From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Sun Jun 21 06:37:46 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 963E5343476 for ; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 06:37:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from olivier@freebsd.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::24b:4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49qNBy3Vx1z4RrX for ; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 06:37:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from olivier@freebsd.org) Received: from mail-pj1-f51.google.com (mail-pj1-f51.google.com [209.85.216.51]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) (Authenticated sender: olivier/mail) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6E43025709 for ; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 06:37:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from olivier@freebsd.org) Received: by mail-pj1-f51.google.com with SMTP id m2so6833642pjv.2 for ; Sat, 20 Jun 2020 23:37:46 -0700 (PDT) X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533p5UiYg+MOCMjHECu7yCCj9F04dOPeG/289j9MOY99qFC5swy/ 6FsWuub8wAYgssMbHYA2uus5Xr7EsKGI2qyLEQk= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxmNYR12aGVjIsm9B5dTYImbxKYjqhwoNCeMY4NDjcHnl0jnYNBnRU41yt1Aggem7fjeQQPcgk9JBT8/8twzEQ= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:6886:: with SMTP id a6mr12909329pjd.170.1592721465366; Sat, 20 Jun 2020 23:37:45 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200619.052348.232031363704679601.yasu@utahime.org> In-Reply-To: <20200619.052348.232031363704679601.yasu@utahime.org> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Olivier_Cochard=2DLabb=C3=A9?= Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2020 08:37:34 +0200 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: `shutdown -p now` fails to power off with VirtualBox UEFI boot To: Yasuhiro KIMURA Cc: freebsd-current Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.33 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2020 06:37:46 -0000 On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 10:26 PM Yasuhiro KIMURA wrote: > I have VirtualBox VM running 13-CURRENT. In order to switch from > legacy BIOS to UEFI I reinstalled OS by using > FreeBSD-13.0-CURRENT-amd64-20200611-r362037-disc1.iso. After that > `shutdow -p now` (or select 'ACPI shutdown' in VM menu) fails to power > off. Shutdown itself completes successfully. But power off never > happens and CPU usage keeps high until either closing or resetting VM. > > I reinstalled OS by using > FreeBSD-13.0-CURRENT-amd64-20200618-r362292-disc1.iso but the problem > still happens. If I switch back to legacy BIOS then the problem > disappears. And it doesn't happen with either 11.4-RELEASE and > 12.1-RELEASE. > > > Hi, Same problem using FreeBSD current UEFI guests with bhyve, so it should happen in any kind of hypervisor. It is an old regression (in the sense of -current, so older than 6 months). My idea was to generate very light UEFI VM images (because the snapshot VM images are BIOS based) and scripting a bisector tool, but I never took the time to do it. Regards, Olivier From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Sun Jun 21 06:40:47 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18289343999 for ; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 06:40:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bergerkos@yahoo.co.uk) Received: from sonic309-26.consmr.mail.ir2.yahoo.com (sonic309-26.consmr.mail.ir2.yahoo.com [77.238.179.84]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49qNGP1nxVz4S8d for ; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 06:40:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bergerkos@yahoo.co.uk) X-YMail-OSG: GuRNSsMVM1kF1xC0rdZu3IatOUixwjW2UylT_VGYUllcAGqqEJP.SE5oR_dlgXf PZrxESCxtICO.r.phIJUY93pT3ztQcZSiIla4MHtOk8H8hK4fZAs2euV_QxyQKOchkUQwAvo60F9 WPw55lxRVyTsYJScQGjPPN2YDpuxE9Mzzs6QQDgn0fuNrFbxlM.HHGKNoY3xJT9Ry7mLaHy8D253 GjKig3U1jLcnwn_xDjjqhRs8CwYQoMs74eC4gbzC7My4E2rQIO0CUjYXOrSNBxCwUaah9PAI.CLi SOI85D7ir73TWLw6kx6uF4wV1VmXrgbHWh7vPStjxEo1XuRCmdwEn21RCr8dOZacRne4PAIndEeB HEnenS79mDUuTlyOh5TP56aXAtZngGLh90Fl.IOxKzvIuBoPXUPTVFDx6gDmVoaG9MFJUc5iD5yw XxHLJWUN7.DbXnnfyv3qa0H1c79ArGSSGM9HPje2Sa1N8s4ZkGrD7tEX2984PJvr00jk4.qE8oNQ Ax4UZRZnXKkkFuCsPPs4SNX0vYcod4Dqa.X2lwoSEG9mNAkUAboa.7OtHC7STbKWdpUT3pRtvopV 8fXazmITGgeIMTJ8eCZNffH4mOEM1s8XNwQf3i0wQm58Eo1TXNETJb8IUbN9zYV4KzXnP2.3Iqiy ze2lX22B3vknH4t7p16G_2MnCZpigzYR.dwbVsrb44u6rnit1SSSUbka5NqDID15Dm7gEceEl5KG 0OGYfGlRJJBHJSIxpdQX7LDf5zR8O4MNuHVYxp58tfRByssPDDduU3dXHLdEiyWBf.dimLOMN8qd o_ISm1Vp9wf1gCxC89ynLmrxJ.UynHazXMJ2Hvbs.4J5DdtqF2OFi1CMlaPkJiookP0Q5VUy3uzL esOencUrEt48gB2PE069YVZsxp6m63szVdz_y9CUMabyl4DyHoE2xFP5iWeTTTp7miz055E69kKa WkBMaD3xolRWbuBG_MzJKXk2ocqCJ9fDTua0WXdYGYx9gqO1Si4VHMuEXMk.8bgwi4wQzmjYuALB DgNsvRinLlyKkt7ZywKlIA8ha2URQ4vLNhVr_xW2fOAuwWWSeCRDaPcOPXdbWPg2eZSDUB1EP51y 1UMR4xPfBLBnTZWOsKSyVhB.1h9StEULyXRqFARxtaQgOGTa_DAwaHr96oxHLg1n7abZ2z4bRiZW jCO9BCKJ5GN_RAZzORlN4jsKOaxcU1icKh0UIp5OiRjcIPM8JPlv2tbDJChIvEmVeOVFpzDxJZGA 8faKlgll5JzOWNyxcl24ws6P9G2i3PQ0wwQiEWQeFVfxcBoouOU8_RJ7DHz2bTD5QyEyRT9UqnLo HZfxLjhXApV8xmouZpnUcyPrAeBBmy7Mb3PnmsttW8ByRDbwdHsGiJhY.nzGE.HB5PxJrFGj2HwK rJEKtR9YN Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic309.consmr.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with HTTP; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 06:40:43 +0000 Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2020 06:40:41 +0000 (UTC) From: Kostya Berger Reply-To: "bergerkos@yahoo.co.uk" To: "freebsd-current@freebsd.org" Message-ID: <1559644055.2429905.1592721641280@mail.yahoo.com> Subject: vnc can't connect to socket MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1559644055.2429905.1592721641280.ref@mail.yahoo.com> X-Mailer: WebService/1.1.16138 YahooMailAndroidMobile YMobile/1.0 (com.yahoo.mobile.client.android.mail/6.8.2; Android/9; PKQ1.180904.001; whyred; Xiaomi; Redmi Note 5; 5.7; 2030x1080; ) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49qNGP1nxVz4S8d X-Spamd-Bar: - X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.47 / 15.00]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[bergerkos@yahoo.co.uk]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[yahoo.co.uk]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ptr:yahoo.com]; REPLYTO_ADDR_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; URI_COUNT_ODD(1.00)[1]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[yahoo.co.uk:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[yahoo.co.uk,reject]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.08)[-0.082]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[yahoo.co.uk]; ASN(0.00)[asn:34010, ipnet:77.238.176.0/22, country:GB]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.73)[-0.734]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[yahoo.co.uk:s=s2048]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.65)[-0.655]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; FREEMAIL_REPLYTO(0.00)[yahoo.co.uk]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[77.238.179.84:from]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_ALL(0.00)[]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[77.238.179.84:from]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.33 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2020 06:40:47 -0000 Hi,upgraded to 362292 via buildworld.Now I cannot connect to my bhyve guest= as I used to: neither via VNC nor via RDP.VNC gets error:=C2=A0unable to c= onnect the socket. Address family not supported by protocol family (47). Neither can I ping my bhyve IP (it uses a separate NIC and should have no p= roblems) Internet connectivity is ok and I can ping other hosts on my network. In 359997 all works fine. =D0=9E=D1=82=D0=BF=D1=80=D0=B0=D0=B2=D0=BB=D0=B5=D0=BD=D0=BE =D0=B8=D0=B7 Y= ahoo =D0=9F=D0=BE=D1=87=D1=82=D1=8B =D0=B4=D0=BB=D1=8F Android From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Sun Jun 21 08:55:00 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D959534707F for ; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 08:55:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rebecca@bsdio.com) Received: from out02.mta.xmission.com (out02.mta.xmission.com [166.70.13.232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49qRFJ1CdGz4Zvg; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 08:54:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rebecca@bsdio.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=simple/simple; d=bsdio.com; s=xmission; h=Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To: MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:References:Cc:To:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID :Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To: Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe :List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=iq2SepNKg4cgO40qA0cShxe0KZTZ7JFbvNAeeJ3iJiI=; b=jrSZtck6PvnlMqDv6WXIa32Oaf qR8jOOcKS4daZTBRcurhYYt/AnOFCsCGgpv9DB8GOnUSgMuDvS0AEBfgVZJZVwJONEGWPYO/dg/4M VxFpKkz3xzGtNVs7vuRLjACbKb9KOuHmZm9iX098ftIIG/m0roCzz0bMSSh9eSxpMoD8=; Received: from in01.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.51]) by out02.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jmvkg-0007wQ-1f; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 02:54:58 -0600 Received: from mta5.zcs.xmission.com ([166.70.13.69]) by in01.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1jmvkf-0006vv-BA; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 02:54:57 -0600 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mta5.zcs.xmission.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADE2E1280400; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 02:54:56 -0600 (MDT) X-Amavis-Modified: Mail body modified (using disclaimer) - mta5.zcs.xmission.com Received: from mta5.zcs.xmission.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mta5.zcs.xmission.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id b9G_GqcBJGKf; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 02:54:56 -0600 (MDT) Received: from [10.0.10.120] (c-174-52-16-57.hsd1.ut.comcast.net [174.52.16.57]) by mta5.zcs.xmission.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6F9CE12803EB; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 02:54:56 -0600 (MDT) To: =?UTF-8?Q?Olivier_Cochard-Labb=c3=a9?= , Yasuhiro KIMURA Cc: freebsd-current References: <20200619.052348.232031363704679601.yasu@utahime.org> From: Rebecca Cran Message-ID: <9af6e136-c1de-3135-9234-d7852fa89831@bsdio.com> Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2020 02:54:56 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US X-XM-SPF: eid=1jmvkf-0006vv-BA; ; ; mid=<9af6e136-c1de-3135-9234-d7852fa89831@bsdio.com>; ; ; hst=in01.mta.xmission.com; ; ; ip=166.70.13.69; ; ; frm=rebecca@bsdio.com; ; ; spf=pass X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 166.70.13.69 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: rebecca@bsdio.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on sa07.xmission.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=8.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_50, DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE,T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG,TooManyTo_001,XMSubLong, XM_B_Unicode,XM_B_Unicode3 autolearn=disabled version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Report: * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% * [score: 0.5077] * 0.3 TooManyTo_001 Multiple "To" Header Recipients 2x (uncommon) * 0.7 XMSubLong Long Subject * 0.0 T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG BODY: No description available. * 0.0 XM_B_Unicode BODY: Testing for specific types of unicode * 0.0 XM_B_Unicode3 BODY: Testing for specific types of unicode * -0.0 DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE Not listed in DCC * [sa07 0; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1] X-Spam-DCC: ; sa07 0; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Combo: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?; Olivier Cochard-Labb=c3=a9 , Yasuhiro KIMURA ?= X-Spam-Relay-Country: X-Spam-Timing: total 507 ms - load_scoreonly_sql: 0.04 (0.0%), signal_user_changed: 11 (2.2%), b_tie_ro: 10 (2.0%), parse: 1.26 (0.2%), extract_message_metadata: 4.6 (0.9%), get_uri_detail_list: 1.02 (0.2%), tests_pri_-1000: 3.1 (0.6%), tests_pri_-950: 1.57 (0.3%), tests_pri_-900: 1.30 (0.3%), tests_pri_-90: 58 (11.4%), check_bayes: 56 (11.1%), b_tokenize: 5 (1.0%), b_tok_get_all: 6 (1.2%), b_comp_prob: 2.2 (0.4%), b_tok_touch_all: 39 (7.7%), b_finish: 0.89 (0.2%), tests_pri_0: 413 (81.4%), check_dkim_signature: 0.58 (0.1%), check_dkim_adsp: 191 (37.7%), poll_dns_idle: 185 (36.5%), tests_pri_10: 2.2 (0.4%), tests_pri_500: 8 (1.6%), rewrite_mail: 0.00 (0.0%) Subject: Re: `shutdown -p now` fails to power off with VirtualBox UEFI boot X-Spam-Flag: No X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Thu, 05 May 2016 13:38:54 -0600) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in01.mta.xmission.com) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49qRFJ1CdGz4Zvg X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=bsdio.com header.s=xmission header.b=jrSZtck6; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of rebecca@bsdio.com designates 166.70.13.232 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=rebecca@bsdio.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.53 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[6]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[bsdio.com:s=xmission]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:166.70.13.0/24]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.07)[-1.069]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[bsdio.com]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.04)[-1.037]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_GOOD(0.00)[166.70.13.232:from]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[174.52.16.57:received]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[bsdio.com:+]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.83)[-0.825]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:6315, ipnet:166.70.0.0/16, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[166.70.13.232:from] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2020 08:55:00 -0000 On 6/21/20 12:37 AM, Olivier Cochard-Labbé wrote: > Same problem using FreeBSD current UEFI guests with bhyve, so it should > happen in any kind of hypervisor. > It is an old regression (in the sense of -current, so older than 6 months). > My idea was to generate very light UEFI VM images (because the snapshot VM > images are BIOS based) and scripting a bisector tool, but I never took the > time to do it. The problem on FreeBSD CURRENT at least is caused by the bhyve UEFI firmware that's running: I've committed a fix upstream to fix it (https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/commit/f159102a130fac9b416418eb9b6fa35b63426ca5), but still need to get CSM support working again before we can switch everyone over from the UDK2014.SP1 build to the newer code. -- Rebecca Cran From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Sun Jun 21 10:41:23 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 648AC349E26 for ; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 10:41:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yuripv@yuripv.dev) Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49qTc259Wmz3V0G; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 10:41:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yuripv@yuripv.dev) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id A607D5C00D1; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 06:34:44 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 21 Jun 2020 06:34:44 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yuripv.dev; h= subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=fm1; bh=a epHQd2+xBWgo8sbxfH/bg3uMWFkZuvXZjEs+oAuRzM=; b=OGwiVbLbpgMfQBAp+ AodXzZv1PXE1++TYNJ+tsWbrtA9kPQbWkVCgI8eluWiottRcNaMKREF0a6/7qBNt 8Asrd8ydeJw+uzpACRfazIFc11k9l9XX8dgfgTMJebFAwI/sVwW6S+HmyxGqeFxS LYyclLUwbTylKINB6lv6uAbmWOWY4kDxD3n9kJ+5FO97PGQKmjwAJDuS/xHTHhWT two9ZtSWzW3rixCx/bh+gCFCSNHUd/VKc2JBuJ5mx1Nf1Zqd2+fwdY/G92U9vioG fYLefo9lXINhdw4IECjU01F/pYASG5SFmhLr7BgHD2dRkejSuqnOOnYpdqAm5R/u Imc2g== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=aepHQd2+xBWgo8sbxfH/bg3uMWFkZuvXZjEs+oAuR zM=; b=oqtNMPfWOyiYUEJJzooFLc+L9WmXsUHk9Nq3AEKNJo1OFUK38QKsEUkuF 9/fX3Urwk9LffIQrhfuDaIUHjMZrLrEJVyHV/dkf72ICivLLpUP1IA7aKt1uzIMt D7H7KObsgi21sqXXhX/9GlmooPayhX0Ge/auZ2iomn5ZJq2j6dXzBt28K2BjTByB DVt1ljYcyxjWWNLK/y3/oZCckhvKc0ber3hXUT/B2CTIgtZ9mf23xy+UhCfCrwb1 JwVM8lHWh89v3fNyu2EzWbKoa7pmvwQI5VX/TTG4M30ul/2nFWqFqGnKonpElB4M zhe2xB/0aWXAn91ROVa/pgo5eCqDg== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduhedrudektddgfedvucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepuffvfhfhkffffgggjggtgfesthekredttdefjeenucfhrhhomhepjghurhhi ucfrrghnkhhovhcuoeihuhhrihhpvheshihurhhiphhvrdguvghvqeenucggtffrrghtth gvrhhnpeduueffgedthefftdfffeekhffgleeiieetgffhueegleefudffgedtueefkefg vdenucfkphepledurddvgedtrdduvdegrddufeejnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptd enucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhephihurhhiphhvseihuhhrihhpvhdruggvvh X-ME-Proxy: Received: from [192.168.1.6] (unknown [91.240.124.137]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 7115E3066D81; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 06:34:43 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: `shutdown -p now` fails to power off with VirtualBox UEFI boot To: =?UTF-8?Q?Olivier_Cochard-Labb=c3=a9?= , Yasuhiro KIMURA Cc: freebsd-current References: <20200619.052348.232031363704679601.yasu@utahime.org> From: Yuri Pankov Message-ID: <0a52c783-d3b2-837c-047c-e6c3cf354cd2@yuripv.dev> Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2020 13:34:41 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49qTc259Wmz3V0G X-Spamd-Bar: ++++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=yuripv.dev header.s=fm1 header.b=OGwiVbLb; dkim=pass header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm3 header.b=oqtNMPfW; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of yuripv@yuripv.dev designates 66.111.4.25 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=yuripv@yuripv.dev X-Spamd-Result: default: False [4.92 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(0.00)[yuripv.dev:s=fm1,messagingengine.com:s=fm3]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.35)[-0.346]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; R_SPF_ALLOW(0.00)[+ip4:66.111.4.25:c]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_XBL(5.00)[91.240.124.137:received]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[yuripv.dev]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_GOOD(0.00)[66.111.4.25:from]; BAD_REP_POLICIES(0.10)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[yuripv.dev:+,messagingengine.com:+]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.68)[0.676]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.31)[-0.310]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:11403, ipnet:66.111.4.0/24, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; GREYLIST(0.00)[pass,body]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[66.111.4.25:from] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2020 10:41:23 -0000 Olivier Cochard-Labbé wrote: > On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 10:26 PM Yasuhiro KIMURA wrote: > >> I have VirtualBox VM running 13-CURRENT. In order to switch from >> legacy BIOS to UEFI I reinstalled OS by using >> FreeBSD-13.0-CURRENT-amd64-20200611-r362037-disc1.iso. After that >> `shutdow -p now` (or select 'ACPI shutdown' in VM menu) fails to power >> off. Shutdown itself completes successfully. But power off never >> happens and CPU usage keeps high until either closing or resetting VM. >> >> I reinstalled OS by using >> FreeBSD-13.0-CURRENT-amd64-20200618-r362292-disc1.iso but the problem >> still happens. If I switch back to legacy BIOS then the problem >> disappears. And it doesn't happen with either 11.4-RELEASE and >> 12.1-RELEASE. >> >> >> Hi, > > Same problem using FreeBSD current UEFI guests with bhyve, so it should > happen in any kind of hypervisor. > It is an old regression (in the sense of -current, so older than 6 months). > My idea was to generate very light UEFI VM images (because the snapshot VM > images are BIOS based) and scripting a bisector tool, but I never took the > time to do it. FWIW, shutdown works for me in VMware Workstation (Windows) and ESXi VMs, UEFI boot. From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Sun Jun 21 12:29:07 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E56334D79C for ; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 12:29:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bergerkos@yahoo.co.uk) Received: from sonic301-21.consmr.mail.ir2.yahoo.com (sonic301-21.consmr.mail.ir2.yahoo.com [77.238.176.98]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49qX0L1G0wz3cWk for ; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 12:29:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bergerkos@yahoo.co.uk) X-YMail-OSG: tVPftPYVM1mLWiIYFzos5aD5PDUSQgVwVIXuOHZTjyhKssKxGVXbVWBFv0TNy8I QA2SA6osUtTymZMPvN.3IUT3BbSuQ4pKGuYW.6xFu56Nfe9KePhxEQYc41JdOnRIp7TimdYVqNvY FunwDwjcaiCMw.ZpqzcQZBZVTO6Wvvpskds4V0qjECx8.yWhtgHtg.46Z6CZav4nfosmfneqb4d3 mVb73NXk4vziFz3EZj9rwSULMCU_6BPvV0c0xb3c1YTd49Yli3QGDoWHDR_k.y89SR9BPFy8kQBL sIB6kWeB9RAnKBEnAWQ6PsoOK_wFxLmRtcNicS.9eNihB9zQAEs9asvFNIBZgm5rcw8DVLs28VUJ i5hlWGoI.LJL9rvF4dPRyejCm8qfYasI.7eMAH9iD0Nc1D6i4yyotbfpwiXtY.aGaCzns91JldhH T5wKlUDDFbrRhtqOHu491Zxp3eUUKtTStUflKPmoR6tXS7eEzWHMc5ml5IBdHUK5KFTmuXw1PibV w_LyZDd0A3QHg913fQ6rVo26gD19Tntb3e9F3540ggjafGlncTCegCBNFjBqT_csEKXIHjPzZG_2 NvemJCYStMlkk5bfW5Q88FSs5Q5Vd1DStTHQU6lp7p8Tx_60nyYwFNGaE3DYoHVjax3wMzihgbNw S2jxEFaPONwzmgeTxibun93G3ZwA587kYuXubpiRXQ95bIXWjntfvGFMjH.pPQdnnYmoy9mEouk0 JfamPVhqt20IPaNecxJWB7.3tH_GsFFSxDIW6539kradfuicOhKa2_xSefCsEr4vIDgkP6gjkQ7F d1dL3N.ocs.1Q1car2v3RsBcaHbNPAgr88lEcxuAiMGWKaqTn9NhF7RECbeo_MR69sUJHHNADNZB Hd8NiyFha6NP6uP7_JCmmUHxi2M3gZwxPmIH9No_YDjzqYfpkT0rbQChRwGyfh7eT8IySBAFkYTq 4SraSYI0PqlXpQsAuTbHV802i7hpA_NAkJNCE7UL_4ZWM55z8G4B19KZR0BwZ6Z79r.JwsmYqEdx Lc5jqrqImjb_puTqqAqv5mFcIE08j5Gwd9CWraTRgN09x4cHc6lCjAHrfSAOfSK4NTVht6ynCgZv qp3Yg3FK4YTGf6Afjg6rNhhN30mp0haHjUq4JdvaPYBQsrCHZdAc9Ub0z7kGmxtlR0K4B.wceIDu 7gsLYMocPe5zFnFUlnBfQfO.sq6NrGCNKb_4MOwsq6stfur6XSNa2CApfXTz0yltXuzZU0qyk3sn 8VVbhAGn5pI.y6ARek8BA6kbB.7H4Jo6p9pbwWTI3X1EydIGTM7awdpiiP7X8a9PKx35FaJ3p4pX mKbykQUqXN.grCHoIbtrA4OgCvb0TabEcZ.cIyIql6pQCSapX2W6hKy_KWJ4FsfY1cF6CvXlIAR7 C8qYbKHU24fc- Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic301.consmr.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with HTTP; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 12:29:04 +0000 Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2020 12:28:59 +0000 (UTC) From: Kostya Berger Reply-To: "bergerkos@yahoo.co.uk" To: "freebsd-current@freebsd.org" Message-ID: <1749874720.2583691.1592742539717@mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <1559644055.2429905.1592721641280@mail.yahoo.com> References: <1559644055.2429905.1592721641280.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <1559644055.2429905.1592721641280@mail.yahoo.com> Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=92_=D0=BE=D1=82=D0=B2=D0=B5=D1=82_=D0=BD=D0=B0:_vnc_can?= =?UTF-8?Q?'t_connect_to_socket?= MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: WebService/1.1.16138 YahooMailAndroidMobile YMobile/1.0 (com.yahoo.mobile.client.android.mail/6.8.2; Android/9; PKQ1.180904.001; whyred; Xiaomi; Redmi Note 5; 5.7; 2030x1080; ) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49qX0L1G0wz3cWk X-Spamd-Bar: -- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.55 / 15.00]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[bergerkos@yahoo.co.uk]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[yahoo.co.uk:s=s2048]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.88)[-0.883]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[yahoo.co.uk]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; FREEMAIL_REPLYTO(0.00)[yahoo.co.uk]; REPLYTO_ADDR_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.94)[-0.936]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ptr:yahoo.com]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[yahoo.co.uk:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[yahoo.co.uk,reject]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[77.238.176.98:from]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.26)[0.265]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[yahoo.co.uk]; ASN(0.00)[asn:34010, ipnet:77.238.176.0/22, country:GB]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[77.238.176.98:from] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.33 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2020 12:29:07 -0000 Ok, it turns out, it gives the previously mentioned error only if I use VNC= server string=C2=A00.0.0.0:5900 (as I always did). in my VNC client.But wh= en replaced with127.0.0.1:5900it connects all right. =D0=9E=D1=82=D0=BF=D1=80=D0=B0=D0=B2=D0=BB=D0=B5=D0=BD=D0=BE =D0=B8=D0=B7 Y= ahoo =D0=9F=D0=BE=D1=87=D1=82=D1=8B =D0=B4=D0=BB=D1=8F Android=20 =20 =D0=B2=D1=81, 21 =D0=B8=D1=8E=D0=BD. 2020 =D0=B2 9:40 Kostya Berger =D0=BD=D0=B0=D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=81=D0=B0=D0=BB(-=D0=B0): Hi= ,upgraded to 362292 via buildworld.Now I cannot connect to my bhyve guest a= s I used to: neither via VNC nor via RDP.VNC gets error:=C2=A0unable to con= nect the socket. Address family not supported by protocol family (47). Neither can I ping my bhyve IP (it uses a separate NIC and should have no p= roblems) Internet connectivity is ok and I can ping other hosts on my network. In 359997 all works fine. =D0=9E=D1=82=D0=BF=D1=80=D0=B0=D0=B2=D0=BB=D0=B5=D0=BD=D0=BE =D0=B8=D0=B7 Y= ahoo =D0=9F=D0=BE=D1=87=D1=82=D1=8B =D0=B4=D0=BB=D1=8F Android =20 From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Sun Jun 21 12:54:05 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D497834E642 for ; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 12:54:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tuexen@freebsd.org) Received: from drew.franken.de (mail-n.franken.de [193.175.24.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.franken.de", Issuer "Sectigo RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49qXY9576Hz3fD9 for ; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 12:54:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tuexen@freebsd.org) Received: from mb.fritz.box (ip4d15f5fc.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de [77.21.245.252]) (Authenticated sender: macmic) by mail-n.franken.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1812D7220B81C; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 14:54:02 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.80.23.2.2\)) Subject: =?utf-8?B?UmU6INCSINC+0YLQstC10YIg0L3QsDogdm5jIGNhbid0IGNvbm5l?= =?utf-8?B?Y3QgdG8gc29ja2V0?= From: Michael Tuexen In-Reply-To: <1749874720.2583691.1592742539717@mail.yahoo.com> Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2020 14:54:00 +0200 Cc: "freebsd-current@freebsd.org" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <5035A0D1-BF25-4483-BD52-75944EBBEF8E@freebsd.org> References: <1559644055.2429905.1592721641280.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <1559644055.2429905.1592721641280@mail.yahoo.com> <1749874720.2583691.1592742539717@mail.yahoo.com> To: "bergerkos@yahoo.co.uk" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.23.2.2) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=disabled version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on mail-n.franken.de X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49qXY9576Hz3fD9 X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.00 / 15.00]; local_wl_from(0.00)[freebsd.org]; ASN(0.00)[asn:680, ipnet:193.174.0.0/15, country:DE] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2020 12:54:05 -0000 > On 21. Jun 2020, at 14:28, Kostya Berger = wrote: >=20 > Ok, it turns out, it gives the previously mentioned error only if I = use VNC server string 0.0.0.0:5900 (as I always did). in my VNC = client.But when replaced with127.0.0.1:5900it connects all right. I don't hink 0.0.0.0 is a valid destination address you can use in = connect(). Using 127.0.0.1 should be fine. I guess, https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/361752 is the = relevant commit here. Best regards Michael > =D0=9E=D1=82=D0=BF=D1=80=D0=B0=D0=B2=D0=BB=D0=B5=D0=BD=D0=BE =D0=B8=D0=B7= Yahoo =D0=9F=D0=BE=D1=87=D1=82=D1=8B =D0=B4=D0=BB=D1=8F Android=20 >=20 > =D0=B2=D1=81, 21 =D0=B8=D1=8E=D0=BD. 2020 =D0=B2 9:40 Kostya = Berger =D0=BD=D0=B0=D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=81=D0=B0=D0=BB(-= =D0=B0): Hi,upgraded to 362292 via buildworld.Now I cannot connect to = my bhyve guest as I used to: neither via VNC nor via RDP.VNC gets error: = unable to connect the socket. Address family not supported by protocol = family (47). > Neither can I ping my bhyve IP (it uses a separate NIC and should have = no problems) > Internet connectivity is ok and I can ping other hosts on my network. > In 359997 all works fine. > =D0=9E=D1=82=D0=BF=D1=80=D0=B0=D0=B2=D0=BB=D0=B5=D0=BD=D0=BE =D0=B8=D0=B7= Yahoo =D0=9F=D0=BE=D1=87=D1=82=D1=8B =D0=B4=D0=BB=D1=8F Android =20 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Sun Jun 21 13:45:51 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 126C7350162 for ; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 13:45:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bergerkos@yahoo.co.uk) Received: from sonic307-53.consmr.mail.ir2.yahoo.com (sonic307-53.consmr.mail.ir2.yahoo.com [87.248.110.30]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49qYhs4HgYz40rd for ; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 13:45:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bergerkos@yahoo.co.uk) X-YMail-OSG: 3v3VhR4VM1n4eRIJaukqZj2JSeUnuWX5FV8kqjU3pMXWpUOFsbo2Mi_rNv5WpKP tDh9uQ5UYdonlbmThyrg1acZt7rqP2tcJnXyyRZfjRgrgSPI4.K8irZ_0o58Y_poEnTN10MOZOYV 6QbWSXNYGZAC29mj95I6BP7mL.2Z10aHovBbz6_Tqlj0H1rtLxvODP6MSVPlY1pNoZNbqnB31Qll Ma9ThVn2AsCyEPcaO.UGZ_dHm2BR_bn8KQMjEe2pfnEIwWdEDsbzoZ14asYyfJJiCt9W6.bXOnnz yrT7DblvM4VNYYL2_3idrguNqzFRKNa66eyAzYyc.FVmUj0iOfUO8RqBQoLnuvCYKUGoZWvjmpG9 5mOTKKF63KN6naE5NObTjXXFMYPetTPH33Qg.59KHSvCL3SFIsJAB6A3_sMIUy3UecQs8CKjhcD2 X_LfFRdNZ2gCcjousLeTXVgamwvI9qvut7wxAQUcHLMLcmBN.ADb1EsluQeYq2GP0r1ItoOEx9.4 xexNcZ9CB8Xc8z7IXcRn2poqVtGIwey7RQOCncNeE9NiI.yvx_OQS7nDj4F1y3gTDtHKmskFlRsz UOoga7_SNdJBkIDlZAiUZVh0KOBBGl4LcTcGdvfONmP6L5b2bW5SvOOMscxMiPCsrwlQqbdDqfQI ewuV1qkj08ZVO2ztkU5DzQ6UVJ_wDh373rxCsQDii3tVhXS7lwG21pPPBCUSEDzfN0Tf67tDYYc7 mGkUq6JfyjnhjpuxQShKOsZios5fCIgalKQFHzn6ywoaENQlFOcoP9Ps486YYEAG6dSVdTJZmvOs gqOeVxz3EGvm9XX5WHwH_3JMeWUJuaS_Sd2176Q3O02bsrVj7tKaANPxVEUWJUVxZPkfSfShipZP Z2wfxBXg1DYDRSj58M8YkpvqpQ5rxGN0otp9X6NoKL3oTqKflFkL.GTH5mBK1DyOgK9c76IiJgto BCEL6VNbNJgXcGyu0d5xMCS4IWp.Yq_YFRDDnXndbofaZkvlBr8dxyTVVG876tJmj2q3INtw0VTQ dPn7vsEIgzIt7uN1zPyHYk076VDJlGQVkBsf_D9goEeJ1jcmVSe6E7gzWmsx4F.4iaLcdVF7UjoQ 6xBDdvPx1LQeleobbr3x4nXxk.uhGaLfH7SaELGSBj8RTNsUowxSQnfqjIRTuYvvaT6hW4IbZbRq xIuPR8H.icCVK7wCbL3u1rYiEnpmlafTsxyrQn4YJHyiKgQm4UlD.KrpfvHS78zTJ04eixnFLh6A U9KNc7msaET9.R25CCQiYF7kiBo34sSuKc3Oxh5sHNJIzmSgZw2CSz8Yn43ISa09zMnQCOYqEnKY wbvfHPAtWDtQ.7pokX6fi0ADdkMuSGvp1iUUB927wvy0OVF3oFqz1opXoU1DO2R2ngRRCV5iUPwr areWQ3w-- Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic307.consmr.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with HTTP; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 13:45:47 +0000 Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2020 13:45:45 +0000 (UTC) From: Kostya Berger Reply-To: "bergerkos@yahoo.co.uk" To: "tuexen@freebsd.org" Cc: "freebsd-current@freebsd.org" Message-ID: <1916357992.2628772.1592747145425@mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <5035A0D1-BF25-4483-BD52-75944EBBEF8E@freebsd.org> References: <1559644055.2429905.1592721641280.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <1559644055.2429905.1592721641280@mail.yahoo.com> <1749874720.2583691.1592742539717@mail.yahoo.com> <5035A0D1-BF25-4483-BD52-75944EBBEF8E@freebsd.org> Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=92_=D0=BE=D1=82=D0=B2=D0=B5=D1=82_=D0=BD=D0=B0:_R?= =?UTF-8?Q?e:_=D0=92_=D0=BE=D1=82=D0=B2=D0=B5=D1=82_=D0=BD=D0=B0:?= =?UTF-8?Q?_vnc_can't_connect_to_socket?= MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: WebService/1.1.16138 YahooMailAndroidMobile YMobile/1.0 (com.yahoo.mobile.client.android.mail/6.8.2; Android/9; PKQ1.180904.001; whyred; Xiaomi; Redmi Note 5; 5.7; 2030x1080; ) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49qYhs4HgYz40rd X-Spamd-Bar: -- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.96 / 15.00]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[bergerkos@yahoo.co.uk]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[yahoo.co.uk]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ptr:yahoo.com]; REPLYTO_ADDR_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; URI_COUNT_ODD(1.00)[1]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[yahoo.co.uk:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[yahoo.co.uk,reject]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.94)[-0.944]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[yahoo.co.uk]; ASN(0.00)[asn:34010, ipnet:87.248.110.0/24, country:GB]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.99)[-0.994]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[yahoo.co.uk:s=s2048]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.02)[-1.019]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; FREEMAIL_REPLYTO(0.00)[yahoo.co.uk]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[87.248.110.30:from]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_ALL(0.00)[]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[87.248.110.30:from]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.33 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2020 13:45:51 -0000 Oh, I see, thank you.=C2=A0 =D0=9E=D1=82=D0=BF=D1=80=D0=B0=D0=B2=D0=BB=D0=B5=D0=BD=D0=BE =D0=B8=D0=B7 Y= ahoo =D0=9F=D0=BE=D1=87=D1=82=D1=8B =D0=B4=D0=BB=D1=8F Android=20 =20 =D0=B2=D1=81, 21 =D0=B8=D1=8E=D0=BD. 2020 =D0=B2 15:54 Michael Tuexen =D0=BD=D0=B0=D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=81=D0=B0=D0=BB(-=D0=B0): > O= n 21. Jun 2020, at 14:28, Kostya Berger wrote: >=20 > Ok, it turns out, it gives the previously mentioned error only if I use V= NC server string 0.0.0.0:5900 (as I always did). in my VNC client.But when = replaced with127.0.0.1:5900it connects all right. I don't hink 0.0.0.0 is a valid destination address you can use in connect(= ). Using 127.0.0.1 should be fine. I guess, https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/361752 is the relevant c= ommit here. Best regards Michael > =D0=9E=D1=82=D0=BF=D1=80=D0=B0=D0=B2=D0=BB=D0=B5=D0=BD=D0=BE =D0=B8=D0=B7= Yahoo =D0=9F=D0=BE=D1=87=D1=82=D1=8B =D0=B4=D0=BB=D1=8F Android=20 >=20 > =D0=B2=D1=81, 21 =D0=B8=D1=8E=D0=BD. 2020 =D0=B2 9:40 Kostya Berger =D0=BD=D0=B0=D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=81=D0=B0=D0=BB(-=D0=B0):=C2= =A0 Hi,upgraded to 362292 via buildworld.Now I cannot connect to my bhyve g= uest as I used to: neither via VNC nor via RDP.VNC gets error: unable to co= nnect the socket. Address family not supported by protocol family (47). > Neither can I ping my bhyve IP (it uses a separate NIC and should have no= problems) > Internet connectivity is ok and I can ping other hosts on my network. > In 359997 all works fine. > =D0=9E=D1=82=D0=BF=D1=80=D0=B0=D0=B2=D0=BB=D0=B5=D0=BD=D0=BE =D0=B8=D0=B7= Yahoo =D0=9F=D0=BE=D1=87=D1=82=D1=8B =D0=B4=D0=BB=D1=8F Android=C2=A0=20 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org= " _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" =20 From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Sun Jun 21 17:40:33 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21D6635637E for ; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 17:40:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ian@freebsd.org) Received: from outbound2k.ore.mailhop.org (outbound2k.ore.mailhop.org [54.148.219.64]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49qfvh4dkzz4Kb9 for ; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 17:40:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ian@freebsd.org) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1592761231; cv=none; d=outbound.mailhop.org; s=arc-outbound20181012; b=e4xy455ODtCF4AFffRzcWuB2j1EQD+Dey3Z62zDNtmWpahnJobQhsFu9zfI1rnTIfdHq8XJUXjM3n RJAkiQL4Ej2DJEFFmJ+U7BLpVaARd/VK4CgfriF2slKEImYwwk1lwg/hQEG1UI9uJjprAQp5Hw1y3/ lIudsKaexTEDogy9hhfAgBK9nyAuTnnT+pVgG3Ie9AlWrMA2ktvhgOlMW8HTbqd3+rs7jehERLkw88 ngmnq9izTKy64DVa1meyq8Eovz90cKRdaIZUD6e3XrAHePptWZRcSR+iFNI7K7lGokp7/dk/WJ4jpt 1wwpQ6fSQRzr0p5oLj/4tRDsezdSyTw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=outbound.mailhop.org; s=arc-outbound20181012; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:content-type:references:in-reply-to: date:cc:to:from:subject:message-id:dkim-signature:from; bh=2cTG7aWE0XtzozDtaf8J07IpNJZUqcfDq28AdCnQbZE=; b=X6ZlGMPLByA3NB2fmEJQxE3xXvYQwRUUW2C5I3PU2PJLw4isFSaLZ/rtzV6boI49KxioyyPmqU4ow 3a7jx5+OSv6KfOY1JxMKdtRuUqYQGmUpJoSYNts2tQu34+JduWCHmhh48HgyXDDEcJcCvqRjgYjL7+ yaprEuinaHiqq9L+V9CIwSxZePc0SjU8SNVq3VvukMpqjHXQHdCRYwvB1gKF3cPn/yQJhkq2YHuH8g WYuYTolU2mZQncKArnoJWx+VnBOcURuHfa212/t1x1gfVAFdwKToA3GrI7z8Rpxhwh6tCLE/dyQ+Dz vhamybRrGrGHR1pVS3kcE8pAc0rh0pQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; outbound4.ore.mailhop.org; spf=softfail smtp.mailfrom=freebsd.org smtp.remote-ip=67.177.211.60; dmarc=none header.from=freebsd.org; arc=none header.oldest-pass=0; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=outbound.mailhop.org; s=dkim-high; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:content-type:references:in-reply-to: date:cc:to:from:subject:message-id:from; bh=2cTG7aWE0XtzozDtaf8J07IpNJZUqcfDq28AdCnQbZE=; b=IwGuWPwejagPWI/5DnFiATYZHFT1nNGAlYbTsHDQPyiqwZyQOb5karzgNFR3D4fgyq1L50EunezNG tIrsbbhYNM8bLOK5cKMhOeP2d85NFc9rhye0Nxlb0o5Q4ERm0dFd/VaRERKoh7h06NTtR+8kdbikG+ 3/kjBStm/wcHgOT+KN3ypaM5empWmqX/g1QGADcyqV9R48taSe8vkaPybR5IzOKStmd/e3GaMeNXrN NY8aGriqeDiwszlZXNgk96VfsA/fz+wxIynhdgX4nRDmsYbf3egCicKwl5eonTUI70YEk36mcPxu90 3F+v4c8+isr26S/ghxAd4mwPVo3bSWA== X-MHO-RoutePath: aGlwcGll X-MHO-User: 4c014125-b3e6-11ea-b630-6b8aa7872eb8 X-Report-Abuse-To: https://support.duocircle.com/support/solutions/articles/5000540958-duocircle-standard-smtp-abuse-information X-Originating-IP: 67.177.211.60 X-Mail-Handler: DuoCircle Outbound SMTP Received: from ilsoft.org (c-67-177-211-60.hsd1.co.comcast.net [67.177.211.60]) by outbound4.ore.mailhop.org (Halon) with ESMTPSA id 4c014125-b3e6-11ea-b630-6b8aa7872eb8; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 17:40:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from rev (rev [172.22.42.240]) by ilsoft.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 05LHeSXO047915; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 11:40:28 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from ian@freebsd.org) Message-ID: Subject: Re: =?koi8-r?Q?=F7?= =?koi8-r?Q?_=CF=D4=D7=C5=D4?= =?koi8-r?Q?_=CE=C1=3A?= vnc can't connect to socket From: Ian Lepore To: Michael Tuexen , "bergerkos@yahoo.co.uk" Cc: "freebsd-current@freebsd.org" Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2020 11:40:28 -0600 In-Reply-To: <5035A0D1-BF25-4483-BD52-75944EBBEF8E@freebsd.org> References: <1559644055.2429905.1592721641280.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <1559644055.2429905.1592721641280@mail.yahoo.com> <1749874720.2583691.1592742539717@mail.yahoo.com> <5035A0D1-BF25-4483-BD52-75944EBBEF8E@freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-r" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.28.5 FreeBSD GNOME Team Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49qfvh4dkzz4Kb9 X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.00 / 15.00]; local_wl_from(0.00)[freebsd.org]; ASN(0.00)[asn:16509, ipnet:54.148.0.0/15, country:US] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2020 17:40:33 -0000 On Sun, 2020-06-21 at 14:54 +0200, Michael Tuexen wrote: > > On 21. Jun 2020, at 14:28, Kostya Berger > > wrote: > > > > Ok, it turns out, it gives the previously mentioned error only if I > > use VNC server string 0.0.0.0:5900 (as I always did). in my VNC > > client.But when replaced with127.0.0.1:5900it connects all right. > > I don't hink 0.0.0.0 is a valid destination address you can use in > connect(). Using 127.0.0.1 should > be fine. > > I guess, https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/361752 is the > relevant commit here. > *BSD has always accepted 0 as a synonym for localhost (and iirc, linux does not). If this no longer works, it's a regression which is going to cause existing applications and scripts to fail. At the very least it deserves an entry in UPDATING. -- Ian > Best regards > Michael > > ïÔÐÒÁ×ÌÅÎÏ ÉÚ Yahoo ðÏÞÔÙ ÄÌÑ Android > > > > ×Ó, 21 ÉÀÎ. 2020 × 9:40 Kostya Berger > > ÎÁÐÉÓÁÌ(-Á): Hi,upgraded to 362292 via buildworld.Now I cannot > > connect to my bhyve guest as I used to: neither via VNC nor via > > RDP.VNC gets error: unable to connect the socket. Address family > > not supported by protocol family (47). > > Neither can I ping my bhyve IP (it uses a separate NIC and should > > have no problems) > > Internet connectivity is ok and I can ping other hosts on my > > network. > > In 359997 all works fine. > > ïÔÐÒÁ×ÌÅÎÏ ÉÚ Yahoo ðÏÞÔÙ ÄÌÑ Android > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > > freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Sun Jun 21 17:54:41 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74D78356B87 for ; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 17:54:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tuexen@freebsd.org) Received: from drew.franken.de (drew.ipv6.franken.de [IPv6:2001:638:a02:a001:20e:cff:fe4a:feaa]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.franken.de", Issuer "Sectigo RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49qgD112B0z4Lfh; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 17:54:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tuexen@freebsd.org) Received: from mb.fritz.box (ip4d15f5fc.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de [77.21.245.252]) (Authenticated sender: macmic) by mail-n.franken.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 467997220B82A; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 19:54:38 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.80.23.2.2\)) Subject: =?utf-8?B?UmU6INCSINC+0YLQstC10YIg0L3QsDogdm5jIGNhbid0IGNvbm5l?= =?utf-8?B?Y3QgdG8gc29ja2V0?= From: Michael Tuexen In-Reply-To: Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2020 19:54:37 +0200 Cc: "bergerkos@yahoo.co.uk" , "freebsd-current@freebsd.org" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <1559644055.2429905.1592721641280.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <1559644055.2429905.1592721641280@mail.yahoo.com> <1749874720.2583691.1592742539717@mail.yahoo.com> <5035A0D1-BF25-4483-BD52-75944EBBEF8E@freebsd.org> To: Ian Lepore X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.23.2.2) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=disabled version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on mail-n.franken.de X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49qgD112B0z4Lfh X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.00 / 15.00]; local_wl_from(0.00)[freebsd.org]; ASN(0.00)[asn:680, ipnet:2001:638::/32, country:DE] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2020 17:54:41 -0000 > On 21. Jun 2020, at 19:40, Ian Lepore wrote: >=20 > On Sun, 2020-06-21 at 14:54 +0200, Michael Tuexen wrote: >>> On 21. Jun 2020, at 14:28, Kostya Berger >>> wrote: >>>=20 >>> Ok, it turns out, it gives the previously mentioned error only if I >>> use VNC server string 0.0.0.0:5900 (as I always did). in my VNC >>> client.But when replaced with127.0.0.1:5900it connects all right. >>=20 >> I don't hink 0.0.0.0 is a valid destination address you can use in >> connect(). Using 127.0.0.1 should >> be fine. >>=20 >> I guess, https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/361752 is the >> relevant commit here. >>=20 >=20 > *BSD has always accepted 0 as a synonym for localhost (and iirc, linux > does not). If this no longer works, it's a regression which is going > to cause existing applications and scripts to fail. At the very least > it deserves an entry in UPDATING. Hmm. 0.0.0.0 is a wildcard address, meaning any of my local addresses. I do understand how that works for binding a TCP socket you will be listening on. It just means accept TCP connections on all addresses. The destination address of the incoming SYN segment will determine which one to use. However, which of the local addresses should be used when calling connect() with 0.0.0.0? How should this choice be made? Best regards Michael >=20 > -- Ian >=20 >> Best regards >> Michael >>> =D0=9E=D1=82=D0=BF=D1=80=D0=B0=D0=B2=D0=BB=D0=B5=D0=BD=D0=BE =D0=B8=D0= =B7 Yahoo =D0=9F=D0=BE=D1=87=D1=82=D1=8B =D0=B4=D0=BB=D1=8F Android=20 >>>=20 >>> =D0=B2=D1=81, 21 =D0=B8=D1=8E=D0=BD. 2020 =D0=B2 9:40 Kostya = Berger >>> =D0=BD=D0=B0=D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=81=D0=B0=D0=BB(-=D0=B0): Hi,upgraded = to 362292 via buildworld.Now I cannot >>> connect to my bhyve guest as I used to: neither via VNC nor via >>> RDP.VNC gets error: unable to connect the socket. Address family >>> not supported by protocol family (47). >>> Neither can I ping my bhyve IP (it uses a separate NIC and should >>> have no problems) >>> Internet connectivity is ok and I can ping other hosts on my >>> network. >>> In 359997 all works fine. >>> =D0=9E=D1=82=D0=BF=D1=80=D0=B0=D0=B2=D0=BB=D0=B5=D0=BD=D0=BE =D0=B8=D0= =B7 Yahoo =D0=9F=D0=BE=D1=87=D1=82=D1=8B =D0=B4=D0=BB=D1=8F Android =20 >>> _______________________________________________ >>> freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list >>> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to " >>> freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>=20 >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list >> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to " >> freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>=20 >=20 From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Sun Jun 21 18:02:49 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E2153568F4 for ; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 18:02:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ian@freebsd.org) Received: from outbound5a.ore.mailhop.org (outbound5a.ore.mailhop.org [44.233.67.66]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49qgPN4Sjjz4MMr for ; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 18:02:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ian@freebsd.org) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1592762566; cv=none; d=outbound.mailhop.org; s=arc-outbound20181012; b=vxFdkKrhvAGx4ruuxlEFjtIHNS+cdb+9XrYJ2+5L8yosa/4xNiut0JOn1KWHkjPaxKFNW74jl6RBg N9vMU+4FFHk4KUc/KBgzNBkgxUlcuxi5muFAltwl+r+epZBdk6JQY3YcWSwGGrP5KXDPJvY/Zk3BK/ Wt2nDlaFT05lPLniqZUHVMs1HGVDEnL6nHaxXKfLWeWfpSnTUzbj9expL2Lxp2ZRzSuqFDE6xZeyfw IuJVzq2bms0DhFbpL+hyOwRaWzuO2erv+er/3W2Xt+nUmJKjI+emE1SHrMFF3GIQBQus9UTZYRW6Oe b4DPsIerLUkBY7dqlCD2AgHG7DOGl/Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=outbound.mailhop.org; s=arc-outbound20181012; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:content-type:references:in-reply-to: date:cc:to:from:subject:message-id:dkim-signature:from; bh=qk0ubO/efQxNf8Y5PNmOxl8PXX/9EoaCfzOjcCu9gg4=; b=HWH5Oxla9O9j1oR3RtzBhqVGDa4LYju6DueUyKKKsbMc9RUH1uWHz9Ez7PGu1TCvqosdKVmfH46hK gS5QipgTRenjVgLSBReeTTVJZKKmuHD1tagJL2NGwgQDGixgbLGiOn+V7s8qewGhlaKLwLNjYPBaLG 2xWRPGAgBj0yAJitK1k8lGZDdwMbzYK45rPM6af7f/zvFpH2Ljk3zMt+BGp77Dc42tqbFoyyma/hkn yJ0Uvzx1FN9h6igxk5yFuAlJuwSYd/0/S+4vicTJokpipC3a6wshR+zFWyAgSWgcHH+Au88YoA38Co A8LBTj3tJnyydCvvLKceaeorJdCd7Jg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; outbound3.ore.mailhop.org; spf=softfail smtp.mailfrom=freebsd.org smtp.remote-ip=67.177.211.60; dmarc=none header.from=freebsd.org; arc=none header.oldest-pass=0; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=outbound.mailhop.org; s=dkim-high; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:content-type:references:in-reply-to: date:cc:to:from:subject:message-id:from; bh=qk0ubO/efQxNf8Y5PNmOxl8PXX/9EoaCfzOjcCu9gg4=; b=JdTKWBzHm4McHRJQKXEyYhtpCdOjmqSZlxhp7WNnHqB/Ml2W2kivvicmVIQVg/2/PX1r5Zjp0vexM yFnpesYLrEstC4UFFN4Zhfr6oPCMxWKI1yGSZdCUIP6mx2zokanp6W7Wdj1j6+O2b11T6vvtF1AtrJ 0e4/wf/yYr+oAszQcUwHa7pU32cQDtaTw61pBLnO80bi5C0fEj0Nwq2cIDvg7pK4gU/TWb2Y5uKJvZ 3ypmVBxueaugPqGKIVuO058Gtdy5l/L0/lszUJZYyO9MagmNhAN2VdGMJvyAIWrZb5IBQNMZM5SnzR qCxECdz1VKva6hLV76thLfFyDLDPfHg== X-MHO-RoutePath: aGlwcGll X-MHO-User: 6830c9ff-b3e9-11ea-a2ba-9f0c275c2f69 X-Report-Abuse-To: https://support.duocircle.com/support/solutions/articles/5000540958-duocircle-standard-smtp-abuse-information X-Originating-IP: 67.177.211.60 X-Mail-Handler: DuoCircle Outbound SMTP Received: from ilsoft.org (c-67-177-211-60.hsd1.co.comcast.net [67.177.211.60]) by outbound3.ore.mailhop.org (Halon) with ESMTPSA id 6830c9ff-b3e9-11ea-a2ba-9f0c275c2f69; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 18:02:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from rev (rev [172.22.42.240]) by ilsoft.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 05LI2ivh048000; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 12:02:44 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from ian@freebsd.org) Message-ID: <8899ab009f5a2d6fca0cebd53913ca03a48f4861.camel@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: =?koi8-r?Q?=F7?= =?koi8-r?Q?_=CF=D4=D7=C5=D4?= =?koi8-r?Q?_=CE=C1=3A?= vnc can't connect to socket From: Ian Lepore To: Michael Tuexen Cc: "bergerkos@yahoo.co.uk" , "freebsd-current@freebsd.org" Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2020 12:02:44 -0600 In-Reply-To: References: <1559644055.2429905.1592721641280.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <1559644055.2429905.1592721641280@mail.yahoo.com> <1749874720.2583691.1592742539717@mail.yahoo.com> <5035A0D1-BF25-4483-BD52-75944EBBEF8E@freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ASCII" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.28.5 FreeBSD GNOME Team Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49qgPN4Sjjz4MMr X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.00 / 15.00]; local_wl_from(0.00)[freebsd.org]; ASN(0.00)[asn:16509, ipnet:44.224.0.0/11, country:US] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2020 18:02:49 -0000 On Sun, 2020-06-21 at 19:54 +0200, Michael Tuexen wrote: > > On 21. Jun 2020, at 19:40, Ian Lepore wrote: > > > > On Sun, 2020-06-21 at 14:54 +0200, Michael Tuexen wrote: > > > > On 21. Jun 2020, at 14:28, Kostya Berger > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Ok, it turns out, it gives the previously mentioned error only > > > > if I > > > > use VNC server string 0.0.0.0:5900 (as I always did). in my VNC > > > > client.But when replaced with127.0.0.1:5900it connects all > > > > right. > > > > > > I don't hink 0.0.0.0 is a valid destination address you can use > > > in > > > connect(). Using 127.0.0.1 should > > > be fine. > > > > > > I guess, https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/361752 is the > > > relevant commit here. > > > > > > > *BSD has always accepted 0 as a synonym for localhost (and iirc, linux > > does not). If this no longer works, it's a regression which is going > > to cause existing applications and scripts to fail. At the very least > > it deserves an entry in UPDATING. > > Hmm. 0.0.0.0 is a wildcard address, meaning any of my local addresses. > I do understand how that works for binding a TCP socket you will be > listening on. It just means accept TCP connections on all addresses. > The destination address of the incoming SYN segment will determine which > one to use. However, which of the local addresses should be used > when calling connect() with 0.0.0.0? How should this choice be made? > > Best regards > Michael > I don't know. I had thought the idea was sanctioned by a couple RFCs, but I just had a fresh look at them (1122, 5735) and it now appears to me that in both cases it sanctions using 0.0.0.0 as a source address, but not as a destination. So now I'm thinking maybe it has been a historical mistake amongst the BSDs to accept it as a destination address synonym for 127.0.0.1. I was mostly just pointing out this change to no longer accept it is going to be a big surprise to many people when it hits the streets in a release. I know it's going to break things at $work, we'll have to start combing around for uses of it and make changes. (Fixing my 20+ years of finger-memory for "nc 0 " will be harder.) -- Ian From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Sun Jun 21 18:31:26 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC5F63576D0 for ; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 18:31:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tuexen@freebsd.org) Received: from drew.franken.de (drew.ipv6.franken.de [IPv6:2001:638:a02:a001:20e:cff:fe4a:feaa]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.franken.de", Issuer "Sectigo RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49qh2Q3Kvrz4PmR; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 18:31:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tuexen@freebsd.org) Received: from mb.fritz.box (ip4d15f5fc.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de [77.21.245.252]) (Authenticated sender: macmic) by mail-n.franken.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id ABEA77220B829; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 20:31:23 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.80.23.2.2\)) Subject: =?utf-8?B?UmU6INCSINC+0YLQstC10YIg0L3QsDogdm5jIGNhbid0IGNvbm5l?= =?utf-8?B?Y3QgdG8gc29ja2V0?= From: Michael Tuexen In-Reply-To: <8899ab009f5a2d6fca0cebd53913ca03a48f4861.camel@freebsd.org> Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2020 20:31:22 +0200 Cc: "bergerkos@yahoo.co.uk" , "freebsd-current@freebsd.org" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: References: <1559644055.2429905.1592721641280.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <1559644055.2429905.1592721641280@mail.yahoo.com> <1749874720.2583691.1592742539717@mail.yahoo.com> <5035A0D1-BF25-4483-BD52-75944EBBEF8E@freebsd.org> <8899ab009f5a2d6fca0cebd53913ca03a48f4861.camel@freebsd.org> To: Ian Lepore X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.23.2.2) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=disabled version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on mail-n.franken.de X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49qh2Q3Kvrz4PmR X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.00 / 15.00]; ASN(0.00)[asn:680, ipnet:2001:638::/32, country:DE]; local_wl_from(0.00)[freebsd.org] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2020 18:31:26 -0000 > On 21. Jun 2020, at 20:02, Ian Lepore wrote: > > On Sun, 2020-06-21 at 19:54 +0200, Michael Tuexen wrote: >>> On 21. Jun 2020, at 19:40, Ian Lepore wrote: >>> >>> On Sun, 2020-06-21 at 14:54 +0200, Michael Tuexen wrote: >>>>> On 21. Jun 2020, at 14:28, Kostya Berger >>>>> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Ok, it turns out, it gives the previously mentioned error only >>>>> if I >>>>> use VNC server string 0.0.0.0:5900 (as I always did). in my VNC >>>>> client.But when replaced with127.0.0.1:5900it connects all >>>>> right. >>>> >>>> I don't hink 0.0.0.0 is a valid destination address you can use >>>> in >>>> connect(). Using 127.0.0.1 should >>>> be fine. >>>> >>>> I guess, https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/361752 is the >>>> relevant commit here. >>>> >>> >>> *BSD has always accepted 0 as a synonym for localhost (and iirc, linux >>> does not). If this no longer works, it's a regression which is going >>> to cause existing applications and scripts to fail. At the very least >>> it deserves an entry in UPDATING. >> >> Hmm. 0.0.0.0 is a wildcard address, meaning any of my local addresses. >> I do understand how that works for binding a TCP socket you will be >> listening on. It just means accept TCP connections on all addresses. >> The destination address of the incoming SYN segment will determine which >> one to use. However, which of the local addresses should be used >> when calling connect() with 0.0.0.0? How should this choice be made? >> >> Best regards >> Michael >> > > I don't know. I had thought the idea was sanctioned by a couple RFCs, > but I just had a fresh look at them (1122, 5735) and it now appears to > me that in both cases it sanctions using 0.0.0.0 as a source address, > but not as a destination. So now I'm thinking maybe it has been a You can use 0.0.0.0 as a source address in specific packets (mainly ones where you don't know your local address like during address configuration), but you can't use it as a destination address. In the TCP case (which is we are looking at), you can't use it as a source or destination address. However, this issue is not about addresses in packets, but address usage in the API, the connect() call for TCP in particular. > historical mistake amongst the BSDs to accept it as a destination > address synonym for 127.0.0.1. That might be possible. But it would be much better to use 127.0.0.1 if you mean it. > > I was mostly just pointing out this change to no longer accept it is > going to be a big surprise to many people when it hits the streets in a > release. I know it's going to break things at $work, we'll have to > start combing around for uses of it and make changes. (Fixing my 20+ > years of finger-memory for "nc 0 " will be harder.) OK. I'll bring that up in the bi-weekly transport telco. It was clear to disallow multicast, but the patch also wanted to deal with 0.0.0.0. For IPv6, there is such a mapping from connect(::0) to connect(::1). So for consistency it might make sense to do/keep the same for IPv4. I need to look at the code why this is working at all for IPv4 as you say it is. Best regards Michael > > -- Ian > > From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Sun Jun 21 20:52:27 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E90FA3329A1 for ; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 20:52:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from melifaro@ipfw.ru) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49ql954vxBz4bGY for ; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 20:52:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from melifaro@ipfw.ru) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id B87E1332B05; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 20:52:23 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAB49332B04; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 20:52:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from melifaro@ipfw.ru) Received: from forward500o.mail.yandex.net (forward500o.mail.yandex.net [37.140.190.195]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49ql8z6PWxz4Zlk; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 20:52:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from melifaro@ipfw.ru) Received: from mxback16g.mail.yandex.net (mxback16g.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:1472:2741:0:8b7:316]) by forward500o.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id A83BB60095; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 23:52:15 +0300 (MSK) Received: from localhost (localhost [::1]) by mxback16g.mail.yandex.net (mxback/Yandex) with ESMTP id zan0fZizPg-qFgGgbAE; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 23:52:15 +0300 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ipfw.ru; s=mail; t=1592772735; bh=9xWZRz/fiIIh8psvTGoCgbdo7W/XzmiVFJzv1iJVKfU=; h=Message-Id:Date:Subject:To:From; b=begypto7NfarKx0voVYOBy+TMCqRp6oTA+tm7di+rSSqimX282c44Y1JBV7VUSTjZ OZ/GgpMY1m1VuIvtEi87Bqa3z5QqdaO5p3OLg/+7kHnPgZAcU6YftQDHHWYrMbA7wK w00j6gf6JMEjYug0hE2DFIB2e6kwDl05m1NzPKsM= Received: by sas8-93eeb7dac565.qloud-c.yandex.net with HTTP; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 23:52:14 +0300 From: Alexander V. Chernikov Envelope-From: melifaro@ipfw.ru To: "current@FreeBSD.org" , net , freebsd-hackers Subject: net.inet6.ip6.deembed_scopeid removal X-Mailer: Yamail [ http://yandex.ru ] 5.0 Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2020 21:52:14 +0100 Message-Id: <626011592740709@mail.yandex.ru> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49ql8z6PWxz4Zlk X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=ipfw.ru header.s=mail header.b=begypto7; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of melifaro@ipfw.ru designates 37.140.190.195 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=melifaro@ipfw.ru X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.46 / 15.00]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_SOME(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[ipfw.ru:s=mail]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.02)[-1.016]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.01)[-1.007]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:37.140.128.0/18]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[freebsd.org]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[ipfw.ru:+]; MIME_BASE64_TEXT(0.10)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.54)[-0.535]; MIME_HTML_ONLY(0.20)[]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[melifaro@freebsd.org,melifaro@ipfw.ru]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[37.140.190.195:from]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:~]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:13238, ipnet:37.140.128.0/18, country:RU]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[melifaro@freebsd.org,melifaro@ipfw.ru]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_VERYGOOD(0.00)[37.140.190.195:from] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.33 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2020 20:52:30 -0000 From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Sun Jun 21 21:08:31 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 402D8334067 for ; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 21:08:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net) Received: from gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (br1.CN84in.dnsmgr.net [69.59.192.140]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49qlWf5TRnz4dNx; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 21:08:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net) Received: from gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id 05LL8SfI006937; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 14:08:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net) Received: (from freebsd-rwg@localhost) by gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id 05LL8STF006936; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 14:08:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg) From: "Rodney W. Grimes" Message-Id: <202006212108.05LL8STF006936@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> Subject: Re: ? ????? ??: vnc can't connect to socket In-Reply-To: To: Ian Lepore Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2020 14:08:28 -0700 (PDT) CC: Michael Tuexen , "bergerkos@yahoo.co.uk" , "freebsd-current@freebsd.org" X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL121h (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49qlWf5TRnz4dNx X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:13868, ipnet:69.59.192.0/19, country:US] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2020 21:08:31 -0000 > On Sun, 2020-06-21 at 14:54 +0200, Michael Tuexen wrote: > > > On 21. Jun 2020, at 14:28, Kostya Berger > > > wrote: > > > > > > Ok, it turns out, it gives the previously mentioned error only if I > > > use VNC server string 0.0.0.0:5900 (as I always did). in my VNC > > > client.But when replaced with127.0.0.1:5900it connects all right. > > > > I don't hink 0.0.0.0 is a valid destination address you can use in > > connect(). Using 127.0.0.1 should > > be fine. I do not believe that this is a destination address when your talking about 0.0.0.0:5900 on the VNC server side, that is a wild card accept any address and if this has been broken.. it must be fixed! > > I guess, https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/361752 is the > > relevant commit here. > > > > *BSD has always accepted 0 as a synonym for localhost (and iirc, linux > does not). If this no longer works, it's a regression which is going > to cause existing applications and scripts to fail. At the very least > it deserves an entry in UPDATING. I am not aware of that, but can not deny it either, and just confirmed it to be true: root {1002}# telnet 0.0.0.0 22 Trying 0.0.0.0... Connected to 0.0.0.0. Escape character is '^]'. SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_7.8 FreeBSD-20180909 INADDR_ANY is the wildcard listen address, but as a destination what code remapped it to 127.0.0.1? We should very seriously consider restoring this behavior. > -- Ian > > > Best regards > > Michael > > > ?????????? ?? Yahoo ????? ??? Android > > > > > > ??, 21 ???. 2020 ? 9:40 Kostya Berger > > > ???????(-?): Hi,upgraded to 362292 via buildworld.Now I cannot > > > connect to my bhyve guest as I used to: neither via VNC nor via > > > RDP.VNC gets error: unable to connect the socket. Address family > > > not supported by protocol family (47). > > > Neither can I ping my bhyve IP (it uses a separate NIC and should > > > have no problems) > > > Internet connectivity is ok and I can ping other hosts on my > > > network. > > > In 359997 all works fine. > > > ?????????? ?? Yahoo ????? ??? Android > > > _______________________________________________ > > > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > > > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > > > freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > > freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > -- Rod Grimes rgrimes@freebsd.org From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Sun Jun 21 21:10:11 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EAEF33414F for ; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 21:10:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from melifaro@ipfw.ru) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49qlYb08Kmz4dV7 for ; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 21:10:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from melifaro@ipfw.ru) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 0257933432E; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 21:10:11 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01FA63343AA; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 21:10:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from melifaro@ipfw.ru) Received: from forward500o.mail.yandex.net (forward500o.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:1a2d::610]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49qlYY5mQ6z4dbY; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 21:10:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from melifaro@ipfw.ru) Received: from mxback11q.mail.yandex.net (mxback11q.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:c0e:1b4:0:640:1f0c:10f2]) by forward500o.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 9789560271; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 00:10:05 +0300 (MSK) Received: from localhost (localhost [::1]) by mxback11q.mail.yandex.net (mxback/Yandex) with ESMTP id TFmiyBxwDr-A5d8jKxO; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 00:10:05 +0300 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ipfw.ru; s=mail; t=1592773805; bh=TS0jrS5jUdXWVvGUuGphirAta648X8DmAsnipM2Oydo=; h=References:Date:Message-Id:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From; b=RTW8CDWHuGk6D5M+J2Qh8FiOFuwoVqzdPCCK8c7/q7ibF6RtUfFCncNhZCpaazjLP ii5UUqsbevQmprciA3pCS3I5FJsNOBFPdT1OXuA3x25g7bDzGhq6eNTPvczJsg8W08 n6Cl42+n+Fx0uR6nhGXgoqdgJW+oQJI/8HR/lkwo= Received: by vla1-5413378edd9f.qloud-c.yandex.net with HTTP; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 00:10:04 +0300 From: Alexander V. Chernikov To: "current@FreeBSD.org" , net , freebsd-hackers In-Reply-To: <626011592740709@mail.yandex.ru> References: <626011592740709@mail.yandex.ru> Subject: Re: net.inet6.ip6.deembed_scopeid removal MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Yamail [ http://yandex.ru ] 5.0 Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2020 22:10:04 +0100 Message-Id: <645741592773762@mail.yandex.ru> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49qlYY5mQ6z4dbY X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=ipfw.ru header.s=mail header.b=RTW8CDWH; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of melifaro@ipfw.ru designates 2a02:6b8:0:1a2d::610 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=melifaro@ipfw.ru X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.88 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_SOME(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[ipfw.ru:s=mail]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.01)[-1.012]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a02:6b8:0:1000::/52:c]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[ipfw.ru]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.04)[-1.045]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[ipfw.ru:+]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.22)[-0.221]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:13238, ipnet:2a02:6b8::/32, country:RU]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[2a02:6b8:0:1a2d::610:from] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2020 21:10:11 -0000 [re-sending email with as non-html] Hey, I would like to deprecate net.inet6.ip6.deembed_scopeid sysctl while leaving the current default behaviour. This sysctl controls whether IPv6 scope is embedded in the IPv6 address or not when reading or writing route/interface/ifaddr data via rtsock/sysctl. Embedding scope in the address is a hack, that overwrites some of the bits that can be used otherwise. It was probably implemented that way to simplify route table interactions, as rtable uses this hack to add link-local addresses to the same radix tree. The change to fix the userland api by filling in sin6_scopeid and avoid touching IPv6 address was added in r243187, 7 years ago. It provided the sysctl in question, allowing to preserve compatibility with older applications, by reverting to the old behavior. 7 years looks like enough timeframe for the applications to be adjusted. Unless any major objections arise, I'm going to remove the code and make de-embedded IPv6 addresses the only option on July 5 2020. /Alexander From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Sun Jun 21 21:12:22 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 982B33344DA for ; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 21:12:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net) Received: from gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (br1.CN84in.dnsmgr.net [69.59.192.140]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49qlc56t3Gz4f3F; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 21:12:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net) Received: from gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id 05LLCKLX006978; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 14:12:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net) Received: (from freebsd-rwg@localhost) by gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id 05LLCKQR006977; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 14:12:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg) From: "Rodney W. Grimes" Message-Id: <202006212112.05LLCKQR006977@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> Subject: Re: ? ????? ??: vnc can't connect to socket In-Reply-To: <202006212108.05LL8STF006936@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> To: "Rodney W. Grimes" Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2020 14:12:20 -0700 (PDT) CC: Ian Lepore , Michael Tuexen , "bergerkos@yahoo.co.uk" , "freebsd-current@freebsd.org" X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL121h (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49qlc56t3Gz4f3F X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of freebsd-rwg@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net has no SPF policy when checking 69.59.192.140) smtp.mailfrom=freebsd-rwg@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.16 / 15.00]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_SOME(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.45)[-0.451]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.33)[-0.326]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[dnsmgr.net]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.04)[0.041]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:13868, ipnet:69.59.192.0/19, country:US]; FREEMAIL_CC(0.00)[freebsd.org,yahoo.co.uk]; SUBJECT_HAS_QUESTION(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2020 21:12:22 -0000 > > On Sun, 2020-06-21 at 14:54 +0200, Michael Tuexen wrote: > > > > On 21. Jun 2020, at 14:28, Kostya Berger > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Ok, it turns out, it gives the previously mentioned error only if I > > > > use VNC server string 0.0.0.0:5900 (as I always did). in my VNC > > > > client.But when replaced with127.0.0.1:5900it connects all right. > > > > > > I don't hink 0.0.0.0 is a valid destination address you can use in > > > connect(). Using 127.0.0.1 should > > > be fine. > > I do not believe that this is a destination address when your talking > about 0.0.0.0:5900 on the VNC server side, that is a wild card accept > any address and if this has been broken.. it must be fixed! > > > > I guess, https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/361752 is the > > > relevant commit here. > > > > > > > *BSD has always accepted 0 as a synonym for localhost (and iirc, linux > > does not). If this no longer works, it's a regression which is going > > to cause existing applications and scripts to fail. At the very least > > it deserves an entry in UPDATING. > > I am not aware of that, but can not deny it either, and just confirmed > it to be true: > root {1002}# telnet 0.0.0.0 22 > Trying 0.0.0.0... > Connected to 0.0.0.0. > Escape character is '^]'. > SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_7.8 FreeBSD-20180909 And to add the netstat data to show what connected: tcp4 0 0 127.0.0.1.22 127.0.0.1.43135 ESTABLISHED tcp4 38 0 127.0.0.1.43135 127.0.0.1.22 ESTABLISHED Can we back this commit out, discuss it in next weeks call, and then find a way forward? > > INADDR_ANY is the wildcard listen address, but as a destination what code remapped > it to 127.0.0.1? > > We should very seriously consider restoring this behavior. > > > -- Ian > > > > > Best regards > > > Michael > > > > ?????????? ?? Yahoo ????? ??? Android > > > > > > > > ??, 21 ???. 2020 ? 9:40 Kostya Berger > > > > ???????(-?): Hi,upgraded to 362292 via buildworld.Now I cannot > > > > connect to my bhyve guest as I used to: neither via VNC nor via > > > > RDP.VNC gets error: unable to connect the socket. Address family > > > > not supported by protocol family (47). > > > > Neither can I ping my bhyve IP (it uses a separate NIC and should > > > > have no problems) > > > > Internet connectivity is ok and I can ping other hosts on my > > > > network. > > > > In 359997 all works fine. > > > > ?????????? ?? Yahoo ????? ??? Android > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > > > > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > > > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > > > > freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > > > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > > > freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > > > -- > Rod Grimes rgrimes@freebsd.org > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- Rod Grimes rgrimes@freebsd.org From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Sun Jun 21 21:37:25 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36631335410 for ; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 21:37:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tuexen@freebsd.org) Received: from drew.franken.de (drew.ipv6.franken.de [IPv6:2001:638:a02:a001:20e:cff:fe4a:feaa]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.franken.de", Issuer "Sectigo RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49qm905vJGz3Rdw; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 21:37:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tuexen@freebsd.org) Received: from mb.fritz.box (ip4d15f5fc.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de [77.21.245.252]) (Authenticated sender: macmic) by mail-n.franken.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 73EBB7220B803; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 23:37:20 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.80.23.2.2\)) Subject: Re: ? ????? ??: vnc can't connect to socket From: Michael Tuexen In-Reply-To: <202006212112.05LLCKQR006977@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2020 23:37:19 +0200 Cc: Ian Lepore , "bergerkos@yahoo.co.uk" , "freebsd-current@freebsd.org" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <0DEC72D2-00D3-42E2-8FCA-ED1D6D65CDB7@freebsd.org> References: <202006212112.05LLCKQR006977@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> To: "Rodney W. Grimes" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.23.2.2) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=disabled version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on mail-n.franken.de X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49qm905vJGz3Rdw X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.00 / 15.00]; local_wl_from(0.00)[freebsd.org]; ASN(0.00)[asn:680, ipnet:2001:638::/32, country:DE] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2020 21:37:25 -0000 > On 21. Jun 2020, at 23:12, Rodney W. Grimes = wrote: >=20 >>> On Sun, 2020-06-21 at 14:54 +0200, Michael Tuexen wrote: >>>>> On 21. Jun 2020, at 14:28, Kostya Berger >>>>> wrote: >>>>>=20 >>>>> Ok, it turns out, it gives the previously mentioned error only if = I >>>>> use VNC server string 0.0.0.0:5900 (as I always did). in my VNC >>>>> client.But when replaced with127.0.0.1:5900it connects all right. >>>>=20 >>>> I don't hink 0.0.0.0 is a valid destination address you can use in >>>> connect(). Using 127.0.0.1 should >>>> be fine. >>=20 >> I do not believe that this is a destination address when your talking >> about 0.0.0.0:5900 on the VNC server side, that is a wild card accept >> any address and if this has been broken.. it must be fixed! >>=20 >>>> I guess, https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/361752 is the >>>> relevant commit here. >>>>=20 >>>=20 >>> *BSD has always accepted 0 as a synonym for localhost (and iirc, = linux >>> does not). If this no longer works, it's a regression which is = going >>> to cause existing applications and scripts to fail. At the very = least >>> it deserves an entry in UPDATING. >>=20 >> I am not aware of that, but can not deny it either, and just = confirmed >> it to be true: >> root {1002}# telnet 0.0.0.0 22 >> Trying 0.0.0.0... >> Connected to 0.0.0.0. >> Escape character is '^]'. >> SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_7.8 FreeBSD-20180909 >=20 > And to add the netstat data to show what connected: > tcp4 0 0 127.0.0.1.22 127.0.0.1.43135 = ESTABLISHED > tcp4 38 0 127.0.0.1.43135 127.0.0.1.22 = ESTABLISHED >=20 > Can we back this commit out, discuss it in next weeks call, > and then find a way forward? The commit changes the behaviour of calling connect(..., addr, ...) on a = TCP/IPv4 socket by (a) failing it and indicating EAFNOSUPPORT if addr =3D=3D = 255.255.255.255 (b) failing it and indicating EAFNOSUPPORT if addr =3D=3D 0.0.0.0 I think it is correct in doing (a). There is no doubt about that, since = TCP only supports unicast. (b) can be changed. As we discussed, for IPv6 connecting to ::0 is = changed to ::1 in = https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/head/sys/netinet6/in6_pcb.c?view=3Dmarkup#= l370. However, in_pcbladdr() does not do that mapping.=20 Let me figure out why 0.0.0.0 works as an address you can connect to. = Then I can prepare a patch to allow 0.0.0.0 again. I don't see a reason why we need = to revert r361752 and introduce it partially again. OK? Best regards Michael >=20 >>=20 >> INADDR_ANY is the wildcard listen address, but as a destination what = code remapped >> it to 127.0.0.1? >>=20 >> We should very seriously consider restoring this behavior. >>=20 >>> -- Ian >>>=20 >>>> Best regards >>>> Michael >>>>> ?????????? ?? Yahoo ????? ??? Android=20 >>>>>=20 >>>>> ??, 21 ???. 2020 ? 9:40 Kostya Berger >>>>> ???????(-?): Hi,upgraded to 362292 via buildworld.Now I cannot >>>>> connect to my bhyve guest as I used to: neither via VNC nor via >>>>> RDP.VNC gets error: unable to connect the socket. Address family >>>>> not supported by protocol family (47). >>>>> Neither can I ping my bhyve IP (it uses a separate NIC and should >>>>> have no problems) >>>>> Internet connectivity is ok and I can ping other hosts on my >>>>> network. >>>>> In 359997 all works fine. >>>>> ?????????? ?? Yahoo ????? ??? Android =20 >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list >>>>> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current >>>>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to " >>>>> freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>>>=20 >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list >>>> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current >>>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to " >>>> freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>>>=20 >>>=20 >>> _______________________________________________ >>> freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list >>> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>>=20 >>>=20 >>=20 >> --=20 >> Rod Grimes = rgrimes@freebsd.org >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list >> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>=20 >=20 > --=20 > Rod Grimes = rgrimes@freebsd.org From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Sun Jun 21 23:05:48 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3A84337D18 for ; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 23:05:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from melifaro@ipfw.ru) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49qp701B9yz3Ydt for ; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 23:05:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from melifaro@ipfw.ru) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 26931337967; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 23:05:48 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25054337D89; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 23:05:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from melifaro@ipfw.ru) Received: from forward501j.mail.yandex.net (forward501j.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:801:2::111]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49qp6y1ZmMz3Yw1; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 23:05:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from melifaro@ipfw.ru) Received: from mxback10q.mail.yandex.net (mxback10q.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:c0e:1b4:0:640:b6ef:cb3]) by forward501j.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id D44BF3380064; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 02:05:41 +0300 (MSK) Received: from localhost (localhost [::1]) by mxback10q.mail.yandex.net (mxback/Yandex) with ESMTP id pZBTlDF1YE-5fd82uEr; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 02:05:41 +0300 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ipfw.ru; s=mail; t=1592780741; bh=gkgovdBpraTb6swxB2MuufFuBSYbNOP8Lq58pZhBCSU=; h=Message-Id:Date:Subject:To:From; b=mOTxj2WLj/wxAeVTxnalSCJjfo3kQv2spc4Awyms4PwUKadsSPyyBtTmgCGNaEnB4 CTno6+U+77PvMxUbXXcRokXjGBjZW0WcjO2/QZ7x59nh+8iuU+jlU7+e5/4apfVBYm JlN1z8u5fcOMOCNycr/mFWTGmtjBDso5xLQrYObg= Received: by vla1-b1f71bfb4f06.qloud-c.yandex.net with HTTP; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 02:05:41 +0300 From: Alexander V. Chernikov Envelope-From: melifaro@ipfw.ru To: "current@FreeBSD.org" , net , freebsd-hackers Subject: routed && route6d removal proposal MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Yamail [ http://yandex.ru ] 5.0 Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 00:05:41 +0100 Message-Id: <273191592779927@mail.yandex.ru> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49qp6y1ZmMz3Yw1 X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=ipfw.ru header.s=mail header.b=mOTxj2WL; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of melifaro@ipfw.ru designates 2a02:6b8:0:801:2::111 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=melifaro@ipfw.ru X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.35 / 15.00]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_SOME(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[ipfw.ru:s=mail]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.01)[-1.011]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a02:6b8:0::/52]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[freebsd.org]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.04)[-1.044]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[ipfw.ru:+]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.99)[-0.992]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[melifaro@freebsd.org,melifaro@ipfw.ru]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[2a02:6b8:0:801:2::111:from]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:13238, ipnet:2a02:6b8::/32, country:RU]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[melifaro@freebsd.org,melifaro@ipfw.ru] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2020 23:05:48 -0000 Hey, I would like to propose removal of sbin/routed and usr.sbin/route6d. routed(8) is the daemon implementing RIPv2 routing protocol. route6d(8) is the daemon implementing RIPng routing protocol for IPv6. RIP [1] was one of the first protocols used in the networking. The first version was implemented back in 1982. 1. Network landscape has changed since then. BGP, OSPF, IS-ISIS and other routing protocols have been created and greatly improved over years. People have created and adopted numerous designs leveraging OSPF/ISIS or BGP. RIP became obsolete a while ago as there were no competitive advantage it can offer. "It is the oldest routing protocol used by the network industry and is considered by many to be inefficient or border-line obsolete." — [2], 2009 "Today, the only reason you might run across a network running RIPv2 is either that the network is very old and in serious need of an upgrade or the network is running cheaper, consumer-grade routing hardware that can only support RIP" — [3], 2016. 1.1. Nowadays the daemon name is simply misleading. Given situation described above, one does expect far wider functionality from the program named "route[6]d" than just RIP implementation. 2. Multiple routing stacks supporting all major routing protocol including RIP exists these days: bird, frr, quagga. Many BGP-only designs in are gaining popularity, so do bgp speakers such as exabgp or gobgp. Nowadays, if one needs dynamic routing on the host, OSPF or BGP speaker is the choice. FreeBSD packages contains well-maintained ports for these. Having RIP[ng] speakers in base offers no advantage. 3. Both routed/route6d are largely unmaintained [4] and presents an additional attack vector. Here is the list of last non-trivial commits to routed/route6d: sbin/routed: r327276 - coverity r317035 - rtsock fix r299825 - coverity r299822 - coverity, from netbsd r299821 - coverity, from netbsd r299784 - coverity, from netbsd r299771 - coverify, from netbsd r286347 - bugfix r276602 - SA14:21 patch r271919 - SA14:21 fix r215702 - logic fix, 2010 usr.sbin/route6d: r337500 - functional fix, 2018 r317035 - rtsock fix r311994 - coverity r311985 - coverity r299869 - coverity r299491 - coverity r270234 - link-local fix r243233 - functionality improvement, 2012 To summarise: RIP protocol is obsolete, implementations for newer protocols exists in ports, implementation in base is unmaintained. With all that in mind I propose to remove routed and route6d from base in FreeBSD 13. Timeline: June 5 - feedback aggregation and decision point July 19 - removal (proposed) [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Routing_Information_Protocol [2] https://www.globalknowledge.com/ca-en/resources/resource-library/articles/basics-of-understanding-rip/ [3] https://www.networkcomputing.com/data-centers/comparing-dynamic-routing-protocols [4] https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=runnamed&list_id=361897&namedcmd=routed_prs /Alexander From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Mon Jun 22 03:29:53 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AE9933D06B for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 03:29:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cse.cem@gmail.com) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49qvzh55kCz440k for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 03:29:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cse.cem@gmail.com) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id AD2B733D325; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 03:29:52 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB87C33D324; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 03:29:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cse.cem@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ot1-f54.google.com (mail-ot1-f54.google.com [209.85.210.54]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49qvzh2ZCPz44Lc; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 03:29:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cse.cem@gmail.com) Received: by mail-ot1-f54.google.com with SMTP id u23so11935744otq.10; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 20:29:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:reply-to :from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ivSe/ieUSju4bSGuMoz1momk6Jpx0rDzm0iUsxqxdFs=; b=kH9/fE7XN9f+Hn3Seu8RrfLGhI//Gc/eC1k1UCdwEsYfJqX0WxjI+KFhhW7SSYW5B7 FNpaEA/6TXmZW9BKBfF85lhTSO7LOziADNIj+qgy5YxdxjAUwqumFx3W3cbtHHLA4kuE w7V9Tat5YXluuF+lZG6umQz5eDvuBjhFggvhaOTGk4bWzWGYRJn/CfNXhreRtC2phdy6 aGlARgrsNgKQ4g1rc+AOb0N++DtFcIRaOXxojgsSYNad+QePxfeVePCZpUmYLhSX+c+M L12xFdX9nbnS8icwTz4K13A5sr3ycRrZyHV64FiRkXh98wBhzxu8vGGTqjw/tloelmS/ PmUg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531GpUKYG+02rJe8SqPXVR34k2jFXqBTxexQPnAedRkqsjv4+EV4 UjIYDKpYr+xah/HaUL5I08Ojdzns X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJycfF1rt4HhD2kbJRpLdWdU7+z6uWIQaL38YwkfYmb4Htu6aGTXQI3VIvaTPyq58KaQ0QQ/cQ== X-Received: by 2002:a9d:80c:: with SMTP id 12mr12529624oty.208.1592796590787; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 20:29:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-ot1-f49.google.com (mail-ot1-f49.google.com. [209.85.210.49]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h22sm1113476oos.48.2020.06.21.20.29.50 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 21 Jun 2020 20:29:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ot1-f49.google.com with SMTP id d4so11961069otk.2; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 20:29:50 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a9d:2224:: with SMTP id o33mr12629681ota.216.1592796590201; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 20:29:50 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <273191592779927@mail.yandex.ru> In-Reply-To: <273191592779927@mail.yandex.ru> Reply-To: cem@freebsd.org From: Conrad Meyer Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2020 20:29:39 -0700 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: routed && route6d removal proposal To: "Alexander V. Chernikov" Cc: "current@FreeBSD.org" , net , freebsd-hackers Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49qvzh2ZCPz44Lc X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:209.85.128.0/17, country:US]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 03:29:53 -0000 Sounds good to me. We don't need a RIP daemon in base, and if needed, it is just a pkg install away via one of the myrriad maintained routing daemons. Thanks, Conrad On Sun, Jun 21, 2020 at 4:06 PM Alexander V. Chernikov wrote: > > Hey, > > I would like to propose removal of sbin/routed and usr.sbin/route6d. > > routed(8) is the daemon implementing RIPv2 routing protocol. > route6d(8) is the daemon implementing RIPng routing protocol for IPv6. > > RIP [1] was one of the first protocols used in the networking. The first= version was implemented back in 1982. > > 1. Network landscape has changed since then. BGP, OSPF, IS-ISIS and other= routing protocols have been created and greatly improved over years. Peopl= e have created and adopted numerous designs leveraging OSPF/ISIS or BGP. > RIP became obsolete a while ago as there were no competitive advantage it= can offer. > "It is the oldest routing protocol used by the network industry and is co= nsidered by many to be inefficient or border-line obsolete." =E2=80=94 [2],= 2009 > "Today, the only reason you might run across a network running RIPv2 is e= ither that the network is very old and in serious need of an upgrade or the= network is running cheaper, consumer-grade routing hardware that can only = support RIP" =E2=80=94 [3], 2016. > > 1.1. Nowadays the daemon name is simply misleading. Given situation descr= ibed above, one does expect far wider functionality from the program named = "route[6]d" than just RIP implementation. > > 2. Multiple routing stacks supporting all major routing protocol includin= g RIP exists these days: bird, frr, quagga. Many BGP-only designs in are ga= ining popularity, so do bgp speakers such as exabgp or gobgp. Nowadays, if= one needs dynamic routing on the host, OSPF or BGP speaker is the choice. = FreeBSD packages contains well-maintained ports for these. Having RIP[ng] s= peakers in base offers no advantage. > > 3. Both routed/route6d are largely unmaintained [4] and presents an addit= ional attack vector. Here is the list of last non-trivial commits to routed= /route6d: > > sbin/routed: > r327276 - coverity > r317035 - rtsock fix > r299825 - coverity > r299822 - coverity, from netbsd > r299821 - coverity, from netbsd > r299784 - coverity, from netbsd > r299771 - coverify, from netbsd > r286347 - bugfix > r276602 - SA14:21 patch > r271919 - SA14:21 fix > r215702 - logic fix, 2010 > > usr.sbin/route6d: > r337500 - functional fix, 2018 > r317035 - rtsock fix > r311994 - coverity > r311985 - coverity > r299869 - coverity > r299491 - coverity > r270234 - link-local fix > r243233 - functionality improvement, 2012 > > To summarise: RIP protocol is obsolete, implementations for newer protoco= ls exists in ports, implementation in base is unmaintained. > > With all that in mind I propose to remove routed and route6d from base in= FreeBSD 13. > Timeline: > June 5 - feedback aggregation and decision point > July 19 - removal (proposed) > > > [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Routing_Information_Protocol > [2] https://www.globalknowledge.com/ca-en/resources/resource-library/arti= cles/basics-of-understanding-rip/ > [3] https://www.networkcomputing.com/data-centers/comparing-dynamic-routi= ng-protocols > [4] https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=3Drunnamed&list= _id=3D361897&namedcmd=3Drouted_prs > > /Alexander > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org= " From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Mon Jun 22 07:46:15 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65C9C34353A for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 07:46:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yasu@utahime.org) Received: from gate.utahime.jp (gate.utahime.jp [183.180.29.210]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49r1gV1jfXz4KG4 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 07:46:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yasu@utahime.org) Received: from eastasia.home.utahime.org (eastasia.home.utahime.org [192.168.174.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by gate.utahime.jp (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA8AEA77 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 16:46:09 +0900 (JST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=utahime.org; s=maybe2019112701; t=1592811969; bh=b3UOfNOOwSveVDJEIhdtkVAUsGDsUppWaJkCm2CdPyc=; h=Date:To:Subject:From:In-Reply-To:References; b=LbX9VNd3ZvZXWZWrzuclkm1Z8+nybkEM8SVL/XX9FJYi43SoXIGS7nkclbFy53hBa mXbgyQpd1ygzwnpZOxMYvoXDfsETIlso+ShRjOtKNJrOrbhoGOp91VZ4RzV9qI7eKk K6nS9r74UeJJoHsVDTDom8c8R8PWZIgXh5JTNadSMmVMugNs4HAl7nDawZO6IpoyMa FJufvSftALxj6BC1rpzJpmucoIiP+jNogC6aPfNF22ZaUhL14Mg8Y5OSDn7bGoAkl1 y1vr1qMskoXZSUcJMMPiZckWdNaj72tGCdVP11cwusW24YcSvh9ffUOFwZ771GLYGl 7l8aewBO09n4A== Received: from localhost (rolling.home.utahime.org [192.168.174.11]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by eastasia.home.utahime.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 86A9C4AA81; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 16:46:08 +0900 (JST) X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.102.3 at eastasia.home.utahime.org Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 16:45:23 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20200622.164523.492970231904065687.yasu@utahime.org> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: `shutdown -p now` fails to power off with VirtualBox UEFI boot From: Yasuhiro KIMURA In-Reply-To: <20200619.052348.232031363704679601.yasu@utahime.org> References: <20200619.052348.232031363704679601.yasu@utahime.org> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.8 on Emacs 26.3 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49r1gV1jfXz4KG4 X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=utahime.org header.s=maybe2019112701 header.b=LbX9VNd3; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of yasu@utahime.org designates 183.180.29.210 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=yasu@utahime.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.66 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[utahime.org:s=maybe2019112701]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.02)[-1.022]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-current@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.03)[-1.033]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[utahime.org]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+a:spf-authorized.utahime.org]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[utahime.org:+]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.61)[-0.607]; MID_CONTAINS_FROM(1.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:2519, ipnet:183.180.0.0/16, country:JP]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 07:46:15 -0000 From: Yasuhiro KIMURA Subject: `shutdown -p now` fails to power off with VirtualBox UEFI boot Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2020 05:23:48 +0900 (JST) > I have VirtualBox VM running 13-CURRENT. In order to switch from > legacy BIOS to UEFI I reinstalled OS by using > FreeBSD-13.0-CURRENT-amd64-20200611-r362037-disc1.iso. After that > `shutdow -p now` (or select 'ACPI shutdown' in VM menu) fails to power > off. Shutdown itself completes successfully. But power off never > happens and CPU usage keeps high until either closing or resetting VM. > > I reinstalled OS by using > FreeBSD-13.0-CURRENT-amd64-20200618-r362292-disc1.iso but the problem > still happens. If I switch back to legacy BIOS then the problem > disappears. And it doesn't happen with either 11.4-RELEASE and > 12.1-RELEASE. I tried bisect and found this problem happens with r342108 and after. Commit message of r342108 says as following. yasu@rolling-vm-freebsd5[1012]% LANG=C svn log -c 342108 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ r342108 | cem | 2018-12-15 14:46:04 +0900 (Sat, 15 Dec 2018) | 7 lines efirt: When present, attempt to use EFI runtime services to shutdown PR: maybe related to 233998 (inconclusive at this time) Submitted by: byuu (previous version) Reviewed by: imp Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D18506 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ yasu@rolling-vm-freebsd5[1013]% Judging from it, I think it's very likely that this commit caused the problem. Then is there anything I can do for further investigation? --- Yasuhiro KIMURA From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Mon Jun 22 10:14:14 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DB273468BD for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 10:14:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yasu@utahime.org) Received: from gate.utahime.jp (gate.utahime.jp [183.180.29.210]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49r4yF0nxFz4Vc0 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 10:14:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yasu@utahime.org) Received: from eastasia.home.utahime.org (eastasia.home.utahime.org [192.168.174.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by gate.utahime.jp (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 59E922519 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 19:14:09 +0900 (JST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=utahime.org; s=maybe2019112701; t=1592820849; bh=piAVPF1ZdWX9sRiY1Z4ajN0Li8M5QtMdszRQZXiHNa0=; h=Date:To:Subject:From:In-Reply-To:References; b=UOuxpTpRO8aB0kRxvkkWRLDJ8DsDEF8QKv57WWvPwVw6e2nBBZ1iuza+DZFsFIt9D I+gaD7v4RvuQ6UbHY63UEztX1loOPBQneWEMGtHoE/q8yphjo0UVZhTm2HG5VWVYfL b5vd6QpAB4HZf9R69SaMwHZo7CtyZUwARKrDt+GxKckPMypULtTdYUa/DhLaBLYW4r 434JVE86GjgoO9kd0ofs4diYXgDX4hBM1qKLxgA3mIWtK91Sf7mdJmOA7ZksbcC5DE I7Oa5mVa7dLf4e/LsDy0GWS2Ewv/r8JLO5V6F2YtOa4JPfnKSD0m/n9YgyXneVIIDC VZqWYP4l5oymg== Received: from localhost (rolling.home.utahime.org [192.168.174.11]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by eastasia.home.utahime.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 634784C08C; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 19:14:06 +0900 (JST) X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.102.3 at eastasia.home.utahime.org Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 19:13:48 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20200622.191348.2299220192956341788.yasu@utahime.org> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: `shutdown -p now` fails to power off with VirtualBox UEFI boot From: Yasuhiro KIMURA In-Reply-To: <20200622.164523.492970231904065687.yasu@utahime.org> References: <20200619.052348.232031363704679601.yasu@utahime.org> <20200622.164523.492970231904065687.yasu@utahime.org> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.8 on Emacs 26.3 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49r4yF0nxFz4Vc0 X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=utahime.org header.s=maybe2019112701 header.b=UOuxpTpR; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of yasu@utahime.org designates 183.180.29.210 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=yasu@utahime.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.03 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[utahime.org:s=maybe2019112701]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.01)[-1.014]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-current@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.03)[-1.029]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[utahime.org]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+a:spf-authorized.utahime.org]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[utahime.org:+]; MID_CONTAINS_FROM(1.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.01)[0.014]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:2519, ipnet:183.180.0.0/16, country:JP]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 10:14:14 -0000 From: Yasuhiro KIMURA Subject: Re: `shutdown -p now` fails to power off with VirtualBox UEFI boot Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 16:45:23 +0900 (JST) > I tried bisect and found this problem happens with r342108 and > after. Commit message of r342108 says as following. > > yasu@rolling-vm-freebsd5[1012]% LANG=C svn log -c 342108 > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > r342108 | cem | 2018-12-15 14:46:04 +0900 (Sat, 15 Dec 2018) | 7 lines > > efirt: When present, attempt to use EFI runtime services to shutdown > > PR: maybe related to 233998 (inconclusive at this time) > Submitted by: byuu (previous version) > Reviewed by: imp > Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D18506 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > yasu@rolling-vm-freebsd5[1013]% > > Judging from it, I think it's very likely that this commit caused the > problem. > > Then is there anything I can do for further investigation? I submitted this problem to Bugzilla. Bug 247474 - `shutdown -p now` fails to power off with VirtualBox UEFI boot https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247474 --- Yasuhiro KIMURA From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Mon Jun 22 12:49:56 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16D1B34A948 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 12:49:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49r8Pv3lssz4kDM for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 12:49:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 80CA134A7CF; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 12:49:55 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 806EA34A8FF; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 12:49:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net) Received: from gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (br1.CN84in.dnsmgr.net [69.59.192.140]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49r8Pv2Tcbz4k19; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 12:49:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net) Received: from gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id 05MCnr93010398; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 05:49:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net) Received: (from freebsd-rwg@localhost) by gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id 05MCnrKw010397; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 05:49:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg) From: "Rodney W. Grimes" Message-Id: <202006221249.05MCnrKw010397@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> Subject: Re: routed && route6d removal proposal In-Reply-To: <273191592779927@mail.yandex.ru> To: "Alexander V. Chernikov" Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 05:49:53 -0700 (PDT) CC: "current@FreeBSD.org" , net , freebsd-hackers X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL121h (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49r8Pv2Tcbz4k19 X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:13868, ipnet:69.59.192.0/19, country:US] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 12:49:56 -0000 > Hey, > > I would like to propose removal of sbin/routed and usr.sbin/route6d. I disagree with removal, as your analysis is flawed. > routed(8) is the daemon implementing RIPv2 routing protocol. > route6d(8) is the daemon implementing RIPng routing protocol for IPv6. > > RIP [1] was one of the first protocols used in the networking. The first version was implemented back in 1982. RIPv1 was implemented in 1982, RIPv2 became RFC2453 in November 1998, and is a current and valid IETF standard, STD56. It was updated by RFC4822 in February 2007. > > 1. Network landscape has changed since then. BGP, OSPF, IS-ISIS and other routing protocols have been created and greatly improved over years. People have created and adopted numerous designs leveraging OSPF/ISIS or BGP. > RIP became obsolete a while ago as there were no competitive advantage it can offer. > "It is the oldest routing protocol used by the network industry and is considered by many to be inefficient or border-line obsolete." ? [2], 2009 RIPv2 is not obosolete, and your reference is not authoritave on what is or is not an obsolete network protocol. I know of people using RIPv2 in networks. > "Today, the only reason you might run across a network running RIPv2 is either that the network is very old and in serious need of an upgrade or the network is running cheaper, consumer-grade routing hardware that can only support RIP" ? [3], 2016. Or there simply is no need for anything more complicated. RipV2 is a very simple protocol and works fine for small networks in many settings. > > 1.1. Nowadays the daemon name is simply misleading. Given situation described above, one does expect far wider functionality from the program named "route[6]d" than just RIP implementation. I'll agree the name is missleading, so change it, but removal on your false basis is not. > > 2. Multiple routing stacks supporting all major routing protocol including RIP exists these days: bird, frr, quagga. Many BGP-only designs in are gaining popularity, so do bgp speakers such as exabgp or gobgp. Nowadays, if one needs dynamic routing on the host, OSPF or BGP speaker is the choice. FreeBSD packages contains well-maintained ports for these. Having RIP[ng] speakers in base offers no advantage. Routing stacks? You mean routing daemons? Forcing users to install bir, frr or quagga when all they need, or have been using for a long time is in base ripv2 is not good for users. > 3. Both routed/route6d are largely unmaintained [4] and presents an additional attack vector. Here is the list of last non-trivial commits to routed/route6d: Whats unmaintained about code that has no need to change cause it just pretty much works? > > sbin/routed: > r327276 - coverity > r317035 - rtsock fix > r299825 - coverity > r299822 - coverity, from netbsd > r299821 - coverity, from netbsd > r299784 - coverity, from netbsd > r299771 - coverify, from netbsd > r286347 - bugfix > r276602 - SA14:21 patch > r271919 - SA14:21 fix > r215702 - logic fix, 2010 > > usr.sbin/route6d: > r337500 - functional fix, 2018 > r317035 - rtsock fix > r311994 - coverity > r311985 - coverity > r299869 - coverity > r299491 - coverity > r270234 - link-local fix > r243233 - functionality improvement, 2012 > > To summarise: RIP protocol is obsolete, implementations for newer protocols exists in ports, implementation in base is unmaintained. > > With all that in mind I propose to remove routed and route6d from base in FreeBSD 13. > Timeline: > June 5 - feedback aggregation and decision point > July 19 - removal (proposed) > > > [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Routing_Information_Protocol > [2] https://www.globalknowledge.com/ca-en/resources/resource-library/articles/basics-of-understanding-rip/ > [3] https://www.networkcomputing.com/data-centers/comparing-dynamic-routing-protocols > [4] https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=runnamed&list_id=361897&namedcmd=routed_prs > > /Alexander > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > -- Rod Grimes rgrimes@freebsd.org From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Mon Jun 22 13:54:38 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70F3634C8D2 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 13:54:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hrs@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49r9rZ2QClz4qXC for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 13:54:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hrs@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 5123B34C8D1; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 13:54:38 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50C7134C9B7; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 13:54:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hrs@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [96.47.72.83]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49r9rZ1PRvz4qXB; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 13:54:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hrs@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2400:4051:a743:3c00:16:ceff:fe34:2700]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: hrs) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3214633254; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 13:54:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hrs@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 22:40:15 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20200622.224015.2228079563921213662.hrs@FreeBSD.org> To: melifaro@ipfw.ru Cc: current@freebsd.org, net@freebsd.org, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: net.inet6.ip6.deembed_scopeid removal From: Hiroki Sato In-Reply-To: <645741592773762@mail.yandex.ru> References: <626011592740709@mail.yandex.ru> <645741592773762@mail.yandex.ru> X-Old-PGPkey-fingerprint: BDB3 443F A5DD B3D0 A530 FFD7 4F2C D3D8 2793 CF2D X-PGPkey-fingerprint: 6C0D 2353 27CF 80C7 901E FDD2 DBB0 7DC6 6F1F 737F X-Mailer: Mew version 6.8 on Emacs 26.3 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Multipart/Signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512; boundary="--Security_Multipart(Mon_Jun_22_22_40_15_2020_216)--" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 13:54:38 -0000 ----Security_Multipart(Mon_Jun_22_22_40_15_2020_216)-- Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit "Alexander V. Chernikov" wrote in <645741592773762@mail.yandex.ru>: me> [re-sending email with as non-html] me> me> Hey, me> me> I would like to deprecate net.inet6.ip6.deembed_scopeid sysctl while me> leaving the current default behaviour. me> me> This sysctl controls whether IPv6 scope is embedded in the IPv6 me> address or not when reading or writing route/interface/ifaddr data via me> rtsock/sysctl. me> me> Embedding scope in the address is a hack, that overwrites some of the me> bits that can be used otherwise. It was probably implemented that way me> to simplify route table interactions, as rtable uses this hack to add me> link-local addresses to the same radix tree. me> me> The change to fix the userland api by filling in sin6_scopeid and me> avoid touching IPv6 address was added in r243187, 7 years ago. It me> provided the sysctl in question, allowing to preserve compatibility me> with older applications, by reverting to the old behavior. me> me> 7 years looks like enough timeframe for the applications to be me> adjusted. Unless any major objections arise, I'm going to remove the me> code and make de-embedded IPv6 addresses the only option on July 5 me> 2020. I agree that it is time to remove it and I do not think we need to wait more. This knob was for debugging purpose rather than for keeping compatibility. A concern was that recovering the scopeid might have performance penalty. -- Hiroki ----Security_Multipart(Mon_Jun_22_22_40_15_2020_216)-- Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iMkEABMKAC4WIQRsDSNTJ8+Ax5Ae/dLbsH3Gbx9zfwUCXvC0vxAcaHJzQGZyZWVi c2Qub3JnAAoJENuwfcZvH3N/07gCCJDGMuuj3AcZoIfHbf+yrdGL/8Ox3/gnMw/C m3giiNCVHDSvWOgz/6/V+Tk0bOYuLcL95Y6V59sOIEojejYfm24fAgkBr48RfN4Z 8cTc1TGkjupVEebByICBQV4nAQYMj6naQd+A5nxOwZEfDsqpouqQmxLCVu/O5b2u rygd5E9CTMlJQPw= =suQy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ----Security_Multipart(Mon_Jun_22_22_40_15_2020_216)---- From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Mon Jun 22 13:54:40 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10B6A34CC16 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 13:54:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hrs@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49r9rb5bQhz4qXH for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 13:54:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hrs@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id A8FE234CC13; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 13:54:39 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A852634CC92; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 13:54:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hrs@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::24b:4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49r9rb3z12z4q6W; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 13:54:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hrs@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2400:4051:a743:3c00:16:ceff:fe34:2700]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: hrs) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7643F32D7D; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 13:54:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hrs@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 22:46:21 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20200622.224621.1160033569666141710.hrs@FreeBSD.org> To: melifaro@freebsd.org Cc: current@freebsd.org, net@freebsd.org, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: routed && route6d removal proposal From: Hiroki Sato In-Reply-To: <273191592779927@mail.yandex.ru> References: <273191592779927@mail.yandex.ru> X-Old-PGPkey-fingerprint: BDB3 443F A5DD B3D0 A530 FFD7 4F2C D3D8 2793 CF2D X-PGPkey-fingerprint: 6C0D 2353 27CF 80C7 901E FDD2 DBB0 7DC6 6F1F 737F X-Mailer: Mew version 6.8 on Emacs 26.3 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Multipart/Signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512; boundary="--Security_Multipart(Mon_Jun_22_22_46_21_2020_256)--" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 13:54:40 -0000 ----Security_Multipart(Mon_Jun_22_22_46_21_2020_256)-- Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit "Alexander V. Chernikov" wrote in <273191592779927@mail.yandex.ru>: me> Hey, me> me> I would like to propose removal of sbin/routed and usr.sbin/route6d. I am still using both of them in production environments because they work well at least for my configurations and most of promising alternatives are under GPL, not BSDL. Why do we need to rush to remove them? Discussion about whether we should keep or remove such old bits tends to be controversial when there is a user like me. I would agree with the removal if they were harmful or impossible to maintain, but would not for the reason that they are simply old and probably no one uses it today. Reason 1 and 2 look like the latter at least to me. "too old to be worth keeping" is a matter of degree. Uucp, rlogind, and timed should be removed (and were removed) because there are few non-FreeBSD platforms which support these protocols. RIP is still widely supported---just like FTP, which nowadays no one prefers to use and major www browsers are about to drop the support of---and not be considered an inherently vulnerable protocol like telnet. And keeping these daemons is not harmful even for users who want to use third-party routing daemons you listed. me> 1.1. Nowadays the daemon name is simply misleading. Given situation me> described above, one does expect far wider functionality from the me> program named "route[6]d" than just RIP implementation. I do not think this is a good reason to remove something nor people have got confused actually. If this is true, quagga or bird are much worse. me> 2. Multiple routing stacks supporting all major routing protocol me> including RIP exists these days: bird, frr, quagga. Many BGP-only me> designs in are gaining popularity, so do bgp speakers such as exabgp me> or gobgp. Nowadays, if one needs dynamic routing on the host, OSPF or me> BGP speaker is the choice. FreeBSD packages contains well-maintained me> ports for these. Having RIP[ng] speakers in base offers no advantage. me> me> 3. Both routed/route6d are largely unmaintained [4] and presents an me> additional attack vector. Here is the list of last non-trivial commits me> to routed/route6d: I think this is a separate issue. What attack vectors which are known to be vulnerable do they have? The small commit counts are not equal to its unreliability. Older daemons such as ppp(8), dhclient(8), ftpd(8), or bootpd(8) have received few substantial changes in recent years because they are mature. I am not a strong protester and will be happy to keep them as ports if everyone wants to remove them and it will happen, but I would like consistent criteria on removing software in the base system (they do not need to be perfect nor strict, though). I believe harmfulness is more important than the fact that it is old or we have more choices in the ports tree. If we have negative factors on maintaining them, removing them would be one of the choices as a result. If the existing routed/route6d makes difficulty on people who want to use third-party routing daemons, it should be fixed. These kind of harmfulness look below the threshold to me at this moment though I may be biased because I am still using them today... -- Hiroki ----Security_Multipart(Mon_Jun_22_22_46_21_2020_256)-- Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iMkEABMKAC4WIQRsDSNTJ8+Ax5Ae/dLbsH3Gbx9zfwUCXvC2LRAcaHJzQGZyZWVi c2Qub3JnAAoJENuwfcZvH3N/CMoCAwU3QXmLf0e6VHa4PKuZaDhhGrYPIu8NDMyA 1cifIfh2FZZZ9zKRnbag7ruFlWGHdiwXdznVKJPElL3n1NM2IdFlAgkBgStnQlfP hI2LJd+sQihZYyltMumHnbaAUcrfq+NlfFSKjUvYcO9dnS+bzRK4HEd6FDr58L5d 9YydnNdsQXzK1UA= =j9L7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ----Security_Multipart(Mon_Jun_22_22_46_21_2020_256)---- From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Mon Jun 22 13:55:28 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1152034CEA9 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 13:55:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tuexen@freebsd.org) Received: from drew.franken.de (mail-n.franken.de [193.175.24.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.franken.de", Issuer "Sectigo RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49r9sW338Vz4qrK; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 13:55:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tuexen@freebsd.org) Received: from [IPv6:2a02:8109:1140:c3d:fd51:4cdd:960c:aca5] (unknown [IPv6:2a02:8109:1140:c3d:fd51:4cdd:960c:aca5]) (Authenticated sender: macmic) by mail-n.franken.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EDEEC7220C6D0; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 15:55:23 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.80.23.2.2\)) Subject: Re: ? ????? ??: vnc can't connect to socket From: Michael Tuexen In-Reply-To: <202006212112.05LLCKQR006977@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 15:55:23 +0200 Cc: Ian Lepore , "bergerkos@yahoo.co.uk" , "freebsd-current@freebsd.org" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <3E06883E-BAB1-4E1A-AB20-06DD1F812057@freebsd.org> References: <202006212112.05LLCKQR006977@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> To: "Rodney W. Grimes" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.23.2.2) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=disabled version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on mail-n.franken.de X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49r9sW338Vz4qrK X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.00 / 15.00]; local_wl_from(0.00)[freebsd.org]; ASN(0.00)[asn:680, ipnet:193.174.0.0/15, country:DE] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 13:55:28 -0000 > On 21. Jun 2020, at 23:12, Rodney W. Grimes = wrote: >=20 >>> On Sun, 2020-06-21 at 14:54 +0200, Michael Tuexen wrote: >>>>> On 21. Jun 2020, at 14:28, Kostya Berger >>>>> wrote: >>>>>=20 >>>>> Ok, it turns out, it gives the previously mentioned error only if = I >>>>> use VNC server string 0.0.0.0:5900 (as I always did). in my VNC >>>>> client.But when replaced with127.0.0.1:5900it connects all right. >>>>=20 >>>> I don't hink 0.0.0.0 is a valid destination address you can use in >>>> connect(). Using 127.0.0.1 should >>>> be fine. >>=20 >> I do not believe that this is a destination address when your talking >> about 0.0.0.0:5900 on the VNC server side, that is a wild card accept >> any address and if this has been broken.. it must be fixed! >>=20 >>>> I guess, https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/361752 is the >>>> relevant commit here. >>>>=20 >>>=20 >>> *BSD has always accepted 0 as a synonym for localhost (and iirc, = linux >>> does not). If this no longer works, it's a regression which is = going >>> to cause existing applications and scripts to fail. At the very = least >>> it deserves an entry in UPDATING. >>=20 >> I am not aware of that, but can not deny it either, and just = confirmed >> it to be true: >> root {1002}# telnet 0.0.0.0 22 >> Trying 0.0.0.0... >> Connected to 0.0.0.0. >> Escape character is '^]'. >> SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_7.8 FreeBSD-20180909 >=20 > And to add the netstat data to show what connected: > tcp4 0 0 127.0.0.1.22 127.0.0.1.43135 = ESTABLISHED > tcp4 38 0 127.0.0.1.43135 127.0.0.1.22 = ESTABLISHED >=20 > Can we back this commit out, discuss it in next weeks call, > and then find a way forward? >=20 >>=20 >> INADDR_ANY is the wildcard listen address, but as a destination what = code remapped >> it to 127.0.0.1? >>=20 >> We should very seriously consider restoring this behavior. Reallowing 0.0.0.0 is covered by https://reviews.freebsd.org/D25401 Best regards Michael >>=20 >>> -- Ian >>>=20 >>>> Best regards >>>> Michael >>>>> ?????????? ?? Yahoo ????? ??? Android=20 >>>>>=20 >>>>> ??, 21 ???. 2020 ? 9:40 Kostya Berger >>>>> ???????(-?): Hi,upgraded to 362292 via buildworld.Now I cannot >>>>> connect to my bhyve guest as I used to: neither via VNC nor via >>>>> RDP.VNC gets error: unable to connect the socket. Address family >>>>> not supported by protocol family (47). >>>>> Neither can I ping my bhyve IP (it uses a separate NIC and should >>>>> have no problems) >>>>> Internet connectivity is ok and I can ping other hosts on my >>>>> network. >>>>> In 359997 all works fine. >>>>> ?????????? ?? Yahoo ????? ??? Android =20 >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list >>>>> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current >>>>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to " >>>>> freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>>>=20 >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list >>>> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current >>>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to " >>>> freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>>>=20 >>>=20 >>> _______________________________________________ >>> freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list >>> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>>=20 >>>=20 >>=20 >> --=20 >> Rod Grimes = rgrimes@freebsd.org >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list >> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>=20 >=20 > --=20 > Rod Grimes = rgrimes@freebsd.org From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Mon Jun 22 14:12:03 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB1A534D90D for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 14:12:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bergerkos@yahoo.co.uk) Received: from sonic310-11.consmr.mail.ir2.yahoo.com (sonic310-11.consmr.mail.ir2.yahoo.com [77.238.177.32]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49rBDf5V09z4sNv for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 14:12:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bergerkos@yahoo.co.uk) X-YMail-OSG: RyjcK2cVM1n4LbZd6GLLl6bj.KcDnZxlZuccRZXGmzGlKv5XyDURKcWb9jpKOET TNkwfJRtrXQY5yrMYwhVnOwS4HnlacdMHr1zvj064Micsqw06x9YJrwH3AeyXb_PL_0eoQ6JwSWE oMOfVh17av1W6SGrmuchatUVrDMRF66M1WQaoLdaeUNfvgVOr5fL9.BRbPIK7OWfsz_EEZrHxIei dPchQWghWc1BL.wxsCGceLguDweV.8yRp6ricUJq9GmzLAnzsJUTiZO09rf8USJAacdPGeZ8cexI h7hYzV0yM0.TUSsu8ZrjVoAoUxmCOxUVUl_u.pvb1e3_MC7pfCPFR_f8dwI6WZ78RAa0x7oze7xx rBS8xHXXKCWXYDFp1qcdwiJZBGhB_zEtwbhgMjkuC56GW7f7xOvdNi.b5cJ4VV.QtaOuBCS2SF68 biipZtRjtAVPPvaTLUAUA92OmFMLy8ras7kvDYMn.W3Pk10kSR9buTkR46d8r7JZv14cszerNP.h Y_LoyuB10vb7u356.OBfonk8OCuRoY2FAf6Q6H4Gk0CGc5BJ0AiaKrht3mVeHZaqqgC9JziqFX.m 3h75vvHwwp3yLcTCMXC_OVJS3MTWRQfaq8CevZLxKQ_ODD9A8R2PKa2_oSZ_hpJ9ZslE9K84YskW eUiffOoytdHp.hMz8.b.d3D.b_fhtcb3YRVPHPgvpoATJWMnOWyOk5VHFu7rn1xYZEC02CjQAF.j jqWobov6hLeWycABwE5MviX2v5XrB9odyXyOM90E_Dy122a3A7aNt3OSB27T1dQvVIGvJ30HIuya 6rfrTI5kUsU3Ts3eT7Pzf3oSgVoYlQ0NYnCxFNbBfLzPxaD6HlYvHGURwWc2mZuaHOc396bCaffe AUYVpKzJP9GCFMFm7oJYRCcorhy2z746lvHUFUdWeYVcx.7fSAgbAT6lH6qzvgiXDM7y59xOmF8t mYoeNjEhWwd_isvxN0KL6FFoKkZKSDH1HPeNsMA02ubY_jfwXB7_2JCtq0nnb_SA4rqDxrjdzqUY aHdzKKa6ihapMYuvgeHrVMiUkrPZWqraCTcXk9CYGqqpycjVBTa6BYrp4IEZUzQZnYUC65F6BUmZ cqFWdr4NajpCHMvnZITg40YFf8WBOyc0zUZ37L6g0XPxmtJPdvZCGFowAYuIvZnXUHqgVP_oKp6g 4bVhRxm1V4ZaV7CB68VSiHecF9jh6n66G2Jx1Ilo_aMrqn6BV2dgUKkxH7esSTYMcR_v.cilNEFe FOrbPqPK2okfdcaHT6UYHl9g9iRQ9w7sM6X_nU7FiStexfpZRyaPQZQkg.fwpAO12iJjuY0o7nMP vLzR0crP9x7DaNg.yv3ChCYetz3PW3DKFj5jACwB_Oos24aM- Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic310.consmr.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with HTTP; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 14:12:01 +0000 Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 14:11:57 +0000 (UTC) From: Kostya Berger To: "Rodney W. Grimes" , Michael Tuexen Cc: Ian Lepore , "freebsd-current@freebsd.org" Message-ID: <1182799644.3507612.1592835117691@mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <3E06883E-BAB1-4E1A-AB20-06DD1F812057@freebsd.org> References: <202006212112.05LLCKQR006977@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> <3E06883E-BAB1-4E1A-AB20-06DD1F812057@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: ? ????? ??: vnc can't connect to socket MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: WebService/1.1.16138 YMailNorrin Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:77.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/77.0 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49rBDf5V09z4sNv X-Spamd-Bar: ---- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.08 / 15.00]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_SOME(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[yahoo.co.uk:s=s2048]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.01)[-1.012]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[yahoo.co.uk]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ptr:yahoo.com]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-0.999]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[yahoo.co.uk:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[yahoo.co.uk,reject]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[77.238.177.32:from]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.07)[-1.073]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[yahoo.co.uk]; ASN(0.00)[asn:34010, ipnet:77.238.176.0/22, country:GB]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; SUBJECT_HAS_QUESTION(0.00)[]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[77.238.177.32:from] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.33 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 14:12:03 -0000 BTW, I was not using it purposefully. I think I used it because it was sugg= ested by TigerVNC viewer itself. The original connect dialogue, I think, ha= d that address in it. So I used it, and it worked. This is how I remember i= t. Other than that I NEVER used this wildcard address unless suggested by d= ocumentation in certain configurations. With kindest regards, Kostya Berger =20 =20 On Monday, 22 June 2020, 16:56:41 GMT+3, Michael Tuexen wrote: =20 =20 > On 21. Jun 2020, at 23:12, Rodney W. Grimes wrote: >=20 >>> On Sun, 2020-06-21 at 14:54 +0200, Michael Tuexen wrote: >>>>> On 21. Jun 2020, at 14:28, Kostya Berger >>>>> wrote: >>>>>=20 >>>>> Ok, it turns out, it gives the previously mentioned error only if I >>>>> use VNC server string 0.0.0.0:5900 (as I always did). in my VNC >>>>> client.But when replaced with127.0.0.1:5900it connects all right. >>>>=20 >>>> I don't hink 0.0.0.0 is a valid destination address you can use in >>>> connect(). Using 127.0.0.1 should >>>> be fine. >>=20 >> I do not believe that this is a destination address when your talking >> about 0.0.0.0:5900 on the VNC server side, that is a wild card accept >> any address and if this has been broken.. it must be fixed! >>=20 >>>> I guess, https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/361752 is the >>>> relevant commit here. >>>>=20 >>>=20 >>> *BSD has always accepted 0 as a synonym for localhost (and iirc, linux >>> does not).=C2=A0 If this no longer works, it's a regression which is go= ing >>> to cause existing applications and scripts to fail.=C2=A0 At the very l= east >>> it deserves an entry in UPDATING. >>=20 >> I am not aware of that, but can not deny it either, and just confirmed >> it to be true: >> root {1002}# telnet 0.0.0.0 22 >> Trying 0.0.0.0... >> Connected to 0.0.0.0. >> Escape character is '^]'. >> SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_7.8 FreeBSD-20180909 >=20 > And to add the netstat data to show what connected: > tcp4=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 0=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 0 127.0.0.1.22=C2=A0 =C2= =A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 127.0.0.1.43135=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 ESTABLI= SHED > tcp4=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 38=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 0 127.0.0.1.43135=C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 127.0.0.1.22=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 ESTABLI= SHED >=20 > Can we back this commit out, discuss it in next weeks call, > and then find a way forward? >=20 >>=20 >> INADDR_ANY is the wildcard listen address, but as a destination what cod= e remapped >> it to 127.0.0.1? >>=20 >> We should very seriously consider restoring this behavior. Reallowing 0.0.0.0 is covered by https://reviews.freebsd.org/D25401 Best regards Michael >>=20 >>> -- Ian >>>=20 >>>> Best regards >>>> Michael >>>>> ?????????? ?? Yahoo ????? ??? Android=20 >>>>>=20 >>>>> ??, 21 ???. 2020 ? 9:40 Kostya Berger >>>>> ???????(-?):=C2=A0 Hi,upgraded to 362292 via buildworld.Now I cannot >>>>> connect to my bhyve guest as I used to: neither via VNC nor via >>>>> RDP.VNC gets error: unable to connect the socket. Address family >>>>> not supported by protocol family (47). >>>>> Neither can I ping my bhyve IP (it uses a separate NIC and should >>>>> have no problems) >>>>> Internet connectivity is ok and I can ping other hosts on my >>>>> network. >>>>> In 359997 all works fine. >>>>> ?????????? ?? Yahoo ????? ??? Android=C2=A0=20 >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list >>>>> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current >>>>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to " >>>>> freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>>>=20 >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list >>>> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current >>>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to " >>>> freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>>>=20 >>>=20 >>> _______________________________________________ >>> freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list >>> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" >>>=20 >>>=20 >>=20 >> --=20 >> Rod Grimes=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0= =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2= =A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 rgrimes@freebsd.org >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list >> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.or= g" >>=20 >=20 > --=20 > Rod Grimes=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2= =A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 rgrimes@freebsd.org _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" =20 From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Mon Jun 22 14:57:38 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 405A434EA0F for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 14:57:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wlosh@bsdimp.com) Received: from mail-qt1-x829.google.com (mail-qt1-x829.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::829]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49rCFF3xq7z3Rjs for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 14:57:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wlosh@bsdimp.com) Received: by mail-qt1-x829.google.com with SMTP id i3so3320126qtq.13 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 07:57:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bsdimp-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Dyirvr4ZtiCs8D744ane26paI0xPkhMmgj77m2Q6Pec=; b=doND5NcPOo27yjYrzY/BOX21jXz09O2YhJhtJK8ztMTAJiA3Nnxenjm4i5wUmJolZ+ PpjtePXFBKO3QbbLu1Tj6rQQwt5wLATsF1Rrl8g9sMOHmq5GGId9C/z0lEnNfonuWH5c XfaYrzdiyVtHSvMUuACgpDD9mFC8fPxMcbQdkUEpws4tV4N6fwT4pL/WtWA8PUlAx5nZ RRRirqpwappcbgdXQqlQUT4l3RNHnPzaEGE+fby5WU5+uzr9kAJ47NGsFqZ9J+fN3a4T wV8QgqPj3S+L0aWCiAP5zwZqYKXDJsOMSFmc05a5iXMb+9dylfLt9kv52gAPS4arBpA9 PZQw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Dyirvr4ZtiCs8D744ane26paI0xPkhMmgj77m2Q6Pec=; b=ptRCm4pPJkul1ju7gNBWytiFgNpNfXW9DmVYV1q2eOq+BxHrH/Bawlf+G3AZJRVkdR /JMZdHh+uGlj2FjlNPV6vIf9EW8uxh4PM6gUIVUb1A7GyAzPC6A1tOeIbPDEcLe7HfbK mu84itu+7d5neORFQghueuk71LdznV0Mqj0l3uyyne0cbOnsxfzQK5On9zoy8s0Ib4x9 lx7NvLLc+ZCshdyR+De4/SdZhgy6K+/wNo66mOj5CYsqncxpL/uVOTfXBt0yOEJiSl0z 0gwianmTH6TvCc0d4LIcHttIBcf69Q7e/UpOh7jpqtQNptepVW8gTaXDQqbQ61dlojPw kswQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531clrAkmHxhyUN5GbtsQwFnG/ypFF7OkqDDet+Qm/BDJ+6rc8Zx 0LfTIcQoCSKGk9z6dIL859XD76XLfCO4aRYCeav/baLkjKk= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyCAwqimxfqUhxVIxKxzJCZfuZ2emsJBRo7DihU/6IGrGpojIlIeFiyxQohuj8jE5o482p/IPo8ZAAVr7SIwss= X-Received: by 2002:aed:3386:: with SMTP id v6mr17227021qtd.187.1592837855821; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 07:57:35 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200619.052348.232031363704679601.yasu@utahime.org> <20200622.164523.492970231904065687.yasu@utahime.org> <20200622.191348.2299220192956341788.yasu@utahime.org> In-Reply-To: <20200622.191348.2299220192956341788.yasu@utahime.org> From: Warner Losh Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 08:57:24 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: `shutdown -p now` fails to power off with VirtualBox UEFI boot To: Yasuhiro KIMURA Cc: FreeBSD Current X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49rCFF3xq7z3Rjs X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=bsdimp-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=doND5NcP; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of wlosh@bsdimp.com has no SPF policy when checking 2607:f8b0:4864:20::829) smtp.mailfrom=wlosh@bsdimp.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.42 / 15.00]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[bsdimp-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com:s=20150623]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.94)[-0.940]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.99)[-0.992]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-current@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[bsdimp.com]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[bsdimp-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::829:from]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.49)[-0.491]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[imp@bsdimp.com,wlosh@bsdimp.com]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[imp@bsdimp.com,wlosh@bsdimp.com] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.33 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 14:57:38 -0000 On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 4:14 AM Yasuhiro KIMURA wrote: > From: Yasuhiro KIMURA > Subject: Re: `shutdown -p now` fails to power off with VirtualBox UEFI boot > Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 16:45:23 +0900 (JST) > > > I tried bisect and found this problem happens with r342108 and > > after. Commit message of r342108 says as following. > > > > yasu@rolling-vm-freebsd5[1012]% LANG=C svn log -c 342108 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > r342108 | cem | 2018-12-15 14:46:04 +0900 (Sat, 15 Dec 2018) | 7 lines > > > > efirt: When present, attempt to use EFI runtime services to shutdown > > > > PR: maybe related to 233998 (inconclusive at this time) > > Submitted by: byuu (previous version) > > Reviewed by: imp > > Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D18506 > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > yasu@rolling-vm-freebsd5[1013]% > > > > Judging from it, I think it's very likely that this commit caused the > > problem. > > > > Then is there anything I can do for further investigation? > > I submitted this problem to Bugzilla. > > Bug 247474 - `shutdown -p now` fails to power off with VirtualBox UEFI boot > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247474 > Does setting the tunable hw.efi.poweroff=0 help you? Warner > --- > Yasuhiro KIMURA > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Mon Jun 22 15:14:51 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E51534F636 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 15:14:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tuexen@freebsd.org) Received: from drew.franken.de (drew.ipv6.franken.de [IPv6:2001:638:a02:a001:20e:cff:fe4a:feaa]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.franken.de", Issuer "Sectigo RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49rCd61X2Hz3T9p for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 15:14:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tuexen@freebsd.org) Received: from [IPv6:2a02:8109:1140:c3d:fd51:4cdd:960c:aca5] (unknown [IPv6:2a02:8109:1140:c3d:fd51:4cdd:960c:aca5]) (Authenticated sender: macmic) by mail-n.franken.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CCA9A7220C6D0; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 17:14:45 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.80.23.2.2\)) Subject: Re: `shutdown -p now` fails to power off with VirtualBox UEFI boot From: Michael Tuexen In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 17:14:45 +0200 Cc: Yasuhiro KIMURA , FreeBSD Current Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <20200619.052348.232031363704679601.yasu@utahime.org> <20200622.164523.492970231904065687.yasu@utahime.org> <20200622.191348.2299220192956341788.yasu@utahime.org> To: Warner Losh X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.23.2.2) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=disabled version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on mail-n.franken.de X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49rCd61X2Hz3T9p X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.00 / 15.00]; ASN(0.00)[asn:680, ipnet:2001:638::/32, country:DE]; local_wl_from(0.00)[freebsd.org] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 15:14:51 -0000 > On 22. Jun 2020, at 16:57, Warner Losh wrote: >=20 > On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 4:14 AM Yasuhiro KIMURA = wrote: >=20 >> From: Yasuhiro KIMURA >> Subject: Re: `shutdown -p now` fails to power off with VirtualBox = UEFI boot >> Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 16:45:23 +0900 (JST) >>=20 >>> I tried bisect and found this problem happens with r342108 and >>> after. Commit message of r342108 says as following. >>>=20 >>> yasu@rolling-vm-freebsd5[1012]% LANG=3DC svn log -c 342108 >>> = ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> r342108 | cem | 2018-12-15 14:46:04 +0900 (Sat, 15 Dec 2018) | 7 = lines >>>=20 >>> efirt: When present, attempt to use EFI runtime services to shutdown >>>=20 >>> PR: maybe related to 233998 (inconclusive at this time) >>> Submitted by: byuu (previous version) >>> Reviewed by: imp >>> Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D18506 >>>=20 >>> = ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> yasu@rolling-vm-freebsd5[1013]% >>>=20 >>> Judging from it, I think it's very likely that this commit caused = the >>> problem. >>>=20 >>> Then is there anything I can do for further investigation? >>=20 >> I submitted this problem to Bugzilla. >>=20 >> Bug 247474 - `shutdown -p now` fails to power off with VirtualBox = UEFI boot >> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D247474 >>=20 >=20 > Does setting the tunable hw.efi.poweroff=3D0 help you? That works for me (FreeBSD head on Virtual Box, latest release, on Mac = OS). Best regards Michael >=20 > Warner >=20 >=20 >> --- >> Yasuhiro KIMURA >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list >> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>=20 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Mon Jun 22 15:40:30 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BB2D33059E for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 15:40:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yasu@utahime.org) Received: from gate.utahime.jp (gate.utahime.jp [183.180.29.210]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49rDBh43Jyz3WYC for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 15:40:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yasu@utahime.org) Received: from eastasia.home.utahime.org (eastasia.home.utahime.org [192.168.174.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by gate.utahime.jp (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 185E425D4 for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 00:40:19 +0900 (JST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=utahime.org; s=maybe2019112701; t=1592840419; bh=W/vkAd9c8lyWrh7LxMgTWHgLFZMC2JkUCzmF/aG9VNQ=; h=Date:To:Subject:From:In-Reply-To:References; b=CoWgCLfEDXHvZ7r9QOCDr6x8WOKA/gKHOD/Q8q9IbvrlDHq4nRClelg0H/yw6etFz mxwwPWk7/RAid846U7whN5vuR8KfCLerm22yM2wVYq+RvuYkYwHaletEF8Vy4IbWrM iE/QXcJHnF8Sc6Kdm54M16uFH5K/92bj6pAYPBA9JYzEfpjVWDzHxX2lr1R1egDAB+ vnjTf+oEZ6fr7TNmWSY4gchF7WE18E5/ANaLYZo83ZRce6duupFkNfYY9jpn+8EgbE +vT9SYsHAazu3fd+483jGCGVv9fJob/91Xbyd4WRTzbRz5fv1+jOBynb65DWUANYge 0DyeQQkk6OkKQ== Received: from localhost (rolling.home.utahime.org [192.168.174.11]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by eastasia.home.utahime.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AD9404C30E; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 00:40:17 +0900 (JST) X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.102.3 at eastasia.home.utahime.org Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 00:38:08 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20200623.003808.2170454908846294820.yasu@utahime.org> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: `shutdown -p now` fails to power off with VirtualBox UEFI boot From: Yasuhiro KIMURA In-Reply-To: References: <20200622.164523.492970231904065687.yasu@utahime.org> <20200622.191348.2299220192956341788.yasu@utahime.org> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.8 on Emacs 26.3 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49rDBh43Jyz3WYC X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=utahime.org header.s=maybe2019112701 header.b=CoWgCLfE; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of yasu@utahime.org designates 183.180.29.210 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=yasu@utahime.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.43 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[utahime.org:s=maybe2019112701]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.02)[-1.023]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-current@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.03)[-1.031]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[utahime.org]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+a:spf-authorized.utahime.org]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[utahime.org:+]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.37)[-0.372]; MID_CONTAINS_FROM(1.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:2519, ipnet:183.180.0.0/16, country:JP]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 15:40:30 -0000 From: Warner Losh Subject: Re: `shutdown -p now` fails to power off with VirtualBox UEFI boot Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 08:57:24 -0600 > Does setting the tunable hw.efi.poweroff=0 help you? I add it to /boot/loader.conf and then `shutdown -p now` successfully powers off system. Does existence of this tunable mean that there are some UEFI implementations that have problem with power off functionality? (And VirtualBox is unfortunately one of such implementations?) --- Yasuhiro KIMURA From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Mon Jun 22 16:13:07 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AACB033220C for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 16:13:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wlosh@bsdimp.com) Received: from mail-qt1-x835.google.com (mail-qt1-x835.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::835]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49rDwH6yRtz3f5K for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 16:13:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wlosh@bsdimp.com) Received: by mail-qt1-x835.google.com with SMTP id v19so10592523qtq.10 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 09:13:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bsdimp-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=6HMVHcOYXBOKMOkpQFchvniDLdNmsE2P020ux8OUZI8=; b=M5bGgh0D/CkV71fnvbnAREU0iHbBuYox77JH4NLyyJ9CDm22qPuoX31rjud4Seoa8A Oz4MQRL18f3gRMDLyhidGsdPavTaMw6tY/xrjhVgVW7ZiTvKJklmuOZ6Whxr90khjmzE 8zyGzw2/TLpaxSL41KBc48L+ya2g7Y4tDfVQx17lo8GYy0WP5B3/6IV296pD6cT6NdQC 9GnBHUYrn6aFMfnR36UmzSaYfC//zDkAEAT1wItsPJoSqZtPnK3zS1EKDf8Bp9sYdRIw LviScSWi8J1Wum4yOWO6S+PhOaNBsBBfXqL2uJAiurQ4X4Pb5s2bfmpHW2t01CcCKZAE y2DQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=6HMVHcOYXBOKMOkpQFchvniDLdNmsE2P020ux8OUZI8=; b=sM+15e/t71zmz9wNLZnLZUgk6I6rpu4Ke+03EKqzuQlUsKxb7qt099s9/RjEdwG30/ u9JbRiJifbZcU9krvWnoTgBqyjJiRLezbtBsuFv5QEqrrxS2zIVjNjTAyu+I2ESZ2LPF SBe0VX+o5pZFkuz7MJ9kAHo1HktwP8DRV7OE6m5xac/s8DroUVUFz5CtFxRkXF8F6KO7 YXZZPvIMbQaTm9FUWany5kEZdAYQIxhsdVkRuvAnLPq0UIODKBpI1vGcUiOAGKcgWAWF PvizRSWYmaTjYCPABq1NJuq0lU95q6/cFZ0uCtgOIIHCjUOprqfUeYSsWouqeQFiipEj Crgg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533kzhooQuk3qPwREDv8BNIsp20zGMCK0hhMFPjUmO3btuj2jaIo Et76l8X7qT2Wqj6wkG7ECfeiC+9yL17Ww5e+qFopdnGXPPY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyOWWDS4eoMo9IQDMQMAxYJkDxPOI5xNPPIaPAi03Z/9BDPs6TUl4c8WVj+BdI7nTSbA6YpCJpFuTc11/8l1q4= X-Received: by 2002:ac8:6f55:: with SMTP id n21mr17260232qtv.175.1592842378315; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 09:12:58 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200622.164523.492970231904065687.yasu@utahime.org> <20200622.191348.2299220192956341788.yasu@utahime.org> <20200623.003808.2170454908846294820.yasu@utahime.org> In-Reply-To: <20200623.003808.2170454908846294820.yasu@utahime.org> From: Warner Losh Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 10:12:47 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: `shutdown -p now` fails to power off with VirtualBox UEFI boot To: Yasuhiro KIMURA Cc: FreeBSD Current X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49rDwH6yRtz3f5K X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=bsdimp-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=M5bGgh0D; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of wlosh@bsdimp.com has no SPF policy when checking 2607:f8b0:4864:20::835) smtp.mailfrom=wlosh@bsdimp.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.37 / 15.00]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[bsdimp-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com:s=20150623]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.94)[-0.940]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.99)[-0.993]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-current@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[bsdimp.com]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[bsdimp-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::835:from]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.44)[-0.440]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[imp@bsdimp.com,wlosh@bsdimp.com]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[imp@bsdimp.com,wlosh@bsdimp.com] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.33 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 16:13:08 -0000 On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 9:40 AM Yasuhiro KIMURA wrote: > From: Warner Losh > Subject: Re: `shutdown -p now` fails to power off with VirtualBox UEFI boot > Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 08:57:24 -0600 > > > Does setting the tunable hw.efi.poweroff=0 help you? > > I add it to /boot/loader.conf and then `shutdown -p now` successfully > powers off system. > > Does existence of this tunable mean that there are some UEFI > implementations that have problem with power off functionality? > (And VirtualBox is unfortunately one of such implementations?) > I believe so. However, I've not dived deeply enough into this problem to understand if it is a bug in our code or theirs. Warner > --- > Yasuhiro KIMURA > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Mon Jun 22 16:25:11 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70662333389 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 16:25:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yasu@utahime.org) Received: from gate.utahime.jp (gate.utahime.jp [183.180.29.210]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49rFBG3rhGz3yd2 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 16:25:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yasu@utahime.org) Received: from eastasia.home.utahime.org (eastasia.home.utahime.org [192.168.174.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by gate.utahime.jp (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CBE3D262F for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 01:25:06 +0900 (JST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=utahime.org; s=maybe2019112701; t=1592843106; bh=6iZ+/c0eUyC1zPsSyn6wgH+2P/moLtP/cfkqlVDSV/E=; h=Date:To:Subject:From:In-Reply-To:References; b=U2B0+7M+27CLuJcPZeaUf1kpUjW+m0ufgkzMpN/Rl59RHwm0jcmi/xZhO3Zsrrxf1 vfBfpv0uOekRjy6imZ/ysbNfeoltgdmrS5cY7s07q2MablHnLLaT1zJXu1TmdzhT5R +V/A0OJi3/YB0KEx/x/xTazXdC4KjEs8ahGVHytO4dIsUZgezSp7VjTK7Blytr7kNE GJhpNqBl2xyhh7PNd52OKlcDz1aEPOs6DLIkmA1ZcWqi1C73wUAj0CdbjJLipHtt2y G2GRGdx4MN8O2XS1ksSpaC4sUInK5gR8zZw603jwubvFHmSGOvlGEHprwtbWOdR8ys v8VKiBcd1ijTw== Received: from localhost (rolling.home.utahime.org [192.168.174.11]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by eastasia.home.utahime.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1D7904C3B0; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 01:25:04 +0900 (JST) X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.102.3 at eastasia.home.utahime.org Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 01:24:30 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20200623.012430.160851334924558473.yasu@utahime.org> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: `shutdown -p now` fails to power off with VirtualBox UEFI boot From: Yasuhiro KIMURA In-Reply-To: References: <20200623.003808.2170454908846294820.yasu@utahime.org> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.8 on Emacs 26.3 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49rFBG3rhGz3yd2 X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=utahime.org header.s=maybe2019112701 header.b=U2B0+7M+; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of yasu@utahime.org designates 183.180.29.210 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=yasu@utahime.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.52 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[utahime.org:s=maybe2019112701]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.02)[-1.023]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+a:spf-authorized.utahime.org:c]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-current@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.03)[-1.031]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[utahime.org]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[utahime.org:+]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.46)[-0.463]; MID_CONTAINS_FROM(1.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:2519, ipnet:183.180.0.0/16, country:JP]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 16:25:11 -0000 From: Warner Losh Subject: Re: `shutdown -p now` fails to power off with VirtualBox UEFI boot Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 10:12:47 -0600 > I believe so. However, I've not dived deeply enough into this problem to > understand if it is a bug in our code or theirs. I got it. Thank you for reply. --- Yasuhiro KIMURA From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Mon Jun 22 17:03:59 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49D33333F28 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 17:03:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bergerkos@yahoo.co.uk) Received: from sonic305-20.consmr.mail.ir2.yahoo.com (sonic305-20.consmr.mail.ir2.yahoo.com [77.238.177.82]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49rG3226J6z422l for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 17:03:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bergerkos@yahoo.co.uk) X-YMail-OSG: TllZ54YVM1mv4B0DZB5ha_tPDj27G5tT2aVjT7UhJoUVouiiFYLrYn1D0fPMujw M.Uz9KqJ4uBZwSYT8IwEhYnG2tvq.dYeV.WKRMQpBJ33in.8Bxjm34C0TDVy8sc9NCljfDWEWMsB uqehw1xEcU4LAsTjksCH4YLbeWqUY8OP851gBx.CLGXP4aCjtu3dpTR_EMgb5Dd3UsbFdXvg_RIK FPDjd7ynJ2QB8OpcDp6mfy2IKvRSv5I_zJh31LVAqBc4SGdGG4zPDh97yym5gptKgkn3LYTR.XFi ass8DzEplHj7K84oghxkaTrkdrDI5clEpzNo.HegqoRIqtyikcQtkLpR2JvqWAGcDRTSFUOSCGHx 0se84bjOEICt2K8wSeE7OYZyO71qOZ9Oi8AGLH7GFmd00sEODlKNMU3rpyIQHJ9eJTkZHzJx9Oyc 28i8y1o1kuwBN5f8ESYUCbc_N2pWlZxkZnYx.zpwqrBOH4tPaTbDab4C0Xwr8zyDsvQmJXLNAtSC mP2JMdarwQTbxhHI8mijhUHshHYOc0f8olb4nt6Gz3KQrY2GdFLCm8.tkXigstt813R4oxWJrTeD 4u1z2vphMVNdOovC_Eh.2MAfsuRGXGEYy4.wUU98G96u8h0INGFww54JGAxOP0hFupGSwDROViil TEMXiV.GbW_0lggQ_jtJVj6x_kuRPpkhKs3iXFI.sh6X2uoLCr7YiZuJ8YgvjVVhgB_6_.BY7Ijq Blhw1bHogmGmdezNbEviUEGnXA6LZ9NMQMK3vleppTzaAJlXK0vbREdwVM4xK5brkW.nz.b5GKm9 HA78aEYlnCnrBF07T2d_53hrUFFwrQsCkgP.uf4809ewk1rXspixKNIoTvEz1teJSuS28zaqgPox PBxLfeY_udgLIW3Ri8rMpDdUU4mJzRwwLbqUwF0yWYXpdqbYeQg2vzvl0pD5ymKrn4PUhuwvQbV5 xg9GvKtJegaQZlrJsxTdMLw5bJVkwhtDEvyrpZYPDaUU6b_YDYayZ37_YKdhg8h15rXzTaEqrPQU 4Ja4qQTiBrteega0zo_JjClwZ7U62mKk7qaZaL6aYqCf_BoPSzS2azBjlFiJsgLq4CegcCNjJtom f9mevZ055Gh2Gp7fAOs6sitJv29or3RMqT8ZqWw23PAXqGg07RPraiEPO58u5Ci29fJPEpYMaLnX q4.wHDpldCoaPxqxLdhivyEdACBERE8R8wfmlYXzdVY_PU0CqpUu_bLSu4m72u6spGm7vFALMaKG QtTrPuMPnpw8LUut0CtrLpx3cunQETR0BLOF_WsCA82I56a7heGBT7k7De5fTRtPqJ.tO7dhLTqw qju9HdggqkxjdGOGIDz33amnz Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic305.consmr.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with HTTP; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 17:03:56 +0000 Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 17:03:51 +0000 (UTC) From: Kostya Berger To: Freebsd-current Message-ID: <1240905853.3700064.1592845431061@mail.yahoo.com> Subject: editors/libreoffice PDF export/printing broken MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1240905853.3700064.1592845431061.ref@mail.yahoo.com> X-Mailer: WebService/1.1.16138 YMailNorrin Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:77.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/77.0 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49rG3226J6z422l X-Spamd-Bar: --- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.79 / 15.00]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[yahoo.co.uk:s=s2048]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.002]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_GOOD(0.00)[77.238.177.82:from]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[yahoo.co.uk]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ptr:yahoo.com]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.01)[-1.013]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[yahoo.co.uk:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[yahoo.co.uk,reject]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[77.238.177.82:from]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.77)[-0.772]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[yahoo.co.uk]; ASN(0.00)[asn:34010, ipnet:77.238.176.0/22, country:GB]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.33 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 17:03:59 -0000 r362292In editors/libreoffice 6.4.4 PDF export is broken, including also PDF print to file. Tried with locally built 6.4.4 and pre-built package 6.4.4.2 from official repo (separate installation for testing purposes). Symptoms: of all content only graphics/tables elements get exported to PDF. No text. PS printing is all right.As regards PDF printing to file in general, it still works fine in Firefox. Only LO is affected. I filed a bug report as well. With kindest regards, Kostya Berger From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Mon Jun 22 17:21:48 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 963223346E2 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 17:21:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 6yearold@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lj1-x22f.google.com (mail-lj1-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22f]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49rGRb657Zz43wC for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 17:21:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 6yearold@gmail.com) Received: by mail-lj1-x22f.google.com with SMTP id i27so20205817ljb.12 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 10:21:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=nsSapELGiWulx8t5Gapm+N3NuRKI5kWY2zfU0cIL9Yc=; b=iW94qkvgZL3onoZ4sEP7ESJEZa7YqpkkElb/p5c2CQDQC3TDvgOKUV1BtG3gaXgUR+ gq69cdLUUZqDCV0ba3i05o+WPOk54AxB67/ulCS+0ztdNoqpcwJtFye0wG/DKUaA3ZZA o/2UW7+6aPvK3qOj1YB/ADUm6xyOFb1eUzDIUxikTkfx4dodl3M89/0ROoajFeX6L0Ep fHbcD4E0J6NqmvMzV1PvVWdxRMSGMd0Q+CWExf2yMQ811B0rAhwDCqyeEb4C5fpy4ymb bNNTsrOTmkI6RGwJ6+F7Ge5bwcl1Da30cUgD0/xbFne8Pf3xm0LhD+aKdA1m+EBAO88m yxZw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=nsSapELGiWulx8t5Gapm+N3NuRKI5kWY2zfU0cIL9Yc=; b=FxAwyD8WTEsfBzHgqXezw/HV3leuloY42Vfev/580S70sb+ash4PXcQHafzGdJAOWa f1tOBoqOAxECxg0qc7bVHmLs1gEzsVGChkkwLgsmsDchwhVLWCia1I1T8vNpae7PCnlj qL3wxebjUgYJmn8Y97EWBOVAUsR02UCRsybeuSt6XKFPUN/QeNlzeYMydO6gUUy65EKa MdZnWMthFM2KGXkDD8pGgoghHpw45wz1BD/KjTseLETXq8InHTsM3e1k0W37hb1azYYb UDsh7HYnOHM641HOBFXewClNaWz7hmfcy4QfANzTb8N+DpOKcsAVWttFpfsabfLhlTjZ pdmw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532+/Om3bhkmOVALbGCMaat5zkTldUnaHa358l+1iydm+Nk4g9qx RsglQbR6unIpN+V7risAvlvT63U+LdF0Od1aWCQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwx+bp46/5pG97NBFpWT/keHLMgGS5sJ9/JZkoMR5MqfOn4HR4eUIGFw/7JcyakMYKN7dK9FTPE9EzzqYG6Uos= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:b8d4:: with SMTP id s20mr9398787ljp.177.1592846505661; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 10:21:45 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1240905853.3700064.1592845431061.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <1240905853.3700064.1592845431061@mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <1240905853.3700064.1592845431061@mail.yahoo.com> From: Gleb Popov <6yearold@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 21:21:19 +0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: editors/libreoffice PDF export/printing broken To: Kostya Berger Cc: Freebsd-current X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49rGRb657Zz43wC X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=iW94qkvg; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of 6yearold@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4864:20::22f as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=6yearold@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.57 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.998]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a00:1450:4000::/36:c]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-current@freebsd.org]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.02)[-1.020]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.55)[-0.549]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2a00:1450:4864:20::22f:from]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[yahoo.co.uk]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2a00:1450::/32, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com:dkim] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.33 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 17:21:48 -0000 On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 9:04 PM Kostya Berger wrote: > r362292In editors/libreoffice 6.4.4 PDF export is broken, including also > PDF print to file. Tried with locally built 6.4.4 and pre-built package > 6.4.4.2 from official repo (separate installation for testing purposes). > Symptoms: of all content only graphics/tables elements get exported to > PDF. No text. PS printing is all right.As regards PDF printing to file in > general, it still works fine in Firefox. Only LO is affected. I filed a bug > report as well. > > With kindest regards, > Kostya Berger > Hum, can't reproduce this on my side. Can you do `pkg upgrade`, maybe some dependency is out of date? From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Mon Jun 22 17:27:09 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A566334FAB for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 17:27:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from shuriku@shurik.kiev.ua) Received: from mail.flex-it.com.ua (mail.flex-it.com.ua [193.239.74.7]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49rGYl5gjBz44VM for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 17:27:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from shuriku@shurik.kiev.ua) Received: from [46.98.231.114] (helo=thinkpad.flex-it.com.ua) by mail.flex-it.com.ua with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.94 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1jnQDj-0000YK-DS for freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 20:26:59 +0300 Subject: Re: editors/libreoffice PDF export/printing broken To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org References: <1240905853.3700064.1592845431061.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <1240905853.3700064.1592845431061@mail.yahoo.com> From: Oleksandr Kryvulia Message-ID: <813cc0ec-ed62-b633-adef-9d67a42f48ec@shurik.kiev.ua> Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 20:26:54 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: ru X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49rGYl5gjBz44VM X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of shuriku@shurik.kiev.ua designates 193.239.74.7 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=shuriku@shurik.kiev.ua X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.53 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[shurik.kiev.ua]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.70)[-0.696]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.88)[-0.883]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.35)[0.351]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:35297, ipnet:193.239.72.0/22, country:UA]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[46.98.231.114:received] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 17:27:09 -0000 22.06.20 20:21, Gleb Popov пишет: > On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 9:04 PM Kostya Berger wrote: > >> r362292In editors/libreoffice 6.4.4 PDF export is broken, including also >> PDF print to file. Tried with locally built 6.4.4 and pre-built package >> 6.4.4.2 from official repo (separate installation for testing purposes). >> Symptoms: of all content only graphics/tables elements get exported to >> PDF. No text. PS printing is all right.As regards PDF printing to file in >> general, it still works fine in Firefox. Only LO is affected. I filed a bug >> report as well. > Hum, can't reproduce this on my side. Can you do `pkg upgrade`, maybe some > dependency is out of date? I can confirm this problem on r362465 with latest editors/libreoffice from packages. From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Mon Jun 22 17:41:52 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 474E9335277 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 17:41:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from damjan.jov@gmail.com) Received: from mail-il1-x131.google.com (mail-il1-x131.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::131]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49rGtl1wrdz45Gy for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 17:41:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from damjan.jov@gmail.com) Received: by mail-il1-x131.google.com with SMTP id e11so16721466ilr.4 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 10:41:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=sX6tXHZ9T5vLo+z+u/+i02841vfKGxOWP7WTFpC/mQ4=; b=sKloKdu6FfleJvdDJjUo91JWnQmPLT+JWBzSt/izf4sTalQKDiKSN+YxYJ5qaS4z0i lTvhvK2xSIFm7cUf/d3Y55rHPaZEAqkSsGBR0XsmpXyJjbT/V+viD+Ugqn7D/8WdJGgL e6Izd6t/cm5MyqjDfOpnBh+cmnFW/POGL/bBYdai5qbATlEOF0rbbx7CEy3opRkY0mbS Kmpvo/1EIs8AWXmvlSCMZAe5eMTZzARFT7RhSpyPMFwvRjfRB+mbCBU2V37mhRSzkMYE OUmnMrfDZe4Rzx3/GQnASuwQGI9RGSeVEUVAIuPa5RxPPYcGxdrBEW6DL7j6SrEzTx2r x8jA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=sX6tXHZ9T5vLo+z+u/+i02841vfKGxOWP7WTFpC/mQ4=; b=kvouOofvBgdrRZ+PvCReIUA+PJ903K7Y2seulHTd2ANvDCwATQqhDUUEvjHoEd0ENb 1/Oqotd2Au4/sbSEjOXw13Xmzj8/ENUZ01I7v6YjcWqOXVRTHeCjGrqzt61a1bqOFS3v 78JeSYwx/6MrgaAUzxtMY7WQXwj4w7aaojTdaQ/gW++KYEnl0Vm2ru5BhqGlXg85cJdH zkPfg26hwSKT2sMQqyXmtrp7cj2FfKgBu1hRIVmZ58zWo4XRP623lOib/kOuDFqhILuF tPCHMavmVJjhtLI/PfzgFFifULcJ2cSaSYGGYVerH0M2jrmpsird73zDpdGNHcfJUvc6 eqCg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531Q9hDlHy0uOMpROtTKB142IlcEh7tQfhEhcxaK0R5IP/fOzy4d bhHrMNIaZjsUdxhU9DTXnyzB1Tz1FLMP4ZNEqdaE1GQx X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyJ0eP9aNZk87nWVAbe+niJs0sMzmkjcB8pv9wDy7t11mrw3MVBGwvvxxBghSX+Z3kYgq8s4rAJoTAmZC8xhY8= X-Received: by 2002:a92:d151:: with SMTP id t17mr19468340ilg.197.1592847710193; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 10:41:50 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1240905853.3700064.1592845431061.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <1240905853.3700064.1592845431061@mail.yahoo.com> <813cc0ec-ed62-b633-adef-9d67a42f48ec@shurik.kiev.ua> In-Reply-To: <813cc0ec-ed62-b633-adef-9d67a42f48ec@shurik.kiev.ua> From: Damjan Jovanovic Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 19:40:14 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: editors/libreoffice PDF export/printing broken To: Oleksandr Kryvulia Cc: freebsd-current X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49rGtl1wrdz45Gy X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=sKloKdu6; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of damjanjov@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::131 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=damjanjov@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.61 / 15.00]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.004]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-current@freebsd.org]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.003]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::131:from]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.60)[-0.599]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com:dkim] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.33 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 17:41:52 -0000 On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 7:27 PM Oleksandr Kryvulia wrote: > 22.06.20 20:21, Gleb Popov =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=88=D0=B5=D1=82: > > On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 9:04 PM Kostya Berger > wrote: > > > >> r362292In editors/libreoffice 6.4.4 PDF export is broken, including al= so > >> PDF print to file. Tried with locally built 6.4.4 and pre-built packag= e > >> 6.4.4.2 from official repo (separate installation for testing purposes= ). > >> Symptoms: of all content only graphics/tables elements get exported to > >> PDF. No text. PS printing is all right.As regards PDF printing to file > in > >> general, it still works fine in Firefox. Only LO is affected. I filed = a > bug > >> report as well. > > Hum, can't reproduce this on my side. Can you do `pkg upgrade`, maybe > some > > dependency is out of date? > > I can confirm this problem on r362465 with latest editors/libreoffice > from packages. > > FYI it works in openoffice. From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Mon Jun 22 18:26:28 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5B6E336D9B for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 18:26:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bergerkos@yahoo.co.uk) Received: from sonic309-25.consmr.mail.ir2.yahoo.com (sonic309-25.consmr.mail.ir2.yahoo.com [77.238.179.83]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49rHt844Rxz48X3 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 18:26:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bergerkos@yahoo.co.uk) X-YMail-OSG: RBo.B0kVM1lqF5ZLYIzFfBpAE9ngLxs5dEVtrq2PsVQTKQEBhZ07DWXUDWPExwH gJrgmT6XPrS1Z90Zjf2hQjquscoFaNrMvUquFR4IQzkTkei03VyKxMdXSoMhH3GNkojQtmGi9Ln_ Wnefel4AwqsjHZ7tqM3VLiAOog824zkGkaZkMeGdSgN07xH0ddW5p6UkS2H48ldN8lVTxzgMruLD TjHInHKmmhOrWuOeVbv0ymJ0I_e53p_ZJaHP_Rlsb7rV8_BEqCheJPVK96wScms5Yb5QO_MqL5Db 6LeM3MnBnBocIV_pUFoKHG_XSZ0R1MeIgZjFQ_novLZnlVUGHbpI69baWZRMC3cDXwWQcPvWl7ze TKVXSthxOu36F4RZCRPx3HMl3XyReZjOwMcMct66G261F08g.lt1dcf2p1bcWT6h1w2IKDIwUwRR EOHxfqGFFmKv4R21TSWN5ZPGcBFtGReoLfxP0n2q349ASz8HdE8QNTgrTT.AOB4aBYcs0OxbhY7R yUUPfCShb7ahcd_qh03xVYw3ZTYigTI2YD4SOzjE4lKSS4.tNVtOBlCTs6Y4IMUdNICBOgQXp9GF AVBwkf4leFFMW66YsvBWzK_WIb3rQIIy7s.VyCgLqoH_VZUNefowr0fh54TgeeOmm7BzsibaNAu9 m5M5LA5DaJjX4XjEahwFbQCCCq44LiIPZlso9cmRsBgrxqyYuYDU2P69N0aqqf5jXnBcPvJt9Pnn BeSuQ.IQez87dKLgJVSt_r14YNvvTTR_FdXxo.jJvnrjV8S1Ydp3N3VxtmZePAZTnT1SZVdmLrBa t1zcy50nIa58AEXiN3M6tJKfNgThfQO_pNgsWIRQrUZU_Im211L.0X1z.M3RDsgtUN_nsOhme9dz Ie6obIrrs.NiwXiR2nhm6pTknK6ym3igen1EAiXg5K.YuhaX79TfwlSIt0nhwFGrCcLMDNFKU6dp VDu47EFl2R8YcEfJ4ddF8b5zKDaIOHQuqYmNbxCPVIkhUAac6QXSpVqvnpxpG3Lp9a5OTC71dvNA 402Yki.xe5qrpH1BPWLylqaHcJV4FzgL2l5pyNjxMYaS8vGp9aVMIkjc4JiICBNPsyNRhvRAkMee 9Kfn1n9PP66T5ispDsdtNI8polbv8dHpJ2cqUp5SOQkRpLzrzqtV.eZCw_LPDoWWIsWV.r0UNhpe P3x_77aU8E0a9rjJaCLO6R2LJrntltaJ10XizB25jmYQILqDd9Pcbthdl2p.czGTgNd1Eg1DizIx DjEIIGzOdC0xrPqtKF7n2nhyDVjhx2eazPiwq5GS21ifGkZvznFl8xBcPpIm1jb4fo0oN6Tz0awd oJTw_eKbUnL2bFsysgbUECKta00VXwSrlrjIlupKzuR9xzVKb_fb3dOIpGyE_ZoTXdQS4VlL2huF 6Vaj4aEyj3g-- Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic309.consmr.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with HTTP; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 18:26:22 +0000 Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 18:26:19 +0000 (UTC) From: Kostya Berger Reply-To: "bergerkos@yahoo.co.uk" To: "6yearold@gmail.com" <6yearold@gmail.com> Cc: Freebsd-current Message-ID: <2008475768.3775242.1592850379401@mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: References: <1240905853.3700064.1592845431061.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <1240905853.3700064.1592845431061@mail.yahoo.com> Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=92_=D0=BE=D1=82=D0=B2=D0=B5=D1=82_=D0=BD=D0=B0:_Re:?= =?UTF-8?Q?_editors/libreof?= =?UTF-8?Q?fice_PDF_export/printing_broken?= MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: WebService/1.1.16138 YahooMailAndroidMobile YMobile/1.0 (com.yahoo.mobile.client.android.mail/6.8.2; Android/9; PKQ1.180904.001; whyred; Xiaomi; Redmi Note 5; 5.7; 2030x1080; ) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49rHt844Rxz48X3 X-Spamd-Bar: -- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.65 / 15.00]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[bergerkos@yahoo.co.uk]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[yahoo.co.uk]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ptr:yahoo.com]; REPLYTO_ADDR_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; URI_COUNT_ODD(1.00)[1]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[yahoo.co.uk:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[yahoo.co.uk,reject]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.63)[-0.634]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[gmail.com]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[yahoo.co.uk]; ASN(0.00)[asn:34010, ipnet:77.238.176.0/22, country:GB]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.002]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[yahoo.co.uk:s=s2048]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.02)[-1.018]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; FREEMAIL_REPLYTO(0.00)[yahoo.co.uk]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[77.238.179.83:from]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[77.238.179.83:from]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.33 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 18:26:29 -0000 No need to pkg upgrade. They are all freshly installed from official repo. = Clean install, new fresh user. The same in my second install, Synth built local repo. Same thing. And I'm talking about the PDF button in LO interface. Or File> Export to PD= F. =D0=9E=D1=82=D0=BF=D1=80=D0=B0=D0=B2=D0=BB=D0=B5=D0=BD=D0=BE =D0=B8=D0=B7 Y= ahoo =D0=9F=D0=BE=D1=87=D1=82=D1=8B =D0=B4=D0=BB=D1=8F Android=20 =20 =D0=BF=D0=BD, 22 =D0=B8=D1=8E=D0=BD. 2020 =D0=B2 20:22 Gleb Popov<6yearol= d@gmail.com> =D0=BD=D0=B0=D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=81=D0=B0=D0=BB(-=D0=B0): On Mon,= Jun 22, 2020 at 9:04 PM Kostya Berger wrote: > r362292In editors/libreoffice 6.4.4 PDF export is broken, including also > PDF print to file. Tried with locally built 6.4.4 and pre-built package > 6.4.4.2 from official repo (separate installation for testing purposes). > Symptoms: of all content only graphics/tables elements get exported to > PDF. No text. PS printing is all right.As regards PDF printing to file in > general, it still works fine in Firefox. Only LO is affected. I filed a b= ug > report as well. > > With kindest regards, > Kostya Berger > Hum, can't reproduce this on my side. Can you do `pkg upgrade`, maybe some dependency is out of date? _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" =20 From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Mon Jun 22 19:26:22 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7406338AE2 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 19:26:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49rKCL3mx8z4FxF for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 19:26:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 8175D338E4C; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 19:26:22 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8117B338ADF; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 19:26:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net) Received: from gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (br1.CN84in.dnsmgr.net [69.59.192.140]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49rKCK628rz4FbH; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 19:26:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net) Received: from gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id 05MJQJug011868; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 12:26:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net) Received: (from freebsd-rwg@localhost) by gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id 05MJQJwC011867; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 12:26:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg) From: "Rodney W. Grimes" Message-Id: <202006221926.05MJQJwC011867@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> Subject: Re: routed && route6d removal proposal In-Reply-To: <960ce7d8-f964-a686-dd79-242145b3ae5c@grosbein.net> To: Eugene Grosbein Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 12:26:19 -0700 (PDT) CC: "Rodney W. Grimes" , "Alexander V. Chernikov" , "current@FreeBSD.org" , net , freebsd-hackers X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL121h (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49rKCK628rz4FbH X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of freebsd-rwg@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net has no SPF policy when checking 69.59.192.140) smtp.mailfrom=freebsd-rwg@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.73 / 15.00]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_SOME(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.13)[-0.134]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.16)[0.162]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.20)[-0.197]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[dnsmgr.net]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[6]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:13868, ipnet:69.59.192.0/19, country:US]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 19:26:22 -0000 > 22.06.2020 19:49, Rodney W. Grimes wrote: > > > Whats unmaintained about code that has no need to change cause it just pretty much works? > > Have you actually tried running routed(8) as base for real network with loops, > mix of p2p and ethernet-like interfaces, IPv4 aliases, need of offset-lists and > with diameter about 6 hops? As I said I know of people that are running and it is working, and Hiroko's post clearly establishes that as fact in evidence. I am not even sure that RIP* has loop detection in the protocol, as the prefered routing protocol for anything multipath (which is what loops are in effect) is OSPF. > > I'm not talking about RIPv2 inherent deficiencies. > Our routed just glitches where quagga's ripd just works. And your PR# for reporting the bug is? -- Rod Grimes rgrimes@freebsd.org From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Mon Jun 22 19:28:07 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4157E339687 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 19:28:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net) Received: from gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (br1.CN84in.dnsmgr.net [69.59.192.140]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49rKFL6d12z4GP3; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 19:28:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net) Received: from gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id 05MJS5JK011888; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 12:28:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net) Received: (from freebsd-rwg@localhost) by gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id 05MJS5WY011887; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 12:28:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg) From: "Rodney W. Grimes" Message-Id: <202006221928.05MJS5WY011887@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> Subject: Re: ? ????? ??: vnc can't connect to socket In-Reply-To: <3E06883E-BAB1-4E1A-AB20-06DD1F812057@freebsd.org> To: Michael Tuexen Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 12:28:05 -0700 (PDT) CC: "Rodney W. Grimes" , Ian Lepore , "bergerkos@yahoo.co.uk" , "freebsd-current@freebsd.org" X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL121h (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49rKFL6d12z4GP3 X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:13868, ipnet:69.59.192.0/19, country:US] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 19:28:07 -0000 > > On 21. Jun 2020, at 23:12, Rodney W. Grimes wrote: > > > >>> On Sun, 2020-06-21 at 14:54 +0200, Michael Tuexen wrote: > >>>>> On 21. Jun 2020, at 14:28, Kostya Berger > >>>>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> Ok, it turns out, it gives the previously mentioned error only if I > >>>>> use VNC server string 0.0.0.0:5900 (as I always did). in my VNC > >>>>> client.But when replaced with127.0.0.1:5900it connects all right. > >>>> > >>>> I don't hink 0.0.0.0 is a valid destination address you can use in > >>>> connect(). Using 127.0.0.1 should > >>>> be fine. > >> > >> I do not believe that this is a destination address when your talking > >> about 0.0.0.0:5900 on the VNC server side, that is a wild card accept > >> any address and if this has been broken.. it must be fixed! > >> > >>>> I guess, https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/361752 is the > >>>> relevant commit here. > >>>> > >>> > >>> *BSD has always accepted 0 as a synonym for localhost (and iirc, linux > >>> does not). If this no longer works, it's a regression which is going > >>> to cause existing applications and scripts to fail. At the very least > >>> it deserves an entry in UPDATING. > >> > >> I am not aware of that, but can not deny it either, and just confirmed > >> it to be true: > >> root {1002}# telnet 0.0.0.0 22 > >> Trying 0.0.0.0... > >> Connected to 0.0.0.0. > >> Escape character is '^]'. > >> SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_7.8 FreeBSD-20180909 > > > > And to add the netstat data to show what connected: > > tcp4 0 0 127.0.0.1.22 127.0.0.1.43135 ESTABLISHED > > tcp4 38 0 127.0.0.1.43135 127.0.0.1.22 ESTABLISHED > > > > Can we back this commit out, discuss it in next weeks call, > > and then find a way forward? > > > >> > >> INADDR_ANY is the wildcard listen address, but as a destination what code remapped > >> it to 127.0.0.1? > >> > >> We should very seriously consider restoring this behavior. > Reallowing 0.0.0.0 is covered by https://reviews.freebsd.org/D25401 Thank you Michael. > Best regards > Michael > >> > >>> -- Ian > >>> > >>>> Best regards > >>>> Michael > >>>>> ?????????? ?? Yahoo ????? ??? Android > >>>>> > >>>>> ??, 21 ???. 2020 ? 9:40 Kostya Berger > >>>>> ???????(-?): Hi,upgraded to 362292 via buildworld.Now I cannot > >>>>> connect to my bhyve guest as I used to: neither via VNC nor via > >>>>> RDP.VNC gets error: unable to connect the socket. Address family > >>>>> not supported by protocol family (47). > >>>>> Neither can I ping my bhyve IP (it uses a separate NIC and should > >>>>> have no problems) > >>>>> Internet connectivity is ok and I can ping other hosts on my > >>>>> network. > >>>>> In 359997 all works fine. > >>>>> ?????????? ?? Yahoo ????? ??? Android > >>>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>>> freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > >>>>> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > >>>>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > >>>>> freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >>>> > >>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>> freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > >>>> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > >>>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > >>>> freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >>>> > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > >>> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >>> > >>> > >> > >> -- > >> Rod Grimes rgrimes@freebsd.org > >> _______________________________________________ > >> freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > >> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >> > > > > -- > > Rod Grimes rgrimes@freebsd.org > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- Rod Grimes rgrimes@freebsd.org From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Mon Jun 22 23:24:39 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 515B933FBFF for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 23:24:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steffen@sdaoden.eu) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49rQVH0BYQz4ZCK for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 23:24:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steffen@sdaoden.eu) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 04C4033FC15; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 23:24:39 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 048D533FBFE for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 23:24:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steffen@sdaoden.eu) Received: from sdaoden.eu (sdaoden.eu [217.144.132.164]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49rQVF6yY6z4YyY for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 23:24:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steffen@sdaoden.eu) Received: by sdaoden.eu (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B2BEE16059; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 01:14:52 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 01:14:52 +0200 From: Steffen Nurpmeso To: current@freebsd.org Subject: FYI: forum web site is .. unreadable Message-ID: <20200622231452.oAI4n%steffen@sdaoden.eu> Mail-Followup-To: current@freebsd.org User-Agent: s-nail v14.9.19-60-g74aff022 OpenPGP: id=EE19E1C1F2F7054F8D3954D8308964B51883A0DD; url=https://ftp.sdaoden.eu/steffen.asc; preference=signencrypt BlahBlahBlah: Any stupid boy can crush a beetle. But all the professors in the world can make no bugs. X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49rQVF6yY6z4YyY X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of steffen@sdaoden.eu designates 217.144.132.164 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=steffen@sdaoden.eu X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.47 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.57)[-0.570]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+a]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[sdaoden.eu]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.11)[0.109]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.23)[0.230]; MID_CONTAINS_FROM(1.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_ZERO(0.00)[0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15987, ipnet:217.144.128.0/20, country:DE] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 23:24:39 -0000 Hello. Normally i do not do forums (web interface etc etc), but i was interested in ZFS encryption support and so i searched, and found a page[1]. Now when i open that on a glibc Linux box with #?0|kent:src$ prt-get info firefox-bin Name: firefox-bin Path: /usr/ports/opt Version: 77.0.1 Release: 1 Description: Firefox binary URL: http://www.mozilla.com Maintainer: Fredrik Rinnestam, fredrik at crux dot guru Dependencies: gtk3,dbus-glib i.e. Mozilla.com-compiled firefox, then i see a small forum "frame" on the right side, it is right of the "Foundation" link in the link bar. It is just large enought to place "To be honest," in a single line, on a, well, pretty wide screen. [1] https://forums.freebsd.org/threads/native-encryption-of-zfs.70284/ Ciao, and good night from Germany, --steffen | |Der Kragenbaer, The moon bear, |der holt sich munter he cheerfully and one by one |einen nach dem anderen runter wa.ks himself off |(By Robert Gernhardt) From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Tue Jun 23 00:18:08 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC436340EF6 for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 00:18:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rebecca@bsdio.com) Received: from out03.mta.xmission.com (out03.mta.xmission.com [166.70.13.233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49rRgz4Wrxz4ckt for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 00:18:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rebecca@bsdio.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=simple/simple; d=bsdio.com; s=xmission; h=Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To: MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:References:Cc:To:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID :Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To: Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe :List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=U+KXiJW278ECVFeAfMzYwKIeVKRc5h5GajLMNGj2iF0=; b=RGchLYI08aH9edEI2QEX4/E0Zt /eOwJeCBjOSjF00RJnznhD5dhtFwSjzrrvNccA6MbU7EBKIBSDzedspcul04OHocMcxNv77dWi+sm x45Lu4Bul5z38+rEvIvTYo5+yAHxb79NvWYwvcm7o/GkoKtgIBu+KNMhA44Al7lM5+7c=; Received: from in02.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.52]) by out03.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jnWdR-0004Tc-6j; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 18:17:57 -0600 Received: from mta4.zcs.xmission.com ([166.70.13.68]) by in02.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1jnWdQ-0007U4-Ee; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 18:17:57 -0600 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mta4.zcs.xmission.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 178C4500CEC; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 18:17:56 -0600 (MDT) X-Amavis-Modified: Mail body modified (using disclaimer) - mta4.zcs.xmission.com Received: from mta4.zcs.xmission.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mta4.zcs.xmission.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id IXqc8gU54f_b; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 18:17:56 -0600 (MDT) Received: from [10.0.10.120] (c-174-52-16-57.hsd1.ut.comcast.net [174.52.16.57]) by mta4.zcs.xmission.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C59AD500CC7; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 18:17:55 -0600 (MDT) To: Warner Losh , Yasuhiro KIMURA Cc: FreeBSD Current References: <20200622.164523.492970231904065687.yasu@utahime.org> <20200622.191348.2299220192956341788.yasu@utahime.org> <20200623.003808.2170454908846294820.yasu@utahime.org> From: Rebecca Cran Message-ID: <8dabad6f-2f99-e563-f756-04655116881b@bsdio.com> Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 18:17:54 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US X-XM-SPF: eid=1jnWdQ-0007U4-Ee; ; ; mid=<8dabad6f-2f99-e563-f756-04655116881b@bsdio.com>; ; ; hst=in02.mta.xmission.com; ; ; ip=166.70.13.68; ; ; frm=rebecca@bsdio.com; ; ; spf=pass X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 166.70.13.68 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: rebecca@bsdio.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on sa07.xmission.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.5 required=8.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_60, DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE,T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG,TooManyTo_001,XMSubLong autolearn=disabled version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Report: * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * 1.5 BAYES_60 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 60 to 80% * [score: 0.6057] * 0.3 TooManyTo_001 Multiple "To" Header Recipients 2x (uncommon) * 0.7 XMSubLong Long Subject * 0.0 T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG BODY: No description available. * -0.0 DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE Not listed in DCC * [sa07 0; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1] X-Spam-DCC: ; sa07 0; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Combo: *;Warner Losh , Yasuhiro KIMURA X-Spam-Relay-Country: X-Spam-Timing: total 528 ms - load_scoreonly_sql: 0.11 (0.0%), signal_user_changed: 11 (2.0%), b_tie_ro: 9 (1.7%), parse: 1.03 (0.2%), extract_message_metadata: 4.3 (0.8%), get_uri_detail_list: 0.61 (0.1%), tests_pri_-1000: 2.6 (0.5%), tests_pri_-950: 1.35 (0.3%), tests_pri_-900: 1.08 (0.2%), tests_pri_-90: 51 (9.7%), check_bayes: 49 (9.3%), b_tokenize: 4.8 (0.9%), b_tok_get_all: 4.7 (0.9%), b_comp_prob: 2.8 (0.5%), b_tok_touch_all: 33 (6.3%), b_finish: 1.07 (0.2%), tests_pri_0: 444 (84.0%), check_dkim_signature: 0.60 (0.1%), check_dkim_adsp: 294 (55.7%), poll_dns_idle: 287 (54.3%), tests_pri_10: 2.0 (0.4%), tests_pri_500: 7 (1.4%), rewrite_mail: 0.00 (0.0%) Subject: Re: `shutdown -p now` fails to power off with VirtualBox UEFI boot X-Spam-Flag: No X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Thu, 05 May 2016 13:38:54 -0600) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in02.mta.xmission.com) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49rRgz4Wrxz4ckt X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=bsdio.com header.s=xmission header.b=RGchLYI0; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of rebecca@bsdio.com designates 166.70.13.233 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=rebecca@bsdio.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.03 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[6]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[bsdio.com:s=xmission]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:166.70.13.0/24]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.01)[-1.008]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[bsdio.com]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.99)[-0.994]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[174.52.16.57:received]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[bsdio.com:+]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.43)[-0.429]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:6315, ipnet:166.70.0.0/16, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[166.70.13.233:from] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 00:18:08 -0000 On 6/22/2020 10:12 AM, Warner Losh wrote: > I believe so. However, I've not dived deeply enough into this problem to > understand if it is a bug in our code or theirs.freebsd.org" As I've said before, at least under bhyve it's a bug in the UEFI firmware that we currently use. -- Rebecca Cran From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Tue Jun 23 00:19:09 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5A87341214 for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 00:19:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wlosh@bsdimp.com) Received: from mail-qk1-x72a.google.com (mail-qk1-x72a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::72a]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49rRj90h01z4cnw for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 00:19:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wlosh@bsdimp.com) Received: by mail-qk1-x72a.google.com with SMTP id w1so17324207qkw.5 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 17:19:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bsdimp-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=neGIDoZITxmQmXF4RLTWcOAyYEEqEbgPq11VOvJ7H2Y=; b=b3GIlj+Nrl2mbZeXvnPKZiYlgz4XVkCpEl1QEgrPIfXYkQp9pvnVOF6AtooXQ3bjbS cSbCAMeBB2987lnUZs6XATGfzab/HwBbSpma65f1Oq29k8YzBIOhjkeD0C8ay+susSbY OcHQjzt47jFFCXSLxVvRNCCoQAXlN7KtX5jRJCouoCRvIsOG+7Dk9F+hYkpDuZUCi9q8 N3hTXBQKF+x2HLgxBsA+75rz1vEG0yZqqPYQS06IwVwcY5mFPfAB8h9z02beM+Os/EhN e2u8dL+dV9Womk6RGglEbrokHAouQaIFmrwqm8KUTNb35pUNmhYhzxgLD+KRLCi6TD75 0SFg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=neGIDoZITxmQmXF4RLTWcOAyYEEqEbgPq11VOvJ7H2Y=; b=Xon7UT1nbdlMVGdfxKJERAYuvdeoChOy+1OWAEB5GPW4FZye9372lCoo56WpEU7G1Q y+TxKOSfi9S1eMJzzV2vl6kBUKs8p6qucR1o4IBvkXSIB9qRJTvLZeRaSWr5ffZb10Mv qIFFOctesjeUJMm67eCfpU/CU1WBic+P+3tqliC+22SefK6cFmgw+z2tsTrAWMXKpIb+ dpTczyIz8Y0/BmzKn60X7S1/g2J4n3yKRXifniOr8m0YsC9+d1Pct/28j4BLFyAZ8+0B V74AUodQl7H36zNrG+Zekzm+StMnZNX2/YysDGsC3abGLfgnyVPRZ8TRbYbWs5u/zf0J mqZw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533NTgRfHdAi03gFrizILeaz8nhIyy1qLCn/7JlvQsdu5Y1Y0xuQ QeJxdXpCnC80GvXTcDqNYPJtg70l8ASQxvaw9X4dUcXgXtM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJznPN5h2DG4uRHSQYLHKFmZCnZXjwsgpMDjxkJHsXKUZHmgf9a66fBSRg/HbDGsxA+aysQ/DiDgnVrNxMoVIkw= X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:2050:: with SMTP id d16mr19198145qka.215.1592871548057; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 17:19:08 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200622.164523.492970231904065687.yasu@utahime.org> <20200622.191348.2299220192956341788.yasu@utahime.org> <20200623.003808.2170454908846294820.yasu@utahime.org> <8dabad6f-2f99-e563-f756-04655116881b@bsdio.com> In-Reply-To: <8dabad6f-2f99-e563-f756-04655116881b@bsdio.com> From: Warner Losh Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 18:18:57 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: `shutdown -p now` fails to power off with VirtualBox UEFI boot To: Rebecca Cran Cc: Yasuhiro KIMURA , FreeBSD Current X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49rRj90h01z4cnw X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=bsdimp-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=b3GIlj+N; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of wlosh@bsdimp.com has no SPF policy when checking 2607:f8b0:4864:20::72a) smtp.mailfrom=wlosh@bsdimp.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.91 / 15.00]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[bsdimp-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com:s=20150623]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.93)[-0.926]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.01)[0.008]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-0.997]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-current@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[bsdimp.com]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[bsdimp-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com:+]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::72a:from]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[imp@bsdimp.com,wlosh@bsdimp.com]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[imp@bsdimp.com,wlosh@bsdimp.com] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.33 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 00:19:09 -0000 X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 00:19:09 -0000 On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 6:18 PM Rebecca Cran wrote: > On 6/22/2020 10:12 AM, Warner Losh wrote: > > I believe so. However, I've not dived deeply enough into this problem to > > understand if it is a bug in our code or theirs.freebsd.org" > > > As I've said before, at least under bhyve it's a bug in the UEFI > firmware that we currently use. > Is that fixed in the -devel version? I think I missed you saying this in the past... From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Tue Jun 23 00:20:23 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 813553412E9 for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 00:20:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rebecca@bsdio.com) Received: from out02.mta.xmission.com (out02.mta.xmission.com [166.70.13.232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49rRkZ0jksz4cvd for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 00:20:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rebecca@bsdio.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=simple/simple; d=bsdio.com; s=xmission; h=Subject:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID: From:References:Cc:To:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=lBsCttn+Jmfu+qiEIPhuzPguRoQyeK7w/we5v0zYl50=; b=FW48dLYdedVNdgEjA7VZ6XIAmP XySN6zcAM6p2gepj/FtCZfAburBYVJ8jFHZ55h68O9bytfTKfKLqca1W0nSTZeBR+8CF/eKrO1P37 o6mbpOKX8eMPwY4lnk3ZApzEGYN6TwSTrHSdWQ7V4LHLM9mK0gqPSPMSe74zzTgeGCJU=; Received: from in01.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.51]) by out02.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jnWfj-0005nv-Pl; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 18:20:19 -0600 Received: from mta3.zcs.xmission.com ([166.70.13.67]) by in01.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1jnWfj-0001Km-8C; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 18:20:19 -0600 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mta3.zcs.xmission.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 269BD16288F; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 18:20:19 -0600 (MDT) X-Amavis-Modified: Mail body modified (using disclaimer) - mta3.zcs.xmission.com Received: from mta3.zcs.xmission.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mta3.zcs.xmission.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id BbFa20XomiEU; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 18:20:19 -0600 (MDT) Received: from [10.0.10.120] (muon.bluestop.org [65.103.231.193]) (Authenticated sender: rebecca@bsdio.com) by mta3.zcs.xmission.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9DFB0160F92; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 18:20:18 -0600 (MDT) To: Warner Losh Cc: Yasuhiro KIMURA , FreeBSD Current References: <20200622.164523.492970231904065687.yasu@utahime.org> <20200622.191348.2299220192956341788.yasu@utahime.org> <20200623.003808.2170454908846294820.yasu@utahime.org> <8dabad6f-2f99-e563-f756-04655116881b@bsdio.com> From: Rebecca Cran Message-ID: <01661126-83ca-4c4a-b8ae-80b8dd5270df@bsdio.com> Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 18:20:16 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US X-XM-SPF: eid=1jnWfj-0001Km-8C; ; ; mid=<01661126-83ca-4c4a-b8ae-80b8dd5270df@bsdio.com>; ; ; hst=in01.mta.xmission.com; ; ; ip=166.70.13.67; ; ; frm=rebecca@bsdio.com; ; ; spf=pass X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 166.70.13.67 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: rebecca@bsdio.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on sa06.xmission.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.5 required=8.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_50, DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE,HTML_MESSAGE,T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG,XMSubLong, XM_B_Unicode autolearn=disabled version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Report: * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% * [score: 0.5759] * 0.7 XMSubLong Long Subject * 0.0 XM_B_Unicode BODY: Testing for specific types of unicode * 0.0 T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG BODY: No description available. * 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message * -0.0 DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE Not listed in DCC * [sa06 0; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1] X-Spam-DCC: ; sa06 0; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Combo: ;Warner Losh X-Spam-Relay-Country: X-Spam-Timing: total 305 ms - load_scoreonly_sql: 0.04 (0.0%), signal_user_changed: 13 (4.4%), b_tie_ro: 12 (3.9%), parse: 1.41 (0.5%), extract_message_metadata: 19 (6.1%), get_uri_detail_list: 1.92 (0.6%), tests_pri_-1000: 13 (4.4%), tests_pri_-950: 1.29 (0.4%), tests_pri_-900: 0.97 (0.3%), tests_pri_-90: 58 (18.9%), check_bayes: 56 (18.3%), b_tokenize: 6 (2.1%), b_tok_get_all: 5 (1.7%), b_comp_prob: 2.0 (0.7%), b_tok_touch_all: 39 (12.8%), b_finish: 0.99 (0.3%), tests_pri_0: 187 (61.4%), check_dkim_signature: 0.62 (0.2%), check_dkim_adsp: 2.3 (0.7%), poll_dns_idle: 0.59 (0.2%), tests_pri_10: 2.2 (0.7%), tests_pri_500: 6 (2.0%), rewrite_mail: 0.00 (0.0%) Subject: Re: `shutdown -p now` fails to power off with VirtualBox UEFI boot X-Spam-Flag: No X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Thu, 05 May 2016 13:38:54 -0600) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in01.mta.xmission.com) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49rRkZ0jksz4cvd X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=bsdio.com header.s=xmission header.b=FW48dLYd; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of rebecca@bsdio.com designates 166.70.13.232 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=rebecca@bsdio.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.34 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[bsdio.com:s=xmission]; RCVD_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[6]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:166.70.13.0/24:c]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.01)[-1.007]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[bsdio.com]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.01)[-1.006]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_GOOD(0.00)[166.70.13.232:from]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[bsdio.com:+]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.73)[-0.728]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:6315, ipnet:166.70.0.0/16, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[166.70.13.232:from] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.33 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 00:20:23 -0000 On 6/22/2020 6:18 PM, Warner Losh wrote: > > > On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 6:18 PM Rebecca Cran > wrote: > > On 6/22/2020 10:12 AM, Warner Losh wrote: > > I believe so. However, I've not dived deeply enough into this > problem to > > understand if it is a bug in our code or theirs.freebsd.org > " > > > As I've said before, at least under bhyve it's a bug in the UEFI > firmware that we currently use. > > > Is that fixed in the -devel version?  I think I missed you saying this > in the past... No, but I hope to update that port in the next week or so to include the fix. -- Rebecca Cran From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Tue Jun 23 05:33:42 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4028349D00 for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 05:33:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49rZh651Cwz42cw for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 05:33:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id ABC73349944; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 05:33:42 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB659349877; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 05:33:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net) Received: from gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (br1.CN84in.dnsmgr.net [69.59.192.140]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49rZh55b1Bz42Gw; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 05:33:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net) Received: from gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id 05N5XdP6013965; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 22:33:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net) Received: (from freebsd-rwg@localhost) by gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id 05N5XdsD013964; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 22:33:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg) From: "Rodney W. Grimes" Message-Id: <202006230533.05N5XdsD013964@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> Subject: Re: routed && route6d removal proposal In-Reply-To: <33c892bf-5d71-cd65-3041-449cc1bf6e6b@grosbein.net> To: Eugene Grosbein Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 22:33:39 -0700 (PDT) CC: "Rodney W. Grimes" , "current@FreeBSD.org" , net , freebsd-hackers X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL121h (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49rZh55b1Bz42Gw X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of freebsd-rwg@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net has no SPF policy when checking 69.59.192.140) smtp.mailfrom=freebsd-rwg@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.76 / 15.00]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_SOME(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.37)[-0.369]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.38)[0.382]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.15)[-0.150]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[dnsmgr.net]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:13868, ipnet:69.59.192.0/19, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 05:33:43 -0000 > 23.06.2020 2:26, Rodney W. Grimes wrote: > > >> 22.06.2020 19:49, Rodney W. Grimes wrote: > >>> Whats unmaintained about code that has no need to change cause it just pretty much works? > >> Have you actually tried running routed(8) as base for real network with loops, > >> mix of p2p and ethernet-like interfaces, IPv4 aliases, need of offset-lists and > >> with diameter about 6 hops? > > > > As I said I know of people that are running and it is working, and > > Hiroko's post clearly establishes that as fact in evidence. > > > > I am not even sure that RIP* has loop detection in the protocol, > > It has, of course. Slight miss communications, there really isnt a loop detection in the on wire protocol, or multipath support, it simply excludes certain routes that end up excluded by counting to infinity to stop the loop (inifinity is usually 16 for this solution). Its not like OSPF or BGP where you can calculate loops and mulipath effects. Bottom line, RipV2 is not healthy on a network when loops exist, though it should not lead to failure. > > > as the prefered routing protocol for anything multipath (which > > is what loops are in effect) is OSPF. > > RIPv2 may be used for failover, not for multipath. Any redundant route creates L3 "multipath". Yes. > >> I'm not talking about RIPv2 inherent deficiencies. > >> Our routed just glitches where quagga's ripd just works. > > > > And your PR# for reporting the bug is? > > Was. https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51927 > Never had a chance to verify if it was really fixed in HEAD because it was not for RELENG_4, > so I moved to ripd. As you may remeber, RELENG_5 needed much time to become ready for production. I can not find any commit linked to that bug, but this is probalby before the system to do that existed. Unless we can confirm the bug still exists I think it would be predunt to assume it is fixed based on what I read in the PR, so dismissing the claim that the inbase routed "just glitches." Can you agree with that logic Eugene? Regards, -- Rod Grimes rgrimes@freebsd.org From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Tue Jun 23 06:48:20 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC65034B17D for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 06:48:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gljennjohn@gmail.com) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49rcLD53K1z45gb for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 06:48:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gljennjohn@gmail.com) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id AB95934B17C; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 06:48:20 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB57034B17B for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 06:48:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gljennjohn@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wr1-x436.google.com (mail-wr1-x436.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::436]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49rcLC4ryhz45mS for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 06:48:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gljennjohn@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wr1-x436.google.com with SMTP id a6so17295282wrm.4 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 23:48:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:reply-to :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=7Dla0Wd/yyq41PGHxJ419lWodKEQjojsFSWfGrIlTcc=; b=QeZZGMEbIWUMT7bYWDi2jgqFZ9I0iw77Hp9LG5cQ9FMs/W9lIFzrztabrTsaettvl+ 42zTTg63PYgFCxQfgXsL75XbPfZX4a2vzR7wJfz7xDansgw4Fq/FwMFo7TBH4H+O7PGs R3mm/deRC2oL6gziQrUK/dv31GcEqi0ItBXJg1ABFx4toGqVVlxVZv01zsD2NSscFpZg eHm3Z5dLXnF2ajJuramF5+EHmO8hSsQVZ+z1821EoNLLVNHfslB2ynZmSzFx+m46k8dm m+WwRlxbwqJaj0vIHUSmGq4V0D7YO2QiAJcHRYI7ajm5NPsKqoBE69AYrg1upqMjGiBr fdXQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:reply-to:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=7Dla0Wd/yyq41PGHxJ419lWodKEQjojsFSWfGrIlTcc=; b=K5USM16HVGxXxOPWxBOd0uROBQZSijom6DLPPYTnFx9CsAc5qP02fc++h0/F+QBvIj Dbwgo6EUBUhI7NpmoTwvxg6zy4eFA5fuLiUUAO7QNQkbDyLWjd+scF7tVmgr/O+6asUh 3b3YEs4k9EW+Nyy97CI6zNp91Vr6DFFZFEQG1MFsjfSS/gw6vXO7ZmF8Ge7ap7A+OfW2 2WPEP36UfeNO5+sFy/D3OgPxlQYdtIGqLH6lXU9tdLxYbeApOFgbUaXi40j/HDYHcIFj VhjojG4+Mt6T7qs6hAs7fXr81cQnKqsTyZQksi1G68+/cC3IuW0t1B3h5uiomRmpLzhO iZfA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533qrvc+tGkGhUO4ej7ASpcFDgyrr6KK8slrVPGO/iL5eQlXk3GN 39XpRDa6KUcj1BBswjyjvSeUj0jS X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxKozlx8gDqM5jZ/9xD0vB/CcSUJXZJCKnCL15s/Eo0k93M9wYcEHX7ymJmXnCMDIn1lZ1eww== X-Received: by 2002:adf:8521:: with SMTP id 30mr22207275wrh.238.1592894898072; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 23:48:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ernst.home (p5b3be131.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [91.59.225.49]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m65sm2356318wmf.17.2020.06.22.23.48.17 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 22 Jun 2020 23:48:17 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 08:48:16 +0200 From: Gary Jennejohn To: Steffen Nurpmeso Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FYI: forum web site is .. unreadable Message-ID: <20200623084816.71af4250@ernst.home> In-Reply-To: <20200622231452.oAI4n%steffen@sdaoden.eu> References: <20200622231452.oAI4n%steffen@sdaoden.eu> Reply-To: gljennjohn@gmail.com X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.5 (GTK+ 2.24.32; amd64-portbld-freebsd13.0) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49rcLC4ryhz45mS X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=QeZZGMEb; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of gljennjohn@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4864:20::436 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=gljennjohn@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.54 / 15.00]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[gljennjohn@gmail.com]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a00:1450:4000::/36:c]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; REPLYTO_ADDR_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.45)[-0.447]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[91.59.225.49:received]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2a00:1450::/32, country:US]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com:dkim]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.07)[-1.065]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.03)[-1.029]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; FREEMAIL_REPLYTO(0.00)[gmail.com]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[current@freebsd.org]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2a00:1450:4864:20::436:from]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 06:48:21 -0000 On Tue, 23 Jun 2020 01:14:52 +0200 Steffen Nurpmeso wrote: > Hello. > > Normally i do not do forums (web interface etc etc), but i was > interested in ZFS encryption support and so i searched, and found > a page[1]. Now when i open that on a glibc Linux box with > > #?0|kent:src$ prt-get info firefox-bin > Name: firefox-bin > Path: /usr/ports/opt > Version: 77.0.1 > Release: 1 > Description: Firefox binary > URL: http://www.mozilla.com > Maintainer: Fredrik Rinnestam, fredrik at crux dot guru > Dependencies: gtk3,dbus-glib > > i.e. Mozilla.com-compiled firefox, then i see a small forum > "frame" on the right side, it is right of the "Foundation" link in > the link bar. It is just large enought to place "To be honest," > in a single line, on a, well, pretty wide screen. > > [1] https://forums.freebsd.org/threads/native-encryption-of-zfs.70284/ > > Ciao, and good night from Germany, > I see exactly the same bad formatting with the standard firefox port. All the text is pushed to the right. seamonkey works, but it's been removed from ports. -- Gary Jennejohn From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Tue Jun 23 07:31:38 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD0AA34BE4A for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 07:31:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zeising+freebsd@daemonic.se) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49rdJB3z54z483X for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 07:31:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zeising+freebsd@daemonic.se) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 8851E34C0E0; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 07:31:38 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8818834BE48 for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 07:31:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zeising+freebsd@daemonic.se) Received: from mail.daemonic.se (mail.daemonic.se [IPv6:2607:f740:d:20::25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49rdJ94ygRz483W for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 07:31:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zeising+freebsd@daemonic.se) Received: from cid.daemonic.se (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mail.daemonic.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49rdJ25grtz3mQC; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 07:31:30 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=daemonic.se; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-language:content-type :content-type:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:date :message-id:from:from:references:subject:subject:received :received; s=20151023; t=1592897490; bh=/5p080FE4wb59JGIslMOcjEc 1Z1niGvNm5tUFltj6mM=; b=oaPbOiChTiF2bgG5sNAiDO2f//8ejoEFy0mOcU1H pAPMbwQ69VLcIUYMrBg806FbwvGdP96I77H4nPh1/keszfPQO4mYi6gWwoDj8QPd +rmy2Oxy5FrIaqxPJwXYU3JzWBl2xw6SyHdp1qHJA/DV98L1b/p4qtGZrrqo66fv q1I= X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at daemonic.se Received: from mail.daemonic.se ([IPv6:::1]) (using TLS with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256) by cid.daemonic.se (mailscanner.daemonic.se [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10587) with ESMTPS id p-euvgAUruAl; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 07:31:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from garnet.daemonic.se (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:dca9:201:b056:3745:7a29:96fa]) by mail.daemonic.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 49rdJ2190nz3mMv; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 07:31:30 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: FYI: forum web site is .. unreadable To: gljennjohn@gmail.com, Steffen Nurpmeso Cc: current@freebsd.org References: <20200622231452.oAI4n%steffen@sdaoden.eu> <20200623084816.71af4250@ernst.home> From: Niclas Zeising Message-ID: Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 09:31:21 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200623084816.71af4250@ernst.home> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49rdJ94ygRz483W X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=daemonic.se header.s=20151023 header.b=oaPbOiCh; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=daemonic.se; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of zeising@daemonic.se designates 2607:f740:d:20::25 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=zeising@daemonic.se X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.03 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[daemonic.se:s=20151023]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.01)[-1.011]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.04)[-1.038]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[daemonic.se:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[daemonic.se,none]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.98)[-0.983]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[gmail.com,sdaoden.eu]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:36236, ipnet:2607:f740:d::/48, country:US]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[freebsd]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 07:31:38 -0000 On 2020-06-23 08:48, Gary Jennejohn wrote: > On Tue, 23 Jun 2020 01:14:52 +0200 > Steffen Nurpmeso wrote: > >> Hello. >> >> Normally i do not do forums (web interface etc etc), but i was >> interested in ZFS encryption support and so i searched, and found >> a page[1]. Now when i open that on a glibc Linux box with >> >> #?0|kent:src$ prt-get info firefox-bin >> Name: firefox-bin >> Path: /usr/ports/opt >> Version: 77.0.1 >> Release: 1 >> Description: Firefox binary >> URL: http://www.mozilla.com >> Maintainer: Fredrik Rinnestam, fredrik at crux dot guru >> Dependencies: gtk3,dbus-glib >> >> i.e. Mozilla.com-compiled firefox, then i see a small forum >> "frame" on the right side, it is right of the "Foundation" link in >> the link bar. It is just large enought to place "To be honest," >> in a single line, on a, well, pretty wide screen. >> >> [1] https://forums.freebsd.org/threads/native-encryption-of-zfs.70284/ >> >> Ciao, and good night from Germany, >> > > I see exactly the same bad formatting with the standard firefox port. All the > text is pushed to the right. > > seamonkey works, but it's been removed from ports. > It looks fine on my 1080p display, using Firefox from FreeBSD packages. Regards -- Niclas From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Tue Jun 23 09:05:16 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FFAB34EA3E for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 09:05:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bergerkos@yahoo.co.uk) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49rgNC6TBPz4F8b for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 09:05:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bergerkos@yahoo.co.uk) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id DC53A34E833; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 09:05:15 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAFD634E832 for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 09:05:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bergerkos@yahoo.co.uk) Received: from sonic301-21.consmr.mail.ir2.yahoo.com (sonic301-21.consmr.mail.ir2.yahoo.com [77.238.176.98]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49rgN85ktRz4FFC for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 09:05:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bergerkos@yahoo.co.uk) X-YMail-OSG: OGhDbisVM1kMdGADuZsIzu.0tU3URN2dSQzbxP4zMMURTVT7jLWlik1yKB1_V1o bcGHpATW_p3dbSIx94KICj2SYK3B4vvnLcP5in3aFT9j_yjTjmX.Jiqx938D39chKP8K.HULU01F H01.iDM4DfG8_SWbcBvdfQz6rbZ_YMEAUXY07U9eSnsc.E2EpnNPqZPhd0tteO0QKjraeE7ay.uZ SQSILTnFSfcxnTB_N2wDm6ZkGQJj38K1AaDfEshDiuKJAd_tRuTw4JubIZLN7dXEXeuKF.e48MeH FjT6YRa3UlpwUXHKwi9awD2DAwkSwoNGlGBMcRcdsg0ViXHKyAwzwYU12AnWi9ymrKbxTUR7AYEr PCLzCI2NDoAdNx_AqOHINrkVCAI..e7PMPeKQprvNdOVIUyJWV5wCaDeq7NRO1pJRFdTQ2lg8vqQ lMOE7GnIXDFrYss6FtqBMiP2vQgLFxG3aG4ejDAupk7RyBg2ayLM9CdqirseBl.cx24.9Cv.1DnG 41fxKzRnndStwqT5XPlagB8rOC6NSv4nJw2oRjLw.4SCf7qRCv.4SuJX5STKOkg2YmiPGLz6PNIp bRFeD.4uJUde5U6Ek.14a8w2OdgrpiApuBPbj_6UenFvoxszZDHOf1qbEY6Nnv1.7ypJ56DVADlF vLdHZHWppiupk9wVfrcbqXugLt.D3ixHICpEaP1TRbK0nq2xCrmC7G_q8ZJ0RMUykO7ZAHacodhx a.tyMaSp_VJa.WDfVsPknPM8DrBx7.ow1rdyQpyf8GGe28LNPFVYjBtkPcg_zyy7oPBipCJGEWs9 ZtCEfqu_nq5WUA1TGUhlMIXcvJUuP5WYvWWdGAJV5Q8CrnGm7cerwV51VjVeV8vfgaPDPuZizaL3 HQjCX795XtCLyJMQhKPik35XEjhpCn5M0hkpH_oCq4WbxkO5Qfl4KeUsCHRqLBWW4NyIVgYykS96 T61axW.J.5pk4cyxgpi0g8dkG73XPsrXRzoZRFJvD0xqUES2mOGSgA9PqKqBos.vkBEn5GJKfnOU 4uX9l1WhxwORHrp1Wdsaqo3M8HyDcqWwc_fG6470g.xg.Vg.nl8B6ghHWsFkCVykg5_3jWehB7YE md8bMnjzCrQcgQD5aUjNn3_B5sokoyRLMn859xIEY_.GGbTQXZTNbVu2I9UO9G3EabDC6c9K868d LuArnfN91kUZ2UWO_kMreFL1QQR1FB7ptGoQvfuAmCA3zYOWEy9z.DMkmJmVmFTQLEeQUzxTcVJh 35pImtLqBqWua1UKiAtlbLNV.qah239RIDG1np7xq2.R6.qRdvKOMVVEQY6gRlollgdwkp3nl.xZ xg.YZVhIgrdf7sAGxqnvTfoKSqRgmG2oe8U2FvaM9Sms9mAm7rNvznMo3kEE9knPT0rzEoG9ub_G uD2Bc382IF_ws Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic301.consmr.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with HTTP; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 09:05:10 +0000 Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 09:05:06 +0000 (UTC) From: Kostya Berger Reply-To: "bergerkos@yahoo.co.uk" To: "zeising+freebsd@daemonic.se" , "gljennjohn@gmail.com" , Steffen Nurpmeso Cc: "current@freebsd.org" Message-ID: <1673290029.4164246.1592903106580@mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20200622231452.oAI4n%steffen@sdaoden.eu> <20200623084816.71af4250@ernst.home> Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=92_=D0=BE=D1=82=D0=B2=D0=B5=D1=82_=D0=BD=D0=B0:_R?= =?UTF-8?Q?e:_FYI:_forum?= =?UTF-8?Q?_web_site_is_.._unreadable?= MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: WebService/1.1.16138 YahooMailAndroidMobile YMobile/1.0 (com.yahoo.mobile.client.android.mail/6.8.2; Android/9; PKQ1.180904.001; whyred; Xiaomi; Redmi Note 5; 5.7; 2030x1080; ) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49rgN85ktRz4FFC X-Spamd-Bar: / X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.46 / 15.00]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[bergerkos@yahoo.co.uk]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[yahoo.co.uk]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ptr:yahoo.com]; REPLYTO_ADDR_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; URI_COUNT_ODD(1.00)[1]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[yahoo.co.uk:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[yahoo.co.uk,reject]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.02)[-0.025]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[daemonic.se,gmail.com,sdaoden.eu]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[yahoo.co.uk]; ASN(0.00)[asn:34010, ipnet:77.238.176.0/22, country:GB]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.93)[-0.927]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[yahoo.co.uk:s=s2048]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.01)[-1.009]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[freebsd]; FREEMAIL_REPLYTO(0.00)[yahoo.co.uk]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[77.238.176.98:from]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[77.238.176.98:from]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS(1.50)[] X-Spam: Yes Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.33 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 09:05:16 -0000 Looks fine in my Firefox. No such problems. Locally built Firefox. =D0=9E=D1=82=D0=BF=D1=80=D0=B0=D0=B2=D0=BB=D0=B5=D0=BD=D0=BE =D0=B8=D0=B7 Y= ahoo =D0=9F=D0=BE=D1=87=D1=82=D1=8B =D0=B4=D0=BB=D1=8F Android=20 =20 =D0=B2=D1=82, 23 =D0=B8=D1=8E=D0=BD. 2020 =D0=B2 10:32 Niclas Zeising =D0=BD=D0=B0=D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=81=D0=B0=D0=BB(-=D0= =B0): On 2020-06-23 08:48, Gary Jennejohn wrote: > On Tue, 23 Jun 2020 01:14:52 +0200 > Steffen Nurpmeso wrote: >=20 >> Hello. >> >> Normally i do not do forums (web interface etc etc), but i was >> interested in ZFS encryption support and so i searched, and found >> a page[1].=C2=A0 Now when i open that on a glibc Linux box with >> >>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 #?0|kent:src$ prt-get info firefox-bin >>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 Name:=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 firefox-bin >>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 Path:=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 /usr/ports/opt >>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 Version:=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 77.0.1 >>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 Release:=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 1 >>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 Description:=C2=A0 Firefox binary >>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 URL:=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 http://www.mozilla.c= om >>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 Maintainer:=C2=A0 Fredrik Rinnestam, fredrik at crux dot gu= ru >>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 Dependencies: gtk3,dbus-glib >> >> i.e. Mozilla.com-compiled firefox, then i see a small forum >> "frame" on the right side, it is right of the "Foundation" link in >> the link bar.=C2=A0 It is just large enought to place "To be honest," >> in a single line, on a, well, pretty wide screen. >> >>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 [1] https://forums.freebsd.org/threads/native-encryption-of= -zfs.70284/ >> >> Ciao, and good night from Germany, >> >=20 > I see exactly the same bad formatting with the standard firefox port.=C2= =A0 All the > text is pushed to the right. >=20 > seamonkey works, but it's been removed from ports. >=20 It looks fine on my 1080p display, using Firefox from FreeBSD packages. Regards --=20 Niclas _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" =20 From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Tue Jun 23 11:07:38 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2EEF351C0F for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 11:07:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gljennjohn@gmail.com) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49rk5Q5JNZz4MhJ for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 11:07:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gljennjohn@gmail.com) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id B4181351C0E; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 11:07:38 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3CD6351B64 for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 11:07:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gljennjohn@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wm1-x32c.google.com (mail-wm1-x32c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32c]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49rk5Q0Dwsz4N23 for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 11:07:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gljennjohn@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wm1-x32c.google.com with SMTP id j18so2584513wmi.3 for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 04:07:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:reply-to :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=YNYGKC1VGeab0pwsKOQQI/sethNHjYne6yrg/wGgqlY=; b=vToNuSl2Z02/nHiqMVwfdhStGVbDfBA4q7LbjVmO9pjRp2ZdTqIK7ZY9wL30wW280M JX112vemaaBOhaVGHt1eVhLw+Eu7uHCHipX7dqyEfITHqyJd7OSDJa2yjhP827CgeL3O 9vRvcWgka/UWFg1cihiHYKyUkFk6vUMoNaufHii24Iu9tK+NKRH5s9pk55yah4RavYlp rEzmEqxRMV/tWOJt+a3oyKrgaOo0AuB5TJiNqjv2CLyTP/iHIEZ97xbx72EKOr6MtZ06 IlAUkDqyLsOh8kHPvqR1NBV5v0qhWVC5QMr3D113gWQ7XHR6vHGTE3deFkACJOt8ljTu sJoQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:reply-to:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=YNYGKC1VGeab0pwsKOQQI/sethNHjYne6yrg/wGgqlY=; b=tPSF52TtqB/PKL6DWLjIfa9euujTpbA5ENOabt1m7lr4txttYpVINcw+KxVLBY96Kv 14QfwbZrZZirMoT4/4NIIn/69ecgMsC43PSQ2YHlURie/V23kM5qnjyL/LsOuTEW45u0 uwmDTZ4jtG2kjiWLyz5fU2D+RIpG3CBdAJXGfxT7iclFdLhBfmFYWg9BUj7RIiNxXDEr MDgYogBBcBPkx8b4czdqzdrm+nFyrcu9//fip1oumwK+Em1a+D1cA9l5l9eZ0KuCHVks TKnlFbXwCBNACxh25qwWnqVFLr0P7Pe1VUihq2NE9AA6qImib3ATdTxCmPUed6zWuUZ2 Hw8Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530nPbdFfCXb9ryjNmsTEChCQyTqZeQCm3LIybIBCePE8dpjIFUJ 8TPv4gUqfWBmBotNJBxJL2cenApj X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzQAEXqlRrR1PWGTpD2NvKTNUHvhcSV1bpWX64SJxPQT70fYUJe4XE5V27YcfZOaIGbWY6xMg== X-Received: by 2002:a7b:cd10:: with SMTP id f16mr24151428wmj.86.1592910454974; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 04:07:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ernst.home (p5b3be131.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [91.59.225.49]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a81sm3571101wmd.25.2020.06.23.04.07.33 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 23 Jun 2020 04:07:34 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 13:07:33 +0200 From: Gary Jennejohn To: Kostya Berger Cc: "zeising+freebsd@daemonic.se" , Steffen Nurpmeso , "current@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=3F_=3F=3F=3F=3F=3F_=3F=3F:?= Re: FYI: forum web site is .. unreadable Message-ID: <20200623130733.658b4a40@ernst.home> In-Reply-To: <1673290029.4164246.1592903106580@mail.yahoo.com> References: <20200622231452.oAI4n%steffen@sdaoden.eu> <20200623084816.71af4250@ernst.home> <1673290029.4164246.1592903106580@mail.yahoo.com> Reply-To: gljennjohn@gmail.com X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.5 (GTK+ 2.24.32; amd64-portbld-freebsd13.0) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49rk5Q0Dwsz4N23 X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=vToNuSl2; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of gljennjohn@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4864:20::32c as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=gljennjohn@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.04 / 15.00]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[gljennjohn@gmail.com]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a00:1450:4000::/36]; REPLYTO_ADDR_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; SUBJ_EXCESS_QP(1.20)[]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[yahoo.co.uk]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2a00:1450::/32, country:US]; SUBJECT_HAS_QUESTION(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com:dkim]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.03)[-1.031]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[91.59.225.49:received]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.66)[-0.660]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.04)[-1.044]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[freebsd]; FREEMAIL_REPLYTO(0.00)[gmail.com]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[current@freebsd.org]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2a00:1450:4864:20::32c:from]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS(1.50)[] X-Spam: Yes X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 11:07:39 -0000 On Tue, 23 Jun 2020 09:05:06 +0000 (UTC) Kostya Berger wrote: > Looks fine in my Firefox. No such problems. Locally built Firefox. > > ____________________ ____ Yahoo __________ ______ Android > > ____, 23 ______. 2020 __ 10:32 Niclas Zeising ______________(-__): On 2020-06-23 08:48, Gary Jennejohn wrote: > > On Tue, 23 Jun 2020 01:14:52 +0200 > > Steffen Nurpmeso wrote: > > > >> Hello. > >> > >> Normally i do not do forums (web interface etc etc), but i was > >> interested in ZFS encryption support and so i searched, and found > >> a page[1].__ Now when i open that on a glibc Linux box with > >> > >>__ __ #?0|kent:src$ prt-get info firefox-bin > >>__ __ Name:__ __ __ __ firefox-bin > >>__ __ Path:__ __ __ __ /usr/ports/opt > >>__ __ Version:__ __ __ 77.0.1 > >>__ __ Release:__ __ __ 1 > >>__ __ Description:__ Firefox binary > >>__ __ URL:__ __ __ __ __ http://www.mozilla.com > >>__ __ Maintainer:__ Fredrik Rinnestam, fredrik at crux dot guru > >>__ __ Dependencies: gtk3,dbus-glib > >> > >> i.e. Mozilla.com-compiled firefox, then i see a small forum > >> "frame" on the right side, it is right of the "Foundation" link in > >> the link bar.__ It is just large enought to place "To be honest," > >> in a single line, on a, well, pretty wide screen. > >> > >>__ __ [1] https://forums.freebsd.org/threads/native-encryption-of-zfs.70284/ > >> > >> Ciao, and good night from Germany, > >> > > > > I see exactly the same bad formatting with the standard firefox port.__ All the > > text is pushed to the right. > > > > seamonkey works, but it's been removed from ports. > > > > It looks fine on my 1080p display, using Firefox from FreeBSD packages. > I just installed the latest firefox from the package repository and the forum page is still mis-formatted. This is the only website of the many I use which displays this error. My display is 2560x1440 (probably irrelevant). Not really all that important to me in any case. -- Gary Jennejohn From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Tue Jun 23 14:23:55 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23FE63566BA for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 14:23:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bergerkos@yahoo.co.uk) Received: from sonic313-20.consmr.mail.ir2.yahoo.com (sonic313-20.consmr.mail.ir2.yahoo.com [77.238.179.187]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49rpRs6l80z4b3s for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 14:23:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bergerkos@yahoo.co.uk) X-YMail-OSG: OgBQbp0VM1mOF8xFiPzBKzgQI8cD9L6raePgwMxuM9cdAWugo.hZJWcJHzchW.G Lfl4jP53I3OMeQJLWn9J.2y9f9Y9sY4PDmXoiW6NArgfvSQPW2WSg1Enn7SNHf8almq6IeZifnOu 1IEFCNz1Tft7ZWE5vvC4IqZPeCYqw8WkSw_fmvspj0sYsRHIJ.7OBg2MZ3XR1B.j67MeW0UfP3Xt wm3538fYJAsLqJKuThqgVXcJO7g0xe1K.81lo4_.zJ57OdvQYrMcCc7z7SihcRm3RYpmJe9fZRUd qL4YQxmz6LS1nB40MN06jt3CfGmBkHvBuVqDLc3ZSkTvCpaldoMPoXmQdzGv5rnHBoVejsS0yanR ykssiO4fyNHawGOwBrydZ5f9yjZHOCtHk85lUBdRelOppJCS1y5U5FLTBj_wWp4IjF7D2nZAyESd .H6LC7vz5TsSMiiutVPl.PJ1dAAMaThB_LJm23whfVQWkSpnqxwnvNkXclY38xcSWJZejJnSrxma VY3VpLCXkeiszX7FT9rh8mgBsvPq7U2ZNgaTyx2ebBPnOw_f3CbRbSdVap.4EXw775sZc81WILXi IDBXhINXafx0Tpa5G1UTcwtCyKF0JRsbn3YGl6HV8rgU79HseNa0erTCdxZ0xzcCRVZUculiBVYu k7AoctU7Psl7IFWhNVfl9IXYfdW0usRlwz2EGjG.uad8XxIw3pkvjs98yddEy8jOTVpPLbHgycy6 fa2wkO0OQeBCfl03.H.Bw0qZGS15jOJrGgOtrnKwtM9LGInrOWfLR0chaOZYNp2r0p_KHPciY31d 8bFmVx_3wIBpdTOUP4B6LhkqOVK8DxZLSzoVY54VUd8OrPpGSnuK8.2YaZfO3LG8n47dQaPDPTd. Vs3v89IUBq.9l1WXxVbFv22.sIen0HgZ3PMinj6SW3VdLtkwOpgzc_An7pKV4_Z3PUNjGBg0oI_e hVMO0r7uYOBuWXo5a1RLkzHDaDb.bn4r7NnKIR2vqBNiime3jrptEpMpdFZ6cIs3jkROapPBcfVs PRBdgrG.CrnrUKy.ixTbF9djb5vIjMTCiycw5Gav0HgCjO0EQd_pA_SQ28FcGdffFZdEhEPZf_7l _7QT6ftztGP5.oPi03phaCZ8EnbIQZ0aVySnU5Zzzs0e7FmGrKd3KbOUZUKRGSk73Qg7hOkgTWcf tK0o0eUiNr9FyksbsUZeGKzE2qVCxAGf48ZxlqRbJYnhtfm.xORn9zn5UE7OpwpmYBhwmjwAAL8y ZiskfPT7My3CKnRRCpkRG0tfHwaR1TzDhrXq5kbUiRraHP8uu12BNpX6F1ol4F9PFd2HsM829gpX ukmbVlIX6R9Rp6iWD8PL5ypv3hQ-- Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic313.consmr.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with HTTP; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 14:23:51 +0000 Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 14:23:48 +0000 (UTC) From: Kostya Berger To: Freebsd-current Message-ID: <1250230056.4543844.1592922228227@mail.yahoo.com> Subject: openzfs-kmod build error MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1250230056.4543844.1592922228227.ref@mail.yahoo.com> X-Mailer: WebService/1.1.16138 YMailNorrin Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:77.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/77.0 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49rpRs6l80z4b3s X-Spamd-Bar: --- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.61 / 15.00]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[yahoo.co.uk:s=s2048]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.94)[-0.943]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[yahoo.co.uk]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ptr:yahoo.com]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-0.999]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[yahoo.co.uk:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[yahoo.co.uk,reject]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[77.238.179.187:from]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.67)[-0.667]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[yahoo.co.uk]; ASN(0.00)[asn:34010, ipnet:77.238.176.0/22, country:GB]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[77.238.179.187:from] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.33 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 14:23:55 -0000 CURRENT r362292=20 sysutils/openzfs-kmod build aborts with error:............... /usr/ports/sysutils/openzfs-kmod/work/zfs-c0eb5c35e/module/os/freebsd/zfs/z= fs_vfsops.c:128:19: error:=20 =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 incompatible pointer types initializing 'vfs= _checkexp_t *' (aka 'int (*)(struct =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 mount *, struct sockaddr *, unsigned long *,= struct ucred **, int *, int *)') with =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 an expression of type 'int (vfs_t *, struct = sockaddr *, int *, struct ucred **, int =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 *, int **)' (aka 'int (struct mount *, struc= t sockaddr *, int *, struct ucred **, =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 int *, int **)') [-Werror,-Wincompatible-poi= nter-types] =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 .vfs_checkexp =3D=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2= =A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 zfs_checkexp, =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2= =A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0= =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 ^~~~~~~~~~~~ /usr/ports/sysutils/openzfs-kmod/work/zfs-c0eb5c35e/module/os/freebsd/zfs/z= fs_vfsops.c:1911:56: error:=20 =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 incompatible pointer types passing 'int *' t= o parameter of type 'uint64_t *' =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 (aka 'unsigned long *') [-Werror,-Wincompati= ble-pointer-types] =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 return (vfs_stdcheckexp(zfsvfs->= z_parent->z_vfs, nam, extflagsp, =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2= =A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0= =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2= =A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0= =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 ^~~~~~~~= ~ /usr/src/sys/sys/mount.h:980:17: note: passing argument to parameter here vfs_checkexp_t=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 vfs_st= dcheckexp; =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2= =A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 ^ /usr/ports/sysutils/openzfs-kmod/work/zfs-c0eb5c35e/module/os/freebsd/zfs/z= fs_vfsops.c:1912:32: error:=20 =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 incompatible pointer types passing 'int **' = to parameter of type 'int *'; =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 dereference with * [-Werror,-Wincompatible-p= ointer-types] =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 credanon= p, numsecflavors, secflavors)); =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2= =A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0= =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 ^~= ~~~~~~~~ =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2= =A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0= =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 * /usr/src/sys/sys/mount.h:980:17: note: passing argument to parameter here vfs_checkexp_t=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 vfs_st= dcheckexp; =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2= =A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 ^ 3 errors generated. *** Error code 1 Stop. With kindest regards, Kostya Berger =20 From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Tue Jun 23 14:54:43 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 479E6357264 for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 14:54:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steffen@sdaoden.eu) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49rq7Q73mhz4dXy for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 14:54:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steffen@sdaoden.eu) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id F048E357396; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 14:54:42 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEEA2357433 for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 14:54:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steffen@sdaoden.eu) Received: from sdaoden.eu (sdaoden.eu [217.144.132.164]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49rq7P4npmz4djs for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 14:54:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steffen@sdaoden.eu) Received: by sdaoden.eu (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 419C616059; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 16:46:39 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 16:46:39 +0200 From: Steffen Nurpmeso To: Gary Jennejohn Cc: Kostya Berger , "zeising+freebsd@daemonic.se" , "current@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: ? ????? ??: Re: FYI: forum web site is .. unreadable Message-ID: <20200623144639.8mJH9%steffen@sdaoden.eu> In-Reply-To: <20200623130733.658b4a40@ernst.home> References: <20200622231452.oAI4n%steffen@sdaoden.eu> <20200623084816.71af4250@ernst.home> <1673290029.4164246.1592903106580@mail.yahoo.com> <20200623130733.658b4a40@ernst.home> Mail-Followup-To: Gary Jennejohn , Kostya Berger , "zeising+freebsd@daemonic.se" , "current@freebsd.org" User-Agent: s-nail v14.9.19-60-g74aff022 OpenPGP: id=EE19E1C1F2F7054F8D3954D8308964B51883A0DD; url=https://ftp.sdaoden.eu/steffen.asc; preference=signencrypt BlahBlahBlah: Any stupid boy can crush a beetle. But all the professors in the world can make no bugs. X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49rq7P4npmz4djs X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of steffen@sdaoden.eu designates 217.144.132.164 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=steffen@sdaoden.eu X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.28 / 15.00]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_SOME(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.98)[-0.983]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+a]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[freebsd]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[sdaoden.eu]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.98)[-0.976]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.52)[-0.523]; MID_CONTAINS_FROM(1.00)[]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[gmail.com]; RCVD_COUNT_ZERO(0.00)[0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_CC(0.00)[yahoo.co.uk,daemonic.se,freebsd.org]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15987, ipnet:217.144.128.0/20, country:DE]; SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS(1.50)[]; SUBJECT_HAS_QUESTION(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 14:54:43 -0000 Gary Jennejohn wrote in <20200623130733.658b4a40@ernst.home>: |On Tue, 23 Jun 2020 09:05:06 +0000 (UTC) |Kostya Berger wrote: | |> Looks fine in my Firefox. No such problems. Locally built Firefox. ... |> ____, 23 ______. 2020 __ 10:32 Niclas Zeising se> ______________(-__): On 2020-06-23 08:48, Gary Jennejohn wrote: |>> On Tue, 23 Jun 2020 01:14:52 +0200 |>> Steffen Nurpmeso wrote: ... |>>> Normally i do not do forums (web interface etc etc), but i was |>>> interested in ZFS encryption support and so i searched, and found |>>> a page[1].__ Now when i open that on a glibc Linux box with |>>> |>>>__ __ #?0|kent:src$ prt-get info firefox-bin ... |>>>__ __ Version:__ __ __ 77.0.1 .. |>>> i.e. Mozilla.com-compiled firefox, then i see a small forum |>>> "frame" on the right side, it is right of the "Foundation" link in |>>> the link bar.__ It is just large enought to place "To be honest," |>>> in a single line, on a, well, pretty wide screen. |>>> |>>>__ __ [1] https://forums.freebsd.org/threads/native-encryption-of-zfs.70\ |>>>284/ |>>> |>>> Ciao, and good night from Germany, |>>> |>> |>> I see exactly the same bad formatting with the standard firefox \ |>> port.__ All the |>> text is pushed to the right. |>> |>> seamonkey works, but it's been removed from ports. |> |> It looks fine on my 1080p display, using Firefox from FreeBSD packages. | |I just installed the latest firefox from the package repository and \ |the forum page |is still mis-formatted. | |This is the only website of the many I use which displays this error. | |My display is 2560x1440 (probably irrelevant). Not really all that \ |important |to me in any case. I have registered myself at the forum, but it is still unusable even thereafter. I looked at the source but i miss two decades of CSS etc. development to truly understand what there is, and since even the stylesheets are generated via monstrous URLs from a PHP script (!!) i cannot tell at all what is going on, to give a hint. But FreeBSD is not a marginal side note, even if i do not have a FreeBSD system with X display right now. Accessing forums.freebsd.org via lynx "looks much better", but it says "JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.". Forums are not for me, it was just for your interest. --steffen | |Der Kragenbaer, The moon bear, |der holt sich munter he cheerfully and one by one |einen nach dem anderen runter wa.ks himself off |(By Robert Gernhardt) From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Tue Jun 23 15:04:19 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47FAF357A6C for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 15:04:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bergerkos@yahoo.co.uk) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49rqLV4ZF9z4fWL for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 15:04:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bergerkos@yahoo.co.uk) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 9CD4A3576D7; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 15:04:18 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C95A357766 for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 15:04:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bergerkos@yahoo.co.uk) Received: from sonic305-20.consmr.mail.ir2.yahoo.com (sonic305-20.consmr.mail.ir2.yahoo.com [77.238.177.82]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49rqLT3nqKz4fRm for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 15:04:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bergerkos@yahoo.co.uk) X-YMail-OSG: JLeh7JkVM1nWDUUVkXeVgFt3jZZu2kMqXXD9qU6Gy2YyQm1U.XnB._ar202e2Kd UV.qTf1n_Dqd7w0cPsZI4uCtFHyGeFnqXBSPvoRPEJABuomyDuEZs6xdL0GWq2alg0ItGSzQG2_L Nix4OjRY_Rnw58e7z7wWBzNeiPNOcppU9zCxdGDtmZe4AQEeJWCvDX1LX_u_H7PCj2LFLkAIRbTq rqM46UonaZwQW_AKIoBwS7HvXChZNvm4f_IOIe0_g7uNPYt8z4DKbHkkllo85UysDVSGkbRiU1ZI Tm1X0iSQ3qZ.F3QALMbTp6qylMxxnJ72xDc2loYY.MSyQUmA11TiAdFO1oEJVatr9wDxm6wXn_B1 19GdosSz8HTl4zgIwHdL5GaUquoCc1bfP_H6fodb5.hsbXhzlSDkOC_uBRm5CWuh7eF7DyFlV90p hGIRai54xkGkVPgoxVqi5fTUSr5tqRT.hCiw_4BNovQ6EJOQe05wyo_SyeYt_FQOCtn9TXuISk8v 5CzdFsUyGhk23sMtHcyBj.GjmCuX4GiaMxqabSFDbNSeE1sDuKmm9hM7dg97seRyUeyeJnwwdH_2 PRMxSbZjrAHUcXCV_u6ksKnvHIAZGM1OM3Yq51Ad2jcRiF3C1.BSySxUlaXmKq1yKc0cACOAhL3r 72DlM0Ic6A.T_jhSdnZihgd4_kmJRi14.US_ywSH_tof2mbgJIfp6pg8B6TQzpjNWhPpvI9WNrFq a7WEbukghKsAz7o2AZzi849Opw3E4JFz0GQ5Rb4yxmrJSEcNoCI4DVAslQgH.dBTTqJJU2wBEc3Y LWjVTC36mocMroHsA_GHj85xG68N6yduO5S.Xdr0YpLCCEDebNFj0Wk29ebZtEb5kknljvWswbjV 23NVa1MC6h5w86v3pzBHfYDv_URZ0QIlAigSGqZCYidsHysv2Eb4RIwPLxatj_oLTfiADib_b2WR MuLFRhLD.a7963bFdQLY.taGqQwNpUZN_SCfEQEmoh91ZinuDq8B03FZfXdi782ApMhARzBHaZtz Oxnd4Yvx2aNmK872CT65WLi47g6DkSBw9SeYzc0l8QagtE4dzPcd4ffMtkDgkBhtzNFLo4KqgVwm kSumSGy6QNnMPeyBY0GiW.bpuY6gbQ8rwr9oM6Zwcnunsj916j5UjLXIBGo2gQlK8A0ILwm7iKZy hSw1pqd.p33O7QsCX6S3MB.sa0xzWYktON2nBHrcwsym5yZ5PI8aIs8Qy1H3GzovCuyo.ob2f.X5 EiQ6qSpIHAezHkr2hj3D2WK83cis0DgRaefPmldZ4_Cz6urgNLCHf.MSG4h.g0rmwPakgOjiF9de 7KBNWy6r_a9izhPbPrNfr_FnrH5NG5FD.NRsHByaFnETwvz4cQV9npdGug0E2nM7de7J_7WTCLa5 CGOZSDmJDW9MZdpDEDUls4Xao4fD1PDrVPhKDLSaTpbIfsb9vUuHFU1f454R4bJzQ5g-- Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic305.consmr.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with HTTP; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 15:04:15 +0000 Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 15:04:11 +0000 (UTC) From: Kostya Berger Reply-To: "bergerkos@yahoo.co.uk" To: "steffen@sdaoden.eu" , Gary Jennejohn Cc: "zeising+freebsd@daemonic.se" , "current@freebsd.org" Message-ID: <811812565.4605472.1592924651983@mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20200623144639.8mJH9%steffen@sdaoden.eu> References: <20200622231452.oAI4n%steffen@sdaoden.eu> <20200623084816.71af4250@ernst.home> <1673290029.4164246.1592903106580@mail.yahoo.com> <20200623130733.658b4a40@ernst.home> <20200623144639.8mJH9%steffen@sdaoden.eu> Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=92_=D0=BE=D1=82=D0=B2=D0=B5=D1=82_=D0=BD=D0=B0:_Re:_=3F?= =?UTF-8?Q?_=3F=3F=3F=3F=3F_=3F=3F:_Re:_FY?= =?UTF-8?Q?I:_forum_web_site_is_.._unreadable?= MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: WebService/1.1.16138 YahooMailAndroidMobile YMobile/1.0 (com.yahoo.mobile.client.android.mail/6.8.2; Android/9; PKQ1.180904.001; whyred; Xiaomi; Redmi Note 5; 5.7; 2030x1080; ) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49rqLT3nqKz4fRm X-Spamd-Bar: / X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.44 / 15.00]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[bergerkos@yahoo.co.uk]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[yahoo.co.uk]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ptr:yahoo.com]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_GOOD(0.00)[77.238.177.82:from]; REPLYTO_ADDR_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; URI_COUNT_ODD(1.00)[1]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[yahoo.co.uk:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[yahoo.co.uk,reject]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[sdaoden.eu,gmail.com]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[yahoo.co.uk]; ASN(0.00)[asn:34010, ipnet:77.238.176.0/22, country:GB]; SUBJECT_HAS_QUESTION(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.94)[-0.937]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[yahoo.co.uk:s=s2048]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.01)[0.007]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.01)[-1.008]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[freebsd]; FREEMAIL_REPLYTO(0.00)[yahoo.co.uk]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[77.238.177.82:from]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS(1.50)[] X-Spam: Yes Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.33 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 15:04:19 -0000 Can it be due to some interference/filtering by your router or your ISP?=C2= =A0 I have never EVER seen such problem in Firefox on ANY system. Did you try from Windows from the same place? Anyway, you can try resetting your Firefox to defaults. =D0=9E=D1=82=D0=BF=D1=80=D0=B0=D0=B2=D0=BB=D0=B5=D0=BD=D0=BE =D0=B8=D0=B7 Y= ahoo =D0=9F=D0=BE=D1=87=D1=82=D1=8B =D0=B4=D0=BB=D1=8F Android=20 =20 =D0=B2=D1=82, 23 =D0=B8=D1=8E=D0=BD. 2020 =D0=B2 17:55 Steffen Nurpmeso =D0=BD=D0=B0=D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=81=D0=B0=D0=BB(-=D0=B0): G= ary Jennejohn wrote in <20200623130733.658b4a40@ernst.home>: |On Tue, 23 Jun 2020 09:05:06 +0000 (UTC) |Kostya Berger wrote: | |> Looks fine in my Firefox. No such problems. Locally built Firefox. ... |>=C2=A0 ____, 23 ______. 2020 __ 10:32 Niclas Zeising=C2=A0 se> ______________(-__):=C2=A0 On 2020-06-23 08:48, Gary Jennejoh= n wrote: |>> On Tue, 23 Jun 2020 01:14:52 +0200 |>> Steffen Nurpmeso wrote: ... |>>> Normally i do not do forums (web interface etc etc), but i was |>>> interested in ZFS encryption support and so i searched, and found |>>> a page[1].__ Now when i open that on a glibc Linux box with |>>> |>>>__ __ #?0|kent:src$ prt-get info firefox-bin ... |>>>__ __ Version:__ __ __ 77.0.1 .. |>>> i.e. Mozilla.com-compiled firefox, then i see a small forum |>>> "frame" on the right side, it is right of the "Foundation" link in |>>> the link bar.__ It is just large enought to place "To be honest," |>>> in a single line, on a, well, pretty wide screen. |>>> |>>>__ __ [1] https://forums.freebsd.org/threads/native-encryption-of-zfs.= 70\ |>>>284/ |>>> |>>> Ciao, and good night from Germany, |>>>=C2=A0=20 |>>=20 |>> I see exactly the same bad formatting with the standard firefox \ |>> port.__ All the |>> text is pushed to the right. |>>=20 |>> seamonkey works, but it's been removed from ports. |>=20 |> It looks fine on my 1080p display, using Firefox from FreeBSD packages. | |I just installed the latest firefox from the package repository and \ |the forum page |is still mis-formatted. | |This is the only website of the many I use which displays this error. | |My display is 2560x1440 (probably irrelevant).=C2=A0 Not really all that = \ |important |to me in any case. I have registered myself at the forum, but it is still unusable even thereafter.=C2=A0 I looked at the source but i miss two decades of CSS etc. development to truly understand what there is, and since even the stylesheets are generated via monstrous URLs from a PHP script (!!) i cannot tell at all what is going on, to give a hint. But FreeBSD is not a marginal side note, even if i do not have a FreeBSD system with X display right now. Accessing forums.freebsd.org via lynx "looks much better", but it says "JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.". Forums are not for me, it was just for your interest. --steffen | |Der Kragenbaer,=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 The= moon bear, |der holt sich munter=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 he cheerfully and o= ne by one |einen nach dem anderen runter=C2=A0 wa.ks himself off |(By Robert Gernhardt) _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" =20 From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Tue Jun 23 15:12:50 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88815330007 for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 15:12:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rmacklem@uoguelph.ca) Received: from CAN01-QB1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-eopbgr660066.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.66.66]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.protection.outlook.com", Issuer "GlobalSign Organization Validation CA - SHA256 - G3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49rqXK47hWz4g00; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 15:12:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rmacklem@uoguelph.ca) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=BcOwXBVl8e6GHwDPfHEN/8fgH+pjE90eJBwq6OJwXRN0yeLYSu995zaxHfrar+lzzihS1Ji7kBHqzfZpc76eOpwzVjIMHd+/TlBzyuoIoxM7/fqlSNWTskL8M7+K+NameRecaVH7jGlyH1pR1bSBGMFyrVYGwxHpDsl+pO8dOox1ZPydOOh33u5j4zaUCr0FaSRIJzyMVH1iTRN1IagUwMjD9SHN/fgMlfmAAuWcCsvh/0ri3+GoC6BUN7s2YMxYyW3/Rz+URis/mkQmbjOaShaHDZKIw1hRoXupR9yu0yAcYdPoUpBpHlXA59Onk2ASSAN6ru7XMlUSiExXNauZIw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=4IEKBX36kPC5GI4G8czanT9oz8M0PcgfKewWBjm+Vjg=; b=VGwp5HR66Jcirzj6mdu7BDEpYsKndZcKb4s4T8D7gaLLkWHHq1ArdkepOpnKeQTxhkh7uDBoo1vokC9ETqnP71p8EU+KNENsUM2Rp8xzWmfBvpykGY0TGABCDJNEXFGE6sib7NBHHecBipf2XkfxtQLa+RdVKXqil0WpDZ7kPesL/wC2okfcyl/j4NolDGKzVIBZ0zmGF95FUsKsO5pjZw7d3gr3A4U2ts8gxKFzj2mdET2Exi1vfTtRXIcKGlqdkeWC7JICzMvwYsBXPermgG0IA37riK5wLWG9NmWh5WtsFCbSz2C7hLnSjf/czMjyOSHcYzou7ABybzxP8RLycw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=uoguelph.ca; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=uoguelph.ca; dkim=pass header.d=uoguelph.ca; arc=none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=uoguelph.ca; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=4IEKBX36kPC5GI4G8czanT9oz8M0PcgfKewWBjm+Vjg=; b=KVZdt8TyKWkzffwfj1Fe6NhPfRFQjzsnfStBMCMn9lIHu/1PWslML69KOKQmUkWhaCLYmTJk3tiF/rkctMp1KFY7X5PbaZ7OMDs0fvMKVJE+4nB5DFkEQ/5zvlc9fVQHMnexUC/3NwWPTY/bi4T1OpOb6xQQeK655jHbc3iQHw9BIq7oqwJyf8cyvGFJKB3jY9Y6SxajYicmC6iWFgAj4K8JVLajLjoDV2ESJivmtDFISpSk6rGzosYf2zPmqK3WfmBpZUHhHTe1/nWVV49gy9a3jwNJTskMj6wPrACUU5OHrS++RZCcRnKnCyJ/PhYbdAZT9vMcLYTq4O3YbMtDrQ== Received: from QB1PR01MB3364.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (2603:10b6:c00:38::14) by QB1PR01MB3250.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (2603:10b6:c00:32::30) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3109.21; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 15:12:46 +0000 Received: from QB1PR01MB3364.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM ([fe80::60f3:4ca2:8a4a:1e91]) by QB1PR01MB3364.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM ([fe80::60f3:4ca2:8a4a:1e91%7]) with mapi id 15.20.3109.027; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 15:12:46 +0000 From: Rick Macklem To: Kostya Berger , Freebsd-current CC: Ryan Moeller Subject: Re: openzfs-kmod build error Thread-Topic: openzfs-kmod build error Thread-Index: AQHWSWnv3nyb/Fs3LEao8e4Dfk5JoKjmSsG0 Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 15:12:46 +0000 Message-ID: References: <1250230056.4543844.1592922228227.ref@mail.yahoo.com>, <1250230056.4543844.1592922228227@mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <1250230056.4543844.1592922228227@mail.yahoo.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-ms-publictraffictype: Email x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: c9e7277b-ec3b-4669-340d-08d81787e294 x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: QB1PR01MB3250: x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:8273; x-forefront-prvs: 04433051BF x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1 x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: vQMoFBQF4d1dx6pYYxMobo9cTUcXfvqdI0FBMlK9ahw7P9S5HVCcQg6G+Jc8DVLCfvC8awmU6RMew4R2taeNRWUHQyXWL7qdwyugwlJWK4FGRiOtGZzb6t5/MVXrXMVnXrP5C5Fl8H65iI27FyTLFRToR6OLnCQlFlCpVifc79PLwEYg/hS3mSa0L7DEpgr/ZUL7NnHHIfjRvvJkvmVSAlQju6D2OXPZjEjuiHanVb/UnH2Bj/Tt8intKd0Kd7ZPPVfftqeKWjjH8SETleQ9FSE1rP+wW/zC39U/kejIPdHaRlivEzeo45KVn/88YOn50BNbl00rt5rEEOiSX5IkopIZZ8N6isfNmIA6AQaJP7hwIa23T3svHQ0Zq9LTNln+iAoPI12sO9FICV5iyQ5DMw== x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:QB1PR01MB3364.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFTY:; SFS:(346002)(396003)(376002)(366004)(136003)(39860400002)(4326008)(52536014)(7696005)(3480700007)(86362001)(2906002)(110136005)(316002)(5660300002)(966005)(186003)(786003)(71200400001)(478600001)(6506007)(33656002)(66476007)(91956017)(66946007)(66446008)(76116006)(8936002)(55016002)(9686003)(8676002)(64756008)(66556008); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: 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 x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: uoguelph.ca X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: c9e7277b-ec3b-4669-340d-08d81787e294 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 23 Jun 2020 15:12:46.1023 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: be62a12b-2cad-49a1-a5fa-85f4f3156a7d X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: /A91By2Y10FF5AxgyNrFjvQ2QMhcsY2CuZpoBVXGHWe51zsGuWUSXkz/awrEGjesY8pv/Ku1adoKOisE3oOpvw== X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: QB1PR01MB3250 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49rqXK47hWz4g00 X-Spamd-Bar: ----- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=uoguelph.ca header.s=selector1 header.b=KVZdt8Ty; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of rmacklem@uoguelph.ca designates 40.107.66.66 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=rmacklem@uoguelph.ca X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-5.03 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.01)[-1.015]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[uoguelph.ca:s=selector1]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:40.107.0.0/16]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.98)[-0.981]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[uoguelph.ca]; DWL_DNSWL_LOW(-1.00)[uoguelph.ca:dkim]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[uoguelph.ca:+]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.54)[-0.538]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[40.107.66.66:from]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[yahoo.co.uk,freebsd.org]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:8075, ipnet:40.104.0.0/14, country:US]; ARC_ALLOW(-1.00)[microsoft.com:s=arcselector9901:i=1]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[40.107.66.66:from] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 15:12:50 -0000 Kostya Berger wrote:=0A= >CURRENT r362292=0A= >sysutils/openzfs-kmod build aborts with error:...............=0A= >/usr/ports/sysutils/openzfs-kmod/work/zfs->c0eb5c35e/module/os/freebsd/zfs= /zfs_vfsops.c:128:19: error:=0A= > incompatible pointer types initializing 'vfs_checkexp_t *' (aka 'int= (*)(struct=0A= > mount *, struct sockaddr *, unsigned long *, struct ucred **, int *,= int *)') with=0A= > an expression of type 'int (vfs_t *, struct sockaddr *, int *, struc= t ucred **, int=0A= > *, int **)' (aka 'int (struct mount *, struct sockaddr *, int *, str= uct ucred **,=0A= > int *, int **)') [-Werror,-Wincompatible-pointer-types]=0A= > .vfs_checkexp =3D zfs_checkexp,=0A= > ^~~~~~~~~~~~=0A= >/usr/ports/sysutils/openzfs-kmod/work/zfs->c0eb5c35e/module/os/freebsd/zfs= /zfs_vfsops.c:1911:56: error:=0A= > incompatible pointer types passing 'int *' to parameter of type 'uin= t64_t *'=0A= > (aka 'unsigned long *') [-Werror,-Wincompatible-pointer-types]=0A= > return (vfs_stdcheckexp(zfsvfs->z_parent->z_vfs, nam, extflagsp,= =0A= > ^~~~~~~~~=0A= >/usr/src/sys/sys/mount.h:980:17: note: passing argument to parameter here= =0A= >vfs_checkexp_t vfs_stdcheckexp;=0A= > ^=0A= >/usr/ports/sysutils/openzfs-kmod/work/zfs->c0eb5c35e/module/os/freebsd/zfs= /zfs_vfsops.c:1912:32: error:=0A= > incompatible pointer types passing 'int **' to parameter of type 'in= t *';=0A= > dereference with * [-Werror,-Wincompatible-pointer-types]=0A= > credanonp, numsecflavors, secflavors));=0A= > ^~~~~~~~~~=0A= > *=0A= >/usr/src/sys/sys/mount.h:980:17: note: passing argument to parameter here= =0A= >vfs_checkexp_t vfs_stdcheckexp;=0A= > ^=0A= >3 errors generated.=0A= >*** Error code 1=0A= >=0A= >Stop.=0A= Post r362158, the argument types change. Since they are just passed to=0A= vfs_stdcheckexp(), all that needs to be done is changing the types of=0A= the arguments.=0A= =0A= freqlabs@ volunteered to do this upstream, but I don't know if/when=0A= that gets applied to the port?=0A= =0A= If you can fix this, simply replace:=0A= zfs_checkexp(vfs_t *vfsp, struct sockaddr *nam, int *extflagsp,=0A= struct ucred **credanonp, int *numsecflavors, int **secflavors)=0A= =0A= with=0A= =0A= zfs_checkexp(vfs_t *vfsp, struct sockaddr *nam, uint64_t *extflagsp,=0A= struct ucred **credanonp, int *numsecflavors, int *secflavors)=0A= =0A= in the two places it exists in zfs_vfsops.c.=0A= =0A= rick=0A= =0A= =0A= =0A= With kindest regards,=0A= Kostya Berger=0A= =0A= _______________________________________________=0A= freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list=0A= https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current=0A= To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"= =0A= From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Tue Jun 23 15:44:43 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A630C330C80 for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 15:44:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steffen@sdaoden.eu) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49rrF72j9gz3Svg for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 15:44:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steffen@sdaoden.eu) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 5CC85330C05; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 15:44:43 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C9233308FF for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 15:44:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steffen@sdaoden.eu) Received: from sdaoden.eu (sdaoden.eu [217.144.132.164]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49rrF65Ygnz3T3K for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 15:44:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steffen@sdaoden.eu) Received: by sdaoden.eu (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C23FD16059; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 17:34:38 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 17:34:37 +0200 From: Steffen Nurpmeso To: Kostya Berger Cc: Gary Jennejohn , "zeising+freebsd@daemonic.se" , "current@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: =?utf-8?B?0JI=?= =?utf-8?B?INC+0YLQstC10YI=?= =?utf-8?B?INC90LA6?= Re: ? ????? ??: Re: FYI: forum web site is .. unreadable Message-ID: <20200623153437.m2NtN%steffen@sdaoden.eu> In-Reply-To: <811812565.4605472.1592924651983@mail.yahoo.com> References: <20200622231452.oAI4n%steffen@sdaoden.eu> <20200623084816.71af4250@ernst.home> <1673290029.4164246.1592903106580@mail.yahoo.com> <20200623130733.658b4a40@ernst.home> <20200623144639.8mJH9%steffen@sdaoden.eu> <811812565.4605472.1592924651983@mail.yahoo.com> Mail-Followup-To: Kostya Berger , Gary Jennejohn , "zeising+freebsd@daemonic.se" , "current@freebsd.org" User-Agent: s-nail v14.9.19-60-g74aff022 OpenPGP: id=EE19E1C1F2F7054F8D3954D8308964B51883A0DD; url=https://ftp.sdaoden.eu/steffen.asc; preference=signencrypt BlahBlahBlah: Any stupid boy can crush a beetle. But all the professors in the world can make no bugs. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49rrF65Ygnz3T3K X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of steffen@sdaoden.eu designates 217.144.132.164 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=steffen@sdaoden.eu X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.47 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.98)[-0.982]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+a:c]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.98)[-0.975]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[freebsd]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[sdaoden.eu]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.23)[0.229]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; MID_CONTAINS_FROM(1.00)[]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[yahoo.co.uk]; RCVD_COUNT_ZERO(0.00)[0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15987, ipnet:217.144.128.0/20, country:DE]; FREEMAIL_CC(0.00)[gmail.com,daemonic.se,freebsd.org]; SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS(1.50)[]; SUBJECT_HAS_QUESTION(0.00)[] X-Spam: Yes X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 15:44:43 -0000 Kostya Berger wrote in <811812565.4605472.1592924651983@mail.yahoo.com>: ||=D0=B2=D1=82, 23 =D0=B8=D1=8E=D0=BD. 2020 =D0=B2 17:55 Steffen Nurpmeso || =D0=BD=D0=B0=D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=81=D0=B0=D0=BB(-=D0=B0): ||Gary Jennejohn wrote in ||<[2]20200623130733.658b4a40@ernst.home[/2]>: |||On Tue, 23 Jun 2020 09:05:06 +0000 (UTC) |||Kostya Berger <[3]bergerkos@yahoo.co.uk[/3]> wrote: ||| |||> Looks fine in my Firefox. No such problems. Locally built Firefox. ||... |||> ____, 23 ______. 2020 __ 10:32 Niclas Zeising ic.[/4]\ (Actually an error in my html filter, hm.) |||> se> ______________(-__): On 2020-06-23 08:48, Gary Jennejohn wrote: |||>> On Tue, 23 Jun 2020 01:14:52 +0200 |||>> Steffen Nurpmeso <[5]steffen@sdaoden.eu[/5]> wrote: ||... |||>>> Normally i do not do forums (web interface etc etc), but i was |||>>> interested in ZFS encryption support and so i searched, and found |||>>> a page[1].__ Now when i open that on a glibc Linux box with |||>>> |||>>>__ __ #?0|kent:src$ prt-get info firefox-bin ||... |||>>>__ __ Version:__ __ __ 77.0.1 ||.. |||>>> i.e. Mozilla.com-compiled firefox, then i see a small forum |||>>> "frame" on the right side, it is right of the "Foundation" link in |||>>> the link bar.__ It is just large enought to place "To be honest," |||>>> in a single line, on a, well, pretty wide screen. |||>>> |||>>>__ __ [1] [6]https://forums.freebsd.org/threads/native-encryption-of= -z\ |||>>>fs.70\[/6] |||>>>284/ |||>>> |||>>> Ciao, and good night from Germany, |||>>>=20 |||>>=20 |||>> I see exactly the same bad formatting with the standard firefox \ |||>> port.__ All the |||>> text is pushed to the right. |||>>=20 |||>> seamonkey works, but it's been removed from ports. |||>=20 |||> It looks fine on my 1080p display, using Firefox from FreeBSD package= s. ||| |||I just installed the latest firefox from the package repository and \ |||the forum page |||is still mis-formatted. ||| |||This is the only website of the many I use which displays this error. ||| |||My display is 2560x1440 (probably irrelevant). Not really all that \ |||important |||to me in any case. | | [2] mailto:20200623130733.658b4a40@ernst.home | [3] mailto:bergerkos@yahoo.co.uk | [4] mailto:freebsd@daemonic. | [5] mailto:steffen@sdaoden.eu | [6] https://forums.freebsd.org/threads/native-encryption-of-zfs.70\ | ||I have registered myself at the forum, but it is still unusable ||even thereafter. I looked at the source but i miss two decades of ||CSS etc. development to truly understand what there is, and since ||even the stylesheets are generated via monstrous URLs from a PHP ||script (!!) i cannot tell at all what is going on, to give a hint. ||But FreeBSD is not a marginal side note, even if i do not have ||a FreeBSD system with X display right now. | ||Accessing forums.freebsd.org via lynx "looks much better", but it ||says "JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please ||enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.". ||Forums are not for me, it was just for your interest. |Can it be due to some interference/filtering by your router or your \ |ISP? I have never EVER seen such problem in Firefox on ANY system. ??? I cannot imagine this. |Did you try from Windows from the same place? I have not used Windows in over twenty years, i do not know! |Anyway, you can try resetting your Firefox to defaults. I am using a default Firefox, no add-ons or anything. I only have a stylesheet which increases the font used in menus, *if* that is still used, actually, one of the versions passed changed that i think, it is that ../chrome/userChrome.css file (and it took many hours to find this possibility). |[1]=D0=9E=D1=82=D0=BF=D1=80=D0=B0=D0=B2=D0=BB=D0=B5=D0=BD=D0=BE =D0=B8=D0= =B7 Yahoo =D0=9F=D0=BE=D1=87=D1=82=D1=8B =D0=B4=D0=BB=D1=8F Android[/1] | | [1] https://go.onelink.me/107872968?pid=3DInProduct&c=3DGlobal_Inte= rnal_\ | YGrowth_AndroidEmailSig__AndroidUsers&af_wl=3Dym&af_sub1=3DInte= rnal&\ | amp;af_sub2=3DGlobal_YGrowth&af_sub3=3DEmailSignature --steffen | |Der Kragenbaer, The moon bear, |der holt sich munter he cheerfully and one by one |einen nach dem anderen runter wa.ks himself off |(By Robert Gernhardt) From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Tue Jun 23 15:49:43 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30F44330F0E for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 15:49:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steffen@sdaoden.eu) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49rrLt72tYz3TdC for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 15:49:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steffen@sdaoden.eu) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id EFF44330E90; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 15:49:42 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFBC4330F02 for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 15:49:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steffen@sdaoden.eu) Received: from sdaoden.eu (sdaoden.eu [217.144.132.164]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49rrLt2SsBz3TXm for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 15:49:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steffen@sdaoden.eu) Received: by sdaoden.eu (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 83EE71605B; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 17:40:09 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 17:40:08 +0200 From: Steffen Nurpmeso To: Kostya Berger Cc: Gary Jennejohn , "zeising+freebsd@daemonic.se" , "current@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: =?utf-8?B?0JI=?= =?utf-8?B?INC+0YLQstC10YI=?= =?utf-8?B?INC90LA6?= Re: ? ????? ??: Re: FYI: forum web site is .. unreadable Message-ID: <20200623154008.Avo8p%steffen@sdaoden.eu> In-Reply-To: <20200623153437.m2NtN%steffen@sdaoden.eu> References: <20200622231452.oAI4n%steffen@sdaoden.eu> <20200623084816.71af4250@ernst.home> <1673290029.4164246.1592903106580@mail.yahoo.com> <20200623130733.658b4a40@ernst.home> <20200623144639.8mJH9%steffen@sdaoden.eu> <811812565.4605472.1592924651983@mail.yahoo.com> <20200623153437.m2NtN%steffen@sdaoden.eu> Mail-Followup-To: Kostya Berger , Gary Jennejohn , "zeising+freebsd@daemonic.se" , "current@freebsd.org" User-Agent: s-nail v14.9.19-60-g74aff022 OpenPGP: id=EE19E1C1F2F7054F8D3954D8308964B51883A0DD; url=https://ftp.sdaoden.eu/steffen.asc; preference=signencrypt BlahBlahBlah: Any stupid boy can crush a beetle. But all the professors in the world can make no bugs. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49rrLt2SsBz3TXm X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of steffen@sdaoden.eu designates 217.144.132.164 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=steffen@sdaoden.eu X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.47 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.98)[-0.982]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+a:c]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.98)[-0.975]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[freebsd]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[sdaoden.eu]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.23)[0.226]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; MID_CONTAINS_FROM(1.00)[]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[yahoo.co.uk]; RCVD_COUNT_ZERO(0.00)[0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15987, ipnet:217.144.128.0/20, country:DE]; FREEMAIL_CC(0.00)[gmail.com,daemonic.se,freebsd.org]; SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS(1.50)[]; SUBJECT_HAS_QUESTION(0.00)[] X-Spam: Yes X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 15:49:43 -0000 Steffen Nurpmeso wrote in <20200623153437.m2NtN%steffen@sdaoden.eu>: |Kostya Berger wrote in |<811812565.4605472.1592924651983@mail.yahoo.com>: |||=D0=B2=D1=82, 23 =D0=B8=D1=8E=D0=BD. 2020 =D0=B2 17:55 Steffen Nurpmeso ||| =D0=BD=D0=B0=D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=81=D0=B0=D0=BB(-=D0=B0): |||Gary Jennejohn wrote in |||<[2]20200623130733.658b4a40@ernst.home[/2]>: ||||On Tue, 23 Jun 2020 09:05:06 +0000 (UTC) ||||Kostya Berger <[3]bergerkos@yahoo.co.uk[/3]> wrote: ... ||||> ____, 23 ______. 2020 __ 10:32 Niclas Zeising n\ ||||> ic.[/4]\ | |(Actually an error in my html filter, hm.) Ha! Not true! ; wrote:
|
|> Looks fine in = my Fir=3D efox. No such problems. Locally built Firefox.
... |>  ____, 23 ______. 2020 __ 10:32 Niclas Zeisin= g<=3D ;zeising+freebsd@daemonic.\
|>&= nbsp=3D ; se> ______________(-__):  On 2020-06-23 08:48, Gary Jennejohn= w=3D rote:
|>> On Tue, 23 Jun 2020 01:14:52 +0200 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5B663314AC for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 16:04:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freqlabs@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::24b:4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49rrh8420Rz3Vjt for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 16:04:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freqlabs@FreeBSD.org) Received: from Ryans-MBP.attlocal.net (unknown [IPv6:2600:1700:358a:c660:408c:dcf3:301c:3a64]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: freqlabs/mail) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6FCBE170C9 for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 16:04:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freqlabs@FreeBSD.org) Subject: Re: openzfs-kmod build error To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org References: <1250230056.4543844.1592922228227.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <1250230056.4543844.1592922228227@mail.yahoo.com> From: Ryan Moeller Message-ID: <260a4489-031a-5b61-d8e6-c0572a2bd597@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 12:04:39 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 16:04:40 -0000 On 6/23/20 11:12 AM, Rick Macklem wrote: > Kostya Berger wrote: >> CURRENT r362292 >> sysutils/openzfs-kmod build aborts with error:............... >> /usr/ports/sysutils/openzfs-kmod/work/zfs->c0eb5c35e/module/os/freebsd/zfs/zfs_vfsops.c:128:19: error: >> incompatible pointer types initializing 'vfs_checkexp_t *' (aka 'int (*)(struct >> mount *, struct sockaddr *, unsigned long *, struct ucred **, int *, int *)') with >> an expression of type 'int (vfs_t *, struct sockaddr *, int *, struct ucred **, int >> *, int **)' (aka 'int (struct mount *, struct sockaddr *, int *, struct ucred **, >> int *, int **)') [-Werror,-Wincompatible-pointer-types] >> .vfs_checkexp = zfs_checkexp, >> ^~~~~~~~~~~~ >> /usr/ports/sysutils/openzfs-kmod/work/zfs->c0eb5c35e/module/os/freebsd/zfs/zfs_vfsops.c:1911:56: error: >> incompatible pointer types passing 'int *' to parameter of type 'uint64_t *' >> (aka 'unsigned long *') [-Werror,-Wincompatible-pointer-types] >> return (vfs_stdcheckexp(zfsvfs->z_parent->z_vfs, nam, extflagsp, >> ^~~~~~~~~ >> /usr/src/sys/sys/mount.h:980:17: note: passing argument to parameter here >> vfs_checkexp_t vfs_stdcheckexp; >> ^ >> /usr/ports/sysutils/openzfs-kmod/work/zfs->c0eb5c35e/module/os/freebsd/zfs/zfs_vfsops.c:1912:32: error: >> incompatible pointer types passing 'int **' to parameter of type 'int *'; >> dereference with * [-Werror,-Wincompatible-pointer-types] >> credanonp, numsecflavors, secflavors)); >> ^~~~~~~~~~ >> * >> /usr/src/sys/sys/mount.h:980:17: note: passing argument to parameter here >> vfs_checkexp_t vfs_stdcheckexp; >> ^ >> 3 errors generated. >> *** Error code 1 >> >> Stop. > Post r362158, the argument types change. Since they are just passed to > vfs_stdcheckexp(), all that needs to be done is changing the types of > the arguments. > > freqlabs@ volunteered to do this upstream, but I don't know if/when > that gets applied to the port? The port has already been updated, so update the ports tree checkout and you should be good. -Ryan > If you can fix this, simply replace: > zfs_checkexp(vfs_t *vfsp, struct sockaddr *nam, int *extflagsp, > struct ucred **credanonp, int *numsecflavors, int **secflavors) > > with > > zfs_checkexp(vfs_t *vfsp, struct sockaddr *nam, uint64_t *extflagsp, > struct ucred **credanonp, int *numsecflavors, int *secflavors) > > in the two places it exists in zfs_vfsops.c. > > rick > > > > With kindest regards, > Kostya Berger > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Tue Jun 23 17:26:03 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C495C33350D for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 17:26:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@grem.de) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49rtV33hY0z3bM7 for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 17:26:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@grem.de) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 7EB5A33350B; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 17:26:03 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E79D3337B6 for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 17:26:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@grem.de) Received: from mail.evolve.de (mail.evolve.de [213.239.217.29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.evolve.de", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49rtV25dZsz3bDX for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 17:26:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@grem.de) Received: by mail.evolve.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id beb4bd82; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 17:26:00 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=grem.de; h=date:from:to:cc :subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=20180501; bh=2r4r+O2D Bt9v/DhbE0LoJDvE4c4=; b=c5tvuvUuHWBbwxk1lk8UprKNddZc74VBX26BezaK wD7+HOcImsL4JRw7yaGU/DwEUPmxXaja+/VRKpN+L5OaU+gOpEC/bNxWvoC1vLJB bd1F8DJb6WJxW/QyMUFM5ESLCN0t4CxZqYEKCIpTFYRP6HPvTp6QKyg+xQQNRUb/ 3vnlNigAgWF0cyzTAWB48ZGHPBxka/h85GwIKpqRaNmm1qJf2YRzblwHBTECDfvI J7VtTccpsKJi5x1jjGFkqevr0QSV9E5KwLyrwB5YgdaTKZVhISE9N13w+sDBivWV udyBJ3+noQDyAIAKPXf9wZOO9mROX6mR2PN79YLakcwoZA== DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=grem.de; h=date:from:to:cc :subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=20180501; b=HW IS7E9+jjxMT4GT57Zyw2i0vvQp2YarQwNJQbaNL9FfNy5ptH/7CeWV3G5FLoVGj9 AHCwfAZDLhtzA5jg9ggbz7nrNGbVKcLdSwO7TPTntgww/1ys53ig2qt2wZ+Z6Xot EAhAeSAB7lzPKBn/ftwEu4UglRRC8U/Vq+m0Or+S1M0KFySJAj9NZLW+pOwF9sPw Q6oT7v8ARq4lqhK9OgDc+wfYaatboCo52dvxwZ0qBY8j3/Ft3LYtjDWv+ik496fW mBO5ao4DQ7Iu8h8jkMdlW5N1UNAAoefzmWqeZZafRlUs0sFPdbzrenhZlB9ZgxN6 pKSDBCz/xdNWsaeju29Q== Received: by mail.evolve.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id a7bc8b66 (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305:256:NO); Tue, 23 Jun 2020 17:25:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 19:25:23 +0200 From: Michael Gmelin To: Steffen Nurpmeso Cc: Kostya Berger , Gary Jennejohn , "zeising+freebsd@daemonic.se" , "current@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: =?UTF-8?B?0JIg0L7RgtCy0LXRgiDQvdCwOg==?= Re: ? ????? ??: Re: FYI: forum web site is .. unreadable Message-ID: <20200623192523.7c59577d@bsd64.grem.de> In-Reply-To: <20200623153437.m2NtN%steffen@sdaoden.eu> References: <20200622231452.oAI4n%steffen@sdaoden.eu> <20200623084816.71af4250@ernst.home> <1673290029.4164246.1592903106580@mail.yahoo.com> <20200623130733.658b4a40@ernst.home> <20200623144639.8mJH9%steffen@sdaoden.eu> <811812565.4605472.1592924651983@mail.yahoo.com> <20200623153437.m2NtN%steffen@sdaoden.eu> X-Face: $wrgCtfdVw_H9WAY?S&9+/F"!41z'L$uo*WzT8miX?kZ~W~Lr5W7v?j0Sde\mwB&/ypo^}> +a'4xMc^^KroE~+v^&^#[B">soBo1y6(TW6#UZiC]o>C6`ej+i Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAJFBMVEWJBwe5BQDl LASZU0/LTEWEfHbyj0Txi32+sKrp1Mv944X8/fm1rS+cAAAACXBIWXMAAAsTAAAL EwEAmpwYAAAAB3RJTUUH3wESCxwC7OBhbgAAACFpVFh0Q29tbWVudAAAAAAAQ3Jl YXRlZCB3aXRoIFRoZSBHSU1QbbCXAAAAAghJREFUOMu11DFvEzEUAGCfEhBVFzuq AKkLd0O6VrIQsLXVSZXoWE5N1K3DobBBA9fQpRWc8OkWouaIjedWKiyREOKs+3PY fvalCNjgLVHeF7/3bMtBzV8C/VsQ8tecEgCcDgrzjekwKZ7TwsJZd/ywEKwwP+ZM 8P3drTsAwWn2mpWuDDuYiK1bFs6De0KUUFw0tWxm+D4AIhuuvZqtyWYeO7jQ4Aea 7jUqI+ixhQoHex4WshEvSXdood7stlv4oSuFOC4tqGcr0NjEqXgV4mMJO38nld4+ xKNxRDon7khyKVqY7YR4d+Cg0OMrkWXZOM7YDkEfKiilCn1qYv4mighZiynuHHOA Wq9QJq+BIES7lMFUtcikMnkDGHUoncA+uHgrP0ctIEqfwLHzeSo+eUA66AqzwN6n 2ZHJhw6Qh/PoyC/QENyEyC/AyNjq74Bs+3UH0xYwzDUC4B97HgLocg1QLYgDDO1v f3UX9Y307Ew4AHh67YAFFsxEpkXwpXY3eIgMhAAE3R19L919nNnuD2wlPcDE3UeT L2ytEICQib9BXgS2fU8PrD82ToYO1OEmMSnYTjSqSv9wdC0tPYC+rQRQD9ESnldF CyqfmiYW+tlALt8gH2xrMdC/youbjzPXEun+/ReXsMCDyve3dZc09fn2Oas8oXGc Jj6/fOeK5UmSMPmf/jL+GD8BEj0k/Fn6IO4AAAAASUVORK5CYII= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49rtV25dZsz3bDX X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=grem.de header.s=20180501 header.b=c5tvuvUu; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of freebsd@grem.de designates 213.239.217.29 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=freebsd@grem.de X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.78 / 15.00]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[grem.de:s=20180501]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:213.239.217.29/32]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-0.995]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[freebsd]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[grem.de:+]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.74)[-0.742]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[grem.de]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.04)[-1.043]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:213.239.192.0/18, country:DE]; FREEMAIL_CC(0.00)[yahoo.co.uk,gmail.com,daemonic.se,freebsd.org]; SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS(1.50)[]; SUBJECT_HAS_QUESTION(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 17:26:03 -0000 On Tue, 23 Jun 2020 17:34:37 +0200 Steffen Nurpmeso wrote: > Kostya Berger wrote in > <811812565.4605472.1592924651983@mail.yahoo.com>: > ||=D0=B2=D1=82, 23 =D0=B8=D1=8E=D0=BD. 2020 =D0=B2 17:55 Steffen Nurpmeso > || =D0=BD=D0=B0=D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=81=D0=B0=D0=BB(-=D0= =B0): > ||Gary Jennejohn wrote in > ||<[2]20200623130733.658b4a40@ernst.home[/2]>: > |||On Tue, 23 Jun 2020 09:05:06 +0000 (UTC) > |||Kostya Berger <[3]bergerkos@yahoo.co.uk[/3]> wrote: > ||| > |||> Looks fine in my Firefox. No such problems. Locally built > Firefox. ||... > |||> ____, 23 ______. 2020 __ 10:32 Niclas > Zeising ic.[/4]\ =20 >=20 > (Actually an error in my html filter, hm.) >=20 > |||> se> ______________(-__): On 2020-06-23 08:48, Gary Jennejohn > wrote: |||>> On Tue, 23 Jun 2020 01:14:52 +0200 > |||>> Steffen Nurpmeso <[5]steffen@sdaoden.eu[/5]> wrote: =20 > ||... > |||>>> Normally i do not do forums (web interface etc etc), but i was > |||>>> interested in ZFS encryption support and so i searched, and > found |||>>> a page[1].__ Now when i open that on a glibc Linux box > with |||>>> > |||>>>__ __ #?0|kent:src$ prt-get info firefox-bin =20 > ||... > |||>>>__ __ Version:__ __ __ 77.0.1 =20 > ||.. > |||>>> i.e. Mozilla.com-compiled firefox, then i see a small forum > |||>>> "frame" on the right side, it is right of the "Foundation" > link in |||>>> the link bar.__ It is just large enought to place "To > be honest," |||>>> in a single line, on a, well, pretty wide screen. > |||>>> > |||>>>__ __ [1] > [6]https://forums.freebsd.org/threads/native-encryption-of-z\ > |||>>>fs.70\[/6] |||>>>284/ > |||>>> > |||>>> Ciao, and good night from Germany, > |||>>> =20 > |||>>=20 > |||>> I see exactly the same bad formatting with the standard > firefox \ |||>> port.__ All the > |||>> text is pushed to the right. > |||>>=20 > |||>> seamonkey works, but it's been removed from ports. =20 > |||>=20 > |||> It looks fine on my 1080p display, using Firefox from FreeBSD > packages. ||| > |||I just installed the latest firefox from the package repository > and \ |||the forum page > |||is still mis-formatted. > ||| > |||This is the only website of the many I use which displays this > error. ||| > |||My display is 2560x1440 (probably irrelevant). Not really all > that \ |||important > |||to me in any case. > | > | [2] mailto:20200623130733.658b4a40@ernst.home > | [3] mailto:bergerkos@yahoo.co.uk > | [4] mailto:freebsd@daemonic. > | [5] mailto:steffen@sdaoden.eu > | [6] > https://forums.freebsd.org/threads/native-encryption-of-zfs.70\ | > ||I have registered myself at the forum, but it is still unusable > ||even thereafter. I looked at the source but i miss two decades of > ||CSS etc. development to truly understand what there is, and since > ||even the stylesheets are generated via monstrous URLs from a PHP > ||script (!!) i cannot tell at all what is going on, to give a hint. > ||But FreeBSD is not a marginal side note, even if i do not have > ||a FreeBSD system with X display right now. > | > ||Accessing forums.freebsd.org via lynx "looks much better", but it > ||says "JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please > ||enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.". > ||Forums are not for me, it was just for your interest. >=20 > |Can it be due to some interference/filtering by your router or your > \ |ISP? I have never EVER seen such problem in Firefox on ANY system. >=20 > ??? I cannot imagine this. >=20 > |Did you try from Windows from the same place? >=20 > I have not used Windows in over twenty years, i do not know! >=20 > |Anyway, you can try resetting your Firefox to defaults. >=20 > I am using a default Firefox, no add-ons or anything. I only have > a stylesheet which increases the font used in menus, *if* that is > still used, actually, one of the versions passed changed that > i think, it is that ../chrome/userChrome.css file (and it took > many hours to find this possibility). >=20 Data point: I tried on latest Firefox on macOS, no problems there (but the resolution isn't as high as yours). Does it look less broken on different devices/resolutions when using "Web Developer" =3D> "Responsive Design Mode"? -m --=20 Michael Gmelin From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Tue Jun 23 17:54:44 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4020E33449B for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 17:54:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steffen@sdaoden.eu) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49rv776sBCz3d4M for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 17:54:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steffen@sdaoden.eu) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id EB5AE333EED; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 17:54:43 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB1F033449A for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 17:54:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steffen@sdaoden.eu) Received: from sdaoden.eu (sdaoden.eu [217.144.132.164]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49rv77185xz3ct8 for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 17:54:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steffen@sdaoden.eu) Received: by sdaoden.eu (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C05D016059; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 19:47:22 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 19:47:21 +0200 From: Steffen Nurpmeso To: Michael Gmelin Cc: Kostya Berger , Gary Jennejohn , "zeising+freebsd@daemonic.se" , "current@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: =?utf-8?B?0JI=?= =?utf-8?B?INC+0YLQstC10YI=?= =?utf-8?B?INC90LA6?= Re: ? ????? ??: Re: FYI: forum web site is .. unreadable Message-ID: <20200623174721.VILrl%steffen@sdaoden.eu> In-Reply-To: <20200623192523.7c59577d@bsd64.grem.de> References: <20200622231452.oAI4n%steffen@sdaoden.eu> <20200623084816.71af4250@ernst.home> <1673290029.4164246.1592903106580@mail.yahoo.com> <20200623130733.658b4a40@ernst.home> <20200623144639.8mJH9%steffen@sdaoden.eu> <811812565.4605472.1592924651983@mail.yahoo.com> <20200623153437.m2NtN%steffen@sdaoden.eu> <20200623192523.7c59577d@bsd64.grem.de> Mail-Followup-To: Michael Gmelin , Kostya Berger , Gary Jennejohn , "zeising+freebsd@daemonic.se" , "current@freebsd.org" User-Agent: s-nail v14.9.19-60-g74aff022 OpenPGP: id=EE19E1C1F2F7054F8D3954D8308964B51883A0DD; url=https://ftp.sdaoden.eu/steffen.asc; preference=signencrypt BlahBlahBlah: Any stupid boy can crush a beetle. But all the professors in the world can make no bugs. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49rv77185xz3ct8 X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of steffen@sdaoden.eu designates 217.144.132.164 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=steffen@sdaoden.eu X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.38 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.98)[-0.984]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+a:c]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.98)[-0.983]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[freebsd]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[sdaoden.eu]; RCPT_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.14)[0.145]; MID_CONTAINS_FROM(1.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_ZERO(0.00)[0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15987, ipnet:217.144.128.0/20, country:DE]; FREEMAIL_CC(0.00)[yahoo.co.uk,gmail.com,daemonic.se,freebsd.org]; SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS(1.50)[]; SUBJECT_HAS_QUESTION(0.00)[] X-Spam: Yes X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 17:54:44 -0000 Hello!! Michael Gmelin wrote in <20200623192523.7c59577d@bsd64.grem.de>: |On Tue, 23 Jun 2020 17:34:37 +0200 |Steffen Nurpmeso wrote: |> Kostya Berger wrote in |> <811812565.4605472.1592924651983@mail.yahoo.com>: |>||=D0=B2=D1=82, 23 =D0=B8=D1=8E=D0=BD. 2020 =D0=B2 17:55 Steffen Nurpmeso |>|| =D0=BD=D0=B0=D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=81=D0=B0=D0=BB(-=D0= =B0): |>||Gary Jennejohn wrote in |>||<[2]20200623130733.658b4a40@ernst.home[/2]>: |>|||On Tue, 23 Jun 2020 09:05:06 +0000 (UTC) |>|||Kostya Berger <[3]bergerkos@yahoo.co.uk[/3]> wrote: |>||| |>|||> Looks fine in my Firefox. No such problems. Locally built I clean this mess, ok? |>|||> se> ______________(-__): On 2020-06-23 08:48, Gary Jennejohn |> wrote: |||>> On Tue, 23 Jun 2020 01:14:52 +0200 |>|||>> Steffen Nurpmeso <[5]steffen@sdaoden.eu[/5]> wrote: =20 |>||... |>|||>>> Normally i do not do forums (web interface etc etc), but i was |>|||>>> interested in ZFS encryption support and so i searched, and |> found |||>>> a page[1].__ Now when i open that on a glibc Linux box |> with |||>>> |>|||>>>__ __ #?0|kent:src$ prt-get info firefox-bin =20 ... |>|||>>> i.e. Mozilla.com-compiled firefox, then i see a small forum |>|||>>> "frame" on the right side, it is right of the "Foundation" |> link in |||>>> the link bar.__ It is just large enought to place "To |> be honest," |||>>> in a single line, on a, well, pretty wide screen. ... |>|||>> I see exactly the same bad formatting with the standard |> firefox \ |||>> port.__ All the |>|||>> text is pushed to the right. |>|||>>=20 |>|||>> seamonkey works, but it's been removed from ports. =20 |>|||>=20 |>|||> It looks fine on my 1080p display, using Firefox from FreeBSD |> packages. ||| |>|||I just installed the latest firefox from the package repository |> and \ |||the forum page |>|||is still mis-formatted. |>||| |>|||This is the only website of the many I use which displays this |> error. ||| |>|||My display is 2560x1440 (probably irrelevant). Not really all |> that \ |||important |>|||to me in any case. ... |>|Anyway, you can try resetting your Firefox to defaults. |>=20 |> I am using a default Firefox, no add-ons or anything. I only have |> a stylesheet which increases the font used in menus, *if* that is |> still used, actually, one of the versions passed changed that |> i think, it is that ../chrome/userChrome.css file (and it took |> many hours to find this possibility). | |Data point: I tried on latest Firefox on macOS, no problems there (but |the resolution isn't as high as yours). | |Does it look less broken on different devices/resolutions when using |"Web Developer" =3D> "Responsive Design Mode"? Now, that i never tried, it is a mysterious thing, but when i enabled it i got a small window inside the normal window, and then it looked just fine! So i disabled that again, and resized the browser window as such, and when the window is smaller than 470 then suddenly the content springs into existence!! Thanks for this pointer!! --steffen | |Der Kragenbaer, The moon bear, |der holt sich munter he cheerfully and one by one |einen nach dem anderen runter wa.ks himself off |(By Robert Gernhardt) From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Tue Jun 23 19:29:39 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 238AF3368DE; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 19:29:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lwhsu@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:6074::16:84]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49rxDg056mz419w; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 19:29:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lwhsu@freebsd.org) Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1129) id DF649D370; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 19:29:38 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 19:29:38 +0000 From: Li-Wen Hsu To: freebsd-testing@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD CI Weekly Report 2020-06-21 Message-ID: <20200623192938.GA23070@freefall.freebsd.org> Reply-To: freebsd-testing@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 19:29:39 -0000 (Please send the followup to freebsd-testing@ and note Reply-To is set.) FreeBSD CI Weekly Report 2020-06-21 =================================== Here is a summary of the FreeBSD Continuous Integration results for the period from 2020-06-15 to 2020-06-21. During this period, we have: * 2272 builds (93.9% (+3.9) passed, 6.1% (-3.9) failed) of buildworld and buildkernel (GENERIC and LINT) were executed on aarch64, amd64, armv6, armv7, i386, mips, mips64, powerpc, powerpc64, powerpcspe, riscv64, sparc64 architectures for head, stable/12, stable/11 branches. * 268 test runs (79.8% (+1.9) passed, 13.1% (-7.5) unstable, 7.1% (+5.6) exception) were executed on amd64, i386, riscv64 architectures for head, stable/12, stable/11 branches. * 100.0 doc and www builds (100% (+3.4) passed) Test case status (on 2020-06-21 23:59): | Branch/Architecture | Total | Pass | Fail | Skipped | | ------------------- | --------- | --------- | ------ | -------- | | head/amd64 | 7863 (0) | 7764 (-9) | 0 (0) | 99 (+9) | | head/i386 | 7861 (0) | 7756 (-6) | 0 (0) | 105 (+6) | | 12-STABLE/amd64 | 7591 (+4) | 7532 (+4) | 0 (0) | 59 (0) | | 12-STABLE/i386 | 7589 (+4) | 7525 (+4) | 0 (0) | 64 (0) | | 11-STABLE/amd64 | 6887 (+2) | 6834 (0) | 0 (-1) | 53 (+3) | | 11-STABLE/i386 | 6885 (+2) | 6833 (+3) | 0 (-1) | 52 (0) | (The statistics from experimental jobs are omitted) If any of the issues found by CI are in your area of interest or expertise please investigate the PRs listed below. The latest web version of this report is available at https://hackmd.io/@FreeBSD-CI/report-20200621 and archive is available at https://hackmd.io/@FreeBSD-CI/ , any help is welcome. ## Failing jobs * https://ci.freebsd.org/job/FreeBSD-head-amd64-gcc6_build/ ``` /usr/local/bin/x86_64-unknown-freebsd12.1-ld: /tmp/obj/workspace/src/amd64.amd64/lib/clang/liblldb/liblldb.a(IOHandlerCursesGUI.o): in function `curses::Window::Box(unsigned int, unsigned int)': /workspace/src/contrib/llvm-project/lldb/source/Core/IOHandlerCursesGUI.cpp:361: undefined reference to `box' /usr/local/bin/x86_64-unknown-freebsd12.1-ld: /workspace/src/contrib/llvm-project/lldb/source/Core/IOHandlerCursesGUI.cpp:361: undefined reference to `box' collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status ``` ## Regressions * lib.libexecinfo.backtrace_test.backtrace_fmt_basic starts failing on amd64 after r360915 https://bugs.freebsd.org/246537 * (head, stable/12, stable/11) 2 tests start failing after llvm10 import * lib.msun.ctrig_test.test_inf_inputs https://bugs.freebsd.org/244732 * (DTrace) common.pid.t_dtrace_contrib.err_D_PROC_OFF_toobig_d https://bugs.freebsd.org/244823 * Lock-order reversals triggered by tests under sys.net.if_lagg_test.* on i386 https://bugs.freebsd.org/244163 Discovered by newly endabled sys.net.* tests. ([r357857](https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/357857)) * sys.net.if_lagg_test.lacp_linkstate_destroy_stress panics i386 kernel https://bugs.freebsd.org/244168 Discovered by newly endabled sys.net.* tests. ([r357857](https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/357857)) Fix in review: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D25284 ## Failing and Flaky tests (from experimental jobs) * https://ci.freebsd.org/job/FreeBSD-head-amd64-dtrace_test/ * cddl.usr.sbin.dtrace.common.misc.t_dtrace_contrib.tst_dynopt_d * https://bugs.freebsd.org/237641 * cddl.usr.sbin.dtrace.common.pid.t_dtrace_contrib.err_D_PROC_OFF_toobig_d * https://bugs.freebsd.org/244823 * https://ci.freebsd.org/job/FreeBSD-head-amd64-test_zfs/ * There are ~13 failing and ~109 skipped cases, including flakey ones, see https://ci.freebsd.org/job/FreeBSD-head-amd64-test_zfs/lastCompletedBuild/testReport/ for more details * Work for cleaning these failing cass are in progress * https://ci.freebsd.org/job/FreeBSD-head-amd64-test_ltp/ * Total 3749 tests, 2277 success, 646 failures, 826 skipped ## Disabled Tests * sys.fs.tmpfs.mount_test.large https://bugs.freebsd.org/212862 * sys.fs.tmpfs.link_test.kqueue https://bugs.freebsd.org/213662 * sys.kqueue.libkqueue.kqueue_test.main https://bugs.freebsd.org/233586 * sys.kern.ptrace_test.ptrace__PT_KILL_competing_stop https://bugs.freebsd.org/220841 * lib.libc.regex.exhaust_test.regcomp_too_big (i386 only) https://bugs.freebsd.org/237450 * sys.netinet.socket_afinet.socket_afinet_bind_zero https://bugs.freebsd.org/238781 * sys.netpfil.pf.names.names * sys.netpfil.pf.synproxy.synproxy https://bugs.freebsd.org/238870 * sys.kern.ptrace_test.ptrace__follow_fork_child_detached_unrelated_debugger https://bugs.freebsd.org/239292 * sys.kern.ptrace_test.ptrace__follow_fork_both_attached_unrelated_debugger https://bugs.freebsd.org/239397 * sys.kern.ptrace_test.ptrace__parent_sees_exit_after_child_debugger https://bugs.freebsd.org/239399 * sys.kern.ptrace_test.ptrace__follow_fork_parent_detached_unrelated_debugger https://bugs.freebsd.org/239425 * lib.libc.gen.getmntinfo_test.getmntinfo_test https://bugs.freebsd.org/240049 * sys.sys.qmath_test.qdivq_s64q https://bugs.freebsd.org/240219 * sys.kern.ptrace_test.ptrace__getppid https://bugs.freebsd.org/240510 * lib.libc.sys.stat_test.stat_socket https://bugs.freebsd.org/240621 * lib.libarchive.functional_test.test_write_filter_zstd https://bugs.freebsd.org/240683 * lib.libcasper.services.cap_dns.dns_test.main https://bugs.freebsd.org/241435 * local.kyua.* (31 cases) & local.lutok.* (3 cases) on 11-i386 https://ci.freebsd.org/job/FreeBSD-stable-11-i386-test/2278/testReport/ * sys.kern.ptrace_test.ptrace__procdesc_reparent_wait_child https://bugs.freebsd.org/243605 * sys.kern.ptrace_test.ptrace__parent_wait_after_attach https://bugs.freebsd.org/244055 * sys.kern.ptrace_test.ptrace__parent_exits_before_child https://bugs.freebsd.org/244056 * sys.net.if_lagg_test.witness (i386) https://bugs.freebsd.org/244163 * PipePdfork.WildcardWait in sys.capsicum.capsicum-test.main https://bugs.freebsd.org/244165 * sys.net.if_lagg_test.lacp_linkstate_destroy_stress (i386) https://bugs.freebsd.org/244168 * sys.netinet6.frag6.frag6_07.frag6_07 https://bugs.freebsd.org/244170 * sys.netinet.fibs_test.udp_dontroute6 https://bugs.freebsd.org/244172 * sys.netpfil.pf.nat.exhaust https://bugs.freebsd.org/244703 ## Issues ### Cause build fails * https://bugs.freebsd.org/233735 Possible build race: genoffset.o /usr/src/sys/sys/types.h: error: machine/endian.h: No such file or directory * https://bugs.freebsd.org/233769 Possible build race: ld: error: unable to find library -lgcc_s ### Cause kernel panics * https://bugs.freebsd.org/238870 sys.netpfil.pf.names.names and sys.netpfil.pf.synproxy.synproxy cause panic ### Open * https://bugs.freebsd.org/237403 Tests in sys/opencrypto should be converted to Python3 * https://bugs.freebsd.org/237641 Flakey test case: common.misc.t_dtrace_contrib.tst_dynopt_d * https://bugs.freebsd.org/237656 "Freed UMA keg (rtentry) was not empty (18 items). Lost 1 pages of memory." seen when running sys/netipsec tests * https://bugs.freebsd.org/238781 sys.netinet.socket_afinet.socket_afinet_bind_zero does not work when mac_portacl(4) loaded * https://bugs.freebsd.org/239292 Flakey test case: sys.kern.ptrace_test.ptrace__follow_fork_child_detached_unrelated_debugger * https://bugs.freebsd.org/239397 Flakey test case: sys.kern.ptrace_test.ptrace__follow_fork_both_attached_unrelated_debugger * https://bugs.freebsd.org/239399 Flakey test case: sys.kern.ptrace_test.ptrace__parent_sees_exit_after_child_debugger * https://bugs.freebsd.org/239425 Flakey test case: sys.kern.ptrace_test.ptrace__follow_fork_parent_detached_unrelated_debugger * https://bugs.freebsd.org/241662 Flakey test case: lib.libarchive.functional_test.test_fuzz_iso9660 * https://bugs.freebsd.org/246443 sys.net.if_clone_test.epair_stress sometimes exceeds timeout limit but not caught by kyua ### Others * [Tickets related to testing@](https://preview.tinyurl.com/y9maauwg) From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Wed Jun 24 08:20:46 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B7583465EA for ; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 08:20:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from melifaro@ipfw.ru) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49sGLP67fwz3W18 for ; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 08:20:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from melifaro@ipfw.ru) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id D0C8B3468F0; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 08:20:45 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D06E73467F2; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 08:20:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from melifaro@ipfw.ru) Received: from forward500p.mail.yandex.net (forward500p.mail.yandex.net [77.88.28.110]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49sGLN2j3Hz3Vsh; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 08:20:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from melifaro@ipfw.ru) Received: from mxback8o.mail.yandex.net (mxback8o.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:1a2d::22]) by forward500p.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 62A85940B16; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 11:20:41 +0300 (MSK) Received: from localhost (localhost [::1]) by mxback8o.mail.yandex.net (mxback/Yandex) with ESMTP id QJV6rwobR8-KerWhCQU; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 11:20:40 +0300 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ipfw.ru; s=mail; t=1592986840; bh=f7d0vSj8wXxc4JCNi+ONkiCbiSd/re0T4dC7cDc5sac=; h=Message-Id:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Date:References:To:From; b=MySw7sWzQVYXUn3bXAtZXCHfnoWfQpUtZG5+96PoT34NpCcT6VrYBOL/KJA431yM9 7DjR7Sx1iLNd5Led96bgBTzPemCJv0WZPPFwJ/hGsFcsKiyQnQ2cjNqyq6OEMtb2jx qgKLREptVrqH6o8Wylq/iBh8+iY526qduyY6LlMU= Received: by iva3-64eac1bc5e68.qloud-c.yandex.net with HTTP; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 11:20:40 +0300 From: Alexander V. Chernikov Envelope-From: melifaro@ipfw.ru To: Rodney W. Grimes Cc: "current@FreeBSD.org" , net , freebsd-hackers In-Reply-To: <202006221249.05MCnrKw010397@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> References: <273191592779927@mail.yandex.ru> <202006221249.05MCnrKw010397@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> Subject: Re: routed && route6d removal proposal MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Yamail [ http://yandex.ru ] 5.0 Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2020 09:20:40 +0100 Message-Id: <102621592983711@mail.yandex.ru> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49sGLN2j3Hz3Vsh X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=ipfw.ru header.s=mail header.b=MySw7sWz; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of melifaro@ipfw.ru designates 77.88.28.110 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=melifaro@ipfw.ru X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.44 / 15.00]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_SOME(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[ipfw.ru:s=mail]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.01)[-1.006]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:77.88.0.0/18]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[freebsd.org]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.98)[-0.983]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_GOOD(0.00)[77.88.28.110:from]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[ipfw.ru:+]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.15)[-1.149]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[melifaro@freebsd.org,melifaro@ipfw.ru]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[77.88.28.110:from]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:13238, ipnet:77.88.0.0/18, country:RU]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[melifaro@freebsd.org,melifaro@ipfw.ru] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2020 08:20:46 -0000 22.06.2020, 13:50, "Rodney W. Grimes" : >>  Hey, Hi Rodney, >> >>  I would like to propose removal of sbin/routed and usr.sbin/route6d. > > I disagree with removal, as your analysis is flawed. Thank you for the feedback! > >>  routed(8) is the daemon implementing RIPv2 routing protocol. >>  route6d(8) is the daemon implementing RIPng routing protocol for IPv6. >> >>  RIP [1] was one of the first protocols used in the networking. The first version was implemented back in 1982. > > RIPv1 was implemented in 1982, RIPv2 became RFC2453 in November 1998, and is a current and valid IETF standard, STD56. > It was updated by RFC4822 in February 2007. > >>  1. Network landscape has changed since then. BGP, OSPF, IS-ISIS and other routing protocols have been created and greatly improved over years. People have created and adopted numerous designs leveraging OSPF/ISIS or BGP. >>  RIP became obsolete a while ago as there were no competitive advantage it can offer. > >>  "It is the oldest routing protocol used by the network industry and is considered by many to be inefficient or border-line obsolete." ? [2], 2009 > > RIPv2 is not obosolete, and your reference is not authoritave on what is or is not an obsolete network protocol. Different people have different opinions :-) Let me rephrase the point I'm trying to make: RIP original design was created a long time ago. The current landscape is different: there are multiple protocols that are superset of RIP. There are multiple implementations of these protocols that are easily available. The configuration is not non-zero, but simple. Even further, more and more want their protocol daemon to have an api - and that makes implementations like goBGP extremely popular, moving people from "traditional" routing suites/daemons. With all that in mind, I see RIP popularity and usage going in only one direction. > I know of people using RIPv2 in networks. Collecting people feedback is the goal of this exercise. If there are existing users, then that's certainly a valid point in keeping the daemons in question. > >>  "Today, the only reason you might run across a network running RIPv2 is either that the network is very old and in serious need of an upgrade or the network is running cheaper, consumer-grade routing hardware that can only support RIP" ? [3], 2016. > > Or there simply is no need for anything more complicated. RipV2 is a very simple protocol and works fine for small networks in many settings. > >>  1.1. Nowadays the daemon name is simply misleading. Given situation described above, one does expect far wider functionality from the program named "route[6]d" than just RIP implementation. > > I'll agree the name is missleading, so change it, but removal on your false basis is not. > >>  2. Multiple routing stacks supporting all major routing protocol including RIP exists these days: bird, frr, quagga. Many BGP-only designs in are gaining popularity, so do bgp speakers such as exabgp or gobgp. Nowadays, if one needs dynamic routing on the host, OSPF or BGP speaker is the choice. FreeBSD packages contains well-maintained ports for these. Having RIP[ng] speakers in base offers no advantage. > > Routing stacks? You mean routing daemons? Forcing users to install bir, frr or quagga when all they need, or have been using for a long time is in base ripv2 is not good for users. Routing protocol suite, routing daemons, etc.. The question that I'm trying to get an answer for is the existence of these users :-) > >>  3. Both routed/route6d are largely unmaintained [4] and presents an additional attack vector. Here is the list of last non-trivial commits to routed/route6d: > > Whats unmaintained about code that has no need to change cause it just pretty much works? Yep, and then you get SA 14:21 or SA 20:12. > >>  sbin/routed: >>  r327276 - coverity >>  r317035 - rtsock fix >>  r299825 - coverity >>  r299822 - coverity, from netbsd >>  r299821 - coverity, from netbsd >>  r299784 - coverity, from netbsd >>  r299771 - coverify, from netbsd >>  r286347 - bugfix >>  r276602 - SA14:21 patch >>  r271919 - SA14:21 fix >>  r215702 - logic fix, 2010 >> >>  usr.sbin/route6d: >>  r337500 - functional fix, 2018 >>  r317035 - rtsock fix >>  r311994 - coverity >>  r311985 - coverity >>  r299869 - coverity >>  r299491 - coverity >>  r270234 - link-local fix >>  r243233 - functionality improvement, 2012 >> >>  To summarise: RIP protocol is obsolete, implementations for newer protocols exists in ports, implementation in base is unmaintained. >> >>  With all that in mind I propose to remove routed and route6d from base in FreeBSD 13. >>  Timeline: >>  June 5 - feedback aggregation and decision point >>  July 19 - removal (proposed) >> >>  [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Routing_Information_Protocol >>  [2] https://www.globalknowledge.com/ca-en/resources/resource-library/articles/basics-of-understanding-rip/ >>  [3] https://www.networkcomputing.com/data-centers/comparing-dynamic-routing-protocols >>  [4] https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=runnamed&list_id=361897&namedcmd=routed_prs >> >>  /Alexander >>  _______________________________________________ >>  freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list >>  https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net >>  To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > -- > Rod Grimes rgrimes@freebsd.org > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Wed Jun 24 08:44:56 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 719723483B5 for ; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 08:44:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@grem.de) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49sGtJ0wkrz3XY7 for ; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 08:44:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@grem.de) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 1DDFD348483; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 08:44:56 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C775347A4F for ; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 08:44:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@grem.de) Received: from mail.evolve.de (mail.evolve.de [213.239.217.29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.evolve.de", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49sGtG5snxz3XY6 for ; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 08:44:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@grem.de) Received: by mail.evolve.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id dbeeb97e; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 08:44:45 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=grem.de; h=date:from:to:cc :subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=20180501; bh=dETUIBm1 UYYRznYzrnguH/hB2cw=; b=eeEmWZoNGGFLUJqeiFNhfv8tj3FgcAwSbhe6AkC0 YXrQ8DMJpmKcQg38gDgGphDEr0dK3cbONJkiO5vVKDpQaorwhaH5aulT/uTOxHa0 vaDb31LQ6DpAE/hP1sBw4jfEchvZ0xu+f1hp+5VYrKgOHmTwfjIQqwLWTZaOJdez 00/oJNZMj70nMkkDKAfYu8h5aJ7AEGpeBSH2ZVsoGr+g22OdgHgJQ2a+RXBahbAX S6PQw4oMnGS5YLgWTpRcWtuZhU6eN5/32DOGoLQtTOs3tz9RCP+HudkywWnOaBGe iJfkm8SZk3ge6CpaBfynfmdyVmz+BuM1+jqa05TaMiVfqw== DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=grem.de; h=date:from:to:cc :subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=20180501; b=ca SHknRL6evJ4ftFLHJyRch9/8WceDAlzDeltPlmYIlRHqMwS6Te7fLWxgtwG4Au6s +Qfj8Rxoch9o0QxUeuaNhCUAMdb+YPBmCueS/AMDkfjVcKjWblcQdYx6yxDuJNr2 I+KhaptnErqsj29ZkP1nVHpIwY0WTSGqByH+ePubjvaFbIW7BS9yqWfzGpK1ulPu fimuvVCZozEDbe+iFtS4xOhhDilWGelqIZrWJ8bbUNpzX0JwqhW3NgwLiZuA7eXV g8/GK/T1jb3Ukujw9ClFJJqvIfpEzi17M0QvWnA49eqgnHZtKJQD24Db1D0WucBR NEBMrWhHdNbsS58xvq/w== Received: by mail.evolve.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 578adcdf (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305:256:NO); Wed, 24 Jun 2020 08:44:42 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2020 10:44:39 +0200 From: Michael Gmelin To: Steffen Nurpmeso Cc: Michael Gmelin , Kostya Berger , Gary Jennejohn , "zeising+freebsd@daemonic.se" , "current@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: =?UTF-8?B?0JIg0L7RgtCy0LXRgiDQvdCwOg==?= Re: ? ????? ??: Re: FYI: forum web site is .. unreadable Message-ID: <20200624104439.62f0a349@bsd64.grem.de> In-Reply-To: <20200623174721.VILrl%steffen@sdaoden.eu> References: <20200622231452.oAI4n%steffen@sdaoden.eu> <20200623084816.71af4250@ernst.home> <1673290029.4164246.1592903106580@mail.yahoo.com> <20200623130733.658b4a40@ernst.home> <20200623144639.8mJH9%steffen@sdaoden.eu> <811812565.4605472.1592924651983@mail.yahoo.com> <20200623153437.m2NtN%steffen@sdaoden.eu> <20200623192523.7c59577d@bsd64.grem.de> <20200623174721.VILrl%steffen@sdaoden.eu> X-Face: $wrgCtfdVw_H9WAY?S&9+/F"!41z'L$uo*WzT8miX?kZ~W~Lr5W7v?j0Sde\mwB&/ypo^}> +a'4xMc^^KroE~+v^&^#[B">soBo1y6(TW6#UZiC]o>C6`ej+i Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAJFBMVEWJBwe5BQDl LASZU0/LTEWEfHbyj0Txi32+sKrp1Mv944X8/fm1rS+cAAAACXBIWXMAAAsTAAAL EwEAmpwYAAAAB3RJTUUH3wESCxwC7OBhbgAAACFpVFh0Q29tbWVudAAAAAAAQ3Jl YXRlZCB3aXRoIFRoZSBHSU1QbbCXAAAAAghJREFUOMu11DFvEzEUAGCfEhBVFzuq AKkLd0O6VrIQsLXVSZXoWE5N1K3DobBBA9fQpRWc8OkWouaIjedWKiyREOKs+3PY fvalCNjgLVHeF7/3bMtBzV8C/VsQ8tecEgCcDgrzjekwKZ7TwsJZd/ywEKwwP+ZM 8P3drTsAwWn2mpWuDDuYiK1bFs6De0KUUFw0tWxm+D4AIhuuvZqtyWYeO7jQ4Aea 7jUqI+ixhQoHex4WshEvSXdood7stlv4oSuFOC4tqGcr0NjEqXgV4mMJO38nld4+ xKNxRDon7khyKVqY7YR4d+Cg0OMrkWXZOM7YDkEfKiilCn1qYv4mighZiynuHHOA Wq9QJq+BIES7lMFUtcikMnkDGHUoncA+uHgrP0ctIEqfwLHzeSo+eUA66AqzwN6n 2ZHJhw6Qh/PoyC/QENyEyC/AyNjq74Bs+3UH0xYwzDUC4B97HgLocg1QLYgDDO1v f3UX9Y307Ew4AHh67YAFFsxEpkXwpXY3eIgMhAAE3R19L919nNnuD2wlPcDE3UeT L2ytEICQib9BXgS2fU8PrD82ToYO1OEmMSnYTjSqSv9wdC0tPYC+rQRQD9ESnldF CyqfmiYW+tlALt8gH2xrMdC/youbjzPXEun+/ReXsMCDyve3dZc09fn2Oas8oXGc Jj6/fOeK5UmSMPmf/jL+GD8BEj0k/Fn6IO4AAAAASUVORK5CYII= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49sGtG5snxz3XY6 X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=grem.de header.s=20180501 header.b=eeEmWZoN; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of freebsd@grem.de designates 213.239.217.29 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=freebsd@grem.de X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.70 / 15.00]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[grem.de:s=20180501]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:213.239.217.29/32]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-0.997]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[freebsd]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[6]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[grem.de:+]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.71)[-0.711]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[grem.de]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.99)[-0.991]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:213.239.192.0/18, country:DE]; FREEMAIL_CC(0.00)[grem.de,yahoo.co.uk,gmail.com,daemonic.se,freebsd.org]; SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS(1.50)[]; SUBJECT_HAS_QUESTION(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2020 08:44:56 -0000 On Tue, 23 Jun 2020 19:47:21 +0200 Steffen Nurpmeso wrote: > ...shortened... > |Data point: I tried on latest Firefox on macOS, no problems there > (but |the resolution isn't as high as yours). > | > |Does it look less broken on different devices/resolutions when using > |"Web Developer" => "Responsive Design Mode"? > > Now, that i never tried, it is a mysterious thing, but when > i enabled it i got a small window inside the normal window, and > then it looked just fine! So i disabled that again, and resized > the browser window as such, and when the window is smaller than > 470 then suddenly the content springs into existence!! > Thanks for this pointer!! Hi, If you have no solution yet, I would test on a fresh set of settings by adding a temporary user (e.g. "fftest"), logging into the desktop environment as that user, starting firefox and see if the page still doesn't render properly. -m -- Michael Gmelin From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Wed Jun 24 09:07:40 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97645348A64 for ; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 09:07:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from melifaro@ipfw.ru) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49sHNX0yBwz3Ymm for ; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 09:07:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from melifaro@ipfw.ru) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 208EC348E2B; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 09:07:40 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2028E348FA4; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 09:07:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from melifaro@ipfw.ru) Received: from forward500j.mail.yandex.net (forward500j.mail.yandex.net [5.45.198.250]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49sHNV4dV2z3YdD; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 09:07:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from melifaro@ipfw.ru) Received: from mxback21j.mail.yandex.net (mxback21j.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:1619::221]) by forward500j.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 6E07411C2840; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 12:07:35 +0300 (MSK) Received: from localhost (localhost [::1]) by mxback21j.mail.yandex.net (mxback/Yandex) with ESMTP id ZsHof0woJf-7YtGCEPv; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 12:07:34 +0300 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ipfw.ru; s=mail; t=1592989654; bh=5DAyeXxF8W/ysn2J0HhgPtFV7QA1SJudcJSlAlpnPGE=; h=Message-Id:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Date:References:To:From; b=u8bJytf/dmhQuURwpC+LSu/ZsgmsO9AhXtMgqRL0QRRUVh2ePs8y1a7ZpU3Y2a/JW 2MT+NRSF0OxvPBZyoqtg+67vwxCiPujmnrqUp3tCehiPNB37i6pwEz1Nve5uCkHHQD dWlnqm+gSejrTEGPf16qA8z17OFnl0hTj9kXoQmo= Received: by sas2-e9d1d6a5422a.qloud-c.yandex.net with HTTP; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 12:07:34 +0300 From: Alexander V. Chernikov Envelope-From: melifaro@ipfw.ru To: Hiroki Sato Cc: "current@freebsd.org" , "net@freebsd.org" , "freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org" In-Reply-To: <20200622.224621.1160033569666141710.hrs@FreeBSD.org> References: <273191592779927@mail.yandex.ru> <20200622.224621.1160033569666141710.hrs@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: routed && route6d removal proposal MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Yamail [ http://yandex.ru ] 5.0 Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2020 10:07:34 +0100 Message-Id: <113821592986861@mail.yandex.ru> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49sHNV4dV2z3YdD X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=ipfw.ru header.s=mail header.b=u8bJytf/; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of melifaro@ipfw.ru designates 5.45.198.250 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=melifaro@ipfw.ru X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.04 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_SOME(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[ipfw.ru:s=mail]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.03)[-1.030]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:5.45.192.0/19:c]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[freebsd.org]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-0.995]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[ipfw.ru:+]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.71)[-0.712]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[melifaro@freebsd.org,melifaro@ipfw.ru]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[5.45.198.250:from]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:13238, ipnet:5.45.192.0/18, country:RU]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[melifaro@freebsd.org,melifaro@ipfw.ru]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[5.45.198.250:from] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2020 09:07:40 -0000 22.06.2020, 14:54, "Hiroki Sato" : > "Alexander V. Chernikov" wrote >   in <273191592779927@mail.yandex.ru>: > > me> Hey, > me> > me> I would like to propose removal of sbin/routed and usr.sbin/route6d. > >  I am still using both of them in production environments because they >  work well at least for my configurations and most of promising >  alternatives are under GPL, not BSDL. That's actually a very good datapoint I certainly missed. > >  Why do we need to rush to remove them? Discussion about whether we There is no rush. In my opinion, popularity&usage of rip is going in one direction, for the reasons stated in the original e-mail. At some point in time it's worth checking the reality and verify whether we still need it in base or not. I stated 2 week timeframe (though I admit I wrongly written Jun instead of July) for collecting feedback to base a decision upon. It looks like there is enough feedback already. >  should keep or remove such old bits tends to be controversial when >  there is a user like me. I would agree with the removal if they were >  harmful or impossible to maintain, but would not for the reason that >  they are simply old and probably no one uses it today. Reason 1 and >  2 look like the latter at least to me. "too old to be worth keeping" >  is a matter of degree. Uucp, rlogind, and timed should be removed >  (and were removed) because there are few non-FreeBSD platforms which >  support these protocols. RIP is still widely supported---just like >  FTP, which nowadays no one prefers to use and major www browsers are >  about to drop the support of---and not be considered an inherently >  vulnerable protocol like telnet. And keeping these daemons is not >  harmful even for users who want to use third-party routing daemons >  you listed. My concern is hidden housekeeping costs. You have to update the documentation, where it exists. There are some bugs and you have to do something there. There are security vulns or Coverity reports. when you do a change, you have to verify it somehow and you have to tests, so you have to spend more time. Each of it is a small thing by itself, but they add up and drain developer time. > > me> 1.1. Nowadays the daemon name is simply misleading. Given situation > me> described above, one does expect far wider functionality from the > me> program named "route[6]d" than just RIP implementation. > >  I do not think this is a good reason to remove something nor people >  have got confused actually. If this is true, quagga or bird are much >  worse. > > me> 2. Multiple routing stacks supporting all major routing protocol > me> including RIP exists these days: bird, frr, quagga. Many BGP-only > me> designs in are gaining popularity, so do bgp speakers such as exabgp > me> or gobgp. Nowadays, if one needs dynamic routing on the host, OSPF or > me> BGP speaker is the choice. FreeBSD packages contains well-maintained > me> ports for these. Having RIP[ng] speakers in base offers no advantage. > me> > me> 3. Both routed/route6d are largely unmaintained [4] and presents an > me> additional attack vector. Here is the list of last non-trivial commits > me> to routed/route6d: > >  I think this is a separate issue. What attack vectors which are >  known to be vulnerable do they have? I'm referring to the cases like SA 14:21 or SA 20:12. > >  The small commit counts are not equal to its unreliability. Older >  daemons such as ppp(8), dhclient(8), ftpd(8), or bootpd(8) have >  received few substantial changes in recent years because they are >  mature. Well, I see another alternative reason, but that's another discussion :-) Also, dhclient got 50 commits in the last 4 years, so I wouldn't put it in this list. > >  I am not a strong protester and will be happy to keep them as ports >  if everyone wants to remove them and it will happen, but I would like >  consistent criteria on removing software in the base system (they do >  not need to be perfect nor strict, though). I believe harmfulness is My criteria (briefly) is the "moral" staleness, existence of the viable alternatives and no users. I should have stated the latter more explicitly. >  more important than the fact that it is old or we have more choices >  in the ports tree. If we have negative factors on maintaining them, >  removing them would be one of the choices as a result. If the >  existing routed/route6d makes difficulty on people who want to use >  third-party routing daemons, it should be fixed. These kind of >  harmfulness look below the threshold to me at this moment though I >  may be biased because I am still using them today... > > -- Hiroki From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Wed Jun 24 14:59:47 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF2FB350A7D for ; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 14:59:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steffen@sdaoden.eu) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49sRBq3skxz4FH1 for ; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 14:59:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steffen@sdaoden.eu) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 84BD2350D0D; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 14:59:47 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 847F7350A7C for ; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 14:59:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steffen@sdaoden.eu) Received: from sdaoden.eu (sdaoden.eu [217.144.132.164]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49sRBp4M2Mz4FDS for ; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 14:59:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steffen@sdaoden.eu) Received: by sdaoden.eu (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3C73C1605B; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 16:50:34 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2020 16:50:33 +0200 From: Steffen Nurpmeso To: Michael Gmelin Cc: Kostya Berger , Gary Jennejohn , "zeising+freebsd@daemonic.se" , "current@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: =?utf-8?B?0JI=?= =?utf-8?B?INC+0YLQstC10YI=?= =?utf-8?B?INC90LA6?= Re: ? ????? ??: Re: FYI: forum web site is .. unreadable Message-ID: <20200624145033.FoxpG%steffen@sdaoden.eu> In-Reply-To: <20200624104439.62f0a349@bsd64.grem.de> References: <20200622231452.oAI4n%steffen@sdaoden.eu> <20200623084816.71af4250@ernst.home> <1673290029.4164246.1592903106580@mail.yahoo.com> <20200623130733.658b4a40@ernst.home> <20200623144639.8mJH9%steffen@sdaoden.eu> <811812565.4605472.1592924651983@mail.yahoo.com> <20200623153437.m2NtN%steffen@sdaoden.eu> <20200623192523.7c59577d@bsd64.grem.de> <20200623174721.VILrl%steffen@sdaoden.eu> <20200624104439.62f0a349@bsd64.grem.de> Mail-Followup-To: Michael Gmelin , Kostya Berger , Gary Jennejohn , "zeising+freebsd@daemonic.se" , "current@freebsd.org" User-Agent: s-nail v14.9.19-60-g74aff022 OpenPGP: id=EE19E1C1F2F7054F8D3954D8308964B51883A0DD; url=https://ftp.sdaoden.eu/steffen.asc; preference=signencrypt BlahBlahBlah: Any stupid boy can crush a beetle. But all the professors in the world can make no bugs. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49sRBp4M2Mz4FDS X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of steffen@sdaoden.eu designates 217.144.132.164 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=steffen@sdaoden.eu X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.42 / 15.00]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_SOME(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.99)[-0.987]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+a]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.92)[-0.916]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[freebsd]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[sdaoden.eu]; RCPT_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.71)[-0.713]; MID_CONTAINS_FROM(1.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_ZERO(0.00)[0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15987, ipnet:217.144.128.0/20, country:DE]; FREEMAIL_CC(0.00)[yahoo.co.uk,gmail.com,daemonic.se,freebsd.org]; SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS(1.50)[]; SUBJECT_HAS_QUESTION(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2020 14:59:47 -0000 Hello. Michael Gmelin wrote in <20200624104439.62f0a349@bsd64.grem.de>: |On Tue, 23 Jun 2020 19:47:21 +0200 |Steffen Nurpmeso wrote: |> ...shortened... |>|Data point: I tried on latest Firefox on macOS, no problems there |> (but |the resolution isn't as high as yours). |>| |>|Does it look less broken on different devices/resolutions when using |>|"Web Developer" => "Responsive Design Mode"? |> |> Now, that i never tried, it is a mysterious thing, but when |> i enabled it i got a small window inside the normal window, and |> then it looked just fine! So i disabled that again, and resized |> the browser window as such, and when the window is smaller than |> 470 then suddenly the content springs into existence!! |> Thanks for this pointer!! | |If you have no solution yet, I would test on a fresh set of settings |by adding a temporary user (e.g. "fftest"), logging into the desktop |environment as that user, starting firefox and see if the page still |doesn't render properly. Hm, i see no changes. Actually i would like to unregister the user again, i just thought it would help to get me going, but it seems unregistering is not an option. Changing theme, which was a suggestion, does not work here, too. But thanks again, now i know how to deal with that bug :) Ciao, --steffen | |Der Kragenbaer, The moon bear, |der holt sich munter he cheerfully and one by one |einen nach dem anderen runter wa.ks himself off |(By Robert Gernhardt) From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Wed Jun 24 16:35:49 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D48D6352672 for ; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 16:35:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsd-lists@BSDforge.com) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49sTKd4W8Tz4Mms for ; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 16:35:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsd-lists@BSDforge.com) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 99228352848; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 16:35:49 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98C47352A53; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 16:35:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsd-lists@BSDforge.com) Received: from udns.ultimatedns.net (static-24-113-41-81.wavecable.com [24.113.41.81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "ultimatedns.net", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49sTKd1Y0Xz4Mgq; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 16:35:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsd-lists@BSDforge.com) Received: from udns.ultimatedns.net (localhost [IPv6:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:1]) by udns.ultimatedns.net (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 05OGa8DH047122 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 24 Jun 2020 09:36:14 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bsd-lists@BSDforge.com) X-Mailer: Cypht MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: "current@freebsd.org" , "net@freebsd.org" , "freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org" In-Reply-To: <113821592986861@mail.yandex.ru> From: Chris Reply-To: bsd-lists@BSDforge.com To: "Alexander V. Chernikov" , "Rodney W. Grimes" , Hiroki Sato Subject: Re: routed && route6d removal proposal Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2020 09:36:14 -0700 Message-Id: <4dfcc0c99086b023a1508e5a7f60a0af@udns.ultimatedns.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49sTKd1Y0Xz4Mgq X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.00 / 15.00]; ASN(0.00)[asn:11404, ipnet:24.113.0.0/16, country:US]; local_wl_ip(0.00)[24.113.41.81] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2020 16:35:49 -0000 On Wed, 24 Jun 2020 10:07:34 +0100 Alexander V=2E Chernikov melifaro@freebsd=2E= org said > 22=2E06=2E2020, 14:54, "Hiroki Sato" : > > "Alexander V=2E Chernikov" wrote > > =C2=A0=C2=A0in <273191592779927@mail=2Eyandex=2Eru>: > > > > me> Hey, > > me> > > me> I would like to propose removal of sbin/routed and usr=2Esbin/route6d= =2E Please don't=2E > > > > =C2=A0I am still using both of them in production environments because = they > > =C2=A0work well at least for my configurations and most of promising > > =C2=A0alternatives are under GPL, not BSDL=2E +1 on this=2E I began using this around FreeBSD 6, and continued using it through 9=2E I also chose this as a solution for several of my clients=2E I use it because it's "cheap" -- simple, lightweight, and dependable=2E With near zero maintenance -- and it's already available in $BASE=2E While fairly utilitaria= n by today's standards=2E Sometimes you just need to get the job done, and this does just that=2E Which IMHO makes this a shinning star=2E Please don't remove this=2E It's going to make the lives of others a little more difficult=2E Thanks for taking time time to read=2E > That's actually a very good datapoint I certainly missed=2E > > > > =C2=A0Why do we need to rush to remove them? Discussion about whether w= e > There is no rush=2E In my opinion, popularity&usage of rip is going in one > direction, for the reasons stated in the original e-mail=2E > At some point in time it's worth checking the reality and verify whether = we > still need it in base or not=2E > I stated 2 week timeframe (though I admit I wrongly written Jun instead o= f > July) for collecting feedback to base a decision upon=2E > It looks like there is enough feedback already=2E > > =C2=A0should keep or remove such old bits tends to be controversial whe= n > > =C2=A0there is a user like me=2E I would agree with the removal if they w= ere > > =C2=A0harmful or impossible to maintain, but would not for the reason t= hat > > =C2=A0they are simply old and probably no one uses it today=2E Reason 1 a= nd > > =C2=A02 look like the latter at least to me=2E "too old to be worth keepi= ng" > > =C2=A0is a matter of degree=2E Uucp, rlogind, and timed should be removed > > =C2=A0(and were removed) because there are few non-FreeBSD platforms wh= ich > > =C2=A0support these protocols=2E RIP is still widely supported---just lik= e > > =C2=A0FTP, which nowadays no one prefers to use and major www browsers = are > > =C2=A0about to drop the support of---and not be considered an inherentl= y > > =C2=A0vulnerable protocol like telnet=2E And keeping these daemons is not > > =C2=A0harmful even for users who want to use third-party routing daemon= s > > =C2=A0you listed=2E > My concern is hidden housekeeping costs=2E You have to update the > documentation, where > it exists=2E There are some bugs and you have to do something there=2E There = are > security vulns or Coverity reports=2E > when you do a change, you have to verify it somehow and you have to tests= , > so you have to spend more time=2E > Each of it is a small thing by itself, but they add up and drain develope= r > time=2E >=20 > > > > me> 1=2E1=2E Nowadays the daemon name is simply misleading=2E Given situation > > me> described above, one does expect far wider functionality from the > > me> program named "route[6]d" than just RIP implementation=2E > > > > =C2=A0I do not think this is a good reason to remove something nor peop= le > > =C2=A0have got confused actually=2E If this is true, quagga or bird are m= uch > > =C2=A0worse=2E > > > > me> 2=2E Multiple routing stacks supporting all major routing protocol > > me> including RIP exists these days: bird, frr, quagga=2E Many BGP-only > > me> designs in are gaining popularity, so do bgp speakers such as exabg= p > > me> or gobgp=2E Nowadays, if one needs dynamic routing on the host, OSPF = or > > me> BGP speaker is the choice=2E FreeBSD packages contains well-maintaine= d > > me> ports for these=2E Having RIP[ng] speakers in base offers no advantag= e=2E > > me> > > me> 3=2E Both routed/route6d are largely unmaintained [4] and presents an > > me> additional attack vector=2E Here is the list of last non-trivial comm= its > > me> to routed/route6d: > > > > =C2=A0I think this is a separate issue=2E What attack vectors which are > > =C2=A0known to be vulnerable do they have? > I'm referring to the cases like SA 14:21 or SA 20:12=2E > > > > =C2=A0The small commit counts are not equal to its unreliability=2E Older > > =C2=A0daemons such as ppp(8), dhclient(8), ftpd(8), or bootpd(8) have > > =C2=A0received few substantial changes in recent years because they are > > =C2=A0mature=2E > Well, I see another alternative reason, but that's another discussion :-) > Also, dhclient got 50 commits in the last 4 years, so I wouldn't put it i= n > this list=2E > > > > =C2=A0I am not a strong protester and will be happy to keep them as por= ts > > =C2=A0if everyone wants to remove them and it will happen, but I would = like > > =C2=A0consistent criteria on removing software in the base system (they= do > > =C2=A0not need to be perfect nor strict, though)=2E I believe harmfulness= is > My criteria (briefly) is the "moral" staleness, existence of the viable > alternatives and no users=2E > I should have stated the latter more explicitly=2E > > =C2=A0more important than the fact that it is old or we have more choic= es > > =C2=A0in the ports tree=2E If we have negative factors on maintaining the= m, > > =C2=A0removing them would be one of the choices as a result=2E If the > > =C2=A0existing routed/route6d makes difficulty on people who want to us= e > > =C2=A0third-party routing daemons, it should be fixed=2E These kind of > > =C2=A0harmfulness look below the threshold to me at this moment though = I > > =C2=A0may be biased because I am still using them today=2E=2E=2E > > > > -- Hiroki --Chris From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Thu Jun 25 15:45:29 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 630DE35DD80 for ; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 15:45:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from grahamperrin@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wm1-x343.google.com (mail-wm1-x343.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::343]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49t494687Fz4Dk4 for ; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 15:45:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from grahamperrin@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wm1-x343.google.com with SMTP id l2so4951971wmf.0 for ; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 08:45:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=to:from:subject:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=sUnCfZFKZN3u4kzqf987KzxSnw21raDAI2flmg5Negc=; b=EY81JJx4HLv56YwWovptevFfYxpVefcB0A9MN01a4BSyFxRLnIZanCEnyG3bYzN5ta q7RA6PlX9b1VLO5AYoBpKela8fGKxQ4AN8FK5CNFUOh0Sc4j6AEDvsZO44lcV8oXwNt4 hXEsDun5z3c6FvJ/Lvf05/WySK5b/YhNhxUHxDALiKm/vjDBi/nDvIH8L2Qd2imFOZLz fEGXgV0GnvyyzVVtyabZIROo6vqHCDr4JFYitsdLobmK/Tm34e6nqlKd6yQN/IHVNi4b QdswKF+xWd2sTOEw2wLfJL+k6PlYnr9+k5tbMgnfVAuwPLFyC0CF/7NtWVshZJNx3B1T VeuQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:to:from:subject:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=sUnCfZFKZN3u4kzqf987KzxSnw21raDAI2flmg5Negc=; b=qFWiV25oBkZrJmT0vjYOBdFYWuwjULMgYBkygSdutFiODPnSDvKpAqx4iuAszrkUjM L/lY8cL8yTd+sFocKRCDFtllg7CECGDaXJyBN4zaJ+YxTSTFbhYmkxZiWGMqofQtPIhL XvMcN8I/rsGk7cj6jZdNVuihppWYCesIKZVA4p1D058qKPzBnc7b2lQ8pr49SL+lG+G/ bRfNvUCdZ40vKlx3Nj5KSiGbvpPsQXoIThuyivdZJdprs8fSFKr290c+okwNqmLVzPnH K4HnELY1v9bjl/gr81X9UfP0G6Nvy8nx2tmOJVTn8Msbzxg4ECG1MdKxtuqLadEAoUSB fgxQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532A3EEfa+ts6jl216TFliRyYlykyFGmlE6YNSwtIgjLytKspAtK MEsZYzNL01rJ0YYZ2XzmM08X7YDv+9s= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJywBXvwgrmn/VQ6QciVBHsg8wSq4577/VLY1p886H2FAJG1dFLWoKxjt8SQjxz+d9h2leCBOQ== X-Received: by 2002:a7b:cb11:: with SMTP id u17mr3998659wmj.84.1593099926734; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 08:45:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.7] (79-66-147-78.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com. [79.66.147.78]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u20sm12455557wmc.44.2020.06.25.08.45.25 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 25 Jun 2020 08:45:25 -0700 (PDT) To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org From: Graham Perrin Subject: Hardware acceleration lost (?) following pkg upgrade Message-ID: <0f2c1ce1-90e3-6c5a-502d-b6006c05960c@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2020 16:45:24 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49t494687Fz4Dk4 X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=EY81JJx4; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of grahamperrin@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4864:20::343 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=grahamperrin@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.20 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a00:1450:4000::/36:c]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.24)[-0.239]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[79.66.147.78:received]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; SUBJECT_HAS_QUESTION(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2a00:1450::/32, country:US]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.96)[-0.957]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com:dkim]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-current@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2a00:1450:4864:20::343:from]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2020 15:45:29 -0000 For me, all recent attempts to upgrade lead to plasmashell using excessive CPU and frequently crashing. Discussion in IRC led to an observation that I'm apparently without hardware acceleration after these upgrades. For example (GL_RENDERER   = Software Rasterizer): grahamperrin@momh167-gjp4-8570p:~ % date ; uname -v Wed 24 Jun 2020 11:13:00 BST FreeBSD 13.0-CURRENT #58 r361769: Thu Jun  4 09:45:38 BST 2020 root@momh167-gjp4-8570p:/usr/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/sys/GENERIC-NODEBUG grahamperrin@momh167-gjp4-8570p:~ % glxgears -info GL_RENDERER   = Software Rasterizer GL_VERSION    = 2.1 Mesa 19.0.8 GL_VENDOR     = Mesa Project GL_EXTENSIONS = GL_ARB_multisample GL_EXT_abgr GL_EXT_bgra GL_EXT_blend_color GL_EXT_blend_minmax GL_EXT_blend_subtract GL_EXT_copy_texture GL_EXT_subtexture GL_EXT_texture_object GL_EXT_vertex_array GL_EXT_compiled_vertex_array GL_EXT_texture GL_EXT_texture3D GL_IBM_rasterpos_clip GL_ARB_point_parameters GL_EXT_draw_range_elements GL_EXT_packed_pixels GL_EXT_point_parameters GL_EXT_rescale_normal GL_EXT_separate_specular_color GL_EXT_texture_edge_clamp GL_SGIS_generate_mipmap GL_SGIS_texture_border_clamp GL_SGIS_texture_edge_clamp GL_SGIS_texture_lod GL_ARB_multitexture GL_IBM_multimode_draw_arrays GL_IBM_texture_mirrored_repeat GL_3DFX_texture_compression_FXT1 GL_ARB_texture_cube_map GL_ARB_texture_env_add GL_ARB_transpose_matrix GL_EXT_blend_func_separate GL_EXT_fog_coord GL_EXT_multi_draw_arrays GL_EXT_secondary_color GL_EXT_texture_env_add GL_EXT_texture_filter_anisotropic GL_EXT_texture_lod_bias GL_INGR_blend_func_separate GL_NV_blend_square GL_NV_light_max_exponent GL_NV_texgen_reflection GL_NV_texture_env_combine4 GL_S3_s3tc GL_SUN_multi_draw_arrays GL_ARB_texture_border_clamp GL_ARB_texture_compression GL_EXT_framebuffer_object GL_EXT_texture_compression_s3tc GL_EXT_texture_env_combine GL_EXT_texture_env_dot3 GL_MESA_window_pos GL_NV_packed_depth_stencil GL_NV_texture_rectangle GL_ARB_depth_texture GL_ARB_occlusion_query GL_ARB_shadow GL_ARB_texture_env_combine GL_ARB_texture_env_crossbar GL_ARB_texture_env_dot3 GL_ARB_texture_mirrored_repeat GL_ARB_window_pos GL_ATI_fragment_shader GL_EXT_stencil_two_side GL_EXT_texture_cube_map GL_NV_depth_clamp GL_NV_point_sprite GL_APPLE_packed_pixels GL_ARB_draw_buffers GL_ARB_fragment_program GL_ARB_fragment_shader GL_ARB_shader_objects GL_ARB_vertex_program GL_ARB_vertex_shader GL_ATI_draw_buffers GL_ATI_texture_env_combine3 GL_ATI_texture_float GL_EXT_depth_bounds_test GL_EXT_shadow_funcs GL_EXT_stencil_wrap GL_MESA_pack_invert GL_MESA_ycbcr_texture GL_ARB_depth_clamp GL_ARB_fragment_program_shadow GL_ARB_half_float_pixel GL_ARB_occlusion_query2 GL_ARB_point_sprite GL_ARB_shading_language_100 GL_ARB_sync GL_ARB_texture_non_power_of_two GL_ARB_vertex_buffer_object GL_ATI_blend_equation_separate GL_EXT_blend_equation_separate GL_OES_read_format GL_ARB_pixel_buffer_object GL_ARB_texture_compression_rgtc GL_ARB_texture_float GL_ARB_texture_rectangle GL_ATI_texture_compression_3dc GL_EXT_pixel_buffer_object GL_EXT_texture_compression_dxt1 GL_EXT_texture_compression_rgtc GL_EXT_texture_mirror_clamp GL_EXT_texture_rectangle GL_EXT_texture_sRGB GL_EXT_texture_shared_exponent GL_ARB_framebuffer_object GL_EXT_framebuffer_blit GL_EXT_packed_depth_stencil GL_APPLE_object_purgeable GL_ARB_vertex_array_object GL_ATI_separate_stencil GL_ATI_texture_mirror_once GL_EXT_draw_buffers2 GL_EXT_draw_instanced GL_EXT_gpu_program_parameters GL_EXT_texture_array GL_EXT_texture_compression_latc GL_EXT_texture_sRGB_decode GL_ARB_copy_buffer GL_ARB_draw_instanced GL_ARB_half_float_vertex GL_ARB_map_buffer_range GL_ARB_texture_rg GL_ARB_texture_swizzle GL_ARB_vertex_array_bgra GL_EXT_texture_swizzle GL_EXT_vertex_array_bgra GL_NV_conditional_render GL_ARB_debug_output GL_ARB_draw_elements_base_vertex GL_ARB_explicit_attrib_location GL_ARB_fragment_coord_conventions GL_ARB_provoking_vertex GL_ARB_sampler_objects GL_EXT_provoking_vertex GL_ARB_get_program_binary GL_ARB_robustness GL_ARB_separate_shader_objects GL_ARB_texture_compression_bptc GL_ANGLE_texture_compression_dxt3 GL_ANGLE_texture_compression_dxt5 GL_ARB_compressed_texture_pixel_storage GL_ARB_map_buffer_alignment GL_ARB_texture_storage GL_AMD_shader_trinary_minmax GL_ARB_clear_buffer_object GL_ARB_invalidate_subdata GL_ARB_program_interface_query GL_ARB_vertex_attrib_binding GL_KHR_debug GL_ARB_multi_bind GL_ARB_texture_mirror_clamp_to_edge GL_ARB_get_texture_sub_image GL_KHR_context_flush_control GL_KHR_no_error GL_ARB_texture_filter_anisotropic VisualID 289, 0x121 1454 frames in 5.0 seconds = 290.590 FPS 1056 frames in 5.0 seconds = 211.197 FPS X connection to :0 broken (explicit kill or server shutdown). grahamperrin@momh167-gjp4-8570p:~ % /var/log/Xorg.0.log from 21st June in IRC: https://pastebin.com/grYJNQez ---- After reverting to a non-bugged boot environment: grahamperrin@momh167-gjp4-8570p:~ % date ; uname -v Wed 24 Jun 2020 11:25:27 BST FreeBSD 13.0-CURRENT #58 r361769: Thu Jun  4 09:45:38 BST 2020 root@momh167-gjp4-8570p:/usr/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/sys/GENERIC-NODEBUG grahamperrin@momh167-gjp4-8570p:~ % glxgears -info GL_RENDERER   = llvmpipe (LLVM 8.0, 256 bits) GL_VERSION    = 3.1 Mesa 19.0.8 GL_VENDOR     = VMware, Inc. GL_EXTENSIONS = GL_ARB_multisample GL_EXT_abgr GL_EXT_bgra GL_EXT_blend_color GL_EXT_blend_minmax GL_EXT_blend_subtract GL_EXT_copy_texture GL_EXT_subtexture GL_EXT_texture_object GL_EXT_vertex_array GL_EXT_compiled_vertex_array GL_EXT_texture GL_EXT_texture3D GL_IBM_rasterpos_clip GL_ARB_point_parameters GL_EXT_draw_range_elements GL_EXT_packed_pixels GL_EXT_point_parameters GL_EXT_rescale_normal GL_EXT_separate_specular_color GL_EXT_texture_edge_clamp GL_SGIS_generate_mipmap GL_SGIS_texture_border_clamp GL_SGIS_texture_edge_clamp GL_SGIS_texture_lod GL_ARB_framebuffer_sRGB GL_ARB_multitexture GL_EXT_framebuffer_sRGB GL_IBM_multimode_draw_arrays GL_IBM_texture_mirrored_repeat GL_ARB_texture_cube_map GL_ARB_texture_env_add GL_ARB_transpose_matrix GL_EXT_blend_func_separate GL_EXT_fog_coord GL_EXT_multi_draw_arrays GL_EXT_secondary_color GL_EXT_texture_env_add GL_EXT_texture_lod_bias GL_INGR_blend_func_separate GL_NV_blend_square GL_NV_light_max_exponent GL_NV_texgen_reflection GL_NV_texture_env_combine4 GL_S3_s3tc GL_SUN_multi_draw_arrays GL_ARB_texture_border_clamp GL_ARB_texture_compression GL_EXT_framebuffer_object GL_EXT_texture_compression_s3tc GL_EXT_texture_env_combine GL_EXT_texture_env_dot3 GL_MESA_window_pos GL_NV_packed_depth_stencil GL_NV_texture_rectangle GL_ARB_depth_texture GL_ARB_occlusion_query GL_ARB_shadow GL_ARB_texture_env_combine GL_ARB_texture_env_crossbar GL_ARB_texture_env_dot3 GL_ARB_texture_mirrored_repeat GL_ARB_window_pos GL_ATI_fragment_shader GL_EXT_stencil_two_side GL_EXT_texture_cube_map GL_NV_depth_clamp GL_NV_fog_distance GL_APPLE_packed_pixels GL_ARB_draw_buffers GL_ARB_fragment_program GL_ARB_fragment_shader GL_ARB_shader_objects GL_ARB_vertex_program GL_ARB_vertex_shader GL_ATI_draw_buffers GL_ATI_texture_env_combine3 GL_ATI_texture_float GL_EXT_shadow_funcs GL_EXT_stencil_wrap GL_MESA_pack_invert GL_MESA_ycbcr_texture GL_NV_primitive_restart GL_ARB_depth_clamp GL_ARB_fragment_program_shadow GL_ARB_half_float_pixel GL_ARB_occlusion_query2 GL_ARB_point_sprite GL_ARB_shading_language_100 GL_ARB_sync GL_ARB_texture_non_power_of_two GL_ARB_vertex_buffer_object GL_ATI_blend_equation_separate GL_EXT_blend_equation_separate GL_OES_read_format GL_ARB_color_buffer_float GL_ARB_pixel_buffer_object GL_ARB_texture_compression_rgtc GL_ARB_texture_float GL_ARB_texture_rectangle GL_ATI_texture_compression_3dc GL_EXT_packed_float GL_EXT_pixel_buffer_object GL_EXT_texture_compression_dxt1 GL_EXT_texture_compression_rgtc GL_EXT_texture_mirror_clamp GL_EXT_texture_rectangle GL_EXT_texture_sRGB GL_EXT_texture_shared_exponent GL_ARB_framebuffer_object GL_EXT_framebuffer_blit GL_EXT_framebuffer_multisample GL_EXT_packed_depth_stencil GL_ARB_vertex_array_object GL_ATI_separate_stencil GL_ATI_texture_mirror_once GL_EXT_draw_buffers2 GL_EXT_draw_instanced GL_EXT_gpu_program_parameters GL_EXT_texture_array GL_EXT_texture_compression_latc GL_EXT_texture_integer GL_EXT_texture_sRGB_decode GL_EXT_timer_query GL_OES_EGL_image GL_AMD_texture_texture4 GL_ARB_copy_buffer GL_ARB_depth_buffer_float GL_ARB_draw_instanced GL_ARB_half_float_vertex GL_ARB_instanced_arrays GL_ARB_map_buffer_range GL_ARB_texture_buffer_object GL_ARB_texture_rg GL_ARB_texture_swizzle GL_ARB_vertex_array_bgra GL_EXT_texture_swizzle GL_EXT_vertex_array_bgra GL_NV_conditional_render GL_AMD_conservative_depth GL_AMD_draw_buffers_blend GL_AMD_seamless_cubemap_per_texture GL_AMD_shader_stencil_export GL_ARB_ES2_compatibility GL_ARB_blend_func_extended GL_ARB_compatibility GL_ARB_debug_output GL_ARB_draw_buffers_blend GL_ARB_draw_elements_base_vertex GL_ARB_explicit_attrib_location GL_ARB_fragment_coord_conventions GL_ARB_provoking_vertex GL_ARB_sampler_objects GL_ARB_seamless_cube_map GL_ARB_shader_stencil_export GL_ARB_shader_texture_lod GL_ARB_texture_buffer_object_rgb32 GL_ARB_texture_cube_map_array GL_ARB_texture_gather GL_ARB_texture_multisample GL_ARB_texture_query_lod GL_ARB_texture_rgb10_a2ui GL_ARB_uniform_buffer_object GL_ARB_vertex_type_2_10_10_10_rev GL_EXT_provoking_vertex GL_EXT_texture_snorm GL_MESA_texture_signed_rgba GL_ARB_draw_indirect GL_ARB_get_program_binary GL_ARB_robustness GL_ARB_separate_shader_objects GL_ARB_shader_bit_encoding GL_ARB_shader_subroutine GL_ARB_texture_compression_bptc GL_ARB_timer_query GL_ARB_transform_feedback2 GL_ARB_transform_feedback3 GL_ARB_viewport_array GL_AMD_multi_draw_indirect GL_ANGLE_texture_compression_dxt3 GL_ANGLE_texture_compression_dxt5 GL_ARB_base_instance GL_ARB_compressed_texture_pixel_storage GL_ARB_conservative_depth GL_ARB_internalformat_query GL_ARB_map_buffer_alignment GL_ARB_shading_language_420pack GL_ARB_shading_language_packing GL_ARB_texture_storage GL_ARB_transform_feedback_instanced GL_EXT_framebuffer_multisample_blit_scaled GL_EXT_transform_feedback GL_AMD_shader_trinary_minmax GL_ARB_ES3_compatibility GL_ARB_arrays_of_arrays GL_ARB_clear_buffer_object GL_ARB_copy_image GL_ARB_explicit_uniform_location GL_ARB_fragment_layer_viewport GL_ARB_invalidate_subdata GL_ARB_multi_draw_indirect GL_ARB_program_interface_query GL_ARB_stencil_texturing GL_ARB_texture_buffer_range GL_ARB_texture_query_levels GL_ARB_texture_storage_multisample GL_ARB_texture_view GL_ARB_vertex_attrib_binding GL_KHR_debug GL_KHR_texture_compression_astc_ldr GL_ARB_buffer_storage GL_ARB_clear_texture GL_ARB_enhanced_layouts GL_ARB_internalformat_query2 GL_ARB_multi_bind GL_ARB_seamless_cubemap_per_texture GL_ARB_texture_mirror_clamp_to_edge GL_ARB_texture_stencil8 GL_ARB_vertex_type_10f_11f_11f_rev GL_EXT_shader_integer_mix GL_ARB_clip_control GL_ARB_conditional_render_inverted GL_ARB_cull_distance GL_ARB_direct_state_access GL_ARB_get_texture_sub_image GL_ARB_pipeline_statistics_query GL_ARB_transform_feedback_overflow_query GL_EXT_polygon_offset_clamp GL_KHR_context_flush_control GL_KHR_no_error GL_KHR_texture_compression_astc_sliced_3d GL_MESA_shader_integer_functions GL_ARB_polygon_offset_clamp VisualID 800, 0x320 6454 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1290.682 FPS 8886 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1777.002 FPS 8847 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1769.343 FPS X connection to :0 broken (explicit kill or server shutdown). grahamperrin@momh167-gjp4-8570p:~ % ---- HP EliteBook 8570p, Thames [Radeon HD 7550M/7570M/7650M] Any suggestions? TIA From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Sat Jun 27 01:56:58 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B51CD365A62; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 01:56:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from neel@neelc.org) Received: from rainpuddle.neelc.org (rainpuddle.neelc.org [IPv6:2001:19f0:8001:fed:5400:2ff:fe73:c622]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49txh93JQfz487G; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 01:56:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from neel@neelc.org) Received: from mail.neelc.org (rainpuddle.neelc.org [IPv6:2001:19f0:8001:fed:5400:2ff:fe73:c622]) by rainpuddle.neelc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 668EEEB298; Fri, 26 Jun 2020 18:56:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=neelc.org; s=mail; t=1593223006; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding; bh=q4UMQZN+nIWQKdNZg2nsmUBvZGoEw0OXF9Tp/MCkcZw=; b=eLYiQjPyV3A5tId7YZyR4JJZFTmE4Q1Eu38FX4s5wifAEx5NprbR/gDrxQnx44UGroxlRM L4vZRxfTiWWkEdTkXBsdUduE3dEksYR+RW6xZaDPVeiGNhhDVf7DxP1ZBodSBAUiu702d8 fkWURzTwjdvcdomx6nnw4JIuuvvmXIFSTe51DJS7J+LZ3cf/T2/Q/08jgDffg1PMw8lxoV kpFUP9RdIOfPTpbw+F5yzdSQPksNJADPo/7WlcopbICD7sJVrlOMO09as18C4u3vGp2YdO grYVKflsvZdFmfTABsR63QTAWiv7PXc62NUWb5PMSmzAuwww/S9oQYzM0GBPew== MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2020 18:56:44 -0700 From: Neel Chauhan To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Cc: mmacy@freebsd.org, bsdimp@freebsd.org Subject: r362666 breaking buildworld (don't know how to make nvpair.c) & Fix/Patch User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.4.2 Message-ID: X-Sender: neel@neelc.org X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49txh93JQfz487G X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=neelc.org header.s=mail header.b=eLYiQjPy; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=neelc.org; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of neel@neelc.org designates 2001:19f0:8001:fed:5400:2ff:fe73:c622 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=neel@neelc.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.16 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[neelc.org:s=mail]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.997]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+a]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.98)[-0.981]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[neelc.org:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[neelc.org,none]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.29)[-0.287]; RCVD_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:20473, ipnet:2001:19f0:8000::/38, country:US]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; ONCE_RECEIVED(0.10)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2020 01:56:58 -0000 Hi, When I attempt to build world in 13-CURRENT, I get this error: ===> lib/libnv (obj,includes,all,install) [Creating objdir /usr/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/tmp/obj-tools/lib/libnv...] make[3]: make[3]: don't know how to make nvpair.c. Stop make[3]: stopped in /usr/src/lib/libnv *** [legacy] Error code 2 make[2]: stopped in /usr/src 1 error make[2]: stopped in /usr/src *** [_legacy] Error code 2 make[1]: stopped in /usr/src 1 error make[1]: stopped in /usr/src *** [buildworld] Error code 2 make: stopped in /usr/src 1 error make: stopped in /usr/src root@omen:/usr/src # The build broke with mmacy@'s commit r362666 which renamed nvpair.c to bsd_nvpair.c without renaming the Makefile. Is anyone else having this error? I have a patch to unbreak the build here: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D25481 Does the patch work? Best, Neel Chauhan From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Sat Jun 27 03:00:37 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32043340314; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 03:00:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yaneurabeya@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pl1-x635.google.com (mail-pl1-x635.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::635]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49tz5c32jHz4CfQ; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 03:00:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yaneurabeya@gmail.com) Received: by mail-pl1-x635.google.com with SMTP id d12so5000212ply.1; Fri, 26 Jun 2020 20:00:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=/ztT5HOfSigSjbJfW6AagrjxtxUENznc3JOfAkcgHOk=; b=ZQJkFNO3H3HpJrjxMxV75ZsgN9WkaQ2NGIKmzEKQUmYALYK68EdbCnGIHnEDKHVTeg i7vZCEFhZR2oyx5BqTWD4/ahxdGKV5TcpJSlSLhkQkvDmSA/40N8jTDuSnn0aZ3Ki9hZ m6FodV5oQILn3Rn4tCqnYAViv7fxZNH7uKwkb4Thy8I75GKd4tsS+N//CA8DolQZtOO6 vtUOceA6+iCQvRmxJr9IIb4aetdwHAQ3sHO4VwGCnLSIVotSEbeMzzo3DkA9cympZ57j +sY8GRTQIJMgzDuRj/f/ZInr0gunugjGOeNRKm/6CDG0MMG3UPmhdsWFYkhOhZJDXylv +AWw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=/ztT5HOfSigSjbJfW6AagrjxtxUENznc3JOfAkcgHOk=; b=FxQ2fPomC3V9k7hd8t6dQJH90IeoRq921ZK9x6Z+G5ChMkwNRZak+bitCDKIlxtAvt IcUHaGkcn67QxvvjNsZjgJU4CNicuoH1SvnNsoAYlDkWsvD0DincXRvvg9v9KK8qOu4r RJPpvofcoXrjry8uQrFJxV5I7Z5rkoPHplL6DLnVQ8/pRHClK3lWZHoKmyPgalGBZgd+ vaHcdHk27GTx9XXbjHTbU+T3KphjPB9LhEGI95BrHKH5bcBuSX7qvKEZUrO7JP14fDdO Ur5zN7Pw5GUrz+r6NoBz7Xtp1SIt4TMKl1NjxpR4WrUn+TnGA5ZqjCbRHqj1lXYfhWHO kZBw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533yCavbJBTnbXemyWu6KHvylnXmxdzHarC0yu/v+zvg5/Mh59Z+ ZEmEDQMYS8Qh/ydSgBfOyGmAaQiUT6Q= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzdCg9fGZbriQ0KlxNpwxQ0Pd9Oo4nzh3gj7rxoUcxuwsBtwhrB5Sz2ITKomhD7SYQSOSgtkA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:488:: with SMTP id bh8mr3564065pjb.49.1593226834867; Fri, 26 Jun 2020 20:00:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.20.26] (c-73-19-52-228.hsd1.wa.comcast.net. [73.19.52.228]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id gp4sm12298391pjb.26.2020.06.26.20.00.34 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 26 Jun 2020 20:00:34 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.80.23.2.2\)) Subject: Re: r362666 breaking buildworld (don't know how to make nvpair.c) & Fix/Patch From: Enji Cooper In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2020 20:00:33 -0700 Cc: freebsd-current , mmacy@freebsd.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: To: Neel Chauhan X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.23.2.2) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49tz5c32jHz4CfQ X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=ZQJkFNO3; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of yaneurabeya@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::635 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=yaneurabeya@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.09 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36:c]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.63)[-0.625]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[73.19.52.228:received]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com:dkim]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.95)[-0.954]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; FORGED_RECIPIENTS(2.00)[freebsd-current@freebsd.org ..,freebsd-current@freebsd.org ...]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.01)[-1.011]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::635:from]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2020 03:00:37 -0000 (Moving hackers to BCC since the issue is current-related) > On Jun 26, 2020, at 6:56 PM, Neel Chauhan wrote: >=20 > Hi, >=20 > When I attempt to build world in 13-CURRENT, I get this error: =E2=80=A6 > The build broke with mmacy@'s commit r362666 which renamed nvpair.c to = bsd_nvpair.c without renaming the Makefile. ... Hi Neel, It looks like the issue was recently fixed in r362669 by mmacy. Cheers! -Enji= From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Sat Jun 27 04:20:29 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15401341C34 for ; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 04:20:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mmacy@freebsd.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::24b:4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49v0sm5xDVz4HnD for ; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 04:20:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mmacy@freebsd.org) Received: from mail-lj1-f173.google.com (mail-lj1-f173.google.com [209.85.208.173]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) (Authenticated sender: mmacy) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BDC951D1C4 for ; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 04:20:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mmacy@freebsd.org) Received: by mail-lj1-f173.google.com with SMTP id h19so12342723ljg.13 for ; Fri, 26 Jun 2020 21:20:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531we50TpsiTKhMwRZLVy7JMwayIxX21jE3gzoFWJgtx2mOyVnNf EHeHH2sWAejrAB1E2SPwHoaRcXcDDGLb7safhUM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy/l/cRFHamr0l9rW3J+Z61tkH0cGENsBhrfqwPigByW1rewdOpwA/TZOiyI88YdQYxag8BYcJ7OVVbRsY5L/4= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:b0f9:: with SMTP id h25mr3034572ljl.18.1593231627180; Fri, 26 Jun 2020 21:20:27 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Matthew Macy Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2020 21:20:15 -0700 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: r362666 breaking buildworld (don't know how to make nvpair.c) & Fix/Patch To: Enji Cooper Cc: Neel Chauhan , freebsd-current Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2020 04:20:29 -0000 Well - it was from his review. On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 8:00 PM Enji Cooper wrote: > > (Moving hackers to BCC since the issue is current-related) > > > On Jun 26, 2020, at 6:56 PM, Neel Chauhan wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > When I attempt to build world in 13-CURRENT, I get this error: > > =E2=80=A6 > > > The build broke with mmacy@'s commit r362666 which renamed nvpair.c to = bsd_nvpair.c without renaming the Makefile. > > ... > > Hi Neel, > It looks like the issue was recently fixed in r362669 by mmacy. > Cheers! > -Enji From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Sat Jun 27 05:09:37 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77B85342DAC for ; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 05:09:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from neel@neelc.org) Received: from rainpuddle.neelc.org (rainpuddle.neelc.org [66.42.69.219]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49v1yS14qXz4LnM; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 05:09:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from neel@neelc.org) Received: from mail.neelc.org (rainpuddle.neelc.org [IPv6:2001:19f0:8001:fed:5400:2ff:fe73:c622]) by rainpuddle.neelc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C2435EB494; Fri, 26 Jun 2020 22:09:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=neelc.org; s=mail; t=1593234568; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=tYY8ErvuVSq8bQPPMFF6UUI+RPB45MzbUna/7IvLCM4=; b=i7Zx291pKeGAnpChvLzNd2hky+T1a89HqJp8tuWhuOsWkh18LbNBc8wLMBs2A2LijqsDDn T78UBjreO+Li59s4oCwmYoyG/XS2cP+3ncBUYtfitPO1zCTXaOZ7r1RLk8TcpCmVMpxA3o C7PblcFufCGPlKUhmBnueWaQ876Wu+wWnF6LveFDrejKcdGCI3gv1pHoQ4VqjHssRv8qPT cQGwe4nkwu0Fgp2kRlJO/TJwMP+9m0jNLQBy1WpP2ezp3Lz0q9mst0oiExfoUerY7FqWis DMD4TN7Os6lDBP4PbjL9OEoscrSWQqH7DzBIay27ulaQIh0YQzE1HPCjTnv/RA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2020 22:09:28 -0700 From: Neel Chauhan To: Matthew Macy Cc: Enji Cooper , freebsd-current Subject: Re: r362666 breaking buildworld (don't know how to make nvpair.c) & Fix/Patch In-Reply-To: References: User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.4.2 Message-ID: X-Sender: neel@neelc.org X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49v1yS14qXz4LnM X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=neelc.org header.s=mail header.b=i7Zx291p; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=neelc.org; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of neel@neelc.org designates 66.42.69.219 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=neel@neelc.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.21 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[neelc.org:s=mail]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+a]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.99)[-0.993]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.94)[-0.939]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[neelc.org:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[neelc.org,none]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.28)[-0.279]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:20473, ipnet:66.42.64.0/20, country:US]; FREEMAIL_CC(0.00)[gmail.com,freebsd.org]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2020 05:09:37 -0000 On 2020-06-26 21:20, Matthew Macy wrote: > Well - it was from his review. That's true. Thanks for committing! -Neel === https://www.neelc.org/ From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Sat Jun 27 07:04:18 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BD27345A51 for ; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 07:04:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohartmann@walstatt.org) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.22]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mout.gmx.net", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass Class 2 CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49v4Vm5KJ6z4R9j for ; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 07:04:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohartmann@walstatt.org) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1593241454; bh=TI620Hxk6l/FAS4czJP7z2RaiQ2VhIY/4FUQpu8ixrk=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Date:From:To:Subject; b=QtUmfLrunNqYTpUEb49dlOuMImM51EdGSStPaMrtbXc9yvWqi0IyCVft8DaScpSLt UCzTxP0sK23/WA9nLNEo0wvxuWAsvlO7KeJnlyQ6/8NS/LPbNgcm9dySEc9apcVsLg W4CP71Ox/n395kW2mjfedWe/WDGhI6jaf7r3IYj4= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Received: from hermann.fritz.box ([78.54.112.6]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx104 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MOiHf-1jTpuD1nm3-00Q7yr for ; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 09:04:14 +0200 Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2020 09:04:06 +0200 From: "Hartmann, O." To: FreeBSD CURRENT Subject: weird Ctrl-T debug messages Message-ID: <20200627090406.68b5d637@hermann.fritz.box> Organization: walstatt.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; boundary="Sig_/o2831tUQkfCHzl3MNTPmBUt"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:1yzADv81MIkbb8o84kNA5f7p7XVSynn2yJByriluljp+YktOM0l C5fVfVja6XU+jObvtvccMeK4Igvx5py3aNTjocFCUTKExpn3DHfReL7014dBxheZh7FuX0U D7OHELQhOlumLGGAUH4w+xrEO1hpE3AgiXBlmmasfFjKmjjugmg6h4PQu3RdNssiesw3O6Y id1pvpZp6kSpY7k6pFD2A== X-Spam-Flag: NO X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:80hdep1IJ+s=:ok7ZyxcZJHgHF15qIYG5R1 jPbzOKVyqe71BQSfDMJ7UGGqY18He3FzxQvBgcFRC5Avn6gMvSFt010vypn250j4p59KW77d2 aK2QNi2n5cuGraNCfBpsuHpd4enuNyY2dFWojSI8Mo0hVM3O6Fuj7tEk0Prb3pqjhy8/oK6Cu UpHHlYIahH1mEAvxvEaBznRebzz7qf1bLJJ2E6C+d/TJgAgLb1tGd0lsROSn13ZnvYOUOIXEj 0QyZxxK7uo14IbIfdNuXnAK43W/9KEFXzEsl3g4804gMNdEZ90WSAQ3g86S5SFJdcx8RRwQla cYthCVe98dLxoxIFzp08dBizS7ZkPbmjWdO1L47ETgTKcoXIgKiXQdBrrhlK/AYTmdIJk7de4 3BqY7zhK3nYQqEzcTD0vkFJOwkmPVec1Dlqv52OX+R33kCZfsn4eB6NIfBwZzwb19zzrK8y96 MghYnEwK16DBAOWkVWN4SDeFblvD/FFhsfYnddCZW3B7yYpjX3ATKavIjCrFNWB4ruE7eGKIo w70s6nn4UztIQ9GtRGN6hpq+MpiRpibZt4cYG817KqpiAOxs2AZU8qucugCWQFJ/zKp8LQgnW mKHIIAJmS9kDAPGKAp0mgjZxRtQEOBxIIcBc7mQG7YfDMu2YVTm0C4CQftxhW3Ylufz8h9Npi cWAKXSdT+m7WiiH6vdVBGhC9jZUuOJzKLmlwubO/QNXaQCkpcwl97ekR+vOQxVqJ+EWaV53bd amNu2tyr66UtOJAJjRpdy0n7RucFvrdzd/Kt3oI7zgVoYpaX1qVdecWuJQbGiRshQn11aezNp Iy0nA9bAJhLwdlPsiFGo8D4KiPDoHQC8r2RP4cyAq6XX/faALDavkJpuGQDFKIR0+izDl6+L5 xtRO1N/kW2O2nV8624Mo82hkvT/gmcytsPudwVn9r1swLjeyRjN1lSgUtvGz5syA/n9ytxAfK 8CD2LSooxdcL5kw3VczexqvSZim/CrcpMlQGDR9P1lwMafF8SngSnsWVS/aevBOuBzNLHWkA8 C2ZbimA7JspAVeW/KtUETPlFMrucgobMDLQU6o3IKgBRLBuNK1JQPtR2FGP1zR9oRe1e7xvCG ak8lylteUAkPT9IYcIoGRtR3d/V4RL+VzpXFRFeR867lHRiNNia6scy2j3DogtXHLkmbnk59c 2bPM3k4yAR5U6Y/Y62MK2K7c8pAwwYZKZBTvLHRtBjja5WlNqwmJJjcsoSGixhjwxKkfLPQre C1JekS6+XpLoQ9MWjVWaWLDYyuZRS3s4LgWae2Q== X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49v4Vm5KJ6z4R9j X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmx.net header.s=badeba3b8450 header.b=QtUmfLru; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of ohartmann@walstatt.org has no SPF policy when checking 212.227.17.22) smtp.mailfrom=ohartmann@walstatt.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.33 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmx.net:s=badeba3b8450]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[212.227.17.22:from]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.80)[-0.796]; MIME_GOOD(-0.20)[multipart/signed,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-current@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[walstatt.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; HAS_ORG_HEADER(0.00)[]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[78.54.112.6:received]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.34)[-0.343]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmx.net:+]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.31)[0.309]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; ASN(0.00)[asn:8560, ipnet:212.227.0.0/16, country:DE]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[212.227.17.22:from] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2020 07:04:18 -0000 --Sig_/o2831tUQkfCHzl3MNTPmBUt Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Running poudriere on recent CURRENT with (recent) 12-STABLE and CURRENT jails reveals a weird behaviour recently when hitting Ctrl-T: [...] [13:37:48] [01] [00:00:00] Building databases/sqlitestudio | sqlitestudio-3.2.1.1002 load: 26.95 cmd: sh 99331 [piperd] 49375.18r 0.59u 0.59s 0% 2144k #0 0xffffffff80924ace at mi_switch+0xbe #1 0xffffffff809781d4 at sleepq_catch_signals+0x4a4 #2 0xffffffff80977d19 at sleepq_wait_sig+0x9 #3 0xffffffff809241ad at _sleep+0x1ad #4 0xffffffff8098ae5a at pipe_read+0x43a #5 0xffffffff80987a85 at dofileread+0x85 #6 0xffffffff8098766f at sys_read+0xcf #7 0xffffffff80d70229 at amd64_syscall+0x119 #8 0xffffffff80d47bf0 at fast_syscall_common+0x101 Is this debug fallout from /bin/sh? Kind regards, oh --Sig_/o2831tUQkfCHzl3MNTPmBUt Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEARYIAB0WIQSy8IBxAPDkqVBaTJ44N1ZZPba5RwUCXvbvZgAKCRA4N1ZZPba5 R6gvAP45bH7h9pc94PrPErOg2l3UksBjBRIUQETSVHYZ/sDWkAEAnY1uM4OBLEXx zDZCG2A7m1A9htk+lo7mWXSTO60iDQ8= =NMLV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/o2831tUQkfCHzl3MNTPmBUt-- From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Sat Jun 27 07:44:59 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FD2A346F4B for ; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 07:44:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lwhsu.freebsd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yb1-f177.google.com (mail-yb1-f177.google.com [209.85.219.177]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49v5Pk1KvWz4TRk for ; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 07:44:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lwhsu.freebsd@gmail.com) Received: by mail-yb1-f177.google.com with SMTP id j19so2586156ybj.1 for ; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 00:44:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=H82j67dC07v8kndrh4/9J62+Hf3VGtnszVsdyOc+nPM=; b=dMcXxXND9oLOCEzyRhabRlfL+pWX3kT/UEsXB4zwl9hQ516Zt7h4M80JrGc+ZPHzsk QFVdk0GJq3hk4nIUJ6nMy9St4WVbsgAay+kCiCR8vVVKzgP2vHV4ldgeolNaBMuttn7E veB8oEOh3Ke4u6hbaopMWCVB4HOmpa8CKt+PtMQEo3qgHHW6IsobwFuBaPUX18Ghptcb bqdafyPg/qE4CBADAuPktsAKTitYxUIt6FRUmxnI0aTbIibJ5JCBBb0rPNirbii/rsEt xsOF0dXnSQJjZKDyAjVbm1zZ1Jmoh5lbSW/WE9y5rfFKGL5Oa2FZzXZhB3RuJdIHywqe gPjw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533DIqYNthpFIu7KniNSRb/FyPiSH6Yqw6mUqUxVpUnG+p5PYoMw 2GgCosvhHDpm43/pJNTkXkVQnwskbqk0e6lhnXxB8hil X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwU6hQ7fYJxEg7kVYebVcNixVzTf+P9IRMNwPJrfJInpKi9SrErKmPpcBzbnKm1JMN7xPJ9IQeA+5ERjF05vzs= X-Received: by 2002:a25:d088:: with SMTP id h130mr11397160ybg.451.1593243897102; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 00:44:57 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200627090406.68b5d637@hermann.fritz.box> In-Reply-To: <20200627090406.68b5d637@hermann.fritz.box> From: Li-Wen Hsu Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2020 15:44:45 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: weird Ctrl-T debug messages To: "Hartmann, O." Cc: FreeBSD CURRENT Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49v5Pk1KvWz4TRk X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of lwhsufreebsd@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.177 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=lwhsufreebsd@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.23 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.995]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[lwhsu@freebsd.org,lwhsufreebsd@gmail.com]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:209.85.128.0/17:c]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-current@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[freebsd.org]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.003]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.24)[-0.237]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[209.85.219.177:from]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[lwhsu@freebsd.org,lwhsufreebsd@gmail.com]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[209.85.219.177:from]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:209.85.128.0/17, country:US]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2020 07:44:59 -0000 On Sat, Jun 27, 2020 at 3:04 PM Hartmann, O. wrote: > > Running poudriere on recent CURRENT with (recent) 12-STABLE and CURRENT > jails reveals a weird behaviour recently when hitting Ctrl-T: ... > Is this debug fallout from /bin/sh? It's because kern.tty_info_kstacks is on by default now: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/362141 Li-Wen From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Sat Jun 27 07:45:47 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55844347149 for ; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 07:45:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from greg@unrelenting.technology) Received: from out1.migadu.com (out1.migadu.com [91.121.223.63]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49v5Qf2WlSz4Tm3 for ; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 07:45:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from greg@unrelenting.technology) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2020 07:45:34 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=unrelenting.technology; s=default; t=1593243938; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=V2zqhAXHdBlLKZtGAvWuu6Cyik/1P9Q8ULtxRizQ9EY=; b=hSYbd7/DIkhWV3ivaITkYyvcKB06ALWRxU3YhMdUFTq84wJ4RvECvW9Q22AV1SsAA3WqwQ InIWBy5Uqi1vK3i+Q8RvRrt+07ulOsv6bIn6Ns0gwco4j5AfmX5u0banTHHy0VMNymT5Fo xN6AbuAMGnpPBjgXnDeeleMs1YdSE7Q= X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. From: myfreeweb To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, "Hartmann, O." Subject: Re: weird Ctrl-T debug messages In-Reply-To: <20200627090406.68b5d637@hermann.fritz.box> References: <20200627090406.68b5d637@hermann.fritz.box> Message-ID: <51032BAE-9E11-4818-87E2-431859C2E728@unrelenting.technology> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.10 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49v5Qf2WlSz4Tm3 X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=unrelenting.technology header.s=default header.b=hSYbd7/D; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=unrelenting.technology; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of greg@unrelenting.technology designates 91.121.223.63 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=greg@unrelenting.technology X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.35 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.93)[-0.927]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[unrelenting.technology:s=default]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:91.121.223.63]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[unrelenting.technology:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[unrelenting.technology,none]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.43)[-0.426]; RCVD_COUNT_ZERO(0.00)[0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_VERYGOOD(0.00)[91.121.223.63:from]; ASN(0.00)[asn:16276, ipnet:91.121.0.0/16, country:FR]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2020 07:45:47 -0000 On June 27, 2020 7:04:06 AM UTC, "Hartmann, O=2E" wrote: >Running poudriere on recent CURRENT with (recent) 12-STABLE and CURRENT >jails reveals a weird behaviour recently when hitting Ctrl-T: > >[=2E=2E=2E] > >[13:37:48] [01] [00:00:00] Building databases/sqlitestudio | >sqlitestudio-3=2E2=2E1=2E1002 load: 26=2E95 cmd: sh 99331 [piperd] 49375= =2E18r >0=2E59u 0=2E59s 0% 2144k #0 0xffffffff80924ace at mi_switch+0xbe >#1 0xffffffff809781d4 at sleepq_catch_signals+0x4a4 >#2 0xffffffff80977d19 at sleepq_wait_sig+0x9 >#3 0xffffffff809241ad at _sleep+0x1ad >#4 0xffffffff8098ae5a at pipe_read+0x43a >#5 0xffffffff80987a85 at dofileread+0x85 >#6 0xffffffff8098766f at sys_read+0xcf >#7 0xffffffff80d70229 at amd64_syscall+0x119 >#8 0xffffffff80d47bf0 at fast_syscall_common+0x101 > >Is this debug fallout from /bin/sh? Haha, no (how would /bin/sh affect all programs?) It's kern=2Etty_info_kstacks now being on by default in current=2E It's ve= ry useful (not when running poudriere, but when investigating hanging progr= ams) and I probably wouldn't have ever discovered it without the commit mak= ing it default=2E From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Sat Jun 27 09:06:22 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5837A3493FE for ; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 09:06:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from agapon@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lf1-f51.google.com (mail-lf1-f51.google.com [209.85.167.51]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49v7Cd2Q3jz4YjP; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 09:06:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from agapon@gmail.com) Received: by mail-lf1-f51.google.com with SMTP id k15so6390102lfc.4; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 02:06:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:openpgp:autocrypt :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=tnlQSgecAyg+prDh3j21q8Cuw1RJLG8P2XnYJHmcMKU=; b=tmEQJp5gUsLQrDIl/uOb3okEARjTFsYj2zLWdbJ18u8AeiscouLgxCaiXVcuWm9XtZ rvI36v97PA/BItzJ7TncvQS00Tzc4dYBeS22eg7jnCwgpgOppXQ6HWSBxHYIBrzzp4wl Fb/ER/t63BsAhvHIoqkB2zWLRLe4w1ySiVFeiud3EAZ0ebsxXxKyFONCQ49S1moaBd8A 41lM/ZuHXtxpMizkPZdhP8Addvux57CgNmbwIeIbYMvDuPAKihj3SeIcFV9QOkYQafn6 tBb121xYli2ml91nqvTGZt/NHP6Pgtv7z49jz2FoIL4k6//O75NlQ14+tmDTvJWHfxyA c0tQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531rCAx1tKzMs6VfaNCs5GPf9I/50v3HgFMMakZm56jxMTd8Kmc7 VbBdufJF/2aw08OcNdZB2YpCiDlg3Lo= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzzLjNogotO5+oQPiv3cEBoQw1Ojkp71UvzJD7Qraerq7j3s4bkkuDQZ/eEDSLV07c4ll5tYA== X-Received: by 2002:ac2:5e34:: with SMTP id o20mr4103236lfg.5.1593248779148; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 02:06:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.88] (east.meadow.volia.net. [93.72.151.96]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id p14sm7287690lfh.32.2020.06.27.02.06.18 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 27 Jun 2020 02:06:18 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: weird Ctrl-T debug messages To: Li-Wen Hsu , "Conrad E. Meyer" Cc: FreeBSD CURRENT References: <20200627090406.68b5d637@hermann.fritz.box> From: Andriy Gapon Openpgp: preference=signencrypt Autocrypt: addr=avg@FreeBSD.org; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= mQINBFm4LIgBEADNB/3lT7f15UKeQ52xCFQx/GqHkSxEdVyLFZTmY3KyNPQGBtyvVyBfprJ7 mAeXZWfhat6cKNRAGZcL5EmewdQuUfQfBdYmKjbw3a9GFDsDNuhDA2QwFt8BmkiVMRYyvI7l N0eVzszWCUgdc3qqM6qqcgBaqsVmJluwpvwp4ZBXmch5BgDDDb1MPO8AZ2QZfIQmplkj8Y6Z AiNMknkmgaekIINSJX8IzRzKD5WwMsin70psE8dpL/iBsA2cpJGzWMObVTtCxeDKlBCNqM1i gTXta1ukdUT7JgLEFZk9ceYQQMJJtUwzWu1UHfZn0Fs29HTqawfWPSZVbulbrnu5q55R4PlQ /xURkWQUTyDpqUvb4JK371zhepXiXDwrrpnyyZABm3SFLkk2bHlheeKU6Yql4pcmSVym1AS4 dV8y0oHAfdlSCF6tpOPf2+K9nW1CFA8b/tw4oJBTtfZ1kxXOMdyZU5fiG7xb1qDgpQKgHUX8 7Rd2T1UVLVeuhYlXNw2F+a2ucY+cMoqz3LtpksUiBppJhw099gEXehcN2JbUZ2TueJdt1FdS ztnZmsHUXLxrRBtGwqnFL7GSd6snpGIKuuL305iaOGODbb9c7ne1JqBbkw1wh8ci6vvwGlzx rexzimRaBzJxlkjNfMx8WpCvYebGMydNoeEtkWldtjTNVsUAtQARAQABtB5BbmRyaXkgR2Fw b24gPGF2Z0BGcmVlQlNELm9yZz6JAlQEEwEIAD4WIQS+LEO7ngQnXA4Bjr538m7TUc1yjwUC WbgsiAIbIwUJBaOagAULCQgHAgYVCAkKCwIEFgIDAQIeAQIXgAAKCRB38m7TUc1yj+JAEACV l9AK/nOWAt/9cufV2fRj0hdOqB1aCshtSrwHk/exXsDa4/FkmegxXQGY+3GWX3deIyesbVRL rYdtdK0dqJyT1SBqXK1h3/at9rxr9GQA6KWOxTjUFURsU7ok/6SIlm8uLRPNKO+yq0GDjgaO LzN+xykuBA0FlhQAXJnpZLcVfPJdWv7sSHGedL5ln8P8rxR+XnmsA5TUaaPcbhTB+mG+iKFj GghASDSfGqLWFPBlX/fpXikBDZ1gvOr8nyMY9nXhgfXpq3B6QCRYKPy58ChrZ5weeJZ29b7/ QdEO8NFNWHjSD9meiLdWQaqo9Y7uUxN3wySc/YUZxtS0bhAd8zJdNPsJYG8sXgKjeBQMVGuT eCAJFEYJqbwWvIXMfVWop4+O4xB+z2YE3jAbG/9tB/GSnQdVSj3G8MS80iLS58frnt+RSEw/ psahrfh0dh6SFHttE049xYiC+cM8J27Aaf0i9RflyITq57NuJm+AHJoU9SQUkIF0nc6lfA+o JRiyRlHZHKoRQkIg4aiKaZSWjQYRl5Txl0IZUP1dSWMX4s3XTMurC/pnja45dge/4ESOtJ9R 8XuIWg45Oq6MeIWdjKddGhRj3OohsltKgkEU3eLKYtB6qRTQypHHUawCXz88uYt5e3w4V16H lCpSTZV/EVHnNe45FVBlvK7k7HFfDDkryLkCDQRZuCyIARAAlq0slcsVboY/+IUJdcbEiJRW be9HKVz4SUchq0z9MZPX/0dcnvz/gkyYA+OuM78dNS7Mbby5dTvOqfpLJfCuhaNYOhlE0wY+ 1T6Tf1f4c/uA3U/YiadukQ3+6TJuYGAdRZD5EqYFIkreARTVWg87N9g0fT9BEqLw9lJtEGDY EWUE7L++B8o4uu3LQFEYxcrb4K/WKmgtmFcm77s0IKDrfcX4doV92QTIpLiRxcOmCC/OCYuO jB1oaaqXQzZrCutXRK0L5XN1Y1PYjIrEzHMIXmCDlLYnpFkK+itlXwlE2ZQxkfMruCWdQXye syl2fynAe8hvp7Mms9qU2r2K9EcJiR5N1t1C2/kTKNUhcRv7Yd/vwusK7BqJbhlng5ZgRx0m WxdntU/JLEntz3QBsBsWM9Y9wf2V4tLv6/DuDBta781RsCB/UrU2zNuOEkSixlUiHxw1dccI 6CVlaWkkJBxmHX22GdDFrcjvwMNIbbyfQLuBq6IOh8nvu9vuItup7qemDG3Ms6TVwA7BD3j+ 3fGprtyW8Fd/RR2bW2+LWkMrqHffAr6Y6V3h5kd2G9Q8ZWpEJk+LG6Mk3fhZhmCnHhDu6CwN MeUvxXDVO+fqc3JjFm5OxhmfVeJKrbCEUJyM8ESWLoNHLqjywdZga4Q7P12g8DUQ1mRxYg/L HgZY3zfKOqcAEQEAAYkCPAQYAQgAJhYhBL4sQ7ueBCdcDgGOvnfybtNRzXKPBQJZuCyIAhsM BQkFo5qAAAoJEHfybtNRzXKPBVwQAKfFy9P7N3OsLDMB56A4Kf+ZT+d5cIx0Yiaf4n6w7m3i ImHHHk9FIetI4Xe54a2IXh4Bq5UkAGY0667eIs+Z1Ea6I2i27Sdo7DxGwq09Qnm/Y65ADvXs 3aBvokCcm7FsM1wky395m8xUos1681oV5oxgqeRI8/76qy0hD9WR65UW+HQgZRIcIjSel9vR XDaD2HLGPTTGr7u4v00UeTMs6qvPsa2PJagogrKY8RXdFtXvweQFz78NbXhluwix2Tb9ETPk LIpDrtzV73CaE2aqBG/KrboXT2C67BgFtnk7T7Y7iKq4/XvEdDWscz2wws91BOXuMMd4c/c4 OmGW9m3RBLufFrOag1q5yUS9QbFfyqL6dftJP3Zq/xe+mr7sbWbhPVCQFrH3r26mpmy841ym dwQnNcsbIGiBASBSKksOvIDYKa2Wy8htPmWFTEOPRpFXdGQ27awcjjnB42nngyCK5ukZDHi6 w0qK5DNQQCkiweevCIC6wc3p67jl1EMFY5+z+zdTPb3h7LeVnGqW0qBQl99vVFgzLxchKcl0 R/paSFgwqXCZhAKMuUHncJuynDOP7z5LirUeFI8qsBAJi1rXpQoLJTVcW72swZ42IdPiboqx NbTMiNOiE36GqMcTPfKylCbF45JNX4nF9ElM0E+Y8gi4cizJYBRr2FBJgay0b9Cp Message-ID: <14d1708f-74cc-4a60-3282-3308eb24743e@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2020 12:06:17 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/60.0 Thunderbird/60.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49v7Cd2Q3jz4YjP X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of agapon@gmail.com designates 209.85.167.51 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=agapon@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.21 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:209.85.128.0/17:c]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[FreeBSD.org]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.75)[-0.748]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.18)[-0.178]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.29)[-0.285]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[209.85.167.51:from]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[avg@FreeBSD.org,agapon@gmail.com]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[209.85.167.51:from]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:209.85.128.0/17, country:US]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[avg@FreeBSD.org,agapon@gmail.com]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[93.72.151.96:received] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2020 09:06:22 -0000 On 27/06/2020 10:44, Li-Wen Hsu wrote: > On Sat, Jun 27, 2020 at 3:04 PM Hartmann, O. wrote: >> >> Running poudriere on recent CURRENT with (recent) 12-STABLE and CURRENT >> jails reveals a weird behaviour recently when hitting Ctrl-T: > ... >> Is this debug fallout from /bin/sh? > > It's because kern.tty_info_kstacks is on by default now: > > https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/362141 May I suggest that the stack trace is printed procstat -kk style (single line) ? I think that the more compact output would be more convenient. -- Andriy Gapon From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Sat Jun 27 09:59:41 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23FDC34AAC4 for ; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 09:59:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@grem.de) Received: from mail.evolve.de (mail.evolve.de [213.239.217.29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.evolve.de", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49v8P71ZP4z4d9Y; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 09:59:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@grem.de) Received: by mail.evolve.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id b3543668; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 09:59:29 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=grem.de; h=date:from:to:cc :subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=20180501; bh=ow7AwWki tfO56oBUEQexzgVG50A=; b=Pc6np75+6Eta+Ao7S6kbX/DmNF5uFzx9ndTMU+jU 5X/a+mwjebj48q6eo48Ex6wXGSXcJLwuU+hLKBiGF1zWfMjtiIBphOC6e1lSQkfN cBUfnTHDCSSeTrpAxOXtLctgemwqHp6J3ZAJ8h79+D/SKYm6tYsjUDG7LZP23Pjx DfcFxXnHa0XU4ISLTRVExYJ+PPbYgosR0qahKEPhdG4sWu/VMBwV1WprIL3ledYT iMvOJAC9RQczbWFYHUTvpJwDiu0KdeIAWheIrhs6EKBHpjroYjd4D3ZerYqxt4me rwruFpK43Wt+fjhU7J6P2BJ79qYP1ht09iVKdjXtBVQ5UQ== DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=grem.de; h=date:from:to:cc :subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=20180501; b=MG bsywr+aRfwWkrSniSoxirtcNKvuH90ZJVwVeoSFoXPtsZ7q9Ae5PHn4n4MqOQmmA e7glx/XXdPsKcLZSsZMWLwrJWzNv0iT9w2VJ3FqZbSPR6qXAhIh++Vdl3Fmv/Zwd 5dUgxwLWxwl5PQiuoIYdkUSBu3R7Fh1ycNsgsE+KgvefKwAMRj75DjW92vmfQNnU D3rbaLs6WtOzTIEuBDqpiAh3jceGdNYlXve1AA6fdtkntlsdtUjeRxc8KvfrVJuy OVEGewmRJWAKL9K3G6L/uVTjYmtqfJKONTFZ3FP7ZlPuq2DmLqBVzfvFfzgDUEHq ykrvOHH+pXOs8aIH+tLQ== Received: by mail.evolve.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id dba4a0fc (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305:256:NO); Sat, 27 Jun 2020 09:59:26 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2020 11:59:10 +0200 From: Michael Gmelin To: Andriy Gapon Cc: Li-Wen Hsu , "Conrad E. Meyer" , FreeBSD CURRENT Subject: Re: weird Ctrl-T debug messages Message-ID: <20200627115910.4fe32aa6@bsd64.grem.de> In-Reply-To: <14d1708f-74cc-4a60-3282-3308eb24743e@FreeBSD.org> References: <20200627090406.68b5d637@hermann.fritz.box> <14d1708f-74cc-4a60-3282-3308eb24743e@FreeBSD.org> X-Face: $wrgCtfdVw_H9WAY?S&9+/F"!41z'L$uo*WzT8miX?kZ~W~Lr5W7v?j0Sde\mwB&/ypo^}> +a'4xMc^^KroE~+v^&^#[B">soBo1y6(TW6#UZiC]o>C6`ej+i Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAJFBMVEWJBwe5BQDl LASZU0/LTEWEfHbyj0Txi32+sKrp1Mv944X8/fm1rS+cAAAACXBIWXMAAAsTAAAL EwEAmpwYAAAAB3RJTUUH3wESCxwC7OBhbgAAACFpVFh0Q29tbWVudAAAAAAAQ3Jl YXRlZCB3aXRoIFRoZSBHSU1QbbCXAAAAAghJREFUOMu11DFvEzEUAGCfEhBVFzuq AKkLd0O6VrIQsLXVSZXoWE5N1K3DobBBA9fQpRWc8OkWouaIjedWKiyREOKs+3PY fvalCNjgLVHeF7/3bMtBzV8C/VsQ8tecEgCcDgrzjekwKZ7TwsJZd/ywEKwwP+ZM 8P3drTsAwWn2mpWuDDuYiK1bFs6De0KUUFw0tWxm+D4AIhuuvZqtyWYeO7jQ4Aea 7jUqI+ixhQoHex4WshEvSXdood7stlv4oSuFOC4tqGcr0NjEqXgV4mMJO38nld4+ xKNxRDon7khyKVqY7YR4d+Cg0OMrkWXZOM7YDkEfKiilCn1qYv4mighZiynuHHOA Wq9QJq+BIES7lMFUtcikMnkDGHUoncA+uHgrP0ctIEqfwLHzeSo+eUA66AqzwN6n 2ZHJhw6Qh/PoyC/QENyEyC/AyNjq74Bs+3UH0xYwzDUC4B97HgLocg1QLYgDDO1v f3UX9Y307Ew4AHh67YAFFsxEpkXwpXY3eIgMhAAE3R19L919nNnuD2wlPcDE3UeT L2ytEICQib9BXgS2fU8PrD82ToYO1OEmMSnYTjSqSv9wdC0tPYC+rQRQD9ESnldF CyqfmiYW+tlALt8gH2xrMdC/youbjzPXEun+/ReXsMCDyve3dZc09fn2Oas8oXGc Jj6/fOeK5UmSMPmf/jL+GD8BEj0k/Fn6IO4AAAAASUVORK5CYII= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49v8P71ZP4z4d9Y X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=grem.de header.s=20180501 header.b=Pc6np75+; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of freebsd@grem.de designates 213.239.217.29 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=freebsd@grem.de X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.51 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[grem.de:s=20180501]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.93)[-0.930]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:213.239.217.29/32]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[grem.de]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.98)[-0.978]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[grem.de:+]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.10)[-0.103]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:213.239.192.0/18, country:DE]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2020 09:59:41 -0000 On Sat, 27 Jun 2020 12:06:17 +0300 Andriy Gapon wrote: > On 27/06/2020 10:44, Li-Wen Hsu wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 27, 2020 at 3:04 PM Hartmann, O. > > wrote: > >> > >> Running poudriere on recent CURRENT with (recent) 12-STABLE and > >> CURRENT jails reveals a weird behaviour recently when hitting > >> Ctrl-T: > > ... > >> Is this debug fallout from /bin/sh? > > > > It's because kern.tty_info_kstacks is on by default now: > > > > https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/362141 > > May I suggest that the stack trace is printed procstat -kk style > (single line) ? I think that the more compact output would be more > convenient. It's a cool feature and having it on by default on CURRENT certainly helps to discover it, which is great. Thanks for implementing this! I wouldn't enable it by default on RELEASE versions though, as CTRL-T is a user interface to get status information (at least this is how I use it personally, e.g., while running commands like dd[0], cp, mv, poudriere etc.), not for getting debug output. Getting debug information every time I want to get the status seems like something that would make my user experience worse. I understand that this can be disabled locally, but that's a bit like changing the default syslog.conf to write messages of log level LOG_DEBUG to /var/log/messages. So, in the long run (before 13-RELEASE) I would prefer to disable it by default again, but maybe alter the default sysctl.conf to contain: # Uncomment this to show stack traces on SIGINFO (ctrl-t) #kern.tty_info_kstacks=1 Question: Speaking of discovering the feature, wouldn't it make sense to document this tunable on the stack(9) and/or tty(4) man page(s)? Just my 2 cents [0] Typical use case: $ dd if=/dev/random of=/dev/da0 bs=1m load: 0.37 cmd: dd 32247 [running] 0.91r 0.00u 0.88s 8% 2672k 149+0 records in 149+0 records out 156237824 bytes transferred in 0.922956 secs (169279818 bytes/sec) load: 0.42 cmd: dd 32247 [running] 2.52r 0.00u 2.46s 21% 2676k 398+0 records in 398+0 records out 417333248 bytes transferred in 2.528253 secs (165067835 bytes/sec) ... -- Michael Gmelin From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Sat Jun 27 13:21:18 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D78E834FDD5 for ; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 13:21:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [96.47.72.83]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49vDsp5Lghz3bfk; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 13:21:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from John-Baldwins-MacBook-Pro-274.local (unknown [IPv6:2601:648:8203:2990:e845:db94:43a8:84a1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: jhb) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 34D1020CD6; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 13:21:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@FreeBSD.org) Subject: Re: weird Ctrl-T debug messages To: Michael Gmelin , Andriy Gapon Cc: Li-Wen Hsu , "Conrad E. Meyer" , FreeBSD CURRENT References: <20200627090406.68b5d637@hermann.fritz.box> <14d1708f-74cc-4a60-3282-3308eb24743e@FreeBSD.org> <20200627115910.4fe32aa6@bsd64.grem.de> From: John Baldwin Autocrypt: addr=jhb@FreeBSD.org; keydata= mQGiBETQ+XcRBADMFybiq69u+fJRy/0wzqTNS8jFfWaBTs5/OfcV7wWezVmf9sgwn8TW0Dk0 c9MBl0pz+H01dA2ZSGZ5fXlmFIsee1WEzqeJzpiwd/pejPgSzXB9ijbLHZ2/E0jhGBcVy5Yo /Tw5+U/+laeYKu2xb0XPvM0zMNls1ah5OnP9a6Ql6wCgupaoMySb7DXm2LHD1Z9jTsHcAQMD /1jzh2BoHriy/Q2s4KzzjVp/mQO5DSm2z14BvbQRcXU48oAosHA1u3Wrov6LfPY+0U1tG47X 1BGfnQH+rNAaH0livoSBQ0IPI/8WfIW7ub4qV6HYwWKVqkDkqwcpmGNDbz3gfaDht6nsie5Z pcuCcul4M9CW7Md6zzyvktjnbz61BADGDCopfZC4of0Z3Ka0u8Wik6UJOuqShBt1WcFS8ya1 oB4rc4tXfSHyMF63aPUBMxHR5DXeH+EO2edoSwViDMqWk1jTnYza51rbGY+pebLQOVOxAY7k do5Ordl3wklBPMVEPWoZ61SdbcjhHVwaC5zfiskcxj5wwXd2E9qYlBqRg7QeSm9obiBCYWxk d2luIDxqaGJARnJlZUJTRC5vcmc+iGAEExECACAFAkTQ+awCGwMGCwkIBwMCBBUCCAMEFgID AQIeAQIXgAAKCRBy3lIGd+N/BI6RAJ9S97fvbME+3hxzE3JUyUZ6vTewDACdE1stFuSfqMvM jomvZdYxIYyTUpC5Ag0ERND5ghAIAPwsO0B7BL+bz8sLlLoQktGxXwXQfS5cInvL17Dsgnr3 1AKa94j9EnXQyPEj7u0d+LmEe6CGEGDh1OcGFTMVrof2ZzkSy4+FkZwMKJpTiqeaShMh+Goj XlwIMDxyADYvBIg3eN5YdFKaPQpfgSqhT+7El7w+wSZZD8pPQuLAnie5iz9C8iKy4/cMSOrH YUK/tO+Nhw8Jjlw94Ik0T80iEhI2t+XBVjwdfjbq3HrJ0ehqdBwukyeJRYKmbn298KOFQVHO EVbHA4rF/37jzaMadK43FgJ0SAhPPF5l4l89z5oPu0b/+5e2inA3b8J3iGZxywjM+Csq1tqz hltEc7Q+E08AAwUIAL+15XH8bPbjNJdVyg2CMl10JNW2wWg2Q6qdljeaRqeR6zFus7EZTwtX sNzs5bP8y51PSUDJbeiy2RNCNKWFMndM22TZnk3GNG45nQd4OwYK0RZVrikalmJY5Q6m7Z16 4yrZgIXFdKj2t8F+x613/SJW1lIr9/bDp4U9tw0V1g3l2dFtD3p3ZrQ3hpoDtoK70ioIAjjH aIXIAcm3FGZFXy503DOA0KaTWwvOVdYCFLm3zWuSOmrX/GsEc7ovasOWwjPn878qVjbUKWwx Q4QkF4OhUV9zPtf9tDSAZ3x7QSwoKbCoRCZ/xbyTUPyQ1VvNy/mYrBcYlzHodsaqUDjHuW+I SQQYEQIACQUCRND5ggIbDAAKCRBy3lIGd+N/BCO8AJ9j1dWVQWxw/YdTbEyrRKOY8YZNwwCf afMAg8QvmOWnHx3wl8WslCaXaE8= Message-ID: <61989d05-324a-0b8d-d0cf-0da5f3d9f00d@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2020 06:21:17 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200627115910.4fe32aa6@bsd64.grem.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2020 13:21:18 -0000 On 6/27/20 2:59 AM, Michael Gmelin wrote: > > > On Sat, 27 Jun 2020 12:06:17 +0300 > Andriy Gapon wrote: > >> On 27/06/2020 10:44, Li-Wen Hsu wrote: >>> On Sat, Jun 27, 2020 at 3:04 PM Hartmann, O. >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Running poudriere on recent CURRENT with (recent) 12-STABLE and >>>> CURRENT jails reveals a weird behaviour recently when hitting >>>> Ctrl-T: >>> ... >>>> Is this debug fallout from /bin/sh? >>> >>> It's because kern.tty_info_kstacks is on by default now: >>> >>> https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/362141 >> >> May I suggest that the stack trace is printed procstat -kk style >> (single line) ? I think that the more compact output would be more >> convenient. > > It's a cool feature and having it on by default on CURRENT certainly > helps to discover it, which is great. Thanks for implementing this! > > I wouldn't enable it by default on RELEASE versions though, as CTRL-T > is a user interface to get status information (at least this is how I > use it personally, e.g., while running commands like dd[0], cp, mv, > poudriere etc.), not for getting debug output. I agree with this. > Question: Speaking of discovering the feature, wouldn't it make sense > to document this tunable on the stack(9) and/or tty(4) man page(s)? This sounds like a great idea. Would you able to come up with a patch? I'd be happy to review it. -- John Baldwin From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Sat Jun 27 14:28:20 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93BB7351BE1 for ; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 14:28:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from o.hartmann@walstatt.org) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.18]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mout.gmx.net", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass Class 2 CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49vGM71KXTz3y1d; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 14:28:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from o.hartmann@walstatt.org) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1593268096; bh=Mjud+/DrinBbWn1gEHMogssCFlW/yVvGM/sazFvgebE=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=kGDsG7vknzSrNfMh+JYPiEL7h7DuUJXnf9J3uCn3PZVVMrSIl7KonK5Ofgi87Ha71 xjqwhPIhCLH1dZahYJ/wdYKLe6G2AMahm82Jd0T6yhRyew6bjWBjBXQE6LmoRERAEp t35TQpw8IrB8VwOXzD8WD0GKvdvUr/T7qvRIIv5s= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Received: from hermann.fritz.box ([78.54.112.6]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx005 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MEFvj-1jf2oP1rxF-00ADOY; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 16:28:16 +0200 Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2020 16:28:07 +0200 From: "Hartmann, O." To: John Baldwin Cc: Michael Gmelin , Andriy Gapon , Li-Wen Hsu , "Conrad E. Meyer" , FreeBSD CURRENT Subject: Re: weird Ctrl-T debug messages Message-ID: <20200627162807.664d55b7@hermann.fritz.box> In-Reply-To: <61989d05-324a-0b8d-d0cf-0da5f3d9f00d@FreeBSD.org> References: <20200627090406.68b5d637@hermann.fritz.box> <14d1708f-74cc-4a60-3282-3308eb24743e@FreeBSD.org> <20200627115910.4fe32aa6@bsd64.grem.de> <61989d05-324a-0b8d-d0cf-0da5f3d9f00d@FreeBSD.org> Organization: walstatt.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; boundary="Sig_/n0BGpRt3l=cXRZley0NnE7="; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:Qczc3hAj0gXo3fhKKSolqzHkLmynGwxw3Z0DVp/FVP7nVSAxVCv Xsp5Wr7jHIP1QCy5zv5XuaIjLhVfzYOJbM+J5vb5cfLSU2n0nqoklEKlT1VhNjrstNvyItH 877kLkepsCYroZmMJk9UnIDOZMrIO7JmBnppeiGQVX8XtYRxLvn6xhrxNvYJLYYwk1WNLY0 f7RICTKsW0u2KlRnAjCbg== X-Spam-Flag: NO X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:JpRn4JStYyg=:R1OzfBO/Ui/w8GluGnV6/F SGIHjcUS/ofWeOnGnd4Y/pBz9YymuAa5iWGQXIjTZSX4TuzW7XdjRP7zPRWX12UD3Jafwyp81 k2xB8ccKWl76yCokHfW67SELUX9qSWqQ9LPynVyGav+q+0M+T1ofu81pB4ESB14ZgMlMtKlcv DPuCAAuwJ0NOC9Y79DPJlPHVf5FgEOLaL09yPAFVdihEydb2IGyJSlSUfP4L8bDSDLqhwEz+z 0lnAaIloXZnKFcSq1oWcfHvFGUGuDL3qzCeTUj4HKjeDcShER3JeNzPEbCV/nBAD7z9GkzDkz sK5SidjtJNhzo5AgSADrnfq46/8LDmdyh679OyiX6H3z+pOW1mmrAoTyVT07rtOkgRcKqxyyJ ycZzA+doCCYKyonNdIRvAo40sJIsjUY7WeWDSSw93JLN9IadupFYEcEfpouMmUlD/94DMP9ou RCv2mQqfN4faTn3Xr7SCDSuFBlnORMLEDVGnfAvffWVvMc4aFbpql8cnfkDAySazp3Q4EOoh4 wMciJOtAGtGhSCLD23KDAnKOQON05smRekgRgp6lWNsE2VwC9Wp2Xt5FdtXwe608CZvU/07Tz KieiMGylXzmBCuQz9eQJBWPKt547wYD10GkZsz0NRfY5Ucam6LNvZ3jpQDnzkNJgWznxw8OSi 22j7mkuH4rE2hLr/3L+drsnKIk5iRgGw+r1w3ehK+G/e10VJVro8Ra9PcNsKUTuQJZvjDdHrD AWapZiVqEVPO1fTJCPlAeLZy2IRVpOQaoK18MtOGDMK5sjc1tdQdYas4m0pg2r9M9t9CloVoH kZNgGjB2JLTGQ9H+aBg3nwRA5WQZTwHvvQ9ltA4u9zTd27oEQDOXIbD+76Gjh1L7r3MieGHGi 3mAhVK43tvkqYBtBdCqsOppstEv4j3rfRaWdcaqSB8f8xUuehjGpX+d2F+YLht7vQuVD/oSXb 6zsOqDY6XsN6AiQiomyGxtUSnrdQPG3Fb277VqI3HW1o/thi0jrgw7pGUVdIPdT3veowaJAzS vAqhViuYqPwdirlayryyFGjyHXdbboN+fW3op1PAuyjcN8jsghe9Wmmf1SPWhtZAqHlJQGE0J tNXAaJxHK6V/7i3bLlxLODBJTU1w+u75dvYn51W/fUd9HpvmlmNurveqexxARBauIp+GZXgMO mOHhEWdup4zzyY50gohW/GoXBXYdbT/aW4MJxypUO4UKfQKaaFbGd5qihEqY+xtbDhxUQALs2 oedvshjGsb3iCR1n3 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49vGM71KXTz3y1d X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmx.net header.s=badeba3b8450 header.b=kGDsG7vk; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of o.hartmann@walstatt.org has no SPF policy when checking 212.227.15.18) smtp.mailfrom=o.hartmann@walstatt.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.51 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmx.net:s=badeba3b8450]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[212.227.15.18:from]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.77)[-0.773]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.91)[-0.909]; MIME_GOOD(-0.20)[multipart/signed,text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[walstatt.org]; RCPT_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[6]; HAS_ORG_HEADER(0.00)[]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[78.54.112.6:received]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmx.net:+]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.33)[-0.325]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; ASN(0.00)[asn:8560, ipnet:212.227.0.0/16, country:DE]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[212.227.15.18:from] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2020 14:28:20 -0000 --Sig_/n0BGpRt3l=cXRZley0NnE7= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 27 Jun 2020 06:21:17 -0700 John Baldwin wrote: > On 6/27/20 2:59 AM, Michael Gmelin wrote: > >=20 > >=20 > > On Sat, 27 Jun 2020 12:06:17 +0300 > > Andriy Gapon wrote: > > =20 > >> On 27/06/2020 10:44, Li-Wen Hsu wrote: =20 > >>> On Sat, Jun 27, 2020 at 3:04 PM Hartmann, O. > >>> wrote: =20 > >>>> > >>>> Running poudriere on recent CURRENT with (recent) 12-STABLE and > >>>> CURRENT jails reveals a weird behaviour recently when hitting > >>>> Ctrl-T: =20 > >>> ... =20 > >>>> Is this debug fallout from /bin/sh? =20 > >>> > >>> It's because kern.tty_info_kstacks is on by default now: > >>> > >>> https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/362141 =20 > >> > >> May I suggest that the stack trace is printed procstat -kk style > >> (single line) ? I think that the more compact output would be more > >> convenient. =20 > >=20 > > It's a cool feature and having it on by default on CURRENT certainly > > helps to discover it, which is great. Thanks for implementing this! > >=20 > > I wouldn't enable it by default on RELEASE versions though, as > > CTRL-T is a user interface to get status information (at least this > > is how I use it personally, e.g., while running commands like > > dd[0], cp, mv, poudriere etc.), not for getting debug output. =20 >=20 > I agree with this. >=20 > > Question: Speaking of discovering the feature, wouldn't it make > > sense to document this tunable on the stack(9) and/or tty(4) man > > page(s)? =20 >=20 > This sounds like a great idea. Would you able to come up with a > patch? I'd be happy to review it. >=20 Thanks for the explanation. Regards, oh --Sig_/n0BGpRt3l=cXRZley0NnE7= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEARYIAB0WIQSy8IBxAPDkqVBaTJ44N1ZZPba5RwUCXvdXdwAKCRA4N1ZZPba5 RyI3AQCzjF4gB5nYgim/PIQfFqy+RXCCttQmjfRvyfgNcvwVdAEA3528uMNd2wJR IAUn38Yrc9Z/csq7nLph+3OAXp1LIAA= =9WiM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/n0BGpRt3l=cXRZley0NnE7=-- From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Sat Jun 27 14:50:23 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F2D8353228 for ; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 14:50:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@grem.de) Received: from mail.evolve.de (mail.evolve.de [213.239.217.29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.evolve.de", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49vGrW653lz42Fj; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 14:50:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@grem.de) Received: by mail.evolve.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id b1423702; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 14:50:14 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=grem.de; h=date:from:to:cc :subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=20180501; bh=vMgQxQt6 P4bwy4fRHC49oxMm8bg=; b=LUVduTV2hgFsV5om785z8sp3SrfF7M58OxYn/ivE 4snJQdhee9hrlOj1UVkXJvufotCWaw2WW5+9V1wRdifukcaZjOZU3J6mAi97dZhx oh99liNeFrdjwxBQNHmfUJTnRgx5lJ6XBF7bFY4BfOAxSYdjSfI4+ZnlL2+szN/b zRw2FawumDNxlfYK2UUTFBy2ORnakDGct5eD/gfNkZx/m7A+TUSMQb/r6gUVrLqJ /rf+0uzLmg5Xgw+14dZW+e3EgUhEQrWEM7Hfq0wovqUA0uXFOdl/H3dH2R1MOebb tYHF/9U6VvKlaINIDl49qfHLnwyKIiMxwjCeJI2wpmBjGg== DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=grem.de; h=date:from:to:cc :subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=20180501; b=dg csQ+TYrNwLHquA/RVjI0kuVK9xuF3riMkcFsE15aSwzvB3llCSqp64sKV0B51V1X 6iAXC5hEAluyYH5ylVM6WO2GaBVxPlJu3KkgpFkkgu3Gv5XjV8FWedOZQvl7Blsq 6726tZiJTUb0zgwD3I+uKWu7tjxwsPmryk5HJ3FEj0rkPif67h+EoAKVsmZgnJMN T1LfmTCb28TzN2hyQX+BtOpTkPeXY3WwKX5ApO3GCdNws1IIzUbLYIGGMkUV/xbe gwXgKye3bMnNqj5ya/snlIKBL/h543H0kA/mW8cXGSmT0GBQTEb6Ep15n9xDrWfN JdA5ULfRenR25Wb/t7VQ== Received: by mail.evolve.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id b3afe7a8 (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305:256:NO); Sat, 27 Jun 2020 14:50:12 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2020 16:49:59 +0200 From: Michael Gmelin To: John Baldwin Cc: Michael Gmelin , Andriy Gapon , Li-Wen Hsu , "Conrad E. Meyer" , FreeBSD CURRENT Subject: Re: weird Ctrl-T debug messages Message-ID: <20200627164959.15752fb2@bsd64.grem.de> In-Reply-To: <61989d05-324a-0b8d-d0cf-0da5f3d9f00d@FreeBSD.org> References: <20200627090406.68b5d637@hermann.fritz.box> <14d1708f-74cc-4a60-3282-3308eb24743e@FreeBSD.org> <20200627115910.4fe32aa6@bsd64.grem.de> <61989d05-324a-0b8d-d0cf-0da5f3d9f00d@FreeBSD.org> X-Face: $wrgCtfdVw_H9WAY?S&9+/F"!41z'L$uo*WzT8miX?kZ~W~Lr5W7v?j0Sde\mwB&/ypo^}> +a'4xMc^^KroE~+v^&^#[B">soBo1y6(TW6#UZiC]o>C6`ej+i Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAJFBMVEWJBwe5BQDl LASZU0/LTEWEfHbyj0Txi32+sKrp1Mv944X8/fm1rS+cAAAACXBIWXMAAAsTAAAL EwEAmpwYAAAAB3RJTUUH3wESCxwC7OBhbgAAACFpVFh0Q29tbWVudAAAAAAAQ3Jl YXRlZCB3aXRoIFRoZSBHSU1QbbCXAAAAAghJREFUOMu11DFvEzEUAGCfEhBVFzuq AKkLd0O6VrIQsLXVSZXoWE5N1K3DobBBA9fQpRWc8OkWouaIjedWKiyREOKs+3PY fvalCNjgLVHeF7/3bMtBzV8C/VsQ8tecEgCcDgrzjekwKZ7TwsJZd/ywEKwwP+ZM 8P3drTsAwWn2mpWuDDuYiK1bFs6De0KUUFw0tWxm+D4AIhuuvZqtyWYeO7jQ4Aea 7jUqI+ixhQoHex4WshEvSXdood7stlv4oSuFOC4tqGcr0NjEqXgV4mMJO38nld4+ xKNxRDon7khyKVqY7YR4d+Cg0OMrkWXZOM7YDkEfKiilCn1qYv4mighZiynuHHOA Wq9QJq+BIES7lMFUtcikMnkDGHUoncA+uHgrP0ctIEqfwLHzeSo+eUA66AqzwN6n 2ZHJhw6Qh/PoyC/QENyEyC/AyNjq74Bs+3UH0xYwzDUC4B97HgLocg1QLYgDDO1v f3UX9Y307Ew4AHh67YAFFsxEpkXwpXY3eIgMhAAE3R19L919nNnuD2wlPcDE3UeT L2ytEICQib9BXgS2fU8PrD82ToYO1OEmMSnYTjSqSv9wdC0tPYC+rQRQD9ESnldF CyqfmiYW+tlALt8gH2xrMdC/youbjzPXEun+/ReXsMCDyve3dZc09fn2Oas8oXGc Jj6/fOeK5UmSMPmf/jL+GD8BEj0k/Fn6IO4AAAAASUVORK5CYII= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49vGrW653lz42Fj X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=grem.de header.s=20180501 header.b=LUVduTV2; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of freebsd@grem.de designates 213.239.217.29 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=freebsd@grem.de X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.69 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[grem.de:s=20180501]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.996]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:213.239.217.29/32]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.98)[-0.976]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[grem.de]; RCPT_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[6]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[grem.de:+]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.22)[-0.222]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:213.239.192.0/18, country:DE]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2020 14:50:23 -0000 On Sat, 27 Jun 2020 06:21:17 -0700 John Baldwin wrote: > On 6/27/20 2:59 AM, Michael Gmelin wrote: > > > > > > On Sat, 27 Jun 2020 12:06:17 +0300 > > Andriy Gapon wrote: > > > >> On 27/06/2020 10:44, Li-Wen Hsu wrote: > >>> On Sat, Jun 27, 2020 at 3:04 PM Hartmann, O. > >>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Running poudriere on recent CURRENT with (recent) 12-STABLE and > >>>> CURRENT jails reveals a weird behaviour recently when hitting > >>>> Ctrl-T: > >>> ... > >>>> Is this debug fallout from /bin/sh? > >>> > >>> It's because kern.tty_info_kstacks is on by default now: > >>> > >>> https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/362141 > >> > >> May I suggest that the stack trace is printed procstat -kk style > >> (single line) ? I think that the more compact output would be more > >> convenient. > > > > It's a cool feature and having it on by default on CURRENT certainly > > helps to discover it, which is great. Thanks for implementing this! > > > > I wouldn't enable it by default on RELEASE versions though, as > > CTRL-T is a user interface to get status information (at least this > > is how I use it personally, e.g., while running commands like > > dd[0], cp, mv, poudriere etc.), not for getting debug output. > > I agree with this. > > > Question: Speaking of discovering the feature, wouldn't it make > > sense to document this tunable on the stack(9) and/or tty(4) man > > page(s)? > > This sounds like a great idea. Would you able to come up with a > patch? I'd be happy to review it. Sure, it actually seems like that termios(4) is the best place to put this information. https://reviews.freebsd.org/D25488 Best, Michael -- Michael Gmelin From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Sat Jun 27 15:32:16 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15907354479 for ; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 15:32:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wlosh@bsdimp.com) Received: from mail-qt1-x834.google.com (mail-qt1-x834.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::834]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49vHmv1Frfz45DG for ; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 15:32:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wlosh@bsdimp.com) Received: by mail-qt1-x834.google.com with SMTP id j10so9730495qtq.11 for ; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 08:32:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bsdimp-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=yCw2WRO3c7Vdbg73tOzHHZH98N69ksC5ScW9PYDTGl8=; b=RLTSuoDbQR9W/+FOqYRY44XhqMkWJYcqkyefPDWuo3YYtJHmyKZ4+3nPMKIZhN61bt /ogzQnYRw/M/gnPsjY1c9RGT4Wh7a2gyRsHkuzIFegH1WBEvQUWPj/eHrIm27mXoEzi5 ioy5ozHpTAVXk1s6kwlx+dLdCvkwdM10VHc8LvAFsHROUIVW3ZniNl7WuSTtZJu0frD7 J18hGNx2yP7qE57hy2w3qYvX1S5lLiF9hb0arYf4LlBrbstfz7S9Y/ZnBx9TxaZY77aS vo78O6q7C8/ZcliP6wnmJ9tmFLt3s+EdPdv2rS0cm6TvyrkWnyyrHIIPcfxJBd8CUScb BMXw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=yCw2WRO3c7Vdbg73tOzHHZH98N69ksC5ScW9PYDTGl8=; b=AqcJp8QGI8XuxPYwIItKEKQYq2YWldYDL8EY0juTEc8YF6N95Dca5qQgYB8NbjRti6 tkRFG0r39OeUXW8icR/1yBYQ1MJQ8fwAGOMX0mu0KcgDp/KvMlA6reaAXyzY9M6BQzuR J59RUxydWU8p/m2Lle82hAhSVOIW98o0pBUAuvmyO5sjXRHoq18fLYWVMqZguEuTeA4q pXIWCLPI2A4Dcqn2MzIVDP4yoxnBCQjs7w4B/4Dx5U/XXCn3xiWu/C+CSfxCOa27sOdn 3igecBWoPCKuWxx2sjt0+S7VSjynWeW6w0/73BhhFyc2fq0nXhBEF8nV1QSSOiMjw6Lf K95w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530qnMXsoLAIu+ijTcuq9uwWVJhZB6WfRyYZ93ZFWvuu/IEDn6tU y2vSGM03rL7N1AIq2feVXIkCVVTK9+bDVcqzaQgZxg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxhfbXKFq0UOtQUCbY2WsuAUgUhsb6DC+QyxQ7aRGd85ukuJbWuzYGMick6sKpTXVMSCk/cmZ3ENB+gsbLIN4Q= X-Received: by 2002:ac8:34e8:: with SMTP id x37mr8318761qtb.291.1593271934052; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 08:32:14 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200627090406.68b5d637@hermann.fritz.box> <14d1708f-74cc-4a60-3282-3308eb24743e@FreeBSD.org> <20200627115910.4fe32aa6@bsd64.grem.de> <61989d05-324a-0b8d-d0cf-0da5f3d9f00d@FreeBSD.org> <20200627164959.15752fb2@bsd64.grem.de> In-Reply-To: <20200627164959.15752fb2@bsd64.grem.de> From: Warner Losh Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2020 09:32:02 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: weird Ctrl-T debug messages To: Michael Gmelin Cc: John Baldwin , Andriy Gapon , Li-Wen Hsu , "Conrad E. Meyer" , FreeBSD CURRENT X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49vHmv1Frfz45DG X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=bsdimp-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=RLTSuoDb; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of wlosh@bsdimp.com has no SPF policy when checking 2607:f8b0:4864:20::834) smtp.mailfrom=wlosh@bsdimp.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.19 / 15.00]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[bsdimp-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com:s=20150623]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.41)[-0.409]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.67)[-0.666]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-current@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[bsdimp.com]; URI_COUNT_ODD(1.00)[1]; RCPT_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[6]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[bsdimp-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com:+]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.12)[-0.120]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::834:from]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[imp@bsdimp.com,wlosh@bsdimp.com]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[imp@bsdimp.com,wlosh@bsdimp.com] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.33 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2020 15:32:16 -0000 On Sat, Jun 27, 2020 at 8:50 AM Michael Gmelin wrote: > > > On Sat, 27 Jun 2020 06:21:17 -0700 > John Baldwin wrote: > > > On 6/27/20 2:59 AM, Michael Gmelin wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Sat, 27 Jun 2020 12:06:17 +0300 > > > Andriy Gapon wrote: > > > > > >> On 27/06/2020 10:44, Li-Wen Hsu wrote: > > >>> On Sat, Jun 27, 2020 at 3:04 PM Hartmann, O. > > >>> wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>> Running poudriere on recent CURRENT with (recent) 12-STABLE and > > >>>> CURRENT jails reveals a weird behaviour recently when hitting > > >>>> Ctrl-T: > > >>> ... > > >>>> Is this debug fallout from /bin/sh? > > >>> > > >>> It's because kern.tty_info_kstacks is on by default now: > > >>> > > >>> https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/362141 > > >> > > >> May I suggest that the stack trace is printed procstat -kk style > > >> (single line) ? I think that the more compact output would be more > > >> convenient. > > > > > > It's a cool feature and having it on by default on CURRENT certainly > > > helps to discover it, which is great. Thanks for implementing this! > > > > > > I wouldn't enable it by default on RELEASE versions though, as > > > CTRL-T is a user interface to get status information (at least this > > > is how I use it personally, e.g., while running commands like > > > dd[0], cp, mv, poudriere etc.), not for getting debug output. > > > > I agree with this. > > > > > Question: Speaking of discovering the feature, wouldn't it make > > > sense to document this tunable on the stack(9) and/or tty(4) man > > > page(s)? > > > > This sounds like a great idea. Would you able to come up with a > > patch? I'd be happy to review it. > > Sure, it actually seems like that termios(4) is the best > place to put this information. > > https://reviews.freebsd.org/D25488 Damn, when I read this, I thought it was patches to control this on a per-tty basis by putting it in termios... That would be even cooler :) Warner From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Sat Jun 27 22:23:31 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C47735E19B for ; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 22:23:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsd-lists@BSDforge.com) Received: from udns.ultimatedns.net (static-24-113-41-81.wavecable.com [24.113.41.81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "ultimatedns.net", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49vSvQ43p9z4Xrj for ; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 22:23:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsd-lists@BSDforge.com) Received: from udns.ultimatedns.net (localhost [IPv6:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:1]) by udns.ultimatedns.net (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 05RMNNqu037358 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Sat, 27 Jun 2020 15:23:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bsd-lists@BSDforge.com) X-Mailer: Cypht MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: Michael Gmelin In-Reply-To: <20200627115910.4fe32aa6@bsd64.grem.de> From: Chris Reply-To: bsd-lists@BSDforge.com To: FreeBSD CURRENT Subject: Re: weird Ctrl-T debug messages Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2020 15:23:29 -0700 Message-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49vSvQ43p9z4Xrj X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.00 / 15.00]; ASN(0.00)[asn:11404, ipnet:24.113.0.0/16, country:US]; local_wl_ip(0.00)[24.113.41.81] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2020 22:23:31 -0000 On Sat, 27 Jun 2020 11:59:10 +0200 Michael Gmelin freebsd@grem=2Ede said > On Sat, 27 Jun 2020 12:06:17 +0300 > Andriy Gapon wrote: >=20 > > On 27/06/2020 10:44, Li-Wen Hsu wrote: > > > On Sat, Jun 27, 2020 at 3:04 PM Hartmann, O=2E > > > wrote: =20 > > >> > > >> Running poudriere on recent CURRENT with (recent) 12-STABLE and > > >> CURRENT jails reveals a weird behaviour recently when hitting > > >> Ctrl-T: =20 > > > =2E=2E=2E =20 > > >> Is this debug fallout from /bin/sh? =20 > > >=20 > > > It's because kern=2Etty_info_kstacks is on by default now: > > >=20 > > > https://svnweb=2Efreebsd=2Eorg/changeset/base/362141 =20 > >=20 > > May I suggest that the stack trace is printed procstat -kk style > > (single line) ? I think that the more compact output would be more > > convenient=2E >=20 > It's a cool feature and having it on by default on CURRENT certainly > helps to discover it, which is great=2E Thanks for implementing this! >=20 > I wouldn't enable it by default on RELEASE versions though, as CTRL-T > is a user interface to get status information (at least this is how I > use it personally, e=2Eg=2E, while running commands like dd[0], cp, mv, > poudriere etc=2E), not for getting debug output=2E >=20 > Getting debug information every time I want to get the status seems > like something that would make my user experience worse=2E I understand > that this can be disabled locally, but that's a bit like changing > the default syslog=2Econf to write messages of log level LOG_DEBUG > to /var/log/messages=2E >=20 > So, in the long run (before 13-RELEASE) I would prefer to disable it by > default again, but maybe alter the default sysctl=2Econf to contain: >=20 > # Uncomment this to show stack traces on SIGINFO (ctrl-t) > #kern=2Etty_info_kstacks=3D1 >=20 > Question: Speaking of discovering the feature, wouldn't it make sense > to document this tunable on the stack(9) and/or tty(4) man page(s)? >=20 > Just my 2 cents A huge +1 here=2E I think you captured it well, Michael=2E Thanks=2E --Chris >=20 > [0] Typical use case: >=20 > $ dd if=3D/dev/random of=3D/dev/da0 bs=3D1m > > load: 0=2E37 cmd: dd 32247 [running] 0=2E91r 0=2E00u 0=2E88s 8% 2672k > 149+0 records in > 149+0 records out > 156237824 bytes transferred in 0=2E922956 secs (169279818 bytes/sec) > > load: 0=2E42 cmd: dd 32247 [running] 2=2E52r 0=2E00u 2=2E46s 21% 2676k > 398+0 records in > 398+0 records out > 417333248 bytes transferred in 2=2E528253 secs (165067835 bytes/sec) > =2E=2E=2E >=20 > --=20 > Michael Gmelin > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd=2Eorg mailing list > https://lists=2Efreebsd=2Eorg/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd=2Eorg= "