From owner-ctm-users@freebsd.org Thu Apr 1 09:40:40 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ctm-users@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EDD55C6075 for ; Thu, 1 Apr 2021 09:40:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Andre.Albsmeier@siemens.com) Received: from david.siemens.de (david.siemens.de [192.35.17.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "david.siemens.de", Issuer "QuoVadis Global SSL ICA G3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F9ypt1Cxfz3HRf for ; Thu, 1 Apr 2021 09:40:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Andre.Albsmeier@siemens.com) Received: from mail2.siemens.de (mail2.siemens.de [139.25.208.11]) by david.siemens.de (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 1319eZcQ015662 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Thu, 1 Apr 2021 11:40:36 +0200 Received: from curry.mchp.siemens.de (curry.mchp.siemens.de [10.10.85.13]) by mail2.siemens.de (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 1319eZsO018756 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Thu, 1 Apr 2021 11:40:35 +0200 Received: (from user@localhost) by curry.mchp.siemens.de (8.16.1/8.16.1) id 1319eZhh012280 Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2021 11:40:35 +0200 From: Andre Albsmeier To: ctm-users@freebsd.org Cc: Andre.Albsmeier@siemens.com Subject: Fwd: Re: No ports-cur ctm files going out via email? Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline document_confidentiality: Restricted X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4F9ypt1Cxfz3HRf X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=siemens.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of Andre.Albsmeier@siemens.com designates 192.35.17.14 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=Andre.Albsmeier@siemens.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.80 / 15.00]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_GOOD(0.00)[192.35.17.14:from]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+exists:192.35.17.14.spf.siemens.com]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[ctm-users@freebsd.org]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(1.00)[1.000]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[siemens.com,none]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15465, ipnet:192.35.16.0/22, country:DE]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[ctm-users]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI(-0.50)[192.35.17.14:from] X-BeenThere: ctm-users@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: CTM User discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2021 09:40:40 -0000 Me, bothering again: I was missing -rw-r--r-- 1 2033 16 174038 Mar 30 06:30 ports-cur.13925.gz -rw-r--r-- 1 2033 16 30150 Mar 30 22:30 ports-cur.13926.gz while -rw-r--r-- 1 2033 16 41716 Mar 29 14:31 ports-cur.13924.gz -rw-r--r-- 1 2033 16 4148 Mar 31 14:34 ports-cur.13927.gz were received succesfully from ctm-ports-cur@mailman.berklix.org. Regarding src-11 and src-12 I never have problems. Anybody else? -Andre ----- Forwarded message from "[ext] Andre Albsmeier" ----- Return-Path: From: "[ext] Andre Albsmeier" Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 06:32:17 +0100 To: Stephen Montgomery-Smith CC: ctm-users@freebsd.org Subject: Re: No ports-cur ctm files going out via email? X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.107 tagged_above=-999 required=8 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, CTASD_SPAM_UNKNOWN=-1, EXPURGATE_CLEAN=-0.001, EXT_TAG_FROM=0.001, MTPOLICYD_GOOD=-0.001, MTPOLICYD_REPORT_SPF_PASS=0.001, RDNS_NONE=0.793] autolearn=no On Fri, 05-Mar-2021 at 11:18:45 -0600, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: > On 3/5/21 12:00 AM, Andre Albsmeier wrote: > > > Hmm, seems at least me doesn't get ctm-ports-cur-fast since ports-cur.13871.gz > > while we are at ports-cur.13879.gz on berklix. > > The way it is currently set up, they all go to > ctm-ports-cur@mailman.berklix.org. > > I changed it to send it to ctm-ports-cur-fast as well. Let me know > whether or not it has started to work again. I had disabled mail delivery on ctm-ports-cur (w/o -fast) while leaving it on for -fast to see what happens. I haven't seen any mail coming in since then so apparently it didn't work. But for me I am happy with ctm-ports-cur -- knowing that -fast doesn't work. I don't known if distinguishing between -fast and non-fast is still needed at all... -Andre From owner-ctm-users@freebsd.org Thu Apr 1 21:20:58 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ctm-users@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 237785B70F4 for ; Thu, 1 Apr 2021 21:20:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from slim.berklix.org (slim.berklix.org [94.185.90.68]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "slim.berklix.org", Issuer "slim.berklix.org" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FBGLx1ZGFz4r6c for ; Thu, 1 Apr 2021 21:20:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from mart.js.berklix.net (p4fe6d3cc.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [79.230.211.204]) (authenticated bits=128) by slim.berklix.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id 131LKi2h009950 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 1 Apr 2021 23:20:54 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (fire.js.berklix.net [192.168.91.41]) by mart.js.berklix.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id 131LKhYt050944; Thu, 1 Apr 2021 23:20:43 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fire.js.berklix.net (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 131LKS9W085793; Thu, 1 Apr 2021 23:20:38 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Message-Id: <202104012120.131LKS9W085793@fire.js.berklix.net> To: Andre Albsmeier cc: ctm-users@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: No ports-cur ctm files going out via email? From: "Julian H. Stacey" Organization: http://berklix.com/jhs/ User-agent: EXMH on FreeBSD http://berklix.com/free/ X-From: http://www.berklix.org/~jhs/ In-reply-to: Your message "Thu, 01 Apr 2021 11:40:35 +0200." Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2021 23:20:28 +0200 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FBGLx1ZGFz4r6c X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of jhs@berklix.com has no SPF policy when checking 94.185.90.68) smtp.mailfrom=jhs@berklix.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.10 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; HAS_ORG_HEADER(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[79.230.211.204:received]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[94.185.90.68:from]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:33824, ipnet:94.185.88.0/22, country:DE]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FREEFALL_USER(0.00)[jhs]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[berklix.com]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[94.185.90.68:from:127.0.2.255]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[ctm-users] X-BeenThere: ctm-users@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: CTM User discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2021 21:20:58 -0000 Andre Albsmeier wrote: > Me, bothering again: > > I was missing > > -rw-r--r-- 1 2033 16 174038 Mar 30 06:30 ports-cur.13925.gz > -rw-r--r-- 1 2033 16 30150 Mar 30 22:30 ports-cur.13926.gz > > while > > -rw-r--r-- 1 2033 16 41716 Mar 29 14:31 ports-cur.13924.gz > -rw-r--r-- 1 2033 16 4148 Mar 31 14:34 ports-cur.13927.gz > > were received succesfully from ctm-ports-cur@mailman.berklix.org. > Regarding src-11 and src-12 I never have problems. > > Anybody else? Server ctm.berklix.org has printenv TZ Europe/Berlin ls -l /pub/FreeBSD/development/CTM/ports-cur/ -rw-r--r-- 1 sms ctm 41716 Mar 29 16:31 ports-cur.13924.gz -rw-r--r-- 1 sms ctm 174038 Mar 30 08:30 ports-cur.13925.gz -rw-r--r-- 1 sms ctm 30150 Mar 31 00:30 ports-cur.13926.gz -rw-r--r-- 1 sms ctm 4148 Mar 31 16:34 ports-cur.13927.gz & date shows in sync with radio wall clock I received all these by email (on my client host) printenv TZ Europe/Berlin -r--r--r-- 1 mailnull mailnull 41716 Mar 29 16:36 ports-cur.13924.gz -r--r--r-- 1 mailnull mailnull 174038 Mar 30 09:06 ports-cur.13925.gz -r--r--r-- 1 mailnull mailnull 30150 Mar 31 00:36 ports-cur.13926.gz -r--r--r-- 1 mailnull mailnull 4148 Mar 31 16:36 ports-cur.13927.gz & ctm applied automaticaly up to 13927 on my /pub/FreeBSD/branches/-current/ports with 9.2-RELEASE with /usr/sbin/ctm Cheers, -- Julian Stacey http://berklix.com/jhs/ http://berklix.org/petitions/ UK stole 750K votes from EU Brits pre Brexit ref for GDP-4pc. Dump BoJo & Mogg. From owner-ctm-users@freebsd.org Fri Apr 2 04:38:14 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ctm-users@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C975B5C1217 for ; Fri, 2 Apr 2021 04:38:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Andre.Albsmeier@siemens.com) Received: from david.siemens.de (david.siemens.de [192.35.17.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "david.siemens.de", Issuer "QuoVadis Global SSL ICA G3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FBS3V3Yrhz3mjM for ; Fri, 2 Apr 2021 04:38:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Andre.Albsmeier@siemens.com) Received: from mail1.siemens.de (mail1.siemens.de [139.23.33.14]) by david.siemens.de (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 1324cB0K005400 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 2 Apr 2021 06:38:11 +0200 Received: from curry.mchp.siemens.de (curry.mchp.siemens.de [10.10.85.13]) by mail1.siemens.de (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 1324cBl5029800 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 2 Apr 2021 06:38:11 +0200 Received: (from user@localhost) by curry.mchp.siemens.de (8.16.1/8.16.1) id 1324cBdn014262 Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2021 06:38:11 +0200 From: Andre Albsmeier To: "Julian H. Stacey" Cc: Andre Albsmeier , ctm-users@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: No ports-cur ctm files going out via email? Message-ID: References: <202104012120.131LKS9W085793@fire.js.berklix.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <202104012120.131LKS9W085793@fire.js.berklix.net> document_confidentiality: Restricted X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FBS3V3Yrhz3mjM X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-BeenThere: ctm-users@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: CTM User discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Apr 2021 04:38:14 -0000 On Thu, 01-Apr-2021 at 23:20:28 +0200, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > Andre Albsmeier wrote: > > Me, bothering again: > > > > I was missing > > > > -rw-r--r-- 1 2033 16 174038 Mar 30 06:30 ports-cur.13925.gz > > -rw-r--r-- 1 2033 16 30150 Mar 30 22:30 ports-cur.13926.gz > > > > while > > > > -rw-r--r-- 1 2033 16 41716 Mar 29 14:31 ports-cur.13924.gz > > -rw-r--r-- 1 2033 16 4148 Mar 31 14:34 ports-cur.13927.gz > > > > were received succesfully from ctm-ports-cur@mailman.berklix.org. > > Regarding src-11 and src-12 I never have problems. > > > > Anybody else? > > Server ctm.berklix.org has Yes, the output of the files above came from ftp.berklix.org. Otherwise I wouldn't have known that 13925 and 13926 already exist. When 13927 came in properly and couldn't be applied I checked there and found them. > printenv TZ > Europe/Berlin > ls -l /pub/FreeBSD/development/CTM/ports-cur/ > -rw-r--r-- 1 sms ctm 41716 Mar 29 16:31 ports-cur.13924.gz > -rw-r--r-- 1 sms ctm 174038 Mar 30 08:30 ports-cur.13925.gz > -rw-r--r-- 1 sms ctm 30150 Mar 31 00:30 ports-cur.13926.gz > -rw-r--r-- 1 sms ctm 4148 Mar 31 16:34 ports-cur.13927.gz > & date shows in sync with radio wall clock > > I received all these by email (on my client host) The only explanation is that my company's mailserver was filtering them. However, I don't know what triggers this as others (and src-11 and src-12) never are missing but for ports-cur this was not the first time. I will subscribe to ports-cur from another address (which I have fully under my control) and we'll see what will happen. -Andre -- Linux is for people who hate Windows. BSD is for people that love UNIX. From owner-ctm-users@freebsd.org Fri Apr 2 11:36:49 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ctm-users@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10BAB5CC0F6 for ; Fri, 2 Apr 2021 11:36:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from slim.berklix.org (slim.berklix.org [94.185.90.68]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "slim.berklix.org", Issuer "slim.berklix.org" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FBdLR35F3z4lSY for ; Fri, 2 Apr 2021 11:36:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from mart.js.berklix.net (p4fe6d3cc.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [79.230.211.204]) (authenticated bits=128) by slim.berklix.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id 132BaeuK017167 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 2 Apr 2021 13:36:44 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (fire.js.berklix.net [192.168.91.41]) by mart.js.berklix.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id 132Bad79055375; Fri, 2 Apr 2021 13:36:40 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fire.js.berklix.net (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 132BaOGT094492; Fri, 2 Apr 2021 13:36:34 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Message-Id: <202104021136.132BaOGT094492@fire.js.berklix.net> To: Andre Albsmeier cc: ctm-users@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: No ports-cur ctm files going out via email? From: "Julian H. Stacey" Organization: http://berklix.com/jhs/ User-agent: EXMH on FreeBSD http://berklix.com/free/ X-From: http://www.berklix.org/~jhs/ In-reply-to: Your message "Fri, 02 Apr 2021 06:38:11 +0200." Date: Fri, 02 Apr 2021 13:36:24 +0200 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FBdLR35F3z4lSY X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of jhs@berklix.com has no SPF policy when checking 94.185.90.68) smtp.mailfrom=jhs@berklix.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.10 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; HAS_ORG_HEADER(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[79.230.211.204:received]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[94.185.90.68:from]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:33824, ipnet:94.185.88.0/22, country:DE]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FREEFALL_USER(0.00)[jhs]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[berklix.com]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[94.185.90.68:from:127.0.2.255]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[ctm-users] X-BeenThere: ctm-users@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: CTM User discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Apr 2021 11:36:49 -0000 Hi, Reference: > From: Andre Albsmeier > Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2021 06:38:11 +0200 Andre Albsmeier wrote: > On Thu, 01-Apr-2021 at 23:20:28 +0200, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > > Andre Albsmeier wrote: > > > Me, bothering again: > > > > > > I was missing > > > > > > -rw-r--r-- 1 2033 16 174038 Mar 30 06:30 ports-cur.13925.gz > > > -rw-r--r-- 1 2033 16 30150 Mar 30 22:30 ports-cur.13926.gz > > > > > > while > > > > > > -rw-r--r-- 1 2033 16 41716 Mar 29 14:31 ports-cur.13924.gz > > > -rw-r--r-- 1 2033 16 4148 Mar 31 14:34 ports-cur.13927.gz > > > > > > were received succesfully from ctm-ports-cur@mailman.berklix.org. > > > Regarding src-11 and src-12 I never have problems. > > > > > > Anybody else? > > > > Server ctm.berklix.org has > > Yes, the output of the files above came from ftp.berklix.org. Otherwise > I wouldn't have known that 13925 and 13926 already exist. When 13927 > came in properly and couldn't be applied I checked there and found them. > > > printenv TZ > > Europe/Berlin > > ls -l /pub/FreeBSD/development/CTM/ports-cur/ > > -rw-r--r-- 1 sms ctm 41716 Mar 29 16:31 ports-cur.13924.gz > > -rw-r--r-- 1 sms ctm 174038 Mar 30 08:30 ports-cur.13925.gz > > -rw-r--r-- 1 sms ctm 30150 Mar 31 00:30 ports-cur.13926.gz > > -rw-r--r-- 1 sms ctm 4148 Mar 31 16:34 ports-cur.13927.gz > > & date shows in sync with radio wall clock > > > > I received all these by email (on my client host) > > The only explanation is that my company's mailserver was filtering them. Maybe some blocks of data matched a spam detector > However, I don't know what triggers this as others (and src-11 and src-12) > never are missing but for ports-cur this was not the first time. I did an OS upgrade a while back, affecting all lists, but I'm not aware of any disruption now. > I will subscribe to ports-cur from another address (which I have fully > under my control) and we'll see what will happen. Good idea. ports-cur-fast & ports-cur available via berklix.org ports-cur available via freebsd.org same ports-cur data is sent to both lists If you want to test if your company is maybe filtering on sender domain, you could sub. a test address to both sender domains, & compare. Cheers, -- Julian Stacey http://berklix.com/jhs/ http://stolenvotes.uk UK for Brexit stole 750K votes from Brits in EU & 3.7M globaly. Zap BoJo Mogg.