From nobody Mon May 24 01:05:27 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-net@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A5419ED186 for ; Mon, 24 May 2021 01:05:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 20912f6c-bc2c-11eb-96c4-525400432308@service.leadersender.com) Received: from service.leadersender.com (service.leadersender.com [107.150.101.32]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FpJt803J8z3s8l for ; Mon, 24 May 2021 01:05:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 20912f6c-bc2c-11eb-96c4-525400432308@service.leadersender.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=service.leadersender.com; i=@service.leadersender.com; q=dns/txt; s=mail; t=1621818327; h=date : from : reply-to : to : message-id : subject : mime-version : content-type : list-unsubscribe : from; bh=2h7X7SBnqAXLsTFybKtjBXWWMFGO4hnBVvx3OKBIYlY=; b=RrkzuUAnU8EKK1pBMyAHamivM5WUja/qR58aPmCnaV1Zb28bisYe9iLIYboMhhe2rG7lP vE6bgeVOFrAq1+TTiblQnWx280fuzvCVAdDQwJYBh8hf9QKNT7xvPxu5xvsiF/wnugj6y9B rkE1vcz6TgFcQwho1fWOsX1obkmuxZo= Received: from sendcloud.api (Unknown [127.0.0.1]) by SendCloud Inbound Server with ESMTPA id 4FB5A1D5-5833-4E37-B7DE-716BB37870DD.1 envelope-from (authenticated bits=0); Mon, 24 May 2021 09:05:27 +0800 Date: Mon, 24 May 2021 09:05:27 +0800 (CST) From: Xiao Reply-To: xiao To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Message-ID: <1621818327153_99612_60665_6984.sc-10_9_13_213-inbound0@service.leadersender.com> Subject: =?utf-8?q?High_adhesive_bopp_packing_tape?= List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_35407279_973763972.1621818327116" SC-Custom-nodeId: 198 SC-Custom-taskCode: 7dacfc2e-69f5-4a36-b15a-90882e887120 SC-Custom-channelId: 195 SC-Custom-invokeTime: 1621818327054 X-Remote-Web-IP: 210.14.71.144 X-SMTPAPI: X-SENDCLOUD-UUID: 1621818327153_99612_60665_6984.sc-10_9_13_213-inbound0$freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-SENDCLOUD-LOG: 1621818327153_99612_60665_6984.sc-10_9_13_213-inbound0$freebsd-net@freebsd.org#freebsd-net@freebsd.org#172121#99612#0#false#false#1#-1 X-SENDCLOUD-LOG-NEW: MTYyMTgxODMyNzE1M185OTYxMl82MDY2NV82OTg0LnNjLTEwXzlfMTNfMjEzLWluYm91bmQwJGZyZWVic2QtbmV0QGZyZWVic2Qub3JnI2ZyZWVic2QtbmV0QGZyZWVic2Qub3JnIzE3MjEyMSM5OTYxMiMwI2ZhbHNlI2ZhbHNlIzEjLTE= List-Unsubscribe: X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FpJt803J8z3s8l X-Spamd-Bar: + Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=service.leadersender.com header.s=mail header.b=RrkzuUAn; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=service.leadersender.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of 20912f6c-bc2c-11eb-96c4-525400432308@service.leadersender.com designates 107.150.101.32 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=20912f6c-bc2c-11eb-96c4-525400432308@service.leadersender.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [1.94 / 15.00]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[xiao@czjianjin.com]; ZERO_FONT(0.10)[1]; REPLYTO_DN_EQ_FROM_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; MIME_MA_MISSING_TEXT(2.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:107.150.96.0/20]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[service.leadersender.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[service.leadersender.com,none]; SUBJ_EXCESS_QP(1.20)[]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[xiao@service.leadersender.com,20912f6c-bc2c-11eb-96c4-525400432308@service.leadersender.com]; RCVD_NO_TLS_LAST(0.10)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:~]; ASN(0.00)[asn:135377, ipnet:107.150.96.0/21, country:HK]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[xiao@service.leadersender.com,20912f6c-bc2c-11eb-96c4-525400432308@service.leadersender.com]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[service.leadersender.com:s=mail]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative]; REPLYTO_DOM_NEQ_FROM_DOM(0.00)[]; HAS_LIST_UNSUB(-0.01)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; MANY_INVISIBLE_PARTS(0.05)[1]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(1.00)[1.000]; MIME_HTML_ONLY(0.20)[]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_VERYGOOD(0.00)[107.150.101.32:from]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-net] X-Spam: Yes ------=_Part_35407279_973763972.1621818327116 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi, Xiao sent you an email.

Let's take a look at the new tendency in your purch= asing circle!

Not interested? Unsubscribe
<= /tr>
= =
=
=

= RECOMMEND

=

launch= ed by =

=
=
=
=
=

= Quick View

=
=
= = =

High adhesive bopp packing tape = =

=
= = =
=

= = Brand : Tongming = = Material : = Bopp = = = Adhesive ty= pe : Wa= ter activataed = = Glue : = Acrylic = Usage : = Carton sealing = = = Printing : Offer printing = = Color: = as customer required = = = Specifications: (35mic-68mic)*(12mm-72mm) = = Tensile strengh: = 25N/CM = = = Permament adhesion: >24 hours =

=
=
= = =

=

More= Information

= = =
=

3D""

=

= 3D""=

3D""

=

=
=
= = =
=
<= table cellspacing=3D"0" cellpadding=3D"0" style=3D"width:100%;background-co= lor:#F0F0F0;"> <= td background=3D"http://edm-cus-tpl.piccloud03.com/RECOMMEND.png" style=3D"= margin:0px; text-align: center;background-color: white; hei= ght:106px;padding-bottom: 15px; background-repeat: no-repe= at; background-position:50% 50%; backgrou= nd-size: initial; ">

= = = = =
=
=

= = =
=
=
= = = = =
=
=

Contact us

3D""
=

=
Xiao = - Export Dept.
=
xiao@czjianjin.com
=

=

+86 19802503= 310

<= /p>

Tel:  +86 1980= 2503310

Fax:  +86 = 81661854

Whatsapp: &nbs= p;+undefined 19802503310

Wec= hat:  Forgive_end

=
=
<= p style=3D"margin:0px;font-size:12px;font-family:Arial;color: #999999;line-= height: 23px;text-align: left;">Wechat QR code

=
=

Changz= hou Jian Jin Protective Products Co.,Ltd

=

=

No. 28 Zouqu Indist= rial District,, Changzhou, Jiangsu, China =

= = = = =

=

W= e're commissioned by user to send this email. If you do not wish to receive= it, please click to unsubscribe.

This message was sent to freebsd-net@freebsd.org by Xinbee= Mail.

Unsub= scribe

------=_Part_35407279_973763972.1621818327116-- From nobody Mon May 24 03:05:39 2021 X-Original-To: net@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D96499FF25E for ; Mon, 24 May 2021 03:05:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FpMXf5hrdz3rfR for ; Mon, 24 May 2021 03:05:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC7D622CC3 for ; Mon, 24 May 2021 03:05:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 14O35cvc030503 for ; Mon, 24 May 2021 03:05:38 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 14O35cWM030502 for net@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 24 May 2021 03:05:38 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 255874] netgraph: Fix a double free in ng_checksum_rcvdata Date: Mon, 24 May 2021 03:05:39 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: koobs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: donner@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: mfc-stable13+ mfc-stable12+ mfc-stable11+ X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: flagtypes.name bug_file_loc short_desc keywords Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D255874 Kubilay Kocak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |mfc-stable13+, | |mfc-stable12+, | |mfc-stable11+ URL| |https://reviews.freebsd.org | |/D30273 Summary|[PATCH] netgraph: Fix a |netgraph: Fix a double free |double free in |in ng_checksum_rcvdata |ng_checksum_rcvdata | Keywords|patch | --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From nobody Mon May 24 05:54:19 2021 X-Original-To: net@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2DC29F1AAC for ; Mon, 24 May 2021 05:54:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FpRHL1xGkz4jJV for ; Mon, 24 May 2021 05:54:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D26A24971 for ; Mon, 24 May 2021 05:54:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 14O5sLgG018711 for ; Mon, 24 May 2021 05:54:21 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 14O5sLDK018710 for net@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 24 May 2021 05:54:21 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 230465] ixl: not working in netmap mode Date: Mon, 24 May 2021 05:54:19 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.1-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: IntelNetworking X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: strongswan@Nanoteq.com X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D230465 --- Comment #46 from strongswan@Nanoteq.com --- (In reply to strongswan from comment #45) I did some more testing, and even with the setting hw.ixl.enable_head_write= back =3D 0 I still get to a situation where no packets are transmitted. There is however a much longer interval between when the issues are occurri= ng. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From nobody Tue May 25 06:16:48 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-net@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFB999EAF1B for ; Tue, 25 May 2021 06:17:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kevin.bowling@kev009.com) Received: from mail-yb1-xb2c.google.com (mail-yb1-xb2c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b2c]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Fq3l06W24z3hYj for ; Tue, 25 May 2021 06:17:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kevin.bowling@kev009.com) Received: by mail-yb1-xb2c.google.com with SMTP id o18so3767826ybc.8 for ; Mon, 24 May 2021 23:17:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kev009.com; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=VP2JHCEKB9G1BaPxFVZsWryjrZubP7cisBmLwZxPb7Q=; b=iNNY0M4MnNiopQSwBanvZEctY0mZcnqPDlPGQJwBi/D+ebpxFa9NMqj87W9HSQsjN7 i9PGws7hlPOz3iAkC4BWaf2h5EPFLVZ9dc2mkhnVjJIQ1DXSa9d4KGPN+nkpm95DbSeU kdbtmLal6O1fF9yZ5+K/PBJ3d763cyYFkTRB0= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=VP2JHCEKB9G1BaPxFVZsWryjrZubP7cisBmLwZxPb7Q=; b=ZPIACxviMSADU7cbfUNRQibZGnmVIC4Gbb+Ms2HseHiNCro7qxFr1MGdHMojfqw0He FnooWKPF7oaoZx647qUQ29e1XZ34pSAXIeW+LLRDgv+ClKlxtYMKHyf6cnHy5666CSdX SoTGt3Mz49aR9W7hMMxSls1VfxJ1WVHPUIQ30kQyz8K3nEJ1RmkS0xJsWMuU6HqrApWD HB3MIh4eLsqLgzPxZ2YpVA39UjMv1+msYBid3txnpJgcuJLtB46msj4S8TEko3z+3BfB xpIBp4xeXzjAQiKQ05gZEAScYVC3IPYph7LLAr2BENokWfELjAIf//9ykRcMtLXdezxQ uoVA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530tn8zIxaT1AQC1ce2GjZd/7BKnE0WA2JZ2WtO8WdeX5um9Pr56 96gaoPkTT1WHYL9rSS6WCV50EiUlmzqk+dENzfp0YQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwqdox8es5QKPUmdpJvfq2LSCbRIP3FmVWEcz3WHPNb5X2RNJJmd8fXNCBshmhLYXoHveU0BggyT8R9wRjau3M= X-Received: by 2002:a25:44d6:: with SMTP id r205mr39564485yba.455.1621923419821; Mon, 24 May 2021 23:16:59 -0700 (PDT) List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <91e21d18a4214af4898dd09f11144493@EX16-05.ad.unipi.it> <20210517192054.0907beea@x23> In-Reply-To: From: Kevin Bowling Date: Mon, 24 May 2021 23:16:48 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Vector Packet Processing (VPP) portability on FreeBSD To: Vincenzo Maffione Cc: Marko Zec , Francois ten Krooden , Jacques Fourie , "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Fq3l06W24z3hYj X-Spamd-Bar: ++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none (invalid DKIM record) header.d=kev009.com header.s=google header.b=iNNY0M4M; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of kevin.bowling@kev009.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::b2c as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=kevin.bowling@kev009.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [2.05 / 15.00]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_SOME(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_CC(0.00)[fer.hr,nanoteq.com,gmail.com,freebsd.org]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36]; RCPT_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[kev009.com:~]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::b2c:from]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.85)[0.847]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-net@freebsd.org]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(1.00)[1.000]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[kev009.com]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::b2c:from:127.0.2.255]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::b2c:from]; R_DKIM_PERMFAIL(0.00)[kev009.com:s=google]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-net]; SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS(1.50)[] I don't fully understand the issue, but in iflib_fast_intr_rxtx https://cgit.freebsd.org/src/tree/sys/net/iflib.c#n1581 it seems like we end up re-enabling interrupts per course instead of only handling spurious cases or some low water threshold (which seems like it would be tricky to do here). The idea is we want to pump interrupts by disabling them in the msix_que handler, and then wait to re-enable only when we have more work to do in the ift_task grouptask. It was a lot easier to reason about this with separate TX and RX interrupts. Doing the combined TXRX is definitely a win in terms of reducing msi-x vector usage (which is important in a lot of FreeBSD use cases), but it's tricky to understand. My time has been sucked away due to work, so I haven't been looking at this problem to the depth I want to. I'd be interested in discussing it further with anyone that is interested in it. Regards, Kevin On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 2:11 PM Vincenzo Maffione w= rote: > > > > Il giorno mar 18 mag 2021 alle ore 09:32 Kevin Bowling ha scritto: >> >> >> >> On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 10:20 AM Marko Zec wrote: >>> >>> On Mon, 17 May 2021 09:53:25 +0000 >>> Francois ten Krooden wrote: >>> >>> > On 2021/05/16 09:22, Vincenzo Maffione wrote: >>> > >>> > > >>> > > Hi, >>> > > Yes, you are not using emulated netmap mode. >>> > > >>> > > In the test setup depicted here >>> > > https://github.com/ftk-ntq/vpp/wiki/VPP-throughput-using-netmap- >>> > > interfaces#test-setup >>> > > I think you should really try to replace VPP with the netmap >>> > > "bridge" application (tools/tools/netmap/bridge.c), and see what >>> > > numbers you get. >>> > > >>> > > You would run the application this way >>> > > # bridge -i ix0 -i ix1 >>> > > and this will forward any traffic between ix0 and ix1 (in both >>> > > directions). >>> > > >>> > > These numbers would give you a better idea of where to look next >>> > > (e.g. VPP code improvements or system tuning such as NIC >>> > > interrupts, CPU binding, etc.). >>> > >>> > Thank you for the suggestion. >>> > I did run a test with the bridge this morning, and updated the >>> > results as well. +-------------+------------------+ >>> > | Packet Size | Throughput (pps) | >>> > +-------------+------------------+ >>> > | 64 bytes | 7.197 Mpps | >>> > | 128 bytes | 7.638 Mpps | >>> > | 512 bytes | 2.358 Mpps | >>> > | 1280 bytes | 964.915 kpps | >>> > | 1518 bytes | 815.239 kpps | >>> > +-------------+------------------+ >>> >>> I assume you're on 13.0 where netmap throughput is lower compared to >>> 11.x due to migration of most drivers to iflib (apparently increased >>> overhead) and different driver defaults. On 11.x I could move 10G line >>> rate from one ix to another at low CPU freqs, where on 13.x the CPU >>> must be set to max speed, and still can't do 14.88 Mpps. >> >> >> I believe this issue is in the combined txrx interrupt filter. It is ca= using a bunch of unnecessary tx re-arms. > > > Could you please elaborate on that? > > TX completion is indeed the one thing that changed considerably with the = porting to iflib. And this could be a major contributor to the performance = drop. > My understanding is that TX interrupts are not really used anymore on mul= ti-gigabit NICs such as ix or ixl. Instead, "softirqs" are used, meaning th= at a timer is used to perform TX completion. I don't know what the motivati= ons were for this design decision. > I had to decrease the timer period to 90us to ensure timely completion (s= ee https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D248652). However, th= e timer period is currently not adaptive. > > >> >> >>> >>> #1 thing which changed: default # of packets per ring dropped down from >>> 2048 (11.x) to 1024 (13.x). Try changing this in /boot/loader.conf: >>> >>> dev.ixl.0.iflib.override_nrxds=3D2048 >>> dev.ixl.0.iflib.override_ntxds=3D2048 >>> dev.ixl.1.iflib.override_nrxds=3D2048 >>> dev.ixl.1.iflib.override_ntxds=3D2048 >>> etc. >>> >>> For me this increases the throughput of >>> bridge -i netmap:ixl0 -i netmap:ixl1 >>> from 9.3 Mpps to 11.4 Mpps >>> >>> #2: default interrupt moderation delays seem to be too long. Combined >>> with increasing the ring sizes, reducing dev.ixl.0.rx_itr from 62 >>> (default) to 40 increases the throughput further from 11.4 to 14.5 Mpps >>> >>> Hope this helps, >>> >>> Marko >>> >>> >>> > Besides for the 64-byte and 128-byte packets the other sizes where >>> > matching the maximum rates possible on 10Gbps. This was when the >>> > bridge application was running on a single core, and the cpu core was >>> > maxing out at a 100%. >>> > >>> > I think there might be a bit of system tuning needed, but I suspect >>> > most of the improvement would be needed in VPP. >>> > >>> > Regards >>> > Francois >>> _______________________________________________ >>> freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list >>> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From nobody Tue May 25 06:34:16 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-net@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C2F09F4B42 for ; Tue, 25 May 2021 06:34:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kevin.bowling@kev009.com) Received: from mail-yb1-xb2f.google.com (mail-yb1-xb2f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b2f]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Fq47914mpz3qBf for ; Tue, 25 May 2021 06:34:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kevin.bowling@kev009.com) Received: by mail-yb1-xb2f.google.com with SMTP id y36so24867755ybi.11 for ; Mon, 24 May 2021 23:34:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kev009.com; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=y+KccFs2oQqKia5PolT4sU0d4wouFEGyCTgLahlMB9U=; b=r7+JlHKiL1+nfSVbA/ZUNJayZz8m7MZ2mSMl2p0ZMg9x6+5ojxPBzV07u/cUFmaTcK llYQ/RE08YHfu0PIcSndkXjh8p+0P9jggQAcGbPcIMrjevEOM6trhWkDmEbHCCCoM7Cn ErfD6AC+IyhEmep0+BwHILTsIwixbhR+jKm4k= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=y+KccFs2oQqKia5PolT4sU0d4wouFEGyCTgLahlMB9U=; b=bESzhgf7Xafk4f1O73hptfVffnEIsLSsCziinTSFAIrGvqb15Oc86gP9tMl/9B31pl /P1OTlb+z6hYQNZimNedm3kDafJOOxUFhOvu4qR9dLO3ttKEFm5/bhibgnrChGuYkscS E1DL/lgEOX17FikSUSE9ssH9wh47/pNbOYeYbjqCpKM/FobHL0guFIU1jbZav/mqe0tE 2k8jg4ZTRTU4Xke9Ji77k+9nD5Q4qBfcLtdpOVGy8nYjRNO08XQJSC5YF7CfJLKVGuk1 4y7uqjnGMQGG5ivXoON/RLw/RAe77UTtA30OpXSsl4zNzkKDS2QmxPVJCP2vswnmF+QI ixng== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530AET7bXiSurqYGnoztwiGrByasmf7hBMFYFS6AHLuqKw8KGh7R aKqayBv8n4oZp0d88QSSfFRNjBDizGEz4lE5ByOi9Q== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy3owA4HiK2RDDMnTdAVVoxG53DouDDaSe/vpQHsRHnsj6G0knlmwQQ7sbtapd/F0imbkTwTs8kq1uH5HauZx4= X-Received: by 2002:a25:ce51:: with SMTP id x78mr42927746ybe.87.1621924467850; Mon, 24 May 2021 23:34:27 -0700 (PDT) List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <91e21d18a4214af4898dd09f11144493@EX16-05.ad.unipi.it> <20210517192054.0907beea@x23> In-Reply-To: From: Kevin Bowling Date: Mon, 24 May 2021 23:34:16 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Vector Packet Processing (VPP) portability on FreeBSD To: Vincenzo Maffione Cc: Francois ten Krooden , Jacques Fourie , Marko Zec , "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000c2538805c321b7f6" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Fq47914mpz3qBf X-Spamd-Bar: ++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none (invalid DKIM record) header.d=kev009.com header.s=google header.b=r7+JlHKi; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of kevin.bowling@kev009.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::b2f as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=kevin.bowling@kev009.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [2.05 / 15.00]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_SOME(0.00)[]; SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS(1.50)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36:c]; RCPT_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[kev009.com:~]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::b2f:from]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.85)[0.846]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-net@freebsd.org]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(1.00)[1.000]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[kev009.com]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::b2f:from:127.0.2.255]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::b2f:from]; R_DKIM_PERMFAIL(0.00)[kev009.com:s=google]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-net]; FREEMAIL_CC(0.00)[nanoteq.com,gmail.com,fer.hr,freebsd.org] X-Spam: Yes --000000000000c2538805c321b7f6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable The one other thing I want to mention, what this means in effect is every que ends up limited by EITR on ixgbe (around 30kps with the default settings) whether it=E2=80=99s a TX or RX workload. This ends up working o= k if you have sufficient CPU but seems awkward. On the TX workload we should need a magnitude less interrupts to do 10g. There was some work to adapt AIM to this new combined handler but it is not properly tuned and I=E2=80=99m not = sure it should consider TX at all. Regards, Kevin On Mon, May 24, 2021 at 11:16 PM Kevin Bowling wrote: > I don't fully understand the issue, but in iflib_fast_intr_rxtx > https://cgit.freebsd.org/src/tree/sys/net/iflib.c#n1581 it seems like > we end up re-enabling interrupts per course instead of only handling > spurious cases or some low water threshold (which seems like it would > be tricky to do here). The idea is we want to pump interrupts by > disabling them in the msix_que handler, and then wait to re-enable > only when we have more work to do in the ift_task grouptask. > > It was a lot easier to reason about this with separate TX and RX > interrupts. Doing the combined TXRX is definitely a win in terms of > reducing msi-x vector usage (which is important in a lot of FreeBSD > use cases), but it's tricky to understand. > > My time has been sucked away due to work, so I haven't been looking at > this problem to the depth I want to. I'd be interested in discussing > it further with anyone that is interested in it. > > Regards, > Kevin > > On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 2:11 PM Vincenzo Maffione > wrote: > > > > > > > > Il giorno mar 18 mag 2021 alle ore 09:32 Kevin Bowling < > kevin.bowling@kev009.com> ha scritto: > >> > >> > >> > >> On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 10:20 AM Marko Zec wrote: > >>> > >>> On Mon, 17 May 2021 09:53:25 +0000 > >>> Francois ten Krooden wrote: > >>> > >>> > On 2021/05/16 09:22, Vincenzo Maffione wrote: > >>> > > >>> > > > >>> > > Hi, > >>> > > Yes, you are not using emulated netmap mode. > >>> > > > >>> > > In the test setup depicted here > >>> > > https://github.com/ftk-ntq/vpp/wiki/VPP-throughput-using-netmap- > >>> > > interfaces#test-setup > >>> > > I think you should really try to replace VPP with the netmap > >>> > > "bridge" application (tools/tools/netmap/bridge.c), and see what > >>> > > numbers you get. > >>> > > > >>> > > You would run the application this way > >>> > > # bridge -i ix0 -i ix1 > >>> > > and this will forward any traffic between ix0 and ix1 (in both > >>> > > directions). > >>> > > > >>> > > These numbers would give you a better idea of where to look next > >>> > > (e.g. VPP code improvements or system tuning such as NIC > >>> > > interrupts, CPU binding, etc.). > >>> > > >>> > Thank you for the suggestion. > >>> > I did run a test with the bridge this morning, and updated the > >>> > results as well. +-------------+------------------+ > >>> > | Packet Size | Throughput (pps) | > >>> > +-------------+------------------+ > >>> > | 64 bytes | 7.197 Mpps | > >>> > | 128 bytes | 7.638 Mpps | > >>> > | 512 bytes | 2.358 Mpps | > >>> > | 1280 bytes | 964.915 kpps | > >>> > | 1518 bytes | 815.239 kpps | > >>> > +-------------+------------------+ > >>> > >>> I assume you're on 13.0 where netmap throughput is lower compared to > >>> 11.x due to migration of most drivers to iflib (apparently increased > >>> overhead) and different driver defaults. On 11.x I could move 10G li= ne > >>> rate from one ix to another at low CPU freqs, where on 13.x the CPU > >>> must be set to max speed, and still can't do 14.88 Mpps. > >> > >> > >> I believe this issue is in the combined txrx interrupt filter. It is > causing a bunch of unnecessary tx re-arms. > > > > > > Could you please elaborate on that? > > > > TX completion is indeed the one thing that changed considerably with th= e > porting to iflib. And this could be a major contributor to the performanc= e > drop. > > My understanding is that TX interrupts are not really used anymore on > multi-gigabit NICs such as ix or ixl. Instead, "softirqs" are used, meani= ng > that a timer is used to perform TX completion. I don't know what the > motivations were for this design decision. > > I had to decrease the timer period to 90us to ensure timely completion > (see https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D248652). However= , > the timer period is currently not adaptive. > > > > > >> > >> > >>> > >>> #1 thing which changed: default # of packets per ring dropped down fr= om > >>> 2048 (11.x) to 1024 (13.x). Try changing this in /boot/loader.conf: > >>> > >>> dev.ixl.0.iflib.override_nrxds=3D2048 > >>> dev.ixl.0.iflib.override_ntxds=3D2048 > >>> dev.ixl.1.iflib.override_nrxds=3D2048 > >>> dev.ixl.1.iflib.override_ntxds=3D2048 > >>> etc. > >>> > >>> For me this increases the throughput of > >>> bridge -i netmap:ixl0 -i netmap:ixl1 > >>> from 9.3 Mpps to 11.4 Mpps > >>> > >>> #2: default interrupt moderation delays seem to be too long. Combine= d > >>> with increasing the ring sizes, reducing dev.ixl.0.rx_itr from 62 > >>> (default) to 40 increases the throughput further from 11.4 to 14.5 Mp= ps > >>> > >>> Hope this helps, > >>> > >>> Marko > >>> > >>> > >>> > Besides for the 64-byte and 128-byte packets the other sizes where > >>> > matching the maximum rates possible on 10Gbps. This was when the > >>> > bridge application was running on a single core, and the cpu core w= as > >>> > maxing out at a 100%. > >>> > > >>> > I think there might be a bit of system tuning needed, but I suspect > >>> > most of the improvement would be needed in VPP. > >>> > > >>> > Regards > >>> > Francois > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > >>> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org= " > --000000000000c2538805c321b7f6 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
The one other thing I want to mention, what this means in= effect is every que ends up limited by EITR on ixgbe (around 30kps with th= e default settings) whether it=E2=80=99s a TX or RX workload.=C2=A0 This en= ds up working ok if you have sufficient CPU but seems awkward.=C2=A0 On the= TX workload we should need a magnitude less interrupts to do 10g. There wa= s some work to adapt AIM to this new combined handler but it is not properl= y tuned and I=E2=80=99m not sure it should consider TX at all.

Regards,
Kevi= n

On Mon, May 24, 2021 at 11:16 PM Kevin Bowling <kevin.bowling@kev009.com> wrote:
=
I don't fully understand the issue, but in iflib_fast_= intr_rxtx
https://cgit.freebsd.org/src/tree/sys/net/ifl= ib.c#n1581 it seems like
we end up re-enabling interrupts per course instead of only handling
spurious cases or some low water threshold (which seems like it would
be tricky to do here).=C2=A0 The idea is we want to pump interrupts by
disabling them in the msix_que handler, and then wait to re-enable
only when we have more work to do in the ift_task grouptask.

It was a lot easier to reason about this with separate TX and RX
interrupts.=C2=A0 Doing the combined TXRX is definitely a win in terms of reducing msi-x vector usage (which is important in a lot of FreeBSD
use cases), but it's tricky to understand.

My time has been sucked away due to work, so I haven't been looking at<= br> this problem to the depth I want to.=C2=A0 I'd be interested in discuss= ing
it further with anyone that is interested in it.

Regards,
Kevin

On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 2:11 PM Vincenzo Maffione <vmaffione@freebsd.org> wrote:<= br> >
>
>
> Il giorno mar 18 mag 2021 alle ore 09:32 Kevin Bowling <kevin.bowling@kev009.com= > ha scritto:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 10:20 AM Marko Zec <zec@fer.hr> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, 17 May 2021 09:53:25 +0000
>>> Francois ten Krooden <ftk@Nanoteq.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> > On 2021/05/16 09:22, Vincenzo Maffione wrote:
>>> >
>>> > >
>>> > > Hi,
>>> > >=C2=A0 =C2=A0Yes, you are not using emulated netmap m= ode.
>>> > >
>>> > >=C2=A0 =C2=A0In the test setup depicted here
>>> > > https://githu= b.com/ftk-ntq/vpp/wiki/VPP-throughput-using-netmap-
>>> > > interfaces#test-setup
>>> > > I think you should really try to replace VPP with th= e netmap
>>> > > "bridge" application (tools/tools/netmap/b= ridge.c), and see what
>>> > > numbers you get.
>>> > >
>>> > > You would run the application this way
>>> > > # bridge -i ix0 -i ix1
>>> > > and this will forward any traffic between ix0 and ix= 1 (in both
>>> > > directions).
>>> > >
>>> > > These numbers would give you a better idea of where = to look next
>>> > > (e.g. VPP code improvements or system tuning such as= NIC
>>> > > interrupts, CPU binding, etc.).
>>> >
>>> > Thank you for the suggestion.
>>> > I did run a test with the bridge this morning, and update= d the
>>> > results as well. +-------------+------------------+
>>> > | Packet Size | Throughput (pps) |
>>> > +-------------+------------------+
>>> > |=C2=A0 =C2=A064 bytes=C2=A0 |=C2=A0 =C2=A0 7.197 Mpps=C2= =A0 =C2=A0 |
>>> > |=C2=A0 128 bytes=C2=A0 |=C2=A0 =C2=A0 7.638 Mpps=C2=A0 = =C2=A0 |
>>> > |=C2=A0 512 bytes=C2=A0 |=C2=A0 =C2=A0 2.358 Mpps=C2=A0 = =C2=A0 |
>>> > | 1280 bytes=C2=A0 |=C2=A0 964.915 kpps=C2=A0 =C2=A0 | >>> > | 1518 bytes=C2=A0 |=C2=A0 815.239 kpps=C2=A0 =C2=A0 | >>> > +-------------+------------------+
>>>
>>> I assume you're on 13.0 where netmap throughput is lower c= ompared to
>>> 11.x due to migration of most drivers to iflib (apparently inc= reased
>>> overhead) and different driver defaults.=C2=A0 On 11.x I could= move 10G line
>>> rate from one ix to another at low CPU freqs, where on 13.x th= e CPU
>>> must be set to max speed, and still can't do 14.88 Mpps. >>
>>
>> I believe this issue is in the combined txrx interrupt filter.=C2= =A0 It is causing a bunch of unnecessary tx re-arms.
>
>
> Could you please elaborate on that?
>
> TX completion is indeed the one thing that changed considerably with t= he porting to iflib. And this could be a major contributor to the performan= ce drop.
> My understanding is that TX interrupts are not really used anymore on = multi-gigabit NICs such as ix or ixl. Instead, "softirqs" are use= d, meaning that a timer is used to perform TX completion. I don't know = what the motivations were for this design decision.
> I had to decrease the timer period to 90us to ensure timely completion= (see https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/sh= ow_bug.cgi?id=3D248652). However, the timer period is currently not ada= ptive.
>
>
>>
>>
>>>
>>> #1 thing which changed: default # of packets per ring dropped = down from
>>> 2048 (11.x) to 1024 (13.x).=C2=A0 Try changing this in /boot/l= oader.conf:
>>>
>>> dev.ixl.0.iflib.override_nrxds=3D2048
>>> dev.ixl.0.iflib.override_ntxds=3D2048
>>> dev.ixl.1.iflib.override_nrxds=3D2048
>>> dev.ixl.1.iflib.override_ntxds=3D2048
>>> etc.
>>>
>>> For me this increases the throughput of
>>> bridge -i netmap:ixl0 -i netmap:ixl1
>>> from 9.3 Mpps to 11.4 Mpps
>>>
>>> #2: default interrupt moderation delays seem to be too long.= =C2=A0 Combined
>>> with increasing the ring sizes, reducing dev.ixl.0.rx_itr from= 62
>>> (default) to 40 increases the throughput further from 11.4 to = 14.5 Mpps
>>>
>>> Hope this helps,
>>>
>>> Marko
>>>
>>>
>>> > Besides for the 64-byte and 128-byte packets the other si= zes where
>>> > matching the maximum rates possible on 10Gbps. This was w= hen the
>>> > bridge application was running on a single core, and the = cpu core was
>>> > maxing out at a 100%.
>>> >
>>> > I think there might be a bit of system tuning needed, but= I suspect
>>> > most of the improvement would be needed in VPP.
>>> >
>>> > Regards
>>> > Francois
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> f= reebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
>>> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman= /listinfo/freebsd-net
>>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@f= reebsd.org"
--000000000000c2538805c321b7f6-- From nobody Tue May 25 15:36:07 2021 X-Original-To: net@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35618B93A44 for ; Tue, 25 May 2021 15:36:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FqJ890yn8z3LMc for ; Tue, 25 May 2021 15:36:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 05AA0202B0 for ; Tue, 25 May 2021 15:36:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 14PFa8EI022553 for ; Tue, 25 May 2021 15:36:08 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 14PFa87p022552 for net@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 25 May 2021 15:36:08 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 255859] [Patch] ipfilter/netinent: Fix a use after free in ipf_nat_rule_deref Date: Tue, 25 May 2021 15:36:07 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: markj@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D255859 Mark Johnston changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|New |Open CC| |cy@FreeBSD.org, | |markj@FreeBSD.org --- Comment #2 from Mark Johnston --- Cy, could you take a look at this? --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From nobody Tue May 25 16:34:50 2021 X-Original-To: net@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F931B96E63 for ; Tue, 25 May 2021 16:34:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FqKRt3c05z3hkR for ; Tue, 25 May 2021 16:34:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6093C20FE1 for ; Tue, 25 May 2021 16:34:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 14PGYoEr056076 for ; Tue, 25 May 2021 16:34:50 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 14PGYoYR056075 for net@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 25 May 2021 16:34:50 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 255872] [PATCH] netgraph/bluetooth/hci: Fix a use after free in le_connection_complete Date: Tue, 25 May 2021 16:34:50 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: markj@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: markj@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc bug_status assigned_to Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D255872 Mark Johnston changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |markj@FreeBSD.org Status|New |Open Assignee|net@FreeBSD.org |markj@FreeBSD.org --- Comment #1 from Mark Johnston --- https://reviews.freebsd.org/D30454 --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From nobody Tue May 25 16:54:48 2021 X-Original-To: net@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E43CEBF0AB7 for ; Tue, 25 May 2021 16:54:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FqKtx62HXz3kvt for ; Tue, 25 May 2021 16:54:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B7A9A21391 for ; Tue, 25 May 2021 16:54:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 14PGsnMJ064237 for ; Tue, 25 May 2021 16:54:49 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 14PGsnsB064236 for net@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 25 May 2021 16:54:49 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 255859] [Patch] ipfilter/netinent: Fix a use after free in ipf_nat_rule_deref Date: Tue, 25 May 2021 16:54:48 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: cy@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: cy@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: assigned_to Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D255859 Cy Schubert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|net@FreeBSD.org |cy@FreeBSD.org --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From nobody Tue May 25 23:20:55 2021 X-Original-To: net@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42BF8C09272 for ; Tue, 25 May 2021 23:20:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FqVSS1Lvmz4jTR for ; Tue, 25 May 2021 23:20:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 180E7261CA for ; Tue, 25 May 2021 23:20:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 14PNKuRA066115 for ; Tue, 25 May 2021 23:20:56 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 14PNKuJX066104 for net@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 25 May 2021 23:20:56 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 255859] [Patch] ipfilter/netinent: Fix a memory leak in ipf_nat_rule_deref Date: Tue, 25 May 2021 23:20:55 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: rgrimes@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: cy@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D255859 Rodney W. Grimes changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |net@FreeBSD.org --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From nobody Tue May 25 23:22:36 2021 X-Original-To: net@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6852EC0A394 for ; Tue, 25 May 2021 23:22:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FqVVN2SwNz4k80 for ; Tue, 25 May 2021 23:22:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3D49C265DE for ; Tue, 25 May 2021 23:22:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 14PNMaPf068101 for ; Tue, 25 May 2021 23:22:36 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 14PNMaUc068100 for net@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 25 May 2021 23:22:36 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 255872] [PATCH] netgraph/bluetooth/hci: Fix a use after free in le_connection_complete Date: Tue, 25 May 2021 23:22:36 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: rgrimes@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: markj@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D255872 Rodney W. Grimes changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |net@FreeBSD.org --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From nobody Wed May 26 00:59:45 2021 X-Original-To: net@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79BB9BF1F76 for ; Wed, 26 May 2021 00:59:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FqXfV2v09z3CT0 for ; Wed, 26 May 2021 00:59:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C78F275AD for ; Wed, 26 May 2021 00:59:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 14Q0xkdv016691 for ; Wed, 26 May 2021 00:59:46 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 14Q0xkUc016690 for net@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 26 May 2021 00:59:46 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 255859] ipfilter/netinent: ip_nat memory leak and use-after-free Date: Wed, 26 May 2021 00:59:45 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-qa X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: koobs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: cy@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: mfc-stable13? mfc-stable12? mfc-stable11? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: keywords flagtypes.name short_desc bug_status Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D255859 Kubilay Kocak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |needs-qa Flags| |mfc-stable13?, | |mfc-stable12?, | |mfc-stable11? Summary|[Patch] ipfilter/netinent: |ipfilter/netinent: ip_nat |Fix a memory leak in |memory leak and |ipf_nat_rule_deref |use-after-free Status|Open |In Progress --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From nobody Wed May 26 01:00:22 2021 X-Original-To: net@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 338ADBF25C5 for ; Wed, 26 May 2021 01:00:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FqXgB0cyvz3CZv for ; Wed, 26 May 2021 01:00:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F186A27A0C for ; Wed, 26 May 2021 01:00:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 14Q10LMV016891 for ; Wed, 26 May 2021 01:00:21 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 14Q10LvZ016890 for net@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 26 May 2021 01:00:21 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 255872] netgraph/bluetooth/hci: Fix a use after free in le_connection_complete Date: Wed, 26 May 2021 01:00:22 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-qa X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: koobs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: markj@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: mfc-stable13? mfc-stable12? mfc-stable11? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_file_loc flagtypes.name keywords short_desc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D255872 Kubilay Kocak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- URL| |https://reviews.freebsd.org | |/D30454 Flags| |mfc-stable13?, | |mfc-stable12?, | |mfc-stable11? Keywords| |needs-qa Summary|[PATCH] |netgraph/bluetooth/hci: Fix |netgraph/bluetooth/hci: Fix |a use after free in |a use after free in |le_connection_complete |le_connection_complete | --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From nobody Wed May 26 09:31:11 2021 X-Original-To: net@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BFAFCF887A for ; Wed, 26 May 2021 09:31:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Fqm0c1dsYz4Z7l for ; Wed, 26 May 2021 09:31:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 21E20617F for ; Wed, 26 May 2021 09:31:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 14Q9VC5D074371 for ; Wed, 26 May 2021 09:31:12 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from bugzilla@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 14Q9VC8q074370 for net@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 26 May 2021 09:31:12 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: bugzilla set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 255872] netgraph/bluetooth/hci: Fix a use after free in le_connection_complete Date: Wed, 26 May 2021 09:31:11 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-qa X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: commit-hook@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: markj@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: mfc-stable13? mfc-stable12? mfc-stable11? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D255872 --- Comment #2 from commit-hook@FreeBSD.org --- A commit in branch main references this bug: URL: https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/src/commit/?id=3D14803ec8d193d8d46f4137a7dba61b277= c6a2fed commit 14803ec8d193d8d46f4137a7dba61b277c6a2fed Author: Takanori Watanabe AuthorDate: 2021-05-26 09:23:33 +0000 Commit: Takanori Watanabe CommitDate: 2021-05-26 09:23:33 +0000 Fix a use-after-free in an error case. PR: 255872 Submitted by: lylgood Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D30454 sys/netgraph/bluetooth/hci/ng_hci_evnt.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From nobody Wed May 26 09:32:47 2021 X-Original-To: net@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C67E7CF95D4 for ; Wed, 26 May 2021 09:32:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Fqm2R4Vs0z4b1t for ; Wed, 26 May 2021 09:32:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 828236569 for ; Wed, 26 May 2021 09:32:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 14Q9Wl3c078429 for ; Wed, 26 May 2021 09:32:47 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 14Q9WlXV078428 for net@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 26 May 2021 09:32:47 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 255872] netgraph/bluetooth/hci: Fix a use after free in le_connection_complete Date: Wed, 26 May 2021 09:32:47 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-qa X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: takawata@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: markj@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: mfc-stable13? mfc-stable12? mfc-stable11? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cc resolution Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D255872 Takanori Watanabe changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|Open |Closed CC| |takawata@FreeBSD.org Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #3 from Takanori Watanabe --- Looks good, Thanks. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From nobody Wed May 26 16:52:49 2021 X-Original-To: net@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92ED0BFB70B for ; Wed, 26 May 2021 16:52:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FqxpB3gZyz3qr6 for ; Wed, 26 May 2021 16:52:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 66B0514654 for ; Wed, 26 May 2021 16:52:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 14QGqo2x004132 for ; Wed, 26 May 2021 16:52:50 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 14QGqovX004131 for net@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 26 May 2021 16:52:50 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 255872] netgraph/bluetooth/hci: Fix a use after free in le_connection_complete Date: Wed, 26 May 2021 16:52:49 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-qa X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: emaste@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: markj@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: mfc-stable13? mfc-stable12? mfc-stable11? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D255872 Ed Maste changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |emaste@freebsd.org --- Comment #4 from Ed Maste --- We should MFC this to stable branches also --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From nobody Wed May 26 19:36:31 2021 X-Original-To: net@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF34FC7B023 for ; Wed, 26 May 2021 19:36:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Fr1R45jR8z4YYr for ; Wed, 26 May 2021 19:36:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB91316AED for ; Wed, 26 May 2021 19:36:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 14QJaW7S088221 for ; Wed, 26 May 2021 19:36:32 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 14QJaW46088220 for net@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 26 May 2021 19:36:32 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 230465] ixl: not working in netmap mode Date: Wed, 26 May 2021 19:36:31 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.1-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: IntelNetworking X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: vmaffione@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D230465 --- Comment #47 from Vincenzo Maffione --- What is the state of the TX ring (head, cur, tail) when stalling? --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From nobody Wed May 26 21:09:01 2021 X-Original-To: net@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E453ACF8FC8 for ; Wed, 26 May 2021 21:09:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Fr3Tn5xSwz4knT for ; Wed, 26 May 2021 21:09:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B48DD17D96 for ; Wed, 26 May 2021 21:09:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 14QL91AM038698 for ; Wed, 26 May 2021 21:09:01 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 14QL91Wa038697 for net@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 26 May 2021 21:09:01 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 256175] Network interface sk0 is periodically switched DOWN, then UP without apparent reason, correlated with network activity Date: Wed, 26 May 2021 21:09:01 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: linimon@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: assigned_to Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D256175 Mark Linimon changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|bugs@FreeBSD.org |net@FreeBSD.org --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From nobody Thu May 27 20:46:49 2021 X-Original-To: net@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71590CFE197 for ; Thu, 27 May 2021 20:46:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ben.rubson@gmx.com) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.15]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mout.gmx.net", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass Class 2 CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Frfxn0tBLz4qmB for ; Thu, 27 May 2021 20:46:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ben.rubson@gmx.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1622148411; bh=Hk7znSK6OC3kzxxxlRLcw0JasGftg1muNJG6fk5oROg=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:From:Subject:Date:To; b=WwqMsrCqupeGIuUoqW2Agyj4Na0jRTPCR6PvS+0zP0TzXHTJekP2Rsgu5+vx1LHqF QzBHeuXe0qiHUMRgJR2aJMLu6TA6l73IhLTAFPO7q/xOS5XpPs0bjNXfelZFqhfoAf H/TskhmxEEK6/WZfYqg2/wBKqx95PtasdUNPkGBk= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Received: from smtpclient.apple ([82.65.254.62]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx005 [212.227.17.184]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MtfJd-1lZ6ft447j-00vAmM for ; Thu, 27 May 2021 22:46:51 +0200 From: Ben RUBSON Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.100.0.2.22\)) Subject: Intel X722 + Inphi CS4227, FreeBSD support ? Message-Id: <6BC3E651-D892-4A03-B36E-C055B86E751D@gmx.com> Date: Thu, 27 May 2021 22:46:49 +0200 To: net@freebsd.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.100.0.2.22) X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:epHyaCgS2He1hBFYrnpCRdqz8auThPcVZpHubCJQ+s5Fz3DXSy+ x68rDYSMTO2ZsK49ECq4Wc6Lf8HuKoBFZc3NtZYGdeV8jFiK2hvA8f9E4UNKjKwIDxA6TP8 QNvSKcjm6TsP5Upi9P711ZJBlH2HBTCbo+mVpUo3rvowL6hwrgQP0cwFOzK4J+67iiqaeKx 04GtclACTBHeRsPzVRFug== X-Spam-Flag: NO X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:9tFiazI8UOI=:ondy9pruWyzsfPRawCvyS0 LwLpCpxvm6CrLwyvlAeP9cBPXEnlogBWtjv0wtRMwNBDVXYCUnzo4qmaYxHyFoV5/wb7k009p pLwjdSYoPjr/+oIZGwDdxlv9uqaBkUWvP9W1tFDyS0gFuovwcSbPu1ppkGspfDwzfbVoqm0iw dvAt59XvFkGKt0XU1o3Wd9LIr+8mK74v9Xcx1aA2x8/nkDIab7VhfTOgnemTgTUMP1Z93Egdt cCR9tIUAp1AuFEeU3sGfToD42R3IiAm76ybNnGJPG24HA6KbVrqD4O+5XglYUNgA88MT6SThv rfeKCZShG8/Xq0X3qu35e/tq8Th/SX6+G6wKWUhiRlvjrERc8/beKTQ8xy6JKo/2lNvNd15tD GwdOA+05+4DsmMnea1xH8NfPJ75SK/+iD1YpfOhpiAvYUsRhdE9vGdOfddK62tcdQwphvn2IU bRQEsq0MupHiW+ZkuzpGJdmittH76KsapFb3ttMZIXSTdMfqJVk009nO9EFpyHwuW6ZkcTo7M OFh+ZaVvl+Pl/begpGtbQ0TZ6jlio1/Wd/xAh+cXiL+MrXAbntvBA3meVNN5GPzDA4bEyeet/ CGL9xpoJo3LyeF0y2+SBE2cnL1wmWyii1YssmIebCA2FDuZBA8CP0s7T3yJgj329ZIv5X3G5y 2xAFuQvwG2FMJdKQyyr0GHGHyCgS7vYTOcFHymsBp036w+Ku8lywdxckZ5AKdcXzlc10hbep+ Uh0dwbbepsecrN+5aIHD6kO7fV55NvyeMQc/SMGmswJyw+BN9jirAlruRpxoFUnLkQdIBl0qb xcvYq1dkIiiQxt+6to3IjezsCbNmDNNCN53DQS+BNtdyPZhf3NBucpmxyDG+huIVm4ySHEiWQ 9yfYEAJSdYKGXzqV2tWRo6TneMqo/9/7a3EeRXUyDu+uZlA5LiVwxkVvn3073flo8eDXB7SLX nQ6X9TNi+fbHaqAOyvReptWRleyrOQAjd1CG690+cY8e5EY8hM6q7W7rrNPHsp36tmnUNCPKD jlHzAFjFMZo/SudaVOVTXL/fiFPNwAewFvvaEPXu+3H8uffDSH79LhSaGhnsLQibCy6vXbyuE n/j0sP4T4Np0rwtX0CN1fdyjkToGbqXZmC4Z1MjZ7FezYwJw2+5bvm349Lsce51vtajiFglOz I2V9OY4EF8FDPXovp5F//IaX1VmVjX+wxrCR8MO3/pSv1Uv7StpfAzTi2dTEqE6E9cmiE= X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Frfxn0tBLz4qmB X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmx.net header.s=badeba3b8450 header.b=WwqMsrCq; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmx.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of ben.rubson@gmx.com designates 212.227.15.15 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=ben.rubson@gmx.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.40 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_GOOD(0.00)[212.227.15.15:from]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmx.com]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:212.227.15.0/24]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmx.net:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmx.com,none]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.90)[-0.900]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmx.com]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[212.227.15.15:from]; ASN(0.00)[asn:8560, ipnet:212.227.0.0/16, country:DE]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmx.net:s=badeba3b8450]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[82.65.254.62:received]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[net@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[212.227.15.15:from:127.0.2.255]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[212.227.15.15:from]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[net] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N Hi, I'm looking at the Supermicro X11SPH-nCTPF motherboard. https://www.supermicro.com/en/products/motherboard/X11SPH-nCTPF Especially because of its SFP+ LAN adapter. Dual LAN with 10G SFP+ with Intel X722 + Inphi CS4227 (the PDF manual only shows Inphi CS4227) I did not find anything interesting about Inphi CS4227. And then I'm wondering about proper FreeBSD support. Anything to worry about ? Any experience sharing ? Many thanks, Kind regards, Ben From nobody Thu May 27 22:31:37 2021 X-Original-To: net@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C442FBF2BBE for ; Thu, 27 May 2021 22:31:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jeffrey.e.pieper@intel.com) Received: from mga17.intel.com (mga17.intel.com [192.55.52.151]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "fmsmga107.fm.intel.com", Issuer "Sectigo RSA Organization Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FrjGq2wdMz3Dl9 for ; Thu, 27 May 2021 22:31:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jeffrey.e.pieper@intel.com) IronPort-SDR: fAfDjbu9J6lC+Cd03OY4AyKdFWVnlwlSmXsERALyxWCWAxNiYn3OYBRDc2L7tZaVEWwGaSz9X6 XsgdXZGqXZMQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,9997"; a="183185592" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.83,228,1616482800"; d="scan'208";a="183185592" Received: from fmsmga003.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.29]) by fmsmga107.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 27 May 2021 15:31:43 -0700 IronPort-SDR: WjXEkRdiYReHMfKYARSoUY8F3RuAs/rxkXlS3PNMD1+Wql60zmNfJmw3HQe1kKjf5Bs+V3ooXB 0lfiF+vQw+VQ== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.83,228,1616482800"; d="scan'208";a="472767560" Received: from orsmsx602.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.22.229.15]) by FMSMGA003.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 27 May 2021 15:31:43 -0700 Received: from orsmsx612.amr.corp.intel.com (10.22.229.25) by ORSMSX602.amr.corp.intel.com (10.22.229.15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2242.4; Thu, 27 May 2021 15:31:43 -0700 Received: from orsmsx612.amr.corp.intel.com (10.22.229.25) by ORSMSX612.amr.corp.intel.com (10.22.229.25) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2242.4; Thu, 27 May 2021 15:31:42 -0700 Received: from orsedg603.ED.cps.intel.com (10.7.248.4) by orsmsx612.amr.corp.intel.com (10.22.229.25) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2242.4 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 27 May 2021 15:31:42 -0700 Received: from NAM12-BN8-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (104.47.55.174) by edgegateway.intel.com (134.134.137.100) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2242.4; Thu, 27 May 2021 15:31:38 -0700 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=SYJ0Rq9b9HnOwsgHuSJLfbe2bhcdUAPtvODS1OIAQsruTSA1IYi004XNDH1GHCpipfMG+53+rFPSFer6uQAkwnuf47HQUOrHNraj5cwNStI/TK7SBuFtCSBWidP6Oz3x2cI7OB+DA0lH+o95kD/2Fega2k+iG1Wi8Y4x34jB2QS9PWAIC392J3rZQkqgOpkZRDPyA6Z2OOELl55wySXDXWSvHcEyftKTipQtiGdYL9lUgNuzxmLGwL/JS6cej/rD3kD1FxnO+WTY7RMyJ003Dw7+T16BWVIIWpzOqCRaK9VNNHcQWotNk/8bLMklAllFgnqyPMZGIua1/jPBVmcIxA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=sS3u/f62555AMQ/bVMS5uSIBh1rol2n+jg8eXuv5IOI=; b=U+/rUW1yUezzIs5hpBw3nXxvMU6wKPRkRFISYfO3m0Y3GrzlH3vKxAZ3D88QmtKhqOyku1OSGQz5a45KoOxwMZxAFKST3K0Tr5gYPQ8j1NKHAuR7+Y+yQQttKB6U3reRIcLkcxS/13PzonTb9cla4E9bgmY3iI0qRcmCTjqAcZTOF0znwOxGp0aDi36FoUxzhsyACat1RJokT1I/mKYJo5FJBO1iAahqhe65q2farqgl8K83xY1iO0uvcnireFyOfOUZ5IYRiZ1L5GP9nO2gWh8EFoDw1CpN3cDqV7bKClbEbm84eSxjXEOZVFo/gQRj7gihNhXfBwQRuwmGBB36Zg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=intel.com; dkim=pass header.d=intel.com; arc=none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=intel.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-intel-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=sS3u/f62555AMQ/bVMS5uSIBh1rol2n+jg8eXuv5IOI=; b=piLhl2JIa3cGWxQdfPtOi63leE30qDQ9QCe/pAP1WWh4j32+MVacUoBrOAFAER7i81ux1S1eAZut6DAdKmDDjIkx5kDt5PI24peYzuU+F916finUd3xgWMkWaabCnP462vJaZ9brBAxeTw3rmZxetWlDtIebSd2m2wannVOq2pk= Received: from MWHPR1101MB2237.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:301:57::17) by MWHPR11MB1679.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:301:f::12) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.4173.21; Thu, 27 May 2021 22:31:37 +0000 Received: from MWHPR1101MB2237.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::2422:4312:fbf9:e6b7]) by MWHPR1101MB2237.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::2422:4312:fbf9:e6b7%6]) with mapi id 15.20.4150.027; Thu, 27 May 2021 22:31:37 +0000 From: "Pieper, Jeffrey E" To: Ben RUBSON , "net@freebsd.org" Subject: RE: Intel X722 + Inphi CS4227, FreeBSD support ? Thread-Topic: Intel X722 + Inphi CS4227, FreeBSD support ? Thread-Index: AQHXUzmFfq3Nl8tz7EyRBbKyQp0jv6r36O+Q Date: Thu, 27 May 2021 22:31:37 +0000 Message-ID: References: <6BC3E651-D892-4A03-B36E-C055B86E751D@gmx.com> In-Reply-To: <6BC3E651-D892-4A03-B36E-C055B86E751D@gmx.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: dlp-product: dlpe-windows dlp-reaction: no-action dlp-version: 11.5.1.3 x-originating-ip: [50.39.214.215] x-ms-publictraffictype: Email x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 2ee88653-ec93-4f8d-3b80-08d9215f30d4 x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: MWHPR11MB1679: x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:7219; x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1 x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 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 x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255;CTRY:;LANG:en;SCL:1;SRV:;IPV:NLI;SFV:NSPM;H:MWHPR1101MB2237.namprd11.prod.outlook.com;PTR:;CAT:NONE;SFS:(366004)(376002)(39860400002)(396003)(136003)(346002)(38100700002)(6506007)(7696005)(33656002)(53546011)(26005)(122000001)(186003)(55016002)(71200400001)(110136005)(86362001)(966005)(76116006)(66946007)(8936002)(8676002)(2906002)(52536014)(66556008)(64756008)(66476007)(5660300002)(9686003)(4744005)(66446008)(316002)(478600001)(83380400001);DIR:OUT;SFP:1102; x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: =?us-ascii?Q?Ou5ecOoYqCEuJBRRpw8BheJ6caQKbDlhW03p8ajUA+RnDPmvojV09EMAxksR?= =?us-ascii?Q?8yBHiwJpNsPSmHVqzzjoRLQp3oEFix7+fwYd0q/NEPEvmMBISHUiXfn9J6lD?= =?us-ascii?Q?Yu2uZIN+CHt0yyx5cS4DhfLsRggj00qNrrCHIYcuAdskkMeCyGBh7B4QQJaz?= =?us-ascii?Q?pTKe67DFnwifx4mIZzAW7ac9ln9IqpDsk6coS0N9Xx5vg6Zy0x6a6Ptop8ie?= =?us-ascii?Q?b2t+iwNTu69wGG5R6sTrMsHDJO6F2MHhkJf97VFaNUZW9C9VvHM2/wLiLGM6?= =?us-ascii?Q?bOmVQrBKNXm0XVnhSAwsKx1U1g8ROk6cCNFDD9u4rh5OztIyIEw7ZUaIOx5F?= =?us-ascii?Q?hBuDpdF6E4ESJMjNpHlXX8QeIcnXlXWR8j7O5iT+cYUWVUIEyurJ2v1wK56j?= =?us-ascii?Q?JutGiE8v7f3kIQqxDIwp3EW80Bb0NHqLy5xOhIiYQWm4DlSuXlp6SzpnP4SB?= =?us-ascii?Q?CdZ+e99rsaeTjjse9EW77n0K9LIagrqCgyNEsAxSWHXseMhdGyA3lSjfIH/K?= =?us-ascii?Q?r0vRDXvcSjSra3Qs+kLx+I3+Chz5sdQwVLE0ZE+E+3NFuIcHw5MBXDRaUlpE?= =?us-ascii?Q?n7TQm64mfDkQVP6gM/MGnbkhA4nSQrHEljjZZOL84bzMaFAVqI84jc0NGgvB?= =?us-ascii?Q?CyGgoU333B+/rjzBEsjndr49vfWpWX2iEsn8r7bzptlEexg1Mb5LWI0vBm1B?= =?us-ascii?Q?WQ2qpYQBSsgcsC8malE7lCZvfiNH4nXCpbxs/A0JZNKyZ5H/a6a12c2u18Dr?= =?us-ascii?Q?Ry7REcSMquaUzTQFbzdURcAx++a1pDtBEbFfkw/xK6mxBPXWClx2n3wJf2Ua?= =?us-ascii?Q?wyhvinb9ytQGvciaqAi+t7f/QiNXbYNJayVnkCOZqYLEaLhFMTKFFThtuce2?= =?us-ascii?Q?Im5WuPi4g+9og93XYiCX91shTJj3VrUmTO8YaY2y+inLG01JE/2vnEs2gds+?= =?us-ascii?Q?k4G6PllgJPPd4VjuEh86L6zZDnPYoqhbWZatYP9433Gm1aL4hY7RjZi6gmd+?= =?us-ascii?Q?Q0YrYrhJ9aPf/KF9sQnbqy4GhwR7YOXvURSjXcpr0vHDtjMFCfKmRXkirZ8H?= =?us-ascii?Q?vb9SoYMRTxZxIxS+KZUXH/HIAGMTlFTVo+6/b3bV2MzzcC5W4tAs/wXeEqnS?= =?us-ascii?Q?xtC4PeeseQy+RD4UiehDVwOqvq/dfJoqUQjWBJ5M53vHYoXfo0cNQPYsQst/?= =?us-ascii?Q?dQdAvZevyeNsFwA0ng2fzXy8lpYz/FixvzN7U0CH41YyWwvpyCaxV/L1IF5h?= =?us-ascii?Q?Lr5KUEdGq+tPCcIX56mSku8qI4zPf9vTT74Kp4i4CvGUZibutFOI/UQzU4Xs?= =?us-ascii?Q?2Pz2JLtxNuloO3LDA4uVW/5Z?= x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: MWHPR1101MB2237.namprd11.prod.outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 2ee88653-ec93-4f8d-3b80-08d9215f30d4 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 27 May 2021 22:31:37.3251 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 46c98d88-e344-4ed4-8496-4ed7712e255d X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: AM+KQ8qomcHhcQNqUhzp6r0b2Bu9JdS/aC4Ct8QEeQRjXxxP0tHvm5M7A0AxZjfuefrxabPRhjXGQiyA5I8sWqFyAHgB15DmYVEOzNcRJj4= X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: MWHPR11MB1679 X-OriginatorOrg: intel.com X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FrjGq2wdMz3Dl9 X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N The ixl driver already supports X722. Inphi CS4227 is a Cortina PHY which i= xl also supports.=20 Thanks, Jeff > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org > On Behalf Of Ben RUBSON > Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2021 1:47 PM > To: net@freebsd.org > Subject: Intel X722 + Inphi CS4227, FreeBSD support ? >=20 > Hi, >=20 > I'm looking at the Supermicro X11SPH-nCTPF motherboard. > https://www.supermicro.com/en/products/motherboard/X11SPH-nCTPF > Especially because of its SFP+ LAN adapter. >=20 > Dual LAN with 10G SFP+ with Intel X722 + Inphi CS4227 (the PDF manual onl= y > shows Inphi CS4227) >=20 > I did not find anything interesting about Inphi CS4227. > And then I'm wondering about proper FreeBSD support. >=20 > Anything to worry about ? > Any experience sharing ? >=20 > Many thanks, >=20 > Kind regards, >=20 > Ben >=20 From nobody Fri May 28 06:28:35 2021 X-Original-To: net@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC404C7CD13 for ; Fri, 28 May 2021 06:28:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Frvrz4JNlz4QtG for ; Fri, 28 May 2021 06:28:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7CE3312791 for ; Fri, 28 May 2021 06:28:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 14S6SZmU067735 for ; Fri, 28 May 2021 06:28:35 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 14S6SZfc067734 for net@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 28 May 2021 06:28:35 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 236119] Intel Ethernet 82547 device cannot transfer data Date: Fri, 28 May 2021 06:28:35 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: IntelNetworking, regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: kbowling@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: kbowling@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: mfc-stable13+ mfc-stable12+ mfc-stable11- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: resolution bug_status flagtypes.name Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D236119 Kevin Bowling changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|In Progress |Closed Flags|mfc-stable13?, |mfc-stable13+, |mfc-stable12? |mfc-stable12+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Bowling --- No MFC needed for stable11 it has a different driver. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From nobody Fri May 28 06:50:50 2021 X-Original-To: net@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F700C7E462 for ; Fri, 28 May 2021 06:50:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ben.rubson@gmx.com) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.22]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mout.gmx.net", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass Class 2 CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FrwLh3QLnz4Sd6 for ; Fri, 28 May 2021 06:50:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ben.rubson@gmx.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1622184650; bh=vmxszIuhmhiJCoImtGkzstQSRK41nY0tb7nGRnpEG6U=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:From:Subject:Date:References:To:In-Reply-To; b=iH6KiNRJjz1zX96Z5jCslrt7GYjJwNZ1gpImmO8gnavGKpkh5B3N0Co8RTJhaYZv6 CvanwTx3Hye98xPaAjZjOu2RXWhEmKzwTz8c0IBVoZ0U/zklUdwO8Y8r8soOupdydR iPmw11rWGKSvjyFEWHUAuGaau3h93vVCKwk9Vatc= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Received: from smtpclient.apple ([185.101.28.209]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx104 [212.227.17.174]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MRTRN-1m19RP2DsT-00NNoK for ; Fri, 28 May 2021 08:50:50 +0200 From: Ben RUBSON Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.100.0.2.22\)) Subject: Re: Intel X722 + Inphi CS4227, FreeBSD support ? Date: Fri, 28 May 2021 08:50:50 +0200 References: <6BC3E651-D892-4A03-B36E-C055B86E751D@gmx.com> To: "net@freebsd.org" In-Reply-To: Message-Id: <70217477-3617-48C4-92F5-B1DB412604B1@gmx.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.100.0.2.22) X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:fnEMwNZst7wF/g2l5TXWQtD6hQlLWhZS8Wii8wSzfaOUkNfVivc O812VDLYQErniFs1+9jesL2rY5Uq2XnshiSsy5qXNF+LleVVmOnYeH0F3ivC8n2t8k5UGzK 1NuMLk/pc61O9vLqe3S2zxR4/6U0Hzz/zVsBMCdMvG8GdmO+Zw6y3zJCcfqOLqCJT073LVB s5IGVVEBl9jzCRAGBevSg== X-Spam-Flag: NO X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:WCLzq9tbWfw=:HyHdQMpIGajKqdDERpF3QV +18O9Ky/Sp9GQgf0I5GkeQJIROhM9DBB7PeiiVY9xf08sepJ44yf92WunFWBUkdgXfYuul8oB gpqV0NRUu7XnNRzEWMLzYvH2Gb2Yc/LiwL76qZp+JrPGDwzqLjspPGuB3D8lU8l8612ILe9ja YTdDMoC9ZPY7/SefZnrrKMZlCmCTQ7QyTUCwF9LkkVoMEVPNGuiX3kfBR6DfgLzCq3i/8zp/f 9TcCc4c9Fymnd9K4h/EH0d6HtZbcy8/n44wDHqfCBmGTUL/SdL+nBk8XA/+Z/L4ikZuY9IGAd U5nUdDjrACptkp2QWr536yaTXEa3AFiLZO8cZHNVQ/P+dYLrFFZOj67CUIqaQxW1tW7KmX7vX Mf0R43kdq9M4gvRCa4xCRVplMksVSK1Tg2m1/6CliT7GKl8h30PJxwUr+z7eAO6MUgZnMf2BW nMvJS7OBE3J/2UrON+L0jIs+GPV2XS/ktYnldd/h6FviMDkVeJYzh+IMHw8cGmu2JX27oh/cO BZ1EJk7VyX/eNZKcAZAovCKqDR8exaexklFKy20A/aW8nnWHoHVmTkVVvOwdSo8z1jg0zoBkd xqzNbelw7kfN0oVUrqSE3FXu4FKcoc6VIYDwojbE8gaktzoJhl846jULZe8MYzh4f9k6NXG6G K2Z3JFIETKmoZ2Hryp2FJh5zXZZuFCwSRstsZ3eyp0JjT3xP29MHg4dY35IH3Sxj+4555HPlK tHDxhw2aS0WLcumOXI0kAxpOpkAhnay743Of2vwR5SYTEaIUpFvWgh7ueKZYGcQW9A7Fc2Qf1 GjnBsL7jFnvRR1CpcJRe61yGpULLs8GYCSivbhhRM9armUwHKP4Z0YeImhvyJYYkEPVIFJGdG VtMG+8CBEbRnTiz85IaGbH2k6yTREF8M75XSXWs8ri+fzmGyNlH6e08mVx4/1OLsbip0cBglY VVcGUK4otg0Ays2dTMOnVs25IETuMsvxmBBAaRrH5GARNw/xJ3WlBUp1ZqjTzDpCEj5oA3BXr VYJgEQ2ATy4tgbzIUDGzdbSzGmUWUhG8oGLszR5Ma8oHetgswkd6O4oS9lONjED3cjEr7Dxhe kUP553X7LOUT6UpWwKwR+hD4Hf4GZAyfeRyPWORgm5+jF1UD/ZQVVdYNddUSwBpQjQ8SrXjTG +X5WITdYwrsL2hCk8TiXRz9lZNUCSfD1pwfHwjN3zFKGJXCuZKoMuMibbE1ZiDfoxzfAk= X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FrwLh3QLnz4Sd6 X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmx.net header.s=badeba3b8450 header.b=iH6KiNRJ; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmx.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of ben.rubson@gmx.com designates 212.227.17.22 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=ben.rubson@gmx.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.60 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:212.227.17.0/27]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmx.com]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmx.net:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmx.com,none]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-0.997]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[212.227.17.22:from]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmx.com]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:8560, ipnet:212.227.0.0/16, country:DE]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmx.net:s=badeba3b8450]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[net@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_ALL(0.00)[]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_VERYGOOD(0.00)[212.227.17.22:from]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[net] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N Pretty good news, many thanks Jeff ! > On 28 May 2021, at 00:31, Pieper, Jeffrey E = wrote: >=20 > The ixl driver already supports X722. Inphi CS4227 is a Cortina PHY = which ixl also supports.=20 >=20 > Thanks, > Jeff >=20 >> -----Original Message----- >> From: owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org >> On Behalf Of Ben RUBSON >> Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2021 1:47 PM >> To: net@freebsd.org >> Subject: Intel X722 + Inphi CS4227, FreeBSD support ? >>=20 >> Hi, >>=20 >> I'm looking at the Supermicro X11SPH-nCTPF motherboard. >> https://www.supermicro.com/en/products/motherboard/X11SPH-nCTPF >> Especially because of its SFP+ LAN adapter. >>=20 >> Dual LAN with 10G SFP+ with Intel X722 + Inphi CS4227 (the PDF manual = only >> shows Inphi CS4227) >>=20 >> I did not find anything interesting about Inphi CS4227. >> And then I'm wondering about proper FreeBSD support. >>=20 >> Anything to worry about ? >> Any experience sharing ? >>=20 >> Many thanks, >>=20 >> Kind regards, >>=20 >> Ben >>=20 >=20 >=20 From nobody Fri May 28 17:01:29 2021 X-Original-To: net@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB9DABFEE40 for ; Fri, 28 May 2021 17:01:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Fs9vG1Rbmz3phZ for ; Fri, 28 May 2021 17:01:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F20561A771 for ; Fri, 28 May 2021 17:01:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 14SH1TKM016404 for ; Fri, 28 May 2021 17:01:29 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 14SH1TSo016402 for net@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 28 May 2021 17:01:29 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 256217] [tcp] High system load because of interrupts with RACK Date: Fri, 28 May 2021 17:01:29 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: linimon@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: assigned_to Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D256217 Mark Linimon changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|bugs@FreeBSD.org |net@FreeBSD.org --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From nobody Fri May 28 17:42:30 2021 X-Original-To: net@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D86ADC7ADD8 for ; Fri, 28 May 2021 17:42:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FsBpb5kx4z3w3B for ; Fri, 28 May 2021 17:42:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ADD331B897 for ; Fri, 28 May 2021 17:42:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 14SHgVcf059147 for ; Fri, 28 May 2021 17:42:31 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 14SHgV0E059146 for net@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 28 May 2021 17:42:31 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 256217] [tcp] High system load because of interrupts with RACK Date: Fri, 28 May 2021 17:42:30 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: tuexen@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D256217 --- Comment #4 from Michael Tuexen --- So loading the RACK module, but not loading it, does not trigger the issue. Getting rid of all RACK based TCP connections seems to resolve the issue. Can you do the following experiment? 1) Load RACK and use net.inet.tcp.functions_default=3Dfreebsd at boot time.= You should not experience the problem. 2) Switch the stack for new connections to RACK by using sysctl net.inet.tcp.functions_default=3Drack. You can check the stack being used by using sockstat -SPtcp. The problem should now show up once new connections = are established. 3) Switch the stack for new connections to the base stack by using sysctl net.inet.tcp.functions_default=3Dfreebsd. Either wait until the connections= using RACK have been closed or kill them by using tcpdrop -S rack. This should resolve the issue. If the behaviour is as I think it is, the problem is only there if you have active RACK connections. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From nobody Fri May 28 19:00:15 2021 X-Original-To: net@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A7E2D784F5 for ; Fri, 28 May 2021 19:00:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FsDXH2qCRz4YHP for ; Fri, 28 May 2021 19:00:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44F681C894 for ; Fri, 28 May 2021 19:00:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 14SJ0FKq034154 for ; Fri, 28 May 2021 19:00:15 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 14SJ0FSC034153 for net@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 28 May 2021 19:00:15 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 256217] [tcp] High system load because of interrupts with RACK Date: Fri, 28 May 2021 19:00:15 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: chris@cretaforce.gr X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D256217 --- Comment #5 from Christos Chatzaras --- To avoid reboot I did this which I believe is the same: sysctl net.inet.tcp.functions_default net.inet.tcp.functions_default: freebsd kldload tcp_rack sysctl net.inet.tcp.functions_default=3Drack I restart all services so new connections (mostly nginx) use "rack". I wait for few minutes and interrupts increase to ~5% sysctl net.inet.tcp.functions_default=3Dfreebsd tcpdrop -S rack Interrupts decrease to ~ 0.3% (looks like less connections =3D less interru= pts) New connections still use "rack", so I restart again all services. Now all connections use "freebsd" and interrupts decrease to ~ 0.0% ---- Also something I notice is that during the issue if I run "sysctl kern.eventtimer.timer=3DHPET" then interrupts immediately increase. If I run "sysctl kern.eventtimer.timer=3DLAPIC" the interrupts immediately decrease. ---- So it looks like that active rack connections cause the issue. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From nobody Fri May 28 19:21:51 2021 X-Original-To: net@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 204FFD7AD4B for ; Fri, 28 May 2021 19:21:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FsF1C0Mx5z4c8r for ; Fri, 28 May 2021 19:21:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E9D441CD82 for ; Fri, 28 May 2021 19:21:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 14SJLo1X056272 for ; Fri, 28 May 2021 19:21:50 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 14SJLoSh056271 for net@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 28 May 2021 19:21:50 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 256217] [tcp] High system load because of interrupts with RACK Date: Fri, 28 May 2021 19:21:51 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: tuexen@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D256217 --- Comment #6 from Michael Tuexen --- (In reply to Christos Chatzaras from comment #5) Thanks for testing, I guess you confirmed what I assumed is causing the behaviour. I have no idea why this happens and if it is sort of expected or not. I'll = try to reproduce it locally and will report. I'll also bring it up on a biweekly transport call. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From nobody Fri May 28 21:40:26 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-net@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6692FDB95A8 for ; Fri, 28 May 2021 21:40:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bakul@iitbombay.org) Received: from mail-ot1-x32a.google.com (mail-ot1-x32a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::32a]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FsJ594n6wz4my1 for ; Fri, 28 May 2021 21:40:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bakul@iitbombay.org) Received: by mail-ot1-x32a.google.com with SMTP id u25-20020a0568302319b02902ac3d54c25eso4835289ote.1 for ; Fri, 28 May 2021 14:40:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iitbombay-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:mime-version:subject:message-id:date:to; bh=0A4MgaRmWUHNKl70azkxmlRxCI+jW9GWS0MXM2KPIis=; b=XJCReu1kWNkZUB6fTvBD+k1617WZNw4OqSOsx6Y9JBzOevtjLTE+oTmt8SNJ5hGthH xmX6eox6RaDWEDPZiKYS6xszZy2ETl9zsogOIN1x43tl+WGMWCUqqsQp1E4ZJfC+cGkx zW1SIoDE1dLYxzAl+YG86wOnNNw4ZE1Xz+S4+o2H1NBH/KzRiCZBJzEI413CJ/yOkU9q Q/Bumm7v979N0ZBroklK20hHIOw905nKmTU9xPaQ6oZsJhaimtx4j6Fkt0XaKcAF173N cuwzxCBa2na1I3OVeZtb6st4nP9cIMSCeBCORbR++xE0QkPIStv2fd8uwhHF0QU0c/VX uXpg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:mime-version:subject:message-id:date:to; bh=0A4MgaRmWUHNKl70azkxmlRxCI+jW9GWS0MXM2KPIis=; b=U+x8Lvj0ZqFEz17O7hQvuB/l1bUBgveN3KDBl8mqbRlExhtIgq+tNO2n463ZnHkomt ehKJ0K1WkkuQQ3ATIKrBU+M7klORU9kJBo0UfKGPd46uVCyfRfefN3fS1YthBqlP4TKq VLKR3tbg1DTHU3vUh4mBRy7HlgnE+8Fz63aOKes1UjKTb7hQsD0WcSRswItU9jz4RuM/ XkkX061DhM5w4/DZQTJCzn8zuhiWLaH4PgQQCSi6UR1bM97U0QPHY1C3aNDEj9BwA92A 3SBBwi1pKFCd1WK67Yjo0E+rTQ7WNZ9scE8IPTR6+aF97BDFqkxMHltmLT5OqVdJZDeU Hflg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5313DZSiaAWs46lhytmEgdbdmjbT/WdVTY8yaDldDHOHGVex+4ur yM9azcayZZuDGdn5lhaBoZpQSiZNvxSNHRUy X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJztkk/odOm6rwojlY/hyX2p6EonONa9i3Dzi47lcKilecmXqaj2uJkk/iWpxUk6/pb9o0//vA== X-Received: by 2002:a9d:4911:: with SMTP id e17mr8802827otf.38.1622238028047; Fri, 28 May 2021 14:40:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtpclient.apple (107-215-223-229.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net. [107.215.223.229]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z9sm1367097oti.37.2021.05.28.14.40.27 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 28 May 2021 14:40:27 -0700 (PDT) From: Bakul Shah Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_4D4E7E14-7192-483F-AD71-C5F2492D91AA" List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.80.0.2.43\)) Subject: bind(2) fails on 13.0-STABLE when sin_family is 0 Message-Id: Date: Fri, 28 May 2021 14:40:26 -0700 To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.80.0.2.43) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FsJ594n6wz4my1 X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=iitbombay-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=XJCReu1k; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of bakul@iitbombay.org designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::32a as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bakul@iitbombay.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.00 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[iitbombay-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com:+]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::32a:from]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[iitbombay-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com:s=20150623]; FREEFALL_USER(0.00)[bakul]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-net@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[iitbombay.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::32a:from:127.0.2.255]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::32a:from]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-net] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: Y --Apple-Mail=_4D4E7E14-7192-483F-AD71-C5F2492D91AA Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii ttcp runs fine on 13.0-RELEASE but fails on -stable. The culprit seems to be bind(2). Running ttcp under gdb: $ gdb a.out Reading symbols from a.out... (gdb) b 295 Breakpoint 1 at 0x203127: file ttcp.c, line 295. (gdb) run -s -r Starting program: /usr/ports/benchmarks/ttcp/work/ttcp-1.12_2/a.out -s = -r ttcp-r: buflen=3D8192, nbuf=3D2048, align=3D16384/0, port=3D5001 tcp ttcp-r: socket Breakpoint 1, main (argc=3D3, argv=3D0x7fffffffd9b0) at ttcp.c:295 295 if (bind(fd, (struct sockaddr *) &sinme, sizeof(sinme)) = < 0) (gdb) p/x sinme $1 =3D {sin_len =3D 0x0, sin_family =3D 0x0, sin_port =3D 0x8913, = sin_addr =3D { s_addr =3D 0x0}, sin_zero =3D {0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, = 0x0}} (gdb) n 296 err("bind"); (gdb) p errno $2 =3D 47 $ errno 47 #define EAFNOSUPPORT 47 /* Address family not supported = by protocol family */ Did something change post 13.0-RELEASE that requires specifying = sin_family? Thanks! -- Bakul --Apple-Mail=_4D4E7E14-7192-483F-AD71-C5F2492D91AA-- From nobody Fri May 28 22:12:40 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-net@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3EDFDBB388 for ; Fri, 28 May 2021 22:12:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from markjdb@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qt1-x82c.google.com (mail-qt1-x82c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::82c]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FsJpK4vy2z4pZ4 for ; Fri, 28 May 2021 22:12:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from markjdb@gmail.com) Received: by mail-qt1-x82c.google.com with SMTP id h21so3819175qtu.5 for ; Fri, 28 May 2021 15:12:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=3zpeH0E86wMA0iMUXagyGpOMK9uNA1A84C1sdcFs+Ko=; b=ZawUW83VwhJEZHSNvOSfaLdnXJ4tbRTIyePYgmaZiRz/V+TuudpydPLcuVS+xJwew5 dXBJjw0a4ESV5y0ArB3eWS0ECuyzy0HIsr3TYS3KEpDoYw0aKfSo6f5+kb8mGQWDWF0v 57Nb82dFA0ufjQxHYs0PJskGTbHm0gOqAC63e3vH0LCsVerJe4D4BEayRb6cbu9E/E6G wG7hTF9udyxCAOE4yTF0ST9F1cPyoWIvPJ7lEJKLLkUJtzM+I2d0Z8zDQTIM4gAX+dP5 q1myRhnLU+xjcdHX5NTRMpDX0+2/F/hZidZRqwub9V8vLdp00m/2i6FE+l5lfSCdIKeC DnYg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=3zpeH0E86wMA0iMUXagyGpOMK9uNA1A84C1sdcFs+Ko=; b=j2hZ5Z7ZKsptRCvWSVXI41ok4n0VhlUOy8MwP5CX8UKg8I8vd1wuwYF5CguUSgJx7o 34jDZYvHYScv/B+nTI/R5z9IJLzScAVUOR/1EAfb7DC0zRnw2453J92DR2xwNa/hStQc /O2CrzfbGUatiVSBmHRDsFDIIM+CfuswWefwjA06qk6Eu8Gi1VkXs+I57YaGFngwLcuq yzKCXP7QElRDA1p3e/X2FxSDLxAPVDl0xHVFwgtf57K5IgdsHtxYKQq7LQu/61ES/JvM uEK2ceuPw+iwgdCo5z4sCc2vLrolfRThpnaC/bHvcKUHT1++lGi77939+pXvFC6fJVEW nwCA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532wWs7/HiNaMUJhI8MuKaIIqa5oXkQrpEn8G4qPFz+LH6TgdqAV T2RmGKpph/qHzqcm3yg/0gCg+MpVR4A= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy6QRfocWZYWQLdOn8yq2Gat1KiXhz1jp+dfIpD7K6tVzYO18k74BdJvgUCWpiOU8M0e9tPwQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:289:: with SMTP id z9mr5514875qtw.325.1622239960620; Fri, 28 May 2021 15:12:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nuc ([142.126.172.178]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r23sm4170183qtc.32.2021.05.28.15.12.39 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 28 May 2021 15:12:40 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 28 May 2021 18:12:40 -0400 From: Mark Johnston To: Bakul Shah Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bind(2) fails on 13.0-STABLE when sin_family is 0 Message-ID: References: List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FsJpK4vy2z4pZ4 X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 02:40:26PM -0700, Bakul Shah wrote: > ttcp runs fine on 13.0-RELEASE but fails on -stable. > > The culprit seems to be bind(2). Running ttcp under gdb: > > $ gdb a.out > Reading symbols from a.out... > (gdb) b 295 > Breakpoint 1 at 0x203127: file ttcp.c, line 295. > (gdb) run -s -r > Starting program: /usr/ports/benchmarks/ttcp/work/ttcp-1.12_2/a.out -s -r > ttcp-r: buflen=8192, nbuf=2048, align=16384/0, port=5001 tcp > ttcp-r: socket > > Breakpoint 1, main (argc=3, argv=0x7fffffffd9b0) at ttcp.c:295 > 295 if (bind(fd, (struct sockaddr *) &sinme, sizeof(sinme)) < 0) > (gdb) p/x sinme > $1 = {sin_len = 0x0, sin_family = 0x0, sin_port = 0x8913, sin_addr = { > s_addr = 0x0}, sin_zero = {0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0}} > (gdb) n > 296 err("bind"); > (gdb) p errno > $2 = 47 > > > $ errno 47 > #define EAFNOSUPPORT 47 /* Address family not supported by protocol family */ > > Did something change post 13.0-RELEASE that requires specifying sin_family? > Thanks! Yes, some changes were made recently to make sockaddr validation stricter. Several other operating systems also have this requirement. Linux seems to be a bit more relaxed in that AF_UNSPEC (0) is permitted if and only if the bind address is INADDR_ANY, which is the case here. Since 2001 the benchmarks/ttcp port has carried a patch to specify sin_family. Is there some reason it cannot be used here? I don't object to re-allowing ttcp's unpatched behaviour if necessary. From nobody Fri May 28 22:21:15 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-net@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9DB9DBBE71 for ; Fri, 28 May 2021 22:21:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bakul@iitbombay.org) Received: from mail-oi1-x22e.google.com (mail-oi1-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::22e]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FsK0G4gW5z4qwF for ; Fri, 28 May 2021 22:21:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bakul@iitbombay.org) Received: by mail-oi1-x22e.google.com with SMTP id t24so5742195oiw.3 for ; Fri, 28 May 2021 15:21:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iitbombay-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=EnewkOkI+6f+U3vxN/pRa+GETg5p2nKyF+zWOKDYRWI=; b=yM1I0pjBEB+tyK2SMLLA/oEWRLiqam9eJR8exANHH1FqEhfO8bR5ND0oL/mQGSAizq 4OP0sg4RtuTdp8UAlNl5RQTscZ41lAlawYTFJUTN2jyrGIgJxBlP9opGy7o/BqG2pKt5 TyJx7jZt2oK4EFRRyPiVLsTfPuvTQPUox2mo6h196GeJb40AknJ5Y2BEXrjF3sSSCAxw +WRCZAKQKZqUkUlZrf2bvimetskjA7l8cY2/2TgQrvBKLW8AQjVbMB/juJlpTl616cTt nzQLBTsM6E/5s5Ia5EVK9cmGbmbIvmUbd+JC4AaT6zgvGnSklq2HpLKnypa/qd1ujuit pGaQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=EnewkOkI+6f+U3vxN/pRa+GETg5p2nKyF+zWOKDYRWI=; b=W6qCt9OP8qsUrRw9LbVYgOXtAMRejdrar0y2Skm3ogYK/eM1em4o2OyQPTNSPEa36T KcTYIBhIUNlOzGapdFFFUZUgBqieIBBDNidDSZS7/dZiJawLW2fHuoReAWCW3pJFQT3R fXCYT81D2Tl06mAcalTnL8kBUeu9p8LxHZrdW4pfk23moz7B4CfUosEUjVlpM5yawAmS K2J8Kw5/9eU8A0Zj/O4ge4HykTTK9BUyfWJpGf6PtYlOX94V6Q2V2NaCCxPlPtOjaXne BhawU+j/XPst8XFD8fNqKtL2b4P0h/nKg9iyRzyW9winRJI8m/ijn8aVsrw/3USr6/PQ 1hFw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532zkRiLjtQfvsAuX0+cTF/3r5lHlmNu/UomAJtw8nHjEFMSs7Dx 5mwk73sY6J2i9zHe/KwpABBvsqGLHmbUSYWd X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxm0qH+9fBatB81Zy6URf1aXWYi206ZX6GEkBD1UvuNRx944fU4fOhcimv2UA6WYtN2FFNNng== X-Received: by 2002:aca:bd42:: with SMTP id n63mr323358oif.73.1622240477420; Fri, 28 May 2021 15:21:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtpclient.apple (107-215-223-229.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net. [107.215.223.229]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t22sm1459320otd.25.2021.05.28.15.21.16 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 28 May 2021 15:21:16 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.80.0.2.43\)) Subject: Re: bind(2) fails on 13.0-STABLE when sin_family is 0 From: Bakul Shah In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 28 May 2021 15:21:15 -0700 Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <9CF9F43D-CEB5-4856-AC1E-455DFE66DC69@iitbombay.org> References: To: Mark Johnston X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.80.0.2.43) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FsK0G4gW5z4qwF X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N On May 28, 2021, at 3:12 PM, Mark Johnston wrote: >=20 > On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 02:40:26PM -0700, Bakul Shah wrote: >> ttcp runs fine on 13.0-RELEASE but fails on -stable. >>=20 >> The culprit seems to be bind(2). Running ttcp under gdb: >>=20 >> $ gdb a.out >> Reading symbols from a.out... >> (gdb) b 295 >> Breakpoint 1 at 0x203127: file ttcp.c, line 295. >> (gdb) run -s -r >> Starting program: /usr/ports/benchmarks/ttcp/work/ttcp-1.12_2/a.out = -s -r >> ttcp-r: buflen=3D8192, nbuf=3D2048, align=3D16384/0, port=3D5001 tcp >> ttcp-r: socket >>=20 >> Breakpoint 1, main (argc=3D3, argv=3D0x7fffffffd9b0) at ttcp.c:295 >> 295 if (bind(fd, (struct sockaddr *) &sinme, = sizeof(sinme)) < 0) >> (gdb) p/x sinme >> $1 =3D {sin_len =3D 0x0, sin_family =3D 0x0, sin_port =3D 0x8913, = sin_addr =3D { >> s_addr =3D 0x0}, sin_zero =3D {0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, = 0x0}} >> (gdb) n >> 296 err("bind"); >> (gdb) p errno >> $2 =3D 47 >>=20 >>=20 >> $ errno 47 >> #define EAFNOSUPPORT 47 /* Address family not = supported by protocol family */ >>=20 >> Did something change post 13.0-RELEASE that requires specifying = sin_family? >> Thanks! >=20 > Yes, some changes were made recently to make sockaddr validation > stricter. Several other operating systems also have this requirement. > Linux seems to be a bit more relaxed in that AF_UNSPEC (0) is = permitted > if and only if the bind address is INADDR_ANY, which is the case here. >=20 > Since 2001 the benchmarks/ttcp port has carried a patch to specify > sin_family. Is there some reason it cannot be used here? I don't > object to re-allowing ttcp's unpatched behaviour if necessary. The patch was only for the transmit case. Making it unconditional fixed = it. I asked mainly because I was surprised and wanted to make sure this was = an intended change. Thanks for your response! -- Bakul= From nobody Fri May 28 22:43:02 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-net@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07F45DBD48B for ; Fri, 28 May 2021 22:43:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from markjdb@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qk1-x72a.google.com (mail-qk1-x72a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::72a]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FsKTL6bv9z4sKb for ; Fri, 28 May 2021 22:43:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from markjdb@gmail.com) Received: by mail-qk1-x72a.google.com with SMTP id c124so927744qkd.8 for ; Fri, 28 May 2021 15:43:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=o40ETJivjOU5wDdV9rYij7RnmDRexZMaNj04PdFPxCw=; b=DmlnwuQn7QxkNUkLtYQkEuYqn4QLkvrQNjz+sCSZwQSErhJlNS16m466/ltYdmnZiA jn9siUzEpX+RHcs7QrfvzqCks+gr0qp0VkW1qhBwEghpOSEy2sEv9pgox0oVNufh50gp +JNpL3fP1tXO5oM6M2W659MlhGlaohTVyzk4ZTaATbrlUvY3dp3ZbCFQss6trwqap4vm 3Gu6NmTIbp5j2hPFJ8DDp5BGDAI3LaOnCQUzNXStwGkwBqMmUgmASSVpAssoH34fHJO7 H3gVJSbfuSLpZ8Kw0gBMMwps/CU+1WqaTCXF8mcqEu3dwHalkBK9G8jWkHFeqUCHpjnc U2HQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=o40ETJivjOU5wDdV9rYij7RnmDRexZMaNj04PdFPxCw=; b=LL4GuEeCWoe1pXEWokOKDR0HgfgwgoRucjPX3iIGDmwGwoM5sWVkzlqnGpRkl4GA7W d895G7AB3GeMiyC5yWyDBP3sEdCuccUBPwInIjglyZ0tBBWJO4zmVLe5dZ8V1r0WRC1/ YSG/juM9qspeIqhg87QrHL9UrRwNmh5CzahqDUUCmOIZbhh2BuZuVB39Is88KSidUKOD ZIcpGygLjua3yOwiNcvHwbt9d89A6TWtTkUAHJou9eZ0q2yfQg5UYUDO1668L8JXIVeq XEJ8VjKW0FUs/d3yNOuVggQ5on4iNKb0S35scRyjwxtl3+00YxbWV4OVAGl7MPkybB9H kOXQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532ky4/9h8q25ut35YjQPQF0yFl0KRSwryd5k+JFkYgg2KZUN9b5 CwTYHjsnXZpSoeELXWZuv1Xt0h+X3zo= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyVKKBocjm5a0VEp0Ymy+KH2t+CWbBzeCNlm3ojDZjrXCptq0nKiO6vnFsGmZzTmskYaf/c5w== X-Received: by 2002:a37:9c15:: with SMTP id f21mr6258493qke.128.1622241782027; Fri, 28 May 2021 15:43:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nuc ([142.126.172.178]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p16sm2847275qtq.79.2021.05.28.15.43.01 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 28 May 2021 15:43:01 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 28 May 2021 18:43:02 -0400 From: Mark Johnston To: Bakul Shah Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bind(2) fails on 13.0-STABLE when sin_family is 0 Message-ID: References: <9CF9F43D-CEB5-4856-AC1E-455DFE66DC69@iitbombay.org> List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <9CF9F43D-CEB5-4856-AC1E-455DFE66DC69@iitbombay.org> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FsKTL6bv9z4sKb X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 03:21:15PM -0700, Bakul Shah wrote: > On May 28, 2021, at 3:12 PM, Mark Johnston wrote: > > > > On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 02:40:26PM -0700, Bakul Shah wrote: > >> ttcp runs fine on 13.0-RELEASE but fails on -stable. > >> > >> The culprit seems to be bind(2). Running ttcp under gdb: > >> > >> $ gdb a.out > >> Reading symbols from a.out... > >> (gdb) b 295 > >> Breakpoint 1 at 0x203127: file ttcp.c, line 295. > >> (gdb) run -s -r > >> Starting program: /usr/ports/benchmarks/ttcp/work/ttcp-1.12_2/a.out -s -r > >> ttcp-r: buflen=8192, nbuf=2048, align=16384/0, port=5001 tcp > >> ttcp-r: socket > >> > >> Breakpoint 1, main (argc=3, argv=0x7fffffffd9b0) at ttcp.c:295 > >> 295 if (bind(fd, (struct sockaddr *) &sinme, sizeof(sinme)) < 0) > >> (gdb) p/x sinme > >> $1 = {sin_len = 0x0, sin_family = 0x0, sin_port = 0x8913, sin_addr = { > >> s_addr = 0x0}, sin_zero = {0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0}} > >> (gdb) n > >> 296 err("bind"); > >> (gdb) p errno > >> $2 = 47 > >> > >> > >> $ errno 47 > >> #define EAFNOSUPPORT 47 /* Address family not supported by protocol family */ > >> > >> Did something change post 13.0-RELEASE that requires specifying sin_family? > >> Thanks! > > > > Yes, some changes were made recently to make sockaddr validation > > stricter. Several other operating systems also have this requirement. > > Linux seems to be a bit more relaxed in that AF_UNSPEC (0) is permitted > > if and only if the bind address is INADDR_ANY, which is the case here. > > > > Since 2001 the benchmarks/ttcp port has carried a patch to specify > > sin_family. Is there some reason it cannot be used here? I don't > > object to re-allowing ttcp's unpatched behaviour if necessary. > > The patch was only for the transmit case. Making it unconditional fixed it. > I asked mainly because I was surprised and wanted to make sure this was an > intended change. > > Thanks for your response! I see, thanks. In that case it is probably best to restore some level of compatibility: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D30539 From nobody Sat May 29 09:52:34 2021 X-Original-To: net@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 783A9D786E6 for ; Sat, 29 May 2021 09:52:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FscKv2w3mz4Zvl for ; Sat, 29 May 2021 09:52:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C83B27E57 for ; Sat, 29 May 2021 09:52:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 14T9qZiK041338 for ; Sat, 29 May 2021 09:52:35 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 14T9qZ7l041337 for net@FreeBSD.org; Sat, 29 May 2021 09:52:35 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 256217] [tcp] High system load because of interrupts with RACK Date: Sat, 29 May 2021 09:52:34 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: chris@cretaforce.gr X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D256217 --- Comment #7 from Christos Chatzaras --- I was able to reproduce the issue with a "test" server && 10 VPS running Li= nux. On each VPS I run wrk (benchmarking tool): wrk -c 1000 -d 3600s http://url This creates 10000 concurrent connections to "test" server. Also in my nginx.conf I replace "keepalive_timeout 60;" with "keepalive_tim= eout 0;" so connections are not reused which helps to show more interrupts faste= r. Then I kill all "wrk" and after 1 minute: sockstat -sSPtcp | grep rack | wc -l 7421 At that moment "top" shows 20% interrupts and "netstat 1" show 1-10 packets= / sec which I believe is my ssh session, so no activity. Also at that moment = tcp "rack" states were FIN_WAIT_1 and CLOSING. After few minutes most "rack" connections close and "top" shows ~ 0.7% interrupts. At that moment I had 4 stuck connections in LAST_ACK state whic= h I drop using "tcpdrop -s LAST_ACK" and finally "top" shows ~ 0.0% interrupts. If it helps I can give root access to the "test" server. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From nobody Sat May 29 10:49:17 2021 X-Original-To: net@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3F7AD7C821 for ; Sat, 29 May 2021 10:49:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FsdbK4Q84z4gKm for ; Sat, 29 May 2021 10:49:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C192C97 for ; Sat, 29 May 2021 10:49:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 14TAnH09068871 for ; Sat, 29 May 2021 10:49:17 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 14TAnHDG068870 for net@FreeBSD.org; Sat, 29 May 2021 10:49:17 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 256217] [tcp] High system load because of interrupts with RACK Date: Sat, 29 May 2021 10:49:17 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: tuexen@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D256217 --- Comment #8 from Michael Tuexen --- (In reply to Christos Chatzaras from comment #7) According to rrs@ (who wrote the HPTS system), the interrupt issue is know. There is code, which reduces the interrupt load, but that code has not yet = been committed to the tree. Regarding stuck connections: Do they clear up after some time or do they ke= ep around? --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From nobody Sat May 29 11:45:15 2021 X-Original-To: net@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39F98D7ED63 for ; Sat, 29 May 2021 11:45:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Fsfqw16yXz4kj4 for ; Sat, 29 May 2021 11:45:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F913163F for ; Sat, 29 May 2021 11:45:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 14TBjG48098708 for ; Sat, 29 May 2021 11:45:16 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 14TBjGMq098707 for net@FreeBSD.org; Sat, 29 May 2021 11:45:16 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 256217] [tcp] High system load because of interrupts with RACK Date: Sat, 29 May 2021 11:45:15 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: chris@cretaforce.gr X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D256217 --- Comment #9 from Christos Chatzaras --- HPTS system is "kern.eventtimer.timer=3DHPET", right? With HPET I see (with "top") ~ 2 times more interrupts in comparison with LAPIC. I tried again to reproduce the issue with a STABLE/13 kernel and it exists = too. Next I will try with a CURRENT kernel as I see some fixes for RACK. Regarding the "stuck" connection in LAST_ACK state someone tries to brute f= orce SSH and "sshguard" blocks the connections (I have 4 "stuck" connection for = SSH at the moment). Also I have 2 "stuck" connections in port 80 from "wrk benchmark". I found this: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D25986 which is old PR b= ut @johalun replied that he can see this issue few months ago. But they are not talking about "rack" so this is not related. The only relation with "rack" = is that these "stuck" connections create interrupts. At the moment these connections "stuck" for more than 35 minutes. Also I see some "stuck" connections in other servers that use "freebsd" stack. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From nobody Sat May 29 12:25:49 2021 X-Original-To: net@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CE57DB84FC for ; Sat, 29 May 2021 12:25:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Fsgkk13f2z4mf1 for ; Sat, 29 May 2021 12:25:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0BBAE1DCD for ; Sat, 29 May 2021 12:25:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 14TCPndK021664 for ; Sat, 29 May 2021 12:25:49 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 14TCPnNM021663 for net@FreeBSD.org; Sat, 29 May 2021 12:25:49 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 256217] [tcp] High system load because of interrupts with RACK Date: Sat, 29 May 2021 12:25:49 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: tuexen@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D256217 --- Comment #10 from Michael Tuexen --- (In reply to Christos Chatzaras from comment #9) > HPTS system is "kern.eventtimer.timer=3DHPET", right? With HPET I see (wi= th "top") ~ 2 > times more interrupts in comparison with LAPIC. No. HPTS is a system for high resolution timing, which can be used by TCP. = The configuration parameters you are referring to are generic time sources. Please note that when using HPTS with RACK, more events are generated and handled compared to the RACK stack. That is what HPTS is for. However, the interrupt load=20 can be reduced by some optimisations. These are the optimisations rrs@ is referring to. > I tried again to reproduce the issue with a STABLE/13 kernel and it exist= s too. Next > I will try with a CURRENT kernel as I see some fixes for RACK. releng/13 and stable/13 should be very similar with respect to RACK. All improvements are only in current right now. > Regarding the "stuck" connection in LAST_ACK state someone tries to brute= force SSH and "sshguard" blocks the connections (I have 4 "stuck" connecti= on for SSH at the moment). Also I have 2 "stuck" connections in port 80 fro= m "wrk benchmark". I found this: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug= .cgi?id=3D25986 which is old PR but @johalun replied that he can see this i= ssue few months ago. But they are not talking about "rack" so this is not r= elated. The only relation with "rack" is that these "stuck" connections cre= ate interrupts. At the moment these connections "stuck" for more than 35 mi= nutes. Also I see some "stuck" connections in other servers that use "freeb= sd" stack. I don't know how sshguard works, but I would be interested in understanding= why that happens... --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From nobody Sat May 29 13:09:37 2021 X-Original-To: net@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 790F1DBC6F1 for ; Sat, 29 May 2021 13:09:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FshjF2lMvz4sc5 for ; Sat, 29 May 2021 13:09:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4415A2857 for ; Sat, 29 May 2021 13:09:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 14TD9bxE041697 for ; Sat, 29 May 2021 13:09:37 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 14TD9bFq041696 for net@FreeBSD.org; Sat, 29 May 2021 13:09:37 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 256217] [tcp] High system load because of interrupts with RACK Date: Sat, 29 May 2021 13:09:37 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: chris@cretaforce.gr X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D256217 --- Comment #11 from Christos Chatzaras --- SSHGuard ( https://www.freshports.org/security/sshguard ) is a tool that ch= ecks /var/log/auth.log , /var/log/maillog, etc and blocks IPs that try to brute force passwords. When someone tries to login for example to SSH multiple ti= mes using wrong password it blocks their IP using IPFW (or PF). As the remote h= ost is not "reachable" any more we can't receive any packets from it which I believe makes the connection to stuck in LAST_ACK state. I tried to use a CURRENT kernel with 13.0 userland, I connect successfully using SSH, but after I run the "wrk benchmark" the server hang. Maybe I hav= e to build a CURRENT userland too. I ask datacenter to connect a KVM to see if monitor shows more information. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From nobody Sat May 29 14:36:55 2021 X-Original-To: net@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8337BF6F80 for ; Sat, 29 May 2021 14:36:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Fskdz5jy0z3NvB for ; Sat, 29 May 2021 14:36:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ACF343D41 for ; Sat, 29 May 2021 14:36:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 14TEatti088618 for ; Sat, 29 May 2021 14:36:55 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 14TEatlf088617 for net@FreeBSD.org; Sat, 29 May 2021 14:36:55 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 256217] [tcp] High system load because of interrupts with RACK Date: Sat, 29 May 2021 14:36:55 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: chris@cretaforce.gr X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: attachments.created Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D256217 --- Comment #12 from Christos Chatzaras --- Created attachment 225360 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D225360&action= =3Dedit tcp_hpts panic The CURRENT kernel (with 13.0 userland) panic because of LRO. I disable LRO= and I successfully boot the server. But during the "wrk benchmark" it panic (tcp_hpts). --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From nobody Sun May 30 02:50:16 2021 X-Original-To: net@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBCDBC7E5FF for ; Sun, 30 May 2021 02:50:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Ft2w84rDZz3Gp3 for ; Sun, 30 May 2021 02:50:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8ED90156F1 for ; Sun, 30 May 2021 02:50:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 14U2oGWq065022 for ; Sun, 30 May 2021 02:50:16 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 14U2oGOo065021 for net@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 30 May 2021 02:50:16 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 230996] em/igb: Intel i210/i350: ifconfig: enabling "vlanhwtag" renders VLAN on i210/i350 NICs unusable Date: Sun, 30 May 2021 02:50:16 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: IntelNetworking, needs-qa, performance, regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: xistence@0x58.com X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? mfc-stable12? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D230996 Bert JW Regeer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |xistence@0x58.com --- Comment #31 from Bert JW Regeer --- Following up with a "me too" on FreeBSD 13.0-RELEASE, with the following configuration: igb0/igb1/igb2/igb3 in a lagg0 on top of which there are multiple vlan interfaces that are created. On FreeBSD 13, even disabling all the hardware assists I was unable to get traffic to flow, on FreeBSD 12.2, no issues at all and everything functions= as designed. Some information: igb0@pci0:1:0:0: class=3D0x020000 card=3D0x00008086 chip=3D0x1539808= 6 rev=3D0x03 hdr=3D0x00 vendor =3D 'Intel Corporation' device =3D 'I211 Gigabit Network Connection' class =3D network subclass =3D ethernet igb0: port 0xe000-0xe01f mem 0xdf500000-0xdf51ffff,0xdf520000-0xdf523fff irq 16 at device 0.0 on pci1 igb0: Using 1024 TX descriptors and 1024 RX descriptors igb0: Using 2 RX queues 2 TX queues igb0: Using MSI-X interrupts with 3 vectors igb0: Ethernet address: 40:62:31:08:92:76 igb0: netmap queues/slots: TX 2/1024, RX 2/1024 root@Breached:/usr/home/xistence # ifconfig igb0 igb0: flags=3D8843 metric 0 mtu 9000 =20=20=20=20=20=20=20 options=3De527bb ether 40:62:31:08:92:76 media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT ) status: active nd6 options=3D29 root@Breached:/usr/home/xistence # ifconfig lagg0 lagg0: flags=3D8843 metric 0 mtu 90= 00 =20=20=20=20=20=20=20 options=3De527bb ether 40:62:31:08:92:76 inet6 fe80::4262:31ff:fe08:9276%lagg0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x8 inet6 2604:5500:c22a:7f00:4262:31ff:fe08:9276 prefixlen 64 inet 172.16.109.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 172.16.109.255 laggproto lacp lagghash l2,l3,l4 laggport: igb0 flags=3D1c laggport: igb1 flags=3D1c laggport: igb2 flags=3D1c laggport: igb3 flags=3D1c groups: lagg media: Ethernet autoselect status: active nd6 options=3D61 root@Breached:/usr/home/xistence # ifconfig vlan10 vlan10: flags=3D8843 metric 0 mtu 9= 000 options=3D600703 ether 40:62:31:08:92:76 inet 192.168.10.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.10.255 inet6 fe80::4262:31ff:fe08:9276%vlan10 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x9 inet6 2604:5500:c22a:7f01:4262:31ff:fe08:9276 prefixlen 64 groups: vlan vlan: 10 vlanpcp: 0 parent interface: lagg0 media: Ethernet autoselect status: active nd6 options=3D61 This is unfortunately my primary router to the internet, so I am unable to experiment with patches. Things I did note: - traffic on lagg0 did function (untagged) - tcpdump on lagg0 did not show any 802.1q frames - tcpdump on igb0 DID show 802.1q frames, but only rx, no tx - rx worked on the vlan interfaces (saw packets coming in) - tx did NOT work, no data was transmitted If this is the wrong bug, please let me know and I can file a new one. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.= From nobody Sun May 30 03:49:18 2021 X-Original-To: net@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AEA4D79FA3 for ; Sun, 30 May 2021 03:49:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Ft4DK0h9nz3MMF for ; Sun, 30 May 2021 03:49:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 007B516549 for ; Sun, 30 May 2021 03:49:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 14U3nKnn096008 for ; Sun, 30 May 2021 03:49:20 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 14U3nKVn096007 for net@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 30 May 2021 03:49:20 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 230996] em/igb: Intel i210/i350: ifconfig: enabling "vlanhwtag" renders VLAN on i210/i350 NICs unusable Date: Sun, 30 May 2021 03:49:18 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: IntelNetworking, needs-qa, performance, regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: jason@tubnor.net X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? mfc-stable12? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D230996 --- Comment #32 from Jason Tubnor --- Bert, Through further investigation on how interfaces behave in a VLAN/non-VLAN s= tage where bridges are concerned, I have found the following interface adjustmen= t in rc.conf remediated the issue (however, the driver should automagically do t= his for the user): ifconfig_igb0=3D"-txcsum -txcsum6 -lro -tso up" Adjust for your specific interface. Can you try that and report back? --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.= From nobody Sun May 30 05:01:17 2021 X-Original-To: net@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FBC2D7CE6C for ; Sun, 30 May 2021 05:01:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Ft5qL6DSnz3R1m for ; Sun, 30 May 2021 05:01:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BEF71175B9 for ; Sun, 30 May 2021 05:01:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 14U51I12035473 for ; Sun, 30 May 2021 05:01:18 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 14U51Ih3035471 for net@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 30 May 2021 05:01:18 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 230996] em/igb: Intel i210/i350: ifconfig: enabling "vlanhwtag" renders VLAN on i210/i350 NICs unusable Date: Sun, 30 May 2021 05:01:17 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: IntelNetworking, needs-qa, performance, regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: jlduran@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? mfc-stable12? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D230996 Jose Luis Duran changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jlduran@gmail.com --- Comment #33 from Jose Luis Duran --- (In reply to Bert JW Regeer from comment #31) You seem to have missed the VLAN Hardware TSO (VLAN_HWTSO) as well. I have not experienced this bug, however my interfaces are configured in a similar way as Jason suggests: ifconfig_igb0=3D"-lro -tso -vlanhwtso up" --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug.= From nobody Sun May 30 09:04:49 2021 X-Original-To: net@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3854FDF7569 for ; Sun, 30 May 2021 09:04:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FtCDL11gqz4QwP for ; Sun, 30 May 2021 09:04:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 086541A794 for ; Sun, 30 May 2021 09:04:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 14U94noU062567 for ; Sun, 30 May 2021 09:04:49 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 14U94n25062566 for net@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 30 May 2021 09:04:49 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 230996] em/igb: Intel i210/i350: ifconfig: enabling "vlanhwtag" renders VLAN on i210/i350 NICs unusable Date: Sun, 30 May 2021 09:04:49 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: IntelNetworking, needs-qa, performance, regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: jason@tubnor.net X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? mfc-stable12? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D230996 --- Comment #34 from Jason Tubnor --- I only needed to apply -vlanhwtso in early versions of 12. We have moved o= ur appliance direct from 11.4 to 13 because of these weird issues in 12 that m= ade it too complex from a configuration point of view and chasing option ghosts. While 13 still has bridged VLAN issues, we have been able to mitigate again= st them without it being too complex (options used are in my previous post). --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.= From nobody Sun May 30 10:15:21 2021 X-Original-To: net@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 298B7BFBF44 for ; Sun, 30 May 2021 10:15:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FtDnj6tYtz4XV1 for ; Sun, 30 May 2021 10:15:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D0E891B65E for ; Sun, 30 May 2021 10:15:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 14UAFLQ3000976 for ; Sun, 30 May 2021 10:15:21 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 14UAFLuT000975 for net@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 30 May 2021 10:15:21 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 255678] security/strongswan cant add routes via RTM_ADD via PF_ROUTE socket Date: Sun, 30 May 2021 10:15:21 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: melifaro@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: melifaro@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: assigned_to cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D255678 Alexander V. Chernikov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|net@FreeBSD.org |melifaro@FreeBSD.org CC| |melifaro@FreeBSD.org --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From nobody Sun May 30 10:31:23 2021 X-Original-To: net@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BCBBBFD807 for ; Sun, 30 May 2021 10:31:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FtF8D0dZVz4ZBq for ; Sun, 30 May 2021 10:31:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F2E711B2DC for ; Sun, 30 May 2021 10:31:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 14UAVNbl007873 for ; Sun, 30 May 2021 10:31:23 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from bugzilla@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 14UAVNZL007872 for net@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 30 May 2021 10:31:23 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: bugzilla set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 255871] [PATCH] net: Fix a use after free in update_rtm_from_rc Date: Sun, 30 May 2021 10:31:23 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: commit-hook@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: melifaro@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam: Yes X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D255871 --- Comment #2 from commit-hook@FreeBSD.org --- A commit in branch stable/13 references this bug: URL: https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/src/commit/?id=3Dd40def01a4f4fed65329f4a74792cad31= 34eeb29 commit d40def01a4f4fed65329f4a74792cad3134eeb29 Author: Alexander V. Chernikov AuthorDate: 2021-05-14 16:03:08 +0000 Commit: Alexander V. Chernikov CommitDate: 2021-05-30 10:30:53 +0000 Fix a use after free in update_rtm_from_rc(). update_rtm_from_rc() calls update_rtm_from_info() internally. The latter one may update provided prtm pointer with a new rtm. Reassign rtm from prtm afeter calling update_rtm_from_info() to avoid touching the freed rtm. PR: 255871 Submitted by: lylgood@foxmail.com sys/net/rtsock.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From nobody Sun May 30 14:24:36 2021 X-Original-To: net@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 892A6C7FA14 for ; Sun, 30 May 2021 14:24:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FtLKJ3PrCz4qXk for ; Sun, 30 May 2021 14:24:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A1CF1E8BD for ; Sun, 30 May 2021 14:24:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 14UEOael034977 for ; Sun, 30 May 2021 14:24:36 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 14UEOajO034976 for net@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 30 May 2021 14:24:36 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 255678] security/strongswan cant add routes via RTM_ADD via PF_ROUTE socket Date: Sun, 30 May 2021 14:24:36 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: rgrimes@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: melifaro@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D255678 Rodney W. Grimes changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |net@FreeBSD.org --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From nobody Sun May 30 19:09:45 2021 X-Original-To: net@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5637DFCE2F for ; Sun, 30 May 2021 19:09:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FtSfL4hKzz3htc for ; Sun, 30 May 2021 19:09:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 861B62250D for ; Sun, 30 May 2021 19:09:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 14UJ9klU077968 for ; Sun, 30 May 2021 19:09:46 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 14UJ9kbQ077967 for net@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 30 May 2021 19:09:46 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 255678] security/strongswan cant add routes via RTM_ADD via PF_ROUTE socket Date: Sun, 30 May 2021 19:09:45 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: martin.larsson2@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: melifaro@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D255678 --- Comment #12 from martin.larsson2@gmail.com --- yes, thanks for looking in to this. here is what you requested I hope. https://dumpinen.com/rbBJLFGuX-n and yes, what I expect is that my two remote networks being 10.11.12.0/24 a= nd 192.168.17.0/24 to be routed via igb0 as it did on earlier versions of free= bsd. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From nobody Sun May 30 21:00:22 2021 X-Original-To: net@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E6DFE5A85D for ; Sun, 30 May 2021 21:00:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FtW5y2h9kz3v0g for ; Sun, 30 May 2021 21:00:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3D97623B3A for ; Sun, 30 May 2021 21:00:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 14UL0MiN040161 for ; Sun, 30 May 2021 21:00:22 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from bugzilla@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 14UL0MQE040160 for net@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 30 May 2021 21:00:22 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <202105302100.14UL0MQE040160@kenobi.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: bugzilla set sender to bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: Problem reports for net@FreeBSD.org that need special attention Date: Sun, 30 May 2021 21:00:22 +0000 List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="16224084222.ebC197fB.39606" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: Y --16224084222.ebC197fB.39606 Date: Sun, 30 May 2021 21:00:22 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" To view an individual PR, use: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=(Bug Id). The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users, which need special attention. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and obsolete releases. Status | Bug Id | Description ------------+-----------+--------------------------------------------------- In Progress | 221146 | [ixgbe] Problem with second laggport New | 204438 | setsockopt() handling of kern.ipc.maxsockbuf limi New | 213410 | [carp] service netif restart causes hang only whe Open | 7556 | ppp: sl_compress_init() will fail if called anyth Open | 166724 | if_re(4): watchdog timeout Open | 193452 | Dell PowerEdge 210 II -- Kernel panic bce (broadc Open | 194453 | dummynet(4): pipe config bw parameter limited to Open | 200319 | Bridge+CARP crashes/freezes Open | 202510 | [CARP] advertisements sourced from CARP IP cause Open | 207261 | netmap: Doesn't do TX sync with kqueue Open | 217978 | dhclient: Support supersede statement for option Open | 222273 | igb(4): Kernel panic (fatal trap 12) due to netwo Open | 225438 | panic in6_unlink_ifa() due to race Open | 227720 | Kernel panic in ppp server Open | 230807 | if_alc(4): Driver not working for Killer Networki Open | 236888 | ppp daemon: Allow MTU to be overridden for PPPoE Open | 236983 | bnxt(4) VLAN not operational unless explicit "ifc Open | 237072 | netgraph(4): performance issue [on HardenedBSD]? Open | 237840 | Removed dummynet dependency on ipfw Open | 238324 | Add XG-C100C/AQtion AQC107 10GbE NIC driver Open | 238707 | Lock order reversal: rtentry vs "nd6 list" Open | 240944 | em(4): Crash with Intel 82571EB NIC with AMD Pile Open | 241106 | tun/ppp: panic: vm_fault: fault on nofault entry Open | 241162 | Panic in closefp() triggered by nginx (uwsgi with Open | 241191 | route flush panic with RADIX_MPATH Open | 243463 | ix0: Watchdog timeout Open | 244066 | divert: Add sysctls for divert socket send and re Open | 118111 | rc: network.subr Add MAC address based interface 28 problems total for which you should take action. --16224084222.ebC197fB.39606-- From nobody Sun May 30 21:18:41 2021 X-Original-To: net@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3022CE5F25A for ; Sun, 30 May 2021 21:18:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FtWW90h2kz4Vvd for ; Sun, 30 May 2021 21:18:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0065E23C4F for ; Sun, 30 May 2021 21:18:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 14ULIiVB050041 for ; Sun, 30 May 2021 21:18:44 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 14ULIi3n050040 for net@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 30 May 2021 21:18:44 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 230996] em/igb: Intel i210/i350: ifconfig: enabling "vlanhwtag" renders VLAN on i210/i350 NICs unusable Date: Sun, 30 May 2021 21:18:41 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: IntelNetworking, needs-qa, performance, regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: xistence@0x58.com X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? mfc-stable12? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D230996 --- Comment #35 from Bert JW Regeer --- I'm sorry for the extra noise all, I made a mistake. On my system FreeBSD 13.0 works perfectly now. What I missed and what Allan Jude mentioned on twitter was that I was using an out of sync kernel <-> us= er land due to rebooting after freebsd-install told me to do so, but without t= hen continuing with the upgrade and rebooting again. root@Breached:/usr/home/xistence # uname -a FreeBSD Breached.home.arpa 13.0-RELEASE-p1 FreeBSD 13.0-RELEASE-p1 #0: Wed = May 26 22:15:09 UTC 2021=20=20=20=20 root@amd64-builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/sys/GENERIC= =20 amd64 root@Breached:/usr/home/xistence # ifconfig igb0 igb0: flags=3D8863 metric 0 mtu 9000 =20=20=20=20=20=20=20 options=3D4e527bb ether 40:62:31:08:92:76 media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT ) status: active nd6 options=3D29 root@Breached:/usr/home/xistence # ifconfig lagg0 lagg0: flags=3D8843 metric 0 mtu 90= 00 =20=20=20=20=20=20=20 options=3D4e527bb ether 40:62:31:08:92:76 inet6 fe80::4262:31ff:fe08:9276%lagg0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x8 inet6 2604:5500:c22a:7f00:4262:31ff:fe08:9276 prefixlen 64 inet 172.16.109.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 172.16.109.255 laggproto lacp lagghash l2,l3,l4 laggport: igb0 flags=3D1c laggport: igb1 flags=3D1c laggport: igb2 flags=3D1c laggport: igb3 flags=3D1c groups: lagg media: Ethernet autoselect status: active nd6 options=3D61 root@Breached:/usr/home/xistence # ifconfig vlan10 vlan10: flags=3D8843 metric 0 mtu 1= 500 =20=20=20=20=20=20=20 options=3D4600703 ether 40:62:31:08:92:76 inet 192.168.10.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.10.255 inet6 fe80::4262:31ff:fe08:9276%vlan10 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x9 inet6 2604:5500:c22a:7f01:4262:31ff:fe08:9276 prefixlen 64 groups: vlan vlan: 10 vlanproto: 802.1q vlanpcp: 0 parent interface: lagg0 media: Ethernet autoselect status: active nd6 options=3D61