From nobody Mon Aug 23 15:27:33 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D64641789262 for ; Mon, 23 Aug 2021 15:27:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd@www.zefox.net) Received: from www.zefox.net (www.zefox.net [50.1.20.27]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "www.zefox.com", Issuer "www.zefox.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Gtbhm4SSFz4t7m for ; Mon, 23 Aug 2021 15:27:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd@www.zefox.net) Received: from www.zefox.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by www.zefox.net (8.16.1/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 17NFRYk0013717 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 23 Aug 2021 08:27:34 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fbsd@www.zefox.net) Received: (from fbsd@localhost) by www.zefox.net (8.16.1/8.15.2/Submit) id 17NFRXoe013716 for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Mon, 23 Aug 2021 08:27:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fbsd) Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2021 08:27:33 -0700 From: bob prohaska To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Controlling python when building www/chromium Message-ID: <20210823152733.GA13247@www.zefox.net> List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Gtbhm4SSFz4t7m X-Spamd-Bar: ++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of fbsd@www.zefox.net has no SPF policy when checking 50.1.20.27) smtp.mailfrom=fbsd@www.zefox.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [2.90 / 15.00]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; WWW_DOT_DOMAIN(0.50)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(1.00)[1.000]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[zefox.net]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(1.00)[1.000]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7065, ipnet:50.1.16.0/20, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MID_RHS_WWW(0.50)[] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N When trying to build www/chromium on a 1 GB Pi3 the system gets bogged down by five instances of python2.7 running simultaneously. This happens using both poudriere and make. It wasn't a problem a year ago, so presumably something has changed in chromium's internal build machinery. I've searched https://www.chromium.org/developers/how-tos/get-the-code and https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/chromium-dev but couldn't find any references to python when compiling, only when running the browser. Is there some way to control how many pythons are loosed at one time? Most likely two could be accomodated, possibly three. On an 8 GB Pi4 the five pythons coexist happily, so the behavior is probably not considered a bug. Thanks for reading, bob prohaska From nobody Mon Aug 23 21:02:42 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C9481787DCF for ; Mon, 23 Aug 2021 21:02:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eduardo@freebsd.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::24b:4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Gtl7f0pbGz4fMJ for ; Mon, 23 Aug 2021 21:02:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eduardo@freebsd.org) Received: from mail-ed1-f41.google.com (mail-ed1-f41.google.com [209.85.208.41]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) (Authenticated sender: eduardo) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F2D462178F for ; Mon, 23 Aug 2021 21:02:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eduardo@freebsd.org) Received: by mail-ed1-f41.google.com with SMTP id r19so28192650eds.13 for ; Mon, 23 Aug 2021 14:02:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533v2PYjQCF/ErzwgMWNq2E5BCATKmh1QaZaGscsUcPUxR+wsI4T cLyNnh9NXYHbNYopktK074tn7LoruVpKoW4mao4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxzWd/83FwP+ahbeQN5mNXPzHZ1ipVwlHZ60ytFi9lnWr20lflymJLp5hsDfQ8rHjzYlMhvVqiG70+NbksID/c= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:4387:: with SMTP id o7mr39214820edc.204.1629752572772; Mon, 23 Aug 2021 14:02:52 -0700 (PDT) List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Nuno Teixeira Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2021 22:02:42 +0100 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Help needed on a possible multiple ports maintainer reset To: FreeBSD Mailing List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000002c076505ca4057cc" X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: Y --0000000000002c076505ca4057cc Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hello! I'm an young committer and I found this PR interesting because of a possible multiple ports maintainer reset so other people could adopt port unmaintained. Need some experienced committer that takes a look and give some advice about maintaner reset. Thanks, Nuno Teixeita --0000000000002c076505ca4057cc-- From nobody Tue Aug 24 06:14:38 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF451178D2BD for ; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 06:14:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fernando.apesteguia@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yb1-xb34.google.com (mail-yb1-xb34.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b34]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4GtzNV4X85z4hbh; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 06:14:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fernando.apesteguia@gmail.com) Received: by mail-yb1-xb34.google.com with SMTP id a93so38899716ybi.1; Mon, 23 Aug 2021 23:14:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=CDBW+2vRStUaSsXm0d2tk+Rr7dKyuMU2/3vdXiQU8A8=; b=rchZDK9P9PLekom6fi8y1FPnoS5LRLzUMzbP4RoF975g4P4ccIHSnbbme8D6X/+Wrh cSHdTQrzDBxab/EVBwKggFmVLAOmSak/PYVG0x5mCoRsq2dkp4f1yiiJm1KaYIUfOmOk fS1IjfpsfPtLNh4658xtiTTAjqhHa6VBe9IIoZ1YBk2Z7jUnQuVM4QFgkTLlMR292x8J D54Scy+GCWr4tM3FxGBGwxOVRYIQaDqCuLOWweXr5XTYP85v2V3HfL8xBbPaBxQ6VbiA BqVb961iCc3TGwimdSXzZfRFKWWHWewLjd7Gn9xorgdCXVx26btmf/WfVnrik3kQmxW4 zHbA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=CDBW+2vRStUaSsXm0d2tk+Rr7dKyuMU2/3vdXiQU8A8=; b=K4J5d+/XbOgQ4rf1jeV3sUNXijmrfEVPEs4OvSQb4zcdITH7TIA5u0UvCBH33YwOm+ 4VBxU730hTpcxDsAgUnBvwWdQNGbmJ1zXq+PHj5lJwiEIB+UEFD6AEe7NkpvZ0sgvHNi egQohdmBNLqL9feygGWRgEjyviRETumtsNFYxkTjQIL/HZb6WaX8c0THFVQ0LFGVLtxA 0PDq/7A4+aMU3VhCRwF6o/EN/6tyLQEMlGmVYBrKf8xfHGZodGazVrasKaQJUKzFH5MG t/9+tSbrFLFo19M6mw/n3Vkue0iR98Yi8aY69c+JfTA8URFFHFcR32UGbl4esuyFSrP1 dSIw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530wtBCSEkD24ewGtkAPQjNBcS6xKoEkk+v3amUoBboqgEUvhpaZ ev5qpyrKVqdbwjierDwcWc3EO9me0z0/w8BTD0poWEIo X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxVbQk4aPK6DZQbTk/Z+4rI8/SB0qmlqFYH1ZftPWdnwl5LcEKgKaOF+SOyRPzNG5uri6fF5W/RUSO7wQAgPGM= X-Received: by 2002:a25:bc0f:: with SMTP id i15mr49599668ybh.233.1629785690038; Mon, 23 Aug 2021 23:14:50 -0700 (PDT) List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: =?UTF-8?Q?Fernando_Apestegu=C3=ADa?= Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2021 08:14:38 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Help needed on a possible multiple ports maintainer reset To: Nuno Teixeira Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000001d65e505ca480d92" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4GtzNV4X85z4hbh X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-Spam: Yes X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: Y --0000000000001d65e505ca480d92 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable El lun., 23 ago. 2021 23:03, Nuno Teixeira escribi=C3= =B3: > Hello! > > I'm an young committer and I found this PR > interesting > because of a possible multiple ports maintainer reset so other people cou= ld > adopt port unmaintained. > > Need some experienced committer that takes a look and give some advice > about maintaner reset. > Hi Nuno, Since both you an submitter (Sergei) checked that the current maintainer (Cory) has not been around for long, I would go with the proposed change and let the submitter be the new maintainer. That would be only for https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D257991 Now, if Cory has more unmaintained ports (can't check right now) and Sergei steps up to take the task, I would ask him to open a new PR requesting maintainership. If he doesn't, it might still be good to open the PR and reset maintainership. That way at least more people would be notified via portscout when there is a new upstream version. Someone might come along and update the port :-) HTH > Thanks, > > Nuno Teixeita > --0000000000001d65e505ca480d92-- From nobody Tue Aug 24 08:58:13 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DA79178E566 for ; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 08:58:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marklmi@yahoo.com) Received: from sonic315-8.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (sonic315-8.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com [98.137.65.32]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Gv31F1nPGz4VYf for ; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 08:58:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marklmi@yahoo.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1629795497; bh=wjUKVpP/UulxRMvm8VidgKjx4wa5hWKsZ0GGyhGcTos=; h=From:Subject:Date:To:References:From:Subject:Reply-To; b=P4WutpNGSFVQRi288I3sUBEdChbIIYIc8s7wxjU6GpBC7AHHGu0uFrmUi/jZ5L5rg5BmLC5BnP/Bh8cm1MnUM65CPVVCBE/oZfbrKaewUouBQOCNwsRl2mXbY4Thl2TLvWtANtbExxv/R+D3Ro7joqUQ3IqOazLE75vi6fXTLjT2Lw+Ckme9FSpirQW9OWzaLMvSKjVY2ZTN6OvbZylf18xw4tWedHY2Dxx0rKLAPhCwC/CxDN1ZXAs0kMAKTyIC1L1uD7Qj0ZBYGtROOEFecKSy/QHbLsKdPrlDGlSpsLNIAg5ryppX3wiOcfU/bGuWQOBawn3ZMCpZ0PJTCa4T0w== X-SONIC-DKIM-SIGN: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1629795497; bh=5CBC1OV1ownmXEAlOxJW3GVvwpdidAHHJrikTjwoaUL=; h=X-Sonic-MF:From:Subject:Date:To:From:Subject; b=Hqf4F0mDUjIANXraXnXFdRv2Rg2XcA4ZDkQGxinm8JWkCwXu7VadoOifudYAKoPYvtswhKvGX9DwP66nnLuxD+2pQtDFKjtxnsHbg7Bq0M55Pkz8i4nHzwldeWkTJortsE3CrQ/kJ40eE+jP2f6eBxiknPQUQ6KKgeA/yqJjY0xeDb7yfyCYSCWGZg1aCGiOk12LoQPiIRxl196Iaw9BWl6QQClVg3Ej4HO4M8J3qmZ+gogol+1HJmLB0HyR3RjGU95sptHImGAihyeDDNsN+MdFGO57CwaI8Mp1iPdTQaIzIyxnMhI9amHQX2qpjnNbpPZ1w1dDSABE3KK0O8NSXQ== X-YMail-OSG: 9AXOGAAVM1k1RyeYOZ5zWM3fmJWux9gUXGgqmY_OYVD7PpCcfsGJ5RlUC083TWG rvjC7EXEcIzCp2sKAW93l6wg0hY94mfqjf9HG1nRT7IjrO1GE77Opm2DlD4ZiP62Y1o41eHoq2md KSNv0yaA7z7cX9Riv4Llf5JE08dz5jodauqmoLyeyOMkQGlzyt_oE7DJ0vTdxrXFBeR0Mwx7BvdD DwQXT.s3paEl46k5VupwPzMCLHVLglCgOjLvRaqgTXKYR8U6Hgrc.5NtnI4lUbguSv5GNV7IZy.V 8N5ied1yei0VaprrObcp8MtYPbwPDiWGHMHDpQUI2L3FJcrZCjnX0RKK3rTZJfQTwlz1ajFK9ZqZ t5SJrTaes4VyQUcpM5sAHJp5bEzuFgNaH9vgQ5rRGDgXik0OGe0q2uBdTJBgv7dCvz6_3ea9Fmo2 l_wVAjxJ9vvJOQyjFq1vVMZmBitHPkNiGxUNcmoO.RHBubxAU0VZXmt6oxiTA.bOooEyNCuUxKxW A442sgPwcWI3cGD_AEDX4hoPbZSj6Ako37EqlngxvckoXsDbAhD02b8siXj1P9vBVblds4npjcS5 M77NisQMV7_X3Xfv4NTKtXn0kYZLZtDZns0cAdDXgqGQRUAPo774Fr4ac7a.BDFquRhdIHE.8yP6 TLCvwv2dnSO1ouwWDNstB5..5uEeU4qoYBNmxDoa..ge4fKICLOk.Y5IYN8uk3UtTiRlnO2tvk_5 8LWyBjOaQONNCoLweafALJpTCHaghVRESJMtUDIppdZNATUsB16FHjZ0UkzidHR_oAwfAIITWcLU Kd_AxuKYhptwdvgh5JBf6JIEmd7Njie3yWT4kzI3utjuKylPay45jHjGo244lD.gZi4Pz7aZBw6c Kai11pSAOX7qKzlsiS2c9n4xE9LmZZm4i8kh_5ESSMzS9WwkYdJm1cZOI7O0FjCU.nZXIti2HNRb BxTh3b2aqbfvuQsm7jScffOdfp3KxSTEy7CrcacDVJ0rnfba4D4HMjW9rzw1rjqYWXW71IHqddkF qnveUkx3Mbv17raf8PtvYUseBhqGrevLtK4sk6G.3W.OPaMn2OMXkD23WtvJwBY5.wjfidpERfA4 KS0BE0GSnL3.GKWMmAUGRcoDjy_NtrpynkfslrC_xqQYlQ9viTJ47UnzQsHG93.CZI6JLd_GotSU jltjkbiZTMk4.89vOBk_c3S0DBLLK_OVQlYfG.b.CmFiYLm9GtesF.NNomxeKU_U56F1XXkPe_D4 KSVGr3BV5IWaIK4mNtCbTOTxACDXp9AFApFZM4wUfVGABcTq_c.0JKbh0xXlc_dfn_5P2hL_7e7p C9A31Jdg_ZKyp3deTc19MsDkTF4z_WWyjvhzl8..DtFDY7BhqL6KXPHyHmRcIznftDsmxBkAVTBr iht_CkCa.mwnrj2n8is8xHtQ7Rz8o0Sr4Fz.a2.uFgNiJyXxKSFCCtgamGcOQZKxQ7o9TtNTwB9Y tylbUaOiFNWLspJ5D0U9y1vS416o9A94oImRu2xG3wSoxRP9blCQjInAJvJUW_G.kjf6_2V55JTh 5V_FwSNTIO7fkOL9j2dHZjPhFrZY.pm83PceJTHWDxrARG018Eo7jkoYAdyKqnBc0adatAe7ESbn 9TAulrR9M3nqMva72pNbsPKCPBhBVpas64MwFSmuJSlxcFjTB7edoaj6JSKF4Ey1K0sSxYXeOHJ4 iElXcd3PADZrRlnPxcV1.RAAp1bULocCss8jKfNsrPO6FgMkfSYdCYj24J.H43z5oaov4KLbUOJu O8.NYU8PLxw_SFfiK6xCdrUFGQwiVyk6lj3WC3CZPW_Cra6HpLFwoDlYo.Fx9GZlGURHrOLA17Lk _WSj.H2vOnGAZRhxMZF9h2i0EoY5cG0VX1kH6dU5EjdsDFb975FfQB8vgUHqjlvjdysrtoOSgp.r k3jiKeCwsP11XpHVOeO26eHlHqMDLpx8QhdQqNBxRE20P0PMb0X86Gy08Xvj_xBKimFEssdToaAG uaKkH_cBfp2jed_euBz4yNVVpnPf59VAWa5HACX4ngeeq2Cx0e5AB1fdw9EBKco2yqtdIWdKAUZ. aY8a_NpDOmnrxMPF6JiUrXFUX2Dsk6k3F1i9gD9HSz5BAZr7yhB.XAl2a4v9dJMCGxZJSpEq_ial H7IhiMgTTmeZOhDLLRAbOQ4gz.9ggz3687zvKKBWMa9GkMqNSGIIDCNo9qO4AlUc4IjYFGrvbmUw jdKuuFtlplCHesu6gDYSAGeSztzbMtnw1QUBlmvMK825m7URjbIlb6msAl_bIpvk6VCE9xYDO8z2 IC.14o6kiTQm6JOZC9XICHiaAGZ9_d3hNmL0aKcga6rCuSi6K03wv.p8z81rPMQ-- X-Sonic-MF: Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic315.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with HTTP; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 08:58:17 +0000 Received: by kubenode510.mail-prod1.omega.ne1.yahoo.com (VZM Hermes SMTP Server) with ESMTPA ID 3229aba3aec797e8fcbb95baa1299f52; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 08:58:14 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.120.0.1.13\)) Subject: Re: Controlling python when building www/chromium Message-Id: <32251809-3419-4DBA-A623-B8B4B2294440@yahoo.com> Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2021 01:58:13 -0700 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, bob prohaska X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.120.0.1.13) References: <32251809-3419-4DBA-A623-B8B4B2294440.ref@yahoo.com> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Gv31F1nPGz4VYf X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=yahoo.com header.s=s2048 header.b=P4WutpNG; dmarc=pass (policy=reject) header.from=yahoo.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of marklmi@yahoo.com designates 98.137.65.32 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=marklmi@yahoo.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.50 / 15.00]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[yahoo.com:s=s2048]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[yahoo.com]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ptr:yahoo.com]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[yahoo.com:dkim]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[yahoo.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[98.137.65.32:from]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[yahoo.com,reject]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[yahoo.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:36647, ipnet:98.137.64.0/20, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[98.137.65.32:from] Reply-To: marklmi@yahoo.com From: Mark Millard via freebsd-ports X-Original-From: Mark Millard X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N bob prohaska wrote on Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2021 08:27:33 -0700 : > When trying to build www/chromium on a 1 GB Pi3 the system > gets bogged down by five instances of python2.7 running > simultaneously. This happens using both poudriere and make. >=20 > It wasn't a problem a year ago, so presumably something has > changed in chromium's internal build machinery. I've searched >=20 > https://www.chromium.org/developers/how-tos/get-the-code > and >=20 > https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/chromium-dev >=20 > but couldn't find any references to python when compiling, only > when running the browser. =20 >=20 > Is there some way to control how many pythons are loosed at one time? > Most likely two could be accomodated, possibly three. On an 8 GB > Pi4 the five pythons coexist happily, so the behavior is probably > not considered a bug. =20 Bob did not show the context. Below I show an example from his public poudriere logs, a copy from an off-list mail, for reference: QUOTE When I looked recently, the peak swap usage reported was: Fri Aug 6 00:39:58 PDT 2021 Device 1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity /dev/da0s2b 1843200 1617020 226180 88% /dev/mmcsd0s2b 1843200 1615244 227956 88% Total 3686400 3232264 454136 88% and was for (showing the one after that total): `-- /bin/sh ./buildscript.chromium `-- /usr/local/libexec/poudriere/sh -e = /usr/local/share/poudriere/bulk.sh -j main www/chromium |-- /usr/local/libexec/poudriere/sh -e = /usr/local/share/poudriere/bulk.sh -j main www/chromium |-- /usr/local/libexec/poudriere/sh -e = /usr/local/share/poudriere/bulk.sh -j main www/chromium `-- sh: poudriere[main-default][01]: build_pkg = (chromium-91.0.4472.114_1) (sh) |-- sh: poudriere[main-default][01]: build_pkg = (chromium-91.0.4472.114_1) (sh) | `-- /usr/bin/make -C /usr/ports/www/chromium build | `-- (sh) | `-- ninja -j1 -C out/Release chromedriver -v chrome | `-- python = ../../third_party/blink/renderer/bindings/scripts/generate_bindings.py = --web_idl_database = gen/third_party/blink/renderer/bindings/web_idl_database.pickle . . . | |-- python = ../../third_party/blink/renderer/bindings/scripts/generate_bindings.py = --web_idl_database = gen/third_party/blink/renderer/bindings/web_idl_database.pickle . . . | |-- python = ../../third_party/blink/renderer/bindings/scripts/generate_bindings.py = --web_idl_database = gen/third_party/blink/renderer/bindings/web_idl_database.pickle . . . | |-- python = ../../third_party/blink/renderer/bindings/scripts/generate_bindings.py = --web_idl_database = gen/third_party/blink/renderer/bindings/web_idl_database.pickle . . . | `-- python = ../../third_party/blink/renderer/bindings/scripts/generate_bindings.py = --web_idl_database = gen/third_party/blink/renderer/bindings/web_idl_database.pickle . . . `-- timestamp END QUOTE This was the most extreme swap/paging space usage from somewhat analogous use of a generate_bindings. The swap/paging space usage makes trying multiple builders impractical: it actually does run out of swap/paging space. (There are limits to how big of a swap avoids potential mistuning for a given size RAM. swap/paging+RAM can be larger on a 8 GiByte RPi4B can be much larger than on a RPi3B, without getting notices suggesting a mistuned environment.) (It is not necessarily Python 2.7. The build, overall, only uses 2.7 sometimes in some places.) = https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/refs/heads/main/third_par= ty/blink/renderer/bindings/scripts/generate_bindings.py shows: bind_gen.init(web_idl_database_path=3Doptions.web_idl_database, root_src_dir=3Doptions.root_src_dir, root_gen_dir=3Doptions.root_gen_dir, component_reldirs=3Dcomponent_reldirs, enable_style_format=3Doptions.format_generated_files) task_queue =3D = bind_gen.TaskQueue(single_process=3Doptions.single_process) for task in options.tasks: dispatch_table[task](task_queue) which I would guess is the code initiating the parallel python processes above. Looking at the history, the first use of .TaskQueue here seems to have been at: chromium / chromium / src / 3b8f5a3b2903f2aa50efb971f430ddce57a17d16^! / = . / third_party / blink / renderer / bindings / scripts / = generate_bindings.py commit 3b8f5a3b2903f2aa50efb971f430ddce57a17d16 [log] [tgz] author Yuki Shiino Thu Jun 04 05:01:43 2020 committer Commit Bot Thu Jun 04 = 05:01:43 2020 tree 46e7ea9138d3452f1b864cbe1d9c3d1adaa62a57 parent 54c74ea75c7984bbfa11ed6232821af1943ef922 [diff] [blame] (I did not look for other contexts with .TaskQueue uage additions.) =3D=3D=3D Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away in early 2018-Mar) From nobody Tue Aug 24 09:09:54 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB0D417948BC for ; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 09:10:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from SRS0=4vZC=NP=klop.ws=ronald-lists@realworks.nl) Received: from smtp-relay-int.realworks.nl (smtp-relay-int.realworks.nl [194.109.157.24]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Gv3Gd2fG2z4ZmZ for ; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 09:10:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from SRS0=4vZC=NP=klop.ws=ronald-lists@realworks.nl) Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2021 11:09:54 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=klop.ws; s=rw2; t=1629796194; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=wbATcs3kpEgzWymN5rAPolntnSI2apvPtk3d3vfw8TA=; b=HWDWh6bMupvDlJZxLh8Bss0CuY+uYgce/t8T9N4QQey2mJZlxujBD1nET3TWIR5LcjW8P/ FrO5/yeD94Bf36M9tJMzYX/VmFVBrVdkhReQ7M5ixlkbWCHFehXTkP24FF+p4wYPB2wbsG iwwCsYE3SFUiwS1Q1qBt4FdDrKG6cEGV3L4arYIzr1uwGuL3kboWOgjmOJsgUI0N+HueCs hzzSFjZsnudl1e8enqaoFHUIYRDTDGMtEM34rFYqRyZJxo7Y/AIpG0twoOIxSsO4l3C2j7 +U+t1lYfOfoKJMyClCvzY5k8ziTB7f/cxnvkeUxf18PtAS+r7V7mS/z9cwRvFg== From: Ronald Klop To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <1626116829.117.1629796194106@localhost> In-Reply-To: <32251809-3419-4DBA-A623-B8B4B2294440@yahoo.com> References: <32251809-3419-4DBA-A623-B8B4B2294440.ref@yahoo.com> <32251809-3419-4DBA-A623-B8B4B2294440@yahoo.com> Subject: Re: Controlling python when building www/chromium List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_116_1458766480.1629796194044" X-Mailer: Realworks (572.25.5dfdc28) Importance: Normal X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Gv3Gd2fG2z4ZmZ X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=klop.ws header.s=rw2 header.b=HWDWh6bM; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=klop.ws; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of "SRS0=4vZC=NP=klop.ws=ronald-lists@realworks.nl" designates 194.109.157.24 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="SRS0=4vZC=NP=klop.ws=ronald-lists@realworks.nl" X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.20 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[klop.ws:s=rw2]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:194.109.157.0/24]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[klop.ws:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[klop.ws,none]; HAS_X_PRIO_THREE(0.00)[3]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[194.109.157.24:from]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[ronald-lists@klop.ws,SRS0=4vZC=NP=klop.ws=ronald-lists@realworks.nl]; RCVD_COUNT_ZERO(0.00)[0]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[194.109.157.24:from]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:3265, ipnet:194.109.0.0/16, country:NL]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[ronald-lists@klop.ws,SRS0=4vZC=NP=klop.ws=ronald-lists@realworks.nl] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: Y ------=_Part_116_1458766480.1629796194044 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Van: Mark Millard via freebsd-ports Datum: dinsdag, 24 augustus 2021 10:58 Aan: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, bob prohaska Onderwerp: Re: Controlling python when building www/chromium > > > bob prohaska wrote on > Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2021 08:27:33 -0700 : > > > When trying to build www/chromium on a 1 GB Pi3 the system > > gets bogged down by five instances of python2.7 running > > simultaneously. This happens using both poudriere and make. > > > > It wasn't a problem a year ago, so presumably something has > > changed in chromium's internal build machinery. I've searched > > > > https://www.chromium.org/developers/how-tos/get-the-code > > and > > > > https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/chromium-dev > > > > but couldn't find any references to python when compiling, only > > when running the browser. > > > > Is there some way to control how many pythons are loosed at one time? > > Most likely two could be accomodated, possibly three. On an 8 GB > > Pi4 the five pythons coexist happily, so the behavior is probably > > not considered a bug. > > > Bob did not show the context. Below I show an example from his > public poudriere logs, a copy from an off-list mail, for > reference: > > QUOTE > When I looked recently, the peak swap usage reported was: > > Fri Aug 6 00:39:58 PDT 2021 > Device 1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity > /dev/da0s2b 1843200 1617020 226180 88% > /dev/mmcsd0s2b 1843200 1615244 227956 88% > Total 3686400 3232264 454136 88% > > and was for (showing the one after that total): > > `-- /bin/sh ./buildscript.chromium > `-- /usr/local/libexec/poudriere/sh -e /usr/local/share/poudriere/bulk.sh -j main www/chromium > |-- /usr/local/libexec/poudriere/sh -e /usr/local/share/poudriere/bulk.sh -j main www/chromium > |-- /usr/local/libexec/poudriere/sh -e /usr/local/share/poudriere/bulk.sh -j main www/chromium > `-- sh: poudriere[main-default][01]: build_pkg (chromium-91.0.4472.114_1) (sh) > |-- sh: poudriere[main-default][01]: build_pkg (chromium-91.0.4472.114_1) (sh) > | `-- /usr/bin/make -C /usr/ports/www/chromium build > | `-- (sh) > | `-- ninja -j1 -C out/Release chromedriver -v chrome > | `-- python ../../third_party/blink/renderer/bindings/scripts/generate_bindings.py --web_idl_database gen/third_party/blink/renderer/bindings/web_idl_database.pickle . . . > | |-- python ../../third_party/blink/renderer/bindings/scripts/generate_bindings.py --web_idl_database gen/third_party/blink/renderer/bindings/web_idl_database.pickle . . . > | |-- python ../../third_party/blink/renderer/bindings/scripts/generate_bindings.py --web_idl_database gen/third_party/blink/renderer/bindings/web_idl_database.pickle . . . > | |-- python ../../third_party/blink/renderer/bindings/scripts/generate_bindings.py --web_idl_database gen/third_party/blink/renderer/bindings/web_idl_database.pickle . . . > | `-- python ../../third_party/blink/renderer/bindings/scripts/generate_bindings.py --web_idl_database gen/third_party/blink/renderer/bindings/web_idl_database.pickle . . . > `-- timestamp > END QUOTE > > This was the most extreme swap/paging space usage from somewhat > analogous use of a generate_bindings. The swap/paging space > usage makes trying multiple builders impractical: it actually > does run out of swap/paging space. (There are limits to how > big of a swap avoids potential mistuning for a given size RAM. > swap/paging+RAM can be larger on a 8 GiByte RPi4B can be much > larger than on a RPi3B, without getting notices suggesting > a mistuned environment.) > > (It is not necessarily Python 2.7. The build, overall, only uses > 2.7 sometimes in some places.) > > https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/refs/heads/main/third_party/blink/renderer/bindings/scripts/generate_bindings.py shows: > > > bind_gen.init(web_idl_database_path=options.web_idl_database, > root_src_dir=options.root_src_dir, > root_gen_dir=options.root_gen_dir, > component_reldirs=component_reldirs, > enable_style_format=options.format_generated_files) > task_queue = bind_gen.TaskQueue(single_process=options.single_process) > for task in options.tasks: > dispatch_table[task](task_queue) > > which I would guess is the code initiating the parallel python > processes above. > > Looking at the history, the first use of .TaskQueue here seems to have > been at: > > chromium / chromium / src / 3b8f5a3b2903f2aa50efb971f430ddce57a17d16^! / . / third_party / blink / renderer / bindings / scripts / generate_bindings.py > commit 3b8f5a3b2903f2aa50efb971f430ddce57a17d16 [log] [tgz] > author Yuki Shiino Thu Jun 04 05:01:43 2020 > committer Commit Bot Thu Jun 04 05:01:43 2020 > tree 46e7ea9138d3452f1b864cbe1d9c3d1adaa62a57 > parent 54c74ea75c7984bbfa11ed6232821af1943ef922 [diff] [blame] > > > (I did not look for other contexts with .TaskQueue uage additions.) > > > > === > Mark Millard > marklmi at yahoo.com > ( dsl-only.net went > away in early 2018-Mar) > > > > > Hi, Without looking into the code, I would guess that it should be possible to set "options.single_process" (if -j1 is set). As the RPI3 has 4 cores it apparently auto-scales to the amount of CPUs. But I don't have the time to look into the ninja build file. Regards, Ronald. ------=_Part_116_1458766480.1629796194044-- From nobody Tue Aug 24 15:35:54 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23B8317898C3 for ; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 15:35:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd@www.zefox.net) Received: from www.zefox.net (www.zefox.net [50.1.20.27]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "www.zefox.com", Issuer "www.zefox.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4GvCqx6GqXz3lg2 for ; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 15:35:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd@www.zefox.net) Received: from www.zefox.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by www.zefox.net (8.16.1/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 17OFZsG8027099 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 24 Aug 2021 08:35:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fbsd@www.zefox.net) Received: (from fbsd@localhost) by www.zefox.net (8.16.1/8.15.2/Submit) id 17OFZscf027098; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 08:35:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fbsd) Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2021 08:35:54 -0700 From: bob prohaska To: bob prohaska Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Controlling python when building www/chromium Message-ID: <20210824153554.GA26278@www.zefox.net> References: <32251809-3419-4DBA-A623-B8B4B2294440.ref@yahoo.com> <32251809-3419-4DBA-A623-B8B4B2294440@yahoo.com> <1626116829.117.1629796194106@localhost> List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1626116829.117.1629796194106@localhost> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4GvCqx6GqXz3lg2 X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of fbsd@www.zefox.net has no SPF policy when checking 50.1.20.27) smtp.mailfrom=fbsd@www.zefox.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.88 / 15.00]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; WWW_DOT_DOMAIN(0.50)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[zefox.net]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.91)[-0.908]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.89)[0.886]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7065, ipnet:50.1.16.0/20, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MID_RHS_WWW(0.50)[] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 11:09:54AM +0200, Ronald Klop wrote: > > Van: Mark Millard via freebsd-ports > Datum: dinsdag, 24 augustus 2021 10:58 > Aan: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, bob prohaska > Onderwerp: Re: Controlling python when building www/chromium > > > > > > bob prohaska wrote on > > Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2021 08:27:33 -0700 : > > > > > When trying to build www/chromium on a 1 GB Pi3 the system > > > gets bogged down by five instances of python2.7 running > > > simultaneously. This happens using both poudriere and make. > > > > > > It wasn't a problem a year ago, so presumably something has > > > changed in chromium's internal build machinery. I've searched > > > > > > https://www.chromium.org/developers/how-tos/get-the-code > > > and > > > > > > https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/chromium-dev > > > > > > but couldn't find any references to python when compiling, only > > > when running the browser. > > > > Is there some way to control how many pythons are loosed at one time? > > > Most likely two could be accomodated, possibly three. On an 8 GB > > > Pi4 the five pythons coexist happily, so the behavior is probably > > > not considered a bug. > > > > > > Bob did not show the context. Below I show an example from his > > public poudriere logs, a copy from an off-list mail, for > > reference: > > > > QUOTE > > When I looked recently, the peak swap usage reported was: > > > > Fri Aug 6 00:39:58 PDT 2021 > > Device 1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity > > /dev/da0s2b 1843200 1617020 226180 88% > > /dev/mmcsd0s2b 1843200 1615244 227956 88% > > Total 3686400 3232264 454136 88% > > > > and was for (showing the one after that total): > > > > `-- /bin/sh ./buildscript.chromium > > `-- /usr/local/libexec/poudriere/sh -e /usr/local/share/poudriere/bulk.sh -j main www/chromium > > |-- /usr/local/libexec/poudriere/sh -e /usr/local/share/poudriere/bulk.sh -j main www/chromium > > |-- /usr/local/libexec/poudriere/sh -e /usr/local/share/poudriere/bulk.sh -j main www/chromium > > `-- sh: poudriere[main-default][01]: build_pkg (chromium-91.0.4472.114_1) (sh) > > |-- sh: poudriere[main-default][01]: build_pkg (chromium-91.0.4472.114_1) (sh) > > | `-- /usr/bin/make -C /usr/ports/www/chromium build > > | `-- (sh) > > | `-- ninja -j1 -C out/Release chromedriver -v chrome > > | `-- python ../../third_party/blink/renderer/bindings/scripts/generate_bindings.py --web_idl_database gen/third_party/blink/renderer/bindings/web_idl_database.pickle . . . > > | |-- python ../../third_party/blink/renderer/bindings/scripts/generate_bindings.py --web_idl_database gen/third_party/blink/renderer/bindings/web_idl_database.pickle . . . > > | |-- python ../../third_party/blink/renderer/bindings/scripts/generate_bindings.py --web_idl_database gen/third_party/blink/renderer/bindings/web_idl_database.pickle . . . > > | |-- python ../../third_party/blink/renderer/bindings/scripts/generate_bindings.py --web_idl_database gen/third_party/blink/renderer/bindings/web_idl_database.pickle . . . > > | `-- python ../../third_party/blink/renderer/bindings/scripts/generate_bindings.py --web_idl_database gen/third_party/blink/renderer/bindings/web_idl_database.pickle . . . > > `-- timestamp > > END QUOTE > > > > This was the most extreme swap/paging space usage from somewhat > > analogous use of a generate_bindings. The swap/paging space > > usage makes trying multiple builders impractical: it actually > > does run out of swap/paging space. (There are limits to how > > big of a swap avoids potential mistuning for a given size RAM. > > swap/paging+RAM can be larger on a 8 GiByte RPi4B can be much > > larger than on a RPi3B, without getting notices suggesting > > a mistuned environment.) > > > > (It is not necessarily Python 2.7. The build, overall, only uses > > 2.7 sometimes in some places.) > > > > https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/refs/heads/main/third_party/blink/renderer/bindings/scripts/generate_bindings.py shows: > > > > > > bind_gen.init(web_idl_database_path=options.web_idl_database, > > root_src_dir=options.root_src_dir, > > root_gen_dir=options.root_gen_dir, > > component_reldirs=component_reldirs, > > enable_style_format=options.format_generated_files) > > task_queue = bind_gen.TaskQueue(single_process=options.single_process) > > for task in options.tasks: > > dispatch_table[task](task_queue) > > > > which I would guess is the code initiating the parallel python > > processes above. > > > > Looking at the history, the first use of .TaskQueue here seems to have > > been at: > > > > chromium / chromium / src / 3b8f5a3b2903f2aa50efb971f430ddce57a17d16^! / . / third_party / blink / renderer / bindings / scripts / generate_bindings.py > > commit 3b8f5a3b2903f2aa50efb971f430ddce57a17d16 [log] [tgz] > > author Yuki Shiino Thu Jun 04 05:01:43 2020 > > committer Commit Bot Thu Jun 04 05:01:43 2020 > > tree 46e7ea9138d3452f1b864cbe1d9c3d1adaa62a57 > > parent 54c74ea75c7984bbfa11ed6232821af1943ef922 [diff] [blame] > > > > > > (I did not look for other contexts with .TaskQueue uage additions.) > > > > > > > > === > > Mark Millard > > marklmi at yahoo.com > > ( dsl-only.net went > > away in early 2018-Mar) > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > Without looking into the code, I would guess that it should be possible to set "options.single_process" (if -j1 is set). > As the RPI3 has 4 cores it apparently auto-scales to the amount of CPUs. > But I don't have the time to look into the ninja build file. > After the latest poudriere failure I again tried using make in www/chromium. It also got bogged down with five pythons and eventually stopped. At that point I simply restarted the make session without cleaning and left the system to run overnight. As of this morning there are two c++ instances, the system is only ~45% idle and it seems to be making good progress:[ 18% 5544/29872] The two c++ instances are consistent with /etc/make.conf . Does this behavior offer any hints into when and how the surplus of pythons gets hatched? The build session is visible via http://www.zefox.org/~bob/usr.ports/www/chromium/ The actvivity logging script is still running from the poudriere session and the output is visible at http://www.zefox.org/~bob/swaplogs/20210816.log however the file is now somewhat unwieldy in size. Thanks for reading, and any thoughts. bob prohaska From nobody Tue Aug 24 22:52:36 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EA34178E1D4 for ; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 22:52:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eduardo@freebsd.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::24b:4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4GvPX01z3Bz4VnK for ; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 22:52:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eduardo@freebsd.org) Received: from mail-ej1-f53.google.com (mail-ej1-f53.google.com [209.85.218.53]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) (Authenticated sender: eduardo) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 25F8F2E084 for ; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 22:52:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eduardo@freebsd.org) Received: by mail-ej1-f53.google.com with SMTP id d11so47452108eja.8 for ; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 15:52:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530h01fzJYNbuhTeJwHLktjO+yhqsS8+Gjzjg1gCb59us47MaZtl yvCMg6rOr/Glz74ENwWnL7O6oqDWji5ZVAnhmDs= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxn32IuA0MpzbR84semBatAi4vs/uFeBc/kNbMAskej4yhv09Y8ffrQnIAGo22Qky3+dXe6mQZpRvpxbU0DJZo= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:a0da:: with SMTP id bh26mr19198869ejb.505.1629845567044; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 15:52:47 -0700 (PDT) List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Nuno Teixeira Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2021 23:52:36 +0100 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: Help needed on a possible multiple ports maintainer reset To: =?UTF-8?Q?Fernando_Apestegu=C3=ADa?= Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000010007d05ca55fe12" X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: Y --00000000000010007d05ca55fe12 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello Fernando! Thanks for your great help. I did put submitter as maintainer on PR 257991 , hope I did it right :) If I had the time I will check all ports from Cory and do a reset like, e.g., https://reviews.freebsd.org/R11:707989ed0f7c if timeout is proved. Thanks very much, Nuno Teixeira Fernando Apestegu=C3=ADa escreveu no dia te= r=C3=A7a, 24/08/2021 =C3=A0(s) 07:14: > > > El lun., 23 ago. 2021 23:03, Nuno Teixeira escribi= =C3=B3: > >> Hello! >> >> I'm an young committer and I found this PR >> interesting >> because of a possible multiple ports maintainer reset so other people >> could >> adopt port unmaintained. >> >> Need some experienced committer that takes a look and give some advice >> about maintaner reset. >> > > Hi Nuno, > > Since both you an submitter (Sergei) checked that the current maintainer > (Cory) has not been around for long, I would go with the proposed change > and let the submitter be the new maintainer. > > That would be only for > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D257991 > > Now, if Cory has more unmaintained ports (can't check right now) and > Sergei steps up to take the task, I would ask him to open a new PR > requesting maintainership. If he doesn't, it might still be good to open > the PR and reset maintainership. That way at least more people would be > notified via portscout when there is a new upstream version. Someone migh= t > come along and update the port :-) > > HTH > > >> Thanks, >> >> Nuno Teixeita >> > --00000000000010007d05ca55fe12-- From nobody Wed Aug 25 07:53:48 2021 X-Original-To: ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4A87179C563 for ; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 07:53:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4GvdXF1RfBz3Mlp for ; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 07:53:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (portscout.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 12FEC18CB6 for ; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 07:53:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.nyi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.10]) by portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 17P7rmYc039284 for ; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 07:53:48 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 17P7rmFv039283; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 07:53:48 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <202108250753.17P7rmFv039283@portscout.nyi.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.nyi.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2021 07:53:48 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ devel/mingw32-openssl | 1.0.2d | 1.1.1l ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ net/lualdap | 1.3.0 | start ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Reported by: portscout! From nobody Wed Aug 25 07:58:59 2021 X-Original-To: ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19E7D179EA3B for ; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 07:59:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lumiwa@dismail.de) Received: from mx1.dismail.de (mx1.dismail.de [78.46.223.134]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA512 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mx1.dismail.de", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Gvdg66GNhz3PnJ for ; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 07:59:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lumiwa@dismail.de) Received: from mx1.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id d2a11cdf for ; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 09:59:39 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=dismail.de; h=date:from :to:subject:message-id:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=20190914; bh=8KG0PXI9z2mOu1VPhS+15 D9yo55P8hY5RDngDeswfcc=; b=Kl4aeNIavY7wlROS1O2eYY8WYq/zHDBq0AuB0 RKWEm6U3/Nk2gix1FQvffMjXzYNZfGZsgQF6yGunNvzD+dfJB+dwJpdHDyigebti 5AzGGqXUJOrSqLHYw1EyItMhau9ruQNfNbjbZr2ET3ygBIOjXPlJDjHKn9YKSB63 guz0f1tX3DuF4B1OyRS0Px7bpkIvgBwRvuqgyU/dzn/IIW/Y8jTYd3hcLT44d+do p+v7y8DtOKWRlx3EO+Id0uDg2gtZ8+K5WZSTmUVRxYV+1J/EOGKKsM6uhovU4GxP CG5pa9aUOQuRAjpnVvPZ5wFM8tsMA7BT+7Ub02NCIiYKX9aAA== Received: from smtp1.dismail.de ( [10.240.26.11]) by mx1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 8f801970 for ; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 09:59:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp1.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 537f6355 for ; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 09:59:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: by dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id af18bd40 (TLSv1.3:AEAD-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO) for ; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 09:59:38 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2021 03:58:59 -0400 To: FreeBSD Ports Subject: gitup ports Message-ID: <20210825035859.69854545@dismail.de> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.18.0 (GTK+ 2.24.33; amd64-portbld-freebsd13.0) List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Gvdg66GNhz3PnJ X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=dismail.de header.s=20190914 header.b=Kl4aeNIa; dmarc=pass (policy=reject) header.from=dismail.de; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of lumiwa@dismail.de designates 78.46.223.134 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=lumiwa@dismail.de X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.07 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[dismail.de:s=20190914]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:78.46.223.134]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[ports@freebsd.org]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(1.00)[1.000]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; DWL_DNSWL_LOW(-1.00)[dismail.de:dkim]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[dismail.de:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[dismail.de,reject]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.97)[-0.969]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:78.46.0.0/15, country:DE]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[78.46.223.134:from] Reply-To: lumiwa@dismail.de From: LuMiWa via ports X-Original-From: LuMiWa X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N On FreeBSD 13.0-RELEASE-p4 I have a problem with gitup ports: gitup ports # Scanning local repository... # Host: github.com # Port: 443 # Repository Path: /freebsd/freebsd-ports.git # Target Directory: /usr/ports # Commit History: yes # Have: 8ba9809ca02105b8d4de8fa794eb98e447fae8a8 # Want: 6234479982621235dc99824a812cd9ee11dbbf93 # Branch: main # Action: pull Segmentation fault (core dumped) root@lumiwa:~# freebsd-update fetch Thank you. --=20 "Everyone thinks of changing the world, but no one thinks of changing himself.=E2=80=9D Leo Tolstoy From nobody Wed Aug 25 08:26:00 2021 X-Original-To: ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D1411782D2E for ; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 08:26:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from herbert@gojira.at) Received: from mail.bsd4all.net (mail.bsd4all.net [94.130.200.20]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mail.bsd4all.net", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4GvfFY0jvdz3nCn for ; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 08:26:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from herbert@gojira.at) Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2021 10:26:00 +0200 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=gojira.at; s=mail202005; t=1629879960; bh=4LlssoC+BxKCwPE6zCv70tJtnVEgSYS8mPHcinfAOhQ=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=vnW4Np59qK0KjcUr+WYxugEsa6E0DkFi+8zP8fX5AwMHzYfuOkpADj9FLlDiN9yhq 7A/Q71iIb9gGrxeFFCOud3GlM/ACN5E9UHLrWBwyrFDJxfzHAKUV0SFzMsMAXXc0Ym VQ5xlmZ22U5qqC8/Sn3vIFxsNkiAHx6qIrBBXLhDngVZrLW9CmXZ7/moChk1QlWrsq 1Ap6JCB9d0Q4pvhiuG+z1AC5NSQztUJdY4TANsz9zPrwKlVwpzMsVIVsI970zdFbau Ag8dPlH9ihALAjKdWPwMhRH3/twyPiBYyse8R7GGg1KaVILo67j1hw/1hpLLkKyLTa 7xblD4fWBr3YA== From: "Herbert J. Skuhra" To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gitup ports Message-ID: References: <20210825035859.69854545@dismail.de> List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210825035859.69854545@dismail.de> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4GvfFY0jvdz3nCn X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gojira.at header.s=mail202005 header.b=vnW4Np59; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of herbert@gojira.at designates 94.130.200.20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=herbert@gojira.at X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.50 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gojira.at:s=mail202005]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:94.130.200.20]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[gojira.at]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(1.00)[1.000]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(1.00)[1.000]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gojira.at:+]; RCVD_COUNT_ZERO(0.00)[0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:94.130.0.0/16, country:DE] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 03:58:59AM -0400, LuMiWa via ports wrote: > On FreeBSD 13.0-RELEASE-p4 I have a problem with gitup ports: > > gitup ports > # Scanning local repository... > # Host: github.com > # Port: 443 > # Repository Path: /freebsd/freebsd-ports.git > # Target Directory: /usr/ports > # Commit History: yes > # Have: 8ba9809ca02105b8d4de8fa794eb98e447fae8a8 > # Want: 6234479982621235dc99824a812cd9ee11dbbf93 > # Branch: main > # Action: pull > Segmentation fault (core dumped) Try to update your gitup.conf and/or switch from github.com to git.freebsd.org. https://github.com/johnmehr/gitup/issues/73 https://github.com/johnmehr/gitup/issues/74 Or install git-tiny. -- Herbert From nobody Wed Aug 25 15:42:13 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A7B6178A791 for ; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 15:42:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pvoigt@uos.de) Received: from vm411.rz.uni-osnabrueck.de (smtp-auth-1.serv.uni-osnabrueck.de [IPv6:2001:638:508:100::83ad:108f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Gvqwm4kFWz3nLm; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 15:42:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pvoigt@uos.de) Received: from spock.drpetervoigt.eu (spock.drpetervoigt.eu [IPv6:2003:a:46a:b801:ec4:7aff:feda:3d7c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: pvoigt) by vm411.rz.uni-osnabrueck.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C83A530363C5; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 17:42:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: from laptop2.drpetervoigt.private (laptop2.drpetervoigt.private [192.168.1.7]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: pvoigt) by spock.drpetervoigt.eu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2F917C06AD; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 17:42:14 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2021 17:42:13 +0200 From: "Dr. Peter Voigt" To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Cc: Palle Girgensohn Subject: Port net-mgmt/telegraf does not build anymore since last version 1.19.3 Message-ID: <20210825174213.59f03d02@laptop2.drpetervoigt.private> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.8 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-PMX-Version: vm411.rz.uni-osnabrueck.de (Univ. Osnabrueck) with PMX 6.4.6.2792898, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.2107409, Antispam-Data: 2021.8.25.153316, AntiVirus-Engine: 5.84.0, AntiVirus-Data: 2021.8.25.5840000 X-PMX-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report= HTML_00_01 0.05, HTML_00_10 0.05, BODY_SIZE_3000_3999 0, BODY_SIZE_5000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_7000_LESS 0, FROM_NAME_PHRASE 0, MULTIPLE_REAL_RCPTS 0, __ANY_URI 0, __BODY_NO_MAILTO 0, __CC_NAME 0, __CC_NAME_DIFF_FROM_ACC 0, __CC_REAL_NAMES 0, __COURIER_PHRASE 0, __CP_URI_IN_BODY 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __FROM_DOMAIN_NOT_IN_BODY 0, __FROM_NAME_NOT_IN_BODY 0, __HAS_CC_HDR 0, __HAS_FROM 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __HEADER_ORDER_FROM 0, __HTTPS_URI 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_TEXT_P 0, __MIME_TEXT_P1 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __MSGID_DOMAIN_NOT_IN_HDRS 0, __MULTIPLE_URI_TEXT 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __TO_NO_NAME 0, __URI_HAS_HYPHEN_USC 0, __URI_IN_BODY 0, __URI_IN_BODY_HTTP_X10 0, __URI_NOT_IMG 0, __URI_NO_MAILTO 0, __URI_NO_WWW 0, __URI_WITHOUT_PATH 0, __URI_WITH_PATH 0 X-PMX-Spam-Level: IIIIIIII X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Gvqwm4kFWz3nLm X-Spamd-Bar: + Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of pvoigt@uos.de designates 2001:638:508:100::83ad:108f as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=pvoigt@uos.de X-Spamd-Result: default: False [1.36 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx:c]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[uos.de]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(1.00)[1.000]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.66)[0.664]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; FROM_NAME_HAS_TITLE(1.00)[dr]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:680, ipnet:2001:638::/32, country:DE]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N Version 1.19.2 net-mgmt/telegraf builds just fine on my system with FreeBSD 12.2-RELEASE-p10 (amd64). But version 1.19.3 gives the following error: ... ===>>> Waiting on fetch & checksum for net-mgmt/telegraf <<<=== # get https://proxy.golang.org/sigs.k8s.io/apiserver-network-proxy/konnectivity-client/@v/v0.0.14.zip # get https://proxy.golang.org/sigs.k8s.io/apiserver-network-proxy/konnectivity-client/@v/v0.0.14.zip: 200 OK (0.113s) # get https://proxy.golang.org/sigs.k8s.io/structured-merge-diff/v3/@v/v3.0.0.zip # get https://proxy.golang.org/sigs.k8s.io/structured-merge-diff/v3/@v/v3.0.0.zip: 200 OK (0.112s) # get https://proxy.golang.org/sigs.k8s.io/structured-merge-diff/v4/@v/v4.1.0.zip # get https://proxy.golang.org/sigs.k8s.io/structured-merge-diff/v4/@v/v4.1.0.zip: 200 OK (0.124s) # get https://proxy.golang.org/sigs.k8s.io/yaml/@v/v1.2.0.zip # get https://proxy.golang.org/sigs.k8s.io/yaml/@v/v1.2.0.zip: 200 OK (0.112s) # get https://proxy.golang.org/sourcegraph.com/sourcegraph/appdash/@v/v0.0.0-20190731080439-ebfcffb1b5c0.zip # get https://proxy.golang.org/sourcegraph.com/sourcegraph/appdash/@v/v0.0.0-20190731080439-ebfcffb1b5c0.zip: 200 OK (0.113s) ===> License MIT accepted by the user ===> telegraf-1.19.3 depends on file: /usr/local/sbin/pkg - found ===> telegraf-1.19.3 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/go - found ===> telegraf-1.19.3 depends on package: ca_root_nss>0 - found ===> Fetching all distfiles required by telegraf-1.19.3 for building ===> Fetching github.com/influxdata/telegraf dependencies ===> Extracting for telegraf-1.19.3 => SHA256 Checksum OK for go/net-mgmt_telegraf/telegraf-v1.19.3/v1.19.3.mod. => SHA256 Checksum OK for go/net-mgmt_telegraf/telegraf-v1.19.3/v1.19.3.zip. go: finding module for package github.com/Azure/go-amqp github.com/influxdata/telegraf/plugins/inputs/eventhub_consumer imports github.com/Azure/azure-event-hubs-go/v3 imports github.com/Azure/go-amqp: cannot find module providing package github.com/Azure/go-amqp: module lookup disabled by GOPROXY=off *** Error code 1 Stop. make: stopped in /usr/ports/net-mgmt/telegraf ===>>> make build failed for net-mgmt/telegraf ===>>> Aborting update ===>>> Update for net-mgmt/telegraf failed ===>>> Aborting update ===>>> You can restart from the point of failure with this command line: portmaster net-mgmt/telegraf This command has been saved to ~/portmasterfail.txt The message suggests on issue with my GOPROXY settings. I have not changed any GO settings, e.g. I am using defaults only: # env |grep -i proxy The above command yields no output. # go env |grep -i proxy GONOPROXY="" GOPROXY="https://proxy.golang.org,direct" I have contacted the port maintainer and he suggested to even remove the GO default setting. I tried: # go env -w GOPROXY=no according to https://golang.org/ref/mod#goproxy-protocol but the issue remains. I appreciate any hints into the right direction. Peter From nobody Wed Aug 25 21:40:02 2021 X-Original-To: ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78FCB179A215 for ; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 21:40:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lumiwa@dismail.de) Received: from mx1.dismail.de (mx1.dismail.de [78.46.223.134]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA512 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mx1.dismail.de", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Gvzsh1D1rz4mWL for ; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 21:40:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lumiwa@dismail.de) Received: from mx1.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 0d7edce4; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 23:40:06 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=dismail.de; h=date:from :to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=20190914; bh=HoQWx3S7 mzdmrDOz3o83xptUOPfoXCK5raBu3hx6BIM=; b=ZFUDHd+9X5oL09xY5jYvRd6O 1sgXL7p/Le4TAUbT0+w1R/CFm+9UfP7XhGA2JSodl2aGvdJg8+IwISxQaVAWUdgR c+cRbiBED4nnarStdagkpqsC0a9ozvlI/Lv9jEguasM4Fb1VoUPyVN3fILNUcDy3 P/p90oyjwkMeU26Oa7vc61zSmsPmEjd20Naqj+08IyG/JbGAwo9/n/ndDnaH5Ejb lT1w8MKwyVrih05GN1e1ADCOxe+YR8KwO5d+jvVp1QiZzgCJA7H8rh4KmVHVV4CF THpqS8AXN/uiogLTaSaD7nCYtltfuFC0zXY5pmDw4jhgxYjjbvBcG+wOHYtOFA== Received: from smtp2.dismail.de ( [10.240.26.12]) by mx1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 9be844fd; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 23:40:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp2.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp2.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 8128a86b; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 23:40:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: by dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 4c81b0fd (TLSv1.3:AEAD-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO); Wed, 25 Aug 2021 23:40:05 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2021 17:40:02 -0400 To: "Herbert J. Skuhra" Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gitup ports Message-ID: <20210825174002.6878e81d@dismail.de> In-Reply-To: References: <20210825035859.69854545@dismail.de> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.18.0 (GTK+ 2.24.33; amd64-portbld-freebsd13.0) List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Gvzsh1D1rz4mWL X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[] Reply-To: lumiwa@dismail.de From: LuMiWa via ports X-Original-From: LuMiWa X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N On Wed, 25 Aug 2021 10:26:00 +0200 "Herbert J. Skuhra" wrote: > On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 03:58:59AM -0400, LuMiWa via ports wrote: > > On FreeBSD 13.0-RELEASE-p4 I have a problem with gitup ports: > >=20 > > gitup ports > > # Scanning local repository... > > # Host: github.com > > # Port: 443 > > # Repository Path: /freebsd/freebsd-ports.git > > # Target Directory: /usr/ports > > # Commit History: yes > > # Have: 8ba9809ca02105b8d4de8fa794eb98e447fae8a8 > > # Want: 6234479982621235dc99824a812cd9ee11dbbf93 > > # Branch: main > > # Action: pull > > Segmentation fault (core dumped) >=20 > Try to update your gitup.conf and/or switch from github.com to > git.freebsd.org. >=20 > https://github.com/johnmehr/gitup/issues/73 > https://github.com/johnmehr/gitup/issues/74 >=20 > Or install git-tiny. >=20 Is it possible to switch back to portsnap and how, please. With portsnap I didn't have any problem from FreeBSD 6 Thank you. --=20 "Everyone thinks of changing the world, but no one thinks of changing himself.=E2=80=9D Leo Tolstoy From nobody Wed Aug 25 23:47:59 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A27F91783192 for ; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 23:48:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jonc@chen.org.nz) Received: from mail-ot1-x32d.google.com (mail-ot1-x32d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::32d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Gw2jd4FVRz3twt for ; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 23:48:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jonc@chen.org.nz) Received: by mail-ot1-x32d.google.com with SMTP id c19-20020a9d6153000000b0051829acbfc7so1129674otk.9 for ; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 16:48:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chen-org-nz.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=bJfrkQzCl1zffWuDzlGGnFnGQFclJt4xzGSmWi+C1/c=; b=0mG2Hx5XybuAJoAVbbCtWUnrEDwFHr6drkieBrK9aE8BYyBG5TK5SDchD23zkOje0O nt9GgFQ9R5oVxv+hllT0OR2avaGKqH3oxZoB28tVKv+vxfOyCkA8PqaMEq6eTONarx3o T8qDHRf0AC9SiFPq5E+szmtQQoPLrazoXA6kj+Dzs4nW0BhhBfpO69pyB73OYQxQkzmb TQOBan7qmc36B8jYZILsT5zHAkvboiIYb98VhblyCbROePcMEenm85L4TtIYiTA+V/mz 865XRPu6MslTK6lIdZaN6yazraibW1QntElpOGVUYz8dAZYSejPXtceiYxVn+PXyPZQE rEFw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=bJfrkQzCl1zffWuDzlGGnFnGQFclJt4xzGSmWi+C1/c=; b=Xb3J3sHlJbTBTnd2L7LmIe/aZfLM+27UEDIqr4ljrqWLJbGTOHvQ/0k6XIdEZChGx4 iNkKRYYg/M9Uo9rQDSYfSHmeLQcm4bRXo4kEDZIMaapG7tTKkxmCB5Lw9jBN/ZH8RrQW 5ipgnvZcXkvhaHiYqUEQrlnN2a7al/CdyRQEssotobzeVMTiMFF1SUUfjCg6folgN8jV 06v0TRFHSNAsXUBF78IBt3XfbkJ8HlnPgUVKo3S9cs388HwgCT9GlqaAU8LBjxtC0JGL r8Xm8YuvaxYsjbnjMUwFDhf8Oif33J2aiHr1+kPXATcVbDgnCBqpY9uq9Cdb6kyNm6yV o/ng== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5336KojILfV4MSFokTKoSiCvn/ASkpdAiGHSJwrAKcKlQ3g8e2Cy 91z6atqjtZCQRV12vbeuJP0TQzQUu/WX9C7SKawUOipNgGSdZQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzyv5uWtuT0McPDLwG6fgU+y8GMcIlPLsL/Vj8dLT+p8Xgqqtjri861lJoL0+47HjQCFFqeIx0l2fpUebRJW+c= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:314b:: with SMTP id c11mr792801ots.169.1629935294984; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 16:48:14 -0700 (PDT) List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Jonathan Chen Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2021 11:47:59 +1200 Message-ID: Subject: www/chromium 92.0.4515.159 failing on recent 13-STABLE To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, freebsd-chromium@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Gw2jd4FVRz3twt X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=chen-org-nz.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=0mG2Hx5X; dmarc=none; spf=softfail (mx1.freebsd.org: 2607:f8b0:4864:20::32d is neither permitted nor denied by domain of jonc@chen.org.nz) smtp.mailfrom=jonc@chen.org.nz X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.70 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[chen-org-nz.20150623.gappssmtp.com:s=20150623]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(1.00)[1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; R_SPF_SOFTFAIL(0.00)[~all:c]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[chen.org.nz]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(1.00)[1.000]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[chen-org-nz.20150623.gappssmtp.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::32d:from]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N Hi, I just updated 13-STABLE/am64 (stable/13-n246941-20f96f21556), which appears to introduced clang 12.0.1. Unfortunately, I am now getting build failures with www/chromium: [ 16% 7885/48415] cc -MMD -MF obj/third_party/nasm/nasm/assemble.o.d -DUSE_AURA=1 -DUSE_GLIB=1 -DUSE_NSS_CERTS=1 -DUSE_OZONE=1 -DUSE_X11=1 -DOFFI CIAL_BUILD -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -DNO_UNWIND_TABLES -D_GNU_SOURCE -DCR_CLANG_REVISION=\"llvmorg-13-ini t-10392-gd3676d4b-2\" -DNDEBUG -DNVALGRIND -DDYNAMIC_ANNOTATIONS_ENABLED=0 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I../.. -Igen -I../../third_party/nasm -I../../third_p arty/nasm/asm -I../../third_party/nasm/disasm -I../../third_party/nasm/include -I../../third_party/nasm/output -I../../third_party/nasm/x86 -fno- delete-null-pointer-checks -fno-ident -fno-strict-aliasing --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -fstack-protector -fno-unwind-tables -fno-asynchronous-unwin d-tables -fPIC -pthread -fcolor-diagnostics -fmerge-all-constants -flto=thin -fsplit-lto-unit -fwhole-program-vtables -m64 -march=x86-64 -msse3 - Xclang -fdebug-compilation-dir -Xclang . -no-canonical-prefixes -O2 -fdata-sections -ffunction-sections -fno-omit-frame-pointer -g0 -fprofile-ins tr-use=../../chrome/build/pgo_profiles/chrome-linux-4515-1627572323-7b80f2d12f40afe6f7872c5528a069e31662276b.profdata -Wno-profile-instr-unprofil ed -Wno-profile-instr-out-of-date -Wno-backend-plugin -fvisibility=hidden -Wheader-hygiene -Wstring-conversion -Wtautological-overlap-compare -Wa ll -Wno-unused-variable -Wno-missing-field-initializers -Wno-unused-parameter -Wno-c++11-narrowing -Wno-unneeded-internal-declaration -Wno-undefi ned-var-template -Wno-ignored-pragma-optimize -Wno-implicit-int-float-conversion -Wno-final-dtor-non-final-class -Wno-builtin-assume-aligned-alig nment -Wno-deprecated-copy -Wno-thread-safety-analysis -Wno-thread-safety-attributes -Wno-unused-function -Wno-string-conversion -Wno-macro-redef ined -Wno-sign-compare -Wno-nonnull -Wno-uninitialized -std=c11 -c ../../third_party/nasm/asm/assemble.c -o obj/third_party/nasm/nasm/assemble.o FAILED: obj/third_party/nasm/nasm/assemble.o cc -MMD -MF obj/third_party/nasm/nasm/assemble.o.d -DUSE_AURA=1 -DUSE_GLIB=1 -DUSE_NSS_CERTS=1 -DUSE_OZONE=1 -DUSE_X11=1 -DOFFICIAL_BUILD -D_FILE _OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -DNO_UNWIND_TABLES -D_GNU_SOURCE -DCR_CLANG_REVISION=\"llvmorg-13-init-10392-gd3676d4b- 2\" -DNDEBUG -DNVALGRIND -DDYNAMIC_ANNOTATIONS_ENABLED=0 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I../.. -Igen -I../../third_party/nasm -I../../third_party/nasm/asm -I.. /../third_party/nasm/disasm -I../../third_party/nasm/include -I../../third_party/nasm/output -I../../third_party/nasm/x86 -fno-delete-null-pointe r-checks -fno-ident -fno-strict-aliasing --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -fstack-protector -fno-unwind-tables -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables -fPIC -pt hread -fcolor-diagnostics -fmerge-all-constants -flto=thin -fsplit-lto-unit -fwhole-program-vtables -m64 -march=x86-64 -msse3 -Xclang -fdebug-com pilation-dir -Xclang . -no-canonical-prefixes -O2 -fdata-sections -ffunction-sections -fno-omit-frame-pointer -g0 -fprofile-instr-use=../../chrom e/build/pgo_profiles/chrome-linux-4515-1627572323-7b80f2d12f40afe6f7872c5528a069e31662276b.profdata -Wno-profile-instr-unprofiled -Wno-profile-in str-out-of-date -Wno-backend-plugin -fvisibility=hidden -Wheader-hygiene -Wstring-conversion -Wtautological-overlap-compare -Wall -Wno-unused-var iable -Wno-missing-field-initializers -Wno-unused-parameter -Wno-c++11-narrowing -Wno-unneeded-internal-declaration -Wno-undefined-var-template - Wno-ignored-pragma-optimize -Wno-implicit-int-float-conversion -Wno-final-dtor-non-final-class -Wno-builtin-assume-aligned-alignment -Wno-depreca ted-copy -Wno-thread-safety-analysis -Wno-thread-safety-attributes -Wno-unused-function -Wno-string-conversion -Wno-macro-redefined -Wno-sign-com pare -Wno-nonnull -Wno-uninitialized -std=c11 -c ../../third_party/nasm/asm/assemble.c -o obj/third_party/nasm/nasm/assemble.o In file included from ../../third_party/nasm/asm/assemble.c:178: ../../third_party/nasm/include/compiler.h:249:21: error: static declaration of 'mempcpy' follows non-static declaration static inline void *mempcpy(void *dst, const void *src, size_t n) ^ /usr/include/string.h:70:7: note: previous declaration is here Cheers. -- Jonathan Chen From nobody Thu Aug 26 08:06:44 2021 X-Original-To: ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B596E1770CC8 for ; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 08:06:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4GwFmh468zz4tTM for ; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 08:06:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (portscout.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6C73E47DC for ; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 08:06:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.nyi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.10]) by portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 17Q86iD9018491 for ; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 08:06:44 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 17Q86inf018490; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 08:06:44 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <202108260806.17Q86inf018490@portscout.nyi.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.nyi.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2021 08:06:44 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ devel/ocaml-re | 1.4.1 | 1.10.0 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ lang/csharp-mode.el | 0.9.2 | 1.0.2 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Reported by: portscout! From nobody Thu Aug 26 09:27:15 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6162A178676B for ; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 09:27:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pvoigt@uos.de) Received: from mta-out-1-1.rz.uni-osnabrueck.de (mta-out-1-1.rz.uni-osnabrueck.de [131.173.18.148]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4GwHZF1h3bz3qg6; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 09:27:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pvoigt@uos.de) Received: from vm412.rz.uni-osnabrueck.de (smtp-auth-2.serv.uni-osnabrueck.de [131.173.17.0]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mta-out-1-1.rz.uni-osnabrueck.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DDD636E41; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 11:27:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: from spock.drpetervoigt.eu (spock.drpetervoigt.eu [217.91.107.36]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: pvoigt) by vm412.rz.uni-osnabrueck.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BF09916D32A2; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 11:27:19 +0200 (CEST) Received: from laptop2.drpetervoigt.private (laptop2.drpetervoigt.private [192.168.1.7]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: pvoigt) by spock.drpetervoigt.eu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2FBC945F51; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 11:27:17 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2021 11:27:15 +0200 From: "Dr. Peter Voigt" To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Cc: Palle Girgensohn Subject: Re: Port net-mgmt/telegraf does not build anymore since last version 1.19.3 Message-ID: <20210826112715.7f8403c4@laptop2.drpetervoigt.private> In-Reply-To: <70617_1629906147_612664E3_70617_13169_1_20210825174213.59f03d02@laptop2.drpetervoigt.private> References: <70617_1629906147_612664E3_70617_13169_1_20210825174213.59f03d02@laptop2.drpetervoigt.private> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.8 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-PMX-Version: vm412.rz.uni-osnabrueck.de (Univ. Osnabrueck) with PMX 6.4.6.2792898, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.2107409, Antispam-Data: 2021.8.26.91816, AntiVirus-Engine: 5.85.0, AntiVirus-Data: 2021.8.25.5850003 X-PMX-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report= HTML_00_01 0.05, HTML_00_10 0.05, BODY_SIZE_3000_3999 0, BODY_SIZE_5000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_7000_LESS 0, FROM_NAME_PHRASE 0, IN_REP_TO 0, MSG_THREAD 0, MULTIPLE_REAL_RCPTS 0, REFERENCES 0, __ANY_URI 0, __BODY_NO_MAILTO 0, __BOUNCE_CHALLENGE_SUBJ 0, __BOUNCE_NDR_SUBJ_EXEMPT 0, __CC_NAME 0, __CC_NAME_DIFF_FROM_ACC 0, __CC_REAL_NAMES 0, __COURIER_PHRASE 0, __CP_URI_IN_BODY 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __FORWARDED_MSG 0, __FROM_DOMAIN_NOT_IN_BODY 0, __HAS_CC_HDR 0, __HAS_FROM 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __HAS_REFERENCES 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __HEADER_ORDER_FROM 0, __HTTPS_URI 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_TEXT_P 0, __MIME_TEXT_P1 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __MSGID_DOMAIN_NOT_IN_HDRS 0, __MULTIPLE_URI_TEXT 0, __REFERENCES 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __SUBJ_ALPHA_NEGATE 0, __SUBJ_REPLY 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __TO_NO_NAME 0, __URI_HAS_HYPHEN_USC 0, __URI_IN_BODY 0, __URI_IN_BODY_HTTP_X10 0, __URI_MAILTO 0, __URI_NOT_IMG 0, __URI_NO_WWW 0, __URI_WITHOUT_PATH 0, __URI_WITH_PATH 0 X-PMX-Spam-Level: IIIIIIII X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4GwHZF1h3bz3qg6 X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of pvoigt@uos.de designates 131.173.18.148 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=pvoigt@uos.de X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.70 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:131.173.16.0/22]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[uos.de]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED(-0.40)[131.173.18.148:from,131.173.17.0:received]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; FROM_NAME_HAS_TITLE(1.00)[dr]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:680, ipnet:131.173.0.0/16, country:DE]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N On Wed, 25 Aug 2021 17:42:13 +0200 "Dr. Peter Voigt" wrote: Well, yesterday night I removed packages go and telegraf and removed all corresponding files from /usr/ports/dist. Subsequently, both port lang/go and net-mgmt/telegraf (1.19.3) could be built without any issues. My conclusion so far: Either upgrade of lang/go or of net-mgmt/telegraf could not be performed cleanly for whatever reason. Peter > Version 1.19.2 net-mgmt/telegraf builds just fine on my system with > FreeBSD 12.2-RELEASE-p10 (amd64). > > But version 1.19.3 gives the following error: > > ... > > ===>>> Waiting on fetch & checksum for net-mgmt/telegraf <<<=== > # get > https://proxy.golang.org/sigs.k8s.io/apiserver-network-proxy/konnectivity-client/@v/v0.0.14.zip > # get > https://proxy.golang.org/sigs.k8s.io/apiserver-network-proxy/konnectivity-client/@v/v0.0.14.zip: > 200 OK (0.113s) # get > https://proxy.golang.org/sigs.k8s.io/structured-merge-diff/v3/@v/v3.0.0.zip > # get > https://proxy.golang.org/sigs.k8s.io/structured-merge-diff/v3/@v/v3.0.0.zip: > 200 OK (0.112s) # get > https://proxy.golang.org/sigs.k8s.io/structured-merge-diff/v4/@v/v4.1.0.zip > # get > https://proxy.golang.org/sigs.k8s.io/structured-merge-diff/v4/@v/v4.1.0.zip: > 200 OK (0.124s) # get > https://proxy.golang.org/sigs.k8s.io/yaml/@v/v1.2.0.zip # get > https://proxy.golang.org/sigs.k8s.io/yaml/@v/v1.2.0.zip: 200 OK > (0.112s) # get > https://proxy.golang.org/sourcegraph.com/sourcegraph/appdash/@v/v0.0.0-20190731080439-ebfcffb1b5c0.zip > # get > https://proxy.golang.org/sourcegraph.com/sourcegraph/appdash/@v/v0.0.0-20190731080439-ebfcffb1b5c0.zip: > 200 OK (0.113s) > > > ===> License MIT accepted by the user > ===> telegraf-1.19.3 depends on file: /usr/local/sbin/pkg - found > ===> telegraf-1.19.3 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/go - found > ===> telegraf-1.19.3 depends on package: ca_root_nss>0 - found > ===> Fetching all distfiles required by telegraf-1.19.3 for building > ===> Fetching github.com/influxdata/telegraf dependencies > ===> Extracting for telegraf-1.19.3 > => SHA256 Checksum OK for > go/net-mgmt_telegraf/telegraf-v1.19.3/v1.19.3.mod. => SHA256 Checksum > OK for go/net-mgmt_telegraf/telegraf-v1.19.3/v1.19.3.zip. go: finding > module for package github.com/Azure/go-amqp > github.com/influxdata/telegraf/plugins/inputs/eventhub_consumer > imports github.com/Azure/azure-event-hubs-go/v3 imports > github.com/Azure/go-amqp: cannot find module providing package > github.com/Azure/go-amqp: module lookup disabled by GOPROXY=off *** > Error code 1 > > Stop. > make: stopped in /usr/ports/net-mgmt/telegraf > > ===>>> make build failed for net-mgmt/telegraf > ===>>> Aborting update > > ===>>> Update for net-mgmt/telegraf failed > ===>>> Aborting update > > > ===>>> You can restart from the point of failure with this command > line: portmaster net-mgmt/telegraf > > This command has been saved to ~/portmasterfail.txt > > The message suggests on issue with my GOPROXY settings. I have not > changed any GO settings, e.g. I am using defaults only: > > # env |grep -i proxy > The above command yields no output. > > # go env |grep -i proxy > GONOPROXY="" > GOPROXY="https://proxy.golang.org,direct" > > I have contacted the port maintainer and he suggested to even remove > the GO default setting. I tried: > # go env -w GOPROXY=no > according to https://golang.org/ref/mod#goproxy-protocol but the issue > remains. > > I appreciate any hints into the right direction. > > Peter > From nobody Thu Aug 26 09:33:56 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93E7E178A102 for ; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 09:34:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from girgen@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail.pingpong.net (mail.pingpong.net [109.228.164.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4GwHjZ350Lz3sRc for ; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 09:34:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from girgen@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtpclient.apple (h-213-80-111-226.NA.cust.bahnhof.se [213.80.111.226]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.pingpong.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A58C0435E2; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 11:33:51 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.120.0.1.13\)) Subject: Re: Port net-mgmt/telegraf does not build anymore since last version 1.19.3 From: Palle Girgensohn In-Reply-To: <20210826112715.7f8403c4@laptop2.drpetervoigt.private> Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2021 11:33:56 +0200 Cc: "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <70617_1629906147_612664E3_70617_13169_1_20210825174213.59f03d02@laptop2.drpetervoigt.private> <20210826112715.7f8403c4@laptop2.drpetervoigt.private> To: "Dr. Peter Voigt" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.120.0.1.13) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4GwHjZ350Lz3sRc X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N I would guess that some distfiles from github where actually bad. I've = seen github downloads giving differents checksums for the same version = at times recently. Perhaps they had a bug there, and you got bitten by = it? Palle > 26 aug. 2021 kl. 11:27 skrev Dr. Peter Voigt : >=20 > On Wed, 25 Aug 2021 17:42:13 +0200 > "Dr. Peter Voigt" wrote: >=20 > Well, yesterday night I removed packages go and telegraf and removed > all corresponding files from /usr/ports/dist. Subsequently, both port > lang/go and net-mgmt/telegraf (1.19.3) could be built without any > issues. >=20 > My conclusion so far: Either upgrade of lang/go or of = net-mgmt/telegraf > could not be performed cleanly for whatever reason. >=20 > Peter >=20 >=20 >> Version 1.19.2 net-mgmt/telegraf builds just fine on my system with >> FreeBSD 12.2-RELEASE-p10 (amd64). >>=20 >> But version 1.19.3 gives the following error: >>=20 >> ... >>=20 >> =3D=3D=3D>>> Waiting on fetch & checksum for net-mgmt/telegraf <<<=3D=3D= =3D >> # get >> = https://proxy.golang.org/sigs.k8s.io/apiserver-network-proxy/konnectivity-= client/@v/v0.0.14.zip >> # get >> = https://proxy.golang.org/sigs.k8s.io/apiserver-network-proxy/konnectivity-= client/@v/v0.0.14.zip: >> 200 OK (0.113s) # get >> = https://proxy.golang.org/sigs.k8s.io/structured-merge-diff/v3/@v/v3.0.0.zi= p >> # get >> = https://proxy.golang.org/sigs.k8s.io/structured-merge-diff/v3/@v/v3.0.0.zi= p: >> 200 OK (0.112s) # get >> = https://proxy.golang.org/sigs.k8s.io/structured-merge-diff/v4/@v/v4.1.0.zi= p >> # get >> = https://proxy.golang.org/sigs.k8s.io/structured-merge-diff/v4/@v/v4.1.0.zi= p: >> 200 OK (0.124s) # get >> https://proxy.golang.org/sigs.k8s.io/yaml/@v/v1.2.0.zip # get >> https://proxy.golang.org/sigs.k8s.io/yaml/@v/v1.2.0.zip: 200 OK >> (0.112s) # get >> = https://proxy.golang.org/sourcegraph.com/sourcegraph/appdash/@v/v0.0.0-201= 90731080439-ebfcffb1b5c0.zip >> # get >> = https://proxy.golang.org/sourcegraph.com/sourcegraph/appdash/@v/v0.0.0-201= 90731080439-ebfcffb1b5c0.zip: >> 200 OK (0.113s) >>=20 >>=20 >> =3D=3D=3D> License MIT accepted by the user >> =3D=3D=3D> telegraf-1.19.3 depends on file: /usr/local/sbin/pkg - = found >> =3D=3D=3D> telegraf-1.19.3 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/go - = found >> =3D=3D=3D> telegraf-1.19.3 depends on package: ca_root_nss>0 - = found >> =3D=3D=3D> Fetching all distfiles required by telegraf-1.19.3 for = building >> =3D=3D=3D> Fetching github.com/influxdata/telegraf dependencies >> =3D=3D=3D> Extracting for telegraf-1.19.3 >> =3D> SHA256 Checksum OK for >> go/net-mgmt_telegraf/telegraf-v1.19.3/v1.19.3.mod. =3D> SHA256 = Checksum >> OK for go/net-mgmt_telegraf/telegraf-v1.19.3/v1.19.3.zip. go: finding >> module for package github.com/Azure/go-amqp >> github.com/influxdata/telegraf/plugins/inputs/eventhub_consumer >> imports github.com/Azure/azure-event-hubs-go/v3 imports >> github.com/Azure/go-amqp: cannot find module providing package >> github.com/Azure/go-amqp: module lookup disabled by GOPROXY=3Doff *** >> Error code 1 >>=20 >> Stop. >> make: stopped in /usr/ports/net-mgmt/telegraf >>=20 >> =3D=3D=3D>>> make build failed for net-mgmt/telegraf >> =3D=3D=3D>>> Aborting update >>=20 >> =3D=3D=3D>>> Update for net-mgmt/telegraf failed >> =3D=3D=3D>>> Aborting update >>=20 >>=20 >> =3D=3D=3D>>> You can restart from the point of failure with this = command >> line: portmaster net-mgmt/telegraf=20 >>=20 >> This command has been saved to ~/portmasterfail.txt >>=20 >> The message suggests on issue with my GOPROXY settings. I have not >> changed any GO settings, e.g. I am using defaults only: >>=20 >> # env |grep -i proxy >> The above command yields no output. >>=20 >> # go env |grep -i proxy >> GONOPROXY=3D"" >> GOPROXY=3D"https://proxy.golang.org,direct" >>=20 >> I have contacted the port maintainer and he suggested to even remove >> the GO default setting. I tried: >> # go env -w GOPROXY=3Dno >> according to https://golang.org/ref/mod#goproxy-protocol but the = issue >> remains. >>=20 >> I appreciate any hints into the right direction. >>=20 >> Peter >>=20 >=20 From nobody Thu Aug 26 11:50:04 2021 X-Original-To: ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2C33179E6F6 for ; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 11:50:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ronald-lists@klop.ws) Received: from smarthost1.greenhost.nl (smarthost1.greenhost.nl [195.190.28.88]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4GwLkl4FNHz3HqD for ; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 11:50:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ronald-lists@klop.ws) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=klop.ws; s=mail; h=In-Reply-To:Message-ID:From:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version: Date:References:Subject:To:Content-Type:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=HcOaS0oMposEyP6NhZ3crpUBWDeBM+0emyggjsWMDzM=; b=aWTBFkstram8JQvY6HuFpaYB7H HXUCR4IOg10DmgTAcpufYy26KIHzOQX1xsD1+/A83m4Qw+ZKSvNZABpbcvCHQSujIWpoz1O7L1Tbp 3GHYLPAx1Ca4I26NhV5jYJRbjbaLc0rTKtg8vQ7GTG/ZwrVIyiRRGcbLO06JS+5nt89M=; Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15; format=flowed; delsp=yes To: "Herbert J. Skuhra" , "LuMiWa via ports" , lumiwa@dismail.de Subject: Re: gitup ports References: <20210825035859.69854545@dismail.de> <20210825174002.6878e81d@dismail.de> Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2021 13:50:04 +0200 List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "Ronald Klop" Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20210825174002.6878e81d@dismail.de> User-Agent: Opera Mail/1.0 (Win32) X-Authenticated-As-Hash: bdb49c4ff80bd276e321aade33e76e02752072e2 X-Virus-Scanned: by clamav at smarthost1.greenhost.nl X-Spam-Level: --- X-Spam-Score: -3.1 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.1 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF autolearn=disabled version=3.4.2 X-Scan-Signature: 66f4fda096222dd2b2010deb1ce817c5 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4GwLkl4FNHz3HqD X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N On Wed, 25 Aug 2021 23:40:02 +0200, LuMiWa via ports wrote: > On Wed, 25 Aug 2021 10:26:00 +0200 > "Herbert J. Skuhra" wrote: > >> On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 03:58:59AM -0400, LuMiWa via ports wrote: >> > On FreeBSD 13.0-RELEASE-p4 I have a problem with gitup ports: >> > >> > gitup ports >> > # Scanning local repository... >> > # Host: github.com >> > # Port: 443 >> > # Repository Path: /freebsd/freebsd-ports.git >> > # Target Directory: /usr/ports >> > # Commit History: yes >> > # Have: 8ba9809ca02105b8d4de8fa794eb98e447fae8a8 >> > # Want: 6234479982621235dc99824a812cd9ee11dbbf93 >> > # Branch: main >> > # Action: pull >> > Segmentation fault (core dumped) >> >> Try to update your gitup.conf and/or switch from github.com to >> git.freebsd.org. >> >> https://github.com/johnmehr/gitup/issues/73 >> https://github.com/johnmehr/gitup/issues/74 >> >> Or install git-tiny. >> > > Is it possible to switch back to portsnap and how, please. With > portsnap I didn't have any problem from FreeBSD 6 > > Thank you. Yes AFAIK the portsnap servers get the data from git nowadays. If I run "portsnap fetch" I get a snapshot of today so it seems to work fine. See "man portsnap": EXAMPLES Fetch the snapshots and create the ports(7) tree under /usr/ports: portsnap fetch extract Update the ports tree: portsnap fetch update Regards, Ronald. From nobody Thu Aug 26 16:33:05 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 056811781AC9; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 16:33:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alexvpetrov@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lf1-x12d.google.com (mail-lf1-x12d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4GwT1162qkz4TvC; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 16:33:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alexvpetrov@gmail.com) Received: by mail-lf1-x12d.google.com with SMTP id i9so8079517lfg.10; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 09:33:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=90uTDm2fStwARQvOhifbMZqVJVxqPt/3LuVc4UjLttg=; b=DNsLIVMnYGGC4e1T7KO+w0g1eQT/L1nnkRZEQXOnJbkvTFm2VK85jXX+uhMrEBRFVo E12bB5h24Bvtz2KmwyIjBXx2P9j/gTdXb12UDA3QwEoRF4+BFdQENpkgKWEzGWGQW6vG HVyRr2864Fuux48rdr/pQyiPr9yLzQDgbIzQBjln5xDp2RfilN+DcdnQ4cxqua0/WLZR F214qCp68f9Jfikp3kzaxsf+GRhMYQcoSGk7ztd6wvCuBfE22U4A1r8zDaHtLQz8mHa5 SIUhq+ot/9TB/rYrD0JrKFomNACgj5ceNB084mDPFpz8DBDbzz+KcSMlIyTjqAYHazoM o+pg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=90uTDm2fStwARQvOhifbMZqVJVxqPt/3LuVc4UjLttg=; b=CwmKp5f5lrJsiWpa/mnNR1h637vrbwxgIXdI2Ckxx++37c6RsrnDgcBvyVxTrUvdsp 4bLiwzmEMFtJGgxlK2Gt0koodF0Wosi8rX2cyvVCADVvC6wr1tZ+mCE/oBGiWHjUUsNS QudWCkOOslXr23UguHDo1/VxylpbOu8EzRF5/J/a29jIJOHZsmSeorHBU/+mUfXNRgSC kv+FUPJXFzNYG92/xvaQ9eiTcenwGqKlfzsPrt8M/aAMAnfuqGIl7b69SVss0Fh1qRvU n37csUGWmuqgEDh593jExtnBU1ubF8sdijbMs50BV1+6MnPsHi/xZFffRqPqUmQXBIGV USMg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533gBoVU6JN+9Uu/MtfcAfZDXYLjgdvO/TQtk8Aw8z9rwzFQHS6S qcHpMjFihBJtKlkmTUdvjoiLXtaPC/s= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwXHCKQZ02jhs3nSZ1JESrPDF82qOe/gI9vZLgpOWuCukg6Mh3oQXoB4nA9gHyR1N1Si4CDKA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:6c4:: with SMTP id u4mr3396403lff.373.1629995588047; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 09:33:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from alex.super (stone.g-service.ru. [84.22.141.217]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id e19sm391250ljj.28.2021.08.26.09.33.07 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 26 Aug 2021 09:33:07 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: www/chromium 92.0.4515.159 failing on recent 13-STABLE To: Jonathan Chen , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, freebsd-chromium@freebsd.org References: From: "Alex V. Petrov" Message-ID: <7d0a301c-886a-7667-5d8c-f55a7e41386c@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2021 23:33:05 +0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0 List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: ru X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4GwT1162qkz4TvC X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N 26.08.2021 06:47, Jonathan Chen пишет: > Hi, > > I just updated 13-STABLE/am64 (stable/13-n246941-20f96f21556), which > appears to introduced clang 12.0.1. Unfortunately, I am now getting > build failures with www/chromium: > > [ 16% 7885/48415] cc -MMD -MF obj/third_party/nasm/nasm/assemble.o.d > -DUSE_AURA=1 -DUSE_GLIB=1 -DUSE_NSS_CERTS=1 -DUSE_OZONE=1 -DUSE_X11=1 > -DOFFI > CIAL_BUILD -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE > -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -DNO_UNWIND_TABLES -D_GNU_SOURCE > -DCR_CLANG_REVISION=\"llvmorg-13-ini > t-10392-gd3676d4b-2\" -DNDEBUG -DNVALGRIND > -DDYNAMIC_ANNOTATIONS_ENABLED=0 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I../.. -Igen > -I../../third_party/nasm -I../../third_p > arty/nasm/asm -I../../third_party/nasm/disasm > -I../../third_party/nasm/include -I../../third_party/nasm/output > -I../../third_party/nasm/x86 -fno- > delete-null-pointer-checks -fno-ident -fno-strict-aliasing > --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -fstack-protector -fno-unwind-tables > -fno-asynchronous-unwin > d-tables -fPIC -pthread -fcolor-diagnostics -fmerge-all-constants > -flto=thin -fsplit-lto-unit -fwhole-program-vtables -m64 -march=x86-64 > -msse3 - > Xclang -fdebug-compilation-dir -Xclang . -no-canonical-prefixes -O2 > -fdata-sections -ffunction-sections -fno-omit-frame-pointer -g0 > -fprofile-ins > tr-use=../../chrome/build/pgo_profiles/chrome-linux-4515-1627572323-7b80f2d12f40afe6f7872c5528a069e31662276b.profdata > -Wno-profile-instr-unprofil > ed -Wno-profile-instr-out-of-date -Wno-backend-plugin > -fvisibility=hidden -Wheader-hygiene -Wstring-conversion > -Wtautological-overlap-compare -Wa > ll -Wno-unused-variable -Wno-missing-field-initializers > -Wno-unused-parameter -Wno-c++11-narrowing > -Wno-unneeded-internal-declaration -Wno-undefi > ned-var-template -Wno-ignored-pragma-optimize > -Wno-implicit-int-float-conversion -Wno-final-dtor-non-final-class > -Wno-builtin-assume-aligned-alig > nment -Wno-deprecated-copy -Wno-thread-safety-analysis > -Wno-thread-safety-attributes -Wno-unused-function > -Wno-string-conversion -Wno-macro-redef > ined -Wno-sign-compare -Wno-nonnull -Wno-uninitialized -std=c11 -c > ../../third_party/nasm/asm/assemble.c -o > obj/third_party/nasm/nasm/assemble.o > FAILED: obj/third_party/nasm/nasm/assemble.o > cc -MMD -MF obj/third_party/nasm/nasm/assemble.o.d -DUSE_AURA=1 > -DUSE_GLIB=1 -DUSE_NSS_CERTS=1 -DUSE_OZONE=1 -DUSE_X11=1 > -DOFFICIAL_BUILD -D_FILE > _OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE > -DNO_UNWIND_TABLES -D_GNU_SOURCE > -DCR_CLANG_REVISION=\"llvmorg-13-init-10392-gd3676d4b- > 2\" -DNDEBUG -DNVALGRIND -DDYNAMIC_ANNOTATIONS_ENABLED=0 > -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I../.. -Igen -I../../third_party/nasm > -I../../third_party/nasm/asm -I.. > /../third_party/nasm/disasm -I../../third_party/nasm/include > -I../../third_party/nasm/output -I../../third_party/nasm/x86 > -fno-delete-null-pointe > r-checks -fno-ident -fno-strict-aliasing --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 > -fstack-protector -fno-unwind-tables -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables > -fPIC -pt > hread -fcolor-diagnostics -fmerge-all-constants -flto=thin > -fsplit-lto-unit -fwhole-program-vtables -m64 -march=x86-64 -msse3 > -Xclang -fdebug-com > pilation-dir -Xclang . -no-canonical-prefixes -O2 -fdata-sections > -ffunction-sections -fno-omit-frame-pointer -g0 > -fprofile-instr-use=../../chrom > e/build/pgo_profiles/chrome-linux-4515-1627572323-7b80f2d12f40afe6f7872c5528a069e31662276b.profdata > -Wno-profile-instr-unprofiled -Wno-profile-in > str-out-of-date -Wno-backend-plugin -fvisibility=hidden > -Wheader-hygiene -Wstring-conversion -Wtautological-overlap-compare > -Wall -Wno-unused-var > iable -Wno-missing-field-initializers -Wno-unused-parameter > -Wno-c++11-narrowing -Wno-unneeded-internal-declaration > -Wno-undefined-var-template - > Wno-ignored-pragma-optimize -Wno-implicit-int-float-conversion > -Wno-final-dtor-non-final-class -Wno-builtin-assume-aligned-alignment > -Wno-depreca > ted-copy -Wno-thread-safety-analysis -Wno-thread-safety-attributes > -Wno-unused-function -Wno-string-conversion -Wno-macro-redefined > -Wno-sign-com > pare -Wno-nonnull -Wno-uninitialized -std=c11 -c > ../../third_party/nasm/asm/assemble.c -o > obj/third_party/nasm/nasm/assemble.o > In file included from ../../third_party/nasm/asm/assemble.c:178: > ../../third_party/nasm/include/compiler.h:249:21: error: static > declaration of 'mempcpy' follows non-static declaration > static inline void *mempcpy(void *dst, const void *src, size_t n) > ^ > /usr/include/string.h:70:7: note: previous declaration is here > > Cheers. I have some problem. ----- Alex. -- ----- Alex. From nobody Thu Aug 26 21:49:12 2021 X-Original-To: ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5F121777741 for ; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 21:49:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lumiwa@dismail.de) Received: from mx1.dismail.de (mx1.dismail.de [78.46.223.134]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA512 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mx1.dismail.de", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Gwc1x3J9Bz50lW for ; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 21:49:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lumiwa@dismail.de) Received: from mx1.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 625c3313; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 23:49:16 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=dismail.de; h=date:from :to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=20190914; bh=l0Qimp/u tHQ48daTlCdPuOxDYpqYKmf2LcRa98JnumY=; b=fLau7ubzkOn/nqM8/fe1+9tE CJISlMx0k/o61xv6GtCDJ+e+WVB0NfdSsM/HGVsSyUL/n9cx3Uanf6aC2qXjoLUG WWvt4x/NgLF7CMQz9yJD3+9LX068MpmZ+7HPvmY+YVD++i6WahWVOAmui7MOlcPa xF+VQ6i6Sasg7MS5Bl9g/9tv1xYc8ywboKBvZ3UJ+ean0Qx4kNSyKezXRj+eD2j5 88suhtkJ6QQV0ywUSqkjxD6AVpOEwZ+tFAVwbrSIfnFqVhaNc60v5/oQokRvqQjP aFQtG/jgyDY+dtNcKslwWJMegnUq3og7h6FwAPxUXacWjMCJdWLrOVhrOY6whQ== Received: from smtp2.dismail.de ( [10.240.26.12]) by mx1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 712c1723; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 23:49:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp2.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp2.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 59885b64; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 23:49:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: by dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 34e78716 (TLSv1.3:AEAD-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO); Thu, 26 Aug 2021 23:49:15 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2021 17:49:12 -0400 To: "Ronald Klop" Cc: "Herbert J. Skuhra" , "LuMiWa via ports" Subject: Re: gitup ports Message-ID: <20210826174912.28a9ed49@dismail.de> In-Reply-To: References: <20210825035859.69854545@dismail.de> <20210825174002.6878e81d@dismail.de> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.18.0 (GTK+ 2.24.33; amd64-portbld-freebsd13.0) List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Gwc1x3J9Bz50lW X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[] Reply-To: lumiwa@dismail.de From: LuMiWa via ports X-Original-From: LuMiWa X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N On Thu, 26 Aug 2021 13:50:04 +0200 "Ronald Klop" wrote: > On Wed, 25 Aug 2021 23:40:02 +0200, LuMiWa via ports > wrote: >=20 > > On Wed, 25 Aug 2021 10:26:00 +0200 > > "Herbert J. Skuhra" wrote: > > > >> On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 03:58:59AM -0400, LuMiWa via ports wrote: > >> > On FreeBSD 13.0-RELEASE-p4 I have a problem with gitup ports: > >> > > >> > gitup ports > >> > # Scanning local repository... > >> > # Host: github.com > >> > # Port: 443 > >> > # Repository Path: /freebsd/freebsd-ports.git > >> > # Target Directory: /usr/ports > >> > # Commit History: yes > >> > # Have: 8ba9809ca02105b8d4de8fa794eb98e447fae8a8 > >> > # Want: 6234479982621235dc99824a812cd9ee11dbbf93 > >> > # Branch: main > >> > # Action: pull > >> > Segmentation fault (core dumped) > >> > >> Try to update your gitup.conf and/or switch from github.com to > >> git.freebsd.org. > >> > >> https://github.com/johnmehr/gitup/issues/73 > >> https://github.com/johnmehr/gitup/issues/74 > >> > >> Or install git-tiny. > >> > > > > Is it possible to switch back to portsnap and how, please. With > > portsnap I didn't have any problem from FreeBSD 6 > > > > Thank you. >=20 >=20 > Yes AFAIK the portsnap servers get the data from git nowadays. If I > run "portsnap fetch" I get a snapshot of today so it seems to work > fine. >=20 > See "man portsnap": >=20 > EXAMPLES > Fetch the snapshots and create the ports(7) tree under > /usr/ports: portsnap fetch extract >=20 > Update the ports tree: > portsnap fetch update >=20 > Regards, > Ronald. >=20 Thank you very much. Looks like the same as was before... --=20 "Everyone thinks of changing the world, but no one thinks of changing himself.=E2=80=9D Leo Tolstoy From nobody Thu Aug 26 23:29:40 2021 X-Original-To: ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50FDB178D0C8 for ; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 23:29:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd@herrneubauer.de) Received: from mailproxy03.manitu.net (mailproxy03.manitu.net [IPv6:2a00:1828:1000:1108::2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4GwfFp3xq6z3l1Z for ; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 23:29:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd@herrneubauer.de) Received: from shodan.wg.home (200116b864b728001ac04dfffe357d8e.dip.versatel-1u1.de [IPv6:2001:16b8:64b7:2800:1ac0:4dff:fe35:7d8e]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: martin@herrneubauer.de) by mailproxy03.manitu.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1CBFB12A077D for ; Fri, 27 Aug 2021 01:29:41 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: www/chromium 92.0.4515.159 failing on recent 13-STABLE To: ports@freebsd.org References: From: Martin Neubauer Message-ID: <66356b7d-04d4-26cb-8ff2-27270a825138@herrneubauer.de> Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2021 01:29:40 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0 List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="SLXyFH8rziCIY0Ew4SaR4Plkxh2dX4Bk7" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4GwfFp3xq6z3l1Z X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of fbsd@herrneubauer.de designates 2a00:1828:1000:1108::2 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=fbsd@herrneubauer.de X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.97 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a00:1828:1000:1106::/59]; MIME_GOOD(-0.20)[multipart/signed,multipart/mixed,text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[ports@freebsd.org]; HAS_ATTACHMENT(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.56)[0.560]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[herrneubauer.de]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.13)[-0.127]; SIGNED_PGP(-2.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:+,3:~]; ASN(0.00)[asn:34240, ipnet:2a00:1828::/32, country:DE]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[2001:16b8:64b7:2800:1ac0:4dff:fe35:7d8e:received] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --SLXyFH8rziCIY0Ew4SaR4Plkxh2dX4Bk7 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="bvDYvJ1HVezAYolFzZ3wQyTcSHnYWCHPo"; protected-headers="v1" From: Martin Neubauer To: ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <66356b7d-04d4-26cb-8ff2-27270a825138@herrneubauer.de> Subject: Re: www/chromium 92.0.4515.159 failing on recent 13-STABLE References: In-Reply-To: --bvDYvJ1HVezAYolFzZ3wQyTcSHnYWCHPo Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, Maybe this could help: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D257352 Cheers, Martin On 26/08/2021 01:47, Jonathan Chen wrote: > Hi, >=20 > I just updated 13-STABLE/am64 (stable/13-n246941-20f96f21556), which > appears to introduced clang 12.0.1. Unfortunately, I am now getting > build failures with www/chromium: >=20 > [ 16% 7885/48415] cc -MMD -MF obj/third_party/nasm/nasm/assemble.o.d > -DUSE_AURA=3D1 -DUSE_GLIB=3D1 -DUSE_NSS_CERTS=3D1 -DUSE_OZONE=3D1 -DUSE= _X11=3D1 > -DOFFI > CIAL_BUILD -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=3D64 -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE > -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -DNO_UNWIND_TABLES -D_GNU_SOURCE > -DCR_CLANG_REVISION=3D\"llvmorg-13-ini > t-10392-gd3676d4b-2\" -DNDEBUG -DNVALGRIND > -DDYNAMIC_ANNOTATIONS_ENABLED=3D0 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I../.. -Igen > -I../../third_party/nasm -I../../third_p > arty/nasm/asm -I../../third_party/nasm/disasm > -I../../third_party/nasm/include -I../../third_party/nasm/output > -I../../third_party/nasm/x86 -fno- > delete-null-pointer-checks -fno-ident -fno-strict-aliasing > --param=3Dssp-buffer-size=3D4 -fstack-protector -fno-unwind-tables > -fno-asynchronous-unwin > d-tables -fPIC -pthread -fcolor-diagnostics -fmerge-all-constants > -flto=3Dthin -fsplit-lto-unit -fwhole-program-vtables -m64 -march=3Dx86= -64 > -msse3 - > Xclang -fdebug-compilation-dir -Xclang . -no-canonical-prefixes -O2 > -fdata-sections -ffunction-sections -fno-omit-frame-pointer -g0 > -fprofile-ins > tr-use=3D../../chrome/build/pgo_profiles/chrome-linux-4515-1627572323-7= b80f2d12f40afe6f7872c5528a069e31662276b.profdata > -Wno-profile-instr-unprofil > ed -Wno-profile-instr-out-of-date -Wno-backend-plugin > -fvisibility=3Dhidden -Wheader-hygiene -Wstring-conversion > -Wtautological-overlap-compare -Wa > ll -Wno-unused-variable -Wno-missing-field-initializers > -Wno-unused-parameter -Wno-c++11-narrowing > -Wno-unneeded-internal-declaration -Wno-undefi > ned-var-template -Wno-ignored-pragma-optimize > -Wno-implicit-int-float-conversion -Wno-final-dtor-non-final-class > -Wno-builtin-assume-aligned-alig > nment -Wno-deprecated-copy -Wno-thread-safety-analysis > -Wno-thread-safety-attributes -Wno-unused-function > -Wno-string-conversion -Wno-macro-redef > ined -Wno-sign-compare -Wno-nonnull -Wno-uninitialized -std=3Dc11 -c > ../../third_party/nasm/asm/assemble.c -o > obj/third_party/nasm/nasm/assemble.o > FAILED: obj/third_party/nasm/nasm/assemble.o > cc -MMD -MF obj/third_party/nasm/nasm/assemble.o.d -DUSE_AURA=3D1 > -DUSE_GLIB=3D1 -DUSE_NSS_CERTS=3D1 -DUSE_OZONE=3D1 -DUSE_X11=3D1 > -DOFFICIAL_BUILD -D_FILE > _OFFSET_BITS=3D64 -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE > -DNO_UNWIND_TABLES -D_GNU_SOURCE > -DCR_CLANG_REVISION=3D\"llvmorg-13-init-10392-gd3676d4b- > 2\" -DNDEBUG -DNVALGRIND -DDYNAMIC_ANNOTATIONS_ENABLED=3D0 > -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I../.. -Igen -I../../third_party/nasm > -I../../third_party/nasm/asm -I.. > /../third_party/nasm/disasm -I../../third_party/nasm/include > -I../../third_party/nasm/output -I../../third_party/nasm/x86 > -fno-delete-null-pointe > r-checks -fno-ident -fno-strict-aliasing --param=3Dssp-buffer-size=3D4 > -fstack-protector -fno-unwind-tables -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables > -fPIC -pt > hread -fcolor-diagnostics -fmerge-all-constants -flto=3Dthin > -fsplit-lto-unit -fwhole-program-vtables -m64 -march=3Dx86-64 -msse3 > -Xclang -fdebug-com > pilation-dir -Xclang . -no-canonical-prefixes -O2 -fdata-sections > -ffunction-sections -fno-omit-frame-pointer -g0 > -fprofile-instr-use=3D../../chrom > e/build/pgo_profiles/chrome-linux-4515-1627572323-7b80f2d12f40afe6f7872= c5528a069e31662276b.profdata > -Wno-profile-instr-unprofiled -Wno-profile-in > str-out-of-date -Wno-backend-plugin -fvisibility=3Dhidden > -Wheader-hygiene -Wstring-conversion -Wtautological-overlap-compare > -Wall -Wno-unused-var > iable -Wno-missing-field-initializers -Wno-unused-parameter > -Wno-c++11-narrowing -Wno-unneeded-internal-declaration > -Wno-undefined-var-template - > Wno-ignored-pragma-optimize -Wno-implicit-int-float-conversion > -Wno-final-dtor-non-final-class -Wno-builtin-assume-aligned-alignment > -Wno-depreca > ted-copy -Wno-thread-safety-analysis -Wno-thread-safety-attributes > -Wno-unused-function -Wno-string-conversion -Wno-macro-redefined > -Wno-sign-com > pare -Wno-nonnull -Wno-uninitialized -std=3Dc11 -c > ../../third_party/nasm/asm/assemble.c -o > obj/third_party/nasm/nasm/assemble.o > In file included from ../../third_party/nasm/asm/assemble.c:178: > ../../third_party/nasm/include/compiler.h:249:21: error: static > declaration of 'mempcpy' follows non-static declaration > static inline void *mempcpy(void *dst, const void *src, size_t n) > ^ > /usr/include/string.h:70:7: note: previous declaration is here >=20 > Cheers. >=20 --bvDYvJ1HVezAYolFzZ3wQyTcSHnYWCHPo-- --SLXyFH8rziCIY0Ew4SaR4Plkxh2dX4Bk7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="OpenPGP_signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="OpenPGP_signature" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- wsF5BAABCAAjFiEEz37w2Of3zyk7IGo6VAonOSklu3oFAmEoI+QFAwAAAAAACgkQVAonOSklu3qT SRAAnSN/46FsweaRTGchh0l6HJ6KJLPare3wJfbslZ7GusCfS4AEyiHs2x6b8pSkxeKn6tg4b9pg 8c7SCHW7zUwxBs2WqH+hp88e6Ko4hzMvs639JgJcGA/dJtl5UyHpELMYwfKQGqrZTocznuKuH7xI wV4dOT5NLn7xJh/3Q88QGT+GCpodUtJtoKSJgh5OQYOz6nb3pYqaUUZzR/lKU0RD3Y4eC5u/jtW+ CHcuQYcWQNruREjwxqfPWlEryw1dA587RI4pjTSLSZ4eToy2SBqtjx+bAjNdFvF3Dijslbj14Coh kB7W6cSYT5kB+1BBH0IEGVQqnSeM4cx1GmW0TwHT7v3I746Yukjjbld4oHgwJNzJ/152fjTp24pT vAswKz40S6meyUddXLvEOsGzBbSmxftuX7SqPp6R4YWx5pca5IuoAQxB0dj6Arq4mmGq/qMbKisd 04gS042Jxe5Qv9yi/KoIClJZGUQYm2fwxOdsEUPwciEUKemfRJMbD5vbXRafbWLSCJFqbc7m+I3X KPezrKoeIwTcllGGak0NTGiJ2+GdXGSQ1ibt0IKOt1G1L6/5hubhddqXUUeL5K1RceV2sM6VCJWM HALGAKIRJVm4EdyTY73sEwT6pj40+6CZtFVGmTqK2v4t8hhvKyIWLqDjLK0LI2h0n84ePMpo8wRJ kwE= =QIAj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --SLXyFH8rziCIY0Ew4SaR4Plkxh2dX4Bk7-- From nobody Fri Aug 27 12:51:22 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 833EA17860AC for ; Fri, 27 Aug 2021 12:51:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-ports@freebsd.org) Received: from nodset0.westsarproperty.com (nodset0.westsarproperty.com [91.194.55.51]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Gx02t4BqDz3k4Z for ; Fri, 27 Aug 2021 12:51:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-ports@freebsd.org) From: Notice To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Ownership Confirmation - 8/27/2021 12:51:21 p.m. Date: 27 Aug 2021 12:51:22 +0000 Message-ID: <20210827125121.3ABF1FB2F3A68B0C@freebsd.org> List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Gx02t4BqDz3k4Z X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.00 / 15.00]; ASN(0.00)[asn:209737, ipnet:91.194.55.0/24, country:TR]; local_wl_from(0.00)[freebsd.org] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: Y New Page 3
 
We have stopped processing incoming emails
 
NOTE:  
 
Supported by freebsd.org
From nobody Fri Aug 27 13:36:20 2021 X-Original-To: ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEA33179CD3A for ; Fri, 27 Aug 2021 13:36:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ports@freebsd.org) Received: from nodset3.westsarproperty.com (nodset3.westsarproperty.com [91.194.55.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Gx12c3Vf7z4TQ1 for ; Fri, 27 Aug 2021 13:36:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ports@freebsd.org) From: Notice To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Ownership Confirmation - 8/27/2021 1:36:20 p.m. Date: 27 Aug 2021 13:36:20 +0000 Message-ID: <20210827133620.39444AA9084078F5@freebsd.org> List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Gx12c3Vf7z4TQ1 X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.00 / 15.00]; local_wl_from(0.00)[freebsd.org]; ASN(0.00)[asn:209737, ipnet:91.194.55.0/24, country:TR] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: Y New Page 3
 
We have stopped processing incoming emails
 
NOTE:  
 
Supported by freebsd.org
From nobody Fri Aug 27 16:46:00 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E5301799086 for ; Fri, 27 Aug 2021 16:46:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eduardo@freebsd.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::24b:4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Gx5Fc2fyHz4rJH for ; Fri, 27 Aug 2021 16:46:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eduardo@freebsd.org) Received: from mail-lj1-f177.google.com (mail-lj1-f177.google.com [209.85.208.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) (Authenticated sender: eduardo) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3A6212E79F for ; Fri, 27 Aug 2021 16:46:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eduardo@freebsd.org) Received: by mail-lj1-f177.google.com with SMTP id i28so12499564ljm.7 for ; Fri, 27 Aug 2021 09:46:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533ER3GnYyXDj9lGvoIPvwWrhVvaOkE8E1UpVmCDD7gs95g8ZzTf VHaFkLgX+ruv5xbtpstZVt9MCPHCKyOeBb02AJA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwIZikjEQpwrvURSFyPU0KqyVts04yULjGLWCgS80Dnf/eVV0+/twj1+8V3Vn6YH9xZqAiJcY0dquoNTvC+q40= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:7814:: with SMTP id t20mr8524125ljc.13.1630082770557; Fri, 27 Aug 2021 09:46:10 -0700 (PDT) List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Nuno Teixeira Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2021 17:46:00 +0100 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: committing 2 ports at same time, commit message not accepted To: FreeBSD Mailing List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000007e601205ca8d38e2" X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: Y --0000000000007e601205ca8d38e2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hello, I'm trying to commit 2 ports at same time: security/p5-openxpki and security/p5-openxpki-i18n because they share same distribution. I get an error when I push saying that I need to respect "category/portname: ..." My commit message was: "security/p5-openxpki, security/p5-openxpki-i18n: Update to 3.14.4" Can I do a commit message starting with: security/p5-openxpki: Update to 3.14.4 security/p5-openxpki-i18n: Update to 3.14.4 or I need to separate commits? Thanks, Nuno Teixeira --0000000000007e601205ca8d38e2-- From nobody Fri Aug 27 16:56:02 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48C58179D6B2 for ; Fri, 27 Aug 2021 16:56:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lars@e.0x20.net) Received: from mail.0x20.net (mail.0x20.net [46.251.251.56]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Gx5T80xCvz4vlg; Fri, 27 Aug 2021 16:56:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lars@e.0x20.net) Received: from e.0x20.net (mail.0x20.net [46.251.251.56]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail.0x20.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A29828D6A5; Fri, 27 Aug 2021 18:56:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from lars@localhost) by e.0x20.net (8.16.1/8.16.1/Submit) id 17RGu2js013118; Fri, 27 Aug 2021 18:56:02 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from lars) Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2021 18:56:02 +0200 From: Lars Engels To: Nuno Teixeira Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: committing 2 ports at same time, commit message not accepted Message-ID: References: List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Editor: VIM - Vi IMproved 8.0 User-Agent: Mutt/2.0.6 (2021-03-06) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Gx5T80xCvz4vlg X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 05:46:00PM +0100, Nuno Teixeira wrote: > Hello, > > I'm trying to commit 2 ports at same time: > > security/p5-openxpki and security/p5-openxpki-i18n because they share same > distribution. > > I get an error when I push saying that I need to respect > "category/portname: ..." > > My commit message was: > "security/p5-openxpki, security/p5-openxpki-i18n: Update to 3.14.4" > > Can I do a commit message starting with: > security/p5-openxpki: Update to 3.14.4 > security/p5-openxpki-i18n: Update to 3.14.4 > > or I need to separate commits? > You can use :* From nobody Fri Aug 27 16:59:07 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3160E179E32D for ; Fri, 27 Aug 2021 16:59:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eduardo@freebsd.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::24b:4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Gx5Xl0vTCz3CDt for ; Fri, 27 Aug 2021 16:59:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eduardo@freebsd.org) Received: from mail-lf1-f54.google.com (mail-lf1-f54.google.com [209.85.167.54]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) (Authenticated sender: eduardo) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 017472E902 for ; Fri, 27 Aug 2021 16:59:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eduardo@freebsd.org) Received: by mail-lf1-f54.google.com with SMTP id j4so15678727lfg.9 for ; Fri, 27 Aug 2021 09:59:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM53267kyYtyCeaNPoeXKThFufoY/xOOM5UFYrHyX6f7TaE559BnLJ oaiL5B7N6aMTy3Du6SIo3yZzurDk+GNCdba5emw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxXwX7gJQ8R546mtwQKNTpwN905NdtiIxKMjtT4n8w0nX3J6pGvW42JBz9Zbf/S7mQvuztqnesc4qUWSEkjQv4= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:1501:: with SMTP id bq1mr7473346lfb.36.1630083557433; Fri, 27 Aug 2021 09:59:17 -0700 (PDT) List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Nuno Teixeira Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2021 17:59:07 +0100 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: committing 2 ports at same time, commit message not accepted To: Lars Engels Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000652a5305ca8d67a0" X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: Y --000000000000652a5305ca8d67a0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable For this port update history: security/p5-openxpki*: Update to 3.14.4 Is that ok? Lars Engels escreveu no dia sexta, 27/08/2021 =C3=A0= (s) 17:56: > On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 05:46:00PM +0100, Nuno Teixeira wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I'm trying to commit 2 ports at same time: > > > > security/p5-openxpki and security/p5-openxpki-i18n because they share > same > > distribution. > > > > I get an error when I push saying that I need to respect > > "category/portname: ..." > > > > My commit message was: > > "security/p5-openxpki, security/p5-openxpki-i18n: Update to 3.14.4" > > > > Can I do a commit message starting with: > > security/p5-openxpki: Update to 3.14.4 > > security/p5-openxpki-i18n: Update to 3.14.4 > > > > or I need to separate commits? > > > > You can use > > :* > --000000000000652a5305ca8d67a0-- From nobody Fri Aug 27 17:56:08 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD2C51791886 for ; Fri, 27 Aug 2021 17:56:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@freebsd.org) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Gx6pV57CFz3kHQ; Fri, 27 Aug 2021 17:56:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@freebsd.org) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.94.2 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1mJg5I-0007mD-Ci; Fri, 27 Aug 2021 19:56:08 +0200 Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2021 19:56:08 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Nuno Teixeira Cc: Lars Engels , FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: committing 2 ports at same time, commit message not accepted Message-ID: References: List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Gx6pV57CFz3kHQ X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N Hi! > For this port update history: > > security/p5-openxpki*: Update to 3.14.4 > > Is that ok? Yes. -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 Now what ? From nobody Sat Aug 28 16:48:39 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FD841790DB9 for ; Sat, 28 Aug 2021 16:48:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from masterone@o0l0o.org) Received: from www118.your-server.de (www118.your-server.de [88.198.193.6]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4GxjG16Mdjz4npS for ; Sat, 28 Aug 2021 16:48:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from masterone@o0l0o.org) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=o0l0o.org; s=default_1810; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Date: To:From:Subject:Message-ID:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To:References; bh=HCLFDxmXecqhvxOCfO+F0ejJFIVyJujrqKWPf91oNJg=; b=CC +JLxaxUinezwnEeapaFrqvF6YNImU898w5G7XjWDGzM7GUsaaPsyhXtwaJiV0gtJZRwF2HxjOZLDA FA4cEI0ROp+3Vw+rJnKIcooU2xxR7ow4CNlypE/cr2EVOTZIjGVUXsu/S69f7BnUc/20oyIXBejGz 8MzFqOO5Exw6GQRTRmc8KyW4mvEpaBVAMok8KnAkxJJBu1F3KBIhvxQXuYf2jgsf0v1CF8r4BDNZm hlA5SVyYXGHf++Xh+YS18KDsVcO9JlIv0wpJVS2kMAcTpQqsyZs4gGDqKOxuOpFkSKb8F3fWHfOPx n8oeiqiEXxljDvi+JqRD+uKljUukVBMw==; Received: from sslproxy02.your-server.de ([78.47.166.47]) by www118.your-server.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92.3) (envelope-from ) id 1mK1VZ-0001Av-3E for freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org; Sat, 28 Aug 2021 18:48:41 +0200 Received: from [5.253.207.86] (helo=[10.8.8.21]) by sslproxy02.your-server.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mK1VY-0002Yr-SA for freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org; Sat, 28 Aug 2021 18:48:40 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: [REQUEST] Portfolio Performance To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2021 18:48:39 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.40.4 List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authenticated-Sender: master@o0l0o.org X-Virus-Scanned: Clear (ClamAV 0.103.2/26277/Sat Aug 28 10:21:18 2021) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4GxjG16Mdjz4npS X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=o0l0o.org header.s=default_1810 header.b="CC +JLxa"; dmarc=pass (policy=reject) header.from=o0l0o.org; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of masterone@o0l0o.org designates 88.198.193.6 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=masterone@o0l0o.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.99 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[o0l0o.org:s=default_1810]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx:c]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[o0l0o.org:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[o0l0o.org,reject]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.99)[-0.995]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:88.198.0.0/16, country:DE]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; HAS_X_AS(0.00)[] Reply-To: masterone@o0l0o.org From: Master One via freebsd-ports X-Original-From: Master One X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N Portfolio Performance - An open source tool to calculate the overall performance of an investment portfolio - across all accounts - using True-Time Weighted Return or Internal Rate of Return. Website: https://www.portfolio-performance.info/en/ GitHub: https://github.com/buchen/portfolio Prerequisites: Java 11, Maven, Eclipse I was looking for something self-hosted web-based and found Firefly III being mentioned, though the developer of Firefly III says that it's not really the best solution for that purpose and that he is using Portfolio Performance himself. Portfolio Performance really is the one and only free portfolio management software that is referred to from all directions, as there seems to be nothing else that comes anywhere close, so this surely would make a fine addition to FreeBSD desktop use. From nobody Sat Aug 28 21:45:42 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE08F17AC0B8 for ; Sat, 28 Aug 2021 21:45:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dave@horsfall.org) Received: from nsstlmta13p.bpe.bigpond.com (nsstlmta13p.bpe.bigpond.com [203.38.21.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "", Issuer "Openwave Messaging Inc." (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Gxqry492Nz3QSt for ; Sat, 28 Aug 2021 21:45:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dave@horsfall.org) Received: from smtp.telstra.com ([10.10.24.4]) by nsstlfep13p-svc.bpe.nexus.telstra.com.au with ESMTP id <20210828214544.SUMZ6430.nsstlfep13p-svc.bpe.nexus.telstra.com.au@smtp.telstra.com> for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2021 07:45:44 +1000 X-RG-Spam: Unknown X-RazorGate-Vade: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvtddrudduiedgtdefucetufdoteggodetrfdotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuuffpveftpgfvgffnuffvtfetpdfqfgfvnecuuegrihhlohhuthemucegtddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenucfjughrpeffhffvufgjkfhffgggtgesthdttddttdervdenucfhrhhomhepffgrvhgvucfjohhrshhfrghllhcuoegurghvvgeshhhorhhsfhgrlhhlrdhorhhgqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeekieetjeeuuefhfeeguedvudeifeevudfgvedtffekhfffjeekhfdutdetheethfenucfkphepuddutddrudeguddrudelfedrvdeffeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhephhgvlhhopegrnhgvuhhrihhnrdhhohhrshhfrghllhdrohhrghdpihhnvghtpeduuddtrddugedurdduleefrddvfeefpdhmrghilhhfrhhomhepuggrvhgvsehhohhrshhfrghllhdrohhrghdprhgtphhtthhopehfrhgvvggsshguqdhpohhrthhssehfrhgvvggsshgurdhorhhg X-RazorGate-Vade-Verdict: clean 0 X-RazorGate-Vade-Classification: clean X-RG-VS-CLASS: clean Received: from aneurin.horsfall.org (110.141.193.233) by smtp.telstra.com (5.8.716.02) id 610B5E2105096131 for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Sun, 29 Aug 2021 07:45:43 +1000 Received: from aneurin.horsfall.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by aneurin.horsfall.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 17SLjhoH063238 for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2021 07:45:43 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from dave@horsfall.org) Received: from localhost (dave@localhost) by aneurin.horsfall.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) with ESMTP id 17SLjg4v063235 for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2021 07:45:43 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from dave@horsfall.org) X-Authentication-Warning: aneurin.horsfall.org: dave owned process doing -bs Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2021 07:45:42 +1000 (EST) From: Dave Horsfall To: FreeBSD Ports Subject: Re: [REQUEST] Portfolio Performance In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.21.9999 (BSF 287 2018-06-16) X-GPG-Public-Key: http://www.horsfall.org/gpgkey.pub X-GPG-Fingerprint: 05B4 FFBC 0218 B438 66E0 587B EF46 7357 EF5E F58B X-Home-Page: http://www.horsfall.org/ X-Witty-Saying: "chmod 666 the_mode_of_the_beast" List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Gxqry492Nz3QSt X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of dave@horsfall.org has no SPF policy when checking 203.38.21.13) smtp.mailfrom=dave@horsfall.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.20 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; RCVD_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[203.38.21.13:from]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; HAS_XAW(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROMTLD(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[horsfall.org]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:1221, ipnet:203.36.0.0/14, country:AU]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[203.38.21.13:from] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N Is it just me, or does this look suspiciously like an advert? -- Dave From nobody Sat Aug 28 22:41:54 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1B5817A3FEC for ; Sat, 28 Aug 2021 22:42:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from leeb@ratnaling.org) Received: from mail-ot1-x329.google.com (mail-ot1-x329.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::329]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Gxs5p5Hv0z3wTl for ; Sat, 28 Aug 2021 22:42:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from leeb@ratnaling.org) Received: by mail-ot1-x329.google.com with SMTP id k12-20020a056830150c00b0051abe7f680bso13042664otp.1 for ; Sat, 28 Aug 2021 15:42:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ratnaling-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=g3TTecqUGFRFZr00bOfUYwvEjFnWHXB3ZHprUA0Ibso=; b=M51hjlkKx2V68TLn3P4RktUNAW/gRyH1GzbQ9OQ+WDDBczduslCqdIsVqqr1H8WCRf hKbSqrl0VJUEMGChZFaR+Xi3fCg+5X+fvHC11sGUEEijOAGQmVt5pWl9FqbpAsqd3SD5 apfV9P0sofNbSQ1IRRSHXOz352rwLEZ3rb5/2BoH/Pwd5qBwLEKJXCNow8YlU1gDI4Ur 5h+Ek+AyzBkXrpSQRxrA7Etmf1Dlx7aiQFMnGjjqVsia1mBF1JJxkDfPyjuu1IB6Js7J cqnohhniioM6lnUFU5rvrPLqpgXhRKUkcxWDAtSZnmvNetQL/eEhNBJbxereC5r5+yoj AnkQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=g3TTecqUGFRFZr00bOfUYwvEjFnWHXB3ZHprUA0Ibso=; b=IOX7j+tFy62C31R4tN7cQeaS7k9Oa389iDVkmR9OnN6bJBqGgA6vlWV2HtPrZjfIko PioeJuC57mpnPNaHRlWAioDfpnnrx4JNAgctMW8p8ozMKz4T9AbId7BeB7EwXWzU1QWu UIPmdtRTQcuGkGVZ/YEpPzfmZyDflKFsyBofJMsmqJGj/UIfCsxqS3vEfInnRlGvushA avQAVZEthAVYrWQOV0QZCPGmqhzyw0xwyffcOiPDiwwUGgcLPe+3stVEU5KNI6UptnNX d4WY5VTm9CpM9B8pb69zCNDtwCNmIiTurnJgvRKkoVONa0MAOJDEfoKcXlJk+uXO9IjN OWGQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532heqbAazOxqIDxgf/RuxfkDaLQkEvhStHCdhhDLFWqUCn19QZK sv0QF5R1mz83YepiyqBKRhR1CYCfuAQMgM3xjXcjITrCGLY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx7Tv5202N9iOHPxNbrTw+Trv8JPN6lXtsV4DgfADkjZCaEE3tfpltrJmgWhhuST7myfKs95or+bBfQ8uZJNbI= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:118a:: with SMTP id u10mr13880485otq.32.1630190525792; Sat, 28 Aug 2021 15:42:05 -0700 (PDT) List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Lee Brown Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2021 15:41:54 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [REQUEST] Portfolio Performance To: Dave Horsfall Cc: FreeBSD Ports Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000034d06105caa64f0f" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Gxs5p5Hv0z3wTl X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: Y --00000000000034d06105caa64f0f Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" It's meant to be a port request, i.e. will somebody please port this to FreeBSD, but badly worded. I marked it as SPAM before I saw the forum post where SirDice pointed them to this ML. So no, not just you :) On Sat, Aug 28, 2021 at 2:46 PM Dave Horsfall wrote: > Is it just me, or does this look suspiciously like an advert? > > -- Dave > > --00000000000034d06105caa64f0f-- From nobody Sun Aug 29 02:06:00 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CD8E1788E7D for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2021 02:06:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from masterone@o0l0o.org) Received: from www118.your-server.de (www118.your-server.de [88.198.193.6]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Gxxd70M1dz3tLF for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2021 02:06:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from masterone@o0l0o.org) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=o0l0o.org; s=default_1810; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version:Content-Type: References:In-Reply-To:Date:To:From:Subject:Message-ID:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID; bh=VteXjDb4cZzSHK47KzTw4u+vzV0Nu0XP0ISl6xDsHks=; b=YMdJVrjHA3bQNjyqwhS5Gtf8Po YSgGbLeV0PwsRRNgsxKvgxT90VuCVeNRuugHBbhNCiouUGTU9BEOP/ulcYQjJdLtQpQhAFlYTxPFR 55t4siXd3Gz/ht2kP7go8CAJFMino/g8mFtJLXlbLG0UqIydhyn1sQlGV/Ut+EbjUS/Xt4PYEfhkj 1fdDOdWkxn8s5DuLbg3azguGjIz7zOB2ACcF2zD0g1H9BkaIP1U2Y+bmXp0L8iSKvfZLdlbMOD2Jn IRGxKPfilVJK78eqrcdFG6hMHCmRbH+EcSiQvYKHZWdNmiGoeb+4GKhEfM6yBusJIY0mK8GJn3kZi sommG3Fg==; Received: from sslproxy02.your-server.de ([78.47.166.47]) by www118.your-server.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92.3) (envelope-from ) id 1mKACv-0001FI-ID for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Sun, 29 Aug 2021 04:06:01 +0200 Received: from [5.253.207.86] (helo=[10.8.8.21]) by sslproxy02.your-server.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mKACv-0003ue-Cx for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Sun, 29 Aug 2021 04:06:01 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [REQUEST] Portfolio Performance To: FreeBSD Ports Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2021 04:06:00 +0200 In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.40.4 List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Authenticated-Sender: master@o0l0o.org X-Virus-Scanned: Clear (ClamAV 0.103.2/26277/Sat Aug 28 10:21:18 2021) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Gxxd70M1dz3tLF X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=o0l0o.org header.s=default_1810 header.b=YMdJVrjH; dmarc=pass (policy=reject) header.from=o0l0o.org; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of masterone@o0l0o.org designates 88.198.193.6 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=masterone@o0l0o.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.00 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[o0l0o.org:s=default_1810]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(1.00)[1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[o0l0o.org:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[o0l0o.org,reject]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:88.198.0.0/16, country:DE]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; HAS_X_AS(0.00)[] Reply-To: masterone@o0l0o.org From: Master One via freebsd-ports X-Original-From: Master One X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N Not an advert or SPAM, but indeed just a port request ;) Though not sure how this classifies as badly worded and how I should have written that request differently. On Sat, 2021-08-28 at 15:41 -0700, Lee Brown wrote: > It's meant to be a port request, i.e. will somebody please port this > to > FreeBSD, but badly worded. > > I marked it as SPAM before I saw the forum post where SirDice pointed > them > to this ML.  So no, not just you :) > > On Sat, Aug 28, 2021 at 2:46 PM Dave Horsfall > wrote: > > > Is it just me, or does this look suspiciously like an advert? > > > > -- Dave From nobody Sun Aug 29 02:34:03 2021 X-Original-To: ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4206179D642 for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2021 02:34:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@raf.org) Received: from ook.raf.org (ook.raf.org [139.99.156.21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4GxyFp2lwHz4Vk2 for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2021 02:34:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@raf.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ook.raf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 302C95E4FD for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2021 12:34:08 +1000 (AEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at ook.raf.org Received: from ook.raf.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ook.raf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Nzo5cZ3Op0dv for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2021 12:34:03 +1000 (AEST) Received: by ook.raf.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 7F87C61B8C; Sun, 29 Aug 2021 12:34:03 +1000 (AEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=raf.org; s=001; t=1630204443; bh=nyJZASxL+5hZvreO43pTz/FWaoDFtXButWeQHKLdAOw=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=VPFQ7bh8AqZuOaJuNJvB0QN2R29yp5EBzRS7KbQnX8CXES5BomgB1HFNwmniLcZxx SsYAonTxIcU8WWulfu5ycx+ESa63gA3DhJRMiONS9Rb5tIaelouriR46cThR0pcGFk 62VeaEqLc1s4/TgZV6Daqe+rkX1gVufCnev847roi1b+6sDm5E5j7lFLydXgDOUgJT mO0moOamHv+6K1uZZFfjJyc4WEsmaC5OAvypUANrr0LjePsSMFHR1GHswQOxQttr2d 9sz/tr8eEnq997ttfdX+jzgC8OS1g8CQrRIn0m2oacO9B+g7QT6UwcVgp71msvoEOq 3FHJ0Hfp2L7Jw== Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2021 12:34:03 +1000 To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [REQUEST] Portfolio Performance Message-ID: References: List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4GxyFp2lwHz4Vk2 X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=raf.org header.s=001 header.b=VPFQ7bh8; dmarc=pass (policy=quarantine) header.from=raf.org; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of freebsd@raf.org designates 139.99.156.21 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=freebsd@raf.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.99 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[raf.org:s=001]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:139.99.156.21]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[ports@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[raf.org:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[raf.org,quarantine]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[139.99.156.21:from]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.99)[-0.991]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:16276, ipnet:139.99.128.0/17, country:FR]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[] Reply-To: freebsd@raf.org From: raf via ports X-Original-From: raf X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N On Sun, Aug 29, 2021 at 04:06:00AM +0200, Master One via freebsd-ports wrote: > Not an advert or SPAM, but indeed just a port request ;) > > Though not sure how this classifies as badly worded and how I should > have written that request differently. > > > On Sat, 2021-08-28 at 15:41 -0700, Lee Brown wrote: > > It's meant to be a port request, i.e. will somebody please port this > > to > > FreeBSD, but badly worded. > > > > I marked it as SPAM before I saw the forum post where SirDice pointed > > them > > to this ML.  So no, not just you :) > > > > On Sat, Aug 28, 2021 at 2:46 PM Dave Horsfall > > wrote: > > > > > Is it just me, or does this look suspiciously like an advert? > > > > > > -- Dave I think it makes sense that a request for a new port explain why the software is worth porting. I can also imagine that it might be difficult to do this in a way that doesn't sound like an advertisement for the software. After all, the request is an attempt to entice an existing porter to take on additional work. That's inherently an attempt at persuasion. The porting documentation I've seen only covers creating a new port, not asking someone else to do so, or giving advice on how best to do that. I suppose the implicit recommendation is to learn about FreeBSD porting, create the port, submit it, and hope that it gets accepted: https://docs.freebsd.org/en/books/porters-handbook/book/ There's a big learning curve, but on the plus side, once you've created your first port, it should be much easier the next time. :-) cheers, raf From nobody Sun Aug 29 02:42:28 2021 X-Original-To: ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC60217A0983 for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2021 02:42:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from masterone@o0l0o.org) Received: from www118.your-server.de (www118.your-server.de [88.198.193.6]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4GxyRB3JSwz4Y9Y for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2021 02:42:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from masterone@o0l0o.org) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=o0l0o.org; s=default_1810; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version:Content-Type: References:In-Reply-To:Date:To:From:Subject:Message-ID:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID; bh=nkJcXubJIvjargXXiPDd6oCtUGrmqiwa39/kshKnbKg=; b=EXhrDPydhw8yg32bP+Q+5rSIuN 1xtofKPSGIXvEPtAoP/Z/QFLzhF1YLAn3RdAY9NlbJVSltXp/GY2jWxGiwt0hxjVHjmfpbA8OhOTs ZWwMiW2YrBZIZYsymogwj2lY5qlSElkuWFLkyit7OA8CO96U/jOpk2GqT1ic+DdkQjtnqd+VYwcuI Ys69R57hhwrojIllOKozhT5RvCMZ5Kl4OOuWmAFXbk/cJvVZbcG8H9jYhfNoq4pWu2CBdBIYufh9Z l6fV9b4SpbaW5HLF4yC4oj4T2mkmNsc9hC1DptXxaYtlBdcEODP+vJV7bMSEzv76aBKHRNPg+mG/+ gUqp3a8w==; Received: from sslproxy03.your-server.de ([88.198.220.132]) by www118.your-server.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92.3) (envelope-from ) id 1mKAmD-00051l-Dr for ports@freebsd.org; Sun, 29 Aug 2021 04:42:29 +0200 Received: from [5.253.207.86] (helo=[10.8.8.21]) by sslproxy03.your-server.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mKAmD-000GK4-8R for ports@freebsd.org; Sun, 29 Aug 2021 04:42:29 +0200 Message-ID: <5586012f9adea958e541191f7598eda1cfc5d8d6.camel@o0l0o.org> Subject: Re: [REQUEST] Portfolio Performance To: ports@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2021 04:42:28 +0200 In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.40.4 List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Authenticated-Sender: master@o0l0o.org X-Virus-Scanned: Clear (ClamAV 0.103.2/26277/Sat Aug 28 10:21:18 2021) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4GxyRB3JSwz4Y9Y X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=o0l0o.org header.s=default_1810 header.b=EXhrDPyd; dmarc=pass (policy=reject) header.from=o0l0o.org; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of masterone@o0l0o.org designates 88.198.193.6 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=masterone@o0l0o.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.81 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[o0l0o.org:s=default_1810]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx:c]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[o0l0o.org:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[o0l0o.org,reject]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.81)[-0.810]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:88.198.0.0/16, country:DE]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; HAS_X_AS(0.00)[] Reply-To: masterone@o0l0o.org From: Master One via ports X-Original-From: Master One X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N Maybe I should have mentioned that I'm not a FreeBSD user yet, but just checking out the possibility to replace Arch Linux on my laptop. I know about the Porters Handbook, but I'm not a developer or programmer, so diving in that deep may not be an option for me (I possibly would if I could, but then it may be a question of available time to learn all that's necessary and actually do it). I thought maybe I can gain the interest of someone who is capable and would find use of that software for himself. On Sun, 2021-08-29 at 12:34 +1000, raf via ports wrote: > On Sun, Aug 29, 2021 at 04:06:00AM +0200, Master One via freebsd- > ports wrote: > > > Not an advert or SPAM, but indeed just a port request ;) > > > > Though not sure how this classifies as badly worded and how I > > should > > have written that request differently. > > > > > > On Sat, 2021-08-28 at 15:41 -0700, Lee Brown wrote: > > > It's meant to be a port request, i.e. will somebody please port > > > this > > > to > > > FreeBSD, but badly worded. > > > > > > I marked it as SPAM before I saw the forum post where SirDice > > > pointed > > > them > > > to this ML.  So no, not just you :) > > > > > > On Sat, Aug 28, 2021 at 2:46 PM Dave Horsfall > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Is it just me, or does this look suspiciously like an advert? > > > > > > > > -- Dave > > I think it makes sense that a request for a new port > explain why the software is worth porting. I can also > imagine that it might be difficult to do this in a way > that doesn't sound like an advertisement for the > software. After all, the request is an attempt to > entice an existing porter to take on additional work. > That's inherently an attempt at persuasion. > > The porting documentation I've seen only covers > creating a new port, not asking someone else to do so, > or giving advice on how best to do that. > > I suppose the implicit recommendation is to learn about > FreeBSD porting, create the port, submit it, and hope > that it gets accepted: > >   https://docs.freebsd.org/en/books/porters-handbook/book/ > > There's a big learning curve, but on the plus side, > once you've created your first port, it should be much > easier the next time. :-) > > cheers, > raf From nobody Sun Aug 29 06:44:32 2021 X-Original-To: ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B574179D9E2 for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2021 06:45:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.e.sanliturk@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vs1-xe35.google.com (mail-vs1-xe35.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::e35]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Gy3qH2ljgz4fVX for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2021 06:45:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.e.sanliturk@gmail.com) Received: by mail-vs1-xe35.google.com with SMTP id i23so8001029vsj.4 for ; Sat, 28 Aug 2021 23:45:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=7qHpcFNLNl9PxOy42yToAPNBE3Tgab+7FKEQTlpsnc0=; b=B+QZu/hRYOWLwSi6KJ3C/QNgs1kKCyLNh2654y2VNQvi+gxKETuvfzF4twsYoYKRf/ MG9NYZ/GLcjPptPe5CpyGtF5XN0/Hj/AmEpa86z3lYq1ltQFbSYD/bFWLGHJ5fSZb97+ 7aHg8o438QN2HradQzoeboOuajes2XnCSe3ar5JkqsGwYPKIhpk+3hcwmOPe1dABHfnG +WjzVJBMEpIUyrrMPRqZ1ELRMl02BfRBTOcVztbvQjw3WXNOsKqk9sjvyUas9aBLuksx Q0QmYd77UeX9H3AGLDGmKJzeuXXkIoX22z130jhofyaEho92YZpwxUHnmjxqMHVIShzm 0nQQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=7qHpcFNLNl9PxOy42yToAPNBE3Tgab+7FKEQTlpsnc0=; b=Va6uKZINx71SDO6lx3ZD8Gb1nmuSjHS8z+tnO2GqO3GCXEWS7nlOXaeVs67AyX5QXZ o1JnAQcmfYWM4euCgt28tBxQidA/+NQeeRfpCdhH3poL6umcmXpUYi2zkmpBQKeK6Q4y Tx0I+85Smw7ogFLRXmcW8W7CCGkyYAsNR60dCPalYOR6VJhEVDl18hB8T9lTrnE3Lc8y GazG19IDgGyQ7vbYV4tJkcxXVbas6o+nFVhsh+pHq+pTGSwcb664eNVDES4ka2CuUTNy adjir8+JMayXPGYZaJab0YeYa3VkbnQ6yKkrP9wEnNBpgA5RJI0gSbDS0ljH8ptjHtJL 7mzQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530c5i2CR/BB8kP1P+ilkGJEAIKNCmP2diJNqt1yL24NKGHYZAbI q0CRwOuixzlAvwsUm053d4sovEXDSmzsYWw7VEFesC+S X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxJyj7o7ueqqjSP4Zx00HB3ZZwCQWCcoMpBNUowsZ7BpqqXo59SQcEQpFPs4vP0z4tNXk0up+aoMpPLT1t4J+I= X-Received: by 2002:a67:f656:: with SMTP id u22mr2146546vso.11.1630219508934; Sat, 28 Aug 2021 23:45:08 -0700 (PDT) List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <5586012f9adea958e541191f7598eda1cfc5d8d6.camel@o0l0o.org> In-Reply-To: <5586012f9adea958e541191f7598eda1cfc5d8d6.camel@o0l0o.org> From: Mehmet Erol Sanliturk Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2021 23:44:32 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [REQUEST] Portfolio Performance To: masterone@o0l0o.org Cc: FreeBSD Ports Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000bc699a05caad0eb5" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Gy3qH2ljgz4fVX X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: Y --000000000000bc699a05caad0eb5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Sat, Aug 28, 2021 at 7:42 PM Master One via ports wrote: > Maybe I should have mentioned that I'm not a FreeBSD user yet, but just > checking out the possibility to replace Arch Linux on my laptop. > > I know about the Porters Handbook, but I'm not a developer or > programmer, so diving in that deep may not be an option for me (I > possibly would if I could, but then it may be a question of available > time to learn all that's necessary and actually do it). > > I thought maybe I can gain the interest of someone who is capable and > would find use of that software for himself. > > > On Sun, 2021-08-29 at 12:34 +1000, raf via ports wrote: > > On Sun, Aug 29, 2021 at 04:06:00AM +0200, Master One via freebsd- > > ports wrote: > > > > > Not an advert or SPAM, but indeed just a port request ;) > > > > > > Though not sure how this classifies as badly worded and how I > > > should > > > have written that request differently. > > > > > > > > > On Sat, 2021-08-28 at 15:41 -0700, Lee Brown wrote: > > > > It's meant to be a port request, i.e. will somebody please port > > > > this > > > > to > > > > FreeBSD, but badly worded. > > > > > > > > I marked it as SPAM before I saw the forum post where SirDice > > > > pointed > > > > them > > > > to this ML. So no, not just you :) > > > > > > > > On Sat, Aug 28, 2021 at 2:46 PM Dave Horsfall > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Is it just me, or does this look suspiciously like an advert? > > > > > > > > > > -- Dave > > > > I think it makes sense that a request for a new port > > explain why the software is worth porting. I can also > > imagine that it might be difficult to do this in a way > > that doesn't sound like an advertisement for the > > software. After all, the request is an attempt to > > entice an existing porter to take on additional work. > > That's inherently an attempt at persuasion. > > > > The porting documentation I've seen only covers > > creating a new port, not asking someone else to do so, > > or giving advice on how best to do that. > > > > I suppose the implicit recommendation is to learn about > > FreeBSD porting, create the port, submit it, and hope > > that it gets accepted: > > > > https://docs.freebsd.org/en/books/porters-handbook/book/ > > > > There's a big learning curve, but on the plus side, > > once you've created your first port, it should be much > > easier the next time. :-) > > > > cheers, > > raf > > > Many years ago , I have sent a ( or many ) message(s) to some lists by suggesting the following idea(s) separately or combined ( I do not remember now correctly ) by saying ( approximately ) : The Handbook is outside of the source tree and maintained as a SINGLE ( let's say ) file , for THREE releases . Rules or explanations are separated by IF statements related to respective covered releases . When a new release is issued , ALL of the respective IF statements need to be modified respectively . I have been in the computing area since 1970 . To maintain such a handbook structure over sliding releases correctly is an ENORMOUS task , means it is NOT POSSIBLE . Then please move Handbook into related source tree and maintain it separately for each release . In the FreeBSD web site , display handbooks and man pages with respect to releases . Additionally , display the handbook and man pages like a blog system , each part as a new page . Link mailing lists subjects with these pages . When a user writes a comment into a man or handbook page , send it to the mailing list . In that way , threads will be attached to the related man page or handbook page . In messages , there is very valuable information , but these points are lost in the current mailing list structure . If messages are linked into respective pages , parts may be transmitted into the respective pages and these improve it considerably . In that way , related useful information is not lost and it will be used in later accesses . I am able to understand that dear FreeBSD maintainers are doing very good jobs , but these are not sufficient to supply the most efficient service . The expectation is that "The best thing is to supply such a service yourself ." . A very good suggestion . But there is an important problem : It is sometimes possible to generate a GOOD idea , but its implementation is impossible for the idea generator to supply such a service due to LACK of such knowledge . A possible solution would be to supply such a solution by persons being experts on such blog systems . Missing part is this HELP structure . Mehmet Erol Sanliturk --000000000000bc699a05caad0eb5-- From nobody Sun Aug 29 14:45:10 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6017F17B5A42 for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2021 14:45:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david@catwhisker.org) Received: from mx.catwhisker.org (mx.catwhisker.org [107.204.234.170]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4GyGT41C5gz4grp; Sun, 29 Aug 2021 14:45:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david@catwhisker.org) Received: from albert.catwhisker.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by albert.catwhisker.org (8.16.1/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 17TEjANF097338; Sun, 29 Aug 2021 14:45:10 GMT (envelope-from david@albert.catwhisker.org) Received: (from david@localhost) by albert.catwhisker.org (8.16.1/8.16.1/Submit) id 17TEjA9P097337; Sun, 29 Aug 2021 07:45:10 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from david) Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2021 07:45:10 -0700 From: David Wolfskill To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: x11/nvidia-driver update to 470.63.01 seems to break GK106GLM [Quadro K2100M] Message-ID: Reply-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ay/MgEHb6wX/Vdui" Content-Disposition: inline X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4GyGT41C5gz4grp X-Spamd-Bar: + Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of david@catwhisker.org designates 107.204.234.170 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=david@catwhisker.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [1.60 / 15.00]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(1.00)[0.999]; FREEFALL_USER(0.00)[david]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:107.204.234.170]; MIME_GOOD(-0.20)[multipart/signed,text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[catwhisker.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROMTLD(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; SIGNED_PGP(-2.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7018, ipnet:107.192.0.0/12, country:US]; REPLYTO_EQ_TO_ADDR(5.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-Spam: Yes X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N --ay/MgEHb6wX/Vdui Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable A few days ago, I returned home from a couple of weeks away (during which I did not do my usual daily updates to FreeBSD & installed ports). Yesterday, when I updated my main laptop's stable/12 environment, I found that the machine did not initialize X11 (I use xdm) as expected; rather, the screen went blank, and I saw a crash dump (information on which is in https://www.catwhisker.org/~david/FreeBSD/stable_12/n233672-a436245ccf1/). A newer laptop (which I have ... slowly ... been trying to get into suitable working order) did not exhibit the above symptoms upon performing the same update. After noticing that the older/failing laptop had: g1-55(12.2-S)[1] pciconf -lv | grep -B 2 Quadro vgapci0@pci0:1:0:0: class=3D0x030000 card=3D0x05cc1028 chip=3D0x11fc10d= e rev=3D0xa1 hdr=3D0x00 vendor =3D 'NVIDIA Corporation' device =3D 'GK106GLM [Quadro K2100M]' while the newer one had: g1-48(12.2-S)[8] pciconf -lv | grep -B 2 Quadro vgapci0@pci0:1:0:0: class=3D0x030000 card=3D0x17b01028 chip=3D0x13b610d= e rev=3D0xa2 hdr=3D0x00 vendor =3D 'NVIDIA Corporation' device =3D 'GM107GLM [Quadro M1200 Mobile]' And that x11/nvidia-driver had (during the time I was away) been updated: commit 1a86bea35222459cae676d18682b85e919f50512 Author: Kevin Bowling Date: Sun Aug 15 11:44:34 2021 -0700 graphics: Make libglvnd a LIB_DEPEND =20 There are still some incoming reports of dep issues when upgrading old systems. This should help with dep solving and getting past the file conflicts. =20 Reviewed by: jbeich, x11 (manu) Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D31465 commit 77a2452a895b80a7136d1453ce4ad5fe00b58773 Author: Kevin Bowling Date: Tue Aug 10 19:47:16 2021 -0700 x11/{linux-nvidia-libs,nvidia-driver}: Update to 470.63.01 =20 This is the new stable branch and adds support for Vulkan. =20 See https://www.nvidia.com/Download/driverResults.aspx/177146/en-us and https://www.nvidia.com/download/driverResults.aspx/179601/en-us for additional changes. =20 PR: 257456 Approved by: danfe I tried removing x11/nvidia-driver and installing x11/nvidia-driver-390 instead ... et voil=E0: working X11 again. I don't know if this is expected, but figured that some others might at least be interested, so I'm sharing. :-} I'm happy to try to help diagnose and/or test, as time & other resources permit. Peace, david --=20 David H. Wolfskill david@catwhisker.org Life is not intended to be a zero-sum game. See https://www.catwhisker.org/~david/publickey.gpg for my public key. --ay/MgEHb6wX/Vdui Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQGTBAEBCgB9FiEE4owz2QxMJyaxAefyQLJg+bY2PckFAmErnXZfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldEUy OEMzM0Q5MEM0QzI3MjZCMTAxRTdGMjQwQjI2MEY5QjYzNjNEQzkACgkQQLJg+bY2 PclcQQgAmLewxBGcRjfQPybCZhU50eiwrrmRQVdJ72eeXdzqBKjNX5LtGTFiRiqj kka2IK7VXu6fsNC7JMM5htL6PND42ZQbPlRvYQArakMgkz6XjNXv37HWsU6YvXjU OCSkxlTW6Fve3yBTpMfymueYO5/qw//FDX6yCaqoo8ld0ANlXju6PhfdjtZSdwg0 8T8epVuG7IJer+WQwxdCpYGTLDAgma+p7NIEDN5ok3kIrO64k0XdAKHbmuNnY6ef qUYHpNXdDYSG7ec16j4BN9ux6UMa8e4HLR2bmXrFkjE8bHke4gB5UJuyAnHTNS91 bYLzez42ud3i+OoOTgGdZXdnXe1j2Q== =vc70 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ay/MgEHb6wX/Vdui-- From nobody Sun Aug 29 20:32:19 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE49E17894B4 for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2021 20:32:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kevin.bowling@kev009.com) Received: from mail-yb1-xb34.google.com (mail-yb1-xb34.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b34]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4GyQ9q4yW2z3rtx for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2021 20:32:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kevin.bowling@kev009.com) Received: by mail-yb1-xb34.google.com with SMTP id a93so24135671ybi.1 for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2021 13:32:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kev009.com; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=LL1cE/Zi8GWRS8pxyhu65k6ggjfY62YJ0y0VJo4cFWw=; b=ONgIP184Wc4M30ZipOnpGm+4pAttZMbM0gl3cTwurOiQh1OkHiZNVOzZaG55Jf0757 IFqC/bOxVLhoi1zUm9tte1s0lP7cXdAhF4pH5KpF+VPgX+0irjrVOhzp/VQcVrw8Xzz1 Wcn9SrHpTFWJB8PS0f2ytUfWgV65MA2Fo10Og= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=LL1cE/Zi8GWRS8pxyhu65k6ggjfY62YJ0y0VJo4cFWw=; b=qogzbeBb9ttL+bsXH7MEtRJzLLbMCBfCgFYjdKQ7vB0M7T7Ydh86oAiFOIoWeJxPrT JHuM3lUVZyLqsVp1U/sALC0Zlk2hQ4J17cRf+VtCobQgTTPKDCnycKjYTAeykwpya4LP 9M0XUyKTZLXGQGL4MsqV8jcTqOxxFKOr1JoHu6n24KMLs+mUXN5EaJAwKAEbPudJX+SG zB1Yi31xpXs0Fi5L5aC6jt448xcv4iQccvkwKFbEupNDMGClh2KsdCYPDy4n/N6liIOJ Y6+HgW0PycENzLWk3P/nEUm2SawqBOlt7aE20LZRkPo3/WzmkmDSO1UNyLK7EqW7FJfD PtKg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532IxNumNLpPZEPmg4wVvFYEOB6fNsGe0GO5DQ0OoDF8wn4s/IcG CC4oVnfVmryj70I4lhoNUsAC89l1sQJTaSbbbIbeuXju5N2LXu94 X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw9kfgOJxnQUgPBPpZA3IQzUEuSWX7fqG29Cxsq5Ag2YC+yCb8n4bwvHAxEQDlgOb0OlzWm/VYYlQ0RXaXO/fA= X-Received: by 2002:a25:9786:: with SMTP id i6mr18071416ybo.87.1630269151087; Sun, 29 Aug 2021 13:32:31 -0700 (PDT) List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Kevin Bowling Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2021 13:32:19 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: x11/nvidia-driver update to 470.63.01 seems to break GK106GLM [Quadro K2100M] To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4GyQ9q4yW2z3rtx X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N See if it is reproducible with a 13 or main kernel, there is a locking chan= ge which may interact differently on the different branches so that would be a good thing to know. This may need nvidia help since the error seems to be deeper in the blob, they have a support forum where you can link your report to start that. On Sun, Aug 29, 2021 at 7:45 AM David Wolfskill wrot= e: > > A few days ago, I returned home from a couple of weeks away (during > which I did not do my usual daily updates to FreeBSD & installed ports). > > Yesterday, when I updated my main laptop's stable/12 environment, I > found that the machine did not initialize X11 (I use xdm) as expected; > rather, the screen went blank, and I saw a crash dump (information on > which is in > https://www.catwhisker.org/~david/FreeBSD/stable_12/n233672-a436245ccf1/)= . > > A newer laptop (which I have ... slowly ... been trying to get into > suitable working order) did not exhibit the above symptoms upon > performing the same update. > > After noticing that the older/failing laptop had: > g1-55(12.2-S)[1] pciconf -lv | grep -B 2 Quadro > vgapci0@pci0:1:0:0: class=3D0x030000 card=3D0x05cc1028 chip=3D0x11fc1= 0de rev=3D0xa1 hdr=3D0x00 > vendor =3D 'NVIDIA Corporation' > device =3D 'GK106GLM [Quadro K2100M]' > > > while the newer one had: > g1-48(12.2-S)[8] pciconf -lv | grep -B 2 Quadro > vgapci0@pci0:1:0:0: class=3D0x030000 card=3D0x17b01028 chip=3D0x13b61= 0de rev=3D0xa2 hdr=3D0x00 > vendor =3D 'NVIDIA Corporation' > device =3D 'GM107GLM [Quadro M1200 Mobile]' > > And that x11/nvidia-driver had (during the time I was away) been updated: > > commit 1a86bea35222459cae676d18682b85e919f50512 > Author: Kevin Bowling > Date: Sun Aug 15 11:44:34 2021 -0700 > > graphics: Make libglvnd a LIB_DEPEND > > There are still some incoming reports of dep issues when upgrading > old systems. This should help with dep solving and getting past the > file conflicts. > > Reviewed by: jbeich, x11 (manu) > Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D31465 > > commit 77a2452a895b80a7136d1453ce4ad5fe00b58773 > Author: Kevin Bowling > Date: Tue Aug 10 19:47:16 2021 -0700 > > x11/{linux-nvidia-libs,nvidia-driver}: Update to 470.63.01 > > This is the new stable branch and adds support for Vulkan. > > See https://www.nvidia.com/Download/driverResults.aspx/177146/en-us > and https://www.nvidia.com/download/driverResults.aspx/179601/en-us > for additional changes. > > PR: 257456 > Approved by: danfe > > > I tried removing x11/nvidia-driver and installing x11/nvidia-driver-390 > instead ... et voil=C3=A0: working X11 again. > > I don't know if this is expected, but figured that some others might > at least be interested, so I'm sharing. :-} > > I'm happy to try to help diagnose and/or test, as time & other > resources permit. > > Peace, > david > -- > David H. Wolfskill david@catwhisker.org > Life is not intended to be a zero-sum game. > > See https://www.catwhisker.org/~david/publickey.gpg for my public key. From nobody Sun Aug 29 20:36:30 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 449BE178C345 for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2021 20:36:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david@catwhisker.org) Received: from mx.catwhisker.org (mx.catwhisker.org [107.204.234.170]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4GyQGR518Fz3tpd for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2021 20:36:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david@catwhisker.org) Received: from albert.catwhisker.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by albert.catwhisker.org (8.16.1/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 17TKaUgu003041; Sun, 29 Aug 2021 20:36:30 GMT (envelope-from david@albert.catwhisker.org) Received: (from david@localhost) by albert.catwhisker.org (8.16.1/8.16.1/Submit) id 17TKaU1g003040; Sun, 29 Aug 2021 13:36:30 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from david) Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2021 13:36:30 -0700 From: David Wolfskill To: Kevin Bowling Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: x11/nvidia-driver update to 470.63.01 seems to break GK106GLM [Quadro K2100M] Message-ID: References: List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="l/dCY/Gre2Xqj590" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4GyQGR518Fz3tpd X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N --l/dCY/Gre2Xqj590 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Aug 29, 2021 at 01:32:19PM -0700, Kevin Bowling wrote: > See if it is reproducible with a 13 or main kernel, there is a locking ch= ange > which may interact differently on the different branches so that would > be a good thing to know. This may need nvidia help since the error > seems to be deeper in the blob, they have a support forum where you > can link your report to start that. I had encountered (very!) similar results on head@main-n248984-08b9cc316a31 (from yesterday), so I believe it is thus reproducible. I'm AFK for the next ~1.5 hours... > .... Thanks! Peace, david --=20 David H. Wolfskill david@catwhisker.org Life is not intended to be a zero-sum game. See https://www.catwhisker.org/~david/publickey.gpg for my public key. --l/dCY/Gre2Xqj590 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQGTBAEBCgB9FiEE4owz2QxMJyaxAefyQLJg+bY2PckFAmEr785fFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldEUy OEMzM0Q5MEM0QzI3MjZCMTAxRTdGMjQwQjI2MEY5QjYzNjNEQzkACgkQQLJg+bY2 PclSPggAlG7ax87H8nj6K4FsOEwr8rnRAEPlm4ALbbPG4ctdyk/pTlMiCc7sbmGp mlPF/YpROfcE+6aZNKc0i9YVmkb0M1IyjEDajDVQAixuWqbdos/9GBPgYG/6qYH2 BC0xE640TwR9TlpZv8aUiJxBASUXulMF6bbu33Zhfai6MX6ZLUkEUip4brsmlmZv aR+Q6SZrx3w+id5jqkLk49Nny0NkbC4ZIdpjw/WxEyuzdUX4q6CM1aa3JFR1rdx1 Ja74K2AjeFnP72q+TNushxU+N9T3y24Ewcu1mwOtO3NMrEzFaNtfLMcOJoGSb2iR zcCHz+0hrw0Gv/WYqVIT8Yx/1M7nQg== =3IFe -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --l/dCY/Gre2Xqj590--