From owner-freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Sun May 16 21:00:18 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E95AE630E50 for ; Sun, 16 May 2021 21:00:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FjvmL4Y09z3qnF for ; Sun, 16 May 2021 21:00:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 99A96630ED9; Sun, 16 May 2021 21:00:18 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: fs@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 970CE630F61 for ; Sun, 16 May 2021 21:00:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FjvmL3G7qz3qcw for ; Sun, 16 May 2021 21:00:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4ABBA1FAB3 for ; Sun, 16 May 2021 21:00:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 14GL0ILi056288 for ; Sun, 16 May 2021 21:00:18 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from bugzilla@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 14GL0Ifc056287 for fs@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 16 May 2021 21:00:18 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <202105162100.14GL0Ifc056287@kenobi.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: bugzilla set sender to bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org To: fs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Problem reports for fs@FreeBSD.org that need special attention Date: Sun, 16 May 2021 21:00:18 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.34 X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 May 2021 21:00:19 -0000 To view an individual PR, use: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=(Bug Id). The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users, which need special attention. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and obsolete releases. Status | Bug Id | Description ------------+-----------+--------------------------------------------------- New | 203492 | mount_unionfs -o below causes panic Open | 144447 | [zfs] sharenfs fsunshare() & fsshare_main() non f Open | 211491 | System hangs after "Uptime" on reboot with ZFS Open | 221909 | [ZFS] Add a sysctl to toggle send_corrupt_data Open | 237067 | ZFS: Crash in vdev_dtl_reassess when using GELI w Open | 240831 | zfs: Panic during snapshot on 12.1-STABLE r352648 Open | 243973 | [zfs] rollback segmentation fault Open | 244656 | zfs: resilver doesn't provide enough information Open | 244692 | gjournal: Does not support TRIM Open | 244899 | [PATCH] zfs: xattr on a symlink target > 136 caus Open | 251035 | [zfs] Allow 64 bit ZFS to support 32 bit ioctls ( 11 problems total for which you should take action. From owner-freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Mon May 17 13:04:44 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02FCD64778F for ; Mon, 17 May 2021 13:04:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FkK976KKyz4ncj for ; Mon, 17 May 2021 13:04:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id D8E6464759E; Mon, 17 May 2021 13:04:43 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: fs@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8A4A64759D for ; Mon, 17 May 2021 13:04:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FkK975h8hz4nbJ for ; Mon, 17 May 2021 13:04:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC7854A80 for ; Mon, 17 May 2021 13:04:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 14HD4hwI076076 for ; Mon, 17 May 2021 13:04:43 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 14HD4hUc076075 for fs@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 17 May 2021 13:04:43 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: fs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 255930] ocs_fc Lost all connected devices after some use. Date: Mon, 17 May 2021 13:04:43 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: Unspecified X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: linimon@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: fs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: assigned_to Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 May 2021 13:04:44 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D255930 Mark Linimon changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|bugs@FreeBSD.org |fs@FreeBSD.org --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Mon May 17 15:58:00 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5928C64BCB9 for ; Mon, 17 May 2021 15:58:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from pyroxene2a.sentex.ca (pyroxene19.sentex.ca [IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:3::19]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "pyroxene.sentex.ca", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FkP131XWQz3vJT; Mon, 17 May 2021 15:57:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from [IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:4:4c28:b8e3:861c:babc] ([IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:4:4c28:b8e3:861c:babc]) by pyroxene2a.sentex.ca (8.16.1/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 14HFvvHA087768 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 17 May 2021 11:57:58 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) To: Alan Somers Cc: freebsd-fs References: <866d6937-a4e8-bec3-d61b-07df3065fca9@sentex.net> From: mike tancsa Subject: Re: speeding up zfs send | recv (update) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 17 May 2021 11:57:58 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Language: en-US X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FkP131XWQz3vJT X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of mike@sentex.net designates 2607:f3e0:0:3::19 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=mike@sentex.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.00 / 15.00]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FREEFALL_USER(0.00)[mike]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[2607:f3e0:0:3::19:from]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; HFILTER_HELO_IP_A(1.00)[pyroxene2a.sentex.ca]; HFILTER_HELO_NORES_A_OR_MX(0.30)[pyroxene2a.sentex.ca]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(1.00)[0.998]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f3e0::/32]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[2607:f3e0:0:3::19:from:127.0.2.255]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[sentex.net]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:11647, ipnet:2607:f3e0::/32, country:CA]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-fs] X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 May 2021 15:58:00 -0000 On 5/13/2021 11:37 AM, Alan Somers wrote: > On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 8:45 AM mike tancsa > wrote: > > For offsite storage, I have been doing a zfs send across a 10G > link and > noticed something I don't understand with respect to speed.=C2=A0 I= have a > > > Is this a high latency link?=C2=A0 ZFS send streams can be bursty.=C2=A0= Piping > the stream through mbuffer helps with that.=C2=A0 Just google "zfs send= > mbuffer" for some examples.=C2=A0 And be aware that your speed may be > limited by the sender.=C2=A0 Especially if those small files are random= ly > spread across the platter, your sending server's disks may be the > limiting factor.=C2=A0 Use gstat to check. > -Alan Just a quick follow up.=C2=A0 I was doing some tests with just mbuffer, mbuffer and ssh, and just ssh (aes128-gcm) with an compressed stream and non compressed stream (zfs send vs zfs send -c).=C2=A0 Generally, didnt f= ind too much of a difference.=C2=A0 I was testing on a production server that= is generally uniformly busy, so it wont be 100% reliable, but I think close enough as there is not much variance in the back ground load nor in the results. I tried this both with datasets that were backups of mailspools, so LOTS of little files and big directories as well as with zfs datasets with a few big files.=C2=A0 On the mail spool just via mbuffer (no ssh involved at all) zfs send summary:=C2=A0 514 GiByte in 1h 09min 35.9sec - average of=C2=A0 126 MiB/= s zfs send -c summary:=C2=A0 418 GiByte in 1h 05min 58.5sec - average of=C2=A0 108 MiB/= s and the same dataset, sending just through OpenSSH took 1h:06m (zfs send) and 1h:01m (zfs send -c) On the large dataset (large VMDK files), similar pattern. I did find one interesting thing, when I was testing with a smaller dataset of just 12G.=C2=A0 As the server has 65G of ram, 29 allocated to ARC, sending a z= fs stream with -c made a giant difference. I guess there is some efficiency with sending something thats already compressed in arc ? Or maybe its just all cache effect. Testing with one with about 1TB of referenced data using mbuffer with and without ssh=C2=A0 and just ssh zfs send with mbuffer and ssh summary:=C2=A0 772 GiByte in 51min 06.2sec - average of=C2=A0 258 MiB/s zfs send -c summary:=C2=A0 772 GiByte in 1h 22min 09.3sec - average of=C2=A0 160 MiB/= s And the same dataset just with ssh -- zfs send 53min and zfs send -c 55mi= n and just mbuffer (no ssh) summary:=C2=A0 772 GiByte in 56min 45.7sec - average of=C2=A0 232 MiB/s (= zfs send -c) summary: 1224 GiByte in 53min 20.4sec - average of=C2=A0 392 MiB/s (zfs s= end) This seems to imply the disk is the bottleneck. mbuffer doesnt seem to make much of a difference either way.=C2=A0 Straight up ssh looks to be f= ine / best. Next step is going to allocate a pair of SSDs as special allocation class vdevs to see if it starts to make a difference for all that metadata. I guess I will have to send/resend the datasets to make sure they make full use of the special vdevs =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 ----Mike From owner-freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Mon May 17 17:13:08 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B80E964DD3A for ; Mon, 17 May 2021 17:13:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FkQgm3W8Yz4dWD for ; Mon, 17 May 2021 17:13:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 7581F64DE13; Mon, 17 May 2021 17:13:08 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: fs@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74BFD64DF89 for ; Mon, 17 May 2021 17:13:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FkQgm0X3dz4dfk for ; Mon, 17 May 2021 17:13:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E9B2610103 for ; Mon, 17 May 2021 17:13:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 14HHD7np011469 for ; Mon, 17 May 2021 17:13:07 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 14HHD76I011468 for fs@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 17 May 2021 17:13:07 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: fs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 255930] ocs_fc Lost all connected devices after some use. Date: Mon, 17 May 2021 17:13:07 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: Unspecified X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: chuck@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: scsi@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc assigned_to Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 May 2021 17:13:08 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D255930 Chuck Tuffli changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |chuck@FreeBSD.org Assignee|fs@FreeBSD.org |scsi@FreeBSD.org --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Mon May 17 17:17:24 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1418B64DCFB for ; Mon, 17 May 2021 17:17:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FkQmg6YFsz4f3s for ; Mon, 17 May 2021 17:17:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id DE69264DFBE; Mon, 17 May 2021 17:17:23 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: fs@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE2FB64DFBD for ; Mon, 17 May 2021 17:17:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FkQmg5rYHz4f5B for ; Mon, 17 May 2021 17:17:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B2A857D4D for ; Mon, 17 May 2021 17:17:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 14HHHNNe012447 for ; Mon, 17 May 2021 17:17:23 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 14HHHNEx012446 for fs@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 17 May 2021 17:17:23 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: fs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 224292] processes are hanging in state ufs / possible deadlock in file system Date: Mon, 17 May 2021 17:17:23 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: mckusick@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Resolution: Overcome By Events X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: fs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: resolution bug_status Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 May 2021 17:17:24 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D224292 Kirk McKusick changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |Overcome By Events Status|Open |Closed --- Comment #19 from Kirk McKusick --- I believe that this problem has been resolved. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Mon May 17 17:17:25 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C52164E09B for ; Mon, 17 May 2021 17:17:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FkQmj2BYKz4fBM for ; Mon, 17 May 2021 17:17:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 4B10464E187; Mon, 17 May 2021 17:17:25 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: fs@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A68964E186 for ; Mon, 17 May 2021 17:17:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FkQmj1Lr2z4fBL for ; Mon, 17 May 2021 17:17:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 14C687F95 for ; Mon, 17 May 2021 17:17:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 14HHHPUE012501 for ; Mon, 17 May 2021 17:17:25 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 14HHHPhQ012500 for fs@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 17 May 2021 17:17:25 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: fs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 104406] [ufs] Processes get stuck in "ufs" state under persistent CPU load Date: Mon, 17 May 2021 17:17:25 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: dep_changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0-CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: mckusick@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Resolution: Overcome By Events X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: fs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 May 2021 17:17:25 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D104406 Bug 104406 depends on bug 224292, which changed state. Bug 224292 Summary: processes are hanging in state ufs / possible deadlock = in file system https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D224292 What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|Open |Closed Resolution|--- |Overcome By Events --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Mon May 17 17:17:27 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 101B664E027 for ; Mon, 17 May 2021 17:17:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FkQmk6f9kz4dvX for ; Mon, 17 May 2021 17:17:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id DDA9664E188; Mon, 17 May 2021 17:17:26 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: fs@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD0DA64E026 for ; Mon, 17 May 2021 17:17:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FkQmk5bG4z4f5G for ; Mon, 17 May 2021 17:17:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A7C657D4E for ; Mon, 17 May 2021 17:17:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 14HHHQv9012529 for ; Mon, 17 May 2021 17:17:26 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 14HHHQV0012528 for fs@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 17 May 2021 17:17:26 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: fs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 223491] fsck_ufs: Directory XXXX name not found Date: Mon, 17 May 2021 17:17:25 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: dep_changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: bin X-Bugzilla-Version: CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: mckusick@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Resolution: Not A Bug X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: fs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 May 2021 17:17:27 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D223491 Bug 223491 depends on bug 224292, which changed state. Bug 224292 Summary: processes are hanging in state ufs / possible deadlock = in file system https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D224292 What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|Open |Closed Resolution|--- |Overcome By Events --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Mon May 17 22:15:28 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85BA56349B3 for ; Mon, 17 May 2021 22:15:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joe@via.net) Received: from smtp4.via.net (smtp4.via.net [209.81.0.254]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "via.net", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FkYNb2zM2z4XZm for ; Mon, 17 May 2021 22:15:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joe@via.net) Received: from mail.via.net (mail.via.net [157.22.3.34]) by smtp4.via.net (8.15.2/8.14.1-VIANET) with ESMTPS id 14HMFOu8014873 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Mon, 17 May 2021 15:15:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.102.2 at smtp4.via.net Received: from [209.81.2.65] ([209.81.2.65]) by mail.via.net (8.15.2/8.14.1-VIANET) with ESMTP id 14HMFNP5021834 for ; Mon, 17 May 2021 15:15:23 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.102.2 at mail.via.net From: joe mcguckin Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.4\)) Subject: ZFS send? Message-Id: <248A667D-7257-46E6-B709-39BD009623D4@via.net> Date: Mon, 17 May 2021 15:15:13 -0700 To: freebsd-fs X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.4) X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (smtp4.via.net [209.81.0.254]); Mon, 17 May 2021 15:15:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FkYNb2zM2z4XZm X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of joe@via.net designates 209.81.0.254 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=joe@via.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.79 / 15.00]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+MX]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-0.999]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[209.81.0.254:from]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7091, ipnet:209.81.0.0/18, country:US]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FREEFALL_USER(0.00)[joe]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.99)[-0.992]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-fs@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[via.net]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[209.81.0.254:from:127.0.2.255]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.995]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[209.81.0.254:from]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-fs] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.34 X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 May 2021 22:15:28 -0000 Does zfs send create a completely identical file system on the receive = side? e.g. same inode numbers, etc? I=E2=80=99ve been using ZFS in conjunction with SAMBA to perform Apple = Time Machine backuos. It works like a charm. But I might need to move the dataset to another machine or to a newly = created filesystem with larger drives. I know TM somehow fingerprints the backup filesystem and is able to = detect when it=E2=80=99s moved to another disk. I wonder if that=E2=80=99s the case in my instance?=20 If I can zfs send and receive it, creating a identical filesystem down = to the inode level. I would think that moving the TM backup filesystem=20= would work. Any similar experience out there? Thanks, Joe Joe McGuckin ViaNet Communications joe@via.net 650-207-0372 cell 650-213-1302 office 650-969-2124 fax From owner-freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Mon May 17 18:22:06 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C55EF64F5B3 for ; Mon, 17 May 2021 18:22:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from px@i.kiev.ua) Received: from mail.saturnservice.com.ua (mail.saturnservice.com.ua [31.43.133.15]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FkSCJ6RRdz4sSP for ; Mon, 17 May 2021 18:22:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from px@i.kiev.ua) X-Footer: c2F0dXJuc2VydmljZS5jb20udWE= Received: from PhenomX6.local ([178.158.249.198]) (authenticated user senduser@saturnservice.com.ua) by mail.saturnservice.com.ua (Kerio Connect 8.5.3) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256 bits)) for freebsd-fs@freebsd.org; Mon, 17 May 2021 21:21:54 +0300 Date: Mon, 17 May 2021 21:21:47 +0300 From: px Reply-To: px Message-ID: <1007206382.20210517212147@i.kiev.ua> To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: fsck bad inode number 2(56) to nextinode MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FkSCJ6RRdz4sSP X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=fail reason="No valid SPF, No valid DKIM" header.from=i.kiev.ua (policy=none); spf=softfail (mx1.freebsd.org: 31.43.133.15 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of px@i.kiev.ua) smtp.mailfrom=px@i.kiev.ua X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.96 / 15.00]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[px@i.kiev.ua]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[31.43.133.15:from]; REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_SPF_SOFTFAIL(0.00)[~all]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[31.43.133.15:from:127.0.2.255]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.96)[-0.957]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:48438, ipnet:31.43.132.0/22, country:UA]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-fs]; DMARC_POLICY_SOFTFAIL(0.10)[i.kiev.ua : No valid SPF, No valid DKIM,none] X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 18 May 2021 05:14:33 +0000 X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 May 2021 18:22:06 -0000 Hi. This morning I've noticed that since yesterday I have a following message in /var/log/messages May 16 13:24:13 bsd-route fsck[1606]: /dev/ufs/pxstore: NO WRITE ACCESS May 16 13:24:13 bsd-route fsck[1606]: /dev/ufs/pxstore: UNEXPECTED INCONSISTENCY; RUN fsck MANUALLY. May 16 13:24:13 bsd-route fsck[1606]: /dev/ufs/pxstore: CANNOT SET FS_NEEDSFSCK FLAG Underlying hdd holds a single Jail with torrent client, so I've shut down the client, don't remember if I've also shut down the jail itself, then I've unmounted drive with -f switch, and run fsck on it. fsck found a lot of errors, like 129516299 DUP I=64686337 UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY 2661355758115450807 BAD I=23756482 UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY -8999617908267060188 BAD I=23756482 UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY CYLINDER GROUP 3944: INTEGRITY CHECK FAILED UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY INCORRECT BLOCK COUNT I=486994392 (56264 should be 49112) INODE 486994392: FILE SIZE 28746675 BEYOND END OF ALLOCATED FILE, SIZE SHOULD BE 25133056 and some others (you can see 512KB of the log here - https://pastebin.com/Xcm1iKCc), but in the end to my surprise fsck exited with the following error: INTERNAL ERROR: dups with softupdates UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY ** Phase 1b - Rescan For More DUPS fsck_ufs: bad inode number 2 to nextinode After some search I was lucky to find the following commit https://cgit.freebsd.org/src/commit/?id=bc444e2ec6e6cc9d96d35ab7ce3c02c0da952fad Fix fsck_ffs Pass 1b error exit "bad inode number 2 to nextinode". As I'm running 13-RELEASE, I went to https://download.freebsd.org/ftp/snapshots/amd64/13.0-STABLE/, downloaded base.txz file, took fsck* files from it, and put them instead of existing in /sbin, but the only change I've got is the number change from 2 to 256 INTERNAL ERROR: dups with softupdates UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY ** Phase 1b - Rescan For More DUPS fsck_ufs: bad inode number 256 to nextinode On fsck re-run I'm getting the same list of the errors, and the check ends with the same result. I've mounted the disk in r/o mode, and can see the folders structure just fine, random files check showed that they are fine, text/images/video renders without errors. SMART for disk is fine, general status is PASSED, and there are no reallocation events Any advice please how I can resolve the issue without moving all the data to other disk(s), and then re-formatting it? -- Best regards, px From owner-freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Tue May 18 09:02:54 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67EF46462A0 for ; Tue, 18 May 2021 09:02:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from SRS0=ywOk=KN=klop.ws=ronald-lists@realworks.nl) Received: from smtp-relay-int.realworks.nl (smtp-relay-int.realworks.nl [194.109.157.24]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Fkqld40mzz4Y60 for ; Tue, 18 May 2021 09:02:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from SRS0=ywOk=KN=klop.ws=ronald-lists@realworks.nl) Date: Tue, 18 May 2021 11:02:50 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=klop.ws; s=rw2; t=1621328571; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=MI5bth6JPv/cROr54LOjSxs5NmSIGMCWLaRop5a4HNA=; b=uhF2M6TIfp787H4X4ZaYf3iZo8jVJRMMn0fSJoH0uZjEIuRVaImQdRH9ozSxzF0I21K4Wh rV6bsMFxbAVRTtJ+q+bKF5mH/wUx1lVS7kpc1wvtuIAH4pr8/E5Oxel8O6Cve4Wq4RoSFS Gfr5lgBC8egtFdlABIovdhL4Q55jFNbCrIHpobV0KRh6FYotergYK/MpPfNw6egxyJ9c82 WTAU8jIIM0I9BTYKAYznDP00JlJexNS+HVT3bxpO5pMS3Jq+4ip7cEoZ3C250tU2n6h0no QjwogBtI2G24NL01HX6GwNnV5ngZtFgwPzbewB5/PZsEQsPF1rf/UqGKURUorQ== From: Ronald Klop To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Message-ID: <2129328533.54.1621328570713@localhost> In-Reply-To: <60a31920.197b3.499aad44@sjakie> References: <60a31920.197b3.499aad44@sjakie> Subject: Re: sjakie daily run output MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Realworks (560.140.acd595a5e7a) Importance: Normal X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Fkqld40mzz4Y60 X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=klop.ws header.s=rw2 header.b=uhF2M6TI; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=klop.ws; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of SRS0=ywOk=KN=klop.ws=ronald-lists@realworks.nl designates 194.109.157.24 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=SRS0=ywOk=KN=klop.ws=ronald-lists@realworks.nl X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.22 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_VERYGOOD(0.00)[194.109.157.24:from]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[klop.ws:s=rw2]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.90)[-0.901]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:194.109.157.0/24]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.12)[-0.123]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[klop.ws:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[klop.ws,none]; HAS_X_PRIO_THREE(0.00)[3]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[194.109.157.24:from]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[ronald-lists@klop.ws,SRS0=ywOk=KN=klop.ws=ronald-lists@realworks.nl]; RCVD_COUNT_ZERO(0.00)[0]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:3265, ipnet:194.109.0.0/16, country:NL]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[ronald-lists@klop.ws,SRS0=ywOk=KN=klop.ws=ronald-lists@realworks.nl]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-fs] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.34 X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 May 2021 09:02:54 -0000 Hi, This kind of defeats the purpose of this mail. :-) Scrubbing of zfs pools: starting scrub of pool 'zroot': consult 'zpool status zroot' for the result But fair enough, I don't have a patch to fix it and don't really care either. ;-) Regards, Ronald. Van: root@klop.ws Datum: dinsdag, 18 mei 2021 03:32 Aan: root Onderwerp: sjakie daily run output > > > Removing stale files from /var/preserve: > > Cleaning out old system announcements: > > Removing stale files from /var/rwho: > > Backup passwd and group files: > > Verifying group file syntax: > /etc/group is fine > > Backing up mail aliases: > > Dump of kern.geom.conftxt: > > Backup of partitions information for: > ada0 > ada1 > > Backup of boot partition content: > ada0p1 > > Rotating accounting logs and gathering statistics: > > [snip local info] > > Local system status: > 3:01AM up 10:05, 1 user, load averages: 0.44, 0.57, 1.05 > > Security check: > (output mailed separately) > > Checking userland and kernel versions: > Userland and kernel are in sync. > > Scrubbing of zfs pools: > starting scrub of pool 'zroot': > consult 'zpool status zroot' for the result > > Backing up pkg database: > > -- End of daily output -- > > > From owner-freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Tue May 18 12:22:04 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D694B64BE10 for ; Tue, 18 May 2021 12:22:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kraduk@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lf1-x12e.google.com (mail-lf1-x12e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12e]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Fkw9S1wltz3gxq for ; Tue, 18 May 2021 12:22:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kraduk@gmail.com) Received: by mail-lf1-x12e.google.com with SMTP id j6so11165731lfr.11 for ; Tue, 18 May 2021 05:22:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=ZEbXwSQ+RiBKfMcsLJ0lI1uzuWvNkL8gqHBH9VgUqls=; b=HrNbs8qwZgWMs0qOcSVlWynqeRaQZka9pOMjyS6B7LnqZOkc6Ca4Zqy7Mvh1EFznEF SQMtSiy82JtmRVxzDXatbWh5+seXJiboTP1tovtKIezjMfxfWyM0k24JLGqh3rwRSluE R/XkUGZa7IRg8bALHXlLPNxaX7xAO9M2dNtv8DriNR0vjUW0aXl12E+4zj15Xl8EGb4p 0KE2PqLSTnckHRcYmEXT6362chadbwaXW8L1kuTN646r1GKP6n/OGmhuXVwRSOKTIb6l kx+IO6PPrAoEaH3vAkxwoWiud7gV5gkloQvoqG3QP/JHPYeFx2NKVyzzdHNyw4Mcapmm UntQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ZEbXwSQ+RiBKfMcsLJ0lI1uzuWvNkL8gqHBH9VgUqls=; b=PxBWa8n108yZvUH8T4vthY+2edN+sf3izDFAidbyyVhZglHzxrhstsePhXVypua4dH LoeSgP+rcMu0YyeL//lvrMHq4ANtIFjsU9KTSvVzRFkFCMAwzqBgmlPmNQqYknV01J+H b+xr+aDTVmQy/0Q/wxFpGBgg5ErnmK/eQZRt/OVqXgbQqcFUqaxOKXlznsBgG2Fe3Fiz UJUB1PDjE+iUkX2T1btchvlkI7YWZ1VU0LDmjX++1YW3siaLMEqffJuZtaomrqXqxSfu xNAgZsyO7ef4oMPzcwSsOG0CL/RMNYgEAPxHJk92VefeOjioj4twSiQ0wWCAplAD2SKW yt/A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530tUzDy10rOmbOf1nfmB38gSU/hsfqN3Wos8H504hobl1BHRnIa eLAEvwfFYj9WDUWhFTxSCwhgvkfq3t3yvrjikcbD6DqecNs= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxRPvmmQlVDvyEaqi9Fy/QgQDyfqIi2UEamW0M0kxPOyHTVOgRSACNJjvd28y214Of9AmpXx78jOVesQoodHEQ= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:7c:: with SMTP id i28mr4074849lfo.24.1621340521929; Tue, 18 May 2021 05:22:01 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <248A667D-7257-46E6-B709-39BD009623D4@via.net> In-Reply-To: <248A667D-7257-46E6-B709-39BD009623D4@via.net> From: krad Date: Tue, 18 May 2021 13:21:50 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: ZFS send? To: joe mcguckin Cc: freebsd-fs X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Fkw9S1wltz3gxq X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=HrNbs8qw; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of kraduk@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4864:20::12e as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=kraduk@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.99 / 15.00]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a00:1450:4000::/36:c]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[2a00:1450:4864:20::12e:from]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2a00:1450::/32, country:US]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com:dkim]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(1.00)[1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-fs@freebsd.org]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.99)[0.989]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[2a00:1450:4864:20::12e:from:127.0.2.255]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2a00:1450:4864:20::12e:from]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-fs] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.34 X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 May 2021 12:22:04 -0000 Why not add the bigger drive to the zfs data set as a mirror of the one you want to remove. Once its resilvered detach the old drive. The extra capacity should become visible, although you might need a "zfs online -e ". On Mon, 17 May 2021 at 23:15, joe mcguckin wrote: > Does zfs send create a completely identical file system on the receive > side? e.g. same inode numbers, etc? > > I=E2=80=99ve been using ZFS in conjunction with SAMBA to perform Apple T= ime > Machine backuos. It works like a charm. > But I might need to move the dataset to another machine or to a newly > created filesystem with larger drives. > I know TM somehow fingerprints the backup filesystem and is able to detec= t > when it=E2=80=99s moved to another disk. > I wonder if that=E2=80=99s the case in my instance? > > If I can zfs send and receive it, creating a identical filesystem down t= o > the inode level. I would think that moving the TM backup filesystem > would work. > > Any similar experience out there? > > Thanks, > > Joe > > > Joe McGuckin > ViaNet Communications > > joe@via.net > 650-207-0372 cell > 650-213-1302 office > 650-969-2124 fax > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-fs@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-fs-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From nobody Tue May 18 17:26:35 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-fs@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 568B03FF32A for ; Tue, 18 May 2021 17:26:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from martin@lispworks.com) Received: from mail.lispworks.com (mail.lispworks.com [46.17.166.21]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Fl2x21VDvz3hC9 for ; Tue, 18 May 2021 17:26:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from martin@lispworks.com) Received: from higson.cam.lispworks.com (higson.cam.lispworks.com [192.168.1.7]) by lwfs1-cam.cam.lispworks.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 14IHQa6M072018; Tue, 18 May 2021 18:26:36 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from martin@lispworks.com) Received: from higson.cam.lispworks.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by higson.cam.lispworks.com (8.14.4) id 14IHQZ1Z000500; Tue, 18 May 2021 18:26:35 +0100 Received: (from martin@localhost) by higson.cam.lispworks.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id 14IHQZgT000497; Tue, 18 May 2021 18:26:35 +0100 Date: Tue, 18 May 2021 18:26:35 +0100 Message-Id: <202105181726.14IHQZgT000497@higson.cam.lispworks.com> From: Martin Simmons To: Ronald Klop CC: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org In-reply-to: <2129328533.54.1621328570713@localhost> (message from Ronald Klop on Tue, 18 May 2021 11:02:50 +0200 (CEST)) Subject: Re: sjakie daily run output References: <60a31920.197b3.499aad44@sjakie> <2129328533.54.1621328570713@localhost> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Fl2x21VDvz3hC9 X-Spamd-Bar: +++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of martin@lispworks.com has no SPF policy when checking 46.17.166.21) smtp.mailfrom=martin@lispworks.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [4.00 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[46.17.166.21:from]; FREEFALL_USER(0.00)[martin]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(1.00)[0.999]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[lispworks.com]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(1.00)[1.000]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[46.17.166.21:from:127.0.2.255]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(1.00)[1.000]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; RCVD_NO_TLS_LAST(0.10)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:51055, ipnet:46.17.166.0/24, country:GB]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-fs] List-Id: Filesystems List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-fs List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-fs@freebsd.org The message means that it has just started a scrub, so there is nothing else useful to include in the email yet. __Martin >>>>> On Tue, 18 May 2021 11:02:50 +0200 (CEST), Ronald Klop said: > > Hi, > > This kind of defeats the purpose of this mail. :-) > > Scrubbing of zfs pools: > starting scrub of pool 'zroot': > consult 'zpool status zroot' for the result > > But fair enough, I don't have a patch to fix it and don't really care either. ;-) > > Regards, > Ronald. > > > Van: root@klop.ws > Datum: dinsdag, 18 mei 2021 03:32 > Aan: root > Onderwerp: sjakie daily run output > > > > > > Removing stale files from /var/preserve: > > > > Cleaning out old system announcements: > > > > Removing stale files from /var/rwho: > > > > Backup passwd and group files: > > > > Verifying group file syntax: > > /etc/group is fine > > > > Backing up mail aliases: > > > > Dump of kern.geom.conftxt: > > > > Backup of partitions information for: > > ada0 > > ada1 > > > > Backup of boot partition content: > > ada0p1 > > > > Rotating accounting logs and gathering statistics: > > > > [snip local info] > > > > Local system status: > > 3:01AM up 10:05, 1 user, load averages: 0.44, 0.57, 1.05 > > > > Security check: > > (output mailed separately) > > > > Checking userland and kernel versions: > > Userland and kernel are in sync. > > > > Scrubbing of zfs pools: > > starting scrub of pool 'zroot': > > consult 'zpool status zroot' for the result > > > > Backing up pkg database: > > > > -- End of daily output -- > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-fs@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-fs-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From nobody Tue May 18 20:46:33 2021 X-Original-To: fs@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2BDA5744AB for ; Tue, 18 May 2021 20:46:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Fl7MY4dJ1z3F4x for ; Tue, 18 May 2021 20:46:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8422426403 for ; Tue, 18 May 2021 20:46:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 14IKkXYj001869 for ; Tue, 18 May 2021 20:46:33 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 14IKkXjd001868 for fs@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 18 May 2021 20:46:33 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: fs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 251363] use unionfs as a disk-cache for NFS [feature] Date: Tue, 18 May 2021 20:46:33 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.2-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: mckusick@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: fs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Filesystems List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-fs List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-fs@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D251363 Kirk McKusick changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|New |Open CC| |mckusick@FreeBSD.org --- Comment #18 from Kirk McKusick --- Using the union filesystem to cache NFS is a bad idea. The whole point of N= FS is to maintain cache coherency between the clients and the server. If a cli= ent writes a file, NFS will ensure that all the other NFS clients can see those changes. If a new copy of a binary is installed on the server, NFS will ens= ure that all the clients see the updated binary. The union filesystem provides = no coherency at all. NFS already does caching using the buffer cache. The buffer cache is a bett= er way to cache binaries as it only holds the pages of the binary that you are actively using. By contrast unionfs is going to copy the entire binary image before it can start up. And it will hold all of the binary in memory even if only a small part of it is being used. This technique may be usable in your environment, but it is absolutely not useful as a general-purpose tool. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From nobody Wed May 19 02:27:24 2021 X-Original-To: fs@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 735F75F4842 for ; Wed, 19 May 2021 02:27:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FlGwr2mbWz3vVG for ; Wed, 19 May 2021 02:27:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4481429C5 for ; Wed, 19 May 2021 02:27:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 14J2RO0H078125 for ; Wed, 19 May 2021 02:27:24 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 14J2ROn9078124 for fs@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 19 May 2021 02:27:24 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: fs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 251363] use unionfs as a disk-cache for NFS [feature] Date: Wed, 19 May 2021 02:27:24 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.2-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: raj@gusw.net X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: fs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Filesystems List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-fs List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-fs@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D251363 --- Comment #19 from Gunther Schadow --- I am certainly honored to be replied to by the one and only Kirk McKusick, = and of course I understand the cache consistency issue. HOWEVER, I am sure you = will also accept that the buffer cache is a very limited resource and generally = too small to hold a lot of binaries just in case. The truth is that /bin, /usr/bin, /lib and all that good stuff hardly never changes in a production system except for times of controlled upgrades. Therefore the argument that the UNIONFS cache would become stale is not rea= lly hard hitting. I think my approach has a very good purpose when and where applied with an understanding of the consequences. Finally, if you really wanted to do an unlimited cache that is kept consist= ent, then nothing should stop the addition of some additional update checks befo= re every access of the local cache on the source NFS, and likewise, writes cou= ld be written through to the NFS backend. In other words, NFS could have a loc= al unlimited size disk cache feature. But I doubt anyone would have fulfilled = my wish, so I went ahead and provided small improvements to the UNIONFS code to help me with my imperfect solution that's nevertheless good enough for me. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From nobody Wed May 19 02:47:49 2021 X-Original-To: fs@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 925975C4EC9 for ; Wed, 19 May 2021 02:47:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FlHNP3MR7z4WKt for ; Wed, 19 May 2021 02:47:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C09D2F0C for ; Wed, 19 May 2021 02:47:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 14J2lncP088705 for ; Wed, 19 May 2021 02:47:49 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 14J2lnFs088704 for fs@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 19 May 2021 02:47:49 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: fs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 251433] unionfs copymode transparent creates files with current euid instead of lower layer file owner uid. Date: Wed, 19 May 2021 02:47:49 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.2-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: raj@gusw.net X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: fs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Filesystems List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-fs List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-fs@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D251433 --- Comment #18 from Gunther Schadow --- Bump, bump, really, no comments at all? Hello? This was a bug. I think I fi= xed it. Don't we want bugs to be fixed? --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From nobody Wed May 19 03:08:51 2021 X-Original-To: fs@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FECC5CD83D for ; Wed, 19 May 2021 03:08:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FlHrh2hmYz4dB1 for ; Wed, 19 May 2021 03:08:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44F02341D for ; Wed, 19 May 2021 03:08:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 14J38qaW000665 for ; Wed, 19 May 2021 03:08:52 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 14J38q63000664 for fs@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 19 May 2021 03:08:52 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: fs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 255979] fsck bad inode number 2 (256) to nextinode Date: Wed, 19 May 2021 03:08:51 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: bin X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: linimon@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: fs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: assigned_to Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Filesystems List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-fs List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-fs@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D255979 Mark Linimon changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|bugs@FreeBSD.org |fs@FreeBSD.org --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From nobody Wed May 19 04:52:35 2021 X-Original-To: fs@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3932C5F0083 for ; Wed, 19 May 2021 04:52:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FlL8M11yTz3jF6 for ; Wed, 19 May 2021 04:52:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0BDC94A36 for ; Wed, 19 May 2021 04:52:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 14J4qYx2056498 for ; Wed, 19 May 2021 04:52:34 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 14J4qYFc056497 for fs@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 19 May 2021 04:52:34 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: fs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 251363] use unionfs as a disk-cache for NFS [feature] Date: Wed, 19 May 2021 04:52:35 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.2-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: mckusick@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: fs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Filesystems List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-fs List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-fs@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D251363 --- Comment #20 from Kirk McKusick --- (In reply to Gunther Schadow from comment #19) The buffer cache is no longer a limited resource as it has become merged wi= th the VM cache. Actually, the buffer cache is just a compatibility shim over = the VM cache. The point is that the entire physical memory is managed by the VM cache. Most of the pages are associated with pages in filesystems and some = are associated with running programs (stacks and heap pages). So whether you use those pages as part of NFS or the memory filesystem aggregated through the union filesystem, they are all coming from the same pool. Given the broken semantics and extra overhead of the union filesystem, you are better off letting NFS rather than the union and memory filesystem manage the pages. The role of the union filesystem is to allow the appearance of modification= of read-only media like DVDs or CD-ROMs. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From nobody Wed May 19 14:24:13 2021 X-Original-To: fs@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7565A86E652 for ; Wed, 19 May 2021 14:24:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FlZqx2p6Fz3L0V for ; Wed, 19 May 2021 14:24:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3EA2B14614 for ; Wed, 19 May 2021 14:24:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 14JEODAn063903 for ; Wed, 19 May 2021 14:24:13 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 14JEOD7g063902 for fs@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 19 May 2021 14:24:13 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: fs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 251363] use unionfs as a disk-cache for NFS [feature] Date: Wed, 19 May 2021 14:24:13 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.2-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: rmacklem@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: fs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Filesystems List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-fs List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-fs@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D251363 Rick Macklem changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rmacklem@FreeBSD.org --- Comment #21 from Rick Macklem --- A lack of any cache consistency guarantees is a major limitation and I tend to agree with Kirk that this should not be recommended practice. If it works for you, that's fine, but others would not understand the limitations of not having cache consistency and that would probably result in bug reports related to it. When I wrote the packrats code, cache consistency was maintained by the NFSv4 delegation. Although the code basically worked (I had not written the recovery code needed after a client reboot), I left the bits to rot because I did not think it was widely useful. I may eventually revisit that, since I can see cases where it could be useful. My intent was to handle laptops mounting through wifi/wan connections better, since those are often high latency connections. I suspect that some of your performance improvement is a result of the lack of cache consistency. For example, flushing of all written data to the server upon close(2) can be a big performance hit, but is required for close->open consistency. --> I honestly do not know how the Linux fscache code works, but I suspect that some variant of cache consistency is maintained by it. Another issue is that the comment in the bugs section of the mount_unionfs man page still applies (and is in caps). I don't know the details w.r.t. how unionfs is broken, but if it were easy to fix, someone would have done so. I do know that people report issues w.r.t. using unionfs on an NFS mount and I simply point out to them that it is broken. It does not make much sense to implement a new feature on top of a broken one, imho. kib@ is probably the only person who knows what the breakage in unionfs is and what needs to be done to fix it. rick ps: I don't think comments like "the one and only" are appreciated in the context you used it. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From nobody Wed May 19 18:21:32 2021 X-Original-To: fs@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FA878B9ED0 for ; Wed, 19 May 2021 18:21:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Flh5n0J7lz3H8S for ; Wed, 19 May 2021 18:21:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E066E16FFE for ; Wed, 19 May 2021 18:21:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 14JILWBd091956 for ; Wed, 19 May 2021 18:21:32 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 14JILWWV091955 for fs@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 19 May 2021 18:21:32 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: fs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 245907] fsck_ufs segfaults with gjournal (SU+J) Date: Wed, 19 May 2021 18:21:32 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: bin X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.1-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: rew@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: fs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc attachments.created Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Filesystems List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-fs List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-fs@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D245907 Robert Wing changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rew@FreeBSD.org --- Comment #6 from Robert Wing --- Created attachment 225092 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D225092&action= =3Dedit fsck_ffs fix Proposed patch, satisfies the previously provided reproducer. The segfault was being hit in ckfini() (sbin/fsck_ffs/fsutil.c) while attempting to traverse the buffer cache.=20 The tail queue used for the buffer cache isn't initialized before dropping = into gjournal_check(). The buffer cache appears to be unused when doing an `fsck_ffs -p` on a gjournaled filesystem. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From nobody Wed May 19 20:53:52 2021 X-Original-To: fs@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49FF48B5B78 for ; Wed, 19 May 2021 20:53:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FllTX0Kgcz3r1x for ; Wed, 19 May 2021 20:53:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D115B19735 for ; Wed, 19 May 2021 20:53:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 14JKrpo2070711 for ; Wed, 19 May 2021 20:53:51 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 14JKrpwM070710 for fs@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 19 May 2021 20:53:51 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: fs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 255979] fsck bad inode number 2 (256) to nextinode Date: Wed, 19 May 2021 20:53:52 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: bin X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: forums@px.in.ua X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: fs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Filesystems List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-fs List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-fs@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D255979 --- Comment #2 from Px --- (In reply to Kirk McKusick from comment #1) Hi Kirk, Thank you, with this patch applied fsck was able to complete Phase 1b, and following phases. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From nobody Wed May 19 21:01:38 2021 X-Original-To: fs@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB28D8BA6E6 for ; Wed, 19 May 2021 21:01:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FllfV3H5pz3vZ9 for ; Wed, 19 May 2021 21:01:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 52B6F19744 for ; Wed, 19 May 2021 21:01:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 14JL1c2V072853 for ; Wed, 19 May 2021 21:01:38 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 14JL1cnY072852 for fs@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 19 May 2021 21:01:38 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: fs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 245907] fsck_ufs segfaults with gjournal (SU+J) Date: Wed, 19 May 2021 21:01:38 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: bin X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.1-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: mckusick@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: mckusick@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: attachments.isobsolete cc bug_status assigned_to flagtypes.name attachments.created Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Filesystems List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-fs List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-fs@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D245907 Kirk McKusick changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #225092|0 |1 is obsolete| | CC| |mckusick@FreeBSD.org Status|New |In Progress Assignee|fs@FreeBSD.org |mckusick@FreeBSD.org Attachment #225097| |maintainer-approval+ Flags| | --- Comment #7 from Kirk McKusick --- Created attachment 225097 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D225097&action= =3Dedit Proposed bug fix. (In reply to Robert Wing from comment #6) You have correctly identified the problem. My change simply moves the bufin= it() even earlier to ensure that other early calls to ckfini() do not fail in the same way. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From nobody Wed May 19 21:36:01 2021 X-Original-To: fs@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00CFC8B7E2C for ; Wed, 19 May 2021 21:36:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FlmQ96b4qz4mcn for ; Wed, 19 May 2021 21:36:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA32F1A1B8 for ; Wed, 19 May 2021 21:36:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 14JLa1AA090774 for ; Wed, 19 May 2021 21:36:01 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from bugzilla@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 14JLa1Ba090773 for fs@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 19 May 2021 21:36:01 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: bugzilla set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: fs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 255979] fsck bad inode number 2 (256) to nextinode Date: Wed, 19 May 2021 21:36:01 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: bin X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: commit-hook@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: fs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Filesystems List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-fs List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-fs@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D255979 --- Comment #3 from commit-hook@FreeBSD.org --- A commit in branch main references this bug: URL: https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/src/commit/?id=3Dfe815b88b553667c40353c46b58f9779e= fa3570e commit fe815b88b553667c40353c46b58f9779efa3570e Author: Kirk McKusick AuthorDate: 2021-05-19 21:38:21 +0000 Commit: Kirk McKusick CommitDate: 2021-05-19 21:39:24 +0000 Fix fsck_ffs Pass 1b error exit "bad inode number 256 to nextinode". Pass 1b of fsck_ffs runs only when Pass 1 has found duplicate blocks. Pass 1 only knows that a block is duplicate when it finds the second instance of its use. The role of Pass 1b is to find the first use of all the duplicate blocks. It makes a pass over the cylinder groups looking for these blocks. When moving to the next cylinder group, Pass 1b failed to properly calculate the starting inode number for the cylinder group resulting in the above error message when it tried to read the first inode in the cylinder group. Reported by: Px Tested by: Px PR: 255979 MFC after: 3 days Sponsored by: Netflix sbin/fsck_ffs/pass1b.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From nobody Wed May 19 21:46:01 2021 X-Original-To: fs@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8396F8BDDE0 for ; Wed, 19 May 2021 21:46:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Flmdj2VNkz4rZZ for ; Wed, 19 May 2021 21:46:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E4E31A3B7 for ; Wed, 19 May 2021 21:46:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 14JLk16o097063 for ; Wed, 19 May 2021 21:46:01 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 14JLk13D097062 for fs@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 19 May 2021 21:46:01 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: fs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 255979] fsck bad inode number 2 (256) to nextinode Date: Wed, 19 May 2021 21:46:01 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: bin X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: mckusick@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: fs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Filesystems List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-fs List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-fs@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D255979 Kirk McKusick changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|New |In Progress --- Comment #4 from Kirk McKusick --- (In reply to Px from comment #2) Thanks for testing and confirming the fix. I will MFC it to stable/13 and stable/12 after it has had the required 3-day minimum waiting period in the development head. Your comprehensive bug report made it easy to find and fix. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From nobody Wed May 19 22:09:13 2021 X-Original-To: fs@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A04C626A36 for ; Wed, 19 May 2021 22:09:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Fln8V3RDrz3JTP for ; Wed, 19 May 2021 22:09:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E8ED1A899 for ; Wed, 19 May 2021 22:09:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 14JM9Eix006027 for ; Wed, 19 May 2021 22:09:14 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 14JM9E1v006026 for fs@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 19 May 2021 22:09:14 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: fs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 255473] Infinite writes on UFS with SU+J filesystem Date: Wed, 19 May 2021 22:09:13 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: mckusick@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: fs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Filesystems List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-fs List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-fs@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D255473 --- Comment #18 from Kirk McKusick --- (In reply to Jack from comment #17) Is it possible for you to try applying the patch described in https://reviews.freebsd.org/D30041 It is attempting to mitigate the problem that you are experiencing when run= ning with soft updates journaling. It would still be useful to know if disabling journaling is helpful because= if it is then it validates that the fix in D30041 is a useful idea to pursue. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From nobody Wed May 19 22:25:01 2021 X-Original-To: fs@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81A618BC4E8 for ; Wed, 19 May 2021 22:25:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FlnVj3Bcsz3jsf for ; Wed, 19 May 2021 22:25:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 560131AC98 for ; Wed, 19 May 2021 22:25:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 14JMP17R018446 for ; Wed, 19 May 2021 22:25:01 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 14JMP13r018445 for fs@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 19 May 2021 22:25:01 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: fs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 255473] Infinite writes on UFS with SU+J filesystem Date: Wed, 19 May 2021 22:25:01 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: xxjack12xx@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: fs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Filesystems List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-fs List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-fs@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D255473 --- Comment #19 from Jack --- (In reply to Kirk McKusick from comment #18) I can apply the patch. So far the system hasn't hung yet so I haven't neede= d to reboot it. The random hangs makes it hard to tell when it will show itself unfortunately. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From nobody Thu May 20 07:10:25 2021 X-Original-To: fs@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E5638B240C for ; Thu, 20 May 2021 07:10:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Fm18x2STCz4pBt for ; Thu, 20 May 2021 07:10:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 36794218E7 for ; Thu, 20 May 2021 07:10:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 14K7APdN078302 for ; Thu, 20 May 2021 07:10:25 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 14K7APYZ078301 for fs@FreeBSD.org; Thu, 20 May 2021 07:10:25 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: fs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 255979] fsck bad inode number 2 (256) to nextinode Date: Thu, 20 May 2021 07:10:25 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: bin X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: forums@px.in.ua X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: fs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Filesystems List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-fs List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-fs@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D255979 --- Comment #5 from Px --- Thanks again for the quick fix :) --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From nobody Thu May 20 10:25:30 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-fs@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDD518B2BD9 for ; Thu, 20 May 2021 10:25:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steven@multiplay.co.uk) Received: from mail-io1-xd2f.google.com (mail-io1-xd2f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2f]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Fm5VZ0MYGz3s8C for ; Thu, 20 May 2021 10:25:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steven@multiplay.co.uk) Received: by mail-io1-xd2f.google.com with SMTP id a8so7934942ioa.12 for ; Thu, 20 May 2021 03:25:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=multiplay-co-uk.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=yLz7iZxh9r2dq8XYU+qafLJ1Cjord3htyiaJuxFQqMc=; b=A+j3eD0WtNyBxdYy4PrV+cI+qQOyh0JW8wtaiHBMyqTdE8w/XlC9XbtvK0SJZoWavx XF5iAoOpsoy/3J+ba4lOBicOpUO/RIwLD61vz0z32l6PdNQZhZjNJrTq9aSWVE/exDVH RDWLL2cFgfRrod5xMGtAYIz+0EmeAL0xlXb64fHLXFsPIrxkndDHJiJuaNgsZ7rLhb5U f/q5cPu2cFQ74KuBCaZ7o+XEaAA44/MMs8SBhrQj6ZExBttT7doZr+DwvBaFNEc/t+x7 HT+xj5NKck/w5bWsUOfVd0ozxX3wffkUMy7SWx9KzAeKNvoRbv3CgjuQwXsf+Yz1Ky8o sBog== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=yLz7iZxh9r2dq8XYU+qafLJ1Cjord3htyiaJuxFQqMc=; b=mNOzp3UpB9sGEKdkNY8B0vAlm89ukLWReK3oKfoTGu4NFp3FgO48hp+f41EMAuEdk0 Kgv+2y60QTqn1Hsa+XaLI53dfwjKK6EDC0OR/oKdO8mo/Fb/rQ43I0Eq9IuSDHO4duTx fZStP5+mrGJEnAvr3ntaUlM2wbfnqzMq8fSErOx6deDQH34R1HFqZwun0UYgWRalnOwS JT+JCGjY/H7VkU75ujHZI+8zx3vYrfJe4Q134LYgKKOyX7gPqY75jLzok96xQdJDa1KX jtlbHuujJbOPki9kdBx8uDWBIn8MqYpfy6AS9IXpLBVZtxfTlpw1J6569eB+Gfn7ad4i p3+w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530vf9gfCphEB9UtEHW9xATdzm0oK0+9z4hVAAPYzkdjasDWWpSV WRfcIWbFdSiJaDwGW7oeQJBVHrnJx0x76Q+lnVrq3Q== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzdip7UmespzGGLMs24+fg0c4pCBg2RV/z4D3Jnb8Moc4O0pe7/W3ODGX9AkBjNXX1LJgMt+jX36MJNvLad1Zc= X-Received: by 2002:a6b:6c0b:: with SMTP id a11mr4742150ioh.37.1621506356557; Thu, 20 May 2021 03:25:56 -0700 (PDT) List-Id: Filesystems List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-fs List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-fs@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <866d6937-a4e8-bec3-d61b-07df3065fca9@sentex.net> In-Reply-To: From: Steven Hartland Date: Thu, 20 May 2021 11:25:30 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: speeding up zfs send | recv (update) To: mike tancsa Cc: Alan Somers , freebsd-fs Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000624b2305c2c05e06" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Fm5VZ0MYGz3s8C X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=multiplay-co-uk.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=A+j3eD0W; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=multiplay.co.uk; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of steven@multiplay.co.uk designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2f as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=steven@multiplay.co.uk X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.70 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[multiplay-co-uk.20150623.gappssmtp.com:s=20150623]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36:c]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-fs@freebsd.org]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2f:from:127.0.2.255]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[multiplay-co-uk.20150623.gappssmtp.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[multiplay.co.uk,none]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2f:from]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[killing@multiplay.co.uk,steven@multiplay.co.uk]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2f:from]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[killing@multiplay.co.uk,steven@multiplay.co.uk]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-fs]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] --000000000000624b2305c2c05e06 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" What is your pool structure / disk types? On Mon, 17 May 2021 at 16:58, mike tancsa wrote: > On 5/13/2021 11:37 AM, Alan Somers wrote: > > On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 8:45 AM mike tancsa > > wrote: > > > > For offsite storage, I have been doing a zfs send across a 10G > > link and > > noticed something I don't understand with respect to speed. I have a > > > > > > Is this a high latency link? ZFS send streams can be bursty. Piping > > the stream through mbuffer helps with that. Just google "zfs send > > mbuffer" for some examples. And be aware that your speed may be > > limited by the sender. Especially if those small files are randomly > > spread across the platter, your sending server's disks may be the > > limiting factor. Use gstat to check. > > -Alan > > > Just a quick follow up. I was doing some tests with just mbuffer, > mbuffer and ssh, and just ssh (aes128-gcm) with an compressed stream and > non compressed stream (zfs send vs zfs send -c). Generally, didnt find > too much of a difference. I was testing on a production server that is > generally uniformly busy, so it wont be 100% reliable, but I think close > enough as there is not much variance in the back ground load nor in the > results. > > I tried this both with datasets that were backups of mailspools, so LOTS > of little files and big directories as well as with zfs datasets with a > few big files. > > On the mail spool just via mbuffer (no ssh involved at all) > > zfs send > summary: 514 GiByte in 1h 09min 35.9sec - average of 126 MiB/s > zfs send -c > summary: 418 GiByte in 1h 05min 58.5sec - average of 108 MiB/s > > and the same dataset, sending just through OpenSSH took 1h:06m (zfs > send) and 1h:01m (zfs send -c) > > > On the large dataset (large VMDK files), similar pattern. I did find one > interesting thing, when I was testing with a smaller dataset of just > 12G. As the server has 65G of ram, 29 allocated to ARC, sending a zfs > stream with -c made a giant difference. I guess there is some efficiency > with sending something thats already compressed in arc ? Or maybe its > just all cache effect. > > Testing with one with about 1TB of referenced data using mbuffer with > and without ssh and just ssh > > zfs send with mbuffer and ssh > summary: 772 GiByte in 51min 06.2sec - average of 258 MiB/s > zfs send -c > summary: 772 GiByte in 1h 22min 09.3sec - average of 160 MiB/s > > And the same dataset just with ssh -- zfs send 53min and zfs send -c 55min > > and just mbuffer (no ssh) > > summary: 772 GiByte in 56min 45.7sec - average of 232 MiB/s (zfs send -c) > summary: 1224 GiByte in 53min 20.4sec - average of 392 MiB/s (zfs send) > > This seems to imply the disk is the bottleneck. mbuffer doesnt seem to > make much of a difference either way. Straight up ssh looks to be fine > / best. > > Next step is going to allocate a pair of SSDs as special allocation > class vdevs to see if it starts to make a difference for all that > metadata. I guess I will have to send/resend the datasets to make sure > they make full use of the special vdevs > > ----Mike > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-fs@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-fs-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > --000000000000624b2305c2c05e06 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
What is your pool structure / disk types?

On Mon, 17 May 20= 21 at 16:58, mike tancsa <mike@sentex= .net> wrote:
On 5/13/2021 11:37 AM, Alan Somers wrote:
> On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 8:45 AM mike tancsa <mike@sentex.net
> <mailto:mike@s= entex.net>> wrote:
>
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0For offsite storage, I have been doing a zfs send a= cross a 10G
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0link and
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0noticed something I don't understand with respe= ct to speed.=C2=A0 I have a
>
>
> Is this a high latency link?=C2=A0 ZFS send streams can be bursty.=C2= =A0 Piping
> the stream through mbuffer helps with that.=C2=A0 Just google "zf= s send
> mbuffer" for some examples.=C2=A0 And be aware that your speed ma= y be
> limited by the sender.=C2=A0 Especially if those small files are rando= mly
> spread across the platter, your sending server's disks may be the<= br> > limiting factor.=C2=A0 Use gstat to check.
> -Alan


Just a quick follow up.=C2=A0 I was doing some tests with just mbuffer,
mbuffer and ssh, and just ssh (aes128-gcm) with an compressed stream and non compressed stream (zfs send vs zfs send -c).=C2=A0 Generally, didnt fin= d
too much of a difference.=C2=A0 I was testing on a production server that i= s
generally uniformly busy, so it wont be 100% reliable, but I think close enough as there is not much variance in the back ground load nor in the
results.

I tried this both with datasets that were backups of mailspools, so LOTS of little files and big directories as well as with zfs datasets with a
few big files.=C2=A0

On the mail spool just via mbuffer (no ssh involved at all)

zfs send
summary:=C2=A0 514 GiByte in 1h 09min 35.9sec - average of=C2=A0 126 MiB/s<= br> zfs send -c
summary:=C2=A0 418 GiByte in 1h 05min 58.5sec - average of=C2=A0 108 MiB/s<= br>
and the same dataset, sending just through OpenSSH took 1h:06m (zfs
send) and 1h:01m (zfs send -c)


On the large dataset (large VMDK files), similar pattern. I did find one interesting thing, when I was testing with a smaller dataset of just
12G.=C2=A0 As the server has 65G of ram, 29 allocated to ARC, sending a zfs=
stream with -c made a giant difference. I guess there is some efficiency with sending something thats already compressed in arc ? Or maybe its
just all cache effect.

Testing with one with about 1TB of referenced data using mbuffer with
and without ssh=C2=A0 and just ssh

zfs send with mbuffer and ssh
summary:=C2=A0 772 GiByte in 51min 06.2sec - average of=C2=A0 258 MiB/s
zfs send -c
summary:=C2=A0 772 GiByte in 1h 22min 09.3sec - average of=C2=A0 160 MiB/s<= br>
And the same dataset just with ssh -- zfs send 53min and zfs send -c 55min<= br>
and just mbuffer (no ssh)

summary:=C2=A0 772 GiByte in 56min 45.7sec - average of=C2=A0 232 MiB/s (zf= s send -c)
summary: 1224 GiByte in 53min 20.4sec - average of=C2=A0 392 MiB/s (zfs sen= d)

This seems to imply the disk is the bottleneck. mbuffer doesnt seem to
make much of a difference either way.=C2=A0 Straight up ssh looks to be fin= e
/ best.

Next step is going to allocate a pair of SSDs as special allocation
class vdevs to see if it starts to make a difference for all that
metadata. I guess I will have to send/resend the datasets to make sure
they make full use of the special vdevs

=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 ----Mike


_______________________________________________
freebsd-fs@free= bsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/free= bsd-fs
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-fs-unsubscribe@freebsd.org&= quot;
--000000000000624b2305c2c05e06-- From nobody Thu May 20 11:03:37 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-fs@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F4BF8C9826 for ; Thu, 20 May 2021 11:03:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from pyroxene2a.sentex.ca (pyroxene19.sentex.ca [IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:3::19]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "pyroxene.sentex.ca", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Fm6L319HQz4cth; Thu, 20 May 2021 11:03:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from [IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:4:5946:38b4:5bfe:1950] ([IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:4:5946:38b4:5bfe:1950]) by pyroxene2a.sentex.ca (8.16.1/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 14KB3bTn054095 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 20 May 2021 07:03:37 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Subject: Re: speeding up zfs send | recv (update) To: Steven Hartland Cc: Alan Somers , freebsd-fs References: <866d6937-a4e8-bec3-d61b-07df3065fca9@sentex.net> From: mike tancsa Message-ID: <17763650-53b9-c2af-e14e-5d66f6ae69a1@sentex.net> Date: Thu, 20 May 2021 07:03:37 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.2 List-Id: Filesystems List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-fs List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-fs@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Fm6L319HQz4cth X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[] On 5/20/2021 6:25 AM, Steven Hartland wrote: > What is your pool structure / disk types? > Sending side a pair of raidz1 pools of HDDs. I have added the special drives (SSDs) to see if it will help speed up the transfer as well as speed up listing of snapshots.         zbackup2                                                        ONLINE       0     0     0           raidz1-0                                                      ONLINE       0     0     0             diskid/DISK-VK0BGRPY%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20p1  ONLINE       0     0     0             diskid/DISK-VK0BDWVY%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20p1  ONLINE       0     0     0             diskid/DISK-VK0BHAJY%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20p1  ONLINE       0     0     0             diskid/DISK-VK0SM9EY%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20p1  ONLINE       0     0     0           raidz1-1                                                      ONLINE       0     0     0             diskid/DISK-VDJ5V2BD%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20p1  ONLINE       0     0     0             diskid/DISK-VDJ7URTK%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20p1  ONLINE       0     0     0             diskid/DISK-VDJ7K44D%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20p1  ONLINE       0     0     0             diskid/DISK-VDJ7UUVK%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20p1  ONLINE       0     0     0         special           mirror-2                                                      ONLINE       0     0     0             ada0p2                                                      ONLINE       0     0     0             ada1p2                                                      ONLINE       0     0     0         cache           nvd0p2                                                        ONLINE       0     0     0  pool: zbackup1  state: ONLINE   scan: scrub repaired 0 in 1 days 00:06:09 with 0 errors on Thu Apr 30 13:57:45 2020 config:         NAME                                                            STATE     READ WRITE CKSUM         zbackup1                                                        ONLINE       0     0     0           raidz1-0                                                      ONLINE       0     0     0             diskid/DISK-VAGGPZKL%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20p1  ONLINE       0     0     0             da1p1                                                       ONLINE       0     0     0             diskid/DISK-VAJ0S1DL%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20p1  ONLINE       0     0     0             diskid/DISK-VAHZRMSL%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20p1  ONLINE       0     0     0             da4p1                                                       ONLINE       0     0     0         special           mirror-1                                                      ONLINE       0     0     0             ada0p1                                                      ONLINE       0     0     0             ada1p1                                                      ONLINE       0     0     0         cache           nvd0p1                                                        ONLINE       0     0     0 From nobody Thu May 20 12:02:15 2021 X-Original-To: fs@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 053DB621ED4 for ; Thu, 20 May 2021 12:02:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Fm7dg5cNpz3KDS for ; Thu, 20 May 2021 12:02:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A077525AB2 for ; Thu, 20 May 2021 12:02:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 14KC2FAi026582 for ; Thu, 20 May 2021 12:02:15 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 14KC2FwC026581 for fs@FreeBSD.org; Thu, 20 May 2021 12:02:15 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: fs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 256024] [zfs] `zpool upgrade' doesn't warn about updating bootloader anymore Date: Thu, 20 May 2021 12:02:15 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: bin X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: linimon@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: fs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: assigned_to Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Filesystems List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-fs List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-fs@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D256024 Mark Linimon changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|bugs@FreeBSD.org |fs@FreeBSD.org --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From nobody Thu May 20 12:12:07 2021 X-Original-To: fs@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7DD38B1EA0 for ; Thu, 20 May 2021 12:12:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Fm7sF647vz3Pll for ; Thu, 20 May 2021 12:12:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3AA1425BF2 for ; Thu, 20 May 2021 12:12:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 14KCC7UK034221 for ; Thu, 20 May 2021 12:12:07 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 14KCC7WB034220 for fs@FreeBSD.org; Thu, 20 May 2021 12:12:07 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: fs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 256024] [zfs] `zpool upgrade' doesn't warn about updating bootloader anymore Date: Thu, 20 May 2021 12:12:07 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: bin X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: fuz@fuz.su X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: fs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Filesystems List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-fs List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-fs@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D256024 Robert Clausecker changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fuz@fuz.su --- Comment #2 from Robert Clausecker --- Got bitten by this badly last weekend when I upgraded the root pool of my 1= 2.2 -> 13.0 install. Didn't wanna boot anymore. Had to manually repartition to enlarge the 700 kB ESP to a size that suites the new boot loader. Not fun = at all. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From nobody Fri May 21 07:31:25 2021 X-Original-To: fs@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61D5D625B17 for ; Fri, 21 May 2021 07:31:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FmdZj2BMCz3FxD for ; Fri, 21 May 2021 07:31:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 34CD854C3 for ; Fri, 21 May 2021 07:31:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 14L7VPvl029505 for ; Fri, 21 May 2021 07:31:25 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 14L7VPSH029497 for fs@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 21 May 2021 07:31:25 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: fs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 256024] [zfs] `zpool upgrade' doesn't warn about updating bootloader anymore Date: Fri, 21 May 2021 07:31:25 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: bin X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: grahamperrin@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: fs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Filesystems List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-fs List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-fs@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D256024 Graham Perrin changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |grahamperrin@gmail.com --- Comment #3 from Graham Perrin --- Parallel discussion:=20 (In reply to Robert Clausecker from comment #2) > 12.2 -> 13.0 Release notes were overlooked.=20 =20 there's a red alert box referring to=20 --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From nobody Fri May 21 07:46:04 2021 X-Original-To: fs@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 075D18BB0ED for ; Fri, 21 May 2021 07:46:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Fmdvc6hxCz3QF3 for ; Fri, 21 May 2021 07:46:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA3B45893 for ; Fri, 21 May 2021 07:46:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 14L7k49m035624 for ; Fri, 21 May 2021 07:46:04 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 14L7k4bp035623 for fs@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 21 May 2021 07:46:04 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: fs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 256024] [zfs] `zpool upgrade' doesn't warn about updating bootloader anymore Date: Fri, 21 May 2021 07:46:04 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: bin X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: grembo@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: fs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Filesystems List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-fs List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-fs@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D256024 --- Comment #4 from Michael Gmelin --- (In reply to Graham Perrin from comment #3) > Release notes were overlooked.=20 >=20 > =20 > there's a red alert box referring to=20 > Just for clarity's sake, both of these locations don't contain anything specific about ZFS and/or zpool upgrade. They only and specifically talk ab= out EFI System Partitions and efibootmgr(8). Therefore they don't relate to thi= s PR beyond the fact that they both are about booting. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From nobody Fri May 21 07:52:05 2021 X-Original-To: fs@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33AE68BD789 for ; Fri, 21 May 2021 07:52:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Fmf2Y0cjSz3hNX for ; Fri, 21 May 2021 07:52:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F11A35263 for ; Fri, 21 May 2021 07:52:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 14L7q4ga037763 for ; Fri, 21 May 2021 07:52:04 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 14L7q4Hh037762 for fs@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 21 May 2021 07:52:04 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: fs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 256024] [zfs] `zpool upgrade' doesn't warn about updating bootloader anymore Date: Fri, 21 May 2021 07:52:05 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: bin X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: grahamperrin@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: fs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Filesystems List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-fs List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-fs@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D256024 --- Comment #5 from Graham Perrin --- Cross reference: documentation bug 255318 for the FreeBSD Handbook.=20 ---- (In reply to Michael Gmelin from comment #0) If I'm not mistaken, neither=20 nor=20 covers EFI use cases.=20 We have loader(8)=20 =20 and gpart (8)=20 =20 however, these pages are long enough that some readers might not grasp the context and essence of what's required. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From nobody Fri May 21 07:53:33 2021 X-Original-To: fs@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B40F8BEE48 for ; Fri, 21 May 2021 07:53:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Fmf4F1Pvnz3jhn for ; Fri, 21 May 2021 07:53:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 193F459D4 for ; Fri, 21 May 2021 07:53:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 14L7rXuR039646 for ; Fri, 21 May 2021 07:53:33 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 14L7rXei039645 for fs@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 21 May 2021 07:53:33 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: fs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 229595] zpool upgrade should substitute disk and partition numbers in gpart instructions Date: Fri, 21 May 2021 07:53:33 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: bin X-Bugzilla-Version: CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: grahamperrin@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: fs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Filesystems List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-fs List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-fs@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D229595 --- Comment #1 from Graham Perrin --- Cross-reference: documentation bug 255318 for the FreeBSD Handbook. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From nobody Fri May 21 08:01:54 2021 X-Original-To: fs@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA1668C28B3 for ; Fri, 21 May 2021 08:01:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FmfFt5mNkz3mQn for ; Fri, 21 May 2021 08:01:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AE6755AB3 for ; Fri, 21 May 2021 08:01:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 14L81sf5043012 for ; Fri, 21 May 2021 08:01:54 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 14L81seG043011 for fs@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 21 May 2021 08:01:54 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: fs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 256024] [zfs] `zpool upgrade' doesn't warn about updating bootloader anymore Date: Fri, 21 May 2021 08:01:54 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: bin X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: grembo@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: fs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Filesystems List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-fs List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-fs@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D256024 --- Comment #6 from Michael Gmelin --- (In reply to Graham Perrin from comment #5) You wrote > Release notes were overlooked.=20 >=20 > =20 > there's a red alert box referring to=20 > And neither of these two locations talks about anything else than EFI. This PR is not about claiming that there is no documentation about how to install the boot loader. It's about the warning after "zpool upgrade" that disappeared and if 1. We could add an errata note warning about that (so people are aware). 2. If we could bring back a similar warning back. Someone reading the gpart man page is probably already aware that there's something to do (and depending on how experienced they are, might read that= man page on a different device while trying to figure out how to make that mach= ine they just updated boot again). --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From nobody Fri May 21 08:10:03 2021 X-Original-To: fs@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DF178C8875 for ; Fri, 21 May 2021 08:10:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FmfRH1Cx2z3rLP for ; Fri, 21 May 2021 08:10:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 128905AC6 for ; Fri, 21 May 2021 08:10:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 14L8A3XL047618 for ; Fri, 21 May 2021 08:10:03 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 14L8A3JQ047617 for fs@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 21 May 2021 08:10:03 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: fs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 256024] [zfs] `zpool upgrade' doesn't warn about updating bootloader anymore Date: Fri, 21 May 2021 08:10:03 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: bin X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: fuz@fuz.su X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: fs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Filesystems List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-fs List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-fs@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D256024 --- Comment #7 from Robert Clausecker --- (In reply to Graham Perrin from comment #3) Curiously enough I did read the release notes, just forgot about them when upgrading the server. And it only failed once I had upgraded the root pool= a few weeks later and then rebooted the server. A warning on zpool upgrade w= ould have helped me a great deal. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From nobody Fri May 21 08:27:20 2021 X-Original-To: fs@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A464A625809 for ; Fri, 21 May 2021 08:27:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FmfqD498gz4T1N for ; Fri, 21 May 2021 08:27:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 721BC5F9A for ; Fri, 21 May 2021 08:27:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 14L8RKCu058575 for ; Fri, 21 May 2021 08:27:20 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 14L8RKds058574 for fs@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 21 May 2021 08:27:20 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: fs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 256024] [zfs] `zpool upgrade' doesn't warn about updating bootloader anymore Date: Fri, 21 May 2021 08:27:20 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: bin X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: grahamperrin@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: fs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Filesystems List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-fs List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-fs@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D256024 --- Comment #8 from Graham Perrin --- (In reply to Michael Gmelin from comment #6) For what it's worth: I'm one of a number of people who read the release not= es, but misinterpreted some part(s). I sort of read between the lines and drew false conclusions.=20 ---- A big +1 to having a concise alert at pool upgrade time. Ideally (if possible), have the alert _prior_ to completion of the command, although =E2=80=A6=20 zpool-upgrade(8) =E2=80=A6 I'm not aware of anything like dry-run in this context and (sorry= ) I don't have handy a pool with which I can experiment. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From nobody Fri May 21 09:06:36 2021 X-Original-To: fs@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02A248CA588 for ; Fri, 21 May 2021 09:06:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FmghW6X2Mz4mmy for ; Fri, 21 May 2021 09:06:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C966B66AB for ; Fri, 21 May 2021 09:06:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 14L96ZK4077982 for ; Fri, 21 May 2021 09:06:35 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 14L96ZQP077981 for fs@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 21 May 2021 09:06:35 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: fs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 256024] [zfs] `zpool upgrade' doesn't warn about updating bootloader anymore Date: Fri, 21 May 2021 09:06:36 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: bin X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: pi@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: fs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Filesystems List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-fs List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-fs@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D256024 --- Comment #9 from Kurt Jaeger --- (In reply to Graham Perrin from comment #8) I'm also one of those who really miss the warning and would appreciate if we had some guide for the not-so-technical user-base. Let me assure you, debian/Linux has the same problem as I currently have one server that runs, but will probably fail to reboot, because, they, too, had no safety / warnings on zpool upgrade 8-} --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From nobody Fri May 21 09:46:30 2021 X-Original-To: fs@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B7588BC7B1 for ; Fri, 21 May 2021 09:46:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FmhZZ0yFgz3KZx for ; Fri, 21 May 2021 09:46:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F238F70C6 for ; Fri, 21 May 2021 09:46:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 14L9kTUS095624 for ; Fri, 21 May 2021 09:46:29 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 14L9kTVS095623 for fs@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 21 May 2021 09:46:29 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: fs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 256024] [zfs] `zpool upgrade' doesn't warn about updating bootloader anymore Date: Fri, 21 May 2021 09:46:30 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: bin X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: martin@lispworks.com X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: fs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Filesystems List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-fs List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-fs@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D256024 martin@lispworks.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |martin@lispworks.com --- Comment #10 from martin@lispworks.com --- Why not just update the boot loader at the same time as you update the OS? = It might contain useful bug fixes. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From nobody Fri May 21 10:18:40 2021 X-Original-To: fs@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A71B8B472A for ; Fri, 21 May 2021 10:18:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FmjHj08Fjz3pkj for ; Fri, 21 May 2021 10:18:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E200572E3 for ; Fri, 21 May 2021 10:18:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 14LAIegM013184 for ; Fri, 21 May 2021 10:18:40 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 14LAIeau013183 for fs@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 21 May 2021 10:18:40 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: fs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 256024] [zfs] `zpool upgrade' doesn't warn about updating bootloader anymore Date: Fri, 21 May 2021 10:18:40 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: bin X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: ronald-lists@klop.ws X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: fs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Filesystems List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-fs List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-fs@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D256024 Ronald Klop changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ronald-lists@klop.ws --- Comment #11 from Ronald Klop --- My upgrade script does something like this: (pseudocode for brevity) PART=3D/dev/ada0p1 BOOTFILE=3D/boot/gptzfsboot FILESIZE=3D$( stat -f "%z" $BOOTFILE ) CURBOOT_MD5=3D`head -c $FILESIZE $PART | md5 -q /dev/stdin` NEWBOOT_MD5=3D`md5 -q $BOOTFILE` if CURBOOT_MD5 !=3D NEWBOOT_MD5; then echo "Upgrade your bootblocks." echo "gpart bootcode -b /boot/pmbr -p /boot/gptzfsboot -i 1 $PART" fi This can probably made more general. Just my 2 cents. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From nobody Fri May 21 10:49:52 2021 X-Original-To: fs@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C0878C8AE4 for ; Fri, 21 May 2021 10:49:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Fmjzg6S0lz4XWB for ; Fri, 21 May 2021 10:49:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF9E27BB1 for ; Fri, 21 May 2021 10:49:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 14LAnpd8027709 for ; Fri, 21 May 2021 10:49:51 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 14LAnpkY027708 for fs@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 21 May 2021 10:49:51 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: fs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 256024] [zfs] `zpool upgrade' doesn't warn about updating bootloader anymore Date: Fri, 21 May 2021 10:49:52 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: bin X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: fuz@fuz.su X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: fs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Filesystems List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-fs List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-fs@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D256024 --- Comment #12 from Robert Clausecker --- (In reply to martin from comment #10) I don't understand either why freebsd-update(8) doesn't have provisions for that. It doesn't even print an excerpt of the release notes warning people= to do that themselves. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From nobody Fri May 21 11:02:36 2021 X-Original-To: fs@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A308D6226D0 for ; Fri, 21 May 2021 11:02:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FmkGN447Bz4dgQ for ; Fri, 21 May 2021 11:02:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7537D7EF8 for ; Fri, 21 May 2021 11:02:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 14LB2aAZ036531 for ; Fri, 21 May 2021 11:02:36 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 14LB2aBq036530 for fs@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 21 May 2021 11:02:36 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: fs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 256024] [zfs] `zpool upgrade' doesn't warn about updating bootloader anymore Date: Fri, 21 May 2021 11:02:36 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: bin X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: grembo@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: fs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Filesystems List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-fs List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-fs@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D256024 --- Comment #13 from Michael Gmelin --- (In reply to Robert Clausecker from comment #12) Because freebsd-update doesn't upgrade your zpool. So reinstalling the boot loader isn't necessary after running freebsd-update. Typical scheme for me: 1. Update FreeBSD. 2. Keep pools as they are, to make sure the release works well and existing rescue images, other machines etc., can mount them easily. 3. A few weeks or even months later, run "zpool upgrade". That last step is the point where the warning makes sense (and that's why it was there). --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From nobody Fri May 21 12:10:00 2021 X-Original-To: fs@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E2868BA836 for ; Fri, 21 May 2021 12:10:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Fmlm91zxZz3R7w for ; Fri, 21 May 2021 12:10:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C36E11297 for ; Fri, 21 May 2021 12:10:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 14LCA1pN065098 for ; Fri, 21 May 2021 12:10:01 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 14LCA1Md065097 for fs@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 21 May 2021 12:10:01 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: fs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 256024] [zfs] `zpool upgrade' doesn't warn about updating bootloader anymore Date: Fri, 21 May 2021 12:10:00 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: bin X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: stephan@lichtenauer.co.za X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: fs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Filesystems List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-fs List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-fs@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D256024 stephan@lichtenauer.co.za changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |stephan@lichtenauer.co.za --- Comment #14 from stephan@lichtenauer.co.za --- But it doesn't hurt to (optionally) upgrade the bootloader directly after t= he update, does it?=20 Even if somebody upgrades the zpool only later on (or never) a new bootload= er ensures that *if* the upgrade happens at some point, the system still boots= at all times. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From nobody Fri May 21 12:21:17 2021 X-Original-To: fs@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CF448C3F90 for ; Fri, 21 May 2021 12:21:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Fmm1B6mpPz3n42 for ; Fri, 21 May 2021 12:21:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BC90C1141C for ; Fri, 21 May 2021 12:21:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 14LCLIYn073221 for ; Fri, 21 May 2021 12:21:18 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 14LCLIfx073220 for fs@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 21 May 2021 12:21:18 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: fs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 256024] [zfs] `zpool upgrade' doesn't warn about updating bootloader anymore Date: Fri, 21 May 2021 12:21:17 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: bin X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: grembo@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: fs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Filesystems List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-fs List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-fs@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D256024 --- Comment #15 from Michael Gmelin --- (In reply to stephan from comment #14) Assuming the boot loader stays compatible with previous zpool versions it wouldn't hurt - at least if freebsd-update can actually reliably determine = the bootloader setup used (e.g., label the boot partitions of *all* driver containing the boot pool, not just the first one and then not be able to bo= ot in case one of the drives dies, and also not drives not used for booting, including removable media). Being able to do it in cases where it's clear cut and warn in other cases t= hat it might need to be done manually, might be a start - and of course realize= all the cases in which freebsd-update is run on something that doesn't involve = the bootloader, e.g., updating jails. There's a lot of potential for breaking things in the process though. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From nobody Fri May 21 20:39:36 2021 X-Original-To: fs@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3F528BD1F6 for ; Fri, 21 May 2021 20:39:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Fmz484VM4z3RB1 for ; Fri, 21 May 2021 20:39:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 82B3117DEB for ; Fri, 21 May 2021 20:39:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 14LKdaoB027129 for ; Fri, 21 May 2021 20:39:36 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from bugzilla@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 14LKda6q027128 for fs@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 21 May 2021 20:39:36 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: bugzilla set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: fs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 255979] fsck bad inode number 2 (256) to nextinode Date: Fri, 21 May 2021 20:39:36 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: bin X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: commit-hook@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: fs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Filesystems List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-fs List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-fs@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D255979 --- Comment #6 from commit-hook@FreeBSD.org --- A commit in branch main references this bug: URL: https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/src/commit/?id=3Df190f9193bc10a8193c87e0a02fa91400= e4eb159 commit f190f9193bc10a8193c87e0a02fa91400e4eb159 Author: Kirk McKusick AuthorDate: 2021-05-21 20:41:40 +0000 Commit: Kirk McKusick CommitDate: 2021-05-21 20:42:37 +0000 Fix fsck_ufs segfaults with gjournal (SU+J) The segfault was being hit in ckfini() (sbin/fsck_ffs/fsutil.c) while attempting to traverse the buffer cache to flush dirty buffers. The tail queue used for the buffer cache was not initialized before dropping into gjournal_check(). Move the buffer initialization earlier so that it has been done before calling gjournal_check(). Reported by: crypt47, nvass Fix by: Robert Wing Tested by: Robert Wing PR: 255030 PR: 255979 MFC after: 3 days Sponsored by: Netflix sbin/fsck_ffs/main.c | 1 + sbin/fsck_ffs/setup.c | 1 - 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From nobody Sat May 22 13:12:33 2021 X-Original-To: fs@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D21C8B3E84 for ; Sat, 22 May 2021 13:12:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FnP5v0kYqz4vks for ; Sat, 22 May 2021 13:12:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0292E25182 for ; Sat, 22 May 2021 13:12:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 14MDCYaf034792 for ; Sat, 22 May 2021 13:12:34 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 14MDCYnf034791 for fs@FreeBSD.org; Sat, 22 May 2021 13:12:34 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: fs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 256024] [zfs] `zpool upgrade' doesn't warn about updating bootloader anymore Date: Sat, 22 May 2021 13:12:33 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: bin X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: grembo@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: fs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Filesystems List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-fs List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-fs@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D256024 --- Comment #16 from Michael Gmelin --- Note that this has been reported upstream now. I just created a pull request, let's see where this goes: https://github.com/openzfs/zfs/pull/12104 --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From nobody Sat May 22 16:25:37 2021 X-Original-To: fs@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AEF78BAF2E for ; Sat, 22 May 2021 16:25:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FnTNd31VHz4XLt for ; Sat, 22 May 2021 16:25:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BC67277A6 for ; Sat, 22 May 2021 16:25:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 14MGPbNb041167 for ; Sat, 22 May 2021 16:25:37 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 14MGPb1c041166 for fs@FreeBSD.org; Sat, 22 May 2021 16:25:37 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: fs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 255979] fsck bad inode number 2 (256) to nextinode Date: Sat, 22 May 2021 16:25:37 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: bin X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: mckusick@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: fs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Filesystems List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-fs List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-fs@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D255979 --- Comment #7 from Kirk McKusick --- (In reply to commit-hook from comment #6) Commit f190f919 applies to bug 254709 and I cited it here by mistake. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From nobody Sat May 22 16:27:55 2021 X-Original-To: fs@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 825988BB524 for ; Sat, 22 May 2021 16:27:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FnTRH32mdz4Y58 for ; Sat, 22 May 2021 16:27:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CAB327907 for ; Sat, 22 May 2021 16:27:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 14MGRtVx041548 for ; Sat, 22 May 2021 16:27:55 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 14MGRtb0041547 for fs@FreeBSD.org; Sat, 22 May 2021 16:27:55 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: fs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 255979] fsck bad inode number 2 (256) to nextinode Date: Sat, 22 May 2021 16:27:55 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: bin X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: mckusick@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: fs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Filesystems List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-fs List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-fs@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D255979 --- Comment #8 from Kirk McKusick --- (In reply to Kirk McKusick from comment #7) Geez, I cannot even get the correction correct! Commit f190f919 applies to bug 245709 and I cited it here by mistake. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From nobody Sat May 22 16:36:33 2021 X-Original-To: fs@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC2418C2429 for ; Sat, 22 May 2021 16:36:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FnTdD5NM3z4dCX for ; Sat, 22 May 2021 16:36:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A14D9274F0 for ; Sat, 22 May 2021 16:36:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 14MGaWZN045736 for ; Sat, 22 May 2021 16:36:32 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 14MGaWCj045735 for fs@FreeBSD.org; Sat, 22 May 2021 16:36:32 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: fs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 255979] fsck bad inode number 2 (256) to nextinode Date: Sat, 22 May 2021 16:36:33 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: bin X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: mckusick@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: fs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Filesystems List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-fs List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-fs@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D255979 --- Comment #9 from Kirk McKusick --- (In reply to commit-hook from comment #6) Third time (plus an additional cup of coffee) is the charm. Commit f190f919 applies to bug 245907 and I cited it here by mistake. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From nobody Sat May 22 21:01:07 2021 X-Original-To: fs@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 640118B206F for ; Sat, 22 May 2021 21:01:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FnbVX27NFz4ksZ for ; Sat, 22 May 2021 21:01:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B0E02FDF for ; Sat, 22 May 2021 21:01:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 14ML18wJ088997 for ; Sat, 22 May 2021 21:01:08 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from bugzilla@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 14ML18XV088996 for fs@FreeBSD.org; Sat, 22 May 2021 21:01:08 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: bugzilla set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: fs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 255979] fsck bad inode number 2 (256) to nextinode Date: Sat, 22 May 2021 21:01:07 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: bin X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: commit-hook@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: fs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Filesystems List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-fs List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-fs@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D255979 --- Comment #10 from commit-hook@FreeBSD.org --- A commit in branch stable/13 references this bug: URL: https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/src/commit/?id=3De198c1dc8f6faaa85bd20990d15e3bcb9= d081873 commit e198c1dc8f6faaa85bd20990d15e3bcb9d081873 Author: Kirk McKusick AuthorDate: 2021-05-19 21:38:21 +0000 Commit: Kirk McKusick CommitDate: 2021-05-22 21:03:37 +0000 Fix fsck_ffs Pass 1b error exit "bad inode number 256 to nextinode". (cherry picked from commit fe815b88b553667c40353c46b58f9779efa3570e) PR: 255979 Sponsored by: Netflix sbin/fsck_ffs/pass1b.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From nobody Sat May 22 21:02:39 2021 X-Original-To: fs@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F47A8B40CC for ; Sat, 22 May 2021 21:02:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FnbXH0CrQz4m4K for ; Sat, 22 May 2021 21:02:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E3CCE3235 for ; Sat, 22 May 2021 21:02:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 14ML2cwg090862 for ; Sat, 22 May 2021 21:02:38 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 14ML2cxd090861 for fs@FreeBSD.org; Sat, 22 May 2021 21:02:38 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: fs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 255979] fsck bad inode number 2 (256) to nextinode Date: Sat, 22 May 2021 21:02:39 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: bin X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: mckusick@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: fs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Filesystems List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-fs List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-fs@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D255979 Kirk McKusick changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|In Progress |Closed Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #11 from Kirk McKusick --- This fix has been MFC'ed to 13-stable. It does not apply to 12-stable. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From nobody Sat May 22 23:52:26 2021 X-Original-To: fs@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C5588F63CB for ; Sat, 22 May 2021 23:52:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FngJC1lS0z3LwG for ; Sat, 22 May 2021 23:52:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 247025573 for ; Sat, 22 May 2021 23:52:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 14MNqR75081309 for ; Sat, 22 May 2021 23:52:27 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 14MNqRnp081308 for fs@FreeBSD.org; Sat, 22 May 2021 23:52:27 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: fs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 252821] UFS filesystem panics after deadlock during mksnap_ffs Date: Sat, 22 May 2021 23:52:26 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.2-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: panic X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: mckusick@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: fs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: resolution bug_status Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Filesystems List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-fs List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-fs@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D252821 Kirk McKusick changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|In Progress |Closed --- Comment #7 from Kirk McKusick --- The panic described in this report has been fixed in https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D253158. The buffer cache hanging was addressed in https://reviews.freebsd.org/D28901. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From nobody Sun May 23 16:36:04 2021 X-Original-To: fs@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 269B59F0B4A for ; Sun, 23 May 2021 16:36:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Fp5ZD0Nxqz3PYf for ; Sun, 23 May 2021 16:36:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E6CB71A856 for ; Sun, 23 May 2021 16:36:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 14NGa3Pq002980 for ; Sun, 23 May 2021 16:36:03 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 14NGa39q002979 for fs@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 23 May 2021 16:36:03 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: fs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 147881] [zfs] [patch] ZFS "sharenfs" doesn't allow different "exports" options for different hosts Date: Sun, 23 May 2021 16:36:04 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: Unspecified X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: sdalu@sdalu.com X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: fs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Filesystems List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-fs List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-fs@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D147881 St=C3=A9phane D'Alu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sdalu@sdalu.com --- Comment #19 from St=C3=A9phane D'Alu --- Do we have an official solution for that? Or is it abandoned ? --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From nobody Sun May 23 21:00:38 2021 X-Original-To: fs@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BA699E4994 for ; Sun, 23 May 2021 21:00:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FpCRZ40yyz3rPq for ; Sun, 23 May 2021 21:00:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EAB5B1E035 for ; Sun, 23 May 2021 21:00:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 14NL0cjT038527 for ; Sun, 23 May 2021 21:00:38 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from bugzilla@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 14NL0cq2038526 for fs@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 23 May 2021 21:00:38 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <202105232100.14NL0cq2038526@kenobi.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: bugzilla set sender to bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org To: fs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Problem reports for fs@FreeBSD.org that need special attention Date: Sun, 23 May 2021 21:00:38 +0000 List-Id: Filesystems List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-fs List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-fs@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="16218036386.Fce862.37373" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit --16218036386.Fce862.37373 Date: Sun, 23 May 2021 21:00:38 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" To view an individual PR, use: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=(Bug Id). The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users, which need special attention. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and obsolete releases. Status | Bug Id | Description ------------+-----------+--------------------------------------------------- New | 203492 | mount_unionfs -o below causes panic Open | 144447 | [zfs] sharenfs fsunshare() & fsshare_main() non f Open | 211491 | System hangs after "Uptime" on reboot with ZFS Open | 221909 | [ZFS] Add a sysctl to toggle send_corrupt_data Open | 237067 | ZFS: Crash in vdev_dtl_reassess when using GELI w Open | 240831 | zfs: Panic during snapshot on 12.1-STABLE r352648 Open | 243973 | [zfs] rollback segmentation fault Open | 244656 | zfs: resilver doesn't provide enough information Open | 244692 | gjournal: Does not support TRIM Open | 244899 | [PATCH] zfs: xattr on a symlink target > 136 caus Open | 251035 | [zfs] Allow 64 bit ZFS to support 32 bit ioctls ( 11 problems total for which you should take action. --16218036386.Fce862.37373 Date: Sun, 23 May 2021 21:00:38 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" 
The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users,
which need special attention. These represent problem reports covering
all versions including experimental development code and obsolete releases.

Status      |    Bug Id | Description
------------+-----------+---------------------------------------------------
New         |    203492 | mount_unionfs -o below causes panic
Open        |    144447 | [zfs] sharenfs fsunshare() & fsshare_main() non f
Open        |    211491 | System hangs after "Uptime" on reboot with ZFS
Open        |    221909 | [ZFS] Add a sysctl to toggle send_corrupt_data
Open        |    237067 | ZFS: Crash in vdev_dtl_reassess when using GELI w
Open        |    240831 | zfs: Panic during snapshot on 12.1-STABLE r352648
Open        |    243973 | [zfs] rollback segmentation fault
Open        |    244656 | zfs: resilver doesn't provide enough information 
Open        |    244692 | gjournal: Does not support TRIM
Open        |    244899 | [PATCH] zfs: xattr on a symlink target > 136 caus
Open        |    251035 | [zfs] Allow 64 bit ZFS to support 32 bit ioctls (

11 problems total for which you should take action.
--16218036386.Fce862.37373--