F407F69EFDE6@intel.com> From: Lev Serebryakov Openpgp: preference=signencrypt Autocrypt: addr=lev@FreeBSD.org; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= xsFNBFKbGksBEADeguVs+XyJc3mL3iiOBqDd16wSk97YTJYOi4VsHsINzJr09oFvNDiaDBIi fLn2p8XcJvehcsF2GSgrfXfw+uK4O1jyNIKJmiYA0EtE+ZbRtvDrrE0w6Q8+SDeKA21SWh3Y vSQ0DJUontbgW55ER2CbEiIUTIn34uQ0kmESAaw/v5p/9ue8yPTmURvv130FqPFz8VPzltqL NxyGt54TxPfKAzAHEIwxlEZ63JOwzloKh1UDBExcsf9nJO08/TAVgR5UZ5njFBPzaaquhRoP qPJLEQQDqxPIlvMNtHKf7iIebE4BHeqgCdJA0BoiR6gpa0wlsZtdrTPK3n4wYSphLvGbhfOZ YW/hbcu7HYS/FImkVxB3iY17kcC1UTnx4ZaYeASPBGOOPbXky1lLfmDGWIFT//70yx+G17qD OZzF1SvJJhGvh6ilFYaWMX7T+nIp6Mcafc4D7AakXM+XdubNXOMlCJhzPcZ0skgAEnYV587w V7em5fDVwQccwvtfezzqKeJAU5TGiywBHSR5Svzk2FwRNf6M//hWkpq0SRR63iOhkHGOAEBi 69GfEIwH2/w24rLxP0E+Hqq8n+EWNkPatw1Mhcl5PKkdvGCjJUaGNMkpBffjyYo254JXRscR eEnwdIkJt4ErDvjb2/UrOFq31wWMOiLzJeVchAgvTHBMRfP9aQARAQABzShMZXYgU2VyZWJy eWFrb3YgPGxldkBzZXJlYnJ5YWtvdi5zcGIucnU+wsGCBBMBCAAsAhsDBwsJCAcDAgEGFQgC CQoLBBYCAwECHgECF4ACGQEFAlKbP8wFCQlmJwEACgkQ6rA8WL/cR4/6VBAAjRMyyX3PBFx/ HxyiIZ698EfwlWUua8Ft4crtrdK52m0qNkbBB9BH8xQgBHG32A1CwyzQnzxHgZuoOWMjh+Qq WJv7dmpM/q/c1GCJHhlPgewXrciTwpAamZILN071u+1GCPWwGRPzfQ/U+k63KJWx9ozf4doM WTTom6Cqcssi4J1u5kkt52a5ZRhsCK9pEVGilk36XTP9BakGrnMSIxF/NK4xeZVX2q+Nuqvf RchyofKXVgLEDLwb1cd/baLtBpDzy0PTN2Zl2lX4kOA6jwTKsqRya9A1Vui1KXwPh2XViTQ1 7Y3l5qg/M+sR73DohezP6bO6huOnLhty17jAqHPNlD6RonDo+j8uIlEg4iMSTN3MhzkBAu0Q pe3ucQ0o1767JiXN3fsNvRzSFhLVNDqPLce4uKlMogsbreXWvdgHGTN1ybOHGbybZnP77yHz uNBacbmG3vL/OLXMqwLdL2JXoiec4DmXjjCdhTBl5xLV9Hz/6VWKqElteg8QFVvHB3tHWzJ4 /rpiVEixytCIII6DS33BXZ0h2EOkK/6AYA2SJxy1vgOH4SZBtDBHoezmHV2nFnq5O0c7AuAB 7WPWgQG0sEwHQPZmg/baRGitRJnaxf/Gvf1DeD1x1VrcoVke2vwBcgDM3kugP8L9hsqic2D3 dI+gP76haeuvNNZr3y9L9zvOwU0EUpsaSwEQALRr3B+OjY/cnJPstz5CVsVWyEZtJtrNviZr tBgbkhlkPm98sEWR4+gbpyeufdYJengDjeGzMDKcLB7h5fICS/j6A8XdlJ40TlbPfNgb6OHa ebaIYKTJpXKR9sD7ZyGivYMofm0em40wGUX7BIkdkomaWj+wUiS0CdXU0FWDj9wv73+Eim+X zZyXeFgIPv97v+pET7DfwKkADOfrkW9s4OfvGVjd+wm35wc8EngQEz0qdPBxx74X7vZFAxlA SXu8gDBJGYt2Bkc3QwULnfeXrZJWgqNPR5o44gGu96yaiOFaN/C6CJtev5ZEX+0ZxbvsHHB7 Z5AtsRURKpZ4w5HFHGhzHtDtoAKgeZ/gbhTVXPHvNQR818eN+Nl5BV8BRF/8yhR6VlJb8GYw h8oKDeVGVYC34+raHZQAM9WoBnN7jlt4T9zzPwtmw5mIahGFgvw1KDr7OItN2ZgtZ20UYC5m Go602nmHq0aPbU6SwGi1xohrliNsKaaciYiMaVIGRQq8iGr9Fe2HlvaA3BpB275i/gCVlUdG y5XLAv+yQMUvn5Z7XVsMroxDk/O+ae1ElyBvKiKyfWGJXTg5XUukkkyQmfWPxWUGoNA1P/P4 GMHSu7/Rqe/7m4uPu/RyTTqsSjjKJdP9kBwEzvqPtXsVoZuShtrptRQJDYflhgE4qmKSMKen ABEBAAHCwWUEGAECAA8FAlKbGksCGwwFCRLMAwAACgkQ6rA8WL/cR48RkA//SNzeW3CI8KHx rA0aeHW6Nb5ieoqVRBGLyjBM06RX6vHB9v4dJL6Z+yV2jGN2s+XZX2HILbuTOwcTxGkI3xTT e0cDXVaF5K8R/liigUjtwuC2v/sWgoWyUmK1Cy9CPYdcXmFq6nESfkUe8DYiGOUULdHq5w63 F53yOZ72iXRBQBZgkhPtRFu4lPYIzOsMag9DIJ9CthR1r0ziqU/keb94Qt3l+aXK7CwGdY7X T4zUIMHNYsuAuyX+NJIXfsN68TT6m7QmlUwxPs13nxmoVQzm4ruV+hlQKh1MtbsjWRkNgPxF IPiqoAEhy8QoddlSvRTwL5Z7zFQiwMdiXU7toL8pfzj/zJR1jELXKMipijrt5MLrV8XX3OPN yZZvh95VIl8mv+iAqwSZUufd2EJnvj5TObB0eH+a+34NWf/XqA3fPjE6KHzmdnw9PZjPEjlx JCPECSs+6gse1+GaEfKYuXzB/ENe2ctlcfx5iQJXFc+/+zG/uU/JX/pXJHA12CUfB5g7lH6X BZIHvRo3VTCDjXgbF5xxDAe5V4exf8d4oSNjQIFLYxxN7zkvH89EN6RPfRgsWN7bYArCwfS9 MOgs9pFeCOewR6qieK150aoqNENGfKFXJup+5VVl6I0mU+j0rgVDZDht2/QgP/Tb4lGBe+ai pOGaK/GYNR+Ad6bUmokKsx4= Organization: FreeBSD Message-ID: <49927120-c7d4-eb30-38ae-94ee31fbd4cb@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2018 18:15:59 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <08D0D8DC-FCA8-4B56-9F4C-F407F69EFDE6@intel.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="OZ41y2YXX30tagcM0iSSUTih6sKyOSMuA" X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2018 15:16:02 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --OZ41y2YXX30tagcM0iSSUTih6sKyOSMuA Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="wHA7UhnXZ2SFoqNaAh1E0mKIkiE4Et0vn"; protected-headers="v1" From: Lev Serebryakov Reply-To: lev@FreeBSD.org To: "Pieper, Jeffrey E" , "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" Message-ID: <49927120-c7d4-eb30-38ae-94ee31fbd4cb@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: What are conditions to spread traffic across different NIC queues? References: <370ccdb0-cb71-a4da-0a35-4e878eb6ba1c@FreeBSD.org> <08D0D8DC-FCA8-4B56-9F4C-F407F69EFDE6@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <08D0D8DC-FCA8-4B56-9F4C-F407F69EFDE6@intel.com> --wHA7UhnXZ2SFoqNaAh1E0mKIkiE4Et0vn Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 26.10.2018 18:04, Pieper, Jeffrey E wrote: > So what exactly is your complaint? That a higher end chipset has more f= eatures than a low-end chipset?=20 Please, don't take my complain too serious, it was emotional reaction after 2 hours of googling, reading datasheets and investigation :-) I'm perfectly happy with Intel hardware, to be honest. And all newer chipsets support this feature even desktop ones (I210, for example, supports it according to datasheet). There is slight problem =E2=80=94 I can not pay something more and get b= etter in these days, as typically, nobody produce "same motherboard but with slightly better NICs for +$5/$10/$15". But it is not Intel problem, per se, but market problem. For example, MoBo in question is Intel D2500CC (yes, it is OLD, I know), and there was NO same MoBo with better NIC chips. Same with Supermicro, same with other =C2=ABembedded=C2=BB hardware manufacturers. = And don't ask me about desktop MoBos :-) --=20 // Lev Serebryakov --wHA7UhnXZ2SFoqNaAh1E0mKIkiE4Et0vn-- --OZ41y2YXX30tagcM0iSSUTih6sKyOSMuA Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQKTBAEBCgB9FiEE+W0coLX0MYtnSzMK6rA8WL/cR48FAlvTL69fFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldEY5 NkQxQ0EwQjVGNDMxOEI2NzRCMzMwQUVBQjAzQzU4QkZEQzQ3OEYACgkQ6rA8WL/c R4/NiQ/9G+VdPVIksqx0RXzWRXG0lbxYq54K4acpLHaAOiyuS9k/xSN1BiZzA3qt Kij+1QLGltIa8Eiie5u2vXfZLuoH+OAcR3ZgMaQh+nvPZ9jHn0ChuwtLLSPiUrcK n03mR+v20Thme0uRt1NBlD27I4/5Wc4gAWxwXeYZZdOWQ1qnE0ChtfjtO1rZOTaT HVBCgf6+VsJsnkZlV/HBjKGumcWi87zMnXBoxZTrL8TJ+DSvhyst8FLOpc/UpPtF Ic8L6m12vsQ0MB2TXYyM/yajzyah6XXizhdNpCHdq96BmWtdTKdiz1gVz4BQH2AM g1+Ydw3XUD6Wqi/Rn0kHwY1ZjPEevIkUyKPLSnwQzemZDWqv5jVguE6crpYDdoRL Rff1uxBI5CQX4GP1/U9SX4R0e8pZ+qddWsPUBJTmPuDI4enEn0gb6xwerexQlOSm TtOIF2r7uHIOMzeKAXZ//7KDcDWJchr6zt8OjrSVtMVHbmgiUO1py++hbEh6rwlX dlpbyXc3gLO21R6GiCkdKybcBmsrzU56VJQFa/76iXqTTTOvvuV3Ivdf7hrefEbN S9SyK/v90rj/i+kyYVDGXH7+KjutDemMlxUjeeLUDjoNJ2+sEcRd3IcZLhJ3eMpT /dXui438X5l8SUmB6MTIi6AlMR8tsH4M8v2N3QHbO3Boxe2E6NY= =js2o -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --OZ41y2YXX30tagcM0iSSUTih6sKyOSMuA-- From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sat Oct 27 04:59:56 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D17DE10D8EA3 for ; Sat, 27 Oct 2018 04:59:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E4C27D90B for ; Sat, 27 Oct 2018 04:59:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 3418110D8E9D; Sat, 27 Oct 2018 04:59:56 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 231E210D8E9B for ; Sat, 27 Oct 2018 04:59:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 82A877D8FE for ; Sat, 27 Oct 2018 04:59:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A901AB28 for ; Sat, 27 Oct 2018 04:59:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w9R4xs8s082970 for ; Sat, 27 Oct 2018 04:59:54 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from bugzilla@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id w9R4xsPC082969 for net@FreeBSD.org; Sat, 27 Oct 2018 04:59:54 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: bugzilla set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 220078] [patch] [panic] repeatable kernel panic due to unlocked INADDR_TO_IFP usage Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2018 04:59:53 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: patch X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: commit-hook@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: eugen@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: mfc-stable11+ X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2018 04:59:57 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D220078 --- Comment #28 from commit-hook@freebsd.org --- A commit references this bug: Author: eugen Date: Sat Oct 27 04:59:36 UTC 2018 New revision: 339808 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/339808 Log: Prevent ip_input() from panicing due to unprotected access to INADDR_HASH. PR: 220078 MFC after: 1 month Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D12457 Tested-by: Cassiano Peixoto and others Changes: head/sys/netinet/ip_input.c --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sat Oct 27 04:45:44 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D78610D84AE for ; Sat, 27 Oct 2018 04:45:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daemon-user@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A21E7CEA4 for ; Sat, 27 Oct 2018 04:45:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daemon-user@freebsd.org) Received: from reviews.nyi.freebsd.org (reviews.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:607c::16:b]) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F34639AD for ; Sat, 27 Oct 2018 04:45:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daemon-user@freebsd.org) Received: by reviews.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1346) id 4AF652220F2; Sat, 27 Oct 2018 04:45:42 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2018 04:45:42 +0000 To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org From: Phabricator Reply-to: D12457+325+b80235a94357a014@reviews.freebsd.org Subject: [Differential] D12457: Complete INADDR_HASH lock protection Message-ID: <4f51479c7a4f05dd4f7efdbe9f1db544@localhost.localdomain> X-Priority: 3 X-Phabricator-Sent-This-Message: Yes X-Mail-Transport-Agent: MetaMTA X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-Phabricator-Mail-Tags: , , X-Herald-Rules: <28>, <81> X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: Precedence: bulk Thread-Topic: PHID-DREV-em3ftishzefmzreicm43 X-Phabricator-Mail-ID: 1250656 X-Phabricator-Send-Attempt: vikzbnpngj5occcc In-Reply-To: References: Thread-Index: OTI2Y2JhN2MzZmJlZTNlNjdkMzJhNjk3ZDQ3IFvT7XY= X-Phabricator-Stamps: actor(PHID-APPS-PhabricatorDiffusionApplication) application(Differential) author(@eugen_grosbein.net) herald(H28) herald(H81) monogram(D12457) object-type(DREV) phid(PHID-DREV-em3ftishzefmzreicm43) reviewer(@ae) reviewer(@avg) reviewer(@mav) reviewer(@rwatson) revision-repository(rS) revision-status(published) subscriber(@bz) subscriber(@freebsd-net-list) subscriber(@imp) via(daemon) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="b1_4f51479c7a4f05dd4f7efdbe9f1db544" X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2018 04:45:44 -0000 --b1_4f51479c7a4f05dd4f7efdbe9f1db544 Content-Type: text/plain; charset = "utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 VGhpcyByZXZpc2lvbiB3YXMgbm90IGFjY2VwdGVkIHdoZW4gaXQgbGFuZGVkOyBpdCBsYW5kZWQg aW4gc3RhdGUgIk5lZWRzIFJldmlldyIuClRoaXMgcmV2aXNpb24gd2FzIGF1dG9tYXRpY2FsbHkg dXBkYXRlZCB0byByZWZsZWN0IHRoZSBjb21taXR0ZWQgY2hhbmdlcy4KQ2xvc2VkIGJ5IGNvbW1p dCByUzMzOTgwNjogUHJldmVudCBzdGYoNCkgZnJvbSBwYW5pY2luZyBkdWUgdG8gdW5wcm90ZWN0 ZWQgYWNjZXNzIHRvIElOQUREUl9IQVNILiAoYXV0aG9yZWQgYnkgZXVnZW4sIGNvbW1pdHRlZCBi eSApLgoKQ0hBTkdFRCBQUklPUiBUTyBDT01NSVQKICBodHRwczovL3Jldmlld3MuZnJlZWJzZC5v cmcvRDEyNDU3P3ZzPTMzMzEyJmlkPTQ5Njc4I3RvYwoKUkVQT1NJVE9SWQogIHJTIEZyZWVCU0Qg c3JjIHJlcG9zaXRvcnkKCkNIQU5HRVMgU0lOQ0UgTEFTVCBVUERBVEUKICBodHRwczovL3Jldmll d3MuZnJlZWJzZC5vcmcvRDEyNDU3P3ZzPTMzMzEyJmlkPTQ5Njc4CgpDSEFOR0VTIFNJTkNFIExB U1QgQUNUSU9OCiAgaHR0cHM6Ly9yZXZpZXdzLmZyZWVic2Qub3JnL0QxMjQ1Ny9uZXcvCgpSRVZJ U0lPTiBERVRBSUwKICBodHRwczovL3Jldmlld3MuZnJlZWJzZC5vcmcvRDEyNDU3CgpBRkZFQ1RF RCBGSUxFUwogIGhlYWQvc3lzL25ldC9pZl9zdGYuYwoKQ0hBTkdFIERFVEFJTFMKCmRpZmYgLS1n aXQgYS9oZWFkL3N5cy9uZXQvaWZfc3RmLmMgYi9oZWFkL3N5cy9uZXQvaWZfc3RmLmMKLS0tIGEv aGVhZC9zeXMvbmV0L2lmX3N0Zi5jCisrKyBiL2hlYWQvc3lzL25ldC9pZl9zdGYuYwpAQCAtMzY3 LDYgKzM2Nyw3IEBACiBzdGF0aWMgaW50CiBzdGZfZ2V0c3JjaWZhNihzdHJ1Y3QgaWZuZXQgKmlm cCwgc3RydWN0IGluNl9hZGRyICphZGRyLCBzdHJ1Y3QgaW42X2FkZHIgKm1hc2spCiB7CisJc3Ry dWN0IHJtX3ByaW90cmFja2VyIGluX2lmYV90cmFja2VyOwogCXN0cnVjdCBpZmFkZHIgKmlhOwog CXN0cnVjdCBpbl9pZmFkZHIgKmlhNDsKIAlzdHJ1Y3QgaW42X2lmYWRkciAqaWE2OwpAQCAtMzgy LDkgKzM4MywxMSBAQAogCQkJY29udGludWU7CiAKIAkJYmNvcHkoR0VUX1Y0KCZzaW42LT5zaW42 X2FkZHIpLCAmaW4sIHNpemVvZihpbikpOworCQlJTl9JRkFERFJfUkxPQ0soJmluX2lmYV90cmFj a2VyKTsKIAkJTElTVF9GT1JFQUNIKGlhNCwgSU5BRERSX0hBU0goaW4uc19hZGRyKSwgaWFfaGFz aCkKIAkJCWlmIChpYTQtPmlhX2FkZHIuc2luX2FkZHIuc19hZGRyID09IGluLnNfYWRkcikKIAkJ CQlicmVhazsKKwkJSU5fSUZBRERSX1JVTkxPQ0soJmluX2lmYV90cmFja2VyKTsKIAkJaWYgKGlh NCA9PSBOVUxMKQogCQkJY29udGludWU7CiAKCgoKRU1BSUwgUFJFRkVSRU5DRVMKICBodHRwczov L3Jldmlld3MuZnJlZWJzZC5vcmcvc2V0dGluZ3MvcGFuZWwvZW1haWxwcmVmZXJlbmNlcy8KClRv OiBldWdlbl9ncm9zYmVpbi5uZXQsIGFlLCBhdmcsIG1hdiwgcndhdHNvbgpDYzogYnosIGltcCwg ZnJlZWJzZC1uZXQtbGlzdAo= --b1_4f51479c7a4f05dd4f7efdbe9f1db544 Content-Type: text/x-patch; charset=utf-8; name="D12457.49678.patch" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="D12457.49678.patch" ZGlmZiAtLWdpdCBhL2hlYWQvc3lzL25ldC9pZl9zdGYuYyBiL2hlYWQvc3lzL25ldC9pZl9zdGYu YwotLS0gYS9oZWFkL3N5cy9uZXQvaWZfc3RmLmMKKysrIGIvaGVhZC9zeXMvbmV0L2lmX3N0Zi5j CkBAIC0zNjcsNiArMzY3LDcgQEAKIHN0YXRpYyBpbnQKIHN0Zl9nZXRzcmNpZmE2KHN0cnVjdCBp Zm5ldCAqaWZwLCBzdHJ1Y3QgaW42X2FkZHIgKmFkZHIsIHN0cnVjdCBpbjZfYWRkciAqbWFzaykK IHsKKwlzdHJ1Y3Qgcm1fcHJpb3RyYWNrZXIgaW5faWZhX3RyYWNrZXI7CiAJc3RydWN0IGlmYWRk ciAqaWE7CiAJc3RydWN0IGluX2lmYWRkciAqaWE0OwogCXN0cnVjdCBpbjZfaWZhZGRyICppYTY7 CkBAIC0zODIsOSArMzgzLDExIEBACiAJCQljb250aW51ZTsKIAogCQliY29weShHRVRfVjQoJnNp bjYtPnNpbjZfYWRkciksICZpbiwgc2l6ZW9mKGluKSk7CisJCUlOX0lGQUREUl9STE9DSygmaW5f aWZhX3RyYWNrZXIpOwogCQlMSVNUX0ZPUkVBQ0goaWE0LCBJTkFERFJfSEFTSChpbi5zX2FkZHIp LCBpYV9oYXNoKQogCQkJaWYgKGlhNC0+aWFfYWRkci5zaW5fYWRkci5zX2FkZHIgPT0gaW4uc19h ZGRyKQogCQkJCWJyZWFrOworCQlJTl9JRkFERFJfUlVOTE9DSygmaW5faWZhX3RyYWNrZXIpOwog CQlpZiAoaWE0ID09IE5VTEwpCiAJCQljb250aW51ZTsKIAoK --b1_4f51479c7a4f05dd4f7efdbe9f1db544-- From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sat Oct 27 04:45:44 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E410B10D84AC for ; Sat, 27 Oct 2018 04:45:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 485B67CE39 for ; Sat, 27 Oct 2018 04:45:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 4D7DC10D84A9; Sat, 27 Oct 2018 04:45:36 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C83610D84A8 for ; Sat, 27 Oct 2018 04:45:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CE7607CDE3 for ; Sat, 27 Oct 2018 04:45:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 80A25A9AE for ; Sat, 27 Oct 2018 04:45:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w9R4jYWr054528 for ; Sat, 27 Oct 2018 04:45:34 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from bugzilla@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id w9R4jY4Y054527 for net@FreeBSD.org; Sat, 27 Oct 2018 04:45:34 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: bugzilla set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 220078] [patch] [panic] repeatable kernel panic due to unlocked INADDR_TO_IFP usage Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2018 04:45:34 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: patch X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: commit-hook@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: eugen@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: mfc-stable11+ X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2018 04:45:44 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D220078 --- Comment #26 from commit-hook@freebsd.org --- A commit references this bug: Author: eugen Date: Sat Oct 27 04:45:28 UTC 2018 New revision: 339806 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/339806 Log: Prevent stf(4) from panicing due to unprotected access to INADDR_HASH. PR: 220078 MFC after: 1 month Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D12457 Tested-by: Cassiano Peixoto and others Changes: head/sys/net/if_stf.c --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sat Oct 27 04:53:48 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E91110D884A for ; Sat, 27 Oct 2018 04:53:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 082C97D362 for ; Sat, 27 Oct 2018 04:53:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id C2A8610D8848; Sat, 27 Oct 2018 04:53:47 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1BF210D8847 for ; Sat, 27 Oct 2018 04:53:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 53B5F7D35B for ; Sat, 27 Oct 2018 04:53:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D534AB12 for ; Sat, 27 Oct 2018 04:53:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w9R4rk1L075041 for ; Sat, 27 Oct 2018 04:53:46 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from bugzilla@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id w9R4rkTE075040 for net@FreeBSD.org; Sat, 27 Oct 2018 04:53:46 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: bugzilla set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 220078] [patch] [panic] repeatable kernel panic due to unlocked INADDR_TO_IFP usage Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2018 04:53:46 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: patch X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: commit-hook@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: eugen@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: mfc-stable11+ X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2018 04:53:48 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D220078 --- Comment #27 from commit-hook@freebsd.org --- A commit references this bug: Author: eugen Date: Sat Oct 27 04:53:26 UTC 2018 New revision: 339807 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/339807 Log: Prevent multicast code from panicing due to unprotected access to INADDR_HASH. PR: 220078 MFC after: 1 month Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D12457 Tested-by: Cassiano Peixoto and others Changes: head/sys/netinet/in_mcast.c --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sat Oct 27 11:08:20 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 431BE10E9BA4 for ; Sat, 27 Oct 2018 11:08:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list+org.freebsd.net@io7m.com) Received: from mail.io7m.com (mail.io7m.com [IPv6:2001:19f0:5:752:f000::]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.io7m.com", Issuer "arc7 CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E84568C010 for ; Sat, 27 Oct 2018 11:08:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list+org.freebsd.net@io7m.com) Received: from almond.int.arc7.info (unknown [IPv6:2a02:390:7502:2:0:2:4:0]) by mail.io7m.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8A6D92CC7A for ; Sat, 27 Oct 2018 11:08:12 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2018 12:08:02 +0100 From: Mark Raynsford To: Subject: Re: ASUS PCE-AC88 AC3100 Supported? Message-ID: <20181027120802.1eae4964@almond.int.arc7.info> In-Reply-To: <20180624191354.5b6f4a0a@almond.int.arc7.info> References: <20180624115724.25e404e7@almond.int.arc7.info> <20180624191354.5b6f4a0a@almond.int.arc7.info> Organization: io7m.com OpenPGP: id=B84E17747616C6174C68D5E55C1A7B712812CC05; url=http://io7m.com/pgp/B84E_1774_7616_C617_4C68_D5E5_5C1A_7B71_2812_CC05.key MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; boundary="Sig_/IHh+v1c4IC8+qBrQtmCHlsh"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2018 11:08:20 -0000 --Sig_/IHh+v1c4IC8+qBrQtmCHlsh Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2018-06-24T19:13:54 +0100 Mark Raynsford wrote: > > The device is listed here: >=20 > https://wikidevi.com/wiki/ASUS_PCE-AC88 >=20 > If that wiki page is to be trusted: >=20 > "This device is using a Broadcom BCM4366 (4x4 11ac) for maximum PHY > rates of 2.1Gbps" >=20 > The hardware notes for 11.1 say: >=20 > "The bwn(4) driver supports Broadcom BCM43xx based wireless > devices..." >=20 > But the actual card itself isn't listed. To follow up on this, because I actually bought one, the card doesn't appear to be supported on 11.2-RELEASE. There's nothing in dmesg. I see the following: # pciconf -lv none2@pci0:7:0:0: class=3D0x028000 card=3D0x86fb1043 chip=3D0x43c314e4 rev= =3D0x04 hdr=3D0x00 vendor =3D 'Broadcom Limited' class =3D network Nothing appears in ifconfig. --=20 Mark Raynsford | http://www.io7m.com --Sig_/IHh+v1c4IC8+qBrQtmCHlsh Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEARYKAB0WIQS4Thd0dhbGF0xo1eVcGntxKBLMBQUCW9RHEgAKCRBcGntxKBLM BeZ1AP0cdia/T8kBFF+THv5rHPVT0wYJX158vCmwiKV5jsVorwD/SP6o0E7hABLR 7cq0lgdaiDX5k/Tyu2HckqDP3D6BcQk= =1v/L -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/IHh+v1c4IC8+qBrQtmCHlsh-- From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sat Oct 27 15:16:22 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63D1C10887A5 for ; Sat, 27 Oct 2018 15:16:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vit@otcnet.ru) Received: from mail.otcnet.ru (mail.otcnet.ru [194.190.78.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7D3E6E0F9 for ; Sat, 27 Oct 2018 15:16:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vit@otcnet.ru) Received: from Victors-MacBook-Air-2.local (unknown [195.91.148.145]) by mail.otcnet.ru (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7ED1659677B for ; Sat, 27 Oct 2018 18:16:19 +0300 (MSK) From: Victor Gamov Organization: OTCnet Subject: ipfw on bridge connecting vlans To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Message-ID: <36cd661e-ca54-be94-fd64-01ee768d5053@otcnet.ru> Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2018 18:16:20 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2018 15:16:22 -0000 Hi All I have some misunderstanding how ipfw work with VLAN and bridge I have following config bridge2 ------------ / | \ / | \ / | \ vlan200 vlan300 vlan400 (igb0) (igb0) (igb1) ===== net.link.bridge.ipfw: 1 net.link.bridge.allow_llz_overlap: 0 net.link.bridge.inherit_mac: 0 net.link.bridge.log_stp: 0 net.link.bridge.pfil_local_phys: 0 net.link.bridge.pfil_member: 0 net.link.bridge.ipfw_arp: 1 net.link.bridge.pfil_bridge: 0 net.link.bridge.pfil_onlyip: 0 net.link.ether.ipfw=1 ===== I need to allow some multicast from some vlans, block other multicast and forward allowed multicast into other vlans For example. Allow 239.0.0.10 received via vlan200 but block the same 239.0.0.10 if it comes via other vlan. Then bridge 239.0.0.10 into vlan400 The simplest ipfw rules for this example: ===== table blockit create type iface table blockit add vlan200 table blockit add vlan300 table blockit add vlan400 1000 allow ip from any to any via igb0 1002 allow ip from any to any via igb2 1100 deny ip from any to any mac-type 0x0806 via bridge2 1102 allow ip from any to any via bridge2 2000 allow ip from any to 239.0.0.10 in via vlan200 4000 allow ip from any to 239.0.0.10 out via vlan400 9000 deny ip from any to any via table(blockit) 65000 allow ip from any to any ===== My expectations are follows: 1. ethernet packet tagged as VLAN-200 arrives igb0. This packet has igb0 as 'recv'. Packet checked by ipfw now so I need 1000 allow ip from any to any via igb0 1002 allow ip from any to any via igb2 2. ethernet packet untagged and checked by ipfw. This packet has vlan200 as 'recv' Packet pass 2000. If dst-239.0.0.10 comes from vlan300 it blocked by 9000 3. IP-packet comes through if_bridge and checked by ipfw. ARP packet blocked by 1100. Other packets pass via bridge2 by 1102 4. IP multicast packet copied to all bridge members and checked by ipfw on all outgoing interfaces: packet pass 4000 on vlan400, but blocked by 9000 on vlan300. So only one bridge-member has this packet. 5. ethernet packet tagged as VLAN-400 and checked by ipfw. Packet pass by 4000 6. tagged packet out via igb2 and checked by ipfw. packet pass by 1002 Can somebody explain me how tagged multicast packet goes via bridge and passed into IPFW and correct my previous packet path? Thanks! -- CU Victor Gamov From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sat Oct 27 15:44:46 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D1E610C78C9 for ; Sat, 27 Oct 2018 15:44:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Received: from hz.grosbein.net (hz.grosbein.net [IPv6:2a01:4f8:d12:604::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "hz.grosbein.net", Issuer "hz.grosbein.net" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 130466F0D8 for ; Sat, 27 Oct 2018 15:44:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Received: from eg.sd.rdtc.ru (eg.sd.rdtc.ru [IPv6:2a03:3100:c:13:0:0:0:5]) by hz.grosbein.net (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id w9RFicaa068224 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 27 Oct 2018 17:44:38 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) X-Envelope-From: eugen@grosbein.net X-Envelope-To: vit@otcnet.ru Received: from [10.58.0.4] (dadv@[10.58.0.4]) by eg.sd.rdtc.ru (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id w9RFib2A068150 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Sat, 27 Oct 2018 22:44:37 +0700 (+07) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Subject: Re: ipfw on bridge connecting vlans To: Victor Gamov , freebsd-net@freebsd.org References: <36cd661e-ca54-be94-fd64-01ee768d5053@otcnet.ru> From: Eugene Grosbein Message-ID: <9b8d8c04-8e3e-b148-8a08-135d6ac1785d@grosbein.net> Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2018 22:44:35 +0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <36cd661e-ca54-be94-fd64-01ee768d5053@otcnet.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,LOCAL_FROM,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Report: * -2.3 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record * 2.6 LOCAL_FROM From my domains X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on hz.grosbein.net X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2018 15:44:46 -0000 27.10.2018 22:16, Victor Gamov wrote: > > Hi All > > I have some misunderstanding how ipfw work with VLAN and bridge > > I have following config > > > bridge2 > ------------ > / | \ > / | \ > / | \ > vlan200 vlan300 vlan400 > (igb0) (igb0) (igb1) > > > ===== > net.link.bridge.ipfw: 1 > net.link.bridge.allow_llz_overlap: 0 > net.link.bridge.inherit_mac: 0 > net.link.bridge.log_stp: 0 > net.link.bridge.pfil_local_phys: 0 > net.link.bridge.pfil_member: 0 > net.link.bridge.ipfw_arp: 1 > net.link.bridge.pfil_bridge: 0 > net.link.bridge.pfil_onlyip: 0 > > net.link.ether.ipfw=1 > ===== > > > I need to allow some multicast from some vlans, block other multicast and forward allowed multicast into other vlans Your ruleset needs to differentiate packets based on name of incoming bridge member but you forgot to enable net.link.bridge.pfil_member=1. Enable it. Also note that change of net.link.bridge.ipfw from 0 to 1 disables net.link.bridge.{pfil_member|pfil_onlyip|pfil_bridge} but you are allowed to enable them after. net.link.bridge.pfil_member=1 makes frames enter ruleset as incoming from bridge member, zero disables this pass. net.link.bridge.ipfw=1 makes frames enter ruleset again as incoming from bridge interface itself without distinction of bridge member, and for forwarded frames enter ruleset one more time as outgoing from the bridge itself. And frame enters ruleset one MORE time as outgoing from bridge member if net.link.bridge.pfil_member=1. From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sat Oct 27 16:26:42 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C0DC10C9DD5 for ; Sat, 27 Oct 2018 16:26:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vit@otcnet.ru) Received: from mail.otcnet.ru (mail.otcnet.ru [194.190.78.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDB7870818 for ; Sat, 27 Oct 2018 16:26:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vit@otcnet.ru) Received: from Victors-MacBook-Air-2.local (unknown [195.91.148.145]) by mail.otcnet.ru (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A99315965A3 for ; Sat, 27 Oct 2018 19:26:40 +0300 (MSK) Subject: Re: ipfw on bridge connecting vlans To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org References: <36cd661e-ca54-be94-fd64-01ee768d5053@otcnet.ru> <9b8d8c04-8e3e-b148-8a08-135d6ac1785d@grosbein.net> From: Victor Gamov Organization: OTCnet Message-ID: <49c4193a-d38c-eff8-3ab8-25b103c2dcba@otcnet.ru> Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2018 19:26:41 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <9b8d8c04-8e3e-b148-8a08-135d6ac1785d@grosbein.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2018 16:26:42 -0000 On 27/10/2018 18:44, Eugene Grosbein wrote: > 27.10.2018 22:16, Victor Gamov wrote: >> >> Hi All >> >> I have some misunderstanding how ipfw work with VLAN and bridge >> >> I have following config >> >> >> bridge2 >> ------------ >> / | \ >> / | \ >> / | \ >> vlan200 vlan300 vlan400 >> (igb0) (igb0) (igb1) >> >> >> ===== >> net.link.bridge.ipfw: 1 >> net.link.bridge.allow_llz_overlap: 0 >> net.link.bridge.inherit_mac: 0 >> net.link.bridge.log_stp: 0 >> net.link.bridge.pfil_local_phys: 0 >> net.link.bridge.pfil_member: 0 >> net.link.bridge.ipfw_arp: 1 >> net.link.bridge.pfil_bridge: 0 >> net.link.bridge.pfil_onlyip: 0 >> >> net.link.ether.ipfw=1 >> ===== >> >> >> I need to allow some multicast from some vlans, block other multicast and forward allowed multicast into other vlans > > Your ruleset needs to differentiate packets based on name of incoming bridge member > but you forgot to enable net.link.bridge.pfil_member=1. Enable it. > > Also note that change of net.link.bridge.ipfw from 0 to 1 disables > net.link.bridge.{pfil_member|pfil_onlyip|pfil_bridge} but you are allowed > to enable them after. > > net.link.bridge.pfil_member=1 makes frames enter ruleset as incoming from bridge member, zero disables this pass. > > net.link.bridge.ipfw=1 makes frames enter ruleset again as incoming from bridge interface itself > without distinction of bridge member, and for forwarded frames enter ruleset one more time as outgoing from the bridge itself. > > And frame enters ruleset one MORE time as outgoing from bridge member if net.link.bridge.pfil_member=1. Hi Eugene, Thanks for your quick response! With current configs I have unexpected behavior when multicast received via unneeded vlan300 not blocked by rule 9000 and bad traffic bridged into all bridge members. So if when net.link.bridge.pfil_member=1 then I can check incoming and outgoing bridge members as expected? I'll try it later, thanks Is it possible the following config with net.link.bridge.pfil_member=1 ? table allow239 create type iface table allow239 add vlan400 3000 allow ip from any to 239.0.0.10 recv vlan100 xmit table(allow239) It's still very interesting to know full packet path via all interfaces (phy, vlan, bridge) and understand where/why ipfw triggered. For example why i need "allow via igb0"? It's because net.link.ether.ipfw=1? Can you explain it in details? Thanks again! -- CU Victor Gamov From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sat Oct 27 16:33:55 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 576C810CB264 for ; Sat, 27 Oct 2018 16:33:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Received: from hz.grosbein.net (hz.grosbein.net [IPv6:2a01:4f8:d12:604::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "hz.grosbein.net", Issuer "hz.grosbein.net" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BFBCA70E57 for ; Sat, 27 Oct 2018 16:33:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Received: from eg.sd.rdtc.ru (eg.sd.rdtc.ru [IPv6:2a03:3100:c:13:0:0:0:5]) by hz.grosbein.net (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id w9RGXmrx068861 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 27 Oct 2018 18:33:48 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) X-Envelope-From: eugen@grosbein.net X-Envelope-To: vit@otcnet.ru Received: from [10.58.0.4] ([10.58.0.4]) by eg.sd.rdtc.ru (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id w9RGXlsp068677 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Sat, 27 Oct 2018 23:33:47 +0700 (+07) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Subject: Re: ipfw on bridge connecting vlans To: Victor Gamov , freebsd-net@freebsd.org References: <36cd661e-ca54-be94-fd64-01ee768d5053@otcnet.ru> <9b8d8c04-8e3e-b148-8a08-135d6ac1785d@grosbein.net> <49c4193a-d38c-eff8-3ab8-25b103c2dcba@otcnet.ru> From: Eugene Grosbein Message-ID: <45f4881e-3a02-5a37-1e77-45b530460fad@grosbein.net> Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2018 23:33:40 +0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <49c4193a-d38c-eff8-3ab8-25b103c2dcba@otcnet.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,LOCAL_FROM,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Report: * -2.3 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record * 2.6 LOCAL_FROM From my domains X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on hz.grosbein.net X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2018 16:33:55 -0000 27.10.2018 23:26, Victor Gamov wrote: [skip] >> net.link.bridge.pfil_member=1 makes frames enter ruleset as incoming from bridge member, zero disables this pass. >> >> net.link.bridge.ipfw=1 makes frames enter ruleset again as incoming from bridge interface itself >> without distinction of bridge member, and for forwarded frames enter ruleset one more time as outgoing from the bridge itself. >> >> And frame enters ruleset one MORE time as outgoing from bridge member if net.link.bridge.pfil_member=1. (*) > With current configs I have unexpected behavior when multicast received via unneeded vlan300 not blocked by rule 9000 and bad traffic bridged into all bridge members. > > So if when net.link.bridge.pfil_member=1 then I can check incoming and outgoing bridge members as expected? I'll try it later, thanks > > > Is it possible the following config with net.link.bridge.pfil_member=1 ? Yes, it should be. > table allow239 create type iface > table allow239 add vlan400 > 3000 allow ip from any to 239.0.0.10 recv vlan100 xmit table(allow239) You also should add the "out" keyword to this rule for performance and clearness because only outgoing frames have "xmit" attribute to check, so this rule is not tried for incoming frames (it won't match them anyway). > It's still very interesting to know full packet path via all interfaces (phy, vlan, bridge) and understand where/why ipfw triggered. > For example why i need "allow via igb0"? It's because net.link.ether.ipfw=1? > Can you explain it in details? See above (*). From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sat Oct 27 17:48:03 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3E2210CDD27 for ; Sat, 27 Oct 2018 17:48:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vit@otcnet.ru) Received: from mail.otcnet.ru (mail.otcnet.ru [194.190.78.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40AFB742E0 for ; Sat, 27 Oct 2018 17:48:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vit@otcnet.ru) Received: from Victors-MacBook-Air-2.local (unknown [195.91.148.145]) by mail.otcnet.ru (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 248405967B9 for ; Sat, 27 Oct 2018 20:48:01 +0300 (MSK) Subject: Re: ipfw on bridge connecting vlans To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org References: <36cd661e-ca54-be94-fd64-01ee768d5053@otcnet.ru> <9b8d8c04-8e3e-b148-8a08-135d6ac1785d@grosbein.net> <49c4193a-d38c-eff8-3ab8-25b103c2dcba@otcnet.ru> <45f4881e-3a02-5a37-1e77-45b530460fad@grosbein.net> From: Victor Gamov Organization: OTCnet Message-ID: <64d0ceec-2d0c-9086-04e9-72a5f4f678c2@otcnet.ru> Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2018 20:48:02 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <45f4881e-3a02-5a37-1e77-45b530460fad@grosbein.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2018 17:48:03 -0000 On 27/10/2018 19:33, Eugene Grosbein wrote: > 27.10.2018 23:26, Victor Gamov wrote: > > [skip] > >>> net.link.bridge.pfil_member=1 makes frames enter ruleset as >>> incoming from bridge member, zero disables this pass. >>> >>> net.link.bridge.ipfw=1 makes frames enter ruleset again as >>> incoming from bridge interface itself without distinction of >>> bridge member, and for forwarded frames enter ruleset one more >>> time as outgoing from the bridge itself. >>> >>> And frame enters ruleset one MORE time as outgoing from bridge >>> member if net.link.bridge.pfil_member=1. > > (*) > >> With current configs I have unexpected behavior when multicast >> received via unneeded vlan300 not blocked by rule 9000 and bad >> traffic bridged into all bridge members. >> >> So if when net.link.bridge.pfil_member=1 then I can check incoming >> and outgoing bridge members as expected? I'll try it later, >> thanks >> >> >> Is it possible the following config with >> net.link.bridge.pfil_member=1 ? > > Yes, it should be. > >> table allow239 create type iface table allow239 add vlan400 3000 >> allow ip from any to 239.0.0.10 recv vlan100 xmit table(allow239) > > You also should add the "out" keyword to this rule for performance > and clearness because only outgoing frames have "xmit" attribute to > check, so this rule is not tried for incoming frames (it won't match > them anyway). > >> It's still very interesting to know full packet path via all >> interfaces (phy, vlan, bridge) and understand where/why ipfw >> triggered. For example why i need "allow via igb0"? It's because >> net.link.ether.ipfw=1? Can you explain it in details? > > See above (*). ok, frame path and ipfw as I see it. ===== 1000 allow ip from any to any via igb0 1002 allow ip from any to any via igb2 1100 deny ip from any to any mac-type 0x0806 via bridge2 1102 allow ip from any to any via bridge2 2000 allow ip from any to 239.0.0.10 in recv vlan200 4000 allow ip from any to 239.0.0.10 out xmit table(allow239) 9000 deny ip from any to any via table(block239) 65000 allow ip from any to any ===== 1. tagged frame come to physical interface igb0. As I have net.link.ether.ipfw=1 then tagged frame checked by IPFW and I need 1000 allow ip from any to any via igb0 Frame passed via igb0 and untagged. 2. untagged frame appears on vlan100. Now I can get it via `tcpdump -i vlan100` Frame checked by IPFW on vlan100 because net.link.bridge.pfil_member=1 AND vlan100 is a bridge member ( net.link.ether.ipfw=1 is irrelevant? ) So I can pass/block traffic here. 2000 allow ip from any to 239.0.0.10 in recv vlan100 9000 block ip from any to any via table(block239) Frame accepted on VLAN-100 3. frame (untagged but still ethernet frame not IP packet) appears on bridge2 as incoming and checked by IPFW due net.link.bridge.ipfw=1. I block ARP but allow all other frames (1100 + 1102) 4. frame appears on all bridge-member vlans. Frame checked by IPFW on vlan300/vlan400 because net.link.bridge.pfil_member=1 AND vlan300/vlan400 is a bridge member So I can pass/block traffic here. 4000 allow ip from any to 239.0.0.10 out xmit table(allow239) 9000 block ip from any to any via table(block239) Passed frames tagged 5. tagged frame appears on igb2 As I have net.link.ether.ipfw=1 then tagged frame checked by IPFW and I need 1002 allow ip from any to any via igb2 Is this scheme is correct? -- CU, Victor Gamov From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sat Oct 27 18:02:48 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83BE210CEED7 for ; Sat, 27 Oct 2018 18:02:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Received: from hz.grosbein.net (hz.grosbein.net [IPv6:2a01:4f8:d12:604::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "hz.grosbein.net", Issuer "hz.grosbein.net" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1794F7524E for ; Sat, 27 Oct 2018 18:02:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Received: from eg.sd.rdtc.ru (eg.sd.rdtc.ru [IPv6:2a03:3100:c:13:0:0:0:5]) by hz.grosbein.net (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id w9RI2dWI070169 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 27 Oct 2018 20:02:40 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) X-Envelope-From: eugen@grosbein.net X-Envelope-To: vit@otcnet.ru Received: from [10.58.0.4] ([10.58.0.4]) by eg.sd.rdtc.ru (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id w9RI2cxs070022 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Sun, 28 Oct 2018 01:02:38 +0700 (+07) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Subject: Re: ipfw on bridge connecting vlans To: Victor Gamov , freebsd-net@freebsd.org References: <36cd661e-ca54-be94-fd64-01ee768d5053@otcnet.ru> <9b8d8c04-8e3e-b148-8a08-135d6ac1785d@grosbein.net> <49c4193a-d38c-eff8-3ab8-25b103c2dcba@otcnet.ru> <45f4881e-3a02-5a37-1e77-45b530460fad@grosbein.net> <64d0ceec-2d0c-9086-04e9-72a5f4f678c2@otcnet.ru> From: Eugene Grosbein Message-ID: Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2018 01:02:32 +0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <64d0ceec-2d0c-9086-04e9-72a5f4f678c2@otcnet.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,LOCAL_FROM,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Report: * -2.3 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record * 2.6 LOCAL_FROM From my domains X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on hz.grosbein.net X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2018 18:02:48 -0000 28.10.2018 0:48, Victor Gamov wrote: > On 27/10/2018 19:33, Eugene Grosbein wrote: >> 27.10.2018 23:26, Victor Gamov wrote: >> >> [skip] >> >>>> net.link.bridge.pfil_member=1 makes frames enter ruleset as >>>> incoming from bridge member, zero disables this pass. >>>> >>>> net.link.bridge.ipfw=1 makes frames enter ruleset again as >>>> incoming from bridge interface itself without distinction of >>>> bridge member, and for forwarded frames enter ruleset one more >>>> time as outgoing from the bridge itself. >>>> >>>> And frame enters ruleset one MORE time as outgoing from bridge >>>> member if net.link.bridge.pfil_member=1. >> >> (*) >> >>> With current configs I have unexpected behavior when multicast >>> received via unneeded vlan300 not blocked by rule 9000 and bad >>> traffic bridged into all bridge members. >>> >>> So if when net.link.bridge.pfil_member=1 then I can check incoming >>> and outgoing bridge members as expected? I'll try it later, >>> thanks >>> >>> >>> Is it possible the following config with >>> net.link.bridge.pfil_member=1 ? >> >> Yes, it should be. >> >>> table allow239 create type iface table allow239 add vlan400 3000 >>> allow ip from any to 239.0.0.10 recv vlan100 xmit table(allow239) >> >> You also should add the "out" keyword to this rule for performance >> and clearness because only outgoing frames have "xmit" attribute to >> check, so this rule is not tried for incoming frames (it won't match >> them anyway). >> >>> It's still very interesting to know full packet path via all >>> interfaces (phy, vlan, bridge) and understand where/why ipfw >>> triggered. For example why i need "allow via igb0"? It's because >>> net.link.ether.ipfw=1? Can you explain it in details? >> >> See above (*). > > ok, frame path and ipfw as I see it. > > ===== > 1000 allow ip from any to any via igb0 > 1002 allow ip from any to any via igb2 > > 1100 deny ip from any to any mac-type 0x0806 via bridge2 > 1102 allow ip from any to any via bridge2 > > 2000 allow ip from any to 239.0.0.10 in recv vlan200 > > 4000 allow ip from any to 239.0.0.10 out xmit table(allow239) > > 9000 deny ip from any to any via table(block239) > > 65000 allow ip from any to any > ===== > > 1. tagged frame come to physical interface igb0. > As I have net.link.ether.ipfw=1 then tagged frame checked by IPFW and I need > 1000 allow ip from any to any via igb0 > > Frame passed via igb0 and untagged. > > > 2. untagged frame appears on vlan100. > Now I can get it via `tcpdump -i vlan100` > > Frame checked by IPFW on vlan100 because > net.link.bridge.pfil_member=1 AND vlan100 is a bridge member > ( net.link.ether.ipfw=1 is irrelevant? ) > > So I can pass/block traffic here. > 2000 allow ip from any to 239.0.0.10 in recv vlan100 > 9000 block ip from any to any via table(block239) > Frame accepted on VLAN-100 > > > 3. frame (untagged but still ethernet frame not IP packet) appears on bridge2 as incoming and checked by IPFW due net.link.bridge.ipfw=1. > > I block ARP but allow all other frames (1100 + 1102) > > > 4. frame appears on all bridge-member vlans. > Frame checked by IPFW on vlan300/vlan400 because > net.link.bridge.pfil_member=1 AND vlan300/vlan400 is a bridge member > > So I can pass/block traffic here. > 4000 allow ip from any to 239.0.0.10 out xmit table(allow239) > 9000 block ip from any to any via table(block239) > > Passed frames tagged > > > 5. tagged frame appears on igb2 > As I have net.link.ether.ipfw=1 then tagged frame checked by IPFW and I need > 1002 allow ip from any to any via igb2 > > > Is this scheme is correct? > > Almost right with one exception: bridge considers ARP (and REVARP) packets special and passed them through the ruleset only when sysctl net.link.bridge.ipfw_arp=1; From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sat Oct 27 18:09:46 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D29FB10CF34C for ; Sat, 27 Oct 2018 18:09:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vit@otcnet.ru) Received: from mail.otcnet.ru (mail.otcnet.ru [194.190.78.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 406E07577C for ; Sat, 27 Oct 2018 18:09:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vit@otcnet.ru) Received: from Victors-MacBook-Air-2.local (unknown [195.91.148.145]) by mail.otcnet.ru (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8DCD55967CC for ; Sat, 27 Oct 2018 21:09:44 +0300 (MSK) Subject: Re: ipfw on bridge connecting vlans To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org References: <36cd661e-ca54-be94-fd64-01ee768d5053@otcnet.ru> <9b8d8c04-8e3e-b148-8a08-135d6ac1785d@grosbein.net> <49c4193a-d38c-eff8-3ab8-25b103c2dcba@otcnet.ru> <45f4881e-3a02-5a37-1e77-45b530460fad@grosbein.net> <64d0ceec-2d0c-9086-04e9-72a5f4f678c2@otcnet.ru> From: Victor Gamov Organization: OTCnet Message-ID: <9326bc98-ec90-b68f-f08d-b2f021bb2f90@otcnet.ru> Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2018 21:09:46 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2018 18:09:46 -0000 On 27/10/2018 21:02, Eugene Grosbein wrote: > 28.10.2018 0:48, Victor Gamov wrote: > >> On 27/10/2018 19:33, Eugene Grosbein wrote: >>> 27.10.2018 23:26, Victor Gamov wrote: >>> >>> [skip] >>> >>>>> net.link.bridge.pfil_member=1 makes frames enter ruleset as >>>>> incoming from bridge member, zero disables this pass. >>>>> >>>>> net.link.bridge.ipfw=1 makes frames enter ruleset again as >>>>> incoming from bridge interface itself without distinction of >>>>> bridge member, and for forwarded frames enter ruleset one more >>>>> time as outgoing from the bridge itself. >>>>> >>>>> And frame enters ruleset one MORE time as outgoing from bridge >>>>> member if net.link.bridge.pfil_member=1. >>> >>> (*) >>> >>>> With current configs I have unexpected behavior when multicast >>>> received via unneeded vlan300 not blocked by rule 9000 and bad >>>> traffic bridged into all bridge members. >>>> >>>> So if when net.link.bridge.pfil_member=1 then I can check incoming >>>> and outgoing bridge members as expected? I'll try it later, >>>> thanks >>>> >>>> >>>> Is it possible the following config with >>>> net.link.bridge.pfil_member=1 ? >>> >>> Yes, it should be. >>> >>>> table allow239 create type iface table allow239 add vlan400 3000 >>>> allow ip from any to 239.0.0.10 recv vlan100 xmit table(allow239) >>> >>> You also should add the "out" keyword to this rule for performance >>> and clearness because only outgoing frames have "xmit" attribute to >>> check, so this rule is not tried for incoming frames (it won't match >>> them anyway). >>> >>>> It's still very interesting to know full packet path via all >>>> interfaces (phy, vlan, bridge) and understand where/why ipfw >>>> triggered. For example why i need "allow via igb0"? It's because >>>> net.link.ether.ipfw=1? Can you explain it in details? >>> >>> See above (*). >> >> ok, frame path and ipfw as I see it. >> >> ===== >> 1000 allow ip from any to any via igb0 >> 1002 allow ip from any to any via igb2 >> >> 1100 deny ip from any to any mac-type 0x0806 via bridge2 >> 1102 allow ip from any to any via bridge2 >> >> 2000 allow ip from any to 239.0.0.10 in recv vlan200 >> >> 4000 allow ip from any to 239.0.0.10 out xmit table(allow239) >> >> 9000 deny ip from any to any via table(block239) >> >> 65000 allow ip from any to any >> ===== >> >> 1. tagged frame come to physical interface igb0. >> As I have net.link.ether.ipfw=1 then tagged frame checked by IPFW and I need >> 1000 allow ip from any to any via igb0 >> >> Frame passed via igb0 and untagged. >> >> >> 2. untagged frame appears on vlan100. >> Now I can get it via `tcpdump -i vlan100` >> >> Frame checked by IPFW on vlan100 because >> net.link.bridge.pfil_member=1 AND vlan100 is a bridge member >> ( net.link.ether.ipfw=1 is irrelevant? ) >> >> So I can pass/block traffic here. >> 2000 allow ip from any to 239.0.0.10 in recv vlan100 >> 9000 block ip from any to any via table(block239) >> Frame accepted on VLAN-100 >> >> >> 3. frame (untagged but still ethernet frame not IP packet) appears on bridge2 as incoming and checked by IPFW due net.link.bridge.ipfw=1. >> >> I block ARP but allow all other frames (1100 + 1102) >> >> >> 4. frame appears on all bridge-member vlans. >> Frame checked by IPFW on vlan300/vlan400 because >> net.link.bridge.pfil_member=1 AND vlan300/vlan400 is a bridge member >> >> So I can pass/block traffic here. >> 4000 allow ip from any to 239.0.0.10 out xmit table(allow239) >> 9000 block ip from any to any via table(block239) >> >> Passed frames tagged >> >> >> 5. tagged frame appears on igb2 >> As I have net.link.ether.ipfw=1 then tagged frame checked by IPFW and I need >> 1002 allow ip from any to any via igb2 >> >> >> Is this scheme is correct? >> >> > > Almost right with one exception: bridge considers ARP (and REVARP) packets special > and passed them through the ruleset only when sysctl net.link.bridge.ipfw_arp=1; yes it enabled. Thanks Eugene! -- CU, Victor Gamov