From owner-freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Sun Jan 27 00:09:03 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAAC014B4146; Sun, 27 Jan 2019 00:09:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cy.schubert@cschubert.com) Received: from smtp-out-no.shaw.ca (smtp-out-no.shaw.ca [64.59.134.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "Client", Issuer "CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 74F5E7473C; Sun, 27 Jan 2019 00:09:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cy.schubert@cschubert.com) Received: from spqr.komquats.com ([70.67.125.17]) by shaw.ca with ESMTPA id nY0JgfKSvMRX3nY0KgKSlg; Sat, 26 Jan 2019 17:08:53 -0700 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.3 cv=TL87tGta c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=VFtTW3WuZNDh6VkGe7fA3g==:117 a=VFtTW3WuZNDh6VkGe7fA3g==:17 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=3JhidrIBZZsA:10 a=ymjG5ZiqAAAA:8 a=YxBL1-UpAAAA:8 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=AepeMRH6YHPCBhw5NfYA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=UJ0tAi3fqDAA:10 a=9NY4Jsdw3mG8vwb630s1:22 a=Ia-lj3WSrqcvXOmTRaiG:22 a=IjZwj45LgO3ly-622nXo:22 Received: from slippy.cwsent.com (slippy [10.1.1.91]) by spqr.komquats.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A2AC866; Sat, 26 Jan 2019 16:09:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from slippy.cwsent.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by slippy.cwsent.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x0R08ohh078601; Sat, 26 Jan 2019 16:08:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Cy.Schubert@cschubert.com) Received: from slippy (cy@localhost) by slippy.cwsent.com (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) with ESMTP id x0R08oGN078598; Sat, 26 Jan 2019 16:08:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Cy.Schubert@cschubert.com) Message-Id: <201901270008.x0R08oGN078598@slippy.cwsent.com> X-Authentication-Warning: slippy.cwsent.com: cy owned process doing -bs X-Mailer: exmh version 2.8.0 04/21/2012 with nmh-1.7.1 Reply-to: Cy Schubert From: Cy Schubert X-os: FreeBSD X-Sender: cy@cwsent.com X-URL: http://www.cschubert.com/ To: "Simon J. Gerraty" cc: Cy Schubert , freebsd-arch@freebsd.org, Baptiste Daroussin , arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Importing mksh in base In-Reply-To: Message from "Simon J. Gerraty" of "Sat, 26 Jan 2019 15:30:35 -0800." <79948.1548545435@kaos.jnpr.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2019 16:08:50 -0800 X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfE+XH9PNVU+YqNZs3xxvHzeZZRFixPxTW97FcnzNXiSQmwbbaQlISPljyJ0JiUuGDSWV9Iyrekvx5j7isE5pvZ9bqK+kd01VPSIW2KdoU76StMRZ3c/9 df/JMQArOlB68EEZ377ZtwbM2QEdNpnya+ij3d+HEQZFTPBAOvC3WETiw8mJa5KELk2uqC+J8zLwg/fF9IKt/y+nZX/IlG2yfzC8+8abqdVf45KWcpTtItjz ilsCJ9ErTcv0LNywfPwNJllf1+7DAczWA5H29psMi10= X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 74F5E7473C X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.55 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[Cy.Schubert@cschubert.com]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; IP_SCORE(-1.87)[ip: (-4.98), ipnet: 64.59.128.0/20(-2.42), asn: 6327(-1.87), country: CA(-0.09)]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; HAS_XAW(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; RCPT_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: spqr.komquats.com]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.97)[-0.966,0]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[17.125.67.70.zen.spamhaus.org : 127.0.0.11]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:6327, ipnet:64.59.128.0/20, country:CA]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[12.134.59.64.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.1] X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2019 00:09:03 -0000 In message <79948.1548545435@kaos.jnpr.net>, "Simon J. Gerraty" writes: > Cy Schubert wrote: > > Why not ksh93 instead? It is the original and authoritative Korn > > shell. EPL i > > Sure but my experience was (back in maybe 2000 or there abouts) it was lame > compared to pdksh ;-) emacs mode as crude, no interactive history > search. It was closed source then. AT&T and Sun had no interest in spending salaried time on a shell but times have now changed and ksh is open source. Check out the ksh93-devel port. -- Cheers, Cy Schubert FreeBSD UNIX: Web: http://www.FreeBSD.org The need of the many outweighs the greed of the few.