From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sun Apr 18 01:11:37 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCA585E99F0 for ; Sun, 18 Apr 2021 01:11:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FNBjj5209z3nPP for ; Sun, 18 Apr 2021 01:11:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id AC5F25E99EF; Sun, 18 Apr 2021 01:11:37 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC1315E9C41 for ; Sun, 18 Apr 2021 01:11:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FNBjj4LMnz3ncx for ; Sun, 18 Apr 2021 01:11:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 85F722279A for ; Sun, 18 Apr 2021 01:11:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 13I1BbND053494 for ; Sun, 18 Apr 2021 01:11:37 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 13I1BbpN053493 for net@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 18 Apr 2021 01:11:37 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 254333] [tcp] sysctl net.inet.tcp.hostcache.list hangs Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2021 01:11:37 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.4-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: performance X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: koobs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rscheff@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: mfc-stable13? mfc-stable12? mfc-stable11? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: keywords Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2021 01:11:37 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D254333 Kubilay Kocak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |performance --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sun Apr 18 01:18:13 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FE745EA171 for ; Sun, 18 Apr 2021 01:18:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FNBsK0Bzxz3nql for ; Sun, 18 Apr 2021 01:18:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 06CE95EA1E2; Sun, 18 Apr 2021 01:18:13 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 069805EA1E1 for ; Sun, 18 Apr 2021 01:18:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FNBsJ6jpRz3nwX for ; Sun, 18 Apr 2021 01:18:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D979A22851 for ; Sun, 18 Apr 2021 01:18:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 13I1ICjo057245 for ; Sun, 18 Apr 2021 01:18:12 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 13I1ICg1057244 for net@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 18 Apr 2021 01:18:12 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 253587] nd6: m_nextpkt pointer not NULL'ed before sending Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2021 01:18:12 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: koobs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: see_also flagtypes.name cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2021 01:18:13 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D253587 Kubilay Kocak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- See Also| |https://reviews.freebsd.org | |/D28377 Flags| |maintainer-feedback?(kbowli | |ng@freebsd.org), | |maintainer-feedback?(rrs@Fr | |eeBSD.org), | |maintainer-feedback?(melifa | |ro@FreeBSD.org) CC| |rrs@FreeBSD.org --- Comment #13 from Kubilay Kocak --- ^Triage: Do we have specific commit(s) [1] that resolved this issue? If not, please change resolution to OBE (FIXED is for 'resolve by way of change, usually a commit). If so please assign to committer that resolved and set mfc-* flags= to branches that it was merged to. Thanks! [1] Potentially src b3cfe07d --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sun Apr 18 08:13:45 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC9C85DF926 for ; Sun, 18 Apr 2021 08:13:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FNN4n4J9bz4snN for ; Sun, 18 Apr 2021 08:13:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 939055DF4FA; Sun, 18 Apr 2021 08:13:45 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 935815DFAAD for ; Sun, 18 Apr 2021 08:13:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FNN4n3jj3z4scq for ; Sun, 18 Apr 2021 08:13:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 72C7158F for ; Sun, 18 Apr 2021 08:13:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 13I8DjHi050774 for ; Sun, 18 Apr 2021 08:13:45 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 13I8DjOs050773 for net@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 18 Apr 2021 08:13:45 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 254333] [tcp] sysctl net.inet.tcp.hostcache.list hangs Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2021 08:13:45 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.4-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: performance X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: rscheff@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rscheff@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: mfc-stable13? mfc-stable12? mfc-stable11? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2021 08:13:45 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D254333 --- Comment #43 from Richard Scheffenegger --- I believe this PR can be marked closed, with the two fixes (the race leadin= g to erroneous accounting of the number of global entries, and the fix to not excessively use kernel memory while providing the list of entries) having b= een backported. Perhaps one of the systems with the problem can be upgraded to latest stable and validated if the problem is rectified, as expected. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sun Apr 18 14:56:02 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04B745EB9F7 for ; Sun, 18 Apr 2021 14:56:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FNY0x6X5rz3ktG for ; Sun, 18 Apr 2021 14:56:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id DFF4A5EB939; Sun, 18 Apr 2021 14:56:01 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFBB05EB9F5 for ; Sun, 18 Apr 2021 14:56:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FNY0x5wqwz3kxw for ; Sun, 18 Apr 2021 14:56:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD6DC5E85 for ; Sun, 18 Apr 2021 14:56:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 13IEu1YJ034114 for ; Sun, 18 Apr 2021 14:56:01 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from bugzilla@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 13IEu1Vc034113 for net@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 18 Apr 2021 14:56:01 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: bugzilla set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 253587] nd6: m_nextpkt pointer not NULL'ed before sending Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2021 14:56:01 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: commit-hook@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2021 14:56:02 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D253587 --- Comment #14 from commit-hook@FreeBSD.org --- A commit in branch stable/12 references this bug: URL: https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/src/commit/?id=3Dbe1fb99a727b784781f7d8d95bb6f1470= 7e2d886 commit be1fb99a727b784781f7d8d95bb6f14707e2d886 Author: Randall Stewart AuthorDate: 2021-01-27 18:32:52 +0000 Commit: Alexander V. Chernikov CommitDate: 2021-04-18 14:54:14 +0000 When we are about to send down to the driver layer we need to make sure that the m_nextpkt field is NULL else the lower layers may do unwanted things. Reviewed By: gallatin, melifaro Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D28377 PR: 253587 (cherry picked from commit 24a8f6d369962f189ad808f538029179b1e7dc2f) sys/netinet6/nd6.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sun Apr 18 15:00:04 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EA445EBD58 for ; Sun, 18 Apr 2021 15:00:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FNY5c2PLkz3lJW for ; Sun, 18 Apr 2021 15:00:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 524C35EBE5A; Sun, 18 Apr 2021 15:00:04 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 521465EBEAA for ; Sun, 18 Apr 2021 15:00:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FNY5c1n6bz3lFv for ; Sun, 18 Apr 2021 15:00:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 30AEC5DB5 for ; Sun, 18 Apr 2021 15:00:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 13IF04ru034723 for ; Sun, 18 Apr 2021 15:00:04 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from bugzilla@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 13IF042M034722 for net@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 18 Apr 2021 15:00:04 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: bugzilla set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 253587] nd6: m_nextpkt pointer not NULL'ed before sending Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2021 15:00:04 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: commit-hook@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2021 15:00:04 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D253587 --- Comment #15 from commit-hook@FreeBSD.org --- A commit in branch stable/11 references this bug: URL: https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/src/commit/?id=3Df974af4e59ee533906437b22a5b8b4121= 9bde005 commit f974af4e59ee533906437b22a5b8b41219bde005 Author: Randall Stewart AuthorDate: 2021-01-27 18:32:52 +0000 Commit: Alexander V. Chernikov CommitDate: 2021-04-18 14:57:22 +0000 When we are about to send down to the driver layer we need to make sure that the m_nextpkt field is NULL else the lower layers may do unwanted things. Reviewed By: gallatin, melifaro Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D28377 PR: 253587 (cherry picked from commit 24a8f6d369962f189ad808f538029179b1e7dc2f) sys/netinet6/nd6.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sun Apr 18 15:13:22 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF8AB5EC787 for ; Sun, 18 Apr 2021 15:13:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FNYNy5pQ6z3lp9 for ; Sun, 18 Apr 2021 15:13:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id C733B5EC522; Sun, 18 Apr 2021 15:13:22 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C700E5EC2C5 for ; Sun, 18 Apr 2021 15:13:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FNYNy56vxz3m39 for ; Sun, 18 Apr 2021 15:13:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A0F436305 for ; Sun, 18 Apr 2021 15:13:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 13IFDME6043476 for ; Sun, 18 Apr 2021 15:13:22 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 13IFDMFd043475 for net@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 18 Apr 2021 15:13:22 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 242492] [tcp] TCP fast open observability Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2021 15:13:22 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.1-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: j2465@wizmail.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: tuexen@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2021 15:13:22 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D242492 --- Comment #1 from j2465@wizmail.org --- Related, though possibly should be a separate bz: API for a server application to arrange for Fast Open data to travel in the SYN,ACK packet. I can see two possible implementations: a) where the application pre-loads data before the SYN arrives b) where the application supplies data between the SYN arriving and the SYN,ACK being sent, permitting the data to depend on the initiating IP Primary use-case is for SMTP, where the server banner is the first data sent for the application-level protocol. I could see it being of use for TLS al= so, where the Client Hello can travel on the SYN and the Server Hello on the SYN,ACK (in fact, with kTLS this may not need a kernel/user API). --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sun Apr 18 15:16:31 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CCDD5EC90D for ; Sun, 18 Apr 2021 15:16:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FNYSb0b87z3lhC for ; Sun, 18 Apr 2021 15:16:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 141B45EC889; Sun, 18 Apr 2021 15:16:31 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13E555EC845 for ; Sun, 18 Apr 2021 15:16:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FNYSZ75Xyz3m63 for ; Sun, 18 Apr 2021 15:16:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E63BE6308 for ; Sun, 18 Apr 2021 15:16:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 13IFGULH043917 for ; Sun, 18 Apr 2021 15:16:30 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 13IFGUHQ043916 for net@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 18 Apr 2021 15:16:30 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 253587] nd6: m_nextpkt pointer not NULL'ed before sending Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2021 15:16:31 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: melifaro@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback? mfc-stable13+ mfc-stable12+ mfc-stable11+ X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: flagtypes.name Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2021 15:16:31 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D253587 Alexander V. Chernikov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |mfc-stable13+, | |mfc-stable12+, | |mfc-stable11+ --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sun Apr 18 21:00:15 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 479545F5145 for ; Sun, 18 Apr 2021 21:00:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FNj5B6tkwz4XJC for ; Sun, 18 Apr 2021 21:00:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id D6C0B5F5244; Sun, 18 Apr 2021 21:00:14 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D40495F5243 for ; Sun, 18 Apr 2021 21:00:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FNj5B3Zymz4XWH for ; Sun, 18 Apr 2021 21:00:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6519112AC4 for ; Sun, 18 Apr 2021 21:00:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 13IL0Ece008848 for ; Sun, 18 Apr 2021 21:00:14 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from bugzilla@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 13IL0Ebw008847 for net@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 18 Apr 2021 21:00:14 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <202104182100.13IL0Ebw008847@kenobi.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: bugzilla set sender to bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: Problem reports for net@FreeBSD.org that need special attention Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2021 21:00:14 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.34 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2021 21:00:15 -0000 To view an individual PR, use: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=(Bug Id). The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users, which need special attention. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and obsolete releases. Status | Bug Id | Description ------------+-----------+--------------------------------------------------- In Progress | 221146 | [ixgbe] Problem with second laggport New | 204438 | setsockopt() handling of kern.ipc.maxsockbuf limi New | 213410 | [carp] service netif restart causes hang only whe Open | 7556 | ppp: sl_compress_init() will fail if called anyth Open | 193452 | Dell PowerEdge 210 II -- Kernel panic bce (broadc Open | 194453 | dummynet(4): pipe config bw parameter limited to Open | 200319 | Bridge+CARP crashes/freezes Open | 202510 | [CARP] advertisements sourced from CARP IP cause Open | 207261 | netmap: Doesn't do TX sync with kqueue Open | 217978 | dhclient: Support supersede statement for option Open | 222273 | igb(4): Kernel panic (fatal trap 12) due to netwo Open | 225438 | panic in6_unlink_ifa() due to race Open | 227720 | Kernel panic in ppp server Open | 230807 | if_alc(4): Driver not working for Killer Networki Open | 236888 | ppp daemon: Allow MTU to be overridden for PPPoE Open | 236983 | bnxt(4) VLAN not operational unless explicit "ifc Open | 237072 | netgraph(4): performance issue [on HardenedBSD]? Open | 237840 | Removed dummynet dependency on ipfw Open | 238324 | Add XG-C100C/AQtion AQC107 10GbE NIC driver Open | 238707 | Lock order reversal: rtentry vs "nd6 list" Open | 240944 | em(4): Crash with Intel 82571EB NIC with AMD Pile Open | 241106 | tun/ppp: panic: vm_fault: fault on nofault entry Open | 241162 | Panic in closefp() triggered by nginx (uwsgi with Open | 243463 | ix0: Watchdog timeout Open | 244066 | divert: Add sysctls for divert socket send and re Open | 118111 | rc: network.subr Add MAC address based interface 26 problems total for which you should take action. From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Mon Apr 19 04:26:31 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 646BC5E0F6D for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 04:26:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FNv0726wlz4tcb for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 04:26:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 48CB75E0F6C; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 04:26:31 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4894A5E1306 for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 04:26:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FNv070wjBz4tRq for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 04:26:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 132E918CA4 for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 04:26:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 13J4QVXr029904 for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 04:26:31 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 13J4QVAl029903 for net@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 04:26:31 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 241047] iflib: fail to compile kernel on FreeBSD 12.1-BETA2: Fatal error: ifdi_if.h file not found. Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2021 04:26:30 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.1-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-qa, regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: kbowling@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2021 04:26:31 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D241047 Kevin Bowling changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kbowling@freebsd.org --- Comment #7 from Kevin Bowling --- It looks like the common theme here is you have custom kernels and need to = add 'device iflib'. Let me see if there is some way to handle this in config(9= ). --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Mon Apr 19 04:26:42 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE6765E12B1 for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 04:26:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FNv0L5xJNz4tgQ for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 04:26:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id CA6315E130D; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 04:26:42 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9A815E0C7C for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 04:26:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FNv0L4pjHz4tgN for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 04:26:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8CA7218CA6 for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 04:26:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 13J4Qgmd029961 for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 04:26:42 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 13J4QgE9029960 for net@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 04:26:42 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 241047] iflib: fail to compile kernel on FreeBSD 12.1-BETA2: Fatal error: ifdi_if.h file not found. Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2021 04:26:42 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.1-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-qa, regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: kbowling@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: kbowling@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: assigned_to bug_status Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2021 04:26:43 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D241047 Kevin Bowling changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|net@FreeBSD.org |kbowling@freebsd.org Status|Open |In Progress --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Mon Apr 19 08:08:56 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE62C5E6B70 for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 08:08:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FNzwm4qG2z3Lmr for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 08:08:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id A38875E6EB0; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 08:08:56 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A35015E6D5F for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 08:08:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FNzwm48ZDz3LYg for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 08:08:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 81EDB1B5DF for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 08:08:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 13J88u3k037649 for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 08:08:56 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 13J88uU9037648 for net@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 08:08:56 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 193953] vlan(4) on LACP lagg(4) do not update if_baudrate value and thus SNMP daemons do not provide high capacity counters Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2021 08:08:55 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: bin X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: patch X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: ae@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2021 08:08:56 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D193953 --- Comment #12 from Andrey V. Elsukov --- (In reply to Kubilay Kocak from comment #11) I think Marek means the patch from https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D157015 It modified mibII bsnmp module, thus it always creates 64bit counters. Actually I already forget the cause why we used the patch from this PR. Probably this may be related to net-snmpd daemon. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Mon Apr 19 08:12:39 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5950A5E7264 for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 08:12:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FP0131vR5z3M9C for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 08:12:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 413045E7151; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 08:12:39 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40F705E7263 for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 08:12:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FP0131JYGz3M9B for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 08:12:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 205201BC51 for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 08:12:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 13J8Cde8045979 for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 08:12:39 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 13J8CdHt045978 for net@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 08:12:39 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 193953] vlan(4) on LACP lagg(4) do not update if_baudrate value and thus SNMP daemons do not provide high capacity counters Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2021 08:12:39 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: bin X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: patch X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: koobs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2021 08:12:39 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D193953 --- Comment #13 from Kubilay Kocak --- (In reply to Andrey V. Elsukov from comment #12) Thankn you. That is to say this issue is/was resolved by bug 157015, is that correct? --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Mon Apr 19 15:20:30 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA7EE5F596B for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 15:20:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FP9Vk5cnnz4Wm1 for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 15:20:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id BF0845F5AEA; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 15:20:30 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEBB45F5B23 for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 15:20:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FP9Vk3kfpz4X2R for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 15:20:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F87021914 for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 15:20:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 13JFKUxQ066371 for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 15:20:30 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 13JFKU6g066370 for net@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 15:20:30 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 241047] iflib: fail to compile kernel on FreeBSD 12.1-BETA2: Fatal error: ifdi_if.h file not found. Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2021 15:20:30 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.1-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-qa, regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: imp@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: kbowling@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2021 15:20:31 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D241047 Warner Losh changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |imp@FreeBSD.org --- Comment #8 from Warner Losh --- I'll take a look at this to see if there's something we can do. There's a l= ot of ugly things, I'll see which one(s) need to be deployed here. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Mon Apr 19 17:45:24 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B02D5F9A50 for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 17:45:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bc979@lafn.org) Received: from mail.sermon-archive.info (sermon-archive.info [47.181.130.121]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FPDjv120dz4g6r for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 17:45:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bc979@lafn.org) Received: from [10.0.1.251] (mini [10.0.1.251]) by mail.sermon-archive.info (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4FPDjl65y2z2fjPy for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 10:45:15 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug Hardie Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.60.0.2.21\)) Subject: Dual Stack Issues Message-Id: Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2021 10:45:15 -0700 To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.60.0.2.21) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.103.1 at mail X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FPDjv120dz4g6r X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of bc979@lafn.org designates 47.181.130.121 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bc979@lafn.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.70 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(1.00)[1.000]; RBL_SENDERSCORE_FAIL(0.00)[47.181.130.121:server fail]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[47.181.130.121:from]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-net@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[47.181.130.121:from:127.0.2.255]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[lafn.org: no valid DMARC record]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; RCVD_NO_TLS_LAST(0.10)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:5650, ipnet:47.181.128.0/18, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-net] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2021 17:45:24 -0000 I am trying to setup a FreeBSD 13.0 router for IPv6 and IPv4. The IPv4 = addresses are all statically assigned. IPv6 should come from a prefix = delegation from "ISP" and then sub-deligated to local LANs and hosts. I = have tried numerous approaches from various postings but still have two = issues: 1. DHCP for IPv6 doesn't seem to really work. There are several = packages available, but comments indicate issues with them. In any = case, none of them seem to be viable in the router setup, but only in = the lower hosts. 2. The entries in /etc/resolv.conf never seem to work for both IPv4 and = IPv6. The name servers for both are different. There is one for each = protocol and which ever one is listed first in resolv.conf will return a = not-found response for any request using the other protocol. =20 Any ideas on how to make this work? -- Doug From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Mon Apr 19 18:26:40 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 429455FA8DB for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 18:26:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from karl@denninger.net) Received: from colo1.denninger.net (colo1.denninger.net [104.236.120.189]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FPFdW2vrJz4hyp for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 18:26:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from karl@denninger.net) Received: from denninger.net (096-033-205-208.res.spectrum.com [96.33.205.208]) by colo1.denninger.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96D732110D6 for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 14:26:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [192.168.10.25] (D15.Denninger.Net [192.168.10.25]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by denninger.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 258D524A739 for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 14:26:33 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: Dual Stack Issues To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org References: From: Karl Denninger Message-ID: <876c130a-6abb-7de9-7b3a-c8051b3188b2@denninger.net> Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2021 14:26:32 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha-512; boundary="------------ms060701060108000803080109" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FPFdW2vrJz4hyp X-Spamd-Bar: ----- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=denninger.net; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of karl@denninger.net designates 104.236.120.189 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=karl@denninger.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-5.90 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; RBL_SENDERSCORE_FAIL(0.00)[104.236.120.189:server fail]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; HAS_ATTACHMENT(0.00)[]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[denninger.net,none]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[104.236.120.189:from]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:14061, ipnet:104.236.64.0/18, country:US]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; FREEFALL_USER(0.00)[karl]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; SIGNED_SMIME(-2.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.20)[multipart/signed,multipart/alternative,text/plain]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:+,3:~,4:~]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-net@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[104.236.120.189:from:127.0.2.255]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-net] X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.34 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2021 18:26:40 -0000 This is a cryptographically signed message in MIME format. --------------ms060701060108000803080109 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 4/19/2021 13:45, Doug Hardie wrote: > I am trying to setup a FreeBSD 13.0 router for IPv6 and IPv4. The IPv4=20 addresses are all statically assigned. IPv6 should come from a prefix de= legation from "ISP" and then sub-deligated to local LANs and hosts. I ha= ve tried numerous approaches from various postings but still have two iss= ues: > > 1. DHCP for IPv6 doesn't seem to really work. There are several packa= ges available, but comments indicate issues with them. In any case, none=20 of them seem to be viable in the router setup, but only in the lower host= s. > > 2. The entries in /etc/resolv.conf never seem to work for both IPv4 an= d IPv6. The name servers for both are different. There is one for each = protocol and which ever one is listed first in resolv.conf will return a = not-found response for any request using the other protocol. > > Any ideas on how to make this work? > > -- Doug I've not had issues with resolv.conf, but the other side does work for=20 me under 12.2 without problems. I get both IPv4 and IPv6 from the upstream ISP on this device. The=20 upstream in this case is Spectrum, but Cox also works as I've had an=20 identical clone of it on Cox with only minor changes. /usr/local/etc/dhcp6c.conf # # This configuration will attempt to get either a /56 or a /60 from your # ISP (choose one below, comment the other out) and assign a /64 internal= ly. # Note that if you have a /60 you can have four /64s defined; if you have=20 a # /56 then obviously you can have 16 internal networks.=C2=A0 For most "h= ouse" # size networks four separate delineations is enough, for most "moderate"= # sized corporate environments 16 is enough.=C2=A0 BE AWARE THAT THE SLA-= LEN MUST # MATCH THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE LOCAL PREFIX AND THE REMOTE ONE!=C2=A0=20 If # you ask for a /56 then sla-len is 8, if you ask for a /60 then the sla-= len # is 4 (difference between the requested prefix length and 64,=20 respectively.) # interface igb0 { =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 send ia-pd 0; =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 send ia-na 1; }; id-assoc na 1 { }; id-assoc pd 0 { =C2=A0 prefix ::/56 infinity; #=C2=A0 prefix ::/60 infinity; =C2=A0 prefix-interface igb1 { =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 sla-id 1; =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 sla-len 8; #=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 sla-len 4; =C2=A0 }; }; This gets a /56 (on Cox a /60 works and is sufficient, on Spectrum it=20 will not, but a /56 does) Here is what is in /etc/rc.conf relevant to this: # If you are turning on IPv6 then you MUST set both these lines AND look = in # /usr/local/etc/dhcp6c.conf and make SURE you have the correct prefix an= d # assignments for local prefix length.=C2=A0 Note that we only accept rou= ting=20 info # on the WAN interface, NEVER on the internal one. # ipv6_cpe_wanif=3D"igb0" ifconfig_igb0_ipv6=3D"inet6 -ifdisabled accept_rtadv" ifconfig_igb1_ipv6=3D"inet6 -ifdisabled -accept_rtadv" #ipv6_activate_all_interfaces=3D"yes" # # Ipv6 routing; we MUST be an IPv6 router for the INTERNAL interface to # distribute IPv6 # rtadvd_enable=3D"Yes" rtadvd_interfaces=3D"igb1" # # Dhcp6c client (get IPv6 addresses; note that=20 /usr/local/etc/dhcp6c.conf must # also be edited or this will NOT work!) # dhcp6c_enable=3D"Yes" dhcp6c_interfaces=3D"igb0" # # Enable gateway functionality for both IPv4 and IPv6 # gateway_enable=3D"YES" ipv6_gateway_enable=3D"YES" I also modify /etc/rtadvd.conf as the default for lifetime is wildly too = large and if you don't change it and then the gateway reboots you can be = waiting a LONG time before a client behind the gateway will re-validate=20 its IPv6 address and routing information. root@IpGw:/data/karl # more /etc/rtadvd.conf # Set the preferred lifetime to 10 minutes on advertised prefixes. # All other parameters are default. # igb1:\ =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 :pltime#600: That's pretty-much it. I'm on 12.2 at present on this box and have not yet checked 13.0. --=20 Karl Denninger karl@denninger.net /The Market Ticker/ /[S/MIME encrypted email preferred]/ --------------ms060701060108000803080109 Content-Type: application/pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s" Content-Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExDzANBglghkgBZQMEAgMFADCABgkqhkiG9w0BBwEAAKCC DdgwggagMIIEiKADAgECAhMA5EiKghDOXrvfxYxjITXYDdhIMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBCwUAMIGL MQswCQYDVQQGEwJVUzEQMA4GA1UECAwHRmxvcmlkYTESMBAGA1UEBwwJTmljZXZpbGxlMRkw FwYDVQQKDBBDdWRhIFN5c3RlbXMgTExDMRgwFgYDVQQLDA9DdWRhIFN5c3RlbXMgQ0ExITAf BgNVBAMMGEN1ZGEgU3lzdGVtcyBMTEMgMjAxNyBDQTAeFw0xNzA4MTcxNjQyMTdaFw0yNzA4 MTUxNjQyMTdaMHsxCzAJBgNVBAYTAlVTMRAwDgYDVQQIDAdGbG9yaWRhMRkwFwYDVQQKDBBD dWRhIFN5c3RlbXMgTExDMRgwFgYDVQQLDA9DdWRhIFN5c3RlbXMgQ0ExJTAjBgNVBAMMHEN1 ZGEgU3lzdGVtcyBMTEMgMjAxNyBJbnQgQ0EwggIiMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4ICDwAwggIK AoICAQC1aJotNUI+W4jP7xQDO8L/b4XiF4Rss9O0B+3vMH7Njk85fZ052QhZpMVlpaaO+sCI KqG3oNEbuOHzJB/NDJFnqh7ijBwhdWutdsq23Ux6TvxgakyMPpT6TRNEJzcBVQA0kpby1DVD 0EKSK/FrWWBiFmSxg7qUfmIq/mMzgE6epHktyRM3OGq3dbRdOUgfumWrqHXOrdJz06xE9NzY vc9toqZnd79FUtE/nSZVm1VS3Grq7RKV65onvX3QOW4W1ldEHwggaZxgWGNiR/D4eosAGFxn uYeWlKEC70c99Mp1giWux+7ur6hc2E+AaTGh+fGeijO5q40OGd+dNMgK8Es0nDRw81lRcl24 SWUEky9y8DArgIFlRd6d3ZYwgc1DMTWkTavx3ZpASp5TWih6yI8ACwboTvlUYeooMsPtNa9E 6UQ1nt7VEi5syjxnDltbEFoLYcXBcqhRhFETJe9CdenItAHAtOya3w5+fmC2j/xJz29og1KH YqWHlo3Kswi9G77an+zh6nWkMuHs+03DU8DaOEWzZEav3lVD4u76bKRDTbhh0bMAk4eXriGL h4MUoX3Imfcr6JoyheVrAdHDL/BixbMH1UUspeRuqQMQ5b2T6pabXP0oOB4FqldWiDgJBGRd zWLgCYG8wPGJGYgHibl5rFiI5Ix3FQncipc6SdUzOQIDAQABo4IBCjCCAQYwHQYDVR0OBBYE FF3AXsKnjdPND5+bxVECGKtc047PMIHABgNVHSMEgbgwgbWAFBu1oRhUMNEzjODolDka5k4Q EDBioYGRpIGOMIGLMQswCQYDVQQGEwJVUzEQMA4GA1UECAwHRmxvcmlkYTESMBAGA1UEBwwJ TmljZXZpbGxlMRkwFwYDVQQKDBBDdWRhIFN5c3RlbXMgTExDMRgwFgYDVQQLDA9DdWRhIFN5 c3RlbXMgQ0ExITAfBgNVBAMMGEN1ZGEgU3lzdGVtcyBMTEMgMjAxNyBDQYIJAKxAy1WBo2kY MBIGA1UdEwEB/wQIMAYBAf8CAQAwDgYDVR0PAQH/BAQDAgGGMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBCwUAA4IC AQCB5686UCBVIT52jO3sz9pKuhxuC2npi8ZvoBwt/IH9piPA15/CGF1XeXUdu2qmhOjHkVLN gO7XB1G8CuluxofOIUce0aZGyB+vZ1ylHXlMeB0R82f5dz3/T7RQso55Y2Vog2Zb7PYTC5B9 oNy3ylsnNLzanYlcW3AAfzZcbxYuAdnuq0Im3EpGm8DoItUcf1pDezugKm/yKtNtY6sDyENj tExZ377cYA3IdIwqn1Mh4OAT/Rmh8au2rZAo0+bMYBy9C11Ex0hQ8zWcvPZBDn4v4RtO8g+K uQZQcJnO09LJNtw94W3d2mj4a7XrsKMnZKvm6W9BJIQ4Nmht4wXAtPQ1xA+QpxPTmsGAU0Cv HmqVC7XC3qxFhaOrD2dsvOAK6Sn3MEpH/YrfYCX7a7cz5zW3DsJQ6o3pYfnnQz+hnwLlz4MK 17NIA0WOdAF9IbtQqarf44+PEyUbKtz1r0KGeGLs+VGdd2FLA0e7yuzxJDYcaBTVwqaHhU2/ Fna/jGU7BhrKHtJbb/XlLeFJ24yvuiYKpYWQSSyZu1R/gvZjHeGb344jGBsZdCDrdxtQQcVA 6OxsMAPSUPMrlg9LWELEEYnVulQJerWxpUecGH92O06wwmPgykkz//UmmgjVSh7ErNvL0lUY UMfunYVO/O5hwhW+P4gviCXzBFeTtDZH259O7TCCBzAwggUYoAMCAQICEwCg0WvVwekjGFiO 62SckFwepz0wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQELBQAwezELMAkGA1UEBhMCVVMxEDAOBgNVBAgMB0Zsb3Jp ZGExGTAXBgNVBAoMEEN1ZGEgU3lzdGVtcyBMTEMxGDAWBgNVBAsMD0N1ZGEgU3lzdGVtcyBD QTElMCMGA1UEAwwcQ3VkYSBTeXN0ZW1zIExMQyAyMDE3IEludCBDQTAeFw0xNzA4MTcyMTIx MjBaFw0yMjA4MTYyMTIxMjBaMFcxCzAJBgNVBAYTAlVTMRAwDgYDVQQIDAdGbG9yaWRhMRkw FwYDVQQKDBBDdWRhIFN5c3RlbXMgTExDMRswGQYDVQQDDBJrYXJsQGRlbm5pbmdlci5uZXQw ggIiMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4ICDwAwggIKAoICAQC+HVSyxVtJhy3Ohs+PAGRuO//Dha9A 16l5FPATr6wude9zjX5f2lrkRyU8vhCXTZW7WbvWZKpcZ8r0dtZmiK9uF58Ec6hhvfkxJzbg 96WHBw5Fumd5ahZzuCJDtCAWW8R7/KN+zwzQf1+B3MVLmbaXAFBuKzySKhKMcHbK3/wjUYTg y+3UK6v2SBrowvkUBC+jxNg3Wy12GsTXcUS/8FYIXgVVPgfZZrbJJb5HWOQpvvhILpPCD3xs YJFNKEPltXKWHT7Qtc2HNqikgNwj8oqOb+PeZGMiWapsatKm8mxuOOGOEBhAoTVTwUHlMNTg 6QUCJtuWFCK38qOCyk9Haj+86lUU8RG6FkRXWgMbNQm1mWREQhw3axgGLSntjjnznJr5vsvX SYR6c+XKLd5KQZcS6LL8FHYNjqVKHBYM+hDnrTZMqa20JLAF1YagutDiMRURU23iWS7bA9tM cXcqkclTSDtFtxahRifXRI7Epq2GSKuEXe/1Tfb5CE8QsbCpGsfSwv2tZ/SpqVG08MdRiXxN 5tmZiQWo15IyWoeKOXl/hKxA9KPuDHngXX022b1ly+5ZOZbxBAZZMod4y4b4FiRUhRI97r9l CxsP/EPHuuTIZ82BYhrhbtab8HuRo2ofne2TfAWY2BlA7ExM8XShMd9bRPZrNTokPQPUCWCg CdIATQIDAQABo4IBzzCCAcswPAYIKwYBBQUHAQEEMDAuMCwGCCsGAQUFBzABhiBodHRwOi8v b2NzcC5jdWRhc3lzdGVtcy5uZXQ6ODg4ODAJBgNVHRMEAjAAMBEGCWCGSAGG+EIBAQQEAwIF oDAOBgNVHQ8BAf8EBAMCBeAwHQYDVR0lBBYwFAYIKwYBBQUHAwIGCCsGAQUFBwMEMDMGCWCG SAGG+EIBDQQmFiRPcGVuU1NMIEdlbmVyYXRlZCBDbGllbnQgQ2VydGlmaWNhdGUwHQYDVR0O BBYEFLElmNWeVgsBPe7O8NiBzjvjYnpRMIHKBgNVHSMEgcIwgb+AFF3AXsKnjdPND5+bxVEC GKtc047PoYGRpIGOMIGLMQswCQYDVQQGEwJVUzEQMA4GA1UECAwHRmxvcmlkYTESMBAGA1UE BwwJTmljZXZpbGxlMRkwFwYDVQQKDBBDdWRhIFN5c3RlbXMgTExDMRgwFgYDVQQLDA9DdWRh IFN5c3RlbXMgQ0ExITAfBgNVBAMMGEN1ZGEgU3lzdGVtcyBMTEMgMjAxNyBDQYITAORIioIQ zl6738WMYyE12A3YSDAdBgNVHREEFjAUgRJrYXJsQGRlbm5pbmdlci5uZXQwDQYJKoZIhvcN AQELBQADggIBAJXboPFBMLMtaiUt4KEtJCXlHO/3ZzIUIw/eobWFMdhe7M4+0u3te0sr77QR dcPKR0UeHffvpth2Mb3h28WfN0FmJmLwJk+pOx4u6uO3O0E1jNXoKh8fVcL4KU79oEQyYkbu 2HwbXBU9HbldPOOZDnPLi0whi/sbFHdyd4/w/NmnPgzAsQNZ2BYT9uBNr+jZw4SsluQzXG1X lFL/qCBoi1N2mqKPIepfGYF6drbr1RnXEJJsuD+NILLooTNf7PMgHPZ4VSWQXLNeFfygoOOK FiO0qfxPKpDMA+FHa8yNjAJZAgdJX5Mm1kbqipvb+r/H1UAmrzGMbhmf1gConsT5f8KU4n3Q IM2sOpTQe7BoVKlQM/fpQi6aBzu67M1iF1WtODpa5QUPvj1etaK+R3eYBzi4DIbCIWst8MdA 1+fEeKJFvMEZQONpkCwrJ+tJEuGQmjoQZgK1HeloepF0WDcviiho5FlgtAij+iBPtwMuuLiL shAXA5afMX1hYM4l11JXntle12EQFP1r6wOUkpOdxceCcMVDEJBBCHW2ZmdEaXgAm1VU+fnQ qS/wNw/S0X3RJT1qjr5uVlp2Y0auG/eG0jy6TT0KzTJeR9tLSDXprYkN2l/Qf7/nT6Q03qyE QnnKiBXWAZXveafyU/zYa7t3PTWFQGgWoC4w6XqgPo4KV44OMYIFBzCCBQMCAQEwgZIwezEL MAkGA1UEBhMCVVMxEDAOBgNVBAgMB0Zsb3JpZGExGTAXBgNVBAoMEEN1ZGEgU3lzdGVtcyBM TEMxGDAWBgNVBAsMD0N1ZGEgU3lzdGVtcyBDQTElMCMGA1UEAwwcQ3VkYSBTeXN0ZW1zIExM QyAyMDE3IEludCBDQQITAKDRa9XB6SMYWI7rZJyQXB6nPTANBglghkgBZQMEAgMFAKCCAkUw GAYJKoZIhvcNAQkDMQsGCSqGSIb3DQEHATAcBgkqhkiG9w0BCQUxDxcNMjEwNDE5MTgyNjMy WjBPBgkqhkiG9w0BCQQxQgRATcVijXVAHFzs3nQto0D3GGbiifSo8bk0K/jzL2kL93C+eVvw MaYnFO9Q2u/WD6bgGJSP8PNgs1z11w1i91dIqTBsBgkqhkiG9w0BCQ8xXzBdMAsGCWCGSAFl AwQBKjALBglghkgBZQMEAQIwCgYIKoZIhvcNAwcwDgYIKoZIhvcNAwICAgCAMA0GCCqGSIb3 DQMCAgFAMAcGBSsOAwIHMA0GCCqGSIb3DQMCAgEoMIGjBgkrBgEEAYI3EAQxgZUwgZIwezEL MAkGA1UEBhMCVVMxEDAOBgNVBAgMB0Zsb3JpZGExGTAXBgNVBAoMEEN1ZGEgU3lzdGVtcyBM TEMxGDAWBgNVBAsMD0N1ZGEgU3lzdGVtcyBDQTElMCMGA1UEAwwcQ3VkYSBTeXN0ZW1zIExM QyAyMDE3IEludCBDQQITAKDRa9XB6SMYWI7rZJyQXB6nPTCBpQYLKoZIhvcNAQkQAgsxgZWg gZIwezELMAkGA1UEBhMCVVMxEDAOBgNVBAgMB0Zsb3JpZGExGTAXBgNVBAoMEEN1ZGEgU3lz dGVtcyBMTEMxGDAWBgNVBAsMD0N1ZGEgU3lzdGVtcyBDQTElMCMGA1UEAwwcQ3VkYSBTeXN0 ZW1zIExMQyAyMDE3IEludCBDQQITAKDRa9XB6SMYWI7rZJyQXB6nPTANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEF AASCAgCtLEW1+zu/kFXPZ52M63JzxXDHilyiVL1x7KOm+U22x0KPRWtj++BO8X+19IFhKf6i 2shi0H2sTR6GX82ez8PW17fUbaaQcBjD+jkXeeWY+wJOuWpo615aWtl4/S17OCFcSYfUZg+z EPUf/Tb4RUIwOce8bn62etTGhnJB5Ur5s8DaH6GKcCD8WWs6/Cc6ZoWK4UgxP7qjmH0wXGSM xMGb9jJ7PtxkTwSoETlJwnrhu48lVKBU5Kce4rxzISiRHoJd7VWIVx0w1OwCUPOCICW0ZlIw C7Gy8Xuz7qfcb4swo+BFmgOleZQQH399Jwf8zuDtnOFHZQO8SR5Z2hgJV8J2xo5Zx0x164v7 JeBtpN8ypM074NysOIbRqctHQ6ViTXNZbE8h0UJBzNt+lllrpw2g8DzHqIyZm0nxJTx5xxq6 JE7z+hpwtSoVk2QtFRJDKYXH/0O/pa/vk19AN7ROgsIayvhtJuXOCfCy0qsxJ5T+fA77uW0N G6N9D16bGYbsHgkDN3xyM0V0WTAMSjxcrjO4dWZHfhnmfaTbFq/MXIPJa9l1eCMsVJl+uWFL 0iVcDz95cnsMnHcyBQHde27XmkJcKHopnBykM5u20GNu7zUc6xJ4xIdRZEeZpd+fRIBAHc/Z iSOd6LiIQuWMsmaSZq0WubhE+/ce6Zo5hWMkDZq4qgAAAAAAAA== --------------ms060701060108000803080109-- From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Mon Apr 19 21:08:37 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD0775FF468 for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 21:08:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FPKDP5FMzz4s0x for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 21:08:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id B25BB5FF467; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 21:08:37 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B22285FF535 for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 21:08:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FPKDP4Y5Gz4s5k for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 21:08:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B0402606D for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 21:08:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 13JL8bC4036036 for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 21:08:37 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 13JL8bUp036035 for net@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 21:08:37 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 189088] Assigning same IP to multiple interfaces in different FIBs only creates a host route for the first Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2021 21:08:37 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: Unspecified X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-patch, needs-qa X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: melifaro@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: melifaro@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: mfc-stable12? mfc-stable11? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2021 21:08:37 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D189088 Alexander V. Chernikov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|In Progress |Closed Resolution|--- |FIXED --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Mon Apr 19 22:14:08 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 532A15D91DA for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 22:14:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FPLh00tr9z3BpH for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 22:14:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 1E6A25D929F; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 22:14:08 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E3135D9057 for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 22:14:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FPLh00HY3z4vpr for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 22:14:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F14B827062 for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 22:14:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 13JME7gD067326 for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 22:14:07 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 13JME7AV067325 for net@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 22:14:07 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 241047] iflib: fail to compile kernel on FreeBSD 12.1-BETA2: Fatal error: ifdi_if.h file not found. Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2021 22:14:06 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.1-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-qa, regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: imp@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: kbowling@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2021 22:14:08 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D241047 --- Comment #9 from Warner Losh --- https://reviews.freebsd.org/D29848 https://reviews.freebsd.org/D29849 Contain my notion on how to fix this. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Apr 20 11:38:19 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CD6B5F1CDD for ; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 11:38:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FPhWv2Glrz4cwy for ; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 11:38:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 4E03D5F1B62; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 11:38:19 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DD2A5F1CDC for ; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 11:38:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@freebsd.org) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FPhWv0Wt1z4ch0 for ; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 11:38:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@freebsd.org) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.94 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1lYohl-000Elz-Ap for net@freebsd.org; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 13:38:09 +0200 Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2021 13:38:09 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger To: net@freebsd.org Subject: source of ether address for tap0 ? Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FPhWv0Wt1z4ch0 X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.00 / 15.00]; local_wl_from(0.00)[freebsd.org]; ASN(0.00)[asn:12502, ipnet:2001:14f8::/32, country:DE] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2021 11:38:19 -0000 Hello, does anyone know how the system selects the MAC/ether adress of a newly-created tap0 device ? ifconfig tap0 create has this: tap0: flags=8802 metric 0 mtu 1500 options=80000 ether 58:9c:fc:10:98:02 groups: tap media: Ethernet autoselect status: no carrier nd6 options=29 How is that selected ? We had a case where two devices selected the same ether/MAC... -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 Now what ? From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Apr 20 12:15:02 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 936625F3B55 for ; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 12:15:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kevans@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FPjLG3jtsz4g7b for ; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 12:15:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kevans@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 7DB005F397A; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 12:15:02 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D7AE5F3B54 for ; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 12:15:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kevans@freebsd.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [96.47.72.83]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FPjLG37ngz4fwN; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 12:15:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kevans@freebsd.org) Received: from mail-qt1-f176.google.com (mail-qt1-f176.google.com [209.85.160.176]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) (Authenticated sender: kevans) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 59C99B3F8; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 12:15:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kevans@freebsd.org) Received: by mail-qt1-f176.google.com with SMTP id s4so624924qtw.3; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 05:15:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530mNjdjjcEQzjd9mLFC9OwZhZ54lRCnZawUpw9KI4f/Nu8BVetf Ol9fgfgNtMxoipa/RGIEit/rYOYAzA9mhmFyFeE= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwSPdWFzjYmh0kmLhCyQJoTPfFwA0ehisAQb3B2lw22AeBaI6qCfQpjzhZ0/hqleRP5Uq1QIW81r+53rLEhY4Q= X-Received: by 2002:ac8:a02:: with SMTP id b2mr16651690qti.310.1618920901818; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 05:15:01 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Kyle Evans Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2021 05:14:50 -0700 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: source of ether address for tap0 ? To: Kurt Jaeger Cc: FreeBSD Net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2021 12:15:02 -0000 On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 4:38 AM Kurt Jaeger wrote: > > Hello, > > does anyone know how the system selects the MAC/ether adress of a > newly-created tap0 device ? > > ifconfig tap0 create > > has this: > > tap0: flags=8802 metric 0 mtu 1500 > options=80000 > ether 58:9c:fc:10:98:02 > groups: tap > media: Ethernet autoselect > status: no carrier > nd6 options=29 > > How is that selected ? > > We had a case where two devices selected the same ether/MAC... > tap MACs are derived from the hostid (/etc/hostid) -- you generally end up with the same MAC in one of two scenarios: 1.) The hosts have identical /etc/hostid (bad, probably an issue with machine provisioning where the hostid file is getting copied and thus, not regenerated at boot?), or 2.) hostid isn't being preloaded #2 may be the case if it's a machine that doesn't use loader, or you've specifically disabled it with hostuuid_load="NO" in loader.conf. I've got a WIP to improve the failure mode for that one to fallback to a fully random MAC. #1 can be fixed by moving hostid out of the way and letting the hostid rc scripts generate and save a new one, assuming they're not getting their data from bogus/duplicate smbios uuids. Thanks, Kyle Evans From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Apr 20 14:26:43 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9BFD5D845F for ; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 14:26:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FPmGC5ywmz4nTX for ; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 14:26:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id CCCA75D8348; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 14:26:43 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC9005D8347 for ; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 14:26:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FPmGC5NSVz4nFb for ; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 14:26:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A9F5B14175 for ; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 14:26:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 13KEQhX1023084 for ; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 14:26:43 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 13KEQhmZ023083 for net@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 14:26:43 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 166724] if_re(4): watchdog timeout Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2021 14:26:41 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.1-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-patch X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: portmaster@bsdforge.com X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: mfc-stable12? mfc-stable11? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2021 14:26:44 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D166724 --- Comment #94 from Chris Hutchinson --- I'm just going to throw this out there for a couple of reasons... 1) several people indicated the vendors driver solved it for them 2) I just bought a realtek card capable of 9k jumbo frames. But the re(4) kernel module built into the kernel wouldn't do 9k jumbo frames. 3) This will work even if you already have the re(4) module built in, or from /boot/kernel/ Please try the /usr/ports/net/realtek-re-kmod/ After you've either built and installed it, or pkg(8) installed it. Add the following to loader.conf(5) if_re_load=3D"YES" if_re_name=3D"/boot/modules/if_re.ko" I have zero trouble using this driver, and am also able to use the 9k jumbo frames this card is capable of managing. HTH --Chris --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Apr 20 14:36:09 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 641E25D8F8B for ; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 14:36:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FPmT5256Tz4pFV for ; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 14:36:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 479CA5D8AFD; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 14:36:09 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4767E5D8F8A for ; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 14:36:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FPmT50VXRz4nwf for ; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 14:36:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0362D14A1C for ; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 14:36:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 13KEa8xJ026958 for ; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 14:36:08 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 13KEa8WX026957 for net@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 14:36:08 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 255264] Unable to add default route for fib Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2021 14:36:08 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: bin X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: lwhsu@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc assigned_to Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2021 14:36:09 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D255264 Li-Wen Hsu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lwhsu@FreeBSD.org, | |melifaro@FreeBSD.org Assignee|bugs@FreeBSD.org |net@FreeBSD.org --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Apr 20 14:47:17 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A8955D9F93 for ; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 14:47:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tech-lists@zyxst.net) Received: from wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.25]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FPmjw1Mv0z4qHh for ; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 14:47:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tech-lists@zyxst.net) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0896323C0 for ; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 10:47:13 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 20 Apr 2021 10:47:14 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zyxst.net; h= date:from:to:subject:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s= fm2; bh=c3AcndfWzAAkb9+LGa6bIpxtJX9YPST7F0rzJc+/hs8=; b=p4/jiAu4 3uM4keGx6+vQL90GkN/3rsWdk1STwk7Nvm0RRbqsIKbXQv8KOOTkVwG+IUB/d47e Jr9IASl5DSWOvjC0WN19Zg6MQA6BaFvOw/nKcsmfeYRZFibd3M/NAICAu8xAynVU JIgglJpUMmCfHY4KMQe3ONNjgaQRdnXRF/P56oiWtEpy/g6m4OKVzaWy++8KlAOC TH9uazkqBRmTQHXo2/vj4ec2qkymIwforqMEzlkW6BEbY/GdAeAa3z0eTczzbZox VxDimM5X6SHdWBJaGRFQ7OYZSXckRvLwiKj1LOmQjQ6zKp67zALzJLOAFAiDd2g/ SS5ckPZMzAOTkw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:message-id :mime-version:subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=c3AcndfWzAAkb9+LGa6bIpxtJX9YP ST7F0rzJc+/hs8=; b=ok9NBPajCFHEscujDm5eDSIaYQU3BrzTdZ7CAhwQl+0of XNJ8iHbGXM6e/9sHYfmr0F6dt0pldwBqMHaNfSQ7gotBBExo8npmHYDNf9yom5jZ Ri4pHe/cTIjYuP6mBpidLAPn50No5dYDmbvpZ1QJ1TgNW/+GKgoEwVpzCL3Xh4ex j1rpFTVaXReKxZ6KeM5z4tJtN/MTupaTiASfQS/xHvilVJSbQiPTC3fDn6PQIEEi ienYvkYqEXwXkxuQaSb3gJiXimJypdu4QGjQjS/4levPnoTfSzhKdXaBEB/R1Esx 0wG9ujredCgsW0ilmrTmZRo+tV1spXbMhKAl2Cw5w== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrvddtiedgkedvucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpeffhffvuffkgggtugesghdtreertd dtvdenucfhrhhomhepthgvtghhqdhlihhsthhsuceothgvtghhqdhlihhsthhsseiihiig shhtrdhnvghtqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeevgffhffdtfeekleelhedtjeelvdfhvd egieejveffgfduvdfhteegjeeujeeuieenucfkphepkedvrdejtddrledurddutddtnecu vehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthgvtghhqd hlihhsthhsseiihiigshhtrdhnvght X-ME-Proxy: Received: from ceres.zyxst.net (ceres.zyxst.net [82.70.91.100]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 35C0D1080063 for ; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 10:47:13 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2021 15:47:11 +0100 From: tech-lists To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Shared object "libnetgraph.so.4" not found, required by "netstat" Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="uQSXWFk4ppmkgmFZ" Content-Disposition: inline X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FPmjw1Mv0z4qHh X-Spamd-Bar: ----- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=zyxst.net header.s=fm2 header.b=p4/jiAu4; dkim=pass header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm2 header.b=ok9NBPaj; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of tech-lists@zyxst.net designates 64.147.123.25 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=tech-lists@zyxst.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-5.70 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[zyxst.net:s=fm2,messagingengine.com:s=fm2]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[64.147.123.25:from]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:64.147.123.25]; MIME_GOOD(-0.20)[multipart/signed,text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-net@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[64.147.123.25:from:127.0.2.255]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[zyxst.net]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[zyxst.net:+,messagingengine.com:+]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; SIGNED_PGP(-2.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:11403, ipnet:64.147.123.0/24, country:US]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-net]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[64.147.123.25:from] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2021 14:47:17 -0000 --uQSXWFk4ppmkgmFZ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, I'm getting this in the daily logs: Network interface status: ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libnetgraph.so.4" not found, required by "netstat" This is a vm running 12.2-p6 and has only ever updated using binary upgrades. How to fix? I'd have thought that theoritically this shouldn't happen as there's no custom kernel or src.conf thanks, --=20 J. --uQSXWFk4ppmkgmFZ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEE8n3tWhxW11Ccvv9/s8o7QhFzNAUFAmB+6WYACgkQs8o7QhFz NAX+Gg/7BLFVLD+kp5vBvc2KQs0k8t0E362oLrh83+1/NZn2NT7A3fC61KZoxX8L 1ZBuadR2UCzq6ApmuTv8qgnfu/PNHr3ZvYbNM8RrWNpqcpCKf50XceSZkXZ2hPDF P6XCr/qj+ngNroxrLNgc6gxGcAUxlUOuc0vGVODcykgOSB+KPfuAmdjI6tnjCbeA Ys7ZqqOOojgCj7VQjGmrg4c26CQR46HT/jcqvgXyWr1qx8M9F8wL/ATRrWdEVpbl 8xhzkSjFMBtTXLFtXxD/tm2ACouhZ2Z9Fg98VC9zAduYJsPHBkno3VfrGc6HoVVb 5WcCBeuGyl6NLXoFfeq1dmqDntcvShHQqwPf2redtRVZTkYurVwV9X/m34DGWZV/ 4pM2FzJiVNynLdfZDvZy4/xABg/LnJwV+N0p7KCjMdYTrQWl50cNHhHUzRXey6oE W1WBVFIiruYbThNt9J5ExbSDV5SBTxhY0/Rzdve4ty9qFvQlW4iFUMP4M7E2i3zs cCCeIuerZYBTIgO2Z+jJCNiw7y1QzLEk0buH8umL28ki5osA5qT3SE0pueDsRP6h JB/Rf9wk2h14/TlRAthzWDbov4J+Qzpdfxi1msl6G1iPSSCtHwExx3O01Zb9jCV9 eznVdfYekMNEJT+/StjtWgUNf+SxJT99EyyrimPh9dBBVl0cIRo= =9Vj/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --uQSXWFk4ppmkgmFZ-- From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Apr 20 15:09:56 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EA4A5DA77B for ; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 15:09:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FPnD416qkz4rKF for ; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 15:09:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 2663D5DA83F; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 15:09:56 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 262A45DA8C6 for ; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 15:09:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FPnD40XjVz4rKD for ; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 15:09:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 05BEF150A9 for ; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 15:09:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 13KF9tM6041153 for ; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 15:09:55 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 13KF9tlB041152 for net@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 15:09:55 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 255264] Unable to add default route for fib Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2021 15:09:55 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: bin X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: zarychtam@plan-b.pwste.edu.pl X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2021 15:09:56 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D255264 Marek Zarychta changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |zarychtam@plan-b.pwste.edu. | |pl --- Comment #1 from Marek Zarychta --- The default behaviour has changed. Now in dmesg we get:=20 "WARNING: Adding ifaddrs to all fibs has been turned off by default. Consid= er tuning net.add_addr_allfibs if needed" Please add globally the sysctl net.add_addr_allfibs=3D1 to revert to the old behaviour. You can also solve this by assigning fib 1 to the interface whic= h is supposed to carry this route or by installing the network route for this interface in fib 1. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Apr 20 15:42:52 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D53C5DC086 for ; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 15:42:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FPny36nrkz4t7W for ; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 15:42:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id E92595DC084; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 15:42:51 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8E275DC083 for ; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 15:42:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FPny367VGz4t9q for ; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 15:42:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C5BD6156B4 for ; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 15:42:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 13KFgpsu057539 for ; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 15:42:51 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 13KFgpLu057538 for net@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 15:42:51 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 255264] Unable to add default route for fib Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2021 15:42:51 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: bin X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: ports@nicandneal.net X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Resolution: Works As Intended X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2021 15:42:52 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D255264 Neal Nelson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|New |Closed Resolution|--- |Works As Intended --- Comment #2 from Neal Nelson --- Thanks for the information. I saw the message upon boot, but it looks to be= a large sweeping setting which made me nervous. Also I wasn't sure if it refe= rred to this situation precisely as frankly I don't really understand what it's saying. After setting this sysctl, all seems to be working as it was before. Thanks for the very rapid response (unlike on the forum). --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Apr 20 20:28:05 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 201B15E7CC9 for ; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 20:28:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FPwH86q0Mz3j81 for ; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 20:28:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id E9C585E7F9E; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 20:28:04 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E97F95E7D9B for ; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 20:28:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FPwH83zvLz3j7y for ; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 20:28:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 79BA81957E for ; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 20:28:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 13KKS4wb091047 for ; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 20:28:04 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 13KKS4nn091046 for net@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 20:28:04 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 255264] Unable to add default route for fib Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2021 20:28:04 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: bin X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: melifaro@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Resolution: Works As Intended X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2021 20:28:05 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D255264 --- Comment #3 from Alexander V. Chernikov --- (In reply to Neal Nelson from comment #2) Hi Neal, you mentioned that the message wasn't helpful. Do you by any chance have any suggestions/comments on how can the message be improved to provide more context? Thank you! --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Apr 20 21:12:21 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01E1B5E90A2 for ; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 21:12:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bc979@lafn.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FPxGD5wsjz3lbM for ; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 21:12:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bc979@lafn.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id CB8225E9835; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 21:12:20 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB4A85E95D5 for ; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 21:12:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bc979@lafn.org) Received: from mail.sermon-archive.info (sermon-archive.info [47.181.130.121]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FPxGD0lXgz3lFK for ; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 21:12:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bc979@lafn.org) Received: from [10.0.1.251] (mini [10.0.1.251]) by mail.sermon-archive.info (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4FPxG50Y8mz2fjPy for ; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 14:12:13 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug Hardie Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.60.0.2.21\)) Subject: Problem with resolver/host Message-Id: <041E6B07-0797-436F-909F-5B77ED77DAEC@sermon-archive.info> Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2021 14:12:12 -0700 To: "net@freebsd.org" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.60.0.2.21) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.103.1 at mail X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FPxGD0lXgz3lFK X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of bc979@lafn.org designates 47.181.130.121 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bc979@lafn.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.07 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.63)[0.632]; RBL_SENDERSCORE_FAIL(0.00)[47.181.130.121:server fail]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[47.181.130.121:from]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[net@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[lafn.org: no valid DMARC record]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[47.181.130.121:from:127.0.2.255]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_NO_TLS_LAST(0.10)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:5650, ipnet:47.181.128.0/18, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[net] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2021 21:12:21 -0000 I suspect this is an issue with the resolver, but it could also be in = host. I have the following in /etc/resolv.conf: # Generated by resolvconf nameserver fe80::213:72ff:fec3:180f%bge0 nameserver fe80::120c:6bff:fee9:cdf7%bge0 There is a DNS server running at the first address that supplies IPv6 = addresses. When I ping the first address, it succeeds: test# ping fe80::213:72ff:fec3:180f%bge0 PING6(56=3D40+8+8 bytes) fe80::6a5b:35ff:fed3:4eda%bge0 --> = fe80::213:72ff:fec3:180f%bge0 16 bytes from fe80::213:72ff:fec3:180f%bge0, icmp_seq=3D0 hlim=3D64 = time=3D0.321 ms 16 bytes from fe80::213:72ff:fec3:180f%bge0, icmp_seq=3D1 hlim=3D64 = time=3D0.553 ms 16 bytes from fe80::213:72ff:fec3:180f%bge0, icmp_seq=3D2 hlim=3D64 = time=3D0.544 ms 16 bytes from fe80::213:72ff:fec3:180f%bge0, icmp_seq=3D3 hlim=3D64 = time=3D0.424 ms However, host client.global.example return an error: test# host client.global.example ;; connection timed out; no servers could be reached ktrace of host shows that either host or the resolver is trying to use = the address without the %bge0 which is why that error occurs: 2027 host STRU struct sockaddr { AF_INET6, = [fe80::213:72ff:fec3:180f]:53 } 2027 host RET sendto -1 errno 51 Network is unreachable Is this a bug or is there some configuration item I have missed: -- Doug From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Apr 21 02:54:35 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C7A75F278F for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 02:54:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FQ4s710Nqz4W2g for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 02:54:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 221E75F2812; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 02:54:35 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21EA05F2811 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 02:54:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FQ4s70N4Gz4W0Q for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 02:54:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F01071E453 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 02:54:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 13L2sYMv070845 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 02:54:34 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 13L2sY4t070844 for net@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 02:54:34 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: =?UTF-8?B?W0J1ZyAyNTQwMTJdIEFkZCBzdXBwb3J0IGZvciBJbnRlbMKuIEV0?= =?UTF-8?B?aGVybmV0IENvbnZlcmdlZCBYNTQwLVQy?= Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 02:54:33 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.2-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: IntelNetworking X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: kbowling@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Resolution: Works As Intended X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc bug_status resolution Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 02:54:35 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D254012 Kevin Bowling changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kbowling@freebsd.org Status|New |Closed Resolution|--- |Works As Intended --- Comment #3 from Kevin Bowling --- Per Jeff Piper's information as well as the acknowledgement by the two known users in the forum link in the first comment switching to supported NICs, we won't add the PCI ID. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Apr 21 02:59:51 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E87745F2671 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 02:59:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FQ4zC63nnz4VmZ for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 02:59:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id D01115F2670; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 02:59:51 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFCF75F2A2C for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 02:59:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FQ4zC5RZkz4VmY for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 02:59:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ADF5C1E93C for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 02:59:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 13L2xpGw071506 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 02:59:51 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 13L2xp3O071505 for net@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 02:59:51 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 246003] em(4): Intel I219-V6 on NUC8i5BEH randomly loses carrier or fails over to 100Mbit Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 02:59:51 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.1-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: IntelNetworking X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: kbowling@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: mfc-stable13- mfc-stable12- mfc-stable11- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: flagtypes.name bug_status resolution dependson Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 02:59:52 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D246003 Kevin Bowling changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|mfc-stable13?, |mfc-stable13-, |mfc-stable12?, |mfc-stable12-, |mfc-stable11? |mfc-stable11- Status|Open |Closed Resolution|--- |FIXED Depends on|255070 | --- Comment #5 from Kevin Bowling --- Per the submitter this works as intended in 12.2-RELEASE and 13.0-RELEASE.= =20 There is nothing to MFC to stable/11 because it uses a different driver. Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D255070 [Bug 255070] Jumbo frames work poorly out of the box --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Apr 21 02:59:52 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84DC05F27D6 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 02:59:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FQ4zD395mz4Vmc for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 02:59:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 6CA145F27D5; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 02:59:52 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C70C5F2A83 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 02:59:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FQ4zD2ZZWz4Vmb for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 02:59:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C0671E17B for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 02:59:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 13L2xqFA071519 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 02:59:52 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 13L2xqxd071518 for net@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 02:59:52 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 255070] Jumbo frames work poorly out of the box Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 02:59:51 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: kbowling@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: blocked Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 02:59:52 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D255070 Kevin Bowling changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|246003 | Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D246003 [Bug 246003] em(4): Intel I219-V6 on NUC8i5BEH randomly loses carrier or fa= ils over to 100Mbit --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Apr 21 03:11:10 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 627C55F2DF5 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 03:11:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FQ5DG28bCz4Wqk for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 03:11:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 49E815F2DF4; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 03:11:10 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49AFF5F2EE8 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 03:11:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FQ5DG0wQWz4Wkt for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 03:11:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 128651EEAE for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 03:11:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 13L3B9VJ077141 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 03:11:09 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 13L3B9R4077140 for net@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 03:11:09 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 236486] [igb] txcsum produces broken checksum for i350 Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 03:11:10 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.2-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: IntelNetworking X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: kbowling@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 03:11:10 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D236486 Kevin Bowling changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kbowling@freebsd.org --- Comment #1 from Kevin Bowling --- (In reply to Eugene Grosbein from comment #0) Are you able to retest with 12.2 or 13.0? --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Apr 21 03:13:47 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E567D5F32CA for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 03:13:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FQ5HH5tglz4X08 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 03:13:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id CA04B5F33A4; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 03:13:47 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9C7F5F30F9 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 03:13:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FQ5HH5FMFz4X7v for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 03:13:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A73601EBDE for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 03:13:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 13L3DlPv079128 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 03:13:47 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 13L3Dlfu079127 for net@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 03:13:47 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 235341] regression with em drivers on 12.0-RELEASE Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 03:13:47 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: IntelNetworking, regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: kbowling@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: kbowling@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: assigned_to cc bug_status Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 03:13:48 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D235341 Kevin Bowling changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|net@FreeBSD.org |kbowling@freebsd.org CC| |kbowling@freebsd.org Status|New |Open --- Comment #2 from Kevin Bowling --- (In reply to kaan from comment #0) Do you still have this hardware? I'd like to see pciconf -lv for the em devices, and have you retest on 12.2-RELEASE or 13.0-RELEASE. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Apr 21 03:50:46 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A408E5F3DFA for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 03:50:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FQ65y42Vjz4YXb for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 03:50:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 8A9155F3DF9; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 03:50:46 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A5F85F3FE1 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 03:50:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FQ65y3R5Lz4YHC for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 03:50:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 690E11F517 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 03:50:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 13L3ok5s094223 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 03:50:46 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 13L3okj6094222 for net@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 03:50:46 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: =?UTF-8?B?W0J1ZyAyNTQwMTJdIEFkZCBzdXBwb3J0IGZvciBJbnRlbMKuIEV0?= =?UTF-8?B?aGVybmV0IENvbnZlcmdlZCBYNTQwLVQy?= Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 03:50:46 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.2-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: IntelNetworking X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: koobs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Resolution: Not Accepted X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: kbowling@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc assigned_to bug_severity resolution Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 03:50:46 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D254012 Kubilay Kocak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |net@FreeBSD.org Assignee|net@FreeBSD.org |kbowling@freebsd.org Severity|Affects Many People |Affects Only Me Resolution|Works As Intended |Not Accepted --- Comment #4 from Kubilay Kocak --- ^Triage:=20 - Assign to committer that resolved - Correct resolution --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Apr 21 03:54:13 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10DE65F4234 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 03:54:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FQ69w6vZgz4YTh for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 03:54:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id ED06D5F43EA; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 03:54:12 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECD0B5F4527 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 03:54:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FQ69w6KWlz4Yl2 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 03:54:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC31B1F3E5 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 03:54:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 13L3sCFT096320 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 03:54:12 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 13L3sCqd096319 for net@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 03:54:12 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 255070] Improve Jumbo Frames support / user experience Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 03:54:12 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: koobs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: kbowling@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: short_desc dependson cc blocked bug_status assigned_to Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 03:54:13 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D255070 Kubilay Kocak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Jumbo frames work poorly |Improve Jumbo Frames |out of the box |support / user experience Depends on| |218894 CC| |net@FreeBSD.org Blocks|218894 | Status|New |Open Assignee|net@FreeBSD.org |kbowling@freebsd.org --- Comment #6 from Kubilay Kocak --- ^Triage:=20 - This issue appears to be a a non-(bug)-specific issue, suitable as a parent/meta issue. Re-classify accordingly, incl switching blockers to dependencies. - Reporter is committer, assign accordingly (coordinator/champion) Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D218894 [Bug 218894] Network dropouts on em(4) due to jumbo cluster failures --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Apr 21 03:54:15 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4F135F4613 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 03:54:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FQ69z4MJpz4YTl for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 03:54:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 958435F459C; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 03:54:15 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 953E85F452C for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 03:54:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FQ69z1zm9z4YWf for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 03:54:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 354E81F270 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 03:54:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 13L3sFDX096335 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 03:54:15 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 13L3sFQp096334 for net@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 03:54:15 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 218894] Network dropouts on em(4) due to jumbo cluster failures Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 03:54:12 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: IntelNetworking X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: koobs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: blocked dependson Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 03:54:15 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D218894 Kubilay Kocak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |255070 Depends on|255070 | Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D255070 [Bug 255070] Improve Jumbo Frames support / user experience --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Apr 21 03:56:27 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D47635F44E8 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 03:56:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FQ6DW5Tkdz4Ytx for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 03:56:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id BC36D5F4565; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 03:56:27 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBFDC5F44E7 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 03:56:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FQ6DW4rRPz4Ylr for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 03:56:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 953E11F53F for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 03:56:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 13L3uRxB096707 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 03:56:27 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 13L3uRxb096706 for net@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 03:56:27 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 246003] em(4): Intel I219-V6 on NUC8i5BEH randomly loses carrier or fails over to 100Mbit Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 03:56:27 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.1-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: IntelNetworking X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: koobs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Resolution: Overcome By Events X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: resolution flagtypes.name Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 03:56:27 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D246003 Kubilay Kocak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|FIXED |Overcome By Events Flags|mfc-stable13-, | |mfc-stable12-, | |mfc-stable11- | --- Comment #6 from Kubilay Kocak --- ^Triage: Correct resolution. Without identified/references/specific commits/committers, OBE is more appropriate. mfc-* not appropriate without identified commits (cancel accordingly). --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Apr 21 03:56:52 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D97015F44FA for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 03:56:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FQ6F05c8jz4Z0W for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 03:56:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id C07405F46C4; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 03:56:52 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C03C65F457E for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 03:56:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FQ6F050xwz4YXQ for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 03:56:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9EE5D1F71F for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 03:56:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 13L3uqj8096792 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 03:56:52 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 13L3uqKL096791 for net@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 03:56:52 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 246003] em(4): Intel I219-V6 on NUC8i5BEH randomly loses carrier or fails over to 100Mbit Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 03:56:52 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.1-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: IntelNetworking X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: koobs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Resolution: Overcome By Events X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: kbowling@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: assigned_to cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 03:56:52 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D246003 Kubilay Kocak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|net@FreeBSD.org |kbowling@freebsd.org CC| |net@FreeBSD.org --- Comment #7 from Kubilay Kocak --- ^Triage: Assign to committer resolving (OBE). --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Apr 21 03:57:58 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E17E75F47A5 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 03:57:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FQ6GG5mywz4Z7y for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 03:57:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id C650C5F47A4; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 03:57:58 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C617D5F48B1 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 03:57:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FQ6GG5BMnz4Z5W for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 03:57:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A53001F3EB for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 03:57:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 13L3vwWP096930 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 03:57:58 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 13L3vwbZ096929 for net@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 03:57:58 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 255264] Unable to add default route for fib Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 03:57:58 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: bin X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: koobs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: flagtypes.name cc bug_status resolution Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 03:57:58 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D255264 Kubilay Kocak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |maintainer-feedback?(ports@ | |nicandneal.net) CC| |ports@nicandneal.net Status|Closed |Open Resolution|Works As Intended |--- --- Comment #4 from Kubilay Kocak --- ^Triage: Re-open pending potential messaging improvement, request feedback = from reporter --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Apr 21 07:55:54 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4947D5FB213 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 07:55:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FQCXp1Tk0z4lpg for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 07:55:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 32AF75FB212; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 07:55:54 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 326FA5FB0D3 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 07:55:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@freebsd.org) Received: from fc.opsec.eu (fc.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200:4::4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FQCXp14tvz4lvf; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 07:55:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@freebsd.org) Received: from pi by fc.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.94 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1lZ7i4-0000DG-Nl; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 09:55:44 +0200 Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 09:55:44 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Kyle Evans Cc: FreeBSD Net Subject: Re: source of ether address for tap0 ? Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FQCXp14tvz4lvf X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 07:55:54 -0000 Hi! > > does anyone know how the system selects the MAC/ether adress of a > > newly-created tap0 device ? > > > > ifconfig tap0 create [...] > > How is that selected ? > > We had a case where two devices selected the same ether/MAC... > > tap MACs are derived from the hostid (/etc/hostid) -- you generally > end up with the same MAC in one of two scenarios: Thanks! I've submitted two PRs to help others find this info in the future. augment if_tuntap man page on source of autogenerated MAC (/etc/hostid) https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=255294 man page for /etc/hostid and pointer in sethostid/gethostid(3) to /etc/hostid https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=255293 If I find the time, I'll try to submit the necessary patches. -- pi@FreeBSD.org +49 171 3101372 Now what ? From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Apr 21 13:19:25 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BA5A5E4CF9 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 13:19:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FQLk53NZxz3LXH for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 13:19:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 726AC5E5438; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 13:19:25 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 723595E5437 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 13:19:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FQLk52ljCz3LZk for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 13:19:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D31C26D4C for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 13:19:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 13LDJPn7065213 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 13:19:25 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 13LDJP8f065212 for net@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 13:19:25 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 235341] regression with em drivers on 12.0-RELEASE Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 13:19:25 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: IntelNetworking, regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: rgrimes@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: kbowling@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 13:19:25 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D235341 Rodney W. Grimes changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |net@FreeBSD.org --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Apr 21 15:21:36 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 794645E9189 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 15:21:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FQPR42qmYz3j83 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 15:21:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 5F6765E9207; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 15:21:36 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F2E25E90B8 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 15:21:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FQPR42Bhtz3j82 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 15:21:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E97A792 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 15:21:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 13LFLaDJ024237 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 15:21:36 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 13LFLa2c024236 for net@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 15:21:36 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 255054] jng fails to run ngctl msg vtnet0: setpromisc 1 Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 15:21:35 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: afedorov@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: component cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 15:21:36 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D255054 Aleksandr Fedorov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|misc |kern CC| |afedorov@FreeBSD.org --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Apr 21 16:35:08 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B3625EB387 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 16:35:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gfoster411@charter.net) Received: from impout003.msg.chrl.nc.charter.net (impout003aa.msg.chrl.nc.charter.net [47.43.20.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "Client", Issuer "CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FQR3v5Zxwz3mBM for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 16:35:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gfoster411@charter.net) Received: from DESKTOP2VS42MF ([35.132.91.103]) by cmsmtp with ESMTPA id ZFoelMAT9la4bZFoelkT3K; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 16:35:05 +0000 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.3 cv=ZJpjZkzb c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=j47tmOq8Jh9JtlcCTmVdTQ==:117 a=j47tmOq8Jh9JtlcCTmVdTQ==:17 a=DAwyPP_o2Byb1YXLmDAA:9 a=rb6oIRTCZ6BDaNaZIB0A:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=yMhMjlubAAAA:8 a=SSmOFEACAAAA:8 a=sqdEFVgroVDR__41VroA:9 a=EfJZ2cIqxOWw2Wva:21 a=gKO2Hq4RSVkA:10 a=UiCQ7L4-1S4A:10 a=hTZeC7Yk6K0A:10 a=frz4AuCg-hUA:10 a=pHzHmUro8NiASowvMSCR:22 a=nt3jZW36AmriUCFCBwmW:22 From: To: Subject: Src IP 0.0.0.0 for outgoing off-net ping & SSH packets Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 09:35:04 -0700 Message-ID: <067601d736cc$49402d90$dbc088b0$@charter.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0 Thread-Index: Adc2xOQE3uOMWh5FRwGnrE8rL7/2gA== Content-Language: en-us X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfMAECuYK0hSW4OzND1VHp8YdqjcKs15D9h7+aF/qNCZFRWDZEkwrCx0t8gDNlqRL3NjZGiulgEtDZZ3srt6RV13MWNnvLOC1hwY+A8wHTKcRGc0bpyk2 tcnTAaf8iCxaRBHAafIQh2CUAorlia1jtuQsmGjoPSQmMcV2mYMXryZgpJhr7bdOBkBLbx1oacqDBA== X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FQR3v5Zxwz3mBM X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of gfoster411@charter.net designates 47.43.20.27 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=gfoster411@charter.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.39 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; RBL_SENDERSCORE_FAIL(0.00)[47.43.20.27:server fail]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[charter.net]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:47.43.20.0/24]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-0.995]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[47.43.20.27:from]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[charter.net]; ASN(0.00)[asn:40294, ipnet:47.43.16.0/21, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[47.43.20.27:from]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[charter.net]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[47.43.20.27:from:127.0.2.255]; FROM_NO_DN(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-net] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.34 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 16:35:08 -0000 Freebsd-net, We are running FreeBSD 10.4 with multipath routing enabled (RADIX_MPATH) and are using just a single static route (10.18.91.0/255.255.255.0 10.17.118.3) when we infrequently run into the problem described below. The system is running fine with off-net clients (10.18.91.0/255.255.255.0) accessible. Then at some point we can no longer reach the off-net clients with ping and SSH failing. Interestingly, the off-net clients can successfully ping and SSH into our failing node. When the problem occurs we've determined our failing node is sending 0.0.0.0 as it's source IP address, which is why the outgoing pings and SSH fail. We have also found that if we remove the single static route and add it back, the problem is corrected. Is this a known issue that's been fixed in subsequent releases? I've been looking in the function ip_output() and see where it calls rtalloc_mpath_fib() to lookup the route to the destination (e.g., 10.18.91.10). and then later fills in the source IP "if available". There's a comment stating "/* Interface may have no addresses. */" and the code doesn't try to fill in the source IP and continues on without error, which goes along with what we've observed in the failure case. Thus, our problem seems to be in the actual routing code/structures, which I'm digging deeper into every day. Do you have any tips or specific areas of the routing code I should be looking into ? Thanks Greg From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Apr 21 18:04:24 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A867F5ED9C6 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 18:04:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FQT2w48cSz3rS0 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 18:04:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 8E6AA5EDA49; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 18:04:24 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E30C5EDA48 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 18:04:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FQT2w35k2z3rVF for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 18:04:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D7672840 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 18:04:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 13LI4OLE001005 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 18:04:24 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 13LI4OBa001004 for net@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 18:04:24 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 235524] igb(4): Ethernet interface loses active link state Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 18:04:23 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.1-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: IntelNetworking X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: mack@ifis.cs.tu-bs.de X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Resolution: Not A Bug X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: mfc-stable12? mfc-stable11? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 18:04:24 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D235524 mack@ifis.cs.tu-bs.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mack@ifis.cs.tu-bs.de --- Comment #10 from mack@ifis.cs.tu-bs.de --- Same problem here from time to time on a four port realtek card (re0, re1 currently used). Machine is used as a router and it now happened three times that the interf= aces somehow get shut off - not seen, what the real problem is, as we had to hav= e it up and running very quickly, so an immediate reboot helped in all three cas= es. link state changes to DOWN / UP happens once or twice every minute, when we cannot receive any packets on both interfaces, even though only one interfa= ce is logged with this problem. This switching down and up again happens every now and then without further impact. Time between DOWN and UP message is four seconds quite consistently= . Is seems to be triggered from a watchdog timeout (kernel: re0: wathcdog timeou= t). Maybe the problem gets triggered by (too?) much network traffic, as the net= work traffic was probably higher during those three cases. Btw.: someone mentioned of similar problems when pf was enabled and no problems, when pf was disabled. We are running ipfilter on that machine, so= it might be possible that filtering and high traffic promotes these problems, regardless of the network card used. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Apr 21 19:35:20 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D91F5EFA9A for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 19:35:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FQW3r0cm8z3wJq for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 19:35:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 153AC5EFA99; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 19:35:20 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1505A5EF7F3 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 19:35:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FQW3r01Szz3vtl for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 19:35:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E7D7C4090 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 19:35:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 13LJZJn5043843 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 19:35:19 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 13LJZJvM043841 for net@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 19:35:19 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 235524] igb(4): Ethernet interface loses active link state Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 19:35:18 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.1-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: IntelNetworking X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: kbowling@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Resolution: Not A Bug X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: mfc-stable12? mfc-stable11? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 19:35:20 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D235524 Kevin Bowling changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kbowling@freebsd.org --- Comment #11 from Kevin Bowling --- (In reply to mack from comment #10) This is a different issue. The realtek driver in FreeBSD is missing a lot = of critical workarounds for hardware issues, which is why you see the watchdog= .=20 You can try the "net/realtek-re-kmod" driver in ports which contains some of the workarounds needed and is tested by the vendor. I am interested in improving re(4) but to set expectations these are coloss= al tasks that cover 60 chipset variations and none of them are flawless, I don= 't have docs, and have to sneak this in between a dayjob. If you can provide = more info like the pciconf output that would make for a useful bug report (in a = new PR not this one which is not related). If you rely on the system in a material way I would switch to a vendor supported NIC, like Chelsio T4+, Mellanox CX4+, or intel ixgbe+. Chelsio h= as twisted pair options. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Apr 21 23:26:54 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C31A85F5526 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 23:26:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FQcC24ypMz4bj7 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 23:26:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id A8B375F5324; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 23:26:54 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A87F15F52B8 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 23:26:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FQcC24L5Mz4bj6 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 23:26:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 87DF87176 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 23:26:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 13LNQsGH052791 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 23:26:54 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 13LNQsTP052790 for net@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 23:26:54 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 235341] em(4): No network traffic after upgrade from 11.2 to 12.0-RELEASE Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 23:26:53 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: IntelNetworking, needs-qa, regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: koobs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: kbowling@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: short_desc flagtypes.name keywords cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 23:26:54 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D235341 Kubilay Kocak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|regression with em drivers |em(4): No network traffic |on 12.0-RELEASE |after upgrade from 11.2 to | |12.0-RELEASE Flags| |maintainer-feedback?(kaan@l | |ive.ru) Keywords| |needs-qa CC| |kaan@live.ru --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Apr 21 23:29:48 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABE335F5263 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 23:29:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FQcGN4Cbyz4bls for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 23:29:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 8EAA75F533E; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 23:29:48 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E7085F5159 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 23:29:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FQcGN3Y0bz4brk for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 23:29:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6C6AB6FD0 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 23:29:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 13LNTmTt053209 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 23:29:48 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 13LNTm85053208 for net@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 23:29:48 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 255054] vtnet0: jng files to run: ngctl msg vtnet0: setpromisc 1: ngctl: send msg: Operation not supported Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 23:29:48 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: koobs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: mfc-stable13? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: flagtypes.name short_desc bug_status see_also cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 23:29:48 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D255054 Kubilay Kocak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |mfc-stable13? Summary|jng fails to run ngctl msg |vtnet0: jng files to run: |vtnet0: setpromisc 1 |ngctl msg vtnet0: | |setpromisc 1: ngctl: send | |msg: Operation not | |supported Status|New |Open See Also| |https://bugs.freebsd.org/bu | |gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D2= 543 | |43 CC| |net@FreeBSD.org --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu Apr 22 07:28:01 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0AD35E1F4B for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 07:28:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FQpt94v1gz3FHy for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 07:28:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id A7EFF5E1EEA; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 07:28:01 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7B1B5E2138 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 07:28:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FQpt942Vlz3FRZ for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 07:28:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7E26F15472 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 07:28:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 13M7S1XZ077597 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 07:28:01 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 13M7S1TT077596 for net@FreeBSD.org; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 07:28:01 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 255264] Unable to add default route for fib Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2021 07:28:01 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: bin X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: ports@nicandneal.net X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2021 07:28:01 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D255264 --- Comment #5 from Neal Nelson --- The entry in /usr/src/UPDATING that has been pointed out to me explains the situation a little better than the current message. I'm sure the current message makes sense to those that know the ins and outs, but not those of us not quite so well versed in the intricacies of network routing: Default value of net.add_addr_allfibs has been changed to 0. If you have multi-fib configuration and rely on existence of all interface routes in every fib, you need to set the above sysctl to 1. It's a bit wordy, but more helpful. If it's too wordy, a reference to the e= ntry in UPDATING could be made. As a further suggestion; it might also be useful to add the entries from UPDATING to the release notes. I found the entry there stating the change, = but it was of no use to me whatsoever as it didn't state the consequences of the change. I realise that the release notes are rather long already, but I'm s= ure that some method could be devised to auto include UPDATING entries. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu Apr 22 07:36:23 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B92505E249F for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 07:36:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FQq3q4hTrz3FbM for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 07:36:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id A10585E265C; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 07:36:23 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0C935E265A for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 07:36:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FQq3q45Shz3FyL for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 07:36:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 801C515DA4 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 07:36:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 13M7aNVK080994 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 07:36:23 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 13M7aN85080993 for net@FreeBSD.org; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 07:36:23 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 235341] em(4): No network traffic after upgrade from 11.2 to 12.0-RELEASE Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2021 07:36:23 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: IntelNetworking, needs-qa, regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: kaan@live.ru X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: kbowling@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2021 07:36:23 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D235341 --- Comment #3 from kaan --- Yes, we still use this hardware, I updated it to 11.4 and I plan to migrate= to version 13 but because this is a rather critical network node, we will carry out migration in the summer.=20 This is the pciconf -lv output for all devices: hostb0@pci0:0:0:0: class=3D0x060000 card=3D0x0f318086 chip=3D0x0f00808= 6 rev=3D0x0e hdr=3D0x00 vendor =3D 'Intel Corporation' device =3D 'Atom Processor Z36xxx/Z37xxx Series SoC Transaction Reg= ister' class =3D bridge subclass =3D HOST-PCI vgapci0@pci0:0:2:0: class=3D0x030000 card=3D0x0f318086 chip=3D0x0f31808= 6 rev=3D0x0e hdr=3D0x00 vendor =3D 'Intel Corporation' device =3D 'Atom Processor Z36xxx/Z37xxx Series Graphics & Display' class =3D display subclass =3D VGA ahci0@pci0:0:19:0: class=3D0x010601 card=3D0x0f238086 chip=3D0x0f23808= 6 rev=3D0x0e hdr=3D0x00 vendor =3D 'Intel Corporation' device =3D 'Atom Processor E3800 Series SATA AHCI Controller' class =3D mass storage subclass =3D SATA xhci0@pci0:0:20:0: class=3D0x0c0330 card=3D0x0f358086 chip=3D0x0f35808= 6 rev=3D0x0e hdr=3D0x00 vendor =3D 'Intel Corporation' device =3D 'Atom Processor Z36xxx/Z37xxx, Celeron N2000 Series USB = xHCI' class =3D serial bus subclass =3D USB none0@pci0:0:26:0: class=3D0x108000 card=3D0x0f188086 chip=3D0x0f18808= 6 rev=3D0x0e hdr=3D0x00 vendor =3D 'Intel Corporation' device =3D 'Atom Processor Z36xxx/Z37xxx Series Trusted Execution E= ngine' class =3D encrypt/decrypt hdac0@pci0:0:27:0: class=3D0x040300 card=3D0x0f048086 chip=3D0x0f04808= 6 rev=3D0x0e hdr=3D0x00 vendor =3D 'Intel Corporation' device =3D 'Atom Processor Z36xxx/Z37xxx Series High Definition Aud= io Cont roller' class =3D multimedia subclass =3D HDA pcib1@pci0:0:28:0: class=3D0x060400 card=3D0x0f488086 chip=3D0x0f48808= 6 rev=3D0x0e hdr=3D0x01 vendor =3D 'Intel Corporation' device =3D 'Atom Processor E3800 Series PCI Express Root Port 1' class =3D bridge subclass =3D PCI-PCI pcib2@pci0:0:28:1: class=3D0x060400 card=3D0x0f4a8086 chip=3D0x0f4a808= 6 rev=3D0x0e hdr=3D0x01 vendor =3D 'Intel Corporation' device =3D 'Atom Processor E3800 Series PCI Express Root Port 2' class =3D bridge subclass =3D PCI-PCI pcib3@pci0:0:28:2: class=3D0x060400 card=3D0x0f4c8086 chip=3D0x0f4c808= 6 rev=3D0x0e hdr=3D0x01 vendor =3D 'Intel Corporation' device =3D 'Atom Processor E3800 Series PCI Express Root Port 3' class =3D bridge subclass =3D PCI-PCI pcib4@pci0:0:28:3: class=3D0x060400 card=3D0x0f4e8086 chip=3D0x0f4e808= 6 rev=3D0x0e hdr=3D0x01 vendor =3D 'Intel Corporation' device =3D 'Atom Processor E3800 Series PCI Express Root Port 4' class =3D bridge subclass =3D PCI-PCI ehci0@pci0:0:29:0: class=3D0x0c0320 card=3D0x0f348086 chip=3D0x0f34808= 6 rev=3D0x0e hdr=3D0x00 vendor =3D 'Intel Corporation' device =3D 'Atom Processor Z36xxx/Z37xxx Series USB EHCI' class =3D serial bus subclass =3D USB isab0@pci0:0:31:0: class=3D0x060100 card=3D0x0f1c8086 chip=3D0x0f1c808= 6 rev=3D0x0e hdr=3D0x00 vendor =3D 'Intel Corporation' device =3D 'Atom Processor Z36xxx/Z37xxx Series Power Control Unit' class =3D bridge subclass =3D PCI-ISA none1@pci0:0:31:3: class=3D0x0c0500 card=3D0x0f128086 chip=3D0x0f12808= 6 rev=3D0x0e hdr=3D0x00 vendor =3D 'Intel Corporation' device =3D 'Atom Processor E3800 Series SMBus Controller' class =3D serial bus subclass =3D SMBus em0@pci0:1:0:0: class=3D0x020000 card=3D0x6c401462 chip=3D0x150c8086 rev=3D= 0x00 hdr=3D0x00 vendor =3D 'Intel Corporation' device =3D '82583V Gigabit Network Connection' class =3D network subclass =3D ethernet em1@pci0:2:0:0: class=3D0x020000 card=3D0x6c401462 chip=3D0x150c8086 rev=3D= 0x00 hdr=3D0x00 vendor =3D 'Intel Corporation' device =3D '82583V Gigabit Network Connection' class =3D network subclass =3D ethernet em2@pci0:3:0:0: class=3D0x020000 card=3D0x6c401462 chip=3D0x150c8086 rev=3D= 0x00 hdr=3D0x00 vendor =3D 'Intel Corporation' device =3D '82583V Gigabit Network Connection' class =3D network subclass =3D ethernet em3@pci0:4:0:0: class=3D0x020000 card=3D0x6c401462 chip=3D0x150c8086 rev=3D= 0x00 hdr=3D0x00 vendor =3D 'Intel Corporation' device =3D '82583V Gigabit Network Connection' class =3D network subclass =3D ethernet --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu Apr 22 08:23:04 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60BD55E4D18 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 08:23:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FQr5h26R0z3JXv for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 08:23:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 487EB5E4A77; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 08:23:04 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 484C15E4A9C for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 08:23:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FQr5h1W7Rz3JlD for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 08:23:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2623F16858 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 08:23:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 13M8N422007364 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 08:23:04 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 13M8N4Fq007363 for net@FreeBSD.org; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 08:23:04 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 235524] igb(4): Ethernet interface loses active link state Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2021 08:23:03 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.1-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: IntelNetworking X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: mack@ifis.cs.tu-bs.de X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Resolution: Not A Bug X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: mfc-stable12? mfc-stable11? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2021 08:23:04 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D235524 --- Comment #12 from mack@ifis.cs.tu-bs.de --- Created a new bug report, see https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D255319 --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu Apr 22 15:16:39 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C85FD5F6594 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 15:16:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FR1Gv57f3z4Vcc for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 15:16:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id B04E25F64BC; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 15:16:39 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B01875F643B for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 15:16:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FR1Gv4XZXz4VZQ for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 15:16:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F8371C1BB for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 15:16:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 13MFGdcb098775 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 15:16:39 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 13MFGdmV098774 for net@FreeBSD.org; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 15:16:39 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 193953] vlan(4) on LACP lagg(4) do not update if_baudrate value and thus SNMP daemons do not provide high capacity counters Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2021 15:16:39 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: bin X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: patch X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: ae@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2021 15:16:39 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D193953 --- Comment #14 from Andrey V. Elsukov --- (In reply to Kubilay Kocak from comment #13) I think I remembered why we use this patch. Without the proposed eventhandl= er vlan interfaces created on top of lagg will not modify if_boudrate when lag= g's speed will be updated (e.g. added new port, or one port removed). And thus = SNMP daemon reports incorrect interface speed in the IF-MIB::ifHighSpeed oid. I'll try to update the patch and post it into phabricator. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Apr 23 02:03:36 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5054C624AD8 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 02:03:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FRHdN1dhjz3H2q for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 02:03:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 3645D624F94; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 02:03:36 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3607B624AD7 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 02:03:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FRHdN0j4Rz3HGx for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 02:03:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0BCDD24BB8 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 02:03:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 13N23Zna043493 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 02:03:35 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 13N23ZX5043492 for net@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 02:03:35 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 211219] [e1000] NIC status does not pass into a state of "no carrier" after disconnecting the cable. Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2021 02:03:34 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: bin X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.3-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: IntelNetworking, patch X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: kbowling@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2021 02:03:36 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D211219 Kevin Bowling changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kbowling@freebsd.org --- Comment #37 from Kevin Bowling --- (In reply to Franco Fichtner from comment #22) Franco, can you test this https://reviews.freebsd.org/D29943? --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Apr 23 05:22:44 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37EA1627966 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 05:22:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kevin.bowling@kev009.com) Received: from mail-yb1-xb2a.google.com (mail-yb1-xb2a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b2a]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FRN373XQyz3QSY for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 05:22:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kevin.bowling@kev009.com) Received: by mail-yb1-xb2a.google.com with SMTP id p202so10611243ybg.8 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 22:22:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kev009.com; s=google; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=bnfUnvuNlFxNgDx9FdcgoQ4heyhkH+eYtgYF9S/fRj0=; b=VR9KsrgGFch3QRRtCQ7tF/hQKHzsiTZ3O5boQAr7uGRav1ZWR+DFvg4MzWn3XvZNpP fV6SMdlaPk7DNU2u2NkMkZYd8N9ll9r6ABngAANbdpLR2Qk7W/+t4D91lTZ4vbafqh4r E2EoAxinVuxeipvDqndlKen31lH6ylGaE0koo= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=bnfUnvuNlFxNgDx9FdcgoQ4heyhkH+eYtgYF9S/fRj0=; b=ddF48yvxbOdf5Az684UWtfll4cndthxnXQZZdhPEgaevZaWlN+cfJ/eWrXvw9RHoH9 eP1nmZnIceBIStRev7dCR4lE3cRVaXbYC9dfF+8woW5Ak7LlCdZ7QXIYtelcbqivsjgH VdULBiuhjr2c5oSfYOqvVdhpeb4hzcD+0OifUSW6suJl4+m+mMD5vGoAQPmDILNCHv3H fp0DLsUMZd6P2fqWewWAWmEip4ylAE6t9MhtHyMlPm6cu/iUAiX3aXpbom0yn79lGQqC +x48Yiv/dzJDtk6k2N3cOcRa2SJz/kYr+n25/06hVKeC1dXbsc8OCFjEj5J9WmoHIbH1 12cg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM53119U9Z7UF+q0RLywVOcThIpk6AJPC2eB9uLd7ThkU/kCiyKmcj HjPGHo9VuLlgRO87omnYT6fCUQCt21pg/ik+sBXGYeqST5Vh/BRo X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzo5ySoQxA0pAiiffCxYdlT9Vs5gtxkYgJFhkTiBTEz/IRoJjprsDaqsb++g3/POkwPSpOEn7VpXd9YqSz4cds= X-Received: by 2002:a25:abe4:: with SMTP id v91mr2795163ybi.429.1619155361861; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 22:22:41 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Kevin Bowling Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2021 22:22:30 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Client Networking Issues / NIC Lab To: FreeBSD Net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FRN373XQyz3QSY X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none (invalid DKIM record) header.d=kev009.com header.s=google header.b=VR9KsrgG; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of kevin.bowling@kev009.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::b2a as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=kevin.bowling@kev009.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.27 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.97)[-0.971]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-net@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[kev009.com]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::b2a:from:127.0.2.255]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[kev009.com:~]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-0.999]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::b2a:from]; R_DKIM_PERMFAIL(0.00)[kev009.com:s=google]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::b2a:from]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-net]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2021 05:22:44 -0000 Greetings, I have been looking into client networking issues in FreeBSD lately. To summarize the situation, common NICs like Intel gigabit (e1000 aka lem(4)/em(4)/igb(4)), Realtek (re(4)), Aquantia, and Tehuti Networks are unmaintained or not present on FreeBSD. The purpose of this thread is to gauge whether that matters, and if it does what to do. I believe it is important because we are losing out on a pipeline of new contributors by not supporting client hardware well. We risk losing NAS, firewall, and other embedded users which may not be large enough to negotiate with these vendors for support or have the volume to do custom BOMs to avoid risky parts. My opinion has been developed after researching the drivers, Bugzilla, and various internet forums where end users exchange advice or ask for help where FreeBSD is the underlying cause. e1000 is in the best shape, with recent vendor involvement, but covers 20 years of silicon with over 100 chipsets (of which at least 60 are significant variations). Datasheets are readily available for most of them, as well as "specification updates" which list errata. There are chipsets which have been completely broken for several years. More common, there are cases that lead to user frustration, including with the most recent hardware. All of the silicon tends to have significant bugs around PCIe, TSO, NC-SI (IPMI sideband), arbitration conflicts with ME and more. Intel doesn't patch the microcode on these, but many of the issues can be worked around in software. Performing an audit of the driver will take quite a while, and making and testing changes gives me concern. When we (my previous employer and team) converted these drivers to iflib, we fixed some of the common cases for PCIe and TSO issues but only had a handful of chips to test against, so the driver works better for some and worse or not at all for others. I have started fixing some of the bugs in Bugzilla, but I only have a few e1000 variants on hand to test, and I have an unrelated full time job so this is just occupying limited spare time as a hobby. re(4) is in pretty abhorrent state. All of these chips require runtime patching of the phy (which I believe is a DSP algorithm that gets improved over time) and mcu code. That is totally absent in FreeBSD. A vendor driver exists in net/realtek-re-kmod which contains the fixups and works alright for many users. This driver cannot be imported into FreeBSD as is. There is a strange use of the C PreProcessor which blows up compile time and driver size needlessly. The out of tree driver has a different set of supported adapters, so some kind of meld is necessary. Realtek does not provide public chip documentation, I am trying to see if they will grant NDA access to contributors. Aquantia has an out of tree driver in net/aquantia-atlantic-kmod. The code is not currently in a place where I'd like to see it in the tree. I am not really sure how common these are, the company was acquired by Marvell which is still producing them as a client networking option while they have other IP for higher end/speed. Tehuti Networks seems to have gone out of business. Probably not worth worrying about. 1) Do nothing. This situation has gone on for a while. Users are somewhat accustomed to purchasing FreeBSD-specific hardware for things like SOHO gateways and NAS. A lot of people just revert back to Linux for client use. OpenBSD seems to have more active contribution around this kind of thing and works better for common cases so that may be another exit ramp. 2) Quantify usage data and beg the vendors for help. This might work for Intel, however these devices have transferred to a client team at intel that does not plan to support FreeBSD, and intel does not keep test systems around long enough to meet FreeBSD user's needs. Realtek is a similar story, I am unsure how long they hold on to test systems and would probably need technical guidance to work with the FreeBSD community. Unsure about Marvell, I've never worked with them. 3) Build a NIC lab and focus on building community support. It would also give the vendors a place to test hardware their labs have purged (due to IT asset management policies or other bureaucratic blunders). Set some boundaries like a 15 year window of chipsets which should cover practical embedded use cases. There are backplane systems and/or external PCI(e) expansion systems that could be assembled to house a large number of NICs. It would probably be cheaper than this, but say a budget of $15000USD is enough to purchase some expansions, a couple managed switches, and a few dozen common NICs. Community members may also send in NICs they wish to see supported or undergo testing. For this to work out long term, there needs to be a quorum of people interested in collaborating on the issue. There are some risks around simply setting this up, depending on the configuration, the bus topology may introduce problems unrelated to the NICs and we'd probably need some semi-automated device.hints or devctl stuff to keep from over provisioning system resources (work on a subset of cards at a time). An interesting extension of this would be a semi-automated validation setup for subsystem changes (significant driver changes, iflib, lro, etc). 4) ??? Regards, Kevin From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Apr 23 05:39:13 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2E48627FEE for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 05:39:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Jason@zx2c4.com) Received: from mail.zx2c4.com (mail.zx2c4.com [104.131.123.232]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA512 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mail.zx2c4.com", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FRNQ93fJhz3QnC for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 05:39:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Jason@zx2c4.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zx2c4.com; s=20210105; t=1619156352; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=p+8a1OPdNiiN52PiCkSV60wDmL42u004ebudMU/eeV0=; b=DFVKWH/0cP5m27bP896ZwVbAb5gnAvlaE/Gy7fRPKz//JuAQ+f+zud35rw1esuJexjz1sy cmQeLaeyW1mjpQfVjOxQ2EApAuhBtM6PeGYgyONIruxHR+HFihZaC5Yh2SAQGabeOHANbS bsWV7YXru3G5Vl2TwqFkcAltPYjjBmk= Received: by mail.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTPSA id 005d6c90 (TLSv1.3:AEAD-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO); Fri, 23 Apr 2021 05:39:11 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Cc: "Jason A. Donenfeld" Subject: [PATCH 2/2] ck: add pr_{load,store}_bool functions Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2021 23:39:02 -0600 Message-Id: <20210423053902.16087-3-Jason@zx2c4.com> In-Reply-To: <20210423053902.16087-1-Jason@zx2c4.com> References: <20210423053902.16087-1-Jason@zx2c4.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FRNQ93fJhz3QnC X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=zx2c4.com header.s=20210105 header.b=DFVKWH/0; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=zx2c4.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of Jason@zx2c4.com designates 104.131.123.232 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=Jason@zx2c4.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.30 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+a:mail.zx2c4.com:c]; R_MISSING_CHARSET(2.50)[]; BROKEN_CONTENT_TYPE(1.50)[]; RCVD_DKIM_ARC_DNSWL_MED(-0.50)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[zx2c4.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[zx2c4.com,none]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED(-0.20)[104.131.123.232:from]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:14061, ipnet:104.131.64.0/18, country:US]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[zx2c4.com:s=20210105]; FREEFALL_USER(0.00)[Jason]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; MID_CONTAINS_FROM(1.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-net] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2021 05:39:13 -0000 While these are functionally the same as ck_pr_{load,store}_8, it's actually quite useful to be able to use this on ordinary bool types, without having to add casting to every callsite. Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld --- sys/contrib/ck/include/ck_pr.h | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/sys/contrib/ck/include/ck_pr.h b/sys/contrib/ck/include/ck_pr.h index 2de6e13ec3c..61616213999 100644 --- a/sys/contrib/ck/include/ck_pr.h +++ b/sys/contrib/ck/include/ck_pr.h @@ -179,6 +179,7 @@ ck_pr_rfo(const void *m) #define ck_pr_store_32(DST, VAL) CK_PR_STORE_SAFE((DST), (VAL), 32) #define ck_pr_store_16(DST, VAL) CK_PR_STORE_SAFE((DST), (VAL), 16) #define ck_pr_store_8(DST, VAL) CK_PR_STORE_SAFE((DST), (VAL), 8) +#define ck_pr_store_bool(DST, VAL) ck_pr_store_8((uint8_t *)(DST), (uint8_t)(VAL)) #define ck_pr_store_ptr_unsafe(DST, VAL) ck_pr_md_store_ptr((DST), (VAL)) @@ -199,6 +200,7 @@ ck_pr_rfo(const void *m) #define ck_pr_load_32(SRC) CK_PR_LOAD_SAFE((SRC), 32) #define ck_pr_load_16(SRC) CK_PR_LOAD_SAFE((SRC), 16) #define ck_pr_load_8(SRC) CK_PR_LOAD_SAFE((SRC), 8) +#define ck_pr_load_bool(SRC) ((bool)ck_pr_load_8((uint8_t *)(SRC))) #ifdef CK_F_PR_LOAD_64 #define ck_pr_load_64(SRC) CK_PR_LOAD_SAFE((SRC), 64) -- 2.31.1 From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Apr 23 05:39:13 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C799627AFF for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 05:39:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Jason@zx2c4.com) Received: from mail.zx2c4.com (mail.zx2c4.com [104.131.123.232]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA512 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mail.zx2c4.com", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FRNQ92VJ7z3QnB for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 05:39:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Jason@zx2c4.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zx2c4.com; s=20210105; t=1619156350; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=/ptVxNVEGZQaf/4kgMizz6kRYn6R4JwpIGFweMmNp+w=; b=TklPEBUc2EexPYVOqay5YUfmsrGjptZSJpI6Zr2PkIrp8bvNCd7dIe5U00+478zrBBD/u0 /Scv8cAEor/snWwNXKs7NcyTw6nOTIpW15Oh2vXeGSKhslshVPJIMpi986FCtAcZA5v0SE pJd/6t68bmACXtXzeLo0BD45cHNwgCs= Received: by mail.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTPSA id de8840f9 (TLSv1.3:AEAD-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO); Fri, 23 Apr 2021 05:39:10 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Cc: "Jason A. Donenfeld" Subject: [PATCH 1/2] uipc_socket: add sogetsockaddr convenience function Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2021 23:39:01 -0600 Message-Id: <20210423053902.16087-2-Jason@zx2c4.com> In-Reply-To: <20210423053902.16087-1-Jason@zx2c4.com> References: <20210423053902.16087-1-Jason@zx2c4.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FRNQ92VJ7z3QnB X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=zx2c4.com header.s=20210105 header.b=TklPEBUc; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=zx2c4.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of Jason@zx2c4.com designates 104.131.123.232 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=Jason@zx2c4.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.30 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+a:mail.zx2c4.com:c]; R_MISSING_CHARSET(2.50)[]; BROKEN_CONTENT_TYPE(1.50)[]; RCVD_DKIM_ARC_DNSWL_MED(-0.50)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[zx2c4.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[zx2c4.com,none]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED(-0.20)[104.131.123.232:from]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:14061, ipnet:104.131.64.0/18, country:US]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[zx2c4.com:s=20210105]; FREEFALL_USER(0.00)[Jason]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; MID_CONTAINS_FROM(1.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-net] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2021 05:39:13 -0000 It is useful to be able to call pr_usrreqs->pru_sockaddr on a struct socket, so this commit adds a wrapper around it, analogous to the other types of socket getters. Original-author: Kyle Evans Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld --- sys/kern/uipc_socket.c | 11 +++++++++++ sys/sys/socketvar.h | 1 + 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+) diff --git a/sys/kern/uipc_socket.c b/sys/kern/uipc_socket.c index 92a204aafef..374e2a3abaa 100644 --- a/sys/kern/uipc_socket.c +++ b/sys/kern/uipc_socket.c @@ -3506,6 +3506,17 @@ soopt_mcopyout(struct sockopt *sopt, struct mbuf *m) return (0); } +int +sogetsockaddr(struct socket *so, struct sockaddr **nam) +{ + int error; + + CURVNET_SET(so->so_vnet); + error = (*so->so_proto->pr_usrreqs->pru_sockaddr)(so, nam); + CURVNET_RESTORE(); + return (error); +} + /* * sohasoutofband(): protocol notifies socket layer of the arrival of new * out-of-band data, which will then notify socket consumers. diff --git a/sys/sys/socketvar.h b/sys/sys/socketvar.h index 295a1cf3d37..ad616a4d893 100644 --- a/sys/sys/socketvar.h +++ b/sys/sys/socketvar.h @@ -428,6 +428,7 @@ int sodisconnect(struct socket *so); void sodtor_set(struct socket *, so_dtor_t *); struct sockaddr *sodupsockaddr(const struct sockaddr *sa, int mflags); void sofree(struct socket *so); +int sogetsockaddr(struct socket *so, struct sockaddr **nam); void sohasoutofband(struct socket *so); int solisten(struct socket *so, int backlog, struct thread *td); void solisten_proto(struct socket *so, int backlog); -- 2.31.1 From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Apr 23 05:39:13 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 551505E0394 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 05:39:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Jason@zx2c4.com) Received: from mail.zx2c4.com (mail.zx2c4.com [104.131.123.232]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA512 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mail.zx2c4.com", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FRNQ82vFfz3QbK for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 05:39:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Jason@zx2c4.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zx2c4.com; s=20210105; t=1619156349; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding; bh=XCTQAwIg7wKT+0m92ePsHOnflszSdziYsy6kSmC1fc4=; b=oD9U8puhzszjRuTwMgO0cihKk+f5+6isajzsmLOZjcwNzM4y0ezAu/D0DyTIMvQ83NWt/m EQejInItb1igKTMJQXPh2TAwSFSeL/JyHyipji8yVgzEF6vZUJM7Kwvp5w6HSBgQUOYN34 g35HLzNb2rYh+W+/cXMvu22Tij/R5cM= Received: by mail.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTPSA id 53260b6e (TLSv1.3:AEAD-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO); Fri, 23 Apr 2021 05:39:08 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Cc: "Jason A. Donenfeld" Subject: [PATCH 0/2] two small additions in advance of if_wg Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2021 23:39:00 -0600 Message-Id: <20210423053902.16087-1-Jason@zx2c4.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FRNQ82vFfz3QbK X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=zx2c4.com header.s=20210105 header.b=oD9U8puh; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=zx2c4.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of Jason@zx2c4.com designates 104.131.123.232 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=Jason@zx2c4.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.30 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_MISSING_CHARSET(2.50)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+a:mail.zx2c4.com]; BROKEN_CONTENT_TYPE(1.50)[]; RCVD_DKIM_ARC_DNSWL_MED(-0.50)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED(-0.20)[104.131.123.232:from]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[zx2c4.com,none]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[zx2c4.com:+]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:14061, ipnet:104.131.64.0/18, country:US]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[zx2c4.com:s=20210105]; FREEFALL_USER(0.00)[Jason]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; MID_CONTAINS_FROM(1.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-net] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2021 05:39:13 -0000 Hi, This series of two is a "trial series" to get a hang of sending in patches to FreeBSD and to very gradually begin the process of upstreaming parts of if_wg. I'll eventually have some larger crypto changes to send in (in addition to if_wg itself, in due time), but it seems wise to start with some very tiny commits first. Some background: when if_wg needs things that aren't yet in src/, they get added to "support.h": https://git.zx2c4.com/wireguard-freebsd/tree/src/support.h Then, functions that are in main, but aren't in the various releng or stable branches, get put in "compat.h": https://git.zx2c4.com/wireguard-freebsd/tree/src/compat.h The goal is that over time, everything in support.h migrates to compat.h. So, this series contains two small preliminary commits. If you feel that this is *too early*, and would rather that I wait to submit these all at once alongside if_wg, whenever that is ready for review, that's fine too, and I can do that. But in case you'd prefer that I start with smaller commits now, here's a tiny series for your consideration. Thanks, Jason Jason A. Donenfeld (2): uipc_socket: add sogetsockaddr convenience function ck: add pr_{load,store}_bool functions sys/contrib/ck/include/ck_pr.h | 2 ++ sys/kern/uipc_socket.c | 11 +++++++++++ sys/sys/socketvar.h | 1 + 3 files changed, 14 insertions(+) -- 2.31.1 From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Apr 23 05:48:58 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 599C25E05D5 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 05:48:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FRNdQ1qsyz3RDx for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 05:48:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 3D1AC5E05D4; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 05:48:58 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CE245E0817 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 05:48:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FRNdQ18H1z3h1d for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 05:48:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1AFC927A9E for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 05:48:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 13N5mwPq075220 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 05:48:58 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 13N5mwbI075219 for net@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 05:48:58 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 247912] [if_bridge] IPv6 ndp does not work across local bridge members Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2021 05:48:57 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.2-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ipv6 X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: d8zNeCFG@aon.at X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: version Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2021 05:48:58 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D247912 Martin Birgmeier changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|12.1-RELEASE |12.2-RELEASE --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Apr 23 05:57:12 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE2EC5E0AD0 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 05:57:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FRNpw4cmGz3h3B for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 05:57:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 9CCCB5E08E5; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 05:57:12 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C9685E0ACE for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 05:57:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FRNpw3zHhz3hM5 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 05:57:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 714F327D96 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 05:57:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 13N5vC5I081665 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 05:57:12 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 13N5vCuM081664 for net@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 05:57:12 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 247912] [if_bridge] IPv6 ndp does not work across local bridge members Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2021 05:57:11 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.2-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ipv6 X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: d8zNeCFG@aon.at X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2021 05:57:12 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D247912 --- Comment #19 from Martin Birgmeier --- I'd like to come back to this issue. Basically, I am (still :-)) not assigning the IP addresses to the bridge interface. The major reason for this is that I am assembling/disassembling = the bridge and its member interfaces as needed, and I do not want to always hav= e to fiddle with reassigning IP addresses from the member interfaces to the brid= ge and vice versa. Which brings me to my point: In normal networking parlance a bridge knows nothing about ISO layer 3 and therefore not about IP. Much less it gets an = IP address assigned (let us not digress to smart managed devices). So I believe that we have a design issue here: In FreeBSD we are talking about a "bridge" but in reality it is kludge used to tie some interfaces together. Or at lea= st it is not a bridge in the traditional networking sense. How difficult would it be to redesign the bridge abstraction in FreeBSD to = more closely resemble a real layer 2 bridge? -- Martin --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Apr 23 08:13:53 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F0315E793E for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 08:13:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bu7cher@yandex.ru) Received: from forward101p.mail.yandex.net (forward101p.mail.yandex.net [77.88.28.101]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FRRrb5LTzz3s1W for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 08:13:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bu7cher@yandex.ru) Received: from sas1-4247d44491ad.qloud-c.yandex.net (sas1-4247d44491ad.qloud-c.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:c08:f31e:0:640:4247:d444]) by forward101p.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id A7C6F3280669; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 11:13:41 +0300 (MSK) Received: from sas1-27140bb19246.qloud-c.yandex.net (sas1-27140bb19246.qloud-c.yandex.net [2a02:6b8:c08:1803:0:640:2714:bb1]) by sas1-4247d44491ad.qloud-c.yandex.net (mxback/Yandex) with ESMTP id 2qYBq0I3zF-DfICJjFh; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 11:13:41 +0300 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1619165621; bh=RKoqJ3KSMAIkMqk1Dm7WPvyTXfNuQGXM6HcnRnb4vAM=; h=In-Reply-To:From:Date:References:To:Subject:Message-ID; b=mJh+HJeo6ZKLpLUN6mKIUg3cSGFVS5zfJTpgN/QvuLn06XJITGzTNW4vKglMDMiZD CEMY1mdqBHW/xTXGPu3D3NwU/m+kXBNC8FMM/+EZq8lW7h24A31U0I4Hj+PLMzL2RV M1YksBua0/47x3PUb1po0uZDXBTi+DAiZhSxwm60= Received: by sas1-27140bb19246.qloud-c.yandex.net (smtp/Yandex) with ESMTPSA id poHzwBJi9c-DeLaB7hA; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 11:13:40 +0300 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client certificate not present) Subject: Re: Src IP 0.0.0.0 for outgoing off-net ping & SSH packets To: gfoster411@charter.net, freebsd-net@freebsd.org References: <067601d736cc$49402d90$dbc088b0$@charter.net> From: "Andrey V. Elsukov" Message-ID: <966c32d5-7764-c08e-a781-90377e44c4ae@yandex.ru> Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2021 11:13:40 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <067601d736cc$49402d90$dbc088b0$@charter.net> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="iChIVpyHmS8Q1c3vqirPNqoHusrEmQs3r" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FRRrb5LTzz3s1W X-Spamd-Bar: ------ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=yandex.ru header.s=mail header.b=mJh+HJeo; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=yandex.ru; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of bu7cher@yandex.ru designates 77.88.28.101 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bu7cher@yandex.ru X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-6.10 / 15.00]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[yandex.ru]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:77.88.0.0/18]; HAS_ATTACHMENT(0.00)[]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[yandex.ru:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[yandex.ru,none]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; SIGNED_PGP(-2.00)[]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[charter.net,freebsd.org]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:+,3:~]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[yandex.ru]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[77.88.28.101:from]; ASN(0.00)[asn:13238, ipnet:77.88.0.0/18, country:RU]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[yandex.ru:dkim]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[yandex.ru:s=mail]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.20)[multipart/signed,multipart/mixed,text/plain]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[77.88.28.101:from:127.0.2.255]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-net] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2021 08:13:53 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --iChIVpyHmS8Q1c3vqirPNqoHusrEmQs3r Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="rAFimfZHpWvf3XH1Ebt4LFDDtsD7uTGc2"; protected-headers="v1" From: "Andrey V. Elsukov" To: gfoster411@charter.net, freebsd-net@freebsd.org Message-ID: <966c32d5-7764-c08e-a781-90377e44c4ae@yandex.ru> Subject: Re: Src IP 0.0.0.0 for outgoing off-net ping & SSH packets References: <067601d736cc$49402d90$dbc088b0$@charter.net> In-Reply-To: <067601d736cc$49402d90$dbc088b0$@charter.net> --rAFimfZHpWvf3XH1Ebt4LFDDtsD7uTGc2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 21.04.2021 19:35, gfoster411@charter.net =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=88=D0=B5=D1=82: > We are running FreeBSD 10.4 with multipath routing enabled (RADIX_MPATH= ) >=20 > and are using just a single static route (10.18.91.0/255.255.255.0 > 10.17.118.3) >=20 > when we infrequently run into the problem described below. > Do you have any tips or specific areas of the routing code I should be > looking into ? Hi, the routing subsystem was significantly reworked in FreeBSD 13.0, you need to try reproduce the problem on the last release and report back if it is reproducible. There is very little chance that someone will try debug the problem in the such outdated code. --=20 WBR, Andrey V. Elsukov --rAFimfZHpWvf3XH1Ebt4LFDDtsD7uTGc2-- --iChIVpyHmS8Q1c3vqirPNqoHusrEmQs3r Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="OpenPGP_signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="OpenPGP_signature" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- wsB5BAABCAAjFiEE5lkeG0HaFRbwybwAAcXqBBDIoXoFAmCCgbQFAwAAAAAACgkQAcXqBBDIoXpC mQf/d1l/Cn66aryZLeh7BsAtpxCM9JRt3ETpu/PzdeaYn2tbKBBp1ChsReX9+C7QNVcFefbhkbRE KhtB4Q6JxkMSaK87O3mRbhW+xYrY5sSYB/2Q9pYQJ8PkjsRMOgpFNg6cKrvF4G/auaSu+vHpxP/7 OD8o1aWcSpG8COQA8KvS7PzdNABs8e30SKZltdzhxrqLeI9cDInphBKnjDAYVQ7RWnKt478g9nP6 HMbuaOsYt4zItxlgLOym8wz9Isc2ShJsVml26yZDNOs46oj92cZRKzJjuaP/PC5lvdMZcXGsFHbt cgdSC0tOdGOs2w4pysQKSqMkTiRKqoLYuFII/OD4aQ== =mGM4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --iChIVpyHmS8Q1c3vqirPNqoHusrEmQs3r-- From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Apr 23 08:21:42 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F9795E811E for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 08:21:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mueller6722@twc.com) Received: from p-impout005.msg.pkvw.co.charter.net (p-impout005aa.msg.pkvw.co.charter.net [47.43.26.136]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "Client", Issuer "CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FRS1d2Jswz3s2t for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 08:21:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mueller6722@twc.com) Received: from localhost ([96.28.177.163]) by cmsmtp with ESMTP id Zr49l2G8HeKjEZr49lRcpE; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 08:21:34 +0000 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.3 cv=ALzgjvLx c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=xqrt2BZAGHte7XHhrxJgbA==:117 a=xqrt2BZAGHte7XHhrxJgbA==:17 a=HpEJnUlJZJkA:10 a=m5xhijH0GzXBgENEFjQA:9 Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2021 08:21:22 +0000 From: "Thomas Mueller" To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Client Networking Issues / NIC Lab References: X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfIWygZqiKeKXb25DgtJRaDLHN1mzSZ+osUNkg0N7fdRIwP9EgGZysqVWkgtITCQwXzYOyrD6sadDdYKZ5ihje17/7d8LjKGS8yfdaaWJOU4oOwAiE3/N 3WG92t5RvonQfRLBSR7vAA0f7+a9jzdSL6v5HZrg8mhM/uIkPyOE1Raj X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FRS1d2Jswz3s2t X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of mueller6722@twc.com designates 47.43.26.136 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=mueller6722@twc.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.72 / 15.00]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[47.43.26.136:from]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[47.43.26.136:from]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[twc.com]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[twc.com]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[47.43.26.136:from:127.0.2.255]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[96.28.177.163:received]; MISSING_MID(2.50)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:47.43.26.0/24]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.92)[-0.920]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[twc.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:40294, ipnet:47.43.24.0/21, country:US]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-net]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2021 08:21:42 -0000 from Kevin Bowling: > I have been looking into client networking issues in FreeBSD lately. > To summarize the situation, common NICs like Intel gigabit (e1000 aka > lem(4)/em(4)/igb(4)), Realtek (re(4)), Aquantia, and Tehuti Networks > are unmaintained or not present on FreeBSD. The purpose of this > thread is to gauge whether that matters, and if it does what to do. I > believe it is important because we are losing out on a pipeline of new > contributors by not supporting client hardware well. We risk losing > NAS, firewall, and other embedded users which may not be large enough > to negotiate with these vendors for support or have the volume to do > custom BOMs to avoid risky parts. My opinion has been developed after > researching the drivers, Bugzilla, and various internet forums where > end users exchange advice or ask for help where FreeBSD is the > underlying cause. > e1000 is in the best shape, with recent vendor involvement, but covers > 20 years of silicon with over 100 chipsets (of which at least 60 are > significant variations). Datasheets are readily available for most of > them, as well as "specification updates" which list errata. There are > chipsets which have been completely broken for several years. More > common, there are cases that lead to user frustration, including with > the most recent hardware. All of the silicon tends to have > significant bugs around PCIe, TSO, NC-SI (IPMI sideband), arbitration > conflicts with ME and more. Intel doesn't patch the microcode on > these, but many of the issues can be worked around in software. > Performing an audit of the driver will take quite a while, and making > and testing changes gives me concern. When we (my previous employer > and team) converted these drivers to iflib, we fixed some of the > common cases for PCIe and TSO issues but only had a handful of chips > to test against, so the driver works better for some and worse or not > at all for others. I have started fixing some of the bugs in > Bugzilla, but I only have a few e1000 variants on hand to test, and I > have an unrelated full time job so this is just occupying limited > spare time as a hobby. > re(4) is in pretty abhorrent state. All of these chips require > runtime patching of the phy (which I believe is a DSP algorithm that > gets improved over time) and mcu code. That is totally absent in > FreeBSD. A vendor driver exists in net/realtek-re-kmod which contains > the fixups and works alright for many users. This driver cannot be > imported into FreeBSD as is. There is a strange use of the C > PreProcessor which blows up compile time and driver size needlessly. > The out of tree driver has a different set of supported adapters, so > some kind of meld is necessary. Realtek does not provide public chip > documentation, I am trying to see if they will grant NDA access to > contributors. Some re(4) chips work in FreeBSD, some don't. I gave up on FreeBSD 12.x because of re(4) deficiencies. Sad to have to seek NDA access for an open-source project like FreeBSD. NetBSD seems to work better. OpenBSD GPT support is in such condition as to render incompatible with my system. Haiku, maybe? My computer with on-motherboard AR9271 wireless chip, dating to 2013, is still waiting for FreeBSD support. > Aquantia has an out of tree driver in net/aquantia-atlantic-kmod. The > code is not currently in a place where I'd like to see it in the tree. > I am not really sure how common these are, the company was acquired by > Marvell which is still producing them as a client networking option > while they have other IP for higher end/speed. > Tehuti Networks seems to have gone out of business. Probably not > worth worrying about. > 1) Do nothing. This situation has gone on for a while. Users are > somewhat accustomed to purchasing FreeBSD-specific hardware for things > like SOHO gateways and NAS. A lot of people just revert back to Linux > for client use. OpenBSD seems to have more active contribution around > this kind of thing and works better for common cases so that may be > another exit ramp. > 2) Quantify usage data and beg the vendors for help. This might work > for Intel, however these devices have transferred to a client team at > intel that does not plan to support FreeBSD, and intel does not keep > test systems around long enough to meet FreeBSD user's needs. Realtek > is a similar story, I am unsure how long they hold on to test systems > and would probably need technical guidance to work with the FreeBSD > community. Unsure about Marvell, I've never worked with them. > 3) Build a NIC lab and focus on building community support. It would > also give the vendors a place to test hardware their labs have purged > (due to IT asset management policies or other bureaucratic blunders). > Set some boundaries like a 15 year window of chipsets which should > cover practical embedded use cases. There are backplane systems > and/or external PCI(e) expansion systems that could be assembled to > house a large number of NICs. It would probably be cheaper than this, > but say a budget of $15000USD is enough to purchase some expansions, a > couple managed switches, and a few dozen common NICs. Community > members may also send in NICs they wish to see supported or undergo > testing. For this to work out long term, there needs to be a quorum > of people interested in collaborating on the issue. There are some > risks around simply setting this up, depending on the configuration, > the bus topology may introduce problems unrelated to the NICs and we'd > probably need some semi-automated device.hints or devctl stuff to keep > from over provisioning system resources (work on a subset of cards at > a time). An interesting extension of this would be a semi-automated > validation setup for subsystem changes (significant driver changes, > iflib, lro, etc). > 4) ??? Tom From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Apr 23 08:59:03 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF4BD5EA1F3 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 08:59:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Received: from hz.grosbein.net (hz.grosbein.net [IPv6:2a01:4f8:c2c:26d8::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "hz.grosbein.net", Issuer "hz.grosbein.net" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FRSrk5DjQz3vLH for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 08:59:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Received: from eg.sd.rdtc.ru (root@eg.sd.rdtc.ru [62.231.161.221] (may be forged)) by hz.grosbein.net (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 13N8wsrk011084 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 23 Apr 2021 08:58:54 GMT (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) X-Envelope-From: eugen@grosbein.net X-Envelope-To: gfoster411@charter.net Received: from [10.58.0.10] (dadvw [10.58.0.10]) by eg.sd.rdtc.ru (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPS id 13N8wok5051758 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT); Fri, 23 Apr 2021 15:58:50 +0700 (+07) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Subject: Re: Src IP 0.0.0.0 for outgoing off-net ping & SSH packets To: gfoster411@charter.net, freebsd-net@freebsd.org References: <067601d736cc$49402d90$dbc088b0$@charter.net> From: Eugene Grosbein Message-ID: Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2021 15:58:40 +0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <067601d736cc$49402d90$dbc088b0$@charter.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,LOCAL_FROM, NICE_REPLY_A,RDNS_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Report: * -2.3 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record * 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record * 1.9 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS * 2.6 LOCAL_FROM From my domains * -0.0 NICE_REPLY_A Looks like a legit reply (A) X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on hz.grosbein.net X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FRSrk5DjQz3vLH X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=fail (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of eugen@grosbein.net does not designate 2a01:4f8:c2c:26d8::2 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=eugen@grosbein.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.10 / 15.00]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; R_SPF_FAIL(1.00)[-all]; FREEFALL_USER(0.00)[eugen]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[2a01:4f8:c2c:26d8::2:from]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[grosbein.net]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[2a01:4f8:c2c:26d8::2:from:127.0.2.255]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[charter.net,freebsd.org]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:2a01:4f8::/32, country:DE]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-net] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2021 08:59:03 -0000 21.04.2021 23:35, gfoster411@charter.net wrote: > Do you have any tips or specific areas of the routing code I should be > looking into ? ping using 0.0.0.0 as source address means you have an inteface without any IP address assigned, indeed. And this is the interface selected as outgoing for requests. If you have such interfaces and observe 0.0.0.0 as source, you should stop relying on automatic source IP selection and supply some IP manually, instead: ping -S $myip $destination Same with ssh -b etc. I have similar setups with vlan interfaces without IP that generally used to route /32 prefixes into, so I have to use ping -S in such cases, it helps. From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Apr 23 10:35:12 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D85055ECC32 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 10:35:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FRVzh5bnjz4Txp for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 10:35:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id C02E95EC8D1; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 10:35:12 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFF705ECC31 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 10:35:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FRVzh4xZsz4Tk1 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 10:35:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 969833C05 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 10:35:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 13NAZCA1036470 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 10:35:12 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 13NAZClW036469 for net@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 10:35:12 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 247912] [if_bridge] IPv6 ndp does not work across local bridge members Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2021 10:35:12 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.2-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ipv6 X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: donner@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2021 10:35:12 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D247912 Lutz Donnerhacke changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |donner@FreeBSD.org --- Comment #20 from Lutz Donnerhacke --- There are two bridge implementations in FreeBSD. The classical one you are using. And the netgraph one ng_bridge, which is much simpler. If you have a problem with the classical one, would you mind to give the ng_bridge a try?= You may assign ng_eiface virtual interfaces to it, if necessary. I'm just curious to know which part of the classical bridge is the problema= tic part. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Apr 23 11:27:57 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9C4C5EFC7D for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 11:27:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gpalmer@freebsd.org) Received: from mail.in-addr.com (mail.in-addr.com [IPv6:2a01:4f8:191:61e8::2525:2525]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FRX8Y3T30z4ZMh for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 11:27:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gpalmer@freebsd.org) Received: from gjp by mail.in-addr.com with local (Exim 4.94 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1lZtyP-0008VN-93; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 12:27:49 +0100 Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2021 12:27:49 +0100 From: Gary Palmer To: Kevin Bowling Cc: FreeBSD Net Subject: Re: Client Networking Issues / NIC Lab Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: gpalmer@freebsd.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on mail.in-addr.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FRX8Y3T30z4ZMh X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.00 / 15.00]; local_wl_from(0.00)[freebsd.org]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:2a01:4f8::/32, country:DE] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2021 11:27:57 -0000 On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 10:22:30PM -0700, Kevin Bowling wrote: > Aquantia has an out of tree driver in net/aquantia-atlantic-kmod. The > code is not currently in a place where I'd like to see it in the tree. > I am not really sure how common these are, the company was acquired by > Marvell which is still producing them as a client networking option > while they have other IP for higher end/speed. Aquantia seems to be used in more and more motherboards to provide >1Gbps network interfaces (2.5Gbps or 10Gbps). Particularly consumer oriented motherboards Regards, Gary From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Apr 23 12:47:09 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2EC35F291F for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 12:47:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kevans@freebsd.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::24b:4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FRYvx4jkkz4f4v for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 12:47:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kevans@freebsd.org) Received: from mail-qv1-f47.google.com (mail-qv1-f47.google.com [209.85.219.47]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) (Authenticated sender: kevans) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 900BCE2CF for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 12:47:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kevans@freebsd.org) Received: by mail-qv1-f47.google.com with SMTP id ef17so18003973qvb.0 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 05:47:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5315HNrhE26auExd9yh+PQHa3kRCfKKZrH21GEnIvFcaI8u78QEJ ubXVFXF5LVZw3vybz4VB/dP2xul1sz/HcKhE9z8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxcXsvswnHbArrS3dnaU0USR5WQuKKLxKZsQlQd2Pw1/0Uk0hO0VWw2FtiZOil/YCQaKwPcwkjQD04LKTtYBws= X-Received: by 2002:ad4:4c86:: with SMTP id bs6mr4459220qvb.39.1619182029146; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 05:47:09 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Kyle Evans Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2021 07:46:57 -0500 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: Client Networking Issues / NIC Lab To: Kevin Bowling Cc: FreeBSD Net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2021 12:47:09 -0000 On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 12:22 AM Kevin Bowling wrote: > > Greetings, > > [... snip ...] > > Tehuti Networks seems to have gone out of business. Probably not > worth worrying about. > That's unfortunate. I had a box of their 10G NICs and I got them to put a driver up for review[0][1], but they weren't very responsive and the existing codebase was in pretty rough shape. Beyond that, your #3 seems to be the most appealing. #2 could probably work in the mid-to-long term, but we'd likely be better off bootstrapping interest with solid community-supported drivers then reaching out to vendors once we can demonstrate that plan field of dreams can work and drive some substantial amount of business. Thanks, Kyle Evans [0] https://reviews.freebsd.org/D18856 [1] https://reviews.freebsd.org/D19433 From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Apr 23 13:19:31 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8A225F30FB for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 13:19:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rmacklem@uoguelph.ca) Received: from CAN01-QB1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-qb1can01on0608.outbound.protection.outlook.com [IPv6:2a01:111:f400:fe5c::608]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.protection.outlook.com", Issuer "DigiCert Cloud Services CA-1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FRZdG6gmMz4g9V for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 13:19:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rmacklem@uoguelph.ca) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=f2xnqdWB5wdaKEZCNfHKkjGKgXsTGUe4orVXtWGCp1YIHnmVzUlzmJXLP+6HQAU9r49/NCsqjP7drr5oeGKxBHtoL4AN9NNDDhd4DPykIkEhKTtwbEZZt0QSW7HMC0/1io4zUFwGCyLZ4BjjJY7rkM1GUnca6UdBT2hUDIromkjjKucBdN7YVvlJ8RLmfmKctrBnnALICAIgNWByJH4iMwTZtVdEqu/pz3ohFUC4IhnZ75UnvirBAqloDojOm1tf5K6BUBMQMlU1XAD9Q0B9JJlI2yYC5zwctDjz+2gRDeX/sYLAzGR7peUZefVn8wCTOEH/rd1SMlfjkNs/xWdRKg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=nh7GGxhR4nO0/gkjrVe3tK2qVJLiX3jZY9awQbLTPPI=; b=nmGqwMcFd8dbxiWQAhlMsS81iJtJdrEnbFBawanFZZQZSwZScJXXY3jgtj3n01YloSHkRZRpj+wxJryoU4GMATX1t/ISc6QJDE5BJADIFOPoi3T3ymZnxFWOG9ndmen4D3YE88yc4H60KPOYssQjaKKhAIBtUfXdenipFbrSC9rWtrFFIG0begeSiDYC5lmV13zeO6nwX2E2OzN9qJj3wa/vKVrm6m/mfRfdasOhso83OvX9FgWpMy54qkQyJgENUvzi/gCf8mSFwgbyAhj+fQvArgn7EYrmHEdLZto7ofNPU0tOMzEI0g5miXBNRCpYQYS/hEMgX6Q1gojzHbeSpA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=uoguelph.ca; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=uoguelph.ca; dkim=pass header.d=uoguelph.ca; arc=none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=uoguelph.ca; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=nh7GGxhR4nO0/gkjrVe3tK2qVJLiX3jZY9awQbLTPPI=; b=WIOPyX/2Owml9xlebjnzd3ScqsZQfLSRKgHJz/9hPmAhcRj3vjfvPORvz9syvjT4UW74lemIiCBthbu3L77lNYjirhdd4ISvxe5s+YDHu1MdGHwDn0lGHxZJHpPhFQx0kkNVhvdkeHxDOfjmsAiswWvEfUBWb5fCW3nGS1W/yA8Gkf4O3QM/JMnJhKfceSqk8PineZlz7TKHjK+B4jCiBNmIEvwRw1OUg1wkAKmjNblzlNhQDqsgIg+aFUU+DjI/4fLq0lGzLlquDSU8CtHwWZjNBJilPwKf8f9UF5sBs5isJLUFSk7AqR8W+LinVQAoYRnTcGlwn+obhAzmzk8S4A== Received: from YQXPR0101MB0968.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (2603:10b6:c00:19::29) by YQXPR01MB4133.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (2603:10b6:c01:6::12) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.4042.20; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 13:19:28 +0000 Received: from YQXPR0101MB0968.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM ([fe80::1c05:585a:132a:f08e]) by YQXPR0101MB0968.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM ([fe80::1c05:585a:132a:f08e%4]) with mapi id 15.20.3999.038; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 13:19:23 +0000 From: Rick Macklem To: Kevin Bowling CC: FreeBSD Net Subject: Re: Client Networking Issues / NIC Lab Thread-Topic: Client Networking Issues / NIC Lab Thread-Index: AQHXOD7V4NoWhXLg6U21ATvCPvLMK6rCEd4n Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2021 13:19:23 +0000 Message-ID: References: , In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-ms-publictraffictype: Email x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 290d14c0-ee12-4a14-7b5e-08d9065a6978 x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: YQXPR01MB4133: x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:10000; x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1 x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 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 x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:YQXPR0101MB0968.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFS:(39860400002)(366004)(396003)(376002)(136003)(346002)(66946007)(66476007)(33656002)(2906002)(786003)(76116006)(66556008)(91956017)(64756008)(7696005)(316002)(8936002)(71200400001)(9686003)(5660300002)(6916009)(86362001)(6506007)(55016002)(186003)(38100700002)(122000001)(966005)(66446008)(8676002)(83380400001)(478600001)(4326008)(52536014); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: =?iso-8859-1?Q?GDQ6DuMC6kG9JW8Xwf2Q96q/4Bv1EvMb9YlH2Jz1FbhT5KgcyM63aAGq/b?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?MSRntBDtKmWoXA7H4yhoPtm3y/AlMKNbY/CDIHVUbcYZRX/b4rQdNMm/i3?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?vb0pC0IDg6RnSAAGU18zERFoNQPuUaB/53hXOWkl5zH4DHveNraqZi9XvO?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?n3ut3QiJ1vj4OjvqqwEpEACZkOLW+1MAOGiGPjAt7DJ9cu5Z7C6GtE4fnx?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?8QADWTjwU3uBezaK5farNl9j2FcbV6uaNFRCRCiIwxVADFvjasZShwnOZ7?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?ySwsac6bV0yUHJFry3zaCJj62lXi7yKYvElQjwPXME5X2aakThPWN4MOwT?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?K7Wd70q33/pY2RU8Ki3IPAfv4gbqqPqwnGL5UbIbQV3ivmxIbE5LKQaZ5y?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?M+b8CThCskIyvQ9s4M1xlH983AELVU+Ia7rXTQeEt7g2f8iwiPdrj0TwFt?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?Yk0vmg3ZFBpk5yLQ8tPjCDs36TahAXnG42NAGnrb4HMtEtar4gPEJ9Pfqy?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?UJk+cr7LI+S+5JFwFYaqr2iQ6H570q/uvnPwynaEvLJ/kpuZeVL2Ty2eRA?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?sOr+9FhbiFJdRIeex34rs0RrD+h8QEWZGPqc3HaTQPIRRTewwfrqHGJw7T?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?GOThsxvr/8MLzkFkmVxlYMvEG9p9U6ED/iaxUXJeT1VpN4Cb9dkZVROEyJ?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?lwuEcGqZev6+r788vl4aa/lb9bK9Yuxz77eaXDlvwaAuXy9UdCpNy5K/1A?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?SEGcl7Vc9ZZyctfnejQ0pOA8r+f8aTzbOnKsYe6jo1a8kVvbVzvOhm/zFE?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?eHXyo9AtMFnGKbiHgB/j6wUfZEtLTezJXgBLq5y2AGXrBmUUggNrCeBmLX?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?ClqHZlUy34WZeskmKbH8Y6lVBSQF5HSzn6UW0pEfbHmeinzu5kr7w0xbM9?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?+949i4bagFaJyK+MHhv6RoDpTbrR7YwtuY2ABjgjgVURIdOJ4wx+LPqzQ4?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?tBOUPsrKNy1dPXPBN/G/s6E9y4+kRpNiSWwh+sHvz0U241nx75ZAjphdrn?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?Pv5mV+mvAdsdWkOGwEZ4wFCwOaFBKo8l9YDTCmHIGdBtdD7H4BaVx4YfoP?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?awIzNCg3P8PEWQcO7Clf9XolqjYybOTazoxSlTS7aCSUiBWUH/r0QlQaqv?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?zFjQxZWESCu5nbgPjCAAP7JLKG2DEYa77wfBe01wnYISuVt0vxkGEmRx5J?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?TzpYYWpy09hD4eEawiPCP8/E7wazKhw19qoFmv4U+O18H0PItz9gHRx8ps?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?Va9xzGT+CptxS48dlg/0+9ETGqBy3tpmt1bB8h2ovGWLj6doX+n4EAN1qg?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?JNSKZy+IMcsxmoF2pPv75fki4ZnnhuGCMwtKrheiZljRcL0nZzUd0sMwyn?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?e5mCGla4Y08wzdpP?= x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: uoguelph.ca X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: YQXPR0101MB0968.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 290d14c0-ee12-4a14-7b5e-08d9065a6978 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 23 Apr 2021 13:19:23.4753 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: be62a12b-2cad-49a1-a5fa-85f4f3156a7d X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: NKjBJ+KbUa2MCFArHCwFgwmqxvmxrDG/lIWZT/HAdSSCzGxgdswKICii2R+bSEulfP/c4R7qLOvmStkDvtivPA== X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: YQXPR01MB4133 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FRZdG6gmMz4g9V X-Spamd-Bar: ------ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=uoguelph.ca header.s=selector1 header.b=WIOPyX/2; arc=pass (microsoft.com:s=arcselector9901:i=1); dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=uoguelph.ca; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of rmacklem@uoguelph.ca designates 2a01:111:f400:fe5c::608 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=rmacklem@uoguelph.ca X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-6.00 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[2a01:111:f400:fe5c::608:from]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[uoguelph.ca:s=selector1]; FREEFALL_USER(0.00)[rmacklem]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a01:111:f400::/48]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[2a01:111:f400:fe5c::608:from:127.0.2.255]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[uoguelph.ca:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DWL_DNSWL_LOW(-1.00)[uoguelph.ca:dkim]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[uoguelph.ca,none]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:8075, ipnet:2a01:111:f000::/36, country:US]; ARC_ALLOW(-1.00)[microsoft.com:s=arcselector9901:i=1]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-net] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2021 13:19:32 -0000 Kyle Evans wrote:=0A= >On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 12:22 AM Kevin Bowling = wrote:=0A= >>=0A= >> Greetings,=0A= >>=0A= >> [... snip ...]=0A= >>=0A= >> Tehuti Networks seems to have gone out of business. Probably not=0A= >> worth worrying about.=0A= >>=0A= >=0A= >That's unfortunate. I had a box of their 10G NICs and I got them to=0A= >put a driver up for review[0][1], but they weren't very responsive and=0A= >the existing codebase was in pretty rough shape.=0A= >=0A= >Beyond that, your #3 seems to be the most appealing. #2 could probably=0A= >work in the mid-to-long term, but we'd likely be better off=0A= >bootstrapping interest with solid community-supported drivers then=0A= >reaching out to vendors once we can demonstrate that plan field of=0A= >dreams can work and drive some substantial amount of business.=0A= =0A= I'll admit to knowing nothing about it, but is using the linuxKPI=0A= to port Linux drivers into FreeBSD feasible?=0A= =0A= Obviously, given the size of the Linux community, it seems=0A= more likely that it will have a driver that handles many chip=0A= variants, plus updates for newer chips, I think.=0A= =0A= I do agree that having drivers that at least work for the=0A= basics (maybe no Netmap, TSO, or similar) for the=0A= commodity chips would make it easier for new adopters=0A= of FreeBSD. (I avoid the problem by finding old, used=0A= hardware. The variants of Intel PRO1000 and re chips I=0A= have work fine with the drivers in FreeBSD13/14.;-)=0A= =0A= Oh, and if TSO support is questionable, I think it would be=0A= better to leave it disabled and at least generate a warning=0A= when someone enables it, if it can be enabled at all.=0A= =0A= Good luck with it, rick=0A= =0A= Thanks,=0A= =0A= Kyle Evans=0A= =0A= [0] https://reviews.freebsd.org/D18856=0A= [1] https://reviews.freebsd.org/D19433=0A= _______________________________________________=0A= freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list=0A= https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net=0A= To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"=0A= =0A= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Apr 23 13:45:25 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EC415F3F63 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 13:45:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FRbC923NGz4hDg for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 13:45:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 44C4F5F3D35; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 13:45:25 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 448EE5F3E39 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 13:45:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FRbC91Q6fz4gqV for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 13:45:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 23B1E61CD for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 13:45:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 13NDjPSe037886 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 13:45:25 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 13NDjPuQ037885 for net@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 13:45:25 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 247912] [if_bridge] IPv6 ndp does not work across local bridge members Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2021 13:45:24 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.2-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ipv6 X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: d8zNeCFG@aon.at X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2021 13:45:25 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D247912 --- Comment #21 from Martin Birgmeier --- Hi Lutz, It seems I would need FreeBSD 13 for this, right? - I am still at 12.2 -- Martin --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Apr 23 13:57:35 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCE105F4133 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 13:57:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FRbTC5GSlz4hcl for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 13:57:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id B2EB85F3FD5; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 13:57:35 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B174A5F4132 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 13:57:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FRbTC4KMYz4hSK for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 13:57:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 834FC6272 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 13:57:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 13NDvZ04042970 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 13:57:35 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 13NDvZWp042969 for net@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 13:57:35 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 247912] [if_bridge] IPv6 ndp does not work across local bridge members Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2021 13:57:35 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.2-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ipv6 X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: donner@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2021 13:57:35 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D247912 --- Comment #22 from Lutz Donnerhacke --- The ng_bridge(4) node type was implemented in FreeBSD 4.2. I bet it will work in 12.x, too. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Apr 23 14:24:59 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C0245F4AEB for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 14:24:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FRc4q3nCLz4jS4 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 14:24:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 7FDC55F4B22; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 14:24:59 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E88B5F49AE for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 14:24:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FRc4q30hgz4jVK for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 14:24:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A05A69EB for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 14:24:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 13NEOxHJ061207 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 14:24:59 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 13NEOxKY061206 for net@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 14:24:59 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 247912] [if_bridge] IPv6 ndp does not work across local bridge members Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2021 14:24:59 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.2-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ipv6 X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: d8zNeCFG@aon.at X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2021 14:24:59 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D247912 --- Comment #23 from Martin Birgmeier --- Isn't https://reviews.freebsd.org/D24620 needed for this? --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Apr 23 14:33:58 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5105F5F4DE4 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 14:33:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FRcHB1Xm8z4jx6 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 14:33:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 3325A5F4B74; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 14:33:58 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32EA95F49F7 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 14:33:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FRcHB0w8Rz4jx5 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 14:33:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 12A8B6D33 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 14:33:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 13NEXwBZ065903 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 14:33:58 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 13NEXwZf065902 for net@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 14:33:58 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 247912] [if_bridge] IPv6 ndp does not work across local bridge members Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2021 14:33:57 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.2-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ipv6 X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: donner@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2021 14:33:58 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D247912 --- Comment #24 from Lutz Donnerhacke --- Oh, it might be necessary for bhyve VMs. I'm not familiar with this part. I thought about connecting "real" interfaces like eiface inside the VM. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Apr 23 22:12:19 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C4B15E0AD7 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 22:12:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kevin.bowling@kev009.com) Received: from mail-yb1-xb35.google.com (mail-yb1-xb35.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b35]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FRpS240V0z3PD9 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 22:12:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kevin.bowling@kev009.com) Received: by mail-yb1-xb35.google.com with SMTP id g38so57319623ybi.12 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 15:12:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kev009.com; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=BNjeacj1swIq4soEgtpu8IV52v9ZVEVD1tTQs9iPGtI=; b=CKAj/TytB5R1IWbCkOEGaijQt6/+cDKBzS1i8UrRxj/pqqnVVgYqIxf9mgFS919cYk gpuUnp0RgEJaBiMwSwWYCOxlZBCqhRFXH/Obi4p048mrWRpa2/eN8DRiNL5Wsne/4CKh yq8Ie9BfhwyMRhx86oO9jCeTp4R9saPZJTbZM= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=BNjeacj1swIq4soEgtpu8IV52v9ZVEVD1tTQs9iPGtI=; b=QP+QNJgFeA+mygWJUn+0nWHwBTtqDqyHSa4EEjNKePqu+eiu36hRgLXa0Z8yYidn3e zyE7xZdu/KsUdW81/segrrIRfh1nzkW1raUKxW3aQwJo8UHxaMN4NRSBvWtUC6tRqXv5 vFgcP73DoiEYjbcc8rKRMWahrQUIcmzL/PltozeevO7c/0V4Nfxu1vrmkNgJ/maQtAgT TR/G8uA/yHE38FGnO5sjTiS1tUGfkMJwX+XF7Mg7r/7QD4AEHd+kAH26Uz480LMeLTlU tdg2rXl7QNgbxTs7W/0fylkDJOMvB2MfCg+RdZbPMMbJ1jirPePlLXlTiC910o37qU8d GQ5g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533zZi/ELn8dijWwLimoSVDsyiA/nUUVNQ4w8jBefpgjI1nVNw6V qfilayg71fvzP0YT/wxVUXP+iC748TuBVtJ9z16jmw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyI5z5XD6yxN/DQNmELjk7QxkbTn5Q4CXRgidJ7evzjFpzOQbzUGdKb/62E/RoxdIgKcH++2/J3DVX3Oh5nsjs= X-Received: by 2002:a25:d451:: with SMTP id m78mr5638314ybf.391.1619215937391; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 15:12:17 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Kevin Bowling Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2021 15:12:06 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Client Networking Issues / NIC Lab To: Rick Macklem Cc: FreeBSD Net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FRpS240V0z3PD9 X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none (invalid DKIM record) header.d=kev009.com header.s=google header.b=CKAj/Tyt; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of kevin.bowling@kev009.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::b35 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=kevin.bowling@kev009.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.30 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-net@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[kev009.com]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::b35:from:127.0.2.255]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[kev009.com:~]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::b35:from]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-0.999]; R_DKIM_PERMFAIL(0.00)[kev009.com:s=google]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::b35:from]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-net]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2021 22:12:19 -0000 On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 6:19 AM Rick Macklem wrote: > > Kyle Evans wrote: > >On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 12:22 AM Kevin Bowling wrote: > >> > >> Greetings, > >> > >> [... snip ...] > >> > >> Tehuti Networks seems to have gone out of business. Probably not > >> worth worrying about. > >> > > > >That's unfortunate. I had a box of their 10G NICs and I got them to > >put a driver up for review[0][1], but they weren't very responsive and > >the existing codebase was in pretty rough shape. > > > >Beyond that, your #3 seems to be the most appealing. #2 could probably > >work in the mid-to-long term, but we'd likely be better off > >bootstrapping interest with solid community-supported drivers then > >reaching out to vendors once we can demonstrate that plan field of > >dreams can work and drive some substantial amount of business. > > I'll admit to knowing nothing about it, but is using the linuxKPI > to port Linux drivers into FreeBSD feasible? Hi Rick, I did consider this but do not think it makes sense for PCI Ethernet NIC drivers. I will explain my judgement for consideration. In complex systems such as an Ethernet driver, there are intrinsic and extrinsic complexity. The intrinsic properties of an Ethernet driver are small enough that one person can understand them. So we spend a lot of time fighting against extrinsic problems that I outlined in my email. Put in simpler terms, an iflib driver can be written by one person and there are a number of people that are good at this in the community. The intrinsic complexity of the LKPI on top of an Ethernet driver, as well as some license and social problems people have with LKPI lead it to be a worse fit. If you apply this to drm+i915 etc it is illuminating why the Linux KPI is the right approach. The intrinsic properties of the graphics stack are beyond time and practicality for most in the community, the graphics drivers have become labyrinths that most kernel devs don't have internal knowledge of, rival the size of the rest of the kernel, and keeping up is easier if internal code changes can be kept to a minimum. > Obviously, given the size of the Linux community, it seems > more likely that it will have a driver that handles many chip > variants, plus updates for newer chips, I think. I would agree that Linux has a much better Realtek driver. I am familiar with the Linux e1000 series for instance, and although they tend to have most the workarounds the quality is a lot lower than most users realize. > I do agree that having drivers that at least work for the > basics (maybe no Netmap, TSO, or similar) for the > commodity chips would make it easier for new adopters > of FreeBSD. (I avoid the problem by finding old, used > hardware. The variants of Intel PRO1000 and re chips I > have work fine with the drivers in FreeBSD13/14.;-) Having good inbox network drivers is a way for FreeBSD to differentiate itself. I like nice drivers like cxgbe(4), it is a great piece of engineering and to me even artful. Consider some cxgbe so you can test high speeds :) > Oh, and if TSO support is questionable, I think it would be > better to leave it disabled and at least generate a warning > when someone enables it, if it can be enabled at all. I would like to preserve and correct TSO and other offloads as much as possible. There are consequences to half assing it such as burning more electricity than necessary and causing unnecessary HW upgrade/replacement. Of course, where we can't deliver, we should limit the feature set to known good ones. Striking this balance will require more feedback from the community, with faster turnaround time on PRs. > Good luck with it, rick > > Thanks, > > Kyle Evans > > [0] https://reviews.freebsd.org/D18856 > [1] https://reviews.freebsd.org/D19433 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Apr 23 22:35:11 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53C7F5E1505 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 22:35:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FRpyR1ktxz3Q3n for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 22:35:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 39A3E5E1398; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 22:35:11 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 396DF5E1397 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 22:35:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FRpyR15CQz3QKY for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 22:35:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1873B15619 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 22:35:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 13NMZBo8018041 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 22:35:11 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 13NMZBju018040 for net@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 22:35:11 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 241191] route flush panic with RADIX_MPATH Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2021 22:35:11 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: crash, needs-qa X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: melifaro@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: melifaro@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback? mfc-stable12? mfc-stable11? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2021 22:35:11 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D241191 --- Comment #5 from Alexander V. Chernikov --- Hi Andrey, I would like to apologise for the extremely belated reply. Thank you for submitting the fixes for the RADIX_MPATH! Properly-working multipath is a must-have for the modern networking OS. The routing stack got quite a lot of attention in the last year. As a resul= t, the newer FreeBSD versions (starting from 13.0) features rewritten routing stack & multipath implementation. Multipath is now enabled by default. I'd suggest considering trying it out (preferably, 13-stable branch). Unfortunately, I don't have cycles to look & merge the patch to 12-S branch= , so passing the bug back to -net to allow someone else to potentially pick it. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Apr 23 22:35:28 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAD7F5E10FE for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 22:35:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FRpym4dpKz3Q4D for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 22:35:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 9F3025E0B7F; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 22:35:28 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EFBD5E0B7E for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 22:35:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FRpym3HZGz3Q4C for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 22:35:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BB5F15824 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 22:35:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 13NMZSY5018145 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 22:35:28 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 13NMZSKq018144 for net@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 22:35:28 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 241191] route flush panic with RADIX_MPATH Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2021 22:35:28 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: crash, needs-qa X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: melifaro@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback? mfc-stable12? mfc-stable11? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: assigned_to Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2021 22:35:28 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D241191 Alexander V. Chernikov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|melifaro@FreeBSD.org |net@FreeBSD.org --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sat Apr 24 00:37:10 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 661465E36A9 for ; Sat, 24 Apr 2021 00:37:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsd-lists@bsdforge.com) Received: from udns.ultimatedns.net (static-24-113-41-81.wavecable.com [24.113.41.81]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "ultimatedns.net", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FRsg96QlDz3l58 for ; Sat, 24 Apr 2021 00:37:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsd-lists@bsdforge.com) Received: from ultimatedns.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by udns.ultimatedns.net (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTP id 13O0b9bj042508; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 17:37:16 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bsd-lists@bsdforge.com) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2021 17:37:09 -0700 From: Chris To: Kevin Bowling Cc: FreeBSD Net Subject: Re: Client Networking Issues / NIC Lab In-Reply-To: References: User-Agent: UDNSMS/17.0 Message-ID: <3ebc8fb73b610aedfb8f137363dd286a@bsdforge.com> X-Sender: bsd-lists@bsdforge.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FRsg96QlDz3l58 X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.00 / 15.00]; ASN(0.00)[asn:11404, ipnet:24.113.0.0/16, country:US]; local_wl_ip(0.00)[24.113.41.81] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2021 00:37:10 -0000 On 2021-04-22 22:22, Kevin Bowling wrote: > Greetings, > > I have been looking into client networking issues in FreeBSD lately. > To summarize the situation, common NICs like Intel gigabit (e1000 aka > lem(4)/em(4)/igb(4)), Realtek (re(4)), Aquantia, and Tehuti Networks > are unmaintained or not present on FreeBSD. The purpose of this > thread is to gauge whether that matters, and if it does what to do. I > believe it is important because we are losing out on a pipeline of new > contributors by not supporting client hardware well. We risk losing > NAS, firewall, and other embedded users which may not be large enough > to negotiate with these vendors for support or have the volume to do > custom BOMs to avoid risky parts. My opinion has been developed after > researching the drivers, Bugzilla, and various internet forums where > end users exchange advice or ask for help where FreeBSD is the > underlying cause. > > e1000 is in the best shape, with recent vendor involvement, but covers > 20 years of silicon with over 100 chipsets (of which at least 60 are > significant variations). Datasheets are readily available for most of > them, as well as "specification updates" which list errata. There are > chipsets which have been completely broken for several years. More > common, there are cases that lead to user frustration, including with > the most recent hardware. All of the silicon tends to have > significant bugs around PCIe, TSO, NC-SI (IPMI sideband), arbitration > conflicts with ME and more. Intel doesn't patch the microcode on > these, but many of the issues can be worked around in software. > Performing an audit of the driver will take quite a while, and making > and testing changes gives me concern. When we (my previous employer > and team) converted these drivers to iflib, we fixed some of the > common cases for PCIe and TSO issues but only had a handful of chips > to test against, so the driver works better for some and worse or not > at all for others. I have started fixing some of the bugs in > Bugzilla, but I only have a few e1000 variants on hand to test, and I > have an unrelated full time job so this is just occupying limited > spare time as a hobby. > > re(4) is in pretty abhorrent state. All of these chips require > runtime patching of the phy (which I believe is a DSP algorithm that > gets improved over time) and mcu code. That is totally absent in > FreeBSD. A vendor driver exists in net/realtek-re-kmod which contains > the fixups and works alright for many users. This driver cannot be > imported into FreeBSD as is. There is a strange use of the C > PreProcessor which blows up compile time and driver size needlessly. > The out of tree driver has a different set of supported adapters, so > some kind of meld is necessary. Realtek does not provide public chip > documentation, I am trying to see if they will grant NDA access to > contributors. > > Aquantia has an out of tree driver in net/aquantia-atlantic-kmod. The > code is not currently in a place where I'd like to see it in the tree. > I am not really sure how common these are, the company was acquired by > Marvell which is still producing them as a client networking option > while they have other IP for higher end/speed. > > Tehuti Networks seems to have gone out of business. Probably not > worth worrying about. > > 1) Do nothing. This situation has gone on for a while. Users are > somewhat accustomed to purchasing FreeBSD-specific hardware for things > like SOHO gateways and NAS. A lot of people just revert back to Linux > for client use. OpenBSD seems to have more active contribution around > this kind of thing and works better for common cases so that may be > another exit ramp. > > 2) Quantify usage data and beg the vendors for help. This might work > for Intel, however these devices have transferred to a client team at > intel that does not plan to support FreeBSD, and intel does not keep > test systems around long enough to meet FreeBSD user's needs. Realtek > is a similar story, I am unsure how long they hold on to test systems > and would probably need technical guidance to work with the FreeBSD > community. Unsure about Marvell, I've never worked with them. > > 3) Build a NIC lab and focus on building community support. It would > also give the vendors a place to test hardware their labs have purged > (due to IT asset management policies or other bureaucratic blunders). > Set some boundaries like a 15 year window of chipsets which should > cover practical embedded use cases. There are backplane systems > and/or external PCI(e) expansion systems that could be assembled to > house a large number of NICs. It would probably be cheaper than this, > but say a budget of $15000USD is enough to purchase some expansions, a > couple managed switches, and a few dozen common NICs. Community > members may also send in NICs they wish to see supported or undergo > testing. For this to work out long term, there needs to be a quorum > of people interested in collaborating on the issue. There are some > risks around simply setting this up, depending on the configuration, > the bus topology may introduce problems unrelated to the NICs and we'd > probably need some semi-automated device.hints or devctl stuff to keep > from over provisioning system resources (work on a subset of cards at > a time). An interesting extension of this would be a semi-automated > validation setup for subsystem changes (significant driver changes, > iflib, lro, etc). > > 4) ??? Thank you for your efforts here, Kevin. I had intended to shoot a similar note regarding the Realtek nics earlier this week. But got sidelined. I see a great deal of "bad press" on the internet regarding Realtek nics, largely *bsd related, but also from may others as well. We ($work) have had a pretty good experience with them. So much so, that we use them almost exclusively (on FreeBSD). We've found them to be real performers for the dollar. So I was going to send out a message that given our stock of re(4) we could make ourselves available for testing against any work being done on re(4). IOW if we can help in any way. We'll make ourselves available. Thanks again. --Chris > > Regards, > Kevin > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sat Apr 24 22:43:55 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7E155E349F for ; Sat, 24 Apr 2021 22:43:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FSR63578Rz3rmx for ; Sat, 24 Apr 2021 22:43:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id ADB105E3609; Sat, 24 Apr 2021 22:43:55 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD7A15E343E for ; Sat, 24 Apr 2021 22:43:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FSR634HVSz3rZt for ; Sat, 24 Apr 2021 22:43:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 86544BBC for ; Sat, 24 Apr 2021 22:43:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 13OMhtT6060423 for ; Sat, 24 Apr 2021 22:43:55 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 13OMhtok060422 for net@FreeBSD.org; Sat, 24 Apr 2021 22:43:55 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 238411] [igb] wake on lan not working with Intel I210 Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2021 22:43:55 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: IntelNetworking, needs-qa, regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: abraham@gmx.at X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2021 22:43:55 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D238411 Abraham122x changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |abraham@gmx.at --- Comment #8 from Abraham122x --- Compiled new Intel driver igb-2.5.18.tar and also with them WOL is not work= ing. Any idea what could be the issue? --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=