Date: Mon, 3 May 2021 14:11:59 +0300 From: Gleb Popov <arrowd@freebsd.org> To: Ryan Moeller <ryan@ixsystems.com> Cc: freebsd-hackers <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: ACLs are not reflected in FS extended attributes Message-ID: <CALH631mxQFPehpTqQBhuAsKW5vNiEN0MQ2kcyuY3mjSpcFUAiw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAGuotKB3-oLP05syFpQ%2B7%2B6ixeuSqBO5MC1ZpiAb%2BMNKyarh2g@mail.gmail.com> References: <CALH631m8bC5SoRhC1Q1X1%2BmN7tgT3Ti%2BTwhronSNZeX3Qn%2Bg-g@mail.gmail.com> <CAGuotKB3-oLP05syFpQ%2B7%2B6ixeuSqBO5MC1ZpiAb%2BMNKyarh2g@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 8:58 PM Ryan Moeller <ryan@ixsystems.com> wrote: > ACLs on FreeBSD are not exposed through extended attributes but rather > acl(9) interfaces in VFS implemented by each filesystem. There is a > good selection of library interfaces already in acl(3). > acl_extended_file(3) looks like it could be pretty much a convenience > wrapper around acl_is_trivial_np(3). Hope that helps point you in the > right direction! > > -Ryan > Thanks for your reply. Indeed, I used acl_is_trivial_np to implement this function and it seems to work!
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CALH631mxQFPehpTqQBhuAsKW5vNiEN0MQ2kcyuY3mjSpcFUAiw>