From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sun Mar 28 09:51:53 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD73E5BB746 for ; Sun, 28 Mar 2021 09:51:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@freebsd.org) Received: from fc.opsec.eu (fc.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200:4::4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F7WFj5z48z3wL9 for ; Sun, 28 Mar 2021 09:51:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@freebsd.org) Received: from pi by fc.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.94 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1lQS5E-000Pc3-Dt; Sun, 28 Mar 2021 11:51:48 +0200 Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2021 11:51:48 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Kevin Bowling Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Which cpu/mainboard for fast routing (bgp, full tables) ? Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4F7WFj5z48z3wL9 X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2021 09:51:53 -0000 Hi! > That class of processor has fairly limited memory bandwidth. An E5 v3 or > greater should get you what you want, although finding a system that makes > good use of available PCIe lanes with a single socket configuration can > sometimes be maddening. AMD may have a variety of nice parts for this > application, although I don’t have any personal experience with routing on > such hardware. Thanks -- I searched for a pair of boxes in my infra with those specs, found them: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-1620 v3 @ 3.50GHz 82599ES 10-Gigabit SFI/SFP+ Network Connection and Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-1620 v4 @ 3.50GHz 82599ES 10-Gigabit SFI/SFP+ Network Connection and tested. Roughly the same performance, if we use only one connection. iperf3 -c The boxes were able to reach 10gbit, if we run 3 threads in parallel: iperf3 -c -P 3 So I have some area where I can investigate further. -- pi@FreeBSD.org +49 171 3101372 Now what ?