From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sun Jun 21 10:40:15 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04627349D1A for ; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 10:40:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from darcy@druid.net) Received: from mail.vex.net (mail.vex.net [IPv6:2605:2600:1001::44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49qTZk1m0Jz3TlB for ; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 10:40:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from darcy@druid.net) Received: from dilbert.druid.net (unknown [216.105.80.22]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: darcy) by mail.vex.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2B6307F283 for ; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 06:40:05 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: WiFi hotspot keeps dropping To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org References: <07f4e7f5-095e-e89e-2c55-d283ca62149c@druid.net> From: D'Arcy Cain Autocrypt: addr=darcy@druid.net; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= mDMEXu32OxYJKwYBBAHaRw8BAQdAD839OEQVMqCs45KVwLKg4srvl51WsVhMpTGOd9z3Ym20 HUQnQXJjeSBDYWluIDxkYXJjeUBkcnVpZC5uZXQ+iJYEExYIAD4WIQSQJTNYM0vv3aTmBCs/ 5DDweYZnXQUCXu32OwIbAwUJCWYBgAULCQgHAgYVCgkICwIEFgIDAQIeAQIXgAAKCRA/5DDw eYZnXWAxAP9cDL1j4koUFRBNQyC4iMp/cx5KnozmtsFtiTrWdZBrIwD6A2rLFx60tJryd/qp SZpXk7UPDLH/PY1hstjx9WUbXQi4OARe7fY7EgorBgEEAZdVAQUBAQdAbK0SOaTRrkI2QAWz rCz29D2RDOgGTvEbDpyWiyA5RhQDAQgHiH4EGBYIACYWIQSQJTNYM0vv3aTmBCs/5DDweYZn XQUCXu32OwIbDAUJCWYBgAAKCRA/5DDweYZnXaNOAQDC77ymNjoMZQVgDCcmgZEk6IZxn45k nyW17OYCpRctvgD9Fg3aocAbHK7V9AhmSbDPxLNQygQUPjjU7Cyn97b1cQs= Message-ID: Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2020 06:40:04 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="x5xS55xVXKlfk5T53XlAQ8R3jwnpAjTtj" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49qTZk1m0Jz3TlB X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of darcy@druid.net has no SPF policy when checking 2605:2600:1001::44) smtp.mailfrom=darcy@druid.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.37 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.51)[0.510]; MIME_GOOD(-0.20)[multipart/signed,multipart/mixed,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-net@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; HAS_ATTACHMENT(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.49)[0.488]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[druid.net]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.48)[0.475]; SIGNED_PGP(-2.00)[]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; RCVD_NO_TLS_LAST(0.10)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:+,3:~]; ASN(0.00)[asn:19842, ipnet:2605:2600::/32, country:CA]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2020 10:40:15 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --x5xS55xVXKlfk5T53XlAQ8R3jwnpAjTtj Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="8SJzFT5HAGq3ry1RPNZDb8ovpNAxEcJoW" --8SJzFT5HAGq3ry1RPNZDb8ovpNAxEcJoW Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2020-06-19 12:14, Adrian Chadd wrote: > [snip] Also, did you plug in something USB-3 related recently? :-) >=20 > USB-3 / USB-C's signaling frequency interferes with 2.4GHz :-) No. The only USB-C I have is my phone which I have never plugged into th= e computer. Here's another data point. It seems that I don't necessarily have to restart hostapd. If I do "ifconfig wlan0 scan" it comes back as well. --=20 D'Arcy J.M. Cain | Democracy is three wolves http://www.druid.net/darcy/ | and a sheep voting on +1 416 788 2246 (DoD#0082) (eNTP) | what's for dinner. IM: darcy@VybeNetworks.com, VoIP: sip:darcy@druid.net --8SJzFT5HAGq3ry1RPNZDb8ovpNAxEcJoW-- --x5xS55xVXKlfk5T53XlAQ8R3jwnpAjTtj Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEARYIAB0WIQSQJTNYM0vv3aTmBCs/5DDweYZnXQUCXu85BAAKCRA/5DDweYZn Xc2zAQCZj6uPPbYcS2LdLQPuGib6EBDLibNmXi4/nv5hwgnYKAD9FtYVpi13iP1d i2Ll3Otc2jdPc7IYxPFlvCDmaLsPCw0= =RBSe -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --x5xS55xVXKlfk5T53XlAQ8R3jwnpAjTtj-- From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sun Jun 21 18:50:57 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F4E6357D75 for ; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 18:50:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stb@lassitu.de) Received: from gilb.zs64.net (gilb.zs64.net [IPv6:2a00:14b0:4200:32e0::1ea]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "gilb.zs64.net", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49qhSw2Pl6z4RCt for ; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 18:50:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stb@lassitu.de) Received: by gilb.zs64.net (Postfix, from stb@lassitu.de) id ECBE131BBE3 for ; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 18:50:47 +0000 (UTC) From: Stefan Bethke Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.80.23.2.2\)) Subject: SR_IOV with ixgbe not working? Message-Id: <302B863E-9FFB-4641-BDE7-5923214121C7@lassitu.de> Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2020 20:50:46 +0200 To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.23.2.2) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49qhSw2Pl6z4RCt X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of stb@lassitu.de designates 2a00:14b0:4200:32e0::1ea as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=stb@lassitu.de X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.25 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.67)[-0.667]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-net@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.53)[-0.531]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[lassitu.de]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.26)[-0.257]; RCVD_COUNT_ZERO(0.00)[0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; ASN(0.00)[asn:13135, ipnet:2a00:14b0::/32, country:DE]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.33 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2020 18:50:57 -0000 I just started using an ASRock Rack X470D4U2-2T: = https://www.asrockrack.com/general/productdetail.asp?Model=3DX470D4U2-2T#S= pecifications = It sports an X550 dual 10G ethernet controller: # pciconf -lv ix0@pci0:1:0:0: class=3D0x020000 card=3D0x15631849 chip=3D0x15638086 = rev=3D0x01 hdr=3D0x00 vendor =3D 'Intel Corporation' device =3D 'Ethernet Controller 10G X550T' class =3D network subclass =3D ethernet ix1@pci0:1:0:1: class=3D0x020000 card=3D0x15631849 chip=3D0x15638086 = rev=3D0x01 hdr=3D0x00 vendor =3D 'Intel Corporation' device =3D 'Ethernet Controller 10G X550T' class =3D network subclass =3D ethernet It should support SR-IOV: # ls -l /dev/iov =20 total 0 crw------- 1 root wheel 0x32 Jun 20 23:04 ix0 crw------- 1 root wheel 0x33 Jun 20 23:04 ix1 # iovctl -S -d ix1 The following configuration parameters may be configured on the PF: num_vfs : uint16_t (required) device : string (required) The following configuration parameters may be configured on a VF: passthrough : bool (default =3D false) mac-addr : unicast-mac (optional) mac-anti-spoof : bool (default =3D true) allow-set-mac : bool (default =3D false) allow-promisc : bool (default =3D false) If I try to create a number of virtual devices, things don't seem to = work out: # cat /etc/iovctl-ix1.conf=20 PF { device: "ix1"; num_vfs: 8; } DEFAULT { passthrough: true; } VF-0 { passthrough: false; } # iovctl -C -f /etc/iovctl-ix1.conf # dmesg ... ixv0: at device = 0.129 on pci1 ixv0: ...reset_hw() failure: Reset Failed! ixv0: IFDI_ATTACH_PRE failed 5 device_attach: ixv0 attach returned 5 pci1: at device 0.131 (no driver attached) pci1: at device 0.133 (no driver attached) pci1: at device 0.135 (no driver attached) pci1: at device 0.137 (no driver attached) pci1: at device 0.139 (no driver attached) pci1: at device 0.141 (no driver attached) pci1: at device 0.143 (no driver attached) I haven't tried the passthrough devices yet, but I am interested in = having at least one virtual device available in the host for use with a = VIMAGE jail. # uname -a FreeBSD diesel.lassitu.de 12.1-STABLE FreeBSD 12.1-STABLE r362450 = GENERIC amd64 Should this be working? It seems some months ago it was necessary to = compile the Intel driver instead of the in-tree one. I would have = assumed that it would have been integrated by now.=20 Stefan --=20 Stefan Bethke Fon +49 151 14070811 From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sun Jun 21 20:52:27 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BBD533291A for ; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 20:52:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from melifaro@ipfw.ru) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49ql962GJXz4bD0 for ; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 20:52:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from melifaro@ipfw.ru) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id BF9B7332ADD; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 20:52:23 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAB49332B04; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 20:52:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from melifaro@ipfw.ru) Received: from forward500o.mail.yandex.net (forward500o.mail.yandex.net [37.140.190.195]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49ql8z6PWxz4Zlk; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 20:52:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from melifaro@ipfw.ru) Received: from mxback16g.mail.yandex.net (mxback16g.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:1472:2741:0:8b7:316]) by forward500o.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id A83BB60095; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 23:52:15 +0300 (MSK) Received: from localhost (localhost [::1]) by mxback16g.mail.yandex.net (mxback/Yandex) with ESMTP id zan0fZizPg-qFgGgbAE; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 23:52:15 +0300 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ipfw.ru; s=mail; t=1592772735; bh=9xWZRz/fiIIh8psvTGoCgbdo7W/XzmiVFJzv1iJVKfU=; h=Message-Id:Date:Subject:To:From; b=begypto7NfarKx0voVYOBy+TMCqRp6oTA+tm7di+rSSqimX282c44Y1JBV7VUSTjZ OZ/GgpMY1m1VuIvtEi87Bqa3z5QqdaO5p3OLg/+7kHnPgZAcU6YftQDHHWYrMbA7wK w00j6gf6JMEjYug0hE2DFIB2e6kwDl05m1NzPKsM= Received: by sas8-93eeb7dac565.qloud-c.yandex.net with HTTP; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 23:52:14 +0300 From: Alexander V. Chernikov Envelope-From: melifaro@ipfw.ru To: "current@FreeBSD.org" , net , freebsd-hackers Subject: net.inet6.ip6.deembed_scopeid removal X-Mailer: Yamail [ http://yandex.ru ] 5.0 Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2020 21:52:14 +0100 Message-Id: <626011592740709@mail.yandex.ru> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49ql8z6PWxz4Zlk X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=ipfw.ru header.s=mail header.b=begypto7; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of melifaro@ipfw.ru designates 37.140.190.195 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=melifaro@ipfw.ru X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.46 / 15.00]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_SOME(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[ipfw.ru:s=mail]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.02)[-1.016]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.01)[-1.007]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:37.140.128.0/18]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[freebsd.org]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[ipfw.ru:+]; MIME_BASE64_TEXT(0.10)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.54)[-0.535]; MIME_HTML_ONLY(0.20)[]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[melifaro@freebsd.org,melifaro@ipfw.ru]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[37.140.190.195:from]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:~]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:13238, ipnet:37.140.128.0/18, country:RU]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[melifaro@freebsd.org,melifaro@ipfw.ru]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_VERYGOOD(0.00)[37.140.190.195:from] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.33 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2020 20:52:27 -0000 From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sun Jun 21 21:00:46 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC7C33330CE for ; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 21:00:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49qlLk4c6xz4cB2 for ; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 21:00:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 94654333157; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 21:00:46 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BD253331C7 for ; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 21:00:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49qlLk1r9Gz4cGX for ; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 21:00:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 31478232FC for ; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 21:00:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 05LL0k0X086553 for ; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 21:00:46 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from bugzilla@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 05LL0kKv086552 for net@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 21:00:46 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <202006212100.05LL0kKv086552@kenobi.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: bugzilla set sender to bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: Problem reports for net@FreeBSD.org that need special attention Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2020 21:00:46 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.33 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2020 21:00:47 -0000 To view an individual PR, use: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=(Bug Id). The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users, which need special attention. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and obsolete releases. Status | Bug Id | Description ------------+-----------+--------------------------------------------------- In Progress | 221146 | [ixgbe] Problem with second laggport In Progress | 235700 | oce(4) driver causes fatal trap 12 on boot with e New | 204438 | setsockopt() handling of kern.ipc.maxsockbuf limi New | 205592 | TCP processing in IPSec causes kernel panic New | 213410 | [carp] service netif restart causes hang only whe Open | 7556 | ppp: sl_compress_init() will fail if called anyth Open | 187835 | ngctl(8) strange behavior when adding more than 5 Open | 193452 | Dell PowerEdge 210 II -- Kernel panic bce (broadc Open | 194453 | dummynet(4): pipe config bw parameter limited to Open | 200319 | Bridge+CARP crashes/freezes Open | 202510 | [CARP] advertisements sourced from CARP IP cause Open | 207261 | netmap: Doesn't do TX sync with kqueue Open | 210726 | tcp connect() can return invalid EADDRINUSE (Eg: Open | 222273 | igb(4): Kernel panic (fatal trap 12) due to netwo Open | 225438 | panic in6_unlink_ifa() due to race Open | 227720 | Kernel panic in ppp server Open | 230807 | if_alc(4): Driver not working for Killer Networki Open | 235524 | igb(4): Ethernet interface loses active link stat Open | 236888 | ppp daemon: Allow MTU to be overridden for PPPoE Open | 236983 | bnxt(4) VLAN not operational unless explicit "ifc Open | 237072 | netgraph(4): performance issue [on HardenedBSD]? Open | 237840 | Removed dummynet dependency on ipfw Open | 238324 | Add XG-C100C/AQtion AQC107 10GbE NIC driver Open | 240530 | netgraph/ng_source: Allow ng_source to inject int Open | 240944 | em(4): Crash with Intel 82571EB NIC with AMD Pile Open | 240969 | netinet6: Neighbour reachability detection broken Open | 241106 | tun/ppp: panic: vm_fault: fault on nofault entry Open | 241162 | Panic in closefp() triggered by nginx (uwsgi with Open | 243463 | ix0: Watchdog timeout Open | 244066 | divert: Add sysctls for divert socket send and re Open | 244706 | panic: NULL dereference inside __mtx_lock_sleep() Open | 246951 | carp(4): Active CARP member crashes: panic, trap_ Open | 118111 | rc: network.subr Add MAC address based interface 33 problems total for which you should take action. From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sun Jun 21 21:10:11 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EB653342A4 for ; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 21:10:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from melifaro@ipfw.ru) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49qlYb0Bl8z4dSQ for ; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 21:10:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from melifaro@ipfw.ru) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 029D533422E; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 21:10:11 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01FA63343AA; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 21:10:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from melifaro@ipfw.ru) Received: from forward500o.mail.yandex.net (forward500o.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:1a2d::610]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49qlYY5mQ6z4dbY; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 21:10:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from melifaro@ipfw.ru) Received: from mxback11q.mail.yandex.net (mxback11q.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:c0e:1b4:0:640:1f0c:10f2]) by forward500o.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 9789560271; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 00:10:05 +0300 (MSK) Received: from localhost (localhost [::1]) by mxback11q.mail.yandex.net (mxback/Yandex) with ESMTP id TFmiyBxwDr-A5d8jKxO; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 00:10:05 +0300 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ipfw.ru; s=mail; t=1592773805; bh=TS0jrS5jUdXWVvGUuGphirAta648X8DmAsnipM2Oydo=; h=References:Date:Message-Id:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From; b=RTW8CDWHuGk6D5M+J2Qh8FiOFuwoVqzdPCCK8c7/q7ibF6RtUfFCncNhZCpaazjLP ii5UUqsbevQmprciA3pCS3I5FJsNOBFPdT1OXuA3x25g7bDzGhq6eNTPvczJsg8W08 n6Cl42+n+Fx0uR6nhGXgoqdgJW+oQJI/8HR/lkwo= Received: by vla1-5413378edd9f.qloud-c.yandex.net with HTTP; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 00:10:04 +0300 From: Alexander V. Chernikov To: "current@FreeBSD.org" , net , freebsd-hackers In-Reply-To: <626011592740709@mail.yandex.ru> References: <626011592740709@mail.yandex.ru> Subject: Re: net.inet6.ip6.deembed_scopeid removal MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Yamail [ http://yandex.ru ] 5.0 Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2020 22:10:04 +0100 Message-Id: <645741592773762@mail.yandex.ru> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49qlYY5mQ6z4dbY X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=ipfw.ru header.s=mail header.b=RTW8CDWH; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of melifaro@ipfw.ru designates 2a02:6b8:0:1a2d::610 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=melifaro@ipfw.ru X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.88 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_SOME(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[ipfw.ru:s=mail]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.01)[-1.012]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a02:6b8:0:1000::/52:c]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[ipfw.ru]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.04)[-1.045]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[ipfw.ru:+]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.22)[-0.221]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:13238, ipnet:2a02:6b8::/32, country:RU]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[2a02:6b8:0:1a2d::610:from] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2020 21:10:11 -0000 [re-sending email with as non-html] Hey, I would like to deprecate net.inet6.ip6.deembed_scopeid sysctl while leaving the current default behaviour. This sysctl controls whether IPv6 scope is embedded in the IPv6 address or not when reading or writing route/interface/ifaddr data via rtsock/sysctl. Embedding scope in the address is a hack, that overwrites some of the bits that can be used otherwise. It was probably implemented that way to simplify route table interactions, as rtable uses this hack to add link-local addresses to the same radix tree. The change to fix the userland api by filling in sin6_scopeid and avoid touching IPv6 address was added in r243187, 7 years ago. It provided the sysctl in question, allowing to preserve compatibility with older applications, by reverting to the old behavior. 7 years looks like enough timeframe for the applications to be adjusted. Unless any major objections arise, I'm going to remove the code and make de-embedded IPv6 addresses the only option on July 5 2020. /Alexander From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sun Jun 21 23:05:48 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9E93337D19 for ; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 23:05:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from melifaro@ipfw.ru) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49qp701DP7z3Yh8 for ; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 23:05:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from melifaro@ipfw.ru) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 279403379D9; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 23:05:48 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25054337D89; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 23:05:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from melifaro@ipfw.ru) Received: from forward501j.mail.yandex.net (forward501j.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:801:2::111]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49qp6y1ZmMz3Yw1; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 23:05:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from melifaro@ipfw.ru) Received: from mxback10q.mail.yandex.net (mxback10q.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:c0e:1b4:0:640:b6ef:cb3]) by forward501j.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id D44BF3380064; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 02:05:41 +0300 (MSK) Received: from localhost (localhost [::1]) by mxback10q.mail.yandex.net (mxback/Yandex) with ESMTP id pZBTlDF1YE-5fd82uEr; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 02:05:41 +0300 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ipfw.ru; s=mail; t=1592780741; bh=gkgovdBpraTb6swxB2MuufFuBSYbNOP8Lq58pZhBCSU=; h=Message-Id:Date:Subject:To:From; b=mOTxj2WLj/wxAeVTxnalSCJjfo3kQv2spc4Awyms4PwUKadsSPyyBtTmgCGNaEnB4 CTno6+U+77PvMxUbXXcRokXjGBjZW0WcjO2/QZ7x59nh+8iuU+jlU7+e5/4apfVBYm JlN1z8u5fcOMOCNycr/mFWTGmtjBDso5xLQrYObg= Received: by vla1-b1f71bfb4f06.qloud-c.yandex.net with HTTP; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 02:05:41 +0300 From: Alexander V. Chernikov Envelope-From: melifaro@ipfw.ru To: "current@FreeBSD.org" , net , freebsd-hackers Subject: routed && route6d removal proposal MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Yamail [ http://yandex.ru ] 5.0 Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 00:05:41 +0100 Message-Id: <273191592779927@mail.yandex.ru> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49qp6y1ZmMz3Yw1 X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=ipfw.ru header.s=mail header.b=mOTxj2WL; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of melifaro@ipfw.ru designates 2a02:6b8:0:801:2::111 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=melifaro@ipfw.ru X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.35 / 15.00]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_SOME(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[ipfw.ru:s=mail]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.01)[-1.011]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a02:6b8:0::/52]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[freebsd.org]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.04)[-1.044]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[ipfw.ru:+]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.99)[-0.992]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[melifaro@freebsd.org,melifaro@ipfw.ru]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[2a02:6b8:0:801:2::111:from]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:13238, ipnet:2a02:6b8::/32, country:RU]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[melifaro@freebsd.org,melifaro@ipfw.ru] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2020 23:05:48 -0000 Hey, I would like to propose removal of sbin/routed and usr.sbin/route6d. routed(8) is the daemon implementing RIPv2 routing protocol. route6d(8) is the daemon implementing RIPng routing protocol for IPv6. RIP [1] was one of the first protocols used in the networking. The first version was implemented back in 1982. 1. Network landscape has changed since then. BGP, OSPF, IS-ISIS and other routing protocols have been created and greatly improved over years. People have created and adopted numerous designs leveraging OSPF/ISIS or BGP. RIP became obsolete a while ago as there were no competitive advantage it can offer. "It is the oldest routing protocol used by the network industry and is considered by many to be inefficient or border-line obsolete." — [2], 2009 "Today, the only reason you might run across a network running RIPv2 is either that the network is very old and in serious need of an upgrade or the network is running cheaper, consumer-grade routing hardware that can only support RIP" — [3], 2016. 1.1. Nowadays the daemon name is simply misleading. Given situation described above, one does expect far wider functionality from the program named "route[6]d" than just RIP implementation. 2. Multiple routing stacks supporting all major routing protocol including RIP exists these days: bird, frr, quagga. Many BGP-only designs in are gaining popularity, so do bgp speakers such as exabgp or gobgp. Nowadays, if one needs dynamic routing on the host, OSPF or BGP speaker is the choice. FreeBSD packages contains well-maintained ports for these. Having RIP[ng] speakers in base offers no advantage. 3. Both routed/route6d are largely unmaintained [4] and presents an additional attack vector. Here is the list of last non-trivial commits to routed/route6d: sbin/routed: r327276 - coverity r317035 - rtsock fix r299825 - coverity r299822 - coverity, from netbsd r299821 - coverity, from netbsd r299784 - coverity, from netbsd r299771 - coverify, from netbsd r286347 - bugfix r276602 - SA14:21 patch r271919 - SA14:21 fix r215702 - logic fix, 2010 usr.sbin/route6d: r337500 - functional fix, 2018 r317035 - rtsock fix r311994 - coverity r311985 - coverity r299869 - coverity r299491 - coverity r270234 - link-local fix r243233 - functionality improvement, 2012 To summarise: RIP protocol is obsolete, implementations for newer protocols exists in ports, implementation in base is unmaintained. With all that in mind I propose to remove routed and route6d from base in FreeBSD 13. Timeline: June 5 - feedback aggregation and decision point July 19 - removal (proposed) [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Routing_Information_Protocol [2] https://www.globalknowledge.com/ca-en/resources/resource-library/articles/basics-of-understanding-rip/ [3] https://www.networkcomputing.com/data-centers/comparing-dynamic-routing-protocols [4] https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=runnamed&list_id=361897&namedcmd=routed_prs /Alexander From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Mon Jun 22 03:29:53 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B35E33D06C for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 03:29:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cse.cem@gmail.com) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49qvzh58mDz43x3 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 03:29:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cse.cem@gmail.com) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id AE20733D2C2; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 03:29:52 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB87C33D324; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 03:29:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cse.cem@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ot1-f54.google.com (mail-ot1-f54.google.com [209.85.210.54]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49qvzh2ZCPz44Lc; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 03:29:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cse.cem@gmail.com) Received: by mail-ot1-f54.google.com with SMTP id u23so11935744otq.10; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 20:29:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:reply-to :from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ivSe/ieUSju4bSGuMoz1momk6Jpx0rDzm0iUsxqxdFs=; b=kH9/fE7XN9f+Hn3Seu8RrfLGhI//Gc/eC1k1UCdwEsYfJqX0WxjI+KFhhW7SSYW5B7 FNpaEA/6TXmZW9BKBfF85lhTSO7LOziADNIj+qgy5YxdxjAUwqumFx3W3cbtHHLA4kuE w7V9Tat5YXluuF+lZG6umQz5eDvuBjhFggvhaOTGk4bWzWGYRJn/CfNXhreRtC2phdy6 aGlARgrsNgKQ4g1rc+AOb0N++DtFcIRaOXxojgsSYNad+QePxfeVePCZpUmYLhSX+c+M L12xFdX9nbnS8icwTz4K13A5sr3ycRrZyHV64FiRkXh98wBhzxu8vGGTqjw/tloelmS/ PmUg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531GpUKYG+02rJe8SqPXVR34k2jFXqBTxexQPnAedRkqsjv4+EV4 UjIYDKpYr+xah/HaUL5I08Ojdzns X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJycfF1rt4HhD2kbJRpLdWdU7+z6uWIQaL38YwkfYmb4Htu6aGTXQI3VIvaTPyq58KaQ0QQ/cQ== X-Received: by 2002:a9d:80c:: with SMTP id 12mr12529624oty.208.1592796590787; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 20:29:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-ot1-f49.google.com (mail-ot1-f49.google.com. [209.85.210.49]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h22sm1113476oos.48.2020.06.21.20.29.50 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 21 Jun 2020 20:29:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ot1-f49.google.com with SMTP id d4so11961069otk.2; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 20:29:50 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a9d:2224:: with SMTP id o33mr12629681ota.216.1592796590201; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 20:29:50 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <273191592779927@mail.yandex.ru> In-Reply-To: <273191592779927@mail.yandex.ru> Reply-To: cem@freebsd.org From: Conrad Meyer Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2020 20:29:39 -0700 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: routed && route6d removal proposal To: "Alexander V. Chernikov" Cc: "current@FreeBSD.org" , net , freebsd-hackers Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49qvzh2ZCPz44Lc X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:209.85.128.0/17, country:US]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 03:29:53 -0000 Sounds good to me. We don't need a RIP daemon in base, and if needed, it is just a pkg install away via one of the myrriad maintained routing daemons. Thanks, Conrad On Sun, Jun 21, 2020 at 4:06 PM Alexander V. Chernikov wrote: > > Hey, > > I would like to propose removal of sbin/routed and usr.sbin/route6d. > > routed(8) is the daemon implementing RIPv2 routing protocol. > route6d(8) is the daemon implementing RIPng routing protocol for IPv6. > > RIP [1] was one of the first protocols used in the networking. The first= version was implemented back in 1982. > > 1. Network landscape has changed since then. BGP, OSPF, IS-ISIS and other= routing protocols have been created and greatly improved over years. Peopl= e have created and adopted numerous designs leveraging OSPF/ISIS or BGP. > RIP became obsolete a while ago as there were no competitive advantage it= can offer. > "It is the oldest routing protocol used by the network industry and is co= nsidered by many to be inefficient or border-line obsolete." =E2=80=94 [2],= 2009 > "Today, the only reason you might run across a network running RIPv2 is e= ither that the network is very old and in serious need of an upgrade or the= network is running cheaper, consumer-grade routing hardware that can only = support RIP" =E2=80=94 [3], 2016. > > 1.1. Nowadays the daemon name is simply misleading. Given situation descr= ibed above, one does expect far wider functionality from the program named = "route[6]d" than just RIP implementation. > > 2. Multiple routing stacks supporting all major routing protocol includin= g RIP exists these days: bird, frr, quagga. Many BGP-only designs in are ga= ining popularity, so do bgp speakers such as exabgp or gobgp. Nowadays, if= one needs dynamic routing on the host, OSPF or BGP speaker is the choice. = FreeBSD packages contains well-maintained ports for these. Having RIP[ng] s= peakers in base offers no advantage. > > 3. Both routed/route6d are largely unmaintained [4] and presents an addit= ional attack vector. Here is the list of last non-trivial commits to routed= /route6d: > > sbin/routed: > r327276 - coverity > r317035 - rtsock fix > r299825 - coverity > r299822 - coverity, from netbsd > r299821 - coverity, from netbsd > r299784 - coverity, from netbsd > r299771 - coverify, from netbsd > r286347 - bugfix > r276602 - SA14:21 patch > r271919 - SA14:21 fix > r215702 - logic fix, 2010 > > usr.sbin/route6d: > r337500 - functional fix, 2018 > r317035 - rtsock fix > r311994 - coverity > r311985 - coverity > r299869 - coverity > r299491 - coverity > r270234 - link-local fix > r243233 - functionality improvement, 2012 > > To summarise: RIP protocol is obsolete, implementations for newer protoco= ls exists in ports, implementation in base is unmaintained. > > With all that in mind I propose to remove routed and route6d from base in= FreeBSD 13. > Timeline: > June 5 - feedback aggregation and decision point > July 19 - removal (proposed) > > > [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Routing_Information_Protocol > [2] https://www.globalknowledge.com/ca-en/resources/resource-library/arti= cles/basics-of-understanding-rip/ > [3] https://www.networkcomputing.com/data-centers/comparing-dynamic-routi= ng-protocols > [4] https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=3Drunnamed&list= _id=3D361897&namedcmd=3Drouted_prs > > /Alexander > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org= " From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Mon Jun 22 03:59:28 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CDA933EA5A for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 03:59:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49qwdr1Mqpz46DG for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 03:59:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 2D39E33EA59; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 03:59:28 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B8CB33EE9A; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 03:59:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Received: from hz.grosbein.net (hz.grosbein.net [IPv6:2a01:4f8:c2c:26d8::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "hz.grosbein.net", Issuer "hz.grosbein.net" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49qwdp1QVlz46GZ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 03:59:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Received: from eg.sd.rdtc.ru (eg.sd.rdtc.ru [IPv6:2a03:3100:c:13:0:0:0:5]) by hz.grosbein.net (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 05M3xDbS005159 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 22 Jun 2020 03:59:17 GMT (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) X-Envelope-From: eugen@grosbein.net X-Envelope-To: melifaro@freebsd.org Received: from [10.58.0.10] (dadv@dadvw [10.58.0.10]) by eg.sd.rdtc.ru (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 05M3x4f3027888 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Mon, 22 Jun 2020 10:59:04 +0700 (+07) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Subject: Re: routed && route6d removal proposal To: "Alexander V. Chernikov" , "current@FreeBSD.org" , net , freebsd-hackers References: <273191592779927@mail.yandex.ru> From: Eugene Grosbein Message-ID: <7f5ee577-038f-4201-5abd-b562dbca61ec@grosbein.net> Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 10:59:03 +0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <273191592779927@mail.yandex.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,LOCAL_FROM, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Report: * -2.3 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record * -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record * 2.6 LOCAL_FROM From my domains X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on hz.grosbein.net X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49qwdp1QVlz46GZ X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=permerror (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of eugen@grosbein.net uses mechanism not recognized by this client) smtp.mailfrom=eugen@grosbein.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.20 / 15.00]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_SOME(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.58)[-0.580]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[grosbein.net]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.48)[-0.476]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; R_SPF_PERMFAIL(0.00)[empty SPF record]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.05)[-0.046]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:2a01:4f8::/29, country:DE]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 03:59:28 -0000 22.06.2020 6:05, Alexander V. Chernikov wrote: > To summarise: RIP protocol is obsolete, implementations for newer protocols exists in ports, implementation in base is unmaintained. Too many reasons but one real one: it's broken since FreeBSD 4 at least when I tried to use it in production and was forced to move to quagga that was actively maintained that time. Go with removal. From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Mon Jun 22 07:41:52 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27BAB343442 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 07:41:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from signature-sage@nbunlque.com) Received: from rdns0.nbunlque.com (nbunlque.com [192.119.65.38]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49r1ZR6h79z4Jkh for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 07:41:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from signature-sage@nbunlque.com) From: DHL GmbH To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Delivery Address Error Date: 22 Jun 2020 07:41:48 +0000 Message-ID: <20200622074148.D665306B96916F71@nbunlque.com> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49r1ZR6h79z4Jkh X-Spamd-Bar: --- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.05 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.01)[-1.011]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[nbunlque.com:s=default]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+a]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.99)[-0.987]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[nbunlque.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[nbunlque.com,quarantine]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.35)[-0.353]; MIME_HTML_ONLY(0.20)[]; RCVD_COUNT_ZERO(0.00)[0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:~]; ASN(0.00)[asn:54290, ipnet:192.119.64.0/18, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.33 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 07:41:52 -0000 From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Mon Jun 22 11:51:54 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB83F3487C6 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 11:51:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Richard.Scheffenegger@netapp.com) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49r76y2X3Yz4fCH for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 11:51:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Richard.Scheffenegger@netapp.com) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 56BA534866C; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 11:51:54 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 567EF348CE8 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 11:51:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Richard.Scheffenegger@netapp.com) Received: from NAM10-MW2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-mw2nam10on20613.outbound.protection.outlook.com [IPv6:2a01:111:f400:7e89::613]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.protection.outlook.com", Issuer "GlobalSign Organization Validation CA - SHA256 - G3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49r76x27VJz4fL7 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 11:51:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Richard.Scheffenegger@netapp.com) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=S5P8Ed08ND7+9hYqUaljLod8u0wYs8SKoZMTvtzcth3nmHsN/an4kBbeDoimVcrs5pZM6WBxVZoZGSgQnfU4QI9y840/k97f0RHbiD9wpGav6ZPCCIG2VbZtenBjnAA7IqvSvVGsVQVvLWaw2PAzjt8odqJc+3FQ3J7iNz8GFoE8MSm06sStFIsmDh3jNQT1Z2eWxFL1XlL/DtJwsyMeA9RjKQLzTx4DZaZo3ZjCn0nwbdo4FjIcrdEwGEcFyVvjmhHJbw5xbvVQJNntu8e/Bz26Cz34KQrmQamXcB0MrsLwjP1mtO9wtHgh06K6ZjNlr7yej0y963sowQq7ByJ7eQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=j4stWDRRbhlEvh2QlxhVzHaSEwExJitsB13s19bx3QQ=; b=Jn88vTBt7TKMJ3TLF6Ebnk0CjcU2iEdf11cmxQ8Ueem8/3pZtl1o4+ruZ4E3PILw7FVdkchUXHHkDo/AoYjIfR1dJgZuBaxlPl9y0acOqej5r8yYVjh/Uv6TLvZdbf4LZUlSQc+V6E7zdsiS6wtUYm5ZGXANZT4tSEoSHr8/kkM8MmU64NbPuX/HMQH0TgPmZdTKF3J4JsMZpPMNmp6CGMwMjcPEjtwGe1Oxv55144G0En166CsKzOJNFWLDYXlUNPUMvCtnkb7n/EKoHkwTly1BN590XfbK0yyWXw9a9gwM8MAcfQ2t/JIi+PPT+nIkFWoURDw8Fc8eZDjPe0dhcw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=netapp.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=netapp.com; dkim=pass header.d=netapp.com; arc=none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=netapp.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-netapp-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=j4stWDRRbhlEvh2QlxhVzHaSEwExJitsB13s19bx3QQ=; b=de8qtg+LhTwOXDZoOHvSc6zG7ixb6k+WwSiL+3nLTCO8UGXBT996QLN8xXK5ePZt8061lFadaac9mPiIJIvZBfDT85R2W4kEGZAl/SHrzHwoQf8hIqbA+WsnlKX1JaRmj7hdTS34J0bcX8ZlII1uOLgy2aEmk77S0X7GPwD08Fw= Received: from SN4PR0601MB3728.namprd06.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:803:51::24) by SN6PR06MB4237.namprd06.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:805:ac::13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3109.22; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 11:51:50 +0000 Received: from SN4PR0601MB3728.namprd06.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::1574:b602:fe3a:ff59]) by SN4PR0601MB3728.namprd06.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::1574:b602:fe3a:ff59%5]) with mapi id 15.20.3109.027; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 11:51:50 +0000 From: "Scheffenegger, Richard" To: "net@FreeBSD.org" Subject: SFP I2C interface in drivers (driver SIOCGI2C support) Thread-Topic: SFP I2C interface in drivers (driver SIOCGI2C support) Thread-Index: AdZIiUQnI8CRqlolSfGyJ1cTYjKkRA== Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 11:51:50 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: de-AT, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [185.236.167.136] x-ms-publictraffictype: Email x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 1185417d-2c6b-4990-204e-08d816a2a637 x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: SN6PR06MB4237: x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:6430; x-forefront-prvs: 0442E569BC x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1 x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: chsjUxDDlHLoVlXfrpus1nLMss11jFDVuTMIRHFHnKnmbYgkLd9g/0zNLychZy83MwTPpZyUOCwlCHVvH35gxlysyaP6n9BF7szuCrDfnA4k4Fgrggd21fp1UkloNE0aUBU9cppbZGI5J3wOD12cJBwltQc2XhX6jXYOdwFvQOIpmOyJhG0KJ4lrqauAB5n5rx00pd1N12Vh6Or2ErLODYPH0F80FoTb/cEPfMYUpl2wdFJKYAyYxhs1ieDL3mjqp+Z5YnyDYCL5UDAQKS/mUY2Plw8vfpu+UW+lcB+7rUqtA0gLynhOd0BcHoxxcHvm6r+VIV3uVNNxpKpUI6fanA== x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:SN4PR0601MB3728.namprd06.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFTY:; SFS:(4636009)(366004)(39860400002)(346002)(396003)(376002)(136003)(71200400001)(8936002)(86362001)(6916009)(9686003)(55016002)(2906002)(8676002)(66446008)(66476007)(66946007)(316002)(52536014)(5660300002)(478600001)(66556008)(76116006)(558084003)(6506007)(7696005)(33656002)(26005)(64756008)(186003); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: 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 x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: netapp.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 1185417d-2c6b-4990-204e-08d816a2a637 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 22 Jun 2020 11:51:50.1279 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 4b0911a0-929b-4715-944b-c03745165b3a X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: wZ2uae3EQpJVpBSFefWlTdgHU9v/jrCvdKox1lcRcoRvPpjy+S84PmBa7vi29fLRjkGfPdOk74R/8TF/tfXNDQ== X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: SN6PR06MB4237 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49r76x27VJz4fL7 X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=netapp.onmicrosoft.com header.s=selector1-netapp-onmicrosoft-com header.b=de8qtg+L; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of Richard.Scheffenegger@netapp.com designates 2a01:111:f400:7e89::613 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=Richard.Scheffenegger@netapp.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.02 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.97)[-0.967]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[netapp.onmicrosoft.com:s=selector1-netapp-onmicrosoft-com]; HAS_XOIP(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a01:111:f400::/48]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[netapp.com]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.98)[-0.980]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[netapp.onmicrosoft.com:+]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.58)[-0.577]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:8075, ipnet:2a01:111:f000::/36, country:US]; ARC_ALLOW(-1.00)[microsoft.com:s=arcselector9901:i=1] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 11:51:54 -0000 Hi, I am just curious if anyone is working to get the NIC drivers support to re= ad the pluggables I2C status (temperature, voltage level, optical power lev= els) from Intel NICs and Qlogic CNAs? Richard Scheffenegger From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Mon Jun 22 12:48:54 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB04734A721 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 12:48:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from melifaro@ipfw.ru) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49r8Nk2LTzz4kG2 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 12:48:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from melifaro@ipfw.ru) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 5078F34A720; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 12:48:54 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5042C34A92A for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 12:48:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from melifaro@ipfw.ru) Received: from forward500o.mail.yandex.net (forward500o.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:1a2d::610]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49r8Nh5MQXz4k96 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 12:48:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from melifaro@ipfw.ru) Received: from mxback2q.mail.yandex.net (mxback2q.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:c0e:40:0:640:9c8c:4946]) by forward500o.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 6993B60856; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 15:48:48 +0300 (MSK) Received: from localhost (localhost [::1]) by mxback2q.mail.yandex.net (mxback/Yandex) with ESMTP id pO83q4E62q-mlJehFri; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 15:48:47 +0300 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ipfw.ru; s=mail; t=1592830127; bh=WJrZLLtXRsKTx++i/ZB7oz2WVpPszvGqOGQsJmQ2Pzg=; h=References:Date:Message-Id:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From; b=BWuCM+bTI3nOSgn4ZHXgRUIfAYjnbkwaNA9yHMw9GaTD51U4v46Nq76JS8DcUyF3N vE0G1VsFw6Pfik8bXA54ZkCSl44VWjUHNbceVAE63a5ZeJD6Q8fupsYL0jRHAvvAc5 7L5Jl+QJO3YJb5OEle4okn9M8coaiQzQZ63w7zCw= Received: by vla4-d1c3bcedfacb.qloud-c.yandex.net with HTTP; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 15:48:47 +0300 From: Alexander V. Chernikov To: "Scheffenegger, Richard" , "net@FreeBSD.org" In-Reply-To: References: Subject: Re: SFP I2C interface in drivers (driver SIOCGI2C support) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Yamail [ http://yandex.ru ] 5.0 Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 13:48:47 +0100 Message-Id: <819721592829989@mail.yandex.ru> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49r8Nh5MQXz4k96 X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=ipfw.ru header.s=mail header.b=BWuCM+bT; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of melifaro@ipfw.ru designates 2a02:6b8:0:1a2d::610 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=melifaro@ipfw.ru X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.70 / 15.00]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_SOME(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[ipfw.ru:s=mail]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.96)[-0.962]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a02:6b8:0:1000::/52]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.002]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[ipfw.ru]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[ipfw.ru:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.14)[-1.136]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[2a02:6b8:0:1a2d::610:from]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:13238, ipnet:2a02:6b8::/32, country:RU]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 12:48:54 -0000 22.06.2020, 12:52, "Scheffenegger, Richard" : > Hi, > > I am just curious if anyone is working to get the NIC drivers support to read the pluggables I2C status (temperature, voltage level, optical power levels) from Intel NICs and Qlogic CNAs? Hi Richard, which Intel nics you're referring to? IIRC ixgbe/ixl SIOCGI2C support was added 5? years ago. > > Richard Scheffenegger > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Mon Jun 22 12:49:56 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16CFD34AB00 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 12:49:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49r8Pv3pmyz4k1B for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 12:49:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 8101C34AA94; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 12:49:55 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 806EA34A8FF; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 12:49:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net) Received: from gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (br1.CN84in.dnsmgr.net [69.59.192.140]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49r8Pv2Tcbz4k19; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 12:49:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net) Received: from gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id 05MCnr93010398; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 05:49:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net) Received: (from freebsd-rwg@localhost) by gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id 05MCnrKw010397; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 05:49:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg) From: "Rodney W. Grimes" Message-Id: <202006221249.05MCnrKw010397@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> Subject: Re: routed && route6d removal proposal In-Reply-To: <273191592779927@mail.yandex.ru> To: "Alexander V. Chernikov" Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 05:49:53 -0700 (PDT) CC: "current@FreeBSD.org" , net , freebsd-hackers X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL121h (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49r8Pv2Tcbz4k19 X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:13868, ipnet:69.59.192.0/19, country:US] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 12:49:56 -0000 > Hey, > > I would like to propose removal of sbin/routed and usr.sbin/route6d. I disagree with removal, as your analysis is flawed. > routed(8) is the daemon implementing RIPv2 routing protocol. > route6d(8) is the daemon implementing RIPng routing protocol for IPv6. > > RIP [1] was one of the first protocols used in the networking. The first version was implemented back in 1982. RIPv1 was implemented in 1982, RIPv2 became RFC2453 in November 1998, and is a current and valid IETF standard, STD56. It was updated by RFC4822 in February 2007. > > 1. Network landscape has changed since then. BGP, OSPF, IS-ISIS and other routing protocols have been created and greatly improved over years. People have created and adopted numerous designs leveraging OSPF/ISIS or BGP. > RIP became obsolete a while ago as there were no competitive advantage it can offer. > "It is the oldest routing protocol used by the network industry and is considered by many to be inefficient or border-line obsolete." ? [2], 2009 RIPv2 is not obosolete, and your reference is not authoritave on what is or is not an obsolete network protocol. I know of people using RIPv2 in networks. > "Today, the only reason you might run across a network running RIPv2 is either that the network is very old and in serious need of an upgrade or the network is running cheaper, consumer-grade routing hardware that can only support RIP" ? [3], 2016. Or there simply is no need for anything more complicated. RipV2 is a very simple protocol and works fine for small networks in many settings. > > 1.1. Nowadays the daemon name is simply misleading. Given situation described above, one does expect far wider functionality from the program named "route[6]d" than just RIP implementation. I'll agree the name is missleading, so change it, but removal on your false basis is not. > > 2. Multiple routing stacks supporting all major routing protocol including RIP exists these days: bird, frr, quagga. Many BGP-only designs in are gaining popularity, so do bgp speakers such as exabgp or gobgp. Nowadays, if one needs dynamic routing on the host, OSPF or BGP speaker is the choice. FreeBSD packages contains well-maintained ports for these. Having RIP[ng] speakers in base offers no advantage. Routing stacks? You mean routing daemons? Forcing users to install bir, frr or quagga when all they need, or have been using for a long time is in base ripv2 is not good for users. > 3. Both routed/route6d are largely unmaintained [4] and presents an additional attack vector. Here is the list of last non-trivial commits to routed/route6d: Whats unmaintained about code that has no need to change cause it just pretty much works? > > sbin/routed: > r327276 - coverity > r317035 - rtsock fix > r299825 - coverity > r299822 - coverity, from netbsd > r299821 - coverity, from netbsd > r299784 - coverity, from netbsd > r299771 - coverify, from netbsd > r286347 - bugfix > r276602 - SA14:21 patch > r271919 - SA14:21 fix > r215702 - logic fix, 2010 > > usr.sbin/route6d: > r337500 - functional fix, 2018 > r317035 - rtsock fix > r311994 - coverity > r311985 - coverity > r299869 - coverity > r299491 - coverity > r270234 - link-local fix > r243233 - functionality improvement, 2012 > > To summarise: RIP protocol is obsolete, implementations for newer protocols exists in ports, implementation in base is unmaintained. > > With all that in mind I propose to remove routed and route6d from base in FreeBSD 13. > Timeline: > June 5 - feedback aggregation and decision point > July 19 - removal (proposed) > > > [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Routing_Information_Protocol > [2] https://www.globalknowledge.com/ca-en/resources/resource-library/articles/basics-of-understanding-rip/ > [3] https://www.networkcomputing.com/data-centers/comparing-dynamic-routing-protocols > [4] https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=runnamed&list_id=361897&namedcmd=routed_prs > > /Alexander > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > -- Rod Grimes rgrimes@freebsd.org From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Mon Jun 22 13:27:10 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5A3334BF0E for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 13:27:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49r9Dt0ymXz4nBp for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 13:27:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 1D8DA34BE71; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 13:27:10 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D01534BD76; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 13:27:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Received: from hz.grosbein.net (hz.grosbein.net [IPv6:2a01:4f8:c2c:26d8::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "hz.grosbein.net", Issuer "hz.grosbein.net" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49r9Ds1LP7z4n8f; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 13:27:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Received: from eg.sd.rdtc.ru (eg.sd.rdtc.ru [IPv6:2a03:3100:c:13:0:0:0:5]) by hz.grosbein.net (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 05MDQvLb011277 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 22 Jun 2020 13:26:59 GMT (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) X-Envelope-From: eugen@grosbein.net X-Envelope-To: freebsd-rwg@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net Received: from [10.58.0.10] (dadv@dadvw [10.58.0.10]) by eg.sd.rdtc.ru (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 05MDQqhN031277 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Mon, 22 Jun 2020 20:26:53 +0700 (+07) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Subject: Re: routed && route6d removal proposal To: "Rodney W. Grimes" , "Alexander V. Chernikov" References: <202006221249.05MCnrKw010397@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> Cc: "current@FreeBSD.org" , net , freebsd-hackers From: Eugene Grosbein Message-ID: <960ce7d8-f964-a686-dd79-242145b3ae5c@grosbein.net> Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 20:26:51 +0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <202006221249.05MCnrKw010397@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,LOCAL_FROM, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Report: * -2.3 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record * -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record * 2.6 LOCAL_FROM From my domains X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on hz.grosbein.net X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49r9Ds1LP7z4n8f X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=permerror (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of eugen@grosbein.net uses mechanism not recognized by this client) smtp.mailfrom=eugen@grosbein.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.32 / 15.00]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_SOME(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.84)[-0.845]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.88)[-0.883]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[grosbein.net]; RCPT_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_PERMFAIL(0.00)[empty SPF record]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.49)[-0.492]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:2a01:4f8::/29, country:DE]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 13:27:10 -0000 22.06.2020 19:49, Rodney W. Grimes wrote: > Whats unmaintained about code that has no need to change cause it just pretty much works? Have you actually tried running routed(8) as base for real network with loops, mix of p2p and ethernet-like interfaces, IPv4 aliases, need of offset-lists and with diameter about 6 hops? I'm not talking about RIPv2 inherent deficiencies. Our routed just glitches where quagga's ripd just works. From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Mon Jun 22 13:54:38 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70F5B34CC0E for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 13:54:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hrs@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49r9rZ2Sbfz4qVP for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 13:54:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hrs@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 515E034CBA4; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 13:54:38 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50C7134C9B7; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 13:54:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hrs@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [96.47.72.83]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49r9rZ1PRvz4qXB; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 13:54:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hrs@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2400:4051:a743:3c00:16:ceff:fe34:2700]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: hrs) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3214633254; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 13:54:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hrs@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 22:40:15 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20200622.224015.2228079563921213662.hrs@FreeBSD.org> To: melifaro@ipfw.ru Cc: current@freebsd.org, net@freebsd.org, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: net.inet6.ip6.deembed_scopeid removal From: Hiroki Sato In-Reply-To: <645741592773762@mail.yandex.ru> References: <626011592740709@mail.yandex.ru> <645741592773762@mail.yandex.ru> X-Old-PGPkey-fingerprint: BDB3 443F A5DD B3D0 A530 FFD7 4F2C D3D8 2793 CF2D X-PGPkey-fingerprint: 6C0D 2353 27CF 80C7 901E FDD2 DBB0 7DC6 6F1F 737F X-Mailer: Mew version 6.8 on Emacs 26.3 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Multipart/Signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512; boundary="--Security_Multipart(Mon_Jun_22_22_40_15_2020_216)--" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 13:54:38 -0000 ----Security_Multipart(Mon_Jun_22_22_40_15_2020_216)-- Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit "Alexander V. Chernikov" wrote in <645741592773762@mail.yandex.ru>: me> [re-sending email with as non-html] me> me> Hey, me> me> I would like to deprecate net.inet6.ip6.deembed_scopeid sysctl while me> leaving the current default behaviour. me> me> This sysctl controls whether IPv6 scope is embedded in the IPv6 me> address or not when reading or writing route/interface/ifaddr data via me> rtsock/sysctl. me> me> Embedding scope in the address is a hack, that overwrites some of the me> bits that can be used otherwise. It was probably implemented that way me> to simplify route table interactions, as rtable uses this hack to add me> link-local addresses to the same radix tree. me> me> The change to fix the userland api by filling in sin6_scopeid and me> avoid touching IPv6 address was added in r243187, 7 years ago. It me> provided the sysctl in question, allowing to preserve compatibility me> with older applications, by reverting to the old behavior. me> me> 7 years looks like enough timeframe for the applications to be me> adjusted. Unless any major objections arise, I'm going to remove the me> code and make de-embedded IPv6 addresses the only option on July 5 me> 2020. I agree that it is time to remove it and I do not think we need to wait more. This knob was for debugging purpose rather than for keeping compatibility. A concern was that recovering the scopeid might have performance penalty. -- Hiroki ----Security_Multipart(Mon_Jun_22_22_40_15_2020_216)-- Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iMkEABMKAC4WIQRsDSNTJ8+Ax5Ae/dLbsH3Gbx9zfwUCXvC0vxAcaHJzQGZyZWVi c2Qub3JnAAoJENuwfcZvH3N/07gCCJDGMuuj3AcZoIfHbf+yrdGL/8Ox3/gnMw/C m3giiNCVHDSvWOgz/6/V+Tk0bOYuLcL95Y6V59sOIEojejYfm24fAgkBr48RfN4Z 8cTc1TGkjupVEebByICBQV4nAQYMj6naQd+A5nxOwZEfDsqpouqQmxLCVu/O5b2u rygd5E9CTMlJQPw= =suQy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ----Security_Multipart(Mon_Jun_22_22_40_15_2020_216)---- From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Mon Jun 22 13:54:40 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F52434C862 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 13:54:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hrs@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49r9rb5n6Qz4qVQ for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 13:54:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hrs@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id A9D0834CC93; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 13:54:39 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A852634CC92; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 13:54:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hrs@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::24b:4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49r9rb3z12z4q6W; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 13:54:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hrs@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2400:4051:a743:3c00:16:ceff:fe34:2700]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: hrs) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7643F32D7D; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 13:54:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hrs@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 22:46:21 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20200622.224621.1160033569666141710.hrs@FreeBSD.org> To: melifaro@freebsd.org Cc: current@freebsd.org, net@freebsd.org, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: routed && route6d removal proposal From: Hiroki Sato In-Reply-To: <273191592779927@mail.yandex.ru> References: <273191592779927@mail.yandex.ru> X-Old-PGPkey-fingerprint: BDB3 443F A5DD B3D0 A530 FFD7 4F2C D3D8 2793 CF2D X-PGPkey-fingerprint: 6C0D 2353 27CF 80C7 901E FDD2 DBB0 7DC6 6F1F 737F X-Mailer: Mew version 6.8 on Emacs 26.3 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Multipart/Signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512; boundary="--Security_Multipart(Mon_Jun_22_22_46_21_2020_256)--" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 13:54:40 -0000 ----Security_Multipart(Mon_Jun_22_22_46_21_2020_256)-- Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit "Alexander V. Chernikov" wrote in <273191592779927@mail.yandex.ru>: me> Hey, me> me> I would like to propose removal of sbin/routed and usr.sbin/route6d. I am still using both of them in production environments because they work well at least for my configurations and most of promising alternatives are under GPL, not BSDL. Why do we need to rush to remove them? Discussion about whether we should keep or remove such old bits tends to be controversial when there is a user like me. I would agree with the removal if they were harmful or impossible to maintain, but would not for the reason that they are simply old and probably no one uses it today. Reason 1 and 2 look like the latter at least to me. "too old to be worth keeping" is a matter of degree. Uucp, rlogind, and timed should be removed (and were removed) because there are few non-FreeBSD platforms which support these protocols. RIP is still widely supported---just like FTP, which nowadays no one prefers to use and major www browsers are about to drop the support of---and not be considered an inherently vulnerable protocol like telnet. And keeping these daemons is not harmful even for users who want to use third-party routing daemons you listed. me> 1.1. Nowadays the daemon name is simply misleading. Given situation me> described above, one does expect far wider functionality from the me> program named "route[6]d" than just RIP implementation. I do not think this is a good reason to remove something nor people have got confused actually. If this is true, quagga or bird are much worse. me> 2. Multiple routing stacks supporting all major routing protocol me> including RIP exists these days: bird, frr, quagga. Many BGP-only me> designs in are gaining popularity, so do bgp speakers such as exabgp me> or gobgp. Nowadays, if one needs dynamic routing on the host, OSPF or me> BGP speaker is the choice. FreeBSD packages contains well-maintained me> ports for these. Having RIP[ng] speakers in base offers no advantage. me> me> 3. Both routed/route6d are largely unmaintained [4] and presents an me> additional attack vector. Here is the list of last non-trivial commits me> to routed/route6d: I think this is a separate issue. What attack vectors which are known to be vulnerable do they have? The small commit counts are not equal to its unreliability. Older daemons such as ppp(8), dhclient(8), ftpd(8), or bootpd(8) have received few substantial changes in recent years because they are mature. I am not a strong protester and will be happy to keep them as ports if everyone wants to remove them and it will happen, but I would like consistent criteria on removing software in the base system (they do not need to be perfect nor strict, though). I believe harmfulness is more important than the fact that it is old or we have more choices in the ports tree. If we have negative factors on maintaining them, removing them would be one of the choices as a result. If the existing routed/route6d makes difficulty on people who want to use third-party routing daemons, it should be fixed. These kind of harmfulness look below the threshold to me at this moment though I may be biased because I am still using them today... -- Hiroki ----Security_Multipart(Mon_Jun_22_22_46_21_2020_256)-- Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iMkEABMKAC4WIQRsDSNTJ8+Ax5Ae/dLbsH3Gbx9zfwUCXvC2LRAcaHJzQGZyZWVi c2Qub3JnAAoJENuwfcZvH3N/CMoCAwU3QXmLf0e6VHa4PKuZaDhhGrYPIu8NDMyA 1cifIfh2FZZZ9zKRnbag7ruFlWGHdiwXdznVKJPElL3n1NM2IdFlAgkBgStnQlfP hI2LJd+sQihZYyltMumHnbaAUcrfq+NlfFSKjUvYcO9dnS+bzRK4HEd6FDr58L5d 9YydnNdsQXzK1UA= =j9L7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ----Security_Multipart(Mon_Jun_22_22_46_21_2020_256)---- From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Mon Jun 22 14:28:15 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2CB834DCC1 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 14:28:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Richard.Scheffenegger@netapp.com) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49rBbM323Bz4tJv for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 14:28:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Richard.Scheffenegger@netapp.com) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 65F4034DCC0; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 14:28:15 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 648B034D9F9 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 14:28:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Richard.Scheffenegger@netapp.com) Received: from NAM11-BN8-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bn8nam11on2043.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.236.43]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.protection.outlook.com", Issuer "GlobalSign Organization Validation CA - SHA256 - G3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49rBbK4yLbz4tCc for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 14:28:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Richard.Scheffenegger@netapp.com) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=bkuKrhEeXmn2WMGuIRFFcdT5NwF1uy0p8R3IX8H8+AzLRXdYvqeZfdoTZC9wC42oQYXJQeeo+9+TlSZ+14XrWPNkwy/d6Y+A8ZVYnpjp+YBloRv4XmFoLw8MaN/YJ87G+rtzZeQQzsfJZmVb9ax40kxbgEingl5BbIjiBZJREI4WWvlC1GR/N/ftyllixjdM1uetDYHC9FhpqCjXgiyLDG0wa5vrKx9LFlnUSNTgj5pvMNVd9sDze+Fu9NfP3ycYGXDhUa9VZ4N4zi++PkyzEqv+owCWAJwSGI/OCQ5RpWLOhtILzUl7DU/vcBbT6weSb861aFYHD/vka5fyMdYvug== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=qjzr9aGYdHwmnb/cOuZgSDEuhBZNdzub6zZ6nvcRbHA=; b=K5tuQvguUP6DnVmOjuK843wBdifNxOkx9zJEaWSA13+0oe8/m8WL5ZBsoJP02fCLnvkhtlqJEl3IfE4/93NY/Yyzg9TDYOlau/rQEw9e3eLkl4kokA8l9px5Z4WnYCjOyQ5dIg9GtIXCXU3reVZoXYO19qdB0Niymau5MjxbGwzZAemh+8lsrqhtOhhLb4aGDJJIAv06rESfemlFkDzaucgtFvYt3V+x8bhsea9l8me3ayiXy+b1sM1SQ0F50396Wi6AjM4x5rVFNfeoP12ACSHW5V48sxoRPjP+aYQECyUJ1gWDST+9VVxr/z/FazFQMFY1FYFGPZZKISik1i+cMA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=netapp.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=netapp.com; dkim=pass header.d=netapp.com; arc=none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=netapp.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-netapp-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=qjzr9aGYdHwmnb/cOuZgSDEuhBZNdzub6zZ6nvcRbHA=; b=z3n5cCJT7Anm37J0k0X2cN76g2WpxfK3x7L62rg0fjTR30KBDA9ot58qH19OUjRjGH/Md+XN4mvjYCYkDM/OME0bHbD2PH7aTG/Bg7NkibEVQFXQyyQlUftqeEPonzv3u17YR8xGmqYZt6UWvvt6+TaIAoYGvfCvoWJ3qc4mUfQ= Received: from SN4PR0601MB3728.namprd06.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:803:51::24) by SN6PR06MB4304.namprd06.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:805:ab::14) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3109.21; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 14:28:10 +0000 Received: from SN4PR0601MB3728.namprd06.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::1574:b602:fe3a:ff59]) by SN4PR0601MB3728.namprd06.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::1574:b602:fe3a:ff59%5]) with mapi id 15.20.3109.027; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 14:28:10 +0000 From: "Scheffenegger, Richard" To: Alexander V.Chernikov CC: "net@FreeBSD.org" Subject: RE: SFP I2C interface in drivers (driver SIOCGI2C support) Thread-Topic: SFP I2C interface in drivers (driver SIOCGI2C support) Thread-Index: AdZIiUQnI8CRqlolSfGyJ1cTYjKkRAACjQqAAALjNlA= Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 14:28:10 +0000 Message-ID: References: <819721592829989@mail.yandex.ru> In-Reply-To: <819721592829989@mail.yandex.ru> Accept-Language: de-AT, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [185.236.167.136] x-ms-publictraffictype: Email x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: d23bb95c-18f4-45d9-65a8-08d816b87d39 x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: SN6PR06MB4304: x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:8273; x-forefront-prvs: 0442E569BC x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1 x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: kQbabc4YbCKY380P9B7bwswvCCGDPR8oRm00yesWx0R88r41rs5ytkUsoN+BwYkkoPko4X1uotrMi3ueaFGP4WJjJwPHC0R69NICFiklpGnaIVpFCIBixMyKXKTB+a4wwKi23oUF0lY3sSt3FEamvFF8z9U4J1v0/hy7BwKLRQTzV1mkJ15505N9RN6oh6gJW55a3JAvs/99Z+LcF+9UtLG9s54psoSO2RIC6LS/TeE6W9kBLKzLOV3KvMVBAdx2o5+XlxyxcwWfbsBMx1N/iDez6ux9IkQNDY/GBnGATM2ddk+s5BbfvbHnEVyADrA2XK+h1xAky/ZJEVGzFZTz0zkDpCvGMASHorh2vRwttrceOo8g81lUpbXfCgKxyw0N4FZpFJo0o93hP8tEHVDWhw== x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:SN4PR0601MB3728.namprd06.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFTY:; SFS:(4636009)(136003)(396003)(376002)(39860400002)(346002)(366004)(9686003)(52536014)(26005)(8936002)(5660300002)(55016002)(8676002)(2906002)(86362001)(186003)(76116006)(66556008)(66946007)(66476007)(6916009)(71200400001)(6506007)(64756008)(53546011)(66446008)(4326008)(966005)(33656002)(83380400001)(7696005)(316002)(478600001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: 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 x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: netapp.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: d23bb95c-18f4-45d9-65a8-08d816b87d39 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 22 Jun 2020 14:28:10.2602 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 4b0911a0-929b-4715-944b-c03745165b3a X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: aW5CM9haV7e1aK6bnldiXRQ4ONxQ8NbC0v/EvYymTnrMtyaMEOYggrB3uUUmjgZIUx6cArqf0DGg9U+shTgk2A== X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: SN6PR06MB4304 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49rBbK4yLbz4tCc X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=netapp.onmicrosoft.com header.s=selector1-netapp-onmicrosoft-com header.b=z3n5cCJT; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of Richard.Scheffenegger@netapp.com designates 40.107.236.43 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=Richard.Scheffenegger@netapp.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.77 / 15.00]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.96)[-0.957]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[netapp.onmicrosoft.com:s=selector1-netapp-onmicrosoft-com]; HAS_XOIP(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:40.107.0.0/16]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.97)[-0.972]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[netapp.com]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[netapp.onmicrosoft.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[40.107.236.43:from]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.34)[-1.337]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:8075, ipnet:40.104.0.0/14, country:US]; ARC_ALLOW(-1.00)[microsoft.com:s=arcselector9901:i=1]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[40.107.236.43:from] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 14:28:15 -0000 Hi Alex, I was looking for the SIOCGI2C socket ioctl API, and did not find it in the= intel driver. Which led me to believe this was the reason for me not seein= g the SFP data. But after correctly looking up the SFP info (the port was in a different j= ail, which confused me), it turns out that it's not Intel NIC, but Qlogic C= NA who are not providing this info when in IP mode. slot 0: 1G/10G Ethernet Controller CNA EP 8324 (Dual-port, QLogic CNA 8324(8362) rev. 2) e0f MAC Address: 00:a0:98:ef:a9:4c (auto-10g_twinax-fd-u= p) e0e MAC Address: 00:a0:98:ef:a9:4b (auto-10g_twinax-fd-u= p) Device Type: EP8324N Firmware Version: 5.4.66.0 ql0@pci0:14:0:0: class=3D0x020000 card=3D0xfb051275 chip=3D0x8830107= 7 rev=3D0x02 hdr=3D0x00 vendor =3D 'QLogic Corp.' class =3D network subclass =3D ethernet Which is the driver qlxgbe... Richard Scheffenegger -----Original Message----- From: Alexander V.Chernikov =20 Sent: Montag, 22. Juni 2020 14:49 To: Scheffenegger, Richard ; net@FreeBSD.= org Subject: Re: SFP I2C interface in drivers (driver SIOCGI2C support) NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links or o= pen attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is saf= e. 22.06.2020, 12:52, "Scheffenegger, Richard" : > Hi, > > I am just curious if anyone is working to get the NIC drivers support to = read the pluggables I2C status (temperature, voltage level, optical power l= evels) from Intel NICs and Qlogic CNAs? Hi Richard, which Intel nics you're referring to? IIRC ixgbe/ixl SIOCGI2C support was a= dded 5? years ago. > > Richard Scheffenegger > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Mon Jun 22 15:05:13 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65CD034F1B3 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 15:05:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Norman.Gray@glasgow.ac.uk) Received: from plockton.cent.gla.ac.uk (plockton.cent.gla.ac.uk [130.209.16.75]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49rCPw0xbSz3SjL for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 15:05:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Norman.Gray@glasgow.ac.uk) Received: from cas08.campus.gla.ac.uk ([130.209.14.165]) by plockton.cent.gla.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1jnO0P-0001JV-TQ for freebsd-net@freebsd.org; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 16:05:05 +0100 Received: from cas07.campus.gla.ac.uk (130.209.14.164) by cas08.campus.gla.ac.uk (130.209.14.165) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 16:05:05 +0100 Received: from GBR01-CWL-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (104.47.20.55) by cas07.campus.gla.ac.uk (130.209.14.164) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 16:05:05 +0100 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=OLVuIZCp+CgZgd8kMsIu0RyAaJw0Bc6ggeWzFXQAPhNPBRpYBkfK+ldV6QXnaT3MK/VBc0ks6SPA/w2ZIvvSeRxFizOpQBu/QrakhcX5RoB1Zo+NGXwJHTTGa5dsRcp1k0kf/m7chbvQ297bl+IfCtegae26rcLSe8GKctSMFbJ+wK8eiHhTIG7ohrFtpvA4WvVGBEqtOfDlEEV+kKAfiLqcF4SOZSBSPJnCeBDRKjXrgCr2V7BVGns+iQdWp6U7939HcljdySJ8fD8ATzMWEyFIjIac4M7LRpW0xVuv95lfjZwfXQpanTNE8ojnlcy+14MtAOt6fSMnNPZy+giQ9Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=YurFWVtAtuIaJHE+xxlJY8SYRNsC0iw3LywcOhW08Ds=; b=EF8LNnBzYPuehWfBpJqS9WfyifCUY7JuE819Pmw5KdbOzgtPw6WJ70As8WKI34/Mf6EHe3XNnnYSqRPMZ+344Wshs4vFBtwCUtiRqCHZRDFgAih3M51KPDodUm7N18P2250jquWdyiJub4bPhdIuAjdeO+/AV+LaLZ2TiLQEFIOVRcgR24w74leVzznAlWjumNQI+8XF3aTEfJrcfzRe2KbsjLrDdHcaPuWnEu42dDoCe1wyszY8OfpSR9AmznUEWQE71HKoqqIdpkl3HUA9NuI78MtPMJgvpR2w6W6k01FfsvuhUlRr+Aaz0adb2FBCs+c+miBpoMOhL7lx3WUx3w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=glasgow.ac.uk; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=glasgow.ac.uk; dkim=pass header.d=glasgow.ac.uk; arc=none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gla.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-gla-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=YurFWVtAtuIaJHE+xxlJY8SYRNsC0iw3LywcOhW08Ds=; b=FLfOX9WZCAL4vXWqnwagy9ipAeqK2vVg+LJwc0V+z6lEWNhK5qWYMByUtSPCqqJ5mYzzp+PjUDAAHt8EpWGPDVgd+5kW0bbR4W4HXDzAfUWl/q0mBdyVxPbg2mWUoaxNiV928g8muNzqACLgHlPfMXsYM5mX7QmAQ44Uf1iFb7k= Received: from CWXP265MB0149.GBRP265.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (2603:10a6:401:8::19) by CWXP265MB1701.GBRP265.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (2603:10a6:401:49::19) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3109.23; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 15:05:05 +0000 Received: from CWXP265MB0149.GBRP265.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM ([fe80::3819:6bd1:5e65:56b7]) by CWXP265MB0149.GBRP265.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM ([fe80::3819:6bd1:5e65:56b7%5]) with mapi id 15.20.3109.027; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 15:05:05 +0000 From: "Norman Gray" To: Subject: nfsuserd in a jail Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 16:05:03 +0100 X-Mailer: MailMate (1.13.1r5671) Message-ID: <962F77B1-8038-452E-92E5-9A1006424C7A@glasgow.ac.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-ClientProxiedBy: LO2P265CA0084.GBRP265.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (2603:10a6:600:8::24) To CWXP265MB0149.GBRP265.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (2603:10a6:401:8::19) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MS-Exchange-MessageSentRepresentingType: 1 Received: from [130.209.33.192] (81.2.70.164) by LO2P265CA0084.GBRP265.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (2603:10a6:600:8::24) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3109.24 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 15:05:04 +0000 X-Mailer: MailMate (1.13.1r5671) X-Originating-IP: [81.2.70.164] X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: c86b5784-302b-4511-2635-08d816bda52d X-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: CWXP265MB1701: X-MS-Exchange-Transport-Forked: True X-Microsoft-Antispam-PRVS: X-MS-Oob-TLC-OOBClassifiers: OLM:9508; X-Forefront-PRVS: 0442E569BC X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck: 1 X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0; X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info: 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 X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:CWXP265MB0149.GBRP265.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFTY:; SFS:(39860400002)(366004)(376002)(396003)(136003)(346002)(6916009)(786003)(316002)(186003)(966005)(2906002)(478600001)(8936002)(8676002)(2616005)(36756003)(956004)(66946007)(66476007)(66556008)(16576012)(6706004)(26005)(16526019)(33656002)(83380400001)(6486002)(86362001)(5660300002)(3480700007)(52116002)(78286006); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData: 0hZi1xPvMXCKz7IhcJLelB18KNWJ9DHFCTcs3tolYwX1OvSP52DrqV5N4/AIs75i5coF7VKmJF6PjRFpus/QeuPPz9U0BZ9Ln8Xpf6M9snQ/0apHlJZmgYYIAvy9m1XdHE0NxnwBMgtz9MygH887D1ld04iHzZxzAFezsLve1czr3gV5+f7QdazMdCWBfctfwFonkD+22erwToX2isl1tRj9iEcr4aPMrDUUQICvPRIAy4FyIM+5PN7RE4e6ho+/dNhYBy8oV0CbNm0Rdng8l8PNrF/lDUM502un01N2QgRT7+ABTvW3Hs9aR8T0IJjdauphEgEaYmfk86fIM1lymLHfCnYwO2GFBea/zmXjAnQ6hO3O9CwLw7FghrXhf5hUqcf+nRFX1ghy90Dy/Y/D0+rmKI7KfFWuJmvq+LXBfoiGUIm5Y9/onZW5NUXYVJJtKtXipq6d6W78ZnK9in8cb+WGIxBKhjSaCRA57FGvYyg= X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: c86b5784-302b-4511-2635-08d816bda52d X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Jun 2020 15:05:05.0333 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 6e725c29-763a-4f50-81f2-2e254f0133c8 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-MailboxType: HOSTED X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-UserPrincipalName: 3q7FbPYbRoSClJrDduNdtpJlG3KJwz8QBX3eA1Nu5J/dTpwScj4qGyK3uPLAhOJFysbacEywVwSkZB6zQvKD29D+MZVedGOf8lIoQqANjgI= X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: CWXP265MB1701 X-OriginatorOrg: glasgow.ac.uk X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49rCPw0xbSz3SjL X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gla.onmicrosoft.com header.s=selector2-gla-onmicrosoft-com header.b=FLfOX9WZ; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of Norman.Gray@glasgow.ac.uk has no SPF policy when checking 130.209.16.75) smtp.mailfrom=Norman.Gray@glasgow.ac.uk X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.35 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.87)[-0.871]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gla.onmicrosoft.com:s=selector2-gla-onmicrosoft-com]; HAS_XOIP(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_GOOD(0.00)[130.209.16.75:from]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.99)[-0.990]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[glasgow.ac.uk]; RCVD_DKIM_ARC_DNSWL_MED(-0.50)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED(-0.20)[130.209.16.75:from]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gla.onmicrosoft.com:+]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.49)[-0.492]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:786, ipnet:130.209.0.0/16, country:GB]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_SEVEN(0.00)[7]; ARC_ALLOW(-1.00)[microsoft.com:s=arcselector9901:i=1] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 15:05:13 -0000 Greetings. There is a 'fixed' bug [1] referring to problems that nfsuserd has, when working in a jail. This appears to explain a problem I'm having getting nfsuserd running within a jail on a 12.0-RELEASE machine (which I'm aware is now EoL, since we're beyond 12.1-RELEASE + 3 months). The BUGS section in the nfsuserd manpage does mention this bug, which (based on the last few comments in that ticket) confirms that the fix isn't present in the version I'm running. The last comment (dated 2019-04-21) mentions Flags: mfc-stable12? → mfc-stable12+ Flags: mfc-stable11? → mfc-stable11+ Flags: mfc-stable10? → mfc-stable10+ Could someone expand on the status of this for me? Does this mean that these fixes _are_ in 12.1 (so that nfsuserd should work on that)? If so, how could I work that out for myself? (I've been putting off updating that machine, but this may promote the task to not-optional). Best wishes, Norman [1] https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205193 -- Norman Gray : http://www.astro.gla.ac.uk/users/norman/it/ Research IT Coordinator : School of Physics and Astronomy // My current template week for IT tasks is: Monday, Tuesday, and Friday From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Mon Jun 22 15:50:41 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A89E1330B60 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 15:50:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rmacklem@uoguelph.ca) Received: from CAN01-QB1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-qb1can01on0613.outbound.protection.outlook.com [IPv6:2a01:111:f400:fe5c::613]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.protection.outlook.com", Issuer "GlobalSign Organization Validation CA - SHA256 - G3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49rDQS4PZPz3XgB for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 15:50:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rmacklem@uoguelph.ca) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=QNk27BtC+z2c3zw8TvteaqnREDD1zqJrPXb0KgFlWBp0Hbi9pkJ0pdDW9IHkTG1INy9F+XxNjVlueHQfG4+2enYjKAbJIssUCAJ2JQ394sf9MQBjjEgk//TxJ8KtHuPYVKbIofFwHs32y/K48Hlh3IHpZbAxKs5qxw9btiEYOn/PyllrPzyhu3xcKxwVr5rtYJQ0kgMs+8364L3NCekl5YaXArJ993Yi87uGfM4WLSoxAw5zrRw9EQgPldsZkNb3mfbkr+Nb6RQlkkjI3kXiG0jGmsnOX+j9SH71lyJva7OsUqWYvP1GNx4ME1r2N9dPOlcATEKcrajjsmMJomC2Qw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=ZjREGlHGS7Rl34DJZhJb9KYRWYTRnVsBR40iiV6JMX4=; b=ZGLrtNWRqZlkhqFYFBZoP/X0hjTiOXs8Cnm4YfJVkHqscy4RbR7c6byLtmX4luLWiZ3bG935SFFqwC4jtixWZknZFXh0o305WZXGMa8AG+9F3jo15crIsgENqF3bMlIP3Jr05Fj7wz/B9yjtdTzJ96slLaN9aC8m/fKHEXDvqY9qWlRXUWzUm6Kmb8a24xN80jBCHcZ3qWLotIibAepFi6DYz9nJ7m0j1omPwFCpEDpeG/y3qobooxwbt6X6gNOo4fXNWit1sXjC44IuMLsdhvic6qZPe294vRut1FzO8k4mpaAGQWkghz0EQsMeYzuxhP3EmQ1ccwh4VfwgT63WHQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=uoguelph.ca; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=uoguelph.ca; dkim=pass header.d=uoguelph.ca; arc=none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=uoguelph.ca; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=ZjREGlHGS7Rl34DJZhJb9KYRWYTRnVsBR40iiV6JMX4=; b=bc530vWbHixaW81Bi865ZsTV7J3cnYWLy3GmoUSjtFLkIagcSXB/ekN+TKgvXXJK9KLLE59NRylecKSE4BYwJAlCophrWUXl5ZPXQfnqTWEbmR9dUdZD8KfY8UVP30Ob/FTjPqyld6974jrQnl+BED4jD5GU4iq/1iOrX5/rQPbqa/73JDnzXalJ/LIL7yRhPfdgRe4x9/AyG8xpQxyELJS0B5XAbmwOXAr0QJjYMvNxIv3dKs5n09zqLLWPTHyun8FYSHt9JYehjAbJl+g70dyih2F3vRnYN64gkER/qjvVH4e18gsxluN9iocHCoicQoQZFJZINnaKkqJdeXiCNw== Received: from QB1PR01MB3364.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (2603:10b6:c00:38::14) by QB1PR01MB3042.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (2603:10b6:c00:33::32) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3109.22; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 15:50:37 +0000 Received: from QB1PR01MB3364.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM ([fe80::60f3:4ca2:8a4a:1e91]) by QB1PR01MB3364.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM ([fe80::60f3:4ca2:8a4a:1e91%7]) with mapi id 15.20.3109.027; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 15:50:29 +0000 From: Rick Macklem To: Norman Gray , "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: nfsuserd in a jail Thread-Topic: nfsuserd in a jail Thread-Index: AQHWSKaK83sM7o15HEOjc+gnyS8H06jkxwIX Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 15:50:28 +0000 Message-ID: References: <962F77B1-8038-452E-92E5-9A1006424C7A@glasgow.ac.uk> In-Reply-To: <962F77B1-8038-452E-92E5-9A1006424C7A@glasgow.ac.uk> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-ms-publictraffictype: Email x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 165a0755-fc3b-4657-1db0-08d816c3fcf1 x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: QB1PR01MB3042: x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:4502; x-forefront-prvs: 0442E569BC x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1 x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: uP34qIXdxsA/AQ5hdMbt4wxuzj9eU8uKyHpctwEcKhq7MGwoaGcxB4nCFZeu6687Amn/8P+G3WPUMcRFYxIErfylI4v2hSN7L08MsaG0uP1GJXwP4Dmk7gjcsLUcnAtbpvARmeA8OoN0Sk3pXemzawwjufWYk9Sib+f7NHi66zc/jmkkc5SPQxK2Hf+/Iuc/f9DyVtW02XTctRY3Bs5o92CojpyijfqfQK3SkhNxGFeN7VVTt6fh65opmVJdlnP2DRfymApS/0I2obshFTF/RcXtYeMPHx7Rgu3Bivd7KcUaWGIuH1pNS4hteUH5+wBuQRL04ltxoYqKh5EP0sLMvh951zuGUtTR00mS+UH059UFcQyVUY//Ta6waO+3+tzxle+ivwANDNtTitwGXp1kpQ== x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:QB1PR01MB3364.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFTY:; SFS:(136003)(366004)(396003)(39860400002)(376002)(346002)(8936002)(5660300002)(110136005)(2906002)(8676002)(9686003)(55016002)(83380400001)(66556008)(66476007)(66946007)(64756008)(478600001)(186003)(966005)(33656002)(76116006)(86362001)(7696005)(71200400001)(52536014)(66446008)(3480700007)(6506007)(316002)(786003); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: 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 x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-2022-jp" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: uoguelph.ca X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 165a0755-fc3b-4657-1db0-08d816c3fcf1 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 22 Jun 2020 15:50:28.9340 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: be62a12b-2cad-49a1-a5fa-85f4f3156a7d X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: Qrn/5u0jXRQLq5q7x2aNF/e1V/SVQKt0T5pmOe5cxiQFF4joDMWMmKC8rCbYblE3xZ/dq43jsht1Z55T0/gT8Q== X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: QB1PR01MB3042 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49rDQS4PZPz3XgB X-Spamd-Bar: ----- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=uoguelph.ca header.s=selector1 header.b=bc530vWb; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of rmacklem@uoguelph.ca designates 2a01:111:f400:fe5c::613 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=rmacklem@uoguelph.ca X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-5.55 / 15.00]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.93)[-0.930]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[uoguelph.ca:s=selector1]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a01:111:f400::/48]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.99)[-0.994]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[uoguelph.ca]; DWL_DNSWL_LOW(-1.00)[uoguelph.ca:dkim]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[uoguelph.ca:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.13)[-1.128]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:8075, ipnet:2a01:111:f000::/36, country:US]; ARC_ALLOW(-1.00)[microsoft.com:s=arcselector9901:i=1] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 15:50:41 -0000 Norman Gray wrote:=0A= >There is a 'fixed' bug [1] referring to problems that nfsuserd has, when= =0A= >working in a jail.=0A= >=0A= >This appears to explain a problem I'm having getting nfsuserd running=0A= >within a jail on a 12.0-RELEASE machine (which I'm aware is now EoL,=0A= >since we're beyond 12.1-RELEASE + 3 months).=0A= >=0A= >The BUGS section in the nfsuserd manpage does mention this bug, which=0A= >(based on the last few comments in that ticket) confirms that the fix=0A= >isn't present in the version I'm running.=0A= >=0A= >The last comment (dated 2019-04-21) mentions=0A= >=0A= >Flags: mfc-stable12? =1B$B"*=1B(B mfc-stable12+=0A= >Flags: mfc-stable11? =1B$B"*=1B(B mfc-stable11+=0A= >Flags: mfc-stable10? =1B$B"*=1B(B mfc-stable10+=0A= >=0A= >Could someone expand on the status of this for me? Does this mean that=0A= >these fixes _are_ in 12.1 (so that nfsuserd should work on that)? If=0A= >so, how could I work that out for myself?=0A= Yes.=0A= =0A= To look to see if this is the case, I go onto=0A= svnweb.freebsd.org=0A= and then look at the commit log for the program (nfsuserd.c in this case)= =0A= within the bae/release/12.1.0 branch.=0A= =0A= rick=0A= =0A= (I've been putting off updating that machine, but this may promote the=0A= task to not-optional).=0A= =0A= Best wishes,=0A= =0A= Norman=0A= =0A= =0A= [1] https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D205193=0A= =0A= --=0A= Norman Gray : http://www.astro.gla.ac.uk/users/norman/it/=0A= Research IT Coordinator : School of Physics and Astronomy=0A= // My current template week for IT tasks is: Monday, Tuesday, and Friday=0A= _______________________________________________=0A= freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list=0A= https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net=0A= To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"=0A= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Mon Jun 22 15:53:39 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 545CD330BD4 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 15:53:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rmacklem@uoguelph.ca) Received: from CAN01-TO1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-to1can01on061a.outbound.protection.outlook.com [IPv6:2a01:111:f400:fe5d::61a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.protection.outlook.com", Issuer "GlobalSign Organization Validation CA - SHA256 - G3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49rDTt3mmhz3XwF for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 15:53:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rmacklem@uoguelph.ca) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=ZtGb1BWMODNFu2to+pIV+M+DTaDIivvOqu0fjhjZQ+ApbZ4gxiNxQJf2Y8IaAhzpge1QslpBgXmvpmPRA/W+tl9dHoSVNDRa5ayUv6JNNpZ13vnuFQngvpWQekx/ko8bDsVez9lyvkmUZ87zlRn2tAVzbXLGsBy2TzrHwAcUixpm3OM4hoM7gF2Mc1DUSZYqI0OVu3hthS/6uBUF7kROAYN6vQGSrwbNCAQ2iCU7SnpqsDj5hZ4hBMF0s0AJ+kIkF23ptKs2yadISg2yQzATPXsJ6j5yLtByhOp7+iqkO0WnwHfN06wu+pHEOC5sZQE16YWoAP3ld2e03y4b5mVo5A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=iBcsAzyWzEeZKu1dU4tIgkVNBOqTPpjl0gNmPXxfRxA=; b=Sq91tfVqqeVQazgn07csw5ZULQm94CjCXusuQAEZl2jCuYvQ6tz+jZMl+MZybgfu30VTBK/AzBrEe1JpbkjzAiUtTjJtPhWigpT1e8GCbrkRtpOZBYt4ynqKh7EsR/5SalusJ4XpbyB1R0jzNDnGts4sGzUgcnLwjuHY3W3PEUTSeKCdXrFA/7YbTn/VohmKxuRARUGfaiCfFvFGV/rDbNwV+Zt07NG2IMIUZjLQ+o9+osQAazaV+ZKCWSzEFBldP/ESr79U4AJOJyp6VJYM1yzaNvLv3KXYkYbZWNUmnPfJXHOIg87Vl5Ebh3jcQ5H3yjVEIHlbGvbDKeIG+bAneQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=uoguelph.ca; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=uoguelph.ca; dkim=pass header.d=uoguelph.ca; arc=none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=uoguelph.ca; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=iBcsAzyWzEeZKu1dU4tIgkVNBOqTPpjl0gNmPXxfRxA=; b=JqhlPf/dUV2XM7tuinyVoLArneZiLy1vtEoZRY0Qk3kzri18tnt5ftZ0QGJyPBvbHY065Ncj85NmXdHvRfElutJeAstTT/eRPBvsGG1sOlVDDPu1eER2C3A4A4+mZKYufsDmklniRXVMwD7OP0X0DpF5gnm6+GSpU90Rf/TZmKUeWUuQTpdQPzzSCYXhVbP/KsdAQkGSZZazAfFxYnNDCbHS2OQFYgjnDNbCvGzyu6c1puuK1blTvwZIVfhGLncOxUIQi+R6Bef9VXi3Amg8GOlHHpRBvKC3gavLd3KPbrcNNFv8smf+kn1YvZzlbQauityf+reRtd7rWNVnmVi11Q== Received: from QB1PR01MB3364.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (2603:10b6:c00:38::14) by QB1PR01MB2804.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (2603:10b6:c00:37::15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3109.22; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 15:53:36 +0000 Received: from QB1PR01MB3364.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM ([fe80::60f3:4ca2:8a4a:1e91]) by QB1PR01MB3364.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM ([fe80::60f3:4ca2:8a4a:1e91%7]) with mapi id 15.20.3109.027; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 15:53:36 +0000 From: Rick Macklem To: Norman Gray , "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: nfsuserd in a jail Thread-Topic: nfsuserd in a jail Thread-Index: AQHWSKaK83sM7o15HEOjc+gnyS8H06jkxwIXgAAB9DM= Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 15:53:36 +0000 Message-ID: References: <962F77B1-8038-452E-92E5-9A1006424C7A@glasgow.ac.uk>, In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-ms-publictraffictype: Email x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 4452373b-1597-48a8-116d-08d816c46c71 x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: QB1PR01MB2804: x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:4502; x-forefront-prvs: 0442E569BC x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1 x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: mxl0SG53p7Ag32QnXP5ti899XqV4Q8OHReX+SpUoNlXz9aWS6EieAxsOeJ7bBzO2nuqw9znzr0NbxJnAEBGK3H/ssnDov7xLxEgMfKgVjkPt2k+eZTWnOetDIsQr6TNR9iTQYAqLzFVfgRHekirRgXlqXBJPVJtcI/EOq9DO8MhQMy4F7t8/Wxl6SW0+XgiL1bqAkjdWEKxwi60wRdXufxw/VVFs9l6j7wptytP3LYoKwtDPLfCN36I6X7/iHZeQKKJPfOKG8pJ6JnFoDeEPCgQe42z532hJiCzRU3IzBpLlfmZeGZGjF+F1lHXnuua8Idu8w7OZ7FZ8Qrgkxnl672gfpnuZVqtwlUCrDgVuh8aAQpfnmvtApEi18JCGD3F43KOObC22JkIppvjp9CrqEw== x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:QB1PR01MB3364.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFTY:; SFS:(376002)(346002)(136003)(366004)(396003)(39860400002)(86362001)(8936002)(52536014)(5660300002)(8676002)(71200400001)(64756008)(66446008)(66476007)(83380400001)(66556008)(33656002)(76116006)(66946007)(6506007)(186003)(966005)(9686003)(55016002)(2906002)(478600001)(3480700007)(110136005)(786003)(316002)(7696005)(2940100002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: 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 x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-2022-jp" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: uoguelph.ca X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 4452373b-1597-48a8-116d-08d816c46c71 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 22 Jun 2020 15:53:36.0966 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: be62a12b-2cad-49a1-a5fa-85f4f3156a7d X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: cmRt3BA9GmsFrVaJ5rDe3rryoDwtVyGWiUdLSReR3dc+yWvkGQyhkEURepCgr2RVTrUKV7ZLLLbmLGj2c50bFQ== X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: QB1PR01MB2804 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49rDTt3mmhz3XwF X-Spamd-Bar: ----- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=uoguelph.ca header.s=selector1 header.b=JqhlPf/d; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of rmacklem@uoguelph.ca designates 2a01:111:f400:fe5d::61a as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=rmacklem@uoguelph.ca X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-5.55 / 15.00]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.93)[-0.929]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[uoguelph.ca:s=selector1]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a01:111:f400::/48:c]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.99)[-0.994]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[uoguelph.ca]; DWL_DNSWL_LOW(-1.00)[uoguelph.ca:dkim]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[uoguelph.ca:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.13)[-1.127]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:8075, ipnet:2a01:111:f000::/36, country:US]; ARC_ALLOW(-1.00)[microsoft.com:s=arcselector9901:i=1] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 15:53:39 -0000 Norman Gray wrote:=0A= >There is a 'fixed' bug [1] referring to problems that nfsuserd has, when= =0A= >working in a jail.=0A= >=0A= >This appears to explain a problem I'm having getting nfsuserd running=0A= >within a jail on a 12.0-RELEASE machine (which I'm aware is now EoL,=0A= >since we're beyond 12.1-RELEASE + 3 months).=0A= >=0A= >The BUGS section in the nfsuserd manpage does mention this bug, which=0A= >(based on the last few comments in that ticket) confirms that the fix=0A= >isn't present in the version I'm running.=0A= >=0A= >The last comment (dated 2019-04-21) mentions=0A= >=0A= >Flags: mfc-stable12? =1B$B"*=1B(B mfc-stable12+=0A= >Flags: mfc-stable11? =1B$B"*=1B(B mfc-stable11+=0A= >Flags: mfc-stable10? =1B$B"*=1B(B mfc-stable10+=0A= >=0A= >Could someone expand on the status of this for me? Does this mean that=0A= >these fixes _are_ in 12.1 (so that nfsuserd should work on that)? If=0A= >so, how could I work that out for myself?=0A= Yes.=0A= (As in, yes it is in 12.1.)=0A= =0A= To look to see if this is the case, I go onto=0A= svnweb.freebsd.org=0A= and then look at the commit log for the program (nfsuserd.c in this case)= =0A= within the bae/release/12.1.0 branch.=0A= (that's base/release/12.1.0, not bae/=1B$B!D=1B(B)=0A= =0A= rick=0A= =0A= (I've been putting off updating that machine, but this may promote the=0A= task to not-optional).=0A= =0A= Best wishes,=0A= =0A= Norman=0A= =0A= =0A= [1] https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D205193=0A= =0A= --=0A= Norman Gray : http://www.astro.gla.ac.uk/users/norman/it/=0A= Research IT Coordinator : School of Physics and Astronomy=0A= // My current template week for IT tasks is: Monday, Tuesday, and Friday=0A= _______________________________________________=0A= freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list=0A= https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net=0A= To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"=0A= _______________________________________________=0A= freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list=0A= https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net=0A= To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"=0A= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Mon Jun 22 16:04:15 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77A7E33135D for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 16:04:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49rDk72fwdz3YPZ for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 16:04:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 5B44C33135C; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 16:04:15 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B0E93310E4 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 16:04:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49rDk71rZ3z3YFG for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 16:04:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3ACE1106FF for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 16:04:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 05MG4FFe099053 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 16:04:15 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 05MG4FwY099052 for net@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 16:04:15 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 238324] Add XG-C100C/AQtion AQC107 10GbE NIC driver Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 16:04:13 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: feature, needs-patch X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: matti.viljanen@kapsi.fi X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: mfc-stable12? mfc-stable11? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 16:04:15 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D238324 Matti Viljanen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |matti.viljanen@kapsi.fi --- Comment #10 from Matti Viljanen --- The driver in GitHub has now updated to v0.0.5[1], but the driver that can = be downloaded from the manufacturer website still has only v0.0.2. [1] https://github.com/Aquantia/aqtion-freebsd/archive/v0.0.5.zip --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Mon Jun 22 16:07:50 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDADF3316F7 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 16:07:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49rDpF5fVgz3Zf0 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 16:07:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 414D93317E5; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 16:07:45 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 350433318C8 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 16:07:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49rDp668v6z3ZSM for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 16:07:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2FABF10E86 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 16:07:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 05MG7bIA001559 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 16:07:37 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 05MG7b2b001558 for net@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 16:07:37 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 206567] [msk] msk0: watchdog timeout - 88E8053 on i386 Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 16:07:37 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 9.3-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 16:07:50 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D206567 --- Comment #14 from Tom Lane --- FTR, I've now had three months of trouble-free uptime on that machine, using hw.msk.msi_disable=3D"1" in /boot/loader.conf. I have not had the time to = try Chris' more complex fix. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Mon Jun 22 16:13:52 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18B3C3320ED for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 16:13:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49rDxC40sqz3fZS for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 16:13:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 348463321D4; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 16:13:48 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29578332306 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 16:13:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49rDx60pYtz3fJh for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 16:13:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B563C11106 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 16:13:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 05MGDhuI010014 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 16:13:43 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 05MGDhQe010013 for net@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 16:13:43 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 238324] Add XG-C100C/AQtion AQC107 10GbE NIC driver Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 16:13:43 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: feature, needs-patch X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: jmallett@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: mfc-stable12? mfc-stable11? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 16:13:52 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D238324 Juli Mallett changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jmallett@FreeBSD.org --- Comment #11 from Juli Mallett --- What is standing in the way of this coming to base? I have only skimmed the driver and don't have a clear sense of if it has any quality issues. I know that this NIC is extremely popular in home and small business deployments d= ue to its low price and wide availability. While it may not be an enduring presence in the 10GbE space, it's definitely relevant in the present moment, and if there's any way I can help, I'd like to. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Mon Jun 22 18:13:16 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5B2B336208 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 18:13:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Norman.Gray@glasgow.ac.uk) Received: from plockton.cent.gla.ac.uk (plockton.cent.gla.ac.uk [130.209.16.75]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49rHZz44cCz47SG for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 18:13:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Norman.Gray@glasgow.ac.uk) Received: from cas07.campus.gla.ac.uk ([130.209.14.164]) by plockton.cent.gla.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1jnQwS-00046h-Gr; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 19:13:12 +0100 Received: from cas07.campus.gla.ac.uk (130.209.14.164) by cas07.campus.gla.ac.uk (130.209.14.164) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 19:13:12 +0100 Received: from GBR01-LO2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (104.47.21.51) by cas07.campus.gla.ac.uk (130.209.14.164) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 19:13:12 +0100 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=TfdNfePC6qVBY6Km4kLgZS9mXCDDMbukyBGwQlRMZ6rX1rZmYvGahR5+TO/20sRtK9X+0MQOhWgpivplYI+nAa0ysWO95WT9cEy27XtCj68ByYVjmqxgEF6g63DFFFeEIsXegMXiugHUnqo4i2zErnBMiTzD5zklIZ1liBd5+Ud60b0WABqbreqMMbiQU2Pcy2qhU9vFFN4MufD6DcX/gswecb0TUdVRdWHZG0OdVyYSFthAjvDNS51VxPceF+tbQaM4TapyYGl08ZpuBFlkCKFY4T7/r1AJ6OdnCF1FSlbM5ImBochb7fmMiIngQYGnloHAYlOljpbSdXOUpYkXHA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=HpijINLqCcspqBDy/CGRsObaT3vV9WwB8kDH75P3DG8=; b=M6xrj2j2AeSAzahlsFLgrRrT2D+0hgpnWRuAbQv6apua/KDBUu9kCi1FWBs0aRag98peIhTsCyq8ejDLdD6XW93kSl/aU4Etn7cvnc3Vv/eP08RsUr1VikJT9wAAeo9EI74JCLyvMBcUjOLnOWYIh/W8crdBFW0Pk8zNMym2rD5De1Fdhn/KEMxTJT+2T1g+m8VhVkWrpPdhRJuzY6uUyajCaourcoaI0t+Gd1ZyetfQ8J12Per0MNsuIwD0zD9fq8BQZwKLzz7zoRx2xlLFiO1wF4gsUWh7m2SSZvP1WUqCLja7SSDwWd7a9tYR0SV+GQ/kYpwgebxvPiF0VuOcNw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=glasgow.ac.uk; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=glasgow.ac.uk; dkim=pass header.d=glasgow.ac.uk; arc=none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gla.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-gla-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=HpijINLqCcspqBDy/CGRsObaT3vV9WwB8kDH75P3DG8=; b=V9FoWWVZTmhnJkFKZs7kHXQsON/vbTyTLSqsUXMbxN3TkPqCi8LzmgWtVrjTdYkU20uDMaJ10ufuhIRmxI2LaHVbX95EQHgK/e3mxpqjqxrdSsTMTKR634C+dH7meK1L+k8K9gibHadaeNErAcz524kDqzxXJbCktGX6ap0Jb3U= Received: from CWXP265MB0149.GBRP265.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (2603:10a6:401:8::19) by CWXP265MB2069.GBRP265.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (2603:10a6:400:7d::13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3109.22; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 18:13:11 +0000 Received: from CWXP265MB0149.GBRP265.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM ([fe80::3819:6bd1:5e65:56b7]) by CWXP265MB0149.GBRP265.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM ([fe80::3819:6bd1:5e65:56b7%5]) with mapi id 15.20.3109.027; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 18:13:11 +0000 From: "Norman Gray" To: Rick Macklem CC: Subject: Re: nfsuserd in a jail Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 19:13:10 +0100 X-Mailer: MailMate (1.13.1r5671) Message-ID: <7F30909C-B89E-4D4B-9694-D80538A69B06@glasgow.ac.uk> In-Reply-To: References: <962F77B1-8038-452E-92E5-9A1006424C7A@glasgow.ac.uk> Content-Type: text/plain X-ClientProxiedBy: LO2P265CA0002.GBRP265.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (2603:10a6:600:62::14) To CWXP265MB0149.GBRP265.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (2603:10a6:401:8::19) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MS-Exchange-MessageSentRepresentingType: 1 Received: from [130.209.33.192] (81.2.70.164) by LO2P265CA0002.GBRP265.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (2603:10a6:600:62::14) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3109.21 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 18:13:11 +0000 X-Mailer: MailMate (1.13.1r5671) X-Originating-IP: [81.2.70.164] X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: dacde35a-73e0-48e8-93c5-08d816d7ec62 X-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: CWXP265MB2069: X-MS-Exchange-Transport-Forked: True X-Microsoft-Antispam-PRVS: X-MS-Oob-TLC-OOBClassifiers: OLM:5516; X-Forefront-PRVS: 0442E569BC X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck: 1 X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0; X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info: 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 X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:CWXP265MB0149.GBRP265.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFTY:; SFS:(366004)(136003)(396003)(39860400002)(376002)(346002)(16576012)(26005)(36756003)(4744005)(786003)(4326008)(6706004)(5660300002)(296002)(478600001)(316002)(53546011)(186003)(16526019)(6916009)(66946007)(2616005)(52116002)(33656002)(2906002)(956004)(86362001)(8676002)(66556008)(66476007)(966005)(3480700007)(8936002)(6486002)(78286006)(15302535012); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData: czx30goSmgR8qrnU3hi9TYTH/mbo+WeJoHavMjhjHp1R7FTuzZfTP/T0ptWv8/gwhHe3sfAaa9HI9V+rO0LSG0yvOTocFj5HgYjg1QPzqv1tyt0Opn2sqvO0d29vQ/8rKLf+ZCiBxDjoVeC9spLQQlUusrKubytiiq1W3IHhnssNWMxS9WvJXFuXCksRzkK25FZa8YTyGdwwPa27caAq3ovVcIHJ98MfIZl/M2/TSsU6PGLKGKznFFxcDemeEhQFyMHGmcGymf/wWD1uyE0UJfObfAL5pORBwWTOsqvyF7M35+gjX2vk2kzHNRel9UIwsZTuCIkCAVrabeOuHvOP1QrLBZXHEUeSzU6bY0Vsccd68UrxTCyT89KRnXpVzJz+cSaiK+9qndBty3xqlp9HWR1yF765OtMr9KPjktnQNbxWBcY3dJOFzNpAeJfcUz1z/eCNxq7FGN6J/rzpZfTpuuqo9sCgZ83YGJJ3Etya44E= X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: dacde35a-73e0-48e8-93c5-08d816d7ec62 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Jun 2020 18:13:11.4367 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 6e725c29-763a-4f50-81f2-2e254f0133c8 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-MailboxType: HOSTED X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-UserPrincipalName: ZZVVC4mPazTNTMlH9vBsv5zivMzR9W1WLVEDB0PDWZblWC0ABm0s67NF19rWF4oQE32ByE7w9I7wsDnoPavX9U6q3tpg3IQVmssMWQkYVQ8= X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: CWXP265MB2069 X-OriginatorOrg: glasgow.ac.uk X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49rHZz44cCz47SG X-Spamd-Bar: ----- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gla.onmicrosoft.com header.s=selector2-gla-onmicrosoft-com header.b=V9FoWWVZ; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of Norman.Gray@glasgow.ac.uk has no SPF policy when checking 130.209.16.75) smtp.mailfrom=Norman.Gray@glasgow.ac.uk X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-5.27 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.97)[-0.966]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gla.onmicrosoft.com:s=selector2-gla-onmicrosoft-com]; HAS_XOIP(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_GOOD(0.00)[130.209.16.75:from]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.03)[-1.028]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[glasgow.ac.uk]; RCVD_DKIM_ARC_DNSWL_MED(-0.50)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED(-0.20)[130.209.16.75:from]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gla.onmicrosoft.com:+]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.27)[-1.272]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:786, ipnet:130.209.0.0/16, country:GB]; RCVD_COUNT_SEVEN(0.00)[7]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; ARC_ALLOW(-1.00)[microsoft.com:s=arcselector9901:i=1] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 18:13:16 -0000 Rick, hello. On 22 Jun 2020, at 16:53, Rick Macklem wrote: > Yes. > (As in, yes it is in 12.1.) Thanks (downtime beckons...!) Best wishes, Norman -- Norman Gray : http://www.astro.gla.ac.uk/users/norman/it/ Research IT Coordinator SUPA School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Glasgow, UK Charity number SC004401 From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Mon Jun 22 19:26:22 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B739C338BF9 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 19:26:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49rKCL3qgxz4Fv9 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 19:26:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 81ABD338BF7; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 19:26:22 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8117B338ADF; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 19:26:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net) Received: from gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (br1.CN84in.dnsmgr.net [69.59.192.140]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49rKCK628rz4FbH; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 19:26:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net) Received: from gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id 05MJQJug011868; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 12:26:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net) Received: (from freebsd-rwg@localhost) by gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id 05MJQJwC011867; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 12:26:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg) From: "Rodney W. Grimes" Message-Id: <202006221926.05MJQJwC011867@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> Subject: Re: routed && route6d removal proposal In-Reply-To: <960ce7d8-f964-a686-dd79-242145b3ae5c@grosbein.net> To: Eugene Grosbein Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 12:26:19 -0700 (PDT) CC: "Rodney W. Grimes" , "Alexander V. Chernikov" , "current@FreeBSD.org" , net , freebsd-hackers X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL121h (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49rKCK628rz4FbH X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of freebsd-rwg@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net has no SPF policy when checking 69.59.192.140) smtp.mailfrom=freebsd-rwg@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.73 / 15.00]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_SOME(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.13)[-0.134]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.16)[0.162]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.20)[-0.197]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[dnsmgr.net]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[6]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:13868, ipnet:69.59.192.0/19, country:US]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 19:26:22 -0000 > 22.06.2020 19:49, Rodney W. Grimes wrote: > > > Whats unmaintained about code that has no need to change cause it just pretty much works? > > Have you actually tried running routed(8) as base for real network with loops, > mix of p2p and ethernet-like interfaces, IPv4 aliases, need of offset-lists and > with diameter about 6 hops? As I said I know of people that are running and it is working, and Hiroko's post clearly establishes that as fact in evidence. I am not even sure that RIP* has loop detection in the protocol, as the prefered routing protocol for anything multipath (which is what loops are in effect) is OSPF. > > I'm not talking about RIPv2 inherent deficiencies. > Our routed just glitches where quagga's ripd just works. And your PR# for reporting the bug is? -- Rod Grimes rgrimes@freebsd.org From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Mon Jun 22 20:33:17 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAF6733B49F for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 20:33:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49rLhY490dz4NXB for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 20:33:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 8BA8433B686; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 20:33:17 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B13933B49C; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 20:33:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Received: from hz.grosbein.net (hz.grosbein.net [IPv6:2a01:4f8:c2c:26d8::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "hz.grosbein.net", Issuer "hz.grosbein.net" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49rLhX3mrGz4NnR; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 20:33:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Received: from eg.sd.rdtc.ru (eg.sd.rdtc.ru [IPv6:2a03:3100:c:13:0:0:0:5]) by hz.grosbein.net (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 05MKXBts016615 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 22 Jun 2020 20:33:11 GMT (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) X-Envelope-From: eugen@grosbein.net X-Envelope-To: freebsd-rwg@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net Received: from [10.58.0.10] (dadvw [10.58.0.10]) by eg.sd.rdtc.ru (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 05MKX6fl035520 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Tue, 23 Jun 2020 03:33:06 +0700 (+07) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Subject: Re: routed && route6d removal proposal To: "Rodney W. Grimes" References: <202006221926.05MJQJwC011867@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> Cc: "current@FreeBSD.org" , net , freebsd-hackers From: Eugene Grosbein Message-ID: <33c892bf-5d71-cd65-3041-449cc1bf6e6b@grosbein.net> Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 03:33:00 +0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <202006221926.05MJQJwC011867@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,LOCAL_FROM, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Report: * -2.3 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record * -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record * 2.6 LOCAL_FROM From my domains X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on hz.grosbein.net X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49rLhX3mrGz4NnR X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=permerror (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of eugen@grosbein.net uses mechanism not recognized by this client) smtp.mailfrom=eugen@grosbein.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.81 / 15.00]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_SOME(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.90)[-0.901]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.90)[-0.900]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[grosbein.net]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.09)[0.089]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_PERMFAIL(0.00)[empty SPF record]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:2a01:4f8::/29, country:DE]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 20:33:18 -0000 23.06.2020 2:26, Rodney W. Grimes wrote: >> 22.06.2020 19:49, Rodney W. Grimes wrote: >>> Whats unmaintained about code that has no need to change cause it just pretty much works? >> Have you actually tried running routed(8) as base for real network with loops, >> mix of p2p and ethernet-like interfaces, IPv4 aliases, need of offset-lists and >> with diameter about 6 hops? > > As I said I know of people that are running and it is working, and > Hiroko's post clearly establishes that as fact in evidence. > > I am not even sure that RIP* has loop detection in the protocol, It has, of course. > as the prefered routing protocol for anything multipath (which > is what loops are in effect) is OSPF. RIPv2 may be used for failover, not for multipath. Any redundant route creates L3 "multipath". >> I'm not talking about RIPv2 inherent deficiencies. >> Our routed just glitches where quagga's ripd just works. > > And your PR# for reporting the bug is? Was. https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51927 Never had a chance to verify if it was really fixed in HEAD because it was not for RELENG_4, so I moved to ripd. As you may remeber, RELENG_5 needed much time to become ready for production. From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Mon Jun 22 22:13:38 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C59DB33E16B for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 22:13:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49rNwL4xNBz4Vl5 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 22:13:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id A74E633E423; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 22:13:38 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A718233E16A for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 22:13:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49rNwL417Fz4VR4 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 22:13:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8529C1578A for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 22:13:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 05MMDc8q088014 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 22:13:38 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 05MMDcog088013 for net@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 22:13:38 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 238324] Add XG-C100C/AQtion AQC107 10GbE NIC driver Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 22:13:37 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: feature, needs-patch X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: freqlabs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: mfc-stable12? mfc-stable11? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 22:13:38 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D238324 Ryan Moeller changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |freqlabs@FreeBSD.org --- Comment #12 from Ryan Moeller --- (In reply to Juli Mallett from comment #11) The driver is still in development, and progress appears to be slow. If you have the hardware, testing the code and reporting your findings would be a = good place to start. The developers also seem receptive to contributions on gith= ub. Based on my own testing I would agree with the label "development preview" = they have on their github repo. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Mon Jun 22 22:16:16 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED92F33E59D for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 22:16:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49rNzN65d2z4Vfv for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 22:16:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id CF8C133E441; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 22:16:16 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF52333E2CD for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 22:16:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49rNzN5BfTz4Vcx for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 22:16:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ADDA715807 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 22:16:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 05MMGGft090128 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 22:16:16 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 05MMGGoF090127 for net@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 22:16:16 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 238324] Add XG-C100C/AQtion AQC107 10GbE NIC driver Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 22:16:15 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: feature, needs-patch X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: vi@endrift.com X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: mfc-stable12? mfc-stable11? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 22:16:17 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D238324 --- Comment #13 from vi@endrift.com --- I have this NIC on my motherboard but have been too afraid to test it, thou= gh I do intend to sometime soon. I have a 10 Gbit switch for it too, but I don't have any 10 Gbit hardware to put on the other end (yet). --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Jun 23 03:21:07 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5712D346920 for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 03:21:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daemon-user@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49rWl71Czwz3c1w; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 03:21:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daemon-user@freebsd.org) Received: from reviews.nyi.freebsd.org (reviews.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:607c::16:b]) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0F8D19654; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 03:21:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daemon-user@freebsd.org) Received: by reviews.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1346) id F00E35E4252; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 03:21:06 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 03:21:06 +0000 To: Phabricator From: "neel_neelc.org (Neel Chauhan)" Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Reply-to: "neel_neelc.org (Neel Chauhan)" Subject: [Differential] D24937: Add readonly tunable net.iflib.tx_update_freq to set transmit descriptor update frequency Message-ID: X-Priority: 3 X-Phabricator-Sent-This-Message: Yes X-Mail-Transport-Agent: MetaMTA X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-Phabricator-Mail-Tags: , , , X-Herald-Rules: <28>, <81>, <89>, <128>, <67>, <118>, <110> X-Phabricator-Projects: <#network> X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: Precedence: bulk Thread-Topic: PHID-DREV-sjntqne4ry32ikjhkxqq X-Phabricator-Mail-ID: 2009338 X-Phabricator-Send-Attempt: u42uj6r4jao7ey3y In-Reply-To: References: Thread-Index: Yzk3NzA0OWVmYTYyZDNhMjkzN2NhZDQyMjkyIF7xdSI= X-Phabricator-Stamps: actor(@neel_neelc.org) application(Differential) author(@neel_neelc.org) blocking-reviewer(#iflib) herald(H28) herald(H67) herald(H81) herald(H89) herald(H110) herald(H118) herald(H128) monogram(D24937) object-type(DREV) phid(PHID-DREV-sjntqne4ry32ikjhkxqq) reviewer(#iflib) reviewer(@shurd) revision-repository(rS) revision-status(needs-review) subscriber(#contributor_reviews_base) subscriber(@ae) subscriber(@freebsd-net-list) subscriber(@imp) subscriber(@melifaro) tag(#network) via(web) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="b1_f3d446f21cd6c2efd95244a286c217f0" X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 03:21:07 -0000 --b1_f3d446f21cd6c2efd95244a286c217f0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset = "utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 bmVlbF9uZWVsYy5vcmcgY3JlYXRlZCB0aGlzIHJldmlzaW9uLgpuZWVsX25lZWxjLm9yZyBhZGRl ZCBhIHByb2plY3Q6IG5ldHdvcmsuCkhlcmFsZCBhZGRlZCBzdWJzY3JpYmVyczogQ29udHJpYnV0 b3IgUmV2aWV3cyAoYmFzZSksIG1lbGlmYXJvLCBhZSwgaW1wLgpIZXJhbGQgYWRkZWQgYSByZXZp ZXdlcjogc2h1cmQuCkhlcmFsZCBhZGRlZCBhIHJldmlld2VyOiBpZmxpYi4KbmVlbF9uZWVsYy5v cmcgcmVxdWVzdGVkIHJldmlldyBvZiB0aGlzIHJldmlzaW9uLgoKUkVWSVNJT04gU1VNTUFSWQog IEludHJvZHVjZSByZWFkb25seSB0dW5hYmxlIG5ldC5pZmxpYi50eF91cGRhdGVfZnJlcSB0byBh bGxvdyBhbiB1c2VyIHRvIHNldCB0aGUgbmV0d29yayB0cmFuc21pdCBkZXNjcmlwdG9yIHVwZGF0 ZSBmcmVxdWVuY3kuIFByZXZpb3VzbHksIHRoaXMgd2FzIGhhcmRjb2RlZCBhdCAxNi4KICAKICBT dWJtaXR0ZWQgYnk6IE5lZWwgQ2hhdWhhbiA8bmVlbCBBVCBuZWVsYyBET1Qgb3JnPgoKVEVTVCBQ TEFOCiAgQWRkIHRoaXMgdG8gL2Jvb3QvbG9hZGVyLmNvbmY6CiAgCiAgbmV0LmlmbGliLnR4X3Vw ZGF0ZV9mcmVxPTMyCiAgCiAgUmVib290IHRvIHNlZSBpZiBpdCB3b3JrcwoKUkVQT1NJVE9SWQog IHJTIEZyZWVCU0Qgc3JjIHJlcG9zaXRvcnkKClJFVklTSU9OIERFVEFJTAogIGh0dHBzOi8vcmV2 aWV3cy5mcmVlYnNkLm9yZy9EMjQ5MzcKCkFGRkVDVEVEIEZJTEVTCiAgc3lzL25ldC9pZmxpYi5j CgpDSEFOR0UgREVUQUlMUwoKZGlmZiAtLWdpdCBhL3N5cy9uZXQvaWZsaWIuYyBiL3N5cy9uZXQv aWZsaWIuYwotLS0gYS9zeXMvbmV0L2lmbGliLmMKKysrIGIvc3lzL25ldC9pZmxpYi5jCkBAIC01 ODYsOCArNTg2LDExIEBACiBzdGF0aWMgaW50IGlmbGliX25vX3R4X2JhdGNoID0gMDsKIFNZU0NU TF9JTlQoX25ldF9pZmxpYiwgT0lEX0FVVE8sIG5vX3R4X2JhdGNoLCBDVExGTEFHX1JXLAogCQkg ICAmaWZsaWJfbm9fdHhfYmF0Y2gsIDAsICJtaW5pbWl6ZSB0cmFuc21pdCBsYXRlbmN5IGF0IHRo ZSBwb3NzaWJsZSBleHBlbnNlIG9mIHRocm91Z2hwdXQiKTsKK3N0YXRpYyBpbnQgaWZsaWJfdHhf dXBkYXRlX2ZyZXEgPSBJRkxJQl9ERUZBVUxUX1RYX1VQREFURV9GUkVROworU1lTQ1RMX1VJTlQo X25ldF9pZmxpYiwgT0lEX0FVVE8sIHR4X3VwZGF0ZV9mcmVxLCBDVExGTEFHX1JEVFVOLAorCQkg ICAmaWZsaWJfdHhfdXBkYXRlX2ZyZXEsIElGTElCX0RFRkFVTFRfVFhfVVBEQVRFX0ZSRVEsCisJ CSAgICJ0cmFtc21pdCBkZXNjcmlwdG9yIHVwZGF0ZXMgcGVyIHNlY29uZCIpOwogCi0KICNpZiBJ RkxJQl9ERUJVR19DT1VOVEVSUwogCiBzdGF0aWMgaW50IGlmbGliX3R4X3NlZW47CkBAIC0xNzYy LDggKzE3NjUsNyBAQAogCiAJLyogU2V0IG51bWJlciBvZiBkZXNjcmlwdG9ycyBhdmFpbGFibGUg Ki8KIAl0eHEtPmlmdF9xc3RhdHVzID0gSUZMSUJfUVVFVUVfSURMRTsKLQkvKiBYWFggbWFrZSBj b25maWd1cmFibGUgKi8KLQl0eHEtPmlmdF91cGRhdGVfZnJlcSA9IElGTElCX0RFRkFVTFRfVFhf VVBEQVRFX0ZSRVE7CisJdHhxLT5pZnRfdXBkYXRlX2ZyZXEgPSBpZmxpYl90eF91cGRhdGVfZnJl cTsKIAogCS8qIFJlc2V0IGluZGljZXMgKi8KIAl0eHEtPmlmdF9jaWR4X3Byb2Nlc3NlZCA9IDA7 CgoKCkVNQUlMIFBSRUZFUkVOQ0VTCiAgaHR0cHM6Ly9yZXZpZXdzLmZyZWVic2Qub3JnL3NldHRp bmdzL3BhbmVsL2VtYWlscHJlZmVyZW5jZXMvCgpUbzogbmVlbF9uZWVsYy5vcmcsIHNodXJkLCAj aWZsaWIKQ2M6IGltcCwgYWUsIG1lbGlmYXJvLCAjY29udHJpYnV0b3JfcmV2aWV3c19iYXNlLCBm cmVlYnNkLW5ldC1saXN0LCBtbWFjeSwga3ByYXZlZW4ubGttbF9nbWFpbC5jb20sIG1hcmNuYXJj X2dtYWlsLmNvbSwgc2ltb252ZWxsYV9nbWFpbC5jb20sIG5vdmljZV90ZWNoaWUuY29tLCB0b21t aS5wZXJuaWxhX2lraS5maSwga3J6eXN6dG9mLmdhbGF6a2FfaW50ZWwuY29tCg== --b1_f3d446f21cd6c2efd95244a286c217f0 Content-Type: text/x-patch; charset=utf-8; name="D24937.72058.patch" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="D24937.72058.patch" ZGlmZiAtLWdpdCBhL3N5cy9uZXQvaWZsaWIuYyBiL3N5cy9uZXQvaWZsaWIuYwotLS0gYS9zeXMv bmV0L2lmbGliLmMKKysrIGIvc3lzL25ldC9pZmxpYi5jCkBAIC01ODYsOCArNTg2LDExIEBACiBz dGF0aWMgaW50IGlmbGliX25vX3R4X2JhdGNoID0gMDsKIFNZU0NUTF9JTlQoX25ldF9pZmxpYiwg T0lEX0FVVE8sIG5vX3R4X2JhdGNoLCBDVExGTEFHX1JXLAogCQkgICAmaWZsaWJfbm9fdHhfYmF0 Y2gsIDAsICJtaW5pbWl6ZSB0cmFuc21pdCBsYXRlbmN5IGF0IHRoZSBwb3NzaWJsZSBleHBlbnNl IG9mIHRocm91Z2hwdXQiKTsKK3N0YXRpYyBpbnQgaWZsaWJfdHhfdXBkYXRlX2ZyZXEgPSBJRkxJ Ql9ERUZBVUxUX1RYX1VQREFURV9GUkVROworU1lTQ1RMX1VJTlQoX25ldF9pZmxpYiwgT0lEX0FV VE8sIHR4X3VwZGF0ZV9mcmVxLCBDVExGTEFHX1JEVFVOLAorCQkgICAmaWZsaWJfdHhfdXBkYXRl X2ZyZXEsIElGTElCX0RFRkFVTFRfVFhfVVBEQVRFX0ZSRVEsCisJCSAgICJ0cmFtc21pdCBkZXNj cmlwdG9yIHVwZGF0ZXMgcGVyIHNlY29uZCIpOwogCi0KICNpZiBJRkxJQl9ERUJVR19DT1VOVEVS UwogCiBzdGF0aWMgaW50IGlmbGliX3R4X3NlZW47CkBAIC0xNzYyLDggKzE3NjUsNyBAQAogCiAJ LyogU2V0IG51bWJlciBvZiBkZXNjcmlwdG9ycyBhdmFpbGFibGUgKi8KIAl0eHEtPmlmdF9xc3Rh dHVzID0gSUZMSUJfUVVFVUVfSURMRTsKLQkvKiBYWFggbWFrZSBjb25maWd1cmFibGUgKi8KLQl0 eHEtPmlmdF91cGRhdGVfZnJlcSA9IElGTElCX0RFRkFVTFRfVFhfVVBEQVRFX0ZSRVE7CisJdHhx LT5pZnRfdXBkYXRlX2ZyZXEgPSBpZmxpYl90eF91cGRhdGVfZnJlcTsKIAogCS8qIFJlc2V0IGlu ZGljZXMgKi8KIAl0eHEtPmlmdF9jaWR4X3Byb2Nlc3NlZCA9IDA7Cgo= --b1_f3d446f21cd6c2efd95244a286c217f0-- From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Jun 23 04:33:58 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2337F348339 for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 04:33:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from neel@neelc.org) Received: from rainpuddle.neelc.org (rainpuddle.neelc.org [IPv6:2001:19f0:8001:fed:5400:2ff:fe73:c622]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49rYM92BL9z3yb5 for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 04:33:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from neel@neelc.org) Received: from mail.neelc.org (rainpuddle.neelc.org [IPv6:2001:19f0:8001:fed:5400:2ff:fe73:c622]) by rainpuddle.neelc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5BFFAEB4E8 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 21:33:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=neelc.org; s=mail; t=1592886829; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding; bh=1V9xPFzGF0O2+/rX5QaVacWenIUOUpC/ie5aX842O7o=; b=h8JZwVIjreMIXWSEY6zNPleC58o4eVE9w1MIkLwlwZfrGZDunlgjLTH+XKK1QuZxY2dj/W +dZwzClYGzK26JGsCAP4/DJQnBrJsz55NNCC45uH8PQM8leGFkL8etwsukJmW4klIMNtam Q9Q1hPUrpw774RVbTPIiAVxKYJo2hR5HOMQ5ApqiMG6S6dgpk9fAMiGJt6qNGjx/d2z6K0 lMaEbZOIZR4ge/j277Ji90Rf4l7tIOSXkgXFhnDahWwdXsRxLr3RAbhmnkJretGoi84KCq bkq5B2RYRjQ6VrjDviMrpZOHuRQzEFieUrddRiHOvpyRFcFKY5vB0qhX3OWGAg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 21:33:49 -0700 From: Neel Chauhan To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Committing a few ipfw(8) patches User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.4.2 Message-ID: X-Sender: neel@neelc.org X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49rYM92BL9z3yb5 X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=neelc.org header.s=mail header.b=h8JZwVIj; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=neelc.org; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of neel@neelc.org designates 2001:19f0:8001:fed:5400:2ff:fe73:c622 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=neel@neelc.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.01 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[neelc.org:s=mail]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.02)[-1.021]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+a]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-net@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.03)[-1.031]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[neelc.org:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[neelc.org,none]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.05)[-0.054]; RCVD_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:20473, ipnet:2001:19f0:8000::/38, country:US]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; ONCE_RECEIVED(0.10)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 04:33:58 -0000 Hi freebsd-net@, I'm really sorry if I'm bothering you with emails like this. If there are any committers here, I have two patches for the ipfw(8) subsystem. The patches (w/ description & URL) are: === ipfw(8): In fill_ip6(), use a single statement for both "me" and "me6". This prevents unneeded code duplication. URL: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D24403 === ipfw: Support {w:x:y::z}:port (bracketed) IPv6 addresses in the fwd command. While we're doing this, optimize by not attempting to parse addresses if we're using tableargs. URL: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D24011 === Both patches have been accepted by rgrimes@, but neither are committed yet. Could one of you committers please commit the above two patches? If so, I would love that. Unfortunately, I am not a committer. I just happen to share a first name (not last) with one, don't get confused. Best, Neel Chauhan === https://www.neelc.org/ From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Jun 23 04:43:00 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A1073489B0 for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 04:43:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daemon-user@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49rYYc09lQz40H1; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 04:43:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daemon-user@freebsd.org) Received: from reviews.nyi.freebsd.org (reviews.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:607c::16:b]) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA8801A7F0; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 04:42:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daemon-user@freebsd.org) Received: by reviews.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1346) id E21699973E; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 04:42:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 04:42:59 +0000 To: Phabricator From: "koobs (Kubilay Kocak)" Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Reply-to: "koobs (Kubilay Kocak)" Subject: [Differential] D24937: Add readonly tunable net.iflib.tx_update_freq to set transmit descriptor update frequency Message-ID: X-Priority: 3 X-Phabricator-Sent-This-Message: Yes X-Mail-Transport-Agent: MetaMTA X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-Phabricator-Mail-Tags: , X-Herald-Rules: <28>, <81>, <89>, <128>, <67>, <118>, <110> X-Phabricator-Projects: <#network> X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: Precedence: bulk Thread-Topic: PHID-DREV-sjntqne4ry32ikjhkxqq X-Phabricator-Mail-ID: 2011322 X-Phabricator-Send-Attempt: yfhfb2cxcvcrua7g In-Reply-To: References: Thread-Index: Yzk3NzA0OWVmYTYyZDNhMjkzN2NhZDQyMjkyIF7xiFM= X-Phabricator-Stamps: actor(@koobs) application(Differential) author(@neel_neelc.org) blocking-reviewer(#iflib) herald(H28) herald(H67) herald(H81) herald(H89) herald(H110) herald(H118) herald(H128) monogram(D24937) object-type(DREV) phid(PHID-DREV-sjntqne4ry32ikjhkxqq) reviewer(#iflib) reviewer(@shurd) revision-repository(rS) revision-status(needs-review) subscriber(#contributor_reviews_base) subscriber(@ae) subscriber(@freebsd-net-list) subscriber(@imp) subscriber(@koobs) subscriber(@melifaro) tag(#network) via(web) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 04:43:00 -0000 a29vYnMgYWRkZWQgYSBjb21tZW50LgoKCiAgTWlnaHQgdGhlcmUgYmUgd2F5cyB0byBtYWtlIHRo aXMgcnVuLXRpbWUgdHVuYWJsZSwgb3IgaXMgaXQgZnVuZGFtZW50YWxseSBub3QgcG9zc2libGUg ZXZlbiBpbiBwcmluY2lwbGU/CgpSRVBPU0lUT1JZCiAgclMgRnJlZUJTRCBzcmMgcmVwb3NpdG9y eQoKQ0hBTkdFUyBTSU5DRSBMQVNUIEFDVElPTgogIGh0dHBzOi8vcmV2aWV3cy5mcmVlYnNkLm9y Zy9EMjQ5MzcvbmV3LwoKUkVWSVNJT04gREVUQUlMCiAgaHR0cHM6Ly9yZXZpZXdzLmZyZWVic2Qu b3JnL0QyNDkzNwoKRU1BSUwgUFJFRkVSRU5DRVMKICBodHRwczovL3Jldmlld3MuZnJlZWJzZC5v cmcvc2V0dGluZ3MvcGFuZWwvZW1haWxwcmVmZXJlbmNlcy8KClRvOiBuZWVsX25lZWxjLm9yZywg c2h1cmQsICNpZmxpYgpDYzoga29vYnMsIGltcCwgYWUsIG1lbGlmYXJvLCAjY29udHJpYnV0b3Jf cmV2aWV3c19iYXNlLCBmcmVlYnNkLW5ldC1saXN0LCBtbWFjeSwga3ByYXZlZW4ubGttbF9nbWFp bC5jb20sIG1hcmNuYXJjX2dtYWlsLmNvbSwgc2ltb252ZWxsYV9nbWFpbC5jb20sIG5vdmljZV90 ZWNoaWUuY29tLCB0b21taS5wZXJuaWxhX2lraS5maSwga3J6eXN6dG9mLmdhbGF6a2FfaW50ZWwu Y29tCg== From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Jun 23 04:57:28 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13A0C348DB6 for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 04:57:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daemon-user@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49rYtH5GWqz40jy; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 04:57:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daemon-user@freebsd.org) Received: from reviews.nyi.freebsd.org (reviews.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:607c::16:b]) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 814B71B109; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 04:57:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daemon-user@freebsd.org) Received: by reviews.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1346) id 7726AA68D6; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 04:57:27 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 04:57:27 +0000 To: Phabricator From: "neel_neelc.org (Neel Chauhan)" Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Reply-to: "neel_neelc.org (Neel Chauhan)" Subject: [Differential] D24937: Add sysctl net.iflib.tx_update_freq to set transmit descriptor update frequency Message-ID: X-Priority: 3 X-Phabricator-Sent-This-Message: Yes X-Mail-Transport-Agent: MetaMTA X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-Phabricator-Mail-Tags: , , X-Herald-Rules: <28>, <81>, <89>, <128>, <67>, <118>, <110>, <124> X-Phabricator-Projects: <#network> X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: Precedence: bulk Thread-Topic: PHID-DREV-sjntqne4ry32ikjhkxqq X-Phabricator-Mail-ID: 2011351 X-Phabricator-Send-Attempt: xbmlmcr34xo5ixra In-Reply-To: References: Thread-Index: Yzk3NzA0OWVmYTYyZDNhMjkzN2NhZDQyMjkyIF7xi7c= X-Phabricator-Stamps: actor(@neel_neelc.org) application(Differential) author(@neel_neelc.org) blocking-reviewer(#iflib) herald(H28) herald(H67) herald(H81) herald(H89) herald(H110) herald(H118) herald(H124) herald(H128) monogram(D24937) object-type(DREV) phid(PHID-DREV-sjntqne4ry32ikjhkxqq) reviewer(#iflib) reviewer(@shurd) revision-repository(rS) revision-status(needs-review) subscriber(#contributor_reviews_base) subscriber(@ae) subscriber(@freebsd-net-list) subscriber(@imp) subscriber(@koobs) subscriber(@melifaro) tag(#network) via(web) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="b1_e27c66cf1cfccaf1dbc1757cb9203e6b" X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 04:57:28 -0000 --b1_e27c66cf1cfccaf1dbc1757cb9203e6b Content-Type: text/plain; charset = "utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 bmVlbF9uZWVsYy5vcmcgdXBkYXRlZCB0aGlzIHJldmlzaW9uIHRvIERpZmYgNzM0OTMuCm5lZWxf bmVlbGMub3JnIHJldGl0bGVkIHRoaXMgcmV2aXNpb24gZnJvbSAiQWRkIHJlYWRvbmx5IHR1bmFi bGUgbmV0LmlmbGliLnR4X3VwZGF0ZV9mcmVxIHRvIHNldCB0cmFuc21pdCBkZXNjcmlwdG9yIHVw ZGF0ZSBmcmVxdWVuY3kiIHRvICJBZGQgc3lzY3RsIG5ldC5pZmxpYi50eF91cGRhdGVfZnJlcSB0 byBzZXQgdHJhbnNtaXQgZGVzY3JpcHRvciB1cGRhdGUgZnJlcXVlbmN5Ii4KbmVlbF9uZWVsYy5v cmcgZWRpdGVkIHRoZSBzdW1tYXJ5IG9mIHRoaXMgcmV2aXNpb24uCm5lZWxfbmVlbGMub3JnIGVk aXRlZCB0aGUgdGVzdCBwbGFuIGZvciB0aGlzIHJldmlzaW9uLgpuZWVsX25lZWxjLm9yZyBhZGRl ZCBhIGNvbW1lbnQuCgoKICBJIGhhdmUgYSBuZXcgcGF0Y2ggbWFraW5nIG5ldC5pZmxpYi50eF91 cGRhdGVfZnJlcSBhIHN5c2N0bC4gSSBhdHRlbXB0ZWQgdG8gbmV0LmlmbGliLnR4X3VwZGF0ZV9m cmVxPTMyIGZyb20gMTYgKHdpdGhvdXQgcmVib290aW5nISkgYW5kIGl0IHdvcmtlZC4KICAKICBM dWNraWx5IHdpdGggYSBicmFuZC1uZXcgYW5kIGZhc3QgZGV2IGJveCwgSSBjb3VsZCBjb21waWxl IGFuZCB0ZXN0IHF1aWNrbHkuCgpSRVBPU0lUT1JZCiAgclMgRnJlZUJTRCBzcmMgcmVwb3NpdG9y eQoKQ0hBTkdFUyBTSU5DRSBMQVNUIFVQREFURQogIGh0dHBzOi8vcmV2aWV3cy5mcmVlYnNkLm9y Zy9EMjQ5Mzc/dnM9NzIwNTgmaWQ9NzM0OTMKCkNIQU5HRVMgU0lOQ0UgTEFTVCBBQ1RJT04KICBo dHRwczovL3Jldmlld3MuZnJlZWJzZC5vcmcvRDI0OTM3L25ldy8KClJFVklTSU9OIERFVEFJTAog IGh0dHBzOi8vcmV2aWV3cy5mcmVlYnNkLm9yZy9EMjQ5MzcKCkFGRkVDVEVEIEZJTEVTCiAgc3lz L25ldC9pZmxpYi5jCgpDSEFOR0UgREVUQUlMUwoKZGlmZiAtLWdpdCBhL3N5cy9uZXQvaWZsaWIu YyBiL3N5cy9uZXQvaWZsaWIuYwotLS0gYS9zeXMvbmV0L2lmbGliLmMKKysrIGIvc3lzL25ldC9p ZmxpYi5jCkBAIC01ODYsOCArNTg2LDExIEBACiBzdGF0aWMgaW50IGlmbGliX25vX3R4X2JhdGNo ID0gMDsKIFNZU0NUTF9JTlQoX25ldF9pZmxpYiwgT0lEX0FVVE8sIG5vX3R4X2JhdGNoLCBDVExG TEFHX1JXLAogCQkgICAmaWZsaWJfbm9fdHhfYmF0Y2gsIDAsICJtaW5pbWl6ZSB0cmFuc21pdCBs YXRlbmN5IGF0IHRoZSBwb3NzaWJsZSBleHBlbnNlIG9mIHRocm91Z2hwdXQiKTsKK2ludCBpZmxp Yl90eF91cGRhdGVfZnJlcSA9IElGTElCX0RFRkFVTFRfVFhfVVBEQVRFX0ZSRVE7CitTWVNDVExf VUlOVChfbmV0X2lmbGliLCBPSURfQVVUTywgdHhfdXBkYXRlX2ZyZXEsIENUTEZMQUdfUlcsCisJ CSAgICZpZmxpYl90eF91cGRhdGVfZnJlcSwgSUZMSUJfREVGQVVMVF9UWF9VUERBVEVfRlJFUSwK KwkJICAgInRyYW1zbWl0IGRlc2NyaXB0b3IgdXBkYXRlcyBwZXIgc2Vjb25kIik7CiAKLQogI2lm IElGTElCX0RFQlVHX0NPVU5URVJTCiAKIHN0YXRpYyBpbnQgaWZsaWJfdHhfc2VlbjsKQEAgLTE3 NjgsOCArMTc3MSw3IEBACiAKIAkvKiBTZXQgbnVtYmVyIG9mIGRlc2NyaXB0b3JzIGF2YWlsYWJs ZSAqLwogCXR4cS0+aWZ0X3FzdGF0dXMgPSBJRkxJQl9RVUVVRV9JRExFOwotCS8qIFhYWCBtYWtl IGNvbmZpZ3VyYWJsZSAqLwotCXR4cS0+aWZ0X3VwZGF0ZV9mcmVxID0gSUZMSUJfREVGQVVMVF9U WF9VUERBVEVfRlJFUTsKKwl0eHEtPmlmdF91cGRhdGVfZnJlcSA9IGlmbGliX3R4X3VwZGF0ZV9m cmVxOwogCiAJLyogUmVzZXQgaW5kaWNlcyAqLwogCXR4cS0+aWZ0X2NpZHhfcHJvY2Vzc2VkID0g MDsKCgoKRU1BSUwgUFJFRkVSRU5DRVMKICBodHRwczovL3Jldmlld3MuZnJlZWJzZC5vcmcvc2V0 dGluZ3MvcGFuZWwvZW1haWxwcmVmZXJlbmNlcy8KClRvOiBuZWVsX25lZWxjLm9yZywgc2h1cmQs ICNpZmxpYgpDYzoga29vYnMsIGltcCwgYWUsIG1lbGlmYXJvLCAjY29udHJpYnV0b3JfcmV2aWV3 c19iYXNlLCBmcmVlYnNkLW5ldC1saXN0LCBtbWFjeSwga3ByYXZlZW4ubGttbF9nbWFpbC5jb20s IG1hcmNuYXJjX2dtYWlsLmNvbSwgc2ltb252ZWxsYV9nbWFpbC5jb20sIG5vdmljZV90ZWNoaWUu Y29tLCB0b21taS5wZXJuaWxhX2lraS5maSwga3J6eXN6dG9mLmdhbGF6a2FfaW50ZWwuY29tLCBh bGZpeDg2X2dtYWlsLmNvbQo= --b1_e27c66cf1cfccaf1dbc1757cb9203e6b Content-Type: text/x-patch; charset=utf-8; name="D24937.73493.patch" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="D24937.73493.patch" ZGlmZiAtLWdpdCBhL3N5cy9uZXQvaWZsaWIuYyBiL3N5cy9uZXQvaWZsaWIuYwotLS0gYS9zeXMv bmV0L2lmbGliLmMKKysrIGIvc3lzL25ldC9pZmxpYi5jCkBAIC01ODYsOCArNTg2LDExIEBACiBz dGF0aWMgaW50IGlmbGliX25vX3R4X2JhdGNoID0gMDsKIFNZU0NUTF9JTlQoX25ldF9pZmxpYiwg T0lEX0FVVE8sIG5vX3R4X2JhdGNoLCBDVExGTEFHX1JXLAogCQkgICAmaWZsaWJfbm9fdHhfYmF0 Y2gsIDAsICJtaW5pbWl6ZSB0cmFuc21pdCBsYXRlbmN5IGF0IHRoZSBwb3NzaWJsZSBleHBlbnNl IG9mIHRocm91Z2hwdXQiKTsKK2ludCBpZmxpYl90eF91cGRhdGVfZnJlcSA9IElGTElCX0RFRkFV TFRfVFhfVVBEQVRFX0ZSRVE7CitTWVNDVExfVUlOVChfbmV0X2lmbGliLCBPSURfQVVUTywgdHhf dXBkYXRlX2ZyZXEsIENUTEZMQUdfUlcsCisJCSAgICZpZmxpYl90eF91cGRhdGVfZnJlcSwgSUZM SUJfREVGQVVMVF9UWF9VUERBVEVfRlJFUSwKKwkJICAgInRyYW1zbWl0IGRlc2NyaXB0b3IgdXBk YXRlcyBwZXIgc2Vjb25kIik7CiAKLQogI2lmIElGTElCX0RFQlVHX0NPVU5URVJTCiAKIHN0YXRp YyBpbnQgaWZsaWJfdHhfc2VlbjsKQEAgLTE3NjgsOCArMTc3MSw3IEBACiAKIAkvKiBTZXQgbnVt YmVyIG9mIGRlc2NyaXB0b3JzIGF2YWlsYWJsZSAqLwogCXR4cS0+aWZ0X3FzdGF0dXMgPSBJRkxJ Ql9RVUVVRV9JRExFOwotCS8qIFhYWCBtYWtlIGNvbmZpZ3VyYWJsZSAqLwotCXR4cS0+aWZ0X3Vw ZGF0ZV9mcmVxID0gSUZMSUJfREVGQVVMVF9UWF9VUERBVEVfRlJFUTsKKwl0eHEtPmlmdF91cGRh dGVfZnJlcSA9IGlmbGliX3R4X3VwZGF0ZV9mcmVxOwogCiAJLyogUmVzZXQgaW5kaWNlcyAqLwog CXR4cS0+aWZ0X2NpZHhfcHJvY2Vzc2VkID0gMDsKCg== --b1_e27c66cf1cfccaf1dbc1757cb9203e6b-- From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Jun 23 05:19:18 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6514D348F6C for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 05:19:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net) Received: from gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (br1.CN84in.dnsmgr.net [69.59.192.140]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49rZMT4hCtz41j2 for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 05:19:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net) Received: from gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id 05N5JF3Q013911; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 22:19:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net) Received: (from freebsd-rwg@localhost) by gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id 05N5JFkt013910; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 22:19:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg) From: "Rodney W. Grimes" Message-Id: <202006230519.05N5JFkt013910@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> Subject: Re: Committing a few ipfw(8) patches In-Reply-To: To: Neel Chauhan Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 22:19:15 -0700 (PDT) CC: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL121h (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49rZMT4hCtz41j2 X-Spamd-Bar: + Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of freebsd-rwg@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net has no SPF policy when checking 69.59.192.140) smtp.mailfrom=freebsd-rwg@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [1.28 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.35)[0.351]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[dnsmgr.net]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.01)[0.013]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.01)[0.013]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:13868, ipnet:69.59.192.0/19, country:US]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 05:19:18 -0000 > Hi freebsd-net@, > > I'm really sorry if I'm bothering you with emails like this. > > If there are any committers here, I have two patches for the ipfw(8) > subsystem. > > The patches (w/ description & URL) are: > > === > ipfw(8): In fill_ip6(), use a single statement for both "me" and "me6". > This prevents unneeded code duplication. > > URL: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D24403 > === > ipfw: Support {w:x:y::z}:port (bracketed) IPv6 addresses in the fwd > command. > > While we're doing this, optimize by not attempting to parse addresses if > we're using tableargs. > > URL: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D24011 > === > > Both patches have been accepted by rgrimes@, but neither are committed > yet. Since I am not an "area expert" on ipfw I do not feel comfortable in commiting these patches without additional review. If they can get some more review I would be fine with committing them. > Could one of you committers please commit the above two patches? If so, > I would love that. > > Unfortunately, I am not a committer. I just happen to share a first name > (not last) with one, don't get confused. > > Best, > > Neel Chauhan > > === > > https://www.neelc.org/ > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- Rod Grimes rgrimes@freebsd.org From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Jun 23 05:33:42 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3BDB349A7F for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 05:33:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49rZh655DVz42Gx for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 05:33:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id ACE4E349946; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 05:33:42 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB659349877; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 05:33:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net) Received: from gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (br1.CN84in.dnsmgr.net [69.59.192.140]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49rZh55b1Bz42Gw; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 05:33:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net) Received: from gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id 05N5XdP6013965; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 22:33:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net) Received: (from freebsd-rwg@localhost) by gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id 05N5XdsD013964; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 22:33:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg) From: "Rodney W. Grimes" Message-Id: <202006230533.05N5XdsD013964@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> Subject: Re: routed && route6d removal proposal In-Reply-To: <33c892bf-5d71-cd65-3041-449cc1bf6e6b@grosbein.net> To: Eugene Grosbein Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 22:33:39 -0700 (PDT) CC: "Rodney W. Grimes" , "current@FreeBSD.org" , net , freebsd-hackers X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL121h (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49rZh55b1Bz42Gw X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of freebsd-rwg@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net has no SPF policy when checking 69.59.192.140) smtp.mailfrom=freebsd-rwg@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.76 / 15.00]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_SOME(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.37)[-0.369]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.38)[0.382]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.15)[-0.150]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[dnsmgr.net]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:13868, ipnet:69.59.192.0/19, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 05:33:43 -0000 > 23.06.2020 2:26, Rodney W. Grimes wrote: > > >> 22.06.2020 19:49, Rodney W. Grimes wrote: > >>> Whats unmaintained about code that has no need to change cause it just pretty much works? > >> Have you actually tried running routed(8) as base for real network with loops, > >> mix of p2p and ethernet-like interfaces, IPv4 aliases, need of offset-lists and > >> with diameter about 6 hops? > > > > As I said I know of people that are running and it is working, and > > Hiroko's post clearly establishes that as fact in evidence. > > > > I am not even sure that RIP* has loop detection in the protocol, > > It has, of course. Slight miss communications, there really isnt a loop detection in the on wire protocol, or multipath support, it simply excludes certain routes that end up excluded by counting to infinity to stop the loop (inifinity is usually 16 for this solution). Its not like OSPF or BGP where you can calculate loops and mulipath effects. Bottom line, RipV2 is not healthy on a network when loops exist, though it should not lead to failure. > > > as the prefered routing protocol for anything multipath (which > > is what loops are in effect) is OSPF. > > RIPv2 may be used for failover, not for multipath. Any redundant route creates L3 "multipath". Yes. > >> I'm not talking about RIPv2 inherent deficiencies. > >> Our routed just glitches where quagga's ripd just works. > > > > And your PR# for reporting the bug is? > > Was. https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51927 > Never had a chance to verify if it was really fixed in HEAD because it was not for RELENG_4, > so I moved to ripd. As you may remeber, RELENG_5 needed much time to become ready for production. I can not find any commit linked to that bug, but this is probalby before the system to do that existed. Unless we can confirm the bug still exists I think it would be predunt to assume it is fixed based on what I read in the PR, so dismissing the claim that the inbase routed "just glitches." Can you agree with that logic Eugene? Regards, -- Rod Grimes rgrimes@freebsd.org From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Jun 23 06:00:56 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC06D34A5EB for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 06:00:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daemon-user@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49rbHX5K9yz43bl; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 06:00:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daemon-user@freebsd.org) Received: from reviews.nyi.freebsd.org (reviews.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:607c::16:b]) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE4EC1B4FF; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 06:00:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daemon-user@freebsd.org) Received: by reviews.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1346) id AD449C5706; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 06:00:56 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 06:00:56 +0000 To: Phabricator From: "koobs (Kubilay Kocak)" Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Reply-to: "koobs (Kubilay Kocak)" Subject: [Differential] D24937: Add sysctl net.iflib.tx_update_freq to set transmit descriptor update frequency Message-ID: X-Priority: 3 X-Phabricator-Sent-This-Message: Yes X-Mail-Transport-Agent: MetaMTA X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-Phabricator-Mail-Tags: X-Herald-Rules: <28>, <81>, <89>, <128>, <67>, <118>, <110>, <124> X-Phabricator-Projects: <#network> X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: Precedence: bulk Thread-Topic: PHID-DREV-sjntqne4ry32ikjhkxqq X-Phabricator-Mail-ID: 2011419 X-Phabricator-Send-Attempt: c4amlg75hbvmv3ea In-Reply-To: References: Thread-Index: Yzk3NzA0OWVmYTYyZDNhMjkzN2NhZDQyMjkyIF7xmpg= X-Phabricator-Stamps: actor(@koobs) application(Differential) author(@neel_neelc.org) blocking-reviewer(#iflib) herald(H28) herald(H67) herald(H81) herald(H89) herald(H110) herald(H118) herald(H124) herald(H128) mention(@neel_neelc.org) monogram(D24937) object-type(DREV) phid(PHID-DREV-sjntqne4ry32ikjhkxqq) reviewer(#iflib) reviewer(@shurd) revision-repository(rS) revision-status(needs-review) subscriber(#contributor_reviews_base) subscriber(@ae) subscriber(@freebsd-net-list) subscriber(@imp) subscriber(@koobs) subscriber(@melifaro) tag(#network) via(web) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 06:00:57 -0000 a29vYnMgYWRkZWQgYSBjb21tZW50LgoKCiAgSW4gRDI0OTM3IzU2MDYyMSA8aHR0cHM6Ly9yZXZp ZXdzLmZyZWVic2Qub3JnL0QyNDkzNyM1NjA2MjE+LCBAbmVlbF9uZWVsYy5vcmcgd3JvdGU6CiAg CiAgPiBJIGhhdmUgYSBuZXcgcGF0Y2ggbWFraW5nIG5ldC5pZmxpYi50eF91cGRhdGVfZnJlcSBh IHN5c2N0bC4gSSBhdHRlbXB0ZWQgdG8gbmV0LmlmbGliLnR4X3VwZGF0ZV9mcmVxPTMyIGZyb20g MTYgKHdpdGhvdXQgcmVib290aW5nISkgYW5kIGl0IHdvcmtlZC4KICA+CiAgPiBMdWNraWx5IHdp dGggYSBicmFuZC1uZXcgYW5kIGZhc3QgZGV2IGJveCwgSSBjb3VsZCBjb21waWxlIGFuZCB0ZXN0 IHF1aWNrbHkuCiAgCiAgXG8vCiAgCiAgVGhhbmtzIE5lZWwhCgpSRVBPU0lUT1JZCiAgclMgRnJl ZUJTRCBzcmMgcmVwb3NpdG9yeQoKQ0hBTkdFUyBTSU5DRSBMQVNUIEFDVElPTgogIGh0dHBzOi8v cmV2aWV3cy5mcmVlYnNkLm9yZy9EMjQ5MzcvbmV3LwoKUkVWSVNJT04gREVUQUlMCiAgaHR0cHM6 Ly9yZXZpZXdzLmZyZWVic2Qub3JnL0QyNDkzNwoKRU1BSUwgUFJFRkVSRU5DRVMKICBodHRwczov L3Jldmlld3MuZnJlZWJzZC5vcmcvc2V0dGluZ3MvcGFuZWwvZW1haWxwcmVmZXJlbmNlcy8KClRv OiBuZWVsX25lZWxjLm9yZywgc2h1cmQsICNpZmxpYgpDYzoga29vYnMsIGltcCwgYWUsIG1lbGlm YXJvLCAjY29udHJpYnV0b3JfcmV2aWV3c19iYXNlLCBmcmVlYnNkLW5ldC1saXN0LCBtbWFjeSwg a3ByYXZlZW4ubGttbF9nbWFpbC5jb20sIG1hcmNuYXJjX2dtYWlsLmNvbSwgc2ltb252ZWxsYV9n bWFpbC5jb20sIG5vdmljZV90ZWNoaWUuY29tLCB0b21taS5wZXJuaWxhX2lraS5maSwga3J6eXN6 dG9mLmdhbGF6a2FfaW50ZWwuY29tCg== From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Jun 23 07:07:02 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A39734BB80 for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 07:07:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daemon-user@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49rclp1Vngz46Nv; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 07:07:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daemon-user@freebsd.org) Received: from reviews.nyi.freebsd.org (reviews.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:607c::16:b]) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDEBF1C88E; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 07:07:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daemon-user@freebsd.org) Received: by reviews.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1346) id EC2451B0DD6; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 07:07:01 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 07:07:01 +0000 To: Phabricator From: "aleksandr.fedorov_itglobal.com (Aleksandr Fedorov)" Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Reply-to: "aleksandr.fedorov_itglobal.com (Aleksandr Fedorov)" Subject: [Differential] D24937: Add sysctl net.iflib.tx_update_freq to set transmit descriptor update frequency Message-ID: X-Priority: 3 X-Phabricator-Sent-This-Message: Yes X-Mail-Transport-Agent: MetaMTA X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-Phabricator-Mail-Tags: , X-Herald-Rules: <28>, <81>, <89>, <128>, <67>, <118>, <110>, <124> X-Phabricator-Projects: <#network> X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: Precedence: bulk Thread-Topic: PHID-DREV-sjntqne4ry32ikjhkxqq X-Phabricator-Mail-ID: 2011543 X-Phabricator-Send-Attempt: b2n5ulsu3arnhgmo In-Reply-To: References: Thread-Index: Yzk3NzA0OWVmYTYyZDNhMjkzN2NhZDQyMjkyIF7xqhU= X-Phabricator-Stamps: actor(@aleksandr.fedorov_itglobal.com) application(Differential) author(@neel_neelc.org) blocking-reviewer(#iflib) herald(H28) herald(H67) herald(H81) herald(H89) herald(H110) herald(H118) herald(H124) herald(H128) monogram(D24937) object-type(DREV) phid(PHID-DREV-sjntqne4ry32ikjhkxqq) reviewer(#iflib) reviewer(@shurd) revision-repository(rS) revision-status(needs-review) subscriber(#contributor_reviews_base) subscriber(@ae) subscriber(@aleksandr.fedorov_itglobal.com) subscriber(@freebsd-net-list) subscriber(@imp) subscriber(@koobs) subscriber(@melifaro) tag(#network) via(web) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 07:07:02 -0000 YWxla3NhbmRyLmZlZG9yb3ZfaXRnbG9iYWwuY29tIGFkZGVkIGlubGluZSBjb21tZW50cy4KCklO TElORSBDT01NRU5UUwoKPiBpZmxpYi5jOjI5MTYKPiAgCj4gICNkZWZpbmUgVFhEX05PVElGWV9D T1VOVCh0eHEpICgoKHR4cSktPmlmdF9zaXplIC8gKHR4cSktPmlmdF91cGRhdGVfZnJlcSktMSkK PiAgc3RhdGljIGlubGluZSBxaWR4X3QKCkkgYW0gd29ycmllZCB0aGF0IGlmIHRoZSB1c2VyIHNl dHMgdGhlIHZhbHVlIHRvIDEsIHRoZW4gdGhpcyB3aWxsIGxlYWQgdG8gZGl2aXNpb24gYnkgemVy byBhbmQgdG8ga2VybmVsIHBhbmljLiBJIHRoaW5rIGFkZGl0aW9uYWwgY2hlY2tzIGFyZSBuZWVk ZWQuCgpSRVBPU0lUT1JZCiAgclMgRnJlZUJTRCBzcmMgcmVwb3NpdG9yeQoKQ0hBTkdFUyBTSU5D RSBMQVNUIEFDVElPTgogIGh0dHBzOi8vcmV2aWV3cy5mcmVlYnNkLm9yZy9EMjQ5MzcvbmV3LwoK UkVWSVNJT04gREVUQUlMCiAgaHR0cHM6Ly9yZXZpZXdzLmZyZWVic2Qub3JnL0QyNDkzNwoKRU1B SUwgUFJFRkVSRU5DRVMKICBodHRwczovL3Jldmlld3MuZnJlZWJzZC5vcmcvc2V0dGluZ3MvcGFu ZWwvZW1haWxwcmVmZXJlbmNlcy8KClRvOiBuZWVsX25lZWxjLm9yZywgc2h1cmQsICNpZmxpYgpD YzogYWxla3NhbmRyLmZlZG9yb3ZfaXRnbG9iYWwuY29tLCBrb29icywgaW1wLCBhZSwgbWVsaWZh cm8sICNjb250cmlidXRvcl9yZXZpZXdzX2Jhc2UsIGZyZWVic2QtbmV0LWxpc3QsIG1tYWN5LCBr cHJhdmVlbi5sa21sX2dtYWlsLmNvbSwgbWFyY25hcmNfZ21haWwuY29tLCBzaW1vbnZlbGxhX2dt YWlsLmNvbSwgbm92aWNlX3RlY2hpZS5jb20sIHRvbW1pLnBlcm5pbGFfaWtpLmZpLCBrcnp5c3p0 b2YuZ2FsYXprYV9pbnRlbC5jb20K From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Jun 23 12:46:37 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DE00354987 for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 12:46:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounce@track-my-url.com) Received: from srv-55.mkzp.com (srv-55.mkzp.com [37.1.145.55]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49rmHc3hzVz4VM6 for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 12:46:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounce@track-my-url.com) To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: =?UTF-8?B?S2nFn2lzZWwgVmVyaWxlcmluIEtvcnVubWFzxLEgS2FudW51IChLVktLKQ==?= Message-ID: <2b840c614e009c3378a6734cf693d5a9@track-2.email-bouncer.com> Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 12:12:46 +0000 From: "=?UTF-8?B?VMO8cmtpeWUgU2VybWF5ZSBQaXlhc2FsYXLEsSBCaXJsacSfaQ==?=" Reply-To: info@tspb.org.tr MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer-LID: 469 X-Mailer-RecptId: 2389711 X-Mailer-SID: 5230 X-Mailer-Sent-By: 15 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49rmHc3hzVz4VM6 X-Spamd-Bar: ++++++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed), No valid DKIM" header.from=tspb.org.tr (policy=none); spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of bounce@track-my-url.com designates 37.1.145.55 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bounce@track-my-url.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [6.84 / 15.00]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[info@tspb.org.tr]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:37.1.145.62/28:c]; REPLYTO_ADDR_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[info@tspb.org.tr,bounce@track-my-url.com]; RCVD_COUNT_ZERO(0.00)[0]; HAS_INTERSPIRE_SIG(1.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; R_MIXED_CHARSET(2.78)[subject]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[info@tspb.org.tr,bounce@track-my-url.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:60781, ipnet:37.1.145.0/24, country:NL]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; PHISHING(1.11)[tspb.org.tr->email-bouncer.com]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.12)[-0.117]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; HAS_PHPMAILER_SIG(0.00)[]; HAS_LIST_UNSUB(-0.01)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; MANY_INVISIBLE_PARTS(0.10)[2]; AUTOGEN_PHP_SPAMMY(1.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.50)[0.505]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.38)[0.377]; GREYLIST(0.00)[pass,body]; DMARC_POLICY_SOFTFAIL(0.10)[tspb.org.tr : SPF not aligned (relaxed), No valid DKIM, none] X-Spam: Yes Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.33 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 12:46:37 -0000 TSPB Birlikte Eğitim Mesleki Gelişim Eğitimleri Bülteni Daha İyi Görüntülemek İçin Tıklayın [http://track-2.email-bouncer.com/0111D2389711|11009c00fdf926bb981d59ee664f79715a6a|00005230|1110469|11002366.html]TSPB Birlikte Eğitim Mesleki Gelişim Eğitimleri "Kişisel Verilerin Korunması Kanunu" - Online Eğitim"Zoom"uygulaması üzerinden gerçekleştirilecektir. Eğitimin 25 kişilik kontenjanı bulunmaktadır. Başvurularını gerçekleştirilen katılımcılara online eğitime giriş için gerekli bilgiler iletilecektir. Başvuru için: www.tspb.org.tr [http://track-2.email-bouncer.com/1001L2389711|10015230|111022069|1110T.html] Üyelik ve başvurularınızla ilgili sorularınız için: info@birlikteeğitim.org [mailto:info@birlikteeğitim.org] ve ya aşağıdaki telefon numarasından bize ulaşabilirsiniz. Eğitmen: Av. Yücel Hamzaoğlu-Hamzaoğlu Partners&Hukuk Bürosu Kurucu Ortak Eğitim Tarihi: 21 Temmuz 2020 Eğitim Süresi: ½ Gün Ders Saati: 13:30-17:30 Eğitim Ücreti: 200 TL (KDV dahil, kişi başı) Eğitim Yeri: Online Eğitim-Zoom Başvuru: www.tspb.org.tr [http://track-2.email-bouncer.com/0101L2389711|11005230|001122069|0110T.html] TSPB Birlikte Eğitim Büyükdere Caddesi No: 173 1.Levent Plaza A Blok Kat4 Şişli-İstanbul Telefon: 0212 280 85 67 info@birlikteegitim.org [mailto:info@birlikteegitim.org] www.tspb.org.tr [http://track-2.email-bouncer.com/1000L2389711|01105230|10105892|1011T.html] Kişisel veri nedir? Anonim olarak toplanan bilgiler kişisel veri kabul edilebilir mi? Kişisel verilerin toplanması, kullanılması ya da aktarılması için rıza almak zorunlu mudur? Bir şirketten kişisel verilerinizin tümünü silmesini talep edebilir misiniz? Kişisel verilerinize ilişkin haklarınız nelerdir? Kişisel verilerin korunması kanunu şirketlerin uygulamalarında neleri değiştirmiştir. Kişisel verilerin korunması mevzuatına aykırılık durumunda ne gibi risk ve yaptırımlarla karşılanabilir? 21 Temmuz 2020 tarihinde "Kişisel Verilerin Korunması Kanunu (KVKK)" online eğitimimize bekliyoruz. EĞİTİM KONULARI Kişisel Verilerin Korunma Kanunu'na Genel Bakış Kişisel Verilerin Korunmasına İlişkin Mevzuat Düzenlemeleri Kişisel Verileri Koruma Kurulu Kararları Kişisel Veri Kişisel Verilerin Tanımı Temel Kavram ve Aktörler (Veri Sorumlusu, Veri İşleyen, İlgili Kişi) Kişisel Verilerin İşlenmesi Kişisel Verilerin İşlenmesine İlişkin Örnekler Hukuka Uygun Veri İşleme Kişisel Verilerin İşlenmesine İlişkin İstisnalar Özel Nitelikteki Kişisel Verilerin İşlenmesine İlişkin İstisnalar Açık Rızanın Unsurları Nelerdir ve Nasıl İspat Edilir? Kişisel Verilerin İşlenme İlkeleri Kişisel Verilerin Aktarılması Veri Sorumlusunun Yükümlülükleri Aydınlatma Yükümlülüğü Veri Güvenliği Kapsamındaki Yükümlülükler Anonimleştirme, Silme Yok Etme Kapsamındaki Yükümlülükler Önemli Hususlar Diğer Yükümlülükler Veri Sahibinin Hakları Veri Sorumlusuna Başvuru Kişisel Verileri Koruma Kurulu'na Şikayet Usulü Veri Sorumlulukları Sicili Hakkında Yönetmelik Veri Sorumluları Sicili-VERBİS İrtibat Kişisi Kanunlarda Öngörülen Yaptırımlar Güncel Kurul Düzenlemeleri Doğrultusunda Yaptırımlar Kanun'un Uygulanmadığı Haller KVKK Kanunu'na Uyum Tavsiyeler Politika ve Prosedürler Çalışanlara İlişkin Yükümlülük ve TedbirlerBu e-posta tarafınıza TSPB tarafından oluşturulan üye veritabanına kayıtlı olduğunuz için gönderilmiştir.Beni bu listeden çıkar [http://track-2.email-bouncer.com/1011U2389711|11019c00fdf926bb981d59ee664f79715a6a|1011469|10015230.html] From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Jun 23 13:37:52 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27F703554E7 for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 13:37:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49rnQl5MgGz4XjB for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 13:37:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id B65C9355650; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 13:37:51 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B60953554E6; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 13:37:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Received: from hz.grosbein.net (hz.grosbein.net [IPv6:2a01:4f8:c2c:26d8::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "hz.grosbein.net", Issuer "hz.grosbein.net" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49rnQk3bBzz4Xj9; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 13:37:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Received: from eg.sd.rdtc.ru (eg.sd.rdtc.ru [IPv6:2a03:3100:c:13:0:0:0:5]) by hz.grosbein.net (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 05NDbXg9030259 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 23 Jun 2020 13:37:37 GMT (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) X-Envelope-From: eugen@grosbein.net X-Envelope-To: freebsd-rwg@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net Received: from [10.58.0.10] (dadvw [10.58.0.10]) by eg.sd.rdtc.ru (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 05NDbS2u042953 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Tue, 23 Jun 2020 20:37:28 +0700 (+07) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Subject: Re: routed && route6d removal proposal To: "Rodney W. Grimes" References: <202006230533.05N5XdsD013964@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> Cc: net , freebsd-hackers From: Eugene Grosbein Message-ID: Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 20:37:21 +0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <202006230533.05N5XdsD013964@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,LOCAL_FROM, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Report: * -2.3 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record * -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record * 2.6 LOCAL_FROM From my domains X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on hz.grosbein.net X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49rnQk3bBzz4Xj9 X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=permerror (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of eugen@grosbein.net uses mechanism not recognized by this client) smtp.mailfrom=eugen@grosbein.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.53 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.74)[-0.735]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.12)[0.121]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.81)[-0.811]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[grosbein.net]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_PERMFAIL(0.00)[empty SPF record]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:2a01:4f8::/29, country:DE]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 13:37:52 -0000 23.06.2020 12:33, Rodney W. Grimes wrote: > Can you agree with that logic Eugene? I'm not against keeping routed(8) in the base while it has happy users raising voice for it. From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Jun 23 14:59:59 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 205593577B0 for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 14:59:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daemon-user@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49rqFV5Wp2z4f4m; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 14:59:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daemon-user@freebsd.org) Received: from reviews.nyi.freebsd.org (reviews.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:607c::16:b]) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4F7421EE9; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 14:59:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daemon-user@freebsd.org) Received: by reviews.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1346) id B15E527F248; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 14:59:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 14:59:58 +0000 To: Phabricator From: "gallatin (Andrew Gallatin)" Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Reply-to: "gallatin (Andrew Gallatin)" Subject: [Differential] D24937: Add sysctl net.iflib.tx_update_freq to set transmit descriptor update frequency Message-ID: X-Priority: 3 X-Phabricator-Sent-This-Message: Yes X-Mail-Transport-Agent: MetaMTA X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-Phabricator-Mail-Tags: , X-Herald-Rules: <28>, <81>, <89>, <128>, <67>, <118>, <110>, <124> X-Phabricator-Projects: <#network> X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: Precedence: bulk Thread-Topic: PHID-DREV-sjntqne4ry32ikjhkxqq X-Phabricator-Mail-ID: 2012785 X-Phabricator-Send-Attempt: f74cxlvyhphyshjd In-Reply-To: References: Thread-Index: Yzk3NzA0OWVmYTYyZDNhMjkzN2NhZDQyMjkyIF7yGO4= X-Phabricator-Stamps: actor(@gallatin) application(Differential) author(@neel_neelc.org) blocking-reviewer(#iflib) herald(H28) herald(H67) herald(H81) herald(H89) herald(H110) herald(H118) herald(H124) herald(H128) monogram(D24937) object-type(DREV) phid(PHID-DREV-sjntqne4ry32ikjhkxqq) reviewer(#iflib) reviewer(@shurd) revision-repository(rS) revision-status(needs-review) subscriber(#contributor_reviews_base) subscriber(@ae) subscriber(@aleksandr.fedorov_itglobal.com) subscriber(@freebsd-net-list) subscriber(@gallatin) subscriber(@imp) subscriber(@koobs) subscriber(@melifaro) tag(#network) via(web) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 14:59:59 -0000 Z2FsbGF0aW4gYWRkZWQgaW5saW5lIGNvbW1lbnRzLgoKSU5MSU5FIENPTU1FTlRTCgo+IGlmbGli LmM6NTkwCj4gK2ludCBpZmxpYl90eF91cGRhdGVfZnJlcSA9IElGTElCX0RFRkFVTFRfVFhfVVBE QVRFX0ZSRVE7Cj4gK1NZU0NUTF9VSU5UKF9uZXRfaWZsaWIsIE9JRF9BVVRPLCB0eF91cGRhdGVf ZnJlcSwgQ1RMRkxBR19SVywKPiArCQkgICAmaWZsaWJfdHhfdXBkYXRlX2ZyZXEsIElGTElCX0RF RkFVTFRfVFhfVVBEQVRFX0ZSRVEsCgpDYW4geW91IHBsZWFzZSBtYWtlIHRoaXMgYSB0dW5hYmxl IGFzIHdlbGw/ICBFZyBDVExGTEFHX1JXVFVOCgpSRVBPU0lUT1JZCiAgclMgRnJlZUJTRCBzcmMg cmVwb3NpdG9yeQoKQ0hBTkdFUyBTSU5DRSBMQVNUIEFDVElPTgogIGh0dHBzOi8vcmV2aWV3cy5m cmVlYnNkLm9yZy9EMjQ5MzcvbmV3LwoKUkVWSVNJT04gREVUQUlMCiAgaHR0cHM6Ly9yZXZpZXdz LmZyZWVic2Qub3JnL0QyNDkzNwoKRU1BSUwgUFJFRkVSRU5DRVMKICBodHRwczovL3Jldmlld3Mu ZnJlZWJzZC5vcmcvc2V0dGluZ3MvcGFuZWwvZW1haWxwcmVmZXJlbmNlcy8KClRvOiBuZWVsX25l ZWxjLm9yZywgc2h1cmQsICNpZmxpYgpDYzogZ2FsbGF0aW4sIGFsZWtzYW5kci5mZWRvcm92X2l0 Z2xvYmFsLmNvbSwga29vYnMsIGltcCwgYWUsIG1lbGlmYXJvLCAjY29udHJpYnV0b3JfcmV2aWV3 c19iYXNlLCBmcmVlYnNkLW5ldC1saXN0LCBtbWFjeSwga3ByYXZlZW4ubGttbF9nbWFpbC5jb20s IG1hcmNuYXJjX2dtYWlsLmNvbSwgc2ltb252ZWxsYV9nbWFpbC5jb20sIG5vdmljZV90ZWNoaWUu Y29tLCB0b21taS5wZXJuaWxhX2lraS5maSwga3J6eXN6dG9mLmdhbGF6a2FfaW50ZWwuY29tCg== From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Jun 23 15:04:58 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D7BA357AB7 for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 15:04:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daemon-user@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49rqMF4gJqz4fVG; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 15:04:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daemon-user@freebsd.org) Received: from reviews.nyi.freebsd.org (reviews.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:607c::16:b]) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60F9622682; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 15:04:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daemon-user@freebsd.org) Received: by reviews.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1346) id 5E24E2BF18B; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 15:04:57 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 15:04:57 +0000 To: Phabricator From: "neel_neelc.org (Neel Chauhan)" Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Reply-to: "neel_neelc.org (Neel Chauhan)" Subject: [Differential] D24937: Add tunable net.iflib.tx_update_freq to set transmit descriptor update frequency Message-ID: X-Priority: 3 X-Phabricator-Sent-This-Message: Yes X-Mail-Transport-Agent: MetaMTA X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-Phabricator-Mail-Tags: , , X-Herald-Rules: <28>, <81>, <89>, <128>, <67>, <118>, <110>, <124> X-Phabricator-Projects: <#network> X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: Precedence: bulk Thread-Topic: PHID-DREV-sjntqne4ry32ikjhkxqq X-Phabricator-Mail-ID: 2012862 X-Phabricator-Send-Attempt: xzqad7bs6phoq6xk In-Reply-To: References: Thread-Index: Yzk3NzA0OWVmYTYyZDNhMjkzN2NhZDQyMjkyIF7yGhk= X-Phabricator-Stamps: actor(@neel_neelc.org) application(Differential) author(@neel_neelc.org) blocking-reviewer(#iflib) herald(H28) herald(H67) herald(H81) herald(H89) herald(H110) herald(H118) herald(H124) herald(H128) monogram(D24937) object-type(DREV) phid(PHID-DREV-sjntqne4ry32ikjhkxqq) reviewer(#iflib) reviewer(@shurd) revision-repository(rS) revision-status(needs-review) subscriber(#contributor_reviews_base) subscriber(@ae) subscriber(@aleksandr.fedorov_itglobal.com) subscriber(@freebsd-net-list) subscriber(@gallatin) subscriber(@imp) subscriber(@koobs) subscriber(@melifaro) tag(#network) via(web) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="b1_f3736609880045bfd89b16baf311cc95" X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 15:04:58 -0000 --b1_f3736609880045bfd89b16baf311cc95 Content-Type: text/plain; charset = "utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 bmVlbF9uZWVsYy5vcmcgdXBkYXRlZCB0aGlzIHJldmlzaW9uIHRvIERpZmYgNzM1MjAuCm5lZWxf bmVlbGMub3JnIHJldGl0bGVkIHRoaXMgcmV2aXNpb24gZnJvbSAiQWRkIHN5c2N0bCBuZXQuaWZs aWIudHhfdXBkYXRlX2ZyZXEgdG8gc2V0IHRyYW5zbWl0IGRlc2NyaXB0b3IgdXBkYXRlIGZyZXF1 ZW5jeSIgdG8gIkFkZCB0dW5hYmxlIG5ldC5pZmxpYi50eF91cGRhdGVfZnJlcSB0byBzZXQgdHJh bnNtaXQgZGVzY3JpcHRvciB1cGRhdGUgZnJlcXVlbmN5Ii4KbmVlbF9uZWVsYy5vcmcgZWRpdGVk IHRoZSBzdW1tYXJ5IG9mIHRoaXMgcmV2aXNpb24uCm5lZWxfbmVlbGMub3JnIGVkaXRlZCB0aGUg dGVzdCBwbGFuIGZvciB0aGlzIHJldmlzaW9uLgpuZWVsX25lZWxjLm9yZyBhZGRlZCBhIGNvbW1l bnQuCgoKICBEb25lLgoKUkVQT1NJVE9SWQogIHJTIEZyZWVCU0Qgc3JjIHJlcG9zaXRvcnkKCkNI QU5HRVMgU0lOQ0UgTEFTVCBVUERBVEUKICBodHRwczovL3Jldmlld3MuZnJlZWJzZC5vcmcvRDI0 OTM3P3ZzPTczNDkzJmlkPTczNTIwCgpDSEFOR0VTIFNJTkNFIExBU1QgQUNUSU9OCiAgaHR0cHM6 Ly9yZXZpZXdzLmZyZWVic2Qub3JnL0QyNDkzNy9uZXcvCgpSRVZJU0lPTiBERVRBSUwKICBodHRw czovL3Jldmlld3MuZnJlZWJzZC5vcmcvRDI0OTM3CgpBRkZFQ1RFRCBGSUxFUwogIHN5cy9uZXQv aWZsaWIuYwoKQ0hBTkdFIERFVEFJTFMKCmRpZmYgLS1naXQgYS9zeXMvbmV0L2lmbGliLmMgYi9z eXMvbmV0L2lmbGliLmMKLS0tIGEvc3lzL25ldC9pZmxpYi5jCisrKyBiL3N5cy9uZXQvaWZsaWIu YwpAQCAtNTg2LDggKzU4NiwxMSBAQAogc3RhdGljIGludCBpZmxpYl9ub190eF9iYXRjaCA9IDA7 CiBTWVNDVExfSU5UKF9uZXRfaWZsaWIsIE9JRF9BVVRPLCBub190eF9iYXRjaCwgQ1RMRkxBR19S VywKIAkJICAgJmlmbGliX25vX3R4X2JhdGNoLCAwLCAibWluaW1pemUgdHJhbnNtaXQgbGF0ZW5j eSBhdCB0aGUgcG9zc2libGUgZXhwZW5zZSBvZiB0aHJvdWdocHV0Iik7CitpbnQgaWZsaWJfdHhf dXBkYXRlX2ZyZXEgPSBJRkxJQl9ERUZBVUxUX1RYX1VQREFURV9GUkVROworU1lTQ1RMX1VJTlQo X25ldF9pZmxpYiwgT0lEX0FVVE8sIHR4X3VwZGF0ZV9mcmVxLCBDVExGTEFHX1JXVFVOLAorCQkg ICAmaWZsaWJfdHhfdXBkYXRlX2ZyZXEsIElGTElCX0RFRkFVTFRfVFhfVVBEQVRFX0ZSRVEsCisJ CSAgICJ0cmFtc21pdCBkZXNjcmlwdG9yIHVwZGF0ZXMgcGVyIHNlY29uZCIpOwogCi0KICNpZiBJ RkxJQl9ERUJVR19DT1VOVEVSUwogCiBzdGF0aWMgaW50IGlmbGliX3R4X3NlZW47CkBAIC0xNzY4 LDggKzE3NzEsNyBAQAogCiAJLyogU2V0IG51bWJlciBvZiBkZXNjcmlwdG9ycyBhdmFpbGFibGUg Ki8KIAl0eHEtPmlmdF9xc3RhdHVzID0gSUZMSUJfUVVFVUVfSURMRTsKLQkvKiBYWFggbWFrZSBj b25maWd1cmFibGUgKi8KLQl0eHEtPmlmdF91cGRhdGVfZnJlcSA9IElGTElCX0RFRkFVTFRfVFhf VVBEQVRFX0ZSRVE7CisJdHhxLT5pZnRfdXBkYXRlX2ZyZXEgPSBpZmxpYl90eF91cGRhdGVfZnJl cTsKIAogCS8qIFJlc2V0IGluZGljZXMgKi8KIAl0eHEtPmlmdF9jaWR4X3Byb2Nlc3NlZCA9IDA7 CgoKCkVNQUlMIFBSRUZFUkVOQ0VTCiAgaHR0cHM6Ly9yZXZpZXdzLmZyZWVic2Qub3JnL3NldHRp bmdzL3BhbmVsL2VtYWlscHJlZmVyZW5jZXMvCgpUbzogbmVlbF9uZWVsYy5vcmcsIHNodXJkLCAj aWZsaWIKQ2M6IGdhbGxhdGluLCBhbGVrc2FuZHIuZmVkb3Jvdl9pdGdsb2JhbC5jb20sIGtvb2Jz LCBpbXAsIGFlLCBtZWxpZmFybywgI2NvbnRyaWJ1dG9yX3Jldmlld3NfYmFzZSwgZnJlZWJzZC1u ZXQtbGlzdCwgbW1hY3ksIGtwcmF2ZWVuLmxrbWxfZ21haWwuY29tLCBtYXJjbmFyY19nbWFpbC5j b20sIHNpbW9udmVsbGFfZ21haWwuY29tLCBub3ZpY2VfdGVjaGllLmNvbSwgdG9tbWkucGVybmls YV9pa2kuZmksIGtyenlzenRvZi5nYWxhemthX2ludGVsLmNvbQo= --b1_f3736609880045bfd89b16baf311cc95 Content-Type: text/x-patch; charset=utf-8; name="D24937.73520.patch" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="D24937.73520.patch" ZGlmZiAtLWdpdCBhL3N5cy9uZXQvaWZsaWIuYyBiL3N5cy9uZXQvaWZsaWIuYwotLS0gYS9zeXMv bmV0L2lmbGliLmMKKysrIGIvc3lzL25ldC9pZmxpYi5jCkBAIC01ODYsOCArNTg2LDExIEBACiBz dGF0aWMgaW50IGlmbGliX25vX3R4X2JhdGNoID0gMDsKIFNZU0NUTF9JTlQoX25ldF9pZmxpYiwg T0lEX0FVVE8sIG5vX3R4X2JhdGNoLCBDVExGTEFHX1JXLAogCQkgICAmaWZsaWJfbm9fdHhfYmF0 Y2gsIDAsICJtaW5pbWl6ZSB0cmFuc21pdCBsYXRlbmN5IGF0IHRoZSBwb3NzaWJsZSBleHBlbnNl IG9mIHRocm91Z2hwdXQiKTsKK2ludCBpZmxpYl90eF91cGRhdGVfZnJlcSA9IElGTElCX0RFRkFV TFRfVFhfVVBEQVRFX0ZSRVE7CitTWVNDVExfVUlOVChfbmV0X2lmbGliLCBPSURfQVVUTywgdHhf dXBkYXRlX2ZyZXEsIENUTEZMQUdfUldUVU4sCisJCSAgICZpZmxpYl90eF91cGRhdGVfZnJlcSwg SUZMSUJfREVGQVVMVF9UWF9VUERBVEVfRlJFUSwKKwkJICAgInRyYW1zbWl0IGRlc2NyaXB0b3Ig dXBkYXRlcyBwZXIgc2Vjb25kIik7CiAKLQogI2lmIElGTElCX0RFQlVHX0NPVU5URVJTCiAKIHN0 YXRpYyBpbnQgaWZsaWJfdHhfc2VlbjsKQEAgLTE3NjgsOCArMTc3MSw3IEBACiAKIAkvKiBTZXQg bnVtYmVyIG9mIGRlc2NyaXB0b3JzIGF2YWlsYWJsZSAqLwogCXR4cS0+aWZ0X3FzdGF0dXMgPSBJ RkxJQl9RVUVVRV9JRExFOwotCS8qIFhYWCBtYWtlIGNvbmZpZ3VyYWJsZSAqLwotCXR4cS0+aWZ0 X3VwZGF0ZV9mcmVxID0gSUZMSUJfREVGQVVMVF9UWF9VUERBVEVfRlJFUTsKKwl0eHEtPmlmdF91 cGRhdGVfZnJlcSA9IGlmbGliX3R4X3VwZGF0ZV9mcmVxOwogCiAJLyogUmVzZXQgaW5kaWNlcyAq LwogCXR4cS0+aWZ0X2NpZHhfcHJvY2Vzc2VkID0gMDsKCg== --b1_f3736609880045bfd89b16baf311cc95-- From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Jun 23 16:23:41 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DA65331DC5 for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 16:23:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49rs646h8nz3WwZ for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 16:23:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id E5613332290; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 16:23:40 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E52BD331DC3 for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 16:23:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49rs645sPYz3Wl9 for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 16:23:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C4BFE23441 for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 16:23:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 05NGNeHF004526 for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 16:23:40 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 05NGNeW2004523 for net@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 16:23:40 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 237649] Does not work receiving an IP address via DHCP after stable/12 (r346874-r347140) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 16:23:40 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: bin X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-qa, regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: john@saltant.com X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 16:23:41 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D237649 John W. O'Brien changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |john@saltant.com --- Comment #10 from John W. O'Brien --- I believe I can reproduce this on 12.1-RELEASE in a VNET jail. >From /etc/jail.conf (host) =3D=3D=3D=3D dhcptest1 { path =3D "/usr/jail/dhcptest1"; host.hostname =3D "dhcptest1.net.isc.upenn.edu"; vnet; vnet.interface =3D dhcp1; allow.raw_sockets; mount.fdescfs; devfs_ruleset =3D 40; } =3D=3D=3D=3D /etc/devfs.rules (host) =3D=3D=3D=3D [devfsrules_jail_bpf=3D40] add include $devfsrules_hide_all add include $devfsrules_unhide_basic add include $devfsrules_unhide_login add path zfs unhide add path 'bpf*' unhide own bpf* root:network perm bpf* 0660 =3D=3D=3D=3D /etc/rc.conf (jail) =3D=3D=3D=3D firewall_enable=3D"YES" firewall_type=3D"open" ifconfig_dhcp1=3D"DHCP" =3D=3D=3D=3D The relevant lines from /etc/network.subr toward the end of ifconfig_up() a= re: =3D=3D=3D=3D if dhcpif $1; then if [ $_cfg -ne 0 ] ; then ${IFCONFIG_CMD} $1 up fi if syncdhcpif $1; then /etc/rc.d/dhclient start $1 fi _cfg=3D0 fi =3D=3D=3D=3D This is the only place anywhere in /etc containing "dhclient start", and it only runs if the iface is set to "SYNCDHCP" or if synchronous_dhclient=3DYE= S. I cannot figure out how this ever worked as documented in the rc.conf manpa= ge, but I did find a clue in base r157706: "Allow the administrator to specify = if dhclient should be started when /etc/rc.d/netif configures the interface or only by devd." That suggests to me that devd is a requirement for async DHC= P, but I have not yet found what other configuration is required, nor what mig= ht have changed to trigger a latent bug. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Jun 24 08:20:46 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B255346C2B for ; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 08:20:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from melifaro@ipfw.ru) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49sGLP6B1Jz3VdY for ; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 08:20:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from melifaro@ipfw.ru) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id D1E343465E5; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 08:20:45 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D06E73467F2; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 08:20:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from melifaro@ipfw.ru) Received: from forward500p.mail.yandex.net (forward500p.mail.yandex.net [77.88.28.110]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49sGLN2j3Hz3Vsh; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 08:20:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from melifaro@ipfw.ru) Received: from mxback8o.mail.yandex.net (mxback8o.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:1a2d::22]) by forward500p.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 62A85940B16; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 11:20:41 +0300 (MSK) Received: from localhost (localhost [::1]) by mxback8o.mail.yandex.net (mxback/Yandex) with ESMTP id QJV6rwobR8-KerWhCQU; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 11:20:40 +0300 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ipfw.ru; s=mail; t=1592986840; bh=f7d0vSj8wXxc4JCNi+ONkiCbiSd/re0T4dC7cDc5sac=; h=Message-Id:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Date:References:To:From; b=MySw7sWzQVYXUn3bXAtZXCHfnoWfQpUtZG5+96PoT34NpCcT6VrYBOL/KJA431yM9 7DjR7Sx1iLNd5Led96bgBTzPemCJv0WZPPFwJ/hGsFcsKiyQnQ2cjNqyq6OEMtb2jx qgKLREptVrqH6o8Wylq/iBh8+iY526qduyY6LlMU= Received: by iva3-64eac1bc5e68.qloud-c.yandex.net with HTTP; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 11:20:40 +0300 From: Alexander V. Chernikov Envelope-From: melifaro@ipfw.ru To: Rodney W. Grimes Cc: "current@FreeBSD.org" , net , freebsd-hackers In-Reply-To: <202006221249.05MCnrKw010397@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> References: <273191592779927@mail.yandex.ru> <202006221249.05MCnrKw010397@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> Subject: Re: routed && route6d removal proposal MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Yamail [ http://yandex.ru ] 5.0 Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2020 09:20:40 +0100 Message-Id: <102621592983711@mail.yandex.ru> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49sGLN2j3Hz3Vsh X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=ipfw.ru header.s=mail header.b=MySw7sWz; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of melifaro@ipfw.ru designates 77.88.28.110 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=melifaro@ipfw.ru X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.44 / 15.00]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_SOME(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[ipfw.ru:s=mail]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.01)[-1.006]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:77.88.0.0/18]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[freebsd.org]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.98)[-0.983]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_GOOD(0.00)[77.88.28.110:from]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[ipfw.ru:+]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.15)[-1.149]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[melifaro@freebsd.org,melifaro@ipfw.ru]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[77.88.28.110:from]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:13238, ipnet:77.88.0.0/18, country:RU]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[melifaro@freebsd.org,melifaro@ipfw.ru] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2020 08:20:46 -0000 22.06.2020, 13:50, "Rodney W. Grimes" : >>  Hey, Hi Rodney, >> >>  I would like to propose removal of sbin/routed and usr.sbin/route6d. > > I disagree with removal, as your analysis is flawed. Thank you for the feedback! > >>  routed(8) is the daemon implementing RIPv2 routing protocol. >>  route6d(8) is the daemon implementing RIPng routing protocol for IPv6. >> >>  RIP [1] was one of the first protocols used in the networking. The first version was implemented back in 1982. > > RIPv1 was implemented in 1982, RIPv2 became RFC2453 in November 1998, and is a current and valid IETF standard, STD56. > It was updated by RFC4822 in February 2007. > >>  1. Network landscape has changed since then. BGP, OSPF, IS-ISIS and other routing protocols have been created and greatly improved over years. People have created and adopted numerous designs leveraging OSPF/ISIS or BGP. >>  RIP became obsolete a while ago as there were no competitive advantage it can offer. > >>  "It is the oldest routing protocol used by the network industry and is considered by many to be inefficient or border-line obsolete." ? [2], 2009 > > RIPv2 is not obosolete, and your reference is not authoritave on what is or is not an obsolete network protocol. Different people have different opinions :-) Let me rephrase the point I'm trying to make: RIP original design was created a long time ago. The current landscape is different: there are multiple protocols that are superset of RIP. There are multiple implementations of these protocols that are easily available. The configuration is not non-zero, but simple. Even further, more and more want their protocol daemon to have an api - and that makes implementations like goBGP extremely popular, moving people from "traditional" routing suites/daemons. With all that in mind, I see RIP popularity and usage going in only one direction. > I know of people using RIPv2 in networks. Collecting people feedback is the goal of this exercise. If there are existing users, then that's certainly a valid point in keeping the daemons in question. > >>  "Today, the only reason you might run across a network running RIPv2 is either that the network is very old and in serious need of an upgrade or the network is running cheaper, consumer-grade routing hardware that can only support RIP" ? [3], 2016. > > Or there simply is no need for anything more complicated. RipV2 is a very simple protocol and works fine for small networks in many settings. > >>  1.1. Nowadays the daemon name is simply misleading. Given situation described above, one does expect far wider functionality from the program named "route[6]d" than just RIP implementation. > > I'll agree the name is missleading, so change it, but removal on your false basis is not. > >>  2. Multiple routing stacks supporting all major routing protocol including RIP exists these days: bird, frr, quagga. Many BGP-only designs in are gaining popularity, so do bgp speakers such as exabgp or gobgp. Nowadays, if one needs dynamic routing on the host, OSPF or BGP speaker is the choice. FreeBSD packages contains well-maintained ports for these. Having RIP[ng] speakers in base offers no advantage. > > Routing stacks? You mean routing daemons? Forcing users to install bir, frr or quagga when all they need, or have been using for a long time is in base ripv2 is not good for users. Routing protocol suite, routing daemons, etc.. The question that I'm trying to get an answer for is the existence of these users :-) > >>  3. Both routed/route6d are largely unmaintained [4] and presents an additional attack vector. Here is the list of last non-trivial commits to routed/route6d: > > Whats unmaintained about code that has no need to change cause it just pretty much works? Yep, and then you get SA 14:21 or SA 20:12. > >>  sbin/routed: >>  r327276 - coverity >>  r317035 - rtsock fix >>  r299825 - coverity >>  r299822 - coverity, from netbsd >>  r299821 - coverity, from netbsd >>  r299784 - coverity, from netbsd >>  r299771 - coverify, from netbsd >>  r286347 - bugfix >>  r276602 - SA14:21 patch >>  r271919 - SA14:21 fix >>  r215702 - logic fix, 2010 >> >>  usr.sbin/route6d: >>  r337500 - functional fix, 2018 >>  r317035 - rtsock fix >>  r311994 - coverity >>  r311985 - coverity >>  r299869 - coverity >>  r299491 - coverity >>  r270234 - link-local fix >>  r243233 - functionality improvement, 2012 >> >>  To summarise: RIP protocol is obsolete, implementations for newer protocols exists in ports, implementation in base is unmaintained. >> >>  With all that in mind I propose to remove routed and route6d from base in FreeBSD 13. >>  Timeline: >>  June 5 - feedback aggregation and decision point >>  July 19 - removal (proposed) >> >>  [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Routing_Information_Protocol >>  [2] https://www.globalknowledge.com/ca-en/resources/resource-library/articles/basics-of-understanding-rip/ >>  [3] https://www.networkcomputing.com/data-centers/comparing-dynamic-routing-protocols >>  [4] https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=runnamed&list_id=361897&namedcmd=routed_prs >> >>  /Alexander >>  _______________________________________________ >>  freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list >>  https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net >>  To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > -- > Rod Grimes rgrimes@freebsd.org > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Jun 24 09:07:40 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97685348E2D for ; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 09:07:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from melifaro@ipfw.ru) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49sHNX110Xz3Ymn for ; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 09:07:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from melifaro@ipfw.ru) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 20CB8348BDA; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 09:07:40 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2028E348FA4; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 09:07:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from melifaro@ipfw.ru) Received: from forward500j.mail.yandex.net (forward500j.mail.yandex.net [5.45.198.250]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49sHNV4dV2z3YdD; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 09:07:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from melifaro@ipfw.ru) Received: from mxback21j.mail.yandex.net (mxback21j.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:1619::221]) by forward500j.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 6E07411C2840; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 12:07:35 +0300 (MSK) Received: from localhost (localhost [::1]) by mxback21j.mail.yandex.net (mxback/Yandex) with ESMTP id ZsHof0woJf-7YtGCEPv; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 12:07:34 +0300 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ipfw.ru; s=mail; t=1592989654; bh=5DAyeXxF8W/ysn2J0HhgPtFV7QA1SJudcJSlAlpnPGE=; h=Message-Id:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Date:References:To:From; b=u8bJytf/dmhQuURwpC+LSu/ZsgmsO9AhXtMgqRL0QRRUVh2ePs8y1a7ZpU3Y2a/JW 2MT+NRSF0OxvPBZyoqtg+67vwxCiPujmnrqUp3tCehiPNB37i6pwEz1Nve5uCkHHQD dWlnqm+gSejrTEGPf16qA8z17OFnl0hTj9kXoQmo= Received: by sas2-e9d1d6a5422a.qloud-c.yandex.net with HTTP; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 12:07:34 +0300 From: Alexander V. Chernikov Envelope-From: melifaro@ipfw.ru To: Hiroki Sato Cc: "current@freebsd.org" , "net@freebsd.org" , "freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org" In-Reply-To: <20200622.224621.1160033569666141710.hrs@FreeBSD.org> References: <273191592779927@mail.yandex.ru> <20200622.224621.1160033569666141710.hrs@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: routed && route6d removal proposal MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Yamail [ http://yandex.ru ] 5.0 Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2020 10:07:34 +0100 Message-Id: <113821592986861@mail.yandex.ru> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49sHNV4dV2z3YdD X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=ipfw.ru header.s=mail header.b=u8bJytf/; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of melifaro@ipfw.ru designates 5.45.198.250 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=melifaro@ipfw.ru X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.04 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_SOME(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[ipfw.ru:s=mail]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.03)[-1.030]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:5.45.192.0/19:c]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[freebsd.org]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-0.995]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[ipfw.ru:+]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.71)[-0.712]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[melifaro@freebsd.org,melifaro@ipfw.ru]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[5.45.198.250:from]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:13238, ipnet:5.45.192.0/18, country:RU]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[melifaro@freebsd.org,melifaro@ipfw.ru]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[5.45.198.250:from] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2020 09:07:40 -0000 22.06.2020, 14:54, "Hiroki Sato" : > "Alexander V. Chernikov" wrote >   in <273191592779927@mail.yandex.ru>: > > me> Hey, > me> > me> I would like to propose removal of sbin/routed and usr.sbin/route6d. > >  I am still using both of them in production environments because they >  work well at least for my configurations and most of promising >  alternatives are under GPL, not BSDL. That's actually a very good datapoint I certainly missed. > >  Why do we need to rush to remove them? Discussion about whether we There is no rush. In my opinion, popularity&usage of rip is going in one direction, for the reasons stated in the original e-mail. At some point in time it's worth checking the reality and verify whether we still need it in base or not. I stated 2 week timeframe (though I admit I wrongly written Jun instead of July) for collecting feedback to base a decision upon. It looks like there is enough feedback already. >  should keep or remove such old bits tends to be controversial when >  there is a user like me. I would agree with the removal if they were >  harmful or impossible to maintain, but would not for the reason that >  they are simply old and probably no one uses it today. Reason 1 and >  2 look like the latter at least to me. "too old to be worth keeping" >  is a matter of degree. Uucp, rlogind, and timed should be removed >  (and were removed) because there are few non-FreeBSD platforms which >  support these protocols. RIP is still widely supported---just like >  FTP, which nowadays no one prefers to use and major www browsers are >  about to drop the support of---and not be considered an inherently >  vulnerable protocol like telnet. And keeping these daemons is not >  harmful even for users who want to use third-party routing daemons >  you listed. My concern is hidden housekeeping costs. You have to update the documentation, where it exists. There are some bugs and you have to do something there. There are security vulns or Coverity reports. when you do a change, you have to verify it somehow and you have to tests, so you have to spend more time. Each of it is a small thing by itself, but they add up and drain developer time. > > me> 1.1. Nowadays the daemon name is simply misleading. Given situation > me> described above, one does expect far wider functionality from the > me> program named "route[6]d" than just RIP implementation. > >  I do not think this is a good reason to remove something nor people >  have got confused actually. If this is true, quagga or bird are much >  worse. > > me> 2. Multiple routing stacks supporting all major routing protocol > me> including RIP exists these days: bird, frr, quagga. Many BGP-only > me> designs in are gaining popularity, so do bgp speakers such as exabgp > me> or gobgp. Nowadays, if one needs dynamic routing on the host, OSPF or > me> BGP speaker is the choice. FreeBSD packages contains well-maintained > me> ports for these. Having RIP[ng] speakers in base offers no advantage. > me> > me> 3. Both routed/route6d are largely unmaintained [4] and presents an > me> additional attack vector. Here is the list of last non-trivial commits > me> to routed/route6d: > >  I think this is a separate issue. What attack vectors which are >  known to be vulnerable do they have? I'm referring to the cases like SA 14:21 or SA 20:12. > >  The small commit counts are not equal to its unreliability. Older >  daemons such as ppp(8), dhclient(8), ftpd(8), or bootpd(8) have >  received few substantial changes in recent years because they are >  mature. Well, I see another alternative reason, but that's another discussion :-) Also, dhclient got 50 commits in the last 4 years, so I wouldn't put it in this list. > >  I am not a strong protester and will be happy to keep them as ports >  if everyone wants to remove them and it will happen, but I would like >  consistent criteria on removing software in the base system (they do >  not need to be perfect nor strict, though). I believe harmfulness is My criteria (briefly) is the "moral" staleness, existence of the viable alternatives and no users. I should have stated the latter more explicitly. >  more important than the fact that it is old or we have more choices >  in the ports tree. If we have negative factors on maintaining them, >  removing them would be one of the choices as a result. If the >  existing routed/route6d makes difficulty on people who want to use >  third-party routing daemons, it should be fixed. These kind of >  harmfulness look below the threshold to me at this moment though I >  may be biased because I am still using them today... > > -- Hiroki From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Jun 24 12:12:18 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35E4E34D161 for ; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 12:12:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Marc.Daniels@allexpoeventors.com) Received: from IND01-BO1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-eopbgr1390048.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.139.48]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.protection.outlook.com", Issuer "GlobalSign Organization Validation CA - SHA256 - G3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49sMTX6m0Jz440W for ; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 12:12:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Marc.Daniels@allexpoeventors.com) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=BqJoosQYf368xQkJ2XQaQdfxy2QQ1q+Pcg74y/qWoAiBUWik7iPiCzt7wGM6f010eDyQgROt9bvfYUWbnUGOaz37zx5kOzfH43esPheaYyLmOf5jmYG+pLlUaJkGhmL/iqkSJbdxINTs83Demp1ykuWqMslCpbsWQYXZNzlPg9Xr//Oo79+ktxbWYBM69Iu4KwPjkhNbDIasWn2v1XJ+/EEdLHKEBE6dJ3DA7n/B++Ap4IpZVUhcU5ARZbvIWHVPdSGEUnBl0B56MPwR2g4V9jxFIdIJetOEPhafWGcLtn6wSosBwVyTcbVfJH0ajVNpI52Q4eVH19YMpTQAP4MYkw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=pQUauHq7dNozh/JUcnD+Ob+5TLH5Dd+EFD39z/hSB6k=; b=kcKQp4MPQGsTYMX9nJj5ulbMJOh0L8y/1p+LnxGLDJjiFStZcceRAIdHorjbzfLf796dLksrLNVe4SisAtrFSgqTTGG35rLOuhTSKSik8fuzlrOL3amEo3NVwOpzNb6vLGQu/Wu7tD0qJQP2j8ngBcpzRJ2ZrxMh9N/x7LccLEkhDc8E085WoD7jLfKJh9Xe4RY7oRE0OJsPBPWoHoBfO5igfoor8fs8sDMg9PPcaUONSsbu+7uQzS2TAxTjxzebXfQ0dxjQi+0DR33x6OSlBcp0Ch28P8/tAooS0bZ+tJ95NHbHDn+Wp11OtChg8nbALv9IHr+DE2bUlDY5IuNRbA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=allexpoeventors.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=allexpoeventors.com; dkim=pass header.d=allexpoeventors.com; arc=none Received: from BMXPR01MB3765.INDPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (2603:1096:b00:5e::18) by BMXPR01MB2597.INDPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (2603:1096:b00:2d::14) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3109.23; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 12:12:13 +0000 Received: from BMXPR01MB3765.INDPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM ([fe80::714c:b29a:a295:d1d3]) by BMXPR01MB3765.INDPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM ([fe80::714c:b29a:a295:d1d3%3]) with mapi id 15.20.3109.027; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 12:12:13 +0000 From: "Marc Daniels" To: "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" Subject: Attendees Profiles of Southern California 2020 Linux Expo Thread-Topic: Attendees Profiles of Southern California 2020 Linux Expo Thread-Index: AdZKIK9aF5oSfJaMS2eGyf+/nu3F2A== Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2020 12:12:13 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [49.207.195.200] x-ms-publictraffictype: Email x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: f5d4d144-a921-4980-2f65-08d81837d46c x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BMXPR01MB2597: x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:5516; x-forefront-prvs: 0444EB1997 x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1 x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: RIdp+WcK477+C7WTzr1+124QBfpdeQMTSW3ITYDPUbdEYYZdzBjssepvmJLi0AVU9Aro1AUmyAXVt9gp/XN55PsmAo5+MIX/x+0wS6FxfQtukChV1irEirOViGnL4xw5bsBuO07R0e6mft/uD9RatVv9ZmzuqNUxuE9tiJisHYdtN/GZtqE53mbscpojqiVDt4d276dB4HwXvEw22QCvC0MmyjEi0/D3Vkhhi3Y2Ge6rukqlsD8+i8XyK8lzG9d48M+GTxNmOQfpOqJjJcxjWZ7NvSRS3aLHQkd71d1GripBhJLZDhlYhekvhxh3qci0C2mC4PLaerOd+0iOzHaPI0FY2HhQOnpH5cNhLHw3np68fsqBuJkzS0V0htHDjVf+ x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:BMXPR01MB3765.INDPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFTY:; SFS:(376002)(366004)(346002)(39860400002)(136003)(396003)(86362001)(4744005)(33656002)(9326002)(9686003)(186003)(5660300002)(55016002)(66446008)(66946007)(478600001)(316002)(76116006)(66476007)(8676002)(64756008)(66556008)(52536014)(6506007)(26005)(6916009)(71200400001)(8936002)(55236004)(2906002)(7696005)(130980200001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: OzhvrBAaRxofQEhtWGhIOY+ffSTwaLFWITL4s+ykjQxIOvHKWnfFBtB2va82jpT6LfRUJ5pYN5lAg0xwG/MdIArjiQIYoiVQlOlkC5j6SyDl6QDeURkP9ccX0byXQkFSSpszOIiBOQTvd52npxVY4DzIfIuufTxouC8QgiTAA4OHgzuPyE9kftZ2nMeZBIxWJgNI36g+kCi4pufVQ3dMQEc4/fb4hgi/IHkbWxV8BvUnyPYExX38TpRCj0VpN3k+3hW1A5NsihLq8bhFVpMLKwLu7Sd4W3pKHcj2PIV+OFhdnpJ6ZCaqZoWqES+FbUDb92L+hk53LmHkbuhSqT5pCLOBovUaSkT7dKU4mKCWodgyDsdvq61OYBLaCP394jgL7/hF92CqNzI8NZkj4syFtfHEfqfYLw/Z6zEo4yPmCC9slrl+q1C7vcOijo6pRwt6zulRLx8IVEq0ZrebfMEhedy9BgJOhySLEM/LSL32GSI= x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: allexpoeventors.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: f5d4d144-a921-4980-2f65-08d81837d46c X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 24 Jun 2020 12:12:13.8833 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: abd25a89-100d-4c7b-b197-c57cc5160745 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: DOokmorpDJyUNr2k/FIfvezFilSB684UF5adkoDP8oAVwCtHZdjHoTGBTY8Kpzplfgclr981alKB1zZOrxlrBWlAPL5Yx4kKOP5I3a8Tl+3+6SIq/bi7XKAhGeneBYf+ X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BMXPR01MB2597 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49sMTX6m0Jz440W X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of Marc.Daniels@allexpoeventors.com designates 40.107.139.48 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=Marc.Daniels@allexpoeventors.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.32 / 15.00]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.95)[-0.954]; ARC_ALLOW(-1.00)[microsoft.com:s=arcselector9901:i=1]; HAS_XOIP(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:40.107.0.0/16]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[allexpoeventors.com]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.96)[-0.959]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[40.107.139.48:from]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.01)[-0.011]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_NAME_EXCESS_SPACE(1.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:8075, ipnet:40.104.0.0/14, country:US]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[40.107.139.48:from] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.33 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2020 12:12:18 -0000 Hi, I am following up to check if you are interested in the Pre-registered atte= ndees List. Event Name: Southern California 2020 Linux Expo Date: Mar 05 - Mar 08, 2020 Place: Pasadena Convention Center, Los Angeles, California Attendees Counts: 4,327 Let me know your interest to get back with pricing & more info. Thank you and I look forward to hearing from you. Regards, Marc Daniels Sr. Marketing Analyst From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Jun 24 16:35:49 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D441A352D1B for ; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 16:35:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsd-lists@BSDforge.com) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49sTKd4YhZz4N0g for ; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 16:35:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsd-lists@BSDforge.com) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 9A383352B88; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 16:35:49 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98C47352A53; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 16:35:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsd-lists@BSDforge.com) Received: from udns.ultimatedns.net (static-24-113-41-81.wavecable.com [24.113.41.81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "ultimatedns.net", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49sTKd1Y0Xz4Mgq; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 16:35:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsd-lists@BSDforge.com) Received: from udns.ultimatedns.net (localhost [IPv6:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:1]) by udns.ultimatedns.net (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 05OGa8DH047122 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 24 Jun 2020 09:36:14 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bsd-lists@BSDforge.com) X-Mailer: Cypht MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: "current@freebsd.org" , "net@freebsd.org" , "freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org" In-Reply-To: <113821592986861@mail.yandex.ru> From: Chris Reply-To: bsd-lists@BSDforge.com To: "Alexander V. Chernikov" , "Rodney W. Grimes" , Hiroki Sato Subject: Re: routed && route6d removal proposal Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2020 09:36:14 -0700 Message-Id: <4dfcc0c99086b023a1508e5a7f60a0af@udns.ultimatedns.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49sTKd1Y0Xz4Mgq X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.00 / 15.00]; ASN(0.00)[asn:11404, ipnet:24.113.0.0/16, country:US]; local_wl_ip(0.00)[24.113.41.81] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2020 16:35:49 -0000 On Wed, 24 Jun 2020 10:07:34 +0100 Alexander V=2E Chernikov melifaro@freebsd=2E= org said > 22=2E06=2E2020, 14:54, "Hiroki Sato" : > > "Alexander V=2E Chernikov" wrote > > =C2=A0=C2=A0in <273191592779927@mail=2Eyandex=2Eru>: > > > > me> Hey, > > me> > > me> I would like to propose removal of sbin/routed and usr=2Esbin/route6d= =2E Please don't=2E > > > > =C2=A0I am still using both of them in production environments because = they > > =C2=A0work well at least for my configurations and most of promising > > =C2=A0alternatives are under GPL, not BSDL=2E +1 on this=2E I began using this around FreeBSD 6, and continued using it through 9=2E I also chose this as a solution for several of my clients=2E I use it because it's "cheap" -- simple, lightweight, and dependable=2E With near zero maintenance -- and it's already available in $BASE=2E While fairly utilitaria= n by today's standards=2E Sometimes you just need to get the job done, and this does just that=2E Which IMHO makes this a shinning star=2E Please don't remove this=2E It's going to make the lives of others a little more difficult=2E Thanks for taking time time to read=2E > That's actually a very good datapoint I certainly missed=2E > > > > =C2=A0Why do we need to rush to remove them? Discussion about whether w= e > There is no rush=2E In my opinion, popularity&usage of rip is going in one > direction, for the reasons stated in the original e-mail=2E > At some point in time it's worth checking the reality and verify whether = we > still need it in base or not=2E > I stated 2 week timeframe (though I admit I wrongly written Jun instead o= f > July) for collecting feedback to base a decision upon=2E > It looks like there is enough feedback already=2E > > =C2=A0should keep or remove such old bits tends to be controversial whe= n > > =C2=A0there is a user like me=2E I would agree with the removal if they w= ere > > =C2=A0harmful or impossible to maintain, but would not for the reason t= hat > > =C2=A0they are simply old and probably no one uses it today=2E Reason 1 a= nd > > =C2=A02 look like the latter at least to me=2E "too old to be worth keepi= ng" > > =C2=A0is a matter of degree=2E Uucp, rlogind, and timed should be removed > > =C2=A0(and were removed) because there are few non-FreeBSD platforms wh= ich > > =C2=A0support these protocols=2E RIP is still widely supported---just lik= e > > =C2=A0FTP, which nowadays no one prefers to use and major www browsers = are > > =C2=A0about to drop the support of---and not be considered an inherentl= y > > =C2=A0vulnerable protocol like telnet=2E And keeping these daemons is not > > =C2=A0harmful even for users who want to use third-party routing daemon= s > > =C2=A0you listed=2E > My concern is hidden housekeeping costs=2E You have to update the > documentation, where > it exists=2E There are some bugs and you have to do something there=2E There = are > security vulns or Coverity reports=2E > when you do a change, you have to verify it somehow and you have to tests= , > so you have to spend more time=2E > Each of it is a small thing by itself, but they add up and drain develope= r > time=2E >=20 > > > > me> 1=2E1=2E Nowadays the daemon name is simply misleading=2E Given situation > > me> described above, one does expect far wider functionality from the > > me> program named "route[6]d" than just RIP implementation=2E > > > > =C2=A0I do not think this is a good reason to remove something nor peop= le > > =C2=A0have got confused actually=2E If this is true, quagga or bird are m= uch > > =C2=A0worse=2E > > > > me> 2=2E Multiple routing stacks supporting all major routing protocol > > me> including RIP exists these days: bird, frr, quagga=2E Many BGP-only > > me> designs in are gaining popularity, so do bgp speakers such as exabg= p > > me> or gobgp=2E Nowadays, if one needs dynamic routing on the host, OSPF = or > > me> BGP speaker is the choice=2E FreeBSD packages contains well-maintaine= d > > me> ports for these=2E Having RIP[ng] speakers in base offers no advantag= e=2E > > me> > > me> 3=2E Both routed/route6d are largely unmaintained [4] and presents an > > me> additional attack vector=2E Here is the list of last non-trivial comm= its > > me> to routed/route6d: > > > > =C2=A0I think this is a separate issue=2E What attack vectors which are > > =C2=A0known to be vulnerable do they have? > I'm referring to the cases like SA 14:21 or SA 20:12=2E > > > > =C2=A0The small commit counts are not equal to its unreliability=2E Older > > =C2=A0daemons such as ppp(8), dhclient(8), ftpd(8), or bootpd(8) have > > =C2=A0received few substantial changes in recent years because they are > > =C2=A0mature=2E > Well, I see another alternative reason, but that's another discussion :-) > Also, dhclient got 50 commits in the last 4 years, so I wouldn't put it i= n > this list=2E > > > > =C2=A0I am not a strong protester and will be happy to keep them as por= ts > > =C2=A0if everyone wants to remove them and it will happen, but I would = like > > =C2=A0consistent criteria on removing software in the base system (they= do > > =C2=A0not need to be perfect nor strict, though)=2E I believe harmfulness= is > My criteria (briefly) is the "moral" staleness, existence of the viable > alternatives and no users=2E > I should have stated the latter more explicitly=2E > > =C2=A0more important than the fact that it is old or we have more choic= es > > =C2=A0in the ports tree=2E If we have negative factors on maintaining the= m, > > =C2=A0removing them would be one of the choices as a result=2E If the > > =C2=A0existing routed/route6d makes difficulty on people who want to us= e > > =C2=A0third-party routing daemons, it should be fixed=2E These kind of > > =C2=A0harmfulness look below the threshold to me at this moment though = I > > =C2=A0may be biased because I am still using them today=2E=2E=2E > > > > -- Hiroki --Chris From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Jun 24 17:09:29 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8010353F08 for ; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 17:09:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daemon-user@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49sV4T5DkNz4Q81; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 17:09:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daemon-user@freebsd.org) Received: from reviews.nyi.freebsd.org (reviews.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:607c::16:b]) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD6131512F; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 17:09:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daemon-user@freebsd.org) Received: by reviews.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1346) id AC93C1FE68E; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 17:09:29 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2020 17:09:29 +0000 To: Phabricator From: "markj (Mark Johnston)" Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Reply-to: "markj (Mark Johnston)" Subject: [Differential] D24937: Add tunable net.iflib.tx_update_freq to set transmit descriptor update frequency Message-ID: <7dc9276a29b6e940ac19ba50186b6235@localhost.localdomain> X-Priority: 3 X-Phabricator-Sent-This-Message: Yes X-Mail-Transport-Agent: MetaMTA X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-Phabricator-Mail-Tags: , X-Herald-Rules: <28>, <81>, <89>, <128>, <67>, <118>, <110>, <124> X-Phabricator-Projects: <#network> X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: Precedence: bulk Thread-Topic: PHID-DREV-sjntqne4ry32ikjhkxqq X-Phabricator-Mail-ID: 2015958 X-Phabricator-Send-Attempt: mklc2a6dnatup7h2 In-Reply-To: References: Thread-Index: Yzk3NzA0OWVmYTYyZDNhMjkzN2NhZDQyMjkyIF7ziMk= X-Phabricator-Stamps: actor(@markj) application(Differential) author(@neel_neelc.org) blocking-reviewer(#iflib) herald(H28) herald(H67) herald(H81) herald(H89) herald(H110) herald(H118) herald(H124) herald(H128) monogram(D24937) object-type(DREV) phid(PHID-DREV-sjntqne4ry32ikjhkxqq) reviewer(#iflib) reviewer(@shurd) revision-repository(rS) revision-status(needs-review) subscriber(#contributor_reviews_base) subscriber(@ae) subscriber(@aleksandr.fedorov_itglobal.com) subscriber(@freebsd-net-list) subscriber(@gallatin) subscriber(@imp) subscriber(@koobs) subscriber(@markj) subscriber(@melifaro) tag(#network) via(web) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2020 17:09:30 -0000 bWFya2ogYWRkZWQgaW5saW5lIGNvbW1lbnRzLgoKSU5MSU5FIENPTU1FTlRTCgo+IGFsZWtzYW5k ci5mZWRvcm92X2l0Z2xvYmFsLmNvbSB3cm90ZSBpbiBpZmxpYi5jOjI5MTYKPiBJIGFtIHdvcnJp ZWQgdGhhdCBpZiB0aGUgdXNlciBzZXRzIHRoZSB2YWx1ZSB0byAxLCB0aGVuIHRoaXMgd2lsbCBs ZWFkIHRvIGRpdmlzaW9uIGJ5IHplcm8gYW5kIHRvIGtlcm5lbCBwYW5pYy4gSSB0aGluayBhZGRp dGlvbmFsIGNoZWNrcyBhcmUgbmVlZGVkLgoKV2VsbCwgdGhlIGRpdmlzaW9uIGlzIHBlcmZvcm1l ZCBmaXJzdCwgc28gdGhlIG9ubHkgdmFsdWUgdGhhdCBzaG91bGQgY2F1c2UgYSBwYW5pYyBpcyAw LCBidXQgeWVzLCB3ZSBuZWVkIGEgc3lzY3RsIGhhbmRsZXIgdG8gdmFsaWRhdGUgdGhpcy4gVGhl IHRyaWNreSB0aGluZyBpcyB0aGF0IHRoZSBzZXQgb2YgdmFsaWQgdmFsdWVzIGZvciBpZnRfdXBk YXRlX2ZyZXEgZGVwZW5kcyBvbiB0aGUgc2l6ZSBvZiB0aGUgaGFyZHdhcmUgdHJhbnNtaXQgcXVl dWVzLCB3aGljaCBvZiBjb3Vyc2UgY2FuIHZhcnkuIFNvIGl0J3Mgbm90IGNsZWFyIHRvIG1lIHRo YXQgYSBnbG9iYWwgc3lzY3RsIHJlYWxseSBtYWtlcyBzZW5zZS4KCj4gaWZsaWIuYzo1ODkKPiAg CQkgICAmaWZsaWJfbm9fdHhfYmF0Y2gsIDAsICJtaW5pbWl6ZSB0cmFuc21pdCBsYXRlbmN5IGF0 IHRoZSBwb3NzaWJsZSBleHBlbnNlIG9mIHRocm91Z2hwdXQiKTsKPiAraW50IGlmbGliX3R4X3Vw ZGF0ZV9mcmVxID0gSUZMSUJfREVGQVVMVF9UWF9VUERBVEVfRlJFUTsKPiArU1lTQ1RMX1VJTlQo X25ldF9pZmxpYiwgT0lEX0FVVE8sIHR4X3VwZGF0ZV9mcmVxLCBDVExGTEFHX1JXVFVOLAoKTm90 ZSwgaWZ0X3VwZGF0ZV9mcmVxIGhhcyB0eXBlIHVpbnQ4X3QuCgo+IGlmbGliLmM6NTkyCj4gKwkJ ICAgJmlmbGliX3R4X3VwZGF0ZV9mcmVxLCBJRkxJQl9ERUZBVUxUX1RYX1VQREFURV9GUkVRLAo+ ICsJCSAgICJ0cmFtc21pdCBkZXNjcmlwdG9yIHVwZGF0ZXMgcGVyIHNlY29uZCIpOwo+ICAKClRo ZSBkZXNjcmlwdGlvbiBpcyB3cm9uZy4gRnJvbSBteSByZWFkaW5nIG9mIHRoZSBjb2RlLCB3aGlj aCBtYXkgYmUgaW5jb3JyZWN0LCB0aGlzIHR1bmFibGUgcmVhbGx5IGNvbnRyb2xzIHRoZSBudW1i ZXIgb2Ygb3V0c3RhbmRpbmcgYnVmZmVycyBxdWV1ZWQgZm9yIHRyYW5zbWl0IGJlZm9yZSB3ZSBt YWtlIHRoZW0gdmlzaWJsZSB0byB0aGUgaGFyZHdhcmUuIEl0IGFsc28gY29udHJvbHMgdGhlIHJh dGUgYXQgd2hpY2ggdGhlIGhhcmR3YXJlIHdpbGwgZ2VuZXJhdGUgaW50ZXJydXB0cyBpbiByZXNw b25zZSB0byBjb21wbGV0ZWQgdHJhbnNtaXRzLiBUaGUgcHJlY2lzZSByZWxhdGlvbnNoaXAgaXMg aGFyZCB0byBleHBsYWluLgoKUkVQT1NJVE9SWQogIHJTIEZyZWVCU0Qgc3JjIHJlcG9zaXRvcnkK CkNIQU5HRVMgU0lOQ0UgTEFTVCBBQ1RJT04KICBodHRwczovL3Jldmlld3MuZnJlZWJzZC5vcmcv RDI0OTM3L25ldy8KClJFVklTSU9OIERFVEFJTAogIGh0dHBzOi8vcmV2aWV3cy5mcmVlYnNkLm9y Zy9EMjQ5MzcKCkVNQUlMIFBSRUZFUkVOQ0VTCiAgaHR0cHM6Ly9yZXZpZXdzLmZyZWVic2Qub3Jn L3NldHRpbmdzL3BhbmVsL2VtYWlscHJlZmVyZW5jZXMvCgpUbzogbmVlbF9uZWVsYy5vcmcsIHNo dXJkLCAjaWZsaWIKQ2M6IG1hcmtqLCBnYWxsYXRpbiwgYWxla3NhbmRyLmZlZG9yb3ZfaXRnbG9i YWwuY29tLCBrb29icywgaW1wLCBhZSwgbWVsaWZhcm8sICNjb250cmlidXRvcl9yZXZpZXdzX2Jh c2UsIGZyZWVic2QtbmV0LWxpc3QsIG1tYWN5LCBrcHJhdmVlbi5sa21sX2dtYWlsLmNvbSwgbWFy Y25hcmNfZ21haWwuY29tLCBzaW1vbnZlbGxhX2dtYWlsLmNvbSwgbm92aWNlX3RlY2hpZS5jb20s IHRvbW1pLnBlcm5pbGFfaWtpLmZpLCBrcnp5c3p0b2YuZ2FsYXprYV9pbnRlbC5jb20K From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Jun 24 17:48:47 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F3E035506A for ; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 17:48:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49sVxl3sxlz4dNQ for ; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 17:48:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 3F8AD354FEF; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 17:48:41 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C2D9354FED; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 17:48:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Received: from hz.grosbein.net (hz.grosbein.net [IPv6:2a01:4f8:c2c:26d8::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "hz.grosbein.net", Issuer "hz.grosbein.net" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49sVxd69Jfz4dFn; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 17:48:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Received: from eg.sd.rdtc.ru (eg.sd.rdtc.ru [IPv6:2a03:3100:c:13:0:0:0:5]) by hz.grosbein.net (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 05OHmM8f047240 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 24 Jun 2020 17:48:25 GMT (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) X-Envelope-From: eugen@grosbein.net X-Envelope-To: melifaro@freebsd.org Received: from [10.58.0.10] (dadv@dadvw [10.58.0.10]) by eg.sd.rdtc.ru (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 05OHmIuO055258 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Thu, 25 Jun 2020 00:48:18 +0700 (+07) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Subject: Re: routed && route6d removal proposal To: "Alexander V. Chernikov" , "Rodney W. Grimes" References: <273191592779927@mail.yandex.ru> <202006221249.05MCnrKw010397@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> <102621592983711@mail.yandex.ru> Cc: net , freebsd-hackers From: Eugene Grosbein Message-ID: Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2020 00:48:15 +0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <102621592983711@mail.yandex.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,LOCAL_FROM, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Report: * -2.3 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record * -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record * 2.6 LOCAL_FROM From my domains X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on hz.grosbein.net X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49sVxd69Jfz4dFn X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=permerror (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of eugen@grosbein.net uses mechanism not recognized by this client) smtp.mailfrom=eugen@grosbein.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.38 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.51)[-0.515]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.73)[-0.730]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[grosbein.net]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_PERMFAIL(0.00)[empty SPF record]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.04)[-0.039]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:2a01:4f8::/29, country:DE]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2020 17:48:47 -0000 24.06.2020 15:20, Alexander V. Chernikov wrote: > Different people have different opinions :-) > Let me rephrase the point I'm trying to make: RIP original design was created a long time ago. The current landscape is different: there are multiple protocols that are superset of RIP. There are multiple implementations of these protocols that are easily available. The configuration is not non-zero, but simple. > Even further, more and more want their protocol daemon to have an api - and that makes implementations like goBGP extremely popular, moving people from "traditional" routing suites/daemons. > With all that in mind, I see RIP popularity and usage going in only one direction. Btw, I do use RIPv2 in production these days (but with ripd, not routed) and I have several reasons to do so. First, RIPv2 is distance-vector protocol and has some advantages over OSPF for small-diameter but geographically distributed network (dictinct cities inter-connected with tunnels) as it does not require existence of "inseparable" backbone. RIPv2 offers richer ways to route filtering and/or preferring that you can achieve with OSPF only if you create distinct area for each router :-) Next, with years I came to decision running both OSPF and RIPv2 in parallel without route redistribution. This doubles my work initially at configuration stage but provides me with some protection against software failures. I can easily stop, debug and restart one of routing daemons while another one still runs so network has connectivity. From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu Jun 25 02:09:14 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0452D349B69 for ; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 02:09:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list_freebsd@bluerosetech.com) Received: from echo.brtsvcs.net (echo.brtsvcs.net [IPv6:2607:f740:c::4ae]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49sk3F1nLDz4MqC for ; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 02:09:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list_freebsd@bluerosetech.com) Received: from chombo.houseloki.net (65-100-43-2.dia.static.qwest.net [65.100.43.2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client CN "chombo.houseloki.net", Issuer "brtsvcs.net CA" (verified OK)) by echo.brtsvcs.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 888CF38D16 for ; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 02:09:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [IPv6:2602:41:642b:630:890b:ed43:f6ce:c9be] (unknown [IPv6:2602:41:642b:630:890b:ed43:f6ce:c9be]) by chombo.houseloki.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 300E6A453 for ; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 19:09:06 -0700 (PDT) From: Mel Pilgrim Subject: RealTek 2.5 GbE (RTL8125) support? To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Message-ID: Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2020 19:09:06 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49sk3F1nLDz4MqC X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of list_freebsd@bluerosetech.com designates 2607:f740:c::4ae as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=list_freebsd@bluerosetech.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.77 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx:relay3.brtsvcs.net:c]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-net@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.81)[-0.815]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[bluerosetech.com]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.05)[0.046]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.70)[-0.705]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:36236, ipnet:2607:f740:c::/48, country:US]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2020 02:09:14 -0000 Are RealTek 2.5 GbE NICs (RTL8125) supported? I don't see RLT8125 parts listed in if_re(4) or if_re.c, and that appears to be the only driver for RealTek gigabit NICs? From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu Jun 25 07:32:15 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3390835405F for ; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 07:32:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jayan.park@scorpb2bevents.com) Received: from IND01-BO1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-eopbgr1390048.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.139.48]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.protection.outlook.com", Issuer "GlobalSign Organization Validation CA - SHA256 - G3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49ssCx6mCSz3V9Y for ; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 07:32:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jayan.park@scorpb2bevents.com) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=kxDfGtDD3GVaElS2bahxuQhmWZ5RHDm4EGO3if3RtL50w5zb2NqRouuOTgKNVptdItppoV8+teyMcL6vRuMsyjhoCPoQB83+yewisVMi8cWCGl/t5bBjWAV8yu14/AP56Krxy2RdEPVQdFQjrBTLhS/wnbYa+H3TxAXYP8wwHCOP9YVRpES3Yq9TCO7N2XkWhnhOyva05FMWvOezZJ9saFtLfsbu887m1DK6uQk3dbSJ+9NposOQ6phLTcjDHDNqgnVWjxwElcsmQvrXodoYp3HluN1uL+XMJJb3BvGdz9XAPlam7DMBwghjbUvt+wi1inmUK+pz+MpLgz3iXxTcqw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=rhKEV2pqkLYT0vHTZS2/ZTakJHzgjCo7OBL8WfpSydw=; b=nc2nQpqDVVNEZpZ3U4SXafLP7fG44NN39p44h70Ngx6UHpbBZiedk2Q+2GREJZ+nvWsyKVEnDSuqPmEuZf5xBxlMkSyf3JpacdaqKMqsWtLxWqsUErTylaJ7bs66c+qiPbMrJixqexGluL4yAiIUYl+9N0bQXT7SlEyIfUYmVubT2lkSUJVUqUWn/Qlm9v/PD11KHCA0Jmj3kSEC8Nq33m0NVW66V3SNAGY2ZyEMfgCc3xst/yACgSOCgRTa/IZZxFcrUdKZqkuHfK8QkUXcQyaiMho+eeRGOinJNgXgmAZxMwSKLv0rxrqcKtXfFUnOURveWpnffrQn5Icym2IhmQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=scorpb2bevents.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=scorpb2bevents.com; dkim=pass header.d=scorpb2bevents.com; arc=none Received: from BM1PR01MB2308.INDPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (2603:1096:b00:48::13) by BMXPR01MB3285.INDPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (2603:1096:b00:5b::18) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3109.22; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 07:32:09 +0000 Received: from BM1PR01MB2308.INDPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM ([fe80::1dfe:e39e:cd0c:60fb]) by BM1PR01MB2308.INDPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM ([fe80::1dfe:e39e:cd0c:60fb%3]) with mapi id 15.20.3131.020; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 07:32:09 +0000 From: "Jayna Park" To: "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" Subject: Attendees Profiles of Southern California 2020 Linux Expo Thread-Topic: Attendees Profiles of Southern California 2020 Linux Expo Thread-Index: AdZKwrrxvzPfVXOjTTWVmfhsNZMaFw== Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2020 07:32:09 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [106.51.243.217] x-ms-publictraffictype: Email x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 8b719114-4e00-4714-a994-08d818d9deb6 x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BMXPR01MB3285: x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:9508; x-forefront-prvs: 0445A82F82 x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1 x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: GNf//visnNcUHyJSFjBN0eabVjUPTGNnrJQX0Zvg7ksB0d3WWXTsBepI60EAXxigdGhzSi/4UnEbDJagnpGl2jyngS2YZE8J58l8o72sUQc9D/8/fHbv7KqCc0DO40CCaf4GrsrzxBDvH7g9c9r3SEsIsDTa+pQ/vm8G/llXMECo6MZdespyJmA/V8Im/Hd587og0zl7iYSSMqaZR9A0V1+JGrs2F09lQZGQf06+tv4qflq/HThEczaVyQn1tpdGAYbW+HuThb5PabWBjCnsiEwCUR7B7Q+2nsGyQU8Xh9JUIMF+kw45wXB0FV+StADAznjPR+Dy2UOAA3hfAzxNYE1B7HahfbtFHUAjP7HXKVsgHJyyyHlcxwy+KFVz1M6BaRwbkZy6wxkD1nYekeDepxrXUx+thHcXWESs1i/yJss= x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:BM1PR01MB2308.INDPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFTY:; SFS:(39860400002)(366004)(396003)(136003)(376002)(34096005)(346002)(448600002)(33656002)(55236004)(26005)(6506007)(71200400001)(52536014)(5660300002)(64756008)(7696005)(8676002)(76116006)(66476007)(66446008)(66946007)(66556008)(19273905006)(2906002)(86362001)(6916009)(55016002)(8936002)(9686003)(38610400001)(586005)(186003)(9326002)(4744005)(102460200006)(130980200001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: 3kL7ffNItrcBCBEYwHnIhwMBwEN4KbNEQ+VUL5ha4dNNkMKzevjd6eS2O/2/sgb4IcorUWYVjHlauVKNssfWb0yi5H3l2Ijudrjfrey/dsKA9R0I5MHpWFnN9DhY35YNz+buRdwDMGLjeFzehJXbPYVIImzlxXWC/BHUHDwIVNpWH3oYwMH4KMgvrGOLdX0K4CxtfrtdF1zV1ok5ZFIJSELqDdM282wvGs110vqAto46xZnLLm3iLwVCE1H2OZLmX4GuJ6Cp4xNnLcvZ91ESJjmQzVheRQqmF89l8+yVwjWKLxruN/0KdIg09Hquncwspr2go0I4n493/aE2S0UPK59pOavUbyvPDKIRtMQvR77pqnxsuZ3JWI4klUBpxzEPT7vVTId50BVxz2cDqA80fFkObCG4CE9MSmgaLCWDyhrD5iS4deDAY8nOOyVnOKLzBds0Dx+O3YINj/L5W741UAhe4Eyg6Dcb8p3yFGUw0gs= x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: scorpb2bevents.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 8b719114-4e00-4714-a994-08d818d9deb6 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 25 Jun 2020 07:32:09.5438 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5c843991-f41b-479b-b2a8-cc643328bef2 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: prl+TNZLFLbbrlkp/SLPqF+I5SXqJL+ZnZ6/MW9/wUjo0ZKb6VxzCbtY3TXILGS6PGhgxd/H5/4nXKT9Qxp1vjnOssejd0JXVO5+guYuUcU= X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BMXPR01MB3285 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49ssCx6mCSz3V9Y X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of jayan.park@scorpb2bevents.com designates 40.107.139.48 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=jayan.park@scorpb2bevents.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.77 / 15.00]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.81)[-0.814]; HAS_XOIP(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:40.107.0.0/16]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[scorpb2bevents.com]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.95)[-0.954]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[40.107.139.48:from]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.60)[-0.602]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[40.107.139.48:from]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_NAME_EXCESS_SPACE(1.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:8075, ipnet:40.104.0.0/14, country:US]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; ARC_ALLOW(-1.00)[microsoft.com:s=arcselector9901:i=1] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.33 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2020 07:32:15 -0000 Hi Hope you're doing good! I am writing in regards to see if you're interested in acquiring the Visito= rs List? Event Details: "Southern California 2020 Linux Geo /Date: Los Angeles, California, Mar 05 - Mar 08, 2020" Counts:4327 Each Record in the list contains: Business Name, Email Address, Phone NO, J= ob Title. Let me know your interest, so that we can send more details as well as pric= ing details for your review. Regards, Jayan Park -Business Analyst ________________________________ If you do not wish to receive future emails from us please reply as 'leave= out'. From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu Jun 25 13:50:18 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7779B35B4B3 for ; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 13:50:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from noreply@track-my-url.com) Received: from berra-155.mfzt.com (berra-155.mfzt.com [178.18.201.155]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49t1c96QXHz45p9 for ; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 13:50:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from noreply@track-my-url.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=key2; d=mfzt.com; h=To:Subject:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:MIME-Version:List-Unsubscribe:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; bh=vKJGwczOKGYj6uRc/mIuKQme1Lk=; b=GDC/9wq5S1OaBrJS8x1F68GIqPJ0Bb2WnG8eobldnd5TJrbgGFvv/y3GHFO1oxhd0cKa6jeqAxbo GxSrFvEWq7W167atRbtC4ZeMOKAUcL//URLdpgckPsYIdPtNqxoVDcyQ+9lquIBvXeBWt6jiZlDf YsE4AC5m5xMz6s3LsMY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; q=dns; s=key2; d=tspb.org.tr; b=KwKb9AwKcjHB0JKsf9D3anAqbzGAu0mRf4Co0GAbuOnShVlrzyuvdumFBeLQ7mtAccfmcCn/pIHR fktMXzCEgLY4DD82p5F92l6zvhyTReHHuUN4en8nGf3UBwq0uSpkZCIMu6SdQdt5iMrURC9V7ar6 3oHMiRh7IWbLENY3B5w=; To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: =?UTF-8?B?Q09WSUQgMTkgSUZSUyBLYXBzYW3EsW5kYWtpIE1hbGkgVGFibG9sYXJhIEV0a2lzaQ==?= Message-ID: Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2020 13:24:23 +0000 From: "=?UTF-8?B?VMO8cmtpeWUgU2VybWF5ZSBQaXlhc2FsYXLEsSBCaXJsacSfaQ==?=" Reply-To: info@tspb.org.tr MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer-LID: 469 X-Mailer-RecptId: 2389711 X-Mailer-SID: 5242 X-Mailer-Sent-By: 15 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49t1c96QXHz45p9 X-Spamd-Bar: +++++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=mfzt.com header.s=key2 header.b=GDC/9wq5; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed), DKIM not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=tspb.org.tr (policy=none); spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of noreply@track-my-url.com designates 178.18.201.155 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=noreply@track-my-url.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [5.51 / 15.00]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[info@tspb.org.tr]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:178.18.201.158/29:c]; REPLYTO_ADDR_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[mfzt.com:+]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[info@tspb.org.tr,noreply@track-my-url.com]; RCVD_COUNT_ZERO(0.00)[0]; AUTOGEN_PHP_SPAMMY(1.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; R_MIXED_CHARSET(1.76)[subject]; HAS_INTERSPIRE_SIG(1.00)[]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[info@tspb.org.tr,noreply@track-my-url.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:50941, ipnet:178.18.201.0/24, country:TR]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.42)[-0.421]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[mfzt.com:s=key2]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.68)[0.679]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; HAS_PHPMAILER_SIG(0.00)[]; HAS_LIST_UNSUB(-0.01)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; MANY_INVISIBLE_PARTS(0.10)[2]; PHISHING(1.11)[tspb.org.tr->email-bouncer.com]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.39)[0.387]; GREYLIST(0.00)[pass,body]; DMARC_POLICY_SOFTFAIL(0.10)[tspb.org.tr : SPF not aligned (relaxed), DKIM not aligned (relaxed), none] Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.33 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2020 13:50:18 -0000 TSPB Birlikte Eğitim Mesleki Gelişim Eğitimleri Bülteni Daha İyi Görüntülemek İçin Tıklayın [http://track-3.email-bouncer.com/1110D2389711|00109c00fdf926bb981d59ee664f79715a6a|11105242|0111469|01112374.html]TSPB Birlikte Eğitim Mesleki Gelişim Eğitimleri "COVID 19 IFRS Kapsamındaki Mali Tablolara Etkisi" - Online Eğitim"Zoom"uygulaması üzerinden gerçekleştirilecektir. Eğitimin 25 kişilik kontenjanı bulunmaktadır. Başvurularını gerçekleştirilen katılımcılara online eğitime giriş için gerekli bilgiler iletilecektir. Başvuru için: www.tspb.org.tr [http://track-3.email-bouncer.com/0001L2389711|10015242|100122069|0110T.html] Üyelik ve başvurularınızla ilgili sorularınız için: info@birlikteeğitim.org [mailto:info@birlikteeğitim.org] ve ya aşağıdaki telefon numarasından bize ulaşabilirsiniz. Eğitmen: Prof. Dr. Barış Sipahi-Marmara Üniversitesi-İşletme Fakültesi Eğitim Tarihi: 14 Temmuz 2020 Eğitim Süresi: ½ Gün Ders Saati: 13:30-17:30 Eğitim Ücreti: 200 TL (KDV dahil, kişi başı) Eğitim Yeri: Online Eğitim-Zoom Başvuru: www.tspb.org.tr [http://track-3.email-bouncer.com/0011L2389711|00115242|101022069|1101T.html] TSPB Birlikte Eğitim Büyükdere Caddesi No: 173 1.Levent Plaza A Blok Kat4 Şişli-İstanbul Telefon: 0212 280 85 67 info@birlikteegitim.org [mailto:info@birlikteegitim.org] www.tspb.org.tr [http://track-3.email-bouncer.com/0010L2389711|11005242|00105892|0110T.html] IFRS 'in genel yapısı nedir? Covid 19'un etkileyeceği IFRS standartları nelerdir? Covid 19 ile ilgili IFRS kapsamında bilinmesi gerekenler nelerdir? Covid 19 'un dipnotlara etkisi nelerdir? Covid 19'un mali tablolara etkisi nedir? 14 Temmuz 2020 tarihinde "COVID 19 IFRS Kapsamındaki Mali Tablolara Etkisi" online eğitimimize bekliyoruz. EĞİTİM KONULARI IAS 2 Stok Standardı Kapsamında Değerlendirilmesi IAS 10 Bilanço Tarihinden Sonra Meydana Gelen Olaylar Standardı Kapsamında Değerlendirilmesi IAS 12 Gelir Vergileri Standardı Kapsamında Değerlendirilmesi IAS 36 Varlıklarda Değer Düşüklüğü Standardı Kapsamında Değerlendirilmesi IFRS 9 Finansal Araçlar Standardı Kapsamında Değerlendirilmesi IFRS 15 Hasılat Standardı Kapsamında Değerlendirilmesi Bu e-posta tarafınıza TSPB tarafından oluşturulan üye veritabanına kayıtlı olduğunuz için gönderilmiştir.Beni bu listeden çıkar [http://track-3.email-bouncer.com/0110U2389711|01109c00fdf926bb981d59ee664f79715a6a|1000469|11005242.html] From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu Jun 25 15:43:22 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1021A35D7F9 for ; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 15:43:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utilit-grade@absean.com) Received: from rdns0.absean.com (hwsrv-744317.hostwindsdns.com [192.129.188.197]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49t46d5VPBz4Dlh for ; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 15:43:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utilit-grade@absean.com) From: WeTransfer To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Your document transfer expires today Date: 25 Jun 2020 15:43:11 +0000 Message-ID: <20200625154311.2ED7EB31766C5B24@absean.com> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49t46d5VPBz4Dlh X-Spamd-Bar: / X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.08 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.74)[-0.744]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[absean.com:s=default]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; HFILTER_HOSTNAME_2(1.00)[hwsrv-744317.hostwindsdns.com]; ZERO_FONT(0.10)[1]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.87)[-0.873]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; MANY_INVISIBLE_PARTS(0.20)[3]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[absean.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[absean.com,reject]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.06)[-0.059]; MIME_HTML_ONLY(0.20)[]; RCVD_COUNT_ZERO(0.00)[0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:~]; R_NO_SPACE_IN_FROM(1.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:54290, ipnet:192.129.188.0/23, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.33 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2020 15:43:22 -0000 From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu Jun 25 15:57:44 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EA0135E90C for ; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 15:57:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49t4RD3GVYz4FWk for ; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 15:57:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 6E69135E90B; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 15:57:44 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E2C835E4DC for ; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 15:57:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49t4RD2LhPz4FT4 for ; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 15:57:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C24425452 for ; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 15:57:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 05PFvi6b099286 for ; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 15:57:44 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 05PFvifF099285 for net@FreeBSD.org; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 15:57:44 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 246951] carp(4): Active CARP member crashes: panic, trap_pfault, ip_input || ip_output when using ipSec, AES-NI (on Intel I350) Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2020 15:57:44 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.3-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: crash, needs-qa, regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: igor-fbsdbugs@grinchenko.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: mfc-stable12? mfc-stable11? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2020 15:57:44 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D246951 igor-fbsdbugs@grinchenko.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |igor-fbsdbugs@grinchenko.or | |g --- Comment #11 from igor-fbsdbugs@grinchenko.org --- unfortunately dtrace is not available on pfsense. is there another way to g= et the refcounts? I can confirm, however, that it does take a few days for this crash to happ= en. usually within 4-8 days, but never immediately. I have a handful of crash backtraces from previous crashes. I will paste the first 3 few lines from each. let me know if you need the entire dumps: Tracing pid 12 tid 100285 td 0xfffff8000ccf6620 ip_input() at ip_input+0x60e/frame 0xfffffe0451afee70 netisr_dispatch_src() at netisr_dispatch_src+0xa8/frame 0xfffffe0451afeec0 ether_demux() at ether_demux+0x173/frame 0xfffffe0451afeef0 Tracing pid 12 tid 100263 td 0xfffff8000c88f620 ip_output() at ip_output+0x1418/frame 0xfffffe0451a15a60 ipsec_process_done() at ipsec_process_done+0x1c8/frame 0xfffffe0451a15ab0 esp_output_cb() at esp_output_cb+0xeb/frame 0xfffffe0451a15b10 db:0:kdb.enter.default> bt Tracing pid 12 tid 100283 td 0xfffff8000c67b000 ip_output() at ip_output+0x1418/frame 0xfffffe0451af4a60 ipsec_process_done() at ipsec_process_done+0x1c8/frame 0xfffffe0451af4ab0 esp_output_cb() at esp_output_cb+0xeb/frame 0xfffffe0451af4b10 Tracing pid 12 tid 100270 td 0xfffff8000c8cf000 ip_input() at ip_input+0x60e/frame 0xfffffe0451a38e70 netisr_dispatch_src() at netisr_dispatch_src+0xa8/frame 0xfffffe0451a38ec0 ether_demux() at ether_demux+0x173/frame 0xfffffe0451a38ef0 Tracing pid 12 tid 100267 td 0xfffff8000c3f3620 ip_input() at ip_input+0x60e/frame 0xfffffe0451a29e70 netisr_dispatch_src() at netisr_dispatch_src+0xa8/frame 0xfffffe0451a29ec0 ether_demux() at ether_demux+0x173/frame 0xfffffe0451a29ef0 Tracing pid 18 tid 100138 td 0xfffff800085d1620 ip_output() at ip_output+0x1418/frame 0xfffffe044f4181c0 ipsec_process_done() at ipsec_process_done+0x1c8/frame 0xfffffe044f418210 esp_output_cb() at esp_output_cb+0xeb/frame 0xfffffe044f418270 Tracing pid 12 tid 100264 td 0xfffff8000c15f000 in_broadcast() at in_broadcast+0x43/frame 0xfffffe0451a1ac40 ip_output() at ip_output+0x7be/frame 0xfffffe0451a1ad70 ip_forward() at ip_forward+0x2b5/frame 0xfffffe0451a1ae10 our pfsense host is relatively busy pushing about 300mbit of traffic throug= h, with about half of it to the ipsec tunnel. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu Jun 25 18:23:44 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F388341506 for ; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 18:23:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from flo@smeets.xyz) Received: from mail-out.smeets.xyz (mail-out.smeets.xyz [IPv6:2a01:4f8:10a:3543::25:11]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49t7gf6Xnpz4Q2g for ; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 18:23:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from flo@smeets.xyz) Received: from mail.smeets.xyz (mail.smeets.xyz [IPv6:2a01:4f8:10a:3543::25:3]) by mail-out.smeets.xyz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0224D41DC9; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 20:23:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: from amavis.smeets.xyz (amavis.smeets.xyz [IPv6:2a01:4f8:10a:3543::aa:4]) by mail.smeets.xyz (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF953B05B7; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 20:23:33 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at smeets.xyz Received: from mail.smeets.xyz ([IPv6:2a01:4f8:10a:3543::25:3]) by amavis.smeets.xyz (amavis.smeets.xyz [IPv6:2a01:4f8:10a:3543::aa:4]) (amavisd-new, port 10025) with ESMTP id cV3K6-2vi45X; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 20:23:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: from nibbler.home.lan (p5df56051.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [93.245.96.81]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mail.smeets.xyz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 24EFFB05AD; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 20:23:33 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: RealTek 2.5 GbE (RTL8125) support? To: Mel Pilgrim , freebsd-net@freebsd.org References: From: Florian Smeets Autocrypt: addr=flo@smeets.xyz; keydata= mQINBFpyBwsBEADLq0c46orEtbMn4SptX+VJxR1wB4YwaErZme1bqF4nZHIhlRNET22HsHdQ doagaB4uACq0Rj5kHcu614ZnnNkLPyCxWQATx+cbdiFO4/hfT8tAvKnBtiy3awKJ5uGCNO2E zJwXW6KwdDA8XPRySqN8m1yPl+dW0Cls+/vO/QL/6+YLMupmEpSvFxRzAZTQuKyX4+xl+dYI d24JiPd1yfCuDNOY3+OZ3QBMT00u/699N8lUWRtiTwaQMwAOww8r/26YM6/SgcgFuLH2E/CV plY0sDvfoISlAj8agxdomNXfPjCMQ6w5yGZmA+huFpPCVBTi3on/SWgbQO7dLVpN4BNPuScP osCb/dsOg0S74zCClsIU3gdUGh9rwJY00/Ebid6V0R3c1Czwbg8LQedzlGDuXYXmzp6W2ujg r1cqbUD6lUWikUv2IMdCbb8MxYhHLi3GYUs5Xpi+W7vM6T45KbuMr7O/1SjtcGOlNeDvGNgj cDk20fOgPPZ+M6i9vX5Q2oI9HoYaeTiYNwILkBLVP/L40kTo5EkiQOt4OW6BMbylqXPOaQMW uGVbmhCJQpbx8Vo80s2yiBBVWkLkWQIcIm3KZlLldJqKEFpQBWLBE1eFFqboYgAWzFn73CaV 5tihobijMmmOV3a8cI1fI4kREyl3g+8bW+O0u3m3tuzVOpDpjwARAQABtB9GbG9yaWFuIFNt ZWV0cyA8ZmxvQHNtZWV0cy54eXo+iQJXBBMBCgBBAhsDBQkHhh+ABQsJCAcDBRUKCQgLBRYD AgEAAh4BAheAFiEE7LNouHkIv7aRTXJp71uk3NWp88AFAlpyB1gCGQEACgkQ71uk3NWp88DB 8RAAuwXf65kTtVwDAJEFnXQmRx8q/bfV5WWMVVZMM9zMOmLM006PlJlns9vDEwfXkUsTOKpC 9GEREdCVxsqQ/WqYrO0O8yLYRMY0IQ6w2B5cVzvf1DwY6Foc7zOpEgvAt5mCR9BoJ1eHf90K rHYUxf8AaWjJ/CE4EdN4wDvEY23tQ1ov0ReiNZokKfKKRF8rRbBhpwRcRyzV4eah3WvKKyOy PIGKquXG0GWhgty3rfNtion8AomFoQlK0lCq57okQj0HLS3vLTzXexvfWsLc+nLXT8eo87cl MQaYz7h5EjqM0r4FPRmGJ18nQ5wArt5vOf5oRv90RSH3QJLaxVdvt0BCDr2s1J5tTG7gZP/r Kyz9BrPtVvBwiHEW8jhw4lDbV3xIUEVkj4UEsM9XkHrHqd8JiFNZZOPE25VkuAeoeyB3j9km fZczF/f41cHp5v5RyTavta9QWA6Q07ARPu2JCBMMN+lJ9G/Ok8JlUgSGOwHZ+3R7jjvDMEFh 4DJhF2B77DdLxpLVJS0h5cS8WM6a/jm1Sk6DAi4bgksetvdyE/N/yxQmHokdKYW2LGDgd7cw dM2X660avFRe4ogZ0PeLRimPbyJuSN2+hZC/fy5jEv5PvZ+6spuwYMYDClefRpvBDqmCCxtf M1LNFRiXjdYvUdHvQ3facDzNpOkPLp0VexjJJ2G5Ag0EWnIHCwEQANHrOm5vydK/ij1zkDyL Zzbogk5zjMh6oAr3cH4oGbJHPLlyFZTCVBYUwD4kh6NV1sKuZOeX/aygyVg1RyLulnzsc6Yj XOIxlqhqQwGI8k8ssAIpMSf029781CNF2HC42CrJeHtXNONDNOjsMuoxzga9zLQCh4jLTlE/ TUJo6KVABWBVRtTVh2Z77pKtN7j2NPFBHvp7K0WHfV+TYnlsgjhUA0ACZnUdHS2YRzBhCzzQ eludxBz54S9xbUq1mfZfVx8AbAGXF2zxo68nvvAAJn48HiBS3dMhCGYJDdZdja6QdUFPiemi nOxwkUzCqmKxm+Aj7USue1SbZZqJxmMI1eF4Ork/BJJI74Z/FnJgYR4UkEiD3J/KUocQCIH3 daB1+/CXlh99Ib7AP+QGuKk3vnNHh7VBq3E+VAiM5LU0BmgW+cdRPHkiwM7sDa2VnV3VqvV7 QmoMKnHFzUB6Nn8uE+iakp5J81Pr68kDOq7kLW3UnGmg1PUqbsnCaTimJb3JAYWzOW/9CYcP lbAdIqi+wH7MOoeL+PA99A3kW/881rGmeOYFzzrsNVLtea+AJfXtp4LN5gOVIPIpovCNSVXX EKgl7a4vjUGzVBzrH7PzT+k4XUEQwNCACfGZxEExtny19bjvumZ0rv+AEAHvsWSKXHUVJzIN jqd9UioaEbKGAPlPABEBAAGJAjwEGAEKACYWIQTss2i4eQi/tpFNcmnvW6Tc1anzwAUCWnIH CwIbDAUJB4YfgAAKCRDvW6Tc1anzwM/8D/9IbDzMvsz4O+Gcz1oUx4IMxbQDw99qgJexR5cj W207GkRnKVJ0zqx7Xc+U3AytniuwqHEXeV4qIqP6h14pEuCqdRJ+fSm65rB4+ZdeM2Y5YYvU BByOM78Mbs6SZy2k5X0EL5FXjNVIMOv2ImblyeRWhWK6gCfc/l7kV1EYVx9LV3umsc7K+ceZ lfE1U8hWbie8r7tl3V9ggF2g1cyc9ru0qW3sg8D4vNTS1uwdqeccKRc3osrVw4WrW1nGxTmT TCqVYGHjF2sANF9o1JB93hoXz8lydmDdhJ/62/XHapeT1FB8m7gulinM33VeOCCjN+dUgLQk 5tAGg+iHQWhC4Q/o4m0OqfdcSYdhCJ7h2I4GwOoGaxzoXqEL47Guxz+zE4osAFP5JLxCTbi2 x5sduCvxx3WbO95kZJKp7D0BIKpbKcfkyWse53YBI9wSrkIil+InnqvSDzU9nMvIyKSjv4ui wvZi1HY7tPiir/P2naZaiQ1SAM0KLP3g123WcnhRKo++ZRHhay5/70SKGdxEmKf3nld8xNCs 9EIWOTpRaqc9+zOcD1zVTZwnwgBrnPqzfPW9+d7FwAP1MdJbrROuC2bfzNZyoR4uHAnDOyNW wGSmShv7hhdettO8dJblneTY8vhzxo36pWmojEdgghXNw9Ji7kyInAmWq9kwV5Vou3ZNFw== Message-ID: <8f0a8fc3-fa68-d2eb-b29e-f4da04ba5c26@smeets.xyz> Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2020 20:23:31 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.0; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="DGqb3sAqZbNjQCJTJHTE03qldmd5R1e62" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49t7gf6Xnpz4Q2g X-Spamd-Bar: ---- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.27 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.997]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.98)[-0.984]; MIME_GOOD(-0.20)[multipart/signed,multipart/mixed,text/plain]; HAS_ATTACHMENT(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.49)[-0.487]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[smeets.xyz,reject]; SIGNED_PGP(-2.00)[]; RCVD_NO_TLS_LAST(0.10)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:+,3:~]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:2a01:4f8::/29, country:DE]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[93.245.96.81:received] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2020 18:23:44 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --DGqb3sAqZbNjQCJTJHTE03qldmd5R1e62 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="JcHMlonAFmiAAEOfh70u4q8WkR0Rnvwk7" --JcHMlonAFmiAAEOfh70u4q8WkR0Rnvwk7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 25.06.20 04:09, Mel Pilgrim wrote: > Are RealTek 2.5 GbE NICs (RTL8125) supported?=C2=A0 I don't see RLT8125= parts > listed in if_re(4) or if_re.c, and that appears to be the only driver > for RealTek gigabit NICs? I have one of these in my PC and it's not recognized on 13.0/head. Florian --JcHMlonAFmiAAEOfh70u4q8WkR0Rnvwk7-- --DGqb3sAqZbNjQCJTJHTE03qldmd5R1e62 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQKTBAEBCgB9FiEE7LNouHkIv7aRTXJp71uk3NWp88AFAl7066RfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldEVD QjM2OEI4NzkwOEJGQjY5MTRENzI2OUVGNUJBNERDRDVBOUYzQzAACgkQ71uk3NWp 88COTA//XiIqP9ozAwj4LkpGqeaDuJOamZFQM5Czecs+Z6WuXVw4N3f2cIwRdt1h eMrwQshcgM/svCs0Fh1k3mSmvNq8CZGPdiYFWr+cWzG1lRtPxEdmw/MT2U0r+w0Z IkjNe9BH5ytmCGCtlj7Ap+7s/ixFCNvFCMyEfx7PjIVTi/eJEzw/c/jbxSBWRQK/ ob/oGQ5qvWEm9BtSBdJMQ1YRyL8SMymsUEMWAoD2DbC023UcWoEU+Bmk48H1szIw oNPi0AJHr6DWoCl4nIwLLxmF2U0NwGw5d9WKUMLR+w+I1WG0qCOxF7e172d0oEH6 YuYrwlF2rw6wA+CdaWJFNvzrQFV59itRoprvvqXA5SX4F5+ikUtn9IvrPfvY4dCy FPbyChSVl2FOM3Fw7iI3EWZJX9nYaZVmGJ1C5aaGXhRl5L9DaL1qE9DjYHpmi9cN GqFMA1dkQoBLO3Eb+jsTD2+LlsI8Ro7qdO2Xtm3R/zo9QHle0xxLUnG5Egw5BvT0 9xCr5jIHh+XDaBJ4KlHGKqtg2U42L9qtMxVj6fXeCpKxdWVoRaQ5KCbCvKUZ/Vt6 15QODTL2K6z7B7F4LelDEw2byTJcP9FnY+T9SDt7db1oVEpECS7dqjr05k5qEUBC Ky0whcUB/9zDiHfXyIuRdTHttisrqKb1gL50+d+w1z76jgXSme4= =fyfJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --DGqb3sAqZbNjQCJTJHTE03qldmd5R1e62-- From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Jun 26 19:53:07 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A17FA35E6E4 for ; Fri, 26 Jun 2020 19:53:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qv1-xf2b.google.com (mail-qv1-xf2b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::f2b]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49tncL4mHRz3XvC for ; Fri, 26 Jun 2020 19:53:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com) Received: by mail-qv1-xf2b.google.com with SMTP id g11so5042185qvs.2 for ; Fri, 26 Jun 2020 12:53:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=urPSOjtUZV5dP5mg4NrHFBr6gNDXyuqBy0RJZXEkpso=; b=r4Md9Mmx04wLv2f1BZTtp08aPhq04SQxqlhQOVn703TCENQGcU7R3SD7ViMIesG4tc K+sdnHjO+EGa2RFi9KvdlHTI2Rxb02NkTL1hvv3LrmGOEhlMvLOo1urEhCge26BzI/j7 cc21SeS6/nguYic7E2iQ+y1CyeDvaQn6iULSwQQHnB2o7H84L4hlOt6rnPPm2cJ/zLr5 Ooi65lLzH88OuTM693l1h1w3UJIbLvnduIoOpATsbmEb1fXvH3iY34H/860WFlKMEzJ/ SSa7nNY9E3dizdgeJYfECrG8srccJMScJO9Q3EUll+8hzW4PDS/l8r6VryUUj1AXoxrQ oi6Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=urPSOjtUZV5dP5mg4NrHFBr6gNDXyuqBy0RJZXEkpso=; b=qsENUROJTUIw3XtFlHA5lIwZwK43VNqbvm+YV4gHpZJBgfwKSfoKtelPskKmvXihBT qaiEDob8B/dpRhsnqHtrQkWunNaAoRIxqb8nA+bOO8JxwHrbgIMYWIbLNFdjk55D0Irn gvJlFjMgpBF7DvipsMVS+r1J3rjFEtzhYwcbOnWPExqDI6lzDLh8S+SgCaSfi7lrJhTA 2Q77gkd42CtOiXUu6y6dz01eN6GL2kslf6hrz2UWZ/JOGbgTQp8jJzfXlvwFiC5PTfaR assTCBV0vo3ZR1ZkubXMsq6AJfCI6qYNcJQErgcLrNk16jH765dG6sChaeaZPuuXGK6B g4IA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM53257mSLnWXiKECkQ851nNgMjNBuczvpFW66t+sLZaEfAgf1G8ft hPxoqSuz0T5Mpwcu5ktXtPbyyhaDLuUOn692nZ3JuA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxcxhZyl+SKYhB48gDPc2a8WTRqLzzuJQeKNAULdL7iRGtKzV1aKCOITYLgku6tNoeoMUVjWGMIJoMjEN59Ej8= X-Received: by 2002:a0c:e1c3:: with SMTP id v3mr3708483qvl.209.1593201185675; Fri, 26 Jun 2020 12:53:05 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <07f4e7f5-095e-e89e-2c55-d283ca62149c@druid.net> In-Reply-To: From: Adrian Chadd Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2020 12:52:52 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: WiFi hotspot keeps dropping To: "D'Arcy Cain" Cc: FreeBSD Net X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49tncL4mHRz3XvC X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=r4Md9Mmx; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of adrianchadd@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::f2b as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=adrianchadd@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.72 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.01)[-1.005]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com:dkim]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36:c]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-net@freebsd.org]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.04)[-1.035]; URI_COUNT_ODD(1.00)[1]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::f2b:from]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.68)[-0.681]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.33 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2020 19:53:07 -0000 OH wow, I only JUST saw this, sorry! On Sun, 21 Jun 2020 at 03:40, D'Arcy Cain wrote: > On 2020-06-19 12:14, Adrian Chadd wrote: > > [snip] Also, did you plug in something USB-3 related recently? :-) > > > > USB-3 / USB-C's signaling frequency interferes with 2.4GHz :-) > > No. The only USB-C I have is my phone which I have never plugged into the > computer. > > Here's another data point. It seems that I don't necessarily have to > restart hostapd. If I do "ifconfig wlan0 scan" it comes back as well. > > Ok, when it next happens, do this: sysctl dev.ath.0.forcebstuck=1 .. that forces a stuck beacon event, which resets the NIC. I wonder if the problem is the NIC is now deaf. I fixed some issues in FreeBSD-HEAD around noise floor calibration failures which led to NIC deafness, but you won't even SEE that debugging unless you've compiled a custom kernel with the above options. Please let me know if you need any help compiling up a custom kernel. -adrian -- > D'Arcy J.M. Cain | Democracy is three wolves > http://www.druid.net/darcy/ | and a sheep voting on > +1 416 788 2246 (DoD#0082) (eNTP) | what's for dinner. > IM: darcy@VybeNetworks.com, VoIP: sip:darcy@druid.net > >