From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun May 2 14:20:57 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26123626A6D for ; Sun, 2 May 2021 14:20:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david@catwhisker.org) Received: from mx.catwhisker.org (mx.catwhisker.org [107.204.234.170]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FY7Z015RXz4jvq for ; Sun, 2 May 2021 14:20:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david@catwhisker.org) Received: from albert.catwhisker.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by albert.catwhisker.org (8.16.1/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 142EKsSc011769 for ; Sun, 2 May 2021 14:20:54 GMT (envelope-from david@albert.catwhisker.org) Received: (from david@localhost) by albert.catwhisker.org (8.16.1/8.16.1/Submit) id 142EKsZR011768 for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Sun, 2 May 2021 07:20:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from david) Date: Sun, 2 May 2021 07:20:54 -0700 From: David Wolfskill To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: I thought "pkg updating" would alert me about python...? Message-ID: Reply-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ZsJM87gFBeh4JGiF" Content-Disposition: inline X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FY7Z015RXz4jvq X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of david@catwhisker.org designates 107.204.234.170 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=david@catwhisker.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.60 / 15.00]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:107.204.234.170:c]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; SIGNED_PGP(-2.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[107.204.234.170:from]; REPLYTO_EQ_TO_ADDR(5.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7018, ipnet:107.192.0.0/12, country:US]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; FREEFALL_USER(0.00)[david]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.20)[multipart/signed,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[catwhisker.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[107.204.234.170:from:127.0.2.255]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-ports] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 May 2021 14:20:57 -0000 --ZsJM87gFBeh4JGiF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I just re-verified the behavior, so -- even though I have already started taking evasive action (updating python), I figured it may be of use to show what I'm seeing; maybe I'm confused: Local ports tree is updated; previous ports update was a week ago. I happen to know that there's an UPDATING entry: lgld-dhw(12.2-S)[4] tail +16 /usr/ports/UPDATING | head -5 20210425: AFFECTS: users of python AUTHOR: kai@FreeBSD.org The default version of python3 and python was switched to 3.8. And that this machine should be affected: lgld-dhw(12.2-S)[5] pkg info -o python\* python27-2.7.18_1 lang/python27 python36-3.6.13 lang/python36 python38-3.8.9 lang/python38 [As noted above, I had already started evasive action.] But "pkg updating" is not actually showing the above entry: lgld-dhw(12.2-S)[6] pkg updating -d 20210424 lgld-dhw(12.2-S)[7] echo $? 0 Am I alone in expecting "pkg updating" to have displayed the 20210425 entry? (There was an issue a while back, where "pkg updating" was not showing "glob" entries, but that has since been addressed.) This is on a machine running stable/12: lgld-dhw(12.2-S)[8] uname -a FreeBSD lgld-dhw.corp.example.com 12.2-STABLE FreeBSD 12.2-STABLE #21 stabl= e/12-n233048-23a3c3d97d72: Sun May 2 04:43:57 PDT 2021 root@lgld-dhw.c= orp.example.com:/common/S2/obj/common/S2/src/amd64.amd64/sys/GENERIC amd64 lgld-dhw(12.2-S)[9] pkg -v 1.16.3 Thanks. Peace, david --=20 David H. Wolfskill david@catwhisker.org "some of the terminology that was used, like 'hugs and kisses,' and 'very fine people,' is like very different from what I experienced and what my co-workers experienced on the 6th." - Michael Fanone, DC Metro Police Offic= er See https://www.catwhisker.org/~david/publickey.gpg for my public key. --ZsJM87gFBeh4JGiF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQGTBAEBCgB9FiEE4owz2QxMJyaxAefyQLJg+bY2PckFAmCOtUZfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldEUy OEMzM0Q5MEM0QzI3MjZCMTAxRTdGMjQwQjI2MEY5QjYzNjNEQzkACgkQQLJg+bY2 Pcm2Jgf9Eft/EZ+PueGTxKYJKflysBOU0rvOHtN3K09QNoVM3hIuD7NB1Y/ioh7v KEGmqFeOj2EOey3L5dc6sDuX0hfCZGwbTZBn9BQjWkhnfKLXOwP7D3gFli9eUqO+ FmmovM8C3IZA+B+SNW9R4o0Lmg/RQGqY8wh5zxOG4e1Txdu8K2AzzfHytujRYlx/ seYE9SZcG0lS9FirxQ1Q5nKOfKRTck3x9F0ucMHFgZtu2qnHCEcUDFczLxjXwWZw 1+cCKTQHn8/jLBkcobhNmZstCKmaj2tTeNx7RWasxOg1ef0vBY9XcWyXKFMt2mmh kaI8eIpq42MC89NkQjzBXqpL8srEPg== =QBHy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ZsJM87gFBeh4JGiF-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun May 2 17:55:54 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1E7E62C184 for ; Sun, 2 May 2021 17:55:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lumiwa@dismail.de) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FYDL25YFlz4srL for ; Sun, 2 May 2021 17:55:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lumiwa@dismail.de) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id BC7DC62C183; Sun, 2 May 2021 17:55:54 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC47E62BF9E for ; Sun, 2 May 2021 17:55:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lumiwa@dismail.de) Received: from mx1.dismail.de (mx1.dismail.de [78.46.223.134]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA512 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mx1.dismail.de", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FYDL15Lwhz4t8S for ; Sun, 2 May 2021 17:55:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lumiwa@dismail.de) Received: from mx1.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 10bbee67 for ; Sun, 2 May 2021 19:55:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp1.dismail.de ( [10.240.26.11]) by mx1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 8cc4df7b for ; Sun, 2 May 2021 19:55:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp1.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id f6d67bb1 for ; Sun, 2 May 2021 19:55:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: by dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 012c482d (TLSv1.3:AEAD-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO) for ; Sun, 2 May 2021 19:55:50 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 2 May 2021 13:55:45 -0400 From: LuMiWa To: FreeBSD Ports Subject: gdal Message-ID: <20210502135545.3a487b8b@dismail.de> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.8 (GTK+ 2.24.33; amd64-portbld-freebsd13.0) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FYDL15Lwhz4t8S X-Spamd-Bar: ------ X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-6.70 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[dismail.de:s=20190914]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_MED(-2.00)[dismail.de:dkim]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:78.46.223.134]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[ports@freebsd.org]; RCVD_DKIM_ARC_DNSWL_MED(-0.50)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED(-0.20)[78.46.223.134:from]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[dismail.de:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[dismail.de,reject]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:78.46.0.0/15, country:DE]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[ports] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 May 2021 17:55:55 -0000 Hi! I have a problem to build graphics/gdal on FreeBSD-13.0-RELEASE: m::seekp' declared here: type mismatch at 1st parameter ('uint64_t' (aka 'unsigned long') vs 'GInt64' (aka 'long long')) virtual void seekp (uint64_t pos) =3D 0; ^ exrdataset.cpp:495:1: error: unknown type name 'Int64'; did you mean 'GInt64'? Int64 GDALEXRIOStream::tellg () ^~~~~ GInt64 /usr/ports/graphics/gdal/work/gdal-3.2.2/port/cpl_port.h:267:26: note: 'GInt64' declared here typedef GIntBig GInt64; ^ exrdataset.cpp:497:24: error: unknown type name 'Int64'; did you mean 'GInt64'? return static_cast(VSIFTellL(m_fp)); ^~~~~ GInt64 /usr/ports/graphics/gdal/work/gdal-3.2.2/port/cpl_port.h:267:26: note: 'GInt64' declared here typedef GIntBig GInt64; ^ exrdataset.cpp:500:30: error: unknown type name 'Int64'; did you mean 'GInt64'? void GDALEXRIOStream::seekg (Int64 pos) ^~~~~ GInt64 /usr/ports/graphics/gdal/work/gdal-3.2.2/port/cpl_port.h:267:26: note: 'GInt64' declared here typedef GIntBig GInt64; ^ exrdataset.cpp:566:36: error: allocating an object of abstract class type 'GDALEXRIOStream' poDS->m_pIStream.reset(new GDALEXRIOStream(fp, osFilename)); ^ exrdataset.cpp:992:25: error: variable type 'GDALEXRIOStream' is an abstract class GDALEXRIOStream ostream(fp, pszFilename); ^ exrdataset.cpp:1984:32: error: allocating an object of abstract class type 'GDALEXRIOStream' poDS->m_pOStream.reset(new GDALEXRIOStream(fp, pszFilename)); ^ 3 warnings and 14 errors generated. gmake[4]: *** [../../GDALmake.opt:646: ../o/exrdataset.o] Error 1 gmake[4]: Leaving directory '/usr/ports/graphics/gdal/work/gdal-3.2.2/frmts/exr' gmake[3]: *** [GNUmakefile:15: exr-install-obj] Error 2 gmake[3]: Leaving directory '/usr/ports/graphics/gdal/work/gdal-3.2.2/frmts' gmake[2]: *** [GNUmakefile:114: frmts-target] Error 2 gmake[2]: Leaving directory '/usr/ports/graphics/gdal/work/gdal-3.2.2' *** Error code 1 Stop. make[1]: stopped in /usr/ports/graphics/gdal *** Error code 1 Thank you. --=20 =E2=80=9CTwo things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm= not sure about the universe.=E2=80=9D =E2=80=95 Albert Einstein=20 From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun May 2 18:14:19 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7835F62C6C7 for ; Sun, 2 May 2021 18:14:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lbartoletti@tuxfamily.org) Received: from smtp6-g21.free.fr (smtp6-g21.free.fr [212.27.42.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FYDlF6fBrz4tsw for ; Sun, 2 May 2021 18:14:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lbartoletti@tuxfamily.org) Received: from iMac-de-Loic.local (unknown [IPv6:2a01:e34:ef45:d440:4d16:600:8dea:ce72]) by smtp6-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECF3C780340 for ; Sun, 2 May 2021 20:14:12 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: gdal To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <20210502135545.3a487b8b@dismail.de> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Lo=c3=afc_Bartoletti?= Message-ID: Date: Sun, 2 May 2021 20:14:12 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210502135545.3a487b8b@dismail.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: fr X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FYDlF6fBrz4tsw X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=neutral (mx1.freebsd.org: 212.27.42.6 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of lbartoletti@tuxfamily.org) smtp.mailfrom=lbartoletti@tuxfamily.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.85 / 15.00]; R_SPF_NEUTRAL(0.00)[?all]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_GOOD(0.00)[212.27.42.6:from]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; R_MIXED_CHARSET(1.25)[subject]; ASN(0.00)[asn:12322, ipnet:212.27.32.0/19, country:FR]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FREEFALL_USER(0.00)[lbartoletti]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[212.27.42.6:from]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[tuxfamily.org: no valid DMARC record]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[212.27.42.6:from:127.0.2.255]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[212.27.42.6:from]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-ports] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 May 2021 18:14:19 -0000 Hi, What's your options? How do you build it? Thanks. Loïc Le 02/05/2021 à 19:55, LuMiWa via freebsd-ports a écrit : > Hi! > > I have a problem to build graphics/gdal on FreeBSD-13.0-RELEASE: > m::seekp' declared here: type mismatch at 1st parameter ('uint64_t' > (aka 'unsigned long') vs 'GInt64' (aka 'long long')) virtual void > seekp (uint64_t pos) = 0; ^ > exrdataset.cpp:495:1: error: unknown type name 'Int64'; did you mean > 'GInt64'? Int64 GDALEXRIOStream::tellg () > ^~~~~ > GInt64 > /usr/ports/graphics/gdal/work/gdal-3.2.2/port/cpl_port.h:267:26: note: > 'GInt64' declared here typedef GIntBig GInt64; > ^ > exrdataset.cpp:497:24: error: unknown type name 'Int64'; did you mean > 'GInt64'? return static_cast(VSIFTellL(m_fp)); > ^~~~~ > GInt64 > /usr/ports/graphics/gdal/work/gdal-3.2.2/port/cpl_port.h:267:26: note: > 'GInt64' declared here typedef GIntBig GInt64; > ^ > exrdataset.cpp:500:30: error: unknown type name 'Int64'; did you mean > 'GInt64'? void GDALEXRIOStream::seekg (Int64 pos) > ^~~~~ > GInt64 > /usr/ports/graphics/gdal/work/gdal-3.2.2/port/cpl_port.h:267:26: note: > 'GInt64' declared here typedef GIntBig GInt64; > ^ > exrdataset.cpp:566:36: error: allocating an object of abstract class > type 'GDALEXRIOStream' poDS->m_pIStream.reset(new GDALEXRIOStream(fp, > osFilename)); ^ > exrdataset.cpp:992:25: error: variable type 'GDALEXRIOStream' is an > abstract class GDALEXRIOStream ostream(fp, pszFilename); > ^ > exrdataset.cpp:1984:32: error: allocating an object of abstract class > type 'GDALEXRIOStream' poDS->m_pOStream.reset(new GDALEXRIOStream(fp, > pszFilename)); ^ > 3 warnings and 14 errors generated. > gmake[4]: *** [../../GDALmake.opt:646: ../o/exrdataset.o] Error 1 > gmake[4]: Leaving directory > '/usr/ports/graphics/gdal/work/gdal-3.2.2/frmts/exr' gmake[3]: *** > [GNUmakefile:15: exr-install-obj] Error 2 gmake[3]: Leaving directory > '/usr/ports/graphics/gdal/work/gdal-3.2.2/frmts' gmake[2]: *** > [GNUmakefile:114: frmts-target] Error 2 gmake[2]: Leaving directory > '/usr/ports/graphics/gdal/work/gdal-3.2.2' *** Error code 1 > > Stop. > make[1]: stopped in /usr/ports/graphics/gdal > *** Error code 1 > > Thank you. > > From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun May 2 18:45:44 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CD8462D386 for ; Sun, 2 May 2021 18:45:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lumiwa@dismail.de) Received: from mx1.dismail.de (mx1.dismail.de [78.46.223.134]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA512 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mx1.dismail.de", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FYFRW1JSSz3BsC for ; Sun, 2 May 2021 18:45:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lumiwa@dismail.de) Received: from mx1.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id e65d0788; Sun, 2 May 2021 20:45:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp1.dismail.de ( [10.240.26.11]) by mx1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 3a113085; Sun, 2 May 2021 20:45:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp1.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 257f5fe2; Sun, 2 May 2021 20:45:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: by dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 5f7fbc4f (TLSv1.3:AEAD-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO); Sun, 2 May 2021 20:45:39 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 2 May 2021 14:45:36 -0400 From: LuMiWa To: =?UTF-8?B?TG/Dr2M=?= Bartoletti Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gdal Message-ID: <20210502144536.59e59c99@dismail.de> In-Reply-To: References: <20210502135545.3a487b8b@dismail.de> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.8 (GTK+ 2.24.33; amd64-portbld-freebsd13.0) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FYFRW1JSSz3BsC X-Spamd-Bar: ------ X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-6.70 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[dismail.de:s=20190914]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_MED(-2.00)[dismail.de:dkim]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:78.46.223.134]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCVD_DKIM_ARC_DNSWL_MED(-0.50)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[dismail.de:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[dismail.de,reject]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED(-0.20)[78.46.223.134:from]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:78.46.0.0/15, country:DE]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-ports] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 May 2021 18:45:44 -0000 On Sun, 2 May 2021 20:14:12 +0200 Lo=C3=AFc Bartoletti wrote: > Hi, >=20 > What's your options? How do you build it? >=20 > Thanks. >=20 > Lo=C3=AFc >=20 I built with the default options. I am using portmaster and I try cd /usr/oprts/graphics/gdal and make but the same result --=20 =E2=80=9CTwo things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm= not sure about the universe.=E2=80=9D =E2=80=95 Albert Einstein=20 From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun May 2 18:51:24 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF4B062D419 for ; Sun, 2 May 2021 18:51:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from manojav@manojav.com) Received: from mail-lj1-x236.google.com (mail-lj1-x236.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::236]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FYFZ40yWyz3BrT for ; Sun, 2 May 2021 18:51:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from manojav@manojav.com) Received: by mail-lj1-x236.google.com with SMTP id s25so4323920lji.0 for ; Sun, 02 May 2021 11:51:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=manojav.com; s=google; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=m2XhexltNoiRlBeJYV6LNHiPzJkzvnwZr/rrCUX2NLo=; b=WJ4ufPWo6KrJLQpIcsu54aVf37D1zfgFGvxUO/sfnNwyJIlPq4/QEI3v9EbhbGa8UV ATKx8ICISpvQiDGr1gOj+mtC4wppQME/39Jq5NhemMPTflDKFhu0JgkTu7PD+LL7Wc9W zG5+X46uaZnTi0J9SBiNLjsYdI1xMGBt+RoJs= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=m2XhexltNoiRlBeJYV6LNHiPzJkzvnwZr/rrCUX2NLo=; b=dAeQs0SYsk+PydYOjpYqhBocl9ENZ/y5IPMpMft93eaJXmCpSjXeeESBQIo6SRVxGS dta/3SlgUSY/PNss21DgXPvl76x7V9KMSnvBf2Az2NKnLaIALWOTaiG0DXZAgah5jHIy jXmtLg3JFdUeGseEBD4+cWy9ADOCdVAf/p5Ck39CoDni6rMC4BG23eTfLlCeyRcbpV5H tqCr9HMVuWsFOWNxvcRqSE+aYGkcT3fHeVe9+bdUIiALEKohpNl28jCr8D24XcKgtDgE FFx+QG0KNX/u1kx9PCRLX7QuDaGFHVvFsY0+6qwScanMaDCvU01zXB2bU3uIhiE7YGs3 P63A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532K+zRrVX0qYBXZuey+TJB4ajmHlAo9Jx6eZgBIYyj5XYtVFBMc mOv/D9NSV2eYw5Eo2eRxREDshCzH4KEe7XtX8J7yQJFDJ2DNog== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzLdFB8nbH3H5G3WWtaR7G9u3nTJlnNjszbQIbfbZir/bCc2vr9xMiAVQsCkxs98wz1lb11Ap2EgdzafPaypbo= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:b0e3:: with SMTP id h3mr6863563ljl.459.1619981481074; Sun, 02 May 2021 11:51:21 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Manojav Sridhar Date: Sun, 2 May 2021 14:50:55 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Wireguard - KPs and Silent memory corruption To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FYFZ40yWyz3BrT X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=manojav.com header.s=google header.b=WJ4ufPWo; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of manojav@manojav.com has no SPF policy when checking 2a00:1450:4864:20::236) smtp.mailfrom=manojav@manojav.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.29 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.999]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[manojav.com:s=google]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[2a00:1450:4864:20::236:from:127.0.2.255]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[manojav.com]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[manojav.com:+]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.99)[-0.995]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2a00:1450:4864:20::236:from]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[2a00:1450:4864:20::236:from]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2a00:1450::/32, country:US]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-ports]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.34 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 May 2021 18:51:24 -0000 Hello Jason, Couple of issues to report. I am running the wireguard-kmod-0.0.20210428 snapshot on my pfsense router. I am working with the pfSense-pkg-Wireguard effort in building the WG package. Admittedly I am mostly testing and providing some UI code. However I have come across 2 errors. First one is a KP that happened sometime today. db:0:kdb.enter.default> bt Tracing pid 0 tid 100402 td 0xfffff800c67b6740 kdb_enter() at kdb_enter+0x37/frame 0xfffffe004d02c4b0 vpanic() at vpanic+0x197/frame 0xfffffe004d02c500 panic() at panic+0x43/frame 0xfffffe004d02c560 trap_fatal() at trap_fatal+0x391/frame 0xfffffe004d02c5c0 trap() at trap+0x67/frame 0xfffffe004d02c6d0 calltrap() at calltrap+0x8/frame 0xfffffe004d02c6d0 --- trap 0x9, rip = 0xffffffff840fd580, rsp = 0xfffffe004d02c7a0, rbp = 0xfffffe004d02c7e0 --- noise_remote_index_insert() at noise_remote_index_insert+0xb0/frame 0xfffffe004d02c7e0 noise_consume_initiation() at noise_consume_initiation+0x6bb/frame 0xfffffe004d02ca10 wg_softc_handshake_receive() at wg_softc_handshake_receive+0x27a/frame 0xfffffe004d02cb20 gtaskqueue_run_locked() at gtaskqueue_run_locked+0x121/frame 0xfffffe004d02cb80 gtaskqueue_thread_loop() at gtaskqueue_thread_loop+0xb6/frame 0xfffffe004d02cbb0 fork_exit() at fork_exit+0x7e/frame 0xfffffe004d02cbf0 fork_trampoline() at fork_trampoline+0xe/frame 0xfffffe004d02cbf0 Second issue is that I am seeing memory silent corruption where the pfSense UI stops responding and serves up invalid files. Reboot fixes it. I have NOT noticed this issue with the 0415 snapshot; this happened both in the 0424 and 0428 snapshots. While I cannot definitively say its wg related, that is the only bit changing on the boxes. Thanks From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun May 2 20:14:14 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9297D5F847E for ; Sun, 2 May 2021 20:14:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ronald-lists@klop.ws) Received: from smarthost1.greenhost.nl (smarthost1.greenhost.nl [195.190.28.88]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FYHPd4T3Zz3HK6 for ; Sun, 2 May 2021 20:14:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ronald-lists@klop.ws) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=klop.ws; s=mail; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version: Date:Message-ID:From:References:To:Subject:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=lXu6Mv190bptaxoX0Jtrcyj+ysz6j5SlANrQJ2aOV+Q=; b=kPvvIqAEGX8MK3YdYBqyMpNKIM wmqRLOWt9pgb+C3vrKIwNHfZfn6JKR51DIE2l8rjgWTYM8wsIp67ZKBOWi5BNDJ2uJumv4LeF3lHE uZIoebXwY3T6gDHP0lwNHNTaVeS6e3bHA1NSqv+RQ1MW3FmUgSgcWjRcqv6bF0BfaHpU=; Subject: Re: I thought "pkg updating" would alert me about python...? To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: From: Ronald Klop Message-ID: <02c13b1f-198f-3163-8688-7d01f60baee5@klop.ws> Date: Sun, 2 May 2021 22:14:05 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authenticated-As-Hash: 398f5522cb258ce43cb679602f8cfe8b62a256d1 X-Virus-Scanned: by clamav at smarthost1.greenhost.nl X-Spam-Level: / X-Spam-Score: -0.4 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED, BAYES_50, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, NICE_REPLY_A autolearn=disabled version=3.4.2 X-Scan-Signature: 488b5a33f748713be529de57fa847022 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FYHPd4T3Zz3HK6 X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=klop.ws header.s=mail header.b=kPvvIqAE; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=klop.ws; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of ronald-lists@klop.ws designates 195.190.28.88 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=ronald-lists@klop.ws X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.98 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_VERYGOOD(0.00)[195.190.28.88:from]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[klop.ws:s=mail]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:195.190.28.64/27]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[klop.ws:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[klop.ws,none]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[195.190.28.88:from]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.98)[-0.975]; RCVD_COUNT_ZERO(0.00)[0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:47172, ipnet:195.190.28.0/24, country:NL]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-ports] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 May 2021 20:14:14 -0000 On 5/2/21 4:20 PM, David Wolfskill wrote: > I just re-verified the behavior, so -- even though I have already > started taking evasive action (updating python), I figured it may be of > use to show what I'm seeing; maybe I'm confused: > > Local ports tree is updated; previous ports update was a week ago. I > happen to know that there's an UPDATING entry: > > lgld-dhw(12.2-S)[4] tail +16 /usr/ports/UPDATING | head -5 > 20210425: > AFFECTS: users of python > AUTHOR: kai@FreeBSD.org > > The default version of python3 and python was switched to 3.8. > > > And that this machine should be affected: > > lgld-dhw(12.2-S)[5] pkg info -o python\* > python27-2.7.18_1 lang/python27 > python36-3.6.13 lang/python36 > python38-3.8.9 lang/python38 > > > [As noted above, I had already started evasive action.] > > But "pkg updating" is not actually showing the above entry: > > lgld-dhw(12.2-S)[6] pkg updating -d 20210424 > lgld-dhw(12.2-S)[7] echo $? > 0 > > > Am I alone in expecting "pkg updating" to have displayed the 20210425 > entry? > > (There was an issue a while back, where "pkg updating" was not showing > "glob" entries, but that has since been addressed.) > > This is on a machine running stable/12: > > lgld-dhw(12.2-S)[8] uname -a > FreeBSD lgld-dhw.corp.example.com 12.2-STABLE FreeBSD 12.2-STABLE #21 stable/12-n233048-23a3c3d97d72: Sun May 2 04:43:57 PDT 2021 root@lgld-dhw.corp.example.com:/common/S2/obj/common/S2/src/amd64.amd64/sys/GENERIC amd64 > lgld-dhw(12.2-S)[9] pkg -v > 1.16.3 > > Thanks. > > Peace, > david > The UPDATING file says "users of python" while the pkg/port name is python37. So that does not match. It does match for humans but not for computers. :-) The UPDATING entry should have said something like "users of lang/python*" to work. Regards, Ronald. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun May 2 20:31:55 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E6B85F8ECD for ; Sun, 2 May 2021 20:31:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tatsuki_makino@hotmail.com) Received: from APC01-PU1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-oln040092254062.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.92.254.62]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.protection.outlook.com", Issuer "DigiCert Cloud Services CA-1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FYHp14vcLz3JFb for ; Sun, 2 May 2021 20:31:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tatsuki_makino@hotmail.com) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=eFE8JcpH+t69xhxbEo63kMzOClCzPlwSP90lhuYu4zb3FFSUhJBNYRbBvJvTKW7qwUNTLDhT6JnN1hiRB8scmBF/ZajbrUmOJL/JLUK3nAm3aGtsP3N9sH/NXxN3PQXuzaeTSGyihVdp15+DZ17vj+VJdrXexnwtSqNGroJh7MHJ41xMX0DYgUFaZtOX7g9BRxnvH3d1k7E36+X+YZBgqoRygggCCzYjz34OfLR1WBZm44p3tvsyBcZYYRneSSNrKAL+RwideYTi1zGtMVbDiDp1h00SZUtcN06o2K3eaDZaHE+wKsWbcB2TdrEi0ifyRq4itEoaqT1V0lNSvNmpwg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=bPutL0CRBjjU3wy15s+WHEY71ZEfTJqIWgdXcdYjA3I=; b=CeWpaHNmLndsTEm/ifwzCpdNp2fUwlSkNRy3GSlR1IVxm5h+CXha94D1RVUlYvOXZQBPFiOZ/DqsOhumnJ6yVlu3WNmEuXtFStvALNHlqFA/dqcyyEXGshnlFVOX2WmhGI1KjvdHxj2iHFtDWRwG1BlkiKOzMI/QSYZ/gQCS4YUIFtlCzIz62Ytq9XeZwEQlZjncfYufcwQCCmJbpQoU522IJHF1myGSt5S4YFt8sKb8+w1iMXz739qVeJaE75j/NaSKg6K8pG9A6M5b6dxYA/zGcALSG3EjfhOdoHu67Ot4+Pnt20oDGmSbNhVr445oHlPZmkbreVOWjA4XNdgZQQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=none; dmarc=none; dkim=none; arc=none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hotmail.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=bPutL0CRBjjU3wy15s+WHEY71ZEfTJqIWgdXcdYjA3I=; b=Z3MGWaO2JKemZEDo90WVTlPIyIRQOcgQJFl49p5LMaMzslgZamAm8Q19XidL4Jv50GxPqlfyZdsYtJBKbHy/meMPWSpFE9pgqIuaY402QCD4JGARJ1O1zbTvQuP4z0eKOfAowjkozxUHcp1K0nKOru7S3ZLtYivt/vgnJyX0rKyjS7JbNpQR0zictpWm39RA6LU2tgdIJdlTxL6xpUz9h78gaa/0EM+56H/3jxGcIcBipvIjQYBPFPGIPqHAlbAzVGc75L8QOaZOiyl40bIo6CtZvVvy9d9+gCPi1xFcZMNoaELs75WD5ikVby26XEm6yNB1MqNn5xwg0y79U4kbzg== Received: from PSAPR03MB5639.apcprd03.prod.outlook.com (2603:1096:301:66::13) by PS1PR0302MB2618.apcprd03.prod.outlook.com (2603:1096:803:5::21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.4108.16; Sun, 2 May 2021 20:31:48 +0000 Received: from PSAPR03MB5639.apcprd03.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::c4ad:238c:5d96:7290]) by PSAPR03MB5639.apcprd03.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::c4ad:238c:5d96:7290%7]) with mapi id 15.20.4108.023; Sun, 2 May 2021 20:31:48 +0000 Subject: Re: I thought "pkg updating" would alert me about python...? To: Ronald Klop , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <02c13b1f-198f-3163-8688-7d01f60baee5@klop.ws> From: Tatsuki Makino Message-ID: Date: Mon, 3 May 2021 05:31:45 +0900 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/52.0 SeaMonkey/2.49.4 In-Reply-To: <02c13b1f-198f-3163-8688-7d01f60baee5@klop.ws> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TMN: [lhvvbbYcBq1qrzQRdgSuaioQAnV0weYA] X-ClientProxiedBy: TYXPR01CA0058.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com (2603:1096:403:a::28) To PSAPR03MB5639.apcprd03.prod.outlook.com (2603:1096:301:66::13) X-Microsoft-Original-Message-ID: <20c427e4-cc5f-6821-ef6a-a017d1e0a139@hotmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MS-Exchange-MessageSentRepresentingType: 1 Received: from T4.test (121.95.66.131) by TYXPR01CA0058.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com (2603:1096:403:a::28) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.4087.43 via Frontend Transport; Sun, 2 May 2021 20:31:47 +0000 X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: b1167fe4-376a-48ba-fd84-08d90da94f1e X-MS-Exchange-SLBlob-MailProps: 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 X-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: PS1PR0302MB2618: X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0; X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info: REnsa4Q8UQMxSEDWnxCzZtuCdtZQ3pNdN6ymw4dmSS8Ogg/hHZfCsis/9rXJGJBif7tyfdQpxglpywkD/J2DDXNRZKmAAlmEL9724FcDMrBHULs771wUoykSJrvViqyvKB/Mn70iQ7+hxHkiR5NYNRnGhZcceISjXNlYQ2bQMJPyiL5qkuLbg2ltA4Fiu/c74eRbGVEuBmA7zN56xvcc44KKfFXOoocSVkS2gLNZUA0AjmpJdeiv7zBtG0sJBBxzOMQ9EkjQeRmP2aXRRd3YB0PbgPCvGtF7qmq0jmaC9BmyQgLaROZ/8SW+4dKX5XYpwTC0iTXwv3oZ0scuTH/3u4VNLKSa6F5Ss1jbd3+W4juFqwAeJ8oBpbKN2OmAnfQ1/qTDY+3U3hH6egwNVC/3ug== X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData: tG+NJwXkrSD1HJyzBMU56Qf2PFl1jibwpsADGUxla2g1JzqZRA4dzcxtFnElB4Pa3o4sObUkNeIWda7eOVeQYUJc5RAnXyKDT7wdDP1Fe16cbg72+tQuwBggOY0gdQxg8V8qZTjGufVrz097Dyv5bg== X-OriginatorOrg: sct-15-20-3174-8-msonline-outlook-792b7.templateTenant X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: b1167fe4-376a-48ba-fd84-08d90da94f1e X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: PSAPR03MB5639.apcprd03.prod.outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 May 2021 20:31:48.0886 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-RMS-PersistedConsumerOrg: 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000 X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: PS1PR0302MB2618 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FYHp14vcLz3JFb X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=hotmail.com header.s=selector1 header.b=Z3MGWaO2; arc=pass (microsoft.com:s=arcselector9901:i=1); dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=hotmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of tatsuki_makino@hotmail.com designates 40.92.254.62 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=tatsuki_makino@hotmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.49 / 15.00]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[hotmail.com]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:40.92.0.0/15]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[hotmail.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[hotmail.com,none]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[hotmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:8075, ipnet:40.80.0.0/12, country:US]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[40.92.254.62:from]; ARC_ALLOW(-1.00)[microsoft.com:s=arcselector9901:i=1]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.997]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[hotmail.com:s=selector1]; FORGED_MUA_SEAMONKEY_MSGID_UNKNOWN(2.50)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[hotmail.com:dkim]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.01)[0.006]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[40.92.254.62:from:127.0.2.255]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[40.92.254.62:from]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[40.92.254.62:from]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-ports] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 May 2021 20:31:55 -0000 Ronald Klop wrote on 2021/05/03 05:14: > The UPDATING entry should have said something like "users of lang/python*" to work. The behavior of this is strange. I have the following python* in my environment. python, python27, python3, python37 and python38 AFFECTS: users of python : not match AFFECTS: users of pytho? : match AFFECTS: users of python3 : not match AFFECTS: users of python* : match AFFECTS: users of python3[7] : match package names are also comparable. Does it not pattern match if the pattern match symbol ?, [] or * is not included? Regards. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun May 2 02:03:43 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F9B55E0AE8; Sun, 2 May 2021 02:03:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from curtis@orleans.occnc.com) Received: from mta5-tap0.andover.occnc.com (mta5-tap0.andover.occnc.com [IPv6:2600:2c00:b000:2500::151]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature ECDSA (P-384) client-digest SHA384) (Client CN "mta5.andover.occnc.com", Issuer "OCCNC secondary CA (ca1a2a)" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FXqCK5Xltz3QJw; Sun, 2 May 2021 02:03:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from curtis@orleans.occnc.com) Received: from harbor2.v6cc2.occnc.com (harbor2-cc2.v6cc2.occnc.com [IPv6:2603:3005:5602:8af2::231]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-384) server-digest SHA384) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: curtis@occnc.com) by mta5-tap0.andover.occnc.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C2A7E270F3; Sat, 1 May 2021 22:03:33 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=orleans.occnc.com; s=curtis-orleans-20210422-132019; t=1619921013; bh=W5Zy486dAeG15ntgD3/mwPUYHbopSPsFTwqP55pQBT8=; h=To:cc:Reply-To:Subject:From:Date; b=NzFLaJNGtE9e3nwsF/XjXNvcvV8NzWGLHoz+oVO6gOwL87mn/KRam4bzpr4uDrtqg 67XGq0J3omaOMl9gUGt7Qk4f+JudCx3nTPBdMWRVmJxskTeUd2CibZAsiE+9wNhVgy 0SzJxfN9cU+b9CYKDpZM3gkhRuMP3eyKAi99f8+C2E2w6/pSCbHywUuGhtBbTSb3ml w2K6hY0ukMt711pFheTFAcBTAWqU6Wz+ZJTu8dPNHMeI2cnGbZjotAIgKayUEKKTnp f53Q8fIANRq5RCSHKXVWByOlnU/O/dmf/odhff+aAHea+FDu/TmINaHH97JTQ/Jl3X JBVKOJ2rSRVHA== To: joneum@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-database@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org cc: Curtis Villamizar Reply-To: Curtis Villamizar Subject: From: Curtis Villamizar MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <53354.1619920975.1@harbor2-cc2.v6cc2.occnc.com> Date: Sat, 01 May 2021 22:02:55 -0400 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FXqCK5Xltz3QJw X-Spamd-Bar: + Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=orleans.occnc.com header.s=curtis-orleans-20210422-132019 header.b=NzFLaJNG; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of curtis@orleans.occnc.com designates 2600:2c00:b000:2500::151 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=curtis@orleans.occnc.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [2.00 / 15.00]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[curtis@orleans.occnc.com]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2600:2c00:b000:2500::/64]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[orleans.occnc.com:+]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[2600:2c00:b000:2500::151:from]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7349, ipnet:2600:2c00:b000::/36, country:US]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[orleans.occnc.com:s=curtis-orleans-20210422-132019]; REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(1.00)[0.999]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[occnc.com]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[2600:2c00:b000:2500::151:from:127.0.2.255]; MISSING_MID(2.50)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; EMPTY_SUBJECT(1.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-database,freebsd-ports] X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 03 May 2021 05:23:34 +0000 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 May 2021 02:03:43 -0000 The ports collection still has MySQL server versions 5.7.33 and 8.0.23. The VuXML database has had an entry for mysql since April 20 that affects mysql57-server < 5.7.34 and mysql80-server < 8.0.24. It sounds rather severe: This Critical Patch Update contains 49 new security patches for Oracle MySQL. 10 of these vulnerabilities may be remotely exploitable without authentication, i.e., may be exploited over a network without requiring user credentials. The highest CVSS v3.1 Base Score of vulnerabilities affecting Oracle MySQL is 9.8. See http://vuxml.freebsd.org/freebsd/56ba4513-a1be-11eb-9072-d4c9ef517024.html Any idea when the port will be updated? It might be good to update this promptly just in case someone wants to run some sort of serious mysql application in production. Curtis ps - I copied freebsd-ports since there is no recent activity on freebsd-database other than some spam in January and the mailing list appears to be unused. And btw - yes I know to update using git. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon May 3 06:37:56 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 933A9628BAF; Mon, 3 May 2021 06:37:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd@www.zefox.net) Received: from www.zefox.net (www.zefox.net [50.1.20.27]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "www.zefox.com", Issuer "www.zefox.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FYYFB0PBzz4VL3; Mon, 3 May 2021 06:37:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd@www.zefox.net) Received: from www.zefox.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by www.zefox.net (8.16.1/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 1436bN7m034716 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 2 May 2021 23:37:27 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fbsd@www.zefox.net) Received: (from fbsd@localhost) by www.zefox.net (8.16.1/8.15.2/Submit) id 1436bNv8034715; Sun, 2 May 2021 23:37:23 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fbsd) Date: Sun, 2 May 2021 23:37:01 -0700 From: bob prohaska To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Xoscope nuisance console messages on Pi4 running -current Message-ID: <20210503063701.GA34665@www.zefox.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FYYFB0PBzz4VL3 X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of fbsd@www.zefox.net has no SPF policy when checking 50.1.20.27) smtp.mailfrom=fbsd@www.zefox.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.90 / 15.00]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[50.1.20.27:from]; WWW_DOT_DOMAIN(0.50)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[zefox.net]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[50.1.20.27:from:127.0.2.255]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(1.00)[0.999]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7065, ipnet:50.1.16.0/20, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-arm,freebsd-ports]; MID_RHS_WWW(0.50)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 May 2021 06:37:56 -0000 After a successful compile of audio/xoscope on a Pi4 running current a stream of messages appeared on the console and in the security log while xoscope was running: +WARNING pid 26370 (xoscope): ioctl sign-extension ioctl ffffffffc0045006 +WARNING pid 26370 (xoscope): ioctl sign-extension ioctl ffffffffc0045005 +WARNING pid 26370 (xoscope): ioctl sign-extension ioctl ffffffffc0045002 +WARNING pid 26370 (xoscope): ioctl sign-extension ioctl ffffffffc0045006 +WARNING pid 26370 (xoscope): ioctl sign-extension ioctl ffffffffc0045005 +WARNING pid 26370 (xoscope): ioctl sign-extension ioctl ffffffffc0045002 They seem to come at a fairly high rate and clutter the logfiles, but apart from that nuisance nothing else seemed visibly amiss. Are they of any significance? Thanks for reading, bob prohaska From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon May 3 07:01:37 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E551D6292D0 for ; Mon, 3 May 2021 07:01:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mat@freebsd.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [96.47.72.83]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FYYmd602Sz4WsQ; Mon, 3 May 2021 07:01:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mat@freebsd.org) Received: from mail.j.mat.cc (owncloud.cube.mat.cc [IPv6:2a01:678:4:1::228]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.mat.cc", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) (Authenticated sender: mat/mail) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AB49925004; Mon, 3 May 2021 07:01:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mat@freebsd.org) Received: from aching.in.mat.cc (unknown [IPv6:2a01:678:ab:50:2d91:83ac:13c:768c]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mat@mat.cc) by mail.j.mat.cc (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3EB42942D80; Mon, 3 May 2021 07:01:35 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 3 May 2021 09:01:34 +0200 From: Mathieu Arnold To: Stefan Esser Cc: FreeBSD ports Subject: Re: [SOLVED?] Recovery of deleted ports fails due to pre-commit checks Message-ID: <20210503070134.bydnbc2eah7st2on@aching.in.mat.cc> References: <2c1ab5d2-d885-8f8d-94dd-99d0a5559a88@freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="hnsifsslb7u3wj7q" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2c1ab5d2-d885-8f8d-94dd-99d0a5559a88@freebsd.org> X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 May 2021 07:01:38 -0000 --hnsifsslb7u3wj7q Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, May 01, 2021 at 09:01:02PM +0200, Stefan Esser wrote: > The recovery of deleted ports in their previous form is rejected > by the pre-commit checks on the repository server: >=20 > remote: > remote: =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > remote: Do not commit ports without TIMESTAMP in their distinfo files. > remote: Rerun make makesum to add it. > remote: =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > remote: >=20 > I have tried to revert the deletion with unchanged files and then > updated the ports' Makefiles and distinfo files in a later commit. >=20 > Pushing those commits all together fails with the message above, > and in order to not confuse GIT, deleted files should be committed > first, before applying any changes. This is not needed at all, Git cannot get confused by something it has no knowledge of. Once a file is deleted, or moved, the history tracking stops. --=20 Mathieu Arnold --hnsifsslb7u3wj7q Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQKTBAABCgB9FiEEVhwchfRfuV0unqO5KesJApEdfgIFAmCPn8lfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDU2 MUMxQzg1RjQ1RkI5NUQyRTlFQTNCOTI5RUIwOTAyOTExRDdFMDIACgkQKesJApEd fgJeAA//Qd3yeNY3XxCFxHvi5Lcbtd9EsUPpS5zViULdcsViz/IHtpG8vvYV0Wn0 aw5rg8cDld6WOD+PXqvqnQv5lR/ZacMMlae074yyEqUHSokmQelY3cpfbjnLJy/u 1RGrjCKUnym7b9mbUqDF6Dv/tmXtSQ8qprLlaGIv3g3PmHm5c60ccGjE9X806ans kx/Ac+A0a/uepCZDI7BeFTu/M0BkPHK2+LSty2z6pfaeOKwfWutUTPZX9LkKFx2O /H/6LW6/si15GSbbq08KAp0caoOwWoBUH6bWHIt8WVyUay9zLo4Jnb/r12zAMPCJ kf1la9kCqZPNQAkvUtIrpBvvy4LS3kZIoaBP72Y6KJCM0jAW+TUFvqTiL4fPkHVc qhVDcHiZndT54Nnu/UAQeZTGdxg2A7TuDC+HJ1CEkwOgMPw4zy/ZU2UpxDRTMdaR 2EKlGj+50s0spI7CLsb+OZd5RrSWerkKN7vXUMNPDltNVOp6fiuSgxURC3rxcLUO vVzPo5ML2QQWKvYOd826NjxM9IwK4Wt/ZiajOnTGPlMPO9E0jF2JKSrssQUGEmDn wvw5Fj91RKCcYhs6i65KJgfg/RWoRLfY2gwmVzhGKzPUeUyr9XPsqU5EX7Uiyd0m ubdJXO7rmjsu6pbBJ3D9lvn7cXUoGN8ZXE3qOpZJyhf6S0QNsbM= =iiQu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --hnsifsslb7u3wj7q-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon May 3 08:00:15 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6079F62ABA1 for ; Mon, 3 May 2021 08:00:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marklmi@yahoo.com) Received: from sonic313-21.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (sonic313-21.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com [98.137.65.84]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FYb4G0ZJhz4Ym8 for ; Mon, 3 May 2021 08:00:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marklmi@yahoo.com) X-SONIC-DKIM-SIGN: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1620028812; bh=6ErL3r5DtsNgiTDkMVJxXp/EgkaB54WZx4yttrXKbFG=; h=X-Sonic-MF:Subject:From:Date:To:From:Subject; b=taIbe/47xXRwISxZCnRDdxFZuo5Wn2yfNRkWWavGhW7vnep18Vv7mN0WapVQ6iZNHSFhKpYr4moII3jb8jP+TGsZ7X4UCOgHqteVuAgQkZu/502cP2QZr7VuYy26pSZw0i70snHwd4+MiMXlWk8f4mYDRSv9BCXFSJRC7hcMG3lpfL+FR5YANWgJTWUUhJZRdTa7xJdFW8J50rPyT6sBQgkIAcbPbBa+CxgYfY3S9VUqXHDguSYGWKfiN5q/rkjqm7Byz8lIq1bmhMfmGDIosME9GPKcB1zfPB2S2ZMmKrUgdU9JJEqP0Yh/FydGJgLPIJAenrA33srW7EDpdqXM1Q== X-YMail-OSG: KZ6S3YEVM1nt6t2_KRCXaC2AfP0DE16c2Rg8.y1KirN7TV.jcxCyV4Ixki3sCVd bKjeza0Kqq8n7oS8RDKKFVh9b0LxOfg1iz3uwqTPuA6QcAvejqi98MvhP6pmRQlb0OqKAJA_Ns5F iZ_LhEGYvalsea8zjLDXqQIGGBAJngywkGcttTVj0bBcXvMnSU6sR7WBzBCQtyKDjeRt6HDdd3Yq KtOk.4rxlG9.mNpcgxw.dUmuy_FfJGfjiO3t9PgnHySPZYTQ75P0wnt7Ral9Jt_3qO78NUBaXg74 WcXsQspAND8MKEpE_EMPkjxuC3aLQy_j3UHXjolnBV1UcHNAcIMBLpy_w.L1fv5NhPMkDZ33KfaY i6AEYH_uO___uUEcWlT_WvZVJTICQA87Ufq4VCc296Ml0UyQFOQs.jKsm5B_eey1x5T3IHZZ9CyI WZeuBLxAe31R1EE4Y.WJD3ng6hqCxOmKKgCayJAUyG8c8wnxa_GYTU8O2tki2CXEU7h8aytk_073 tDSYxGeyWfyAOXaxSnug.Pkp9ZKVTMZQHA45VwnBMNBps93f7lvCBpuEUToGPU2u.MUfMgt8VPIJ M1KVYzpAyiyWuKc7dtW6OxAByWicKURT5nAfWbv1m_G1jO5a0JKP3LMOgH2NywIxDP101pqICS0g WnSMMJs5V1O.meMdGv7TpAbyZlGbtZwvZV8Wv3adLzK4tNfwwyoEy6RbR4noZK7xQRvYwauTyjLh qEAmMRtyNzpiI97XS5jIPacymv5BT1lpJodX32cxUG1EoNhNAUk0cUt.B_VXRl6_M15GXCQ1FGa7 jUlIeb32s5RJT.AkzVuMAnkTptJv5JPfFHEw_f1Ada.VcNxCvTHueMpHCpRG6aeD4O8nYMctfEu7 yGQ8VF1FmLwtR0BHeCRRy.Rr6DFqVzD4TsPizHZhKt6Y9NAayUCuI3dv18dPfs7Y8FRmxEnTrY7w 9Jv0X_.nCgim.Av2V4DmEsh_3SVL2cWHPOD62luN3zmPPZtamAPqDxnQklFf.vuDAJfuw2XN7K4w S8tdHDvTuKf5fYYyWrX35TvZs02Q7XqlS578nfEwp2.ET.0YAFlIXjGFtO6qoFH9iYh5FcCIGSHw I7dMEiGZrkj7HgyqcxITDXHZLsizY07uCHCwrEaGqUGupaSdnwKxUFiFXgVQUS1IPOCYeTYpTawk HPVkyK7t6DvCnukACKyZfIZ.auKISFy8j8673gNC379G98ipK40TyMKo_rI5.Qfu1Kb_d.obkE4E xW_gZOAQJUMngQ06JRb5FOuRxwgYI.IBbcSmBBVgGVTxI1kh6UFrWbi1k_g8u.XriPHPK.AB7l._ 7C8kwMHGtLUa8C7_Nsv3wX0VMAeIIEH0ICNtfogmNz769PZ8L.OaQB_z8NSBvGIA5n4iahGZZGOc Py25Mm9BLFUJGUzwRCv8X6YSg_dhQkRp6K0j5AE3MJp6k8WRQRaBpY_kyEoDgUAtt41hlQEreH5j f_RAK2LOi6XB6uEUfrR6K4q_b5T4tYjvRYDxUuMvRmF3gK4Y_dkdUrZr7W9C6WvKcNXr0B5quuCP 2Ko1mQohmqgsVoSyLS9ieG9GyjFurmGooX.NIwj_TQXpY6oWUg9VXpRTfcaHovoxX.JBCXxxDH_z I._rR1nMGYpZjV04TmSa5PTseZOZETLNZCJ4B3LZ4aRpYiEKTw6EOvRgmkwVMiW2k_WtKB.TCJ7K O6p_kUYtATTAwsN.lIOVpaKJW6qeP0xRI6yvyML5n21nwXAiD4KWHUlKw2dP08pL0gWR2IHsCf8p j3tk61DISAgO_3NAR.v0IuirrHg5AIsIoGM3vQffb.fpLfdJ3l_B3JdRPlnI_KqjlvbB_rq8R2i2 ozIHf_d_Tw.f1kUCKz1gfP1vHZ_APkVt9CWS7naixjBH1XRhpWDxEbNaBgm5wEVPfsrWMCXuIBBL btzci7rOZnxRHgYr1PZ6Bu9r2iRy1uJogpsBwRfd3sKMAhcq_6jLCDPbUvxzRR3swuc0InRyNDrv 1qbI9moMpxr5AUJwwzSJlJQ69U0od.SCQ8yDiUd9BL30ubqgH_xC1o.UAlqHyIszn1_doKm91b47 8HfoJEOax8jVJUEoIwkI2gfoIBGJ309lLCPKjrUA8BUJMLrwCL6jcjUQqi4ntyxie8urj5c5v0F8 wVExtGimUhkDIXJ3H8z7BruoxHMY4w.GWC2pPwyuK7lAgn6GUaho6bFGjlykZfQRNNa8EglmdL13 KJSRzJUitmaM9GC0oPzyfGllC3ld54T4DaXlkVdZINpq3B_NpqQAOilLpg4qkqGzgEca4gnteQvZ FF_wGeCSMQkW8DTblYhfzXex_b_9ddEOAXwOy.mzJff68CT9EE7z8E2xP9zBxaD_qcagtMTdGGko c7Aif2aACD4.xDXXJP1fcA3T9pBa5OZ9OJTviFP5OEuKQCitSqZTX1SLmsLXl5ROs_vxs2FseGyq HPy8P.L6LwfbQ8_UnApBUeOBgh1fYV0JXau2gg2Cm.bQlcdUiDmYLrSg8CjSpex9WBV6I2LA6Rp_ owAS6O_g2G1wqlT4d6ViIB4Wjh6CeN3CdcipV56pjxEP4YKksm47xDjPdMW.o8cKD X-Sonic-MF: Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic313.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with HTTP; Mon, 3 May 2021 08:00:12 +0000 Received: by kubenode544.mail-prod1.omega.bf1.yahoo.com (VZM Hermes SMTP Server) with ESMTPA ID 713617f43e67148f4c1c8b25a07426a5; Mon, 03 May 2021 08:00:06 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.60.0.2.21\)) Subject: Re: Xoscope nuisance console messages on Pi4 running -current From: Mark Millard In-Reply-To: <20210503063701.GA34665@www.zefox.net> Date: Mon, 3 May 2021 01:00:03 -0700 Cc: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <263BF9DF-B22B-4579-9667-AFCB7D2D667C@yahoo.com> References: <20210503063701.GA34665@www.zefox.net> To: bob prohaska X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.60.0.2.21) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FYb4G0ZJhz4Ym8 X-Spamd-Bar: - X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.94 / 15.00]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[yahoo.com]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ptr:yahoo.com]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[yahoo.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[yahoo.com,reject]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[yahoo.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:36647, ipnet:98.137.64.0/20, country:US]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[98.137.65.84:from]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[yahoo.com:dkim]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[yahoo.com:s=s2048]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.56)[0.556]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[98.137.65.84:from:127.0.2.255]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[98.137.65.84:from]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[98.137.65.84:from]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-ports] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 May 2021 08:00:15 -0000 On 2021-May-2, at 23:37, bob prohaska wrote: > After a successful compile of audio/xoscope on a Pi4 running current a > stream of messages appeared on the console and in the security log > while xoscope was running: >=20 >=20 > +WARNING pid 26370 (xoscope): ioctl sign-extension ioctl = ffffffffc0045006 > +WARNING pid 26370 (xoscope): ioctl sign-extension ioctl = ffffffffc0045005 > +WARNING pid 26370 (xoscope): ioctl sign-extension ioctl = ffffffffc0045002 > +WARNING pid 26370 (xoscope): ioctl sign-extension ioctl = ffffffffc0045006 > +WARNING pid 26370 (xoscope): ioctl sign-extension ioctl = ffffffffc0045005 > +WARNING pid 26370 (xoscope): ioctl sign-extension ioctl = ffffffffc0045002 >=20 > They seem to come at a fairly high rate and clutter the logfiles, but=20= > apart from that nuisance nothing else seemed visibly amiss. >=20 > Are they of any significance? The code from a mid 2021-Mar vintage of main [so: 14] looks like: /* ARGSUSED */ int sys_ioctl(struct thread *td, struct ioctl_args *uap) { u_char smalldata[SYS_IOCTL_SMALL_SIZE] = __aligned(SYS_IOCTL_SMALL_ALIGN); uint32_t com; int arg, error; u_int size; caddr_t data; #ifdef INVARIANTS if (uap->com > 0xffffffff) { printf( "WARNING pid %d (%s): ioctl sign-extension ioctl = %lx\n", td->td_proc->p_pid, td->td_name, uap->com); } #endif com =3D (uint32_t)uap->com; . . . where sys/sys/sysproto.h shows: struct ioctl_args { char fd_l_[PADL_(int)]; int fd; char fd_r_[PADR_(int)]; char com_l_[PADL_(u_long)]; u_long com; char = com_r_[PADR_(u_long)]; char data_l_[PADL_(char *)]; char * data; char = data_r_[PADR_(char *)]; }; So, uap->com is unsigned with 64 bits for aarch64 and the 0xffffffff is converted to match that for the > test (C rules). The assignment to uint32_t com would end up with a truncated value recorded whenever the warning is produced. Thus a value like 0xffffffffc0045006ul ends up with com =3D=3D 0xc0045006u instead. Then looking at the usage of com leads to sys/sys/ioccom.h : . . . /* * Ioctl's have the command encoded in the lower word, and the size of * any in or out parameters in the upper word. The high 3 bits of the * upper word are used to encode the in/out status of the parameter. * * 31 29 28 16 15 8 7 0 * = +---------------------------------------------------------------+ * | I/O | Parameter Length | Command Group | Command = | * = +---------------------------------------------------------------+ */ #define IOCPARM_SHIFT 13 /* number of bits for ioctl size = */ #define IOCPARM_MASK ((1 << IOCPARM_SHIFT) - 1) /* parameter length = mask */ #define IOCPARM_LEN(x) (((x) >> 16) & IOCPARM_MASK) #define IOCBASECMD(x) ((x) & ~(IOCPARM_MASK << 16)) #define IOCGROUP(x) (((x) >> 8) & 0xff) #define IOCPARM_MAX (1 << IOCPARM_SHIFT) /* max size of ioctl */ #define IOC_VOID 0x20000000UL /* no parameters */ #define IOC_OUT 0x40000000UL /* copy out parameters */ #define IOC_IN 0x80000000UL /* copy in parameters */ #define IOC_INOUT (IOC_IN|IOC_OUT)/* copy parameters in and out */ #define IOC_DIRMASK (IOC_VOID|IOC_OUT|IOC_IN)/* mask for IN/OUT/VOID = */ . . . So, com =3D=3D 0xc0045006u ends up with: I/O matching: : IOC_IN | IOC_OUT Command matching (byte): 0x06u Command Group matching (byte): 0x50u Parameter Length matching : 0x0004u While I do not know the specifics for the command and command group encoding, the truncated value seems coherent with the code that is using it. My guess would be xoscope used a signed 32-bit type that got a value with sign extension to 64 bits before the value started being treated as unsigned. If it had used an unsigned type instead, the padding would have been a zero fill instead (presuming that I've guessed right). =3D=3D=3D Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away in early 2018-Mar) From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon May 3 08:30:27 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75D3A62B4B8 for ; Mon, 3 May 2021 08:30:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from SRS0=7ksr=J6=klop.ws=ronald-lists@realworks.nl) Received: from smtp-relay-int.realworks.nl (smtp-relay-int.realworks.nl [194.109.157.24]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FYbl62sPDz4Zhp for ; Mon, 3 May 2021 08:30:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from SRS0=7ksr=J6=klop.ws=ronald-lists@realworks.nl) Date: Mon, 3 May 2021 10:30:23 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=klop.ws; s=rw2; t=1620030624; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to; bh=xOqgCWzFeDn6YFgQYZ4DwyzmLm/Am0jD2gTTgi7wr7E=; b=pylpjihiM6en2zVOnbAOK1zCgsMunlQrXecPf1VQ5sdoO6ZjVkCwI9dJbWgeHbnyEgi70F DnJM9Bu/dOwq4OEgFkhjje1jfBDspS37UPMKcPQVmW5/otkqECWdv6A25TX5lalC19QIGn +EP7/34pXSf/dB+hsmlVlNXcdhh9HTeNLhC/UkqCSN8DTmfnDgY7udo/o6Xn9r01zflKnn 42UVyPNJIKvgU7DNny2pLEYOtfFma4Y2RRCb/QsNEnhZh/U10QRhsC7xjCaBL+Huu67bvU mZ2Lnhsrbin8/ydOuSBcDeAk2otHdUOVnXUHvVAEM7LLO/dXmRL18ZpG9wmBEw== From: Ronald Klop To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Tatsuki Makino Message-ID: <71613459.703.1620030623950@localhost> In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: I thought "pkg updating" would alert me about python...? MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Realworks (558.39.3a03a887657) Importance: Normal X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FYbl62sPDz4Zhp X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=klop.ws header.s=rw2 header.b=pylpjihi; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=klop.ws; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of SRS0=7ksr=J6=klop.ws=ronald-lists@realworks.nl designates 194.109.157.24 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=SRS0=7ksr=J6=klop.ws=ronald-lists@realworks.nl X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.89 / 15.00]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:194.109.157.0/24]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[klop.ws:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; HAS_X_PRIO_THREE(0.00)[3]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.99)[-0.985]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[klop.ws,none]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[ronald-lists@klop.ws,SRS0=7ksr=J6=klop.ws=ronald-lists@realworks.nl]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[freebsd.org,hotmail.com]; RCVD_COUNT_ZERO(0.00)[0]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:3265, ipnet:194.109.0.0/16, country:NL]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[ronald-lists@klop.ws,SRS0=7ksr=J6=klop.ws=ronald-lists@realworks.nl]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[klop.ws:s=rw2]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; MANY_INVISIBLE_PARTS(0.30)[4]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[194.109.157.24:from]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_VERYGOOD(0.00)[194.109.157.24:from]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-ports] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.34 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 May 2021 08:30:27 -0000 Van: Tatsuki Makino Datum: 2 mei 2021 22:36 Aan: Ronald Klop , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Onderwerp: Re: I thought "pkg updating" would alert me about python...? >=20 >=20 > Ronald Klop wrote on 2021/05/03 05:14: > > The UPDATING entry should have said something like "users of lang/pytho= n*" to work. >=20 > The behavior of this is strange. > I have the following python* in my environment. > python, python27, python3, python37 and python38 >=20 > AFFECTS: users of python : not match > AFFECTS: users of pytho? : match > AFFECTS: users of python3 : not match > AFFECTS: users of python* : match > AFFECTS: users of python3[7] : match >=20 > package names are also comparable. > Does it not pattern match if the pattern match symbol ?, [] or * is not i= ncluded? >=20 > Regards. >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 If I read the pkg source correctly it uses regex with some glob-like prepar= ation like converting * to .*.https://github.com/freebsd/pkg/blob/62302ab4b= 4d69528e155ea7b68f058a05d6dffdd/src/updating.c#L71And it indeed checks if t= he word contains regex characters. If not it compares with strcmp. strpbrk(words[i],"^$*|?") =3D=3D NULL What is remarkable is that it compares to "origin". I think origin is the f= ull portname "lang/python". The regex match also matches a substring of ori= gin. This would explain why pytho? matches, but python didn't. NB: this is by looking at the C code for a minute with my rusty C skills. = I might have overlooked something. =F0=9F=98=85 Regards,Ronald From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon May 3 10:42:12 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79DFE62E771; Mon, 3 May 2021 10:42:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mazhe@alkumuna.eu) Received: from smtp4-g21.free.fr (smtp4-g21.free.fr [IPv6:2a01:e0c:1:1599::13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FYfg82L4yz4hF5; Mon, 3 May 2021 10:42:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mazhe@alkumuna.eu) Received: from yggdrasil.alkumuna.eu (unknown [IPv6:2a01:e34:ec17:2560::2]) by smtp4-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A148819F5A9; Mon, 3 May 2021 12:42:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: from gramr.alkumuna.eu ([IPv6:2a01:e34:ec17:2561:62a4:4cff:fe54:b212]) (authenticated bits=0) by yggdrasil.alkumuna.eu (8.16.1/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id 143Ag1XR067470 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 3 May 2021 12:42:01 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mazhe@alkumuna.eu) Date: Mon, 3 May 2021 12:42:00 +0200 From: Matthieu Volat To: LuMiWa via freebsd-ports Cc: LuMiWa , FreeBSD Ports Subject: Re: gdal Message-ID: <20210503124200.6016c5e9@gramr.alkumuna.eu> In-Reply-To: <20210502135545.3a487b8b@dismail.de> References: <20210502135545.3a487b8b@dismail.de> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.8 (GTK+ 2.24.33; amd64-portbld-freebsd13.0) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/0T=DdYli_ZWLlQYhQAsULmQ"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alkumuna.eu; s=default; t=1620038521; bh=f89qGdOko1YMIqPy/GjPoEyT7c4bJAC8MC8/17NDNBw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=A5+DJDEPSE5DZuqlutZH/TFr2/FyBlI3K85Ig1RGr1W2h46KL6Hv+mnJRzOu/oqQL1N1xJczpaPUS8xqEtfwPzpZGb4SFTewVGnIG+arkj+4NpgS8t7cTm6KSpW4/tL5VgvnfLfV6RHEmLZb2lViPLSyYmB+FBHWSQopX5xO80A= X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FYfg82L4yz4hF5 X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 May 2021 10:42:12 -0000 --Sig_/0T=DdYli_ZWLlQYhQAsULmQ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 2 May 2021 13:55:45 -0400 LuMiWa via freebsd-ports wrote: > Hi! >=20 > I have a problem to build graphics/gdal on FreeBSD-13.0-RELEASE: > m::seekp' declared here: type mismatch at 1st parameter ('uint64_t' > (aka 'unsigned long') vs 'GInt64' (aka 'long long')) virtual void > seekp (uint64_t pos) =3D 0; ^ > exrdataset.cpp:495:1: error: unknown type name 'Int64'; did you mean > 'GInt64'? Int64 GDALEXRIOStream::tellg () > ^~~~~ > GInt64 > /usr/ports/graphics/gdal/work/gdal-3.2.2/port/cpl_port.h:267:26: note: > 'GInt64' declared here typedef GIntBig GInt64; > ^ > exrdataset.cpp:497:24: error: unknown type name 'Int64'; did you mean > 'GInt64'? return static_cast(VSIFTellL(m_fp)); > ^~~~~ > GInt64 > /usr/ports/graphics/gdal/work/gdal-3.2.2/port/cpl_port.h:267:26: note: > 'GInt64' declared here typedef GIntBig GInt64; > ^ > exrdataset.cpp:500:30: error: unknown type name 'Int64'; did you mean > 'GInt64'? void GDALEXRIOStream::seekg (Int64 pos) > ^~~~~ > GInt64 > /usr/ports/graphics/gdal/work/gdal-3.2.2/port/cpl_port.h:267:26: note: > 'GInt64' declared here typedef GIntBig GInt64; > ^ > exrdataset.cpp:566:36: error: allocating an object of abstract class > type 'GDALEXRIOStream' poDS->m_pIStream.reset(new GDALEXRIOStream(fp, > osFilename)); ^ > exrdataset.cpp:992:25: error: variable type 'GDALEXRIOStream' is an > abstract class GDALEXRIOStream ostream(fp, pszFilename); > ^ > exrdataset.cpp:1984:32: error: allocating an object of abstract class > type 'GDALEXRIOStream' poDS->m_pOStream.reset(new GDALEXRIOStream(fp, > pszFilename)); ^ > 3 warnings and 14 errors generated. > gmake[4]: *** [../../GDALmake.opt:646: ../o/exrdataset.o] Error 1 > gmake[4]: Leaving directory > '/usr/ports/graphics/gdal/work/gdal-3.2.2/frmts/exr' gmake[3]: *** > [GNUmakefile:15: exr-install-obj] Error 2 gmake[3]: Leaving directory > '/usr/ports/graphics/gdal/work/gdal-3.2.2/frmts' gmake[2]: *** > [GNUmakefile:114: frmts-target] Error 2 gmake[2]: Leaving directory > '/usr/ports/graphics/gdal/work/gdal-3.2.2' *** Error code 1 >=20 > Stop. > make[1]: stopped in /usr/ports/graphics/gdal > *** Error code 1 >=20 > Thank you. >=20 Hi, this happens indeed when you build gdal *without* the EXR option when o= penexr is present at build time. I guess the off option is not passed corre= ctly to the configure script? Cheers, -- Matthieu Volat --Sig_/0T=DdYli_ZWLlQYhQAsULmQ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEE1xv/SVkem9252haa3yo2fFz8JX4FAmCP03gACgkQ3yo2fFz8 JX7+hw//fvgU4Tmk5ac9yPnl+FBGOzArqECyjkS6zqrmN3BV0fEJJc+lrGDl0Sqt d99+muE0m6Df4LnfzzfTWKuAhgVjTP5jE/ZCfDZWI2JfMWiMyYH2bTV5kAxIskXB KLITfaoRuKaHZSASJoJVbrgDCQLwF7CMv3gj9bpJaipcjR1fclg+5RK94DveJZgG a2jl4cK3/3DInzpIjawsuACsFc7eAwBmNah7WD8XTmWyumdq+sKd4IjUSNqtVtnT y6H1l9pUEAeMwcqrnW/IUaaManjHvIkoeRyxHjMVs9FeY9u3tiuU9vETFRm4CPN4 18Zus9ZszJg1GBqFwb/DvrqvJy0cfSkEARUTW5Wwl8cqA/XY94V92Y2zUpPRhM/D 3GmfwYlA09T2agD0V4gcm+XUfUX3TJGh72wpoWTGyqTEuAEbCc2ahliGHJLJjTwL jgxJxxnrkMn9FTzuaiIIyZM5naA4LbN+1hzcwrCed25c63EjOCFAqROHMNcyuD7P NvP4j7if1W9McjxZCTxdEvtpEd7eIsUxrwVzFrmW0DB2H0heYyioiBZ8AdrCymsr SdYKjGqtsqiaSToq+M3hVCKkVEzOOCokLPnXgK9g4SM6OhmBMlc7fXHvOyyaSVtw C2VL3bJyEAN5/fpnz9uKwiIX6fWCfDZi44vfdoeEFmYEmMhb1cQ= =YZRN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/0T=DdYli_ZWLlQYhQAsULmQ-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon May 3 10:53:14 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1896762ED25 for ; Mon, 3 May 2021 10:53:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xavier@groumpf.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FYfvs69zZz4hgj for ; Mon, 3 May 2021 10:53:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xavier@groumpf.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id D239062ED24; Mon, 3 May 2021 10:53:13 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFB0A62EA2C; Mon, 3 May 2021 10:53:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xavier@groumpf.org) Received: from aragorn.amdh.fr (aragorn.groumpf.org [176.31.180.205]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FYfvs4cFrz4hGt; Mon, 3 May 2021 10:53:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xavier@groumpf.org) Received: from numenor.groumpf.org (unknown [78.251.129.10]) by aragorn.amdh.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78A485F750; Mon, 3 May 2021 12:53:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from numenor.groumpf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by numenor.groumpf.org (Postfix) with UTF8SMTP id 3D4B71D55B7; Mon, 3 May 2021 12:53:06 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at groumpf.org Received: from numenor.groumpf.org ([127.0.0.1]) by numenor.groumpf.org (ns3.groumpf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with UTF8LMTP id SYpTf9XbkHoM; Mon, 3 May 2021 12:52:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.100.30] (unknown [192.168.100.30]) by numenor.groumpf.org (Postfix) with UTF8SMTPSA id F2B101D5545; Mon, 3 May 2021 12:52:50 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 3 May 2021 12:52:50 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:89.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/89.0 Subject: Re: gdal Content-Language: en-GB To: Matthieu Volat , LuMiWa via freebsd-ports Cc: LuMiWa , FreeBSD Ports References: <20210502135545.3a487b8b@dismail.de> <20210503124200.6016c5e9@gramr.alkumuna.eu> From: Xavier Humbert In-Reply-To: <20210503124200.6016c5e9@gramr.alkumuna.eu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FYfvs4cFrz4hGt X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 May 2021 10:53:14 -0000 On 03/05/2021 12:42, Matthieu Volat wrote: > Hi, this happens indeed when you build gdal*without* the EXR option when openexr is present at build time. I guess the off option is not passed correctly to the configure script? Hi Mathieu, LuMiWa, I ran in the very same problem, with the *default* (make rmconfig) options. As you mention, enabling EXR option fixes this Cheers, Xavier -- Xavier HUMBERT - Unix/Win/MacOSX Sysadmin/Network Senior Engineer https://www.amdh.fr From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon May 3 12:36:22 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DFC0632082 for ; Mon, 3 May 2021 12:36:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tech-lists@zyxst.net) Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FYjBs2fk7z4mxg for ; Mon, 3 May 2021 12:36:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tech-lists@zyxst.net) Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id E72365C00A6 for ; Mon, 3 May 2021 08:36:19 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 03 May 2021 08:36:19 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zyxst.net; h= date:from:to:subject:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s= fm2; bh=DjhJon0P39kTTYo15OAHVEAKOtecLo7xujr4H0Z753w=; b=j4mqQzIo g4ZrgQXSds+tsgvHUL2jOotbQ5ZQLFyxOTJ364MP3jgPEXC8Z6Zcx71z5ioWVVkE 66pxrMvgqJV14ayIV4gj5F8wLz1zgvDlfQyXrgNv1coTvgMuDfpLLWS3eBiwTdvJ BelGaH9rlc8TTdr7MArek5Dp0XOwDqyR/nqUUSwUUCq7Y4ZbDcFSK59PVWlce+uj 1HH887aENkrbqdxsSe6cHtTo9ESRWH7i/S6nJ/yaI4j9EeH7JQarE1g5tVaVb/vy DZEHczvlAKWmBwnRNwhQT4Bt4eqRBeGzwY75CMBB0QUYOGg+bwr53gpBvYvyr3RV 2yMTZ8upb/lCGQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:message-id :mime-version:subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=DjhJon0P39kTTYo15OAHVEAKOtecL o7xujr4H0Z753w=; b=FkfZKy0+t6T5bVCZ94yQgXMDK2h24Hf44hqAz13TAWT7E qTbm88BB3icu9NlP1stvK8iwM1A0QfRrDsSlIpR1EI/TermEIvkUvIJ+jrOPKcv6 5SoA80xT3Eb+L2LEWTeSU2VJpAppjuk0GaLQF2Oc7azUtHKF9Z85x+xrqdB/CI14 GEoptzrGCWj7opkV/Y0WzRO7yf5ObuxiU2pvBMPfbFu+bOC80GGQY0Faw1Oopgxa OogufdqJWGlInD4W6k3QFtRES//7Sj7GReFIyt0mqASDb4PC5NUPJSvAT9CX4kpU rRxGA872+bjtDB21yHWR7RoTH8FYFBBYJU7vy4bQQ== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrvdefgedgheehucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpeffhffvuffkgggtugesghdtreertd dtvdenucfhrhhomhepthgvtghhqdhlihhsthhsuceothgvtghhqdhlihhsthhsseiihiig shhtrdhnvghtqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeevgffhffdtfeekleelhedtjeelvdfhvd egieejveffgfduvdfhteegjeeujeeuieenucfkphepkeelrddugeehrddutddtrddufeel necuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthgvtg hhqdhlihhsthhsseiihiigshhtrdhnvght X-ME-Proxy: Received: from cloud.zyxst.net (v007.zyxst.net [89.145.100.139]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA for ; Mon, 3 May 2021 08:36:19 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 3 May 2021 13:36:18 +0100 From: tech-lists To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Warning: (misc/mc-nox11): Error: Duplicated origin for mc-nox11-4.8.26: misc/mc-nox11 AND misc/mc Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="TW42wHAyB9OyDxri" Content-Disposition: inline X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FYjBs2fk7z4mxg X-Spamd-Bar: ----- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=zyxst.net header.s=fm2 header.b=j4mqQzIo; dkim=pass header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm2 header.b=FkfZKy0+; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of tech-lists@zyxst.net designates 66.111.4.25 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=tech-lists@zyxst.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-5.70 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_GOOD(0.00)[66.111.4.25:from]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:66.111.4.25]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[zyxst.net:+,messagingengine.com:+]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; SIGNED_PGP(-2.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[66.111.4.25:from]; ASN(0.00)[asn:11403, ipnet:66.111.4.0/24, country:US]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[66.111.4.25:from]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[zyxst.net:s=fm2,messagingengine.com:s=fm2]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.20)[multipart/signed,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[zyxst.net]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[66.111.4.25:from:127.0.2.255]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-ports] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 May 2021 12:36:22 -0000 --TW42wHAyB9OyDxri Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, not sure where this goes. Seems to be a ports tree error, so posting here. full error from poudriere: [00:00:24] Warning: (misc/mc-nox11): Error: Duplicated origin for mc-nox11-4.8.26: misc/mc-nox11 AND misc/mc. Rerun with -v to see which ports are depending on these. [00:00:41] Error: Fatal errors encountered gathering initial ports metadata [00:00:41] Cleaning up [00:00:41] Unmounting file systems This is from a fresh tree as of 3rd March @1230 UTC and the poudriere jail is 12.2-p6 --=20 J. --TW42wHAyB9OyDxri Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEE8n3tWhxW11Ccvv9/s8o7QhFzNAUFAmCP7jkACgkQs8o7QhFz NAUiwBAArhEqYkpFGyaC+/c4ohnnixHPwgZP4zMmuhNUntAF2PeCgBMgCocSzkHC Hx389+M+nqZ98u6CW55sOqyr+xZjnFEICdSBNQZl3o84RCHn18vFW2mY+HcPhQX6 SMtgTTe4X8UUia1S+g8c9dBTzPyKZSWXe6pK+ZRJVEOZYUAanAfOSHgQbE65yHpu 8RKCqYO5Np3MQpvK3+25e/EurGn+IOss/z0kQ1SDwXojzVcyGpM8qTSmBfsnEjhD 9eGPNXT70PeptCT7n++3qA47fQbGn1u/F4hGlWAQCo6PC/gSvyh8/mP5lnQnzNS4 obbeUbtxQNseC44w2JQo1dbADV8RX02nXetkH2thi8A5dt5oUy9Er6A9ILQphi/N DZxsw8aJ4Pif51gkkZqnZz5XN+RvZDCEXTMSTd9dKanBUIUukXs4iYYV1dQx60R6 WkJUnfHYPwlfOR4qQrY5IN0eBMFNy9UQx40PteCeArO6IPhNIlzuv5HtlQbZ5VD0 Xu7azGmEXYihatBPi7LfLYuuk9mn8f0ndoQFKxQM+WuBfezF9pJ7TS09XX1mCB1W ZijJ0x8AB8dFpb/1EQHvPFE4LEHO3G6OU1L80iNJdTICbl2MHgFZTgNB5XtreCwk eQjLxA8IQe7uET0AXzuDSNcSrlYD8uoTQWdS+B/whCAYjI0xv9I= =/tDc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --TW42wHAyB9OyDxri-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon May 3 13:01:56 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 068496329BE for ; Mon, 3 May 2021 13:01:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mat@freebsd.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [96.47.72.83]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FYjmM6l3kz4p4R for ; Mon, 3 May 2021 13:01:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mat@freebsd.org) Received: from mail.j.mat.cc (owncloud.cube.mat.cc [IPv6:2a01:678:4:1::228]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.mat.cc", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) (Authenticated sender: mat/mail) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C328E27BB6 for ; Mon, 3 May 2021 13:01:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mat@freebsd.org) Received: from aching.in.mat.cc (unknown [IPv6:2a01:678:ab:50:cd46:6e6a:156b:afa6]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mat@mat.cc) by mail.j.mat.cc (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A3ED4942D80 for ; Mon, 3 May 2021 13:01:54 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 3 May 2021 15:01:53 +0200 From: Mathieu Arnold To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Warning: (misc/mc-nox11): Error: Duplicated origin for mc-nox11-4.8.26: misc/mc-nox11 AND misc/mc Message-ID: <20210503130153.shsu2xrcfdzsefzu@aching.in.mat.cc> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ri4qjjlnfn3jygrf" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 May 2021 13:01:56 -0000 --ri4qjjlnfn3jygrf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, May 03, 2021 at 01:36:18PM +0100, tech-lists wrote: > Hi, not sure where this goes. Seems to be a ports tree error, so posting > here. >=20 > full error from poudriere: >=20 > [00:00:24] Warning: (misc/mc-nox11): Error: Duplicated origin for > mc-nox11-4.8.26: misc/mc-nox11 AND misc/mc. Rerun with -v to see which > ports are depending on these. > [00:00:41] Error: Fatal errors encountered gathering initial ports > metadata > [00:00:41] Cleaning up > [00:00:41] Unmounting file systems >=20 > This is from a fresh tree as of 3rd March @1230 UTC and the poudriere > jail is 12.2-p6 The problem was in misc/mc, fixed in commit 614b5da0cb87. --=20 Mathieu Arnold --ri4qjjlnfn3jygrf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQKTBAABCgB9FiEEVhwchfRfuV0unqO5KesJApEdfgIFAmCP9DxfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDU2 MUMxQzg1RjQ1RkI5NUQyRTlFQTNCOTI5RUIwOTAyOTExRDdFMDIACgkQKesJApEd fgKepxAArHz679o8b/2Ey1hvc5EeoiNASPHwyA/Ev4zZTzV51k/k0rUZiTjuJvXw Y0597ErC3a0KBGNd+eDEQ8sHvHCNvIvZvNLIfI+lxl/FogzfK9IUjmqyIU8RNr6T sHP76uGFwJndH/SzKDo4dGPQqV1rPbWbI5PV6EkR3HocziIr24mjaNhNVLouKsds GZN2SrOK2jevQLZ+GLVKERlSeIjfKojoL4igNgRsVRb6tEl3dL7ymWid0xQd5gCc i6djSNb6PZuiOhTqF12Tc15Zu79N93+Dc4qBgHwtdmd3fJhpfwtlXL5cRNxCcVpC /XKpmEy/qebmIE5dJVFVD6cadCc7CqKP9odcK6jCTHY1ME9o6Q2XAqkjjKSR9I1Z mNQv71I8IN1IzazM1vexhvzV9wBTNmrfech6tfnl9I55naBKThcyMhilDjTJER3T ZVY+UMklk1Wydkl1VquUs72un4NMLg1EMTgkUbjjtXqQZgG4PaY2qOy0yuzyBC9P EHqJDvTiwiGbElqqMU47uvCY0HhygkHqtABhMBGdMBAnoC4mSB9ctlTb4HvR7T/l 4F0Dtjaoi11zF3uCVPosW4yxRnlXyD6j87sdFH0GGif4MMtLBWbdK6FYCV/gV9Jk PTaSRCHpoLJWaKju0h5p9UXFRoOs7dzWy3j/X08eksUfA/ewKCc= =T3GM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ri4qjjlnfn3jygrf-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon May 3 15:23:40 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 325D3635597; Mon, 3 May 2021 15:23:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd@www.zefox.net) Received: from www.zefox.net (www.zefox.net [50.1.20.27]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "www.zefox.com", Issuer "www.zefox.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FYmvv0fy9z4v5Z; Mon, 3 May 2021 15:23:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd@www.zefox.net) Received: from www.zefox.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by www.zefox.net (8.16.1/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 143FNdei037422 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 3 May 2021 08:23:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fbsd@www.zefox.net) Received: (from fbsd@localhost) by www.zefox.net (8.16.1/8.15.2/Submit) id 143FNdYA037421; Mon, 3 May 2021 08:23:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fbsd) Date: Mon, 3 May 2021 08:23:39 -0700 From: bob prohaska To: bob prohaska Cc: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Xoscope nuisance console messages on Pi4 running -current Message-ID: <20210503152339.GA37236@www.zefox.net> References: <20210503063701.GA34665@www.zefox.net> <263BF9DF-B22B-4579-9667-AFCB7D2D667C@yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <263BF9DF-B22B-4579-9667-AFCB7D2D667C@yahoo.com> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FYmvv0fy9z4v5Z X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of fbsd@www.zefox.net has no SPF policy when checking 50.1.20.27) smtp.mailfrom=fbsd@www.zefox.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.05 / 15.00]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; WWW_DOT_DOMAIN(0.50)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[zefox.net]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[50.1.20.27:from]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[50.1.20.27:from:127.0.2.255]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.95)[-0.955]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7065, ipnet:50.1.16.0/20, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-arm,freebsd-ports]; MID_RHS_WWW(0.50)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 May 2021 15:23:40 -0000 On Mon, May 03, 2021 at 01:00:03AM -0700, Mark Millard via freebsd-ports wrote: [detailed code tour omitted] > > My guess would be xoscope used a signed 32-bit type > that got a value with sign extension to 64 bits > before the value started being treated as unsigned. > If it had used an unsigned type instead, the padding > would have been a zero fill instead (presuming that > I've guessed right). > So this was an artifact of compiling a 32 program on a 64 bit machine? And, perhaps unnecessary use of signed versus unsigned integers? This begs two more questions: It is harmless (seemingly not always), and would it go away if compiled and run on a 32 bit machine, say armv7? Many thanks for the detailed explanation, but I'll admit not understanding much more than the quoted part above 8-( bob prohaska From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon May 3 18:08:51 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 517DA63971A for ; Mon, 3 May 2021 18:08:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marklmi@yahoo.com) Received: from sonic311-24.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (sonic311-24.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com [98.137.65.205]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FYrZV3B9gz3L3Q for ; Mon, 3 May 2021 18:08:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marklmi@yahoo.com) X-SONIC-DKIM-SIGN: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1620065328; bh=o4jn+sW9LUeiwJFNYpT3OX+GqneQqlxx2wwCm4x9F78=; h=X-Sonic-MF:Subject:From:Date:To:From:Subject; b=QbB07PDf/6n/ygWvxb1GK/fctLgIVV4ufak3E+qZJVp5bmlDe5IGsNNjs+wPzxWLEymctMUo2w0mw2nS3osFtQVFFksS5K49tZdr/rKe9cbh0ZInSN92J5HFPA194y05DpL1A42AWTweWgG5gZt2qSrQ7JaLv+EdS9OyvJhPMJZozMe7PdXJ9JvjvZB13dJQVRztFEsd9mrjzQ51CNTTYRbJJDK7Pj4VpnQYhcAFwof5wJBBu9h4JWfFctuLS5SZRRtyQuDuGgvHwl1ky1i/0xrBK3c1AmkA84+HME2X2mn5w6C6kdikQcWudg+PsrsZpIEqJQwwOP9umEkkRckGoQ== X-YMail-OSG: bCMUCyAVM1nij2PvlYg6oItmKYYM.nHJxcFsjK5cA0nCQg1u2B3.RhXLtT3cpgT J1D1W.Tct.Ff5GlqyzJden43cp8VkukkcDMvX6MZBJVkVG1h9qj_7AUqOimHJLWISLTcoTP8tqo5 RsZYU8H003Hy9u.tFqvagJMnNf3MEEt2cqwS6tIdUbUlwI7o6VdV6l8Mh4DsLv5TSDeHnPllCqRT SOzuKeWVlwU8cDSAsLKPB2sgH1TULDsOjpWcLB7VH08B3zX9Xpp6Xlz8OjGZnwpSCYxaQvHxwDG1 8sznQzZQQxPR4KMycC_1tWBiK4f8NTb.VVWTPIrT3Zb9rMqjW0rpYH5R8Xqg4drzivGor7mVlFjR sz_wHNXS1PV1aKx19r3djorGgkCBoDNbiT5vIwvc._87dPvudycUxMZ.mnXiNi0sRMAXQy7ATKqY DR_nIdLQROCunMOMnqNneRUEOwHjc3VPUwubv_9WK90ohHtFuDpcsjOITcZkTiNYOeTcj2mMvzJu Fn1SvuLd2lFDHFx0GmODq5xYety.htl1cpOjQhbnhXI9qXAuDOwx4nOvVThLBs9eULJ8lYUnpEnu C.bG9gYmTG9CMjzsQX1ELXS_b0HQ5Sm.baZO7M0W0Kz5dsoHdqOHueCmnQYqI_SnWWhHqZ6Vo6EC ruR_2GB_f1KE4rjEy5Q_Q3amEXjyZxUN4E.JK0jPXWkmUGCHgXOsRnVA5bQdYAnEDD191MBjsp07 RxIqwCMtj5a0QzA5rpGTTNLFXmcSLtioQNqb5St9kdBxJlzGf4cpdazeOlpGcm_Ab4dw0c9evpiG smK9iqnDLIa0s9e58brvileuhMlEb7JpkCw9oXr5yqohwyX1Q6biChLxZEy0LdjKpKU1Png6hzNp tF2HyXToq9NQVJIcLQta.bD9aPOCzS6DPayygcHAtSUeHtsHnylcj65LAOHVfEN2Tvoro.wcinoq moj.uzjHWUA7fJVu09D1yzkjn2IzlDzvMfU3GuyX7Ma6gfGgYRzi57Nux3ywpRva_fZxFXdlscJp jEak1vAxYpjCwZOiX_CCaDFAYRunCDNN_aD777o3AC.g4xZYrB7Uh.2MrOhHlKiuehXpRIW_n6ye 3XuYTElc4T.a63C6.mcCFfAbWlL_qR_LlHrUflxNrfWgGm7L.slZsXFlxCglqpc6NX3.MYQFDLrr z0tnAafhDNZT0.DEErcdFtq59dfhQ8NCjvZnt3oB1nu.EZyI_6ZtpZcDPj5itR9VewDqgLtyygqZ vNC8Njdabq72T7M.17GapyQaUsGR_eLSl69eeLCl2BnRXOODBUNXxl57v2iIqAXlQ5bmJYJdALqQ oxR_WCXGImxA4_qJ3dAwwN0m94bTa5QMi99F8pKUeitn5m7os3FhU1Zc_23pSN5XQ_l1jX9dFyfF SripY2hP7waapwrgsk34rHrvcoJOOhIy.v9Awn1L7wp5AfFzHy2MwzB9CXw.sxMOO5.t8Bjd9SUU UJnk3.weeRv9UxhUZ8E2wnj8hW4sVkwtaMyyz4vHMHD2Mi1orRnuZcaSQ2ZauRGe9W.uSSSdKwiw P5Ca_VTiV4yksE1OVZeEl9owGR5xFA9bDcabyBKiAqaJy6kcOucjPVZycmBQwZMpa6cwLkr6TMXz W1wMIvLce_qEmeA7cqbKyIYPscWQZYikAZiyaMZzdB8.nse1m67Ov1RTDRvJFD4KeAO_44UpOFHL Lsyq9p4hAgYCabWRXoXltTwf9clsBCXzfGpdZXWi3UG3hIU6dZ7qKvAYMikSPr6IAr9agLqtFcP6 yTSiy7sp0lVeZxzCdDpd1aoKBTyS1HyF9ZQcd6PsA7YBJuAJd_gIdCNoojLIGYZoA2m1wr9QIWVa oYP6LyBUM2nscQLdshVa6M_ayXrwjEFIKaSRg2GBaIc77c1exzEXTbrTKQPPLvyBuiuin5nRbJsx .qnATieXrc1s4CeAWI_js3feD.LXkirpEl_TI5LKEfdbn7kwxZ0o.yJCqRieGIc57htYf54xUVay tts1YpdudgkGugQx7LODa_1qc0aExvJXB4iaKWOjaFgqbbXG8ZKbEvobWjleuvxjedLTbm8EJGVv xrdvd95P1DK39fSPoA7Z6KfksYAUnHePtVaKnRzpZRAnwatgKvC6Sl.icXsU.6wspuVoaGaQ6ZFE cOEo.h9wOcXwU.TVjra0gmD0vPFBjtiS53QPhGb6rnQN.EMNatNLkAuZ5vJQoYXGCjd3t8SpkOVm 5wJQ2SZM45JE7T.3iQlMPLGqDhSRKDfUoEjiNyiWFfYNeKLfLpWYh2HEn7JJLajGKFv_AGwM5bMq 5Nc.VRMNxODO7khOOXabYE5hTBNCs4puNXzJTQgRMXIpjmAan93.zFOKM2P6I6VcWNxQmKLqwu9o sWNIpGzl51K49adijtglgWeZ8zxjk402zTlJbhnVSc33v4NCOeZqRTF9Uv5KhlNVkC6NMgSIQwUE 4u2AMz7_d1pDpJ96DESPKlKIokFjYFPqBAGratOaL_ZF4g2tGbCWkx5JA69Tsjr2Z8hzNUseOcl3 M.VhjEYC44l1hgUy1lGC5lyzJtfGjZf6iX8_4DS1J7aAFEFUnxtuLYdESPbWdsn5eiLaqnw6uV8G RRQVt4JQu X-Sonic-MF: Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic311.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with HTTP; Mon, 3 May 2021 18:08:48 +0000 Received: by kubenode565.mail-prod1.omega.gq1.yahoo.com (VZM Hermes SMTP Server) with ESMTPA ID 084bed7bbccb67bba36f5590fe97e22b; Mon, 03 May 2021 18:08:46 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.60.0.2.21\)) Subject: Re: Xoscope nuisance console messages on Pi4 running -current From: Mark Millard In-Reply-To: <20210503152339.GA37236@www.zefox.net> Date: Mon, 3 May 2021 11:08:45 -0700 Cc: freebsd-arm , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <20210503063701.GA34665@www.zefox.net> <263BF9DF-B22B-4579-9667-AFCB7D2D667C@yahoo.com> <20210503152339.GA37236@www.zefox.net> To: bob prohaska X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.60.0.2.21) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FYrZV3B9gz3L3Q X-Spamd-Bar: --- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.50 / 15.00]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[yahoo.com]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ptr:yahoo.com]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[yahoo.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[yahoo.com,reject]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[yahoo.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:36647, ipnet:98.137.64.0/20, country:US]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[98.137.65.205:from]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[yahoo.com:dkim]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[yahoo.com:s=s2048]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[98.137.65.205:from:127.0.2.255]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[98.137.65.205:from]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[98.137.65.205:from]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-ports] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 May 2021 18:08:51 -0000 On 2021-May-3, at 08:23, bob prohaska wrote: > On Mon, May 03, 2021 at 01:00:03AM -0700, Mark Millard via = freebsd-ports wrote: > [detailed code tour omitted] >=20 >>=20 >> My guess would be xoscope used a signed 32-bit type >> that got a value with sign extension to 64 bits >> before the value started being treated as unsigned. >> If it had used an unsigned type instead, the padding >> would have been a zero fill instead (presuming that >> I've guessed right). >>=20 >=20 > So this was an artifact of compiling a 32 program on a 64 bit machine? I've no evidence that you were building the port for armv7 instead of aarch64. If you were, it would be good to report that. Otherwise, I expect the code produced was 64-bit (aarch64) and the rest is just how the program's source code is set up. > And, perhaps unnecessary use of signed versus unsigned integers?=20 That is what I expect is going on in the xoscope source code. (I've not looked.) > This begs two more questions: It is harmless (seemingly not always),=20= I doubt that it is a problem (other than the messages). As I wrote: QUOTE While I do not know the specifics for the command and command group encoding, the truncated value seems coherent with the code that is using it. END QUOTE > and would it go away if compiled and run on a 32 bit machine, say = armv7? "long int" and "int" are both 32-bits on armv7 (unsigned or signed) so no extra 1-bits would be produced by sign extension. So I do not expect the messages would be generated when executed via armv7 code. As far as I can tell, the program likely works (ignoring the messages) for aarch64. The messages are from the FreeBSD you are using being a debug build with INVARIANTS enabled. A non-debug FreeBSD build would not report the messages. (It is possible to buildworld for armv7 and install it into a directory tree and use chroot into that directory tree to run armv7 code on the RPi4's. This should not produce the messages --and if it did then there would be FreeBSD code to change for that kind of context.) > Many thanks for the detailed explanation, but I'll admit not = understanding > much more than the quoted part above 8-( =3D=3D=3D Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away in early 2018-Mar) From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon May 3 19:22:04 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B61D863AD65 for ; Mon, 3 May 2021 19:22:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jkeenan@pobox.com) Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com (pb-smtp1.pobox.com [64.147.108.70]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FYtBz6Wnhz3P8H for ; Mon, 3 May 2021 19:22:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jkeenan@pobox.com) Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DAFDC8F7D; Mon, 3 May 2021 15:22:02 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jkeenan@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=to:cc:from :subject:message-id:date:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=bHdeNcWMNCjks+iTzCO7HIn4f LEvRoc09iEF1yn7Gm8=; b=STjQBtB7uYG+SS36qLGk2Dtxl28AgsomATnK+2LuH jR8e1oVjKWIfHxCXkjM1HD81lIlZqkQRjKkg8fL+t8d2Ce6RHJGYBH7aQ/esoSHE mwWLYc8ns6bK0GAgYi99osOOk7WIw7yazyYdae7qXYncktvnhrc3CoWKJvuJNL6r 6w= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26790C8F7C; Mon, 3 May 2021 15:22:02 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jkeenan@pobox.com) Received: from [192.168.1.4] (unknown [24.185.115.142]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2785EC8F7A; Mon, 3 May 2021 15:22:01 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jkeenan@pobox.com) To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, vovkasm@gmail.com Cc: Tim Bunce From: James E Keenan Subject: p5-Devel-NYTProf: version 6.09 now available Message-ID: <9f8c9fa7-99c2-8c7c-2910-e4f8cc0810aa@pobox.com> Date: Mon, 3 May 2021 15:22:00 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Pobox-Relay-ID: D5F379E8-AC44-11EB-BD75-D152C8D8090B-57062903!pb-smtp1.pobox.com X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FYtBz6Wnhz3P8H X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=pobox.com header.s=sasl header.b=STjQBtB7; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=pobox.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of jkeenan@pobox.com designates 64.147.108.70 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=jkeenan@pobox.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.08 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:64.147.108.0/24]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[pobox.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[pobox.com,none]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.98)[-0.979]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[freebsd.org,gmail.com]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[24.185.115.142:received]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[64.147.108.70:from]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[pobox.com:dkim]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[64.147.108.70:from]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[pobox.com:s=sasl]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; ASN(0.00)[asn:11403, ipnet:64.147.108.0/24, country:US]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[64.147.108.70:from:127.0.2.255]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-ports] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 May 2021 19:22:04 -0000 I have released version 6.09 of this Perl library to CPAN. The FreeBSD port is currently at version 6.06, which will not pass all its tests with the upcoming perl-5.34.0 release. Please consider upgrading the port and let me know any problems you encounter. Thank you very much. Jim Keenan From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon May 3 19:54:38 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B347063C133 for ; Mon, 3 May 2021 19:54:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from se@freebsd.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::24b:4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FYtwZ4cTdz3Qmv; Mon, 3 May 2021 19:54:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from se@freebsd.org) Received: from Stefans-MBP-449.fritz.box (p200300cd5f1fe9007117440609eb3937.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [IPv6:2003:cd:5f1f:e900:7117:4406:9eb:3937]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: se/mail) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 293202A9D1; Mon, 3 May 2021 19:54:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from se@freebsd.org) To: Mathieu Arnold Cc: FreeBSD ports References: <2c1ab5d2-d885-8f8d-94dd-99d0a5559a88@freebsd.org> <20210503070134.bydnbc2eah7st2on@aching.in.mat.cc> From: Stefan Esser Subject: Re: [SOLVED?] Recovery of deleted ports fails due to pre-commit checks Message-ID: <6041a16c-a114-2896-7162-39b59110b782@freebsd.org> Date: Mon, 3 May 2021 21:54:36 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210503070134.bydnbc2eah7st2on@aching.in.mat.cc> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="bBwAWiA3hcE9ZDvlq083mINrt2zr4hhc7" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 May 2021 19:54:38 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --bBwAWiA3hcE9ZDvlq083mINrt2zr4hhc7 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="ioC2Ic56X3O0ROVYFZLWwzFdUSHaKnG9a"; protected-headers="v1" From: Stefan Esser To: Mathieu Arnold Cc: FreeBSD ports Message-ID: <6041a16c-a114-2896-7162-39b59110b782@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: [SOLVED?] Recovery of deleted ports fails due to pre-commit checks References: <2c1ab5d2-d885-8f8d-94dd-99d0a5559a88@freebsd.org> <20210503070134.bydnbc2eah7st2on@aching.in.mat.cc> In-Reply-To: <20210503070134.bydnbc2eah7st2on@aching.in.mat.cc> --ioC2Ic56X3O0ROVYFZLWwzFdUSHaKnG9a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Am 03.05.21 um 09:01 schrieb Mathieu Arnold: > On Sat, May 01, 2021 at 09:01:02PM +0200, Stefan Esser wrote: >> The recovery of deleted ports in their previous form is rejected >> by the pre-commit checks on the repository server: >> >> remote: >> remote: =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D >> remote: Do not commit ports without TIMESTAMP in their distinfo files.= >> remote: Rerun make makesum to add it. >> remote: =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D >> remote: >> >> I have tried to revert the deletion with unchanged files and then >> updated the ports' Makefiles and distinfo files in a later commit. >> >> Pushing those commits all together fails with the message above, >> and in order to not confuse GIT, deleted files should be committed >> first, before applying any changes. >=20 > This is not needed at all, Git cannot get confused by something it has > no knowledge of. Once a file is deleted, or moved, the history tracking= > stops. I wanted to re-connect the resurrected files to the history of the port. And that works best, if unmodified files are committed first, changes applied and committed thereafter. Did you try "git log multimedia/transcode"? The history is there, back to 2002. --ioC2Ic56X3O0ROVYFZLWwzFdUSHaKnG9a-- --bBwAWiA3hcE9ZDvlq083mINrt2zr4hhc7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="OpenPGP_signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="OpenPGP_signature" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- wsB5BAABCAAjFiEEo3HqZZwL7MgrcVMTR+u171r99UQFAmCQVPwFAwAAAAAACgkQR+u171r99UTn tAf/S0rp6LkHmXTdLp9ockNLLIgyxZXyVvG4QPG1icQbMZi1ancHt/chJ2bRnro52Ym9D1CRmicn CozA2BO9HLn5faqrgFncARM41BI37N5xzLrH75sFcNha3nXIOaKR06uhZObFnDK/edH2YXTepiXP Rvcz9w2LeegIbWM6tnWs3HaCeY7Q+P0/1kpe3+JRMBgVY7yzg4uIfdtnOVkKg8RKvNMHSQY5nDU9 M+lqgSx4p6d4hyeDHsPRjKBYUk3k/zv4vGGwC8F962fcvzRyljZA2k3qOmv+EnkImp/9D8a3LS6o b0faEGPg4J3GCKT3NLr+OdUxtCV7zxnU0n8sySvgig== =i26p -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --bBwAWiA3hcE9ZDvlq083mINrt2zr4hhc7-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon May 3 21:26:48 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A46363DFD7 for ; Mon, 3 May 2021 21:26:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lumiwa@dismail.de) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FYwyw2Vbpz3l2c for ; Mon, 3 May 2021 21:26:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lumiwa@dismail.de) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 53F4063E1C9; Mon, 3 May 2021 21:26:48 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 529A963E05D; Mon, 3 May 2021 21:26:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lumiwa@dismail.de) Received: from mx1.dismail.de (mx1.dismail.de [78.46.223.134]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA512 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mx1.dismail.de", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FYwyv6vTgz3lS1; Mon, 3 May 2021 21:26:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lumiwa@dismail.de) Received: from mx1.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 522c2fa2; Mon, 3 May 2021 23:26:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp1.dismail.de ( [10.240.26.11]) by mx1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 5e660b0e; Mon, 3 May 2021 23:26:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp1.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id bfa8a9d3; Mon, 3 May 2021 23:26:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: by dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 4434b106 (TLSv1.3:AEAD-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO); Mon, 3 May 2021 23:26:43 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 3 May 2021 17:26:38 -0400 From: LuMiWa To: Matthieu Volat Cc: LuMiWa via freebsd-ports , FreeBSD Ports Subject: Re: gdal Message-ID: <20210503172638.44b4ab75@dismail.de> In-Reply-To: <20210503124200.6016c5e9@gramr.alkumuna.eu> References: <20210502135545.3a487b8b@dismail.de> <20210503124200.6016c5e9@gramr.alkumuna.eu> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.8 (GTK+ 2.24.33; amd64-portbld-freebsd13.0) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FYwyv6vTgz3lS1 X-Spamd-Bar: ---- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 May 2021 21:26:48 -0000 On Mon, 3 May 2021 12:42:00 +0200 Matthieu Volat wrote: > On Sun, 2 May 2021 13:55:45 -0400 > LuMiWa via freebsd-ports wrote: >=20 > > Hi! > >=20 > > I have a problem to build graphics/gdal on FreeBSD-13.0-RELEASE: > > m::seekp' declared here: type mismatch at 1st parameter ('uint64_t' > > (aka 'unsigned long') vs 'GInt64' (aka 'long long')) virtual void > > seekp (uint64_t pos) =3D 0; ^ > > exrdataset.cpp:495:1: error: unknown type name 'Int64'; did you mean > > 'GInt64'? Int64 GDALEXRIOStream::tellg () > > ^~~~~ > > GInt64 > > /usr/ports/graphics/gdal/work/gdal-3.2.2/port/cpl_port.h:267:26: > > note: 'GInt64' declared here typedef GIntBig GInt64; > > ^ > > exrdataset.cpp:497:24: error: unknown type name 'Int64'; did you > > mean 'GInt64'? return static_cast(VSIFTellL(m_fp)); > > ^~~~~ > > GInt64 > > /usr/ports/graphics/gdal/work/gdal-3.2.2/port/cpl_port.h:267:26: > > note: 'GInt64' declared here typedef GIntBig GInt64; > > ^ > > exrdataset.cpp:500:30: error: unknown type name 'Int64'; did you > > mean 'GInt64'? void GDALEXRIOStream::seekg (Int64 pos) > > ^~~~~ > > GInt64 > > /usr/ports/graphics/gdal/work/gdal-3.2.2/port/cpl_port.h:267:26: > > note: 'GInt64' declared here typedef GIntBig GInt64; > > ^ > > exrdataset.cpp:566:36: error: allocating an object of abstract class > > type 'GDALEXRIOStream' poDS->m_pIStream.reset(new > > GDALEXRIOStream(fp, osFilename)); ^ > > exrdataset.cpp:992:25: error: variable type 'GDALEXRIOStream' is an > > abstract class GDALEXRIOStream ostream(fp, pszFilename); > > ^ > > exrdataset.cpp:1984:32: error: allocating an object of abstract > > class type 'GDALEXRIOStream' poDS->m_pOStream.reset(new > > GDALEXRIOStream(fp, pszFilename)); ^ > > 3 warnings and 14 errors generated. > > gmake[4]: *** [../../GDALmake.opt:646: ../o/exrdataset.o] Error 1 > > gmake[4]: Leaving directory > > '/usr/ports/graphics/gdal/work/gdal-3.2.2/frmts/exr' gmake[3]: *** > > [GNUmakefile:15: exr-install-obj] Error 2 gmake[3]: Leaving > > directory '/usr/ports/graphics/gdal/work/gdal-3.2.2/frmts' > > gmake[2]: *** [GNUmakefile:114: frmts-target] Error 2 gmake[2]: > > Leaving directory '/usr/ports/graphics/gdal/work/gdal-3.2.2' *** > > Error code 1 > >=20 > > Stop. > > make[1]: stopped in /usr/ports/graphics/gdal > > *** Error code 1 > >=20 > > Thank you. > >=20 >=20 > Hi, this happens indeed when you build gdal *without* the EXR option > when openexr is present at build time. I guess the off option is not > passed correctly to the configure script? >=20 > Cheers, >=20 > -- Matthieu Volat Thank you very much. --=20 =E2=80=9CTwo things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm= not sure about the universe.=E2=80=9D =E2=80=95 Albert Einstein=20 From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue May 4 09:46:59 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D8A162BBD2 for ; Tue, 4 May 2021 09:46:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mat@freebsd.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::24b:4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FZFNz1xGyz4pPr; Tue, 4 May 2021 09:46:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mat@freebsd.org) Received: from mail.j.mat.cc (owncloud.cube.mat.cc [79.143.240.228]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.mat.cc", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) (Authenticated sender: mat/mail) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1A19815F1; Tue, 4 May 2021 09:46:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mat@freebsd.org) Received: from aching.in.mat.cc (unknown [IPv6:2a01:678:ab:0:3356:ef6b:256f:d0c6]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mat@mat.cc) by mail.j.mat.cc (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AEAC4942D80; Tue, 4 May 2021 09:46:56 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 4 May 2021 11:46:53 +0200 From: Mathieu Arnold To: Stefan Esser Cc: Mathieu Arnold , FreeBSD ports Subject: Re: [SOLVED?] Recovery of deleted ports fails due to pre-commit checks Message-ID: <20210504094653.3m27ucqa3hotsusw@aching.in.mat.cc> References: <2c1ab5d2-d885-8f8d-94dd-99d0a5559a88@freebsd.org> <20210503070134.bydnbc2eah7st2on@aching.in.mat.cc> <6041a16c-a114-2896-7162-39b59110b782@freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="m4sqvfwinasof6ph" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6041a16c-a114-2896-7162-39b59110b782@freebsd.org> X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 May 2021 09:46:59 -0000 --m4sqvfwinasof6ph Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, May 03, 2021 at 09:54:36PM +0200, Stefan Esser wrote: > Am 03.05.21 um 09:01 schrieb Mathieu Arnold: > > On Sat, May 01, 2021 at 09:01:02PM +0200, Stefan Esser wrote: > >> The recovery of deleted ports in their previous form is rejected > >> by the pre-commit checks on the repository server: > >> > >> remote: > >> remote: =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > >> remote: Do not commit ports without TIMESTAMP in their distinfo files. > >> remote: Rerun make makesum to add it. > >> remote: =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > >> remote: > >> > >> I have tried to revert the deletion with unchanged files and then > >> updated the ports' Makefiles and distinfo files in a later commit. > >> > >> Pushing those commits all together fails with the message above, > >> and in order to not confuse GIT, deleted files should be committed > >> first, before applying any changes. > >=20 > > This is not needed at all, Git cannot get confused by something it has > > no knowledge of. Once a file is deleted, or moved, the history tracking > > stops. >=20 > I wanted to re-connect the resurrected files to the history of the port. > And that works best, if unmodified files are committed first, changes > applied and committed thereafter. >=20 > Did you try "git log multimedia/transcode"? >=20 > The history is there, back to 2002. Yeah, but this has nothing to do with you commiting unmodified files. Git does not track file renames or moves (or resurrection), it blindly looks at what you told it and goes as far as it can find things. --=20 Mathieu Arnold --m4sqvfwinasof6ph Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQKTBAABCgB9FiEEVhwchfRfuV0unqO5KesJApEdfgIFAmCRGAlfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDU2 MUMxQzg1RjQ1RkI5NUQyRTlFQTNCOTI5RUIwOTAyOTExRDdFMDIACgkQKesJApEd fgKjSg/9FxrZgGvWK7U+YXALgKXKWY1dMxF8UdgODKyLfnrG/JgEotF6K3Zi7MJJ 1Dm4WtbZxyB1/SbdaNSGD2+qfmJrWhV4Q2hh8dMLNrufVjKQtyjktZLO3X+B08iz UcGF1UcvjLPeAiS9xGTdh8zrLiXtHgovEY9LGkqkdgRsIlSuwB8lfc8EE0ZQQ6od qFspDdebCWkkjuiTz3qYjdsf/8tvYYC579XivWexKZF58FzQDAF05fsF6GCGiuVC I3KRMOe/DDuIUwd9OxTW76R6HymTjhnzJrY/+YRLQLkBHmi6DTmk83AuhcZVvCSA 6X6Ymqir9zOQ7GuDsuCMmblpQREsagak/Lv8SMWDGGot9ST+F3zXBI+HEbpZ20DT 7Dck1VakauoBUKfFKB2ICxDWE3ieAigVBx7MEHzF/OJtEnPRgceajZByFEJFTk7p QxvP1wPzDJTmmErRJ5kBApqq1IzYc47Ged5sa1b43ZwOaqne70u1B2BVd5dsFfHM uq7GXsw3hZ7+MWxc3iNOnyc2FEcLzyxPFp7ymBS5/8h7qj+FLCmHV9IpXTiVrWEY r2U2kVWD0+0eza/TySjC+lmV/v5dPqyNnrMJn1zerCEwkNnpcxHcH22/YuWoJPVb 7nxlqvOAEuNzvZZyMNDAajotd/C1CBTWimdLBb8IVW9h5kbLiyk= =/+5R -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --m4sqvfwinasof6ph-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue May 4 10:12:54 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88FD862C764 for ; Tue, 4 May 2021 10:12:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from se@freebsd.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [96.47.72.83]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FZFyt3K1Nz4qpf; Tue, 4 May 2021 10:12:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from se@freebsd.org) Received: from Stefans-MBP-449.fritz.box (p200300cd5f1fe90065a61f79a1f1456d.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [IPv6:2003:cd:5f1f:e900:65a6:1f79:a1f1:456d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: se/mail) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 00FA61BE7; Tue, 4 May 2021 10:12:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from se@freebsd.org) To: Mathieu Arnold Cc: FreeBSD ports References: <2c1ab5d2-d885-8f8d-94dd-99d0a5559a88@freebsd.org> <20210503070134.bydnbc2eah7st2on@aching.in.mat.cc> <6041a16c-a114-2896-7162-39b59110b782@freebsd.org> <20210504094653.3m27ucqa3hotsusw@aching.in.mat.cc> From: Stefan Esser Subject: Re: [SOLVED?] Recovery of deleted ports fails due to pre-commit checks Message-ID: Date: Tue, 4 May 2021 12:12:50 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210504094653.3m27ucqa3hotsusw@aching.in.mat.cc> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="LNlZfEGy7R9r9aPlfXcSC5QrgC9hhP24i" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 May 2021 10:12:54 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --LNlZfEGy7R9r9aPlfXcSC5QrgC9hhP24i Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="rAcf3DpOZWre8p3qcZhGXayOK3bJ9HaJn"; protected-headers="v1" From: Stefan Esser To: Mathieu Arnold Cc: FreeBSD ports Message-ID: Subject: Re: [SOLVED?] Recovery of deleted ports fails due to pre-commit checks References: <2c1ab5d2-d885-8f8d-94dd-99d0a5559a88@freebsd.org> <20210503070134.bydnbc2eah7st2on@aching.in.mat.cc> <6041a16c-a114-2896-7162-39b59110b782@freebsd.org> <20210504094653.3m27ucqa3hotsusw@aching.in.mat.cc> In-Reply-To: <20210504094653.3m27ucqa3hotsusw@aching.in.mat.cc> --rAcf3DpOZWre8p3qcZhGXayOK3bJ9HaJn Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Am 04.05.21 um 11:46 schrieb Mathieu Arnold: > On Mon, May 03, 2021 at 09:54:36PM +0200, Stefan Esser wrote: >> Am 03.05.21 um 09:01 schrieb Mathieu Arnold: >>> On Sat, May 01, 2021 at 09:01:02PM +0200, Stefan Esser wrote: >>>> The recovery of deleted ports in their previous form is rejected >>>> by the pre-commit checks on the repository server: >>>> >>>> remote: >>>> remote: =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D >>>> remote: Do not commit ports without TIMESTAMP in their distinfo file= s. >>>> remote: Rerun make makesum to add it. >>>> remote: =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D >>>> remote: >>>> >>>> I have tried to revert the deletion with unchanged files and then >>>> updated the ports' Makefiles and distinfo files in a later commit. >>>> >>>> Pushing those commits all together fails with the message above, >>>> and in order to not confuse GIT, deleted files should be committed >>>> first, before applying any changes. >>> >>> This is not needed at all, Git cannot get confused by something it ha= s >>> no knowledge of. Once a file is deleted, or moved, the history tracki= ng >>> stops. >> >> I wanted to re-connect the resurrected files to the history of the por= t. >> And that works best, if unmodified files are committed first, changes >> applied and committed thereafter. >> >> Did you try "git log multimedia/transcode"? >> >> The history is there, back to 2002. >=20 > Yeah, but this has nothing to do with you commiting unmodified files. > Git does not track file renames or moves (or resurrection), it blindly > looks at what you told it and goes as far as it can find things. Yes, sure, but the general advice when moving around files in GIT repositories is: First move and commit unchanged, then modify in place and commit again. And I was under the impression that the same advice applies to files that have been deleted and are brought back - GIT can identify and reconnect them in a way that preserves history only by guessing, and I wanted to make it as easy as possible for GIT, since I have watched GIT to get trivial operations of that kind wrong in grotesque ways ... https://github.blog/2020-12-17-commits-are-snapshots-not-diffs/#since-com= mits-arent-diffs-how-does-git-track-renames --rAcf3DpOZWre8p3qcZhGXayOK3bJ9HaJn-- --LNlZfEGy7R9r9aPlfXcSC5QrgC9hhP24i Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="OpenPGP_signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="OpenPGP_signature" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- wsB5BAABCAAjFiEEo3HqZZwL7MgrcVMTR+u171r99UQFAmCRHiIFAwAAAAAACgkQR+u171r99UQi 4QgAgTz+WYEdgus3ouCDdjNBtCr5AiERT3zMWpA5bjAX1eSmMD3HU6/IvQ6/IIZgnnsijC+td5+G l3HNoOz3PqQhB/ljBVSw7914cNUmIJI74E/Bu6BjnWPhnVrgTGV9Xt2Vyz+V85uThkErkZ2agYkK SHriMazTvc5JC48lPhhSYGSgYeItGJYHgxHzqVBJKxf3jLK+JVuhb5eczoJRF8NAUW8/iKzdJzyx aL+9EGsF3nT3xI21TOp2Gqq5V/4j0pPfO40DXO7yNI1iWhI6VABKabLR9dZ5R1jhE5fufql/fQ1S SGfPW9DaHMzSNBg2drzbWiVe2e2zmzHp2xNIE9fGVw== =nyML -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --LNlZfEGy7R9r9aPlfXcSC5QrgC9hhP24i-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue May 4 11:23:53 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70E6C62E764 for ; Tue, 4 May 2021 11:23:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FZHXn2kjvz4v6h for ; Tue, 4 May 2021 11:23:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 5DB7E62DEFE; Tue, 4 May 2021 11:23:53 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C6F462E4BC for ; Tue, 4 May 2021 11:23:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FZHXn1k6xz4v4Q for ; Tue, 4 May 2021 11:23:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (portscout.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 24D6F107F2 for ; Tue, 4 May 2021 11:23:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.nyi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.10]) by portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 144BNrdC096465 for ; Tue, 4 May 2021 11:23:53 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 144BNrWV096462; Tue, 4 May 2021 11:23:53 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <202105041123.144BNrWV096462@portscout.nyi.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.nyi.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 4 May 2021 11:23:53 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 May 2021 11:23:53 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ multimedia/shotcut | 21.03.21 | v21.05.01 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Reported by: portscout! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue May 4 12:08:28 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 579A16301B5 for ; Tue, 4 May 2021 12:08:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mat@freebsd.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::24b:4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FZJXD1yDpz3Ckl; Tue, 4 May 2021 12:08:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mat@freebsd.org) Received: from mail.j.mat.cc (owncloud.cube.mat.cc [IPv6:2a01:678:4:1::228]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.mat.cc", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) (Authenticated sender: mat/mail) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id ECA9427BB; Tue, 4 May 2021 12:08:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mat@freebsd.org) Received: from aching.in.mat.cc (unknown [IPv6:2a01:678:ab:0:3356:ef6b:256f:d0c6]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mat@mat.cc) by mail.j.mat.cc (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A682D942D80; Tue, 4 May 2021 12:08:23 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 4 May 2021 14:08:22 +0200 From: Mathieu Arnold To: Stefan Esser Cc: FreeBSD ports Subject: Re: [SOLVED?] Recovery of deleted ports fails due to pre-commit checks Message-ID: <20210504120822.2smsk7nllmcgmmwe@aching.in.mat.cc> References: <2c1ab5d2-d885-8f8d-94dd-99d0a5559a88@freebsd.org> <20210503070134.bydnbc2eah7st2on@aching.in.mat.cc> <6041a16c-a114-2896-7162-39b59110b782@freebsd.org> <20210504094653.3m27ucqa3hotsusw@aching.in.mat.cc> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="pyrz4mnf5hpxs3qq" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 May 2021 12:08:28 -0000 --pyrz4mnf5hpxs3qq Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, May 04, 2021 at 12:12:50PM +0200, Stefan Esser wrote: > Am 04.05.21 um 11:46 schrieb Mathieu Arnold: > > On Mon, May 03, 2021 at 09:54:36PM +0200, Stefan Esser wrote: > >> Am 03.05.21 um 09:01 schrieb Mathieu Arnold: > >>> On Sat, May 01, 2021 at 09:01:02PM +0200, Stefan Esser wrote: > >>>> The recovery of deleted ports in their previous form is rejected > >>>> by the pre-commit checks on the repository server: > >>>> > >>>> remote: > >>>> remote: =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > >>>> remote: Do not commit ports without TIMESTAMP in their distinfo file= s. > >>>> remote: Rerun make makesum to add it. > >>>> remote: =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > >>>> remote: > >>>> > >>>> I have tried to revert the deletion with unchanged files and then > >>>> updated the ports' Makefiles and distinfo files in a later commit. > >>>> > >>>> Pushing those commits all together fails with the message above, > >>>> and in order to not confuse GIT, deleted files should be committed > >>>> first, before applying any changes. > >>> > >>> This is not needed at all, Git cannot get confused by something it has > >>> no knowledge of. Once a file is deleted, or moved, the history tracki= ng > >>> stops. > >> > >> I wanted to re-connect the resurrected files to the history of the por= t. > >> And that works best, if unmodified files are committed first, changes > >> applied and committed thereafter. > >> > >> Did you try "git log multimedia/transcode"? > >> > >> The history is there, back to 2002. > >=20 > > Yeah, but this has nothing to do with you commiting unmodified files. > > Git does not track file renames or moves (or resurrection), it blindly > > looks at what you told it and goes as far as it can find things. >=20 > Yes, sure, but the general advice when moving around files in GIT > repositories is: First move and commit unchanged, then modify in > place and commit again. And I was under the impression that the > same advice applies to files that have been deleted and are brought > back - GIT can identify and reconnect them in a way that preserves > history only by guessing, and I wanted to make it as easy as possible > for GIT, since I have watched GIT to get trivial operations of that > kind wrong in grotesque ways ... >=20 > https://github.blog/2020-12-17-commits-are-snapshots-not-diffs/#since-com= mits-arent-diffs-how-does-git-track-renames Note that there are two caveats. Git will only look for files to compare to in the parent of the commit where the files are added, so if it is a resurrection, Git will never find out where the file came from. Git will only look around for a few files, like a few thousands, see diff.renameLimit in git-config(1), as we have something like 140k files in the tree, there is no chance for Git to actually find the original file you moved the new file from. So, let me say it once again, if you want to record where a file was moved/resurrected from, describe it in the commit message. Don't try to be clever with special commits, Git won't care and won't find where the file came from. --=20 Mathieu Arnold --pyrz4mnf5hpxs3qq Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQKTBAABCgB9FiEEVhwchfRfuV0unqO5KesJApEdfgIFAmCROTFfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDU2 MUMxQzg1RjQ1RkI5NUQyRTlFQTNCOTI5RUIwOTAyOTExRDdFMDIACgkQKesJApEd fgKwqw/+MkrpDVl3ypCaewdi634wOy70cYOPT0koebKEO+0kAcBSr1jHC/mjQLA8 d1993cenbRw8a95t9+7eJIhoJTlu71qKlyOmmWkpyZd58Sr6I9sGQ4hnbvtZ89RR Ej2r63vJCqzIttR8+os0+VOpq6vjgBh4VuOrtLsjP2BE39EQulNIN2jYWXDp4eke qQ7hP4jejgQ/s2fXXjdregmd25JuPYswQuWhCpU9ixJJt78k8uynsCKQ+3zD575R ifNSfh/iOjxjS4hXE6xfcvKFeIOYtV64X1RfSABkbtZt8oj2ENE70qsMfEYsoyBk UAalPsrFXUg0IiQfMu4nNHSDGNlEFzpUYaniLP8yxr89WKqRUObz24PB+SsNCF7K afWIWtt/+LyyBmwuHSt5e3tNac0yO3q+De3+NZ+PVikpfljnWJRFizFkVTiG3zmb js4m/HElMBA6BdwfoGg26GWk0US8BzqAA6DQM6A4hfAl9QFiVfaSTKmOQrpzFfSp hIiDbRH/PqBWrqexYZsdQ4jTj/NpwShYvPjBouTUKv1APaB82Fe0VKYnMJicbtUx rxT+o94ES6K5GNaITmIUY8SlwU8CsODG9mjktisPHCTgXAjyzHj/eDkc+Kf+Tiso cQE9UYrNSFonl1ghsThrHXSn1QvaPaJMlzPr89OO08PhJ02oDqg= =+4BR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --pyrz4mnf5hpxs3qq-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue May 4 12:31:12 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68D60630B54 for ; Tue, 4 May 2021 12:31:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rhurlin@gwdg.de) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FZK2S0K4Bz3F4b for ; Tue, 4 May 2021 12:31:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rhurlin@gwdg.de) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 0ADF2630B53; Tue, 4 May 2021 12:31:12 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AA71630BBB for ; Tue, 4 May 2021 12:31:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rhurlin@gwdg.de) Received: from zmailer.gwdg.de (zmailer.gwdg.de [134.76.11.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FZK2L4bgcz3Djf for ; Tue, 4 May 2021 12:31:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rhurlin@gwdg.de) Received: from excmbx-03.um.gwdg.de ([134.76.9.218] helo=email.gwdg.de) by mailer.gwdg.de with esmtp (GWDG Mailer) (envelope-from ) id 1lduCZ-0000le-FY; Tue, 04 May 2021 14:30:59 +0200 Received: from krabat.raven.hur (10.250.9.199) by EXCMBX-03.um.gwdg.de (134.76.9.218) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2242.4; Tue, 4 May 2021 14:30:59 +0200 Subject: Re: gdal To: LuMiWa References: <20210502135545.3a487b8b@dismail.de> CC: FreeBSD Ports Reply-To: From: Rainer Hurling Message-ID: <3d423a8b-0bcf-de13-996a-13f36ee39eae@gwdg.de> Date: Tue, 4 May 2021 14:30:58 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210502135545.3a487b8b@dismail.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.250.9.199] X-ClientProxiedBy: excmbx-21.um.gwdg.de (134.76.9.231) To EXCMBX-03.um.gwdg.de (134.76.9.218) X-Virus-Scanned: (clean) by clamav X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FZK2L4bgcz3Djf X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of rhurlin@gwdg.de designates 134.76.11.27 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=rhurlin@gwdg.de X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.31 / 15.00]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[rhurlin@FreeBSD.org]; HAS_XOIP(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:134.76.10.0/23]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[134.76.11.27:from]; ASN(0.00)[asn:680, ipnet:134.76.0.0/16, country:DE]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; FREEFALL_USER(0.00)[rhurlin]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.99)[0.990]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; REPLYTO_DOM_NEQ_FROM_DOM(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[gwdg.de]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[134.76.11.27:from:127.0.2.255]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; BLOCKLISTDE_FAIL(0.00)[134.76.11.27:query timed out,134.76.9.218:query timed out]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[ports] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 May 2021 12:31:12 -0000 Am 02.05.21 um 19:55 schrieb LuMiWa via freebsd-ports: > Hi! > > I have a problem to build graphics/gdal on FreeBSD-13.0-RELEASE: > m::seekp' declared here: type mismatch at 1st parameter ('uint64_t' > (aka 'unsigned long') vs 'GInt64' (aka 'long long')) virtual void > seekp (uint64_t pos) = 0; ^ > exrdataset.cpp:495:1: error: unknown type name 'Int64'; did you mean > 'GInt64'? Int64 GDALEXRIOStream::tellg () > ^~~~~ > GInt64 > /usr/ports/graphics/gdal/work/gdal-3.2.2/port/cpl_port.h:267:26: note: > 'GInt64' declared here typedef GIntBig GInt64; > ^ > exrdataset.cpp:497:24: error: unknown type name 'Int64'; did you mean > 'GInt64'? return static_cast(VSIFTellL(m_fp)); > ^~~~~ > GInt64 > /usr/ports/graphics/gdal/work/gdal-3.2.2/port/cpl_port.h:267:26: note: > 'GInt64' declared here typedef GIntBig GInt64; > ^ > exrdataset.cpp:500:30: error: unknown type name 'Int64'; did you mean > 'GInt64'? void GDALEXRIOStream::seekg (Int64 pos) > ^~~~~ > GInt64 > /usr/ports/graphics/gdal/work/gdal-3.2.2/port/cpl_port.h:267:26: note: > 'GInt64' declared here typedef GIntBig GInt64; > ^ > exrdataset.cpp:566:36: error: allocating an object of abstract class > type 'GDALEXRIOStream' poDS->m_pIStream.reset(new GDALEXRIOStream(fp, > osFilename)); ^ > exrdataset.cpp:992:25: error: variable type 'GDALEXRIOStream' is an > abstract class GDALEXRIOStream ostream(fp, pszFilename); > ^ > exrdataset.cpp:1984:32: error: allocating an object of abstract class > type 'GDALEXRIOStream' poDS->m_pOStream.reset(new GDALEXRIOStream(fp, > pszFilename)); ^ > 3 warnings and 14 errors generated. > gmake[4]: *** [../../GDALmake.opt:646: ../o/exrdataset.o] Error 1 > gmake[4]: Leaving directory > '/usr/ports/graphics/gdal/work/gdal-3.2.2/frmts/exr' gmake[3]: *** > [GNUmakefile:15: exr-install-obj] Error 2 gmake[3]: Leaving directory > '/usr/ports/graphics/gdal/work/gdal-3.2.2/frmts' gmake[2]: *** > [GNUmakefile:114: frmts-target] Error 2 gmake[2]: Leaving directory > '/usr/ports/graphics/gdal/work/gdal-3.2.2' *** Error code 1 > > Stop. > make[1]: stopped in /usr/ports/graphics/gdal > *** Error code 1 > > Thank you. > > I just opened a PR with a patch, which should solve the issue ;) https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=255592 HTH, Rainer From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue May 4 14:10:41 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8D686332B5 for ; Tue, 4 May 2021 14:10:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kremels@kreme.com) Received: from mail.covisp.net (mail.covisp.net [65.121.55.42]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FZMFF0ClPz3KGb for ; Tue, 4 May 2021 14:10:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kremels@kreme.com) From: "@lbutlr" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Ports recompile for 13.0-RELEASE Message-Id: Date: Tue, 4 May 2021 08:10:38 -0600 To: FreeBSD X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.80.0.2.43) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FZMFF0ClPz3KGb X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of kremels@kreme.com designates 65.121.55.42 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=kremels@kreme.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.07 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[65.121.55.42:from]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; MISSING_MIME_VERSION(2.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[kreme.com]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[65.121.55.42:from:127.0.2.255]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.47)[0.474]; RCVD_COUNT_ZERO(0.00)[0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:209, ipnet:65.112.0.0/12, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-ports]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[65.121.55.42:from] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 May 2021 14:10:41 -0000 With the move to FreeBSD 13.0 is there a simple (single step) way to = reinstall all the current ports other than saving off a list of the = ports and then stepping through that list to reinstall them? It was very = inefficient when moving to 12.0 as many ports in the list, of course, = were dependent on other ports, but then got recompiled, sometimes = multiple times. I know I ended up in a make loop where came was compiled = over and over again until I aborted, listed the current ports, differ on = the previous ports, and picked a port I though would have a lot of reps = to restart the compile. I then did this several more times to get back = to where I had been on 11.x And there's still no way to tell if a port was installed from pkg or = from ports, correct? Since I use MariaDB instead of MySQLI have to be = sure I don't try to use package for anything that will try to install = MySQL instead. And finally, the release of 13.0 ends the 12.x versions, right? There = will not be a 12.3. (And yes, I've tried moving to poudrerie several times and we do not get = on. At all.) --=20 I don't need no stinking taglines. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue May 4 14:30:05 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69226633B65 for ; Tue, 4 May 2021 14:30:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from slim.berklix.org (slim.berklix.org [94.185.90.68]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "slim.berklix.org", Issuer "slim.berklix.org" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FZMgc2S3pz3LNF for ; Tue, 4 May 2021 14:30:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from mart.js.berklix.net (p4fc4c0dd.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [79.196.192.221]) (authenticated bits=128) by slim.berklix.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id 144ETvJt075739 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 4 May 2021 16:30:02 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (fire.js.berklix.net [192.168.91.41]) by mart.js.berklix.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id 144ETvNW044947 for ; Tue, 4 May 2021 16:29:57 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fire.js.berklix.net (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 144ETlTq098537 for ; Tue, 4 May 2021 16:29:57 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Message-Id: <202105041429.144ETlTq098537@fire.js.berklix.net> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: /usr/ports/print/ghostscript9-agpl-base gs_ll3.ps: Error: /undefinedresource (fwd) From: "Julian H. Stacey" Organization: http://berklix.com/jhs/ User-agent: EXMH on FreeBSD http://www.berklix.eu/free/ X-From: http://www.berklix.eu/~jhs/ Date: Tue, 04 May 2021 16:29:47 +0200 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FZMgc2S3pz3LNF X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of jhs@berklix.com has no SPF policy when checking 94.185.90.68) smtp.mailfrom=jhs@berklix.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.10 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FREEFALL_USER(0.00)[jhs]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[94.185.90.68:from]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; HAS_ORG_HEADER(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[berklix.com]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[94.185.90.68:from:127.0.2.255]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-0.998]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:33824, ipnet:94.185.88.0/22, country:DE]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-ports] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 May 2021 14:30:05 -0000 Hi ports@ people, I wrote this to doceng@FreeBSD.org Sun, 02 May 2021 23:43:44 +0200 but no reply by Tue May 4 16:26:48 CEST 2021. Have others seen similar or got ideas to fix gs ghostscript ? ----------- Hi doceng@FreeBSD.org as MAINTAINER= in /usr/ports/print/ghostscript9-agpl-base I'm stuck, gs fails to start, suggestions please ? FreeBSD lapr.js.berklix.net 12.2-STABLE FreeBSD 12.2-STABLE #1038: Mon Feb 15 02:04:28 CET 2021 jhs@lapr.no.berklix.net:/data/release/s2/usr/src/sys/amd64/compile/LAPR.small amd64 % printenv PATH=/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/games:/usr/local/bin TERM=xterm DESTDIR=/ TERMPATH=/etc/termcap:/usr/share/misc/termcap NOCLEANDEPENDS= % printenv PATH=/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/games:/usr/local/bin TERM=xterm DESTDIR=/ TERMPATH=/etc/termcap:/usr/share/misc/termcap NOCLEANDEPENDS= % which gs /usr/local/bin/gs % ls -l /usr/local/bin/gs - -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 7648 Apr 29 11:02 /usr/local/bin/gs* gs GPL Ghostscript 9.52 (2020-03-19) Copyright (C) 2020 Artifex Software, Inc. All rights reserved. This software is supplied under the GNU AGPLv3 and comes with NO WARRANTY: see the file COPYING for details. While reading gs_ll3.ps: Error: /undefinedresource in findresource Operand stack: (gs_icc.ps\000gs_mex_e.ps\000gs_mro_e.ps\000gs_pdf_e.ps\000gs_wan_e.ps\000pdf_ops.ps\000pdf_rbld.ps\000pdf_base.ps\000pdf_draw.ps\000gs_cff.ps\000gs_mgl_e.ps\000gs_ttf.ps\000pdf_font.ps\000pdf_main.ps\000pdf_sec.ps\000gs_epsf.ps\000gs_pdfwr.ps) (gs_ll3.ps) 1 Pscript5Idiom.pkgsave IdiomSet 6 Pscript5Idiom.pkgsave Execution stack: %interp_exit --nostringval-- findresource %loop_continue findresource findresource findresource false 1 %stopped_push --nostringval-- 1902 7 5 %oparray_pop findresource findresource --dict:16/18(ro)(G)-- --dict:2/2(G)-- findresource 2 %dict_continue findresource findresource 1900 5 5 %oparray_pop findresource %errorexec_pop findresource findresource findresource findresource Dictionary stack: --dict:943/1123(G)-- --dict:0/20(G)-- --dict:77/200(L)-- --dict:943/1123(G)-- --dict:38/43(G)-- --dict:16/18(ro)(G)-- Current allocation mode is global Current file position is 18941 Any ideas please ? I rebuilt my machine with make worl & generic then custom kernel & a load of downloaded pkg pkg info -a | wc -l 1348 ive since run cd /usr/ports/print/ghostscript9-agpl-base make clean make reinstall gs -help ends /usr/local/share/ghostscript/9.52/Resource/Init : /usr/local/share/ghostscript/9.52/lib : /usr/local/share/ghostscript/9.52/Resource/Font : /usr/local/share/ghostscript/fonts : /usr/local/share/fonts Ghostscript is also using fontconfig to search for font files my /usr/local/share/ghostscript/9.52/Resource/ has no Init should it ? drwxr-xr-x 2 root bin 4608 May 2 22:33 ./ drwxr-xr-x 11 root bin 512 May 2 22:33 ../ - -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 3297 May 2 22:23 FAPIcidfmap - -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 3297 Jun 16 2020 FAPIcidfmap.pkgsave - -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 1158 May 2 22:23 FAPIconfig - -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 1158 Jun 16 2020 FAPIconfig.pkgsave - -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 1468 May 2 22:23 FAPIfontmap - -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 1468 Jun 16 2020 FAPIfontmap.pkgsave - -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 2857 May 2 22:23 FCOfontmap-PCLPS2 - -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 2857 Jun 16 2020 FCOfontmap-PCLPS2.pkgsave - -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 109 May 2 22:23 Fontmap - -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 12929 May 2 22:23 Fontmap.GS - -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 12929 Jun 16 2020 Fontmap.GS.pkgsave - -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 109 Jun 16 2020 Fontmap.pkgsave - -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 4183 May 2 22:23 cidfmap - -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 4183 Jun 16 2020 cidfmap.pkgsave - -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 218021 May 2 22:23 gs_agl.ps /usr/local/share/ghostscript/fonts - -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 13643 Sep 19 2020 Fontmap - -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 13643 Jul 6 2019 Fontmap.pkgsave lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 49 Sep 19 2020 GothicBBB-Medium@ -> /usr/local/share/fonts/std.ja_JP/GothicBBB-Medium lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 53 Sep 19 2020 GothicBBB-Medium.gs7@ -> /usr/local/share/fonts/std.ja_JP/GothicBBB-Medium.gs7 lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 44 Sep 19 2020 MSung-Light@ -> /usr/local/share/fonts/std.zh_CN/MSung-Light lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 45 Sep 19 2020 Ryumin-Light@ -> /usr/local/share/fonts/std.ja_JP/Ryumin-Light lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 49 Sep 19 2020 Ryumin-Light.gs7@ -> /usr/local/share/fonts/std.ja_JP/Ryumin-Light.gs7 lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 48 Sep 19 2020 STHeiti-Regular@ -> /usr/local/share/fonts/std.zh_CN/STHeiti-Regular lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 45 Sep 19 2020 STSong-Light@ -> /usr/local/share/fonts/std.zh_CN/STSong-Light - -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 42833 Sep 19 2020 a010013l.afm - -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 19572 May 2 20:23 /usr/local/share/ghostscript/9.52/Resource/Init/gs_ll3.ps MD5 (share/ghostscript/9.52/Resource/Init/gs_ll3.ps) = 9c92e1f0a9fbde8aff39ab3d49e1e35b Could this be a font problem ? I used to see fontconfig errs with firefox, but that starts without error now, as does exmh so I guess its not fontfig. BTW I chased this problem back from this failing cat thing.ps | /usr/local/bin/ps2pdf -sPAPERSIZE=a4 - thing.pdf Hope you can help please, if I should provide more info please let me know. PS pkg info -a | grep -i font > /tmp/t GentiumBasic-1102_1 Gentium Basic and Gentium Book Basic TrueType fonts cantarell-fonts-0.101_1 Cantarell, a Humanist sans-serif font family croscorefonts-1.31.0_2 Fonts created from by Google for ChromeOS to replace MS TTF crosextrafonts-caladea-20130214_4 Font created by Google for ChromeOS to replace MS Cambria crosextrafonts-carlito-20130920_4 Font created by Google for ChromeOS to replace MS Calibri dejavu-2.37_1 Bitstream Vera Fonts clone with a wider range of characters encodings-1.0.5,1 X.Org Encoding fonts font-adobe-100dpi-1.0.3_4 X.Org Adobe 100dpi font font-adobe-75dpi-1.0.3_4 X.Org Adobe 75dpi font font-adobe-utopia-100dpi-1.0.4_4 X.Org Adobe Utopia 100dpi font font-adobe-utopia-75dpi-1.0.4_4 X.Org Adobe Utopia 75dpi font font-adobe-utopia-type1-1.0.4_4 X.Org Adobe Utopia Type1 font font-alias-1.0.4 X.Org Font aliases font-arabic-misc-1.0.3_4 X.Org miscellaneous Arabic fonts font-bh-100dpi-1.0.3_4 X.Org Bigelow Holmes 100dpi font font-bh-75dpi-1.0.3_4 X.Org Bigelow Holmes 75dpi font font-bh-lucidatypewriter-100dpi-1.0.3_4 X.Org Bigelow Holmes Lucida TypeWriter 100dpi font font-bh-lucidatypewriter-75dpi-1.0.3_4 X.Org Bigelow Holmes Lucida TypeWriter 75dpi font font-bh-ttf-1.0.3_4 X.Org Bigelow & Holmes TTF font font-bh-type1-1.0.3_4 X.Org Bigelow Holmes Type1 font font-bitstream-100dpi-1.0.3_4 X.Org Bitstream Vera 100dpi font font-bitstream-75dpi-1.0.3_4 X.Org Bitstream Vera 75dpi font font-bitstream-type1-1.0.3_4 X.Org Bitstream Vera Type1 font font-cronyx-cyrillic-1.0.3_4 X.Org Cronyx Cyrillic font font-cursor-misc-1.0.3_4 X.Org miscellaneous Cursor fonts font-daewoo-misc-1.0.3_4 X.Org miscellaneous Daewoo fonts font-dec-misc-1.0.3_4 X.Org miscellaneous Dec fonts font-ibm-type1-1.0.3_4 X.Org IBM Type1 font font-isas-misc-1.0.3_4 X.Org miscellaneous ISAS fonts font-jis-misc-1.0.3_4 X.Org miscellaneous JIS fonts font-micro-misc-1.0.3_4 X.Org miscellaneous Micro fonts font-misc-cyrillic-1.0.3_4 X.Org miscellaneous Cyrillic font font-misc-ethiopic-1.0.4 X.Org miscellaneous Ethiopic font font-misc-meltho-1.0.3_4 X.Org miscellaneous Meltho font font-misc-misc-1.1.2_4 X.Org miscellaneous Misc fonts font-mutt-misc-1.0.3_4 X.Org miscellaneous Mutt fonts font-schumacher-misc-1.1.2_4 X.Org miscellaneous Schumacher fonts font-screen-cyrillic-1.0.4_4 X.Org Screen Cyrillic font font-sony-misc-1.0.3_4 X.Org miscellaneous Sony fonts font-sun-misc-1.0.3_4 X.Org miscellaneous Sun fonts font-winitzki-cyrillic-1.0.3_4 X.Org Winitzki Cyrillic font font-xfree86-type1-1.0.4_4 X.Org XFree86 Type1 font fontconfig-2.13.93,1 XML-based font configuration API for X Windows freetype2-2.10.4 Free and portable TrueType font rendering engine gsfonts-8.11_8 Standard Fonts for Ghostscript libXfont-1.5.4_2,2 X font library libXfont2-2.0.4 X font library libXft-2.3.3 Client-sided font API for X applications liberation-fonts-ttf-2.1.3,2 Liberation fonts from Red Hat to replace MS TTF fonts libfontenc-1.1.4 The fontenc Library libxaw3dxft-1.6.2.e 3D Xaw (Athena Widget Set) replacement with extended fonts linuxlibertine-g-20120116_2 Linux Libertine G and Linux Biolinum G fonts mkfontscale-1.2.1 Creates an index of scalable font files for X t1lib-5.1.2_5,1 Type 1 font rasterization library for Unix/X11 twemoji-color-font-ttf-13.0.1 Color emoji font using Twitter Unicode 10 woff2-1.0.2_4 Library and converter tools for the WOFF 2.0 web font format xfd-1.1.3 Display all characters in an X font xfontsel-1.0.6 Point and click selection of X11 font names xlsfonts-1.0.6 Server font list displayer for X xorg-fonts-7.7_1 X.org fonts meta-port xorg-fonts-100dpi-7.7 X.Org 100dpi bitmap fonts xorg-fonts-75dpi-7.7 X.Org 75dpi bitmap fonts xorg-fonts-cyrillic-7.7 X.Org Cyrillic bitmap fonts xorg-fonts-miscbitmaps-7.7 X.Org miscellaneous bitmap fonts xorg-fonts-truetype-7.7_1 X.Org TrueType fonts xorg-fonts-type1-7.7 X.Org Type1 fonts pkg info -a | grep -i ostscript cdlabelgen-4.3.0 Generate postscript for frontcards and traycards for CDs dvips2ascii-1.3 PostScript (created by dvips) to ASCII converter ghostscript9-agpl-base-9.52_15 PostScript and PDF interpreter ghostscript9-agpl-x11-9.52 PostScript and PDF interpreter, X11 support gsfonts-8.11_8 Standard Fonts for Ghostscript gv-3.7.4_5 PostScript and PDF previewer libspectre-0.2.9 Small library for rendering Postscript documents psutils-1.17_5 Utilities for manipulating PostScript documents tex-dvipsk-5.995_2 Convert a TeX DVI file to PostScript Gv thing.ps emits err: While reading gs_ll3.ps: Error: /undefinedresource in findresource Operand stack: (gs_icc.ps\000gs_mex_e.ps\000gs_mro_e.ps\000gs_pdf_e.ps\000gs_wan_e.ps\000pdf_ops.ps\000pdf_rbld.ps\000pdf_base.ps\000pdf_draw.ps\000gs_cff.ps\000gs_mgl_e.ps\000gs_ttf.ps\000pdf_font.ps\000pdf_main.ps\000pdf_sec.ps\000gs_epsf.ps\000gs_pdfwr.ps) (gs_ll3.ps) 1 Pscript5Idiom.pkgsave IdiomSet 6 Pscript5Idiom.pkgsave Execution stack: %interp_exit --nostringval-- findresource %loop_continue findresource findresource findresource false 1 %stopped_push --nostringval-- 1902 7 5 %oparray_pop findresource findresource --dict:16/18(ro)(G)-- --dict:2/2(G)-- findresource 1 %dict_continue findresource findresource 1900 5 5 %oparray_pop findresource %errorexec_pop findresource findresource findresource findresource Dictionary stack: --dict:947/1123(G)-- --dict:0/20(G)-- --dict:77/200(L)-- --dict:947/1123(G)-- --dict:38/43(G)-- --dict:16/18(ro)(G)-- Current allocation mode is global Current file position is 18941 on 9.2-rel the same gv thing.ps displays OK Cheers, -- Julian Stacey http://berklix.com/jhs/ http://stolenvotes.uk UK for Brexit stole 750K votes from Brits in EU of 3.7M globaly. Zap BoJo Mogg. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue May 4 14:50:00 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBA846349F3 for ; Tue, 4 May 2021 14:50:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@grem.de) Received: from mail.evolve.de (mail.evolve.de [213.239.217.29]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA512 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mail.evolve.de", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FZN6b3hkkz3Mdx for ; Tue, 4 May 2021 14:49:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@grem.de) Received: by mail.evolve.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 2f74a734; Tue, 4 May 2021 14:49:55 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=grem.de; h=date:from:to:cc :subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=20180501; bh=RtF0AYMf ERDLBilf6gZx3BoMve0=; b=IdYdB1wXwMn0qbQGsNr0DdYsrHuraTnGDVC+3vmM GrrBb7kEXHoo/erCMKD19DvObevEkrAzsIxyw4GRwBZxaK6rL8SE+mZaAku7RGeJ dmDBZMwbEcJbnILnpCaJFl4NTs9fnKWmqU0e+rgSuqiilbDXAU8Bh5CR5EnRgnKJ nQirOGBa1W47W4zbxboe76mNN2kcOMZkTrlwRgjlrp9ShoPEUrZY+KzlRJC6fPVy cDJeuJ0nH0m++2zA/VLv9n0+43u5jAUdgkl92s5ZV3nch8Z5dnXvqFrlVChOtxOG aU3F1p/piOlwxyAvUrDyOqm1iuA31d7DN1rRu6mK9AlYcA== DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=grem.de; h=date:from:to:cc :subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=20180501; b=Af VMO7fcsIQjCKVr3katvWKWfGNQ3edppZ5NYLlVZpsn+WQNy74Y9jcFzof2RGMwtc dClnLNSiikPKDpdHoL4GIU+cekzOrTfMwl6A7q0GOdrxSQ1APXRpb7vatWAdY/Tr G1HDUZexvgZwU8NZnnLI9anPr5nVTfFwknM1SByqRY4t4mRUsWMn0Z04NXBQBmNi trTE4zyqKPlSTi+qKtx0wHOVoJSqYxPBUollPGWG57OCe2gke2NwRINC4UGZt9Zz ZT99OxEsh2REU3E+WYTPrAHYa+ngT7pn+LyjIVmEJRyBYTd7JY/3/ybU5dZYFxbr hVlHSysPRN4h4jZe2g1g== Received: by mail.evolve.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 1aa80632 (TLSv1.3:AEAD-CHACHA20-POLY1305-SHA256:256:NO); Tue, 4 May 2021 14:49:52 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 4 May 2021 16:49:18 +0200 From: Michael Gmelin To: "@lbutlr" Cc: FreeBSD Subject: Re: Ports recompile for 13.0-RELEASE Message-ID: <20210504164918.07864f1a@bsd64.grem.de> In-Reply-To: References: X-Face: $wrgCtfdVw_H9WAY?S&9+/F"!41z'L$uo*WzT8miX?kZ~W~Lr5W7v?j0Sde\mwB&/ypo^}> +a'4xMc^^KroE~+v^&^#[B">soBo1y6(TW6#UZiC]o>C6`ej+i Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAJFBMVEWJBwe5BQDl LASZU0/LTEWEfHbyj0Txi32+sKrp1Mv944X8/fm1rS+cAAAACXBIWXMAAAsTAAAL EwEAmpwYAAAAB3RJTUUH3wESCxwC7OBhbgAAACFpVFh0Q29tbWVudAAAAAAAQ3Jl YXRlZCB3aXRoIFRoZSBHSU1QbbCXAAAAAghJREFUOMu11DFvEzEUAGCfEhBVFzuq AKkLd0O6VrIQsLXVSZXoWE5N1K3DobBBA9fQpRWc8OkWouaIjedWKiyREOKs+3PY fvalCNjgLVHeF7/3bMtBzV8C/VsQ8tecEgCcDgrzjekwKZ7TwsJZd/ywEKwwP+ZM 8P3drTsAwWn2mpWuDDuYiK1bFs6De0KUUFw0tWxm+D4AIhuuvZqtyWYeO7jQ4Aea 7jUqI+ixhQoHex4WshEvSXdood7stlv4oSuFOC4tqGcr0NjEqXgV4mMJO38nld4+ xKNxRDon7khyKVqY7YR4d+Cg0OMrkWXZOM7YDkEfKiilCn1qYv4mighZiynuHHOA Wq9QJq+BIES7lMFUtcikMnkDGHUoncA+uHgrP0ctIEqfwLHzeSo+eUA66AqzwN6n 2ZHJhw6Qh/PoyC/QENyEyC/AyNjq74Bs+3UH0xYwzDUC4B97HgLocg1QLYgDDO1v f3UX9Y307Ew4AHh67YAFFsxEpkXwpXY3eIgMhAAE3R19L919nNnuD2wlPcDE3UeT L2ytEICQib9BXgS2fU8PrD82ToYO1OEmMSnYTjSqSv9wdC0tPYC+rQRQD9ESnldF CyqfmiYW+tlALt8gH2xrMdC/youbjzPXEun+/ReXsMCDyve3dZc09fn2Oas8oXGc Jj6/fOeK5UmSMPmf/jL+GD8BEj0k/Fn6IO4AAAAASUVORK5CYII= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FZN6b3hkkz3Mdx X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=grem.de header.s=20180501 header.b=IdYdB1wX; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of freebsd@grem.de designates 213.239.217.29 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=freebsd@grem.de X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.50 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[grem.de:s=20180501]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:213.239.217.29/32]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[grem.de]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[213.239.217.29:from:127.0.2.255]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[grem.de:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[213.239.217.29:from]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:213.239.192.0/18, country:DE]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-ports] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 May 2021 14:50:00 -0000 On Tue, 4 May 2021 08:10:38 -0600 "@lbutlr" wrote: > With the move to FreeBSD 13.0 is there a simple (single step) way to > reinstall all the current ports other than saving off a list of the > ports and then stepping through that list to reinstall them? > It was very inefficient when moving to 12.0 as many ports in the > list, of course, were dependent on other ports, but then got > recompiled, sometimes multiple times. I know I ended up in a make > loop where came was compiled over and over again until I aborted, > listed the current ports, differ on the previous ports, and picked a > port I though would have a lot of reps to restart the compile. I then > did this several more times to get back to where I had been on 11.x Using a local poudriere repo fixes all of the above ;) > > And there's still no way to tell if a port was installed from pkg or > from ports, correct? Since I use MariaDB instead of MySQLI have to be > sure I don't try to use package for anything that will try to install > MySQL instead. The repository the package came from is stored in the annotation tag named "repository". You can see this, e.g., by using pkg query "%n %At %Av" or pkg info -R By default this is "FreeBSD" for the official repos. If you install locally ("make install"), it's not set. > > And finally, the release of 13.0 ends the 12.x versions, right? There > will not be a 12.3. See https://www.freebsd.org/security/#sup, there will be a 12.3. > > (And yes, I've tried moving to poudrerie several times and we do not > get on. At all.) Well, that's the recommended way of doing what you're trying to accomplish, otherwise you'll be in dependency hell like we've all been updating our machines in the 2000s. Alternatively, you could create a jail or VM manually, install all packages you need in there from ports using make install. You can retrieve the list of what you need on your target host using pkg query -e "%a = 0" %o Then run "pkg create -a" on that machine to get a set of all binary packages. Then copy those over to your target machine and install them using pkg add. Will be messy, but kind of work. I really would prefer poudriere over that though. Best Michael -- Michael Gmelin From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue May 4 15:01:07 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E86A463507F for ; Tue, 4 May 2021 15:01:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ronald-lists@klop.ws) Received: from smarthost1.greenhost.nl (smarthost1.greenhost.nl [195.190.28.88]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FZNMQ73W0z3NKC for ; Tue, 4 May 2021 15:01:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ronald-lists@klop.ws) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=klop.ws; s=mail; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version: Date:Message-ID:From:References:To:Subject:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=A9AE2JxqbZ443iX/DwgIsDGacyTYwxW8Nz1aHC/t5C8=; b=ppuRVvEDKbsfcjMEqgoznTfO5x N0bWhLHBK0MljfcKfeziaVirwBK+d4IUSMCTIIKjMnDXNTUiKPJpf635DBoFFPMnenT0/oJlHPvhC vybETfBqOyEYUZPGestjLrqkQvlYDmQFOBpnbIPBktzndQENIF0W30wukVQlrULMttM4=; Subject: Re: Ports recompile for 13.0-RELEASE To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: From: Ronald Klop Message-ID: <8093cca5-520e-436f-4a7d-8ce1bf680ca7@klop.ws> Date: Tue, 4 May 2021 17:00:43 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authenticated-As-Hash: 398f5522cb258ce43cb679602f8cfe8b62a256d1 X-Virus-Scanned: by clamav at smarthost1.greenhost.nl X-Scan-Signature: 51a43cd7ff6838d9e9bce89dbcde6c26 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FZNMQ73W0z3NKC X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=klop.ws header.s=mail header.b=ppuRVvED; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=klop.ws; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of ronald-lists@klop.ws designates 195.190.28.88 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=ronald-lists@klop.ws X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[klop.ws:s=mail]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:195.190.28.64/27]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[klop.ws:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[klop.ws,none]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[195.190.28.88:from]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; RCVD_COUNT_ZERO(0.00)[0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_VERYGOOD(0.00)[195.190.28.88:from]; ASN(0.00)[asn:47172, ipnet:195.190.28.0/24, country:NL]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-ports] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 May 2021 15:01:08 -0000 On 5/4/21 4:10 PM, @lbutlr wrote: > With the move to FreeBSD 13.0 is there a simple (single step) way to reinstall all the current ports other than saving off a list of the ports and then stepping through that list to reinstall them? It was very inefficient when moving to 12.0 as many ports in the list, of course, were dependent on other ports, but then got recompiled, sometimes multiple times. I know I ended up in a make loop where came was compiled over and over again until I aborted, listed the current ports, differ on the previous ports, and picked a port I though would have a lot of reps to restart the compile. I then did this several more times to get back to where I had been on 11.x > I used "portmaster -fa" in the past. (see ports-mgmt/portmaster) > And there's still no way to tell if a port was installed from pkg or from ports, correct? Since I use MariaDB instead of MySQLI have to be sure I don't try to use package for anything that will try to install MySQL instead. > I don't know. > And finally, the release of 13.0 ends the 12.x versions, right? There will not be a 12.3. https://www.freebsd.org/security/#sup 12.x has support until 2024. So a 12.3 is in the pipeline. 12.4 probably also. 11.4 was the latest 11.x release AFAIK. > > (And yes, I've tried moving to poudrerie several times and we do not get on. At all.) > Might help to do another attempt. Especially if you are using custom port settings instead of pkgs. Regards, Ronald. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue May 4 15:02:17 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 437B3634D68 for ; Tue, 4 May 2021 15:02:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from warlock@phouka1.phouka.net) Received: from phouka1.phouka.net (phouka1.phouka.net [107.170.196.116]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "phouka.net", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certificate Authority - G2" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FZNNT2ztNz3NTs for ; Tue, 4 May 2021 15:02:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from warlock@phouka1.phouka.net) Received: from phouka1.phouka.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by phouka1.phouka.net (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPS id 144F0Z7d072946 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 4 May 2021 08:00:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from warlock@phouka1.phouka.net) Received: (from warlock@localhost) by phouka1.phouka.net (8.16.1/8.16.1/Submit) id 144F0Y8g072945; Tue, 4 May 2021 08:00:34 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from warlock) Date: Tue, 4 May 2021 08:00:31 -0700 From: John Kennedy To: "@lbutlr" Cc: FreeBSD Subject: Re: Ports recompile for 13.0-RELEASE Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FZNNT2ztNz3NTs X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of warlock@phouka1.phouka.net has no SPF policy when checking 107.170.196.116) smtp.mailfrom=warlock@phouka1.phouka.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.79 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-ports]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.99)[-0.991]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[107.170.196.116:from]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[phouka.net]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[107.170.196.116:from:127.0.2.255]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[warlock@phouka.net,warlock@phouka1.phouka.net]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[warlock@phouka.net,warlock@phouka1.phouka.net]; ASN(0.00)[asn:14061, ipnet:107.170.192.0/18, country:US] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 May 2021 15:02:17 -0000 On Tue, May 04, 2021 at 08:10:38AM -0600, @lbutlr wrote: > With the move to FreeBSD 13.0 is there a simple (single step) way to reinstall all the current ports other than saving off a list of the ports and then stepping through that list to reinstall them? It was very inefficient when moving to 12.0 as many ports in the list, of course, were dependent on other ports, but then got recompiled, sometimes multiple times. I know I ended up in a make loop where came was compiled over and over again until I aborted, listed the current ports, differ on the previous ports, and picked a port I though would have a lot of reps to restart the compile. I then did this several more times to get back to where I had been on 11.x > > And there's still no way to tell if a port was installed from pkg or from ports, correct? Since I use MariaDB instead of MySQLI have to be sure I don't try to use package for anything that will try to install MySQL instead. > > And finally, the release of 13.0 ends the 12.x versions, right? There will not be a 12.3. > > (And yes, I've tried moving to poudrerie several times and we do not get on. At all.) If you can get everything into a pkg repo, "pkg upgrade -f" should reinstall everything regardless of if pkg thinks it needs to. I suspect that your problem is minimum proper rebuilding rather than reinstallation. I just keep a list of packages I want (vs all build dependencies), which made my what-needs-rebuilding list much smaller (the dependency list is huge, but I didn't need to track that). I have a list of 58 packages I want installed, but have 494 packages installed for dependencies and I think the build total (some build dependencies don't get installed) is 600+. Your story is reminding me about my portmaster problems back in the day (that drove me to try poudriere, not get it, try synth, then run on synth until I ran into other issues (arm64) that remotivated me to learn poudriere). I know there is someone that has tried to fix portmaster in the meantime, but I think the basic issue is that there are, and will continue to be, issues with incompatible build dependencies that are "solved" by clean-room build systems which are probably the cause of some of those make loops. The last time I had this conversation, someone who had been beating on portmaster spoke up about the work they'd been doing to try and get the clean-room work added to it, but I don't know about the status of that. I think you're going to be aggravated until you find a ports management fix that works for you. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue May 4 15:17:29 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DE536357BE for ; Tue, 4 May 2021 15:17:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yasu@utahime.org) Received: from maybe.home.utahime.org (gate.home.utahime.org [183.180.29.210]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FZNkJ1Btfz3P5R for ; Tue, 4 May 2021 15:17:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yasu@utahime.org) Received: from eastasia.home.utahime.org (eastasia.home.utahime.org [192.168.174.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-384) server-digest SHA384) (No client certificate requested) by maybe.home.utahime.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B559EA028 for ; Wed, 5 May 2021 00:17:17 +0900 (JST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=utahime.org; s=maybe2019112701; t=1620141437; bh=I1WlQpxVO4pH+0RBLso22d9dRLf5Ya6RIOTx33V0l/w=; h=Date:To:Subject:From:In-Reply-To:References; b=LG+a+ah7XUUgT9yVlANFlY5BhRojV8i1JAaJLa2Vo3FlswRyOitZVvnVzyVi4avcA ZrkynHDv5ZyuQVsgw5Z0eiM9VmivpwO3H+hI4eX8iwyvJxJNLDYbTE8U8NvOuP7gxz vXZRVOiAYH9CRRKRIFaboXOjbBmmgYFVxKdxoLe8ihW9AFjEMvnFG1YjL4Tser+1ks Lcphx9jBKzlzmPz0dxYSjeg+jrTdmFJ8BrNyv960WdYSsrd/oOifwrxDu/knOK2U8Z 5Omtsfc8tIQ4mUmd7O4u1qTkU05iNDfXU8ZcSeIigkAPrhufCesVyUeyn9LC7OZnBN wf7aRDIfu8I5Q== Received: from localhost (rolling.home.utahime.org [192.168.174.11]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-384)) (No client certificate requested) by eastasia.home.utahime.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6155F243BA; Wed, 5 May 2021 00:17:16 +0900 (JST) X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.103.2 at eastasia.home.utahime.org Date: Wed, 05 May 2021 00:15:39 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20210505.001539.27215720178769672.yasu@utahime.org> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Ports recompile for 13.0-RELEASE From: Yasuhiro Kimura In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Mew version 6.8 on Emacs 27.2 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FZNkJ1Btfz3P5R X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=utahime.org header.s=maybe2019112701 header.b=LG+a+ah7; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of yasu@utahime.org designates 183.180.29.210 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=yasu@utahime.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.70 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+a:spf-authorized.utahime.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; HFILTER_HELO_IP_A(1.00)[maybe.home.utahime.org]; HFILTER_HELO_NORES_A_OR_MX(0.30)[maybe.home.utahime.org]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[utahime.org:+]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-0.997]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[183.180.29.210:from]; ASN(0.00)[asn:2519, ipnet:183.180.0.0/16, country:JP]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[utahime.org:s=maybe2019112701]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[utahime.org]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[183.180.29.210:from:127.0.2.255]; MID_CONTAINS_FROM(1.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-ports] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 May 2021 15:17:29 -0000 From: "@lbutlr" Subject: Ports recompile for 13.0-RELEASE Date: Tue, 4 May 2021 08:10:38 -0600 > With the move to FreeBSD 13.0 is there a simple (single step) way to > reinstall all the current ports other than saving off a list of the > ports and then stepping through that list to reinstall them? It depends on how there are installed. If they are installed by using official pakcages or building personal packages with poudriere, then `pkg upgrade` is worth trying. But you should save list of installed packages just in case. otherwise (i.e. you used portmaster or simple `cd /usr/port/category/portname; make insall`) `portmaster -af` may work fine if you are lucky. But in this case I think saving list of installed packages, removing all of them and then reinstalling them is probably the easiest and shortest way as a result. > And finally, the release of 13.0 ends the 12.x versions, right? > There will not be a 12.3. According to 'Supported FreeBSD releases' (https://www.freebsd.org/security/#sup), expected EoL of 12.2-RELEASE is '12.3-RELEASE + 3 months', and that of stable/12 is June 30, 2024. So at least 12.3-RELEASE will be released. And probably 12.4-RELEASE will be too. --- Yasuhiro Kimura From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue May 4 15:19:58 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 918A163586B for ; Tue, 4 May 2021 15:19:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yasu@utahime.org) Received: from maybe.home.utahime.org (gate.home.utahime.org [183.180.29.210]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FZNn95WJZz3PTx for ; Tue, 4 May 2021 15:19:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yasu@utahime.org) Received: from eastasia.home.utahime.org (eastasia.home.utahime.org [192.168.174.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-384) server-digest SHA384) (No client certificate requested) by maybe.home.utahime.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 70394A064 for ; Wed, 5 May 2021 00:19:54 +0900 (JST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=utahime.org; s=maybe2019112701; t=1620141594; bh=kVg91dznDkVN4/k1Wo3vWkhNrTgRh9P592a18asNHH8=; h=Date:To:Subject:From:In-Reply-To:References; b=wygwfHf9xr+kJja1yQwLGLgOTS6Nl9RryofHKRU9en/bYsLto6J/pLajTKLBHM4vH fwuK6T+Lhx0KXFujVZREf/evW3+mOyfopGplkJdtlwwBH6Q0sQmS8Cju8vZ465jl0t i8IjBLCNF97TQQV1mHhRwAG2aHWZFbWfjI8qzkLtUlCko/aeF/1OqOsZO6relmqjWO 7sfn3niBpLMNRnR+YWeXXY1YYUImz0Un+XAMhsUiAqKPqqXloMwMia6SVbEfwE8s7e +oOu/q95unxGmziE4gxI6KwA19u3niqs5xJAiOyrOZXMtLk+NP8DYFYoHNtQQIZUYv 8/KMsuoF+6DNQ== Received: from localhost (rolling.home.utahime.org [192.168.174.11]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-384) server-digest SHA384) (No client certificate requested) by eastasia.home.utahime.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9404C24421; Wed, 5 May 2021 00:19:52 +0900 (JST) X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.103.2 at eastasia.home.utahime.org Date: Wed, 05 May 2021 00:19:45 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20210505.001945.842502126861009990.yasu@utahime.org> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Ports recompile for 13.0-RELEASE From: Yasuhiro Kimura In-Reply-To: <20210505.001539.27215720178769672.yasu@utahime.org> References: <20210505.001539.27215720178769672.yasu@utahime.org> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.8 on Emacs 27.2 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FZNn95WJZz3PTx X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=utahime.org header.s=maybe2019112701 header.b=wygwfHf9; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of yasu@utahime.org designates 183.180.29.210 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=yasu@utahime.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.69 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+a:spf-authorized.utahime.org:c]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; HFILTER_HELO_NORES_A_OR_MX(0.30)[maybe.home.utahime.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; HFILTER_HELO_IP_A(1.00)[maybe.home.utahime.org]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[utahime.org:+]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.99)[-0.988]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[183.180.29.210:from]; ASN(0.00)[asn:2519, ipnet:183.180.0.0/16, country:JP]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[utahime.org:s=maybe2019112701]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[utahime.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[183.180.29.210:from:127.0.2.255]; MID_CONTAINS_FROM(1.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-ports] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 May 2021 15:19:58 -0000 From: Yasuhiro Kimura Subject: Re: Ports recompile for 13.0-RELEASE Date: Wed, 05 May 2021 00:15:39 +0900 (JST) > It depends on how there are installed. If they are installed by using > official pakcages or building personal packages with poudriere, then > `pkg upgrade` is worth trying. Oops, it should be `pkg upgrade -f`. --- Yasuhiro Kimura From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue May 4 15:33:15 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77E0D635E8A for ; Tue, 4 May 2021 15:33:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FZP4W2ch3z3Q0b for ; Tue, 4 May 2021 15:33:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 59D9E635E89; Tue, 4 May 2021 15:33:15 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 599FB636020 for ; Tue, 4 May 2021 15:33:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp.rcn.com (smtp.rcn.com [69.168.97.78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FZP4V1VLTz3PvV for ; Tue, 4 May 2021 15:33:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; d=rcn.com; s=20180516; c=relaxed/simple; q=dns/txt; i=@rcn.com; t=1620142392; h=From:Subject:Date:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; bh=Oi7VF/aNHq/RYk1cU6cIdJFUnwA=; b=jvNvQm6Mw12Hszdm/pIZ/5IenKNRfTkcneQs6dN/HrCJhijuo3cLEzHarstMaH4u +9SldOOiE9ADNPCbGB/S7Ts1BMlWQLO3gjos9YWHsyReoNJWhlJZyLMUawNZH8X4 lPjVDO8OO5BF0sG+XP3oPRo8i7+tbElosqQWXczMc3x0shygMtPY1soXSaB3KQC4 6gqkHfjAHrfeXsPHp3/4rtAfq5FeDdog++i8wRc2onVlFMf/H4RMERWMyPU0eUYk pEc8cm14v7vEobUG5DanP8GBrWcdlSq364etkFyDKgA+mrpgKSaXUyaz5U8SvZZG +CD3fJt7lRk/xEWofNG8Tg==; X-Authed-Username: cm9iZXJ0aHVmZkByY24uY29t Received: from [209.6.230.48] ([209.6.230.48:27685] helo=jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) by smtp.rcn.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 3.6.25.56547 r(Core:3.6.25.0)) with ESMTPSA (cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384) id E3/82-55428-83961906; Tue, 04 May 2021 11:33:12 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <24721.26936.103525.451533@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Tue, 4 May 2021 11:33:12 -0400 From: Robert Huff To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: looking for port origin for executable X-Mailer: VM 8.2.0b under 27.2 (amd64-portbld-freebsd14.0) X-Vade-Verdict: clean X-Vade-Analysis: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrvdefiedgleduucetufdoteggodetrfdotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuufgjpfetvefqtfdptfevpfdpqfgfvfenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedtudenucenucfjughrpeggtgfgkfffhffvuffosehtjeertdertddvnecuhfhrohhmpeftohgsvghrthcujfhufhhfuceorhhosggvrhhthhhufhhfsehrtghnrdgtohhmqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpedufedugeetieeludefhfeitdffteekgeejhfekueekgeevffekledvjedvleegfeenucfkphepvddtledriedrvdeftddrgeeknecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehinhgvthepvddtledriedrvdeftddrgeekpdhhvghlohepjhgvrhhushgrlhgvmhdrlhhithhtvghrrghtuhhsrdhorhhgrdhlihhtthgvrhgrthhushdrohhrghdpmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehrohgsvghrthhhuhhffhesrhgtnhdrtghomhdprhgtphhtthhopehpohhrthhssehfrhgvvggsshgurdhorhhgpdhhohhsthepshhmthhprdhrtghnrdgtmhhhrdhshihnrggtohhrrdgtohhmpdhsphhfpehsohhfthhfrghilhdpughkihhmpe X-Vade-Client: RCN X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FZP4V1VLTz3PvV X-Spamd-Bar: ----- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=rcn.com header.s=20180516 header.b=jvNvQm6M; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=rcn.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of roberthuff@rcn.com designates 69.168.97.78 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=roberthuff@rcn.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-5.10 / 15.00]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[rcn.com:s=20180516]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:69.168.97.0/24]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; DWL_DNSWL_LOW(-1.00)[rcn.com:dkim]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[69.168.97.78:from]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[69.168.97.78:from:127.0.2.255]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[rcn.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[rcn.com,none]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[69.168.97.78:from]; ASN(0.00)[asn:36271, ipnet:69.168.97.0/24, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[ports]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[69.168.97.78:from] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 May 2021 15:33:15 -0000 Hello: Would some kind soul please tell me which port installs the executable "g-ir-scanner"? I was purging unused ports and seem to have done this one by mistake. Apologetically, Robert Huff From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue May 4 15:40:57 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 415116361B3 for ; Tue, 4 May 2021 15:40:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from herbert@gojira.at) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FZPFP0YR8z3QPj for ; Tue, 4 May 2021 15:40:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from herbert@gojira.at) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 1127663616F; Tue, 4 May 2021 15:40:57 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10E85636480 for ; Tue, 4 May 2021 15:40:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from herbert@gojira.at) Received: from mail.bsd4all.net (mail.bsd4all.net [94.130.200.20]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mail.bsd4all.net", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FZPFN02tyz3QPg for ; Tue, 4 May 2021 15:40:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from herbert@gojira.at) Date: Tue, 4 May 2021 17:40:53 +0200 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=gojira.at; s=mail202005; t=1620142853; bh=BE6RIaCmnB/OEPPRrJhD3oULt/2uvYiGmKkLL434fdE=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=vmB8nFBVxh6iHbOTKm3wje8cEFLvZklaRJ6UUFdpKPN+2i5XokFiWuy9Mn1vrCYAT qFLvQnfHF/Fo6D7ucqKVYfonE7K5+occnkW4kBPG+h4r+SxMURElN850SzXZhtClOa qfhfsmw+eSYcrAYdqopCC+LOux6Uz/zsDe5nZQBgYz4brRLf+GNBXNOBUZv96Bphsi hHc5sOFmPRQy1WcQ8iEKulscejxPkWvYTf9f12Ww9k1XsPNaetRfuoZcbxF3ZcmH2o GUHfANFncm09gW55mkLp66dxpu0Oebc2jZrMD8U1s7wOB8VMFa5dBYehgR0XUN4xOz rbUOzsbKKtQpg== From: "Herbert J. Skuhra" To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: looking for port origin for executable Message-ID: References: <24721.26936.103525.451533@jerusalem.litteratus.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <24721.26936.103525.451533@jerusalem.litteratus.org> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FZPFN02tyz3QPg X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gojira.at header.s=mail202005 header.b=vmB8nFBV; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of herbert@gojira.at designates 94.130.200.20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=herbert@gojira.at X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.50 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gojira.at:s=mail202005]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:94.130.200.20:c]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[gojira.at]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[94.130.200.20:from:127.0.2.255]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gojira.at:+]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; RCVD_COUNT_ZERO(0.00)[0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[94.130.200.20:from]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:94.130.0.0/16, country:DE]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[ports] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 May 2021 15:40:57 -0000 On Tue, May 04, 2021 at 11:33:12AM -0400, Robert Huff wrote: > > Hello: > Would some kind soul please tell me which port installs the > executable "g-ir-scanner"? I was purging unused ports and seem to > have done this one by mistake. devel/gobject-introspection -- Herbert From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue May 4 15:51:11 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49054636752 for ; Tue, 4 May 2021 15:51:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tijl@freebsd.org) Received: from mailrelay101.isp.belgacom.be (mailrelay101.isp.belgacom.be [195.238.20.128]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "relay.skynet.be", Issuer "GlobalSign RSA OV SSL CA 2018" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FZPTB4q92z3R2t for ; Tue, 4 May 2021 15:51:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tijl@freebsd.org) IronPort-SDR: 09KQ6MLhrMDIVRtUrfcX0QFVZPuQgj1WrX6Az/graC6Eh2YGYX4LrkQqFXwsQP0gGCIDFZwuAa 5V8hDZg7kViHpAhybWLviYtIh0GyfrJDKbVHmrb+J3j2B7IRJVTWX5zAf/+AIvcB3mKPVYUozU k8oi6WzvrIGuL6aQxFH5VTaLAIhzWgQYli98dI8BuleaEpWJIAPfEmvMaLpZgc3X98sFGLsHh/ NKCWPzPYOJlDEYpZJOZq1ZbcKIXKnKgkecpU9GDFjHjEIZajkQ4mGD2+eopzVubSPy37/+PZpd IKM= X-IPAS-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A2BiAADSbJFg/wSs8lFaGgEBAQEBAQEBAQEDAQEBARIBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBAgIBAQEBQAmBToMNFVYBao1IhlOBMmwDOAGKfoUmhGiFT4FoCwEBAQEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBAS0QBAEBgVuCdQKBfCY4EwIEAQEBAwIDAQEBAQEGAQEBAQEBBQQBgQOFF?= =?us-ascii?q?zkNgjgig2sBBScTNgkQCxguVwYTgnKDC6krgQEzgQGEYYN8gQmBOgGNX0OCC?= =?us-ascii?q?4EVgyI+gg+Bdj2FeASDBD4TAYFvFSiRSxOND50ZgkZUiXmTJTeDVIFBiUyFa?= =?us-ascii?q?IpMhg4tuniBfE0wCIMkCUcZDo4sFRWFQ4JPgQeEfz8DLwI2AgYKAQEDCYwyX?= =?us-ascii?q?QEB?= IronPort-PHdr: A9a23:/HZIrB2nbBhNsSX0smDOVwQyDhhPgJ3EezUN459isYplN5qZl7zcN UDSrc9gkEXOFd2Cra4d2qyM6P6rCTFIyK3CmUhKSIZLWR4BhJdetC0bK+nBN3fGKuX3ZTcxB sVIWQwt1Xi6NU9IBJS2PAWK8TW94jEIBxrwKxd+KPjrFY7OlcS30P2594HObwlSizexfLd/I A+ooQjft8QajohvJ6YswRbVv3VEfPhby3l1LlyJhRb84cmw/J9n8ytOvv8q6tBNX6bncakmV LJUFDspPXw7683trhnDUBCA5mAAXWUMkxpHGBbK4RfnVZrsqCT6t+592C6HPc3qSL0/RDqv4 7t3RBLulSwKMSMy/mPKhcxqlK9VrhKvqQJizYDXYo6VOvVxcb/Sc94BWWpMXNxcWzBdDo+gc YcCCfcKM+ZCr4n6olsDtQWwBwyoBOjy1DJIgXj23bYk3OQkCw7G2hcgFM8JvXTIrdX1NqMSX Pu1wqnS0zrMce5b1yrz5oTSdRAhu/6MUKt2fMHMxkYhCxnLgU+MqYz5ITyVzOINvnCH4udvU e+jlm4ppg5srzWh2sshhJTFi54axF3G6Sl0wJs5K9O2RkNnfdOpH5lduiWYOoZ5Qc4vR25mt Dskx7MGv5OwYSYEyJMixxHFavyHdZCF7Qn9W+aLIjd4gHNleb2lixa070eg1vXwWdO70FZOt CZFisLMumgR1xzT68iHTPR98l252TaU0Q3Y9+JKIVgsmKfYNpIt2KA8m5UNvUjZAyP7mlv6g LWZe0gi5+Om8f7oYq/8qZ+ZL4J0jwb+PbkwlcGnGuQ4NxQOX3Cc+eShyL3v5U35T6tOjv0xi qTZs4rVJcAapq68HQBVyIEj5wyjDzen0tQYmWMLI05CeBKAlIjmJVTOL+r+DfekmVisly1rx //eMr3gBJXCMGTDna/icLpg8UJQ1gU+wc5F655JCLwNPuj/V0DpuNzdFBA5Mgi0w+j9CNV60 4MTQX6PAq6bMKPWqlKI6PgvLPeSa4AOozbyNuIp5/n0jX82gVMdZ7Wm3YMLaHCkGfRrO0uZY WDyjdgfCmgKpRcxQPXyiF2FSz5Te22yUrky5jEhFo2pE5zMRpuwj7Cb2ye7BJJWNSh6DQXGM 2rsdoyCE9dKIBmOK8Rsg3ZMAbqhUKcr2AutsA7qjbFgK7yH1DcfsMffM9w9zOrUjhw3/DpvR 5CB0mOJZ09uk24ifBNw27pw9x8ugmyf2LR11qQLXedY4OlEB19SCA== IronPort-HdrOrdr: A9a23:pkjPKaPbzG7ZdMBcT2Hw55DYdL4zR+YMi2QD/3taDTRIb82VkN 2vlvwH1RnyzA0cQm0khMroAsa9aFvm39pQ7ZMKNbmvGDPntmyhMZ144eLZrwHIMxbVstRQ3a IIScVDIfX7B1RikILe6A63D94vzLC8gd2VrM31pk0dKD1CQadm8gt/F0K/Gkp5WAFJCfMCZe ahz+BAoCetfmlSU9SjChA+Lqf+jvDotLajWx4JABY79BKD5AnH1JfWGwWVty1uKg9n7qwl9Q H+4m/Ez4Wl98q20xrNk1LUhq4m4ufJ7vtmKIiyhtMOKjPq4zzYKrhJf7GZpjg6rKWOxT8R4a HxiiwtNchy9H/dF1vdyXCGumnd+Q0j5HP4xViTjWGLm72DeBsAB9dcnoUcSxPF6iMbzYlB+Z hW1GGUvYc/N2KloA3B5sPFXxwvtk24rWtKq590s1VjUJATYLIUkIoH/Ek9KuZmIAvG7ukcYY tTJfCZzq1ualWRY2rCsmRI29LEZAVpIj62Bmw5/uCF2Tlfm350i2ECwtYEo3sG/JUhD7FZ+u XtKM1T5fBzZ/5TSZg4KPYKQMOxBGCIawnLKniuLVPuE7xCE27RqqTw/K4+6IiRCdw15ap3vK 6EfEJTtGY0dU6rI9aJxod3/hfER3j4ejjx1MdE5dxctqfnTLTmdQ2PIWpe0PeIkrE6OIn2Sv yzMJVZD7vINm31A7tE2AX4Rt1cMn8bXMoJussqWl6Hr87RQ7ea89DzQbL2Hv7AADwkUmTwDj 8oRz7oPvhN6UitRzv5jXHqKjfQU3262ag1PLnR/uAVxoRIHJZLqBIphVOw4dzOLTVDt6cxbV ZvOb+PqNL9mUCGuULzq0l5MBtUCUhYpJ/6VWlRmAMMO0ToNbAZu9uefmhW1GCdJgB2St7XFA I3nSU0xYuHa7irgQwyAdOuNWyXy1EJomiRcpsakqqfodv+doggFZYgUqxpHQDNHxh48Dwa7l trWUshfAvyBznugaKqgNgoH+nZbcB7mxruC9VTs2jjuUKVotwPSnMXUyW1a9OehR8jSlNv9w RM2p5apIDFuD60bUMjnewzMTR3GRuqKYMDKD7AWaJ5tfTAfhpqQWKDmDqA4itDBFbC/1kOh2 DnMC2fcezKBF0YoXxDzqP26jpPBxWgVkZramlNtIV3GWHd00wDoNOjd+691XCcZUAFxfxYOD bZYSEKKgcr3Nyv0gWJ8QzyWEkO19ErPubHCq4kfKyW0nSxKJeQnaVuJY4ewL91cNTvuPQMS+ SRZkucKy75Efog30iQqmw+MCd57HkinvWA4myu0EGomHo+C+HVOlJoWvUSJMyd9XHtQ7KQy4 pi5OhFy9eYIyH0cJqL2KvXZzlMJlfapnO3VfghrdRRsbgpvLV+EpHHWVLzpT169QR7KN2xmF IVQax97ryEIINpcsAIcy9S/1Yilr20XQMWmx2zBvV7cUAmjnfdMd/M/qHBrqA3BFad4AT3Il uS/kRmjoD4djrG0aRfDa0+IW5bMhdhrHtj+f6PbI3WBkGhcfpZ8F+zL3+6d/tcRcG+aMAthw c/58vNmemdMzf80kTXuzBwJ6pV6WapQc+oGmu3aKd12s3/PU7Jm7eg5c64kSz+RjS6YVkJnI EtTz1jUu1Tzj05yJAt2ie8SqbrslsonltX7zZgjEPs0OGdkRPmNFADNxbYjJVQVSRSNXbNjd 2ty5nq6EjA X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true Received: from 4.172-242-81.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be (HELO kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org) ([81.242.172.4]) by relay.proximus.be with ESMTP; 04 May 2021 17:51:07 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTP id 144Fp6di012074; Tue, 4 May 2021 17:51:06 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from tijl@FreeBSD.org) Date: Tue, 4 May 2021 17:51:05 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?VMSzbA==?= Coosemans To: "Julian H. Stacey" Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: /usr/ports/print/ghostscript9-agpl-base gs_ll3.ps: Error: /undefinedresource (fwd) Message-ID: <20210504175105.6e61b2d2@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <202105041429.144ETlTq098537@fire.js.berklix.net> References: <202105041429.144ETlTq098537@fire.js.berklix.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FZPTB4q92z3R2t X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.00 / 15.00]; local_wl_from(0.00)[freebsd.org]; ASN(0.00)[asn:5432, ipnet:195.238.0.0/19, country:BE] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 May 2021 15:51:11 -0000 On Tue, 04 May 2021 16:29:47 +0200 "Julian H. Stacey" wrote: > Hi ports@ people, > I wrote this to doceng@FreeBSD.org Sun, 02 May 2021 23:43:44 +0200 > but no reply by Tue May 4 16:26:48 CEST 2021. > Have others seen similar or got ideas to fix gs ghostscript ? > ----------- > > Hi doceng@FreeBSD.org > as MAINTAINER= in /usr/ports/print/ghostscript9-agpl-base > > I'm stuck, gs fails to start, suggestions please ? > > FreeBSD lapr.js.berklix.net 12.2-STABLE FreeBSD 12.2-STABLE #1038: Mon Feb 15 02:04:28 CET 2021 jhs@lapr.no.berklix.net:/data/release/s2/usr/src/sys/amd64/compile/LAPR.small amd64 > > % printenv > PATH=/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/games:/usr/local/bin > TERM=xterm > DESTDIR=/ > TERMPATH=/etc/termcap:/usr/share/misc/termcap > NOCLEANDEPENDS= > % printenv > PATH=/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/games:/usr/local/bin > TERM=xterm > DESTDIR=/ > TERMPATH=/etc/termcap:/usr/share/misc/termcap > NOCLEANDEPENDS= > > % which gs > /usr/local/bin/gs > % ls -l /usr/local/bin/gs > - -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 7648 Apr 29 11:02 /usr/local/bin/gs* > > gs > GPL Ghostscript 9.52 (2020-03-19) > Copyright (C) 2020 Artifex Software, Inc. All rights reserved. > This software is supplied under the GNU AGPLv3 and comes with NO WARRANTY: > see the file COPYING for details. > While reading gs_ll3.ps: > Error: /undefinedresource in findresource > Operand stack: > (gs_icc.ps\000gs_mex_e.ps\000gs_mro_e.ps\000gs_pdf_e.ps\000gs_wan_e.ps\000pdf_ops.ps\000pdf_rbld.ps\000pdf_base.ps\000pdf_draw.ps\000gs_cff.ps\000gs_mgl_e.ps\000gs_ttf.ps\000pdf_font.ps\000pdf_main.ps\000pdf_sec.ps\000gs_epsf.ps\000gs_pdfwr.ps) (gs_ll3.ps) 1 Pscript5Idiom.pkgsave IdiomSet 6 Pscript5Idiom.pkgsave > Execution stack: > %interp_exit --nostringval-- findresource %loop_continue findresource findresource findresource false 1 %stopped_push --nostringval-- 1902 7 5 %oparray_pop findresource findresource --dict:16/18(ro)(G)-- --dict:2/2(G)-- findresource 2 %dict_continue findresource findresource 1900 5 5 %oparray_pop findresource %errorexec_pop findresource findresource findresource findresource > Dictionary stack: > --dict:943/1123(G)-- --dict:0/20(G)-- --dict:77/200(L)-- --dict:943/1123(G)-- --dict:38/43(G)-- --dict:16/18(ro)(G)-- > Current allocation mode is global > Current file position is 18941 > > Any ideas please ? > I rebuilt my machine with make worl & generic then custom kernel & > a load of downloaded pkg > pkg info -a | wc -l > 1348 > > ive since run > cd /usr/ports/print/ghostscript9-agpl-base > make clean > make reinstall > > gs -help > ends > /usr/local/share/ghostscript/9.52/Resource/Init : > /usr/local/share/ghostscript/9.52/lib : > /usr/local/share/ghostscript/9.52/Resource/Font : > /usr/local/share/ghostscript/fonts : /usr/local/share/fonts > Ghostscript is also using fontconfig to search for font files > > my /usr/local/share/ghostscript/9.52/Resource/ has no Init should it ? > drwxr-xr-x 2 root bin 4608 May 2 22:33 ./ > drwxr-xr-x 11 root bin 512 May 2 22:33 ../ > - -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 3297 May 2 22:23 FAPIcidfmap > - -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 3297 Jun 16 2020 FAPIcidfmap.pkgsave > - -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 1158 May 2 22:23 FAPIconfig > - -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 1158 Jun 16 2020 FAPIconfig.pkgsave > - -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 1468 May 2 22:23 FAPIfontmap > - -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 1468 Jun 16 2020 FAPIfontmap.pkgsave > - -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 2857 May 2 22:23 FCOfontmap-PCLPS2 > - -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 2857 Jun 16 2020 FCOfontmap-PCLPS2.pkgsave > - -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 109 May 2 22:23 Fontmap > - -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 12929 May 2 22:23 Fontmap.GS > - -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 12929 Jun 16 2020 Fontmap.GS.pkgsave > - -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 109 Jun 16 2020 Fontmap.pkgsave > - -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 4183 May 2 22:23 cidfmap > - -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 4183 Jun 16 2020 cidfmap.pkgsave > - -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 218021 May 2 22:23 gs_agl.ps > > /usr/local/share/ghostscript/fonts > - -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 13643 Sep 19 2020 Fontmap > - -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 13643 Jul 6 2019 Fontmap.pkgsave > lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 49 Sep 19 2020 GothicBBB-Medium@ -> /usr/local/share/fonts/std.ja_JP/GothicBBB-Medium > lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 53 Sep 19 2020 GothicBBB-Medium.gs7@ -> /usr/local/share/fonts/std.ja_JP/GothicBBB-Medium.gs7 > lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 44 Sep 19 2020 MSung-Light@ -> /usr/local/share/fonts/std.zh_CN/MSung-Light > lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 45 Sep 19 2020 Ryumin-Light@ -> /usr/local/share/fonts/std.ja_JP/Ryumin-Light > lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 49 Sep 19 2020 Ryumin-Light.gs7@ -> /usr/local/share/fonts/std.ja_JP/Ryumin-Light.gs7 > lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 48 Sep 19 2020 STHeiti-Regular@ -> /usr/local/share/fonts/std.zh_CN/STHeiti-Regular > lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 45 Sep 19 2020 STSong-Light@ -> /usr/local/share/fonts/std.zh_CN/STSong-Light > - -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 42833 Sep 19 2020 a010013l.afm > > - -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 19572 May 2 20:23 /usr/local/share/ghostscript/9.52/Resource/Init/gs_ll3.ps > MD5 (share/ghostscript/9.52/Resource/Init/gs_ll3.ps) = 9c92e1f0a9fbde8aff39ab3d49e1e35b > > Could this be a font problem ? > > I used to see fontconfig errs with firefox, but that starts > without error now, as does exmh so I guess its not fontfig. > > BTW I chased this problem back from this failing > cat thing.ps | /usr/local/bin/ps2pdf -sPAPERSIZE=a4 - thing.pdf > > Hope you can help please, if I should provide more info please let me know. Delete all those .pkgsave files. These are backups created by pkg when it has to install a file over an existing file. It means a previous version of ghostscript wasn't deleted properly. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue May 4 15:53:26 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C43D76370D1 for ; Tue, 4 May 2021 15:53:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fjwcash@gmail.com) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FZPWp42pvz3hRH for ; Tue, 4 May 2021 15:53:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fjwcash@gmail.com) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 8AAFA63715A; Tue, 4 May 2021 15:53:26 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A76463724B for ; Tue, 4 May 2021 15:53:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fjwcash@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qk1-x733.google.com (mail-qk1-x733.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::733]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FZPWp3LqHz3hby for ; Tue, 4 May 2021 15:53:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fjwcash@gmail.com) Received: by mail-qk1-x733.google.com with SMTP id i67so5875370qkc.4 for ; Tue, 04 May 2021 08:53:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=/4jNTjlDO8W0sFSxSVT2oONmYKcDsICO46oHETCUK10=; b=QPwD4UqucAovaR00tvslwXmjuHaXwzj4cEx9PQkI4l56Ho7ARpuE3wEewRQtNhnc0n lAifglU37hqR9QtcCqTsUrjOFAnEVSDHQhgHU8DKyHgoH/zwU0drVs7I7WipZTJFdHMp GCLrxDZtoJ6etA1/m3uWF8VewuV/gQmK6U+CWmG8G3pIYUZazXYxEKi+KewbpIpoMdoB EKe6+f3KgtQaIh0DDfs3l0OWZ150uKbHECIOGM0s3G0mPRVtZM0dh2Z9+tpbY159cNso wow2UOnGqcrEaPB7HnB5E6yewp25iVRa/U7KAsbCedk7kRy7lHlbeUy4/rdV/tMgezwF 8Yog== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=/4jNTjlDO8W0sFSxSVT2oONmYKcDsICO46oHETCUK10=; b=KZBWC2E3dpYkAXkvPHF7Z7+VfhNd9Ddihd0KgLRtMI/dSp+mPnEpsz26dwltwg/zHk S517l0DhfEmsLFggdqcPQeZoCLNTHFOkIA9xEfbO115zgEymVnAK6PnXXmoxQIQtJq/E JR6880TE1tjk86Eq369e7QHVCE9hx76KLNySsRr2vcIRvSpiJNo/PVoKLq2WDE4MEAsU 2ks4ISLH4BSy9FGN0dBgSQnUfLmQXw75LurYIEd3PHnKY0ggG2flVMCBI+0+OIJuC3St oFEUG9RR7uCIqYMapjKleBZsg/dOyi8xG8id4Q7Dp5X5/NcMJcq+N00wnnExoRCGFOcu YLgw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531hzxTVp2I8acFsQNGfFwfifAUPzH7CzuXDAR0Z5QrOApcCutQh jiMrXL656HU4mKSJG4XB177mvB6hNJp9FcT2Gsj1eXQu X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwEHll7+lqJA/srGS8wD4gBCgcDmdKrKvjoQtaYXcG9M3Bij/7vp4HAiOQN4JDBMHVUcLAiMY7DM7y9Gm2jcSU= X-Received: by 2002:a37:384:: with SMTP id 126mr3660640qkd.387.1620143605724; Tue, 04 May 2021 08:53:25 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <24721.26936.103525.451533@jerusalem.litteratus.org> In-Reply-To: <24721.26936.103525.451533@jerusalem.litteratus.org> From: Freddie Cash Date: Tue, 4 May 2021 08:53:14 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: looking for port origin for executable To: Robert Huff Cc: FreeBSD Ports Mailing List X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FZPWp3LqHz3hby X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.34 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 May 2021 15:53:26 -0000 On Tue, May 4, 2021 at 8:33 AM Robert Huff wrote: > Would some kind soul please tell me which port installs the > executable "g-ir-scanner"? I was purging unused ports and seem to > have done this one by mistake. > http://freshports.org allows you to do searches of pkg-plist files. It's a little finicky, though. Doing a search for "g-ir-scanner" returns 0 hits, regardless of what type of search is done. Doing a search for "bin/g-ir-scanner" returns gobject-introspection. So if you know the path for the file (relative to /usr/local), then the search works. -- Freddie Cash fjwcash@gmail.com From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue May 4 15:59:33 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31C7A6373EF for ; Tue, 4 May 2021 15:59:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ros@bebik.net) Received: from smtp.osorio.me (mvd.osorio.me [5.196.94.126]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FZPfr37qLz3hZv for ; Tue, 4 May 2021 15:59:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ros@bebik.net) Received: from [192.168.69.184] (unknown [78.194.61.125]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.osorio.me (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C35891251C3 for ; Tue, 4 May 2021 15:59:30 +0000 (UTC) From: Rodrigo Osorio Subject: Re: looking for port origin for executable To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <24721.26936.103525.451533@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Message-ID: Date: Tue, 4 May 2021 17:59:31 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FZPfr37qLz3hZv X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of ros@bebik.net designates 5.196.94.126 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=ros@bebik.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.20 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[5.196.94.126:from]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[5.196.94.126:from:127.0.2.255]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[bebik.net]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; RCVD_NO_TLS_LAST(0.10)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:16276, ipnet:5.196.0.0/16, country:FR]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-ports]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[78.194.61.125:received] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 May 2021 15:59:33 -0000 On 5/4/21 3:53 PM, Freddie Cash wrote: > On Tue, May 4, 2021 at 8:33 AM Robert Huff wrote: > >> Would some kind soul please tell me which port installs the >> executable "g-ir-scanner"? I was purging unused ports and seem to >> have done this one by mistake. >> > http://freshports.org allows you to do searches of pkg-plist files. It's a > little finicky, though. > > Doing a search for "g-ir-scanner" returns 0 hits, regardless of what type > of search is done. > > Doing a search for "bin/g-ir-scanner" returns gobject-introspection. > > So if you know the path for the file (relative to /usr/local), then the > search works. > pkg-provides also does the job :) % pkg provides g-ir-scanner Name    : gobject-introspection-1.66.1,1 Desc    : Generate interface introspection data for GObject libraries Repo    : FreeBSD Filename: usr/local/man/man1/g-ir-scanner.1.gz           usr/local/bin/g-ir-scanner From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue May 4 15:59:33 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1FC96374CF for ; Tue, 4 May 2021 15:59:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portmaster@bsdforge.com) Received: from udns.ultimatedns.net (static-24-113-41-81.wavecable.com [24.113.41.81]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "ultimatedns.net", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FZPfs1zrDz3j11 for ; Tue, 4 May 2021 15:59:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portmaster@bsdforge.com) Received: from ultimatedns.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by udns.ultimatedns.net (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTP id 144FxYNa005982; Tue, 4 May 2021 08:59:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from portmaster@bsdforge.com) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 04 May 2021 08:59:34 -0700 From: Chris To: "@lbutlr" Cc: FreeBSD Subject: Re: Ports recompile for 13.0-RELEASE In-Reply-To: References: User-Agent: UDNSMS/17.0 Message-ID: X-Sender: portmaster@bsdforge.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FZPfs1zrDz3j11 X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.00 / 15.00]; ASN(0.00)[asn:11404, ipnet:24.113.0.0/16, country:US]; local_wl_ip(0.00)[24.113.41.81] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 May 2021 15:59:33 -0000 On 2021-05-04 07:10, @lbutlr wrote: > With the move to FreeBSD 13.0 is there a simple (single step) way to > reinstall all > the current ports other than saving off a list of the ports and then > stepping > through that list to reinstall them? It was very inefficient when moving to > 12.0 > as many ports in the list, of course, were dependent on other ports, but > then got > recompiled, sometimes multiple times. I know I ended up in a make loop where > came > was compiled over and over again until I aborted, listed the current ports, > differ > on the previous ports, and picked a port I though would have a lot of reps > to > restart the compile. I then did this several more times to get back to where > I had > been on 11.x > > And there's still no way to tell if a port was installed from pkg or from > ports, > correct? Since I use MariaDB instead of MySQLI have to be sure I don't try > to use > package for anything that will try to install MySQL instead. > > And finally, the release of 13.0 ends the 12.x versions, right? There will > not be a 12.3. > > (And yes, I've tried moving to poudrerie several times and we do not get on. > At all.) Not a big fan of poudrerie. If I must, I generally choose synth. But try to avoid both if at all possible. jail(8) is my go-to for most things they try to facilitate. While this isn't the simple "set it, and forget it" solution you seek. I find that picking a meta-port/package as part of something I'm installing, gets me pretty close to all I need. The key to my method is the "recursive" keyword. IOW # cd /usr/ports/x11/xorg/ # make config-recursive (repeat this until dialog stops appearing) When complete # make package-recursive (install) clean If I'm in my build jail and have a /usr/ports/packages/(All|latest) I (ultimately) end up with a nice package repo that facilitates an image install or upgrade path from a fresh install. HTH --Chris From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue May 4 16:20:18 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 783F85F82A7 for ; Tue, 4 May 2021 16:20:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kremels@kreme.com) Received: from mail.covisp.net (mail.covisp.net [65.121.55.42]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FZQ6m5knsz3kBv for ; Tue, 4 May 2021 16:20:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kremels@kreme.com) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: Ports recompile for 13.0-RELEASE From: "@lbutlr" In-Reply-To: <8093cca5-520e-436f-4a7d-8ce1bf680ca7@klop.ws> Date: Tue, 4 May 2021 10:20:14 -0600 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <9182B8A2-3359-44CD-A99C-3F04D3E3772D@kreme.com> References: <8093cca5-520e-436f-4a7d-8ce1bf680ca7@klop.ws> To: FreeBSD X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.80.0.2.43) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FZQ6m5knsz3kBv X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of kremels@kreme.com designates 65.121.55.42 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=kremels@kreme.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.40 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[65.121.55.42:from]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; MISSING_MIME_VERSION(2.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[kreme.com]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[65.121.55.42:from:127.0.2.255]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; RCVD_COUNT_ZERO(0.00)[0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:209, ipnet:65.112.0.0/12, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-ports]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[65.121.55.42:from] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 May 2021 16:20:18 -0000 On 04 May 2021, at 09:00, Ronald Klop wrote: > On 5/4/21 4:10 PM, @lbutlr wrote: >> With the move to FreeBSD 13.0 is there a simple (single step) way to = reinstall all the current ports other than saving off a list of the = ports and then stepping through that list to reinstall them? It was very = inefficient when moving to 12.0 as many ports in the list, of course, = were dependent on other ports, but then got recompiled, sometimes = multiple times. I know I ended up in a make loop where came was compiled = over and over again until I aborted, listed the current ports, differ on = the previous ports, and picked a port I though would have a lot of reps = to restart the compile. I then did this several more times to get back = to where I had been on 11.x >=20 > I used "portmaster -fa" in the past. Yeah, that's what I tried wen moving to 12.0 from 11.4 and it left a lot = of cleaning up. >> (And yes, I've tried moving to poudrerie several times and we do not = get on. At all.) >=20 > Might help to do another attempt. Especially if you are using custom = port settings instead of pkgs. It just doesn't work the way my brain works, and I don't have a bunch of = servers I need to keep updated, and the two servers I am running are = different architecture. Something as simple as "hey, I want to install = this one port" seemed overly complicated. I can see it's great when you = have a cluster of servers and want to manage the updates on a dedicated = server, but I don't need that. That said: # pkg-static upgrade -f # portmaster install postfix dovecot=20 So far, so good (I thought I would have to also redo MariaDB but it all = seems to be working now, mail did not work until I recompiled Dovecot = and Postfix, but I was expecting that. So far the only thing that is new is an error about pam_opie, but that's = for a new thread. --=20 Incredible! One of the worst performances of my career and they never doubted it for a second. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue May 4 17:28:56 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BCB05FB0CB for ; Tue, 4 May 2021 17:28:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ps.ports@smyrak.com) Received: from m-09.smrt1.linuxpl.com (m-09.smrt1.linuxpl.com [78.46.219.98]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FZRdz06smz3p0T for ; Tue, 4 May 2021 17:28:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ps.ports@smyrak.com) Received: from [88.198.46.46] (helo=s33.cyber-folks.pl) by smrt1.linuxpl.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92.2) (envelope-from ) id 1ldyqp-000EiT-KC for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Tue, 04 May 2021 19:28:52 +0200 Received: from 93-181-165-201.internetia.net.pl ([93.181.165.201] helo=daleth.home) by s33.cyber-folks.pl with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1ldyqp-0005Ck-4r for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Tue, 04 May 2021 19:28:51 +0200 Date: Tue, 4 May 2021 19:28:48 +0200 From: Piotr Smyrak To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: looking for port origin for executable Message-ID: <20210504192848.7e255495@daleth.home> In-Reply-To: <24721.26936.103525.451533@jerusalem.litteratus.org> References: <24721.26936.103525.451533@jerusalem.litteratus.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.8 (GTK+ 2.24.33; amd64-portbld-freebsd12.2) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FZRdz06smz3p0T X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of ps.ports@smyrak.com designates 78.46.219.98 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=ps.ports@smyrak.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.01 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[78.46.219.98:from]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:78.46.219.0/24]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[smyrak.com]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[78.46.219.98:from:127.0.2.255]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.77)[-0.765]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.94)[-0.941]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[78.46.219.98:from]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:78.46.0.0/15, country:DE]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-ports] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 May 2021 17:28:56 -0000 On Tue, 4 May 2021 11:33:12 -0400 Robert Huff wrote: > Would some kind soul please tell me which port installs the > executable "g-ir-scanner"? I was purging unused ports and seem to > have done this one by mistake. When I hit a wall like this, this is my usual way to get around without any additional tools: $ find /usr/ports -name pkg-plist | xargs grep -l bin/g-ir-scanner -- Piotr Smyrak From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue May 4 17:30:02 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 387415FB35D for ; Tue, 4 May 2021 17:30:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tatsuki_makino@hotmail.com) Received: from APC01-PU1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-oln040092254029.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.92.254.29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.protection.outlook.com", Issuer "DigiCert Cloud Services CA-1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FZRgD4fBjz3ntt for ; Tue, 4 May 2021 17:30:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tatsuki_makino@hotmail.com) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=XR2uBazicnHg+0brbJWdKNBgWIaRPNHdGwDbfPl0Ej1U7GrAWwtVeAaUfF9FIC4D7XSvIe+mL2f7kg5MNOMsi9LniHYVY00f7w9DGBUvIEv0z7HAkoQ3Nz09IcNXf3b1Nile0jyNp8I9Ntx0/6ooT01xGMSZW3KbQ0QvgqPdasVdCGjbuEl7WqZN/IPkyrypXwTU0OmIY59olgOHY9Cmr+2y6f1I9d3MFVfoDgRmyxKRlE9GWX5bSeLkjnO6aC2QS/5zQD9shMkQt6sz4MvBXI7aJZOH5XG7wlvwsSZwcC8/eGlh9BmdLudYbr/MqPFJSHfa61rBA82CnJAconHRYQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=taVif8l3zN03gW07Yffl3u7bgAmijhTHjcEZyCGrccI=; b=TWlNVpmrzKLXzcin+7ZSon+aMolKTun/dTmOjtNy/PRM4gEg5qWkAgHD5RgOVvRvgR0EFWewrjX/wFY2Xti3ekALROtY9B9VxCxMdYalH1+oFq95sgvxQrEuBi6LAojw33PFK0N5lKrP3xD4KGp0lL6cmYUXwoNP892L9xmZ+0IMb0eX9FV3n2pxe5xBCaGV2/xHtPVTOHVxngVqTbYn0XWD1OQEmjM5zvDwhnC2G2PQLpLnSEsyzrKnvoyv2vRlVR4z8EoUVMzo/e8CNLnpygkLUS0BBDuFGrMvM6HQyVQ4NNEGD7LIdsVFMFX7afUT9iGo1Zs+9z5ajeIcObWt6A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=none; dmarc=none; dkim=none; arc=none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hotmail.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=taVif8l3zN03gW07Yffl3u7bgAmijhTHjcEZyCGrccI=; b=UeR5/RD+CK9RiAkBiXqw/hVpo8oSi03aWDn4gpXuPtdxYXy/EJc2ferfFIVg4A+vCGK9vUnzlgmXotQdn7VOo3PWeYFNguGb/C65HZUcS94kcTtTdGV6H3eb0BSJv83osVVyuOMdqURpgpGMSmx5GZgzBDgV1uG9lPFDunXbfrfDGqgB1RAuWToMuV0jWMeSTWnjzizB6/4XpChGLe8nxMmLDX5KxIQEy2NcbGgWkAMZPOiUl2UXX9Evgx9LBFwYCRQLkItwVuTeB67T/Apqas6MX6BcmjnqvsYblcOZxMXOKnQIkdVf81iXX2qaAvs/HwFHQaAeqgH7izfkjKrrxw== Received: from PSAPR03MB5639.apcprd03.prod.outlook.com (2603:1096:301:66::13) by PU1PR03MB2794.apcprd03.prod.outlook.com (2603:1096:803:17::23) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.4108.13; Tue, 4 May 2021 17:29:57 +0000 Received: from PSAPR03MB5639.apcprd03.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::c4ad:238c:5d96:7290]) by PSAPR03MB5639.apcprd03.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::c4ad:238c:5d96:7290%7]) with mapi id 15.20.4108.025; Tue, 4 May 2021 17:29:57 +0000 Subject: Re: looking for port origin for executable To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <24721.26936.103525.451533@jerusalem.litteratus.org> From: Tatsuki Makino Message-ID: Date: Wed, 5 May 2021 02:29:54 +0900 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/52.0 SeaMonkey/2.49.4 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-TMN: [D7ruTma0t9ylGC480vqpUkGgcpZEQdDo] X-ClientProxiedBy: TY2PR01CA0016.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com (2603:1096:404:a::28) To PSAPR03MB5639.apcprd03.prod.outlook.com (2603:1096:301:66::13) X-Microsoft-Original-Message-ID: <1d7bacd4-dfc6-28ee-6b7f-bfaac9eefd0e@hotmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MS-Exchange-MessageSentRepresentingType: 1 Received: from T4.test (121.95.66.131) by TY2PR01CA0016.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com (2603:1096:404:a::28) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.4087.27 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 4 May 2021 17:29:56 +0000 X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: e5907e11-ea23-4ded-0aa1-08d90f223c8d X-MS-Exchange-SLBlob-MailProps: 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 X-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: PU1PR03MB2794: X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0; X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info: 1gvHLa/Rn53sMDSpG2sgoksKs8XFX1bqRBEum53GNuynRjjmkEKfGluLtzbnaAjsYnhniaBdrPnoyN6HpL6qCkt5s4QmTVDsvtPZItvBfxvMJojhFnSXUkTeN5zd9wqfka8CRVQI6C5uI3Jvcb0dUnKBWVzx/WJxpToyaiF1YKsW7aiT0cfbmptOv47Rsmf9Z6xGs99s1Avm8kcWrrxPcCuqYONy5KtbTiYXBJXq9lmZMq5s7/8ET1s2Ljrv0xp0wfJvRrC1yoC3S7rYQlChwXsyK7OyFGIgNZlMfi2eEpSqlXpSHJvtTmHF9n8NNbM4NJQGUI4e2+XcEXf/JsGegfN3oxw285XaCwMtQy4Y7Hzwjn9vRsAp0gm715s0HGvG8zegFLPJXPQa9jefb5zudg== X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData: 6nwTCeUzJC1AIdOs/bF0hgeDjb2L4dG5+3p2TUmLmUmgtE7YepVoj4HUujNspGZwBcnBCWy99K1qJyVCj2jKjaJL+UvDCWHQVlbHDI40PO1IsoVL6emP6ggm0qLJjLlG9qXmVGbdSF0Fmhq1fmPNFQ== X-OriginatorOrg: sct-15-20-3174-8-msonline-outlook-792b7.templateTenant X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: e5907e11-ea23-4ded-0aa1-08d90f223c8d X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: PSAPR03MB5639.apcprd03.prod.outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 May 2021 17:29:57.1624 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-RMS-PersistedConsumerOrg: 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000 X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: PU1PR03MB2794 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FZRgD4fBjz3ntt X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=hotmail.com header.s=selector1 header.b=UeR5/RD+; arc=pass (microsoft.com:s=arcselector9901:i=1); dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=hotmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of tatsuki_makino@hotmail.com designates 40.92.254.29 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=tatsuki_makino@hotmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.49 / 15.00]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[hotmail.com]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:40.92.0.0/15]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[hotmail.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[hotmail.com,none]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.99)[-0.991]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[40.92.254.29:from]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[hotmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:8075, ipnet:40.80.0.0/12, country:US]; ARC_ALLOW(-1.00)[microsoft.com:s=arcselector9901:i=1]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[hotmail.com:s=selector1]; FORGED_MUA_SEAMONKEY_MSGID_UNKNOWN(2.50)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[hotmail.com:dkim]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[40.92.254.29:from:127.0.2.255]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[40.92.254.29:from]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[40.92.254.29:from]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-ports] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 May 2021 17:30:02 -0000 Rodrigo Osorio wrote on 2021/05/05 00:59: > pkg-provides also does the job :) > > % pkg provides g-ir-scanner > > Name    : gobject-introspection-1.66.1,1 > Desc    : Generate interface introspection data for GObject libraries > Repo    : FreeBSD > Filename: usr/local/man/man1/g-ir-scanner.1.gz >           usr/local/bin/g-ir-scanner Where can I find pkg provides? <--- ports-mgmt/pkg-provides :) If it's somewhere in the PATH, pkg which -p g-ir-scanner is fine. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue May 4 18:48:31 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A06775FDD34 for ; Tue, 4 May 2021 18:48:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ros@bebik.net) Received: from smtp.osorio.me (mvd.osorio.me [5.196.94.126]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FZTPp3qGSz3t2D for ; Tue, 4 May 2021 18:48:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ros@bebik.net) Received: from [192.168.69.184] (unknown [78.194.61.125]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.osorio.me (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B62771253E1 for ; Tue, 4 May 2021 18:48:28 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: looking for port origin for executable To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <24721.26936.103525.451533@jerusalem.litteratus.org> From: Rodrigo Osorio Message-ID: Date: Tue, 4 May 2021 20:48:28 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FZTPp3qGSz3t2D X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of ros@bebik.net designates 5.196.94.126 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=ros@bebik.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.20 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[5.196.94.126:from]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx:c]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[5.196.94.126:from:127.0.2.255]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[bebik.net]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; RCVD_NO_TLS_LAST(0.10)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:16276, ipnet:5.196.0.0/16, country:FR]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-ports]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[78.194.61.125:received] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 May 2021 18:48:31 -0000 On 5/4/21 5:29 PM, Tatsuki Makino wrote: > Rodrigo Osorio wrote on 2021/05/05 00:59: >> pkg-provides also does the job :) >> >> % pkg provides g-ir-scanner >> >> Name    : gobject-introspection-1.66.1,1 >> Desc    : Generate interface introspection data for GObject libraries >> Repo    : FreeBSD >> Filename: usr/local/man/man1/g-ir-scanner.1.gz >>           usr/local/bin/g-ir-scanner > Where can I find pkg provides? <--- ports-mgmt/pkg-provides :) Absolutely ! > > If it's somewhere in the PATH, pkg which -p g-ir-scanner is fine. Sure, pkg-provides helps you to identify the package for a tool you wanna use :) > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue May 4 15:58:04 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B3106373E7 for ; Tue, 4 May 2021 15:58:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rodrigo@osorio.me) Received: from smtp.osorio.me (mvd.osorio.me [5.196.94.126]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FZPd73dz5z3hp4 for ; Tue, 4 May 2021 15:58:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rodrigo@osorio.me) Received: from [192.168.69.184] (unknown [78.194.61.125]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.osorio.me (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CF4651251B1 for ; Tue, 4 May 2021 15:57:54 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: looking for port origin for executable To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <24721.26936.103525.451533@jerusalem.litteratus.org> From: Rodrigo Osorio Message-ID: Date: Tue, 4 May 2021 17:57:55 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FZPd73dz5z3hp4 X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of rodrigo@osorio.me has no SPF policy when checking 5.196.94.126) smtp.mailfrom=rodrigo@osorio.me X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.00 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; RCVD_NO_TLS_LAST(0.10)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[5.196.94.126:from]; ASN(0.00)[asn:16276, ipnet:5.196.0.0/16, country:FR]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[78.194.61.125:received]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; FREEFALL_USER(0.00)[rodrigo]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[5.196.94.126:from:127.0.2.255]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[osorio.me]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-ports] X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 04 May 2021 19:27:52 +0000 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 May 2021 15:58:04 -0000 On 5/4/21 3:53 PM, Freddie Cash wrote: > On Tue, May 4, 2021 at 8:33 AM Robert Huff wrote: > >> Would some kind soul please tell me which port installs the >> executable "g-ir-scanner"? I was purging unused ports and seem to >> have done this one by mistake. >> > http://freshports.org allows you to do searches of pkg-plist files. It's a > little finicky, though. > > Doing a search for "g-ir-scanner" returns 0 hits, regardless of what type > of search is done. > > Doing a search for "bin/g-ir-scanner" returns gobject-introspection. > > So if you know the path for the file (relative to /usr/local), then the > search works. > pkg-provides also does the job :) % pkg provides g-ir-scanner Name    : gobject-introspection-1.66.1,1 Desc    : Generate interface introspection data for GObject libraries Repo    : FreeBSD Filename: usr/local/man/man1/g-ir-scanner.1.gz           usr/local/bin/g-ir-scanner From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue May 4 18:11:30 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E0D05FC73A for ; Tue, 4 May 2021 18:11:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wlosh@bsdimp.com) Received: from mail-qk1-x729.google.com (mail-qk1-x729.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::729]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FZSb52wy4z3qZW for ; Tue, 4 May 2021 18:11:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wlosh@bsdimp.com) Received: by mail-qk1-x729.google.com with SMTP id x8so9518037qkl.2 for ; Tue, 04 May 2021 11:11:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bsdimp-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=OCyX9og81OVeVrEaM9kKso5xx8J7tOU55wPhJcTZgFg=; b=qlUirFfgOrrF2haPQ3UJFJlaV4u/XtuIwQZiJ0lFStw0aTd089z1HLeYFjxKF1/vPg 8mVSY1O97Y4TGGd4bCFkzTMaa8EXe0BzVUq7QRh7sK2BoDTqhYFF8lSukdzTnByJhEMG twmuRZ094h3UYLEHX05eokDAveMghN2WNnWDfmPXiaCBF4KB4BFNSVTXG2CZzLyhGnVj AgfljA6f14vIBwzf4ucrasaKnkxk3kRJZd0kgVgt1I1GuaBmJxRXDy26p7rermXIpq86 q1cL7qlD8WrlJdk7axNP8OvdRdwXzSTj+rjn/k9GUQ0gqATWTh1v5LaBGjhgWc/v5AGc T/qQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=OCyX9og81OVeVrEaM9kKso5xx8J7tOU55wPhJcTZgFg=; b=hRh07hgG7tfdmXGSmbAWwv0tKYaW3mgcW+sjxwg1iJjDvm2mUh7BUUb/Rol3SuOK3n 6tExe1APcUq8e0qmiAo1l9U3QQ1S863O+xpY3p/AcvH0jR909MaZlkT/p4l2cFyeTs86 8eKfs0kRBcg0xcbiMy13ywSkXCDCNRNiZ58wPU/MCm9Q9S8RXwZvEPd8K+SiEZRWFvyj Euvz4tyLefqLDfe7C4yogPbnAmVSDBqawmM5LVFJuNSMctH7QowVNsOjLp3doJfSkZCF UPeF4QzHtzHn4U+MUq7cw7v42dM403zHzqfcMKekQVAz3TCTpNWYV2NeQBPp1+FB6C3a yLTA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530hstTFidDzcALJLWnoMEdvTvbcy2jyrH69upixtedDsKmKu+K+ rSUWVeJzi9TN5ZdZW8b5d3NAwl8fzeoXQIuchti9L39bLebnYA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwqtqZ6yRB9/SzLCzN52GQ/7r8j0QORQvOW0T5almCW50EN7JvbIfM2S+hSbDo/g4ereq6jARhEd6JBOwLZBGg= X-Received: by 2002:a37:7685:: with SMTP id r127mr25218501qkc.359.1620151888356; Tue, 04 May 2021 11:11:28 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210503063701.GA34665@www.zefox.net> In-Reply-To: <20210503063701.GA34665@www.zefox.net> From: Warner Losh Date: Tue, 4 May 2021 12:11:17 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Xoscope nuisance console messages on Pi4 running -current To: bob prohaska Cc: "freebsd-arm@freebsd.org" , FreeBSD Ports X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FZSb52wy4z3qZW X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=bsdimp-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=qlUirFfg; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of wlosh@bsdimp.com has no SPF policy when checking 2607:f8b0:4864:20::729) smtp.mailfrom=wlosh@bsdimp.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.83 / 15.00]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_SOME(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[bsdimp-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com:s=20150623]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[bsdimp.com]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::729:from:127.0.2.255]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[bsdimp-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com:+]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.83)[-0.831]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::729:from]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[imp@bsdimp.com,wlosh@bsdimp.com]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::729:from]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[imp@bsdimp.com,wlosh@bsdimp.com]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-ports] X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 04 May 2021 19:28:34 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.34 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 May 2021 18:11:30 -0000 On Mon, May 3, 2021 at 12:38 AM bob prohaska wrote: > After a successful compile of audio/xoscope on a Pi4 running current a > stream of messages appeared on the console and in the security log > while xoscope was running: > > > +WARNING pid 26370 (xoscope): ioctl sign-extension ioctl ffffffffc0045006 > +WARNING pid 26370 (xoscope): ioctl sign-extension ioctl ffffffffc0045005 > +WARNING pid 26370 (xoscope): ioctl sign-extension ioctl ffffffffc0045002 > +WARNING pid 26370 (xoscope): ioctl sign-extension ioctl ffffffffc0045006 > +WARNING pid 26370 (xoscope): ioctl sign-extension ioctl ffffffffc0045005 > +WARNING pid 26370 (xoscope): ioctl sign-extension ioctl ffffffffc0045002 > > They seem to come at a fairly high rate and clutter the logfiles, but > apart from that nuisance nothing else seemed visibly amiss. > > Are they of any significance? > I fixed this a while ago, but some people copied our definitions which weren't sufficiently careful in using unsigned in places to avoid sign extension.... Warner From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue May 4 19:49:59 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1B0A5FFD67 for ; Tue, 4 May 2021 19:49:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yasu@utahime.org) Received: from maybe.home.utahime.org (gate.home.utahime.org [183.180.29.210]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FZVmk6R7vz4R56 for ; Tue, 4 May 2021 19:49:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yasu@utahime.org) Received: from eastasia.home.utahime.org (eastasia.home.utahime.org [192.168.174.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-384) server-digest SHA384) (No client certificate requested) by maybe.home.utahime.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 20034A061 for ; Wed, 5 May 2021 04:49:55 +0900 (JST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=utahime.org; s=maybe2019112701; t=1620157795; bh=P/fLvY82mnb7AJrUiMcAvCviTCt2+io/N5iTMxkNG9o=; h=Date:To:Subject:From; b=a4n9Y54+1V2H0iffu6Qg5j28ZzcpE8MWff483yJiRArLyAOyuZZ1+lZaDDBgBf7FI gL2SyFJsV3ycvUtU1uito2l8NeA1qIqIhanZDnicqYGmLjE64JySSVMzaOHreScKKW Ow+96raIWW1XdDRvWQxzqAn/cYy8XxzyXVHsntysxcYkj7+gQOeV4p21xObgSAWZTD 7Gsn691oYXKs+BnQO6Tj4nNjPTo+5PvQFkQ+HXAJgq7VKVGDtzM3R45Q/tnuP5Khrq WRSfs+3COg8IMYWeOtj0DBQwF4Zxz7CM5mg3naslasdewakXuYyr6c7OmZ3e7GZ8qM WEH2XZSvlDpOw== Received: from localhost (rolling.home.utahime.org [192.168.174.11]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-384) server-digest SHA384) (No client certificate requested) by eastasia.home.utahime.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4B6D3249B8; Wed, 5 May 2021 04:49:54 +0900 (JST) X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.103.2 at eastasia.home.utahime.org Date: Wed, 05 May 2021 04:49:04 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20210505.044904.213100914297809480.yasu@utahime.org> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Making a port to use OpenSSL of ports collection on FreeBSD 11.x From: Yasuhiro Kimura X-Mailer: Mew version 6.8 on Emacs 27.2 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FZVmk6R7vz4R56 X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=utahime.org header.s=maybe2019112701 header.b=a4n9Y54+; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of yasu@utahime.org designates 183.180.29.210 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=yasu@utahime.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.70 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+a:spf-authorized.utahime.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; HFILTER_HELO_IP_A(1.00)[maybe.home.utahime.org]; HFILTER_HELO_NORES_A_OR_MX(0.30)[maybe.home.utahime.org]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[utahime.org:+]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[183.180.29.210:from]; ASN(0.00)[asn:2519, ipnet:183.180.0.0/16, country:JP]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[utahime.org:s=maybe2019112701]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[utahime.org]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[183.180.29.210:from:127.0.2.255]; MID_CONTAINS_FROM(1.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-ports] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 May 2021 19:49:59 -0000 Hello, Of the currently supported FreeBSD versions, base system of FreeBSD 11.x uses OpenSSL 1.0.2 and that of FreeBSD 12.x or later use OpenSSL 1.1.1. Then when new version of an application dropped suport of OpenSSL 1.0.2, is there any way to make the port of it to use OpenSSL of ports collection if the system is FreeBSD 11.x? Best Regards. --- Yasuhiro Kimura From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue May 4 20:02:08 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 879E76213A9 for ; Tue, 4 May 2021 20:02:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from slim.berklix.org (slim.berklix.org [94.185.90.68]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "slim.berklix.org", Issuer "slim.berklix.org" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FZW2k2fqGz4Rg4; Tue, 4 May 2021 20:02:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from mart.js.berklix.net (p4fc4c0dd.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [79.196.192.221]) (authenticated bits=128) by slim.berklix.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id 144K1uKe080910 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 4 May 2021 22:02:00 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (fire.js.berklix.net [192.168.91.41]) by mart.js.berklix.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id 144K1ukP046380; Tue, 4 May 2021 22:01:56 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fire.js.berklix.net (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 144K1kd1003733; Tue, 4 May 2021 22:01:56 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Message-Id: <202105042001.144K1kd1003733@fire.js.berklix.net> To: =?UTF-8?B?VMSzbA==?= Coosemans cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, "Julian H. Stacey" Subject: Re: /usr/ports/print/ghostscript9-agpl-base gs_ll3.ps: Error: /undefinedresource (fwd) From: "Julian H. Stacey" Organization: http://berklix.com/jhs/ User-agent: EXMH on FreeBSD http://berklix.com/free/ X-From: http://www.berklix.org/~jhs/ In-reply-to: Your message "Tue, 04 May 2021 17:51:05 +0200." <20210504175105.6e61b2d2@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 04 May 2021 22:01:46 +0200 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FZW2k2fqGz4Rg4 X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of jhs@berklix.com has no SPF policy when checking 94.185.90.68) smtp.mailfrom=jhs@berklix.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.56 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FREEFALL_USER(0.00)[jhs]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[berklix.com]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[94.185.90.68:from]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; HAS_ORG_HEADER(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[94.185.90.68:from:127.0.2.255]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.46)[-0.457]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:33824, ipnet:94.185.88.0/22, country:DE]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-ports] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 May 2021 20:02:08 -0000 Hi, Reference: > From: =?UTF-8?B?VMSzbA==?= Coosemans > Date: Tue, 4 May 2021 17:51:05 +0200 =?UTF-8?B?VMSzbA==?= Coosemans wrote: > On Tue, 04 May 2021 16:29:47 +0200 "Julian H. Stacey" > wrote: > > Hi ports@ people, > > I wrote this to doceng@FreeBSD.org Sun, 02 May 2021 23:43:44 +0200 > > but no reply by Tue May 4 16:26:48 CEST 2021. > > Have others seen similar or got ideas to fix gs ghostscript ? > > ----------- > > > > Hi doceng@FreeBSD.org > > as MAINTAINER= in /usr/ports/print/ghostscript9-agpl-base > > > > I'm stuck, gs fails to start, suggestions please ? > > > > FreeBSD lapr.js.berklix.net 12.2-STABLE FreeBSD 12.2-STABLE #1038: Mon Feb 15 02:04:28 CET 2021 jhs@lapr.no.berklix.net:/data/release/s2/usr/src/sys/amd64/compile/LAPR.small amd64 > > > > % printenv > > PATH=/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/games:/usr/local/bin > > TERM=xterm > > DESTDIR=/ > > TERMPATH=/etc/termcap:/usr/share/misc/termcap > > NOCLEANDEPENDS= > > % printenv > > PATH=/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/games:/usr/local/bin > > TERM=xterm > > DESTDIR=/ > > TERMPATH=/etc/termcap:/usr/share/misc/termcap > > NOCLEANDEPENDS= > > > > % which gs > > /usr/local/bin/gs > > % ls -l /usr/local/bin/gs > > - -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 7648 Apr 29 11:02 /usr/local/bin/gs* > > > > gs > > GPL Ghostscript 9.52 (2020-03-19) > > Copyright (C) 2020 Artifex Software, Inc. All rights reserved. > > This software is supplied under the GNU AGPLv3 and comes with NO WARRANTY: > > see the file COPYING for details. > > While reading gs_ll3.ps: > > Error: /undefinedresource in findresource > > Operand stack: > > (gs_icc.ps\000gs_mex_e.ps\000gs_mro_e.ps\000gs_pdf_e.ps\000gs_wan_e.ps\000pdf_ops.ps\000pdf_rbld.ps\000pdf_base.ps\000pdf_draw.ps\000gs_cff.ps\000gs_mgl_e.ps\000gs_ttf.ps\000pdf_font.ps\000pdf_main.ps\000pdf_sec.ps\000gs_epsf.ps\000gs_pdfwr.ps) (gs_ll3.ps) 1 Pscript5Idiom.pkgsave IdiomSet 6 Pscript5Idiom.pkgsave > > Execution stack: > > %interp_exit --nostringval-- findresource %loop_continue findresource findresource findresource false 1 %stopped_push --nostringval-- 1902 7 5 %oparray_pop findresource findresource --dict:16/18(ro)(G)-- --dict:2/2(G)-- findresource 2 %dict_continue findresource findresource 1900 5 5 %oparray_pop findresource %errorexec_pop findresource findresource findresource findresource > > Dictionary stack: > > --dict:943/1123(G)-- --dict:0/20(G)-- --dict:77/200(L)-- --dict:943/1123(G)-- --dict:38/43(G)-- --dict:16/18(ro)(G)-- > > Current allocation mode is global > > Current file position is 18941 > > > > Any ideas please ? > > I rebuilt my machine with make worl & generic then custom kernel & > > a load of downloaded pkg > > pkg info -a | wc -l > > 1348 > > > > ive since run > > cd /usr/ports/print/ghostscript9-agpl-base > > make clean > > make reinstall > > > > gs -help > > ends > > /usr/local/share/ghostscript/9.52/Resource/Init : > > /usr/local/share/ghostscript/9.52/lib : > > /usr/local/share/ghostscript/9.52/Resource/Font : > > /usr/local/share/ghostscript/fonts : /usr/local/share/fonts > > Ghostscript is also using fontconfig to search for font files > > > > my /usr/local/share/ghostscript/9.52/Resource/ has no Init should it ? > > drwxr-xr-x 2 root bin 4608 May 2 22:33 ./ > > drwxr-xr-x 11 root bin 512 May 2 22:33 ../ > > - -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 3297 May 2 22:23 FAPIcidfmap > > - -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 3297 Jun 16 2020 FAPIcidfmap.pkgsave > > - -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 1158 May 2 22:23 FAPIconfig > > - -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 1158 Jun 16 2020 FAPIconfig.pkgsave > > - -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 1468 May 2 22:23 FAPIfontmap > > - -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 1468 Jun 16 2020 FAPIfontmap.pkgsave > > - -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 2857 May 2 22:23 FCOfontmap-PCLPS2 > > - -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 2857 Jun 16 2020 FCOfontmap-PCLPS2.pkgsave > > - -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 109 May 2 22:23 Fontmap > > - -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 12929 May 2 22:23 Fontmap.GS > > - -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 12929 Jun 16 2020 Fontmap.GS.pkgsave > > - -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 109 Jun 16 2020 Fontmap.pkgsave > > - -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 4183 May 2 22:23 cidfmap > > - -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 4183 Jun 16 2020 cidfmap.pkgsave > > - -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 218021 May 2 22:23 gs_agl.ps > > > > /usr/local/share/ghostscript/fonts > > - -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 13643 Sep 19 2020 Fontmap > > - -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 13643 Jul 6 2019 Fontmap.pkgsave > > lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 49 Sep 19 2020 GothicBBB-Medium@ -> /usr/local/share/fonts/std.ja_JP/GothicBBB-Medium > > lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 53 Sep 19 2020 GothicBBB-Medium.gs7@ -> /usr/local/share/fonts/std.ja_JP/GothicBBB-Medium.gs7 > > lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 44 Sep 19 2020 MSung-Light@ -> /usr/local/share/fonts/std.zh_CN/MSung-Light > > lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 45 Sep 19 2020 Ryumin-Light@ -> /usr/local/share/fonts/std.ja_JP/Ryumin-Light > > lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 49 Sep 19 2020 Ryumin-Light.gs7@ -> /usr/local/share/fonts/std.ja_JP/Ryumin-Light.gs7 > > lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 48 Sep 19 2020 STHeiti-Regular@ -> /usr/local/share/fonts/std.zh_CN/STHeiti-Regular > > lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 45 Sep 19 2020 STSong-Light@ -> /usr/local/share/fonts/std.zh_CN/STSong-Light > > - -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 42833 Sep 19 2020 a010013l.afm > > > > - -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 19572 May 2 20:23 /usr/local/share/ghostscript/9.52/Resource/Init/gs_ll3.ps > > MD5 (share/ghostscript/9.52/Resource/Init/gs_ll3.ps) = 9c92e1f0a9fbde8aff39ab3d49e1e35b > > > > Could this be a font problem ? > > > > I used to see fontconfig errs with firefox, but that starts > > without error now, as does exmh so I guess its not fontfig. > > > > BTW I chased this problem back from this failing > > cat thing.ps | /usr/local/bin/ps2pdf -sPAPERSIZE=a4 - thing.pdf > > > > Hope you can help please, if I should provide more info please let me know. > > Delete all those .pkgsave files. These are backups created by pkg when > it has to install a file over an existing file. It means a previous > version of ghostscript wasn't deleted properly. Thanks Coosemans, I ran my compare+delete http://berklix.com/~jhs/src/bsd/jhs/bin/public/cmpd/cmpd.c cmpd -d -v \ /usr/local/share/ghostscript/fonts/Fontmap.pkgsave \ /usr/local/share/ghostscript/fonts/Fontmap cmpd -d -v \ /usr/local/share/ghostscript/9.52/Resource/Init/Fontmap.pkgsave \ /usr/local/share/ghostscript/9.52/Resource/Init/Fontmap cmpd -d -v \ /usr/local/share/ghostscript/9.52/Resource/Init/Fontmap.GS.pkgsave \ /usr/local/share/ghostscript/9.52/Resource/Init/Fontmap.GS All identical & deleted. & rebooted but no better, gs still fails. (also xsane fals since a pkg upgrade (after discovering the gs problem), xsane also stopped seeing a scanner which the same box with a few month old current still sees the scanner ) Unless someone else has an idea, I could try discarding the whole of /usr/local & reinstall all for a clean system, with: cd /usr/local/.. mv local local.old ; mkdir local cd /var/cache/pkg/.. mv pkg pkg.old ; mkdir pkg cd /var/db/pkg/.. ; mv pkg pkg/.old ; mkdir pkg cd /etc ; mv pkg pkg.old ; mkdir pkg Then reinstall all packages Though that's crude & laborious & may not fix it. Cheers, -- Julian Stacey http://berklix.com/jhs/ http://stolenvotes.uk UK for Brexit stole 750K votes from Brits in EU of 3.7M globaly. Zap BoJo Mogg. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue May 4 20:45:32 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E8E2622C1E for ; Tue, 4 May 2021 20:45:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nc@freebsd.org) Received: from rainpuddle.neelc.org (rainpuddle.neelc.org [66.42.69.219]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FZX0r0TDhz4VPM for ; Tue, 4 May 2021 20:45:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nc@freebsd.org) Received: from mail.neelc.org (rainpuddle.neelc.org [IPv6:2001:19f0:8001:fed:5400:2ff:fe73:c622]) by rainpuddle.neelc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EE4C6EB2A5 for ; Tue, 4 May 2021 13:45:29 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 04 May 2021 13:45:29 -0700 From: Neel Chauhan To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Maintainer timeout on textproc/py-markdown update on Bugzilla - safe to commit? User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.4.11 Message-ID: <67ab40e3dd436ad8fcb2fd1867ac0065@freebsd.org> X-Sender: nc@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FZX0r0TDhz4VPM X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.00 / 15.00]; local_wl_from(0.00)[freebsd.org]; ASN(0.00)[asn:20473, ipnet:66.42.64.0/20, country:US] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 May 2021 20:45:32 -0000 Hi, There is an update to the port textproc/py-markdown but the maintainer, koobs@ has not responded even when (I believe) it could be committed. Bugzilla PR: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239070 Assuming no dependent ports have an issue with this update, would it be safe to commit this with a maintainer timeout if koobs@ hasn't responded? I'm asking since I don't want to prematurely commit ports. This port needs to be updated in order to import GTK+ 4 which in turn needs to update x11-toolkits/pango (which in turn needs this update). -Neel (nc@) From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue May 4 20:47:18 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF5136229D8 for ; Tue, 4 May 2021 20:47:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tijl@freebsd.org) Received: from mailrelay203.isp.belgacom.be (mailrelay203.isp.belgacom.be [195.238.22.130]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "relay.skynet.be", Issuer "GlobalSign RSA OV SSL CA 2018" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FZX2t1Qn2z4V6v for ; Tue, 4 May 2021 20:47:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tijl@freebsd.org) IronPort-SDR: UMYznE7jpCgrJoh0n0QQSqe4wKVJiq+kPE8mstxKjfsSmQArF9QS8rPv744dpnI9joyiljyL27 L/hVd+vM+Vg0AfU06H9clUQntPDC5YZ63MLZOYEF7HeFa4bW+R+4Nzb/4JSMjyM8n2z1qVULJR sO7xHKN14ln29MV9KG8wzz/YVW8pKeFrzYW6wyaRas8+fcg9m9LythpM9Pg47OOKAtyuR87JbW 6zGNPpTEy4o2Q/MLGFHaDcEltpgGXLscMSel2kBH+9CVcBZyaxwfBb6cp1pPqdR+0+9yY9llBU ysA= X-IPAS-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A2AFAwAwspFg/wSs8lFaFgYBAQEBAQEHAQESAQEEBAEBQ?= =?us-ascii?q?AmBToMNFVYBao1IhlSCITgBin6KDoc3CwEBAQEBAQEBATEMBAEBhFACgXwmO?= =?us-ascii?q?BMCBAEBAQMCAwEBAQEBBgEBAQEBAQUEAYEDhRcMCCUNgjgig2sBBTo/EAsYL?= =?us-ascii?q?lcGE4JygwsLqWSBNIEBhGGDdIEJgTqNYEOCC4Q3PoJJFwSHVgSDQhMBKoEZn?= =?us-ascii?q?iyBKp0ZgkZUiXmTJTeFFY80kFotoQOZdYF8TTAIgyQJRxkOjC2BfhYVgzmCC?= =?us-ascii?q?ohVPwMvOAIGCgEBAwmMMl0BAQ?= IronPort-PHdr: A9a23:oApOIhUXoQ4JqpKGLPCGCtS0rrXV8KwdVTF92vIco4ILSbyq+tHYB Gea288FpGHAUYiT0f9Yke2e6/mmBTVRp8za7jtbLMcEfiRGoP1epxYnDs+BBB+zB9/RRAt+I v5/UkR49WqwK0lfFZW2TVTTpnqv8WxaQU2nZkJ6KevvB4Hdkdm82fys9J3PeQVIgye2ba9vI Bmsogjdq80bjZF8Jqs/yxbFrWZEdutYyGh1OV+dghHw69uq8pV+6SpQofUh98BBUaX+Yas1S KFTASolPW4o+sDlrAHPQgST6HQSVGUWiQdIDBPe7B7mRJfxszD1ufR71SKHIMD5V7E0WTCl7 6d2VB/ljToMOjAl/G3LjMF7kaRWqw+jqRNi2Y7ZeI+bOvpgcK3Aft0VR2RBUclNWCJOGY68c 4kCAvAdMepEs4XxuV0Dpga+Cwm2A+PvzydFiGHz360+zu8sDwbG3As7H90QtXTbttP1NLwPW u2y0KnIzDfDb/dN1Dn98ojHbA4urOyRU7x+a8bRzlMvFwzcg1iWtIfqMC+b2P4XvGiH8+pvS /ivi2g/pg1vvjShxtkhhpfJi48Xy13J6SZ0zYI1KNC3SkN2YtGpHZhMui+UK4Z4TccvTmV1t Cg1ybAIuZ22cScUxZkjxhPSbeGMfYaP4hLmTumRIDF4iWp+d72hnRay8kygyuzzV8WuzFlKq S9Fn9/RvX4Ozxze8suKRuZn8ku/1juDyRrf5vxGLEwqj6bWJJgsyaMqmJUJq0TMBCr2lV3zj K+Ra0or5PCl6//iYrX6vp+cMJJ0ih3mPqQuhMO/BeM4PxANX2eB/eS81bjj8lPjQLVNlPE2j qjZsJLeJcgBuqG5BAhV0p095Ba6FTim1s8YkWMALFJfdxKLl4npO1fQL/DkFfqygEmgnC11y /3JILHtGIjBI3rdnLv7crtx80tcxxAyzdBb6ZJUELYBIPfrV0/ttdzYDBs5Phe6w+b9Ftpyy JgRWXmSDaODN6PSq1CI6vo1I+aQfI8VpCr9K/896v7gl382h0EScrKy3ZQKcXy4BvNmI1+FY Xr3mdoBH30KsRQgQ+Pxk12NTCRfZ3GoX6IztXkHD9fsL5rHR4mryJzHlBynF5ZbdyoOXlKMC l/iep+HX/YcLimVJ5kyvCYDUO2drItp/haprwL/wrx8Zr7I+y8cnbz52dVf3MGVkgs9o28nR /+B2n2AGjkn1lgDQCU7ifgXnA== IronPort-HdrOrdr: A9a23:tsqEWKyeMpyO04RhD3hoKrPwzr1zdoIgy1knxilNYDZeG/b2q+ mFmvMH2RjozAsLUHY7ltyafIWGS3XQ9Zl6iLNhWYuKdg/gpWeuMcVe/ZLvqgeQfhHW2+ZB2c 5bGZRWJ8b3CTFB4PrSwA79KNo4xcnCzabAv4fj5lNMaS0vVK169Qd+DW+gYy9LbS1LH4AwGp bZxucvnVudUE8aZMi6GXUJNtKrz7b2vanrbhIcCxks5BPmt0LK1JfBDxOa0h0COgkg/Z4e9w H+/zDE2g== X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true Received: from 4.172-242-81.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be (HELO kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org) ([81.242.172.4]) by relay.proximus.be with ESMTP; 04 May 2021 22:47:15 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTP id 144KlELs013973; Tue, 4 May 2021 22:47:14 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from tijl@FreeBSD.org) Date: Tue, 4 May 2021 22:47:13 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?VMSzbA==?= Coosemans To: "Julian H. Stacey" Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: /usr/ports/print/ghostscript9-agpl-base gs_ll3.ps: Error: /undefinedresource (fwd) Message-ID: <20210504224713.163bbe6a@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <202105042001.144K1kd1003733@fire.js.berklix.net> References: <20210504175105.6e61b2d2@FreeBSD.org> <202105042001.144K1kd1003733@fire.js.berklix.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FZX2t1Qn2z4V6v X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.00 / 15.00]; local_wl_from(0.00)[freebsd.org]; ASN(0.00)[asn:5432, ipnet:195.238.0.0/19, country:BE] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 May 2021 20:47:18 -0000 On Tue, 04 May 2021 22:01:46 +0200 "Julian H. Stacey" wrote: >> Delete all those .pkgsave files. These are backups created by pkg when >> it has to install a file over an existing file. It means a previous >> version of ghostscript wasn't deleted properly. > > Thanks Coosemans, I ran my compare+delete > http://berklix.com/~jhs/src/bsd/jhs/bin/public/cmpd/cmpd.c > cmpd -d -v \ > /usr/local/share/ghostscript/fonts/Fontmap.pkgsave \ > /usr/local/share/ghostscript/fonts/Fontmap > cmpd -d -v \ > /usr/local/share/ghostscript/9.52/Resource/Init/Fontmap.pkgsave \ > /usr/local/share/ghostscript/9.52/Resource/Init/Fontmap > cmpd -d -v \ > /usr/local/share/ghostscript/9.52/Resource/Init/Fontmap.GS.pkgsave \ > /usr/local/share/ghostscript/9.52/Resource/Init/Fontmap.GS > All identical & deleted. > > & rebooted but no better, gs still fails. In your original message there were more than these 3. Did you delete all of them? Try "find /usr/local/share/ghostscript -name '*.pkgsave'". From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue May 4 20:47:49 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B930A622AF4 for ; Tue, 4 May 2021 20:47:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@grem.de) Received: from mail.evolve.de (mail.evolve.de [213.239.217.29]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA512 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mail.evolve.de", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FZX3S2gtKz4V38; Tue, 4 May 2021 20:47:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@grem.de) Received: by mail.evolve.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 853fef62; Tue, 4 May 2021 20:47:38 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=grem.de; h=content-type :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to :date:cc:message-id:references:to; s=20180501; bh=YOAgUO/dngTqWD tSTRXky5dvcF8=; b=dqs7J+HQO8SDqTX28Ien/V7VCjnQr6kIxERRv44BhFtBbd kNmwapMJAUK8omYSRov5vSHhUFv7C2gUvmzFizh3y3LSWHTYgxm0tE7Do7RIDj+e jXkG3btEKywqRcvy4+EmEqtp/D/wvN8fDvQI1CdXZhGA1XYyaAqSoWv6iD8r324+ sCR44ffi4D7HUG31PLDpNQGz7/Qm6WLiWEm6m2LdTXDwkmb+ptVj8zabX9SWK3lC 4c/K0NIljsrEM4r/35pJTX3NPCJeB2TosuqftlkFbSciZeB0VCbz2gz8CNl2Bc23 gmh2HSZmQ533Y0QRuPcLuDiApHOkrtcBmLIJx7qg== DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=grem.de; h=content-type :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to :date:cc:message-id:references:to; q=dns; s=20180501; b=VCCn1ccf KqtfbLtwwoM6sjDgnyywBSlUJxNJ79TWD/t9vd8BZPn89l5t2yuhDiE2jZWl/DWD dvUFVhETdgabpLufVHAaAOX7MVTMH8vrgcghmHAhEqWF01Y8Zv7DmtcKtmhMPKqs 3HVxPePbmnRFPtlxgJADjuGpYJWHDkfa/c5z244UGcgMDdAaVSHO2igIaD/91Cp7 epqMSqxfnax2WcLkI1XLDL5u1+dEDK2eTljcIfV4NTxkFM5t3QvsWxCk6TRhKAub IIDFoPTsfbn1/RUJMAb6N8otctALfPx6wjJVAjZ6vjimFCg2DbftufPfX2gT/5S1 d/tnXRn67Effog== Received: by mail.evolve.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id b90649c5 (TLSv1.3:AEAD-CHACHA20-POLY1305-SHA256:256:NO); Tue, 4 May 2021 20:47:36 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Subject: Re: Maintainer timeout on textproc/py-markdown update on Bugzilla - safe to commit? From: Michael Gmelin In-Reply-To: <67ab40e3dd436ad8fcb2fd1867ac0065@freebsd.org> Date: Tue, 4 May 2021 22:47:34 +0200 Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Kubilay Kocak Message-Id: <3237E5F0-DA2C-4B07-AB7B-4729EA55AD4F@grem.de> References: <67ab40e3dd436ad8fcb2fd1867ac0065@freebsd.org> To: Neel Chauhan X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (18E212) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FZX3S2gtKz4V38 X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=grem.de header.s=20180501 header.b=dqs7J+HQ; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of freebsd@grem.de designates 213.239.217.29 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=freebsd@grem.de X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.00 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[213.239.217.29:from]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[grem.de:s=20180501]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:213.239.217.29/32]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[grem.de]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[213.239.217.29:from:127.0.2.255]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[grem.de:+]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:213.239.192.0/18, country:DE]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-ports] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 May 2021 20:47:49 -0000 > On 4. May 2021, at 22:45, Neel Chauhan wrote: >=20 > =EF=BB=BFHi, >=20 > There is an update to the port textproc/py-markdown but the maintainer, ko= obs@ has not responded even when (I believe) it could be committed. >=20 > Bugzilla PR: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D239070 >=20 > Assuming no dependent ports have an issue with this update, would it be sa= fe to commit this with a maintainer timeout if koobs@ hasn't responded? >=20 > I'm asking since I don't want to prematurely commit ports. >=20 > This port needs to be updated in order to import GTK+ 4 which in turn need= s to update x11-toolkits/pango (which in turn needs this update). >=20 Cc Koobs - looking at the pr, it seems like it was complicated and a lot of o= ther work had to be done first. -m > -Neel (nc@) > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue May 4 21:05:11 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAB2562356D for ; Tue, 4 May 2021 21:05:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@grem.de) Received: from mail.evolve.de (mail.evolve.de [213.239.217.29]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA512 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mail.evolve.de", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FZXRV6qxDz4Vk6; Tue, 4 May 2021 21:05:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@grem.de) Received: by mail.evolve.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id b61d0ad6; Tue, 4 May 2021 21:05:07 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=grem.de; h=content-type :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to :date:cc:message-id:references:to; s=20180501; bh=iWPBaJU+6N3jaH aZ7CS8FfP0KXE=; b=E0tZP3wgvDAclxqgBKT0uyfMVEEnajBG/+zMJVbLj0zbIl FSYjAgm6a9yyqIHcUVtEMjFyI96xBpNHhH4oq5sdH6ptdJ8b9fuxKlsjBQeS8BfL VemmPpT8qkglmE89ae86Is9lDYP62PgMfnaZoSsLxyxli/1ri4A1kr0mFFVXIlev G6fP4IkaaaAhxl3wN/SmtBsz5TaPCqWJHJXuwOkzNGTImKNNDrHMAdZYtRHWpInc /+gYpYtD1jVvs06tZpiOr+qwaovrdtXuez7VUakZMfTGIdrGmEdRBvfzP66e/XJT 2PunbidPx9KuzaMZYk91zqZ5YoqIY5BpXDWQXiUg== DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=grem.de; h=content-type :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to :date:cc:message-id:references:to; q=dns; s=20180501; b=dQgGbTTq I+i62ant26ccVe6hQmGAsLS3vnnAFcZdbmPlrxUxa/yt0iZ7iUdYrsLq4Z9WV5BU r2nDMJTQ0nif23Dn/x8j75hhbHtMG3Gy+Io/6aNydcqEt4jHKRWjwBKDcUSoLU6x +X69oEK10dF4UMDKQ83BQ5Hm3IUJXIZFQDgV7WB+RfXBDtp6XCFibyoS5LVo2qMg 86aF2S/FiVdTNnUelVNpUVqkQOtQLlsBJOkfWE/AydzEE4PGanJkX42Y9pnqVFkn Ndmlt1Y8bZliz7o4YgXFLo2msO2e5J61EGGONYLg/a+YjNdp3Lkp4y3q3/flzH7P i0U7LYiW2n4z3g== Received: by mail.evolve.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 8f59de49 (TLSv1.3:AEAD-CHACHA20-POLY1305-SHA256:256:NO); Tue, 4 May 2021 21:05:07 +0000 (UTC) Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Subject: Re: Making a port to use OpenSSL of ports collection on FreeBSD 11.x From: Michael Gmelin In-Reply-To: <20210505.044904.213100914297809480.yasu@utahime.org> Date: Tue, 4 May 2021 23:05:06 +0200 Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-Id: <8151EFB0-635D-4648-AF0B-653E45584F1A@grem.de> References: <20210505.044904.213100914297809480.yasu@utahime.org> To: Yasuhiro Kimura X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (18E212) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FZXRV6qxDz4Vk6 X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=grem.de header.s=20180501 header.b=E0tZP3wg; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of freebsd@grem.de designates 213.239.217.29 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=freebsd@grem.de X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.00 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[grem.de:s=20180501]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:213.239.217.29/32]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[grem.de]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[213.239.217.29:from:127.0.2.255]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[grem.de:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.999]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[213.239.217.29:from]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:213.239.192.0/18, country:DE]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-ports]; FORGED_RECIPIENTS(2.00)[m:yasu@utahime.org,s:grembo@freebsd.org] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.34 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 May 2021 21:05:11 -0000 > On 4. May 2021, at 21:50, Yasuhiro Kimura wrote: >=20 > =EF=BB=BFHello, >=20 > Of the currently supported FreeBSD versions, base system of FreeBSD > 11.x uses OpenSSL 1.0.2 and that of FreeBSD 12.x or later use OpenSSL > 1.1.1. >=20 > Then when new version of an application dropped suport of OpenSSL > 1.0.2, is there any way to make the port of it to use OpenSSL of ports > collection if the system is FreeBSD 11.x? >=20 See https://docs.freebsd.org/en/books/porters-handbook/uses/#uses-ssl Best > Best Regards. >=20 > --- > Yasuhiro Kimura > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue May 4 22:26:18 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE8B2625A28 for ; Tue, 4 May 2021 22:26:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from slim.berklix.org (slim.berklix.org [94.185.90.68]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "slim.berklix.org", Issuer "slim.berklix.org" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FZZF52wWBz4ZZT; Tue, 4 May 2021 22:26:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from mart.js.berklix.net (p4fc4c0dd.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [79.196.192.221]) (authenticated bits=128) by slim.berklix.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id 144MQ5rT082899 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 5 May 2021 00:26:09 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (fire.js.berklix.net [192.168.91.41]) by mart.js.berklix.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id 144MQ4CV046957; Wed, 5 May 2021 00:26:04 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fire.js.berklix.net (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 144MPnc9067053; Wed, 5 May 2021 00:25:59 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Message-Id: <202105042225.144MPnc9067053@fire.js.berklix.net> To: =?UTF-8?B?VMSzbA==?= Coosemans cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Gary Jennejohn Subject: Re: /usr/ports/print/ghostscript9-agpl-base gs_ll3.ps: Error: /undefinedresource (fwd) From: "Julian H. Stacey" Organization: http://berklix.com/jhs/ User-agent: EXMH on FreeBSD http://berklix.com/free/ X-From: http://www.berklix.org/~jhs/ In-reply-to: Your message "Tue, 04 May 2021 22:47:13 +0200." <20210504224713.163bbe6a@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 05 May 2021 00:25:49 +0200 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FZZF52wWBz4ZZT X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of jhs@berklix.com has no SPF policy when checking 94.185.90.68) smtp.mailfrom=jhs@berklix.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.73 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; HAS_ORG_HEADER(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.90)[-0.897]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:33824, ipnet:94.185.88.0/22, country:DE]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[94.185.90.68:from]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[79.196.192.221:received]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.73)[-0.730]; FREEFALL_USER(0.00)[jhs]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[berklix.com]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[94.185.90.68:from:127.0.2.255]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; FREEMAIL_CC(0.00)[freebsd.org,gmail.com]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-ports] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 May 2021 22:26:18 -0000 Hi, Reference: > From: =?UTF-8?B?VMSzbA==?= Coosemans > Date: Tue, 4 May 2021 22:47:13 +0200 =?UTF-8?B?VMSzbA==?= Coosemans wrote: > On Tue, 04 May 2021 22:01:46 +0200 "Julian H. Stacey" > wrote: > >> Delete all those .pkgsave files. These are backups created by pkg when > >> it has to install a file over an existing file. It means a previous > >> version of ghostscript wasn't deleted properly. > > > > Thanks Coosemans, I ran my compare+delete > > http://berklix.com/~jhs/src/bsd/jhs/bin/public/cmpd/cmpd.c > > cmpd -d -v \ > > /usr/local/share/ghostscript/fonts/Fontmap.pkgsave \ > > /usr/local/share/ghostscript/fonts/Fontmap > > cmpd -d -v \ > > /usr/local/share/ghostscript/9.52/Resource/Init/Fontmap.pkgsave \ > > /usr/local/share/ghostscript/9.52/Resource/Init/Fontmap > > cmpd -d -v \ > > /usr/local/share/ghostscript/9.52/Resource/Init/Fontmap.GS.pkgsave \ > > /usr/local/share/ghostscript/9.52/Resource/Init/Fontmap.GS > > All identical & deleted. > > > > & rebooted but no better, gs still fails. > > In your original message there were more than these 3. Did you delete > all of them? Try "find /usr/local/share/ghostscript -name '*.pkgsave'". Oops tons of them, so I did this: cd /usr/local find . -name \*\.pkgsave\* | wc -l # 321798 find . -name \*\.pkgsave\* | xargs rm # A few with spaces in names find . -name \*\.pkgsave\* -exec rm {} \; find . -name \*\.pkgsave\* -print reboot Fixed it ! gs works now, brings up a panel inside X11 :-) Thanks Coosemans !! I've also purged all pkgsave on all other bootable partitions on this host & another. There's no cron driven warning of pollution available from /usr/src /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/pkg/ work/pkg-1.16.3/NEWS work/pkg-1.16.3/libpkg/pkg_add.c work/pkg-1.16.3/tests/frontend/configmerge.sh work/pkg-1.16.3/tests/frontend/conflicts.sh pkg-check would seem a plausible name to include a find of .pkgsave ? Cheers, -- Julian Stacey http://berklix.com/jhs/ http://stolenvotes.uk UK for Brexit stole 750K votes from Brits in EU of 3.7M globaly. Zap BoJo Mogg. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed May 5 02:52:51 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFA5562D358 for ; Wed, 5 May 2021 02:52:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from koobs.freebsd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pg1-x536.google.com (mail-pg1-x536.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::536]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FZh8f5vqcz4mj1; Wed, 5 May 2021 02:52:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from koobs.freebsd@gmail.com) Received: by mail-pg1-x536.google.com with SMTP id c21so813873pgg.3; Tue, 04 May 2021 19:52:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:reply-to:subject :content-language:to:cc:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=0V/oQhc2M6jnpruCfmzi+g/NsUN+2JefzHEZqNzxA7c=; b=j8UzzLaXBMrC3Dr/bkIopShsjvjQ21YuYRRwpf1HmMqHXWid6vCe30+QOQv7S+b7+K ldPtZomTDSaCvMWsSlwG4YvSUeJ3dYFu76QBRwY6d1Bvfqglz6zJ59LcYZ2Hr9Oe4l5p SST+HSqqbj0z7SSh644SpG0CHD0G2E+hkk3wyFzO5HvjgKa37H0EFHVntEn+ttBC2vpe nW8r2nqt1vLikH0OtGHs4DphB4PgP9/+6DFfEQFrfdxUsy/3vsqN5yN3RLiLGmet6pAq iCYMnsmrdSSVB6E50PnzfHC2Je513LYveukX8OYHUIFJ0A93gg0NapK+7cgw+7jYk+OQ 8VtA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent :reply-to:subject:content-language:to:cc:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=0V/oQhc2M6jnpruCfmzi+g/NsUN+2JefzHEZqNzxA7c=; b=LaHbuDIALxTq75VS3/GTqx4GPwVn1uP/ymSMM+G9kdAYHiZszwh2goLLfqvc8ER9DB w0TyaQqtkEOnEyMmh9KIic2RfnLTRVMXDJYdJPBvubu3dZvNh+gOubU7w6MZJoTnGiby 1XnxwrqgmraJE6V+zvvXohbbh/c4iCQot4imTQFNl3Upffdku5QteXcb8xcXHaJLfgz0 wYm03f9Om+rJNyLlxw1K3SaM6klk0vSNdYIU8clmTzuj2/9AySfmUAJPt/EE56DluJD1 ehVFgXURtyloVsFJWN9ANUutnif2cArWMfbB4KszUV8xm4HGJrwkRZeGxPZxD70XxO5f ag3Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5318JX5LDS8bb0IHJOjKoGgxTh2Msc9H+SAkvtvMCA3n/R0UHfda 2ucYKhCCFMfdxlClq3YPYfC06shJnFGKiQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzumSXniZQ44RL14bMqN8J7S3UNlDSD0XgyvkZULBRegY7S85aptgvSobBA8kSNW+M830OU8Q== X-Received: by 2002:a63:1352:: with SMTP id 18mr25386348pgt.11.1620183168804; Tue, 04 May 2021 19:52:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.104] (167-179-159-58.a7b39f.syd.nbn.aussiebb.net. [167.179.159.58]) by smtp.gmail.com with UTF8SMTPSA id 3sm13237812pff.132.2021.05.04.19.52.46 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 04 May 2021 19:52:48 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Kubilay Kocak Message-ID: Date: Wed, 5 May 2021 12:52:44 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:90.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/90.0a1 Reply-To: koobs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Maintainer timeout on textproc/py-markdown update on Bugzilla - safe to commit? Content-Language: en-US To: Michael Gmelin , Neel Chauhan Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <67ab40e3dd436ad8fcb2fd1867ac0065@freebsd.org> <3237E5F0-DA2C-4B07-AB7B-4729EA55AD4F@grem.de> From: Kubilay Kocak In-Reply-To: <3237E5F0-DA2C-4B07-AB7B-4729EA55AD4F@grem.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FZh8f5vqcz4mj1 X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=j8UzzLaX; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of koobsfreebsd@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::536 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=koobsfreebsd@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.90 / 15.00]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[koobs@FreeBSD.org]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36]; REPLYTO_ADDR_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.71)[-0.707]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[koobs@FreeBSD.org,koobsfreebsd@gmail.com]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::536:from]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[koobs@FreeBSD.org,koobsfreebsd@gmail.com]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.998]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[FreeBSD.org]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::536:from:127.0.2.255]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::536:from]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-ports] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 May 2021 02:52:51 -0000 On 5/05/2021 6:47 am, Michael Gmelin wrote: > > >> On 4. May 2021, at 22:45, Neel Chauhan wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> There is an update to the port textproc/py-markdown but the maintainer, koobs@ has not responded even when (I believe) it could be committed. >> >> Bugzilla PR: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239070 >> >> Assuming no dependent ports have an issue with this update, would it be safe to commit this with a maintainer timeout if koobs@ hasn't responded? >> >> I'm asking since I don't want to prematurely commit ports. >> >> This port needs to be updated in order to import GTK+ 4 which in turn needs to update x11-toolkits/pango (which in turn needs this update). >> > > Cc Koobs - looking at the pr, it seems like it was complicated and a lot of other work had to be done first. > > -m > > There's no problem bumping issues and for me at least, I'm usually very clear on explicitly mentioning what needs to happen (even in my absence) for something to land so anyone can do that. I will always approve and unblock well-tested change proposals. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed May 5 11:44:36 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 758B163B830 for ; Wed, 5 May 2021 11:44:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from SRS0=llPl=KA=klop.ws=ronald-lists@realworks.nl) Received: from smtp-relay-int.realworks.nl (smtp-relay-int.realworks.nl [194.109.157.24]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FZvyC399Fz3mF3 for ; Wed, 5 May 2021 11:44:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from SRS0=llPl=KA=klop.ws=ronald-lists@realworks.nl) Date: Wed, 5 May 2021 13:44:32 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=klop.ws; s=rw2; t=1620215073; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type; bh=pO7F06MhHkYnXvRL4IZgVFRPMh4Ret6O3Ku9HZQYf9U=; b=hmg8E6ouPAKvdgSFiHirt3u3aUBs7ipc0/QZRul2+Q25946JtzPZi3Q7wqduH0YLiSXEiw 2qtctjBf++nNHWScON0hsOk8Srm9ZczbmECRITliJD2/AikCQ9Ph0Iu1FQniRLGf2rOm7y sWRTBQTEdHeRaCHC5z04hXx6A4fAI/cYavbAK20doW2HeuRHblWa+TyjqnkZm8UcVtQdgX j5IQ2PWTJF2Zhzv54bN7PlGMvht3iWPuvxlu83/OtGCCWdHco3de2dVQludY5cbYG6z7P/ 7KG2PHOr3DvZBfh9ZbNbg3u/Oqju8Lyc/te2p4fD1KS+fxA+GXCdr5PwmeMn2w== From: Ronald Klop To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <536875864.114.1620215072820@localhost> Subject: looking for committer MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Realworks (558.66.eb5d44539cb) Importance: Normal X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FZvyC399Fz3mF3 X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=klop.ws header.s=rw2 header.b=hmg8E6ou; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=klop.ws; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of SRS0=llPl=KA=klop.ws=ronald-lists@realworks.nl designates 194.109.157.24 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=SRS0=llPl=KA=klop.ws=ronald-lists@realworks.nl X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.15 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_VERYGOOD(0.00)[194.109.157.24:from]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[klop.ws:s=rw2]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:194.109.157.0/24]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.95)[-0.948]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[klop.ws:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[klop.ws,none]; HAS_X_PRIO_THREE(0.00)[3]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[194.109.157.24:from]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[ronald-lists@klop.ws,SRS0=llPl=KA=klop.ws=ronald-lists@realworks.nl]; RCVD_COUNT_ZERO(0.00)[0]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:3265, ipnet:194.109.0.0/16, country:NL]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[ronald-lists@klop.ws,SRS0=llPl=KA=klop.ws=ronald-lists@realworks.nl]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-ports] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.34 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 May 2021 11:44:36 -0000 Hi, I'm looking for a committer for the following port issues. https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=255118 (mongodb40, maintainer gave +feedback instead of +approval) https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=255117 (monbodb40-tools, maintainer gave +feedback instead of +approval) https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=255255 (grafana7 depends on ca_root_nss, maintainer did not react for 2 weeks) Thanks in advance. Regards, Ronald. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed May 5 12:10:46 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 676A263CC44 for ; Wed, 5 May 2021 12:10:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FZwXQ2Qx5z3nfx for ; Wed, 5 May 2021 12:10:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 5365C63CC43; Wed, 5 May 2021 12:10:46 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5330063CE0F for ; Wed, 5 May 2021 12:10:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FZwXQ1ywNz3nfw for ; Wed, 5 May 2021 12:10:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (portscout.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 36A9F24AA3 for ; Wed, 5 May 2021 12:10:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.nyi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.10]) by portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 145CAkKx004051 for ; Wed, 5 May 2021 12:10:46 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 145CAkMN004041; Wed, 5 May 2021 12:10:46 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <202105051210.145CAkMN004041@portscout.nyi.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.nyi.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 5 May 2021 12:10:46 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 May 2021 12:10:46 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ lang/clojure-mode.el | 5.11.0 | 5.13.0 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Reported by: portscout! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed May 5 14:23:47 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0904F5F870C for ; Wed, 5 May 2021 14:23:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yasu@utahime.org) Received: from maybe.home.utahime.org (gate.home.utahime.org [183.180.29.210]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FZzTs5gN0z3vV0 for ; Wed, 5 May 2021 14:23:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yasu@utahime.org) Received: from eastasia.home.utahime.org (eastasia.home.utahime.org [192.168.174.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-384) server-digest SHA384) (No client certificate requested) by maybe.home.utahime.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B309BA1F9 for ; Wed, 5 May 2021 23:23:37 +0900 (JST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=utahime.org; s=maybe2019112701; t=1620224617; bh=ln9w1pBstqQg8iD1DrMf/2pZPboK4CrvuLPyZcYx4Ys=; h=Date:To:Subject:From:In-Reply-To:References; b=w7fDxacDrsiNJGwzA7F5Gnovch/iyxYZMtYG6yU5QkSaFrdIAUI9az3qdp9X9rrqr 2pzImWxhD6SNGpnvWqUm81FtFGI6J4qurGWG+C2s5m7mrZ8r4gFPPBrYjIlNjXkUC2 u+dTU6P6EL8wI8N4toX2YMUnY4VOLMmf1RoPngRjo/QRzfAUh7qLVBoMFbGJXAWhML 0o4wLZJI3+W3pO79XzVgBI6lMlI8QuxTB9aN4wd0WKIGT5W3iQnovrYk/psavWaj32 6syq2c2ls2KK2n0xqfnTyt0h6PvZwqeE4PSh2QukHEpx+PaFrJrV2IFm/Bij5XwJd3 YwYuFuYUXE/DA== Received: from localhost (rolling.home.utahime.org [192.168.174.11]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-384) server-digest SHA384) (No client certificate requested) by eastasia.home.utahime.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6BD18262CD; Wed, 5 May 2021 23:23:35 +0900 (JST) X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.103.2 at eastasia.home.utahime.org Date: Wed, 05 May 2021 23:22:08 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20210505.232208.1752175478734160028.yasu@utahime.org> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Making a port to use OpenSSL of ports collection on FreeBSD 11.x From: Yasuhiro Kimura In-Reply-To: <8151EFB0-635D-4648-AF0B-653E45584F1A@grem.de> References: <20210505.044904.213100914297809480.yasu@utahime.org> <8151EFB0-635D-4648-AF0B-653E45584F1A@grem.de> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.8 on Emacs 27.2 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FZzTs5gN0z3vV0 X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=utahime.org header.s=maybe2019112701 header.b=w7fDxacD; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of yasu@utahime.org designates 183.180.29.210 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=yasu@utahime.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.68 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+a:spf-authorized.utahime.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; HFILTER_HELO_IP_A(1.00)[maybe.home.utahime.org]; HFILTER_HELO_NORES_A_OR_MX(0.30)[maybe.home.utahime.org]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[utahime.org:+]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.98)[-0.983]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[183.180.29.210:from]; ASN(0.00)[asn:2519, ipnet:183.180.0.0/16, country:JP]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[utahime.org:s=maybe2019112701]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[utahime.org]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[183.180.29.210:from:127.0.2.255]; MID_CONTAINS_FROM(1.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-ports] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 May 2021 14:23:47 -0000 From: Michael Gmelin Subject: Re: Making a port to use OpenSSL of ports collection on FreeBSD 11.x Date: Tue, 4 May 2021 23:05:06 +0200 > See https://docs.freebsd.org/en/books/porters-handbook/uses/#uses-ssl > > Best I checked it but couldn't find proper solution. I think what is necessary in my case is something like version-spec argument of 'USES=python'. For example, if 'USES=python:3.8+' is specified in Makefile of a port, lang/python38 is used for it even if user sets 'DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=python=3.7' in /etc/make.conf. But 'USES=ssl' doesn't provide such argument. --- Yasuhiro Kimura From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed May 5 15:02:58 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39BEF5F9EB3 for ; Wed, 5 May 2021 15:02:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portmaster@bsdforge.com) Received: from udns.ultimatedns.net (static-24-113-41-81.wavecable.com [24.113.41.81]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "ultimatedns.net", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Fb0M54cF9z4RnN for ; Wed, 5 May 2021 15:02:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portmaster@bsdforge.com) Received: from ultimatedns.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by udns.ultimatedns.net (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTP id 145F302O079541; Wed, 5 May 2021 08:03:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from portmaster@bsdforge.com) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 05 May 2021 08:03:00 -0700 From: Chris To: Yasuhiro Kimura Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Making a port to use OpenSSL of ports collection on FreeBSD 11.x In-Reply-To: <20210505.232208.1752175478734160028.yasu@utahime.org> References: <20210505.044904.213100914297809480.yasu@utahime.org> <8151EFB0-635D-4648-AF0B-653E45584F1A@grem.de> <20210505.232208.1752175478734160028.yasu@utahime.org> User-Agent: UDNSMS/17.0 Message-ID: X-Sender: portmaster@bsdforge.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Fb0M54cF9z4RnN X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.00 / 15.00]; ASN(0.00)[asn:11404, ipnet:24.113.0.0/16, country:US]; local_wl_ip(0.00)[24.113.41.81] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 May 2021 15:02:58 -0000 On 2021-05-05 07:22, Yasuhiro Kimura wrote: > From: Michael Gmelin > Subject: Re: Making a port to use OpenSSL of ports collection on FreeBSD > 11.x > Date: Tue, 4 May 2021 23:05:06 +0200 > >> See https://docs.freebsd.org/en/books/porters-handbook/uses/#uses-ssl >> >> Best > > I checked it but couldn't find proper solution. > > I think what is necessary in my case is something like version-spec > argument of 'USES=python'. > > For example, if 'USES=python:3.8+' is specified in Makefile of a port, > lang/python38 is used for it even if user sets > 'DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=python=3.7' in /etc/make.conf. > > But 'USES=ssl' doesn't provide such argument. I ran into a similar situation requiring freebsd 11 users not use SSL from base, and I simply used a conditional based against freebsd version, that also included a RUN_DEPENDS on security/openssl Wouldn't that work in your case? --Chris > > --- > Yasuhiro Kimura > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed May 5 15:32:13 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45B715FA834 for ; Wed, 5 May 2021 15:32:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@grem.de) Received: from mail.evolve.de (mail.evolve.de [213.239.217.29]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA512 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mail.evolve.de", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Fb10r13XZz4Svw for ; Wed, 5 May 2021 15:32:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@grem.de) Received: by mail.evolve.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 752f7663; Wed, 5 May 2021 15:32:07 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=grem.de; h=date:from:to:cc :subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=20180501; bh=0KnRz8jl q+ZfT6aSf0F48KDaQo0=; b=hlFC8DKoTCOz4WxNWVB4BRiVfQxUHIRkCVGmjx4s 3VhbYZLMZoTeKDa3PCrsQVJFVgtZ8rWpRltsnuTiAuSenI6ma2KYHm58uFy4Ohye nCBKvdlJBC3KTXIaLbePlFOZI3JrD7+s/1/Ii5w/ne0KTrsG55+cFeDe8oe6if9v F6iAOJ4kgQqNCPFaLM+fRm6KEwJbCZhXMqFoJ9PblfEZHFWNE/VS0EDrU7j6tF6O sekdr4fzeQUSw4bjIOS3BBkwrsxKHzYYjWI80tUQXciEzmecOFAHEp7A1JV1Ljbp l2/GvP+TxAQRsgqepH5cF7VPVznQlfumNfbsgkCJ+JMM5A== DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=grem.de; h=date:from:to:cc :subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=20180501; b=Rk PdNIHB0csRu+04fNl/OIyQptlEvOID7LHiGO8vSnF359pJY/wvqbhUE1Al9C5L9C dkRJthI78iGnn3qchTdPIWECprgD3VxJomDL8svUu9q/U+MmqtrmaupwBldbSwdp pcF8CoIp0NS2v3u+lw284iyAs5VZN61ri4wY6si4LYdrGkfrIfmIaj9cIT5NurZA 4lyn55oh+5HUZTrkcIBFipY5XFzLn0uxs3tXFtVHBlj31Egc5Ec1MHZbcA002FfH qNZGLY92z09DvON2Hfv0Q791IcwFmUSlqqwAsmfIDqakJvKiSRMeGMYbBkPl4Fw0 Y+GmAFL3BEINVQsk9atA== Received: by mail.evolve.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 3b3200a7 (TLSv1.3:AEAD-CHACHA20-POLY1305-SHA256:256:NO); Wed, 5 May 2021 15:32:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 5 May 2021 17:32:02 +0200 From: Michael Gmelin To: Yasuhiro Kimura Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Making a port to use OpenSSL of ports collection on FreeBSD 11.x Message-ID: <20210505173202.36f1c307@bsd64.grem.de> In-Reply-To: <20210505.232208.1752175478734160028.yasu@utahime.org> References: <20210505.044904.213100914297809480.yasu@utahime.org> <8151EFB0-635D-4648-AF0B-653E45584F1A@grem.de> <20210505.232208.1752175478734160028.yasu@utahime.org> X-Face: $wrgCtfdVw_H9WAY?S&9+/F"!41z'L$uo*WzT8miX?kZ~W~Lr5W7v?j0Sde\mwB&/ypo^}> +a'4xMc^^KroE~+v^&^#[B">soBo1y6(TW6#UZiC]o>C6`ej+i Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAJFBMVEWJBwe5BQDl LASZU0/LTEWEfHbyj0Txi32+sKrp1Mv944X8/fm1rS+cAAAACXBIWXMAAAsTAAAL EwEAmpwYAAAAB3RJTUUH3wESCxwC7OBhbgAAACFpVFh0Q29tbWVudAAAAAAAQ3Jl YXRlZCB3aXRoIFRoZSBHSU1QbbCXAAAAAghJREFUOMu11DFvEzEUAGCfEhBVFzuq AKkLd0O6VrIQsLXVSZXoWE5N1K3DobBBA9fQpRWc8OkWouaIjedWKiyREOKs+3PY fvalCNjgLVHeF7/3bMtBzV8C/VsQ8tecEgCcDgrzjekwKZ7TwsJZd/ywEKwwP+ZM 8P3drTsAwWn2mpWuDDuYiK1bFs6De0KUUFw0tWxm+D4AIhuuvZqtyWYeO7jQ4Aea 7jUqI+ixhQoHex4WshEvSXdood7stlv4oSuFOC4tqGcr0NjEqXgV4mMJO38nld4+ xKNxRDon7khyKVqY7YR4d+Cg0OMrkWXZOM7YDkEfKiilCn1qYv4mighZiynuHHOA Wq9QJq+BIES7lMFUtcikMnkDGHUoncA+uHgrP0ctIEqfwLHzeSo+eUA66AqzwN6n 2ZHJhw6Qh/PoyC/QENyEyC/AyNjq74Bs+3UH0xYwzDUC4B97HgLocg1QLYgDDO1v f3UX9Y307Ew4AHh67YAFFsxEpkXwpXY3eIgMhAAE3R19L919nNnuD2wlPcDE3UeT L2ytEICQib9BXgS2fU8PrD82ToYO1OEmMSnYTjSqSv9wdC0tPYC+rQRQD9ESnldF CyqfmiYW+tlALt8gH2xrMdC/youbjzPXEun+/ReXsMCDyve3dZc09fn2Oas8oXGc Jj6/fOeK5UmSMPmf/jL+GD8BEj0k/Fn6IO4AAAAASUVORK5CYII= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Fb10r13XZz4Svw X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=grem.de header.s=20180501 header.b=hlFC8DKo; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of freebsd@grem.de designates 213.239.217.29 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=freebsd@grem.de X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.50 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[grem.de:s=20180501]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:213.239.217.29/32]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[grem.de]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[213.239.217.29:from:127.0.2.255]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[grem.de:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-0.998]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[213.239.217.29:from]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:213.239.192.0/18, country:DE]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-ports] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 May 2021 15:32:13 -0000 On Wed, 05 May 2021 23:22:08 +0900 (JST) Yasuhiro Kimura wrote: > From: Michael Gmelin > Subject: Re: Making a port to use OpenSSL of ports collection on > FreeBSD 11.x Date: Tue, 4 May 2021 23:05:06 +0200 > > > See > > https://docs.freebsd.org/en/books/porters-handbook/uses/#uses-ssl > > > > Best > > I checked it but couldn't find proper solution. > > I think what is necessary in my case is something like version-spec > argument of 'USES=python'. > > For example, if 'USES=python:3.8+' is specified in Makefile of a port, > lang/python38 is used for it even if user sets > 'DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=python=3.7' in /etc/make.conf. > > But 'USES=ssl' doesn't provide such argument. Which port are you talking about by the way? This worked for me just fine in the past (placed in make.conf): DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=ssl=libressl for LibreSSL and DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=ssl=openssl for openssl from ports. See also: $ head -n12 /usr/ports/Mk/Uses/ssl.mk # Handle dependency on *ssl ports. # # Feature: SSL_DEFAULT # Usage: USES=ssl # Valid ARGS: none (build and run), build, run # # The user can choose which ssl library he wants with: # # DEFAULT_VERSIONS+= ssl= # # Variants being base, openssl, libressl, and libressl-devel. # Cheers, Michael > > --- > Yasuhiro Kimura > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Michael Gmelin From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed May 5 16:01:00 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A48B5FB631 for ; Wed, 5 May 2021 16:01:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yasu@utahime.org) Received: from maybe.home.utahime.org (gate.home.utahime.org [183.180.29.210]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Fb1f24xtYz4TXy for ; Wed, 5 May 2021 16:00:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yasu@utahime.org) Received: from eastasia.home.utahime.org (eastasia.home.utahime.org [192.168.174.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-384) server-digest SHA384) (No client certificate requested) by maybe.home.utahime.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A520BA2C5 for ; Thu, 6 May 2021 01:00:47 +0900 (JST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=utahime.org; s=maybe2019112701; t=1620230447; bh=70BLrkPLdrrYz4r+FNJ8ArUswZC5eGL78o9sKhTkG2Q=; h=Date:To:Subject:From:In-Reply-To:References; b=lQQ66Go9pnarBVAWuk67AjM6r2mPv73IR5EVVGSaU88lYHLNfdIGOwHkUnM92EqdP YQM5uQnwcSuXC0WjMhwXhIVgnweZTrBarPecAxSIz1rZuT4kcebgKzJiDRO5pIdOkt CkYO6iE/57RMj4Fc6BrzJ8QsjlyjXXYkq8T3Nrv6TxtUrwuqB7D92KGoMUIWLELJEx 3JPv/PnGZUnX64ZHdw1puu8BqMyZa5gs5aF6yZ/PPteyUQtxlaBtYJRiMuDjcN2bM7 o5uh/iizeUdSX7aOERv72W2nuPDUmOPYI016lju4lXqnLgMtFWTtImaBfW9XeGDAK6 OGBfgFpPmIlYg== Received: from localhost (rolling.home.utahime.org [192.168.174.11]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-384) server-digest SHA384) (No client certificate requested) by eastasia.home.utahime.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CB72326541; Thu, 6 May 2021 01:00:45 +0900 (JST) X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.103.2 at eastasia.home.utahime.org Date: Thu, 06 May 2021 01:00:02 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20210506.010002.255215505975340477.yasu@utahime.org> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Making a port to use OpenSSL of ports collection on FreeBSD 11.x From: Yasuhiro Kimura In-Reply-To: <20210505173202.36f1c307@bsd64.grem.de> References: <8151EFB0-635D-4648-AF0B-653E45584F1A@grem.de> <20210505.232208.1752175478734160028.yasu@utahime.org> <20210505173202.36f1c307@bsd64.grem.de> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.8 on Emacs 27.2 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Fb1f24xtYz4TXy X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=utahime.org header.s=maybe2019112701 header.b=lQQ66Go9; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of yasu@utahime.org designates 183.180.29.210 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=yasu@utahime.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.70 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+a:spf-authorized.utahime.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; HFILTER_HELO_IP_A(1.00)[maybe.home.utahime.org]; HFILTER_HELO_NORES_A_OR_MX(0.30)[maybe.home.utahime.org]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[utahime.org:+]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-0.999]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[183.180.29.210:from]; ASN(0.00)[asn:2519, ipnet:183.180.0.0/16, country:JP]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[utahime.org:s=maybe2019112701]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[utahime.org]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[183.180.29.210:from:127.0.2.255]; MID_CONTAINS_FROM(1.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-ports] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 May 2021 16:01:00 -0000 From: Michael Gmelin Subject: Re: Making a port to use OpenSSL of ports collection on FreeBSD 11.x Date: Wed, 5 May 2021 17:32:02 +0200 > Which port are you talking about by the way? > > This worked for me just fine in the past (placed in make.conf): > > DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=ssl=libressl > > for LibreSSL and > > DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=ssl=openssl > > for openssl from ports. > > See also: > > $ head -n12 /usr/ports/Mk/Uses/ssl.mk > # Handle dependency on *ssl ports. > # > # Feature: SSL_DEFAULT > # Usage: USES=ssl > # Valid ARGS: none (build and run), build, run > # > # The user can choose which ssl library he wants with: > # > # DEFAULT_VERSIONS+= ssl= > # > # Variants being base, openssl, libressl, and libressl-devel. > # > > Cheers, > Michael You misunderstand my intention. What I would like to do is to make a port use security/openssl instead of base OpenSSL even if user sets 'DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=ssl=base' in /etc/make.conf (or user doesn't customize setting about ssl at all). As I wrote previous mail, if 'USES=python:3.8+' is specified in Makefile of a port, lang/python38 is used for the port event if user adds 'DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=python=3.7' in /etc/make.conf. I'm looking for similar way about ssl setting. --- Yasuhiro Kimura From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed May 5 16:10:48 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5FAC5FB89E for ; Wed, 5 May 2021 16:10:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yasu@utahime.org) Received: from maybe.home.utahime.org (gate.home.utahime.org [183.180.29.210]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Fb1sN1RzYz4VPS for ; Wed, 5 May 2021 16:10:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yasu@utahime.org) Received: from eastasia.home.utahime.org (eastasia.home.utahime.org [192.168.174.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-384) server-digest SHA384) (No client certificate requested) by maybe.home.utahime.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 29430A385 for ; Thu, 6 May 2021 01:10:44 +0900 (JST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=utahime.org; s=maybe2019112701; t=1620231044; bh=TeVOse1Rqc0NOC2z1A4fzRC1yO8bdHGXdHyiFd2wds0=; h=Date:To:Subject:From:In-Reply-To:References; b=Iw/5v0sm59RUjQ2JZUrv5sInugcTFG9CsfZ/s03OMCZ9KhRxkkRQxFeFUbOidYW1P /WhrBRzM9PkEm2p+JDh5Wept6Qq/0954QiO/14uP6yicPzTbGA2xXaIJRneklTKdbv 9V1VchXpaiLFmAVFGR6J9yNHdKVSccJA4dvi6MbBK14s6Uuz7KLkLqOsTmosJfFhq2 wEvbOaBDyfWC5MscPJDQ0u7NHrdYPsOGJbxPCfLSOpp82jL7w27NP41FHzfw3t8pFs jY9QU3awhi2RjUxLOLS4oEs+Xd+GVEE21sR5AAgZgONQP3d/JOqHzcL4SeDhNu2i1v qa3/cEINxa3pQ== Received: from localhost (rolling.home.utahime.org [192.168.174.11]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-384)) (No client certificate requested) by eastasia.home.utahime.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DAB3F265AB; Thu, 6 May 2021 01:10:42 +0900 (JST) X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.103.2 at eastasia.home.utahime.org Date: Thu, 06 May 2021 01:10:37 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20210506.011037.2056308540818173996.yasu@utahime.org> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Making a port to use OpenSSL of ports collection on FreeBSD 11.x From: Yasuhiro Kimura In-Reply-To: References: <8151EFB0-635D-4648-AF0B-653E45584F1A@grem.de> <20210505.232208.1752175478734160028.yasu@utahime.org> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.8 on Emacs 27.2 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Fb1sN1RzYz4VPS X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=utahime.org header.s=maybe2019112701 header.b=Iw/5v0sm; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of yasu@utahime.org designates 183.180.29.210 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=yasu@utahime.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.70 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+a:spf-authorized.utahime.org:c]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; HFILTER_HELO_NORES_A_OR_MX(0.30)[maybe.home.utahime.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; HFILTER_HELO_IP_A(1.00)[maybe.home.utahime.org]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[utahime.org:+]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-0.999]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[183.180.29.210:from]; ASN(0.00)[asn:2519, ipnet:183.180.0.0/16, country:JP]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[utahime.org:s=maybe2019112701]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[utahime.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[183.180.29.210:from:127.0.2.255]; MID_CONTAINS_FROM(1.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-ports] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 May 2021 16:10:49 -0000 From: Chris Subject: Re: Making a port to use OpenSSL of ports collection on FreeBSD 11.x Date: Wed, 05 May 2021 08:03:00 -0700 > I ran into a similar situation requiring freebsd 11 users not use > SSL from base, and I simply used a conditional based against freebsd > version, that also included a RUN_DEPENDS on security/openssl > Wouldn't that work in your case? > > --Chris Probably only adding security/openssl to *_DEPENDS isn't enough. If you look at Mk/Uses/ssl.mk, you'll find the path of include files and libraries are customized depending on which ssl stack is used. So you also need to add similar custimizetion in Makefile of port avoding conflicts with the settings in Mk/Uses/ssl.mk. And it must be hard job. --- Yasuhiro Kimura From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed May 5 16:55:52 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B7275FCE11 for ; Wed, 5 May 2021 16:55:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from se@freebsd.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::24b:4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Fb2sN22fPz4X6g; Wed, 5 May 2021 16:55:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from se@freebsd.org) Received: from Stefans-MBP-449.fritz.box (p200300cd5f1fe900e56ab6cb47958dc8.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [IPv6:2003:cd:5f1f:e900:e56a:b6cb:4795:8dc8]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: se/mail) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C601AFA3C; Wed, 5 May 2021 16:55:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from se@freebsd.org) To: Yasuhiro Kimura References: <8151EFB0-635D-4648-AF0B-653E45584F1A@grem.de> <20210505.232208.1752175478734160028.yasu@utahime.org> <20210505173202.36f1c307@bsd64.grem.de> <20210506.010002.255215505975340477.yasu@utahime.org> From: Stefan Esser Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Making a port to use OpenSSL of ports collection on FreeBSD 11.x Message-ID: <12e142be-43c8-70fc-d0d8-d17969d8c734@freebsd.org> Date: Wed, 5 May 2021 18:55:47 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210506.010002.255215505975340477.yasu@utahime.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="6veyCbbFAYxDX81kkUrpLjqPkg3NDjsZ1" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 May 2021 16:55:52 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --6veyCbbFAYxDX81kkUrpLjqPkg3NDjsZ1 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="wns8g9NQqp4rBXlrIsFJjkj5EbnN7zJ63"; protected-headers="v1" From: Stefan Esser To: Yasuhiro Kimura Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <12e142be-43c8-70fc-d0d8-d17969d8c734@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Making a port to use OpenSSL of ports collection on FreeBSD 11.x References: <8151EFB0-635D-4648-AF0B-653E45584F1A@grem.de> <20210505.232208.1752175478734160028.yasu@utahime.org> <20210505173202.36f1c307@bsd64.grem.de> <20210506.010002.255215505975340477.yasu@utahime.org> In-Reply-To: <20210506.010002.255215505975340477.yasu@utahime.org> --wns8g9NQqp4rBXlrIsFJjkj5EbnN7zJ63 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Am 05.05.21 um 18:00 schrieb Yasuhiro Kimura: > You misunderstand my intention. What I would like to do is to make a > port use security/openssl instead of base OpenSSL even if user sets > 'DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=3Dssl=3Dbase' in /etc/make.conf (or user doesn't > customize setting about ssl at all). You can mark the port as broken if the user has selected "base" and this is incompatible with the port's requirements. E.g.: =2Einclude =2Eif ${SSL_DEFAULT} =3D=3D base BROKEN_FreeBSD_11=3D OpenSSL 1.1 required =2Eendif =2Einclude You can of course add a better message, and the user can decide to try the compilation again after changing the default. But this will of course prevent the building of official packages for FreeBSD-11. > As I wrote previous mail, if 'USES=3Dpython:3.8+' is specified in > Makefile of a port, lang/python38 is used for the port event if user > adds 'DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=3Dpython=3D3.7' in /etc/make.conf. I'm looking = for > similar way about ssl setting. You could add a dependency on the openssl port and make sure, that the port's include file and library is used in preference of the base version on FreeBSD-11. But you have to consider the risk of mixing references to the base and the ports version in one binary (e.g. other libraries are linked in that had been built against the base version). Regards, STefan --wns8g9NQqp4rBXlrIsFJjkj5EbnN7zJ63-- --6veyCbbFAYxDX81kkUrpLjqPkg3NDjsZ1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="OpenPGP_signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="OpenPGP_signature" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- wsB5BAABCAAjFiEEo3HqZZwL7MgrcVMTR+u171r99UQFAmCSzhQFAwAAAAAACgkQR+u171r99UQO qAgAmMc8KgKnXMTMm3J5u0yP6BBVP3QUyZcWIp6UAepm5kF9AHvIx3vIY9WJNoCpjWLFHgEXOIIl wrE2MW6YJkhvfO4vekzgCLwQt7NQV736ycDty4/0eA12WNkFHeXB+HBoZxNxNCjgDB6oN0pIhmqY PoVrhJq/1AWbZAwYcPtpgJCnRpD2uSDbr31o5jhQj8v85yPsGiiU6lav4YCP/HDfKKSV+nUdmskD SZjtiwdirmYqroMgtvUff/XogHv5YLPNiQvMDHKaqXKEyxVubvxLxqPFl5P/esRXCVW2stG8Jvyf gjR/bvv9tD2SiCFRT2D8lqO6AGE8dR/WOvbOh3qO3w== =aWud -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --6veyCbbFAYxDX81kkUrpLjqPkg3NDjsZ1-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed May 5 18:25:14 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 322A75FED36 for ; Wed, 5 May 2021 18:25:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from news@mips.inka.de) Received: from mail.inka.de (mail.inka.de [IPv6:2a04:c9c7:0:1073:217:a4ff:fe3b:e77c]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Fb4rT11p4z4bty for ; Wed, 5 May 2021 18:25:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from news@mips.inka.de) Received: from mips.inka.de (news@[127.0.0.1]) by mail.inka.de with uucp (rmailwrap 0.5) id 1leMCn-0005k8-JC; Wed, 05 May 2021 20:25:05 +0200 Received: from lorvorc.mips.inka.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lorvorc.mips.inka.de (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTP id 145ILHhG002205 for ; Wed, 5 May 2021 20:21:17 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from news@lorvorc.mips.inka.de) Received: (from news@localhost) by lorvorc.mips.inka.de (8.16.1/8.16.1/Submit) id 145ILHmM002204 for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Wed, 5 May 2021 20:21:17 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from news) To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: Christian Weisgerber Newsgroups: list.freebsd.ports Subject: Re: looking for port origin for executable Date: Wed, 5 May 2021 18:21:17 -0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <24721.26936.103525.451533@jerusalem.litteratus.org> User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (FreeBSD) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Fb4rT11p4z4bty X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of news@mips.inka.de has no SPF policy when checking 2a04:c9c7:0:1073:217:a4ff:fe3b:e77c) smtp.mailfrom=news@mips.inka.de X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.80 / 15.00]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FREEFALL_USER(0.00)[news]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[2a04:c9c7:0:1073:217:a4ff:fe3b:e77c:from]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[2a04:c9c7:0:1073:217:a4ff:fe3b:e77c:from:127.0.2.255]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[inka.de]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[naddy@mips.inka.de,news@mips.inka.de]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:202113, ipnet:2a04:c9c7::/32, country:DE]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[naddy@mips.inka.de,news@mips.inka.de]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-ports] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 May 2021 18:25:14 -0000 On 2021-05-04, Robert Huff wrote: > Would some kind soul please tell me which port installs the > executable "g-ir-scanner"? I was purging unused ports and seem to > have done this one by mistake. pkg-which(1) $ pkg which /usr/local/bin/g-ir-scanner /usr/local/bin/g-ir-scanner was installed by package gobject-introspection-1.66.1,1 -- Christian "naddy" Weisgerber naddy@mips.inka.de From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed May 5 19:08:34 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C08035FFBE8 for ; Wed, 5 May 2021 19:08:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@grem.de) Received: from mail.evolve.de (mail.evolve.de [213.239.217.29]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA512 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mail.evolve.de", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Fb5pV26V9z4dpf; Wed, 5 May 2021 19:08:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@grem.de) Received: by mail.evolve.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id d4bc4cb8; Wed, 5 May 2021 19:08:30 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=grem.de; h=content-type :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to :date:cc:message-id:references:to; s=20180501; bh=rYi6xiBj01Gr62 IHeBaEClAOvtY=; b=YuN3KA1ggcmA2Y8ySjnzOfT+OLbTHAH939VkQqcYlycVyI HLHh3IXvHWEz7MCZ4hCMdte/ubyCNzAQObfL9qhYy1VbIPgNZsvBs5aI49vbzAHH Ap1Fg4nQZG+q1MteE+pMZ/x2MIn0RejiIbLInDWlpNGMRqzJRWSco9xBAWEPMCLf zB3zfka8EYDKJKyy/Sma7UqCb7mV13aVtEIBa40eJovN5k7sW7ACDnBpwSzSZ9lX PbMv3X8M/8yBOjrjCLaBm60r3flsAHP59POlul0dwNWHmqYzcfNA5U4kiocoln2w cWeNNEVd8a6f7LmwZGRltrbppd9B5I1NEZdxdcsA== DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=grem.de; h=content-type :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to :date:cc:message-id:references:to; q=dns; s=20180501; b=IcN/uUrx 994cvSnqz8Kv8UVu4O9NulLSynV4WO48ux4tg8BASAXNwYhhpwgEmDHhwA0yzpEI 46OiKtFmUDHI5h4YQj/oUe8CI5gdiJKfRhiVKVwwf2A1KpjBgFfp2a/AAvI0DSAT p7w9tgzBntaPx/MYk2kMd/r2uWe8ZEwoiHPblT99f0pi8fiaVvii4I1pU2UGo8Ew SlC4quPHj/jsahz5KUP4GL48fK9wmwdIvg/NmtE0BsGs3ykFXKq9Bivxz50VAwTH gxQzdaaI4zS945xMhhchtESjzSgrHkduEScrapjEJQQVSUEJfuMhAOvQQX/djqnV L227QaGemejOFQ== Received: by mail.evolve.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 1aae40a2 (TLSv1.3:AEAD-CHACHA20-POLY1305-SHA256:256:NO); Wed, 5 May 2021 19:08:28 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Subject: Re: Making a port to use OpenSSL of ports collection on FreeBSD 11.x From: Michael Gmelin In-Reply-To: <12e142be-43c8-70fc-d0d8-d17969d8c734@freebsd.org> Date: Wed, 5 May 2021 21:08:26 +0200 Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-Id: <881013A8-7223-4A35-8FBE-5247889D2D72@grem.de> References: <12e142be-43c8-70fc-d0d8-d17969d8c734@freebsd.org> To: Stefan Esser , Yasuhiro Kimura X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (18E212) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Fb5pV26V9z4dpf X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 May 2021 19:08:34 -0000 > On 5. May 2021, at 18:56, Stefan Esser wrote: >=20 > =EF=BB=BFAm 05.05.21 um 18:00 schrieb Yasuhiro Kimura: >> You misunderstand my intention. What I would like to do is to make a >> port use security/openssl instead of base OpenSSL even if user sets >> 'DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=3Dssl=3Dbase' in /etc/make.conf (or user doesn't >> customize setting about ssl at all). Stefan=E2=80=98s suggestion is AFAIK the best we can do. mail/opensmtpd has an example of that, but it still requires the user to act= ively select the OpenSSL library (mixing OpenSSL libraries in a package set i= s problematic). Best, Michael >=20 > You can mark the port as broken if the user has selected "base" and > this is incompatible with the port's requirements. E.g.: >=20 > .include >=20 > .if ${SSL_DEFAULT} =3D=3D base > BROKEN_FreeBSD_11=3D OpenSSL 1.1 required > .endif >=20 > .include >=20 > You can of course add a better message, and the user can decide to > try the compilation again after changing the default. But this will > of course prevent the building of official packages for FreeBSD-11. >=20 >> As I wrote previous mail, if 'USES=3Dpython:3.8+' is specified in >> Makefile of a port, lang/python38 is used for the port event if user >> adds 'DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=3Dpython=3D3.7' in /etc/make.conf. I'm looking fo= r >> similar way about ssl setting. >=20 > You could add a dependency on the openssl port and make sure, that > the port's include file and library is used in preference of the > base version on FreeBSD-11. >=20 > But you have to consider the risk of mixing references to the base and > the ports version in one binary (e.g. other libraries are linked in that > had been built against the base version). >=20 > Regards, STefan >=20 From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed May 5 19:12:34 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA9755FFF45 for ; Wed, 5 May 2021 19:12:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@grem.de) Received: from mail.evolve.de (mail.evolve.de [213.239.217.29]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA512 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mail.evolve.de", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Fb5v44yHBz4fK5; Wed, 5 May 2021 19:12:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@grem.de) Received: by mail.evolve.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 6fc97a46; Wed, 5 May 2021 19:12:30 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=grem.de; h=content-type :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to :date:cc:message-id:references:to; s=20180501; bh=KM1Pyb/zRgqlWO +esN4cbTUmjOQ=; b=T+ypQ8Y13laTjHjv3AFH3VoVS7UjgFKekXt+bWNeN3MQv1 zy2ZAT/GOoESEDuq3sF0kS+QTKJQ+ALwgN45ZbMqgyel8c2iX2GE8lqRF5ede4Kq 69hk4Gjtc7AAI1UjrydHeZswR0skikJzN5lqI9pgQ8noBnJ4Z479i33f5IiddSFY z8ucX9Zm/BPsdSAPLJGY27gLgH7E/jCEw5jpMbVnJ5+P5bd93MMV0q4wGoEFMDHb qvsws40BUTmVxh/5AUUnbEAW/Qno0cb3R1ON2hN+QxoOKKX/woRZ0k+6pj6EGU93 uEUfBAcaozSvt475JgLAkQc2aZSdGHWdOTsANbDw== DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=grem.de; h=content-type :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to :date:cc:message-id:references:to; q=dns; s=20180501; b=hFZ4KwWK L3mFSj86eFdvJEgPz4lKK+5d3PaIJruVuqFs85q5yKyvnQma2v4yy6J6bx3+k4i5 y3kl+GyUDvkPzE5g270YK7gU2zv2DxqSJ/CCffs3RXc1e4RIh8GhHw51Kuea6A7U Os+To76g68dugQryK728iMjK6YwFxNJnJTvbpezEYoUMQmKmorVo0XdUB2ob109R zDs2Y/KhcXRd+mZZ/1j6CjaCTRQ/zZDXkk5LzenqYCCBMtg0sjUscmdEjiQD8ZlM ZO1aX/GoH1R99Snha5L0B47q6LmuMnA4WyBwMlBMWa9z3n4G+Jr/9S9SyxY31+WE +e09uCQZfePv0A== Received: by mail.evolve.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 7860f32a (TLSv1.3:AEAD-CHACHA20-POLY1305-SHA256:256:NO); Wed, 5 May 2021 19:12:30 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Subject: Re: looking for port origin for executable From: Michael Gmelin In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 5 May 2021 21:12:28 +0200 Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-Id: References: To: Christian Weisgerber X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (18E212) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Fb5v44yHBz4fK5 X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=grem.de header.s=20180501 header.b=T+ypQ8Y1; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of freebsd@grem.de designates 213.239.217.29 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=freebsd@grem.de X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.00 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[grem.de:s=20180501]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:213.239.217.29/32]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[grem.de]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[213.239.217.29:from:127.0.2.255]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[grem.de:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[213.239.217.29:from]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:213.239.192.0/18, country:DE]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-ports]; FORGED_RECIPIENTS(2.00)[m:naddy@mips.inka.de,s:grembo@freebsd.org] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 May 2021 19:12:34 -0000 > On 5. May 2021, at 20:25, Christian Weisgerber wrote:= >=20 > =EF=BB=BFOn 2021-05-04, Robert Huff wrote: >=20 >> Would some kind soul please tell me which port installs the >> executable "g-ir-scanner"? I was purging unused ports and seem to >> have done this one by mistake. >=20 > pkg-which(1) >=20 > $ pkg which /usr/local/bin/g-ir-scanner > /usr/local/bin/g-ir-scanner was installed by package gobject-introspection= -1.66.1,1 >=20 This only works if the package it came from is still installed. Robert was t= rying to find the package that will give him that file, as he deleted that p= ackage by accident. Best Michael > --=20 > Christian "naddy" Weisgerber naddy@mips.inka.de > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed May 5 20:25:52 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31520622C66 for ; Wed, 5 May 2021 20:25:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portmaster@bsdforge.com) Received: from udns.ultimatedns.net (static-24-113-41-81.wavecable.com [24.113.41.81]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "ultimatedns.net", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Fb7Wg5NJ2z4hpc for ; Wed, 5 May 2021 20:25:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portmaster@bsdforge.com) Received: from ultimatedns.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by udns.ultimatedns.net (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTP id 145KPtZC098999; Wed, 5 May 2021 13:26:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from portmaster@bsdforge.com) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 05 May 2021 13:25:55 -0700 From: Chris To: Yasuhiro Kimura Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Making a port to use OpenSSL of ports collection on FreeBSD 11.x In-Reply-To: <20210506.011037.2056308540818173996.yasu@utahime.org> References: <8151EFB0-635D-4648-AF0B-653E45584F1A@grem.de> <20210505.232208.1752175478734160028.yasu@utahime.org> <20210506.011037.2056308540818173996.yasu@utahime.org> User-Agent: UDNSMS/17.0 Message-ID: <154fe2a4cccad0fb69ef5215fe265456@bsdforge.com> X-Sender: portmaster@bsdforge.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Fb7Wg5NJ2z4hpc X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.00 / 15.00]; ASN(0.00)[asn:11404, ipnet:24.113.0.0/16, country:US]; local_wl_ip(0.00)[24.113.41.81] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 May 2021 20:25:52 -0000 On 2021-05-05 09:10, Yasuhiro Kimura wrote: > From: Chris > Subject: Re: Making a port to use OpenSSL of ports collection on FreeBSD > 11.x > Date: Wed, 05 May 2021 08:03:00 -0700 > >> I ran into a similar situation requiring freebsd 11 users not use >> SSL from base, and I simply used a conditional based against freebsd >> version, that also included a RUN_DEPENDS on security/openssl >> Wouldn't that work in your case? >> >> --Chris > > Probably only adding security/openssl to *_DEPENDS isn't enough. If > you look at Mk/Uses/ssl.mk, you'll find the path of include files and > libraries are customized depending on which ssl stack is used. So you > also need to add similar custimizetion in Makefile of port avoding > conflicts with the settings in Mk/Uses/ssl.mk. And it must be hard > job. Well unless something has changed significantly in that regard over the last couple mos. I found it was enough to trap ${OSREL:R} targeting 11 && within that conditional add ssl=openssl It worked a treat. You may find some additional clues in bsd.default-versions.mk HTH --Chris > > --- > Yasuhiro Kimura > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu May 6 03:49:11 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 073E06316A4 for ; Thu, 6 May 2021 03:49:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fluffy@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::24b:4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FbKMB6VDgz3NY8; Thu, 6 May 2021 03:49:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fluffy@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [192.168.1.6] (host.212-19-20-216.broadband.redcom.ru [212.19.20.216]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: fluffy) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9A11F2562F; Thu, 6 May 2021 03:49:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fluffy@FreeBSD.org) Date: Thu, 6 May 2021 13:49:06 +1000 From: Dima Panov To: Chris , Yasuhiro Kimura Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <154fe2a4cccad0fb69ef5215fe265456@bsdforge.com> References: <8151EFB0-635D-4648-AF0B-653E45584F1A@grem.de> <20210505.232208.1752175478734160028.yasu@utahime.org> <20210506.011037.2056308540818173996.yasu@utahime.org> <154fe2a4cccad0fb69ef5215fe265456@bsdforge.com> Subject: Re: Making a port to use OpenSSL of ports collection on FreeBSD 11.x MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="60936732_46e87ccd_10d27"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.34 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 May 2021 03:49:11 -0000 --60936732_46e87ccd_10d27 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Moin=21 Chris, your suggestion leads to dll hell due to mix-links between ssl lib= raries :( At least, your setup easily face up situation where one lib will be built= with =E2=80=9Cport openss=E2=80=9D and consumers still get a =E2=80=9Cba= se openssl=E2=80=9D. DE=46AULT=5FVERSION here is set to avoid a such situ= ation =E2=80=94 the whole ports collection should be linked with ONE ssl/= crypto library. -- Dima. (desktop, kde, x11, office, ports-secteam)=40=46reeBSD team (fluffy=40=46reeBSD.org, https://t.me/dima=5Fpanov) > On Thursday, May 06, 2021 at 6:26 AM, Chris wrote: > On 2021-05-05 09:10, Yasuhiro Kimura wrote: > > =46rom: Chris > > Subject: Re: Making a port to use OpenSSL of ports collection on =46r= eeBSD > > 11.x > > Date: Wed, 05 May 2021 08:03:00 -0700 > > > > > I ran into a similar situation requiring freebsd 11 users not use > > > SSL from base, and I simply used a conditional based against freebs= d > > > version, that also included a RUN=5FDEPENDS on security/openssl > > > Wouldn't that work in your case=3F > > > > > > --Chris > > > > Probably only adding security/openssl to *=5FDEPENDS isn't enough. If= > > you look at Mk/Uses/ssl.mk, you'll find the path of include files and= > > libraries are customized depending on which ssl stack is used. So you= > > also need to add similar custimizetion in Makefile of port avoding > > conflicts with the settings in Mk/Uses/ssl.mk. And it must be hard > > job. > Well unless something has changed significantly in that regard over > the last couple mos. I found it was enough to trap =24=7BOSREL:R=7D tar= geting > 11 && within that conditional add ssl=3Dopenssl > It worked a treat. You may find some additional clues in > bsd.default-versions.mk > > HTH > > --Chris > > > > --- > > Yasuhiro Kimura > > =5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F= =5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F > > freebsd-ports=40freebsd.org mailing list > > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to =22freebsd-ports-unsubscribe=40freeb= sd.org=22 > =5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F= =5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F > freebsd-ports=40freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to =22freebsd-ports-unsubscribe=40freebsd= .org=22 --60936732_46e87ccd_10d27 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: Canary PGP V3 iQJVBAABCgA/OBxEaW1hIFBhbm92IChGcmVlQlNELk9SRyBDb21taXR0ZXIpIDxm bHVmZnlARnJlZUJTRC5PUkc+BQJgk2cxAAoJEPuLoJ3VOY8p8OsQAOhClVCtfZ9N GKFEx1girABwc+Max/aRv0VqGoX6mzzg1Vu74NzyinJLfFWBco/ulc+ZipANsa3z 3GSwBnM6JY81AZOiaRJBsmn7nt0VvREexm8vId7Nz+ALAlxSo6qOz+9mPU4ZB1pu vrFA8wv7iFprLmjWbVGrD/fECw1xSQAqVtMpQXvVhppQ2+OEW4z1aukLalXSGrDX 7GeHW9DuMc5uROJj7No8Z8GpkwsfIBG17U+2SHrEyKAgLzva9Gr3wVfcWRWO1R+Z 4du5PKlrjpahUXrDZ5HQ550Sbv9HeoYieiCuq6fdgpNp1OGhcn3hqNJ9DNRUnGj2 fSU/lsXn6yTo052PTc5nQQyQVIMIe1gnBERtRkdBWO9qNlXpK5WYp7P7XG8q/Hvs Sf6a+6R/gLGEjl3fG7IX3IB4YPiEVpHYYuk5tdy3t+5IZfvkmx9OdFFdZ2fs7nm9 Mwr/4T0MPBd3WtLY7UeQKXCM9cNOTkvibAY+iUNpZQoW21mEvH2HfMC4ShosK+B1 LgtDjepiL6hTBE1GfBaIM+NKM2ppkVWSdgnRwsKbgFvACaH40MriCTzszpUE+UUI 5f1CR4meSASVviDkqy7VyeAzMZjNzMV37WqhBscGRSy5AymursOFBpbEqkkZwThj /lx0uLjh2ekVZUeiYvzOmI2TmpLyWmj0 =JeGx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --60936732_46e87ccd_10d27-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu May 6 03:52:01 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECAA863172E for ; Thu, 6 May 2021 03:52:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Received: from hz.grosbein.net (hz.grosbein.net [IPv6:2a01:4f8:c2c:26d8::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "hz.grosbein.net", Issuer "hz.grosbein.net" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FbKQS5XGrz3NsD for ; Thu, 6 May 2021 03:52:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Received: from eg.sd.rdtc.ru (root@eg.sd.rdtc.ru [62.231.161.221] (may be forged)) by hz.grosbein.net (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 1463plCQ081596 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 6 May 2021 03:51:48 GMT (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) X-Envelope-From: eugen@grosbein.net X-Envelope-To: ps.ports@smyrak.com Received: from [10.58.0.10] (dadvw [10.58.0.10]) by eg.sd.rdtc.ru (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPS id 1463pg0M017365 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT); Thu, 6 May 2021 10:51:42 +0700 (+07) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Subject: Re: looking for port origin for executable To: Piotr Smyrak , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <24721.26936.103525.451533@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <20210504192848.7e255495@daleth.home> From: Eugene Grosbein Message-ID: <194b8418-f1a4-0217-b211-38134358c6ff@grosbein.net> Date: Thu, 6 May 2021 10:51:33 +0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210504192848.7e255495@daleth.home> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,LOCAL_FROM, NICE_REPLY_A,RDNS_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Report: * -2.3 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record * -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record * 1.9 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS * 2.6 LOCAL_FROM From my domains * -0.0 NICE_REPLY_A Looks like a legit reply (A) X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on hz.grosbein.net X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FbKQS5XGrz3NsD X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=fail (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of eugen@grosbein.net does not designate 2a01:4f8:c2c:26d8::2 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=eugen@grosbein.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.10 / 15.00]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; R_SPF_FAIL(1.00)[-all]; FREEFALL_USER(0.00)[eugen]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[grosbein.net]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[2a01:4f8:c2c:26d8::2:from]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[2a01:4f8:c2c:26d8::2:from:127.0.2.255]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:2a01:4f8::/32, country:DE]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-ports] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 May 2021 03:52:02 -0000 05.05.2021 0:28, Piotr Smyrak wrote: >> Would some kind soul please tell me which port installs the >> executable "g-ir-scanner"? I was purging unused ports and seem to >> have done this one by mistake. > > When I hit a wall like this, this is my usual way to get around without > any additional tools: > > $ find /usr/ports -name pkg-plist | xargs grep -l bin/g-ir-scanner Or just: locale g-ir-scanner Which is much faster as it uses indexed /var/db/locate.database From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu May 6 04:01:58 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E6BF631C16 for ; Thu, 6 May 2021 04:01:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portmaster@bsdforge.com) Received: from udns.ultimatedns.net (static-24-113-41-81.wavecable.com [24.113.41.81]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "ultimatedns.net", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FbKdx5wVxz3NhL; Thu, 6 May 2021 04:01:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portmaster@bsdforge.com) Received: from ultimatedns.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by udns.ultimatedns.net (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTP id 146423sL080274; Wed, 5 May 2021 21:02:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from portmaster@bsdforge.com) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 05 May 2021 21:02:03 -0700 From: Chris To: Dima Panov Cc: Yasuhiro Kimura , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Making a port to use OpenSSL of ports collection on FreeBSD 11.x In-Reply-To: References: <8151EFB0-635D-4648-AF0B-653E45584F1A@grem.de> <20210505.232208.1752175478734160028.yasu@utahime.org> <20210506.011037.2056308540818173996.yasu@utahime.org> <154fe2a4cccad0fb69ef5215fe265456@bsdforge.com> User-Agent: UDNSMS/17.0 Message-ID: <0edc022ebd49e63759293f909a4875d2@bsdforge.com> X-Sender: portmaster@bsdforge.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FbKdx5wVxz3NhL X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 May 2021 04:01:58 -0000 On 2021-05-05 20:49, Dima Panov wrote: > Moin! > > Chris, your suggestion leads to dll hell due to mix-links between ssl > libraries :( > At least, your setup easily face up situation where one lib will be built > with > “port openss” and consumers still get a “base openssl”. DEFAULT_VERSION here > is > set to avoid a such situation — the whole ports collection should be linked > with > ONE ssl/crypto library. I agree. After posting my proposed solution. I was finally able to find _which_ of the ports I did it in. Fortunately, it was an isolated case. Which got me to thinking that _this_ case here had far reaching ramifications. I would have withdrawn my suggestion. But you beat me to it. ;-) Thanks for the reply (and correction), Dima! --Chris > > -- > Dima. (desktop, kde, x11, office, ports-secteam)@FreeBSD team > (fluffy@FreeBSD.org, https://t.me/dima_panov) > >> On Thursday, May 06, 2021 at 6:26 AM, Chris > (mailto:portmaster@bsdforge.com)> wrote: >> On 2021-05-05 09:10, Yasuhiro Kimura wrote: >> > From: Chris >> > Subject: Re: Making a port to use OpenSSL of ports collection on FreeBSD >> > 11.x >> > Date: Wed, 05 May 2021 08:03:00 -0700 >> > >> > > I ran into a similar situation requiring freebsd 11 users not use >> > > SSL from base, and I simply used a conditional based against freebsd >> > > version, that also included a RUN_DEPENDS on security/openssl >> > > Wouldn't that work in your case? >> > > >> > > --Chris >> > >> > Probably only adding security/openssl to *_DEPENDS isn't enough. If >> > you look at Mk/Uses/ssl.mk, you'll find the path of include files and >> > libraries are customized depending on which ssl stack is used. So you >> > also need to add similar custimizetion in Makefile of port avoding >> > conflicts with the settings in Mk/Uses/ssl.mk. And it must be hard >> > job. >> Well unless something has changed significantly in that regard over >> the last couple mos. I found it was enough to trap ${OSREL:R} targeting >> 11 && within that conditional add ssl=openssl >> It worked a treat. You may find some additional clues in >> bsd.default-versions.mk >> >> HTH >> >> --Chris >> > >> > --- >> > Yasuhiro Kimura >> > _______________________________________________ >> > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list >> > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports >> > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list >> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu May 6 05:33:21 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17781635AE7 for ; Thu, 6 May 2021 05:33:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tatsuki_makino@hotmail.com) Received: from APC01-SG2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-oln040092253093.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.92.253.93]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.protection.outlook.com", Issuer "DigiCert Cloud Services CA-1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FbMgM4VL3z3k1R for ; Thu, 6 May 2021 05:33:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tatsuki_makino@hotmail.com) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=Vjsbmdo68u2ImW7rXLTDkiJlLuG19Rh49nYf5Ho/Kqz8Bs+Qeb515Po/CekJSz83E879csvDEq/4HHWzfJXSi74D14H3QyajT1qr85zI2jXqvAnXN9mYV3L9W5TW3VJVqOiWzHyEoBgGlAiREyk6BJplhHDfBM94ahXcr3HG2HgPIu6LyFhdrnHu6jvwAxMoeLbDfWXfP+H1oPXDJSh+oHFFR2DkuLHgpVQ+Yra13oB7ExcEowe5Z7CFgzBP/lkLDQHyfSAEjYgQv9RrQ2XZsgeNDGUDx010p7vo1fWPZL3FI9mnAvTEKop9a/9FagUKSVt2PKX7RYxspni3mXuK5w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=eoVto9oEWByHMlncOumKywC8dkBcO1B4jHtLHo9YACs=; b=mBqj4m269/l0ZFbEsZKfLYq5kuo2y6QuC0LD/xScEZ7ZMqOG26U039TRZ+Kn3nNlnqygVZn/cvK+nesOKlqTwCBgVEYgOcYy+JZM38QCsfOMUNOFxR2Fv7ASiWMgYgOqPIdZeN/g8Lve9q85wupNHjPCLTRLWNcihBLiEOkWD9eDEv/85CPDDcSOpU4/5ihbTn+TUbjJIKt70AYr2xFHATi1yZL0L+nrGoYSs2Nqrke3ZXsR8BHHtPv9Eiu94fMRCdvAGdDhMiU/tGeYb8KAFU4uZnFf0+FtAaydDQJn6cskw0E2ytAvOeObORzKg+7IMmUvcgbWJr9Mr7mp0Yjl/A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=none; dmarc=none; dkim=none; arc=none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hotmail.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=eoVto9oEWByHMlncOumKywC8dkBcO1B4jHtLHo9YACs=; b=XLejSV9tyB7VL0oR4usxcUs4h8CSJ9Y2/8udwUk1gl7KUgQruMLgfdC7ocnxbNz8LPvdWvlgZ+Xbci/U6TPNoiYah6iKERRND0x236PJs6FqOu5Cfmfr8iPO+1X6uiq/7S/7IFaAvtv3tB6YjS1wePdAL9FBXWwf9Bh2q4JJ/mGm7BCWArZlZLdYJkUB23sbIaxnTxyi8SfNNqS4D4qNMujxZylubuUCvqv/M6s95ofIeY61GpYpouvakjW1Kjg6rQBfsWkpAAGokRPb9UeR/xlVjJyNuGjzIm4RmQsdKpJEywf7MG36cGsmq/wjOpdyBMQWiWhyKkhR4NXaJiE4UA== Received: from PSAPR03MB5639.apcprd03.prod.outlook.com (2603:1096:301:66::13) by PS1PR0302MB2522.apcprd03.prod.outlook.com (2603:1096:803:c::18) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.4108.8; Thu, 6 May 2021 05:33:15 +0000 Received: from PSAPR03MB5639.apcprd03.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::c4ad:238c:5d96:7290]) by PSAPR03MB5639.apcprd03.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::c4ad:238c:5d96:7290%7]) with mapi id 15.20.4129.011; Thu, 6 May 2021 05:33:15 +0000 Subject: Re: looking for port origin for executable To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <24721.26936.103525.451533@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <20210504192848.7e255495@daleth.home> From: Tatsuki Makino Message-ID: Date: Thu, 6 May 2021 14:33:12 +0900 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/52.0 SeaMonkey/2.49.4 In-Reply-To: <20210504192848.7e255495@daleth.home> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TMN: [XOQrWBE/Qmec06W2IaKeoo74p4XXrXaW] X-ClientProxiedBy: TYWPR01CA0011.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com (2603:1096:400:a9::16) To PSAPR03MB5639.apcprd03.prod.outlook.com (2603:1096:301:66::13) X-Microsoft-Original-Message-ID: <07b56db8-8c33-058b-2b7e-5b0fee742dcb@hotmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MS-Exchange-MessageSentRepresentingType: 1 Received: from T4.test (121.95.66.131) by TYWPR01CA0011.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com (2603:1096:400:a9::16) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.4108.25 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 6 May 2021 05:33:15 +0000 X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: b116fd1e-ecdf-4c49-818b-08d910507275 X-MS-Exchange-SLBlob-MailProps: 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 X-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: PS1PR0302MB2522: X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0; X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info: pL1zWDms+MZhEujmnIOD58Ip4Vk9h0SVh5Y3d6J/X6vhMI0ZqecDbbAdmsq6FmWT0EwGcqkIqlYrHcgrTfTXTlCQbpMkCeI6owMnRilLvgbOAD/1nOfA8SxAgVUL0KxDCXT6VKGZJUXWg6+M1ywxhyHL9zOR64TxsCzwqJD3ntBcfAnetYo3+3MojNHyYq3omxqrwR4rWjYE+rhIt0387PbuVzLoqDauJ8N2vKLBXEX7LT0K8aAHdcd3+cnl0ZyxBMuT9F3icsg2OZfFhMvux/tfrPONjXch2Zf7HKIivrLwauFXd58PbMpc+HyeaC6Mjj9SZnZzHHSzfRMxjSx+PlM5b4zmretZZHU7z3efo3zJ595UrDeFrawyG9rGH4eer9e6215o+z6KCKqPpA4t9g== X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData: RTHw7XAQ143Ub1nUiggZGTQPZ72nefqZT+PnTCCckldN+cp/hydyknusf/XgPhECNtPcSTq5unTVQtVESpfgYIRf/Yi/DnrQjilRzxRSfY+IuiQoLKtVz4QWTE/XcKOH8C17WUu3f91YnBcyOSjMfw== X-OriginatorOrg: sct-15-20-3174-8-msonline-outlook-792b7.templateTenant X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: b116fd1e-ecdf-4c49-818b-08d910507275 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: PSAPR03MB5639.apcprd03.prod.outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 May 2021 05:33:15.5896 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-RMS-PersistedConsumerOrg: 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000 X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: PS1PR0302MB2522 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FbMgM4VL3z3k1R X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=hotmail.com header.s=selector1 header.b=XLejSV9t; arc=pass (microsoft.com:s=arcselector9901:i=1); dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=hotmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of tatsuki_makino@hotmail.com designates 40.92.253.93 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=tatsuki_makino@hotmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.50 / 15.00]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[hotmail.com]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:40.92.0.0/15]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[hotmail.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[hotmail.com,none]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[40.92.253.93:from]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[hotmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:8075, ipnet:40.80.0.0/12, country:US]; ARC_ALLOW(-1.00)[microsoft.com:s=arcselector9901:i=1]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.996]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[hotmail.com:s=selector1]; FORGED_MUA_SEAMONKEY_MSGID_UNKNOWN(2.50)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[hotmail.com:dkim]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[40.92.253.93:from:127.0.2.255]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[40.92.253.93:from]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[40.92.253.93:from]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-ports] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 May 2021 05:33:21 -0000 Piotr Smyrak wrote on 2021/05/05 02:28: > $ find /usr/ports -name pkg-plist | xargs grep -l bin/g-ir-scanner If grep is to be used, then grep -rn --include \*/Makefile\* --include \*/pkg-plist\* -e g-ir-scanner /usr/ports It can also be picked up to some extent from PLIST_FILES in the Makefile. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu May 6 05:46:52 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B86196376A8 for ; Thu, 6 May 2021 05:46:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Received: from hz.grosbein.net (hz.grosbein.net [IPv6:2a01:4f8:c2c:26d8::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "hz.grosbein.net", Issuer "hz.grosbein.net" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FbMz03Ww1z3kfM; Thu, 6 May 2021 05:46:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Received: from eg.sd.rdtc.ru (root@eg.sd.rdtc.ru [62.231.161.221] (may be forged)) by hz.grosbein.net (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 1465kRZU082203 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 6 May 2021 05:46:28 GMT (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) X-Envelope-From: eugen@grosbein.net X-Envelope-To: fluffy@FreeBSD.org Received: from [10.58.0.10] (dadvw [10.58.0.10]) by eg.sd.rdtc.ru (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPS id 1465kNYf026816 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT); Thu, 6 May 2021 12:46:23 +0700 (+07) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Subject: Re: Making a port to use OpenSSL of ports collection on FreeBSD 11.x To: Dima Panov , Chris , Yasuhiro Kimura References: <8151EFB0-635D-4648-AF0B-653E45584F1A@grem.de> <20210505.232208.1752175478734160028.yasu@utahime.org> <20210506.011037.2056308540818173996.yasu@utahime.org> <154fe2a4cccad0fb69ef5215fe265456@bsdforge.com> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: Eugene Grosbein Message-ID: Date: Thu, 6 May 2021 12:46:14 +0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,LOCAL_FROM, NICE_REPLY_A,RDNS_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Report: * -2.3 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record * -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record * 1.9 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS * 2.6 LOCAL_FROM From my domains * -0.0 NICE_REPLY_A Looks like a legit reply (A) X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on hz.grosbein.net X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FbMz03Ww1z3kfM X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 May 2021 05:46:52 -0000 06.05.2021 10:49, Dima Panov wrote: > Chris, your suggestion leads to dll hell due to mix-links between ssl libraries :( > At least, your setup easily face up situation where one lib will be built with “port openss” and consumers still get a “base openssl”. > DEFAULT_VERSION here is set to avoid a such situation — the whole ports collection should be linked with ONE ssl/crypto library. I disagree. There is no reason for "leaf" ports to depend on ports version of openssl and this is impossible in come cases. For example, net/mpd5 port that links with base libfetch that links with base openssl. So, net/mpd5 must NOT be linked with ports openssl and frankly, it needs not. Global inflexible knob for whole ports tree is bad thing. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu May 6 09:22:36 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11E765F86A2 for ; Thu, 6 May 2021 09:22:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FbSlv6ykNz4T9j for ; Thu, 6 May 2021 09:22:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id ECF235F82EE; Thu, 6 May 2021 09:22:35 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECB5D5F8907 for ; Thu, 6 May 2021 09:22:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FbSlv6JKPz4SxR for ; Thu, 6 May 2021 09:22:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (portscout.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB97C15F89 for ; Thu, 6 May 2021 09:22:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.nyi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.10]) by portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 1469MZM3032580 for ; Thu, 6 May 2021 09:22:35 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 1469MZ1i032552; Thu, 6 May 2021 09:22:35 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <202105060922.1469MZ1i032552@portscout.nyi.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.nyi.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Thu, 6 May 2021 09:22:35 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 May 2021 09:22:36 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ lang/gnustep-base | 1_27_0 | base-1_28_0 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ x11-toolkits/gnustep-back | 0_28_0 | back-0_29_0 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ x11-toolkits/gnustep-gui | 0_28_0 | gui-0_29_0 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Reported by: portscout! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu May 6 16:25:17 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B05C627204 for ; Thu, 6 May 2021 16:25:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ale@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::24b:4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Fbf7d06Bpz4qmh for ; Thu, 6 May 2021 16:25:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ale@FreeBSD.org) Received: from ale.bitgold.com (151-0-207-195.ip282.fastwebnet.it [151.0.207.195]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: ale) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9F0462B51D; Thu, 6 May 2021 16:25:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ale@FreeBSD.org) Subject: Re: USES=cargo vs. workspaces From: Alex Dupre To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, freebsd-rust@freebsd.org References: <72cc189f-178d-008c-f2de-9a32b72fcd9e@FreeBSD.org> Message-ID: Date: Thu, 6 May 2021 18:25:14 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <72cc189f-178d-008c-f2de-9a32b72fcd9e@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 May 2021 16:25:17 -0000 On 07/10/19 09:41, Alex Dupre wrote: >> Some projects (e.g., Servo, Veloren) bundle several packages together. >> When dependencies also bundle packages it confuses "git" override. >> Any tips/workarounds that scale beyond 1 port? > > I haven't a solution, I can just say that I have the same issue with the > parity ethereum client (that in fact it's not in the ports tree yet). With the latest openethereum update, that adds the new rethutil dependency, the issue came up again: ===> Configuring for openethereum-3.2.5 error: failed to get `reth-util` as a dependency of package `ethcore v1.12.0 (/wrkdirs/usr/ports/net-p2p/openethereum/work/openethereum-3.2.5/crates/ethcore)` Caused by: failed to load source for dependency `reth-util` Caused by: Unable to update /wrkdirs/usr/ports/net-p2p/openethereum/work/reth-573e128487d5651f301e21faa97fc8e80f91dee8 Caused by: found a virtual manifest at `/wrkdirs/usr/ports/net-p2p/openethereum/work/reth-573e128487d5651f301e21faa97fc8e80f91dee8/Cargo.toml` instead of a package manifest ** Error code 101 Stop. make: stopped in /usr/ports/net-p2p/openethereum CC'ing freebsd-rust@ since they maintain the cargo stuff. Any help is appreciated. -- Alex Dupre From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu May 6 16:32:17 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E647627428 for ; Thu, 6 May 2021 16:32:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jbeich@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [96.47.72.132]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FbfHj1vr2z4qv6; Thu, 6 May 2021 16:32:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jbeich@freebsd.org) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1620318737; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=mvqCT3TM1djsNOfzX6GDWhygglMhYs3G63pSHccDPQE=; b=wB5FJ6oyAlvA1XhoQ+sbbCtcsZOTxEjuubiATv45E68iTeOzj1LvZOZkkYqovadFV6xP9f U6ePt4FEMge54n91v08VxoREmb4ForX6XzcxIC9H5fBHpABsSDLexzJi2RhqzS+oClVz24 de41IjCsPQgN0sMspj4eY0EruJ5AWe5e9F0HGjzwomH+qTwR2b9ymyfZR7PznqvBKYZqHP cR+TdKyMU8TAaQD0mTclhLa63c3DSIYg1jcazVr/2NdS9GQbNA5ZIOkSmixDJ7jnvA4TMD Dl2b7AL74C5POjTFH8P8wu5I2NcqPQLIE3L5vGgd4c3G8W64ZSx/xUxPEYUVyg== Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1354) id 2972C1F77D; Thu, 6 May 2021 16:32:17 +0000 (UTC) From: Jan Beich To: Alex Dupre Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, freebsd-rust@freebsd.org Subject: Re: USES=cargo vs. workspaces References: <72cc189f-178d-008c-f2de-9a32b72fcd9e@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 06 May 2021 18:32:13 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Alex Dupre's message of "Thu, 6 May 2021 18:25:14 +0200") Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1620318737; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=mvqCT3TM1djsNOfzX6GDWhygglMhYs3G63pSHccDPQE=; b=o0XNsWewbfYAMHtP35wErhUZr2LEhcFWzZzn8O73Vo9cVygX/h529z50EByDfkNwYapxDz pcx23oXxUsQp9MyqjP6wyTKJ8a4HAPkmHof6TzJSQT3bWHsB3kzUh1Zev6YIO3CEBDNqpt qVy9XckIe64iuG3/3bW2zyynxm5+qHG8jZCsK5J2M56tHznfukGKh5j3VVy217X9cbH3TG +Qxx/znD4qp5P91tPx8ga3CWWpj/gQKociu63ijjavaXXZXtDFYV+8GqgPP49DGlnQNN9q QlX+RmB7NMq+mt+F/Lul4WsKzeMUFP7YmZDgMepTV/mW0xQMJ1jy3G9Om/aFKA== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1620318737; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=Uedvy2IdQDS3jaNIunvf6VVIt4PvLekTEpfGYKaEFMsvtTOhEKbwC0s+nQ5+kSkIleNMvV xcf5ZjNSVjt/1+Uki8AgVTEjkjBebSkNTbhmh1pEJmTttFzSVDGWr1lwLwNiwj1K+ldPZn jHMKo+IAKSv8ApNKf8MvNEr30Y72E/zIqzC9yl7yWh2odzeGRVc3Z5QKiISRjeSChNMDhe BjAJ7TsqJcx77KVd4itJ9BpI9JchEldHF/FiEWtBCe27C5/UezC32OL1PbyARHE06lxpG+ GcBJ8lTGKMlkGL0C4uFVddARJNVpIWRd7LPpG7HXz/dmbYzCDNc/emvzB9rInA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 May 2021 16:32:17 -0000 Alex Dupre writes: > On 07/10/19 09:41, Alex Dupre wrote: > >>> Some projects (e.g., Servo, Veloren) bundle several packages together. >>> When dependencies also bundle packages it confuses "git" override. >>> Any tips/workarounds that scale beyond 1 port? >> >> I haven't a solution, I can just say that I have the same issue with the >> parity ethereum client (that in fact it's not in the ports tree yet). > > With the latest openethereum update, that adds the new rethutil > dependency, the issue came up again: > > ===> Configuring for openethereum-3.2.5 > error: failed to get `reth-util` as a dependency of package `ethcore > v1.12.0 > (/wrkdirs/usr/ports/net-p2p/openethereum/work/openethereum-3.2.5/crates/ethcore)` > > Caused by: > failed to load source for dependency `reth-util` > > Caused by: > Unable to update > /wrkdirs/usr/ports/net-p2p/openethereum/work/reth-573e128487d5651f301e21faa97fc8e80f91dee8 > > Caused by: > found a virtual manifest at > `/wrkdirs/usr/ports/net-p2p/openethereum/work/reth-573e128487d5651f301e21faa97fc8e80f91dee8/Cargo.toml` > instead of a package manifest > ** Error code 101 Did you try CARGO_GIT_SUBDIR? See https://cgit.freebsd.org/ports/commit/?id=ab415159b8b9 If that commit message is still unclear check existing consumers: $ rg -l CARGO_GIT_SUBDIR Mk/Uses/cargo.mk dns/dog/Makefile games/veloren/Makefile security/bitwarden_rs/Makefile sysutils/vector/Makefile x11/wmfocus/Makefile From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu May 6 16:54:28 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E383627A63 for ; Thu, 6 May 2021 16:54:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ale@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [96.47.72.83]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FbfnH6P48z4rpT; Thu, 6 May 2021 16:54:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ale@FreeBSD.org) Received: from ale.bitgold.com (151-0-207-195.ip282.fastwebnet.it [151.0.207.195]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: ale) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 82B472B823; Thu, 6 May 2021 16:54:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ale@FreeBSD.org) Subject: Re: USES=cargo vs. workspaces To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, rust@FreeBSD.org References: <72cc189f-178d-008c-f2de-9a32b72fcd9e@FreeBSD.org> From: Alex Dupre Message-ID: <88da3e16-1a37-4332-0d5f-2ad6f87376f8@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 6 May 2021 18:54:26 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 May 2021 16:54:28 -0000 On 06/05/21 18:32, Jan Beich wrote: > Did you try CARGO_GIT_SUBDIR? See https://cgit.freebsd.org/ports/commit/?id=ab415159b8b9 > If that commit message is still unclear check existing consumers: Thanks, it worked! I wasn't aware of it. -- Alex Dupre From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu May 6 18:49:02 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5425162AE34 for ; Thu, 6 May 2021 18:49:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd@www.zefox.net) Received: from www.zefox.net (www.zefox.net [50.1.20.27]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "www.zefox.com", Issuer "www.zefox.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FbjKS6MWXz4xsQ for ; Thu, 6 May 2021 18:49:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd@www.zefox.net) Received: from www.zefox.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by www.zefox.net (8.16.1/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 146Imukf067987 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 6 May 2021 11:48:57 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fbsd@www.zefox.net) Received: (from fbsd@localhost) by www.zefox.net (8.16.1/8.15.2/Submit) id 146ImulL067986 for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Thu, 6 May 2021 11:48:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fbsd) Date: Thu, 6 May 2021 11:48:56 -0700 From: bob prohaska To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: www/chromium runs but drop down menu vanishes on Pi4 Message-ID: <20210506184856.GA67954@www.zefox.net> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FbjKS6MWXz4xsQ X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of fbsd@www.zefox.net has no SPF policy when checking 50.1.20.27) smtp.mailfrom=fbsd@www.zefox.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.81 / 15.00]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; WWW_DOT_DOMAIN(0.50)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[50.1.20.27:from]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[50.1.20.27:from:127.0.2.255]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[zefox.net]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.71)[-0.711]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7065, ipnet:50.1.16.0/20, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-ports]; MID_RHS_WWW(0.50)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 May 2021 18:49:02 -0000 On Sun, May 02, 2021 at 04:10:44PM +0000, bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org wrote: > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246982 > > --- Comment #25 from Mikael Urankar --- > (In reply to Bob Prohaska from comment #24) > just update your ports tree. > The latest version of www/chromium compiled without a hitch on the Pi4, but drop-down controls menu (far right end of URL bar) won't stay dropped down when the browser is running on the console. If I ssh -X into the Pi4 and open chrome the drop-down seems to work correctly. The X terminal is another Pi4 running RaspiOS. There are lots of warnings on the controlling terminal. The last few from the X session are: [1881:100622:0506/112524.929414:ERROR:bus.cc(393)] Failed to connect to the bus: Failed to connect to socket /var/run/dbus/system_bus_socket: No such file or directory [1881:100622:0506/112524.929991:ERROR:bus.cc(393)] Failed to connect to the bus: Failed to connect to socket /var/run/dbus/system_bus_socket: No such file or directory [1881:100622:0506/112524.930610:ERROR:bus.cc(393)] Failed to connect to the bus: Failed to connect to socket /var/run/dbus/system_bus_socket: No such file or directory [1960:100509:0506/112632.126032:ERROR:viz_main_impl.cc(150)] Exiting GPU process due to errors during initialization [1982:100388:0506/112641.680603:ERROR:gl_implementation.cc(285)] Failed to load /usr/local/share/chromium/swiftshader/libGLESv2.so: Cannot open "/usr/local/share/chromium/swiftshader/libGLESv2.so" [1982:100388:0506/112641.686824:ERROR:viz_main_impl.cc(150)] Exiting GPU process due to errors during initialization [1983:100532:0506/112642.770040:ERROR:gpu_init.cc(426)] Passthrough is not supported, GL is disabled [1887:100608:0506/112836.827661:ERROR:child_thread_impl.cc(336)] Crashing because hung Could this be a configuration error? Apart from the vanishing control dropdown chrome seems to work reasonably well, despite the warnings. Thanks for reading, bob prohaska From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu May 6 03:42:02 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1CB36314AE for ; Thu, 6 May 2021 03:42:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from web@3dresearch.com) Received: from smtpg.telissant.net (smtpg.telissant.net [104.225.1.73]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FbKBx6F0dz3N0v for ; Thu, 6 May 2021 03:42:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from web@3dresearch.com) Received: from sacada.3dresearch.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtpg.telissant.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FbKBp6pRsz2D1r9 for ; Wed, 5 May 2021 23:41:54 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at telissant.net Received: from smtpg.telissant.net ([127.0.0.1]) by sacada.3dresearch.com (sacada.3dresearch.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RL6I7kg8ENIv for ; Wed, 5 May 2021 23:41:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: from buffrescue.3dresearch.com (unknown [71.112.245.111]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: buffrescue@sacada.3dresearch.com) by smtpg.telissant.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4FbKBp3gckz2D1r7 for ; Wed, 5 May 2021 23:41:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: from buffrescue.3dresearch.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by buffrescue.3dresearch.com (Postfix) with SMTP id E64F16090F for ; Wed, 5 May 2021 23:41:53 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 5 May 2021 23:41:36 -0400 From: Janos Dohanics To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: graphics/wayland error: unknown argument: '-fno-color-diagnostics' Message-Id: <20210505234136.f5ba7d7047125a213b07880a@3dresearch.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.33; amd64-portbld-freebsd12.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FbKBx6F0dz3N0v X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of web@3dresearch.com designates 104.225.1.73 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=web@3dresearch.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.79 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ENVFROM_SERVICE_ACCT(1.00)[]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.99)[-0.990]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[71.112.245.111:received]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[104.225.1.73:from]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:36236, ipnet:104.225.1.0/24, country:US]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; RCVD_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[3dresearch.com]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[104.225.1.73:from:127.0.2.255]; FROM_SERVICE_ACCT(1.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-ports] X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 06 May 2021 19:04:05 +0000 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 May 2021 03:42:02 -0000 Hello, trying to build graphics/wayland on a newly installed system (FreeBSD 13.0-STABLE #0 stable/13-n245524-11af9a9cf93: Wed May 5 17:58:25 EDT 2021): https://pastebin.com/mdK0yscg Would you please advise? -- Janos Dohanics From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu May 6 19:20:57 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D958162BA16 for ; Thu, 6 May 2021 19:20:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jbeich@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:6074::16:84]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Fbk2K5rp5z506d; Thu, 6 May 2021 19:20:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jbeich@freebsd.org) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1620328857; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=1LHlbkLg2paNLr69u/VySpGiA3RaCEcfWudQjQUzNFI=; b=iWYyABeMmDIIjbWfZQsjP+8xhOTonWEJshOdzkMZlO10XRZ8PZtnZbmYPELUjGw7RDKCNM 27Tu4XfdHFmChp1kQjjeEeL+3/dOuk0SnBzuUXTySeCs00u8N5Nx5Sj4cqJN8/vBun6bDK ltrY5FF3enkew9x1Ko+3XQingEFPJFzo72lpVqrxOaWimlhXQqYMoMsCmXS2RoMlWGBtwQ 7lBrBlUIKikeDYiQY23/rz0Oh3WJhwGk2Km6waSItYSuOTTcgA5V9PZK/wgM4ly7Odi/GR R2ihMMbTnK3Kupb+HivvBpSs3rdyxwxKQCxL1SZYK7XPdeeMedRQTARqhiBkTA== Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1354) id B1AD6185; Thu, 6 May 2021 19:20:57 +0000 (UTC) From: Jan Beich To: Janos Dohanics Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: graphics/wayland error: unknown argument: '-fno-color-diagnostics' References: <20210505234136.f5ba7d7047125a213b07880a@3dresearch.com> Date: Thu, 06 May 2021 21:20:55 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20210505234136.f5ba7d7047125a213b07880a@3dresearch.com> (Janos Dohanics's message of "Wed, 5 May 2021 23:41:36 -0400") Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1620328857; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=1LHlbkLg2paNLr69u/VySpGiA3RaCEcfWudQjQUzNFI=; b=BHoNb4hvH7V7EZlFbM5SqEcr+tOVYTNOyuff9iyNnr+eLCWkYPTWS/Jq+KI0Tfjr3c8uMq OsccQnx+2yDq+qpSIRI/oWwN+WTgjstcLbZnP+1xZl29H2GAOFfQ/3932qZL1yntMvG7Af OaYRd2kCf68Uyi16j477TuB9tWbZYgT7RxzUgbleciM/HQeH5MI5Uh89crkGKBd9wdyoRw 6rp7JXi627C1akNHLMWHBLWF4vGo8EsMW9NI0oZJ9dy7ZutnJySi1Fi/b+kCE3IuAwSqO7 95RgcwkHCOt/hStz+VDlWwJsprXm+KFNkgTMSG0q6iDiThDl/KKzpavAPsM4lg== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1620328857; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=DVgavTH+YkCV5cjoxP1+VV09Hx5fLMMjUN9yuX+rZDW5lhp3a1DdGICP1JxgDePSmmw8EX guoRW1ybtjrMB5qer6x7sZflBYkfUnpnctar/WI11SPeW8jYpKECmezzmoRF5j5Sh3UCH6 OKlTwrZPPXoQ4NyOxjcZWLQQkOU0CKTixpn2WcP4jQCK+KCKmoBWhwuugjwYwEGMa8C0cW 0+0Wi7CfzxBPO6SEQk4b5NXT9dN9s4RuLWGboh9wsiudRZJ2PYigdV/WGKWjjpuyVjK6l4 c7UCNDh0Qvz6W7w0mLQnHhsBjkRWSdLsnYzqsHPNb2C4VifN0f4iExC+/yEL2Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 May 2021 19:20:57 -0000 Janos Dohanics writes: > Hello, > > trying to build graphics/wayland on a newly installed system (FreeBSD > 13.0-STABLE #0 stable/13-n245524-11af9a9cf93: Wed May 5 17:58:25 EDT > 2021): > > https://pastebin.com/mdK0yscg > > Would you please advise? Did you partially upgrade? devel/meson was fixed at the same time colors were force-disabled for USES=meson consumers. https://cgit.freebsd.org/ports/commit/?id=ff2796d5bc83 From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu May 6 20:50:33 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CDFD62DC5A for ; Thu, 6 May 2021 20:50:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tatsuki_makino@hotmail.com) Received: from APC01-HK2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-hk2apc01olkn0830.outbound.protection.outlook.com [IPv6:2a01:111:f400:febc::830]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.protection.outlook.com", Issuer "DigiCert Cloud Services CA-1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Fbm1g5LHCz53lY for ; Thu, 6 May 2021 20:50:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tatsuki_makino@hotmail.com) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=ffY9LAwVB5Ym062BzokKJswhrdxZTFjm2yqs8Zf5jPUmEH1mNu0Oq30bDh5x5oz4RtZdaLE72K8PAO++TYCpqWmcY1eAs/Lqm/CO3bHeVLOWiOChhI2GgUVcyYmX95W2kyq0bQWnlqZJezMJnfIJH4l4mHmtpMADWZQ9/fkeRJkXhJensuXD8QIZUV3j3zyIRLSocYAmkCJSyOtgbgS7yXKGL6oCwf17yV6HWfxfsOqV3DEVHN7QE/jYrMEZ7NW1H0KVIyaQ6mubfjPyJFN63JqDBY5lwmAHsZSq2ucjFq+88a02q+p6WeNXg8K/XvaNQfXtZ+VjJHxgvr9i/8O1Ug== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=ZBA1+QltnIn4rp4kgEZSy2HWFUUHKxD/+EVFWEJTkNI=; b=MWpgap59ac7iOdFJAUk9R1DNygw0JVZMBGmFaX1J6GkVlSuM6DLhIcFfjS7MEnb73QADBY9+J5ZzaKjROSd/w62IM66OTfe0M9PxlWKwK/kj9NgNUbgmxLMGKPuzPjl3PwvZH3w2u0D/7DSLt7+IKyigeePEJ3LwTt7QRMA8wKhEOkI3qRf9u8wxJypoaXA4mmPg0gEq+VJ2HLj4l4I9tufEgiZKsg+U4ug7326AhgyQ83ZWboPFO2n4sOTgFeL8xP5iW4o7lct1Qnuh33lhKN8hqukHzJMPFhvutOxe70BTGAUabtkzViwxbZbC1/8FIjstgKbxqA4aecxnNymF2Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=none; dmarc=none; dkim=none; arc=none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hotmail.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=ZBA1+QltnIn4rp4kgEZSy2HWFUUHKxD/+EVFWEJTkNI=; b=ogv02XImc6wHJM7g+Tm0tavoaZvOFiI8hVIWHtdWJjWOisAxr6n6VWFinHqwjnz1eKKf5h5ZTdeeNjBFgIaoLTuzlb8guVxoQnyJPgnbhYEpGkib2ggU7849JA8vnUENd/4WmB9unYKCWOOAeZaartu2PURybxL/rBfTRv2nYipV+rzV3cY+WeqaSUZzQ5YhydbGjl6DmEfFyALCrX4OTOD4fEwHQzdCKo+eFTke5FWZl4kAxonUMGBjYaMBaLy3fEDwOzSvhrfOWafxM+wLvf95P24l4N5xYoEHc51emJC0pIhPg0EwEdHT9MSSuB+Fp1t/0wwY6bwzFPtPKIR3WA== Received: from PSAPR03MB5639.apcprd03.prod.outlook.com (2603:1096:301:66::13) by PS1PR03MB3381.apcprd03.prod.outlook.com (2603:1096:803:4c::11) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.4108.16; Thu, 6 May 2021 20:50:23 +0000 Received: from PSAPR03MB5639.apcprd03.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::c4ad:238c:5d96:7290]) by PSAPR03MB5639.apcprd03.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::c4ad:238c:5d96:7290%7]) with mapi id 15.20.4129.011; Thu, 6 May 2021 20:50:23 +0000 Subject: Re: www/chromium runs but drop down menu vanishes on Pi4 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <20210506184856.GA67954@www.zefox.net> From: Tatsuki Makino Message-ID: Date: Fri, 7 May 2021 05:50:21 +0900 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/52.0 SeaMonkey/2.49.4 In-Reply-To: <20210506184856.GA67954@www.zefox.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TMN: [ivfmBgY7npj8cy7EyCdlHcIJTbexB4CL] X-ClientProxiedBy: TY2PR02CA0019.apcprd02.prod.outlook.com (2603:1096:404:56::31) To PSAPR03MB5639.apcprd03.prod.outlook.com (2603:1096:301:66::13) X-Microsoft-Original-Message-ID: <83719170-9c57-7f69-4672-a94ff2bae6a1@hotmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MS-Exchange-MessageSentRepresentingType: 1 Received: from T4.test (121.95.66.131) by TY2PR02CA0019.apcprd02.prod.outlook.com (2603:1096:404:56::31) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.4108.25 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 6 May 2021 20:50:23 +0000 X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: c014b3f9-2a48-486c-d047-08d910d091a8 X-MS-Exchange-SLBlob-MailProps: 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 X-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: PS1PR03MB3381: X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0; X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info: +E113QScxqwoEFaJbFOQbk9ypc0mBA+8ov8Wcwv95rJR/oo/nV+8tmfICEdut6qcrdUQnPurQ8j4J+v/rx2Z1RLrK3esQ8zDxWpKjXyRiPcxegbr1ecXZz1qa4KIA4NzngCdv437iCsiJs4wyVhfjql6xGriIu6iPhXZY/Tsb4prJiBp8GNXT0qpm5D6iSchE4xlfux3PSy3FLGjHP30hulbuPnzs7fBgwGjynJwkkO0AXsix6wxVRyJlW8R7OxBELdTRJiMpmisCMsISrqG2tey0yVoTJHDUeu0W+Cl1VYOaE5Kxe0LRhjIT8tNboIdRfunU122hE0HU3tnAYFtNJEvtr3fSmyotd7uLpYWdymwu+CwbM1Fm+ZM0STJmkc3 X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData: RBWhcF2QLmPE1SwabTvdihV3Rh92SbsTales1tYp3JvAY2wjtvlOm23lzSvMdUUZtnw0cZlZbeTSVU5BJI31PbtSRMTs0/rV68GVDdsySnNATCfxVyQnwjr8w8mZSdjPgbqAyFw3vnB9YZ/wSd5qXA== X-OriginatorOrg: sct-15-20-3174-8-msonline-outlook-792b7.templateTenant X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: c014b3f9-2a48-486c-d047-08d910d091a8 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: PSAPR03MB5639.apcprd03.prod.outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 May 2021 20:50:23.5962 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-RMS-PersistedConsumerOrg: 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000 X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: PS1PR03MB3381 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Fbm1g5LHCz53lY X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=hotmail.com header.s=selector1 header.b=ogv02XIm; arc=pass (microsoft.com:s=arcselector9901:i=1); dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=hotmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of tatsuki_makino@hotmail.com designates 2a01:111:f400:febc::830 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=tatsuki_makino@hotmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.11 / 15.00]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[hotmail.com]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a01:111:f400::/48]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[hotmail.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[hotmail.com,none]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.63)[-0.627]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[2a01:111:f400:febc::830:from]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[hotmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:8075, ipnet:2a01:111:f000::/36, country:US]; ARC_ALLOW(-1.00)[microsoft.com:s=arcselector9901:i=1]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.98)[-0.984]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[hotmail.com:s=selector1]; FORGED_MUA_SEAMONKEY_MSGID_UNKNOWN(2.50)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[hotmail.com:dkim]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[2a01:111:f400:febc::830:from:127.0.2.255]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2a01:111:f400:febc::830:from]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-ports] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 May 2021 20:50:33 -0000 bob prohaska wrote on 2021/05/07 03:48: > [1881:100622:0506/112524.929414:ERROR:bus.cc(393)] Failed to connect to the bus: Failed to connect to socket /var/run/dbus/system_bus_socket: No such file or directory > [1881:100622:0506/112524.929991:ERROR:bus.cc(393)] Failed to connect to the bus: Failed to connect to socket /var/run/dbus/system_bus_socket: No such file or directory > [1881:100622:0506/112524.930610:ERROR:bus.cc(393)] Failed to connect to the bus: Failed to connect to socket /var/run/dbus/system_bus_socket: No such file or directory Maybe the dbus needs the session bus to be started? With a script like the one described in dbus-launch manpage. I have written the following in ~/.xinitrc. eval `dbus-launch --sh-syntax --exit-with-x11` Also, in the ssh -X shell, the following seems to be necessary. # The ENV SHELL has already been defined for this environment. eval `dbus-launch --auto-syntax --exit-with-session` Regards. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri May 7 00:29:17 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18592632BB1 for ; Fri, 7 May 2021 00:29:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd@www.zefox.net) Received: from www.zefox.net (www.zefox.net [50.1.20.27]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "www.zefox.com", Issuer "www.zefox.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Fbrt40cz4z3Fjn for ; Fri, 7 May 2021 00:29:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd@www.zefox.net) Received: from www.zefox.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by www.zefox.net (8.16.1/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 1470TG4N068677 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 6 May 2021 17:29:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fbsd@www.zefox.net) Received: (from fbsd@localhost) by www.zefox.net (8.16.1/8.15.2/Submit) id 1470TFG3068676; Thu, 6 May 2021 17:29:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fbsd) Date: Thu, 6 May 2021 17:29:15 -0700 From: bob prohaska To: Helge Oldach Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: www/chromium runs but drop down menu vanishes on Pi4 Message-ID: <20210507002915.GB67954@www.zefox.net> References: <20210506184856.GA67954@www.zefox.net> <202105062023.146KNjJb045712@nuc.oldach.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <202105062023.146KNjJb045712@nuc.oldach.net> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Fbrt40cz4z3Fjn X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of fbsd@www.zefox.net has no SPF policy when checking 50.1.20.27) smtp.mailfrom=fbsd@www.zefox.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.83 / 15.00]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; WWW_DOT_DOMAIN(0.50)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[zefox.net]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[50.1.20.27:from]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[50.1.20.27:from:127.0.2.255]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.73)[-0.733]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7065, ipnet:50.1.16.0/20, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-ports]; MID_RHS_WWW(0.50)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 May 2021 00:29:17 -0000 On Thu, May 06, 2021 at 10:23:45PM +0200, Helge Oldach wrote: > bob prohaska wrote on Thu, 06 May 2021 20:48:56 +0200 (CEST): > > On Sun, May 02, 2021 at 04:10:44PM +0000, bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org wrote: > > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246982 > > > > > > --- Comment #25 from Mikael Urankar --- > > > (In reply to Bob Prohaska from comment #24) > > > just update your ports tree. > > > > > > > The latest version of www/chromium compiled without a hitch on > > the Pi4, but drop-down controls menu (far right end of URL bar) > > won't stay dropped down when the browser is running on the console. > > This pretty recent twm fix based on PR 252873 perhaps? > > https://cgit.freebsd.org/ports/commit/x11-wm/twm?id=1c31059e3d1233fdbaee9b89ff041365f1710d17 > Yup, that fixed it! Thank you! bob prohaska > Kind regards > Helge > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri May 7 01:23:17 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB1496339FF for ; Fri, 7 May 2021 01:23:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yasu@utahime.org) Received: from maybe.home.utahime.org (gate.home.utahime.org [183.180.29.210]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Fbt4N6Ldlz3HYL for ; Fri, 7 May 2021 01:23:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yasu@utahime.org) Received: from eastasia.home.utahime.org (eastasia.home.utahime.org [192.168.174.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-384) server-digest SHA384) (No client certificate requested) by maybe.home.utahime.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 02D6A2842A for ; Fri, 7 May 2021 10:23:06 +0900 (JST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=utahime.org; s=maybe2019112701; t=1620350587; bh=I12YGhsP0Vb6v4V8KNqt7etfC00j/xbtbBFfqb16tNg=; h=Date:To:Subject:From:In-Reply-To:References; b=UCcXwWFtQ/Kc5etyz3+14tQInnlEQHYcRL9JvDBv4ElzX3Q0bMoquFLMePf6g4SP9 d1YkS5nUibjgTXPcNMy0MOXIu1aesTHTTfrlKOPpp8DD+76RqPzYtnUtKZgrVDBCpH oLP2ukCg7R0h1uhJpQ8bjnJo5aKh/bvjPPbmiXaf8GUDjRyCDHIsezErIgTBFvxeXN HP9fk2mH2bQWeUMEH2SBY3aCUxkxzZTMNXuRSM2mwlH2+hsg1RTJXywTDJiTvRqkZu mDro9IHlGR4JN0MSeovpcAaBXDPStXHYrPAIwql4wkhLf9xKJB+AJ551baLQGqRqWo JHCkzJgfKr/cw== Received: from localhost (rolling.home.utahime.org [192.168.174.11]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-384)) (No client certificate requested) by eastasia.home.utahime.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CDA482069B; Fri, 7 May 2021 10:23:05 +0900 (JST) X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.103.2 at eastasia.home.utahime.org Date: Fri, 07 May 2021 10:05:56 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20210507.100556.694097639001344220.yasu@utahime.org> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Making a port to use OpenSSL of ports collection on FreeBSD 11.x,Re: Making a port to use OpenSSL of ports collection on FreeBSD 11.x From: Yasuhiro Kimura In-Reply-To: <12e142be-43c8-70fc-d0d8-d17969d8c734@freebsd.org> References: <20210505173202.36f1c307@bsd64.grem.de> <20210506.010002.255215505975340477.yasu@utahime.org> <12e142be-43c8-70fc-d0d8-d17969d8c734@freebsd.org> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.8 on Emacs 27.2 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Fbt4N6Ldlz3HYL X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=utahime.org header.s=maybe2019112701 header.b=UCcXwWFt; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of yasu@utahime.org designates 183.180.29.210 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=yasu@utahime.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.70 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+a:spf-authorized.utahime.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; HFILTER_HELO_IP_A(1.00)[maybe.home.utahime.org]; HFILTER_HELO_NORES_A_OR_MX(0.30)[maybe.home.utahime.org]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[utahime.org:+]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[183.180.29.210:from]; ASN(0.00)[asn:2519, ipnet:183.180.0.0/16, country:JP]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[utahime.org:s=maybe2019112701]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[utahime.org]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[183.180.29.210:from:127.0.2.255]; MID_CONTAINS_FROM(1.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-ports] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 May 2021 01:23:17 -0000 From: Stefan Esser Subject: Re: Making a port to use OpenSSL of ports collection on FreeBSD 11.x,Re: Making a port to use OpenSSL of ports collection on FreeBSD 11.x Date: Wed, 5 May 2021 18:55:47 +0200 >> You misunderstand my intention. What I would like to do is to make a >> port use security/openssl instead of base OpenSSL even if user sets >> 'DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=ssl=base' in /etc/make.conf (or user doesn't >> customize setting about ssl at all). > > You can mark the port as broken if the user has selected "base" and > this is incompatible with the port's requirements. E.g.: > > .include > > .if ${SSL_DEFAULT} == base > BROKEN_FreeBSD_11= OpenSSL 1.1 required > .endif > > .include > > You can of course add a better message, and the user can decide to > try the compilation again after changing the default. But this will > of course prevent the building of official packages for FreeBSD-11. > >> As I wrote previous mail, if 'USES=python:3.8+' is specified in >> Makefile of a port, lang/python38 is used for the port event if user >> adds 'DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=python=3.7' in /etc/make.conf. I'm looking for >> similar way about ssl setting. > > You could add a dependency on the openssl port and make sure, that > the port's include file and library is used in preference of the > base version on FreeBSD-11. > > But you have to consider the risk of mixing references to the base and > the ports version in one binary (e.g. other libraries are linked in that > had been built against the base version). Thank you for explanation. The risk certainly cannot be ignored. So the best practice is 1. Mark BROKEN if system is FreeBSD 11.x and SSL_DEFAULT is base. 2. For uses who want to used a port on FreeBSD 11.x with base OpenSSL, copy it to other name before updating it. And before I came to this conclusion, I noticed that the port in question was already updated exactly this way;-). --- Yasuhiro Kimura From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri May 7 17:32:55 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 291666369DE for ; Fri, 7 May 2021 17:32:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bofh@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FcHbC0cKxz4tHL for ; Fri, 7 May 2021 17:32:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bofh@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 14F75636AB1; Fri, 7 May 2021 17:32:55 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14BF3636A3E for ; Fri, 7 May 2021 17:32:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bofh@freebsd.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [96.47.72.83]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FcHbC071dz4tN8 for ; Fri, 7 May 2021 17:32:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bofh@freebsd.org) Received: from mx.bofh.network (mx.bofh.network [IPv6:2a01:4f8:13b:4347::12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx.bofh.network", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) (Authenticated sender: bofh/mail) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A68BB7AA4 for ; Fri, 7 May 2021 17:32:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bofh@freebsd.org) Received: from smtpclient.apple (103-218-25-250.Dhaka.carnival.com.bd [103.218.25.250]) by mx.bofh.network (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 849d9060 (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO) for ; Fri, 7 May 2021 17:32:52 +0000 (UTC) From: Muhammad Moinur Rahman Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_D3E06363-E16F-41C6-9480-F11303BE67AA"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.80.0.2.43\)) Subject: Preferred way of repocopy in terms of git Message-Id: <953F2827-FE7C-4286-B6D5-867382A436C7@freebsd.org> Date: Fri, 7 May 2021 23:32:48 +0600 To: "ports@freebsd.org" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.80.0.2.43) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 May 2021 17:32:55 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_D3E06363-E16F-41C6-9480-F11303BE67AA Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Hi, What is the preferred way of doing ports repocopy in git? In the hard = way I can see moving it into two locations and merging them. But is = there any easier way of doing it? Kind Regards, Moin --Apple-Mail=_D3E06363-E16F-41C6-9480-F11303BE67AA Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQKTBAEBCgB9FiEETfdREoUGjQZKBS+fvbm1phfAvJEFAmCVecFfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDRE Rjc1MTEyODUwNjhEMDY0QTA1MkY5RkJEQjlCNUE2MTdDMEJDOTEACgkQvbm1phfA vJEERQ/9Hp6HPLbJWpzjvlKURo9HyQA2gRMAuHsY7JcxIrQrk7JX6g+Mrfom2hN/ eyE/4CBI70f6n6ivdMC7xzOustbXmt18n9yoSuVzff80wMFYIoV4bEF3GbNAawXy zmfIrE3t/8cvmb2YK1hNBeEOuOFVWeKZL6fHY8RL2B4XL10/YOXeVe3fEWPUE1sc wTJ6hNjiO72Yx4SqJ5K3gUip1bz0hInjECuChaZhsu4LfCg9zuSkIKGUiogwMt1P GOc9F1HEBlSNx/ZByxMuyvfHOrVNWUVU0EZIu+Oy4K3+HDQOHbpSofVyVYITIiQQ +Rg1CvEsSzH19RETA3p5VyIS8+QuDQiCwclOxkfLn5lvtC2hGa572B+Q4/qa3xgS a/X2eyqjLlOJqrCOPWiC5XdZAfZh8kG0MZLZ9C6jxJKGqGpMhEU2mJ/mMCHaUjmh 1JIzNBCsbVibU2JeMKVvtveC+aU1ncxsC1xqWQYBbR0VjUGDnqsFjvHkP/brKHMR DaZlb9y2SCnfMB/X6HtjPQPoYxVzD1YwElPvi8ngPg1SdP05r3QbGKY7IDuzlV3h 9V+Y7uRxzmHI1n7F4rFkFPIXYtpwiqpybb29kxas9gp9TeikfqpMO6H0aP+GvzLT CGg8UpW38UtqwCdXBrF45y2EsEAjY2hiHVhvMhmvCpuWZQiWRoU= =vfIQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_D3E06363-E16F-41C6-9480-F11303BE67AA-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat May 8 08:05:33 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F93D62C9F2 for ; Sat, 8 May 2021 08:05:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from njm@njm.me.uk) Received: from smtp001-out.apm-internet.net (smtp001-out.apm-internet.net [85.119.248.222]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Fcfy42dSxz4csp for ; Sat, 8 May 2021 08:05:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from njm@njm.me.uk) Received: (qmail 7021 invoked from network); 8 May 2021 08:05:29 -0000 X-APM-Out-ID: 16204611290701 X-APM-Authkey: 18389/1(18389/1) 2 Received: from unknown (HELO meld.njm.me.uk) (86.179.69.31) by smtp001.apm-internet.net with SMTP; 8 May 2021 08:05:29 -0000 Received: from triton.njm.me.uk (triton.njm.me.uk [192.168.144.133]) by meld.njm.me.uk (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPS id 14885TRJ087091 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Sat, 8 May 2021 09:05:29 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from njm@njm.me.uk) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by triton.njm.me.uk (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTP id 14885SgK045716 for ; Sat, 8 May 2021 09:05:28 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from njm@njm.me.uk) Date: Sat, 08 May 2021 09:05:28 +0100 From: "N.J. Mann" To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: [SOLVED] Re: Problems with gitup - doesn't delete files / old ports. Message-ID: <91B9D61A96D29C220DEDE756@triton.njm.me.uk> In-Reply-To: <2B71581BA1C1C9DBE6F3CDF3@triton.njm.me.uk> References: <2B71581BA1C1C9DBE6F3CDF3@triton.njm.me.uk> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Fcfy42dSxz4csp X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of njm@njm.me.uk has no SPF policy when checking 85.119.248.222) smtp.mailfrom=njm@njm.me.uk X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.20 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[85.119.248.222:from]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[85.119.248.222:from:127.0.2.255]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[njm.me.uk]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:35259, ipnet:85.119.248.0/21, country:GB]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-ports]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[85.119.248.222:from] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 May 2021 08:05:33 -0000 Hi, On Saturday, April 24, 2021 I wrote: > > I have been using gitup for just over a week (and before that svn and > before that cvsup) to update a local ports tree. I have encountered > some annoying failures. [...] With the help of John Mehr and the folks of freebsd-fs@ we got to the bottom of the issue. The problem only occurred when /usr/ports was NFS mounted and a small change to gitup fixed this. This fix is now in the FreeBSD ports tree: commit 8ec1455f5301f5addb88de8458c9a56784ed57dd Regards, Nick. -- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu May 6 19:46:51 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB36C62C2E5 for ; Thu, 6 May 2021 19:46:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from web@3dresearch.com) Received: from smtpg.telissant.net (smtpg.telissant.net [104.225.1.73]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FbkcB3G6Dz512C; Thu, 6 May 2021 19:46:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from web@3dresearch.com) Received: from sacada.3dresearch.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtpg.telissant.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Fbkc937QBz2D1r8; Thu, 6 May 2021 15:46:49 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at telissant.net Received: from smtpg.telissant.net ([127.0.0.1]) by sacada.3dresearch.com (sacada.3dresearch.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aQS5m4tuTVoh; Thu, 6 May 2021 15:46:49 -0400 (EDT) Received: from buffrescue.3dresearch.com (unknown [71.112.245.111]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: buffrescue@sacada.3dresearch.com) by smtpg.telissant.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4Fbkc86tRwz2D1r7; Thu, 6 May 2021 15:46:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: from buffrescue.3dresearch.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by buffrescue.3dresearch.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 4CF0B613CF; Thu, 6 May 2021 15:46:48 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 6 May 2021 15:46:42 -0400 From: Janos Dohanics To: Jan Beich Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: graphics/wayland error: unknown argument: '-fno-color-diagnostics' Message-Id: <20210506154642.371cedd34b937df23f691770@3dresearch.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20210505234136.f5ba7d7047125a213b07880a@3dresearch.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.33; amd64-portbld-freebsd12.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FbkcB3G6Dz512C X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of web@3dresearch.com designates 104.225.1.73 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=web@3dresearch.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.80 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ENVFROM_SERVICE_ACCT(1.00)[]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+a:smtpg.telissant.net]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[71.112.245.111:received]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[104.225.1.73:from]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:36236, ipnet:104.225.1.0/24, country:US]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; RCVD_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[3dresearch.com]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[104.225.1.73:from:127.0.2.255]; FROM_SERVICE_ACCT(1.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-ports] X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 08 May 2021 08:50:25 +0000 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 May 2021 19:46:52 -0000 On Thu, 06 May 2021 21:20:55 +0200 Jan Beich wrote: > Janos Dohanics writes: > > > Hello, > > > > trying to build graphics/wayland on a newly installed system > > (FreeBSD 13.0-STABLE #0 stable/13-n245524-11af9a9cf93: Wed May 5 > > 17:58:25 EDT 2021): > > > > https://pastebin.com/mdK0yscg > > > > Would you please advise? > > Did you partially upgrade? devel/meson was fixed at the same time > colors were force-disabled for USES=meson consumers. > > https://cgit.freebsd.org/ports/commit/?id=ff2796d5bc83 That was it; after updating devel/meson graphics/wayland built fine. Thank you for your help! -- Janos Dohanics From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat May 8 09:09:16 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89A9062E843 for ; Sat, 8 May 2021 09:09:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FchMc3SGJz4gQT for ; Sat, 8 May 2021 09:09:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 769FF62EB0C; Sat, 8 May 2021 09:09:16 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 766F762EB96 for ; Sat, 8 May 2021 09:09:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FchMc2yMMz4gl7 for ; Sat, 8 May 2021 09:09:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (portscout.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 58D431BF45 for ; Sat, 8 May 2021 09:09:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.nyi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.10]) by portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 14899Gne072405 for ; Sat, 8 May 2021 09:09:16 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 14899GVk072397; Sat, 8 May 2021 09:09:16 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <202105080909.14899GVk072397@portscout.nyi.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.nyi.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sat, 8 May 2021 09:09:16 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 May 2021 09:09:16 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ devel/d-feet | 0.3.15 | 0.3.16 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Reported by: portscout! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat May 8 09:46:11 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9998262F831 for ; Sat, 8 May 2021 09:46:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from simon.wright@gmx.net) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.20]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mout.gmx.net", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass Class 2 CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FcjBB1cvqz4jD8 for ; Sat, 8 May 2021 09:46:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from simon.wright@gmx.net) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1620467168; bh=EE7TMNS3Dz40+Clp/rSEDC1wAEx/LBIfnX3Fca3gICE=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:To:From:Subject:Date; b=DaGBUvnhLUP/JXtDgtg1Gd1zhQztkHLIThW5Qh4gAtlLcqOeo8a8VKt058ied5tTU QaFxUkpjWoG0NnsmFQMWMFXGceArMEAg4g4T/66sPqtAe9YQX7D9cQtK8cuAr4yAcc 88R9tt9wSGbL14X0TQIVNbxf+29iIPZxsXnQ7UuY= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Received: from [192.168.79.199] ([110.54.187.195]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx104 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1N1wpt-1lZ59y2gx7-012EgG for ; Sat, 08 May 2021 11:46:08 +0200 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: Simon Wright Subject: Additional filtering on pkg-status.freebsd.org url Message-ID: <7c61b8df-2965-2744-65b3-12bea2475c85@gmx.net> Date: Sat, 8 May 2021 17:46:03 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.8.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:DBx7/Y3HXI/dSJFO0XYSGvluTwhLy5+pijWxriQdhpmNBpiHLD2 T7AzK7m/whxyChnkiL1jsneM/5E6pH06NDhEx9Lr5fYGz2N7TrCtmoiHMmrF7dDWiD/UcKc G2fQIdVZu2iUV44V0mD8J1m8Xe85RWeQPowEYVrjJ+i5Y3J6w9EGfA27dOIpp1H++l5THdo PdqnLHIuSOXJMtQ1ztpRA== X-Spam-Flag: NO X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:OQywNSR/ZQg=:/7WISTCB9fpcGWeqWsaIJm yLZgEe737XT01eXhBtNsbmwSsXmCsyRr4NQlur5GcUEB94cKCeO74kzwEe77Ec4MUxYQiKQLq aPiPurXA5NFF0sOE5ORukpElpGn4i6hniuWHTDhjEiYdPgLJeIWVxUWxNVxQ9N+5wGRscVL9I SXr3G8FJSgnjdCkuMtoclp8sd5lzLXyqg1qvVB8WueGxUkmXlijIatSb0osmaq6Zh7Lyeye3s eNGhFIiRa4bjYhhoPMuqTUxBftSz5JG/Wvper2S2ZS54F1i0tE6kRzn4u6/Vf7fGBg4dkr887 l0Aef3Y7MTlzeZPXBH3DYfYxJxNrtLkXbLhFw/KbUBtVEaRxK0rOWKAdc7R06sLSwIxUHW0tH Yawba2SmAgZcKofrCw1tI0mmN4QKvWUV5vLQ4XCbaATcRbhE2YLVPawRaGFwvcDJSacFl1Yk6 qBM6jdKFuEQGo2oBQekmOHwMZQuUSh6Ed6lstY1TZh1LSpLtwqmfcWAMpLDuOeqy+HEXByNKy aM0ZLFyO09a+uBLSDRpgW0kKym2/lfh6tUW1sw/8fX2fJ9ZLKZT5SrFQ1mo8Ue7ZMhLxXNYkj mPJ2IFjpkdZSSl9c2wXhj2rt3uVdB5oWAboy4LBqT/KGFUG6cEyCgpzDse3Fpb4y10d+fOn0g 4LMJ9TMRmkWfGwvybNt/cqQ0psi3TDwaxUPLwIBnjcE7ceX9FJ0vCCarm8ADgeRnytTh7FLAt LZM9fz91hrGP1poIATA5T6DCPu6E0B4OZUqQDmYHdnvS6WvQ4GTLqcBg9N7S3csz+1Yxm/o0Z ammpyvwlOfnXHAjcFn0naW0Ifw7b+Mv68uU+WEyGPcyPvjeDmnwQo5LUODI1F4R/gF0ueHtCJ GglZmqEqLjqxihVf/sZPA9qACOjPD3bcnhYKJEDBH5CK2ge22VyRPqWr9pIYbo23n+g5ucN38 8DrGYNT1kHYNU+QUgfDSuB4ysB2HVP5k29QQaKrVfUHw0xXzeus+0axFvlkSFzoI0ODtRuAI1 NTH8Bq4/TqMR5EvpCdaUozYTeJeKMdq9FnE+QFkM+KCUan0QY7X7hVUYMvnIqFDbgC0EUTUea GWefRzfKQ8lqU7SgjHGL2jROmHS2GmJ70gywfurNT1R6H5YqXepwdznhcYCKtk7FaNQ+Z48JG 3fjhQgLiBx72/7vMETn4pf9AGnAz5TtPIWLSmrDKskkPbnt1ntyWBZmSG4slO+sOmCoB0= X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FcjBB1cvqz4jD8 X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmx.net header.s=badeba3b8450 header.b=DaGBUvnh; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmx.net; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of simon.wright@gmx.net designates 212.227.17.20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=simon.wright@gmx.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.10 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmx.net]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:212.227.17.0/27]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmx.net:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmx.net,none]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[212.227.17.20:from]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[212.227.17.20:from]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmx.net]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:8560, ipnet:212.227.0.0/16, country:DE]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmx.net:s=badeba3b8450]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[110.54.187.195:received]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmx.net:dkim]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[212.227.17.20:from:127.0.2.255]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[212.227.17.20:from]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-ports] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 May 2021 09:46:11 -0000 Hi all, The move to git for ports is more or less OK for me now, thanks to several for the various pointers. I still have issues with accessing the individual build machine due to IPv6 issues on my side so am using pkg-status.freebsd.org to check the status of the build cluster rather than the specific machine that is building for my desired architecture. My (minor) issue now is that accessing: https://pkg-status.freebsd.org/builds?type=3Dpackage gives me a long list of builds. I'm looking for a way to pass a search string of '130amd64' in the URL so that I can go straight to the builds that I'm interested in. Is this possible? Encoding AND Search=3D'130amd64' in the URL does not work. Can anyone point me in the right direction for this? Thanks, Simon Wright. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat May 8 09:54:13 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B2B162FE21 for ; Sat, 8 May 2021 09:54:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@grem.de) Received: from mail.evolve.de (mail.evolve.de [213.239.217.29]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA512 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mail.evolve.de", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FcjMS2q8yz4jfj for ; Sat, 8 May 2021 09:54:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@grem.de) Received: by mail.evolve.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 55671bc8; Sat, 8 May 2021 09:54:07 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=grem.de; h=date:from:to:cc :subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=20180501; bh=e5/EAZXv j4TrEol420fol1d+qKI=; b=p8UWURldTzY//xRKYOAy93XWBGlKwbgPBVBC30JB 22a5ra6klMbEHTYcd7Y5nFEqSq/DDZTwqymP7wcLseyum8pOhoMaNob78Sr327Bd GjBdW+61NOQU1YplmMdaBw/yoJ4BgeClynp4FkdKoQygeNro8Hyq1BXsS16Z9ULp NQhAzVONACdlduoN3/Zdhn/2xl42oawIH2y216RBxCv8ZlwzXRIRNK7zhcOoUZ3k DggXul3xVxzjn90yULuQIjnC+9bEEZI/qTUV8kXAshDEK/4xzYvVyYEVtLQchQTB XBchMoAlUwS4uP8oD5c2YUqMtwKD6m87vYIfT7e0Mi2idQ== DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=grem.de; h=date:from:to:cc :subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=20180501; b=s6 EkXG5F+w8T5+eoW0QMWNimHsKMXCykj1hCzTMC0iMWLJQzh2jrrsB3NovDI1kjMq RV1hMeiAAGWO4CrUSchlswqfQGLsuPgZib+JyJJ2TP6Kpcej9ujAtMhsXnx8OTgq U3ffC4uormaeyyEbNxOx8tDpY/dtLyN55CLJ5u/KQiOlk7m+gJQzgkMAZct4/SWZ 92R30gqitgTnbQTU4yg7phu5pJRKK2WilZKDNT/eYhl1JLp006ua+o8YPmbBYM+H NrTbTpdJKm+JM16cSGgJkp7E/oMq5h4gCqyBq1mNr3+vkp3vZ/V839t5HJrcWMdo vT83vMq6tQlHRVavE3zA== Received: by mail.evolve.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 754a8ed7 (TLSv1.3:AEAD-CHACHA20-POLY1305-SHA256:256:NO); Sat, 8 May 2021 09:54:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 8 May 2021 11:53:54 +0200 From: Michael Gmelin To: Simon Wright Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Additional filtering on pkg-status.freebsd.org url Message-ID: <20210508115354.6fef41cc@bsd64.grem.de> In-Reply-To: <7c61b8df-2965-2744-65b3-12bea2475c85@gmx.net> References: <7c61b8df-2965-2744-65b3-12bea2475c85@gmx.net> X-Face: $wrgCtfdVw_H9WAY?S&9+/F"!41z'L$uo*WzT8miX?kZ~W~Lr5W7v?j0Sde\mwB&/ypo^}> +a'4xMc^^KroE~+v^&^#[B">soBo1y6(TW6#UZiC]o>C6`ej+i Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAJFBMVEWJBwe5BQDl LASZU0/LTEWEfHbyj0Txi32+sKrp1Mv944X8/fm1rS+cAAAACXBIWXMAAAsTAAAL EwEAmpwYAAAAB3RJTUUH3wESCxwC7OBhbgAAACFpVFh0Q29tbWVudAAAAAAAQ3Jl YXRlZCB3aXRoIFRoZSBHSU1QbbCXAAAAAghJREFUOMu11DFvEzEUAGCfEhBVFzuq AKkLd0O6VrIQsLXVSZXoWE5N1K3DobBBA9fQpRWc8OkWouaIjedWKiyREOKs+3PY fvalCNjgLVHeF7/3bMtBzV8C/VsQ8tecEgCcDgrzjekwKZ7TwsJZd/ywEKwwP+ZM 8P3drTsAwWn2mpWuDDuYiK1bFs6De0KUUFw0tWxm+D4AIhuuvZqtyWYeO7jQ4Aea 7jUqI+ixhQoHex4WshEvSXdood7stlv4oSuFOC4tqGcr0NjEqXgV4mMJO38nld4+ xKNxRDon7khyKVqY7YR4d+Cg0OMrkWXZOM7YDkEfKiilCn1qYv4mighZiynuHHOA Wq9QJq+BIES7lMFUtcikMnkDGHUoncA+uHgrP0ctIEqfwLHzeSo+eUA66AqzwN6n 2ZHJhw6Qh/PoyC/QENyEyC/AyNjq74Bs+3UH0xYwzDUC4B97HgLocg1QLYgDDO1v f3UX9Y307Ew4AHh67YAFFsxEpkXwpXY3eIgMhAAE3R19L919nNnuD2wlPcDE3UeT L2ytEICQib9BXgS2fU8PrD82ToYO1OEmMSnYTjSqSv9wdC0tPYC+rQRQD9ESnldF CyqfmiYW+tlALt8gH2xrMdC/youbjzPXEun+/ReXsMCDyve3dZc09fn2Oas8oXGc Jj6/fOeK5UmSMPmf/jL+GD8BEj0k/Fn6IO4AAAAASUVORK5CYII= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FcjMS2q8yz4jfj X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=grem.de header.s=20180501 header.b=p8UWURld; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of freebsd@grem.de designates 213.239.217.29 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=freebsd@grem.de X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.50 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[grem.de:s=20180501]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:213.239.217.29/32]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[grem.de]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[213.239.217.29:from:127.0.2.255]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[grem.de:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-0.998]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[gmx.net]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[213.239.217.29:from]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:213.239.192.0/18, country:DE]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-ports] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 May 2021 09:54:13 -0000 On Sat, 8 May 2021 17:46:03 +0800 Simon Wright wrote: > Hi all, > > The move to git for ports is more or less OK for me now, thanks to > several for the various pointers. I still have issues with accessing > the individual build machine due to IPv6 issues on my side so am using > pkg-status.freebsd.org to check the status of the build cluster rather > than the specific machine that is building for my desired > architecture. > > My (minor) issue now is that accessing: > > https://pkg-status.freebsd.org/builds?type=package > > gives me a long list of builds. I'm looking for a way to pass a search > string of '130amd64' in the URL so that I can go straight to the > builds that I'm interested in. Is this possible? Encoding > > AND Search='130amd64' > > in the URL does not work. Can anyone point me in the right direction > for this? Does this show what you want? https://pkg-status.freebsd.org/builds?jailname=130amd64&type=package Best > > Thanks, > > Simon Wright. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Michael Gmelin From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat May 8 09:57:22 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95B1D63002B for ; Sat, 8 May 2021 09:57:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from simon.wright@gmx.net) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.20]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mout.gmx.net", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass Class 2 CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FcjR53GCrz4jdN for ; Sat, 8 May 2021 09:57:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from simon.wright@gmx.net) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1620467840; bh=UDKAEe4W9BALttLxdsH+Ye6aH95urnxSUhnBBKcoq9Q=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=Cpz7yz+APZIbkrrRZef7w7P3FNKGyOdQ8VCFzZzXCsOYlzqnhsT5dF/wqWk/Uyk8t 3ECbGVQBcVnvcL9q2JpylxdeXy3G7SLPTkhWOr3lLET2CKhgjX/+4eCDOJjvkJSU/W B0U2uN2iXsCrEMR0pPhWB9u/5MqVeaop/6n4mEJ4= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Received: from [192.168.79.199] ([110.54.187.195]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx104 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1N5GE1-1lVjT81SQn-0117uQ for ; Sat, 08 May 2021 11:57:19 +0200 Subject: Re: Additional filtering on pkg-status.freebsd.org url To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <7c61b8df-2965-2744-65b3-12bea2475c85@gmx.net> <20210508115354.6fef41cc@bsd64.grem.de> From: Simon Wright Message-ID: Date: Sat, 8 May 2021 17:57:15 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.8.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210508115354.6fef41cc@bsd64.grem.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:lLDRQYwiDfiOBy2AH/9lZmoN4vxe2xTC4tlTCjtkQy6dLh0ZexC eD2BJ1pLzn3lH7cyla9WQCWmb9aoLXVUAem6npJ0qz0Chbq0PHb7ADBuUAcOyuVgM9ckPQW uJY5AlW5IP8O5mj7Q8HIAoD9UNPe0TfVI7nOrJ4q2TlgNv9nIAx+f7hgZkSkcan72PU3TOh 7p0hujF10r83r0nMUv8Gg== X-Spam-Flag: NO X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:Grfxzk8zB9s=:sl3X94fmP+lTGwPiuIaTu2 RG+8l1xZs0hsN4FyTqG2IgDYVBHqJQGjCCJnsv6RzFhwwqXsjCiHNFOaoGyvLh9hbRPE+TWGs o0HmvNE9YzZUnrlQOabHRKWvkHcG8PM1tADqoUxk3oOyd0T/lxigABt/MwNXEpOESFya22Be6 /5cgWRna3QMJMxPrIwY6cHN38suiwvKBPH/ACVbDuPMd9Q60qDYBo94PSzNtkd16TADXoM+Z4 JO6M6OpLa50tsNYSgWu1CilqKjtPpvwZlOatG5Dj6RnSuRdsgwu3GATi7ZfkN35+IjLMOKe14 c7m3HO6wx8RoRfyTepbdnM1gvERKFn4o7OzQ6OoFuCHjq5Lesq7lXtNO4HDpcMiWApO1hYLGj IimvKO5Sw+Vp+5OneKNL320XZotwxh1TgLhhBT/NYqTWjKy8+ibJ/y+5MbB8Tf+AzUbyYekHK Fx+UpjjPvPn3Dat+fkn+Jx7G5DrY5H7hKDGEMRgI/TDOYo9ExLcBnoJxw53OmrdIJHy2/cax3 lrg2Icxzjrd2A605L6LJfNJK22qGQT4+daJv9PkqOJToIsw2C0wjwGAvYNxTgmlQW0f3XbdZ8 2jpD2oxHhfSdw0bawgqoN133RYFVx1nnG0fE2pGSPFGdiiuMYjGShsGbDqXPz9Gu6jLvgsgOl 54KW83cc0IiVhpmeHJ4IUJvA5zIAkRAbqVSuu93DNlOeCB/A+xJ+KDx/YKWuv/M7ngJz/0B20 Qj1gE5lkvg389qGbGlk5yszXvSR96dpnrDa2skrKUpccOxYB2aqKWMdg1H0xN5141WU0dZ4ur 1WSdDF6Q5hH21Dhh/WTe6c1q9jbJvrUJWUuew6LYzeqAu/+22yRYp1iuAg07imTHdqOv8Vdgi WUjnW4qeeTiG/p+CMCs+PGpVeJ9fhyozBizYcaDgSVF2wmJnN7HHDvPrGIKyg1jOU2iwp3ZAm pB4qV5CkZRQDCQJ3GEnf8y8JJmQBX+La8GHZHFllXmgcWX3In2PpJASoZZKq159auL8TxPN9N feiVEsBjH8O8ehzv04NHLhCPACEak8e7+z2YSf9K8tnlN7GllK+vWKAdkXomyH9o3qJgLOrgV pj8+R95iJ9y65eSJPvo/pQFKXesFkdH6zhyUbMJvPu4KA5mpMQUGbwSF9KEoz7IjHUzEoSLsB ldEF8AT0wGTRkn4Zfhy/OU6ZNpFOzn189U+j0CoBiwSWhyl6FTzAVnbPR2dcIlWWlWSc8= X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FcjR53GCrz4jdN X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmx.net header.s=badeba3b8450 header.b=Cpz7yz+A; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmx.net; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of simon.wright@gmx.net designates 212.227.17.20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=simon.wright@gmx.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.10 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmx.net]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:212.227.17.0/27]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmx.net:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmx.net,none]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[212.227.17.20:from]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmx.net]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[212.227.17.20:from]; ASN(0.00)[asn:8560, ipnet:212.227.0.0/16, country:DE]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmx.net:dkim]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmx.net:s=badeba3b8450]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[110.54.187.195:received]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[212.227.17.20:from:127.0.2.255]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[212.227.17.20:from]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-ports] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 May 2021 09:57:22 -0000 Totally perfect. Thank you Michael :). On 08/05/2021 5:53 pm, Michael Gmelin wrote: > > > On Sat, 8 May 2021 17:46:03 +0800 > Simon Wright wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> The move to git for ports is more or less OK for me now, thanks to >> several for the various pointers. I still have issues with accessing >> the individual build machine due to IPv6 issues on my side so am using >> pkg-status.freebsd.org to check the status of the build cluster rather >> than the specific machine that is building for my desired >> architecture. >> >> My (minor) issue now is that accessing: >> >> https://pkg-status.freebsd.org/builds?type=3Dpackage >> >> gives me a long list of builds. I'm looking for a way to pass a search >> string of '130amd64' in the URL so that I can go straight to the >> builds that I'm interested in. Is this possible? Encoding >> >> AND Search=3D'130amd64' >> >> in the URL does not work. Can anyone point me in the right direction >> for this? > > Does this show what you want? > > https://pkg-status.freebsd.org/builds?jailname=3D130amd64&type=3Dpackage > > Best > >> >> Thanks, >> >> Simon Wright. >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list >> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > >