From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Jun 28 06:42:24 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFD9D341B64 for ; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 06:42:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dwilde1@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lj1-x241.google.com (mail-lj1-x241.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::241]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49vgz33FJNz41CT; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 06:42:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dwilde1@gmail.com) Received: by mail-lj1-x241.google.com with SMTP id s9so14410820ljm.11; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 23:42:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=OkTFGx6XqJQ5ySpNgFuFGxXplCV+X2pzb0oTKS5Jic8=; b=AraWViB+D0djbAzGNAaowkx1aFDBNUbLKtvqQBEmpzO9i7ngsF0gINzbxU2NaCrJhU XBjm+7/exweTgUQtzf2vwI6CjpzGuEpqZ2tMRrTUuahH7H1a55vk6ML3lbFSmI7gUXLB s+oj3VTVcjHaB74jEzWi6w+ZhizaG58W7rseR3w+Uko/Tik+axUb4CXDVbD4yhQng0n7 CarHZWYH6rLTgLA2Gh+TcSmG45HrYbR28QRoUpR4W0mOTvKadDxVQ6HWkXgNC+sAiuFR JYfx7dxqRVoOoSMNrXca0+cK/Q5BVDAH6a0VbSMbWJI+IYm5acn1A8cqOjKHpNm4yUJS EYnQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=OkTFGx6XqJQ5ySpNgFuFGxXplCV+X2pzb0oTKS5Jic8=; b=gykaCz1flHNBzvk5kfoXKbmApsXhUl6VXh8k1d+GXLJTr9P0jet1RklNCcVl1P5uox eFFYRw5iCiDZGSLyr7+JGbX36/eXcPm/MTVC5FM43TwAoUBJMk/wsq9w+D6Gn5pQqVB3 2Uo9lOj/uePOpStHcbNcuOOhr84nqWdt6wpmvaP1kSDOGWVLAW5dYcykurzJ8ps8brqo zhEnfjnF7S/TnzdluVB+qljgpVEwzBUCSX9sASGmgOT5WrC4nlDzOh55CnPIfaEOJFPk c2LVcqq/z0txL32z74aRGr5cdeyZs4sQMJRYgp8orr0ldSMvHitX+3Fu7awmXP8QcVkS 0okA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530Tiew72HvFtz6/GQSPVSH4FZUAbVvIfqix6VynDNhfwGQS0txP gQDDjbF1aqeVv2555e/R+RMgRXQn7vq1+ixlY0ZrVkYC X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwkY33m67IDOoQ9+BK7UCI9yMNWsOeHs2+nNFr7FzJwt54UsdUW1opSlQI5DBfLEXL7m02sjky86CfQFTXDaQ0= X-Received: by 2002:a05:651c:2cc:: with SMTP id f12mr4990819ljo.329.1593326541079; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 23:42:21 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 2002:ab3:4703:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 23:42:20 -0700 (PDT) Reply-To: dwilde1@gmail.com In-Reply-To: References: <20200626164512.GA2475@elch.exwg.net> <20200626232448.GB2475@elch.exwg.net> From: Donald Wilde Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2020 23:42:20 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: stable postgresql11 appears to have issues To: Christoph Moench-Tegeder Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, pgsql@freebsd.org, brooks@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49vgz33FJNz41CT X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=AraWViB+; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of dwilde1@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4864:20::241 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=dwilde1@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.85 / 15.00]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[dwilde1@gmail.com]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.99)[-0.993]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a00:1450:4000::/36]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; FREEMAIL_REPLYTO(0.00)[gmail.com]; REPLYTO_ADDR_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.09)[0.095]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.95)[-0.948]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2a00:1450:4864:20::241:from]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2a00:1450::/32, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com:dkim] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2020 06:42:24 -0000 On 6/26/20, Donald Wilde wrote: > On 6/26/20, Christoph Moench-Tegeder wrote: >> ## Donald Wilde (dwilde1@gmail.com): >> >>> This is 12-STABLE as of a few days ago, and yes, it's running on >>> amd64/HAMMER. >> >> So, llvm 10. As I guessed :) >> An update. Synth is still crashing and I am attempting to also solve that one in another thread. On this front, while working with synth I noticed that the /usr/ports/distfiles directory no longer seems to be created and used by default. Synth asked me to create one outside of the ports tree and add it to make.conf. I did so, To cut to the chase, this caused a whole slew of issues. The postgresql11-server package created its own /usr/ports/distfiles/postgresql directory, ignoring my setting of DISTFILES=/var/distfiles, and all the dependencies of pg11 crashed for the same reason. Removing that new directory and accepting /usr/ports/distfiles as an "is so" fact of life seems to have allowed the pg11 build to go forward. The workaround in make.conf for DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=llvm=10 is in there as well. Back to the other thread in -stable! -- Don Wilde **************************************************** * What is the Internet of Things but a system * * of systems including humans? * **************************************************** From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Jun 28 15:22:48 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12D4134EE53 for ; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 15:22:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd01@dgmm.net) Received: from know-smtprelay-omd-4.server.virginmedia.net (know-smtprelay-omd-4.server.virginmedia.net [81.104.62.36]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "Client", Issuer "Virgin Media Core Infrastructure Root" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49vvWW08mxz4XfG for ; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 15:22:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd01@dgmm.net) Received: from amd.asgard.uk ([92.236.194.74]) by cmsmtp with ESMTPA id pZ8mjIn3K1XIfpZ8mjC3o1; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 16:22:44 +0100 X-Originating-IP: [92.236.194.74] X-Authenticated-User: xtalsinger@blueyonder.co.uk X-Authority: v=2.3 cv=d+PbNyrE c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=X8sCwORSJZhUY8vvAW5pvw==:117 a=X8sCwORSJZhUY8vvAW5pvw==:17 a=r77TgQKjGQsHNAKrUKIA:9 a=a4NEJbfMAAAA:8 a=X4DRpiUgBppWXixIw6IA:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=Rfq9imeAOi7FlWnz:21 a=_W_S_7VecoQA:10 From: Dave To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Reply-To: freebsd01@dgmm.net Subject: Re: Port OPTIONS advice Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2020 16:22:44 +0100 Message-ID: <1704293.CJpZife00y@amd.asgard.uk> In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfBYz+e67tw5ZQGbWesq+W+8hp0fs+ssXInBDSyPhv+8tV6RJHxX+oy1eTNsUIs5jsvi6Yi6byrO6OKr4ryjKTAkA7yYowSYRKWyBwyePG7aafgsGij8q OTJpeVBzVeh64hrJ3H1x+5e09b26/PG9WICTtKy/LW6L/BeCJE32sn8OlqQd4QAsbfuDsfnZeqHWjw== X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49vvWW08mxz4XfG X-Spamd-Bar: ++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=softfail (mx1.freebsd.org: 81.104.62.36 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of freebsd01@dgmm.net) smtp.mailfrom=freebsd01@dgmm.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [2.26 / 15.00]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[freebsd01@dgmm.net]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; HAS_XOIP(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.52)[0.515]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; REPLYTO_ADDR_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; R_SPF_SOFTFAIL(0.00)[~all]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[92.236.194.74:received]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.48)[0.483]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.87)[0.867]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[81.104.62.36:from]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[dgmm.net]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; ASN(0.00)[asn:5089, ipnet:81.104.0.0/15, country:GB]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; CTE_CASE(0.50)[]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[81.104.62.36:from] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.33 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2020 15:22:48 -0000 On Wednesday, 20 May 2020 18:25:00 BST SirDice wrote: > Some time ago I took over maintainership of fs-uae. And I'd like to thank you very much for that! :-) I finally got around to installing it, what with have an unexpected few spare months of time on my hands. I managed to dump my old A1200 HDD to a file and eventually got it to boot after a trip down memory lane figuring out how to edit startup-sequence and user-startup to remove things like the SCSI drivers. There was one issue when I upgraded FreeBSD 11.3 --> 11.4. fs-uae would crash out immediately the main window opened. Even after doing a pkg upgrade -f I still ended up having to manually build some related graphics libraries before it would work again (Sorry, I didn't keep notes, IIRC it was mesa stuff) So now all I need to do is find a cheap gamepad that will work with it on FreeBSD :-) If anyone is interested, you can download the Assassin Games CDs full of PD games from archive.org (and much other Amiga related goodness. They boot and play just fine on fs-uae assuming you have the correct ROM file(s)) Sorry if that last bit came over as a bit of a commercial but it's years since I even plugged my old A1200 in, let alone played games on it. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Jun 28 19:21:43 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 903DC352F61 for ; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 19:21:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jonc@chen.org.nz) Received: from mail-ot1-x343.google.com (mail-ot1-x343.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::343]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49w0qB3YfGz3Vqp for ; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 19:21:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jonc@chen.org.nz) Received: by mail-ot1-x343.google.com with SMTP id 72so13560851otc.3 for ; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 12:21:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chen-org-nz.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=LKMCKykSxqj4zJCWK1BpMs8dx9Mp8DZVj0rwx/ZRlKc=; b=aL7yujxZaTuEncVyo9od+QwcIVHOwXAjMeZ8KVwttLHvynznHyk5+qobQToxQqn1P+ O2bBZmUm0pdsp9eeSK/S2hgZ3YHXNdng13G+RESSnE0p7pWdGIJxvDQgkUTQIdK8RgUA IBJg4JsD/miWOLlueXuVz3tf5JmMHtoW3j2Z68RPioSryWR1DSeagB3Rxa5RqqYwaJkA P2rfjsz+LHBM+834DD0VqF3Wflrw2a+ybf5ZhQPpuINep5VMg3vgdgLpng9RietIwD8y EsgBFjcrxri/Sfw5kVInc7ypr9Fq/YKV6AkvbRbBQ2z+Nj1rx4zUrUDNVxIQ8fFAKx0h y74Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=LKMCKykSxqj4zJCWK1BpMs8dx9Mp8DZVj0rwx/ZRlKc=; b=A6vRcZCrSay7s9bzZ9pKRHm8AHNn6F8nW71k/YZrtD+F90zC1i3GsdzMLyEWAQlXF3 JFIlM06JGdZS/UiEO1xkW+0TxCBSSWl5lUC6/q41e71E5cxmkvcQ76BZBkZN4MplcP64 ixwF26VegnNeNnbSQemRXYXDhr7/jYi3ABgGuuOF8B4nluWs2DH1AGKbWCb8HYKvqF+z NeBy4BrypnVAhCxF5O9D27DOhE3ECFTGimnRUxzoO18zqWYDRppJGZXm/cTrzeck8vQm 547cejxj3YzEDh9LfIHt2k5B0afzx2o5aBJrVLebD7O74/BjTkWUubF/Fud+l2JqTzxT FYHA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531DZkNm2eCsFWmKHsHPTDBzke58bHXuJzUdRcnxko97z8PLFAe9 GotDCGP/uDHC7uYZUk4tPkH121oEuF43t6oL/jcYmpreMGc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzI6YQrDiB2gS7NbBlXbE36++XfaXEzNeTK3+Iu2ne2bY5zymMNzmi6b6P0W9SatayUWfiWME28Nwwli9IIPmY= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:1d8c:: with SMTP id y12mr11012880oti.162.1593372100090; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 12:21:40 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200626164512.GA2475@elch.exwg.net> <20200626232448.GB2475@elch.exwg.net> In-Reply-To: From: Jonathan Chen Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2020 07:21:24 +1200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: stable postgresql11 appears to have issues To: dwilde1@gmail.com Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49w0qB3YfGz3Vqp X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=chen-org-nz.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=aL7yujxZ; dmarc=none; spf=softfail (mx1.freebsd.org: 2607:f8b0:4864:20::343 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of jonc@chen.org.nz) smtp.mailfrom=jonc@chen.org.nz X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.98 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.82)[-0.820]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[chen-org-nz.20150623.gappssmtp.com:s=20150623]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.04)[0.038]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.90)[-0.897]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; R_SPF_SOFTFAIL(0.00)[~all]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[chen.org.nz]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[chen-org-nz.20150623.gappssmtp.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::343:from]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[gmail.com]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2020 19:21:43 -0000 On Sun, 28 Jun 2020 at 18:42, Donald Wilde wrote: > An update. Synth is still crashing and I am attempting to also solve > that one in another thread. On this front, while working with synth I > noticed that the /usr/ports/distfiles directory no longer seems to be > created and used by default. Synth asked me to create one outside of > the ports tree and add it to make.conf. I did so, Adding directives to /etc/make.conf is the wrong place for synth. You need to add it to /usr/local/etc/synth/LiveSystem-make.conf. It's all in the man-page for synth. Cheers. -- Jonathan Chen From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Jun 28 20:08:13 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E1443541B7 for ; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 20:08:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from DutchDaemon@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::24b:4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49w1rs1tFlz3XSh for ; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 20:08:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from DutchDaemon@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [10.255.0.22] (ansible.tepucom.nl [91.190.105.24]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: dutchdaemon/mail) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E84362EFF9 for ; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 20:08:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from DutchDaemon@FreeBSD.org) To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: DutchDaemon - FreeBSD Forums Administrator Subject: Can anyone build www/node right now? Autocrypt: addr=DutchDaemon@FreeBSD.org; keydata= mQINBFzVrs4BEADBxTfsrhISlpGxuyBslg1ALG9m7fNwVR2C8i3/6j9bgbb4jXsHoGfLECwa qfVyPn6tdHYAQmbWBnTXzZy/bzUlFoCmeNZUbQ2WXvO2s9WXMblZ6nersNt7EPfBMl+1JMLr UU2/B8rA9bUkXF7Bs2OXdJsVE4N1JnIc4S6xhemSh3p+ldJAoIr2snG2fxWqM8ILtkvFpg8I k7vpS2Dy24FeRTAenG6tKGOsKs/pvPVOaPa5DrVhw8N+XlZ+fsxlABt7BjDeKl4JsO3oQibL 7ZtN0Fkrno/Oi/wYPBMPdUL9Cnz2eWGoDjTw+SltsGQsTf0L8CyjuIRzW7G8spR7ilI9cPBX LmBGszEse4GhBHxxboRgdZsgJSIgevG932f2qiL2J/NmFdfdObI5oDMTDvczSYcUssko1S9H N05SKGLj1Mi8a5w7cJ9lIZzYdcfQZJLHjwGe0BTiAGt9kWbBvdyopw0Pe95EH+gBX0PcLZHY eDDznoQEgN2tKkblNFcqbq7iTgz1ux/mXvsbQOf4yhOo+40SDU3MHY/Vi/w8pth3DF/kv+T/ 1QS134zUkl5lKeeogX+wVz8w8p6xq8YPFIP/tUaI3moxLH8tIICL4G6Tx07yyv29e84vaW7z 2GH9iype6Lphm+LwtuH5JE9omXgR+5UMHmwFRCy/HyU9IIdsoQARAQABtEREdXRjaERhZW1v biAtIEZyZWVCU0QgRm9ydW1zIEFkbWluaXN0cmF0b3IgPER1dGNoRGFlbW9uQEZyZWVCU0Qu b3JnPokCVwQTAQgAQQIbIwUJCWYBgAULCQgHAgYVCgkICwIEFgIDAQIeAQIXgBYhBPQFlL3G bv5Tua98GdEdnm9HMmuoBQJdaC6xAhkBAAoJENEdnm9HMmuolcwQAKJoShuB0IRRxH7NlfI5 rVgcSeWBlwwrS5b/Oja96gEu5BqoPq59so8rRjcmU+7Z4mC3ryZAYeDvq7/qGQ4pC9G3P9N+ 13Cg1+vqaXkmuxq6Daj+FWKE1XCNQI+dbUC4zLS2+glCujSdFw4ce75DGFlCErcJC75xbKMj swqL92C/I94vClO/DGbLIbohIEQljqB4GY42geqUgWMtr+ZKPj7yGEieVvaytu7+bV3oX0WL 9viP14lnO47mDr3YmnsqxjJXDDQet45evhZ6iGY4iWyUM1xn7LHN8CZ6GJPcwu/Od/GhG0h7 96jE49fuM51UPSnAu/NAu1megpgThyjikWJBLoGYx+WYi9ri/LzmTQWPn3m+Y/whS06ZDn7v Q2nyrmCBbM/Rk1Jj71cqsohhCJC4MbkLXquXmAaWz3/zzwnSmMN8AFL8YmLoR9WJzwSx2W8l q8kacLhm97h/qxXyZJFCoZQwd6nKJlNm2QNhXkAotbrPHKZ71OJPI7bu78Q3JjQwAVRNgqqz UQk2Ydduw1CKF6XBIhRauKKSIRxfIHBSpphXmMrIpaFeK4MH+ePslV1rD9DfFto4nDzTT8fz 7Kw1FejR5iOoi51i1SnXnttiJf9FPj6j1i7QS78zZpvdgm1S1MN+jzH3HV1x+2F+F2O0BpQM 6hyBU2BYl7xw7PKLuQINBFzVrs4BEACY/uqLL8YtKIDa1z3kg+S7IVPDTKbkCeFb7p8cUSJv Mq32kyndxWjulsZGigDoBBvj7mjqzhbUwrpvioNRytKoxF850/gxjqipcjvrQ2vawhX/VbkA LA8+Ml04iLD9Cb6k8cyODwyNq0BQpThrHTfogcSpEQ15BvHSfw4t6w9dL3bEn2G/kpzajcLO CQQH8uZRFzKL5cTcT418DkrVoqvPj+KO+5iKVrmE2ug65qjW+9frgZRfW/HJa0XTFXnfhrUS /q7JtpbJlBDmiP/yXvl75mXrOTtcGN59dXSU7Zj3AVowCmDtOqA6Ckm2TblrrW/fEeTkJ/AW qWHe+H2KNN/AdkTjxAQO63rcDNKHEquz6JfKxH5UTe0dk0xhUswbFcNfUAAwk4kKR05IiZoY 2h26p9d1Q+q5kKmp0fEW0kJO/OzPunmlqTPnZ/rw9ec7alNlMc67Zp52ggYG66fG/Jvm9RrR gthFnJYigQQDW0WzuLtYmM4LJt6FEw5mlEXYds4Ep9UqhPID4BGoNT8Zk4X9b6iNFaIRU7Mt 9qOKbAc6VD1L1gQLGiTq/l+Zvt0DL1nQXyXoGodlR4a2mtL+93lC23DW8cmzwcgFXJUV9UBo 5a6tmdnF/k5dF1BRUgjMvBYlxxnDcFx1lYdJ9EZNqpACajd7/7dGJp9/6c0xZMQVmwARAQAB iQI8BBgBCAAmFiEE9AWUvcZu/lO5r3wZ0R2eb0cya6gFAlzVrs4CGwwFCQlmAYAACgkQ0R2e b0cya6j1SQ//Qr7J5meamYGTJwmguFXu3HTNZeKVZRC6yjYqfoG5tbb/fOhPPLdfkcwIrIFO Wzx5vao+i66XmktpqTIdVaVDwIlS9yoXpEMRM1TstiK7usoNGztGYejQfRvxOVJIwgwCBnfs FApYGfD2BHm6yhiny0Kmp3wIF66Xe0GNN3eVqcKe3F9DrDl1nwcYGldD7ImsbwvCayqfGq0H 3UJRw3HwVZl0+8N/TPJ7O/aFPGOxCkRK2LNgLE93qX0RnWj1iYRAA2aFPngrufTJUjCj5ME6 dAmsS+iZKr0Swx+q/hCrHNzNeOsimARWF8yPxTE5f6qDMyXGkb1dp+IV1qbJaKBH1dUoHp2R 2Zmhubp1B9uipqJDolpEP7TwDpxRW9blOuyMuRMjcpvluqnUCIMtRW5BtKRM0/OQuwhLjFjL 0fm3KH/3h3SiS1s21mhFwbd02x3YrQUbypyEiS6V68fVsaAsi2GcL3NiePDCrcyjMwClivXi 34sMjL+GVBIFdvcgxEMii8MC0U5hnWRxG6uKlJ5jJWvuu/KmDx32GW8NpuaadxuqWloMHf/J jfFlwCm6XAyoYSTN/5rE2qtzgCIgzOGNUSRBYfnCmUD1WS8D5Cm1FDBKSUL2PZ64vyIQBX2O cQ7571C00BqMxqiTopGbh85U/jL6FWJbq2YWxftW7HF81eM= Organization: The FreeBSD Forums Message-ID: <66e8ea52-da15-72ef-ce21-efc4d265cd3a@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2020 22:07:58 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="kAxNVnnYnj5qLQVtDR27Q3Hii9Lwzm3Mf" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.33 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2020 20:08:13 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --kAxNVnnYnj5qLQVtDR27Q3Hii9Lwzm3Mf Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="kOdOh1cKJ4QGsOYz6jDKQnl5BrxcVblSu" --kOdOh1cKJ4QGsOYz6jDKQnl5BrxcVblSu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I have tried to build www/node for weeks now, and it always fails. This i= s on a fresh Poudriere jail, amd64, 12.1-REL-p6. Opened a ticket for it, with full output, but no response yet. To rule an= y interference out, I built this in a clean jail, without any make.conf o= r port options, bog standard defaults. All 33 (from pkg to binutils) dependencies built correctly (as was always= the case), but www/node bombed on the same error as always. See https://pastebin.pl/view/3a6f48db for this latest clean build; the er= ror is invariably: ----------------------------------------------------------- Traceback (most recent call last): =C2=A0 File "tools/genv8constants.py", line 23, in =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 bufsize=3D-1, stdout=3Dsubprocess.PIPE, text=3DTrue).s= tdout TypeError: __init__() got an unexpected keyword argument 'text' gmake[2]: *** [node_dtrace_ustack.target.mk:13: /wrkdirs/usr/ports/www/no= de/work/node-v14.4.0/out/Release/obj/gen/v8constants.h] Error 1 gmake[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... rm ad3fd4c76aef3b4797bbb2572833f9000cee0294.intermediate ea2d89ddb30e54c8= a8d75f33fc84b228111d7c67.intermediate ed36ab92458644e121416e8697a6b64c051= c72b0.intermediate gmake[1]: *** [Makefile:101: node] Error 2 gmake[1]: Leaving directory '/wrkdirs/usr/ports/www/node/work/node-v14.4.= 0' =3D=3D=3D> Compilation failed unexpectedly. Try to set MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE=3Dyes and rebuild before reporting the failur= e to the maintainer. *** Error code 1 ----------------------------------------------------------- Previous build attempts on 12-REL-p5 amd 64, with clean and resued jails:= https://pastebin.pl/view/4953a503 https://pastebin.pl/view/db278ac3 https://pastebin.pl/view/e3c16e57 https://pastebin.pl/view/f3fcdfbf --kOdOh1cKJ4QGsOYz6jDKQnl5BrxcVblSu-- --kAxNVnnYnj5qLQVtDR27Q3Hii9Lwzm3Mf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEE9AWUvcZu/lO5r3wZ0R2eb0cya6gFAl74+KoACgkQ0R2eb0cy a6gj+Q//ZIP2cS9t+icJlyseIpAN2J+fjTIkK6U/rX7Vaei7L4jTkp+xEORk57GK Ce+1cxcCumks1DQ1zu88lH8sTqpPk8aKHNyHx6dngOvDwCD7zwKvj2meWV5YGhFV Ok8xh5P56R5XiHg+l+JyfBgj8X7nQW2x1nChiBBMBaNXpQvQ2apyA8cL3k9WADg6 KOm9SuDBuwbp0q89khpBycSAbNdGxlc3g1q1co5LpOyuIwTyuxg1B2XSqeVGCtZa XNJfTR6+XdQ290US8CuGv9vDfLzKcujYq8gI9CEXRuBmoG1eCHWgCR3LH+xxKu5R NBQkpnkJPL7bC6J2x2P/NGXIbSKHjtGHwH7mvmQjC9h0qqS7rX52vR9iT7J3cNPO OVu1iiCcFqSAXByouBTa14HSve6Zrxtv5FQzSaWTKDko+nvuIlbMOeQAsU63xaqO +z5aGu5dAbX4P/CtAaH9EuP94PZxHF5G2/sMkbMG+DU09UMXYXIg8qMQhH06GgLn 1kpby5OEMoiuYHBuX5O5NsG3GgpXP0E4bwJiiiefWL8fTI03FeY7WkDXixNVpOSw +P6qoT1NqdEoxdogRzb1tOntppxbWB0u/yFMMdUjmWggOLlSYC2dNoUF3SY5iheu xy0fmWzuw+jSQ2gaVq5fFDwGnMCcr/ys+zyM6xcYRyDUdT7qbXY= =wxQw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --kAxNVnnYnj5qLQVtDR27Q3Hii9Lwzm3Mf-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Jun 28 20:22:01 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44285354668 for ; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 20:22:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david@catwhisker.org) Received: from mx.catwhisker.org (mx.catwhisker.org [107.204.234.170]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49w28m54dQz3YDh; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 20:22:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david@catwhisker.org) Received: from albert.catwhisker.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by albert.catwhisker.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 05SKLxB1003209; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 20:21:59 GMT (envelope-from david@albert.catwhisker.org) Received: (from david@localhost) by albert.catwhisker.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 05SKLxgk003208; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 13:21:59 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from david) Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2020 13:21:59 -0700 From: David Wolfskill To: DutchDaemon - FreeBSD Forums Administrator Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Can anyone build www/node right now? Message-ID: <20200628202159.GC1454@albert.catwhisker.org> Reply-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <66e8ea52-da15-72ef-ce21-efc4d265cd3a@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="eHhjakXzOLJAF9wJ" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <66e8ea52-da15-72ef-ce21-efc4d265cd3a@FreeBSD.org> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49w28m54dQz3YDh X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7018, ipnet:107.192.0.0/12, country:US]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2020 20:22:01 -0000 --eHhjakXzOLJAF9wJ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Jun 28, 2020 at 10:07:58PM +0200, DutchDaemon - FreeBSD Forums Admi= nistrator wrote: > I have tried to build www/node for weeks now, and it always fails. This i= s on a fresh Poudriere jail, amd64, 12.1-REL-p6. Checking my logs, www/node is one of the packages built (via poudriere) this morning by my build machine, which was running: freebeast(12.1-S)[1] uname -aUK FreeBSD freebeast.catwhisker.org 12.1-STABLE FreeBSD 12.1-STABLE #942 r3627= 16M/362719: Sun Jun 28 03:33:45 PDT 2020 root@freebeast.catwhisker.org:= /common/S1/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/sys/GENERIC amd64 1201518 1201518 at the time, using a (head) ports tree at r540699. As a reality check, I am trying to build www/node on my laptop, running: g1-55(12.1-S)[4] uname -aUK FreeBSD g1-55.catwhisker.org 12.1-STABLE FreeBSD 12.1-STABLE #737 r362716M/= 362719: Sun Jun 28 03:33:54 PDT 2020 root@g1-48.catwhisker.org:/common/= S1/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/sys/CANARY amd64 1201518 1201518 with a (head) ports tree at r540699. The build machine has no option overrides for www/node; the laptop shows: g1-55(12.1-S)[2] make -C /usr/ports/www/node showconfig =3D=3D=3D> The following configuration options are available for node-14.4.= 0: BUNDLED_SSL=3Don: Use node.js's bundled OpenSSL implementation DOCS=3Don: Build and/or install documentation DTRACE=3Don: Build with DTrace probes NLS=3Don: Native Language Support =3D=3D=3D> Use 'make config' to modify these settings > Opened a ticket for it, with full output... Peace, david --=20 David H. Wolfskill david@catwhisker.org Of course Black Lives Matter! Now vote accordingly! See http://www.catwhisker.org/~david/publickey.gpg for my public key. --eHhjakXzOLJAF9wJ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQGTBAEBCgB9FiEE4owz2QxMJyaxAefyQLJg+bY2PckFAl74++dfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldEUy OEMzM0Q5MEM0QzI3MjZCMTAxRTdGMjQwQjI2MEY5QjYzNjNEQzkACgkQQLJg+bY2 PcntnggAyiS0gmXeXbRenbqW8PeCdsxd81RwuHUpTU4ze8bFQmlsHZfml7qex4cv hMCEoj+bGSRCRVRRl0xbXmrE9kbP+k5ViSXwIQV210NnAZH3z3vQxX+pfOUsSypV KdJ3Prwn9IbUBbpOKXnoE2Y28aqaLVcCm6Fp1c/FJg1oY/PP1Q6+CFlx81gnKlbb Q7F9vhm41TLE8ysYVcIG7XIDoKGbCvHmgc7gy1lCJY5ees6Vw0cUGrr0o1p2aU04 smCr+nz29oZcZ8ytHFfdZiP9BrwxY3o6f3cq1ufN2xAxTcWuXxN0PuQ9/XBvl9Kt MwGGnVqE8/pCk+Rl+u19OVdRGIjaAA== =F1UL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --eHhjakXzOLJAF9wJ-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Jun 28 20:25:11 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED6CB354846 for ; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 20:25:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from george+freebsd@m5p.com) Received: from mailhost.m5p.com (mailhost.m5p.com [74.104.188.4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "m5p.com", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49w2DQ64vgz3YMC for ; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 20:25:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from george+freebsd@m5p.com) Received: from [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:15ff::26] (court.m5p.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:15ff:0:0:0:26]) (authenticated bits=0) by mailhost.m5p.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id 05SKOt8R094301 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 16:25:02 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from george+freebsd@m5p.com) To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <66e8ea52-da15-72ef-ce21-efc4d265cd3a@FreeBSD.org> From: George Mitchell Autocrypt: addr=george+freebsd@m5p.com; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= mQINBFgnLnwBEADAJDiBKQX77LFRz9wZW8mz3KvaQol2nIremcws0F1mz/zgFlk6uhQVtwnL wb4XL5LdFwcNE1+QZzPLcbYWoWQlz0lBw1bMuKAgr0S6V2e0+I0DqhKeslVFctcTwtvT6pnK VLZXO/7ZGAaLzG4K5vSPzgoevU+YI/pxNsVCH2UO/c3jQW63uEt25mIZbCF1Pu4jgp4RhIgF ujn877r/j6OwBwjzRUu3E6ADp+U825d+5YCuQMEH0wIPnn9GTpXvfdKdbwOIl2akqXqs4cnk iATWfK3r6D4mvDEj1OPHlTvJYcfic7aOIiAwmx1C1v78GjXOdOOA0SGffNix3C2/8oZUO1+V Aet4MKpUKkduWSvULhIkHNZ5Nu8SIJOqge8pmtHxuNXAMfMrAjMdjPwwBFLsYg3Xa2E2oJwg ehTauwd/EDJFcVCyDCyCAYOi/BH/+XQyxzgDlY9N9qj9tHqhVPI6XK7t8UVffGiZUq4rHp5J RdOToqiTNC6eCJBczhMIW+DuFvWU9e6W708T1dz0Accn6Lrgk4eRIn3GFPBG+TxnpjAqHsbW 607dcnD3YKAqY4e+khczL4EObhe7dC1v2fmZiAC6Ds3WHR11IfqoUgCkIwJ590Ej+ElygJFF XxI82wtEz9hkeLLvItpyEJNVjppViRW+Dgl/U7ypHB3qDgYjgwARAQABtChHZW9yZ2UgTWl0 Y2hlbGwgPGdlb3JnZStmcmVlYnNkQG01cC5jb20+iQJUBBMBCAA+FiEENdM4ZHktsJW5kKZX wRES3m+p4fkFAlhZcR0CGyMFCQlmAYAFCwkIBwIGFQgJCgsCBBYCAwECHgECF4AACgkQwRES 3m+p4flqmw/9Emr/ydTG2n9o/IX1yVCNcHVFenVrcOY0L+DGQYZRO/XpLvsGYcuSIQId1w7h l4HZKI89ri2fF2ks6upMqBajLf8s7a8PnYrbw5bPaoOFyNTjv57GLZVsYw95kmMUpK6siuAA fXvHfKUpC/sThbwSv/1CLryVG74+5vdI8j7cQeDM436FThxlVfHKrILIiL34D4WThFB3hV/Y 2A+mQwXmdLcuQXXeAazqsFJL8sgEKSC7GMcExDkVpGc5Rh2hu97a4Sa7qWX9G/YdZOrcDacJ XxfvePn3m3WfRtXN/r0lUfiVXiqkFfbvqSaZQ0I4UvZXNGd/gH4jKHtX9RTH9G96UZeHNoMo tPw9U0fx8Ceh72nUL9qzqnmok/ryWm+6gt4Q1eRP7QAosOa1g/RgUdS1Z9IuCmbXMDp5kbNw L4ZoDMF5U3mmh8/IOKkhGopNLbNv0mwUgC59pnCptiOVx8DyckXWC4L2r6PKbWGrcGIzsUER 9smfL10gpp5H5agjwwPZI6/kzJ0R5nBzQWAlwqI73YAy6JI0HTD6lvxW7yWm2fGjEfmyaBOU 8OLUin7auoFSn+QmD5yNCUn5Ls77qHARkT1ZGocAnQkvZBGTwXpvyJixygXsm+vSUFDYBOSn cR54vdXOEMqrJk6SGau5YI9V7EhQVveE1BUp8ofWf2oo4RG5Ag0EWCcufAEQALuTOxmqMFE+ ieev/rcL3wVJrcuKS+pBbKCY9IIL0OwVf98HQJJcgdOsdDhruVd19nJNlwZ3Fc34wLw7y2GO 9WrpZiYKnI4n9urhLE5r1ydBInlI/1UKZWgM3/dPjJtcXMsC3vnqR9DmOxW4/SbqJDjP3XzO FleT4yip3AaNhPGwEPTZrubVp5hp/JojaZn690TLRwOFXg8NcjpOEs0Bq9M+OLpmsF0flrgs yDfS7y+SQ17R4Iq9T7RxZvZVAh510yGGIZIETYO/4Dh417VVm+gaksOVh2egetpUUvYYc0Ub KaP+5F/WGNrmRb1F6SKypvLlKkYAHCsUUSzsAGl9gbQhEEpuOMbUKp1979HoRMkW+8046kIo 8BZ6ph8izG/g4dZOaEqKGEhqdhYIB7UwMtFFuPtSs5Nl6JrZYni/nzFtTmtVCgcj9PNqrzqt fNFYhNznD6St6wxp3TOm9D3TQF0dzwBM1jZpb8WvmK3k6oy8hbpjiBzxn3kyRA9Vzy+PdbN/ G5a1k0rpZu/ivpBuLCDVGljUmgQigXg6xkk5UxBoHp7MPvG9prZ5jqdEa2r1KgnGjaq+VJsu Uqrw10dVgeG1NulDU1+sQl+/mwtflbkimhjDDjxsVgfrv7uvV/9be+gGm1KATuqdgCboSb1s QAo5ARfwFfChrnh+fTfPpPKHABEBAAGJAiQEGAEIAA8FAlgnLnwCGwwFCQlmAYAACgkQwRES 3m+p4fno9w/4m+swztkzxSWdutjgSv2mw+PdrKWVGFAUD2HoY1Qpi5LNLE6s9pP3qzwpQYwK viOufVJYWZ540ss6BImZBGJwyHouacqrpZjpRo5+ftj07rY1SNd8QjcHDggPfpgJ1D4Il3Xi vRg5/gzkXnRu8dXeVvMP1Ndk/F5wcoLZlQwFtPfu2xyRYIsveXMoyypAvAFSaAGXU0hRzuDJ fGI3LFvpI9UXU2C4MMzjfyZyD2NJEDKOACTo85QQzxgheTDQaDocXW00wknXFMwEItiXp8dO 2zEml/3Kj4efDfjqGpjNefjK0cnj02Byt7y6GozWXyIylrXu0SN9qWRzUVZH3+q+ijA4q3Gm 9uWzLdpjN4QWAiiaEvMhLPohp9DdLsy3kAWWrA3+pAfHSTZXrobMMbSeBkE9E4/WxdKl0nM7 TNslAWcxkTd/7Ly9cxwT8wFdHuQB1hgCmIQxDNXHL1N1ANTeUYum1w9nUg6e1M0UWu+nk3Cw qL7oL2KZe13mQnU/CFwlhbf+i//j3SXrQLlIVQv9Fn805bxIcVo9yqUZyoiV7EUpvOsxDCZh ej3mNYF5nRCf6trEJQVk0aLC26zJAYExykdUlRqc4I13XPhlt+aFSMMkoL/thYO6e9oNFK6Q aJEKXomzxxqpceJVmPH6zvqJbOboAdE/mOD0PoS1M6saIQ== Subject: Re: Can anyone build www/node right now? Message-ID: Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2020 16:24:48 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <66e8ea52-da15-72ef-ce21-efc4d265cd3a@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="j7xusu51LyChyk6ebldeZCRb3aioGC82K" X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=10.0 tests=HELO_MISC_IP,HELO_NO_DOMAIN autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on mattapan.m5p.com X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49w2DQ64vgz3YMC X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of george@m5p.com designates 74.104.188.4 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=george@m5p.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.53 / 15.00]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:+,3:~]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.20)[multipart/signed,multipart/mixed,text/plain]; HAS_ATTACHMENT(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.97)[-0.974]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+a]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.16)[-0.162]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[m5p.com]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; SIGNED_PGP(-2.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.99)[-0.991]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; ASN(0.00)[asn:701, ipnet:74.104.0.0/16, country:US]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[freebsd] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2020 20:25:12 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --j7xusu51LyChyk6ebldeZCRb3aioGC82K Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="myI96bmHlUu69Sfru26Wu9mhsIVDBYf5b"; protected-headers="v1" From: George Mitchell To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: Subject: Re: Can anyone build www/node right now? References: <66e8ea52-da15-72ef-ce21-efc4d265cd3a@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <66e8ea52-da15-72ef-ce21-efc4d265cd3a@FreeBSD.org> --myI96bmHlUu69Sfru26Wu9mhsIVDBYf5b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2020-06-28 16:07, DutchDaemon - FreeBSD Forums Administrator wrote: > [...] > Traceback (most recent call last): >=20 > =C2=A0 File "tools/genv8constants.py", line 23, in >=20 > =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 bufsize=3D-1, stdout=3Dsubprocess.PIPE, text=3DTrue)= =2Estdout >=20 > TypeError: __init__() got an unexpected keyword argument 'text' > [...] You appear not to have a recent enough version of Python installed. The "text" keyword argument to the Popen constructor was added in Python 3.7, and it isn't available at all in Python 2. The patch file patch-tools_genv8constants.py in /usr/ports/www/node/files explicitly adds a "text" keyword argument to the call to Popen. Can you check your default version of Python? www/node/Makefile specifies it USES=3Dpython:build, which should probably be changed to python3 given the patch. -- George --myI96bmHlUu69Sfru26Wu9mhsIVDBYf5b-- --j7xusu51LyChyk6ebldeZCRb3aioGC82K Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEENdM4ZHktsJW5kKZXwRES3m+p4fkFAl74/JYACgkQwRES3m+p 4fkKuw/8DOzYjE+0CdRwEt7cgslLkipG+NHquklJWM1LzNRpjUz5ULQ1PZXCokaB Tq3P/2VbFg/ASQGsua0q/fdUXgLThcfeqW0V9N1hUlDdV5P9p4E0Rg1Z6YkoYLQy 2F5JReTnTYDP6e9FHHS+EYOC4VEK/aW9GLdSySKdRnUQvgBCEKwObH1aDqmk5G8b PFRj+4SFyNBHIdPFbNTL07QCZ6MygLrOm5F2sayTSth99h8I+wPgC3mA1XgOGpze Xz8XYFSvPg/c1GM2zFFh33JnUmvEHxDBSfgLj0Sbyrlr2Sfl5ONauWH7WNu0pH+I CDcqT70Au3xEvtw6dCxLN+K0gs8slKueGCDiHLXzwAjFuIGVe9K/bxCY5KeZ1M7a waWj439dfqaOlTLANCYfILuCzUwQBuBi26P/7GxUDSTn8HFR2EH+SwVTloFts7IU 9DQ8SvVAvPWZCRq2NbDSxUPzuN+RIbyQTtBiukOQw4VyexymqTCqZstfVGBLEekx dqF5RdZz53ZaP473Jhqd8SBKDfpwQdngfZVfwNvT14kX43qk1gYfgK+a3Iy58HjJ Rx7uN2HZEkKzTOtYB/Zfu5x0CDCfo2Hz9XON/jl8edxXgQsXWf7vciIyE/EBmR3t TirOxEeNujJlNqQgC6zBLlI+5lod5npZw9eUbSUpOYyvwQqBhC0= =P3t4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --j7xusu51LyChyk6ebldeZCRb3aioGC82K-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Jun 28 20:37:13 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D9C03549E0 for ; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 20:37:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dutchdaemon@freebsd.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [96.47.72.83]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49w2VK3dYcz3Z1H; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 20:37:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dutchdaemon@freebsd.org) Received: from [10.255.0.6] (ansible.tepucom.nl [91.190.105.24]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: dutchdaemon/mail) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CB77D2F28F; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 20:37:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dutchdaemon@freebsd.org) From: "Dutch Daemon - FreeBSD Forums Administrator" To: George Mitchell , Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2020 22:37:10 +0200 Message-ID: <172fca5e4f0.2790.b36d34a15fda208b80f54b6ad54d9e04@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: References: <66e8ea52-da15-72ef-ce21-efc4d265cd3a@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: AquaMail/1.25.0-1628 (build: 102500003) Subject: Re: Can anyone build www/node right now? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.33 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2020 20:37:13 -0000 On June 28, 2020 22:25:31 George Mitchell wrote: > On 2020-06-28 16:07, DutchDaemon - FreeBSD Forums Administrator wrote: >> [...] >> Traceback (most recent call last): >> >> File "tools/genv8constants.py", line 23, in >> >> bufsize=-1, stdout=subprocess.PIPE, text=True).stdout >> >> TypeError: __init__() got an unexpected keyword argument 'text' >> [...] > > You appear not to have a recent enough version of Python installed. > The "text" keyword argument to the Popen constructor was added in > Python 3.7, and it isn't available at all in Python 2. The patch > file patch-tools_genv8constants.py in /usr/ports/www/node/files > explicitly adds a "text" keyword argument to the call to Popen. > Can you check your default version of Python? > > www/node/Makefile specifies it USES=python:build, which should > probably be changed to python3 given the patch. -- George In absence of a make.conf in the jail it pulled in python36-3.6.11 as the default. If node depends on 3.7, that should be declared a hard dependency. I can try it with 3.7. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Jun 28 20:49:25 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8224C354B60 for ; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 20:49:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cmt@burggraben.net) Received: from smtp.burggraben.net (smtp.burggraben.net [IPv6:2a01:4f8:140:510a::3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.burggraben.net", Issuer "Christoph Moench-Tegeder" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49w2mP0fl1z3ZSM; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 20:49:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cmt@burggraben.net) Received: from elch.exwg.net (elch.exwg.net [IPv6:2001:470:7120:1:127b:44ff:fe4f:148d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "elch.exwg.net", Issuer "Christoph Moench-Tegeder" (not verified)) by smtp.burggraben.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B9F3C0030D; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 22:49:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: by elch.exwg.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 29C68139893; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 22:49:22 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2020 22:49:22 +0200 From: Christoph Moench-Tegeder To: Dutch Daemon - FreeBSD Forums Administrator Cc: George Mitchell , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Can anyone build www/node right now? Message-ID: <20200628204922.GC2469@elch.exwg.net> References: <66e8ea52-da15-72ef-ce21-efc4d265cd3a@FreeBSD.org> <172fca5e4f0.2790.b36d34a15fda208b80f54b6ad54d9e04@freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <172fca5e4f0.2790.b36d34a15fda208b80f54b6ad54d9e04@freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.14.5 (2020-06-23) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49w2mP0fl1z3ZSM X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[freebsd]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:2a01:4f8::/29, country:DE] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2020 20:49:25 -0000 ## Dutch Daemon - FreeBSD Forums Administrator (dutchdaemon@freebsd.org): > In absence of a make.conf in the jail it pulled in python36-3.6.11 as the > default. Uhm. From your log, we see that you have a make.conf with a python version override: 95. #### /usr/local/etc/poudriere.d/testamd64-make.conf #### [...] 116. DEFAULT_VERSIONS= perl5=5.30 python=3.6 python3=3.6 php=73 apache=2.4 mysql=56 ssl=openssl The default "default python" is 3.7. Regards, Christoph -- Spare Space From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Jun 28 20:54:44 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1A49354CF5 for ; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 20:54:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from DutchDaemon@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::24b:4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49w2tX4b4Vz3ZhN for ; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 20:54:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from DutchDaemon@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [10.255.0.22] (ansible.tepucom.nl [91.190.105.24]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: dutchdaemon/mail) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 505402F514 for ; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 20:54:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from DutchDaemon@FreeBSD.org) Subject: Re: Can anyone build www/node right now? To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <66e8ea52-da15-72ef-ce21-efc4d265cd3a@FreeBSD.org> <172fca5e4f0.2790.b36d34a15fda208b80f54b6ad54d9e04@freebsd.org> <20200628204922.GC2469@elch.exwg.net> From: DutchDaemon - FreeBSD Forums Administrator Autocrypt: addr=DutchDaemon@FreeBSD.org; keydata= mQINBFzVrs4BEADBxTfsrhISlpGxuyBslg1ALG9m7fNwVR2C8i3/6j9bgbb4jXsHoGfLECwa qfVyPn6tdHYAQmbWBnTXzZy/bzUlFoCmeNZUbQ2WXvO2s9WXMblZ6nersNt7EPfBMl+1JMLr UU2/B8rA9bUkXF7Bs2OXdJsVE4N1JnIc4S6xhemSh3p+ldJAoIr2snG2fxWqM8ILtkvFpg8I k7vpS2Dy24FeRTAenG6tKGOsKs/pvPVOaPa5DrVhw8N+XlZ+fsxlABt7BjDeKl4JsO3oQibL 7ZtN0Fkrno/Oi/wYPBMPdUL9Cnz2eWGoDjTw+SltsGQsTf0L8CyjuIRzW7G8spR7ilI9cPBX LmBGszEse4GhBHxxboRgdZsgJSIgevG932f2qiL2J/NmFdfdObI5oDMTDvczSYcUssko1S9H N05SKGLj1Mi8a5w7cJ9lIZzYdcfQZJLHjwGe0BTiAGt9kWbBvdyopw0Pe95EH+gBX0PcLZHY eDDznoQEgN2tKkblNFcqbq7iTgz1ux/mXvsbQOf4yhOo+40SDU3MHY/Vi/w8pth3DF/kv+T/ 1QS134zUkl5lKeeogX+wVz8w8p6xq8YPFIP/tUaI3moxLH8tIICL4G6Tx07yyv29e84vaW7z 2GH9iype6Lphm+LwtuH5JE9omXgR+5UMHmwFRCy/HyU9IIdsoQARAQABtEREdXRjaERhZW1v biAtIEZyZWVCU0QgRm9ydW1zIEFkbWluaXN0cmF0b3IgPER1dGNoRGFlbW9uQEZyZWVCU0Qu b3JnPokCVwQTAQgAQQIbIwUJCWYBgAULCQgHAgYVCgkICwIEFgIDAQIeAQIXgBYhBPQFlL3G bv5Tua98GdEdnm9HMmuoBQJdaC6xAhkBAAoJENEdnm9HMmuolcwQAKJoShuB0IRRxH7NlfI5 rVgcSeWBlwwrS5b/Oja96gEu5BqoPq59so8rRjcmU+7Z4mC3ryZAYeDvq7/qGQ4pC9G3P9N+ 13Cg1+vqaXkmuxq6Daj+FWKE1XCNQI+dbUC4zLS2+glCujSdFw4ce75DGFlCErcJC75xbKMj swqL92C/I94vClO/DGbLIbohIEQljqB4GY42geqUgWMtr+ZKPj7yGEieVvaytu7+bV3oX0WL 9viP14lnO47mDr3YmnsqxjJXDDQet45evhZ6iGY4iWyUM1xn7LHN8CZ6GJPcwu/Od/GhG0h7 96jE49fuM51UPSnAu/NAu1megpgThyjikWJBLoGYx+WYi9ri/LzmTQWPn3m+Y/whS06ZDn7v Q2nyrmCBbM/Rk1Jj71cqsohhCJC4MbkLXquXmAaWz3/zzwnSmMN8AFL8YmLoR9WJzwSx2W8l q8kacLhm97h/qxXyZJFCoZQwd6nKJlNm2QNhXkAotbrPHKZ71OJPI7bu78Q3JjQwAVRNgqqz UQk2Ydduw1CKF6XBIhRauKKSIRxfIHBSpphXmMrIpaFeK4MH+ePslV1rD9DfFto4nDzTT8fz 7Kw1FejR5iOoi51i1SnXnttiJf9FPj6j1i7QS78zZpvdgm1S1MN+jzH3HV1x+2F+F2O0BpQM 6hyBU2BYl7xw7PKLuQINBFzVrs4BEACY/uqLL8YtKIDa1z3kg+S7IVPDTKbkCeFb7p8cUSJv Mq32kyndxWjulsZGigDoBBvj7mjqzhbUwrpvioNRytKoxF850/gxjqipcjvrQ2vawhX/VbkA LA8+Ml04iLD9Cb6k8cyODwyNq0BQpThrHTfogcSpEQ15BvHSfw4t6w9dL3bEn2G/kpzajcLO CQQH8uZRFzKL5cTcT418DkrVoqvPj+KO+5iKVrmE2ug65qjW+9frgZRfW/HJa0XTFXnfhrUS /q7JtpbJlBDmiP/yXvl75mXrOTtcGN59dXSU7Zj3AVowCmDtOqA6Ckm2TblrrW/fEeTkJ/AW qWHe+H2KNN/AdkTjxAQO63rcDNKHEquz6JfKxH5UTe0dk0xhUswbFcNfUAAwk4kKR05IiZoY 2h26p9d1Q+q5kKmp0fEW0kJO/OzPunmlqTPnZ/rw9ec7alNlMc67Zp52ggYG66fG/Jvm9RrR gthFnJYigQQDW0WzuLtYmM4LJt6FEw5mlEXYds4Ep9UqhPID4BGoNT8Zk4X9b6iNFaIRU7Mt 9qOKbAc6VD1L1gQLGiTq/l+Zvt0DL1nQXyXoGodlR4a2mtL+93lC23DW8cmzwcgFXJUV9UBo 5a6tmdnF/k5dF1BRUgjMvBYlxxnDcFx1lYdJ9EZNqpACajd7/7dGJp9/6c0xZMQVmwARAQAB iQI8BBgBCAAmFiEE9AWUvcZu/lO5r3wZ0R2eb0cya6gFAlzVrs4CGwwFCQlmAYAACgkQ0R2e b0cya6j1SQ//Qr7J5meamYGTJwmguFXu3HTNZeKVZRC6yjYqfoG5tbb/fOhPPLdfkcwIrIFO Wzx5vao+i66XmktpqTIdVaVDwIlS9yoXpEMRM1TstiK7usoNGztGYejQfRvxOVJIwgwCBnfs FApYGfD2BHm6yhiny0Kmp3wIF66Xe0GNN3eVqcKe3F9DrDl1nwcYGldD7ImsbwvCayqfGq0H 3UJRw3HwVZl0+8N/TPJ7O/aFPGOxCkRK2LNgLE93qX0RnWj1iYRAA2aFPngrufTJUjCj5ME6 dAmsS+iZKr0Swx+q/hCrHNzNeOsimARWF8yPxTE5f6qDMyXGkb1dp+IV1qbJaKBH1dUoHp2R 2Zmhubp1B9uipqJDolpEP7TwDpxRW9blOuyMuRMjcpvluqnUCIMtRW5BtKRM0/OQuwhLjFjL 0fm3KH/3h3SiS1s21mhFwbd02x3YrQUbypyEiS6V68fVsaAsi2GcL3NiePDCrcyjMwClivXi 34sMjL+GVBIFdvcgxEMii8MC0U5hnWRxG6uKlJ5jJWvuu/KmDx32GW8NpuaadxuqWloMHf/J jfFlwCm6XAyoYSTN/5rE2qtzgCIgzOGNUSRBYfnCmUD1WS8D5Cm1FDBKSUL2PZ64vyIQBX2O cQ7571C00BqMxqiTopGbh85U/jL6FWJbq2YWxftW7HF81eM= Organization: The FreeBSD Forums Message-ID: <48114b3a-caf0-d3ad-0082-32b4b18f304f@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2020 22:54:42 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200628204922.GC2469@elch.exwg.net> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="np6HFJ4vpGpkyiQuLxbIlSKCNt35ChFXL" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2020 20:54:44 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --np6HFJ4vpGpkyiQuLxbIlSKCNt35ChFXL Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="T1k9bmpXtFuxhCbGW1IVKbfMJPedeyGAf" --T1k9bmpXtFuxhCbGW1IVKbfMJPedeyGAf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Language: nl On 2020-06-28 22:49, Christoph Moench-Tegeder wrote: > ## Dutch Daemon - FreeBSD Forums Administrator (dutchdaemon@freebsd.org= ): > >> In absence of a make.conf in the jail it pulled in python36-3.6.11 as = the=20 >> default. > Uhm. From your log, we see that you have a make.conf with a python > version override: > > 95. #### /usr/local/etc/poudriere.d/testamd64-make.conf #### > [...] > 116. DEFAULT_VERSIONS=3D perl5=3D5.30 python=3D3.6 python3=3D3.6 php=3D= 73 apache=3D2.4 mysql=3D56 ssl=3Dopenssl > > The default "default python" is 3.7. Ah, it pulled in the generic /etc/make.conf., which was never there until I tested something (else) with it; forgot to remove it. I'll try Python 3.7 in all of the build jails that need www/node and remove the hard Python default. Thanks guys! --T1k9bmpXtFuxhCbGW1IVKbfMJPedeyGAf-- --np6HFJ4vpGpkyiQuLxbIlSKCNt35ChFXL Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEE9AWUvcZu/lO5r3wZ0R2eb0cya6gFAl75A5IACgkQ0R2eb0cy a6gKKA/+IFYhyNJ4N5IEMY2izSoEw+yWJp67K8UUclOpDzvh2n3/ChlHr4EPi70l IJgNDaQviLGjVlDIL70K7gdltf3fB5zkCey3BSyYI3/K73TmGQtnJOQo8OlyYrFa zcnrlwGRTxCufmjYhtUZ1hUFSw9anLlcoRK2Wn2uibTXeeIXWG6h/5hNvql2gDs4 iPOS6XaK2RIRo1eGFWrF7pAj2FZTA1zUObTOjgCKD7YNQLryL5+ppHee1SLzApiW Tn+GbTJnHBz2uicNCCMiDyH8jxEYMWlxzsIY77ipbIfUQL0ecwm9WhjBnC+yZg6n C+B3AuZLufOah3kEPCLas30W9G+Lg9VeF1gSxql7j/3KOPDzhB0UjzuUdF1tTYOs Q31tCXJu6ddmfzhvCmkUWOcyCF80sKnC6vOueFag664zXmFAzSc9RX2ZOn0VEEyJ xsfKmApJHAeAibL19cguIrKtwQRP+cRD8652e5Yvj2BJYuKPA3qC5ZHDnGI6SrO+ JzV7wnFfJQuNclXg5vXltfiX9xZCrRHrAosDW6/S/0mJu6RHy46BYBF/Y/3WSsU8 pJlh3cV/5X+meQlY4Wq0LpmiYpyJJf4W0b+m/oEIUjJzRByCvuakim3lelFqG/FU Mm/FK18H1h6LCIVU5eVSJDIvZ2G4ex8viiOxI5QmSCkSnko3eGQ= =g9Js -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --np6HFJ4vpGpkyiQuLxbIlSKCNt35ChFXL-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Jun 28 22:17:47 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8926035726C for ; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 22:17:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brandon.helsley@hotmail.com) Received: from NAM10-BN7-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bn7nam10olkn2081c.outbound.protection.outlook.com [IPv6:2a01:111:f400:7e8a::81c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.protection.outlook.com", Issuer "GlobalSign Organization Validation CA - SHA256 - G3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49w4kL0tCXz3gLm for ; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 22:17:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brandon.helsley@hotmail.com) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=ZgMlovBmM4Zr4/Y6HDjF+yoFRk5erwqjFfBk3wfH7PXagPp3Ejjl3e/ZcgEBm7gEnhkYrHCQNDsgBsrgaQVFNVfCto/Kgx+zhbqgZw/GH9EBd8ko0jBcJS/IQs6t9W3PhtTqGp5s8PvtI3erwkywgEl+mOKmUed6uSrbiL6tR8bSCgCVNLlLcdpSkXYbSBRm+8mqYOatLGuYhhGiBI5HgfVDfJxO9U6aKmeHBSkRAb5urNyjay51y46vGyFtyj8+Poc5wknTFmpECmSDHr56TvMaXl0Dk0vXidMr5pViWGI/A9Qy3eTpywBglZRqUGvl0AVi4M9STqC4en9+8Gw2hw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=3qPCZnevhYGVxmNyYegfYfV9MtgmNq9hO4IWh850QrU=; b=T6ogkebUWX+1gq5n3t96sOn0LpzPK5l/QR/e/wIw9JuqfEcUNbBpfxQW0TmDf3YWXmOAYJjapw2n8dPBAiWPT/FQxANCy9MzgI/vskxFaJsk9mDagKT0m03oqaViFcGVRT3wsGXWHE+EmqsiyqLxOANPntwmtRWtqVHTkLM1kSWoKaLUA7Ysqy/mtTAeD9OhFq6bZIts301KRfZtMO0pfxH12R7uL0m7Wwhe1OLqXADBlDcQjK2F9QWF4uyKnRhxQFzY+Oez3jn+dLn2sECub558s/sW8Kx4+ZMudFHKJRzzeli/CQUEVD7W566q3/YXfJc51S95rN155r1pYEVwnw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=none; dmarc=none; dkim=none; arc=none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hotmail.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=3qPCZnevhYGVxmNyYegfYfV9MtgmNq9hO4IWh850QrU=; b=Elzgg4Kmx6FOTtAJXlmd+JZ1r3PP9y8XO3HKYBMhN1viLvxC99w7fTMt4wNjRyZI0vnVI6++IzT2WgBPgHcoyrpVj4YX1yU8gH0EZpuKQxOwKm2uuEDoLi0w6XUqvIWFHS3Y1xJaKbhylf+sUE5OIjvWVviGIyGXMCn8f1PxVy5gD+yKS+k7i7H1q12hlmSdjnJqy7peCCGwu5pTJA4CBxIkzN38Kqp+4upIRvy0mxnPV95+cWs0ZJE86cZiaf0sTIlEvLFkbDXSLnp7+ACGcgJp2DFLi3VDSttYPV8FYTrd1M9hnv6RkdGzFznaN+fDYjG50T1xeC32Vm1xkb/DaQ== Received: from MW2NAM10FT007.eop-nam10.prod.protection.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:7e87::4c) by MW2NAM10HT170.eop-nam10.prod.protection.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:7e87::130) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3131.20; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 22:17:44 +0000 Received: from CY4PR19MB0104.namprd19.prod.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:7e87::52) by MW2NAM10FT007.mail.protection.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:7e87::62) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3131.20 via Frontend Transport; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 22:17:44 +0000 X-IncomingTopHeaderMarker: OriginalChecksum:BC248B7A7FAA96252754053A2B5AC72F95AB2C0D23F1731F5228C7F1AA710749; UpperCasedChecksum:E4B1163DCAA8377005F29E11727F226C49E5E753C717C1E265977E70AC498291; SizeAsReceived:8474; Count:45 Received: from CY4PR19MB0104.namprd19.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::3cba:126c:494b:642e]) by CY4PR19MB0104.namprd19.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::3cba:126c:494b:642e%3]) with mapi id 15.20.3131.026; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 22:17:44 +0000 Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2020 16:17:42 -0600 From: Brandon helsley To: freebsd-ports Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <> References: <> Subject: Port maintenance X-ClientProxiedBy: CY4PR13CA0091.namprd13.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:903:152::29) To CY4PR19MB0104.namprd19.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:910:7a::16) X-Microsoft-Original-Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MS-Exchange-MessageSentRepresentingType: 1 Received: from [192.168.0.39] (97.118.11.249) by CY4PR13CA0091.namprd13.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:903:152::29) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3153.12 via Frontend Transport; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 22:17:44 +0000 X-Microsoft-Original-Message-ID: X-TMN: [LXLHV9zlK1rXiThv5zwu86pfcS/uI+H5] X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email X-IncomingHeaderCount: 45 X-EOPAttributedMessage: 0 X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: 4be68d6d-71f9-40a9-5b71-08d81bb1148c X-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: MW2NAM10HT170: X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0; X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info: +uBetvU/4bsLDy+CO57UUdD30FEFsgDb/AW7h1QB+bauGet45hg+qbJmrA35rukaerWz0G6jKgWUvY9T9drsEwyAB8t04X3yhh7Hsmu7v19FkWbt5g0vHKVrNf54tB0Nobejx23qiLh1k5Y9ujSZqmuUCGp+S20akYrOLP8+MHLAInXKZAcYrU5l/su3BTAkc7oMczLpu7EgpDwSvD8rWA== X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:0; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:CY4PR19MB0104.namprd19.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFTY:; SFS:; DIR:OUT; SFP:1901; X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData: ALS0biBlecgLiSkcBE7JZR9P348KGEFGOLxDikz8vwXk7MldL+YhoikhhUSO1bHq3bp/2EWKWX1yy/MYvbyy1OfNtwq9xxlD8Ku1i6UEbNS+nbCB83+43JrcIPEpwmhqwnTahYjz9dCJUggxBUCPWA== X-OriginatorOrg: hotmail.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 4be68d6d-71f9-40a9-5b71-08d81bb1148c X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Jun 2020 22:17:44.3417 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: MW2NAM10FT007.eop-nam10.prod.protection.outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Internet X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-RMS-PersistedConsumerOrg: 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000 X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: MW2NAM10HT170 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49w4kL0tCXz3gLm X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=hotmail.com header.s=selector1 header.b=Elzgg4Km; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=hotmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of brandon.helsley@hotmail.com designates 2a01:111:f400:7e8a::81c as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=brandon.helsley@hotmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.90 / 15.00]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[hotmail.com:dkim]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.96)[-0.963]; RCVD_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[hotmail.com:s=selector1]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[hotmail.com]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a01:111:f400::/48]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.95)[-0.949]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[hotmail.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[hotmail.com,none]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.98)[-0.983]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[hotmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:8075, ipnet:2a01:111:f000::/36, country:US]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ARC_ALLOW(-1.00)[microsoft.com:s=arcselector9901:i=1] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.33 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2020 22:17:47 -0000 I'm getting started reading the porters handbook. I was wondering if I can adopt a port to practice maintaining one without the experience to keep it properly updated at first. I'm a little intimidated by contributing and not sure how best to learn the porters handbook. I guess read it multiple times? From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Jun 28 22:23:19 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AE1A357478 for ; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 22:23:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@grem.de) Received: from mail.evolve.de (mail.evolve.de [213.239.217.29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.evolve.de", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49w4rj5n08z3yBt for ; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 22:23:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@grem.de) Received: by mail.evolve.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id bd987e0f; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 22:23:14 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=grem.de; h=content-type :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to :date:cc:message-id:references:to; s=20180501; bh=y5WO3QMxza8Jfi t53UdsxIAR3Jc=; b=JLXnzhxwCBDEYy25vzynDLDow0oTqOosbAAI7M0OUYbp5Y t/u98GS0ddFhXC1dTt5zqKew3BrxQ5mnDdYm0l+uIYxxNfJCOG+o6DevwnhLvpA8 si0N62sYpnnOi4AF7llpk1CBcbdMJkJPy1Qr1tbl9Ru4gGxJwlliM735IhjGUeW2 itXb56Dt01WXW3bzRUjwOTPmI8HOGncTS3NeWiwIT0sxIyQJhPplsIyNIl0JdTaZ X+ur7krQO/u5Sa0o3qlJnLYBXDW1KXCTe/EZ/Vt6q0smADHRVXgaR0wQEQoV9Xm7 NcBFVrBFv22Ch2DKqA+IPOpkkvxdVqRbBN1KRL4A== DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=grem.de; h=content-type :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to :date:cc:message-id:references:to; q=dns; s=20180501; b=CQkzNNrV ByWpC36X5vxm2LaAzJBO8bHVT+Aahjrou1Om4fGc0xl8hdLH69ye9H6WNGcPnz/6 3+o3FXMe+6/M1uDzvxrwz4FLmkQSpichPmtsiRhD3bXrnyTYD8VJeq9DP4J1KTxT 8vXDnm3hHZ5z2de+8jmXTwz4Qwkm1R9QYmqhSFxXSsloyImULAB6UQAz5q27OWVT iKjMqt1qHl09t1W8dSnRQkIU8JzMQQibq0ZrfeCp1Rp7mGyf2KzNABIYHrsrTcez jiP4UeoMqRTjQeXaTGthOVzi50KeeffKwN9XdVaw2kSrpbRDU4EQ+rkPmXZzCJKl QOhY+2+9tQg7UQ== Received: by mail.evolve.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id f94c506e (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305:256:NO); Sun, 28 Jun 2020 22:23:12 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Subject: Re: Port maintenance From: Michael Gmelin In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2020 00:23:11 +0200 Cc: freebsd-ports Message-Id: <06D943BB-8422-4B4D-912C-7B76C61CB058@grem.de> References: To: Brandon helsley X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (17F80) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49w4rj5n08z3yBt X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=grem.de header.s=20180501 header.b=JLXnzhxw; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of freebsd@grem.de designates 213.239.217.29 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=freebsd@grem.de X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.74 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[grem.de:s=20180501]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.02)[-1.025]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:213.239.217.29/32]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[grem.de]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.97)[-0.970]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.26)[0.259]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[grem.de:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[hotmail.com]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:213.239.192.0/18, country:DE]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2020 22:23:19 -0000 > On 29. Jun 2020, at 00:18, Brandon helsley w= rote: >=20 > =EF=BB=BF >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > I'm getting started reading the porters handbook. I was wondering if I can= adopt a port to practice maintaining one without the experience to keep it p= roperly updated at first. I'm a little intimidated by contributing and not s= ure how best to learn the porters handbook. I guess read it multiple times? >=20 >=20 Just pick a port that=E2=80=99s unmaintained and that you=E2=80=99re actuall= y using yourself (ideally on a daily basis). When you do changes, make sure:= - it builds cleanly in poudriere. - it passes portlint. - you follow the porter=E2=80=99s handbook as good as you can, but without f= reaking out about it. In case you=E2=80=99re uncertain, ask questions on this mailing list. Open PRs in bugzilla or (in the beginning) reviews in phabricator. Committers will help you. Either it will work, or you will learn. No one wil= l judge you, so no worries. Cheers, Michael >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Jun 29 00:20:12 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 724FA358F2D for ; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 00:20:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dutchdaemon@freebsd.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::24b:4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49w7Rc2Qtrz41XB for ; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 00:20:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dutchdaemon@freebsd.org) Received: from [10.255.0.6] (ansible.tepucom.nl [91.190.105.24]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: dutchdaemon/mail) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DDCFE10894 for ; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 00:20:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dutchdaemon@freebsd.org) From: "Dutch Daemon - FreeBSD Forums Administrator" To: Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2020 02:20:09 +0200 Message-ID: <172fd720aa8.2790.b36d34a15fda208b80f54b6ad54d9e04@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <48114b3a-caf0-d3ad-0082-32b4b18f304f@FreeBSD.org> References: <66e8ea52-da15-72ef-ce21-efc4d265cd3a@FreeBSD.org> <172fca5e4f0.2790.b36d34a15fda208b80f54b6ad54d9e04@freebsd.org> <20200628204922.GC2469@elch.exwg.net> <48114b3a-caf0-d3ad-0082-32b4b18f304f@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: AquaMail/1.25.0-1628 (build: 102500003) Subject: Re: Can anyone build www/node right now? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.33 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2020 00:20:12 -0000 On June 28, 2020 22:54:57 DutchDaemon - FreeBSD Forums Administrator wrote: > On 2020-06-28 22:49, Christoph Moench-Tegeder wrote: >> ## Dutch Daemon - FreeBSD Forums Administrator (dutchdaemon@freebsd.org): >> >>> In absence of a make.conf in the jail it pulled in python36-3.6.11 as the >>> default. >> Uhm. From your log, we see that you have a make.conf with a python >> version override: >> >> 95. #### /usr/local/etc/poudriere.d/testamd64-make.conf #### >> [...] >> 116. DEFAULT_VERSIONS= perl5=5.30 python=3.6 python3=3.6 php=73 apache=2.4 >> mysql=56 ssl=openssl >> >> The default "default python" is 3.7. > > > Ah, it pulled in the generic /etc/make.conf., which was never there > until I tested something (else) with it; forgot to remove it. Even worse: I had had a jail with the same name before, and that one had a make.conf with Python 3.6 in it. Always clear out your test configs when you're unoriginal with your test jail names ;) > I'll try Python 3.7 in all of the build jails that need www/node and remove > the hard Python default. That did indeed fix it, thanks again. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Jun 29 07:47:58 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EC3A34182A for ; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 07:47:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mpp302@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ej1-f54.google.com (mail-ej1-f54.google.com [209.85.218.54]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49wKNF4SN3z4TMZ; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 07:47:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mpp302@gmail.com) Received: by mail-ej1-f54.google.com with SMTP id dp18so15564142ejc.8; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 00:47:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=ePQnFRBBreds2zrsgdugP7sR+hFF9YbwZb3cLAELthI=; b=RzW58NEGW8nc5AZnQGG9bD8tIbL7JU301rLxEZloe1GrYDc2DRHk+Xql2U0T3eho37 ssTTVUGTbxiH66qyz628vKU5e2bb692Dv+gyTCghizx0qGohU4TCS5GNICg+4psZvs22 QxyqAu7FndH+Nr3Gnn4Qp5HZKq33seHBTFZEsen2UUGep3IMDJW/+okhRaekIsmGmalt 7tlkO52HMaeNR7RHxOf1bgoC5KuC08zPN2UTmhID8LtSQRXYGp3HGrzK7xeANOehWE4p AGXEjqBJo/y4ZKETHvK13KoWoEJCgsyl9Kvbknja3hkWARI29DoVJFex5LKuDiY5Blgh q8hQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532viwnzacVq7nzlNO7H2Nd9uVahiNyq00RtqMd9wkHHrGKPedKf qTaE51Uc2+etjxn3mlqrbFoHfhodZYc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwfCkbwhNzCFih7/LwgAR/Bg1lbOQT23ARNZdtb6s6WdEzlU+uqar6VOTB7OlwiJx6YWJemiA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:20b4:: with SMTP id pw20mr13366524ejb.225.1593416875915; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 00:47:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2a02:8109:98c0:1bc0:5e5f:67ff:fef4:ffd8? ([2a02:8109:98c0:1bc0:5e5f:67ff:fef4:ffd8]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id lm22sm8110011ejb.109.2020.06.29.00.47.54 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 29 Jun 2020 00:47:55 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: Can anyone build www/node right now? To: Dutch Daemon - FreeBSD Forums Administrator , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <66e8ea52-da15-72ef-ce21-efc4d265cd3a@FreeBSD.org> <172fca5e4f0.2790.b36d34a15fda208b80f54b6ad54d9e04@freebsd.org> <20200628204922.GC2469@elch.exwg.net> <48114b3a-caf0-d3ad-0082-32b4b18f304f@FreeBSD.org> <172fd720aa8.2790.b36d34a15fda208b80f54b6ad54d9e04@freebsd.org> Cc: bhughes@FreeBSD.org From: Mateusz Piotrowski <0mp@FreeBSD.org> Message-ID: Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2020 09:47:51 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <172fd720aa8.2790.b36d34a15fda208b80f54b6ad54d9e04@freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49wKNF4SN3z4TMZ X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of mpp302@gmail.com designates 209.85.218.54 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=mpp302@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.71 / 15.00]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:209.85.128.0/17]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_GOOD(0.00)[209.85.218.54:from]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.84)[-0.842]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[FreeBSD.org]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.10)[0.095]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[209.85.218.54:from]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.96)[-0.965]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[0mp@FreeBSD.org,mpp302@gmail.com]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:209.85.128.0/17, country:US]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[0mp@FreeBSD.org,mpp302@gmail.com]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2020 07:47:58 -0000 Hi Bradley, do you think that we should specify the minimal required Python version in www/node? Like, USES=python:build,3.7+? Here's the context: On 6/29/20 2:20 AM, Dutch Daemon - FreeBSD Forums Administrator wrote: > On June 28, 2020 22:54:57 DutchDaemon - FreeBSD Forums Administrator wrote: > >> On 2020-06-28 22:49, Christoph Moench-Tegeder wrote: >>> ## Dutch Daemon - FreeBSD Forums Administrator (dutchdaemon@freebsd.org): >>> >>>> In absence of a make.conf in the jail it pulled in python36-3.6.11 as the >>>> default. >>> Uhm. From your log, we see that you have a make.conf with a python >>> version override: >>> >>> 95. #### /usr/local/etc/poudriere.d/testamd64-make.conf #### >>> [...] >>> 116. DEFAULT_VERSIONS= perl5=5.30 python=3.6 python3=3.6 php=73 apache=2.4 mysql=56 ssl=openssl >>> >>> The default "default python" is 3.7. >> >> >> Ah, it pulled in the generic /etc/make.conf., which was never there >> until I tested something (else) with it; forgot to remove it. > > Even worse: I had had a jail with the same name before, and that one had a make.conf with Python > 3.6 in it. Always clear out your test configs when you're unoriginal with your test jail names ;) > >> I'll try Python 3.7 in all of the build jails that need www/node and remove the hard Python default. > > That did indeed fix it, thanks again. > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Cheers, Mateusz From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Jun 29 09:07:57 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBE87343D39 for ; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 09:07:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ronald-lists@klop.ws) Received: from smtp-relay-int.realworks.nl (smtp-relay-int.realworks.nl [194.109.157.24]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49wM8X466Mz4YQN for ; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 09:07:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ronald-lists@klop.ws) Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2020 11:07:52 +0200 (CEST) From: Ronald Klop To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <172460728.22.1593421672449@localhost> Subject: committer for some mongodb ports updates? MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Realworks (514.207.ffca859ba61) Importance: Normal X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49wM8X466Mz4YQN X-Spamd-Bar: ++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of ronald-lists@klop.ws designates 194.109.157.24 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=ronald-lists@klop.ws X-Spamd-Result: default: False [2.62 / 15.00]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.72)[-0.720]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:194.109.157.0/24]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[klop.ws]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; URI_COUNT_ODD(1.00)[3]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.60)[0.598]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.54)[0.543]; HAS_X_PRIO_THREE(0.00)[3]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[194.109.157.24:from]; RCVD_COUNT_ZERO(0.00)[0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; ASN(0.00)[asn:3265, ipnet:194.109.0.0/16, country:NL]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_VERYGOOD(0.00)[194.109.157.24:from] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.33 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2020 09:07:57 -0000 Hi, Would somebody like to commit these PR's before the quarterly branch? security/vuxml mongodb issue databases/mongodb36: Update to 3.6.18 -> fixes the vuln in the previous issue databases/mongodb40: Update to 4.0.19 -> fixes pkg distribution because of wrong license definition in Makefile Regards, Ronald. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Jun 29 11:36:24 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33F5C346229 for ; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 11:36:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49wQRr0gPLz3Rld for ; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 11:36:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 1537C346227; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 11:36:24 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1501E345F07 for ; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 11:36:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49wQRq6s7Lz3RVY for ; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 11:36:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (portscout.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CEB3426C33 for ; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 11:36:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.nyi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.10]) by portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 05TBaNxr063448 for ; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 11:36:23 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 05TBaNq7063447; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 11:36:23 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <202006291136.05TBaNq7063447@portscout.nyi.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.nyi.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2020 11:36:23 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2020 11:36:24 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ lang/snobol4 | 2.0 | 2.1.3 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ multimedia/shotcut | 20.04.12 | v20.06.28 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Reported by: portscout! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Jun 29 16:58:32 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DADB34E5ED for ; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 16:58:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@freebsd.org) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49wYbW6Y2hz44BD for ; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 16:58:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@freebsd.org) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.92.3 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1jpx6p-000Emq-ID; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 18:58:19 +0200 Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2020 18:58:19 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Ronald Klop Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: committer for some mongodb ports updates? Message-ID: <20200629165819.GX39563@home.opsec.eu> References: <172460728.22.1593421672449@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <172460728.22.1593421672449@localhost> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49wYbW6Y2hz44BD X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.00 / 15.00]; local_wl_from(0.00)[freebsd.org]; ASN(0.00)[asn:12502, ipnet:2001:14f8::/32, country:DE] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2020 16:58:32 -0000 Hi! > Would somebody like to commit these PR's before the quarterly branch? > > security/vuxml mongodb issue done. > databases/mongodb36: Update to 3.6.18 -> fixes the vuln in the previous issue > > databases/mongodb40: Update to 4.0.19 -> fixes pkg distribution because of wrong license definition in Makefile Testbuilds@work -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 Now what ? From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Jun 29 18:22:50 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2BD2351D33 for ; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 18:22:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@freebsd.org) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49wbSp5f5mz4C7Q for ; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 18:22:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@freebsd.org) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.92.3 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1jpyQX-000GDE-5a; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 20:22:45 +0200 Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2020 20:22:45 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Ronald Klop , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: committer for some mongodb ports updates? Message-ID: <20200629182245.GY39563@home.opsec.eu> References: <172460728.22.1593421672449@localhost> <20200629165819.GX39563@home.opsec.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200629165819.GX39563@home.opsec.eu> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49wbSp5f5mz4C7Q X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.00 / 15.00]; local_wl_from(0.00)[freebsd.org]; ASN(0.00)[asn:12502, ipnet:2001:14f8::/32, country:DE] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2020 18:22:50 -0000 Hi! > > databases/mongodb36: Update to 3.6.18 -> fixes the vuln in the previous issue > > > > databases/mongodb40: Update to 4.0.19 -> fixes pkg distribution because of wrong license definition in Makefile > > Testbuilds@work Done. Also: mongodb40-tools 8-} -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 Now what ? From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Jun 29 20:43:34 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4A9D355016 for ; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 20:43:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49wfbB5HYZz4P8B for ; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 20:43:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id B571E355015; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 20:43:34 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B434C354FA6 for ; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 20:43:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [96.47.72.83]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49wfbB3ygpz4P1w; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 20:43:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (static-71-168-218-4.cmdnnj.fios.verizon.net [71.168.218.4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: jkim/mail) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5D1A31A3A1; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 20:43:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org) Subject: Re: mail/filtermail fails to build with 13.0-CURRENT To: Dimitry Andric , Mike Clarke Cc: ports@freebsd.org References: <11067123.Fl8HKFhtjO@curlew> From: Jung-uk Kim Autocrypt: addr=jkim@FreeBSD.org; keydata= mQENBFJBztUBCAChqNyGqmFuNo0U7MBzsD+q/G6Cv0l7LGVrOAsgh34M8wIWhD+tztDWMVfn AhxNDd0ceCj2bYOe67sTQxAScEcbt2FfvPOLp9MEXb9qohZj172Gwkk7dnhOhZZKhVGVZKM4 NcsuBDUzgf4f3Vdzj4wg6WlqplnTZo8lPE4hZWvZHoFIyunPTJWenybeV1xnxK7JkUdSvQR0 fA59RfTTECMwTrSEfYGUnxIDBraxJ7Ecs/0hGQ7sljIj8WBvlRDU5fU1xfF35aw56T8POQRq F4E6RVJW3YGuTpSwgtGZOTfygcLRhAiq3dFC3JNLaTVTpM8PjOinJyt9AU6RoITGOKwDABEB AAG0Hkp1bmctdWsgS2ltIDxqa2ltQEZyZWVCU0Qub3JnPokBPQQTAQoAJwUCUkHO1QIbAwUJ E0/POwULCQgHAwUVCgkICwUWAgMBAAIeAQIXgAAKCRB8n5Ym/NvxRqyzB/wL7QtsIpeGfGIA ZPMtgXMucM3NWzomyQMln2j2efUkDKthzh9jBxgF53TjOr7imwIt0PT2k1bqctPrq5IRqnu9 mGroqaCLE3LG2/E3jEaao4k9PO6efwlioyivUo5NrqIQOQ4k3EAXw7d2y0Dk1VpTgdMrnUAB hj7lGlLqS4ydcrf24DdbCRGdEQwqd9DBeBgbWynxAJMgbZBhYVEyIHuQKkJ8qY0ibIPXXuF0 KYDeH0qUHtWV2K3srNyPtymUkBQD84Pl1GWRYx05XdUHDmnX0JV3lg0BfYJZgZv0ehPQrMfY Fd9abTkf9FHQYz1JtsC8wUuRgqElRd6+YAGf8Tt9uQENBFJBztUBCADLtSrP44El2VoJmH14 OFrlOgxzZnbn+Y/Gf1k12mJBiR+A+pBeRLD50p7AiTrjHRxO3cHcl9Dh0uf1VSbXgp8Or0ye iP/86fZPd4k5HXNmDTLL0HecPE08SCqGZ0W8vllQrokB1QxxRUB+fFMPJyMCjDAZ7P9fFTOS dTw1bJSTtOD8Sx8MpZUa9ti06bXFlVYDlaqSdgk181SSx+ZbSKkQR8CIMARlHwiLsa3Z9q9O EJr20HPyxe0AlTvwvFndH61hg7ds63eRvglwRnNON28VXO/lvKXq7Br/CiiyhFdKfINIx2Z5 htYq22tgGTW7mBURbIKoECFBTX9Lv6BXz6w9ABEBAAGJASUEGAEKAA8FAlJBztUCGwwFCRNP zzsACgkQfJ+WJvzb8UZcJQf+IsTCxUEqY7W/pT84sMg5/QD3s6ufTRncvq14fEOxCNq1Rf4Q 9P+tOFa8GZfKDGB2BFGIrW7uT5mlmKdK1vO6ZIA930y5kUsnCmBUEBJkE2ciSQk01aB/1o62 Q3Gk/F6BwtNY9OXiqF7AcAo+K/BMIaqb26QKeh+IIgK1NN9dQiq3ByTbl4zpGZa6MmsnnRTu mzGKt2nkz7vBzH6+hZp1OzGZikgjjhYWVFoJo1dvf/rv4obs0ZJEqFPQs/1Qa1dbkKBv6odB XJpPH0ssOluTY24d1XxTiKTwmWvHeQkOKRAIfD7VTtF4TesoZYkf7hsh3e3VwXhptSLFnEOi WwYofg== Organization: FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <3232f358-c678-d236-b69c-8d5fdaee5298@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2020 16:43:28 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2020 20:43:34 -0000 On 20. 6. 27., Dimitry Andric wrote: > On 27 Jun 2020, at 17:56, Mike Clarke wrote: >> As someone with very little experience with C++ I'd welcome advice on how to fix this for 13.0- >> CURRENT. It builds without problem on 12.1-RELEASE > ... >> rcfile.ll:151:14: error: no viable overloaded '=' >> yyin = new ifstream (sub_file.c_str ()); >> ~~~~ ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > This appears to be caused by a recent update to contrib/flex from 2.5.37 (7 years old) to 2.6.4, in r362333, where upstream changed yyin and yyout from pointers to references: > > https://github.com/westes/flex/commit/336a1deaa57975f34cd732d656d1c0cbe3d5233a > > Unfortunately this can break existing .ll files. They will have to be patched, but this is made more difficult by having the new version of flex in 13-CURRENT. I just checked the upstream and it seems the problem does not exist any more after this commit. https://sourceforge.net/p/mailfilter/code/ci/52e08609da8133e2cc0acd1961ebc1e1537f0c54 Most applications should have similar fixes because all major Linux distros are using Flex 2.6 now. If you are maintaining such applications, you should update the ports, add devel/flex to BUILD_DEPENDS, and set FLEX=${LOCALBASE}/bin/flex for releng/stable branches. In fact, I've waited long enough (3.5 years) to not break existing ports. I thought we should be fine by now but I guess I was wrong. :-( Please let me know if you need any help. Jung-uk Kim From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Jun 29 20:48:59 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7251354EF6 for ; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 20:48:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49wfjR4zTlz4PdB for ; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 20:48:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id A929D354EF4; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 20:48:59 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8F353550D6 for ; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 20:48:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::24b:4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49wfjR436Nz4PRt; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 20:48:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (static-71-168-218-4.cmdnnj.fios.verizon.net [71.168.218.4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: jkim/mail) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5DB751A22D; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 20:48:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org) Subject: Re: mail/filtermail fails to build with 13.0-CURRENT From: Jung-uk Kim To: Dimitry Andric , Mike Clarke Cc: ports@freebsd.org References: <11067123.Fl8HKFhtjO@curlew> <3232f358-c678-d236-b69c-8d5fdaee5298@FreeBSD.org> Autocrypt: addr=jkim@FreeBSD.org; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= mQENBFJBztUBCAChqNyGqmFuNo0U7MBzsD+q/G6Cv0l7LGVrOAsgh34M8wIWhD+tztDWMVfn AhxNDd0ceCj2bYOe67sTQxAScEcbt2FfvPOLp9MEXb9qohZj172Gwkk7dnhOhZZKhVGVZKM4 NcsuBDUzgf4f3Vdzj4wg6WlqplnTZo8lPE4hZWvZHoFIyunPTJWenybeV1xnxK7JkUdSvQR0 fA59RfTTECMwTrSEfYGUnxIDBraxJ7Ecs/0hGQ7sljIj8WBvlRDU5fU1xfF35aw56T8POQRq F4E6RVJW3YGuTpSwgtGZOTfygcLRhAiq3dFC3JNLaTVTpM8PjOinJyt9AU6RoITGOKwDABEB AAG0Hkp1bmctdWsgS2ltIDxqa2ltQEZyZWVCU0Qub3JnPokBPQQTAQoAJwUCUkHO1QIbAwUJ E0/POwULCQgHAwUVCgkICwUWAgMBAAIeAQIXgAAKCRB8n5Ym/NvxRqyzB/wL7QtsIpeGfGIA ZPMtgXMucM3NWzomyQMln2j2efUkDKthzh9jBxgF53TjOr7imwIt0PT2k1bqctPrq5IRqnu9 mGroqaCLE3LG2/E3jEaao4k9PO6efwlioyivUo5NrqIQOQ4k3EAXw7d2y0Dk1VpTgdMrnUAB hj7lGlLqS4ydcrf24DdbCRGdEQwqd9DBeBgbWynxAJMgbZBhYVEyIHuQKkJ8qY0ibIPXXuF0 KYDeH0qUHtWV2K3srNyPtymUkBQD84Pl1GWRYx05XdUHDmnX0JV3lg0BfYJZgZv0ehPQrMfY Fd9abTkf9FHQYz1JtsC8wUuRgqElRd6+YAGf8Tt9uQENBFJBztUBCADLtSrP44El2VoJmH14 OFrlOgxzZnbn+Y/Gf1k12mJBiR+A+pBeRLD50p7AiTrjHRxO3cHcl9Dh0uf1VSbXgp8Or0ye iP/86fZPd4k5HXNmDTLL0HecPE08SCqGZ0W8vllQrokB1QxxRUB+fFMPJyMCjDAZ7P9fFTOS dTw1bJSTtOD8Sx8MpZUa9ti06bXFlVYDlaqSdgk181SSx+ZbSKkQR8CIMARlHwiLsa3Z9q9O EJr20HPyxe0AlTvwvFndH61hg7ds63eRvglwRnNON28VXO/lvKXq7Br/CiiyhFdKfINIx2Z5 htYq22tgGTW7mBURbIKoECFBTX9Lv6BXz6w9ABEBAAGJASUEGAEKAA8FAlJBztUCGwwFCRNP zzsACgkQfJ+WJvzb8UZcJQf+IsTCxUEqY7W/pT84sMg5/QD3s6ufTRncvq14fEOxCNq1Rf4Q 9P+tOFa8GZfKDGB2BFGIrW7uT5mlmKdK1vO6ZIA930y5kUsnCmBUEBJkE2ciSQk01aB/1o62 Q3Gk/F6BwtNY9OXiqF7AcAo+K/BMIaqb26QKeh+IIgK1NN9dQiq3ByTbl4zpGZa6MmsnnRTu mzGKt2nkz7vBzH6+hZp1OzGZikgjjhYWVFoJo1dvf/rv4obs0ZJEqFPQs/1Qa1dbkKBv6odB XJpPH0ssOluTY24d1XxTiKTwmWvHeQkOKRAIfD7VTtF4TesoZYkf7hsh3e3VwXhptSLFnEOi WwYofg== Message-ID: <1684823c-eccf-6bfe-33f9-359bd0de3784@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2020 16:48:56 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <3232f358-c678-d236-b69c-8d5fdaee5298@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2020 20:48:59 -0000 On 20. 6. 29., Jung-uk Kim wrote: > On 20. 6. 27., Dimitry Andric wrote: >> On 27 Jun 2020, at 17:56, Mike Clarke >> wrote: >>> As someone with very little experience with C++ I'd welcome >>> advice on how to fix this for 13.0- CURRENT. It builds without >>> problem on 12.1-RELEASE >> ... >>> rcfile.ll:151:14: error: no viable overloaded '=' yyin = new >>> ifstream (sub_file.c_str ()); ~~~~ ^ >>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> >> This appears to be caused by a recent update to contrib/flex >> from 2.5.37 (7 years old) to 2.6.4, in r362333, where upstream >> changed yyin and yyout from pointers to references: >> >> https://github.com/westes/flex/commit/336a1deaa57975f34cd732d656d1c0cbe3d5233a >> >> >> >> Unfortunately this can break existing .ll files. They will have to be patched, but this is made more difficult by having the new version of flex in 13-CURRENT. > > I just checked the upstream and it seems the problem does not > exist any more after this commit. > > https://sourceforge.net/p/mailfilter/code/ci/52e08609da8133e2cc0acd1961ebc1e1537f0c54 > > > Most applications should have similar fixes because all major > Linux distros are using Flex 2.6 now. If you are maintaining such > applications, you should update the ports, add devel/flex to ^^^^^^^^^^ Sorry, I meant textproc/flex. Jung-uk Kim > BUILD_DEPENDS, and set FLEX=${LOCALBASE}/bin/flex for releng/stable > branches. > > In fact, I've waited long enough (3.5 years) to not break existing > ports. I thought we should be fine by now but I guess I was > wrong. :-( > > Please let me know if you need any help. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Jun 29 21:20:24 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D951C355F81 for ; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 21:20:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brandon.helsley@hotmail.com) Received: from NAM04-SN1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-sn1nam04olkn0805.outbound.protection.outlook.com [IPv6:2a01:111:f400:fe4c::805]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.protection.outlook.com", Issuer "GlobalSign Organization Validation CA - SHA256 - G3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49wgPh0dXrz4Rq9 for ; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 21:20:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brandon.helsley@hotmail.com) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=OWSkksKvSBvj+IfP8fmEIHQmeZUieCRqWqd2oH/ZcbMVhexiy7YBHzuvrBi20i/8eFREfP4Cq6ghrD9sWsn93R5CxFmA4MaXO1yqgTv5c4X1Kq4LtR+Py/4T2mJh4GWPq+nVB9D6EkUaxGWhEcMZlkZulZn1oR//XapSljEjkKQdhZ2/BVjwuJTFqIplkBY6ZlbWzVdbkr+pRx7HPmaMrWksdfrH1K63cGW6QO5lTLRErusJNYTwuJiXFXzj39ctQt+R6BgIzs8d+q0M9MVyOVX+RRjTha/FxcVDGXrvIrTqtRamjjaWlJGfEQ73O90ImvRdERJHoiZhmP7bBTxvqg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=Mu4t284wf9JTKTUWsMBn4LLUWr56BYDANWAFocUf2uY=; b=YGkBoYZgtXATmKMQiRMlvUtx0zJv5PzW8FkgLEmLRt15/3Gud7HJsC4VFPGyuC2WknYXzkCvry5VcuTlgM1SHc6GCO3MlCGgwiB7sgkhtghHRB0UnQkL9xIPCHeLM3sbQlhl9WcrCVeVia4w3lb7+m3OQppi7gMh6d7EEjABR6eYVXqVPRLr/lKnA4ulD64plO93lER01VNFwMoq3Chi+uSlDZd11ZCQH8NO6t0iD0oYiEzQPUFZ1bJQifX3w7G/9H7iIzB3X8WvJmk/H9fjkINKKzN1nvkNFExXMTEDS1goc4Q6bnJAC0QT4WMLB8kVxLsIMbrCAeEe8dQKjMUDpg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=none; dmarc=none; dkim=none; arc=none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hotmail.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=Mu4t284wf9JTKTUWsMBn4LLUWr56BYDANWAFocUf2uY=; b=XJAEFMqj4Awh6MxdSNA59ExirDJXDzz2Pk7buiDq6Yt5Zg8zRg33JHzFWvmJ0JTC7ilRS7wRvgiPBD80zJETc3/6LpqU9hKbzVIBwtf2YqSP5GuO7ZQp1eep+PqGp/hI23hMCopZo1OMOyv50cSEF77wV+sUs5fO1tFOUHaUhjrcq8RhAGqvsFNE0vboLmjhbq63zqXXcy0WEZTgdt9ugYdCOqZC5j4TvALvrCB+t+HiyWPKlQ1TukWLwiAkC5ctu34HFSks2pHG5C8bSxGtzxutBuLg3tpSLLAoCZKBrQuZ4boClg1IprW4+qVOJQQ5U7zTAQp49leZzzl7cvktFQ== Received: from SN1NAM04FT050.eop-NAM04.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.88.52) by SN1NAM04HT205.eop-NAM04.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.89.89) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3109.22; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 21:20:21 +0000 Received: from CY4PR19MB0104.namprd19.prod.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:7e4c::53) by SN1NAM04FT050.mail.protection.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:7e4c::413) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3131.20 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 21:20:20 +0000 X-IncomingTopHeaderMarker: OriginalChecksum:80F0503C311DDC28BCAA48A2525278671B3CDA5DB6461A293EB83916E54C18DD; UpperCasedChecksum:3C0C5A34186660DA3FBF345E47DBCD7B2FB1853E58042FEBAF84B7E794322E5D; SizeAsReceived:8752; Count:46 Received: from CY4PR19MB0104.namprd19.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::3cba:126c:494b:642e]) by CY4PR19MB0104.namprd19.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::3cba:126c:494b:642e%3]) with mapi id 15.20.3131.027; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 21:20:20 +0000 Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2020 15:20:19 -0600 From: Brandon helsley To: Michael Gmelin Cc: freebsd-ports Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: Re: Port maintenance X-ClientProxiedBy: CY4PR15CA0002.namprd15.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:910:14::12) To CY4PR19MB0104.namprd19.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:910:7a::16) X-Microsoft-Original-Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MS-Exchange-MessageSentRepresentingType: 1 Received: from [192.168.0.39] (97.118.11.249) by CY4PR15CA0002.namprd15.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:910:14::12) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3131.20 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 21:20:20 +0000 X-Microsoft-Original-Message-ID: X-TMN: [1urhFVG2zfBAWQYL/yosu9MonB9qJ9EE] X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email X-IncomingHeaderCount: 46 X-EOPAttributedMessage: 0 X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: 767bb2b5-48fe-459a-eb1c-08d81c723a84 X-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: SN1NAM04HT205: X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0; X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info: Mb8cn00v4jcPnFwPxbwkYid/QmNxUSoti6nCAY0cWC7hfX6kY4pvkEHHu3M0UjDhGF0L+lbBnj6t39x6Ugx46paBOnhVNDRFY9FJHjvdQS2SIuGJMpDmMwN5Bfbq1ciuSctDV+9HyFNk3gMygEzXL0ijXW82BPM4qPUe1TidM2RDnSPIRn+Meu/8ne9q1LNUL5VZzvmuFXuap4HeMtk5Mpt490jGp29yP4YPjhk3yBkaUpqGQx22ZK2QXiB0bkaL X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:0; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:CY4PR19MB0104.namprd19.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFTY:; SFS:; DIR:OUT; SFP:1901; X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData: tMiFbu43U9HysQIWnosl9+TKGCMrGVUsrAJJHXhEmMVFq699NWU9XbztVC2LmNAkKhnjhvGx0rNlfKgQ3lIhb1knFUuZ0nHX6dZ5LaVs+xZ9r9cFMvcvodehomzOkDDcWpOxRkOUgFbeQFavP/+TzA== X-OriginatorOrg: hotmail.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 767bb2b5-48fe-459a-eb1c-08d81c723a84 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 29 Jun 2020 21:20:20.8972 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Internet X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-RMS-PersistedConsumerOrg: 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000 X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: SN1NAM04HT205 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49wgPh0dXrz4Rq9 X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=hotmail.com header.s=selector1 header.b=XJAEFMqj; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=hotmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of brandon.helsley@hotmail.com designates 2a01:111:f400:fe4c::805 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=brandon.helsley@hotmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.41 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.05)[-1.051]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[hotmail.com:s=selector1]; RCVD_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[hotmail.com]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a01:111:f400::/48]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.97)[-0.972]; ARC_ALLOW(-1.00)[microsoft.com:s=arcselector9901:i=1]; URI_COUNT_ODD(1.00)[7]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[hotmail.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[hotmail.com,none]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.39)[-1.386]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[hotmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:8075, ipnet:2a01:111:f000::/36, country:US]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[hotmail.com:dkim] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.33 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2020 21:20:24 -0000 =20 =20 =20 =20 Okay, I use the nvidia 390 driver and nvidia-xsettings, but they both hav= e no maintainer. I read all the material about what the responsibilitys a= re for a maintainer and I think I can do a couple. I got a message from p= ortscout about a couple of ports that needed updated. I didn't sign up fo= r any yet but could start there. How do I set my email address to maintai= ner=3F I will begin soon after I reread the documentation for contributin= g to ports and maybe ask a few more questions as they arise. =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 > =20 > On Jun 28, 2020 at 4:23y PM, Michael Gmelin wr= ote: > =20 > =20 > > On 29. Jun 2020, at 00:18, Brandon helsley wrote: > > =EF=BB=BF > > > > > I'm getting start= ed reading the porters handbook. I was wondering if I can adopt a port to= practice maintaining one without the experience to keep it properly upda= ted at first. I'm a little intimidated by contributing and not sure how b= est to learn the porters handbook. I guess read it multiple times=3F > = > Just pick a port that=E2=80=99s unmaintained and that you=E2=80=99re = actually using yourself (ideally on a daily basis). When you do changes, = make sure: - it builds cleanly in poudriere. - it passes portlint. - you = follow the porter=E2=80=99s handbook as good as you can, but without frea= king out about it. In case you=E2=80=99re uncertain, ask questions on thi= s mailing list. Open PRs in bugzilla or (in the beginning) reviews in pha= bricator. Committers will help you. Either it will work, or you will lear= n. No one will judge you, so no worries. Cheers, Michael > > > > = > > > > =5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F= =5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F= =5F=5F=5F > freebsd-ports=40freebsd.org mailing list > https://list= s.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send an= y mail to =22freebsd-ports-unsubscribe=40freebsd.org=22 =20 > =20 From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Jun 29 21:45:00 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF7AC356518 for ; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 21:45:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@grem.de) Received: from mail.evolve.de (mail.evolve.de [213.239.217.29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.evolve.de", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49wgy343WGz4TdY; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 21:44:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@grem.de) Received: by mail.evolve.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 35801c50; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 21:44:56 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=grem.de; h=content-type :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to :cc:date:message-id:references:to; s=20180501; bh=+vvFHDgIzy1fx1 b3Pj8+IKis7tA=; b=MkSzs4rJWnaTXI0jROdcKT71m0JG+QVpf66xuLsGvXzXvc 8lWrhuvYYF2iognIhT/n93B59Uel7Vm2IajnJTbDiBubkgmvfXsKfdC/4f72TqPq hUFcwAfb7xKIxyRTC8jozhoD6yQ1cfZWuIDiVmyEe7QrczIwqzCeXa5OVTPlkv/J +iM0b2VOcNMA7G9ch8Rpm2hwPqZju0oyhbi5nIkCaTFE7udWTxwhud+4VZIJv07M V/6PfJMUrLNxYJbcYDpWRuZYOcKZXxkxnWrj99mePiC08B50IylcKecPdWJXbsYS BA3NVr4TnlRg2S171fxxAkiIIde22MDIdCfgumwA== DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=grem.de; h=content-type :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to :cc:date:message-id:references:to; q=dns; s=20180501; b=hFRtOJAL qv5vui7g82pyiLKyoWsGz8i4/Y/aKP64VrfluAcS5yh2YMRLyyBfo+uk5frNZQzJ OyKavE3B0CTol6rmtXdJpTfANyE/vI0FCtODzr7Kf+RITNDiZVp3S3T4CZ6THYUq Ljedxq5lB6xwTnk0y45mmJn1S0vLHyAOpspPL+uvqJ5SOr/fgi6z0pRIgsSlEJe1 M/1k8wtEd6nFcPuCy2lpgbFpj/N9DBJmo6q1q/IX4WxQIsr8dbI2aVC7b3CspopT ASnsCCNIvUbzqQpfZGFDgqQbEifR6Bt+cnRUzxmoGvoA6mRWBp+7Ixs01xeLZ9Xs A4/2N8+EiGP9Dw== Received: by mail.evolve.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id ee768901 (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305:256:NO); Mon, 29 Jun 2020 21:44:56 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Subject: Re: Port maintenance From: Michael Gmelin In-Reply-To: Cc: freebsd-ports , Alexey Dokuchaev Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2020 23:44:55 +0200 Message-Id: <3BD5C0C3-8F99-4443-B9F1-7F9C28312A27@grem.de> References: To: Brandon helsley X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (17F80) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49wgy343WGz4TdY X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=grem.de header.s=20180501 header.b=MkSzs4rJ; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of freebsd@grem.de designates 213.239.217.29 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=freebsd@grem.de X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.03 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[grem.de:s=20180501]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.01)[-1.013]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:213.239.217.29/32]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[grem.de]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.01)[-1.007]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[grem.de:+]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.01)[-0.009]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[hotmail.com]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:213.239.192.0/18, country:DE]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2020 21:45:00 -0000 > On 29. Jun 2020, at 23:20, Brandon helsley w= rote: >=20 > Okay, I use the nvidia 390 driver That one is already maintained by danfe@. > and nvidia-xsettings I only see nvidia-xconfig and nvidia-settings, both which have no maintainer= . > , but they both have no maintainer. I read all the material about what the= responsibilitys are for a maintainer and I think I can do a couple. I got a= message from portscout about a couple of ports that needed updated. I didn'= t sign up for any yet but could start there. How do I set my email address t= o maintainer? Assuming maintainership is done through sending in a patch in form of a PR (= the handbook describes this). I would recommend that you first open a few PRs with patches for one or two u= nmaintained ports, then, once you=E2=80=99re comfortable with the process (a= nd committers are too, especially when it comes to attention to detail), you= open a PR to take maintainership. -m From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Jun 29 21:46:11 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8686435659A for ; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 21:46:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jonc@chen.org.nz) Received: from mail-ot1-x341.google.com (mail-ot1-x341.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::341]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49wgzQ4bTpz4TnZ for ; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 21:46:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jonc@chen.org.nz) Received: by mail-ot1-x341.google.com with SMTP id d4so16836953otk.2 for ; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 14:46:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chen-org-nz.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=OdLEeE3DtAtlxgLjrYV1ZN34dVPTxfBU8gAVjc4o6Xg=; b=eKvvvVKTH68ufvHBD7KwlBzh7V8LyejxK/F6pMqcv0bizZWKc66AAzLep8ywmcdp6G aqG6aBmIbuQ3t4j4JCgdp9v8dt6UObTCRf/0fDIKKQ15P/krdFQ2f2yN85s7UEjeCg4U /oDfZVkbQ7JK43Fn7wXSJqyKT+7QN+l7zkW3RyZ8rCkD8UcCX70Mx1BvlboGXytiClFN 1IMPokEO7fcAJ2DQO/cHZSn4MCeVtH3rDiCoK2Ghor/cXpMazvAOWUnFsIIE5I5ebUkL h/vJRAbcir7WIyvB+GA2elQqrb1213rGJ/iQYFiDg3MeS/fuAPHRTTvkgqbA6P2kJ5AL +Cyw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=OdLEeE3DtAtlxgLjrYV1ZN34dVPTxfBU8gAVjc4o6Xg=; b=HrBk/U64FTsXdMkvUwNyxSf2qnivZpxDn0bu8x7/6YeFZOWyvruwlm9p+3OMSdlgf2 JQAZvHeNXvflfATX+ZjjnPESV3r3Jk4USwwg2Ggmj0HCIh9+BKsg/k5u2dPZ5+2q/i0D bNdUR0PBa+OhPDZ1j6qlRqsYZfg/JOJii8v811hxO7I+ETqhg2fPg11iOi4FHVEUBgPT GFh57llwF0hIa54PZAV/0xAWDtlPx3LzhQBvidIXORFo8JnOLEvYY4b1tlfzz0xk3xGM HtiT97SIuTdBols8MD/brjS0H5QgbiZ+qBc9U6NO6b3jqxsb8NScoC8FXPvmdUoW9jzr NyPQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5325sU44l+DAWv78HdxV86us1IgKReo9T2JNvATzWC+aHRJSnuvE S3uZPyJK24Juyb3EYjC0aCtwoNrIM52o1ppvMSgktA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJybH0pTY8Mmad4TfbzF8t+7L5hhme9Ii1LcCAgEgrKnh7KhFNkMdc50wD3OxgDxZRYndlP53Mv0APLu/CRhAPc= X-Received: by 2002:a9d:24e5:: with SMTP id z92mr16128538ota.255.1593467169017; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 14:46:09 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Jonathan Chen Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2020 09:45:53 +1200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Port maintenance To: Brandon helsley Cc: Michael Gmelin , freebsd-ports Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49wgzQ4bTpz4TnZ X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=chen-org-nz.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=eKvvvVKT; dmarc=none; spf=softfail (mx1.freebsd.org: 2607:f8b0:4864:20::341 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of jonc@chen.org.nz) smtp.mailfrom=jonc@chen.org.nz X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.82 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.83)[-0.834]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[chen-org-nz.20150623.gappssmtp.com:s=20150623]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.29)[0.291]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.98)[-0.975]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[chen.org.nz]; R_SPF_SOFTFAIL(0.00)[~all]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[chen-org-nz.20150623.gappssmtp.com:+]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::341:from]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[hotmail.com]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2020 21:46:11 -0000 On Tue, 30 Jun 2020 at 09:20, Brandon helsley wrote: > > Okay, I use the nvidia 390 driver and nvidia-xsettings, but they both hav= e no maintainer. I read all the material about what the responsibilitys are= for a maintainer and I think I can do a couple. I got a message from ports= cout about a couple of ports that needed updated. I didn't sign up for any = yet but could start there. How do I set my email address to maintainer? I w= ill begin soon after I reread the documentation for contributing to ports a= nd maybe ask a few more questions as they arise. > The usual process is to submit an update (a fix or a version-update) to the port via bugs.freebsd.org. If it has no maintainer and you're willing to adopt it, your update will also change the MAINTAINER in the Makefile. Cheers. --=20 Jonathan Chen From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Jun 30 07:50:03 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E38F3613F6 for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 07:50:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49wxNC3l56z43Wj for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 07:50:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 8041F3613F5; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 07:50:03 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F0AB3614EA for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 07:50:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49wxNC2sG4z43QW for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 07:50:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (portscout.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46FE814EBB for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 07:50:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.nyi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.10]) by portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 05U7o3ML046345 for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 07:50:03 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 05U7o3e0046344; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 07:50:03 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <202006300750.05U7o3e0046344@portscout.nyi.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.nyi.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2020 07:50:03 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2020 07:50:03 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ lang/swi-pl | 7.6.4 | 8.2.1 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Reported by: portscout! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Jun 30 12:08:47 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10D0D3487CA for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 12:08:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alexvpetrov@gmail.com) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49x36k5K3Hz4L1D for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 12:08:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alexvpetrov@gmail.com) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id B677034882D; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 12:08:46 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B63A1348762 for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 12:08:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alexvpetrov@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lj1-x22e.google.com (mail-lj1-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22e]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49x36j4fk0z4L1C; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 12:08:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alexvpetrov@gmail.com) Received: by mail-lj1-x22e.google.com with SMTP id 9so22156354ljv.5; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 05:08:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=to:cc:subject:from:autocrypt:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=sKNgFXSrOt9wWNq6wh05T8wXFdSsUjS3Rq67Feh8YCM=; b=N0th3dx7lbAYocWuYS4mKH8gTe6I7H2p7CgwlQftfGA/EaPd55SJ+334MNughEV1AE 6SW7uKWf8/PZ2BAbfe9vd6eCjFIxKIMXnnTp4GarnSWa2t6toz99eO94j/+YLCnUoY0h x4ajpa6PWGZGo2BqXO43QOshRuNK9j/V83sY8IuxNz+WZCTHh9cC4cO2gAEKVSx9hqgE IHzVA5Dx9QoTSuBMHylIcMZN9XxJ17oo/RkHQR4O/9+VXCzfTWwtgja4aNDu0xXGDjDQ +zCwzU2evwHZB8WcpmzQ9XomNa/CuNaGJyVQHMRJYXwxoCAbyKzACkARYuj1toHP0K4Z UG6w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:to:cc:subject:from:autocrypt:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=sKNgFXSrOt9wWNq6wh05T8wXFdSsUjS3Rq67Feh8YCM=; b=Zlj1/Crq1fyLWc//NXriEkJ7hh6oOSVYR0FlEteONliB2PGSAjTbBzlj7yZ8L7IDcF WpN9XNI4PDiheVmAuc8kN691gxUA9IQXNEVGO+QdipZ4rWsCTX0u6ainq2ckBBBMM2lV 2LWrsKINBQw+lw87jRqh5v4e4z591klO6uc8V8pp9GzzNQ4P6Ylz695mNprRnBTvxIS9 p2YTNm4gjNdWpa8FH2YOdGRLMdlZEvkYhA0fHecBDVFnuHCDkJy4GBpjSibNCznr7Mb3 qxjy4+2seL/4j+0VA+TJ+OgEpRIBBad6Xz37jz2nPJy6oHIQOhcpAEvtd93dYvES9hTq ghmA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531oQVgDRkLiezqw691BklCPU4lUAJpLH8+O0HjbToolaqoGiKeI VE8C0nWwdeVOfPsaRHrkVM8aJxB0 X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyCCYZ+FcJppbFK+vqPYQsB+YsDZxBp8UdjbDi43Q3kr8Q0QqR7yBU6nrDOMX4MtP/O9yXtug== X-Received: by 2002:a2e:7804:: with SMTP id t4mr10517790ljc.8.1593518923542; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 05:08:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from alex.super (stone.g-service.ru. [84.22.141.217]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id q1sm667940lji.71.2020.06.30.05.08.42 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 30 Jun 2020 05:08:42 -0700 (PDT) To: tobik@FreeBSD.org Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: FreeBSD Port: waylandpp-0.2.7 From: "Alex V. Petrov" Autocrypt: addr=alexvpetrov@gmail.com; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= mQINBFr3oA0BEADMSXiVd/IwYhJPMQ6LXbZ7jTA/RXuzrGYaR++UENx5QJ6/HJ/3myTeMnZE nNa0Zme+oKw/9s5x7rBTP6mL5ta7VSYpnPX932mAjT9J4nS7iW/wWNBqcXn7wDCog2TV8Ww3 13SUP2YaKoJKJLxddiZD6AJrkafB9EE/AycMQ8XxMao1lVS+/KAo0yciOsnSlIJCWhF00b3j xDlHLvehrDa4S3EB13bF6uE0XU5nFfMNHtBav2mwD9t01hNioCNTV1hXwmsS/L1n5PR5FyJJ yYtjeohrAUiGKGJU9lJJ6tROBhzV/k3OsOGPyajFOVsW0vUueYfgw+IAPYdOZIAONgNdxkvs tRLQxYPCBMN1FvQ7GlIhq7ob+mxuA1imXx3xzlYy5tu4QzB383qZtLqQnZpysjYooAbHl+eN vB2ldvH9TZxm3fxxNL6zgYAXE/pNgFoqg/ILmhDwvvHzApHqVCKU3g6yii0KPxD7susaUWcL JYgrmt2BIE0RuiQRGWyS0L277D/YGmVnPNHxPi58DBs2iexDm7jw7PhlmfOw44N9w+O09D2S gqmBHySAtsq9Z5LoM81F+LrOoVmpYczZWErS917Gua1X7K3wrXoqQC8qcSiHZpEcBl/Uohii QWzjQJot5LT7rvfFHpnSOXAKgN7enVM7KxTJAYK1U343GGdepQARAQABtDZBbGV4VlBldHJv diAoZmlyc3QgZ2xvYmFsIGtleSkgPGFsZXh2cGV0cm92QGdtYWlsLmNvbT6JAk4EEwEIADgW IQRvKPTT2TJuh37ANx313p8aVpVkcAUCWvegDQIbAwULCQgHAgYVCgkICwIEFgIDAQIeAQIX gAAKCRD13p8aVpVkcLLeEADClYAElEInGGjtLfH4jdjvTDaQTsrwT5/1E5/h8yxI4yn7hCt1 Dh+iCSUNLdPO88nZV2jP8bMQXFBKSbC0nAJXd8O+8t9AfSWoUC6IMzncxKTK/jZuJTCToCUR XZ+47+uJaBp51rpw3pFX8UrFlYSF6Dz97dI2cGHfx3xAOnowKxyHfthxS8waKWgbMOceds78 BP2+Q0iLCpoC9rO4KDc+w+h8z21eHIE9VHadTHpnKVF82voPH8XWvznTOCpYrdBwUtIyD/DV XRb0xcFsOSkvmReYX7u4QuOPLSc86sEWh4hXTFLAOdfeTjrDTDmBcmFpltmW1j+5t4mI1dK8 gptREM8gMJVJw3jjcO6jADeXX9q5C8/lX0sEGz9uC4oU5nkOMyfzd9Anb+9bCs7pMxhqAKjA 8tqJPPkmJU8WzMCs+uudIiQ8W9qIETwUJWxizQ3kvlzLfWRz5n93Y9kzSmjw81aiIJK/HFY8 wsW5zNo6JBn57cMPx8nBC4E2zM09ffmqSpjDwXfvZF2IIR8L4VTiKi3ovwLglJP+Qbs5HXNn 6K40cPNqfnHzPLwXwd/co04B/VVr+cKZuE58kYGty9Xs9q/SEpObDnxnLxMNHUNJJuRgOiti TKDkteHuKm6NA8v05o3TDQ5HU9szEoE5uoi/3pQ1ktfA/K3LkDwbotXL+7kCDQRa96ANARAA w5+/xcaCP6iwsi2CFQ4pAWksdmPBEHA2VPn1ym3C6opjbyWUp6sn25eTWppdhA9rUqbM/zV/ hAFRT67oZJKBYNRaMoDdO8BsVZsg/u76QF/GuhbUjIk0tFFdpddMXl0zKAJJMCfDRxURRWv7 NW6sY/EZ4Dal5s4xOT+UrWGag3qoaIRdzw5bJRP+o75L90cE8pd7+Pd9cVJOOtTAwx0E4bPq dPSa6CPDSvzd9D3mw37dPzXysyQkQTy0OM7255E2wjYz3RbJxB3utybPVN3XJBD5EyA8IYeS ic1/03UrkRNv4XrLnlg7xLv96ZeCrf/BDNQW23iVwbISUAk4TXL7xs2TGYOmowZ89mMEcbfW ChX3YLAuAeWzgpMcrDC00izOxG0spkkrHL7/i1iSu2MKhv5qMTVgchlSktdd+KTba5keleHv ULQ3feGUKf9eTkKgES6q4rKrae0tIwByTLhhDVbkXqR6v8zrpJSscrvJ3tMNgquJKy5ATIUB nvUE2hMkSwtnJ2vQ/Z0zGt6c5KxI57/hsb148tXp1v3gAq9d6i8c8ChxSR/kUlqAvzl2QGcn CFVN6nfOzyNfBPZ61abNzkzjzyhOK4Gq4gQvx4QXhDp3jEME7rPM0Tqf0venb1Dp7SIHwggV yJglGApwoUvD4kKNIC7KDr+s/UjbBp4ExFMAEQEAAYkCNgQYAQgAIBYhBG8o9NPZMm6HfsA3 HfXenxpWlWRwBQJa96ANAhsMAAoJEPXenxpWlWRwAaEQAKm0imG5Fm37JZi+5faXJv/ZLZGl r4TVg4u1kMktdTQRrTXa3Qs0i3wTtOZe1p3xCCzPx+97iYETHragDTdAFUO+v+Llin26L1Zl z4huyIqgGSuTuekQfn6eoMZbcF+wzah4j/mvXQVpJBF2qQi1YdHSapWDlweuiuk01y8C3eHv 3qfFB/OJwXhwj0HKhkGkB2dLXuLtIk4GCXh4/g22tWz/SB0gsSXU7WhJFb0CyxETGR9YKxM8 CNl5tVRLqsBC6yQLvcAJgJci73PfMiHKnjxrz//+0xQO1TPeruWsd8nLYvziT38CyX42Mbaj 01WpvB0qOeTGtwGFmyyrnE8fYpd3CE0uAl9BnHqafAabl9+09x3wf+lEkkO2bK59akZz3BPU 8Lz2BAgskyS81WZCthQYUrUozFEx/31x8JJ95EQFNW9t8HBa51r4QhedSNKxLbT3Sx8hH0iq Z8wYkGw0og9U1DqgFzxE2HSGZSDG3I1DrPDqhcM/6Y0V98wS+XreuS88DYYck37+L7bTGiyZ WYFNZk1ChcIBk8hgKn5nFOCWO2rX06RI9zorzSpEg6lB2STae1Up5oEj8QqfYmfO3cp2Qhvj F3c2/i8KpWkJQkAgNrv428FIlx9SiPu9gvNTTYuLIOdZLQvInTmKs2uCoB6JDAW75axDhBbR FvM3Vpv/ Message-ID: Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2020 19:08:41 +0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: ru Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49x36j4fk0z4L1C X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=N0th3dx7; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of alexvpetrov@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4864:20::22e as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=alexvpetrov@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.11 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.01)[-1.011]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a00:1450:4000::/36:c]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.99)[-0.991]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2a00:1450:4864:20::22e:from]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.11)[-0.110]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2a00:1450::/32, country:US]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com:dkim] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2020 12:08:47 -0000 Wrong depence? ===> Configuring for waylandpp-0.2.8 ===> Performing out-of-source build /bin/mkdir -p /usr/ports/graphics/waylandpp/work/.build ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libjsoncpp.so.22" not found, required by "cmake" *** Error code 1 In system present libjsoncpp.so.24 only -- ----- Alex. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Jun 30 12:18:05 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BAEE348A71 for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 12:18:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tobik@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49x3KT3cZdz4LX9 for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 12:18:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tobik@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 7C12B348D1D; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 12:18:05 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BDEE348A70 for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 12:18:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tobik@FreeBSD.org) Received: from forward4-smtp.messagingengine.com (forward4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.238]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49x3KT1RJNz4LCY; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 12:18:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tobik@FreeBSD.org) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailforward.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80A7719406CA; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 08:18:04 -0400 (EDT) Received: from imap1 ([10.202.2.51]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 30 Jun 2020 08:18:04 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=90M104 igTDimLN7+0EH/Q2gsxBnmwo7H6kTmmm5Ite8=; b=Uzc4Vv5F738GDHkzN9SrJc 61SkS9NwE1EMA2jmDH9CRa9b2AjVpzzGVKQ6lxPuEWiMhM9hfwR3YxIKqZsjf4b2 gR2kiK/PkBrfk8xgBkUTgnR1k6M26nt1U7dYsW/aGbeYUfqMRz44ZQ021hwWHmYV zoiNpIwtcgDeI9TcXRB9+bha6mbFYkueEi4+CKY7PMx6ZC4om+fzuehPMndT7QBL gYiO7Oxm+mSgMnoDCOk2jeAKFqua3o+sNtrHSh6Z+bdVL41jL2NVi3oqnFN9kBOg +Go6mb1i5dhELsvlzkKBxBQTW6Bcv4NhH4iX5O7p+6x4Qk+n55na9V+YyIHBdQYQ == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduiedrtddtgddvudcutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefofgggkfgjfhffhffvufgtsehttdertderredtnecuhfhrohhmpedfvfhosghi rghsucfmohhrthhkrghmphdfuceothhosghikheshfhrvggvuefuffdrohhrgheqnecugg ftrfgrthhtvghrnhepgfehgedvffegudefleefteekhefhfefhhfeggfdtjefggedvgeei keejhfetheegnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrh homhepthhosghikheshfhrvggvuefuffdrohhrgh X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 383B5C200A5; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 08:18:04 -0400 (EDT) X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.3.0-dev0-576-gfe2cd66-fm-20200629.001-gfe2cd668 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2020 12:17:36 +0000 From: "Tobias Kortkamp" To: "Alex V. Petrov" Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, "Yuri Victorovich" Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: waylandpp-0.2.7 Content-Type: text/plain X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49x3KT1RJNz4LCY X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.00 / 15.00]; local_wl_from(0.00)[FreeBSD.org]; ASN(0.00)[asn:11403, ipnet:66.111.4.0/24, country:US] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2020 12:18:05 -0000 On Tue, Jun 30, 2020, at 12:08, Alex V. Petrov wrote: > Wrong depence? > > ===> Configuring for waylandpp-0.2.8 > > ===> Performing out-of-source build > > /bin/mkdir -p /usr/ports/graphics/waylandpp/work/.build > > ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libjsoncpp.so.22" not found, required by > "cmake" > > *** Error code 1 > > In system present libjsoncpp.so.24 only This is not an issue in graphics/waylandpp. Rebuild all devel/jsoncpp consumers (here at least devel/cmake). The update in r540853 was incomplete and PORTREVISION of jsoncpp consumers should have been bumped after the soname change to prevent issues like this. CCing the responsible committer. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Jun 30 13:41:57 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9D8534B82A for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 13:41:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ronald-lists@klop.ws) Received: from smtp-relay-int.realworks.nl (smtp-relay-int.realworks.nl [194.109.157.24]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49x5BD2yRKz4RGK; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 13:41:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ronald-lists@klop.ws) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2020 15:41:52 +0200 (CEST) From: Ronald Klop To: Kurt Jaeger Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <93046110.2.1593524512253@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20200629182245.GY39563@home.opsec.eu> References: <172460728.22.1593421672449@localhost> <20200629165819.GX39563@home.opsec.eu> <20200629182245.GY39563@home.opsec.eu> Subject: Re: committer for some mongodb ports updates? MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Realworks (514.221.7532f6727ac) Importance: Normal X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49x5BD2yRKz4RGK X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of ronald-lists@klop.ws designates 194.109.157.24 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=ronald-lists@klop.ws X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.76 / 15.00]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.70)[-0.702]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:194.109.157.0/24]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[klop.ws]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.99)[-0.989]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.27)[-0.269]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; HAS_X_PRIO_THREE(0.00)[3]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[194.109.157.24:from]; RCVD_COUNT_ZERO(0.00)[0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; ASN(0.00)[asn:3265, ipnet:194.109.0.0/16, country:NL]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_VERYGOOD(0.00)[194.109.157.24:from] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.33 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2020 13:41:57 -0000 Van: Kurt Jaeger Datum: maandag, 29 juni 2020 20:22 Aan: Ronald Klop , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Onderwerp: Re: committer for some mongodb ports updates? > > Hi! > > > > databases/mongodb36: Update to 3.6.18 -> fixes the vuln in the previous issue > > > > > > databases/mongodb40: Update to 4.0.19 -> fixes pkg distribution because of wrong license definition in Makefile > > > > Testbuilds@work > > Done. Also: mongodb40-tools 8-} > > -- > pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 Now what ? Thank you! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Jun 30 16:37:20 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC0AA350362 for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 16:37:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: from mail-oi1-x22d.google.com (mail-oi1-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::22d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49x94c03Q7z4fCM for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 16:37:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: by mail-oi1-x22d.google.com with SMTP id t4so184977oij.9 for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 09:37:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=VNT1aff0lYPrALYE4n4NXRPTcVSvSPyf1AfK/E4LNG8=; b=V0w0gPHXVGVxJ7P0ngRNcYsYe0cPI3YKmA61ettciQN22D8uT4DVwHkGSVyIZADVol HtpY400YbuuVF/oIPdZe17mLTPjP4nXVUWgfI9Uv/M57pfe1lZv58/pVRZCkhmFTZN++ pTf6m1nWx1mRG+xvYnZNhE1y0k6CVhTyKd7Mu7F8ztPUUFCcMRs/TlkqvhweSAa46DP8 Kn3oXiflStKaZs1C7JEvuAUsv2l2sW3dr4b3gsVwapW6OJ0+nLzRjdKKzYR45fh9trsO y7UNe/TkCHAHmy9ytJla4Fbb+zvomHG5vjYnMFX3B+JZGnOcPx9HSA0ky0YYX8uZTGKD Jj/Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=VNT1aff0lYPrALYE4n4NXRPTcVSvSPyf1AfK/E4LNG8=; b=FGDPbIwgEshLc3m7r//yxoS32TqDSxJUos+/VnOcOq+ubJXE0JfPhiHcB+iVyW/EiH TgN+tKKaeEFyQ26ed7VU88wAd1admoY+Yk2qfaPW5AxbJOhndvQp8SjJqFhIafTQ0AgJ 341R6zA/tqgeDbot3ogRHXKEj/cJtQ1j2X9wzmkG7X/XrMwiokdQM8PWCIrm2Q0hrpL3 hAx5M/olxMyvY5ZHtjb1oyRmzg1saKndw76JZ7CyJxzHgj6wTjuCiNSmFfyeUaHso/lk oVi10V6m8gOzqsDVoBTBFCh3b/u6xxrLtiZmzRHCEdBXfyXYs33f7bTJ0a9M04BNx8h2 DCuA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530ydy4WYxSCDLaaP7/qK6HZJPaR2FkJsDxhpK3t5KodFX6Awn7j iPUGeNeiRGeo5SlxL9sZMKceGwZXt3qP9yZNaLutKza/ X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw/GaBau7YCbIdOaEagZf49I0ErTRY9Tofc4+v80OkKvx9Dd9BHnBpOiTx1ZfZuepFDLPSbCDuWex/t2W4hjPU= X-Received: by 2002:aca:efc1:: with SMTP id n184mr17038176oih.133.1593535038387; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 09:37:18 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Kevin Oberman Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2020 09:37:01 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: jsoncpp update breaks cmake To: FreeBSD Ports ML X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49x94c03Q7z4fCM X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=V0w0gPHX; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of kob6558@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::22d as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=kob6558@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.52 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com:dkim]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36:c]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.02)[-1.017]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::22d:from]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.20)[0.201]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[rkoberman@gmail.com,kob6558@gmail.com]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[rkoberman@gmail.com,kob6558@gmail.com]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.33 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2020 16:37:20 -0000 The update to jsoncpp pumped the version of the .so which requires a rebuild of cmake. This prevents building a LOT of ports. Could someone bump the PORT_REVISION for cmake? I have not checked whether other ports may need a bump, as well. -- Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer E-mail: rkoberman@gmail.com PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683 From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Jul 1 08:13:11 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4381366F1E for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2020 08:13:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49xYrR5nFqz45qK for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2020 08:13:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id C63EB366B65; Wed, 1 Jul 2020 08:13:11 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C602F366CA8 for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2020 08:13:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49xYrR4yXSz45bt for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2020 08:13:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (portscout.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F3B6261C6 for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2020 08:13:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.nyi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.10]) by portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 0618DBF0015107 for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2020 08:13:11 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 0618DBTb015106; Wed, 1 Jul 2020 08:13:11 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <202007010813.0618DBTb015106@portscout.nyi.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.nyi.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2020 08:13:11 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2020 08:13:12 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ science/afni | 20.1.17 | afni_20.1.18 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ security/teleport | 4.2.10 | v4.2.11 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Reported by: portscout! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Jul 1 11:16:32 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F86034BB60 for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2020 11:16:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from trashcan@ellael.org) Received: from mx1.enfer-du-nord.net (mx1.enfer-du-nord.net [IPv6:2001:41d0:302:1100::e:1def]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49xdvz1Z1fz4K6Y; Wed, 1 Jul 2020 11:16:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from trashcan@ellael.org) From: Michael Grimm X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.102.3 at mail.enfer-du-nord.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.80.23.2.2\)) Subject: Recent wordpress, huge compiling effort, needed? Message-Id: <163574FC-6199-45C2-9462-4997B5BE618C@ellael.org> Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2020 13:16:12 +0200 Cc: "joneum@freebsd.org" To: FreeBSD Ports ML X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.23.2.2) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49xdvz1Z1fz4K6Y X-Spamd-Bar: ++++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of trashcan@ellael.org has no SPF policy when checking 2001:41d0:302:1100::e:1def) smtp.mailfrom=trashcan@ellael.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [4.53 / 15.00]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_SOME(0.00)[]; SUBJECT_ENDS_SPACES(0.50)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[ellael.org]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.68)[0.676]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.09)[0.093]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.86)[0.861]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; RCVD_COUNT_ZERO(0.00)[0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:16276, ipnet:2001:41d0::/32, country:FR]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2020 11:16:32 -0000 Hi I am running 12.1-STABLE (r362720), ports (head, revison 540950) and = poudriere-devel for ports compilations. The recent update of www/wordpress ended in a compilation 'nightmare', = because this port newly depends on ImageMagick: MWN> cat diff-wordpress=20 2c2 < # $FreeBSD: head/www/wordpress/Makefile 534850 2020-05-10 13:51:37Z = joneum $ --- > # $FreeBSD: head/www/wordpress/Makefile 540837 2020-06-29 22:24:46Z = joneum $ 5c5 < DISTVERSION=3D 5.3.3 --- > DISTVERSION=3D 5.4.2 20c20,21 < USE_PHP=3D curl ftp gd hash json mysqli pcre tokenizer xml zip zlib --- > USE_PHP=3D curl exif fileinfo ftp gd hash json mysqli pcre = tokenizer xml zip zlib > RUN_DEPENDS=3D = ${LOCALBASE}/lib/php/${PHP_EXT_DIR}/imagick.so:graphics/pecl-imagick@${PHP= _FLAVOR} Due to this dependeny the following ports need tp be compiled: devel/llvm80 devel/gobject-introspection graphics/ImageMagick6-nox11 graphics/cairo graphics/mesa-libs graphics/pecl-imagick=20 net/avahi-app=20 print/cups=20 print/ghostscript9-agpl-base=20 print/harfbuzz=20 print/libraqm (BTW: llvm80 runs into an error after 2.5 hours compilation time) Here is my questions: 1) Why does one need this dependency? 2) I could compile and install the updated port by removing RUN_DEPENDS = within a couple of minutes.=20 Is this a safe approach, though? 3) If 2) is a safe way to use wordpress remotely from a web browser, = then would it possible to remove the dependency by an option? (CC'd this = mail to maintainer) Thanks and regards, Michael From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Jul 1 11:41:40 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AC9034C793 for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2020 11:41:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@opsec.eu) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49xfSz0qlHz4Kmf; Wed, 1 Jul 2020 11:41:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@opsec.eu) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.92.3 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1jqb7G-000AO7-AL; Wed, 01 Jul 2020 13:41:26 +0200 Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2020 13:41:26 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Michael Grimm Cc: FreeBSD Ports ML , "joneum@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Recent wordpress, huge compiling effort, needed? Message-ID: <20200701114126.GA39563@home.opsec.eu> References: <163574FC-6199-45C2-9462-4997B5BE618C@ellael.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <163574FC-6199-45C2-9462-4997B5BE618C@ellael.org> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49xfSz0qlHz4Kmf X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of pi@opsec.eu designates 2001:14f8:200::1 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=pi@opsec.eu X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.06 / 15.00]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_SOME(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.98)[-0.975]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[opsec.eu]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.99)[-0.988]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.80)[-0.798]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; ASN(0.00)[asn:12502, ipnet:2001:14f8::/32, country:DE] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2020 11:41:40 -0000 Hi! > The recent update of www/wordpress ended in a compilation 'nightmare', because this port newly depends on ImageMagick: [...] > 1) Why does one need this dependency? The wordpress install script checks if imagemagick is available, and I'm not sure it's still optional. Does your blog do lots of picture resizings etc ? > 2) I could compile and install the updated port by removing RUN_DEPENDS within a couple of minutes. > Is this a safe approach, though? Mostly, if you do not do fancy image work. > 3) If 2) is a safe way to use wordpress remotely from a web browser, then would it possible to remove the dependency by an option? (CC'd this mail to maintainer) Give it a try to use wordpress without that RUN_DEPENDS. If it can be installed without it, and you don't need it... -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 Now what ? From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Jul 1 11:52:36 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8BB534C84D for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2020 11:52:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from trashcan@ellael.org) Received: from mx2.enfer-du-nord.net (mx2.enfer-du-nord.net [IPv6:2001:41d0:401:2100::5:8a0e]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49xfjc0Mm3z4LVp; Wed, 1 Jul 2020 11:52:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from trashcan@ellael.org) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.102.3 at mail.enfer-du-nord.net Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.80.23.2.2\)) Subject: Re: Recent wordpress, huge compiling effort, needed? From: Michael Grimm In-Reply-To: <20200701114126.GA39563@home.opsec.eu> Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2020 13:52:24 +0200 Cc: "joneum@freebsd.org" , Kurt Jaeger Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <0C563705-178B-414C-A866-8F556081C815@ellael.org> References: <163574FC-6199-45C2-9462-4997B5BE618C@ellael.org> <20200701114126.GA39563@home.opsec.eu> To: FreeBSD Ports ML X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.23.2.2) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49xfjc0Mm3z4LVp X-Spamd-Bar: +++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of trashcan@ellael.org has no SPF policy when checking 2001:41d0:401:2100::5:8a0e) smtp.mailfrom=trashcan@ellael.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [3.42 / 15.00]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_SOME(0.00)[]; SUBJECT_ENDS_SPACES(0.50)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[ellael.org]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.63)[0.627]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.53)[-0.528]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.42)[0.420]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; RCVD_COUNT_ZERO(0.00)[0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:16276, ipnet:2001:41d0::/32, country:FR]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2020 11:52:36 -0000 Kurt Jaeger wrote: >> The recent update of www/wordpress ended in a compilation = 'nightmare', because this port newly depends on ImageMagick: > [...] >> 1) Why does one need this dependency? >=20 > The wordpress install script checks if imagemagick is available, and > I'm not sure it's still optional. The only option available currently is whether to build/install the = documentation > Does your blog do lots of picture resizings etc ? No. I am running a rather static website, only. No blog. >> 3) If 2) is a safe way to use wordpress remotely from a web browser, = then would it possible to remove the dependency by an option? (CC'd this = mail to maintainer) >=20 > Give it a try to use wordpress without that RUN_DEPENDS. If it > can be installed without it, and you don't need it... I did install it successfully, already, and everything is working as = usual. But I wonder if this might break something I didn't run about my = tests a couple of minutes ago. Regards, Michael From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Jul 1 12:12:16 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8768E34E1EF for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2020 12:12:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andyf@andyit.com.au) Received: from alpine.spintel.net.au (alpine.spintel.net.au [IPv6:2407:e400:1::b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49xg8G21Y0z4NNH for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2020 12:12:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andyf@andyit.com.au) Received: from drunkfish.andyit.com.au (210-1-210-40-cpe.spintel.net.au [210.1.210.40]) by alpine.spintel.net.au (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F0D084C0ACB for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2020 22:11:58 +1000 (AEST) Received: from [172.22.2.15] (tosh2.andyit.com.au [172.22.2.15]) by drunkfish.andyit.com.au (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 061CBvnf067494 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2020 22:11:58 +1000 (AEST) (envelope-from andyf@andyit.com.au) To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: Andy Farkas Subject: audoi/openal-soft fails Message-ID: <8745d952-10d0-b6b1-bdca-9c9b5181de35@andyit.com.au> Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2020 22:11:53 +1000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49xg8G21Y0z4NNH X-Spamd-Bar: +++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of andyf@andyit.com.au has no SPF policy when checking 2407:e400:1::b) smtp.mailfrom=andyf@andyit.com.au X-Spamd-Result: default: False [3.70 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.94)[0.940]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[andyit.com.au]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.88)[0.879]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.98)[0.977]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:18390, ipnet:2407:e400::/32, country:AU]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2020 12:12:16 -0000 # portmaster audio/openal-soft ... CMake Warning (dev) at /usr/local/share/cmake/Modules/FindPackageHandleStandardArgs.cmake:272 (message):   The package name passed to `find_package_handle_standard_args` (OPENSL)   does not match the name of the calling package (OpenSL).  This can lead to   problems in calling code that expects `find_package` result variables   (e.g., `_FOUND`) to follow a certain pattern. Call Stack (most recent call first):   cmake/FindOpenSL.cmake:56 (find_package_handle_standard_args)   CMakeLists.txt:1000 (FIND_PACKAGE) This warning is for project developers.  Use -Wno-dev to suppress it. ... CMake Warning (dev) at /usr/local/share/cmake/Modules/FindPackageHandleStandardArgs.cmake:272 (message):   The package name passed to `find_package_handle_standard_args` (MYSOFA)   does not match the name of the calling package (MySOFA).  This can lead to   problems in calling code that expects `find_package` result variables   (e.g., `_FOUND`) to follow a certain pattern. Call Stack (most recent call first):   cmake/FindMySOFA.cmake:59 (find_package_handle_standard_args)   CMakeLists.txt:1387 (find_package) This warning is for project developers.  Use -Wno-dev to suppress it. ... -- Found MYSOFA: /usr/local/lib/libmysofa.so -- Building utility programs -- Building configuration program -- -- Building test programs -- -- Configuring incomplete, errors occurred! See also "/usr/ports/audio/openal-soft/work/.build/CMakeFiles/CMakeOutput.log". See also "/usr/ports/audio/openal-soft/work/.build/CMakeFiles/CMakeError.log". *** Error code 1 Stop. make[1]: stopped in /usr/ports/audio/openal-soft *** Error code 1 Stop. make: stopped in /usr/ports/audio/openal-soft ===>>> make build failed for audio/openal-soft ===>>> Aborting update ===>>> You can restart from the point of failure with this command line:        portmaster audio/openal-soft This command has been saved to ~/portmasterfail.txt -andyf From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Jul 1 14:52:34 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC8483541C5 for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2020 14:52:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk) Received: from p3plwbeout23-06.prod.phx3.secureserver.net (p3plsmtp23-06-2.prod.phx3.secureserver.net [68.178.252.172]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "wbeout.secureserver.net", Issuer "Starfield Secure Certificate Authority - G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49xkjF4n5sz4b92 for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2020 14:52:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk) Received: from outmx-028.london.gridhost.co.uk ([95.142.156.253]) by :WBEOUT: with ESMTP id qe5fjr6nH2ciTqe5gj8z7s; Wed, 01 Jul 2020 07:52:00 -0700 X-CMAE-Analysis: v=2.3 cv=HqgI5HbS c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=0sP6G7xXiiOFqQt3g3kR8w==:117 a=aH6JTgnnTGHwN2iBTwNb8w==:17 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=_RQrkK6FrEwA:10 a=FP58Ms26AAAA:8 a=D7rCoLxHAAAA:8 a=Y6tQvzwkv5rDGeEbAhEA:9 a=LSsvPGevoEk93w0P:21 a=K85mI8bwbCY37Zh-:21 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=P3xHhOtoK6rroZ9zpUER:22 X-SECURESERVER-ACCT: X-SID: qe5fjr6nH2ciT Received: from curlew.milibyte.co.uk (unknown [82.71.56.121]) (Authenticated sender: mailpool@milibyte.co.uk) by outmx-028.london.gridhost.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 230BE221B18C6 for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2020 15:51:59 +0100 (BST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=curlew.localnet) by curlew.milibyte.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.93.0.4) (envelope-from ) id 1jqe5e-0004XG-Ns for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Wed, 01 Jul 2020 15:51:58 +0100 From: Mike Clarke To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mail/filtermail fails to build with 13.0-CURRENT Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2020 15:51:58 +0100 Message-ID: <4967304.2cGJQEq9Kv@curlew> In-Reply-To: <3232f358-c678-d236-b69c-8d5fdaee5298@FreeBSD.org> References: <11067123.Fl8HKFhtjO@curlew> <3232f358-c678-d236-b69c-8d5fdaee5298@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TSO-Authenticated: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on curlew.milibyte.co.uk); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfM2f3zI+iTfQd6EHepOGnDaHY3PCJ30dHaNQNV9X/P/FgRQb+veEezyycPmZccE4wymlFXLWummmLQE8Oy/UFtn65p4sXV0lwE3Olkovdg1c87Uy/Plz oUOzO71rQaSomyJPS4upuy7fQUeQKKgMCofaa8LRbs/Fuicovkx8KfjePuaxnHDHBDAMPONnE1xbueLFNv5onSmLp1OTzuz3dwQ= X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49xkjF4n5sz4b92 X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk designates 68.178.252.172 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.43 / 15.00]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:68.178.252.0/24]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.95)[-0.951]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.24)[-0.238]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[68.178.252.172:from]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.94)[-0.938]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[milibyte.co.uk]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; CTE_CASE(0.50)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:26496, ipnet:68.178.252.0/22, country:US]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[68.178.252.172:from] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2020 14:52:34 -0000 On Monday, 29 June 2020 21:43:28 BST Jung-uk Kim wrote: > I just checked the upstream and it seems the problem does not exist any > more after this commit. > > https://sourceforge.net/p/mailfilter/code/ci/52e08609da8133e2cc0acd1961ebc1 > e1537f0c54 > > Most applications should have similar fixes because all major Linux > distros are using Flex 2.6 now. If you are maintaining such > applications, you should update the ports, add devel/flex to > BUILD_DEPENDS, and set FLEX=${LOCALBASE}/bin/flex for releng/stable > branches. Thanks Jung-uk Kim, your info got me moving along the right track. I've patched the port to upgrade it to 0.8.6 and incorporated your suggestions about devel/flex for releng/stable. I also needed to conditionally add CPPFLAGS+= -I${LOCALBASE}/include/flex to prevent flex 2.5.37 from the rev 12 base system from being used. With these changes filtermail 0.8.6 now builds and works on both 12.1-RELEASE and 13.0-CURRENT but before I go ahead and submit a patch there's a point I'm a bit concerned about. I've successfully followed all the steps for testing the port in section 3.4 of the Porter's Handbook except for the final step, make package (as user), which failed. Initially it was because I did not have write access to the port directory. After temporarily running chmod a+w filtermail I was able to build the package but the final step of copying it to /usr/ports/packages/ All/filtermail-0.8.6.txz not surprisingly failed. I'm puzzled why there is this requirement to be able to build as a user when the default permissions on the ports directories prevent this for unprivileged users. I'm fairly confident that my patches to the port are working OK but this is a task I rarely get involved with so I've appended the Makefile to this email in case anybody can spot anything I've not done correctly. I made the dependency of textproc/flex conditional on OSVERSION < 1300000. I suppose that will only be correct if flex was in base from the start of 13.0- CURRENT, if not is there a more specific value I should test against? # $FreeBSD: head/mail/filtermail/Makefile 436247 2017-03-15 14:45:30Z mat $ PORTNAME= filtermail PORTVERSION= 0.8.6 CATEGORIES= mail MASTER_SITES= http://sourceforge.net/projects/mailfilter/files/Mailfilter/ DISTNAME= mailfilter-${PORTVERSION} MAINTAINER= jmc-filtermail@milibyte.co.uk COMMENT= Filter mail on a POP3 server: saves downloading spam LICENSE= GPLv3 .include .if ${OPSYS} == FreeBSD && ${OSVERSION} < 1300000 BUILD_DEPENDS= ${LOCALBASE}/bin/flex:textproc/flex .endif USES= bison gmake ssl # This port is filtermail, but the author called it mailfilter. To avoid a # clash with another port called mailfilter, we change all files # installed by this port from the form *mailfilter* to the form # *filtermail*, and similarly the names in the man pages. EXTRACT_CMD= ${GZIP_CMD} EXTRACT_BEFORE_ARGS= -dc EXTRACT_AFTER_ARGS= | ${SED} 's/[mM][aA][iI][lL][fF][iI][lL][tT][eE][rR]/ filtermail/g' | ${TAR} -xf - WRKSRC= ${WRKDIR}/${PORTNAME}-${PORTVERSION} GNU_CONFIGURE= yes MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE= yes CPPFLAGS+= -I${LOCALBASE}/include .if ${OPSYS} == FreeBSD && ${OSVERSION} < 1300000 CPPFLAGS+= -I${LOCALBASE}/include/flex FLEX=${LOCALBASE}/bin/flex .endif LDFLAGS+= -L${LOCALBASE}/lib PLIST_FILES= bin/${PORTNAME} \ man/man1/${PORTNAME}.1.gz \ man/man5/${PORTNAME}ex.5.gz \ man/man5/${PORTNAME}rc.5.gz post-patch: @${REINPLACE_CMD} -e 's|filtermail.sourceforge| mailfilter.sourceforge|g' ${WRKSRC}/README post-extract: @${RM} ${WRKSRC}/src/getopt.h .include -- Mike Clarke From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Jul 1 15:15:15 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB539354C19 for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2020 15:15:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from news@mips.inka.de) Received: from mail.inka.de (mail.inka.de [IPv6:2a04:c9c7:0:1073:217:a4ff:fe3b:e77c]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49xlCQ4WWkz4cjB for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2020 15:15:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from news@mips.inka.de) Received: from mips.inka.de (news@[127.0.0.1]) by mail.inka.de with uucp (rmailwrap 0.5) id 1jqeS2-00A6Jn-FQ; Wed, 01 Jul 2020 17:15:06 +0200 Received: from lorvorc.mips.inka.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lorvorc.mips.inka.de (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 061FE31c096124 for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2020 17:14:03 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from news@lorvorc.mips.inka.de) Received: (from news@localhost) by lorvorc.mips.inka.de (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 061FE2Ll096120 for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Wed, 1 Jul 2020 17:14:02 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from news) To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: Christian Weisgerber Newsgroups: list.freebsd.ports Subject: Reminder: freedb.org (CDDB) has shut down Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2020 15:14:02 -0000 (UTC) Message-ID: User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (FreeBSD) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49xlCQ4WWkz4cjB X-Spamd-Bar: +++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of news@mips.inka.de has no SPF policy when checking 2a04:c9c7:0:1073:217:a4ff:fe3b:e77c) smtp.mailfrom=news@mips.inka.de X-Spamd-Result: default: False [3.13 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.16)[0.165]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[inka.de]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.80)[0.795]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.97)[0.974]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[naddy@mips.inka.de,news@mips.inka.de]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:202113, ipnet:2a04:c9c7::/32, country:DE]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[naddy@mips.inka.de,news@mips.inka.de] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2020 15:15:15 -0000 I would like to remind everybody that the freedb.org compact disc track database has shut down. Any program funcionality that tries to fetch from or submit data to it is broken now. This will mostly concern CD rippers and media players. A mostly drop-in compatible alternative is available at gnudb.org. https://www.gnudb.org/ I expect a number of FreeBSD ports to be affected by this. If you are the maintainer of a port that has CDDB functionality, please fix it by switching the default server over to gnudb.org. (On OpenBSD I extracted all ports and grepped over the sources, which revealed some 35 affected ports. https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports&m=159346807907595&w=2 I don't have the resources to do this on FreeBSD.) -- Christian "naddy" Weisgerber naddy@mips.inka.de From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Jul 1 15:49:00 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE3163557D8 for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2020 15:49:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kremels@kreme.com) Received: from mail.covisp.net (mail.covisp.net [65.121.55.42]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49xlyM1HhCz4gFv for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2020 15:48:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kremels@kreme.com) From: "@lbutlr" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Reminder: freedb.org (CDDB) has shut down Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2020 09:48:56 -0600 References: To: FreeBSD In-Reply-To: Message-Id: <7D0E7FDC-C32C-41CE-A991-99CEC3C84BF5@kreme.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3645.0.6.2.3) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49xlyM1HhCz4gFv X-Spamd-Bar: + Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of kremels@kreme.com designates 65.121.55.42 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=kremels@kreme.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [1.37 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; MISSING_MIME_VERSION(2.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[kreme.com]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.04)[0.037]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.23)[-0.235]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.03)[-0.033]; RCVD_COUNT_ZERO(0.00)[0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:209, ipnet:65.112.0.0/12, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[65.121.55.42:from] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2020 15:49:00 -0000 On 01 Jul 2020, at 09:14, Christian Weisgerber wrote: > (On OpenBSD I extracted all ports and grepped over the sources, which > revealed some 35 affected ports. > https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports&m=159346807907595&w=2 > I don't have the resources to do this on FreeBSD.) I did a quick and dirty check on FreeBSD 12.1 x86 grep -ir CDDB /usr/ports/INDEX-12 | wc -l 154 (133 of them are libcddb) HTH? -- "Are you pondering what I'm pondering?" "Sure, Brain, but how are we going to find chapsour size?" From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Jul 2 07:23:14 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9ABF34BA0B for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2020 07:23:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49y8hL476pz4RBr for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2020 07:23:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 8D98234B831; Thu, 2 Jul 2020 07:23:14 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D57F34B91D for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2020 07:23:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49y8hL3G11z4RBq for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2020 07:23:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (portscout.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 53A9616DE6 for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2020 07:23:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.nyi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.10]) by portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 0627NEEZ058844 for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2020 07:23:14 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 0627NEM5058843; Thu, 2 Jul 2020 07:23:14 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <202007020723.0627NEM5058843@portscout.nyi.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.nyi.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2020 07:23:14 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2020 07:23:14 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ graphics/xaos | 4.0 | release-4.1 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ net-mgmt/netdata | 1.23.0 | v1.23.1 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Reported by: portscout! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Jul 2 18:13:30 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE9BE35CE49 for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2020 18:13:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from timp87@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ej1-x629.google.com (mail-ej1-x629.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::629]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49yR6f0f1nz48bn for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2020 18:13:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from timp87@gmail.com) Received: by mail-ej1-x629.google.com with SMTP id l12so30809092ejn.10 for ; Thu, 02 Jul 2020 11:13:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=7KyxB3uodJJCf7J7aLjBnFFir7pQBgE1OCvyBMw/0hs=; b=b7ER3sU5vFoAru8srmsm9g6x+DRaI/zo1fQOVIQczN+uYHSWPsuOyLuPewzkWHkiYh oD6V0m7iW8Js74mmeyb3u9esKZ0yrqz1+T+5RA/1gqpAJXwYsP/mQSDO9T3A7wyZN8ow bLoeF5aTIwcUSTEsmPGS1Do2DBgktuaQgUZ6WdPD45UhXrCJ+9WVFKAB+cYwy4Z6/yRZ ncTKPKTzfDARKBHzQ5VMagZ+Wp+pPrcaRGuXTGa3d3Wq7CWZg6CfITKXAo9iSUUGDJLQ xlC/gIYzxc05rGS146CiWkuWVu+NejQDY1TRoRjzPFKnCiFACqSyn2YlYDcCvUJJrqUE zG3A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=7KyxB3uodJJCf7J7aLjBnFFir7pQBgE1OCvyBMw/0hs=; b=Qaj7PLe9TxRrDcHndZKPyumOrsruLO/U9yXUOIzquxGkzw6yakeuMEgVf+u4PNCXt9 EM4QKFspB4xq4O8ds6dKcunGvYDG5gRdBfLZtFlhvTou4JvDoU6d6pgnb8EauEvGLI3y f9RnhvQGkX/8nlG1NBV8C654ytRbHYPhXdkMxDQs9VMn49QNCqEGq2r3r45HgC5EsuId hq/6Q259Ar04/Zp4ly5m8XmOVMLfiaTQcfh34nHQjs+Wf72teqjLNj72SdTMhEWPZy7o uaOlHCUyspt4/XgmboOqe8t4RaWH2kcUV3AGCnytL41s2mJn42iUan5Ksk3Fey5OYbVM hRmQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532fapqg92WBt/yU7oVHdFi/+uIDarQuvHS4Di1F3ZNlAoBzf2a9 sdlzBd1hm0XobDN0c7D2iuxNRX6TnvGgNHkj2t2RDRN/ X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyqH8gQGITLfkuE1xO9cAupoO1UgLCTbA0UKI3vVL4aEdjt7BVAg3qECEe+3pxiU2Nz1rf02SsuFzYgrfP7S5E= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:410c:: with SMTP id j12mr3760499ejk.284.1593713608162; Thu, 02 Jul 2020 11:13:28 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Pavel Timofeev Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2020 21:13:03 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: set_rcvar() function use? To: ports-list freebsd X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49yR6f0f1nz48bn X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=b7ER3sU5; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of timp87@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4864:20::629 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=timp87@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.38 / 15.00]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.89)[-0.887]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.95)[-0.948]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2a00:1450:4864:20::629:from]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.55)[-0.550]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a00:1450:4000::/36]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2a00:1450::/32, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com:dkim] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.33 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2020 18:13:30 -0000 Hello, dear community. I'm confused, please, help me. There is a rc.subr function which was buried[1] and resurrected[2] after a couple of years in almost the same form. I don't know what happened behind the scenes, but I have a question. Is it a preferable way to define a rc.conf variable these days in rc scripts (again/over and over)? If it is then I'd like to propose changes to FreeBSD porters handbook page where basic rc script is described[3] Also rc.subr(8) man page is missing set_rcvar() function description. BTW it's missing a lot more functions description from rc.subr (are missing functions for internal use only?) If it's not then tell me please what it was resurrected for. Just curious and for the record. I maintain several ports and want to know what is considered the right/preferable way to write rc scripts. [1] https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2012-January/031246.html https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=230099 https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=230103 https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=230105 [2] https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=272393 [3] https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/rc-scripts.html From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Jul 2 18:54:21 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C013235D967 for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2020 18:54:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hrs@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::24b:4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49yS1n4fZVz4BqG; Thu, 2 Jul 2020 18:54:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hrs@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2400:4051:a743:3c00:16:ceff:fe34:2700]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: hrs) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D857C19B89; Thu, 2 Jul 2020 18:54:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hrs@FreeBSD.org) Date: Fri, 03 Jul 2020 03:54:03 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20200703.035403.856368268140192104.hrs@FreeBSD.org> To: timp87@gmail.com Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: set_rcvar() function use? From: Hiroki Sato In-Reply-To: References: X-Old-PGPkey-fingerprint: BDB3 443F A5DD B3D0 A530 FFD7 4F2C D3D8 2793 CF2D X-PGPkey-fingerprint: 6C0D 2353 27CF 80C7 901E FDD2 DBB0 7DC6 6F1F 737F X-Mailer: Mew version 6.8 on Emacs 26.3 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Multipart/Signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512; boundary="--Security_Multipart(Fri_Jul__3_03_54_03_2020_015)--" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2020 18:54:21 -0000 ----Security_Multipart(Fri_Jul__3_03_54_03_2020_015)-- Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Pavel Timofeev wrote in : ti> Hello, dear community. I'm confused, please, help me. ti> ti> There is a rc.subr function which was buried[1] and resurrected[2] after a ti> couple of years in almost the same form. ti> ti> I don't know what happened behind the scenes, but I have a question. ti> Is it a preferable way to define a rc.conf variable these days in rc ti> scripts (again/over and over)? I resurrected it because I wanted to change the standard style to use set_rcvar() to declare the user-configurable variables, their default values, and descriptions without losing backward compatibility. There is no clear consensus on this migration, however. The primary motivation was to add multi-instance support in rc scrupts[1]. To support this, the set_rcvar() style was required. [1] https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2014-October/052706.html Another issue I am aware of is that rc scripts installed by ports/pkg that they cannot have related entries in /etc/defaults/rc.conf for the default values. So a lot of ports tend to end up with assignments in the rc scripts like this: : ${foo_enable=YES} This introduces inconsistency and it is difficult to find documentation about which knobs are available. The set_rcvar() style should mitigate this and also implements a support to obsolete a variable when needed. set_rcvar_obsolete() will convert the old value to the new variable automatically or emit an error if there is no compatibility between the old and the new. I committed set_rcvar() part only in [1], not whole of the multi-instance support. This is because it was quite difficult to control which version of rc.subr is installed. If rc scipts in ports use set_rcvar() on older versions of FreeBSD which do not support it, the port breaks. At this moment all of the supported FreeBSD versions have the resurrected set_rcvar(), so I think it is now safe to use it globally. Probably we might want to add a version number or feature flags in rc.subr to prevent this kind of situation. I am planning to revisit the multi-instance support shortly because I am using it for a long time and I think it is useful. While I did not receive a strong objection to it so far, it is also true that adopting the set_rcvar() style was not discussed properly. I would like more feedback before moving forward. -- Hiroki ----Security_Multipart(Fri_Jul__3_03_54_03_2020_015)-- Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iMoEABMKAC4WIQRsDSNTJ8+Ax5Ae/dLbsH3Gbx9zfwUCXv4tSxAcaHJzQGZyZWVi c2Qub3JnAAoJENuwfcZvH3N/TPACCQG57IywI2O3e1OCbZzkgMEkjJvXrwgBWB74 1xn0wRoZcET9ENt3A7PIyaSAwH+DsqizwSiQh77i5+jdkY9JWZTa0QIJAVowj7KS f0/cq7kVxTUa4cRQY98ff6foeDp0BTboqbc5prUzrnSvJJ5SAyVi2nVMi/z9Xj+Z R5OE8SN1ZzMvvp6M =yATc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ----Security_Multipart(Fri_Jul__3_03_54_03_2020_015)---- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Jul 2 23:28:36 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26227362943 for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2020 23:28:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daniel.engberg.lists@pyret.net) Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net (relay3-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.183.195]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49yZ6B5nKBz4QBY for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2020 23:28:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daniel.engberg.lists@pyret.net) Received: from webmail.gandi.net (webmail23.sd4.0x35.net [10.200.201.23]) (Authenticated sender: daniel.engberg@pyret.net) by relay3-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id BE94B60002; Thu, 2 Jul 2020 23:28:28 +0000 (UTC) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Fri, 03 Jul 2020 01:28:28 +0200 From: Daniel Engberg To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Cc: naddy@mips.inka.de, kremels@kreme.com Subject: Re: Reminder: freedb.org (CDDB) has shut down Message-ID: X-Sender: daniel.engberg.lists@pyret.net User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.3.13 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49yZ6B5nKBz4QBY X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of daniel.engberg.lists@pyret.net designates 217.70.183.195 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=daniel.engberg.lists@pyret.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.40 / 15.00]; FAKE_REPLY(1.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_GOOD(0.00)[217.70.183.195:from]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:217.70.183.192/28]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[pyret.net]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.99)[-0.988]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.03)[-0.031]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.98)[-0.984]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:29169, ipnet:217.70.176.0/20, country:FR]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[217.70.183.195:from] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2020 23:28:36 -0000 Hi, I think it might be worth considering using freedb.dbpoweramp.com which common software such as dbpoweramp and foobar200 uses and/or recommends. It's also recommended on Hydrogenaudio forums: https://hydrogenaud.io/index.php?topic=119006.msg981467#msg981467 In general one might want look into something that uses Musicbrainz as it's considered to be better overall as far as I can tell. Without any intention of hijacking the thread, has anyone looked at porting Whipper to *BSD? https://github.com/whipper-team/whipper Best regards, Daniel From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Jul 3 07:44:25 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9219A36D78D for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2020 07:44:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49yn6K3Q3Gz3f1r for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2020 07:44:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 7516136D78C; Fri, 3 Jul 2020 07:44:25 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74D3D36D447 for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2020 07:44:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49yn6K2Zc5z3fHS for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2020 07:44:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (portscout.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3CA94862F for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2020 07:44:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.nyi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.10]) by portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 0637iPbS071713 for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2020 07:44:25 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 0637iPY6071712; Fri, 3 Jul 2020 07:44:25 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <202007030744.0637iPY6071712@portscout.nyi.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.nyi.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2020 07:44:25 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jul 2020 07:44:25 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ lang/snobol4 | 2.0 | 2.1.5 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Reported by: portscout! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Jul 3 07:53:18 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1CFE36DAAD for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2020 07:53:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mpp302@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ej1-f66.google.com (mail-ej1-f66.google.com [209.85.218.66]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49ynJZ1cMyz3fq5; Fri, 3 Jul 2020 07:53:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mpp302@gmail.com) Received: by mail-ej1-f66.google.com with SMTP id w16so33223084ejj.5; Fri, 03 Jul 2020 00:53:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=GQ8895v8MDZ8VMKOpmjCsL5kC8nngprlxj5L+vyOvPE=; b=DxKQBWvxVltrp/0BhB9cxbaKOCHU3/VTj+X8ZUok6esYvhUekohyrwpqZ6VKfttX0B N2MY0F9X1noGH0zmYWRBp3eMvasOSxsy8XXLehgwas9D/aQ7C+LqQXJ9veIty6XkOSxS zFAO0ku695+uWEpVXDpevuBsHSuNWvOtUBMVtjFTznN2aCQjbt5wGntrWZz2NFEw1+B5 hWE3BUmyICJr9oDgjmz7AF+SiLU6nC9erMGiJdryb7cuEzVJ3U3vkPZUoo0Ndq8RHgt3 XJb6lWr0yjkYE6ICWTDnJTgTsmt9HW6qI9jH/q7rYwjo0zePs61PpR5ADLJoX+y82UIn tQCQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5312yoR4MgddZF8hjImki6jFe4LC6meDk3JDCYtffELN5gRhIM+M On5yq4uhe+/yiEJ3XA72Umfbgw2MX10= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyliCdZftgw7+lP+iJqqyE71DJjip2HL/BNwJxXuA/2vj7nczQeoJCBK+RhTyRGHDb4x0MyoA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:4acc:: with SMTP id u12mr7458520ejt.358.1593762796278; Fri, 03 Jul 2020 00:53:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2a02:8109:98c0:1bc0:5e5f:67ff:fef4:ffd8? ([2a02:8109:98c0:1bc0:5e5f:67ff:fef4:ffd8]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g6sm8813281ejz.19.2020.07.03.00.53.15 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 03 Jul 2020 00:53:15 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: set_rcvar() function use? To: Hiroki Sato , timp87@gmail.com Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, manu@FreeBSD.org References: <20200703.035403.856368268140192104.hrs@FreeBSD.org> From: Mateusz Piotrowski <0mp@FreeBSD.org> Message-ID: <34921b6e-ce3a-13e4-0cc1-3ca47b5a9cef@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2020 09:53:13 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200703.035403.856368268140192104.hrs@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49ynJZ1cMyz3fq5 X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of mpp302@gmail.com designates 209.85.218.66 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=mpp302@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.17 / 15.00]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:209.85.128.0/17]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_GOOD(0.00)[209.85.218.66:from]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[FreeBSD.org]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.85)[-0.848]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.32)[-0.319]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[209.85.218.66:from]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.01)[-1.005]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[FreeBSD.org,gmail.com]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[0mp@FreeBSD.org,mpp302@gmail.com]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:209.85.128.0/17, country:US]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[0mp@FreeBSD.org,mpp302@gmail.com]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jul 2020 07:53:19 -0000 Hi, On 7/2/20 8:54 PM, Hiroki Sato wrote: > Pavel Timofeev wrote > in : > > ti> Hello, dear community. I'm confused, please, help me. > ti> > ti> There is a rc.subr function which was buried[1] and resurrected[2] after a > ti> couple of years in almost the same form. > ti> > ti> I don't know what happened behind the scenes, but I have a question. > ti> Is it a preferable way to define a rc.conf variable these days in rc > ti> scripts (again/over and over)? > > I resurrected it because I wanted to change the standard style to use > set_rcvar() to declare the user-configurable variables, their default > values, and descriptions without losing backward compatibility. > There is no clear consensus on this migration, however. > > The primary motivation was to add multi-instance support in rc > scrupts[1]. To support this, the set_rcvar() style was required. > > [1] https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2014-October/052706.html > > Another issue I am aware of is that rc scripts installed by ports/pkg > that they cannot have related entries in /etc/defaults/rc.conf for > the default values. So a lot of ports tend to end up with > assignments in the rc scripts like this: > > : ${foo_enable=YES} > > This introduces inconsistency and it is difficult to find > documentation about which knobs are available. The set_rcvar() style > should mitigate this and also implements a support to obsolete a > variable when needed. set_rcvar_obsolete() will convert the old > value to the new variable automatically or emit an error if there is > no compatibility between the old and the new. > > I committed set_rcvar() part only in [1], not whole of the > multi-instance support. This is because it was quite difficult to > control which version of rc.subr is installed. If rc scipts in ports > use set_rcvar() on older versions of FreeBSD which do not support it, > the port breaks. At this moment all of the supported FreeBSD > versions have the resurrected set_rcvar(), so I think it is now safe > to use it globally. Probably we might want to add a version number > or feature flags in rc.subr to prevent this kind of situation. > > I am planning to revisit the multi-instance support shortly because I > am using it for a long time and I think it is useful. While I did > not receive a strong objection to it so far, it is also true that > adopting the set_rcvar() style was not discussed properly. I would > like more feedback before moving forward. AFAIR, manu@ was concerned at some point that using set_rcvar() extensively might result in slowdowns on embedded systems. Regards, Mateusz From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Jul 3 08:28:49 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CE3936EA2B for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2020 08:28:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adridg@freebsd.org) Received: from lb2-smtp-cloud7.xs4all.net (lb2-smtp-cloud7.xs4all.net [194.109.24.28]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.xs4all.net", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49yp5Y1drXz3ygg for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2020 08:28:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adridg@freebsd.org) Received: from cust-d4a83f22 ([IPv6:fc0c:c11d:cecc:f58a:eaa1:c0:9d8f:c143]) by smtp-cloud7.xs4all.net with ESMTPA id rH3sjkXd7BncFrH3tjl9Qo; Fri, 03 Jul 2020 10:28:47 +0200 From: Adriaan de Groot To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, andyf@andyit.com.au Subject: Re: audoi/openal-soft fails (Andy Farkas) Date: Fri, 03 Jul 2020 10:28:44 +0200 Message-ID: <3224572.gzUHUCRiql@beastie.bionicmutton.org> Organization: FreeBSD In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2029419.uJW0cDvVUg"; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfGjz3rJP5jf5x8IjRrBRctCJoO2+zME/+wNhOJNapZyn+NKEmE/N6QT07/son6dctThS3BogmZicCOt1+AObvVPsWONgUhsK1J6ZsjbrNdqaoyQM98D5 blJ/6iEbObTcuTRBzV/fhBZC42VxhIRp1INJWMYp+jL3ig7WXm9d3IUkZuEWjpAsOGNO9jQVSL3RFWF5H78UvZLX0yjujEAcgPwLkua+lZG/mSf7g9CuCW7I X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49yp5Y1drXz3ygg X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:3265, ipnet:194.109.0.0/16, country:NL] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jul 2020 08:28:49 -0000 --nextPart2029419.uJW0cDvVUg Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" On Thursday, 2 July 2020 14:00:01 CEST freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org wrote: > 1. audoi/openal-soft fails (Andy Farkas) > > > # portmaster audio/openal-soft > What you're showing here are a couple of *warnings* from CMake (known issues, not harmful: recent CMake is more picky about naming conventions, in an effort to make things more predictable to consumers of find-modules). > ? The package name passed to `find_package_handle_standard_args` (OPENSL) > ? does not match the name of the calling package (OpenSL).? This can > lead to > ? The package name passed to `find_package_handle_standard_args` (MYSOFA) > ? does not match the name of the calling package (MySOFA).? This can > lead to ^^ These are just warnings due to variations in capitalization. They are not the problem. > -- Configuring incomplete, errors occurred! > See also > "/usr/ports/audio/openal-soft/work/.build/CMakeFiles/CMakeOutput.log". > See also > "/usr/ports/audio/openal-soft/work/.build/CMakeFiles/CMakeError.log". > *** Error code 1 The actual error is elsewhere. Remember that CMake, like C or C++ compilers, can carry on and on and on after an actual error, spitting out warnings and stuff-that-sort-of-makes-sense. You'll need to go back in the logs. FWIW, in poudriere and with default options, this builds ok. [ade] --nextPart2029419.uJW0cDvVUg Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQGzBAABCAAdFiEEV+FL0c1sGYvBG/GNYafSYnfk0NsFAl7+7DwACgkQYafSYnfk 0NvdXwv7BmbOh0frd864JK9Ocb70QuG/FdB9f+prqVbrvXWncaZPSqeXwEs8MBCC 3er6Jv7NIFS1PhAD70UGKyaff36ftZJjUfaY0+psTtxvAw8ByOGB4Gvkt10Gv48r nxw23lkTbOw4GTcNfzjTIwgGHDMFOx5CFAfIsHd0fB7FYfT1Z5xYCPVEWafOCr+p K06bh2o38Tr2R3+RlVPHLLv/RF3+OQz2kL3HCdjXd3rR2FOAi6r9GESJ41fDR+3a L7cyBXWSNDQgmYsaDg9iHLYErwEdpsBpJVQbQYt5HyZabc/HP3yuq/gIiDQa5UEF 6R7n5SrvhWGrhIXHWSY0L1xNjG0MW5ClG1EWybHIk8lORSm2JSFELO6JDPfqDVR7 XXc5A98sUbukbP05iZDsdzywF5YUWtUwxYOWicKQYh0MKl7WLC16ncxWrtol9bPA TBBly4oGay3T85ySrT5QeiI52637VhKmuuyhLm3YHtqD0NUvKRh44nsabshe2KlJ XTXWaShm =EhH6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2029419.uJW0cDvVUg-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Jul 3 09:44:05 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E29534875C for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2020 09:44:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andyf@andyit.com.au) Received: from alpine.spintel.net.au (alpine.spintel.net.au [IPv6:2407:e400:1::b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49yqmN3v5yz44K0; Fri, 3 Jul 2020 09:44:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andyf@andyit.com.au) Received: from drunkfish.andyit.com.au (210-1-210-40-cpe.spintel.net.au [210.1.210.40]) by alpine.spintel.net.au (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 877004C12AF; Fri, 3 Jul 2020 19:43:48 +1000 (AEST) Received: from [172.22.2.15] (tosh2.andyit.com.au [172.22.2.15]) by drunkfish.andyit.com.au (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 0639hjQ7041811 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 3 Jul 2020 19:43:47 +1000 (AEST) (envelope-from andyf@andyit.com.au) Subject: Re: audoi/openal-soft fails (Andy Farkas) To: Adriaan de Groot , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <3224572.gzUHUCRiql@beastie.bionicmutton.org> From: Andy Farkas Message-ID: <3957c8c4-6833-d528-8ffa-fbe95c07bb7c@andyit.com.au> Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2020 19:43:41 +1000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <3224572.gzUHUCRiql@beastie.bionicmutton.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49yqmN3v5yz44K0 X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; ASN(0.00)[asn:18390, ipnet:2407:e400::/32, country:AU]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jul 2020 09:44:05 -0000 On 3/07/2020 6:28 pm, Adriaan de Groot wrote: > FWIW, in poudriere and with default options, this builds ok. Option "[x] CONFIG   Install configuration utility (needs Qt 5)" triggers the failure. -andyf From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Jul 3 09:48:22 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7CED348C45 for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2020 09:48:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ed.arrakis@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ed1-x536.google.com (mail-ed1-x536.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::536]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49yqsK2ytvz44L3 for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2020 09:48:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ed.arrakis@gmail.com) Received: by mail-ed1-x536.google.com with SMTP id dm19so20889682edb.13 for ; Fri, 03 Jul 2020 02:48:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=Wosbd46eTrJbceUjZgLhlOzminu8vRsL49hgGcu7njI=; b=nh88sDiCKD74ERFqR8tyYIP7qtRYuaUdkrPUHmEPgIITALPVs+9uFa1D7syxZkNTw0 lra4rp2lNujeaJJ2IZ9Du6MYTOmUcUHhgRNvMOIsj0St3Rs3MDbIibzWIB5PqQdw8H4z isbLZIRu6149y5QCLPJ9XTTvHmv5yf73kcJezbc0dBvixabTUD04DghgwWM3bEadOM1Y LIUcmEJUu0z6akxEab8Y66xPXtChSE9qD/aIVUv7TEQuZMOPoir5dgWd376L+QzpxCsP Ecwk4wuiI+/yzxkqbaoJiN3JOy+MmOzZvepETE5DBuTfZd5UbVE/IVCWE6JNW+Sj5ou7 ONaA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=Wosbd46eTrJbceUjZgLhlOzminu8vRsL49hgGcu7njI=; b=MFg0zYdphzJ5W3lR35nV0zH5smxELiEcQhDmzCpP9iEq85WiDCcS/BEoroKbA76oV9 qUH+3d8lgTszQ4Hh9iBUzd3tkydQH06akZe/WhqhXEyuNYfHXD2b/7F/NvaW2wM26oMM +GLIsquWCoLbu/evt78ef1Qpkb0ZXcGAib3QRmolJXID1u4mk6SS7dZP0xobW4FMyMmE tVnzopari3jQPzzkxSGIOjFZr0L1o402cQBZDu3pPqCX5lGTIlD6I1lPZqN9JQSepJaI N2/qg6c7YXUvuVdtrhjfeJeoSUmt8fmmk9o7LkVbBkxp264uAN0WPCeAuyaj5l8/51VE FhBg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530jEz05UYTNGdTixUVD//hbDP9HdF0ZZffA7q7gfKP68voL8lj0 qYFTb3gVtTCTKRPxyKITNaXTUCEpmlIghi9a9ecsCPPgzOw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwDJnGAVZD5YeiZWozqzf/6wUeXe72mCKrSURcJDjFmF2IzAltFQsj6jLt0B0Fbh2vGdbdr6ST0Ett0na3UxCc= X-Received: by 2002:a50:8467:: with SMTP id 94mr38872284edp.249.1593769699461; Fri, 03 Jul 2020 02:48:19 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Nuno Teixeira Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2020 10:48:04 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Need a comitter at PR 247496 (security/doas) To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49yqsK2ytvz44L3 X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=nh88sDiC; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of edarrakis@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4864:20::536 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=edarrakis@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.16 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.92)[-0.921]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com:dkim]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a00:1450:4000::/36:c]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2a00:1450:4864:20::536:from]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.24)[-0.241]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2a00:1450::/32, country:US]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.33 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jul 2020 09:48:23 -0000 Hello, Could a comitter take a look at PR 247496 please. Thanks, Nuno Teixeira From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Jul 3 10:35:37 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FC10349C75 for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2020 10:35:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jbeich@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [96.47.72.132]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49yrvs3j98z46t7; Fri, 3 Jul 2020 10:35:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jbeich@freebsd.org) Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1354) id 7847C14BF4; Fri, 3 Jul 2020 10:35:37 +0000 (UTC) From: Jan Beich To: Andy Farkas Cc: Adriaan de Groot , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: audoi/openal-soft fails (Andy Farkas) References: <3224572.gzUHUCRiql@beastie.bionicmutton.org> <3957c8c4-6833-d528-8ffa-fbe95c07bb7c@andyit.com.au> Date: Fri, 03 Jul 2020 12:35:33 +0200 In-Reply-To: <3957c8c4-6833-d528-8ffa-fbe95c07bb7c@andyit.com.au> (Andy Farkas's message of "Fri, 3 Jul 2020 19:43:41 +1000") Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jul 2020 10:35:37 -0000 Andy Farkas writes: > On 3/07/2020 6:28 pm, Adriaan de Groot wrote: > >> FWIW, in poudriere and with default options, this builds ok. > > Option "[x] CONFIG Install configuration utility (needs Qt 5)" > > triggers the failure. Builds fine here, see https://reviews.freebsd.org/P405 From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Jul 3 12:43:08 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9AF134DA9A for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2020 12:43:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49yvl01wGCz4F5L for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2020 12:43:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 3FF3934D8AA; Fri, 3 Jul 2020 12:43:08 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EA8234DC47 for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2020 12:43:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from slim.berklix.org (slim.berklix.org [94.185.90.68]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "slim.berklix.org", Issuer "slim.berklix.org" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49yvkz0nRgz4Dmd for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2020 12:43:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from mart.js.berklix.net (p5ddb7f59.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [93.219.127.89]) (authenticated bits=128) by slim.berklix.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id 063Cgul6050247 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 3 Jul 2020 14:43:04 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (fire.js.berklix.net [192.168.91.41]) by mart.js.berklix.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id 063Cgt1C024043; Fri, 3 Jul 2020 14:42:55 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fire.js.berklix.net (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 063CgeDY095643; Fri, 3 Jul 2020 14:42:55 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Message-Id: <202007031242.063CgeDY095643@fire.js.berklix.net> to: ports@freebsd.org cc: Ramya Yella Subject: Re: [FreeBSD-Ports-Announce] Request for net-snmp 5.8 on freeBSD From: "Julian H. Stacey" Organization: http://berklix.com/jhs http://stolenvotes.uk User-agent: EXMH on FreeBSD http://berklix.com/free/ X-From: http://www.berklix.org/~jhs/ In-reply-to: Your message "Thu, 02 Jul 2020 15:46:19 +0530." Date: Fri, 03 Jul 2020 14:42:40 +0200 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49yvkz0nRgz4Dmd X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of jhs@berklix.com has no SPF policy when checking 94.185.90.68) smtp.mailfrom=jhs@berklix.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.53 / 15.00]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.19)[-0.186]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[berklix.com]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; HAS_ORG_HEADER(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.46)[-0.460]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[94.185.90.68:from]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.27)[0.274]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:33824, ipnet:94.185.88.0/22, country:DE]; FREEMAIL_CC(0.00)[gmail.com]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[93.219.127.89:received] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jul 2020 12:43:08 -0000 Hi, Reference: > From: Ramya Yella > Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2020 15:46:19 +0530 > To: freebsd-ports-announce@freebsd.org Ramya Yella wrote: > Hi All, > > I would like to know when FreeBSD will start supporting the net-snmp > 5.8 version. Any tentative release date? Strange. I assumed ports-announce@freebsd.org was a moderated list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo lists reebsd-ports-announce Important news and instructions about the FreeBSD "ports collection" [moderated] Yet https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-announce just has This is a low-volume mailing list, intended for announcements. Ramya Yella's enquiry now on ports@ list moderators@ bcc'd as nudge so check ports-announce@ config Cheers -- Julian Stacey, Consultant Sys. Eng., BSD Linux http://berklix.com/jhs/ Crash Brexit Dec. 2020, aids speculators & Russia. http://berklix.uk/brexit/ https://www.democracyunleashed.org.uk/advisers-petition From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Jul 3 13:13:03 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAF0934E2A5 for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2020 13:13:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49ywPW52vyz4GKt for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2020 13:13:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id AB62F34E2A4; Fri, 3 Jul 2020 13:13:03 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB29534E488 for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2020 13:13:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@freebsd.org) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49ywPW2hKrz4GWP for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2020 13:13:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@freebsd.org) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.92.3 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1jrLUq-000Agh-2c; Fri, 03 Jul 2020 15:12:52 +0200 Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2020 15:12:52 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger To: "Julian H. Stacey" Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Ramya Yella Subject: Re: [FreeBSD-Ports-Announce] Request for net-snmp 5.8 on freeBSD Message-ID: <20200703131252.GB39563@home.opsec.eu> References: <202007031242.063CgeDY095643@fire.js.berklix.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <202007031242.063CgeDY095643@fire.js.berklix.net> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49ywPW2hKrz4GWP X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.00 / 15.00]; local_wl_from(0.00)[freebsd.org]; ASN(0.00)[asn:12502, ipnet:2001:14f8::/32, country:DE] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jul 2020 13:13:03 -0000 Hi! > > I would like to know when FreeBSD will start supporting the net-snmp > > 5.8 version. Any tentative release date? > > Strange. I assumed ports-announce@freebsd.org was a moderated list It is. As postmaster@, I daily check the mod-queue for posts, using a script written bei dhw@, and approve those that fit the criteria. This post unfortunatly was fat-fingered by me to be approved. Which makes it even more embrassing, as I was the one who tried and failed to update net-snmp, see: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232025 Hope this makes this more transparent. -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 Now what ? From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Jul 4 05:11:28 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB022361D8F for ; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 05:11:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hrs@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::24b:4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49zKgN5LNbz4B0R; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 05:11:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hrs@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2400:4051:a743:3c00:16:ceff:fe34:2700]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: hrs) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A8E9528FE0; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 05:11:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hrs@FreeBSD.org) Date: Sat, 04 Jul 2020 14:09:46 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20200704.140946.1661194655626577558.hrs@FreeBSD.org> To: 0mp@FreeBSD.org Cc: timp87@gmail.com, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, manu@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: set_rcvar() function use? From: Hiroki Sato In-Reply-To: <34921b6e-ce3a-13e4-0cc1-3ca47b5a9cef@FreeBSD.org> References: <20200703.035403.856368268140192104.hrs@FreeBSD.org> <34921b6e-ce3a-13e4-0cc1-3ca47b5a9cef@FreeBSD.org> X-Old-PGPkey-fingerprint: BDB3 443F A5DD B3D0 A530 FFD7 4F2C D3D8 2793 CF2D X-PGPkey-fingerprint: 6C0D 2353 27CF 80C7 901E FDD2 DBB0 7DC6 6F1F 737F X-Mailer: Mew version 6.8 on Emacs 26.3 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Multipart/Signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512; boundary="--Security_Multipart(Sat_Jul__4_14_09_46_2020_621)--" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Jul 2020 05:11:29 -0000 ----Security_Multipart(Sat_Jul__4_14_09_46_2020_621)-- Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mateusz Piotrowski <0mp@FreeBSD.org> wrote in <34921b6e-ce3a-13e4-0cc1-3ca47b5a9cef@FreeBSD.org>: 0m> > I am planning to revisit the multi-instance support shortly because I 0m> > am using it for a long time and I think it is useful. While I did 0m> > not receive a strong objection to it so far, it is also true that 0m> > adopting the set_rcvar() style was not discussed properly. I would 0m> > like more feedback before moving forward. 0m> 0m> AFAIR, manu@ was concerned at some point that using set_rcvar() extensively 0m> might result in slowdowns on embedded systems. A discussion in the past about the performance was an additional fork(2) when using set_rcvar() for rc_var=`set_rcvar`. The use case of the resurrected one is "set_rcvar A B" as a replacement of "A=B", and it does not involve a subshell. I agree that the performance perspective should also be discussed, though. The current rc.subr and network.subr already have more expensive operations, so we might want to gather profiling information. -- Hiroki ----Security_Multipart(Sat_Jul__4_14_09_46_2020_621)-- Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iMoEABMKAC4WIQRsDSNTJ8+Ax5Ae/dLbsH3Gbx9zfwUCXwAPGhAcaHJzQGZyZWVi c2Qub3JnAAoJENuwfcZvH3N/zxkCCQH66bdWDZ2aLTx4xHzTtw7T6wWNMtatuVoH qAngO26Vgpa+ZScyAmdcsSqEKVmXPhdd1B0VHL7yUJvj+oSY1vCMRgIJAX/LMSyn +7GFU9DayqcQ5O5M36pUnDTuEexePTrhJaozq0Pe82M2U7eY7CvGcuS5YTwEzDBF nTbxXHWh764R2+jO =e0Wo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ----Security_Multipart(Sat_Jul__4_14_09_46_2020_621)---- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Jul 4 07:38:38 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25B0E364324 for ; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 07:38:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49zNxB0DMyz4JhS for ; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 07:38:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 07A673640CA; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 07:38:38 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 065B33640C9 for ; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 07:38:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49zNx96VY8z4JR1 for ; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 07:38:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (portscout.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C27BA18A6E for ; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 07:38:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.nyi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.10]) by portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 0647cbgw020508 for ; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 07:38:37 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 0647cbk1020507; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 07:38:37 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <202007040738.0647cbk1020507@portscout.nyi.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.nyi.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2020 07:38:37 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Jul 2020 07:38:38 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ lang/opencoarrays | 2.7.1 | 2.9.0 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ textproc/libextractor | 1.9 | 1.10 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Reported by: portscout! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Jul 4 10:19:58 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 118633489AE; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 10:19:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rene@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:6074::16:84]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49zSWK4JTXz4T7T; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 10:19:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rene@freebsd.org) Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1185) id E4B20473C; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 10:19:56 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2020 10:19:56 +0000 From: Rene Ladan To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-ports-announce@freebsd.org Subject: New 2020Q3 branch Message-ID: <20200704101956.GA59396@freefall.freebsd.org> Reply-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Jul 2020 10:19:59 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Hi, The 2020Q3 branch has been created. It means that the next update on the quarterly packages will be on the 2020Q3 branch. A lot of things happened in the last three months: - - pkg 1.14.6 - - Default version of Lazarus switched to 2.0.8 - - New default version for Java: 8 - - Firefox 78.0.1 - - Firefox-esr 68.10.0 - - Chromium 83.0.4103.116 - - Ruby 2.5.8, 2.6.6, 2.7.1 - - Qt5 5.14.2 - - CHANGES entries 20200414, 20200514, 20200531 Next quarterly package builds will start on Saturday 2020-07-04 01:00 UTC and should be available on your closest mirrors few days later. For those stat nerds out there, here's what happened during the last 3 months on head: Number of commits: 10315 Number of committers: 178 Most active committers: 3557 sunpoet 757 yuri 448 jbeich 285 tcberner 224 tobik 197 dbaio 182 amdmi3 161 tagattie 157 pkubaj 154 fernape Diffstat: 21847 files changed, 532252 insertions(+), 311634 deletions(-) and on the 2020Q2 branch: Number of commits: 476 Number of committers: 65 Most active committers: 106 jbeich 40 linimon 28 rene 25 pkubaj 20 mandree 18 joneum 18 dbaio 11 tcberner 10 sunpoet 10 kai Diffstat: 1539 files changed, 45748 insertions(+), 14012 deletions(-) Regards, René -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQGyBAEBCgCcFiEE+zdFyG8V6O2sgTL82ClOw7vE19UFAl8AV0pfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldEZC Mzc0NUM4NkYxNUU4RURBQzgxMzJGQ0Q4Mjk0RUMzQkJDNEQ3RDUeHHBvcnRtZ3It c2VjcmV0YXJ5QGZyZWVic2Qub3JnAAoJENgpTsO7xNfVHvUH/jouOAb5MXu/5iW5 ws4e9n8QoEHvd4ux8RsjUi/ZsHk8NbIpAWAN7q8n+eLnQBD4VKXyhIDpjmsrVyc8 N+95gfHMsTCrdpVe8W+fx2pppgj9B8Cg9K8Li9JO6wqxd/8SMI9a+k5HiUTciwkR Nzu57XVU8U7JFI1AKWI5ZagFIJHz4BqAL6e2+VfyE9vqxhUAk9YRbkDPRUpf75MT 6iA2PAPcOjj41T8Hxd971RTMJ7AaguqJ6VtCk62Th41XkRlpB3aZkMTQQ7ntwxp5 kHHY+xgXX0ZIeFJ6nBj64/DihWF/ZXTGVzaHbg6DygoGOG/XOK9ZmWOwiNsiloOc WqVWTHU= =Rl39 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Jul 4 12:12:42 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9304F34BDBD for ; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 12:12:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@opsec.eu) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49zW1Q1z6Vz4b6J for ; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 12:12:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@opsec.eu) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 439EC34BA5E; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 12:12:42 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 436A134BBE0 for ; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 12:12:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@opsec.eu) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49zW1P4C2xz4bYb for ; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 12:12:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@opsec.eu) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.92.3 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1jrh26-000Dje-GS for ports@freebsd.org; Sat, 04 Jul 2020 14:12:38 +0200 Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2020 14:12:38 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: why does pkg try to install an older version of pkg ? Message-ID: <20200704121238.GC39563@home.opsec.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49zW1P4C2xz4bYb X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of pi@opsec.eu designates 2001:14f8:200::1 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=pi@opsec.eu X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.82 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.74)[-0.738]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx:c]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[opsec.eu]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.73)[-0.731]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.05)[-0.054]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:12502, ipnet:2001:14f8::/32, country:DE]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Jul 2020 12:12:42 -0000 Hi! Trying to upgrade on a machine recently upgraded from 11.1 to 11.3, this happens: pkg upgrade -f pkg Updating ... repository catalogue... ... repository is up to date. All repositories are up to date. The following 1 package(s) will be affected (of 0 checked): Installed packages to be DOWNGRADED: pkg: 1.14.6 -> 1.10.5_1 Why does pkg insist on downgrading pkg ? How can this be fixed ? -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 Now what ? From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Jul 4 12:30:32 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D6BD34C607 for ; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 12:30:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cmt@burggraben.net) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49zWQ00PzQz4cKm for ; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 12:30:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cmt@burggraben.net) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 0C3F434C606; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 12:30:32 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C03934C603 for ; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 12:30:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cmt@burggraben.net) Received: from smtp.burggraben.net (smtp.burggraben.net [IPv6:2a01:4f8:140:510a::3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.burggraben.net", Issuer "Christoph Moench-Tegeder" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49zWPy74M9z4cYD for ; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 12:30:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cmt@burggraben.net) Received: from elch.exwg.net (elch.exwg.net [IPv6:2001:470:7120:1:127b:44ff:fe4f:148d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "elch.exwg.net", Issuer "Christoph Moench-Tegeder" (not verified)) by smtp.burggraben.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0EF5FC00311; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 14:30:28 +0200 (CEST) Received: by elch.exwg.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B412D139857; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 14:30:27 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2020 14:30:27 +0200 From: Christoph Moench-Tegeder To: Kurt Jaeger Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: why does pkg try to install an older version of pkg ? Message-ID: <20200704123027.GB96403@elch.exwg.net> References: <20200704121238.GC39563@home.opsec.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200704121238.GC39563@home.opsec.eu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.14.5 (2020-06-23) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49zWPy74M9z4cYD X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of cmt@burggraben.net designates 2a01:4f8:140:510a::3 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=cmt@burggraben.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.01 / 15.00]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.99)[-0.986]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a01:4f8:140:510a::3]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.01)[-1.012]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[burggraben.net]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED(-0.20)[2a01:4f8:140:510a::3:from]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.51)[-0.508]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:2a01:4f8::/29, country:DE]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Jul 2020 12:30:32 -0000 ## Kurt Jaeger (pi@opsec.eu): > pkg upgrade -f pkg > Updating ... repository catalogue... > ... repository is up to date. > All repositories are up to date. So what repo is that and what does it offer? > Installed packages to be DOWNGRADED: > pkg: 1.14.6 -> 1.10.5_1 > > Why does pkg insist on downgrading pkg ? How can this be fixed ? You are forcing "reinstallation or upgrade" (pkg-upgrade(8)) and if you have a stale repo which only offers that old pkg (is that perchance a 11.1 repo?)... that's what you get. Regards, Christoph -- Spare Space From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Jul 4 12:30:38 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4468534C2F8 for ; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 12:30:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lwhsu.freebsd@gmail.com) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49zWQ572krz4cMy for ; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 12:30:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lwhsu.freebsd@gmail.com) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id F07D134C609; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 12:30:37 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE71E34C608 for ; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 12:30:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lwhsu.freebsd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yb1-f182.google.com (mail-yb1-f182.google.com [209.85.219.182]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49zWQ50g9dz4cW2 for ; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 12:30:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lwhsu.freebsd@gmail.com) Received: by mail-yb1-f182.google.com with SMTP id y17so14622707ybm.12 for ; Sat, 04 Jul 2020 05:30:36 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ZwxtJ/LT6nbXulL4bEfvtxWZ3aNjPeI25d+3Nce+ano=; b=RD5hXAWPs+BdzWlSkujehm6tYCrMjZPThwN36Xfw76GjZn+aj13peMYA+r+1D08+dX 1Oy3GuaPyHAzh1+uNLCtvUNQ15G7avJob9Z7bA/sYR8yk+YP4qMADRzFFYEHd1GARIeq +iNLz6UC6XFEzWl0iKUjHcub+CAonnqr0JWwO8IfnyFwgNnDnbnAlB9kGzUKvHBUYigU 9CQO/ZT/LGWAUNQwpZUK4hD7CaWTaPecs8AhyISxvCftkhxffRbkpxBWuXtikI3Tp/Fb w1z5qqs2XbgMJ/tkQEXS6VylHZr9/3rg8Uc5sGYpR0taFiA/LmF001Z0/O/31r4mQWuP dEIg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533OBLRGZXM8W8kR6JawsABgY9I/1T0atxEz3CFYy9JnZF9h6SF/ MlAtArcLIuTLR2YSw+v7EDxioWpEaH+KXF8pGhpZwA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy0M30z2SfZTU9P5DhXRdqZxtbvZjqvcyUcfbxrv35P6ZFP+ojF1gQUU+ZpytL0pk4icwXbzT3SFX9F5c7TM2c= X-Received: by 2002:a25:408e:: with SMTP id n136mr7713708yba.127.1593865835947; Sat, 04 Jul 2020 05:30:35 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200704121238.GC39563@home.opsec.eu> In-Reply-To: <20200704121238.GC39563@home.opsec.eu> From: Li-Wen Hsu Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2020 20:30:24 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: why does pkg try to install an older version of pkg ? To: Kurt Jaeger Cc: ports@freebsd.org X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49zWQ50g9dz4cW2 X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of lwhsufreebsd@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.182 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=lwhsufreebsd@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.26 / 15.00]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[lwhsu@freebsd.org,lwhsufreebsd@gmail.com]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:209.85.128.0/17]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[ports@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[freebsd.org]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.97)[-0.965]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.38)[-0.377]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[209.85.219.182:from]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.92)[-0.918]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[lwhsu@freebsd.org,lwhsufreebsd@gmail.com]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[209.85.219.182:from]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:209.85.128.0/17, country:US]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.33 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Jul 2020 12:30:38 -0000 On Sat, Jul 4, 2020 at 20:12 Kurt Jaeger wrote: > Hi! > > Trying to upgrade on a machine recently upgraded from 11.1 to 11.3, > this happens: > > pkg upgrade -f pkg > Updating ... repository catalogue... > ... repository is up to date. > All repositories are up to date. > The following 1 package(s) will be affected (of 0 checked): > > Installed packages to be DOWNGRADED: > pkg: 1.14.6 -> 1.10.5_1 > > Why does pkg insist on downgrading pkg ? How can this be fixed ? Is the pkg branch used changed from latest to quarterly? Li-Wen > From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Jul 4 12:36:57 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1523934CB45 for ; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 12:36:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@opsec.eu) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49zWYN6DmXz4d6h for ; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 12:36:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@opsec.eu) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id D432534CD23; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 12:36:56 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3FB134CB44 for ; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 12:36:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@opsec.eu) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49zWYN0TJBz4dHt for ; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 12:36:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@opsec.eu) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.92.3 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1jrhPY-000EFX-Lj; Sat, 04 Jul 2020 14:36:52 +0200 Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2020 14:36:52 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Christoph Moench-Tegeder Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: why does pkg try to install an older version of pkg ? Message-ID: <20200704123652.GD39563@home.opsec.eu> References: <20200704121238.GC39563@home.opsec.eu> <20200704123027.GB96403@elch.exwg.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200704123027.GB96403@elch.exwg.net> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49zWYN0TJBz4dHt X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of pi@opsec.eu designates 2001:14f8:200::1 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=pi@opsec.eu X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.80 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.97)[-0.971]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx:c]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.002]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[opsec.eu]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.53)[-0.531]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:12502, ipnet:2001:14f8::/32, country:DE]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Jul 2020 12:36:57 -0000 Hi! > > pkg upgrade -f pkg > > Updating ... repository catalogue... > > ... repository is up to date. > > All repositories are up to date. > > So what repo is that and what does it offer? That's repo.nepustil.net, which is mostly up2date. > > Installed packages to be DOWNGRADED: > > pkg: 1.14.6 -> 1.10.5_1 > > > > Why does pkg insist on downgrading pkg ? How can this be fixed ? > > You are forcing "reinstallation or upgrade" (pkg-upgrade(8)) and > if you have a stale repo which only offers that old pkg (is that > perchance a 11.1 repo?)... that's what you get. It's a 11.3 repo, that's why I'm wondering... -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 Now what ? From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Jul 4 12:41:01 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ED4534CE6C for ; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 12:41:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@opsec.eu) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49zWf50LSmz4dqG for ; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 12:41:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@opsec.eu) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 09BF534D018; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 12:41:01 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0986734CE6B for ; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 12:41:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@opsec.eu) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49zWf46WvWz4dc7; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 12:41:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@opsec.eu) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.92.3 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1jrhTW-000EL4-20; Sat, 04 Jul 2020 14:40:58 +0200 Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2020 14:40:58 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Li-Wen Hsu Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: why does pkg try to install an older version of pkg ? Message-ID: <20200704124058.GE39563@home.opsec.eu> References: <20200704121238.GC39563@home.opsec.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49zWf46WvWz4dc7 X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:12502, ipnet:2001:14f8::/32, country:DE] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Jul 2020 12:41:01 -0000 Hi! > > Trying to upgrade on a machine recently upgraded from 11.1 to 11.3, > > this happens: > > > > pkg upgrade -f pkg > > Updating ... repository catalogue... > > ... repository is up to date. > > All repositories are up to date. > > The following 1 package(s) will be affected (of 0 checked): > > > > Installed packages to be DOWNGRADED: > > pkg: 1.14.6 -> 1.10.5_1 > > Why does pkg insist on downgrading pkg ? How can this be fixed ? > Is the pkg branch used changed from latest to quarterly? It's our own repo, which regularly rebuilds all the ports we use... That's what is so surprising to me. The previous pkg version was indeed 1.10.5_1, but I do not understand why pkg insists to install this. I've already replaced it with a copy of pkg-1.14.6, via: pkg add -f pkg-1.14.6.txz but when I then try to upgrade the whole pkg-tree from the repo, it insists to go back to 1.10.5_1. -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 Now what ? From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Jul 4 12:51:09 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BE2434D390 for ; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 12:51:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cmt@burggraben.net) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49zWsn1p2Jz4fZk for ; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 12:51:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cmt@burggraben.net) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 3BA9734D38F; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 12:51:09 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B6A534D4A1 for ; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 12:51:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cmt@burggraben.net) Received: from smtp.burggraben.net (smtp.burggraben.net [IPv6:2a01:4f8:140:510a::3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.burggraben.net", Issuer "Christoph Moench-Tegeder" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49zWsm4Ytfz4fPd for ; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 12:51:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cmt@burggraben.net) Received: from elch.exwg.net (elch.exwg.net [IPv6:2001:470:7120:1:127b:44ff:fe4f:148d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "elch.exwg.net", Issuer "Christoph Moench-Tegeder" (not verified)) by smtp.burggraben.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 32333C0030C; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 14:51:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: by elch.exwg.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id DA864139857; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 14:51:06 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2020 14:51:06 +0200 From: Christoph Moench-Tegeder To: Kurt Jaeger Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: why does pkg try to install an older version of pkg ? Message-ID: <20200704125106.GC96403@elch.exwg.net> References: <20200704121238.GC39563@home.opsec.eu> <20200704123027.GB96403@elch.exwg.net> <20200704123652.GD39563@home.opsec.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200704123652.GD39563@home.opsec.eu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.14.5 (2020-06-23) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49zWsm4Ytfz4fPd X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of cmt@burggraben.net designates 2a01:4f8:140:510a::3 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=cmt@burggraben.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.27 / 15.00]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.99)[-0.986]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a01:4f8:140:510a::3]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.01)[-1.012]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[burggraben.net]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED(-0.20)[2a01:4f8:140:510a::3:from]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.77)[-0.770]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:2a01:4f8::/29, country:DE]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Jul 2020 12:51:09 -0000 ## Kurt Jaeger (pi@opsec.eu): > > So what repo is that and what does it offer? > > That's repo.nepustil.net, which is mostly up2date. Are you sure you got the right path there? Any leftovers in /etc/pkg/ or /usr/local/etc/pkg/ ? You could grab packagesite.txz from your repo, untar that and then grep '"name":"pkg"' packagesite.yaml Any brokenness in /var/db/pkg/ ? There's a per-repo sqlite3 database which you could query like this: select name, origin, version from packages where name = 'pkg'; Regards, Christoph -- Spare Space From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Jul 4 13:28:45 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5E2034E378 for ; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 13:28:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@opsec.eu) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49zXj940jFz3SYS for ; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 13:28:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@opsec.eu) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 8784D34E377; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 13:28:45 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 874C534E3CC for ; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 13:28:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@opsec.eu) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49zXj90Tndz3SYR for ; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 13:28:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@opsec.eu) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.92.3 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1jriDh-000FPb-IQ; Sat, 04 Jul 2020 15:28:41 +0200 Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2020 15:28:41 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Christoph Moench-Tegeder Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: why does pkg try to install an older version of pkg ? Message-ID: <20200704132841.GG39563@home.opsec.eu> References: <20200704121238.GC39563@home.opsec.eu> <20200704123027.GB96403@elch.exwg.net> <20200704123652.GD39563@home.opsec.eu> <20200704125106.GC96403@elch.exwg.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200704125106.GC96403@elch.exwg.net> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49zXj90Tndz3SYR X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of pi@opsec.eu designates 2001:14f8:200::1 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=pi@opsec.eu X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.16 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.97)[-0.971]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx:c]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-0.996]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[opsec.eu]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.90)[-0.896]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:12502, ipnet:2001:14f8::/32, country:DE]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Jul 2020 13:28:45 -0000 Hi! > > > So what repo is that and what does it offer? > > That's repo.nepustil.net, which is mostly up2date. > Are you sure you got the right path there? Yes. > Any leftovers in /etc/pkg/ or /usr/local/etc/pkg/ ? None that I'm aware of. > You could grab packagesite.txz from your repo, untar that and then > grep '"name":"pkg"' packagesite.yaml > Any brokenness in /var/db/pkg/ ? How would I recognize brokenness ? The files that should be there are there. > There's a per-repo sqlite3 database which you could query like this: > select name, origin, version from packages where name = 'pkg'; I've tried, and it showed pkg-1.14.6 as it should be. Status-update: Our package builder (repo.nepustil.net) finished build for a new pkg-repo, and now the upgrade went through without regression to pkg-1.10.5_1 8-} -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 Now what ? From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Jul 4 14:00:37 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D06C34F1B0 for ; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 14:00:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carmel_ny@outlook.com) Received: from NAM11-CO1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-co1nam11olkn2072.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.92.18.72]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.protection.outlook.com", Issuer "GlobalSign Organization Validation CA - SHA256 - G3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49zYPv4lKvz3TvD for ; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 14:00:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carmel_ny@outlook.com) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=L9q+MQg75gAwJvgSu4IiAmRE7GHba5VZa5PzU8JnvQDQ1I4mljedP5OdE3YwvlM1kkyqLwVgm3eDWuqhdUYQa7H1gbul3j3K7ck2ByRuZU1aTlKRxP3rzEx6fKz0VUCBMY8CNbWyoJ7GZun02jKXaHZqnjZrtjCokGLSQxhrgBD+m6FYyNi6gbbRZEY72EvIPySKaQGBcBLnay/OVwBxgBjvfGyWa0qSljfMzyT6BjS/Q1nI7/LsHvIj3uiANzlTj9Hl+q3DuqHyf5+R8nzJK8tH4y7ICHnZlZY5iCCz3W008kmM2O/Kkor994N1CjJ1ifpkpoYAV4o4IY+jvwhPkA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=Tt6BatTHYOuwiNQ1yBYS2dfcouFKU+VGPsFprq/EX+U=; b=IY2axhkN5JSAHyY0e8RWtET2jKGtBaYk31n+txfPwV12oB70qL+ppxxTxzD1PTPsGRV58l+MdBbrx2ZgviCj7scmDbpk0tTfuCOlHkU5yBLCeTsiZFShlcKQg0c+EzuLeZJFHdwdE0YgDokbIbGzx+cQRhim4PR/9EYbduKSwW4JOiRHAtrHUTJKQ0Knm75fq+Wfjzae0ynAahCLFWGOfPAUDPEBzOO7C0XuHaA3qnlwWiXUgU6pAObn5Btpao4JRI3yRNPRFJWvih+HFhPvMKQmoGM66lMtqHIVTp3oLP/wFtseN1/NkuTPrNMhZnTrrhF53zhBRdS+RlHHEIvFaQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=none; dmarc=none; dkim=none; arc=none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=outlook.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=Tt6BatTHYOuwiNQ1yBYS2dfcouFKU+VGPsFprq/EX+U=; b=J5MohWUS6RKX0bA2taofKmM4qqF2GzPBL4eiDF/3HMrCMe2MPZ8MvubMcaav73OYwyA/gVVpl2ZmHv3CuqYMKRyYh82HvUM9zyj41a78afERPWYT/wGsxkKvX2hbNy8DdZZxX1zyYxyBcq0u8UhTXf7e1cluT7Z5hdP1zUPtgty1KN8oPBmBYnNYOIvL7yfMMdb6gljOO3dZW1icR4KHI9OHRa58clQEl+74yj2QA4jyNAHDK5Uq9/M7eYO5m8amzL5pAm92aBnvv1KTX4XRvWR9wts796UJjzJqsjSISAOx9Tvlh/xhZAGWQ4BURPlBi+C++hC6sub5zqo2x1YvMA== Received: from BN8NAM11FT016.eop-nam11.prod.protection.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:fc4b::51) by BN8NAM11HT133.eop-nam11.prod.protection.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:fc4b::427) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3153.24; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 14:00:33 +0000 Received: from SN6PR04MB5021.namprd04.prod.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:fc4b::49) by BN8NAM11FT016.mail.protection.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:fc4b::97) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3153.24 via Frontend Transport; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 14:00:33 +0000 X-IncomingTopHeaderMarker: OriginalChecksum:DE0C8CD15DEDA7C3BA8F95296A359A4267ACC0F1D1EC5E3248D246AE25ADC869; UpperCasedChecksum:6794310DBA2A41FE0300F18D10E0921C7B552AB45488A98F7848A3BD7378ECCA; SizeAsReceived:8131; Count:52 Received: from SN6PR04MB5021.namprd04.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::190c:a663:5f5c:8264]) by SN6PR04MB5021.namprd04.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::190c:a663:5f5c:8264%5]) with mapi id 15.20.3153.023; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 14:00:32 +0000 X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.102.3 at scorpio.seibercom.net Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2020 10:00:13 -0400 From: Carmel To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Updating py27-* ports Message-ID: Reply-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Organization: seibercom NET X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.5 (GTK+ 2.24.32; amd64-portbld-freebsd11.4) Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; boundary="Sig_/SghXpCJzRDrfVvu74En2s5c"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-ClientProxiedBy: MN2PR11CA0016.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:208:23b::21) To SN6PR04MB5021.namprd04.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:805:9f::32) X-Microsoft-Original-Message-ID: <20200704100013.18819383@scorpio.seibercom.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MS-Exchange-MessageSentRepresentingType: 1 Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (174.109.231.236) by MN2PR11CA0016.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:208:23b::21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3153.23 via Frontend Transport; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 14:00:31 +0000 Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49zYPc0hWNz2Fn1 for ; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 10:00:20 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.102.3 at scorpio.seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.5 (GTK+ 2.24.32; amd64-portbld-freebsd11.4) X-Microsoft-Original-Message-ID: <20200704100013.18819383@scorpio.seibercom.net> X-TMN: [1FXOGx4fbx34rSNNY3V9lMA4zBD7uZC8/F9P9wYAuFk=] X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email X-IncomingHeaderCount: 52 X-EOPAttributedMessage: 0 X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: 5cfc54cf-160b-498b-964e-08d820229d43 X-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: BN8NAM11HT133: X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0; X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info: LmIbT/+6lmwGqDBM4nRXuNPOYR0vXpsB2njfhGxTONoHcseTxCAl0tpiV17IhbYNNXoCLUJtAukO7yOLLLY5TDc6K3eBap1OQRgRX4ykEApe/b48/KozAy/7514126KqvpAJwAfOcG7+il7R34o4YSKBR/VcJh/YAYf2ih8IEXfK75qeQdbLM8YlGO8ZRqn4K/6Stv8hDBHNSXPqK6A9iw== X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:0; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:SN6PR04MB5021.namprd04.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFTY:; SFS:; DIR:OUT; SFP:1901; X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData: a4FrJl/eAzO/wTeoQ68RXqWUdPNGHbZeNmLhP6FP3PK0STXzvXZP1sfsAkaJb8BkzJQH+MI/byqASR3v4VQMo9ZCer9VhSyrPbgFQIIMHxuuuq1udNzmdEhOj3YJi0S7Ne2Crz/vspqVzhHxFeG1OQ== X-OriginatorOrg: outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 5cfc54cf-160b-498b-964e-08d820229d43 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 Jul 2020 14:00:32.4737 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: BN8NAM11FT016.eop-nam11.prod.protection.outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Internet X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BN8NAM11HT133 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49zYPv4lKvz3TvD X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=outlook.com header.s=selector1 header.b=J5MohWUS; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=outlook.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of carmel_ny@outlook.com designates 40.92.18.72 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=carmel_ny@outlook.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.50 / 15.00]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[outlook.com]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:40.92.0.0/15]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; HAS_ORG_HEADER(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[outlook.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[outlook.com,none]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.40)[-0.402]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[174.109.231.236:received]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[outlook.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:8075, ipnet:40.80.0.0/12, country:US]; REPLYTO_EQ_TO_ADDR(5.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[outlook.com:dkim]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.01)[-1.011]; RCVD_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[6]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[outlook.com:s=selector1]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.99)[-0.987]; MIME_GOOD(-0.20)[multipart/signed,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; ARC_ALLOW(-1.00)[microsoft.com:s=arcselector9901:i=1]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[40.92.18.72:from]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[40.92.18.72:from] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Jul 2020 14:00:37 -0000 --Sig_/SghXpCJzRDrfVvu74En2s5c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I use 'poudriere' to maintain my ports. I still have a few ports that depend on the depreciated py27. What is the recommended method to update these ports? I was thinking of placing this in the "poudriere.d/make.conf" file: DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=3Dpython=3D3.7 DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=3Dpython2=3D3.7 DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=3Dpython3=3D3.7 and then rebuild all of my ports. Would that be sufficient, or even correct? Thanks! --=20 Carmel --Sig_/SghXpCJzRDrfVvu74En2s5c Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEIQb/tTwl6I1ueEVtOHMGOIfexWQFAl8Ai20ACgkQOHMGOIfe xWSpFQgAgTEjat+jmiXnEco3YEXsokCUyfeVeM4y0LI8OFz3f6UsNKQwq6t6Bjej 9k8slyD2sIguOhTCikpheALWzwJdjsB+CpQCcva9wCj6563jSJBgHvS/gaLaEX+o hxe07wlK9yDJaAnhHJFKODrg7yycucEL76s6jcwHoDiA1q3VXG6JgW/Yel4C1KIE gRUD6qVAx+VJFg0euZ6UZqaHjLMLTLoAfDnuy320YhIC/FfaGhsf3j/RX8YYccRL OZIBHrgE44LgLcsSFiJxw1raHLS238OCBd0WdyB97czhETLm3zjAeGqESz8pjPt1 rNwhdeffK7CXpoAoc2cCqSjQhyYICQ== =h0mm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/SghXpCJzRDrfVvu74En2s5c-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Jul 4 14:11:32 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD1D734F45E for ; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 14:11:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@opsec.eu) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49zYfX4h7Wz3VfY for ; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 14:11:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@opsec.eu) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.92.3 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1jrit7-000GMI-DD for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Sat, 04 Jul 2020 16:11:29 +0200 Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2020 16:11:29 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Updating py27-* ports Message-ID: <20200704141129.GH39563@home.opsec.eu> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49zYfX4h7Wz3VfY X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:12502, ipnet:2001:14f8::/32, country:DE] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Jul 2020 14:11:32 -0000 Hi! > I use 'poudriere' to maintain my ports. I still have a few ports that > depend on the depreciated py27. What is the recommended method to > update these ports? I was thinking of placing this in the > "poudriere.d/make.conf" file: > > DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=python=3.7 > DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=python2=3.7 > DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=python3=3.7 > > and then rebuild all of my ports. Would that be sufficient, or even > correct? I used this in poudriere: DEFAULT_VERSIONS=python=3.7 python3=3.7 So I did not use python2=3.7 -- which will probably not work. That worked good enough that I did not investigate any further. -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 Now what ? From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Jul 4 14:30:24 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C763434FFC7 for ; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 14:30:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carmel_ny@outlook.com) Received: from NAM11-BN8-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bn8nam11olkn2100.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.92.20.100]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.protection.outlook.com", Issuer "GlobalSign Organization Validation CA - SHA256 - G3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49zZ4G4yj6z3WWk for ; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 14:30:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carmel_ny@outlook.com) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=MI538Fol7ne1EQCPtJH+hvCqeEq7eOpfzEtH9//WGsnt+kx+ERBMQOsqAxYPGMkosUTt82kKdIikkUVIFd/qT4ILOv0mmIGVSsS1baTkKH+Hm4p5gTTE4oWM1nLKCi/EPw/pHv7wnFyP9dZm/RckdRtgXpt2V8v3Sl25t2ZEAL8j58cJypKx2dnL8CTRwGSpUQ1qcgolqexmx/1Lrz85G6NF81VBjwaZm6THiOxIrl3YLxuGnpQUi49wT8vGTDV0MiFJgUO2RJf6YEL2V5RaO8pgelF5kyQa4MrCc/h31tnlmqETmP9XyxhlFmgVz1/IXFxTrvtxuBIAScQJkrh0QA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=8opBSgF41xJ+fHwO6goNx9LAiB4aaEGSYqIs4wODTyQ=; b=kF/RKEfiCWEZFyWbr2V5UUratYLO5GbY9BuirrXjgQSe5fLDDBT02ZNtXTJfQJ9cdH3FAcZqSloAXlCiD95rBWXeo9dcaY1K3DDBgSUIBRYcfPh+RYE+dkRFutzWbTuO8SfcQKpg7iLVxKZel3TtjGlT8cKiKaQoMzacpfQUl0oXE/HmEFl4Trtze31AU9Wo3YSATEpAQ8XdYNt2020eZwWJOXsE5L9htZ+uvN7ZqI1DeKxg3WNVbxn2ouBWxsL/zjGJNpYH+Wb6qvlOc/yP8SJEDMrqiR8Q47ZN8wK2Nt4EQz/+NkNNwmsP8/JurVasGQQ6iOLm12k+9AyCeonE3A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=none; dmarc=none; dkim=none; arc=none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=outlook.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=8opBSgF41xJ+fHwO6goNx9LAiB4aaEGSYqIs4wODTyQ=; b=S0dtM0S5jCa5tEqKpK4R2rchP7mx52RR/ldxX/B/xy9Ci03tGvyfhSEVN5RXNEi/L9h7v51PjRIyAjEiHP6z0i3MeUSKjGFfTKUld/MoabWOlnCOMTE0nQVR0GfKmHmZIlOhUVJ9vj7N529JVI+NNIH/MEK3a8Ag1s7y+TRQpsylCsFNm7Vj7BxMDk2NfHAk7+1WO8kguGooRpO3ErrlaeKMshEGznpw/+kT/GgHg+rUbwG5PJkBciznW+RxM/duY8/iu1dl/gqoPlIbVlbv4HpK5hkt6tnbFbxG92pmgkzK+J1wBISU9/+pdigM2fMz+nVawC80faW8RcgFOJdX6A== Received: from BN8NAM11FT045.eop-nam11.prod.protection.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:fc4b::51) by BN8NAM11HT224.eop-nam11.prod.protection.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:fc4b::180) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3153.24; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 14:30:21 +0000 Received: from SN6PR04MB5021.namprd04.prod.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:fc4b::45) by BN8NAM11FT045.mail.protection.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:fc4b::303) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3153.24 via Frontend Transport; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 14:30:21 +0000 X-IncomingTopHeaderMarker: OriginalChecksum:1B4635F098A8DF4AEFBAA7ABA8439027941298C2029EEB7F8FC89E9A5F8505BE; UpperCasedChecksum:FAFCDEF45C55C67A32E6C4A9A3317E9F7E55395B5CBEAC2B006D8FF4CDF7A92A; SizeAsReceived:8308; Count:54 Received: from SN6PR04MB5021.namprd04.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::190c:a663:5f5c:8264]) by SN6PR04MB5021.namprd04.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::190c:a663:5f5c:8264%5]) with mapi id 15.20.3153.023; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 14:30:21 +0000 X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.102.3 at scorpio.seibercom.net Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2020 10:30:13 -0400 From: Carmel To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Updating py27-* ports Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20200704141129.GH39563@home.opsec.eu> References: <20200704141129.GH39563@home.opsec.eu> Reply-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Organization: seibercom NET X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.5 (GTK+ 2.24.32; amd64-portbld-freebsd11.4) Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; boundary="Sig_/y5qyEKM+d6TpS/CJ=og+C+d"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-ClientProxiedBy: MN2PR15CA0052.namprd15.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:208:237::21) To SN6PR04MB5021.namprd04.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:805:9f::32) X-Microsoft-Original-Message-ID: <20200704103013.00f8fd9f@scorpio.seibercom.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MS-Exchange-MessageSentRepresentingType: 1 Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (174.109.231.236) by MN2PR15CA0052.namprd15.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:208:237::21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3153.24 via Frontend Transport; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 14:30:20 +0000 Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49zZ4C2C4bz2KmJ for ; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 10:30:19 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.102.3 at scorpio.seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.5 (GTK+ 2.24.32; amd64-portbld-freebsd11.4) X-Microsoft-Original-Message-ID: <20200704103013.00f8fd9f@scorpio.seibercom.net> X-TMN: [1WiC9SUeCmAHD1yCKVxuzLqQ7/xoI9dzBal/9cJKg24=] X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email X-IncomingHeaderCount: 54 X-EOPAttributedMessage: 0 X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: 31030a77-aac2-4a11-b9b6-08d82026c7fa X-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: BN8NAM11HT224: X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0; X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info: thavljPe+ZafRpxVCOIKrO6ZrOuUSTG2efK3BfQAuUwHGpf5+rwGP/2Ef6naYZpqP56qIVZYh0KFZ2x6jR7fNF2RrrIFG2AgyvhCdV7T/AC2W9F10b7+QDx1tIBirKatvzRB+OoZrA3DPYlf8fsazu/jSednXUwQRP8LWLw76z+QznDquJrAKI/XtwOy+V4Vr2tMxWdX40bOUz+mDmJlrw== X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:0; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:SN6PR04MB5021.namprd04.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFTY:; SFS:; DIR:OUT; SFP:1901; X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData: SKnQkGMqsjp0y/WuojS56z+gnS7R65FLqCuIpzDAY7l4pq1wATYUkjGTI5hngMKMcJyOuWqVFCscYSyVtrAUThb9fTVxUtgnoyiw2hHXc1z0HOOWGloa63BJAHtjFznuPPXbsFXk0SB8DUtiT/pyhg== X-OriginatorOrg: outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 31030a77-aac2-4a11-b9b6-08d82026c7fa X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 Jul 2020 14:30:21.2606 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: BN8NAM11FT045.eop-nam11.prod.protection.outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Internet X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BN8NAM11HT224 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49zZ4G4yj6z3WWk X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=outlook.com header.s=selector1 header.b=S0dtM0S5; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=outlook.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of carmel_ny@outlook.com designates 40.92.20.100 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=carmel_ny@outlook.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.43 / 15.00]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[outlook.com]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:40.92.0.0/15]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; HAS_ORG_HEADER(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[outlook.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[outlook.com,none]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.47)[-0.466]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[174.109.231.236:received]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[outlook.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:8075, ipnet:40.80.0.0/12, country:US]; REPLYTO_EQ_TO_ADDR(5.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[outlook.com:dkim]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.01)[-1.013]; RCVD_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[6]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[outlook.com:s=selector1]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.99)[-0.988]; MIME_GOOD(-0.20)[multipart/signed,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; ARC_ALLOW(-1.00)[microsoft.com:s=arcselector9901:i=1]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[40.92.20.100:from]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[40.92.20.100:from] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Jul 2020 14:30:24 -0000 --Sig_/y5qyEKM+d6TpS/CJ=og+C+d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 4 Jul 2020 16:11:29 +0200, Kurt Jaeger stated: >Hi! > >> I use 'poudriere' to maintain my ports. I still have a few ports that >> depend on the depreciated py27. What is the recommended method to >> update these ports? I was thinking of placing this in the >> "poudriere.d/make.conf" file: >>=20 >> DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=3Dpython=3D3.7 >> DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=3Dpython2=3D3.7 >> DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=3Dpython3=3D3.7 >>=20 >> and then rebuild all of my ports. Would that be sufficient, or even >> correct? =20 > >I used this in poudriere: > >DEFAULT_VERSIONS=3Dpython=3D3.7 python3=3D3.7 > >So I did not use python2=3D3.7 -- which will probably not work. > >That worked good enough that I did not investigate any further. I see that you are putting it all on one line. That is probably easier. I like the separate entries technique simply because I find it easier to read myself or quickly comment out an entry. What I have never been able to get a definitive answer to is exactly what the "+" does or if it is even needed, I have seen 'default_versions" both with and without it. Thanks! --=20 Carmel --Sig_/y5qyEKM+d6TpS/CJ=og+C+d Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEIQb/tTwl6I1ueEVtOHMGOIfexWQFAl8AknUACgkQOHMGOIfe xWTxXAf7BTaqOuPAH5veuOgLPINlax6qVD1ymbZweXulKudzgeXc6ttXPI9iT7R1 5CmsazcNcsWf68wSeRpD1WwnTUIGZH0/0erD1/eSsyE/AMhlWZA/pOjmSm1SB27Q kN+lWbxfyzDYD0K/bA4rmBKYeGHv6DGUqa+XSO56oR+Zz/15su8gePRXbNKGSc3c /FQ+Ev7WfxpdNJd1D5GBejKgYb2sgOBzFnOAu2yu2DSAfGiST/8eviYsiKuAEvEN 1+OcLege+Y6QC9uIEbag4fa4mU1vApkmBcUcsNE2+hcvMU3F6hpgZ4dknAu8tuKi vFJ31aJ2v62fnkbZm5mZma081T4z/Q== =dWv4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/y5qyEKM+d6TpS/CJ=og+C+d-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Jul 4 14:36:02 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FC17350382 for ; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 14:36:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@opsec.eu) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49zZBn5CZ9z3Wlq for ; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 14:36:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@opsec.eu) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.92.3 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1jrjGo-000Gtj-Cq for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Sat, 04 Jul 2020 16:35:58 +0200 Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2020 16:35:58 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Updating py27-* ports Message-ID: <20200704143558.GI39563@home.opsec.eu> References: <20200704141129.GH39563@home.opsec.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49zZBn5CZ9z3Wlq X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:12502, ipnet:2001:14f8::/32, country:DE] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Jul 2020 14:36:02 -0000 Hi! > >> update these ports? I was thinking of placing this in the > >> "poudriere.d/make.conf" file: [...] > What I have never been able to get a definitive answer to is exactly > what the "+" does or if it is even needed, I have seen > 'default_versions" both with and without it. The file is read by make during the build, so it's just part of the make syntax: man make says: += Append the value to the current value of the variable. -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 Now what ? From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Jul 4 14:44:40 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2C6B3506D1 for ; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 14:44:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pauamma@gundo.com) Received: from mail.gundo.com (gibson.gundo.com [75.145.166.65]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49zZNm2Gy1z3X95 for ; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 14:44:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pauamma@gundo.com) Received: from webmail.gundo.com (variax.gundo.com [75.145.166.70]) by mail.gundo.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4560A4C2480; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 09:44:39 -0500 (CDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Sat, 04 Jul 2020 16:44:39 +0200 From: Pau Amma To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Cc: Carmel Subject: Re: Updating py27-* ports In-Reply-To: References: <20200704141129.GH39563@home.opsec.eu> User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.4.1 Message-ID: <7aba543106af7b27ead61297c36d5e56@gundo.com> X-Sender: pauamma@gundo.com X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49zZNm2Gy1z3X95 X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7922, ipnet:75.144.0.0/13, country:US] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Jul 2020 14:44:40 -0000 On 2020-07-04 16:30, Carmel wrote: > What I have never been able to get a definitive answer to is exactly > what the "+" does or if it is even needed, I have seen > 'default_versions" both with and without it. The way I understand it, += appends. Thus: FOO=bar FOO+=quux will result in FOO having the value bar quux. Sometimes you will see += used even for what looks like the first of a series of assignments. This works because the initial value is the empty string, and is usually done to add to any non-empty default or initial value the variable may be getting elsewhere (now or later) or to future-proof against needing to add something before the first assignment and forgetting to change it from = to +=. See also, "Variable assignment modifiers" in the make manual page. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Jul 4 14:57:49 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53EC2350869 for ; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 14:57:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cmt@burggraben.net) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49zZgx0kR3z3Y30 for ; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 14:57:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cmt@burggraben.net) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 170B4350BC4; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 14:57:49 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16D16350AF0 for ; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 14:57:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cmt@burggraben.net) Received: from smtp.burggraben.net (smtp.burggraben.net [IPv6:2a01:4f8:140:510a::3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.burggraben.net", Issuer "Christoph Moench-Tegeder" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49zZgw1y9wz3Xv2 for ; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 14:57:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cmt@burggraben.net) Received: from elch.exwg.net (elch.exwg.net [IPv6:2001:470:7120:1:127b:44ff:fe4f:148d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "elch.exwg.net", Issuer "Christoph Moench-Tegeder" (not verified)) by smtp.burggraben.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 99409C00309; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 16:57:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: by elch.exwg.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 47D7D139903; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 16:57:45 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2020 16:57:45 +0200 From: Christoph Moench-Tegeder To: Kurt Jaeger Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: why does pkg try to install an older version of pkg ? Message-ID: <20200704145745.GA2354@elch.exwg.net> References: <20200704121238.GC39563@home.opsec.eu> <20200704123027.GB96403@elch.exwg.net> <20200704123652.GD39563@home.opsec.eu> <20200704125106.GC96403@elch.exwg.net> <20200704132841.GG39563@home.opsec.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200704132841.GG39563@home.opsec.eu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.14.5 (2020-06-23) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49zZgw1y9wz3Xv2 X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of cmt@burggraben.net designates 2a01:4f8:140:510a::3 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=cmt@burggraben.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.55 / 15.00]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.99)[-0.986]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a01:4f8:140:510a::3]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.01)[-1.009]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[burggraben.net]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED(-0.20)[2a01:4f8:140:510a::3:from]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.05)[-1.051]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:2a01:4f8::/29, country:DE]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Jul 2020 14:57:49 -0000 ## Kurt Jaeger (pi@opsec.eu): > > You could grab packagesite.txz from your repo, untar that and then > > grep '"name":"pkg"' packagesite.yaml > > Any brokenness in /var/db/pkg/ ? > > How would I recognize brokenness ? The files that should be there > are there. I'm afraid I have to go full Anna Karenina here: all happy machines are alike, each unhappy machine is unhappy in it's own way. I was thinking along the lines of left over files (yeah, that's a recurring theme here, I've spent way to much time chasing problems and finding editor backup files and the like in "include directory"/ "conf.d" like settings). Perhaps truncated files, broken sqlite database files, that stuff. > Status-update: Our package builder (repo.nepustil.net) finished > build for a new pkg-repo, and now the upgrade went through without > regression to pkg-1.10.5_1 8-} Then I'll assume that your repo was more stale than you thought :) Regards, Christoph -- Spare Space From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Jul 4 15:05:19 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C18D0350E47 for ; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 15:05:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cmt@burggraben.net) Received: from smtp.burggraben.net (smtp.burggraben.net [88.198.69.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.burggraben.net", Issuer "Christoph Moench-Tegeder" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49zZrb363Vz3YRB for ; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 15:05:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cmt@burggraben.net) Received: from elch.exwg.net (elch.exwg.net [IPv6:2001:470:7120:1:127b:44ff:fe4f:148d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "elch.exwg.net", Issuer "Christoph Moench-Tegeder" (not verified)) by smtp.burggraben.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6CDA8C00309 for ; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 17:05:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: by elch.exwg.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 19BF2139903; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 17:05:17 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2020 17:05:17 +0200 From: Christoph Moench-Tegeder To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Updating py27-* ports Message-ID: <20200704150517.GB2354@elch.exwg.net> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.14.5 (2020-06-23) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49zZrb363Vz3YRB X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:88.198.0.0/16, country:DE] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Jul 2020 15:05:19 -0000 ## Carmel (carmel_ny@outlook.com): > DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=python2=3.7 Forcing python 2 to be python 3.7 will probably break - as far as I can see, there're safeguards in place which will prevent this. In most cases, the python2 dependency is there because upstream hasn't updated their code yet. (That's the case for the build systems of firefox/thunderbird and chromium - all of them are work in progress upstream - and Gimp's python bindings, which are planned to be python-3-compatible with Gimp 3 expected later this year (at least it was, last time I checked)). Regards, Christoph -- Spare Space From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Jul 4 16:23:13 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2016E352AD5 for ; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 16:23:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kremels@kreme.com) Received: from mail.covisp.net (mail.covisp.net [65.121.55.42]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49zcZS5ZH2z3ctN for ; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 16:23:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kremels@kreme.com) From: "@lbutlr" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: Updating py27-* ports Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2020 10:23:09 -0600 References: <20200704141129.GH39563@home.opsec.eu> To: FreeBSD In-Reply-To: Message-Id: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3645.0.6.2.3) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49zcZS5ZH2z3ctN X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:209, ipnet:65.112.0.0/12, country:US] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Jul 2020 16:23:13 -0000 On 04 Jul 2020, at 08:30, Carmel wrote: > I see that you are putting it all on one line. That is probably = easier. > I like the separate entries technique simply because I find it easier > to read myself or quickly comment out an entry. I agree that separate lines have advantages. When making changes I tend = to go to multiple lines, then collapse back to a single line when I have = a stable set. > What I have never been able to get a definitive answer to is exactly > what the "+" does or if it is even needed, I have seen > 'default_versions" both with and without it. +=3D adds the option, =3D set it. DEFAULT_VERSIONS=3Dfoo bar sing $DEFAULT_VERSIONS foo bar sing DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=3Dmax $DEFAULT_VERSIONS foo bar sing max DEFAULT_VERSIONS=3Dsam $DEFAULT_VERSIONS sam --=20 Please to meet you, Rose. Now run for your life! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Jul 4 21:30:07 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E0BB358D92 for ; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 21:30:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tatsuki_makino@hotmail.com) Received: from APC01-PU1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-pu1apc01olkn0823.outbound.protection.outlook.com [IPv6:2a01:111:f400:febe::823]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.protection.outlook.com", Issuer "GlobalSign Organization Validation CA - SHA256 - G3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49zlNZ4LZCz48pL for ; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 21:30:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tatsuki_makino@hotmail.com) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=gITg5OoViGAkGOKThRZkPlQf4FfBV5p+0co+TYktMHpXCxC9acB31RRGSe+Itb6iyut/c5IsjDYdD6IKEjho5r3838xwP3zU8QUlx1e1oP7Br/skuUFO8tGl9THT1r02EzStQdRb96g7KNPsw1bKUzSt41zW25ArskVYP0e9jxzPZ/yseA/AjW4P7pJxE7GDOQrsdlOHOvWZizJZD9iEW7GSJWW6pjoSxqK4AvAmp/LLlM2GrWuGffPU2uZdozpwQ3e0/Ianti7Jo73PQdvD3YCSc86fAaidz1iR1L/LHVFSyHV5yiYzRYHHGcoGw+Gezx/ZQB5F9/Ml83/1DZVGjA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=oOo5o8QS5K28Hf1mPO1b8bHqmCr9txvL6sbHlRNY5so=; b=VKzaJ/sv2m/VQN8y65WqGB6+aXNrOY00IrNW/mphHV8hihHN4Yqn83BgiKVSTOYacxCgDYQ+k1jwCFIXW8A2CIB/J6GJnUGwfOJWKaYVh+aPcp6XzM94372w+mDNV7Ql103vP9GPVAbGo4MIoyAlIg/TY7Wgzao0urKL5u/EITyTx3enH3o5CJFkGFhC646dWjUNnvtPJP5D2phNSI/Yl11YZim09RSzBMMXjJiexW6bX0bcJgwUxn5zrGxuPUZePVyERc9szv8icgzTI6Vv0QEMIa50sjkIWn4o00tKBUBd8NvHJdsvJ8NhCnMOKt9BNsRDdHtAmQ6AtD4VOXGQZQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=none; dmarc=none; dkim=none; arc=none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hotmail.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=oOo5o8QS5K28Hf1mPO1b8bHqmCr9txvL6sbHlRNY5so=; b=SZ/yF8zeFGvuOo8W4LtT7rGFZAjsubzA15O5JBEuN88we+zvCe49909i2Gf5euhM9qkahGzHjVU/5CsqfwENooq5/l2kWl0M47LnCiZtUJgeE3fmOpPObpV8lsmN4E2EDls4mspU3CMgY50aUjTxq/c8Y+w2vQgdhiuLK4oIPYMVrqdTdDUcsfcdOtMOw1Y5Ki6k99GDidpY5y9gvihRiPyp8G7VM/xnTZmtib1LlwU89MoWsIgqGCuFu+cd9hfjpsL7ZtTfS9Eb219hM59SHIeXizI2Gm5fNFJheczcQYVlZhzCtmjc0oZHhN4AWVHX8uAjoDAG0VVa+bG8vIj6Mg== Received: from PU1APC01FT048.eop-APC01.prod.protection.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:7ebe::4c) by PU1APC01HT057.eop-APC01.prod.protection.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:7ebe::398) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3153.24; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 21:30:01 +0000 Received: from SL2PR06MB3225.apcprd06.prod.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:7ebe::4f) by PU1APC01FT048.mail.protection.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:7ebe::335) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3153.24 via Frontend Transport; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 21:30:01 +0000 X-IncomingTopHeaderMarker: OriginalChecksum:3C776DDB3D891B1D6C0023B1C8AC1E1364A9C55C8A6D2420B3D5A54FF0DE69FF; UpperCasedChecksum:BE597F4C3EA5FF16D6FBE513A1C30B8F9966BB256040688A4D43328E753939F1; SizeAsReceived:8805; Count:47 Received: from SL2PR06MB3225.apcprd06.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::719c:1d7a:5e81:61b8]) by SL2PR06MB3225.apcprd06.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::719c:1d7a:5e81:61b8%4]) with mapi id 15.20.3153.029; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 21:30:01 +0000 Subject: Re: Updating py27-* ports To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Carmel References: From: Tatsuki Makino Message-ID: Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2020 06:29:58 +0900 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/52.0 SeaMonkey/2.49.4 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ClientProxiedBy: TY2PR06CA0012.apcprd06.prod.outlook.com (2603:1096:404:42::24) To SL2PR06MB3225.apcprd06.prod.outlook.com (2603:1096:100:3b::19) X-Microsoft-Original-Message-ID: <7c15e311-81b4-8ab9-0d51-4837068136eb@hotmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MS-Exchange-MessageSentRepresentingType: 1 Received: from T4.test (218.226.145.18) by TY2PR06CA0012.apcprd06.prod.outlook.com (2603:1096:404:42::24) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3153.20 via Frontend Transport; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 21:30:00 +0000 X-Microsoft-Original-Message-ID: <7c15e311-81b4-8ab9-0d51-4837068136eb@hotmail.com> X-TMN: [LMWGpVGckNT6P0aoJO10/3NdCZQlH/yW] X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email X-IncomingHeaderCount: 47 X-EOPAttributedMessage: 0 X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: 08370026-3d3a-4081-3011-08d82061684f X-MS-Exchange-SLBlob-MailProps: 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 X-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: PU1APC01HT057: X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0; X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info: 8x4qtEYOk//M3VDtnU7jDWEr37kuMJDpTXgoICQ7Ib1EsAmHsIHX6/PIK61a8FGtkuC2/e7TVQyD5BZIw8NU+9qHCgQWXML4LRND0OYWBz3K5w8RN93EUks61MOsD7UTixd07U7mzLqdnSueUx9jgT9ySB9H8ErKnDndM5v/Z3cIwuljL/3kEPD/SQoPOOXHqjDgGbC7y2tDO8ts4WhnXQ== X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:0; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:SL2PR06MB3225.apcprd06.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFTY:; SFS:; DIR:OUT; SFP:1901; X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData: NBwhyWffGeJcN5CzEYLjGvXJAXxsSYMivsOX5i/cft6lwgDdQShKNehVb/F7tkqxtXuvFy41RGH6Ncd/XYGQu2ErUrv6zCZhX2xw7ytd6JXnkIpb1co4Bl2/6fLe9cDKoBx/mIj8FehqKhdCyBE4uA== X-OriginatorOrg: hotmail.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 08370026-3d3a-4081-3011-08d82061684f X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 Jul 2020 21:30:01.7996 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: PU1APC01FT048.eop-APC01.prod.protection.outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Internet X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-RMS-PersistedConsumerOrg: 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000 X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: PU1APC01HT057 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49zlNZ4LZCz48pL X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:8075, ipnet:2a01:111:f000::/36, country:US] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Jul 2020 21:30:07 -0000 Hello. As for packages that require py27-*, I think it's better to leave it to poudriere. Then I think the py27-* package can be cleaned up with the following command. # If you are running poudriere bulk as follows. # poudriere bulk -f ~/pkglist -j name poudriere pkgclean -f ~/pkglist -j name Regards.