From owner-ctm-users@freebsd.org Wed Nov 20 16:12:05 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ctm-users@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93D1C1BAB77 for ; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 16:12:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from slim.berklix.org (slim.berklix.org [94.185.90.68]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "slim.berklix.org", Issuer "slim.berklix.org" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47J74N3G9qz40c3 for ; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 16:12:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from mart.js.berklix.net (p2E52CDCB.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [46.82.205.203]) (authenticated bits=128) by slim.berklix.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id xAKGBtYE010345 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 20 Nov 2019 17:12:00 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (fire.js.berklix.net [192.168.91.41]) by mart.js.berklix.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id xAKGBtiu012730; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 17:11:55 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fire.js.berklix.net (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id xAKGBUox050710; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 17:11:42 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Message-Id: <201911201611.xAKGBUox050710@fire.js.berklix.net> To: Andrew Johnson cc: "Montgomery-Smith, Stephen" , "ctm-users@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: ports-cur From: "Julian H. Stacey" Organization: http://berklix.com/jhs http://stolenvotes.uk User-agent: EXMH on FreeBSD http://berklix.com/free/ X-From: http://www.berklix.org/~jhs/ In-reply-to: Your message "Fri, 15 Nov 2019 17:43:08 +1100." Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2019 17:11:30 +0100 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 47J74N3G9qz40c3 X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of jhs@berklix.com has no SPF policy when checking 94.185.90.68) smtp.mailfrom=jhs@berklix.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.80 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.84)[-0.838,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[berklix.com]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; HAS_ORG_HEADER(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[68.90.185.94.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.10.0]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.86)[-0.860,0]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:33824, ipnet:94.185.88.0/22, country:DE]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(0.00)[ip: (0.02), ipnet: 94.185.88.0/22(0.01), asn: 33824(-0.01), country: DE(-0.01)]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[203.205.82.46.khpj7ygk5idzvmvt5x4ziurxhy.zen.dq.spamhaus.net : 127.0.0.10] X-BeenThere: ctm-users@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: CTM User discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2019 16:12:05 -0000 Andrew Johnson wrote: > I can download from the ftp for a while. > Cross-fingers and wishing you the best, hoping they get all of the > little bugger. All the best Stephen ! Andrew & all, I abandoned personal use of the @freebsd.org lists for my CTM delta reception. I only use identical name lists on http://mailman.berklix.org/mailman/listinfo With identical content, The generator run on ctm.berklix.org, & mails to both mail lists. It will do you no harm (except wassted bandwidth) if you sub. both for a while & see if you have delivery failures from either. CTM generator server has these at Wed Nov 20 16:53:29 CET 2019: /pub/FreeBSD/development/CTM/src-4 src-4.2355.gz /pub/FreeBSD/development/CTM/src-5 src-5.0862.gz /pub/FreeBSD/development/CTM/src-6 src-6.1661.gz /pub/FreeBSD/development/CTM/src-7 src-7.1771.gz /pub/FreeBSD/development/CTM/src-8 src-8.1979.gz /pub/FreeBSD/development/CTM/src-9 src-9.1916.gz /pub/FreeBSD/development/CTM/src-10 src-10.2149.gz /pub/FreeBSD/development/CTM/src-11 src-11.1475.gz /pub/FreeBSD/development/CTM/src-12 src-12.0492.gz /pub/FreeBSD/development/CTM/src-cur src-cur.14287.gz /pub/FreeBSD/development/CTM/ports-cur ports-cur.13238.gz /pub/FreeBSD/development/CTM/svn-cur svn-cur.08207.xz I just got back from traveling, & updated my local ctm trees, to match the server (as personal mail delivery to my laptop was problematic while travelling). I will soon notice if mail delivery fails to update. If there's a CTM generator problem I could look at that later, though that's Stephen's expertise. Reference: http://ctm.berklix.org Cheers, Julian -- Julian Stacey, Consultant Sys. Eng. BSD Linux Unix, Munich Aachen Kent. http://berklix.com/jhs/cv/ http://stolenvotes.uk Ref stole 3.7M Brit votes abroad, 700K in EU; 2.4 M young no vote; 1.6 M died. From owner-ctm-users@freebsd.org Fri Nov 22 13:09:16 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ctm-users@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 993571B8182 for ; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 13:09:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from slim.berklix.org (slim.berklix.org [94.185.90.68]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "slim.berklix.org", Issuer "slim.berklix.org" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47KGwW49X7z3Hdc for ; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 13:09:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from mart.js.berklix.net (p2E52CDCB.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [46.82.205.203]) (authenticated bits=128) by slim.berklix.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id xAMD97BU028480 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 22 Nov 2019 14:09:11 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (fire.js.berklix.net [192.168.91.41]) by mart.js.berklix.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id xAMD96MA028718; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 14:09:06 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fire.js.berklix.net (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id xAMD8msh060656; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 14:09:00 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Message-Id: <201911221309.xAMD8msh060656@fire.js.berklix.net> cc: Andrew Johnson , "ctm-users@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: ports-cur From: "Julian H. Stacey" Organization: http://berklix.com/jhs http://stolenvotes.uk User-agent: EXMH on FreeBSD http://berklix.com/free/ X-From: http://www.berklix.org/~jhs/ In-reply-to: Your message "Wed, 20 Nov 2019 17:11:30 +0100." <201911201611.xAKGBUox050710@fire.js.berklix.net> Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2019 14:08:48 +0100 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 47KGwW49X7z3Hdc X-Spamd-Bar: ++++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of jhs@berklix.com has no SPF policy when checking 94.185.90.68) smtp.mailfrom=jhs@berklix.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [4.67 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[berklix.com]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.81)[0.815,0]; HAS_ORG_HEADER(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[68.90.185.94.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.10.0]; MISSING_TO(2.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.95)[0.950,0]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:33824, ipnet:94.185.88.0/22, country:DE]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(0.00)[ip: (0.02), ipnet: 94.185.88.0/22(0.01), asn: 33824(-0.01), country: DE(-0.01)] X-BeenThere: ctm-users@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: CTM User discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2019 13:09:16 -0000 Hi, Reference: > From: "Julian H. Stacey" > Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2019 17:11:30 +0100 > /pub/FreeBSD/development/CTM/ports-cur ports-cur.13238.gz > > I just got back from traveling, & updated my local ctm trees, to > match the server (as personal mail delivery to my laptop was > problematic while travelling). > > I will soon notice if mail delivery fails to update. If there's a > CTM generator problem I could look at that later, though that's > Stephen's expertise. With printenv TZ # Europe/Berlin (=+01:00) Server has -rw-r--r-- 1 sms ctm 15937 Nov 20 15:17 ports-cur.13238.gz -rw-r--r-- 1 sms ctm 20861 Nov 21 07:17 ports-cur.13239.gz -rw-r--r-- 1 sms ctm 25367 Nov 21 23:17 ports-cur.13240.gz My local PC has (later than server as intermitent PC connectivity) -r--r--r-- 1 mailnull mailnull 15937 Nov 20 15:36 ports-cur.13238.gz -r--r--r-- 1 mailnull mailnull 20861 Nov 21 11:47 ports-cur.13239.gz -r--r--r-- 1 mailnull mailnull 25367 Nov 22 12:00 ports-cur.13240.gz So No problem on CTM delta generator site, & the mail lists on http://mailman.berklix.org/mailman/listinfo If you are using old CTM delta mail lists from https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo I no longer receive them, no idea if they are problematic. Previously I lost too much time asking @freebsd.org to amend them, hence I created same lists on berklix.org. > Reference: http://ctm.berklix.org Cheers, Julian -- Julian Stacey, Consultant BSD Linux Unix, Munich Aachen Kent http://berklix.com Ref stole 3.7M Brit votes abroad, 700K in EU; 2.4 M young no vote; 1.6 M died. Liar PM, sycophant tories, looney lefties, eds & ads paid by Brexit speculators https://www.tactical-vote.uk/ http://stolenvotes.uk/#snouts_in_trough