From owner-freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Sun Aug 2 01:36:25 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-virtualization@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 521B936A46E for ; Sun, 2 Aug 2020 01:36:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jtubnor@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wm1-f44.google.com (mail-wm1-f44.google.com [209.85.128.44]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BK3Wq6xxnz3cx9 for ; Sun, 2 Aug 2020 01:36:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jtubnor@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wm1-f44.google.com with SMTP id q76so11189817wme.4 for ; Sat, 01 Aug 2020 18:36:23 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=I2Rv2KfWRz3pa5nFJIKacSje+hOoYAXMd4UEqw1Xhvo=; b=mZaMRJxzxWsvAQ6+nWb0VW/AsS6l8IgS3ykWBjZ02LwZ66h2/hD+UDo7KvnIUxb6oE A09/3MiAsdSCBHCOAq8cAfBhg3c6NwJyY/Ci/FLBhFtmf+LMU91AZBw3aRLQkFNHXir1 bHP1O5h7AfrcGpTOMSlfIgo3Sd/MTuhVVOvmnHT9vz/OLcxh2EXqr5/3BDM7gxjtr7Wf uAKqXIshmPIiIrqspRG3l6T5Iqy72iAflwXBrGFkbKXRGbjA5qHUMN/UvMB9CE9Mlcj7 Mv1MjSwW8PqtIWhY8b9OhMY9LIbDro2YtnMXmjyiCjJd3QfEQ6HDKGhKfLar61iuSwoD at9w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532wqtjxm2NV7f4PuEw7S2Q8Rt0CQ4MHtDHiVtORTqkgxWS9yVHl Cfb1aqtp/vLH+0hGPyUd6ZEbUslW6O+I8Zl5IaKBng== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy5+Q1uIvxTCgjRq9P5ItWRuvCp6HN7vLkNHuP9e1fQcc021qF+QMhy5za80+EzsmwHQt948D8HmgflaBUaG1U= X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:2904:: with SMTP id i4mr9402216wmd.126.1596332182061; Sat, 01 Aug 2020 18:36:22 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200801145144.7bf342d9@sunflower.int.arc7.info> In-Reply-To: <20200801145144.7bf342d9@sunflower.int.arc7.info> From: Jason Tubnor Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2020 11:36:09 +1000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Restricting IP ranges for guests over tap devices To: Mark Raynsford Cc: "freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BK3Wq6xxnz3cx9 X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of jtubnor@gmail.com designates 209.85.128.44 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=jtubnor@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.22 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_SOME(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:209.85.128.0/17:c]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[org.freebsd.virtualization]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[tubnor.net]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.97)[-0.972]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.52)[-0.523]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[209.85.128.44:from]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.73)[-0.726]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[jason@tubnor.net,jtubnor@gmail.com]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[209.85.128.44:from]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:209.85.128.0/17, country:US]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[jason@tubnor.net,jtubnor@gmail.com] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.33 X-BeenThere: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion of various virtualization techniques FreeBSD supports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Aug 2020 01:36:25 -0000 On Sun, 2 Aug 2020 at 00:51, Mark Raynsford via freebsd-virtualization < freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org> wrote: > Hello! > > Let's say I have a machine running a few dozen bhyve guests. Each bhyve > guest gets its own tap device, and all of the tap devices are connected > to a bridge. > > Everything works fine. I can write pf rules that control access between > each guest, and between each guest and the world. I can't directly > observe the IP addresses that the guests have assigned to the tap > devices I gave them, but if I know the addresses beforehand, I can for > example write pf rules that say things like: > > block log all > pass in on tap23 proto tcp \ > from any to $guest_23_ip port ssh modulate state > > That then means that even if the guest is compromised and tries to bind > a server to another address, the pf rules won't allow anyone else to > actually connect to it. > > The good thing about this is also the bad thing about this; I have to > write specific rules that say "only allow access to this specific IP > via this specific tap device". Over dozens of guests, that can multiply > to hundreds of laboriously maintained rules. > > Is there some more general way I can supply a mapping between tap > devices and allowed addresses? Remember that pf can't see the guest > addresses on the host sides of the tap devices, so I can't use the > (device) syntax to expand to "the address of a NIC called 'device'". > > > Treat the tap interface as a bridge and only define the destination port. That way you are able to protect the guest from the host without knowing the guest IP address. I'd do it a bit differently though. I'd treat the bridge that everything is tapped into as being a hostile environment. As such, each guest would protect itself as if you had a VPN on the public internet, using the guests built-in firewall. Another way is isolating each guest or bunch of guests on private VLANs and then protect these subnets on the host. Cheers, Jason. From owner-freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Sun Aug 2 12:45:40 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-virtualization@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1571D37BEE8 for ; Sun, 2 Aug 2020 12:45:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from SRS0=q+5W=BM=quip.cz=000.fbsd@elsa.codelab.cz) Received: from elsa.codelab.cz (elsa.codelab.cz [94.124.105.4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BKLN21rzXz4R6l for ; Sun, 2 Aug 2020 12:45:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from SRS0=q+5W=BM=quip.cz=000.fbsd@elsa.codelab.cz) Received: from elsa.codelab.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by elsa.codelab.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BADC28416 for ; Sun, 2 Aug 2020 14:45:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: from illbsd.quip.test (ip-62-24-92-232.net.upcbroadband.cz [62.24.92.232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by elsa.codelab.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1494B28411 for ; Sun, 2 Aug 2020 14:45:29 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: Restricting IP ranges for guests over tap devices To: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org References: <20200801145144.7bf342d9@sunflower.int.arc7.info> From: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> Message-ID: <7acfc19f-f58f-ed55-0ed5-162c3ef23d87@quip.cz> Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2020 14:45:26 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BKLN21rzXz4R6l X-Spamd-Bar: ++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of SRS0=q@elsa.codelab.cz has no SPF policy when checking 94.124.105.4) smtp.mailfrom=SRS0=q@elsa.codelab.cz X-Spamd-Result: default: False [2.50 / 15.00]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.16)[0.164]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.75)[0.747]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.39)[0.388]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[quip.cz]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[000.fbsd@quip.cz,SRS0=q@elsa.codelab.cz]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:42000, ipnet:94.124.104.0/21, country:CZ]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[5W=BM=quip.cz=000.fbsd]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[000.fbsd@quip.cz,SRS0=q@elsa.codelab.cz] X-BeenThere: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion of various virtualization techniques FreeBSD supports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Aug 2020 12:45:40 -0000 On 02/08/2020 03:36, Jason Tubnor wrote: > On Sun, 2 Aug 2020 at 00:51, Mark Raynsford via freebsd-virtualization < > freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org> wrote: > >> Hello! >> >> Let's say I have a machine running a few dozen bhyve guests. Each bhyve >> guest gets its own tap device, and all of the tap devices are connected >> to a bridge. >> >> Everything works fine. I can write pf rules that control access between >> each guest, and between each guest and the world. I can't directly >> observe the IP addresses that the guests have assigned to the tap >> devices I gave them, but if I know the addresses beforehand, I can for >> example write pf rules that say things like: >> >> block log all >> pass in on tap23 proto tcp \ >> from any to $guest_23_ip port ssh modulate state >> >> That then means that even if the guest is compromised and tries to bind >> a server to another address, the pf rules won't allow anyone else to >> actually connect to it. >> >> The good thing about this is also the bad thing about this; I have to >> write specific rules that say "only allow access to this specific IP >> via this specific tap device". Over dozens of guests, that can multiply >> to hundreds of laboriously maintained rules. >> >> Is there some more general way I can supply a mapping between tap >> devices and allowed addresses? Remember that pf can't see the guest >> addresses on the host sides of the tap devices, so I can't use the >> (device) syntax to expand to "the address of a NIC called 'device'". >> >> >> > Treat the tap interface as a bridge and only define the destination port. > That way you are able to protect the guest from the host without knowing > the guest IP address. > > I'd do it a bit differently though. I'd treat the bridge that everything > is tapped into as being a hostile environment. As such, each guest would > protect itself as if you had a VPN on the public internet, using the guests > built-in firewall. > > Another way is isolating each guest or bunch of guests on private VLANs and > then protect these subnets on the host. For me the more serious issue is that malicious guest can assign IP of another guest or the main host and cause some collisions or malfunctions. I am looking for the right solution for a long time. Miroslav Lachman From owner-freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Sun Aug 2 21:00:29 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-virtualization@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 335B03A7837 for ; Sun, 2 Aug 2020 21:00:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BKYM10Mx6z3gky for ; Sun, 2 Aug 2020 21:00:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 0C95F3A7903; Sun, 2 Aug 2020 21:00:29 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: virtualization@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BE9C3A75F2 for ; Sun, 2 Aug 2020 21:00:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BKYM05FFGz3gw9 for ; Sun, 2 Aug 2020 21:00:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 988F49931 for ; Sun, 2 Aug 2020 21:00:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 072L0SK7045968 for ; Sun, 2 Aug 2020 21:00:28 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from bugzilla@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 072L0SXg045967 for virtualization@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 2 Aug 2020 21:00:28 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <202008022100.072L0SXg045967@kenobi.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: bugzilla set sender to bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org To: virtualization@FreeBSD.org Subject: Problem reports for virtualization@FreeBSD.org that need special attention Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2020 21:00:28 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.33 X-BeenThere: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion of various virtualization techniques FreeBSD supports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Aug 2020 21:00:29 -0000 To view an individual PR, use: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=(Bug Id). The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users, which need special attention. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and obsolete releases. Status | Bug Id | Description ------------+-----------+--------------------------------------------------- New | 240945 | [hyper-v] [netvsc] hn network driver incorrectly 1 problems total for which you should take action. From owner-freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Mon Aug 3 09:17:59 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-virtualization@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4999373EF8; Mon, 3 Aug 2020 09:17:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aryeh.friedman@gmail.com) Received: from mail-il1-x12d.google.com (mail-il1-x12d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::12d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BKsjz16JJz4XZG; Mon, 3 Aug 2020 09:17:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aryeh.friedman@gmail.com) Received: by mail-il1-x12d.google.com with SMTP id z17so15397798ill.6; Mon, 03 Aug 2020 02:17:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=2Ks35js7NM4PV7FIMpw/M5gXXfIQ4xVqyQCgr4trAKk=; b=IIclv7zIIisWGNNTMuIXn94lA3uJZM6vFiDWnGpPfU7SZ7xEEDYdREMvAysfXSboN2 Q9K18K3oCwBFZGcm8k/ghVxUUb/Ij4RrNcHYjO80eJbNr8wB7CCY3r8D0oXwn1l2XnAq UgYjr615Pqup4nqN5xrtLSmIxu9Zug0ZFV68jwpFW2xLzntmcJROjhIvE18M1lxQOZTI qCxt7uaaWJ4Z9hegi9IibMAyCvN4C7dXUnSvt2T2QStlT/Oc2WBu9jroDf9j2CNnt5L3 +TsBlO5svltRi6wNTfn6KVCCRc04pI1+dAAGsTW99+xArEYtys/Fe3E25km6NuPWa5Sz 4phw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=2Ks35js7NM4PV7FIMpw/M5gXXfIQ4xVqyQCgr4trAKk=; b=ddHZYOs8wnMOfUhaKreeunaiyliIJkTZi7KxQ7OKOXyU+3tcMPjU3f/Ub4xQuOpXwj yssGM5q5fhpBcrX6/V/IakU0eorh0fefvBsYTjvDZ2GZwvTvLR84hruJksmnvKt1Fr5D 9ymUzedUi/kLO1fuFFV1NoIhyAlE0NBUQVxAQzUxROLtGChuHZQCnBMLlhgCq2UZWm4W iup/XTl34Kh5B/SOziQdZRBV0YQMONRs/CouyJJo1jeuxxwpH46glLBZFPthgrHO90CW DABFC96LzLibe3BLAAukAOmJ2FREJZkxCG8/GTLGUz90Cm3e0lQrpkOXgcr26P7QryPm MbEg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5304qMVYaUzq90rNsKE4tstzbrBxftV4p48Mvv0s2lurd+qc976m j9odAK8eIs1dtgkASy0iNfBKe9tf8Vm8UTSsGsSW4Px/ X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJydmZBSBzBLB6/wNs4g9WJ/c3m7X60C4PIbDAtRpST+Jq5+3Flm4EwuKpP2OkcldAkUt17uK7yIpzMtnQwnkb4= X-Received: by 2002:a92:aa84:: with SMTP id p4mr15617769ill.185.1596446277772; Mon, 03 Aug 2020 02:17:57 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Aryeh Friedman Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2020 05:17:46 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: When will vbox 6.X have a working port? To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org, "freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BKsjz16JJz4XZG X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=IIclv7zI; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of aryehfriedman@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::12d as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=aryehfriedman@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.86 / 15.00]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_SOME(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com:dkim]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.001]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.03)[-1.028]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::12d:from]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.83)[-0.835]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.33 X-BeenThere: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion of various virtualization techniques FreeBSD supports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2020 09:18:00 -0000 I have tried every patch I can find in bug.freebsd.org for 6.0.12 and 6.1X they all fail to compile and/or mess my graphics up even more than 5.2 (with all it's really strange rendering). So when is the port going to be usable by mere mortals? -- Aryeh M. Friedman, Lead Developer, http://www.PetiteCloud.org From owner-freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Mon Aug 3 15:49:54 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-virtualization@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2468C37DFEA for ; Mon, 3 Aug 2020 15:49:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lobo@bsd.com.br) Received: from mail-io1-xd2d.google.com (mail-io1-xd2d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BL2Q76zg8z414j for ; Mon, 3 Aug 2020 15:49:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lobo@bsd.com.br) Received: by mail-io1-xd2d.google.com with SMTP id w12so25386190iom.4 for ; Mon, 03 Aug 2020 08:49:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bsd.com.br; s=capeta; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=ZPAajW8HaXt5dqJE4cs+oTktPBBpDNeBuaxCUcIgdRI=; b=KRxRSBtUQF4CjVMvsiZG1r93Q0x1yyVfu594MXPLu7WWUBJp5KrE2nMU1TB1StiQjn XlQGoicGEOlFfMwm/rzkSO915yj8aGrEQeO8KKD8soozwLwhW7f6IUskEQ0ly4oV1dVn J8OfxiWcrWKFM1Yykx2cWJ3gEmTGl5LvR5358= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ZPAajW8HaXt5dqJE4cs+oTktPBBpDNeBuaxCUcIgdRI=; b=ACs6L32BkOBl019q14OvY6meVmQj2MMfTmd2xomwTirtuud1mpK4oJPRT+yqvwUVI2 rnDKp6zvyv513D+PdnMJlem4ga1hOmMTxPViSYYi/B2+8ZDXnaOupSIULuuSuIdGzP4x +ee7BnlwX79XsEb/bcDO5zt0sqqXY7WZ43fQKEzJBXqWZZk1Ivz9rZfFo04+Q7cgSMg2 +CKVWUW7v+nzcY5gp3C6FCJueIhex5h2ZuKhkVK+ZRG7YSIIexgEwQ3mYbftUs2hQTLj CyOszGMacxUqfEx61B8NaMbcrF4yNKVSlws0Bf6GsHe3aNomoX6CWsq+zI6+YHFCOvMn Bxiw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533kTZ8hESkB4ofOcCGumqOEO22IRMnO7jjGOBjbQC9c/ORCLbiF sUMD3JU9RKdaAAqWOS0BvGe9W25sK3J1f8n9/RnN/A== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJycjfECkR4g7wtOwtfqL+RDQu2JsGLUL0tVx5PqHTjqsJWoKDDdOZrGrMts5yJi8nmd3uj3XWwUV+Kf3+Mg31E= X-Received: by 2002:a02:ac4:: with SMTP id 187mr276555jaw.71.1596469790721; Mon, 03 Aug 2020 08:49:50 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Mario Lobo Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2020 12:49:40 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: When will vbox 6.X have a working port? To: Aryeh Friedman Cc: "freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org" , "freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BL2Q76zg8z414j X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=bsd.com.br header.s=capeta header.b=KRxRSBtU; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of lobo@bsd.com.br designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2d as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=lobo@bsd.com.br X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.16 / 15.00]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_SOME(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[bsd.com.br:s=capeta]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.03)[-1.033]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[bsd.com.br]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.01)[-1.005]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[bsd.com.br:+]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.62)[-0.622]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2d:from]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[gmail.com]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.33 X-BeenThere: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion of various virtualization techniques FreeBSD supports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2020 15:49:54 -0000 On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 6:18 AM Aryeh Friedman wrote: > I have tried every patch I can find in bug.freebsd.org for 6.0.12 and 6.1X > they all fail to compile and/or mess my graphics up even more than 5.2 > (with all it's really strange rendering). So when is the port going to be > usable by mere mortals? > > -- > Aryeh M. Friedman, Lead Developer, http://www.PetiteCloud.org > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-emulation-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Hi Aryeh; I've been wrestling with this for quite a while without success. You can follow the whole via crucis here: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234878 The last time I've got any VBox 6 working was on: FreeBSD 11.3-STABLE #0 r353691 virtualbox-ose-6.0.8 General-purpose full virtualizer for x86 hardware virtualbox-ose-kmod-6.0.8 VirtualBox kernel module for FreeBSD This same port doesn't compile and/or runs on any FreeBSD above the above version -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since version 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio.... YET!!] From owner-freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Thu Aug 6 01:03:50 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-virtualization@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 558763AE01B for ; Thu, 6 Aug 2020 01:03:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BMVcQ1dQ9z4SM0 for ; Thu, 6 Aug 2020 01:03:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 363C03ADC63; Thu, 6 Aug 2020 01:03:50 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: virtualization@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35FDF3AE1B1 for ; Thu, 6 Aug 2020 01:03:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BMVcQ0fcSz4Sjm for ; Thu, 6 Aug 2020 01:03:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE83B1F055 for ; Thu, 6 Aug 2020 01:03:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 07613nIP034609 for ; Thu, 6 Aug 2020 01:03:49 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 07613n2P034608 for virtualization@FreeBSD.org; Thu, 6 Aug 2020 01:03:49 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: virtualization@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 248494] if_vmx(4) duplicate packets in netmap mode Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2020 01:03:50 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.1-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: linimon@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: virtualization@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: assigned_to Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion of various virtualization techniques FreeBSD supports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2020 01:03:50 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D248494 Mark Linimon changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|bugs@FreeBSD.org |virtualization@FreeBSD.org --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Thu Aug 6 21:33:28 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-virtualization@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E63A83AC2EB for ; Thu, 6 Aug 2020 21:33:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BN1vD5tpDz4f3b for ; Thu, 6 Aug 2020 21:33:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id CA12B3AC701; Thu, 6 Aug 2020 21:33:28 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: virtualization@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9D623AC627 for ; Thu, 6 Aug 2020 21:33:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BN1vD552Kz4f61 for ; Thu, 6 Aug 2020 21:33:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 92B62D2F5 for ; Thu, 6 Aug 2020 21:33:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 076LXSZO005436 for ; Thu, 6 Aug 2020 21:33:28 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from bugzilla@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 076LXSQe005435 for virtualization@FreeBSD.org; Thu, 6 Aug 2020 21:33:28 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: bugzilla set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: virtualization@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 248494] if_vmx(4) duplicate packets in netmap mode Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2020 21:33:28 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.1-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: commit-hook@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: virtualization@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion of various virtualization techniques FreeBSD supports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2020 21:33:29 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D248494 --- Comment #2 from commit-hook@FreeBSD.org --- A commit references this bug: Author: vmaffione Date: Thu Aug 6 21:32:26 UTC 2020 New revision: 363996 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/363996 Log: iflib: netmap: don't increment ifl_cidx on the wrong free list Netmap only uses free list 0 to keep it consistent with its one-to-one mapping between each netmap ring and a device RX (or TX) queue. However, the current iflib_netmap_rxsync() routine was mistakenly updating the ifl_cidx field of both free lists. PR: 248494 MFC after: 2 weeks Changes: head/sys/net/iflib.c --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Fri Aug 7 01:05:32 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-virtualization@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B42B3AF7DB for ; Fri, 7 Aug 2020 01:05:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BN6bv6Y9jz3Zhy for ; Fri, 7 Aug 2020 01:05:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id DF1513AF7DA; Fri, 7 Aug 2020 01:05:31 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: virtualization@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEDE53AF67C for ; Fri, 7 Aug 2020 01:05:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BN6bv5d26z3ZWs for ; Fri, 7 Aug 2020 01:05:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A4C1FFE53 for ; Fri, 7 Aug 2020 01:05:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 07715VWk040629 for ; Fri, 7 Aug 2020 01:05:31 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 07715Vu7040628 for virtualization@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 7 Aug 2020 01:05:31 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: virtualization@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 248494] if_vmx(4) duplicate packets in netmap mode Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2020 01:05:31 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.1-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: murat@balaban.io X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: virtualization@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion of various virtualization techniques FreeBSD supports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2020 01:05:32 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D248494 --- Comment #3 from Murat --- (In reply to commit-hook from comment #2) Hi Vincenzo, I guess the fix is not complete yet, right? Tested this commit today: still= the same. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Fri Aug 7 08:01:25 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-virtualization@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94AED3B4F19 for ; Fri, 7 Aug 2020 08:01:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danny@cs.huji.ac.il) Received: from kabab.cs.huji.ac.il (kabab.cs.huji.ac.il [132.65.116.210]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BNHqm3sllz47pB for ; Fri, 7 Aug 2020 08:01:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danny@cs.huji.ac.il) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cs.huji.ac.il; s=57791128; h=To:Date:Message-Id:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:From; bh=FlOzy+WZJI8wwIgKloF4RmoRyc2rwE2mi8+0KIOBvsQ=; b=sU8sJkbQ2MTgTqxAc9Jh8N1N+lUTWoEVpWyKW7u2umpfy8E1P3rG+EtXfNC6cage/QunQSk35/4hp6GUsC/RTKAHIq6wVRdpXR1I9Vr+aUfBPvsVHN43e8yC2CuoXORqFuO3N698cdKqw9OUmqE7iSaZiRgGnKrNiLynfFgV9ld35kVwRSr1iThNTQPANO2GG1CGMyEkQAEt0Ed78+hOeerwAVegkY0dzjSYJK1zP6GW7zECa51hfMItmRBLGN4zst9pPVxg0Lh8fQ6ogB+lxjzFM2Dwg9e9mqIog+5QOVkStzod5zzo6PQzd6zcG5DRPheszn3H9SBcvSeBfcrFAQ==; Received: from bach.cs.huji.ac.il ([132.65.80.20]) by kabab.cs.huji.ac.il with esmtp id 1k3xJX-000O8X-IS for freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org; Fri, 07 Aug 2020 11:01:19 +0300 From: Daniel Braniss Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.6\)) Subject: bhyve boot order? Message-Id: <807B5CE6-5408-4C35-A0A2-32044FC65CD8@cs.huji.ac.il> Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2020 11:01:19 +0300 To: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.6) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BNHqm3sllz47pB X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=cs.huji.ac.il header.s=57791128 header.b=sU8sJkbQ; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=huji.ac.il; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of danny@cs.huji.ac.il has no SPF policy when checking 132.65.116.210) smtp.mailfrom=danny@cs.huji.ac.il X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.26 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.98)[-0.976]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[cs.huji.ac.il:s=57791128]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.99)[-0.986]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[cs.huji.ac.il:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[huji.ac.il,none]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[132.65.116.210:from]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.00)[-0.002]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:378, ipnet:132.64.0.0/13, country:IL]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion of various virtualization techniques FreeBSD supports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2020 08:01:25 -0000 I got bhyve running mainly using vm (thanks Matt), and though I = succeeded to boot diskless, as soon as I configure a disk, it will boot of it. So Q: is there a =E2=80=98simple=E2=80=99 way to change/set the boot = order? I=E2=80=99m using the uefi boot. thanks, danny From owner-freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Fri Aug 7 17:56:57 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-virtualization@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 071D23706E5 for ; Fri, 7 Aug 2020 17:56:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BNY2w6VPYz3VGW for ; Fri, 7 Aug 2020 17:56:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id DD43F370719; Fri, 7 Aug 2020 17:56:56 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: virtualization@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD0AA370718 for ; Fri, 7 Aug 2020 17:56:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BNY2w5b1zz3Tr9 for ; Fri, 7 Aug 2020 17:56:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9FFDC1B778 for ; Fri, 7 Aug 2020 17:56:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 077HuugN052420 for ; Fri, 7 Aug 2020 17:56:56 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 077Huutp052419 for virtualization@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 7 Aug 2020 17:56:56 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: virtualization@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 248494] if_vmx(4) duplicate packets in netmap mode Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2020 17:56:56 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.1-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: vmaffione@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: virtualization@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion of various virtualization techniques FreeBSD supports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2020 17:56:57 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D248494 Vincenzo Maffione changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|New |Open --- Comment #4 from Vincenzo Maffione --- (In reply to Murat from comment #3) That is a first fix that I did while investigating. It's still not enough to render vmx(4) usable with netmap. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=