From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Sun Sep 29 09:55:47 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4266AFB330 for ; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 09:55:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46h1BC13X5z4Mc2 for ; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 09:55:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 24250FB32B; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 09:55:47 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: x11@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22DFCFB32A for ; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 09:55:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46h1BC0CQyz4Mc0 for ; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 09:55:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DAF8A18589 for ; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 09:55:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x8T9tk4J026213 for ; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 09:55:46 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x8T9tkic026212 for x11@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 09:55:46 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 240915] graphics/drm-current-kmod: SOURCE option prevents make installkernel from working Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2019 09:55:46 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: rakuco@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: x11@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version rep_platform op_sys bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter flagtypes.name Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2019 09:55:47 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D240915 Bug ID: 240915 Summary: graphics/drm-current-kmod: SOURCE option prevents make installkernel from working Product: Ports & Packages Version: Latest Hardware: Any OS: Any Status: New Severity: Affects Only Me Priority: --- Component: Individual Port(s) Assignee: x11@FreeBSD.org Reporter: rakuco@FreeBSD.org Flags: maintainer-feedback?(x11@FreeBSD.org) Assignee: x11@FreeBSD.org I have a machine that's currently on r349807, and I'm trying to update it to r352847. The build is done on a separate machine, and I use NFS to mount /usr/src and /usr/obj to complete the installation process. This machine I'm updating has the latest graphics/drm-current-kmod installed (4.16.g20190927). When I run `make installkernel', I get the following error: [...] =3D=3D=3D> zlib (install) install -T release -o root -g wheel -m 555 zlib.ko /boot/kernel/ install -T debug -o root -g wheel -m 555 zlib.ko.debug /usr/lib/debug/boot/kernel/ kldxref /boot/kernel =3D=3D=3D> drm-current-kmod (install) =3D=3D=3D> drm-current-kmod/linuxkpi (install) install -T release -o root -g wheel -m 555 linuxkpi_gplv2.ko /boot/kernel/ install: linuxkpi_gplv2.ko: No such file or directory *** Error code 71 Stop. make[4]: stopped in /usr/local/sys/modules/drm-current-kmod/linuxkpi *** Error code 1 Stop. make[3]: stopped in /usr/local/sys/modules/drm-current-kmod *** Error code 1 --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Sun Sep 29 09:55:47 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FAB5FB328 for ; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 09:55:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46h1BC00fgz4Mby for ; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 09:55:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id F1B46FB327; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 09:55:46 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: x11@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F058CFB325 for ; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 09:55:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46h1BB61ZSz4Mbx for ; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 09:55:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ADD9918588 for ; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 09:55:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x8T9tkZE026208 for ; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 09:55:46 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x8T9tk3K026207 for x11@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 09:55:46 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: maintainer-feedback requested: [Bug 240915] graphics/drm-current-kmod: SOURCE option prevents make installkernel from working Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2019 09:55:46 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Type: request X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: x11@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2019 09:55:47 -0000 Bugzilla Automation has asked freebsd-x11 mailing li= st for maintainer-feedback: Bug 240915: graphics/drm-current-kmod: SOURCE option prevents make installkernel from working https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D240915 --- Description --- I have a machine that's currently on r349807, and I'm trying to update it to r352847. The build is done on a separate machine, and I use NFS to mount /usr/src and /usr/obj to complete the installation process. This machine I'm updating has the latest graphics/drm-current-kmod installed (4.16.g20190927). When I run `make installkernel', I get the following error: [...] =3D=3D=3D> zlib (install) install -T release -o root -g wheel -m 555 zlib.ko /boot/kernel/ install -T debug -o root -g wheel -m 555 zlib.ko.debug /usr/lib/debug/boot/kernel/ kldxref /boot/kernel =3D=3D=3D> drm-current-kmod (install) =3D=3D=3D> drm-current-kmod/linuxkpi (install) install -T release -o root -g wheel -m 555 linuxkpi_gplv2.ko /boot/kernel/ install: linuxkpi_gplv2.ko: No such file or directory *** Error code 71 Stop. make[4]: stopped in /usr/local/sys/modules/drm-current-kmod/linuxkpi *** Error code 1 Stop. make[3]: stopped in /usr/local/sys/modules/drm-current-kmod *** Error code 1 From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Sun Sep 29 16:52:05 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A1F9124E14 for ; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 16:52:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46hBQY3f7Tz3Dcc for ; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 16:52:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 7D19B124E12; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 16:52:05 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: x11@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CE09124E11 for ; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 16:52:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46hBQY2pnxz3Dcb for ; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 16:52:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44B641D127 for ; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 16:52:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x8TGq5bo003609 for ; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 16:52:05 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x8TGq5lb003608 for x11@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 16:52:05 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 240801] Upgrade x11/libXvMC to 1.0.12 Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2019 16:52:05 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: pete@nomadlogic.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: x11@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2019 16:52:05 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D240801 --- Comment #8 from pete@nomadlogic.org --- (In reply to Niclas Zeising from comment #7) Should have read Changelog earlier: "commit 0fab90b409a3e4848603bdb6b438523038239f23 Author: Adam Jackson Date: Tue Sep 24 12:28:19 2019 -0400 vld: Provide ourself This header refers to libX11 types, it doesn't belong in xorgproto and has been moved to legacy in 2019.2. Supply it ourselves." Of course there is no 2019.2 tag yet for xorgproto, so i think the best thi= ng to do is put this PR on hold until xorgproto-2019.2 is released, then things should build cleanly. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Sun Sep 29 17:03:52 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 829CE125280 for ; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 17:03:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46hBh82vGPz3FKC for ; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 17:03:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 61AAE12527F; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 17:03:52 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: x11@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6170512527E for ; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 17:03:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46hBh820dnz3FKB for ; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 17:03:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 27C711D337 for ; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 17:03:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x8TH3qiN034913 for ; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 17:03:52 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x8TH3qZ8034912 for x11@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 17:03:52 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 240801] Upgrade x11/libXvMC to 1.0.12 Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2019 17:03:52 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: zeising@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: x11@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2019 17:03:52 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D240801 --- Comment #9 from Niclas Zeising --- Yeah, I know the background for the move, but there is some time before xorgproto can be fixed, and moving this header might surprise some ports. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Sun Sep 29 21:00:29 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA9AB12A46E for ; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 21:00:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46hHx94Rd8z3y8N for ; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 21:00:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 7339F12A462; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 21:00:29 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: x11@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72EBF12A461 for ; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 21:00:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46hHx91dNGz3y88 for ; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 21:00:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 188C21FDEA for ; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 21:00:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x8TL0Skh025832 for ; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 21:00:28 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from bugzilla@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x8TL0S8U025831 for x11@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 21:00:28 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201909292100.x8TL0S8U025831@kenobi.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: bugzilla set sender to bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org To: x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: Problem reports for x11@FreeBSD.org that need special attention Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2019 21:00:28 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2019 21:00:30 -0000 To view an individual PR, use: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=(Bug Id). The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users, which need special attention. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and obsolete releases. Status | Bug Id | Description ------------+-----------+--------------------------------------------------- New | 236003 | x11-drivers/xf86-video-intel: update to 2019-07-1 Open | 220444 | x11-servers/xorg-server crashes on attempt to pla Open | 233652 | lang/beignet: Set DEPRECATED Open | 233740 | x11/pixman: LLD relocation errors on armv7 Open | 240153 | x11/libinput: Update to 1.14.1 New | 236003 | x11-drivers/xf86-video-intel: update to 2019-07-1 Open | 223014 | graphics/mesa-dri: enable NEON and AltiVec Open | 240153 | x11/libinput: Update to 1.14.1 New | 231694 | graphics/mesa-dri: uninstall error with portupgra 9 problems total for which you should take action. From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Mon Sep 30 06:37:54 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5348FD09C for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 06:37:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46hXlQ4j9cz4T3s for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 06:37:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id A1762FD09A; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 06:37:54 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: x11@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A13C9FD099 for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 06:37:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46hXlQ3f0lz4T3m for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 06:37:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (portscout.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 59825266B2 for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 06:37:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x8U6bsfw082414; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 06:37:54 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201909300637.x8U6bsfw082414@portscout.nyi.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.nyi.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2019 06:37:54 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: x11@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2019 06:37:54 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/x11@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ graphics/freeglut | 3.0.0 | 3.2.1 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Reported by: portscout! From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Mon Sep 30 10:30:21 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 748AD1234C4 for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 10:30:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from salvadore@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46hdvd2Tmbz4gGX for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 10:30:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from salvadore@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 4C4891234BD; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 10:30:21 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: x11@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C0C01234BC for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 10:30:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from salvadore@FreeBSD.org) Received: from MailHost (unknown [80.211.33.142]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46hdvc5JqXz4gFp for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 10:30:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from salvadore@FreeBSD.org) Received: from root (uid 0) (envelope-from salvadore@FreeBSD.org) id 26218 by MailHost (DragonFly Mail Agent v0.11+); Mon, 30 Sep 2019 12:25:12 +0200 To: x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: Call for 2019Q3 quarterly status reports Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2019 12:25:12 +0200 Message-Id: <5d91d808.26218.19a93fdb@MailHost> From: X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46hdvc5JqXz4gFp X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.99 / 15.00]; local_wl_from(0.00)[FreeBSD.org]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.99)[-0.988,0]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; ASN(0.00)[asn:31034, ipnet:80.211.0.0/17, country:IT] X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2019 10:30:21 -0000 Dear FreeBSD Community, The deadline for the next FreeBSD Quarterly Status update is October 31, 2019, for work done since the last round of Quarterly Reports: July, 2019 – September, 2019. Status report submissions do not need to be very long. They may be about anything happening in the FreeBSD project and community, and provide a great way to inform FreeBSD users and developers about work that is underway or has been completed. Report submissions are not limited to committers; anyone doing anything interesting and FreeBSD related can -- and should -- write one! The preferred method is to follow the guidelines at the Quarterly GitHub repository: https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd-quarterly Alternatively you can fetch the Markdown template, fill it in, and email it to quar...@FreeBSD.org. The template can be found at: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/freebsd/freebsd-quarterly/master/report-sample.md The old XML generator and templates are no longer used. We look forward to seeing your 2019Q3 reports! Thanks, Lorenzo Salvadore (on behalf of quarterly@) From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Mon Sep 30 11:46:50 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA2F912541A for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 11:46:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46hgbt40Mdz3JLs for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 11:46:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 871B2125419; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 11:46:50 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: x11@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85B1C125418 for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 11:46:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46hgbt20VRz3JLr for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 11:46:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 23FD02026 for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 11:46:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x8UBkoPq083359 for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 11:46:50 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x8UBko8l083358 for x11@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 11:46:50 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 236003] x11-drivers/xf86-video-intel: update to 2019-07-10 snapshot and refactor Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2019 11:46:49 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: patch, patch-ready X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: jbeich@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: x11@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? merge-quarterly? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: flagtypes.name attachments.isobsolete attachments.created Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2019 11:46:50 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D236003 Jan Beich changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #207727|maintainer-approval?(x11@Fr | Flags|eeBSD.org) | Attachment #207727|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #14 from Jan Beich --- Created attachment 207959 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D207959&action= =3Dedit v5 Upstream warning fixes. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Mon Sep 30 17:10:21 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 163FE12CEB6 for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 17:10:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46hpn86mWJz4BZ0 for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 17:10:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id E1FE412CEB1; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 17:10:20 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: x11@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFC8812CEAE for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 17:10:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46hpn84tnKz4BYy for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 17:10:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 85A255D36 for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 17:10:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x8UHAKQJ003870 for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 17:10:20 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x8UHAKTA003869 for x11@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 17:10:20 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 240801] Upgrade x11/libXvMC to 1.0.12 Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2019 17:10:20 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: pete@nomadlogic.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: x11@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2019 17:10:21 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D240801 --- Comment #10 from pete@nomadlogic.org --- (In reply to Niclas Zeising from comment #9) Looking at the diffs for this release, it seems the only change is to move = this header into libXvMC, so I suggest we put this on hold until xorgproto is released, and then come up with a plan to get dependent ports updated as we= ll. https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xorg/lib/libxvmc/commits/libXvMC-1.0.12 --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Mon Sep 30 19:24:54 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8681F1302AC for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 19:24:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46hsmQ35qMz4L6y for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 19:24:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 683171302AA; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 19:24:54 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: x11@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67FB81302A9 for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 19:24:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46hsmQ26f8z4L6x for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 19:24:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D3E576EC for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 19:24:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x8UJOsEE071225 for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 19:24:54 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x8UJOsNC071224 for x11@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 19:24:54 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 240801] Upgrade x11/libXvMC to 1.0.12 Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2019 19:24:54 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: zeising@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: x11@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2019 19:24:54 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D240801 --- Comment #11 from Niclas Zeising --- (In reply to pete from comment #10) Agree --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Tue Oct 1 06:19:34 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77525F83D4 for ; Tue, 1 Oct 2019 06:19:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46j8Hp1thVz4Rf3 for ; Tue, 1 Oct 2019 06:19:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 39ADFF83C8; Tue, 1 Oct 2019 06:19:34 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: x11@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39603F83C6 for ; Tue, 1 Oct 2019 06:19:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46j8Hn6LvFz4Rf1 for ; Tue, 1 Oct 2019 06:19:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B6F42F33C for ; Tue, 1 Oct 2019 06:19:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x916JXRh087384 for ; Tue, 1 Oct 2019 06:19:33 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x916JXlC087373 for x11@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 1 Oct 2019 06:19:33 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 236003] x11-drivers/xf86-video-intel: update to 2019-07-10 snapshot and refactor Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2019 06:19:32 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: patch, patch-ready X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: jbeich@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: x11@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? merge-quarterly? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: attachments.description Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2019 06:19:34 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D236003 Jan Beich changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #207959|v5 |v5 (has commit message) description| | --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Tue Oct 1 16:36:37 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C39513A385 for ; Tue, 1 Oct 2019 16:36:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46jPzm6TXGz43Vl for ; Tue, 1 Oct 2019 16:36:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id DE63A13A377; Tue, 1 Oct 2019 16:36:36 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: x11@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE2AF13A376 for ; Tue, 1 Oct 2019 16:36:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46jPzm5S4Vz43Vg for ; Tue, 1 Oct 2019 16:36:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A00CF1E22E for ; Tue, 1 Oct 2019 16:36:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x91GaaXx044558 for ; Tue, 1 Oct 2019 16:36:36 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x91Gaa8I044557 for x11@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 1 Oct 2019 16:36:36 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 239682] Default to devel/llvm90 when libLLVM/libclang are required or if /usr/bin/clang is not enough Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2019 16:36:34 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-qa X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: brooks@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jbeich@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback+ X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2019 16:36:37 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D239682 --- Comment #22 from Brooks Davis --- I'm unhappy that this went in without giving devel/llvm90 some time to sett= le after the release. Worse it was committed during a conference and I had vacation and international flights scheduled in the 10 days after this so I= 'm still cleaning up lose ends. As a matter of good practice, I'd prefer to w= eek at least two weeks delay between the commit of the release version and a LLVM_DEFAULT update. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Wed Oct 2 18:21:31 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65D29135D16 for ; Wed, 2 Oct 2019 18:21:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jsm@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::24b:4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46k4GM270lz3KBP for ; Wed, 2 Oct 2019 18:21:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jsm@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freebsd2.freebsd.lan (mail.northatlanticmusicsupplies.com [90.185.194.38]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: jsm) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E8913D26D for ; Wed, 2 Oct 2019 18:21:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jsm@FreeBSD.org) To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org From: Jesper Schmitz Mouridsen Subject: Xwayland under sway invisible running x11 apps. Message-ID: <018ae261-fe05-b8a3-13e8-1e96177025e8@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2019 20:21:26 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2019 18:21:31 -0000 Hi Running sway, which starts XWayland enables me to start X11 apps.. I can see the apps runinng with xwininfo. However X11 apps are not rendered visible on the monitor. I'm still on ivybridge so perhaps my HW is simply to old, for being tested during development? Any tips, besides avoiding wayland ;-) Would buying a radeon pci-e graphics card help? (non-rootless XWayland segfaults, so i cannot test with that for now) Regards Jsm From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Wed Oct 2 19:36:16 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8ECD3137AC3 for ; Wed, 2 Oct 2019 19:36:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jbeich@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:6074::16:84]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46k5wc3Grgz3Q4Q; Wed, 2 Oct 2019 19:36:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jbeich@freebsd.org) Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1354) id 4F07F500F; Wed, 2 Oct 2019 19:36:16 +0000 (UTC) From: Jan Beich To: Jesper Schmitz Mouridsen Cc: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Xwayland under sway invisible running x11 apps. References: <018ae261-fe05-b8a3-13e8-1e96177025e8@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2019 21:36:14 +0200 In-Reply-To: <018ae261-fe05-b8a3-13e8-1e96177025e8@FreeBSD.org> (Jesper Schmitz Mouridsen's message of "Wed, 2 Oct 2019 20:21:26 +0200") Message-ID: <5zl7-kki9-wny@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2019 19:36:16 -0000 Jesper Schmitz Mouridsen writes: > Hi > > Running sway, which starts XWayland enables me to start X11 apps.. > > I can see the apps runinng with xwininfo. > > However X11 apps are not rendered visible on the monitor. Does forcing DRI3 via "export LIBGL_DRI3_ENABLE=1" or building graphics/mesa-{libs,dri} with CFLAGS+=-D__DRM_NEXT__ help? Xwayland needs DRI3 but FreeBSD disables it as a kludge for drm-legacy-kmod: graphics/mesa-dri/files/patch-src_glx_glxext.c graphics/mesa-dri/files/patch-src_egl_drivers_dri2_platform__x11.c From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Wed Oct 2 21:19:15 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF6D31397BC for ; Wed, 2 Oct 2019 21:19:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jsm@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::24b:4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46k8CR4cb9z41rX; Wed, 2 Oct 2019 21:19:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jsm@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freebsd2.freebsd.lan (mail.northatlanticmusicsupplies.com [90.185.194.38]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: jsm) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3340FE726; Wed, 2 Oct 2019 21:19:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jsm@FreeBSD.org) Subject: Re: Xwayland under sway invisible running x11 apps. To: Jan Beich Cc: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org References: <018ae261-fe05-b8a3-13e8-1e96177025e8@FreeBSD.org> <5zl7-kki9-wny@FreeBSD.org> From: Jesper Schmitz Mouridsen Message-ID: Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2019 23:18:54 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <5zl7-kki9-wny@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2019 21:19:15 -0000 On 02.10.2019 21.36, Jan Beich wrote: > Jesper Schmitz Mouridsen writes: > >> Hi >> >> Running sway, which starts XWayland enables me to start X11 apps.. >> >> I can see the apps runinng with xwininfo. >> >> However X11 apps are not rendered visible on the monitor. > Does forcing DRI3 via "export LIBGL_DRI3_ENABLE=1" or building > graphics/mesa-{libs,dri} with CFLAGS+=-D__DRM_NEXT__ help? > > Xwayland needs DRI3 but FreeBSD disables it as a kludge for drm-legacy-kmod: > graphics/mesa-dri/files/patch-src_glx_glxext.c > graphics/mesa-dri/files/patch-src_egl_drivers_dri2_platform__x11.c Thanks for the hints, reinstalling  mesa-{libs,dri} from ports did the trick..X11-apps are now visible I did not need to set -D__DRM_NEXT__ though, so I don't what was wrong.. I've drm-fbsd12.0-kmod-4.16.g20190814 installed. Regards jsm From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Wed Oct 2 21:38:44 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 719DC139DF5 for ; Wed, 2 Oct 2019 21:38:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from johalun0@gmail.com) Received: from mail-oi1-x244.google.com (mail-oi1-x244.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::244]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46k8dw2Pj8z42vd; Wed, 2 Oct 2019 21:38:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from johalun0@gmail.com) Received: by mail-oi1-x244.google.com with SMTP id i185so699027oif.9; Wed, 02 Oct 2019 14:38:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=3jgFyS4jrgz7qgNPnc2B13NJ39UO9zVkbvsESzpREPk=; b=H61M4WmADITr/koeU7+h1DNf5cNdOnyh8EPRnV5vtF47Ynn+5jhJ43CeHtXH1E3b1r VnL/rrUgokfdi2CoBSLNqPjnQD0gLT77gBexJdWUF5OJLLyU6Ac3YnTvg1uIbBvURG+f tPhAcRJ3nOQCqCRfDmPm9pmutz6ti6a21pS3Pj6RL5k4f+YvWYvZIZ6gqGIVAhevkiPg nXBllGfDlExXxYFuZEhPD2jpTSX5bkcJNmMkv70x/c5T/+6v2N4dnZGtUYsmZUIgOm+I AWfMZ7EACm0DlYj/h6UinUf/jha+p8o8xeVJcf98j8OUXO2EgBLMRHguTRzRJCa46NlE D8Uw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=3jgFyS4jrgz7qgNPnc2B13NJ39UO9zVkbvsESzpREPk=; b=IeRGh5ACini9zeVye/ALB0asHUiW7/bhbYt7HHOoDTCuha4CCGfT6eacc5aSI6Eehv EGereZjhXkucET1EbQJT49QTgflS80W/YKLcsk9oEG5xmQd9v6NnPpr3fXddP/TGeaTq syxc+VlnhFpVetwGDEReCFhvUoBJ7LUnFUxGFypSI07fJMUuIDEpdhjfA+6BsN7wsdTb vs6Ts2Q8MinjKpueV0op2yD2YxiJz2MRM72CHbAQsJWpZOkJUePLexjoqPmUbRbyYTn4 23dLa9Tqi/hRiXopSQ1fEgqZKUg4nLVBjsEU/M1XZNMcUJQJvvWo8+XPlcnsBwp9gg4M xxRg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXZKGOWMqbm71isrcIE5Hl36iFl8ouVIkX8cbyh/3VrJNRqd0sO HTT6EQGfMLlGbWJst7Y5N6hOPO9Ftmc/pwXsiYfrkA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyeEAFLyVmsqXweiZsX7Su8GsfLNMeBFzhR/66YKdMj2n7whA7NZMemXpTNU3+JZdtEr96xfrSx62m3cDMHM4A= X-Received: by 2002:a54:4f8f:: with SMTP id g15mr172973oiy.62.1570052322278; Wed, 02 Oct 2019 14:38:42 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <018ae261-fe05-b8a3-13e8-1e96177025e8@FreeBSD.org> <5zl7-kki9-wny@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: From: Johannes Lundberg Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2019 14:38:31 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Xwayland under sway invisible running x11 apps. To: Jesper Schmitz Mouridsen Cc: Jan Beich , freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46k8dw2Pj8z42vd X-Spamd-Bar: ----- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-6.00 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.999,0]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; REPLY(-4.00)[] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2019 21:38:44 -0000 This should work without patches once we are on xorg 1.20. Hopefully that= =E2=80=99s not too far away. On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 14:19 Jesper Schmitz Mouridsen wrote: > > On 02.10.2019 21.36, Jan Beich wrote: > > Jesper Schmitz Mouridsen writes: > > > >> Hi > >> > >> Running sway, which starts XWayland enables me to start X11 apps.. > >> > >> I can see the apps runinng with xwininfo. > >> > >> However X11 apps are not rendered visible on the monitor. > > Does forcing DRI3 via "export LIBGL_DRI3_ENABLE=3D1" or building > > graphics/mesa-{libs,dri} with CFLAGS+=3D-D__DRM_NEXT__ help? > > > > Xwayland needs DRI3 but FreeBSD disables it as a kludge for > drm-legacy-kmod: > > graphics/mesa-dri/files/patch-src_glx_glxext.c > > graphics/mesa-dri/files/patch-src_egl_drivers_dri2_platform__x11.c > > Thanks for the hints, reinstalling mesa-{libs,dri} from ports did the > trick..X11-apps are now visible > > I did not need to set -D__DRM_NEXT__ though, so I don't what was wrong.. > > I've drm-fbsd12.0-kmod-4.16.g20190814 installed. > > Regards > > jsm > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-x11@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-x11 > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-x11-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Thu Oct 3 06:32:42 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA4F6129F34 for ; Thu, 3 Oct 2019 06:32:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mineetakriyat1998@hotmail.com) Received: from EUR01-VE1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-oln040092066024.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.92.66.24]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.protection.outlook.com", Issuer "GlobalSign Organization Validation CA - SHA256 - G3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46kNV144b8z4gJ9 for ; Thu, 3 Oct 2019 06:32:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mineetakriyat1998@hotmail.com) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=OIHv4b77/CjhcmcqRX4jqgjYlWCLkhQfZVgkVMo9yU3GHly2J49GoNrCm1WtS4sFYto7l0frxZLIhgjj7ZXZlwAKocNrSqcNe60254yoUguvBOCBtpqkIU91QR+7nkSOZLoHrinLBXd32mGdknp0HyPp44eJUKXJnjDtPEdi+6MEUT7NHsiay7M7/TEHzGwmOVjG1IPFKrqQsvhlsqFvfT1VyW8LMgbcT4rQPoATxixZLHf51TrHU4RafPfEpQlBBodgac8OxBKfSiFHAFqicxffa8/D2/elFleEaVFcNb6Jzkic0wYrI1MySE9wx8FsntAnhMDxEwWaY9OWE+5WYQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=UJOKV603eQD2fNKYAC1nuFu072I3cGLeDVfpstBy7xw=; b=Gm/3zRnAEi9ivF5W2epVMuz8M+LqnW+NcW3EvrisDBYfBX4eQn+4GfOxZIeQ2cbWC0KCMFv7m+hSqI2LE7y7VusjxMkJkrJy5LHkpPS9ayVDoJA0+qyfaHYNqQMTl77jMzyK+dgodeBdhquoGK3gQqN6/q0quymzs3MW8gZqTzod6LcPLa2K39NmBvrsbJcU+WJ6KkELrfdKoit/pQa5fnnO2ASgnU1Y2zYADgoaOWUHw+SvBCRadsQqHu2lI2dH91LErH1a25DN9H8rGwYZhWaQytSR2vwjxL9LdKROdwwHAA88mw+Pv9BJJu1BBEmBs0eot+58ABEPhPrO27JI5w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=none; dmarc=none; dkim=none; arc=none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hotmail.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=UJOKV603eQD2fNKYAC1nuFu072I3cGLeDVfpstBy7xw=; b=j+kItO6/gCDrBhKMKKPzRArnku2i3goIL8SbjRSlmFv8eLHBhWcaUHE36FNhwqUoCofrtVZrPpPTseQaWv+o7+G8zCo9Wk+MjnUDr+c87uts5h0sa4t2l5RRmu8+s69IsZxIQw1cMqAglATNpQddcLCD6yHE0yiDILrwTLs4P40qkYGtQX1MFKES+ZoZGmSDzkSAgR9tpdlbftGUYITqWF3BHP78R10whm//WZda2hE+9XzTeaCcf0D6rCdQUPC8U+xFlgnudFlY5mzsQS0azo7c3C5LtKzPj9PkiIjqoLaQJBCPFPrFOhU/iUdm4mupb2phXF7GOY7BhXrDvDW6gQ== Received: from HE1EUR01FT015.eop-EUR01.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.0.54) by HE1EUR01HT037.eop-EUR01.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.0.240) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384) id 15.20.2327.20; Thu, 3 Oct 2019 06:32:39 +0000 Received: from AM6PR07MB4884.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (10.152.0.53) by HE1EUR01FT015.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.0.154) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384) id 15.20.2327.20 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 3 Oct 2019 06:32:39 +0000 Received: from AM6PR07MB4884.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::90d0:139c:eb20:dd5a]) by AM6PR07MB4884.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::90d0:139c:eb20:dd5a%3]) with mapi id 15.20.2327.021; Thu, 3 Oct 2019 06:32:39 +0000 From: Mineeta Riyat To: "freebsd-x11@freebsd.org" Subject: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Thread-Topic: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Thread-Index: AQHVebPu30zLIcDAvE6lKHXDzIx1Xg== Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2019 06:29:38 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-clientproxiedby: BN6PR2001CA0015.namprd20.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:404:b4::25) To AM6PR07MB4884.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:20b:34::28) x-incomingtopheadermarker: OriginalChecksum:E26E58E8370395233BDBFB5AD0FC2F296C6551A54B06924C53F3196409DB9EC3; UpperCasedChecksum:A9830524BD080DAFA83CF0F658786FE12719574157BB5EAD774B7475CA389F6B; SizeAsReceived:7391; Count:48 x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1 x-tmn: [Z21/W1vgz+8i5eArfvR/TVvKpcFtV8X4] x-ms-publictraffictype: Email x-incomingheadercount: 48 x-eopattributedmessage: 0 x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: HE1EUR01HT037: x-ms-exchange-purlcount: 1 x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: tS9jiYyLEhjWDc2tGL3sJgefPdZpp81pshpOY+nJ6xBlELybLscMJfROnmMlaejpj/t7wOwkQ8+R+JFTDhQCzJ9GrqGxNqptLlWfhnhr74dyTTM0JLAHcOTgygGxFrngTjwDknM8qVtR55OQtQw0mY5rsM0uis4M2iAlwCZRumdgfOGnYpz6z1IkP8PiLkQ6H/2DiPExxhrs4UGvvg4ZOo4LOS3jIKs4K7hbe2RGZTSLclOJw8cmyqeffgZv9dB9UNSoL/j18FS4XJHug3FyKy4vh8Z049dpatJokQqS89o3q+HvdwhgCDfpc3FZG1Qu8jazbNzSacER16CkiFA7bfRXz5HBMKnbWPV3o3gsDQD0vpJkwJkRthGQMGOWrp5D x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: hotmail.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-RMS-PersistedConsumerOrg: 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 6b91e945-7589-4dbb-4063-08d747cb10e0 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-rms-persistedconsumerorg: 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 03 Oct 2019 06:29:38.5008 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Internet X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: HE1EUR01HT037 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46kNV144b8z4gJ9 X-Spamd-Bar: ++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=hotmail.com header.s=selector1 header.b=j+kItO6/; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=hotmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of mineetakriyat1998@hotmail.com designates 40.92.66.24 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=mineetakriyat1998@hotmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [2.75 / 15.00]; SEM_URIBL_FRESH15(3.00)[mobileinboxrjgp.host.fresh15.spameatingmonkey.net]; R_SPF_ALLOW(0.00)[+ip4:40.92.0.0/15]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[hotmail.com]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[hotmail.com:+]; MIME_BASE64_TEXT(0.10)[]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(0.00)[hotmail.com,none]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[hotmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:8075, ipnet:40.64.0.0/10, country:US]; ARC_ALLOW(0.00)[i=1]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[hotmail.com.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.996,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(0.00)[hotmail.com:s=selector1]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; IP_SCORE(0.00)[ipnet: 40.64.0.0/10(-3.84), asn: 8075(-2.56), country: US(-0.05)]; IP_SCORE_FREEMAIL(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; BAD_REP_POLICIES(0.10)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.64)[0.642,0]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[24.66.92.40.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.3.0]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_ALL(0.00)[] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2019 06:32:42 -0000 4oiZ4oiZ4oiZDQoNCk5vdGlmaWNhdGlvbiByZWNlaXZlZCBPcGVuIG5vdGlmaWNhdGlvbi48aHR0 cDovLzI1Ni1yZWFkLW5vdy5tb2JpbGVpbmJveHJqZ3AuaG9zdC9seWNlYS9hbmF0b3hpbi5waHA/ Y3J5cHRvZGlyYT1kb3JuaWNrcy05ZDhmMTU2ZmJmOWM5ZWYxMmFhNjkxYjAyMjJhZTQzOD4NCg0K From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Fri Oct 4 05:57:17 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BC6CFCC08 for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 05:57:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46kzfj1psZz41Hh for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 05:57:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 3C560FCC06; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 05:57:17 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: x11@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C196FCC05 for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 05:57:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46kzfj0x5Mz41Hg for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 05:57:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 039B31FE62 for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 05:57:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x945vGpJ051590 for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 05:57:16 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x945vG5n051589 for x11@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 05:57:16 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 239682] Default to devel/llvm90 when libLLVM/libclang are required or if /usr/bin/clang is not enough Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2019 05:57:16 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-qa X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: jbeich@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jbeich@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback+ X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2019 05:57:17 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D239682 --- Comment #23 from Jan Beich --- (In reply to Brooks Davis from comment #22) That's unfortunate. I've expected you to prepare before release. Even after excluding time for EuroBSDCon 2019 + time for travel there was roughly 1 mo= nth available. Regressions won't magically disappear unless reported, be found unless users start dogfooding, and users won't dogfood before LLVM_DEFAULT switch. What you're proposing is not a good practice but an exception for 1 maintai= ner. And the result would be loss of motivation to prepare before release for me= and maybe other maintainers i.e., ~1 month before reduced to 2 weeks after. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Fri Oct 4 13:16:09 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A454612E562 for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 13:16:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46l9P53r9Wz4MZn for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 13:16:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 83AD912E561; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 13:16:09 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: x11@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8366912E560 for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 13:16:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46l9P52gnzz4MZd for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 13:16:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F5BD24CA4 for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 13:16:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x94DG9GS073645 for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 13:16:09 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x94DG9J2073644 for x11@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 13:16:09 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 239682] Default to devel/llvm90 when libLLVM/libclang are required or if /usr/bin/clang is not enough Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2019 13:16:06 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-qa X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: imp@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jbeich@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback+ X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2019 13:16:09 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D239682 Warner Losh changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |imp@FreeBSD.org --- Comment #24 from Warner Losh --- (In reply to Jan Beich from comment #23) when the llvm developers tell you it isn't ready, it isn't ready. When the graphics folks tell you it isn't ready, it isn't ready. If it's not ready, timing doesn't matter. Please start listening to your pe= ers. Bland assertions that we need to do this, or that a week is enough time are flat out wrong. This really needs to be backed out and you need to adopt a = more conservative approach to pushing things in. You are literally making a lot = of people very mad at you for not listening to them. There's a lot of smart pe= ople in the project, and when they are mad at you for how you've done something,= it pays to listen. They are almost certainly right. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Fri Oct 4 15:55:08 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81CCC131BD0 for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 15:55:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46lDwX2DNhz4VwF for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 15:55:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 4C6BA131BCF; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 15:55:08 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: x11@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C2FF131BCE for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 15:55:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46lDwX1MY4z4VwC for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 15:55:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 12D7A268BE for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 15:55:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x94Ft7Ow007560 for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 15:55:07 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x94Ft7js007557 for x11@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 15:55:07 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 239682] Default to devel/llvm90 when libLLVM/libclang are required or if /usr/bin/clang is not enough Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2019 15:55:05 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-qa X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: jbeich@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jbeich@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback+ X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2019 15:55:08 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D239682 --- Comment #25 from Jan Beich --- (In reply to Warner Losh from comment #24) > when the llvm developers tell you it isn't ready, it isn't ready. Release happens when "the llvm developers" decide something "is ready" for = wide consumption. > When the graphics folks tell you it isn't ready, it isn't ready. Before you've started with FUD they were silent for the whole duration. x11@ was in CC as requested in Mk/bsd.default-versions.mk. > If it's not ready, timing doesn't matter. Please start listening to your = peers. Assignee decides when patch "is ready" to land. At the time there were no blockers and maintainer timeout was reached. After landing all regressions = were promptly fixed. I don't think I've made any mistakes. > Bland assertions that we need to do this, Assignee decides what work and how it's done. There were several issues (confusion and blind spots) but it's a net positive. I'll try to do better = in future. > or that a week is enough time are flat out wrong. 2019-09-20 (landing) - 2019-08-06 (review request) =3D 45 days. > This really needs to be backed out Why? I need a technical rationale. > and you need to adopt a more conservative approach to pushing things in. Provide more details, including how to treat bad actors. My approach works = fine elsewhere i.e., wherever the graphics team is not involved. > You are literally making a lot of people very mad at you for not > listening to them. I'm awaiting brooks@ reply to shed light on what led to planning/prioritiza= tion failure. Otherwise, it looks like a one-off misunderstanding. > There's a lot of smart people in the project, and when they are mad > at you for how you've done something, it pays to listen. They are > almost certainly right. I do listen but don't blindly follow unless requested by the authority in charge. "Smart people" is ambiguous term, those who excel at coding may not= be good at negotiating. Obviously, you have a lot more such experience but the current attitude falls short. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Fri Oct 4 15:58:55 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47AEE131CA0 for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 15:58:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46lF0v1C9mz4W1J for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 15:58:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 293ED131C9F; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 15:58:55 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: x11@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2903E131C9E for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 15:58:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46lF0v0JxDz4W1H for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 15:58:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E3BBF268CF for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 15:58:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x94FwsgB011936 for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 15:58:54 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x94Fwsa5011935 for x11@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 15:58:54 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 239682] Default to devel/llvm90 when libLLVM/libclang are required or if /usr/bin/clang is not enough Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2019 15:58:53 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-qa X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: imp@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jbeich@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback+ X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2019 15:58:55 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D239682 --- Comment #26 from Warner Losh --- YOU BROKE GNOME AND HAVEN'T FIXED IT. All that other stuff is smoke and mirrors that ignores the fact this dump a= big turd into the FreeBDS pkg pool and you aren't taking responsibility for your actions. Stop deflecting and fix this. You think you are right, but you are wrong an= d if you don't step up to the responsibility of having a commit bit there will be consequences. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Fri Oct 4 16:09:34 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83050131F5E for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 16:09:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46lFFB30M6z4WQ2 for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 16:09:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 66D93131F57; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 16:09:34 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: x11@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66A52131F56 for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 16:09:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46lFFB20Bbz4WQ0 for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 16:09:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 289D726AC0 for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 16:09:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x94G9YKI037101 for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 16:09:34 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x94G9YT8037100 for x11@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 16:09:34 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 239682] Default to devel/llvm90 when libLLVM/libclang are required or if /usr/bin/clang is not enough Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2019 16:09:32 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-qa X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: imp@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jbeich@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback+ X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2019 16:09:34 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D239682 --- Comment #27 from Warner Losh --- (In reply to Jan Beich from comment #25) >(In reply to Warner Losh from comment #24) >> when the llvm developers tell you it isn't ready, it isn't ready. >Release happens when "the llvm developers" decide something "is ready" for= wide >consumption. No, FreeBSD decides when llvm is ready for FreeBSD. >> When the graphics folks tell you it isn't ready, it isn't ready. >Before you've started with FUD they were silent for the whole duration. x1= 1@ was in CC >as requested in Mk/bsd.default-versions.mk. It broke gnome. It broke other things. People don't always have time to try things here. >> If it's not ready, timing doesn't matter. Please start listening to your= peers. >Assignee decides when patch "is ready" to land. At the time there were no = blockers and >maintainer timeout was reached. After landing all regressions= were promptly fixed. I >don't think I've made any mistakes. I think you have. I can't use gnome. I had to waste half a day to trouble s= hoot it and switch over to LXDE. >> Bland assertions that we need to do this, >Assignee decides what work and how it's done. There were several issues (c= onfusion and >blind spots) but it's a net positive. I'll try to do better i= n future. Right. You didn't wait for the people in the project who spent lots of time maintaining things to reply. In the past, we've not done big compiler bumps= on a 'timeout' basis. You didn't get a positive affirmation from Brooks, for example. That's not cool. Even if there's technically a timeout rule, you h= ave to use some common sense around this and not do it on a 'timeout' basis. >> or that a week is enough time are flat out wrong. >2019-09-20 (landing) - 2019-08-06 (review request) =3D 45 days. It was a week before the branch. And we knew *RIGHT*AWAY* things were broke= n. And 9.0 hasn't been out for 45 days, so this is *BOGUS*. >> This really needs to be backed out >Why? I need a technical rationale. You broke stuff. It's really that simple. >> and you need to adopt a more conservative approach to pushing things in. >Provide more details, including how to treat bad actors. My approach works= fine >elsewhere i.e., wherever the graphics team is not involved. Brooks isn't on the graphics team. People do not like your bull in a chinas= hop approach. You have ignored the feedback and now claim it's OK except for the graphics people? No, I don't buy it. And even so, if the graphics people are complaining, it's on *YOU* to fix it. You are literally the only person I've had to have more than a single conversation with due to problems created for the graphics folks.=20 >> You are literally making a lot of people very mad at you for not >> listening to them. >I'm awaiting brooks@ reply to shed light on what led to planning/prioritiz= ation >failure. Otherwise, it looks like a one-off misunderstanding. It is not. There have been many complaints about you to over the past six months. I've not had success being nice, so I'm being firm now. >> There's a lot of smart people in the project, and when they are mad >> at you for how you've done something, it pays to listen. They are >> almost certainly right. > >I do listen but don't blindly follow unless requested by the authority in = charge. >"Smart people" is ambiguous term, those who excel at coding may no= t be good at >negotiating. Obviously, you have a lot more such experience b= ut the current attitude >falls short. My current attitude is because I'm sick to death of mopping up messes cause= d by your lack of attention to detail and your lack of acknowledging that there'= s a problem here to fix. My attitude is a direct result of prior attempts faili= ng to produce better behavior and at my wits end for knowing how to move forwa= rd. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Fri Oct 4 16:26:09 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEB0C1327C3 for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 16:26:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46lFcK5C8Hz4XT6 for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 16:26:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id B270D1327C1; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 16:26:09 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: x11@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B225B1327C0 for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 16:26:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46lFcK48dJz4XT3 for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 16:26:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 73A7C26E4B for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 16:26:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x94GQ9XC098058 for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 16:26:09 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x94GQ9Am098055 for x11@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 16:26:09 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 239682] Default to devel/llvm90 when libLLVM/libclang are required or if /usr/bin/clang is not enough Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2019 16:26:08 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-qa X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: brooks@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jbeich@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback+ X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2019 16:26:09 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D239682 --- Comment #28 from Brooks Davis --- (In reply to Jan Beich from comment #23) I did prepare over the whole 9.0.0 cycle, I find your implications that I d= id not offensive. You are correct that some bugs won't be found until LLVM_DEFAULT is bumped,= but doing it without coordination with me (the PR does not count) and making the switch the I was unavailable to respond to the reports is unacceptable. I'm upset that users are getting a less than ideal experience due to your needl= ess rush to bump the default and worse that we've inflicted it on the quarterly branch effectively untested. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Fri Oct 4 16:39:39 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78E2C132BE4 for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 16:39:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46lFvv2XDmz4Y5x for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 16:39:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 55183132BE3; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 16:39:39 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: x11@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54D88132BE2 for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 16:39:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46lFvv1gXNz4Y5w for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 16:39:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E45927026 for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 16:39:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x94GddGH025783 for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 16:39:39 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x94Gddu0025782 for x11@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 16:39:39 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 239682] Default to devel/llvm90 when libLLVM/libclang are required or if /usr/bin/clang is not enough Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2019 16:39:37 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-qa X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: imp@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jbeich@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback+ X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2019 16:39:39 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D239682 --- Comment #29 from Warner Losh --- Let's also look at the timeline: September 19th: 9.0.0 was released September 25th: llvm90 port was updated to 9.0.0 release September 28th: LLVM_DEFAULT bumped. 3 days is too fast. It broke things like llvm (I burned half a day digging = out from that mess after I updated after the packages were built). It couldn't = have possibly been tested in just 3 days. Finally, the exprun for FreeBSD base has kept it from upgrading to 9.0 beca= use the fallout from this upgrade is too large. Let that sink in: we can't upgr= ade base because llvm 9.0 is too broken. And yet it got rushed in just before t= he quarterly branch. This is not sound engineering. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Fri Oct 4 16:54:24 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DB4913306E for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 16:54:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46lGDw1Llbz4YmB for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 16:54:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 2E42A13306C; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 16:54:24 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: x11@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E06913306B for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 16:54:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46lGDw0SB7z4Ym8 for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 16:54:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E44D2273B8 for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 16:54:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x94GsNF8069542 for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 16:54:23 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x94GsN0q069541 for x11@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 16:54:23 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 239682] Default to devel/llvm90 when libLLVM/libclang are required or if /usr/bin/clang is not enough Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2019 16:54:23 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-qa X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: imp@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jbeich@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback+ X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2019 16:54:24 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D239682 --- Comment #30 from Warner Losh --- Two edits to my last message: (1) LLVM_DEFAULT was bumped September 20th, 5 days before the port was upda= ted to the 9.0 release: Author: jbeich Date: Fri Sep 20 19:58:36 2019 +0000 Switch default devel/llvm* to 90 PR: 239682 Reviewed by: tobik Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D21172 git-svn-id: svn+ssh://svn.freebsd.org/ports/head@512440 35697150-7ecd-e111-bb59-0022644237b5 So the bug was closed the 28th, but the default was updated days before the port was updated. (2) the thing that broke for me was gnome (or some part of gnome, it's hard= to know for sure since it rendered my laptop unusable in X w/o switching to something else)... --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Fri Oct 4 17:04:48 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C34A133476 for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 17:04:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46lGSw1jjxz4ZJn for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 17:04:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 3ABDF133474; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 17:04:48 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: x11@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A7FA133473 for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 17:04:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46lGSw0tjbz4ZJm for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 17:04:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 01C45275A2 for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 17:04:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x94H4lIF092658 for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 17:04:47 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x94H4lDp092657 for x11@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 17:04:47 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 239682] Default to devel/llvm90 when libLLVM/libclang are required or if /usr/bin/clang is not enough Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2019 17:04:47 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-qa X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: jbeich@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jbeich@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback+ X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2019 17:04:48 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D239682 --- Comment #31 from Jan Beich --- (In reply to Brooks Davis from comment #28) > You are correct that some bugs won't be found until LLVM_DEFAULT is bumpe= d, but > doing it without coordination with me (the PR does not count) and making = the > switch the I was unavailable to respond to the reports is unacceptable. "(the PR does not count)" bit is offensive to me. In ports/ the primary way= to cooperate with each other is either via bugzilla. Other ways are too easily lost in the noise. For one, portmgr@ encourages every ports/ contributor to file a bug even for stuff submitted on phabricator. Why are you ignoring the place where the coordination happens? > I'm upset that users are getting a less than ideal experience due to > your needless rush to bump the default and worse that we've > inflicted it on the quarterly branch effectively untested. Despite watching bugzilla, maillists, freebsd forums, reddit, twitter, gitt= er everything looked fine. Now that Warner said Gnome (without giving more details) I've searched again and have found the following: https://forums.freebsd.org/threads/gnome-starts-in-black.72497/post-441133 If so (i.e., related) it implies only /quarterly users run Gnome, so the is= sue wouldn't be found by extra waiting on /latest. The fix would be to pin mesa= -dri to llvm80. Would have to be done during LLVM_DEFAULT=3D100 bump, anyway. (In reply to Warner Losh from comment #29) > Finally, the exprun for FreeBSD base has kept it from upgrading to > 9.0 because the fallout from this upgrade is too large. Let that > sink in: we can't upgrade base because llvm 9.0 is too broken. And > yet it got rushed in just before the quarterly branch. This is not > sound engineering. LLVM_DEFAULT bump is too small scale compared to base Clang upgrades. There= are only 43 consumers. I regularly touch ports with ~100 consumers, often witho= ut filing any bugs. And I've helped fixing base Clang bustage as well. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Fri Oct 4 17:15:28 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDA9E133A76 for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 17:15:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46lGjD5zDRz4b2D for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 17:15:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id CCF5B133A75; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 17:15:28 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: x11@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCB40133A74 for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 17:15:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46lGjD4ghpz4b28 for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 17:15:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8535C27793 for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 17:15:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x94HFSGJ019005 for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 17:15:28 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x94HFSGR019004 for x11@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 17:15:28 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 239682] Default to devel/llvm90 when libLLVM/libclang are required or if /usr/bin/clang is not enough Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2019 17:15:26 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-qa X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: linimon@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jbeich@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback+ X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2019 17:15:29 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D239682 --- Comment #32 from Mark Linimon --- (In reply to Jan Beich from comment #31) > If so (i.e., related) it implies only /quarterly users run Gnome This is a false assumption. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Fri Oct 4 17:57:01 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E814134C47 for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 17:57:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jsm@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [96.47.72.83]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46lHd90vmjz4dGD; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 17:57:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jsm@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freebsd2.freebsd.lan (mail.northatlanticmusicsupplies.com [90.185.194.38]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: jsm) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A5A0C2150; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 17:57:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jsm@FreeBSD.org) Subject: Re: Xwayland under sway invisible running x11 apps. From: Jesper Schmitz Mouridsen To: Jan Beich Cc: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org References: <018ae261-fe05-b8a3-13e8-1e96177025e8@FreeBSD.org> <5zl7-kki9-wny@FreeBSD.org> Message-ID: <29f995a8-6c3a-c001-67a2-0660a00e15ec@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2019 19:56:38 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2019 17:57:01 -0000 Hi The difference was the wayland option in mesa-libs it was turned off. Turning it back on and the problem is back. So there might be a problem with libEGL on ivybridge. Also see https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237662. Firefox with MOZ_ACCELERATED=1 renders a light gray surface and no visible context... /jsm On 02.10.2019 23.18, Jesper Schmitz Mouridsen wrote: > > On 02.10.2019 21.36, Jan Beich wrote: >> Jesper Schmitz Mouridsen writes: >> >>> Hi >>> >>> Running sway, which starts XWayland enables me to start X11 apps.. >>> >>> I can see the apps runinng with xwininfo. >>> >>> However X11 apps are not rendered visible on the monitor. >> Does forcing DRI3 via "export LIBGL_DRI3_ENABLE=1" or building >> graphics/mesa-{libs,dri} with CFLAGS+=-D__DRM_NEXT__ help? >> >> Xwayland needs DRI3 but FreeBSD disables it as a kludge for >> drm-legacy-kmod: >>    graphics/mesa-dri/files/patch-src_glx_glxext.c >> graphics/mesa-dri/files/patch-src_egl_drivers_dri2_platform__x11.c > > Thanks for the hints, reinstalling  mesa-{libs,dri} from ports did the > trick..X11-apps are now visible > > I did not need to set -D__DRM_NEXT__ though, so I don't what was wrong.. > > I've drm-fbsd12.0-kmod-4.16.g20190814 installed. > > Regards > > jsm > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-x11@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-x11 > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-x11-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Fri Oct 4 18:10:26 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A804134E7A for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 18:10:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46lHwd6Zxsz4dgg for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 18:10:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id DFEB2134E78; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 18:10:25 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: x11@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEA20134E77 for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 18:10:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46lHwd5QCkz4dgd for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 18:10:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 83521DC for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 18:10:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x94IAPP1088897 for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 18:10:25 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x94IAP4P088886 for x11@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 18:10:25 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 239682] Default to devel/llvm90 when libLLVM/libclang are required or if /usr/bin/clang is not enough Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2019 18:10:25 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-qa X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: brooks@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jbeich@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback+ X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2019 18:10:26 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D239682 --- Comment #33 from Brooks Davis --- (In reply to Jan Beich from comment #31) > > You are correct that some bugs won't be found until LLVM_DEFAULT is bum= ped, but > > doing it without coordination with me (the PR does not count) and makin= g the > > switch the I was unavailable to respond to the reports is unacceptable. >=20 > "(the PR does not count)" bit is offensive to me. In ports/ the primary w= ay to cooperate with each other is either via bugzilla. Other ways are too = easily lost in the noise. For one, portmgr@ encourages every ports/ contrib= utor to file a bug even for stuff submitted on phabricator. A PR is useful and necessary for a something like this, but a group PR with noisy history is no substitute for making individual contact with the most effected parties. If you only want to communicate via PRs then I can make a habit of setting maintainer-feedback to "-" immediately, but that doesn't f= eel like a constructive way to proceed. One additional point on LLVM updates, many downstream projects don't do the= ir updates to new versions until after release. This isn't great, but it's reality. In the past I've found we had better luck waiting a few weeks or = even a month so more things had been updated to support modern LLVM versions to reduce the amount of version smear in a typical pkg set. Making the LLVM_DEFAULT bump lift as many ports as possible at once is helpful in that= it reduces the number of stragglers that need to be chased down later as we tr= y to keep the number of versions under control. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Fri Oct 4 20:09:10 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EC2013805A for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 20:09:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46lLYf1J07z3JV9 for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 20:09:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 2C6AE138059; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 20:09:10 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: x11@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C2DE138058 for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 20:09:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46lLYf0PWhz3JV7 for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 20:09:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E3117170D for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 20:09:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x94K99BX083100 for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 20:09:09 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from bugzilla@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x94K992B083099 for x11@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 20:09:09 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: bugzilla set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 239682] Default to devel/llvm90 when libLLVM/libclang are required or if /usr/bin/clang is not enough Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2019 20:09:07 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-qa X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: commit-hook@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jbeich@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback+ X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2019 20:09:10 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D239682 --- Comment #34 from commit-hook@freebsd.org --- A commit references this bug: Author: jbeich Date: Fri Oct 4 20:08:28 UTC 2019 New revision: 513776 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/513776 Log: graphics/mesa-dri: revert r512573 and limit to llvm80 after r512440 Mesa 18.3 doesn't support LLVM 9. While some fixes were backported there're probably more issues. Apparently, Gnome shows black screen. As the port is unlikely to be ready for future LLVM_DEFAULT bumps without a version update just limit to previously tested value. PR: 239682 Requested by: imp Changes: head/graphics/libosmesa/Makefile head/graphics/mesa-dri/Makefile head/graphics/mesa-dri/Makefile.common head/graphics/mesa-dri/files/patch-0a7e767 head/graphics/mesa-dri/files/patch-39d0c68 head/graphics/mesa-dri/files/patch-3e249b8 head/graphics/mesa-dri/files/patch-648dc52 head/graphics/mesa-dri/files/patch-b5012a0 head/graphics/mesa-dri/files/patch-dded2ed head/graphics/mesa-dri/files/patch-e4803ab head/lang/clover/Makefile --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Fri Oct 4 20:10:11 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE55013811A for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 20:10:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46lLZq4Ct7z3Jcn for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 20:10:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 90C3D138119; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 20:10:11 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: x11@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 908D6138118 for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 20:10:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46lLZq3Dxdz3Jck for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 20:10:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 53B571718 for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 20:10:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x94KABZM084632 for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 20:10:11 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from bugzilla@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x94KAB9T084631 for x11@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 20:10:11 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: bugzilla set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 239682] Default to devel/llvm90 when libLLVM/libclang are required or if /usr/bin/clang is not enough Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2019 20:10:11 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-qa X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: commit-hook@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jbeich@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback+ X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2019 20:10:11 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D239682 --- Comment #35 from commit-hook@freebsd.org --- A commit references this bug: Author: jbeich Date: Fri Oct 4 20:09:13 UTC 2019 New revision: 513777 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/513777 Log: MFH: r513776 graphics/mesa-dri: revert r512573 and limit to llvm80 after r512440 Mesa 18.3 doesn't support LLVM 9. While some fixes were backported there're probably more issues. Apparently, Gnome shows black screen. As the port is unlikely to be ready for future LLVM_DEFAULT bumps without a version update just limit to previously tested value. PR: 239682 Requested by: imp Approved by: ports-secteam blanket Changes: _U branches/2019Q4/ branches/2019Q4/graphics/libosmesa/Makefile branches/2019Q4/graphics/mesa-dri/Makefile branches/2019Q4/graphics/mesa-dri/Makefile.common branches/2019Q4/graphics/mesa-dri/files/patch-0a7e767 branches/2019Q4/graphics/mesa-dri/files/patch-39d0c68 branches/2019Q4/graphics/mesa-dri/files/patch-3e249b8 branches/2019Q4/graphics/mesa-dri/files/patch-648dc52 branches/2019Q4/graphics/mesa-dri/files/patch-b5012a0 branches/2019Q4/graphics/mesa-dri/files/patch-dded2ed branches/2019Q4/graphics/mesa-dri/files/patch-e4803ab branches/2019Q4/lang/clover/Makefile --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Fri Oct 4 20:22:18 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7166813868A for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 20:22:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46lLrp2Ny4z3KHY for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 20:22:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 520E7138689; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 20:22:18 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: x11@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51D6B138688 for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 20:22:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46lLrp1YVXz3KHX for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 20:22:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 19DAA1AA8 for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 20:22:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x94KMHX3068810 for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 20:22:17 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x94KMHS0068780 for x11@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 20:22:17 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 239682] Default to devel/llvm90 when libLLVM/libclang are required or if /usr/bin/clang is not enough Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2019 20:22:18 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-qa X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: jbeich@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jbeich@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback+ X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2019 20:22:18 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D239682 --- Comment #36 from Jan Beich --- Only Mesa because it will remain stuck on llvm80 for years due to complicat= ions with QA and build system. I don't think anything else can affect Gnome. If = you find more regressions, please, report. Binary package estimates: /latest around Saturday evening. Delays mainly come from ports r513733 and ports r513734. /quarterly around Sunday morning as previous build hasn't finished yet. (In reply to Brooks Davis from comment #33) Bug noise is a good argument. I'll think of a solution e.g., splitting into many bugs, removing CC after approval, mailing off-bug. "typical pkg set" argument is double-edged, sacrificing many for the few. If LLVM_DEFAULT is too old (e.g., misses some C++20 stuff or has bugs only fix= ed in later version) it may lead to individual ports hardcoding llvm versions. However, some like Mesa can avoid RUN_DEPENDS by statically linking. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Fri Oct 4 20:35:25 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4193138A35 for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 20:35:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46lM7x5ps8z3KmQ for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 20:35:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id C78D4138A34; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 20:35:25 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: x11@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C75A6138A33 for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 20:35:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46lM7x4tpgz3KmN for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 20:35:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C8B51CAC for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 20:35:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x94KZPLX068035 for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 20:35:25 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x94KZPjh068033 for x11@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 20:35:25 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 239682] Default to devel/llvm90 when libLLVM/libclang are required or if /usr/bin/clang is not enough Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2019 20:35:23 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-qa X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: imp@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jbeich@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback+ X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2019 20:35:25 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D239682 --- Comment #37 from Warner Losh --- Thanks Jan for updating Mesa. I'll see if that helps. The effects were quite odd (mouse didn't function sometimes, scrolling broken, switching windows caused hangs) and it took me a while to rule things out (tried a different mouse, tried the same advice on other computer, tracked down it was related= to gnome, and not x11, sorting out trying latest drm-kmod, etc). --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Fri Oct 4 20:36:09 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48B90138AAC for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 20:36:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46lM8n0rlwz3KqW for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 20:36:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 1D06C138AA2; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 20:36:09 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: x11@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CBC1138AA1 for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 20:36:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46lM8m73pmz3KqS for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 20:36:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D79BE1CBC for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 20:36:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x94Ka8HI068981 for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 20:36:08 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x94Ka8R5068980 for x11@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 20:36:08 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 239682] Default to devel/llvm90 when libLLVM/libclang are required or if /usr/bin/clang is not enough Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2019 20:36:07 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-qa X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: brooks@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jbeich@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback+ X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2019 20:36:09 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D239682 --- Comment #38 from Brooks Davis --- (In reply to Jan Beich from comment #36) > "typical pkg set" argument is double-edged, sacrificing many for the few.= If LLVM_DEFAULT is too old (e.g., misses some C++20 stuff or has bugs only= fixed in later version) it may lead to individual ports hardcoding llvm ve= rsions. However, some like Mesa can avoid RUN_DEPENDS by statically linking. I'd like to see us bump LLVM_DEFAULT well before the next release comes out (roughly every six months), I just think it's best to give it some settle t= ime. One could argue for waiting for the X.0.1 patch release, but that's probab= ly more conservative than necessary. FWIW, I do get a fair bit of dogfooding even in the RCs without soliciting testing. It might be worth doing a call for testing on the mailing list for LLVM_DEFAULT bumps in the future. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Fri Oct 4 22:14:29 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE06C13AE3C for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 22:14:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46lPLF4800z3wrw for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 22:14:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 8E1B213AE3A; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 22:14:29 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: x11@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DE1013AE39 for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 22:14:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46lPLF3HhSz3wrv for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 22:14:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 55AC02EAC for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 22:14:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x94METi9029185 for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 22:14:29 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from bugzilla@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x94METpu029184 for x11@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 22:14:29 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: bugzilla set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 239682] Default to devel/llvm90 when libLLVM/libclang are required or if /usr/bin/clang is not enough Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2019 22:14:28 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-qa X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: commit-hook@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jbeich@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback+ X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2019 22:14:29 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D239682 --- Comment #39 from commit-hook@freebsd.org --- A commit references this bug: Author: zeising Date: Fri Oct 4 22:14:04 UTC 2019 New revision: 513788 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/513788 Log: Bump remaining mesa ports after llvm version change Bump these mesa ports as well, to ensure that they are rebuilt with the correct llvm port. This was missed in r513776 PR: 239682 MFH: 2019Q4 (implicit, fix for earlier commits) Changes: head/graphics/libxatracker/Makefile head/graphics/mesa-libs/Makefile head/lang/clover/Makefile --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Fri Oct 4 22:16:33 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79E9813AF96 for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 22:16:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46lPNd2ZBcz3x3M for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 22:16:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 5825713AF95; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 22:16:33 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: x11@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57E6513AF94 for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 22:16:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46lPNd1gPRz3x3K for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 22:16:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E1962EC8 for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 22:16:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x94MGWTF032534 for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 22:16:32 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from bugzilla@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x94MGWJn032533 for x11@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 22:16:32 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: bugzilla set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 239682] Default to devel/llvm90 when libLLVM/libclang are required or if /usr/bin/clang is not enough Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2019 22:16:32 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-qa X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: commit-hook@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jbeich@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback+ X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2019 22:16:33 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D239682 --- Comment #40 from commit-hook@freebsd.org --- A commit references this bug: Author: zeising Date: Fri Oct 4 22:15:36 UTC 2019 New revision: 513789 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/513789 Log: MFH: r513788 Bump remaining mesa ports after llvm version change Bump these mesa ports as well, to ensure that they are rebuilt with the correct llvm port. This was missed in r513776 PR: 239682 Approved by: ports-secteam (implicit, cleanup after earlier commits) Changes: _U branches/2019Q4/ branches/2019Q4/graphics/libxatracker/Makefile branches/2019Q4/graphics/mesa-libs/Makefile branches/2019Q4/lang/clover/Makefile --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Sat Oct 5 15:09:39 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2459135720 for ; Sat, 5 Oct 2019 15:09:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from raichoo@acmelabs.space) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46lqsb3GB7z3KZZ for ; Sat, 5 Oct 2019 15:09:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from raichoo@acmelabs.space) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 6DDF413571F; Sat, 5 Oct 2019 15:09:39 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: x11@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DA3713571E for ; Sat, 5 Oct 2019 15:09:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from raichoo@acmelabs.space) Received: from mail.acmelabs.space (acmelabs.space [185.244.195.243]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46lqsY5Lhnz3KZY for ; Sat, 5 Oct 2019 15:09:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from raichoo@acmelabs.space) Received: from lain.fritz.box (dslb-188-100-249-041.188.100.pools.vodafone-ip.de [188.100.249.41]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.acmelabs.space (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 79DFC343F for ; Sat, 5 Oct 2019 15:09:29 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=acmelabs.space; s=dkim; t=1570288169; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type; bh=r3maEpPxJxMc84iNort8ST+WzYNdDZvwgX/sh3NPqns=; b=IZbSgNvEhWQ5VYP7HyKig0SJtwNUA6/p7dHjbgAJhlJB6fJFWd5nGK6AXm4l7y1iflc4R3 tHoJiwN6KsJuYGp4tPnfLRFItiX8lw7WVPBHjggalD7Kit2jkFTvvPnlGKVV9Flb716fKe HdHuc7AuZR4SNI1FWr81A3XBH6jw8pc= Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2019 17:09:31 +0200 From: raichoo To: x11@freebsd.org Subject: Xwayland bug when using multiple screens Message-ID: <20191005150931.GA22049@lain.fritz.box> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="9amGYk9869ThD9tj" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.2 (2019-09-21) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46lqsY5Lhnz3KZY X-Spamd-Bar: ++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=acmelabs.space header.s=dkim header.b=IZbSgNvE; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of raichoo@acmelabs.space has no SPF policy when checking 185.244.195.243) smtp.mailfrom=raichoo@acmelabs.space X-Spamd-Result: default: False [2.17 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[acmelabs.space:s=dkim]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(0.42)[asn: 197540(2.14), country: DE(-0.01)]; HAS_ATTACHMENT(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/mixed,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[x11@freebsd.org]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.65)[0.649,0]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[acmelabs.space:+]; CTYPE_MIXED_BOGUS(1.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[acmelabs.space]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.40)[0.396,0]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[41.249.100.188.khpj7ygk5idzvmvt5x4ziurxhy.zen.dq.spamhaus.net : 127.0.0.11]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:197540, ipnet:185.244.192.0/22, country:DE]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Oct 2019 15:09:39 -0000 --9amGYk9869ThD9tj Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Hi, I've noticed a bug with xwayland on FreeBSD when using multiple monitors. In my setup I'm using 2 monitors A (with width 1680) and B (width 2560). Monitor A is on the left side in the monitor layout. When running `firefox` (or any other X11 application) on monitor B it only appears to track mouse coordinates until it hits x = 880. Running `xev` I can see that xwayland communicates that the cursors position is on x = 2560 at the root window when I hit the spot where things are going wrong. So for some reason Xwayland does not take into account that monitor B is inside of a monitor layout and assumes that the origin starts at x = 1680 (width of monitor A) and does not look beyond x = 880 (1680 + 880 = 2560 which is the size of monitor B). I've tried this with sway as well as with my own compositor (written using wlroots as well). I could reproduce this on 2 different machines). Anyone else having that problem as well? Kind regards, raichoo --9amGYk9869ThD9tj Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="raichoo@acmelabs.space.gpg.asc" -----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- mQINBFxxaJsBEADQmuIyVv+mSAwNNEP3nfkz98Sz5xuC4yU8D3jsPRWLIeEnq1r6 MxjwFcJVpM1A7Q5s9Hy+j6FHTfBdYarG7jNsH85renUSbFrtBcYng7BgRyKAuYCb pKBx3hNVEjXjZN7FvGUYt4cC9UEiTaSOCqG1vuwMLTnVBB0TCvQaSRGk5jNDd0Q0 +IyWW7nYtamqk47VpBpzm25t1TecWik9MtT44IRq6X1CS6VQNp/w89vv5dv0raBf rRhz9tjoPie1ubBFwyL7m5o28lUwXxRRymlMwd0eMCcRcghGqa9qQDZuTUTkt/D7 53lqLqPrguU+wgkopZGry4nVt8Td5UDMoLSTfYnuGznDKBSPeRGgzzdsw1Bf4Adj 6v2ZFTF3Me8hHHwhhXpY1chIY+R7eUZ6M5Mmwl3Aq5qppfxtnvRAh+EqvB7+379r +e1HWFI/6HU5YTIqqGZP2KUO9geNqaM2arSVqMe78SAvcPDzohhUuuH/jsk70EOF qaDH4XvHOq9I9L3FxqKBn1N6ACz4PMl6y9bBIgEAyGgj8K7JzYiGFO2K3KD8OREs RZHmPLBMLCo0ubHhbCD/F18DpEt0f91yHAHCdvfnbq6XjvqJXi77l404tv2G48os ZkK7ySiJuRj3eL4MuNRoipD4LgjH96Vk6dGz/f9c1wxoLArDeZ8HIGZ4MwARAQAB tCByYWljaG9vIDxyYWljaG9vQGFjbWVsYWJzLnNwYWNlPokCVAQTAQgAPhYhBCca wIfbaYxkK6g55RY25bHFTCgfBQJccWibAhsDBQkDwmcABQsJCAcCBhUKCQgLAgQW AgMBAh4BAheAAAoJEBY25bHFTCgfPqUP/jA1xKKKeUW7ovATMKmVDPJiwsJrLBRw 4e7Q4brbxbAQ2/qdmCIy8gxsKmayyFYUtwK6MsQA1JN/hKjWIE/hi6DA3Q1M5BwE hthyEZm6RBtQWQfPZ4Mwi+daG/9JJc0M+ZKpZbyh7DXD81stLC1mZyXMl8D+MqWn /GmZO7o4x6eDXxIvPUViGXSU8vL3lLScj2+Uvc7fS4AlQnpZP3MQ7tqUfOca4bGO 83DYCRlc8GXb1WvDH9Nab2dnbXnH1urk9d2Wla940txwZqXb5w/87uvn5dp+kt03 c3IBQJy6jWFMMaPG5W5MVw60Cx8KvD8j3XTjM2w6PSc6lauJpfzwAKkrLR12JjBK wkyIaJ+1/VAg1OthR6RkMGAZe5J2p7K5XcXUXa5hnnU7Kbk7E3d6sDY3VRx98849 5XzV1jkcuQhkQB5Z0XDQOJP27THTSgx94iK5TD7LDgVJgxYpDAeV0fsHBUeRUa7W u7CGe/h60ENGzw4IZLmvj8iAFZAfPsxI10kyaLx6Jh4pjv5nSj5Fhk+p+JuPl928 OwUtkaG9gvv7S8lzberMNYM31BqXVb+A6GGiAxdUfazwkW22UPrFtQtejycVXpUN CqA0pgyqOtPrEA70tdD/5R4LNORHHZ6VK6LeZTt9p6ZWYhStLcTO9r3HBAGrRwe+ bu8oMLgXfQxhuQINBFxxaJsBEAClF6yLrtkuuDWC2psQP1ppViFy/FYxGP32nYXV AwnT1U0tCLi8shF9CYg7rpcY3fEfqQBhVGgkYrPIo7WqjWCfMVqJhhU0NMuOWSqf npyqGhCGTjdtY/j93eHPL/sTpfGYmI59r5GkG0+cyBwK3lrmT9bQeRPbOxSpHsSf aqUb0iWhHUqvU5+y5d1zkNIXxTKNXjtK4+cvud4SOH1RBZhDxOEB+jtIQpx3a2rg mMFb1pMD/NJ2wmoyUNEgxlTCG2zxHuLPZUz6y4xJtGZUKaC12rr2u0JAaxrNWMiU yPI6BadT6h1LyA3pROe8ZKEPGnDjXg5P9hZFtIzx/b/iglmEeO0U/AuP62QpN1q2 l0wJ+mvxD/iCMPVkRrCQ2300Ym2Nk2aNXqsFdeaeVVspUbu0l6sWBXt5g+BCmdsv DwX1bwJ4s/ZKOeu5yRGmNDuAg3lIBT+sRiFQKsPchqFZBDv8Q5oB4WBkRpaCc8mF TX/7RiCIw/A6ucBby+SKflpOhOAjD0H3tPreJTxdhSFTVUgU0CausR4ckBCvJWAa KQLm+vInTr94bDG1GHoNbioj9sa2h0S7ZxAsGs7AFRykkdoW/ij4HHpANveQd6Ws acpKuPm74ajeZ7hMN/Ur/tVfeM6MqfBNQpHt5gJ9P6xMCBKT/PUo/+0oISiU3pdT FWiPGwARAQABiQI8BBgBCAAmFiEEJxrAh9tpjGQrqDnlFjblscVMKB8FAlxxaJsC GwwFCQPCZwAACgkQFjblscVMKB/g+A//WvSMLgKWQEmY4T7y0ybmtkhW4vHSu58o YY7SqlejwoRvJgeqvlIq50sQVCapUMOCt6KN3YWH9JW8Z7hmEji2wNlz7koZEeTk EGb+6430/snDlylUxsltNyU0giterNFtTXP+UXQbtjveXCCBSqSkbbM5x/ZsJSGn MSQz/HCS60zigPbkKCUztlpN/pGCR1/KFUBPoPY5Yoazf7W5vrMUHKjH8sRRQ3TL UBL81TUze4Eg6+d5Vymw+21ufNLgPy4/tg2sd8TPnIASFmH8u+d6cM8kRAdfrYII 46cQ8yfP5m+G2EBBeaZsiQUZwcRy385NSUrQQtk9zQbR0TOh3gXLtlPKMj1aFl32 0nAzRtK4oOktte6n17B0NXjPIOKxz4j6yKDzQi5kFEqhCd8ziZk+o12B989hTpwx HZPmiymNrj1o8eRpcj09ZqQ0kVWt9WHSA6N5vkP6WH2mUkBaIDp5T2raLIO8Ddhx KtBxaQ5EsThQrRgaOHsjl5EXn8m4QolkYZTs10xopSLwSDWit39uPXwr9sNKwnJn +zbdnCmJ5S7F13PKOQe3OC4hokkWxcQ8WVPiJjnbakn1Yy7jtKg1psoUA41vGrt/ 2MDG1ZDrBqO6QJ9FuYAaEH50OZiNympimhy8BqUThN/qDb8mADGxNPcZ9/mS5AR7 o4kTuD+uxAg= =yh5q -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- --9amGYk9869ThD9tj-- From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Sat Oct 5 17:36:38 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2764A138B8C for ; Sat, 5 Oct 2019 17:36:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from shamaz.mazum@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ed1-x531.google.com (mail-ed1-x531.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::531]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46lv792gFhz3xv7 for ; Sat, 5 Oct 2019 17:36:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from shamaz.mazum@gmail.com) Received: by mail-ed1-x531.google.com with SMTP id h2so8813378edn.3 for ; Sat, 05 Oct 2019 10:36:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=z/9RdZK5MZ4yLkbS7aau6lzUx04WDIUL1CXKEo6KvbU=; b=YNWQGQNLda0RVvWXyrobcvBguMqjz3XFbSgzRoxqVhdvhqqJnXaRplpENlRuy7rioe 9/puIPnMAefpcbpfyJ1jjXEd81crDDcf7PGt+CnATICOiaq7pHP5SD88V99F8pmziMfl oC5TlHInYTjcouxgCz04T+sCT2zrAkyQ/78gVlcJdfyJJw8cCIQcFz0XX2bEss1VZswR kJpIDEcYlCOhCO/XpJR4s0O4tJiSs6Df7oYhdgZYLYUWGKliB5tn6EKLK8EJ/qVaJUi3 CleRzkAARHlwuBxy+f8UCVdfL8N3/SiqZZwX3o0EQI9Nl9htB/m5OjkCYUqWCNBMq+Ek dqRQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=z/9RdZK5MZ4yLkbS7aau6lzUx04WDIUL1CXKEo6KvbU=; b=eZ7kp1VPipqQzPo+/LWV2gpej2n7iZEjXSjTByyYQ0IZIvYwfjx6BldyGleJFIhHlH XRW6MlKy5gRIvfq7PuZQZZUvGBqt8JeLCfjz/mn+wZcgYEv4uBpM4lfO1pjta0YJcF2R Tf1w876F0NohnJ1Qk8IGJLyT3Nhrxpn6iroIGvPkxgQ+V+nX4DRpv9ePn+wyWnb2QkgM uRMNw5O9bAWZA3UAkzcr50X2GjdiGKtp/gzYQ35+LIoXeJX6rWDtxX5SFV8g8WUa4A9J GWsROxttO9XtPTLPwP+XkgxIoU+RvCjxUqIh9VrgyiIPSBeB9ASWjOwm+go6v/YTniKY cx7g== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAV4aUdD/KgSbib+l5dhIkpTLpe5GhVsYuOP3gUM7M6Cyove06+z B15W5u+IGHFbT9lVem23auWQkfHdzbi0mTd1OAm2L0Ergz0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxU0v5i6PjqOVMZWrOmEKcWO9jP6Rgh8X3P0oIO7FSGduWT1egjsb048t2Ef8dDlVRzr28i4C0BxtQ/DD2TWIo= X-Received: by 2002:aa7:d9d5:: with SMTP id v21mr21152520eds.106.1570296995661; Sat, 05 Oct 2019 10:36:35 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <300f65b7469c608ad4cd32a9ad6c41d6@unrelenting.technology> In-Reply-To: <300f65b7469c608ad4cd32a9ad6c41d6@unrelenting.technology> From: Vasily Postnicov Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2019 20:36:24 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Xorg with evdev input devices To: greg@unrelenting.technology Cc: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46lv792gFhz3xv7 X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=YNWQGQNL; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of shamazmazum@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4864:20::531 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=shamazmazum@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.00 / 15.00]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a00:1450:4000::/36:c]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; URI_COUNT_ODD(1.00)[13]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(0.00)[ip: (-9.56), ipnet: 2a00:1450::/32(-2.89), asn: 15169(-2.15), country: US(-0.05)]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2a00:1450::/32, country:US]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-x11@freebsd.org]; IP_SCORE_FREEMAIL(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[1.3.5.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.0.0.4.6.8.4.0.5.4.1.0.0.a.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Oct 2019 17:36:38 -0000 Hello again, Greg. I have some more time to play with Wayland. I'm trying to resolve permission errors when accessing /dev/input/event* using consolekit2. I did as you said and have active consolekit session when I log in. > ck-list-sessions Session5: unix-user =3D '1001' realname =3D 'Vasily Postnicov' seat =3D 'Seat1' session-type =3D 'unspecified' session-class =3D 'user' session-state =3D 'online' active =3D FALSE x11-display =3D '' x11-display-device =3D '' display-device =3D '/dev/ttyv0' remote-host-name =3D '' is-local =3D TRUE on-since =3D '2019-10-05T15:25:27.297123Z' login-session-id =3D '' XDG_RUNTIME_DIR =3D '/var/run/user/1001' VTNr =3D '1' When I start sway I have this now: vasily@vonbraun:~ % sway 2019-10-05 19:44:54 - [backend/drm/legacy.c:15] HDMI-A-2: Failed to set CRTC: Permission denied 2019-10-05 19:44:54 - [backend/drm/legacy.c:15] DVI-D-1: Failed to set CRTC: Permission denied 2019-10-05 19:44:54 - [main.c:521] Missing a required Wayland interface Using just chmod 666 /dev/input/* without consolekit works fine. UPD: Using truss I've found what ioctl DRM_IOCTL_MODE_SETCRTC fails (see https://i.postimg.cc/cWVcb8wc/IMG-20191005-201103.jpg). I use amdgpu driver from graphics/drm-fbsd12.0-kmod-4.16.g20190814. After changing line > DRM_IOCTL_DEF(DRM_IOCTL_MODE_SETCRTC, drm_mode_setcrtc, DRM_MASTER|DRM_CONTROL_ALLOW|DRM_UNLOCKED), to > DRM_IOCTL_DEF(DRM_IOCTL_MODE_SETCRTC, drm_mode_setcrtc, DRM_CONTROL_ALLOW|DRM_UNLOCKED), in drivers/gpu/drm/drm_ioctl.c ioctl call works fine, but sway still cannot see input devices. My verdict: before using ConsoleKit2 we must at least fix this ioctl issue. I don't know what DRM_MASTER is and if it is safe to remove it. Maybe consolekit itself and not the driver must be fixed. =D0=B2=D1=81, 22 =D1=81=D0=B5=D0=BD=D1=82. 2019 =D0=B3. =D0=B2 19:31, : > September 22, 2019 7:12 PM, "Vasily Postnicov" > wrote: > > > Thanks, it works. The purpose of my evdev kernel support testing is > eventually switch to wayland. > > For this time I have all related ports recompiled with WAYLAND option > and also have x11-wm/sway > > installed. Then I run following commands in terminal (I mean, without > xorg server running): > > > >> setenv XDG_RUNTIME_DIR /tmp > > > >> sway -d > > > > Sway fails to start with the following log: > https://pastebin.com/M3eExb0C > > > >> 2019-09-22 18:53:04 - [backend/libinput/backend.c:55] Initializing > libinput > >> 2019-09-22 18:53:04 - [backend/libinput/backend.c:84] libinput > initialization failed, no input > > devices > >> 2019-09-22 18:53:04 - [backend/libinput/backend.c:85] Set > WLR_LIBINPUT_NO_DEVICES=3D1 to suppress > > this check > >> 2019-09-22 18:53:04 - [backend/multi/backend.c:32] Failed to initializ= e > backend. > >> 2019-09-22 18:53:04 - [sway/server.c:195] Failed to start backend > > > > I've tried to run "setenv WLR_LIBINPUT_NO_DEVICES 1" as suggested and > got sway started (but without > > input devices, I suppose). What's wrong with my libinput? It seems it > works OK with Xorg > > Your sway process doesn't have permission to access /dev/input/*. > > [re: the little follow-up email: setuid does not help, because input > devices are attached after dropping root, because input devices need to b= e > hotpluggable anyway. setuid is bad, use consolekit2 as described below] > > The good (but a bit involved for now) fix: > > - run 'sysctl kern.evdev.input' to make sure you have a recent enough > kernel -- my patch for this is not in 12.0-RELEASE, but should be in > 12.1-BETA I'm pretty sure > - build libudev-devd with > https://github.com/myfreeweb/freebsd-ports-dank/blob/lite/devel/libudev-d= evd/Makefile > (i.e. update to the latest git commit) > - build consolekit2 with https://reviews.freebsd.org/D18754 > - build wlroots with CONSOLEKIT option > - enable automatic CK2 session creation on login: add 'session > optional pam_ck_connector.so' to the '# session' section of > /etc/pam.d/login > - log out, log in, just run sway > - (you can launch sway under ck-launch-session if the automatic session > gets screwed up somehow, but it works for me pretty well) > > The bad (but quick) fix: > > - chmod/chown /dev/input/* to be accessible to your account > - (there's some devfs config thing that can do this automatically) > - (this exposes input devices to any program running as your account, > which defeats the "no keyloggers allowed" advantage of wayland) > From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Sat Oct 5 20:35:18 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A54313C552 for ; Sat, 5 Oct 2019 20:35:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from raichoo@acmelabs.space) Received: from mail.acmelabs.space (acmelabs.space [185.244.195.243]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46lz5K4Mg7z461V for ; Sat, 5 Oct 2019 20:35:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from raichoo@acmelabs.space) Received: from lain.fritz.box (dslb-188-100-249-041.188.100.pools.vodafone-ip.de [188.100.249.41]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.acmelabs.space (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 71A80347A for ; Sat, 5 Oct 2019 20:35:15 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=acmelabs.space; s=dkim; t=1570307715; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=u/K8L0IxE7+MD/WhV/ZPffwYvAQuJjOxSuP8Qp/VdPA=; b=rdLly+FaRjftFHtMOf/GiZo8EBa0nVLIC7JUqDE6IEDIJecRZNnsxphcgW+2j8vHk5fPZ9 LvZTRNAMgAnqlUCNAZbth8ZVBFvo9eG93EbSq9ryCkYLQLp9UiUluFXrzdaicZtCLiLhm4 0rkPPnX6D2QMXPkF+l4SDzAer92zDYc= Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2019 22:35:16 +0200 From: raichoo To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Xwayland bug when using multiple screens Message-ID: <20191005203516.GA19159@lain.fritz.box> References: <20191005150931.GA22049@lain.fritz.box> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="M9NhX3UHpAaciwkO" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20191005150931.GA22049@lain.fritz.box> User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.2 (2019-09-21) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46lz5K4Mg7z461V X-Spamd-Bar: ++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=acmelabs.space header.s=dkim header.b=rdLly+Fa; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of raichoo@acmelabs.space has no SPF policy when checking 185.244.195.243) smtp.mailfrom=raichoo@acmelabs.space X-Spamd-Result: default: False [2.14 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[acmelabs.space:s=dkim]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; HAS_ATTACHMENT(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-x11@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/mixed,text/plain]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.61)[0.610,0]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[acmelabs.space]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[acmelabs.space:+]; CTYPE_MIXED_BOGUS(1.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.40)[0.404,0]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:+]; IP_SCORE(0.42)[asn: 197540(2.13), country: DE(-0.01)]; ASN(0.00)[asn:197540, ipnet:185.244.192.0/22, country:DE]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[41.249.100.188.khpj7ygk5idzvmvt5x4ziurxhy.zen.dq.spamhaus.net : 127.0.0.11] X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Oct 2019 20:35:18 -0000 --M9NhX3UHpAaciwkO Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Sat, Oct 05, 2019 at 05:09:31PM +0200, raichoo wrote: > > Anyone else having that problem as well? > Turns out this was a false alert. And it was fixed with newer versions of sway. Kind regards, raichoo --M9NhX3UHpAaciwkO Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="raichoo@acmelabs.space.gpg.asc" -----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- mQINBFxxaJsBEADQmuIyVv+mSAwNNEP3nfkz98Sz5xuC4yU8D3jsPRWLIeEnq1r6 MxjwFcJVpM1A7Q5s9Hy+j6FHTfBdYarG7jNsH85renUSbFrtBcYng7BgRyKAuYCb pKBx3hNVEjXjZN7FvGUYt4cC9UEiTaSOCqG1vuwMLTnVBB0TCvQaSRGk5jNDd0Q0 +IyWW7nYtamqk47VpBpzm25t1TecWik9MtT44IRq6X1CS6VQNp/w89vv5dv0raBf rRhz9tjoPie1ubBFwyL7m5o28lUwXxRRymlMwd0eMCcRcghGqa9qQDZuTUTkt/D7 53lqLqPrguU+wgkopZGry4nVt8Td5UDMoLSTfYnuGznDKBSPeRGgzzdsw1Bf4Adj 6v2ZFTF3Me8hHHwhhXpY1chIY+R7eUZ6M5Mmwl3Aq5qppfxtnvRAh+EqvB7+379r +e1HWFI/6HU5YTIqqGZP2KUO9geNqaM2arSVqMe78SAvcPDzohhUuuH/jsk70EOF qaDH4XvHOq9I9L3FxqKBn1N6ACz4PMl6y9bBIgEAyGgj8K7JzYiGFO2K3KD8OREs RZHmPLBMLCo0ubHhbCD/F18DpEt0f91yHAHCdvfnbq6XjvqJXi77l404tv2G48os ZkK7ySiJuRj3eL4MuNRoipD4LgjH96Vk6dGz/f9c1wxoLArDeZ8HIGZ4MwARAQAB tCByYWljaG9vIDxyYWljaG9vQGFjbWVsYWJzLnNwYWNlPokCVAQTAQgAPhYhBCca wIfbaYxkK6g55RY25bHFTCgfBQJccWibAhsDBQkDwmcABQsJCAcCBhUKCQgLAgQW AgMBAh4BAheAAAoJEBY25bHFTCgfPqUP/jA1xKKKeUW7ovATMKmVDPJiwsJrLBRw 4e7Q4brbxbAQ2/qdmCIy8gxsKmayyFYUtwK6MsQA1JN/hKjWIE/hi6DA3Q1M5BwE hthyEZm6RBtQWQfPZ4Mwi+daG/9JJc0M+ZKpZbyh7DXD81stLC1mZyXMl8D+MqWn /GmZO7o4x6eDXxIvPUViGXSU8vL3lLScj2+Uvc7fS4AlQnpZP3MQ7tqUfOca4bGO 83DYCRlc8GXb1WvDH9Nab2dnbXnH1urk9d2Wla940txwZqXb5w/87uvn5dp+kt03 c3IBQJy6jWFMMaPG5W5MVw60Cx8KvD8j3XTjM2w6PSc6lauJpfzwAKkrLR12JjBK wkyIaJ+1/VAg1OthR6RkMGAZe5J2p7K5XcXUXa5hnnU7Kbk7E3d6sDY3VRx98849 5XzV1jkcuQhkQB5Z0XDQOJP27THTSgx94iK5TD7LDgVJgxYpDAeV0fsHBUeRUa7W u7CGe/h60ENGzw4IZLmvj8iAFZAfPsxI10kyaLx6Jh4pjv5nSj5Fhk+p+JuPl928 OwUtkaG9gvv7S8lzberMNYM31BqXVb+A6GGiAxdUfazwkW22UPrFtQtejycVXpUN CqA0pgyqOtPrEA70tdD/5R4LNORHHZ6VK6LeZTt9p6ZWYhStLcTO9r3HBAGrRwe+ bu8oMLgXfQxhuQINBFxxaJsBEAClF6yLrtkuuDWC2psQP1ppViFy/FYxGP32nYXV AwnT1U0tCLi8shF9CYg7rpcY3fEfqQBhVGgkYrPIo7WqjWCfMVqJhhU0NMuOWSqf npyqGhCGTjdtY/j93eHPL/sTpfGYmI59r5GkG0+cyBwK3lrmT9bQeRPbOxSpHsSf aqUb0iWhHUqvU5+y5d1zkNIXxTKNXjtK4+cvud4SOH1RBZhDxOEB+jtIQpx3a2rg mMFb1pMD/NJ2wmoyUNEgxlTCG2zxHuLPZUz6y4xJtGZUKaC12rr2u0JAaxrNWMiU yPI6BadT6h1LyA3pROe8ZKEPGnDjXg5P9hZFtIzx/b/iglmEeO0U/AuP62QpN1q2 l0wJ+mvxD/iCMPVkRrCQ2300Ym2Nk2aNXqsFdeaeVVspUbu0l6sWBXt5g+BCmdsv DwX1bwJ4s/ZKOeu5yRGmNDuAg3lIBT+sRiFQKsPchqFZBDv8Q5oB4WBkRpaCc8mF TX/7RiCIw/A6ucBby+SKflpOhOAjD0H3tPreJTxdhSFTVUgU0CausR4ckBCvJWAa KQLm+vInTr94bDG1GHoNbioj9sa2h0S7ZxAsGs7AFRykkdoW/ij4HHpANveQd6Ws acpKuPm74ajeZ7hMN/Ur/tVfeM6MqfBNQpHt5gJ9P6xMCBKT/PUo/+0oISiU3pdT FWiPGwARAQABiQI8BBgBCAAmFiEEJxrAh9tpjGQrqDnlFjblscVMKB8FAlxxaJsC GwwFCQPCZwAACgkQFjblscVMKB/g+A//WvSMLgKWQEmY4T7y0ybmtkhW4vHSu58o YY7SqlejwoRvJgeqvlIq50sQVCapUMOCt6KN3YWH9JW8Z7hmEji2wNlz7koZEeTk EGb+6430/snDlylUxsltNyU0giterNFtTXP+UXQbtjveXCCBSqSkbbM5x/ZsJSGn MSQz/HCS60zigPbkKCUztlpN/pGCR1/KFUBPoPY5Yoazf7W5vrMUHKjH8sRRQ3TL UBL81TUze4Eg6+d5Vymw+21ufNLgPy4/tg2sd8TPnIASFmH8u+d6cM8kRAdfrYII 46cQ8yfP5m+G2EBBeaZsiQUZwcRy385NSUrQQtk9zQbR0TOh3gXLtlPKMj1aFl32 0nAzRtK4oOktte6n17B0NXjPIOKxz4j6yKDzQi5kFEqhCd8ziZk+o12B989hTpwx HZPmiymNrj1o8eRpcj09ZqQ0kVWt9WHSA6N5vkP6WH2mUkBaIDp5T2raLIO8Ddhx KtBxaQ5EsThQrRgaOHsjl5EXn8m4QolkYZTs10xopSLwSDWit39uPXwr9sNKwnJn +zbdnCmJ5S7F13PKOQe3OC4hokkWxcQ8WVPiJjnbakn1Yy7jtKg1psoUA41vGrt/ 2MDG1ZDrBqO6QJ9FuYAaEH50OZiNympimhy8BqUThN/qDb8mADGxNPcZ9/mS5AR7 o4kTuD+uxAg= =yh5q -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- --M9NhX3UHpAaciwkO--