From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Sun Sep 6 04:17:19 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A14863E0489 for ; Sun, 6 Sep 2020 04:17:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marklmi@yahoo.com) Received: from sonic314-21.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (sonic314-21.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com [98.137.69.84]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BkdRL3sJMz4PYF for ; Sun, 6 Sep 2020 04:17:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marklmi@yahoo.com) X-YMail-OSG: R2eOoIsVM1kivQMLaDpnLorLr8eRffvUptH0TbLNLGck0IZq_UDEOCgxmtjPgzD hgvhCx7XHgDDJN.zinSZp3MxjofO9jko4UOdpkl6BDhaZ1NQWemesdMRj03Irr8ik0RfsXB8Ovsw s3d0QPTOF98q.Y8VOIWDXEFHQDbVNSWTJCMKXamODeXM.REhpvkMxpNGiLwfYUtWY5POFfGaUqH2 7mbmUBMdZMU64fSZq8jEOJMFUkMDfzxpKo6rhPNu_FwRRliZOY5LrzTOxOEgm0GT3_fEcyJgfv8j uhL6bdmEnQ.hPxU7xXk3Ph4jgY9OhWwriPpCMJmi2y8M2h.Cr0KsU97JSxilJYjDjb6N.9K_un8_ MVWDK1ukVmBrz9EmXv5FsA3MjFxLqlvSx7DcBA65HoNRak1vZVimZ0e4um6cIjNSClOj.IX.wAIF 1QAO5HJi.QVYN9AOLUjIbVhWWHiVU1s0yv48Kc_RVEboxaIMGB.xFuIu4s_ccEWjI3_yDExz_A58 I0r1lmCoSvYZ8W4Sls7UH3RMSohossJ763kFIs5gzmhBF_dZPH9iU5.S2xlEl_Z4LxfVm0kiCwYC wOUf0eleuc26uX76jwmFtVp36lVqf7I.OOXwTXE1VzWZLWMxUIt68.vXtH9a3gBroyEcgoQPeI_G SAeTZ7bJr4X6Ses_vj5eU4X8iJt.XO0ZA1SNWmDU_cPOzlOJO42jZplPO33ST4lXP1K7rQT2d2AT .9NXKx5bdoRSR2J0NaAOsUmHYPvaY0n8YRCLd1QjxWSY7cFkFrU2ra3GH7wwvQH3.MlYEFNsnbBD 8lKiwMyQOHKhxX1Xqp.UJ9hJvjx5LyIG.EGrPuhLWdrAa3sFarO1sHM82uPvqgIMssnC9cDcQ3kE Ic_xTbbz5_j9A6ldjdquKOnUstG.e4Y_t1jBWMroC7AuKxcyE2YuJJYll3PkqvW3R_RqFrSJf5Vq 7VKWXsQiussdCGAWzCSqIcnna.K9VmaoXedlp8LiNwaDhTWCutVCd27hsh61FAQg7JkkJjAEXSXR T9PMkTs15sM2beDK.olPdUoydZpgd1njr3bsKeR0UJ_j7SsLGI9G3nqvv9yhDa1_gTlg9YZ6yV4l DdjHf7_D1hyowUCHwIVnt6HkpWDUgz6EAuiYmnnX0SoHgoXeARUDofHhu0qvQaOYo76o9u1QGZ1a bOtBtqIPUS5X2jThSy4DzIM_W6mfrSMDqlbQjk5BcB1rjvuPdQ1cXZVG1yOgLqtU0P_zlBAvw4Wr 3leZP50aEZFnauewvpi2BKPXqWE6tZfo.YvAV5j9QglGiioLHJ56mvkZUOMvMVUYhy1fTDH7wxC6 vHZFWkK7gilevjWklFvjTzq7T0.FgAhhSKgxq5YWKBvwu2YwGhOHTq6ciEU59q.Ahs.Pb1aujlTm 8Zg6jIC1VHtjD3OYweAPGYRpJSn1PT1a.F26msOwqpCkZ3p0fmXtML11VGOofXLGpdBfoYf5G4SH dqdCeEmyxSJAGBIUGPEx0ZxCQFIxgme8C..j9ssN8vj5Q1Ov5_Ufjj.vVvS5WKsvOBshclm2Hbfp pP8dsdHbm6IZB.NJk1EsfOHzkUnHrAlUl Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic314.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with HTTP; Sun, 6 Sep 2020 04:17:16 +0000 Received: by smtp410.mail.bf1.yahoo.com (VZM Hermes SMTP Server) with ESMTPA ID f723f8ceb3b1cde6c4597a4c26c80758; Sun, 06 Sep 2020 04:17:12 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.1\)) Subject: Re: onboard wireless on rpi4 From: Mark Millard In-Reply-To: Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2020 21:17:10 -0700 Cc: freebsd-arm Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <8037E5D3-E89E-4AED-8FFE-43D9D83B2BD3@yahoo.com> References: <20200904134619.GB80905@bastion.zyxst.net> <69934262-D9D3-4986-849D-9E8221D1E387@kronometrix.org> <20200904142255.GC80905@bastion.zyxst.net> <5AF83D16-2432-4EA9-BC2F-373DA8BC3360@googlemail.com> <4306A90D-97B9-4DE9-A05A-A91B6F4A587F@yahoo.com> To: Robert Crowston X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.1) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BkdRL3sJMz4PYF X-Spamd-Bar: --- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.50 / 15.00]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[yahoo.com]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ptr:yahoo.com]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[yahoo.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[yahoo.com,reject]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.93)[-0.934]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[protonmail.com]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[yahoo.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:36647, ipnet:98.137.64.0/20, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[yahoo.com:dkim]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.07)[-1.068]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[yahoo.com:s=s2048]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.003]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[98.137.69.84:from]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[98.137.69.84:from]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-arm] X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Sep 2020 04:17:19 -0000 On 2020-Sep-5, at 01:59, Robert Crowston = wrote: > Regrettably the DMA problem is not fixed. After fixing the bus tag to = correctly represent the DMA limit of the device, it reduced the problem = incidence a lot but sometimes it still happens when the controller is = under load. I think to do with the inbound/outbound memory view on the = controller, i.e. maybe there is crosstalk between inbound and outbound = DMA? I can submit the patch I have but it=E2=80=99s not a 100% fix. >=20 > Did someone tell me this is *not* a problem at all on NetBSD/OpenBSD? Of the two contexts that you mention, I've only used the NetBSD context. Summary for NetBSD: I've never observed evidence of a DMA problem under NetBSD. I just tried making a duplicate of a huge file (11570948096 B) on the USB3 SSD and then diff'ing the result: no differences on a 4 GiByte RPI4B and none on a 8 GiByte RPi4B. (Not that I know the type of test is sufficiently analogous across operating systems to make solid conclusions.) Context: Same RPi4B's that I use with the FreeBSD USB3 SSD, distinct media for NetBSD. Same NetBSD media used for the 8 GiByte RPI4B used and the 4 GiByte RPi4B used. Same vintage uefi/ACPI as used with FreeBSD, but with the 3072 MiB limitation disabled. NetBSD does report the larger RAM sizes. Same type of USB3 SSD as is used for FreeBSD. No microsd card involved in operating the RPi4B, just like for FreeBSD. Use of over_voltage=3D6 and arm_freq=3D2000, like for FreeBSD. And so on: close match (other than the operating systems). Mark > =E2=80=94 RHC. >=20 > On Fri, Sep 4, 2020 at 20:19, Mark Millard via freebsd-arm = wrote: >>=20 >>=20 >> On 2020-Sep-4, at 10:44, Klaus Cucinauomo wrote: >> > >> > Hi Mark, >>=20 >> Hello. >>=20 >> > as far as I remember(didn=E2=80=99t work the last weeks on = RPI-stuff) >> > the dma-thing only failed on GENERIC-NODEBUG (unexpected controller = detection loops) =E2=80=A6 >>=20 >> Unless trying to help track down a problem at the time, I use NODBG >> kernels. So, for > 3072 MiB, I find that copying huge files and >> diffing/cmp'ing the copies reports mismatches. (I tend to use >> files larger than the RAM but that large has not been required.) >> Note: I boot from and use USB3 SSD without a microsd card being >> involved at any stage. >>=20 >> It is not obvious what the actual file contents are where the >> differences show up. >>=20 >> I've tended to create and use tar's of build trees, created under >> the 3072 MiB configuration to establish large files for such >> tests. Tests under the 3072 MiB configuration have not failed >> when I've tried such. >>=20 >> I have not tried this kind of test under a DBG kernel. >>=20 >> The last I heard about the PCIe DMA handling for > 3072 MiB was >> on 2020-Jul-19 from Robert Crowston: >>=20 >> QUOTE >> You are right that we are not handling the 3 GB DMA limit in the pcie = driver. Unfortunately, it did not seem easy to thread the appropriate = bus tag through without rewriting half the inherited driver stack, and = in my testing the USB driver always allocated its DMA buffers in the = lower 3 GB without being told. But obviously it is the wrong to rely on = luck, so I=E2=80=99ll have a think about it. >> END QUOTE >>=20 >> I've not noticed anything go by that suggested to me that this >> has been addressed. (But I could have just missed it.) >>=20 >> > But it worked on GENERIC and afaik Greg_unrelenting`s dma-fix = isn=E2=80=99t yet merged to 13-current >> > because of that unfixed issue=E2=80=A6 >> > (but you can apply his patch and test)..it should work under = GENERIC without the 3GB-limit(4GB & 8GB-models) >> > >> > Klaus >> > >> >> Am 04.09.2020 um 19:33 schrieb Mark Millard via freebsd-arm = : >> >>> >> >> >> >> Has the mishandling of the DMA been fixed? I'm still back >> >> at head -r363590 and it was not fixed as of then. I've >> >> had to use the 3072 MiB limit in the uefi/ACPI selections >> >> in order to have a reliable environment. >> >> >> > >=20 =3D=3D=3D Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away in early 2018-Mar) From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Sun Sep 6 04:40:53 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE53E3E05BB for ; Sun, 6 Sep 2020 04:40:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wlosh@bsdimp.com) Received: from mail-qk1-x743.google.com (mail-qk1-x743.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::743]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BkdyX4vVrz4Q12 for ; Sun, 6 Sep 2020 04:40:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wlosh@bsdimp.com) Received: by mail-qk1-x743.google.com with SMTP id 16so804211qkf.4 for ; Sat, 05 Sep 2020 21:40:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bsdimp-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=hcrKt9pIDS6w92BSMYs8yczvv7mh8KjRsljWPCNR/Xc=; b=W8PJ0Fh7vw46hf4P4yKI8FpGo4iNXBdwhLjJVfuOkouge/7Y+vnzIphXo5/k26eNF+ PiyxpcGZXJ+Svvjz4SSjMmcdyKuAwKv/1BEWVnAQbruIoZ/XBU74FHj5wi3bsBpshqC6 1pbfiJzhS3z1AKv6QtvAvtEW61d9g6aZ8dl/HmZwasCuT9RJlGNd6nynmL5fqnE22cI7 D1mzmDIUkqIcZX1qaNXFscqAalorBZQ9a1TjWfIqdoKy37YGCfl55NNK03Jrdw6CPNZo 8G6CgRq2lbRvn6/Zp0smPcBnchVZGD4qdxjwksOMxrVh2R91oowDeSaeuwY+bMfdczCZ omQQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=hcrKt9pIDS6w92BSMYs8yczvv7mh8KjRsljWPCNR/Xc=; b=t7FPfqBp3dGNI53EE45YM+6Xz4SM92knFWWYvhdqNDzH1R5DNmJNigxWoEDsdaTNgu kVr9L47IHcazZKv+lkVpO47hd0wVnb4iqyq2HyKboyfBKnGgn4i6y0UFd/W/x0J9x/Mn HjiPfLAVMeRFK9twghWwebf3mslG8UIP/R+GUdHkYhYLLNI+B7fDMD8bCOJ3d7/Or6j1 pKnPIVucwLW/RNVC6YaO77topZcLEdBfgfEahWMaMmKn/qOcnDahAGg4gBQLqJHmaVvH IJHeuveBn4ut7OFUNV0dU1cOxNHn3zfpFUbma0AwO3lksmQnhxBG815W7TfaehIl8Yg0 dO/A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5318dsIbfKU6YAO7s8AgGzZB+TixOXVqEerbQ3Egn+FuOZd/7gHK 97HtDI8o2ur8rxfG51obrOlVLSH+UrXydq0OUP0C4A== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzNH+3gcVxFCfThNNgz5XBpsciC3ceoPgL3IZ0RHk9POrIBdZi55l9B1CPbwCXSmg16IScBkt2sYpe0O8YPYvo= X-Received: by 2002:a37:638d:: with SMTP id x135mr14657390qkb.60.1599367251439; Sat, 05 Sep 2020 21:40:51 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200904134619.GB80905@bastion.zyxst.net> <69934262-D9D3-4986-849D-9E8221D1E387@kronometrix.org> <20200904142255.GC80905@bastion.zyxst.net> <5AF83D16-2432-4EA9-BC2F-373DA8BC3360@googlemail.com> <4306A90D-97B9-4DE9-A05A-A91B6F4A587F@yahoo.com> <8037E5D3-E89E-4AED-8FFE-43D9D83B2BD3@yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <8037E5D3-E89E-4AED-8FFE-43D9D83B2BD3@yahoo.com> From: Warner Losh Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2020 22:40:38 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: onboard wireless on rpi4 To: Mark Millard Cc: Robert Crowston , freebsd-arm X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BkdyX4vVrz4Q12 X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=bsdimp-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=W8PJ0Fh7; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of wlosh@bsdimp.com has no SPF policy when checking 2607:f8b0:4864:20::743) smtp.mailfrom=wlosh@bsdimp.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.37 / 15.00]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_CC(0.00)[protonmail.com,freebsd.org]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[bsdimp-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com:s=20150623]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.04)[-1.036]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.95)[-0.950]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-arm@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[bsdimp.com]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[bsdimp-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com:+]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.38)[-0.381]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::743:from]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[yahoo.com]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[imp@bsdimp.com,wlosh@bsdimp.com]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[imp@bsdimp.com,wlosh@bsdimp.com]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-arm] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.33 X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Sep 2020 04:40:53 -0000 On Sat, Sep 5, 2020, 10:17 PM Mark Millard via freebsd-arm < freebsd-arm@freebsd.org> wrote: > > > On 2020-Sep-5, at 01:59, Robert Crowston > wrote: > > > Regrettably the DMA problem is not fixed. After fixing the bus tag to > correctly represent the DMA limit of the device, it reduced the problem > incidence a lot but sometimes it still happens when the controller is und= er > load. I think to do with the inbound/outbound memory view on the > controller, i.e. maybe there is crosstalk between inbound and outbound DM= A? > I can submit the patch I have but it=E2=80=99s not a 100% fix. > > > > Did someone tell me this is *not* a problem at all on NetBSD/OpenBSD? > > Of the two contexts that you mention, I've only used the NetBSD context. > > Summary for NetBSD: I've never observed evidence of a DMA problem under > NetBSD. I just tried making a duplicate of a huge file (11570948096 B) > on the USB3 SSD and then diff'ing the result: no differences on a 4 > GiByte RPI4B and none on a 8 GiByte RPi4B. (Not that I know the type of > test is sufficiently analogous across operating systems to make solid > conclusions.) > > Context: > > Same RPi4B's that I use with the FreeBSD USB3 SSD, distinct media > for NetBSD. Same NetBSD media used for the 8 GiByte RPI4B used and the > 4 GiByte RPi4B used. > > Same vintage uefi/ACPI as used with FreeBSD, but with the 3072 MiB > limitation disabled. NetBSD does report the larger RAM sizes. > > Same type of USB3 SSD as is used for FreeBSD. No microsd card > involved in operating the RPi4B, just like for FreeBSD. > > Use of over_voltage=3D6 and arm_freq=3D2000, like for FreeBSD. > > And so on: close match (other than the operating systems). > I thought I read they added the busdma constraints we are missing... Warner > Mark > > > =E2=80=94 RHC. > > > > On Fri, Sep 4, 2020 at 20:19, Mark Millard via freebsd-arm < > freebsd-arm@freebsd.org> wrote: > >> > >> > >> On 2020-Sep-4, at 10:44, Klaus Cucinauomo > wrote: > >> > > >> > Hi Mark, > >> > >> Hello. > >> > >> > as far as I remember(didn=E2=80=99t work the last weeks on RPI-stuff= ) > >> > the dma-thing only failed on GENERIC-NODEBUG (unexpected controller > detection loops) =E2=80=A6 > >> > >> Unless trying to help track down a problem at the time, I use NODBG > >> kernels. So, for > 3072 MiB, I find that copying huge files and > >> diffing/cmp'ing the copies reports mismatches. (I tend to use > >> files larger than the RAM but that large has not been required.) > >> Note: I boot from and use USB3 SSD without a microsd card being > >> involved at any stage. > >> > >> It is not obvious what the actual file contents are where the > >> differences show up. > >> > >> I've tended to create and use tar's of build trees, created under > >> the 3072 MiB configuration to establish large files for such > >> tests. Tests under the 3072 MiB configuration have not failed > >> when I've tried such. > >> > >> I have not tried this kind of test under a DBG kernel. > >> > >> The last I heard about the PCIe DMA handling for > 3072 MiB was > >> on 2020-Jul-19 from Robert Crowston: > >> > >> QUOTE > >> You are right that we are not handling the 3 GB DMA limit in the pcie > driver. Unfortunately, it did not seem easy to thread the appropriate bus > tag through without rewriting half the inherited driver stack, and in my > testing the USB driver always allocated its DMA buffers in the lower 3 GB > without being told. But obviously it is the wrong to rely on luck, so I= =E2=80=99ll > have a think about it. > >> END QUOTE > >> > >> I've not noticed anything go by that suggested to me that this > >> has been addressed. (But I could have just missed it.) > >> > >> > But it worked on GENERIC and afaik Greg_unrelenting`s dma-fix isn=E2= =80=99t > yet merged to 13-current > >> > because of that unfixed issue=E2=80=A6 > >> > (but you can apply his patch and test)..it should work under GENERIC > without the 3GB-limit(4GB & 8GB-models) > >> > > >> > Klaus > >> > > >> >> Am 04.09.2020 um 19:33 schrieb Mark Millard via freebsd-arm < > freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>: > >> >>> > >> >> > >> >> Has the mishandling of the DMA been fixed? I'm still back > >> >> at head -r363590 and it was not fixed as of then. I've > >> >> had to use the 3072 MiB limit in the uefi/ACPI selections > >> >> in order to have a reliable environment. > >> >> > >> > > > > > > > =3D=3D=3D > Mark Millard > marklmi at yahoo.com > ( dsl-only.net went > away in early 2018-Mar) > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-arm@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arm-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Sun Sep 6 09:09:04 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC4033CB5D2 for ; Sun, 6 Sep 2020 09:09:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marklmi@yahoo.com) Received: from sonic307-54.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (sonic307-54.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com [98.137.64.30]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Bklw00flMz4f5l for ; Sun, 6 Sep 2020 09:09:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marklmi@yahoo.com) X-YMail-OSG: 0Z9W0v4VM1kiWJlnFFeQ8FfNoBtPCxjd3Q7f2Bsdt_hY4NoZGrqpW7upP9f9RtM hoIKrQ9IMlU_l_eVErSPvDvwha3vRalJQi5oxZ6hkp.lhJy8cQTo.j9JJtOFK5bBCAn5KfQ0GJVD 6qRSsv3S2U2wMBJ9QZqIolURytYKuz8ZPHIKe7XEssBCH58_tXC3hcY1VXDLiNuhOt0_EHWJ2FMr KA0nsKRTKcyFSv7jQr6kle0LeN.JC.smSK1FVrSjVRh5bQA_DRt_Fcx70XlG5N8OKr6qg0UGNIQd 5zCjtz2NG5zePoJVK7Ed31GfkiHBrlseViF3JVMqNuW0frQLT6a1xcu.QFEWLXdksiBBQwrsPcUx 0L16J1qa7NrEf.egpwZwtClFz3z6U04k.3nrpz9L3mrTWm9sEXnm6RHPobWlt7NSe7luEV66KBUu Qj5NlA2GF0OUeTqGbd5ouTSywaeQHeEkz2B4ecyrwAsk8Enr.nzf7glLbcBCM0C6aJf8vKoQM08G kIBh_1kra4kyt2Cxw_7.MOyDnNqrKj0lbqJqC_pNU.mr3.Ir1I6M0LXrYqWSCZEyzQUe.Q1dO__i frmlTtxebXpPNzADQ3vuxElBYK41DD6rD0MS63F490z5IDRTVsW6dviwWcFXK2WD9CiGMg.mzVzN aJY2KWs3YOfh2D2ZY_2aH8UQnMU6Ezso7IQYzf8O2TQF5T2QEBDfts23SE1fXByRY6UvhHSisjSR KPfqsBqEb7rH5YG1aKsDELnoTHJOLht4EarPlLO_9LcUsbFLo7M5XwGXsCx3AtwFylU5cwKhMjx8 wm_7lXoN6wG4RiACSiASSr4_QdY_nDDsEQdk_oaFdp_NF9rTkX58wXS4EAzLZ_1Ex1oFR6kdqPYU dhdz_gqiH8SngccyhWNU5mSDQlypOCxafEBanY9.B6PlOe1A8PNw2UCq1NPXG.GXRTu.ZzdAUW.M AsuvYlwkoV97RTL2pWO0ImEix9WOI1FdEmgnnfmfy2gVxVnLAasbu17.RFBvw0E1XPqb6QxKYgon 93UIsksQwvZWD6wNa9C_MFlE20m7xG.aY04CXNUCiAEBUFAkr5AcuA_UG46ycyDuQLI8mQk7iiIQ tUK9Z.Wv1VXhxSL0hVD1AKj7y_D3enJe_TSrfqhU0WUvhe0VbrypRuvp2bDejwulwEXDZh_8FDWR JyjoG.s8TCWyHBTQaC0nC7o95tzYIisaP7iKb25zcqChw14yuPgHYtnjevJQrqxRjUtKh5vU4xzn MGIpnjG7nCalZ8Rl_iguXtzS6I2qDrdnC02ANJWDARJaMr8Sf4HmJk3H98zWjqtN7PpmDyPaRMIQ ljmymzD0V.QQg4BdtZAUEDOwA_B8IOltn611tYZ6Jz2mYec3k3pmPbhR2hLHUpWq_2JuGjQyuzdg 4FqkhBB0B8PsyeVBAkN_WAN5QAnbuSxFodslvLDCR1pRR.JDA9x3V3zJ1XHtJk9LAADUmW.MDtZN FP_JVNEg8A_Zilegk6kyGOkLYSa0nqUHZS8.qdgiB7P9zjx0Y4Uoa0i8qzXHNu75f3K7w3bhNFKK GRA-- Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic307.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with HTTP; Sun, 6 Sep 2020 09:09:02 +0000 Received: by smtp424.mail.bf1.yahoo.com (VZM Hermes SMTP Server) with ESMTPA ID b60160faac57bc21b2607ead1951efbc; Sun, 06 Sep 2020 09:08:57 +0000 (UTC) From: Mark Millard Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.1\)) Subject: Re: Plans for git (was: Please check the current beta git conversions) Message-Id: <719DD13F-E6B4-4742-ADA3-5CA5162C9FEC@yahoo.com> Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2020 02:08:55 -0700 To: freebsd-arm , Warner Losh X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.1) References: <719DD13F-E6B4-4742-ADA3-5CA5162C9FEC.ref@yahoo.com> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Bklw00flMz4f5l X-Spamd-Bar: --- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.96 / 15.00]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[yahoo.com]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ptr:yahoo.com]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[yahoo.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[yahoo.com,reject]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.39)[-1.389]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[yahoo.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:36647, ipnet:98.137.64.0/20, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[yahoo.com:dkim]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.07)[-1.072]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[yahoo.com:s=s2048]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.003]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[98.137.64.30:from]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[98.137.64.30:from]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-arm] X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Sep 2020 09:09:05 -0000 Warner Losh imp at bsdimp.com wrote on Sat Sep 5 16:57:41 UTC 2020 : > On Fri, Sep 04, 2020 at 10:59:18PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote: > > > > I have this out for review. > > > > https://hackmd.io/hJgnfzd5TMK-VHgUzshA2g > > Note 0: The part about using 'git stash' and 'git stash apply' does not present anything to drop the top of the stash. I suffered this recently and ended up with a much latter accidental reapply of an older, already applied stash. I had a long list of stashes to clean out of things that already had been applied earlier. (It was not a FreeBSD repository.) 'git stash pop' does the apply then a drop (success case). Otherwise a separate 'git stash drop' gets rid of the top stash when you no longer need it. Note 1: QUOTE You saw them above in the conflict when it said it couldn=E2=80=99t = apply =E2=80=9C646e0f9cda11=E2=80=9D END QUOTE The 646e0f9cda11 material/conflict is actually later/below in the = document. Note 2: QUOTE This method is suitable when you have tiny tweaks to the tree. When you = have anything non trivial, you=E2=80=99ll likely be better off keeping a = local branch and rebasing. It is also integreated with the =E2=80=98git = pull=E2=80=99 command: just add =E2=80=98=E2=80=93autostash=E2=80=99 to = the command line. END QUOTE The "It is" from the 3rd sentence of the paragraph does not refer to material from the 2nd sentence but to material from the 1st sentence. I'd expect that sentences 2 and 3 should be swapped. "integreated" has a typo. =3D=3D=3D Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away in early 2018-Mar) From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Sun Sep 6 12:32:02 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1BCE3D0033 for ; Sun, 6 Sep 2020 12:32:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tech-lists@zyxst.net) Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BkrQ94v50z3ZPL for ; Sun, 6 Sep 2020 12:32:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tech-lists@zyxst.net) Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6A9C5C00D3 for ; Sun, 6 Sep 2020 08:32:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 06 Sep 2020 08:32:00 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zyxst.net; h= date:from:to:subject:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s= fm3; bh=L738dp8sMa3t1O59/Db8dvA3IgaGFR7fUROFpRAlneQ=; b=QqS2W/wg lkDu8BUxlkje6SLR5f7P+C09+2qRljSx3VwL1E46D447PDdiinrA+qtXcGsmU8c2 rnCBm96DIayAhivnTx2Q5n9IbRUhLhRobJED9JJ1l56BQ/a8eq/JJ8Rwt+tgOmoJ 75xGNr+N52c4EOJwTpckylkaLD/u9CHP27rYV/7YH4B9WSw3xVMQn1FXSZhxJFG4 ve7iqQj8LWJleUuFZg7G+1V1wEigoFyiiJdtaPlNfWoJXa/NbNxdQ3xyeM0EJdHL kdFzU4SdNl3um2p9xZvfLzFrB7n2nktkZJWJyheyO+u72Jx20KxQrYsfZSiBj8Gm wFpLlZSftTlboQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:message-id :mime-version:subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=L738dp8sMa3t1O59/Db8dvA3IgaGF R7fUROFpRAlneQ=; b=XHP3OT0iuTIr/p+WZydW+Axux2Iqqa2D2fpbywHOIt9j5 pOSW6Xv1rWHWTg55JLeAfu/bFu1WmI91ff30eqt3+wreeLaXJokgs7Dzb5PC9b41 NNPeXWApYb1Y6CStADVFuSyKaZ7t8VNQb7Km+ErXoqpmYBxdFnd1haDWz0oDaqgC rSTXcjTcqPy0UHKNygU7nOiNsTbO54nYjW5MlN0yPJD13BaRzcHRfx5Js/K2FH62 FlGXClcX0vXLb+0CZJqyrw8udfjEtWbWF5m2ELXjXW9TaOI0KlA4qT+aOjeRqWzR vbUhMarRYvgDDzM/ZhRJf5FT1YSJ2pmdES/vdC9nw== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduiedrudegjedgheegucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpeffhffvuffkgggtugesghdtreertd dtvdenucfhrhhomhepthgvtghhqdhlihhsthhsuceothgvtghhqdhlihhsthhsseiihiig shhtrdhnvghtqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeeiffffteevvddthffhhfffhefhgeegvd euveegteetgeetfeejfeefuefhvddtleenucffohhmrghinheprghmrgiiohhnrdgtohdr uhhknecukfhppeekvddrjedtrdeluddrleelnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenuc frrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthgvtghhqdhlihhsthhsseiihiigshhtrdhnvght X-ME-Proxy: Received: from bastion.zyxst.net (bastion.zyxst.net [82.70.91.99]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 100B13064610 for ; Sun, 6 Sep 2020 08:31:59 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2020 13:31:30 +0100 From: tech-lists To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: how to capture kernel panic on headless rpii4? Message-ID: <20200906123130.GA82216@bastion.zyxst.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="mP3DRpeJDSE+ciuQ" Content-Disposition: inline X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BkrQ94v50z3ZPL X-Spamd-Bar: ----- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=zyxst.net header.s=fm3 header.b=QqS2W/wg; dkim=pass header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm3 header.b=XHP3OT0i; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of tech-lists@zyxst.net designates 66.111.4.29 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=tech-lists@zyxst.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-5.08 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[zyxst.net:s=fm3,messagingengine.com:s=fm3]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.03)[-1.029]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_GOOD(0.00)[66.111.4.29:from]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:66.111.4.29]; MIME_GOOD(-0.20)[multipart/signed,text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-arm@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.99)[-0.986]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[zyxst.net]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[zyxst.net:+,messagingengine.com:+]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.37)[-1.369]; SIGNED_PGP(-2.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:11403, ipnet:66.111.4.0/24, country:US]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-arm]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[66.111.4.29:from] X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Sep 2020 12:32:02 -0000 --mP3DRpeJDSE+ciuQ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, What's the best way to capture a drop to ddb before the kernel fully boots? With some searching I've found a couple of ways, but most pages I've seen a= re either for other OSes or they may be stale. So, what's the best way (by "be= st" I mean most convenient/easy that gets the job done) with a -current as of r365355? i.e. it has all the debugging bits you'd expect compiled in as per -curren generic. I have a FTDI console cable https://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/B01N2K27P9/ref=3Dppx_yo_dt_b_search_asi= n_title?ie=3DUTF8&psc=3D1 but it looks like it can't be used with this. I guess I need an FTDI to TTL 3-wire cable? Or is there a way to make kernel output write to the usb interface before it fully boots? Or of making it write to the sd card? I fitted the rpi4 with an aluminium case that also acts as a passive cooler. It's in contact with the cpu, however there's no access to the GPIO pins wh= en the case is on. If i can get output through one of the ports it'd be great. thanks, --=20 J. --mP3DRpeJDSE+ciuQ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEE8n3tWhxW11Ccvv9/s8o7QhFzNAUFAl9U1rQACgkQs8o7QhFz NAXSqQ/9FjslwzOdvoQCje5mRAAK1xfpC3nRw+mLLQVAPgmP9lpf/xYeG7S/mZ31 othrtuq/z3NfQMeae/lYQInAVX0ohEyHZ3+PCgImwShghT/+VrQePyAjj54FTMx5 z0D0pafu0Dp5UZv60WP3tSSPMu8sNK6ZLv6wmlC+tmqVJNX84w/9JdC01+rxI8PR THg78TLLAdGTvQD1Dwp26lYRpQwA5MfNENeloeSHiBMGR+tzuqkm/YIMhXbMSwsr 9v0wh10t6sHJew4F7utXMHfT6x4ynBsgXlfwJ9SQ/MoYSnDivWhXRs3EYDg46QNv kstE6htikfMOcLOZVaTBd5qXTJYUBrc4ugqmMeBYayX+LqB+qSFQSngdT4RenWWD F5t1Hl0z7Wg5Z2CbXah/HvMujO7sQRpNoTommAb68HmGp3VtixViuthDQJJ+P6Xk wQGBLniLn/+MENlB1CuNQ4Vzqic4M+7yDeJzsc1vbBKN9XPTlB3zAqFIJWrO/nv7 wtklQJl2lc3dQ3ik7czONQIf6gZv0mVOrnYn2usgZp4t+e3tGs2GMeAsVtETRnxe qJ7dfBjH/WgooddAiDXJxkSxXmuooqHZgcKQ9dMqL28+d5qAStQg7fGv+4EVdc8l ztMCYq9UnDU3hMvSSASG7vwG9KOHOOHHzVyqv7E1mSCcVqTesho= =6I8P -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --mP3DRpeJDSE+ciuQ-- From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Sun Sep 6 12:41:08 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 057803D004E for ; Sun, 6 Sep 2020 12:41:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from maciphone2@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-wm1-x32f.google.com (mail-wm1-x32f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32f]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Bkrcg0L6Fz3Zl2 for ; Sun, 6 Sep 2020 12:41:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from maciphone2@googlemail.com) Received: by mail-wm1-x32f.google.com with SMTP id b79so10698982wmb.4 for ; Sun, 06 Sep 2020 05:41:06 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:mime-version:subject:date:references:to :in-reply-to:message-id; bh=wgnDuJJ7fS2kadrtdp0WQm2agq16+uiEWGkeHHS4+Ng=; b=C+I4PzCug+o1xh8c2F3KHsVfdB/hNlr21m9XNp4jGa0if9IRJyzNyvKRug3vN6fVoW jpJbqpOJnFEPKL8JypgwNE6IfVaO2NS0s5P2P8DT9oOAJXXru5m2qR87aeNBoPBBXyWn nE89+xBFq5PURdBicQXEBKI1R8U7xLOrvNKjEedlnVjPGXlhfJ+d0kJ9tO93leOzaUt2 1A5Q7/8cQbimHRyKmptLKW3mNklm1dlrAy50EICdBfQQS3GTzh5kFI627OtxdyTSf6cJ mjwVmEubsWSooOTgCvNywOMGLy1eAznPMifnh8QPT2oVFyNMrPFnUg0c827AOKB992pO Nrhw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5319Ft7sXmS/E9WfdKj9tDYetfHWZvxxnuRHCvxCk9YHcykBJQGF VMElsGWtrYfMHMySBpKLXpM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwq/EY6EZMQWGQorimbSqpK46srvIUfRZAxM4fRfSEn4tBymEfznYRxkHQ5MrPOoaTJPREL2g== X-Received: by 2002:a7b:c00c:: with SMTP id c12mr17248033wmb.54.1599396064817; Sun, 06 Sep 2020 05:41:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([46.114.111.128]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id p1sm43579803wma.0.2020.09.06.05.41.03 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 06 Sep 2020 05:41:04 -0700 (PDT) From: Klaus Cucinauomo Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.0.3.2.26\)) Subject: Re: onboard wireless on rpi4 Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2020 14:40:59 +0200 References: <20200904134619.GB80905@bastion.zyxst.net> <69934262-D9D3-4986-849D-9E8221D1E387@kronometrix.org> <20200904142255.GC80905@bastion.zyxst.net> <5AF83D16-2432-4EA9-BC2F-373DA8BC3360@googlemail.com> <4306A90D-97B9-4DE9-A05A-A91B6F4A587F@yahoo.com> <8037E5D3-E89E-4AED-8FFE-43D9D83B2BD3@yahoo.com> To: Warner Losh , Robert Crowston , Hans Petter Selasky , freebsd-arm@freebsd.org, myfreeweb In-Reply-To: Message-Id: <24CED3CF-6624-4CE3-A21C-D4BAD88E8812@googlemail.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.0.3.2.26) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Bkrcg0L6Fz3Zl2 X-Spamd-Bar: --- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.54 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[googlemail.com]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a00:1450:4000::/36]; RCPT_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[googlemail.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[googlemail.com,quarantine]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.98)[-0.976]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[bsdimp.com,protonmail.com,selasky.org,freebsd.org,unrelenting.technology]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[googlemail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2a00:1450::/32, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[googlemail.com:dkim]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.07)[-1.070]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[googlemail.com:s=20161025]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[46.114.111.128:received]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.99)[-0.993]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-arm@freebsd.org]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2a00:1450:4864:20::32f:from]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-arm] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.33 X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Sep 2020 12:41:08 -0000 > Am 06.09.2020 um 06:40 schrieb Warner Losh : >=20 >=20 > I thought I read they added the busdma constraints we are missing=E2=80=A6= >=20 > Warner >=20 Yes, for OpenBSD I thought the same , to be a little more specific : = https://github.com/openbsd/src/commit/aae395593ca184a639a1c158ceb4b2132d85= e7c2 = = https://github.com/openbsd/src/commit/a88d14946aed5dc48e4e700486795c8d1715= 76d0 = Klaus From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Sun Sep 6 14:03:59 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68B823D1E44 for ; Sun, 6 Sep 2020 14:03:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tech-lists@zyxst.net) Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BktSG61nWz3dw7 for ; Sun, 6 Sep 2020 14:03:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tech-lists@zyxst.net) Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44F215C0039 for ; Sun, 6 Sep 2020 10:03:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 06 Sep 2020 10:03:58 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zyxst.net; h= date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=fm3; bh=T4oyaDPu6zkD/Ie+HNYTBEMr4fN vSVAh2ejJzhGtbpI=; b=ErU+2BElYwS/KtfBQcyL6q84jdHKpVRzEkxmysDv3ac NA3jWqwwmosDPZHfTxdn4Ux7fmPP14SLfAdMb++Ezwzianlelbv099iUciEEjNRs GMa+L9MI6S4yUFzTmWIbP8RPECgI/YxfK1qrPfW3e04s1XZfdgsdfcFpXB87YsV3 9qQX50vhGdZvkydYYMAUJbJAudYVXONgwB8O7Pj9djWPL9vlxnjzwqqbFM+7zowr HWhKICxj0Jt4dOU7YFGeb9LxWlGeDAvNy8oXf8Pf3PUW+ue77ig+TbOxRJogLxNV JN0p40z3jRgtqpEEgVmb2JAsFmzoHWCVu8nVb5M3I/Q== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=T4oyaD Pu6zkD/Ie+HNYTBEMr4fNvSVAh2ejJzhGtbpI=; b=DiEjsLDoIs+Y9/UDh3IEqS XyzagWaGbf9bFRJQRLcxc3LPaMoB3ypsjK1LS7CvY/XS4AkmQXvHTAwVJRR1DeI5 JCQaZWFrKYC0wctaz06YU3b43mcGS3ZgC3vvAqughMEkow52A0docMDfegLsnJmB a9DJv1RtNQWGFkC9FBUXh1Lol7POC9ajbc4nh/nuXLqfiRlaCjYQVuoSJntoz/ju QTW/QD34b9wAsiDVjkuaGBQ/TDhUtnKNshvGMEi1gdZgG5ylAWrw6eQDvVSw6c9S HTyrvii/W86ytk8GUrolqX6RchfFpvC+kuywBfWmJuXk9jsIVHYo51rO/93TNePA == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduiedrudegjedgjeefucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpeffhffvuffkfhggtggujgesghdtre ertddtjeenucfhrhhomhepthgvtghhqdhlihhsthhsuceothgvtghhqdhlihhsthhsseii hiigshhtrdhnvghtqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpedtteelkeeuvedthfeuleeiffeivd dvffdtleduteekffevueffledtledvveegueenucfkphepkedvrdejtddrledurdelleen ucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehtvggthh dqlhhishhtshesiiihgihsthdrnhgvth X-ME-Proxy: Received: from bastion.zyxst.net (bastion.zyxst.net [82.70.91.99]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id AA897328005D for ; Sun, 6 Sep 2020 10:03:57 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2020 15:03:28 +0100 From: tech-lists To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: GENERIC-NODEBUG fails to boot since r363887 Message-ID: <20200906140328.GB82216@bastion.zyxst.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="cvVnyQ+4j833TQvp" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BktSG61nWz3dw7 X-Spamd-Bar: ----- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=zyxst.net header.s=fm3 header.b=ErU+2BEl; dkim=pass header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm3 header.b=DiEjsLDo; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of tech-lists@zyxst.net designates 66.111.4.29 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=tech-lists@zyxst.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-5.11 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[zyxst.net:s=fm3,messagingengine.com:s=fm3]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.99)[-0.988]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_GOOD(0.00)[66.111.4.29:from]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:66.111.4.29]; MIME_GOOD(-0.20)[multipart/signed,text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-arm@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.98)[-0.981]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[zyxst.net]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[zyxst.net:+,messagingengine.com:+]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.44)[-0.442]; SIGNED_PGP(-2.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:11403, ipnet:66.111.4.0/24, country:US]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-arm]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[66.111.4.29:from] X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Sep 2020 14:03:59 -0000 --cvVnyQ+4j833TQvp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 11:31:18AM +0000, qroxana via freebsd-arm wrote: > >Tested on my A20 and H3 boards: > >r363886 GENERIC works >r363886 GENERIC-NODEBUG works > >r363887 GENERIC works >r363887 GENERIC-NODEBUG fails to boot > >Any ideas? I have not been able to even complete buildkernel for GENERIC-NODEBUG on rp= i4 ever since I started trying about a week ag=D1=91. GENERIC builds, installs and boots fine though. GENERIC-MMCCAM builds, installs but drops to ddb> when it tries to load the kernel. --=20 J. --cvVnyQ+4j833TQvp Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEE8n3tWhxW11Ccvv9/s8o7QhFzNAUFAl9U7EIACgkQs8o7QhFz NAUnWg//dRfrwyuEwZUrvMp63FX+HQkWHzhHvEUS46G9q9oNdFwNBgr8pNjHJlg3 hefVN0iBcbeqqSH9oGGmJpbKrwYBm5L8B35z+SoetKsrIPNmG0tC7phmE9XXbSYj d6cli9zFRDBOYzgj7BTddiMdGSVkQ6/kwmDNbpcFc3jucM7w4DougCz8GtbW5jid NThRylMq6mpS2P4/+KDwtVEplvjPZGDV/5TrljwwnQ+LOrfomn+BzgPYGNxX9z0q CGrE4sHz6kt/ujzLff+13jOGcmXKc+uOQtIwk01BvdLQPSRWpO2D8W7JswG96xRt 1c2kseU8EVSnhIhNFirjsKlV5ANSDUM2f5oqpsSBKxrYwY8HNU3G7n9nqodpbTuQ WPYWGEZjfovDNPcH0JTIQl8OEsEPFL/m242wNcQGDdnG/q9FjyrhWx52z/VOi5ob 3OIKvbg/GC22Zz9jtYcrlrfRQ+AFsy+mepAUBrdFoRyARMDkICYOKlNXQDQfR0tr jE0KGXLo/iwpvJjLjezTKhZ4F4jeoU7FP5cYq2fsoHnObe1lXria6t8qfIK/eDpk 0UACfYDtOWw3L/x8hK2WVuO9KHQU14ZQvPZxPMM7VH6K0lwSvqKTtC41O1A4nuHn 9FeCvtDCOGxwkuizdH5rRqzx7PnOEFnzibF3WZMnb/9DBM7Vln4= =zfIL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --cvVnyQ+4j833TQvp-- From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Sun Sep 6 14:58:30 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87AD03D385F for ; Sun, 6 Sep 2020 14:58:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tech-lists@zyxst.net) Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Bkvg91bbwz40Fm for ; Sun, 6 Sep 2020 14:58:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tech-lists@zyxst.net) Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95B155C00B8 for ; Sun, 6 Sep 2020 10:58:28 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 06 Sep 2020 10:58:28 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zyxst.net; h= date:from:to:subject:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s= fm3; bh=stRNUq/KPM17Yorgyip00xeGtktdoFWwXmna2CpG5KY=; b=Zuo2gUc5 23y9a+Pua2Ef1X8BREoCKWviIx1MBWTGSyTKVNqNL8rPuzqq16Qj0Nv9NXiBMd0Q WYHP+rYsGKtjWSmuJSNvqZ19Qs92PKQRSNugCYTid7jBLVI6E0BOnErlgv6r+UR8 zW4KM/Mz1agULPqGAdPtG7yWLI0veVrpUR96eQ4lNERROtu6yVfisyeKhixieBu+ nO6ZPwiNRklB97ZXw474CbWt3IH69SoD08msdJqFNQElvP/XM++94NHMxE/zXpLy 2akfimBfKcMO6Q3Nc7uEoIkzz6TOMGobSlxlv15Ucz2fg8iSOBhGDgZ+3QKFuwOJ WjSG50WlLeL5Cw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:message-id :mime-version:subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=stRNUq/KPM17Yorgyip00xeGtktdo FWwXmna2CpG5KY=; b=CGv8o/xllYqLUwYil7sZ7+N1L34EchPr5cN8fX7iEH83O c3MPjjnWlxgxq/At0QLXoi6qJ4Cv75nNc8pKNTjKsoTpyhrGRb56b9sO4kVfwSp/ 73ovRpMNHcFibDlRGnwHg8fy3fyQBN9a7tAjej7RtHZJfzpG/yNcaA3+Ze9C8W3J jImD52shP18HKKzf25uDu1mQPoUXI88vXakAMxvhhApBPp/gzAtakUxkM1/ZugDl 0zSNyRhIOphax58fkUp7O8LF38XhJRPSr9ciCOo/2AyvB+rZNwHNEbU0DBbrb3q5 EK3CPAo1OMozwRMUxPu1s5pHrC/A9J2lP63EqhPMg== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduiedrudegjedgkeegucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpeffhffvuffkgggtugesghdtreertd dtvdenucfhrhhomhepthgvtghhqdhlihhsthhsuceothgvtghhqdhlihhsthhsseiihiig shhtrdhnvghtqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeekleehfefgvdetgfeflefgvdekueevve ekgfdtgeevheeugfekveeijeelgfeggeenucffohhmrghinhepfhhrvggvsghsugdrohhr ghenucfkphepkedvrdejtddrledurdelleenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurf grrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehtvggthhdqlhhishhtshesiiihgihsthdrnhgvth X-ME-Proxy: Received: from bastion.zyxst.net (bastion.zyxst.net [82.70.91.99]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id D1D6B328005E for ; Sun, 6 Sep 2020 10:58:27 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2020 15:57:58 +0100 From: tech-lists To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: rpi4 won't overclock Message-ID: <20200906145758.GA74236@bastion.zyxst.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="OXfL5xGRrasGEqWY" Content-Disposition: inline X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Bkvg91bbwz40Fm X-Spamd-Bar: ----- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=zyxst.net header.s=fm3 header.b=Zuo2gUc5; dkim=pass header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm3 header.b=CGv8o/xl; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of tech-lists@zyxst.net designates 66.111.4.25 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=tech-lists@zyxst.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-5.22 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[zyxst.net:s=fm3,messagingengine.com:s=fm3]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.99)[-0.989]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_GOOD(0.00)[66.111.4.25:from]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:66.111.4.25:c]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.20)[multipart/signed,text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-arm@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.98)[-0.977]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[zyxst.net]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[zyxst.net:+,messagingengine.com:+]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.55)[-0.553]; SIGNED_PGP(-2.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:11403, ipnet:66.111.4.0/24, country:US]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-arm]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[66.111.4.25:from] X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Sep 2020 14:58:30 -0000 --OXfL5xGRrasGEqWY Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, I can't oc the pi in the usual way with -current on rpi4. Obviously I'm doi= ng something wrong, but I don't know what. If I put parameters in config_rpi4.txt, they're seemingly ignored. If I take these out of there and put them instead at the bottom of config.txt, the pi will fail to boot (I think it's failing u-boot, it says, in VGA, it needs newer firmware). I've installed to rpi4 as per https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arm/2020-August/022162.html The parameters I want to use are: arm_freq=3D2100 gpu_freq=3D750 over_voltage=3D6 Even with make -j4 it sits stubbornly at 0.6GHz. The cpu is usually below 40 degC in a 20 degC environment. It'll go to 46 degC when make buildkernel ru= ns. I've tried much lower parameters with the same result. What am I doing wron= g? thanks, --=20 J. --OXfL5xGRrasGEqWY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEE8n3tWhxW11Ccvv9/s8o7QhFzNAUFAl9U+QcACgkQs8o7QhFz NAVyfA/+NOECUbvb27/wwY+D4+rDqFg7DfcnkZs8DhSqdlaB/Ji+H2GPmruyMJhD yR3J97/+BlD53ooKOnMbwWY7xv/1QyHvkSg/NMITz2qel7mXCz1bB7dCyjrpBCcc YrOjPmmqRszutHYGm1FUodWkYShbiEqlvyxwUKpFE0sZdLwk5RiYsXEQwoOnVYDN h59Xuq92jWArRZr47t6dcTcgFFSNHhF9VFfGPWCbLmzmak1V7SjNbLrT2so7Q5ax lzkC6yCD0DIzZkGP6YuGmefOXSjZzSoU0fspCrOzIeZ2OzVzHrMcMdKAT1pDvytW c4CJ6LTkdMda24LpW1PbE3Td4Xx6FHdpqCX9Vj0r0W7tJZSdsApf0/w5IdPU8fyW U9zbpPLm+ryvAkRDJCQwnsjL/xH4jFCsb8wuy7x/KtBlnS0q8CO9c/bC4/0b2Lz9 kCr1YVNTJMySFXJhSW3L0gzcYFG2vlAPKpSy4mB6wRxxaDySKgF6O4aTlBKtW4JP c4OBQ0isuKjM6Xzmo5PeE1gzKoLMSoAqFnK9iqyBdreQJsVwDJ7bGvcu9h2Fcsv+ fdt2GP7R+aDQMWTPuYVrO3Aufbj5VsS7YzqC/qELYjdm475GYLlONB2/rX1hRm4A +ylQoevFw+ZzfePrKhHVurN6z1nAr+9vgw9Y4Zg4vNV8ewNaUhU= =nydm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --OXfL5xGRrasGEqWY-- From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Sun Sep 6 15:20:13 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F2963D4200 for ; Sun, 6 Sep 2020 15:20:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from crowston@protonmail.com) Received: from mail-40131.protonmail.ch (mail-40131.protonmail.ch [185.70.40.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "protonmail.com", Issuer "SwissSign Server Gold CA 2014 - G22" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Bkw8D4HBvz41fL for ; Sun, 6 Sep 2020 15:20:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from crowston@protonmail.com) Date: Sun, 06 Sep 2020 15:20:04 +0000 To: Klaus Cucinauomo From: Robert Crowston Cc: Warner Losh , Hans Petter Selasky , "freebsd-arm@freebsd.org" , myfreeweb Reply-To: Robert Crowston Subject: Re: onboard wireless on rpi4 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <24CED3CF-6624-4CE3-A21C-D4BAD88E8812@googlemail.com> References: <20200904134619.GB80905@bastion.zyxst.net> <5AF83D16-2432-4EA9-BC2F-373DA8BC3360@googlemail.com> <4306A90D-97B9-4DE9-A05A-A91B6F4A587F@yahoo.com> <8037E5D3-E89E-4AED-8FFE-43D9D83B2BD3@yahoo.com> <24CED3CF-6624-4CE3-A21C-D4BAD88E8812@googlemail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE shortcircuit=no autolearn=disabled version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on mailout.protonmail.ch X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Bkw8D4HBvz41fL X-Spamd-Bar: --- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.10 / 15.00]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[crowston@protonmail.com]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[protonmail.com]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:185.70.40.0/24]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_GOOD(0.00)[185.70.40.131:from]; RCPT_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[protonmail.com:+]; MIME_BASE64_TEXT(0.10)[]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[protonmail.com,quarantine]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.24)[-0.239]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[googlemail.com]; RCVD_COUNT_ZERO(0.00)[0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[protonmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:62371, ipnet:185.70.40.0/24, country:CH]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.99)[-0.986]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[protonmail.com:s=protonmail]; REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.98)[-0.975]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; FREEMAIL_REPLYTO(0.00)[protonmail.com]; HAS_PHPMAILER_SIG(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[185.70.40.131:from]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-arm] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.33 X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Sep 2020 15:20:13 -0000 VGhhdCdzIGludGVyZXN0aW5nOiBPcGVuQlNEIGlzIGFsbG93aW5nIG9ubHkgdGhlIGxvd2VzdCAx IEdCIG9mIG1lbW9yeSBmb3IgRE1BOyB0aGUgZG9jdW1lbnRhdGlvbiBJIG9idGFpbmVkIHN1Z2dl c3RzIHRoZSBmaXJzdCAzIEdCIHNob3VsZCBiZSBhY2Nlc3NpYmxlLiBJIGFtIGV4cGVyaW1lbnRp bmcgd2l0aCB0aGlzIG5ldyBsb3dlciBib3VuZC4KCuKAkOKAkOKAkOKAkOKAkOKAkOKAkCBPcmln aW5hbCBNZXNzYWdlIOKAkOKAkOKAkOKAkOKAkOKAkOKAkApPbiBTdW5kYXksIDYgU2VwdGVtYmVy IDIwMjAgMTM6NDAsIEtsYXVzIEN1Y2luYXVvbW8gPG1hY2lwaG9uZTJAZ29vZ2xlbWFpbC5jb20+ IHdyb3RlOgoKPj4gQW0gMDYuMDkuMjAyMCB1bSAwNjo0MCBzY2hyaWViIFdhcm5lciBMb3NoIDxp bXBAYnNkaW1wLmNvbT46Cj4+Cj4+IEkgdGhvdWdodCBJIHJlYWQgdGhleSBhZGRlZCB0aGUgYnVz ZG1hIGNvbnN0cmFpbnRzIHdlIGFyZSBtaXNzaW5n4oCmCj4+Cj4+IFdhcm5lcgo+Cj4gWWVzLCBm b3IgT3BlbkJTRCBJIHRob3VnaHQgdGhlIHNhbWUgLCB0byBiZSBhIGxpdHRsZSBtb3JlIHNwZWNp ZmljIDoKPgo+IGh0dHBzOi8vZ2l0aHViLmNvbS9vcGVuYnNkL3NyYy9jb21taXQvYWFlMzk1NTkz Y2ExODRhNjM5YTFjMTU4Y2ViNGIyMTMyZDg1ZTdjMgo+Cj4gaHR0cHM6Ly9naXRodWIuY29tL29w ZW5ic2Qvc3JjL2NvbW1pdC9hODhkMTQ5NDZhZWQ1ZGM0OGU0ZTcwMDQ4Njc5NWM4ZDE3MTU3NmQw Cj4KPiBLbGF1cw== From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Sun Sep 6 18:16:10 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55B683D958B for ; Sun, 6 Sep 2020 18:16:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from crowston@protonmail.com) Received: from mail-40136.protonmail.ch (mail-40136.protonmail.ch [185.70.40.136]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "protonmail.com", Issuer "SwissSign Server Gold CA 2014 - G22" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Bl03F06frz4JPb for ; Sun, 6 Sep 2020 18:16:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from crowston@protonmail.com) Date: Sun, 06 Sep 2020 18:16:02 +0000 To: Robert Crowston From: Robert Crowston Cc: Klaus Cucinauomo , "freebsd-arm@freebsd.org" Reply-To: Robert Crowston Subject: Re: onboard wireless on rpi4 Message-ID: <5u2b7xt1_fm5BlXrwr9UEqnraMQDmFnYxCNVzbjJ8tM3MSYZ0Gh5k7TpiVOH4cZbEa6Sd4qQqicQDt4r_U5iXPRjodjwghbiKL55BHigEtM=@protonmail.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20200904134619.GB80905@bastion.zyxst.net> <5AF83D16-2432-4EA9-BC2F-373DA8BC3360@googlemail.com> <4306A90D-97B9-4DE9-A05A-A91B6F4A587F@yahoo.com> <8037E5D3-E89E-4AED-8FFE-43D9D83B2BD3@yahoo.com> <24CED3CF-6624-4CE3-A21C-D4BAD88E8812@googlemail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM shortcircuit=no autolearn=disabled version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on mailout.protonmail.ch X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Bl03F06frz4JPb X-Spamd-Bar: --- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.46 / 15.00]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[crowston@protonmail.com]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[protonmail.com]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:185.70.40.0/24]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[protonmail.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[protonmail.com,quarantine]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.55)[-0.552]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[protonmail.com]; RCVD_COUNT_ZERO(0.00)[0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[protonmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:62371, ipnet:185.70.40.0/24, country:CH]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.95)[-0.946]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[protonmail.com:s=protonmail]; REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.96)[-0.964]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; FREEMAIL_REPLYTO(0.00)[protonmail.com]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[185.70.40.136:from]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_VERYGOOD(0.00)[185.70.40.136:from]; FREEMAIL_CC(0.00)[googlemail.com,freebsd.org]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-arm] X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Sep 2020 18:16:10 -0000 Using only the lowest 1 GiB for DMA seems completely reliable. Perhaps I co= uld have a volunteer to test https://reviews.freebsd.org/D26344 ? -- RHC. =E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90 Original Me= ssage =E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90 On Sunday, 6 September 2020 16:20, Robert Crowston via freebsd-arm wrote: > That's interesting: OpenBSD is allowing only the lowest 1 GB of memory fo= r DMA; the documentation I obtained suggests the first 3 GB should be acces= sible. I am experimenting with this new lower bound. > > =E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90 Original = Message =E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90 > On Sunday, 6 September 2020 13:40, Klaus Cucinauomo maciphone2@googlemail= .com wrote: > > > > Am 06.09.2020 um 06:40 schrieb Warner Losh imp@bsdimp.com: > > > I thought I read they added the busdma constraints we are missing= =E2=80=A6 > > > Warner > > > > Yes, for OpenBSD I thought the same , to be a little more specific : > > https://github.com/openbsd/src/commit/aae395593ca184a639a1c158ceb4b2132= d85e7c2 > > https://github.com/openbsd/src/commit/a88d14946aed5dc48e4e700486795c8d1= 71576d0 > > Klaus > > freebsd-arm@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arm-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Sun Sep 6 18:21:04 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC1AA3D988A for ; Sun, 6 Sep 2020 18:21:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marklmi@yahoo.com) Received: from sonic308-55.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (sonic308-55.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com [98.137.68.31]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Bl08v3xyLz4JRc for ; Sun, 6 Sep 2020 18:21:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marklmi@yahoo.com) X-YMail-OSG: uQvpACcVM1mFSP85sLiC0WhQkGrPZr8FmPOq7509aXPGg8N14taK7m4CciIivwZ HgXYEX.IwYq0hGYKBVI7v_b.0u2JyuNkbWaEE7XTIMNS86Ap0sOzSIBofeuR1AdsIg_UaQuhq8N9 Dpb3WnMjLfQt12Cwv1ri.KRJp.KfFq1tAFDJCw456omrdVKnbsXSrlgQBOl8MANA5UVrTFU0QYD9 RAdbJud0DrhyYLB8jCc.tMa53I062PFtkLA7IF7mJVAkZ7amdgWwxZrYrowfD.mQprIlLxgcRg8Y T01Og6iUoYEqCZyZcq1VJWBjPm.s.z0jAk1eN8mZOsp0CUHzkcPA05G0rk1QGkv.iHKiweGKuiJ5 n4i.u621FN7t5SMkdYPP7h8o9wVehmBMvFqQSRVMhyhI4zAmhxKSBqQl69zZh49W32sqiNwsRMNO DwIm55YpBo1Au2Q6Y679PdMhMb12Vh15WdSd7PAffDC04t_xAT1lxMAn9Ca5BZLqski5Voc7DxrX XNMfjFdqtFCAu54SOYJ7Ory78sEQStrwwpBv3EZrifbMTkDsCLY4gpxWgKRX0nGnocQ6LGOb5BEZ 3ExCHlO1kR1jIaHqIzLn.YRZe0ljvW6QDqQUb3T6yVfesvzn.u_Qg4YVNH.s6_e5G_c.JDBth3Uq 06yVkOHEk.ARKMU.vSlEwShSHUjojh0PX3ewdlc_KI2gsiqJT61k4x2D7RhMgrY3D1q0CbToS4ll ecfmpDH6L0er1nHZUsnTqTSrtNJZC0L0lzS_tES2ar4kEDqkJ6OtotdTyNEu76F_ZpjexaTNbI1o FBMM_IfXD4zySYzhPMhFqABefxdO9mOHSNTBkGGC3HDnA2myMGFs99FTbOllHcnGR1JrbNEMpVMA nAsw1Z9Lh4o75eIttBZoCg0cPImRvlee.PJ0h6ZSZ_1huRZ80.aBjaedXbSGePu_x4QX0lWrYMgL J3OycxnQ9k9rkiq0UMrEvDf4WS_gfXS4VMcTtbtsuX2A7AWmGksogBynFGpPR6hpO7cB6Uy3W98v vh79KPAu6F6Y2cU.rrsR3ikpozYITH9QxKobnGHCLb4Nyuy3LHdBixy_cXTYwdnQsLI7gKx7EhZA BIbIxq7rt8hCx9OMLWNVgPeoDAdfLRW75pNsRQr1CNgxt6n9EliMv_uao0FOjS98YCnBBqqLTT6K ApxxZzhJFRWWBTaW_jSpgGlz0K9hVP_q1fgzh7eJpAzolXeqMdmCfNyvnnxLr_1Ronn8.ugBbMtz a3PD_I.2qEAcD5FYcie3tUzYCFLGpWAY_vtCeovj4_sRAaPh6vFAD0nxHz2eSjexPziTWrV12KTv LAxeAiZtHKa23F3XRv6kACwBEnCkGr4PUDxaycGQKzvT_PtpBqpJxORQwL5zC83uQwMVNVhtUO3P GEdw8ahkUCoL75oianOunZlucQrZrTOo1wzuLXog.ixiN6uUQEuMhyb4qcO0oQGOl3PwxOyZv2uS i18DKwlv7Gc14sL_RhYTI1Xz2SmejyxVX_K5BK7dtQKQY2z0uNToSDGZq.g0KvraQSCIS9eSD9KO 28hk4dHcQPHD7iwWXpXykyj1Ft6DI8hELPGOU Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic308.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with HTTP; Sun, 6 Sep 2020 18:21:01 +0000 Received: by smtp404.mail.ne1.yahoo.com (VZM Hermes SMTP Server) with ESMTPA ID 387877ce58ab3e8ad23fee38efb3b7c4; Sun, 06 Sep 2020 18:20:59 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.1\)) Subject: Re: onboard wireless on rpi4 From: Mark Millard In-Reply-To: Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2020 11:20:57 -0700 Cc: "freebsd-arm@freebsd.org" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <9B62C18C-EE94-4DFE-8EA9-AC7B32966886@yahoo.com> References: <20200904134619.GB80905@bastion.zyxst.net> <5AF83D16-2432-4EA9-BC2F-373DA8BC3360@googlemail.com> <4306A90D-97B9-4DE9-A05A-A91B6F4A587F@yahoo.com> <8037E5D3-E89E-4AED-8FFE-43D9D83B2BD3@yahoo.com> <24CED3CF-6624-4CE3-A21C-D4BAD88E8812@googlemail.com> To: Robert Crowston X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.1) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Bl08v3xyLz4JRc X-Spamd-Bar: --- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.01 / 15.00]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[yahoo.com]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ptr:yahoo.com]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[yahoo.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[yahoo.com,reject]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.51)[-0.515]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[protonmail.com]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[yahoo.com]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:36647, ipnet:98.137.64.0/20, country:US]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.99)[-0.986]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[yahoo.com:s=s2048]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[yahoo.com:dkim]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.005]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[98.137.68.31:from]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[98.137.68.31:from]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-arm] X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Sep 2020 18:21:04 -0000 On 2020-Sep-6, at 08:20, Robert Crowston via freebsd-arm wrote: > That's interesting: OpenBSD is allowing only the lowest 1 GB of memory = for DMA; the documentation I obtained suggests the first 3 GB should be = accessible. I am experimenting with this new lower bound. https://rpi4-uefi.dev/tag/netbsd/ reports: QUOTE NetBSD also is the only OS today to fully support ACPI _DMA descriptors = for describing DMA translations/constraints. This is very important for = supporting Pi and Pi-like platforms via straight-up ACPI and without = platform DMA quirks.=20 END QUOTE > =E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90 = Original Message =E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2= =80=90 > On Sunday, 6 September 2020 13:40, Klaus Cucinauomo wrote: >=20 >>> Am 06.09.2020 um 06:40 schrieb Warner Losh : >>>=20 >>> I thought I read they added the busdma constraints we are missing=E2=80= =A6 >>>=20 >>> Warner >>=20 >> Yes, for OpenBSD I thought the same , to be a little more specific : >>=20 >> = https://github.com/openbsd/src/commit/aae395593ca184a639a1c158ceb4b2132d85= e7c2 >>=20 >> = https://github.com/openbsd/src/commit/a88d14946aed5dc48e4e700486795c8d1715= 76d0 >=20 =3D=3D=3D Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away in early 2018-Mar) From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Sun Sep 6 18:23:51 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B76C73D9747 for ; Sun, 6 Sep 2020 18:23:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike@karels.net) Received: from mail.karels.net (mail.karels.net [216.160.39.52]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Bl0D65tDTz4K0s for ; Sun, 6 Sep 2020 18:23:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike@karels.net) Received: from mjklap.karels.net (mjklap.karels.net [10.0.4.3]) by mail.karels.net (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 086INnj5026143 for ; Sun, 6 Sep 2020 13:23:49 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from mike@karels.net) Subject: Re: onboard wireless on rpi4 To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org References: <20200904134619.GB80905@bastion.zyxst.net> <5AF83D16-2432-4EA9-BC2F-373DA8BC3360@googlemail.com> <4306A90D-97B9-4DE9-A05A-A91B6F4A587F@yahoo.com> <8037E5D3-E89E-4AED-8FFE-43D9D83B2BD3@yahoo.com> <24CED3CF-6624-4CE3-A21C-D4BAD88E8812@googlemail.com> From: Mike Karels Message-ID: <32d5ad15-291c-4cf0-533a-0e6e4cb78bb7@karels.net> Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2020 13:23:25 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.2.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by mail.karels.net id 086INnj5026143 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Bl0D65tDTz4K0s X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of mike@karels.net designates 216.160.39.52 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=mike@karels.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.85 / 15.00]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FREEFALL_USER(0.00)[mike]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:216.160.39.52]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-arm@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.97)[-0.973]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[karels.net]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.05)[0.052]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.73)[-0.731]; RCVD_NO_TLS_LAST(0.10)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:209, ipnet:216.160.36.0/22, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-arm] X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Sep 2020 18:23:51 -0000 On 2020-09-06 10:20, Robert Crowston via freebsd-arm wrote: > That's interesting: OpenBSD is allowing only the lowest 1 GB of memory = for DMA; the documentation I obtained suggests the first 3 GB should be a= ccessible. I am experimenting with this new lower bound. The ftb has this under soc: dma-ranges =3D <0xc0000000 0x0 0x0 0x3c000000= >; At one point, I looked up how to decode this.=C2=A0 I thought it specifie= d a=20 window in which DMA is not allowed, but I'm not sure now. =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 Mike > > =E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90 Origina= l Message =E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90 > On Sunday, 6 September 2020 13:40, Klaus Cucinauomo wrote: > >>> Am 06.09.2020 um 06:40 schrieb Warner Losh : >>> >>> I thought I read they added the busdma constraints we are missing=E2=80= =A6 >>> >>> Warner >> Yes, for OpenBSD I thought the same , to be a little more specific : >> >> https://github.com/openbsd/src/commit/aae395593ca184a639a1c158ceb4b213= 2d85e7c2 >> >> https://github.com/openbsd/src/commit/a88d14946aed5dc48e4e700486795c8d= 171576d0 >> >> Klaus > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-arm@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arm-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Sun Sep 6 18:36:11 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 611713D9F19 for ; Sun, 6 Sep 2020 18:36:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from greg@unrelenting.technology) Received: from out0.migadu.com (out0.migadu.com [94.23.1.103]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Bl0VL1Qrcz4Kbg for ; Sun, 6 Sep 2020 18:36:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from greg@unrelenting.technology) MIME-Version: 1.0 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=unrelenting.technology; s=default; t=1599417361; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=EUpmgn2LcKJ6wzVA3ZNc7O1tOieO60S/zL2isw5f45I=; b=hVu8R9o4r1kB1k9xOMHqWiwdYF+RzpDyViNYlgwpT6fhEyVrYK2qgJidf+eOD0CKJ0uJtW LdD+yxKa2YWGiPItwqXMDF8M8ZwHiYMbljpdvbUZp2+v1Do81dJZv7MWPM30smltOcsz6p r+uyIowkctrCNJx+ILaylEb2R5pwZ/Q= Date: Sun, 06 Sep 2020 18:36:00 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. From: greg@unrelenting.technology Message-ID: Subject: Re: onboard wireless on rpi4 To: "Mark Millard" , "Robert Crowston" Cc: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <9B62C18C-EE94-4DFE-8EA9-AC7B32966886@yahoo.com> References: <9B62C18C-EE94-4DFE-8EA9-AC7B32966886@yahoo.com> <20200904134619.GB80905@bastion.zyxst.net> <5AF83D16-2432-4EA9-BC2F-373DA8BC3360@googlemail.com> <4306A90D-97B9-4DE9-A05A-A91B6F4A587F@yahoo.com> <8037E5D3-E89E-4AED-8FFE-43D9D83B2BD3@yahoo.com> <24CED3CF-6624-4CE3-A21C-D4BAD88E8812@googlemail.com> X-Spam-Score: -3.09 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Bl0VL1Qrcz4Kbg X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=unrelenting.technology header.s=default header.b=hVu8R9o4; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=unrelenting.technology; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of greg@unrelenting.technology designates 94.23.1.103 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=greg@unrelenting.technology X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.39 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.93)[-0.928]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[unrelenting.technology:s=default]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:94.23.1.103]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.94)[-0.939]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[unrelenting.technology:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[unrelenting.technology,none]; FROM_NO_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.53)[-0.527]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[yahoo.com,protonmail.com]; RCVD_COUNT_ZERO(0.00)[0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_VERYGOOD(0.00)[94.23.1.103:from]; ASN(0.00)[asn:16276, ipnet:94.23.0.0/16, country:FR]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-arm] X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Sep 2020 18:36:11 -0000 September 6, 2020 9:20 PM, "Mark Millard via freebsd-arm" wrote:=0A=0A> On 2020-Sep-6, at 08:20, Robert Crowston via fre= ebsd-arm wrote:=0A> =0A>> That's interesting= : OpenBSD is allowing only the lowest 1 GB of memory for DMA; the documen= tation I=0A>> obtained suggests the first 3 GB should be accessible. I am= experimenting with this new lower=0A>> bound.=0A> =0A> https://rpi4-uefi= .dev/tag/netbsd reports:=0A> =0A> QUOTE=0A> NetBSD also is the only OS to= day to fully support ACPI _DMA descriptors for describing DMA=0A> transla= tions/constraints. This is very important for supporting Pi and Pi-like p= latforms via=0A> straight-up ACPI and without platform DMA quirks.=0A> EN= D QUOTE=0A=0AThat would be https://reviews.freebsd.org/D25219 for us.. no= t "full support" though because our bus dma tags are way too weak and inf= lexible, much worse than NetBSD's :(=0A=0AThe RPi ACPI tables declare a 3= GB limit for XHCI, and a 1GB limit for some other devices.=0A=0ANamely, d= evices described by=0Ahttps://github.com/tianocore/edk2-platforms/blob/ma= ster/Platform/RaspberryPi/AcpiTables/GpuDevs.asl From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Sun Sep 6 18:39:43 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86A113D9ED3 for ; Sun, 6 Sep 2020 18:39:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marklmi@yahoo.com) Received: from sonic303-25.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (sonic303-25.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com [98.137.64.206]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Bl0ZQ0nC3z4KrG for ; Sun, 6 Sep 2020 18:39:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marklmi@yahoo.com) X-YMail-OSG: IEnZVosVM1n06MCHd8m1dhOrFqVaBXBfUKVeWrCJMPYWvFKddrKCnHc26FHl_hb OM6LeErd79eKI3BBnSL6Ibyjpx1FCVDW4la7AqcHJB83ByjHulY9421SL7FvMfG7pPZd0uemvzWU 0D27PrdjkEaoMdDs2RA50tM.GWkxkX.PYBCPfGIAqz9l3ym2_1peeYJ4Vk3zO1yLMGx_O_mj3AZI 4gvW2QUF.QMD3FI76.WGgDen3lR8VnH10d5BoQZFwrOaHGddERg_NBFMcwMhDMzrTHQWI6C_Pq_f tD.phCKxlAjSeL0hX6aRgJDGwP.rRvPkh1vNHHI01XSweP4FIkQIaVxrYIy76NdAzXHtORemD3ck 7lzOzLt8SeHJU.3lq3XImAB8JWdpZtV7W1jSTCtoc7KhZzIdR06DkIy4tvCY.P1AtHzKi4icum.j jAwGujAu8sq0UBRTajkyEkGNpgDiixAdo3c2iqsvl7FGBc3LAtvSHbe3SSPLyFVExRMgKeHJH3sa 22qx5cwTA.8RU7e_OWMmu0ljCfmUc2xxAkoN4xEe1S9Kogt45g_Sc6.RPN2EumjMrMA0BoymaEIX 3uEWGoN0to_qFfDVk67JTT253bREU2dX9pOc6pJj2dh97o766NisCWGNfIcgV6QPtQDHYidXw40R o6FfX9wOS1Nqk4gIW7Ftb5V8SFaokvh45361szKPMrANciZsZjkmsEpR26X2lDBMDcYeIXLoKW6O EtfzmHTbwXtdbcDO87aWaIAA6gihF86RjrUjkN1MH492SqX2I5o9CaMS1tJnHd9Ah0IppOr75xS2 jb73HoNh6dlTwQ3tnNCnLtvn5fLYuwLqYdGgIBCW2qAmFhMzqtkXNFfLN1cIgTswRYDRMEYeJUTX x6sr7PYg6w0vwiS88f68C0_17l4PcxCaYN9GwvbVKjdVcEXbw1.0fz8WN4sYVl6dgrq7xNj5J8_M Wws.2SQ5y4Tlk0d3t.X44_ckMzzDTCrfVMnreawJjBcTqkuk3PMlL9pX8MH8JUz4BYs37Pqv0H2v vnwktbDnVqDLdNOpxOVBGzUbgm4Pz_imCuvU6zTCsX2UT.qHob2qrS5QvJKaqT_9ryWqvl0CyzzO 4VCFytuV5PG43OqQaVGtdm6jd2DOdT4byac6ymZ.9RNMWtwNA5zDl0GXukkDaBs.Ciqz5OHwnK6N wOSr1K7HzQvs7HyJ9gUMXjFwKWupVmrOkiH628TqStOcTJpjRwrOvu7J.8bpQ1LvNRLqQF2knucs OLIacbHUl_weT_IEQDtnJwYpY.jRefctRTAvFqs3MtXRPSRmbZZ60OES5OTgbaxemhOH4dniDp2a 2EuR_ToQDLEDWaJqO2MdbfydeaHynpOurJrU.u9A1cY1WO1yjPRcu26dTm3lCpt.CIHO6kq0SgoL MIX7mGZeJhf8jQuxsE096Z3.OQLwYWFAkgWvur8iJ_YlNWE9KhGeXplOcuM5ano.cPejw8EFZPHh HjHaFMbCgatxmLpEaQvC7AKL0nKSl0T9dy28YhqC_atldcq7Cgc95qldKWZYSzc8xakJ8r2thlYK N6es- Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic303.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with HTTP; Sun, 6 Sep 2020 18:39:40 +0000 Received: by smtp404.mail.ne1.yahoo.com (VZM Hermes SMTP Server) with ESMTPA ID ef07317ed77a201d21996afd2035fb8f; Sun, 06 Sep 2020 18:39:35 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.1\)) Subject: Re: onboard wireless on rpi4 From: Mark Millard In-Reply-To: <9B62C18C-EE94-4DFE-8EA9-AC7B32966886@yahoo.com> Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2020 11:39:33 -0700 Cc: "freebsd-arm@freebsd.org" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <20200904134619.GB80905@bastion.zyxst.net> <5AF83D16-2432-4EA9-BC2F-373DA8BC3360@googlemail.com> <4306A90D-97B9-4DE9-A05A-A91B6F4A587F@yahoo.com> <8037E5D3-E89E-4AED-8FFE-43D9D83B2BD3@yahoo.com> <24CED3CF-6624-4CE3-A21C-D4BAD88E8812@googlemail.com> <9B62C18C-EE94-4DFE-8EA9-AC7B32966886@yahoo.com> To: Robert Crowston X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.1) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Bl0ZQ0nC3z4KrG X-Spamd-Bar: --- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.00 / 15.00]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[yahoo.com]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ptr:yahoo.com]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[yahoo.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[yahoo.com,reject]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.51)[-0.512]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[protonmail.com]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[yahoo.com]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:36647, ipnet:98.137.64.0/20, country:US]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.99)[-0.987]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[yahoo.com:s=s2048]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[yahoo.com:dkim]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.005]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[98.137.64.206:from]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[98.137.64.206:from]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-arm] X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Sep 2020 18:39:44 -0000 On 2020-Sep-6, at 11:20, Mark Millard wrote: > On 2020-Sep-6, at 08:20, Robert Crowston via freebsd-arm wrote: >=20 >> That's interesting: OpenBSD is allowing only the lowest 1 GB of = memory for DMA; the documentation I obtained suggests the first 3 GB = should be accessible. I am experimenting with this new lower bound. >=20 > https://rpi4-uefi.dev/tag/netbsd/ reports: >=20 > QUOTE > NetBSD also is the only OS today to fully support ACPI _DMA = descriptors for describing DMA translations/constraints. This is very = important for supporting Pi and Pi-like platforms via straight-up ACPI = and without platform DMA quirks.=20 > END QUOTE I'll also note that for the last month or so the linux 5.8 kernel has use of: acpi_dma_get_range(dev, &dmaaddr, &offset, &size)=20 and rc_dma_get_range(dev, &size) and nc_dma_get_range(dev, &size) in iort_dma_setup(struct device *dev, u64 *dma_addr, u64 *dma_size) in root/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c . (There apparently still is/was also some sort of zero copy DMA problem on the XHCI controller for 5.8. Still, https://github.com/pftf/RPi4/issues/20 was closed based on the linux progress in 5.8 : booting linux with more than 3072 MiB was working.) >> =E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90 = Original Message =E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2= =80=90 >> On Sunday, 6 September 2020 13:40, Klaus Cucinauomo wrote: >>=20 >>>> Am 06.09.2020 um 06:40 schrieb Warner Losh : >>>>=20 >>>> I thought I read they added the busdma constraints we are = missing=E2=80=A6 >>>>=20 >>>> Warner >>>=20 >>> Yes, for OpenBSD I thought the same , to be a little more specific : >>>=20 >>> = https://github.com/openbsd/src/commit/aae395593ca184a639a1c158ceb4b2132d85= e7c2 >>>=20 >>> = https://github.com/openbsd/src/commit/a88d14946aed5dc48e4e700486795c8d1715= 76d0 >>=20 >=20 >=20 =3D=3D=3D Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away in early 2018-Mar) From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Sun Sep 6 18:56:43 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C45B3DA9F6 for ; Sun, 6 Sep 2020 18:56:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tech-lists@zyxst.net) Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Bl0y24RMQz4Lf8 for ; Sun, 6 Sep 2020 18:56:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tech-lists@zyxst.net) Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id B16445C00B6 for ; Sun, 6 Sep 2020 14:56:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 06 Sep 2020 14:56:41 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zyxst.net; h= date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=fm3; bh=Z4UJOQ4hW+j0Hc9EA6ZpTJgka/o PoqL82B0PLSQ9pMc=; b=eiPHDOBav3nP88nKb0Ozk+UuhGyOh744EL7ZFF/tw2m zdZi9zc2ucjoE/IAnuE0Y7KVMsd6niyO3FOpp8LEyjUiNl7WvIvjdWGHHSId5YFV LiJWlEpfeQliedWjjFkRV7whutT53P9Gk/J7SHle7Y+ZihCeyVt1IHeN+dgmiFm1 EH8Xcf9P+8WllDUfOmK5mAmZudcCMn3hrFqTr3hSVHrikw5nQ8f46DBKk3A9z+mz +xPnHN5pQrzGXgo05CgSYLiX0SC6sPfABoI4MsiXj6lZwhONjKOaK5erPyfHzrdi sYIeMm4AElZM/jhAfXgLnWeRqL3ByzrcAE7wPCPKODA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=Z4UJOQ 4hW+j0Hc9EA6ZpTJgka/oPoqL82B0PLSQ9pMc=; b=FbtyBlWOd5xMKsgXKA4YL2 BLlHPzKXeNLobfRpbWbSYmI5aCbcjd/ywyKcoaznfHHTd2LFrgPm1OsaZxFk3fJ8 s+NuJztXvcTeBd2LOqipt37PwSiLirnBG8IHTpX5eXrnD5FxoSKOgSbJ92u/RJzJ pWc5QeSQ6HNMkpGLWcaK8Be3DBwwUc6hcDKNDNAptNrQfIsNKkVBvH5T7D/yFeRW P0H0SHD08zU1DqNTuN6xQLoVjXJSTtIM9z4V39g3y1u3Gfh62SLkE/hHHHB02fza balSM05RAWNNKsaYsvFI0lLZvBsgTmqz6I2Ah4R2Wrvm79S/DXPyExeQenjBGtQg == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduiedrudegjedgudefgecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepfffhvffukfhfgggtuggjsehgtd erredttddvnecuhfhrohhmpehtvggthhdqlhhishhtshcuoehtvggthhdqlhhishhtshes iiihgihsthdrnhgvtheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnheptedttdduuefggeeghfekkeetke ejleefffelheejfffgffdtfeeftdejgeeuieffnecuffhomhgrihhnpehfrhgvvggsshgu rdhorhhgnecukfhppeekvddrjedtrdeluddrleelnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptd enucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthgvtghhqdhlihhsthhsseiihiigshhtrdhn vght X-ME-Proxy: Received: from bastion.zyxst.net (bastion.zyxst.net [82.70.91.99]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 135453280059 for ; Sun, 6 Sep 2020 14:56:40 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2020 19:56:11 +0100 From: tech-lists To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: onboard wireless on rpi4 Message-ID: <20200906185611.GB74236@bastion.zyxst.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org References: <5AF83D16-2432-4EA9-BC2F-373DA8BC3360@googlemail.com> <4306A90D-97B9-4DE9-A05A-A91B6F4A587F@yahoo.com> <8037E5D3-E89E-4AED-8FFE-43D9D83B2BD3@yahoo.com> <24CED3CF-6624-4CE3-A21C-D4BAD88E8812@googlemail.com> <5u2b7xt1_fm5BlXrwr9UEqnraMQDmFnYxCNVzbjJ8tM3MSYZ0Gh5k7TpiVOH4cZbEa6Sd4qQqicQDt4r_U5iXPRjodjwghbiKL55BHigEtM=@protonmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="E39vaYmALEf/7YXx" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5u2b7xt1_fm5BlXrwr9UEqnraMQDmFnYxCNVzbjJ8tM3MSYZ0Gh5k7TpiVOH4cZbEa6Sd4qQqicQDt4r_U5iXPRjodjwghbiKL55BHigEtM=@protonmail.com> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Bl0y24RMQz4Lf8 X-Spamd-Bar: ----- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=zyxst.net header.s=fm3 header.b=eiPHDOBa; dkim=pass header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm3 header.b=FbtyBlWO; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of tech-lists@zyxst.net designates 66.111.4.27 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=tech-lists@zyxst.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-5.91 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[zyxst.net:s=fm3,messagingengine.com:s=fm3]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.99)[-0.989]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_GOOD(0.00)[66.111.4.27:from]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:66.111.4.27]; MIME_GOOD(-0.20)[multipart/signed,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-arm@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.98)[-0.979]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[zyxst.net]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[zyxst.net:+,messagingengine.com:+]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.24)[-1.241]; SIGNED_PGP(-2.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:11403, ipnet:66.111.4.0/24, country:US]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-arm]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[66.111.4.27:from] X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Sep 2020 18:56:43 -0000 --E39vaYmALEf/7YXx Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Sep 06, 2020 at 06:15:35PM +0000, Robert Crowston via freebsd-arm w= rote: >Using only the lowest 1 GiB for DMA seems completely reliable. Perhaps I c= ould have a volunteer to test https://reviews.freebsd.org/D26344 ? Yeah I'll test :D --=20 J. --E39vaYmALEf/7YXx Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEE8n3tWhxW11Ccvv9/s8o7QhFzNAUFAl9VMN4ACgkQs8o7QhFz NAW5GBAAo1lC4Q0daQIZz1MHmsVnm0A0au3mPgGrP1dmHHqUXbvxh7hDKB8dx+/0 lJsBw1VsPBevviksyFtIR4DPd+VF8xZz4TUWmKiMcXwyQy3zTX/CCmFaDnmZpgcv kEYx6jMDIYLSOr1m7K0i5/hWgXlpA8/u4uTowmVa7a+acPzAYW/oQbKs0hdimQUU l9xwIEWdpELIrNrCaTNNebrYZ5rrtsUAAXGmXxj/FCa5tBwaX1yi6X5YNA0Xn/By /4QLbpeew07o/0TYKcSKrRNl/JpD74PVERoSHeeG97GpYmsgbQM7+NP8S7jFldJ1 HAeMNODYrpWO2QMCUtOpzHNe5ZhoRkxulNyrfh/h9GGE2zAci4dREKYexR/cF9xW 32rQfnhXypl3ZA9a2t1vWzhlPEdjtsDSEm5diwePGxFcGO5veqTU5lRTRQsut8p4 DFlvl6DubIiXeLBghcEHj49DvHDOaT/cRUU2MHkqLDWuPRau8QsyvqIgsX2pPoRu Xnhub9BvszFXA8jjeKblKlQaZIFfgbVQKCzjAwfG8IVo08ZFTPWpkCETABxLq3C3 2BvZbQ8Z32eVEq8QXWJAAhjmpckogU3H4Iw8VsrJHS21jOBsh6sOJHnQlbUOCGbI MUWBs+rQtROteD0b03FHiM0Tjhu4CRvNPrO0eS2anYStRUuorg4= =YeUP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --E39vaYmALEf/7YXx-- From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Sun Sep 6 19:15:49 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 964B73DB1B4 for ; Sun, 6 Sep 2020 19:15:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tech-lists@zyxst.net) Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Bl1N42dxfz4N63 for ; Sun, 6 Sep 2020 19:15:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tech-lists@zyxst.net) Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0D395C0065 for ; Sun, 6 Sep 2020 15:15:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 06 Sep 2020 15:15:47 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zyxst.net; h= date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=fm3; bh=RPp01F6ojjSZiO/K04NVZO1vN0B rmaUyorE7BAPcXXM=; b=Q6zC6uU8LW95Hh4w/EZxRPRA1aPcGtLmCTf+BZqba2G LPykgdp5/RUgE34fIXxziNuFgNhG5bLKKroYlGHcqy6aclpsOCTAYnMfu03xekSP GXamJyOZn/p53t+uQeuOG1vxClbgLE9as1zxQ2ef/cxW0bMYioS+j4fu5AapxZPr T1KIZV+XWiF3iuC4aQYkOYl5ZFVqSVbnXATWXt3Lld7dF6IbkxkyGqZiOMhSJDeE fvBKSjXb1KHarcm/X7PO6DL24UE6MiL3hY+/v0wZT3CqyZ+wAaKzIb350WwY4VAF /BEO3zRRAbabcqG2Zx0125PWCf2Pkiw3MD5iBqHVeZg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=RPp01F 6ojjSZiO/K04NVZO1vN0BrmaUyorE7BAPcXXM=; b=C67bCLtg91oS4h3kicArTy jW7TECouREM6lEtBN4zNyt3jmDMAaJaGU2uQeEqRdmgUwZ9hsy9BEUWSaDwyux5N aRI/ivFhdlUdiHwboz/vWhuaU7VABxiTzJgQJ1jHi/F/CUDeol+QoFaQDdkePl7v r064GfRiA3RNgj/YnIatGmfSGqapK97Hn0/13pYsS4LGrvNeMwSdweB7+UBlEBDV iWc4j6HMSi6PZ9ZyW6LHkKWEvV/GywY6gZzDey0WUVHyVNrjLcw89F65/CWIBuD7 Mp0XTfA3DoEYr3ur1LCGhcgu+D7K/uDbvQJhGuqSSxVUfUwWEwJp6hUw061pUSoQ == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduiedrudegjedgudefkecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepfffhvffukfhfgggtuggjsehgtd erredttddvnecuhfhrohhmpehtvggthhdqlhhishhtshcuoehtvggthhdqlhhishhtshes iiihgihsthdrnhgvtheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnheptedttdduuefggeeghfekkeetke ejleefffelheejfffgffdtfeeftdejgeeuieffnecuffhomhgrihhnpehfrhgvvggsshgu rdhorhhgnecukfhppeekvddrjedtrdeluddrleelnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptd enucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthgvtghhqdhlihhsthhsseiihiigshhtrdhn vght X-ME-Proxy: Received: from bastion.zyxst.net (bastion.zyxst.net [82.70.91.99]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 260E33064605 for ; Sun, 6 Sep 2020 15:15:47 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2020 20:15:18 +0100 From: tech-lists To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: onboard wireless on rpi4 Message-ID: <20200906191518.GC74236@bastion.zyxst.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org References: <5AF83D16-2432-4EA9-BC2F-373DA8BC3360@googlemail.com> <4306A90D-97B9-4DE9-A05A-A91B6F4A587F@yahoo.com> <8037E5D3-E89E-4AED-8FFE-43D9D83B2BD3@yahoo.com> <24CED3CF-6624-4CE3-A21C-D4BAD88E8812@googlemail.com> <5u2b7xt1_fm5BlXrwr9UEqnraMQDmFnYxCNVzbjJ8tM3MSYZ0Gh5k7TpiVOH4cZbEa6Sd4qQqicQDt4r_U5iXPRjodjwghbiKL55BHigEtM=@protonmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="c3bfwLpm8qysLVxt" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5u2b7xt1_fm5BlXrwr9UEqnraMQDmFnYxCNVzbjJ8tM3MSYZ0Gh5k7TpiVOH4cZbEa6Sd4qQqicQDt4r_U5iXPRjodjwghbiKL55BHigEtM=@protonmail.com> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Bl1N42dxfz4N63 X-Spamd-Bar: ----- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=zyxst.net header.s=fm3 header.b=Q6zC6uU8; dkim=pass header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm3 header.b=C67bCLtg; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of tech-lists@zyxst.net designates 66.111.4.27 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=tech-lists@zyxst.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-5.82 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[zyxst.net:s=fm3,messagingengine.com:s=fm3]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.99)[-0.986]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_GOOD(0.00)[66.111.4.27:from]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:66.111.4.27:c]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.20)[multipart/signed,text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-arm@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.98)[-0.979]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[zyxst.net]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[zyxst.net:+,messagingengine.com:+]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.16)[-1.159]; SIGNED_PGP(-2.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:11403, ipnet:66.111.4.0/24, country:US]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-arm]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[66.111.4.27:from] X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Sep 2020 19:15:49 -0000 --c3bfwLpm8qysLVxt Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Sep 06, 2020 at 06:15:35PM +0000, Robert Crowston via freebsd-arm w= rote: >Using only the lowest 1 GiB for DMA seems completely reliable. Perhaps I c= ould have a volunteer to test https://reviews.freebsd.org/D26344 ? btw is it still ok to use svn source? or does it neet to be git --=20 J. --c3bfwLpm8qysLVxt Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEE8n3tWhxW11Ccvv9/s8o7QhFzNAUFAl9VNU4ACgkQs8o7QhFz NAWcLQ/8DFntywvDQvlIahmy9bOlHgmSnjJcyFq2v9jhWQJKRD4iAvrQWH1Krq0+ iiurClSoNxDL46mCtgiDplSa54aYPRnsmg1oi8ub3+YfXyUamp6y1Q8efL8zHqHV Bl5qrUY5kGF63M5sHDew+N6C+VvpaNyH36RBkhiPfUXbjetRzerBUSrCw0PLYH/T OSM/1WGJRgWlbO06fwDveIMpRpt7x7LN1jTDFXRtZyciGQA2RVa8JyVEYvxD52Fa kad0LJsHfez1N6+7dyHvyk9foIgQHmN7tF8pugsbkU0596NZXLgRMy6cckchuDsK cabAN0YJIAYhezx9fghO+YHj7YN0oiEGNZEpbLy79lev3TZjl4f19tRGtIDCnZLu GwOnKNZjDKVeX0/t33FTACF5rla2lom3iF7AgcKnzARgc62j8MHUExRcWRbpfGB5 YrdUp0LjK7YjPoKV03+AaZ7u/jAiFUvM1VEM9wV6St5eKc2PfeeHpfNnDL3yrtNi rlQwuQxj/BxjSnrzsg8tmQ9Z/CBAIleqP9Tj4oVzjU2yDSSBFcbeFwgBCscwNZN7 f2RAiaepB/Sw8hta5A9vvnFKv6z6DVgmg8q3uqyy4BuNn0OQnM5Kco/6ReF6LfEd 5kw2hyuWwLt1t5u0/JrM1FMA5+GxqPNVJ1Td7nzPsZKLaqR267Q= =d9rs -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --c3bfwLpm8qysLVxt-- From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Sun Sep 6 20:11:13 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BFA73DC702 for ; Sun, 6 Sep 2020 20:11:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tech-lists@zyxst.net) Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Bl2c06Wq3z4QTx for ; Sun, 6 Sep 2020 20:11:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tech-lists@zyxst.net) Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 166365C0036 for ; Sun, 6 Sep 2020 16:11:12 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 06 Sep 2020 16:11:12 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zyxst.net; h= date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=fm3; bh=8RLkfv2c7XVNAhj4E+6mPV5jrRG Xwv1mPNn9sXSRSlo=; b=K93sxDS0gYxbnO2yWdntCtORvQwGMUVF/xMclbVQxws E6b38HIwLL9aZfE2+kXuC1AR94dj1Kks8VniNAilIz+UBAM1KGJZi81B+FwuC80E o61N+98Gz0oo8SlumWeYGyscju/n8bRengejkDrxZtoUr40KWfPd4ADnUQImEAAB XHMymlM3NQsh1e34G7aUW/67FfCNnLHjCyahdy4J+/IvY//gVYHxprLtLtfxxquO LnBNdnKh4gBODhHFQf+uemUX9XDeQqD/Z89mdDZ7UrYqKNBmfdKrY32Sg7QyUVyE TEfrFBBP+Zh4819e1AtekVk8PP3AaXuSlCDVGcef+bA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=8RLkfv 2c7XVNAhj4E+6mPV5jrRGXwv1mPNn9sXSRSlo=; b=DDFgISi+aLgJpVsv4hyIfN UrtaeCem52yDajSF4gCabRXKl2NpA9mdiu5SufMOlEh/lXdRQXLAXJytJnJRQB6I 98JqwULweEoVFDVuED8wbh16DIONPiGoXnfo7kV45TVeFyNmh6kKqA2kK+MNKnYY 0ISmgMg7neJ7o2dbaL34MXKfVIMWSWwlZzK+FKcH97qtYxDtffZWrpdvfUnZMhya cLkwzBSpF7mh0ucD208cZFlsuxr8bZPLwxOIN12WPMVLRiH1uf47rvdSi9OlGeLm USvXFxQDxQ6iemMlMqiAZRvxOiLiZzXPhM/TGauEjLCdRzlCjSCFbX/j4A5REZPA == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduiedrudegjedgudeglecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepfffhvffukfhfgggtuggjsehgtd erredttddvnecuhfhrohhmpehtvggthhdqlhhishhtshcuoehtvggthhdqlhhishhtshes iiihgihsthdrnhgvtheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnheptedttdduuefggeeghfekkeetke ejleefffelheejfffgffdtfeeftdejgeeuieffnecuffhomhgrihhnpehfrhgvvggsshgu rdhorhhgnecukfhppeekvddrjedtrdeluddrleelnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptd enucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthgvtghhqdhlihhsthhsseiihiigshhtrdhn vght X-ME-Proxy: Received: from bastion.zyxst.net (bastion.zyxst.net [82.70.91.99]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 6FF3C3064605 for ; Sun, 6 Sep 2020 16:11:11 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2020 21:10:42 +0100 From: tech-lists To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: onboard wireless on rpi4 Message-ID: <20200906201042.GA62420@bastion.zyxst.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org References: <5AF83D16-2432-4EA9-BC2F-373DA8BC3360@googlemail.com> <4306A90D-97B9-4DE9-A05A-A91B6F4A587F@yahoo.com> <8037E5D3-E89E-4AED-8FFE-43D9D83B2BD3@yahoo.com> <24CED3CF-6624-4CE3-A21C-D4BAD88E8812@googlemail.com> <5u2b7xt1_fm5BlXrwr9UEqnraMQDmFnYxCNVzbjJ8tM3MSYZ0Gh5k7TpiVOH4cZbEa6Sd4qQqicQDt4r_U5iXPRjodjwghbiKL55BHigEtM=@protonmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="EVF5PPMfhYS0aIcm" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5u2b7xt1_fm5BlXrwr9UEqnraMQDmFnYxCNVzbjJ8tM3MSYZ0Gh5k7TpiVOH4cZbEa6Sd4qQqicQDt4r_U5iXPRjodjwghbiKL55BHigEtM=@protonmail.com> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Bl2c06Wq3z4QTx X-Spamd-Bar: ----- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=zyxst.net header.s=fm3 header.b=K93sxDS0; dkim=pass header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm3 header.b=DDFgISi+; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of tech-lists@zyxst.net designates 66.111.4.27 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=tech-lists@zyxst.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-5.91 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[zyxst.net:s=fm3,messagingengine.com:s=fm3]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.99)[-0.989]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_GOOD(0.00)[66.111.4.27:from]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:66.111.4.27]; MIME_GOOD(-0.20)[multipart/signed,text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-arm@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.98)[-0.978]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[zyxst.net]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[zyxst.net:+,messagingengine.com:+]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.24)[-1.242]; SIGNED_PGP(-2.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:11403, ipnet:66.111.4.0/24, country:US]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-arm]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[66.111.4.27:from] X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Sep 2020 20:11:13 -0000 --EVF5PPMfhYS0aIcm Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Sep 06, 2020 at 06:15:35PM +0000, Robert Crowston via freebsd-arm w= rote: >Using only the lowest 1 GiB for DMA seems completely reliable. Perhaps I c= ould have a=20 >volunteer to test https://reviews.freebsd.org/D26344 ? Hi, OK the patch applied cleanly against 365389, now running make -j4 buildkern= el, so a few hrs thanks for the patch! :D --=20 J. --EVF5PPMfhYS0aIcm Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEE8n3tWhxW11Ccvv9/s8o7QhFzNAUFAl9VQlMACgkQs8o7QhFz NAVpKRAAlUnQaRg8EqO2vKI8Y0iPehIy4FzXFCZBOhcBp89GooyubCKdvonLBHkD 0TUpz+jCmVDh7FABClAjWV/OLNq6KQPkOTivJ5R/8Dx38jU9QHHrIDAm8a553WSV qec/HdqNvMfNlIqg6mFw5NDctSA3fLFe9Jo3KRuog6leVyIy5b/qnyJkdus1fmIk Qe4PUY+oHWi3JX1hI0FixHyo93dNh45BEEHa/OR84fj5ZLuGKlJ+p9l2FtaYFSrp sMbBFFn6XVaSxvV0XkwVA3LwVdIU+eIU6AaANkzdrNdr3MS9f6iF54spwKY27MKh /+iFK8hy756IlPobv0kDKosOxIdv814bmUqrn9MJDRhzXR9kGSBeBsjzmwl7vEyM 5QC9HuoGEfFBLpAh41hxGYKW0l+kgMIZn145IXYWhRUIx0vkhVRAY8YUnyWc/pgH sDbGl1vGG6751LFXdzMAZ3Cu0ETNAYpPKuIhyXUG9ykoO5WsAkyLi18z9dxYPbLG 80sK8TIrpHwdj0AR7ZYkdGjtVSEazOpSWmUDSpcNdg3s0yfe6vy9qEjFJpMm+rp1 3/kSG0/qK2NE4IHPTLokM1rMRZquYzHJ68o3lkh0rNQsuFa7m1gv2s6g3WfE31P1 oW+9/eOoa6I4rr7uTHxVIXPyzTOzA1CwUilCWqw/o6k/D7wne0Y= =Vmu8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --EVF5PPMfhYS0aIcm-- From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Mon Sep 7 00:03:37 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E2683E2E74 for ; Mon, 7 Sep 2020 00:03:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from shigeru@os-hackers.jp) Received: from mailssl04.asahi-net.or.jp (mailssl04.asahi-net.or.jp [202.224.55.63]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Bl7m80YzJz4f09 for ; Mon, 7 Sep 2020 00:03:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from shigeru@os-hackers.jp) Received: from localhost (w142149.ppp.asahi-net.or.jp [121.1.142.149]) (Authenticated sender: WJ8S-YMMT) by mailssl04.asahi-net.or.jp (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 90FD24005A; Mon, 7 Sep 2020 08:56:39 +0900 (JST) Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2020 08:56:33 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20200907.085633.2141392583021666979.shigeru@os-hackers.jp> To: tech-lists@zyxst.net Cc: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: rpi4 won't overclock From: YAMAMOTO Shigeru In-Reply-To: <20200906145758.GA74236@bastion.zyxst.net> References: <20200906145758.GA74236@bastion.zyxst.net> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.8 on Emacs 27.1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Bl7m80YzJz4f09 X-Spamd-Bar: +++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=softfail (mx1.freebsd.org: 202.224.55.63 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of shigeru@os-hackers.jp) smtp.mailfrom=shigeru@os-hackers.jp X-Spamd-Result: default: False [3.54 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; GREYLIST(0.00)[pass,body]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.85)[-0.852]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[os-hackers.jp]; R_SPF_SOFTFAIL(0.00)[~all:c]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.18)[0.175]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; VIOLATED_DIRECT_SPF(3.50)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.78)[-0.779]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MID_CONTAINS_FROM(1.00)[]; RCVD_NO_TLS_LAST(0.10)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:4685, ipnet:202.224.32.0/19, country:JP]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-arm] X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2020 00:03:37 -0000 >>>>> "tech-lists" == tech-lists writes: tech-lists> Hi, I can't oc the pi in the usual way with -current on tech-lists> rpi4. Obviously I'm doing something wrong, but I don't know tech-lists> what. Please enable 'powerd'. https://twitter.com/BsdHacker/status/1284090171684581378 ``` service powerd onestart ``` Thanks, --- YAMAMOTO Shigeru From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Mon Sep 7 00:30:49 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 429F63E492B for ; Mon, 7 Sep 2020 00:30:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from thomas-bsd@skibo.net) Received: from guinea.birch.relay.mailchannels.net (guinea.birch.relay.mailchannels.net [23.83.209.79]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Bl8MX0czHz4gdx for ; Mon, 7 Sep 2020 00:30:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from thomas-bsd@skibo.net) X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|thomas-bsd@skibo.net Received: from relay.mailchannels.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5732C70019D for ; Mon, 7 Sep 2020 00:30:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a50.g.dreamhost.com (100-96-22-78.trex.outbound.svc.cluster.local [100.96.22.78]) (Authenticated sender: dreamhost) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id B6BA87002F4 for ; Mon, 7 Sep 2020 00:30:44 +0000 (UTC) X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|thomas-bsd@skibo.net Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a50.g.dreamhost.com (pop.dreamhost.com [64.90.62.162]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384) by 0.0.0.0:2500 (trex/5.18.9); Mon, 07 Sep 2020 00:30:45 +0000 X-MC-Relay: Neutral X-MailChannels-SenderId: dreamhost|x-authsender|thomas-bsd@skibo.net X-MailChannels-Auth-Id: dreamhost X-Bored-Decisive: 5e97d6442f1736f8_1599438644960_412527284 X-MC-Loop-Signature: 1599438644960:1837341313 X-MC-Ingress-Time: 1599438644960 Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a50.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a50.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A46DB39DE for ; Sun, 6 Sep 2020 17:30:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=skibo.net; h=date:from:to :subject:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s=skibo.net; bh=Y oHzFkv1k+Vx09rwRRWmEkrpzgs=; b=wcjRgYYoOLBNkFg29/le2MC8/HtYwWPeZ HHy0yKaXiOZhOX1S+fGYz9aHYd6KGHFnXj28uUMYzXariUr6Ok8K7UvKk5org3aD e2Z5O+XhATJt0Xc5AvNULHyFbdiyMPy46U7xZ2Bz1MdoJJ10cLR0l943XyORTu9h s8ykEu1sik= Received: from bentley (c-98-35-230-191.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [98.35.230.191]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: thomas-bsd@skibo.net) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a50.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9A4C5B39D4 for ; Sun, 6 Sep 2020 17:30:43 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2020 17:30:39 -0700 X-DH-BACKEND: pdx1-sub0-mail-a50 From: Thomas Skibo To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: ti_scm_syscon driver Message-ID: <20200907003039.GA45956@bentley> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-VR-OUT-STATUS: OK X-VR-OUT-SCORE: 0 X-VR-OUT-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduiedrudegkedgfedvucetufdoteggodetrfdotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuggftfghnshhusghstghrihgsvgdpffftgfetoffjqffuvfenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpeffhffvuffkgggtugesthdtredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhmrghsucfukhhisghouceothhhohhmrghsqdgsshgusehskhhisghordhnvghtqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpedvheegleehgeefuefhfeeuteevveejudeuudduuedvhedvffettdfhheelieethfenucfkphepleekrdefhedrvdeftddrudeludenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhhouggvpehsmhhtphdphhgvlhhopegsvghnthhlvgihpdhinhgvthepleekrdefhedrvdeftddrudeluddprhgvthhurhhnqdhprghthhepvfhhohhmrghsucfukhhisghouceothhhohhmrghsqdgsshgusehskhhisghordhnvghtqedpmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehthhhomhgrshdqsghsugesshhkihgsohdrnhgvthdpnhhrtghpthhtohepfhhrvggvsghsugdqrghrmhesfhhrvggvsghsugdrohhrgh X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Bl8MX0czHz4gdx X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=skibo.net header.s=skibo.net header.b=wcjRgYYo; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of thomas-bsd@skibo.net designates 23.83.209.79 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=thomas-bsd@skibo.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.54 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[6]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[skibo.net:s=skibo.net]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:23.83.208.0/20]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-arm@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.001]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[skibo.net]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[skibo.net:+]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.57)[-0.568]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[23.83.209.79:from]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.98)[-0.975]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:36483, ipnet:23.83.208.0/21, country:CA]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-arm]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[23.83.209.79:from] X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2020 00:30:49 -0000 Hello. I am testing some code I have developed to provide the Zynq boards with a real clock driver and update the other device drivers to use the clock infrastructure. It is also supposed to allow us to use "upstream" gnu dts files. But, I ran into a problem booting a GENERIC kernel on my Zybo. The ti_scm_syscon driver, which has the "syscon" compatibility string, grabs the zynq-slcr node before my driver. The compatibility property for the node in the GNU dts file is; compatible = "xlnx,zynq-slcr", "syscon", "simple-mfd"; I fixed the problem by having my probe routine return DEVICE_PROBE_SPECIFIC. But, the DEVICE_PROBE(9) man page seems to say I shouldn't do this. Also, I see a lot of device nodes in other boards that have "syscon" along with their more specific driver name. Aren't they going to run into problems too if the ti_scm_syscon driver matches them? Should the ti_scm_syscon driver use a lower priority return value in its probe routine? --Thomas Skibo From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Mon Sep 7 00:31:49 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B7A73E45FA for ; Mon, 7 Sep 2020 00:31:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marklmi@yahoo.com) Received: from sonic308-8.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (sonic308-8.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com [98.137.68.32]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Bl8Nh3bxnz4gNV for ; Mon, 7 Sep 2020 00:31:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marklmi@yahoo.com) X-YMail-OSG: tZO1hvUVM1kx3QdbcmFDfaUeLMRBlRgCFqafgvOQcNLJLpHfeZMSj5gSetxNCKO 8nx.0aaFDsCUoDd3U9CyilnzmI6LB0EIFzACtIY8zgV8HLTPaWCPj7fEi7STLP5opp8qY7zHOBry RndYUzn3IbISL7Aprczouk0m5Z8nPr0vgzlcHkU_QlNMV7ZaTomaqwM_Af9I4p4mLXJeSxH_1Zxt iL0.Plt97vIE_oGCZlXiZ7W88n6_.dP4wwaFfF8h3H4mTM0xPcpx9jPmcvKLY0jGSlOnChlfDxCb E6cYgJal9azxlN9QDOtj_Xrt1pzX12JvazjQnalCxVMQiWfxIpbt4pImGo6yM2SrF5H5gbD19vUC qO6xpFhDxrJ6rzqZvWHe9cHelnP5p99XoJ4NGZPxRTFgZYeBVMX50JnCR7aTKGN9eCnsBvlWd_1d VnvBvGj6YdE3PNXMO0l.FJlWT4HcUI2MLAhJpXmCQnpXodWoMXhXQ1ezC5o09Mix_EFfD5AHy2Sy tb8tIxzhHWMezE02J91.b0u7LPuozfFgg.3.fxetuOQfNckxuuMQpqzTPYgYvH_Ue5eAMxl5NS0K zbaYGJEQYXKjXGqrTOSQXeY0W53WJzgSlvNOW2gVUqJBoO9QxBWSvlh6vO7oSeoQKreNNwmF4sSg dI113i_F6CZ2IOhVb9hlEWXRzrhxvNZMLJFzGYCqH3aVSTf2mLOGi_RSXJi6S_IhhRSXuPwJtW85 yfHKzhp.kTt9eX.PENx5atiLHHYTKHBnzJymc7crP9c1kaXgJdkDofJvsAuG90rEE2kMz_cRv_OW A_9GTsgYP.8h0NhssrkpnPHqx61hoyYoqPa5QVR4h.ALIAzbos1rUGRYe9hW_879e5f4MluXzKaV 1tD5EhSd4aoKbTWkkDPpxBVGMcWdXjKAZVZCiW6TFpJKYr16DaLzobljdO.V5_SJB6FIE3ykktkg WpHffGpO0makL0HX1QAtryt9yxwL.fnBMBBcQ_yUig8gjCdz1ehVSv.XQbccArpDdZ7BWG5q6qT0 Q392olk24Mawjq5fPgP09Iwibttk446zAazn7lZbRIybOXhzem5P.lQGSb488rpIX1bZfF7UaXi. plvXGuixatyH0.ZsJEViJCX909RafNJ.wIzFwTK_M1pvmQNOzPox.sc8yHoudF10zrm2_rFzQjMV cIxZArIuQJtb2oLmIucRapSxOsBtH8E0xDD7EUnFeFDrG_Q4FDPPfNoB9qUx0Bpl8PAmFF7he3bA fGbXtCiHdZQ_i5Yrzx913TzK7C8vM_D.pfO2Rpo939RP7SquhMXGPYkCeiYLb5yOywUs4KyjVOUT I6gH73gTjdAak92aK6rg4FPO.lWsSpjvjJASZe4SXS1iQwR2Rbe5oQ4S0qolo.IqyBGmtF2EVWjl oZ2KcocOetfXY3NnAhcTr.Dv0xn6pUNm.uz6JamEcc0TsZJTxS5lNImMD1wCZeHdEPP5q94eI7fw hs5cmXoJUcnjV_Gw_S.aUxFpl4qWjzosFKsjbL1ahNC0Vr03fHgt2PXHDoXefD6q_BV499yWiugM r Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic308.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with HTTP; Mon, 7 Sep 2020 00:31:46 +0000 Received: by smtp401.mail.ne1.yahoo.com (VZM Hermes SMTP Server) with ESMTPA ID ba9f6566c0077fac2d2cec4154228ee1; Mon, 07 Sep 2020 00:31:43 +0000 (UTC) From: Mark Millard Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.1\)) Subject: Re: rpi4 won't overclock Message-Id: <2F772350-6832-44CE-BCB4-F877173D320A@yahoo.com> Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2020 17:31:42 -0700 To: freebsd-arm , tech-lists X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.1) References: <2F772350-6832-44CE-BCB4-F877173D320A.ref@yahoo.com> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Bl8Nh3bxnz4gNV X-Spamd-Bar: ---- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.03 / 15.00]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[yahoo.com]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ptr:yahoo.com]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[yahoo.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[yahoo.com,reject]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.51)[-1.508]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[yahoo.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:36647, ipnet:98.137.64.0/20, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[yahoo.com:dkim]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.02)[-1.024]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[yahoo.com:s=s2048]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.003]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[98.137.68.32:from]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[98.137.68.32:from]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-arm] X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2020 00:31:49 -0000 tech-lists tech-lists at zyxst.net wrote on Sun Sep 6 14:58:30 UTC 2020 : > I can't oc the pi in the usual way with -current on rpi4. Obviously = I'm doing > something wrong, but I don't know what. >=20 > If I put parameters in config_rpi4.txt, they're seemingly ignored. Yep: config_rpi4.txt is just an example of what the config.txt file contents should be like for a RPi4B. FreeBSD is not using the [...] notation to be selective about what applies to what context and is not using the include mechanism. So use of config.txt tailoring is involved. > If I take > these out of there and put them instead at the bottom of config.txt, = the pi > will fail to boot (I think it's failing u-boot, it says, in VGA, it = needs > newer firmware). Have you tried making config.txt a strict copy of config_rip4.txt with no other changes and it still fails to boot? Note: My context is based on head -r363590 . > I've installed to rpi4 as per >=20 > = https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arm/2020-August/022162.html This is not what I've done since I experiment with uefi/ACPI based booting and such. Even back when I tried u-boot I did not do it the above way. (I've not tracked the u-boot based contexts in some time.) This paragraph mostly is just noting that I'm of limited/no help on those details. > The parameters I want to use are: >=20 > arm_freq=3D2100 > gpu_freq=3D750 > over_voltage=3D6 Last I knew, u-boot style booting ignored/overrides what config.txt has for the likes of arm_freq and probably more. It is set up for changing settings from FreeBSD later --but FreeBSD may have no equivalent of over_voltage=3D6 for all I know. (The FreeBSD u-boot based RPi3B that I have access to behaves similarly for FreeBSD. boot -s always ends up at a 600 MHz before something I put in /etc/sysctl.conf changes the setting.) The uefi/ACPI alternative for the RPi4B does use use the config.txt settings, even as seen via boot -s. (This is the environment I normally experiment with for the RPi4B.) I use over_voltage=3D6 and arm_freq=3D2000 on multiple RPi4B's. (I do = not adjust gpu_freq.) This makes the clock rate match a MACCHIATObin Double Shot and has been reliable on the RPi4B's (4 GiB and 8 GiB). (Memory subsystem properties make the MACCHIATObin faster at various activities.) I did do some margin testing initially and figures around 2100 were not reliable for keeping the RPi4B's operating. Of course, various things can contribute to what setting work with some margin for environment variability. I've got heatsinks, fans, and (apparently) good power. So far as I know, using the uefi/ACPI and the over_voltage=3D6 and arm_freq=3D2000 leads to a context that runs at an essentially fixed frequency, even when idle. > Even with make -j4 it sits stubbornly at 0.6GHz. It has been a long time since I've tried u-boot based for the RPi4B. For the OPi+2E, Rock64, RPi3B I use in /etc/sysctl.conf : dev.cpu.0.freq=3D1008 # OPi+2E dev.cpu.0.freq=3D1200 # Rock64 and RPi3B but for the RPi4B with the uefi/ACPI style boot process there is no sysctl dev.cpu.0.freq to assign or inspect. So far as I know, the dev.cpu.0.freq assignments lead to fix frequency operation: as I have not done anything explicit to cause dynamic changes. Again: heatsinks, fans, and good power. I'll note that my experiments with timing rebuilds (from scratch) ended up with times being shortest for -j3 for the RPi4B. (Not surprising given the memory subsystem properties from what I can tell.) > The cpu is usually below 40 > degC in a 20 degC environment. It'll go to 46 degC when make = buildkernel runs. >=20 > I've tried much lower parameters with the same result. What am I doing = wrong? Overall, I do not know. But maybe some of the above will be of use. =3D=3D=3D Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away in early 2018-Mar) From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Mon Sep 7 08:40:23 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C8AC3EC608 for ; Mon, 7 Sep 2020 08:40:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from oskar.holmlund@yahoo.com) Received: from sonic303-19.consmr.mail.ir2.yahoo.com (sonic303-19.consmr.mail.ir2.yahoo.com [77.238.178.200]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BlMDQ3KLpz3ZX5 for ; Mon, 7 Sep 2020 08:40:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from oskar.holmlund@yahoo.com) X-YMail-OSG: ZnzMc7AVM1lysAqie6BnJutnW2_kpECu83wOBfy69M5Pmfo_UQM0aFl5zWmoyfv ilmez8cuCqbuSeHNnAbzEm_aWKbF4E5Q7WDGV4dgUklEi0eJudsco9Au6aN.y1USEshW0iOyZomD 3s5cUdwMobkHJSbdnGDhvg35pBfE8MWyCutN3Xb2JH.RQQQAK1rF0vwN07BFgqn_Kp17RQNlBIvz 5Wu_G2VBYXtEOmncKfo643E4P8sGVaeGBnKgpMseSfyAHYejBRYdaHwo7HrXemef6Hw1OWGf2EYO wj3YEzTvLsQHftrJ2M_e9oDQ0cdpjYxksXTsFCCMVwrKbIn.61KvaxNNO6BYpELxyiJxW1oFXWmL tfZ8GPMl58pvv17C6Jc2Ezh4FJGDGvV9vZcNZJ3qdkp8LKoOYjNsj4bLO0tKP584inwOqOzRCPGA FRS4bUVqNJRMNb4sQ3ojN7PQfm0d87LdMKUsVZdJAMrIC_tG.LSD.XpkEhC98Fk6EFRbRuWBeH9d svVCYA9JqSHY7C5EJmQRG8_YdLIWiUtvprMXxeg_E3vQ.7jMNGmcNsmlC0RVSOHWbSUq5J5NSVzR GuegIRAHcHLrk0Ud9DmY.o2ZfXXBUT2DNRHsZ8AzfixrfCz2fN11oYiBtLNaao8mt0RK9cLKd39g r3XvOcaQ.cRZjQap4LLgKkchSwosBiWYTuDeLoeOV50MQhPesaalUkiiC63e7VLB5NOBwtfmuZgA DTNds5TUncQVLnUUUb0hS00oZauBKhDM_JDxklDjaPltyorm73veuSE32yKAJ40NxSn2m5LYrbZJ tRD9.dVXTd4YymKXjIHxF1R3BVjeNc2Yt.oIuazJcQL1e_x5.6l8ov1yRkHY1KmsN2BoRStcLGun auBPiS9hjnKSWRX.zkrR1Mk.GjHeOlDR3OfXc3Cj4Tq4rCyjFlW57IGMUilYjye2Z93CK_dwOyzm _xyD4KPN2HUuStnM4KN2dXvQSJQCzVrvwQfUoHMXIkBQG0CXyM5etm9_qtMR5rCzuYIJ7dcXl.b2 gum3OOnuXFLKvgkJA0VfriZY8dUxCuKIDsGBMw45.8Jzs0lOpBksEjWoD3ZzAhZkFIsILRfP9.Y6 _7fMyt7iWvBGymyAcOVdMxvpPfgDc_ZgRnP9kZfqa3Kxd3KWXwKJ.gwoa7iIxUKC52PuxfvWPoCc qHU7PZ105xQzUdR8GFngDVpLqVtUiE.bAUmJHxz2sn21VHvBrJwJOp5Dz4lDM3LGHkvEvAPcD4jm 23mBi9fp6TbbZFhe0bY5ZDJHs5ga4_ZE7un4bh_0ipSCbf14OmRoqpfmR_P3.wiw8DoEjLIGetnv Z.XtYAcmLEB49XfnR2A80DbYjj.vitt_qInjIS4NRugHfULfPD8AJy_FM9FYhQ69OU3ILm7mq_mq L.BnbOkC.gxK9FPDcJs17Yy05R0Ff0A-- Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic303.consmr.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with HTTP; Mon, 7 Sep 2020 08:40:19 +0000 Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2020 08:40:19 +0000 (UTC) From: Oskar Holmlund To: "freebsd-arm@freebsd.org" , Thomas Skibo Message-ID: <1637384248.2885428.1599468019032@mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20200907003039.GA45956@bentley> References: <20200907003039.GA45956@bentley> Subject: Re: ti_scm_syscon driver MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: WebService/1.1.16565 YMailNorrin Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux x86_64; rv:80.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/80.0 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BlMDQ3KLpz3ZX5 X-Spamd-Bar: --- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.83 / 15.00]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_SOME(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[yahoo.com:s=s2048]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[77.238.178.200:from]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[yahoo.com]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ptr:yahoo.com]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.001]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.999]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[yahoo.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[77.238.178.200:from]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.83)[-0.825]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[yahoo.com,reject]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[yahoo.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:34010, ipnet:77.238.176.0/22, country:GB]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-arm]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[yahoo.com:dkim] X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2020 08:40:23 -0000 Den m=C3=A5ndag 7 september 2020 02:30:57 CEST, Thomas Skibo skrev:=20 Hello. I am testing some code I have developed to provide the Zynq boards with a real clock driver and update the other device drivers to use the clock infrastructure.=C2=A0 It is also supposed to allow us to use "upstream" gnu dts files.=C2=A0 But, I ran into a problem booting a GENERIC kernel on my Z= ybo. The ti_scm_syscon driver, which has the "syscon" compatibility string, grabs the zynq-slcr node before my driver.=C2=A0 The compatibility property for the node in the GNU dts file is; =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 compatible =3D "xlnx,zynq-slcr", "syscon", "simple-mfd"; I fixed the problem by having my probe routine return DEVICE_PROBE_SPECIFIC= . But, the DEVICE_PROBE(9) man page seems to say I shouldn't do this.=C2=A0 A= lso, I see a lot of device nodes in other boards that have "syscon" along with the= ir more specific driver name.=C2=A0 Aren't they going to run into problems too= if the ti_scm_syscon driver matches them?=C2=A0 Should the ti_scm_syscon drive= r use a lower priority return value in its probe routine? --Thomas Skibo _______________________________________________ freebsd-arm@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arm-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Hi Thomas, I'm sorry I've caused you trouble with ti_scm_syscon.c catchall for syscon. I will try to point out the situation from TI dts. (head) sys/gnu/dts/arm/am33xx-l4.dtsi from line 270 the control module are = defined and 286 the syscon part. The Control module are described here https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/omap/ctrl.= txt the syscon part is not directly documented for TI its just there in the exa= mple. (of course this exist https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/devicetree/b= indings/mfd/syscon.txt ) I'm glad for any suggestions to solve the issue to not interfere with other= drivers. I can test your proposal to lower the priority. Or get TI to change syscon to something more specific in the DTS? Maybe its better if i hardcode ti_scm.c to add the syscon child and remove = the probe part from ti_scm_syscon.c? Other suggestions? -- B=C3=A4sta H=C3=A4lsningar Oskar Holmlund Tel 070-3220292 From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Mon Sep 7 09:56:40 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C713D3ED4F2 for ; Mon, 7 Sep 2020 09:56:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from meloun.michal@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wr1-x441.google.com (mail-wr1-x441.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::441]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BlNwR4PJbz3dqj for ; Mon, 7 Sep 2020 09:56:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from meloun.michal@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wr1-x441.google.com with SMTP id z1so15171555wrt.3 for ; Mon, 07 Sep 2020 02:56:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:reply-to:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=FtHwrttbrlZe5X6CJcUfrvZBGstuL3CbWNZYVWCbm+w=; b=BVa9zFX9RHkO6xunKLruHalcL1L/syoBymnQdxaM29I4GUXf3PYnT7Z66T6/VF7f43 ya1GdEtRpIN0qwNykZbeslKLqAfTqklq9fF2cLQ1GBTiHgLvi5gD/U7aIb6gCSTme2fM 1PISff4ehttUcIwXt7ij5erlWc+LtJFtjjoZ1vLQhefrndliVPhZHTcB+vJ+a4s7ATO4 dg0METmktB30h1H9GKtpCotWvh6+EkSWapxxshNEuSckq6IZkeem333tXmqmTI5+Vz5M sXkXZnrM4kci2SCfYs3DoM+eBLPA2izlBkAmwSOB9FhSoJWm7Cf+mv4amYXil2aFm86m 6kug== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:reply-to:subject:to:references:from :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=FtHwrttbrlZe5X6CJcUfrvZBGstuL3CbWNZYVWCbm+w=; b=j7s86z57Mg4P0+igJUKTLK8UQoJIW127yxyXN3h8X1BO2xzOu88PE1FXS3zm3mVLGR RprIgOudLgAmAxgnwC0+4DqlluVusp7nhZeYK3jQbIa/HXLLjKkv6AqAgNbpQ2H6fYlF eDThZHEgnf9VWtsYocye2ANd6IHW3i9kf8GdhIJ5jRvdP5c+AGzH9HQr6gCcbe2Y0Kmc +qRE7itai/SAne2JuRXjqcZYxsX3JYeD0OpDCfBV9TWjm2pHQ6RuDcgusAir1qlf0t/W UG8XM+ZI91hS/gGyeQGTyMrLfEZJsIyeubEruM71Ir3vcKXklaU/iA1WdFfCt3EKfMyq qqWA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532RH2MYgcn6wyRu5aB3cOtK3GKwUD6gWFvSBdM+r33IPlzxJMUU mAKDKQSImg+tOcm6Iwho2itWY07xFFM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw0YAXIg1+g1EnJWEZAX7xI+BLbCG6zYZwPQkcGQWT1ZkNYiz/bhi+HJjrPoMCZgj9Cz0nsOQ== X-Received: by 2002:adf:fed1:: with SMTP id q17mr19941831wrs.85.1599472598227; Mon, 07 Sep 2020 02:56:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [88.208.79.100] (halouny.humusoft.cz. [88.208.79.100]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l8sm27889988wrx.22.2020.09.07.02.56.37 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 07 Sep 2020 02:56:37 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Michal Meloun Reply-To: meloun.michal@gmail.com Subject: Re: ti_scm_syscon driver To: Oskar Holmlund , "freebsd-arm@freebsd.org" , Thomas Skibo References: <20200907003039.GA45956@bentley> <1637384248.2885428.1599468019032@mail.yahoo.com> From: Michal Meloun Message-ID: Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2020 11:56:39 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.12.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1637384248.2885428.1599468019032@mail.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BlNwR4PJbz3dqj X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=BVa9zFX9; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of melounmichal@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4864:20::441 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=melounmichal@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.29 / 15.00]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[meloun.michal@gmail.com]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a00:1450:4000::/36]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.28)[-0.283]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[yahoo.com,freebsd.org,skibo.net]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2a00:1450::/32, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com:dkim]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.99)[-0.990]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.02)[-1.015]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; FREEMAIL_REPLYTO(0.00)[gmail.com]; REPLYTO_DOM_EQ_FROM_DOM(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-arm@freebsd.org]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2a00:1450:4864:20::441:from]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-arm] X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2020 09:56:40 -0000 On 07.09.2020 10:40, Oskar Holmlund via freebsd-arm wrote: > Den mÃ¥ndag 7 september 2020 02:30:57 CEST, Thomas Skibo skrev: > > Hello. > > I am testing some code I have developed to provide the Zynq boards with > a real clock driver and update the other device drivers to use the clock > infrastructure.  It is also supposed to allow us to use "upstream" gnu > dts files.  But, I ran into a problem booting a GENERIC kernel on my Zybo. > The ti_scm_syscon driver, which has the "syscon" compatibility string, > grabs the zynq-slcr node before my driver.  The compatibility property > for the node in the GNU dts file is; > >     compatible = "xlnx,zynq-slcr", "syscon", "simple-mfd"; > > I fixed the problem by having my probe routine return DEVICE_PROBE_SPECIFIC. > But, the DEVICE_PROBE(9) man page seems to say I shouldn't do this.  Also, I > see a lot of device nodes in other boards that have "syscon" along with their > more specific driver name.  Aren't they going to run into problems too if > the ti_scm_syscon driver matches them?  Should the ti_scm_syscon driver use > a lower priority return value in its probe routine? > > --Thomas Skibo > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-arm@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arm-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > Hi Thomas, > > I'm sorry I've caused you trouble with ti_scm_syscon.c catchall for syscon. > > I will try to point out the situation from TI dts. > (head) sys/gnu/dts/arm/am33xx-l4.dtsi from line 270 the control module are defined and 286 the syscon part. > The Control module are described here > https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/omap/ctrl.txt > the syscon part is not directly documented for TI its just there in the example. > (of course this exist https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/syscon.txt ) > > I'm glad for any suggestions to solve the issue to not interfere with other drivers. > I can test your proposal to lower the priority. > Or get TI to change syscon to something more specific in the DTS? > Maybe its better if i hardcode ti_scm.c to add the syscon child and remove the probe part from ti_scm_syscon.c? > Other suggestions? > I completely overlooked this problem in review, sorry for that. I think that we should delete ti_scm_syscon driver at all - it doesn't contain a single bit of TI specific code and it incorrectly steals pure "syscon" compatibility string. Instead, we should expand existing existing extres/syscon_generic driver and teach it about „simple-bus" compatibility string. Exactly as we already do in fdt/simple_mfd driver. Thomas, priority returned by bus_probe method works only for drivers probed at same bus_pass (in other word, bus_pass have precedence over priority returned by bus_probe() method. That’s also mean that more specific syscon driver must be probed at BUS_PASS_DEFAULT bus pass or earlier. Both fact (priority interference with bus pass and very late syscon instantiation - syscon should be one of first drivers available) looks like bugs for me... I will try to fix existing syscon_generic ASAP. Michal From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Mon Sep 7 13:14:35 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2B7A3C967F for ; Mon, 7 Sep 2020 13:14:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ronald-lists@klop.ws) Received: from smtp-relay-int.realworks.nl (smtp-relay-int.realworks.nl [194.109.157.24]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BlTJp3FbHz45KL for ; Mon, 7 Sep 2020 13:14:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ronald-lists@klop.ws) Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2020 15:14:28 +0200 (CEST) From: Ronald Klop To: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" Cc: Klaus Cucinauomo , freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Message-ID: <507782579.41.1599484468967@localhost> In-Reply-To: <09959D86-E3E3-43E9-8134-C2FC73343DBA@lists.zabbadoz.net> References: <20200904134619.GB80905@bastion.zyxst.net> <69934262-D9D3-4986-849D-9E8221D1E387@kronometrix.org> <1677459627.55.1599232125847@localhost> <75E08DC2-D229-45AA-85AE-CCF06FD0B490@kronometrix.org> <09959D86-E3E3-43E9-8134-C2FC73343DBA@lists.zabbadoz.net> Subject: MMCCAM - Re: onboard wireless on rpi4 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Realworks (524.618.64b72a99ed0) Importance: Normal X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BlTJp3FbHz45KL X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of ronald-lists@klop.ws designates 194.109.157.24 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=ronald-lists@klop.ws X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.51 / 15.00]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_VERYGOOD(0.00)[194.109.157.24:from]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:194.109.157.0/24]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[klop.ws]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.97)[-0.968]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.79)[-0.791]; HAS_X_PRIO_THREE(0.00)[3]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[194.109.157.24:from]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.95)[-0.946]; RCVD_COUNT_ZERO(0.00)[0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; ASN(0.00)[asn:3265, ipnet:194.109.0.0/16, country:NL]; FREEMAIL_CC(0.00)[googlemail.com,freebsd.org]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-arm] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.33 X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2020 13:14:35 -0000 =20 Van: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" Datum: zaterdag, 5 september 2020 14:15 Aan: Klaus Cucinauomo CC: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Onderwerp: Re: onboard wireless on rpi4 >=20 > On 4 Sep 2020, at 17:35, Klaus Cucinauomo via freebsd-arm wrote: >=20 > > Yep, my question if really no one else is working on it, was directed >= to Bj=C3=B6rn ;-), > > because I don=E2=80=99t want to work on a completely different > implem= entation, > > if Bj=C3=B6rn is perhaps a few steps further. >=20 > SDIO attach worked last year; WiFi (cfg80211) wasn=E2=80=99t finished. = And I am not tired of hearing people ask for it. You have all the right to= do so. >=20 > I recently got a PCIe card (different bus attachment) but it should help = to move forward on the WiFi parts as well. Yes, it is a free time project = at the moment but it also benefits from other ongoing WiFi work. >=20 >=20 > Two things which may help for the RPi/SDIO parts are: >=20 > - please try and use MMCCAM kernels and help, test, debug, report, .. all= the things you find so (other people) can jump in as well so we can switch= that on as default. Without that, no SDIO. >=20 > - in case you are not only into RPi, the nanopi/rk33xx platforms with onb= oard SDIO WiFi need tiny little glue bits to turn the bits on; would be gr= eat if someone could just do that. >=20 >=20 > Bjoern > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-arm@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arm-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >=20 >=20 >=20 Hi, I've MMCCAM running since 12.1-BETA1 on rpi3B+. No problems so far. Apparently I'm to only one :-) https://dmesgd.nycbug.org/index.cgi?do=3Dind= ex&fts=3Dmmccam Regards, Ronald. =20 From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Mon Sep 7 14:42:47 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C72F3CB992 for ; Mon, 7 Sep 2020 14:42:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tech-lists@zyxst.net) Received: from wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BlWGZ3ncYz4CW6 for ; Mon, 7 Sep 2020 14:42:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tech-lists@zyxst.net) Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5F355E6 for ; Mon, 7 Sep 2020 10:42:42 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 07 Sep 2020 10:42:43 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zyxst.net; h= date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=fm3; bh=IDPtdhMkuMrm6IoC2UaKh5B160r UiMIlthp2J2AkLsE=; b=gJA3+TrZOvSE/r3g740JtSiEe1as494jc3MfS7QJHJw OZPrzm9+dB6GkUysa+1q8OQeiIAmTTTDRiGIn+KF4Lj4QvH7e9A6v2o7b1KM3Msp fLg7PBxf7kAsJkapylMAq4jBg1LlsQ3BU/+DoHA+Q7FgFRoj+SvaWk48ErdM0KOQ MKcYiSM1yBaX/pKY+XMRMPc2ueUJ7f+k93sg3sM0bWgyw2Yv0a+Ie2zOav1Bfrnk FcV7JYuEmWehGhqECqsyKNcd2o9gSm9qsrB6CY0LvPJuim1xlarwdX30CpE5T4N9 NAm7s00JoogFldIyQRarh32BI/+Xelf5vEyaJQnXe0A== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=IDPtdh MkuMrm6IoC2UaKh5B160rUiMIlthp2J2AkLsE=; b=bSXQw7UMgJ4U1Ed/7WCIbD QEllONK5DX6qaHFj9oib1uj/r1rp/B29rco3+arcd/zIY+LDwtgqIkEyupRf02MS n8m+VQXBeFrIF3FoWqxa/7zhL4BuJBoQVuE4CYoueYzPtGmL5fzmcGtVNmocFVln PzNYqler45l+knKAQh5HgXznRikQysEZ7cRIA3DKKb1VTiysfarKEAQPyaloZYXE HK7lxrHjnmFUypu8OyE89DiBTg+eOJsA9RYe9foBucgvMAzL5TyRDmcsjBvdony/ QfxzuRfWeYXZJ2936x0ylpxKxRom31pxgtRQW0hN+OGaelQdyqoa4EYAV80R7jrw == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduiedrudehtddgkeduucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpeffhffvuffkfhggtggujgesghdtre ertddtvdenucfhrhhomhepthgvtghhqdhlihhsthhsuceothgvtghhqdhlihhsthhsseii hiigshhtrdhnvghtqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeejgfegfeejgfeludfhveetiefhje euvedtjeeltdegffevveeuiedugeejkeevgfenucffohhmrghinhepiiihgihsthdrnhgv thdpfhhrvggvsghsugdrohhrghenucfkphepkedvrdejtddrledurdelleenucevlhhush htvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehtvggthhdqlhhishht shesiiihgihsthdrnhgvth X-ME-Proxy: Received: from bastion.zyxst.net (bastion.zyxst.net [82.70.91.99]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id CDB5A306467D for ; Mon, 7 Sep 2020 10:42:41 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2020 15:42:12 +0100 From: tech-lists To: freebsd-arm Subject: Re: rpi4 won't overclock Message-ID: <20200907144212.GB62420@bastion.zyxst.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-arm References: <2F772350-6832-44CE-BCB4-F877173D320A.ref@yahoo.com> <2F772350-6832-44CE-BCB4-F877173D320A@yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="61jdw2sOBCFtR2d/" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2F772350-6832-44CE-BCB4-F877173D320A@yahoo.com> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BlWGZ3ncYz4CW6 X-Spamd-Bar: ----- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=zyxst.net header.s=fm3 header.b=gJA3+TrZ; dkim=pass header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm3 header.b=bSXQw7UM; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of tech-lists@zyxst.net designates 64.147.123.25 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=tech-lists@zyxst.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-5.05 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_GOOD(0.00)[64.147.123.25:from]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:64.147.123.25]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[zyxst.net:+,messagingengine.com:+]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.41)[-0.413]; SIGNED_PGP(-2.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:11403, ipnet:64.147.123.0/24, country:US]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[64.147.123.25:from]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.97)[-0.970]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[zyxst.net:s=fm3,messagingengine.com:s=fm3]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; SH_EMAIL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[0.0.0.0:email]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.96)[-0.963]; MIME_GOOD(-0.20)[multipart/signed,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-arm@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[zyxst.net]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; DBL_PROHIBIT(0.00)[0.0.0.0:email]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-arm] X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2020 14:42:47 -0000 --61jdw2sOBCFtR2d/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, On Sun, Sep 06, 2020 at 05:31:15PM -0700, Mark Millard wrote: >tech-lists tech-lists at zyxst.net wrote on >Sun Sep 6 14:58:30 UTC 2020 : > >> I can't oc the pi in the usual way with -current on rpi4. Obviously I'm = doing >> something wrong, but I don't know what. >> >> If I put parameters in config_rpi4.txt, they're seemingly ignored. > >Yep: config_rpi4.txt is just an example of what the config.txt file >contents should be like for a RPi4B. FreeBSD is not using the [...] >notation to be selective about what applies to what context and is >not using the include mechanism. > >So use of config.txt tailoring is involved. > >> If I take >> these out of there and put them instead at the bottom of config.txt, the= pi >> will fail to boot (I think it's failing u-boot, it says, in VGA, it needs >> newer firmware). > >Have you tried making config.txt a strict copy of config_rip4.txt >with no other changes and it still fails to boot? Yes, just tried that. It will boot but it fails to boot if I set overclocki= ng parameters in config.txt. I get to a screen that complains about newer firmware. It doesn= 't get as far as u-boot. I took the card out and amended it on another machine, then put it back in the rpi4. It boots, and config.txt looks like this: arm_control=3D0x200 arm_64bit=3D1 dtoverlay=3Ddisable-bt dtoverlay=3Dmmc device_tree_address=3D0x4000 kernel=3Du-boot.bin armstub=3Darmstub8-gic.bin #gpu_mem=3D16 #over_voltage=3D6 #arm_freq=3D2100 >Note: My context is based on head -r363590 . I'm now using r365391 on the pi4 > >> I've installed to rpi4 as per >> >> https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arm/2020-August/022162.html > >This is not what I've done since I experiment with uefi/ACPI >based booting and such. Even back when I tried u-boot I did >not do it the above way. (I've not tracked the u-boot based >contexts in some time.) This paragraph mostly is just noting >that I'm of limited/no help on those details. > >> The parameters I want to use are: >> >> arm_freq=3D2100 >> gpu_freq=3D750 >> over_voltage=3D6 > >Last I knew, u-boot style booting ignored/overrides what config.txt has >for the likes of arm_freq and probably more. It is set up for changing >settings from FreeBSD later --but FreeBSD may have no equivalent of >over_voltage=3D6 for all I know. (The FreeBSD u-boot based RPi3B that I >have access to behaves similarly for FreeBSD. boot -s always ends >up at a 600 MHz before something I put in /etc/sysctl.conf changes >the setting.) On my rpi3 12.1-STABLE r363237 GENERIC I have the following in /boot/msdos/config.txt: arm_control=3D0x200 dtparam=3Daudio=3Don,i2c_arm=3Don,spi=3Don dtoverlay=3Dmmc dtoverlay=3Dpwm dtoverlay=3Ddisable-bt device_tree_address=3D0x4000 kernel=3Du-boot.bin #force_turbo=3D1 gpu_mem=3D16 arm_freq=3D1500 over_voltage=3D4 which normally gives 1.5GHz under load, nothing in /etc/sysctl.conf is sett= ing this parameter. I have just enabled powerd and rebooted, but it hasn't come back so I suspect in my case it's applying config.txt but there's a powerd = <-> config.txt interaction happening preventing it from booting. >The uefi/ACPI alternative for the RPi4B does use use the config.txt >settings, even as seen via boot -s. (This is the environment I >normally experiment with for the RPi4B.) > >I use over_voltage=3D6 and arm_freq=3D2000 on multiple RPi4B's. (I do not >adjust gpu_freq.) This makes the clock rate match a MACCHIATObin Double >Shot and has been reliable on the RPi4B's (4 GiB and 8 GiB). (Memory >subsystem properties make the MACCHIATObin faster at various >activities.) > >I did do some margin testing initially and figures around 2100 were >not reliable for keeping the RPi4B's operating. Of course, various >things can contribute to what setting work with some margin for >environment variability. I've got heatsinks, fans, and (apparently) >good power. I'm using dedicated power supplies made for rpi3 and rpi4. Am using heatsin= ks on the rpi3 in a clear plastic case on the rpi3 and a FLIRC aluminium heats= ink case on the rpi4. >So far as I know, using the uefi/ACPI and the over_voltage=3D6 and >arm_freq=3D2000 leads to a context that runs at an essentially fixed >frequency, even when idle. > >> Even with make -j4 it sits stubbornly at 0.6GHz. > >It has been a long time since I've tried u-boot based for >the RPi4B. I have now got it to 1500 thanks to https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arm/2020-September/022279.html The very highest temperature it got to was 61 degC in 25 degC ambient with make -j4 buildworld >For the OPi+2E, Rock64, RPi3B I use in /etc/sysctl.conf : > >dev.cpu.0.freq=3D1008 # OPi+2E >dev.cpu.0.freq=3D1200 # Rock64 and RPi3B I'll try that on the rpi3. Do you use powerd? on either rpi3 or rpi4. =20 >but for the RPi4B with the uefi/ACPI style boot process there >is no sysctl dev.cpu.0.freq to assign or inspect. Can you explain what you mean by uefi/ACPI style boot process? Or is there a link that explains it. I only know of one boot process with freebsd on rpi boards, and thats via u-boot. On my rpi4 I have that sysctl, and can modify it: freebsd@rpi4 ~ % sysctl dev.cpu.0.freq dev.cpu.0.freq: 600 freebsd@rpi4 ~ % sudo sysctl dev.cpu.0.freq=3D2000 dev.cpu.0.freq: 600 -> 1500 reebsd@rpi4 ~ % sysctl -a | grep dev.cpu.0. dev.cpu.0.temperature: 49.0C dev.cpu.0.freq_levels: 1500/-1 600/-1 dev.cpu.0.freq: 1500 dev.cpu.0.%parent: cpulist0 dev.cpu.0.%pnpinfo: name=3Dcpu@0 compat=3Darm,cortex-a72 dev.cpu.0.%location:=20 dev.cpu.0.%driver: cpu dev.cpu.0.%desc: Open Firmware CPU >So far as I know, the dev.cpu.0.freq assignments lead to >fix frequency operation: as I have not done anything >explicit to cause dynamic changes. Again: heatsinks, fans, >and good power. yeah it seems once set, it stays there. But because freq_levels has only two values, I can only set one or the other of these values. 2000 is not available. If I don't set it in the sysctl, speed becomes dynamic according= to load. >I'll note that my experiments with timing rebuilds (from >scratch) ended up with times being shortest for -j3 for >the RPi4B. (Not surprising given the memory subsystem >properties from what I can tell.) Thanks, I'll try that next time I rebuild the kernel. >> The cpu is usually below 40 >> degC in a 20 degC environment. It'll go to 46 degC when make buildkernel= runs. >> >> I've tried much lower parameters with the same result. What am I doing w= rong? > >Overall, I do not know. But maybe some of the above will be >of use. It is useful, many thanks. How are you booting your rpi4s if not via u-boot? You're setting parameters= in config.txt for the rpi4 ? --=20 J. --61jdw2sOBCFtR2d/ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEE8n3tWhxW11Ccvv9/s8o7QhFzNAUFAl9WRtYACgkQs8o7QhFz NAUoMg//epaLY0tbxZsdzKmzAldaPbiX19gfD7JbhH83Ixyiug9xRjDIGTkpTTlz UbU1WUUJ9QQ+bHATC8jGwbxeDEs4qHL0BCqssVmiV6iBvisg62quixpkJ7+eS2FM KMLW3vbjjpf2JKGAypgbn4Y2H4m+Pta6RwVmUlXfXlwsdgrb/0qVqgkVOJmL8Znv 1IzT+21JBcArlUiqsDFe3ItyTHReo2yeKrhgAY4VCr+3oYAQ65YWcGcCzGVHlcnv jL9u5dwIfONXJ1Hd6w46avmyhwZlc7zEy9aiK6ozkAylukpLmsZwW020kuCrbooF BpM7UlpBObQrq4LU7lDIshvRD6pf6qMljkmlnm/cUZFJLZJIV9CgefyjYSrPHSi5 62XRJ1VYzLxKPRgu9EJAUCKFH2hiKDLqr2uORmRGuVPjbHy/ps8cAadvNqz+cKbE Qc0NAW6Z0jbFq3BxZ29GljnwpBgyxiwA/bkYsOWOn87TB8JZMlFV7NPOMjJn4YKB QfEzmD+VJtKG45Ei2PegCjcw7VgXACPo4s8tbUUW5e0cftUvuSqrDtGOdHdTemqj 1kTm4lcveOBHjbmaT46GoNvEjbQWvXeFLYAKu6eMq72AB6hjrN03JaRXi5+D6o5Z 3fw/V2Rva0CSpcYP1Xw9jNIy+hAztWLTBR6lGIT8ZOoDQTIkeLk= =Evae -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --61jdw2sOBCFtR2d/-- From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Mon Sep 7 15:21:18 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C87BC3CCFA4 for ; Mon, 7 Sep 2020 15:21:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd@www.zefox.net) Received: from www.zefox.net (www.zefox.net [50.1.20.27]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "www.zefox.com", Issuer "www.zefox.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BlX704qpDz4GM6 for ; Mon, 7 Sep 2020 15:21:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd@www.zefox.net) Received: from www.zefox.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by www.zefox.net (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 087FLKSR089719 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 7 Sep 2020 08:21:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fbsd@www.zefox.net) Received: (from fbsd@localhost) by www.zefox.net (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 087FLISX089718; Mon, 7 Sep 2020 08:21:18 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fbsd) Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2020 08:21:18 -0700 From: bob prohaska To: Ronald Klop Cc: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" , freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: MMCCAM - Re: onboard wireless on rpi4 Message-ID: <20200907152118.GA89696@www.zefox.net> References: <20200904134619.GB80905@bastion.zyxst.net> <69934262-D9D3-4986-849D-9E8221D1E387@kronometrix.org> <1677459627.55.1599232125847@localhost> <75E08DC2-D229-45AA-85AE-CCF06FD0B490@kronometrix.org> <09959D86-E3E3-43E9-8134-C2FC73343DBA@lists.zabbadoz.net> <507782579.41.1599484468967@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <507782579.41.1599484468967@localhost> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BlX704qpDz4GM6 X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of fbsd@www.zefox.net has no SPF policy when checking 50.1.20.27) smtp.mailfrom=fbsd@www.zefox.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.37 / 15.00]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; WWW_DOT_DOMAIN(0.50)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.90)[-0.903]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[zefox.net]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.25)[0.254]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.89)[-0.886]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7065, ipnet:50.1.16.0/20, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-arm]; MID_RHS_WWW(0.50)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2020 15:21:18 -0000 On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 03:14:28PM +0200, Ronald Klop wrote: > > I've MMCCAM running since 12.1-BETA1 on rpi3B+. No problems so far. > Apparently I'm to only one :-) https://dmesgd.nycbug.org/index.cgi?do=index&fts=mmccam > I just gave it a spin on a Pi3B (not +) and was rewarded with a panic. The machine boots from a USB mechanical disk. Sources are at 365355. Here's the console output: http://www.zefox.net/~fbsd/rpi3/GENERIC-MMCCAM/console I'll give the corresponding vanilla GENERIC kernel a try shortly, but 364900 boots without trouble. If there are other things to try I'm game, if testing on a Pi3 without wifi is pointless please warn me off. I figured it should, at the very least, not panic. HTH, bob prohaska From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Mon Sep 7 16:06:21 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66D533CE812 for ; Mon, 7 Sep 2020 16:06:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tech-lists@zyxst.net) Received: from wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BlY700P8Kz4LBj for ; Mon, 7 Sep 2020 16:06:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tech-lists@zyxst.net) Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E3159EB for ; Mon, 7 Sep 2020 12:06:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 07 Sep 2020 12:06:18 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zyxst.net; h= date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=fm3; bh=Yu77yIhGd5jhH5ESvvPn7mAmmE4 clKzgJNen2wmY1Rw=; b=mnlaVgnWeuSbDXkP4kPxQ5H90sBMji0FXp6Mbk8WXBt SQDgphcgXH3mhQELtmMOB91XghATq7njZn2tmxFdmMw0lCUxMisl3RyByP/2zr3T p4mH4SdEKwvTbiu+qBoD8rrRmAsGVWrSYoAG9rqxZ7TtJDEUwqoMVig0IQuuXNw+ Z214xblBpXL2YPUobAEcZCL1emflAqBg0xbkV6QL6Onv7vrjn9V5LeEuZnbQGLq5 mGSJ43Qb4mz69b6WdgFwL4MrOKhD2PBMDTH6T3Yb4Xe2stiTrNz55gazVT2ObFVG 3+reu+Tk114VWQvW8om888vc+R5VSTk5Q/7dio53t2Q== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=Yu77yI hGd5jhH5ESvvPn7mAmmE4clKzgJNen2wmY1Rw=; b=oyKOTyBH6TdLIfkCMbAGe1 EJmWY9TRt5OFVSoIZaNyTvI9yx43honkIw4HpoEm7RrA4cgYr8S5fuOdvHiAWmtf HaW6rn/BRft/9YvkFpylwyezRgekDc54b1r8DSXpJ3WNy73aTdceEkpHBBhwsKkO ZKmdp2O/AoO0btTJ99cPpJ6X7WZku4QmdoOn+GobZvKPiksZOrSd25jYuJeNveEc s/AzryL1xi5hm7ahwDI5pdh+iYAPilybpqqfb7pP4Tt4jW//pxVG3t+hY7Alu47r Nv90N2pirFisntWqFQcAs00QNI2+RiD2fRhFhclPjFcLDtMBqdxqaakKDx31pZfA == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduiedrudehtddgleekucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpeffhffvuffkfhggtggujgesghdtre ertddtvdenucfhrhhomhepthgvtghhqdhlihhsthhsuceothgvtghhqdhlihhsthhsseii hiigshhtrdhnvghtqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpefgffegueffudffgeejgfetffdvvd duieduffffffektdfhueeltddukeevieeigfenucffohhmrghinhepthifihhtthgvrhdr tghomhenucfkphepkedvrdejtddrledurdelleenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtne curfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehtvggthhdqlhhishhtshesiiihgihsthdrnhgv th X-ME-Proxy: Received: from bastion.zyxst.net (bastion.zyxst.net [82.70.91.99]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 1A52D3280059 for ; Mon, 7 Sep 2020 12:06:17 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2020 17:05:48 +0100 From: tech-lists To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: rpi4 won't overclock Message-ID: <20200907160548.GC62420@bastion.zyxst.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org References: <20200906145758.GA74236@bastion.zyxst.net> <20200907.085633.2141392583021666979.shigeru@os-hackers.jp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="S1BNGpv0yoYahz37" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200907.085633.2141392583021666979.shigeru@os-hackers.jp> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BlY700P8Kz4LBj X-Spamd-Bar: ----- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=zyxst.net header.s=fm3 header.b=mnlaVgnW; dkim=pass header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm3 header.b=oyKOTyBH; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of tech-lists@zyxst.net designates 64.147.123.25 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=tech-lists@zyxst.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-5.16 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[zyxst.net:s=fm3,messagingengine.com:s=fm3]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.98)[-0.984]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_GOOD(0.00)[64.147.123.25:from]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:64.147.123.25]; MIME_GOOD(-0.20)[multipart/signed,text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-arm@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.98)[-0.979]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[zyxst.net]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[zyxst.net:+,messagingengine.com:+]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.50)[-0.495]; SIGNED_PGP(-2.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:11403, ipnet:64.147.123.0/24, country:US]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-arm]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[64.147.123.25:from] X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2020 16:06:21 -0000 --S1BNGpv0yoYahz37 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 08:56:06AM +0900, YAMAMOTO Shigeru wrote: > >>>>>> "tech-lists" =3D=3D tech-lists writes: >tech-lists> Hi, I can't oc the pi in the usual way with -current on >tech-lists> rpi4. Obviously I'm doing something wrong, but I don't know >tech-lists> what. > >Please enable 'powerd'. >https://twitter.com/BsdHacker/status/1284090171684581378 > >``` >service powerd onestart thanks for this, it's working dynamically. Have you been able to get a higher clock speed? like 2000. Ideally, i'd like it to work dynamically to 2100 on FreeBSD thanks again, --=20 J. --S1BNGpv0yoYahz37 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIyBAABCAAdFiEE8n3tWhxW11Ccvv9/s8o7QhFzNAUFAl9WWm0ACgkQs8o7QhFz NAXePA/4zPB+BIUfvtVOiHs0slD8PGXIa3IKWGjKreG1ZHT3A1IIa9v/LppJ2/Om V894DyItNCqUIIwEzV/kUoGCs+3ChLleuaR8YuUKfJ385x+QiCpixm+3mK8PkKSh uXJOhMRyEmbFO4zHnoWvsKOuVcmUdw4gbZ0esUHBXaAKbranwm4gkTPrbFv77tnQ hQnLoclsCZL2P4qMv3hC+Bf/BbhHydqVsUxGdEYy4gyjja9NJ6Hn/SodjnYBf54M 4sikDyOgHF0jCiHb1jXx+uEGpk03XritC4Vw5HRFfmA6Ow36ZhzDbp7/+jbJLNT2 GQPPOqLUgGuxfyU8mV8YSNwRT3ooiZqqOFEOYcwYX6VW7932GTq1Wlo8g92qd6sV Uu44jBS9LKbDhMt4R5NEZVrYL0sKSCx5kJxO5K0H0KW1XMrsHfLFr719gJqZJ9yr irTlLiOtAU8IoDOiJESuu2vOhWoLKLIe51vNOph1j4Ys5cr3VVDBhHHqQaa0+gtG HYDU1mY0kV7j5LcFlbvLXO+2m7KXUNiJAe+oERRzKtY8/zEH7PfS2kQM9ntq9Y8k cKbHemv4MBiaX4cDAnzB2sR0BPAQlm/ajcRei/2SLpRWlpVUFsNPhI/+mFXrsrjq MDq6ZLxE53QcikCk0vSgrNJQ6R4aJYfA2vKmxnu5cnF1zYBCSQ== =Ofdd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --S1BNGpv0yoYahz37-- From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Mon Sep 7 16:18:40 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE7113CEA53 for ; Mon, 7 Sep 2020 16:18:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net) Received: from mx1.sbone.de (mx1.sbone.de [IPv6:2a01:4f8:13b:39f::9f:25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx1.sbone.de", Issuer "SBone.DE" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BlYPC5S0Qz4LxX for ; Mon, 7 Sep 2020 16:18:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net) Received: from mail.sbone.de (mail.sbone.de [IPv6:fde9:577b:c1a9:31::2013:587]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.sbone.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 124D68D4A21E; Mon, 7 Sep 2020 16:18:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from content-filter.sbone.de (content-filter.sbone.de [IPv6:fde9:577b:c1a9:31::2013:2742]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.sbone.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F29CE707B8; Mon, 7 Sep 2020 16:18:31 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at sbone.de Received: from mail.sbone.de ([IPv6:fde9:577b:c1a9:31::2013:587]) by content-filter.sbone.de (content-filter.sbone.de [fde9:577b:c1a9:31::2013:2742]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id reaAaBqDC2aH; Mon, 7 Sep 2020 16:18:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (unknown [IPv6:fde9:577b:c1a9:4902:1414:6670:b334:563a]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.sbone.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9393FE707B0; Mon, 7 Sep 2020 16:18:29 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" To: "bob prohaska" Cc: "Ronald Klop" , freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: MMCCAM - Re: onboard wireless on rpi4 Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2020 16:18:28 +0000 X-Mailer: MailMate (2.0BETAr6151) Message-ID: <40D76B81-934B-43A4-B269-E075D2F4B4CD@lists.zabbadoz.net> In-Reply-To: <20200907152118.GA89696@www.zefox.net> References: <20200904134619.GB80905@bastion.zyxst.net> <69934262-D9D3-4986-849D-9E8221D1E387@kronometrix.org> <1677459627.55.1599232125847@localhost> <75E08DC2-D229-45AA-85AE-CCF06FD0B490@kronometrix.org> <09959D86-E3E3-43E9-8134-C2FC73343DBA@lists.zabbadoz.net> <507782579.41.1599484468967@localhost> <20200907152118.GA89696@www.zefox.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BlYPC5S0Qz4LxX X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net designates 2a01:4f8:13b:39f::9f:25 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.53 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a01:4f8:13b:39f::9f:25]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[zabbadoz.net]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.97)[-0.973]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.26)[-0.262]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.998]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:2a01:4f8::/29, country:DE]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-arm] X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2020 16:18:40 -0000 On 7 Sep 2020, at 15:21, bob prohaska wrote: > On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 03:14:28PM +0200, Ronald Klop wrote: >> >> I've MMCCAM running since 12.1-BETA1 on rpi3B+. No problems so far. >> Apparently I'm to only one :-) >> https://dmesgd.nycbug.org/index.cgi?do=index&fts=mmccam >> > > I just gave it a spin on a Pi3B (not +) and was rewarded with a > panic. The machine boots from a USB mechanical disk. Sources are > at 365355. Here's the console output: > > http://www.zefox.net/~fbsd/rpi3/GENERIC-MMCCAM/console > > I'll give the corresponding vanilla GENERIC kernel a try shortly, but > 364900 > boots without trouble. This seems to be a FDT/loader thing; others will know more about what it means. > If there are other things to try I'm game, if testing > on a Pi3 without wifi is pointless please warn me off. I figured it > should, > at the very least, not panic. No it’s not pointless. The more use cases we can make sure work, the better. Testing SD cards would also be great to know they work well. On a nanopi I am currently chasing (and running a disect): - sdda sometimes created long after init started when running root from an mdimage - very poor write performance on the SD (which wasn’t the case) - a more-or-less random hang in g_waitidle when user space starts up /bz From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Mon Sep 7 16:32:48 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABB673CF32C for ; Mon, 7 Sep 2020 16:32:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tech-lists@zyxst.net) Received: from wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BlYjX0HHdz4Mpm for ; Mon, 7 Sep 2020 16:32:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tech-lists@zyxst.net) Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2F22A9F for ; Mon, 7 Sep 2020 12:32:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 07 Sep 2020 12:32:46 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zyxst.net; h= date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=fm3; bh=83KQfCw/Rj5mRTTxvS95OAQvDql n9MblL2fh9ksJom8=; b=jsl9xH6e69+B45u7ffPQEq5jZpIwyL3eP3gFGRIGJJN 0S/i1kGgJb+1oydQqmfkx7NkLwV5YRKuNNYYAbMlDFb1wEMGoUlS0n17GKPYJziC /lcUt1Nncoz3KJ5Xa07DWhj56jJbgDa+A1L9XMfcG9uVq3L0ooMGDaoJIhJTjv2L chRUApT3OXn2XYfnVP1NnuAGrYgwGOlM6O6Q5mElWV9dWajzBQ5/XlS7LhhQEn4s yMl/axebbaUNs28ndqfgr3sqfeoqUQWho5oXaKSGYYlKK91eXtYuHZfZ293zGhq0 irDrOpTZLHohQTA83/0S+nmBOZmDzxxFws0xfbkSYBg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=83KQfC w/Rj5mRTTxvS95OAQvDqln9MblL2fh9ksJom8=; b=uPX6S5PVIKIyyFzv2hwRzQ Xo4fvGLBFKY1X7Ss0KV1Kd9irlaeo2pkd5I6yKcFSS8vUCH85Cnf4RT5uc0qEa5S 5nuWXj1NqtG85laaZcHmygzXYvvE1vZ3EY6hTQUbihVXsfqVDQOIKhWxfqsY4jP0 2hHlgVheeKWeMgFrk1GL10AL8B2JOFSwBhjgKwU07Wrij/5gTYLnvjCuTlWc1eGD yW53XJk41KsgPV7b2SlCKrYes+FNtSA8CGyCLk8ii+usbGewRz3pPnXtxFF6u9Hp euRHDuf2LkLabHq9YtC+cGNVu15Ol4t/nM5mmzzoir/D6jkFflWB3qntVg/YT4Ng == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduiedrudehtddguddtfecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepfffhvffukfhfgggtuggjsehgtd erredttddvnecuhfhrohhmpehtvggthhdqlhhishhtshcuoehtvggthhdqlhhishhtshes iiihgihsthdrnhgvtheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepieegheelvdfffefhgedtfeeitd egkeevgeffieevffdttdefjeehfeejteeigedunecuffhomhgrihhnpehfrhgvvggsshgu rdhorhhgpdiihiigshhtrdhnvghtnecukfhppeekvddrjedtrdeluddrleelnecuvehluh hsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthgvtghhqdhlihhs thhsseiihiigshhtrdhnvght X-ME-Proxy: Received: from bastion.zyxst.net (bastion.zyxst.net [82.70.91.99]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id CABA73280063 for ; Mon, 7 Sep 2020 12:32:45 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2020 17:32:17 +0100 From: tech-lists To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: onboard wireless on rpi4 Message-ID: <20200907163217.GD62420@bastion.zyxst.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org References: <5AF83D16-2432-4EA9-BC2F-373DA8BC3360@googlemail.com> <4306A90D-97B9-4DE9-A05A-A91B6F4A587F@yahoo.com> <8037E5D3-E89E-4AED-8FFE-43D9D83B2BD3@yahoo.com> <24CED3CF-6624-4CE3-A21C-D4BAD88E8812@googlemail.com> <5u2b7xt1_fm5BlXrwr9UEqnraMQDmFnYxCNVzbjJ8tM3MSYZ0Gh5k7TpiVOH4cZbEa6Sd4qQqicQDt4r_U5iXPRjodjwghbiKL55BHigEtM=@protonmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="RYJh/3oyKhIjGcML" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5u2b7xt1_fm5BlXrwr9UEqnraMQDmFnYxCNVzbjJ8tM3MSYZ0Gh5k7TpiVOH4cZbEa6Sd4qQqicQDt4r_U5iXPRjodjwghbiKL55BHigEtM=@protonmail.com> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BlYjX0HHdz4Mpm X-Spamd-Bar: ----- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=zyxst.net header.s=fm3 header.b=jsl9xH6e; dkim=pass header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm3 header.b=uPX6S5PV; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of tech-lists@zyxst.net designates 64.147.123.25 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=tech-lists@zyxst.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-5.15 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[zyxst.net:s=fm3,messagingengine.com:s=fm3]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.98)[-0.984]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_GOOD(0.00)[64.147.123.25:from]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:64.147.123.25:c]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.20)[multipart/signed,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-arm@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.98)[-0.979]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[zyxst.net]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[zyxst.net:+,messagingengine.com:+]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.49)[-0.489]; SIGNED_PGP(-2.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:11403, ipnet:64.147.123.0/24, country:US]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-arm]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[64.147.123.25:from] X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2020 16:32:48 -0000 --RYJh/3oyKhIjGcML Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Sep 06, 2020 at 06:15:35PM +0000, Robert Crowston via freebsd-arm w= rote: >Using only the lowest 1 GiB for DMA seems completely reliable. Perhaps I c= ould have a volunteer to test https://reviews.freebsd.org/D26344 ? Hi, Before your patch, I tried to create a 3GB file via /dev/random on a usb3-connected-and-powered spinning rust drive and got errors so bad the dr= ive disconnected itself, see https://cloud.zyxst.net/~john/FreeBSD/raspberry_pi_4/rpi4-before-D26344.txt After rebuilding the kernel with your patch, these errors have gone. I've tried up to 16GB so far, no errors. Transferring a file of that size busies= up the filesystem on the sdcard though and logins will time out if they are attempted while a large file transfer to the sdcard is happening. But the errors have gone, and the drive doesn't re-set itself. thanks, --=20 J. --RYJh/3oyKhIjGcML Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEE8n3tWhxW11Ccvv9/s8o7QhFzNAUFAl9WYKIACgkQs8o7QhFz NAWr3hAAhC4zQmd1c0UNkG36H2Hg0IK4j/21U/dlNGSvtPDQ29yzsl347JjEbMyD o31Pc38fGRiAaWWvohNjw354w2+lpQ9M6kNpjWYQMr48tJSxRJO33+rII4WXBRam hAElPzFgbsbLBdwigpdKjb+/eR8wXW0l9p0JD69cHa8+jY2JOa/sFxZpu9Si6C5k yuZ+lx2ktJgrmYooAilYDIKhLGZ0y3C0HImByVkPzvr8isf0ZkL5slFbIlwcPwCS d1Go8byQJUj55FLmdedg95T/L/ZaR0ix/L8Nbq5TQHgyMQa2nUveLQXMboqxMcrh HW7hf6iUdxm2MlUAnGw63C+L13lO7AkVpEemZVvLX0YtzYPIPUvD8mCUtqKm7gBO /jiMqWmX/D23MChrS93fv2o+2nqza7fTwx0V+/wwr4p/+GhDs25zc4y0BfnTw2cl k8mPSQiloJmLWmtn2nN6xctr9dJb9fh2K9qpXjQk0Oir8/ZbvY7vOJJoXsMWTFc0 Y2AepmFHeHKOSyFrQbvdDTrQ+B13Ovq5oFMxx+6ELedZZO+1uZBKk7Gsxcxm+GLj SwOo7zRiHtyBAPj3APRVlvPyShgxhPoRWoB2kk3hpwJQAPrSydm9RkRyGWiQnjBk V3Y+nj+uoPVgKyo0WBsi9pczZS26W5P04mtbp1OgPxTWdLmjfbQ= =OB7p -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --RYJh/3oyKhIjGcML-- From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Mon Sep 7 18:29:02 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2A483D3905 for ; Mon, 7 Sep 2020 18:29:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marklmi@yahoo.com) Received: from sonic314-20.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (sonic314-20.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com [98.137.69.83]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BlcHd3fjnz4Xsk for ; Mon, 7 Sep 2020 18:28:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marklmi@yahoo.com) X-YMail-OSG: e2a38TMVM1ks.mny4SJvVN6tePkw.eQec.UUK8Q.yG2NSyMfuFAd8u0zrHhvyy5 z8jdSGcevghsCq7aNsskmA06n42O2qSf3i2jwkl2inle9fbKX1xDxSNFJ.EHdvVmIuiD5tQBnqHQ S16Agv_drclDvQilzFQ2OSRmgrIgJi88TWsmOlnc0WoFkSLP6YF4Oemy7cfAt1.Wjc4WRXLpG.eG nxpfRGU5ZUtLBDssNZ89ZQd4ANvotWnVUYmq9SIzpfNI4kJ9Q1Y9QXCHk0eBdoFXTvMyFkNrQkyn mBmSk4CgLyJTkMio1daSbpT5xdnSAP6ODNjYOs.EJn4g4Jp8S2IeV.2x9oq1S3brpzKp5KTyr.fX K0S2Ih75IcmDrHy.EnPQY9K4O3XSYT3Mc8fekemjUPO2oF.RPiBSO_hYM5N6FIfRy1lUvuT6o_Sg JLCrPDtvJjtj1hL2b7V61ZbySxS6G4QZpkQ0cQSdXC.e2baT.qZhksLwwRljb5NfeCY_RdpBBzOQ SZxDa1T4wFxztpcrzQD3..Vp0DXhE_h3ZEK93VW5c0R2AUIjtr6u62u3avHz9qjw9_xLijUDcRIu q2xnpt8dmtgMQC2cZRZsxRH8FDMxv4aUB569tk8IeC8QzdhNot25GWGUgKA0x7sq5F5WXqybRSfl qiTj9YYWGW4MTnUEigK0JWBG3Ir8UbTjKSZun4cO0Eiqd.xeoLbUYXVYifULwLzL4wnDDru5ZmgN 1Yc7C0AvCsnhcEY864iDEtsf_N4QjexqwBI51AUe.CqVmVw1tyqC_H0kZpYr5iN22wAp6bnkZ871 5dXLR6O0jdCy4vmNd9ECykqgJELKvB.QTFp3Lf8nYZ6_y_1.Wiry7omKzkbyRzqrlN29oTe6BnMM hDUtJDdRACVTH4DM9kYynjcdCeLI7d9EHXgeqG4PTqHbts_EZfytDK8Z9Qz8ehfDA3kI4P5RxqHu omnoiBUMZmaEvmlkdP26s6i3y4eUKp.bz_tTS.J2Qq719RkXJWyVgMnFgRyCL3J1isltIMEiLOfM PiF9k.5bBntZqWx1p6ccidKzqtLQpWALPBNdizEW8DNgnA7MA71fSgHTWUHRsPyjhXF3rUyj8enJ f0Pxr6vIJbMbkReivYZQVWxjdWUC6wy.pGBn1FaTlydyMfbjRgy2j1JyKy5bNZ42n.y1FaY67m5L KXm.g0ZYPV8WUbzKgUF23En6k9gydhaxRL_DSI.v_FjbCj2Iec8Qi5o5SORm3sK.V6UgMeiTyU8b dHIGIQ3EslF.ow87riC.9xBhLEdTsvzxP_x0acbpUahefiyB0wQmsOoFita1VBlDKHiqjbP9YNJm dMwK0i7n9.Ob_1rMKdIDx0roOzd5nAftTkyQlZOormei4xEV13bG9zyaBr8ezg7vaTWjVsH_dUcs NxZo96R0lmiMrWoecOxDOUuwsXDfz.x60inSKPGHE7hEdQC9yOowzyzZ5RUvqHh8mkQ5HMV8jUYk OtaY61RrAdhHiEPQ3_7daxJqNVFFvIQAzbnx73c9N6ne2Ioes.r3Ln1vDoYDBC1EpgkCE.yBfOEB Z Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic314.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with HTTP; Mon, 7 Sep 2020 18:28:58 +0000 Received: by smtp407.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (VZM Hermes SMTP Server) with ESMTPA ID 87c732d65feeb39563dc0c4951ff2b79; Mon, 07 Sep 2020 18:28:55 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.1\)) Subject: Re: rpi4 won't overclock From: Mark Millard In-Reply-To: <20200907144212.GB62420@bastion.zyxst.net> Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2020 11:28:54 -0700 Cc: freebsd-arm Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <9AF2EC1F-4EAC-4029-A988-EDF242C35BE9@yahoo.com> References: <2F772350-6832-44CE-BCB4-F877173D320A.ref@yahoo.com> <2F772350-6832-44CE-BCB4-F877173D320A@yahoo.com> <20200907144212.GB62420@bastion.zyxst.net> To: tech-lists X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.1) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BlcHd3fjnz4Xsk X-Spamd-Bar: --- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.73 / 15.00]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[yahoo.com]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ptr:yahoo.com]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[yahoo.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[yahoo.com,reject]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.22)[-1.218]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[yahoo.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:36647, ipnet:98.137.64.0/20, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[yahoo.com:dkim]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.01)[-1.009]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[yahoo.com:s=s2048]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.003]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[98.137.69.83:from]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[98.137.69.83:from]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-arm] X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2020 18:29:03 -0000 On 2020-Sep-7, at 07:42, tech-lists wrote: . . . > Can you explain what you mean by uefi/ACPI style boot process? Or is = there a > link that explains it. I only know of one boot process with freebsd on = rpi > boards, and thats via u-boot. For now I'm restricting myself to replying to just the above. https://rpi4-uefi.dev/ is about "SBBR-compliant (UEFI+ACPI) AArch64 =3D firmware for the Raspberry Pi 4". Think UEFI/ACPI like on PC based servers and modern PCs. You can read some about it there. There are more recent releases than that page talks about. The list of releases is shown at: https://github.com/pftf/RPi4/releases/ There are installation notes on the page shown by: https://github.com/pftf/RPi4/ Last I checked, the uefi serial console setting needs to be selected for FreeBSD to boot but recent uefi releases have the Graphical selection as the default. Last I checked, the uefi software can not save its settings to USB boot media on a 8 GiB RPi4B (silent no-op) but can on a 4 GiB RPi4B. An 8 GiB can use the USB media that was saved-to on a 4 GiB. So far as I know, using microsd card to hold the uefi software should work fine for both types of RPi4B, including for saving settings. Note: It takes fairly recent eeprom contents for a RPi4B to boot from USB(3) without use of a microsd card. (Not just uefi booting: generally.) The RPi4B handling of GPT, MBR, and hybrid for some type(s) of media are still undergoing changes: Recent BETA RPi4B firmware changed the microsd card handling of Hybrid. (I do not know if u-boot supports avoiding microsd cards when the RPi4B has sufficient eeprom content and recent enough firmware.) =3D=3D=3D Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away in early 2018-Mar) From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Mon Sep 7 18:47:21 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC81A3D3FA7 for ; Mon, 7 Sep 2020 18:47:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marklmi@yahoo.com) Received: from sonic302-22.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (sonic302-22.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com [98.137.68.148]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Blchm3cX3z4ZdS for ; Mon, 7 Sep 2020 18:47:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marklmi@yahoo.com) X-YMail-OSG: z29R_boVM1kJ0KF6NWXbjTX8bfK3Y6nAboMf29Qd66c2ap6mv3Dyp2rZxl3Sabv zQcro1i.54T0GoJCYJPvOmPOvopiPVVX_zMZIdmB6Re9TX2N5rJgN9AQWbsDHlqjULo5ki9QsYrU wUWk_44Ucogzi3OnXiSquYZdm5t_SyllTbJhDoX394fjFlaVQq.E6RvIQd3x5_gOcHU4r_ou3hCa 5gsqn5fI8UQj1wSqv_VhTlPiQTCsTTnb.1HuXMjYOv317uFMdLf.RKS33ypLH1tKHEDRM0eVK8wc aQg.F6b8sZhNrJScUk.FG67lp0Pmi9CjpM8oDd2C6.oZir0KMyrZ4QptQ111JMDyCTA5FaiGVzsW o_bGifVQ3NTKPiQcn9ezlGET9xDt3TReiqYhGgMxr4fY40ZygjKldCs.EAm1naCsSidLDK3X.k7O 8SQVx1GjGU0Se.R5gAuVq11V4Go.Ez2GVARhfT2B6vVi5kOrrTT5wkU_cdivvy74guWHYMM0J9MF NV5qN._zR0OuLi6EE9st5puVV8vWxuvBDCaGt6D9YL2N496QlFgSozkfJ9jRHfBeeNDvpm.9x9Fo buxgknlL1EjFQIVb9nbzWkjWUxYuba8etYZfk91GJwtZCZeOenQ0ZxdTJMvlYPrqrAcsA.DYfF77 .3Ofd3q4hFYAyImFkxg3iPlPr..pWdYKyeQTVyJ9XiIbD8RoFnQ2i_scLN7wqwpFijQq3TEmmfCi 6pDQiF.tiUV82WMtqseHu1lPzekzRqsuqeuKgoilSvq3WeApLmYR75lGXX81B0ewav4XSKQBF9AT UcmFOznRJyDvtx37OpVzwYslIW2cTVMiTuLbP0nKnpMVzHY0Ok7ikqN3SliG6mAM_HJIlE_09HDz cu0gvfLyudFRw3Uxw9PNKBdKul1sZmbfDOMOlzaWpdy6XKld2i6k2ZA6Lt4YXckLU_iqDcOCvF46 vlmdBa9CufZqWAdxa0bOBrHDbTKrPPVDcZtIN_G6WRdFCa87yPqfsYjN8dMl.ymIrhe5fU35x8WT 6s3L6ZoFTTvlS8AzsyQElATHgnPLHtGcvr.tT7O8Zs8qmGLcpRrd14_AtgfQCRaih7sOUGwPSnpr ZWnP2WeQltIP72.p3WEwXL5qWHwYfY1OAX.TOC.Mb.7Sf1607nqzwrLMj8aiklUSjfwbfuasnKkw 2RNWnVtunG5M0o5_cpRuWCa5NBCQ_crsCl3KeruYC.qg3EVMt_RaKJ7BerecOjFpXRPfDqQdFXi9 R3_JJCiMzX3wkovgS79DMMo3kv4jXYmgl4dNvnzoR24_wH7BO5BOXcaKkpsys7e1NXVuAB9QaGBU I97vvbYa.22QN71H3BQ.IAje0gvgA8loFffYnagOhmT95sVmdb.lReb38XL2WQTtbz.8keZz5SEb 5zj36vOMsG48rMi6sVWSfSzOm9I4dUxp2TMG.lt6BVEE8n7Rm.65_84LaEHM1Ii14s62hIU9HqPz x1dKa1Lwq4.8bcTn38TeEsBEcuRCcBzJbzoDyz8YxKYrig7bmoruZM6AXF5PoqItpblggM9bF0E0 - Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic302.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with HTTP; Mon, 7 Sep 2020 18:47:18 +0000 Received: by smtp418.mail.ne1.yahoo.com (VZM Hermes SMTP Server) with ESMTPA ID 3d35703de7ea8213993f068639dcca07; Mon, 07 Sep 2020 18:47:13 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.1\)) Subject: Re: onboard wireless on rpi4 From: Mark Millard In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2020 11:47:12 -0700 Cc: Robert Crowston , freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <99701B38-13FE-40D6-9D94-182E1995644A@yahoo.com> References: <9B62C18C-EE94-4DFE-8EA9-AC7B32966886@yahoo.com> <20200904134619.GB80905@bastion.zyxst.net> <5AF83D16-2432-4EA9-BC2F-373DA8BC3360@googlemail.com> <4306A90D-97B9-4DE9-A05A-A91B6F4A587F@yahoo.com> <8037E5D3-E89E-4AED-8FFE-43D9D83B2BD3@yahoo.com> <24CED3CF-6624-4CE3-A21C-D4BAD88E8812@googlemail.com> To: myfreeweb X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.1) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Blchm3cX3z4ZdS X-Spamd-Bar: --- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.91 / 15.00]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[yahoo.com]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ptr:yahoo.com]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[yahoo.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[yahoo.com,reject]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.39)[-1.386]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[yahoo.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:36647, ipnet:98.137.64.0/20, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[yahoo.com:dkim]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.01)[-1.012]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[yahoo.com:s=s2048]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.01)[-1.010]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[98.137.68.148:from]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[98.137.68.148:from]; FREEMAIL_CC(0.00)[protonmail.com,freebsd.org]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-arm] X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2020 18:47:22 -0000 On 2020-Sep-6, at 11:36, greg at unrelenting.technology wrote: September 6, 2020 9:20 PM, "Mark Millard via freebsd-arm" wrote: >=20 >> On 2020-Sep-6, at 08:20, Robert Crowston via freebsd-arm wrote: >>=20 >>> That's interesting: OpenBSD is allowing only the lowest 1 GB of = memory for DMA; the documentation I >>> obtained suggests the first 3 GB should be accessible. I am = experimenting with this new lower >>> bound. >>=20 >> https://rpi4-uefi.dev/tag/netbsd reports: >>=20 >> QUOTE >> NetBSD also is the only OS today to fully support ACPI _DMA = descriptors for describing DMA >> translations/constraints. This is very important for supporting Pi = and Pi-like platforms via >> straight-up ACPI and without platform DMA quirks. >> END QUOTE >=20 > That would be https://reviews.freebsd.org/D25219 for us.. not "full = support" though because our bus dma tags are way too weak and = inflexible, much worse than NetBSD's :( >=20 > The RPi ACPI tables declare a 3GB limit for XHCI, and a 1GB limit for = some other devices. >=20 > Namely, devices described by > = https://github.com/tianocore/edk2-platforms/blob/master/Platform/Raspberry= Pi/AcpiTables/GpuDevs.asl It is not clear to me if the Greg vs. Robert developments in this area are: A) conflicting? (Use at most one of the two.) B) compatible but independent? C) compatible with one based on also using the other? It sounds like Robert may be going the direction of using the minimum of what is learned from what the ACPI tables report as supportable in the hardware --and so may be using a global 1 GiB limit for each PCIe device, including the XHCI device. =3D=3D=3D Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away in early 2018-Mar) From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Mon Sep 7 20:13:15 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CAF73D5A0A for ; Mon, 7 Sep 2020 20:13:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marklmi@yahoo.com) Received: from sonic316-55.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (sonic316-55.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com [98.137.69.31]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Blfbt1hKCz4gJF for ; Mon, 7 Sep 2020 20:13:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marklmi@yahoo.com) X-YMail-OSG: vdh6hZ4VM1n4_FUyUmtKQ6JYpNSDieSeYrqFI03kIrdPUXnpjHt8VPa8qIKTfv8 A1J7ge.9.9mtn1SAsg7HSgGb6Jo4yGwslOVU_VHFKtmM8KWotXScLR9rzhCkI7Rd2lOcthPluEgF YOauzv.MZv5jqYd7YhvTmS5p3wM_RIgRrgVXw7Ovjv4G2pAbHMz7.ZL1WbTLneZz3JhUKhfs7yys zhCoM5Yt5QzE62WyhNrMBDV7lHAXsU3XVgK2.kAimNZEK2hnAvFYxsHnEGXc4zVfQF1NitbClaLR qpbva_Hd9P4CnCFfWayw__2QJmGZadkCSmWvgRKoIQnqQ3AFITJkZKO9pwsYj2uWWSw5wANKEzPQ kauGyBalDMfIYh7DzkkO9Jket23dx4ldWWbjmGuc34e_61_lZ17VLn1Ew9sI4Dp88cDXQ3oqkYL5 seidgh3mgeF0XcxGOqe1ZMreBpCuCfYJhUNWJji1ADgDwleE5ete5ve3AbU8SKbGyacd08qz32j7 lnJ_sYCCVgmaVmIaT_CWUVv3ZifWid8QSIxxPHFpdHT9hf9igILUQVakRBK0K839Kr7nJAtk.dU. YXwIEtScsPd2fDtXGa6BKkeDsPsSACJVB8rYdrogr06L09bWO.6preBnmbBKj6K82uOpWbZKI2ya YecRng0fj5qepORN90xRb520JSjRX7GpoGjgUB0lKEQRgYrC.JwFTrF9jhY01VxCPK.mEUv0Q4Xg XcpM0hnl.JLFOGAeG1CRSEX8GJq01fK52UshT2Ew_4Y1NHZwhZPW_IuKvzfIpOyhOAD_u7zweJsY 0AQybfJTKYxcXEMKqT7B..cP3u0B4YzhfN.2swNK.XOx2W3glHA3n6E2XV9vrVvr758d2js34JbV kG_W.Ca8sgZJ7oc7VRsUD8oYU1GlPInR1oZtI4txJmSNnvJO93X5YwCOoSXIcxv5y5wc8bWlvWLJ ALd9EleN72vurF5_Eww1KDJQOGHUBrrJ0bkAGGW9cQ3f_V7EvfCO8WH8noMf2hzFo80fILufDezo 3rMKIuA2jhRp0Dqofaulz9YW__WNVdQmYeznT.YxTV3TB9WLm_1TFA9MDuefRWEkzICHcSi2Z1B2 OhFmkk5Ijqyw1OFqOkhKviCPSreJUukRB3rRHt5RRMjU5CUjs6ycFP.cZSCmps5DePngiVMMyL29 PC4fAdFFUz15GYd56yqhVwuscZxorNQGz0tFbr0stvenfwDhAw6SeRKoYTXZadMUdIeWuqOYZsWT nW0tyZkmo5X5uXBe34XmopwHEGqR4ofTXREZ1IreKnpBSR0fOmWIOaEwFuKxqhv1rKVDHW1WAoVM 78fKhI4MkR.hXqzR1KgysW05DrkWlPmV5ScUs0c02xKwC1mvFvzpZgW2aATl.8a6KXI39liYLCkG 73gWBGiZp4R9olP1G3OABN26.X9yNWYsrdL96TmumkA9wTawH3CZ.4Bqeywq_RZN82rKY8dNweh1 eFn3YwPkZt.FbGKE0netdWsiX1nYLzd3_DWevf676dAy4FrMsZazkQpMEzD0MyXrYbvCzDb1m3g- - Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic316.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with HTTP; Mon, 7 Sep 2020 20:13:11 +0000 Received: by smtp415.mail.ne1.yahoo.com (VZM Hermes SMTP Server) with ESMTPA ID e2412b0423bca969a5b50482e533e303; Mon, 07 Sep 2020 20:13:10 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.1\)) Subject: Re: rpi4 won't overclock From: Mark Millard In-Reply-To: <20200907144212.GB62420@bastion.zyxst.net> Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2020 13:13:08 -0700 Cc: freebsd-arm Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <20E5C2A1-86CE-4C6A-8630-96537E13B460@yahoo.com> References: <2F772350-6832-44CE-BCB4-F877173D320A.ref@yahoo.com> <2F772350-6832-44CE-BCB4-F877173D320A@yahoo.com> <20200907144212.GB62420@bastion.zyxst.net> To: tech-lists X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.1) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Blfbt1hKCz4gJF X-Spamd-Bar: --- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.63 / 15.00]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[yahoo.com]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ptr:yahoo.com]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[yahoo.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[yahoo.com,reject]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.12)[-1.115]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[yahoo.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:36647, ipnet:98.137.64.0/20, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[yahoo.com:dkim]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.01)[-1.010]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[yahoo.com:s=s2048]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.002]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[98.137.69.31:from]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[98.137.69.31:from]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-arm] X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2020 20:13:15 -0000 On 2020-Sep-7, at 07:42, tech-lists wrote: Hi, On Sun, Sep 06, 2020 at 05:31:15PM -0700, Mark Millard wrote: >>> . . . >>=20 >> Have you tried making config.txt a strict copy of config_rip4.txt >> with no other changes and it still fails to boot? >=20 > Yes, just tried that. It will boot but it fails to boot if I set = overclocking parameters in > config.txt. Then my next question would be: does a modern RasbPiOS boot from microsd card media with those same overclocking parameters in the config.txt? If not, there is little hope for FreeBSD booting and operating well with such parameter values (given the same equipement, power, etc.). If RasbPiOS does boot, then it may be that some setting(s) are outside the range that u-boot handles and need to be set later. May be over_voltage can stay in config.txt but the equivalent of arm_freq needs to be done from FreeBSD, say via powerd or /etc/sysctl.conf assigning dev.cpu.0.freq to some value. > I get to a screen that complains about newer firmware. It doesn't > get as far as u-boot. I took the card out and amended it on another = machine, > then put it back in the rpi4. It boots, and config.txt looks like = this: >=20 > arm_control=3D0x200 > arm_64bit=3D1 > dtoverlay=3Ddisable-bt > dtoverlay=3Dmmc > device_tree_address=3D0x4000 > kernel=3Du-boot.bin > armstub=3Darmstub8-gic.bin > #gpu_mem=3D16 > #over_voltage=3D6 > #arm_freq=3D2100 >=20 >> . . . >=20 > On my rpi3 12.1-STABLE r363237 GENERIC I have the following in > /boot/msdos/config.txt: >=20 > arm_control=3D0x200 > dtparam=3Daudio=3Don,i2c_arm=3Don,spi=3Don > dtoverlay=3Dmmc > dtoverlay=3Dpwm > dtoverlay=3Ddisable-bt > device_tree_address=3D0x4000 > kernel=3Du-boot.bin > #force_turbo=3D1 > gpu_mem=3D16 > arm_freq=3D1500 > over_voltage=3D4 >=20 > which normally gives 1.5GHz under load, nothing in /etc/sysctl.conf is = setting > this parameter. I have just enabled powerd powerd is what is changing the frequency in that context. (I've not been using powerd. For one, I do not expect that the uefi boot is providing what powerd needs to operate.) I expect that that at the command prompt after boot -s you would find that the frequency has not changed yet, indicating that the arm_freq has been ignored. (powerpd is started later in the sequence and can adjust the frequency.) > and rebooted, but it hasn't come > back so I suspect in my case it's applying config.txt but there's a = powerd <-> > config.txt interaction happening preventing it from booting. powerd is not started until very late as I remember. It seems your failure is before powerd is involved, if I understand right. >> . . . >>=20 >> I did do some margin testing initially and figures around 2100 were >> not reliable for keeping the RPi4B's operating. Of course, various >> things can contribute to what setting work with some margin for >> environment variability. I've got heatsinks, fans, and (apparently) >> good power. >=20 > I'm using dedicated power supplies made for rpi3 and rpi4. Am using = heatsinks > on the rpi3 in a clear plastic case on the rpi3 and a FLIRC aluminium = heatsink > case on the rpi4. RPi4B: I use CanaKit USB-C Power Supplies: 5.1V 3.5A, so slightly over = 17.8W. This is somewhat more than the official power supplies provide as far as the 3.5A figure (and Watts) goes. >> . . . > On my rpi4 I have that sysctl, and can modify > it: >=20 > freebsd@rpi4 ~ % sysctl dev.cpu.0.freq > dev.cpu.0.freq: 600 > freebsd@rpi4 ~ % sudo sysctl dev.cpu.0.freq=3D2000 > dev.cpu.0.freq: 600 -> 1500 I expect that either u-boot or the .dtb material (and handling of the dtb material) is constraining the arm_frequency to 1500. It may also be that the over_voltage does not survive (is replaced) and that the frequency has to be kept consistent with whatever over_voltage ends up at. (The uefi style booting by default uses what config.txt specifies for these, although uefi settings can be saved. But there are tradeoffs in what devices are usable. I use a USB3 Ethernet device, for example.) > reebsd@rpi4 ~ % sysctl -a | grep dev.cpu.0. > dev.cpu.0.temperature: 49.0C > dev.cpu.0.freq_levels: 1500/-1 600/-1 > . . . . 2000 is not > available. My guess is either u-boot or FreeBSD's interpretation of the .dtb material leads to the other speeds not being available. I'll note that, for example, ubuntu uses the arm_freq to set which frequencies are compatible with configuring to allow the target frequency. For example, with arm_freq=3D2000 the allowed frequency list is shown as: # cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_available_frequencies 666666 800000 1000000 1333333 2000000=20 By contrast, booting with arm_freq=3D2000 commented out results in: # cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_available_frequencies=20= 600000 750000 1000000 1500000 (I do not know why FreeBSD does not provide the middle frequencies in that list.) Only one frequency is common to both lists. Trying arm_freq=3D2100 results in: # cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_available_frequencies 600000 700000 840000 1050000 1400000 2100000 That has one frequency in common with the prior two lists, in fact with only one of the two lists. (Again, while I've been able to boot with arm_freq=3D2100, the result has never been reliable when tested for such. So I do not use it beyond such boot-and-look activities.) My guess is that either the u-boot used or FreeBSD or both do not deal with making the matching frequency lists for a specified boot-time goal frequency. The uefi context ends up giving no control after booting (for as much as is currently supported by both uefi and FreeBSD) and so does not (yet) need to have to have any alternative frequencies. > If I don't set it in the sysctl, speed becomes dynamic according to > load. dynamic via powerd vs. without powerd (or other such)? >> . . . >=20 > How are you booting your rpi4s if not via u-boot? You're setting = parameters in > config.txt for the rpi4 ? I've been using material from https://github.com/pftf/RPi4/releases/ as reported in an earlier reply. None of the environments are complete combinations of materials yet. Each has its tradeoffs or things to manage. =3D=3D=3D Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away in early 2018-Mar) From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Mon Sep 7 20:37:49 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4D013D6273 for ; Mon, 7 Sep 2020 20:37:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from thomas-bsd@skibo.net) Received: from camel.birch.relay.mailchannels.net (camel.birch.relay.mailchannels.net [23.83.209.29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Blg8D32vzz3Sfp for ; Mon, 7 Sep 2020 20:37:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from thomas-bsd@skibo.net) X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|thomas-bsd@skibo.net Received: from relay.mailchannels.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E123C12081D; Mon, 7 Sep 2020 20:37:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a43.g.dreamhost.com (100-96-7-103.trex.outbound.svc.cluster.local [100.96.7.103]) (Authenticated sender: dreamhost) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 607F612155E; Mon, 7 Sep 2020 20:37:45 +0000 (UTC) X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|thomas-bsd@skibo.net Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a43.g.dreamhost.com (pop.dreamhost.com [64.90.62.162]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384) by 0.0.0.0:2500 (trex/5.18.9); Mon, 07 Sep 2020 20:37:45 +0000 X-MC-Relay: Neutral X-MailChannels-SenderId: dreamhost|x-authsender|thomas-bsd@skibo.net X-MailChannels-Auth-Id: dreamhost X-Tangy-Shoe: 617be14305c18687_1599511065706_4126960635 X-MC-Loop-Signature: 1599511065706:3095547973 X-MC-Ingress-Time: 1599511065705 Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a43.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a43.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1ABEE804AA; Mon, 7 Sep 2020 13:37:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=skibo.net; h=date:from:to :cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type :in-reply-to; s=skibo.net; bh=wS7cEoFHPRSMVPj/wrVuqFQIsKw=; b=rW gqdGGankTGOL5vm7yle/KtB6IaBEMYSRw/EvzM6Mi5MeJd8xooGF+s7uBPaQ+lgT ZBSY3FMc5aIhrqA4Qs2sIEdsPKZuEU0MkicFhCobbP87Po5eBeRCRRe4EGf1+apB Ob499SNrRrGQfHCyMdPbTyh2h4icpPSIH1DM3s2Gc= Received: from bentley (c-98-35-230-191.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [98.35.230.191]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: thomas-bsd@skibo.net) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a43.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 852BB80444; Mon, 7 Sep 2020 13:37:44 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2020 13:37:42 -0700 X-DH-BACKEND: pdx1-sub0-mail-a43 From: Thomas Skibo To: Michal Meloun Cc: Oskar Holmlund , "freebsd-arm@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: ti_scm_syscon driver Message-ID: <20200907203742.GA951@bentley> References: <20200907003039.GA45956@bentley> <1637384248.2885428.1599468019032@mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-VR-OUT-STATUS: OK X-VR-OUT-SCORE: -100 X-VR-OUT-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduiedrudehtddgudehfecutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucggtfgfnhhsuhgsshgtrhhisggvpdfftffgtefojffquffvnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenucfjughrpeffhffvuffkfhggtggujgesthdtredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhmrghsucfukhhisghouceothhhohhmrghsqdgsshgusehskhhisghordhnvghtqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeevtedtvdeggfegudelfeeuvdejvdeufeevhedufeetvedvkeeghffhtdetgfejjeenucffohhmrghinhepkhgvrhhnvghlrdhorhhgnecukfhppeelkedrfeehrddvfedtrdduledunecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmohguvgepshhmthhppdhhvghlohepsggvnhhtlhgvhidpihhnvghtpeelkedrfeehrddvfedtrdduledupdhrvghtuhhrnhdqphgrthhhpefvhhhomhgrshcuufhkihgsohcuoehthhhomhgrshdqsghsugesshhkihgsohdrnhgvtheqpdhmrghilhhfrhhomhepthhhohhmrghsqdgsshgusehskhhisghordhnvghtpdhnrhgtphhtthhopehfrhgvvggsshguqdgrrhhmsehfrhgvvggsshgurdhorhhg X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Blg8D32vzz3Sfp X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=skibo.net header.s=skibo.net header.b=rW gqdGG; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of thomas-bsd@skibo.net designates 23.83.209.29 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=thomas-bsd@skibo.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.91 / 15.00]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:23.83.208.0/20]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[skibo.net:+]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.92)[-0.920]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[gmail.com]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:36483, ipnet:23.83.208.0/21, country:CA]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.01)[-1.014]; RCVD_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[6]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[skibo.net:s=skibo.net]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.97)[-0.972]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[skibo.net]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[23.83.209.29:from]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[23.83.209.29:from]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; FREEMAIL_CC(0.00)[yahoo.com,freebsd.org]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-arm] X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2020 20:37:49 -0000 On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 11:56:39AM +0200, Michal Meloun wrote: > > > On 07.09.2020 10:40, Oskar Holmlund via freebsd-arm wrote: > > > > Hi Thomas, > > > > I'm sorry I've caused you trouble with ti_scm_syscon.c catchall for syscon. > > > > I will try to point out the situation from TI dts. > > (head) sys/gnu/dts/arm/am33xx-l4.dtsi from line 270 the control module are defined and 286 the syscon part. > > The Control module are described here > > https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/omap/ctrl.txt > > the syscon part is not directly documented for TI its just there in the example. > > (of course this exist https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/syscon.txt ) > > > > I'm glad for any suggestions to solve the issue to not interfere with other drivers. > > I can test your proposal to lower the priority. > > Or get TI to change syscon to something more specific in the DTS? > > Maybe its better if i hardcode ti_scm.c to add the syscon child and remove the probe part from ti_scm_syscon.c? > > Other suggestions? > > > > I completely overlooked this problem in review, sorry for that. > I think that we should delete ti_scm_syscon driver at all - it doesn't > contain a single bit of TI specific code and it incorrectly steals pure > "syscon" compatibility string. > Instead, we should expand existing existing extres/syscon_generic driver > and teach it about ???simple-bus" compatibility string. Exactly as we > already do in fdt/simple_mfd driver. > Thomas, priority returned by bus_probe method works only for drivers > probed at same bus_pass (in other word, bus_pass have precedence over > priority returned by bus_probe() method. That???s also mean that more > specific syscon driver must be probed at BUS_PASS_DEFAULT bus pass or > earlier. > > Both fact (priority interference with bus pass and very late syscon > instantiation - syscon should be one of first drivers available) looks > like bugs for me... > > I will try to fix existing syscon_generic ASAP. > Michal > Thanks for the replies. It sounds like anything with simple-mfd and/or syscon shouldn't have any functionality in the top node and everything should be delegated to drivers attached to the subnodes. I have moved the clock functionality to a seperate driver but there are some miscellaneous registers that aren't even covered by the the subnodes' reg properties (and the ranges property is broken too). I'll probably have to rethink all this. So, don't go out of your way for me. I only brought it up because I thought it would affect many other boards. Thanks. --Thomas Skibo From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Mon Sep 7 23:58:11 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 864C13D97EB for ; Mon, 7 Sep 2020 23:58:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tech-lists@zyxst.net) Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BllbQ43Byz3dx0 for ; Mon, 7 Sep 2020 23:58:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tech-lists@zyxst.net) Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 992CC5C008E for ; Mon, 7 Sep 2020 19:58:09 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 07 Sep 2020 19:58:09 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zyxst.net; h= date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=fm3; bh=dpg7fIVpiZmruLXoaN1yKe9v3Ch +BCd96SseBFXCco8=; b=i54OJcSM3O5viJldIJJhgu0G2AOs9L5iLi3nFspmioh 6SNzX6Y+ZOXy6aBTGOepPbrpVcWpxYxJ2J6Ij0GoijuxaTlJnk9XY/VTAVZ7qge7 xxYHvT3Gz37XDl+ytM5kRXaJCNtCjV3238tW0Okd7QIaJuI5z9ZoXXUTpO9glk+K Ol/4L5AV0y6vw3hl0YkQzA/somGpozWm8uZTMRO/XPeEmVFVYxgPCzmhRnp+QN+J vC0MhH7V8shJ8kWKE7NBMdPLkfviFKLceGFt/fp3+l8L8O+v24LKVb7vZbdTQ0Fh lxCD6doT511NFAzLUSI9MWv2pqOlVpE4Jmyu//eWcCw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=dpg7fI VpiZmruLXoaN1yKe9v3Ch+BCd96SseBFXCco8=; b=J9y/0CNdr0SKw+JKW/ge1A bIDArotfUzFCAhxaBWDVhDET9bbrNZoHwh6RxjWXv3Snmfvcv7g5gfNglyRSW+7W msvH8TG4nkvMndI0c0RrRYX0x6UXjMjqxoefWI62wWT5MaiSqd0z+4MGjBbBybpc muk8z2UkD9nHRlIKnhfEd1w7ZgRDJZhJq3KwukrZUXeUpUTBW8v9OGEQbP5d0UEI qQ8AsUjcNcl8vG2fuqLAsys8H9fA9l8gQ++ZjBR1FaUkDhCfvgaZHL16ilSPRWFQ tbMzoXJ0JtAVfQ9bnprWPbxMzoHc/U2Z34UOXMwD2s+lUDB6nH9EN5YuAaVXS66w == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduiedrudehuddgvdehucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpeffhffvuffkfhggtggujgesghdtre ertddtvdenucfhrhhomhepthgvtghhqdhlihhsthhsuceothgvtghhqdhlihhsthhsseii hiigshhtrdhnvghtqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpedtheeigfdvudefkeekvddtfedvte dttdekuddvgeevlefftdekffdujedvhfduteenucfkphepkedvrdejtddrledurdelleen ucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehtvggthh dqlhhishhtshesiiihgihsthdrnhgvth X-ME-Proxy: Received: from bastion.zyxst.net (bastion.zyxst.net [82.70.91.99]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 061833064674 for ; Mon, 7 Sep 2020 19:58:08 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2020 00:57:39 +0100 From: tech-lists To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: rpi4 / will zfs work? Message-ID: <20200907235739.GA30073@bastion.zyxst.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org References: <20200904234219.GE80905@bastion.zyxst.net> <20200905105309.GF80905@bastion.zyxst.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="J2SCkAp4GZ/dPZZf" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200905105309.GF80905@bastion.zyxst.net> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BllbQ43Byz3dx0 X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=zyxst.net header.s=fm3 header.b=i54OJcSM; dkim=pass header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm3 header.b=J9y/0CNd; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of tech-lists@zyxst.net designates 66.111.4.27 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=tech-lists@zyxst.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.16 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[zyxst.net:s=fm3,messagingengine.com:s=fm3]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.97)[-0.974]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_GOOD(0.00)[66.111.4.27:from]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:66.111.4.27]; MIME_GOOD(-0.20)[multipart/signed,text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-arm@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.99)[-0.991]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[zyxst.net]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[zyxst.net:+,messagingengine.com:+]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.50)[-0.497]; SIGNED_PGP(-2.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:11403, ipnet:66.111.4.0/24, country:US]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-arm]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[66.111.4.27:from] X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2020 23:58:11 -0000 --J2SCkAp4GZ/dPZZf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Sep 05, 2020 at 11:52:42AM +0100, tech-lists wrote: >On Sat, Sep 05, 2020 at 12:41:52AM +0100, tech-lists wrote: > >>should it work? > >it's there now, after building and booting GENERIC, just need to test: > >freebsd@rpi4:~ % kldstat >Id Refs Address Size Name > 1 27 0xffff000000000000 117d148 kernel > 2 1 0xffff000070400000 40f000 zfs.ko > 3 1 0xffff00007080f000 26000 cryptodev.ko > 4 1 0xffff000070835000 24000 uhid.ko > 5 1 0xffff000070859000 26000 ums.ko > 6 1 0xffff00007087f000 22000 pflog.ko > 7 1 0xffff0000708a1000 5a000 pf.ko > 8 1 0xffff0000708fb000 22000 mac_ntpd.ko Although it seems to work, the pool isn't saved on reboot :( 1. zpool create data /dev/da0p2 2. zfs create data/stuff 3. zfs set compression=3Dlz4 data/stuff 4. zfs set mountpoint=3D/home/stuff data/stuff 5. zfs list (to make sure it's all as it should be) 6. sync && reboot 7. zpool status (no pools defined or available) should zfs work with arm64? with u-boot? thanks --=20 J. --J2SCkAp4GZ/dPZZf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEE8n3tWhxW11Ccvv9/s8o7QhFzNAUFAl9WyQUACgkQs8o7QhFz NAWK1w//Q9R1lbQeAQK2+KZzBeznts/0nv127eGL7vMwY3m4QbgiDi81sO7z0h8l Dmhh0t7EzyiYLbsP1hI36il+OpAsErc4gEZr1eE7ukkm9Eon6+3bVMD/Gmxd1BcL L5RCWWXs0p11Zbej4h+sUJ+Hzlfr0mtmEPkylXMrks9zHtGR+dTw9R8B9ThP0Cs9 9Riujnlow4/DMo1T6ck83hzb4GQ/WZ9GvZ6/HHALBLkUqB7gF9kbw289ZgRtfazK KgiJeTYrE4NmPc3hR3QXFDo/adMkdJw7qqYr7qa/C5zmc/pdvTRQNRFNWu/4MTjJ DmUNqu2Olsk/GtyJlT3Nz95HFYcAzbAnYAxOOUyHS/+eeTxq6tKBnAyMam+R6sSB ZoKlqOK+6+zbYHcNLLer1OrPrR/ZfGrgQtG8mth2KUDEFfz2gmZzDeddyTofVaif 6zbp/qHjcwvLvZlPIdWVekddoob1rAb2gL3MruhcottlGPGLT0xMYkCacY6keNct 8umx647gWAB0nhcJQTboLxEjAPsAnW+MyhOAqOKq8ludtDr3O4Meg+A171NsMAds HyRvurre0bZlg3vtFY4NDugIv41PxWJ8QiDlvAIAkp3ppVoNWb7w5Vp5v0g+Fby4 RwzaluXhbqau2mibSBl2m+44pAcSTm8FH8ddSlv5UqAyck9taVQ= =hiHb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --J2SCkAp4GZ/dPZZf-- From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Tue Sep 8 02:55:41 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3B783DFE57 for ; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 02:55:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-arm@darkain.com) Received: from MTA-08-4.privateemail.com (mta-08-4.privateemail.com [198.54.122.58]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BlqXD56kRz45N3 for ; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 02:55:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-arm@darkain.com) Received: from MTA-08.privateemail.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by MTA-08.privateemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD51760056 for ; Mon, 7 Sep 2020 22:55:24 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail-io1-f50.google.com (unknown [10.20.151.202]) by MTA-08.privateemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 49A576004A for ; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 02:55:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-io1-f50.google.com with SMTP id y13so1363971iow.4 for ; Mon, 07 Sep 2020 19:55:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533ojsP4D6eQ2QWoUwFAmNKp880R0+bys0Ab3eN8rPuD6rA/GoPw ssgT6eosxuSOpCLQD8yHDAarqZ5kGJq28r0YSrw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwaU+peA1sTk0Ux9136q6ThFFUKT8P4gbAGPKyJfyZwFgcoP3yfvP/ziCa3+N1eWRqN0uwOrQbt/yLRYmkGD8I= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6638:148c:: with SMTP id j12mr22291535jak.70.1599533714554; Mon, 07 Sep 2020 19:55:14 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200904234219.GE80905@bastion.zyxst.net> <20200905105309.GF80905@bastion.zyxst.net> <20200907235739.GA30073@bastion.zyxst.net> In-Reply-To: <20200907235739.GA30073@bastion.zyxst.net> From: Vincent Milum Jr Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2020 19:54:58 -0700 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: rpi4 / will zfs work? To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BlqXD56kRz45N3 X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of freebsd-arm@darkain.com designates 198.54.122.58 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=freebsd-arm@darkain.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.75 / 15.00]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:198.54.122.32/27]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-arm@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.93)[-0.932]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[darkain.com]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.12)[0.122]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[198.54.122.58:from]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.64)[-0.639]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; ASN(0.00)[asn:22612, ipnet:198.54.122.0/24, country:US]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-arm] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.33 X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2020 02:55:42 -0000 Just run "zpool import" after reboot, if you don't have it set to auto-import. It works. I'm using it for a few different things right now. I have a pool running over a year on a Pi3b+ and now I have a pool running on the Pinebook Pro. On Mon, Sep 7, 2020 at 4:57 PM tech-lists wrote: > On Sat, Sep 05, 2020 at 11:52:42AM +0100, tech-lists wrote: > >On Sat, Sep 05, 2020 at 12:41:52AM +0100, tech-lists wrote: > > > >>should it work? > > > >it's there now, after building and booting GENERIC, just need to test: > > > >freebsd@rpi4:~ % kldstat > >Id Refs Address Size Name > > 1 27 0xffff000000000000 117d148 kernel > > 2 1 0xffff000070400000 40f000 zfs.ko > > 3 1 0xffff00007080f000 26000 cryptodev.ko > > 4 1 0xffff000070835000 24000 uhid.ko > > 5 1 0xffff000070859000 26000 ums.ko > > 6 1 0xffff00007087f000 22000 pflog.ko > > 7 1 0xffff0000708a1000 5a000 pf.ko > > 8 1 0xffff0000708fb000 22000 mac_ntpd.ko > > Although it seems to work, the pool isn't saved on reboot :( > > 1. zpool create data /dev/da0p2 > 2. zfs create data/stuff > 3. zfs set compression=lz4 data/stuff > 4. zfs set mountpoint=/home/stuff data/stuff > 5. zfs list (to make sure it's all as it should be) > 6. sync && reboot > 7. zpool status (no pools defined or available) > > should zfs work with arm64? with u-boot? > > thanks > -- > J. > From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Tue Sep 8 06:59:42 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96CA23E5A2B for ; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 06:59:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from agapon@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lf1-f68.google.com (mail-lf1-f68.google.com [209.85.167.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Blwxn04XJz4LvX for ; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 06:59:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from agapon@gmail.com) Received: by mail-lf1-f68.google.com with SMTP id x77so8592175lfa.0 for ; Mon, 07 Sep 2020 23:59:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:openpgp:autocrypt :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=0A7j/CnO+NPoUqkpqTGaJeEhc9WISj2AvmEwktohLNM=; b=UHMbOpJL2hjkFpK0p/3eIv0dTxy1O3ndJrxb9u43DDlXUFRHDlq08cjByNtJ7yf5R3 GHzSU0MuVR0YCJOP6V3GwF/v+TYYDRaSzHa+oZ73qADSsD+93D2Jof94KoqHd7z3/4pS f1AW3++3frOLw3AZ3vNmronznZ7Nby8utVXrsGfmPqbxEe1iR7iIa9Dbwn6SjVtokfmY bR2sYQjTzHBVnFqc3f2VY9fuJK+Ww5JAxBcEZp4TFiBpuDWSei0FSCoaCVlLZzRlwfA7 VuVu7lUTW+srB6CcKOejjGPimHKUo60zq0pfUAVs1hAt9K6nWaC7DR4Wcr6UI/nY3h5i 2DhA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533C5qTOhd1O1uai3zWjDcRInz8Lc7gpU0/0c3VL3H8YXgu6q+hz JaCzpG1kjqBNebjrWcA9pyoMT4AL5Dc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzkycLStscbgSIPdi7N1OmecGPcAL+z6BTH/FVnllRobWSkM+5TrVWy0cDXiolInpvV8DPxpw== X-Received: by 2002:a19:cc4d:: with SMTP id c74mr9480001lfg.188.1599548378700; Mon, 07 Sep 2020 23:59:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.88] (east.meadow.volia.net. [93.72.151.96]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id p19sm2907720lfc.22.2020.09.07.23.59.37 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 07 Sep 2020 23:59:37 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: MMCCAM - Re: onboard wireless on rpi4 To: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" , bob prohaska Cc: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org References: <20200904134619.GB80905@bastion.zyxst.net> <69934262-D9D3-4986-849D-9E8221D1E387@kronometrix.org> <1677459627.55.1599232125847@localhost> <75E08DC2-D229-45AA-85AE-CCF06FD0B490@kronometrix.org> <09959D86-E3E3-43E9-8134-C2FC73343DBA@lists.zabbadoz.net> <507782579.41.1599484468967@localhost> <20200907152118.GA89696@www.zefox.net> <40D76B81-934B-43A4-B269-E075D2F4B4CD@lists.zabbadoz.net> From: Andriy Gapon Openpgp: preference=signencrypt Autocrypt: addr=avg@FreeBSD.org; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= mQINBFm4LIgBEADNB/3lT7f15UKeQ52xCFQx/GqHkSxEdVyLFZTmY3KyNPQGBtyvVyBfprJ7 mAeXZWfhat6cKNRAGZcL5EmewdQuUfQfBdYmKjbw3a9GFDsDNuhDA2QwFt8BmkiVMRYyvI7l N0eVzszWCUgdc3qqM6qqcgBaqsVmJluwpvwp4ZBXmch5BgDDDb1MPO8AZ2QZfIQmplkj8Y6Z AiNMknkmgaekIINSJX8IzRzKD5WwMsin70psE8dpL/iBsA2cpJGzWMObVTtCxeDKlBCNqM1i gTXta1ukdUT7JgLEFZk9ceYQQMJJtUwzWu1UHfZn0Fs29HTqawfWPSZVbulbrnu5q55R4PlQ /xURkWQUTyDpqUvb4JK371zhepXiXDwrrpnyyZABm3SFLkk2bHlheeKU6Yql4pcmSVym1AS4 dV8y0oHAfdlSCF6tpOPf2+K9nW1CFA8b/tw4oJBTtfZ1kxXOMdyZU5fiG7xb1qDgpQKgHUX8 7Rd2T1UVLVeuhYlXNw2F+a2ucY+cMoqz3LtpksUiBppJhw099gEXehcN2JbUZ2TueJdt1FdS ztnZmsHUXLxrRBtGwqnFL7GSd6snpGIKuuL305iaOGODbb9c7ne1JqBbkw1wh8ci6vvwGlzx rexzimRaBzJxlkjNfMx8WpCvYebGMydNoeEtkWldtjTNVsUAtQARAQABtB5BbmRyaXkgR2Fw b24gPGF2Z0BGcmVlQlNELm9yZz6JAlQEEwEIAD4WIQS+LEO7ngQnXA4Bjr538m7TUc1yjwUC WbgsiAIbIwUJBaOagAULCQgHAgYVCAkKCwIEFgIDAQIeAQIXgAAKCRB38m7TUc1yj+JAEACV l9AK/nOWAt/9cufV2fRj0hdOqB1aCshtSrwHk/exXsDa4/FkmegxXQGY+3GWX3deIyesbVRL rYdtdK0dqJyT1SBqXK1h3/at9rxr9GQA6KWOxTjUFURsU7ok/6SIlm8uLRPNKO+yq0GDjgaO LzN+xykuBA0FlhQAXJnpZLcVfPJdWv7sSHGedL5ln8P8rxR+XnmsA5TUaaPcbhTB+mG+iKFj GghASDSfGqLWFPBlX/fpXikBDZ1gvOr8nyMY9nXhgfXpq3B6QCRYKPy58ChrZ5weeJZ29b7/ QdEO8NFNWHjSD9meiLdWQaqo9Y7uUxN3wySc/YUZxtS0bhAd8zJdNPsJYG8sXgKjeBQMVGuT eCAJFEYJqbwWvIXMfVWop4+O4xB+z2YE3jAbG/9tB/GSnQdVSj3G8MS80iLS58frnt+RSEw/ psahrfh0dh6SFHttE049xYiC+cM8J27Aaf0i9RflyITq57NuJm+AHJoU9SQUkIF0nc6lfA+o JRiyRlHZHKoRQkIg4aiKaZSWjQYRl5Txl0IZUP1dSWMX4s3XTMurC/pnja45dge/4ESOtJ9R 8XuIWg45Oq6MeIWdjKddGhRj3OohsltKgkEU3eLKYtB6qRTQypHHUawCXz88uYt5e3w4V16H lCpSTZV/EVHnNe45FVBlvK7k7HFfDDkryLkCDQRZuCyIARAAlq0slcsVboY/+IUJdcbEiJRW be9HKVz4SUchq0z9MZPX/0dcnvz/gkyYA+OuM78dNS7Mbby5dTvOqfpLJfCuhaNYOhlE0wY+ 1T6Tf1f4c/uA3U/YiadukQ3+6TJuYGAdRZD5EqYFIkreARTVWg87N9g0fT9BEqLw9lJtEGDY EWUE7L++B8o4uu3LQFEYxcrb4K/WKmgtmFcm77s0IKDrfcX4doV92QTIpLiRxcOmCC/OCYuO jB1oaaqXQzZrCutXRK0L5XN1Y1PYjIrEzHMIXmCDlLYnpFkK+itlXwlE2ZQxkfMruCWdQXye syl2fynAe8hvp7Mms9qU2r2K9EcJiR5N1t1C2/kTKNUhcRv7Yd/vwusK7BqJbhlng5ZgRx0m WxdntU/JLEntz3QBsBsWM9Y9wf2V4tLv6/DuDBta781RsCB/UrU2zNuOEkSixlUiHxw1dccI 6CVlaWkkJBxmHX22GdDFrcjvwMNIbbyfQLuBq6IOh8nvu9vuItup7qemDG3Ms6TVwA7BD3j+ 3fGprtyW8Fd/RR2bW2+LWkMrqHffAr6Y6V3h5kd2G9Q8ZWpEJk+LG6Mk3fhZhmCnHhDu6CwN MeUvxXDVO+fqc3JjFm5OxhmfVeJKrbCEUJyM8ESWLoNHLqjywdZga4Q7P12g8DUQ1mRxYg/L HgZY3zfKOqcAEQEAAYkCPAQYAQgAJhYhBL4sQ7ueBCdcDgGOvnfybtNRzXKPBQJZuCyIAhsM BQkFo5qAAAoJEHfybtNRzXKPBVwQAKfFy9P7N3OsLDMB56A4Kf+ZT+d5cIx0Yiaf4n6w7m3i ImHHHk9FIetI4Xe54a2IXh4Bq5UkAGY0667eIs+Z1Ea6I2i27Sdo7DxGwq09Qnm/Y65ADvXs 3aBvokCcm7FsM1wky395m8xUos1681oV5oxgqeRI8/76qy0hD9WR65UW+HQgZRIcIjSel9vR XDaD2HLGPTTGr7u4v00UeTMs6qvPsa2PJagogrKY8RXdFtXvweQFz78NbXhluwix2Tb9ETPk LIpDrtzV73CaE2aqBG/KrboXT2C67BgFtnk7T7Y7iKq4/XvEdDWscz2wws91BOXuMMd4c/c4 OmGW9m3RBLufFrOag1q5yUS9QbFfyqL6dftJP3Zq/xe+mr7sbWbhPVCQFrH3r26mpmy841ym dwQnNcsbIGiBASBSKksOvIDYKa2Wy8htPmWFTEOPRpFXdGQ27awcjjnB42nngyCK5ukZDHi6 w0qK5DNQQCkiweevCIC6wc3p67jl1EMFY5+z+zdTPb3h7LeVnGqW0qBQl99vVFgzLxchKcl0 R/paSFgwqXCZhAKMuUHncJuynDOP7z5LirUeFI8qsBAJi1rXpQoLJTVcW72swZ42IdPiboqx NbTMiNOiE36GqMcTPfKylCbF45JNX4nF9ElM0E+Y8gi4cizJYBRr2FBJgay0b9Cp Message-ID: <98fb91a8-00e3-4b5c-3b0f-efa2c51388bc@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2020 09:59:36 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/60.0 Thunderbird/60.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <40D76B81-934B-43A4-B269-E075D2F4B4CD@lists.zabbadoz.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Blwxn04XJz4LvX X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of agapon@gmail.com designates 209.85.167.68 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=agapon@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.67 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:209.85.128.0/17]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.72)[-0.725]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[avg@FreeBSD.org,agapon@gmail.com]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[93.72.151.96:received]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[avg@FreeBSD.org,agapon@gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:209.85.128.0/17, country:US]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.97)[-0.971]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.97)[-0.972]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-arm@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[FreeBSD.org]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[209.85.167.68:from]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[209.85.167.68:from]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-arm] X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2020 06:59:42 -0000 On 07/09/2020 19:18, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: > On 7 Sep 2020, at 15:21, bob prohaska wrote: > >> On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 03:14:28PM +0200, Ronald Klop wrote: >>> >>> I've MMCCAM running since 12.1-BETA1 on rpi3B+. No problems so far. >>> Apparently I'm to only one :-) >>> https://dmesgd.nycbug.org/index.cgi?do=index&fts=mmccam >>> >> >> I just gave it a spin on a Pi3B (not +) and was rewarded with a >> panic. The machine boots from a USB mechanical disk. Sources are >> at 365355. Here's the console output: >> >> http://www.zefox.net/~fbsd/rpi3/GENERIC-MMCCAM/console >> >> I'll give the corresponding vanilla GENERIC kernel a try shortly, but 364900 >> boots without trouble. > > This seems to be a FDT/loader thing;  others will know more about what it means. Bjoern, I think that you didn't scroll down enough. The real panic is down there. It looks like a page fault or something like that in sddastart. Perhaps a stack overflow? Kernel page fault with the following non-sleepable locks held: ... #2 0xffff00000073d35c at data_abort+0xe4 #3 0xffff00000073cd38 at do_el1h_sync+0x14c #4 0xffff000000724078 at handle_el1h_sync+0x78 #5 0xffff0000000f7d68 at sddastart+0xa8 Bob, I noticed this: (sdda0:sdhci_slot0:0:0:0): Partition 0 -> 8265462 Perhaps r365445 might be of some help. P.S. I found this article about ARMv8 and handle_el1h_sync: https://community.arm.com/developer/ip-products/processors/b/processors-ip-blog/posts/semihalf-arm-blog-2-dead-board-and-stack-growth It has some theory but not sure if it help in practice. -- Andriy Gapon From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Tue Sep 8 12:29:21 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8A1633707F for ; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 12:29:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tech-lists@zyxst.net) Received: from wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Bm4G906nXz4gL5 for ; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 12:29:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tech-lists@zyxst.net) Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB16F7AE for ; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 08:29:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 08 Sep 2020 08:29:18 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zyxst.net; h= date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=fm3; bh=OsEJpj40/QudezEdRX/iuvVF1Uc JuDkFP7hEa69fe9A=; b=SZVGJoNUu1UqI5nDxIq472S+UvnFW+8qCOzpbbJmxdd 8jw9TbRsv16IaeJmTg141dsyuG+pnH+a1qaHcVcgQL9txM9tD99CxC9hozCZYtmg /Xe0ea8kHiDTYjMCsb0qC+cQWMxe1oABikhMpclZt+NpW+whntbLglA9IMWMvVuZ m5IyQOCPONPgo4FDk7NwVflE/lcT+7Olk4rBZuXWfu0higjJ/Txdu66VfRVECqr/ /NFcYpAeARNJ8o/pxOKS24IrwbVfkMaSKy8MAjxJ/e3FzXF3pxDvW1Dwmbn0tEGZ VGmwNU8MvWuM2KoFPkEuPrXuEYegqiATxeKnEeEa82Q== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=OsEJpj 40/QudezEdRX/iuvVF1UcJuDkFP7hEa69fe9A=; b=GhpCgs9fymHmkanTis79AF 91JBdOKtFUetUweIfayjQbqHROZuWSdjduPupepazjXXA9yaqBP5OI6D/QQlV6ga ULKBBRxSWSNZdGZ4RGqahXibiP9FFGSFEv/21Py/loTRU1SfZ4yRsUFrg5iSJGYd qhG5lQv2OuvfMxo0GDdJ2+suNnb6innK6J0GrCVUHllFlimIcyuXTEE7zilqRwxX XZBGSqijm02jcTjVAg+BnzDk0fzkN0FXkbu60irqDbBnaDb336ljjkunvnGW4ycM GicTwJ2ur96OGOHcTt5ljZ6sFibDgcjJqzmnqsswkAKyjUV+HQQEZ806pQPw8mdA == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduiedrudehfedgfeehucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpeffhffvuffkfhggtggujgesghdtre ertddtvdenucfhrhhomhepthgvtghhqdhlihhsthhsuceothgvtghhqdhlihhsthhsseii hiigshhtrdhnvghtqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpedtheeigfdvudefkeekvddtfedvte dttdekuddvgeevlefftdekffdujedvhfduteenucfkphepkedvrdejtddrledurdelleen ucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehtvggthh dqlhhishhtshesiiihgihsthdrnhgvth X-ME-Proxy: Received: from bastion.zyxst.net (bastion.zyxst.net [82.70.91.99]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id D7F52328005D for ; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 08:29:17 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2020 13:28:48 +0100 From: tech-lists To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: rpi4 / will zfs work? Message-ID: <20200908122848.GB30073@bastion.zyxst.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org References: <20200904234219.GE80905@bastion.zyxst.net> <20200905105309.GF80905@bastion.zyxst.net> <20200907235739.GA30073@bastion.zyxst.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="/WwmFnJnmDyWGHa4" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Bm4G906nXz4gL5 X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=zyxst.net header.s=fm3 header.b=SZVGJoNU; dkim=pass header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm3 header.b=GhpCgs9f; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of tech-lists@zyxst.net designates 64.147.123.21 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=tech-lists@zyxst.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.07 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[zyxst.net:s=fm3,messagingengine.com:s=fm3]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[64.147.123.21:from]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:64.147.123.21]; MIME_GOOD(-0.20)[multipart/signed,text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-arm@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.99)[-0.990]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[zyxst.net]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[zyxst.net:+,messagingengine.com:+]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.40)[-0.397]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.99)[-0.988]; SIGNED_PGP(-2.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:11403, ipnet:64.147.123.0/24, country:US]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-arm]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[64.147.123.21:from] X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2020 12:29:21 -0000 --/WwmFnJnmDyWGHa4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 07:54:31PM -0700, Vincent Milum Jr wrote: >Just run "zpool import" after reboot, if you don't have it set to >auto-import. It works. I'm using it for a few different things right now. I >have a pool running over a year on a Pi3b+ and now I have a pool running on >the Pinebook Pro. Thanks for that, which worked :D I don't know why it's not auto-importing though. I have this in rc.conf : [...] zfs_enable=3D"YES" zfsd_enable=3D"YES" [...] I've just set this after looking through zfs properties on # zfs set canmount data NAME PROPERTY VALUE SOURCE data canmount on local # I'll reboot to test after it's rebuilt all installed ports with portmaster = -af --=20 J. --/WwmFnJnmDyWGHa4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEE8n3tWhxW11Ccvv9/s8o7QhFzNAUFAl9XeRIACgkQs8o7QhFz NAVCKQ//UiT35UqK5wPgPf/fAZfqBdFJ8V1KrUw1ukEUPCCliLtu4OFkdpby98ap oMuH8jjoiwWuuUGl/xCtFou/hZzboAvtzkimJgIBahoDz0sr5DkGhiNTvBFNVOVJ gQi1jScgcdXVCsbqMTmzpjbi9BcnqSDm0CZjqKT23OF5QEeZbhvfQHDQefojEQH9 9H52md448G85Z4kbkbtRAwuaK9nfT5+FwPMo0LVxO226VCZuYyKINAgKCditq5dZ //YSXYZh9JJCXumqZkQZkD6nhBaEPC5eqxuBxaFmTte1EHkIW1sXbf52vVjskfbJ Qi5VhJUDneWMUkmWzeE0ZUYJgn9FuxUD3pxLiiD6iwt9PIFFZPnPgu8qimQzrfRd kLj84aN9Fpmaf81On5XccYzO6LUHO0Q3g4zL+Zs5KmWFFap3SvIleK1l5fZM96ts 0jxEKIOgrbah5fk5KjRLAR2/av0+yH/poyyTkZuBvGPHLqvzNETZjwUP+6TOU0Sp a0JyWWYg07DlHd3vgg92pvBviX2nc9ph5fiekrjZG9zdUop6Vdc4REc7x12+aVv1 U/0cT0/PKiJ83OLTAB9Uliu9M8ztWjrmUgUHPj76TcKOTijcyCRGAPKHbOOlILFt az8Sv9My2UEnWiKmdtcu2YV9DvvDRA15r/q5Zlbgpj0b4Ylu+sM= =pesX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --/WwmFnJnmDyWGHa4-- From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Tue Sep 8 12:36:41 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 441F63372F8 for ; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 12:36:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tech-lists@zyxst.net) Received: from wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Bm4Qc3rbMz3S7L for ; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 12:36:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tech-lists@zyxst.net) Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0101FC2B for ; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 08:36:38 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 08 Sep 2020 08:36:39 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zyxst.net; h= date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=fm3; bh=Ytzu4FEtCYTUtNSBtms6jc56OHt XpWQlxYu538CGsXg=; b=VxhYR4SfkcL2PAeoaJxLkX5QD1vT7bDHsO0HWU9JQLC g8+eYTgKJo16qke0Li27eCQvFFpCGAUkcVCCkNY8kZdd2cLhvGCmS7CORcQI9hhg kvUjLLY9QX/pJ2KBbE0mwoDEinQdk07Fd1/xSOvVJ389c8bVITp3a5B9/vISOtuM AxpmF6/b4G82qOZIdKdX3rDCqOFWZ+e8zv7unqaXRb0n2MtkZEA4ory9EHCobxSM c43k2ycw57bBbqeNbgslM2zVvKs+cneLSiAxk7K0Zyks1QrqlBBAsLqZhz0OgNvr DrD7AAoICp7L5nYRNzB2DRcAboSlLvqc8EVKKpzQ38g== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=Ytzu4F EtCYTUtNSBtms6jc56OHtXpWQlxYu538CGsXg=; b=eEoemz6J20y8mg4T1dUbXL aOU95x7sYQgmTQoRq2LFfriIjIFDupwKF9xSe3wB8PNPM68MDFijJx76LBW4gjkP hv7pFLVR4xF56rJMK6+7HW6ZyW76eK97xJbSbR+dDuOKAQ4PxtmHvofpl6jyFo4a 3tuLRMpO5BhLlccARRd2W+xR1dW33gLihfmGEZXbEfWGlOW39v78sbuAh94RYY1b v1FkX0dG9pRbl0dIeE5fN5TKHz0EMj4y1Rm0Uwixv3igzT9eaYtlyLMc2jkHyPEf 1Wxl4Pm4n83DpthWskbCEFLxHH4LNgroRyO1I9svKYy3mk/r2dKk2/HfZQlTX8sQ == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduiedrudehfedgfeejucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpeffhffvuffkfhggtggujgesghdtre ertddtvdenucfhrhhomhepthgvtghhqdhlihhsthhsuceothgvtghhqdhlihhsthhsseii hiigshhtrdhnvghtqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpedtheeigfdvudefkeekvddtfedvte dttdekuddvgeevlefftdekffdujedvhfduteenucfkphepkedvrdejtddrledurdelleen ucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehtvggthh dqlhhishhtshesiiihgihsthdrnhgvth X-ME-Proxy: Received: from bastion.zyxst.net (bastion.zyxst.net [82.70.91.99]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 28EF43064684 for ; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 08:36:38 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2020 13:36:09 +0100 From: tech-lists To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: rpi4 / will zfs work? Message-ID: <20200908123609.GC30073@bastion.zyxst.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org References: <20200904234219.GE80905@bastion.zyxst.net> <20200905105309.GF80905@bastion.zyxst.net> <20200907235739.GA30073@bastion.zyxst.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="XWOWbaMNXpFDWE00" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Bm4Qc3rbMz3S7L X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=zyxst.net header.s=fm3 header.b=VxhYR4Sf; dkim=pass header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm3 header.b=eEoemz6J; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of tech-lists@zyxst.net designates 64.147.123.21 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=tech-lists@zyxst.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.08 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[zyxst.net:s=fm3,messagingengine.com:s=fm3]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[64.147.123.21:from]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:64.147.123.21:c]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.20)[multipart/signed,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-arm@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.99)[-0.994]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[zyxst.net]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[zyxst.net:+,messagingengine.com:+]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.40)[-0.402]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.99)[-0.987]; SIGNED_PGP(-2.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:11403, ipnet:64.147.123.0/24, country:US]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-arm]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[64.147.123.21:from] X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2020 12:36:41 -0000 --XWOWbaMNXpFDWE00 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 07:54:31PM -0700, Vincent Milum Jr wrote: >Just run "zpool import" after reboot, if you don't have it set to >auto-import. It works. I'm using it for a few different things right now. I >have a pool running over a year on a Pi3b+ and now I have a pool running on >the Pinebook Pro. Just had a thought. I encountered the same issue with a usb3-connected hd (this time with amd64 desktop) a few years ago and it had to do with allowi= ng usb3 devices to settle before zfs loads, as the usb3 device is also the zpo= ol device. It might be that usb is taking time to load and zfs happens before that happens by default, so nothing gets loaded. I posted about it but not here. Looking for the email now --=20 J. --XWOWbaMNXpFDWE00 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEE8n3tWhxW11Ccvv9/s8o7QhFzNAUFAl9XetQACgkQs8o7QhFz NAWDaA/+PLsSQCOrkgzEak1A+FM9ImtRKN/IFJT3+lzza5bhijd1aPoQM0DOZJ6Z p9CSZDIDpPkJgwqYg86nNkN1CG9LI9sYKp0qmxYywvdRaW2j46OJuHrPKjALXBDh gJplxrvSHqJb2hgnpaSMHnU0/HlF4hrdwHfQOi0ijdqWog9IHDtYtqesi1aULSdp jRnKJCNNDulkHebeLjisXoT+a6IqC8UtUIBpb2Oq/YuWZ8TPBYucp3daO9uAXUjr nTy45Jl01iIcTQ3ItSrLL/L94tS3bvQv9fqMJJ6pbiaRDZyIIp+V58JCW+jpU9EO mSzXTRdcoICs/xs2CslNvhwiYuaXd/R0vFOcaSjQ4odtVaN1LnbQKHj/1HfF2QqD 2gp7pXSwtkArXk0iX7JnFhFzCTLpA+uqnHZ7PnfeHMwR+IwnbaQNP2Nt3J6NSTli Aoi+rs15lEmMvAbkYc0LwaAoPHf76H5x8P7jC2fwxsJdBxlMrCcEazJ5/FZ+W2sf HsMO89oZ/M6R1GWiy7huHzb38kypXyCiL0YT1vKZHNU+2ou5tRqu4CFBOOFplLII +KpNa2AEXaaJXKarJh6wMDFJq5RgQAmgev39NLFg55vefuGp66yXOxyjG2Fx0QON JoJDv+VAcA+EEQtgerdmKIF1DsUfK3y1jd+BvUi44Wh7nd9rvIk= =z3EZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --XWOWbaMNXpFDWE00-- From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Tue Sep 8 13:26:35 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA6653C8F49 for ; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 13:26:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tech-lists@zyxst.net) Received: from wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Bm5XB6S8Jz3WB2 for ; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 13:26:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tech-lists@zyxst.net) Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E8DFDD9 for ; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 09:26:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 08 Sep 2020 09:26:33 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zyxst.net; h= date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=fm3; bh=cI0i0N5FyePDgTbh0YoI6ehjvfX COFNflOaxeI4MjTE=; b=aDagBd8efLa9B5g16k5rRM/XF7CyzWdIQB6A53HOB5C 5/piWRu6ErWZ/xRyQNvLOwxRZEVrzwJkltMxcqWvNFuOI4SpfiZ6Z0HFDQ2zI5If 3J6UZdDHLAqZeu0Q3oo4IrDWh02h6874eJVRLpKnaiPADd9zxgTbTASul00+aS0I g7ZjfBrY9pBOSWGBTQg7Ju0Q2RH4O/+BHzTT46kw/tZ9FxXp/5D41MvCdLKeNR2C IMYyp4F8ksyKp+UaCAOCwn+8gyt2d+z7S9ImslAyS9GsXLjCCCcL5rx1L9hDHmRO BvOJFkNr7LCTftAPWFeavxt9cl6RfCprjCxFIRa4hBA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=cI0i0N 5FyePDgTbh0YoI6ehjvfXCOFNflOaxeI4MjTE=; b=tSerQIVCyZCDmQIxvxEgka p5yOzXkUjXhJWSpr4OW3dixfKwe09ODcU+O8hXgF6IVi+q5GgiB8VkqT65fAJuZk BlKry1/OnnARKjKqxCijC+4vRi3gXl3wufKZeG+QEWoDmNauAu2JWEX5nAw8H8KJ tS2wPFmEgJ1ExLvFb3ONnFLd45J19tML+GQt2OQ8ByfwpPu5gAGiPV12d0tkK/Dt bnisKllgDpKUHYeO7Z9X32g47OgFwWp+jjKr5tlbC2RxgTFjHqQaG3mWGqUBpO6o 8wU30Xxb++nJUUKs3EKWr/7WI8zhV9FelvccR2Kmcjh4/R/hK4nuuS2nB49j2kgQ == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduiedrudehfedggeekucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpeffhffvuffkfhggtggujgesghdtre ertddtvdenucfhrhhomhepthgvtghhqdhlihhsthhsuceothgvtghhqdhlihhsthhsseii hiigshhtrdhnvghtqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeejvddvveeltdetgedtiedvvdeuhf fgffeuheeffeffkeehudevheffjeelheetgeenucffohhmrghinheptghonhhfrdhlohgt rghlnecukfhppeekvddrjedtrdeluddrleelnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenuc frrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthgvtghhqdhlihhsthhsseiihiigshhtrdhnvght X-ME-Proxy: Received: from bastion.zyxst.net (bastion.zyxst.net [82.70.91.99]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 3CFF7306467E for ; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 09:26:32 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2020 14:26:03 +0100 From: tech-lists To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: rpi4 / will zfs work? Message-ID: <20200908132603.GD30073@bastion.zyxst.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org References: <20200904234219.GE80905@bastion.zyxst.net> <20200905105309.GF80905@bastion.zyxst.net> <20200907235739.GA30073@bastion.zyxst.net> <20200908123609.GC30073@bastion.zyxst.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="W5WqUoFLvi1M7tJE" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200908123609.GC30073@bastion.zyxst.net> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Bm5XB6S8Jz3WB2 X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=zyxst.net header.s=fm3 header.b=aDagBd8e; dkim=pass header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm3 header.b=tSerQIVC; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of tech-lists@zyxst.net designates 64.147.123.21 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=tech-lists@zyxst.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.88 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[zyxst.net:s=fm3,messagingengine.com:s=fm3]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[64.147.123.21:from]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:64.147.123.21:c]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.20)[multipart/signed,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-arm@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.99)[-0.991]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[zyxst.net]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[zyxst.net:+,messagingengine.com:+]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.20)[-0.203]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.99)[-0.988]; SIGNED_PGP(-2.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:11403, ipnet:64.147.123.0/24, country:US]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-arm]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[64.147.123.21:from] X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2020 13:26:35 -0000 --W5WqUoFLvi1M7tJE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 01:35:42PM +0100, tech-lists wrote: >Just had a thought. I encountered the same issue with a usb3-connected hd >(this time with amd64 desktop) a few years ago and it had to do with allow= ing >usb3 devices to settle before zfs loads, as the usb3 device is also the zp= ool >device. It might be that usb is taking time to load and zfs happens before >that happens by default, so nothing gets loaded. > >I posted about it but not here. Looking for the email now managed to solve this by making zfs_enable=3D"YES" zfsd_enable=3D"YES" the last two lines in /etc/rc.conf, meaning that guessing the problem was usb3 loading later than zfs was correct. Maybe it's be an idea to put it in rc.conf.local instead, hmm --=20 J. --W5WqUoFLvi1M7tJE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEE8n3tWhxW11Ccvv9/s8o7QhFzNAUFAl9Xhn0ACgkQs8o7QhFz NAXe7w//T8lIFKoD9PBapnPyZ56k3vxdkn75TtteCTWsxTSxrmer4vTudu/AKpeb rG/ew1R+dTNGz2QRWmzL6jt0bnUbLukufjDs+LbReCdxgDMfnvtuoyW9S+ZE1hXa jwwhep3HxqImlijFe8cAfe4gq27eN9+H8a+tB/94wDyBFgaPKVNgEkBs00Tabpcm vT9uUZX2fJWTXfpelTjKrTBBG5GIZjYzFZDPA90e/JqF3Vh8SVdsOaQf48EYGiDh FxYsA8ZFjkiHR5LdTcOrt4JLLNZMlecEyT3TeaxbxE1q9HhFWUdJRIsjtRHRgLFb Y6IQs+Jq0PRp0mul6NTRMDxQ3C5GEN+B839Z8GoPjxSykzd0ztU2J4NKlLg+uiFg WsAXehF2cN1feQGIUZG8biJ8uLDjoGLG9K4uy1Z/dCtSYTnD+tZkbWcQcHXPmBVy zfvAS1a6A2Ga95C03G0jVatdOrG7ZwN7T9uO2J4lA8xW3h5Do8QMglgNOT2EIekA BIUs1OrMgYmrsFhSXZWIhI30hZCP6yZZVfczhOF3ZQkDSe2aDtfktUEdDm5lZmbQ QScbiplzWaNL+rIVO/yMZf/JiNSu9mK19RepGZWAu6BrISVSwVEnIs2KIDrKjRwk P5oJ/tHRkqxyykIrSBonQa3xlZtdMe3Xd27UT96SpJPlVJJyeXw= =hWjF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --W5WqUoFLvi1M7tJE-- From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Tue Sep 8 13:40:51 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36FE43C99F8 for ; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 13:40:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ronald-lists@klop.ws) Received: from smtp-relay-int.realworks.nl (smtp-relay-int.realworks.nl [194.109.157.24]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Bm5rd5cGrz3Wk4; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 13:40:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ronald-lists@klop.ws) Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2020 15:40:45 +0200 (CEST) From: Ronald Klop To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Cc: portmgr@freebsd.org Message-ID: <2128344036.116.1599572445531@localhost> In-Reply-To: <1268679721.21.1598955250524@localhost> References: <735767609.10.1597159067683@localhost> <504493339.1.1597829845980@localhost> <1268679721.21.1598955250524@localhost> Subject: Re: aarch64 pkg build seems broken/hanging MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Realworks (524.625.245ab8c58cb) Importance: Normal X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Bm5rd5cGrz3Wk4 X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of ronald-lists@klop.ws designates 194.109.157.24 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=ronald-lists@klop.ws X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.11 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_VERYGOOD(0.00)[194.109.157.24:from]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.92)[-0.925]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:194.109.157.0/24]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[klop.ws]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.99)[-0.994]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.39)[-0.391]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; HAS_X_PRIO_THREE(0.00)[3]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[194.109.157.24:from]; RCVD_COUNT_ZERO(0.00)[0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; ASN(0.00)[asn:3265, ipnet:194.109.0.0/16, country:NL]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-arm] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.33 X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2020 13:40:51 -0000 Hi, I'm trying to contact the portmgr's for a while because pkg building for aarch64 is not working. Any advise who to contact? http://thunderx1.nyi.freebsd.org/ seems down. And it would be nice to know the status of package building on arm64 before the ports for Q4 is branched. Regards, Ronald. Van: Ronald Klop Datum: dinsdag, 1 september 2020 12:14 Aan: portmgr@freebsd.org Onderwerp: Re: 11.3/aarch64 pkg build seems broken/hanging > > Hi, > > It is up and down with the aarch64 pkg build cluster. Is there a way to help? > I'm running FreeBSD since 2.1, I run jails, poudriere and experience with fileservers, datacenter, routing, etc. > > Regards, > Ronald. > > -- > https://wiki.freebsd.org/RonaldKlop > > > Van: Ronald Klop > Datum: woensdag, 19 augustus 2020 11:37 > Aan: Ronald Klop > CC: portmgr@freebsd.org > Onderwerp: Re: 11.3/aarch64 pkg build seems broken/hanging >> >> Hi, >> >> Somehow the angels fixed thunderx1 to not timeout anymore and a new build was started. >> >> http://thunderx1.nyi.freebsd.org/build.html?mastername=113arm64-quarterly&build=544756 >> >> But it is already stale for about 5 days now. >> >> Is there anything I can do to help? I'd love to help making aarch64 tier1. >> >> Regards, >> Ronald. >> >> >> Van: Ronald Klop >> Datum: zondag, 16 augustus 2020 16:19 >> Aan: ports@freebsd.org >> Onderwerp: Re: 11.3/aarch64 pkg build seems broken/hanging >>> >>> On Tue, 11 Aug 2020 17:17:47 +0200, Ronald Klop >>> wrote: >>> >>> > Hi, >>> > >>> > See: >>> > http://thunderx1.nyi.freebsd.org/build.html?mastername=113arm64-quarterly&build=544320 >>> > >>> > All current builds are from 10 aug or earlier and seem stuck. >>> >>> I saw that the build was restarted a few days ago. But now the URL gives a >>> timeout. >>> >>> > Does anybody know who to ping about this? Or what is going on? >>> >>> So, this question still stands. >>> NB: I would love invest some time into this and help running the build >>> machines. >>> >>> > >>> > Regards, >>> > Ronald. >>> > _______________________________________________ >>> > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list >>> > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports >>> > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>> _______________________________________________ >>> freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list >>> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>> >>> >>> >> > From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Tue Sep 8 14:23:50 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B993D3CAEA9 for ; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 14:23:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tech-lists@zyxst.net) Received: from wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Bm6pF5mg9z3Z4P for ; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 14:23:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tech-lists@zyxst.net) Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAA4EF11 for ; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 10:23:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 08 Sep 2020 10:23:47 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zyxst.net; h= date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=fm3; bh=CvX9uDa4GYwLSxVXBJO/CAD0lAG mumliA9Irpevr/QM=; b=f9oCppe2JTAWU+hdQV/7ifctNw/0Bu50kxXMkqtVG0t j5IaN9/KuaSEMHgqe+vRNJn73iD8C0jH1xknrSOntu2M9gcSmZrWq45e1ezw4s9x WD3G4x7TCQzEfUDIBmoy/ltYE/nFPHrAFzsGDtqSupB/VfI5RAEU34gtjixfm9qX /qJcyFnT3cFVE/o9OKR47lYMomwpp8r7eGZ+CTshRzb7W1tj5tRjGXf9hNHyhf1w qBNt+pBQKt7sriW1fvnRTpkQNF6byXKoimxDh42veNLi/Mp1QXLRJHR9kNFPsjAd GmZla2hmTRTIyCuSQUADz4r7DttayunqMVIjYqmzRsA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=CvX9uD a4GYwLSxVXBJO/CAD0lAGmumliA9Irpevr/QM=; b=leIICMYXLHOcVFkc65iXij Y3gkcTZAj2ls3iYtaq4/jTwdP2M0pOGwkneJGivJX0q4JxcihkPdiNDNK6fGsx51 YerhelL1w7YOir4jP1qjKFKtP2+2tdD8U+LRlH/lnb7sRwFikDx8ktVMROAWL3dS 7uwNo6QhP3XMJomIMgi7240yEf6g4VC8PBwGMR59MT9R6+zYxMRvk7eOxylkD9uR vylbRKnHklSmbQZaz3Ft7/OQDu1AaT19QL0+2AtMJp2HtN9FSwKfmKHzisLmd73Q d/F+iIQvhdMQNLvn51BGlKmRtPucK0T5m4VzI8FBa79DMhY3vHxk1umBMuyAjx3g == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduiedrudehfedgheelucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpeffhffvuffkfhggtggujgesghdtre ertddtvdenucfhrhhomhepthgvtghhqdhlihhsthhsuceothgvtghhqdhlihhsthhsseii hiigshhtrdhnvghtqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeejvddvveeltdetgedtiedvvdeuhf fgffeuheeffeffkeehudevheffjeelheetgeenucffohhmrghinheptghonhhfrdhlohgt rghlnecukfhppeekvddrjedtrdeluddrleelnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenuc frrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthgvtghhqdhlihhsthhsseiihiigshhtrdhnvght X-ME-Proxy: Received: from bastion.zyxst.net (bastion.zyxst.net [82.70.91.99]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id CD5D83064680 for ; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 10:23:46 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2020 15:23:18 +0100 From: tech-lists To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: rpi4 / will zfs work? Message-ID: <20200908142318.GE30073@bastion.zyxst.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org References: <20200904234219.GE80905@bastion.zyxst.net> <20200905105309.GF80905@bastion.zyxst.net> <20200907235739.GA30073@bastion.zyxst.net> <20200908123609.GC30073@bastion.zyxst.net> <20200908132603.GD30073@bastion.zyxst.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="lkTb+7nhmha7W+c3" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200908132603.GD30073@bastion.zyxst.net> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Bm6pF5mg9z3Z4P X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=zyxst.net header.s=fm3 header.b=f9oCppe2; dkim=pass header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm3 header.b=leIICMYX; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of tech-lists@zyxst.net designates 64.147.123.21 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=tech-lists@zyxst.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.21 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[zyxst.net:s=fm3,messagingengine.com:s=fm3]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[64.147.123.21:from]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:64.147.123.21]; MIME_GOOD(-0.20)[multipart/signed,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-arm@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.99)[-0.991]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[zyxst.net]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[zyxst.net:+,messagingengine.com:+]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.53)[-0.530]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.99)[-0.988]; SIGNED_PGP(-2.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:11403, ipnet:64.147.123.0/24, country:US]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-arm]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[64.147.123.21:from] X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2020 14:23:50 -0000 --lkTb+7nhmha7W+c3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 02:25:36PM +0100, tech-lists wrote: >managed to solve this by making > >zfs_enable=3D"YES" >zfsd_enable=3D"YES" > >the last two lines in /etc/rc.conf, meaning that guessing the problem was >usb3 loading later than zfs was correct. Maybe it's be an idea to put it in >rc.conf.local instead, hmm actually, that didn't fix it. What fixed it was a one-liner in cron @ reboot running zpool import. ensures it happens after usb3 has settled down. I'd be interested knowing the proper way to delay zfs until afer the usb3 h= as come up. --=20 J. --lkTb+7nhmha7W+c3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEE8n3tWhxW11Ccvv9/s8o7QhFzNAUFAl9Xk+gACgkQs8o7QhFz NAXdAg/7BZBTZL8dlPpvDiVSU7eLmP6x85tuzyX6meZtsQLdl60zBenDdywBsG9E /Ly8OcyhrPfUPLDZZbkw1yi/AEeNXhRdJ1/kSuzaa7ToHjWAdnCZasIQco1jrN8o u25DyAdTjWiAc8GrOrcSiEw9PbgVDsK7BayF5zrtVQAMKBcoVeVKSTWf+cXaQAvi 85QAwxlRcUOYiyssd3RYs1w81aWl727/mvBqMOazjhhY3vyjjHOMWvx5CGb+N2PR jYvfEQ5/t8qHvfnOoJGBQHqLfGpPxhhNz9Udr3xaNOqX8+pRKvr+RdvB6WSFdfoB ct2b4kBZubqyc/mMe0dYwgDHjPHsrA/dQIi3rkYVwrm+MjyE8QWKryotn7tCYjAa oz2AtOmRUQqiOuj4sLWRwAfukL9WUcz6SwzA8Sok6M3XIt9cOvW7zWWiFbyHxmqE 0K0Mshi4FziwbTemBRRevRBfEyIqkRpxTlfMyPtkBBYES65mPdpRix3IIg8VllGJ YGNKngB6P5lB6zXBFlDX1uCUpr7IXG/GhtG+wwfwTNOmGqy+mR8UVnNzWcx+rQ/y 2J3DOOezPONl3R5SRiXfAU2g4aRSJPOfbef8j2GL7KTFZhGkpXtSwmkIyuGKKN5Z 6r3ZZSxtaWcUMryuefQ+aqmiSm878Z6+p2gjxruEm1fEop8el6k= =w0vB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --lkTb+7nhmha7W+c3-- From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Tue Sep 8 14:53:23 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E14ED3CBFA3 for ; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 14:53:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net) Received: from mx1.sbone.de (mx1.sbone.de [IPv6:2a01:4f8:13b:39f::9f:25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx1.sbone.de", Issuer "SBone.DE" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Bm7SL616mz3c25 for ; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 14:53:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net) Received: from mail.sbone.de (mail.sbone.de [IPv6:fde9:577b:c1a9:31::2013:587]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.sbone.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2EC2F8D4A156; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 14:53:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from content-filter.sbone.de (content-filter.sbone.de [IPv6:fde9:577b:c1a9:31::2013:2742]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.sbone.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A961FE70828; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 14:53:19 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at sbone.de Received: from mail.sbone.de ([IPv6:fde9:577b:c1a9:31::2013:587]) by content-filter.sbone.de (content-filter.sbone.de [fde9:577b:c1a9:31::2013:2742]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tDLbl8b_LWy3; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 14:53:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (unknown [IPv6:fde9:577b:c1a9:4902:c9f0:b44d:bc76:2e61]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.sbone.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 59AF4E707AC; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 14:53:18 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" To: tech-lists Cc: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: rpi4 / will zfs work? Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2020 14:53:17 +0000 X-Mailer: MailMate (2.0BETAr6151) Message-ID: <79623802-9A77-4452-A13F-94E321BDE89C@lists.zabbadoz.net> In-Reply-To: <20200908142318.GE30073@bastion.zyxst.net> References: <20200904234219.GE80905@bastion.zyxst.net> <20200905105309.GF80905@bastion.zyxst.net> <20200907235739.GA30073@bastion.zyxst.net> <20200908123609.GC30073@bastion.zyxst.net> <20200908132603.GD30073@bastion.zyxst.net> <20200908142318.GE30073@bastion.zyxst.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Bm7SL616mz3c25 X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net designates 2a01:4f8:13b:39f::9f:25 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.81 / 15.00]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a01:4f8:13b:39f::9f:25]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.97)[-0.975]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[zabbadoz.net]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.55)[-0.554]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.98)[-0.978]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:2a01:4f8::/29, country:DE]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-arm] X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2020 14:53:23 -0000 On 8 Sep 2020, at 14:23, tech-lists wrote: > On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 02:25:36PM +0100, tech-lists wrote: >> managed to solve this by making >> >> zfs_enable="YES" >> zfsd_enable="YES" >> >> the last two lines in /etc/rc.conf, meaning that guessing the problem >> was >> usb3 loading later than zfs was correct. Maybe it's be an idea to put >> it in >> rc.conf.local instead, hmm > > actually, that didn't fix it. What fixed it was a one-liner in cron @ > reboot > running zpool import. ensures it happens after usb3 has settled down. > > I'd be interested knowing the proper way to delay zfs until afer the > usb3 has > come up. Does something like kern.cam.boot_delay=“30000" in loader.conf help? /bz From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Tue Sep 8 15:10:57 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C9133CC98E for ; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 15:10:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tech-lists@zyxst.net) Received: from wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Bm7rc4983z3cwB for ; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 15:10:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tech-lists@zyxst.net) Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id B460AFD2 for ; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 11:10:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 08 Sep 2020 11:10:54 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zyxst.net; h= date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=fm3; bh=IL1Ed7EOB6qsXOfBGxJ5Sk6OMGU 05Z5DiA9aP8FgpLo=; b=AhUMT0bENySHZ8OwHseFJjQCnTWwLkWiBB5pkZiAR+f ipr62fgut+efhU+lNLL57t0wpd+Ntd5PVMlV4mhf05Evbe9Ow0iBB+/wDi+H9Sem NRdnI4vm/+5AABRFo7TV9GhtZHHFXvB4U/W159lPyGGKQFMQd7UcLhDe5fR28CGM q7WBIfIWqscu9RzGrBFMSuDlI14Eg8nCS2sRqGStM08r+2X5JeMWDX9ONxrOFMyi MNUpA7Ku8fpT9QbhVm6t12NNueKluE7CJbtRVxpCNwBBbRkgJPlW7aLdvZeJDsla FM0FncxXfUBOABNVBj5QbXRu68Jxjf9lnUGBc5xM3iA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=IL1Ed7 EOB6qsXOfBGxJ5Sk6OMGU05Z5DiA9aP8FgpLo=; b=hWuHdizxOGDowzyR14Tslu ntY72hiZCUgwr1BmGbYUqB7q5eLCOLBQBpLdhrLpvPCHBx8Z7jniDWLK8nEtOhsY XlFrRvBRi/yU4lw22qGs7eHeS+wbcO0Xtl2TlDuivuaz38cvAwxgfvfCak1rj+hc IKcr9jomh3alFlUZmspAhFsL2AOP5oej0/BSOMc3696R0aVtQxAM9bSfbnFpXuea wgHIS/R3iTQvQ/SRWTE0Odf3mTyyPktnP6FGA9cDRb+gQcUAP5z1uSvTwP6y0JLw wVcAwtixjW3rF91nLcYkGLtXyj0F2fI0H8sArHJdEvdSEl7ymsaK2gAlzvAtwLiw == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduiedrudehfedgieelucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpeffhffvuffkfhggtggujgesghdtre ertddtjeenucfhrhhomhepthgvtghhqdhlihhsthhsuceothgvtghhqdhlihhsthhsseii hiigshhtrdhnvghtqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpedtteelkeeuvedthfeuleeiffeivd dvffdtleduteekffevueffledtledvveegueenucfkphepkedvrdejtddrledurdelleen ucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehtvggthh dqlhhishhtshesiiihgihsthdrnhgvth X-ME-Proxy: Received: from bastion.zyxst.net (bastion.zyxst.net [82.70.91.99]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id C16233064684 for ; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 11:10:53 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2020 16:10:25 +0100 From: tech-lists To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: rpi4 / will zfs work? Message-ID: <20200908151025.GF30073@bastion.zyxst.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org References: <20200904234219.GE80905@bastion.zyxst.net> <20200905105309.GF80905@bastion.zyxst.net> <20200907235739.GA30073@bastion.zyxst.net> <20200908123609.GC30073@bastion.zyxst.net> <20200908132603.GD30073@bastion.zyxst.net> <20200908142318.GE30073@bastion.zyxst.net> <79623802-9A77-4452-A13F-94E321BDE89C@lists.zabbadoz.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="JcvBIhDvR6w3jUPA" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <79623802-9A77-4452-A13F-94E321BDE89C@lists.zabbadoz.net> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Bm7rc4983z3cwB X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=zyxst.net header.s=fm3 header.b=AhUMT0bE; dkim=pass header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm3 header.b=hWuHdizx; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of tech-lists@zyxst.net designates 64.147.123.19 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=tech-lists@zyxst.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.93 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[zyxst.net:s=fm3,messagingengine.com:s=fm3]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.97)[-0.973]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_GOOD(0.00)[64.147.123.19:from]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:64.147.123.19:c]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.20)[multipart/signed,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-arm@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.99)[-0.992]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[zyxst.net]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[zyxst.net:+,messagingengine.com:+]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.27)[-0.269]; SIGNED_PGP(-2.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:11403, ipnet:64.147.123.0/24, country:US]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-arm]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[64.147.123.19:from] X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2020 15:10:57 -0000 --JcvBIhDvR6w3jUPA Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 02:52:50PM +0000, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: >Does something like kern.cam.boot_delay=3D=E2=80=9C30000" in loader.conf h= elp? I'll try it and report back. thanks, --=20 J. --JcvBIhDvR6w3jUPA Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEE8n3tWhxW11Ccvv9/s8o7QhFzNAUFAl9XnvMACgkQs8o7QhFz NAW2fhAAh84/wFr3MpmmKsxYHQ3vMqQfASwI2ocmTeRzwEAjFWaG3c6iXTeL3gcy 1o/tVSg1qnNpyMJRlwCRsOEYSMtJVGEXCzTNybAMBFOOeu8tJ/y7yZcqdBGFucHb iHJn9YdOfqazSWA9AF7NGo/F+lDesGuF2CNZBn2HKAJLg1mQ3K/+S+vE+zSsV06H 0Wp037vP20EYXLMu+OGgztZmdSJgxP2xE3z6X/AbHx74gxhP78aQon2Sw69ZAFjT DnngAjtg8clhjC70FtyQ6sMkyF3qYH97t6byiN9Vtl2/V0n4VhuJkQCn9frh7goI j00lyn4qMGSEITKDkprLw+q2/UEUbZFObUhdMXGIdbiQc8XdUCEz5YnkGjmKvbkV E9ou1KrNjqy433d8VmW+dWyLmxw6w0rDyS87VvLD1qkAcr3hDpbN30K6VnrMu49I Dpl2RJi3VyuxaWCtn7L1n4RIX8u9a5mtlZ8GWAvdPQKKtAnEWhtdafWjN/Ls0bXL 1x5+2aU2O42fyqSfJI0URDLa/hPDhYf91ugmbl3pNNL11/iX5dKV3b/GaHxH62fx xC3OM0Oh9XsI7RFubxBBq2FjlqU1BfOSdgLDtw70BKZmM8SQmgxEg47KPwhZFZrX b5E0171PuEadyyxMEQPylOqH9mg5Sm9wFv15Cv/PAH8/zONhNy8= =yUZ+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --JcvBIhDvR6w3jUPA-- From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Tue Sep 8 15:34:17 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6F1F3CCF37 for ; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 15:34:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tech-lists@zyxst.net) Received: from wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Bm8MY0PQPz3f6q for ; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 15:34:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tech-lists@zyxst.net) Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54F01FA4 for ; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 11:34:15 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 08 Sep 2020 11:34:15 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zyxst.net; h= date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=fm3; bh=t8TF7Ke1/CiUORr9f3Osqa6O4m6 P7K1Ly+niXvHiYWw=; b=kfcegrqNRFfgHnNxqADTDnUuz3qJq4stATyOKKc7BIY zNe9wGWnc6S7qte3ZRAIB63BYX8gYvBDxHsTny7EU4d/Qq+3ktI1RSQYDIG6Sfw7 LHYD0VOdCY8bVGRpboealweHd0/M0DQNmU8wPuK7RZjOqollfAOooE8xaZR4K4Ux oLqDckeeSQqIZb+LhtHZmjlqqwGIzEo2dgbfKTaF5UsgIuX1wtRxZRGDdksV0X0i dRYMYCu4dP6mUP0FLEvBwczbKrdoQg7YDxt3dhKv7C1etb67m6erxtC2pQS2DJbl PsB8VExgPegwzP2N6lknix3lP1ugMfywK9XZgunhNhQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=t8TF7K e1/CiUORr9f3Osqa6O4m6P7K1Ly+niXvHiYWw=; b=lt0RanenPb+5UIzPIhlSRo vTZLqa89ENTfAjKWcmJp8ZkDTvOLJAyjwVGeIO/Q+CK0ePtPWdnflhnCBgpxJXde lJdxf84SiqOaiwthkg2hT1ryI34Mu8o0hlggr5rkraAmG5E8HLBntMveJjl1LeAs do/WBI20HazQkJIuujK6tM13ArUiJ0YwPICLPmUb4PTD5BCOLSYV7EEWWQzzdE6S BmjZDbZNAvHxSuPljKxeL5LcJkt8hxHn32tX82p6qg9/ITlO2nSiI07nxTuy+tWD sO41y/HNBFO8F4HQWMEPNhpm/52Y8fA41luWXtSWAgOg3fd1gPHaCqWk5yNIro1Q == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduiedrudehfedgjeegucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpeffhffvuffkfhggtggujgesghdtre ertddtjeenucfhrhhomhepthgvtghhqdhlihhsthhsuceothgvtghhqdhlihhsthhsseii hiigshhtrdhnvghtqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpedtteelkeeuvedthfeuleeiffeivd dvffdtleduteekffevueffledtledvveegueenucfkphepkedvrdejtddrledurdelleen ucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehtvggthh dqlhhishhtshesiiihgihsthdrnhgvth X-ME-Proxy: Received: from bastion.zyxst.net (bastion.zyxst.net [82.70.91.99]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 51E7D3280060 for ; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 11:34:14 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2020 16:33:45 +0100 From: tech-lists To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: rpi4 / will zfs work? Message-ID: <20200908153345.GG30073@bastion.zyxst.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org References: <20200904234219.GE80905@bastion.zyxst.net> <20200905105309.GF80905@bastion.zyxst.net> <20200907235739.GA30073@bastion.zyxst.net> <20200908123609.GC30073@bastion.zyxst.net> <20200908132603.GD30073@bastion.zyxst.net> <20200908142318.GE30073@bastion.zyxst.net> <79623802-9A77-4452-A13F-94E321BDE89C@lists.zabbadoz.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="pE2VAHO2njSJCslu" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <79623802-9A77-4452-A13F-94E321BDE89C@lists.zabbadoz.net> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Bm8MY0PQPz3f6q X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=zyxst.net header.s=fm3 header.b=kfcegrqN; dkim=pass header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm3 header.b=lt0Ranen; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of tech-lists@zyxst.net designates 64.147.123.19 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=tech-lists@zyxst.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.85 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[zyxst.net:s=fm3,messagingengine.com:s=fm3]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.97)[-0.973]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_GOOD(0.00)[64.147.123.19:from]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:64.147.123.19]; MIME_GOOD(-0.20)[multipart/signed,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-arm@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.99)[-0.993]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[zyxst.net]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[zyxst.net:+,messagingengine.com:+]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.19)[-1.188]; SIGNED_PGP(-2.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:11403, ipnet:64.147.123.0/24, country:US]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-arm]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[64.147.123.19:from] X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2020 15:34:17 -0000 --pE2VAHO2njSJCslu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 02:52:50PM +0000, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: >Does something like kern.cam.boot_delay=3D=E2=80=9C30000" in loader.conf h= elp? No. Also tried with other values. By default it's 0, so tried 10000, 30000 = and 60000, same result. I'm out of ideas apart from the @reboot thing which wor= ks. --=20 J. --pE2VAHO2njSJCslu Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEE8n3tWhxW11Ccvv9/s8o7QhFzNAUFAl9XpGwACgkQs8o7QhFz NAVsAQ/9EUlMDrFzGG/BWpLmkECDbHsbZpr07NlYsQOnONqGiY0lJHrH0GZp4kRB cpNsKpV+wdJhKlXkN3eRK/fPHQt7cg0S131DAiXEWlzmxJYQ1btC9u+1SY9c3Dhm uKKMDlLqoPMPXTqJYaBSeZWgUEjqshYa1mk5RdEsJH6DPaBQo3puWribDyeNoOAE XOxAHWipdKFB1o0kk3rLblbD75Yg9T9y47tzN7Ua4qyCE6IfCQ/pYXYen0l8I38v 1sH3DRZo18y/a77Z+mdriTG6YAwqolUN8VImBxYRxC0Sh3fbdJAoSGurdk3RbUl6 wvwPGG8QUwVHH6hKWwF3YZjlrwd6gmZj7/GfXZzSzTi7sGY2PM6N0rOngxF1E0JZ l7H421BZ4iLNEoXRcdCAOGXnBqr46OP2IoPw4nHeopKSpYAP8XOyIgjTUQrlzJNM J7Q1SIqcGdqKXifZR/trAi7xU6/+U+kJ8buglvp5bDCp2sESM6EaORoiyuxLdEVA yP6RrgjiFYEjpnxcL2hlwBzDOxMLm4Xw7rjn1xrKR//Ent9RuQIO2nPxkVT6hsVT YGERmF4/kNp4ITADW+gdK/3syu2S83DRfGfYMsQ4IdG2DGI0t676WriSyzwZWGWt ALmW/Wl8oLSggr6U09stEu0ffBFKRaucZQ66l/bROPefz48+w1k= =GghI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --pE2VAHO2njSJCslu-- From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Tue Sep 8 20:32:54 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1C373D68F4 for ; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 20:32:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from agapon@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lj1-f196.google.com (mail-lj1-f196.google.com [209.85.208.196]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BmH056VP5z4QZr for ; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 20:32:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from agapon@gmail.com) Received: by mail-lj1-f196.google.com with SMTP id k25so647422ljk.0 for ; Tue, 08 Sep 2020 13:32:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:openpgp:autocrypt :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=24MVCo63ZjH3rfytKWC+T2wsgdArnUhhp3FDw0F8UmU=; b=Nl2tv/F3gj7hSv/2ludBGNNzEo0FeeTlgZQCHHd8ewfYUTOZFBjW9Dusx2HoKi063j 9p2QjiBiDI4ipNfcvq+c5T0u99V2UAnWJ8ErG2aMXDtKITwIyZU6Nt1t5KHn1/ip818n 1zZHZEroMfLQnzfKv5fzVwKTHsr0kVkYAG1c2Kuv3HQaDPaCyQeyQBOhOAm24c2KoXdD eP0xu+lgGBmychzoxIRtvIi8XLMXc6q/yE6SeiXgInnMa06djV3lim6lpexhdThEb4K9 Lhsjb0s2sKvYlB+BAydSGY65691sYjJ9Fte7778d926eMCsFh17YVDZDfrvhlvRbFTsf P++w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM53205yYwaMG0Nsnu/FqctMnwiMrtKJdmT9q9Q1boIUFa7DBwvWuR yYl4AT1XU7E64Wtjigzf2H2X+NFO3Mw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzAWv+nmMx56rPBVF0uFbymVJOYO+169q1nDggUxPZc8bndUzDAa0VIAkPGc/YKkLJZxwVEbw== X-Received: by 2002:a2e:3a10:: with SMTP id h16mr131747lja.193.1599597171740; Tue, 08 Sep 2020 13:32:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.88] (east.meadow.volia.net. [93.72.151.96]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id i12sm129975lfi.48.2020.09.08.13.32.50 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 08 Sep 2020 13:32:51 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: rpi4 / will zfs work? To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org References: <20200904234219.GE80905@bastion.zyxst.net> <20200905105309.GF80905@bastion.zyxst.net> <20200907235739.GA30073@bastion.zyxst.net> <20200908123609.GC30073@bastion.zyxst.net> <20200908132603.GD30073@bastion.zyxst.net> <20200908142318.GE30073@bastion.zyxst.net> <79623802-9A77-4452-A13F-94E321BDE89C@lists.zabbadoz.net> <20200908153345.GG30073@bastion.zyxst.net> From: Andriy Gapon Openpgp: preference=signencrypt Autocrypt: addr=avg@FreeBSD.org; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= mQINBFm4LIgBEADNB/3lT7f15UKeQ52xCFQx/GqHkSxEdVyLFZTmY3KyNPQGBtyvVyBfprJ7 mAeXZWfhat6cKNRAGZcL5EmewdQuUfQfBdYmKjbw3a9GFDsDNuhDA2QwFt8BmkiVMRYyvI7l N0eVzszWCUgdc3qqM6qqcgBaqsVmJluwpvwp4ZBXmch5BgDDDb1MPO8AZ2QZfIQmplkj8Y6Z AiNMknkmgaekIINSJX8IzRzKD5WwMsin70psE8dpL/iBsA2cpJGzWMObVTtCxeDKlBCNqM1i gTXta1ukdUT7JgLEFZk9ceYQQMJJtUwzWu1UHfZn0Fs29HTqawfWPSZVbulbrnu5q55R4PlQ /xURkWQUTyDpqUvb4JK371zhepXiXDwrrpnyyZABm3SFLkk2bHlheeKU6Yql4pcmSVym1AS4 dV8y0oHAfdlSCF6tpOPf2+K9nW1CFA8b/tw4oJBTtfZ1kxXOMdyZU5fiG7xb1qDgpQKgHUX8 7Rd2T1UVLVeuhYlXNw2F+a2ucY+cMoqz3LtpksUiBppJhw099gEXehcN2JbUZ2TueJdt1FdS ztnZmsHUXLxrRBtGwqnFL7GSd6snpGIKuuL305iaOGODbb9c7ne1JqBbkw1wh8ci6vvwGlzx rexzimRaBzJxlkjNfMx8WpCvYebGMydNoeEtkWldtjTNVsUAtQARAQABtB5BbmRyaXkgR2Fw b24gPGF2Z0BGcmVlQlNELm9yZz6JAlQEEwEIAD4WIQS+LEO7ngQnXA4Bjr538m7TUc1yjwUC WbgsiAIbIwUJBaOagAULCQgHAgYVCAkKCwIEFgIDAQIeAQIXgAAKCRB38m7TUc1yj+JAEACV l9AK/nOWAt/9cufV2fRj0hdOqB1aCshtSrwHk/exXsDa4/FkmegxXQGY+3GWX3deIyesbVRL rYdtdK0dqJyT1SBqXK1h3/at9rxr9GQA6KWOxTjUFURsU7ok/6SIlm8uLRPNKO+yq0GDjgaO LzN+xykuBA0FlhQAXJnpZLcVfPJdWv7sSHGedL5ln8P8rxR+XnmsA5TUaaPcbhTB+mG+iKFj GghASDSfGqLWFPBlX/fpXikBDZ1gvOr8nyMY9nXhgfXpq3B6QCRYKPy58ChrZ5weeJZ29b7/ QdEO8NFNWHjSD9meiLdWQaqo9Y7uUxN3wySc/YUZxtS0bhAd8zJdNPsJYG8sXgKjeBQMVGuT eCAJFEYJqbwWvIXMfVWop4+O4xB+z2YE3jAbG/9tB/GSnQdVSj3G8MS80iLS58frnt+RSEw/ psahrfh0dh6SFHttE049xYiC+cM8J27Aaf0i9RflyITq57NuJm+AHJoU9SQUkIF0nc6lfA+o JRiyRlHZHKoRQkIg4aiKaZSWjQYRl5Txl0IZUP1dSWMX4s3XTMurC/pnja45dge/4ESOtJ9R 8XuIWg45Oq6MeIWdjKddGhRj3OohsltKgkEU3eLKYtB6qRTQypHHUawCXz88uYt5e3w4V16H lCpSTZV/EVHnNe45FVBlvK7k7HFfDDkryLkCDQRZuCyIARAAlq0slcsVboY/+IUJdcbEiJRW be9HKVz4SUchq0z9MZPX/0dcnvz/gkyYA+OuM78dNS7Mbby5dTvOqfpLJfCuhaNYOhlE0wY+ 1T6Tf1f4c/uA3U/YiadukQ3+6TJuYGAdRZD5EqYFIkreARTVWg87N9g0fT9BEqLw9lJtEGDY EWUE7L++B8o4uu3LQFEYxcrb4K/WKmgtmFcm77s0IKDrfcX4doV92QTIpLiRxcOmCC/OCYuO jB1oaaqXQzZrCutXRK0L5XN1Y1PYjIrEzHMIXmCDlLYnpFkK+itlXwlE2ZQxkfMruCWdQXye syl2fynAe8hvp7Mms9qU2r2K9EcJiR5N1t1C2/kTKNUhcRv7Yd/vwusK7BqJbhlng5ZgRx0m WxdntU/JLEntz3QBsBsWM9Y9wf2V4tLv6/DuDBta781RsCB/UrU2zNuOEkSixlUiHxw1dccI 6CVlaWkkJBxmHX22GdDFrcjvwMNIbbyfQLuBq6IOh8nvu9vuItup7qemDG3Ms6TVwA7BD3j+ 3fGprtyW8Fd/RR2bW2+LWkMrqHffAr6Y6V3h5kd2G9Q8ZWpEJk+LG6Mk3fhZhmCnHhDu6CwN MeUvxXDVO+fqc3JjFm5OxhmfVeJKrbCEUJyM8ESWLoNHLqjywdZga4Q7P12g8DUQ1mRxYg/L HgZY3zfKOqcAEQEAAYkCPAQYAQgAJhYhBL4sQ7ueBCdcDgGOvnfybtNRzXKPBQJZuCyIAhsM BQkFo5qAAAoJEHfybtNRzXKPBVwQAKfFy9P7N3OsLDMB56A4Kf+ZT+d5cIx0Yiaf4n6w7m3i ImHHHk9FIetI4Xe54a2IXh4Bq5UkAGY0667eIs+Z1Ea6I2i27Sdo7DxGwq09Qnm/Y65ADvXs 3aBvokCcm7FsM1wky395m8xUos1681oV5oxgqeRI8/76qy0hD9WR65UW+HQgZRIcIjSel9vR XDaD2HLGPTTGr7u4v00UeTMs6qvPsa2PJagogrKY8RXdFtXvweQFz78NbXhluwix2Tb9ETPk LIpDrtzV73CaE2aqBG/KrboXT2C67BgFtnk7T7Y7iKq4/XvEdDWscz2wws91BOXuMMd4c/c4 OmGW9m3RBLufFrOag1q5yUS9QbFfyqL6dftJP3Zq/xe+mr7sbWbhPVCQFrH3r26mpmy841ym dwQnNcsbIGiBASBSKksOvIDYKa2Wy8htPmWFTEOPRpFXdGQ27awcjjnB42nngyCK5ukZDHi6 w0qK5DNQQCkiweevCIC6wc3p67jl1EMFY5+z+zdTPb3h7LeVnGqW0qBQl99vVFgzLxchKcl0 R/paSFgwqXCZhAKMuUHncJuynDOP7z5LirUeFI8qsBAJi1rXpQoLJTVcW72swZ42IdPiboqx NbTMiNOiE36GqMcTPfKylCbF45JNX4nF9ElM0E+Y8gi4cizJYBRr2FBJgay0b9Cp Message-ID: Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2020 23:32:49 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/60.0 Thunderbird/60.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200908153345.GG30073@bastion.zyxst.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BmH056VP5z4QZr X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of agapon@gmail.com designates 209.85.208.196 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=agapon@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.64 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:209.85.128.0/17]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.48)[-0.478]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[avg@FreeBSD.org,agapon@gmail.com]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[93.72.151.96:received]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:209.85.128.0/17, country:US]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[avg@FreeBSD.org,agapon@gmail.com]; TO_DOM_EQ_FROM_DOM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.13)[-0.126]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-arm@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[FreeBSD.org]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.25)[0.246]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[209.85.208.196:from]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[209.85.208.196:from]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-arm] X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2020 20:32:54 -0000 On 08/09/2020 18:33, tech-lists wrote: > On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 02:52:50PM +0000, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: > >> Does something like kern.cam.boot_delay=“30000" in loader.conf help? > > No. Also tried with other values. By default it's 0, so tried 10000, 30000 and > 60000, same result. I'm out of ideas apart from the @reboot thing which works. Have you read UPDATING ? Is your rc.d up to date ? -- Andriy Gapon From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Wed Sep 9 01:56:29 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EECB3DFD31 for ; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 01:56:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tech-lists@zyxst.net) Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com (out2-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BmQ9S3fp3z4myn for ; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 01:56:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tech-lists@zyxst.net) Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C07F5C0117 for ; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 21:56:27 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 08 Sep 2020 21:56:27 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zyxst.net; h= date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=fm3; bh=BsHu1iaXgfG5bJhW1d2j/pYcpZS cpeXu1iHd8u1OriU=; b=erEP49m9bcwlsG4yC7DEn7SqK1GtgmAIP76dnCL8hl1 r3mwWbVx/lWId51wi5YutkU7/6k0dLJ1GxjHxNqD/pRoyz5/HZ1JdkJSY9D2Scrf HZkyTRZAqzgBdmjsCK1kUFg96nZlCxXk/1cWWqIfUbCd97WbNRyLluUoFfTYn32V 2C1HUwENOEIOmMPW1RHWET174IWTvlvDIFns1AeO9oG4NouPQpD6X1NhvfKheq+p lukaiBn+RgdxEYzOfvxqnpPs9H08Rq5okmM5aihSZH90JVow1jerB3/upTitpEw2 VR0Xn6YfnaEv9t5U8IKVWrW4zNgfQ+rUJw3zlVA0fQA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=BsHu1i aXgfG5bJhW1d2j/pYcpZScpeXu1iHd8u1OriU=; b=Mbcg4f2fTOln1iBPXRMMb/ sdRGQjRS5Z53K031fnQJ3hr2vB2Gc2Sx6ttNrW78AUxTECe7t2X0Qjt/4HsNUM8o MhUCWdb2JJfDFc8HaAP4JzakZvlhxQ1GDIcKY3cNtrD/OuR8CAnW5XreU29QMbQD PbaDOsFxpVbxJLZXrC/AIBxUoOMUaI+rS11gRCNlg66O/UWW1njv3ktYbBgkVu3R 86oKoLJvMpbR3p+G0ZTKIGtZDwNiSzZuKUK6wQ5RJFFCLffNxVHNYHDf3k4DjgiZ a4OIayQddsKeKdzD4dmpH0grYy4WuDbDskihcOopyPBY6h7u3uryZC7wTEIXIqRA == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduiedrudehgedgheegucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpeffhffvuffkfhggtggujgesghdtre ertddtvdenucfhrhhomhepthgvtghhqdhlihhsthhsuceothgvtghhqdhlihhsthhsseii hiigshhtrdhnvghtqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpedtheeigfdvudefkeekvddtfedvte dttdekuddvgeevlefftdekffdujedvhfduteenucfkphepkedvrdejtddrledurdelleen ucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehtvggthh dqlhhishhtshesiiihgihsthdrnhgvth X-ME-Proxy: Received: from bastion.zyxst.net (bastion.zyxst.net [82.70.91.99]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id E11BD3064683 for ; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 21:56:26 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2020 02:55:58 +0100 From: tech-lists To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: rpi4 / will zfs work? Message-ID: <20200909015558.GH30073@bastion.zyxst.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org References: <20200904234219.GE80905@bastion.zyxst.net> <20200905105309.GF80905@bastion.zyxst.net> <20200907235739.GA30073@bastion.zyxst.net> <20200908123609.GC30073@bastion.zyxst.net> <20200908132603.GD30073@bastion.zyxst.net> <20200908142318.GE30073@bastion.zyxst.net> <79623802-9A77-4452-A13F-94E321BDE89C@lists.zabbadoz.net> <20200908153345.GG30073@bastion.zyxst.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="LiQwW4YX+w4axhAx" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BmQ9S3fp3z4myn X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=zyxst.net header.s=fm3 header.b=erEP49m9; dkim=pass header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm3 header.b=Mbcg4f2f; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of tech-lists@zyxst.net designates 66.111.4.26 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=tech-lists@zyxst.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.47 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[zyxst.net:s=fm3,messagingengine.com:s=fm3]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.94)[-0.943]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_GOOD(0.00)[66.111.4.26:from]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:66.111.4.26]; MIME_GOOD(-0.20)[multipart/signed,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-arm@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.99)[-0.993]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[zyxst.net]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[zyxst.net:+,messagingengine.com:+]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.83)[-0.833]; SIGNED_PGP(-2.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:11403, ipnet:66.111.4.0/24, country:US]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-arm]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[66.111.4.26:from] X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2020 01:56:29 -0000 --LiQwW4YX+w4axhAx Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 11:32:22PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote: >Have you read UPDATING ? >Is your rc.d up to date ? aha no I haven't, thanks for pointing that out. I haven't run -current in a long while. trust me to zfs a tier2 arch while zfs is in flux. TBH i'm pleasantly surprised freebsd works with the rpi4. I'm very happy that zfs works at all= !=20 --=20 J. --LiQwW4YX+w4axhAx Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEE8n3tWhxW11Ccvv9/s8o7QhFzNAUFAl9YNjQACgkQs8o7QhFz NAV18g/9FFmDaBXRcLaiB5Ny7T7wOCECK4rFWrktuOL69bVt49VvpNTObURt0cTZ vXawfJwo4yROszihVL2ewRHO1IfbeELWzfFHPwHRL2+kd76X/PDTebL9z9I2ZJbt THdAnEC+sSHAXjEJbQvb/SZ2mmjXHZyUl6mMD8ju4s5LChYzG48JueHwo2b81z9s 69HcjaQKgGA4Yi8H1UpgFkLD3YBNN+yZKZG7JGakPvRTEe2M5O0nDbEuf+rs0W8v dlfKoLrg5GrF14RWSoj/bHkew/M9cByEHM8Ijw6YM0L0t9FpZ1D7Zs2n6UP4wWjw yjue0M6H7OU46B3ffLMy0xMR8/O8rMXT1DHFEaQMpDGH/4sUow408I5Oru79K3xy YOG1ivXJqM6bQ3B7OBVVQON/AtG5gnuPdNMtGlG+F11Itovczum/Cwkp1FWlKk+O N0MTYtkhCTHhpWlATCU4oolJXQ4XxYf+nM36ELMIjUdGHRUPcW8TGZUsk96Jx3Eq rcnxQIlMJmjzbDZrm2Jp5xEcriPTPsotHdtAFFVWGvJb4anT7ogW4t4jshZBVwyQ EKsAh/45he87MOnRH8z6an2jorVvQdESXIrlmNx84EZhcuGwUDZqa6xbNMXDU0qs YFUt2YcnTZJn8fVu+Pra0aQ27JnFS83UygeN7/3dM/IgOPWh3sY= =Xf8x -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --LiQwW4YX+w4axhAx-- From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Wed Sep 9 12:58:55 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B0F13D0307 for ; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 12:58:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from swills@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mouf.net (mouf.net [IPv6:2607:fc50:0:4400:216:3eff:fe69:33b3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mouf.net", Issuer "mouf.net" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Bmhsp4x6rz4DVs; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 12:58:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from swills@FreeBSD.org) Received: from lrrr.mouf.net (cpe-76-182-16-135.nc.res.rr.com [76.182.16.135]) (authenticated bits=0) by mouf.net (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id 089CwfAM067803 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Wed, 9 Sep 2020 12:58:46 GMT (envelope-from swills@FreeBSD.org) Subject: Re: aarch64 pkg build seems broken/hanging To: Ronald Klop , freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Cc: portmgr@freebsd.org, Cluster Administrators References: <735767609.10.1597159067683@localhost> <504493339.1.1597829845980@localhost> <1268679721.21.1598955250524@localhost> <2128344036.116.1599572445531@localhost> From: Steve Wills Message-ID: <93ab93ce-8887-315e-c775-0929c716032a@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2020 08:58:37 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <2128344036.116.1599572445531@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (mouf.net [199.48.129.64]); Wed, 09 Sep 2020 12:58:49 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=4.5 tests=KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS, NICE_REPLY_A autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on mouf.net X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.99.2 at mouf.net X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Bmhsp4x6rz4DVs X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.00 / 15.00]; local_wl_from(0.00)[FreeBSD.org]; ASN(0.00)[asn:36236, ipnet:2607:fc50::/36, country:US] X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2020 12:58:55 -0000 Hi, Sorry, but this is not a portmgr@ issue, this is a clusteradm@ issue. Steve On 9/8/20 9:40 AM, Ronald Klop wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to contact the portmgr's for a while because pkg building for > aarch64 is not working. > Any advise who to contact? > > http://thunderx1.nyi.freebsd.org/ seems down. And it would be nice to > know the status of package building on arm64 before the ports for Q4 is > branched. > > Regards, > Ronald. > > *Van:* Ronald Klop > *Datum:* dinsdag, 1 september 2020 12:14 > *Aan:* portmgr@freebsd.org > *Onderwerp:* Re: 11.3/aarch64 pkg build seems broken/hanging > > Hi, > > It is up and down with the aarch64 pkg build cluster. Is there a way > to help? > I'm running FreeBSD since 2.1, I run jails, poudriere and experience > with fileservers, datacenter, routing, etc. > > Regards, > Ronald. > > -- > https://wiki.freebsd.org/RonaldKlop > > *Van:* Ronald Klop > *Datum:* woensdag, 19 augustus 2020 11:37 > *Aan:* Ronald Klop > *CC:* portmgr@freebsd.org > *Onderwerp:* Re: 11.3/aarch64 pkg build seems broken/hanging > > Hi, > > Somehow the angels fixed thunderx1 to not timeout anymore and a > new build was started. > > http://thunderx1.nyi.freebsd.org/build.html?mastername=113arm64-quarterly&build=544756 > > But it is already stale for about 5 days now. > > Is there anything I can do to help? I'd love to help making > aarch64 tier1. > > Regards, > Ronald. > > *Van:* Ronald Klop > *Datum:* zondag, 16 augustus 2020 16:19 > *Aan:* ports@freebsd.org > *Onderwerp:* Re: 11.3/aarch64 pkg build seems broken/hanging > > On Tue, 11 Aug 2020 17:17:47 +0200, Ronald Klop > > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > See: > > > http://thunderx1.nyi.freebsd.org/build.html?mastername=113arm64-quarterly&build=544320 > > > > All current builds are from 10 aug or earlier and seem stuck. > > I saw that the build was restarted a few days ago. But now > the URL gives a > timeout. > > > Does anybody know who to ping about this? Or what is > going on? > > So, this question still stands. > NB: I would love invest some time into this and help running > the build > machines. > > > > > Regards, > > Ronald. > >  _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Thu Sep 10 16:24:51 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A25993DBE3B for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 16:24:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd@www.zefox.net) Received: from www.zefox.net (www.zefox.net [50.1.20.27]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "www.zefox.com", Issuer "www.zefox.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BnPNy31X3z4Fx2; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 16:24:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd@www.zefox.net) Received: from www.zefox.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by www.zefox.net (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 08AGOrxT005555 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 10 Sep 2020 09:24:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fbsd@www.zefox.net) Received: (from fbsd@localhost) by www.zefox.net (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 08AGOr8f005554; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 09:24:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fbsd) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 09:24:52 -0700 From: bob prohaska To: Andriy Gapon Cc: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" , freebsd-arm@freebsd.org, bob prohaska Subject: Re: MMCCAM - Re: onboard wireless on rpi4 Message-ID: <20200910162452.GA5528@www.zefox.net> References: <20200904134619.GB80905@bastion.zyxst.net> <69934262-D9D3-4986-849D-9E8221D1E387@kronometrix.org> <1677459627.55.1599232125847@localhost> <75E08DC2-D229-45AA-85AE-CCF06FD0B490@kronometrix.org> <09959D86-E3E3-43E9-8134-C2FC73343DBA@lists.zabbadoz.net> <507782579.41.1599484468967@localhost> <20200907152118.GA89696@www.zefox.net> <40D76B81-934B-43A4-B269-E075D2F4B4CD@lists.zabbadoz.net> <98fb91a8-00e3-4b5c-3b0f-efa2c51388bc@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <98fb91a8-00e3-4b5c-3b0f-efa2c51388bc@FreeBSD.org> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BnPNy31X3z4Fx2 X-Spamd-Bar: + Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of fbsd@www.zefox.net has no SPF policy when checking 50.1.20.27) smtp.mailfrom=fbsd@www.zefox.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [1.82 / 15.00]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; WWW_DOT_DOMAIN(0.50)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.03)[-0.030]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[zefox.net]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.49)[0.492]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.54)[-0.539]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7065, ipnet:50.1.16.0/20, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-arm]; MID_RHS_WWW(0.50)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 16:24:51 -0000 On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 09:59:36AM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote: > > Bob, I noticed this: > (sdda0:sdhci_slot0:0:0:0): Partition 0 -> 8265462 > > Perhaps r365445 might be of some help. > Indeed, moving up to r365459 results in a kernel that boots to multi-user. There does seems to be a lot of chatter about sdda0: SDHC ED4QT 3.0 SN 9B9A5304 MFG 05/2018 by 27 SM (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): daclose (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): daopen (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): daclose ..... It seems harmless, but certainly looks odd. The complete console output is at sdda0: SDHC ED4QT 3.0 SN 9B9A5304 MFG 05/2018 by 27 SM Thanks for reading! bob prohaska From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Thu Sep 10 16:28:47 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6C093DC58A for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 16:28:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd@www.zefox.net) Received: from www.zefox.net (www.zefox.net [50.1.20.27]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "www.zefox.com", Issuer "www.zefox.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BnPTV67QCz4GBt; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 16:28:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd@www.zefox.net) Received: from www.zefox.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by www.zefox.net (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 08AGSvi2005571 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 10 Sep 2020 09:28:57 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fbsd@www.zefox.net) Received: (from fbsd@localhost) by www.zefox.net (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 08AGSv6Q005570; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 09:28:57 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fbsd) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 09:28:56 -0700 From: bob prohaska To: Andriy Gapon Cc: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" , freebsd-arm@freebsd.org, bob prohaska Subject: Re: MMCCAM - Re: onboard wireless on rpi4 Message-ID: <20200910162856.GB5528@www.zefox.net> References: <69934262-D9D3-4986-849D-9E8221D1E387@kronometrix.org> <1677459627.55.1599232125847@localhost> <75E08DC2-D229-45AA-85AE-CCF06FD0B490@kronometrix.org> <09959D86-E3E3-43E9-8134-C2FC73343DBA@lists.zabbadoz.net> <507782579.41.1599484468967@localhost> <20200907152118.GA89696@www.zefox.net> <40D76B81-934B-43A4-B269-E075D2F4B4CD@lists.zabbadoz.net> <98fb91a8-00e3-4b5c-3b0f-efa2c51388bc@FreeBSD.org> <20200910162452.GA5528@www.zefox.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200910162452.GA5528@www.zefox.net> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BnPTV67QCz4GBt X-Spamd-Bar: + Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of fbsd@www.zefox.net has no SPF policy when checking 50.1.20.27) smtp.mailfrom=fbsd@www.zefox.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [1.21 / 15.00]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; WWW_DOT_DOMAIN(0.50)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.34)[-0.341]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[zefox.net]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.44)[0.441]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.79)[-0.786]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7065, ipnet:50.1.16.0/20, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-arm]; MID_RHS_WWW(0.50)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 16:28:47 -0000 Typo correction: The console output is at http://www.zefox.net/~fbsd/rpi3/GENERIC-MMCCAM/console.r365459 Apologies for the noise! bob prohaska On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 09:24:52AM -0700, bob prohaska wrote: > On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 09:59:36AM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote: > > > > Bob, I noticed this: > > (sdda0:sdhci_slot0:0:0:0): Partition 0 -> 8265462 > > > > Perhaps r365445 might be of some help. > > > > Indeed, moving up to r365459 results in a kernel that boots > to multi-user. There does seems to be a lot of chatter about > > sdda0: SDHC ED4QT 3.0 SN 9B9A5304 MFG 05/2018 by 27 SM > (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): daclose > (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): daopen > (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): daclose > ..... > It seems harmless, but certainly looks odd. > > The complete console output is at > sdda0: SDHC ED4QT 3.0 SN 9B9A5304 MFG 05/2018 by 27 SM > > Thanks for reading! > > bob prohaska > From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Thu Sep 10 17:11:35 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06FA63DE521 for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 17:11:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jeditekunum@gmail.com) Received: from a2i642.smtp2go.com (a2i642.smtp2go.com [103.47.206.130]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BnQQt45vhz4LN5 for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 17:11:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jeditekunum@gmail.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=smtpservice.net; s=m4fue0.a1-4.dyn; x=1599758794; h=Feedback-ID: X-Smtpcorp-Track:To:Date:Message-Id:Subject:From:Reply-To:Sender: List-Unsubscribe; bh=zrgcrREgkbKzOH2CTk3JldMaacUmSylT4ysa6DDEtOM=; b=cOLpBpzk wmuRbx0nyoJEdE2fLYIgRz7TTucycc7HZsOAt7+h0t2a0PNgzexcBiqUoVXE9cQShIcVki49s8JYV dIHa/ag0aYDqmFQ4A+MpuPHnvdh/5y+UVr903FNuMRHEmiFxlmELrRL4zyj2SyP7QqpA8CjAUXHJY Z5sPXBiFh4MM8QunrvQEy3TWMlO7+RH486BsdGResFiFYkd5hekPfBWxtt0iM7EM9+Oeo6fbYZp92 nMj/2Az77h1w/kIpi+P6+HjloQa088OGk1HslTU7TcJD77fHLh3Kq9PSpOL6fsLQr7YwuDd4xEP1o xY44pW02fgfdAQswGyfOJvWgUw==; Received: from [10.66.228.43] (helo=SmtpCorp) by smtpcorp.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92-S2G) (envelope-from ) id 1kGQ6f-ED4v1v-En for freebsd-arm@freebsd.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 17:11:33 +0000 Received: from [10.162.213.37] (helo=takodana.opaxus.net) by smtpcorp.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92-S2G) (envelope-from ) id 1kGQ6f-wSET8k-0h for freebsd-arm@freebsd.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 17:11:33 +0000 Received: from batuu.opaxus.net (65-128-220-140.mpls.qwest.net [65.128.220.140]) by takodana.opaxus.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8A4F52CCAC for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 12:11:32 -0500 (CDT) From: Jedi Tek'Unum Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.1\)) Subject: Giant Board? Message-Id: Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 12:11:31 -0500 To: freebsd-arm X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.1) X-Smtpcorp-Track: 1kGQ6fwSET8k0h.Wh5EvC-bo Feedback-ID: 207158m:207158azGM_-I:207158sdrJJdiQVG X-Report-Abuse: Please forward a copy of this message, including all headers, to X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BnQQt45vhz4LN5 X-Spamd-Bar: ++++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=smtpservice.net header.s=m4fue0.a1-4.dyn header.b=cOLpBpzk; dmarc=fail reason="No valid SPF, DKIM not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=softfail (mx1.freebsd.org: 103.47.206.130 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of jeditekunum@gmail.com) smtp.mailfrom=jeditekunum@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [4.17 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; RCVD_DKIM_ARC_DNSWL_MED(-0.50)[]; R_SPF_SOFTFAIL(0.00)[~all]; URI_COUNT_ODD(1.00)[1]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[smtpservice.net:+]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED(-0.20)[103.47.206.130:from]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:1299, ipnet:103.47.204.0/22, country:EU]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[smtpservice.net:s=m4fue0.a1-4.dyn]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[65.128.220.140:received]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.88)[0.880]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-arm@freebsd.org]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.95)[0.948]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.75)[0.745]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-arm]; DMARC_POLICY_SOFTFAIL(0.10)[gmail.com : No valid SPF, DKIM not aligned (relaxed), none] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.33 X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 17:11:35 -0000 Has anyone gotten FreeBSD running on https://groboards.com/giant-board/ = ? It=E2=80=99s a ATSAMA5D27C-D1G From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Thu Sep 10 17:15:04 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F3AE3DE8F9 for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 17:15:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tech-lists@zyxst.net) Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BnQVv3ByNz4LvT for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 17:15:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tech-lists@zyxst.net) Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F1F25C0050 for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 13:15:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 10 Sep 2020 13:15:02 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zyxst.net; h= date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=fm3; bh=Pwsrx9MJ3fJjpMupre7xUPHDr91 v4OhUvdStcThtTug=; b=fxrxtx627ZNAtLtEydTaEW/Ey0PIou8dhgtwyaW85rb YFa2ZbwruIyrRCRveXIH+hKiLQez5Y7UKQKUMsyC48544N09/voanvoVMMaDZ8Ll Aa3UblFY5+J3EpL+DFRCoO5c3kLH17+Kmk2nfYmU7Vs9YvlNgIODOBB7/sG3mE95 Ur7rsMN0o1DHFS8BkJwFgOezD9t2dm9F8BK96GyMCOaezAg4hl8r65eTkW9Ax4V4 Opbl+UALmVLA6d/9LiWyAmsF4ioklGuqLV3J6fLiB7naGtCr8uhnVsNK+Q4y0uOI jPaTdXV4db6URppdLYVS5a8b6bMtcmxGoe70KIayxzw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=Pwsrx9 MJ3fJjpMupre7xUPHDr91v4OhUvdStcThtTug=; b=bwEDQOVHi6oVSJY8sOL46F PNgVakbPtmXmR6TZX4jWv4XSj6gSNzIBbV0SqIXM8/MjCrhOHm91hUUSn4mHUwmd hHNXy9u+XCY9HyGqPTb6tGqltMQ1A3/LYgtrgIERPVDAIlrMz6km19yA1kEGgP0u 7ramt1ciZKsaPr7PBsEkdYyl4D94/xTu1c1LxLCxijJOxkVsSCaaudMRdO2g1Zt9 0zX8cMw4maB2ZYP06NlRizJVVLIk6sK4rig5toVRbfXgCpk97wg6p+/yapw6FM9z nWfXrByfZuS4PPL4VClP1mdR76D+DXmFL8jA3PdvXIgPDBOJO5FkmyziyIHyNKfw == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduiedrudehjedguddtgecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepfffhvffukfhfgggtuggjsehgtd erredttdejnecuhfhrohhmpehtvggthhdqlhhishhtshcuoehtvggthhdqlhhishhtshes iiihgihsthdrnhgvtheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnheptdetleekueevtdfhueelieffie dvvdfftdeludetkeffveeuffeltdelvdevgeeunecukfhppeekvddrjedtrdeluddrleel necuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthgvtg hhqdhlihhsthhsseiihiigshhtrdhnvght X-ME-Proxy: Received: from bastion.zyxst.net (bastion.zyxst.net [82.70.91.99]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 80A223280059 for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 13:15:01 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 18:14:32 +0100 From: tech-lists To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: onboard wireless on rpi4 Message-ID: <20200910171432.GC91422@bastion.zyxst.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org References: <20200904134619.GB80905@bastion.zyxst.net> <69934262-D9D3-4986-849D-9E8221D1E387@kronometrix.org> <1677459627.55.1599232125847@localhost> <75E08DC2-D229-45AA-85AE-CCF06FD0B490@kronometrix.org> <09959D86-E3E3-43E9-8134-C2FC73343DBA@lists.zabbadoz.net> <20200905181220.GG80905@bastion.zyxst.net> <9C0C5FEB-2620-49C2-8501-190237644884@googlemail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="oTHb8nViIGeoXxdp" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <9C0C5FEB-2620-49C2-8501-190237644884@googlemail.com> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BnQVv3ByNz4LvT X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=zyxst.net header.s=fm3 header.b=fxrxtx62; dkim=pass header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm3 header.b=bwEDQOVH; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of tech-lists@zyxst.net designates 66.111.4.25 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=tech-lists@zyxst.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.67 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[zyxst.net:s=fm3,messagingengine.com:s=fm3]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.96)[-0.957]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_GOOD(0.00)[66.111.4.25:from]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:66.111.4.25]; MIME_GOOD(-0.20)[multipart/signed,text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-arm@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.99)[-0.993]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[zyxst.net]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[zyxst.net:+,messagingengine.com:+]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.02)[-0.015]; SIGNED_PGP(-2.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:11403, ipnet:66.111.4.0/24, country:US]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-arm]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[66.111.4.25:from] X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 17:15:04 -0000 --oTHb8nViIGeoXxdp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Sep 05, 2020 at 09:17:16PM +0200, Klaus Cucinauomo wrote: > > >> Am 05.09.2020 um 20:12 schrieb tech-lists : >> >> ...Sure, it'll be the next thing i build ... > >> Have to admit i've never built MMCCAM kernel before for rpi 1,2b+ or 3b+. >> What's significant about it? >> >> thanks, >> -- >> J. > >Thanks that you=E2=80=99re willing to step into tests ( a very important t= hing to save the devs some (testing) time >And give feedback on boards/machines that devs don=E2=80=99t own)! Hi, Would you like me to attempt to build GENERIC-MMCCAM on rpi3b+/current or do you specifically need rpi4 ? I'm asking because onboard wifi doesn't work AFAIK on rpi3b+ Where would you like me to post results to? thanks, --=20 J. --oTHb8nViIGeoXxdp Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEE8n3tWhxW11Ccvv9/s8o7QhFzNAUFAl9aXwkACgkQs8o7QhFz NAWydg/+KkzLpabjLUi4v790sgwLdiJaDd37agb4Z0RcSZf5gSqO4AQLg/rxrvay vWeDR/I5fy8QXFInH0ahRpy5+JHNb0aUQmEScnwm8Pd4v/LSovoH66eSsfaZdDRm Pb+DBGbu7FvHUn+8/7T6qMe2HTn8K/cug27j8hWgbfX+vNW+mEMHG4RCNvTeow6P QeNldeKIJm6RyHFG1djzdthg3bFOeDj1Ne/kqb+PZKl0/6EVXYepIjJsCSrqNxE0 AQsC7WsOVbpmdsKI8QhJMKEeLGct10T5lCKSlBjx60nN6tx1BsJStN0IFFuCAjQK tsn8cXgaL5o0wvf/YE+J0bexl+HmYbYX7nC1bOOihIlfDjJMaqXeu5tzOaTWMSOe 3ILL5xSc5v4t8SQcCJK7PaqQJs0DudaTf5ir1XEBoKA2Xw0zXEPtnAsoEmYn/Ayn 6zvE4nnWDz29O7BxQNc0bItPA4NUaqTDDzBZfhUd4nuu+4HqSmJzGONb6WoLEX4L DQEBusNUsNx2SW+HjALRs5XkjCdXWOgzdUHYNoD0EFxfJR2jFT210nzV0itvvYHX +dHENKjlZN+faYkj4yue4Uv/UZr1L7d2BOwPri8Taa8QdPSpoDfrleVfZjXuHPE7 Vk5RCpzytl6U7RHTtAFAZndyGwQc5BSauwjX7cDdZKE1gzkIhns= =fcxY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --oTHb8nViIGeoXxdp-- From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Thu Sep 10 18:41:41 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2860C3E0EDF for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 18:41:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from agapon@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lf1-f66.google.com (mail-lf1-f66.google.com [209.85.167.66]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BnSQr2vwQz4TYf for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 18:41:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from agapon@gmail.com) Received: by mail-lf1-f66.google.com with SMTP id d15so4128859lfq.11 for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 11:41:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:openpgp:autocrypt :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=qnMwWkwOZBxUKQfo3za1v9cMIEvVLbT1UoATV+d03yo=; b=bYvbTSLtexByu+i5/rkP1ADPd1TDRISjsJ51IyEdTQm3taJ5srhg/ETtj5ijKvY3tz dJWl6I32UUZ7KehFzhMhp0HY6HqXIMkZOvb/fF77pGsFFtlE6I6mFadERYOtyy2Ec3SO fiNsWMNaPZuFTxDWRX767sjGG4dEJ+b2GrW+Uw7SrT2r0VY/EZwz441G3vRiTnVbYL7I FGGzuB8OOZ1LzM4Gk7D+K0fjb2hqyCXJyPkQNMXB1aRwIgyeHoCn4+m5aU+SaWXLhf8m rdQVTB0xgeI6lbaREWl3qLrTtVT+YopU8whhDK5H5NzZPW8FlFkCPgj2/6gaNscP5Ujd gn2g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531nqj/QRAndpR5oWrpsOs3Jo6RoHEoeS5k8GT/+mc33EHkzYR+U kbNGFVQkmHOGdQdGtuvQHCW3OYDMCiE= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxpi1S6kyfmeviuQxtKEK2v9fwhYqhVyQ8Jcg1cbF7kVaL36urKXxamuvQSr3YTMsLHa7OBzA== X-Received: by 2002:a19:6818:: with SMTP id d24mr4900552lfc.107.1599763297784; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 11:41:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.88] (east.meadow.volia.net. [93.72.151.96]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id c10sm1547338lfc.4.2020.09.10.11.41.36 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 10 Sep 2020 11:41:37 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: MMCCAM - Re: onboard wireless on rpi4 To: bob prohaska Cc: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" , freebsd-arm@freebsd.org References: <20200904134619.GB80905@bastion.zyxst.net> <69934262-D9D3-4986-849D-9E8221D1E387@kronometrix.org> <1677459627.55.1599232125847@localhost> <75E08DC2-D229-45AA-85AE-CCF06FD0B490@kronometrix.org> <09959D86-E3E3-43E9-8134-C2FC73343DBA@lists.zabbadoz.net> <507782579.41.1599484468967@localhost> <20200907152118.GA89696@www.zefox.net> <40D76B81-934B-43A4-B269-E075D2F4B4CD@lists.zabbadoz.net> <98fb91a8-00e3-4b5c-3b0f-efa2c51388bc@FreeBSD.org> <20200910162452.GA5528@www.zefox.net> From: Andriy Gapon Openpgp: preference=signencrypt Autocrypt: addr=avg@FreeBSD.org; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= mDMEX1iFDhYJKwYBBAHaRw8BAQdAiu8JG/oLFkVkOAJqJc7Dx5KI/Q6C3SBI20EQm+DXnAu0 HkFuZHJpeSBHYXBvbiA8YXZnQEZyZWVCU0Qub3JnPoiWBBMWCAA+FiEEyCHHZM09l0OE3Ir/ 1A1+Gq8+L1EFAl9YhQ4CGwMFCQeEzgAFCwkIBwIGFQoJCAsCBBYCAwECHgECF4AACgkQ1A1+ Gq8+L1Fc0wD/ZjmhHfbCJywZU3aOxXIPjcz73FYEGMvqMCCLAWyLbSABALFL+1ZNrjV3BGjq 889cOYFuboA/Yn3eWezS+tfqYBsGuDgEX1iFDhIKKwYBBAGXVQEFAQEHQL6B20Xi600TrkpG P9fWjl7JtHNxqrHKhX6Kg7kgb4ILAwEIB4h+BBgWCAAmFiEEyCHHZM09l0OE3Ir/1A1+Gq8+ L1EFAl9YhQ4CGwwFCQeEzgAACgkQ1A1+Gq8+L1F3cgEAktp4h+IJUJxL1vn6zMOt//znni/J TanKfQuA8wGXcGkBAKpZJhqMkg+pKk7MGvJhgJ6nCpTZ+rMK6vZVZLUWc3QF Message-ID: <008036a3-bdbf-3ee9-ca21-d445c0867921@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 21:41:35 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/60.0 Thunderbird/60.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200910162452.GA5528@www.zefox.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BnSQr2vwQz4TYf X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of agapon@gmail.com designates 209.85.167.66 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=agapon@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.52 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:209.85.128.0/17]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.63)[-0.630]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[avg@FreeBSD.org,agapon@gmail.com]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[93.72.151.96:received]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[avg@FreeBSD.org,agapon@gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:209.85.128.0/17, country:US]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.92)[-0.918]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.97)[-0.967]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-arm@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[FreeBSD.org]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[209.85.167.66:from]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[209.85.167.66:from]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-arm] X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 18:41:41 -0000 On 10/09/2020 19:24, bob prohaska wrote: > On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 09:59:36AM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote: >> >> Bob, I noticed this: >> (sdda0:sdhci_slot0:0:0:0): Partition 0 -> 8265462 >> >> Perhaps r365445 might be of some help. >> > > Indeed, moving up to r365459 results in a kernel that boots > to multi-user. There does seems to be a lot of chatter about > > sdda0: SDHC ED4QT 3.0 SN 9B9A5304 MFG 05/2018 by 27 SM > (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): daclose > (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): daopen > (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): daclose > ..... > It seems harmless, but certainly looks odd. Maybe you have some CAMDEBUG related options in your kernel config? Or maybe MMCCAM enables some of them -- I haven't checked. > The complete console output is at > sdda0: SDHC ED4QT 3.0 SN 9B9A5304 MFG 05/2018 by 27 SM > > Thanks for reading! -- Andriy Gapon From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Thu Sep 10 19:04:48 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F60C3E1755 for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 19:04:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from maciphone2@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-wr1-x42b.google.com (mail-wr1-x42b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42b]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BnSxW4db5z4Vy0 for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 19:04:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from maciphone2@googlemail.com) Received: by mail-wr1-x42b.google.com with SMTP id k15so8085523wrn.10 for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 12:04:47 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :subject:date:references:to:in-reply-to:message-id; bh=c5OrnZY0FDmLasbTKJf2p2j/WhaifzhqIWxKifOzWv0=; b=OR9UOUjJ8p9nSWTRDudaDvaLxtkeSPMgmkA008QSzFGMwOC+7NkomBch21Ob09ex3g NcUiEf6nZzEEAHcnYaEz2qeB4j9ms/Qw4Jlja/KIVhT/nIt6Qtu7fEFUXaovUxz+LIzG aSVk6msQq3rPMng7ZWiULeZiTvSm+QjOr7d0xtdlIfSkAvHOyqPv11V/nFgzLdIvKs8v e0sjPl+K8k188S4z0g6gEQld16A7Lb1PPhnXfmC3wjnPpYoV3bho2NTZiSurDZTqexXQ 9pSDPzcEOWviZbtMpvlTcqAmA1CWQ5fVf5zABJUfZsnIk7piMbddGdnsmypqMkchc7Zn FYgw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530W8o5erSbncuNUmK4O1iOyngGds1AQGif5dwNh7vAhAfKP2j4M wHCiLAYjFW0eNfDgHSzBFwtvSs6lTTI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzETFsiC16nfavycW7b4AjSg80hkH4nLBlZxlQdLYAY0Bo3cGCat9v7Nje2kade3DA4GGRL2g== X-Received: by 2002:adf:f903:: with SMTP id b3mr10999026wrr.142.1599764685490; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 12:04:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (x2e726b57.dyn.telefonica.de. [46.114.107.87]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id h184sm5045111wmh.41.2020.09.10.12.04.43 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 10 Sep 2020 12:04:44 -0700 (PDT) From: Klaus Cucinauomo Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.0.3.2.26\)) Subject: Re: onboard wireless on rpi4 Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 21:04:42 +0200 References: <20200904134619.GB80905@bastion.zyxst.net> <69934262-D9D3-4986-849D-9E8221D1E387@kronometrix.org> <1677459627.55.1599232125847@localhost> <75E08DC2-D229-45AA-85AE-CCF06FD0B490@kronometrix.org> <09959D86-E3E3-43E9-8134-C2FC73343DBA@lists.zabbadoz.net> <20200905181220.GG80905@bastion.zyxst.net> <9C0C5FEB-2620-49C2-8501-190237644884@googlemail.com> <20200910171432.GC91422@bastion.zyxst.net> To: tech-lists , freebsd-arm@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20200910171432.GC91422@bastion.zyxst.net> Message-Id: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.0.3.2.26) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BnSxW4db5z4Vy0 X-Spamd-Bar: --- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.47 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[googlemail.com]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a00:1450:4000::/36]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[googlemail.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[googlemail.com,quarantine]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.02)[-1.016]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[46.114.107.87:received]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[googlemail.com]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2a00:1450::/32, country:US]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.98)[-0.976]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[googlemail.com:s=20161025]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[googlemail.com:dkim]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.98)[-0.981]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-arm@freebsd.org]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2a00:1450:4864:20::42b:from]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-arm] X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 19:04:48 -0000 Hi John, > Am 10.09.2020 um 19:14 schrieb tech-lists : >=20 > I'm asking because onboard wifi doesn't work > AFAIK on rpi3b+ no surprise that you lost orientation in this DMA +XHCI+ WIFI + SDIO = mixedChaos- thread :-) In 1 brutal sentence:-) : onboard wifi also doesn't work on RPI4. I explained the reason for that in a former post. > Where would you like me to post results to? While you can post MMCCAM-results of e.g.: `camcontrol devlist` or the = groundbreaking sdiotool :-) here to the list, we normally post dmesg-results to : https://dmesgd.nycbug.org To make the chaos perfect:=20 A needed test(for Crowston so he can mark it as double proved by the = list) would be to=20 let go of the **stalin organ of file-transfer-tests**, invented by Mark = (Millard) on your already compiled crowston-dma-patch. (Check Md5sums of large file transfers to USB-media) and post the = results(before/after as you did before) here. >=20 > thanks, > --=20 > J. Thanks ! kls=20 From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Thu Sep 10 19:07:14 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FF4C3E1844 for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 19:07:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd@www.zefox.net) Received: from www.zefox.net (www.zefox.net [50.1.20.27]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "www.zefox.com", Issuer "www.zefox.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BnT0K4Kstz4Vsq; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 19:07:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd@www.zefox.net) Received: from www.zefox.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by www.zefox.net (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 08AJ7Nph006002 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 10 Sep 2020 12:07:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fbsd@www.zefox.net) Received: (from fbsd@localhost) by www.zefox.net (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 08AJ7NX8006001; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 12:07:23 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fbsd) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 12:07:23 -0700 From: bob prohaska To: Andriy Gapon Cc: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" , freebsd-arm@freebsd.org, bob prohaska Subject: Re: MMCCAM - Re: onboard wireless on rpi4 Message-ID: <20200910190723.GA5825@www.zefox.net> References: <1677459627.55.1599232125847@localhost> <75E08DC2-D229-45AA-85AE-CCF06FD0B490@kronometrix.org> <09959D86-E3E3-43E9-8134-C2FC73343DBA@lists.zabbadoz.net> <507782579.41.1599484468967@localhost> <20200907152118.GA89696@www.zefox.net> <40D76B81-934B-43A4-B269-E075D2F4B4CD@lists.zabbadoz.net> <98fb91a8-00e3-4b5c-3b0f-efa2c51388bc@FreeBSD.org> <20200910162452.GA5528@www.zefox.net> <008036a3-bdbf-3ee9-ca21-d445c0867921@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <008036a3-bdbf-3ee9-ca21-d445c0867921@FreeBSD.org> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BnT0K4Kstz4Vsq X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of fbsd@www.zefox.net has no SPF policy when checking 50.1.20.27) smtp.mailfrom=fbsd@www.zefox.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.80 / 15.00]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; WWW_DOT_DOMAIN(0.50)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.03)[-0.027]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[zefox.net]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.53)[-0.534]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.54)[-0.542]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7065, ipnet:50.1.16.0/20, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-arm]; MID_RHS_WWW(0.50)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 19:07:14 -0000 On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 09:41:35PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote: > On 10/09/2020 19:24, bob prohaska wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 09:59:36AM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote: > >> > >> Bob, I noticed this: > >> (sdda0:sdhci_slot0:0:0:0): Partition 0 -> 8265462 > >> > >> Perhaps r365445 might be of some help. > >> > > > > Indeed, moving up to r365459 results in a kernel that boots > > to multi-user. There does seems to be a lot of chatter about > > > > sdda0: SDHC ED4QT 3.0 SN 9B9A5304 MFG 05/2018 by 27 SM > > (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): daclose > > (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): daopen > > (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): daclose > > ..... > > It seems harmless, but certainly looks odd. > > Maybe you have some CAMDEBUG related options in your kernel config? > Or maybe MMCCAM enables some of them -- I haven't checked. > Nothing added/changed by me. If it's debug output that's good, I thought it was some sort of probe or negotiation failure. Thanks for the quick reply! bob prohaska From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Thu Sep 10 20:11:48 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C86C33E2F82 for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 20:11:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fuz@fuz.su) Received: from fuz.su (fuz.su [IPv6:2001:41d0:8:e508::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "amnesiac", Issuer "amnesiac" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BnVQr1GVBz4bBF for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 20:11:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fuz@fuz.su) Received: from fuz.su (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fuz.su (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 08AKBkun099845 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 22:11:46 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from fuz@fuz.su) Received: (from fuz@localhost) by fuz.su (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 08AKBkqH099844 for freebsd-arm@freebsd.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 22:11:46 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from fuz) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 22:11:46 +0200 From: Robert Clausecker To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Attempting to install on RPi4B w/ UEFI, having some problems Message-ID: <20200910201146.GA99827@fuz.su> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BnVQr1GVBz4bBF X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of fuz@fuz.su designates 2001:41d0:8:e508::1 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=fuz@fuz.su X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.41 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.93)[-0.930]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+a:c]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-arm@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.01)[-1.010]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[fuz.su]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.17)[-0.174]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:16276, ipnet:2001:41d0::/32, country:FR]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-arm] X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 20:11:48 -0000 Greetings! I'm trying to install FreeBSD on a Raspberry Pi 4B w/ UEFI. I've done the following: * update the RPi4 firmware to support USb boot * format a USB drive as follows $ gpart show => 63 468862065 da0 MBR (224G) 63 32768 1 efi (16M) 32831 468829297 2 freebsd (224G) => 0 468829297 da0s2 BSD (224G) 0 16777216 2 freebsd-swap (8.0G) 16777216 452052081 1 freebsd-zfs (216G) * make a dos file system for the efi partition and copy the uefi files (most recent version) in there * make a ZFS pool and file systems as appropriate for a boot environment * build CURRENT from source with D25201 manually applied (the other patches have apparently already been merged) and install it into the pool, apply basic configuration. The fstab says: /dev/da0s1 /boot/efi msdos rw 0 0 /dev/da0s2b none swap sw 0 0 loader.conf says: cryptodev_load="YES" zfs_load="YES" * copy loader.efi to /boot/efi/efi/boot/bootaa64.efi * boot into uefi config menu, set console to serial, choose boot device, set up ACPI+DTB mode, disable memory limit * kernel boots fine into login shell but reports no DTB found. Some things don't seem to work correctly: * if I plug the USB drive into a USB 3.0 port, everything works fine until root is mounted. At that point, every further disk access fails with IO errors: (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): READ(10). CDB: 28 00 01 80 a0 c1 00 00 07 00 (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): CAM status: CCB request completed with an error (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): Retrying command, 3 more tries remain This can be worked around using * a genet ethernet device does not seem to exist and consequentially, no network connection can be established. * pciconf -l yields no PCI devices and dmesg suggests no pci bus was detected (grepping for pci yields no results) * if I select DTB-only mode in the UEFI configuration, the kernel hangs during boot. In any case it complains about not having received a DTB. What can I do to fix these problems? Is there anything I missed? Yours, Robert Clausecker -- () ascii ribbon campaign - for an 8-bit clean world /\ - against html email - against proprietary attachments From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Thu Sep 10 21:02:51 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C67F3E3A39 for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 21:02:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from greg@unrelenting.technology) Received: from out0.migadu.com (out0.migadu.com [IPv6:2001:41d0:2:267::]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BnWYk2b7bz4dpm for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 21:02:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from greg@unrelenting.technology) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 00:03:16 +0300 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=unrelenting.technology; s=default; t=1599771761; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=/648F/aCYNGGoB+3TCE2eRJBuenUwLiRr5EqA3Oiek4=; b=jjNT97aKojMxRNPFUftLyWh5Qo9NHwlDCZq/2TAu7HZP5BGmCpLbrjYexEz5RnCcqgpqAx Qxstwx1lSzgekgkzvDVxr0eLJXEPBtdWwtBbDCr9/Mu3IE7FPpsodP7Y6jfYhuxx2khPME cD0/SGE1QEi14cqtsEYjt4ZxHivbSYM= X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. From: Greg V Subject: Re: Attempting to install on RPi4B w/ UEFI, having some problems To: Robert Clausecker Cc: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <20200910201146.GA99827@fuz.su> References: <20200910201146.GA99827@fuz.su> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed X-Spam-Score: -0.10 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BnWYk2b7bz4dpm X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=unrelenting.technology header.s=default header.b=jjNT97aK; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=unrelenting.technology; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of greg@unrelenting.technology designates 2001:41d0:2:267:: as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=greg@unrelenting.technology X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.02 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.99)[-0.988]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[unrelenting.technology:s=default]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2001:41d0:2:267::]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.99)[-0.994]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[unrelenting.technology:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[unrelenting.technology,none]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.04)[-1.040]; RCVD_COUNT_ZERO(0.00)[0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:16276, ipnet:2001:41d0::/32, country:FR]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-arm] X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 21:02:51 -0000 On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 22:11, Robert Clausecker wrote: > Greetings! > > I'm trying to install FreeBSD on a Raspberry Pi 4B w/ UEFI [..] > * build CURRENT from source with D25201 manually applied (the other > patches > have apparently already been merged) D25219 hasn't been merged. D25201 *was* merged! Is your source tree up to date? > * if I plug the USB drive into a USB 3.0 port, everything works fine > until > root is mounted. At that point, every further disk access fails > with IO > errors: > > (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): READ(10). CDB: 28 00 01 80 a0 c1 00 00 07 00 > (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): CAM status: CCB request completed with an > error > (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): Retrying command, 3 more tries remain That's what I was seeing when above-3GB DMA was happening, i.e. without D25219. Interesting that 2.0 vs 3.0 port matters for you, I don't think it did to me. > This can be worked around using using..? Some part of the mail was lost here? > * a genet ethernet device does not seem to exist and consequentially, > no network connection can be established. Nobody has written an ACPI attachment for the genet driver yet :( (And for other Pi-specific things for that matter. Meanwhile in NetBSD: https://dmesgd.nycbug.org/index.cgi?do=view&id=5562 'bcmmbox0 at acpi0 (RPIQ, BCM2849-0)' and so on) I wanted to do the genet one but kinda don't have the time/motivation right now. > * pciconf -l yields no PCI devices and dmesg suggests no pci bus was > detected (grepping for pci yields no results) What do you want to do with PCI? Your USB works, forget about PCI. (The ACPI DSDT table presents the XHCI controller that's behind PCIe *as if* it was not behind anything, just directly attached onto the SoC. No PCI support needed at all!) (Yes, this does mean that RPi4-UEFI is not compatible with desoldering the XHCI controller chip and adding a PCIe riser there, lol.) From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Thu Sep 10 21:17:42 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 762273E3CDB for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 21:17:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fuz@fuz.su) Received: from fuz.su (fuz.su [IPv6:2001:41d0:8:e508::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "amnesiac", Issuer "amnesiac" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BnWts42dFz4f9g for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 21:17:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fuz@fuz.su) Received: from fuz.su (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fuz.su (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 08ALHcWB003933 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 10 Sep 2020 23:17:38 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from fuz@fuz.su) Received: (from fuz@localhost) by fuz.su (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 08ALHcaS003932; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 23:17:38 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from fuz) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 23:17:38 +0200 From: Robert Clausecker To: Greg V Cc: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Attempting to install on RPi4B w/ UEFI, having some problems Message-ID: <20200910211738.GA3324@fuz.su> References: <20200910201146.GA99827@fuz.su> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BnWts42dFz4f9g X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of fuz@fuz.su designates 2001:41d0:8:e508::1 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=fuz@fuz.su X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.12 / 15.00]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+a]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.01)[-1.006]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[fuz.su]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.003]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.81)[-0.809]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:16276, ipnet:2001:41d0::/32, country:FR]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-arm] X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 21:17:42 -0000 Hi Greg, On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 12:03:16AM +0300, Greg V wrote: > D25219 hasn't been merged. D25201 *was* merged! Yes, D25219 was meant and has been manually applied to the CURRENT source. > Is your source tree up to date? Fetched it on monday. I can rebuild from current source if that makes a difference. > > (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): READ(10). CDB: 28 00 01 80 a0 c1 00 00 07 00 > > (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): CAM status: CCB request completed with an > > error > > (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): Retrying command, 3 more tries remain > > That's what I was seeing when above-3GB DMA was happening, > i.e. without D25219. D25219 was merged into the kernel build (unless I did something terribly wrong). Is there anything I can provide you to aid in debugging? > Interesting that 2.0 vs 3.0 port matters for you, I don't think it did > to me. > > > This can be worked around using > > using..? Some part of the mail was lost here? "using a USB 2.0 only port". Sorry, this got lost during copy-editing. > > * a genet ethernet device does not seem to exist and consequentially, > > no network connection can be established. > > Nobody has written an ACPI attachment for the genet driver yet :( Oh no :-( Is there a way to attach the device manually or by some other way? Some sort of hints mechanism? I can use USB ethernet as a stop gap solution, but having gigabit ethernet is something I kinda built on having. > (And for other Pi-specific things for that matter. > Meanwhile in NetBSD: https://dmesgd.nycbug.org/index.cgi?do=view&id=5562 > 'bcmmbox0 at acpi0 (RPIQ, BCM2849-0)' and so on) > > I wanted to do the genet one but kinda don't have the time/motivation > right now. Let me know when you get to it. I appreciate your help! > > * pciconf -l yields no PCI devices and dmesg suggests no pci bus was > > detected (grepping for pci yields no results) > > What do you want to do with PCI? Your USB works, forget about PCI. > > (The ACPI DSDT table presents the XHCI controller that's behind PCIe > *as if* it was not behind anything, just directly attached onto the SoC. > No PCI support needed at all!) Now that's a smart idea. Ok, so I'll stop worrying about PCI. > (Yes, this does mean that RPi4-UEFI is not compatible with desoldering > the > XHCI controller chip and adding a PCIe riser there, lol.) Have not planned to do that anyway. I wonder if people are going to build break-out boards w/ PCIe slots if RPi4 compute modules come out in the future... Yours, Robert Clausecker -- () ascii ribbon campaign - for an 8-bit clean world /\ - against html email - against proprietary attachments From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Thu Sep 10 21:19:25 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C12833E4051 for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 21:19:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from maciphone2@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-wr1-x431.google.com (mail-wr1-x431.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::431]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BnWws0vgMz4f5L for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 21:19:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from maciphone2@googlemail.com) Received: by mail-wr1-x431.google.com with SMTP id z1so8785085wrt.3 for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 14:19:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :subject:date:references:to:in-reply-to:message-id; bh=y0EM2Nlr0aHW7xThssI7uTyHNeZEwlYENymUhIo2n0c=; b=k3ebATvKg5osritTqwOx9OpeqHHjs4FO7V0ycZIUJY+ukw0hULS2wXUDJo21m4hgda XGcsTFV3XjM+yMhrbPVjx03zqqWvWCTgO8458BWd39ByuOr6xo09Y8FCtsvsr5IElvjz JXKPzjQh2NeRuveqZ/ar7MTzHUo9wDns03OzfeAY0iuTm875ueCT2ZBMzzq4u1RSWfbF TjoHbTk0vI3xFWfpKlyZgGQH7ZetDgoih95Ajqr8Mj9AIQhl1CArRFD8vx/zlAWyMVLb DHZsbF2+w6kCJ95e/Mk8LiHAPTShnbDMhrHr8K5aMdDxJetFkMyDwt2HtK1a+6aLV874 X5tQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530BcWlmWafPCZTp5dkrVfhKqE2jvKSfhc5IkKENXmcQKVUQYX6q YxeywLaeJsE0AigBHPe9tZMkWEQq5SM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwrgZT/GlybxiVq7+VHHFDeMmi+nWFZC412ZwxTTSfPpvQA77XGGahqqNxv0/A/ubYcO2A8Kg== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:430d:: with SMTP id h13mr11641404wrq.41.1599772762903; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 14:19:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (x2e726b57.dyn.telefonica.de. [46.114.107.87]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id v17sm195763wrc.23.2020.09.10.14.19.21 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 10 Sep 2020 14:19:22 -0700 (PDT) From: Klaus Cucinauomo Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.0.3.2.26\)) Subject: Re: Attempting to install on RPi4B w/ UEFI, having some problems Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 23:19:20 +0200 References: <20200910201146.GA99827@fuz.su> To: Robert Clausecker , freebsd-arm@freebsd.org, myfreeweb In-Reply-To: <20200910201146.GA99827@fuz.su> Message-Id: <7022F32B-14F1-41D7-BDEA-71050AA16D0C@googlemail.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.0.3.2.26) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BnWws0vgMz4f5L X-Spamd-Bar: --- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.56 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[googlemail.com]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a00:1450:4000::/36]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[googlemail.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[googlemail.com,quarantine]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.11)[-1.107]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[46.114.107.87:received]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[googlemail.com]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2a00:1450::/32, country:US]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.98)[-0.977]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[googlemail.com:s=20161025]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.98)[-0.977]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-arm@freebsd.org]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[googlemail.com:dkim]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2a00:1450:4864:20::431:from]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-arm] X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 21:19:25 -0000 > Am 10.09.2020 um 22:11 schrieb Robert Clausecker : > =E2=80=A6... >=20 > What can I do to fix these problems? currently nothing , except: Helping out with freebsd-RPI4-ACPI/Uefi-development together with = myfreeweb-Greg V ;-)=20 or use the u-boot fdt -version where we have working genet and a working = pcie-driver (USB-mass-storage issues are fixed in : https://reviews.freebsd.org/D26344 ) > Is there anything I missed? until now: No.=20 Regards Klaus= From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Thu Sep 10 21:23:40 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72B453E4479 for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 21:23:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fuz@fuz.su) Received: from fuz.su (fuz.su [IPv6:2001:41d0:8:e508::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "amnesiac", Issuer "amnesiac" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BnX1l3KBSz4fCw for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 21:23:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fuz@fuz.su) Received: from fuz.su (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fuz.su (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 08ALNbYe004335 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 10 Sep 2020 23:23:37 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from fuz@fuz.su) Received: (from fuz@localhost) by fuz.su (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 08ALNbAU004334; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 23:23:37 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from fuz) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 23:23:37 +0200 From: Robert Clausecker To: Klaus Cucinauomo Cc: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org, myfreeweb Subject: Re: Attempting to install on RPi4B w/ UEFI, having some problems Message-ID: <20200910212337.GA4139@fuz.su> References: <20200910201146.GA99827@fuz.su> <7022F32B-14F1-41D7-BDEA-71050AA16D0C@googlemail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <7022F32B-14F1-41D7-BDEA-71050AA16D0C@googlemail.com> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BnX1l3KBSz4fCw X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of fuz@fuz.su designates 2001:41d0:8:e508::1 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=fuz@fuz.su X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.87 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.999]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+a:c]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[fuz.su]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.99)[-0.993]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.58)[-0.576]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[googlemail.com]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:16276, ipnet:2001:41d0::/32, country:FR]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-arm] X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 21:23:40 -0000 Hi Klaus, On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 11:19:20PM +0200, Klaus Cucinauomo wrote: > > > > Am 10.09.2020 um 22:11 schrieb Robert Clausecker : > > …... > > > > What can I do to fix these problems? > > currently nothing , except: > Helping out with freebsd-RPI4-ACPI/Uefi-development together with myfreeweb-Greg V ;-) Sure, I'd love to! Unfortunately, I'm quite unexperienced with kernel development. I can at least help you with testing and bug reports if that helps you. If you need any debugging details from me, please let me know. > or > > use the u-boot fdt -version where we have working genet and a working pcie-driver > (USB-mass-storage issues are fixed in : > https://reviews.freebsd.org/D26344 ) Cool! I'll try applying this patch and see if it helps. > > Is there anything I missed? > > until now: > No. > > Regards > Klaus Thanks a lot! I'll keep my eyes peeled for further updates. Yours sincerely, Robert Clausecker -- () ascii ribbon campaign - for an 8-bit clean world /\ - against html email - against proprietary attachments From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Thu Sep 10 21:25:52 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA7513E40F2 for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 21:25:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tech-lists@zyxst.net) Received: from wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.24]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BnX4H5krkz4fqy for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 21:25:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tech-lists@zyxst.net) Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA8FDC6B for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 17:25:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 10 Sep 2020 17:25:49 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zyxst.net; h= date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=fm3; bh=xVv2C8Ww0DmjTDmmKainBHaahOF IKUNhKHSZm5Grul8=; b=jMVc0gBwmE16c/lVKu51OSfv17NftNCOoICb25aidNQ bqu4uDMkx2MVZ2hd1OdZBSout+nLPmYH/YUo26q3kVdMrqXYkQ9h48M+rJnl1p5Y 1b4zZz2ZcG9LyZLRCKaT5ggWyDfr7zWjba+hnblDoFGI3bQdduukIccWB//ydb8Q u5RfttjDk36WIpqmtmOMI7jQOtgZG3BJ2IwhY5U7Qz9kO+lWz3o+yhMdE1Nk7j6+ mrpLZqzhEMv6Vp8ISLs7f4Mm5U0mou6br7s5qiefYit9nWQ0RvSMLlb1yEoaDd+I AvFRxAGdJLUIrkvIuAjUbhlBJoNc1Kp/09cmJ+fCHuQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=xVv2C8 Ww0DmjTDmmKainBHaahOFIKUNhKHSZm5Grul8=; b=VPzIvcYgh2h4CVbVqrHHZI jUriX8CtNqmDRijnwKJl3tUKiQlRd9iJlM4dOjdAZvksbWImEdpq9NufXH969njb vr9Jroaj0EB1HHnhPG0JKeDQH4X9a0aF6IPpwJpEiyb0ItVmz02t211btEFNqGXQ IF33072/B892Bftz+HjW110aeg8OEZU5Z0/KUunUhyGwyb2XnF5Rbc1HstmAuQHK EwQ/tS6nQwjBkxtRjD8RrJsPuA0+M4NKgOx7HkZnvNHcDcnFIORSpRNzZ2+MgJxI ITHGsTZMXuqRXuyzfooCd5Sj7iJgKUEG6u2fij/a9yGBB1nu+EKbnNNYCCP0EnJA == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduiedrudehjedgudehgecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepfffhvffukfhfgggtuggjsehgtd erredttddvnecuhfhrohhmpehtvggthhdqlhhishhtshcuoehtvggthhdqlhhishhtshes iiihgihsthdrnhgvtheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnheptdehiefgvddufeekkedvtdefvd ettddtkeduvdegveelffdtkeffudejvdfhudetnecukfhppeekvddrjedtrdeluddrleel necuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthgvtg hhqdhlihhsthhsseiihiigshhtrdhnvght X-ME-Proxy: Received: from bastion.zyxst.net (bastion.zyxst.net [82.70.91.99]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 14D593280064 for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 17:25:48 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 22:25:19 +0100 From: tech-lists To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Attempting to install on RPi4B w/ UEFI, having some problems Message-ID: <20200910212519.GD91422@bastion.zyxst.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org References: <20200910201146.GA99827@fuz.su> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="n2Pv11Ogg/Ox8ay5" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200910201146.GA99827@fuz.su> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BnX4H5krkz4fqy X-Spamd-Bar: ----- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=zyxst.net header.s=fm3 header.b=jMVc0gBw; dkim=pass header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm3 header.b=VPzIvcYg; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of tech-lists@zyxst.net designates 64.147.123.24 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=tech-lists@zyxst.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-5.37 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_VERYGOOD(0.00)[64.147.123.24:from]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[zyxst.net:s=fm3,messagingengine.com:s=fm3]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:64.147.123.24]; MIME_GOOD(-0.20)[multipart/signed,text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-arm@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.001]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[zyxst.net]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[zyxst.net:+,messagingengine.com:+]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.71)[-0.707]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.97)[-0.966]; SIGNED_PGP(-2.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:11403, ipnet:64.147.123.0/24, country:US]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-arm]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[64.147.123.24:from] X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 21:25:52 -0000 --n2Pv11Ogg/Ox8ay5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 10:11:19PM +0200, Robert Clausecker wrote: > >Some things don't seem to work correctly: > >* if I plug the USB drive into a USB 3.0 port, everything works fine until > root is mounted. At that point, every further disk access fails with IO > errors: > >(da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): READ(10). CDB: 28 00 01 80 a0 c1 00 00 07 00 >(da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): CAM status: CCB request completed with an error >(da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): Retrying command, 3 more tries remain > I was seeing something like this. I applied D26344 to the sources (am now on r365391M) and rebuilt, and the problem is fixed. My context differs a little bit because I use u-boot. But was getting the u= sb3 hd resetting trying to write anything over about 2GB to the usb3 disk. dd if=3D/dev/random of=3D/usb3mountpoint/bigfilename.bin bs=3D1m count=3D3000 = would do it. I've not checked yet with md5/sha256 actually transferring files yet though. I'll try this when the system is less busy and post results here. In the meantime, the 1Tb external disk is zfs mounted at /usr/local and is running a poudriere(-devel) instance happily with loads over 10.00 and am seeing no filesystem or usb errors. It's as, if not more, responsive than an amd64 i7 system at similar load. I'm using GENERIC-NODEBUG now, but with no other changes like MALLOC_PRODUCTION though. --=20 J. --n2Pv11Ogg/Ox8ay5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEE8n3tWhxW11Ccvv9/s8o7QhFzNAUFAl9amc0ACgkQs8o7QhFz NAUx3A//byljWO+zpXFds7V7KamUOVFnKzZTUZGkp9BnyZ4yuKj8Rjk3rPj0esRg lYKTSwdKx+kjpc8PbYhciI49YOtPuXLTeJhOiYxst+cp1vOx2opGioPNZmmcjRA7 EG9Rju3gUrvTSM2/O8SOAEg230RiZZ+w0dm3NTNuA/a+/vesAJE3OSKbHjt50Efc lSg/oHmV+ybToLcy35znRIOTbAznEs5QLHkRmB8NT+o++pDzhh31yvoekGh8Yoak UrpAIoK0WH6oN1bsEB29blKs5jIQyB8W75jFzwvTZonzMJLMBkmO+ITOGEvSpTFU GvDBkxUMyoP25C9z5NLH9qvX0o9Dv7luc+FH9c0RREpeOZ0sVcX+C4qU3C7kPDUA s3Bq18Yx/h8gV2qElLiFy4zT0USxhNFLBzdPcPbr91OKKQ65+63acXBLZiqSzZHI VzMU3RbTZ6TrRPID+VgsL2XO//Xa4YuGILFNaywgjnV1VbGJoEEI0z29VthWMfrg EGx4/NR1DcJ8VnKXmpkLTg+WU04wc8kACBKsp7Uo4FUIjrX97fPQkuE5DWZ83oDW 5KmHSVOci0mPi7s9DQigZ8jUKf7flt9m6n0k74uXFvyruJcmTJ8b4OEkdtHXr4Nk d00xCAowWxM6otvs5jnac5LCthDIXUUy25e1qp3Y5NJes59//k0= =NC7M -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --n2Pv11Ogg/Ox8ay5-- From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Thu Sep 10 21:29:27 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A512D3E4625 for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 21:29:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from maciphone2@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-wm1-x342.google.com (mail-wm1-x342.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::342]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BnX8Q5fjJz4g1g for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 21:29:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from maciphone2@googlemail.com) Received: by mail-wm1-x342.google.com with SMTP id w2so2037435wmi.1 for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 14:29:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:mime-version:subject:date:references:to :in-reply-to:message-id; bh=bnvX9e4TR8psrClHovMdKySeUC1FETKaHN0sd8epnLY=; b=K8DOB/wvPqdSLEtd/BUjEWYmVBhXl3eSLKVXcQIzFOeztvjVgeH374ueajvgo+1AVq kecPsxKSxcpBmDYMDnKtMOaEbKOyx8v0+c9yURrS2KkniV0kl6zGkkWkiXfwoNP8kLJz fry+vei1JyPfx9KcHFSly+OghFOgxB9pM+us0huRIGVDeNQLRVlgSAy68J90Ajep8Llw v+XrPYAXQgg6a8X4lAfjAFMLFLNetZc2HUX73QOYY2l+uFFGK/mOnyzK+2R4J3oaLZNX fChCK7xqvhqXK/qo9kIg4moe0l3iZMkFtjtfx1ZFWm4J6xijB3Z+P8M3UN9tXp9Knu29 kICw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531KdD1+45ApTYu70zR4JoNjH0KI7Wi46yyHH3NzzSrjBN0Fagic 5MSwBCWkjElhZSBDlr/8x5WCyzKrmNk= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy1AVKVdu/Towd24Y6Vxiro7r5f15rvIM9K3BdT1HoGtcpdh/vRPjPB8DTUI0kmptcZToOaGg== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:e389:: with SMTP id a131mr1989154wmh.181.1599773364931; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 14:29:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (x2e726b57.dyn.telefonica.de. [46.114.107.87]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id f6sm7122616wme.32.2020.09.10.14.29.23 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 10 Sep 2020 14:29:24 -0700 (PDT) From: Klaus Cucinauomo Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.0.3.2.26\)) Subject: Re: Attempting to install on RPi4B w/ UEFI, having some problems Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 23:29:22 +0200 References: <20200910201146.GA99827@fuz.su> <7022F32B-14F1-41D7-BDEA-71050AA16D0C@googlemail.com> <20200910212337.GA4139@fuz.su> To: Robert Clausecker , freebsd-arm@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20200910212337.GA4139@fuz.su> Message-Id: <2B9C39C1-21CC-4422-849A-179D066618D8@googlemail.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.0.3.2.26) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BnX8Q5fjJz4g1g X-Spamd-Bar: -- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.46 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[googlemail.com]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a00:1450:4000::/36]; URI_COUNT_ODD(1.00)[1]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[googlemail.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[googlemail.com,quarantine]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.01)[-1.009]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[googlemail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2a00:1450::/32, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[googlemail.com:dkim]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.97)[-0.973]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[googlemail.com:s=20161025]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[46.114.107.87:received]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.97)[-0.975]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-arm@freebsd.org]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2a00:1450:4864:20::342:from]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-arm] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.33 X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 21:29:27 -0000 Hi Robert, > Am 10.09.2020 um 23:23 schrieb Robert Clausecker : >=20 >> =E2=80=A6.. >> use the u-boot fdt -version where we have working genet and a working = pcie-driver >> (USB-mass-storage issues are fixed in : >> https://reviews.freebsd.org/D26344 ) >=20 > Cool! I'll try applying this patch and see if it helps. Requires a special u-boot-version /fdt !=20 Details: https://wiki.freebsd.org/arm/Raspberry%20Pi = thanks, Regards Klaus From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Thu Sep 10 21:34:14 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBB453E4978 for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 21:34:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fuz@fuz.su) Received: from fuz.su (fuz.su [IPv6:2001:41d0:8:e508::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "amnesiac", Issuer "amnesiac" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BnXFy1Q8Bz4gSG for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 21:34:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fuz@fuz.su) Received: from fuz.su (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fuz.su (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 08ALYCDC005078 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 10 Sep 2020 23:34:12 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from fuz@fuz.su) Received: (from fuz@localhost) by fuz.su (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 08ALYCO8005077; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 23:34:12 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from fuz) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 23:34:12 +0200 From: Robert Clausecker To: Klaus Cucinauomo Cc: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Attempting to install on RPi4B w/ UEFI, having some problems Message-ID: <20200910213412.GA4706@fuz.su> References: <20200910201146.GA99827@fuz.su> <7022F32B-14F1-41D7-BDEA-71050AA16D0C@googlemail.com> <20200910212337.GA4139@fuz.su> <2B9C39C1-21CC-4422-849A-179D066618D8@googlemail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <2B9C39C1-21CC-4422-849A-179D066618D8@googlemail.com> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BnXFy1Q8Bz4gSG X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of fuz@fuz.su designates 2001:41d0:8:e508::1 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=fuz@fuz.su X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.84 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.999]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+a:c]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[fuz.su]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.002]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.54)[-0.537]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[googlemail.com]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:16276, ipnet:2001:41d0::/32, country:FR]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-arm] X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 21:34:14 -0000 Hi Klaus, I would like to stay with UEFI if possible, partially because I actually want to experiment with writing UEFI applications on this device. I can temporarily work around the genet issues using an external USB NIC and I suppose the mass-storage fixes would work with UEFI, too (you should really link them in the Wiki page). Thanks for your help! Yours, Robert Clausecker On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 11:29:22PM +0200, Klaus Cucinauomo wrote: > Hi Robert, > > > Am 10.09.2020 um 23:23 schrieb Robert Clausecker : > > > >> ….. > >> use the u-boot fdt -version where we have working genet and a working pcie-driver > >> (USB-mass-storage issues are fixed in : > >> https://reviews.freebsd.org/D26344 ) > > > > Cool! I'll try applying this patch and see if it helps. > > Requires a special u-boot-version /fdt ! > Details: https://wiki.freebsd.org/arm/Raspberry%20Pi > > thanks, > > Regards > > Klaus > > > -- () ascii ribbon campaign - for an 8-bit clean world /\ - against html email - against proprietary attachments From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Thu Sep 10 21:43:09 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8E993E4DE6 for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 21:43:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from maciphone2@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-wm1-x32c.google.com (mail-wm1-x32c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32c]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BnXSD3vJJz4gTx for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 21:43:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from maciphone2@googlemail.com) Received: by mail-wm1-x32c.google.com with SMTP id b79so2217156wmb.4 for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 14:43:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:mime-version:subject:date:references:to :in-reply-to:message-id; bh=U+KYOVTTT5G86TMYhIPQ5uxCgbbUyDfLwaE8hn7S+Is=; b=GRT/Qt2tulq5HCKrsviIb9OHfLLjC22uJt1fTA9y4Tqug6lX98nU4ghJN7Ml2Uivcm XqPWe3lVNCu40ZYKNVrqdDhbuODgpK+qITF45Cz/8mSal3C3eFZ2i6VXvEtcmPoKZXRa RPsX8ZWKYJjBi0HXRTamx3gZzRnQUa06g+NCb7aMhUhF1hagApSafIo0LC3GEKnBRgUU WM3AWyOZ/59JnUBNcl/j0fXbWB5jJTqgyQjxpHISdvDo/G48EPbyFonJrHakXjsLIw37 mRJGALDSz80scLzS1DBvicrL43Bzut+1d1kbTN3p7K8FegKkusxv31Kq2c/f4VLkcy1Q Obog== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532GP2chl+qup502S32/DwH5jlfbUyCye7MSxEXFAinRV7SovE1S E8UOh6eIJgIwnGnJdxwpt74= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzQVoYsOE0Kx3QG1NrdUOpWwQ3hPWY4SCcGi3eOrhi+YxCZcub7bAhBOC1pflrlWpTQA1GEKw== X-Received: by 2002:a7b:c751:: with SMTP id w17mr1935078wmk.97.1599774186951; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 14:43:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (x2e726b57.dyn.telefonica.de. [46.114.107.87]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id u126sm82860wmu.9.2020.09.10.14.43.05 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 10 Sep 2020 14:43:05 -0700 (PDT) From: Klaus Cucinauomo Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.0.3.2.26\)) Subject: Re: Attempting to install on RPi4B w/ UEFI, having some problems Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 23:43:04 +0200 References: <20200910201146.GA99827@fuz.su> <7022F32B-14F1-41D7-BDEA-71050AA16D0C@googlemail.com> <20200910212337.GA4139@fuz.su> <2B9C39C1-21CC-4422-849A-179D066618D8@googlemail.com> <20200910213412.GA4706@fuz.su> To: Robert Clausecker , freebsd-arm@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20200910213412.GA4706@fuz.su> Message-Id: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.0.3.2.26) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BnXSD3vJJz4gTx X-Spamd-Bar: -- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.45 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[googlemail.com]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a00:1450:4000::/36]; URI_COUNT_ODD(1.00)[1]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[googlemail.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[googlemail.com,quarantine]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-0.998]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[googlemail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2a00:1450::/32, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[googlemail.com:dkim]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.97)[-0.973]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[googlemail.com:s=20161025]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[46.114.107.87:received]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.97)[-0.974]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-arm@freebsd.org]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2a00:1450:4864:20::32c:from]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-arm] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.33 X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 21:43:10 -0000 > Am 10.09.2020 um 23:34 schrieb Robert Clausecker : >=20 > Hi Klaus, >=20 > I would like to stay with UEFI if possible, partially because I = actually > want to experiment with writing UEFI applications on this device. That=E2=80=99s great news! > I can > temporarily work around the genet issues using an external USB NIC and > I suppose the mass-storage fixes would work with UEFI, too (you should > really link them in the Wiki page). I=E2=80=99ve linked it yesterday onto to the top of Wiki-page = RPI4-issues: https://wiki.freebsd.org/arm/Raspberry%20Pi#RPI4 = As GregV correctly stated some minutes ago, pcie is not exposed to the = OS in UEFI, so that the patch in the pcie-driver will not do anything = in ACPI-mode in UEFI. Regards Klaus From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Thu Sep 10 23:25:44 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6B413E6FA8 for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 23:25:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marklmi@yahoo.com) Received: from sonic312-24.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (sonic312-24.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com [98.137.69.205]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BnZkZ6ZHjz4mhP for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 23:25:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marklmi@yahoo.com) X-YMail-OSG: btSj0KEVM1lRefhiVUv5gVnbXUvLBnz7kha_Ud9C36Z41gXouMgB30dF4KPynC. Y9szBUyzp7Tiup4MZoZYNbC1H_8yLuJOMBSygN64cTdMZSYXVdDQUjO_FZT_0JgsEP5btW_Dbpij tR9nmnIsAz2vyg1Wj7N3qgEagbw7xUMoBsEh4R_EjVyzSX7Nsx5XkzRiJ7YiV_6fdCgQjU_hBFRT KH6N1qUSPj4jWHkYC1PkZaEQqsWI5AxVBiCNys6NEgsiXgBeeplG1ZJ3EvH67XmRQm_3w7Ld4iNT mp9yxTh_VxBjb3YJ0NAAH.JE3FzaoIQ11g7O9ot1gzk2McNWrNtSUI3PZBrp3ZespIRQgH4g.3KP JhCjDAdCjrRci6DqYdbhOBI9o4HEhkTpDKKdIL93giX3nWa0P6oN69tFwNSK4CFAraM0OA5fQ42c t2Gj9TKjFJVBnPb2OJgEbNHyUnqCYRDuaGifpXugyGnkqsJQ33SRQSPwW.H_qHaZMj_AAqC8jde. sVuGCRStMTqHtUJyG8CJJQa5LFsdEa3rJ8Zo8Hd5BTzeEWAsLgQe1rEHzw_vpefUAlqUYHi9jQVE LwBPI2zZOEXhTqXhJCy0rtaUvHvaMtnuVLQJGSqOnHnrbWUcl5RVD_Adcl6DnZOPHM2X.ZqOBBYF ozPvRjKUr8OvNGhaLQDY.ToTQJ9ddJgspzInieDjBk_7vWTluTYIZ323lIEilJkIGv1Yj89r.EJ6 U_D.MLiLYwy7CkCKgdpGZhcGOaCJXrnQcbN1AVA22vzcpuDlkpOVKk6KaR8IVyvlDN1kus7l1yvL Cg.iAzZGFbOpOh8Nrkz8btYVxAAFc5IxsumG_Vpiq1H3mDbNdBKMa_mjZwwqNk_DqKhiwoiwxPby noN9PHIXxVj_vRhvFke5hmLpdhFOmBjX6.HlNBcQ.AatJepuhKt3rOBaNUQvn.hfW5MtQKRreuA0 sUVnjwxqX273pIbT9Gxw7aQae3n.G7k_B5lEK_hIRKwI46q5OmBOP0L9xQl7TM0aXrPFfm.JKhtn 4cpc4VcmZxSodmtQMOvc9Vbb7NT1ioqvAvbK6suoGTaA9VUcgMJKNc0D5kaW_5bLCnfsZvFtdwcF k34MLYR_xDykbz_6qfnoXS_5fYgigSMNRScHI6JeVKUv5jpgI8nvXuSLCIya5iojh.QmnVWbEGH8 NdrcypOt0LJlH3OItdmI16J7cAo7c.i4JP0dTJ7aeCnLhM3y.np0dhxqx0jsif_q6B0KtrwxMt3C 8w2ip5.anIP9pu7jvtCwj1ZWXHDj7fWx8LsNcfJRcmOJujs9d96aTo9q7VO8jGhGdAVsH1W.q9B_ 5rBYsAvX1oJPxQw7ZfI8mDgLE4OgEUBkzK1VGaiGRzj_1nzn0upFW5TArxDeYbeQZeQteeDu1MPJ djDYDOyURKbae_O007eYO3uvTPNLelA9.kpuUH4LRgAxbGnF7j2LFmMUOVm1Rn9TYSdqcvMjtNWY hIjgNaROpGTlnmCpI3SU9eh_kQDepQj1OaU.Mr9O_t2.A4.M4Uaoggx64k8BpmOz7rbkcDBIyRbw Ox5BkAoxIdUPgl5pZ6gR.BE_nwDEjGrJvbw-- Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic312.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with HTTP; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 23:25:40 +0000 Received: by smtp419.mail.ne1.yahoo.com (VZM Hermes SMTP Server) with ESMTPA ID 5c7fbdc8f6d2c8e9b237a809ea30f7ae; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 23:25:36 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.1\)) Subject: Re: Attempting to install on RPi4B w/ UEFI, having some problems From: Mark Millard In-Reply-To: <20200910201146.GA99827@fuz.su> Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 16:25:34 -0700 Cc: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <0E3AD53C-AA47-491B-B1C3-931C559CDC10@yahoo.com> References: <20200910201146.GA99827@fuz.su> To: Robert Clausecker X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.1) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BnZkZ6ZHjz4mhP X-Spamd-Bar: --- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.59 / 15.00]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[yahoo.com]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ptr:yahoo.com]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[yahoo.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[yahoo.com,reject]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.14)[-1.139]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[yahoo.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:36647, ipnet:98.137.64.0/20, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[yahoo.com:dkim]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.96)[-0.961]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[yahoo.com:s=s2048]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.99)[-0.992]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[98.137.69.205:from]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[98.137.69.205:from]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-arm] X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 23:25:44 -0000 On 2020-Sep-10, at 13:11, Robert Clausecker wrote: > Greetings! >=20 > I'm trying to install FreeBSD on a Raspberry Pi 4B w/ UEFI. >=20 > I've done the following: >=20 > * update the RPi4 firmware to support USb boot >=20 > * format a USB drive as follows >=20 > $ gpart show > =3D> 63 468862065 da0 MBR (224G) > 63 32768 1 efi (16M) > 32831 468829297 2 freebsd (224G) >=20 > =3D> 0 468829297 da0s2 BSD (224G) > 0 16777216 2 freebsd-swap (8.0G) > 16777216 452052081 1 freebsd-zfs (216G) FYI: I use GPT partitioning. (No claim that you need to.) Note: I'm running head -r363590 with various patches still. This could mean some of my claims are outdated on the FreeBSD side of ACPI based booting. > * make a dos file system for the efi partition and copy the uefi files = (most > recent version) in there >=20 > * make a ZFS pool and file systems as appropriate for a boot = environment I've not used ZFS in many years so I've no comments related to zfs. > * build CURRENT from source with D25201 manually applied (the other = patches > have apparently already been merged) and install it into the pool, = apply > basic configuration. The fstab says: >=20 > /dev/da0s1 /boot/efi msdos rw 0 0 > /dev/da0s2b none swap sw 0 0 >=20 > loader.conf says: >=20 > cryptodev_load=3D"YES" > zfs_load=3D"YES" >=20 > * copy loader.efi to /boot/efi/efi/boot/bootaa64.efi >=20 > * boot into uefi config menu, set console to serial, choose boot = device, > set up ACPI+DTB mode, disable memory limit To my knowledge FreeBSD makes no claim to be trying to support ACPI+DTB. I use ACPI for UEFI based booting (no DTB). > * kernel boots fine into login shell but reports no DTB found. I'm not surprised. > Some things don't seem to work correctly: >=20 > * if I plug the USB drive into a USB 3.0 port, everything works fine = until > root is mounted. At that point, every further disk access fails with = IO > errors: >=20 > (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): READ(10). CDB: 28 00 01 80 a0 c1 00 00 07 00=20= > (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): CAM status: CCB request completed with an = error > (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): Retrying command, 3 more tries remain >=20 > This can be worked around using >=20 > * a genet ethernet device does not seem to exist and consequentially, > no network connection can be established. FreeBSD does not yet support the built-in Ethernet via ACPI booting. I use a USB3 Ethernet device instead. > * pciconf -l yields no PCI devices and dmesg suggests no pci bus was > detected (grepping for pci yields no results) The ACPI exposure of the XHCI does not present it as a PCIe device. ACPI does not present the PCIe at all. (Or that is my understanding.) I boot via a USB3 SSD, no microsd card involved. FreeBSD does not yet support the microsd card slot via ACPI based booting. I use a USB based reader/writer if I want to use a microsd card for something. > * if I select DTB-only mode in the UEFI configuration, the kernel = hangs > during boot. In any case it complains about not having received a = DTB. The only mode of using the UEFI/ACPI software is ACPI mode, no DTB at all. FreeBSD has a port for u-boot/DTB based but it and UEFI/DTB do no match. > What can I do to fix these problems? Is there anything I missed? >=20 You are trying in-development software that is incomplete and has known problems. The UEFI/ACPI and u-boot alternatives have differing = tradeoffs, including in what devices are supported. =3D=3D=3D Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away in early 2018-Mar) From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Fri Sep 11 11:42:19 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 614173D6547 for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 11:42:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fuz@fuz.su) Received: from fuz.su (fuz.su [IPv6:2001:41d0:8:e508::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "amnesiac", Issuer "amnesiac" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Bnv4V487Jz4DJN for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 11:42:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fuz@fuz.su) Received: from fuz.su (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fuz.su (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 08BBgFEr057040 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 11 Sep 2020 13:42:15 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from fuz@fuz.su) Received: (from fuz@localhost) by fuz.su (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 08BBgEIo057039; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 13:42:14 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from fuz) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 13:42:14 +0200 From: Robert Clausecker To: Mark Millard Cc: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Attempting to install on RPi4B w/ UEFI, having some problems Message-ID: <20200911114214.GA56507@fuz.su> References: <20200910201146.GA99827@fuz.su> <0E3AD53C-AA47-491B-B1C3-931C559CDC10@yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <0E3AD53C-AA47-491B-B1C3-931C559CDC10@yahoo.com> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Bnv4V487Jz4DJN X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of fuz@fuz.su designates 2001:41d0:8:e508::1 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=fuz@fuz.su X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.66 / 15.00]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+a]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.003]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[fuz.su]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.999]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.36)[-0.356]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[yahoo.com]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:16276, ipnet:2001:41d0::/32, country:FR]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-arm] X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 11:42:19 -0000 Hi Mark, On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 04:25:34PM -0700, Mark Millard wrote: > > > On 2020-Sep-10, at 13:11, Robert Clausecker wrote: > > > Greetings! > > > > I'm trying to install FreeBSD on a Raspberry Pi 4B w/ UEFI. > > > > I've done the following: > > > > * update the RPi4 firmware to support USb boot > > > > * format a USB drive as follows > > > > $ gpart show > > => 63 468862065 da0 MBR (224G) > > 63 32768 1 efi (16M) > > 32831 468829297 2 freebsd (224G) > > > > => 0 468829297 da0s2 BSD (224G) > > 0 16777216 2 freebsd-swap (8.0G) > > 16777216 452052081 1 freebsd-zfs (216G) > > FYI: I use GPT partitioning. (No claim that you need to.) Ah, good to know that that works. I was afraid the UEFI code required an MBR scheme as the documentation indicated such. > Note: I'm running head -r363590 with various patches still. > This could mean some of my claims are outdated on the > FreeBSD side of ACPI based booting. > > > * make a dos file system for the efi partition and copy the uefi files (most > > recent version) in there > > > > * make a ZFS pool and file systems as appropriate for a boot environment > > I've not used ZFS in many years so I've no comments related to zfs. > > > * build CURRENT from source with D25201 manually applied (the other patches > > have apparently already been merged) and install it into the pool, apply > > basic configuration. The fstab says: > > > > /dev/da0s1 /boot/efi msdos rw 0 0 > > /dev/da0s2b none swap sw 0 0 > > > > loader.conf says: > > > > cryptodev_load="YES" > > zfs_load="YES" > > > > * copy loader.efi to /boot/efi/efi/boot/bootaa64.efi > > > > * boot into uefi config menu, set console to serial, choose boot device, > > set up ACPI+DTB mode, disable memory limit > > To my knowledge FreeBSD makes no claim to be trying to > support ACPI+DTB. I use ACPI for UEFI based booting (no DTB). The Wiki page (arm/Raspberry Pi) does say explicitly: > RPI4-UEFI, allows us to triple-boot FreeBSD on the RPi4 from either > Device Tree or ACPI or ACPI&Device-tree(both). But it appears that loading the DTB from the UEFI boot loader is not supported at all. In fact, when I configure UEFI to generate a DTB only (ACPI off), the kernel hangs during boot. > > * kernel boots fine into login shell but reports no DTB found. > > I'm not surprised. > > > Some things don't seem to work correctly: > > > > * if I plug the USB drive into a USB 3.0 port, everything works fine until > > root is mounted. At that point, every further disk access fails with IO > > errors: > > > > (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): READ(10). CDB: 28 00 01 80 a0 c1 00 00 07 00 > > (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): CAM status: CCB request completed with an error > > (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): Retrying command, 3 more tries remain > > > > This can be worked around using > > > > * a genet ethernet device does not seem to exist and consequentially, > > no network connection can be established. > > FreeBSD does not yet support the built-in Ethernet via ACPI booting. > I use a USB3 Ethernet device instead. Thanks, will use a USB ethernet dongle as a stop gap solution. > > * pciconf -l yields no PCI devices and dmesg suggests no pci bus was > > detected (grepping for pci yields no results) > > The ACPI exposure of the XHCI does not present it as a PCIe device. > ACPI does not present the PCIe at all. (Or that is my understanding.) > > I boot via a USB3 SSD, no microsd card involved. No SD card involved in my set up either. > FreeBSD does not yet support the microsd card slot via ACPI based > booting. I use a USB based reader/writer if I want to use a > microsd card for something. > > > * if I select DTB-only mode in the UEFI configuration, the kernel hangs > > during boot. In any case it complains about not having received a DTB. > > The only mode of using the UEFI/ACPI software is ACPI mode, no DTB at > all. FreeBSD has a port for u-boot/DTB based but it and UEFI/DTB do no > match. > > > What can I do to fix these problems? Is there anything I missed? > > > > You are trying in-development software that is incomplete and has known > problems. The UEFI/ACPI and u-boot alternatives have differing tradeoffs, > including in what devices are supported. Sure. I though that perhaps I had missed some patch or something. If it's just not in the code yet, that's fine. I'll wait for support to arrive. > === > Mark Millard > marklmi at yahoo.com > ( dsl-only.net went > away in early 2018-Mar) Yours, Robert Clausecker -- () ascii ribbon campaign - for an 8-bit clean world /\ - against html email - against proprietary attachments From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Fri Sep 11 13:56:16 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 318203DAF4B for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 13:56:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from greg@unrelenting.technology) Received: from out0.migadu.com (out0.migadu.com [IPv6:2001:41d0:2:267::]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Bny3254F3z4N41 for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 13:56:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from greg@unrelenting.technology) MIME-Version: 1.0 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=unrelenting.technology; s=default; t=1599832571; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=pwkp2kWPgUMzvMX3yRXw8CnSf9Xm2ElqqGpElPMKUmA=; b=NQIM0cLP/flRm2ECriLwFY9Nof8u7S80RDgJ/jCiM0ddMVFOV02iAtHZRt2IZAAA+vOmpR U2/w8IWrcgtzdk7vxFUZRw5t0wd28k/Dl8aCKHAcKUk5WA58pgQ+p1u3sxlDMDt6TUqdzm AopVq6DgzW0YkjOFgaIelcVVeiXJ4eQ= Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 13:56:10 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. From: greg@unrelenting.technology Message-ID: <5a89c2a07da75b2f1bcbdae9741982cc@unrelenting.technology> Subject: Re: Attempting to install on RPi4B w/ UEFI, having some problems To: "Robert Clausecker" , "Mark Millard" Cc: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20200911114214.GA56507@fuz.su> References: <20200911114214.GA56507@fuz.su> <20200910201146.GA99827@fuz.su> <0E3AD53C-AA47-491B-B1C3-931C559CDC10@yahoo.com> X-Spam-Score: -0.10 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Bny3254F3z4N41 X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=unrelenting.technology header.s=default header.b=NQIM0cLP; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=unrelenting.technology; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of greg@unrelenting.technology designates 2001:41d0:2:267:: as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=greg@unrelenting.technology X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.91 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.98)[-0.981]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[unrelenting.technology:s=default]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2001:41d0:2:267::]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[unrelenting.technology:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[unrelenting.technology,none]; FROM_NO_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.93)[-0.932]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[fuz.su,yahoo.com]; RCVD_COUNT_ZERO(0.00)[0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:16276, ipnet:2001:41d0::/32, country:FR]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-arm] X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 13:56:16 -0000 September 11, 2020 2:42 PM, "Robert Clausecker" wrote:=0A=0A= >> On 2020-Sep-10, at 13:11, Robert Clausecker wrote:=0A>= > FYI: I use GPT partitioning. (No claim that you need to.)=0A> =0A> Ah, = good to know that that works. I was afraid the UEFI code=0A> required an = MBR scheme as the documentation indicated such.=0A=0AEDK2 UEFI not suppor= ting GPT would be *very* weird.=0AI'm pretty sure the documentation was r= eferring to the RPi early firmware.=0A=0AMaybe the update that added pure= -USB boot added GPT support there as well!=0A=0A> But it appears that loa= ding the DTB from the UEFI boot loader is not=0A> supported at all. In fa= ct, when I configure UEFI to generate a DTB=0A> only (ACPI off), the kern= el hangs during boot.=0A=0AWell that might be a FreeBSD side problem. From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Fri Sep 11 14:01:25 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E88B3DB797 for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 14:01:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fuz@fuz.su) Received: from fuz.su (fuz.su [IPv6:2001:41d0:8:e508::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "amnesiac", Issuer "amnesiac" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Bny900rb8z4NL2 for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 14:01:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fuz@fuz.su) Received: from fuz.su (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fuz.su (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 08BE1LYZ065384 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 11 Sep 2020 16:01:21 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from fuz@fuz.su) Received: (from fuz@localhost) by fuz.su (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 08BE1LXP065383; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 16:01:21 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from fuz) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 16:01:21 +0200 From: Robert Clausecker To: greg@unrelenting.technology Cc: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Attempting to install on RPi4B w/ UEFI, having some problems Message-ID: <20200911140121.GA65117@fuz.su> References: <20200911114214.GA56507@fuz.su> <20200910201146.GA99827@fuz.su> <0E3AD53C-AA47-491B-B1C3-931C559CDC10@yahoo.com> <5a89c2a07da75b2f1bcbdae9741982cc@unrelenting.technology> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5a89c2a07da75b2f1bcbdae9741982cc@unrelenting.technology> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Bny900rb8z4NL2 X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of fuz@fuz.su designates 2001:41d0:8:e508::1 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=fuz@fuz.su X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.24 / 15.00]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.02)[-1.022]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+a]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.02)[-1.015]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[fuz.su]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.10)[0.101]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:16276, ipnet:2001:41d0::/32, country:FR]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-arm]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 14:01:25 -0000 On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 01:56:10PM +0000, greg@unrelenting.technology wrote: > September 11, 2020 2:42 PM, "Robert Clausecker" wrote: > > >> On 2020-Sep-10, at 13:11, Robert Clausecker wrote: > >> FYI: I use GPT partitioning. (No claim that you need to.) > > > > Ah, good to know that that works. I was afraid the UEFI code > > required an MBR scheme as the documentation indicated such. > > EDK2 UEFI not supporting GPT would be *very* weird. > I'm pretty sure the documentation was referring to the RPi early firmware. Possible. I may check this later tonight. The main thing is that the RPi4 firmware must be able to load UEFI's start4.elf from the EFI partition within a GPT partition table. Not sure if it can do that. > Maybe the update that added pure-USB boot added GPT support there as well! > > > But it appears that loading the DTB from the UEFI boot loader is not > > supported at all. In fact, when I configure UEFI to generate a DTB > > only (ACPI off), the kernel hangs during boot. > > Well that might be a FreeBSD side problem. Possibly. I'm not entirely sure if it's really a kernel hang; some other users suggested it might just be the kernel switching from serial console to video output for the system console (it does stay at the serial console when using ACPI). I can't really tell as I don't have a way to attach a screen ATM. Any idea about debugging this further? Yours, Robert Clausecker -- () ascii ribbon campaign - for an 8-bit clean world /\ - against html email - against proprietary attachments From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Fri Sep 11 14:49:19 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB7833DD440 for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 14:49:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from crowston@protonmail.com) Received: from mail2.protonmail.ch (mail2.protonmail.ch [185.70.40.22]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "protonmail.com", Issuer "SwissSign Server Gold CA 2014 - G22" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BnzDG4vBlz4S74 for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 14:49:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from crowston@protonmail.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 14:49:05 +0000 To: Robert Clausecker , greg@unrelenting.technology From: Robert Crowston Cc: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Reply-To: Robert Crowston Subject: Re: Attempting to install on RPi4B w/ UEFI, having some problems Message-ID: <2Qbg-9sDFvsMbwbG1Buku3juoB89Qyn_XtbdpxhJrc6hCQIQ5sp5KB-wVyZJRdRS1629yOQ4m9jHvGUnYhYv7M8-_nIA-eoRdn3-E4nhuo0=@protonmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20200911140121.GA65117@fuz.su> References: <20200911114214.GA56507@fuz.su> <20200910201146.GA99827@fuz.su> <0E3AD53C-AA47-491B-B1C3-931C559CDC10@yahoo.com> <5a89c2a07da75b2f1bcbdae9741982cc@unrelenting.technology> <20200911140121.GA65117@fuz.su> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE shortcircuit=no autolearn=disabled version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on mailout.protonmail.ch X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BnzDG4vBlz4S74 X-Spamd-Bar: --- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.97 / 15.00]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[crowston@protonmail.com]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[protonmail.com]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:185.70.40.0/24]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[protonmail.com:+]; MIME_BASE64_TEXT(0.10)[]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[protonmail.com,quarantine]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.11)[-1.107]; RCVD_COUNT_ZERO(0.00)[0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[protonmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:62371, ipnet:185.70.40.0/24, country:CH]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.98)[-0.981]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[protonmail.com:s=protonmail]; REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.98)[-0.981]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; FREEMAIL_REPLYTO(0.00)[protonmail.com]; HAS_PHPMAILER_SIG(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[185.70.40.22:from]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[185.70.40.22:from]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-arm] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.33 X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 14:49:19 -0000 PiBpdCBtaWdodCBqdXN0IGJlIHRoZSBrZXJuZWwgc3dpdGNoaW5nIGZyb20gc2VyaWFsIGNvbnNv bGUgdG8gdmlkZW8gb3V0cHV0IGZvciB0aGUgc3lzdGVtIGNvbnNvbGUKClRoZXJlIGlzIGEgYm9v dCBmbGFnLCAtRCBJIHRoaW5rLCBmb3IgZm9yY2luZyBkdWFsIG91dHB1dCB0byB2aWRlbyArIHNl cmlhbC4KCj4gQW55IGlkZWEgYWJvdXQgZGVidWdnaW5nIHRoaXMgZnVydGhlcj8KCk15IGFkdmlj ZSBmb3IgdGhpcyBraW5kIG9mIHByb2JsZW06IGdldCBhIEpUQUcuIENhbiBiZSB5b3VycyBmb3Ig MjUgVVNEIGFuZCB3aWxsIGdpdmUgeW91IGEgZGVidWdnZXIgYXQgdGhlIGhhcmR3YXJlIGxldmVs IChzaW5nbGUgc3RlcCBpbnN0cnVjdGlvbnMsIGluc3BlY3Rpb24gb2YgbWVtb3J5IGFkZHJlc3Nl cywgc2V0dGluZyBicmVha3BvaW50cyBldGMpLiBCaXQgdGltZSBjb25zdW1pbmcgdG8gc2V0IHVw IHRob3VnaC4KCuKAlCBSSEMuCgpPbiBGcmksIFNlcCAxMSwgMjAyMCBhdCAxNTowMSwgUm9iZXJ0 IENsYXVzZWNrZXIgPGZ1ekBmdXouc3U+IHdyb3RlOgoKPiBPbiBGcmksIFNlcCAxMSwgMjAyMCBh dCAwMTo1NjoxMFBNICswMDAwLCBncmVnQHVucmVsZW50aW5nLnRlY2hub2xvZ3kgd3JvdGU6Cj4+ IFNlcHRlbWJlciAxMSwgMjAyMCAyOjQyIFBNLCAiUm9iZXJ0IENsYXVzZWNrZXIiIDxmdXpAZnV6 LnN1PiB3cm90ZToKPj4KPj4gPj4gT24gMjAyMC1TZXAtMTAsIGF0IDEzOjExLCBSb2JlcnQgQ2xh dXNlY2tlciA8ZnV6IGF0IGZ1ei5zdT4gd3JvdGU6Cj4+ID4+IEZZSTogSSB1c2UgR1BUIHBhcnRp dGlvbmluZy4gKE5vIGNsYWltIHRoYXQgeW91IG5lZWQgdG8uKQo+PiA+Cj4+ID4gQWgsIGdvb2Qg dG8ga25vdyB0aGF0IHRoYXQgd29ya3MuIEkgd2FzIGFmcmFpZCB0aGUgVUVGSSBjb2RlCj4+ID4g cmVxdWlyZWQgYW4gTUJSIHNjaGVtZSBhcyB0aGUgZG9jdW1lbnRhdGlvbiBpbmRpY2F0ZWQgc3Vj aC4KPj4KPj4gRURLMiBVRUZJIG5vdCBzdXBwb3J0aW5nIEdQVCB3b3VsZCBiZSAqdmVyeSogd2Vp cmQuCj4+IEknbSBwcmV0dHkgc3VyZSB0aGUgZG9jdW1lbnRhdGlvbiB3YXMgcmVmZXJyaW5nIHRv IHRoZSBSUGkgZWFybHkgZmlybXdhcmUuCj4KPiBQb3NzaWJsZS4gSSBtYXkgY2hlY2sgdGhpcyBs YXRlciB0b25pZ2h0LiBUaGUgbWFpbiB0aGluZyBpcyB0aGF0IHRoZQo+IFJQaTQgZmlybXdhcmUg bXVzdCBiZSBhYmxlIHRvIGxvYWQgVUVGSSdzIHN0YXJ0NC5lbGYgZnJvbSB0aGUgRUZJIHBhcnRp dGlvbgo+IHdpdGhpbiBhIEdQVCBwYXJ0aXRpb24gdGFibGUuIE5vdCBzdXJlIGlmIGl0IGNhbiBk byB0aGF0Lgo+Cj4+IE1heWJlIHRoZSB1cGRhdGUgdGhhdCBhZGRlZCBwdXJlLVVTQiBib290IGFk ZGVkIEdQVCBzdXBwb3J0IHRoZXJlIGFzIHdlbGwhCj4+Cj4+ID4gQnV0IGl0IGFwcGVhcnMgdGhh dCBsb2FkaW5nIHRoZSBEVEIgZnJvbSB0aGUgVUVGSSBib290IGxvYWRlciBpcyBub3QKPj4gPiBz dXBwb3J0ZWQgYXQgYWxsLiBJbiBmYWN0LCB3aGVuIEkgY29uZmlndXJlIFVFRkkgdG8gZ2VuZXJh dGUgYSBEVEIKPj4gPiBvbmx5IChBQ1BJIG9mZiksIHRoZSBrZXJuZWwgaGFuZ3MgZHVyaW5nIGJv b3QuCj4+Cj4+IFdlbGwgdGhhdCBtaWdodCBiZSBhIEZyZWVCU0Qgc2lkZSBwcm9ibGVtLgo+Cj4g UG9zc2libHkuIEknbSBub3QgZW50aXJlbHkgc3VyZSBpZiBpdCdzIHJlYWxseSBhIGtlcm5lbCBo YW5nOyBzb21lIG90aGVyCj4gdXNlcnMgc3VnZ2VzdGVkIGl0IG1pZ2h0IGp1c3QgYmUgdGhlIGtl cm5lbCBzd2l0Y2hpbmcgZnJvbSBzZXJpYWwgY29uc29sZSB0bwo+IHZpZGVvIG91dHB1dCBmb3Ig dGhlIHN5c3RlbSBjb25zb2xlIChpdCBkb2VzIHN0YXkgYXQgdGhlIHNlcmlhbCBjb25zb2xlIHdo ZW4KPiB1c2luZyBBQ1BJKS4gSSBjYW4ndCByZWFsbHkgdGVsbCBhcyBJIGRvbid0IGhhdmUgYSB3 YXkgdG8gYXR0YWNoIGEgc2NyZWVuCj4gQVRNLiBBbnkgaWRlYSBhYm91dCBkZWJ1Z2dpbmcgdGhp cyBmdXJ0aGVyPwo+Cj4gWW91cnMsCj4gUm9iZXJ0IENsYXVzZWNrZXIKPgo+IC0tCj4gKCkgYXNj aWkgcmliYm9uIGNhbXBhaWduIC0gZm9yIGFuIDgtYml0IGNsZWFuIHdvcmxkCj4gL1wgLSBhZ2Fp bnN0IGh0bWwgZW1haWwgLSBhZ2FpbnN0IHByb3ByaWV0YXJ5IGF0dGFjaG1lbnRzCj4gX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18KPiBmcmVlYnNkLWFybUBm cmVlYnNkLm9yZyBtYWlsaW5nIGxpc3QKPiBodHRwczovL2xpc3RzLmZyZWVic2Qub3JnL21haWxt YW4vbGlzdGluZm8vZnJlZWJzZC1hcm0KPiBUbyB1bnN1YnNjcmliZSwgc2VuZCBhbnkgbWFpbCB0 byAiZnJlZWJzZC1hcm0tdW5zdWJzY3JpYmVAZnJlZWJzZC5vcmci From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Fri Sep 11 18:11:44 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EB743E1F69 for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 18:11:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wlosh@bsdimp.com) Received: from mail-qt1-x833.google.com (mail-qt1-x833.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::833]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Bp3jq4h1wz4ft1 for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 18:11:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wlosh@bsdimp.com) Received: by mail-qt1-x833.google.com with SMTP id k25so8604559qtu.4 for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 11:11:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bsdimp-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=GXyH4rEUXAtq55uYrI6DF1uHSEWj4Fj6hg28qE0rCwU=; b=Pl5YlvPdZpzN5bEpvBIacMvtOdI6Ylde3CmazPdSGUtq2+V5+7Kc119iB5/Wsvsz8y ou/HasKr0C62YIzz80G2dzY7Gl/3CscvMci0NDxS8w7X7ZGp+AQurzl2dSLWwnen/AFj zElBUOobIMVrYrak02xtI9GddVpJE4aiWx5yZrW8ZmbE01Cica8IySeiSWkB6HgGq8av 1JHKsyqFLnzaaEG72JFT7TxVLDo4fYoRie+q4T0rmangm+ia0pAnwKHgifYsVuQgo9zI 1rfHbXfP3kpXE5pDY+Lmu7/f/oNz8pMAitLijGVOzl4kV14bUN6mXCx1MvVVV2kvnCSO MANw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=GXyH4rEUXAtq55uYrI6DF1uHSEWj4Fj6hg28qE0rCwU=; b=OJDV8Y4iW+aVsasNqai3Oer5mZJfDqMqD7xtyK41NCsoIKtjHq/Gk0Gco2R50j0Fk3 WDckJO773NFIoJl22RKqtN3DA81foBa/R8MDoja7PlPBCaJLUZmjMGR8q7IkeTKkY227 QczBxswzbbU7mjpBZ2BeT/8iuQzlwDm+Gjgg2eL0jVT8WOunn1rYQxqQRm9aTT1IBIVd jObq+DNT/PxN43tRbn+iX6WTdeMnuR7PLvHNKCJvl/midp/0d9Hma6kmg8xlCDmoKiiQ knnrw+ZdlS+EgUR/mpwprB08smC1WpdOU6kS2o7w1SJ1StWeVw9ytgOBMutIzLzSXSvO RYPg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532GFU51c/XUs0MR/5Y+rLoBpHxps9/yzsPiEtnyJ4R9+q0KSntR PHM8hpIA4JM0DFAmMeOQPJDdlegwt0vO/7ltvsh3Ic+qlzvNXg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzppf3rjbI7zGaDAJMMcuGKpKoT7i8dte2Q1mpC4dFD71lbHbw/TCupTenXt9JAKHp33ry48ES2ZJoh8GmJpmM= X-Received: by 2002:ac8:4548:: with SMTP id z8mr3158487qtn.291.1599847902911; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 11:11:42 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200910201146.GA99827@fuz.su> <0E3AD53C-AA47-491B-B1C3-931C559CDC10@yahoo.com> <20200911114214.GA56507@fuz.su> <5a89c2a07da75b2f1bcbdae9741982cc@unrelenting.technology> In-Reply-To: <5a89c2a07da75b2f1bcbdae9741982cc@unrelenting.technology> From: Warner Losh Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 12:11:32 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Attempting to install on RPi4B w/ UEFI, having some problems To: Greg V Cc: Robert Clausecker , Mark Millard , "freebsd-arm@freebsd.org" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Bp3jq4h1wz4ft1 X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=bsdimp-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=Pl5YlvPd; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of wlosh@bsdimp.com has no SPF policy when checking 2607:f8b0:4864:20::833) smtp.mailfrom=wlosh@bsdimp.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.42 / 15.00]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_SOME(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_CC(0.00)[fuz.su,yahoo.com,freebsd.org]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.97)[-0.970]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-arm@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[bsdimp.com]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[bsdimp-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com:s=20150623]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[bsdimp-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com:+]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.47)[-0.467]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::833:from]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.98)[-0.978]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[imp@bsdimp.com,wlosh@bsdimp.com]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[imp@bsdimp.com,wlosh@bsdimp.com]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-arm] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.33 X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 18:11:44 -0000 On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 7:56 AM wrote: > September 11, 2020 2:42 PM, "Robert Clausecker" wrote: > > >> On 2020-Sep-10, at 13:11, Robert Clausecker wrote: > >> FYI: I use GPT partitioning. (No claim that you need to.) > > > > Ah, good to know that that works. I was afraid the UEFI code > > required an MBR scheme as the documentation indicated such. > > EDK2 UEFI not supporting GPT would be *very* weird. > I'm pretty sure the documentation was referring to the RPi early firmware. > In EDK2, both seem to be support well. If anything, the FreeBSD UEFI code supports GPT better than MBR. It's certainly better tested. Warner From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Fri Sep 11 18:25:07 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4B2F3E2588 for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 18:25:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marklmi@yahoo.com) Received: from sonic307-55.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (sonic307-55.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com [98.137.64.31]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Bp41G6M91z3RQm for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 18:25:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marklmi@yahoo.com) X-YMail-OSG: YyEvsnAVM1mbGyojUYGUegnbGfcvuHMxERJFTbFN8WrepYDTHuF45B6S0x4TvS6 dF4njdD1OIjCcrZ_qd1_BPzr_Mc192KzNxYjvWWEsYCsfS7vtN0jE7d8RJ1uYjpmoK8nTEmGGOXt aXCFPI6uonPmTLTTEy3xlAEQ76GkIJ1y6Nq03NE0eHVrs.M3dgm_U0zEJu4LUALqbeCHP.KjHRTF aY207Li_IdhiCq6fGKsWJaq3lRMwLm3ob8gp05.UfLWJgEc_9Dr341zW28QlJcY1zhiPT0gNTeib c05WNjhCYKdmpvtB53zxBNoFlDQzDVXRAe1wUSQM_QxHri1i_wm5G6FIA5NhHOJ0kk3eWV6f99Qc c9Qfp8H91ZBcPg7rsbugaHQJ_2EJj5A3imd1jjj.pHUr9AzwPuWCxuvM0hU8QMXgZQm7nUcaJO58 BCjafIULwIo7fItKzvXE2S1XqnL.9k44_2AO6xuQdqO_JffxMVvFiFuAo4paAOZP9jY8rRnU7EAK Zq30k874hbhx33RoukrJFw083jg0sRIQda.dDcaSDlc__z1r__WMzv85HAWn3u1WZnrj0LxXYDsh .W30jSB6Kd9jYWER6A8glPvfhZ6UZ0bWN3S8c6GoybXvPxUj2t9TBU9ir2dZhYze3OSDkzHvY.P6 Fpjr5h4fECuramnKYDieBIZ6Lt_.iORaZWeXbvPGmukipcoxrxvEAva5dMKSVWdcoACZFbZH9S1Q Jxg6rUhsydrUo24GDMyNxoWlHMTRO58Hs2WTd.AZwtp1i5b.qUyPYOF0bPYOR_j3W0RGDeZhLD8j netaIpnNDmmfT.r_hhoYior5zuv7NgPQWIFqCrARoNZyl1d7EzHAhiC6vcA3kh9oU4by4r5a01m. DiXobLXSIcdSPgcEQhgojwfWhFsR27AiFmIydYaQ61nve1teWNR4YLdBEGoE7WnkcfHsw4UDxPs5 j7lYPcCeCBYn9LkOr8v.n.nyVvh7k3KpNo5u4VxDXxvmCr_QSSXF9L841EBRrySFAMl4DICO94VL bUtWZOS0kBPxUuLQYe08IZZoa.RmGni7KKBWtBZMLl57U96bK7lGNz_PMqA3dpaKG6i2Pf9Xki79 OBrcoM_NlbNjmrF6JQ.nKLKHqGOz5pE.moAo7Vz0nsZv16hwJTx0iGqXlIbMOZsJjn6cWcYyr0za weYlodTshht9npDssA2r3KomDFAUicmt3YGXqfK6RXekDCvwkue5LGIBjm9NSaQYPDGwNfYtGxWE tViirSHsxTA7ZzngHVzX4MTagaDt3NPvzYWr9gFfpfotHckGc0cAj_X15GXFkLtjU3K9cxVpR2qC RJ81U5B5VEZEyhrYS.DwiD_6RpOFbPKPi3ZSD5N948BtPIPZi4VJyzvllimpAJoSfHDXBcL6lB0I hq3nH77wETM8GY.NVpo.MVU2mmE0X_sBB4BP0XjqJTzhFMwviJfIsWMLIVcQq0rR.PaGmNblr_ij dJvJXYkwuQkZXGM_Jk5fMGobPFWRUWg2BHajTHXuhq76Gx1em8yJdkNUnmGYJSm6Mda6bPKU4 Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic307.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with HTTP; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 18:25:05 +0000 Received: by smtp419.mail.bf1.yahoo.com (VZM Hermes SMTP Server) with ESMTPA ID 50dbd04884c2467e0270a0ebecf2ad61; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 18:25:02 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.1\)) Subject: Re: Attempting to install on RPi4B w/ UEFI, having some problems From: Mark Millard In-Reply-To: <20200911114214.GA56507@fuz.su> Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 11:25:00 -0700 Cc: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <9E14D44F-2F16-486E-ACFB-EC189A345D5B@yahoo.com> References: <20200910201146.GA99827@fuz.su> <0E3AD53C-AA47-491B-B1C3-931C559CDC10@yahoo.com> <20200911114214.GA56507@fuz.su> To: Robert Clausecker X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.1) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Bp41G6M91z3RQm X-Spamd-Bar: --- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.28 / 15.00]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[yahoo.com]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ptr:yahoo.com]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[yahoo.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[yahoo.com,reject]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.80)[-0.802]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[yahoo.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:36647, ipnet:98.137.64.0/20, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[yahoo.com:dkim]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.98)[-0.981]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[yahoo.com:s=s2048]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.99)[-0.992]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[98.137.64.31:from]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[98.137.64.31:from]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-arm] X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 18:25:08 -0000 > On 2020-Sep-11, at 04:42, Robert Clausecker wrote: >=20 > Hi Mark, >=20 > On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 04:25:34PM -0700, Mark Millard wrote: >>=20 >>=20 >> On 2020-Sep-10, at 13:11, Robert Clausecker wrote: >>=20 >>> Greetings! >>>=20 >>> I'm trying to install FreeBSD on a Raspberry Pi 4B w/ UEFI. >>>=20 >>> I've done the following: >>>=20 >>> * update the RPi4 firmware to support USb boot >>>=20 >>> * format a USB drive as follows >>>=20 >>> $ gpart show >>> =3D> 63 468862065 da0 MBR (224G) >>> 63 32768 1 efi (16M) >>> 32831 468829297 2 freebsd (224G) >>>=20 >>> =3D> 0 468829297 da0s2 BSD (224G) >>> 0 16777216 2 freebsd-swap (8.0G) >>> 16777216 452052081 1 freebsd-zfs (216G) >>=20 >> FYI: I use GPT partitioning. (No claim that you need to.) >=20 > Ah, good to know that that works. I was afraid the UEFI code > required an MBR scheme as the documentation indicated such. The constraint was Raspberry pi firmware stages before uefi is involved. Modern enough Raspberry pi firmware supports GPT at those early stages. # gpart show -p =3D> 40 468862048 da0 GPT (224G) 40 2008 - free - (1.0M) 2048 413138944 da0p1 freebsd-ufs (197G) 413140992 9437184 da0p2 freebsd-swap (4.5G) 422578176 204800 da0p3 ms-basic-data (100M) 422782976 46079112 - free - (22G) >>> . . . >>>=20 >>> * boot into uefi config menu, set console to serial, choose boot = device, >>> set up ACPI+DTB mode, disable memory limit >>=20 >> To my knowledge FreeBSD makes no claim to be trying to >> support ACPI+DTB. I use ACPI for UEFI based booting (no DTB). >=20 > The Wiki page (arm/Raspberry Pi) does say explicitly: >=20 >> RPI4-UEFI, allows us to triple-boot FreeBSD on the RPi4 from either >> Device Tree or ACPI or ACPI&Device-tree(both).=20 Ahh. I do not expect that the Wiki is being maintained by someone involved in implementing such things. So somewhat more guess work is involved in the WIki's production.=20 > But it appears that loading the DTB from the UEFI boot loader is not > supported at all. In fact, when I configure UEFI to generate a DTB > only (ACPI off), the kernel hangs during boot. I'm not sure anyone has examined the content of the DTB produced by the UEFI software. If not, then no one knows what would be required to support it vs. the u-boot port's DTB and what the u-boot port initializes before FreeBSD is involved. >>> . . . >>>=20 >>> * a genet ethernet device does not seem to exist and = consequentially, >>> no network connection can be established. >>=20 >> FreeBSD does not yet support the built-in Ethernet via ACPI booting. >> I use a USB3 Ethernet device instead. >=20 > Thanks, will use a USB ethernet dongle as a stop gap solution. I get Gbit-ballpark speeds from: ugen0.3: at usbus0 ure0: = on usbus0 But that is based on a patch from a review. I'm unsure if a more modern FreeBSD has the patch applied already. =3D=3D=3D Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away in early 2018-Mar) From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Fri Sep 11 21:14:41 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDE833E6C25 for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 21:14:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from maciphone2@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-wm1-x342.google.com (mail-wm1-x342.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::342]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Bp7mx0N5Qz3cvv for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 21:14:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from maciphone2@googlemail.com) Received: by mail-wm1-x342.google.com with SMTP id s13so5584702wmh.4 for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 14:14:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :subject:date:references:to:in-reply-to:message-id; bh=QN7x6PGY8JHxBiPvEuvvldKm0MewTiwiLP/joOdxHiA=; b=lHDcnv/WapseXje2CT7q++225CvXWUhXNhYooEW7E9/OzEvL3kM5Hx2iinuc0mZ60c mIY2kwJNhpC2Lv01r7G0k9w3YAqYCCOpOd7rj3TdOwlRNGoab7k+dMqbpgz2z3LoqcYc Bxt9fk1Jip+AyLJAagrB/6YfWUmVf85OHdrih1MtxFTEmebV/9voLJT0qm9irJOYIa71 1QHgCcq8y62z22wLGKfOuS0NIcQODnolTiLdmCxsf9c6wtple80Hn932DyLnQS7gm/2q Qs+yK0iMmh0p6NsIGI0cnrXPx3RKdTWwMTWNnJHEYWbTfMlh8jVeNc5ZUle4NMcxTAY4 vKGg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530I404s4Px4WrYIx21D6HKAWgui5STHK3n5IKUx7JeYFVlYFgl2 Sb47Ovfs+mNPRiYZybsrxUA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwFhv5mAZXSo/yd4aWkyhzY7ZF3QiOwxUGGKvcIslvRVLDcaqpRfLL7KOElAW87rHh+8mu8Mg== X-Received: by 2002:a7b:cf1a:: with SMTP id l26mr3915101wmg.164.1599858879193; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 14:14:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (x2e726c8a.dyn.telefonica.de. [46.114.108.138]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id z14sm6492582wrh.14.2020.09.11.14.14.37 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 11 Sep 2020 14:14:38 -0700 (PDT) From: Klaus Cucinauomo Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.0.3.2.26\)) Subject: Re: Attempting to install on RPi4B w/ UEFI, having some problems Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 23:14:36 +0200 References: <20200910201146.GA99827@fuz.su> <0E3AD53C-AA47-491B-B1C3-931C559CDC10@yahoo.com> <20200911114214.GA56507@fuz.su> <9E14D44F-2F16-486E-ACFB-EC189A345D5B@yahoo.com> To: Mark Millard , freebsd-arm@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <9E14D44F-2F16-486E-ACFB-EC189A345D5B@yahoo.com> Message-Id: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.0.3.2.26) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Bp7mx0N5Qz3cvv X-Spamd-Bar: --- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.35 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[googlemail.com]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a00:1450:4000::/36]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[googlemail.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[googlemail.com,quarantine]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.90)[-0.902]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[yahoo.com,freebsd.org]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[googlemail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2a00:1450::/32, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[googlemail.com:dkim]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.96)[-0.961]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[googlemail.com:s=20161025]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[46.114.108.138:received]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.99)[-0.986]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-arm@freebsd.org]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2a00:1450:4864:20::342:from]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-arm] X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 21:14:42 -0000 Lol :-)=20 >=20 >=20 >>>=20 > On 2020-Sep-11, at 04:42, Robert Clausecker wrote: >>=20 >> The Wiki page (arm/Raspberry Pi) does say explicitly: >>=20 >>> RPI4-UEFI, allows us to triple-boot FreeBSD on the RPi4 from either >>> Device Tree or ACPI or ACPI&Device-tree(both).=20 > Am 11.09.2020 um 20:25 schrieb Mark Millard via freebsd-arm = : > Ahh. I do not expect that the Wiki is being maintained by > someone involved in implementing such things. So somewhat > more guess work is involved in the WIki's production.=20 Mark, you joker :-) lol Ha Ha=20 I assume you know the RP4-Wiki-page is maintained by me and=20 I assume that (from my last knowledge)=20 NOBODY is implementing anything for RPI4-UEFI-dev- compatibility=20 at the moment (except GregV who=E2=80=99s work was published by me in = the Wiki).=20 While not everybody knows that it=E2=80=99s a dev`s Wiki and not a = release-information-website for working environments=20 and user-support, it should be clear that things being in development(or = not) are NOT marked as production ready in the Wiki. Aarch64 will hold it=E2=80=99s Tier2-status in Fbsd 13, so many devs are = busy on Tier1 or other platforms & things. I know since months that RPI-UEFI-dev has a triple boot-option and that=20= A lot oft things(including the kernel hang if booted(it boots!) in = DeviceTree mode) DO NOT WORK. At the time I wrote about rpi4-uefi-dev RPI4-UEFI-dev didn=E2=80=99t = even boot to the root-prompt in FreeBSD in ACPI-mode. Again: the Wiki ISN`T a user=E2=80=99s support-site for working = environments but I=E2=80=99m happy if it expands=20 it`s popularity for all kind of users/devs, for everybody. (in best case = people who want to help in developing or even of course in extending the = Wiki) . Klaus From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Fri Sep 11 23:00:34 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 957193E9332 for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 23:00:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marklmi@yahoo.com) Received: from sonic316-55.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (sonic316-55.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com [98.137.69.31]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BpB753zHJz40mw for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 23:00:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marklmi@yahoo.com) X-YMail-OSG: 8HZLYe8VM1m4hwLm5lDr8lA0vLHlhbLsMAi9tJGe2f5IJpM5Mr_8n9st9Aumvxq qvVQSOPVI182YblP5BedHvhFXy7n.MmaI98.raP3aeDC6riTbdu6dJTRIcITuC1ec0J8D3b_4tw4 nOtjLXRKmrDXr6gB0JeEkVecPjVkaxy6Wu3IlPCGsvf0qlw2yA_vCgk889kYPi.lW5TctpNGtsq_ soCBl2ymueeAMEMafu.6ztgJZl5STq1ck49vUpN7ZdrsIp_W6k8fPDx3CjwI8e5BZVuHJMWfrRJ_ DhB5qTt0P1yoLM01fW.cokTpKxFsYrw1oSmfmqDXXVDX9EkjyMgnbs_XVMoNs1fYgLgf9T1gmNbN HvGFggne6JBgB.NrVbgTAoeYGJNXKUsPS.Qq.5vATEgdMyo_tosxdSH1S.zMScugUSRQB_eKinrG BQkzMQooEfU_YrW7csLZXgbPlKju_vKfS9XynoYNll65G0G1w0skd13YQL7fIDAUM8QpojP9YwD0 wwDxigHIDACoP3tG01NoXyyTLKEbKW_xqpVV01gke99kBkM7auCzXblj9fhHhpG43l8hNcbipTEt uHmsVbu.tS6oyoZzFmfee.R3E6MD48_wxqqdozGBcHQVsBW1YCEoI15lAOGnz_UncDz_voaTwB77 kgW191FDBF_Zi7gg2DCTmin78sUgQzJQypPUaxwkOKQhz_VvemFTnTth.HvdzjV_WpKG.pOxCySH gskZKOGboVfug.qHamfazQRsg86aiUE8MRzkfEaKYhgnPDqHsi1a8AmE2ys4SvbvAn.0Rs7TIC.Y w5qQBHjA_MWyhbmmlwprRx5J.qf1uR7ZrQ5WXInxK9H4dldZCIch2XMHjGC8qLRjWDjevYj5wb2N EazCMrnhCIjb80Tozq5w.YV4QiHT.OpBVpd9PT.5vrDYY0gBCsLRYXHi4jemuXrm3dC7BrVZ7nwL jOMuroGqTwA5az8M3A51CtkHbpDvywQkfgRP0Dczt8moyE8tzPKqaWGa9mS1q.a9Xkq.BTdSf2AR ZfyQa3zqSAQcgK5QGHJlJU_XEqBNuW.3v4cwF59ci23WtFo2W.DjrGfAAMLxtFsadihTMYwUZOTa Txil7ofB9RjWIQ7RbPxT2exWefe.kyYbAfWAGeSXGJR9ikg._iv5xwlZpvdxDc_TYKEVjPsa_Fin w9oLUgcJ9qX3gDaOj_qbJCFaNsFghl6zSk1ZRWRhuxiULqo0zowcvw13it2KnhvbtyWkQBL2XUxq 8Z.GBu5IdT.yLvYzOrltCZL7Kn.o04XQQQRLYylc29rRO9Me9Tkel6nXEeDedJqISxN6fRx25ng_ RZvNbGjkEsHuBIqXvBOAP65EEzEHaOGw1zPvvLm6U.ERvOIolLtLP.4ggx4wm1c_BWdL9KgQ9iRn u1EIC54E.QUxo1gsnmRzbg568LaRFNt3BqE86QlZvbg5ZxHOVHZK7gbWdd47EHjNb3jEJxv4o7OT JvHyHwvAmcHOXNDh8SP0HNlFRMqSjEYRvxlAA9wV3ia2CCmXz.nroJu_WO9ApXIJkELcSZjm7xcC N Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic316.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with HTTP; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 23:00:32 +0000 Received: by smtp419.mail.bf1.yahoo.com (VZM Hermes SMTP Server) with ESMTPA ID 48d6778812b90b5e18ed173a45537edc; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 23:00:31 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.1\)) Subject: Re: Attempting to install on RPi4B w/ UEFI, having some problems From: Mark Millard In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 16:00:29 -0700 Cc: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <20200910201146.GA99827@fuz.su> <0E3AD53C-AA47-491B-B1C3-931C559CDC10@yahoo.com> <20200911114214.GA56507@fuz.su> <9E14D44F-2F16-486E-ACFB-EC189A345D5B@yahoo.com> To: Klaus Cucinauomo X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.1) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BpB753zHJz40mw X-Spamd-Bar: --- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.45 / 15.00]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[yahoo.com]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ptr:yahoo.com]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[yahoo.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[yahoo.com,reject]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.97)[-0.974]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[googlemail.com]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[yahoo.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:36647, ipnet:98.137.64.0/20, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[yahoo.com:dkim]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.98)[-0.977]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[yahoo.com:s=s2048]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-0.997]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[98.137.69.31:from]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[98.137.69.31:from]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-arm] X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 23:00:34 -0000 On 2020-Sep-11, at 14:14, Klaus Cucinauomo wrote: > Lol :-)=20 >=20 >>=20 >>=20 >>>>=20 >> On 2020-Sep-11, at 04:42, Robert Clausecker wrote: >>>=20 >>> The Wiki page (arm/Raspberry Pi) does say explicitly: >>>=20 >>>> RPI4-UEFI, allows us to triple-boot FreeBSD on the RPi4 from either >>>> Device Tree or ACPI or ACPI&Device-tree(both).=20 >=20 >> Am 11.09.2020 um 20:25 schrieb Mark Millard via freebsd-arm = : >> Ahh. I do not expect that the Wiki is being maintained by >> someone involved in implementing such things. So somewhat >> more guess work is involved in the WIki's production.=20 >=20 > Mark, you joker :-) lol Ha Ha=20 >=20 > I assume you know the RP4-Wiki-page is maintained by me and=20 > I assume that (from my last knowledge)=20 > NOBODY is implementing anything for RPI4-UEFI-dev- compatibility=20 > at the moment (except GregV who=E2=80=99s work was published by me in = the Wiki).=20 > While not everybody knows that it=E2=80=99s a dev`s Wiki and not a = release-information-website for working environments=20 > and user-support, it should be clear that things being in = development(or not) are NOT marked as production ready in the Wiki. > Aarch64 will hold it=E2=80=99s Tier2-status in Fbsd 13, so many devs = are busy on Tier1 or other platforms & things. > I know since months that RPI-UEFI-dev has a triple boot-option and = that=20 > A lot oft things(including the kernel hang if booted(it boots!) in = DeviceTree mode) DO NOT WORK. > At the time I wrote about rpi4-uefi-dev RPI4-UEFI-dev didn=E2=80=99t = even boot to the root-prompt in FreeBSD in ACPI-mode. > Again: the Wiki ISN`T a user=E2=80=99s support-site for working = environments but I=E2=80=99m happy if it expands=20 > it`s popularity for all kind of users/devs, for everybody. (in best = case people who want to help in developing or even of course in = extending the Wiki) . >=20 My note is nothing against you. For example: I've no clue if FeeBSD has any example context of a supported/somewhat-working ACPI+DTB context for any tier level system. I do know that FreeBSD has various examples of ACPI support (no DTB) and various examples of u-boot based DTB support (no ACPI). I've no implementation knowledge that would indicate the status for ACPI+DTB. In other words: If I were editing such text I'd also be guessing the intended vs actual status. As for uefi/ACPI for the RPi4: It may well stay limited to things that happen to work currently, not adding device types or other such: The edk2 side of things does not have the full responsibility for enabling things. I do know that sysutils/edk2 was created that has in its Makefile : .if ${FLAVOR} =3D=3D rpi4 PLAT=3D rpi4 PLAT_ARCH=3D AARCH64 PLAT_ARGS=3D -D X64EMU_ENABLE=3DFALSE -D CAPSULE_ENABLE=3DFALSE PLAT_TARGET=3D RELEASE PLATFILE=3D Platform/RaspberryPi/RPi4/RPi4.dsc PLAT_RESULT=3D RPi4/${PLAT_TARGET}_GCC5/FV/RPI_EFI.fd PLAT_FILENAME=3D RPI_EFI.fd .endif so someone might experiment with port-based edk2 uefi builds. But pftf/RPi4 is no longer strictly based on just edk2 (and some Raspberry Pi firmware files of sufficient vintage): =E2=80=A2 This firmware was built from the official EDK2 = repository, with the following extra patch applied: =E2=80=A2 = 0001-MdeModulePkg-UefiBootManagerLib-Signal-ReadyToBoot-o.patch, so that = the Graphical console is set as default. It also looks messy to try to use sysutils/edk2 to pick out the same edk2 materials as used in an a specific pftf/RPi4 release (ignoring the patch issue). A local distinfo update would appear to be needed and the content to be substituted would have to be researched. (There would seem to be a similar status for each of: macchiatobin and rpi3 . If I understand right, the uefi/ACPI's in use with FreeBSD on MACCHIATObin Double Shots are not based on pure edk2 materials: edk2 has some linux biases in its implementation for the MACCHIATObin's.) =3D=3D=3D Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away in early 2018-Mar) From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Fri Sep 11 23:31:29 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 154F53E9A41 for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 23:31:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marklmi@yahoo.com) Received: from sonic316-55.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (sonic316-55.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com [98.137.69.31]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BpBpm1dLzz425w for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 23:31:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marklmi@yahoo.com) X-YMail-OSG: j2k7SM4VM1kQRweWs65S5I.nZgWHmFOZQ0B6VwazszeBUJeyP3noA9DrX2tm7vk KoyP0ABzw2nTpaaLcoBtYaeJhOtwUOO_bAc43Mee5XtaI_lFWTFPeod9HRbn8n84tN36b.jkDyrP PYkvoEX6fnukvxivLnQMnGznxF7pFsTf3nktM3Lgf5teSTcNjxVG8H91bwGhLWKTvx6dOxt5.ZJB usxJ92vIkHw2ICQzA4Q81ELpohTq4qEyQeOVi.tNJfbN1I.BNG.l5907Zinw194lzgc.5yCB1HxA EaEvAh.Q.d11u4V4nls8k0p.DN.VtWhIZLofYTNcfuavVWIMeHf5ay_Y.KQdEqTDwFdH7stbYtZ_ lGH_Ipi8TSAhoY8cqTOmIESuEbHQSVyFQKfDzDD7aMWkX4.uNpPWSEyMyb6PlI3JG7YsgeQyZ1cN MqE05oXEfXIoFndSLqiJO2vL2m4N87JugbWXkHuWucy8USUESpcXF0en0VxFaSis.1GY6O2IEhHk H73Wu_q44qMSrL5miw75uhYEiDL6rLB5Kd6Dh2tnPw9mJ6F1gwAW9acckyoq3x9KIx5sJarbo.I3 CuWPyMA2pBCZAOX8GHjkPQDb3Md4te3JX4hso1MC2LQwivlyLowwCeCkcmqWxnRClfg_8Cbx8Qkw xgOjqAO3Y4GaeEs9NxkT9fMb6dQ8vcC0BMy2K_YwIuXE235lwUlKnJNfbYLb.G4gTUbZJDPzXTDy Zq0Xgq1.AkfUwx.S8sHhY0YJkG.3ERUG1HycCWYUcF7k_kAufdScu9zeVuG94WRGjXElgDN_.0qA RI6IEzhd602df1uH7ZpY__hJftM1spfsqf.DYrtZFS793CboFSyTUpgkuhhQjjkzW0pVwdnAYisv J4wedggC_S6UmqmY9ExLrq8VUglk53rDSi1Ltnnbv3jx733WxHG5Oyf6RpNQ1s7fdBblpzp6qo1g fcIkdCcWmpkSRNCCS1Vea7SoEylS.tHJ8qbfe14M9hWmFJcjn0TQBlH_gUSL4WiqtwA.Z0uVkMk4 xnolyk8K5Ji2Rna3Fm13zc.GzVgaGgp8zUQWccOAOxl8cz8GEAeiACVFOpA0YvS8v1REfqOODv.E z1V6qOtovFshGhhi0S9nEXT4FLoMVJNwQS4RCGUF1CKOm5VPHSkj4FFor2h5BfEW6C3Zme8ir3CU XR3EkhQCIAezrl0BThfvShFjVKW2_q__glwn2aESkrmZgJQaACLQMohGfo8qi8Go34ajEn9iiRjc IOM9QjRDERGGmp4UhuGgvoXGwbIk68YxUg7zAT8GdMlg1EPO0OvT9HChv2ykG4sVLyz79IaFHvRG vKG.ct0DPVfyy1ybFhDbyf_nqB7g5lmxzHdE52WxsRkC25Y55VBruXPK9hx7LZTSmbcIfGuqRG4c xQ5HEixbKoFwC7bviv9Y61LjRT81umYFOZeMcCOCKe7J6iQdUExeGFoSnK7GFbHgHQEFZYOQ_OrB FJ9cpep_8lVWSFkjfGeuOd4sxUWa7B1kFE5.qgsfUy_J7NUORn3TGHsd1cEFgjvC_pF9nGBZNb5w 2qiNTFeB55qkXgTVlKxU.aEQt7Y5F5P2T Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic316.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with HTTP; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 23:31:26 +0000 Received: by smtp403.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (VZM Hermes SMTP Server) with ESMTPA ID 67ef9e5f09ae3c7e69177cb2e360e984; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 23:31:21 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.1\)) Subject: Re: Attempting to install on RPi4B w/ UEFI, having some problems From: Mark Millard In-Reply-To: <20200911140121.GA65117@fuz.su> Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 16:31:21 -0700 Cc: freebsd-arm Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <4541D63D-23F1-40F2-9F88-80F81C5DB447@yahoo.com> References: <20200911114214.GA56507@fuz.su> <20200910201146.GA99827@fuz.su> <0E3AD53C-AA47-491B-B1C3-931C559CDC10@yahoo.com> <5a89c2a07da75b2f1bcbdae9741982cc@unrelenting.technology> <20200911140121.GA65117@fuz.su> To: Robert Clausecker X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.1) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BpBpm1dLzz425w X-Spamd-Bar: --- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.43 / 15.00]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[yahoo.com]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ptr:yahoo.com]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[yahoo.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[yahoo.com,reject]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.95)[-0.947]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[yahoo.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:36647, ipnet:98.137.64.0/20, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[yahoo.com:dkim]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.99)[-0.988]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[yahoo.com:s=s2048]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.99)[-0.990]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[98.137.69.31:from]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[98.137.69.31:from]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-arm] X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 23:31:29 -0000 On 2020-Sep-11, at 07:01, Robert Clausecker wrote: > On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 01:56:10PM +0000, greg@unrelenting.technology = wrote: >> September 11, 2020 2:42 PM, "Robert Clausecker" wrote: >>=20 >>>> On 2020-Sep-10, at 13:11, Robert Clausecker wrote: >>>> FYI: I use GPT partitioning. (No claim that you need to.) >>>=20 >>> Ah, good to know that that works. I was afraid the UEFI code >>> required an MBR scheme as the documentation indicated such. >>=20 >> EDK2 UEFI not supporting GPT would be *very* weird. >> I'm pretty sure the documentation was referring to the RPi early = firmware. >=20 > Possible. I may check this later tonight. The main thing is that the > RPi4 firmware must be able to load UEFI's start4.elf from the EFI = partition > within a GPT partition table. Not sure if it can do that. I boot from a USB3 SSD that has: # gpart show -p =3D> 40 468862048 da0 GPT (224G) 40 2008 - free - (1.0M) 2048 413138944 da0p1 freebsd-ufs (197G) 413140992 9437184 da0p2 freebsd-swap (4.5G) 422578176 204800 da0p3 ms-basic-data (100M) 422782976 46079112 - free - (22G) The RPi4B finds start4.elf just fine. =3D=3D=3D Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away in early 2018-Mar) From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Sat Sep 12 01:24:02 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E5E73ECD18 for ; Sat, 12 Sep 2020 01:24:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from maciphone2@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-wr1-x432.google.com (mail-wr1-x432.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::432]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BpFJd2TLZz486M for ; Sat, 12 Sep 2020 01:24:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from maciphone2@googlemail.com) Received: by mail-wr1-x432.google.com with SMTP id z4so13114378wrr.4 for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 18:24:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :subject:date:references:to:in-reply-to:message-id; bh=hkt+XsEmjwzRungBJaIIzINGMoVgU5CwgZ70L9XKvMU=; b=lgkFmgOftoMKYchWviXwC7ELIvUwGsV5wcHORUAGcK26GYAupLBjQ/7LKVUyjK9DkJ ktaihTgASOU3bnS2TQjld/buG6IYDXXZLgcavznKeSjO20HvDfx0rMxqyJEgSj+aHuZI 9g+/gmkH37kLIzpRdpzVPRXV4ZhOaTbRWbHEIpaRlmdcYwE1nI+oj7THAQX2oheEE0vQ Ilg1ZtY4ktBz7B6L7A5raORQPOOMsJFxxUtTbHaQP4kJEn9cxweqsFHuRtEUcVUjgrXV dMR/zIpTN/INaKsXLHzJ6v4lJy33b0AahNQUVLvsMnFgM9Hn9uEPgop9VNRES7YW55/j El6g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531tx+j8cJe4eSqWZQZyhwlh8iQKO7rPCLbOWydGPzFDgl5jUJHW 1BRtJHCHLHdxsKg5VKHanh0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw/0wNfDSsx6bgnnwy1xPReG0sNIJ5YW8KjR3FqBaInZJGOMytZ/ZgQG31psTZdWFUo/yDhPA== X-Received: by 2002:adf:fd8d:: with SMTP id d13mr4703590wrr.104.1599873839564; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 18:23:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (x2e726c8a.dyn.telefonica.de. [46.114.108.138]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id f6sm9728823wme.32.2020.09.11.18.23.58 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 11 Sep 2020 18:23:58 -0700 (PDT) From: Klaus Cucinauomo Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.0.3.2.26\)) Subject: Re: Attempting to install on RPi4B w/ UEFI, having some problems Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2020 03:23:57 +0200 References: <20200910201146.GA99827@fuz.su> <0E3AD53C-AA47-491B-B1C3-931C559CDC10@yahoo.com> <20200911114214.GA56507@fuz.su> <9E14D44F-2F16-486E-ACFB-EC189A345D5B@yahoo.com> To: Mark Millard , freebsd-arm@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: Message-Id: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.0.3.2.26) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BpFJd2TLZz486M X-Spamd-Bar: --- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.03 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[googlemail.com]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a00:1450:4000::/36]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[googlemail.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[googlemail.com,quarantine]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.59)[-0.589]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[yahoo.com,freebsd.org]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[googlemail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2a00:1450::/32, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[googlemail.com:dkim]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.96)[-0.956]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[googlemail.com:s=20161025]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[46.114.108.138:received]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.99)[-0.985]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-arm@freebsd.org]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2a00:1450:4864:20::432:from]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-arm] X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2020 01:24:02 -0000 > Am 12.09.2020 um 01:00 schrieb Mark Millard : >=20 > My note is nothing against you. For example: I've no clue if > FeeBSD has any example context of a supported/somewhat-working > ACPI+DTB context for any tier level system. I do know that > FreeBSD has various examples of ACPI support (no DTB) and > various examples of u-boot based DTB support (no ACPI). I've > no implementation knowledge that would indicate=E2=80=A6. No problem, Mark, although being just lower class Tier2-people here :-) = , we work pretty well together and get amazing results =E2=80=A6. https://www.freebsd.org/platforms/ = https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/committers-guide/arch= s.html Although boring study it's extremely important to compare Tier 1 to Tier = 2 . My friend from the Netherlands in the Fbsd-forums has broken his hand = from writing the same=20 sentence 500 times a day:=20 "Tier2: get out of my face and do it yourself"."=20 .. just kidding..=20 > the status > for ACPI+DTB. For rpi4-uefi-dev:=20 =E2=80=9ETier 3: get out of my =E2=80=A6=E2=80=9C ;-) >=20 > In other words: If I were editing such text I'd also be > guessing the intended vs actual status. >=20 > As for uefi/ACPI for the RPi4: It may well stay limited > to things that happen to work currently, not adding device > types or other such: The edk2 side of things does not have > the full responsibility for enabling things. I do know that > sysutils/edk2 was created that has in its Makefile : >=20 > .if ${FLAVOR} =3D=3D rpi4 > PLAT=3D rpi4 > PLAT_ARCH=3D AARCH64 > PLAT_ARGS=3D -D X64EMU_ENABLE=3DFALSE -D CAPSULE_ENABLE=3DFALSE > PLAT_TARGET=3D RELEASE > PLATFILE=3D Platform/RaspberryPi/RPi4/RPi4.dsc > PLAT_RESULT=3D RPi4/${PLAT_TARGET}_GCC5/FV/RPI_EFI.fd > PLAT_FILENAME=3D RPI_EFI.fd > .endif >=20 > so someone might experiment with port-based edk2 uefi builds. >=20 > But pftf/RPi4 is no longer strictly based on just edk2 (and > some Raspberry Pi firmware files of sufficient vintage): >=20 > =E2=80=A2 This firmware was built from the official EDK2 = repository, with the following extra patch applied: >=20 > =E2=80=A2 = 0001-MdeModulePkg-UefiBootManagerLib-Signal-ReadyToBoot-o.patch, so that = the Graphical console is set as default. >=20 > It also looks messy to try to use sysutils/edk2 to pick out > the same edk2 materials as used in an a specific pftf/RPi4 > release (ignoring the patch issue). A local distinfo update > would appear to be needed and the content to be substituted > would have to be researched. Rpi4-uefi -dev =E2=80=9Ebooted=E2=80=9C FreeBSD from the first day on = without writing one line of code in Fbsd-src and without using any = sysutils.. (booted means: into Last = stage[https://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/boot-introduction.html] ) .. = and than it was hanging.. The ONLY line of code ever written in fbsd specially for = RPI4-UEFI-compat is the patches of =E2=80=9Emyfreeweb=E2=80=9C-GregV. While in this case you would be right if you tell me, that the following = is just a =E2=80=9Eguess=E2=80=9C : I guess you can completely forget and ignore the edkII in sysutils.. = while I=E2=80=99m only guessing(guessing is now my favorite term ;-) : It=E2=80=99s probably just a bulk-import of edkII without any intention = to target and support RPI4=E2=80=A6 I did NEVER guess in the Wiki(only I do this one guess here and only = once) :-) Since I personally will not support rpi4-uefi-dev by code or = administration and I would be more interested in supporting RPI4-u-boot- = fdt (if finding the time), I leave this discussion and would suggested that you, Mark, team up with = Robert Clausecker(if he is interested in) & others to research and support this topic for the future. Good luck ! For readers not familiar with it: RPI4-uefi-dev is a cool project with = great programmers which are extremely friendly and responsive, but the project is totally unsupported by FreeBSD for now. Klaus= From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Sat Sep 12 11:26:53 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D9A83D45BF for ; Sat, 12 Sep 2020 11:26:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kamalpr@gmail.com) Received: from mail-io1-xd2f.google.com (mail-io1-xd2f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2f]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BpVhD4MwHz3WmY for ; Sat, 12 Sep 2020 11:26:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kamalpr@gmail.com) Received: by mail-io1-xd2f.google.com with SMTP id y74so412663iof.12 for ; Sat, 12 Sep 2020 04:26:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=8BWZxChQasJvcUpBO31yQ5VN1D0ZGqwQOS7E6M8EI8I=; b=XYlr8LBtUaCeqHVUjKulGrpiljSrVeGehDBxhXeDiAQdK62BwDzuz6Vfa/pEtBmsPQ 4AIuaFZzApch6aD80iwLy+KYFk37uG7LdlmmmUUf1MICKHWTHDHcZJkKjda2wlO7215D 4af3QRfCqrc9qjHlmQEVUZZ1NV/BVJ5yS/qv4t+p8lHGnKWesXFKqhQlEMsDJQQngzB1 7a7x0R7qDVSkWS3hFDMpdBMrhqHVrCgo6uzVuhkfF0hRzjgr3EdyMq2WW4fzy7vmwF+6 m+aTkR6fMwc2a6lzJZGFStdnMqt0tCCKypi9S6xgRIs54BycRsNLtP7ZdbLSzJFv+iu8 oIQQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:reply-to:from:date:message-id :subject:to; bh=8BWZxChQasJvcUpBO31yQ5VN1D0ZGqwQOS7E6M8EI8I=; b=jXZP2BZiop212kK9sp0RapXGHK6xsn3a4qwtu+I26D+GzSAckodbSNa5/ha5Nodnhn DO9V8RIRDj3r0H7s066asvEQ+jyx7dPOAykuDan/Oflv1/6C1FMkZdi9tOxbN8CF5T++ wk5n0CX3TUinjTQh8cZqXhPGs4Cy6u/7JM7YmUc35bmhfuXUS//W4ziAUBh3QzgDvxV8 9820FmEL8kAi9Ed8vgq4K0LCxjxzXP7aQT62IYIIxnsIaJmHrc/GVaAj56vt5A8xrJeW NI6KN33UjZJVawWdiOIwSHq4gZt0zuEMvqRyKwidLDrCPrxhEPerRvxK3Gqy3M1eXhV4 wRLQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM53296GHxI7ynrGpGEbjsAmgGs3AZbrKPUKqWQpMtN40CVFS2hvMX OuRlXUt+glh0jp722uQ2HKP+3ApxwFyyvoX/bMhBz7YFnUAaYmU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxdFCyIp80a1tPmrsplwGTksXGfI0tIlgosgi/xmCqW+Fj+OMgBM8uZD23nMpJmuTxNAglg+ND6qFBZYW3Tbac= X-Received: by 2002:a6b:4f13:: with SMTP id d19mr4846282iob.90.1599910011355; Sat, 12 Sep 2020 04:26:51 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Reply-To: kamalp@acm.org From: "Kamal R. Prasad" Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2020 16:56:40 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: lpc_gpio_set_state() To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BpVhD4MwHz3WmY X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=XYlr8LBt; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of kamalpr@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2f as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=kamalpr@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.03 / 15.00]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[kamalp@acm.org]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.08)[-0.077]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com:dkim]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.96)[-0.961]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.99)[-0.990]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; REPLYTO_DOM_NEQ_FROM_DOM(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-arm@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2f:from]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-arm] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.33 X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2020 11:26:53 -0000 hello, i am not able to locate the definition of this function:- lpc_gpio_set_state() Its used in this function. https://socsvn.freebsd.org/socsvn/soc2015/mihai/bhyve-on-arm-head/sys/arm/lpc/lpc_spi.c Also, I saw on https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v4.5/source/drivers/spi/spi-pl022.c that line 85 defines #define SSP_CSR (r) (r + 0x030) /* vendor extension */ is it that for pl022 we should write the chip select vlaue to that register? thanks -kamal