From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sun Oct 25 15:30:34 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C5F745176D for ; Sun, 25 Oct 2020 15:30:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CK23Y6fN2z4CM0 for ; Sun, 25 Oct 2020 15:30:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id E26064516CE; Sun, 25 Oct 2020 15:30:33 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E22C245176C for ; Sun, 25 Oct 2020 15:30:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CK23Y5kWrz4C9C for ; Sun, 25 Oct 2020 15:30:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A950EB7C1 for ; Sun, 25 Oct 2020 15:30:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 09PFUXtQ039993 for ; Sun, 25 Oct 2020 15:30:33 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 09PFUX7C039991 for net@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 25 Oct 2020 15:30:33 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 248652] iflib: netmap pkt-gen large TX performance difference between 11-STABLE and 12-STABLE/CURRENT on ix & ixl NIC Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2020 15:30:30 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: iflib, needs-qa, performance, regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: vmaffione@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: vmaffione@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback? mfc-stable12? mfc-stable11- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: attachments.created Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2020 15:30:34 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D248652 --- Comment #35 from Vincenzo Maffione --- Created attachment 219062 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D219062&action= =3Dedit netmap tx timer w/queue intr enable + honor IPCP_TX_INTR in ixl_txd_encap Extension of the last one (218932), to also call the IFDI tx queue interrupt enable, similarly to what the iflib_timer() code already does. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sun Oct 25 15:38:53 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B31B451E95 for ; Sun, 25 Oct 2020 15:38:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CK2F90vNFz4C9Y for ; Sun, 25 Oct 2020 15:38:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 1EEE7451DB4; Sun, 25 Oct 2020 15:38:53 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EBAB451E94 for ; Sun, 25 Oct 2020 15:38:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CK2F9026Vz4CfR for ; Sun, 25 Oct 2020 15:38:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D43B8BCA2 for ; Sun, 25 Oct 2020 15:38:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 09PFcqlG049302 for ; Sun, 25 Oct 2020 15:38:52 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 09PFcqem049301 for net@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 25 Oct 2020 15:38:52 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 248652] iflib: netmap pkt-gen large TX performance difference between 11-STABLE and 12-STABLE/CURRENT on ix & ixl NIC Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2020 15:38:52 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: iflib, needs-qa, performance, regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: vmaffione@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: vmaffione@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback? mfc-stable12? mfc-stable11- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2020 15:38:53 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D248652 --- Comment #36 from Vincenzo Maffione --- (In reply to Vincenzo Maffione from comment #35) I would ask for advice from the Intel guys here... I'm trying to compare stable/11 vs current, regarding how TX interrupts are handled. It looks like in stable/11 MSI-x handlers are shared for the TX an= d RX queue, while in current TX interrupts are not used. Also, in stable/11 the interrupt handler seems to do a disable_queue and th= en enable_queue, while on current I only see the enable_queue step (IFDI_TX_QUEUE_INTR_ENABLE). Therefore, in the last patch I also add the enable_queue step in the netmap timer routine. It may be worth giving a try to see if this fixes the ixl is= sue. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sun Oct 25 17:33:00 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F3264543E8 for ; Sun, 25 Oct 2020 17:33:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from darcy@druid.net) Received: from mail.vex.net (mail.vex.net [98.158.139.68]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CK4mq3fc7z4KQn for ; Sun, 25 Oct 2020 17:32:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from darcy@druid.net) Received: from imp.druid.net (unknown [98.158.128.36]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: darcy) by mail.vex.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1E1B439F1A for ; Sun, 25 Oct 2020 13:32:58 -0400 (EDT) To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org From: D'Arcy Cain Autocrypt: addr=darcy@druid.net; keydata= xjMEXu32OxYJKwYBBAHaRw8BAQdAD839OEQVMqCs45KVwLKg4srvl51WsVhMpTGOd9z3Ym3N HUQnQXJjeSBDYWluIDxkYXJjeUBkcnVpZC5uZXQ+wpYEExYIAD4WIQSQJTNYM0vv3aTmBCs/ 5DDweYZnXQUCXu32OwIbAwUJCWYBgAULCQgHAgYVCgkICwIEFgIDAQIeAQIXgAAKCRA/5DDw eYZnXWAxAP9cDL1j4koUFRBNQyC4iMp/cx5KnozmtsFtiTrWdZBrIwD6A2rLFx60tJryd/qp SZpXk7UPDLH/PY1hstjx9WUbXQjOOARe7fY7EgorBgEEAZdVAQUBAQdAbK0SOaTRrkI2QAWz rCz29D2RDOgGTvEbDpyWiyA5RhQDAQgHwn4EGBYIACYWIQSQJTNYM0vv3aTmBCs/5DDweYZn XQUCXu32OwIbDAUJCWYBgAAKCRA/5DDweYZnXaNOAQDC77ymNjoMZQVgDCcmgZEk6IZxn45k nyW17OYCpRctvgD9Fg3aocAbHK7V9AhmSbDPxLNQygQUPjjU7Cyn97b1cQs= Subject: Bridge woes Message-ID: Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2020 13:32:57 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.3.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ukcHSk4yT6xuriUcua6QNe4HII3hchC7M" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4CK4mq3fc7z4KQn X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of darcy@druid.net has no SPF policy when checking 98.158.139.68) smtp.mailfrom=darcy@druid.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.66 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.85)[-0.852]; HAS_ATTACHMENT(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.20)[multipart/signed,multipart/mixed,text/plain,application/pgp-keys]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-net@freebsd.org]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.23)[-0.230]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[druid.net]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.48)[-0.482]; SIGNED_PGP(-2.00)[]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; RCVD_NO_TLS_LAST(0.10)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:+,3:+,4:+,5:~]; ASN(0.00)[asn:19842, ipnet:98.158.139.0/24, country:CA]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-net] X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.33 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2020 17:33:00 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --ukcHSk4yT6xuriUcua6QNe4HII3hchC7M Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="fQk8NWtQjQ1W8YzL5tsFMbvjcPRQJR0cH"; protected-headers="v1" From: D'Arcy Cain To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Message-ID: Subject: Bridge woes --fQk8NWtQjQ1W8YzL5tsFMbvjcPRQJR0cH Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------6F0C35D91F48B55915269250" Content-Language: en-US This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------6F0C35D91F48B55915269250 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I have been trying to solve this problem for a week now. I have been=20 emailing the virtualization list (Re: When is a switch not a switch?)=20 because it had to do with vm-bhyve but now I am wondering if it is someth= ing=20 else. Maybe some of the network experts here can help. Basically I have the following in my rc.conf: set -- $(/sbin/ifconfig -l ether); eth0=3D$1 eth1=3D$2 eval "ifconfig_${eth0}_name=3D\"eth0\"" # Public facing network eval "ifconfig_${eth1}_name=3D\"eth1\"" # Private network ifconfig_eth0=3D"inet 0x629e8b${me}/27" ifconfig_eth0_ipv6=3D"inet6 2605:2600:1001::${me}/64" ifconfig_eth1=3D"inet 0xc0a897${me}/24" ifconfig_eth1_ipv6=3D"inet6 fc00:97:97::${me}/64" vm_enable=3D"YES" vm_dir=3D"zfs:zroot/VM" vm_delay=3D"5" Everything there does what it is supposed to do. In rc.local I do this: sysctl -w net.inet.ip.forwarding=3D1 sysctl -w net.inet6.ip6.forwarding=3D1 vm switch create public vm switch add public eth0 vm switch create private vm switch add private eth1 I know that I can put those sysctls in /etc/sysctl.conf but I have reason= s=20 for doing it this way. So far so good. I then fire up a VM by running "vm install". I haven't = been able to get an actual working system yet due to the following proble= , In the VM I set an IP address on the same network as the host: vtnet0: flags=3D8943 m= etric=20 0 mtu 1500 options=3D80028 ether 22:22:22:22:22:41 inet 98.158.139.71 netmask 0xffffffe0 broadcast 98.158.139.95 media: Ethernet 10Gbase-T status: active nd6 options=3D29 I set up /etc/resolv.conf and default routes as expected. At that point = I=20 can ping any IP address on my internal network as well as any ICMP friend= ly=20 sites anywhere on the Internet. However, I can't make a TCP connection t= o=20 anywhere except to the host or, for some odd reason, one other host on my= =20 network. I have tried putting the public IP on the bridge but other than complicat= ing=20 my startup scripts it acts exactly the same. Can anyone make any sense out of this? --=20 D'Arcy J.M. Cain | Democracy is three wolves http://www.druid.net/darcy/ | and a sheep voting on +1 416 788 2246 (DoD#0082) (eNTP) | what's for dinner. IM: darcy@VybeNetworks.com, VoIP: sip:darcy@druid.net Disclaimer: By sending an email to ANY of my addresses you are agreeing that: 1. I am by definition, "the intended recipient". 2. All information in the email is mine to do with as I see fit and make such financial profit, political mileage, or good joke as it lends itself to. In particular, I may quote it where I please. 3. I may take the contents as representing the views of your company if I so wish. 4. This overrides any disclaimer or statement of confidentiality that may be included or implied in your message. --------------6F0C35D91F48B55915269250-- --fQk8NWtQjQ1W8YzL5tsFMbvjcPRQJR0cH-- --ukcHSk4yT6xuriUcua6QNe4HII3hchC7M Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="OpenPGP_signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="OpenPGP_signature" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- wnsEABYIACMWIQSQJTNYM0vv3aTmBCs/5DDweYZnXQUCX5W2yQUDAAAAAAAKCRA/5DDweYZnXdEG AP9GlxiggFNri6oBE96vY+trpzp7G9frbO5QhRTJ+CeLcAD9Fdf1c/gFlExyfDoIhhdjwLD6tdiR EuH8+kcG0sGLUAY= =BK6y -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ukcHSk4yT6xuriUcua6QNe4HII3hchC7M-- From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sun Oct 25 21:00:05 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE7C7458267 for ; Sun, 25 Oct 2020 21:00:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CK9Mn64Yjz4WTb for ; Sun, 25 Oct 2020 21:00:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id CEBDF4584A0; Sun, 25 Oct 2020 21:00:05 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE8114582C2 for ; Sun, 25 Oct 2020 21:00:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CK9Mn59dNz4WNg for ; Sun, 25 Oct 2020 21:00:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A6E0F8C8 for ; Sun, 25 Oct 2020 21:00:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 09PL059X041396 for ; Sun, 25 Oct 2020 21:00:05 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from bugzilla@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 09PL05mw041395 for net@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 25 Oct 2020 21:00:05 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <202010252100.09PL05mw041395@kenobi.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: bugzilla set sender to bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: Problem reports for net@FreeBSD.org that need special attention Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2020 21:00:05 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.33 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2020 21:00:06 -0000 To view an individual PR, use: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=(Bug Id). The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users, which need special attention. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and obsolete releases. Status | Bug Id | Description ------------+-----------+--------------------------------------------------- In Progress | 221146 | [ixgbe] Problem with second laggport In Progress | 235700 | oce(4) driver causes fatal trap 12 on boot with e New | 204438 | setsockopt() handling of kern.ipc.maxsockbuf limi New | 213410 | [carp] service netif restart causes hang only whe Open | 7556 | ppp: sl_compress_init() will fail if called anyth Open | 166724 | if_re(4): watchdog timeout Open | 187835 | ngctl(8) strange behavior when adding more than 5 Open | 193452 | Dell PowerEdge 210 II -- Kernel panic bce (broadc Open | 194453 | dummynet(4): pipe config bw parameter limited to Open | 200319 | Bridge+CARP crashes/freezes Open | 202510 | [CARP] advertisements sourced from CARP IP cause Open | 207261 | netmap: Doesn't do TX sync with kqueue Open | 217978 | dhclient: Support supersede statement for option Open | 222273 | igb(4): Kernel panic (fatal trap 12) due to netwo Open | 225438 | panic in6_unlink_ifa() due to race Open | 227720 | Kernel panic in ppp server Open | 230807 | if_alc(4): Driver not working for Killer Networki Open | 235524 | igb(4): Ethernet interface loses active link stat Open | 236888 | ppp daemon: Allow MTU to be overridden for PPPoE Open | 236983 | bnxt(4) VLAN not operational unless explicit "ifc Open | 237072 | netgraph(4): performance issue [on HardenedBSD]? Open | 237840 | Removed dummynet dependency on ipfw Open | 238324 | Add XG-C100C/AQtion AQC107 10GbE NIC driver Open | 240530 | netgraph/ng_source: Allow ng_source to inject int Open | 240944 | em(4): Crash with Intel 82571EB NIC with AMD Pile Open | 241106 | tun/ppp: panic: vm_fault: fault on nofault entry Open | 241162 | Panic in closefp() triggered by nginx (uwsgi with Open | 243463 | ix0: Watchdog timeout Open | 244066 | divert: Add sysctls for divert socket send and re Open | 244706 | panic: NULL dereference inside __mtx_lock_sleep() Open | 118111 | rc: network.subr Add MAC address based interface 31 problems total for which you should take action. From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Mon Oct 26 08:29:35 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C281043EBBD for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 08:29:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CKSgM4rKBz3f7f for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 08:29:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id A629943E96D; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 08:29:35 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5F4443EC96 for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 08:29:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CKSgM3yKsz3fLj for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 08:29:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B3C11777B for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 08:29:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 09Q8TZi3052493 for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 08:29:35 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 09Q8TZ31052492 for net@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 08:29:35 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 248652] iflib: netmap pkt-gen large TX performance difference between 11-STABLE and 12-STABLE/CURRENT on ix & ixl NIC Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2020 08:29:35 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: iflib, needs-qa, performance, regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: sg@efficientip.com X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: vmaffione@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback? mfc-stable12? mfc-stable11- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2020 08:29:35 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D248652 --- Comment #37 from Sylvain Galliano --- (In reply to Vincenzo Maffione from comment #36) I have tested last patch (netmap tx timer w/queue intr enable + honor IPCP_TX_INTR in ixl_txd_encap): same results --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Mon Oct 26 21:39:19 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8865644FE1B for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 21:39:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CKpBb378Sz3Xr3 for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 21:39:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 698CD44FC74; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 21:39:19 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6958C44FE1A for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 21:39:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CKpBb2BTkz3Xw2 for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 21:39:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D8E220D1A for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 21:39:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 09QLdJbY079538 for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 21:39:19 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 09QLdJdZ079537 for net@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 21:39:19 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 248652] iflib: netmap pkt-gen large TX performance difference between 11-STABLE and 12-STABLE/CURRENT on ix & ixl NIC Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2020 21:39:17 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: iflib, needs-qa, performance, regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: vmaffione@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: vmaffione@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback? mfc-stable12? mfc-stable11- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: attachments.created Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2020 21:39:19 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D248652 --- Comment #38 from Vincenzo Maffione --- Created attachment 219121 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D219121&action= =3Dedit Cleaned up netmap tx timer patch (no sysctl) --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Mon Oct 26 21:47:22 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C2AE4500CD for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 21:47:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CKpMt1JJZz3Y0x for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 21:47:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 2AF174500CC; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 21:47:22 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AB7244FEC4 for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 21:47:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CKpMt025Dz3Y5w for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 21:47:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D881220D32 for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 21:47:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 09QLlLKd088958 for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 21:47:21 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 09QLlLpp088957 for net@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 21:47:21 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 248652] iflib: netmap pkt-gen large TX performance difference between 11-STABLE and 12-STABLE/CURRENT on ix & ixl NIC Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2020 21:47:20 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: iflib, needs-qa, performance, regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: vmaffione@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: vmaffione@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback? mfc-stable12? mfc-stable11- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2020 21:47:22 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D248652 --- Comment #39 from Vincenzo Maffione --- (In reply to Sylvain Galliano from comment #37) Ok thanks. It was worth a try. I guess we'll need some help from Intel here. In the meanwhile, I would like to commit the netmap tx timer change only. I attached a cleaned up patch, with an hardcoded value for the netmap timer. I would avoid to add a new sysctl for something that may be changed again s= oon. In any case, the patch is meant to improve a lot the current situation for = both ix and ixl. Could you please run your tests again on ix and ixl to check that you get numbers that are consistent with the ones you reported in comment n. 16? --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Oct 27 03:45:08 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D99E143B472 for ; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 03:45:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CKyJh5Sysz4Dbt for ; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 03:45:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id BBAA443B08E; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 03:45:08 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB72243B482 for ; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 03:45:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CKyJh4XYVz4Dcg for ; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 03:45:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 804EF25505 for ; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 03:45:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 09R3j8K2006349 for ; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 03:45:08 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 09R3j8s3006348 for net@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 03:45:08 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 249058] Intel X710-T2L Ethernet Adapter not detected in FreeBSD 12.1 Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2020 03:45:08 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.1-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: IntelNetworking X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: lwhsu@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: erj@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc resolution bug_status keywords assigned_to Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2020 03:45:08 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D249058 Li-Wen Hsu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lwhsu@FreeBSD.org Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|In Progress |Closed Keywords|regression | Assignee|net@FreeBSD.org |erj@freebsd.org --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Oct 27 17:17:35 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 687864554BC for ; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 17:17:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CLJL729qwz3dBw for ; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 17:17:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 4ABD145517B; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 17:17:35 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A8444552FF for ; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 17:17:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CLJL71JBHz3dYK for ; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 17:17:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 10916EA79 for ; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 17:17:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 09RHHYkn082708 for ; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 17:17:34 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 09RHHY0F082707 for net@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 17:17:34 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 248652] iflib: netmap pkt-gen large TX performance difference between 11-STABLE and 12-STABLE/CURRENT on ix & ixl NIC Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2020 17:17:34 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: iflib, needs-qa, performance, regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: sg@efficientip.com X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: vmaffione@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback? mfc-stable12? mfc-stable11- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2020 17:17:35 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D248652 --- Comment #40 from Sylvain Galliano --- (In reply to Vincenzo Maffione from comment #39) results are all good for ix (X520) NIC (+14M pps, same as FreeBSD 11) No changes in ixl (same results as comment #16) --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Oct 27 21:21:38 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74C7345AABB for ; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 21:21:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CLPlk2YL7z4Dmn for ; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 21:21:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 5790B45AA43; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 21:21:38 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5752F45AABA for ; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 21:21:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CLPlk1W16z4Drn for ; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 21:21:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1817711CB3 for ; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 21:21:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 09RLLbb1056613 for ; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 21:21:37 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 09RLLbup056612 for net@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 21:21:37 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 248652] iflib: netmap pkt-gen large TX performance difference between 11-STABLE and 12-STABLE/CURRENT on ix & ixl NIC Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2020 21:21:36 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: iflib, needs-qa, performance, regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: vmaffione@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: vmaffione@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback? mfc-stable12? mfc-stable11- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2020 21:21:38 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D248652 Vincenzo Maffione changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|Open |In Progress --- Comment #41 from Vincenzo Maffione --- (In reply to Sylvain Galliano from comment #40) Thank you for confirming. In the meanwhile I'll commit this change. Maybe we should open a separate issue for the ixl regression? Now we know t= hat it is caused by the RS flag being set an all the TX descriptors. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Oct 27 21:54:10 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA58345B545 for ; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 21:54:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CLQTG43n2z4GVr for ; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 21:54:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 8988445B640; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 21:54:10 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8951145B728 for ; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 21:54:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CLQTG39dvz4GfY for ; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 21:54:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 504FC12522 for ; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 21:54:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 09RLsAcZ095051 for ; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 21:54:10 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from bugzilla@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 09RLsAGF095050 for net@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 21:54:10 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: bugzilla set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 248652] iflib: netmap pkt-gen large TX performance difference between 11-STABLE and 12-STABLE/CURRENT on ix & ixl NIC Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2020 21:54:08 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: iflib, needs-qa, performance, regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: commit-hook@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: vmaffione@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback? mfc-stable12? mfc-stable11- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2020 21:54:10 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D248652 --- Comment #42 from commit-hook@FreeBSD.org --- A commit references this bug: Author: vmaffione Date: Tue Oct 27 21:53:33 UTC 2020 New revision: 367093 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/367093 Log: iflib: add per-tx-queue netmap timer The way netmap TX is handled in iflib when TX interrupts are not used (IFC_NETMAP_TX_IRQ not set) has some issues: - The netmap_tx_irq() function gets called by iflib_timer(), which gets scheduled with tick granularity (hz). This is not frequent enough for 10Gbps NICs and beyond (e.g., ixgbe or ixl). The end result is that the transmitting netmap application is not woken up fast enough to saturate the link with small packets. - The iflib_timer() functions also calls isc_txd_credits_update() to ask for more TX completion updates. However, this violates the netmap requirement that only txsync can access the TX queue for datapath operations. Only netmap_tx_irq() may be called out of the txsync context. This change introduces per-tx-queue netmap timers, using microsecond granularity to ensure that netmap_tx_irq() can be called often enough to allow for maximum packet rate. The timer routine simply calls netmap_tx_irq() to wake up the netmap application. The latter will wake up and call txsync to collect TX completion updates. This change brings back line rate speed with small packets for ixgbe. For the time being, timer expiration is hardcoded to 90 microseconds, in order to avoid introducing a new sysctl. We may eventually implement an adaptive expiration period or use another deferred work mechanism in place of timers. Also, fix the timers usage to make sure that each queue is serviced by a different CPU. PR: 248652 Reported by: sg@efficientip.com MFC after: 2 weeks Changes: head/sys/net/iflib.c --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Oct 28 11:31:48 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B5A2443228 for ; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 11:31:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from darcy@druid.net) Received: from mail.vex.net (mail.vex.net [98.158.139.68]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CLmcg4kvNz3yv5 for ; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 11:31:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from darcy@druid.net) Received: from imp.druid.net (unknown [38.64.181.54]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: darcy) by mail.vex.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DA2523E2DE for ; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 07:31:40 -0400 (EDT) To: FreeBSD Net References: <20201025204937.695be500@bsd64.grem.de> <21be1778-0567-d5b6-741a-ad620fc4fb27@druid.net> <20201026160919.2ed76939@bsd64.grem.de> <0a31052f-ce44-0a77-8424-6aba24658ab7@druid.net> <20201027195849.24a9a068@bsd64.grem.de> From: D'Arcy Cain Autocrypt: addr=darcy@druid.net; keydata= xjMEXu32OxYJKwYBBAHaRw8BAQdAD839OEQVMqCs45KVwLKg4srvl51WsVhMpTGOd9z3Ym3N HUQnQXJjeSBDYWluIDxkYXJjeUBkcnVpZC5uZXQ+wpYEExYIAD4WIQSQJTNYM0vv3aTmBCs/ 5DDweYZnXQUCXu32OwIbAwUJCWYBgAULCQgHAgYVCgkICwIEFgIDAQIeAQIXgAAKCRA/5DDw eYZnXWAxAP9cDL1j4koUFRBNQyC4iMp/cx5KnozmtsFtiTrWdZBrIwD6A2rLFx60tJryd/qp SZpXk7UPDLH/PY1hstjx9WUbXQjOOARe7fY7EgorBgEEAZdVAQUBAQdAbK0SOaTRrkI2QAWz rCz29D2RDOgGTvEbDpyWiyA5RhQDAQgHwn4EGBYIACYWIQSQJTNYM0vv3aTmBCs/5DDweYZn XQUCXu32OwIbDAUJCWYBgAAKCRA/5DDweYZnXaNOAQDC77ymNjoMZQVgDCcmgZEk6IZxn45k nyW17OYCpRctvgD9Fg3aocAbHK7V9AhmSbDPxLNQygQUPjjU7Cyn97b1cQs= Subject: Re: Bridge woes Message-ID: <6ca8956a-76d0-8d83-e1ce-015de1fcf2bd@druid.net> Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2020 07:31:39 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20201027195849.24a9a068@bsd64.grem.de> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="MJlay0mUmwnRupFwTS4RHwyQPzxU1qewr" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4CLmcg4kvNz3yv5 X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of darcy@druid.net has no SPF policy when checking 98.158.139.68) smtp.mailfrom=darcy@druid.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.10 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.04)[0.038]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.94)[-0.940]; HAS_ATTACHMENT(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.20)[multipart/signed,multipart/mixed,text/plain,application/pgp-keys]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-net@freebsd.org]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[druid.net]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.10)[-0.102]; SIGNED_PGP(-2.00)[]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; RCVD_NO_TLS_LAST(0.10)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:+,3:+,4:+,5:~]; ASN(0.00)[asn:19842, ipnet:98.158.139.0/24, country:CA]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-net] X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.33 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2020 11:31:48 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --MJlay0mUmwnRupFwTS4RHwyQPzxU1qewr Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="X2NYO6ao6VwP3S38HeU0JWult9x6HjAgy"; protected-headers="v1" From: D'Arcy Cain To: FreeBSD Net Message-ID: <6ca8956a-76d0-8d83-e1ce-015de1fcf2bd@druid.net> Subject: Re: Bridge woes References: <20201025204937.695be500@bsd64.grem.de> <21be1778-0567-d5b6-741a-ad620fc4fb27@druid.net> <20201026160919.2ed76939@bsd64.grem.de> <0a31052f-ce44-0a77-8424-6aba24658ab7@druid.net> <20201027195849.24a9a068@bsd64.grem.de> In-Reply-To: <20201027195849.24a9a068@bsd64.grem.de> --X2NYO6ao6VwP3S38HeU0JWult9x6HjAgy Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------447DEE3E4C8ECFE948C40F54" Content-Language: en-US This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------447DEE3E4C8ECFE948C40F54 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 10/27/20 2:58 PM, Michael Gmelin wrote: I hope you don't mind but I reverted this conversation back to the list i= n=20 case it gives someone else any ideas. > Hi, >=20 > I tried to reproduce the problem on my home network, but things just > work as expected. >=20 > I could run VMs with IPs off the local network, fixed ones as well as > DHCP. >=20 > The topology looks a bit different: > vm->server->router ->(nat)-> internet > | > + dhcp/dns I suppose that that is essentially the same but let me see if I get it. = You=20 have a network, say 192.168.1.0/24, behind your NAT router. You have=20 physical servers like 192.168.1.1 and 192.168.1.2 on this network. You t= hen=20 put a VM on the .1 host numbered 192.168.1.3 and it can connect to=20 192.168.1.2. Is that correct? > I would speculate that there's either something going on with > the switch (you might want to take a look at it), or you're experiencin= g > some sort of asymmetric routing issue (ping/icmp is usually just fine Not sure what that could be. It's not just a problem with external hosts= =2E=20 Hosts on the same network are also showing the symptoms. Another point i= s=20 that I can access it inbound. It's only outbound connections that don't = work. > with that). Or it might be something with the bge driver (I'm using em The only server that it can connect to is running bce. I have some em=20 servers but it doesn't connect to those. > here). I assume you already tried disabling all sorts of offloading to > see if it makes a difference? Yep. I tried -tso -lro -rxcsum -rxcsum6 -txcsum -txcsum6 -vlanhwtag=20 -vlanhwtso and subsets of that. > Other than that I would suggest to play with tcpdump to see if packets > are returned on the same interface they've been sent out on or not. Here is an example packet seen on the host: 11:20:40.397067 IP 98.158.139.71.44448 > 98.158.139.66.22: Flags [S], seq= =20 3285763868, win 65535, options [mss 1460,nop,wscale 6,sackOK,TS val=20 3003762262 ecr 0], length 0 The .66 never sees the packet and the host never sees a return packet. O= n=20 the other hand, a connection attempt from .66 to the VM shows up properly= =2E > Proxy arp might play a role on a local network, that's something I've > seen in the past when I has hosts with multiple interfaces on the same > (multiple) networks. If you can afford to try it, I would see if > shutting down eth1 (and then flushing all arp tables on all > hosts/devices involved in your test) makes a difference[0]. I want to be careful about dropping eth1 as it is the only way in if I me= ss=20 up eth0. --=20 D'Arcy J.M. Cain | Democracy is three wolves http://www.druid.net/darcy/ | and a sheep voting on +1 416 788 2246 (DoD#0082) (eNTP) | what's for dinner. IM: darcy@VybeNetworks.com, VoIP: sip:darcy@druid.net Disclaimer: By sending an email to ANY of my addresses you are agreeing that: 1. I am by definition, "the intended recipient". 2. All information in the email is mine to do with as I see fit and make such financial profit, political mileage, or good joke as it lends itself to. In particular, I may quote it where I please. 3. I may take the contents as representing the views of your company if I so wish. 4. This overrides any disclaimer or statement of confidentiality that may be included or implied in your message. --------------447DEE3E4C8ECFE948C40F54-- --X2NYO6ao6VwP3S38HeU0JWult9x6HjAgy-- --MJlay0mUmwnRupFwTS4RHwyQPzxU1qewr Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="OpenPGP_signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="OpenPGP_signature" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- wnsEABYIACMWIQSQJTNYM0vv3aTmBCs/5DDweYZnXQUCX5lWmwUDAAAAAAAKCRA/5DDweYZnXW5k AQC8H3Yd5ErNa38FJxC/ZzNVbhOtHBTx0u0lKxQfDm0aBwD+On5y8SyFuo3MxOjWa6X7xYb7OBpe MREgjYoTb/bVngQ= =cInV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --MJlay0mUmwnRupFwTS4RHwyQPzxU1qewr-- From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Oct 28 14:03:13 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62F74447B55 for ; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 14:03:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounce@track-my-url.com) Received: from srv-52.mkzp.com (srv-52.mkzp.com [37.1.145.52]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CLqzN2HQ2z48vr for ; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 14:03:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounce@track-my-url.com) To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: =?UTF-8?B?TMO8dGZlbiBOb3QgRWRpbml6ISBEw7xueWEgWWF0xLFyxLFtY8SxIEhhZnRhc8SxIC8gMTYtMjEgS2FzxLFtIDIwMjA=?= Message-ID: <3f1639dfd6a563465a777ae858b35740@track-9.track-my-url.com> Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2020 13:47:03 +0000 From: "=?UTF-8?B?VMO8cmtpeWUgU2VybWF5ZSBQaXlhc2FsYXLEsSBCaXJsacSfaQ==?=" Reply-To: info@tspb.org.tr MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer-LID: 469 X-Mailer-RecptId: 2389711 X-Mailer-SID: 5812 X-Mailer-Sent-By: 15 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4CLqzN2HQ2z48vr X-Spamd-Bar: ++++++++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed), No valid DKIM" header.from=tspb.org.tr (policy=none); spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of bounce@track-my-url.com designates 37.1.145.52 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bounce@track-my-url.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [8.04 / 15.00]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[info@tspb.org.tr]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:37.1.145.62/28:c]; REPLYTO_ADDR_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; SUBJECT_HAS_EXCLAIM(0.00)[]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[info@tspb.org.tr,bounce@track-my-url.com]; RCVD_COUNT_ZERO(0.00)[0]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; R_MIXED_CHARSET(3.57)[subject]; ASN(0.00)[asn:50941, ipnet:37.1.145.0/24, country:TR]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[info@tspb.org.tr,bounce@track-my-url.com]; PHISHING(0.89)[dunyayatirimcihaftasi.org.tr->track-my-url.com]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.34)[-0.344]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; HTML_SHORT_LINK_IMG_1(2.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; HAS_PHPMAILER_SIG(0.00)[]; HAS_LIST_UNSUB(-0.01)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; HAS_INTERSPIRE_SIG(1.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.55)[0.554]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.28)[0.277]; GREYLIST(0.00)[pass,body]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-net]; DMARC_POLICY_SOFTFAIL(0.10)[tspb.org.tr : SPF not aligned (relaxed), No valid DKIM, none] X-Spam: Yes Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.33 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2020 14:03:13 -0000 [http://track-9.track-my-url.com/0101L2389711|01015812|011128772|1001T.html] Lütfen Not Ediniz! IOSCO tarafından dördüncüsü düzenlenen "Dünya Yatırımcı Haftası" kutlamaları Ülkemizde bu yıl 16-21 Kasım 2020 tarihlerinde gerçekleştirilecek. Reel Sektör Şirketleri, Bireysel ve Kurumsal Yatırımcılar ile Üniversite Öğrencilerine yönelik 25 farklı oturum ve 100 konuşmacının yer alacağı online etkinliğe katılım ücretsizdir. Kayıt için: www.dunyayatirimcihaftasi.org.tr [http://track-9.track-my-url.com/1001L2389711|10015812|101028772|0001T.html] Bu e-posta tarafınıza TSPB tarafından oluşturulan üye veritabanına kayıtlı olduğunuz için gönderilmiştir. Copyright 2019 Türkiye Sermaye Piyasaları Birliği. Tüm hakları saklıdır. Büyükdere Caddesi No:173 1.Levent Plaza A Blok Kat:4 34394 Levent/İstanbul Click this link to unsubscribe: http://track-9.track-my-url.com/1000U2389711|10019c00fdf926bb981d59ee664f79715a6a|1101469|11005812.html From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Oct 28 14:28:02 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84003447CD4 for ; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 14:28:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@grem.de) Received: from mail.evolve.de (mail.evolve.de [213.239.217.29]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA512 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mail.evolve.de", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CLrX11Gc6z4Bt5 for ; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 14:28:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@grem.de) Received: by mail.evolve.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id cd4423a5; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 14:27:56 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=grem.de; h=content-type :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to :date:cc:message-id:references:to; s=20180501; bh=sm+t9XakZk7bSB vXz2xo8la6QPM=; b=OdJzmnrehCzbPBNnBWZsuCA+8zNIVvwItZt/lQiZJcAcov X3v1rMo4glACmJxbN3jfAlEAxtTVKrdxBclZFG36OrsFgJhkXw2z9t4hatDs2yqu pfaGxucxuygM2AjxqXc8LvXvcnvSeNMa/6nnGJYDyoF5LtFeJbiSyhpA/pOWjBFq PsLR5SQO9bpQB7LGH2WD2bDWt3If39ZUrozYSA7Xl180dkiTfXHmhXzOlQ0ShCWL FiiMyxfY5WtZ6WdoLh08e7CC3DyphU5mFsoD7SQPwYE0GDUiTGUfxfuyT//dDa1U KKXESV42c71IeENG3vjyXotfjcoqrN5mSCPl+SUQ== DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=grem.de; h=content-type :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to :date:cc:message-id:references:to; q=dns; s=20180501; b=sJuPKPYd jSaLSg9NxkjXQXOkq2tSXeh7Q2NhoAV4irRyGN45gLxzxHxbXxtO6IMm5XuD7dJf ASaMuCNBYwSTyxxW1L2LXID9fhqJudhvkUwUIxgdUk6Wd9mz2OOAZKD4oNeNV0Iu lOliCuTmBZtuLRbCY1syK7p4yFn8V7Q5DwNnV11un1Y0xSaDkixHHS8THjjidJsY BGwx2AGsCEdKNs8eD9q/NTb7ayp3PFq2oJP0sfhxjcM65/LmGrX0hA1wHIGDuXsR 9sJzeuhXs5hI7V1unrkZOMBcljjEDsJfG+UPljlx283rNbEGqIe3JHSBVtxZAo2n zcCnYxx5md06HA== Received: by mail.evolve.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id e2f19967 (TLSv1.3:AEAD-CHACHA20-POLY1305-SHA256:256:NO); Wed, 28 Oct 2020 14:27:53 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Subject: Re: Bridge woes From: Michael Gmelin In-Reply-To: <6ca8956a-76d0-8d83-e1ce-015de1fcf2bd@druid.net> Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2020 15:27:52 +0100 Cc: FreeBSD Net Message-Id: References: <6ca8956a-76d0-8d83-e1ce-015de1fcf2bd@druid.net> To: D'Arcy Cain X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (17H35) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4CLrX11Gc6z4Bt5 X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=grem.de header.s=20180501 header.b=OdJzmnre; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of freebsd@grem.de designates 213.239.217.29 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=freebsd@grem.de X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.58 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[grem.de:s=20180501]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:213.239.217.29/32]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[grem.de]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.01)[-1.011]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[grem.de:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.52)[-0.521]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.04)[-1.044]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:213.239.192.0/18, country:DE]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-net] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2020 14:28:02 -0000 > On 28. Oct 2020, at 12:32, D'Arcy Cain wrote: >=20 > =EF=BB=BFOn 10/27/20 2:58 PM, Michael Gmelin wrote: >=20 > I hope you don't mind but I reverted this conversation back to the list in= case it gives someone else any ideas. >=20 >> Hi, >> I tried to reproduce the problem on my home network, but things just >> work as expected. >> I could run VMs with IPs off the local network, fixed ones as well as >> DHCP. >> The topology looks a bit different: >> vm->server->router ->(nat)-> internet >> | >> + dhcp/dns >=20 > I suppose that that is essentially the same but let me see if I get it. Y= ou have a network, say 192.168.1.0/24, behind your NAT router. You have phy= sical servers like 192.168.1.1 and 192.168.1.2 on this network. You then pu= t a VM on the .1 host numbered 192.168.1.3 and it can connect to 192.168.1.= 2. Is that correct? >=20 >> I would speculate that there's either something going on with >> the switch (you might want to take a look at it), or you're experiencing >> some sort of asymmetric routing issue (ping/icmp is usually just fine >=20 > Not sure what that could be. It's not just a problem with external hosts.= Hosts on the same network are also showing the symptoms. Another point is t= hat I can access it inbound. It's only outbound connections that don't work= . >=20 >> with that). Or it might be something with the bge driver (I'm using em >=20 > The only server that it can connect to is running bce. I have some em ser= vers but it doesn't connect to those. >=20 >> here). I assume you already tried disabling all sorts of offloading to >> see if it makes a difference? >=20 > Yep. I tried -tso -lro -rxcsum -rxcsum6 -txcsum -txcsum6 -vlanhwtag -vlan= hwtso and subsets of that. >=20 >> Other than that I would suggest to play with tcpdump to see if packets >> are returned on the same interface they've been sent out on or not. >=20 > Here is an example packet seen on the host: >=20 > 11:20:40.397067 IP 98.158.139.71.44448 > 98.158.139.66.22: Flags [S], seq 3= 285763868, win 65535, options [mss 1460,nop,wscale 6,sackOK,TS val 300376226= 2 ecr 0], length 0 >=20 > The .66 never sees the packet and the host never sees a return packet. On= the other hand, a connection attempt from .66 to the VM shows up properly. >=20 >=20 >> Proxy arp might play a role on a local network, that's something I've >> seen in the past when I has hosts with multiple interfaces on the same >> (multiple) networks. If you can afford to try it, I would see if >> shutting down eth1 (and then flushing all arp tables on all >> hosts/devices involved in your test) makes a difference[0]. >=20 > I want to be careful about dropping eth1 as it is the only way in if I mes= s up eth0. >=20 Can you (afford to) reboot the machine reliably? If so, schedule a reboot us= ing "shutdown -r +10" and then bring down the the interface to see if it mak= es a difference. -m > --=20 > D'Arcy J.M. Cain | Democracy is three wolves > http://www.druid.net/darcy/ | and a sheep voting on > +1 416 788 2246 (DoD#0082) (eNTP) | what's for dinner. > IM: darcy@VybeNetworks.com, VoIP: sip:darcy@druid.net >=20 > Disclaimer: By sending an email to ANY of my addresses you > are agreeing that: >=20 > 1. I am by definition, "the intended recipient". > 2. All information in the email is mine to do with as I see > fit and make such financial profit, political mileage, or > good joke as it lends itself to. In particular, I may quote > it where I please. > 3. I may take the contents as representing the views of > your company if I so wish. > 4. This overrides any disclaimer or statement of > confidentiality that may be included or implied in > your message. From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Oct 28 17:02:10 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1873144B5F9 for ; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 17:02:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CLvxs6yvfz4MCY for ; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 17:02:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id EF1DF44B71B; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 17:02:09 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEE1C44B6C9 for ; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 17:02:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CLvxs61Z0z4Lnh for ; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 17:02:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 99D5B1F88A for ; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 17:02:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 09SH29FT000493 for ; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 17:02:09 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 09SH29d5000492 for net@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 17:02:09 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 248652] iflib: netmap pkt-gen large TX performance difference between 11-STABLE and 12-STABLE/CURRENT on ix & ixl NIC Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2020 17:02:09 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: iflib, needs-qa, performance, regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: sg@efficientip.com X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: vmaffione@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback? mfc-stable12? mfc-stable11- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2020 17:02:10 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D248652 --- Comment #43 from Sylvain Galliano --- I made same tests on vmware + vmxnet NIC + latest patch and I got a panic: spin lock 0xfffff80003079cc0 (turnstile lock) held by 0xfffffe0009607e00 (t= id 100006) too long panic: spin lock held too long cpuid =3D 1 time =3D 1603884508 KDB: stack backtrace: db_trace_self_wrapper() at db_trace_self_wrapper+0x2b/frame 0xfffffe0008480= 680 vpanic() at vpanic+0x182/frame 0xfffffe00084806d0 panic() at panic+0x43/frame 0xfffffe0008480730 _mtx_lock_indefinite_check() at _mtx_lock_indefinite_check+0x64/frame 0xfffffe0008480740 _mtx_lock_spin_cookie() at _mtx_lock_spin_cookie+0xd5/frame 0xfffffe0008480= 7b0 turnstile_trywait() at turnstile_trywait+0xe3/frame 0xfffffe00084807e0 __mtx_lock_sleep() at __mtx_lock_sleep+0x119/frame 0xfffffe0008480870 doselwakeup() at doselwakeup+0x179/frame 0xfffffe00084808c0 nm_os_selwakeup() at nm_os_selwakeup+0x13/frame 0xfffffe00084808e0 netmap_notify() at netmap_notify+0x3d/frame 0xfffffe0008480900 softclock_call_cc() at softclock_call_cc+0x13d/frame 0xfffffe00084809a0 callout_process() at callout_process+0x1c0/frame 0xfffffe0008480a10 handleevents() at handleevents+0x188/frame 0xfffffe0008480a50 timercb() at timercb+0x24e/frame 0xfffffe0008480aa0 lapic_handle_timer() at lapic_handle_timer+0x9b/frame 0xfffffe0008480ad0 Xtimerint() at Xtimerint+0xb1/frame 0xfffffe0008480ad0 --- interrupt, rip =3D 0xffffffff80f5bd46, rsp =3D 0xfffffe0008480ba0, rbp = =3D 0xfffffe0008480ba0 --- acpi_cpu_c1() at acpi_cpu_c1+0x6/frame 0xfffffe0008480ba0 acpi_cpu_idle() at acpi_cpu_idle+0x2eb/frame 0xfffffe0008480bf0 cpu_idle_acpi() at cpu_idle_acpi+0x3e/frame 0xfffffe0008480c10 cpu_idle() at cpu_idle+0x9f/frame 0xfffffe0008480c30 sched_idletd() at sched_idletd+0x2e4/frame 0xfffffe0008480cf0 fork_exit() at fork_exit+0x7e/frame 0xfffffe0008480d30 fork_trampoline() at fork_trampoline+0xe/frame 0xfffffe0008480d30 --- trap 0, rip =3D 0, rsp =3D 0, rbp =3D 0 --- I used the first patch you sent (Draft patch to test the netmap tx timer), = no issue this time. the only major difference I can see between 2 patches (except sysctl) is: + txq->ift_timer.c_cpu =3D cpu; and + txq->ift_netmap_timer.c_cpu =3D cpu; --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Oct 28 17:09:43 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E297544BA22 for ; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 17:09:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from darcy@druid.net) Received: from mail.vex.net (mail.vex.net [98.158.139.68]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CLw6Z68Shz4MP7 for ; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 17:09:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from darcy@druid.net) Received: from imp.druid.net (unknown [38.64.181.54]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: darcy) by mail.vex.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8F3653ED3F; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 13:09:41 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: Bridge woes To: Michael Gmelin Cc: FreeBSD Net References: <6ca8956a-76d0-8d83-e1ce-015de1fcf2bd@druid.net> From: D'Arcy Cain Autocrypt: addr=darcy@druid.net; keydata= xjMEXu32OxYJKwYBBAHaRw8BAQdAD839OEQVMqCs45KVwLKg4srvl51WsVhMpTGOd9z3Ym3N HUQnQXJjeSBDYWluIDxkYXJjeUBkcnVpZC5uZXQ+wpYEExYIAD4WIQSQJTNYM0vv3aTmBCs/ 5DDweYZnXQUCXu32OwIbAwUJCWYBgAULCQgHAgYVCgkICwIEFgIDAQIeAQIXgAAKCRA/5DDw eYZnXWAxAP9cDL1j4koUFRBNQyC4iMp/cx5KnozmtsFtiTrWdZBrIwD6A2rLFx60tJryd/qp SZpXk7UPDLH/PY1hstjx9WUbXQjOOARe7fY7EgorBgEEAZdVAQUBAQdAbK0SOaTRrkI2QAWz rCz29D2RDOgGTvEbDpyWiyA5RhQDAQgHwn4EGBYIACYWIQSQJTNYM0vv3aTmBCs/5DDweYZn XQUCXu32OwIbDAUJCWYBgAAKCRA/5DDweYZnXaNOAQDC77ymNjoMZQVgDCcmgZEk6IZxn45k nyW17OYCpRctvgD9Fg3aocAbHK7V9AhmSbDPxLNQygQUPjjU7Cyn97b1cQs= Message-ID: <6c0755b9-72d7-59ab-32ac-69eb2f560153@druid.net> Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2020 13:09:40 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ZFQfNZU1kxwc2V6TwyWaOyl364za7Nog7" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4CLw6Z68Shz4MP7 X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of darcy@druid.net has no SPF policy when checking 98.158.139.68) smtp.mailfrom=darcy@druid.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.10 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.85)[-0.849]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.005]; MIME_GOOD(-0.20)[multipart/signed,multipart/mixed,text/plain,application/pgp-keys]; HAS_ATTACHMENT(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[druid.net]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.15)[-0.146]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; SIGNED_PGP(-2.00)[]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; RCVD_NO_TLS_LAST(0.10)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:+,3:+,4:+,5:~]; ASN(0.00)[asn:19842, ipnet:98.158.139.0/24, country:CA]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-net] X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.33 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2020 17:09:43 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --ZFQfNZU1kxwc2V6TwyWaOyl364za7Nog7 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="iVETb9M84uFk5HC5L3InMsWWxQdUZ7C3b"; protected-headers="v1" From: D'Arcy Cain To: Michael Gmelin Cc: FreeBSD Net Message-ID: <6c0755b9-72d7-59ab-32ac-69eb2f560153@druid.net> Subject: Re: Bridge woes References: <6ca8956a-76d0-8d83-e1ce-015de1fcf2bd@druid.net> In-Reply-To: --iVETb9M84uFk5HC5L3InMsWWxQdUZ7C3b Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------080A3E26C8FD6F7964FF2B71" Content-Language: en-US This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------080A3E26C8FD6F7964FF2B71 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 10/28/20 10:27 AM, Michael Gmelin wrote: > Can you (afford to) reboot the machine reliably? If so, schedule a rebo= ot using "shutdown -r +10" and then bring down the the interface to see i= f it makes a difference. Nope. No difference. --=20 D'Arcy J.M. Cain | Democracy is three wolves http://www.druid.net/darcy/ | and a sheep voting on +1 416 788 2246 (DoD#0082) (eNTP) | what's for dinner. IM: darcy@VybeNetworks.com, VoIP: sip:darcy@druid.net Disclaimer: By sending an email to ANY of my addresses you are agreeing that: 1. I am by definition, "the intended recipient". 2. All information in the email is mine to do with as I see fit and make such financial profit, political mileage, or good joke as it lends itself to. In particular, I may quote it where I please. 3. I may take the contents as representing the views of your company if I so wish. 4. This overrides any disclaimer or statement of confidentiality that may be included or implied in your message. --------------080A3E26C8FD6F7964FF2B71-- --iVETb9M84uFk5HC5L3InMsWWxQdUZ7C3b-- --ZFQfNZU1kxwc2V6TwyWaOyl364za7Nog7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="OpenPGP_signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="OpenPGP_signature" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- wnsEABYIACMWIQSQJTNYM0vv3aTmBCs/5DDweYZnXQUCX5ml1AUDAAAAAAAKCRA/5DDweYZnXZk9 AP9yXFJ/xNAUyJlaroRsK2U0Yk5lKQ1qmIYGok7uibuqfgD+JVRjDGqa5zmRzjWsYAm8YeW1ru/X OfC9sgjAeEJH9gM= =aNVW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ZFQfNZU1kxwc2V6TwyWaOyl364za7Nog7-- From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Oct 28 18:01:00 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D00C44C9A6 for ; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 18:01:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@grem.de) Received: from mail.evolve.de (mail.evolve.de [213.239.217.29]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA512 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mail.evolve.de", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CLxFl05Gzz4Pj6 for ; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 18:00:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@grem.de) Received: by mail.evolve.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id eddf8176; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 18:00:56 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=grem.de; h=content-type :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to :date:cc:message-id:references:to; s=20180501; bh=W6IWubr9HUsRTy 8+arVjE6sodWg=; b=l8Xntl88pkVzfnzhqxL8ewUEVk9OvXjU+nR6azreYTAGtv K0CgL+Z7vHmkjW1VjPCy8bvFZ9hVNEubRM967LpD2XIYGxHqZOxrPaO6Wb/HH05H 2252K4+7/oxIYsqSdwjsCpLCmmYcUqkBTunkT4YghCWqjfm+Vp00Tp5ZUvT+aY8V 26rllCIj9VgOGYfV1FYgK2xagWVDJrmJIv3Vne57JPWAGSUY28U/Hph6IxOJ+r0R K+QZ3JzhXllKL2qL3VfR6Ty2ZLjcPD1jI0YvRwxUegks6ArGv1V1oQwsqo4jjhlD Z2rYBQ9HTbJjIh+9G2Zy0DydQfv9X7mipb1GBJqg== DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=grem.de; h=content-type :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to :date:cc:message-id:references:to; q=dns; s=20180501; b=eYypckQ5 qoRj0MKKKtoHouWzXq9b41fISeXJ9d2wsXWLigp634RGSZhvW1gorqw0AvEf0P0l fIU5bUt9ZgbCxVZeyoNm5TKPGy4ZRyGZvoPNLysm2suISWzW0vJaAzrwTqxp4NR0 yjhbOWC/8jH41JyYQs8Y64tnoJBhbJbv4RHhArFrwvKdRXMdAKWNz+cuMzFUZHQk 33m+AOWu/5th5XY+jWYzy0f8KGpNrRjFKtTpJ+L3uFkLu9jscWWDv4D673M8qLDc +fVQy0rFWKrf61FSSEZ6eb5+HwmmYrHVHu/P1tVNkQE1HyAFH3+Pq+SINpK6Os+j QNAjzmPspD4/5A== Received: by mail.evolve.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 4445b5b4 (TLSv1.3:AEAD-CHACHA20-POLY1305-SHA256:256:NO); Wed, 28 Oct 2020 18:00:55 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Subject: Re: Bridge woes From: Michael Gmelin In-Reply-To: <6c0755b9-72d7-59ab-32ac-69eb2f560153@druid.net> Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2020 19:00:54 +0100 Cc: FreeBSD Net Message-Id: References: <6c0755b9-72d7-59ab-32ac-69eb2f560153@druid.net> To: D'Arcy Cain X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (17H35) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4CLxFl05Gzz4Pj6 X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=grem.de header.s=20180501 header.b=l8Xntl88; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of freebsd@grem.de designates 213.239.217.29 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=freebsd@grem.de X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.99 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[grem.de:s=20180501]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:213.239.217.29/32]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[grem.de]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.01)[-1.014]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[grem.de:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.93)[-0.927]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.05)[-1.049]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:213.239.192.0/18, country:DE]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-net] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2020 18:01:00 -0000 > On 28. Oct 2020, at 18:10, D'Arcy Cain wrote: >=20 > =EF=BB=BFOn 10/28/20 10:27 AM, Michael Gmelin wrote: >> Can you (afford to) reboot the machine reliably? If so, schedule a reboot= using "shutdown -r +10" and then bring down the the interface to see if it m= akes a difference. >=20 > Nope. No difference. Did you flush caches on all equipment? In general, I would take a look at sw= itches etc., but without being able to navigate the environment, it=E2=80=99= s all speculation, maybe someone else can help you. -m >=20 > --=20 > D'Arcy J.M. Cain | Democracy is three wolves > http://www.druid.net/darcy/ | and a sheep voting on > +1 416 788 2246 (DoD#0082) (eNTP) | what's for dinner. > IM: darcy@VybeNetworks.com, VoIP: sip:darcy@druid.net >=20 > Disclaimer: By sending an email to ANY of my addresses you > are agreeing that: >=20 > 1. I am by definition, "the intended recipient". > 2. All information in the email is mine to do with as I see > fit and make such financial profit, political mileage, or > good joke as it lends itself to. In particular, I may quote > it where I please. > 3. I may take the contents as representing the views of > your company if I so wish. > 4. This overrides any disclaimer or statement of > confidentiality that may be included or implied in > your message. From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Oct 28 18:34:41 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7837344D74D for ; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 18:34:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from max@m00nbsd.net) Received: from 2.mo52.mail-out.ovh.net (2.mo52.mail-out.ovh.net [178.33.105.233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CLy0c5Mplz4Rh8 for ; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 18:34:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from max@m00nbsd.net) Received: from mxplan6.mail.ovh.net (unknown [10.108.4.92]) by mo52.mail-out.ovh.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5732F200F7A for ; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 19:34:38 +0100 (CET) Received: from m00nbsd.net (37.59.142.106) by DAG3EX2.mxp6.local (172.16.2.22) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2044.4; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 19:34:37 +0100 From: Maxime Villard Subject: remote use-after-free in icmp6 To: Message-ID: <0d6f3bc8-d727-892b-be8e-947c9dfddc24@m00nbsd.net> Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2020 19:34:34 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [37.59.142.106] X-ClientProxiedBy: DAG7EX2.mxp6.local (172.16.2.62) To DAG3EX2.mxp6.local (172.16.2.22) X-Ovh-Tracer-GUID: 7d2b91e1-77e0-4ef4-9eb5-f2febeef2abf X-Ovh-Tracer-Id: 13383853669348675351 X-VR-SPAMSTATE: OK X-VR-SPAMSCORE: 0 X-VR-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedujedrledugdduuddvucetufdoteggodetrfdotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuqfggjfdpvefjgfevmfevgfenuceurghilhhouhhtmecuhedttdenucenucfjughrpefhuffvkfffgggtgfhisehtjeertddttdejnecuhfhrohhmpeforgigihhmvgcugghilhhlrghrugcuoehmrgigsehmtddtnhgsshgurdhnvghtqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeejtedvtdevgeevuddtheevgeduudeufffhfedtkeffkedtvdduueefiedufedvvdenucfkpheptddrtddrtddrtddpfeejrdehledrudegvddruddtieenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhhouggvpehsmhhtphdqohhuthdphhgvlhhopehmgihplhgrnheirdhmrghilhdrohhvhhdrnhgvthdpihhnvghtpedtrddtrddtrddtpdhmrghilhhfrhhomhepmhgrgiesmhdttdhnsghsugdrnhgvthdprhgtphhtthhopehfrhgvvggsshguqdhnvghtsehfrhgvvggsshgurdhorhhg X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4CLy0c5Mplz4Rh8 X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of max@m00nbsd.net designates 178.33.105.233 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=max@m00nbsd.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.76 / 15.00]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; HAS_XOIP(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_GOOD(0.00)[178.33.105.233:from]; FREEFALL_USER(0.00)[max]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-net@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.02)[-1.019]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[m00nbsd.net]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ptr:mail-out.ovh.net]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.43)[-0.433]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[178.33.105.233:from]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.01)[-1.006]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:16276, ipnet:178.32.0.0/15, country:FR]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-net] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2020 18:34:41 -0000 In icmp6_notify_error(), 'finaldst' points to data within an mbuf, but when iterating over the next IPv6 options the kernel can free that mbuf, meaning the dereferences of 'finaldst' hit a freed buffer. Note that this is triggerable without specific conditions, over just ICMPv6. Maxime From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Oct 28 20:25:30 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4C2044FA02 for ; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 20:25:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from melifaro@ipfw.ru) Received: from forward500j.mail.yandex.net (forward500j.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:801:2::110]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CM0ST3lntz4XkL for ; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 20:25:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from melifaro@ipfw.ru) Received: from mxback24g.mail.yandex.net (mxback24g.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:1472:2741:0:8b7:324]) by forward500j.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 606DB11C157C; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 23:25:25 +0300 (MSK) Received: from localhost (localhost [::1]) by mxback24g.mail.yandex.net (mxback/Yandex) with ESMTP id P9bJFHlIlE-POHShrps; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 23:25:24 +0300 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ipfw.ru; s=mail; t=1603916724; bh=I68Ff5flwGxultVGKKuwR7cRW9cgL19GSQtsNpH3LrA=; h=References:Date:Message-Id:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From; b=K6bxLWOqG9zjD0fvO+wDlxYsJQmz6JGduddEJOcaS/oC2jG5+1DjA9oirUpKIYegH u9kXkrs9Ijr5T8R4WsK2jE0zBaiWhjwGdtAvdetlI+f5xBLHdvp3Pl/ojglCEFlZBW LQM9Ky3qpIw5puGFAk/OsQaJO0lz59D9Mvu7I2Q8= Received: by sas2-6d8463dc3f95.qloud-c.yandex.net with HTTP; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 23:25:24 +0300 From: Alexander V. Chernikov To: Maxime Villard , "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" In-Reply-To: <0d6f3bc8-d727-892b-be8e-947c9dfddc24@m00nbsd.net> References: <0d6f3bc8-d727-892b-be8e-947c9dfddc24@m00nbsd.net> Subject: Re: remote use-after-free in icmp6 X-Mailer: Yamail [ http://yandex.ru ] 5.0 Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2020 20:25:24 +0000 Message-Id: <5142321603916685@mail.yandex.ru> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4CM0ST3lntz4XkL X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=ipfw.ru header.s=mail header.b=K6bxLWOq; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of melifaro@ipfw.ru designates 2a02:6b8:0:801:2::110 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=melifaro@ipfw.ru X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.60 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_SOME(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[ipfw.ru:s=mail]; FREEFALL_USER(0.00)[melifaro]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a02:6b8:0::/52:c]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.02)[-1.016]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[ipfw.ru]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.07)[-1.071]; MIME_BASE64_TEXT_BOGUS(1.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[ipfw.ru:+]; MIME_BASE64_TEXT(0.10)[]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.31)[-0.310]; MIME_HTML_ONLY(0.20)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:~]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:13238, ipnet:2a02:6b8::/32, country:RU]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-net]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[2a02:6b8:0:801:2::110:from] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.33 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2020 20:25:30 -0000 From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Oct 28 20:27:25 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D68244F83D for ; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 20:27:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from melifaro@ipfw.ru) Received: from forward501o.mail.yandex.net (forward501o.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:1a2d::611]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CM0Vh5b3Fz4Xkx for ; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 20:27:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from melifaro@ipfw.ru) Received: from mxback10j.mail.yandex.net (mxback10j.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:1619::113]) by forward501o.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 0F9971E801BD; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 23:27:23 +0300 (MSK) Received: from localhost (localhost [::1]) by mxback10j.mail.yandex.net (mxback/Yandex) with ESMTP id KIV89y2hCq-RMZCHk7E; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 23:27:22 +0300 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ipfw.ru; s=mail; t=1603916842; bh=zsHLVdbUMh/j21hkrRX+5WzyitrJudFNWOiWCeIcsdU=; h=References:Date:Message-Id:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From; b=FOcohC1v0IwG2TkrRvfIhrOSRX8ZhAQQcFGYrazvp4l1AleQo8aRY0MKX8Zi8QOvr iY+G3SBBE+VEf1rDPscCaZ0kbvyPEq2fGINYfE4qUKseaD5Aw2FtERPpeUpy9Eewlq mjnqCPOe/ne0ZjsQkiLGqbVDoQ49mKw0KngJA8pA= Received: by sas1-229a7e5e75ed.qloud-c.yandex.net with HTTP; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 23:27:22 +0300 From: Alexander V. Chernikov To: Maxime Villard , "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" In-Reply-To: <5142321603916685@mail.yandex.ru> References: <0d6f3bc8-d727-892b-be8e-947c9dfddc24@m00nbsd.net> <5142321603916685@mail.yandex.ru> Subject: Re: remote use-after-free in icmp6 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Yamail [ http://yandex.ru ] 5.0 Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2020 20:27:22 +0000 Message-Id: <3581301603916797@mail.yandex.ru> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4CM0Vh5b3Fz4Xkx X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=ipfw.ru header.s=mail header.b=FOcohC1v; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of melifaro@ipfw.ru designates 2a02:6b8:0:1a2d::611 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=melifaro@ipfw.ru X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.11 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_SOME(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[ipfw.ru:s=mail]; FREEFALL_USER(0.00)[melifaro]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a02:6b8:0:1000::/52:c]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.99)[-0.994]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[ipfw.ru]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.06)[-1.060]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[ipfw.ru:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.56)[-0.562]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:13238, ipnet:2a02:6b8::/32, country:RU]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-net] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2020 20:27:25 -0000 28.10.2020, 20:25, "Alexander V. Chernikov" : > 28.10.2020, 18:34, "Maxime Villard" : >> In icmp6_notify_error(), 'finaldst' points to data within an mbuf, but when >> iterating over the next IPv6 options the kernel can free that mbuf, meaning >> the dereferences of 'finaldst' hit a freed buffer. [sorry for reposting, plaintext this time] > Fixed in r367114, thanks for reporting! >> Note that this is triggerable without specific conditions, over just ICMPv6. >> >> Maxime >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list >> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Oct 28 20:50:43 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 114F944FBEE for ; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 20:50:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CM11Z6rZqz4Ytb for ; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 20:50:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id E948044FBED; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 20:50:42 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E911C44FBEC for ; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 20:50:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CM11Z60xXz4YTY for ; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 20:50:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B342321A73 for ; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 20:50:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 09SKogmo056117 for ; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 20:50:42 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 09SKogBv056116 for net@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 20:50:42 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 248652] iflib: netmap pkt-gen large TX performance difference between 11-STABLE and 12-STABLE/CURRENT on ix & ixl NIC Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2020 20:50:39 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: iflib, needs-qa, performance, regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: vmaffione@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: vmaffione@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback? mfc-stable12? mfc-stable11- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: attachments.isobsolete attachments.created Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2020 20:50:43 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D248652 Vincenzo Maffione changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #219121|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #44 from Vincenzo Maffione --- Created attachment 219179 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D219179&action= =3Dedit Cleaned up netmap tx timer (bugfixes) --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Oct 28 20:51:23 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDD5E450112 for ; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 20:51:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brianna@etargetsmail.com) Received: from vn.etargetsmail.com (vn.etargetsmail.com [164.90.180.226]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CM12L287sz4Z5d for ; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 20:51:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brianna@etargetsmail.com) From: "Brianna Noren" To: Subject: EdTech decision makers Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2020 02:11:16 +0530 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0 Thread-Index: AdatNeB/wdDhdazdTsuFr4MgeoLvsA== Content-Language: en-in X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4CM12L287sz4Z5d X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of brianna@etargetsmail.com designates 164.90.180.226 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=brianna@etargetsmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.17 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.89)[-0.885]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:164.90.180.226]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[etargetsmail.com]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.93)[-0.932]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.05)[-0.053]; RCVD_COUNT_ZERO(0.00)[0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; ASN(0.00)[asn:14061, ipnet:164.90.176.0/20, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-net] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.33 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2020 20:51:23 -0000 Hi Hope you are doing well. Would you like to connect with EdTech decision makers from Schools and Universities? List includes: Principal, Dean, Technology Director, Education Program Director, School Technology Coordinator, Superintendent, Chief Information Officer, Chief Technology Officer We cover: . Charter Schools . Special education school . Colleges and Universities Please let me know if you are interested and I will get back to you with a couple of sample contacts. Looking forward to hearing from you. Best Regards, Brianna Noren | Marketing Specialist If you don't wish to receive our newsletters, reply back with "UN-SUBDSCRIBE" in subject line. From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Oct 28 20:55:26 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1535644FCF6 for ; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 20:55:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CM1716vRsz4ZFj for ; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 20:55:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id ECB3E44FC7A; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 20:55:25 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC7704501D0 for ; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 20:55:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CM17164P9z4ZLF for ; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 20:55:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A98F821DEC for ; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 20:55:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 09SKtPcE061722 for ; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 20:55:25 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 09SKtPGD061721 for net@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 20:55:25 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 248652] iflib: netmap pkt-gen large TX performance difference between 11-STABLE and 12-STABLE/CURRENT on ix & ixl NIC Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2020 20:55:25 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: iflib, needs-qa, performance, regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: vmaffione@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: vmaffione@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback? mfc-stable12? mfc-stable11- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2020 20:55:26 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D248652 --- Comment #45 from Vincenzo Maffione --- (In reply to Sylvain Galliano from comment #43) Ugh. Thanks for reporting. I indeed introduced a subtle typo bug, using callout_reset_sbt() rather than callout_reset_sbt_on() (as intended). Therefore I was passing the "cpu" val= ue to the "flags" argument, resulting in a disaster. In your test this probably triggered the C_DIRECT_EXEC flag of callout(9), so that the timer was being executed in hardware interrupt context. I uploaded the patch that is now consistent with the src tree (that I'm goi= ng to fix right away). --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Oct 28 21:06:38 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C19024505E9 for ; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 21:06:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CM1My2Vbzz4ZxR for ; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 21:06:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 540DF45081A; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 21:06:38 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53D6845088A for ; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 21:06:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CM1My1Y76z4b4n for ; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 21:06:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 19C02223E4 for ; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 21:06:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 09SL6bqr074712 for ; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 21:06:37 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from bugzilla@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 09SL6b26074711 for net@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 21:06:37 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: bugzilla set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 248652] iflib: netmap pkt-gen large TX performance difference between 11-STABLE and 12-STABLE/CURRENT on ix & ixl NIC Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2020 21:06:36 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: iflib, needs-qa, performance, regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: commit-hook@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: vmaffione@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback? mfc-stable12? mfc-stable11- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2020 21:06:38 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D248652 --- Comment #46 from commit-hook@FreeBSD.org --- A commit references this bug: Author: vmaffione Date: Wed Oct 28 21:06:18 UTC 2020 New revision: 367117 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/367117 Log: iflib: fix typo bug introduced by r367093 Code was supposed to call callout_reset_sbt_on() rather than callout_reset_sbt(). This resulted into passing a "cpu" value to a "flag" argument. A recipe for subtle errors. PR: 248652 Reported by: sg@efficientip.com MFC with: r367093 Changes: head/sys/net/iflib.c --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu Oct 29 07:07:35 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79681442CD6 for ; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 07:07:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CMGjM028bz4GnN for ; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 07:07:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id E7CE64430BC; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 07:07:34 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E01F6442D71 for ; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 07:07:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CMGjL27b5z4GgX for ; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 07:07:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 268252994A for ; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 07:07:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 09T77YtK076787 for ; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 07:07:34 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 09T77YLc076785 for net@FreeBSD.org; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 07:07:34 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 247647] if_vmx(4): Page fault when opening netmap port (IFLIB/DMA) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2020 07:07:33 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.1-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: crash X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: zlei.huang@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: vmaffione@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback+ mfc-stable12+ mfc-stable11- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2020 07:07:35 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D247647 Zhenlei Huang changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|In Progress |Closed Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #27 from Zhenlei Huang --- Repeating on FreeBSD 12.2-RELEASE, this bug can not be reproduced. Close as fixed. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu Oct 29 08:11:16 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 611834457D3 for ; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 08:11:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CMJ6r1ywRz4LsJ for ; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 08:11:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 436B344582F; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 08:11:16 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4330344547F for ; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 08:11:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CMJ6r15ttz4LvZ for ; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 08:11:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0AE822A722 for ; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 08:11:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 09T8BF26051001 for ; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 08:11:15 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 09T8BFRJ051000 for net@FreeBSD.org; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 08:11:15 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 247912] IPv6 ndp does not work across local bridge members Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2020 08:11:15 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.1-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ipv6 X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: lwhsu@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status keywords cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2020 08:11:16 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D247912 Li-Wen Hsu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|New |Open Keywords| |ipv6 CC| |lwhsu@FreeBSD.org --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu Oct 29 08:15:23 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 346A6445DA8 for ; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 08:15:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CMJCb0jy9z4M8M for ; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 08:15:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 18AC4445FA6; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 08:15:23 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18738445EC3 for ; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 08:15:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CMJCZ70hSz4M66 for ; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 08:15:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D42352A376 for ; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 08:15:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 09T8FMNV055418 for ; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 08:15:22 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 09T8FMpl055417 for net@FreeBSD.org; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 08:15:22 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 247912] IPv6 ndp does not work across local bridge members Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2020 08:15:22 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.1-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ipv6 X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: pmh@hausen.com X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2020 08:15:23 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D247912 Patrick M. Hausen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pmh@hausen.com --- Comment #3 from Patrick M. Hausen --- Isn't the IP configuration (both v4 and v6) supposed to go on the bridge interface instead of em0? There should be a message upon inserting em0 as a member: "IPv6 addresses on em0 have been removed before adding it as a member to prevent IPv6 address scope violation." --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu Oct 29 11:02:34 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 558A844B973 for ; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 11:02:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from darcy@druid.net) Received: from mail.vex.net (mail.vex.net [98.158.139.68]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CMMwT6BYtz4Y0L for ; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 11:02:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from darcy@druid.net) Received: from imp.druid.net (unknown [38.64.181.54]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: darcy) by mail.vex.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 789044023D for ; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 07:02:02 -0400 (EDT) To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org References: From: D'Arcy Cain Autocrypt: addr=darcy@druid.net; keydata= xjMEXu32OxYJKwYBBAHaRw8BAQdAD839OEQVMqCs45KVwLKg4srvl51WsVhMpTGOd9z3Ym3N HUQnQXJjeSBDYWluIDxkYXJjeUBkcnVpZC5uZXQ+wpYEExYIAD4WIQSQJTNYM0vv3aTmBCs/ 5DDweYZnXQUCXu32OwIbAwUJCWYBgAULCQgHAgYVCgkICwIEFgIDAQIeAQIXgAAKCRA/5DDw eYZnXWAxAP9cDL1j4koUFRBNQyC4iMp/cx5KnozmtsFtiTrWdZBrIwD6A2rLFx60tJryd/qp SZpXk7UPDLH/PY1hstjx9WUbXQjOOARe7fY7EgorBgEEAZdVAQUBAQdAbK0SOaTRrkI2QAWz rCz29D2RDOgGTvEbDpyWiyA5RhQDAQgHwn4EGBYIACYWIQSQJTNYM0vv3aTmBCs/5DDweYZn XQUCXu32OwIbDAUJCWYBgAAKCRA/5DDweYZnXaNOAQDC77ymNjoMZQVgDCcmgZEk6IZxn45k nyW17OYCpRctvgD9Fg3aocAbHK7V9AhmSbDPxLNQygQUPjjU7Cyn97b1cQs= Subject: Network woes Message-ID: <4598d9be-4be8-9b54-9128-d840c8283f73@druid.net> Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2020 07:02:01 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="krnHktJ64e7ZyFuZa6XbbC10ix0eHMO1Q" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4CMMwT6BYtz4Y0L X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of darcy@druid.net has no SPF policy when checking 98.158.139.68) smtp.mailfrom=darcy@druid.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.02 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.91)[-0.906]; HAS_ATTACHMENT(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.20)[multipart/signed,multipart/mixed,text/plain,application/pgp-keys]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-net@freebsd.org]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.89)[0.891]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[druid.net]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.90)[-0.901]; SIGNED_PGP(-2.00)[]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; RCVD_NO_TLS_LAST(0.10)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:+,3:+,4:+,5:~]; ASN(0.00)[asn:19842, ipnet:98.158.139.0/24, country:CA]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-net] X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.33 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2020 11:02:34 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --krnHktJ64e7ZyFuZa6XbbC10ix0eHMO1Q Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="gdYkeuhfP48xuX6g6PEuxrOn3BymUjtwi"; protected-headers="v1" From: D'Arcy Cain To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Message-ID: <4598d9be-4be8-9b54-9128-d840c8283f73@druid.net> Subject: Network woes References: In-Reply-To: --gdYkeuhfP48xuX6g6PEuxrOn3BymUjtwi Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------62E6E453749F568BC4716551" Content-Language: en-US This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------62E6E453749F568BC4716551 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable NOTE: Was "Bridge woes" On 10/25/20 1:32 PM, D'Arcy Cain wrote: > I have been trying to solve this problem for a week now.=C2=A0 I have b= een=20 > emailing the virtualization list (Re: When is a switch not a switch?)=20 > because it had to do with vm-bhyve but now I am wondering if it is some= thing=20 > else.=C2=A0 Maybe some of the network experts here can help. Turns out it has nothing to do with virtualization. It never occurred to= me=20 to test that the host could access the Internet since I had no problem=20 connecting and logging in. However, everything I described for the VM=20 applies to the host as well. Here is my current setup. In rc.conf I have this: hostname=3D"vm01.vex.net" me=3D41 # last octet of IP in hex I then include a common rc.conf that includes this: set -- $(/sbin/ifconfig -l ether); eth0=3D$1 eth1=3D$2 eval "ifconfig_${eth0}_name=3D\"eth0\"" eval "ifconfig_${eth1}_name=3D\"eth1\"" ifconfig_eth0=3D"inet 0x629e8b${me}/27 up" ifconfig_eth1=3D"inet 0xc0a897${me}/24 up" ifconfig_eth0_ipv6=3D"inet6 2605:2600:1001::${me}/64 up" ifconfig_eth1_ipv6=3D"inet6 fc00:97:97::${me}/64 up" defaultrouter=3D"98.158.139.94" ipv6_defaultrouter=3D2605:2600:1001::1 So I can now connect, by IP address, to 98.158.139.77 but to no other ser= ver=20 on my network. They all have no trouble connecting to this host. No oth= er=20 server in my network has this problem. Here is eth0 which started out as bge0: bge0: mem=20 0x92b90000-0x92b9ffff,0x92ba0000-0x92baffff,0x92bb0000-0x92bbffff at device 0.0 numa-domain 0 on pci15 bge0: APE FW version: NCSI v1.3.7.0 bge0: CHIP ID 0x05719001; ASIC REV 0x5719; CHIP REV 0x57190; PCI-E eth0: flags=3D8843 metric 0 mtu 1= 500 options=3D80088 ether 14:02:ec:31:60:d0 inet 98.158.139.65 netmask 0xffffffe0 broadcast 98.158.139.95 inet6 fe80::1602:ecff:fe31:60d0%eth0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1 inet6 2605:2600:1001::41 prefixlen 64 media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT ) status: active nd6 options=3D21 And here is one that works fine: bge0: =20 mem 0xdfdf0000-0xdfdfffff irq 16 at device 0.0 on pci4 bge0: CHIP ID 0x00004201; ASIC REV 0x04; CHIP REV 0x42; PCI-E eth0: flags=3D8843 metric 0 mtu 1= 500 options=3D8009b ether 00:21:9b:fc:d4:8b inet 98.158.139.92 netmask 0xffffffe0 broadcast 98.158.139.95 inet6 fe80::221:9bff:fefc:d48b%eth0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1 inet6 2605:2600:1001::5c prefixlen 64 media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) status: active nd6 options=3D21 Surprisingly, although I have other HPs, this is the only one that has a = network card labelled HP. Could it be that HP needs something special = in=20 the network setup? =20 =20 --=20 D'Arcy J.M. Cain | Democracy is three wolves http://www.druid.net/darcy/ | and a sheep voting on +1 416 788 2246 (DoD#0082) (eNTP) | what's for dinner. IM: darcy@VybeNetworks.com, VoIP: sip:darcy@druid.net Disclaimer: By sending an email to ANY of my addresses you are agreeing that: 1. I am by definition, "the intended recipient". 2. All information in the email is mine to do with as I see fit and make such financial profit, political mileage, or good joke as it lends itself to. In particular, I may quote it where I please. 3. I may take the contents as representing the views of your company if I so wish. 4. This overrides any disclaimer or statement of confidentiality that may be included or implied in your message. --------------62E6E453749F568BC4716551-- --gdYkeuhfP48xuX6g6PEuxrOn3BymUjtwi-- --krnHktJ64e7ZyFuZa6XbbC10ix0eHMO1Q Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="OpenPGP_signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="OpenPGP_signature" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- wnoEABYIACMWIQSQJTNYM0vv3aTmBCs/5DDweYZnXQUCX5qhKQUDAAAAAAAKCRA/5DDweYZnXZYT APUXVj+yiZS1Kmpx0J/SSlpwoGfUuY9SAtakdZfS+FEDAQCHjOucrNwjY3SBMg5k6k76l7KSTbsl F8KcreU6oPthDA== =p/A/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --krnHktJ64e7ZyFuZa6XbbC10ix0eHMO1Q-- From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu Oct 29 11:41:50 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CD3944D1BE for ; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 11:41:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sthaug@nethelp.no) Received: from bizet.nethelp.no (bizet.nethelp.no [195.1.209.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CMNnn5QqVz4bw2 for ; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 11:41:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sthaug@nethelp.no) Received: from localhost (bizet.nethelp.no [IPv6:2001:8c0:9e04:500::1]) by bizet.nethelp.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id E97E4E6047; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 12:41:45 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2020 12:41:45 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: <20201029.124145.323050090.sthaug@nethelp.no> To: darcy@druid.net Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Network woes,Network woes From: sthaug@nethelp.no In-Reply-To: <4598d9be-4be8-9b54-9128-d840c8283f73@druid.net> References: <4598d9be-4be8-9b54-9128-d840c8283f73@druid.net> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.7 on Emacs 26 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4CMNnn5QqVz4bw2 X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of sthaug@nethelp.no designates 195.1.209.33 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=sthaug@nethelp.no X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.66 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.97)[-0.972]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_GOOD(0.00)[195.1.209.33:from]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[nethelp.no]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.97)[-0.972]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED(-0.20)[195.1.209.33:from]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; FROM_NO_DN(0.00)[]; MID_CONTAINS_FROM(1.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.82)[-0.820]; RCVD_NO_TLS_LAST(0.10)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:2116, ipnet:195.1.0.0/16, country:NO]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-net] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2020 11:41:50 -0000 > Here is eth0 which started out as bge0: > bge0: mem > 0x92b90000-0x92b9ffff,0x92ba0000-0x92baffff,0x92bb0000-0x92bbffff > at device 0.0 numa-domain 0 on pci15 > bge0: APE FW version: NCSI v1.3.7.0 > bge0: CHIP ID 0x05719001; ASIC REV 0x5719; CHIP REV 0x57190; PCI-E ... > Surprisingly, although I have other HPs, this is the only one that has > a network card labelled HP. Could it be that HP needs something > special in the network setup? Here is a ProLiant DL360 Gen9 server with the same type of Ethernet card: % grep 'HP Ethernet' /var/run/dmesg.boot bge0: mem 0x92b90000-0x92b9ffff,0x92ba0000-0x92baffff,0x92bb0000-0x92bbffff irq 16 at device 0.0 numa-domain 0 on pci14 bge1: mem 0x92b60000-0x92b6ffff,0x92b70000-0x92b7ffff,0x92b80000-0x92b8ffff irq 17 at device 0.1 numa-domain 0 on pci14 bge2: mem 0x92b30000-0x92b3ffff,0x92b40000-0x92b4ffff,0x92b50000-0x92b5ffff irq 16 at device 0.2 numa-domain 0 on pci14 bge3: mem 0x92b00000-0x92b0ffff,0x92b10000-0x92b1ffff,0x92b20000-0x92b2ffff irq 17 at device 0.3 numa-domain 0 on pci14 No special network setup needed, it just works - currently running 12.1-STABLE. Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug@nethelp.no From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu Oct 29 14:53:28 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CD5E453D81 for ; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 14:53:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from darcy@druid.net) Received: from mail.vex.net (mail.vex.net [98.158.139.68]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CMT2v4lB1z3bmy for ; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 14:53:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from darcy@druid.net) Received: from imp.druid.net (unknown [38.64.181.54]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: darcy) by mail.vex.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 231BF40824; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 10:52:50 -0400 (EDT) To: sthaug@nethelp.no Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org References: <4598d9be-4be8-9b54-9128-d840c8283f73@druid.net> <20201029.124145.323050090.sthaug@nethelp.no> From: D'Arcy Cain Autocrypt: addr=darcy@druid.net; keydata= xjMEXu32OxYJKwYBBAHaRw8BAQdAD839OEQVMqCs45KVwLKg4srvl51WsVhMpTGOd9z3Ym3N HUQnQXJjeSBDYWluIDxkYXJjeUBkcnVpZC5uZXQ+wpYEExYIAD4WIQSQJTNYM0vv3aTmBCs/ 5DDweYZnXQUCXu32OwIbAwUJCWYBgAULCQgHAgYVCgkICwIEFgIDAQIeAQIXgAAKCRA/5DDw eYZnXWAxAP9cDL1j4koUFRBNQyC4iMp/cx5KnozmtsFtiTrWdZBrIwD6A2rLFx60tJryd/qp SZpXk7UPDLH/PY1hstjx9WUbXQjOOARe7fY7EgorBgEEAZdVAQUBAQdAbK0SOaTRrkI2QAWz rCz29D2RDOgGTvEbDpyWiyA5RhQDAQgHwn4EGBYIACYWIQSQJTNYM0vv3aTmBCs/5DDweYZn XQUCXu32OwIbDAUJCWYBgAAKCRA/5DDweYZnXaNOAQDC77ymNjoMZQVgDCcmgZEk6IZxn45k nyW17OYCpRctvgD9Fg3aocAbHK7V9AhmSbDPxLNQygQUPjjU7Cyn97b1cQs= Subject: Re: Network woes,Network woes Message-ID: <9cd59f29-2d05-39df-6b21-207b4254c810@druid.net> Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2020 10:52:49 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20201029.124145.323050090.sthaug@nethelp.no> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="7rJ6K1U4xCrplDotoW9v3RFrOdDD5E1Gx" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4CMT2v4lB1z3bmy X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of darcy@druid.net has no SPF policy when checking 98.158.139.68) smtp.mailfrom=darcy@druid.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.17 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.93)[-0.935]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.98)[-0.982]; MIME_GOOD(-0.20)[multipart/signed,multipart/mixed,text/plain,application/pgp-keys]; HAS_ATTACHMENT(0.00)[]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[druid.net]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.15)[-0.153]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; SIGNED_PGP(-2.00)[]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; RCVD_NO_TLS_LAST(0.10)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:+,3:+,4:+,5:~]; ASN(0.00)[asn:19842, ipnet:98.158.139.0/24, country:CA]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-net] X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.33 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2020 14:53:28 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --7rJ6K1U4xCrplDotoW9v3RFrOdDD5E1Gx Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="Rz671kQwHme7ZF2JGuLAa3Z8rtZRXguGF"; protected-headers="v1" From: D'Arcy Cain To: sthaug@nethelp.no Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Message-ID: <9cd59f29-2d05-39df-6b21-207b4254c810@druid.net> Subject: Re: Network woes,Network woes References: <4598d9be-4be8-9b54-9128-d840c8283f73@druid.net> <20201029.124145.323050090.sthaug@nethelp.no> In-Reply-To: <20201029.124145.323050090.sthaug@nethelp.no> --Rz671kQwHme7ZF2JGuLAa3Z8rtZRXguGF Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------A034D12A0B2C08C5B1C21876" Content-Language: en-US This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------A034D12A0B2C08C5B1C21876 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 10/29/20 7:41 AM, sthaug@nethelp.no wrote: > Here is a ProLiant DL360 Gen9 server with the same type of Ethernet > card: Yes, same server as I have. It's the only Gen9 that I have so far. > % grep 'HP Ethernet' /var/run/dmesg.boot > bge0: mem 0x= 92b90000-0x92b9ffff,0x92ba0000-0x92baffff,0x92bb0000-0x92bbffff irq 16 at= device 0.0 numa-domain 0 on pci14 > bge1: mem 0x= 92b60000-0x92b6ffff,0x92b70000-0x92b7ffff,0x92b80000-0x92b8ffff irq 17 at= device 0.1 numa-domain 0 on pci14 > bge2: mem 0x= 92b30000-0x92b3ffff,0x92b40000-0x92b4ffff,0x92b50000-0x92b5ffff irq 16 at= device 0.2 numa-domain 0 on pci14 > bge3: mem 0x= 92b00000-0x92b0ffff,0x92b10000-0x92b1ffff,0x92b20000-0x92b2ffff irq 17 at= device 0.3 numa-domain 0 on pci14 >=20 > No special network setup needed, it just works - currently running > 12.1-STABLE. FreeBSD 12.1-RELEASE r354233 GENERIC amd64. I guess I can try updating = to=20 12.2 but it seems to me that anything reasonably current should work. It= 's=20 the same as the rest of the servers anyway which all work just fine. I will try upgrading. --=20 D'Arcy J.M. Cain | Democracy is three wolves http://www.druid.net/darcy/ | and a sheep voting on +1 416 788 2246 (DoD#0082) (eNTP) | what's for dinner. IM: darcy@VybeNetworks.com, VoIP: sip:darcy@druid.net Disclaimer: By sending an email to ANY of my addresses you are agreeing that: 1. I am by definition, "the intended recipient". 2. All information in the email is mine to do with as I see fit and make such financial profit, political mileage, or good joke as it lends itself to. In particular, I may quote it where I please. 3. I may take the contents as representing the views of your company if I so wish. 4. This overrides any disclaimer or statement of confidentiality that may be included or implied in your message. --------------A034D12A0B2C08C5B1C21876-- --Rz671kQwHme7ZF2JGuLAa3Z8rtZRXguGF-- --7rJ6K1U4xCrplDotoW9v3RFrOdDD5E1Gx Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="OpenPGP_signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="OpenPGP_signature" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- wnsEABYIACMWIQSQJTNYM0vv3aTmBCs/5DDweYZnXQUCX5rXQQUDAAAAAAAKCRA/5DDweYZnXbJ+ AQC5McqSwjy3OFeXqVz4IbhvrqkNTsRekqaVZDqdwokhMgEAhVRTY2KlF1EWNVTrskh9M0/To6Y7 RZXajR5Ug+pDLQs= =YlXw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --7rJ6K1U4xCrplDotoW9v3RFrOdDD5E1Gx-- From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu Oct 29 14:56:20 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C4B4453B69 for ; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 14:56:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from darcy@druid.net) Received: from mail.vex.net (mail.vex.net [98.158.139.68]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CMT6C3hB0z3bnp for ; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 14:56:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from darcy@druid.net) Received: from imp.druid.net (unknown [38.64.181.54]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: darcy) by mail.vex.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9B2FE4083B for ; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 10:56:18 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: Network woes,Network woes To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org References: <4598d9be-4be8-9b54-9128-d840c8283f73@druid.net> <20201029.124145.323050090.sthaug@nethelp.no> <9cd59f29-2d05-39df-6b21-207b4254c810@druid.net> From: D'Arcy Cain Autocrypt: addr=darcy@druid.net; keydata= xjMEXu32OxYJKwYBBAHaRw8BAQdAD839OEQVMqCs45KVwLKg4srvl51WsVhMpTGOd9z3Ym3N HUQnQXJjeSBDYWluIDxkYXJjeUBkcnVpZC5uZXQ+wpYEExYIAD4WIQSQJTNYM0vv3aTmBCs/ 5DDweYZnXQUCXu32OwIbAwUJCWYBgAULCQgHAgYVCgkICwIEFgIDAQIeAQIXgAAKCRA/5DDw eYZnXWAxAP9cDL1j4koUFRBNQyC4iMp/cx5KnozmtsFtiTrWdZBrIwD6A2rLFx60tJryd/qp SZpXk7UPDLH/PY1hstjx9WUbXQjOOARe7fY7EgorBgEEAZdVAQUBAQdAbK0SOaTRrkI2QAWz rCz29D2RDOgGTvEbDpyWiyA5RhQDAQgHwn4EGBYIACYWIQSQJTNYM0vv3aTmBCs/5DDweYZn XQUCXu32OwIbDAUJCWYBgAAKCRA/5DDweYZnXaNOAQDC77ymNjoMZQVgDCcmgZEk6IZxn45k nyW17OYCpRctvgD9Fg3aocAbHK7V9AhmSbDPxLNQygQUPjjU7Cyn97b1cQs= Message-ID: <7d6060a4-7169-7297-865f-a92ad2e06631@druid.net> Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2020 10:56:18 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <9cd59f29-2d05-39df-6b21-207b4254c810@druid.net> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="tcCkpNqaelKKgKPgC0sOTYulGDVj9ubG4" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4CMT6C3hB0z3bnp X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of darcy@druid.net has no SPF policy when checking 98.158.139.68) smtp.mailfrom=darcy@druid.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.66 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.91)[-0.908]; MIME_GOOD(-0.20)[multipart/signed,multipart/mixed,text/plain,application/pgp-keys]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-net@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; HAS_ATTACHMENT(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[druid.net]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.25)[0.253]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.90)[-0.901]; SIGNED_PGP(-2.00)[]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; RCVD_NO_TLS_LAST(0.10)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:+,3:+,4:+,5:~]; ASN(0.00)[asn:19842, ipnet:98.158.139.0/24, country:CA]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-net] X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.33 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2020 14:56:20 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --tcCkpNqaelKKgKPgC0sOTYulGDVj9ubG4 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="JXxwzYaU4JP7kozlXpUGCPNYBECUC2GB5"; protected-headers="v1" From: D'Arcy Cain To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Message-ID: <7d6060a4-7169-7297-865f-a92ad2e06631@druid.net> Subject: Re: Network woes,Network woes References: <4598d9be-4be8-9b54-9128-d840c8283f73@druid.net> <20201029.124145.323050090.sthaug@nethelp.no> <9cd59f29-2d05-39df-6b21-207b4254c810@druid.net> In-Reply-To: <9cd59f29-2d05-39df-6b21-207b4254c810@druid.net> --JXxwzYaU4JP7kozlXpUGCPNYBECUC2GB5 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------118025E19CB09F3989EDAE8C" Content-Language: en-US This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------118025E19CB09F3989EDAE8C Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 10/29/20 10:52 AM, D'Arcy Cain wrote: > I will try upgrading. Nice try, D'Arcy. how do you plan to do that without networking? :-( --=20 D'Arcy J.M. Cain | Democracy is three wolves http://www.druid.net/darcy/ | and a sheep voting on +1 416 788 2246 (DoD#0082) (eNTP) | what's for dinner. IM: darcy@VybeNetworks.com, VoIP: sip:darcy@druid.net Disclaimer: By sending an email to ANY of my addresses you are agreeing that: 1. I am by definition, "the intended recipient". 2. All information in the email is mine to do with as I see fit and make such financial profit, political mileage, or good joke as it lends itself to. In particular, I may quote it where I please. 3. I may take the contents as representing the views of your company if I so wish. 4. This overrides any disclaimer or statement of confidentiality that may be included or implied in your message. --------------118025E19CB09F3989EDAE8C-- --JXxwzYaU4JP7kozlXpUGCPNYBECUC2GB5-- --tcCkpNqaelKKgKPgC0sOTYulGDVj9ubG4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="OpenPGP_signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="OpenPGP_signature" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- wnsEABYIACMWIQSQJTNYM0vv3aTmBCs/5DDweYZnXQUCX5rYEgUDAAAAAAAKCRA/5DDweYZnXX/W AQCVAM4XI8EZ7gRveX/RxTsuVn7achRw9x8rPuzMSoXrogD9EY4eEeDprZUFqEGnAzjZDHWRBtQ6 Xxp5enklgM3HKQI= =p20V -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --tcCkpNqaelKKgKPgC0sOTYulGDVj9ubG4-- From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu Oct 29 16:24:58 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B3524577BF for ; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 16:24:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CMW4V3Cyjz41HH for ; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 16:24:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 6E4DE4575D5; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 16:24:58 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E1714577BD for ; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 16:24:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CMW4V2Lhpz41bq for ; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 16:24:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 349528A82 for ; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 16:24:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 09TGOwJg068102 for ; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 16:24:58 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 09TGOwAD068101 for net@FreeBSD.org; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 16:24:58 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 118111] rc: network.subr Add MAC address based interface renaming Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2020 16:24:56 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: conf X-Bugzilla-Version: CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: easy, feature, needs-qa X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: portmaster@bsdforge.com X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: kevans@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? mfc-stable12? mfc-stable11? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2020 16:24:58 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D118111 Chris Hutchinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |portmaster@bsdforge.com --- Comment #4 from Chris Hutchinson --- I have/use several multi-port NIC's where something like this would be wonderful to have available. It's now been more than a decade. Any chance we can get this committed before 2030? A big thanks to everyone involved -- especially Thomas. :-) --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Oct 30 17:45:38 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E30E9457A90 for ; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 17:45:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CN8q65m9Zz4HMB for ; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 17:45:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id C5C2D457824; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 17:45:38 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C58614577A1 for ; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 17:45:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CN8q64thgz4HX4 for ; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 17:45:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B4451A697 for ; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 17:45:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 09UHjcYO087418 for ; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 17:45:38 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 09UHjcmS087417 for net@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 17:45:38 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 221445] The absence of the accept_rtadv option causes an error "ping6: sendmsg: No buffer space available" Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2020 17:45:37 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: bin X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.1-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: victor_volpe@bol.com.br X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2020 17:45:38 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D221445 Victor Volpe changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |victor_volpe@bol.com.br --- Comment #9 from Victor Volpe --- Problem still exists, without properly fix. Nice job FreeBSD team! Workaround for OVH dedicated and cloud server: ipv6_activate_all_interfaces=3D"YES" ipv6_default_interface=3D"em0" ifconfig_em0_ipv6=3D"inet6 accept_rtadv IPV6_ADDRESS prefixlen 128" ipv6_static_routes=3D"ovh" ipv6_route_ovh=3D"-host IPV6_GATEWAY -iface em0" ipv6_defaultrouter=3D"IPV6_GATEWAY" --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Oct 30 18:12:53 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 541E64580CF for ; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 18:12:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CN9QY1dRCz4Jks for ; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 18:12:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 37F144581F6; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 18:12:53 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37B7C4580CE for ; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 18:12:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CN9QY0kfsz4JhB for ; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 18:12:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EA7941AB2B for ; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 18:12:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 09UICqxs019379 for ; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 18:12:52 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 09UICqLa019378 for net@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 18:12:52 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 118111] rc: network.subr Add MAC address based interface renaming Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2020 18:12:50 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: conf X-Bugzilla-Version: CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: easy, feature, needs-qa X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: vermaden@interia.pl X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: kevans@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? mfc-stable12? mfc-stable11? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2020 18:12:53 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D118111 vermaden@interia.pl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |vermaden@interia.pl --- Comment #5 from vermaden@interia.pl --- > Any chance we can get this committed before 2030? Loved that one. Made my day :) --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sat Oct 31 11:36:08 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8FAB448EC3 for ; Sat, 31 Oct 2020 11:36:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CNcZJ430mz4MSJ for ; Sat, 31 Oct 2020 11:36:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 883F7448EC1; Sat, 31 Oct 2020 11:36:08 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86DBB448E71 for ; Sat, 31 Oct 2020 11:36:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CNcZJ2rMrz4MCM for ; Sat, 31 Oct 2020 11:36:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40B3E26EB2 for ; Sat, 31 Oct 2020 11:36:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 09VBa8cr076380 for ; Sat, 31 Oct 2020 11:36:08 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 09VBa8lW076379 for net@FreeBSD.org; Sat, 31 Oct 2020 11:36:08 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 238411] [igb] wake on lan not working with Intel I210 Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2020 11:36:07 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: IntelNetworking, needs-qa, regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: yyv83@mail.ru X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2020 11:36:08 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D238411 Yuran changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |yyv83@mail.ru --- Comment #5 from Yuran --- A similar problem is reproduced on 12.2-release with Intel I210 hardware --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sat Oct 31 19:07:25 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84D8C4536F2 for ; Sat, 31 Oct 2020 19:07:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CNpb132R1z3ZQl for ; Sat, 31 Oct 2020 19:07:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 660A6453C01; Sat, 31 Oct 2020 19:07:25 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64CAF4538DD for ; Sat, 31 Oct 2020 19:07:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CNpb11w1jz3ZTF for ; Sat, 31 Oct 2020 19:07:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2432ABE74 for ; Sat, 31 Oct 2020 19:07:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 09VJ7Pbg024724 for ; Sat, 31 Oct 2020 19:07:25 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 09VJ7Ph5024722 for net@FreeBSD.org; Sat, 31 Oct 2020 19:07:25 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 249327] fix IP address parsing in netgraph eating too many characters Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2020 19:07:24 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.1-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: markus@stoffdv.at X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2020 19:07:25 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D249327 --- Comment #2 from Markus Stoff --- The proposed fix has been approved in review D26489. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sat Oct 31 19:26:10 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 481E3453DFD for ; Sat, 31 Oct 2020 19:26:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CNq0f1CmQz3bWT for ; Sat, 31 Oct 2020 19:26:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 27F414543D0; Sat, 31 Oct 2020 19:26:10 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27BB7454346 for ; Sat, 31 Oct 2020 19:26:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CNq0f0H7zz3bjv for ; Sat, 31 Oct 2020 19:26:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E15F8C5D2 for ; Sat, 31 Oct 2020 19:26:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 09VJQ9jm047593 for ; Sat, 31 Oct 2020 19:26:09 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 09VJQ9RX047592 for net@FreeBSD.org; Sat, 31 Oct 2020 19:26:09 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 249327] fix IP address parsing in netgraph eating too many characters Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2020 19:26:09 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.1-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: bz@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2020 19:26:10 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D249327 Bjoern A. Zeeb changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|New |Open --- Comment #3 from Bjoern A. Zeeb --- I added #network to the review so that a committer might also have a look a= nd deal with this. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sat Oct 31 23:37:49 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BF42459073 for ; Sat, 31 Oct 2020 23:37:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CNwb10NDNz47DK for ; Sat, 31 Oct 2020 23:37:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 0B0E74591C8; Sat, 31 Oct 2020 23:37:49 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AD14459072 for ; Sat, 31 Oct 2020 23:37:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CNwb06WCNz4759 for ; Sat, 31 Oct 2020 23:37:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C44B2EF74 for ; Sat, 31 Oct 2020 23:37:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 09VNbmt2064212 for ; Sat, 31 Oct 2020 23:37:48 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 09VNbmRk064211 for net@FreeBSD.org; Sat, 31 Oct 2020 23:37:48 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 248172] if_tuntap(4): OpenVPN configuring tun/tap devices ends up with IFDISABLED interfaces Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2020 23:37:47 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.1-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-qa, regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: bz@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: kevans@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? mfc-stable12? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2020 23:37:49 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D248172 Bjoern A. Zeeb changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|Open |In Progress CC| |hrs@FreeBSD.org --- Comment #22 from Bjoern A. Zeeb --- Gert, can you try this patch (totally untested, not even compile tested): https://people.freebsd.org/~bz/tmp/20201031-02-ip6-ifdisabled.diff This will enable ND6_IFF_IFDISABLED when the interface is created in the ke= rnel before return to user space (if I am right) and user space (driver from dev= d -> /etc/pccard_ether =3D> ... netif start IF =3D> ifdisabled should no longer = execute the last bit and hence not race with your program. I might have seen a similar issue with ppp/tun0 lately. Also adding @hrs to Cc: as he know this logic a lot better than me and might know of other pitfalls by doing this. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sat Oct 31 23:40:14 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89DDF45924C for ; Sat, 31 Oct 2020 23:40:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CNwdp39hRz47FL for ; Sat, 31 Oct 2020 23:40:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 6B0FB458F6D; Sat, 31 Oct 2020 23:40:14 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AD56459492 for ; Sat, 31 Oct 2020 23:40:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CNwdp2JG9z47SP for ; Sat, 31 Oct 2020 23:40:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 33F88F60C for ; Sat, 31 Oct 2020 23:40:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 09VNeEA0066233 for ; Sat, 31 Oct 2020 23:40:14 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 09VNeEKZ066232 for net@FreeBSD.org; Sat, 31 Oct 2020 23:40:14 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 248172] OpenVPN configuring tun/tap devices ends up with IFDISABLED interfaces (problem with all ifnet, especially cloned ones) Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2020 23:40:13 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.1-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-qa, regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: bz@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: kevans@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? mfc-stable12? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: short_desc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2020 23:40:14 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D248172 Bjoern A. Zeeb changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|if_tuntap(4): OpenVPN |OpenVPN configuring tun/tap |configuring tun/tap devices |devices ends up with |ends up with IFDISABLED |IFDISABLED interfaces |interfaces |(problem with all ifnet, | |especially cloned ones) --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=