From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Sep 15 00:44:15 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83DFDD4991 for ; Sun, 15 Sep 2019 00:44:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from w.schwarzenfeld@utanet.at) Received: from taro.utanet.at (taro.utanet.at [IPv6:2001:938:1337:25::25:45]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46W9cG4nYpz4g4q for ; Sun, 15 Sep 2019 00:44:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from w.schwarzenfeld@utanet.at) Received: from paris-s.drei.host ([213.90.36.62]) by taro.utanet.at with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1i9IeB-0000qY-9a for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Sun, 15 Sep 2019 02:44:11 +0200 Received: from 80-121-61-109.adsl.highway.telekom.at ([80.121.61.109] helo=[10.0.0.93]) by paris-s.drei.host with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1i9IeB-0003Eu-4C for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Sun, 15 Sep 2019 02:44:11 +0200 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <20190914142937.69265737@dismail.de> Subject: Re: netsurf From: Walter Schwarzenfeld Message-ID: <5f7137f2-6881-970c-2369-49711e588217@utanet.at> Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2019 02:44:08 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190914142937.69265737@dismail.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US X-H3G-Authenticated-As: cf62768e218b4d81d95cc5390f1bd9dfc8b05683 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46W9cG4nYpz4g4q X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of w.schwarzenfeld@utanet.at designates 2001:938:1337:25::25:45 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=w.schwarzenfeld@utanet.at X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.40 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[109.61.121.80.khpj7ygk5idzvmvt5x4ziurxhy.zen.dq.spamhaus.net : 127.0.0.11]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2001:938:1337:25::/64]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[utanet.at]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE_FREEMAIL(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[utanet.at]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; IP_SCORE(0.00)[ip: (-9.47), ipnet: 2001:938::/32(-4.74), asn: 8437(-3.75), country: AT(-0.10)]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[5.4.0.0.5.2.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.5.2.0.0.7.3.3.1.8.3.9.0.1.0.0.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.1]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[utanet.at]; ASN(0.00)[asn:8437, ipnet:2001:938::/32, country:AT]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2019 00:44:15 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232799 Seems we found a solution. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Sep 15 05:09:57 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5CE5E09CE for ; Sun, 15 Sep 2019 05:09:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jktrigg@gmail.com) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46WHVs4NTZz3yk1 for ; Sun, 15 Sep 2019 05:09:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jktrigg@gmail.com) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 966DBE09CD; Sun, 15 Sep 2019 05:09:57 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9634AE09CC for ; Sun, 15 Sep 2019 05:09:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jktrigg@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qk1-x72c.google.com (mail-qk1-x72c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::72c]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46WHVr68X1z3yk0 for ; Sun, 15 Sep 2019 05:09:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jktrigg@gmail.com) Received: by mail-qk1-x72c.google.com with SMTP id x134so32714496qkb.0 for ; Sat, 14 Sep 2019 22:09:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:to:from:subject:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=JrxyUYg5PqcfD2Qq1hFMMhm+tLMPUEXTsPiueecCnkM=; b=oPn9YW1iOzhLndSM50pl/x01KGKT3ano+HxJi1EJ3ClTsRHTmksANPeEIMO8SX2cIL L/2bszfiVuh7EsLRA9WQwu9OXQ4uaRDmNibwcHo0/9fb+wNBnNX58y6yyyQOQrWckNA1 uonuR0srmhXw8jjTUSbGN8eWaumb1Ujw9p+Wit4XsoLmc89tXbW8Qh/g3+gv+tIsX+T7 4mAUB9pb29QE6lkNGCCQvQmRJfwC9videobH8Nt7BIH1BT615sc2ZqrqXJyjpHkvxxkr kfOaV1aiWfhNhCPLEG8DTL4E2ZSTENY+kumfsPxAuLOB6mymgqHAYGFlzije2jRKkcfw I+eg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:to:from:subject:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=JrxyUYg5PqcfD2Qq1hFMMhm+tLMPUEXTsPiueecCnkM=; b=YYcuOF3y+V509ZMMzKnQ7US2qwuVwR0G1sO0YKF4N+/Yxb6hDYDmjCf5JTPB8OcNS2 mYDpw32Yc65FnQlu2U1VE/r4ycMlPzi5U28iExWmgtPdYzWbfbK/R1c8+h+WWq9e5f0L hpoq3IIJtoMzXdtKrau/kVz9MxMXQI3ATWS7aXF0zX7BNh2tOUYN8XjUwvdgUT0TPtv9 RMCkmiGgyqtQR/LO6nz2RLew0aM3DtiiwNrew6Ct2QZ9kxSidYJb1kITYpVhQVUACsws 33iOyB4bVy0sHQ+bZBhx5Rt2E8ZkfvNZ58y3+fwO4W8lYV/AIQ3YtQMoc1KPj7Dz12fY xZTg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXqL7Aq1bnTRMVJWyICuNSIE8Mq8itDvK9f/iqyOViUTInKXYyL BPgMF133kmJagChwvlb63dhLfm4p X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyLlh3KcIPYZtVUogwAnImJUEj7nb5Q+EkpQMguOyv8YZRP/2AV/1XAkGKr/+XWKH/eQokMBQ== X-Received: by 2002:a37:a612:: with SMTP id p18mr52423850qke.56.1568524195542; Sat, 14 Sep 2019 22:09:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2601:140:8400:4e61:e581:81c6:8019:f9dc? ([2601:140:8400:4e61:e581:81c6:8019:f9dc]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id p7sm4638406qkc.21.2019.09.14.22.09.54 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 14 Sep 2019 22:09:54 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Jim Trigg To: "ports@FreeBSD.org Ports" From: Jim Trigg Subject: Problem with nginx Message-ID: <3e8abe50-e642-87bd-856b-e9e5ddf10369@michaelines.net> Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2019 01:09:53 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46WHVr68X1z3yk0 X-Spamd-Bar: ----- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=oPn9YW1i; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of jktrigg@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::72c as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=jktrigg@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-5.06 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[ports@freebsd.org]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; IP_SCORE(-2.86)[ip: (-9.32), ipnet: 2607:f8b0::/32(-2.70), asn: 15169(-2.24), country: US(-0.05)]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[c.2.7.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.0.0.4.6.8.4.0.b.8.f.7.0.6.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[jtrigg@michaelines.net,jktrigg@gmail.com]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[jtrigg@michaelines.net,jktrigg@gmail.com]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2019 05:09:57 -0000 When I try to build nginx using poudriere, I get an error in mod_zip even though I've made sure that HTTP_ZIP is unset. How can I correct this? /wrkdirs/usr/ports/www/nginx/work/mod_zip-74ef235/ngx_http_zip_module.c:74:4: error: no member named 'charset' in '' offsetof(ngx_http_zip_conf_t, charset), ^ ~~~~~~~ /usr/include/stddef.h:75:31: note: expanded from macro 'offsetof' #define offsetof(type, field) __offsetof(type, field) ^ ~~~~~ /usr/include/sys/cdefs.h:476:34: note: expanded from macro '__offsetof' #define __offsetof(type, field) __builtin_offsetof(type, field) ^ ~~~~~ 1 error generated. *** Error code 1 Stop. make[2]: stopped in /wrkdirs/usr/ports/www/nginx/work/nginx-1.16.1 *** Error code 1 Stop. make[1]: stopped in /wrkdirs/usr/ports/www/nginx/work/nginx-1.16.1 *** Error code 1 Stop. make: stopped in /usr/ports/www/nginx =>> Cleaning up wrkdir ===> Cleaning for nginx-1.16.1_2,2 build of www/nginx | nginx-1.16.1_2,2 ended at Sat Sep 14 23:20:55 EDT 2019 build time: 00:02:36 !!! build failure encountered !!! Thanks, Jim Trigg From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Sep 15 06:31:44 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCDC9E2E35 for ; Sun, 15 Sep 2019 06:31:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46WKKD4hDvz42fZ for ; Sun, 15 Sep 2019 06:31:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id A0B84E2E33; Sun, 15 Sep 2019 06:31:44 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A06EAE2E32 for ; Sun, 15 Sep 2019 06:31:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46WKKD3rLnz42fY for ; Sun, 15 Sep 2019 06:31:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (portscout.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 67402439C for ; Sun, 15 Sep 2019 06:31:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x8F6Viuc091145; Sun, 15 Sep 2019 06:31:44 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201909150631.x8F6Viuc091145@portscout.nyi.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.nyi.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2019 06:31:44 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2019 06:31:44 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ multimedia/minitube | 2.9 | 3.2 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ multimedia/shotcut | 19.08.16 | v19.09.14 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Thanks. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Sep 16 06:25:44 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74C04F4F63 for ; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 06:25:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46Wx7r2XqLz4Cf5 for ; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 06:25:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 573EFF4F61; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 06:25:44 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57090F4F60 for ; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 06:25:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46Wx7r1hJXz4Cf0 for ; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 06:25:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (portscout.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0DD451C34B for ; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 06:25:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x8G6PiU0099994; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 06:25:44 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201909160625.x8G6PiU0099994@portscout.nyi.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.nyi.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2019 06:25:44 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2019 06:25:44 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ math/py-plastex | 1.0.0 | 2.0 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Thanks. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Sep 16 14:21:14 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D774F1237C2 for ; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 14:21:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from meta@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46X7hV5QzMz3Dyn for ; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 14:21:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from meta@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id B89901237C1; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 14:21:14 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B84A71237BF; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 14:21:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from meta@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [96.47.72.83]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46X7hV4TCQz3Dyl; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 14:21:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from meta@FreeBSD.org) Received: from icepick.vmeta.jp (unknown [IPv6:2405:6586:2280:1200:c05f:f3ff:f812:e85a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: meta/mail) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 52884C7DA; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 14:21:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from meta@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2019 23:21:10 +0900 From: Koichiro Iwao To: Steve Wills Cc: ports@freebsd.org, ruby@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FLAVORS for Ruby Message-ID: <20190916142109.3eleosnwqhovp3bo@icepick.vmeta.jp> References: <20190913074519.xfu3avb4ihmfzm2o@icepick.vmeta.jp> <20190913090645.buutinhgh2pygb4h@icepick.vmeta.jp> <8922b3a9-e433-7a6e-e4e5-29f22fbbfb88@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8922b3a9-e433-7a6e-e4e5-29f22fbbfb88@FreeBSD.org> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 12.1-PRERELEASE amd64 User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2019 14:21:14 -0000 On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 09:14:01AM -0400, Steve Wills wrote: > We provide multiple versions of Ruby, it would make sense to provide gems > for each version. In fact, I worked on this but never finished it: > > https://reviews.freebsd.org/D13333 > > Steve That's nice. I will do anything that I can so if you need help. What should we start from with that to continute? -- meta From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Sep 16 14:34:08 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05061123D1E for ; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 14:34:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from meta@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46X7zM6LNzz3Fvt for ; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 14:34:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from meta@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id D97CD123D1C; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 14:34:07 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9367123D1B; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 14:34:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from meta@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [96.47.72.83]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46X7zM5Ptyz3Fvs; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 14:34:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from meta@FreeBSD.org) Received: from icepick.vmeta.jp (unknown [IPv6:2405:6586:2280:1200:c05f:f3ff:f812:e85a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: meta/mail) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5BA32CA0E; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 14:34:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from meta@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2019 23:34:01 +0900 From: Koichiro Iwao To: Antoine Brodin Cc: FreeBSD Ports , ruby@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FLAVORS for Ruby Message-ID: <20190916143401.xq5y4iulnurowo7o@icepick.vmeta.jp> References: <20190913074519.xfu3avb4ihmfzm2o@icepick.vmeta.jp> <20190913090645.buutinhgh2pygb4h@icepick.vmeta.jp> <20190914042738.r3hedyqtpxsxnd5e@icepick.vmeta.jp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 12.1-PRERELEASE amd64 User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2019 14:34:08 -0000 On Sat, Sep 14, 2019 at 08:39:12AM +0200, Antoine Brodin wrote: > On Sat, Sep 14, 2019 at 6:27 AM Koichiro Iwao wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 09:33:43AM -0600, Adam Weinberger wrote: > > > Systems MUST be able to support concurrent installations of python2.7 > > > and actual python. What is your use case for concurrent ruby? > > > > I know the importance of Python 2. Even if it is EoL-ed, it will be > > required over the next a few years because not a few applications don't > > migrate to Python 3. So that's true and reasonable. > > > > Excuse me that I'm answering your question with a question. What about > > PHP? Concurrent installation is a MUST? > > > > FreeBSD ports allows concurrent installations of multiple Ruby versions > > however doesn't allow concurrent installations of rubygems for multiple > > Ruby versions. This inconsistency is the issue for me. > > This isn't a valid reason for me. > Why do you need ruby version 2.4 or 2.5 concurrently installed with version 2.6? > Is there a bug in version 2.6? You don't understand the issue. The necessity of concurrent Ruby versions isn't the issue. The inconsistency is the issue. If rubygems cannot be installed for multiple ruby versions, FreeBSD ports shouldn't allow to install multiple versions of Ruby. You have doubts about installing multiple ruby versions concurrently, you should also have doubts about why multiple ruby ruby can be installed concurrently Disabling multiple ruby Alternatively, Python 3.5 and 3.6 can be installed concurrently and py- ports can be installed concurrently for each python versions. -- meta From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Sep 16 14:39:33 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB5C9123F6F for ; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 14:39:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from meta@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46X85d5s4gz3GPK for ; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 14:39:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from meta@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id C730B123F6E; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 14:39:33 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6DE9123F6C; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 14:39:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from meta@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [96.47.72.83]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46X85d4wRBz3GPH; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 14:39:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from meta@FreeBSD.org) Received: from icepick.vmeta.jp (unknown [IPv6:2405:6586:2280:1200:c05f:f3ff:f812:e85a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: meta/mail) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6C656CA0F; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 14:39:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from meta@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2019 23:39:29 +0900 From: Koichiro Iwao To: Adam Weinberger Cc: FreeBSD Ports , ruby@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FLAVORS for Ruby Message-ID: <20190916143929.z6vnzoqjme6vw2ey@icepick.vmeta.jp> References: <20190913074519.xfu3avb4ihmfzm2o@icepick.vmeta.jp> <20190913090645.buutinhgh2pygb4h@icepick.vmeta.jp> <20190914042738.r3hedyqtpxsxnd5e@icepick.vmeta.jp> <006FCB74-04EB-4A82-A800-6C7CA273E749@adamw.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <006FCB74-04EB-4A82-A800-6C7CA273E749@adamw.org> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 12.1-PRERELEASE amd64 User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2019 14:39:34 -0000 On Sat, Sep 14, 2019 at 10:52:45AM -0600, Adam Weinberger wrote: > The issue is that FLAVORS has added a substantial (and painful) complexity to python ports and python.mk. It means that a number of people have had to be hyper-vigilant and watch commits closely to catch errors introduced when people utilize the paradigm incorrectly. It’s a bitter pill, but it’s accepted because the use-case for multiple concurrent python versions is essential. > > As Antoine said, inconsistency isn’t a strong enough use case. Which brings us back to the original question: is there a specific use-case for concurrent ruby that makes the substantial increase in cognitive load, complexity, and monitoring worth it? PHP also have FLAVORS. What about PHP? Multiple concurrent PHP versions is essential? -- meta From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Sep 16 14:54:36 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AACEE12482B for ; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 14:54:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adamw@adamw.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46X8R01zQsz3Ht6 for ; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 14:54:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adamw@adamw.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 41F2D124824; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 14:54:36 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41B3B124823 for ; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 14:54:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adamw@adamw.org) Received: from mail-wr1-x42b.google.com (mail-wr1-x42b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42b]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46X8Qz1Qd6z3Ht2 for ; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 14:54:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adamw@adamw.org) Received: by mail-wr1-x42b.google.com with SMTP id b9so5644799wrs.0 for ; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 07:54:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=adamw-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=sK+r8jJlSYKP85NPsoBtby+o5DDWzE1RV0g+cdHr+J8=; b=Z23cWadAAI1CPW8HItMm+G5Db5iscpJ9xGt4kjHLANYOKeQRw9on0y3ekORkQ3+0sd HYzQ6CqpqMhnuXbqDFad7iyBJ+k7+v9BejWQY8AeqUlkvtNds6QhVfv6Wz+XMsJgLeuX 2icrqjhbZvm49pyAmJaF0gRfCWVHGa2Ez4u4Zy93fVxhvQ55ImmssdvaWwQ5o+NV6/bc fv+7mwC5brNLrQszpO9s4zTloX5GH/Jmfp/8gZt1XhsxtZnwqy4OK6DQJ2DACA53sYOX SniTTi0wgF0R838EmqGdbGAemYEzrhaN6qjzlc1HQL5WBtoUE1Njz3ignHBSUMgqxZJl qC/g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=sK+r8jJlSYKP85NPsoBtby+o5DDWzE1RV0g+cdHr+J8=; b=s9dLshK4wtmr2y6FVDQZGpA36ZP5if2YKxcyWYminwUcPu/zpgo+byTjXz+YSOXAhB vJIQszHk8qaRvRSJD4u2jWb8gnUHaaVu6OYfqzX6mbpbkdvfJ1zkU2K8qIm/SsVgBNEN 7vBUVqFMgzysGxA4aDQ0rHvOhammWA9RC/hH1D0ZTfDD/pHzmLIlvU4/8T4O0jW8kJCh qcCAlMVZ9SRR3HItkO4bH2W+Z9me4Q9rAUsAOnIh7jC1Enh2t4w6vAgfTlRykstUp4Df Rw/uMkWFs+rs1TZ1RJi2sAEZsdgVrPUGzTjeMqZYdU0S+SJDpFfW2HLtcprdrxjDwZTh 9vZA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAX0EoHs55fofT/RZi2mGwQx2b1RP2gIbXVkDJ9KMp67fFq14mx4 5oyg7NvXlS+bie0mTtuiPpdRF9eV+NGva2M2tXYyO3svxR4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyX4Vq8Wknaz8bJBJGzGwoViEQalccOqteKszR+CyuOTJ69lkuDw4WrZkcdtZzT0o33TJUtoB4/XBINEpWtR5I= X-Received: by 2002:adf:dfc4:: with SMTP id q4mr178457wrn.54.1568645673518; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 07:54:33 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190913074519.xfu3avb4ihmfzm2o@icepick.vmeta.jp> <20190913090645.buutinhgh2pygb4h@icepick.vmeta.jp> <20190914042738.r3hedyqtpxsxnd5e@icepick.vmeta.jp> <006FCB74-04EB-4A82-A800-6C7CA273E749@adamw.org> <20190916143929.z6vnzoqjme6vw2ey@icepick.vmeta.jp> In-Reply-To: <20190916143929.z6vnzoqjme6vw2ey@icepick.vmeta.jp> From: Adam Weinberger Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2019 08:54:17 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: FLAVORS for Ruby To: Koichiro Iwao Cc: FreeBSD Ports , ruby@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46X8Qz1Qd6z3Ht2 X-Spamd-Bar: ----- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=adamw-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=Z23cWadA; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of adamw@adamw.org designates 2a00:1450:4864:20::42b as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=adamw@adamw.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-5.41 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[adamw-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com:s=20150623]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a00:1450:4000::/36]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[ports@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[adamw.org]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[adamw-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com:+]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[b.2.4.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.0.0.4.6.8.4.0.5.4.1.0.0.a.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; IP_SCORE(-2.91)[ip: (-9.33), ipnet: 2a00:1450::/32(-2.95), asn: 15169(-2.24), country: US(-0.05)]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2a00:1450::/32, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2019 14:54:36 -0000 On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 8:39 AM Koichiro Iwao wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 14, 2019 at 10:52:45AM -0600, Adam Weinberger wrote: > > The issue is that FLAVORS has added a substantial (and painful) complex= ity to python ports and python.mk. It means that a number of people have ha= d to be hyper-vigilant and watch commits closely to catch errors introduced= when people utilize the paradigm incorrectly. It=E2=80=99s a bitter pill, = but it=E2=80=99s accepted because the use-case for multiple concurrent pyth= on versions is essential. > > > > As Antoine said, inconsistency isn=E2=80=99t a strong enough use case. = Which brings us back to the original question: is there a specific use-case= for concurrent ruby that makes the substantial increase in cognitive load,= complexity, and monitoring worth it? > > PHP also have FLAVORS. What about PHP? Multiple concurrent PHP versions > is essential? We're going in circles here. I've for the third time now that what we'd need to get on board is a use case, a description of the end-user problem that we're trying to solve. What you've provided (for the fourth time in this thread) is a straw man argument. What other languages have is irrelevant. We are much less concerned with "consistency" than with solving end-user problems in a way that fits the specific use case. Steve seemed interested in the idea. I'd explore it with him, and I hope you are able to make it happen. I'm done here. # Adam --=20 Adam Weinberger adamw@adamw.org https://www.adamw.org From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Sep 16 16:16:58 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0863E126A0D for ; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 16:16:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from meta@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46XBG16Vctz3NZr for ; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 16:16:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from meta@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id DB430126A0B; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 16:16:57 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAECD126A09; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 16:16:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from meta@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [96.47.72.83]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46XBG15SKYz3NZp; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 16:16:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from meta@FreeBSD.org) Received: from icepick.vmeta.jp (unknown [IPv6:2405:6586:2280:1200:c05f:f3ff:f812:e85a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: meta/mail) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7C0C0D556; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 16:16:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from meta@FreeBSD.org) Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2019 01:16:50 +0900 From: Koichiro Iwao To: Adam Weinberger Cc: FreeBSD Ports , ruby@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FLAVORS for Ruby Message-ID: <20190916161650.4ofb2o27tfxif57e@icepick.vmeta.jp> References: <20190913074519.xfu3avb4ihmfzm2o@icepick.vmeta.jp> <20190913090645.buutinhgh2pygb4h@icepick.vmeta.jp> <20190914042738.r3hedyqtpxsxnd5e@icepick.vmeta.jp> <006FCB74-04EB-4A82-A800-6C7CA273E749@adamw.org> <20190916143929.z6vnzoqjme6vw2ey@icepick.vmeta.jp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 12.1-PRERELEASE amd64 User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2019 16:16:58 -0000 On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 08:54:17AM -0600, Adam Weinberger wrote: > On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 8:39 AM Koichiro Iwao wrote: > > > > On Sat, Sep 14, 2019 at 10:52:45AM -0600, Adam Weinberger wrote: > > > The issue is that FLAVORS has added a substantial (and painful) complexity to python ports and python.mk. It means that a number of people have had to be hyper-vigilant and watch commits closely to catch errors introduced when people utilize the paradigm incorrectly. It’s a bitter pill, but it’s accepted because the use-case for multiple concurrent python versions is essential. > > > > > > As Antoine said, inconsistency isn’t a strong enough use case. Which brings us back to the original question: is there a specific use-case for concurrent ruby that makes the substantial increase in cognitive load, complexity, and monitoring worth it? > > > > PHP also have FLAVORS. What about PHP? Multiple concurrent PHP versions > > is essential? > > We're going in circles here. I've for the third time now that what > we'd need to get on board is a use case, a description of the end-user > problem that we're trying to solve. > > What you've provided (for the fourth time in this thread) is a straw > man argument. What other languages have is irrelevant. We are much > less concerned with "consistency" than with solving end-user problems > in a way that fits the specific use case. > > Steve seemed interested in the idea. I'd explore it with him, and I > hope you are able to make it happen. I'm done here. Thanks. I see a gap between you and me but I'll give it a try anyway with swills. You: If there's no valid reasons, don't do it. Me: If there's no invalid reasons, try it. I believe that the reason Ruby don't have FLAVORS is just nobody worked on that. In fact, swills worked on that a little. BTW, if I can do something only necessary, what a boring life. -- meta From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Sep 17 06:40:43 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78F81F93C2 for ; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 06:40:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mat@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46XYQg2Vq2z4bYN for ; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 06:40:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mat@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 53639F93BF; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 06:40:43 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 530F7F93BE; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 06:40:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mat@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::24b:4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46XYQg1PQTz4bYM; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 06:40:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mat@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail.j.mat.cc (owncloud.cube.mat.cc [79.143.240.228]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.mat.cc", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) (Authenticated sender: mat/mail) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D81921364F; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 06:40:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mat@FreeBSD.org) Received: from atuin.in.mat.cc (unknown [IPv6:2a01:678:42:ffff:3e15:c2ff:fec4:452e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mat@mat.cc) by mail.j.mat.cc (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 78D1F942D80; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 06:40:40 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2019 08:40:39 +0200 From: Mathieu Arnold To: Koichiro Iwao Cc: Adam Weinberger , FreeBSD Ports , ruby@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FLAVORS for Ruby Message-ID: <20190917064039.7qhnw3lds2zaxdl5@atuin.in.mat.cc> References: <20190913074519.xfu3avb4ihmfzm2o@icepick.vmeta.jp> <20190913090645.buutinhgh2pygb4h@icepick.vmeta.jp> <20190914042738.r3hedyqtpxsxnd5e@icepick.vmeta.jp> <006FCB74-04EB-4A82-A800-6C7CA273E749@adamw.org> <20190916143929.z6vnzoqjme6vw2ey@icepick.vmeta.jp> <20190916161650.4ofb2o27tfxif57e@icepick.vmeta.jp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ezlm5sg6hqdmgwqe" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190916161650.4ofb2o27tfxif57e@icepick.vmeta.jp> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2019 06:40:43 -0000 --ezlm5sg6hqdmgwqe Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 01:16:50AM +0900, Koichiro Iwao wrote: > On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 08:54:17AM -0600, Adam Weinberger wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 8:39 AM Koichiro Iwao wrote: > > > > > > On Sat, Sep 14, 2019 at 10:52:45AM -0600, Adam Weinberger wrote: > > > > The issue is that FLAVORS has added a substantial (and painful) com= plexity to python ports and python.mk. It means that a number of people hav= e had to be hyper-vigilant and watch commits closely to catch errors introd= uced when people utilize the paradigm incorrectly. It=E2=80=99s a bitter pi= ll, but it=E2=80=99s accepted because the use-case for multiple concurrent = python versions is essential. > > > > > > > > As Antoine said, inconsistency isn=E2=80=99t a strong enough use ca= se. Which brings us back to the original question: is there a specific use-= case for concurrent ruby that makes the substantial increase in cognitive l= oad, complexity, and monitoring worth it? > > > > > > PHP also have FLAVORS. What about PHP? Multiple concurrent PHP versio= ns > > > is essential? > >=20 > > We're going in circles here. I've for the third time now that what > > we'd need to get on board is a use case, a description of the end-user > > problem that we're trying to solve. > >=20 > > What you've provided (for the fourth time in this thread) is a straw > > man argument. What other languages have is irrelevant. We are much > > less concerned with "consistency" than with solving end-user problems > > in a way that fits the specific use case. > >=20 > > Steve seemed interested in the idea. I'd explore it with him, and I > > hope you are able to make it happen. I'm done here. >=20 > Thanks. I see a gap between you and me but I'll give it a try anyway > with swills. >=20 > You: If there's no valid reasons, don't do it. > Me: If there's no invalid reasons, try it. >=20 > I believe that the reason Ruby don't have FLAVORS is just nobody worked > on that. In fact, swills worked on that a little. >=20 > BTW, if I can do something only necessary, what a boring life. What we are all trying to say is that adding flavors for ruby will have a big impact on build time and ressources required for building. If all you want is to have ruby flavors for the kicks of it, then I am glad to tell you that no, it will not be done. Now, the question is, why would someone need to have ruby flavors? The answer cannot be "because it should be fun" or "there is no reason there should not be". Give us a real reason about why it would be required. --=20 Mathieu Arnold --ezlm5sg6hqdmgwqe Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQKTBAABCgB9FiEEOraXidLtEhBkQLpbOkUW81GDzkgFAl2Af+ZfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDNB QjY5Nzg5RDJFRDEyMTA2NDQwQkE1QjNBNDUxNkYzNTE4M0NFNDgACgkQOkUW81GD zkjsYA/+KkjAuBH227F8RKYFD/Wa99Jzfy+gEfdw0u9uoCYgY6oMXZmQr+M/eqHF /QfH+g0/pENsPAkJs0jA8AZsk5+aEPeaPGnUpiKRXxvsJVpqSiWqXKxQykZsZizU k8mcyt56ts8lAmg6lWkgeKpO2TUwAp5u/fQogoacRPORVqNlN8eAhkM9nl0zttoz kq8koan1dlZEcA8mR7ow4HlXqW1a0/Fd22YrKBzYcnXxF0Trojm/xH56q3ToAw/K uGMu9KZnxfeNLV+6jjwlZYEsWDqR9ig6o25P6q7oFlKd7Z1uHypMKMuvARkxEi7/ yGlJq4bC0ffVwtwNM5I/KzhdZLfLHl/fodcMLNWNPOeVLFV/EdHMcpXJJ6RrTKUs 8LhAwcbjrk5q5g2jXtGkwOexvMZ+tinskwobvOwAFbzgas+9qjMbBn2edXq2iwUP JaJv7OAzTMVHfj3iDdtelVjxOQaaGZuQbjPJEAK8xqnAMv45i9gG8EWeVzKxNPc9 vx/tVf2jCt9+Oyr2J2PSdVcOKizh706TRyV8WmYrr275ovXrF8vVS5i+hoBreocS 34oC1rNLjV2eUOaY6GNApuEe7HPKo8jm8N03OFq/2iMkXS5xoMQGNsNil72hq+16 NlMBPTPnseY6CAxHtMyfJV8xycjOR9Wb5fShNogDC5MqHnAvu94= =n3+o -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ezlm5sg6hqdmgwqe-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Sep 17 07:29:37 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B9D1FA07C for ; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 07:29:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dewaynegeraghty@gmail.com) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46XZW51H8Zz4dWS for ; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 07:29:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dewaynegeraghty@gmail.com) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 2BD1BFA079; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 07:29:37 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B834FA078; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 07:29:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dewaynegeraghty@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wm1-x330.google.com (mail-wm1-x330.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::330]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46XZW433lZz4dWR; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 07:29:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dewaynegeraghty@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wm1-x330.google.com with SMTP id x2so1963003wmj.2; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 00:29:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=21P5C39VCL4emSN8XuhsbdH/78177ReoFJZ2xdsMiyM=; b=ZFzJ/iMA1vnQjtXojGgoBJ9rJNVCA9/COonN8T+KI71bKC7EKm+jnX7yBVX19u0ug4 FhP1Yomw6Sr0T6nVFbBj+YeKWE5T8wQUb+5FXGgOj2Czei9AmEwl02ecNkSHTSQWg0rj ZZS5BaCxukR7sntDGlqMq2pIddZUyK90ZrPrHoFSPnexhUg9ThnuPOSCl5MGX2v7DZLC 75hBWZuguIZSgK5Sr/rNrQerqoqfqPornOgvwWQ1bqWlAUM+9d6VKeXfJwRX/3i3wZgQ nmFZFw/xzNpU9YjOofxqKJeHCMzA8U3YO4gxhmnVNW21ZdTDVSuqJwgVcnzFNhKD0Y3g OulA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=21P5C39VCL4emSN8XuhsbdH/78177ReoFJZ2xdsMiyM=; b=nspCYIRRaR15RsuG8g89yPd9E/IrMAL1RwYF18LG0NjKIVD9pWGYzhP7ukLPeabH6S ueHeoIqF3YHysubo7TjluXTjNLk5wclJY9egoCPqeFLj70oNxBCvVJE7gBD6xmy6rckx iIRvPwXbMg53Ti1fUiOCJ7jp3SQNoqHTsFOI4NKwE+xlE1NKfI5zSQChPNkVgguM6BkA 8QOsi063ldaS7IZvyZv8zpUG+0s3/VTyQ6UgMxqx8mnnlitRCEsPLupJTUr53aOfdbGN 7MFXpNu1GncOI0ClkUbbYHhWcbS430i8Nfmz+why2ttP46qWOg1mh5dasI1pUHIpawbc KBxg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWPqnWedt5gk+8bR0X2fm0s7a/ReQh6y/eN/7L8GIi3NQKrREw6 sm+Etdzs3UZEv15cEMauveykA5CJozp8HV0wPiWG+SCl X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqynoC1d6IElwvnEhPeoWsM/0Yq89ujaHxFB2+HAw0ZlFHDQhlUBU4YGg1VNeqMcs7o8AhxRaufVBSDbkSlSqgI= X-Received: by 2002:a1c:9c96:: with SMTP id f144mr2339492wme.96.1568705374436; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 00:29:34 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190913074519.xfu3avb4ihmfzm2o@icepick.vmeta.jp> <20190913090645.buutinhgh2pygb4h@icepick.vmeta.jp> <20190914042738.r3hedyqtpxsxnd5e@icepick.vmeta.jp> <006FCB74-04EB-4A82-A800-6C7CA273E749@adamw.org> <20190916143929.z6vnzoqjme6vw2ey@icepick.vmeta.jp> <20190916161650.4ofb2o27tfxif57e@icepick.vmeta.jp> <20190917064039.7qhnw3lds2zaxdl5@atuin.in.mat.cc> In-Reply-To: <20190917064039.7qhnw3lds2zaxdl5@atuin.in.mat.cc> From: Dewayne Geraghty Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2019 17:29:06 +1000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: FLAVORS for Ruby To: Koichiro Iwao Cc: FreeBSD Ports , ruby@freebsd.org X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46XZW433lZz4dWR X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=ZFzJ/iMA; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of dewaynegeraghty@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4864:20::330 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=dewaynegeraghty@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.00 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a00:1450:4000::/36]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE_FREEMAIL(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(0.00)[ip: (-9.30), ipnet: 2a00:1450::/32(-2.95), asn: 15169(-2.24), country: US(-0.05)]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[0.3.3.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.0.0.4.6.8.4.0.5.4.1.0.0.a.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2a00:1450::/32, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2019 07:29:37 -0000 Bottom line: flavors came into being to satisfy specific needs. Python 2 underwent substantial changes during the upgrade to python 3, to the extent that many (most) python applications would cease to function. Similarly php5 to php7. Without flavours the user-base would've been severly impacted during the upgrade transition where some fraction of their applications would fail. Flavours, though I didn't appreciate it at the time, was/is a really smart move and has saved most of us contorting our systems with different versions of the "same" software I suppose if the ruby developers make such a substantial change to the language that applications break, then adding flavors to ruby might be worthwhile. As stated, there is substantial effort required and the need significant. And as I still have "ports" that use python2 (though most use python3), I greatly appeciate their effort. Is there a specific issue, ie breakage requiring ruby flavors? From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Sep 17 11:16:58 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19EC1FF988 for ; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 11:16:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46XgYP6s74z3Npk for ; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 11:16:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id EB155FF986; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 11:16:57 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAA13FF985; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 11:16:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::24b:4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46XgYP5yZSz3Npj; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 11:16:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: from ivaldir.etoilebsd.net (etoilebsd.net [178.32.217.76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: bapt) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 88D53155C7; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 11:16:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: by ivaldir.etoilebsd.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 2486BB76D6; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 13:16:56 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2019 13:16:56 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: Dewayne Geraghty Cc: Koichiro Iwao , FreeBSD Ports , ruby@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FLAVORS for Ruby Message-ID: <20190917111655.3x5chgmu4gsemlba@ivaldir.net> References: <20190913090645.buutinhgh2pygb4h@icepick.vmeta.jp> <20190914042738.r3hedyqtpxsxnd5e@icepick.vmeta.jp> <006FCB74-04EB-4A82-A800-6C7CA273E749@adamw.org> <20190916143929.z6vnzoqjme6vw2ey@icepick.vmeta.jp> <20190916161650.4ofb2o27tfxif57e@icepick.vmeta.jp> <20190917064039.7qhnw3lds2zaxdl5@atuin.in.mat.cc> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ngaaipn67ky2z2pc" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2019 11:16:58 -0000 --ngaaipn67ky2z2pc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 05:29:06PM +1000, Dewayne Geraghty wrote: > Bottom line: flavors came into being to satisfy specific needs. Python 2 > underwent substantial changes during the upgrade to python 3, to the exte= nt > that many (most) python applications would cease to function. Similarly > php5 to php7. Without flavours the user-base would've been severly > impacted during the upgrade transition where some fraction of their > applications would fail. Flavours, though I didn't appreciate it at the > time, was/is a really smart move and has saved most of us contorting our > systems with different versions of the "same" software >=20 > I suppose if the ruby developers make such a substantial change to the > language that applications break, then adding flavors to ruby might be > worthwhile. As stated, there is substantial effort required and the need > significant. And as I still have "ports" that use python2 (though most u= se > python3), I greatly appeciate their effort. >=20 > Is there a specific issue, ie breakage requiring ruby flavors? Thank you Dewayne, that is exactly it! Flavors tends to complexify the ports framework, so they have to be used wi= th caution. the more flavours that are being added the more impacted it has on= the package building performances, but also on the complexity of the ports tree itself. It also complexify the life of maintainers who have then to test ev= ery possible flavors. We at portmgr have decided to make a rule to try to find the right balance. If you look at flarvors for python you can see that the only supporte flavo= r are: one flavor for python3 and one flavor for python2 for the reason exposed by Dewayne exactly. Same goes for php. The last point is about end users, lots of end user are confused when you h= ave too many choices, each time a decision is made on the ports tree, the main target should be to think what will happen for end users. how can they chose what is the right version for them etc. What about big "ruby" project like puppet, should we have 3 version of it because ruby is flavored? how will end user pick up which is the right one = here. Again we do try to find the right balance. So yes if someone has strong arguments in favor of ruby flavors that will improve the user experience, then we will gladely add it. Also note that if you look at python's flavors, while is simplified a lot t= he life of end users we have ended up in a quite poor maintenance situation, l= ots of ports are packages for all the flavours while not working with all of th= em, many end user programs are being packages in both flavours for the sake of = it, but it confuses users for now reasons. That is something we should be caref= ul about. As for the build time arguments, yes it is true as well and if someone want= s kill that arguments, there are room of improvements in both poudriere and pkg for which we will be pleased to get working on ;) Best regards, Bapt --ngaaipn67ky2z2pc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEgOTj3suS2urGXVU3Y4mL3PG3PloFAl2AwKUACgkQY4mL3PG3 Plp7Qw//YtFKJ5UjdspkX96auXIX/wt6pBiKSPgsAFvm4DW5v4+IXEbvBCUve6H4 u4o1WUGVVvwqwFomGea1LLafMq+19LdL3/deBv9F0OPBhMxaopr7XuYfC/nrR69R 3FOu5gAFFyVCspEV260DT3uDGLLChVOQUgB4ggCLOwcJhWooTlpm3zZmDK4gYJqw jhEIK7NcyPPs6zZ2uWI4jIlqUlNJX+Zc+Cgdj6ED3xdaTi7H8vo3sKSXG87isR9K Spf1jQo6li1g5ZFFRNGyER8pXwmv9pxREVg2hWtE93wjqjWnq0ZzpWuUYLTwZU5i B+n+xBlx1OtQbQhaLbGIpeoVjZO94MruyrBK5IccISDz/oTpF2fu9wRCID9F4hlz Ubcz7Z1r/K/ZEqwYiK3+akEuFaujJH4GBbNY8+/MtUXpNTbV2pJ3Th61bjm1ByNI oN0Jv9f2BblvdvqQuWLWNoOZnL1ayJIxfUPh643Z9SJwsXlSqLUI20UmlFa1MaK7 EPi/lfFWhxAZytrLnyJfuOk8yaVGbFo950Fkki6UEtW9gD2oKtL/yRvK6j0zvLmt LMCbYw0btiRFe26y83LttVamxy+as6nL/QWyEtOg4El8oVOzQlkzyvG9qt2u66vO SxZ72KnatyLWWj5Jigq5aqbCnSZDrD7Mnf6mXt3+VWk1P2YdXpg= =JgWL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ngaaipn67ky2z2pc-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Sep 17 12:32:31 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B2FF122CD4 for ; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 12:32:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from soth.netfence.it (net-2-44-121-52.cust.vodafonedsl.it [2.44.121.52]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mailserver.netfence.it", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46XjDZ2BZjz3xqC; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 12:32:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from guardian.ventu (host90-170-static.88-94-b.business.telecomitalia.it [94.88.170.90]) (authenticated bits=0) by soth.netfence.it (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id x8HCW8SL041152 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 17 Sep 2019 14:32:09 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) X-Authentication-Warning: soth.netfence.it: Host host90-170-static.88-94-b.business.telecomitalia.it [94.88.170.90] claimed to be guardian.ventu Subject: Re: Status of samba ports From: Andrea Venturoli To: timur@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: Message-ID: Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2019 14:32:08 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.83 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46XjDZ2BZjz3xqC X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of ml@netfence.it has no SPF policy when checking 2.44.121.52) smtp.mailfrom=ml@netfence.it X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.80 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.99)[-0.993,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-0.998,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; HAS_XAW(0.00)[]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[netfence.it]; IP_SCORE(-1.71)[ip: (-5.53), ipnet: 2.44.0.0/16(-2.77), asn: 30722(-0.27), country: IT(0.03)]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:30722, ipnet:2.44.0.0/16, country:IT]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2019 12:32:31 -0000 On 2019-09-12 13:13, Andrea Venturoli wrote: > Hello. > > I'd like some information WRT to the status of samba ports, what is > [not] working, what *should* be working and what is planned. > ... > Is it supposed to be production ready? > What does and what does not work? > Is there some page (wiki or whatever) that outlines the status of Samba > on FreeBSD? > Is there anything we can do to help? Hello. While we are still in the dark here, 4.11 was released today, obsoleting 4.8, which I think is the default version on FreeBSD. Sorry for being pedantic, but I believe a lot of us would benefit from some guidance: _ should we upgrade promptly to 4.10? Will it work or will it be a waste of time? _ should we stay on 4.8, because it will be the default on FreeBSD for a long time still? And will it be fixed? _ should we just wait for a (working) 4.11 to come our way? When will this happen? bye & Thanks av. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Sep 17 12:55:03 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59B04123676 for ; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 12:55:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp.rcn.com (smtp.rcn.com [69.168.97.78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46XjkZ1cr6z403T for ; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 12:55:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; d=rcn.com; s=20180516; c=relaxed/simple; q=dns/txt; i=@rcn.com; t=1568724901; h=From:Subject:Date:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; bh=ICd+l2j6cFH5FGnQU59ubN7xG6A=; b=qEsoNsFyD1byRMjKzVZUh8wX658o+gz+k9rdL0IiWp/1D4tcIUEF4bwR5d2csnYh AATgTOGT+aaq6L7H6YD8VSYF/G7cM64yuMgUajFfFD6zRGA7IeWuMzdkO/AQGMxy NSmKoN20QspdIM6Qv+ywfDfVATYRHCpz9mHZ6G6nKEuP0e2n/67dfLLIscRzQRHK NrKS75GXzClbepaE1q1wqS8PvQWuCM2gx59/odrFN/tYx9Lz2fJgl9oTP1aRNJ+f UOqT9beSKzMJWpPKgb5p/NjWS7/2I6zzBfM0eYotNJ3WpKnU5YHypjZua3/+xx6S TP1wNPXmZSa4bxEgSJyBMw==; X_CMAE_Category: , , X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.3 cv=Y7KGTSWN c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=9TgA2UwI6Wy+6BV4wQM/cQ==:117 a=9TgA2UwI6Wy+6BV4wQM/cQ==:17 a=jpOVt7BSZ2e4Z31A5e1TngXxSK0=:19 a=KGjhK52YXX0A:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=XRQyMpdBKAEA:10 a=J70Eh1EUuV4A:10 a=48faUk6PgeAA:10 a=CorwIzVERMO3qmnuMzsA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 X-CM-Score: 0 X-Scanned-by: Cloudmark Authority Engine X-Authed-Username: cm9iZXJ0aHVmZkByY24uY29t Received: from [209.6.230.48] ([209.6.230.48:35035] helo=jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) by smtp.rcn.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 3.6.25.56547 r(Core:3.6.25.0)) with ESMTPSA (cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384) id 79/5A-46623-4A7D08D5; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 08:55:01 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <23936.55204.433280.507744@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2019 08:55:00 -0400 From: Robert Huff To: Andrea Venturoli Cc: timur@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Status of samba ports In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: VM 8.2.0b under 26.3 (amd64-portbld-freebsd13.0) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46XjkZ1cr6z403T X-Spamd-Bar: ----- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=rcn.com header.s=20180516 header.b=qEsoNsFy; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=rcn.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of roberthuff@rcn.com designates 69.168.97.78 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=roberthuff@rcn.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-5.88 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[rcn.com:s=20180516]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:69.168.97.0/24]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; IP_SCORE(-1.78)[ip: (-9.45), ipnet: 69.168.97.0/24(0.10), asn: 36271(0.48), country: US(-0.05)]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_LOW(-1.00)[rcn.com.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.1]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[rcn.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[rcn.com,none]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[78.97.168.69.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.1]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:36271, ipnet:69.168.97.0/24, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2019 12:55:03 -0000 Andrea Venturoli writes: > Sorry for being pedantic, but I believe a lot of us would benefit from > some guidance: > _ should we upgrade promptly to 4.10? Will it work or will it be a waste > of time? > _ should we stay on 4.8, because it will be the default on FreeBSD for a > long time still? And will it be fixed? > _ should we just wait for a (working) 4.11 to come our way? When will > this happen? I'd prefer to wait for 4.11, assuming it appears in a reasonable time-frame. What would encourage that would be a "migrating for dummies" document from 4.8, as I understand this is not a trivial process. Respectfully, Robert Huff From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Sep 17 13:49:43 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8363124686 for ; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 13:49:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from markand@malikania.fr) Received: from smtp.smtpout.orange.fr (smtp05.smtpout.orange.fr [80.12.242.127]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "Bizanga Labs SMTP Client Certificate", Issuer "Bizanga Labs CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46Xkxf52D1z42JX for ; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 13:49:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from markand@malikania.fr) Received: from postfix.malikania.fr ([5.135.187.121]) by mwinf5d81 with ME id 2dpe2100U2dbEiD03dpeyS; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 15:49:39 +0200 X-ME-Helo: postfix.malikania.fr X-ME-Auth: ZGVtZWxpZXIuZGF2aWRAb3JhbmdlLmZy X-ME-Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2019 15:49:39 +0200 X-ME-IP: 5.135.187.121 Received: from [167.3.108.158] (unknown [77.159.242.250]) by postfix.malikania.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8E8901BC7A for ; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 15:49:38 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: FLAVORS for Ruby To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <20190913074519.xfu3avb4ihmfzm2o@icepick.vmeta.jp> <20190913090645.buutinhgh2pygb4h@icepick.vmeta.jp> <20190914042738.r3hedyqtpxsxnd5e@icepick.vmeta.jp> <006FCB74-04EB-4A82-A800-6C7CA273E749@adamw.org> <20190916143929.z6vnzoqjme6vw2ey@icepick.vmeta.jp> <20190916161650.4ofb2o27tfxif57e@icepick.vmeta.jp> <20190917064039.7qhnw3lds2zaxdl5@atuin.in.mat.cc> From: David Demelier Message-ID: <89332127-7eda-e581-42f0-03cf4cfc0c1a@malikania.fr> Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2019 15:49:37 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190917064039.7qhnw3lds2zaxdl5@atuin.in.mat.cc> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: fr Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46Xkxf52D1z42JX X-Spamd-Bar: +++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of markand@malikania.fr has no SPF policy when checking 80.12.242.127) smtp.mailfrom=markand@malikania.fr X-Spamd-Result: default: False [3.15 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.64)[0.644,0]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.83)[0.832,0]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[127.242.12.80.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[malikania.fr]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:3215, ipnet:80.12.240.0/20, country:FR]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(0.77)[ip: (1.39), ipnet: 80.12.240.0/20(1.29), asn: 3215(1.17), country: FR(-0.00)]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[127.242.12.80.rep.mailspike.net : 127.0.0.17] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2019 13:49:43 -0000 Le 17/09/2019 à 08:40, Mathieu Arnold a écrit : > What we are all trying to say is that adding flavors for ruby will have > a big impact on build time and ressources required for building. > > If all you want is to have ruby flavors for the kicks of it, then I am > glad to tell you that no, it will not be done. > > Now, the question is, why would someone need to have ruby flavors? I second this. Ruby follows semantic versioning since 2.1.0 so there is no need to have flavors until they do a major release that breaks the compatibility. -- David From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Sep 17 14:14:09 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA9CB1253FD for ; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 14:14:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carmel_ny@outlook.com) Received: from NAM04-SN1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-oln040092011082.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.92.11.82]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.protection.outlook.com", Issuer "GlobalSign Organization Validation CA - SHA256 - G3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46XlTr4QWxz44C7 for ; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 14:14:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carmel_ny@outlook.com) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=EzDSkg01VoyGDA6i1gBeR27DkePLSSbtn8/9uTF987ZBvmGEqMOwh9bxsjHITnhPj/vQkcUKsvg9wt1csVGuzi7AfKxbIDcCCxGQ2MEXsxuo4nVCwq2UKwT51f2aG9Oh3XWC/k1OhwKlds6j9rkSqpLYcWViiJs1sTWxvdNrzTOPHP6LLChtNNUSz2AYQsN4kUOFZVtTN47qyYtU92LixyZL2ctmoNGOA+zphURJLF7YL6r+PPHY0H5KcNusXi4XJcEVea4dovNVkjJSzt73PVnIJ1i0pa7LWV5SU6oBE6XZK08vL9q8BlJn5oS0hke+gAkI7yFeZkuoA9TBhRqCXg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=QDXNQ3Yb8TzmSdu+D2tuw+7tzVVfVK7Yf/2kW2VnF6g=; b=GIV55liU8u5reGonAR/v8MxhwY7yg2C1QO9LaGhEzUD1Y/1hvJui1vxh4B72YRIG5IdWOZ40wGrmqaUpOjF8Td+YZDRv1oM6gOg3kFW9Spe7c6G6qmGtZmJwuGGAiBtYndM62N4LILx3FflUpOIfxCxQkjMKOjxgViB0D48aAELk98S8DkfR/6v/wXnWIPEHCnVxSEfCpZRjCggR1pO2EQjDi0SIqZ+MG9oxHBOxLUCPZlKm/YQoxqcvvGBQLNf+DAIhjGo2xfOhQui5kPnvQwsPFuyFgal0s39bphDX0jUUEINf5BNFbOCNvQQLgZmMK1Tnq7vHEcRHsWjntpn8Qw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=none; dmarc=none; dkim=none; arc=none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=outlook.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=QDXNQ3Yb8TzmSdu+D2tuw+7tzVVfVK7Yf/2kW2VnF6g=; b=MOO3BWnlnhNbzzgpPI1qMmVfueyX87F3gCrpXzZlHh0sbteqB3HuifJPdqJb+olkUL+s/RgOCiwoSlfGk9mTMRMHACx4xOICyQZdxKCbHLBrlyrL7pucNqyzgQPp2Epcs/3Z+JomERvatTDwnW0ycSfKBCQhDJyJnsuXpo54GHa01u6bjeEk52JAvoc0qwq19nTTGoVaachuVKXKCl8KNDYcTv6Dg4IYMKmYJ+J4GsTnsJ1FNQe/nzZJMFQQfbLuAuTgX0Qoc4zNqy4PUY+lMhaLxLhJ8Gt/kuTFtNIq6rBJ96zawYgw9nq8WGBmi335yOI5QrWkKZojNxkC9HJLsQ== Received: from BN3NAM04FT048.eop-NAM04.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.92.56) by BN3NAM04HT058.eop-NAM04.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.92.248) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2263.14; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 14:14:06 +0000 Received: from MWHPR04MB0495.namprd04.prod.outlook.com (10.152.92.57) by BN3NAM04FT048.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.92.210) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2263.14 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 14:14:06 +0000 Received: from MWHPR04MB0495.namprd04.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::b483:dfcd:71fc:4825]) by MWHPR04MB0495.namprd04.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::b483:dfcd:71fc:4825%11]) with mapi id 15.20.2263.023; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 14:14:06 +0000 From: Carmel NY To: FreeBSD Ports Subject: Re: Status of samba ports Thread-Topic: Status of samba ports Thread-Index: AQHVaVsepwMFqAh9VES9dHNMeOz/aA== Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2019 14:14:06 +0000 Message-ID: References: <23936.55204.433280.507744@jerusalem.litteratus.org> In-Reply-To: <23936.55204.433280.507744@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Reply-To: FreeBSD Ports Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-clientproxiedby: BN6PR1401CA0009.namprd14.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:405:4b::19) To MWHPR04MB0495.namprd04.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:300:73::16) x-mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.4 (GTK+ 2.24.32; i686-w64-mingw32) x-incomingtopheadermarker: OriginalChecksum:F627A6C71835FF17CD2ACE53249D7DE22B7983CEA26F01077AAD3718A3E5BFB1; UpperCasedChecksum:8832B9E6C3769D20009D39D0D6C3432D02B2952EC61E03EDF1E8DC171A10EDA9; SizeAsReceived:7582; Count:51 x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1 x-tmn: [a5Xem+x6zus5gt+jE57naAsD6GMKd/O0a/StypRlKtk=] x-microsoft-original-message-id: <20190917101401.000046d9@outlook.com> x-ms-publictraffictype: Email x-incomingheadercount: 51 x-eopattributedmessage: 0 x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(2390118)(5050001)(7020095)(20181119110)(201702061078)(5061506573)(5061507331)(1603103135)(2017031320274)(2017031322404)(2017031323274)(2017031324274)(1601125500)(1603101475)(1701031045); SRVR:BN3NAM04HT058; x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BN3NAM04HT058: x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: kjFXhZ8fBZnPXEhX9mk7+Rj8vwO3WSajdwEfON4HvIgjVmCrVWJQ3VfQU8Y7m06huQrH9COe4Heqziz9ys8LZB6OjMzFLGo1YOtA/Rk+mPicmKFYJHQfVfQSOonMObdbh7QvtEZndKfust3LUNlpu2ubfClpZnOyPquj0e4x3LYUNqyP9oDg9e2EVrnN2Dna x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-RMS-PersistedConsumerOrg: 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 1a24e16f-96cd-4e3c-2dc9-08d73b794c7d X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-rms-persistedconsumerorg: 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 17 Sep 2019 14:14:06.3145 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Internet X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BN3NAM04HT058 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46XlTr4QWxz44C7 X-Spamd-Bar: + Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=outlook.com header.s=selector1 header.b=MOO3BWnl; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=outlook.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of carmel_ny@outlook.com designates 40.92.11.82 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=carmel_ny@outlook.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [1.10 / 15.00]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:40.92.0.0/15]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[outlook.com]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[outlook.com:+]; MIME_BASE64_TEXT(0.10)[]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[outlook.com,none]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[outlook.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:8075, ipnet:40.64.0.0/10, country:US]; ARC_ALLOW(-1.00)[i=1]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[outlook.com.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.3.0]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[outlook.com:s=selector1]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; IP_SCORE(0.00)[ipnet: 40.64.0.0/10(-3.65), asn: 8075(-2.51), country: US(-0.05)]; REPLYTO_EQ_TO_ADDR(5.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; IP_SCORE_FREEMAIL(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[82.11.92.40.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.3.0] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2019 14:14:09 -0000 T24gVHVlLCAxNyBTZXAgMjAxOSAwODo1NTowMCAtMDQwMCwgUm9iZXJ0IEh1ZmYgc3RhdGVkOg0K PkFuZHJlYSBWZW50dXJvbGkgd3JpdGVzOg0KPg0KPj4gIFNvcnJ5IGZvciBiZWluZyBwZWRhbnRp YywgYnV0IEkgYmVsaWV2ZSBhIGxvdCBvZiB1cyB3b3VsZCBiZW5lZml0DQo+PiBmcm9tIHNvbWUg Z3VpZGFuY2U6DQo+PiAgXyBzaG91bGQgd2UgdXBncmFkZSBwcm9tcHRseSB0byA0LjEwPyBXaWxs IGl0IHdvcmsgb3Igd2lsbCBpdCBiZSBhDQo+PiB3YXN0ZSBvZiB0aW1lPw0KPj4gIF8gc2hvdWxk IHdlIHN0YXkgb24gNC44LCBiZWNhdXNlIGl0IHdpbGwgYmUgdGhlIGRlZmF1bHQgb24gRnJlZUJT RA0KPj4gZm9yIGEgbG9uZyB0aW1lIHN0aWxsPyBBbmQgd2lsbCBpdCBiZSBmaXhlZD8NCj4+ICBf IHNob3VsZCB3ZSBqdXN0IHdhaXQgZm9yIGEgKHdvcmtpbmcpIDQuMTEgdG8gY29tZSBvdXIgd2F5 PyBXaGVuDQo+PiB3aWxsIHRoaXMgaGFwcGVuPyAgDQo+DQo+CUknZCBwcmVmZXIgdG8gd2FpdCBm b3IgNC4xMSwgYXNzdW1pbmcgaXQgYXBwZWFycyBpbiBhDQo+CXJlYXNvbmFibGUNCj50aW1lLWZy YW1lLg0KPglXaGF0IHdvdWxkIGVuY291cmFnZSB0aGF0IHdvdWxkIGJlIGEgIm1pZ3JhdGluZyBm b3IgZHVtbWllcyINCj5kb2N1bWVudCBmcm9tIDQuOCwgYXMgSSB1bmRlcnN0YW5kIHRoaXMgaXMg bm90IGEgdHJpdmlhbCBwcm9jZXNzLg0KDQpTYW1iYSBhbm5vdW5jZWQgdGhlIGF2YWlsYWJpbGl0 eSBvZiBTYW1iYSA0LjExLjAgZm9yIGRvd25sb2FkLiBZb3UNCm1pZ2h0IHdhbnQgdG8gY29udGFj dCB0aGUgc2FtYmEgcG9ydCBtYWludGFpbmVyLCB0aW11ckBGcmVlQlNELm9yZywNCnJlZ2FyZGlu ZyB3aGVuIGhlIHBsYW5zIHRvIHJlbGVhc2UgaXQgdG8gdGhlIHBvcnQgc3lzdGVtLg0KDQotLSAN CkNhcm1lbA0K From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Sep 18 06:41:39 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4042FF3714 for ; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 06:41:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46Y9PH0hjnz3Q6B for ; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 06:41:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 130B8F370C; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 06:41:39 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12D16F370B for ; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 06:41:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46Y9PG6rpsz3Q62 for ; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 06:41:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (portscout.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C000D2110B for ; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 06:41:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x8I6fclK086679; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 06:41:38 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201909180641.x8I6fclK086679@portscout.nyi.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.nyi.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2019 06:41:38 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2019 06:41:39 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ sysutils/google-compute-engine-oslogin | 1.5.3 | v20190916 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ sysutils/py-google-compute-engine | 2.8.16 | v20190916 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Thanks. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Sep 19 00:25:41 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C5DFEB01D for ; Thu, 19 Sep 2019 00:25:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marklmi@yahoo.com) Received: from sonic307-10.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com (sonic307-10.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com [66.163.190.33]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46Yd0z3PBSz3xYk for ; Thu, 19 Sep 2019 00:25:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marklmi@yahoo.com) X-YMail-OSG: XGwCbawVM1mq4R2TD6.tsNdwyK0qrpfD4yamidud8_RdQbGttIhdbhgQHf_SxyI HrQVGvuV7M1X3XkbSCDqaUoAEcy7jn.nIGYlBaeSjRRA8ZtYPSPgjxe8.AwGv1tikF_QCnGe89Oi q0E1o.9yFd.fj7OC86NMYKNrDNgu7s2HzwuHV2TyIjs4obFg2cR_Q2otggn7zCFEDtPiZK.j9bvw MGNspCl8pgYhVle5L0knbjFqdlS.C0K8.roI.x39.hWbzWyWL.o.EqMOuzuD_kk8ZJJthD4wak4z BkemdK5EpndFWa.9h83hHkewp3vdaZPNiNf187XNOJxJEvyZcwjCd38EgL50K6LBvZxxsMcXzaMt 3uSmuIPZL0d0AsIXtJlJ.5Vh0LtfchzMdA7KGo_3LcNMQAOf8SPsMwWF9vtoh4giykdyNAC6M2mP Cio5N3HK1YFmAxJ9Ei9AmfQM80FXoiUXBNSHD0FibD.Y8AM5dQrsEkFgfgmVgkaOAvLZ5zi9nlo5 t1ZyfTiQZNUUMrt_FA.uiZUghNe.m_8hNLa_DAhQYK8vRtY2ykN4FP37qvjiVA6fcAC6N_jhaaoC GzQSI40qVgYUFMLm8o.I_hUS3whwpPekm5V5t1lyaiE4rN8j2OrZGBnsfC3a6fA7bQ4MpBRsKIwL VXZdCSmrhpIOdwxlCwTTKfN92nufuEyrHzbD2.IJANnCTAOwjeBVik0yTRxerxmClDyGH.c5fUJh qG0oRxRhx3WnXjamswWVEH4FmWHEoOuBECTMYrHiNa.p0j.8soS303pGI2CDYYFiuj.RsawEnRWX BXpdizrnuBGbpF12qG6OX3gyPVR_44ZKlGsElj14v2YW5TLZAIG06zQ3dq8RSxvrjxKuCWQhulcU rf4LOXV9oOrDWBfdShuMlsPCVy8ov26oEc1xhJYRgZz2iqpwZx6xX2VDxEKm972kyZ2R91ndBiaW leHR90Q9_98tgHLPP5RnFjtCJ2nOLNVXSLijZcSkKietNlWm_obWmSLjMdJ1aoK9dKZ3FmpHBG1S K39Zg7mXuah3CSXGeeicvbed_pI.1lgZ2f53QfCKLZYAflOwGM4XABXXl6HnYuaNOdifQKdudxrn K9IwoC4tUkTMkOm3qlAwXuaKirss4VsLOuqI3TBsJ1CDW1m8kTL9vVn_BWnivm7kTrjNSHjdwNUW 8AY6oPCIDGgMGltKhMxBl5ZR8M82WC9Pl1qOE28VjLNGrfdMD2KeiHPVGiW8FOjtE7TCyB0YDvMW hzAnERiG.xcUx_rU.2MbwIlMIJRNg0iJkmA2hK5I6jhgAa44hrYHCs8.f Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic307.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with HTTP; Thu, 19 Sep 2019 00:25:37 +0000 Received: by smtp423.mail.ne1.yahoo.com (Oath Hermes SMTP Server) with ESMTPA ID ada68acea9805b00f5335b723b908cc9; Thu, 19 Sep 2019 00:25:35 +0000 (UTC) From: Mark Millard Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\)) Subject: powerpc64 head -r352341 ports head -r512281 poudriere-devel based boost-libs-1.71.0 build failure: =>> Killing runaway build after 7200 seconds with no output Message-Id: Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2019 17:25:32 -0700 To: freebsd-ppc@freebsd.org, ports-list freebsd X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46Yd0z3PBSz3xYk X-Spamd-Bar: -- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.44 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.94)[-0.944,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[yahoo.com:s=s2048]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ptr:yahoo.com]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[yahoo.com]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.99)[-0.993,0]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; IP_SCORE_FREEMAIL(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[yahoo.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[33.190.163.66.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[yahoo.com,reject]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[yahoo.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:36646, ipnet:66.163.184.0/21, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(0.00)[ip: (3.68), ipnet: 66.163.184.0/21(1.31), asn: 36646(1.05), country: US(-0.05)]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[yahoo.com.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2019 00:25:41 -0000 [This is from a system-clang 8 based FreeBSD context for powerpc64, not the usual gcc 4.2.1 based context.] In attempting to update the ports I normally build, jumping ahead from -r509171, I got the following: . . . ...updated 1359 targets... = =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D = =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D> Staging for boost-libs-1.71.0 . . . - pthread-supports-robust-mutexes : yes (cached) - gcc visibility : yes (cached) - long double support : yes (cached) warning: skipping optional Message Passing Interface (MPI) library. note: to enable MPI support, add "using mpi ;" to user-config.jam. note: to suppress this message, pass "--without-mpi" to bjam. note: otherwise, you can safely ignore this message. - libbacktrace builds : no (cached) - addr2line builds : yes (cached) - WinDbg builds : no (cached) - WinDbgCached builds : no (cached) - BOOST_COMP_GNUC >=3D 4.3.0 : no (cached) =3D>> Killing runaway build after 7200 seconds with no output - zlib : yes (cached) - bzip2 : yes (cached) - lzma : yes (cached) - zstd : no (cached) =3D>> Cleaning up wrkdir =3D=3D=3D> Cleaning for boost-libs-1.71.0 Killed build of devel/boost-libs | boost-libs-1.71.0 ended at Wed Sep 18 = 16:38:56 PDT 2019 build time: 04:39:04 !!! build failure encountered !!! When I made another large jump a couple of days ago to -r509171 (to match other contexts that I had), the boost-libs build did not fail. (The overall bulk run is still ongoing.) =3D=3D=3D Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away in early 2018-Mar) From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Sep 19 07:26:24 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D162F9076 for ; Thu, 19 Sep 2019 07:26:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marklmi@yahoo.com) Received: from sonic305-1.consmr.mail.bf2.yahoo.com (sonic305-1.consmr.mail.bf2.yahoo.com [74.6.133.40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46YpLQ5K5Jz4MGy for ; Thu, 19 Sep 2019 07:26:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marklmi@yahoo.com) X-YMail-OSG: uuCyX.0VM1mfd5Oe42glrtWQzThUW14IJZHsV73BlLq3sSg5HT1KjFecJlFlSrz 3C8Mld26Ir2CNXRGgYwEnYSiqpBnhAdscBzXenOIFInjixDReaS_TMqFwhVFEDCqOnHjzzAYWIOQ vNr5oGngOWvuVPybvwkY8351gfF1sR7bdkPNQTdFaILrCMkQUtdi91EcFPZLkGnCpI8IAyT1pQYm Vz9EudsyzYd4kUh13tTKvl3FQn8S6A60b2BR4arwojXAPTdjpTrLJ1dzEB1vuWn0W98OPyVtPqFC PZVvYZJDtXM.zEiPjysDkYFXoiUJ3L2YhLa6sVp5aw2ECRefGJl95BBmIOcduxzh4D6Xfy.xXrTZ 9TR8QP5jd.IONXxg6VqDTT_o98KTbGT5TZ4oPmB_vsshjYjV6aTlpsMLQj.JmiBapY.eMqucgr1_ Qa7DK61tR_0ZjNAHbckb8Hz0Wc9MCbApnp_oaW8DsczILzJuasNCc5PyeLM9nNFZz8liL0ReLEr5 Dl1n7OsIrbkw9zbjhyy.ONy4Vs88fQT.upwTOB_IXgXKQo3HbYJAfASsg8eeYrBfT9E30Uh2ipKK tXlwrC13c3MN2VHh0d1AgLz2rjbTcM4h3gnB4HGYInDXWqPmBxpfEwEEfkfOlxawubTdNZOQ_HNM Zniu2u21YaYL8f8ChDbMUGLLV2WP_cVuEo_9ONuWYnI0LLfBebInKCysJHkXK6ioXwueeImYzEe4 N4Ec.MVDPkEyKNwHiBAabIh0CEP69vRjPgP848gbddE93QK2xr3IaB4L4um2uWwX_SRMOvaIhch7 0GC2cxjAMJe8iIJTt9cy4L33pnNZlb2TUjxolm_u17gRHSGk2cVQgbit9XUjEL34_qxLJVifIGfX hN..m1w3m9JzIwUyRbzo3lktSyi7RuyY5QAZQYFUPMICJIWAQr29U8W7bWr5VHXrEZXNMpmZHe5N 5lyMijq8GgXB22mLiSZ6YZEwQ9Fy..iJDefoj5XgTMPwz5hI39Vu2.wYCqOILV8vIxc.1IVRWGvr 0_FdDOFXrseE.JpciIPhtr7b9lX6YhZhWo9yDjq.REUJIdrXbCfKBPDmcZJnltCs78eJ.3oTr8bs 1ypjZ2vnkaBgrDBpXXZxrrT9CcbhwOV_V4hl1DUJk59sduOUqOzCqvuWno_ox6a_sd4sMwkwVrgF b2ee6PgDXpT2mY1aAGsPamzXMd2YM1GwpQf5TOV0k1eMUkrAgtl4Fiq0OHvaKPtoOmCn55snmXv5 dJ.rqKxou7Tp3f5xhk2PPVzlLuMLnSeEskgBj0iTmobSKVmS2MNXy1zdV Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic305.consmr.mail.bf2.yahoo.com with HTTP; Thu, 19 Sep 2019 07:26:20 +0000 Received: by smtp428.mail.bf1.yahoo.com (Oath Hermes SMTP Server) with ESMTPA ID 41dc49c30a9876c81e7f757afb70aac8; Thu, 19 Sep 2019 07:26:18 +0000 (UTC) From: Mark Millard Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\)) Subject: Re: powerpc64 head -r352341 ports head -r512281 poudriere-devel based boost-libs-1.71.0 build failure: =>> Killing runaway build after 7200 seconds with no output Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2019 00:26:15 -0700 References: To: freebsd-ppc@freebsd.org, ports-list freebsd In-Reply-To: Message-Id: <1A241202-4A3D-495E-B70D-AE8488846B36@yahoo.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46YpLQ5K5Jz4MGy X-Spamd-Bar: -- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.46 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.97)[-0.967,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[yahoo.com:s=s2048]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ptr:yahoo.com]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[yahoo.com]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-0.996,0]; IP_SCORE_FREEMAIL(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[yahoo.com.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[yahoo.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[40.133.6.74.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[yahoo.com,reject]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[yahoo.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:26101, ipnet:74.6.128.0/21, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(0.00)[ip: (3.95), ipnet: 74.6.128.0/21(1.45), asn: 26101(1.16), country: US(-0.05)]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2019 07:26:24 -0000 On 2019-Sep-18, at 17:25, Mark Millard wrote: > [This is from a system-clang 8 based FreeBSD context for > powerpc64, not the usual gcc 4.2.1 based context.] >=20 > In attempting to update the ports I normally build, jumping > ahead from -r509171, I got the following: >=20 > . . . > ...updated 1359 targets... > = =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > = =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > =3D=3D=3D> Staging for boost-libs-1.71.0 > . . . > - pthread-supports-robust-mutexes : yes (cached) > - gcc visibility : yes (cached) > - long double support : yes (cached) > warning: skipping optional Message Passing Interface (MPI) library. > note: to enable MPI support, add "using mpi ;" to user-config.jam. > note: to suppress this message, pass "--without-mpi" to bjam. > note: otherwise, you can safely ignore this message. > - libbacktrace builds : no (cached) > - addr2line builds : yes (cached) > - WinDbg builds : no (cached) > - WinDbgCached builds : no (cached) > - BOOST_COMP_GNUC >=3D 4.3.0 : no (cached) > =3D>> Killing runaway build after 7200 seconds with no output > - zlib : yes (cached) > - bzip2 : yes (cached) > - lzma : yes (cached) > - zstd : no (cached) > =3D>> Cleaning up wrkdir > =3D=3D=3D> Cleaning for boost-libs-1.71.0 > Killed > build of devel/boost-libs | boost-libs-1.71.0 ended at Wed Sep 18 = 16:38:56 PDT 2019 > build time: 04:39:04 > !!! build failure encountered !!! >=20 >=20 >=20 > When I made another large jump a couple of days ago > to -r509171 (to match other contexts that I had), the > boost-libs build did not fail. >=20 > (The overall bulk run is still ongoing.) Trying again, I got a backtrace from the bjam while it was stuck running: It never returns from the function_run in frame #6 from what I can tell. Frame #5 does return to frame #6. (gdb) bt #0 object_get_item (obj=3D0x8155b9490) at object.cpp:235 #1 0x0000000010035a34 in object_validate (obj=3D0x8155b9490) at = object.cpp:243 #2 0x0000000010035b10 in object_str (obj=3D0x8155b9490) at = object.cpp:323 #3 0x0000000010035b94 in object_equal (lhs=3D0x8153ce8d8, = rhs=3D0x8155b9490) at object.cpp:339 #4 0x000000001002b714 in list_in (l=3D0x812029300, value=3D0x8155b9490) = at lists.cpp:345 #5 0x000000001002b660 in list_is_sublist (sub=3D0x8125525c0, = l=3D0x812029300) at lists.cpp:308 #6 0x000000001001b3c4 in function_run (function_=3D0x810e29e80, = frame=3D0x3ffffffffffdaba8, s=3D0x1006b960 ) at = function.cpp:4132 #7 0x000000001000a9c4 in evaluate_rule (rule=3D0x8110ef138, = rulename=3D0x8105dac70, frame=3D0x3ffffffffffdaba8) at compile.cpp:150 #8 0x000000001001e05c in function_call_rule (function=3D0x8111b6400, = frame=3D0x3ffffffffffdba38, s=3D0x1006b960 , = n_args=3D2, unexpanded=3D0x8105dac70 "sequence.unique",=20 file=3D0x8112af7e8, line=3D1359) at function.cpp:493 #9 0x000000001001c7d4 in function_run (function_=3D0x8111b6400, = frame=3D0x3ffffffffffdba38, s=3D0x1006b960 ) at = function.cpp:4620 #10 0x000000001000a9c4 in evaluate_rule (rule=3D0x81125afb8, = rulename=3D0x8112b4b28, frame=3D0x3ffffffffffdba38) at compile.cpp:150 #11 0x000000001001e6a4 in function_call_member_rule = (function=3D0x81125e280, frame=3D0x3ffffffffffdc768, s=3D0x1006b960 = , n_args=3D1, rulename=3D0x8110a6bd8, = file=3D0x8112af7e8, line=3D812) at function.cpp:605 #12 0x000000001001c850 in function_run (function_=3D0x81125e280, = frame=3D0x3ffffffffffdc768, s=3D0x1006b960 ) at = function.cpp:4632 #13 0x000000001000a9c4 in evaluate_rule (rule=3D0x8112591b8, = rulename=3D0x8112b0f00, frame=3D0x3ffffffffffdc768) at compile.cpp:150 #14 0x000000001001e05c in function_call_rule (function=3D0x81127de80, = frame=3D0x3ffffffffffdd5f8, s=3D0x1006b960 , = n_args=3D1, unexpanded=3D0x8112b0f00 "generate-really",=20 file=3D0x8112af7e8, line=3D784) at function.cpp:493 #15 0x000000001001c7d4 in function_run (function_=3D0x81127de80, = frame=3D0x3ffffffffffdd5f8, s=3D0x1006b960 ) at = function.cpp:4620 #16 0x000000001000a9c4 in evaluate_rule (rule=3D0x8112c27e8, = rulename=3D0x8112b4798, frame=3D0x3ffffffffffdd5f8) at compile.cpp:150 #17 0x000000001001e6a4 in function_call_member_rule = (function=3D0x811255200, frame=3D0x3ffffffffffde328, s=3D0x1006b960 = , n_args=3D1, rulename=3D0x8110a6bd8, = file=3D0x8112af7e8, line=3D933) at function.cpp:605 #18 0x000000001001c850 in function_run (function_=3D0x811255200, = frame=3D0x3ffffffffffde328, s=3D0x1006b960 ) at = function.cpp:4632 #19 0x000000001000a9c4 in evaluate_rule (rule=3D0x8112bfa58, = rulename=3D0x8112b20d0, frame=3D0x3ffffffffffde328) at compile.cpp:150 #20 0x000000001001e05c in function_call_rule (function=3D0x8111b6d00, = frame=3D0x3ffffffffffdf058, s=3D0x1006b960 , = n_args=3D3,=20 unexpanded=3D0x8112b20d0 "targets.generate-from-reference", = file=3D0x8112af7e8, line=3D1276) at function.cpp:493 #21 0x000000001001c7d4 in function_run (function_=3D0x8111b6d00, = frame=3D0x3ffffffffffdf058, s=3D0x1006b960 ) at = function.cpp:4620 #22 0x000000001000a9c4 in evaluate_rule (rule=3D0x8112d5d58, = rulename=3D0x8112b2018, frame=3D0x3ffffffffffdf058) at compile.cpp:150 #23 0x000000001001e05c in function_call_rule (function=3D0x8111b6400, = frame=3D0x3ffffffffffdfee8, s=3D0x1006b960 , = n_args=3D3, unexpanded=3D0x8112b2018 "generate-dependencies",=20 file=3D0x8112af7e8, line=3D1333) at function.cpp:493 #24 0x000000001001c7d4 in function_run (function_=3D0x8111b6400, = frame=3D0x3ffffffffffdfee8, s=3D0x1006b960 ) at = function.cpp:4620 #25 0x000000001000a9c4 in evaluate_rule (rule=3D0x81125afb8, = rulename=3D0x8112b4b28, frame=3D0x3ffffffffffdfee8) at compile.cpp:150 #26 0x000000001001e6a4 in function_call_member_rule = (function=3D0x81125e280, frame=3D0x3ffffffffffe0c18, s=3D0x1006b960 = , n_args=3D1, rulename=3D0x8110a6bd8, = file=3D0x8112af7e8, line=3D812) at function.cpp:605 #27 0x000000001001c850 in function_run (function_=3D0x81125e280, = frame=3D0x3ffffffffffe0c18, s=3D0x1006b960 ) at = function.cpp:4632 #28 0x000000001000a9c4 in evaluate_rule (rule=3D0x8112591b8, = rulename=3D0x8112b0f00, frame=3D0x3ffffffffffe0c18) at compile.cpp:150 #29 0x000000001001e05c in function_call_rule (function=3D0x81127de80, = frame=3D0x3ffffffffffe1aa8, s=3D0x1006b960 , = n_args=3D1, unexpanded=3D0x8112b0f00 "generate-really",=20 file=3D0x8112af7e8, line=3D784) at function.cpp:493 #30 0x000000001001c7d4 in function_run (function_=3D0x81127de80, = frame=3D0x3ffffffffffe1aa8, s=3D0x1006b960 ) at = function.cpp:4620 #31 0x000000001000a9c4 in evaluate_rule (rule=3D0x8112c27e8, = rulename=3D0x8112b4798, frame=3D0x3ffffffffffe1aa8) at compile.cpp:150 #32 0x000000001001e6a4 in function_call_member_rule = (function=3D0x811523080, frame=3D0x3ffffffffffe27d8, s=3D0x1006b960 = , n_args=3D1, rulename=3D0x8110a6bd8, = file=3D0x81157c968, line=3D943) at function.cpp:605 #33 0x000000001001c850 in function_run (function_=3D0x811523080, = frame=3D0x3ffffffffffe27d8, s=3D0x1006b960 ) at = function.cpp:4632 #34 0x000000001000a9c4 in evaluate_rule (rule=3D0x8115ffc28, = rulename=3D0x8112b2018, frame=3D0x3ffffffffffe27d8) at compile.cpp:150 #35 0x000000001001e05c in function_call_rule (function=3D0x810094b00, = frame=3D0x3ffffffffffe3508, s=3D0x1006b960 , = n_args=3D18, unexpanded=3D0x8105d6958 "$(2)", file=3D0x8105d7350,=20 line=3D107) at function.cpp:493 #36 0x000000001001c7d4 in function_run (function_=3D0x810094b00, = frame=3D0x3ffffffffffe3508, s=3D0x1006b960 ) at = function.cpp:4620 #37 0x000000001000a9c4 in evaluate_rule (rule=3D0x8105f56c8, = rulename=3D0x8105d8d88, frame=3D0x3ffffffffffe3508) at compile.cpp:150 #38 0x000000001001e05c in function_call_rule (function=3D0x81107db00, = frame=3D0x3ffffffffffe4238, s=3D0x1006b960 , = n_args=3D20, unexpanded=3D0x8105d8d88 "modules.call-in",=20 file=3D0x8111346b8, line=3D105) at function.cpp:493 #39 0x000000001001c7d4 in function_run (function_=3D0x81107db00, = frame=3D0x3ffffffffffe4238, s=3D0x1006b960 ) at = function.cpp:4620 #40 0x000000001000a9c4 in evaluate_rule (rule=3D0x81110a2f8, = rulename=3D0x8110a6a08, frame=3D0x3ffffffffffe4238) at compile.cpp:150 #41 0x000000001001e05c in function_call_rule (function=3D0x8111d5b00, = frame=3D0x3ffffffffffe4f68, s=3D0x1006b960 , = n_args=3D3, unexpanded=3D0x8110a6a08 "indirect.call",=20 file=3D0x8113e8548, line=3D59) at function.cpp:493 #42 0x000000001001c7d4 in function_run (function_=3D0x8111d5b00, = frame=3D0x3ffffffffffe4f68, s=3D0x1006b960 ) at = function.cpp:4620 #43 0x000000001000a9c4 in evaluate_rule (rule=3D0x8114350d8, = rulename=3D0x811151050, frame=3D0x3ffffffffffe4f68) at compile.cpp:150 #44 0x000000001001e05c in function_call_rule (function=3D0x8114abe00, = frame=3D0x3ffffffffffe5df8, s=3D0x1006b960 , = n_args=3D3, unexpanded=3D0x811151050 "construct", file=3D0x8112af7e8,=20 line=3D1363) at function.cpp:493 #45 0x000000001001c7d4 in function_run (function_=3D0x8114abe00, = frame=3D0x3ffffffffffe5df8, s=3D0x1006b960 ) at = function.cpp:4620 #46 0x000000001000a9c4 in evaluate_rule (rule=3D0x8113b07b8, = rulename=3D0x8112b4b28, frame=3D0x3ffffffffffe5df8) at compile.cpp:150 #47 0x000000001001e6a4 in function_call_member_rule = (function=3D0x81125e280, frame=3D0x3ffffffffffe6b28, s=3D0x1006b960 = , n_args=3D1, rulename=3D0x8110a6bd8, = file=3D0x8112af7e8, line=3D812) at function.cpp:605 #48 0x000000001001c850 in function_run (function_=3D0x81125e280, = frame=3D0x3ffffffffffe6b28, s=3D0x1006b960 ) at = function.cpp:4632 #49 0x000000001000a9c4 in evaluate_rule (rule=3D0x8112591b8, = rulename=3D0x8112b0f00, frame=3D0x3ffffffffffe6b28) at compile.cpp:150 #50 0x000000001001e05c in function_call_rule (function=3D0x81127de80, = frame=3D0x3ffffffffffe79b8, s=3D0x1006b960 , = n_args=3D1, unexpanded=3D0x8112b0f00 "generate-really",=20 file=3D0x8112af7e8, line=3D784) at function.cpp:493 #51 0x000000001001c7d4 in function_run (function_=3D0x81127de80, = frame=3D0x3ffffffffffe79b8, s=3D0x1006b960 ) at = function.cpp:4620 #52 0x000000001000a9c4 in evaluate_rule (rule=3D0x8112c27e8, = rulename=3D0x8112b4798, frame=3D0x3ffffffffffe79b8) at compile.cpp:150 #53 0x000000001001e6a4 in function_call_member_rule = (function=3D0x811255200, frame=3D0x3ffffffffffe86e8, s=3D0x1006b960 = , n_args=3D1, rulename=3D0x8110a6bd8, = file=3D0x8112af7e8, line=3D933) --Type for more, q to quit, c to continue without paging--=20 at function.cpp:605 #54 0x000000001001c850 in function_run (function_=3D0x811255200, = frame=3D0x3ffffffffffe86e8, s=3D0x1006b960 ) at = function.cpp:4632 #55 0x000000001000a9c4 in evaluate_rule (rule=3D0x8112bfa58, = rulename=3D0x8112b20d0, frame=3D0x3ffffffffffe86e8) at compile.cpp:150 #56 0x000000001001e05c in function_call_rule (function=3D0x8111b6d00, = frame=3D0x3ffffffffffe9418, s=3D0x1006b960 , = n_args=3D3,=20 unexpanded=3D0x8112b20d0 "targets.generate-from-reference", = file=3D0x8112af7e8, line=3D1276) at function.cpp:493 #57 0x000000001001c7d4 in function_run (function_=3D0x8111b6d00, = frame=3D0x3ffffffffffe9418, s=3D0x1006b960 ) at = function.cpp:4620 #58 0x000000001000a9c4 in evaluate_rule (rule=3D0x8112d5d58, = rulename=3D0x8112b2018, frame=3D0x3ffffffffffe9418) at compile.cpp:150 #59 0x000000001001e05c in function_call_rule (function=3D0x8111b6400, = frame=3D0x3ffffffffffea2a8, s=3D0x1006b960 , = n_args=3D3, unexpanded=3D0x8112b2018 "generate-dependencies",=20 file=3D0x8112af7e8, line=3D1333) at function.cpp:493 #60 0x000000001001c7d4 in function_run (function_=3D0x8111b6400, = frame=3D0x3ffffffffffea2a8, s=3D0x1006b960 ) at = function.cpp:4620 #61 0x000000001000a9c4 in evaluate_rule (rule=3D0x81125afb8, = rulename=3D0x8112b4b28, frame=3D0x3ffffffffffea2a8) at compile.cpp:150 #62 0x000000001001e6a4 in function_call_member_rule = (function=3D0x81125e280, frame=3D0x3ffffffffffeafd8, s=3D0x1006b960 = , n_args=3D1, rulename=3D0x8110a6bd8, = file=3D0x8112af7e8, line=3D812) at function.cpp:605 #63 0x000000001001c850 in function_run (function_=3D0x81125e280, = frame=3D0x3ffffffffffeafd8, s=3D0x1006b960 ) at = function.cpp:4632 #64 0x000000001000a9c4 in evaluate_rule (rule=3D0x8112591b8, = rulename=3D0x8112b0f00, frame=3D0x3ffffffffffeafd8) at compile.cpp:150 #65 0x000000001001e05c in function_call_rule (function=3D0x81127de80, = frame=3D0x3ffffffffffebe68, s=3D0x1006b960 , = n_args=3D1, unexpanded=3D0x8112b0f00 "generate-really",=20 file=3D0x8112af7e8, line=3D784) at function.cpp:493 #66 0x000000001001c7d4 in function_run (function_=3D0x81127de80, = frame=3D0x3ffffffffffebe68, s=3D0x1006b960 ) at = function.cpp:4620 #67 0x000000001000a9c4 in evaluate_rule (rule=3D0x8112c27e8, = rulename=3D0x8112b4798, frame=3D0x3ffffffffffebe68) at compile.cpp:150 #68 0x000000001001e6a4 in function_call_member_rule = (function=3D0x811255200, frame=3D0x3ffffffffffecb98, s=3D0x1006b960 = , n_args=3D1, rulename=3D0x8110a6bd8, = file=3D0x8112af7e8, line=3D933) at function.cpp:605 #69 0x000000001001c850 in function_run (function_=3D0x811255200, = frame=3D0x3ffffffffffecb98, s=3D0x1006b960 ) at = function.cpp:4632 #70 0x000000001000a9c4 in evaluate_rule (rule=3D0x8112bfa58, = rulename=3D0x8112b20d0, frame=3D0x3ffffffffffecb98) at compile.cpp:150 #71 0x000000001001e05c in function_call_rule (function=3D0x8111b6d00, = frame=3D0x3ffffffffffed8c8, s=3D0x1006b960 , = n_args=3D3,=20 unexpanded=3D0x8112b20d0 "targets.generate-from-reference", = file=3D0x8112af7e8, line=3D1276) at function.cpp:493 #72 0x000000001001c7d4 in function_run (function_=3D0x8111b6d00, = frame=3D0x3ffffffffffed8c8, s=3D0x1006b960 ) at = function.cpp:4620 #73 0x000000001000a9c4 in evaluate_rule (rule=3D0x8112d5d58, = rulename=3D0x8112b2018, frame=3D0x3ffffffffffed8c8) at compile.cpp:150 #74 0x000000001001e05c in function_call_rule (function=3D0x8111b6400, = frame=3D0x3ffffffffffee758, s=3D0x1006b960 , = n_args=3D3, unexpanded=3D0x8112b2018 "generate-dependencies",=20 file=3D0x8112af7e8, line=3D1333) at function.cpp:493 #75 0x000000001001c7d4 in function_run (function_=3D0x8111b6400, = frame=3D0x3ffffffffffee758, s=3D0x1006b960 ) at = function.cpp:4620 #76 0x000000001000a9c4 in evaluate_rule (rule=3D0x81125afb8, = rulename=3D0x8112b4b28, frame=3D0x3ffffffffffee758) at compile.cpp:150 #77 0x000000001001e6a4 in function_call_member_rule = (function=3D0x81125e280, frame=3D0x3ffffffffffef488, s=3D0x1006b960 = , n_args=3D1, rulename=3D0x8110a6bd8, = file=3D0x8112af7e8, line=3D812) at function.cpp:605 #78 0x000000001001c850 in function_run (function_=3D0x81125e280, = frame=3D0x3ffffffffffef488, s=3D0x1006b960 ) at = function.cpp:4632 #79 0x000000001000a9c4 in evaluate_rule (rule=3D0x8112591b8, = rulename=3D0x8112b0f00, frame=3D0x3ffffffffffef488) at compile.cpp:150 #80 0x000000001001e05c in function_call_rule (function=3D0x81127de80, = frame=3D0x3fffffffffff0318, s=3D0x1006b960 , = n_args=3D1, unexpanded=3D0x8112b0f00 "generate-really",=20 file=3D0x8112af7e8, line=3D784) at function.cpp:493 #81 0x000000001001c7d4 in function_run (function_=3D0x81127de80, = frame=3D0x3fffffffffff0318, s=3D0x1006b960 ) at = function.cpp:4620 #82 0x000000001000a9c4 in evaluate_rule (rule=3D0x8112c27e8, = rulename=3D0x8112b4798, frame=3D0x3fffffffffff0318) at compile.cpp:150 #83 0x000000001001e6a4 in function_call_member_rule = (function=3D0x811255200, frame=3D0x3fffffffffff1048, s=3D0x1006b960 = , n_args=3D1, rulename=3D0x8110a6bd8, = file=3D0x8112af7e8, line=3D933) at function.cpp:605 #84 0x000000001001c850 in function_run (function_=3D0x811255200, = frame=3D0x3fffffffffff1048, s=3D0x1006b960 ) at = function.cpp:4632 #85 0x000000001000a9c4 in evaluate_rule (rule=3D0x8112bfa58, = rulename=3D0x8112b20d0, frame=3D0x3fffffffffff1048) at compile.cpp:150 #86 0x000000001001e05c in function_call_rule (function=3D0x811700480, = frame=3D0x3fffffffffff1d78, s=3D0x1006b960 , = n_args=3D3,=20 unexpanded=3D0x8112b20d0 "targets.generate-from-reference", = file=3D0x8112af7e8, line=3D1276) at function.cpp:493 #87 0x000000001001c7d4 in function_run (function_=3D0x811700480, = frame=3D0x3fffffffffff1d78, s=3D0x1006b960 ) at = function.cpp:4620 #88 0x000000001000a9c4 in evaluate_rule (rule=3D0x8115b36d8, = rulename=3D0x8112b2018, frame=3D0x3fffffffffff1d78) at compile.cpp:150 #89 0x000000001001e05c in function_call_rule (function=3D0x811586300, = frame=3D0x3fffffffffff2aa8, s=3D0x1006b960 , = n_args=3D3, unexpanded=3D0x8112b2018 "generate-dependencies",=20 file=3D0x8112af7e8, line=3D1333) at function.cpp:493 #90 0x000000001001c7d4 in function_run (function_=3D0x811586300, = frame=3D0x3fffffffffff2aa8, s=3D0x1006b960 ) at = function.cpp:4620 #91 0x000000001000a9c4 in evaluate_rule (rule=3D0x8115b2f88, = rulename=3D0x811392ab8, frame=3D0x3fffffffffff2aa8) at compile.cpp:150 #92 0x000000001001e05c in function_call_rule (function=3D0x811700f80, = frame=3D0x3fffffffffff37d8, s=3D0x1006b960 , = n_args=3D1, unexpanded=3D0x811392ab8 "alias-target-class.generate",=20 file=3D0x8105d5018, line=3D403) at function.cpp:493 #93 0x000000001001c7d4 in function_run (function_=3D0x811700f80, = frame=3D0x3fffffffffff37d8, s=3D0x1006b960 ) at = function.cpp:4620 #94 0x000000001000a9c4 in evaluate_rule (rule=3D0x81160b038, = rulename=3D0x811392a78, frame=3D0x3fffffffffff37d8) at compile.cpp:150 #95 0x000000001001e05c in function_call_rule (function=3D0x811586280, = frame=3D0x3fffffffffff4668, s=3D0x1006b960 , = n_args=3D1, unexpanded=3D0x811392a78 "build-multiple",=20 file=3D0x8105d5018, line=3D393) at function.cpp:493 #96 0x000000001001c7d4 in function_run (function_=3D0x811586280, = frame=3D0x3fffffffffff4668, s=3D0x1006b960 ) at = function.cpp:4620 #97 0x000000001000a9c4 in evaluate_rule (rule=3D0x8115b2f58, = rulename=3D0x811397d58, frame=3D0x3fffffffffff4668) at compile.cpp:150 #98 0x000000001001e6a4 in function_call_member_rule = (function=3D0x81125e280, frame=3D0x3fffffffffff5398, s=3D0x1006b960 = , n_args=3D1, rulename=3D0x8110a6bd8, = file=3D0x8112af7e8, line=3D812) at function.cpp:605 #99 0x000000001001c850 in function_run (function_=3D0x81125e280, = frame=3D0x3fffffffffff5398, s=3D0x1006b960 ) at = function.cpp:4632 #100 0x000000001000a9c4 in evaluate_rule (rule=3D0x8112591b8, = rulename=3D0x8112b0f00, frame=3D0x3fffffffffff5398) at compile.cpp:150 #101 0x000000001001e05c in function_call_rule (function=3D0x81127de80, = frame=3D0x3fffffffffff6228, s=3D0x1006b960 , = n_args=3D1, unexpanded=3D0x8112b0f00 "generate-really",=20 file=3D0x8112af7e8, line=3D784) at function.cpp:493 #102 0x000000001001c7d4 in function_run (function_=3D0x81127de80, = frame=3D0x3fffffffffff6228, s=3D0x1006b960 ) at = function.cpp:4620 #103 0x000000001000a9c4 in evaluate_rule (rule=3D0x8112c27e8, = rulename=3D0x8112b4798, frame=3D0x3fffffffffff6228) at compile.cpp:150 #104 0x000000001001e6a4 in function_call_member_rule = (function=3D0x8110b5180, frame=3D0x3fffffffffff7988, s=3D0x1006b960 = , n_args=3D1, rulename=3D0x8110a6bd8, = file=3D0x8105d5918,=20 line=3D797) at function.cpp:605 --Type for more, q to quit, c to continue without paging-- #105 0x000000001001c850 in function_run (function_=3D0x8110b5180, = frame=3D0x3fffffffffff7988, s=3D0x1006b960 ) at = function.cpp:4632 #106 0x00000000100370fc in parse_impl (frame=3D0x3fffffffffff7988) at = parse.cpp:55 #107 0x0000000010037034 in parse_file (f=3D0x8105d5918, = frame=3D0x3fffffffffff7988) at parse.cpp:68 #108 0x000000001001d23c in function_run (function_=3D0x8110b5500, = frame=3D0x3fffffffffff7988, s=3D0x1006b960 ) at = function.cpp:4864 #109 0x000000001000a9c4 in evaluate_rule (rule=3D0x8105f5728, = rulename=3D0x8105d6908, frame=3D0x3fffffffffff7988) at compile.cpp:150 #110 0x000000001001e05c in function_call_rule (function=3D0x8110b5480, = frame=3D0x3fffffffffff86b8, s=3D0x1006b960 , = n_args=3D3, unexpanded=3D0x8105d6908 "load", file=3D0x8105d7350,=20 line=3D295) at function.cpp:493 #111 0x000000001001c7d4 in function_run (function_=3D0x8110b5480, = frame=3D0x3fffffffffff86b8, s=3D0x1006b960 ) at = function.cpp:4620 #112 0x000000001000a9c4 in evaluate_rule (rule=3D0x810e2b7e8, = rulename=3D0x8105d66a0, frame=3D0x3fffffffffff86b8) at compile.cpp:150 #113 0x000000001001e05c in function_call_rule (function=3D0x810094380, = frame=3D0x3fffffffffffa848, s=3D0x1006b960 , = n_args=3D1, unexpanded=3D0x8105d66a0 "import", file=3D0x8105d5bd0,=20 line=3D139) at function.cpp:493 #114 0x000000001001c7d4 in function_run (function_=3D0x810094380, = frame=3D0x3fffffffffffa848, s=3D0x1006b960 ) at = function.cpp:4620 #115 0x00000000100370fc in parse_impl (frame=3D0x3fffffffffffa848) at = parse.cpp:55 #116 0x0000000010037034 in parse_file (f=3D0x8105d5bd0, = frame=3D0x3fffffffffffa848) at parse.cpp:68 #117 0x000000001001d23c in function_run (function_=3D0x810094300, = frame=3D0x3fffffffffffa848, s=3D0x1006b960 ) at = function.cpp:4864 #118 0x00000000100370fc in parse_impl (frame=3D0x3fffffffffffa848) at = parse.cpp:55 #119 0x0000000010037034 in parse_file (f=3D0x8105d59e0, = frame=3D0x3fffffffffffa848) at parse.cpp:68 #120 0x000000001001d23c in function_run (function_=3D0x810094200, = frame=3D0x3fffffffffffa848, s=3D0x1006b960 ) at = function.cpp:4864 #121 0x000000001000a9c4 in evaluate_rule (rule=3D0x810e2b728, = rulename=3D0x8105d3788, frame=3D0x3fffffffffffa848) at compile.cpp:150 #122 0x000000001001e05c in function_call_rule (function=3D0x810094180, = frame=3D0x3fffffffffffbfd8, s=3D0x1006b960 , = n_args=3D1, unexpanded=3D0x8105d3788 "boost-build",=20 file=3D0x8105d5110, line=3D17) at function.cpp:493 #123 0x000000001001c7d4 in function_run (function_=3D0x810094180, = frame=3D0x3fffffffffffbfd8, s=3D0x1006b960 ) at = function.cpp:4620 #124 0x00000000100370fc in parse_impl (frame=3D0x3fffffffffffbfd8) at = parse.cpp:55 #125 0x0000000010037034 in parse_file (f=3D0x8105d5110, = frame=3D0x3fffffffffffbfd8) at parse.cpp:68 #126 0x000000001001d23c in function_run (function_=3D0x810094080, = frame=3D0x3fffffffffffbfd8, s=3D0x1006b960 ) at = function.cpp:4864 #127 0x00000000100370fc in parse_impl (frame=3D0x3fffffffffffbfd8) at = parse.cpp:55 #128 0x0000000010037034 in parse_file (f=3D0x8105d0090, = frame=3D0x3fffffffffffbfd8) at parse.cpp:68 #129 0x000000001002865c in main (argc=3D16, argv=3D0x3fffffffffffd278, = arg_environ=3D0x3fffffffffffd300) at jam.cpp:649 =3D=3D=3D Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away in early 2018-Mar) =3D=3D=3D Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away in early 2018-Mar) From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Sep 19 08:23:15 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69AACFAD55 for ; Thu, 19 Sep 2019 08:23:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marklmi@yahoo.com) Received: from sonic306-19.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (sonic306-19.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com [98.137.68.82]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46Yqc24560z4QGj for ; Thu, 19 Sep 2019 08:23:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marklmi@yahoo.com) X-YMail-OSG: zqvTN7cVM1nvbKrPL3r4PHJWx9SF5fowh165wTL9yOjHaQMSunE6jSs6ULWYxiN q08gR6z0Dy9ZNW.fqwimaKbkQ.nbt5Z.E_3t9iHFwln1.gVDfFcQaMa3T1QtEJL3NU82UcFD661R ru.RG2bQxrSOBSlpfgbyHpSSghk6c4z0hXFDLML1.mlb3ru8RtXN6NyV9TRTbV5M5nkpES5BwOCv nyka__zY_6xnzK7dTFBvGhgk1hyvALtn0bSRfgAc26blGXhc03HkAidLUJ8fLrzK8Crl19FRLHoh UMb_PX7Wexl2aS0zA7qxmZa9RgCqCXHv78GTpjEcSlcBtdjFFFKzXKr.n1GDi32XL3TqoEFcJQf7 0ZpvhnHOxA0_ULFS6Jgn_KuORCWacvndiPE2HweYhpxAQnnUpRZeWBSfFs3tLODTelZ9mpeI.nb2 aGHlIb_gGlPd3UMCFjUE6CSQnZoLyFAvFdOEjPyTZE8q4xBb3NN6Xlw7TEeyetwmXSdUQpRYvf8l n3xvUr1osHXYso0hOxGk3SKiCxQEsoXJFiX8WNv_stWCZFILWVcTHqgifLTzXmsZWde1BmfOjbY. bDW._KeY.j0aPfqr29FWvs0yH4ybgdrYBN92F_NHB2dKAz7gqcoIkhQYL1oGi.vNbLNVz5jpeJ3j 4AmZLWhgJVvXYthsNQ8ib7O2HUoILhoGHrz3CjTCTYnlbYRXs6URKhFC8X2jQabLSjheYRILC5qT C8pWeM5LnVV56J6f1HUY20Ox1Gay7XATsdh_nCPnZ0yIGHE9jAjEI7zswWnD5CniFBsV8FHIBoOv rxohQPZlkJZrfL0B8R7WxaJnaxmc.HXZAFoPPChBMiyElqzLVxOT8o8fu9cKlE.n1qcwxYBvY1Bw 5nDqkzQ1oOKPGGeRzy_QBELPthJACzcgy4IeIfVS1pN2uNfnViyO28lQtLKo0TqEappNUpJHAMzW PMClvOB8Z08h5WBI75_NlDwASp5m2DifsRaRBe4Smyb06O6Or2LrzMcT5CCtwb9wP.elVpAV.8VR SfEcMPsVbu5NGTKKuqoNbGd27TGPAY5LQMD2hWN9aC.8b3BxvOCKv6rK6tWVruS_DckPim14GnH3 2SdkuNR4pCLJPjfsjtPhsHggs9ZIVR6EuMXJRPHMMoRISv2nqz0Bq_FYLxrn3p6xe2DCG6kx0mRU B6y8IDzNa8VhQqVDeyGn6A1r9UG34HdW8sBcN9S_jHZmvH28DWIifNxmYHJtAt89o.Y7oS23fjs4 twITrlSMW5y92AEXbS8sKCrCqVGYk1z8hNymvJXCTUFvZJLZag4d2jelmHTD5yvJrvPw_WoyvCa8 Wz7vHrfG93bmOvZLpna.qaZc0.qdeBRaqBpPO Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic306.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with HTTP; Thu, 19 Sep 2019 08:23:12 +0000 Received: by smtp411.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (Oath Hermes SMTP Server) with ESMTPA ID 578f8eb98421433bcd3352babb914b02; Thu, 19 Sep 2019 08:23:11 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\)) Subject: Re: svn commit: r511878 - in head/devel: llvm90 llvm90/files/openmp xtoolchain-llvm-devel xtoolchain-llvm90: pkg-static: Unable to access file /wrkdirs/usr/. . ./llvm90/bin/ld:No such file or directory From: Mark Millard In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2019 01:23:10 -0700 Cc: FreeBSD Toolchain , Brooks Davis , "freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org" , freebsd-ppc@freebsd.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <77E81C58-99FA-43FA-98A9-C12D7F9806BE@yahoo.com> References: To: Li-Wen Hsu X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46Yqc24560z4QGj X-Spamd-Bar: -- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.42 / 15.00]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ptr:yahoo.com]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[yahoo.com]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; RCPT_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[yahoo.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[yahoo.com,reject]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[yahoo.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:36647, ipnet:98.137.64.0/21, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[yahoo.com.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.93)[-0.931,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[yahoo.com:s=s2048]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.99)[-0.994,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; IP_SCORE(0.00)[ip: (6.74), ipnet: 98.137.64.0/21(0.93), asn: 36647(0.74), country: US(-0.05)]; IP_SCORE_FREEMAIL(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[82.68.137.98.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2019 08:23:15 -0000 On 2019-Sep-19, at 00:33, Li-Wen Hsu wrote: > On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 8:29 AM Mark Millard via freebsd-toolchain > wrote: >>=20 >> [This is from a system-clang 8 based FreeBSD context for >> powerpc64 [ELFv1], not the usual gcc 4.2.1 based context.] >>=20 >> In attempting to update the ports I normally build, jumping >> ahead from -r509171 to ports head -r512281, I got the >> following in the poudriere-devel bulk build: >>=20 >> . . . >> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D >> =3D=3D=3D> Building package for xtoolchain-llvm90-0.2 >> pkg-static: Unable to access file = /wrkdirs/usr/ports/devel/xtoolchain-llvm90/work/stage/usr/local/llvm90/bin= /ld:No such file or directory >> *** Error code 1 >>=20 >> Stop. >> make: stopped in /usr/ports/devel/xtoolchain-llvm90 >> =3D>> Cleaning up wrkdir >> =3D=3D=3D> Cleaning for xtoolchain-llvm90-0.2 >> build of devel/xtoolchain-llvm90 | xtoolchain-llvm90-0.2 ended at Wed = Sep 18 20:08:59 PDT 2019 >> build time: 00:01:42 >> !!! build failure encountered !!! >=20 > (CC list adjusted) >=20 > Here is the patch hopefully can fix this: = https://reviews.freebsd.org/D21680 >=20 That let my build work. Thanks. =3D=3D=3D Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away in early 2018-Mar) From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Sep 19 20:54:53 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 736AB12E3CA for ; Thu, 19 Sep 2019 20:54:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vrwmiller@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ed1-x52e.google.com (mail-ed1-x52e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::52e]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46Z8HJ3pkXz4GpJ; Thu, 19 Sep 2019 20:54:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vrwmiller@gmail.com) Received: by mail-ed1-x52e.google.com with SMTP id t3so4378221edw.13; Thu, 19 Sep 2019 13:54:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=rwBy+nBBCl3mwuJj0CmOyHWDDa+WWmz8QvQwFJx+P9E=; b=YpjD8CQSD7qJny1Kqv2vo5J/rn4KhMssjs4IqwKljSAa7xWUQRwMGp5faH8GJb4YYI trkttrerVC/uI08M915yZgneBgplFu3eUF4hpKt9lG65dbiltAlV5/MovtXnq+sL+Kz8 s8L5o6wZA9a0udL6CI5Kz3hXUb+oKrdZPfm007gTn1Df9IzQ9YF1rCPIzU2P4M5JaKib 9nbFj0W6ikIRMmvCj8BmLc055AguqjFipeTMlELYl6t1djsJh2iMeHuV/LQlAJtg4ApS /rvoDDh3E1nEnqi4HjVWJGHGgXQbt6ri8CLX3zyDO2H3yzNqZ2eIBUBlUi9REF9wnFDN m+bw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=rwBy+nBBCl3mwuJj0CmOyHWDDa+WWmz8QvQwFJx+P9E=; b=qdypkdI+tmxh/fnoWvEhQvs3anuNmLurkmyCN8PUmKIscr+kf1WExbWxwZRtoM4vlc 3C4M6ffvZ7StNh5LmOSnA6q4yRfJ9xLIB5l9cpgJPkkpH4TlU5fW2b0etvMDKUJyxaut VaoaCgRwVbV550uhGrWXMefG6HRKFvnGUKI+58UoWX2Ag214HgoZR59WH8S3F1rpgdmB lu7cNgzOqJgxZj0C1hoAQM7zRlZgpAWb05vVdnRcoZU7x3HD9PRBIfnm2yUjY0bzB5ww 4F1BQ+b/SNyydJceR85/X5Mpmr/xhcHYjdeqqDiQEL/Lh9KIUidZhzKo0CgZ8lJCQBEC lNKQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXRFVhSOD8p6lSaiXz1JEHbDenm6Ipfboix5RTkORURF2w/teas gHFZImHNmoy1WhymmX8ONOZGwQ2txXKX/vYw8vyTSxJU X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzU/dwO0Lnx7XOzi5Ze5Yy1jOYb7m3NZcE6Sm+2Mnfs2LNO2t1XM3Y48PuRB06DpgdoJ3cAEql3kIJuRCGBT7o= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:7621:: with SMTP id c1mr16513237ejn.39.1568926490748; Thu, 19 Sep 2019 13:54:50 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Rick Miller Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2019 16:54:40 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Status of samba ports To: Andrea Venturoli Cc: timur@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46Z8HJ3pkXz4GpJ X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=YpjD8CQS; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of vrwmiller@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4864:20::52e as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=vrwmiller@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.00 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a00:1450:4000::/36:c]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; IP_SCORE(0.00)[ip: (-9.54), ipnet: 2a00:1450::/32(-2.94), asn: 15169(-2.22), country: US(-0.05)]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; URI_COUNT_ODD(1.00)[13]; IP_SCORE_FREEMAIL(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[e.2.5.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.0.0.4.6.8.4.0.5.4.1.0.0.a.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2a00:1450::/32, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2019 20:54:53 -0000 Hi, On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 7:13 AM Andrea Venturoli wrote: > Hello. > > I'd like some information WRT to the status of samba ports, what is > [not] working, what *should* be working and what is planned. > security/sssd with SMB enabled fails to build due to dependency conflicts w/ Samba, which bundles ldb, tbd, tevent, and talloc. Previous to recent commits in these past few months, it was possible to build Samba w/o the bundled libraries, but those commits now install those by default. This makes building security/sssd with SMB=on impossible. Several bug reports describe the problem: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230705 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231846 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238465 A couple problems contribute to the complexity here: * security/sssd is woefully out of date at v1.11 while the project is shipping v2.2 * Samba bundles dependencies * Recent commits to Samba ports have made it impossible to build SSSD w/ SMB=on I've not been able to spend any time because of a plethora of competing priorities though submitted patches can be tested with relative ease. That said, my preference is to always build/install recent software and dependencies. Maintaining old software and dependencies is too much work for so little benefit. This is to say it would be good to see SSSD 2.2 with a dependency on a recent Samba. -- Take care Rick Miller