From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sun Feb 3 04:54:04 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAD3014B55FB for ; Sun, 3 Feb 2019 04:54:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68AEE83212 for ; Sun, 3 Feb 2019 04:54:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 27A6614B55F1; Sun, 3 Feb 2019 04:54:03 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1611114B55F0 for ; Sun, 3 Feb 2019 04:54:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A71BA83208 for ; Sun, 3 Feb 2019 04:54:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E02DF10558 for ; Sun, 3 Feb 2019 04:54:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x134s190079527 for ; Sun, 3 Feb 2019 04:54:01 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x134s1te079524 for net@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 3 Feb 2019 04:54:01 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 235031] [em] em0: poor NFS performance, strange behavior Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2019 04:54:00 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: IntelNetworking, regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: eugen@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2019 04:54:04 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D235031 --- Comment #28 from Eugene Grosbein --- (In reply to Rick Macklem from comment #27) Hardware-assisted TSO itself may be not useful in case of 1Gbps or less linerate for multiple reasons: overwhelming horsepower of modern (and even pretty old modern) amd64 CPUs, NFS mounts over UDP, extensive use of ipfw nat/libalias for routed jails/guest virtual machines as libalias is not compartible with TSO etc. So when not dealing with 40Gbps or faster hardwar= e, I choose to disable TSO per-interface and not fight against corresponding bug= s. As for NIC rings, even pretty old Intel Gigabit have tunnables to setup big enough rings to not bother of this issue. Again, even old Intel Gigabit NICs have multiple interrupt tunnables to set= up right timings for local traffic profile. As for testing different client mount option sets, I'll try it later and respond. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=