From owner-freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org Sun Sep 15 06:31:45 2019
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ruby@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1])
by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D138E2E3E
for <freebsd-ruby@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org>;
Sun, 15 Sep 2019 06:31:45 +0000 (UTC)
(envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3])
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46WKKD6vPHz42fp
for <freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org>; Sun, 15 Sep 2019 06:31:44 +0000 (UTC)
(envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org)
Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix)
id ECD3CE2E3A; Sun, 15 Sep 2019 06:31:44 +0000 (UTC)
Delivered-To: ruby@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1])
by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC989E2E39
for <ruby@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org>; Sun, 15 Sep 2019 06:31:44 +0000 (UTC)
(envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3])
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)
client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256)
(Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org",
Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK))
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46WKKD63yqz42fj
for <ruby@freebsd.org>; Sun, 15 Sep 2019 06:31:44 +0000 (UTC)
(envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (portscout.nyi.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:21])
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits))
(Client did not present a certificate)
by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B52D9439F
for <ruby@freebsd.org>; Sun, 15 Sep 2019 06:31:44 +0000 (UTC)
(envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org)
Received: (from portscout@localhost)
by portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x8F6Vi8Q091150;
Sun, 15 Sep 2019 06:31:44 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org)
Message-Id: <201909150631.x8F6Vi8Q091150@portscout.nyi.freebsd.org>
X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.nyi.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to
portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/plain
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2019 06:31:44 +0000
From: portscout@FreeBSD.org
To: ruby@freebsd.org
Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date
X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: FreeBSD-specific Ruby discussions <freebsd-ruby.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ruby>,
<mailto:freebsd-ruby-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ruby/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ruby-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ruby>,
<mailto:freebsd-ruby-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2019 06:31:45 -0000
Dear port maintainer,
The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your
ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check
each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can
safely ignore the entry.
You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations
below.
Full details can be found at the following URL:
http://portscout.freebsd.org/ruby@freebsd.org.html
Port | Current version | New version
------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------
devel/rubygem-hoe | 3.18.0 | 3.18.1
------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------
If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page
for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of
distfiles on a per-port basis:
http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt
Thanks.
From owner-freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org Sun Sep 15 11:22:37 2019
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ruby@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1])
by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 049CEEAAFC
for <freebsd-ruby@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org>;
Sun, 15 Sep 2019 11:22:37 +0000 (UTC)
(envelope-from muujxxwb@magnesium.cloudhosting.co.uk)
Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13])
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46WRmr5mZrz4GFF
for <freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org>; Sun, 15 Sep 2019 11:22:36 +0000 (UTC)
(envelope-from muujxxwb@magnesium.cloudhosting.co.uk)
Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix)
id C4395EAAFB; Sun, 15 Sep 2019 11:22:36 +0000 (UTC)
Delivered-To: ruby@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1])
by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3F31EAAF9
for <ruby@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org>; Sun, 15 Sep 2019 11:22:36 +0000 (UTC)
(envelope-from muujxxwb@magnesium.cloudhosting.co.uk)
Received: from magnesium.cloudhosting.co.uk (magnesium.cloudhosting.co.uk
[77.72.0.118])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(Client did not present a certificate)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46WRmr135Qz4GFD
for <ruby@freebsd.org>; Sun, 15 Sep 2019 11:22:36 +0000 (UTC)
(envelope-from muujxxwb@magnesium.cloudhosting.co.uk)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=techcapital.info; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:
MIME-Version:List-Unsubscribe:Message-ID:Reply-To:From:Date:Subject:To:Sender
:Cc:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:
Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:
List-Help:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive;
bh=3Tw/oSfVktAD9lDa7O1rvBh+3gFv5524prNOA0fG1Ww=; b=AmZ2trRGGTanq/JxSpeMmG2ef1
+HqRei1u4Ve1af04vfhsciKxHzsXUzoYRU21SlgULmrYaah8FyF5cU3WDIAL2GTACtUtc+YdMueX3
dANV99G/Jx95kID2aGTeUEOEi3AsX+ba12avoEmpz+x9hRrTivxrYLXtpdctK/LyNt6vdyrKttzOI
RT8kGwafg1ZnBh35iiMrJw9mi5aruA3kZtUlPR5aIaFyr44eEan8MMAt7aaYcNfhc7ID7VIdzYmh/
1iOwdr3gv9PEViLcQvmDFAm7O05FofNH3VUpOV3QUoYEdQveVVOvQz0KJJOA5Q9YGXyMv0/ApWxLa
1NsJOngA==;
Received: from muujxxwb by magnesium.cloudhosting.co.uk with local (Exim 4.92)
(envelope-from <muujxxwb@magnesium.cloudhosting.co.uk>)
id 1i9SGE-00368A-Fa
for ruby@freebsd.org; Sun, 15 Sep 2019 12:00:06 +0100
To: ruby@freebsd.org
Subject: Audio Transcription Service Provider
X-PHP-Script: techcapital.info/wp-cron.php for 77.72.0.118
X-PHP-Filename: /home/muujxxwb/public_html/wp-cron.php REMOTE_ADDR: 77.72.0.118
Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2019 11:00:02 +0000
From: Jean Young <info@techcapital.info>
Reply-To: Jean Young <info@tecksmew.com>
Message-ID: <d271f217db06704fd770e3560df5ddf6@techcapital.info>
X-Priority: 3
X-Mailer: PHPMailer 5.2.22 (https://github.com/PHPMailer/PHPMailer)
Precedence: bulk
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse,
please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - magnesium.cloudhosting.co.uk
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [7843 7572] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - magnesium.cloudhosting.co.uk
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: magnesium.cloudhosting.co.uk: authenticated_id:
muujxxwb/from_h
X-Authenticated-Sender: magnesium.cloudhosting.co.uk: info@techcapital.info
X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46WRmr135Qz4GFD
X-Spamd-Bar: +++++++++++
Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org;
dkim=pass header.d=techcapital.info header.s=default header.b=AmZ2trRG;
dmarc=none;
spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of muujxxwb@magnesium.cloudhosting.co.uk has
no SPF policy when checking 77.72.0.118)
smtp.mailfrom=muujxxwb@magnesium.cloudhosting.co.uk
X-Spamd-Result: default: False [11.29 / 15.00];
HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[info@tecksmew.com];
REPLYTO_DN_EQ_FROM_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[];
DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[techcapital.info:+];
HAS_X_PRIO_THREE(0.00)[3];
FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[info@techcapital.info,muujxxwb@magnesium.cloudhosting.co.uk];
HAS_X_ANTIABUSE(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[];
MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:~];
ASN(0.00)[asn:12488, ipnet:77.72.0.0/21, country:GR];
MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[];
FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[info@techcapital.info,muujxxwb@magnesium.cloudhosting.co.uk];
HAS_X_AS(0.00)[info@techcapital.info]; ARC_NA(0.00)[];
SH_EMAIL_DBL(7.00)[tecksmew.com];
R_DKIM_ALLOW(0.00)[techcapital.info:s=default];
FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[];
PRECEDENCE_BULK(0.00)[];
IP_SCORE(1.70)[ip: (4.45), ipnet: 77.72.0.0/21(2.22), asn: 12488(1.79),
country: GR(0.04)]; HAS_PHPMAILER_SIG(0.00)[];
DMARC_NA(0.00)[techcapital.info]; HAS_LIST_UNSUB(-0.01)[];
RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; BAD_REP_POLICIES(0.10)[];
NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(1.00)[1.000,0];
REPLYTO_DOM_NEQ_FROM_DOM(0.00)[];
NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(1.00)[1.000,0];
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[118.0.72.77.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.10.0];
HAS_X_GMSV(0.00)[muujxxwb/from_h]; MIME_HTML_ONLY(0.20)[];
R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2];
GREYLIST(0.00)[pass,body]; HAS_X_PHP_SCRIPT(0.00)[]
X-Spam: Yes
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: FreeBSD-specific Ruby discussions <freebsd-ruby.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ruby>,
<mailto:freebsd-ruby-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ruby/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ruby-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ruby>,
<mailto:freebsd-ruby-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2019 11:22:37 -0000
From owner-freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org Sun Sep 15 21:00:58 2019
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ruby@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1])
by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5F22F781D
for <freebsd-ruby@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org>;
Sun, 15 Sep 2019 21:00:58 +0000 (UTC)
(envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3])
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46WhcB2xpzz3Dsd
for <freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org>; Sun, 15 Sep 2019 21:00:58 +0000 (UTC)
(envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org)
Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix)
id 52D4AF781B; Sun, 15 Sep 2019 21:00:58 +0000 (UTC)
Delivered-To: ruby@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1])
by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5298FF781A
for <ruby@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org>; Sun, 15 Sep 2019 21:00:58 +0000 (UTC)
(envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3])
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)
client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256)
(Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org",
Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK))
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46Whc96v1Mz3DsW
for <ruby@FreeBSD.org>; Sun, 15 Sep 2019 21:00:57 +0000 (UTC)
(envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(Client did not present a certificate)
by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C1D3DDEB7
for <ruby@FreeBSD.org>; Sun, 15 Sep 2019 21:00:57 +0000 (UTC)
(envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5])
by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x8FL0v5X095631
for <ruby@FreeBSD.org>; Sun, 15 Sep 2019 21:00:57 GMT
(envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org)
Received: (from bugzilla@localhost)
by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x8FL0vCK095622
for ruby@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 15 Sep 2019 21:00:57 GMT
(envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org)
Message-Id: <201909152100.x8FL0vCK095622@kenobi.freebsd.org>
X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: bugzilla set sender to
bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org using -f
From: bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org
To: ruby@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Problem reports for ruby@FreeBSD.org that need special attention
Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2019 21:00:57 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: FreeBSD-specific Ruby discussions <freebsd-ruby.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ruby>,
<mailto:freebsd-ruby-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ruby/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ruby-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ruby>,
<mailto:freebsd-ruby-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2019 21:00:58 -0000
To view an individual PR, use:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=(Bug Id).
The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users,
which need special attention. These represent problem reports covering
all versions including experimental development code and obsolete releases.
Status | Bug Id | Description
------------+-----------+---------------------------------------------------
In Progress | 237833 | lang/ruby26: irb, rdoc, ri is broken
1 problems total for which you should take action.
From owner-freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org Sun Sep 15 22:52:58 2019
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ruby@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1])
by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64DBFEA885
for <freebsd-ruby@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org>;
Sun, 15 Sep 2019 22:52:58 +0000 (UTC)
(envelope-from purchase@ulterraranches.com)
Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13])
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46Wl5Q1Qwdz3L5b
for <freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org>; Sun, 15 Sep 2019 22:52:58 +0000 (UTC)
(envelope-from purchase@ulterraranches.com)
Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix)
id 30FB6EA884; Sun, 15 Sep 2019 22:52:58 +0000 (UTC)
Delivered-To: ruby@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1])
by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30BE6EA883
for <ruby@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org>; Sun, 15 Sep 2019 22:52:58 +0000 (UTC)
(envelope-from purchase@ulterraranches.com)
Received: from server99897.domain.local (lmstech.cc [111.90.158.186])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(Client did not present a certificate)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46Wl5P45GQz3L5Z
for <ruby@FreeBSD.org>; Sun, 15 Sep 2019 22:52:57 +0000 (UTC)
(envelope-from purchase@ulterraranches.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lmstech.cc;
s=default;
h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:
Reply-To:From:Date:Subject:To:Sender:Cc:Content-ID:Content-Description:
Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:
List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive;
bh=SMsGbrMMmcGrXE708DMdihfaq3a5UCAdl/1XvLaT/7g=; b=SMBgb+SSVV1o32vA90UjayuAxn
aT6NTHX3uZjidoVs67zH2tBT8ovwWRyqvqH5SD/pOjOw2ZteZR1GrsCIuqQ03GRw1LNuOw4zvu339
YVOPVwfp/5ZE6T3+D4yUtG6dskICuc+Fv0m7tpLFkgV11CqOKlf9OiSDRUow0kunyUxNJlcehSXjv
m501X5V3Fgao0vh2MgBaH6mofjPvU8hoN8OLjGLuT8tXpxgH9IhVMttSAVGl/kkYSBN6PSHkj27YD
tEe6e3nBExTsT96ClLggH7cFpJ+/wri4xTv094+Z9TNyOAZp/OF4KLw5+MMy6rQHI/Le5dHdw92qd
KIN+W5GQ==;
Received: from lmstech by server99897.domain.local with local (Exim 4.92)
(envelope-from <purchase@ulterraranches.com>) id 1i9dO1-000613-Ur
for ruby@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 06:52:53 +0800
To: ruby@FreeBSD.org
Subject: KUAMBA NUTS(KB26) Supplier Needed in India
X-PHP-Script: lmstech.cc/dv/pro.php for 89.36.217.82
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1000:pro.php
Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2019 22:52:53 +0000
From: Nina Marinich <purchase@ulterraranches.com>
Reply-To: highrimminter@gmail.com
Message-ID: <d6062a08b2911ee79dea26078d06387b@lmstech.cc>
X-Mailer: Leaf PHPMailer 2.7 (leafmailer.pw)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse,
please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server99897.domain.local
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [1000 994] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - ulterraranches.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: server99897.domain.local: authenticated_id:
lmstech/only user confirmed/virtual account not confirmed
X-Authenticated-Sender: server99897.domain.local: lmstech
X-Source:
X-Source-Args: /opt/cpanel/ea-php54/root/usr/bin/php-cgi
X-Source-Dir: lmstech.cc:/public_html/dv
X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46Wl5P45GQz3L5Z
X-Spamd-Bar: +++++++
Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org;
dkim=pass header.d=lmstech.cc header.s=default header.b=SMBgb+SS;
dmarc=none;
spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of purchase@ulterraranches.com has no SPF
policy when checking 111.90.158.186)
smtp.mailfrom=purchase@ulterraranches.com
X-Spamd-Result: default: False [7.84 / 15.00];
HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[highrimminter@gmail.com];
IP_SCORE(0.34)[asn: 45839(1.64), country: MY(0.07)];
R_MISSING_CHARSET(2.50)[]; HAS_X_SOURCE(0.00)[];
HAS_X_POS(0.00)[]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[];
HFILTER_HELO_IP_A(1.00)[server99897.domain.local];
HFILTER_HELO_NORES_A_OR_MX(0.30)[server99897.domain.local];
DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[lmstech.cc:+]; HAS_X_ANTIABUSE(0.00)[];
FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[];
INTRODUCTION(2.00)[];
ASN(0.00)[asn:45839, ipnet:111.90.158.0/24, country:MY];
MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; HAS_X_AS(0.00)[lmstech]; ARC_NA(0.00)[];
R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[lmstech.cc:s=default]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[];
TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain];
DMARC_NA(0.00)[ulterraranches.com];
FREEMAIL_REPLYTO(0.00)[gmail.com];
NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(1.00)[1.000,0]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1];
REPLYTO_DOM_NEQ_FROM_DOM(0.00)[];
NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(1.00)[1.000,0];
HAS_X_GMSV(0.00)[lmstech/only user confirmed/virtual account not confirmed];
R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2];
GREYLIST(0.00)[pass,body]; HAS_X_PHP_SCRIPT(0.00)[]
X-Spam: Yes
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: FreeBSD-specific Ruby discussions <freebsd-ruby.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ruby>,
<mailto:freebsd-ruby-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ruby/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ruby-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ruby>,
<mailto:freebsd-ruby-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2019 22:52:58 -0000
Hi,
This is to seek your attention to introduce you to a business I found viable in my office here in UK. My name is Nina Marinich, A Ukraine citizen working here in Ulterra Equestrian Ltd. Bred Horse multi National Company UK, our company is in desperate need of a raw material called KUAMBA NUTS(KB26) which is usual plant and harvested locally in India, the first India supplier to the company is no longer in good business relationship with the company due to his high price that he normally quote and for that, the company has changed from buying this product from India and has shifted to another Australia supplier.
But somehow, I have gotten the contacts of the real farmer in India through some of his old bills, now I want to introduce my company to another supplier from India hence deeming it necessary in contacting you, if you don't mind, I will like you to pose as the real farmer, I will present you to the company as the farmer of the KUAMBA NUTS(KB26),
whereas on the other hand,I will give you the contact of the real farmer in India for you to contact and find out if they have products in stock, know their current prices of the KUAMBA NUTS(KB26) by 500grms as it use to be packed, then if you find out all these, I will then link you to the company MD Who will discuss price with you whereas I will be there to facilitate the approval in your name, this will not stop you from your original work place or business unless you feel otherwise.
What prompted my interest into this is because, I discovered from the aforementioned old supplier's bill that he do buy the KUAMBA NUTS(KB26) 500 grms pack locally at the rate of 2,960.00usd and he usually sell to our company at the rate of 6,900.00 usd, suddenly after a long while he changed his price to 7,500 before a colleague could discover the Australia suppliers now. But I am sure, if you can negotiate with the India local farmer at a cheaper rate, then we reduce the price to the company like 6200 or 6,500, definitely you will take over the market with ease and we will make profit.
My Interest.
Since I am sure it is going to work out well, I want to know what will you give me from every gain made on each supply if we conclude on that, we shall kick start by availing you with the contact of the local farmer and after wards when you confirms the availability then I will link you to boss as the step two. Let get started if you consider it worthy of doing.
Hope to hear from you soonest. Please reply me through ulterarranches@gmail.com
Best Regards,
Miss Nina Marinich
Head Of Purchasing Department.
Ulterra Equestrian Ltd.
Telephone: +44 (745) 2380106
E-Mail: ulterarranches@gmail.com
https://www.ulterraranches.com
From owner-freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org Mon Sep 16 14:21:14 2019
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ruby@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1])
by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D776F1237C3
for <freebsd-ruby@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org>;
Mon, 16 Sep 2019 14:21:14 +0000 (UTC)
(envelope-from meta@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13])
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46X7hV5NNvz3Dym
for <freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org>; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 14:21:14 +0000 (UTC)
(envelope-from meta@FreeBSD.org)
Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix)
id B89721237C0; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 14:21:14 +0000 (UTC)
Delivered-To: ruby@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1])
by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B84A71237BF;
Mon, 16 Sep 2019 14:21:14 +0000 (UTC)
(envelope-from meta@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [96.47.72.83])
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)
client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256)
(Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org",
Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK))
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46X7hV4TCQz3Dyl;
Mon, 16 Sep 2019 14:21:14 +0000 (UTC)
(envelope-from meta@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from icepick.vmeta.jp (unknown
[IPv6:2405:6586:2280:1200:c05f:f3ff:f812:e85a])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(Client did not present a certificate)
(Authenticated sender: meta/mail)
by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 52884C7DA;
Mon, 16 Sep 2019 14:21:13 +0000 (UTC)
(envelope-from meta@FreeBSD.org)
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2019 23:21:10 +0900
From: Koichiro Iwao <meta@FreeBSD.org>
To: Steve Wills <swills@FreeBSD.org>
Cc: ports@freebsd.org, ruby@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: FLAVORS for Ruby
Message-ID: <20190916142109.3eleosnwqhovp3bo@icepick.vmeta.jp>
References: <20190913074519.xfu3avb4ihmfzm2o@icepick.vmeta.jp>
<CAALwa8m3NJSckxSyrVTehx3LWxheSJXxUB=iAxr+1HG_2WFtfg@mail.gmail.com>
<20190913090645.buutinhgh2pygb4h@icepick.vmeta.jp>
<8922b3a9-e433-7a6e-e4e5-29f22fbbfb88@FreeBSD.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <8922b3a9-e433-7a6e-e4e5-29f22fbbfb88@FreeBSD.org>
X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 12.1-PRERELEASE amd64
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: FreeBSD-specific Ruby discussions <freebsd-ruby.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ruby>,
<mailto:freebsd-ruby-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ruby/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ruby-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ruby>,
<mailto:freebsd-ruby-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2019 14:21:14 -0000
On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 09:14:01AM -0400, Steve Wills wrote:
> We provide multiple versions of Ruby, it would make sense to provide gems
> for each version. In fact, I worked on this but never finished it:
>
> https://reviews.freebsd.org/D13333
>
> Steve
That's nice. I will do anything that I can so if you need help.
What should we start from with that to continute?
--
meta <meta@FreeBSD.org>
From owner-freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org Mon Sep 16 14:34:08 2019
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ruby@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1])
by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 050B0123D1F
for <freebsd-ruby@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org>;
Mon, 16 Sep 2019 14:34:08 +0000 (UTC)
(envelope-from meta@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3])
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46X7zM6NqLz3Fvv
for <freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org>; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 14:34:07 +0000 (UTC)
(envelope-from meta@FreeBSD.org)
Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix)
id D9929123D1D; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 14:34:07 +0000 (UTC)
Delivered-To: ruby@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1])
by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9367123D1B;
Mon, 16 Sep 2019 14:34:07 +0000 (UTC)
(envelope-from meta@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [96.47.72.83])
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)
client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256)
(Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org",
Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK))
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46X7zM5Ptyz3Fvs;
Mon, 16 Sep 2019 14:34:07 +0000 (UTC)
(envelope-from meta@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from icepick.vmeta.jp (unknown
[IPv6:2405:6586:2280:1200:c05f:f3ff:f812:e85a])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(Client did not present a certificate)
(Authenticated sender: meta/mail)
by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5BA32CA0E;
Mon, 16 Sep 2019 14:34:06 +0000 (UTC)
(envelope-from meta@FreeBSD.org)
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2019 23:34:01 +0900
From: Koichiro Iwao <meta@FreeBSD.org>
To: Antoine Brodin <antoine@freebsd.org>
Cc: FreeBSD Ports <ports@freebsd.org>, ruby@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: FLAVORS for Ruby
Message-ID: <20190916143401.xq5y4iulnurowo7o@icepick.vmeta.jp>
References: <20190913074519.xfu3avb4ihmfzm2o@icepick.vmeta.jp>
<CAALwa8m3NJSckxSyrVTehx3LWxheSJXxUB=iAxr+1HG_2WFtfg@mail.gmail.com>
<20190913090645.buutinhgh2pygb4h@icepick.vmeta.jp>
<CAP7rwcjH6d7AiEL4XeRyQ-evT=dq+Zi8WDTx-aYhye-zq2DKJw@mail.gmail.com>
<20190914042738.r3hedyqtpxsxnd5e@icepick.vmeta.jp>
<CAALwa8=ZE+EiTduwNub_YGh6PGNGoUUfzu49q4Aiym_bDc4BmQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAALwa8=ZE+EiTduwNub_YGh6PGNGoUUfzu49q4Aiym_bDc4BmQ@mail.gmail.com>
X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 12.1-PRERELEASE amd64
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: FreeBSD-specific Ruby discussions <freebsd-ruby.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ruby>,
<mailto:freebsd-ruby-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ruby/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ruby-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ruby>,
<mailto:freebsd-ruby-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2019 14:34:08 -0000
On Sat, Sep 14, 2019 at 08:39:12AM +0200, Antoine Brodin wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 14, 2019 at 6:27 AM Koichiro Iwao <meta@freebsd.org> wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 09:33:43AM -0600, Adam Weinberger wrote:
> > > Systems MUST be able to support concurrent installations of python2.7
> > > and actual python. What is your use case for concurrent ruby?
> >
> > I know the importance of Python 2. Even if it is EoL-ed, it will be
> > required over the next a few years because not a few applications don't
> > migrate to Python 3. So that's true and reasonable.
> >
> > Excuse me that I'm answering your question with a question. What about
> > PHP? Concurrent installation is a MUST?
> >
> > FreeBSD ports allows concurrent installations of multiple Ruby versions
> > however doesn't allow concurrent installations of rubygems for multiple
> > Ruby versions. This inconsistency is the issue for me.
>
> This isn't a valid reason for me.
> Why do you need ruby version 2.4 or 2.5 concurrently installed with version 2.6?
> Is there a bug in version 2.6?
You don't understand the issue. The necessity of concurrent Ruby
versions isn't the issue. The inconsistency is the issue. If rubygems cannot
be installed for multiple ruby versions, FreeBSD ports shouldn't allow
to install multiple versions of Ruby.
You have doubts about installing multiple ruby versions concurrently,
you should also have doubts about why multiple ruby ruby can be installed
concurrently Disabling multiple ruby
Alternatively, Python 3.5 and 3.6 can be installed concurrently and
py- ports can be installed concurrently for each python versions.
--
meta <meta@FreeBSD.org>
From owner-freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org Mon Sep 16 14:39:33 2019
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ruby@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1])
by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB70B123F70
for <freebsd-ruby@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org>;
Mon, 16 Sep 2019 14:39:33 +0000 (UTC)
(envelope-from meta@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3])
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46X85d5pLgz3GPJ
for <freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org>; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 14:39:33 +0000 (UTC)
(envelope-from meta@FreeBSD.org)
Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix)
id C72B2123F6D; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 14:39:33 +0000 (UTC)
Delivered-To: ruby@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1])
by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6DE9123F6C;
Mon, 16 Sep 2019 14:39:33 +0000 (UTC)
(envelope-from meta@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [96.47.72.83])
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)
client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256)
(Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org",
Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK))
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46X85d4wRBz3GPH;
Mon, 16 Sep 2019 14:39:33 +0000 (UTC)
(envelope-from meta@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from icepick.vmeta.jp (unknown
[IPv6:2405:6586:2280:1200:c05f:f3ff:f812:e85a])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(Client did not present a certificate)
(Authenticated sender: meta/mail)
by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6C656CA0F;
Mon, 16 Sep 2019 14:39:32 +0000 (UTC)
(envelope-from meta@FreeBSD.org)
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2019 23:39:29 +0900
From: Koichiro Iwao <meta@FreeBSD.org>
To: Adam Weinberger <adamw@adamw.org>
Cc: FreeBSD Ports <ports@freebsd.org>, ruby@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: FLAVORS for Ruby
Message-ID: <20190916143929.z6vnzoqjme6vw2ey@icepick.vmeta.jp>
References: <20190913074519.xfu3avb4ihmfzm2o@icepick.vmeta.jp>
<CAALwa8m3NJSckxSyrVTehx3LWxheSJXxUB=iAxr+1HG_2WFtfg@mail.gmail.com>
<20190913090645.buutinhgh2pygb4h@icepick.vmeta.jp>
<CAP7rwcjH6d7AiEL4XeRyQ-evT=dq+Zi8WDTx-aYhye-zq2DKJw@mail.gmail.com>
<20190914042738.r3hedyqtpxsxnd5e@icepick.vmeta.jp>
<006FCB74-04EB-4A82-A800-6C7CA273E749@adamw.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <006FCB74-04EB-4A82-A800-6C7CA273E749@adamw.org>
X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 12.1-PRERELEASE amd64
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: FreeBSD-specific Ruby discussions <freebsd-ruby.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ruby>,
<mailto:freebsd-ruby-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ruby/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ruby-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ruby>,
<mailto:freebsd-ruby-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2019 14:39:34 -0000
On Sat, Sep 14, 2019 at 10:52:45AM -0600, Adam Weinberger wrote:
> The issue is that FLAVORS has added a substantial (and painful) complexity to python ports and python.mk. It means that a number of people have had to be hyper-vigilant and watch commits closely to catch errors introduced when people utilize the paradigm incorrectly. It’s a bitter pill, but it’s accepted because the use-case for multiple concurrent python versions is essential.
>
> As Antoine said, inconsistency isn’t a strong enough use case. Which brings us back to the original question: is there a specific use-case for concurrent ruby that makes the substantial increase in cognitive load, complexity, and monitoring worth it?
PHP also have FLAVORS. What about PHP? Multiple concurrent PHP versions
is essential?
--
meta <meta@FreeBSD.org>
From owner-freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org Mon Sep 16 14:54:36 2019
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ruby@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1])
by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F254512482D
for <freebsd-ruby@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org>;
Mon, 16 Sep 2019 14:54:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adamw@adamw.org)
Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3])
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46X8R04xR3z3Ht8
for <freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org>; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 14:54:36 +0000 (UTC)
(envelope-from adamw@adamw.org)
Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix)
id 9B1FE12482A; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 14:54:36 +0000 (UTC)
Delivered-To: ruby@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1])
by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AC59124829
for <ruby@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org>; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 14:54:36 +0000 (UTC)
(envelope-from adamw@adamw.org)
Received: from mail-wr1-x436.google.com (mail-wr1-x436.google.com
[IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::436])
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits)
server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)
client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256)
(Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK))
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46X8Qz5Tl9z3Ht4
for <ruby@freebsd.org>; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 14:54:35 +0000 (UTC)
(envelope-from adamw@adamw.org)
Received: by mail-wr1-x436.google.com with SMTP id l11so39192320wrx.5
for <ruby@freebsd.org>; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 07:54:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=adamw-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623;
h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to
:cc:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=sK+r8jJlSYKP85NPsoBtby+o5DDWzE1RV0g+cdHr+J8=;
b=Z23cWadAAI1CPW8HItMm+G5Db5iscpJ9xGt4kjHLANYOKeQRw9on0y3ekORkQ3+0sd
HYzQ6CqpqMhnuXbqDFad7iyBJ+k7+v9BejWQY8AeqUlkvtNds6QhVfv6Wz+XMsJgLeuX
2icrqjhbZvm49pyAmJaF0gRfCWVHGa2Ez4u4Zy93fVxhvQ55ImmssdvaWwQ5o+NV6/bc
fv+7mwC5brNLrQszpO9s4zTloX5GH/Jmfp/8gZt1XhsxtZnwqy4OK6DQJ2DACA53sYOX
SniTTi0wgF0R838EmqGdbGAemYEzrhaN6qjzlc1HQL5WBtoUE1Njz3ignHBSUMgqxZJl
qC/g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=sK+r8jJlSYKP85NPsoBtby+o5DDWzE1RV0g+cdHr+J8=;
b=tbFr2iuAt+WK3MI/DIzsFzpQfKlOWcXLgGeX5IiAgKe/u5GJ6qtx2PoUkkwlvZR1QV
Igp5H0UxxgchrBMpp3G2OWQnmTHkmc7P5hVqdJtXtn+M6B2tUiv4C/9CeveE/EQMhpSR
CGHh1qX7tgSxwsiU5UZpSOdqR7HzlhVBDv/VNNjX3YGAjF96B4oaLgOjiplmhF+ZnaEn
fYZ2Judy8ouneDEg3CMvir6V5itMmXc9ZCEq/skzJM8pCUpAG51ETYJnYTpo6ikBtzEC
zEXj9AvgW7Ng2KlxWpntkxaVVpZY9F6bGqBL8383N4bCvLoCRWTEBNX9xCI/BkZONEXt
SMDw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAViUuE6OAgyU3JR/5qFqAHCyrAifiiavHAT/Nu0N5DCedvJVi+T
XL9HFoG2ZakqCzttC/7HPvdkuW5GnEYyxdHEHB/cuQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyX4Vq8Wknaz8bJBJGzGwoViEQalccOqteKszR+CyuOTJ69lkuDw4WrZkcdtZzT0o33TJUtoB4/XBINEpWtR5I=
X-Received: by 2002:adf:dfc4:: with SMTP id q4mr178457wrn.54.1568645673518;
Mon, 16 Sep 2019 07:54:33 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20190913074519.xfu3avb4ihmfzm2o@icepick.vmeta.jp>
<CAALwa8m3NJSckxSyrVTehx3LWxheSJXxUB=iAxr+1HG_2WFtfg@mail.gmail.com>
<20190913090645.buutinhgh2pygb4h@icepick.vmeta.jp>
<CAP7rwcjH6d7AiEL4XeRyQ-evT=dq+Zi8WDTx-aYhye-zq2DKJw@mail.gmail.com>
<20190914042738.r3hedyqtpxsxnd5e@icepick.vmeta.jp>
<006FCB74-04EB-4A82-A800-6C7CA273E749@adamw.org>
<20190916143929.z6vnzoqjme6vw2ey@icepick.vmeta.jp>
In-Reply-To: <20190916143929.z6vnzoqjme6vw2ey@icepick.vmeta.jp>
From: Adam Weinberger <adamw@adamw.org>
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2019 08:54:17 -0600
Message-ID: <CAP7rwci6jME-Ef+OkjKWD7mYdnNhobA-9Va5YKmW_6xzcuNj_w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: FLAVORS for Ruby
To: Koichiro Iwao <meta@freebsd.org>
Cc: FreeBSD Ports <ports@freebsd.org>, ruby@freebsd.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46X8Qz5Tl9z3Ht4
X-Spamd-Bar: -----
Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org;
dkim=pass header.d=adamw-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623
header.b=Z23cWadA; dmarc=none;
spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of adamw@adamw.org designates
2a00:1450:4864:20::436 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=adamw@adamw.org
X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-5.39 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[];
NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0];
R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[adamw-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com:s=20150623];
FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3];
R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a00:1450:4000::/36:c];
NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain];
PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[ruby@freebsd.org];
DMARC_NA(0.00)[adamw.org]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[];
TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[];
DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[adamw-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com:+];
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[6.3.4.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.0.0.4.6.8.4.0.5.4.1.0.0.a.2.list.dnswl.org
: 127.0.5.0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+];
IP_SCORE(-2.89)[ip: (-9.19), ipnet: 2a00:1450::/32(-2.95), asn: 15169(-2.24),
country: US(-0.05)];
ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2a00:1450::/32, country:US];
RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: FreeBSD-specific Ruby discussions <freebsd-ruby.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ruby>,
<mailto:freebsd-ruby-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ruby/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ruby-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ruby>,
<mailto:freebsd-ruby-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2019 14:54:37 -0000
On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 8:39 AM Koichiro Iwao <meta@freebsd.org> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Sep 14, 2019 at 10:52:45AM -0600, Adam Weinberger wrote:
> > The issue is that FLAVORS has added a substantial (and painful) complex=
ity to python ports and python.mk. It means that a number of people have ha=
d to be hyper-vigilant and watch commits closely to catch errors introduced=
when people utilize the paradigm incorrectly. It=E2=80=99s a bitter pill, =
but it=E2=80=99s accepted because the use-case for multiple concurrent pyth=
on versions is essential.
> >
> > As Antoine said, inconsistency isn=E2=80=99t a strong enough use case. =
Which brings us back to the original question: is there a specific use-case=
for concurrent ruby that makes the substantial increase in cognitive load,=
complexity, and monitoring worth it?
>
> PHP also have FLAVORS. What about PHP? Multiple concurrent PHP versions
> is essential?
We're going in circles here. I've for the third time now that what
we'd need to get on board is a use case, a description of the end-user
problem that we're trying to solve.
What you've provided (for the fourth time in this thread) is a straw
man argument. What other languages have is irrelevant. We are much
less concerned with "consistency" than with solving end-user problems
in a way that fits the specific use case.
Steve seemed interested in the idea. I'd explore it with him, and I
hope you are able to make it happen. I'm done here.
# Adam
--=20
Adam Weinberger
adamw@adamw.org
https://www.adamw.org
From owner-freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org Mon Sep 16 16:16:58 2019
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ruby@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1])
by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0861F126A0C
for <freebsd-ruby@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org>;
Mon, 16 Sep 2019 16:16:58 +0000 (UTC)
(envelope-from meta@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3])
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46XBG16Rtyz3NZq
for <freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org>; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 16:16:57 +0000 (UTC)
(envelope-from meta@FreeBSD.org)
Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix)
id DB414126A0A; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 16:16:57 +0000 (UTC)
Delivered-To: ruby@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1])
by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAECD126A09;
Mon, 16 Sep 2019 16:16:57 +0000 (UTC)
(envelope-from meta@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [96.47.72.83])
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)
client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256)
(Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org",
Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK))
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46XBG15SKYz3NZp;
Mon, 16 Sep 2019 16:16:57 +0000 (UTC)
(envelope-from meta@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from icepick.vmeta.jp (unknown
[IPv6:2405:6586:2280:1200:c05f:f3ff:f812:e85a])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(Client did not present a certificate)
(Authenticated sender: meta/mail)
by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7C0C0D556;
Mon, 16 Sep 2019 16:16:56 +0000 (UTC)
(envelope-from meta@FreeBSD.org)
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2019 01:16:50 +0900
From: Koichiro Iwao <meta@FreeBSD.org>
To: Adam Weinberger <adamw@adamw.org>
Cc: FreeBSD Ports <ports@freebsd.org>, ruby@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: FLAVORS for Ruby
Message-ID: <20190916161650.4ofb2o27tfxif57e@icepick.vmeta.jp>
References: <20190913074519.xfu3avb4ihmfzm2o@icepick.vmeta.jp>
<CAALwa8m3NJSckxSyrVTehx3LWxheSJXxUB=iAxr+1HG_2WFtfg@mail.gmail.com>
<20190913090645.buutinhgh2pygb4h@icepick.vmeta.jp>
<CAP7rwcjH6d7AiEL4XeRyQ-evT=dq+Zi8WDTx-aYhye-zq2DKJw@mail.gmail.com>
<20190914042738.r3hedyqtpxsxnd5e@icepick.vmeta.jp>
<006FCB74-04EB-4A82-A800-6C7CA273E749@adamw.org>
<20190916143929.z6vnzoqjme6vw2ey@icepick.vmeta.jp>
<CAP7rwci6jME-Ef+OkjKWD7mYdnNhobA-9Va5YKmW_6xzcuNj_w@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <CAP7rwci6jME-Ef+OkjKWD7mYdnNhobA-9Va5YKmW_6xzcuNj_w@mail.gmail.com>
X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 12.1-PRERELEASE amd64
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: FreeBSD-specific Ruby discussions <freebsd-ruby.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ruby>,
<mailto:freebsd-ruby-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ruby/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ruby-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ruby>,
<mailto:freebsd-ruby-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2019 16:16:58 -0000
On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 08:54:17AM -0600, Adam Weinberger wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 8:39 AM Koichiro Iwao <meta@freebsd.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Sep 14, 2019 at 10:52:45AM -0600, Adam Weinberger wrote:
> > > The issue is that FLAVORS has added a substantial (and painful) complexity to python ports and python.mk. It means that a number of people have had to be hyper-vigilant and watch commits closely to catch errors introduced when people utilize the paradigm incorrectly. It’s a bitter pill, but it’s accepted because the use-case for multiple concurrent python versions is essential.
> > >
> > > As Antoine said, inconsistency isn’t a strong enough use case. Which brings us back to the original question: is there a specific use-case for concurrent ruby that makes the substantial increase in cognitive load, complexity, and monitoring worth it?
> >
> > PHP also have FLAVORS. What about PHP? Multiple concurrent PHP versions
> > is essential?
>
> We're going in circles here. I've for the third time now that what
> we'd need to get on board is a use case, a description of the end-user
> problem that we're trying to solve.
>
> What you've provided (for the fourth time in this thread) is a straw
> man argument. What other languages have is irrelevant. We are much
> less concerned with "consistency" than with solving end-user problems
> in a way that fits the specific use case.
>
> Steve seemed interested in the idea. I'd explore it with him, and I
> hope you are able to make it happen. I'm done here.
Thanks. I see a gap between you and me but I'll give it a try anyway
with swills.
You: If there's no valid reasons, don't do it.
Me: If there's no invalid reasons, try it.
I believe that the reason Ruby don't have FLAVORS is just nobody worked
on that. In fact, swills worked on that a little.
BTW, if I can do something only necessary, what a boring life.
--
meta <meta@FreeBSD.org>
From owner-freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org Tue Sep 17 06:40:43 2019
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ruby@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1])
by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78B09F93C1
for <freebsd-ruby@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org>;
Tue, 17 Sep 2019 06:40:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mat@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13])
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46XYQg2YT9z4bYP
for <freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org>; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 06:40:43 +0000 (UTC)
(envelope-from mat@FreeBSD.org)
Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix)
id 53A8FF93C0; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 06:40:43 +0000 (UTC)
Delivered-To: ruby@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1])
by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 530F7F93BE;
Tue, 17 Sep 2019 06:40:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mat@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::24b:4])
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)
client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256)
(Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org",
Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK))
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46XYQg1PQTz4bYM;
Tue, 17 Sep 2019 06:40:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mat@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from mail.j.mat.cc (owncloud.cube.mat.cc [79.143.240.228])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(Client CN "mail.mat.cc", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK))
(Authenticated sender: mat/mail)
by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D81921364F;
Tue, 17 Sep 2019 06:40:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mat@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from atuin.in.mat.cc (unknown
[IPv6:2a01:678:42:ffff:3e15:c2ff:fec4:452e])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mat@mat.cc)
by mail.j.mat.cc (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 78D1F942D80;
Tue, 17 Sep 2019 06:40:40 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2019 08:40:39 +0200
From: Mathieu Arnold <mat@FreeBSD.org>
To: Koichiro Iwao <meta@FreeBSD.org>
Cc: Adam Weinberger <adamw@adamw.org>, FreeBSD Ports <ports@freebsd.org>,
ruby@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: FLAVORS for Ruby
Message-ID: <20190917064039.7qhnw3lds2zaxdl5@atuin.in.mat.cc>
References: <20190913074519.xfu3avb4ihmfzm2o@icepick.vmeta.jp>
<CAALwa8m3NJSckxSyrVTehx3LWxheSJXxUB=iAxr+1HG_2WFtfg@mail.gmail.com>
<20190913090645.buutinhgh2pygb4h@icepick.vmeta.jp>
<CAP7rwcjH6d7AiEL4XeRyQ-evT=dq+Zi8WDTx-aYhye-zq2DKJw@mail.gmail.com>
<20190914042738.r3hedyqtpxsxnd5e@icepick.vmeta.jp>
<006FCB74-04EB-4A82-A800-6C7CA273E749@adamw.org>
<20190916143929.z6vnzoqjme6vw2ey@icepick.vmeta.jp>
<CAP7rwci6jME-Ef+OkjKWD7mYdnNhobA-9Va5YKmW_6xzcuNj_w@mail.gmail.com>
<20190916161650.4ofb2o27tfxif57e@icepick.vmeta.jp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ezlm5sg6hqdmgwqe"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20190916161650.4ofb2o27tfxif57e@icepick.vmeta.jp>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: FreeBSD-specific Ruby discussions <freebsd-ruby.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ruby>,
<mailto:freebsd-ruby-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ruby/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ruby-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ruby>,
<mailto:freebsd-ruby-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2019 06:40:43 -0000
--ezlm5sg6hqdmgwqe
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 01:16:50AM +0900, Koichiro Iwao wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 08:54:17AM -0600, Adam Weinberger wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 8:39 AM Koichiro Iwao <meta@freebsd.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sat, Sep 14, 2019 at 10:52:45AM -0600, Adam Weinberger wrote:
> > > > The issue is that FLAVORS has added a substantial (and painful) com=
plexity to python ports and python.mk. It means that a number of people hav=
e had to be hyper-vigilant and watch commits closely to catch errors introd=
uced when people utilize the paradigm incorrectly. It=E2=80=99s a bitter pi=
ll, but it=E2=80=99s accepted because the use-case for multiple concurrent =
python versions is essential.
> > > >
> > > > As Antoine said, inconsistency isn=E2=80=99t a strong enough use ca=
se. Which brings us back to the original question: is there a specific use-=
case for concurrent ruby that makes the substantial increase in cognitive l=
oad, complexity, and monitoring worth it?
> > >
> > > PHP also have FLAVORS. What about PHP? Multiple concurrent PHP versio=
ns
> > > is essential?
> >=20
> > We're going in circles here. I've for the third time now that what
> > we'd need to get on board is a use case, a description of the end-user
> > problem that we're trying to solve.
> >=20
> > What you've provided (for the fourth time in this thread) is a straw
> > man argument. What other languages have is irrelevant. We are much
> > less concerned with "consistency" than with solving end-user problems
> > in a way that fits the specific use case.
> >=20
> > Steve seemed interested in the idea. I'd explore it with him, and I
> > hope you are able to make it happen. I'm done here.
>=20
> Thanks. I see a gap between you and me but I'll give it a try anyway
> with swills.
>=20
> You: If there's no valid reasons, don't do it.
> Me: If there's no invalid reasons, try it.
>=20
> I believe that the reason Ruby don't have FLAVORS is just nobody worked
> on that. In fact, swills worked on that a little.
>=20
> BTW, if I can do something only necessary, what a boring life.
What we are all trying to say is that adding flavors for ruby will have
a big impact on build time and ressources required for building.
If all you want is to have ruby flavors for the kicks of it, then I am
glad to tell you that no, it will not be done.
Now, the question is, why would someone need to have ruby flavors?
The answer cannot be "because it should be fun" or "there is no reason
there should not be".
Give us a real reason about why it would be required.
--=20
Mathieu Arnold
--ezlm5sg6hqdmgwqe
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=n3+o
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--ezlm5sg6hqdmgwqe--
From owner-freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org Tue Sep 17 07:29:37 2019
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ruby@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1])
by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B4F3FA07B
for <freebsd-ruby@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org>;
Tue, 17 Sep 2019 07:29:37 +0000 (UTC)
(envelope-from dewaynegeraghty@gmail.com)
Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3])
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46XZW51KzSz4dWT
for <freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org>; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 07:29:37 +0000 (UTC)
(envelope-from dewaynegeraghty@gmail.com)
Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix)
id 2C083FA07A; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 07:29:37 +0000 (UTC)
Delivered-To: ruby@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1])
by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B834FA078;
Tue, 17 Sep 2019 07:29:37 +0000 (UTC)
(envelope-from dewaynegeraghty@gmail.com)
Received: from mail-wm1-x330.google.com (mail-wm1-x330.google.com
[IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::330])
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits)
server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)
client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256)
(Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK))
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46XZW433lZz4dWR;
Tue, 17 Sep 2019 07:29:36 +0000 (UTC)
(envelope-from dewaynegeraghty@gmail.com)
Received: by mail-wm1-x330.google.com with SMTP id x2so1963003wmj.2;
Tue, 17 Sep 2019 00:29:36 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to
:cc; bh=21P5C39VCL4emSN8XuhsbdH/78177ReoFJZ2xdsMiyM=;
b=ZFzJ/iMA1vnQjtXojGgoBJ9rJNVCA9/COonN8T+KI71bKC7EKm+jnX7yBVX19u0ug4
FhP1Yomw6Sr0T6nVFbBj+YeKWE5T8wQUb+5FXGgOj2Czei9AmEwl02ecNkSHTSQWg0rj
ZZS5BaCxukR7sntDGlqMq2pIddZUyK90ZrPrHoFSPnexhUg9ThnuPOSCl5MGX2v7DZLC
75hBWZuguIZSgK5Sr/rNrQerqoqfqPornOgvwWQ1bqWlAUM+9d6VKeXfJwRX/3i3wZgQ
nmFZFw/xzNpU9YjOofxqKJeHCMzA8U3YO4gxhmnVNW21ZdTDVSuqJwgVcnzFNhKD0Y3g
OulA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
:message-id:subject:to:cc;
bh=21P5C39VCL4emSN8XuhsbdH/78177ReoFJZ2xdsMiyM=;
b=nspCYIRRaR15RsuG8g89yPd9E/IrMAL1RwYF18LG0NjKIVD9pWGYzhP7ukLPeabH6S
ueHeoIqF3YHysubo7TjluXTjNLk5wclJY9egoCPqeFLj70oNxBCvVJE7gBD6xmy6rckx
iIRvPwXbMg53Ti1fUiOCJ7jp3SQNoqHTsFOI4NKwE+xlE1NKfI5zSQChPNkVgguM6BkA
8QOsi063ldaS7IZvyZv8zpUG+0s3/VTyQ6UgMxqx8mnnlitRCEsPLupJTUr53aOfdbGN
7MFXpNu1GncOI0ClkUbbYHhWcbS430i8Nfmz+why2ttP46qWOg1mh5dasI1pUHIpawbc
KBxg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWPqnWedt5gk+8bR0X2fm0s7a/ReQh6y/eN/7L8GIi3NQKrREw6
sm+Etdzs3UZEv15cEMauveykA5CJozp8HV0wPiWG+SCl
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqynoC1d6IElwvnEhPeoWsM/0Yq89ujaHxFB2+HAw0ZlFHDQhlUBU4YGg1VNeqMcs7o8AhxRaufVBSDbkSlSqgI=
X-Received: by 2002:a1c:9c96:: with SMTP id f144mr2339492wme.96.1568705374436;
Tue, 17 Sep 2019 00:29:34 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20190913074519.xfu3avb4ihmfzm2o@icepick.vmeta.jp>
<CAALwa8m3NJSckxSyrVTehx3LWxheSJXxUB=iAxr+1HG_2WFtfg@mail.gmail.com>
<20190913090645.buutinhgh2pygb4h@icepick.vmeta.jp>
<CAP7rwcjH6d7AiEL4XeRyQ-evT=dq+Zi8WDTx-aYhye-zq2DKJw@mail.gmail.com>
<20190914042738.r3hedyqtpxsxnd5e@icepick.vmeta.jp>
<006FCB74-04EB-4A82-A800-6C7CA273E749@adamw.org>
<20190916143929.z6vnzoqjme6vw2ey@icepick.vmeta.jp>
<CAP7rwci6jME-Ef+OkjKWD7mYdnNhobA-9Va5YKmW_6xzcuNj_w@mail.gmail.com>
<20190916161650.4ofb2o27tfxif57e@icepick.vmeta.jp>
<20190917064039.7qhnw3lds2zaxdl5@atuin.in.mat.cc>
In-Reply-To: <20190917064039.7qhnw3lds2zaxdl5@atuin.in.mat.cc>
From: Dewayne Geraghty <dewaynegeraghty@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2019 17:29:06 +1000
Message-ID: <CAGnMC6oHcYwfpForY5QFmxhrNYiMGFERYz6Jb_7ZC0FqwEb7tg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: FLAVORS for Ruby
To: Koichiro Iwao <meta@freebsd.org>
Cc: FreeBSD Ports <ports@freebsd.org>, ruby@freebsd.org
X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46XZW433lZz4dWR
X-Spamd-Bar: --
Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org;
dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=ZFzJ/iMA;
dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com;
spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of dewaynegeraghty@gmail.com designates
2a00:1450:4864:20::330 as permitted sender)
smtp.mailfrom=dewaynegeraghty@gmail.com
X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.00 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[];
NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0];
R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[];
RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3];
R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a00:1450:4000::/36];
FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com];
MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain];
TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0];
TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE_FREEMAIL(0.00)[];
IP_SCORE(0.00)[ip: (-9.30), ipnet: 2a00:1450::/32(-2.95), asn: 15169(-2.24),
country: US(-0.05)]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+];
DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none];
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[0.3.3.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.0.0.4.6.8.4.0.5.4.1.0.0.a.2.list.dnswl.org
: 127.0.5.0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[];
MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~];
FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com];
ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2a00:1450::/32, country:US];
RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[];
DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: FreeBSD-specific Ruby discussions <freebsd-ruby.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ruby>,
<mailto:freebsd-ruby-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ruby/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ruby-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ruby>,
<mailto:freebsd-ruby-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2019 07:29:37 -0000
Bottom line: flavors came into being to satisfy specific needs. Python 2
underwent substantial changes during the upgrade to python 3, to the extent
that many (most) python applications would cease to function. Similarly
php5 to php7. Without flavours the user-base would've been severly
impacted during the upgrade transition where some fraction of their
applications would fail. Flavours, though I didn't appreciate it at the
time, was/is a really smart move and has saved most of us contorting our
systems with different versions of the "same" software
I suppose if the ruby developers make such a substantial change to the
language that applications break, then adding flavors to ruby might be
worthwhile. As stated, there is substantial effort required and the need
significant. And as I still have "ports" that use python2 (though most use
python3), I greatly appeciate their effort.
Is there a specific issue, ie breakage requiring ruby flavors?
From owner-freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org Tue Sep 17 07:38:40 2019
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ruby@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1])
by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CF2DFA2FE
for <freebsd-ruby@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org>;
Tue, 17 Sep 2019 07:38:40 +0000 (UTC)
(envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3])
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46XZjW72ncz4dvK
for <freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org>; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 07:38:39 +0000 (UTC)
(envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org)
Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix)
id F1BF2FA2FD; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 07:38:39 +0000 (UTC)
Delivered-To: ruby@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1])
by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F18D1FA2FC
for <ruby@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org>; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 07:38:39 +0000 (UTC)
(envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3])
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)
client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256)
(Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org",
Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK))
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46XZjW6DqZz4dvJ
for <ruby@freebsd.org>; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 07:38:39 +0000 (UTC)
(envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (portscout.nyi.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:21])
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits))
(Client did not present a certificate)
by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA91A5319
for <ruby@freebsd.org>; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 07:38:39 +0000 (UTC)
(envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org)
Received: (from portscout@localhost)
by portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x8H7cdp1092874;
Tue, 17 Sep 2019 07:38:39 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org)
Message-Id: <201909170738.x8H7cdp1092874@portscout.nyi.freebsd.org>
X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.nyi.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to
portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/plain
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2019 07:38:39 +0000
From: portscout@FreeBSD.org
To: ruby@freebsd.org
Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date
X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: FreeBSD-specific Ruby discussions <freebsd-ruby.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ruby>,
<mailto:freebsd-ruby-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ruby/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ruby-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ruby>,
<mailto:freebsd-ruby-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2019 07:38:40 -0000
Dear port maintainer,
The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your
ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check
each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can
safely ignore the entry.
You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations
below.
Full details can be found at the following URL:
http://portscout.freebsd.org/ruby@freebsd.org.html
Port | Current version | New version
------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------
devel/rubygem-simplecov | 0.16.1 | 0.17.1
------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------
security/rubygem-doorkeeper | 5.0.2 | 5.2.0
------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------
If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page
for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of
distfiles on a per-port basis:
http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt
Thanks.
From owner-freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org Tue Sep 17 11:16:58 2019
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ruby@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1])
by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19EE3FF989
for <freebsd-ruby@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org>;
Tue, 17 Sep 2019 11:16:58 +0000 (UTC)
(envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3])
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46XgYP6vlKz3Npl
for <freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org>; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 11:16:57 +0000 (UTC)
(envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org)
Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix)
id EB32AFF987; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 11:16:57 +0000 (UTC)
Delivered-To: ruby@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1])
by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAA13FF985;
Tue, 17 Sep 2019 11:16:57 +0000 (UTC)
(envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::24b:4])
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)
client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256)
(Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org",
Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK))
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46XgYP5yZSz3Npj;
Tue, 17 Sep 2019 11:16:57 +0000 (UTC)
(envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from ivaldir.etoilebsd.net (etoilebsd.net [178.32.217.76])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: bapt)
by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 88D53155C7;
Tue, 17 Sep 2019 11:16:57 +0000 (UTC)
(envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org)
Received: by ivaldir.etoilebsd.net (Postfix, from userid 1001)
id 2486BB76D6; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 13:16:56 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2019 13:16:56 +0200
From: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org>
To: Dewayne Geraghty <dewaynegeraghty@gmail.com>
Cc: Koichiro Iwao <meta@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD Ports <ports@freebsd.org>,
ruby@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: FLAVORS for Ruby
Message-ID: <20190917111655.3x5chgmu4gsemlba@ivaldir.net>
References: <CAALwa8m3NJSckxSyrVTehx3LWxheSJXxUB=iAxr+1HG_2WFtfg@mail.gmail.com>
<20190913090645.buutinhgh2pygb4h@icepick.vmeta.jp>
<CAP7rwcjH6d7AiEL4XeRyQ-evT=dq+Zi8WDTx-aYhye-zq2DKJw@mail.gmail.com>
<20190914042738.r3hedyqtpxsxnd5e@icepick.vmeta.jp>
<006FCB74-04EB-4A82-A800-6C7CA273E749@adamw.org>
<20190916143929.z6vnzoqjme6vw2ey@icepick.vmeta.jp>
<CAP7rwci6jME-Ef+OkjKWD7mYdnNhobA-9Va5YKmW_6xzcuNj_w@mail.gmail.com>
<20190916161650.4ofb2o27tfxif57e@icepick.vmeta.jp>
<20190917064039.7qhnw3lds2zaxdl5@atuin.in.mat.cc>
<CAGnMC6oHcYwfpForY5QFmxhrNYiMGFERYz6Jb_7ZC0FqwEb7tg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ngaaipn67ky2z2pc"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAGnMC6oHcYwfpForY5QFmxhrNYiMGFERYz6Jb_7ZC0FqwEb7tg@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: FreeBSD-specific Ruby discussions <freebsd-ruby.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ruby>,
<mailto:freebsd-ruby-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ruby/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ruby-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ruby>,
<mailto:freebsd-ruby-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2019 11:16:58 -0000
--ngaaipn67ky2z2pc
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 05:29:06PM +1000, Dewayne Geraghty wrote:
> Bottom line: flavors came into being to satisfy specific needs. Python 2
> underwent substantial changes during the upgrade to python 3, to the exte=
nt
> that many (most) python applications would cease to function. Similarly
> php5 to php7. Without flavours the user-base would've been severly
> impacted during the upgrade transition where some fraction of their
> applications would fail. Flavours, though I didn't appreciate it at the
> time, was/is a really smart move and has saved most of us contorting our
> systems with different versions of the "same" software
>=20
> I suppose if the ruby developers make such a substantial change to the
> language that applications break, then adding flavors to ruby might be
> worthwhile. As stated, there is substantial effort required and the need
> significant. And as I still have "ports" that use python2 (though most u=
se
> python3), I greatly appeciate their effort.
>=20
> Is there a specific issue, ie breakage requiring ruby flavors?
Thank you Dewayne, that is exactly it!
Flavors tends to complexify the ports framework, so they have to be used wi=
th
caution. the more flavours that are being added the more impacted it has on=
the
package building performances, but also on the complexity of the ports tree
itself. It also complexify the life of maintainers who have then to test ev=
ery
possible flavors.
We at portmgr have decided to make a rule to try to find the right balance.
If you look at flarvors for python you can see that the only supporte flavo=
r are:
one flavor for python3 and one flavor for python2 for the reason exposed by
Dewayne exactly. Same goes for php.
The last point is about end users, lots of end user are confused when you h=
ave
too many choices, each time a decision is made on the ports tree, the main
target should be to think what will happen for end users. how can they chose
what is the right version for them etc.
What about big "ruby" project like puppet, should we have 3 version of it
because ruby is flavored? how will end user pick up which is the right one =
here.
Again we do try to find the right balance.
So yes if someone has strong arguments in favor of ruby flavors that will
improve the user experience, then we will gladely add it.
Also note that if you look at python's flavors, while is simplified a lot t=
he
life of end users we have ended up in a quite poor maintenance situation, l=
ots
of ports are packages for all the flavours while not working with all of th=
em,
many end user programs are being packages in both flavours for the sake of =
it,
but it confuses users for now reasons. That is something we should be caref=
ul
about.
As for the build time arguments, yes it is true as well and if someone want=
s kill
that arguments, there are room of improvements in both poudriere and pkg for
which we will be pleased to get working on ;)
Best regards,
Bapt
--ngaaipn67ky2z2pc
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=JgWL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--ngaaipn67ky2z2pc--
From owner-freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org Tue Sep 17 11:34:53 2019
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ruby@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1])
by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB6011211DF
for <freebsd-ruby@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org>;
Tue, 17 Sep 2019 11:34:53 +0000 (UTC)
(envelope-from swills@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3])
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46Xgy550kNz3Px5
for <freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org>; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 11:34:53 +0000 (UTC)
(envelope-from swills@FreeBSD.org)
Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix)
id A9FB71211DE; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 11:34:53 +0000 (UTC)
Delivered-To: ruby@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1])
by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9A951211DC;
Tue, 17 Sep 2019 11:34:53 +0000 (UTC)
(envelope-from swills@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from mouf.net (mouf.net [IPv6:2607:fc50:0:4400:216:3eff:fe69:33b3])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(Client CN "mouf.net", Issuer "mouf.net" (not verified))
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46Xgy53w8xz3Px3;
Tue, 17 Sep 2019 11:34:53 +0000 (UTC)
(envelope-from swills@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from lrrr.mouf.net (cpe-174-109-174-192.nc.res.rr.com
[174.109.174.192]) (authenticated bits=0)
by mouf.net (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id x8HBYXf4060560
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT);
Tue, 17 Sep 2019 11:34:39 GMT (envelope-from swills@FreeBSD.org)
Subject: Re: FLAVORS for Ruby
To: Mathieu Arnold <mat@FreeBSD.org>, Koichiro Iwao <meta@FreeBSD.org>
Cc: FreeBSD Ports <ports@freebsd.org>, ruby@freebsd.org,
Adam Weinberger <adamw@adamw.org>
References: <20190913074519.xfu3avb4ihmfzm2o@icepick.vmeta.jp>
<CAALwa8m3NJSckxSyrVTehx3LWxheSJXxUB=iAxr+1HG_2WFtfg@mail.gmail.com>
<20190913090645.buutinhgh2pygb4h@icepick.vmeta.jp>
<CAP7rwcjH6d7AiEL4XeRyQ-evT=dq+Zi8WDTx-aYhye-zq2DKJw@mail.gmail.com>
<20190914042738.r3hedyqtpxsxnd5e@icepick.vmeta.jp>
<006FCB74-04EB-4A82-A800-6C7CA273E749@adamw.org>
<20190916143929.z6vnzoqjme6vw2ey@icepick.vmeta.jp>
<CAP7rwci6jME-Ef+OkjKWD7mYdnNhobA-9Va5YKmW_6xzcuNj_w@mail.gmail.com>
<20190916161650.4ofb2o27tfxif57e@icepick.vmeta.jp>
<20190917064039.7qhnw3lds2zaxdl5@atuin.in.mat.cc>
From: Steve Wills <swills@FreeBSD.org>
Message-ID: <e33cd87b-c000-a219-c30a-c05a183135a7@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2019 07:34:27 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/68.1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20190917064039.7qhnw3lds2zaxdl5@atuin.in.mat.cc>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3
(mouf.net [199.48.129.64]); Tue, 17 Sep 2019 11:34:39 +0000 (UTC)
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 required=4.5 tests=KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS autolearn=no
autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on mouf.net
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.99.2 at mouf.net
X-Virus-Status: Clean
X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46Xgy53w8xz3Px3
X-Spamd-Bar: -----
Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org;
none
X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-5.99 / 15.00];
NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.99)[-0.991,0];
NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; REPLY(-4.00)[]
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: FreeBSD-specific Ruby discussions <freebsd-ruby.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ruby>,
<mailto:freebsd-ruby-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ruby/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ruby-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ruby>,
<mailto:freebsd-ruby-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2019 11:34:53 -0000
Hi,
On 9/17/19 2:40 AM, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
>
> What we are all trying to say is that adding flavors for ruby will have
> a big impact on build time and ressources required for building.
>
> If all you want is to have ruby flavors for the kicks of it, then I am
> glad to tell you that no, it will not be done.
>
> Now, the question is, why would someone need to have ruby flavors?
>
> The answer cannot be "because it should be fun" or "there is no reason
> there should not be".
>
> Give us a real reason about why it would be required.
>
We have multiple versions of Ruby, we should provide the gems for each
version. Right now, there is no way for users of Ruby 2.4 to install gem
packages except to change the default ruby and then build their own
packages. We want people to have fewer reasons to build their own
packages, not more.
We keep the latest Ruby as not default because it tends to have more
bugs and gems lag, and the older version of Ruby is available because
some gems tend to lag really badly. So, users do have legitimate reasons
for using the non-default versions of Ruby. Also, upstream supports
latest and two versions back.
It wasn't until Ruby 2.6 was out that GitLab even supported 2.5, to give
just one example.
So, we have those versions of Ruby, and they should be usable, and that
includes installing gems via pkg.
There's the point that maybe we should only package gems that are needed
by other things, which I can understand, but don't know if I necessarily
agree with, because then you have users confused on what the "right" way
to install a gem is. "Oh, this one is packaged because something else in
ports needs it, so use the pkg, but this other one isn't packaged, so
you have to use gem."
And I'd think the same applies to python modules or perl modules, etc.
One could ask, why not provide flavors for all versions of python, that
is, 3.5, 3.6 and 3.7, along with the 2.7 ones as well, but to me that
doesn't seem quite necessary because the compatibility is better there,
as far as I can tell. But, I wouldn't be opposed to it personally, if
someone did make the argument in favor of it. Same with Perl and
especially things that depend on Java.
But that's all beside the point, really.
Steve
From owner-freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org Wed Sep 18 06:41:40 2019
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ruby@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1])
by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04446F3725
for <freebsd-ruby@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org>;
Wed, 18 Sep 2019 06:41:40 +0000 (UTC)
(envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3])
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46Y9PH6M2kz3Q6Q
for <freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org>; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 06:41:39 +0000 (UTC)
(envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org)
Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix)
id DA1ECF3720; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 06:41:39 +0000 (UTC)
Delivered-To: ruby@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1])
by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9E89F371E
for <ruby@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org>; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 06:41:39 +0000 (UTC)
(envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3])
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)
client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256)
(Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org",
Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK))
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46Y9PH5SW1z3Q6P
for <ruby@freebsd.org>; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 06:41:39 +0000 (UTC)
(envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (portscout.nyi.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:21])
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits))
(Client did not present a certificate)
by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9ED0A21112
for <ruby@freebsd.org>; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 06:41:39 +0000 (UTC)
(envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org)
Received: (from portscout@localhost)
by portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x8I6fdDT086686;
Wed, 18 Sep 2019 06:41:39 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org)
Message-Id: <201909180641.x8I6fdDT086686@portscout.nyi.freebsd.org>
X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.nyi.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to
portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/plain
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2019 06:41:39 +0000
From: portscout@FreeBSD.org
To: ruby@freebsd.org
Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date
X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: FreeBSD-specific Ruby discussions <freebsd-ruby.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ruby>,
<mailto:freebsd-ruby-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ruby/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ruby-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ruby>,
<mailto:freebsd-ruby-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2019 06:41:40 -0000
Dear port maintainer,
The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your
ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check
each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can
safely ignore the entry.
You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations
below.
Full details can be found at the following URL:
http://portscout.freebsd.org/ruby@freebsd.org.html
Port | Current version | New version
------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------
security/rubygem-doorkeeper | 5.0.2 | 5.2.1
------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------
If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page
for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of
distfiles on a per-port basis:
http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt
Thanks.
From owner-freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org Wed Sep 18 16:35:03 2019
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ruby@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1])
by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF11E122C01
for <freebsd-ruby@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org>;
Wed, 18 Sep 2019 16:35:03 +0000 (UTC)
(envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3])
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46YQYz5BM5z4Wrm
for <freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org>; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 16:35:03 +0000 (UTC)
(envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix)
id B0178122C00; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 16:35:03 +0000 (UTC)
Delivered-To: ruby@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1])
by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFDF9122BFF
for <ruby@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org>; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 16:35:03 +0000 (UTC)
(envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3])
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)
client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256)
(Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org",
Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK))
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46YQYz4DmVz4Wrl
for <ruby@FreeBSD.org>; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 16:35:03 +0000 (UTC)
(envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(Client did not present a certificate)
by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 74E9527B5A
for <ruby@FreeBSD.org>; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 16:35:03 +0000 (UTC)
(envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5])
by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x8IGZ3CW080588
for <ruby@FreeBSD.org>; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 16:35:03 GMT
(envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: (from www@localhost)
by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x8IGZ3Um080587
for ruby@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 16:35:03 GMT
(envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to
bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f
From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To: ruby@FreeBSD.org
Subject: [Bug 234005] www/redmine: Update to 4.0.1
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2019 16:35:02 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages
X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s)
X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-patch
X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People
X-Bugzilla-Who: alexander@polyvizor.com
X-Bugzilla-Status: Open
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: ---
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ruby@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback?
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-234005-21402-beIOCwD1nC@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-234005-21402@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-234005-21402@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: FreeBSD-specific Ruby discussions <freebsd-ruby.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ruby>,
<mailto:freebsd-ruby-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ruby/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ruby-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ruby>,
<mailto:freebsd-ruby-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2019 16:35:03 -0000
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D234005
Alexander Ushakov <alexander@polyvizor.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |alexander@polyvizor.com
--- Comment #7 from Alexander Ushakov <alexander@polyvizor.com> ---
Redmine already is 4.0.4 and it is a parallel brunch with 3.4 version. 4.0
brunch has support for rails5 and 3.4 - not. So it looks like that it is be=
tter
to separate redmine 4 to something like www/redmine4 port with rails5 in
dependencies
--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=
From owner-freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org Thu Sep 19 06:21:39 2019
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ruby@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1])
by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAFE0F797D
for <freebsd-ruby@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org>;
Thu, 19 Sep 2019 06:21:39 +0000 (UTC)
(envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3])
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46Ymvl5Zzfz4JZS
for <freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org>; Thu, 19 Sep 2019 06:21:39 +0000 (UTC)
(envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org)
Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix)
id BFA69F7978; Thu, 19 Sep 2019 06:21:39 +0000 (UTC)
Delivered-To: ruby@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1])
by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF717F7977
for <ruby@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org>; Thu, 19 Sep 2019 06:21:39 +0000 (UTC)
(envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3])
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)
client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256)
(Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org",
Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK))
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46Ymvl4VDkz4JZP
for <ruby@freebsd.org>; Thu, 19 Sep 2019 06:21:39 +0000 (UTC)
(envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (portscout.nyi.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:21])
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits))
(Client did not present a certificate)
by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F6A6934A
for <ruby@freebsd.org>; Thu, 19 Sep 2019 06:21:39 +0000 (UTC)
(envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org)
Received: (from portscout@localhost)
by portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x8J6LdMa003233;
Thu, 19 Sep 2019 06:21:39 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org)
Message-Id: <201909190621.x8J6LdMa003233@portscout.nyi.freebsd.org>
X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.nyi.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to
portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/plain
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2019 06:21:39 +0000
From: portscout@FreeBSD.org
To: ruby@freebsd.org
Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date
X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: FreeBSD-specific Ruby discussions <freebsd-ruby.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ruby>,
<mailto:freebsd-ruby-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ruby/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ruby-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ruby>,
<mailto:freebsd-ruby-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2019 06:21:39 -0000
Dear port maintainer,
The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your
ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check
each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can
safely ignore the entry.
You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations
below.
Full details can be found at the following URL:
http://portscout.freebsd.org/ruby@freebsd.org.html
Port | Current version | New version
------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------
www/rubygem-httparty | 0.16.4 | 0.17.1
------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------
www/rubygem-redis-rack | 2.0.5 | 2.0.6
------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------
If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page
for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of
distfiles on a per-port basis:
http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt
Thanks.
From owner-freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org Thu Sep 19 11:49:20 2019
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ruby@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1])
by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6DCCFF3AE
for <freebsd-ruby@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org>;
Thu, 19 Sep 2019 11:49:20 +0000 (UTC)
(envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3])
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46Yw9r5rL3z4byR
for <freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org>; Thu, 19 Sep 2019 11:49:20 +0000 (UTC)
(envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix)
id C6C7BFF3AD; Thu, 19 Sep 2019 11:49:20 +0000 (UTC)
Delivered-To: ruby@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1])
by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C68F3FF3AC
for <ruby@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org>; Thu, 19 Sep 2019 11:49:20 +0000 (UTC)
(envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3])
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)
client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256)
(Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org",
Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK))
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46Yw9r4qwLz4byQ
for <ruby@FreeBSD.org>; Thu, 19 Sep 2019 11:49:20 +0000 (UTC)
(envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(Client did not present a certificate)
by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A4E5CF79
for <ruby@FreeBSD.org>; Thu, 19 Sep 2019 11:49:20 +0000 (UTC)
(envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5])
by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x8JBnKXQ081574
for <ruby@FreeBSD.org>; Thu, 19 Sep 2019 11:49:20 GMT
(envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: (from www@localhost)
by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x8JBnKjb081573
for ruby@FreeBSD.org; Thu, 19 Sep 2019 11:49:20 GMT
(envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to
bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f
From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To: ruby@FreeBSD.org
Subject: [Bug 240558] devel/rubygem-rdoc doesn't build on ppc64 on
11.3-RELEASE-p3
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2019 11:49:20 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages
X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s)
X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me
X-Bugzilla-Who: luciano@vespaperitivo.it
X-Bugzilla-Status: New
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: ---
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ruby@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback?
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-240558-21402-guDE29zc84@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-240558-21402@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-240558-21402@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: FreeBSD-specific Ruby discussions <freebsd-ruby.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ruby>,
<mailto:freebsd-ruby-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ruby/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ruby-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ruby>,
<mailto:freebsd-ruby-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2019 11:49:21 -0000
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D240558
--- Comment #1 from Luciano Mannucci <luciano@vespaperitivo.it> ---
It seems that ruby26 is broken under PPC64. Vim disable IT for this
architecture.
Everything is fine with ruby25. Putting DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=3Druby=3D2.5 work=
s.
I think ruby26 should be marked as BROKEN while the fix is undergoing.
Luciano.
--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=