From owner-freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Mon Jan 6 09:43:42 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4D041FEF05 for ; Mon, 6 Jan 2020 09:43:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nd@syndicat.com) Received: from mail.syndicat.com (mail.syndicat.com [62.146.89.62]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47rrDY3Y4fz4Tq5 for ; Mon, 6 Jan 2020 09:43:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nd@syndicat.com) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:65335) by mail.syndicat.com with esmtp (Syndicat PostHamster 4.92.2) (envelope-from ) id 1ioOvC-0005bm-5e for freebsd-xen@freebsd.org; Mon, 06 Jan 2020 10:43:38 +0100 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at syndicat.com Received: from mail.syndicat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.syndicat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ueV4hCQy6VvC for ; Mon, 6 Jan 2020 10:43:37 +0100 (CET) Received: from p54b2ea60.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([84.178.234.96]:36712 helo=gongo.localnet) by mail.syndicat.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Syndicat PostHamster 4.92.2) (envelope-from ) id 1ioOvB-0003IZ-QA for freebsd-xen@freebsd.org; Mon, 06 Jan 2020 10:43:37 +0100 From: Niels Dettenbach To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 12.1 hypervisor management tools Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2020 10:43:38 +0100 Message-ID: <4568880.pk4Rc43uC5@gongo> Organization: Syndicat IT&Internet In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Report-Abuse-To: abuse@syndicat.com (see https://www.syndicat.com/kontakt/kontakte/) X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - mail.syndicat.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - syndicat.com X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 47rrDY3Y4fz4Tq5 X-Spamd-Bar: ---- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.28 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:62.146.89.56/29]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCVD_DKIM_ARC_DNSWL_MED(-0.50)[]; HAS_ORG_HEADER(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED(-0.20)[62.89.146.62.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.2]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[syndicat.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[syndicat.com,reject]; HAS_X_ANTIABUSE(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(0.42)[ipnet: 62.146.0.0/16(1.30), asn: 15598(0.82), country: DE(-0.02)]; CTE_CASE(0.50)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15598, ipnet:62.146.0.0/16, country:DE]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[syndicat.com:s=x]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_MED(-2.00)[syndicat.com.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.2]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-xen@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2020 09:43:43 -0000 Am Samstag, 4. Januar 2020, 18:32:26 CET schrieb Stefan Parvu: > We got a new server, where we plan to install FreeBSD 12.1 amd64 and use > Xen. Is there anything we could use as GUI management tools for Xen on > FreeBSD ? > > Im looking for some graphical user interface management software to allow > different people to create/manage different VMs on top of Xen/FreeBSD. hmmm, i darkly remember to worked with a virt-manager (remotely) years ago https://virt-manager.org/ over libvirt on Xen, but not on FreeBSD dom0 yet. virt-manager uses libvirt which seems "available" / buildable on FreeBSD: https://forums.freebsd.org/threads/libvirt-libxl-on-freebsd.51862/ see: https://virt-manager.org/ but at that time it was not "complete". I use / prefer console based tools / work for xen management until today which gives full access to xen's features - but this might help you for your needs. hth, best regards, niels. -- --- Niels Dettenbach Syndicat IT & Internet http://www.syndicat.com PGP: https://syndicat.com/pub_key.asc --- From owner-freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Mon Jan 6 10:35:01 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F17F1D044F for ; Mon, 6 Jan 2020 10:35:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from subbsd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lf1-x130.google.com (mail-lf1-x130.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::130]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47rsMl6bj2z4XgG for ; Mon, 6 Jan 2020 10:34:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from subbsd@gmail.com) Received: by mail-lf1-x130.google.com with SMTP id m30so36033607lfp.8 for ; Mon, 06 Jan 2020 02:34:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=3iunduNdX1JeqUpCBVKcEE6DDJ+opXmdXEY2a+yq0bU=; b=VbacR94h+uxo476LThUHOV0BL4bG1vU0RTs9oPVmW2cRU4xoH1Z8/mrRA03PLqCThE PVD8sAVh4ivCjWX6YCnrpw6hAznvvFTBIdQiEuEQJ7O3GNQVUHEQw897mEhBc/+Gbgn4 TgAQKGCtw4DwlVAF74deTklLUcAtV2ztOOtKbwnFMROFVPjr/qJHSMo+ESCPvhNiKveL aMShKX3HVv5RU9cYegzzGcrok2Q9JWqlDoQp3VzAc7Q8OIKrL9+SohjmGBr8RuA58EXS abCoFd7Xwg/O4/keixXRfHBj34Pow750PKkpa7/Y1rVjSMY3X1zc+exvgMT2I+/XWhWC PICA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=3iunduNdX1JeqUpCBVKcEE6DDJ+opXmdXEY2a+yq0bU=; b=Ysq1Xpa7JX1t+X+wm1zNYciKwzCqdRS95OYI9xQtTgzxWkqvLlM09kZWiGMKk4DL67 yfUwd21937dsHWmCNBq4133dtxkOlj3OUEbfbK1Cszh1S07p38gvfpIMP3ZJPMVxLbCx ezoi0L1NI3DH+xDeMjGdtfdLoQzQ3WOzHuQVyVyyXNU3kFqPYfuaG4Z6W48/Yxhfak8H t4GlcGQ1UPTgNcxMY2m+2OA8wflJXS1J2ewzuqT0feKzBLDc7qqdz3hJ+LzrNs06gf7S +sHDatf2x/Tj4LShDFqxHpX8uYLGnbgz97LWtQUkbiZvG5oquozNKN76bJYo8eOtFH+Y MNSw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUtLB4xHQ5vMUk5AOX1i7ZUpz9CiNJl/0YjL6ONt1V6fFn4pjol 1TzMlMCbcrDxdoUYdvarQvReUGHPn4CpPrzFwVfhw+Ea X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyTsNYDL6LcgJ7UHJxhVu3e5+AviBiFygriNgLFI7COphe7E+11PnspCKHqEmerqoPRVD4r0U1bLSw5t7lIyfo= X-Received: by 2002:ac2:55a8:: with SMTP id y8mr55746497lfg.117.1578306897879; Mon, 06 Jan 2020 02:34:57 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Subbsd Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2020 13:34:47 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: FreeBSD 12.1 hypervisor management tools To: Stefan Parvu Cc: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 47rsMl6bj2z4XgG X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=VbacR94h; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of subbsd@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4864:20::130 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=subbsd@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.00 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a00:1450:4000::/36:c]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-xen@freebsd.org]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; IP_SCORE_FREEMAIL(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[0.3.1.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.0.0.4.6.8.4.0.5.4.1.0.0.a.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; IP_SCORE(0.00)[ip: (-9.04), ipnet: 2a00:1450::/32(-2.61), asn: 15169(-1.86), country: US(-0.05)]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2a00:1450::/32, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0] X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2020 10:35:01 -0000 Hi, On Sat, Jan 4, 2020 at 8:32 PM Stefan Parvu wrote: > > Hi, > > We got a new server, where we plan to install FreeBSD 12.1 amd64 and use Xen. > Is there anything we could use as GUI management tools for Xen on FreeBSD ? > > Im looking for some graphical user interface management software to allow different people to create/manage > different VMs on top of Xen/FreeBSD. > > Thanks, > > Stefan Parvu > sparvu@kronometrix.org In addition to the virt-manager, we have CBSD[1]. It can manage XEN[2] -- [1] -- https://www.freshports.org/sysutils/cbsd/ [2] -- https://www.reddit.com/r/freebsd/comments/ehvxdb/freebsd_xen_live_migration_freebsd_guest_via_cbsd/ From owner-freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Mon Jan 6 10:38:59 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22E941D06C1 for ; Mon, 6 Jan 2020 10:38:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sparvu@kronometrix.org) Received: from mail.kronometrix.org (mail.kronometrix.org [95.85.46.90]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mail.kronometrix.org", Issuer "mail.kronometrix.org" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47rsSK6ddFz4Xwj for ; Mon, 6 Jan 2020 10:38:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sparvu@kronometrix.org) Received: from [192.168.1.172] (82-203-141-23.bb.dnainternet.fi [82.203.141.23]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.kronometrix.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id 006Acm3Z008280 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 6 Jan 2020 10:38:49 GMT (envelope-from sparvu@kronometrix.org) X-Authentication-Warning: mail.kronometrix.org: Host 82-203-141-23.bb.dnainternet.fi [82.203.141.23] claimed to be [192.168.1.172] From: Stefan Parvu Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.0 \(3608.40.2.2.4\)) Subject: Re: FreeBSD 12.1 hypervisor management tools Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2020 12:38:42 +0200 References: To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: Message-Id: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.40.2.2.4) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 47rsSK6ddFz4Xwj X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of sparvu@kronometrix.org designates 95.85.46.90 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=sparvu@kronometrix.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.28 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.59)[-0.594,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-xen@freebsd.org]; HAS_XAW(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.50)[-0.498,0]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[kronometrix.org]; IP_SCORE(0.61)[ip: (0.38), ipnet: 95.85.0.0/18(1.02), asn: 14061(1.69), country: US(-0.05)]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; ASN(0.00)[asn:14061, ipnet:95.85.0.0/18, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2020 10:38:59 -0000 Cheers, Okay, so there are some options. Will have a look on virt-manager and cbsd. thanks a lot for pointers Stefan Parvu sparvu@kronometrix.org From owner-freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Mon Jan 6 10:44:00 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BC431D09C8 for ; Mon, 6 Jan 2020 10:44:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sparvu@kronometrix.org) Received: from mail.kronometrix.org (mail.kronometrix.org [95.85.46.90]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mail.kronometrix.org", Issuer "mail.kronometrix.org" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47rsZ65gGsz4YHc for ; Mon, 6 Jan 2020 10:43:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sparvu@kronometrix.org) Received: from [192.168.1.172] (82-203-141-23.bb.dnainternet.fi [82.203.141.23]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.kronometrix.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id 006Ahud4008312 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 6 Jan 2020 10:43:57 GMT (envelope-from sparvu@kronometrix.org) X-Authentication-Warning: mail.kronometrix.org: Host 82-203-141-23.bb.dnainternet.fi [82.203.141.23] claimed to be [192.168.1.172] From: Stefan Parvu Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.0 \(3608.40.2.2.4\)) Subject: Xen performance on FreeBSD vs Linux Message-Id: <7E9802F1-172A-41A7-A110-C69A7D8D1192@kronometrix.org> Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2020 12:43:51 +0200 To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.40.2.2.4) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 47rsZ65gGsz4YHc X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of sparvu@kronometrix.org designates 95.85.46.90 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=sparvu@kronometrix.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.28 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.59)[-0.588,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-xen@freebsd.org]; HAS_XAW(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.50)[-0.497,0]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[kronometrix.org]; IP_SCORE(0.61)[ip: (0.38), ipnet: 95.85.0.0/18(1.01), asn: 14061(1.69), country: US(-0.05)]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; ASN(0.00)[asn:14061, ipnet:95.85.0.0/18, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2020 10:44:00 -0000 Hi, How Xen hypervisor compares in terms of performance (guest) on FreeBSD = vs Linux , using ZFS or UFS ? Are there any benchmarks or tests regarding this ? Thanks Stefan Parvu sparvu@kronometrix.org From owner-freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Wed Jan 8 15:41:24 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0D041F28C0 for ; Wed, 8 Jan 2020 15:41:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roger.pau@citrix.com) Received: from esa4.hc3370-68.iphmx.com (esa4.hc3370-68.iphmx.com [216.71.155.144]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "esa4.hc3370-68.iphmx.com", Issuer "HydrantID SSL ICA G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47tD4N1F0Dz3F1x for ; Wed, 8 Jan 2020 15:41:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roger.pau@citrix.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=citrix.com; s=securemail; t=1578498084; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=B5GKLB+VDjGG1OjQrnh2sRXCRD9X1bcz3VYhY0X6bOo=; b=TYQ8iSWHrM0lyDN6hZzvs8WwQk5UqQMgDv4qKV6ey5axmPoRmpVJJw+x /C87MhSdbEJVm0QDxJ96cy6LmDe/gTjxcMtGBydTqWqAPzj0EL2Ld2pJ4 BUAFIsBGKjrt3uPq847WA58srVah+T0qyz2KCY19yxGQsPi5nRY9Mwpiz U=; Received-SPF: None (esa4.hc3370-68.iphmx.com: no sender authenticity information available from domain of roger.pau@citrix.com) identity=pra; client-ip=162.221.158.21; receiver=esa4.hc3370-68.iphmx.com; envelope-from="roger.pau@citrix.com"; x-sender="roger.pau@citrix.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: Pass (esa4.hc3370-68.iphmx.com: domain of roger.pau@citrix.com designates 162.221.158.21 as permitted sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=162.221.158.21; receiver=esa4.hc3370-68.iphmx.com; envelope-from="roger.pau@citrix.com"; x-sender="roger.pau@citrix.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1"; x-record-text="v=spf1 ip4:209.167.231.154 ip4:178.63.86.133 ip4:195.66.111.40/30 ip4:85.115.9.32/28 ip4:199.102.83.4 ip4:192.28.146.160 ip4:192.28.146.107 ip4:216.52.6.88 ip4:216.52.6.188 ip4:162.221.158.21 ip4:162.221.156.83 ip4:168.245.78.127 ~all" Received-SPF: None (esa4.hc3370-68.iphmx.com: no sender authenticity information available from domain of postmaster@mail.citrix.com) identity=helo; client-ip=162.221.158.21; receiver=esa4.hc3370-68.iphmx.com; envelope-from="roger.pau@citrix.com"; x-sender="postmaster@mail.citrix.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible IronPort-SDR: nR2i8iY6iyZn7iuDYBUV2t3dQ7IRgB8DQso0Xx5l2r8xJc8kQ6XvrgpPSZMGAPn+kYNZotHtSL UgJa7q8IZ61ZLhAj6Y+DlkosqFWWsaZsN12VRiak7IoAPLwId7w3kFohru/8qOLHqsKgYTaUbc tpKNgcuV7lPc8mZxkvBLrDrHQAV4iEDSnl1ViS6K1PYy3ClWIcwJ0iFATy+iHlbhcvKSsrsdd2 lu1miLSGKokff9kCWvSvcVipNiBJAVyJSaip3zEKimeKb+iDRkgdrc58fE+6efKN7hlNBuW5O1 S+Q= X-SBRS: 2.7 X-MesageID: 11218281 X-Ironport-Server: esa4.hc3370-68.iphmx.com X-Remote-IP: 162.221.158.21 X-Policy: $RELAYED X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.69,410,1571716800"; d="scan'208";a="11218281" Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2020 16:41:04 +0100 From: Roger Pau =?iso-8859-1?Q?Monn=E9?= To: Stefan Parvu CC: Subject: Re: Xen performance on FreeBSD vs Linux Message-ID: <20200108154104.GE11738@Air-de-Roger> References: <7E9802F1-172A-41A7-A110-C69A7D8D1192@kronometrix.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7E9802F1-172A-41A7-A110-C69A7D8D1192@kronometrix.org> X-ClientProxiedBy: AMSPEX02CAS01.citrite.net (10.69.22.112) To AMSPEX02CL01.citrite.net (10.69.22.125) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 47tD4N1F0Dz3F1x X-Spamd-Bar: ------ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=citrix.com header.s=securemail header.b=TYQ8iSWH; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=citrix.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of roger.pau@citrix.com designates 216.71.155.144 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=roger.pau@citrix.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-6.46 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[citrix.com:s=securemail]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCVD_DKIM_ARC_DNSWL_MED(-0.50)[]; DWL_DNSWL_LOW(-1.00)[citrix.com.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.9.1]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[citrix.com:+]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED(-0.20)[144.155.71.216.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.3.2]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[citrix.com,none]; RCVD_COUNT_ZERO(0.00)[0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:16417, ipnet:216.71.154.0/23, country:US]; IP_SCORE(-2.26)[ip: (-6.78), ipnet: 216.71.154.0/23(-3.09), asn: 16417(-1.38), country: US(-0.05)] X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2020 15:41:25 -0000 On Mon, Jan 06, 2020 at 12:43:51PM +0200, Stefan Parvu wrote: > Hi, > > How Xen hypervisor compares in terms of performance (guest) on FreeBSD vs Linux > , using ZFS or UFS ? There are several factors to take into account here. On FreeBSD the hypervisor is built with clang, while on Linux it's usually built with gcc, and hence different optimizations will be used. Also a FreeBSD dom0 can only work in PVH mode, which is faster for certain operations like page table modifications, but it's slower for others, like issuing hypercalls, when compared to a PV dom0. I don't have figures at hand now, but guest creation is likely slower on a FreeBSD PVH dom0 than on a Linux PV dom0, and that's because hypercalls are more expensive on PVH than on PV (has nothing to do whether Linux or FreeBSD is used). > Are there any benchmarks or tests regarding this ? I don't think so, but I think they will be useful if someone has the time to perform them :). Thanks, Roger. From owner-freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Thu Jan 9 21:25:14 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D34EE1F9F18 for ; Thu, 9 Jan 2020 21:25:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vectormarketingsite.021@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qk1-x744.google.com (mail-qk1-x744.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::744]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47tzff2nPvz3Fr0 for ; Thu, 9 Jan 2020 21:25:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vectormarketingsite.021@gmail.com) Received: by mail-qk1-x744.google.com with SMTP id c16so7468124qko.6 for ; Thu, 09 Jan 2020 13:25:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:thread-index:thread-topic:to:subject:date:message-id :mime-version:content-class:importance:priority; bh=tdBr6hWV4bBLpkYI/3jiZmpi7tPWUDdYRq9SqK4/QeU=; b=aF29LNK4owDZWmjBhSbPNG0OnbcAdU9L8BjgCnrd8qtXF2r6CzQ2ieF7gPNXn7zi4S 2DioGv9KFKDVMm7QOAVqWJb7Vc8+tXoVu91VG5i5reETTzqvUWhVil66USOgZNdSnFaF Hth1aACIyZpTd+FLnQgZ7Mf5ItZWTWRRsT3sSSjFXLc/zWF6Rqhu3mNNLhnDBhGZEfox AaByFzANS8aDiZx4LLINEv99VTA+6KYN+FCVh0zSkiGDN0D/mKE53Ds1nbdfJdt/9qqQ EHLv04T+z4jy6EyOqYVSLVkuVTNAu22BHFsQXMwrU6urh5EbE4uRu8ELi8lk5RzE12Gw mdYQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:thread-index:thread-topic:to:subject:date :message-id:mime-version:content-class:importance:priority; bh=tdBr6hWV4bBLpkYI/3jiZmpi7tPWUDdYRq9SqK4/QeU=; b=cNy7yT6kPSNTPnPH5lhwO+p36NZi2Q+1qYvo3V8GhghiS6tQQwaUXYRnY1w7Brx0YT sbcMu3xJUWme5LJI6mnzDHOEq/F9JLFwJcvkNi7vpooLS34ZFED8qjGLNbpmk4Ken2r8 HszHoAQYLPZkYU42Guxyic28lWTX1OyxnCfjR0X4/4x11bkCxYxVmHN9lpv2OFtmPbRw +FcaKknh6Oc8YkqqmAU8zUpOUxDfgU1XpHOr6f69hTpsiK0BsfNGflbmDKsg43i+VHO2 y0ExM48dq12A9gIf8PH9Cw/urlIva00vjAB/vai3PPeI/YAI6PL4s2ImAO9ENvWOa0T7 CbxA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVN6zuIxOeemocJuZDCIlrqrLHA+Dhcc2XBsQBWSn/XnG/4pvPU lbfeaGNmzHFt/Uzq0OsVw2Ub7riZ3TA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyu7WfT7ruM7ghUcQDjKqVCfiaJW34aCF22tiRPmWBg1udQi4cqhITWAMY0CbXJmLLb53lomA== X-Received: by 2002:a37:a70b:: with SMTP id q11mr11412263qke.393.1578605113293; Thu, 09 Jan 2020 13:25:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from ThingTwo ([2604:2000:6b83:2e00:15af:b1f2:b1fc:1022]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g18sm3618166qki.13.2020.01.09.13.25.11 for (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 09 Jan 2020 13:25:12 -0800 (PST) From: John Stone X-Google-Original-From: "John Stone" thread-index: AdXHM0CJRw5zRoxYTyml8vclVNQCxw== Thread-Topic: Thank You for your time. To: Subject: Thank You for your time. Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2020 16:25:01 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft CDO for Windows 2000 Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message Importance: Normal Priority: normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.1.7601.24158 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 47tzff2nPvz3Fr0 X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=aF29LNK4; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of vectormarketingsite021@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::744 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=vectormarketingsite021@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.67 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36:c]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; URI_COUNT_ODD(1.00)[15]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.97)[-0.973,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; HTML_SHORT_LINK_IMG_1(2.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-xen@freebsd.org]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.86)[-0.855,0]; IP_SCORE_FREEMAIL(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; IP_SCORE(0.00)[ip: (2.13), ipnet: 2607:f8b0::/32(-2.12), asn: 15169(-1.85), country: US(-0.05)]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[4.4.7.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.0.0.4.6.8.4.0.b.8.f.7.0.6.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2020 21:25:14 -0000 Thank You for taking time out of your schedule. Here is 20% off our entire line until September 3rd, 2019 Use the discount code "MADMANGO" at checkout Use casn even use this link 20% Dicsount Link Elegant Yet Rugged Armored Case for iPhone and Samsung THIS SUPER STRONG HYBRID COMPOSITE MAKES THIS CASE A SHOCKPROOF ARMOR CASE FOR HEAVY DUTY PROTECTION LED Luminous Flowing USB Charging Cable Super Strong! Super Cool! What good is super cool if it only lasts 5 days. This super tough cord can last beyond what you can dish out. Never lose your charging cable in the dark. Flowing LED lights pulsates from the power source to the device. Stand out in crowd and unique enough not to confuse your cord with another person's plain cord. This is a really nice gift for a friend. Click for 17% Discount on All Our Inventory Broadway29.com If you want to be removed from this list, please Click Here . From owner-freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Fri Jan 10 09:31:23 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 759671E1B49 for ; Fri, 10 Jan 2020 09:31:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sparvu@kronometrix.org) Received: from mail.kronometrix.org (mail.kronometrix.org [95.85.46.90]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mail.kronometrix.org", Issuer "mail.kronometrix.org" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47vHmV3zxYz4PKF for ; Fri, 10 Jan 2020 09:31:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sparvu@kronometrix.org) Received: from [192.168.1.172] (82-203-141-23.bb.dnainternet.fi [82.203.141.23]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.kronometrix.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id 00A9VEVY047223 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 10 Jan 2020 09:31:15 GMT (envelope-from sparvu@kronometrix.org) X-Authentication-Warning: mail.kronometrix.org: Host 82-203-141-23.bb.dnainternet.fi [82.203.141.23] claimed to be [192.168.1.172] From: Stefan Parvu Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.0 \(3608.40.2.2.4\)) Subject: bridge0 settings for VMs Message-Id: <6470B729-33DA-430B-9286-A645EEE4BE2D@kronometrix.org> Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2020 11:31:09 +0200 To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.40.2.2.4) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 47vHmV3zxYz4PKF X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of sparvu@kronometrix.org designates 95.85.46.90 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=sparvu@kronometrix.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.07 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.55)[-0.545,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-xen@freebsd.org]; HAS_XAW(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.18)[-0.184,0]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[kronometrix.org]; IP_SCORE(0.60)[ip: (0.37), ipnet: 95.85.0.0/18(1.00), asn: 14061(1.67), country: US(-0.05)]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; ASN(0.00)[asn:14061, ipnet:95.85.0.0/18, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2020 09:31:23 -0000 Hi, Under the documentation [1] there are pointers about how one would = define an interface for all domUs. Now the documentation says: # sysrc cloned_interfaces=3D"bridge0" # sysrc ifconfig_bridge0=3D"addm em0 SYNCDHCP" # sysrc ifconfig_em0=3D=E2=80=9Cup=E2=80=9D where em0 is the main interface. Now I have server which has a functional em1 interface running and = configured. I want to define a bridge0 interface for all domains, but = not to use DHCP, because I dont have a DHCP server on that network.=20 Any ideas how shall I configure the bridge0 interface using = ifconfig_bridge0=3D=E2=80=9C..." Thanks, Stefan Parvu sparvu@kronometrix.org From owner-freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Fri Jan 10 10:58:36 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9ABDD1E38BD for ; Fri, 10 Jan 2020 10:58:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from SRS0=+A+2=27=quip.cz=000.fbsd@elsa.codelab.cz) Received: from elsa.codelab.cz (elsa.codelab.cz [94.124.105.4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47vKj73sMQz4T5W for ; Fri, 10 Jan 2020 10:58:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from SRS0=+A+2=27=quip.cz=000.fbsd@elsa.codelab.cz) Received: from elsa.codelab.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by elsa.codelab.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 609CB28417; Fri, 10 Jan 2020 11:58:32 +0100 (CET) Received: from illbsd.quip.test (ip-62-24-92-232.net.upcbroadband.cz [62.24.92.232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by elsa.codelab.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8449F28416; Fri, 10 Jan 2020 11:58:30 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: bridge0 settings for VMs To: Stefan Parvu , freebsd-xen@freebsd.org References: <6470B729-33DA-430B-9286-A645EEE4BE2D@kronometrix.org> From: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> Message-ID: <0d0c17b1-4da1-ba98-fe7c-09184166fe15@quip.cz> Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2020 11:58:31 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/52.0 SeaMonkey/2.49.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <6470B729-33DA-430B-9286-A645EEE4BE2D@kronometrix.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 47vKj73sMQz4T5W X-Spamd-Bar: +++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of SRS0=@elsa.codelab.cz has no SPF policy when checking 94.124.105.4) smtp.mailfrom=SRS0=@elsa.codelab.cz X-Spamd-Result: default: False [4.00 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(0.87)[ip: (0.36), ipnet: 94.124.104.0/21(0.18), asn: 42000(3.71), country: CZ(0.09)]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[quip.cz]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.93)[0.931,0]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[4.105.124.94.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.10.0]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(1.00)[0.998,0]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[000.fbsd@quip.cz,SRS0=@elsa.codelab.cz]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:42000, ipnet:94.124.104.0/21, country:CZ]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[A,2=27=quip.cz=000.fbsd]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[000.fbsd@quip.cz,SRS0=@elsa.codelab.cz] X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2020 10:58:36 -0000 Stefan Parvu wrote on 2020/01/10 10:31: > Hi, > > Under the documentation [1] there are pointers about how one would define an interface for all domUs. > Now the documentation says: > > # sysrc cloned_interfaces="bridge0" > # sysrc ifconfig_bridge0="addm em0 SYNCDHCP" > # sysrc ifconfig_em0=“up” > > where em0 is the main interface. > > Now I have server which has a functional em1 interface running and configured. I want to define a bridge0 interface for all domains, but not to use DHCP, because I dont have a DHCP server on that network. > > Any ideas how shall I configure the bridge0 interface using ifconfig_bridge0=“..." Just remove SYNCDHCP For example: cloned_interfaces="bridge0 tap0" ifconfig_bridge0="addm bge0 up addm tap0 up" It will create bridge0 with bge0 and tap0 as a members. bridge0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 ether 02:71:2c:00:ca:00 nd6 options=9 groups: bridge id 00:00:00:00:00:00 priority 32768 hellotime 2 fwddelay 15 maxage 20 holdcnt 6 proto rstp maxaddr 2000 timeout 1200 root id 00:00:00:00:00:00 priority 32768 ifcost 0 port 0 member: tap0 flags=143 ifmaxaddr 0 port 5 priority 128 path cost 2000000 member: bge0 flags=143 ifmaxaddr 0 port 1 priority 128 path cost 55 Kind regards Miroslav Lachman From owner-freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Sat Jan 11 22:13:28 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BED61F6362 for ; Sat, 11 Jan 2020 22:13:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sparvu@kronometrix.org) Received: from mail.kronometrix.org (mail.kronometrix.org [95.85.46.90]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mail.kronometrix.org", Issuer "mail.kronometrix.org" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47wDdL69PBz4XtW for ; Sat, 11 Jan 2020 22:13:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sparvu@kronometrix.org) Received: from [192.168.1.172] (82-203-141-23.bb.dnainternet.fi [82.203.141.23]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.kronometrix.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id 00BMDHR6062473 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 11 Jan 2020 22:13:18 GMT (envelope-from sparvu@kronometrix.org) X-Authentication-Warning: mail.kronometrix.org: Host 82-203-141-23.bb.dnainternet.fi [82.203.141.23] claimed to be [192.168.1.172] From: Stefan Parvu Message-Id: <876E35A8-90DA-4CED-A9AF-43BA331A5D7A@kronometrix.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.0 \(3608.40.2.2.4\)) Subject: Re: bridge0 settings for VMs Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2020 00:13:12 +0200 In-Reply-To: <0d0c17b1-4da1-ba98-fe7c-09184166fe15@quip.cz> Cc: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org To: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> References: <6470B729-33DA-430B-9286-A645EEE4BE2D@kronometrix.org> <0d0c17b1-4da1-ba98-fe7c-09184166fe15@quip.cz> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.40.2.2.4) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 47wDdL69PBz4XtW X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of sparvu@kronometrix.org designates 95.85.46.90 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=sparvu@kronometrix.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.56 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.62)[-0.617,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; HAS_XAW(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[kronometrix.org]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.74)[-0.739,0]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; IP_SCORE(0.59)[ip: (0.37), ipnet: 95.85.0.0/18(0.99), asn: 14061(1.66), country: US(-0.05)]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; ASN(0.00)[asn:14061, ipnet:95.85.0.0/18, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2020 22:13:28 -0000 > Just remove SYNCDHCP Cheers. That was working fine. Stefan