From nobody Mon May 24 14:25:00 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-current@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74F759E0238 for ; Mon, 24 May 2021 14:25:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from SRS0=se1L3t=KT=codenetworks.net=sm@eigbox.net) Received: from bosmailout06.eigbox.net (bosmailout06.eigbox.net [66.96.187.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Fpfcl2BSkz4SNd for ; Mon, 24 May 2021 14:25:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from SRS0=se1L3t=KT=codenetworks.net=sm@eigbox.net) Received: from bosmailscan04.eigbox.net ([10.20.15.4]) by bosmailout06.eigbox.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1llBW2-00073I-9m for freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Mon, 24 May 2021 10:25:10 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=codenetworks.net; s=dkim; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type: In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:References:Cc:To:Subject: Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender :Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=LDGOXeyWbMfEpRSkpICmTrgyRbKTREn4Khr04OrKQSo=; b=jZGPh/rFbcDvveoRcIXSPAV3Au b+OIaN54NlybNGQpk2CnT+DAmMF/iUvlHL6DnBPzHJ4rhMjo8DsCrQXA/xTNsY/SdOluf4eT0Vpuj BqqBSX6iTadzH5HhwE1A9M6M2CkIzNe8RHT+Gju6BlaGgX4bFF/RquELRnWGsZIgRA9f6gbyTlrbG fgiFHzibH4dYyIpCElbJwxr3NQS23cxq5ntH6VwSKyl091ab3h32cKBWreDJ9h2Mmv1sOiZdnaJmd 0dZKVl+HLx2dgugLy6DdyV65qXehQc+Ae0I11QhYocHZKTuC80wsPdW+vmaQrzU3L9AI3dIY1B0y8 FeG4yXNg==; Received: from [10.115.3.32] (helo=bosimpout12) by bosmailscan04.eigbox.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1llBW2-0004vk-1N for freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Mon, 24 May 2021 10:25:10 -0400 Received: from bosauthsmtp10.yourhostingaccount.com ([10.20.18.10]) by bosimpout12 with id 8eR4250210D2CUy01eR7U4; Mon, 24 May 2021 10:25:10 -0400 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.3 cv=d4VuNSrE c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=Kpo39fPXdbgqDwiI3/AEUA==:117 a=S0tVm33GliTDcMc34U0lVw==:17 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=5FLXtPjwQuUA:10 a=xmzWzR3YuM0A:10 a=Oes-RfHLPjksS72h6FMA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 Received: from [5.159.146.31] (port=31994 helo=[192.168.1.100]) by bosauthsmtp10.eigbox.net with esmtpa (Exim) id 1llBVw-0000CS-80; Mon, 24 May 2021 10:25:04 -0400 Subject: Re: FreeBSD - rc.conf man page splitting. To: Steve Kargl Cc: freebsd-current References: <20210523202622.GA26188@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> From: Santiago Martinez Message-ID: Date: Mon, 24 May 2021 15:25:00 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.2 List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-current List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210523202622.GA26188@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US X-EN-UserInfo: d3bdfab0736480cedf04ed92aaea2ef5:931c98230c6409dcc37fa7e93b490c27 X-EN-AuthUser: sm@codenetworks.net X-EN-OrigIP: 5.159.146.31 X-EN-OrigHost: unknown X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Fpfcl2BSkz4SNd X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[] Ok, noted. my proposal come after looking for network parameters (which also is a topic to talk about) the list is so huge that it doesn't not make it simple.  But if this work for most, then i have to accommodate to that! Thanks for your feedback! Santi On 5/23/21 9:26 PM, Steve Kargl wrote: > On Sun, May 23, 2021 at 09:20:45PM +0100, Santiago Martinez wrote: >> Just wondering whats your view on splitting rc.conf man pages (per >> section/topic), something similar to what it was done with zfs. >> >> For example rc.conf-fw, rc.conf-network and so on. And yes if people think >> is a good idea im happy to take the task. >> > IMO, Bad idea (tm). > From nobody Mon May 24 14:40:09 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-current@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4E589EB0C8 for ; Mon, 24 May 2021 14:40:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from asomers@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ot1-f52.google.com (mail-ot1-f52.google.com [209.85.210.52]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FpfyF63nqz4b0c for ; Mon, 24 May 2021 14:40:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from asomers@gmail.com) Received: by mail-ot1-f52.google.com with SMTP id r26-20020a056830121ab02902a5ff1c9b81so25400610otp.11 for ; Mon, 24 May 2021 07:40:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=vFUXwQ3UXbyQqw+9VyAeyXBum3VSWVcU4E3Mri6rM4w=; b=UsCylKEwfIzgmat1kztSwwam1yFth4KnlVTf24SF+he0ma1k8p7he09DjpGk06fqSD s1/H73hQBrsKU7E3HKhSFKmg7RAGRxgNAXDvpv0nRA89VlqruxqR0RQtmhjsnyNvsRi1 BpSVa/N9z+XIW6/hMwgOa3K1Z13u72JEFmtrqEZ5Y4RJV0TpB5mecQjoEyrW9tQgK5DN s4m+gxkj01+dimka/rIohkYAZWheoA3t1MEhq6cDjFYBJC7J2wS01FlgEVkVy62Rfb3n PfR70oFSj31JSCIyw3H6DB4ji48typtsx731Uxlt9C+cCOtHBICntCWCGKXqeVdZW9+/ fWZQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532c5CCrvNonb0eio9az8rdAqTwdsNq3SKkj63BNYLCtkRIKAW+X qxGvUg0zEmnvQGPmZacb0GfroR6qomQuS+YTBAA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw8xnDxT5AuayXFK25y2v4rageo7IUob/HI/XIzDZO3F+58cw9lL1o8r3DlCNN/GIAEdnbXtq5cAvNUN+t2QD4= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:349b:: with SMTP id c27mr19897502otu.251.1621867220666; Mon, 24 May 2021 07:40:20 -0700 (PDT) List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-current List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210523202622.GA26188@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> In-Reply-To: From: Alan Somers Date: Mon, 24 May 2021 08:40:09 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: FreeBSD - rc.conf man page splitting. To: Santiago Martinez Cc: Steve Kargl , freebsd-current Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000008f8c3d05c3146344" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FpfyF63nqz4b0c X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[] --0000000000008f8c3d05c3146344 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" That man page is getting pretty big. However, it's not always obvious which section a particular setting should be in. Right now, you can always just search through the entire thing. But searching would be harder if it were split up. So I vote to keep it together. -Alan On Mon, May 24, 2021 at 8:28 AM Santiago Martinez wrote: > Ok, noted. my proposal come after looking for network parameters (which > also is a topic to talk about) the list is so huge that it doesn't not > make it simple. But if this work for most, then i have to accommodate > to that! > > Thanks for your feedback! > > Santi > > > > On 5/23/21 9:26 PM, Steve Kargl wrote: > > On Sun, May 23, 2021 at 09:20:45PM +0100, Santiago Martinez wrote: > >> Just wondering whats your view on splitting rc.conf man pages (per > >> section/topic), something similar to what it was done with zfs. > >> > >> For example rc.conf-fw, rc.conf-network and so on. And yes if people > think > >> is a good idea im happy to take the task. > >> > > IMO, Bad idea (tm). > > > > --0000000000008f8c3d05c3146344 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
That man page is getting pretty big.=C2=A0 However, i= t's not always obvious which section a particular setting should be in.= =C2=A0 Right now, you can always just search through the entire thing.=C2= =A0 But searching would be harder if it were split up.=C2=A0 So I vote to k= eep it together.
-Alan

On Mon, May 24, 2021 at 8:28 AM Santiag= o Martinez <sm@codenetworks.net> wrote:
Ok= , noted. my proposal come after looking for network parameters (which
also is a topic to talk about) the list is so huge that it doesn't not =
make it simple.=C2=A0 But if this work for most, then i have to accommodate=
to that!

Thanks for your feedback!

Santi



On 5/23/21 9:26 PM, Steve Kargl wrote:
> On Sun, May 23, 2021 at 09:20:45PM +0100, Santiago Martinez wrote:
>> Just wondering whats your view on splitting rc.conf man pages (per=
>> section/topic), something similar to what it was done with zfs. >>
>> For example rc.conf-fw, rc.conf-network and so on. And yes if peop= le think
>> is a good idea im happy to take the task.
>>
> IMO, Bad idea (tm).
>

--0000000000008f8c3d05c3146344-- From nobody Tue May 25 16:09:08 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-current@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 605D8B959A8 for ; Tue, 25 May 2021 16:09:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from messageb478613a780d@mail.f-rs.com) Received: from vps.artisan.gr.jp (vps.artisan.gr.jp [49.212.62.85]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FqJtZ201jz3QQY for ; Tue, 25 May 2021 16:09:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from messageb478613a780d@mail.f-rs.com) Received: from test4.novalocal (unknown [116.162.54.115]) by vps.artisan.gr.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF5D1196ED2 for ; Wed, 26 May 2021 01:09:11 +0900 (JST) Date: Tue, 25 May 2021 16:09:08 +0000 To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org From: Spence Subject: Very very important Message-ID: X-Mailer: PHPMailer 6.0.7 (https://github.com/PHPMailer/PHPMailer) List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-current List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="b1_CKSQxuGWtuHp8QWd3r11K11O4pcuRhKAyZuPLspbB0" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FqJtZ201jz3QQY X-Spamd-Bar: + Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of messageb478613a780d@mail.f-rs.com has no SPF policy when checking 49.212.62.85) smtp.mailfrom=messageb478613a780d@mail.f-rs.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [2.00 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[49.212.62.85:from]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-current@freebsd.org]; HAS_PHPMAILER_SIG(0.00)[]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[49.212.62.85:from:127.0.2.255]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(1.00)[1.000]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(1.00)[0.996]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[f-rs.com]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; RCVD_NO_TLS_LAST(0.10)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; ASN(0.00)[asn:9371, ipnet:49.212.0.0/16, country:JP]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-current]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[116.162.54.115:received] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: Y This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --b1_CKSQxuGWtuHp8QWd3r11K11O4pcuRhKAyZuPLspbB0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Hello! Ok, let me be straight, I know the fact you like to see [P]0RNOGRAPH[Y] movies with yours smartphone , so I recordded you when you MASTRUBATE. Your device got a vlrus and allowed me to use your front camera in background , also I copied all your contacts, emails, phone list, social media contacts in order to get a benefit. If you don`t send me 800$ value in [B]IT[C]0IN the video wlth u doing... you know what, will be sent to all your contacts. U can search on Google for P-a-x-f-u-l to get some coins and use the next address to send those. The amount(approximately): 0.021 The Address Part 1: 16HUW34tanK The Address Part 2: 6uVV3337ikHcB3DJD7bw6go So, you have to manually copy + paste Part 1 and Part 2 and you will get a string of 34 characters with no space between parts that start with "1" and end with "o" is in fact the final address which in Case Sensitive where you should send the bribery. I give you a few days! Oh, BTW, to remove my sneaky stuff from your device search for on HOW TO RESTORE FACTORY SETTINGS and your phone model and follow the steps. As well... you may want to end this habbit because is like any addication. --b1_CKSQxuGWtuHp8QWd3r11K11O4pcuRhKAyZuPLspbB0-- From nobody Tue May 25 19:59:40 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-current@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8E16BFAA82 for ; Tue, 25 May 2021 19:59:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from message7c9efb2cfb426@npbc.org) Received: from npbc.org (npbc.org [68.171.48.45]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.myhostcenter.com", Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FqQ0T06kTz4WZ0 for ; Tue, 25 May 2021 19:59:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from message7c9efb2cfb426@npbc.org) Received: (qmail 12874 invoked from network); 25 May 2021 15:59:48 -0400 Received: from unknown (HELO Demo-001) (36.133.246.41) by npbc.org with SMTP; 25 May 2021 15:59:47 -0400 Date: Tue, 25 May 2021 19:59:40 +0000 To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org From: Corby Subject: U should read this Message-ID: X-Mailer: PHPMailer 6.0.7 (https://github.com/PHPMailer/PHPMailer) List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-current List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="b1_uKOAkAtc1hxyUamMRO7tiayRR4dMa4AsHqHtIXpsnA" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FqQ0T06kTz4WZ0 X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of message7c9efb2cfb426@npbc.org designates 68.171.48.45 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=message7c9efb2cfb426@npbc.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.75 / 15.00]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.98)[-0.976]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[68.171.48.45:from]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+a]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; HAS_PHPMAILER_SIG(0.00)[]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[68.171.48.45:from:127.0.2.255]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.97)[-0.971]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[npbc.org]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; ASN(0.00)[asn:17054, ipnet:68.171.32.0/19, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-current] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: Y This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --b1_uKOAkAtc1hxyUamMRO7tiayRR4dMa4AsHqHtIXpsnA Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Hi! So, let me be direct, I know you like to see [P]0RNOGRAPH[Y] videos on your smartphone , and I reecorded you when you MASTRUBATE. Your smart-phone got a vlrus which gave me acess to use your front camera without you noticing , and I also extracted all your phone list, social media lists, email contacts just to get some benefits. So, if you don`t send me 800$ value in [B]lT[C]OIN the video wlth you doing, you know what, will be sent to all your contacts. You can use Google and search for [P]axful in order to get the coins and send them to the next address. The amount(approximately): 0.021 The Address Part 1: 16HUW34 The Address Part 2: tanK6uVV3337ikHcB3DJD7bw6go So, you have to manually copy + paste Part 1 and Part 2 in one string made of 34 characters with no space between parts that start with "1" and end with "o" is actually my address which in Case Sensitive where you must to send my bribery. You have a few days! Oh, BTW, to get rid of my sneaky background application search for how to restore to factory settings and your phone model and follow the instructions. As well, you may want to end this habbit because is like any addication. --b1_uKOAkAtc1hxyUamMRO7tiayRR4dMa4AsHqHtIXpsnA-- From nobody Tue May 25 23:52:07 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-current@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A93ACC0D9CA for ; Tue, 25 May 2021 23:52:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jakehfreebsd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-oi1-x22c.google.com (mail-oi1-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::22c]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FqW8j03rtz4ptC for ; Tue, 25 May 2021 23:52:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jakehfreebsd@gmail.com) Received: by mail-oi1-x22c.google.com with SMTP id s19so31950886oic.7 for ; Tue, 25 May 2021 16:52:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=wqteKnb8YISPCmeg4VzENHCnZyQ21KdRftaPtZdd/N8=; b=Uc54FICu+RV5072zPwlyvlLLERL2D61YHB59qrX9wdxxAlNJyrTtMeBbA3WGSncNlX aHLjmqPZh9LZZ5w1BVadHIV3wr6xI/x+4W1mCzfYEI0KZ9kkAu/ehEtNgyGkJS/XNiju QvP2NkDjYEjQkIYSBmklMMSiFRHr0OBq9K9G8r6LI+ivV9OLX0Dl+1McEa5Y4F4c7PBO JTF7Uo7Qp2gBO8HX0xQXt5iytFgPfN4ABAuhX5prf/tisLWlNAeqa/Mw719gZNSRNgdX tZf63QE+m5UBleOkdsK2oVtZWr+I5QD3jAZv2Z4MB3W7TMasL09KtBn22BixctZckPr4 +q4g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=wqteKnb8YISPCmeg4VzENHCnZyQ21KdRftaPtZdd/N8=; b=RvmasW83i+pRp4IDtxjlJvGj4Ip5qld4QXCeqoBGKF3YEUm+IU3zM2RA9FG6G76XnP XD9r8eCv9OLRLvypN8jvu19bhm2JwivTjiGhSJxQ3gkk9H9Z+f2IZ0kzP90mcwtv9ZaU vgOXSYA6Temorxj1a8VUSNifoWE4PcmEUGznCFxxaSIj5lrUqLRMewNNC18bNOlyqZN/ Pr20V5fo77GljCXp0XtpM7Wj4Gh0x/LMixyyAC9xTkO+5fsN+Ri1HAmd+WwJkpW1Z210 Yk4T6F5lC4YUtHU5LAyqGiFeGavY5NTFfp3GqHUT3ZJrwEFWpLTkqurX3UfO0r+3a/GT b65Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530T9rEfyTdyiHW62j1KRLRlnajxopCIlnaB2+m6zDJ0J7QNXufs HoLsKbWj0dXC/DItxJKIlnK6R6YDb+KBuFtQxJ2qfS/aziQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx8qOaf3UQizjgU8ikHji/QFeJ6zNNfCPHZQwOXtO3RKmiGL+gTLPJ1C9BohHPcMQriTTm7KCDETc2fu+oOyLo= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:f94:: with SMTP id o20mr101806oiw.121.1621986738798; Tue, 25 May 2021 16:52:18 -0700 (PDT) List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-current List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 From: jake h Date: Wed, 26 May 2021 09:52:07 +1000 Message-ID: Subject: Spam mail being sent via the FreeBSD mailing lists To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000006587b005c33037d5" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FqW8j03rtz4ptC X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=Uc54FICu; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of jakehfreebsd@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::22c as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=jakehfreebsd@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.50 / 15.00]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36:c]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::22c:from]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com:dkim]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.50)[-0.501]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-current@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::22c:from:127.0.2.255]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(1.00)[1.000]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::22c:from]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-current] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: Y --0000000000006587b005c33037d5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hi everyone, I have recently received several pieces of spam mail, apparently sent via this mailing list. These pieces of mail are the usual spam formula; Your phone has a virus, Ads, Fake blackmail, so on and so forth. Has anyone else noticed these spam emails, or is it just me? Thanks, Jake --0000000000006587b005c33037d5-- From nobody Wed May 26 00:02:05 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-current@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28D52C0EAB9 for ; Wed, 26 May 2021 00:02:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mantar@pacbell.net) Received: from sonic311-28.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com (sonic311-28.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com [66.163.188.209]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FqWN15k88z4rdC for ; Wed, 26 May 2021 00:02:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mantar@pacbell.net) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=pacbell.net; s=s2048; t=1621987327; bh=E9nZoRATRewsGUmDy1fVtMpPe7w+6KoXvMVJo2RAywI=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To:From:Subject:Reply-To; b=IF1JFaGzSn747blM+J8Dhh83F25X0MdT6UjdunaR16343Ec2uER+VG59zB6/ylvja59o/4dGzhylVb4NmD5excEn+4kjcXctmtNHL7UqmnpLk/x4o5WTPdLpa0gNA7t3vNueDsVjYAClHNvPONkaR+zcnLA+tY00ann6xkeB/UEWj89tNEF4H+i/nhLbJL3IGxdEZgm4quWmSfM5nn84EB3shiEKANvpmHRJaqA7/vZ0jSBHdaQQLkB8/zGnffzjUVyMQuCPO0xyC87zdkwCv0ix6ZPkEaDYsxYTa5CF4x0aF0Ob4bBQWJZxcOT5VWdPoW5oX8lMmKAFpVlIvSmTsw== X-SONIC-DKIM-SIGN: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1621987327; bh=CF/a6H632Oe+j5PdOuEpA6Q+WWFnQL46OIWg7oQ7Ly/=; h=X-Sonic-MF:Subject:From:Date:To:From:Subject; b=Pg/9gMj21cBHm80rNGfDmWR9trtNeMfPMSh8xRUaArdS0zWO6BTGPUiHcGkFENE5Zt2e9Z1XPx9utA1rUJfxo5bEY7o3P94x+7PQv6xuUEj3Z8p4gIbM+FIMCfp9j+UdtSMyK0CTtq7c4rtCzHCM+e1aSPcjY4COXbsi9cC//dudLfEIjjPPlNFObmqD6FEijDg05U//LHEMLRcsGQThS+++EmagNWhO7Gyh0NNvlPxrQuMdJN60dzNMUtZ3uA3ivLpu1XFMwQf06lEdIcTUd/+tU4sHF7uRIToUjno4Od5jyguXYDRDrNG/PvyU8RWWTFqsozL8Ne68EZEGQhmidQ== X-YMail-OSG: AxvAOQkVM1kbpnrV_QIoGoCArqaQB6rI1k2tG1Ljm9aAMwSHYrD5xnsex2aQJs3 4Qr077tiaGdPkBFzWtQu29JdAah7JScl0oef.288FAvcpF0yokM5zXrOQLbkv38SOJ1Zo0aLkaWY Jp4Je.XF1WXPzPsdu8L5uZgHrA1cgp76cS5sJ7WJylIePMSfWe9B7qgj.ZfzlcZw7OQT5myVJarp JqSE7QA2ItMsgCQtG__ToYsaLiNMVRp7PAvM4SLa64URT_Zd5koBMERzIko8nIJH1Fn6cWnWSzZw MPdmUEH5Ypgd9IPV2F_urPPavrnkNRF4NGLkfS.4BgYX58YLJZaDbx0T7VMzLNTmZDoXySZ0_jrV qLhPdj4AGMQzpEs9nePDlpeo8T2x3dhyK8RgHBOP0HzjKZOemalfdZmBiviguzEZ2O9Nrakwpsro Kma2z3Ayjic3lT.jHh1tyJMPXke89S4PU7VMPc01bnHSDVnP9pxHBzDc8wBYjvpwvuOgH.4LV58C oD_7dB2wWRS6XzHgOm4T6TZc.LHFkcQUSkRd1ELfNguA5SCPu5ij_7s5jGjuOICJnnT1KRz3qQIr Be93wBVuVaoul65LYeTxTkhqZc4.zSxjsKuvaZuIlfwze5d40tkQNyFE3GPoiFpoWpbCmri7ShEU uAtNbvXxJME4qjD2_6X1FEGv.b.DDNvE1C0n1m.wYlkvsXUiabXmG_m1nYWSFl1RDBKpe9Mao5qL u7aeWAIPRYge9q9AHhQSdVMYVOG1CDPSDhmuOx7jvh_yBgY5Wll.10TktqQp5UtTSG90tBOUvkpS a9dvlYmNRn5WUMElbWbdh0ILqcwUPCIXPIrU9xhk9zNIxOWDkljS0LN.RjKi7hfDtUPuwZonBpcW g62rck6uHGTSoQDk7.qBVnXV4B.wxCd5A87yybfMlxnmK91p418NoMxJ7GsqxvoPEzm71G27EPM1 cEojRXRhu8LSVsPF0dQ4JHSmrrp_KR0f7.mO4rq4lR6m6NLaJchBejFT.pDSx13Y920FwY2Iq5C1 _Ws5oAWmyQuCrkyH3bdGm4Z86g_cGMgbLDXXqem_a5JtNE7ZI1rNxnnsf5DSv5mhLGvheZr9xXhj YcbJVOoVAoH4Jn8PUfVImXYpFSemfwcYGZ_DWIZFyfFtcoVeqeqIRApG8Zf_kNLX58cXwv3hRANN PHEOCACwZm3GWfPLlsJKxMkHbx50ffcrtGobLGJA3x7KaHHyOGY3F4Jw8gS2kc5as6oXeGvgSOeT v.kaWMj5yMYHysesL6Y9sp.pRXKs9c0Ub8tyhE5_yWODf.AZ1E3Dh._gX2DVLeRLj5aJ0QZqWpax ykaNz0rVFj.Ybarvr2kqD4GfPj3UOhiNnh.g5DmaFX1WkipwUGZlwPM19b1c6fNAHRcmkQm3CKUt J5lE4pplfrFQEwWjqMYicJami.oPU0kUFLJJaQuOJq0iAY44lYFqas5xzRhS_UZFjpdh9wB5N26Y h3mYKXX1cGfN.OlUe9VV8JOpMvy8Kw5Qr_ElhN6ZKcsEB5JTi7J0eCX6wz_lz81r80OksITAac3d 5CN.2LLP.BN.AdVU87VoSecYPgiRdIXMqJXeNlBw2fIOn0y.AuklIy6RpmaxZKVA8uZ1uKjZX5rN ug6TrBo2ePsK2XdOBoUTL53pchTOaS9i3mjL0VwY.FRpH7OoV8YQwptx9ZyU_qP0noiIcfsgwgBu nhte6YQTI0x7GnoyMAEWBtuiIjgKIR_SENQUll9ZxPl0bxxdtpNKdHz0fEyhfLFpCqQE9PwxarlC aAHDc5c3wkfLN.BZqBtZGIwuunIoT4Cu7oyfxISKR_2unbQFLZcp7zlBf5fQCORqy.Lpu9OyVOED 05YGhgXpwE2utwxillaEDCyRYyTMr9eJforuGQIdK6IfcOIJibv7L8xILlQoq7jpzC2avAMZ.NNT Ei_h4SF8AZ9vuFhDwCUgjpjtOB3xMfXZ_39Pr.YldmcxDnFDRlzEzUSr9NnJM4FrEHPdPxK1HjGR L6z.iou3RY2.4X9wczHbVmyyMRiygxXnYCIMCgdzpsJbdBJsHeL2laPFb6Qh_oLYUEWH4TR0i_Uu 1TplQywdxzdGbBEIYAGSjMQ9SF1crhcf4HfcfyryGwng8mJvc_1oZEEDAud7XWT.hGz7vncOPKii qP_wJ.tNWLzbvYtKlAt3mACT_y.bJRKi8abj_9481NrlNMzxTRJog25rGgWo6TEfh4tLT9UHDHBD UQYLeH9nyXX3xrNzkt8ErbJuBjP0.2gyVCSUPhKWiVUWG33t_z.KQmlS.ckS9zVWU4XF6Vz8zR8y bk4_Kl69p12BOyZPfbFzDS2VZXyQ9zXc7Kef9XSNag_6vRWQMi3rvwabpWYMQwzaqimFMoTY_.zz aHkXnn3YAcqjYapz920Iq1k9Hxk4S7OwFKToryQ8MhC4GPbEuZmBfZm2RkR4KkC1UuPeQZcKQZnL PoCh6Q3KTXl330Gu_SBrVl6Hf0Ln8q8I10JKwsXcfDru3uP20ws0yRVS7uqZ88NPh3OdYUkGIxfg 1wrYQXXKInF7w0Zyl49ZTQY9Pezg5RZmG2JdyN2pJCPakUsa8ysW6U7Y- X-Sonic-MF: Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic311.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with HTTP; Wed, 26 May 2021 00:02:07 +0000 Received: by kubenode508.mail-prod1.omega.ne1.yahoo.com (VZM Hermes SMTP Server) with ESMTPA ID 96c9c7fb4eaeb66a384239d9b700b71a; Wed, 26 May 2021 00:02:06 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-current List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.21\)) Subject: Re: Spam mail being sent via the FreeBSD mailing lists From: "Manfred Antar (KN6KBS)" In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 25 May 2021 17:02:05 -0700 Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: References: To: jake h X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.21) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FqWN15k88z4rdC X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N I got one this morning Blackmail stuff - just delete it. > On May 25, 2021, at 4:52 PM, jake h wrote: > > Hi everyone, > I have recently received several pieces of spam mail, apparently sent via > this mailing list. These pieces of mail are the usual spam formula; Your > phone has a virus, Ads, Fake blackmail, so on and so forth. > Has anyone else noticed these spam emails, or is it just me? > Thanks, > Jake From nobody Wed May 26 02:13:12 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-current@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0C4EBF5D90 for ; Wed, 26 May 2021 02:13:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rollingbits@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qt1-x830.google.com (mail-qt1-x830.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::830]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FqZHJ4dyrz3JJl for ; Wed, 26 May 2021 02:13:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rollingbits@gmail.com) Received: by mail-qt1-x830.google.com with SMTP id v4so24661714qtp.1 for ; Tue, 25 May 2021 19:13:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=content-transfer-encoding:from:mime-version:subject:date:message-id :references:cc:in-reply-to:to; bh=PnvUv3Jw2vDWrO2Mj//cbNHued6Ya9bxKnAHhsiEuvk=; b=D1QJvNFz4SAXguuK507HKuqi28NB5HgHdtBb3WfMYT89Igazun/UR2oc1eR9sY6FUr DslVhSwKF4Nrtk/tVhseAkS74Mv+HEOOi33mUj9tzydA4lHx2GDhIuFtm0DfJT+YEUJC Jmt8/BCQvT3iDFNKpSEBVs2bOq6BtDVt6MaAmKn4o+tM0zIDPuXeX5AGGCt1tlzS/D8T enimupszXUrXrwBlIKThzynVZkYXdR3b0XmZBC9IAI16tiRIjEatB4ip0UYA3uppYZqQ O0ujnYA8hiBd2q3FjU4jw65+WPkjmS0pd8ibXmw8x80HGtfAoqpkdK4/k1b3KcqvM2q8 tdkg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:content-transfer-encoding:from:mime-version :subject:date:message-id:references:cc:in-reply-to:to; bh=PnvUv3Jw2vDWrO2Mj//cbNHued6Ya9bxKnAHhsiEuvk=; b=m/eKJc3ZNaKojm+PPQyQakIF9cDPzlFdaXFdh01Ni6laIUH2irpMa6wezT8eap3TKU 7eDHFjfROW9hMCZvYlHA4BcItSN1Dk/VUZBJO1zoYUGIz8tqtC8/7DI6nGaJGitEs1F5 OU+oKPWzvZOKLCr3uWQtVlCclQDHJEPciOvN/DIHeNahVj46JFMaGqQgklZA82nmOVbf LE28P2cgoM8bw4ngwf5LgIWApXMt0V4wz6d9FlomNbdUhUZDgOjHXXscSVaLS0v52xKI /nLmTONDMIHclAnByRwJ0ucBjvoG1A6ZrcUnSGPIBee07rGu9Okop2GGmC7h04em3U3D hrlw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532p1gx//TmHmtGxziCGrDdISj7mRn3H+vpxHhZnqjwrI7J3ki+R L4eN7B07CmW4QieODfqrVYPV9P5jfos= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyfl2eUhKb+ki2G66myzc1+8Q0COe2oJPivLYJim/areY7z3tqIdBQv3CmsVwGbH9VJVPEJbA== X-Received: by 2002:ac8:4459:: with SMTP id m25mr12601303qtn.344.1621995195312; Tue, 25 May 2021 19:13:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtpclient.apple (177-58-190-22.3g.claro.net.br. [177.58.190.22]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z7sm640061qtn.3.2021.05.25.19.13.14 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 25 May 2021 19:13:14 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-D1650B56-7EC1-465F-9917-9ACE9C784870 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: =?utf-8?Q?Lucas_Nali_de_Magalh=C3=A3es?= List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-current List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Subject: Re: Spam mail being sent via the FreeBSD mailing lists Date: Tue, 25 May 2021 23:13:12 -0300 Message-Id: References: Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: To: jake h X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (18F72) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FqZHJ4dyrz3JJl X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: Y --Apple-Mail-D1650B56-7EC1-465F-9917-9ACE9C784870 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > On May 25, 2021, at 8:53 PM, jake h wrote: >=20 > I have recently received several pieces of spam mail, apparently sent via > this mailing list. These pieces of mail are the usual spam formula; Your > phone has a virus, Ads, Fake blackmail, so on and so forth. > Has anyone else noticed these spam emails, or is it just me? I'm receiving these too. It looks like the servers are bouncing some of them= just for me, even. And I'm receiving not just from this list; also from fre= ebsd-hackers@ and ports@. --=20 rollingbits =E2=80=94 =F0=9F=93=A7 rollingbits@icloud.com =F0=9F=93=A7 rolli= ngbits@gmail.com =F0=9F=93=A7 rollingbits@yahoo.com =F0=9F=93=A7 rollingbits= @terra.com.br =F0=9F=93=A7 rollingbits@globo.com From nobody Wed May 26 05:34:10 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-current@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32840BFD1CF for ; Wed, 26 May 2021 05:34:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@freebsd.org) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FqflK11CZz3lTv for ; Wed, 26 May 2021 05:34:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@freebsd.org) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.94.2 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1llmBG-0009QM-L9; Wed, 26 May 2021 07:34:10 +0200 Date: Wed, 26 May 2021 07:34:10 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Lucas Nali de =?iso-8859-1?Q?Magalh=E3es?= Cc: jake h , freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Spam mail being sent via the FreeBSD mailing lists Message-ID: Reply-To: postmaster@freebsd.org References: List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-current List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FqflK11CZz3lTv X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N Hi! > > On May 25, 2021, at 8:53 PM, jake h wrote: > > I have recently received several pieces of spam mail, apparently sent via > > this mailing list. These pieces of mail are the usual spam formula; Your > > phone has a virus, Ads, Fake blackmail, so on and so forth. > > Has anyone else noticed these spam emails, or is it just me? > I'm receiving these too. It looks like the servers are bouncing some of them just for me, even. And I'm receiving not just from this list; also from freebsd-hackers@ and ports@. postmaster@ is aware of the problem, we do not yet have a clear-cut solution and we're investigating. -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 Now what ? From nobody Wed May 26 14:50:57 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-current@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF78ABF23CA for ; Wed, 26 May 2021 14:51:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from slim.berklix.org (slim.berklix.org [94.185.90.68]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "slim.berklix.org", Issuer "slim.berklix.org" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Fqv6361fXz3Lxn; Wed, 26 May 2021 14:51:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from mart.js.berklix.net (p4fc4c1f5.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [79.196.193.245]) (authenticated bits=128) by slim.berklix.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id 14QEpH2I007956 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 26 May 2021 16:51:22 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (fire.js.berklix.net [192.168.91.41]) by mart.js.berklix.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id 14QEpHpf092400; Wed, 26 May 2021 16:51:17 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fire.js.berklix.net (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 14QEov8j007524; Wed, 26 May 2021 16:51:12 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Message-Id: <202105261451.14QEov8j007524@fire.js.berklix.net> To: postmaster@FreeBSD.org cc: Lucas Nali de =?iso-8859-1?Q?Magalh=E3es?= , jake h , freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Spam mail being sent via the FreeBSD mailing lists From: "Julian H. Stacey" Organization: http://berklix.com/jhs/ User-agent: EXMH on FreeBSD http://berklix.com/free/ X-From: http://www.berklix.org/~jhs/ In-reply-to: Your message "Wed, 26 May 2021 07:34:10 +0200." Date: Wed, 26 May 2021 16:50:57 +0200 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Fqv6361fXz3Lxn X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of jhs@berklix.com has no SPF policy when checking 94.185.90.68) smtp.mailfrom=jhs@berklix.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.10 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; HAS_ORG_HEADER(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:33824, ipnet:94.185.88.0/22, country:DE]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[94.185.90.68:from]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[79.196.193.245:received]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; FREEFALL_USER(0.00)[jhs]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[berklix.com]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[94.185.90.68:from:127.0.2.255]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; FREEMAIL_CC(0.00)[gmail.com,FreeBSD.org]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-current] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-current List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Kurt Jaeger wrote: > Hi! > > > On May 25, 2021, at 8:53 PM, jake h wrote: > > > I have recently received several pieces of spam mail, apparently sent via > > > this mailing list. These pieces of mail are the usual spam formula; Your > > > phone has a virus, Ads, Fake blackmail, so on and so forth. > > > Has anyone else noticed these spam emails, or is it just me? > > I'm receiving these too. It looks like the servers are bouncing some of them just for me, even. And I'm receiving not just from this list; also from freebsd-hackers@ and ports@. > > postmaster@ is aware of the problem, we do not yet have a clear-cut > solution and we're investigating. > -- > pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 Now what ? I'm on most lists & also seen much spam lately. Changing Mailman list configs to only allowing postings from subscribed addresses could dump nearly all spam; (I'm a Mailman admin elsewhere ). But @freebsd.org has prefered open lists for near all lists. Best only for the initial fresh- after- install- questions@, IMO. Mailman can also input from a spam phrases block list, though I haven't much used that on lists I run, as subscriber only block near all. Normaly the @freebsd.org anti spam mechanisms protect both lists & non lists. List back end responses to eg isp@ & hackers@ have recently migrated from Mailman to Mlmmj, I guess that shouldn't directly affect spam protection ? but it'd be interesting to know what advantage the migration might bring @freebsd.org ? ( Though I couldn't migrate most lists I run from Mailman to Mlmmj, as many lists I run are mostly non techs, incompetent with anything beyond click & fumble. Command lines of Majordomo & Mlmmj impossible for them ) Cheers, -- Julian Stacey http://berklix.com/jhs/ http://stolenvotes.uk http://www.berklix.org/~jhs/mail/sorbs/ Unreliable spam black list extorter. From nobody Wed May 26 14:53:59 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-current@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21163BF3461 for ; Wed, 26 May 2021 14:54:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zarychtam@plan-b.pwste.edu.pl) Received: from plan-b.pwste.edu.pl (plan-b.pwste.edu.pl [IPv6:2001:678:618::40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "plan-b.pwste.edu.pl", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Fqv9J3H9Hz3NDp for ; Wed, 26 May 2021 14:54:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zarychtam@plan-b.pwste.edu.pl) Received: from fomalhaut.potoki.eu ([IPv6:2001:470:71:d47:d8f1:6650:1109:cd1e]) (authenticated bits=0) by plan-b.pwste.edu.pl (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPSA id 14QEs1nO056230 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 26 May 2021 16:54:01 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from zarychtam@plan-b.pwste.edu.pl) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=plan-b.pwste.edu.pl; s=plan-b-mailer; t=1622040841; bh=KvDKPw5dalLfjeGgnIBug90g7j8ebsZJT1p/y6D+QRQ=; h=To:From:Subject:Date; b=oahDxQWbHySR4/9m7aoa/z/3bFANBk3cHQj2MiEBvBZJxgXpI5GLPIShpl/u1EcpQ vpTKYf8IfLGBJblLC4TvFELprKGYo+rG25BtRWkIRfXCR82Xf6qEyy0XgPPJNy1l92 fG1WNG3jbAYTt50KilC9vmBItLu/yaHogIh1Fto4zxxl9rH2D+YSfMgsrsTAmcuoRT 2k/NiGxtTstCNOk4tdqCxzf0lIi5C1Dq5hlnfkkgkGUl0DdghLDGOAeTIWW3EeOXG8 mQWTl8hEs8HJR2u/x1j6Eg7suHsOdO2C/WuyrjdXqlbUS9r/6yeiCRufdyImou0Idj dSwWoCxKSZMwg== X-Authentication-Warning: plan-b.pwste.edu.pl: Host [IPv6:2001:470:71:d47:d8f1:6650:1109:cd1e] claimed to be fomalhaut.potoki.eu To: FreeBSD Current From: Marek Zarychta Subject: htcp is not NEWRENO:newreno Message-ID: Date: Wed, 26 May 2021 16:53:59 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.2 List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-current List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="qbUCwNwSxQX71yFSbWcoI0AQ7r3T9RHwS" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Fqv9J3H9Hz3NDp X-Spamd-Bar: ------- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=plan-b.pwste.edu.pl header.s=plan-b-mailer header.b=oahDxQWb; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=plan-b.pwste.edu.pl; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of zarychtam@plan-b.pwste.edu.pl has no SPF policy when checking 2001:678:618::40) smtp.mailfrom=zarychtam@plan-b.pwste.edu.pl X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-7.90 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; HAS_ATTACHMENT(0.00)[]; HAS_XAW(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[plan-b.pwste.edu.pl:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[plan-b.pwste.edu.pl,none]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; SIGNED_PGP(-2.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:+,3:~]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[2001:678:618::40:from]; ASN(0.00)[asn:206006, ipnet:2001:678:618::/48, country:PL]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[plan-b.pwste.edu.pl:s=plan-b-mailer]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_MED(-2.00)[pwste.edu.pl:dkim]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.20)[multipart/signed,multipart/mixed,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-current@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[2001:678:618::40:from:127.0.2.255]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-current] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --qbUCwNwSxQX71yFSbWcoI0AQ7r3T9RHwS Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="7sU4PyGLrhBLbPMljpA66ph2vRiz18ie1"; protected-headers="v1" From: Marek Zarychta To: FreeBSD Current Message-ID: Subject: htcp is not NEWRENO:newreno --7sU4PyGLrhBLbPMljpA66ph2vRiz18ie1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dear subscribers and devs, I am running CURRENT with RACK[1] and HTCP[2] and recently get kernel message buffer messages like this one: cc_algo:htcp is not NEWRENO:newreno Should I be worried about this assertion? [1] net.inet.tcp.functions_default=3Drack [2] net.inet.tcp.cc.algorithm=3Dhtcp --=20 Marek Zarychta --7sU4PyGLrhBLbPMljpA66ph2vRiz18ie1-- --qbUCwNwSxQX71yFSbWcoI0AQ7r3T9RHwS Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="OpenPGP_signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="OpenPGP_signature" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- wsB5BAABCAAjFiEEMOqvKm6wKvS1/ZeCdZ/s//1SjSwFAmCuYQcFAwAAAAAACgkQdZ/s//1SjSzo lwgAviMy8l+LOjRHRMtrimragwz+ZQo6mIrxkOBOhIJq+kbDS5EVM9azOhvOW/oqU79uGXuUP8iN mabAV2UL3qQQ/mLSalGmeXRjWTrhyd9TO1tWpeaGSHWV5SKrUmwC76XaqTuRrJqhR1BLBgyToZOz 0Hr1mi0ybVZfCY8rVQTdFvq084A+p7LQFaLc2P7AlogNyz6IrM4RvRoTm9epbV47C9ZAT1BwnboI +ow67rLWY8MR8rzyLw2jtIijEFl2NvQV6HctB6o+ABU9fSP3/OcpLHxnBmv00E7pBBj6wcKsVGRI QcLQz5E5aupEvcj7r1OeL/c6lOE42DiDF5Ag93thrA== =kTwJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --qbUCwNwSxQX71yFSbWcoI0AQ7r3T9RHwS-- From nobody Wed May 26 19:56:35 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-current@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AF4DC7C25A for ; Wed, 26 May 2021 19:56:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tuexen@freebsd.org) Received: from drew.franken.de (mail-n.franken.de [193.175.24.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.franken.de", Issuer "Sectigo RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Fr1tH1TdJz4bLH for ; Wed, 26 May 2021 19:56:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tuexen@freebsd.org) Received: from smtpclient.apple (unknown [IPv6:2a02:8109:1140:c3d:a8e6:622:a6d1:f7e3]) (Authenticated sender: macmic) by mail-n.franken.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8FE57721A5A0D; Wed, 26 May 2021 21:56:35 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-current List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.100.0.2.22\)) Subject: Re: htcp is not NEWRENO:newreno From: tuexen@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 26 May 2021 21:56:35 +0200 Cc: FreeBSD Current Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <86011951-7D33-4E7B-91E0-2DDC028295AB@freebsd.org> References: To: Marek Zarychta X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.100.0.2.22) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=disabled version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on mail-n.franken.de X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Fr1tH1TdJz4bLH X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N > On 26. May 2021, at 16:53, Marek Zarychta = wrote: >=20 > Dear subscribers and devs, >=20 > I am running CURRENT with RACK[1] and HTCP[2] and recently get kernel > message buffer messages like this one: > cc_algo:htcp is not NEWRENO:newreno > Should I be worried about this assertion? Hi Marek, RACK has been tested with newreno and some of its functionality requires = newreno. In this case dealing with ECN. RACK detects this and reports it. Best regards Michael >=20 > [1] net.inet.tcp.functions_default=3Drack > [2] net.inet.tcp.cc.algorithm=3Dhtcp > --=20 > Marek Zarychta >=20 From nobody Wed May 26 22:06:06 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-current@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD1F0CFE4A9 for ; Wed, 26 May 2021 22:06:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mueller6722@twc.com) Received: from p-impout004.msg.pkvw.co.charter.net (p-impout004aa.msg.pkvw.co.charter.net [47.43.26.135]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "Client", Issuer "CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Fr4lX5Qq9z4ryh for ; Wed, 26 May 2021 22:05:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mueller6722@twc.com) Received: from localhost ([96.28.177.163]) by cmsmtp with ESMTP id m1f4l3qyC6dA4m1f4lEHGe; Wed, 26 May 2021 22:05:58 +0000 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.4 cv=Xuw/hXJ9 c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=60aec646 a=xqrt2BZAGHte7XHhrxJgbA==:117 a=xqrt2BZAGHte7XHhrxJgbA==:17 a=HpEJnUlJZJkA:10 a=pGLkceISAAAA:8 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=qtYC2X8gm69WHi7JdDwA:9 a=IjZwj45LgO3ly-622nXo:22 Date: Wed, 26 May 2021 22:06:06 +0000 From: "Thomas Mueller" To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Spam mail being sent via the FreeBSD mailing lists Reply-To: postmaster@freebsd.org References: X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4xfHPIbciafknbAtB6dQ3u10rQ9wJXrz277mekIS6wC9o7mHFGlbr/3+SDstHarUgfR6Df3rs2k9JuRouLWvSoCK9z71Wz1bWpnkB8QLHYzJ0rilPbdCiR KIXbCdoJwSBYzgaxTSTslxpIJocf/tGZnSzBLz4OhY3stSN2GpzAYs0nzqzOH3uf+oODt43NEy/zrg== X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Fr4lX5Qq9z4ryh X-Spamd-Bar: ++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of mueller6722@twc.com designates 47.43.26.135 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=mueller6722@twc.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [2.51 / 15.00]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[postmaster@freebsd.org]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[twc.com]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:47.43.26.0/24]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[96.28.177.163:received]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[twc.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:40294, ipnet:47.43.24.0/21, country:US]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[47.43.26.135:from]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.99)[-0.985]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; REPLYTO_DOM_NEQ_FROM_DOM(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[twc.com]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.29)[0.291]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[47.43.26.135:from:127.0.2.255]; MISSING_MID(2.50)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(1.00)[1.000]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[47.43.26.135:from]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-current] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-current List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org from Kurt Jaeger: > Hi! > > > On May 25, 2021, at 8:53 PM, jake h wrote: > > > I have recently received several pieces of spam mail, apparently sent via > > > this mailing list. These pieces of mail are the usual spam formula; Your > > > phone has a virus, Ads, Fake blackmail, so on and so forth. > > > Has anyone else noticed these spam emails, or is it just me? > > I'm receiving these too. It looks like the servers are bouncing some of them just for me, even. And I'm receiving not just from this list; also from freebsd-hackers@ and ports@. > postmaster@ is aware of the problem, we do not yet have a clear-cut > solution and we're investigating. Maybe the problem of bouncing messages is related to the spam problem? I notice now there is an epidemic of multipart/alternative messages on FreeBSD lists, which is a recent change, not for the better. I posted, several days ago (May 22), a question about bouncing messages, that was on freebsd-questions@freebsd.org . Tom From nobody Thu May 27 01:04:53 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-current@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 189F2D7E3B9 for ; Thu, 27 May 2021 01:05:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from philip@freebsd.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::24b:4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Fr8k56gnyz59Bf; Thu, 27 May 2021 01:05:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from philip@freebsd.org) Received: from weatherwax.trouble.is (weatherwax.trouble.is [IPv6:2a00:1098:82:3a::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "weatherwax.trouble.is", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) (Authenticated sender: philip/mail) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B3DBE3336C; Thu, 27 May 2021 01:05:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from philip@freebsd.org) Received: from rincewind.trouble.is (rincewind.trouble.is [95.216.22.234]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256 client-signature ECDSA (P-256) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "rincewind.trouble.is", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by weatherwax.trouble.is (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Fr8k464nJz1tgF; Thu, 27 May 2021 01:05:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: by rincewind.trouble.is (Postfix, authenticated sender philip) id 4Fr8k16Hbkz5fpW; Thu, 27 May 2021 01:04:57 +0000 (UTC) From: Philip Paeps To: "Julian H. Stacey" Cc: postmaster@FreeBSD.org, Lucas Nali de =?utf-8?q?Magalh=C3=A3es?= , jake h , freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Spam mail being sent via the FreeBSD mailing lists Date: Thu, 27 May 2021 09:04:53 +0800 X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett X-Mailer: MailMate (1.14r5807) Message-ID: <1FCAC5FA-0091-458F-8B93-C2EFF0DE8824@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <202105261451.14QEov8j007524@fire.js.berklix.net> References: <202105261451.14QEov8j007524@fire.js.berklix.net> List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-current List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; markup=markdown X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N On 2021-05-26 22:50:57 (+0800), Julian H. Stacey wrote: > Kurt Jaeger wrote: >> Hi! >>>> On May 25, 2021, at 8:53 PM, jake h wrote: >>>> I have recently received several pieces of spam mail, apparently >>>> sent via >>>> this mailing list. These pieces of mail are the usual spam formula; >>>> Your >>>> phone has a virus, Ads, Fake blackmail, so on and so forth. >>>> Has anyone else noticed these spam emails, or is it just me? >>> I'm receiving these too. It looks like the servers are bouncing some >>> of them just for me, even. And I'm receiving not just from this >>> list; also from freebsd-hackers@ and ports@. >> >> postmaster@ is aware of the problem, we do not yet have a clear-cut >> solution and we're investigating. >> -- >> pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 Now what ? > > I'm on most lists & also seen much spam lately. > > Changing Mailman list configs to only allowing postings from > subscribed > addresses could dump nearly all spam; (I'm a Mailman admin elsewhere > ). This was how the majority of FreeBSD mailing lists were configured. Most lists were set to discard postings from non-subscribers. Some were set to hold. A few were set to reject. > But @freebsd.org has prefered open lists for near all lists. > Best only for the initial fresh- after- install- questions@, IMO. This has not been true for a good while now. Historically, nearly all our lists were indeed open. In recent years, we've made most lists subscriber-only, with some exceptions and whitelists. > List back end responses to eg isp@ & hackers@ have recently migrated > from Mailman to Mlmmj, I guess that shouldn't directly affect spam > protection ? but it'd be interesting to know what advantage the > migration might bring @freebsd.org ? For one thing, running supported software means we can continue upgrading our mailservers with fewer worries. Mailman 2 relies on Python 2, which has unfortunately become abandonware. Philip -- Philip Paeps Senior Reality Engineer Alternative Enterprises From nobody Thu May 27 01:57:30 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-current@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F367BF0F5F for ; Thu, 27 May 2021 01:57:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from thor@irk.ru) Received: from mail.irk.ru (relay2.dsi.ru [195.206.40.175]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Fr9tr3Lt4z3Gnd for ; Thu, 27 May 2021 01:57:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from thor@irk.ru) Received: from [194.176.114.54] (helo=[192.168.1.244]) by mail.irk.ru with esmtpa (Exim 4.86 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1lm5H8-000KW3-Tj for freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Thu, 27 May 2021 09:57:30 +0800 Subject: Re: Spam mail being sent via the FreeBSD mailing lists To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org References: From: Thor Ablestar Message-ID: <85eee939-d06b-2f2d-50da-5c11e56d2b54@irk.ru> Date: Thu, 27 May 2021 09:57:30 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.1 List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-current List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Fr9tr3Lt4z3Gnd X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=irk.ru; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of thor@irk.ru designates 195.206.40.175 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=thor@irk.ru X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.80 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[195.206.40.175:from]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[195.206.40.175:from:127.0.2.255]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[irk.ru,none]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:8345, ipnet:195.206.32.0/19, country:RU]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-current]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N Well, if you require "FreeBSD" somewhere in the letter with exception of "To" field it would be quite enough. You only have to announce that the "FreeBSD" keyword should be included. "Linux" is optional. Spammers have no idea what FreeBSD is. On 5/26/21 1:34 PM, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > Hi! > >>> On May 25, 2021, at 8:53 PM, jake h wrote: >>> I have recently received several pieces of spam mail, apparently sent via >>> this mailing list. These pieces of mail are the usual spam formula; Your >>> phone has a virus, Ads, Fake blackmail, so on and so forth. >>> Has anyone else noticed these spam emails, or is it just me? >> I'm receiving these too. It looks like the servers are bouncing some of them just for me, even. And I'm receiving not just from this list; also from freebsd-hackers@ and ports@. > postmaster@ is aware of the problem, we do not yet have a clear-cut > solution and we're investigating. > From nobody Thu May 27 11:41:45 2021 X-Original-To: current@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C2DFD7DFC0 for ; Thu, 27 May 2021 11:41:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david@catwhisker.org) Received: from mx.catwhisker.org (mx.catwhisker.org [107.204.234.170]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FrQrw2w6rz3FwN for ; Thu, 27 May 2021 11:41:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david@catwhisker.org) Received: from albert.catwhisker.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by albert.catwhisker.org (8.16.1/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 14RBfjmG059855 for ; Thu, 27 May 2021 11:41:45 GMT (envelope-from david@albert.catwhisker.org) Received: (from david@localhost) by albert.catwhisker.org (8.16.1/8.16.1/Submit) id 14RBfjOD059854 for current@freebsd.org; Thu, 27 May 2021 04:41:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from david) Date: Thu, 27 May 2021 04:41:45 -0700 From: David Wolfskill To: current@freebsd.org Subject: panic: device_unbusy: called for non-busy device iichid0 Message-ID: Reply-To: current@freebsd.org Mail-Followup-To: current@freebsd.org List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-current List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="pMgm7mm3HGoGmun9" Content-Disposition: inline X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FrQrw2w6rz3FwN X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of david@catwhisker.org designates 107.204.234.170 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=david@catwhisker.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.40 / 15.00]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[current@freebsd.org]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FREEFALL_USER(0.00)[david]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[107.204.234.170:from]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:107.204.234.170]; MIME_GOOD(-0.20)[multipart/signed,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[current@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[107.204.234.170:from:127.0.2.255]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[catwhisker.org]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; SIGNED_PGP(-2.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7018, ipnet:107.192.0.0/12, country:US]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[current]; REPLYTO_EQ_TO_ADDR(5.00)[] X-Spam: Yes X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N --pMgm7mm3HGoGmun9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable This was on the new(er) laptop with which I have been experimenting; it uses iichid to controll/access the built-in mouse/touchpad. The machine was running: FreeBSD g1-48.catwhisker.org 14.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 14.0-CURRENT #252 main-n2= 46951-38e7025a60b2: Wed May 26 04:56:25 PDT 2021 root@g1-48.catwhisker.= org:/common/S4/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/sys/CANARY amd64 1400017 1400017 at the time. Note that the reboot after building the above (yesterday) was without issue, and the reboot after the panic was also without issue -- so this would seem to have elements of timing/racing involved. (And it's likely to be distinctly unpleasant to debug, as it seems that reproduction may be rather "iffy.") I took a photo of the displayed backtrace; it's at https://www.catwhisker.org/~david/FreeBSD/head/n246951/device_unbusy.jpg Here's a slightly-abbreviated hand-transcribed version: panic: device_unbusy: called for non-busy device iichid0 cpuid =3D 8 time =3D 1622113818 KDB: stack backtrace: db_trace_self_wrapper() vpanic() panic() device_unbusy() iicbus_release_bus() iichid_intr() ithread-loop() fork_exit() fork_trampoline() --- trap 0, rip =3D 0, rsp =3D 0, rbp =3D 0 --- KDB: enter: panic [ thread pid 12 tid 100170 ] Stopped at 0xffffffff80c36867 =3D kdb_enter+ 0x37: $0,0x12a0b9e(%ri= p) db>=20 Peace, david --=20 David H. Wolfskill david@catwhisker.org Republican Congressional leaders are giving support to those who took up arms against the government of the United States on 06 January 2021. See https://www.catwhisker.org/~david/publickey.gpg for my public key. --pMgm7mm3HGoGmun9 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQGTBAEBCgB9FiEE4owz2QxMJyaxAefyQLJg+bY2PckFAmCvhXlfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldEUy OEMzM0Q5MEM0QzI3MjZCMTAxRTdGMjQwQjI2MEY5QjYzNjNEQzkACgkQQLJg+bY2 PcmJQQgApxr6vIVzwcZVY0IhWKTFMIJTz8w1KrQRD9YViwyELUfeVsr1+VPvsSAI n23DrR4os7nb/K1UYRnqtDIqaZKGSP3nCuHERhPMrFYNeyu/jgn48r0/Sfy9AptK 3waKiaTtkdoiiUVRTADaCvVOtC7QRWvH98DyehsA4YiEzzKZ3kyCXiUuNPh4F3Ap v1eqI0Keep0fzZLs1/FZVePXg9yo9u6dcV5JpD2y9gyxLChyz0R36xEFQiAzpa/2 Yjck6Pk6gTdAWra+S1M8Szr6TwV7Nah/xK2B7XxjSJ7dF9nMK+9/KNPFfaF2C5LP iDqxHEUtZIwMwlv6qQ+31hoilEpwJg== =2VNR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --pMgm7mm3HGoGmun9-- From nobody Thu May 27 15:15:04 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-current@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A98DBFA63C for ; Thu, 27 May 2021 15:16:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wulf@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::24b:4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FrWcZ0KMvz3qsk; Thu, 27 May 2021 15:16:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wulf@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [192.168.0.30] (unknown [94.45.211.173]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: wulf) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 804D319B2; Thu, 27 May 2021 15:16:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wulf@FreeBSD.org) Subject: Re: panic: device_unbusy: called for non-busy device iichid0 To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org References: Cc: Ian Lepore From: Vladimir Kondratyev Message-ID: <479c1e04-4dc9-bb97-5a07-bfd34873ae31@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 27 May 2021 18:15:04 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.0 List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-current List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N On 27.05.2021 14:41, David Wolfskill wrote: > This was on the new(er) laptop with which I have been experimenting; it > uses iichid to controll/access the built-in mouse/touchpad. > > The machine was running: > > FreeBSD g1-48.catwhisker.org 14.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 14.0-CURRENT #252 main-n246951-38e7025a60b2: Wed May 26 04:56:25 PDT 2021 root@g1-48.catwhisker.org:/common/S4/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/sys/CANARY amd64 1400017 1400017 > > at the time. Note that the reboot after building the above (yesterday) > was without issue, and the reboot after the panic was also without issue > -- so this would seem to have elements of timing/racing involved. (And > it's likely to be distinctly unpleasant to debug, as it seems that > reproduction may be rather "iffy.") > > I took a photo of the displayed backtrace; it's at > https://www.catwhisker.org/~david/FreeBSD/head/n246951/device_unbusy.jpg > > Here's a slightly-abbreviated hand-transcribed version: > > panic: device_unbusy: called for non-busy device iichid0 > cpuid = 8 > time = 1622113818 > KDB: stack backtrace: > db_trace_self_wrapper() > vpanic() > panic() > device_unbusy() > iicbus_release_bus() > iichid_intr() > ithread-loop() > fork_exit() > fork_trampoline() > --- trap 0, rip = 0, rsp = 0, rbp = 0 --- > KDB: enter: panic > [ thread pid 12 tid 100170 ] > Stopped at 0xffffffff80c36867 = kdb_enter+ 0x37: $0,0x12a0b9e(%rip) > db> > It looks like iicbus issue. It was very easy reproducible with iichid when latter had a bug triggering interrupt storm on device_attach: https://github.com/wulf7/iichid/issues/22 It was caused by unlocked calls to device_busy() and device_unbusy() in iicbus_request_bus() routine. These unlocked calls resulted in races with parallel device attachment process. CC-ed ian@ -- WBR Vladimir Kondratyev From nobody Fri May 28 11:11:06 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-current@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2788AD7C37D for ; Fri, 28 May 2021 11:11:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jakob@alvermark.net) Received: from out.alvermark.net (out.alvermark.net [185.34.136.138]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Fs2773PlSz4ndt for ; Fri, 28 May 2021 11:11:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jakob@alvermark.net) Received: from c-f649235c.06-431-73746f70.bbcust.telenor.se ([92.35.73.246] helo=mail.alvermark.net) by out.alvermark.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.91 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1lmaOR-0008vo-2D for freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Fri, 28 May 2021 13:11:07 +0200 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alvermark.net; s=x; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version: Date:Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=qnOm1AGXebBhKWgkozNAusI5w2gAZSi3SlOdKYfVn9c=; b=UDPpgUXq/jlhE7yx1bpwBTDaNB eXaOMV97489cwLRRjinqnvHkrl0KpaOQKXBwForPvv9tqS/2qZsekQQs/soZsjKPR2l0fTLmfShBl tFvZ6ztKVzveqJdS28lX/OFrAa0LfSexomAe95CXb3Sgmw82Q74lOSWfE/9xrrHBpvdzFi2UTOXh3 GPYAtAj1t/8SdfjuV8EPQSKt6P6KUhtkrK1vnhu0XZH21ykIMD5vGjZPOwsu+weQWd5QaVe4P7jmY DhR6Ua7M4susBlzTXNu8MYbNiwv5+Aie+5G6IKCHjqHTE4badLISxXeJDn8DcvEUB7hyce3lfV3zO Hwe4qL6w==; Received: from [192.168.67.27] by mail.alvermark.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.91 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1lmaOQ-000Bky-Eb for freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Fri, 28 May 2021 13:11:06 +0200 To: freebsd-current From: Jakob Alvermark Subject: Build fails with Filesize limit exceeded Message-ID: <49db89ac-a564-dd76-145b-b5f94abdc1ab@alvermark.net> Date: Fri, 28 May 2021 13:11:06 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.2 List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-current List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Fs2773PlSz4ndt X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=alvermark.net header.s=x header.b=UDPpgUXq; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of jakob@alvermark.net designates 185.34.136.138 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=jakob@alvermark.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.50 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[alvermark.net:s=x]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:185.34.136.138]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[alvermark.net: no valid DMARC record]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[185.34.136.138:from:127.0.2.255]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[alvermark.net:+]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[185.34.136.138:from]; ASN(0.00)[asn:34971, ipnet:185.34.136.0/23, country:IT]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-current] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N Hi, Building -current fails like this: --- kerberos5/lib/libasn1__L --- Building /usr/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/kerberos5/lib/libasn1/asn1_kx509_asn1.x Building /usr/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/kerberos5/lib/libasn1/asn1_rfc2459_asn1.c Building /usr/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/kerberos5/lib/libasn1/rfc2459_asn1.h Building /usr/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/kerberos5/lib/libasn1/rfc2459_asn1-priv.h --- rfc2459_asn1-priv.h --- Filesize limit exceeded *** [rfc2459_asn1-priv.h] Error code 153 make[4]: *** rfc2459_asn1-priv.h removed make[4]: stopped in /usr/src/kerberos5/lib/libasn1 .ERROR_TARGET='rfc2459_asn1-priv.h' .ERROR_META_FILE='/usr/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/kerberos5/lib/libasn1/rfc2459_asn1-priv.h.meta' .MAKE.LEVEL='4' MAKEFILE='' .MAKE.MODE='meta missing-filemon=yes missing-meta=yes silent=yes verbose' _ERROR_CMD='cp -f rfc2459_asn1-priv.hx rfc2459_asn1-priv.h;' .CURDIR='/usr/src/kerberos5/lib/libasn1' .MAKE='make' .OBJDIR='/usr/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/kerberos5/lib/libasn1' .TARGETS='all' DESTDIR='/usr/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/tmp' LD_LIBRARY_PATH='' MACHINE='amd64' MACHINE_ARCH='amd64' MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX='' MAKESYSPATH='/usr/src/share/mk' MAKE_VERSION='20210206' PATH='/usr/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/tmp/bin:/usr/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/tmp/usr/sbin:/usr/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/tmp/usr/bin:/usr/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/tmp/legacy/usr/sbin:/usr/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/tmp/legacy/usr/bin:/usr/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/tmp/legacy/bin:/usr/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/tmp/legacy/usr/libexec::/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin' SRCTOP='/usr/src' OBJTOP='/usr/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64' make[2]: stopped in /usr/src make[1]: stopped in /usr/src make: stopped in /usr/src I have tried clearing /usr/obj and restarting the build. I does not help. I checked out c235059bb7e, which is what I'm currently running, but that's not building either, same error, which I find strange since I obviously build it before. What's going on here? Thanks, Jakob From nobody Fri May 28 11:27:53 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-current@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B19F5D7DC1C for ; Fri, 28 May 2021 11:27:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david@catwhisker.org) Received: from mx.catwhisker.org (mx.catwhisker.org [107.204.234.170]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Fs2VQ2rRrz4qmR for ; Fri, 28 May 2021 11:27:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david@catwhisker.org) Received: from albert.catwhisker.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by albert.catwhisker.org (8.16.1/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 14SBRrFL076521; Fri, 28 May 2021 11:27:53 GMT (envelope-from david@albert.catwhisker.org) Received: (from david@localhost) by albert.catwhisker.org (8.16.1/8.16.1/Submit) id 14SBRrTr076520; Fri, 28 May 2021 04:27:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from david) Date: Fri, 28 May 2021 04:27:53 -0700 From: David Wolfskill To: Jakob Alvermark Cc: freebsd-current Subject: Re: Build fails with Filesize limit exceeded Message-ID: Reply-To: current@freebsd.org Mail-Followup-To: current@freebsd.org, Jakob Alvermark , freebsd-current References: <49db89ac-a564-dd76-145b-b5f94abdc1ab@alvermark.net> List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-current List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="8J41DW4VoQzsZmPd" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <49db89ac-a564-dd76-145b-b5f94abdc1ab@alvermark.net> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Fs2VQ2rRrz4qmR X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N --8J41DW4VoQzsZmPd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 01:11:06PM +0200, Jakob Alvermark wrote: > Hi, >=20 >=20 > Building -current fails like this: >=20 > --- kerberos5/lib/libasn1__L --- > Building=20 > /usr/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/kerberos5/lib/libasn1/asn1_kx509_asn1.x > Building=20 > /usr/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/kerberos5/lib/libasn1/asn1_rfc2459_asn1.c > Building /usr/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/kerberos5/lib/libasn1/rfc2459_asn1.h > Building=20 > /usr/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/kerberos5/lib/libasn1/rfc2459_asn1-priv.h > --- rfc2459_asn1-priv.h --- > Filesize limit exceeded > *** [rfc2459_asn1-priv.h] Error code 153 > make[4]: *** rfc2459_asn1-priv.h removed >=20 > make[4]: stopped in /usr/src/kerberos5/lib/libasn1 > .ERROR_TARGET=3D'rfc2459_asn1-priv.h' > .ERROR_META_FILE=3D'/usr/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/kerberos5/lib/libasn1/rf= c2459_asn1-priv.h.meta' > .MAKE.LEVEL=3D'4' > MAKEFILE=3D'' > .MAKE.MODE=3D'meta missing-filemon=3Dyes missing-meta=3Dyes silent=3Dyes = verbose' > _ERROR_CMD=3D'cp -f rfc2459_asn1-priv.hx rfc2459_asn1-priv.h;' > .CURDIR=3D'/usr/src/kerberos5/lib/libasn1' > ... >=20 > make: stopped in /usr/src >=20 >=20 >=20 > I have tried clearing /usr/obj and restarting the build. I does not help. >=20 > I checked out c235059bb7e, which is what I'm currently running, but=20 > that's not building either, same error, which I find strange since I=20 > obviously build it before. >=20 > What's going on here? > .... Not sure; I don't see that, and I just finished doing in-place source updates from main-n246951-38e7025a60b2 to main-n246995-c0f171736a70 on 3 machines without issue -- also using META_MODE, as you are. You might want to see if that .ERROR_META_FILE has any useful hints in it. FWIW, looks as if c235059bb7e corresponds to main-n246842-c235059bb7e6; checking my update history, I updated from main-n246829-42881526d401 to main-n246861-ef0f7ae934b0 last Sunday (23 May). Peace, david --=20 David H. Wolfskill david@catwhisker.org "...the canard that the election was stolen is being repeated daily on major news outlets ... not to mention in the near-daily fulminations of the former President." - Federal Judge Amy Berman Jackson See https://www.catwhisker.org/~david/publickey.gpg for my public key. --8J41DW4VoQzsZmPd Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQGTBAEBCgB9FiEE4owz2QxMJyaxAefyQLJg+bY2PckFAmCw07lfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldEUy OEMzM0Q5MEM0QzI3MjZCMTAxRTdGMjQwQjI2MEY5QjYzNjNEQzkACgkQQLJg+bY2 PckR9Qf/a3Vv9BlHYiWrsr4L0YzZH5+yWs41VEkv8ahKg/fnlHKgnHaFA4tLqXTr Vay+fmAw3fdfjj42yQQlYBXC5wlXSRN/5OANKV1eDNm/bMug2NIpV5DxOinzBpSr Hf1VDwnzlVtFx395yfLYRW06NQNmoXDFlBDb/LbxX8HpYv7j4uZ8tE7iAQkaKVcT zPVPJgXVBu+gColmdDoVLajoS/m4F1d4urFVFISB5Ob/BtKhaqtkeHgmbWB7Yg+b KuY0ofXMKEcj0ZM+YGYocOgg2G+8nOH0/+xMjUL4ZgRoOn0hTKmhERFWfq0WbDbN yMaYgjhEUDSw4c6qise4OMTvNpdAqw== =FnP8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --8J41DW4VoQzsZmPd-- From nobody Fri May 28 11:38:37 2021 X-Original-To: current@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9093D7EABF for ; Fri, 28 May 2021 11:38:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jakob@alvermark.net) Received: from out.alvermark.net (out.alvermark.net [185.34.136.138]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Fs2kl4KSMz4rw6 for ; Fri, 28 May 2021 11:38:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jakob@alvermark.net) Received: from c-f649235c.06-431-73746f70.bbcust.telenor.se ([92.35.73.246] helo=mail.alvermark.net) by out.alvermark.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.91 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1lmap3-00094k-Vw for current@freebsd.org; Fri, 28 May 2021 13:38:37 +0200 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alvermark.net; s=x; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To: MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:References:To:Subject:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=N9rD9jpeJUIsEJwFop/e6cyMDcRSPZM6WISyvdUtOKE=; b=GBjYpemO4neQ6tcmITLYHupv0U JO5to3BPXd+zr3coWNiSZsKDPs6vN4ckCG+h8xKvWkxMsuOWcE+XwmtUKE1tgDrCv4FHy6DbMRo4d vzlOT/4t+h1VWfZb4cNJPoyowi+Ej9zHQ2O0Bh2aEX2OH7TArCHN52cX7sFkzxe9x6foEO4NCcuhj 8QJHn2tIBk7LDiju3Xufg5Vboqr6O3ifcVMTvGSH4LMj40Tn17oupWwgdrPPTfcUMNrAP2R83AfZJ X+dU45TPJv8VtKPWGO58tYJVEacBJjOxTNE2kMDUgUV7ntJ6WPA+pFwmFxK+ZTWvDMtbujpujtoLb lNzVdE0Q==; Received: from [192.168.67.27] by mail.alvermark.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.91 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1lmap3-000Bxw-9v for current@freebsd.org; Fri, 28 May 2021 13:38:37 +0200 Subject: Re: Build fails with Filesize limit exceeded To: current@freebsd.org References: <49db89ac-a564-dd76-145b-b5f94abdc1ab@alvermark.net> From: Jakob Alvermark Message-ID: <06d59c7e-9d85-5594-615a-3ed98aef6ab7@alvermark.net> Date: Fri, 28 May 2021 13:38:37 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.2 List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-current List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Fs2kl4KSMz4rw6 X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N On 5/28/21 1:27 PM, David Wolfskill wrote: > On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 01:11:06PM +0200, Jakob Alvermark wrote: >> Hi, >> >> >> Building -current fails like this: >> >> --- kerberos5/lib/libasn1__L --- >> Building >> /usr/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/kerberos5/lib/libasn1/asn1_kx509_asn1.x >> Building >> /usr/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/kerberos5/lib/libasn1/asn1_rfc2459_asn1.c >> Building /usr/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/kerberos5/lib/libasn1/rfc2459_asn1.h >> Building >> /usr/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/kerberos5/lib/libasn1/rfc2459_asn1-priv.h >> --- rfc2459_asn1-priv.h --- >> Filesize limit exceeded >> *** [rfc2459_asn1-priv.h] Error code 153 >> make[4]: *** rfc2459_asn1-priv.h removed >> >> make[4]: stopped in /usr/src/kerberos5/lib/libasn1 >> .ERROR_TARGET='rfc2459_asn1-priv.h' >> .ERROR_META_FILE='/usr/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/kerberos5/lib/libasn1/rfc2459_asn1-priv.h.meta' >> .MAKE.LEVEL='4' >> MAKEFILE='' >> .MAKE.MODE='meta missing-filemon=yes missing-meta=yes silent=yes verbose' >> _ERROR_CMD='cp -f rfc2459_asn1-priv.hx rfc2459_asn1-priv.h;' >> .CURDIR='/usr/src/kerberos5/lib/libasn1' >> ... >> >> make: stopped in /usr/src >> >> >> >> I have tried clearing /usr/obj and restarting the build. I does not help. >> >> I checked out c235059bb7e, which is what I'm currently running, but >> that's not building either, same error, which I find strange since I >> obviously build it before. >> >> What's going on here? >> .... > Not sure; I don't see that, and I just finished doing in-place source > updates from main-n246951-38e7025a60b2 to main-n246995-c0f171736a70 on 3 > machines without issue -- also using META_MODE, as you are. > > You might want to see if that .ERROR_META_FILE has any useful hints in > it. > > FWIW, looks as if c235059bb7e corresponds to main-n246842-c235059bb7e6; > checking my update history, I updated from main-n246829-42881526d401 to > main-n246861-ef0f7ae934b0 last Sunday (23 May). The .ERROR_META_FILE looks like this: # Meta data file /usr/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/kerberos5/lib/libasn1/rfc2459_asn1 -priv.h.meta CMD cp -f rfc2459_asn1-priv.hx rfc2459_asn1-priv.h CWD /usr/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/kerberos5/lib/libasn1 TARGET rfc2459_asn1-priv.h OODATE rfc2459_asn1-priv.hx -- command output -- Filesize limit exceeded *** Error code 153 -- filemon acquired metadata -- # filemon version 5 # Target pid 2712 # Start 1622199976.763651 V 5 E 2739 /bin/sh R 2739 /etc/libmap.conf R 2739 /var/run/ld-elf.so.hints R 2739 /lib/libedit.so.8 R 2739 /lib/libc.so.7 R 2739 /lib/libncursesw.so.9 R 2739 /usr/share/locale/C.UTF-8/LC_CTYPE F 2739 2740 E 2740 /usr/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/tmp/legacy/usr/sbin/cp R 2740 /etc/libmap.conf R 2740 /var/run/ld-elf.so.hints R 2740 /lib/libc.so.7 R 2740 rfc2459_asn1-priv.hx W 2740 rfc2459_asn1-priv.h X 2740 0 25 X 2739 153 0 # Stop 1622199976.768649 # Bye bye Doing: # cd /usr/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/kerberos5/lib/libasn1 and: # cp -f rfc2459_asn1-priv.hx rfc2459_asn1-priv.h Gives me: Filesize limit exceeded # ls -l rfc2459_asn1-priv.hx rfc2459_asn1-priv.h -rw-r--r--  1 root  wheel  0 May 28 13:29 rfc2459_asn1-priv.h -rw-r--r--  1 root  wheel  0 May 28 13:06 rfc2459_asn1-priv.hx Hmmm...? Jakob From nobody Fri May 28 11:59:48 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-current@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B2EFD7FDBF for ; Fri, 28 May 2021 12:00:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: from kib.kiev.ua (kib.kiev.ua [IPv6:2001:470:d5e7:1::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Fs3CT1bD1z4tmd for ; Fri, 28 May 2021 12:00:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: from tom.home (kib@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kib.kiev.ua (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPS id 14SBxnND083549 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 28 May 2021 14:59:52 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 kib.kiev.ua 14SBxnND083549 Received: (from kostik@localhost) by tom.home (8.16.1/8.16.1/Submit) id 14SBxmuE083548; Fri, 28 May 2021 14:59:48 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) X-Authentication-Warning: tom.home: kostik set sender to kostikbel@gmail.com using -f Date: Fri, 28 May 2021 14:59:48 +0300 From: Konstantin Belousov To: Jakob Alvermark Cc: freebsd-current Subject: Re: Build fails with Filesize limit exceeded Message-ID: References: <49db89ac-a564-dd76-145b-b5f94abdc1ab@alvermark.net> List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-current List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <49db89ac-a564-dd76-145b-b5f94abdc1ab@alvermark.net> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,FREEMAIL_FROM, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.5 (2021-03-20) on tom.home X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Fs3CT1bD1z4tmd X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 01:11:06PM +0200, Jakob Alvermark wrote: > Hi, > > > Building -current fails like this: > > --- kerberos5/lib/libasn1__L --- > Building > /usr/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/kerberos5/lib/libasn1/asn1_kx509_asn1.x > Building > /usr/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/kerberos5/lib/libasn1/asn1_rfc2459_asn1.c > Building /usr/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/kerberos5/lib/libasn1/rfc2459_asn1.h > Building > /usr/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/kerberos5/lib/libasn1/rfc2459_asn1-priv.h > --- rfc2459_asn1-priv.h --- > Filesize limit exceeded > *** [rfc2459_asn1-priv.h] Error code 153 > make[4]: *** rfc2459_asn1-priv.h removed > > make[4]: stopped in /usr/src/kerberos5/lib/libasn1 > .ERROR_TARGET='rfc2459_asn1-priv.h' > .ERROR_META_FILE='/usr/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/kerberos5/lib/libasn1/rfc2459_asn1-priv.h.meta' > .MAKE.LEVEL='4' > MAKEFILE='' > .MAKE.MODE='meta missing-filemon=yes missing-meta=yes silent=yes verbose' > _ERROR_CMD='cp -f rfc2459_asn1-priv.hx rfc2459_asn1-priv.h;' > .CURDIR='/usr/src/kerberos5/lib/libasn1' > .MAKE='make' > .OBJDIR='/usr/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/kerberos5/lib/libasn1' > .TARGETS='all' > DESTDIR='/usr/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/tmp' > LD_LIBRARY_PATH='' > MACHINE='amd64' > MACHINE_ARCH='amd64' > MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX='' > MAKESYSPATH='/usr/src/share/mk' > MAKE_VERSION='20210206' > PATH='/usr/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/tmp/bin:/usr/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/tmp/usr/sbin:/usr/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/tmp/usr/bin:/usr/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/tmp/legacy/usr/sbin:/usr/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/tmp/legacy/usr/bin:/usr/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/tmp/legacy/bin:/usr/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/tmp/legacy/usr/libexec::/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin' > SRCTOP='/usr/src' > OBJTOP='/usr/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64' > > make[2]: stopped in /usr/src > > make[1]: stopped in /usr/src > > make: stopped in /usr/src > > > > I have tried clearing /usr/obj and restarting the build. I does not help. > > I checked out c235059bb7e, which is what I'm currently running, but that's > not building either, same error, which I find strange since I obviously > build it before. > > What's going on here? You need e71d5c7331700504e58cf1a35d. Build just a kernel from today sources, install it and reboot. From nobody Fri May 28 12:26:02 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-current@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F1BFBF1B4C for ; Fri, 28 May 2021 12:26:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pen@lysator.liu.se) Received: from mail.lysator.liu.se (mail.lysator.liu.se [130.236.254.3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Fs3nZ3K57z3D67 for ; Fri, 28 May 2021 12:26:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pen@lysator.liu.se) Received: from mail.lysator.liu.se (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.lysator.liu.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 902E940012 for ; Fri, 28 May 2021 14:26:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail.lysator.liu.se (Postfix, from userid 1004) id 7370940008; Fri, 28 May 2021 14:26:06 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on bernadotte.lysator.liu.se X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,HTML_MESSAGE, T_FILL_THIS_FORM_FRAUD_PHISH,T_FILL_THIS_FORM_SHORT autolearn=disabled version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Score: -1.0 Received: from smtpclient.apple (unknown [IPv6:2001:6b0:17:f002:1000::498]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.lysator.liu.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9141440006 for ; Fri, 28 May 2021 14:26:02 +0200 (CEST) From: Peter Eriksson Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_E681EBCC-535B-4802-8E49-2746D6F3B42A" List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-current List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.80.0.2.43\)) Subject: pam_radius fails after the latest libradius security patch... Message-Id: Date: Fri, 28 May 2021 14:26:02 +0200 To: freebsd-current X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.80.0.2.43) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Fs3nZ3K57z3D67 X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=liu.se; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of pen@lysator.liu.se designates 130.236.254.3 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=pen@lysator.liu.se X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.50 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-current@freebsd.org]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED(-0.20)[130.236.254.3:from]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[liu.se,none]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+a:mail.lysator.liu.se]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; ASN(0.00)[asn:2843, ipnet:130.236.0.0/16, country:SE]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-current] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: Y --Apple-Mail=_E681EBCC-535B-4802-8E49-2746D6F3B42A Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 After upgrading FreeBSD 12.2 in order to get the fix from 'FreeBSD = Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-21:12.libradius=E2=80=99 sudo with = pam_radius has started to fail for us. It correctly seems to communicate = with the RADIUS server (used to trigger MFA authentication, so I get an = authentication popup in the Microsoft Authenticar App) after entering = the unix password first, but then something fails: % sudo su Password: sudo: PAM authentication error: Error in service module sudo: a password is required pam.d/sudo config file: # auth auth requisite pam_unix.so no_warn = try_first_pass auth requisite pam_radius.so use_first_pass # account account include system # session session required pam_permit.so # password password include system Dunno if the problem is in sudo, libpam, libradius or pam_radius but the = only thing changed is libradius. And if I replace libradius.so.4 with = the previous version things work again... (Considering the spagetti code that sudo is I wouldn=E2=80=99t be = surprised if the bug is there but still=E2=80=A6) Am I the only one seeing this? - Peter --Apple-Mail=_E681EBCC-535B-4802-8E49-2746D6F3B42A-- From nobody Fri May 28 18:37:14 2021 X-Original-To: current@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E58AC7DA7B for ; Fri, 28 May 2021 18:37:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mat@freebsd.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [96.47.72.83]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FsD1t3ZPvz4V0c; Fri, 28 May 2021 18:37:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mat@freebsd.org) Received: from mail.j.mat.cc (owncloud.cube.mat.cc [IPv6:2a01:678:4:1::228]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.mat.cc", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) (Authenticated sender: mat/mail) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 40B4CEE1A; Fri, 28 May 2021 18:37:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mat@freebsd.org) Received: from aching.in.mat.cc (unknown [IPv6:2a01:678:42:0:e702:3e94:a946:45ec]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mat@mat.cc) by mail.j.mat.cc (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F20A9942D80; Fri, 28 May 2021 18:37:16 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 28 May 2021 20:37:14 +0200 From: Mathieu Arnold To: Michael Gmelin Cc: Kurt Jaeger , current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: zpool upgrade and bootcode on 13-RELEASE Message-ID: <20210528183714.7xbmuouxlxxy3n6j@aching.in.mat.cc> References: <20210519153757.4e00e96f@bsd64.grem.de> <20210519193243.3fd82d19@bsd64.grem.de> List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-current List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="kmywjhzvlsiowhzh" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210519193243.3fd82d19@bsd64.grem.de> X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N --kmywjhzvlsiowhzh Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 07:32:43PM +0200, Michael Gmelin wrote: >=20 >=20 > On Wed, 19 May 2021 19:09:06 +0200 > Kurt Jaeger wrote: >=20 > > Hi! > >=20 > > > Does this mean, re-installing the bootcode isn't necessary anymore > > > - or has the warning been removed by accident/as a side effect of > > > merging with OpenZFS? =20 > >=20 > > On the contrary, because of the switch from FreeBSD ZFS to > > OpenZFS, the bootcodes needs to be updated! It's unfortunate > > that no message is displayed 8-( > >=20 >=20 > That's too bad - maybe it would make sense to mention this in the > release errata? >=20 > > The problem is, finding out which bootcode needs to go where etc. >=20 > For the machines in question it was a straightforward legacy layout, so > that was easy enough (they came back up just fine - *phew*). >=20 > Do you think there is any chance to get the warning back in there? > Maybe in a more generic way, like: >=20 > In case you're booting from , please make sure to update > the bootcode according to your partition layout. See `man zfsboot' > for details. >=20 > Fun fact: That man page already exists (I had no idea), but could use > some love - e.g., add the EFI examples you gave. I have had a look at that man page, it gives ten different commands, without saying which you need to use, if they are all needed, or not, or when you actually have to used them. Fun fact is that I absolutely never ever used any of them. All I ever did was run: gpart bootcode -b /boot/pmbr -p /boot/gptzfsboot -i 1 ada1 because `zpool upgrade` told me to. It would probably be great to have that command in that man page. --=20 Mathieu Arnold --kmywjhzvlsiowhzh Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQKTBAABCgB9FiEEVhwchfRfuV0unqO5KesJApEdfgIFAmCxOFVfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDU2 MUMxQzg1RjQ1RkI5NUQyRTlFQTNCOTI5RUIwOTAyOTExRDdFMDIACgkQKesJApEd fgLd8A/8CsRXLRnwFYSceOrQBPLIHrhFmGRc3ox96t5/+lnWkBnKVJZGLEOMGzJ8 YNiwHPDI6VLCpyGtsEx8X4qcWOb6Kk4Rh6iEWcIorneDhWUk/gW11vbHN8cvvlgi Gz1WRgyMRHx2i16do0LCzY840HaryOoA4KvRRYNwlWNBZT9LRovMD4SfPYb3oX0Z gsxxFJAkQrvvCqNHEN3nptDd4mA5Kghb/+QoEEaa6iWltfJ5lLiuXqhh1LIxrXrJ CXyp4rOmUZXH0QNwW6jl0bJ0yD6tJ2ng257nfRAskNwWqyUITkKPFwYWFmeFo2O3 KNRyBfa5xRJWsfycAh7ir1WOxnbJ0iAPpMAJNJq6a0ZW39yAzVxJjf2oAKVWNMwq OP9srsJM535RjVnnbg3JYHEFX+XNkePzwpQT9rJBk+bOL2EbQ8LzX9RkKOznUoJ1 2oJ7lfHdRIEPSqtzbUJbJI67aROsMiuf3ssvKgnHso5TXGvqLIxz/2temYkk/Z7L yVRkqyjR1i0IMvZcEmDwuIKyG9z1C8LGfOxdVY/MQ0mYWswT28BhNeSn6iJJ3KsS Mqb9EL9WzdSzJW2OR8oRhFVtyVoij1KRikY3lL6UPjMK7pd1+qybThtqhu49pTYA QXETXip9XPMV2WXtx7uURwZ1o2FEDIbUPJECBkc0y4K+537mlTk= =sSoy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --kmywjhzvlsiowhzh-- From nobody Fri May 28 18:50:52 2021 X-Original-To: current@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11C8FC7F72C for ; Fri, 28 May 2021 18:50:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@grem.de) Received: from mail.evolve.de (mail.evolve.de [213.239.217.29]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA512 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mail.evolve.de", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FsDKY4FSkz4X3K; Fri, 28 May 2021 18:50:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@grem.de) Received: by mail.evolve.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 74a1d5dc; Fri, 28 May 2021 18:50:54 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=grem.de; h=date:from:to:cc :subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=20180501; bh=gT/tfa8x pGMWOYKHJbXWapmvPBY=; b=tZDT96BpvDR83Bl3hB7a6d08caQBngZfg1Ra3PZd Sdb9LcpDyhi6KZWxP0cYcK/oiuqPqgOGAu1AVmdI+MfSrJYJFhhulYhwfPmPnjNV 7jaL1YYMUuay3KVg/gHWlfF8ZZIraFIbQGXmM5gRUgFtm0WyC+4Jq43AppOLFB0O xwe0Ehv5eyjCceVcauMOfg7EuAMYW82yh2za7NAG03vCoDv3OiD26Ss6mZRZFz9d yj+fypu4tGfUzqdTXFqdvWI8/lOYod/iMRHcx88bgTPwH2Lwoai9PN70ao5zA1VN pwnlpKCQ0vpxB8aq+PK8N5MQ4qRT7zLPlhbHiIEaC17Mkw== DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=grem.de; h=date:from:to:cc :subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=20180501; b=PE J1fpByXSg33Na2nor/rHdo0F+XYKFVZ5NAYFl7AltNPJgK5ggWN71lquzAEHEcss z1bRZ+rW1HZIHhCdJ/zkszC1xTqpWn15PEcVbHv52WhKh0BbaYJR+v19i1/Peb3P qr8saflp43fzCIIdvnVEADe2ABfrz0BAHn90FEObYxgQuEHfUxHF0YPVJrGwfKQD k8RATDh0ECQWgebSN6IupSxLrQSKdUxvY1gm8L06clkBKRun9ZdA6Yxq5dongn+8 zT7qFUy8BiIXchCMXprp+ZLoNRwOxputJMNEW7EJKa6KJMpkxG3T1jzFKrulp5kf f77jo21LdcFrMuxWujVA== Received: by mail.evolve.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id c4c25d9b (TLSv1.3:AEAD-CHACHA20-POLY1305-SHA256:256:NO); Fri, 28 May 2021 18:50:54 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 28 May 2021 20:50:52 +0200 From: Michael Gmelin To: Mathieu Arnold Cc: Michael Gmelin , Kurt Jaeger , current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: zpool upgrade and bootcode on 13-RELEASE Message-ID: <20210528205052.1c464a8f@bsd64.grem.de> In-Reply-To: <20210528183714.7xbmuouxlxxy3n6j@aching.in.mat.cc> References: <20210519153757.4e00e96f@bsd64.grem.de> <20210519193243.3fd82d19@bsd64.grem.de> <20210528183714.7xbmuouxlxxy3n6j@aching.in.mat.cc> X-Face: $wrgCtfdVw_H9WAY?S&9+/F"!41z'L$uo*WzT8miX?kZ~W~Lr5W7v?j0Sde\mwB&/ypo^}> +a'4xMc^^KroE~+v^&^#[B">soBo1y6(TW6#UZiC]o>C6`ej+i Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAJFBMVEWJBwe5BQDl LASZU0/LTEWEfHbyj0Txi32+sKrp1Mv944X8/fm1rS+cAAAACXBIWXMAAAsTAAAL EwEAmpwYAAAAB3RJTUUH3wESCxwC7OBhbgAAACFpVFh0Q29tbWVudAAAAAAAQ3Jl YXRlZCB3aXRoIFRoZSBHSU1QbbCXAAAAAghJREFUOMu11DFvEzEUAGCfEhBVFzuq AKkLd0O6VrIQsLXVSZXoWE5N1K3DobBBA9fQpRWc8OkWouaIjedWKiyREOKs+3PY fvalCNjgLVHeF7/3bMtBzV8C/VsQ8tecEgCcDgrzjekwKZ7TwsJZd/ywEKwwP+ZM 8P3drTsAwWn2mpWuDDuYiK1bFs6De0KUUFw0tWxm+D4AIhuuvZqtyWYeO7jQ4Aea 7jUqI+ixhQoHex4WshEvSXdood7stlv4oSuFOC4tqGcr0NjEqXgV4mMJO38nld4+ xKNxRDon7khyKVqY7YR4d+Cg0OMrkWXZOM7YDkEfKiilCn1qYv4mighZiynuHHOA Wq9QJq+BIES7lMFUtcikMnkDGHUoncA+uHgrP0ctIEqfwLHzeSo+eUA66AqzwN6n 2ZHJhw6Qh/PoyC/QENyEyC/AyNjq74Bs+3UH0xYwzDUC4B97HgLocg1QLYgDDO1v f3UX9Y307Ew4AHh67YAFFsxEpkXwpXY3eIgMhAAE3R19L919nNnuD2wlPcDE3UeT L2ytEICQib9BXgS2fU8PrD82ToYO1OEmMSnYTjSqSv9wdC0tPYC+rQRQD9ESnldF CyqfmiYW+tlALt8gH2xrMdC/youbjzPXEun+/ReXsMCDyve3dZc09fn2Oas8oXGc Jj6/fOeK5UmSMPmf/jL+GD8BEj0k/Fn6IO4AAAAASUVORK5CYII= List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-current List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FsDKY4FSkz4X3K X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N On Fri, 28 May 2021 20:37:14 +0200 Mathieu Arnold wrote: > On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 07:32:43PM +0200, Michael Gmelin wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, 19 May 2021 19:09:06 +0200 > > Kurt Jaeger wrote: > > > > > Hi! > > > > > > > Does this mean, re-installing the bootcode isn't necessary > > > > anymore > > > > - or has the warning been removed by accident/as a side effect > > > > of merging with OpenZFS? > > > > > > On the contrary, because of the switch from FreeBSD ZFS to > > > OpenZFS, the bootcodes needs to be updated! It's unfortunate > > > that no message is displayed 8-( > > > > > > > That's too bad - maybe it would make sense to mention this in the > > release errata? > > > > > The problem is, finding out which bootcode needs to go where etc. > > > > > > > For the machines in question it was a straightforward legacy > > layout, so that was easy enough (they came back up just fine - > > *phew*). > > > > Do you think there is any chance to get the warning back in there? > > Maybe in a more generic way, like: > > > > In case you're booting from , please make sure to update > > the bootcode according to your partition layout. See `man zfsboot' > > for details. > > > > Fun fact: That man page already exists (I had no idea), but could > > use some love - e.g., add the EFI examples you gave. > > I have had a look at that man page, it gives ten different commands, > without saying which you need to use, if they are all needed, or not, > or when you actually have to used them. > > Fun fact is that I absolutely never ever used any of them. All I ever > did was run: > > gpart bootcode -b /boot/pmbr -p /boot/gptzfsboot -i 1 ada1 > > because `zpool upgrade` told me to. It would probably be great to > have that command in that man page. > Hi Mathieu, I opened a pull request upstream. It already has been reviewed and accepted, but is yet to be merged: https://github.com/openzfs/zfs/pull/12104 The bootcode warning is now only shown for pools that have bootfs set (which should be fine on most "normal" installations) and reads like this: Pool 'testpool8' has the bootfs property set, you might need to update the boot code. See gptzfsboot(8) and loader.efi(8) for details. I figured that these are the most relevant man pages for current systems. It would make sense to update these man pages to be more helpful (latest, when this change lands in FreeBSD, but earlier obviously won't hurt). Best Michael -- Michael Gmelin From nobody Sat May 29 08:15:34 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-current@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A028AC7AA60 for ; Sat, 29 May 2021 08:15:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marklmi@yahoo.com) Received: from sonic311-23.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (sonic311-23.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com [98.137.65.204]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FsZB72SMqz4RH9 for ; Sat, 29 May 2021 08:15:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marklmi@yahoo.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1622276141; bh=a1G8Y2IXEM3EUYx2C8xz26hmHmUhUCoOlnvfxzWeCA0=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To:From:Subject:Reply-To; b=qkL68s7NximAoNF0qPuYFGp2nGIKLYIvaTn2zpE4SIvoFojRvyv1fwa9cOqP25W3e6D93Wpwe64F+Qx83wNLI07nkzJiRRYnR7WQfjRebCBw4zQuovFpZ3avahtQsC4/7Qi52Dvg6rONjeaMi4b3qk/dhV5zOe9kfQ7R3mza148JsEc3DtxlAqIrzUguftZrxTmewldykCEiYj1lucbHlaqLMpEAL8NFp3eQ3/XDQZg/BVivnGuDGwZihX6oG9AoOkH1/Z1p0faGQOBTNz49iRwbSErxpkSMinLG9loi49mEmmDsHYTH75gGLYKr1R6clMT/eTHTGQi9wi/gf/9L8Q== X-SONIC-DKIM-SIGN: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1622276141; bh=TcY+mGX/lvhW22avQ0zXzYqm0UKG22QpmroXZUuX9e0=; h=X-Sonic-MF:Subject:From:Date:To:From:Subject; b=blCkcIW9vJjU35myTqIsv0BXuy3lEOflBuGMn6x6AJR+mL7uY/q39FGM4wGyN0BNKiNRDtolTqyKfeQ/REOatGid6lEbcnBmvMEQFgmbUl8rsRBRFaC3qH0tIfLOnrcM4FL94JMDlXYcds9pxxX+h65JttEFTXM2Bu2tLGwjOGNhBLtr7V6SEekCW76NOgK2YGgeeEeV3annGHIL7HZRhgnu07LIR/beaJifmTWMVY+IhfhT8+fGZ6EmqA8fcYKpyBYJLsA2Nov+1AV7EtCxjQOHXgdFmAsCT+qdZmRY0TAvYUsLQaAf+TnQ3+O5Vt1zOd/KlE4vWJVg7YolH6EutA== X-YMail-OSG: jEJOUgwVM1mSOad78CFG5xxGNRHHiuYA3HAh2M2Iap3UYK0kOhCTWHE59YiU0S5 TAZU9YB53MJG6S0gFgtUbP1z5HrqO1y4A_TvX.NpjZU4goPMX0L2HRk736Kq.n0sVF5HUCtKMAhF IZNPaRGQVtRi9aLIsgsqOJYSPQI_nyeZsRO4Wtoab0GUkXLBjCogw.hFuWcEnskP802IFkYHHv15 kCmLsK2qXGWxm3SGP18bZlJ0eWGjlTob2u6DpIRkzIJJKl60wFJ6X.uNPsNmmvrvHTOA1cOwdn94 JqEvPg5Pq6DMPw6NMwbBgNUckFasrRPIHPdlzuLBtWnw2FftLetRcwRXv4.QxCq8vIoLPklWBOo4 UGKS31d_lceBnnK9VQtELYBrIozdlY0ufHD1Z2y.w5nCPnoxhXnZEXk9DzWNy9gXdhb8X47mwoRe EOPTy2_2543BOz0HKrrrumpnU9q26SlF9RJaeB25ZSWRuF5s0QWgUWXV3y5yECVW4lYabqVyvUHA I5oEXYGI9SpX3UBcGqEy7xJMwUWYucSqbONhheP2pszhl2xSimsX33XN7Lge1DHGhkbtWFD6dnSE .p1n81AqBGaJaJLkLDOHQHuD77YvOzv2CEk6CuzxfVsbFEktKeYtwA912RDeEHs3griFBZcCaDcv YgV4hQkT.JqxpZSbMWGKpOEv7RM1PE_n0s7xScnLghAcJjoIu7jtWj0Al5yQ_kmCto9rHuHbidqR IiUiHNs0GLTEgq6NURi9.NF7YQkXoJa.BWFArrsNyZoqVZ8F6fiZghPFaMFJKJm8_idcsgFKoqlL ygC5BSYavUr_MZt5pI1B2FMMqWru4R5Ou_Fu5UPQ.oumyxSC_OYVfplR34lrEeL7aUz3FDSiEgKt bak0a79879cduUX.3HwYGEGSqdMkkE5toRUzVU28PEHOjZweE8ijDDNmsPpOL8EbwOJZjtp4z66V LUN.0s8LJ4BOcJhREiVDnRc3nM_Ktfe4F4duNuNyhYPWKeAKUOMZj97V7fdCFpv3wj057KgdLqgN AIus7Rs7a7ePgeoHg8pVbDluhjUz8lD3T0iF5kk5ew8UY9vrLxL_Zw2BFOdBpyJRbYvTFOe0GHj. 3J60PQhePe8I5UgZ5WwyfMV.ny5QIKRsvaQUGU3EQjooLPNX9ocm8uOd_aD4d7nAiu6BJdziyOY0 vQWcxh8HeQrWMMUXECOM7nWmnhUvp0Yt6tyGuWqLrYLgwV126KuUHx80MpPdp_zvKsaJ8aLNq6I5 kMAoSbnSu0uq6zxGCClteZXYwizmSW_hvHS_AmEf8cYibMNQLN6fjj6rgEyfl4uEIvjpDevtn1lo 1aksLbfUBXKGfbo9sdA5r.6yBqWE0zhpFDzMFY2KvvW61v5ZUpHwAqA3rUQ4Ze6SsQyysMJviXIe aeaxyt72xNAEMKA7FigEVll2kI0ejT0Ue1QYnc5JXQZhaZIXnEvjJK9UWDJyFJU8o_xeknnwL8V6 U1qZAhBzhAGqOac5Xjh6n8tA_lrwEUMla9TEOy6GTRpKE8kvo9Ze3kowsF.dL_Z2Dbh6Qffr5Xk5 K6BC5KRdGzwJ5M4fRNO0bkpfk3EonmIPTKkUoDGt7d2r8g4FmR3OLlV36SemfjWXwQfmdNpWu7cU FmUb_.QmiimaVe9SOgKKDJy.lH_dhRqPWG.sNiNk1gEGU8BWjBoNaghB6ITejrmCrKfrfGrmH7Sv HbTpQQN9z8iR20KSTEEr_Y6Jmxs.NETkEiMwn.qw2oS26Zf5aqb0cz.f0Skjcezh4Z_Ot.VuLR_7 JT3epXHJhRZa4CZyTE3rEXEPQH4d2z9.vXGVZQSDm07mI.TrsESDo3YWsjcX.wmo0VAsi5Xwxw3x 2iHz4uv_QmQItF3gVe4XfYsd6Sm.AK3dNvp9V3fYAsYPJhO0akfBXe1hdyDf2rTg0kLRG3sfjY5o JQnuOtGISdj2f7X2Q2gOLl.4ab2KvOT_Ej.0ohuN5cRssD_tBY3o7VlgwW517hornfdH6clnPmy. a._HQ3tRvZIoTyPEQpSIEML8Z38LfnRtctLtDrJutYHPzjbHKTwAeo8Lj6KSgdJ9InH5iXEheM22 7.burGLXzKRpbDKnx2IT_NTbyvGwNdS6VTyP01K9rvSgUD_gU6fTIRUd_vcDun7x15K185jUakRv fLoKVmsmetiwE50s.e8h7q6rWAsYhL3stv9krvpIP.kWNrL0wEGCf9oB22rTZrKUbwRe4p5SVqLz POvij4Sfq6OQ1ByiTQ.dhlh1BsEvigO.S7q5GPo9.KYk4Pzu_76L0_hoDc69rN193wJnJ5AKf2A7 QtP_3cA6.V5Vy49UpZf7wPnwJliUaPrvfMjLoxBS3U._Kw03S8PDxIcNbuMegfrqlceNXOkZyNq6 7WcdrNBVwSPxCc._dN2QaTItTsgeIKP5kigmmtnsKlKYRPqB69IK0zo4n4anYtxwKqxAt_iBbCDG Tak5CzrorbS7D0mc.LCw9ffPqL27d7acpgrXkoXVDm2RbHSeDcDbslKQe6Iul7pwraOYgBjfUh9U rdnEKmkvv48oxjCi7JwRR0c6ldJFGXlqzzABuren.fS51uexVF85YMZF0yzW1J16a5YSrOMWp6vR SJo8jR7cry7zkJOkfsk5PIG.gT6KLbLFEcmYhg22acG51R1kJ9A.39_.GQf_DetUtRazGtX4- X-Sonic-MF: Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic311.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with HTTP; Sat, 29 May 2021 08:15:41 +0000 Received: by kubenode550.mail-prod1.omega.bf1.yahoo.com (VZM Hermes SMTP Server) with ESMTPA ID 6cc552a86c5688d6360502b8cdeeca05; Sat, 29 May 2021 08:15:37 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-current List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.80.0.2.43\)) Subject: Re: I got a panic for "nvme0: cpl does not map to outstanding cmd" on a MACHIATObin Double Shot In-Reply-To: <90A23579-61B7-4619-AFD7-68439FCC16F3@yahoo.com> Date: Sat, 29 May 2021 01:15:34 -0700 Cc: freebsd-current , freebsd-arm Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <063D5E36-126F-497C-97AF-827BADC1ED2F.ref@yahoo.com> <063D5E36-126F-497C-97AF-827BADC1ED2F@yahoo.com> <90A23579-61B7-4619-AFD7-68439FCC16F3@yahoo.com> To: Warner Losh X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.80.0.2.43) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FsZB72SMqz4RH9 X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=yahoo.com header.s=s2048 header.b=qkL68s7N; dmarc=pass (policy=reject) header.from=yahoo.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of marklmi@yahoo.com designates 98.137.65.204 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=marklmi@yahoo.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.50 / 15.00]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[yahoo.com]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ptr:yahoo.com]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[yahoo.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[yahoo.com,reject]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[yahoo.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:36647, ipnet:98.137.64.0/20, country:US]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[98.137.65.204:from]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[yahoo.com:dkim]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[yahoo.com:s=s2048]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(1.00)[1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[98.137.65.204:from:127.0.2.255]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[98.137.65.204:from]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[98.137.65.204:from]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-current] Reply-To: marklmi@yahoo.com From: Mark Millard via freebsd-current X-Original-From: Mark Millard X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N On 2021-May-23, at 00:46, Mark Millard via freebsd-current = wrote: > On 2021-May-23, at 00:08, Mark Millard via freebsd-current = wrote: >=20 >> On 2021-May-22, at 22:16, Warner Losh wrote: >>=20 >>> On Sat, May 22, 2021 at 10:44 PM Mark Millard via freebsd-arm = wrote: >>> # mount -onoatime 192.168.1.187:/usr/ports/ /mnt/ >>> # diff -r /usr/ports/ /mnt/ | more >>> nvme0: cpl does not map to outstanding cmd >>> cdw0:00000000 sqhd:0020 sqid:0003 cid:007e p:1 sc:00 sct:0 m:0 dnr:0 >>> panic: received completion for unknown cmd >>>=20 >>> cid 0x7e has no currently active command. The cid is used by the = driver >>> to map completions back to requests. >>>=20 >>> So, there's usually 3 possibilities that I've seen this with. >>>=20 >>> (1) There's a missing cache flush so you get a bogus cpl back = because something stale >>> was read. It's unlikely to be this one because the rest of this look = like a successful >>> command completed: sc =3D 0 is successful completion and sct is a = generic command queued. >>>=20 >>> (2) We're looking at the completion record twice because we failed = to properly update the >>> head pointer and we've already completed the command. I've only ever = seen this in a >>> panic situation where we interrupt the completion routine because = something else >>> paniced. >>>=20 >>> (3) There's something that's corrupting the act_tr array in the = qpair. I've not seen this, >>> but if something else smashes that area (zeroing it in this case), = then that could cause >>> an error like this. >>=20 >> Of note may be that I buildworld and buildkernel with extra >> tuning enabled, targeting the cortex-a72. In one past example >> this lead to finding a missing synchronization related to XHCI >> handling that was fixed. (The fix was not aarch64 specific at >> all.) For that: A cortex-a53 did not show the problem with or >> without that tuning. A cortex-a72 showed the problem only with >> the cortex-a72 tuning, not with targeting a cortex-a53 tuning >> or generic armv7, for example. >>=20 >> Not that I've any evidence specifically suggesting such would >> be involved here. But it might be good to keep in mind as a >> possaibility. >>=20 >>> Or it could be something new I've not seen nor thought about before. >>>=20 >>> cpuid =3D 3 >>> time =3D 1621743752 >>> KDB: stack backtrace: >>> db_trace_self() at db_trace_self >>> db_trace_self_wrapper() at db_trace_self_wrapper+0x30 >>> vpanic() at vpanic+0x188 >>> panic() at panic+0x44 >>> nvme_qpair_process_completions() at = nvme_qpair_process_completions+0x1fc >>> nvme_timeout() at nvme_timeout+0x3c >>> softclock_call_cc() at softclock_call_cc+0x124 >>> softclock() at softclock+0x60 >>> ithread_loop() at ithread_loop+0x2a8 >>> fork_exit() at fork_exit+0x74 >>> fork_trampoline() at fork_trampoline+0x14 >>> KDB: enter: panic >>> [ thread pid 12 tid 100028 ] >>> Stopped at kdb_enter+0x48: undefined f904411f >>> db>=20 >>>=20 >>> Based on the "nvme" references, I expect this is tied to >>> handling the Optane 480 GiByte that is in the PCIe slot >>> and is the boot/only media for the machine doing the diff. >>>=20 >>> "db> dump" seems to have worked. >>>=20 >>> After the reboot, zpool scrub found no errors. >>>=20 >>> For reference: >>>=20 >>> # uname -apKU >>> FreeBSD CA72_16Gp_ZFS 14.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 14.0-CURRENT #1 = main-n246854-03b0505b8fe8-dirty: Sat May 22 16:25:04 PDT 2021 = root@CA72_16Gp_ZFS:/usr/obj/BUILDs/main-CA72-dbg-clang/usr/main-src/arm64.= aarch64/sys/GENERIC-DBG-CA72 arm64 aarch64 1400013 1400013 >>>=20 >>> If you have the dump, I suggest starting to make sure that the = act_tr array looks sane. Make >>> sure all the live pointers point to a sane looking tr. Make sure = that tr is on the active list, etc >>>=20 >>> It will take a fair amount of driver reading, though, to see how we = got here. I'd also check to >>> make sure that qpair->num_enttries > cpl.cid (0x3e in this case). >>>=20 >>=20 >> Okay. I got this while trying to test an odd diff -r over NFS >> issue with the more recent software. So the two will potentially >> compete for time. >>=20 >> As investigation will be exploratory for me, not familiar, I'll >> probably publish periodic notes on things as I go along looking >> at stuff. >>=20 >> My first is that the /var/crash/core.txt.0 has a gdb backtrace: >>=20 >> . . . >> #10 0xffff00000047900c in panic ( >> fmt=3D0x12 ) >> at /usr/main-src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:843 >> #11 0xffff0000002226b4 in nvme_qpair_process_completions ( >> qpair=3Dqpair@entry=3D0xffffa00008724300) >> at /usr/main-src/sys/dev/nvme/nvme_qpair.c:617 >> #12 0xffff000000223354 in nvme_timeout = (arg=3Darg@entry=3D0xffffa0000b053980) >> at /usr/main-src/sys/dev/nvme/nvme_qpair.c:938 >> #13 0xffff000000495bf8 in softclock_call_cc (c=3D0xffffa0000b0539a0,=20= >> cc=3Dcc@entry=3D0xffff000000de3500 , direct=3D0) >> at /usr/main-src/sys/kern/kern_timeout.c:696 >> #14 0xffff000000495fb0 in softclock (arg=3D0xffff000000de3500 = ) >> at /usr/main-src/sys/kern/kern_timeout.c:816 >> #15 0xffff0000004356dc in intr_event_execute_handlers (p=3D,=20 >> ie=3D0xffffa000058bc700) at /usr/main-src/sys/kern/kern_intr.c:1168 >> #16 ithread_execute_handlers (p=3D, = ie=3D0xffffa000058bc700) >> at /usr/main-src/sys/kern/kern_intr.c:1181 >> #17 ithread_loop (arg=3D, = arg@entry=3D0xffffa000058aef60) >> at /usr/main-src/sys/kern/kern_intr.c:1269 >> #18 0xffff000000431f6c in fork_exit ( >> callout=3D0xffff000000435430 , = arg=3D0xffffa000058aef60,=20 >> frame=3D0xffff0000eb7cc990) at = /usr/main-src/sys/kern/kern_fork.c:1083 >> #19 >>=20 >> So via kgdb . . . >>=20 >> (kgdb) up 11 >> #11 0xffff0000002226b4 in nvme_qpair_process_completions = (qpair=3Dqpair@entry=3D0xffffa00008724300) at = /usr/main-src/sys/dev/nvme/nvme_qpair.c:617 >> 617 KASSERT(0, ("received completion for = unknown cmd")); >>=20 >> (kgdb) print/x cpl.cid >> $4 =3D 0x7e >> (kgdb) print/x qpair->num_entries >> $5 =3D 0x100 >>=20 >> Based on also seeing the code: >>=20 >> qpair->act_tr =3D malloc_domainset(sizeof(struct nvme_tracker = *) * >> qpair->num_entries, M_NVME, DOMAINSET_PREF(qpair->domain), >> M_ZERO | M_WAITOK); >>=20 >> (kgdb) print qpair->act_tr >> $6 =3D (struct nvme_tracker **) 0xffffa00008725800 >> (kgdb) x/256g 0xffffa00008725800 >> 0xffffa00008725800: 0x0000000000000000 0x0000000000000000 >> 0xffffa00008725810: 0x0000000000000000 0x0000000000000000 >> . . . >> 0xffffa00008725fe0: 0x0000000000000000 0x0000000000000000 >> 0xffffa00008725ff0: 0x0000000000000000 0x0000000000000000 >>=20 >> It was all zeros (null pointers). No "live" pointers and, so, >> no tr's to inspect. >>=20 >> As none of this is familiar context beyond general programming >> concepts, it may be some time before I find anything else >> potentially of interest to report. If you have other specific >> things you would like me to look at, let me know. >>=20 >=20 > A fairly obvious thing I should have provided: >=20 > (kgdb) print/x *qpair > $15 =3D {ctrlr =3D 0xffff0000fe154000, id =3D 0x3, domain =3D 0x0, cpu = =3D 0x2, vector =3D 0x3, rid =3D 0x4, res =3D 0xffffa000086ded80, tag =3D = 0xffffa0000877b780, num_entries =3D 0x100, num_trackers =3D 0x80,=20 > sq_tdbl_off =3D 0x1018, cq_hdbl_off =3D 0x101c, phase =3D 0x1, = sq_head =3D 0x1f, sq_tail =3D 0x20, cq_head =3D 0x20, num_cmds =3D = 0x420, num_intr_handler_calls =3D 0xe66c, num_retries =3D 0x0, = num_failures =3D 0x0,=20 > cmd =3D 0xffff000100ebb000, cpl =3D 0xffff000100ebf000, dma_tag =3D = 0xffffa0000b093e00, dma_tag_payload =3D 0xffffa000059ef000, queuemem_map = =3D 0xffffa00005a07700, cmd_bus_addr =3D 0xacbb000,=20 > cpl_bus_addr =3D 0xacbf000, free_tr =3D {tqh_first =3D = 0xffffa0000b053a80, tqh_last =3D 0xffffa0000869da80}, outstanding_tr =3D = {tqh_first =3D 0xffffa0000b053980, tqh_last =3D 0xffffa0000b053980}, = queued_req =3D { > stqh_first =3D 0x0, stqh_last =3D 0xffffa000087243c8}, act_tr =3D = 0xffffa00008725800, is_enabled =3D 0x1, lock =3D {lock_object =3D = {lo_name =3D 0xffff00000090321f, lo_flags =3D 0x1030000, lo_data =3D = 0x0,=20 > lo_witness =3D 0xffffa0043fd96080}, mtx_lock =3D 0x0}} >=20 > Looks like I need to boot into the non-debug builds for the > other problem I'm testing for repeatability after a commit. I've no figured out anything interesting so far. But I've run into something that looks odd to me (not that I've any evidence it is related to the panic, more likely my ignorance): There is a use of atomic_store_rel_int(&qpair->cq_head, 0) for which I do not find any matching atomic_load_acq_int use (or other explicit _acq), so so there is no "synchronizes with" status in the code to establish an ordering across threads that involves the atomic_store_rel_int that I've found, just implicit/default relaxed-load-operations. A grep for "cq_head" under dev/nvme/ shows only: ./dev/nvme/nvme_private.h: uint32_t cq_head; ./dev/nvme/nvme_sysctl.c: SYSCTL_ADD_UINT(ctrlr_ctx, que_list, = OID_AUTO, "cq_head", ./dev/nvme/nvme_sysctl.c: CTLFLAG_RD, &qpair->cq_head, 0, ./dev/nvme/nvme_qpair.c: * below, but before we can reset = cq_head to zero at 2. Also cope with ./dev/nvme/nvme_qpair.c: if (qpair->cq_head =3D=3D = qpair->num_entries) { ./dev/nvme/nvme_qpair.c: * Here we know that we = need to zero cq_head and then negate ./dev/nvme/nvme_qpair.c: * the phase, which = hasn't been assigned if cq_head isn't ./dev/nvme/nvme_qpair.c: qpair->cq_head =3D 0; ./dev/nvme/nvme_qpair.c: } else if (qpair->cq_head =3D=3D = 0) { ./dev/nvme/nvme_qpair.c: cpl =3D = qpair->cpl[qpair->cq_head]; ./dev/nvme/nvme_qpair.c: * qpair->cq_head at 1 = below. Later, we re-enter this ./dev/nvme/nvme_qpair.c: * won't have updated = cq_head. Rather than panic again, ./dev/nvme/nvme_qpair.c: = nvme_dump_completion(&qpair->cpl[qpair->cq_head]); ./dev/nvme/nvme_qpair.c: if (++qpair->cq_head =3D=3D = qpair->num_entries) { /* 1 */ ./dev/nvme/nvme_qpair.c: = atomic_store_rel_int(&qpair->cq_head, 0); /* 2 */ ./dev/nvme/nvme_qpair.c: qpair->cq_hdbl_off, = qpair->cq_head); ./dev/nvme/nvme_qpair.c: qpair->sq_head =3D qpair->sq_tail =3D = qpair->cq_head =3D 0; (2 lines above the last has the atomic_store_rel_int use.) atomic_thread_fence_rel use would have "synchronizes with" based on ordinary loads reading something stored after the atomic_thread_fence_rel. Such is documented in "man atomic". But that is not what this code is doing. "man atomic" does not mention ordinary loads getting such a status by reading what an atomic_store_rel_int wrote. It does reference the atomic_thread_fence_rel related status for ordinary loads. So I'm clueless about what is intended to be going on relative to that "atomic_store_rel_int(&qpair->cq_head, 0)". Overall, the code does not appear to me to match up with the aarch64, powerpc64, or powerpc code generation requirements to have any matching "synchronizes with" relationships. (I'll not list machine instruction sequences here. I'd have to look up the detailed sequences. But, as I remember, more than a load is involved in the code sequences for the acquire side on these types of processors. Nothing in the source indicates to generate the additional code as far as I can tell.) =3D=3D=3D Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away in early 2018-Mar) From nobody Sat May 29 08:25:41 2021 X-Original-To: current@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1BB1C7C2F9 for ; Sat, 29 May 2021 08:25:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from filippomore@yahoo.com) Received: from sonic306-20.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com (sonic306-20.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com [66.163.189.82]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FsZPj121rz4T6r for ; Sat, 29 May 2021 08:25:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from filippomore@yahoo.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1622276742; bh=ah39cNWnT5fPrs52Kr/6iH9lWhn7UGaJuCQlE32iUrU=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:From:Subject:Reply-To; b=EaLz0VJCx9YOhviJBmZYLJOQALq7pLSFB+zuULswok6PpPS899kyASGiYsUu8gTD+3KMsnLVCKvtJyOZUpGGpORHV8NwIQ0+YN+jzvIORFSxWOCEF/RY4ER5mD5PDK2Jt6QTFnD00N0KFm1Y1Ct7D7u6qIe4bT7SGWiJBvFb7fUcK6jbRweNr9mW4GoC0lY5G9wDYf0ESXT3HCN+gWPS4nXMYmBqfgjTzjVxkFNjG9MyEQFggV6xsEHjPItSP12UGWBEQN8SThFkWrJOsk0ZtZBlHhV3/OhFYYINXKjlgKoESamhb1q1zaLakWRQkCEclBsMjnqLvEtc4xCRSvP3pg== X-SONIC-DKIM-SIGN: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1622276742; bh=rOillNUEN/VEh/gQzBoJHPEaTxc0xSD3g08UzSqKD9x=; h=X-Sonic-MF:Date:From:To:Subject:From:Subject; b=M3b4fu/nyQdaG2/7ZWkU/KmxerP5388IEU58MbJMomCpF5KFchds1zXFoenSO2vHOpVZTkIb3oTaZMPXu5gsX2f60lbQhvUdZmu0N5bsr9WfjVnB3WMsJxrOB2as47ejoVCdbMYwYPHILDYZJwpec8NCMR2yFff+1JnkvPm3d3LAYWWMHdv9H8Kdd4PnJX8WNmGvvbQnc9iZGfQJpogge5U6IKTsT6FAE0bI5lvTOWE58/CPTqHdW8gEU+Yt38QlAzfz9PHbLSClMdNQy2AdvXN6if49le6GHIcKn/PhRuGP8sweSnSvBW5S6f/fZdHRDHxhVWp9pStlKE1LSIat7A== X-YMail-OSG: rxNsM40VM1nM05D9TRn2D89DJkfqWT5yLL9pZL3Tr3O3_0ZmxJ4abogXItz_AUG wXZ_cnuNBsLsJ9qh.UoU15gQyVGnPPvR75EIdEcJLFlOpTe_lCX2cf0FYZf0OzVOvELhVC4ON786 P4LUXgWShzRxt5VWtuDXinW4N4wX6_.Y9RJcBf3vj2TSfT8NloznTtcFYnSYMtcX3SH_75sZCDVQ VZ.q0nQlONfbmFNsCtAC05mgn2dNU8gWr.KsHQvhMJViBHWR1izOTmbk6k5j.ovDFyTN759K1Ll8 MyKtUKmYhMd.1fDWvE40qCQikwy_cd13Ip_ReTxtAoDsY5FRQtZPV5V3_tsKwdiKK4gAZM3ay2rZ NAHojmAOXojT6sjJ9WT3ZoxHuH.W8mnJG.ERURdM2khsRV3KdYR5gICPTkwySDQbxj2b57tLJjP7 krS5AAivVoOkQlrkvwLtJ0J0kQbKyZoBDecZvo40_6Fm.5n4jl.pfABqrxRybSi2PkMB3.j0o4ss E._Oo1roZhT58s548iyFo3xdaS3ZrHOpKcxD1i3Sjk9QB.15yvRXDNWFfctkNlVsnW.Pxon8b9w4 4dGDk1W1uwlEyHOEL2MndBBx2eDfH70sKcjnSgbVnALK4Sjjh5wav5A18fi1waKEyAAtVNaey2eQ khj1Mh_UYHYGJ2gklCt9DrbvHVxyWnBbo.PaRQi.znlnYlqtohmwJhsNmcufA407EpN5XoEeJlPo gPV9P9lVDimr2OIzpDn28rN8rWKtKNIRCkcVvV7T4IcogpFmTnebQOsPauqwO58XUvqBZXcmFg.v nvmi4tFvdApJq8aZnpdFHfi6XSVb6b4PD4kPb3Nlk0QfJ1pP3CWeugT5sV_GBx7IkBetU72eO1RY 1u3yevEr9ZXv1BLCq5uyB8dusqbZUGBH4K6J7BpB2SCYt2Lq_ParUe1mQAS1_F4tS3C4mH9pMqBb RjMrEp0eqIfJp3dSDYhCmD_9q9m4ZC0x7gSptlRbj_XCWKIrA0m4laQsNYxMSU0rUBTxkW72JO62 UseFNzkqPU11RAxQCXHZURrNxjyMK2mWl6FnPXjfcHRDjwPL9rs8y1DncXsdXbfXmy2DYtkGwM2C tO5i3UijLM8ZXy8n2T50Z48AxGwsidYdujpRpGzod47vW11cJ5V3KQNxVA_COrZJdzBdFZSRXoGZ qP52N4xzBRqhpnv1vSReBpoz1yBJKkyXCPhTp7glx8hJMnM7lLRRcCYdfZzKxCSdz6SOy2D222uv L9.4TRX8RHuogdFlNmslDqxSqy0Tg5MKIc7u852pJrF5mf6YjXPYoBmkYmIXNMkpX1Z6QUhBbN3z JQRqqMa0LQrhEn2c.kMU27OXidMow0_rBc2P.tEdpUR3grQtL5HgUiZW4V2F5qZ9reEp_Wn84W.n IlPiGYIFIFHpP7kFCH1H4K3ayC_R4oITn7__pkNGkKRKMy_0MSoWihwQCR1b_MWSuR9BlPCKRq7q x_l2m_EObVxMxsJJXLbSw1.Wre51esOrJcTmf3_BOao4.A7peSTFmQvT_eA0ZJ3iFhW_OM9rFmvJ F7kfnbw0v2URFZy7AjbL8re9RGf7qP01it2oeQjjFejnyE_3tPdEC2Bjt.0JNI81rYGmT7HDPZp2 kpXA_MG4ZZ5oQUedTaS9aLc5IvbTjB9NK9s..PUdtezVOGkqQaXraIiaktLRPfP4sy0n8qLtNhe2 pqrguFG39YK7sOG3AEgnpUa6JxSyC0ohZpvKarzJ6jpmtgIHDyGLTriiIGy3U4YBeJtb1U5tnsiy mzCzu.vSkFnKa.XfOm_B.4Ev19Q6u7.W0IHywbxiNlZcYr_hAutGQQDbWADDm.2odA4aAm0nlkLV NZZWapp6LK0VIs896l5ZACdSFc08lUvgKE5BmpiZjDWTvct0KKqhPd3.WVb8JB8gsIp9OxCsGEue aI9b_5peYHwYhHLOTi9JpJ4XgzsuUSqrFdd1putBBvpVCIH1k7xT0Fq4MI9hkjyfAsnr.48bIaoK A8wZTYMFjXxjwJkuDJl_wwPxKRufQFJI72NmIu18jfHF.oOXhDn_y12G.9MgdqmTZRDr1yggniX_ lXzGxLEqX9vVlN8hLFR73qSD4dNw6rAoFYw3UWbNdlJ3bj_y7XutlbioyvY0ni6JTShWzqQ5Nnpf J4sfxHvAaC3MXlI8jswEU4D51N..GUo7ql3OYQV9JINZUFLt.jlOO90ShGXAkTbo9j1Jxa9ePZTu 0LgXwi5CRCHZaz2NCJL9cWrlGopujCGjIf20y7iAKZ8OjlvSAxJSj4Be7Yj3tZVY9RR03c3n5iTg dKJykoNIY.oz7MRkKfKcHAGnLweUlS.3JF_ChBtK3_evMOYjfx5goZiBlN5EjKZfbPhO_Q26B8SO PH.FM X-Sonic-MF: Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic306.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with HTTP; Sat, 29 May 2021 08:25:42 +0000 Date: Sat, 29 May 2021 08:25:41 +0000 (UTC) To: FreeBSD Current Message-ID: <1156078884.1465271.1622276741796@mail.yahoo.com> Subject: Problem compiling world List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-current List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_1465270_147087934.1622276741795" References: <1156078884.1465271.1622276741796.ref@mail.yahoo.com> X-Mailer: WebService/1.1.18368 YMailNorrin X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FsZPj121rz4T6r X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=yahoo.com header.s=s2048 header.b=EaLz0VJC; dmarc=pass (policy=reject) header.from=yahoo.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of filippomore@yahoo.com designates 66.163.189.82 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=filippomore@yahoo.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.00 / 15.00]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[yahoo.com]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ptr:yahoo.com]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[yahoo.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[yahoo.com,reject]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[yahoo.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:36646, ipnet:66.163.184.0/21, country:US]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[66.163.189.82:from]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[yahoo.com:dkim]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[yahoo.com:s=s2048]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(1.00)[1.000]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[66.163.189.82:from:127.0.2.255]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[66.163.189.82:from]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[66.163.189.82:from]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[current] Reply-To: filippomore@yahoo.com From: Filippo Moretti via current X-Original-From: Filippo Moretti X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: Y ------=_Part_1465270_147087934.1622276741795 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I have the following error while compiling world:--- linux_genalloc.o ---In= file included from /usr/local/sys/modules/drm-current-kmod/linuxkpi/gplv2/= src /linux_genalloc.c:35:In file included from /usr/src/sys/compat/linuxkpi= /common/include/linux/interrup t.h:35:In file included from /usr/local/sys/= modules/drm-current-kmod/linuxkpi/gplv2/inc lude/linux/device.h:4:In file i= ncluded from /usr/src/sys/compat/linuxkpi/common/include/linux/device.h :36= :In file included from /usr/src/sys/compat/linuxkpi/common/include/linux/ko= bject. h:36:/usr/local/sys/modules/drm-current-kmod/linuxkpi/gplv2/include/= linux/kernel.h:12 :10: fatal error: 'linux/kconfig.h' file not found#includ= e ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--- linux_compat.o ---1 error generated.*** [linux_compa= t.o] Error code 1make[4]: stopped in /usr/local/sys/modules/drm-current-kmo= d/linuxkpimake[1]: stopped in /usr/srcmake: stopped in /usr/src[root@sting = /usr/src]#=C2=A0 FreeBSD sting 14.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 14.0-CURRENT #38 main-n246776-f17a590085= 0: Thu May 20 20:40:36 CEST 2021 root@sting:/usr/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/sy= s/STING amd64=C2=A0The error is repeatable and make cleandir did not solve = the problem.Filippo ------=_Part_1465270_147087934.1622276741795-- From nobody Sat May 29 08:31:29 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-current@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3322C7CF64 for ; Sat, 29 May 2021 08:31:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jakob@alvermark.net) Received: from out.alvermark.net (out.alvermark.net [185.34.136.138]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FsZXP3D77z4V9v for ; Sat, 29 May 2021 08:31:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jakob@alvermark.net) Received: from c-f649235c.06-431-73746f70.bbcust.telenor.se ([92.35.73.246] helo=mail.alvermark.net) by out.alvermark.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.91 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1lmuNX-000Bxy-E2 for freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Sat, 29 May 2021 10:31:31 +0200 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alvermark.net; s=x; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To: MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:References:To:Subject:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=7+YcC4K3Z+YQsxbr92FiMerDT3k6YBazZfgxPJeagzo=; b=Ocd+TbdkwvPWbFAmyVdOi7Vxrb YJ11fEkXclz9iGfH+p5SNCh/5B7ZlPbw1S2JFwlD4bHFWx7AWCRRGoht+Vxg+fQBVfwtryyacd/wj LveM4Frh0qw+wVt8uvoAbpwUiXp6tFSOGKBFKltvz5xEtnuHe3P3ihBc/Usu0rkxDhYqL+GYZVqFH wvLTByzyaJ88EQq4lFNXNhVCdxz1zRkX66INvZFdiHhG+z61vsgehRVTGXPsXBU679zJ8OM/sEmZo 40CijxmtzE9R3wT4UcAGIHs0w9ZdSB4KJVwzO+BkYe3r8VSSMBZODp1SReD09lB6dZp69YQYos4tY hTC+ekqA==; Received: from [192.168.67.27] by mail.alvermark.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.91 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1lmuNV-000NPg-Pb for freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Sat, 29 May 2021 10:31:29 +0200 Subject: Re: Build fails with Filesize limit exceeded To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org References: <49db89ac-a564-dd76-145b-b5f94abdc1ab@alvermark.net> From: Jakob Alvermark Message-ID: Date: Sat, 29 May 2021 10:31:29 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.2 List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-current List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FsZXP3D77z4V9v X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=alvermark.net header.s=x header.b=Ocd+Tbdk; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of jakob@alvermark.net designates 185.34.136.138 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=jakob@alvermark.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.50 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[alvermark.net:s=x]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:185.34.136.138]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[alvermark.net: no valid DMARC record]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[185.34.136.138:from:127.0.2.255]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(1.00)[1.000]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[alvermark.net:+]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[185.34.136.138:from]; ASN(0.00)[asn:34971, ipnet:185.34.136.0/23, country:IT]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-current] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N On 5/28/21 1:59 PM, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 01:11:06PM +0200, Jakob Alvermark wrote: >> Hi, >> >> >> Building -current fails like this: >> >> --- kerberos5/lib/libasn1__L --- >> Building >> /usr/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/kerberos5/lib/libasn1/asn1_kx509_asn1.x >> Building >> /usr/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/kerberos5/lib/libasn1/asn1_rfc2459_asn1.c >> Building /usr/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/kerberos5/lib/libasn1/rfc2459_asn1.h >> Building >> /usr/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/kerberos5/lib/libasn1/rfc2459_asn1-priv.h >> --- rfc2459_asn1-priv.h --- >> Filesize limit exceeded >> *** [rfc2459_asn1-priv.h] Error code 153 >> make[4]: *** rfc2459_asn1-priv.h removed >> >> make[4]: stopped in /usr/src/kerberos5/lib/libasn1 >> .ERROR_TARGET='rfc2459_asn1-priv.h' >> .ERROR_META_FILE='/usr/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/kerberos5/lib/libasn1/rfc2459_asn1-priv.h.meta' >> .MAKE.LEVEL='4' >> MAKEFILE='' >> .MAKE.MODE='meta missing-filemon=yes missing-meta=yes silent=yes verbose' >> _ERROR_CMD='cp -f rfc2459_asn1-priv.hx rfc2459_asn1-priv.h;' >> .CURDIR='/usr/src/kerberos5/lib/libasn1' >> .MAKE='make' >> .OBJDIR='/usr/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/kerberos5/lib/libasn1' >> .TARGETS='all' >> DESTDIR='/usr/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/tmp' >> LD_LIBRARY_PATH='' >> MACHINE='amd64' >> MACHINE_ARCH='amd64' >> MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX='' >> MAKESYSPATH='/usr/src/share/mk' >> MAKE_VERSION='20210206' >> PATH='/usr/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/tmp/bin:/usr/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/tmp/usr/sbin:/usr/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/tmp/usr/bin:/usr/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/tmp/legacy/usr/sbin:/usr/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/tmp/legacy/usr/bin:/usr/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/tmp/legacy/bin:/usr/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/tmp/legacy/usr/libexec::/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin' >> SRCTOP='/usr/src' >> OBJTOP='/usr/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64' >> >> make[2]: stopped in /usr/src >> >> make[1]: stopped in /usr/src >> >> make: stopped in /usr/src >> >> >> >> I have tried clearing /usr/obj and restarting the build. I does not help. >> >> I checked out c235059bb7e, which is what I'm currently running, but that's >> not building either, same error, which I find strange since I obviously >> build it before. >> >> What's going on here? > You need e71d5c7331700504e58cf1a35d. Build just a kernel from today sources, > install it and reboot. > Thanks, that fixed it! Jakob From nobody Sat May 29 10:34:12 2021 X-Original-To: current@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BC9FD7B24E for ; Sat, 29 May 2021 10:35:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hps@selasky.org) Received: from mail.turbocat.net (turbocat.net [IPv6:2a01:4f8:c17:6c4b::2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FsdHf0kF1z4dXM for ; Sat, 29 May 2021 10:35:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hps@selasky.org) Received: from hps2020.home.selasky.org (unknown [178.17.145.105]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.turbocat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A9152260102; Sat, 29 May 2021 12:35:33 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: Problem compiling world To: filippomore@yahoo.com, FreeBSD Current References: <1156078884.1465271.1622276741796.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <1156078884.1465271.1622276741796@mail.yahoo.com> From: Hans Petter Selasky Message-ID: Date: Sat, 29 May 2021 12:34:12 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.1 List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-current List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1156078884.1465271.1622276741796@mail.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FsdHf0kF1z4dXM X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N On 5/29/21 10:25 AM, Filippo Moretti via current wrote: > I have the following error while compiling world:--- linux_genalloc.o ---In file included from /usr/local/sys/modules/drm-current-kmod/linuxkpi/gplv2/src /linux_genalloc.c:35:In file included from /usr/src/sys/compat/linuxkpi/common/include/linux/interrup t.h:35:In file included from /usr/local/sys/modules/drm-current-kmod/linuxkpi/gplv2/inc lude/linux/device.h:4:In file included from /usr/src/sys/compat/linuxkpi/common/include/linux/device.h :36:In file included from /usr/src/sys/compat/linuxkpi/common/include/linux/kobject. h:36:/usr/local/sys/modules/drm-current-kmod/linuxkpi/gplv2/include/linux/kernel.h:12 :10: fatal error: 'linux/kconfig.h' file not found#include ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--- linux_compat.o ---1 error generated.*** [linux_compat.o] Error code 1make[4]: stopped in /usr/local/sys/modules/drm-current-kmod/linuxkpimake[1]: stopped in /usr/srcmake: stopped in /usr/src[root@sting /usr/src]# > > > > > FreeBSD sting 14.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 14.0-CURRENT #38 main-n246776-f17a5900850: Thu May 20 20:40:36 CEST 2021 root@sting:/usr/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/sys/STING amd64 The error is repeatable and make cleandir did not solve the problem.Filippo > Hi, Are you using the latest version of the drm-current-kmod from ports? --HPS From nobody Sat May 29 15:59:49 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-current@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72992BFA83F; Sat, 29 May 2021 15:59:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mj-mailinglist@gmx.de) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mout.gmx.net", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass Class 2 CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FsmTg4KHrz3kDy; Sat, 29 May 2021 15:59:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mj-mailinglist@gmx.de) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1622303989; bh=FIG5t7pq+3T9XrI2mfFjEWOJEGQJxc1t3FPm+QW1ZHs=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:From:To:Subject:Date; b=ZtkT6Q+rn1M7jTqvMyu4ndxq3/SGeIA3AE9AjaWN0/ec0dMZSZT07pF06sqVaFfGY RqT/YcLSbLkemqnT1sjnUAC8Ds3OaSrc6qtsC2cVNpHBfgZ/MCS119CZg9OeFt5q5M eJ5KcKmSrm3/ZcUs2L+AhtRguq1BW3ZwvmF9oAEk= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Received: from [89.245.246.156] ([89.245.246.156]) by web-mail.gmx.net (3c-app-gmx-bap59.server.lan [172.19.172.129]) (via HTTP); Sat, 29 May 2021 17:59:49 +0200 List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-current List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: From: mj-mailinglist@gmx.de To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Network in VNET jail does not work on my FreeBSD current bhyve vm Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Sat, 29 May 2021 17:59:49 +0200 Importance: normal Sensitivity: Normal X-Priority: 3 X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:bJOKm1w6Ra+jn5x/7CelHq7lVaNl3Z/2CmukUgLWNKv88o34CBL51VDkf/wa0exc72nOV 7k7eF5yAG/4TAIlkA9rHxyqxLdZW+LOM+TjV3TBBMLJOEqaitxieIFUwDuGBNFWRXPvP1KhtFhhy BfSRUM0p5cOSmBLn79QrlA32iW0nIje1N+gxVrAVqrCb5FeA5oKk22Oast6+pk5fe/RGBRw3PvfI c29PlM3zjGcKzTRuxsQkBqERcRqzwS22T33J5Ep5gwflk13Gcg9NhMywpWJkTXAUy5t4awh/wJJB sw= X-Spam-Flag: NO X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:BMr66DBcBak=:g9pzPIjHmd0pPpBStdgPoV /4LvXG7NPmfVx9DoDX7WT0oHb6i2xgAS/PclXSEhG+6KqYCsTzP9tqDUcsEm3wGN0YtLAZZbd L25CUijAN/pqTdpb+zbIOI6K00ukv+bVWEAVq3NTu510KQmM/QNHB2jFOiq9P6Is4AG6ybf16 gdyUAPg+BmM3Ec1oPRBQ/8chzvL1b961kl8AvmPA7bvxr+UEx6U81L0TFCEKifNVyxgMEiXHV 6xCrhG7AKOo/zUE3AOzGdA8f2XBxQ+7mVXSr1rMMPF/dy+j4nmd2sVCMMFyuLzSG3bAmaypL+ VrA9ed0fPWPjtxlnN6zeaPMj+YAtSNoa/efGISCu5NVsQ3a5VLmhJ5sjsibEDN1ORNRH5xQSW TTJ7DuOMGVjtdOzT9nsjJEWVBkKijn3FQ7e3SG7nn67tvkJ+43TMA2tgjP9zVCWJP/Z4R3JOp 0P53+j97C6afu/e3oYHH8CYEY5wi8KOB7Dj1ewVj+8VgTAiOv821rMbjK9nXBB4Ed+p05AeQZ ZlkACKKQCxIECUmwIe3ppfrzKWBWofseL24Jg+/fzWhSR6tjS13XIz4qlh77C8NVrl/ex1mXH hcFfwNN0yBV2qWJ+MCD1PEzI/QYyR0Uy86MIRy57QdcWjwWaVQsDzEPv3sf987xwQEi3Csijj zCAuJHYKp1zltoH1TodMVgshaGha6FqOy39GOT5NIOQbXftmoXEafmn6lkvTdTq670R57wsUZ GImK+ZKXD1vDccdnsF30dbpEyvAXDW/28Woj9REJsEPpDjo0WbpiTDsXL5gpS8+KGCUYNGeRC CqdhYule42q/1iSVjd3qrxDLtLeUw67LiqCoAoGnQd+cxOQAPs/+peNtvH6iC3h5cEgnmRTZz j9tgBq5L2tTZaKRjrLmxE3nMXBBwB6vsJu8uMSNkFL7ilXm3BlbYimo7pMpXzWn+jhrlb6Usa HseLyqgrw5Q== X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FsmTg4KHrz3kDy X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmx.net header.s=badeba3b8450 header.b=ZtkT6Q+r; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmx.de; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of mj-mailinglist@gmx.de designates 212.227.17.21 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=mj-mailinglist@gmx.de X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.60 / 15.00]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmx.de]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:212.227.17.0/27]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmx.net:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; HAS_X_PRIO_THREE(0.00)[3]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmx.de,none]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[89.245.246.156:received]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmx.de]; ASN(0.00)[asn:8560, ipnet:212.227.0.0/16, country:DE]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmx.net:s=badeba3b8450]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[212.227.17.21:from]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; FROM_NO_DN(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_VERYGOOD(0.00)[212.227.17.21:from]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-current,freebsd-jail] X-Spam: Yes X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N Hello everybody, since a few weeks, my jails on a bhyve-vm, running current are not reachable via network, when configured with VNET. They can't even access the gateway. I don't remember when this problem started, but it's a few weeks. The same jail.conf works on a 13.0 host, on a current system the network does not work. A configuration without VNET on the same jail works. Are there any changes, that i missed? Here is the configuration, maybe someone spots an error, or has an idea what's going on: -- Martin uname on bhyve vm: ------------------ root@fbsd14:~ # uname -a FreeBSD fbsd14.fritz.box 14.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 14.0-CURRENT main-n247020-e0fa04e257c GENERIC-NODEBUG amd64 root@fbsd14:~ # freebsd-version -kru 14.0-CURRENT 14.0-CURRENT 14.0-CURRENT jail.conf on bhyve vm: ---------------------- # set default configuration values mount.devfs = true; exec.clean = true; allow.chflags = 1; allow.raw_sockets = 1; devfs_ruleset = 5; exec.system_user = "root"; exec.jail_user = "root"; exec.timeout = 30; stop.timeout = 30; ######### # Jails # ######### j1 { # Hostname host.hostname = "j1.fritz.box"; host.domainname = "fritz.box"; host.hostuuid = "68c2ad9b-b582-11eb-a925-589cfc0ac350"; osrelease = "14.0-CURRENT"; osreldate = "1400013"; # Network vnet = 1; vnet.interface = "epair2b"; exec.prestart += "ifconfig epair2 create up"; exec.prestart += "ifconfig epair2a description 'IFID=2 JAIL=j1'"; exec.prestart += "ifconfig bridge0 addm epair2a"; command = "ifconfig epair2b inet 192.168.1.101/22"; command += "route -n add -inet default 192.168.0.1"; exec.prestop = "ifconfig epair2b -vnet j1"; exec.poststop += "ifconfig bridge0 deletem epair2a"; exec.poststop += "ifconfig epair2a destroy"; sysvmsg = new; sysvsem = new; sysvshm = new; path = "/jails/j1"; allow.mount.zfs = 1; ## Script execution exec.timeout = 90; # Pre-/Post-Scripts exec.prestart += "logger trying to start jail j1 ..."; exec.poststart += "logger jail j1 has started"; exec.prestop += "logger shutting down jail j1"; exec.poststop += "logger jail j1 has shut down"; # Start Script exec.start = "/bin/sh /etc/rc"; exec.stop = "/bin/sh /etc/rc.shutdown"; } ----------------------------------- /etc/rc.conf on bhyve vm: ------------------------- syslogd_flags="-ss" sendmail_enable="NONE" hostname="fbsd14.fritz.box" ifconfig_vtnet0="inet 192.168.1.100 netmask 255.255.252.0" defaultrouter="192.168.0.1" local_unbound_enable="YES" sshd_enable="YES" ntpd_enable="YES" # Set dumpdev to "AUTO" to enable crash dumps, "NO" to disable dumpdev="AUTO" zfs_enable="YES" jail_enable="YES" keymap="de" cloned_interfaces="bridge0" ifconfig_bridge0="addm vtnet0 up" # NFS rpc_lockd_enable="YES" rpc_statd_enable="YES" nfs_client_enable="YES" nfsuserd_enable="YES" ------------------------------------- ifconfig on bhyve vm: --------------------- root@fbsd14:~ # ifconfig -f inet:cidr vtnet0: flags=8863 metric 0 mtu 1500 options=80028 ether 58:9c:fc:0a:c3:50 inet 192.168.1.100/22 broadcast 192.168.3.255 media: Ethernet autoselect (10Gbase-T ) status: active nd6 options=29 lo0: flags=8049 metric 0 mtu 16384 options=680003 inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x2 inet 127.0.0.1/8 groups: lo nd6 options=21 bridge0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 ether 58:9c:fc:10:ff:bf id 00:00:00:00:00:00 priority 32768 hellotime 2 fwddelay 15 maxage 20 holdcnt 6 proto rstp maxaddr 2000 timeout 1200 root id 00:00:00:00:00:00 priority 32768 ifcost 0 port 0 member: epair2a flags=143 ifmaxaddr 0 port 4 priority 128 path cost 2000 groups: bridge nd6 options=9 epair2a: flags=8943 metric 0 mtu 1500 description: IFID=2 JAIL=j1 options=8 ether 02:b4:ee:59:b3:0a groups: epair media: Ethernet 10Gbase-T (10Gbase-T ) status: active nd6 options=29 ------------------------------- /etc/rc.conf in jail: --------------------- syslogd_flags="-ss" sendmail_enable="NO" sendmail_submit_enable="NO" sendmail_outbound_enable="NO" sendmail_msp_queue_enable="NO" sshd_enable="YES" --------------------------- ifconfig in jail: ----------------- root@j1:~ # ifconfig -f inet:cidr lo0: flags=8049 metric 0 mtu 16384 options=680003 inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1 inet 127.0.0.1/8 groups: lo nd6 options=21 epair2b: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 options=8 ether 02:b4:ee:59:b3:0b inet 192.168.1.101/22 broadcast 192.168.3.255 groups: epair media: Ethernet 10Gbase-T (10Gbase-T ) status: active nd6 options=29 ------------------------------------ uname in jail: -------------- root@j1:~ # uname -a FreeBSD j1.fritz.box 14.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 14.0-CURRENT main-n247020-e0fa04e257c GENERIC-NODEBUG amd64 root@j1:~ # freebsd-version -ru 14.0-CURRENT 14.0-CURRENT From nobody Sat May 29 17:42:21 2021 X-Original-To: current@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA7C9C78569 for ; Sat, 29 May 2021 17:42:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from filippomore@yahoo.com) Received: from sonic305-21.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com (sonic305-21.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com [66.163.185.147]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Fspm23WbQz3tVV for ; Sat, 29 May 2021 17:42:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from filippomore@yahoo.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1622310144; bh=mBj6bv/+1fdaGwSRf+mCjMkYh0UgozehHMGz2wYOjOs=; h=Date:From:To:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From:Subject:Reply-To; b=KwDodKzV9yAwK/vfBo0v0XEQP24XHgNAoKaCftWQeMa3VxU93DuiJjj1o8Tzvcz94EGYuvL0X7fJ4rUfT43Q0PCC3WicVTaVUt3kFMnIMSh/UM+o332lG0b+XMpP0YljKQQcsPVzs28RD2kXc1bESfBQLVzD28po/BCF2e2J6mZSh1JCz8pcGqkJDZqgKYAIlNKnZukM07yTAAlbEoWh1sTG5kJn/zm6qxae0nWr6lqahhbWV+Xshmg6q2rb+Hz0I738rt4kFHT/yufRiGQlj7999FHYpt+hXeIAww+c5auJ0Hf2NvLtIQFRTCzz4atieX6cUR4V3MNAXqcpB8sUrA== X-SONIC-DKIM-SIGN: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1622310144; bh=oT8EVxCGI4VrcOMdPZlAcrqx6Ux8lCiGXhnANSog/jM=; h=X-Sonic-MF:Date:From:To:Subject:From:Subject; b=U35ClydFcmJ7oG5G0+ymcWdAcGWJbHtAIFqIYU9i1QUQronQ9Df+s6sdbMYq8mskdHdSN6AusOHQi5D5AsXhf7Tny1d1mgz9Ks+gujZbqvXTOWl6Dh5yj25HqPJ3vgndSOb4VAi4wiLmF+OnzYvS7AujzRU8ny8wmTYZPziFWYKySBCfs0H6pxZ8KWU3Jt7FDjQsmEoPoGlShKRCe4hxdv0tZd3Az86YpNDMj4bgEXqQzizNWGPow57G7ePYvpsWsNCV2B8z0Eb/W8qcNlP6s6KbpcDQqjye4MyiXqqWMNOieny4NLhDSQQbarQu765nsjyDnUTiMHMkvREQ3UASEQ== X-YMail-OSG: IYORJ34VM1nIbmh0XLetIUZWojuyTjJHkJL9Bd0vfD_xX4ouWIfui_xwl.7f5Lc 0KV5gsKz6_3dN.XEahKIRUx7Ck6G8dNBMvSeoj32Tl_cOlOyVOJNsrL_Y_KiNIJggBToaYnWhXR7 eROfTaTfIEsoLLJ62dMBapvyPpgHrW0zdsIEPms3RjiF.eZJT0jbPVfANo0twHMdNASqOd2HQ8qq QBgGqEkNMGKnABHYl2A91j3_qqBZtu1DfhYcMkyquEUDFhVwZEdoRNvNBStJa1cN4IJzD4cAOoXu pc8uR0V_sCkurF0BWOLj7aOrWp5gmhbew7hinwzbreuKRkhW_herY2gxvTXc_Kex19BTUkkwKkfB o9wFTZfDW3O_Wth0rUNHwoOVL67scdMzwqZj2ZogP6EQZz4qsz3BX2PUxWh8Ll5RU34BJKleKahp 9u1ud5tLUgpTGFU6qtVMiw03I_ZOg2MlIg5s5L8IsgmTi5PPB4r.3gHMQAqYFNaH3K6D8zcl8h8b uX6aSRLzyCld7siS792IjEyvCsmGL6i9PllMtELLazXsJ2vDslvLk8szi7V0NCujWmwHiLKncpmI E.lLWarf1lfXIHg0imNEd290CaMWRCcjBcZx_ZLzaY4Z.MX1.AJPktdizFmAJ5BkoUsG4kDaWPR1 MtAvXYkRWhg3XGWy6J2YralP08y.e9QKRG70bzXU_N_bX5MwXjWgm_ooIc1Uqtu.hD7kV733Kgww dHZG7r5RrwxmcJjyeo_w6ySz85nVdE9TGAHu513RztO1nI0LYTYmYW2XFtnASJ8tbr0DPv2CYHFh dXRCMdlcGBcNEWV2U4TxfL5u07XVMdyD85te5PwKcJ1W01R7H6Y.Peiauym.qoMxjYwaG_3prkyE s6b0zPCnMBOUkX3_J06zIvVf2Tf1UmNYq7fDIuFHG3uQn6RoRJp9C.4pcibfbMKFxrRRJKKt3QY6 sBQZmmJxMLdb1cDs8hVOP6x.agX.2lb3.fB2M0Zjgt.Z9NZHdGGKKuLYQFcFKGF4GUvNsFNJClJC 3UOH0AXuQw0g4o1kWR69aJ.QFrTlEorrabdkgZ4C7zrM11vuf7gX_fZICXVr2PN0In6a2HpxlzWz idZotEhdiP1oyKMiegG_7.ZaB.uA.0YQtnudbvg7.rACtX6zkZnxOxhxdjtWAn_2ekJC0IPke0wF mMNMZgExAIvz3xc_ofg2jHMksR5XdkteWw4ci6cyixYK8eXIZNvEUvmHAr8sEUKSquzE9ThReS6v bgNT2J1E8u5B6nGtcM4tH20nypkpZePKzweYz1yq3vAwYBPxwQ0LAsF8euY05MM0n9upBS_B2ocC NdnbYLK8MWqkWtel3yN7yFEt79Ytp131oUneWvVAD502U3BaGiJpIJb38QtI_ZAAZ_kYpMtSNb7u czTicpPWp21Da5OlTrIUjCHQyt7jeSPWzlw9..SX1c459HJ3icOs01Oi7ywGOf_dNx8LYM1zov2r oEn0OIhLTJK5ddJGrHEU87EuGnvIvBzVTVrurmNqEW2_ByWC5WzyYdFpeyZsFAvivFCQSi4q5pHE __dh427JW08.4jMk_6sh0L.7jhFwJ7KJHQC0VZ_Sb0wMcBs5OZPcAQTCZVPyX7WFMVJLulG1qCFS KXvrz5b120A3RgsPN1GoRAaVJPvDbwL0aRNL6x3jiLoRXEpwUAofuBx2dV2Q.06j1TtbjGBZ3TUz nskGieqc28RcCTPs50lZx8sJTmJrX9xxLSfkFp9J92FQ8rn7U_UqXzYuaH01dR9l4u0dLsxf4BpA bQ9Dzp6J41GBIly1rWgwmBdneab3XU9ubal4ZTot_Z_9FtBLz2ajR0E7y9utCyPGFi8tLUfEslXx w0PQIjm6mm_Dfx15PpXP3yWEIGCHLLMPQ7.pUOBaf1Nq5BdnLqrv.f_uJlGnSYC49NnumAlur9.t ZxGcK9L4y1eystc5dJOahYfi._Kqz3J_cZTguPy77vDbPXkVkA6Up1TwVlmAiuP_ZCvPwSFkMU3L wTbL2z1f4bUsw8BwwWQq4oeajwqyOko4aeiuv0ag1z60O.Bq2VbtYd7eJa1ZYGgTWRip9HwjTd5n 0PHMUzkKzab5GEM_3RK..1GsL.47rTG0JScEd4RUI9kOs4MXt5NISX1ui_YmgHmPRB6VLs.RvLyE fv1w5751oRLQ5ISou6ExlUf0h9xq9_.ZwraeEOE.Y3MI78FCrvzdtLzWkFjC8uV4I.9kcDjzChc. bteY0eLXvFIi3oKcx1aj0fWSuGSFb09DuymboeGYUbUzCos_o0wj.asqPFFSHg6.uLQN1DxjTqRL jv2PDco.aOq.iht9rBGLfz7W5wZ3J7N1IWqOYu0Wmum8sLLV8b935_.OO6zyOVhV_.7qxu3t6O47 _GBy6QxnQQIBuzl.BizhNw8_DdeodE6USytNten60hris0ybnGsBpAV4zYnFqlHKJIXCz4l3kgyS u03LWzT4e X-Sonic-MF: Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic305.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with HTTP; Sat, 29 May 2021 17:42:24 +0000 Date: Sat, 29 May 2021 17:42:21 +0000 (UTC) To: Hans Petter Selasky , FreeBSD Current Message-ID: <566922277.1553527.1622310141650@mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: References: <1156078884.1465271.1622276741796.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <1156078884.1465271.1622276741796@mail.yahoo.com> Subject: Re: Problem compiling world List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-current List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_1553526_145212816.1622310141649" X-Mailer: WebService/1.1.18368 YMailNorrin X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Fspm23WbQz3tVV X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[] Reply-To: filippomore@yahoo.com From: Filippo Moretti via current X-Original-From: Filippo Moretti X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: Y ------=_Part_1553526_145212816.1622310141649 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Yes I doFilippo On Saturday, May 29, 2021, 12:37:46 PM GMT+2, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: =20 =20 On 5/29/21 10:25 AM, Filippo Moretti via current wrote: > I have the following error while compiling world:--- linux_genalloc.o ---= In file included from /usr/local/sys/modules/drm-current-kmod/linuxkpi/gplv= 2/src /linux_genalloc.c:35:In file included from /usr/src/sys/compat/linuxk= pi/common/include/linux/interrup t.h:35:In file included from /usr/local/sy= s/modules/drm-current-kmod/linuxkpi/gplv2/inc lude/linux/device.h:4:In file= included from /usr/src/sys/compat/linuxkpi/common/include/linux/device.h := 36:In file included from /usr/src/sys/compat/linuxkpi/common/include/linux/= kobject. h:36:/usr/local/sys/modules/drm-current-kmod/linuxkpi/gplv2/includ= e/linux/kernel.h:12 :10: fatal error: 'linux/kconfig.h' file not found#incl= ude ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--- linux_compat.o ---1 error generated.*** [linux_com= pat.o] Error code 1make[4]: stopped in /usr/local/sys/modules/drm-current-k= mod/linuxkpimake[1]: stopped in /usr/srcmake: stopped in /usr/src[root@stin= g /usr/src]# >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > FreeBSD sting 14.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 14.0-CURRENT #38 main-n246776-f17a5900= 850: Thu May 20 20:40:36 CEST 2021 root@sting:/usr/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/= sys/STING amd64=C2=A0The error is repeatable and make cleandir did not solv= e the problem.Filippo >=20 Hi, Are you using the latest version of the drm-current-kmod from ports? --HPS =20 ------=_Part_1553526_145212816.1622310141649-- From nobody Sat May 29 18:30:28 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-current@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A203DC7A9EF for ; Sat, 29 May 2021 18:30:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from me@cameronkatri.com) Received: from cameronkatri.com (cameronkatri.com [206.189.178.249]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Fsqqc3KhYz4RR7 for ; Sat, 29 May 2021 18:30:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from me@cameronkatri.com) Received: from [192.168.1.186] (c-73-84-80-103.hsd1.fl.comcast.net [73.84.80.103]) by cameronkatri.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7CE13403C8 for ; Sat, 29 May 2021 14:30:29 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cameronkatri.com; s=20201109; t=1622313029; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to: references; bh=iqI3Aoz2L0Rib069gqCddsnJA0PHYc93IDyc9dbHHDQ=; b=ZoU0kRzKfdnZqon0n8gyxUTqvYGijrdwys97i4ay6/3aeou2RfPaEVslhj3UMGJrao15xQ LHGJ7prYFrSU+zSYbg8tHcxT3FVh9hoj9kBC+cUR0gKi1o/Zgl5d9+ZP8Ie+aeyh4E57of Wq2gJSdYvuAJ6lG0dRK2lcauyljRC3E= To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Better color support in diff(1) and ls(1) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 29 May 2021 14:30:28 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.2 List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-current List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Fsqqc3KhYz4RR7 X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=cameronkatri.com header.s=20201109 header.b=ZoU0kRzK; dmarc=pass (policy=reject) header.from=cameronkatri.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of me@cameronkatri.com designates 206.189.178.249 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=me@cameronkatri.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[cameronkatri.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[cameronkatri.com,reject]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[206.189.178.249:from]; ASN(0.00)[asn:14061, ipnet:206.189.176.0/20, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[73.84.80.103:received]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[cameronkatri.com:s=20201109]; FREEFALL_USER(0.00)[me]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-current@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[206.189.178.249:from:127.0.2.255]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-current] Reply-To: me@cameronkatri.com From: Cameron Katri via freebsd-current X-Original-From: Cameron Katri X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N Hello,     I just submitted two differentials, D30545 and D30547, for color support in diff(1) and underline support in ls(1) respectively. While I was submitting these I also noticed that .arcconfig is still configured to submit differentials to the subversion repo, not the git one. - Cameron Katri From nobody Sat May 29 20:25:04 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-current@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7964FEA8237 for ; Sat, 29 May 2021 20:25:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marklmi@yahoo.com) Received: from sonic301-22.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (sonic301-22.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com [98.137.64.148]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FstMr6Gn0z4YRH for ; Sat, 29 May 2021 20:25:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marklmi@yahoo.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1622319910; bh=p4aggnXXG4H/PoBO3Vypui1Uh04jeJJyUGWSIMbSzFo=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To:From:Subject:Reply-To; b=iokO3iQsQv6cFWFiJxyvcVeBs9Ylyo0umsmvyJaG6PMeZGg48vvhrv9/prr2OiecO9ocOwjNDgPQF7lsFE41hpyMEiKaXYJRXccfT6Y4cKiJDtkA+bzrW4Jpy9p4XmWR6s5ejAZoo7Ws7W1qmWyaBm3/f7DpNZFYZyxSzRfbnmboJ/8vkJw/LCS1qo4qXCIY1g5jiiub0N3wISoBY5mjN/jFVmeapNsyTWumAfgGOtelNOTkN3dcnIH3QEwK0+EFoswx/Hu2QwGYFQVQuMOrGQM2nHgCFfDL0XFd2SQP0N2niaatYeHvVtxwxUIbFyrWf+lhGlWCglkv6njgAHlzmA== X-SONIC-DKIM-SIGN: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1622319910; bh=0Raub8PdcZJE+R2MLz/vl4bAhoxaYDIHtI0DnLYETV8=; h=X-Sonic-MF:Subject:From:Date:To:From:Subject; b=TDKQ7g11H22W71FGcwN69quHFR5uY8jorY5xEzdliaqrK9ge0/jt0qREtN4dsZbqfacKsfeIEtW9zXzJCGJgAt2QCX5AhunuXwvjscIUKG5rh4955VS6xnubnWila2cMjlRyalldbWaD4rQW0ivmHXm9eFVfbFYMLgr6b6lYKJHFqN4sjrU4Mp9+8d1jkhPGnuSk7GRzaq9/X9st3pe8E4XSBdBuy0dzhbsIEb40Uz3dge3VP0uyuVfCPUgNCeFYnQ8x9eyA2pk2oxZ9DnF+4AWrNs572N9vYkrCKg+8WlFQ+OukAs9XA0ntwG+qqFgaNJAykHCRjS8pHVnLbitQOA== X-YMail-OSG: 8EB6HQ8VM1nyiDP7gSQHbEOmAH00tmzIB4w3GNlgI36RnGGZZvp9lskV.tp9_FO uNTCXh9OGoZD553fH9UgxHpt2N49lJMf7G.g0S1Ur7Hdxr7.nsARVQtXw7PMUwHG5y2tkuAr6K9H 3BXQKMZRwJIfn8_89gFDwU6A4zcFD4_4lOx4G75DIjO0tAd4TG9Kz1SGTnNN0IsCtGaZF0GcMuK_ xMD_1bvZTebRCwJDNzOOe2TgHLh.63PUjbZyQdl_6trAnKBDNh6ofxnQ6GTGrq0JD6zLNO1K3NXX e73rFODU1O65ssLq2oci.UV6PBqFtQk4FAU1r_k76fNslDaWE1ifatlXHjZHQo6j7ZXLH5nnHI5m apm0WV7V8Xn0V6IYdqLKve2VnDqd01vUJAXe668ZIf7oJgbmOk9jOub5EI0mAiuMM9mzvspG5GGj 3Sz5XEVZl9sjPqpY7HkprA6oXG7q.3.FlrCOg8fgNvbQNL8VZ.JwMTpXiSCjoOpSzrdBG_SxwaRU up.aCwhybdUjEb4mSUBOKyhU9BoulWo1PVSb6rZvHcoffbIKtC.1OS1smDKNTfRSPjH0zMjzU6m1 B5DwmTtDTbVDMz59ONr2z1fZoNGy9GnEm4BOn_f.hyRe1rISH412EKC3l20Wltookbn11YON4sHz 1T9bKoCKtm2yPt.ZSMtcG44IU5FXZMw4B3X2HSrZsJZF.Q8y_4pBwujQyWmzYjRHCUbb_xVqVk1G HlixcovY49awQdHg2cL0paCnnZQTr68V5q41QNWOoNrXDAObL0O7zDh.gXn.5jYk2OVx9dovoLjR nYFW1qe27gqv2HQ40RKutK17xGxavDLkzqSkUzkUPIUoB_fX2cBAFAcJgVyhLwaiCP2dE1bA3Jj9 N9VxFjj8Kb.KxBDjiscshjx3hzKQK0zMPQZ0J0Y_renZBEyIb0m8XYtXmIYEf27p8cAM4G9SK3Xt 41IFycUd.A0lAAtFkOWly1CNGGZnxhdBwokO1XQfnFNIAiIC01q_pJDzJs1EUoEBog3wVu2X8CML 8OE9ZaVznmSaOL3j9hQ288AUj6B7AXDteFXc3kpEVTSCISBETY0MbIipW7bQWE9Jgl00oScKDnL6 vY2io_a5eisvY0ALQhrgWWwTu7_p4n82t8Efg2YI1In4XSzBAJWoGkaVP9AAGd7oMUUjhT5rzL92 s1sK36.Q.44S1CkK5WPK160wY8hUL1UPxz.vJX_7CaZWfkRn3b6P5f7AvXTNfZtCd_f4QtX3Bvhn Mn.zFpvH0Z5YQULquaCVR_Z0Ha634WQ6tMsjRr.SmKVqukXb_7oKiUVOEa6ZJex9Z2PwHnh4db6f Oyomoigkhc84L2OSaRKoxRjM84aFv9lh4HV34inTUcZqyzF1b.GeJXh15OeG_TI1ClApP7sYOpz0 .Sae_bJwYWxrOkk.Pl6vTveVtoz5PqV5UpYIrsw1m6u6dSousdIMQnam5R9FDC13pWSP3PIfjGZ4 92LObL01A8r0pjDrclUD0XQXFdznVWY4Td1Ji5i1_R77bCpv6Wu22qgfWtsZ1tGIMTraUVImqqnO iImJXOI7jiYnuQ0qvQ223JnpPZ3RGBs6SLSfSkm3JneoLPimRTCU_24wmzA4ZhJcTpyuItqY3uBJ 4Dsb1V0CP5YFRElHq_8H4XY11Hd4bS2um7cWEISFhe6SQbz8iRjLhn_O8gQVfsysH4in17owq1Vb KBF_cI97qyuuunier2npPf1FUWKGMVrm20XmGnABgIXOXv64uIrgz6yFu7VAHMiiMYzl3WsYQ6Bd U_vjps4p0N4bSawcw8C.y4oYFrkOPYfOiHzfJxKWmhj4o8YF6fSRgugjsNYSoTdfzVmYnUpNJNBO pJEEUv7X19kOVaJ.kOw6SlN7LbUXXuV8Pq7ZDVgaNmq.kq8xIx2VuHUBlsM5yxtnBgSLo83VWswx Y2dF8Aq0_f2BssR1CzU.RWyg7eN20qhTMLhz94lytpZaSWKMekvTRGZZKCX5YjIFOSH46DUZ5XiM n69cHGN.cGX66HQgMNiM4FFA5bxxx9BcdZ9oCx8Cmwjo75YEYixBVDsaVhSWF1AZOL4JiFVG3sbV FiX.vVSlHtvamyi0BLQVb6B8vramW16YSiNi1yDPw62KMkPuJvPc3RMItSdk.UGk7JFetTNMVPMN EoSYZhR_7npTWzoe0BmCxs7rYNfnMdmSYrwzljp7EFcPde3dHc_saA64H.h0MuoDO.2M5OwITO0J UKJCRZ5SRnHXbGYcKszaXFvTEAzuOwP2IdlR43oKqhsDqfuhniqGhLqmejr8aELPBNkwFjFmwSxz snzDKZ730SuHVmswRgtW9fK4vbHtclgy2YXxGg74Ha1kebLr2DkgZRfTuC5PbkAOLF1P4GVnvALU aEAyudGBu6BBaSrtXwKI5OFA8xTVXrMoKkH5GXOZW2QNFUbv4_Wwez2GtuLOgTWE9T67IdUfe8KJ g2ZC7TfWZ9lV2q9edendcE1bSmZfT4WcdNs7CHbCMbQh0OPpwZPy7GBDNqFkDd.o6zrAnAvgO25c LZzdj.CtWVoMzGjQDR98FBRtNBEXbUasNvaMlqHqKPCgAsAJE21GTY1kNSxfw1.yTZVP3T8O3HJn EuivBVFxQc7rvraVnWJXSUHb9hAIY9LYCAZw3Pj.0IUDRvE9BL4P9qtHG2kxQkSkPYHxv_9o- X-Sonic-MF: Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic301.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with HTTP; Sat, 29 May 2021 20:25:10 +0000 Received: by kubenode514.mail-prod1.omega.bf1.yahoo.com (VZM Hermes SMTP Server) with ESMTPA ID 6949223eab58cfe0afae3c20c4a03d16; Sat, 29 May 2021 20:25:07 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-current List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.80.0.2.43\)) Subject: Re: I got a panic for "nvme0: cpl does not map to outstanding cmd" on a MACHIATObin Double Shot In-Reply-To: Date: Sat, 29 May 2021 13:25:04 -0700 Cc: freebsd-current , freebsd-arm Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <4515C859-98C7-4FE2-AFBA-08CFF28D0774@yahoo.com> References: <063D5E36-126F-497C-97AF-827BADC1ED2F.ref@yahoo.com> <063D5E36-126F-497C-97AF-827BADC1ED2F@yahoo.com> <90A23579-61B7-4619-AFD7-68439FCC16F3@yahoo.com> To: Warner Losh X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.80.0.2.43) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FstMr6Gn0z4YRH X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=yahoo.com header.s=s2048 header.b=iokO3iQs; dmarc=pass (policy=reject) header.from=yahoo.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of marklmi@yahoo.com designates 98.137.64.148 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=marklmi@yahoo.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.16 / 15.00]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[yahoo.com]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ptr:yahoo.com]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[yahoo.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[yahoo.com,reject]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[yahoo.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:36647, ipnet:98.137.64.0/20, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[yahoo.com:dkim]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[98.137.64.148:from]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[yahoo.com:s=s2048]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.34)[0.340]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[98.137.64.148:from:127.0.2.255]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[98.137.64.148:from]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[98.137.64.148:from]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-current] Reply-To: marklmi@yahoo.com From: Mark Millard via freebsd-current X-Original-From: Mark Millard X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N On 2021-May-29, at 01:15, Mark Millard wrote: > On 2021-May-23, at 00:46, Mark Millard via freebsd-current = wrote: >=20 >> On 2021-May-23, at 00:08, Mark Millard via freebsd-current = wrote: >>=20 >>> On 2021-May-22, at 22:16, Warner Losh wrote: >>>=20 >>>> On Sat, May 22, 2021 at 10:44 PM Mark Millard via freebsd-arm = wrote: >>>> # mount -onoatime 192.168.1.187:/usr/ports/ /mnt/ >>>> # diff -r /usr/ports/ /mnt/ | more >>>> nvme0: cpl does not map to outstanding cmd >>>> cdw0:00000000 sqhd:0020 sqid:0003 cid:007e p:1 sc:00 sct:0 m:0 = dnr:0 >>>> panic: received completion for unknown cmd >>>>=20 >>>> cid 0x7e has no currently active command. The cid is used by the = driver >>>> to map completions back to requests. >>>>=20 >>>> So, there's usually 3 possibilities that I've seen this with. >>>>=20 >>>> (1) There's a missing cache flush so you get a bogus cpl back = because something stale >>>> was read. It's unlikely to be this one because the rest of this = look like a successful >>>> command completed: sc =3D 0 is successful completion and sct is a = generic command queued. >>>>=20 >>>> (2) We're looking at the completion record twice because we failed = to properly update the >>>> head pointer and we've already completed the command. I've only = ever seen this in a >>>> panic situation where we interrupt the completion routine because = something else >>>> paniced. >>>>=20 >>>> (3) There's something that's corrupting the act_tr array in the = qpair. I've not seen this, >>>> but if something else smashes that area (zeroing it in this case), = then that could cause >>>> an error like this. >>>=20 >>> Of note may be that I buildworld and buildkernel with extra >>> tuning enabled, targeting the cortex-a72. In one past example >>> this lead to finding a missing synchronization related to XHCI >>> handling that was fixed. (The fix was not aarch64 specific at >>> all.) For that: A cortex-a53 did not show the problem with or >>> without that tuning. A cortex-a72 showed the problem only with >>> the cortex-a72 tuning, not with targeting a cortex-a53 tuning >>> or generic armv7, for example. >>>=20 >>> Not that I've any evidence specifically suggesting such would >>> be involved here. But it might be good to keep in mind as a >>> possaibility. >>>=20 >>>> Or it could be something new I've not seen nor thought about = before. >>>>=20 >>>> cpuid =3D 3 >>>> time =3D 1621743752 >>>> KDB: stack backtrace: >>>> db_trace_self() at db_trace_self >>>> db_trace_self_wrapper() at db_trace_self_wrapper+0x30 >>>> vpanic() at vpanic+0x188 >>>> panic() at panic+0x44 >>>> nvme_qpair_process_completions() at = nvme_qpair_process_completions+0x1fc >>>> nvme_timeout() at nvme_timeout+0x3c >>>> softclock_call_cc() at softclock_call_cc+0x124 >>>> softclock() at softclock+0x60 >>>> ithread_loop() at ithread_loop+0x2a8 >>>> fork_exit() at fork_exit+0x74 >>>> fork_trampoline() at fork_trampoline+0x14 >>>> KDB: enter: panic >>>> [ thread pid 12 tid 100028 ] >>>> Stopped at kdb_enter+0x48: undefined f904411f >>>> db>=20 >>>>=20 >>>> Based on the "nvme" references, I expect this is tied to >>>> handling the Optane 480 GiByte that is in the PCIe slot >>>> and is the boot/only media for the machine doing the diff. >>>>=20 >>>> "db> dump" seems to have worked. >>>>=20 >>>> After the reboot, zpool scrub found no errors. >>>>=20 >>>> For reference: >>>>=20 >>>> # uname -apKU >>>> FreeBSD CA72_16Gp_ZFS 14.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 14.0-CURRENT #1 = main-n246854-03b0505b8fe8-dirty: Sat May 22 16:25:04 PDT 2021 = root@CA72_16Gp_ZFS:/usr/obj/BUILDs/main-CA72-dbg-clang/usr/main-src/arm64.= aarch64/sys/GENERIC-DBG-CA72 arm64 aarch64 1400013 1400013 >>>>=20 >>>> If you have the dump, I suggest starting to make sure that the = act_tr array looks sane. Make >>>> sure all the live pointers point to a sane looking tr. Make sure = that tr is on the active list, etc >>>>=20 >>>> It will take a fair amount of driver reading, though, to see how we = got here. I'd also check to >>>> make sure that qpair->num_enttries > cpl.cid (0x3e in this case). >>>>=20 >>>=20 >>> Okay. I got this while trying to test an odd diff -r over NFS >>> issue with the more recent software. So the two will potentially >>> compete for time. >>>=20 >>> As investigation will be exploratory for me, not familiar, I'll >>> probably publish periodic notes on things as I go along looking >>> at stuff. >>>=20 >>> My first is that the /var/crash/core.txt.0 has a gdb backtrace: >>>=20 >>> . . . >>> #10 0xffff00000047900c in panic ( >>> fmt=3D0x12 ) >>> at /usr/main-src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:843 >>> #11 0xffff0000002226b4 in nvme_qpair_process_completions ( >>> qpair=3Dqpair@entry=3D0xffffa00008724300) >>> at /usr/main-src/sys/dev/nvme/nvme_qpair.c:617 >>> #12 0xffff000000223354 in nvme_timeout = (arg=3Darg@entry=3D0xffffa0000b053980) >>> at /usr/main-src/sys/dev/nvme/nvme_qpair.c:938 >>> #13 0xffff000000495bf8 in softclock_call_cc (c=3D0xffffa0000b0539a0,=20= >>> cc=3Dcc@entry=3D0xffff000000de3500 , direct=3D0) >>> at /usr/main-src/sys/kern/kern_timeout.c:696 >>> #14 0xffff000000495fb0 in softclock (arg=3D0xffff000000de3500 = ) >>> at /usr/main-src/sys/kern/kern_timeout.c:816 >>> #15 0xffff0000004356dc in intr_event_execute_handlers (p=3D,=20 >>> ie=3D0xffffa000058bc700) at /usr/main-src/sys/kern/kern_intr.c:1168 >>> #16 ithread_execute_handlers (p=3D, = ie=3D0xffffa000058bc700) >>> at /usr/main-src/sys/kern/kern_intr.c:1181 >>> #17 ithread_loop (arg=3D, = arg@entry=3D0xffffa000058aef60) >>> at /usr/main-src/sys/kern/kern_intr.c:1269 >>> #18 0xffff000000431f6c in fork_exit ( >>> callout=3D0xffff000000435430 , = arg=3D0xffffa000058aef60,=20 >>> frame=3D0xffff0000eb7cc990) at = /usr/main-src/sys/kern/kern_fork.c:1083 >>> #19 >>>=20 >>> So via kgdb . . . >>>=20 >>> (kgdb) up 11 >>> #11 0xffff0000002226b4 in nvme_qpair_process_completions = (qpair=3Dqpair@entry=3D0xffffa00008724300) at = /usr/main-src/sys/dev/nvme/nvme_qpair.c:617 >>> 617 KASSERT(0, ("received completion for = unknown cmd")); >>>=20 >>> (kgdb) print/x cpl.cid >>> $4 =3D 0x7e >>> (kgdb) print/x qpair->num_entries >>> $5 =3D 0x100 >>>=20 >>> Based on also seeing the code: >>>=20 >>> qpair->act_tr =3D malloc_domainset(sizeof(struct nvme_tracker = *) * >>> qpair->num_entries, M_NVME, DOMAINSET_PREF(qpair->domain), >>> M_ZERO | M_WAITOK); >>>=20 >>> (kgdb) print qpair->act_tr >>> $6 =3D (struct nvme_tracker **) 0xffffa00008725800 >>> (kgdb) x/256g 0xffffa00008725800 >>> 0xffffa00008725800: 0x0000000000000000 0x0000000000000000 >>> 0xffffa00008725810: 0x0000000000000000 0x0000000000000000 >>> . . . >>> 0xffffa00008725fe0: 0x0000000000000000 0x0000000000000000 >>> 0xffffa00008725ff0: 0x0000000000000000 0x0000000000000000 >>>=20 >>> It was all zeros (null pointers). No "live" pointers and, so, >>> no tr's to inspect. >>>=20 >>> As none of this is familiar context beyond general programming >>> concepts, it may be some time before I find anything else >>> potentially of interest to report. If you have other specific >>> things you would like me to look at, let me know. >>>=20 >>=20 >> A fairly obvious thing I should have provided: >>=20 >> (kgdb) print/x *qpair >> $15 =3D {ctrlr =3D 0xffff0000fe154000, id =3D 0x3, domain =3D 0x0, = cpu =3D 0x2, vector =3D 0x3, rid =3D 0x4, res =3D 0xffffa000086ded80, = tag =3D 0xffffa0000877b780, num_entries =3D 0x100, num_trackers =3D = 0x80,=20 >> sq_tdbl_off =3D 0x1018, cq_hdbl_off =3D 0x101c, phase =3D 0x1, = sq_head =3D 0x1f, sq_tail =3D 0x20, cq_head =3D 0x20, num_cmds =3D = 0x420, num_intr_handler_calls =3D 0xe66c, num_retries =3D 0x0, = num_failures =3D 0x0,=20 >> cmd =3D 0xffff000100ebb000, cpl =3D 0xffff000100ebf000, dma_tag =3D = 0xffffa0000b093e00, dma_tag_payload =3D 0xffffa000059ef000, queuemem_map = =3D 0xffffa00005a07700, cmd_bus_addr =3D 0xacbb000,=20 >> cpl_bus_addr =3D 0xacbf000, free_tr =3D {tqh_first =3D = 0xffffa0000b053a80, tqh_last =3D 0xffffa0000869da80}, outstanding_tr =3D = {tqh_first =3D 0xffffa0000b053980, tqh_last =3D 0xffffa0000b053980}, = queued_req =3D { >> stqh_first =3D 0x0, stqh_last =3D 0xffffa000087243c8}, act_tr =3D = 0xffffa00008725800, is_enabled =3D 0x1, lock =3D {lock_object =3D = {lo_name =3D 0xffff00000090321f, lo_flags =3D 0x1030000, lo_data =3D = 0x0,=20 >> lo_witness =3D 0xffffa0043fd96080}, mtx_lock =3D 0x0}} >>=20 >> Looks like I need to boot into the non-debug builds for the >> other problem I'm testing for repeatability after a commit. >=20 >=20 > I've no figured out anything interesting so far. >=20 > But I've run into something that looks odd to me > (not that I've any evidence it is related to the > panic, more likely my ignorance): >=20 > There is a use of atomic_store_rel_int(&qpair->cq_head, 0) > for which I do not find any matching atomic_load_acq_int > use (or other explicit _acq), so so there is no "synchronizes > with" status in the code to establish an ordering across > threads that involves the atomic_store_rel_int that I've > found, just implicit/default relaxed-load-operations. A grep > for "cq_head" under dev/nvme/ shows only: >=20 > ./dev/nvme/nvme_private.h: uint32_t cq_head; > ./dev/nvme/nvme_sysctl.c: SYSCTL_ADD_UINT(ctrlr_ctx, que_list, = OID_AUTO, "cq_head", > ./dev/nvme/nvme_sysctl.c: CTLFLAG_RD, &qpair->cq_head, 0, > ./dev/nvme/nvme_qpair.c: * below, but before we can reset = cq_head to zero at 2. Also cope with > ./dev/nvme/nvme_qpair.c: if (qpair->cq_head =3D=3D = qpair->num_entries) { > ./dev/nvme/nvme_qpair.c: * Here we know that = we need to zero cq_head and then negate > ./dev/nvme/nvme_qpair.c: * the phase, which = hasn't been assigned if cq_head isn't > ./dev/nvme/nvme_qpair.c: qpair->cq_head =3D 0; > ./dev/nvme/nvme_qpair.c: } else if (qpair->cq_head =3D=3D= 0) { > ./dev/nvme/nvme_qpair.c: cpl =3D = qpair->cpl[qpair->cq_head]; > ./dev/nvme/nvme_qpair.c: * qpair->cq_head at 1 = below. Later, we re-enter this > ./dev/nvme/nvme_qpair.c: * won't have updated = cq_head. Rather than panic again, > ./dev/nvme/nvme_qpair.c: = nvme_dump_completion(&qpair->cpl[qpair->cq_head]); > ./dev/nvme/nvme_qpair.c: if (++qpair->cq_head =3D=3D = qpair->num_entries) { /* 1 */ > ./dev/nvme/nvme_qpair.c: = atomic_store_rel_int(&qpair->cq_head, 0); /* 2 */ > ./dev/nvme/nvme_qpair.c: qpair->cq_hdbl_off, = qpair->cq_head); > ./dev/nvme/nvme_qpair.c: qpair->sq_head =3D qpair->sq_tail =3D = qpair->cq_head =3D 0; >=20 > (2 lines above the last has the atomic_store_rel_int use.) >=20 > atomic_thread_fence_rel use would have "synchronizes > with" based on ordinary loads reading something stored > after the atomic_thread_fence_rel. Such is documented > in "man atomic". But that is not what this code is doing. > "man atomic" does not mention ordinary loads getting such > a status by reading what an atomic_store_rel_int wrote. > It does reference the atomic_thread_fence_rel related > status for ordinary loads. >=20 > So I'm clueless about what is intended to be going on > relative to that "atomic_store_rel_int(&qpair->cq_head, 0)". > Overall, the code does not appear to me to match up with the > aarch64, powerpc64, or powerpc code generation requirements > to have any matching "synchronizes with" relationships. > (I'll not list machine instruction sequences here. I'd have > to look up the detailed sequences. But, as I remember, more > than a load is involved in the code sequences for the > acquire side on these types of processors. Nothing in the > source indicates to generate the additional code as far as > I can tell.) Adding notes about the code generation, using fairly weak sequences (these are for C++/C11 semantics as I understand): (Picking prefix-form for powerpc:) powerpc Load Relaxed vs. Acquire: ld vs. ld;cmp;bc;isync powerpc Fence: Acquire: lwsync powerpc Store Relaxed vs. Release: st vs. "Fence: Release";st powerpc Fence: Release: lwsync Note: I am unsure how the above mixes with FreeBSD's plain-load vs. release-fence rules for atomic, for example. I've never seen a instruction level breakdowns of what implements FreeBSD's specific rules for powerpc64. aarch64 Load Relaxed vs. Acquire: LDR vs. LDAR aarch64 Fence: Acquire: DMB ISH LD aarch64 Store Relaxed vs. Release: STR vs. STLR aarch64 Fence: Release: DMB ISH Note: Again I am unsure of the pain-load vs. acquire-fence rule for FreeBSD. And, here, similarly for the plain-store vs. release-fence rule. I've never seen a instruction level breakdowns of what implements FreeBSD's specific rules for aarch64. armv7 Load Relaxed vs. Acquire: ldr vs. ldr;"Fence: Acquire" (or = ldr;teq;beq;isb) armv7 Fence: Acquire: dmb ish armv7 Store Relaxed vs. Release: str vs. "Fence: Release";str armv7 Fence: Release: dmb ish Note: The above fits with FreeBSD's plain-load vs. release-fence and plain-stores vs. acquire-fence rules because the fences are used to form Store-Release and Load-Acquire. (If I gather correctly FreeBSD does not support aarch32 for its distinctions from armv7, for example the aarch32's alternative SeqCst mapping that does not mix well with the armv7 mapping. Still I list aarch32 for reference.) aarch32 Load Relaxed vs. Acquire: LDR vs. LDA aarch32 Fence: Acquire: DMB ISH LD aarch32 Store Relaxed vs. Release: STR vs. STL aarch32 Fence: Release: DMB ISH Note: Again I would be unsure of the pain-load vs. acquire-fence rule for FreeBSD. Similarly for the plain-store vs. release-fence rule. I got these code sequences from: https://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~pes20/cpp/cpp0xmappings.html I was unable to use the code sequences to figure out the intended operation of the: atomic_store_rel_int(&qpair->cq_head, 0) absent any atomic_load_acq_int to match --and everything else being based on just plain load/store for cq_head . =3D=3D=3D Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away in early 2018-Mar) From nobody Sun May 30 23:13:13 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-current@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 088C7BF695D for ; Sun, 30 May 2021 23:13:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from asomers@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ot1-f44.google.com (mail-ot1-f44.google.com [209.85.210.44]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FtZ3V23Ddz4ggL; Sun, 30 May 2021 23:13:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from asomers@gmail.com) Received: by mail-ot1-f44.google.com with SMTP id u25-20020a0568302319b02902ac3d54c25eso9462336ote.1; Sun, 30 May 2021 16:13:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=ZSbGSWmwlCRyE8ekC1njS7e14C5fhULh8COusqm6q8g=; b=Lqau6gs3Znpl6nt/kEiNOPAL1yVU8RUmZGqxvKvhKZOpKsJQS4qmFiPEIohDrkY0Yk v8a9unA2lD9ACj64V0+If7KM7K1IiAN3dV3le1IlhP289RHwwiPdi4OiD+xTxxm6KHsx q4COAH45WE0QQuWMORP1Igg4RrCngV0hEEhmjvcRssqt3DYUeMvNMRMnhZpRywfWKdKK 5aRjxjjQoqeE1596X18iLMh9j4OYXBOEBf9CPReezJy3YXaH9yaUI7kJ9kyYMA9ECz4+ GtBGxetDf9XXSEipC3AZ3l67t9lrYOYOIbMq32P1NF2hGtZrwF8HCn4ohHyBQ8l63hts jLMA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533cZDh7YqarVzG7Uk9umZ4PhK2wwsakHx8HutESSz8SsrUn2BYr a1FiJKiOqVs553s0geUVgayKpxvei25UdYLnaLRew0LVP14zwQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxzd8MwmJtjBR7A3YBceHGuw9YXFRnHPoVIVc/Qiizo5A4TULqvn0BeHPn2UM8eJmYg6NJOLz39Q59fA+9n2BU= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:349b:: with SMTP id c27mr15799163otu.251.1622416404805; Sun, 30 May 2021 16:13:24 -0700 (PDT) List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-current List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Alan Somers Date: Sun, 30 May 2021 17:13:13 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Help wanted: volunteer yourselves in .github/CODEOWNERS To: FreeBSD CURRENT , Adrian Chadd , rrs@freebsd.org, Rick Macklem Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000007c7af305c39441d9" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FtZ3V23Ddz4ggL X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of asomers@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.44 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=asomers@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.86 / 15.00]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:209.85.128.0/17]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_GOOD(0.00)[209.85.210.44:from]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.86)[-0.856]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[freebsd.org,gmail.com]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[asomers@freebsd.org,asomers@gmail.com]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[209.85.210.44:from]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[asomers@freebsd.org,asomers@gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:209.85.128.0/17, country:US]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; FREEFALL_USER(0.00)[asomers]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[freebsd.org]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[209.85.210.44:from:127.0.2.255]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[209.85.210.44:from]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-current] X-Spam: Yes X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: Y --0000000000007c7af305c39441d9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Strangers are submitting pull requests to our Github mirror, but we rarely pay attention. I just added a .github/CODEOWNERS file to our repo to automatically assign reviewers to PRs. I based it off of the contents of the current MAINTAINERS file. But it's incomplete. Please add yourself if: * You don't have a github account associated with your FreeBSD email address. I'm talking to you, adrian@, macklem@, and rrs@ . * You are part of a team, like secteam@ or re@ . You'll have to create the team at https://github.com/orgs/freebsd/teams then you can add it to the list. * You previously signed up for Phabricator notifications with Herald, but didn't sign up in MAINTAINERS. I can't see everybody's Phabricator assignments. * You never signed up in MAINTAINERS before, but you really ought to because you care deeply about some particular subsystem. -Alan --0000000000007c7af305c39441d9--