From owner-freebsd-erlang@freebsd.org Sun Mar 17 09:53:50 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-erlang@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5ECA1530EAF for ; Sun, 17 Mar 2019 09:53:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63DBD6FF15 for ; Sun, 17 Mar 2019 09:53:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 19C131530EAB; Sun, 17 Mar 2019 09:53:50 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: erlang@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 084DA1530EAA for ; Sun, 17 Mar 2019 09:53:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9FCEE6FF10 for ; Sun, 17 Mar 2019 09:53:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.ysv.freebsd.org (portscout.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD050ECEC for ; Sun, 17 Mar 2019 09:53:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.ysv.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.123]) by portscout.ysv.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x2H9rmg8014902 for ; Sun, 17 Mar 2019 09:53:48 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.ysv.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x2H9rmTE014901; Sun, 17 Mar 2019 09:53:48 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201903170953.x2H9rmTE014901@portscout.ysv.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.ysv.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2019 09:53:48 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: erlang@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-erlang@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Support of Erlang-related ports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2019 09:53:50 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/erlang@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ devel/elixir-csv | 2.1.1 | v2.3.0 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Thanks. From owner-freebsd-erlang@freebsd.org Thu Mar 21 13:45:03 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-erlang@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7721D1540F32 for ; Thu, 21 Mar 2019 13:45:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from feld@FreeBSD.org) Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF55F8C115 for ; Thu, 21 Mar 2019 13:45:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from feld@FreeBSD.org) Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08A6824271 for ; Thu, 21 Mar 2019 09:45:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: from imap38 ([10.202.2.88]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 21 Mar 2019 09:45:02 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=HZk+Tx gy6ORmbrVTndZknuXJYrjMI+APIm30cOz4qhY=; b=gwomzXqej12sNblP9axgCI x5le5wzGWINFj2OBvP7hnudwF5JVYLk+mz8FPE41WeUjc3xaiJxb1VXonyL7u4rB COH1k9qTGW7N21I7shLf58njXiZuBNIsr7ofm0nW3LdG5ZUTqxl0idVc0yJGBwXO 7xJAxlQmrvalOJF4H+9lDhweisuN9grTD/w4skCmHqi5qfKTgHH0aZxq+hHFZM5H n0e65nzTqVA5hs198mzwc28W+VeAcVoK6Yn+v7R0k4UOTsrNFZ57IqcOaMLMtnE1 3/PoqVRxLpufb5DKf9T5ehRmYCHrL4OiAkw6V6kcAhNvMDqqFD4ZtjH/OckAHMqA == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedutddrieelgdegudcutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepofgfggfkjghffffhvffutgesthdtre dtreertdenucfhrhhomhepfdforghrkhcuhfgvlhguvghrfdcuoehfvghlugeshfhrvggv uefuffdrohhrgheqnecuffhomhgrihhnpehfrhgvvggsshgurdhorhhgnecurfgrrhgrmh epmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehfvghlugeshfhrvggvuefuffdrohhrghenucevlhhushhtvghr ufhiiigvpedt X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 427FC3A5DF; Thu, 21 Mar 2019 09:45:01 -0400 (EDT) X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.1.5-976-g376b1f3-fmstable-20190314v3 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Me-Personality: 22708813 Message-Id: <6a89d758-317d-41a7-819e-2dba1977ea7c@www.fastmail.com> In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2019 09:45:00 -0400 From: "Mark Felder" To: freebsd-erlang@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is there a timeline for making 20 the current version of erlang? Content-Type: text/plain X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: DF55F8C115 X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.99 / 15.00]; local_wl_from(0.00)[FreeBSD.org]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.999,0]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.99)[-0.994,0]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; ASN(0.00)[asn:11403, ipnet:66.111.4.0/24, country:US] X-BeenThere: freebsd-erlang@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Support of Erlang-related ports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2019 13:45:03 -0000 I submitted a review to do this a while ago as part of upgrading Elixir to 1.8.x https://reviews.freebsd.org/D19080 I don't understand why there's such hesitation to move on from OTP 19, which people should really stop using. OTP 20 has massive improvements and even OTP 22-rc1 is already out. On Mon, Mar 11, 2019, at 23:56, Kim Shrier wrote: > Hello, > > Was wondering if this was planned or if there are any issues preventing it. > > Thank you, > Kim > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-erlang@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-erlang > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-erlang-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- Mark Felder ports-secteam & portmgr member feld@FreeBSD.org From owner-freebsd-erlang@freebsd.org Thu Mar 21 15:33:42 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-erlang@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1CA115455C4 for ; Thu, 21 Mar 2019 15:33:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dch@skunkwerks.at) Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 03F5869DDE; Thu, 21 Mar 2019 15:33:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dch@skunkwerks.at) Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id A884421E5F; Thu, 21 Mar 2019 11:33:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: from imap6 ([10.202.2.56]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 21 Mar 2019 11:33:33 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=skunkwerks.at; h=mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to:references:date:from:to :subject:content-type; s=fm1; bh=dnRlWLTChCnohwpQBhwk7zQPFuRWzUZ lgmlaV7GDaEU=; b=Q5tCbPXxASeMfqpUHLVj2VaTXtkN1WgN1dgP2LzmP3vA2hm 2TBBjqZ7uoqtAWGvY/q8ZeAJyn/DADJCG0itrSF13i1gTakgUiZS4jen3pRTAjfm qFUr4mjfLzgm0Ff4dFwex/6E/2SKFNna/YDm5gFRGVyR44q0BE3e+EbGpk2fQun+ hbhnaDLsB7Qn8M3GzZaYf6KuJtXPCgwonyCgZxuFMzaagn0DrTzYjatanSTH+8kE ZPc+XBU/J8+++EHbjloJ3SVRZTQUlfke6Jks1NmGfljzhPH+3tuW9gXJ0tpSg36i 46bOCgZNAG0inKA08v0Jkqay0kTJAZCKIL+CbYw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=dnRlWL TChCnohwpQBhwk7zQPFuRWzUZlgmlaV7GDaEU=; b=G/ItRTYgDwFvJvmVe/zn4l gnyfE9EwIIZ4ksQBx1O7m3Gdn8n6CcQ4pYZF6dV6tGtYJIkX8A/9mk+aY51JZjfu G5OFIpXmg0NepqXB1/BxKip4h1Hqv+tx4+6jtfNpYuqX/s2jaLuBKckr5jq3lAHa JADh+5s9fwoJElRZ1SNlO+Zpu+YMGqMI0qyjTxU266TCR/CEI+XGOTwnVgxF8t/s LnKuNoyjTrsIM5iwko8nsSHhAp6jRb5iRbxkMO0gWetCnMGSvcgAlxPeKCP9NnVn JZRDwmXrDyqSL2XulT4O0SemYbU9k/L0wc1hz3qhLMvkZSkPAZbYdn2ypjWMdtSQ == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedutddrieelgdeifecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefofgggkfgjfhffhffvufgtsegrtderreerreejnecuhfhrohhmpedfffgrvhgv ucevohhtthhlvghhuhgsvghrfdcuoegutghhsehskhhunhhkfigvrhhkshdrrghtqeenuc ffohhmrghinhepfhhrvggvsghsugdrohhrghenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhep uggthhesshhkuhhnkhifvghrkhhsrdgrthenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedt X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 0A61D8214E; Thu, 21 Mar 2019 11:33:33 -0400 (EDT) X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.1.5-976-g376b1f3-fmstable-20190314v3 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Me-Personality: 20903217 Message-Id: <1b1cdd3f-67fb-4710-8474-c880ea6cf6c7@www.fastmail.com> In-Reply-To: <6a89d758-317d-41a7-819e-2dba1977ea7c@www.fastmail.com> References: <6a89d758-317d-41a7-819e-2dba1977ea7c@www.fastmail.com> Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2019 11:33:32 -0400 From: "Dave Cottlehuber" To: freebsd-erlang@freebsd.org, "Mark Felder" Subject: Re: Is there a timeline for making 20 the current version of erlang? X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 03F5869DDE X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=skunkwerks.at header.s=fm1 header.b=Q5tCbPXx; dkim=pass header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm2 header.b=G/ItRTYg; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of dch@skunkwerks.at designates 66.111.4.29 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=dch@skunkwerks.at X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.07 / 15.00]; XM_UA_NO_VERSION(0.01)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:66.111.4.29]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; URI_COUNT_ODD(1.00)[3]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[skunkwerks.at:+,messagingengine.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[in2-smtp.messagingengine.com,in1-smtp.messagingengine.com,in2-smtp.messagingengine.com,in1-smtp.messagingengine.com,in2-smtp.messagingengine.com,in1-smtp.messagingengine.com]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.91)[-0.907,0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(-3.56)[ip: (-9.70), ipnet: 66.111.4.0/24(-4.60), asn: 11403(-3.43), country: US(-0.07)]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:11403, ipnet:66.111.4.0/24, country:US]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[29.4.111.66.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.1]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[skunkwerks.at:s=fm1,messagingengine.com:s=fm2]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[skunkwerks.at]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_WWW(0.50)[] Content-Type: text/plain;charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-erlang@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Support of Erlang-related ports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2019 15:33:43 -0000 On Thu, 21 Mar 2019, at 14:45, Mark Felder wrote: > I submitted a review to do this a while ago as part of upgrading Elixi= r to 1.8.x >=20 > https://reviews.freebsd.org/D19080 >=20 > I don't understand why there's such hesitation to move on from OTP 19,= which people should really stop using. OTP 20 has massive improvements = and even OTP 22-rc1 is already out. In general I concur. It=E2=80=99s easy enough to prepend the path and us= e OTP21 already of course. There are 2 comments and a simpler elixir implementation awaiting your f= eedback, I=E2=80=99ve used a sweet sweet shim instead. Jimmy has a git based build which makes updating a lot simpler perhaps y= ou can give that a whirl? https://reviews.freebsd.org/D19606 We could turn it up to 20 directly imo. A+ Dave