From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sun Aug 23 10:38:53 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85B563B94D0 for ; Sun, 23 Aug 2020 10:38:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BZBZ533BQz4X1s for ; Sun, 23 Aug 2020 10:38:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 68A013B92ED; Sun, 23 Aug 2020 10:38:53 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 686473B92EC for ; Sun, 23 Aug 2020 10:38:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BZBZ52DQmz4Wwl for ; Sun, 23 Aug 2020 10:38:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3081225F1F for ; Sun, 23 Aug 2020 10:38:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 07NAcrYC038357 for ; Sun, 23 Aug 2020 10:38:53 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 07NAcrrw038356 for net@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 23 Aug 2020 10:38:53 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 241958] Enable option TCPHPTS in the kernel causes a large % of interruptions if there is no HPET eventtimer in the system Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2020 10:38:51 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.1-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: performance X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: koobs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: tuexen@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: mfc-stable12+ X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: flagtypes.name Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2020 10:38:53 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D241958 Kubilay Kocak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|mfc-stable12? |mfc-stable12+ --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sun Aug 23 15:43:13 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B2283C0D55 for ; Sun, 23 Aug 2020 15:43:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BZKKF0Q2Tz3XqX for ; Sun, 23 Aug 2020 15:43:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 0DFCD3C0D54; Sun, 23 Aug 2020 15:43:13 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DC9B3C0D53 for ; Sun, 23 Aug 2020 15:43:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BZKKD6gJ6z3XKG for ; Sun, 23 Aug 2020 15:43:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C9B0C9670 for ; Sun, 23 Aug 2020 15:43:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 07NFhCTv072200 for ; Sun, 23 Aug 2020 15:43:12 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 07NFhC5Z072199 for net@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 23 Aug 2020 15:43:12 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 246660] Sporadic LACP Lagg Flap Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2020 15:43:11 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.1-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: nonesuch@longcount.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2020 15:43:13 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D246660 --- Comment #2 from nonesuch@longcount.org --- Alex I have a span port setup on each switch going into a tap / agg switch that feeds a corvil packet capture box. From the corvil I can pull the traffic by mac and look at what was going on using wireshark going back about 3 weeks. Second thing I did was capture the details from net.link.lagg.lacp.debug = =3D 1.=20 Looking a the two sources i can see the Freebsd side of things seams to mis= s a beat, by slowing down somehow . I am not exactly sure how or why this is happening.=20=20=20 So far I have two ideas why this is going on. In 11 something the sysctl net.link.lagg.default_use_flowid was changed from a default of 1 to 0 .=20 I suspect this can be causing the issue. Setting use flowid to 1 appears to keep all of the arp, lacp and non ip protocols on queue 0 . This prioritizes the traffic enough to make the kernel lcap bits respond fast enough.=20 Here is the post about the lacp change. Maybe we can ping someone from Multiplay . https://www.mail-archive.com/svn-src-all@freebsd.org/msg155156.html --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sun Aug 23 19:56:58 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBC2E3C810E; Sun, 23 Aug 2020 19:56:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Richard.Scheffenegger@netapp.com) Received: from NAM12-DM6-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-dm6nam12on20618.outbound.protection.outlook.com [IPv6:2a01:111:f400:fe59::618]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.protection.outlook.com", Issuer "GlobalSign Organization Validation CA - SHA256 - G3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BZQxy2RNwz4LYl; Sun, 23 Aug 2020 19:56:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Richard.Scheffenegger@netapp.com) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=YKv4GZEsKRpaJNkHMwrh67ej5BAWKYiqaQO/gTMG8UX+eiugQPhTr0rMtJEJc9qvmDU5yov3tX0KXPhl3uBI3aOFIw5SyCxgi234Oc/UI8L63JWBQcm67ZIw57hDhbBM3H1KGnTTmCus1+smRQ60ux1dFmTLZ1zKY0CXOkSw2ZrAQjG1fEYYucBJiej8ekDVNXPqZhM/vmaphynfkksKvceHDsW1xSDfjR1dPsF6x7GNUC0ruh5Y1sqbmlsDbujEfgc6w+CaQ1Pa0e7M/g0Ya8SigcKb4CQTALswYowYriOJRnOMiATMxqUMXS5fD8hXq4Q3ZsTGPKCS7M4n24Lw0g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=c8Kc5bD2uBZGpbt8RuhHHzkHROe2x5FZWb04P7q0o+I=; b=QhuUWoAxkiLQ63oIXGmk+dsowzv3l48dy5d2fXkPohQr9RNv+izf5bk+oi9k0qZSnBTCPB1w+U1zAnLMe0JDKq/Lv1Stk7CVY396DN51GTiLkJUt/yDMuoCqrqRndPCRd1e5nb0gHshzYjOjlfdpY3G55IG2dwFHO6iCaBorecgpOw2+4qPGjC85c+IDwgGvqtM/nVHz2m2JqVUJKIYBf1CQqsnneiySPZmmGwOj8h8Ui5lc8pBecdDrpudGrEtKakzFsQvifdo7rXvgLXWjIL7ee0Ekyv4g//iAsYG6cv/isX4xWUtHCIdlWPSvl1XMBGZQ/luC5ljeE5iog/vaSQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=netapp.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=netapp.com; dkim=pass header.d=netapp.com; arc=none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=netapp.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-netapp-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=c8Kc5bD2uBZGpbt8RuhHHzkHROe2x5FZWb04P7q0o+I=; b=fEq3p8blpNbvYMuh1nklEoabp3Al0bbjDuX0WtpAHZAo6hBeK7V5Jj9YsWHzqgNJMBUSLydlXkEsVwWX3S3uEqvffEQFaAJDimIR+dhYvRiqo2+JbAboeAZ6wNjsq8guZg4otEN4nyUx5ePhBqmCKOGQCpRalg2mbfaHm3CJVOQ= Received: from SN4PR0601MB3728.namprd06.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:803:51::24) by SN4PR0601MB3631.namprd06.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:803:4f::21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3305.26; Sun, 23 Aug 2020 19:56:45 +0000 Received: from SN4PR0601MB3728.namprd06.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::b155:6e3d:2116:e638]) by SN4PR0601MB3728.namprd06.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::b155:6e3d:2116:e638%2]) with mapi id 15.20.3305.025; Sun, 23 Aug 2020 19:56:45 +0000 From: "Scheffenegger, Richard" To: Liang Tian , FreeBSD Transport CC: freebsd-net Subject: RE: Fast recovery ssthresh value Thread-Topic: Fast recovery ssthresh value Thread-Index: AQHWeNGXKLXrd0Ypk0G/FpBfyhwhfqlGGMBA Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2020 19:56:45 +0000 Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: de-AT, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [185.236.167.136] x-ms-publictraffictype: Email x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 8f609e53-bc6c-40db-e293-08d8479eaa1c x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: SN4PR0601MB3631: x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:9508; x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1 x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: lcDNmnc7efzQ5yXoJUiPjnitFXMzLkQlxsHHKvAv1aH0h631M+4VRgKqnp0MQm5v+FDuHVYq3lWg5T41cm/JhrA5KJlK+W7ewp/XKePeO4p4NsE1MHljUstAPLarixVIqgfhDsmiIGQnCd9q85Bi4L6o3JG7Am1kuUH4jqdtRpfzxeDYmPKhTxMvrS305YGx6aoz8csPmW9Rrq2B6pmBnThzF4cevOBWniDmh++jZdgIOyLHi0sniJLHHonoq3lZoC3bloveSu06IZp91uznxmQgLs93oq6NjdPliTgpBPA9EhTRD3J91KIHi5UV14QR/PSG/oYk+zsZV4eBd7jaxoIT9YTqhYidu8uV7BLK3ogZvm6NMIuDDC0vPDwp5ECiR1zu09B8hjGY6A9i7ikTDA== x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:SN4PR0601MB3728.namprd06.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFS:(4636009)(396003)(346002)(376002)(136003)(366004)(39860400002)(966005)(52536014)(8676002)(55016002)(316002)(6506007)(53546011)(3480700007)(5660300002)(86362001)(110136005)(2906002)(33656002)(7696005)(8936002)(66446008)(66946007)(83380400001)(66476007)(76116006)(9686003)(71200400001)(186003)(26005)(4326008)(478600001)(66556008)(64756008); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: fhVSBkTiKiY6t4lhiVjYELiSrMl7iyXTXp2WPiJIFW1zH/VCaIs88awb+6UOkM6RCsgl2rEXrl7C0J7TvnYNVN8yHXE9tstuOTgkoFxmr14mOrO7XmyU1m/2XmxsEd//v30DMRwvc1lzbGlb9PpbtSOnoLOoHz5VsSIIrKnabMdQiE29mRp/mASGa21fstU5U2IMT8+2bT4eZAwx0tR+j1dizqCVPgpiX4ZsPatDOW9g0tFGeaEeBZ+UKa3PfjJfsmEDm9YTH9hPJbjTHqU0YsIF8glWgjIqK3c3MTCg4cztwGOImsExOjW2EWokKTkibjByMLNZLehOOg4fxeukjH6OGssmfybEUoBSfdGwZPq5K+uRSYHdc+1mbjOKr644cP6b9HTc4jTT/vRIE8U9p76GqtaS+jDsjS1YMDcvNB4v3QAxpFuWj9le8lRKOZdzNJZan4j5lbnKvvDvReF0eX7OuzBsL6aKPJcATLis3B7lsGch7KRJO3Cdx7STS+pY1yK/T0W/qMoLQSkTy+Mha1xVPRoRi8EGyLbDEgughIdSTaLRnBL/ce4i1tRVa6XlnQngj/ehIKntGDHY4Gi55YByTUmEkloNwftbXrY8fmmW94M0oY1Iz/8RKN9CsQuJAENICOmnrfkQgmRxAI34RA== x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: netapp.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: SN4PR0601MB3728.namprd06.prod.outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 8f609e53-bc6c-40db-e293-08d8479eaa1c X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 23 Aug 2020 19:56:45.6656 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 4b0911a0-929b-4715-944b-c03745165b3a X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: eZfMcLncmSGbLuMHhcoa7aWRujxF+98Qa3M4v8NwFFOaWGc6MUwWS4iyQ9GvU9OKfI2/tfjguSdNTKYPE8Kz3A== X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: SN4PR0601MB3631 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BZQxy2RNwz4LYl X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=netapp.onmicrosoft.com header.s=selector1-netapp-onmicrosoft-com header.b=fEq3p8bl; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of Richard.Scheffenegger@netapp.com designates 2a01:111:f400:fe59::618 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=Richard.Scheffenegger@netapp.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.21 / 15.00]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[netapp.onmicrosoft.com:s=selector1-netapp-onmicrosoft-com]; HAS_XOIP(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a01:111:f400::/48]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[netapp.com]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[netapp.onmicrosoft.com:+]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.71)[-0.706]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[gmail.com,freebsd.org]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:8075, ipnet:2a01:111:f000::/36, country:US]; ARC_ALLOW(-1.00)[microsoft.com:s=arcselector9901:i=1]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-transport,freebsd-net] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2020 19:56:59 -0000 Hi Liang, In SACK loss recovery, you can recover up to ssthresh (prior cwnd/2 [or 70%= in case of cubic]) lost bytes - at least in theory. In comparison, (New)Reno can only recover one lost packet per window, and t= hen keeps on transmitting new segments (ack + cwnd), even before the receip= t of the retransmitted packet is acked. For historic reasons, the semantic of the variable cwnd is overloaded durin= g loss recovery, and it doesn't "really" indicate cwnd, but rather indicate= s if/when retransmissions can happen. In both cases (also the simple one, with only one packet loss), cwnd should= be equal (or near equal) to ssthresh by the time loss recovery is finished= - but NOT before! While it may appear like slow-start, the value of the cw= nd variable really increases by acked_bytes only per ACK (not acked_bytes += SMSS), since the left edge (snd_una) doesn't move right - unlike during sl= ow-start. But numerically, these different phases (slow-start / sack loss-r= ecovery) may appear very similar. You could check this using the (loadable) SIFTR module, which captures t_fl= ags (indicating if cong/loss recovery is active), ssthresh, cwnd, and other= parameters. That is at least how things are supposed to work; or have you investigated = the timing and behavior of SACK loss recovery and found a deviation to RFC3= 517? Note that FBSD currently has not fully implemented RFC6675 support (wh= ich deviates slightly from 3517 under specific circumstances; I have a patc= h pending to implemente 6675 rescue retransmissions, but haven't tweaked th= e other aspects of 6675 vs. 3517. BTW: While freebsd-net is not the wrong DL per se, TCP, UDP, SCTP specific = questions can also be posted to freebsd-transport, which is more narrowly f= ocused. Best regards, Richard Scheffenegger -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org On Beha= lf Of Liang Tian Sent: Sonntag, 23. August 2020 00:14 To: freebsd-net Subject: Fast recovery ssthresh value NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links or o= pen attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is saf= e. Hi all, When 3 dupacks are received and TCP enter fast recovery, if SACK is used, t= he CWND is set to maxseg: 2593 if (tp->t_flags & TF_SACK_PERMIT) { 2594 TCPSTAT_INC( 2595 tcps_sack_recovery_episode); 2596 tp->snd_recover =3D tp->snd_nxt; 2597 tp->snd_cwnd =3D maxseg; 2598 (void) tp->t_fb->tfb_tcp_output(tp); 2599 goto drop; 2600 } Otherwise(SACK is not in use), CWND is set to maxseg before tcp_output() and then set back to snd_ssthresh+inflation 2601 tp->snd_nxt =3D th->th_ack; 2602 tp->snd_cwnd =3D maxseg; 2603 (void) tp->t_fb->tfb_tcp_output(tp); 2604 KASSERT(tp->snd_limited <=3D 2, 2605 ("%s: tp->snd_limited too big", 2606 __func__)); 2607 tp->snd_cwnd =3D tp->snd_ssthresh + 2608 maxseg * 2609 (tp->t_dupacks - tp->snd_limited); 2610 if (SEQ_GT(onxt, tp->snd_nxt)) 2611 tp->snd_nxt =3D onxt; 2612 goto drop; I'm wondering in the SACK case, should CWND be set back to ssthresh(which h= as been slashed in cc_cong_signal() a few lines above) before line 2599, li= ke non-SACK case, instead of doing slow start from maxseg? I read rfc6675 and a few others, and it looks like that's the case. I appre= ciate your opinion, again. Thanks, Liang _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sun Aug 23 21:00:15 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BE253CA27D for ; Sun, 23 Aug 2020 21:00:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BZSM31LMGz4TvT for ; Sun, 23 Aug 2020 21:00:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 161E73CA509; Sun, 23 Aug 2020 21:00:15 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02F783CA508 for ; Sun, 23 Aug 2020 21:00:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BZSM25LBLz4Txr for ; Sun, 23 Aug 2020 21:00:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C802D57A for ; Sun, 23 Aug 2020 21:00:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 07NL0Euo032350 for ; Sun, 23 Aug 2020 21:00:14 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from bugzilla@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 07NL0E76032349 for net@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 23 Aug 2020 21:00:14 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <202008232100.07NL0E76032349@kenobi.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: bugzilla set sender to bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: Problem reports for net@FreeBSD.org that need special attention Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2020 21:00:14 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.33 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2020 21:00:15 -0000 To view an individual PR, use: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=(Bug Id). The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users, which need special attention. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and obsolete releases. Status | Bug Id | Description ------------+-----------+--------------------------------------------------- In Progress | 221146 | [ixgbe] Problem with second laggport In Progress | 235700 | oce(4) driver causes fatal trap 12 on boot with e New | 204438 | setsockopt() handling of kern.ipc.maxsockbuf limi New | 213410 | [carp] service netif restart causes hang only whe Open | 7556 | ppp: sl_compress_init() will fail if called anyth Open | 166724 | if_re(4): watchdog timeout Open | 187835 | ngctl(8) strange behavior when adding more than 5 Open | 193452 | Dell PowerEdge 210 II -- Kernel panic bce (broadc Open | 194453 | dummynet(4): pipe config bw parameter limited to Open | 200319 | Bridge+CARP crashes/freezes Open | 202510 | [CARP] advertisements sourced from CARP IP cause Open | 207261 | netmap: Doesn't do TX sync with kqueue Open | 217978 | dhclient: Support supersede statement for option Open | 222273 | igb(4): Kernel panic (fatal trap 12) due to netwo Open | 225438 | panic in6_unlink_ifa() due to race Open | 227720 | Kernel panic in ppp server Open | 230807 | if_alc(4): Driver not working for Killer Networki Open | 235524 | igb(4): Ethernet interface loses active link stat Open | 236888 | ppp daemon: Allow MTU to be overridden for PPPoE Open | 236983 | bnxt(4) VLAN not operational unless explicit "ifc Open | 237072 | netgraph(4): performance issue [on HardenedBSD]? Open | 237840 | Removed dummynet dependency on ipfw Open | 238324 | Add XG-C100C/AQtion AQC107 10GbE NIC driver Open | 240530 | netgraph/ng_source: Allow ng_source to inject int Open | 240944 | em(4): Crash with Intel 82571EB NIC with AMD Pile Open | 240969 | netinet6: Neighbour reachability detection broken Open | 241106 | tun/ppp: panic: vm_fault: fault on nofault entry Open | 241162 | Panic in closefp() triggered by nginx (uwsgi with Open | 243463 | ix0: Watchdog timeout Open | 244066 | divert: Add sysctls for divert socket send and re Open | 244706 | panic: NULL dereference inside __mtx_lock_sleep() Open | 248306 | if_mvneta: Corrupts TX packets when TXCSUM is not Open | 118111 | rc: network.subr Add MAC address based interface 33 problems total for which you should take action. From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Mon Aug 24 10:30:08 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 448A83B8D7E for ; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 10:30:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BZpKX1BkQz4Xxs for ; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 10:30:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 27C553B9514; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 10:30:08 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 278D43B920E for ; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 10:30:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BZpKX0JLWz4XhD for ; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 10:30:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E2DE517132 for ; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 10:30:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 07OAU7t6020499 for ; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 10:30:07 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 07OAU7kp020498 for net@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 10:30:07 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 248869] e1000: unsolicited promisc mode during init Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2020 10:30:07 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.1-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: IntelNetworking, regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: linimon@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: keywords assigned_to Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2020 10:30:08 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D248869 Mark Linimon changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |IntelNetworking, regression Assignee|bugs@FreeBSD.org |net@FreeBSD.org --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Mon Aug 24 11:38:34 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32EA13BB2AB for ; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 11:38:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BZqrV0fqJz4c5L for ; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 11:38:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 168DF3BB2A6; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 11:38:34 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 165433BAC65 for ; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 11:38:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BZqrT6v8jz4cQ5 for ; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 11:38:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D05AC17ED6 for ; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 11:38:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 07OBcXsu093488 for ; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 11:38:33 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 07OBcXOV093487 for net@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 11:38:33 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 248869] e1000: unsolicited promisc mode during init (post iflib) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2020 11:38:32 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: IntelNetworking, regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: koobs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback? mfc-stable12? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status bug_severity short_desc flagtypes.name version cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2020 11:38:34 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D248869 Kubilay Kocak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|New |Open Severity|Affects Only Me |Affects Some People Summary|e1000: unsolicited promisc |e1000: unsolicited promisc |mode during init |mode during init (post | |iflib) Flags| |maintainer-feedback?(freebs | |d@intel.com), | |maintainer-feedback?(erj@fr | |eebsd.org), mfc-stable12? Version|12.1-RELEASE |12.0-RELEASE CC| |erj@freebsd.org, | |freebsd@intel.com --- Comment #1 from Kubilay Kocak --- Thanks for the report and patch Franco --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Mon Aug 24 12:40:16 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB5793BDD31 for ; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 12:40:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounce@track-my-url.com) Received: from srv-52.mkzp.com (srv-52.mkzp.com [37.1.145.52]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BZsCh1dTxz4j0l for ; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 12:40:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounce@track-my-url.com) To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: =?UTF-8?B?Q09WSUQgMTkndW4gU2VrdMO2cmxlcmUgdmUgTWFsaSBUYWJsb2xhcmEgRXRraXNp?= Message-ID: Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2020 12:16:04 +0000 From: "=?UTF-8?B?VMO8cmtpeWUgU2VybWF5ZSBQaXlhc2FsYXLEsSBCaXJsacSfaQ==?=" Reply-To: info@tspb.org.tr MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer-LID: 469 X-Mailer-RecptId: 2389711 X-Mailer-SID: 5490 X-Mailer-Sent-By: 15 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BZsCh1dTxz4j0l X-Spamd-Bar: +++++++++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=fail reason="No valid SPF, No valid DKIM" header.from=tspb.org.tr (policy=none); spf=softfail (mx1.freebsd.org: 37.1.145.52 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of bounce@track-my-url.com) smtp.mailfrom=bounce@track-my-url.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [9.37 / 15.00]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[info@tspb.org.tr]; REPLYTO_ADDR_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; R_SPF_SOFTFAIL(0.00)[~all:c]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[info@tspb.org.tr,bounce@track-my-url.com]; RCVD_COUNT_ZERO(0.00)[0]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; R_MIXED_CHARSET(1.96)[subject]; PHISHING(0.61)[tspb.org.tr->n-mailer-email-marketing.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:50941, ipnet:37.1.145.0/24, country:TR]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[info@tspb.org.tr,bounce@track-my-url.com]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.91)[0.914]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; HAS_PHPMAILER_SIG(0.00)[]; HAS_LIST_UNSUB(-0.01)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; MANY_INVISIBLE_PARTS(0.10)[2]; HAS_INTERSPIRE_SIG(1.00)[]; VIOLATED_DIRECT_SPF(3.50)[]; AUTOGEN_PHP_SPAMMY(1.00)[]; GREYLIST(0.00)[pass,body]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-net]; DMARC_POLICY_SOFTFAIL(0.10)[tspb.org.tr : No valid SPF, No valid DKIM,none] X-Spam: Yes Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.33 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2020 12:40:16 -0000 TSPB Birlikte Eğitim Mesleki Gelişim Eğitimleri Bülteni Daha İyi Görüntülemek İçin Tıklayın [http://track-2.n-mailer-email-marketing.com/0100D2389711|01109c00fdf926bb981d59ee664f79715a6a|11005490|1110469|00012514.html]TSPB Birlikte Eğitim Mesleki Gelişim Eğitimleri "COVID 19'un Sektörlere ve Mali Tablolara Etkisi" Online Eğitim"Zoom"uygulaması üzerinden gerçekleştirilecektir. Eğitimin 25 kişilik kontenjanı bulunmaktadır. Başvurularını gerçekleştirilen katılımcılara online eğitime giriş için gerekli bilgiler iletilecektir. Başvuru için: www.tspb.org.tr [http://track-2.n-mailer-email-marketing.com/1110L2389711|10015490|010122069|0001T.html] Üyelik ve başvurularınızla ilgili sorularınız için: info@birlikteeğitim.org [mailto:info@birlikteeğitim.org] ve ya aşağıdaki telefon numarasından bize ulaşabilirsiniz. Eğitmen: Prof. Dr. Barış Sipahi-Marmara Üniversitesi-İşletme Fakültesi Eğitim Tarihi: 21 Eylül 2020 Eğitim Süresi: ½ Gün Ders Saati: 13:30-17:30 Eğitim Ücreti: 200 TL (KDV dahil, kişi başı) Eğitim Yeri: Online Eğitim-Zoom Başvuru: www.tspb.org.tr [http://track-2.n-mailer-email-marketing.com/0100L2389711|01115490|011022069|1001T.html] TSPB Birlikte Eğitim Büyükdere Caddesi No: 173 1.Levent Plaza A Blok Kat4 Şişli-İstanbul Telefon: 0212 280 85 67 info@birlikteegitim.org [mailto:info@birlikteegitim.org] www.tspb.org.tr [http://track-2.n-mailer-email-marketing.com/1101L2389711|01005490|10105892|1100T.html] Pandemi sürecinin sektörlere yansıması nedir? Hangi sektör olumlu etkilendi? Hangi sektör olumsuz etkilendi? Sektörel değişim ve beklentileri nasıl yorumlamalıyım? Merak ettiğiniz soruların cevabını eğitimimizde bulacaksınız. 21 Eylül 2020 tarihinde "COVID 19'un Sektörlere ve Mali Tablolara Etkisi" online eğitimimize bekliyoruz. EĞİTİM KONULARI Dayanıklı Tüketim Malları Sektörü Mevcut Durumu ve COVID'in Mevcut Duruma Etkileri Tekstil ve Konfeksiyon Sektörü Mevcut Durumu ve COVID'in Mevcut Duruma Etkileri Otomotiv Sektörü Mevcut Durumu ve COVID'in Mevcut Duruma Etkileri İnşaat Sektörü Mevcut Durumu ve COVID'in Mevcut Duruma Etkileri Turizm Sektörü Mevcut Durumu ve COVID'in Mevcut Duruma Etkileri Gıda Sektörü Mevcut Durumu ve COVID'in Mevcut Duruma Etkileri Perakende Sektörü Mevcut Durumu ve COVID'in Mevcut Duruma Etkileri Tarım Sektörü Mevcut Durumu ve COVID'in Mevcut Duruma Etkileri Ulaşım Sektörü Mevcut Durumu ve COVID'in Mevcut Duruma Etkileri Endeksler Sanayi Üretim Endeksi Sektörel Güven Endeksi Reel Kesim Güven Endeksi İmalat Sanayi Kapasite Kullanım Oranları Bu e-posta tarafınıza TSPB tarafından oluşturulan üye veritabanına kayıtlı olduğunuz için gönderilmiştir.Beni bu listeden çıkar [http://track-2.n-mailer-email-marketing.com/0100U2389711|11109c00fdf926bb981d59ee664f79715a6a|0100469|10105490.html] From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Mon Aug 24 14:47:25 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E74C23C2F74 for ; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 14:47:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from prvs=650518724b=mark.saad@lucera.com) Received: from mx0a-0017d602.pphosted.com (mx0a-0017d602.pphosted.com [148.163.149.125]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.pphosted.com", Issuer "Thawte RSA CA 2018" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BZw2N71Hcz4vdj for ; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 14:47:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from prvs=650518724b=mark.saad@lucera.com) Received: from pps.filterd (m0101311.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-0017d602.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 07OEhTrF025827 for ; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 10:47:23 -0400 Received: from nam04-co1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-co1nam04lp2055.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.45.55]) by mx0b-0017d602.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 332vuf437s-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 10:47:22 -0400 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=arLtpv8ybIyYgrOSmAMpIU4qYX4FucVve4+uM4bdULJQ7ejBAY9xa28kGxbWUxfN1se0dVc8IBRVnjl3zgyX2sjzsB9kTirAjoLKaUFo467v7Q0czLBTCNtMbwzhQHWU1z4cOoSAEfZzpcXEyO3OljukfbIqeWQ3k6hu615Hv06lLUcYZUyEzWqxm/Fuh8TuV0NTcZPm+LYIomKY0qMAoPqIU2FRFcgIF0+SGE7b1LgII7zyoSiEC6KJRXb4yaquYpLMuOi78/Ab2nhPjWsHcJJRaCzZGi4ZwvyrxfdLRfj9eFdtZT78bYTvrhX4YLEcZK8dmXOeKDxR29dqKekEBA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=KvbwligtFndfpHTX43GuIOkROiZr/bPqtizE2HjOsOA=; b=JlQyOUXiEQ61cJnUJhpRmLmFoDO/TbEvmfD6KOoibXhKV7AoBCgi0F7QLGLHm7RUiIFHomlM0Wp3InsPkUQrRmz9kH1xv5kz4tXEQ9V9Mmw7jDzfvotsYWl1E3Oajd7+I7MU1glUZ3/iy7Rb+nQLOZXND0PkYVaGtzSRbX7YR36MdWxafDPMpyl2PrpIkLUfAIBVonoyFLwaccyc4gfST32mi5QQq/1O/8i0p2MBHIHdRRYGWsaxLZR0aJYeg0UzIIkpsROsQUQvPNcwbTTXr9VBuFCC763XoLK7NKque5l+I3DP5uybxa2USg9zaRWXaNgD8TdXoFw3e4SiHEww6w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lucera.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=lucera.com; dkim=pass header.d=lucera.com; arc=none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bgccs.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-bgccs-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=KvbwligtFndfpHTX43GuIOkROiZr/bPqtizE2HjOsOA=; b=mzsqnd5P1h8BXd0uVrMeV312YePBR+qK2bdb76IRyYKNWAJ85b27JxuUZ8geYoAafvtp+t1ySdHN9wlRu42jYdjbuaQmmruw2rzASBJ0slHGuhlD+fnzgfbA8aRG8M81NMdatl0c+VcUb4xsXGBpaNSh66TwO1lmWN1lK6HoFvU= Received: from CY4PR12MB1704.namprd12.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:903:11d::22) by CY4PR12MB1560.namprd12.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:910:d::22) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3305.26; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 14:47:19 +0000 Received: from CY4PR12MB1704.namprd12.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::11e1:d6a5:62cc:3e2d]) by CY4PR12MB1704.namprd12.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::11e1:d6a5:62cc:3e2d%6]) with mapi id 15.20.3305.026; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 14:47:19 +0000 From: "Saad, Mark" To: "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" Subject: Question about net.inet.tcp.minmss Thread-Topic: Question about net.inet.tcp.minmss Thread-Index: AQHWeOk1Q3e+66v/MUeiMEQTSJLfbw== Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2020 14:47:19 +0000 Message-ID: <9818615F-7FEF-47CD-B589-2F97E85E0E70@lucera.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [148.76.37.33] x-ms-publictraffictype: Email x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 27f4d41f-5a3e-4f7c-4bca-08d8483c9a45 x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: CY4PR12MB1560: x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:2449; x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1 x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 5K6Z/MYCcq3RJ7C3rSTm6ZdPKVmz6BEdXtnwxsn204Bq1HCzqBurj0KxlrmYAXxCiwaZ2KZa5c31B6CYxyKMNZrI/f3sSET7Y4DxFSk4QteU5IIoFN+WpPn7pa2Hk1OMOu51GpB94ZvGhs2EsLkz1wLtGuKXCVCX+UBk5nd+42KDqin9aS3PLYy64GI9MPvvKKnz+OFNEMkIZKRr6upACB6tgZOojQrjlA4aq+NDYliiMBetiit0RvK0pFc+WLzO8ENGyu45O9mo52Fovhq7jbmtiHI1gQ1NMxbTIgQtbnfCUpwB5ApEEDGTS4/4wHP25gCkfc1nNtt4tpR/EzjdsA== x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:CY4PR12MB1704.namprd12.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFS:(4636009)(136003)(366004)(376002)(39860400002)(346002)(396003)(6486002)(33656002)(558084003)(316002)(186003)(36756003)(26005)(2906002)(6506007)(5660300002)(66476007)(64756008)(66446008)(478600001)(91956017)(6916009)(76116006)(19627405001)(71200400001)(6512007)(8936002)(8676002)(66946007)(86362001)(66556008)(2616005); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: 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 x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: lucera.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: CY4PR12MB1704.namprd12.prod.outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 27f4d41f-5a3e-4f7c-4bca-08d8483c9a45 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 24 Aug 2020 14:47:19.3916 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: cfeb5f5e-839a-44b8-ab46-47157d8f1241 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: LbGb7Z+rCWP7PDpNy4oTXP1LrH9kVHZRzXl5SUc0eD4tJiePHaaOJkjmn5jn+bTPW41LM17K3S6t3XFzkvFUSA== X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: CY4PR12MB1560 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.235, 18.0.687 definitions=2020-08-24_12:2020-08-24, 2020-08-24 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 clxscore=1031 adultscore=0 mlxscore=0 malwarescore=0 spamscore=0 impostorscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 priorityscore=1501 suspectscore=0 bulkscore=0 mlxlogscore=419 phishscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2006250000 definitions=main-2008240118 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BZw2N71Hcz4vdj X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=bgccs.onmicrosoft.com header.s=selector1-bgccs-onmicrosoft-com header.b=mzsqnd5P; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of prvs=650518724b=mark.saad@lucera.com designates 148.163.149.125 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=prvs=650518724b=mark.saad@lucera.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.40 / 15.00]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; HAS_XOIP(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[bgccs.onmicrosoft.com:s=selector1-bgccs-onmicrosoft-com]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-net@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[lucera.com]; ARC_ALLOW(-1.00)[microsoft.com:s=arcselector9901:i=1]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; FORGED_SENDER_VERP_SRS(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:148.163.149.125]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[bgccs.onmicrosoft.com:+]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.80)[-0.804]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[148.163.149.125:from]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:26211, ipnet:148.163.148.0/22, country:US]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[Mark.Saad@lucera.com,prvs=650518724b=mark.saad@lucera.com]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-net]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[148.163.149.125:from] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.33 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2020 14:47:26 -0000 All I was wondering if anyone has a good explication on what net.inet.tcp.min= mss's interaction with routing. I can't find any good details. Anyone have any good pointers. --- Mark Saad | mark.saad@lucera.com From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Mon Aug 24 20:58:12 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FA763CD55A; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 20:58:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jmg@gold.funkthat.com) Received: from gold.funkthat.com (gate2.funkthat.com [208.87.223.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "gate2.funkthat.com", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Bb4GB3gRHz4Gmm; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 20:58:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jmg@gold.funkthat.com) Received: from gold.funkthat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gold.funkthat.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 07OKw8vc084323 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 24 Aug 2020 13:58:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jmg@gold.funkthat.com) Received: (from jmg@localhost) by gold.funkthat.com (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 07OKw8n9084322; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 13:58:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jmg) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2020 13:58:08 -0700 From: John-Mark Gurney To: Ganbold Tsagaankhuu Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CFT: major update to if_ure Message-ID: <20200824205808.GI4213@funkthat.com> Mail-Followup-To: Ganbold Tsagaankhuu , freebsd-net@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org References: <20200725231318.GO4213@funkthat.com> <20200726211447.GQ4213@funkthat.com> <20200727183503.GW4213@funkthat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 11.3-STABLE amd64 X-PGP-Fingerprint: D87A 235F FB71 1F3F 55B7 ED9B D5FF 5A51 C0AC 3D65 X-Files: The truth is out there X-URL: https://www.funkthat.com/ X-Resume: https://www.funkthat.com/~jmg/resume.html X-TipJar: bitcoin:13Qmb6AeTgQecazTWph4XasEsP7nGRbAPE X-to-the-FBI-CIA-and-NSA: HI! HOW YA DOIN? can i haz chizburger? User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27) X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (gold.funkthat.com [127.0.0.1]); Mon, 24 Aug 2020 13:58:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Bb4GB3gRHz4Gmm X-Spamd-Bar: ++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of jmg@gold.funkthat.com has no SPF policy when checking 208.87.223.18) smtp.mailfrom=jmg@gold.funkthat.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [2.42 / 15.00]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FREEFALL_USER(0.00)[jmg]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[funkthat.com]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.87)[0.871]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.35)[0.351]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[gmail.com]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[jmg@funkthat.com,jmg@gold.funkthat.com]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:32354, ipnet:208.87.216.0/21, country:US]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[jmg@funkthat.com,jmg@gold.funkthat.com]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-net,freebsd-current]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2020 20:58:12 -0000 Ganbold Tsagaankhuu wrote this message on Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 16:27 +0800: > On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 2:35 AM John-Mark Gurney wrote: > > > Ganbold Tsagaankhuu wrote this message on Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 18:29 +0800: > > > On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 5:14 AM John-Mark Gurney > > wrote: > > > > > > > Ganbold Tsagaankhuu wrote this message on Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 11:05 > > +0800: > > > > > On Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 7:13 AM John-Mark Gurney > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > > > > > I'd like people who have ure (RealTek) based USB devices to test > > > > > > review D25809[0]. > > > > > > > > > > > > This update adds support for: > > > > > > - HW VLAN tagging > > > > > > - HW checksum offload for IPv4 and IPv6 > > > > > > - tx and rx aggreegation (for full gige speeds) > > > > > > - multiple transactions > > > > > > > > > > > > In my testing, I am able to get 900-950Mbps depending upon > > > > > > TCP or UDP, which is a significant improvement over the previous > > > > > > 91Mbps (~8kint/sec*1500bytes/packet*1packet/int). > > > > > > > > > > Does performance improve for if_ure device on USB2? > > > > > I will try to test it in a couple of days on NanoPI R1 and R1S > > boards. > > > > > > > > Yes, it should. > > > > > > > > I never tested the before driver on USB2, but I'm now able to get > > > > 211Mbps TX and 190Mbps RX TCP, and 227Mbps TX and 225Mbps RX UDP. > > > > > > > > I believe it is likely that the same 91Mbps speed limit applied to > > > > USB2 as well. > > > > > > Couldn't find your iperf test scripts and I tested only tcp: > > > > My test script isn't performance, just features, and I'm thinking about > > how/where to publish it... > > > > You can also test UDP using -u w/ iperf3 and adjust the bandwidth w/ > > -b 300m (or other Mbps)... > > > > > root@nanopi-r1s-h5:~ # iperf3 -c 192.168.111.1 > > > Connecting to host 192.168.111.1, port 5201 > > > [ 5] local 192.168.111.10 port 28569 connected to 192.168.111.1 port > > 5201 > > > [ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr Cwnd > > > [ 5] 0.00-1.00 sec 27.4 MBytes 230 Mbits/sec 0 95.4 KBytes > > > [ 5] 1.00-2.00 sec 27.6 MBytes 232 Mbits/sec 0 95.4 KBytes > > > [ 5] 2.00-3.00 sec 27.7 MBytes 232 Mbits/sec 0 95.4 KBytes > > > [ 5] 3.00-4.00 sec 27.6 MBytes 232 Mbits/sec 0 95.4 KBytes > > > [ 5] 4.00-5.00 sec 27.6 MBytes 232 Mbits/sec 0 95.4 KBytes > > > [ 5] 5.00-6.00 sec 27.6 MBytes 232 Mbits/sec 0 95.4 KBytes > > > [ 5] 6.00-7.00 sec 27.7 MBytes 232 Mbits/sec 0 95.4 KBytes > > > [ 5] 7.00-8.00 sec 27.7 MBytes 232 Mbits/sec 0 95.4 KBytes > > > [ 5] 8.00-9.00 sec 27.6 MBytes 232 Mbits/sec 0 95.4 KBytes > > > [ 5] 9.00-10.00 sec 27.6 MBytes 232 Mbits/sec 0 95.4 KBytes > > > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - > > > [ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr > > > [ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 276 MBytes 232 Mbits/sec 0 > > sender > > > [ 5] 0.00-10.79 sec 276 MBytes 215 Mbits/sec > > > receiver > > > > > > iperf Done. > > > root@nanopi-r1s-h5:~ # iperf3 -c 192.168.111.1 -R > > > Connecting to host 192.168.111.1, port 5201 > > > Reverse mode, remote host 192.168.111.1 is sending > > > [ 5] local 192.168.111.10 port 29384 connected to 192.168.111.1 port > > 5201 > > > [ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate > > > [ 5] 0.00-1.00 sec 12.1 MBytes 102 Mbits/sec > > > [ 5] 1.00-2.00 sec 12.1 MBytes 102 Mbits/sec > > > [ 5] 2.00-3.00 sec 12.1 MBytes 101 Mbits/sec > > > [ 5] 3.00-4.00 sec 12.1 MBytes 102 Mbits/sec > > > [ 5] 4.00-5.00 sec 12.1 MBytes 102 Mbits/sec > > > [ 5] 5.00-6.00 sec 12.1 MBytes 102 Mbits/sec > > > [ 5] 6.00-7.00 sec 12.1 MBytes 101 Mbits/sec > > > [ 5] 7.00-8.00 sec 12.1 MBytes 102 Mbits/sec > > > [ 5] 8.00-9.00 sec 12.1 MBytes 101 Mbits/sec > > > [ 5] 9.00-10.00 sec 12.1 MBytes 102 Mbits/sec > > > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - > > > [ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr > > > [ 5] 0.00-11.25 sec 121 MBytes 90.3 Mbits/sec 2539 > > > sender > > > [ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 121 MBytes 101 Mbits/sec > > > receiver > > > > > > iperf Done. > > > root@nanopi-r1s-h5:~ # sysctl -a | grep cpu.0.freq > > > dev.cpu.0.freq_levels: 1248/-1 1008/-1 816/-1 624/-1 480/-1 > > > dev.cpu.0.freq: 1248 > > > > Hmmm... The reverse seems slow, but I can't think of why it'd be that > > slow though. When I did my tests on the USB2 ports, both directions > > were about the same speed... > > > > Thanks for the test! Great to hear things are working... > > When can you commit it? Plan on committing it this week... -- John-Mark Gurney Voice: +1 415 225 5579 "All that I will do, has been done, All that I have, has not." From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Aug 25 09:43:53 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81D6B3C5682 for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 09:43:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Michael.Tuexen@lurchi.franken.de) Received: from drew.franken.de (mail-n.franken.de [193.175.24.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.franken.de", Issuer "Sectigo RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BbPFh4HMPz46mt for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 09:43:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Michael.Tuexen@lurchi.franken.de) Received: from [IPv6:2a02:8109:1140:c3d:c896:c1b0:be4f:48b0] (unknown [IPv6:2a02:8109:1140:c3d:c896:c1b0:be4f:48b0]) (Authenticated sender: lurchi) by mail-n.franken.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4F34D7220B80B; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 11:43:49 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.1\)) Subject: Re: Appropriate Byte Counting during Congestion Avoidance From: Michael Tuexen In-Reply-To: <51C01869-3FC2-43A8-AC9D-4A6F961F93B7@lurchi.franken.de> Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2020 11:43:45 +0200 Cc: freebsd-net Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <2854347B-8C13-485A-AA23-B895B6ACD714@lurchi.franken.de> References: <51C01869-3FC2-43A8-AC9D-4A6F961F93B7@lurchi.franken.de> To: Liang Tian X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.1) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=disabled version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on mail-n.franken.de X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BbPFh4HMPz46mt X-Spamd-Bar: + Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of Michael.Tuexen@lurchi.franken.de has no SPF policy when checking 193.175.24.27) smtp.mailfrom=Michael.Tuexen@lurchi.franken.de X-Spamd-Result: default: False [1.32 / 15.00]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.22)[0.216]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[franken.de]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.19)[-0.193]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[gmail.com]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:680, ipnet:193.174.0.0/15, country:DE]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-net]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[193.175.24.27:from] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2020 09:43:53 -0000 > On 19. Aug 2020, at 10:14, Michael Tuexen = wrote: >=20 >> On 19. Aug 2020, at 06:51, Liang Tian wrote: >>=20 >> Hi everyone, >>=20 >> We noticed CWND is growing much slower than expected during = congestion >> avoidance with new reno, and we came to this piece of code in >> cc_ack_received() at tcp_input.c:353 >>=20 >> if (type =3D=3D CC_ACK) { >> .... >> if (tp->snd_cwnd > tp->snd_ssthresh) { >> tp->t_bytes_acked +=3D min(tp->ccv->bytes_this_ack, >> nsegs * V_tcp_abc_l_var * tcp_maxseg(tp)); >> if (tp->t_bytes_acked >=3D tp->snd_cwnd) { >> tp->t_bytes_acked -=3D tp->snd_cwnd; >> tp->ccv->flags |=3D CCF_ABC_SENTAWND; >> } >> The increment of t_bytes_acked is capped at 2*maxseg. >> The description of the sysctl variable tcp_abc_l_var(default value 2) = is >> "Cap the max cwnd increment during slow-start to this number of = segments" >> After reading RFC3465, it doesn't look like this cap should be = applied >> here since this is clearly not during slow-start. >> We've seen in some cases the receiver is ACKing every 16 packets, and >> CWND is growing at 1/8 of the expected rate because of this. >>=20 >> I would appreciate your opinion on this. Thanks a lot. > Hi Liang, >=20 > thanks for bringing this up. I agree. A patch is under review: > https://reviews.freebsd.org/D26120 Now fixed in https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/364754 Thanks again for reporting. Best regards Michael >=20 > Best regards > Michael >>=20 >> Regards, >> Liang >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list >> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >=20 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Aug 25 17:45:29 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E7A33B3527 for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 17:45:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BbbxP2PvDz3Wtg for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 17:45:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 528E73B2F62; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 17:45:29 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 525063B3526 for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 17:45:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BbbxP1bK0z3Wwy for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 17:45:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1B6272D874 for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 17:45:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 07PHjSkV003164 for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 17:45:28 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 07PHjS1U003162 for net@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 17:45:28 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 248306] if_mvneta: Corrupts TX packets when TXCSUM is not used Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2020 17:45:28 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-qa X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: markj@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: mw@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: mfc-stable12? mfc-stable11? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: assigned_to bug_status resolution Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2020 17:45:29 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D248306 Mark Johnston changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|net@FreeBSD.org |mw@FreeBSD.org Status|Open |Closed Resolution|--- |FIXED --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Aug 26 05:46:35 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABB093CA593 for ; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 05:46:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BbvxR45mjz4j1W for ; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 05:46:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 8AD943CA608; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 05:46:35 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A9F43CA592 for ; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 05:46:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BbvxR38Prz4j6m for ; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 05:46:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4ED7FE705 for ; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 05:46:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 07Q5kZBB098817 for ; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 05:46:35 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 07Q5kZFk098816 for net@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 05:46:35 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 248306] if_mvneta: Corrupts TX packets when TXCSUM is not used Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2020 05:46:34 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: koobs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: mw@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: mfc-stable12- mfc-stable11- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: keywords flagtypes.name Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2020 05:46:35 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D248306 Kubilay Kocak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords|needs-qa | Flags|mfc-stable12?, |mfc-stable12-, |mfc-stable11? |mfc-stable11- --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Aug 26 16:41:04 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC9C13B20C2 for ; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 16:41:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BcBSc63Dgz4Gmd for ; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 16:41:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id CF6993B20C0; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 16:41:04 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEFC43B1F57 for ; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 16:41:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BcBSc53S6z4GfL for ; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 16:41:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8FE4816028 for ; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 16:41:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 07QGf4F3059079 for ; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 16:41:04 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 07QGf4cR059078 for net@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 16:41:04 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 236584] em(4): Cannot disable vlanhwtag Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2020 16:41:04 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.2-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: easy, needs-qa X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: erj@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: vmaffione@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback+ mfc-stable12? mfc-stable11? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: flagtypes.name Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2020 16:41:05 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D236584 Eric Joyner changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|maintainer-feedback?(erj@fr |maintainer-feedback+ |eebsd.org) | --- Comment #17 from Eric Joyner --- (In reply to Vincenzo Maffione from comment #14) This should be something that is investigated on ixgbe(4), but I can't do it atm. In reply to the request for feedback, I think this change is good and does = what it's supposed to, looking at the documentation for the VME bit in E1000_CTR= L. Is the port feedback asking if this should be added to the port? --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Aug 26 16:47:25 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B8473B28A8 for ; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 16:47:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BcBbw4xzhz4HZR for ; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 16:47:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 98C3E3B2907; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 16:47:24 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9877D3B27BB for ; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 16:47:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BcBbw0dc8z4HTl for ; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 16:47:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E2AFE16071 for ; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 16:47:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 07QGlNbe067060 for ; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 16:47:23 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 07QGlNXF067059 for net@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 16:47:23 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 248869] e1000: unsolicited promisc mode during init (post iflib) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2020 16:47:23 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: IntelNetworking, regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: erj@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback+ mfc-stable12? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: flagtypes.name Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2020 16:47:25 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D248869 Eric Joyner changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|maintainer-feedback?(freebs |maintainer-feedback+, |d@intel.com), |maintainer-feedback+ |maintainer-feedback?(erj@fr | |eebsd.org) | --- Comment #2 from Eric Joyner --- This looks good to me. This would match the behavior of em_set_promisc() in= =20 em_init() in the non-iflib version of em(4). --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Aug 26 18:02:49 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 186943B6673 for ; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 18:02:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BcDGw70Tkz4QD2 for ; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 18:02:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id F038D3B6977; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 18:02:48 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F00683B6672 for ; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 18:02:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BcDGw69PSz4Q9y for ; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 18:02:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B7561171AF for ; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 18:02:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 07QI2mCo062059 for ; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 18:02:48 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 07QI2mjJ062058 for net@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 18:02:48 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 248869] e1000: unsolicited promisc mode during init (post iflib) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2020 18:02:48 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: IntelNetworking, regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: franco@opnsense.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback+ mfc-stable12? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2020 18:02:49 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D248869 --- Comment #3 from Franco Fichtner --- Thanks! Is there any chance to get this into 12.1-RELEASE as errata as wel= l? As a related issue hw.em.sbp changed defaults at the same time: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D248934 Cheers, Franco --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Aug 26 18:07:30 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2E2C3B6AB2 for ; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 18:07:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BcDNL6DNTz4QYQ for ; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 18:07:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id D5B773B6B48; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 18:07:30 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D58483B6AAC for ; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 18:07:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BcDNL5Mx4z4QT1 for ; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 18:07:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9AEDC16F3A for ; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 18:07:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 07QI7UVj066155 for ; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 18:07:30 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 07QI7UWa066153 for net@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 18:07:30 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 246654] Intel i350 with igb vf driver does not correctly handle the vlan tag Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2020 18:07:30 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.2-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: IntelNetworking X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: tokade@cgnf.net X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2020 18:07:31 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D246654 --- Comment #1 from Torsten --- Hi all, updated my OPNsense which based on FreeBSD 12.1-RELEASE-p8-HBSD. Still same behavior. Any chance to get this fixed? Regards Torsten --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Aug 26 18:16:14 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6367F3B71D2 for ; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 18:16:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from broadband@alafaljeng.com) Received: from rdns0.alafaljeng.com (hwsrv-768550.hostwindsdns.com [192.236.160.162]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BcDZQ0j8zz4R1c for ; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 18:16:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from broadband@alafaljeng.com) From: Administrator Notice To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Employee account can't be renewed Date: 26 Aug 2020 11:16:04 -0700 Message-ID: <20200826111604.706F8298A071C3C9@alafaljeng.com> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BcDZQ0j8zz4R1c X-Spamd-Bar: - X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.07 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.94)[-0.939]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[alafaljeng.com:s=default]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; HFILTER_HOSTNAME_2(1.00)[hwsrv-768550.hostwindsdns.com]; ZERO_FONT(0.20)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.96)[-0.957]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; MANY_INVISIBLE_PARTS(0.20)[3]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[alafaljeng.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[alafaljeng.com,reject]; MIME_HTML_ONLY(0.20)[]; RCVD_COUNT_ZERO(0.00)[0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:~]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.12)[0.124]; ASN(0.00)[asn:54290, ipnet:192.236.160.0/22, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-net] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.33 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2020 18:16:14 -0000 From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Aug 26 19:24:14 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE2C63B9722 for ; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 19:24:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BcG4t6784z4WjM for ; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 19:24:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id D21CB3B966B; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 19:24:14 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1EC13B9720 for ; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 19:24:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BcG4t5CZxz4WjL for ; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 19:24:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9624818098 for ; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 19:24:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 07QJOEaU059153 for ; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 19:24:14 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 07QJOE2W059152 for net@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 19:24:14 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 248934] e1000: hw.em.sbp default value change Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2020 19:24:14 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.1-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: IntelNetworking X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: linimon@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: keywords assigned_to Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2020 19:24:15 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D248934 Mark Linimon changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |IntelNetworking Assignee|bugs@FreeBSD.org |net@FreeBSD.org --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Aug 26 21:09:41 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BA103BCB09 for ; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 21:09:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ghuckriede@blackberry.com) Received: from smtp-pg11.blackberry.com (smtp-pg11.blackberry.com [68.171.242.227]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BcJQW6BYpz4fTQ for ; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 21:09:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ghuckriede@blackberry.com) Received: from pps.filterd (mhs401ykf.rim.net [127.0.0.1]) by mhs401ykf.rim.net (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 07QL50Tc083101 for ; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 17:09:37 -0400 Received: from mhs300ykf.rim.net (mhs300ykf.rim.net [10.2.24.129]) by mhs401ykf.rim.net with ESMTP id 334xhdbqmu-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 17:09:37 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (mhs300ykf.rim.net [127.0.0.1]) by mhs300ykf.rim.net (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 07QL6ep0009187 for ; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 17:09:37 -0400 Received: from [10.242.240.68] ([10.242.240.68]) by mhs300ykf.rim.net with ESMTP id 333k09pdxb-1 for ; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 17:09:36 -0400 To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org From: Greg Huckriede Subject: How do 'miibus' PHY devices handle target HW differences? Message-ID: <44fe4819-9005-2b1b-c9c4-37550370feb8@blackberry.com> Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2020 17:09:31 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.235, 18.0.687 definitions=2020-08-26_14:2020-08-26, 2020-08-26 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 suspectscore=1 spamscore=0 malwarescore=0 mlxscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 phishscore=0 mlxlogscore=484 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2006250000 definitions=main-2008260160 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BcJQW6BYpz4fTQ X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=blackberry.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of ghuckriede@blackberry.com designates 68.171.242.227 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=ghuckriede@blackberry.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.79 / 15.00]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:68.171.242.227]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-net@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.97)[-0.968]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.93)[-0.934]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.98)[-0.984]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[blackberry.com,none]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:18705, ipnet:68.171.224.0/19, country:CA]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-net]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[68.171.242.227:from] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2020 21:09:41 -0000 I'm using the 'ffec' driver (in 12.1-RELEASE) but the target has the following Flattened Device Tree (FDT) setting for the 'ethernet' device. phy-mode = "rgmii-txid"; This indicates that the PHY 'athphy' needs to provide the tx clock delay on the RGMII. This is configurable in the 'atphy' device. The 'atphy' device could get this setting from the FDT (like the 'vscphy' driver does). How is this supposed to work? It seems the FDT could be read during attach for all PHYs, and populate the settings if present. Also how do non-FDT targets deal with HW differences like this? Regards, Greg Huckriede From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu Aug 27 19:18:29 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15DE03BF593 for ; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 19:18:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Bcsvm4RvSz4c8Y for ; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 19:18:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 716AD3BF613; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 19:18:28 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70FE73BF0EA for ; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 19:18:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Bcsvl2YdBz4c4F for ; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 19:18:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C00378F9F for ; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 19:18:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 07RJINUo036481 for ; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 19:18:23 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from bugzilla@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 07RJINTo036480 for net@FreeBSD.org; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 19:18:23 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: bugzilla set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 236584] em(4): Cannot disable vlanhwtag Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2020 19:18:23 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.2-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: easy, needs-qa X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: commit-hook@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: vmaffione@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback+ mfc-stable12? mfc-stable11? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2020 19:18:29 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D236584 --- Comment #18 from commit-hook@FreeBSD.org --- A commit references this bug: Author: vmaffione Date: Thu Aug 27 19:12:40 UTC 2020 New revision: 364878 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/364878 Log: MFC r363995 em(4): honor vlanhwtag offload The FreeBSD em driver fails to properly reset the VME flag in the e1000 CTRL register oneg the following ifconfig command ifconfig em1 -vlanhwtag Tested on the e1000 device emulated by QEMU, and on a real NIC (chip=3D0x10d38086). PR: 236584 Submitted by: murat@sunnyvalley.io Reported by: murat@sunnyvalley.io Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D25286 Changes: _U stable/12/ stable/12/sys/dev/e1000/if_em.c --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu Aug 27 19:18:29 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B76C03BF4C7 for ; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 19:18:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Bcsvn3grzz4c6H for ; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 19:18:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 47F5C3BF596; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 19:18:29 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41F423BF595 for ; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 19:18:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Bcsvm5wK6z4c2T for ; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 19:18:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 93C3B8E38 for ; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 19:18:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 07RJIQ3U036539 for ; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 19:18:26 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from bugzilla@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 07RJIQgf036538 for net@FreeBSD.org; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 19:18:26 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: bugzilla set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 236584] em(4): Cannot disable vlanhwtag Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2020 19:18:25 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.2-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: easy, needs-qa X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: commit-hook@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: vmaffione@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback+ mfc-stable12? mfc-stable11? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2020 19:18:29 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D236584 --- Comment #19 from commit-hook@FreeBSD.org --- A commit references this bug: Author: vmaffione Date: Thu Aug 27 19:15:09 UTC 2020 New revision: 364879 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/364879 Log: MFC r363995 em(4): honor vlanhwtag offload The FreeBSD em driver fails to properly reset the VME flag in the e1000 CTRL register oneg the following ifconfig command ifconfig em1 -vlanhwtag Tested on the e1000 device emulated by QEMU, and on a real NIC (chip=3D0x10d38086). PR: 236584 Submitted by: murat@sunnyvalley.io Reported by: murat@sunnyvalley.io Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D25286 Changes: _U stable/11/ stable/11/sys/dev/e1000/if_em.c --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Aug 28 09:15:01 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2D853D2AE8 for ; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 09:15:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from igarcia@giftcar.cl) Received: from solucionweb.cl (solucionweb.cl [170.239.85.90]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BdDSz67pZz4GNN for ; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 09:14:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from igarcia@giftcar.cl) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=giftcar.cl; s=default; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-Id:Date:Subject:In-Reply-To: References:Reply-To:To:From:Sender:Cc:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=GKMguI0xbDr2ENQIiu7AUCt9/Os7RmeUYpIvL45C6MY=; b=qwhY2DlyWZgzTgWtcf/Qd7YEvW RawkFwZHxAVJrMUDP3rtkz2pveAjViVp8xEakww1BoSlz5l2L/sSoCPX4oAtUsfrqqNRbGMQAwVam eZqqbnj4aPmHyKlwiDF5uhxw1uhlw+DGqWX06QBznS6v10qdutvdlB8UUtBSU3latQhgn5VQHdqnz oxXhjn25uNLp910VUm8gPoq5faCAZgwc78ynqYNi49ehgcZYYqNvHw3jX6CjBsS+rPdkLOR7z8kWQ BPQhRlF/ZyheB3sPN3wyPKMYpr1Ah6KAEDJdwcrX2RAE4tKBbGMf3yOgsLvRa0MfyaYbAnNUhfwGW kTYGoyuQ==; Received: from [14.241.244.49] (port=38092 helo=giftcar.cl) by server.solucionweb.cl with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1kBVPl-0006YH-Kd for freebsd-net@freebsd.org; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 23:51:02 -0400 From: "rajasooriyar lakshman" To: "freebsd net" Reply-To: "rajasooriyar lakshman" References: <1wv53zrb.st1kttg1.asgk1.4zva@giftcar.cl> In-Reply-To: <1wv53zrb.st1kttg1.asgk1.4zva@giftcar.cl> Subject: RE: Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2020 06:54:14 +0300 Message-Id: <439008aqrf70$ssk65xwe$saxu0vpt$@giftcar.cl> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0 Thread-Index: aHNuLjhfOGQ4eXc3QGY3M3J0Iy10eA== Content-Language: en-us X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server.solucionweb.cl X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - giftcar.cl X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: server.solucionweb.cl: authenticated_id: igarcia@giftcar.cl X-Authenticated-Sender: server.solucionweb.cl: igarcia@giftcar.cl X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BdDSz67pZz4GNN X-Spamd-Bar: ++++++++++++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=giftcar.cl header.s=default header.b=qwhY2Dly; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of igarcia@giftcar.cl designates 170.239.85.90 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=igarcia@giftcar.cl X-Spamd-Result: default: False [12.66 / 15.00]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[laks_guyv@yahoo.com]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; GREYLIST(0.00)[pass,body]; R_SPF_ALLOW(0.00)[+ip4:170.239.85.90]; HAS_X_SOURCE(0.00)[]; REPLYTO_DN_EQ_FROM_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[giftcar.cl:+]; MIME_BASE64_TEXT(0.10)[]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[laks_guy@giftcar.cl,igarcia@giftcar.cl]; HAS_X_ANTIABUSE(0.00)[]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[14.241.244.49:received]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; ASN(0.00)[asn:52368, ipnet:170.239.85.0/24, country:CL]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[laks_guy@giftcar.cl,igarcia@giftcar.cl]; HAS_X_AS(0.00)[igarcia@giftcar.cl]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; SUBJECT_ENDS_SPACES(0.50)[]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_XBL(5.00)[14.241.244.49:received]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(0.00)[giftcar.cl:s=default]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; SH_AUTHBL_RECEIVED(4.00)[14.241.244.49:received]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.81)[0.812]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; FREEMAIL_REPLYTO(0.00)[yahoo.com]; REPLYTO_DOM_NEQ_FROM_DOM(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.97)[0.966]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; BAD_REP_POLICIES(0.10)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[giftcar.cl]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.99)[0.985]; HAS_X_GMSV(0.00)[igarcia@giftcar.cl]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-net] X-Spam: Yes Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.33 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2020 09:15:01 -0000 RnJlZWJzZArCoArCoArCoApodHRwOi8vYml0LmRvL2ZIU2JuCsKgCsKgCsKgCsKgCsKgCgrCoApG cm9tOiByYWphc29vcml5YXIgbGFrc2htYW4gW21haWx0bzpsYWtzX2d1eWNAeWFob28uY29tXSAK U2VudDogRnJpZGF5LCBBdWd1c3QgMjgsIDIwMjAgMDY6NTQ6MTQgQU0KVG86IGZyZWVic2QtbmV0 QGZyZWVic2Qub3JnClN1YmplY3Q6IArCoArCoArCoArCoApodHRwczovL3d3dy5nb29nbGUuY29t L3NlYXJjaD9laT0zMXMtU21jc2hnNXJhdzBkcXhLNTN1TVBXYlVQZVU3RGdRNSZnc19sPWYxbXli M3NycG1jeng0cDgKwqAKwqAKwqA= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Aug 28 14:52:18 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E35A03B3D80 for ; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 14:52:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from SRS0=32wW=CG=perdition.city=julien@bebif.be) Received: from orval.bbpf.belspo.be (orval.bbpf.belspo.be [193.191.208.90]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BdMyB1R0nz4gFB for ; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 14:52:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from SRS0=32wW=CG=perdition.city=julien@bebif.be) Received: from x1 (77.109.123.220.adsl.dyn.edpnet.net [77.109.123.220]) by orval.bbpf.belspo.be (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 597EB1D4FC26 for ; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 16:52:11 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2020 16:52:01 +0200 From: Julien Cigar To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: CARP over VLAN over LAGG Message-ID: <20200828145201.ezo6zbatmdmcgvzp@x1> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BdMyB1R0nz4gFB X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of SRS0=32wW=CG=perdition.city=julien@bebif.be designates 193.191.208.90 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=SRS0=32wW=CG=perdition.city=julien@bebif.be X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.01 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.11)[-0.112]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-net@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.54)[-0.544]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.06)[0.061]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[perdition.city]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[julien@perdition.city,SRS0=32wW=CG=perdition.city=julien@bebif.be]; RCVD_NO_TLS_LAST(0.10)[]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[77.109.123.220:received]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:2611, ipnet:193.191.192.0/19, country:BE]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[julien@perdition.city,SRS0=32wW=CG=perdition.city=julien@bebif.be]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-net]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2020 14:52:18 -0000 Hello, I have a "highly available" router/firewall with the following configuration (1). Those are plugged in two 2930F (with VSF) using LACP. It works well, except that I have some weird issues with the CARP demotion counter when I'm unplugging some interfaces involved in the lagg/carp setup, for example if I unplug/replug igb0 and igb1 in this case: (dmesg): igb0: link state changed to DOWN igb1: link state changed to DOWN carp: demoted by 240 to 240 (send error 50 on vlan11) carp: 11@vlan11: MASTER -> BACKUP (more frequent advertisement received) vlan11: deletion failed: 3 igb1: link state changed to UP igb0: link state changed to UP then the CARP status stays to BACKUP unless I demote the CARP demotion counter manually with: sudo sysctl net.inet.carp.demotion=-240: (dmesg): carp: demoted by -240 to 0 (sysctl) carp: 11@vlan11: BACKUP -> MASTER (preempting a slower master) I guess this is because it takes some time for lagg/lacp to converge and thus carp thinks that there is a problematic condition as it experiences problems with sending announcements.. What it the best way to handle this? Thanks, Julien (1) https://gist.github.com/silenius/577606b596ff1d220bbfd9956d05baef -- Julien Cigar Belgian Biodiversity Platform (http://www.biodiversity.be) PGP fingerprint: EEF9 F697 4B68 D275 7B11 6A25 B2BB 3710 A204 23C0 No trees were killed in the creation of this message. However, many electrons were terribly inconvenienced. From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Aug 28 15:04:36 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A12E3B40C9 for ; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 15:04:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BdNDM70tzz3SYy for ; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 15:04:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id F07B93B40C8; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 15:04:35 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F04993B40C7 for ; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 15:04:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BdNDM68c9z3ScB for ; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 15:04:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B7D9E16955 for ; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 15:04:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 07SF4Zob062834 for ; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 15:04:35 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 07SF4ZCS062833 for net@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 15:04:35 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 248958] pptpd + vlan panic Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2020 15:04:35 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: linimon@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: assigned_to Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2020 15:04:36 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D248958 Mark Linimon changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|bugs@FreeBSD.org |net@FreeBSD.org --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Aug 28 15:04:44 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 544623B404A for ; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 15:04:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BdNDW6fqhz3SRG for ; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 15:04:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id E1B773B4397; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 15:04:43 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E17383B4293 for ; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 15:04:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BdNDW5mKDz3Sfq for ; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 15:04:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A979816C1A for ; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 15:04:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 07SF4hkC062928 for ; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 15:04:43 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 07SF4h5M062927 for net@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 15:04:43 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 248958] pptpd + vlan panic Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2020 15:04:43 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: panic X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: linimon@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: keywords Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2020 15:04:44 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D248958 Mark Linimon changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |panic --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Aug 28 19:56:58 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A37A13BE4EA for ; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 19:56:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ozkan.kirik@gmail.com) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BdVjk30bZz4HhD for ; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 19:56:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ozkan.kirik@gmail.com) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 66D653BE933; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 19:56:58 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 667F03BE9D8 for ; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 19:56:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ozkan.kirik@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vk1-xa2c.google.com (mail-vk1-xa2c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::a2c]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BdVjh4p1mz4Hm7 for ; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 19:56:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ozkan.kirik@gmail.com) Received: by mail-vk1-xa2c.google.com with SMTP id h23so39802vkn.4 for ; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 12:56:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=Vi0HBzKPf62I6/PIQj3fVLk9Cm1m4ejYrVcQsFzwrDo=; b=R4btbfMbOocdN3VRvAGhoHZclbd7D6CHd0HceewJmm+IevIV6NC8Gt/V+JS+xTgXH5 cbNulWy+oKSBfMZL725Gm3NbtLeVg+M7bZo143ButxCJtllI31IxbZopS9jiPswn3Ewk iFkMmULNATY38FJFs1G/oPZsfDDAiK9nbY1uT606H3QKlCbD5DezFxv0DTV8wJLSD9Nt 3SreERIJp6TwUkw5tPyGMmuWugSQO1+DzjpOIwum30MU0TgtbyuDxPNf6kMgYh/TODV0 DoRcbc2YS2tdmMhLQzN7xMMC3gTR/bbwufqnjQFERNZVLLgrm9B/To2roSJl6+oiCq3M f7fw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=Vi0HBzKPf62I6/PIQj3fVLk9Cm1m4ejYrVcQsFzwrDo=; b=MO2OoWJ6QdVWXtjWasEBavn6S2uF4zuMkJVDsWvCEq1pKeao0TzLfjwHkB8b8XPQ2C tA3miwKkl1zntXQWreuddHlaOFEiFaXxMbHKS8zBHg6J6/0JZ1x8zfYU14Yeqzvaehme blH6qUhKmoT6KYp+mi42yVzmSXWbxK+7JfIg0fd1AudjOgIkS/CzFKF6/5xdPh6wF9OE 2cmxDgkxVrS+SaAX1BEocuqVW7Q6qGONYbe9ZEgQlDzRqZKSl6VWvyzIguKMIIXCvA0h TrO76RphutyLC2AiSvmEMUQndYEBhXIwFpq1d7n727ytKIM1GbHtQ+I2Z5A+3Lp5fMvZ cs4Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5302VCo5V7eth38D7xie230l+562wG8swtJg7aDD/oIFxu0+PbZg u6U5yEJWFQGuk0ASQJC1Jnlf4wpYveJqC3WGoTXZWqPi X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxTIbWr1LkdgUEygkZMwXJA5vIDdeQJcCaFPA05tH4FsanqdzjI6ztJoPvuLXOnyijQcClbyAGbsswxB9h+dXU= X-Received: by 2002:a1f:1ecd:: with SMTP id e196mr427806vke.61.1598644614968; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 12:56:54 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: =?UTF-8?B?w5Z6a2FuIEtJUklL?= Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2020 22:56:43 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: How change RSS Hash function for igb ? To: net@freebsd.org X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BdVjh4p1mz4Hm7 X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=R4btbfMb; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of ozkankirik@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::a2c as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=ozkankirik@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.96 / 15.00]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36:c]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.58)[-0.583]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com:dkim]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_MIXED_CHARSET(0.56)[subject]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.96)[-0.957]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.97)[-0.970]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[net@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::a2c:from]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[net] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.33 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2020 19:56:58 -0000 Hi, I need to change RSS Hash function to 2-tuple for igb driver. How can I do it ? I didn't see any sysctl. If there is any way even by modifying driver code I want to try. Regards From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Aug 28 19:58:16 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBF1C3BEC91 for ; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 19:58:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BdVlD56Z0z4Hst for ; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 19:58:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id AF8FE3BEC90; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 19:58:16 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF5AC3BEBC4 for ; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 19:58:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BdVlD4Gjgz4J1R for ; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 19:58:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3667A1A3BE for ; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 19:58:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 07SJwFVs005974 for ; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 19:58:15 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 07SJwFDN005973 for net@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 19:58:15 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 248652] netmap: pkt-gen TX huge pps difference between 11-STABLE and 12-STABLE/CURRENT on ix & ixl NIC Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2020 19:58:15 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: iflib, needs-qa, performance, regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: sg@efficientip.com X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback? mfc-stable12? mfc-stable11- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2020 19:58:16 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D248652 --- Comment #8 from Sylvain Galliano --- After looking at iflib_netmap_timer_adjust() & iflib_netmap_txsync() in sys/net/iflib.c, I made some tuning on kern.hz: Still using X520 with 1 queue ix0: PCI Express Bus: Speed 5.0GT/s Width x8 ix0: netmap queues/slots: TX 1/2048, RX 1/2048 ***************** /boot/loader.conf: kern.hz=3D1000 (default) pkt-gen result: 204.153802 main_thread [2639] 2.562 Mpps (2.567 Mpkts 1.230 Gbps in 1001994 usec) 465.32 avg_batch 99999 min_space 205.155321 main_thread [2639] 2.561 Mpps (2.565 Mpkts 1.229 Gbps in 1001519 usec) 465.45 avg_batch 99999 min_space 5500 irq/s: ***************** /boot/loader.conf: kern.hz=3D1999 pkt-gen result: 41.375049 main_thread [2639] 5.117 Mpps (5.222 Mpkts 2.456 Gbps in 1020510 usec) 465.45 avg_batch 99999 min_space 42.375546 main_thread [2639] 5.118 Mpps (5.121 Mpkts 2.457 Gbps in 1000497 usec) 465.42 avg_batch 99999 min_space 11000 irq/s X2 performance & irq/s ***************** /boot/loader.conf: kern.hz=3D2000 pkt-gen result: 797.608080 main_thread [2639] 2.560 Mpps (2.563 Mpkts 1.229 Gbps in 1001001 usec) 465.50 avg_batch 99999 min_space 798.609079 main_thread [2639] 2.560 Mpps (2.563 Mpkts 1.229 Gbps in 1000999 usec) 465.41 avg_batch 99999 min_space 5500 irq/s Same performance & irq/s as kern.hz=3D1000 (due to limit at 2000 in iflib_netmap_timer_adjust & iflib_netmap_txsync) ***************** Last test, this one I forced 'ticks' parameter to '1' in callout_reset_on on iflib_netmap_timer_adjust & iflib_netmap_txsync by increasing the 2000 limit to 20000 in both functions and put an insame value for kern.hz /boot/loader.conf: kern.hz=3D10000 pkt-gen result: 345.415939 main_thread [2639] 14.880 Mpps (14.890 Mpkts 7.142 Gbps in 10006= 99 usec) 430.97 avg_batch 99999 min_space 346.429134 main_thread [2639] 14.880 Mpps (15.076 Mpkts 7.142 Gbps in 10131= 96 usec) 432.17 avg_batch 99999 min_space 29000 irq/s Same performance as FreeBSD 11 Looks like callout_reset_on to iflib_timer have a look high delay. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Aug 28 23:39:22 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2225B3C5973 for ; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 23:39:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BdbfL08qRz4c9N for ; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 23:39:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 0570F3C5F1C; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 23:39:22 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 053A63C546D for ; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 23:39:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BdbfK6NyHz4cJP for ; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 23:39:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BECA81C771 for ; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 23:39:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 07SNdL8P057366 for ; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 23:39:21 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 07SNdLgD057365 for net@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 23:39:21 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 246003] em(4) Intel I219-V6 on NUC8i5BEH randomly loses carrier or fails over to 100Mbit Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2020 23:39:21 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.1-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: IntelNetworking X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: kbowling@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2020 23:39:22 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D246003 Kevin Bowling changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kbowling@freebsd.org --- Comment #1 from Kevin Bowling --- Can you test stable/12 snapshots? --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Aug 28 23:40:36 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 086443C5C59 for ; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 23:40:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Bdbgl6VGQz4cK1 for ; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 23:40:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id DEE8F3C5FA3; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 23:40:35 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEB4F3C6024 for ; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 23:40:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Bdbgl5dznz4c9q for ; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 23:40:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A69031C775 for ; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 23:40:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 07SNeZfn058408 for ; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 23:40:35 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 07SNeZ0N058407 for net@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 23:40:35 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 246885] if_igb: Loader tunables/LEDs gone after iflib conversion? Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2020 23:40:35 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.1-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: IntelNetworking, regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: kbowling@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2020 23:40:36 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D246885 Kevin Bowling changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kbowling@freebsd.org --- Comment #4 from Kevin Bowling --- (In reply to Jose Luis Duran from comment #3) yes, can you submit a patch? --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sat Aug 29 00:15:59 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A91CC3C6E4D for ; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 00:15:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BdcSb43Mpz4df5 for ; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 00:15:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 8B18B3C6E4A; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 00:15:59 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AE163C7258 for ; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 00:15:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BdcSb3CvXz4dcQ for ; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 00:15:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E3891D3C2 for ; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 00:15:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 07T0Fxkb098892 for ; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 00:15:59 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 07T0FxmF098891 for net@FreeBSD.org; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 00:15:59 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 246003] em(4) Intel I219-V6 on NUC8i5BEH randomly loses carrier or fails over to 100Mbit Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2020 00:15:58 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.1-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: IntelNetworking X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: kumba@gentoo.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2020 00:15:59 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D246003 --- Comment #2 from Joshua Kinard --- (In reply to Kevin Bowling from comment #1) > Can you test stable/12 snapshots? Not easily. The system is currently running 12.1-RELEASE-p8. I can, howev= er, test patches if you have a specific commit that may address the issue and w= orks w/ 12.1-RELEASE (or mostly applies to the source). Currently using the out-of-tree intel-em-kmod driver on this platform, vers= ion 7.7.8 from Intel's download center. The latest version in the ports tree is 7.7.5 and that one also exhibited issues w/ jumbo frames. I ended up givin= g up and went back to mtu 1500, and have not attempted jumbo frames on 7.7.8 yet. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sat Aug 29 00:21:22 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4837A3C7AF5 for ; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 00:21:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BdcZp0JcYz4fBq for ; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 00:21:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 01F303C7AF4; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 00:21:22 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE08A3C7AF3 for ; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 00:21:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BdcZn5sL5z4fQV for ; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 00:21:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC04A1D504 for ; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 00:21:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 07T0LL2N004463 for ; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 00:21:21 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 07T0LLNa004462 for net@FreeBSD.org; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 00:21:21 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 246885] if_igb: Loader tunables/LEDs gone after iflib conversion? Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2020 00:21:21 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.1-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: IntelNetworking, regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: jlduran@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: attachments.created Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2020 00:21:22 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D246885 --- Comment #5 from Jose Luis Duran --- Created attachment 217603 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D217603&action= =3Dedit em.4: Remove non-applicable sections Update manual to reflect current state. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sat Aug 29 00:51:25 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AB673C8A82 for ; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 00:51:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BddFS6csRz3SZ9 for ; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 00:51:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id E14FC3C87A3; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 00:51:24 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFF743C8A81 for ; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 00:51:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BddFS5Qjqz3ST1 for ; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 00:51:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E3DC1DA93 for ; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 00:51:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 07T0pOrw034817 for ; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 00:51:24 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 07T0pOjU034802 for net@FreeBSD.org; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 00:51:24 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 246885] if_igb: Loader tunables/LEDs gone after iflib conversion? Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2020 00:51:24 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.1-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: IntelNetworking, regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: jlduran@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2020 00:51:25 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D246885 --- Comment #6 from Jose Luis Duran --- (In reply to Jose Luis Durhttps://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/an from comment= #5) Wait... I think I have to create a separate igb.4/if_igb.4 man page (revert base r350075), because if_em do have these tunables. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sat Aug 29 01:09:27 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F3213C8A52 for ; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 01:09:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BddfH3pqcz3TT5 for ; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 01:09:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 82E353C8A51; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 01:09:27 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82AE73C89E2 for ; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 01:09:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BddfH2zfSz3T9Y for ; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 01:09:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48D9F1DA46 for ; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 01:09:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 07T19RnE054184 for ; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 01:09:27 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 07T19RcW054183 for net@FreeBSD.org; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 01:09:27 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 246885] if_igb: Loader tunables/LEDs gone after iflib conversion? Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2020 01:09:26 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.1-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: IntelNetworking, regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: jlduran@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: attachments.isobsolete attachments.created Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2020 01:09:27 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D246885 Jose Luis Duran changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #217603|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #7 from Jose Luis Duran --- Created attachment 217604 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D217604&action= =3Dedit Remove LED-related sections Sorry, I was reading the on-line version of the man page and got confused. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sat Aug 29 02:10:52 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CB443CA42A for ; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 02:10:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rmacklem@uoguelph.ca) Received: from CAN01-TO1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-to1can01on0631.outbound.protection.outlook.com [IPv6:2a01:111:f400:fe5d::631]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.protection.outlook.com", Issuer "GlobalSign Organization Validation CA - SHA256 - G3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Bdg156Zrtz3WZW; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 02:10:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rmacklem@uoguelph.ca) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=ZByBEKgJyN0aaHFm38gqrfOoQcUe4I2zHo+7fAFy4AOPqf2xRJy29IceX46nKR2NG+PaxJUS0OlpzDEtyect82g8iQPfrgxKfQoZcE5peUGomTA9568ux0KgBqtXmK2+HUpe5e7SblmWZVDO8R/S5g0jxXchB5Idn+AQyZwdYNoMneiu6uDKF52Cwp9skP6arIV4gfJoh6lKoVmqyh1Z7cnltVunRrMeEUb2eEQevLK+rnGLUOvKr/KAyzx3xAvCSpyspA5s5oxjcvbOjHtestrcNWmkWXeEDJnhww+7hJBvmCr40UqzFz8v56+WxnVeYBOMs4rD2fSqKZDPN+q+0Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=cxvqPRjVUfEFcbhXibAjZC/dT7u4m9JV4iSQ7aqyLB8=; b=PCAKS8GHCt0XFNsgrxhpUELWSdUyJs8oGP5NPja1nvXAwt++EBxRh58/bPm+dClJhzYjPgRQT82OMli053dHyEJ73Rx3xj+7PEpKs/dQ4M5yeJ/wrYA0QGP5W7m/iu2y9IM6Q6Q661wUWqioCFIgO3BtMck8TqVO9hI8ccJZW1rg8DwEjwaEbmYvshA0JyGKtqnCOJJEl1cAUkFUIOpLzWp+8uiDcPi4qdZLLJ8eZdbMuFkJW9LO1fwEtd5iIPUwwFn5zTGklXn0EBdgTOXerMJ9cz+zcChlJlv47WsOoKyU1XaNvc1pfB4svgaPJcOD7db6uc3PILmV00OLgZolTg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=uoguelph.ca; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=uoguelph.ca; dkim=pass header.d=uoguelph.ca; arc=none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=uoguelph.ca; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=cxvqPRjVUfEFcbhXibAjZC/dT7u4m9JV4iSQ7aqyLB8=; b=Y1HIpTvSCMbqWojiUNmDuY2CxEVBq4ms1bumL2TJqvEwobEb1sLjrpDZE8gk76n13otpI8MTmyKlLq//jH/8xKP7qZwPQwvbgU2hnvDfpUEImKAuz7WtD5f9r5eeQvFYqmGjkUjaMuauOIiwbZo+XqOIXdWdeu3DfY0oUFDdW4WxOMQSkOH8Nn2kxPxGq47CxiPdV51eWcHCuuqpidMPKB8aybFC58tW24Q2Ij411slBy5VN2N6VXhdMUiucLSFvkaxUecDON+HjNU+xUT7kKtPsxQzyhufJAOhRU74eQTD4SSvIi2CXFJ3VKxuqj6fTQ1CGngdFSuvCi6uCWsroJA== Received: from QB1PR01MB3364.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (2603:10b6:c00:38::14) by YQBPR0101MB2131.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (2603:10b6:c00:2::16) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3326.23; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 02:10:45 +0000 Received: from QB1PR01MB3364.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM ([fe80::e89a:a655:91ca:4e63]) by QB1PR01MB3364.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM ([fe80::e89a:a655:91ca:4e63%5]) with mapi id 15.20.3305.032; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 02:10:45 +0000 From: Rick Macklem To: "Scheffenegger, Richard" CC: Michael Tuexen , "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: TFO for NFS Thread-Topic: TFO for NFS Thread-Index: AdZ8wCj0gU5kd362TZ21UL2HiTdskgAIvtRNAA75KHAAIdBpaQ== Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2020 02:10:45 +0000 Message-ID: References: , In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-ms-publictraffictype: Email x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: acda91ee-444c-4c2e-7b5a-08d84bc0bd1d x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: YQBPR0101MB2131: x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:9508; x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1 x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: GSMXAVRCUVs5kYziriWYwP/1+vlEVEbd5ZJS9Or2liLiLefgiJWy0kURCBo6zb/IDKzAGEqIoC+YVH/CQn/M69ZnNNAT85FiCrClUUCtAnHs+Pw2k+8tRZG+DTSfO+Qmqb4QkTiaa+OJr4T7TcdxW3qlnCw9Fi6bEMJdkhIgIA97tETLgDTEIbFME4jUREWxt9flQY0Pel3FRM/VGWPRKOLIeNMNKtElm7KCT5q9K8NCcknxcNulE7F/hK6xO7mdvmP6nvkfsbU/JkC0RDw216m1yBWrwGBWpMEOUxpNiVzQ4gpkxTvPFe1Xez+bmaRwA/4KVQNkj1ofAfKIKjpitg== x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:QB1PR01MB3364.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFS:(346002)(39860400002)(366004)(376002)(136003)(396003)(478600001)(64756008)(66556008)(71200400001)(86362001)(55016002)(9686003)(4326008)(76116006)(91956017)(66476007)(66946007)(2906002)(33656002)(66446008)(6506007)(3480700007)(186003)(8676002)(7116003)(7696005)(66574015)(52536014)(786003)(316002)(54906003)(53546011)(5660300002)(8936002)(6916009)(83380400001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: 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 x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: uoguelph.ca X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: QB1PR01MB3364.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: acda91ee-444c-4c2e-7b5a-08d84bc0bd1d X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 29 Aug 2020 02:10:45.1255 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: be62a12b-2cad-49a1-a5fa-85f4f3156a7d X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: /C2Knjik/LsLCj/VETo23P2+QsNmXlxvOoEhtuI2N1hT16WCkdZKrY5YrIo1ZfHHtTTVLX+TeS6WQ2E1dLXpnw== X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: YQBPR0101MB2131 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Bdg156Zrtz3WZW X-Spamd-Bar: ----- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=uoguelph.ca header.s=selector1 header.b=Y1HIpTvS; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=uoguelph.ca; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of rmacklem@uoguelph.ca designates 2a01:111:f400:fe5d::631 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=rmacklem@uoguelph.ca X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-5.90 / 15.00]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.97)[-0.974]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[uoguelph.ca:s=selector1]; FREEFALL_USER(0.00)[rmacklem]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a01:111:f400::/48]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.95)[-0.946]; DWL_DNSWL_LOW(-1.00)[uoguelph.ca:dkim]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[uoguelph.ca:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[uoguelph.ca,none]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.98)[-0.985]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:8075, ipnet:2a01:111:f000::/36, country:US]; ARC_ALLOW(-1.00)[microsoft.com:s=arcselector9901:i=1]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-net] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2020 02:10:52 -0000 Scheffenegger, Richard wrote:=0A= >I know, NFS TCP sessions are some of the most long-lived sessions in regul= ar use.=0A= Ok, so I'll admit I can't wrap my head around this.=0A= It is way out of my area of expertise (so I've added freebsd-net@ to the cc= ), but=0A= it seems to me that NFS is the about the least appropriate use fot TFO.=0A= =0A= It seems that, for TFO to be useful, the application needs to be doing freq= uent=0A= short lived TCP connections and often across WAN/Internet.=0A= NFS mounts do neither of the above.=0A= - They, as we've noted, only normally do a TCP connect at mount time.=0A= Usually run on low latency LAN environments. (High latency connections= =0A= hammer NFS performance, due to its frequent small RPCs that the client= =0A= must wait for replies to sychronously.)=0A= =0A= All you might save is one RTT. Take a look at how many RPCs (each with a RT= T)=0A= happen on an active NFS mount.=0A= =0A= >My rationale is two-fold:=0A= >=0A= >First, having a relatively high-profile use of the TFO option in the core = OS modules >will definitely expose that feature to at least some use.=0A= Well, I don't think it is NFS's job to expose a feature that is not useful = for it.=0A= (If you were to implement this and benchmarking showed a significant=0A= improvement in elapsed time to do an NFS mount, then that could be a=0A= different story.)=0A= =0A= >Second, in case of a network disconnect (or, something with my company doe= s, >that would be most comparable to unassigning and reassigning the server= IP >address between different physical ports), while there is IO load, TFO= may reduce >(ever so slightly) the latency impact of the enqueued IOs.=0A= I'm not sure I understand this. NFS always uses port# 2049.=0A= If you are referring to the host IP address, then wouldn't that be handled = via.=0A= Arp and routing? (Does this require a fresh TCP connection to the same serv= er=0A= IP address?)=0A= =0A= >My plan is first to simply enable the socket option - that should result i= n TFO to >get negotiated for, but no actual latency improvement, while the = traditional >connect() sequence to set up a TCP session is done., from the = client side; the >server side will not need to change, and can send out ini= tial data right away with >the syn/ack (at least in theory, if the syn cont= ained a full NFS request that can be >responded to).=0A= >=0A= >Changing the client to make use of the SYN+data facilities would be a 2nd = step.=0A= Well, during an NFS mount, there is first a TCP connection made by=0A= mount_nfs im userspace and it is only used for a single Null RPC.=0A= --> This checks that the server is up and running.=0A= Then mount_nfs does nmount(2), which will create a second TCP connection=0A= which is normally used until unmount.=0A= --> All you save is the RTT for the one first RPC of many.=0A= =0A= >Also, I shall make this a configurable, since some network devices may inh= ibit TFO >packets, incurring a delay (but that's mostly public internet, no= t private networks >where NFS is being used). Ideally with TFO default to o= n (once it's working >properly), but able to explicitly disable it for cert= ain mounts.=0A= NFS suffered TSO related bugs for several (> 5) years (and I wouldn't be su= rprised=0A= if there are still net device drivers broken such that TSO must be disabled= to make=0A= NFS work ok on them.=0A= =0A= As such, I get very nervous about this kind of thing.=0A= =0A= Reliability always trumps performance when it comes to file system work.=0A= =0A= Now, if you are interested in improving NFS performance over TCP, that=0A= could be a very interesting project, but I doubt TFO would be relevant.=0A= Especially when you look at long fat pipes (TCP connections with a large=0A= delay * bandwidth), there is probably a lot that could be done.=0A= --> Read-ahead, write-back algorithm changes. Read/Write data size.=0A= Throttling/congestion avoidance/window sizing in TCP.=0A= And the list goes on and on...=0A= =0A= I do hope that NFS over TLS allows more use of NFS across the Internet,=0A= so performance work related to NFS running on WAN/Internet connections=0A= would be a great thing to do. (I'm not conversant with the current TCP stac= k,=0A= so I'm not the guy to tackle this.)=0A= =0A= rick=0A= =0A= Richard Scheffenegger=0A= =0A= =0A= -----Original Message-----=0A= From: Rick Macklem =0A= Sent: Freitag, 28. August 2020 04:35=0A= To: Scheffenegger, Richard ; rmacklem@fre= ebsd.org=0A= Cc: Michael Tuexen =0A= Subject: Re: TFO for NFS=0A= =0A= NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links or o= pen attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is saf= e.=0A= =0A= =0A= =0A= =0A= Well, you'll find the soconnect() stuff in sys/rpc/clnt_vc.c.=0A= If you just want to play around with it, have fun.=0A= =0A= As for this being useful in practice, that seems unlikely.=0A= When the kernel RPC code uses TCP it establishes one TCP connection at moun= t time and uses that connection until unmount unless the connection breaks = somehow.=0A= (A server will often disconnect after about 5 minutes of no activity on th= e connection. This almost never happens for NFSv4, since the NFSv4 client = does an RPC every 30sec to maintain the lease against the server.)=0A= --> A new TCP connection usually only happens after a=0A= network partitioning heals.=0A= (There was a bug that caused reconnects during certain cases of signal han= dling, but that was fixed about 3 years ago.)=0A= =0A= rick=0A= =0A= ________________________________________=0A= From: Scheffenegger, Richard =0A= Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2020 6:29 PM=0A= To: rmacklem@freebsd.org=0A= Cc: Michael Tuexen=0A= Subject: TFO for NFS=0A= =0A= CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the University of Guelph. Do= not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and kn= ow the content is safe. If in doubt, forward suspicious emails to IThelp@uo= guelph.ca=0A= =0A= Hi Rick,=0A= =0A= I've seen you are very active with the fbsd nfs code, having branched the n= fs-over-tls project.=0A= =0A= Is anyone else contributing to this project yet?=0A= =0A= After some discussion in todays freebsd-transport call with tuexen@ , I was= wondering if the TCP Fast Open Option could be added as a proof-of-concept= to the in-kernel RPC handler. It may also be a nice augmentation of nfs-ov= er-tls when available, to absorb some of the added tls connection setup lat= ency when available...=0A= =0A= Right now, I am quite unfamiliar with all the rpc code, which appears to ha= ndle all the basic plumbing of NFS;=0A= =0A= Would you be interested in helping me with advice and reviews, in order to = try and get something around TFO working?=0A= =0A= (The reduction in time-to-first-IO by 1 RTT may be helpful in some scenario= s, or when TLS 1.2 instead of 1.3 is in use, where speeding up the tls hand= shake would potentially also be a nice property.=0A= =0A= =0A= Having said all this, for a client to actually make use of TFO, it is likel= y the slight changes / additions need to be done, in order to send out the = initial data (TLS or RPC) right away before any soconnect(), using sendmsg(= ) instead - causing the socket itself to figure out that tcp can connect an= d send data at the same time...=0A= =0A= Best regards,=0A= =0A= Richard Scheffenegger=0A= =0A= =0A= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sat Aug 29 08:58:36 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D1373D2328 for ; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 08:58:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Bdr3b6gZWz49Nj for ; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 08:58:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id E4FB03D22A3; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 08:58:35 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4C143D2327 for ; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 08:58:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Bdr3b5ny8z49Cf for ; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 08:58:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA59D23614 for ; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 08:58:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 07T8wZS9084288 for ; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 08:58:35 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 07T8wZQ7084287 for net@FreeBSD.org; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 08:58:35 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 248958] pptpd + vlan panic Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2020 08:58:35 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: panic X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: kp@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2020 08:58:36 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D248958 Kristof Provost changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kp@freebsd.org --- Comment #2 from Kristof Provost --- I have this: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D26226 I wouldn't expect setting the VNET (which may also be required though) to f= ix an assertion failure because we're not in NET_EPOCH. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sat Aug 29 09:33:56 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 769F63D30DE for ; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 09:33:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Richard.Scheffenegger@netapp.com) Received: from NAM10-BN7-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bn7nam10on20610.outbound.protection.outlook.com [IPv6:2a01:111:f400:7e8a::610]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.protection.outlook.com", Issuer "GlobalSign Organization Validation CA - SHA256 - G3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BdrrM2Wjtz4DM2; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 09:33:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Richard.Scheffenegger@netapp.com) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=Ty1DdPE9ns6WQsKlHRBqgyLFkbuJ80E8eTNNjU9KgSekkqNuin2FDNjqOW3D3nVT51S8ONzyQOjhFJEFAhVVh+d6Zi2IxWN7DP/ODPZlGQAynrKpCN0fV2kKaWBVr+sxhZTDI78jzpdZpSm6GEhNfhnSYtz2MxZ+x6tp6O0BCf8+3IF5Fs5uk0LkWtQFMJjMdGCHbALoRka/OXDhdHFijl8fdhc0FPqpio1goNoDgjVESPw1/RWLUSiNFasFrx/KHRFqYo4Vq82oqR8bjbEYTu4mOhQTTHUjk9CvQBl2Kfqj7yhmdh3UUNdrSDzA0jzS6ZJNcHkx4zogl7jigauXAA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=T+nhk3HJjOoXEbKnbACfi4xQWs7w+PQmrPymzAKQz6M=; b=N6KjnHxG1o57cnGL70bWWoMg6UAe1C/3fwg3++dDcQ8oRIFx3aWM95n4UfoobNZv6NELuEFT6iFsw/NZoyVJQnGzBvSJdrm90biviCZRxqJr1tTrJKqRKRIjykq29jOHuH7HAQimlHK163wPoAam+DrlZxU6fvUOx9/ffi+ggyyH0EpZQ8YBs9DWUo+Y+iE+916ipDRm6pA+mchYyddmD+JDaN1WgZ4rs0k5CCG6YD9tJZRXnzfxU47hh7uHbtsjecQLw4QPGNKmWbwPnNLuRd/WkSrsobcCxS8+TTykZQf6u5Lvr4RqWWvGqrSJ3VDrzToVIgNTG4OA2o6Dsa4xLA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=netapp.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=netapp.com; dkim=pass header.d=netapp.com; arc=none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=netapp.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-netapp-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=T+nhk3HJjOoXEbKnbACfi4xQWs7w+PQmrPymzAKQz6M=; b=mvsX20toQnhqs1N+axkfUyQ+I14iVIoOIidzKsIkb15/GaDdJP+jc4J5unkwnKqoY+VLWpIO4xcT74v7YadSrrbH24MLsEfwyEJko5UxS88+YArZp2IdlS/zZhb1X6PD1R+56ktev1HOKONQl02ScRxQtvAu9XqIekGHuB3ShSI= Received: from SN4PR0601MB3728.namprd06.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:803:51::24) by SN6PR06MB4624.namprd06.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:805:96::10) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3305.24; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 09:33:52 +0000 Received: from SN4PR0601MB3728.namprd06.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::b155:6e3d:2116:e638]) by SN4PR0601MB3728.namprd06.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::b155:6e3d:2116:e638%2]) with mapi id 15.20.3305.026; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 09:33:52 +0000 From: "Scheffenegger, Richard" To: Rick Macklem CC: Michael Tuexen , "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" Subject: RE: TFO for NFS Thread-Topic: TFO for NFS Thread-Index: AdZ8wCj0gU5kd362TZ21UL2HiTdskgAIvtRNAA75KHAAIdBpaQAPxGaA Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2020 09:33:52 +0000 Message-ID: References: , In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: de-AT, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [185.236.167.136] x-ms-publictraffictype: Email x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 603dd8d7-8195-43b6-e6dd-08d84bfea45c x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: SN6PR06MB4624: x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:9508; x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1 x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: n+qQM7hbBfLwgTELYorh5AiOc+Xp9QXNEJNO4v9/Qrqbsm/+xzBm8oCbxRFeuU7+RcYx0vjHgH0M3O7bA0FTF4W0EnCTOnvz21fiRx4rfn1Jrc6CRlsPdfFsbSvOfNMyXb+QoGV0GEZkKdf3Oy1R+oAXFGgLfr50UlYqHgCvDF5zxk4/CGvNgB2J9EWyK1Kyx8vYvcaprw3w+z9QuJ690/Ya0vGEFTFSTCVh+4PtWuLLu80PTlFAp8J/ptqNvE3U2Cpm7WNyRv8jTjjmk/AQDBGQtOkNKwtuO+99u6YSHGmkLrjwPMm6rY0EqlF2JJCFWmQWlF0KoYLgTapzX32eKg== x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:SN4PR0601MB3728.namprd06.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFS:(4636009)(136003)(346002)(366004)(39860400002)(376002)(396003)(26005)(2906002)(5660300002)(66446008)(186003)(8676002)(66476007)(9686003)(52536014)(478600001)(55016002)(64756008)(8936002)(66946007)(71200400001)(66556008)(76116006)(83380400001)(33656002)(66574015)(6916009)(4326008)(316002)(3480700007)(7696005)(296002)(54906003)(86362001)(7116003)(53546011)(6506007); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: 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 x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: netapp.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: SN4PR0601MB3728.namprd06.prod.outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 603dd8d7-8195-43b6-e6dd-08d84bfea45c X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 29 Aug 2020 09:33:52.3190 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 4b0911a0-929b-4715-944b-c03745165b3a X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: 6WGJMD3z4mAQ2jhNPifvu8AgyRTbOnjx7U2INHJvM3THNA+b/+bCrochO1H/y+ELH7ehAkTfC3nSva0llvn/ug== X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: SN6PR06MB4624 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BdrrM2Wjtz4DM2 X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=netapp.onmicrosoft.com header.s=selector1-netapp-onmicrosoft-com header.b=mvsX20to; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of Richard.Scheffenegger@netapp.com designates 2a01:111:f400:7e8a::610 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=Richard.Scheffenegger@netapp.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.86 / 15.00]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.99)[-0.989]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[netapp.onmicrosoft.com:s=selector1-netapp-onmicrosoft-com]; HAS_XOIP(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a01:111:f400::/48]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[netapp.com]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.96)[-0.959]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[netapp.onmicrosoft.com:+]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.42)[-1.415]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:8075, ipnet:2a01:111:f000::/36, country:US]; ARC_ALLOW(-1.00)[microsoft.com:s=arcselector9901:i=1]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-net] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2020 09:33:56 -0000 Hi Rick, > It seems that, for TFO to be useful, the application needs to be doing fr= equent short lived TCP connections and often across WAN/Internet. > NFS mounts do neither of the above. > - They, as we've noted, only normally do a TCP connect at mount time. > Usually run on low latency LAN environments. (High latency connections > hammer NFS performance, due to its frequent small RPCs that the client > must wait for replies to sychronously.) Standard, run of the mill kernel-NFS-client mounts don't. OTOH, TFO is a tr= ansparent feature (on the server side), and requires slight changes on the = client side to be useful. Providing a "worked example" of how to do this (= properly?) might inspire other uses later on.=20 You may have heared from a large corporation mostly known for their Databas= es (and Java). There, the application itself implements a streamlined, ligh= t-weight NFS client (dNFS). In this scenario, each DB task / worker very fr= equently sets up a dedicated NFS session to perform the set of IOs necessar= y to complete its task, and then stop using this tcp session. And there are= a couple more implementations of User-space, streamlined NFS applications,= which utilize many parallel TCP sessions when working against an NFS serve= r, bypassing the in-kernel NFS client. > (If you were to implement this and benchmarking showed a significant imp= rovement in elapsed time to do an NFS mount, then that could be a different= story.) Let me reach out to the maintainer of one of the applications using a users= pace NFS client (a rsync like app, bypassing the in-kernel NFS client for d= ramatic bandwidth gains during simple copy jobs, assuming exclusive access = for the duration). That could be tweaked more easily to show the behavior o= f above mentione, widely deploye DB application. > I'm not sure I understand this. NFS always uses port# 2049. > If you are referring to the host IP address, then wouldn't that be handle= d via. The NFS entity (and state, for v4) is handed off between hosts, while the I= P remains, in this scenario. However, TCP state is not, and the client will= observe a sudden RST when such a migration happened on the server side; th= en it has to re-establish the TCP and reclaim locks (in the v4 case), befor= e being able to continue. Anyway, I try to come up with a proof-of-concept patch, and try to get ben= chmark data. Let's continue the discussion then. Best regards, Richard -----Original Message----- From: Rick Macklem =20 Sent: Samstag, 29. August 2020 04:11 To: Scheffenegger, Richard Cc: Michael Tuexen ; freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: TFO for NFS NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links or o= pen attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is saf= e. Scheffenegger, Richard wrote: >I know, NFS TCP sessions are some of the most long-lived sessions in regul= ar use. Ok, so I'll admit I can't wrap my head around this. It is way out of my area of expertise (so I've added freebsd-net@ to the cc= ), but it seems to me that NFS is the about the least appropriate use fot T= FO. It seems that, for TFO to be useful, the application needs to be doing freq= uent short lived TCP connections and often across WAN/Internet. NFS mounts do neither of the above. - They, as we've noted, only normally do a TCP connect at mount time. Usually run on low latency LAN environments. (High latency connections hammer NFS performance, due to its frequent small RPCs that the client must wait for replies to sychronously.) All you might save is one RTT. Take a look at how many RPCs (each with a RT= T) happen on an active NFS mount. >My rationale is two-fold: > >First, having a relatively high-profile use of the TFO option in the core = OS modules >will definitely expose that feature to at least some use. Well, I don't think it is NFS's job to expose a feature that is not useful = for it. (If you were to implement this and benchmarking showed a significant impro= vement in elapsed time to do an NFS mount, then that could be a different s= tory.) >Second, in case of a network disconnect (or, something with my company doe= s, >that would be most comparable to unassigning and reassigning the server= IP >address between different physical ports), while there is IO load, TFO= may reduce >(ever so slightly) the latency impact of the enqueued IOs. I'm not sure I understand this. NFS always uses port# 2049. If you are referring to the host IP address, then wouldn't that be handled = via. Arp and routing? (Does this require a fresh TCP connection to the same serv= er IP address?) >My plan is first to simply enable the socket option - that should result i= n TFO to >get negotiated for, but no actual latency improvement, while the = traditional >connect() sequence to set up a TCP session is done., from the = client side; the >server side will not need to change, and can send out ini= tial data right away with >the syn/ack (at least in theory, if the syn cont= ained a full NFS request that can be >responded to). > >Changing the client to make use of the SYN+data facilities would be a 2nd = step. Well, during an NFS mount, there is first a TCP connection made by mount_nf= s im userspace and it is only used for a single Null RPC. --> This checks that the server is up and running. Then mount_nfs does nmount(2), which will create a second TCP connection wh= ich is normally used until unmount. --> All you save is the RTT for the one first RPC of many. >Also, I shall make this a configurable, since some network devices may inh= ibit TFO >packets, incurring a delay (but that's mostly public internet, no= t private networks >where NFS is being used). Ideally with TFO default to o= n (once it's working >properly), but able to explicitly disable it for cert= ain mounts. NFS suffered TSO related bugs for several (> 5) years (and I wouldn't be su= rprised if there are still net device drivers broken such that TSO must be = disabled to make NFS work ok on them. As such, I get very nervous about this kind of thing. Reliability always trumps performance when it comes to file system work. Now, if you are interested in improving NFS performance over TCP, that coul= d be a very interesting project, but I doubt TFO would be relevant. Especially when you look at long fat pipes (TCP connections with a large de= lay * bandwidth), there is probably a lot that could be done. --> Read-ahead, write-back algorithm changes. Read/Write data size. Throttling/congestion avoidance/window sizing in TCP. And the list goes on and on... I do hope that NFS over TLS allows more use of NFS across the Internet, so = performance work related to NFS running on WAN/Internet connections would b= e a great thing to do. (I'm not conversant with the current TCP stack, so I= 'm not the guy to tackle this.) rick Richard Scheffenegger -----Original Message----- From: Rick Macklem Sent: Freitag, 28. August 2020 04:35 To: Scheffenegger, Richard ; rmacklem@fre= ebsd.org Cc: Michael Tuexen Subject: Re: TFO for NFS NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links or o= pen attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is saf= e. Well, you'll find the soconnect() stuff in sys/rpc/clnt_vc.c. If you just want to play around with it, have fun. As for this being useful in practice, that seems unlikely. When the kernel RPC code uses TCP it establishes one TCP connection at moun= t time and uses that connection until unmount unless the connection breaks = somehow. (A server will often disconnect after about 5 minutes of no activity on th= e connection. This almost never happens for NFSv4, since the NFSv4 client = does an RPC every 30sec to maintain the lease against the server.) --> A new TCP connection usually only happens after a network partitioning heals. (There was a bug that caused reconnects during certain cases of signal han= dling, but that was fixed about 3 years ago.) rick ________________________________________ From: Scheffenegger, Richard Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2020 6:29 PM To: rmacklem@freebsd.org Cc: Michael Tuexen Subject: TFO for NFS CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the University of Guelph. Do= not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and kn= ow the content is safe. If in doubt, forward suspicious emails to IThelp@uo= guelph.ca Hi Rick, I've seen you are very active with the fbsd nfs code, having branched the n= fs-over-tls project. Is anyone else contributing to this project yet? After some discussion in todays freebsd-transport call with tuexen@ , I was= wondering if the TCP Fast Open Option could be added as a proof-of-concept= to the in-kernel RPC handler. It may also be a nice augmentation of nfs-ov= er-tls when available, to absorb some of the added tls connection setup lat= ency when available... Right now, I am quite unfamiliar with all the rpc code, which appears to ha= ndle all the basic plumbing of NFS; Would you be interested in helping me with advice and reviews, in order to = try and get something around TFO working? (The reduction in time-to-first-IO by 1 RTT may be helpful in some scenario= s, or when TLS 1.2 instead of 1.3 is in use, where speeding up the tls hand= shake would potentially also be a nice property. Having said all this, for a client to actually make use of TFO, it is likel= y the slight changes / additions need to be done, in order to send out the = initial data (TLS or RPC) right away before any soconnect(), using sendmsg(= ) instead - causing the socket itself to figure out that tcp can connect an= d send data at the same time... Best regards, Richard Scheffenegger From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sat Aug 29 14:49:27 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FE113B24D6 for ; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 14:49:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BdzrR2vN3z4Zft for ; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 14:49:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 635C03B260B; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 14:49:27 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6324B3B24D5 for ; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 14:49:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BdzrR22fsz4ZjG for ; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 14:49:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2ABEA27707 for ; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 14:49:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 07TEnR8l066492 for ; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 14:49:27 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 07TEnRu6066490 for net@FreeBSD.org; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 14:49:27 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 248958] pptpd + vlan panic Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2020 14:49:26 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: panic X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: glebius@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2020 14:49:27 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D248958 --- Comment #3 from Gleb Smirnoff --- > https://reviews.freebsd.org/D26226 Right now reviews.freebsd.org is returning 502 for me, so I can't comment there. I believe the patch is incorrect there. In the new epoch synced network sta= ck the packet flow of netgraph shall all be covered by epoch. And eventually netgraph internal synchronization shall be converted to epoch. Thus, this is responsibility of an entrance nodes to enter the epoch, not the exit nodes. ng_socket does that. However, there is one peculiarity, see r358193. In this particular case what happens in ng_pppoe is that control message ca= ll (not covered by epoch) sends a packet down the node, which should be covere= d by epoch. So, this is ng_pppoe's ng_pppoe_rcvmsg() that needs to enter epoch u= ntil some better solution is devised to address the problem described in r358193. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sat Aug 29 22:08:51 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46E103BF347 for ; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 22:08:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Bf9bR18W3z486L for ; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 22:08:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 278C93BF428; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 22:08:51 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 275843BF346 for ; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 22:08:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Bf9bR0LS6z47qC for ; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 22:08:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D9752CA1F for ; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 22:08:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 07TM8oXw071784 for ; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 22:08:50 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 07TM8oTZ071783 for net@FreeBSD.org; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 22:08:50 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 248958] pptpd + vlan panic Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2020 22:08:50 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: panic X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: kp@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2020 22:08:51 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D248958 --- Comment #4 from Kristof Provost --- (In reply to Gleb Smirnoff from comment #3) Thanks. I've updated the patch. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=