From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sun Apr 25 00:13:26 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19BD75E5620 for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 00:13:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FST5L02cCz3w4F for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 00:13:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id F3A935E561F; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 00:13:25 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F37445E559D for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 00:13:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FST5K6Sgzz3w4D for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 00:13:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D0ECC1E1D for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 00:13:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 13P0DPou002588 for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 00:13:25 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 13P0DPTq002587 for net@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 00:13:25 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 238411] igb(4): Wake on Lan not working with Intel I210 Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2021 00:13:24 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: IntelNetworking, needs-qa, regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: koobs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? mfc-stable13? mfc-stable12? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: flagtypes.name cc short_desc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2021 00:13:26 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D238411 Kubilay Kocak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |maintainer-feedback?(freebs | |d@intel.com), | |mfc-stable13?, | |mfc-stable12? CC| |freebsd@intel.com, | |net@FreeBSD.org Summary|[igb] wake on lan not |igb(4): Wake on Lan not |working with Intel I210 |working with Intel I210 --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sun Apr 25 08:27:50 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 836485FA316 for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 08:27:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FSh3p377wz4rdG for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 08:27:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 6B44C5FA29A; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 08:27:50 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B0DD5F9DDC for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 08:27:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FSh3p2XYPz4rpZ for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 08:27:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A9D41110E for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 08:27:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 13P8RoQm040697 for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 08:27:50 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 13P8Roii040696 for net@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 08:27:50 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 238411] igb(4): Wake on Lan not working with Intel I210 Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2021 08:27:49 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: IntelNetworking, needs-qa, regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: abraham@gmx.at X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? mfc-stable13? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: flagtypes.name Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2021 08:27:50 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D238411 Abraham122x changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|mfc-stable12? | --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sun Apr 25 08:36:16 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 085FF5FA411 for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 08:36:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FShFW6WK0z4rt2 for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 08:36:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id DDB1A5FA58E; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 08:36:15 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC4FD5FA410 for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 08:36:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FShFW5dXgz4sFc for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 08:36:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B095210FE6 for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 08:36:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 13P8aFdj044531 for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 08:36:15 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 13P8aFHT044530 for net@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 08:36:15 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 238411] igb(4): Wake on Lan not working with Intel I210 Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2021 08:36:15 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: IntelNetworking, needs-qa, regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: abraham@gmx.at X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? mfc-stable13? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2021 08:36:16 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D238411 --- Comment #9 from Abraham122x --- A very unprofessional approach I did yesterday, but just as curiosity. The original Intel driver I compiled yesterday are not showing the WOL flags anymore for my NICS. Therefore I commented following "if" source code line= in "if_igb.c": /* APME bit in EEPROM is mapped to WUC.APME */ eeprom_data =3D E1000_READ_REG(&adapter->hw, E1000_WUC) & E1000_WUC_APME; /* if (eeprom_data) */ adapter->wol =3D E1000_WUFC_MAG; After that, when I shut down the machine, the LED's of the NICS where still active (as it should be with WOL). When I sent a WOL magic packet to the NI= C, the corresponding LED of the NIC was flashing. So the packet was arrived and accepted, but unfortunately the machine was not powered on. Does this someone help for further analysis? --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sun Apr 25 14:48:34 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED6676252F2 for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 14:48:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FSrW66CFMz3j5W for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 14:48:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id D31456253DA; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 14:48:34 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2DD46252F1 for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 14:48:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FSrW65W93z3j5V for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 14:48:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB21A15CE3 for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 14:48:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 13PEmYku019800 for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 14:48:34 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 13PEmYvA019799 for net@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 14:48:34 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 238411] igb(4): Wake on Lan not working with Intel I210 Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2021 14:48:34 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: IntelNetworking, needs-qa, regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: yyv83@mail.ru X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? mfc-stable13? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2021 14:48:35 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D238411 --- Comment #10 from Catwoolfii --- I followed your example and commented out the line: https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd-src/blob/releng/13.0/sys/dev/e1000/if_em= .c#L3681 After that, I rebuilt and reinstalled the kernel and wol worked with Intel = I210 hardware. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sun Apr 25 16:42:46 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA1346275F0 for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 16:42:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FSv2t5fG2z3p4b for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 16:42:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id C1D1C627BCA; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 16:42:46 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C19A9627776 for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 16:42:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FSv2t5323z3p2L for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 16:42:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9ECBA178FC for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 16:42:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 13PGgkvn074122 for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 16:42:46 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 13PGgk1o074121 for net@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 16:42:46 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 238411] igb(4): Wake on Lan not working with Intel I210 Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2021 16:42:44 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: IntelNetworking, needs-qa, regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: abraham@gmx.at X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? mfc-stable13? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2021 16:42:46 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D238411 --- Comment #11 from Abraham122x --- Sorry I am no expert in FreeBSD and compiling. I am using an OPNsense installation which is based on FreeBSD 12.1-RELEASE-p15-HBSD. So far I tried various FreeBSD installations and none worked out of-the-box. Currently I managed to compile the "igb-2.5.18.tar.gz" driver and overrode = it using 'if_igb_updated_load=3D"YES"' in my OPNsense installation. The instru= ctions I used are documented here: https://forum.opnsense.org/index.php?topic=3D21517.msg101148#msg101148 Which driver should I use to compile instead? The "em" from Intel (em-7.7.8.tar.gz) are very old. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sun Apr 25 17:14:25 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5F155E086A for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 17:14:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FSvlP53XFz3qS4 for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 17:14:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id ABC835E0C32; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 17:14:25 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB8EF5E09FA for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 17:14:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FSvlP4NVlz3qBX for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 17:14:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 89E7817EAE for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 17:14:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 13PHEPBq087817 for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 17:14:25 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 13PHEPbn087816 for net@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 17:14:25 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 238411] igb(4): Wake on Lan not working with Intel I210 Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2021 17:14:25 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: IntelNetworking, needs-qa, regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: yyv83@mail.ru X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? mfc-stable13? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2021 17:14:25 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D238411 --- Comment #12 from Catwoolfii --- Still using "em" driver. I would suggest building the module from opnsense sources: 1. Download and unpack the source code: wget https://github.com/opnsense/src/archive/refs/heads/stable/21.1.tar.gz tar zxvf 21.1.tar.gz --strip 1 -C /usr/src 2. In these sources, you also need to comment out in file /usr/src/sys/dev/e1000/if_em.c Look like https://github.com/opnsense/src/blob/stable/21.1/sys/dev/e1000/if_em.c#L3661 3. Now you can build new module: cd /usr/src/modules/em make make install New kernel module should appear in /boot/modules --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sun Apr 25 18:27:58 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A34ED5E2B29 for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 18:27:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FSxNG3v6Yz3tbZ for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 18:27:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 859F65E2B28; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 18:27:58 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 855BF5E2B27 for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 18:27:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FSxNG3JGtz3tdP for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 18:27:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6436E18B3E for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 18:27:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 13PIRwVd023300 for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 18:27:58 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 13PIRwa2023299 for net@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 18:27:58 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 255388] [PATCH] Do not forward datagrams original from 169.254.0.0/16 Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2021 18:27:58 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: patch X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: linimon@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: assigned_to cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2021 18:27:58 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D255388 Mark Linimon changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|bugs@FreeBSD.org |net@FreeBSD.org CC|bms@FreeBSD.org | --- Comment #2 from Mark Linimon --- ^Triage: assign to mailing list. Note that original committer is no longer working on FreeBSD. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sun Apr 25 19:11:34 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6914E5E3F25 for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 19:11:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FSyLZ2M41z4Qps for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 19:11:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 4F1485E3C48; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 19:11:34 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EDB15E3C47 for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 19:11:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FSyLZ1gWdz4QxZ for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 19:11:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2CF3019A82 for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 19:11:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 13PJBYeV045860 for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 19:11:34 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 13PJBYCO045859 for net@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 19:11:34 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 238411] igb(4): Wake on Lan not working with Intel I210 Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2021 19:11:32 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: IntelNetworking, needs-qa, regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: kaho@elam.kais.kyoto-u.ac.jp X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? mfc-stable13? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2021 19:11:34 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D238411 Kaho Toshikazu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kaho@elam.kais.kyoto-u.ac.j | |p --- Comment #13 from Kaho Toshikazu --- (In reply to Abraham122x from comment #9) These lines check the enable bit of WOL in the flash ROM. If you would like to neglect flash ROM setting, I think your suggestion is reasonable. If the default of WOL is still disabled when WOL is diabled on the flash RO= M, you should not change these lines. In the function em_enable_wakeup(),=20 if ((if_getcapenable(ifp) & IFCAP_WOL_MAGIC) =3D=3D 0) adapter->wol &=3D ~E1000_WUFC_MAG; after these line, please insert like this, else adapter->wol |=3D E1000_WUFC_MAG; if you don't want to change default settings. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sun Apr 25 21:00:23 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F48A5EBA39 for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 21:00:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FT0m66VGxz4cT3 for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 21:00:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id DE44F5EB765; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 21:00:22 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDAFC5EB764 for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 21:00:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FT0m64xk6z4ckw for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 21:00:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9CE0E1B08D for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 21:00:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 13PL0MG9095780 for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 21:00:22 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from bugzilla@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 13PL0MK1095779 for net@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 21:00:22 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <202104252100.13PL0MK1095779@kenobi.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: bugzilla set sender to bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: Problem reports for net@FreeBSD.org that need special attention Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2021 21:00:22 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.34 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2021 21:00:23 -0000 To view an individual PR, use: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=(Bug Id). The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users, which need special attention. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and obsolete releases. Status | Bug Id | Description ------------+-----------+--------------------------------------------------- In Progress | 221146 | [ixgbe] Problem with second laggport New | 204438 | setsockopt() handling of kern.ipc.maxsockbuf limi New | 213410 | [carp] service netif restart causes hang only whe Open | 7556 | ppp: sl_compress_init() will fail if called anyth Open | 193452 | Dell PowerEdge 210 II -- Kernel panic bce (broadc Open | 194453 | dummynet(4): pipe config bw parameter limited to Open | 200319 | Bridge+CARP crashes/freezes Open | 202510 | [CARP] advertisements sourced from CARP IP cause Open | 207261 | netmap: Doesn't do TX sync with kqueue Open | 217978 | dhclient: Support supersede statement for option Open | 222273 | igb(4): Kernel panic (fatal trap 12) due to netwo Open | 225438 | panic in6_unlink_ifa() due to race Open | 227720 | Kernel panic in ppp server Open | 230807 | if_alc(4): Driver not working for Killer Networki Open | 236888 | ppp daemon: Allow MTU to be overridden for PPPoE Open | 236983 | bnxt(4) VLAN not operational unless explicit "ifc Open | 237072 | netgraph(4): performance issue [on HardenedBSD]? Open | 237840 | Removed dummynet dependency on ipfw Open | 238324 | Add XG-C100C/AQtion AQC107 10GbE NIC driver Open | 238707 | Lock order reversal: rtentry vs "nd6 list" Open | 240944 | em(4): Crash with Intel 82571EB NIC with AMD Pile Open | 241106 | tun/ppp: panic: vm_fault: fault on nofault entry Open | 241162 | Panic in closefp() triggered by nginx (uwsgi with Open | 243463 | ix0: Watchdog timeout Open | 244066 | divert: Add sysctls for divert socket send and re Open | 118111 | rc: network.subr Add MAC address based interface 26 problems total for which you should take action. From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sun Apr 25 21:29:24 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 517705ED52F for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 21:29:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FT1Pc1gK7z4fFt for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 21:29:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 377375ED52E; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 21:29:24 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 373D55ED176 for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 21:29:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FT1Pc0zv6z4fRR for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 21:29:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 10C641B1D6 for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 21:29:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 13PLTN3E008252 for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 21:29:23 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 13PLTNQx008251 for net@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 21:29:23 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 238411] igb(4): Wake on Lan not working with Intel I210 Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2021 21:29:24 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: IntelNetworking, needs-qa, regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: abraham@gmx.at X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? mfc-stable13? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2021 21:29:24 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D238411 --- Comment #14 from Abraham122x --- @Catwoolfii, thanks for guiding me how to compile. I managed it and now WOL= is working on my machine as well. This is really great! @Kaho, I tried your suggestion and can confirm that also this source-code change works. Could we now also find the root cause of this issue resp. make me understand why this is not working properly? I see that this if statement=20 if ((if_getcapenable(ifp) & IFCAP_WOL_MAGIC) =3D=3D 0) seems to be always false in my case, although in the interface capabilities= and options the WOL_MAGIC flag is set. I will try some different source code variants to understand which paramete= r is causing my problem. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sun Apr 25 22:27:24 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 196D95EE6AE for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 22:27:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FT2hW71Sfz4hWr for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 22:27:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id EEFAA5EE6AD; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 22:27:23 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEC095EE3F1 for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 22:27:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FT2hW6LQcz4hJW for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 22:27:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CCFEF1C0DD for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 22:27:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 13PMRNik037595 for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 22:27:23 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 13PMRNqK037594 for net@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 22:27:23 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 238411] igb(4): Wake on Lan not working with Intel I210 Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2021 22:27:22 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: IntelNetworking, needs-qa, regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: kaho@elam.kais.kyoto-u.ac.jp X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? mfc-stable13? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2021 22:27:24 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D238411 --- Comment #15 from Kaho Toshikazu --- (In reply to Abraham122x from comment #14) > I see that this if statement=20 > if ((if_getcapenable(ifp) & IFCAP_WOL_MAGIC) =3D=3D 0) > seems to be always false in my case, although in the interface capabiliti= es and options the WOL_MAGIC flag is set. It is not correct, "adapter->wol" is always 0, if the flash ROM disables WOL regardless the device has a WOL functionality. The definition IGB_CAPS has IFCAP_WOL flag, and the igb device is always reported WOL capable to system, and ifconfig command can set or unset WOL flags. But if the flash ROM indicates WOL disabled, the variable adapter->wol is always 0 regardless indicating WOL enabled in the variable isc_capenable. The isc_capenable preserves status which flags are enabled or disabled. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sun Apr 25 23:03:21 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C8425EF0F4 for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 23:03:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FT3V12T0rz4jmG for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 23:03:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 54B1D5EF0F2; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 23:03:21 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 535945EF58E for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 23:03:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FT3V11nM4z4jbR for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 23:03:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3099A1CAA1 for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 23:03:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 13PN3LbC055081 for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 23:03:21 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 13PN3LCx055080 for net@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 23:03:21 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 238411] igb(4): Wake on Lan not working with Intel I210 Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2021 23:03:18 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: IntelNetworking, needs-qa, regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: abraham@gmx.at X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? mfc-stable13? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2021 23:03:21 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D238411 --- Comment #16 from Abraham122x --- Let's ask differently in reference to the non-modified FreeBSD drivers.=20 Regardless if I set "ifconfig igb0 wol" or not, I cannot enable the WOL fea= ture on my NICS. So for me it's not clear with which functionality from OS perspective I can influence the field "adapter->wol". My only workaround I found is to change the variable directly in the source code of the driver and overrule it. What I see from my theoretical analysis, the variables are stored in ROM at shutdown -> method "em_enable_phy_wakeup": E1000_WRITE_REG(hw, E1000_WUC, E1000_WUC_PHY_WAKE | E1000_WUC_PME_EN | E1000_WUC_APME); E1000_WRITE_REG(hw, E1000_WUFC, adapter->wol); At startup the register is read again: apme_mask =3D E1000_WUC_APME; eeprom_data =3D E1000_READ_REG(&adapter->hw, E1000_WUC); if (eeprom_data & apme_mask) adapter->wol =3D (E1000_WUFC_MAG | E1000_WUFC_MC); As the variable "adapter->wol" at startup seems to be zero, it means that t= he flag E1000_WUC_APME is not set, although it was written at shutdown. So seen from my hardware perspective, the ROM settings are not properly recognized at startup, hence "adapter->wol" is always zero. The variable ca= nnot be influenced by anything known to me. Is my analysis correct? Did I miss something? P.S: I have an E1000_DEV_ID_I210_COPPER_FLASHLESS installed. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sun Apr 25 23:59:25 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8B895EFAFB for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 23:59:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FT4kj5c6rz4l0G for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 23:59:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id BE4565EFAFA; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 23:59:25 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE0425EF95C for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 23:59:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FT4kj4t2fz4l0F for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 23:59:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 95D091D689 for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 23:59:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 13PNxP00078123 for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 23:59:25 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 13PNxPg1078122 for net@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 23:59:25 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 238411] igb(4): Wake on Lan not working with Intel I210 Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2021 23:59:25 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: IntelNetworking, needs-qa, regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: kaho@elam.kais.kyoto-u.ac.jp X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? mfc-stable13? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2021 23:59:25 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D238411 --- Comment #17 from Kaho Toshikazu --- (In reply to Abraham122x from comment #16) Yes, I think your analysis is correct. i210 flashless is always disabled WOL at first time on booting form power off. FreeBSD igb driver picks up the status of WOL, and the variable adapter->wol is initialized to 0. If adapter->wol is 0, the function "em_enable_phy_wakeup" is not called, then WOL is not enabled. comment #9 suggests to initialize adapter->wol to E1000_WUFC_MAG instead of= 0. comment #13 suggests to rewrite adapter->wol if WOL is enabled in the flags. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Mon Apr 26 01:02:44 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 359F75F0F46 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 01:02:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FT67m0s7Yz4nfS for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 01:02:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 1B9725F0FBF; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 01:02:44 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B5C55F1314 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 01:02:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FT67m0D3Wz4ncC for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 01:02:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EED331E26F for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 01:02:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 13Q12hTx009993 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 01:02:43 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 13Q12hpI009992 for net@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 01:02:43 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 238411] igb(4): Wake on Lan not working with Intel I210 Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2021 01:02:44 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: IntelNetworking, needs-qa, regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: koobs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? mfc-stable13? mfc-stable12? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: flagtypes.name Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2021 01:02:44 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D238411 Kubilay Kocak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |mfc-stable12? --- Comment #18 from Kubilay Kocak --- ^Triage: Original report for 12.0, set mfc-* accordingly unless positive evidence provided its not an issue or reproducible on stable/12 --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Mon Apr 26 01:44:51 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 253435F1DA0 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 01:44:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FT74M0Mz3z4prP for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 01:44:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 0AA595F1D30; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 01:44:51 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A6C65F2000 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 01:44:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FT74L6nFwz4prM for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 01:44:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DAFC81E9B8 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 01:44:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 13Q1ioIZ027510 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 01:44:50 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 13Q1io7s027508 for net@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 01:44:50 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 255388] netinet/ip_input.c: Do not forward datagrams original from 169.254.0.0/16 Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2021 01:44:50 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-qa X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: koobs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: keywords bug_status bug_file_loc short_desc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2021 01:44:51 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D255388 Kubilay Kocak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords|patch |needs-qa Status|New |Open URL| |https://reviews.freebsd.org | |/D29968 Summary|[PATCH] Do not forward |netinet/ip_input.c: Do not |datagrams original from |forward datagrams original |169.254.0.0/16 |from 169.254.0.0/16 --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Mon Apr 26 02:02:42 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1610C5F203A for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 02:02:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FT7Sx72zhz4qLn for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 02:02:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id F1D815F2039; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 02:02:41 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1A0B5F2038 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 02:02:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FT7Sx6SR4z4qd7 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 02:02:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D10D51EE3E for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 02:02:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 13Q22feF034559 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 02:02:41 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 13Q22fEF034558 for net@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 02:02:41 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 238411] igb(4): Wake on Lan not working with Intel I210 Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2021 02:02:41 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: IntelNetworking, needs-qa, regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: kaho@elam.kais.kyoto-u.ac.jp X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? mfc-stable13? mfc-stable12? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2021 02:02:42 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D238411 --- Comment #19 from Kaho Toshikazu --- (In reply to Kubilay Kocak from comment #18) See also bug #208343, comment #54 . --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Mon Apr 26 05:28:14 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AFA45F50B9 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 05:28:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FTD260X7Tz4yxR for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 05:28:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 0FD915F50B8; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 05:28:14 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E8F95F5053 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 05:28:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FTD256r8Bz500x for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 05:28:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DDC1B21AB9 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 05:28:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 13Q5SDds029280 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 05:28:13 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 13Q5SDsN029279 for net@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 05:28:13 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 241191] route flush panic with RADIX_MPATH Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2021 05:28:13 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: crash, needs-qa X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: dl@CyberPunk.ru X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback? mfc-stable12? mfc-stable11? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2021 05:28:14 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D241191 --- Comment #6 from Andrey Linkevich --- Hello, Alexander. We will definitely check the 13. Thanks/ --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Mon Apr 26 17:55:46 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 669AD5EA275 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 17:55:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FTXcf2GmTz3vLf for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 17:55:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 4DFED5EA273; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 17:55:46 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DC835EA272 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 17:55:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FTXcf1gSCz3vJW for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 17:55:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C9353CC5 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 17:55:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 13QHtk4e063356 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 17:55:46 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 13QHtk88063355 for net@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 17:55:46 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 238411] igb(4): Wake on Lan not working with Intel I210 Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2021 17:55:45 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: IntelNetworking, needs-qa, regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: abraham@gmx.at X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? mfc-stable13? mfc-stable12? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2021 17:55:46 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D238411 --- Comment #20 from Abraham122x --- Not sure if any action is required from my side. I am not familiar with the mfc-* flags. For myself I will change the driver to my needs, but I hope that some expert can solve the bug for everybody facing this issue.=20 In case I can help, please let me know. Happy to support. FYI, I tried a lot of versions between FreeBSD 11 and 13. Everywhere the sa= me issue with my hardware. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Mon Apr 26 20:06:04 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B98B75EED88 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 20:06:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FTbW04hTvz4WtR for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 20:06:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 9F13D5EEB16; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 20:06:04 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EDBF5EEE00 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 20:06:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FTbW042YVz4Wcc for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 20:06:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7E2D754E9 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 20:06:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 13QK64v7020505 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 20:06:04 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 13QK64hE020504 for net@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 20:06:04 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 248005] nd6 initializes nd_ifinfo->maxmtu = 0 on newly inserted network interfaces Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2021 20:06:04 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: easy X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: ae@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: kevans@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback? mfc-stable12+ mfc-stable11- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2021 20:06:04 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D248005 Andrey V. Elsukov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ae@FreeBSD.org --- Comment #5 from Andrey V. Elsukov --- After this patch IPv6 link prefix routes on vlan(4) interfaces have 1500 MTU instead of MTU configured on vlan, i.e. after upgrade all IPv6 link prefix routes have 1500 MTU instead of 9000. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Mon Apr 26 20:19:50 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 280EE5EEF7A for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 20:19:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FTbpt0P5Nz4XdL for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 20:19:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 0BB185EF2F5; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 20:19:50 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B75F5EEF79 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 20:19:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FTbps6XKxz4XdK for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 20:19:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D424F5A70 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 20:19:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 13QKJngr029329 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 20:19:49 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 13QKJnq6029328 for net@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 20:19:49 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 230996] em/igb: Intel i210/i350: ifconfig: enabling "vlanhwtag" renders VLAN on i210/i350 NICs unusable Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2021 20:19:48 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: IntelNetworking, needs-qa, performance, regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: brock@cottonwoodcomputer.com X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? mfc-stable12? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2021 20:19:50 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D230996 Brock Williams changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |brock@cottonwoodcomputer.co | |m --- Comment #20 from Brock Williams --- We're seeing the same, or at least very similar, issue on 13.0-RELEASE. In= our case, we only have the problem if the port is in gigabit mode. If we limit= the switch to 100, we don't see the issue. Our configuration is passing a vlan over a bridge interface: ifconfig_igb0=3D"DHCP" ifconfig_igb1=3D"inet 172.28.1.1 netmask 255.255.255.0" dhcpd_ifaces=3D"igb1" vlans_igb0=3D"1501" vlans_igb1=3D"1501" ifconfig_igb0_1501=3D"up" ifconfig_igb1_1501=3D"up" cloned_interfaces=3D"bridge0" ifconfig_bridge0=3D"addm igb0.1501 addm igb1.1501 up" Adding -vlanhwtag to igb0 and igb1 resolves it. pciconf -lv: igb0@pci0:2:0:0: class=3D0x020000 rev=3D0x03 hdr=3D0x00 vendor=3D0x8= 086 device=3D0x1533 subvendor=3D0x15d9 subdevice=3D0x1533 vendor =3D 'Intel Corporation' device =3D 'I210 Gigabit Network Connection' class =3D network subclass =3D ethernet --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Mon Apr 26 23:02:26 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD3095F326D for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 23:02:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FTgQV5kQXz4gfT for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 23:02:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id C45F95F3551; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 23:02:26 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C426E5F3718 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 23:02:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FTgQV5703z4gT7 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 23:02:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A373C7B7C for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 23:02:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 13QN2Qdn007209 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 23:02:26 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 13QN2QKu007208 for net@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 23:02:26 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 255430] ng_bridge don't sends broadcast packet to first found link in case of error in other links Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2021 23:02:26 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: linimon@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: assigned_to Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2021 23:02:26 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D255430 Mark Linimon changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|bugs@FreeBSD.org |net@FreeBSD.org --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Mon Apr 26 23:10:24 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B3AA5F3C2D for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 23:10:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FTgbh0583z4h32 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 23:10:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 02EDC5F3AE3; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 23:10:24 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02BA25F3C2C for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 23:10:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FTgbg6cw0z4gxj for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 23:10:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D6F927E2F for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 23:10:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 13QNANJ0008420 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 23:10:23 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 13QNANaJ008419 for net@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 23:10:23 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 255319] re0: link state changed to DOWN / UP Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2021 23:10:23 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.2-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: linimon@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: assigned_to Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2021 23:10:24 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D255319 Mark Linimon changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|bugs@FreeBSD.org |net@FreeBSD.org --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Mon Apr 26 23:45:29 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B913E5F4B85 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 23:45:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FThN94hYzz4jfj for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 23:45:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 9F3735F4A36; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 23:45:29 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EF9B5F47C1 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 23:45:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FThN9447Rz4jfh for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 23:45:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D9A91067E for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 23:45:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 13QNjTJ2025147 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 23:45:29 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 13QNjT4U025146 for net@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 23:45:29 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 255319] re0: link state changed to DOWN / UP Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2021 23:45:29 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.2-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: portmaster@bsdforge.com X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2021 23:45:29 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D255319 --- Comment #1 from Chris Hutchinson --- See also: bug #166724 --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Apr 27 02:20:38 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAF725FA963 for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 02:20:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FTlqB4jdGz4rhk for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 02:20:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id A1C5E5FA962; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 02:20:38 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A19255FA8A5 for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 02:20:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FTlqB46k9z4rbr for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 02:20:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 80A9D12B81 for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 02:20:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 13R2KcoH097734 for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 02:20:38 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 13R2Kcnt097733 for net@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 02:20:38 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 230996] em/igb: Intel i210/i350: ifconfig: enabling "vlanhwtag" renders VLAN on i210/i350 NICs unusable Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2021 02:20:38 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: IntelNetworking, needs-qa, performance, regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: kbowling@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? mfc-stable12? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2021 02:20:38 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D230996 Kevin Bowling changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kbowling@freebsd.org --- Comment #21 from Kevin Bowling --- Can all of you test this https://reviews.freebsd.org/D30002 - no guarantees= but there were some obvious problems to fix. Aaron, your issue I am not sure about. It looks completely unrelated to networking. Can you capture a crash dump? --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Apr 27 06:11:18 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5D96621CDB for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 06:11:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ozkan.kirik@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vs1-xe2c.google.com (mail-vs1-xe2c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::e2c]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FTrxK6Chjz3JMj; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 06:11:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ozkan.kirik@gmail.com) Received: by mail-vs1-xe2c.google.com with SMTP id 2so29494205vsh.4; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 23:11:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=cUXnXbUtflGSrfxtZDxMTjwtdBDtMZ43gda6NiISEcQ=; b=CMpKbWDAQcgZ7EZt2l6GZoA00qbpntjfGKIFo0iY6GfdbZoVd3tC9KNiT3ND0clfO6 jEPdOq8CXXU9pIdUrv6citsDR4kZE4ZMc7Hzr5wKgpeVf3Td5Mx5JWTIJXDEeIzWERIY VOI1EUMafooixojtb4ywfRUdF5gdHgc3eovaWqXfq+6CWPOslDLIOrkYvqiXQg//MpUt pylMOBiHigftiMP/ydLnghxpV+Ckgxbjsi0wmk2RlQRICxZctsGeWrRWYtVEUZQWZ4Yj qkch2DXX+mw8uCaCBp69WvdCMamyp8MEDyId2aURn0kB86NtXqo2q+7LKyw1vvWbCdJD 3XNg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=cUXnXbUtflGSrfxtZDxMTjwtdBDtMZ43gda6NiISEcQ=; b=mT4wo6V6JSMDuAbwSe7eX3jMNXV6JIX2FRKhRuHT+o+dNP3nTB4Xq7EUYDqnpf6Sfj Wve6po4XZEgEVFrONe9kllSvbw/6MC33GTLFvhic10Aa3OzY8+C+CeJa8KWdNUv9w1nR EobWw+RdjHluvOFEdQ2DXeeBIxrIP1gjE7AzOXZizy3oMOeHKpEYNFZIz2DalPE8smjz P4FL95Ku4tuAKxx9W7F3sf6x/k5ECoyFrmwx0gugK0JoFmVfYc6BK3w5ttWp0pNdXUhS LFbV4WXzLRcj6bYrQUmQexgBJd6pQD1vWIUtLvdiuFDxf1pQRjWM4/j6sRBXd+XNFp18 eV+w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533tiNmNH9cp6+v3dOXSSdVABQO6t4GIon/YElsXrTbjYoCCDsKG S8HyGFcEi8byShF7w+sZmFufdJvTrWVfeqbV9rPJuGN4Xlc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwQ60mA/YipSBzbm1L1o7O+Rj3IUXP2lYgN5qBo6a6LyP2Twi237lqG9T9Fol0hKOEAAB+6UAApzGy6Wn5VHGA= X-Received: by 2002:a67:f693:: with SMTP id n19mr15755958vso.55.1619503875560; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 23:11:15 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: =?UTF-8?B?w5Z6a2FuIEtJUklL?= Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2021 09:11:03 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Chelsio T62100 - CCR : Device not configured To: FreeBSD Net Cc: np@freebsd.org, John Baldwin X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FTrxK6Chjz3JMj X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=CMpKbWDA; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of ozkankirik@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::e2c as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=ozkankirik@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.37 / 15.00]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36]; URI_COUNT_ODD(1.00)[1]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; R_MIXED_CHARSET(0.62)[subject]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com:dkim]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::e2c:from]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::e2c:from:127.0.2.255]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::e2c:from]; HTTP_TO_IP(1.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-net] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.34 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2021 06:11:18 -0000 Hello, I'have a Chelsio T62100-LP-CR card. I want to use IPsec acceleration. I'm using FreeBSD stable/12 (built on 2021-04-12). But when using setkey, I got "Device not configured" error. What is the right way to use it ? I'm using both if_ipsec and strongswan. How to repeat: # kldload ccr # dmesg | grep ccr ccr0: numa-domain 0 on t6nex0 # pciconf -lv t6iov0@pci0:59:0:0: class=0x020000 card=0x00001425 chip=0x60071425 rev=0x00 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Chelsio Communications Inc' device = 'T62100-LP-CR Unified Wire Ethernet Controller' class = network subclass = ethernet t6iov1@pci0:59:0:1: class=0x020000 card=0x00001425 chip=0x60071425 rev=0x00 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Chelsio Communications Inc' device = 'T62100-LP-CR Unified Wire Ethernet Controller' class = network subclass = ethernet t6iov2@pci0:59:0:2: class=0x020000 card=0x00001425 chip=0x60071425 rev=0x00 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Chelsio Communications Inc' device = 'T62100-LP-CR Unified Wire Ethernet Controller' class = network subclass = ethernet t6iov3@pci0:59:0:3: class=0x020000 card=0x00001425 chip=0x60071425 rev=0x00 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Chelsio Communications Inc' device = 'T62100-LP-CR Unified Wire Ethernet Controller' class = network subclass = ethernet t6nex0@pci0:59:0:4: class=0x020000 card=0x00001425 chip=0x64071425 rev=0x00 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Chelsio Communications Inc' device = 'T62100-LP-CR Unified Wire Ethernet Controller' class = network subclass = ethernet none110@pci0:59:0:5: class=0x010000 card=0x00001425 chip=0x65071425 rev=0x00 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Chelsio Communications Inc' device = 'T62100-LP-CR Unified Wire Storage Controller' class = mass storage subclass = SCSI none111@pci0:59:0:6: class=0x0c0400 card=0x00001425 chip=0x66071425 rev=0x00 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Chelsio Communications Inc' device = 'T62100-LP-CR Unified Wire Storage Controller' class = serial bus subclass = Fibre Channel # ifconfig ipsec0 create reqid 100 # ifconfig ipsec0 inet tunnel 192.168.0.3 192.168.0.5 # ifconfig ipsec0 inet 172.16.0.3/16 172.16.0.5 # cat > setket.conf add 192.168.0.3 192.168.0.5 esp 10000 -m tunnel -u 100 -E rijndael-cbc "VerySecureKey!!1"; add 192.168.0.5 192.168.0.3 esp 10001 -m tunnel -u 100 -E rijndael-cbc "VerySecureKey!!2"; ^D # setkey -vcf setkey.conf sadb_msg{ version=2 type=3(ADD) errno=0 satype=3 len=15 reserved=0 seq=0 pid=90711 sadb_ext{ len=3 type=9(KEY_ENCRYPT) } sadb_key{ bits=128 reserved=0 key= 56657279 53656375 72654b65 79212131 } sadb_ext{ len=2 type=1(SA) } sadb_sa{ spi=10000 replay=0 state=0 auth=0 encrypt=12 flags=0x00000040 } sadb_ext{ len=2 type=19(SA2) } sadb_x_sa2{ mode=2 reqid=100 reserved1=128 reserved2=26960 sequence=2048 } sadb_ext{ len=3 type=5(ADDRESS_SRC) } sadb_address{ proto=255 prefixlen=32 reserved=0x0000 } sockaddr{ len=16 family=2 addr=192.168.0.3 } sadb_ext{ len=3 type=6(ADDRESS_DST) } sadb_address{ proto=255 prefixlen=32 reserved=0x0000 } sockaddr{ len=16 family=2 addr=192.168.0.5 } sadb_msg{ version=2 type=3(ADD) errno=6 satype=3 len=15 reserved=0 seq=0 pid=90711 sadb_ext{ len=3 type=9(KEY_ENCRYPT) } sadb_key{ bits=128 reserved=0 key= 56657279 53656375 72654b65 79212131 } sadb_ext{ len=2 type=1(SA) } sadb_sa{ spi=10000 replay=0 state=0 auth=0 encrypt=12 flags=0x00000040 } sadb_ext{ len=2 type=19(SA2) } sadb_x_sa2{ mode=2 reqid=100 reserved1=128 reserved2=26960 sequence=2048 } sadb_ext{ len=3 type=5(ADDRESS_SRC) } sadb_address{ proto=255 prefixlen=32 reserved=0x0000 } sockaddr{ len=16 family=2 addr=192.168.0.3 } sadb_ext{ len=3 type=6(ADDRESS_DST) } sadb_address{ proto=255 prefixlen=32 reserved=0x0000 } sockaddr{ len=16 family=2 addr=192.168.0.5 } The result of line 1: Device not configured. sadb_msg{ version=2 type=3(ADD) errno=0 satype=3 len=15 reserved=0 seq=0 pid=90711 sadb_ext{ len=3 type=9(KEY_ENCRYPT) } sadb_key{ bits=128 reserved=0 key= 56657279 53656375 72654b65 79212132 } sadb_ext{ len=2 type=1(SA) } sadb_sa{ spi=10001 replay=0 state=0 auth=0 encrypt=12 flags=0x00000040 } sadb_ext{ len=2 type=19(SA2) } sadb_x_sa2{ mode=2 reqid=100 reserved1=0 reserved2=26961 sequence=2048 } sadb_ext{ len=3 type=5(ADDRESS_SRC) } sadb_address{ proto=255 prefixlen=32 reserved=0x0000 } sockaddr{ len=16 family=2 addr=192.168.0.5 } sadb_ext{ len=3 type=6(ADDRESS_DST) } sadb_address{ proto=255 prefixlen=32 reserved=0x0000 } sockaddr{ len=16 family=2 addr=192.168.0.3 } sadb_msg{ version=2 type=3(ADD) errno=6 satype=3 len=15 reserved=0 seq=0 pid=90711 sadb_ext{ len=3 type=9(KEY_ENCRYPT) } sadb_key{ bits=128 reserved=0 key= 56657279 53656375 72654b65 79212132 } sadb_ext{ len=2 type=1(SA) } sadb_sa{ spi=10001 replay=0 state=0 auth=0 encrypt=12 flags=0x00000040 } sadb_ext{ len=2 type=19(SA2) } sadb_x_sa2{ mode=2 reqid=100 reserved1=0 reserved2=26961 sequence=2048 } sadb_ext{ len=3 type=5(ADDRESS_SRC) } sadb_address{ proto=255 prefixlen=32 reserved=0x0000 } sockaddr{ len=16 family=2 addr=192.168.0.5 } sadb_ext{ len=3 type=6(ADDRESS_DST) } sadb_address{ proto=255 prefixlen=32 reserved=0x0000 } sockaddr{ len=16 family=2 addr=192.168.0.3 } The result of line 2: Device not configured. Thanks! From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Apr 27 07:16:04 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94D096233B5 for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 07:16:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FTtN43P9gz3MR4 for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 07:16:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 7162D623063; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 07:16:04 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7111F623062 for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 07:16:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FTtN41Xk2z3MTL for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 07:16:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 23AEF16647 for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 07:16:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 13R7G4DI039918 for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 07:16:04 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 13R7G41W039917 for net@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 07:16:04 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 255430] ng_bridge don't sends broadcast packet to first found link in case of error in other links Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2021 07:16:04 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: donner@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: donner@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc assigned_to Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2021 07:16:04 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D255430 Lutz Donnerhacke changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |donner@FreeBSD.org Assignee|net@FreeBSD.org |donner@FreeBSD.org --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Apr 27 08:37:29 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52951625C8C for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 08:37:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FTwB11hBdz3R2K for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 08:37:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 39C7C62587C; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 08:37:29 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 398BF625A6D for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 08:37:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FTwB1138Bz3R0D for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 08:37:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1708817951 for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 08:37:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 13R8bTM8079386 for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 08:37:29 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 13R8bT9l079385 for net@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 08:37:29 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 248005] nd6 initializes nd_ifinfo->maxmtu = 0 on newly inserted network interfaces Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2021 08:37:29 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: easy X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: ae@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: kevans@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback+ maintainer-feedback? mfc-stable12+ mfc-stable11- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2021 08:37:29 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D248005 --- Comment #6 from Andrey V. Elsukov --- How it worked before patch: # ifconfig vlan1000 create vlandev mce3 vlan 1000 up # ifconfig vlan1000 vlan1000: flags=3D8843 metric 0 mtu= 9000 =20=20=20=20=20=20=20 options=3D1c680003 ether 24:8a:07:b4:32:43 inet6 fe80::268a:7ff:feb4:3243%vlan1000 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x8 groups: vlan vlan: 1000 vlanpcp: 0 parent interface: mce3 media: Ethernet autoselect (100GBase-= CR4 ) status: active nd6 options=3D21 # netstat -Wrnf inet6 | grep vlan1000 fe80::%vlan1000/64 link#8 U = 11=20=20 9000 vlan1000 fe80::268a:7ff:feb4:3243%vlan1000 link#3 UHS = 1=20 16384 lo0 # ndp -i vlan1000 linkmtu=3D0, maxmtu=3D0, curhlim=3D64, basereachable=3D30s0ms, reachable=3D= 27s, retrans=3D1s0ms Flags: nud auto_linklocal=20 After this patch: # netstat -Wrnf inet6 | grep vlan1000 fe80::%vlan1000/64 link#8 U = 11=20=20 1500 vlan1000 fe80::268a:7ff:feb4:3243%vlan1000 link#3 UHS = 1=20 16384 lo0 # ndp -i vlan1000 linkmtu=3D0, maxmtu=3D1500, curhlim=3D64, basereachable=3D30s0ms, reachable= =3D18s, retrans=3D1s0ms Flags: nud auto_linklocal --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Apr 27 10:51:02 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFD9B5E2555 for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 10:51:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FTz866HQPz3pDV for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 10:51:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id D7B8B5E2554; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 10:51:02 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D78045E29B2 for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 10:51:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FTz865hN7z3pPs for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 10:51:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B671319566 for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 10:51:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 13RAp2m0044309 for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 10:51:02 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 13RAp23u044308 for net@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 10:51:02 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 255430] ng_bridge don't sends broadcast packet to first found link in case of error in other links Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2021 10:51:03 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: rgrimes@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: donner@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2021 10:51:03 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D255430 Rodney W. Grimes changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |net@FreeBSD.org --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Apr 27 13:57:02 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43F3E5F26B0 for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 13:57:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ozkan.kirik@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vk1-xa2c.google.com (mail-vk1-xa2c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::a2c]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FV3Gj2wQvz4Tgp for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 13:57:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ozkan.kirik@gmail.com) Received: by mail-vk1-xa2c.google.com with SMTP id u200so10364317vku.3 for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 06:57:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=kfMjk7daXZ3/jPk6LmtxlSDZcV4VmU7NehyBsu+HAdk=; b=deHXG8qseHDrBE1Li9+5vWz+Wg+fH1ukdDnXyWpt+poP9kgNfNc2rwsURquDbOm1S5 2DpB3Vn5jivzyJAkoaU78AQPAI6sqhM7Oj1ZTfDc8scxlXfaaISD2B/3xZe6ShsI++Tj 5lLxfF9Z+2ByOQ4SFo26wDg6ShkgckiUNscsDjrLU1nB/jy+QSa9jDUFWiSU6TP7jmnz R/vhY9C9LdlTpLqSsHAV72K/SbZHjL/OfJZUrP9VEb4aIQJxQvO7qWrib1nBDzp+PFzE MmtXW1m/cGl6Q0witKnkPQu+A7qa7G4uPq960kzMgWjXXN6BJNNe4oYrJP7sQL/iSoMg 6xmw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=kfMjk7daXZ3/jPk6LmtxlSDZcV4VmU7NehyBsu+HAdk=; b=eYoTYVjlHR4xQop+HwfI/TGC8YGaILz8ro2Ouyi+gybRt3oNV1Hg9j26WlBofhDCJl XC89TaAAN8KcwxlMsb30fFqwrY5Zrme/bXumWyctgBGXG9AFNPHH/KEdxHnmE50TOPoH N5F8bP7jMInkeY9wChT9yEJ3jlhz8bKVejI38bHxUk3ehxn9WmwFvsum6+wwBSYivPFf 0jIx3jJYjHjNs+GccFrmyBS6uzpplAIOaS2jF4RbiXXlo+QzbGm1rK78cryj4cJSoiXj C2ceKK7mNP/c3wawTLhQgxwKnNBQbsw4xcGKcDrF0Rj6S9xWqrpJYD5GsLxkCuqVcvtn Jp9Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5322S/dHpuMpq43lbH8Cg4u9cKb+2mjdGiXVCnKi105oSL8SlaAU hSPyki4i1RdEFAIZHxqljpsnrz6UtSyLRgJ6yQIYCBXnG7E= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwlT+eF/WJ45uw9nlthwl1ohObAQyy+14mCgnrw9MVw4u+7EBTBIzNz3mDtHCv4CtmpE1XenSndBm64JDmXW+o= X-Received: by 2002:a1f:a8d4:: with SMTP id r203mr6369075vke.4.1619531820150; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 06:57:00 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210412125222.16610891@bsd64.grem.de> <20210412143852.2c856a0b@bsd64.grem.de> <20210412195740.33efe288@bsd64.grem.de> <20210412212016.4828daa4@bsd64.grem.de> In-Reply-To: <20210412212016.4828daa4@bsd64.grem.de> From: =?UTF-8?B?w5Z6a2FuIEtJUklL?= Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2021 16:56:49 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: jail - vnet bug - ping: UDP connect: No route to host To: Michael Gmelin Cc: FreeBSD Net X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FV3Gj2wQvz4Tgp X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=deHXG8qs; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of ozkankirik@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::a2c as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=ozkankirik@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::a2c:from]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com:dkim]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-net@freebsd.org]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::a2c:from:127.0.2.255]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::a2c:from]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-net] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.34 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2021 13:57:02 -0000 Hello Michael, Sorry for late reply. It works after starting ip6addrctl service. Thank you. On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 10:20 PM Michael Gmelin wrote: > > > On Mon, 12 Apr 2021 19:57:40 +0200 > Michael Gmelin wrote: > > > On Mon, 12 Apr 2021 17:45:36 +0300 > > =C3=96zkan KIRIK wrote: > > > > > root@f13:~ # jls -s -j client > > > devfs_ruleset=3D0 enforce_statfs=3D2 host=3Dnew ip4=3Dinherit ip6=3Di= nherit > > > jid=3D2 name=3Dclient osreldate=3D1300139 osrelease=3D13.0-RC5 path= =3D/ > > > persist securelevel=3D-1 sysvmsg=3Ddisable sysvsem=3Ddisable > > > sysvshm=3Ddisable vnet=3Dnew allow.nochflags allow.nomlock allow.nomo= unt > > > allow.mount.nodevfs allow.mount.noprocfs allow.mount.notmpfs > > > allow.noquotas allow.noraw_sockets allow.noread_msgbuf > > > allow.reserved_ports allow.set_hostname allow.nosocket_af > > > allow.suser allow.nosysvipc allow.unprivileged_proc_debug > > > children.max=3D0 host.domainname=3D"" host.hostid=3D0 host.hostname= =3D"" > > > host.hostuuid=3D00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000 > > > > I can reproduce the issue now, I'll try to dig deeper into it. > > > > -m > > > > [...snipsnap...] > > > > Hi =C3=96zkan, > > This is caused by ping using getaddrinfo to determine the address > family to be used. You can check this by running > > getaddrinfo www.google.com > > inside and outside of your jail and compare the results. > > Inside your jail, inet6 entries are on top, while on your host, inet > entries are on top. > > Configuration of address selection is done using /etc/rc.d/ip6addrctl, > which is enabled by default using a policy of AUTO (see > /etc/defaults/rc.conf). > > As your simple jail doesn't call any rc scripts, your missing this step. > > The easiest way to workaround the issue is to explicitly call: > > service ip6addrctl start > > after creating your vnet jail, or creating your vnet jail using: > > jail -c name=3Dclient persist vnet vnet.interface=3Dem1 \ > exec.start=3D"service ip6addrctl start" > > Best, > Michael > > -- > Michael Gmelin > From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Apr 27 15:51:25 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFA265F5C2C for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 15:51:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FV5pj4GR8z4ZKQ for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 15:51:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 926545F5AF0; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 15:51:25 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 922845F5CAC for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 15:51:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FV5pj3fhzz4ZXf for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 15:51:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 707AF1DA0D for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 15:51:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 13RFpP0Z093409 for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 15:51:25 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 13RFpPSs093408 for net@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 15:51:25 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 230996] em/igb: Intel i210/i350: ifconfig: enabling "vlanhwtag" renders VLAN on i210/i350 NICs unusable Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2021 15:51:24 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: IntelNetworking, needs-qa, performance, regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: brock@cottonwoodcomputer.com X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? mfc-stable12? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2021 15:51:25 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D230996 --- Comment #22 from Brock Williams --- I tested my case with this patch, and it doesn't seem to make an improvemen= t.=20 I'm still seeing extremely slow throughput across the interface when vlanhw= tag is enabled. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Apr 27 16:32:30 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5BBC5F6F1B for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 16:32:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FV6k63xjlz4cH0 for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 16:32:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 874295F6BFC; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 16:32:30 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8701B5F6BFB for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 16:32:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FV6k62qHsz4c32 for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 16:32:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 53F881E12A for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 16:32:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 13RGWUnf018587 for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 16:32:30 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 13RGWUVb018586 for net@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 16:32:30 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 230996] em/igb: Intel i210/i350: ifconfig: enabling "vlanhwtag" renders VLAN on i210/i350 NICs unusable Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2021 16:32:29 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: IntelNetworking, needs-qa, performance, regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: drizzt321@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? mfc-stable12? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2021 16:32:30 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D230996 --- Comment #23 from Aaron --- (In reply to Kevin Bowling from comment #21) So after much poking around, turns out there's something in FreeBSD bridges= and VLANs, where if you have a bridge on the untagged interface, it causes prob= lems with tagged traffic making it to bridges on the tagged interfaces. Once I switched to using bridges only on VLAN tagged interfaces, everything miraculously started working. Extremely annoying. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Apr 27 17:45:41 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C15F95F93CD for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 17:45:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FV8LY4ws6z4gqY for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 17:45:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id A74D45F979B; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 17:45:41 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A710C5F96A4 for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 17:45:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FV8LY48DNz4h8N for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 17:45:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 81AC51F191 for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 17:45:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 13RHjfw4052069 for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 17:45:41 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 13RHjfo9052068 for net@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 17:45:41 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 255430] ng_bridge don't sends broadcast packet to first found link in case of error in other links Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2021 17:45:41 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: dpslavov@hotmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: donner@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2021 17:45:41 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D255430 --- Comment #2 from Dancho Penev --- I don't see any change in patch semantics, it's just rephrasing so it should works. Will provide feedback when have time to test your patch. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Apr 27 22:30:50 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86ACA6245FF for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 22:30:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FVGgZ39KLz3DwN for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 22:30:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 6C9E76245FE; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 22:30:50 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C58A6245FD for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 22:30:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FVGgZ2QwPz3DlG for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 22:30:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46C3B22853 for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 22:30:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 13RMUo5W097390 for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 22:30:50 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from bugzilla@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 13RMUoDA097389 for net@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 22:30:50 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: bugzilla set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 211219] [e1000] NIC status does not pass into a state of "no carrier" after disconnecting the cable. Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2021 22:30:48 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: bin X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.3-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: IntelNetworking, patch X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: commit-hook@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2021 22:30:50 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D211219 --- Comment #38 from commit-hook@FreeBSD.org --- A commit in branch main references this bug: URL: https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/src/commit/?id=3Deea55de7b10808b86277d7fdbed2d05d3= c6db1b2 commit eea55de7b10808b86277d7fdbed2d05d3c6db1b2 Author: Kevin Bowling AuthorDate: 2021-04-25 08:22:23 +0000 Commit: Kevin Bowling CommitDate: 2021-04-27 22:29:39 +0000 e1000: Rework em_msi_link interrupt filter * Fix 82574 Link Status Changes, carrying the OTHER mask bit around as needed. * Move igb-class LSC re-arming out of FAST back into the handler. * Clarify spurious/other interrupt re-arms in FAST. In MSI-X mode, 82574 and igb-class devices use an interrupt filter to handle Link Status Changes. We want to do LSC re-arms in the handler to take advantage of autoclear (EIAC) single shot behavior. 82574 uses 'Other' in ICR and IMS for LSC interrupt types when in MSI-X mode, so we need to set and re-arm the 'Other' bit during attach and after ICR reads in the FAST handler if not an LSC or after handling on LSC due to autoclearing. This work was primarily done to address the referenced PR, but inspired some clarification and improvement for igb-class devices once the intentions of previous bug fix attempts became clearer. PR: 211219 Reported by: Alexey Tested by: kbowling (I210 lagg), markj (I210) Approved by: markj MFC after: 1 month Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D29943 sys/dev/e1000/if_em.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------- sys/dev/e1000/if_em.h | 2 -- 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Apr 27 22:42:50 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 903556247DC for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 22:42:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FVGxQ3T6Mz3FTj for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 22:42:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 7720A62490F; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 22:42:50 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76EBA624844 for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 22:42:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FVGxQ2rNLz3FTh for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 22:42:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 54DD223110 for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 22:42:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 13RMgoaJ006792 for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 22:42:50 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 13RMgojE006791 for net@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 22:42:50 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 211219] [e1000] NIC status does not pass into a state of "no carrier" after disconnecting the cable. Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2021 22:42:49 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: bin X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.3-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: IntelNetworking, patch X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: kbowling@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: kbowling@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: mfc-stable13? mfc-stable12? mfc-stable11- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: assigned_to bug_status flagtypes.name Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2021 22:42:50 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D211219 Kevin Bowling changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|net@FreeBSD.org |kbowling@freebsd.org Status|Open |In Progress Flags| |mfc-stable13?, | |mfc-stable12?, | |mfc-stable11- --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Apr 28 13:31:02 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBC6A5F3EB0 for ; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 13:31:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FVffG4yWnz4gYC for ; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 13:31:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id A79135F3A32; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 13:31:02 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6C8A5F3A31 for ; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 13:31:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FVffG3jMsz4gSn for ; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 13:31:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F83F6C93 for ; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 13:31:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 13SDV2Yk044243 for ; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 13:31:02 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 13SDV2SW044242 for net@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 13:31:02 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 230996] em/igb: Intel i210/i350: ifconfig: enabling "vlanhwtag" renders VLAN on i210/i350 NICs unusable Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2021 13:31:02 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: IntelNetworking, needs-qa, performance, regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: kaho@elam.kais.kyoto-u.ac.jp X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? mfc-stable12? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc attachments.created Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2021 13:31:02 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D230996 Kaho Toshikazu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kaho@elam.kais.kyoto-u.ac.j | |p --- Comment #24 from Kaho Toshikazu --- Created attachment 224497 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D224497&action= =3Dedit vlan patch How about this patch? 1. change initializing order. setting up vlan inside the function em_initialize_receive_unit() 2. correct calculation of receive buffer size 3. correct writing method of vfta(vlan filter table array) --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Apr 28 19:38:48 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8986F5FEFF7 for ; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 19:38:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FVppc3FBDz3Hcd for ; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 19:38:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 6F44C5FEFF4; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 19:38:48 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F0E35FEF76 for ; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 19:38:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FVppc2bypz3HkP for ; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 19:38:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4AC6013AD4 for ; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 19:38:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 13SJcmds030221 for ; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 19:38:48 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from bugzilla@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 13SJcmUB030220 for net@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 19:38:48 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: bugzilla set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 220468] libfetch: Does not handle 407 (proxy auth) when connecting to HTTPS using connect tunnel Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2021 19:38:48 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: bin X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: commit-hook@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: garga@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: mfc-stable13? mfc-stable12? mfc-stable11? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2021 19:38:48 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D220468 --- Comment #19 from commit-hook@FreeBSD.org --- A commit in branch stable/13 references this bug: URL: https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/src/commit/?id=3Dd7682961d386ebc7d5ec9cb38e609d3ec= 9bb978a commit d7682961d386ebc7d5ec9cb38e609d3ec9bb978a Author: Renato Botelho AuthorDate: 2021-04-01 21:02:57 +0000 Commit: Renato Botelho CommitDate: 2021-04-28 19:21:26 +0000 libfetch: Retry with proxy auth when server returns 407 PR: 220468 Submitted by: Egil Hasting (based on) Reviewed by: kevans, kp Approved by: kp MFC after: 2 weeks Sponsored by: Rubicon Communications, LLC ("Netgate") Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D29533 (cherry picked from commit 345c30a94f6425954163f1e0b075a75f603d27cd) lib/libfetch/http.c | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--= ---- 1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Apr 28 19:38:52 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD7105FEE73 for ; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 19:38:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FVpph4QRvz3Hmh for ; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 19:38:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 96C415FF1BA; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 19:38:52 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95BBC5FF1B9 for ; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 19:38:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FVpph3FmLz3HWh for ; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 19:38:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 603A313AD7 for ; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 19:38:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 13SJcqXw030296 for ; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 19:38:52 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from bugzilla@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 13SJcqc0030295 for net@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 19:38:52 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: bugzilla set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 220468] libfetch: Does not handle 407 (proxy auth) when connecting to HTTPS using connect tunnel Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2021 19:38:52 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: bin X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: commit-hook@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: garga@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: mfc-stable13? mfc-stable12? mfc-stable11? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2021 19:38:52 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D220468 --- Comment #20 from commit-hook@FreeBSD.org --- A commit in branch stable/12 references this bug: URL: https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/src/commit/?id=3D208c36a005f5592a9f3325036cd2e6f6e= e03ca9a commit 208c36a005f5592a9f3325036cd2e6f6ee03ca9a Author: Renato Botelho AuthorDate: 2021-04-01 21:02:57 +0000 Commit: Renato Botelho CommitDate: 2021-04-28 19:31:27 +0000 libfetch: Retry with proxy auth when server returns 407 PR: 220468 Submitted by: Egil Hasting (based on) Reviewed by: kevans, kp Approved by: kp MFC after: 2 weeks Sponsored by: Rubicon Communications, LLC ("Netgate") Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D29533 (cherry picked from commit 345c30a94f6425954163f1e0b075a75f603d27cd) lib/libfetch/http.c | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--= ---- 1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Apr 28 21:14:06 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2882D62264F for ; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 21:14:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FVrwZ0K51z3NQF for ; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 21:14:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 0AE796227DE; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 21:14:06 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AB15622776 for ; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 21:14:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FVrwY6qDFz3NKj for ; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 21:14:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DDDA0151AB for ; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 21:14:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 13SLE5wi081381 for ; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 21:14:05 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 13SLE5GY081380 for net@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 21:14:05 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 220468] libfetch: Does not handle 407 (proxy auth) when connecting to HTTPS using connect tunnel Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2021 21:14:03 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: bin X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: garga@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: garga@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: mfc-stable13+ mfc-stable12+ mfc-stable11- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: resolution flagtypes.name bug_status Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2021 21:14:06 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D220468 Renato Botelho changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |FIXED Flags|mfc-stable13?, |mfc-stable13+, |mfc-stable12?, |mfc-stable12+, |mfc-stable11? |mfc-stable11- Status|In Progress |Closed --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu Apr 29 13:11:47 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 003D2627773 for ; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 13:11:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FWG9Z6P75z4fB7 for ; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 13:11:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id D94176275E9; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 13:11:46 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D90FE627C87 for ; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 13:11:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FWG9Z5Dsqz4dx4 for ; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 13:11:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A6EA11C2B5 for ; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 13:11:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 13TDBkYO049343 for ; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 13:11:46 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 13TDBk2k049342 for net@FreeBSD.org; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 13:11:46 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 255430] ng_bridge don't sends broadcast packet to first found link in case of error in other links Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2021 13:11:46 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: dpslavov@hotmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: donner@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2021 13:11:47 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D255430 --- Comment #3 from Dancho Penev --- Made some basic testing with the new patch, no issues were observed so far. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu Apr 29 17:57:50 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4BD26321F5 for ; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 17:57:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FWNWf46NDz4tgk for ; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 17:57:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 8D08C632605; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 17:57:50 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CC97632499 for ; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 17:57:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FWNWf3VR4z4tLp for ; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 17:57:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 668FA1EE19 for ; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 17:57:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 13THvoi6091341 for ; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 17:57:50 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 13THvosN091340 for net@FreeBSD.org; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 17:57:50 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 255495] udp socket inheritance after fork+exec Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2021 17:57:50 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.2-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: eugen@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version rep_platform op_sys bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter cc Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2021 17:57:50 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D255495 Bug ID: 255495 Summary: udp socket inheritance after fork+exec Product: Base System Version: 12.2-STABLE Hardware: Any OS: Any Status: New Severity: Affects Some People Priority: --- Component: kern Assignee: net@FreeBSD.org Reporter: eugen@freebsd.org CC: mav@FreeBSD.org, melifaro@FreeBSD.org I observe the following unexpected behaviour while running both net/frr7 and net/mpd5 within same 12.2-STABLE/amd64 system. After boot, it runs just fin= e: # sockstat | fgrep frr frr staticd 37908 6 dgram -> /var/run/logpriv frr staticd 37908 10 stream -> /var/run/frr/zserv.api frr staticd 37908 11 stream /var/run/frr/staticd.vty frr ospfd 37903 6 dgram -> /var/run/logpriv frr ospfd 37903 10 stream -> /var/run/frr/zserv.api frr ospfd 37903 11 stream /var/run/frr/ospfd.vty frr zebra 37898 6 dgram -> /var/run/logpriv frr zebra 37898 18 stream /var/run/frr/zserv.api frr zebra 37898 21 stream /var/run/frr/zebra.vty frr zebra 37898 23 stream /var/run/frr/zserv.api frr zebra 37898 28 stream /var/run/frr/zserv.api # sockstat | fgrep mpd5 | fgrep udp4 root mpd5 26675 26 udp4 *:1701 *:* That is, mpd5 expects incoming L2TP connections at port udp/1701 and frr7 daemon do not use any UDP sockets, as configured. The mpd5 daemon has ip-down/ip-up scripts that may do "service frr stop" and "service frr start" in come cases, so frr7 daemons may be started as grandchildren of mpd5 process. After that, I observe this: # sockstat | fgrep frr frr staticd 40712 6 dgram -> /var/run/logpriv frr staticd 40712 12 stream -> /var/run/frr/zserv.api frr staticd 40712 13 stream /var/run/frr/staticd.vty frr staticd 40712 26 udp4 *:1701 *:* frr ospfd 40707 6 dgram -> /var/run/logpriv frr ospfd 40707 12 stream -> /var/run/frr/zserv.api frr ospfd 40707 13 stream /var/run/frr/ospfd.vty frr ospfd 40707 26 udp4 *:1701 *:* frr zebra 40702 6 dgram -> /var/run/logpriv frr zebra 40702 24 stream /var/run/frr/zserv.api frr zebra 40702 25 stream /var/run/frr/zebra.vty frr zebra 40702 26 udp4 *:1701 *:* frr zebra 40702 30 stream /var/run/frr/zserv.api frr zebra 40702 35 stream /var/run/frr/zserv.api frr daemons somehow inherit udp4/1501 socket and that is bad for local L2TP service, it is broken now. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu Apr 29 18:40:56 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 988CB633555 for ; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 18:40:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FWPTN3kjdz3C3B for ; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 18:40:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 7E7AA633599; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 18:40:56 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E41B6334CB for ; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 18:40:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FWPTN303pz4vgR for ; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 18:40:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 563DD1F056 for ; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 18:40:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 13TIeuHs012857 for ; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 18:40:56 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 13TIeuK8012856 for net@FreeBSD.org; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 18:40:56 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 255495] udp socket inheritance after fork+exec Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2021 18:40:56 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.2-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: eugen@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Resolution: Works As Intended X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2021 18:40:56 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D255495 Eugene Grosbein changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|New |Closed Resolution|--- |Works As Intended --- Comment #1 from Eugene Grosbein --- Sorry for noise, the problem is not in FreeBSD kernel but in the net/mpd5 daemon itself. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu Apr 29 19:56:27 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 069A7634EAC for ; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 19:56:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ozkan.kirik@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vs1-xe29.google.com (mail-vs1-xe29.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::e29]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FWR8T6DThz3Dl9; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 19:56:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ozkan.kirik@gmail.com) Received: by mail-vs1-xe29.google.com with SMTP id 2so34350260vsh.4; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 12:56:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=W78lQgv+01v7kQdoLehhm3IOM0xLeQgM4tJsGy37vqA=; b=LKSqf0yWFeYGIwBnfiQuNy9w+xI4A9IuOhCFN3iVJbiLKbwVwqC7fiSh7BpEW9T+06 cjrK3Ac2TFS88a6sELyFgaNJRdFJ+pyMEaQDV+qpLkGWXi+VCGNXDkGb0jtlt/NVZyI2 m5xercb/1dzFadutaWKZ6A4I3vBpoT1Bp+1KazZVq4FomNG4C1/WKTu+JG1+F15k+lY9 VTBrsZh4nCcATtaozwwyXu19xfS424TsCflQxWDi0B7AiDJxHnhPM9YaUluK/EDfRuDr 9CvjGT4iu8U/8HWw+9PQKZv/kX2XcZAHBhRfgCGdwymobfEbweqTWzQAi+Hi8kxOY53G 0thQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=W78lQgv+01v7kQdoLehhm3IOM0xLeQgM4tJsGy37vqA=; b=mYlwggBhIit24k1JLCobvJgrA4J1o1moEpyAhnqEzgvgr7HvxXo3hsxJFaZqVNKjgy 9VWmDtpJ+BGkwwrLN0ixfuU9uz41RBTNeRUEEwHubzWO7+k3FYaw+X3WqnGLvP8/7la1 YLjqHC1VhJgNCuxCE5HuoLbTyMTkkLQYB+OQswFoXRRrHnlnbvACRojGM3VWVXZlvhL7 WqRRnh5/GbfpBC1SbEO5FKqgs7cJIGE0xOZ3UEIPXORCLyxxP1FYb+8fZDIWucFflcHh gonwtIqpQ0bl+AnkcNTbGz+75ndVvBgsfRIQ9qG6VqdoaygYpXeAuJ3Ik0Vftt/uYLyU bwqQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532mxejucGoCeyUrT7g/bVntqhJUMCP5nSbePG0zYedN6TmX+tst hXkdSCicZxWRCybZZvUivFreH62QFY+BKLRjIUWFBZByFoM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJymKvsOEXdlKspWbFhacu3QgQVa1chvIgAK8zIhxWfEbRSIJE2PJCMdABCp1VHi2/wDox0JmXb5EOo98OcjSBU= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6102:389:: with SMTP id m9mr2362316vsq.33.1619726184490; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 12:56:24 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: =?UTF-8?B?w5Z6a2FuIEtJUklL?= Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2021 22:56:13 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Chelsio T62100 - t6nex0: encountered fatal error, adapter stopped. To: FreeBSD Net , Navdeep Parhar , John Baldwin X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FWR8T6DThz3Dl9 X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=LKSqf0yW; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of ozkankirik@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::e29 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=ozkankirik@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.80 / 15.00]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::e29:from]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com:dkim]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.20)[0.199]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::e29:from:127.0.2.255]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::e29:from]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-net] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.34 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2021 19:56:27 -0000 Hello, I'm using, FreeBSD stable/12-n232956-5fb6cfadcd9d-dirty: Mon Apr 12 09:03:59 +03 2021 . I'm trying to run iperf between two hosts that each one has Chelsio T62100-LP-CR card. There two host is connected with AOC cable. ifconfig output of one host is below: cc0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 options=62ec07bb ether 00:07:43:3e:5e:80 inet6 fe80::207:43ff:fe3e:5e80%cc0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0xa inet 192.168.0.70 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.0.255 groups: lanlar media: Ethernet 100GBase-SR4 status: active nd6 options=21 On the host A running : iperf -s On the host B running : iperf -c IP_OF_HOST_A -P 8 iperf version = iperf-2.1.0.r2 When I rerun iperf -c on host B, host A throws these line to dmesg: t6nex0: ! PL_PERR_CAUSE 0x19404 = 0x04000000, E 0x1fff63ff, F 0xffffffff t6nex0: ! [0x04000000] SGE t6nex0: * PL_INT_CAUSE 0x1940c = 0x04000040, E 0x1fff677d, F 0x00000000 t6nex0: * [0x04000000] SGE t6nex0: * [0x00000040] PL t6nex0: ! SGE_INT_CAUSE5 0x110c = 0x00001000, E 0x00ffffff, F 0x00ffffff t6nex0: ! PL_PL_INT_CAUSE 0x19430 = 0x00000014, E 0x00000010, F 0x00000010 t6nex0: ! [0x00000010] Fatal parity error t6nex0: ? [0x00000004] t6nex0: encountered fatal error, adapter stopped. ---------------------- I tried to run "ifconfig cc0 down; ifconfig cc0 up". and then there lines throwed to dmesg: cc0: link state changed to DOWN t6nex0: command 0x16 in mbox 4 timed out (0x4014c010). t6nex0: mbox 4 cmdsent 16a0094400000001 05dc050000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 t6nex0: mbox 4 current 16a0094400000001 05dc050000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 t6nex0: device log follows. Seq# Tstamp Level Facility Message 1949 46807821058 CRIT HW i2c transaction failed to complete 1950 46807821058 ERR PORT port_link_state_handler[0]: Something went terribly wrong. ret = -5 1951 46807941058 INFO HW hw_i2c_transaction: Address WRITE operation ndata 1 addr_op 0xa0 reg 0x56 data[0] 0x0 diff 6245, i2cm_op 0x1 failed with err -71 1952 46807941059 CRIT HW i2c transaction failed to complete 1953 46807941059 ERR PORT port_link_state_handler[0]: Something went terribly wrong. ret = -5 1954 46808061059 INFO HW hw_i2c_transaction: Address WRITE operation ndata 1 addr_op 0xa0 reg 0x56 data[0] 0x0 diff 6246, i2cm_op 0x1 failed with err -71 1955 46808061059 CRIT HW i2c transaction failed to complete 1956 46808061060 ERR PORT port_link_state_handler[0]: Something went terribly wrong. ret = -5 1957 46808181059 INFO HW hw_i2c_transaction: Address WRITE operation ndata 1 addr_op 0xa0 reg 0x56 data[0] 0x0 diff 6245, i2cm_op 0x1 failed with err -71 1958 46808181060 CRIT HW i2c transaction failed to complete 1959 46808181060 ERR PORT port_link_state_handler[0]: Something went terribly wrong. ret = -5 1960 46808301059 INFO HW hw_i2c_transaction: Address WRITE operation ndata 1 addr_op 0xa0 reg 0x56 data[0] 0x0 diff 6245, i2cm_op 0x1 failed with err -71 1961 46808301060 CRIT HW i2c transaction failed to complete 1962 46808301061 ERR PORT port_link_state_handler[0]: Something went terribly wrong. ret = -5 1963 46808421059 INFO HW hw_i2c_transaction: Address WRITE operation ndata 1 addr_op 0xa0 reg 0x56 data[0] 0x0 diff 6246, i2cm_op 0x1 failed with err -71 1964 46808421059 CRIT HW i2c transaction failed to complete 1965 46808421060 ERR PORT port_link_state_handler[0]: Something went terribly wrong. ret = -5 1966 46808514573 INFO PORT port[1] Link not up, try FEC 0x800000 1967 46808514574 INFO PORT port[1] speed update: 0x40 1968 46808524385 INFO PORT hw_mac_init_port[1], ptype 0x11, speed 0x40, lanes 0xf0, fec 0x800000 1969 46808551626 INFO HW hw_i2c_transaction: Address WRITE operation ndata 1 addr_op 0xa0 reg 0x56 data[0] 0x0 diff 16811, i2cm_op 0x1 failed with err -71 1970 46808551627 CRIT HW i2c transaction failed to complete 1971 46808551627 ERR PORT port_link_state_handler[0]: Something went terribly wrong. ret = -5 1972 46808671061 INFO HW hw_i2c_transaction: Address WRITE operation ndata 1 addr_op 0xa0 reg 0x56 data[0] 0x0 diff 6246, i2cm_op 0x1 failed with err -71 1973 46808671062 CRIT HW i2c transaction failed to complete 1974 46808671062 ERR PORT port_link_state_handler[0]: Something went terribly wrong. ret = -5 1975 46808791061 INFO HW hw_i2c_transaction: Address WRITE operation ndata 1 addr_op 0xa0 reg 0x56 data[0] 0x0 diff 6245, i2cm_op 0x1 failed with err -71 1976 46808791062 CRIT HW i2c transaction failed to complete 1977 46808791062 ERR PORT port_link_state_handler[0]: Something went terribly wrong. ret = -5 1978 46808911061 INFO HW hw_i2c_transaction: Address WRITE operation ndata 1 addr_op 0xa0 reg 0x56 data[0] 0x0 diff 6245, i2cm_op 0x1 failed with err -71 1979 46808911062 CRIT HW i2c transaction failed to complete 1980 46808911062 ERR PORT port_link_state_handler[0]: Something went terribly wrong. ret = -5 1981 46809031062 INFO HW hw_i2c_transaction: Address WRITE operation ndata 1 addr_op 0xa0 reg 0x56 data[0] 0x0 diff 6246, i2cm_op 0x1 failed with err -71 1982 46809031062 CRIT HW i2c transaction failed to complete 1983 46809031063 ERR PORT port_link_state_handler[0]: Something went terribly wrong. ret = -5 1984 46809151062 INFO HW hw_i2c_transaction: Address WRITE operation ndata 1 addr_op 0xa0 reg 0x56 data[0] 0x0 diff 6245, i2cm_op 0x1 failed with err -71 1985 46809151063 CRIT HW i2c transaction failed to complete 1986 46809151063 ERR PORT port_link_state_handler[0]: Something went terribly wrong. ret = -5 1987 46809271063 INFO HW hw_i2c_transaction: Address WRITE operation ndata 1 addr_op 0xa0 reg 0x56 data[0] 0x0 diff 6245, i2cm_op 0x1 failed with err -71 1988 46809271063 CRIT HW i2c transaction failed to complete 1989 46809271064 ERR PORT port_link_state_handler[0]: Something went terribly wrong. ret = -5 1990 46809391062 INFO HW hw_i2c_transaction: Address WRITE operation ndata 1 addr_op 0xa0 reg 0x56 data[0] 0x0 diff 6246, i2cm_op 0x1 failed with err -71 1991 46809391062 CRIT HW i2c transaction failed to complete 1992 46809391063 ERR PORT port_link_state_handler[0]: Something went terribly wrong. ret = -5 1993 46809511063 INFO HW hw_i2c_transaction: Address WRITE operation ndata 1 addr_op 0xa0 reg 0x56 data[0] 0x0 diff 6245, i2cm_op 0x1 failed with err -71 1994 46809511064 CRIT HW i2c transaction failed to complete 1995 46809511064 ERR PORT port_link_state_handler[0]: Something went terribly wrong. ret = -5 1996 46809631064 INFO HW hw_i2c_transaction: Address WRITE operation ndata 1 addr_op 0xa0 reg 0x56 data[0] 0x0 diff 6245, i2cm_op 0x1 failed with err -71 1997 46809631064 CRIT HW i2c transaction failed to complete 1998 46809631065 ERR PORT port_link_state_handler[0]: Something went terribly wrong. ret = -5 1999 46809751064 INFO HW hw_i2c_transaction: Address WRITE operation ndata 1 addr_op 0xa0 reg 0x56 data[0] 0x0 diff 6245, i2cm_op 0x1 failed with err -71 2000 46809751065 CRIT HW i2c transaction failed to complete 2001 46809751065 ERR PORT port_link_state_handler[0]: Something went terribly wrong. ret = -5 2002 46809871064 INFO HW hw_i2c_transaction: Address WRITE operation ndata 1 addr_op 0xa0 reg 0x56 data[0] 0x0 diff 6245, i2cm_op 0x1 failed with err -71 2003 46809871065 CRIT HW i2c transaction failed to complete 2004 46809871065 ERR PORT port_link_state_handler[0]: Something went terribly wrong. ret = -5 2005 46809991064 INFO HW hw_i2c_transaction: Address WRITE operation ndata 1 addr_op 0xa0 reg 0x56 data[0] 0x0 diff 6246, i2cm_op 0x1 failed with err -71 2006 46809991064 CRIT HW i2c transaction failed to complete 2007 46809991065 ERR PORT port_link_state_handler[0]: Something went terribly wrong. ret = -5 2008 46810111065 INFO HW hw_i2c_transaction: Address WRITE operation ndata 1 addr_op 0xa0 reg 0x56 data[0] 0x0 diff 6245, i2cm_op 0x1 failed with err -71 2009 46810111066 CRIT HW i2c transaction failed to complete 2010 46810111066 ERR PORT port_link_state_handler[0]: Something went terribly wrong. ret = -5 2011 46810231066 INFO HW hw_i2c_transaction: Address WRITE operation ndata 1 addr_op 0xa0 reg 0x56 data[0] 0x0 diff 6245, i2cm_op 0x1 failed with err -71 2012 46810231066 CRIT HW i2c transaction failed to complete 2013 46810231067 ERR PORT port_link_state_handler[0]: Something went terribly wrong. ret = -5 2014 46810351065 INFO HW hw_i2c_transaction: Address WRITE operation ndata 1 addr_op 0xa0 reg 0x56 data[0] 0x0 diff 6246, i2cm_op 0x1 failed with err -71 2015 46810351066 CRIT HW i2c transaction failed to complete 2016 46810351066 ERR PORT port_link_state_handler[0]: Something went terribly wrong. ret = -5 2017 46810471066 INFO HW hw_i2c_transaction: Address WRITE operation ndata 1 addr_op 0xa0 reg 0x56 data[0] 0x0 diff 6245, i2cm_op 0x1 failed with err -71 2018 46810471067 CRIT HW i2c transaction failed to complete 2019 46810471067 ERR PORT port_link_state_handler[0]: Something went terribly wrong. ret = -5 2020 46810591067 INFO HW hw_i2c_transaction: Address WRITE operation ndata 1 addr_op 0xa0 reg 0x56 data[0] 0x0 diff 6246, i2cm_op 0x1 failed with err -71 2021 46810591067 CRIT HW i2c transaction failed to complete 2022 46810591068 ERR PORT port_link_state_handler[0]: Something went terribly wrong. ret = -5 2023 46810711067 INFO HW hw_i2c_transaction: Address WRITE operation ndata 1 addr_op 0xa0 reg 0x56 data[0] 0x0 diff 6245, i2cm_op 0x1 failed with err -71 2024 46810711068 CRIT HW i2c transaction failed to complete 2025 46810711068 ERR PORT port_link_state_handler[0]: Something went terribly wrong. ret = -5 2026 46810831067 INFO HW hw_i2c_transaction: Address WRITE operation ndata 1 addr_op 0xa0 reg 0x56 data[0] 0x0 diff 6245, i2cm_op 0x1 failed with err -71 2027 46810831068 CRIT HW i2c transaction failed to complete 2028 46810831069 ERR PORT port_link_state_handler[0]: Something went terribly wrong. ret = -5 2029 46810951067 INFO HW hw_i2c_transaction: Address WRITE operation ndata 1 addr_op 0xa0 reg 0x56 data[0] 0x0 diff 6246, i2cm_op 0x1 failed with err -71 2030 46810951067 CRIT HW i2c transaction failed to complete 2031 46810951068 ERR PORT port_link_state_handler[0]: Something went terribly wrong. ret = -5 2032 46811071068 INFO HW hw_i2c_transaction: Address WRITE operation ndata 1 addr_op 0xa0 reg 0x56 data[0] 0x0 diff 6245, i2cm_op 0x1 failed with err -71 2033 46811071069 CRIT HW i2c transaction failed to complete 2034 46811071069 ERR PORT port_link_state_handler[0]: Something went terribly wrong. ret = -5 2035 46811191069 INFO HW hw_i2c_transaction: Address WRITE operation ndata 1 addr_op 0xa0 reg 0x56 data[0] 0x0 diff 6245, i2cm_op 0x1 failed with err -71 2036 46811191069 CRIT HW i2c transaction failed to complete 2037 46811191070 ERR PORT port_link_state_handler[0]: Something went terribly wrong. ret = -5 2038 46811311069 INFO HW hw_i2c_transaction: Address WRITE operation ndata 1 addr_op 0xa0 reg 0x56 data[0] 0x0 diff 6245, i2cm_op 0x1 failed with err -71 2039 46811311070 CRIT HW i2c transaction failed to complete 2040 46811311070 ERR PORT port_link_state_handler[0]: Something went terribly wrong. ret = -5 2041 46811431069 INFO HW hw_i2c_transaction: Address WRITE operation ndata 1 addr_op 0xa0 reg 0x56 data[0] 0x0 diff 6245, i2cm_op 0x1 failed with err -71 2042 46811431070 CRIT HW i2c transaction failed to complete 2043 46811431070 ERR PORT port_link_state_handler[0]: Something went terribly wrong. ret = -5 2044 46811551070 INFO HW hw_i2c_transaction: Address WRITE operation ndata 1 addr_op 0xa0 reg 0x56 data[0] 0x0 diff 6246, i2cm_op 0x1 failed with err -71 2045 46811551070 CRIT HW i2c transaction failed to complete 2046 46811551071 ERR PORT port_link_state_handler[0]: Something went terribly wrong. ret = -5 2047 46811671070 INFO HW hw_i2c_transaction: Address WRITE operation ndata 1 addr_op 0xa0 reg 0x56 data[0] 0x0 diff 6245, i2cm_op 0x1 failed with err -71 2048 46811671071 CRIT HW i2c transaction failed to complete 2049 46811671071 ERR PORT port_link_state_handler[0]: Something went terribly wrong. ret = -5 2050 46811791071 INFO HW hw_i2c_transaction: Address WRITE operation ndata 1 addr_op 0xa0 reg 0x56 data[0] 0x0 diff 6245, i2cm_op 0x1 failed with err -71 2051 46811791071 CRIT HW i2c transaction failed to complete 2052 46811791072 ERR PORT port_link_state_handler[0]: Something went terribly wrong. ret = -5 2053 46811911071 INFO HW hw_i2c_transaction: Address WRITE operation ndata 1 addr_op 0xa0 reg 0x56 data[0] 0x0 diff 6245, i2cm_op 0x1 failed with err -71 2054 46811911071 CRIT HW i2c transaction failed to complete 2055 46811911072 ERR PORT port_link_state_handler[0]: Something went terribly wrong. ret = -5 2056 46812031071 INFO HW hw_i2c_transaction: Address WRITE operation ndata 1 addr_op 0xa0 reg 0x56 data[0] 0x0 diff 6245, i2cm_op 0x1 failed with err -71 2057 46812031072 CRIT HW i2c transaction failed to complete 2058 46812031072 ERR PORT port_link_state_handler[0]: Something went terribly wrong. ret = -5 2059 46812151072 INFO HW hw_i2c_transaction: Address WRITE operation ndata 1 addr_op 0xa0 reg 0x56 data[0] 0x0 diff 6245, i2cm_op 0x1 failed with err -71 2060 46812151072 CRIT HW i2c transaction failed to complete 2061 46812151073 ERR PORT port_link_state_handler[0]: Something went terribly wrong. ret = -5 2062 46812271072 INFO HW hw_i2c_transaction: Address WRITE operation ndata 1 addr_op 0xa0 reg 0x56 data[0] 0x0 diff 6245, i2cm_op 0x1 failed with err -71 2063 46812271073 CRIT HW i2c transaction failed to complete 2064 46812271073 ERR PORT port_link_state_handler[0]: Something went terribly wrong. ret = -5 2065 46812391072 INFO HW hw_i2c_transaction: Address WRITE operation ndata 1 addr_op 0xa0 reg 0x56 data[0] 0x0 diff 6245, i2cm_op 0x1 failed with err -71 2066 46812391073 CRIT HW i2c transaction failed to complete 2067 46812391073 ERR PORT port_link_state_handler[0]: Something went terribly wrong. ret = -5 2068 46812511073 INFO HW hw_i2c_transaction: Address WRITE operation ndata 1 addr_op 0xa0 reg 0x56 data[0] 0x0 diff 6246, i2cm_op 0x1 failed with err -71 2069 46812511073 CRIT HW i2c transaction failed to complete 2070 46812511074 ERR PORT port_link_state_handler[0]: Something went terribly wrong. ret = -5 2071 46812631073 INFO HW hw_i2c_transaction: Address WRITE operation ndata 1 addr_op 0xa0 reg 0x56 data[0] 0x0 diff 6245, i2cm_op 0x1 failed with err -71 2072 46812631074 CRIT HW i2c transaction failed to complete 2073 46812631074 ERR PORT port_link_state_handler[0]: Something went terribly wrong. ret = -5 2074 46812751074 INFO HW hw_i2c_transaction: Address WRITE operation ndata 1 addr_op 0xa0 reg 0x56 data[0] 0x0 diff 6245, i2cm_op 0x1 failed with err -71 2075 46812751074 CRIT HW i2c transaction failed to complete 2076 46812751075 ERR PORT port_link_state_handler[0]: Something went terribly wrong. ret = -5 t6nex0: encountered fatal error, adapter stopped. cc0: set_rxmode (ffff) failed: 60 cc0: disable_vi failed: 60 ---------------------- And cc0 stops working, after reboot it starts work. The problem is reproducable. # pciconf -lv t6iov0@pci0:59:0:0: class=0x020000 card=0x00001425 chip=0x60071425 rev=0x00 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Chelsio Communications Inc' device = 'T62100-LP-CR Unified Wire Ethernet Controller' class = network subclass = ethernet t6iov1@pci0:59:0:1: class=0x020000 card=0x00001425 chip=0x60071425 rev=0x00 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Chelsio Communications Inc' device = 'T62100-LP-CR Unified Wire Ethernet Controller' class = network subclass = ethernet t6iov2@pci0:59:0:2: class=0x020000 card=0x00001425 chip=0x60071425 rev=0x00 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Chelsio Communications Inc' device = 'T62100-LP-CR Unified Wire Ethernet Controller' class = network subclass = ethernet t6iov3@pci0:59:0:3: class=0x020000 card=0x00001425 chip=0x60071425 rev=0x00 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Chelsio Communications Inc' device = 'T62100-LP-CR Unified Wire Ethernet Controller' class = network subclass = ethernet t6nex0@pci0:59:0:4: class=0x020000 card=0x00001425 chip=0x64071425 rev=0x00 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Chelsio Communications Inc' device = 'T62100-LP-CR Unified Wire Ethernet Controller' class = network subclass = ethernet none110@pci0:59:0:5: class=0x010000 card=0x00001425 chip=0x65071425 rev=0x00 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Chelsio Communications Inc' device = 'T62100-LP-CR Unified Wire Storage Controller' class = mass storage subclass = SCSI none111@pci0:59:0:6: class=0x0c0400 card=0x00001425 chip=0x66071425 rev=0x00 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Chelsio Communications Inc' device = 'T62100-LP-CR Unified Wire Storage Controller' class = serial bus subclass = Fibre Channel Regards Ozkan From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Apr 30 00:39:28 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 358C85E2911 for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 00:39:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FWYR40s52z3QMg for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 00:39:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 1B6605E2910; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 00:39:28 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B2935E26C5 for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 00:39:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FWYR40Bmwz3QMf for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 00:39:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE01722C4F for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 00:39:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 13U0dRt2086252 for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 00:39:27 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 13U0dRHb086251 for net@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 00:39:27 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 233817] Intel em I218-V doesn't re-initialise after wake from S3 Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2021 00:39:27 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: IntelNetworking X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: kbowling@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: resolution cc bug_status Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2021 00:39:28 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D233817 Kevin Bowling changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |FIXED CC| |kbowling@freebsd.org Status|New |Closed --- Comment #2 from Kevin Bowling --- This is fixed per the reporter above. Verified on current as well with chipsets I have available. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Apr 30 01:37:34 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA0B45E3DA4 for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 01:37:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FWZk661rmz3j71 for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 01:37:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id CCC065E3F81; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 01:37:34 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB6325E3F09 for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 01:37:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FWZk65Bg8z3j9L for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 01:37:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A5833235F3 for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 01:37:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 13U1bYsT012929 for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 01:37:34 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 13U1bYXo012928 for net@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 01:37:34 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 251267] iflib/em Intel I217-LM NIC : sporadic connection loss with 12-STABLE Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2021 01:37:34 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: Unspecified X-Bugzilla-Keywords: IntelNetworking X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: kbowling@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2021 01:37:35 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D251267 Kevin Bowling changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kbowling@freebsd.org --- Comment #1 from Kevin Bowling --- (In reply to O. Hartmann from comment #0) Can you give me a dump of sysctl dev.em.0 during functional and non-functio= nal states? I'll take a look at this. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Apr 30 03:37:57 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDFA95E5DEA for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 03:37:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FWdP14f6Kz3n1n for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 03:37:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 9C9235E6308; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 03:37:57 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C27F5E5FD0 for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 03:37:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FWdP12f62z3nN8 for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 03:37:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF4FA250E2 for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 03:37:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 13U3bupx074338 for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 03:37:56 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 13U3bun0074337 for net@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 03:37:56 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 255495] udp socket inheritance after fork+exec Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2021 03:37:56 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.2-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: koobs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Resolution: Not A Bug X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: eugen@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: assigned_to resolution Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2021 03:37:58 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D255495 Kubilay Kocak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|net@FreeBSD.org |eugen@freebsd.org Resolution|Works As Intended |Not A Bug --- Comment #2 from Kubilay Kocak --- ^Triage: Assign to committer that resolved. Correct resolution --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Apr 30 03:40:59 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 046C95E6341 for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 03:40:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FWdSV4GL5z3nQv for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 03:40:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 905685E64AA; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 03:40:58 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9009B5E63A4 for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 03:40:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FWdSV2dZDz3nTM for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 03:40:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DDED253A0 for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 03:40:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 13U3ewbI074874 for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 03:40:58 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 13U3ew6X074873 for net@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 03:40:58 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 233817] Intel em I218-V doesn't re-initialise after wake from S3 Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2021 03:40:58 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: IntelNetworking X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: koobs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: kbowling@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: assigned_to dependson Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2021 03:40:59 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D233817 Kubilay Kocak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|net@FreeBSD.org |kbowling@freebsd.org Depends on| |224059 --- Comment #3 from Kubilay Kocak --- ^Triage:=20 - Assign to committer that resolved - Depend On the resolving issue (Note: Not dupe'ing given no report of LOR/deadlock here. Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D224059 [Bug 224059] LOR or deadlock in em0 when resuming from suspend --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Apr 30 04:28:44 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE5A55E7524 for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 04:28:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FWfWc3VS6z3qJG for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 04:28:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 763825E713B; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 04:28:44 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 760015E7523 for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 04:28:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FWfWc2StZz3pwn for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 04:28:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 484ED25C40 for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 04:28:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 13U4Sip0000242 for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 04:28:44 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 13U4Siob000241 for net@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 04:28:44 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 230996] em/igb: Intel i210/i350: ifconfig: enabling "vlanhwtag" renders VLAN on i210/i350 NICs unusable Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2021 04:28:42 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: IntelNetworking, needs-qa, performance, regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: kbowling@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? mfc-stable12? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2021 04:28:44 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D230996 --- Comment #25 from Kevin Bowling --- I've incorporated Kaho Toshikazu's fixes in https://reviews.freebsd.org/D30= 002 if anyone can retest. It does sound like there is special interaction with if_bridge I need to ch= ase down, but I would appreciate any feedback on the above patch as it should be ready to go barring any further review feedback. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Apr 30 04:57:53 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F93F5E7E13 for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 04:57:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peter@rulingia.com) Received: from vtr.rulingia.com (vtr.rulingia.com [IPv6:2001:19f0:5801:ebe:5400:1ff:fe53:30fd]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA512 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "vtr.rulingia.com", Issuer "R3" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FWg9C2kvgz3rMp for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 04:57:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peter@rulingia.com) Received: from server.rulingia.com (ppp239-208.static.internode.on.net [59.167.239.208]) by vtr.rulingia.com (8.16.1/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 13U4vahJ079618 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=AEAD-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 14:57:41 +1000 (AEST) (envelope-from peter@rulingia.com) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 vtr.rulingia.com 13U4vahJ079618 X-Bogosity: Ham, spamicity=0.000000 Received: from server.rulingia.com (localhost.rulingia.com [127.0.0.1]) by server.rulingia.com (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPS id 13U4vTrv018666 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=AEAD-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 14:57:30 +1000 (AEST) (envelope-from peter@server.rulingia.com) Received: (from peter@localhost) by server.rulingia.com (8.16.1/8.16.1/Submit) id 13U4vTZP018665 for freebsd-net@freebsd.org; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 14:57:29 +1000 (AEST) (envelope-from peter) Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2021 14:57:29 +1000 From: Peter Jeremy To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: "panic: Assertion in_epoch(net_epoch_preempt) failed" in recent 12-stable Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="jujNPYbV46fWLy3l" Content-Disposition: inline X-PGP-Key: http://www.rulingia.com/keys/peter.pgp X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FWg9C2kvgz3rMp X-Spamd-Bar: ------ X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-6.10 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[rulingia.com:s=default]; FREEFALL_USER(0.00)[peter]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; MIME_GOOD(-0.20)[multipart/signed,text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-net@freebsd.org]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[2001:19f0:5801:ebe:5400:1ff:fe53:30fd:from:127.0.2.255]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[rulingia.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[rulingia.com,quarantine]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; SIGNED_PGP(-2.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[2001:19f0:5801:ebe:5400:1ff:fe53:30fd:from]; ASN(0.00)[asn:20473, ipnet:2001:19f0:5800::/38, country:US]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-net] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2021 04:57:53 -0000 --jujNPYbV46fWLy3l Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I've had the following panic & traceback occur twice with different recent 12-stable kernels. I hadn't see that before I updated from r366967 to a mid-April 12-stable. Doing some searching turns up some older similar issues but they should all be fixed well before r366967. Looking though commits since then doesn't turn up anything suspicious. I don't believe there's anything particularly unusual about this system: All the network traffic (and there shouldn't have been much) would be going via one active em(4) NIC. That NIC has one VLAN associated with it (though there'd be no traffic on it). There are also inactive tap and tun NICs and a second, inactive em NIC. Has anyone seen anything like this or have any ideas? panic: Assertion in_epoch(net_epoch_preempt) failed at /usr/src/sys/net/if.= c:2228 KDB: stack backtrace: db_trace_self_wrapper() at db_trace_self_wrapper+0x2b/frame 0xfffffe020aaf0= 600 vpanic() at vpanic+0x17b/frame 0xfffffe020aaf0650 panic() at panic+0x43/frame 0xfffffe020aaf06b0 ifaof_ifpforaddr() at ifaof_ifpforaddr+0x142/frame 0xfffffe020aaf06f0 ip_redir_alloc() at ip_redir_alloc+0x1f6/frame 0xfffffe020aaf0780 ip_tryforward() at ip_tryforward+0x3e4/frame 0xfffffe020aaf0800 ip_input() at ip_input+0x4a0/frame 0xfffffe020aaf08b0 netisr_dispatch_src() at netisr_dispatch_src+0x9b/frame 0xfffffe020aaf0910 ether_demux() at ether_demux+0x156/frame 0xfffffe020aaf0940 ether_nh_input() at ether_nh_input+0x3f3/frame 0xfffffe020aaf09a0 netisr_dispatch_src() at netisr_dispatch_src+0x9b/frame 0xfffffe020aaf0a00 ether_input() at ether_input+0x86/frame 0xfffffe020aaf0a30 _task_fn_rx() at _task_fn_rx+0xc4a/frame 0xfffffe020aaf0b20 gtaskqueue_run_locked() at gtaskqueue_run_locked+0x135/frame 0xfffffe020aaf= 0b80 gtaskqueue_thread_loop() at gtaskqueue_thread_loop+0x94/frame 0xfffffe020aa= f0bb0 fork_exit() at fork_exit+0x80/frame 0xfffffe020aaf0bf0 fork_trampoline() at fork_trampoline+0xe/frame 0xfffffe020aaf0bf0 --- trap 0, rip =3D 0, rsp =3D 0, rbp =3D 0 --- --=20 Peter Jeremy --jujNPYbV46fWLy3l Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQKTBAEBCgB9FiEE7rKYbDBnHnTmXCJ+FqWXoOSiCzQFAmCLjjNfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldEVF QjI5ODZDMzA2NzFFNzRFNjVDMjI3RTE2QTU5N0EwRTRBMjBCMzQACgkQFqWXoOSi CzTRCBAAlvxEdzpUThyIvzZOxXfKWKW/ajoVvE/t+ZNcZ6PXbPWs4cW3O2dhgs0e zRnunEsTc2NDh519JSor5ANc/WO7A7ejEZh88OmhuO2m6T+8dPtB6lqVVzS7Pk9P f78FiLPBPY/IwOHRH+yodYaZlGI5TlkzxVQ59Mqr1HszPsbKFbNRPK4pRutjrikV b2ybd/8GzOjhkd1FQ3pNPhdVqo1fjFGgM0HlKoaHe2s88tyqfJJ94tVgRlVgl4ei CU2G9BBiK5gNdRkya8uWW/ioiHPLVfx32llhfXw0dcIdx27PP6MEE592eYVIPVxC exOT9SeAbzBRu0G38COdJRVwGddnBVvCdtpfv5/gwB8Ynw33IbXQ8oGnB3w3gGWZ rzW4Ne9gXMgnu9C5u0WosMpcLsQv5CvEPv8CkF9FvL/2zfLLoyoqSRgR6OcmRFDO Xost4bjmsH5g8LF25/f5kokQRoHPd7sasuGKfY+6PIyPsDq+GcI9JMVwn8LOuW9d l3HD+aLqZLj/u1iQrNVTHpBWtroD1+aUAMnUITC8AROBoY5l+89YyQ+7owQ4ek8+ cmTlhOPFo4lqk0QBPFT0yO7pgEEvjBoSPmF/s0O6j1HRNFGLqv31nWPW4fQscLpW ANs4Gsrfl/JQ5KmjSWoAqEUHq8b5+8IhYTGx4prarjy1hCxrNXc= =mqsj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --jujNPYbV46fWLy3l-- From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Apr 30 09:09:00 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DC2C5F7461 for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 09:09:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FWml01bCGz4XlZ for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 09:09:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 367325F7460; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 09:09:00 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 352995F7705 for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 09:09:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FWml0101pz4XjR for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 09:09:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 12F2B299A7 for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 09:09:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 13U990xQ042944 for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 09:09:00 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 13U990qR042943 for net@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 09:09:00 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 255507] traceroute6 generates wrong UDP checksum Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2021 09:08:59 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: bin X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: linimon@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: assigned_to Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2021 09:09:00 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D255507 Mark Linimon changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|bugs@FreeBSD.org |net@FreeBSD.org --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Apr 30 09:18:50 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 077925F7C52 for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 09:18:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FWmyK6d7yz4YP4 for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 09:18:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id E362D5F7B4E; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 09:18:49 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E32975F7B4D for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 09:18:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FWmyK5yRMz4YJs for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 09:18:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA88929AC0 for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 09:18:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 13U9InN7047344 for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 09:18:49 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 13U9InW7047343 for net@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 09:18:49 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 255507] traceroute6 generates wrong UDP checksum Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2021 09:18:49 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: bin X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: zlei.huang@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: see_also Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2021 09:18:50 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D255507 Zhenlei Huang changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- See Also| |https://reviews.freebsd.org | |/D30042 --- Comment #1 from Zhenlei Huang --- I can confirm the regression was introduced in review D25604 . Proposed patch https://reviews.freebsd.org/D30042 --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Apr 30 09:20:03 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BDB45F7E41 for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 09:20:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FWmzl3rNMz4Y3K for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 09:20:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 83E7C5F7E40; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 09:20:03 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83B0E5F8083 for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 09:20:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FWmzl3Fjmz4YRk for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 09:20:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 62C1129AC1 for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 09:20:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 13U9K3iX047616 for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 09:20:03 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 13U9K36F047615 for net@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 09:20:03 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 255507] traceroute6 generates wrong UDP checksum Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2021 09:20:03 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: bin X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: zlei.huang@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: see_also bug_file_loc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2021 09:20:03 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D255507 Zhenlei Huang changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- See Also|https://reviews.freebsd.org |https://reviews.freebsd.org |/D30042 |/D25604 URL| |https://reviews.freebsd.org | |/D30042 --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Apr 30 14:40:57 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0F3D62121F for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 14:40:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FWw616HbVz4pBW for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 14:40:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id D629062121E; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 14:40:57 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5F2562121D for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 14:40:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FWw615bpVz4pPd for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 14:40:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B2C1F2D7EC for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 14:40:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 13UEevxr011978 for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 14:40:57 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 13UEev1I011977 for net@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 14:40:57 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 230996] em/igb: Intel i210/i350: ifconfig: enabling "vlanhwtag" renders VLAN on i210/i350 NICs unusable Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2021 14:40:56 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: IntelNetworking, needs-qa, performance, regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: kaho@elam.kais.kyoto-u.ac.jp X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? mfc-stable12? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2021 14:40:58 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D230996 --- Comment #26 from Kaho Toshikazu --- (In reply to Kevin Bowling from comment #25) I don't test review D30002, but I think it contains some inappropriate parts relating in "1. Call down to the hw support routine on vlan register and unregister events".=20 I think that "call hw support" would not be solve the problem but make other trouble. I think vlan register/unregister parts in current c= odes=20 are not broken. I think that using E1000_WRITE_REG_ARRAY directly is a obvious bug which was introduced at iflib conversion.=20 The driver stores a device specific function for writing vfta into the e1000_write_vfta variable, and should use this variable as a function of writing vfta. At first, correcting only this area is a good course, I think. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Apr 30 15:24:30 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B71E762216E for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 15:24:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FWx4G4cVQz4rHK for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 15:24:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 9C6FF62268C; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 15:24:30 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C3C3622371 for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 15:24:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FWx4G3nZPz4rZn for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 15:24:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 717642E72A for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 15:24:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 13UFOUah032652 for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 15:24:30 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 13UFOU2E032650 for net@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 15:24:30 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 230996] em/igb: Intel i210/i350: ifconfig: enabling "vlanhwtag" renders VLAN on i210/i350 NICs unusable Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2021 15:24:29 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: IntelNetworking, needs-qa, performance, regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: brock@cottonwoodcomputer.com X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? mfc-stable12? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2021 15:24:30 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D230996 --- Comment #27 from Brock Williams --- I tested D30002 this morning, and in my case it didn't improve anything but didn't seem to break anything obvious either. Still poor throughput across= the VLAN with hwtag enabled. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Apr 30 16:16:43 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 544B66237FC for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 16:16:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FWyDW1mmGz4tD5 for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 16:16:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 3ACF16238AE; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 16:16:43 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A9A36237FB for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 16:16:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FWyDW14bRz4tcm for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 16:16:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 184F12F222 for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 16:16:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 13UGGhVC061783 for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 16:16:43 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 13UGGhbE061782 for net@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 16:16:43 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 255430] ng_bridge don't sends broadcast packet to first found link in case of error in other links Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2021 16:16:42 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: donner@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: donner@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2021 16:16:43 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D255430 --- Comment #4 from Lutz Donnerhacke --- I'll wait for reviews from others before commiting it. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Apr 30 20:12:02 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48F84627F56 for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 20:12:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ozkan.kirik@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vs1-xe2a.google.com (mail-vs1-xe2a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::e2a]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FX3S10zblz3LgW for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 20:12:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ozkan.kirik@gmail.com) Received: by mail-vs1-xe2a.google.com with SMTP id a24so1036406vso.4 for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 13:12:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=eh0yK+jCopyxWQvnt/FcK2X6qsULDOk+IfKpPZLFdFw=; b=TS4RBYd9LDjdcMYvnSyteEr+0CXEBqfhtncKFT3s/Me306BULl+1hUNqKO5CT9yat0 rTjFvXkbkd1axrtwSIgrHnVVzWoge8lN+l0bB+Prr4MvBXs04yfCkYm9O26ahcL1bgqG WqlXro0IXhEZEDZZ9sprOImcJ7w9sDzpE1glvrLB6XHhXZFe2hdaZUM5YPo6WVY01Zbb 7D1oNdIvxxJUZhmojNH4GSCxvf448JqYmz1wyTl7RGNO+UYYG7wdaEVwj6BU6X/0R4FZ zeUyBPIXFwp6IVmsAHK34SjfCRQUrM0cXxvh2BI0+cvCmeTwkxfU1FEnPyewEE5nUAGX 4FqA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=eh0yK+jCopyxWQvnt/FcK2X6qsULDOk+IfKpPZLFdFw=; b=VnSiXjzhGWCbZp8WUeX9VvsfBxiGchxXmhpHLyCWo7srxXBDgo9bz7RmcGHLOlYvzw wSudDvTzMVEDFjX/IVou6iJGXUM+xXD4Gch499k1Jj/qw8YIsRL0GcLivXELkqXlbTYa +dDWOm3eqNF4fpsV0J/7r8PokUIui90QEskk31noActznVclu/xVOlRTJDys+NYoeQqn QkZx/d3hpwt3MPaZkz+vbRtRjESR87h6m4ssHm29IHYTszJyKubRaK/yF7VVy6ZKAFPL kKx1SXTaPfGoA3wfpcYkAUHSktFP2112HufzDPq/hJPwRqdXjzoWTwR/V4SezpYHfe2o 1wYA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531ZSRG1QlqSygkCCy3mTNbF1EUOu2oU+08vCWi0WExY8WQAiGxy JrZRUy4MkL+V8eO0sVP3EZL1Cd/+Tr6+SCJK0hK/Vut11hCXCQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxnQ2S3ww/CxKLZTyD7Eh0DqLoN7RRsLzKSJOLdm5R90Kq24SRPMANgBNtABtlIATgk9R6Eht92q1P68p/wt28= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6102:389:: with SMTP id m9mr8666952vsq.33.1619813518676; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 13:11:58 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: =?UTF-8?B?w5Z6a2FuIEtJUklL?= Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2021 23:11:48 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: IPsec performace - netisr hits %100 To: FreeBSD Net X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FX3S10zblz3LgW X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=TS4RBYd9; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of ozkankirik@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::e2a as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=ozkankirik@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.29 / 15.00]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; R_MIXED_CHARSET(0.71)[subject]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com:dkim]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::e2a:from]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-net@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::e2a:from:127.0.2.255]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::e2a:from]; HTTP_TO_IP(1.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-net] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.34 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2021 20:12:02 -0000 Hello, I'm using FreeBSD stable/12 built world on 12 April 2021. my setup is: [freebsd host cc0] <--------> [cc1 - same freebsd, but jail] without IPsec, I can achieve easily to 20Gbps. (test was run with different source IPs using multiple iperf to scale across multiple queues) My hardware is Xeon D-2146NT (8 core + SoC Qat), cc0 and cc1 is Chelsio T62100-LP-CR. But with IPsec, throughput is limited to 2Gbps (with ccr) and only one netisr thread hits %100 cpu. with aesni throughput is 1,4 Gbps with QAT throughput is 1,6 Gbps (qat0 C62x, qat1 C62x) with CCR throughput is 2,0 Gbps (t6nex0) But always bottleneck is netisr. Is there any way to workaround this netisr bottleneck ? I tried to switch net.isr.dispatch to deferred and hybrid, but performance drops a bit. my configuration is below: net.isr.numthreads: 4 net.isr.maxprot: 16 net.isr.defaultqlimit: 8192 net.isr.maxqlimit: 1000000 net.isr.bindthreads: 1 net.isr.maxthreads: 4 net.isr.dispatch: direct net.inet.ipsec.async_crypto: 1 FreeBSD Host: kldload ccr # Chelsio Crypto Accelerator ifconfig lo1 create 172.16.68.1/24 up ifconfig cc0 192.168.1.3/24 up ifconfig ipsec0 create reqid 100 ifconfig ipsec0 inet tunnel 192.168.1.3 192.168.1.5 ifconfig ipsec0 inet 172.16.0.3/16 172.16.0.5 setkey -c << EOF add 192.168.1.3 192.168.1.5 esp 10000 -m tunnel -u 100 -E aes-gcm-16 "VerySecureKey!!10000"; add 192.168.1.5 192.168.1.3 esp 10001 -m tunnel -u 100 -E aes-gcm-16 "VerySecureKey!!20000"; EOF route add 172.16.70.0/24 172.16.0.5 iperf -s FreeBSD Jail: jail -c name=3Dclient persist vnet vnet.interface=3Dcc1 host.hostname=3Dcli= ent jexec client sysctl net.inet.ipsec.async_crypto=3D1 jexec client ifconfig lo1 create 172.16.70.1/24 up jexec client bash -c 'for i in $(seq 2 10); do ifconfig lo1 172.16.70.$i/32 alias; done' jexec client ifconfig cc1 192.168.1.5/24 up jexec client ifconfig ipsec0 create reqid 200 jexec client ifconfig ipsec0 inet tunnel 192.168.1.5 192.168.1.3 jexec client ifconfig ipsec0 inet 172.16.0.5/16 172.16.0.3 jexec client setkey -c add 192.168.1.3 192.168.1.5 esp 10000 -m tunnel -u 200 -E aes-gcm-16 "VerySecureKey!!10000"; add 192.168.1.5 192.168.1.3 esp 10001 -m tunnel -u 200 -E aes-gcm-16 "VerySecureKey!!20000"; ^D jexec client route add 172.16.68.0/24 172.16.0.3 jexec client bash -c 'for i in $(seq 1 10); do (iperf -B 172.16.70.$i -c 172.16.68.1 -P 2 | grep SUM &); done' --------------------------------- top -azSHj PID JID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND 11 0 root -72 - 0B 1120K CPU2 2 0:26 100.00% [intr{swi1: netisr 2}] 11 0 root -92 - 0B 1120K CPU4 4 0:36 72.55% [intr{irq295: t6nex0:0a0}] 3 0 root -16 - 0B 16K CPU8 8 0:13 51.11% [crypto returns 0] 11 0 root -92 - 0B 1120K WAIT 11 0:18 43.40% [intr{irq297: t6nex0:0a2}] 14 0 root -16 - 0B 16K crypto 14 0:09 33.43% [crypto returns 8] 11 0 root -92 - 0B 1120K WAIT 12 0:11 21.17% [intr{irq307: t6nex0:1a2}] 9049 1 root 32 0 23M 4356K CPU14 14 0:00 7.50% iperf -B 172.16.70.9 -c 172.16.68.1 -P 2{iperf} 9040 1 root 30 0 23M 4356K sbwait 8 0:00 6.92% iperf -B 172.16.70.6 -c 172.16.68.1 -P 2{iperf} 9043 1 root 33 0 23M 4356K sbwait 8 0:00 6.90% iperf -B 172.16.70.7 -c 172.16.68.1 -P 2{iperf} 9046 1 root 32 0 23M 4356K sbwait 11 0:00 6.72% iperf -B 172.16.70.8 -c 172.16.68.1 -P 2{iperf} 9031 1 root 24 0 23M 4356K sbwait 6 0:00 6.40% iperf -B 172.16.70.3 -c 172.16.68.1 -P 2{iperf} 9037 1 root 29 0 23M 4356K sbwait 11 0:00 6.05% iperf -B 172.16.70.5 -c 172.16.68.1 -P 2{iperf} 9037 1 root 29 0 23M 4356K sbwait 6 0:00 5.82% iperf -B 172.16.70.5 -c 172.16.68.1 -P 2{iperf} 9025 1 root 22 0 23M 4356K sbwait 14 0:00 5.71% iperf -B 172.16.70.1 -c 172.16.68.1 -P 2{iperf} 9052 1 root 32 0 23M 4356K sbwait 10 0:00 5.24% iperf -B 172.16.70.10 -c 172.16.68.1 -P 2{iperf} If you need more information, i can provide. Regards, =C3=96zkan From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Apr 30 20:32:54 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FA44628CCF for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 20:32:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from markjdb@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qk1-x730.google.com (mail-qk1-x730.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::730]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FX3w53hdzz3Mll for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 20:32:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from markjdb@gmail.com) Received: by mail-qk1-x730.google.com with SMTP id q136so51115003qka.7 for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 13:32:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to; bh=HraNHC/MLd5+1hxz3m+65lN6QwntfA3z5a9lRBe1Rls=; b=MifqGZC6/U1jGKrGFyEv1ZaZWS5S+tK0G0K4UIx1UlFyPTiBug7JE9h2zJYHMvd3jN q2Zj1kYGnp5epcOiIv0z10iS3HZ9t1kwAI807UOonfcdvOlaEmbK3VOdArW+Y19E9PYa L0PuFuOzAlVN+cuL44BdwuyyzaKVkhKpsFFFKh6hM+60Gf69lxEfrNvyHf+DhMtw5Qk7 RY/5kKTVT22pLqmBrCL4dqUaZLLjhfTKiUDlfjppmnpKS1FOm4m1FZV+EU7VE9QkpFlb AfBNr9WyyAUloTpYM6/brulk+xa08V9/SXh5mCimsNnid/s/ta8JkiP9IYP6Vsf1ydf4 25gQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-disposition :content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to; bh=HraNHC/MLd5+1hxz3m+65lN6QwntfA3z5a9lRBe1Rls=; b=thQRAJFFmfaevm5/KfHGbUs4w42Hik1I6JJyEpuQzXGJILg1k+PZwgnfoq33pW+FVW VesxQCLYmGoZdHKx/5VGDp7EqxKjHasFS5TmnOsqqAUXSzzFUQLRv4ENJKC1Lm4lOYR6 pcMHGJhJlNwTXw0Uv+2SmdK81/j8EgwqmFL1S5dO38MtaYWbgcOu0BBBdf42ZQbX54VA WUC4C+L2w+XfuLEFZZJ7tLDV8CUBUOmSNzIZwGfXWHpJoU1ugu1ouY9/vw7Fftq/XwTs pg7FYRfYL97dw7ulOcy3EeocGrek47bxlhk01DFP2l/NMrHSRcB3Gzf/DaDtnslODhO5 GZzA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532QqVO9QH23eKvtBFADIwoeAoGa88GKljMdumQCObvGf445A5Df Dd0TWC6OGz75BoQUXEeLHXI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzNebc85nV/n4HKwe40fhOT9wujNNu8//l3zSulr79WaMnxeZ7p/81HjzdnU845PvLJlJDw9A== X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:ece:: with SMTP id x14mr7657408qkm.98.1619814772167; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 13:32:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nuc ([142.126.164.150]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 191sm2348875qkk.31.2021.04.30.13.32.51 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 30 Apr 2021 13:32:51 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Mark Johnston Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2021 16:32:52 -0400 From: Mark Johnston To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?=D6zkan?= KIRIK Cc: FreeBSD Net Subject: Re: IPsec performace - netisr hits %100 Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FX3w53hdzz3Mll X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=MifqGZC6; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of markjdb@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::730 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=markjdb@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.70 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36:c]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[gmail.com]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[markj@freebsd.org,markjdb@gmail.com]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[markj@freebsd.org,markjdb@gmail.com]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::730:from]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-net@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[freebsd.org]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::730:from:127.0.2.255]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::730:from]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-net] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2021 20:32:54 -0000 On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 11:11:48PM +0300, Özkan KIRIK wrote: > Hello, > > I'm using FreeBSD stable/12 built world on 12 April 2021. > my setup is: > [freebsd host cc0] <--------> [cc1 - same freebsd, but jail] > > without IPsec, I can achieve easily to 20Gbps. (test was run with different > source IPs using multiple iperf to scale across multiple queues) > My hardware is Xeon D-2146NT (8 core + SoC Qat), cc0 and cc1 is Chelsio > T62100-LP-CR. > > But with IPsec, throughput is limited to 2Gbps (with ccr) and only one > netisr thread hits %100 cpu. > with aesni throughput is 1,4 Gbps > with QAT throughput is 1,6 Gbps (qat0 C62x, qat1 C62x) > with CCR throughput is 2,0 Gbps (t6nex0) > But always bottleneck is netisr. > > Is there any way to workaround this netisr bottleneck ? > I tried to switch net.isr.dispatch to deferred and hybrid, but performance > drops a bit. I can suggest a couple of things to try. First, we configure only one netisr thread by default. You can create more by setting the net.isr.maxthreads loader tunable. I believe netipsec selects a thread using the SPI so adding more threads might not help much depending on your configuration, but testing with e.g., maxthreads = ncpu could be illuminating. Second, netipsec unconditionally hands rx processing off to netisr threads for some reason, that's why changing the dispatch policy doesn't help. Maybe it's to help avoid running out of kernel stack space or to somehow avoid packet reordering in some case that is not clear to me. I tried a patch (see below) which eliminates this and it helped somewhat. If anyone can provide an explanation for the current behaviour I'd appreciate it. Could you try both approaches and report back? It would also be interesting to know how your results compare with 13.0, if possible. commit 618ab87449d412a74bfee4932d84a6fc17afce6c Author: Mark Johnston Date: Thu Jan 7 11:29:14 2021 -0500 netipsec: Avoid deferred dispatch on the input path diff --git a/sys/netipsec/ipsec_input.c b/sys/netipsec/ipsec_input.c index 48acba68a1fe..98d0954c4c53 100644 --- a/sys/netipsec/ipsec_input.c +++ b/sys/netipsec/ipsec_input.c @@ -425,7 +425,7 @@ ipsec4_common_input_cb(struct mbuf *m, struct secasvar *sav, int skip, error = ipsec_if_input(m, sav, af); if (error == 0) { NET_EPOCH_ENTER(et); - error = netisr_queue_src(isr_prot, (uintptr_t)sav->spi, m); + error = netisr_dispatch_src(isr_prot, (uintptr_t)sav->spi, m); NET_EPOCH_EXIT(et); if (error) { IPSEC_ISTAT(sproto, qfull); @@ -624,7 +624,7 @@ ipsec6_common_input_cb(struct mbuf *m, struct secasvar *sav, int skip, error = ipsec_if_input(m, sav, af); if (error == 0) { NET_EPOCH_ENTER(et); - error = netisr_queue_src(isr_prot, + error = netisr_dispatch_src(isr_prot, (uintptr_t)sav->spi, m); NET_EPOCH_EXIT(et); if (error) { From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Apr 30 20:40:56 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 771026291AE for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 20:40:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ozkan.kirik@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vs1-xe32.google.com (mail-vs1-xe32.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::e32]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FX45M5342z3NQT; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 20:40:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ozkan.kirik@gmail.com) Received: by mail-vs1-xe32.google.com with SMTP id k124so36321823vsk.3; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 13:40:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=QRl+ComvP9OiGS/DWtC+lBRljyKUB1YRVFOuYN1maSk=; b=acxU6to/A6Z4sXe7LfQk8iLQ1O3FakDTQ0zA1+gdW85FZvEl5IwaxEoM63T9XATXqX fiNcSlXCI3sWxPrfeAk0MFjJ4EPFpqPyDoAW2nB2p2mP8PaV7t53iDYtNquIrYGFhF02 Qhps1XZ+pTn0swWkp7IvE5fw/lSjX3M0KSaSxfTN4DFp+cf6dzt+16ksVhpeJBoXNahg dSljtUZZWMl5D2lHxzt6zCUDO5y72T6IiNHr7l5tKlmXcROW/L8T3Cwp1dgd0alFRYFF xXNf75OYbTYT2Bd30fuedrRpofyAWKFscXPaQZRE2uwe5sd9bv8r5pebKiFyR6/r5NRx /zgA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=QRl+ComvP9OiGS/DWtC+lBRljyKUB1YRVFOuYN1maSk=; b=XZ5bfXWWyJYhD5mz60IomTJyg3qaYOnwwekO+h3uxpjt9BGJBih8/MMraQgvDa7+Ri dr4jE1XzIkAfv8QDJmSej6sUUiCfKJABCPPK1uLmXAk0XKhiOOSYi+j1SorFthM1aXV5 dFwR/MKsgS6nyM3DDvvW5NstKSyYCGWQ5QbhwEF5ds9FKF5c1Nqye7U10Y+muVdSKbOz 9Jy4i63ns8y0ZqoWavNVvlHQAKqd+SpLH1lii26vo5olAwy0+QE4Og1WunhgD+QHPSTC ZQ7evMCJLL6XWtLFvNeGf5+iyZabQzxZTmis6z0MdMGee4Fmew5+UYF6a+xwIVFH/1F2 PL2w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532m3x0uezRXyU8IF9PqLQJhRhjY7s29b0LqMIEqWUYwJb3KeoTA zk3iEfwDXbm2MM0+kiGacenl3cv1JLMUa3ZilM8puTjSixs= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz9wbKYW1fCwrqF4E0Qe1eRdIfrrv+vWDqkHVyu7ZlW/R857QbHu6Iu0gy1wcToAvIipvVOS5JKvTl4eHLTchY= X-Received: by 2002:a67:f693:: with SMTP id n19mr8496674vso.55.1619815254147; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 13:40:54 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: =?UTF-8?B?w5Z6a2FuIEtJUklL?= Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2021 23:40:43 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: IPsec performace - netisr hits %100 To: Mark Johnston Cc: FreeBSD Net X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FX45M5342z3NQT X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=acxU6to/; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of ozkankirik@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::e32 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=ozkankirik@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.38 / 15.00]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36:c]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; R_MIXED_CHARSET(0.62)[subject]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com:dkim]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::e32:from]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::e32:from:127.0.2.255]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::e32:from]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-net] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.34 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2021 20:40:56 -0000 Thank you Mark, I'm going to recompile kernel with this patch and share results. After a few days, I can install stable/13 on same hardware and then I'll repeat same tests. Thanks again, Cheers On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 11:32 PM Mark Johnston wrote: > On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 11:11:48PM +0300, =C3=96zkan KIRIK wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I'm using FreeBSD stable/12 built world on 12 April 2021. > > my setup is: > > [freebsd host cc0] <--------> [cc1 - same freebsd, but jail] > > > > without IPsec, I can achieve easily to 20Gbps. (test was run with > different > > source IPs using multiple iperf to scale across multiple queues) > > My hardware is Xeon D-2146NT (8 core + SoC Qat), cc0 and cc1 is Chelsio > > T62100-LP-CR. > > > > But with IPsec, throughput is limited to 2Gbps (with ccr) and only one > > netisr thread hits %100 cpu. > > with aesni throughput is 1,4 Gbps > > with QAT throughput is 1,6 Gbps (qat0 C62x, qat1 C62x) > > with CCR throughput is 2,0 Gbps (t6nex0) > > But always bottleneck is netisr. > > > > Is there any way to workaround this netisr bottleneck ? > > I tried to switch net.isr.dispatch to deferred and hybrid, but > performance > > drops a bit. > > I can suggest a couple of things to try. First, we configure only one > netisr thread by default. You can create more by setting the > net.isr.maxthreads loader tunable. I believe netipsec selects a thread > using the SPI so adding more threads might not help much depending on > your configuration, but testing with e.g., maxthreads =3D ncpu could be > illuminating. > > Second, netipsec unconditionally hands rx processing off to netisr > threads for some reason, that's why changing the dispatch policy doesn't > help. Maybe it's to help avoid running out of kernel stack space or to > somehow avoid packet reordering in some case that is not clear to me. I > tried a patch (see below) which eliminates this and it helped somewhat. > If anyone can provide an explanation for the current behaviour I'd > appreciate it. > > Could you try both approaches and report back? It would also be > interesting to know how your results compare with 13.0, if possible. > > commit 618ab87449d412a74bfee4932d84a6fc17afce6c > Author: Mark Johnston > Date: Thu Jan 7 11:29:14 2021 -0500 > > netipsec: Avoid deferred dispatch on the input path > > diff --git a/sys/netipsec/ipsec_input.c b/sys/netipsec/ipsec_input.c > index 48acba68a1fe..98d0954c4c53 100644 > --- a/sys/netipsec/ipsec_input.c > +++ b/sys/netipsec/ipsec_input.c > @@ -425,7 +425,7 @@ ipsec4_common_input_cb(struct mbuf *m, struct secasva= r > *sav, int skip, > error =3D ipsec_if_input(m, sav, af); > if (error =3D=3D 0) { > NET_EPOCH_ENTER(et); > - error =3D netisr_queue_src(isr_prot, (uintptr_t)sav->spi,= m); > + error =3D netisr_dispatch_src(isr_prot, (uintptr_t)sav->s= pi, > m); > NET_EPOCH_EXIT(et); > if (error) { > IPSEC_ISTAT(sproto, qfull); > @@ -624,7 +624,7 @@ ipsec6_common_input_cb(struct mbuf *m, struct secasva= r > *sav, int skip, > error =3D ipsec_if_input(m, sav, af); > if (error =3D=3D 0) { > NET_EPOCH_ENTER(et); > - error =3D netisr_queue_src(isr_prot, > + error =3D netisr_dispatch_src(isr_prot, > (uintptr_t)sav->spi, m); > NET_EPOCH_EXIT(et); > if (error) { > From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Apr 30 21:32:10 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAF5562B2C4 for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 21:32:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ozkan.kirik@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vs1-xe34.google.com (mail-vs1-xe34.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::e34]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FX5DT6bthz3h13; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 21:32:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ozkan.kirik@gmail.com) Received: by mail-vs1-xe34.google.com with SMTP id c21so4663579vso.11; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 14:32:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=amIZOH0gwU9vOHSi2Ln8DgJZramxS6dFn2QYo9Q0TA0=; b=q3y0vK76xLABq3en4oiC0NJJ+iUeouXISilOyTRntBAApKKO4MZh6/idxkvRXwhmy9 PtFB4sdMRO4JbMWQldfBlQi/ReWmBzQr2MY/nP/HUg/64DT2uMt2tHLO3aTJYdcF4mpy leDmdNjIgTg52nJwAbs+QdMthKgpHb9ULSSysbwOR0GoF1y/KKdfv/zY+YJneXAShrOG 0p/ZAWXte+bIED0fZGwhhZUz0EIcUr7h0PPQXKFIKqGZSSUMiC4RfrW0z26e4nxKhy9u dfi+fsvc4DLYD69G6XKz5Hcj5OBBnAnt4WOdM5bPH1qe0X2d68U+kmf51u/7N2pq7amD W+Cw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=amIZOH0gwU9vOHSi2Ln8DgJZramxS6dFn2QYo9Q0TA0=; b=p7KVFnzveZUwY0AJG9AfsdDUFicOz4a/uf9M1fN5eG0Ct9ZGCQDUjgGLnMZukZUw4R ejM4CVAfKlmNtxHU8OVqkhW5NkP0FgMaYV80FX92cbVIFomN/8hAxNC7bVyu9lDotrn6 lCWu7s3Cl+VTsEm+VQeO3+fXWY5JPjo7MfzdRi7qBv55RANOv7nnClP7cAFR1tH0hJea 1tOczDrdLXNWcTi1rd8RzcyZI8aiPGlR/OJilUFr1SN1Xwl/K2T/UuLFn6LfGDcQy5j7 1/q1DikZPrsJOFq+4MSqGAdfEt7/wqboNQcCyaRWEdRnGbGej4ajYxZQwh6ZHPFpgnGp MWUQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5336raIm0q10yiG0pxGPJonhmMBpWhmeiqdU2rAZZnbzJE/A1OQG b7E9Y/pAxhi0QjCo2dCSomdIUuMBCCkcg4QIpVO0/a9I2LCWCA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxRNtSvRp+F8FSvoecCLBpcGRF6Texf1df+z2og58MtlxA55QEq1st+ECjEc1EfEitzZBEbFZ6QLf/CKbWliyk= X-Received: by 2002:a67:f988:: with SMTP id b8mr8969336vsq.14.1619818328276; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 14:32:08 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: =?UTF-8?B?w5Z6a2FuIEtJUklL?= Date: Sat, 1 May 2021 00:31:57 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: IPsec performace - netisr hits %100 To: Mark Johnston Cc: FreeBSD Net X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FX5DT6bthz3h13 X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=q3y0vK76; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of ozkankirik@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::e34 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=ozkankirik@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.38 / 15.00]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::e34:from]; R_MIXED_CHARSET(0.62)[subject]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com:dkim]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::e34:from:127.0.2.255]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::e34:from]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-net] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.34 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2021 21:32:10 -0000 Hello again, patch is applied, now netisr is not eating CPU. but performance drops around 0.2Gbps according to previous kernel. I tried also both net.isr.maxthreads=3D1 and net.isr.maxthreads=3D4 . resul= ts are same Results are: - with CCR - 1.8Gbps top: PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND 14 root -16 - 0B 16K CPU5 5 1:38 100.00% [crypto returns 8] 3 root -16 - 0B 16K CPU1 1 0:58 77.83% [crypto returns 0] 11 root -92 - 0B 1120K WAIT 4 0:46 41.77% [intr{irq295: t6nex0:0a0}] 11 root -92 - 0B 1120K WAIT 8 0:37 36.83% [intr{irq297: t6nex0:0a2}] 11 root -92 - 0B 1120K WAIT 12 0:19 21.05% [intr{irq307: t6nex0:1a2}] 5376 root 23 0 23M 4348K CPU10 10 0:00 3.77% iperf -B 172.16.70.10 -c 172.16.68.1 -P 2 -t 20{iperf} 5376 root 23 0 23M 4348K sbwait 3 0:00 3.72% iperf -B 172.16.70.10 -c 172.16.68.1 -P 2 -t 20{iperf} 5358 root 22 0 23M 4348K sbwait 12 0:00 3.72% iperf -B 172.16.70.4 -c 172.16.68.1 -P 2 -t 20{iperf} ... - with aesni - 1.25Gbps PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND 14 root -16 - 0B 16K CPU7 7 1:59 99.66% [crypto returns 8] 3 root -16 - 0B 16K CPU3 3 1:10 46.09% [crypto returns 0] 11 root -92 - 0B 1120K CPU14 14 0:45 38.65% [intr{irq297: t6nex0:0a2}] 0 root -20 - 0B 2144K - 8 0:02 20.42% [kernel{crypto_12}] 0 root -20 - 0B 2144K - 5 0:02 18.54% [kernel{crypto_7}] 0 root -20 - 0B 2144K CPU4 4 0:02 18.28% [kernel{crypto_10}] 0 root -20 - 0B 2144K - 9 0:01 17.87% [kernel{crypto_5}] 0 root -20 - 0B 2144K - 11 0:02 17.66% [kernel{crypto_14}] 0 root -20 - 0B 2144K CPU15 15 0:02 16.94% [kernel{crypto_15}] 0 root -20 - 0B 2144K CPU2 2 0:00 16.91% [kernel{crypto_4}] 11 root -92 - 0B 1120K WAIT 12 0:23 16.41% [intr{irq307: t6nex0:1a2}] 0 root -20 - 0B 2144K - 6 0:02 16.28% [kernel{crypto_13}] 0 root -20 - 0B 2144K CPU14 14 0:02 14.86% [kernel{crypto_11}] 0 root -20 - 0B 2144K - 11 0:01 7.37% [kernel{crypto_9}] 5761 root 22 0 23M 4348K sbwait 13 0:00 3.96% iperf -B 172.16.70.6 -c 172.16.68.1 -P 2 -t 20{iperf} 5761 root 22 0 23M 4348K sbwait 5 0:00 3.86% iperf -B 172.16.70.6 -c 172.16.68.1 -P 2 -t 20{iperf} ... - with QAT - 1.46 Gbps PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND 3 root -16 - 0B 16K RUN 0 1:23 93.46% [crypto returns 0] 14 root -16 - 0B 16K crypto 2 2:10 35.31% [crypto returns 8] 11 root -92 - 0B 1664K WAIT 8 0:50 21.83% [intr{irq297: t6nex0:0a2}] 11 root -92 - 0B 1664K WAIT 12 0:25 9.72% [intr{irq307: t6nex0:1a2}] 11 root -92 - 0B 1664K WAIT 8 0:00 4.12% [intr{irq368: qat1}] 6103 root 21 0 23M 4348K sbwait 12 0:00 3.88% iperf -B 172.16.70.1 -c 172.16.68.1 -P 2 -t 20{iperf} 6124 root 22 0 23M 4348K sbwait 4 0:00 3.63% iperf -B 172.16.70.8 -c 172.16.68.1 -P 2 -t 20{iperf} On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 11:40 PM =C3=96zkan KIRIK w= rote: > Thank you Mark, > > I'm going to recompile kernel with this patch and share results. > After a few days, I can install stable/13 on same hardware and then I'll > repeat same tests. > > Thanks again, > Cheers > > On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 11:32 PM Mark Johnston wrote: > >> On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 11:11:48PM +0300, =C3=96zkan KIRIK wrote: >> > Hello, >> > >> > I'm using FreeBSD stable/12 built world on 12 April 2021. >> > my setup is: >> > [freebsd host cc0] <--------> [cc1 - same freebsd, but jail] >> > >> > without IPsec, I can achieve easily to 20Gbps. (test was run with >> different >> > source IPs using multiple iperf to scale across multiple queues) >> > My hardware is Xeon D-2146NT (8 core + SoC Qat), cc0 and cc1 is Chelsi= o >> > T62100-LP-CR. >> > >> > But with IPsec, throughput is limited to 2Gbps (with ccr) and only one >> > netisr thread hits %100 cpu. >> > with aesni throughput is 1,4 Gbps >> > with QAT throughput is 1,6 Gbps (qat0 C62x, qat1 C62x) >> > with CCR throughput is 2,0 Gbps (t6nex0) >> > But always bottleneck is netisr. >> > >> > Is there any way to workaround this netisr bottleneck ? >> > I tried to switch net.isr.dispatch to deferred and hybrid, but >> performance >> > drops a bit. >> >> I can suggest a couple of things to try. First, we configure only one >> netisr thread by default. You can create more by setting the >> net.isr.maxthreads loader tunable. I believe netipsec selects a thread >> using the SPI so adding more threads might not help much depending on >> your configuration, but testing with e.g., maxthreads =3D ncpu could be >> illuminating. >> >> Second, netipsec unconditionally hands rx processing off to netisr >> threads for some reason, that's why changing the dispatch policy doesn't >> help. Maybe it's to help avoid running out of kernel stack space or to >> somehow avoid packet reordering in some case that is not clear to me. I >> tried a patch (see below) which eliminates this and it helped somewhat. >> If anyone can provide an explanation for the current behaviour I'd >> appreciate it. >> >> Could you try both approaches and report back? It would also be >> interesting to know how your results compare with 13.0, if possible. >> >> commit 618ab87449d412a74bfee4932d84a6fc17afce6c >> Author: Mark Johnston >> Date: Thu Jan 7 11:29:14 2021 -0500 >> >> netipsec: Avoid deferred dispatch on the input path >> >> diff --git a/sys/netipsec/ipsec_input.c b/sys/netipsec/ipsec_input.c >> index 48acba68a1fe..98d0954c4c53 100644 >> --- a/sys/netipsec/ipsec_input.c >> +++ b/sys/netipsec/ipsec_input.c >> @@ -425,7 +425,7 @@ ipsec4_common_input_cb(struct mbuf *m, struct >> secasvar *sav, int skip, >> error =3D ipsec_if_input(m, sav, af); >> if (error =3D=3D 0) { >> NET_EPOCH_ENTER(et); >> - error =3D netisr_queue_src(isr_prot, (uintptr_t)sav->spi= , >> m); >> + error =3D netisr_dispatch_src(isr_prot, >> (uintptr_t)sav->spi, m); >> NET_EPOCH_EXIT(et); >> if (error) { >> IPSEC_ISTAT(sproto, qfull); >> @@ -624,7 +624,7 @@ ipsec6_common_input_cb(struct mbuf *m, struct >> secasvar *sav, int skip, >> error =3D ipsec_if_input(m, sav, af); >> if (error =3D=3D 0) { >> NET_EPOCH_ENTER(et); >> - error =3D netisr_queue_src(isr_prot, >> + error =3D netisr_dispatch_src(isr_prot, >> (uintptr_t)sav->spi, m); >> NET_EPOCH_EXIT(et); >> if (error) { >> > From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Apr 30 21:45:30 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C1DD62B737 for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 21:45:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from markjdb@gmail.com) Received: from mail-io1-xd34.google.com (mail-io1-xd34.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d34]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FX5Ws0ZvGz3hmB for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 21:45:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from markjdb@gmail.com) Received: by mail-io1-xd34.google.com with SMTP id t21so18288297iob.2 for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 14:45:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to; bh=oXSEeLZmYaDYuTRBYxLZU5E3QFGkS3nRnG4iskWXRUw=; b=DueCkMhZkPJkbd1LcMFU5j0odNmfRcvhpbkg+wNOei83O1+2oW/Zv77NAw3g/csADX K+CTh+AUGpmtZa3h6bQKXZaoyI/H0OThpAJQC4VMwg1LGhVXg2hrq8z6jIobOCEPy2ho obK4VIQEQDgzgwjz9MTP2RbsSpFRUkV3dCjO27l+mPLCbY1vFVhqwnDe2ZqD2EEdGnqb vDWe0BhGH44GDFY6pLbNqkHaQrIyBMBXMwTybV0/iTUjh7p6cNTgxLBzrfzZduDYSMtN azCaoXEd+LqfvPpFCLi2bHlFqggVZEr2QVUd2Dc1S4olZtfEe3hhPXSz49HH6bmOZlSL y8gQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-disposition :content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to; bh=oXSEeLZmYaDYuTRBYxLZU5E3QFGkS3nRnG4iskWXRUw=; b=PYOkDfsZvOi+MZDRfe9OrSK17RjJVv9csQb3FsYyTSgf2DEBs5ytPeBPUEh2Qf8AKD KzMCaXu3eBRb4B36beESYRuGD6QTAZmiySoXzKbC4+hqxpnquqPHi06JtOJ901xScGjm QmZxw875jlab+elFFizhmNrA+zWjtdOXV3kn9k+7uq1kikeIV98hIjZAsAcGl/aI83sl M70q4ECcR2RdiQalcytTIif6ULs2MGAUKXnt2BHFPu2XKML/BEr+LS5QJ2ZS8J59KQLa w5W9BPlXsY11IS1+ft0MHPKtlQHEC0JfbiablzUc3ZoLjkRVtpluGDYd2yh+EiYV7FEO Zfdg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532rfhrHm4lS7tJnWdN9uZVPl6FfjS/cjEjQBRGnH/2qwVhTcE4j UMZ4hHh7UPpS+URlz4mnG8s= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwn8rnX0mYRZb7/itMEE02WdtNqff/H+Pdj/GfhY+Vz5GQ/2Wkqhf/tKxj1Ox3Mfbqq7lnDvA== X-Received: by 2002:a02:9048:: with SMTP id y8mr6830488jaf.66.1619819127860; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 14:45:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nuc ([142.126.164.150]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m8sm1398685ilc.13.2021.04.30.14.45.27 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 30 Apr 2021 14:45:27 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Mark Johnston Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2021 17:45:28 -0400 From: Mark Johnston To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?=D6zkan?= KIRIK Cc: FreeBSD Net Subject: Re: IPsec performace - netisr hits %100 Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FX5Ws0ZvGz3hmB X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=DueCkMhZ; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of markjdb@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::d34 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=markjdb@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.70 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[gmail.com]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[markj@freebsd.org,markjdb@gmail.com]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::d34:from]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[markj@freebsd.org,markjdb@gmail.com]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-net@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[freebsd.org]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::d34:from:127.0.2.255]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::d34:from]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-net] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2021 21:45:30 -0000 On Sat, May 01, 2021 at 12:31:57AM +0300, Özkan KIRIK wrote: > Hello again, > > patch is applied, now netisr is not eating CPU. but performance drops > around 0.2Gbps according to previous kernel. > > I tried also both net.isr.maxthreads=1 and net.isr.maxthreads=4 . results > are same > > Results are: > > - with CCR - 1.8Gbps > top: > PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND > 14 root -16 - 0B 16K CPU5 5 1:38 100.00% [crypto > returns 8] > 3 root -16 - 0B 16K CPU1 1 0:58 77.83% [crypto > returns 0] Could you also try this patch? It won't help with aesni. diff --git a/sys/opencrypto/crypto.c b/sys/opencrypto/crypto.c index dfd22662e87f..bc23056e86ad 100644 --- a/sys/opencrypto/crypto.c +++ b/sys/opencrypto/crypto.c @@ -94,6 +94,7 @@ struct crypto_session { void *softc; uint32_t hid; uint32_t capabilities; + uint64_t id; }; SDT_PROVIDER_DEFINE(opencrypto); @@ -572,6 +573,7 @@ crypto_select_driver(const struct cryptoini *cri, int flags) int crypto_newsession(crypto_session_t *cses, struct cryptoini *cri, int crid) { + static uint64_t sessid = 0; crypto_session_t res; void *softc_mem; struct cryptocap *cap; @@ -616,6 +618,7 @@ crypto_newsession(crypto_session_t *cses, struct cryptoini *cri, int crid) softc_mem = malloc(softc_size, M_CRYPTO_DATA, M_WAITOK | M_ZERO); res = uma_zalloc(cryptoses_zone, M_WAITOK | M_ZERO); res->softc = softc_mem; + res->id = atomic_fetchadd_64(&sessid, 1); CRYPTO_DRIVER_LOCK(); cap = crypto_checkdriver(hid); @@ -1016,7 +1019,7 @@ crypto_dispatch(struct cryptop *crp) binuptime(&crp->crp_tstamp); #endif - crp->crp_retw_id = ((uintptr_t)crp->crp_session) % crypto_workers_num; + crp->crp_retw_id = crp->crp_session->id % crypto_workers_num; if (CRYPTOP_ASYNC(crp)) { if (crp->crp_flags & CRYPTO_F_ASYNC_KEEPORDER) { From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Apr 30 22:26:53 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D6C262C2A5 for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 22:26:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ozkan.kirik@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ua1-x930.google.com (mail-ua1-x930.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::930]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FX6Rc1fgvz3jpP; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 22:26:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ozkan.kirik@gmail.com) Received: by mail-ua1-x930.google.com with SMTP id x22so4273018uav.8; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 15:26:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=sVZaF7JjSGjeU5Ac0KB+ycsxiedF0a3R5Reo5qwpZF4=; b=UgOdb0W/VnnN1kO9AV9iY4Uf797phfpETO8Y+UP30Y7kBPMhdoH4c85+342jJu1KBM MzGo0kI8mfS6+WTcN2x8PuIvNHJ0rb92LYJQiwiIwJL60NACIFTHJah2RnMdZhrDeFtN X049lWdgillxOtKqjGLryTwisbH0+Zd1E76RgeOF010asYm6BcUTP4GhD446vG7rFf8P 2XZIck8n/tQ6i83iObZzkiwcVe5PDnmDD1aDoQs8lY3hNOi1fR6ypGpk1wObsj3VYmkd SUEuXMsEacMeKQuVzawznhPQritAhQE+amtWefVacwBARCI9us32fhN4pTodcSueOFpu FDHg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=sVZaF7JjSGjeU5Ac0KB+ycsxiedF0a3R5Reo5qwpZF4=; b=r547oSee6nOlAyJvegE9vJOJ1nsZ5EGHlACpRDJ9CuoO0BhZRFCUmWp1UycM5fPD2S aJB8h1cjnMpN8EU4A3WnMnldOUBmcln92iC/C9TRDlPKVL6GopA9kOPh6gXtiig82Ena vZMAqif0lBG5g8JX7GIGz+RS4oqQy8nMFe3lk3EPd7iCCOFBR27qDVolkKzvNRU64XHI C+txaE42p7aDSqzvX5P5TFMFsQV0PkotIBNnFsx8gsLtEdTUUThWPldvR10W/RiTFXwD cJbQ8SAAI9wmMY7uvmGlQzqfHpvDxcQ84sUloff41R8Sk2835WJ5dhMGz6pTr126htwI L4Bg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533+ek52pLzAs40G6hGaXDjkNswxzjFs6BRGB3AVw7g+fEBw0gl0 Ca+gAbOAjw0rfKDhWD5QAeaO9DnEqa5DFOMPpVVNbkJDlNrLFw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxC/OVrrSg8qv7Z6Hk1awq3SMa7l+gQpCUtP47hNmbw5C2ByFB+0L1Hz52w+4+LtfC5Mzw/0wmXo8Zhduip9NE= X-Received: by 2002:a9f:2404:: with SMTP id 4mr7658505uaq.48.1619821610884; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 15:26:50 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: =?UTF-8?B?w5Z6a2FuIEtJUklL?= Date: Sat, 1 May 2021 01:26:40 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: IPsec performace - netisr hits %100 To: Mark Johnston Cc: FreeBSD Net X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FX6Rc1fgvz3jpP X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=UgOdb0W/; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of ozkankirik@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::930 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=ozkankirik@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.28 / 15.00]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; MIME_BASE64_TEXT(0.10)[]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; R_MIXED_CHARSET(0.62)[subject]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com:dkim]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::930:from]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::930:from:127.0.2.255]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::930:from]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-net] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.34 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2021 22:26:53 -0000 Here is fresh results; a bit performance gain achieved. But strangely QAT is better now. - with CCR - 2.14 Gbps PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND 15 root -16 - 0B 16K CPU7 7 0:11 100.00% [crypto returns 9] 11 root -92 - 0B 1120K CPU4 4 0:10 98.74% [intr{irq295: t6nex0:0a0}] 14 root -16 - 0B 16K CPU11 11 0:09 95.32% [crypto returns 8] 11 root -92 - 0B 1120K CPU8 8 0:07 63.49% [intr{irq297: t6nex0:0a2}] 11 root -92 - 0B 1120K WAIT 12 0:05 42.73% [intr{irq307: t6nex0:1a2}] 16 root -16 - 0B 16K CPU15 15 0:04 33.82% [crypto returns 10] 13 root -16 - 0B 16K RUN 3 0:02 21.78% [crypto returns 7] 4317 root 22 0 23M 4348K sbwait 14 0:01 7.24% iperf -B 172.16.70.6 -c 172.16.68.1 -P 2 -t 20{iperf} 4329 root 23 0 23M 4348K sbwait 14 0:01 7.18% iperf -B 172.16.70.10 -c 172.16.68.1 -P 2 -t 20{iperf} ... 11 root -92 - 0B 1120K WAIT 3 0:00 0.31% [intr{irq294: t6nex0:evt}] 0 root -92 - 0B 2144K - 14 0:00 0.30% [kernel{t6nex0 tq0}] ... - with QAT - 2.63 Gbps PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND 8 root -16 - 0B 16K CPU7 7 0:31 92.05% [crypto returns 5] 7 root -16 - 0B 16K CPU0 0 0:29 86.03% [crypto returns 4] 9 root -16 - 0B 16K RUN 15 0:15 43.32% [crypto returns 6] 11 root -92 - 0B 1664K RUN 4 0:15 43.03% [intr{irq297: t6nex0:0a2}] 6 root -16 - 0B 16K crypto 4 0:09 26.01% [crypto returns 3] 11 root -92 - 0B 1664K WAIT 12 0:07 19.88% [intr{irq307: t6nex0:1a2}] 11 root -92 - 0B 1664K WAIT 8 0:02 7.22% [intr{irq368: qat1}] 4313 root 22 0 23M 4348K sbwait 2 0:01 6.51% iperf -B 172.16.70.8 -c 172.16.68.1 -P 2 -t 20{iperf} 4316 root 22 0 23M 4348K sbwait 3 0:01 6.18% iperf -B 172.16.70.9 -c 172.16.68.1 -P 2 -t 20{iperf} ... 11 root -92 - 0B 1664K WAIT 12 0:02 4.52% [intr{irq355: qat0}] ... 11 root -92 - 0B 1664K WAIT 12 0:01 1.89% [intr{irq372: qat1}] 11 root -92 - 0B 1664K WAIT 0 0:00 1.12% [intr{irq360: qat1}] 11 root -92 - 0B 1664K WAIT 2 0:00 1.11% [intr{irq362: qat1}] 11 root -92 - 0B 1664K WAIT 14 0:00 1.10% [intr{irq374: qat1}] 11 root -92 - 0B 1664K WAIT 4 0:00 1.10% [intr{irq364: qat1}] 11 root -92 - 0B 1664K WAIT 10 0:00 1.10% [intr{irq370: qat1}] 11 root -92 - 0B 1664K WAIT 7 0:00 1.09% [intr{irq367: qat1}] 11 root -92 - 0B 1664K WAIT 11 0:00 1.07% [intr{irq371: qat1}] 11 root -92 - 0B 1664K WAIT 5 0:00 1.04% [intr{irq365: qat1}] 11 root -92 - 0B 1664K WAIT 15 0:00 1.04% [intr{irq375: qat1}] 11 root -92 - 0B 1664K WAIT 1 0:00 1.04% [intr{irq361: qat1}] 11 root -92 - 0B 1664K WAIT 6 0:00 1.03% [intr{irq366: qat1}] On Sat, May 1, 2021 at 12:45 AM Mark Johnston wrote: > On Sat, May 01, 2021 at 12:31:57AM +0300, =C3=96zkan KIRIK wrote: > > Hello again, > > > > patch is applied, now netisr is not eating CPU. but performance drops > > around 0.2Gbps according to previous kernel. > > > > I tried also both net.isr.maxthreads=3D1 and net.isr.maxthreads=3D4 . r= esults > > are same > > > > Results are: > > > > - with CCR - 1.8Gbps > > top: > > PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE C TIME WCPU > COMMAND > > 14 root -16 - 0B 16K CPU5 5 1:38 100.00% > [crypto > > returns 8] > > 3 root -16 - 0B 16K CPU1 1 0:58 77.83% > [crypto > > returns 0] > > Could you also try this patch? It won't help with aesni. > > diff --git a/sys/opencrypto/crypto.c b/sys/opencrypto/crypto.c > index dfd22662e87f..bc23056e86ad 100644 > --- a/sys/opencrypto/crypto.c > +++ b/sys/opencrypto/crypto.c > @@ -94,6 +94,7 @@ struct crypto_session { > void *softc; > uint32_t hid; > uint32_t capabilities; > + uint64_t id; > }; > > SDT_PROVIDER_DEFINE(opencrypto); > @@ -572,6 +573,7 @@ crypto_select_driver(const struct cryptoini *cri, int > flags) > int > crypto_newsession(crypto_session_t *cses, struct cryptoini *cri, int cri= d) > { > + static uint64_t sessid =3D 0; > crypto_session_t res; > void *softc_mem; > struct cryptocap *cap; > @@ -616,6 +618,7 @@ crypto_newsession(crypto_session_t *cses, struct > cryptoini *cri, int crid) > softc_mem =3D malloc(softc_size, M_CRYPTO_DATA, M_WAITOK | M_ZERO= ); > res =3D uma_zalloc(cryptoses_zone, M_WAITOK | M_ZERO); > res->softc =3D softc_mem; > + res->id =3D atomic_fetchadd_64(&sessid, 1); > > CRYPTO_DRIVER_LOCK(); > cap =3D crypto_checkdriver(hid); > @@ -1016,7 +1019,7 @@ crypto_dispatch(struct cryptop *crp) > binuptime(&crp->crp_tstamp); > #endif > > - crp->crp_retw_id =3D ((uintptr_t)crp->crp_session) % > crypto_workers_num; > + crp->crp_retw_id =3D crp->crp_session->id % crypto_workers_num; > > if (CRYPTOP_ASYNC(crp)) { > if (crp->crp_flags & CRYPTO_F_ASYNC_KEEPORDER) { > From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sat May 1 10:19:25 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1ACF5FAAD8 for ; Sat, 1 May 2021 10:19:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FXQFn4vwTz3vN1 for ; Sat, 1 May 2021 10:19:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id A88795FAA67; Sat, 1 May 2021 10:19:25 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A84E15FAD46 for ; Sat, 1 May 2021 10:19:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FXQFn4F1Xz3vF1 for ; Sat, 1 May 2021 10:19:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 836B215ECD for ; Sat, 1 May 2021 10:19:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 141AJPhw008353 for ; Sat, 1 May 2021 10:19:25 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 141AJPuM008352 for net@FreeBSD.org; Sat, 1 May 2021 10:19:25 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 230996] em/igb: Intel i210/i350: ifconfig: enabling "vlanhwtag" renders VLAN on i210/i350 NICs unusable Date: Sat, 01 May 2021 10:19:25 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: IntelNetworking, needs-qa, performance, regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: kaho@elam.kais.kyoto-u.ac.jp X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? mfc-stable12? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: attachments.created Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 May 2021 10:19:25 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D230996 --- Comment #28 from Kaho Toshikazu --- Created attachment 224588 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D224588&action= =3Dedit iflib-vlan patch It contains a correction of iflib side with debug code, and it does not conflicts other patch. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sat May 1 10:47:18 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A80C35FC115 for ; Sat, 1 May 2021 10:47:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FXQsy4BG9z3wJW for ; Sat, 1 May 2021 10:47:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 8FB5D5FBC30; Sat, 1 May 2021 10:47:18 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F80C5FBF3E for ; Sat, 1 May 2021 10:47:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FXQsy3bH4z3wKf for ; Sat, 1 May 2021 10:47:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 690ED163BA for ; Sat, 1 May 2021 10:47:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 141AlIxD023272 for ; Sat, 1 May 2021 10:47:18 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 141AlImv023271 for net@FreeBSD.org; Sat, 1 May 2021 10:47:18 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 238411] igb(4): Wake on Lan not working with Intel I210 Date: Sat, 01 May 2021 10:47:17 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: IntelNetworking, needs-qa, regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: kaho@elam.kais.kyoto-u.ac.jp X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? mfc-stable13? mfc-stable12? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 May 2021 10:47:18 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D238411 --- Comment #21 from Kaho Toshikazu --- (In reply to Abraham122x from comment #20) FreeBSD 12 and 13 have almost same code but 11 has difference. I think that wol capability is not set with these type devices on FreeBSD 1= 1, then you can not toggle enable/disable wol by using ifconfig. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sat May 1 12:39:44 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E362B62923D for ; Sat, 1 May 2021 12:39:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ozkan.kirik@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vk1-xa31.google.com (mail-vk1-xa31.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::a31]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FXTMg6659z4Vsm; Sat, 1 May 2021 12:39:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ozkan.kirik@gmail.com) Received: by mail-vk1-xa31.google.com with SMTP id n74so286373vkc.6; Sat, 01 May 2021 05:39:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=3phYNPFXIoOgPBRtCWBQELOx6vHBCdspUBKRTHCqGok=; b=RpQQUoFA1hBbOoPQCg9joGwfYFH7bFHz3kG+/0Rqs1x0/2FKtZQo8wSuVQDGnR93e1 VB+Juflh74QnloEDDzB5FX5j/CcvgAvCCxSoyqEFkm/FiIHhvz3B/y90/AaQHqGi0fX7 oLVSI7/DWRBTE2noLMYnSi7oOf4O62eBbpYIjs7KJpaW9lSnqJs6YyeZLS5uEUPa10wU JgmYk66fKOVEJIzNH7iiWnKV0ttuBqEsJT8PLrKRxKHiynqZLTSnCc9yzcooqHv1QGwO hyUSuZx4UxSFrHhhna5rxB4dHVmP5JZwnzmRK4QXldxy1DCMZOO4KBW7r/wdpY7ql/Jc WKVA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=3phYNPFXIoOgPBRtCWBQELOx6vHBCdspUBKRTHCqGok=; b=Pa/D8n8ac99Yo+WQiNwSWKnW039OdYbPotSirzxLBIen5NJEZ7yhjpmFdn+bk9/0SZ vx/MG7f17xMHdDr4NGP12lUIoORuUankEqycZC5FDXeMP9CVRKsBEB22Lk/sZY4+IwyF 9zm0cAT7zBkSy+IvFLScR+/pNNGHc1fBDm5RME2BYhjdt6C7+kf4kuMEwhRpUk/l9Dxk kC7zvMe3ynFnmPUkjMwnpZvqi8Wcl0YRjTLuJh33R7n8KdzNaiShORLy/sWGFDAdo0TD QUXRDrdf6yH/gs10UBn9k4Q3OXNDbZG303MPFAtys08W8hQRJNey5WGqkikWkmQIYAz2 He3A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5320D4hNQxTkyEm9jSRWTuhaDNvby+coc4HUjvTUyfllqGgOmSjJ d3rmbp3A1P6/ycwN+5e58/X/YL8/s36niWddjsbOGb2iZZ0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwknmCFD5/C9ZQccDZTvvWFeTiUiw/p8pGjL/UEiQufH403M8eM6I/jLGPqakmXWPJIwQkoKAuCRsvy+lyDXNE= X-Received: by 2002:a1f:dc45:: with SMTP id t66mr2078788vkg.23.1619872782047; Sat, 01 May 2021 05:39:42 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: =?UTF-8?B?w5Z6a2FuIEtJUklL?= Date: Sat, 1 May 2021 15:39:30 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: IPsec performace - netisr hits %100 To: Mark Johnston Cc: FreeBSD Net X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FXTMg6659z4Vsm X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=RpQQUoFA; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of ozkankirik@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::a31 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=ozkankirik@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.37 / 15.00]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; R_MIXED_CHARSET(0.62)[subject]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com:dkim]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::a31:from]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::a31:from:127.0.2.255]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::a31:from]; HTTP_TO_IP(1.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-net] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.34 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 May 2021 12:39:44 -0000 I've pulled the latest stable/13 branch and make buildworld. Same configuration and same usage, ping works between two sides, iperf can connect to server but no data transferred. throughput is around 10Kbps. I tried both with and without netipsec/ipsec_input.c patch, but no change. There is something wrong with ipsec (or ipsec in jail) in stable/13. iperf between host and jail works without ipsec. I saw some errors in truss output show as a brief: write(3,"@\^A\0x\0\0\0\^A\0\0\^S\M^I\0\0"...,131072) ERR#35 'Resource temporarily unavailable' recvfrom(3,0x8018048c0,131072,0,0x0,0x0) ERR#35 'Resource temporarily unavailable' _umtx_op(0x80026e008,UMTX_OP_WAIT_UINT_PRIVATE,0x0,0x18,0x7fffdfffdec8) ERR#60 'Operation timed out' Full output of truss output is below: root@host # jexec client bash [root@client /]# truss iperf -B 172.16.70.1 -c 172.16.68.1 2>&1 | grep -v clock_nanosleep mmap(0x0,135168,PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANON,-1,0x0) =3D 34362150912 (0x80024d000) mprotect(0x80024a000,4096,PROT_READ) =3D 0 (0x0) issetugid() =3D 0 (0x0) sigfastblock(0x1,0x80024c510) =3D 0 (0x0) open("/etc/libmap.conf",O_RDONLY|O_CLOEXEC,011136710) =3D 3 (0x3) fstat(3,{ mode=3D-rw-r--r-- ,inode=3D482,size=3D47,blksize=3D4096 }) =3D 0 = (0x0) read(3,"# $FreeBSD$\nincludedir /usr/loc"...,47) =3D 47 (0x2f) close(3) =3D 0 (0x0) open("/usr/local/etc/libmap.d",O_RDONLY|O_NONBLOCK|O_DIRECTORY|O_CLOEXEC,01= 65) ERR#2 'No such file or directory' open("/var/run/ld-elf.so.hints",O_RDONLY|O_CLOEXEC,010015464) =3D 3 (0x3) read(3,"Ehnt\^A\0\0\0\M^@\0\0\0\M-U\0\0"...,128) =3D 128 (0x80) fstat(3,{ mode=3D-r--r--r-- ,inode=3D187,size=3D341,blksize=3D4096 }) =3D 0= (0x0) pread(3,"/lib:/usr/lib:/usr/local/lib:/us"...,213,0x80) =3D 213 (0xd5) close(3) =3D 0 (0x0) open("/lib/libthr.so.3",O_RDONLY|O_CLOEXEC|O_VERIFY,00) =3D 3 (0x3) fstat(3,{ mode=3D-r--r--r-- ,inode=3D186701,size=3D125952,blksize=3D32768 }= ) =3D 0 (0x0) mmap(0x0,4096,PROT_READ,MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_PREFAULT_READ,3,0x0) =3D 3436228608= 0 (0x80026e000) mmap(0x0,184320,PROT_NONE,MAP_GUARD,-1,0x0) =3D 34362290176 (0x80026f000) mmap(0x80026f000,53248,PROT_READ,MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_NOCORE|MAP_PREFA= ULT_READ,3,0x0) =3D 34362290176 (0x80026f000) mmap(0x80027c000,73728,PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC,MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_NOCORE= |MAP_PREFAULT_READ,3,0xc000) =3D 34362343424 (0x80027c000) mmap(0x80028e000,4096,PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_PREFAU= LT_READ,3,0x1d000) =3D 34362417152 (0x80028e000) mmap(0x80028f000,8192,PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_PREFAU= LT_READ,3,0x1d000) =3D 34362421248 (0x80028f000) mmap(0x800291000,45056,PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_ANON,= -1,0x0) =3D 34362429440 (0x800291000) munmap(0x80026e000,4096) =3D 0 (0x0) close(3) =3D 0 (0x0) open("/lib/librt.so.1",O_RDONLY|O_CLOEXEC|O_VERIFY,066000) ERR#2 'No such file or directory' open("/usr/lib/librt.so.1",O_RDONLY|O_CLOEXEC|O_VERIFY,066000) =3D 3 (0x3) fstat(3,{ mode=3D-r--r--r-- ,inode=3D411606,size=3D22824,blksize=3D32768 })= =3D 0 (0x0) mmap(0x0,4096,PROT_READ,MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_PREFAULT_READ,3,0x0) =3D 3436228608= 0 (0x80026e000) mmap(0x0,36864,PROT_NONE,MAP_GUARD,-1,0x0) =3D 34362474496 (0x80029c000) mmap(0x80029c000,12288,PROT_READ,MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_NOCORE|MAP_PREFA= ULT_READ,3,0x0) =3D 34362474496 (0x80029c000) mmap(0x80029f000,12288,PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC,MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_NOCORE= |MAP_PREFAULT_READ,3,0x2000) =3D 34362486784 (0x80029f000) mmap(0x8002a2000,4096,PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_PREFAU= LT_READ,3,0x4000) =3D 34362499072 (0x8002a2000) mmap(0x8002a3000,4096,PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_PREFAU= LT_READ,3,0x4000) =3D 34362503168 (0x8002a3000) mmap(0x8002a4000,4096,PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_ANON,-= 1,0x0) =3D 34362507264 (0x8002a4000) munmap(0x80026e000,4096) =3D 0 (0x0) close(3) =3D 0 (0x0) open("/lib/libc++.so.1",O_RDONLY|O_CLOEXEC|O_VERIFY,00) ERR#2 'No such file or directory' open("/usr/lib/libc++.so.1",O_RDONLY|O_CLOEXEC|O_VERIFY,00) =3D 3 (0x3) fstat(3,{ mode=3D-r--r--r-- ,inode=3D411469,size=3D824056,blksize=3D32768 }= ) =3D 0 (0x0) mmap(0x0,4096,PROT_READ,MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_PREFAULT_READ,3,0x0) =3D 3436228608= 0 (0x80026e000) mmap(0x0,860160,PROT_NONE,MAP_GUARD,-1,0x0) =3D 34362511360 (0x8002a5000) mmap(0x8002a5000,376832,PROT_READ,MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_NOCORE|MAP_PREF= AULT_READ,3,0x0) =3D 34362511360 (0x8002a5000) mmap(0x800301000,425984,PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC,MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_NOCOR= E|MAP_PREFAULT_READ,3,0x5b000) =3D 34362888192 (0x800301000) mmap(0x800369000,24576,PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_PREFA= ULT_READ,3,0xc2000) =3D 34363314176 (0x800369000) mmap(0x80036f000,8192,PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_PREFAU= LT_READ,3,0xc7000) =3D 34363338752 (0x80036f000) mmap(0x800371000,24576,PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_ANON,= -1,0x0) =3D 34363346944 (0x800371000) munmap(0x80026e000,4096) =3D 0 (0x0) close(3) =3D 0 (0x0) open("/lib/libcxxrt.so.1",O_RDONLY|O_CLOEXEC|O_VERIFY,041400) =3D 3 (0x3) fstat(3,{ mode=3D-r--r--r-- ,inode=3D186668,size=3D113688,blksize=3D32768 }= ) =3D 0 (0x0) mmap(0x0,4096,PROT_READ,MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_PREFAULT_READ,3,0x0) =3D 3436228608= 0 (0x80026e000) mmap(0x0,143360,PROT_NONE,MAP_GUARD,-1,0x0) =3D 34363371520 (0x800377000) mmap(0x800377000,53248,PROT_READ,MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_NOCORE|MAP_PREFA= ULT_READ,3,0x0) =3D 34363371520 (0x800377000) mmap(0x800384000,61440,PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC,MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_NOCORE= |MAP_PREFAULT_READ,3,0xc000) =3D 34363424768 (0x800384000) mmap(0x800393000,4096,PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_PREFAU= LT_READ,3,0x1a000) =3D 34363486208 (0x800393000) mmap(0x800394000,8192,PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_PREFAU= LT_READ,3,0x1a000) =3D 34363490304 (0x800394000) mmap(0x800396000,16384,PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_ANON,= -1,0x0) =3D 34363498496 (0x800396000) munmap(0x80026e000,4096) =3D 0 (0x0) close(3) =3D 0 (0x0) open("/lib/libm.so.5",O_RDONLY|O_CLOEXEC|O_VERIFY,00) =3D 3 (0x3) fstat(3,{ mode=3D-r--r--r-- ,inode=3D186671,size=3D214192,blksize=3D32768 }= ) =3D 0 (0x0) mmap(0x0,4096,PROT_READ,MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_PREFAULT_READ,3,0x0) =3D 3436228608= 0 (0x80026e000) mmap(0x0,225280,PROT_NONE,MAP_GUARD,-1,0x0) =3D 34363514880 (0x80039a000) mmap(0x80039a000,73728,PROT_READ,MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_NOCORE|MAP_PREFA= ULT_READ,3,0x0) =3D 34363514880 (0x80039a000) mmap(0x8003ac000,143360,PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC,MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_NOCOR= E|MAP_PREFAULT_READ,3,0x11000) =3D 34363588608 (0x8003ac000) mmap(0x8003cf000,4096,PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_PREFAU= LT_READ,3,0x33000) =3D 34363731968 (0x8003cf000) mmap(0x8003d0000,4096,PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_PREFAU= LT_READ,3,0x33000) =3D 34363736064 (0x8003d0000) munmap(0x80026e000,4096) =3D 0 (0x0) close(3) =3D 0 (0x0) open("/lib/libgcc_s.so.1",O_RDONLY|O_CLOEXEC|O_VERIFY,020643400) =3D 3 (0x3= ) fstat(3,{ mode=3D-r--r--r-- ,inode=3D186687,size=3D93448,blksize=3D32768 })= =3D 0 (0x0) mmap(0x0,4096,PROT_READ,MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_PREFAULT_READ,3,0x0) =3D 3436228608= 0 (0x80026e000) mmap(0x0,106496,PROT_NONE,MAP_GUARD,-1,0x0) =3D 34363740160 (0x8003d1000) mmap(0x8003d1000,36864,PROT_READ,MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_NOCORE|MAP_PREFA= ULT_READ,3,0x0) =3D 34363740160 (0x8003d1000) mmap(0x8003da000,57344,PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC,MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_NOCORE= |MAP_PREFAULT_READ,3,0x8000) =3D 34363777024 (0x8003da000) mmap(0x8003e8000,8192,PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_PREFAU= LT_READ,3,0x15000) =3D 34363834368 (0x8003e8000) mmap(0x8003ea000,4096,PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_PREFAU= LT_READ,3,0x16000) =3D 34363842560 (0x8003ea000) munmap(0x80026e000,4096) =3D 0 (0x0) close(3) =3D 0 (0x0) open("/lib/libc.so.7",O_RDONLY|O_CLOEXEC|O_VERIFY,00) =3D 3 (0x3) fstat(3,{ mode=3D-r--r--r-- ,inode=3D186667,size=3D1904424,blksize=3D32768 = }) =3D 0 (0x0) mmap(0x0,4096,PROT_READ,MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_PREFAULT_READ,3,0x0) =3D 3436228608= 0 (0x80026e000) mmap(0x0,4182016,PROT_NONE,MAP_GUARD,-1,0x0) =3D 34363846656 (0x8003eb000) mmap(0x8003eb000,520192,PROT_READ,MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_NOCORE|MAP_PREF= AULT_READ,3,0x0) =3D 34363846656 (0x8003eb000) mmap(0x80046a000,1331200,PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC,MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_NOCO= RE|MAP_PREFAULT_READ,3,0x7e000) =3D 34364366848 (0x80046a000) mmap(0x8005af000,36864,PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_PREFA= ULT_READ,3,0x1c2000) =3D 34365698048 (0x8005af000) mmap(0x8005b8000,28672,PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_PREFA= ULT_READ,3,0x1ca000) =3D 34365734912 (0x8005b8000) mmap(0x8005bf000,2265088,PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_ANO= N,-1,0x0) =3D 34365763584 (0x8005bf000) munmap(0x80026e000,4096) =3D 0 (0x0) close(3) =3D 0 (0x0) mprotect(0x80028e000,4096,PROT_READ) =3D 0 (0x0) mprotect(0x8002a2000,4096,PROT_READ) =3D 0 (0x0) mprotect(0x800369000,20480,PROT_READ) =3D 0 (0x0) mprotect(0x800393000,4096,PROT_READ) =3D 0 (0x0) mprotect(0x8003cf000,4096,PROT_READ) =3D 0 (0x0) mprotect(0x8003e8000,4096,PROT_READ) =3D 0 (0x0) mprotect(0x8005af000,36864,PROT_READ) =3D 0 (0x0) mprotect(0x8005af000,36864,PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE) =3D 0 (0x0) mprotect(0x8005af000,36864,PROT_READ) =3D 0 (0x0) readlink("/etc/malloc.conf",0x7fffffffd5c0,1024) ERR#2 'No such file or directory' issetugid() =3D 0 (0x0) __sysctl("vm.overcommit",2,0x7fffffffbb54,0x7fffffffbb48,0x0,0) =3D 0 (0x0) mmap(0x0,2097152,PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANON|MAP_ALIGNED(21),= -1,0x0) =3D 34368126976 (0x800800000) mmap(0x0,2097152,PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANON|MAP_ALIGNED(12),= -1,0x0) =3D 34370224128 (0x800a00000) mmap(0x0,4194304,PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANON|MAP_ALIGNED(21),= -1,0x0) =3D 34372321280 (0x800c00000) __sysctl("kern.usrstack",2,0x8002903c8,0x7fffffffd878,0x0,0) =3D 0 (0x0) getrlimit(RLIMIT_STACK,{ cur=3D536870912,max=3D536870912 }) =3D 0 (0x0) thr_self(0x800a12000) =3D 0 (0x0) mmap(0x7fffdfffe000,4096,PROT_NONE,MAP_ANON,-1,0x0) =3D 140736951476224 (0x7fffdfffe000) rtprio_thread(RTP_LOOKUP,102215,0x7fffffffd838) =3D 0 (0x0) sigaction(SIGTHR,{ 0x8002884d0 SA_SIGINFO ss_t },0x0) =3D 0 (0x0) sigprocmask(SIG_UNBLOCK,{ },0x0) =3D 0 (0x0) _umtx_op(0x7fffffffd830,UMTX_OP_WAKE,0x1,0x0,0x0) =3D 0 (0x0) mprotect(0x0,0,PROT_NONE) =3D 0 (0x0) getpid() =3D 7030 (0x1b76) getpid() =3D 7030 (0x1b76) sigprocmask(SIG_BLOCK,{ SIGHUP|SIGINT|SIGQUIT|SIGILL|SIGTRAP|SIGABRT|SIGEMT|SIGFPE|SIGKILL|SIGBUS|S= IGSEGV|SIGSYS|SIGPIPE|SIGALRM|SIGTERM|SIGURG|SIGSTOP|SIGTSTP|SIGCONT|SIGCHL= D|SIGTTIN|SIGTTOU|SIGIO|SIGXCPU|SIGXFSZ|SIGVTALRM|SIGPROF|SIGWINCH|SIGINFO|= SIGUSR1|SIGUSR2 },{ }) =3D 0 (0x0) sigfastblock(0x3,0x0) =3D 0 (0x0) sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK,{ },0x0) =3D 0 (0x0) sigfastblock(0x1,0x800a12038) =3D 0 (0x0) getcontext(0x7fffffffcbd0) =3D 0 (0x0) sysarch(AMD64_GET_XFPUSTATE,0x7fffffffcb98) =3D 0 (0x0) mmap(0x0,135168,PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANON,-1,0x0) =3D 34376515584 (0x801000000) mprotect(0x22c000,4096,PROT_READ) =3D 0 (0x0) sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK,{ SIGHUP|SIGINT|SIGQUIT|SIGILL|SIGTRAP|SIGABRT|SIGEMT|SIGFPE|SIGKILL|SIGBUS|S= IGSEGV|SIGSYS|SIGPIPE|SIGALRM|SIGTERM|SIGURG|SIGSTOP|SIGTSTP|SIGCONT|SIGCHL= D|SIGTTIN|SIGTTOU|SIGIO|SIGXCPU|SIGXFSZ|SIGVTALRM|SIGPROF|SIGWINCH|SIGINFO|= SIGUSR1|SIGUSR2 },{ }) =3D 0 (0x0) sigaction(SIGTERM,{ 0x800288380 SA_RESTART|SA_SIGINFO ss_t },{ SIG_DFL 0x0 ss_t }) =3D 0 (0x0) sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK,{ },0x0) =3D 0 (0x0) sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK,{ SIGHUP|SIGINT|SIGQUIT|SIGILL|SIGTRAP|SIGABRT|SIGEMT|SIGFPE|SIGKILL|SIGBUS|S= IGSEGV|SIGSYS|SIGPIPE|SIGALRM|SIGTERM|SIGURG|SIGSTOP|SIGTSTP|SIGCONT|SIGCHL= D|SIGTTIN|SIGTTOU|SIGIO|SIGXCPU|SIGXFSZ|SIGVTALRM|SIGPROF|SIGWINCH|SIGINFO|= SIGUSR1|SIGUSR2 },{ }) =3D 0 (0x0) sigaction(SIGINT,{ 0x800288380 SA_RESTART|SA_SIGINFO ss_t },{ SIG_DFL 0x0 ss_t }) =3D 0 (0x0) sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK,{ },0x0) =3D 0 (0x0) sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK,{ SIGHUP|SIGINT|SIGQUIT|SIGILL|SIGTRAP|SIGABRT|SIGEMT|SIGFPE|SIGKILL|SIGBUS|S= IGSEGV|SIGSYS|SIGPIPE|SIGALRM|SIGTERM|SIGURG|SIGSTOP|SIGTSTP|SIGCONT|SIGCHL= D|SIGTTIN|SIGTTOU|SIGIO|SIGXCPU|SIGXFSZ|SIGVTALRM|SIGPROF|SIGWINCH|SIGINFO|= SIGUSR1|SIGUSR2 },{ }) =3D 0 (0x0) sigaction(SIGALRM,{ 0x800288380 SA_SIGINFO ss_t },{ SIG_DFL 0x0 ss_t }) =3D= 0 (0x0) sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK,{ },0x0) =3D 0 (0x0) sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK,{ SIGHUP|SIGINT|SIGQUIT|SIGILL|SIGTRAP|SIGABRT|SIGEMT|SIGFPE|SIGKILL|SIGBUS|S= IGSEGV|SIGSYS|SIGPIPE|SIGALRM|SIGTERM|SIGURG|SIGSTOP|SIGTSTP|SIGCONT|SIGCHL= D|SIGTTIN|SIGTTOU|SIGIO|SIGXCPU|SIGXFSZ|SIGVTALRM|SIGPROF|SIGWINCH|SIGINFO|= SIGUSR1|SIGUSR2 },{ }) =3D 0 (0x0) sigaction(SIGPIPE,{ SIG_IGN SA_RESTART ss_t },{ SIG_DFL 0x0 ss_t }) =3D 0 (0x0) sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK,{ },0x0) =3D 0 (0x0) mmap(0x0,4096,PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANON,-1,0x0) =3D 34362286080 (0x80026e000) mmap(0x0,147456,PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANON,-1,0x0) =3D 34376650752 (0x801021000) mmap(0x7fffdfdfd000,2101248,PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,MAP_STACK,-1,0x0) =3D 140736949374976 (0x7fffdfdfd000) mprotect(0x7fffdfdfd000,4096,PROT_NONE) =3D 0 (0x0) thr_new(0x7fffffffe880,0x68) =3D 0 (0x0) sigfastblock(0x1,0x800a12738) =3D 0 (0x0) _umtx_op(0x800290d80,UMTX_OP_RW_UNLOCK,0x0,0x0,0x0) =3D 0 (0x0) _umtx_op(0x800290d80,UMTX_OP_RW_WRLOCK,0x0,0x0,0x0) =3D 0 (0x0) _umtx_op(0x800290d80,UMTX_OP_RW_UNLOCK,0x0,0x0,0x0) =3D 0 (0x0) _umtx_op(0x800290d80,UMTX_OP_RW_RDLOCK,0x0,0x0,0x0) =3D 0 (0x0) mmap(0x7fffdfbfc000,2101248,PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,MAP_STACK,-1,0x0) =3D 140736947273728 (0x7fffdfbfc000) mprotect(0x7fffdfbfc000,4096,PROT_NONE) =3D 0 (0x0) thr_new(0x7fffffffe880,0x68) =3D 0 (0x0) sigfastblock(0x1,0x800a12e38) =3D 0 (0x0) mmap(0x0,2097152,PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANON|MAP_ALIGNED(21),= -1,0x0) =3D 34378612736 (0x801200000) mmap(0x0,2097152,PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANON|MAP_ALIGNED(21),= -1,0x0) =3D 34380709888 (0x801400000) mmap(0x0,2097152,PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANON|MAP_ALIGNED(12),= -1,0x0) =3D 34382807040 (0x801600000) mmap(0x0,2097152,PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANON|MAP_ALIGNED(12),= -1,0x0) =3D 34384904192 (0x801800000) socket(PF_INET,SOCK_STREAM,0) =3D 3 (0x3) bind(3,{ AF_INET 172.16.70.1:0 },16) =3D 0 (0x0) connect(3,{ AF_INET 172.16.68.1:5001 },16) =3D 0 (0x0) setsockopt(3,SOL_SOCKET,SO_SNDTIMEO,0x7fffdfdfced0,16) =3D 0 (0x0) getsockname(3,{ AF_INET 172.16.70.1:34901 },0x800a1b200) =3D 0 (0x0) getpeername(3,{ AF_INET 172.16.68.1:5001 },0x800a1b178) =3D 0 (0x0) getsockname(3,{ AF_INET 172.16.70.1:34901 },0x7fffdfdfce3c) =3D 0 (0x0) __sysctl("net.routetable.0.0.5.0",6,0x0,0x7fffdfdfcdc8,0x0,0) =3D 0 (0x0) __sysctl("net.routetable.0.0.5.0",6,0x801826000,0x7fffdfdfcdc8,0x0,0) =3D 0 (0x0) _umtx_op(0x80026e008,UMTX_OP_WAKE_PRIVATE,0x7fffffff,0x0,0x0) =3D 0 (0x0) _umtx_op(0x80026e008,UMTX_OP_WAIT_UINT_PRIVATE,0x0,0x18,0x7fffdfffdec8) =3D= 0 (0x0) getpid() =3D 7030 (0x1b76) getsockopt(3,IPPROTO_TCP,TCP_MAXSEG,0x7fffdfdfceb4,0x7fffdfdfceb0) =3D 0 (0= x0) getsockopt(3,SOL_SOCKET,SO_SNDBUF,0x7fffdfdfceb4,0x7fffdfdfceb0) =3D 0 (0x0= ) fstat(1,{ mode=3Dp--------- ,inode=3D12766,size=3D0,blksize=3D4096 }) =3D 0= (0x0) mmap(0x0,2621440,PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANON|MAP_ALIGNED(12),= -1,0x0) =3D 34387001344 (0x801a00000) sendto(3,"@\^A\0x\0\0\0\^A\0\0\^S\M^I\0\0"...,60,MSG_DONTWAIT,NULL,0) =3D 6= 0 (0x3c) getsockopt(3,SOL_SOCKET,SO_SNDBUF,0x7fffdfffde64,0x7fffdfffde60) =3D 0 (0x0= ) setsockopt(3,SOL_SOCKET,SO_SNDTIMEO,0x7fffdfdfced0,16) =3D 0 (0x0) ------------------------------------------------------------ Client connecting to 172.16.68.1, TCP port 5001 TCP window size: 33.2 KByte (default) ------------------------------------------------------------ write(1,"--------------------------------"...,208) =3D 208 (0xd0) [ 1] local 172.16.70.1 port 34901 connected with 172.16.68.1 port 5001 write(1,"[ 1] local 172.16.70.1 port 349"...,72) =3D 72 (0x48) write(3,"@\^A\0x\0\0\0\^A\0\0\^S\M^I\0\0"...,131072) =3D 34000 (0x84d0) write(3,"@\^A\0x\0\0\0\^A\0\0\^S\M^I\0\0"...,131072) ERR#35 'Resource temporarily unavailable' setitimer(0,{ 0.000000, 0.000000 },0x0) =3D 0 (0x0) shutdown(3,SHUT_WR) =3D 0 (0x0) setsockopt(3,SOL_SOCKET,SO_RCVTIMEO,0x7fffdfdfce60,16) =3D 0 (0x0) recvfrom(3,"\0\0\0\^B\0\0\0\^\\0\0\0\0\0\^B"...,131072,0,NULL,0x0) =3D 28 (0x1c) recvfrom(3,0x8018048c0,131072,0,0x0,0x0) ERR#35 'Resource temporarily unavailable' _umtx_op(0x80026e020,UMTX_OP_WAKE_PRIVATE,0x7fffffff,0x0,0x0) =3D 0 (0x0) _umtx_op(0x80026e020,UMTX_OP_WAIT_UINT_PRIVATE,0x0,0x18,0x7fffdfdfcd38) =3D= 0 (0x0) [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth [ 1] 0.00-20.05 sec 33.3 KBytes 13.6 Kbits/sec write(1,"[ ID] Interval Transfer "...,94) =3D 94 (0x5e) _umtx_op(0x80026e020,UMTX_OP_WAKE_PRIVATE,0x7fffffff,0x0,0x0) =3D 0 (0x0) _umtx_op(0x80026e020,UMTX_OP_WAIT_UINT_PRIVATE,0x0,0x18,0x7fffdfdfcd38) =3D= 0 (0x0) close(3) =3D 0 (0x0) _umtx_op(0x800a130c0,UMTX_OP_NWAKE_PRIVATE,0x1,0x0,0x0) =3D 0 (0x0) _umtx_op(0x8002908a8,UMTX_OP_WAIT_UINT_PRIVATE,0x0,0x0,0x0) =3D 0 (0x0) __sysctl("kern.ostype",2,0x80024be6a,0x7fffdfdfb720,0x0,0) =3D 0 (0x0) __sysctl("kern.hostname",2,0x80024bf6a,0x7fffdfdfb720,0x0,0) =3D 0 (0x0) __sysctl("kern.osrelease",2,0x80024c06a,0x7fffdfdfb720,0x0,0) =3D 0 (0x0) __sysctl("kern.version",2,0x80024c16a,0x7fffdfdfb720,0x0,0) =3D 0 (0x0) __sysctl("hw.machine",2,0x80024c26a,0x7fffdfdfb720,0x0,0) =3D 0 (0x0) open("/lib/libgcc_s.so.1",O_RDONLY|O_CLOEXEC|O_VERIFY,00) =3D 3 (0x3) fstat(3,{ mode=3D-r--r--r-- ,inode=3D186687,size=3D93448,blksize=3D32768 })= =3D 0 (0x0) close(3) =3D 0 (0x0) madvise(0x801a00000,1839104,MADV_FREE) =3D 0 (0x0) madvise(0x80184f000,4096,MADV_FREE) =3D 0 (0x0) madvise(0x801851000,36864,MADV_FREE) =3D 0 (0x0) madvise(0x801801000,274432,MADV_FREE) =3D 0 (0x0) _umtx_op(0x80026e008,UMTX_OP_WAIT_UINT_PRIVATE,0x0,0x18,0x7fffdfffdec8) ERR#60 'Operation timed out' _umtx_op(0x800a129c0,UMTX_OP_NWAKE_PRIVATE,0x1,0x0,0x0) =3D 0 (0x0) _umtx_op(0x8002908a8,UMTX_OP_WAIT_UINT_PRIVATE,0x0,0x0,0x0) =3D 0 (0x0) _umtx_op(0x800290d80,UMTX_OP_RW_UNLOCK,0x0,0x0,0x0) =3D 0 (0x0) _umtx_op(0x800290d80,UMTX_OP_RW_WRLOCK,0x0,0x0,0x0) =3D 0 (0x0) _umtx_op(0x800290d80,UMTX_OP_RW_UNLOCK,0x0,0x0,0x0) =3D 0 (0x0) _umtx_op(0x800290d80,UMTX_OP_RW_RDLOCK,0x0,0x0,0x0) =3D 0 (0x0) _umtx_op(0x800290d80,UMTX_OP_RW_UNLOCK,0x0,0x0,0x0) =3D 0 (0x0) _umtx_op(0x800290d80,UMTX_OP_RW_WRLOCK,0x0,0x0,0x0) =3D 0 (0x0) _umtx_op(0x800290d80,UMTX_OP_RW_RDLOCK,0x0,0x0,0x0) =3D 0 (0x0) _umtx_op(0x800290d80,UMTX_OP_RW_UNLOCK,0x0,0x0,0x0) =3D 0 (0x0) _umtx_op(0x800290d80,UMTX_OP_RW_WRLOCK,0x0,0x0,0x0) =3D 0 (0x0) _umtx_op(0x800290d80,UMTX_OP_RW_UNLOCK,0x0,0x0,0x0) =3D 0 (0x0) _umtx_op(0x800290d80,UMTX_OP_RW_RDLOCK,0x0,0x0,0x0) =3D 0 (0x0) _umtx_op(0x800290d80,UMTX_OP_RW_WRLOCK,0x0,0x0,0x0) =3D 0 (0x0) _umtx_op(0x800290d80,UMTX_OP_RW_UNLOCK,0x0,0x0,0x0) =3D 0 (0x0) _umtx_op(0x800290d80,UMTX_OP_RW_RDLOCK,0x0,0x0,0x0) =3D 0 (0x0) _umtx_op(0x800290d80,UMTX_OP_RW_UNLOCK,0x0,0x0,0x0) =3D 0 (0x0) _umtx_op(0x800290d80,UMTX_OP_RW_WRLOCK,0x0,0x0,0x0) =3D 0 (0x0) _umtx_op(0x800290d80,UMTX_OP_RW_RDLOCK,0x0,0x0,0x0) =3D 0 (0x0) exit(0x0) process exit, rval =3D 0 On Sat, May 1, 2021 at 1:26 AM =C3=96zkan KIRIK wro= te: > Here is fresh results; > a bit performance gain achieved. But strangely QAT is better now. > > - with CCR - 2.14 Gbps > PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAN= D > 15 root -16 - 0B 16K CPU7 7 0:11 100.00% [crypt= o > returns 9] > 11 root -92 - 0B 1120K CPU4 4 0:10 98.74% > [intr{irq295: t6nex0:0a0}] > 14 root -16 - 0B 16K CPU11 11 0:09 95.32% [crypt= o > returns 8] > 11 root -92 - 0B 1120K CPU8 8 0:07 63.49% > [intr{irq297: t6nex0:0a2}] > 11 root -92 - 0B 1120K WAIT 12 0:05 42.73% > [intr{irq307: t6nex0:1a2}] > 16 root -16 - 0B 16K CPU15 15 0:04 33.82% [crypt= o > returns 10] > 13 root -16 - 0B 16K RUN 3 0:02 21.78% [crypt= o > returns 7] > 4317 root 22 0 23M 4348K sbwait 14 0:01 7.24% iperf > -B 172.16.70.6 -c 172.16.68.1 -P 2 -t 20{iperf} > 4329 root 23 0 23M 4348K sbwait 14 0:01 7.18% iperf > -B 172.16.70.10 -c 172.16.68.1 -P 2 -t 20{iperf} > ... > 11 root -92 - 0B 1120K WAIT 3 0:00 0.31% > [intr{irq294: t6nex0:evt}] > 0 root -92 - 0B 2144K - 14 0:00 0.30% > [kernel{t6nex0 tq0}] > ... > > > - with QAT - 2.63 Gbps > PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND > 8 root -16 - 0B 16K CPU7 7 0:31 92.05% [crypt= o > returns 5] > 7 root -16 - 0B 16K CPU0 0 0:29 86.03% [crypt= o > returns 4] > 9 root -16 - 0B 16K RUN 15 0:15 43.32% [crypt= o > returns 6] > 11 root -92 - 0B 1664K RUN 4 0:15 43.03% > [intr{irq297: t6nex0:0a2}] > 6 root -16 - 0B 16K crypto 4 0:09 26.01% [crypt= o > returns 3] > 11 root -92 - 0B 1664K WAIT 12 0:07 19.88% > [intr{irq307: t6nex0:1a2}] > 11 root -92 - 0B 1664K WAIT 8 0:02 7.22% > [intr{irq368: qat1}] > 4313 root 22 0 23M 4348K sbwait 2 0:01 6.51% iperf > -B 172.16.70.8 -c 172.16.68.1 -P 2 -t 20{iperf} > 4316 root 22 0 23M 4348K sbwait 3 0:01 6.18% iperf > -B 172.16.70.9 -c 172.16.68.1 -P 2 -t 20{iperf} > ... > 11 root -92 - 0B 1664K WAIT 12 0:02 4.52% > [intr{irq355: qat0}] > ... > 11 root -92 - 0B 1664K WAIT 12 0:01 1.89% > [intr{irq372: qat1}] > 11 root -92 - 0B 1664K WAIT 0 0:00 1.12% > [intr{irq360: qat1}] > 11 root -92 - 0B 1664K WAIT 2 0:00 1.11% > [intr{irq362: qat1}] > 11 root -92 - 0B 1664K WAIT 14 0:00 1.10% > [intr{irq374: qat1}] > 11 root -92 - 0B 1664K WAIT 4 0:00 1.10% > [intr{irq364: qat1}] > 11 root -92 - 0B 1664K WAIT 10 0:00 1.10% > [intr{irq370: qat1}] > 11 root -92 - 0B 1664K WAIT 7 0:00 1.09% > [intr{irq367: qat1}] > 11 root -92 - 0B 1664K WAIT 11 0:00 1.07% > [intr{irq371: qat1}] > 11 root -92 - 0B 1664K WAIT 5 0:00 1.04% > [intr{irq365: qat1}] > 11 root -92 - 0B 1664K WAIT 15 0:00 1.04% > [intr{irq375: qat1}] > 11 root -92 - 0B 1664K WAIT 1 0:00 1.04% > [intr{irq361: qat1}] > 11 root -92 - 0B 1664K WAIT 6 0:00 1.03% > [intr{irq366: qat1}] > > On Sat, May 1, 2021 at 12:45 AM Mark Johnston wrote: > >> On Sat, May 01, 2021 at 12:31:57AM +0300, =C3=96zkan KIRIK wrote: >> > Hello again, >> > >> > patch is applied, now netisr is not eating CPU. but performance drops >> > around 0.2Gbps according to previous kernel. >> > >> > I tried also both net.isr.maxthreads=3D1 and net.isr.maxthreads=3D4 . >> results >> > are same >> > >> > Results are: >> > >> > - with CCR - 1.8Gbps >> > top: >> > PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE C TIME WCPU >> COMMAND >> > 14 root -16 - 0B 16K CPU5 5 1:38 100.00% >> [crypto >> > returns 8] >> > 3 root -16 - 0B 16K CPU1 1 0:58 77.83% >> [crypto >> > returns 0] >> >> Could you also try this patch? It won't help with aesni. >> >> diff --git a/sys/opencrypto/crypto.c b/sys/opencrypto/crypto.c >> index dfd22662e87f..bc23056e86ad 100644 >> --- a/sys/opencrypto/crypto.c >> +++ b/sys/opencrypto/crypto.c >> @@ -94,6 +94,7 @@ struct crypto_session { >> void *softc; >> uint32_t hid; >> uint32_t capabilities; >> + uint64_t id; >> }; >> >> SDT_PROVIDER_DEFINE(opencrypto); >> @@ -572,6 +573,7 @@ crypto_select_driver(const struct cryptoini *cri, in= t >> flags) >> int >> crypto_newsession(crypto_session_t *cses, struct cryptoini *cri, int >> crid) >> { >> + static uint64_t sessid =3D 0; >> crypto_session_t res; >> void *softc_mem; >> struct cryptocap *cap; >> @@ -616,6 +618,7 @@ crypto_newsession(crypto_session_t *cses, struct >> cryptoini *cri, int crid) >> softc_mem =3D malloc(softc_size, M_CRYPTO_DATA, M_WAITOK | M_ZER= O); >> res =3D uma_zalloc(cryptoses_zone, M_WAITOK | M_ZERO); >> res->softc =3D softc_mem; >> + res->id =3D atomic_fetchadd_64(&sessid, 1); >> >> CRYPTO_DRIVER_LOCK(); >> cap =3D crypto_checkdriver(hid); >> @@ -1016,7 +1019,7 @@ crypto_dispatch(struct cryptop *crp) >> binuptime(&crp->crp_tstamp); >> #endif >> >> - crp->crp_retw_id =3D ((uintptr_t)crp->crp_session) % >> crypto_workers_num; >> + crp->crp_retw_id =3D crp->crp_session->id % crypto_workers_num; >> >> if (CRYPTOP_ASYNC(crp)) { >> if (crp->crp_flags & CRYPTO_F_ASYNC_KEEPORDER) { >> > From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sat May 1 13:31:13 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34BA562AE66 for ; Sat, 1 May 2021 13:31:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ozkan.kirik@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vs1-xe2d.google.com (mail-vs1-xe2d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::e2d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FXVW42dvtz4Y7D; Sat, 1 May 2021 13:31:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ozkan.kirik@gmail.com) Received: by mail-vs1-xe2d.google.com with SMTP id d25so662255vsp.1; Sat, 01 May 2021 06:31:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=LTPikQqMW7+QSRz/MpF6pHXrzw63HQYcsZ5aRA8IGFU=; b=aTOJtkXv2G6LIutIwnubnMfWCNvz89g+PLZTc0gPpT8J//HYC2OI5qUFlFj6ers/SD zRzzdIocCc2TMjdWxnqFT0fafvSdz/yWmfqnEMQU0cDsxVStkIwMZCV3HQlS5Z5isq1Z 0Vejv5clrDkxHnx7XdyAAJy4BbiE/wZDJPwNHHZKJEU7Da3tdkvkAOYHulCWvF6IEe34 /YIIi/y+i2B7r2sBl9cpwgitlz0qU+v0GNQX2qI8rK5CzHabvYcgvP9LkNGIOyffIdJs ZjdHW5tbpwiZaZNJFiT5clOxa7xgmqCMRApd77v76TxW/4BlKwM1FVrNCq6iiT3ROQ7S eCqg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=LTPikQqMW7+QSRz/MpF6pHXrzw63HQYcsZ5aRA8IGFU=; b=C4agGEhWONEm+tly4yjIWlj7YlOBrVT3KwvKjMMtD8Qag53ZT+nyer5Lxuxw2mgqYH SVtA9XmC5NEG3Qaa985i9SYWA2Mrmglfi4Q9gyW/bYMrUl4TgRMx39/8YvY4AFqoOiHV UP4BLLG7m5NV4uyOHAmnT4FifB5uv6SLdkzkIRWUULtwoVt5fQIz940HILLRBWqxe5T4 k/9y0sYsWKtjomNweQIL7MraFr5oYm0hpMX0M/rFQl8pwoXVl7CNwns7IPlMcVvYzYyG QAsZ8Kaz8pHjl1dh/xcF2um0PYOPOdi2zOihOXuyqK/XNwPaJEEHVW8Iqcf285NHzHI/ ne2A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532Vgz4zPpDA9wo1/ipSGlfRWbbeqyvGtJLF1iUcr3nHlh2oju9K chz5jRcnC3OEKbp0n1mJWB+tGlZAkVx1UK37DWQuN5Mty6w= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy8/IjDTJk0EMm13JUvXBquW2fhZQxB4ysWGB3p88W7nvn3clbpyRI4RGboorxQMY510cWCjgvhjxtBPydUZzE= X-Received: by 2002:a67:ffd9:: with SMTP id w25mr6804433vsq.8.1619875870797; Sat, 01 May 2021 06:31:10 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: =?UTF-8?B?w5Z6a2FuIEtJUklL?= Date: Sat, 1 May 2021 16:30:59 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: IPsec performace - netisr hits %100 To: Mark Johnston Cc: FreeBSD Net , Navdeep Parhar , John Baldwin X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FXVW42dvtz4Y7D X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=aTOJtkXv; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of ozkankirik@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::e2d as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=ozkankirik@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.37 / 15.00]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36:c]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; R_MIXED_CHARSET(0.62)[subject]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com:dkim]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::e2d:from]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::e2d:from:127.0.2.255]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::e2d:from]; HTTP_TO_IP(1.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-net] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.34 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 May 2021 13:31:13 -0000 This bug is related to CCR. @Navdeep Parhar , @John Baldwi= n if you are interested to fix this bug related with CCR, I can test if you provide patches. Test environment is explained in my first email on this thread. @Mark Johnston Now again on stable/13, - with aesni, without netipsec/ipsec_input.c patch - 1.44Gbps - single netisr thread eats %100 cpu - with qat, without netipsec/ipsec_input.c patch - 1.88Gbps - single netisr thread eats %100 cpu - with aesni, with netipsec/ipsec_input.c patch - 1.33Gbps PID JID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND 7 0 root -16 - 0B 16K CPU4 4 0:39 98.62% [crypto returns 3] 6 0 root -16 - 0B 16K CPU5 5 0:32 84.14% [crypto returns 2] 11 0 root -92 - 0B 1152K CPU8 8 0:28 72.17% [intr{irq97: t6nex0:0a2}] 11 0 root -92 - 0B 1152K CPU3 3 0:20 51.22% [intr{irq107: t6nex0:1a2}] 8 0 root -16 - 0B 16K crypto 7 0:12 30.68% [crypto returns 4] 0 0 root -20 - 0B 13M RUN 7 0:07 21.52% [kernel{crypto_2}] 0 0 root -20 - 0B 13M CPU12 12 0:06 20.53% [kernel{crypto_15}] 0 0 root -20 - 0B 13M CPU9 9 0:05 19.97% [kernel{crypto_0}] 0 0 root -20 - 0B 13M - 0 0:05 19.86% [kernel{crypto_14}] 5 0 root -16 - 0B 16K CPU2 2 0:08 19.75% [crypto returns 1] 0 0 root -20 - 0B 13M - 6 0:05 19.56% [kernel{crypto_9}] 0 0 root -20 - 0B 13M - 7 0:07 18.74% [kernel{crypto_3}] 0 0 root -20 - 0B 13M - 13 0:07 18.68% [kernel{crypto_5}] 0 0 root -20 - 0B 13M CPU1 1 0:07 18.12% [kernel{crypto_11}] 0 0 root -20 - 0B 13M - 2 0:07 17.46% [kernel{crypto_8}] 0 0 root -20 - 0B 13M CPU10 10 0:05 17.31% [kernel{crypto_1}] 0 0 root -20 - 0B 13M - 4 0:06 17.08% [kernel{crypto_7}] 0 0 root -20 - 0B 13M - 14 0:07 16.07% [kernel{crypto_12}] 0 0 root -20 - 0B 13M - 11 0:07 15.39% [kernel{crypto_6}] 0 0 root -20 - 0B 13M - 6 0:07 12.09% [kernel{crypto_4}] - with qat, with netipsec/ipsec_input.c patch - 2.85Gbps - PID JID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND 20 0 root -16 - 0B 16K CPU6 6 0:18 89.69% [crypto returns 13] 19 0 root -16 - 0B 16K CPU4 4 0:17 80.25% [crypto returns 12] 11 0 root -92 - 0B 1696K CPU1 1 0:52 43.90% [intr{irq97: t6nex0:0a2}] 21 0 root -16 - 0B 16K crypto 0 0:09 43.43% [crypto returns 14] 18 0 root -16 - 0B 16K crypto 2 0:05 24.94% [crypto returns 11] 11 0 root -92 - 0B 1696K WAIT 12 0:35 20.18% [intr{irq107: t6nex0:1a2}] 11 0 root -92 - 0B 1696K WAIT 8 0:02 7.44% [intr{irq168: qat1}] 4202 1 root 23 0 32M 4480K sbwait 14 0:01 5.57% iperf -B 172.16.70.5 -c 172.16.68.1 -P 2 -t 30{iperf} 4217 1 root 22 0 32M 4480K sbwait 5 0:01 5.52% iperf -B 172.16.70.10 -c 172.16.68.1 -P 2 -t 30{iperf} ... 11 0 root -92 - 0B 1696K WAIT 12 0:01 4.39% [intr{irq155: qat0}] 4182 0 root 21 0 105M 40M sbwait 4 0:01 4.04% iperf -s{iperf} 4182 0 root 21 0 105M 40M sbwait 5 0:01 3.99% iperf -s{iperf} ... 11 0 root -92 - 0B 1696K WAIT 12 0:00 1.84% [intr{irq172: qat1}] 11 0 root -92 - 0B 1696K WAIT 15 0:00 1.07% [intr{irq175: qat1}] 11 0 root -92 - 0B 1696K WAIT 4 0:00 1.04% [intr{irq164: qat1}] 11 0 root -92 - 0B 1696K CPU6 6 0:00 1.02% [intr{irq166: qat1}] 11 0 root -92 - 0B 1696K WAIT 14 0:00 1.00% [intr{irq174: qat1}] 11 0 root -92 - 0B 1696K WAIT 10 0:00 0.98% [intr{irq170: qat1}] 11 0 root -92 - 0B 1696K WAIT 5 0:00 0.98% [intr{irq165: qat1}] 11 0 root -92 - 0B 1696K WAIT 3 0:00 0.97% [intr{irq163: qat1}] 11 0 root -92 - 0B 1696K WAIT 7 0:00 0.95% [intr{irq167: qat1}] 11 0 root -92 - 0B 1696K WAIT 2 0:00 0.93% [intr{irq162: qat1}] stable/13 results are better then stable/12 but not enough fast. There is something makes bottleneck for IPsec. On Sat, May 1, 2021 at 3:39 PM =C3=96zkan KIRIK wro= te: > I've pulled the latest stable/13 branch and make buildworld. > > Same configuration and same usage, ping works between two sides, iperf ca= n > connect to server but no data transferred. throughput is around 10Kbps. > I tried both with and without netipsec/ipsec_input.c patch, but no change= . > There is something wrong with ipsec (or ipsec in jail) in stable/13. > iperf between host and jail works without ipsec. > > I saw some errors in truss output show as a brief: > write(3,"@\^A\0x\0\0\0\^A\0\0\^S\M^I\0\0"...,131072) ERR#35 'Resource > temporarily unavailable' > recvfrom(3,0x8018048c0,131072,0,0x0,0x0) ERR#35 'Resource temporarily > unavailable' > _umtx_op(0x80026e008,UMTX_OP_WAIT_UINT_PRIVATE,0x0,0x18,0x7fffdfffdec8) > ERR#60 'Operation timed out' > > > Full output of truss output is below: > > root@host # jexec client bash > [root@client /]# truss iperf -B 172.16.70.1 -c 172.16.68.1 2>&1 | grep -v > clock_nanosleep > mmap(0x0,135168,PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANON,-1,0x0) =3D > 34362150912 (0x80024d000) > mprotect(0x80024a000,4096,PROT_READ) =3D 0 (0x0) > issetugid() =3D 0 (0x0) > sigfastblock(0x1,0x80024c510) =3D 0 (0x0) > open("/etc/libmap.conf",O_RDONLY|O_CLOEXEC,011136710) =3D 3 (0x3) > fstat(3,{ mode=3D-rw-r--r-- ,inode=3D482,size=3D47,blksize=3D4096 }) =3D = 0 (0x0) > read(3,"# $FreeBSD$\nincludedir /usr/loc"...,47) =3D 47 (0x2f) > close(3) =3D 0 (0x0) > open("/usr/local/etc/libmap.d",O_RDONLY|O_NONBLOCK|O_DIRECTORY|O_CLOEXEC,= 0165) > ERR#2 'No such file or directory' > open("/var/run/ld-elf.so.hints",O_RDONLY|O_CLOEXEC,010015464) =3D 3 (0x3) > read(3,"Ehnt\^A\0\0\0\M^@\0\0\0\M-U\0\0"...,128) =3D 128 (0x80) > fstat(3,{ mode=3D-r--r--r-- ,inode=3D187,size=3D341,blksize=3D4096 }) =3D= 0 (0x0) > pread(3,"/lib:/usr/lib:/usr/local/lib:/us"...,213,0x80) =3D 213 (0xd5) > close(3) =3D 0 (0x0) > open("/lib/libthr.so.3",O_RDONLY|O_CLOEXEC|O_VERIFY,00) =3D 3 (0x3) > fstat(3,{ mode=3D-r--r--r-- ,inode=3D186701,size=3D125952,blksize=3D32768= }) =3D 0 > (0x0) > mmap(0x0,4096,PROT_READ,MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_PREFAULT_READ,3,0x0) =3D 34362286= 080 > (0x80026e000) > mmap(0x0,184320,PROT_NONE,MAP_GUARD,-1,0x0) =3D 34362290176 (0x80026f000) > mmap(0x80026f000,53248,PROT_READ,MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_NOCORE|MAP_PRE= FAULT_READ,3,0x0) > =3D 34362290176 (0x80026f000) > mmap(0x80027c000,73728,PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC,MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_NOCO= RE|MAP_PREFAULT_READ,3,0xc000) > =3D 34362343424 (0x80027c000) > mmap(0x80028e000,4096,PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_PREF= AULT_READ,3,0x1d000) > =3D 34362417152 (0x80028e000) > mmap(0x80028f000,8192,PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_PREF= AULT_READ,3,0x1d000) > =3D 34362421248 (0x80028f000) > mmap(0x800291000,45056,PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_ANO= N,-1,0x0) > =3D 34362429440 (0x800291000) > munmap(0x80026e000,4096) =3D 0 (0x0) > close(3) =3D 0 (0x0) > open("/lib/librt.so.1",O_RDONLY|O_CLOEXEC|O_VERIFY,066000) ERR#2 'No such > file or directory' > open("/usr/lib/librt.so.1",O_RDONLY|O_CLOEXEC|O_VERIFY,066000) =3D 3 (0x3= ) > fstat(3,{ mode=3D-r--r--r-- ,inode=3D411606,size=3D22824,blksize=3D32768 = }) =3D 0 > (0x0) > mmap(0x0,4096,PROT_READ,MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_PREFAULT_READ,3,0x0) =3D 34362286= 080 > (0x80026e000) > mmap(0x0,36864,PROT_NONE,MAP_GUARD,-1,0x0) =3D 34362474496 (0x80029c000) > mmap(0x80029c000,12288,PROT_READ,MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_NOCORE|MAP_PRE= FAULT_READ,3,0x0) > =3D 34362474496 (0x80029c000) > mmap(0x80029f000,12288,PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC,MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_NOCO= RE|MAP_PREFAULT_READ,3,0x2000) > =3D 34362486784 (0x80029f000) > mmap(0x8002a2000,4096,PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_PREF= AULT_READ,3,0x4000) > =3D 34362499072 (0x8002a2000) > mmap(0x8002a3000,4096,PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_PREF= AULT_READ,3,0x4000) > =3D 34362503168 (0x8002a3000) > mmap(0x8002a4000,4096,PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_ANON= ,-1,0x0) > =3D 34362507264 (0x8002a4000) > munmap(0x80026e000,4096) =3D 0 (0x0) > close(3) =3D 0 (0x0) > open("/lib/libc++.so.1",O_RDONLY|O_CLOEXEC|O_VERIFY,00) ERR#2 'No such > file or directory' > open("/usr/lib/libc++.so.1",O_RDONLY|O_CLOEXEC|O_VERIFY,00) =3D 3 (0x3) > fstat(3,{ mode=3D-r--r--r-- ,inode=3D411469,size=3D824056,blksize=3D32768= }) =3D 0 > (0x0) > mmap(0x0,4096,PROT_READ,MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_PREFAULT_READ,3,0x0) =3D 34362286= 080 > (0x80026e000) > mmap(0x0,860160,PROT_NONE,MAP_GUARD,-1,0x0) =3D 34362511360 (0x8002a5000) > mmap(0x8002a5000,376832,PROT_READ,MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_NOCORE|MAP_PR= EFAULT_READ,3,0x0) > =3D 34362511360 (0x8002a5000) > mmap(0x800301000,425984,PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC,MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_NOC= ORE|MAP_PREFAULT_READ,3,0x5b000) > =3D 34362888192 (0x800301000) > mmap(0x800369000,24576,PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_PRE= FAULT_READ,3,0xc2000) > =3D 34363314176 (0x800369000) > mmap(0x80036f000,8192,PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_PREF= AULT_READ,3,0xc7000) > =3D 34363338752 (0x80036f000) > mmap(0x800371000,24576,PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_ANO= N,-1,0x0) > =3D 34363346944 (0x800371000) > munmap(0x80026e000,4096) =3D 0 (0x0) > close(3) =3D 0 (0x0) > open("/lib/libcxxrt.so.1",O_RDONLY|O_CLOEXEC|O_VERIFY,041400) =3D 3 (0x3) > fstat(3,{ mode=3D-r--r--r-- ,inode=3D186668,size=3D113688,blksize=3D32768= }) =3D 0 > (0x0) > mmap(0x0,4096,PROT_READ,MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_PREFAULT_READ,3,0x0) =3D 34362286= 080 > (0x80026e000) > mmap(0x0,143360,PROT_NONE,MAP_GUARD,-1,0x0) =3D 34363371520 (0x800377000) > mmap(0x800377000,53248,PROT_READ,MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_NOCORE|MAP_PRE= FAULT_READ,3,0x0) > =3D 34363371520 (0x800377000) > mmap(0x800384000,61440,PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC,MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_NOCO= RE|MAP_PREFAULT_READ,3,0xc000) > =3D 34363424768 (0x800384000) > mmap(0x800393000,4096,PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_PREF= AULT_READ,3,0x1a000) > =3D 34363486208 (0x800393000) > mmap(0x800394000,8192,PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_PREF= AULT_READ,3,0x1a000) > =3D 34363490304 (0x800394000) > mmap(0x800396000,16384,PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_ANO= N,-1,0x0) > =3D 34363498496 (0x800396000) > munmap(0x80026e000,4096) =3D 0 (0x0) > close(3) =3D 0 (0x0) > open("/lib/libm.so.5",O_RDONLY|O_CLOEXEC|O_VERIFY,00) =3D 3 (0x3) > fstat(3,{ mode=3D-r--r--r-- ,inode=3D186671,size=3D214192,blksize=3D32768= }) =3D 0 > (0x0) > mmap(0x0,4096,PROT_READ,MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_PREFAULT_READ,3,0x0) =3D 34362286= 080 > (0x80026e000) > mmap(0x0,225280,PROT_NONE,MAP_GUARD,-1,0x0) =3D 34363514880 (0x80039a000) > mmap(0x80039a000,73728,PROT_READ,MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_NOCORE|MAP_PRE= FAULT_READ,3,0x0) > =3D 34363514880 (0x80039a000) > mmap(0x8003ac000,143360,PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC,MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_NOC= ORE|MAP_PREFAULT_READ,3,0x11000) > =3D 34363588608 (0x8003ac000) > mmap(0x8003cf000,4096,PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_PREF= AULT_READ,3,0x33000) > =3D 34363731968 (0x8003cf000) > mmap(0x8003d0000,4096,PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_PREF= AULT_READ,3,0x33000) > =3D 34363736064 (0x8003d0000) > munmap(0x80026e000,4096) =3D 0 (0x0) > close(3) =3D 0 (0x0) > open("/lib/libgcc_s.so.1",O_RDONLY|O_CLOEXEC|O_VERIFY,020643400) =3D 3 (0= x3) > fstat(3,{ mode=3D-r--r--r-- ,inode=3D186687,size=3D93448,blksize=3D32768 = }) =3D 0 > (0x0) > mmap(0x0,4096,PROT_READ,MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_PREFAULT_READ,3,0x0) =3D 34362286= 080 > (0x80026e000) > mmap(0x0,106496,PROT_NONE,MAP_GUARD,-1,0x0) =3D 34363740160 (0x8003d1000) > mmap(0x8003d1000,36864,PROT_READ,MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_NOCORE|MAP_PRE= FAULT_READ,3,0x0) > =3D 34363740160 (0x8003d1000) > mmap(0x8003da000,57344,PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC,MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_NOCO= RE|MAP_PREFAULT_READ,3,0x8000) > =3D 34363777024 (0x8003da000) > mmap(0x8003e8000,8192,PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_PREF= AULT_READ,3,0x15000) > =3D 34363834368 (0x8003e8000) > mmap(0x8003ea000,4096,PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_PREF= AULT_READ,3,0x16000) > =3D 34363842560 (0x8003ea000) > munmap(0x80026e000,4096) =3D 0 (0x0) > close(3) =3D 0 (0x0) > open("/lib/libc.so.7",O_RDONLY|O_CLOEXEC|O_VERIFY,00) =3D 3 (0x3) > fstat(3,{ mode=3D-r--r--r-- ,inode=3D186667,size=3D1904424,blksize=3D3276= 8 }) =3D 0 > (0x0) > mmap(0x0,4096,PROT_READ,MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_PREFAULT_READ,3,0x0) =3D 34362286= 080 > (0x80026e000) > mmap(0x0,4182016,PROT_NONE,MAP_GUARD,-1,0x0) =3D 34363846656 (0x8003eb000= ) > mmap(0x8003eb000,520192,PROT_READ,MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_NOCORE|MAP_PR= EFAULT_READ,3,0x0) > =3D 34363846656 (0x8003eb000) > mmap(0x80046a000,1331200,PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC,MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_NO= CORE|MAP_PREFAULT_READ,3,0x7e000) > =3D 34364366848 (0x80046a000) > mmap(0x8005af000,36864,PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_PRE= FAULT_READ,3,0x1c2000) > =3D 34365698048 (0x8005af000) > mmap(0x8005b8000,28672,PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_PRE= FAULT_READ,3,0x1ca000) > =3D 34365734912 (0x8005b8000) > mmap(0x8005bf000,2265088,PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_A= NON,-1,0x0) > =3D 34365763584 (0x8005bf000) > munmap(0x80026e000,4096) =3D 0 (0x0) > close(3) =3D 0 (0x0) > mprotect(0x80028e000,4096,PROT_READ) =3D 0 (0x0) > mprotect(0x8002a2000,4096,PROT_READ) =3D 0 (0x0) > mprotect(0x800369000,20480,PROT_READ) =3D 0 (0x0) > mprotect(0x800393000,4096,PROT_READ) =3D 0 (0x0) > mprotect(0x8003cf000,4096,PROT_READ) =3D 0 (0x0) > mprotect(0x8003e8000,4096,PROT_READ) =3D 0 (0x0) > mprotect(0x8005af000,36864,PROT_READ) =3D 0 (0x0) > mprotect(0x8005af000,36864,PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE) =3D 0 (0x0) > mprotect(0x8005af000,36864,PROT_READ) =3D 0 (0x0) > readlink("/etc/malloc.conf",0x7fffffffd5c0,1024) ERR#2 'No such file or > directory' > issetugid() =3D 0 (0x0) > __sysctl("vm.overcommit",2,0x7fffffffbb54,0x7fffffffbb48,0x0,0) =3D 0 (0x= 0) > mmap(0x0,2097152,PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANON|MAP_ALIGNED(21= ),-1,0x0) > =3D 34368126976 (0x800800000) > mmap(0x0,2097152,PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANON|MAP_ALIGNED(12= ),-1,0x0) > =3D 34370224128 (0x800a00000) > mmap(0x0,4194304,PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANON|MAP_ALIGNED(21= ),-1,0x0) > =3D 34372321280 (0x800c00000) > __sysctl("kern.usrstack",2,0x8002903c8,0x7fffffffd878,0x0,0) =3D 0 (0x0) > getrlimit(RLIMIT_STACK,{ cur=3D536870912,max=3D536870912 }) =3D 0 (0x0) > thr_self(0x800a12000) =3D 0 (0x0) > mmap(0x7fffdfffe000,4096,PROT_NONE,MAP_ANON,-1,0x0) =3D 140736951476224 > (0x7fffdfffe000) > rtprio_thread(RTP_LOOKUP,102215,0x7fffffffd838) =3D 0 (0x0) > sigaction(SIGTHR,{ 0x8002884d0 SA_SIGINFO ss_t },0x0) =3D 0 (0x0) > sigprocmask(SIG_UNBLOCK,{ },0x0) =3D 0 (0x0) > _umtx_op(0x7fffffffd830,UMTX_OP_WAKE,0x1,0x0,0x0) =3D 0 (0x0) > mprotect(0x0,0,PROT_NONE) =3D 0 (0x0) > getpid() =3D 7030 (0x1b76) > getpid() =3D 7030 (0x1b76) > sigprocmask(SIG_BLOCK,{ > SIGHUP|SIGINT|SIGQUIT|SIGILL|SIGTRAP|SIGABRT|SIGEMT|SIGFPE|SIGKILL|SIGBUS= |SIGSEGV|SIGSYS|SIGPIPE|SIGALRM|SIGTERM|SIGURG|SIGSTOP|SIGTSTP|SIGCONT|SIGC= HLD|SIGTTIN|SIGTTOU|SIGIO|SIGXCPU|SIGXFSZ|SIGVTALRM|SIGPROF|SIGWINCH|SIGINF= O|SIGUSR1|SIGUSR2 > },{ }) =3D 0 (0x0) > sigfastblock(0x3,0x0) =3D 0 (0x0) > sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK,{ },0x0) =3D 0 (0x0) > sigfastblock(0x1,0x800a12038) =3D 0 (0x0) > getcontext(0x7fffffffcbd0) =3D 0 (0x0) > sysarch(AMD64_GET_XFPUSTATE,0x7fffffffcb98) =3D 0 (0x0) > mmap(0x0,135168,PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANON,-1,0x0) =3D > 34376515584 (0x801000000) > mprotect(0x22c000,4096,PROT_READ) =3D 0 (0x0) > sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK,{ > SIGHUP|SIGINT|SIGQUIT|SIGILL|SIGTRAP|SIGABRT|SIGEMT|SIGFPE|SIGKILL|SIGBUS= |SIGSEGV|SIGSYS|SIGPIPE|SIGALRM|SIGTERM|SIGURG|SIGSTOP|SIGTSTP|SIGCONT|SIGC= HLD|SIGTTIN|SIGTTOU|SIGIO|SIGXCPU|SIGXFSZ|SIGVTALRM|SIGPROF|SIGWINCH|SIGINF= O|SIGUSR1|SIGUSR2 > },{ }) =3D 0 (0x0) > sigaction(SIGTERM,{ 0x800288380 SA_RESTART|SA_SIGINFO ss_t },{ SIG_DFL 0x= 0 > ss_t }) =3D 0 (0x0) > sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK,{ },0x0) =3D 0 (0x0) > sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK,{ > SIGHUP|SIGINT|SIGQUIT|SIGILL|SIGTRAP|SIGABRT|SIGEMT|SIGFPE|SIGKILL|SIGBUS= |SIGSEGV|SIGSYS|SIGPIPE|SIGALRM|SIGTERM|SIGURG|SIGSTOP|SIGTSTP|SIGCONT|SIGC= HLD|SIGTTIN|SIGTTOU|SIGIO|SIGXCPU|SIGXFSZ|SIGVTALRM|SIGPROF|SIGWINCH|SIGINF= O|SIGUSR1|SIGUSR2 > },{ }) =3D 0 (0x0) > sigaction(SIGINT,{ 0x800288380 SA_RESTART|SA_SIGINFO ss_t },{ SIG_DFL 0x0 > ss_t }) =3D 0 (0x0) > sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK,{ },0x0) =3D 0 (0x0) > sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK,{ > SIGHUP|SIGINT|SIGQUIT|SIGILL|SIGTRAP|SIGABRT|SIGEMT|SIGFPE|SIGKILL|SIGBUS= |SIGSEGV|SIGSYS|SIGPIPE|SIGALRM|SIGTERM|SIGURG|SIGSTOP|SIGTSTP|SIGCONT|SIGC= HLD|SIGTTIN|SIGTTOU|SIGIO|SIGXCPU|SIGXFSZ|SIGVTALRM|SIGPROF|SIGWINCH|SIGINF= O|SIGUSR1|SIGUSR2 > },{ }) =3D 0 (0x0) > sigaction(SIGALRM,{ 0x800288380 SA_SIGINFO ss_t },{ SIG_DFL 0x0 ss_t }) = =3D > 0 (0x0) > sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK,{ },0x0) =3D 0 (0x0) > sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK,{ > SIGHUP|SIGINT|SIGQUIT|SIGILL|SIGTRAP|SIGABRT|SIGEMT|SIGFPE|SIGKILL|SIGBUS= |SIGSEGV|SIGSYS|SIGPIPE|SIGALRM|SIGTERM|SIGURG|SIGSTOP|SIGTSTP|SIGCONT|SIGC= HLD|SIGTTIN|SIGTTOU|SIGIO|SIGXCPU|SIGXFSZ|SIGVTALRM|SIGPROF|SIGWINCH|SIGINF= O|SIGUSR1|SIGUSR2 > },{ }) =3D 0 (0x0) > sigaction(SIGPIPE,{ SIG_IGN SA_RESTART ss_t },{ SIG_DFL 0x0 ss_t }) =3D 0 > (0x0) > sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK,{ },0x0) =3D 0 (0x0) > mmap(0x0,4096,PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANON,-1,0x0) =3D > 34362286080 (0x80026e000) > mmap(0x0,147456,PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANON,-1,0x0) =3D > 34376650752 (0x801021000) > mmap(0x7fffdfdfd000,2101248,PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,MAP_STACK,-1,0x0) =3D > 140736949374976 (0x7fffdfdfd000) > mprotect(0x7fffdfdfd000,4096,PROT_NONE) =3D 0 (0x0) > thr_new(0x7fffffffe880,0x68) =3D 0 (0x0) > > sigfastblock(0x1,0x800a12738) =3D 0 (0x0) > _umtx_op(0x800290d80,UMTX_OP_RW_UNLOCK,0x0,0x0,0x0) =3D 0 (0x0) > _umtx_op(0x800290d80,UMTX_OP_RW_WRLOCK,0x0,0x0,0x0) =3D 0 (0x0) > _umtx_op(0x800290d80,UMTX_OP_RW_UNLOCK,0x0,0x0,0x0) =3D 0 (0x0) > _umtx_op(0x800290d80,UMTX_OP_RW_RDLOCK,0x0,0x0,0x0) =3D 0 (0x0) > mmap(0x7fffdfbfc000,2101248,PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,MAP_STACK,-1,0x0) =3D > 140736947273728 (0x7fffdfbfc000) > mprotect(0x7fffdfbfc000,4096,PROT_NONE) =3D 0 (0x0) > thr_new(0x7fffffffe880,0x68) =3D 0 (0x0) > > sigfastblock(0x1,0x800a12e38) =3D 0 (0x0) > mmap(0x0,2097152,PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANON|MAP_ALIGNED(21= ),-1,0x0) > =3D 34378612736 (0x801200000) > mmap(0x0,2097152,PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANON|MAP_ALIGNED(21= ),-1,0x0) > =3D 34380709888 (0x801400000) > mmap(0x0,2097152,PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANON|MAP_ALIGNED(12= ),-1,0x0) > =3D 34382807040 (0x801600000) > mmap(0x0,2097152,PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANON|MAP_ALIGNED(12= ),-1,0x0) > =3D 34384904192 (0x801800000) > socket(PF_INET,SOCK_STREAM,0) =3D 3 (0x3) > bind(3,{ AF_INET 172.16.70.1:0 },16) =3D 0 (0x0) > connect(3,{ AF_INET 172.16.68.1:5001 },16) =3D 0 (0x0) > setsockopt(3,SOL_SOCKET,SO_SNDTIMEO,0x7fffdfdfced0,16) =3D 0 (0x0) > getsockname(3,{ AF_INET 172.16.70.1:34901 },0x800a1b200) =3D 0 (0x0) > getpeername(3,{ AF_INET 172.16.68.1:5001 },0x800a1b178) =3D 0 (0x0) > getsockname(3,{ AF_INET 172.16.70.1:34901 },0x7fffdfdfce3c) =3D 0 (0x0) > __sysctl("net.routetable.0.0.5.0",6,0x0,0x7fffdfdfcdc8,0x0,0) =3D 0 (0x0) > __sysctl("net.routetable.0.0.5.0",6,0x801826000,0x7fffdfdfcdc8,0x0,0) =3D= 0 > (0x0) > _umtx_op(0x80026e008,UMTX_OP_WAKE_PRIVATE,0x7fffffff,0x0,0x0) =3D 0 (0x0) > _umtx_op(0x80026e008,UMTX_OP_WAIT_UINT_PRIVATE,0x0,0x18,0x7fffdfffdec8) = =3D > 0 (0x0) > getpid() =3D 7030 (0x1b76) > getsockopt(3,IPPROTO_TCP,TCP_MAXSEG,0x7fffdfdfceb4,0x7fffdfdfceb0) =3D 0 > (0x0) > getsockopt(3,SOL_SOCKET,SO_SNDBUF,0x7fffdfdfceb4,0x7fffdfdfceb0) =3D 0 (0= x0) > fstat(1,{ mode=3Dp--------- ,inode=3D12766,size=3D0,blksize=3D4096 }) =3D= 0 (0x0) > mmap(0x0,2621440,PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANON|MAP_ALIGNED(12= ),-1,0x0) > =3D 34387001344 (0x801a00000) > sendto(3,"@\^A\0x\0\0\0\^A\0\0\^S\M^I\0\0"...,60,MSG_DONTWAIT,NULL,0) =3D= 60 > (0x3c) > getsockopt(3,SOL_SOCKET,SO_SNDBUF,0x7fffdfffde64,0x7fffdfffde60) =3D 0 (0= x0) > setsockopt(3,SOL_SOCKET,SO_SNDTIMEO,0x7fffdfdfced0,16) =3D 0 (0x0) > ------------------------------------------------------------ > Client connecting to 172.16.68.1, TCP port 5001 > TCP window size: 33.2 KByte (default) > ------------------------------------------------------------ > write(1,"--------------------------------"...,208) =3D 208 (0xd0) > [ 1] local 172.16.70.1 port 34901 connected with 172.16.68.1 port 5001 > write(1,"[ 1] local 172.16.70.1 port 349"...,72) =3D 72 (0x48) > write(3,"@\^A\0x\0\0\0\^A\0\0\^S\M^I\0\0"...,131072) =3D 34000 (0x84d0) > write(3,"@\^A\0x\0\0\0\^A\0\0\^S\M^I\0\0"...,131072) ERR#35 'Resource > temporarily unavailable' > setitimer(0,{ 0.000000, 0.000000 },0x0) =3D 0 (0x0) > shutdown(3,SHUT_WR) =3D 0 (0x0) > setsockopt(3,SOL_SOCKET,SO_RCVTIMEO,0x7fffdfdfce60,16) =3D 0 (0x0) > recvfrom(3,"\0\0\0\^B\0\0\0\^\\0\0\0\0\0\^B"...,131072,0,NULL,0x0) =3D 28 > (0x1c) > recvfrom(3,0x8018048c0,131072,0,0x0,0x0) ERR#35 'Resource temporarily > unavailable' > _umtx_op(0x80026e020,UMTX_OP_WAKE_PRIVATE,0x7fffffff,0x0,0x0) =3D 0 (0x0) > _umtx_op(0x80026e020,UMTX_OP_WAIT_UINT_PRIVATE,0x0,0x18,0x7fffdfdfcd38) = =3D > 0 (0x0) > [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth > [ 1] 0.00-20.05 sec 33.3 KBytes 13.6 Kbits/sec > write(1,"[ ID] Interval Transfer "...,94) =3D 94 (0x5e) > _umtx_op(0x80026e020,UMTX_OP_WAKE_PRIVATE,0x7fffffff,0x0,0x0) =3D 0 (0x0) > _umtx_op(0x80026e020,UMTX_OP_WAIT_UINT_PRIVATE,0x0,0x18,0x7fffdfdfcd38) = =3D > 0 (0x0) > close(3) =3D 0 (0x0) > _umtx_op(0x800a130c0,UMTX_OP_NWAKE_PRIVATE,0x1,0x0,0x0) =3D 0 (0x0) > _umtx_op(0x8002908a8,UMTX_OP_WAIT_UINT_PRIVATE,0x0,0x0,0x0) =3D 0 (0x0) > __sysctl("kern.ostype",2,0x80024be6a,0x7fffdfdfb720,0x0,0) =3D 0 (0x0) > __sysctl("kern.hostname",2,0x80024bf6a,0x7fffdfdfb720,0x0,0) =3D 0 (0x0) > __sysctl("kern.osrelease",2,0x80024c06a,0x7fffdfdfb720,0x0,0) =3D 0 (0x0) > __sysctl("kern.version",2,0x80024c16a,0x7fffdfdfb720,0x0,0) =3D 0 (0x0) > __sysctl("hw.machine",2,0x80024c26a,0x7fffdfdfb720,0x0,0) =3D 0 (0x0) > open("/lib/libgcc_s.so.1",O_RDONLY|O_CLOEXEC|O_VERIFY,00) =3D 3 (0x3) > fstat(3,{ mode=3D-r--r--r-- ,inode=3D186687,size=3D93448,blksize=3D32768 = }) =3D 0 > (0x0) > close(3) =3D 0 (0x0) > madvise(0x801a00000,1839104,MADV_FREE) =3D 0 (0x0) > madvise(0x80184f000,4096,MADV_FREE) =3D 0 (0x0) > madvise(0x801851000,36864,MADV_FREE) =3D 0 (0x0) > madvise(0x801801000,274432,MADV_FREE) =3D 0 (0x0) > > _umtx_op(0x80026e008,UMTX_OP_WAIT_UINT_PRIVATE,0x0,0x18,0x7fffdfffdec8) > ERR#60 'Operation timed out' > _umtx_op(0x800a129c0,UMTX_OP_NWAKE_PRIVATE,0x1,0x0,0x0) =3D 0 (0x0) > _umtx_op(0x8002908a8,UMTX_OP_WAIT_UINT_PRIVATE,0x0,0x0,0x0) =3D 0 (0x0) > _umtx_op(0x800290d80,UMTX_OP_RW_UNLOCK,0x0,0x0,0x0) =3D 0 (0x0) > _umtx_op(0x800290d80,UMTX_OP_RW_WRLOCK,0x0,0x0,0x0) =3D 0 (0x0) > _umtx_op(0x800290d80,UMTX_OP_RW_UNLOCK,0x0,0x0,0x0) =3D 0 (0x0) > _umtx_op(0x800290d80,UMTX_OP_RW_RDLOCK,0x0,0x0,0x0) =3D 0 (0x0) > _umtx_op(0x800290d80,UMTX_OP_RW_UNLOCK,0x0,0x0,0x0) =3D 0 (0x0) > _umtx_op(0x800290d80,UMTX_OP_RW_WRLOCK,0x0,0x0,0x0) =3D 0 (0x0) > _umtx_op(0x800290d80,UMTX_OP_RW_RDLOCK,0x0,0x0,0x0) =3D 0 (0x0) > _umtx_op(0x800290d80,UMTX_OP_RW_UNLOCK,0x0,0x0,0x0) =3D 0 (0x0) > _umtx_op(0x800290d80,UMTX_OP_RW_WRLOCK,0x0,0x0,0x0) =3D 0 (0x0) > _umtx_op(0x800290d80,UMTX_OP_RW_UNLOCK,0x0,0x0,0x0) =3D 0 (0x0) > _umtx_op(0x800290d80,UMTX_OP_RW_RDLOCK,0x0,0x0,0x0) =3D 0 (0x0) > _umtx_op(0x800290d80,UMTX_OP_RW_WRLOCK,0x0,0x0,0x0) =3D 0 (0x0) > _umtx_op(0x800290d80,UMTX_OP_RW_UNLOCK,0x0,0x0,0x0) =3D 0 (0x0) > _umtx_op(0x800290d80,UMTX_OP_RW_RDLOCK,0x0,0x0,0x0) =3D 0 (0x0) > _umtx_op(0x800290d80,UMTX_OP_RW_UNLOCK,0x0,0x0,0x0) =3D 0 (0x0) > _umtx_op(0x800290d80,UMTX_OP_RW_WRLOCK,0x0,0x0,0x0) =3D 0 (0x0) > _umtx_op(0x800290d80,UMTX_OP_RW_RDLOCK,0x0,0x0,0x0) =3D 0 (0x0) > > exit(0x0) > process exit, rval =3D 0 > > On Sat, May 1, 2021 at 1:26 AM =C3=96zkan KIRIK w= rote: > >> Here is fresh results; >> a bit performance gain achieved. But strangely QAT is better now. >> >> - with CCR - 2.14 Gbps >> PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMA= ND >> 15 root -16 - 0B 16K CPU7 7 0:11 100.00% >> [crypto returns 9] >> 11 root -92 - 0B 1120K CPU4 4 0:10 98.74% >> [intr{irq295: t6nex0:0a0}] >> 14 root -16 - 0B 16K CPU11 11 0:09 95.32% >> [crypto returns 8] >> 11 root -92 - 0B 1120K CPU8 8 0:07 63.49% >> [intr{irq297: t6nex0:0a2}] >> 11 root -92 - 0B 1120K WAIT 12 0:05 42.73% >> [intr{irq307: t6nex0:1a2}] >> 16 root -16 - 0B 16K CPU15 15 0:04 33.82% >> [crypto returns 10] >> 13 root -16 - 0B 16K RUN 3 0:02 21.78% >> [crypto returns 7] >> 4317 root 22 0 23M 4348K sbwait 14 0:01 7.24% iperf >> -B 172.16.70.6 -c 172.16.68.1 -P 2 -t 20{iperf} >> 4329 root 23 0 23M 4348K sbwait 14 0:01 7.18% iperf >> -B 172.16.70.10 -c 172.16.68.1 -P 2 -t 20{iperf} >> ... >> 11 root -92 - 0B 1120K WAIT 3 0:00 0.31% >> [intr{irq294: t6nex0:evt}] >> 0 root -92 - 0B 2144K - 14 0:00 0.30% >> [kernel{t6nex0 tq0}] >> ... >> >> >> - with QAT - 2.63 Gbps >> PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAN= D >> 8 root -16 - 0B 16K CPU7 7 0:31 92.05% >> [crypto returns 5] >> 7 root -16 - 0B 16K CPU0 0 0:29 86.03% >> [crypto returns 4] >> 9 root -16 - 0B 16K RUN 15 0:15 43.32% >> [crypto returns 6] >> 11 root -92 - 0B 1664K RUN 4 0:15 43.03% >> [intr{irq297: t6nex0:0a2}] >> 6 root -16 - 0B 16K crypto 4 0:09 26.01% >> [crypto returns 3] >> 11 root -92 - 0B 1664K WAIT 12 0:07 19.88% >> [intr{irq307: t6nex0:1a2}] >> 11 root -92 - 0B 1664K WAIT 8 0:02 7.22% >> [intr{irq368: qat1}] >> 4313 root 22 0 23M 4348K sbwait 2 0:01 6.51% iperf >> -B 172.16.70.8 -c 172.16.68.1 -P 2 -t 20{iperf} >> 4316 root 22 0 23M 4348K sbwait 3 0:01 6.18% iperf >> -B 172.16.70.9 -c 172.16.68.1 -P 2 -t 20{iperf} >> ... >> 11 root -92 - 0B 1664K WAIT 12 0:02 4.52% >> [intr{irq355: qat0}] >> ... >> 11 root -92 - 0B 1664K WAIT 12 0:01 1.89% >> [intr{irq372: qat1}] >> 11 root -92 - 0B 1664K WAIT 0 0:00 1.12% >> [intr{irq360: qat1}] >> 11 root -92 - 0B 1664K WAIT 2 0:00 1.11% >> [intr{irq362: qat1}] >> 11 root -92 - 0B 1664K WAIT 14 0:00 1.10% >> [intr{irq374: qat1}] >> 11 root -92 - 0B 1664K WAIT 4 0:00 1.10% >> [intr{irq364: qat1}] >> 11 root -92 - 0B 1664K WAIT 10 0:00 1.10% >> [intr{irq370: qat1}] >> 11 root -92 - 0B 1664K WAIT 7 0:00 1.09% >> [intr{irq367: qat1}] >> 11 root -92 - 0B 1664K WAIT 11 0:00 1.07% >> [intr{irq371: qat1}] >> 11 root -92 - 0B 1664K WAIT 5 0:00 1.04% >> [intr{irq365: qat1}] >> 11 root -92 - 0B 1664K WAIT 15 0:00 1.04% >> [intr{irq375: qat1}] >> 11 root -92 - 0B 1664K WAIT 1 0:00 1.04% >> [intr{irq361: qat1}] >> 11 root -92 - 0B 1664K WAIT 6 0:00 1.03% >> [intr{irq366: qat1}] >> >> On Sat, May 1, 2021 at 12:45 AM Mark Johnston wrote: >> >>> On Sat, May 01, 2021 at 12:31:57AM +0300, =C3=96zkan KIRIK wrote: >>> > Hello again, >>> > >>> > patch is applied, now netisr is not eating CPU. but performance drops >>> > around 0.2Gbps according to previous kernel. >>> > >>> > I tried also both net.isr.maxthreads=3D1 and net.isr.maxthreads=3D4 . >>> results >>> > are same >>> > >>> > Results are: >>> > >>> > - with CCR - 1.8Gbps >>> > top: >>> > PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE C TIME WCPU >>> COMMAND >>> > 14 root -16 - 0B 16K CPU5 5 1:38 100.00% >>> [crypto >>> > returns 8] >>> > 3 root -16 - 0B 16K CPU1 1 0:58 77.83% >>> [crypto >>> > returns 0] >>> >>> Could you also try this patch? It won't help with aesni. >>> >>> diff --git a/sys/opencrypto/crypto.c b/sys/opencrypto/crypto.c >>> index dfd22662e87f..bc23056e86ad 100644 >>> --- a/sys/opencrypto/crypto.c >>> +++ b/sys/opencrypto/crypto.c >>> @@ -94,6 +94,7 @@ struct crypto_session { >>> void *softc; >>> uint32_t hid; >>> uint32_t capabilities; >>> + uint64_t id; >>> }; >>> >>> SDT_PROVIDER_DEFINE(opencrypto); >>> @@ -572,6 +573,7 @@ crypto_select_driver(const struct cryptoini *cri, >>> int flags) >>> int >>> crypto_newsession(crypto_session_t *cses, struct cryptoini *cri, int >>> crid) >>> { >>> + static uint64_t sessid =3D 0; >>> crypto_session_t res; >>> void *softc_mem; >>> struct cryptocap *cap; >>> @@ -616,6 +618,7 @@ crypto_newsession(crypto_session_t *cses, struct >>> cryptoini *cri, int crid) >>> softc_mem =3D malloc(softc_size, M_CRYPTO_DATA, M_WAITOK | M_ZE= RO); >>> res =3D uma_zalloc(cryptoses_zone, M_WAITOK | M_ZERO); >>> res->softc =3D softc_mem; >>> + res->id =3D atomic_fetchadd_64(&sessid, 1); >>> >>> CRYPTO_DRIVER_LOCK(); >>> cap =3D crypto_checkdriver(hid); >>> @@ -1016,7 +1019,7 @@ crypto_dispatch(struct cryptop *crp) >>> binuptime(&crp->crp_tstamp); >>> #endif >>> >>> - crp->crp_retw_id =3D ((uintptr_t)crp->crp_session) % >>> crypto_workers_num; >>> + crp->crp_retw_id =3D crp->crp_session->id % crypto_workers_num; >>> >>> if (CRYPTOP_ASYNC(crp)) { >>> if (crp->crp_flags & CRYPTO_F_ASYNC_KEEPORDER) { >>> >> From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sat May 1 14:51:22 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19F9662E387 for ; Sat, 1 May 2021 14:51:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from markjdb@gmail.com) Received: from mail-io1-xd2b.google.com (mail-io1-xd2b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2b]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FXXHY4Xpnz4cbJ; Sat, 1 May 2021 14:51:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from markjdb@gmail.com) Received: by mail-io1-xd2b.google.com with SMTP id s4so677006ioc.3; Sat, 01 May 2021 07:51:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to; bh=3yrjNTRPnxOaVsIcqd0u1EDEAK5BUTAgqnhfDXf7gaE=; b=GT8O0+ZO9wr6xiswq8j49V6A54bmvqIoBQeLBbtMFSUMMPLFMFgX7tUvgOl2LkA58+ xXITRasQQcHzxpcyesn7EcuNm8m0bCOH9F1FcG8HSmVTgiVDX+9AvYX2qudbt1demLP2 WhUrlYFl1cfQXBu4ubEx8ekCnKPPTJbIW/D0GBOJZL1UzA6E6ttRZDMmogRa/N48sDgJ GIIEes0imb4aAjNNjWdrF8/N7HtfOhIh349xWuYvX4mm9kwUw4moxwl8ngvv6J8b5kWV Lk5a5+xIVArqaslzR4NcbQI288zwvW9IcQnad0jgue5G4K1SblbqYwhU5i7KLRmaCLYw 3X1g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-disposition :content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to; bh=3yrjNTRPnxOaVsIcqd0u1EDEAK5BUTAgqnhfDXf7gaE=; b=F5PMBf7PeDotoy+T20KYlDOFB+gVowW7DwB8o6spOTecFcR7r9w/AwlsPXxiYO/5Mu 8u1QHgYpgFXanGLn9wx9iw5Ag6YNcrBNk3GJVTj/JcHeaGFTqC9iuN2DW5y2B8WEDueX O7Ln8EKYVCvfbSstpfsWuE49LwRt5Ji3Ozg6WyF1ftkq32gV9Dc14RGB/6zJBQWEEQsC qmc8oYxNYNtb6wx5qujiaURt1ox1Rrs2KNsgOigN7rHVCI8LOncUmNYeEyf9kVOWll5z dtozZgdjpMC7HNau2uV79a5+MONJrymK67bahl0VrOTDgRVmelqMK5KXR5W+XT1RYiQQ eO7Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531jBxIbe4sojCiGz1aDJ3B/mnf7HkSBZ9dwHdR8GHBsvViqQRhn 9uZzgCnaqMc/frr4MTtUPDY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy4j78747Lvw+LJJ1DlsLjlU0pXze4/9MqMwyjkHpgSd05lYH/LDuJuB+X6JqoVU0XRRJoXwA== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:8f88:: with SMTP id l8mr8018590iol.94.1619880680473; Sat, 01 May 2021 07:51:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nuc ([142.126.164.150]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h4sm2506309ili.52.2021.05.01.07.51.19 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 01 May 2021 07:51:19 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Mark Johnston Date: Sat, 1 May 2021 10:51:20 -0400 From: Mark Johnston To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?=D6zkan?= KIRIK Cc: FreeBSD Net , Navdeep Parhar , John Baldwin Subject: Re: IPsec performace - netisr hits %100 Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FXXHY4Xpnz4cbJ X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=GT8O0+ZO; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of markjdb@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2b as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=markjdb@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.67 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36:c]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[gmail.com]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[markj@freebsd.org,markjdb@gmail.com]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[markj@freebsd.org,markjdb@gmail.com]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2b:from]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.97)[-0.975]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[freebsd.org]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2b:from:127.0.2.255]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2b:from]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-net] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 May 2021 14:51:22 -0000 On Sat, May 01, 2021 at 04:30:59PM +0300, Özkan KIRIK wrote: > This bug is related to CCR. @Navdeep Parhar , @John Baldwin > if you are interested to fix this bug related with CCR, I > can test if you provide patches. Test environment is explained in my first > email on this thread. > > @Mark Johnston Now again on stable/13, > - with aesni, without netipsec/ipsec_input.c patch - 1.44Gbps - single > netisr thread eats %100 cpu > - with qat, without netipsec/ipsec_input.c patch - 1.88Gbps - single netisr > thread eats %100 cpu > - with aesni, with netipsec/ipsec_input.c patch - 1.33Gbps > - with qat, with netipsec/ipsec_input.c patch - 2.85Gbps - > > stable/13 results are better then stable/12 but not enough fast. There is > something makes bottleneck for IPsec. So with these results it looks like we have 4 crypto threads running, which is what I'd expect for two pairs of IP addresses. There is still a single-threaded bottleneck. I would suggest generating a flame graph using DTrace and https://github.com/brendangregg/FlameGraph to see where we're spending CPU time. It would also be useful to know if we're getting errors or drops anywhere. The QAT (sysctl dev.qat.*.stats) and ESP/AH (netstat -s -p (esp|ah)) counters would be a useful start, in addition to counters from cxgbe. From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sat May 1 18:29:06 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 374846336FF for ; Sat, 1 May 2021 18:29:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FXd6p0w9Pz4mYm for ; Sat, 1 May 2021 18:29:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 1DADB633AEF; Sat, 1 May 2021 18:29:06 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D780633B40 for ; Sat, 1 May 2021 18:29:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FXd6p0Gb2z4lw3 for ; Sat, 1 May 2021 18:29:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE3A21C3D5 for ; Sat, 1 May 2021 18:29:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 141IT53C064273 for ; Sat, 1 May 2021 18:29:05 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 141IT5tG064272 for net@FreeBSD.org; Sat, 1 May 2021 18:29:05 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 255507] traceroute6 generates wrong UDP checksum Date: Sat, 01 May 2021 18:29:05 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: bin X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: emaste@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc bug_status Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 May 2021 18:29:06 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D255507 Ed Maste changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |emaste@freebsd.org Status|New |In Progress --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sat May 1 21:18:18 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58F13638B41 for ; Sat, 1 May 2021 21:18:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ozkan.kirik@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vs1-xe34.google.com (mail-vs1-xe34.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::e34]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FXht101xbz4vG6; Sat, 1 May 2021 21:18:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ozkan.kirik@gmail.com) Received: by mail-vs1-xe34.google.com with SMTP id j13so1052800vsf.2; Sat, 01 May 2021 14:18:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=qF0ily5V+WxUp3u7uIyKNpvpwZJID4EBCwR+BMhdYXU=; b=dD/048Ql+Z6FJoncMAWbmaiKLJlS5c3HKd0RN9k3lFY8AOtFKEKMbK6NHOIqCwqP2J CYHc+v0AfZ0RqBTO+F0ERak04BHXTIbs+9dHsKISE8SvwZUOsanmcKhh5Fw2fjWmfY4m 1lArhtKU/sl6OWipPGiqaklXGHu23pancUa/fZ15T4x86VH2ABN6v8T+tUPfdtutsTlP H00No5T08tbPRD+SsYnDGLLRg5Bl519JSpg9X4RukagR6NL4bn1MWacFDDFTNfm0tD13 FpMnNfWv6cT3AWUHXg15F+wMLHKq+cpPbFPVt6KUE9SErcBP4cArU2h2wvRs02ju7dgB STyg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=qF0ily5V+WxUp3u7uIyKNpvpwZJID4EBCwR+BMhdYXU=; b=hda5r+BsbAv/6fv9+3UpHb5FLa9HxHcuEjuu0pM3pbV27EuILLpYCy+SAPw/gZGW9k TqauVSBtHu2g4K4yWGy2EhN65eNijlH9fomdaBbKxMPB1FCf5xFzwNAQDXiZwSu1BxjA YvhEGHkCczjUlbQ6wZfihr+I0arIAeymaQ9EbJowVwwDhnPsOxQnAsPwrwCg5IgWnx2M 0GLPJgFiwxzMjSXVGQDSFVQIqsgaC84exbGB5FYoIYihH4yRVzYl8WoqaFtLAgu6F6WA dxjkjH4p5a1n3/GQIAnF65Vd1kGPVYz9O1+/n1Ungh1XoMqemZSGwVa5RGDLTFOnMV56 DX2A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532ty4OpRa1TMOzE8HFtDdEvQfQQSUf47x++BuUlPoOFXkPDVH5p wO+oTPetNTcsphKX3rTCg9wrFCdSBTUZ/pHFYB1kZ1ZZ X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy+LX7AYwlgRyJj2KGrcnGl2CXDQYL2dqsu26bY+nCumaHfupPIvXdD9+jn1mfp5P7rQ6mebsWzvWGf58qEILw= X-Received: by 2002:a67:f693:: with SMTP id n19mr11460689vso.55.1619903895247; Sat, 01 May 2021 14:18:15 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: =?UTF-8?B?w5Z6a2FuIEtJUklL?= Date: Sun, 2 May 2021 00:18:04 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: IPsec performace - netisr hits %100 To: Mark Johnston Cc: FreeBSD Net X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FXht101xbz4vG6 X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=dD/048Ql; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of ozkankirik@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::e34 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=ozkankirik@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.35 / 15.00]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36]; HAS_ATTACHMENT(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.97)[-0.974]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:+,3:~,4:+]; R_MIXED_CHARSET(0.62)[subject]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com:dkim]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::e34:from]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/mixed,multipart/alternative,text/plain,image/svg+xml]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::e34:from:127.0.2.255]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::e34:from]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-net] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.34 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 May 2021 21:18:18 -0000 the previous flamegraph is captured while iperf client (jail) sends to iperf server. the attached flamegraph to this mail is captured while iperf configured full-duplex mode. Throughput is about up: 1.5 Gbps down: 1.5 Gbps total: 3 Gbps On Sat, May 1, 2021 at 11:57 PM =C3=96zkan KIRIK wr= ote: > Hello, > The flamegraph is attached. > > # netstat -s > ... > ipsec: > 0 inbound packets violated process security policy > 0 inbound packets failed due to insufficient memory > 0 invalid inbound packets > 0 outbound packets violated process security policy > 0 outbound packets with no SA available > 0 outbound packets failed due to insufficient memory > 0 outbound packets with no route available > 0 invalid outbound packets > 0 outbound packets with bundled SAs > 0 spd cache hits > 0 spd cache misses > 0 clusters copied during clone > 0 mbufs inserted during makespace > ah: > 0 packets shorter than header shows > 0 packets dropped; protocol family not supported > 0 packets dropped; no TDB > 0 packets dropped; bad KCR > 0 packets dropped; queue full > 0 packets dropped; no transform > 0 replay counter wraps > 0 packets dropped; bad authentication detected > 0 packets dropped; bad authentication length > 0 possible replay packets detected > 0 packets in > 0 packets out > 0 packets dropped; invalid TDB > 0 bytes in > 0 bytes out > 0 packets dropped; larger than IP_MAXPACKET > 0 packets blocked due to policy > 0 crypto processing failures > 0 tunnel sanity check failures > AH output histogram: > aes-gmac-128: 35517864 > esp: > 0 packets shorter than header shows > 0 packets dropped; protocol family not supported > 0 packets dropped; no TDB > 0 packets dropped; bad KCR > 0 packets dropped; queue full > 20 packets dropped; no transform > 0 packets dropped; bad ilen > 0 replay counter wraps > 0 packets dropped; bad encryption detected > 0 packets dropped; bad authentication detected > 0 possible replay packets detected > 23598941 packets in > 11918943 packets out > 0 packets dropped; invalid TDB > 32247932688 bytes in > 630318292 bytes out > 0 packets dropped; larger than IP_MAXPACKET > 0 packets blocked due to policy > 0 crypto processing failures > 0 tunnel sanity check failures > ESP output histogram: > aes-gcm-16: 35517864 > > dev.qat.1.stats.sym_alloc_failures: 0 > dev.qat.1.stats.ring_full: 1267 > dev.qat.1.stats.gcm_aad_updates: 0 > dev.qat.1.stats.gcm_aad_restarts: 0 > dev.qat.1.%domain: 0 > dev.qat.1.%parent: pci16 > dev.qat.1.%pnpinfo: vendor=3D0x8086 device=3D0x37c8 subvendor=3D0x8086 > subdevice=3D0x0000 class=3D0x0b4000 > dev.qat.1.%location: slot=3D0 function=3D0 dbsf=3Dpci0:182:0:0 > dev.qat.1.%driver: qat > dev.qat.1.%desc: Intel C620/Xeon D-2100 QuickAssist PF > dev.qat.0.stats.sym_alloc_failures: 0 > dev.qat.0.stats.ring_full: 0 > dev.qat.0.stats.gcm_aad_updates: 0 > dev.qat.0.stats.gcm_aad_restarts: 0 > dev.qat.0.%domain: 0 > dev.qat.0.%parent: pci15 > dev.qat.0.%pnpinfo: vendor=3D0x8086 device=3D0x37c8 subvendor=3D0x8086 > subdevice=3D0x0000 class=3D0x0b4000 > dev.qat.0.%location: slot=3D0 function=3D0 dbsf=3Dpci0:181:0:0 > dev.qat.0.%driver: qat > dev.qat.0.%desc: Intel C620/Xeon D-2100 QuickAssist PF > dev.qat.%parent: > > > > > On Sat, May 1, 2021 at 5:51 PM Mark Johnston wrote: > >> On Sat, May 01, 2021 at 04:30:59PM +0300, =C3=96zkan KIRIK wrote: >> > This bug is related to CCR. @Navdeep Parhar , @John >> Baldwin >> > if you are interested to fix this bug related with >> CCR, I >> > can test if you provide patches. Test environment is explained in my >> first >> > email on this thread. >> > >> > @Mark Johnston Now again on stable/13, >> > - with aesni, without netipsec/ipsec_input.c patch - 1.44Gbps - single >> > netisr thread eats %100 cpu >> > - with qat, without netipsec/ipsec_input.c patch - 1.88Gbps - single >> netisr >> > thread eats %100 cpu >> > - with aesni, with netipsec/ipsec_input.c patch - 1.33Gbps >> > - with qat, with netipsec/ipsec_input.c patch - 2.85Gbps - >> > >> > stable/13 results are better then stable/12 but not enough fast. There >> is >> > something makes bottleneck for IPsec. >> >> So with these results it looks like we have 4 crypto threads running, >> which is what I'd expect for two pairs of IP addresses. There is still >> a single-threaded bottleneck. I would suggest generating a flame graph >> using DTrace and https://github.com/brendangregg/FlameGraph to see where >> we're spending CPU time. It would also be useful to know if we're >> getting errors or drops anywhere. The QAT (sysctl dev.qat.*.stats) and >> ESP/AH (netstat -s -p (esp|ah)) counters would be a useful start, in >> addition to counters from cxgbe. >> >