From nobody Mon Nov 8 08:03:04 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C62A184E93E for ; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 08:03:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@grem.de) Received: from mail.evolve.de (mail.evolve.de [213.239.217.29]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA512 client-signature ECDSA (P-384) client-digest SHA384) (Client CN "mail.evolve.de", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HnkBW4rXPz3wSl; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 08:03:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@grem.de) Received: by mail.evolve.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 3c5cd4eb; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 08:03:10 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=grem.de; h=content-type :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to :date:cc:message-id:references:to; s=20180501; bh=An4HioBsaWciK0 GEKQ64t64fgug=; b=rF/8o6MdkrLgWJtmx45qK3P5JHFhtVEUV6oSb1CI0Vazg/ rf2reZq+uFSwiApmpGuIkt2SKuQlEs5hSqLqOnfZXGRLT9PNSJajOKGq1HdfXMeY 4HKcUQljwx9yMkWfBpNPC/EUX70RbG+zx9EFa8D3PORewh0nRhB6tSKyWVWqceLv 40XMgS35/cBBebgzzR5Cy5isREo2fw0eFjykQ2uizhBnrNu5SYa1BelKYrWwTetf qCG/1uXBw6UwIeOwnw6U3uHzAtjXV2nggjZV+n5EKXDSdhTGNdIN4Jem6olzva42 9avSSNfyKHhNzDlrsQX3MG+7vaIvKD0SEadxEm/Q== DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=grem.de; h=content-type :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to :date:cc:message-id:references:to; q=dns; s=20180501; b=Tj+zfPRY Bnl6ia+BSc9rmVVinzLCRqHnsZ+XLGbpHAM2+zCBtMrsoADl9LReQ67BG2RY7dj3 bHLkRUVgAoMOI+Lgz843QqtW7gtRctS6CmUaz5BtfdMyWqJWnM2VqvcbzL/ODCug MLz2klPJ+lNN53YaxPmJV6a7i5ARtqUAOZRgOMDPj/EtMtwZ89bEVOCtIWW11aNX UpgXfbtDhoY9+h5EPAORWgHxftoajD4M4/yTJj8hB5pZgwt740Q77P30iwuhmOhE 0HTD/0QLkKkDj/C//QZlM0anmSA5bx3Wnbe0NnR+rsTg36rCBsiJ0+6IfHHOROnA MA+VI594GlEHnw== Received: by mail.evolve.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 15fcf1d6 (TLSv1.3:AEAD-CHACHA20-POLY1305-SHA256:256:NO); Mon, 8 Nov 2021 08:03:05 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Subject: Re: Regarding port(s) you maintain in FreeBSD ports collection From: Michael Gmelin In-Reply-To: <5f2e07094306d7ae8dc1c98e95ee2d24@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2021 09:03:04 +0100 Cc: Greg 'groggy' Lehey , "Dan Mahoney (Ports)" , Freebsd Ports Message-Id: References: <5f2e07094306d7ae8dc1c98e95ee2d24@FreeBSD.org> To: Daniel Engberg X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (18F72) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4HnkBW4rXPz3wSl X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-Spam: Yes X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N > On 8. Nov 2021, at 00:46, Daniel Engberg wrote: >=20 > Hi, >=20 > I apologize for the confusion, I tried to catch "everyone" and I've (b)cc > all maintainers that do no have a Phabricator account but since a lot of > ports are old and unassigned to I figured that I should also notify > ports@ too to avoid people missing it. Which I like, as there is always a chance that there=E2=80=99s a port one re= lies on they might want to adopt and overhaul to prevent removal. It was sim= ply the wording that caused some confusing :) Cheers & thanks for your work, Michael From nobody Mon Nov 8 13:39:01 2021 X-Original-To: ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3335184F18D for ; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 13:39:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from otis@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [96.47.72.83]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Hnsf348kLz3tjF; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 13:39:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from otis@FreeBSD.org) Received: from ns2.wilbury.net (ns2.wilbury.net [IPv6:2a01:b200:0:1:f816:3eff:fecd:13e6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "svc.wilbury.net", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) (Authenticated sender: otis) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5128EA029; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 13:39:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from otis@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtpclient.apple (gw-upc.owhome.net [188.167.168.254]) (Authenticated sender: juraj@lutter.sk) by svc.wilbury.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9438445CF24; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 14:39:02 +0100 (CET) From: Juraj Lutter Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.120.0.1.13\)) Subject: cyrus-sasl dependency in bsd.ldap.mk Message-Id: <6F18C72A-D3FF-4135-9E7B-24D423F8489F@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2021 14:39:01 +0100 Cc: "" To: "delphij@freebsd.org" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.120.0.1.13) X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N Hi Delphij, you seem to be the most active in bsd.ldap.mk :-) I=E2=80=99ve found that since openldap-client also depends on cyrus-sasl = unconditionally, bsd.ldap.mk requires this: otis@b13:/usr/ports/Mk % git diff -- bsd.ldap.mk diff --git a/Mk/bsd.ldap.mk b/Mk/bsd.ldap.mk index a6f37dd99b10..7acbc9c660bb 100644 --- a/Mk/bsd.ldap.mk +++ b/Mk/bsd.ldap.mk @@ -77,6 +77,7 @@ IGNORE=3D cannot install: doesn't work = with OpenLDAP version: ${OPENLDAP_VER} (Do . endfor .endif # IGNORE_WITH_OPENLDAP LIB_DEPENDS+=3D = ${OPENLDAP${OPENLDAP_VER}_LIB}:net/openldap${OPENLDAP_VER}-client +LIB_DEPENDS+=3D libsasl2.so:security/cyrus-sasl2 .else IGNORE=3D cannot install: unknown OpenLDAP version: = ${OPENLDAP_VER} .endif # Check for correct libs What are you thought about it? Thanks otis =E2=80=94 Juraj Lutter otis@FreeBSD.org From nobody Mon Nov 8 16:51:42 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88E2D1842BB6 for ; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 16:52:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xxjack12xx@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ed1-x52f.google.com (mail-ed1-x52f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::52f]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1D4" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Hnxwd3Bs5z4XTP for ; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 16:52:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xxjack12xx@gmail.com) Received: by mail-ed1-x52f.google.com with SMTP id r12so64930562edt.6 for ; Mon, 08 Nov 2021 08:52:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=rVjBr6CM460LdFaVIP6YkTSe04OY4eicRzyPAvTZnvM=; b=a7ghkS24PWF27X1XUWKFONbFVifu8hu4PR9eqbkBkAp1YpmPPzBDv1zuOFyDvR4XIm sLocRkzX6OeK+6pIk8t1rc8cJnpnDhCLJsHbTNVOi8D0o/5Gj8o9cF1BL0T2Aw+JpAeI zd1LmCdIk7ABMPaWl5e+Clk4u375e9Q+8M8kfoqfJX/wU7A3bdlIQnrI5ruRDkm8/fdv 8U7AgqXsd+Io8SvFTrVnhDTkPuTSSgBQYQUjEumGGXfhyrZcEe/Qr6TmFHasTbrlSxF5 IzaGRlyRsANeuByzbYDrurf+ZVSiXaV1V+qQM3GVdm1K6qNzpnN+M9eJ583HCzJN1JGo OC7Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=rVjBr6CM460LdFaVIP6YkTSe04OY4eicRzyPAvTZnvM=; b=UWNzTg8TAK2xkbgP8TBqFX/6+Po8+Hc2e6IDd9TTvLNoIlL1mboFdqoJQME74hW2KZ VeVu3L6NyRPX4hqTDHKuOdNnbzd+ESAhw8IQBJrxJA2S9t4AjmZVIbaUSKGDUMlZRz6q OSHDyOFnSaYiMhvFpjXQpMS7wU8sSZjxbOOGGNZ4U61WC6cIwQN3ElwMv8TlwsKxLj/W N3q3cUF+Oelm7PMmGx2xT8srcZ6sIwEd6Ghy8pEYV6Pe6pXO4iZQSDSuInQ/o+NH1e9E CbMFbA0RzLC3YaO+BiBfR4CklqAt0zKWk/Tzbr4XrPDqoQoJHLm7e403a/2Az+M8BSDC ljyw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5316QQpTeSOm4QIEg8QnTeN+qoTYCNbybn2SfUPp0y692WZ7KiEC U0RdrswwdkiZV1OWWHISgr/BPcpGGzsI/cLa1XQEIfUnvMc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyE7V1/pB1Pmv4xWO9/5a1G/OiHSNsxQdZwE/xv6JRCOP3DpTKXAAL4t6L4dPcQX7asFpCgG9As01QUKA8cv14= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:af1a:: with SMTP id lx26mr866601ejb.44.1636390310572; Mon, 08 Nov 2021 08:51:50 -0800 (PST) List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 From: "Jack L." Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2021 08:51:42 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: audacity port needing updating To: FBSD Ports Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Hnxwd3Bs5z4XTP X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=a7ghkS24; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of xxjack12xx@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4864:20::52f as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=xxjack12xx@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.00 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20210112]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.99)[-0.993]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(1.00)[0.996]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROMTLD(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2a00:1450:4864:20::52f:from]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(1.00)[1.000]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a00:1450:4000::/36]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2a00:1450::/32, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com:dkim] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N Hi, can someone help me take a look at the audacity port and possibly commit it? https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=259565 I've been constantly running into a situation where the commit to the port is taking so long that the next version comes out before the port is committed and then ending up needing to create another patch against a long outdated port version, etc. Is there any way the process can be sped up being the maintainer of the port? The audacity release cycle appears to have a new release in less than a month but recently the port doesn't get committed for over a month or 2 months until I email the ports list to get someone's attention. From nobody Mon Nov 8 17:17:55 2021 X-Original-To: ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C0DE184F30D for ; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 17:18:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from delphij@delphij.net) Received: from anubis.delphij.net (anubis.delphij.net [IPv6:2001:470:1:117::25]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "anubis.delphij.net", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HnyVg0f5Dz4h0N; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 17:18:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from delphij@delphij.net) Received: from odin.corp.delphij.net (unknown [IPv6:2601:646:8600:1e3a:24a4:3280:634c:578]) by anubis.delphij.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 28D9E579D1; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 09:17:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=delphij.net; s=m7e2; t=1636391876; x=1636406276; bh=kBUnQ+sSkbQyLmW28/6+5W2Au6dw4ekRuf1/cb123oE=; h=Date:To:Cc:References:From:Reply-To:Subject:In-Reply-To; b=UZk9IwB1d6ak7EmJHgW5PR0FB0Rn0LRJ+Htv5IsHdVCs2c/nRYQb7E1q9Rctly9P1 h8EN9QpnnBBQeJbaJEmt3AjgyOn+Qqn59gIrr0NM/bOubxVjvpmFpyy2uAixyXxfXe UJNPP+wZo+RGNYewgXl++4J9/zawrTNOByyV1iLFoYSjCU2dzmmp8QbtMrTN+FrJ+E RRGpJlm064KCG33q/8NPIWMn/lTumgz0eId+LRdWn5evHgqp5Zq0tBOsTA8Ndw88hu Lu9NXPmQG2acH/NrFzQukBRpxLrMvFaKE2BKLRvcz5qp+jR4OZTx5f+9/mXBPwTfb1 9SqiE22DU9nzg== Message-ID: <11853a40-85dc-e562-8883-1f1d3a7a7d20@delphij.net> Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2021 09:17:55 -0800 List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Thunderbird Content-Language: en-US To: Juraj Lutter Cc: ports@freebsd.org References: <6F18C72A-D3FF-4135-9E7B-24D423F8489F@FreeBSD.org> Reply-To: d@delphij.net Subject: Re: cyrus-sasl dependency in bsd.ldap.mk In-Reply-To: <6F18C72A-D3FF-4135-9E7B-24D423F8489F@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------hB6GrH0JsdsXS00qPwsobwq6" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4HnyVg0f5Dz4h0N X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[] Reply-To: delphij@delphij.net From: Xin Li via ports X-Original-From: Xin Li X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --------------hB6GrH0JsdsXS00qPwsobwq6 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------Rzv2go8b3c27CBMEbevdUikI"; protected-headers="v1" From: Xin Li Reply-To: d@delphij.net To: Juraj Lutter Cc: ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <11853a40-85dc-e562-8883-1f1d3a7a7d20@delphij.net> Subject: Re: cyrus-sasl dependency in bsd.ldap.mk References: <6F18C72A-D3FF-4135-9E7B-24D423F8489F@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <6F18C72A-D3FF-4135-9E7B-24D423F8489F@FreeBSD.org> --------------Rzv2go8b3c27CBMEbevdUikI Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 T24gMTEvOC8yMSAwNTozOSwgSnVyYWogTHV0dGVyIHdyb3RlOg0KPiBIaSBEZWxwaGlqLA0K PiANCj4geW91IHNlZW0gdG8gYmUgdGhlIG1vc3QgYWN0aXZlIGluIGJzZC5sZGFwLm1rIDot KQ0KPiANCj4gSeKAmXZlIGZvdW5kIHRoYXQgc2luY2Ugb3BlbmxkYXAtY2xpZW50IGFsc28g ZGVwZW5kcyBvbiBjeXJ1cy1zYXNsIHVuY29uZGl0aW9uYWxseSwgYnNkLmxkYXAubWsgcmVx dWlyZXMgdGhpczoNCj4gDQo+IG90aXNAYjEzOi91c3IvcG9ydHMvTWsgJSBnaXQgZGlmZiAt LSBic2QubGRhcC5taw0KPiBkaWZmIC0tZ2l0IGEvTWsvYnNkLmxkYXAubWsgYi9Nay9ic2Qu bGRhcC5taw0KPiBpbmRleCBhNmYzN2RkOTliMTAuLjdhY2JjOWM2NjBiYiAxMDA2NDQNCj4g LS0tIGEvTWsvYnNkLmxkYXAubWsNCj4gKysrIGIvTWsvYnNkLmxkYXAubWsNCj4gQEAgLTc3 LDYgKzc3LDcgQEAgSUdOT1JFPSAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIGNhbm5vdCBpbnN0YWxsOiBkb2Vz bid0IHdvcmsgd2l0aCBPcGVuTERBUCB2ZXJzaW9uOiAke09QRU5MREFQX1ZFUn0gKERvDQo+ ICAgLiAgICAgIGVuZGZvcg0KPiAgIC5lbmRpZiAjIElHTk9SRV9XSVRIX09QRU5MREFQDQo+ ICAgTElCX0RFUEVORFMrPSAgJHtPUEVOTERBUCR7T1BFTkxEQVBfVkVSfV9MSUJ9Om5ldC9v cGVubGRhcCR7T1BFTkxEQVBfVkVSfS1jbGllbnQNCj4gK0xJQl9ERVBFTkRTKz0gIGxpYnNh c2wyLnNvOnNlY3VyaXR5L2N5cnVzLXNhc2wyDQo+ICAgLmVsc2UNCj4gICBJR05PUkU9ICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgIGNhbm5vdCBpbnN0YWxsOiB1bmtub3duIE9wZW5MREFQIHZlcnNpb246 ICR7T1BFTkxEQVBfVkVSfQ0KPiAgIC5lbmRpZiAjIENoZWNrIGZvciBjb3JyZWN0IGxpYnMN Cj4gDQo+IFdoYXQgYXJlIHlvdSB0aG91Z2h0IGFib3V0IGl0Pw0KDQpDb3VsZCB5b3UgcHJv dmlkZSBhbiBleGFtcGxlIHRoYXQgc2hvd3MgdGhlIGJyZWFrYWdlIG9yIGVsYWJvcmF0ZSBt b3JlIA0KYWJvdXQgd2h5IGxpYnNhc2wyLnNvIG5lZWRzIHRvIGJlIGxpc3RlZCBhcyBhIGRp cmVjdCBsaWJyYXJ5IGRlcGVuZGVuY3kgDQpmb3IgcG9ydHMgdGhhdCBkZXBlbmRzIG9uIE9w ZW5MREFQPyAgSXQncyBhbHJlYWR5IGxpc3RlZCBhcyBMSUJfREVQRU5EUyANCmluIG9wZW5s ZGFwKi17c2VydmVyLGNsaWVudH0gYW5kIGluc3RhbGxpbmcgdGhlIGxpYnJhcnkgc2hvdWxk IA0KYXV0b21hdGljYWxseSBicmluZyBpbiBjeXJ1cy1zYXNsIGFzIG5lZWRlZCwgbm8/DQoN CkNoZWVycywNCg== --------------Rzv2go8b3c27CBMEbevdUikI-- --------------hB6GrH0JsdsXS00qPwsobwq6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="OpenPGP_signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="OpenPGP_signature" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- wsF5BAABCAAjFiEEceNg5NEMZIki80nQQHl/fJX0g08FAmGJW8MFAwAAAAAACgkQQHl/fJX0g0/y 7g/+KVG51B9oF8DozWr310StazrvCKxRIIb8MtviuqG9OTM4mzsMOYs9DQEHZoOHUYZKORefnsHT qafuu6qu/QKqURhn7VP1bM3u3vfw3aA/Azpp2E58n5eB59VuDjEJccD4qYGx8U9eNG/TcPCIfRZ5 UzyRazPnDXEwrJkEOzdbKdB4GoQp7mPZLZPKxw5ZkR4wNQWSc8q5dBo0Y8TTXqiTR+BwQPS8C2wk sm5SuguM4DuAlgZoYnGTxgOdBUgPS+FJBuitLR6O/K/wPd+ekz/vAuqyfkB0HOVfiJtmiQytyhTL uv3XiecK44o0Dl1wVRPcqQ8k982mmtFrzdPJ8Qm/rx4lEhddfNXTRj1K5h2VVJ7xoVx7aT5E8clp 2Tvh1kY2PAwWTBkzBkz0eC7yl6WRfMVB4qm4mt2UY0iQTus46+c6IAe6YqDWz+8G+fKo+egcT42x TmebDXTq0NpOiBq/VyjVrieKvbVoEuzJ4rL7X6WmJGnGnafOQ+oU9s73xRqSuBNt8mwwvLY9rqNz bP9dM3e/HF36puDi2I5qGfChF3R64a/t72On9cT70kHP8x3NUpC5YtGbrqhL2mYREoLtR5OhchBZ Zc/MxCN46cg9PU73NbYsvcl5O+IiCjnEbJY0dV+dB/ygVqJ/t99URrjMnx5lcobubSjlw20gfaMS l0Q= =H3Z1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------hB6GrH0JsdsXS00qPwsobwq6-- From nobody Mon Nov 8 17:28:27 2021 X-Original-To: ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 744DC1837501 for ; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 17:28:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from otis@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [96.47.72.83]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Hnykk2ZB4z4lsx; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 17:28:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from otis@FreeBSD.org) Received: from ns2.wilbury.net (ns2.wilbury.net [92.60.51.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "svc.wilbury.net", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) (Authenticated sender: otis) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1B123BE1D; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 17:28:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from otis@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtpclient.apple (gw-upc.owhome.net [188.167.168.254]) (Authenticated sender: juraj@lutter.sk) by svc.wilbury.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 66EB145CF7D; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 18:28:28 +0100 (CET) From: Juraj Lutter Message-Id: Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_99BE8861-CF63-48B3-ACA2-14AEE8B5D149"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256 List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.120.0.1.13\)) Subject: Re: cyrus-sasl dependency in bsd.ldap.mk Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2021 18:28:27 +0100 In-Reply-To: <11853a40-85dc-e562-8883-1f1d3a7a7d20@delphij.net> Cc: ports@freebsd.org To: d@delphij.net References: <6F18C72A-D3FF-4135-9E7B-24D423F8489F@FreeBSD.org> <11853a40-85dc-e562-8883-1f1d3a7a7d20@delphij.net> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.120.0.1.13) X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N --Apple-Mail=_99BE8861-CF63-48B3-ACA2-14AEE8B5D149 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 > On 8 Nov 2021, at 18:17, Xin Li wrote: >=20 > On 11/8/21 05:39, Juraj Lutter wrote: >> Hi Delphij, >> you seem to be the most active in bsd.ldap.mk :-) >> I=E2=80=99ve found that since openldap-client also depends on = cyrus-sasl unconditionally, bsd.ldap.mk requires this: >> otis@b13:/usr/ports/Mk % git diff -- bsd.ldap.mk >> diff --git a/Mk/bsd.ldap.mk b/Mk/bsd.ldap.mk >> index a6f37dd99b10..7acbc9c660bb 100644 >> --- a/Mk/bsd.ldap.mk >> +++ b/Mk/bsd.ldap.mk >> @@ -77,6 +77,7 @@ IGNORE=3D cannot install: doesn't = work with OpenLDAP version: ${OPENLDAP_VER} (Do >> . endfor >> .endif # IGNORE_WITH_OPENLDAP >> LIB_DEPENDS+=3D = ${OPENLDAP${OPENLDAP_VER}_LIB}:net/openldap${OPENLDAP_VER}-client >> +LIB_DEPENDS+=3D libsasl2.so:security/cyrus-sasl2 >> .else >> IGNORE=3D cannot install: unknown OpenLDAP version: = ${OPENLDAP_VER} >> .endif # Check for correct libs >> What are you thought about it? >=20 > Could you provide an example that shows the breakage or elaborate more = about why libsasl2.so needs to be listed as a direct library dependency = for ports that depends on OpenLDAP? It's already listed as LIB_DEPENDS = in openldap*-{server,client} and installing the library should = automatically bring in cyrus-sasl as needed, no? In fact, I was only looking for a solution to silence this: =3D=3D=3D=3D> Running Q/A tests (stage-qa) Error: /usr/local/lib/postfix/postfix-ldap.so is linked to = /usr/local/lib/libsasl2.so.3 from security/cyrus-sasl2 but it is not = declared as a dependency Warning: you need LIB_DEPENDS+=3Dlibsasl2.so:security/cyrus-sasl2 And even when LDAP is being pulled in via LIB_DEPENDS in bsd.ldap.mk, = there is no explicit dependency on cyrus-sasl2. What would be the better approach? Given that bsd.ldap.mk is not the = right place. Thanks. =E2=80=94 Juraj Lutter otis@FreeBSD.org --Apple-Mail=_99BE8861-CF63-48B3-ACA2-14AEE8B5D149 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEAREIAB0WIQR9WLqI3W4V0bRHtaAtyIKFszIZVAUCYYleOwAKCRAtyIKFszIZ VBtDAQCp6+h/S4TPUQiN70CAO1ezoXTCRca6fkl4qfnQ4AzEKwD/cLW9hlq5xhE7 U8ZNVZaVajnBAI89AfyTyGOCmwtOrDk= =4s5r -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_99BE8861-CF63-48B3-ACA2-14AEE8B5D149-- From nobody Mon Nov 8 18:25:35 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DC49183DF93 for ; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 18:25:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jonc@chen.org.nz) Received: from mail-oi1-x22f.google.com (mail-oi1-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::22f]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1D4" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Hp00w1qxkz3Lg4 for ; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 18:25:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jonc@chen.org.nz) Received: by mail-oi1-x22f.google.com with SMTP id q124so29020701oig.3 for ; Mon, 08 Nov 2021 10:25:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chen-org-nz.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=I2CqXqRoO1Us/GG30SZEftbqSnq5I6dKmBjgLhvDk54=; b=kLNZLXvd5EjT5xIzvrKH4xtSlAu5X6jV6Qyz8K77NjhRz8HvYDXQjrnC1B1CEXsMWp SL0ii85x9fFMlvzeJfNnxy5AJaN1HVRV3tQ6D9YY8WOeqzY6JMyHGQPnYKw6LREo/S6N 1mYgKYnspO6QUfSKwNa/jJ9vkGB8hqcLP+rtcxBDBwTmmbjRaq1iR0FVp6wlUJTvVqp8 l+kalLCPEwNQt6TbZU9MygGPOEPvo2/IqbS47fqYg4Ik02Hq4CPAgW8ojw7acSw+Uc+G Mk2ODiQssggVTtItr+1jlPGQ2QRieJ1rqFI9NkqwSvXyHniopqoY6oZIXr2Ne3/AzcW3 C5cQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=I2CqXqRoO1Us/GG30SZEftbqSnq5I6dKmBjgLhvDk54=; b=Y/uh+G8SKlwwva9H4w9DNNIEu76H90hUSfPiMoVQIDJen1+W3M2eiRCKztPHEv97bW naEDQLFjVoPu9m4jZHySMzIVWRmwYQeygRG6g0iBlM0VAz7XelMM3+2+5At8h6E4k7sq sf9kzBYUwkz6MtlqpVpEV4txXcxmEQ7w7+BQg7wqNGpKgVgxpgKgYWDK1aXmOy/ghPzz jIvhojvJm4KI3H3ClI6l0XSl1Ifh6Qs8/D+8rGeIRi07e0iaTDpwQbWx2BEBxPct3G5o abdAnYsiSwFeSLOqeto7RIV2U9uLSPopHAWq5AcBsYXwYs7sT9hx5zAxpx+6pU12M0Z5 xuzQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5302uSSvX+a7EV8JVf1npZsVD1Hsjvar4o4XnscH6/EUYhwgtzsZ Y86nVt4KWmV1VloawP4nQ74T1a10PZAakT6I3iZ+/UuyV6AEJg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyxLkcov8TGvZHpsy6oWpzozg9ZfLjRppsO0AQcINlAExpq1n0MIJ+VpmejsAbxcoI/TKsiFgQAOAl/38YK/tY= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:13ca:: with SMTP id d10mr295699oiw.154.1636395951458; Mon, 08 Nov 2021 10:25:51 -0800 (PST) List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Jonathan Chen Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2021 07:25:35 +1300 Message-ID: Subject: Port Commit Request textproc/sigil To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Hp00w1qxkz3Lg4 X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=chen-org-nz.20210112.gappssmtp.com header.s=20210112 header.b=kLNZLXvd; dmarc=none; spf=softfail (mx1.freebsd.org: 2607:f8b0:4864:20::22f is neither permitted nor denied by domain of jonc@chen.org.nz) smtp.mailfrom=jonc@chen.org.nz X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.70 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[chen-org-nz.20210112.gappssmtp.com:s=20210112]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; R_SPF_SOFTFAIL(0.00)[~all]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(1.00)[1.000]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[chen.org.nz]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[chen-org-nz.20210112.gappssmtp.com:+]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(1.00)[1.000]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::22f:from]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N Hi, Can a committer please review and commit: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=259444 Cheers. -- Jonathan Chen From nobody Mon Nov 8 18:38:14 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B1001845E98 for ; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 18:38:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brooks@spindle.one-eyed-alien.net) Received: from spindle.one-eyed-alien.net (spindle.one-eyed-alien.net [199.48.129.229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Hp0HK4Pw0z3QxD; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 18:38:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brooks@spindle.one-eyed-alien.net) Received: by spindle.one-eyed-alien.net (Postfix, from userid 3001) id DBE5A3C0199; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 18:38:14 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2021 18:38:14 +0000 From: Brooks Davis To: Dimitry Andric Cc: Stephen Montgomery-Smith , FreeBSD Ports Subject: Re: Running out of RAM building devel/llvm13 Message-ID: <20211108183814.GD81740@spindle.one-eyed-alien.net> References: <23a70169-d986-02c0-6763-61db22c75c0b@FreeBSD.org> <7D697030-8E5F-4B4F-B5E8-A8BE609A1CCA@FreeBSD.org> List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="dTy3Mrz/UPE2dbVg" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7D697030-8E5F-4B4F-B5E8-A8BE609A1CCA@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Hp0HK4Pw0z3QxD X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of brooks@spindle.one-eyed-alien.net has no SPF policy when checking 199.48.129.229) smtp.mailfrom=brooks@spindle.one-eyed-alien.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.41 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; FREEFALL_USER(0.00)[brooks]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.51)[-0.513]; MIME_GOOD(-0.20)[multipart/signed,text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[freebsd.org]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; SIGNED_PGP(-2.00)[]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[brooks@freebsd.org,brooks@spindle.one-eyed-alien.net]; RCVD_COUNT_ZERO(0.00)[0]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; FREEMAIL_CC(0.00)[gmail.com,FreeBSD.org]; ASN(0.00)[asn:36236, ipnet:199.48.128.0/22, country:US]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[brooks@freebsd.org,brooks@spindle.one-eyed-alien.net] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N --dTy3Mrz/UPE2dbVg Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Nov 07, 2021 at 12:38:20AM +0100, Dimitry Andric wrote: > On 6 Nov 2021, at 23:53, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: > >=20 > > Does anyone else have the problem of running out of RAM when building d= evel/llvm13? I have 6 CPUS, 4G of RAM, and 4G of swap. > >=20 > > I can solve it by building with MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE=3Dyes, but then the bu= ild is so slow. > >=20 > > It seems that there is a small part of the build which requires a lot o= f RAM, and it would be nice to restrict just that portion of the build to j= ust one CPU. >=20 > Try turning off the FLANG option. In my release testing for llvm 13.0.0 I= found this eats up most of the memory during a build. If you turn of FLANG, I also recommend disabling MLIR. It's nominally a separate thing with other uses, but I believe only flang uses it in tree. If we could isolate which file(s) use too much memory it might be possible for upstream to put in an exception to single-thread around them. BTW, which architecture are you building for? -- Brooks --dTy3Mrz/UPE2dbVg Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJhiW6WAAoJEKzQXbSebgfAGMwH+QG3tJN4NMW+RKoceIpzuCSy 3UrV+qoXCuY9EcSjUGA1NRIb1NW7XJH8yHg2JJrXK1UGltjmNUdtihZqABoJKMJV KRoRudnY/4aQkePKh0gH0MFNkh23xvng9Fa0HaVRAL1/cjhBZAgYGLjwxrTZ/bIY 43f6zzqWaVSwBQjKuHy3QlP1CswtOsCv6pAtJKP+epETrRQbsOyIvtOqp9jYMPqo kHxo4gZUY0IovnifCy/f2CVSm0ttF4Y5hxbj+N2p5RTcAJKLsw2P7YLz3T+tb7Y2 ulo2S6GTGXgbWm/Cfa+KUywTBHRaKnRrJ7XFFliXo1/SWGd4DJ8hFQj9xYizQ6Y= =tojc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --dTy3Mrz/UPE2dbVg-- From nobody Mon Nov 8 19:11:43 2021 X-Original-To: ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F6081858489 for ; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 19:11:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from contact@shiori.com.br) Received: from out0.migadu.com (out0.migadu.com [94.23.1.103]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Hp1244VtDz3v9g for ; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 19:11:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from contact@shiori.com.br) X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=shiori.com.br; s=key1; t=1636398707; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type; bh=++gbIW5xW95PajqnzA3PQNi91h+W1RZyFsB+Bcc7ZX8=; b=01zCDkiFLJ19RQ5Z5R8MW+6Os6JjytTDxMEGsZt7UxhVuhcKPadkdELIjKSdc26uShx0zf u+pYlq6Ewop9r7mQNCI/wAjTDEcMCt2dNHif0BeZb3M1M2628SQSi90vvQ+RA/HyLWU5eq 8iaFkWKc7kxR2KdAfRoQKUFPJTCGQnM= To: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: FreeBSD Port: devel/leiningen update to 2.9.7 Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2021 19:11:43 +0000 Message-ID: <86ilx2fonk.fsf@misaka.lan0> List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT X-Migadu-Auth-User: contact@shiori.com.br X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Hp1244VtDz3v9g X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=shiori.com.br header.s=key1 header.b=01zCDkiF; dmarc=pass (policy=quarantine) header.from=shiori.com.br; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of contact@shiori.com.br designates 94.23.1.103 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=contact@shiori.com.br X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.70 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[shiori.com.br:s=key1]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[94.23.1.103:from]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:94.23.1.103:c]; R_MISSING_CHARSET(2.50)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.20)[multipart/signed,text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[shiori.com.br:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[shiori.com.br,quarantine]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(1.00)[1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; SIGNED_PGP(-2.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_ZERO(0.00)[0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; ASN(0.00)[asn:16276, ipnet:94.23.0.0/16, country:FR]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[94.23.1.103:from] Reply-To: contact@shiori.com.br From: Filipe da Silva Santos via ports X-Original-From: Filipe da Silva Santos X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Bump to Clojure 1.10.3 (in ports) and fix bugs =2D-- /usr/local/poudriere/ports/default/devel/leiningen/Makefile 2021-11-0= 2 03:11:12.752512000 +0000 +++ Makefile 2021-11-08 03:09:52.873181000 +0000 @@ -1,8 +1,8 @@ PORTNAME=3D leiningen =2DPORTVERSION=3D 2.9.6 +PORTVERSION=3D 2.9.7 CATEGORIES=3D devel lisp java MASTER_SITES=3D https://github.com/technomancy/leiningen/releases/download= /${PORTVERSION}/:standalone =2DDISTFILES=3D leiningen-${PORTVERSION}-standalone.zip:standalone +DISTFILES=3D ${PORTNAME}-${PORTVERSION}-standalone.jar:standalone EXTRACT_ONLY=3D ${DISTNAME}${EXTRACT_SUFX} =20 MAINTAINER=3D ports@FreeBSD.org @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ etc/bash_completion.d/_lein.bash \ share/man/man1/lein.1.gz \ share/zsh/site-functions/_lein =2DPORTDATA=3D leiningen-${PORTVERSION}-standalone.zip +PORTDATA=3D leiningen-${PORTVERSION}-standalone.jar =20 post-patch: @${REINPLACE_CMD} -E -e 's|function (.*) \{|\1() {|' \ @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ -e 's|/etc/leinrc|${PREFIX}/etc/leinrc|' \ -e 's|\.leinrc|./&|' -e 's|source "|. "|' \ -e 's|^if \[\[ (.*) \]\];|if [ \1 ];|' \ =2D -e 's|^LEIN_JAR=3D.*|LEIN_JAR=3D${DATADIR}/leiningen-${PORTVERSION}-st= andalone.zip|' \ + -e 's|^LEIN_JAR=3D.*|LEIN_JAR=3D${DATADIR}/leiningen-${PORTVERSION}-stan= dalone.jar|' \ ${WRKSRC}/bin/lein-pkg =20 do-install: @@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ ${INSTALL_MAN} ${WRKSRC}/doc/lein.1 \ ${STAGEDIR}${PREFIX}/share/man/man1 @${MKDIR} ${STAGEDIR}${DATADIR} =2D ${INSTALL_DATA} ${DISTDIR}/leiningen-${PORTVERSION}-standalone.zip \ + ${INSTALL_DATA} ${DISTDIR}/leiningen-${PORTVERSION}-standalone.jar \ ${STAGEDIR}${DATADIR} =20 .include =2D-- /usr/local/poudriere/ports/default/devel/leiningen/distinfo 2021-11-0= 8 02:25:56.027816000 +0000 +++ distinfo 2021-11-08 02:35:26.927609000 +0000 @@ -1,7 +1,5 @@ =2DTIMESTAMP =3D 1619717089 =2DSHA256 (leiningen-2.9.6-standalone.zip) =3D 41c543f73eec4327dc20e60d5d82= 0fc2a9dc772bc671610b9c385d9c4f5970b8 =2DSIZE (leiningen-2.9.6-standalone.zip) =3D 12760940 =2DSHA256 (technomancy-leiningen-2.9.6_GH0.tar.gz) =3D 2f3b8a7eb710bd3a2669= 75387f216bd4a3bace2f1b0a1f0ae88a93d919d813d9 =2DSIZE (technomancy-leiningen-2.9.6_GH0.tar.gz) =3D 923578 =2DSHA256 (7677dabea40a2d17a42a718ca8c7e450b09e153c.patch) =3D f9459ed6eec5= d84bf0ec2270dce35c30da4cc2dfd1d88fe2070d0706874f0fc5 =2DSIZE (7677dabea40a2d17a42a718ca8c7e450b09e153c.patch) =3D 925 +TIMESTAMP =3D 1636338926 +SHA256 (leiningen-2.9.7-standalone.jar) =3D 82f01414acecddbb0ebd6d571505bb= 671a6fd093236bcdac2468cfe5f2eaa802 +SIZE (leiningen-2.9.7-standalone.jar) =3D 12833202 +SHA256 (technomancy-leiningen-2.9.7_GH0.tar.gz) =3D ab2bae41dde4b5abbf34db= 00f7c3cca592ed73c38e831aaf31c942bbe4e18d34 +SIZE (technomancy-leiningen-2.9.7_GH0.tar.gz) =3D 924476 =2D- Filipe da Silva Santos 102E 1944 2189 31FF 06EB 3F79 760B AE45 F7B3 008E --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQJKBAEBCAA0FiEEEC4ZRCGJMf8G6z95dguuRfezAI4FAmGJdnAWHGNvbnRhY3RA c2hpb3JpLmNvbS5icgAKCRB2C65F97MAjkFhEACE3PZJqHhY+12cQcChPBPJtYbS CHtVzwLok53nEufeXFkOgY7eS5GqWab4xSPT2sWveJJegXV9FmIyTB5hn7GJcmhH 7UZ3jITMaUGI3nYTJJEX+a+kitSsUZhCaJO1FVWK6wVwil5vRJcRzwkv0jyO82GP lbLDde8Z9qiNpBqIJXktqhO8zwSVz1cP84jByAyJjp5ZC4qmAHgnRZaOg+8UcA7c CRnI6TNDBRtzTByw4xtXIUf/nYL2PFhs30e5Wje3o8bddAK1we9OzPR5EedVhL4x 69ceIhfIyBOh4K81juMKvI609inZtCFw6S+zghl8B18xangRwD2UaCDeYM28y0+W AKLMDqzVPRdCz7FkPsG7a6vmiVF2COYqgwm89QKqhjptXOIo4lqfE/F1TvpQp91U mb3c2pCgy+frzQ/ZjazkpqoNcA8vhZk0mIsIF7pSBAFO1i+qf5J1zzxPrXcmsKKy nxkbJydexgf3ZAClGIDG3okZ7bAzkAHb0dF1STc8qa4quViC7In4IcP+R66pG+s8 CHDiPRWDvlc+R6bHYXtHhJMG7TWnMYP78sB8ZqDo0p98D1Ng6q8KC79gV1xhFwkB +AQ5c7or/e2QvtE/jqNwzqe9Yzp96DGMNbK+pAulFlUzzIzKf6sE/rQq6O8IujSb HZbRDIyKP/Z6Prntzw== =kjQf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From nobody Mon Nov 8 20:13:53 2021 X-Original-To: ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 643C6184AC28 for ; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 20:13:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jbeich@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:6074::16:84]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Hp2Pf2W94z4msH; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 20:13:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jbeich@freebsd.org) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1636402438; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=W2FnYQJhlfoAyNczwuWjGoNTZ8v20vVVLnzB4zQSie0=; b=G6cJyXt2TZ790owmGxWPn0nyBqcEIJRKmWoIZIlZxGzsEWgr4jcyEydj5kSyqahZxoFmuE mM8fgiz+4jOWizRCMEQIjDFNtc/E+oQpZNsc9ec/x6LI3Up0KhQEVANp8IJOn7p6I+FH23 nQE+uLUODY4y5RTqoIaLltqlC8EjvpR9n/H13v28Vet6MAuLwX0A5aiodm8d+yHWMICRCT FZLRJH0X66EONGLaEMydDWyBiiOIAMSWUPwVAD9hZ6SIrUPwqderXsWLMZ3MgoF1anYSDK id5jsVmP7k7UcjLi4sGC4ue5yv6OvE7YaaLz/6EezWOTwW6hKPDTS1iSO8kMFg== Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1354) id 4635F18A80; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 20:13:58 +0000 (UTC) From: Jan Beich To: Filipe da Silva Santos Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: devel/leiningen update to 2.9.7 References: <86ilx2fonk.fsf@misaka.lan0> Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2021 21:13:53 +0100 In-Reply-To: <86ilx2fonk.fsf@misaka.lan0> (Filipe da Silva Santos via ports's message of "Mon, 08 Nov 2021 19:11:43 +0000") Message-ID: List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1636402438; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=W2FnYQJhlfoAyNczwuWjGoNTZ8v20vVVLnzB4zQSie0=; b=Xk1bAXjaFs0IkqHnRcJ1SrSBvRgrKxxlSQ+/9H6vFIis8T1ZVXrpxuREM32Ie6RUSuV1Q9 bMbDsQ6nOKgO7ysUMMjZTyRcnrjYldAhzjNBtwnn8MAJTIzrLfxbet2cOfn8oyYvMBYe69 G4M4ToLT60yuW1I57imZgNlOzemouVa1mc7GBP+L6hykrs4tIZOhRc7yqZ70JmrJPIZHva Z61MIrC3x2h+5n++o+iTjMC/TW2rH0XNepgFN6pUBmwaXiPImYV95EcZ/FoFsyLlAqujPR y00HXxHzzXcjGkNWLWMaKzdIY/Czw9PwJo63QFEN8B8C5L8H79HerZ2kcjGaPQ== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1636402438; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=UkhoXUeLGvx+FY1Q+4MZJ+Qtm8VZGHYKKYpOwWa0DEgsueZ5AW++w/YxxV75MaVYNY2Df6 fupcKuICjdLDfxeZe+frj33PwMriF+pTKaVWGgS/Zn1T4ZN5c2VZ6KE/b9KZi8LG8WkBkL NEXbwO3SGRuGwSZDk1OMBQf3iYxkMspFJ/2IHzodDhrAEk+5Vfk0k+niT6cpZxq70bLsPa VUtUfY/r8Oz26Z9vu0avuTVy4GembnrB//ZIS2CqgzfdFPImqD/g0nKVElzUvkuU+q3UGe dVH/J0CzURbXDSNJmVbN8A/yvltEiH5s++iQVQ/B3J4BKGV9GN3pr4HEaAiivQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N Filipe da Silva Santos via ports writes: > Bump to Clojure 1.10.3 (in ports) and fix bugs Landed in https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/ports/commit/?id=816ffe7d1505 Do you need this in /quarterly (2021Q4 branch) as well? From nobody Mon Nov 8 20:28:05 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8D3F183AB36 for ; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 20:28:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list_freebsd@bluerosetech.com) Received: from echo.brtsvcs.net (echo.brtsvcs.net [IPv6:2607:f740:c::4ae]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Hp2kB1P5yz4rsq for ; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 20:28:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list_freebsd@bluerosetech.com) Received: from chombo.houseloki.net (65-100-43-2.dia.static.qwest.net [65.100.43.2]) by echo.brtsvcs.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 62D2B38D32 for ; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 20:28:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.26.25.100] (ivy.pas.ds.pilgrimaccounting.com [10.26.25.100]) by chombo.houseloki.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E28E510504 for ; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 12:28:06 -0800 (PST) To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: Mel Pilgrim Subject: What to do with the "Created by" header comments? Message-ID: <3876a4d9-caab-3adf-0ec9-092cd6ef3b0c@bluerosetech.com> Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2021 12:28:05 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.12.0 List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Hp2kB1P5yz4rsq X-Spamd-Bar: + Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of list_freebsd@bluerosetech.com designates 2607:f740:c::4ae as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=list_freebsd@bluerosetech.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [1.70 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[bluerosetech.com]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(1.00)[1.000]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(1.00)[1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:36236, ipnet:2607:f740:c::/48, country:US]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N In a port I recently submitted, I included the "# Created by: ..." line at the top of the Makefile I had seen in other ports. When the port was committed, that line was excluded. Should I strip this line from ports I maintain as I update them, or let it sit until a committer does a tree-wide removal? From nobody Mon Nov 8 20:58:48 2021 X-Original-To: ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C5C0184A891 for ; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 20:58:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from contact@shiori.com.br) Received: from out2.migadu.com (out2.migadu.com [IPv6:2001:41d0:2:aacc::]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Hp3PV28D4z52cd for ; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 20:58:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from contact@shiori.com.br) X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=shiori.com.br; s=key1; t=1636405133; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=pxUXEFhCbBOji3+JvYvNdSf7aqSGkb4AuTLRohb+/2A=; b=Tb26OYLQXcgCy9D2Xal1Gyn1gNhlMTFXMXcDA0aAPX1Ab7OHZSd5YrDWxuXQrtK+FgCm5P lUU7H9Otw7KvaU9ba4q3eGk3i/WyEQPF2XNOe0240AA+efMvUzhfmK+9P8mhCsSaX9jAk0 yx1jSftRUGeVMY7Ki3WH48U3rS9IZZU= To: Jan Beich Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: devel/leiningen update to 2.9.7 (forgot to Cc sorry) In-Reply-To: References: <86ilx2fonk.fsf@misaka.lan0> Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2021 20:58:48 +0000 Message-ID: <86sfw68iuv.fsf@misaka.lan0> List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT X-Migadu-Auth-User: contact@shiori.com.br X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Hp3PV28D4z52cd X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[] Reply-To: contact@shiori.com.br From: Filipe da Silva Santos via ports X-Original-From: Filipe da Silva Santos X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Jan Beich writes: > Landed in https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/ports/commit/?id=816ffe7d1505 Thank you! > Do you need this in /quarterly (2021Q4 branch) as well? It shouldn't be necessary. Clojure 1.10.3 isn't in ports yet (I'll send a patch soon), so there is no real gain to put in on /quarterly branch. BTW, I forgot to add those two lines: --- /usr/local/poudriere/ports/default/devel/leiningen/Makefile 2021-11-08 20:44:52.224373000 +0000 +++ /home/shiorid/projects/ports/devel/leiningen/Makefile 2021-11-08 20:42:49.806204000 +0000 @@ -11,9 +11,12 @@ LICENSE= EPL LICENSE_FILE= ${WRKSRC}/COPYING +RUN_DEPENDS= clj:lang/clojure + USE_GITHUB= yes GH_ACCOUNT= technomancy USE_JAVA= yes +JAVA_VERSION= 1.8+ NO_ARCH= yes NO_BUILD= yes Cheers! -- Filipe da Silva Santos 102E 1944 2189 31FF 06EB 3F79 760B AE45 F7B3 008E [ signature.asc: application/pgp-signature ] --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQJKBAEBCAA0FiEEEC4ZRCGJMf8G6z95dguuRfezAI4FAmGJj4gWHGNvbnRhY3RA c2hpb3JpLmNvbS5icgAKCRB2C65F97MAju8VD/43ARQgL+Fp4bWK48UNZk3tJeJ/ emH2SDk179ZPfysMwROGajD6UWL66xLG8GzhbfwEmL8DU7vL/UebIZgz7fCISyj+ BzJKnYJtfNFH5Eh8KS+bNN83yIX9Qk3KeLAkOuVHI/2Jm76ryS7kQzowv+cH0G+U mMg3PHu4ReqTKPRDMzILfRnluGfEhFvHk+s1rXAutdp8Ae+u7pkxb+dEX3sJCz+n FrdUdHQFg4BPnpbEeKNIjSca1UGy4zmxrzio8VJW7G984TBY2tndyEWaK0ws8qP0 a6De39Je7Q1tqcJzlZKSN2Q9FPzCdvnGempB6hXDSU+BrsS032gdmq4UVu+ozGrk FFFJrMmh4b6X+j06zpIWJIejwPrZuLZ0TElVE/+R4BC+GiRRZ2eK1omiDcgHWYEf x3lwPi1QfLExhnMZpTt4HJQ8bUIsbRNjkMXpv87xpBdZNFojrwtvv55+5c7b+ih9 RQyTvoIb+JcCY6ifyv0l5AJI3VbluTUAzcBB6zL3LjKMGZ4b9ox9HvsylxbgucPC NvVNx8venxfF1PXy1SASIhXkJ7ehuXCGM1Ps7RHVashKKJDRhqztTCz2gj/btBr8 IZzYlt10L5TCghJV+UBGlVjpynjrba2X6PvqsSu/maOl4AHb0mtq5Jlkm7bm1Vpw 4tt3hKQ6O9zwoAAqIg== =S/lf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From nobody Mon Nov 8 22:07:26 2021 X-Original-To: ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7FB7183FAEF for ; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 22:07:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from contact@shiori.com.br) Received: from out0.migadu.com (out0.migadu.com [IPv6:2001:41d0:2:267::]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Hp4ww38bJz3jb4 for ; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 22:07:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from contact@shiori.com.br) X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=shiori.com.br; s=key1; t=1636409256; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type; bh=eavdAkl/c3SdhHlVm5KsbP2Xc0iALzwx69zbXA0KXXQ=; b=vm6wDFc/zYcClgxI1IEty7vEa8+JrCiP9kZbf24uemhMK7+jTqzZrWn0B4jW8Fs4R90rX7 x9bxbQz7H3wuTUhyRMnGg5RPcCvnJTX6xfzDdrxxWgT9QiH066KaJEAz1UzkRZBoqx0i++ gt/9fiG60RCOETEJCKoA2WDq/VBQ2b0= To: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: FreeBSD port: lang/clojure 1.10.1.447 -> 1.10.3.1020 Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2021 22:07:26 +0000 Message-ID: <86lf1y5mjl.fsf@misaka.lan0> List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT X-Migadu-Auth-User: contact@shiori.com.br X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Hp4ww38bJz3jb4 X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=shiori.com.br header.s=key1 header.b="vm6wDFc/"; dmarc=pass (policy=quarantine) header.from=shiori.com.br; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of contact@shiori.com.br designates 2001:41d0:2:267:: as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=contact@shiori.com.br X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.74 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[shiori.com.br:s=key1]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_MISSING_CHARSET(2.50)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.20)[multipart/signed,text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2001:41d0:2:267::]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[shiori.com.br:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[shiori.com.br,quarantine]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(1.00)[1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.04)[-0.042]; SIGNED_PGP(-2.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_ZERO(0.00)[0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; ASN(0.00)[asn:16276, ipnet:2001:41d0::/32, country:FR]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[2001:41d0:2:267:::from] Reply-To: contact@shiori.com.br From: Filipe da Silva Santos via ports X-Original-From: Filipe da Silva Santos X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Following the devel/leiningen update, let's also bump Clojure version. Since the last update was in 2019, I'm sendind this patch directly to the list. =2D-- /usr/ports/lang/clojure/Makefile 2021-11-02 03:11:14.868390000 +0000 +++ /home/shiorid/projects/ports/lang/clojure/Makefile 2021-11-08 21:33:40.= 466468000 +0000 @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ # Created by: ijliao =20 PORTNAME=3D clojure =2DPORTVERSION=3D 1.10.1.447 +PORTVERSION=3D 1.10.3.1020 CATEGORIES=3D lang lisp java MASTER_SITES=3D https://download.clojure.org/install/ DISTNAME=3D clojure-tools-${PORTVERSION} @@ -23,6 +23,8 @@ WRKSRC=3D ${WRKDIR}/clojure-tools =20 post-patch: + @${REINPLACE_CMD} 's,BINDIR,${PREFIX}\/bin,g' \ + ${WRKSRC}/clj @${REINPLACE_CMD} 's,PREFIX,${DATADIR},g' \ ${WRKSRC}/clojure =2D-- /usr/ports/lang/clojure/pkg-plist 2021-11-02 03:11:14.868490000 +0000 +++ /home/shiorid/projects/ports/lang/clojure/pkg-plist 2021-11-08 21:13:43= .417956000 +0000 @@ -2,6 +2,6 @@ bin/clojure man/man1/clj.1.gz man/man1/clojure.1.gz =2D%%DATADIR%%/libexec/clojure-tools-%%PORTVERSION%%.jar %%DATADIR%%/deps.edn %%DATADIR%%/example-deps.edn +%%DATADIR%%/libexec/clojure-tools-%%PORTVERSION%%.jar =2D- Filipe da Silva Santos 102E 1944 2189 31FF 06EB 3F79 760B AE45 F7B3 008E --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQJKBAEBCAA0FiEEEC4ZRCGJMf8G6z95dguuRfezAI4FAmGJn58WHGNvbnRhY3RA c2hpb3JpLmNvbS5icgAKCRB2C65F97MAjsolEACbq1LLPgCfaF+BoQ52nSPRhmUX 284bgwkqfFZOTLZQ/O77cqNi75s1RAAjUJoaA4X8SxAALIMEkW3Ljtz/jXIM51Kt CE1kkVhgfCu7wrWiGNHg1zY5yR3LOwmvjFcJDKG2ekmf3/lMedSjfuo9NSMb7GMI 4AojdxeXofeI2YojsutIl2iSEz5TAUni7x9A9FXS8ySDHxYNoS/ppyDuPmqHfUxj FVzl5DaJy2Qziko8pzJcj6TE4mGU7UPXu2uacJHABm7dlWuDaov/Ed+JZ9Trx+Jv JQWilpXLmWEMwOTBzEs7MuAFwaSWnipL4Vx8OL5tycxeyivlXDo+E9A2qbXYluu0 Pk6Aj7fisI7k2OpU32vn5oExNTaPReBodRMlMm8v9sqgg34na40hsT3NVwErXEDP CFDBkerMQ08Ss8KMyiIR5o4Cl4fnZRMsqekc36g4mcf9/pM/8zfv+v+nGZ6Yvq59 8O0R8yVlKVerhQ6mR4nP+EvuRSIOpfXihz6t7FLpSfLMRmzvtuDcZ5AkUZyO1brC DUUpp9wNdFMnHNGxQXUDqlZ9bFiKokC+lAUxb9mmapYEsef1eM4adggNYccYjjWz HXf69pLckBaYkNBdInIE7bs5IW917tJMpUty+P4zf5c8CnHBnuqNBEEdqgr5rAgD gEc8gLXUkME2oFdSQg== =gRXC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From nobody Mon Nov 8 22:30:11 2021 X-Original-To: ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08994184CCC4 for ; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 22:30:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jbeich@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [96.47.72.132]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Hp5Qv6cvTz3r3V; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 22:30:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jbeich@freebsd.org) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1636410615; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: references:references; bh=fMvhxIkCfehyA/iq0VDuIi0Kif6L56iKV0pUdgesF/M=; b=ls5xl5sdFkmeM22Q3DTmboIJKDX2Z03K1i7nf/KHrFH2qCqXayaIEoPhVLrND3hSwy5zsZ nKvkczPEAc0z9APpP1p0BtuhoW8rjIUIKcFT3vehe3eMGqjL3HKNCKjNrI/pDBLZXWo59a Vp0P5ty/VheajIyPfdokzyysSMYe1uKEi7pheaob+iFo51jJjf5GaYg6c96rj/lhexIhuC wGkgGnLwiqlELy3G7RQOcymX1KbgZ2OOR4uoEW57DSKfxJU9kUFOUH94p9cjAShguUF6SE nWVuSs14BP3+ZsFRAXxTdwkxHkIfG7qMKKRdajlokdXGZG64j5j3lNP5FtBunQ== Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1354) id D3C0819381; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 22:30:15 +0000 (UTC) From: Jan Beich To: Filipe da Silva Santos Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: devel/leiningen update to 2.9.7 (forgot to Cc sorry) References: <86ilx2fonk.fsf@misaka.lan0> <86sfw68iuv.fsf@misaka.lan0> Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2021 23:30:11 +0100 Message-ID: List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1636410615; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: references:references; bh=fMvhxIkCfehyA/iq0VDuIi0Kif6L56iKV0pUdgesF/M=; b=s1NiipfXRovRAqOoTOuDyuKpobHu6686YN94kTpQ7KGusIp7hy/eioFBoQDdkT0dbki6Qt 9zXcsQ5CDR3hSXMKDFCj3TCif19zaeSLsPx4KsQZshGjCkaUav+hJcdneo9u+YjDsvFDJa FvqnJe2FemnmXZ928AYGHNfDy6CLE3WWUpjy/RfILPfDtDboAPoohHrb438gUhu5n7azE6 1z9VfZRmo0JuuYIRDv4qtA/hMmR/TPl34vOIcZCKnmdpXL/mD3SE2PWaw+13n2w56sL98q wF19TrFqq6+1Im+w2+E1i8G8OEbIzrVT+cdKUkDw3gSI1F7qpWnoMOT0J5AEPg== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1636410615; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=QNT0sBSZ3t02qvzSVVlbfA0BBSc4dXZQdTHIKtl5rYS21aYZdzjT6EOF0/XVNs7CMje1sI TZubFpja6nKybO/Dr4WRGIqPPZwdao7rFuBD57KaUweNxSnfIk+ypZNxiGSeQpMTpn99QW wIU/V++yz7O1OZ5xRFI1+liXuHZR9XAxxlPyihlQlWMmhKwZ0HH/FI/KDDrr11GpeZdoLD Bv2klX8fRxstTowlM3BlNYoO4tDGRdvzfrLgad6MBCk/3wDGE9GOeUseztyK7hLrIndhlT 0RW7Bw6p9E48SBv6mtyEc/W6kyyLrVq19XPo02JX9pAwRbfoMtF3DUVqo5t+dg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N Filipe da Silva Santos writes: > BTW, I forgot to add those two lines: > > --- /usr/local/poudriere/ports/default/devel/leiningen/Makefile 2021-11-08 20:44:52.224373000 +0000 > +++ /home/shiorid/projects/ports/devel/leiningen/Makefile 2021-11-08 20:42:49.806204000 +0000 > @@ -11,9 +11,12 @@ > LICENSE= EPL > LICENSE_FILE= ${WRKSRC}/COPYING > > +RUN_DEPENDS= clj:lang/clojure Rationale to put into the commit message is missing. (a) leiningen /seems/ to work without clojure installed. (b) leiningen source doesn't reference "clj" binary. (c) leiningen in other distributions (Alpine, Arch, Gentoo, Nix, Void) doesn't depend on clojure package. I'm asking because this change seems unrelated to 2.9.7 update. $ pkg delete clojure $ lein repl As of 2.8.2, the repl task is incompatible with Clojure versions older than 1.7.0. You can downgrade to 2.8.1 or use `lein trampoline run -m clojure.main` for a simpler fallback repl. Subprocess failed (exit code: 1) ^C $ lein trampoline run -m clojure.main Reflection warning, /tmp/form-init12345.clj:1 - call to invokeStaticMethod can't be resolved. Clojure 1.3.0 user=> (first '(a b c)) a user=> (print "hello\n") hello nil $ cd $(make -V WRKSRC)/test_projects/sample $ lein compile Retrieving codox/codox/0.6.4/codox-0.6.4.pom from clojars Retrieving codox/codox.leiningen/0.6.4/codox.leiningen-0.6.4.pom from clojars Retrieving leinjacker/leinjacker/0.4.1/leinjacker-0.4.1.pom from clojars Retrieving org/clojure/core.contracts/0.0.1/core.contracts-0.0.1.pom from central Retrieving org/clojure/pom.contrib/0.0.26/pom.contrib-0.0.26.pom from central Retrieving org/sonatype/oss/oss-parent/5/oss-parent-5.pom from central Retrieving org/clojure/core.unify/0.5.3/core.unify-0.5.3.pom from central Retrieving org/clojure/clojure/1.4.0/clojure-1.4.0.pom from central Retrieving org/clojure/core.contracts/0.0.1/core.contracts-0.0.1.jar from central Retrieving org/clojure/core.unify/0.5.3/core.unify-0.5.3.jar from central Retrieving org/clojure/clojure/1.4.0/clojure-1.4.0.jar from central Retrieving codox/codox/0.6.4/codox-0.6.4.jar from clojars Retrieving leinjacker/leinjacker/0.4.1/leinjacker-0.4.1.jar from clojars Retrieving codox/codox.leiningen/0.6.4/codox.leiningen-0.6.4.jar from clojars From nobody Mon Nov 8 22:38:44 2021 X-Original-To: ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CB5F1852026 for ; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 22:38:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jbeich@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [96.47.72.132]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Hp5cn43CNz3v71; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 22:38:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jbeich@freebsd.org) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1636411129; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=lQcj6xmsAuE93fDSXBcCfG6YZVk74ZA0muuFumMlsMQ=; b=BGnFq9CyVzbwwsx3BIF9s9GCKA1MEuaBWZKHS575RSoFULZ9+dZm2MNXSabzWBSSfT3rQm hOCw/GiWp0enbolAyG5H32OSjXidfKZnUaGeBL6/xiywXa6jfed2Fqq2JG9ZcHmHi5O2j8 rtYW2Purs+mKN6GZ76znGNLAHS4P/VnjluDD9jUAgnB8saJm9O9dZ50MJgyJocjAEcRq3c QrRgTvfBc7wWBTzwyLr1DfHhNWQQy+vBbOT2BWSt3xah22HFliQKja39gwFjKMWKN8//Vw dyOL52MAJRytBHUoBGu3z0GTJjg4G246MnPqziOTxpNToP0ojdyOorFiSAmKLw== Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1354) id 7D419190EF; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 22:38:49 +0000 (UTC) From: Jan Beich To: Filipe da Silva Santos Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: devel/leiningen update to 2.9.7 (forgot to Cc sorry) References: <86ilx2fonk.fsf@misaka.lan0> <86sfw68iuv.fsf@misaka.lan0> Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2021 23:38:44 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Jan Beich's message of "Mon, 08 Nov 2021 23:30:11 +0100") Message-ID: List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1636411129; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=lQcj6xmsAuE93fDSXBcCfG6YZVk74ZA0muuFumMlsMQ=; b=DJslVof5+hJ7pkkPdrIo6Vojc0qJ5NbAGQLgMqe94SIwaSVjWGnOIN8eUtheFaxXbMa4YT YTyvtakZuDg3WBUJGtVWj/M9Q88mBocAeRAc9cl1dfuRym7MYGkhSmv9KLyUC4DSypgtWS m0uKdA+EjDYEqAmbXlCEH+N4Yh+zaNYKLSFcpMhpsJ5y5vf4cq3EIDH4Zstac8X0LuXqTd idwITVMkkYAYbMKWFd0cn4cOVtv9ONnvKlBf6tRWrX96Pa6t1kT94KU95LvcOYH34qW3Z1 KndNii+1QFeYmn0Z4WxWsNMkP2V2BrjQIvOuq7T1lFCOsitPq1yWybXi3umQ9g== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1636411129; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=rxluiby7yhrhgR3H+ExAwfsU9tbzXuk96RlvGHngaomo6rgKzAzeI4zbe6Ctrn+tkkttUX J4qiX96xgsi9x9vCKo9QlEheOFnLOv3GAD4qlfVg9e2/xGbztuVl4eQBff+VVl8DawSXOt 4/zCjvsJuEKJDnrE1BMHV5YjRpV7v5ziQLdFmJJ+WZwtKSz3RHZx7d6axHXlaXRlj8G0Qp TwpbHD/r/QBTrTi7mM3LfArG1Y+BpUC6GDoOZdLkFJlpDPd3owyBoIjmBIOX3SrVPcbYuC d2tZa0vYAJUYVY3BGtoLqZsmRJlLlsddO9ZJ2oX/XYVaE7Ck6Lk557NQdSkoaA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N Jan Beich writes: > $ lein repl > As of 2.8.2, the repl task is incompatible with Clojure versions older than 1.7.0. > You can downgrade to 2.8.1 or use `lein trampoline run -m clojure.main` for a simpler fallback repl. > Subprocess failed (exit code: 1) > ^C Nevermind "Subprocess failed" part. Only happens when testing under WRKSRC, probably because it inherits environment from the project under current directory. From nobody Mon Nov 8 22:42:13 2021 X-Original-To: ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0EE81852773 for ; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 22:42:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jbeich@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:6074::16:84]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Hp5hn6b6Tz3vxZ; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 22:42:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jbeich@freebsd.org) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1636411337; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=dvNS8700astAFJTrYqO1B3kiC62pT+dizRK8hYbr5T8=; b=xtu3a/Y4oBqkUeB9ZQjEQFd+QdsyCTcKWshNGJzMXnwrbvcifycxR5jOc9/SrR8uYAsW0l oqVwFwcyFUtoRRGa8j9DvrRA1vyxjR1lG0QJfIXYjqaVqxgPPIoxGhgq8HVJedZ62GRSUt yxkHE7Vimu5luTTZdZV8BLhhpU9DbXeMR9DyZJY0qVIDfza4CPJK3VTDBuJDNd/jWH7/8D KqRUhqnzBWHSQnRIhzPrG6qQRtSOKu2if7GivpG06SbAKpADSQrn0FDmG02f0o75mdG129 cas38fazfHQINrKKSUrbvFSUGjpbBWROT5uvBiRqLRPGVuLMAiEkOt90SEaNpA== Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1354) id CA510193B1; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 22:42:17 +0000 (UTC) From: Jan Beich To: Filipe da Silva Santos via ports Cc: contact@shiori.com.br Subject: Re: FreeBSD port: lang/clojure 1.10.1.447 -> 1.10.3.1020 References: <86lf1y5mjl.fsf@misaka.lan0> Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2021 23:42:13 +0100 In-Reply-To: <86lf1y5mjl.fsf@misaka.lan0> (Filipe da Silva Santos via ports's message of "Mon, 08 Nov 2021 22:07:26 +0000") Message-ID: List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1636411337; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=dvNS8700astAFJTrYqO1B3kiC62pT+dizRK8hYbr5T8=; b=ncmqVu+33WkvSe0f+rNIFsFP3A1U9ycFL1w1jE+DyM0PMh5PNRRP/SuRR76hp+NxCccUXy h/vN/J4oBEajQMjczoZaNjXW7SiAhpu8EK2tspFKs0UeST6EOj8LubX5mu0mIYHApQ9OSh LJY8UJPeNMPaQOhl9gNHo8kME33+xbOaeZ77s8nd/4mqxBJy9nHZSd7R2mMpE3CkeUKDD4 dqBSqSLur3w9++jmUuqHKJ9iZibAso1GBPtOSEsY5/cXFPRewuz4h46XJ4SyEkG3wSdH7D yR25dF6B/aN5NRv52Rvk2TfpxdbxvM3XpRB50FDZtECuzDE8qHaAMrj8ZoYqew== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1636411337; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=rtKmVeGdq/5BM2q8jemcjjHIAR5d7G6JBWX6JKNlThKCY815++vQxNyrPh3I3Ni4nIec/N 5z2r3lCUrX/9Q7yuCpryrdxAOJ2QQgNc5ePMxcRESZAyiYv8mdoqIqGaixnpbMH7BKSAGr CoaWC7KnG7125ry7zqavOhIyFV1YQf3aty5XIjWDpEZpwOmNyaAi6o0n0NkRAhRE1tkAlz tNYc8enZR1PGcfhgzap2LAoW9NPj3QiBjHziScGZ0Mv4g5vF9aCxFFjTUoiSx6QjyBWBTQ Gvx72pFJcD7SVoQzEgHkLFlMOah5AcnYii9hGUsyBl1FkHpOxVdWBN+63/8HOQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N Filipe da Silva Santos via ports writes: > Following the devel/leiningen update, let's also bump Clojure version. > > Since the last update was in 2019, I'm sendind this patch directly to > the list. > > --- /usr/ports/lang/clojure/Makefile 2021-11-02 03:11:14.868390000 +0000 > +++ /home/shiorid/projects/ports/lang/clojure/Makefile 2021-11-08 21:33:40.466468000 +0000 [...] > --- /usr/ports/lang/clojure/pkg-plist 2021-11-02 03:11:14.868490000 +0000 > +++ /home/shiorid/projects/ports/lang/clojure/pkg-plist 2021-11-08 21:13:43.417956000 +0000 [...] lang/clojure/distinfo part is missing: $ make clean patch ===> Cleaning for clojure-1.10.3.1020 ===> License EPL accepted by the user ===> clojure-1.10.3.1020 depends on file: /usr/local/sbin/pkg - found => clojure-tools-1.10.3.1020.tar.gz is not in /usr/ports/lang/clojure/distinfo. => Either /usr/ports/lang/clojure/distinfo is out of date, or => clojure-tools-1.10.3.1020.tar.gz is spelled incorrectly. *** Error code 1 From nobody Mon Nov 8 22:52:18 2021 X-Original-To: ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 800F3183836E for ; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 22:52:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jbeich@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:6074::16:84]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Hp5wR3HGLz4Tdr; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 22:52:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jbeich@freebsd.org) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1636411943; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Z/GDXDcWvGiZhDLpZTf4N2+gyAYNJEl4Q4kWZqrR7Tk=; b=USgNbX8V4uQJFPHy2kEUvwCj2aZXv4YnmgYE95tZjtBscTsG15SHlCOpIUObU5DMfyidVC jD+98VI7PvdTEvKNn9F+nYhOPg2cy7fArCCoZ+Fxdz39SrHl7S/2/53UkZRNFLusGvN8Tf 0DuyxnTVN+NphoA5/aPpfuiApU90XXF9Zs7ZCNZrrJ0E6VuPA19j+cgGag/hGQHQI1yBVz Go9Rf8ZyX+raLfeU8DOjckYUkqLnH1+i/vbujbmccpqPDQxwv9sgy7u2Q3r0GYMVasRYYk aXRR21iuVUaLqJ+F5+9epW+bs9D6+w/sgIykgxublbtfoCxO6n/aSw72OAXstA== Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1354) id 58352193D0; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 22:52:23 +0000 (UTC) From: Jan Beich To: Filipe da Silva Santos via ports Cc: contact@shiori.com.br Subject: Re: FreeBSD port: lang/clojure 1.10.1.447 -> 1.10.3.1020 References: <86lf1y5mjl.fsf@misaka.lan0> Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2021 23:52:18 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Jan Beich's message of "Mon, 08 Nov 2021 23:42:13 +0100") Message-ID: <4k8m-6z19-wny@FreeBSD.org> List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1636411943; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Z/GDXDcWvGiZhDLpZTf4N2+gyAYNJEl4Q4kWZqrR7Tk=; b=Oregr3I2sm44Ly2IlEMIOLhdRDf6RGm+oJvb2e5FPAC8g6Kk0RnQ2YF3ibRcxpKZjGGTC4 LihLsPjA8JpKZJvCkgd/LLnMVUVaMvhshVGcoiACtFyh0ul/968EjdLpOrMS4RAl/Ws0aL 9wyBBTZj7KicsEmBsLn76HZVT5XUrmd7nKnuTTT0zXd3ck5E8tOkBjn0WLbE199DfIgkNM aTBDTa6ybjN4MgwN4rFfWMitv11bo+bLcuzkayI6h+ZWrV8AQ/jfL53opdim4cQtgh41yS 2+G17+Xs5oopNA7T3BqezJrX7Sk25wfmGC9GPjKgSjgpJMIFOlqbY2VdXTm6Gw== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1636411943; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=hSSxw2ehcUEIfzPOtIokmq+xRbjfuxshITb22nMt5jH21w1ovCsA6iWD0V0aIJTwbLPhIB WZmllfrEmrgb4DSzuCQxovFYUXqxgL+oh1rkyOsf/ik4OmcUstuAREHtS/kRx1+40bZXmm Dr3q1IlNNvNJACvKiAMMDw56Hw6aqgXgP2Wa9PnLojk9AiH4TEjsbEUV6VLzcsQIOc3Y8N PG7O/63s97zGBV0hRX+ES680UuakZvMRgh6eLFxFBzvpyro/Wp8pLQCGB+l4ZDhBL5Dq+q dy0AFse+lMlU2vSH1waAltOS1SrtA3b395mR8GfHMYgX7vqevFG2R2dWd5T2ew== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N Jan Beich writes: > Filipe da Silva Santos via ports writes: > >> Following the devel/leiningen update, let's also bump Clojure version. >> >> Since the last update was in 2019, I'm sendind this patch directly to >> the list. >> >> --- /usr/ports/lang/clojure/Makefile 2021-11-02 03:11:14.868390000 +0000 >> +++ /home/shiorid/projects/ports/lang/clojure/Makefile 2021-11-08 21:33:40.466468000 +0000 > [...] >> --- /usr/ports/lang/clojure/pkg-plist 2021-11-02 03:11:14.868490000 +0000 >> +++ /home/shiorid/projects/ports/lang/clojure/pkg-plist 2021-11-08 21:13:43.417956000 +0000 > [...] > > lang/clojure/distinfo part is missing: > > $ make clean patch > ===> Cleaning for clojure-1.10.3.1020 > ===> License EPL accepted by the user > ===> clojure-1.10.3.1020 depends on file: /usr/local/sbin/pkg - found > => clojure-tools-1.10.3.1020.tar.gz is not in /usr/ports/lang/clojure/distinfo. > => Either /usr/ports/lang/clojure/distinfo is out of date, or > => clojure-tools-1.10.3.1020.tar.gz is spelled incorrectly. > *** Error code 1 After "make makesum" it passed poudriere and looked OK, so landed in https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/ports/commit/?id=99b204e32d00 From nobody Tue Nov 9 03:14:16 2021 X-Original-To: ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18EF11858294 for ; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 03:14:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tatsuki_makino@hotmail.com) Received: from APC01-PU1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-oln040092254090.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.92.254.90]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.protection.outlook.com", Issuer "DigiCert Cloud Services CA-1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HpCkv5HZfz4tTM; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 03:14:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tatsuki_makino@hotmail.com) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=FMLi5gnxbV+X9NjlluUJ1JF1l7aNe/ocWfIdWL2bxOKOV59nnuSRAZszWUNRxMNUsp9EVdrI3EyC1oiIrxFJ+NSTEp37M04Jr/m4AxEj4ePYmiMdJyp/VxcyDW0YuBVYn0t5hcUv0GKBxqnfJTMZgFNQNfvTWBqgG5QPJnpI1pAZeWERDeOX3iy0cU6ON4lLUy0e5vsNgSKYAxTPg3NS7QsYeSFMXganKwXNJJOpvjybsK/AE03Ps+sJfV2Mzg041qWmnqYpJaUKDyQDEOQhJBcfHBz1KNBtI8Gfb5FtBqCxwWuv9xn0Siju28NJiM0BGfnvPIDK8S3bQO//d1J6tw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=Fq0Xdf6khCvdUCtmAu8JBqFnZJ0R4Rb9dAyivBN9w0k=; b=M1c3BUZb2Mu9SppxAtpa6haWp0OoSMd/FgU0+wlu4eMlOmwyn4FEZDt+405rG37KvXcPWluCg0bSyjda6ivblrnMAhmvVZnPg/MJJbaZg/r1yv6OEVlbqiNi/8RebfTeU6XF7YZTbbOamXs6Um5d2KJv5dz8/SCRN/u136TWWHA1ahIfD/BthJTJ2jebIrwSHPp8EuAJD70GqLQIx5O1rHfPqeCEWq9oh2KIwLqfWdCwbr5VqJnERmJBpfzJHFYan2EgEluJ19Oj08NbcWG6+uApCmyydF/z8RJOyU/CKlD0LC+BV7NPp+BmHRqFN85vc5RmcR8014bHTzzrhLO7GQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=none; dmarc=none; dkim=none; arc=none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hotmail.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=Fq0Xdf6khCvdUCtmAu8JBqFnZJ0R4Rb9dAyivBN9w0k=; b=ojooFlMCuTEStmrxAKY8eVBdVnZbhaNxTMkTP1/MTSQeixpOlwxoxL/KCQab2kmYWQb7yQbhVdnk09f8l4OhbqbHMSsGll2ERkP2ohaGS3WuRFb/0yOEJHCnh8no30sGobrPOP/CPvFrVm9aklAnR0JKw0/HEOyb28mNsiA7oMD8Vucm/246rbSBZEpLwBEEBMBRzxJNOsYQY5zRN7JCIcq+mqU5XBZZqPzE40ovmntn+dV05nnahWUuG5eIZ4Wv6R2rbgWAMEnjwlRfA6RoGHejj3VMHHClAyhRlwWdFi0dnXfIyTJOMjR0snhqw9p+bmBp+gDbaLO7k3d1LmMjmg== Received: from PSAPR03MB5639.apcprd03.prod.outlook.com (2603:1096:301:66::13) by PS1PR03MB5019.apcprd03.prod.outlook.com (2603:1096:300:87::23) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.4690.8; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 03:14:22 +0000 Received: from PSAPR03MB5639.apcprd03.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::35ac:1575:caf8:7b91]) by PSAPR03MB5639.apcprd03.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::35ac:1575:caf8:7b91%5]) with mapi id 15.20.4690.015; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 03:14:22 +0000 Subject: Re: cyrus-sasl dependency in bsd.ldap.mk To: Juraj Lutter , d@delphij.net Cc: ports@freebsd.org References: <6F18C72A-D3FF-4135-9E7B-24D423F8489F@FreeBSD.org> <11853a40-85dc-e562-8883-1f1d3a7a7d20@delphij.net> From: Tatsuki Makino Message-ID: Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2021 12:14:16 +0900 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/52.0 SeaMonkey/2.49.4 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TMN: [r5Ix3FNPOuzfxsefcIlAAioFwMNuKB/4] X-ClientProxiedBy: TYWPR01CA0025.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com (2603:1096:400:aa::12) To PSAPR03MB5639.apcprd03.prod.outlook.com (2603:1096:301:66::13) X-Microsoft-Original-Message-ID: List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MS-Exchange-MessageSentRepresentingType: 1 Received: from T4.test (121.93.137.124) by TYWPR01CA0025.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com (2603:1096:400:aa::12) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.4669.11 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 03:14:18 +0000 X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: 85bf91df-0a17-4697-7744-08d9a32f0484 X-MS-Exchange-SLBlob-MailProps: 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 X-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: PS1PR03MB5019: X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0; X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info: 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 X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount: 1 X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0: 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 X-OriginatorOrg: sct-15-20-3174-8-msonline-outlook-792b7.templateTenant X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 85bf91df-0a17-4697-7744-08d9a32f0484 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: PSAPR03MB5639.apcprd03.prod.outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Nov 2021 03:14:21.8933 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-RMS-PersistedConsumerOrg: 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000 X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: PS1PR03MB5019 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4HpCkv5HZfz4tTM X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N I thought sasl and openldap were merged a long time ago. Isn't there something wrong with postfix that the ldap and sasl options are separated? From nobody Tue Nov 9 15:00:40 2021 X-Original-To: ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E07C185C3F1 for ; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 15:00:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HpWPj0h1qz4g8D for ; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 15:00:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (portscout.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC14326F0D for ; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 15:00:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.nyi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.10]) by portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 1A9F0ea1013741 for ; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 15:00:40 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 1A9F0eKg013731; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 15:00:40 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <202111091500.1A9F0eKg013731@portscout.nyi.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.nyi.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2021 15:00:40 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ net/remotebox | 2.7 | 2.8 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Reported by: portscout! From nobody Tue Nov 9 15:33:11 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CD8E1847D0D for ; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 15:33:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from luca.pizzamiglio@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ed1-f42.google.com (mail-ed1-f42.google.com [209.85.208.42]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1D4" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HpX7s3fhbz4scX for ; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 15:33:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from luca.pizzamiglio@gmail.com) Received: by mail-ed1-f42.google.com with SMTP id v11so75899425edc.9 for ; Tue, 09 Nov 2021 07:33:45 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=idx+b6iRmHWkjKXcEfj4FzjRkh/MQhQnHpExfGmjCyo=; b=JARpsEYnok0oxbNqryVCd6HWj7LRSm+618Nj3EKE9jdSYH1/4e7A37WQka+OOI1pDY n6U2oqGdEbtU4TupZFnJbdbDQTLGGLH27qECJpLKWpcjZf1KGitLa+xmv8AF4lpjBLlw Eqkv5W6BA2q66udhZcTahVrQW4htdyqhC5osHwCyQE7FJKwcVj2rs6nQyeG8wOehQqAV dcF1pavO7vUmuozwlb2VuOv1YpqmnytGH8p5/1MxTCn0KIccPphbp0+f8qDAe/E+hSKw Z5HGSuhhsFB0MjdSACAOlXFq+R9d3pCKHcz0s0o3Zf3Pnh+VpCfd3XyEys98X4J7562g zWYQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532+lPkPeRlsp1XNvqlT72NuciwUXOCYwAy7FCBaVGtpjfRFTNhS Bw4ODZMlKcAF+PIIl5lbzR5w/M+715xQOw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw5lB7p0cB2ENXEnmT3a9ywRWfjq0+XBoEvV/UV7GsV7aDvCuJYgiUB07tb7OgONWWxHXbRYw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:94ca:: with SMTP id dn10mr10887346ejc.263.1636472018043; Tue, 09 Nov 2021 07:33:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-ed1-f47.google.com (mail-ed1-f47.google.com. [209.85.208.47]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q2sm11339025edh.44.2021.11.09.07.33.37 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 09 Nov 2021 07:33:37 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ed1-f47.google.com with SMTP id f4so77974345edx.12 for ; Tue, 09 Nov 2021 07:33:37 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:77c8:: with SMTP id kz8mr10853844ejc.188.1636472017028; Tue, 09 Nov 2021 07:33:37 -0800 (PST) List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <3876a4d9-caab-3adf-0ec9-092cd6ef3b0c@bluerosetech.com> In-Reply-To: <3876a4d9-caab-3adf-0ec9-092cd6ef3b0c@bluerosetech.com> From: Luca Pizzamiglio Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2021 16:33:11 +0100 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: What to do with the "Created by" header comments? To: Mel Pilgrim Cc: FreeBSD Ports mailing list Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000042892105d05cd528" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4HpX7s3fhbz4scX X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: Y --00000000000042892105d05cd528 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hi Mel, IIRC the "# Created by: ..." line was added to give credits to the original creator of the port. I'm not sure if this is still a thing. Best regards, pizzamig On Mon, Nov 8, 2021 at 9:28 PM Mel Pilgrim wrote: > In a port I recently submitted, I included the "# Created by: ..." line > at the top of the Makefile I had seen in other ports. When the port was > committed, that line was excluded. > > Should I strip this line from ports I maintain as I update them, or let > it sit until a committer does a tree-wide removal? > > --00000000000042892105d05cd528-- From nobody Tue Nov 9 15:48:53 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 784071851602 for ; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 15:48:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from madpilot@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [96.47.72.83]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HpXTN34GRz3J0j; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 15:48:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from madpilot@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [172.24.42.13] (host-79-35-132-168.retail.telecomitalia.it [79.35.132.168]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: madpilot/mail) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D665B2637D; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 15:48:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from madpilot@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2021 16:48:53 +0100 List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.3.0 Subject: Re: What to do with the "Created by" header comments? Content-Language: en-US To: Luca Pizzamiglio , Mel Pilgrim Cc: FreeBSD Ports mailing list References: <3876a4d9-caab-3adf-0ec9-092cd6ef3b0c@bluerosetech.com> From: Guido Falsi In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam: Yes X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N On 09/11/21 16:33, Luca Pizzamiglio wrote: > Hi Mel, > > IIRC the "# Created by: ..." line was added to give credits to the original > creator of the port. > I'm not sure if this is still a thing. > As far as I remember (please correct me if I'm wrong) it's deprecated and should not be added to newly created ports, also because the information is easy to find in the repo history. I don't think there is any rule for existing ones, I personally leave them there unless requested to do anything different. -- Guido Falsi From nobody Tue Nov 9 19:43:29 2021 X-Original-To: ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B889C183C7F2 for ; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 19:43:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nick1974@videotron.ca) Received: from alt41.smtp-out.videotron.ca (alt41.smtp-out.videotron.ca [23.233.128.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "vl-vm-csp356.ip.videotron.ca", Issuer "int-SNINTCAP1-CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Hpdh95sc5z3NFv for ; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 19:43:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nick1974@videotron.ca) Received: from [10.0.0.100] ([74.57.41.84]) by Videotron with ESMTPA id kX1lmxge6HF5ckX1nmGgqM; Tue, 09 Nov 2021 14:43:31 -0500 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.4 cv=JsCSEO0C c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=618acf63 a=YSmth2V6eAkZd8ZJNDX8tg==:117 a=YSmth2V6eAkZd8ZJNDX8tg==:17 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=4lWgX7AkAAAA:8 a=DQVh-C2cRevy9xuXaRQA:9 a=D8H4bWiJGtFWUoFAfKj/bpVjoms=:19 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=xKsq6wVa59IA:10 a=zdLwxQF_y90A:10 a=Z_2vQz1otnd_yy6jcJY2:22 Message-ID: Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2021 14:43:29 -0500 List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.3.0 To: "ports@FreeBSD.org" Content-Language: fr From: Nicolas Boisvert Subject: Request for BubbleUPnP Server Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4xfNalGr7bUYubX3holjMsBIW33/8yayGfIN4RYyrK9Ugde/P68j4wf3m/Ld75n9w+pVQ9OHG6162BL4HXGuGkmD/WBwOQKCwKL+AK7ovoddswGXRKZWe6 3HgQpSsXbaFzes9e138t0imm5AGYRSC/UqBNTw+m9tdq6pt6D+ldo4m1dIoe78vC51UyryvprTgsUA== X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Hpdh95sc5z3NFv X-Spamd-Bar: ++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of nick1974@videotron.ca designates 23.233.128.28 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=nick1974@videotron.ca X-Spamd-Result: default: False [2.58 / 15.00]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[videotron.ca]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:23.233.128.28/30]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.98)[0.981]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[videotron.ca]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(1.00)[1.000]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(1.00)[1.000]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:5769, ipnet:23.233.128.0/18, country:CA]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[videotron.ca]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[23.233.128.28:from] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N Hello all, There is an install for Linux (.db), one for Synology and one for Java. Can requests be made in this mailing list? https://www.bubblesoftapps.com/bubbleupnpserver2/docs/linux_install.html From nobody Tue Nov 9 19:50:35 2021 X-Original-To: ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9EE71840968 for ; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 19:50:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ygy@freebsd.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [96.47.72.83]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HpdrP5yYNz3QPF for ; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 19:50:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ygy@freebsd.org) Received: from mail-wm1-f48.google.com (mail-wm1-f48.google.com [209.85.128.48]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1D4" (verified OK)) (Authenticated sender: ygy) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A4401284D1 for ; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 19:50:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ygy@freebsd.org) Received: by mail-wm1-f48.google.com with SMTP id f7-20020a1c1f07000000b0032ee11917ceso318779wmf.0 for ; Tue, 09 Nov 2021 11:50:45 -0800 (PST) X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM53201dbg1e80nwCowzAj+rmBravW8lliaDtivLJnwEUXl79CmkLF s6tjQEzHnUv0xIPeq032jCY5PWok9jPE5FWEkf4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy3lxvNYYFRb09PJrykj8BXF5jXtCVRAeBfXe/zZsN3OtN4JUsdSQ7Nc5qdgqhnJPr0v/MMzeIjd7Fbm/21KBs= X-Received: by 2002:a1c:4d13:: with SMTP id o19mr9984270wmh.164.1636487444525; Tue, 09 Nov 2021 11:50:44 -0800 (PST) List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Guangyuan Yang Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2021 14:50:35 -0500 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: Request for BubbleUPnP Server To: Nicolas Boisvert Cc: "ports@FreeBSD.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N Nicolas Boisvert =E4=BA=8E2021=E5=B9=B411=E6=9C=889= =E6=97=A5=E5=91=A8=E4=BA=8C =E4=B8=8B=E5=8D=882:44=E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC= =9A > > Hello all, > > There is an install for Linux (.db), one for Synology and one for Java. > > Can requests be made in this mailing list? > > https://www.bubblesoftapps.com/bubbleupnpserver2/docs/linux_install.html > > > Hi, Please feel free to open a bug report at https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/. On a quick look, the porting of this software should be doable. Best, --=20 Guangyuan Yang ygy@FreeBSD.org From nobody Tue Nov 9 22:43:31 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B9F81853A9A; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 22:43:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [96.47.72.83]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Hpjgw3z72z3NkS; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 22:43:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from tensor.andric.com (tensor.andric.com [87.251.56.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "tensor.andric.com", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) (Authenticated sender: dim) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4E75E2A37D; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 22:43:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtpclient.apple (longrow.home.andric.com [192.168.0.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tensor.andric.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B581A52DA4; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 23:43:38 +0100 (CET) From: Dimitry Andric Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_6AB25700-4855-488D-9360-D7F14B39D61B"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.120.0.1.13\)) Subject: HEADS UP: intent to merge clang/llvm 13.0.0 the coming weekend Message-Id: Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2021 23:43:31 +0100 To: FreeBSD Current , FreeBSD Ports X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.120.0.1.13) X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N --Apple-Mail=_6AB25700-4855-488D-9360-D7F14B39D61B Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Hi, This is a heads-up so that you are aware I'm intending to merge clang/llvm 13.0.0 the coming weekend, e.g. somewhere between Sat 2021-11-13 and Sun 2021-11-14. The source of the merge will be , which I regularly sync up with our main branch. I think most of the important ports issues found via the exp-run bug (https://bugs.freebsd.org/258209) are now ironed out, but if you have suggestions for ones that have failed in the exp-run but are not fixed yet, and are important to you, please submit feedback on the bug. (Or create a new bug and link it.) Also, if there are other reasons to postpone the merge, please let me know. -Dimitry --Apple-Mail=_6AB25700-4855-488D-9360-D7F14B39D61B Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.2 iF0EARECAB0WIQR6tGLSzjX8bUI5T82wXqMKLiCWowUCYYr5kwAKCRCwXqMKLiCW o0wpAJ4v4Ez2vPwXwsCeQPV5KehEjpxoDQCfdj60+Ze/BbvTyj+iHnaq8s+nXc4= =u187 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_6AB25700-4855-488D-9360-D7F14B39D61B-- From nobody Wed Nov 10 02:07:42 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EA061856B35 for ; Wed, 10 Nov 2021 02:07:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list_freebsd@bluerosetech.com) Received: from echo.brtsvcs.net (echo.brtsvcs.net [208.111.40.118]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HppCX2T82z3m4f for ; Wed, 10 Nov 2021 02:07:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list_freebsd@bluerosetech.com) Received: from chombo.houseloki.net (65-100-43-2.dia.static.qwest.net [65.100.43.2]) by echo.brtsvcs.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E28D238D0D for ; Wed, 10 Nov 2021 02:07:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.26.25.100] (ivy.pas.ds.pilgrimaccounting.com [10.26.25.100]) by chombo.houseloki.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4452911181 for ; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 18:07:43 -0800 (PST) To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: Mel Pilgrim Subject: Running php-composer as part of a build process Message-ID: Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2021 18:07:42 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.12.0 List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4HppCX2T82z3m4f X-Spamd-Bar: ++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of list_freebsd@bluerosetech.com designates 208.111.40.118 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=list_freebsd@bluerosetech.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [2.70 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(1.00)[1.000]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[bluerosetech.com]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(1.00)[1.000]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(1.00)[1.000]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:36236, ipnet:208.111.40.0/24, country:US]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N I'm porting a PHP application that uses composer[1] to download and manage what effectively becomes locally-bundled contrib. Doing this during the build process isn't an option because it creates a nightmare of licensing and version management. Also, composer needs internet access and can be configured to do other things, like code compliance and unit tests. Can I run something like composer from the post-install target? Is it reasonable to assume internet access is available during port/pkg install? 1: https://getcomposer.org/ From nobody Wed Nov 10 18:27:58 2021 X-Original-To: ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D19F18550F1 for ; Wed, 10 Nov 2021 18:28:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from delphij@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yb1-xb30.google.com (mail-yb1-xb30.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b30]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1D4" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HqCyt6Wgtz4nj2; Wed, 10 Nov 2021 18:28:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from delphij@gmail.com) Received: by mail-yb1-xb30.google.com with SMTP id a129so8670468yba.10; Wed, 10 Nov 2021 10:28:22 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=HxHTsGG/BMhBSiT082zW2Nh4Ugvf+F0yDFOussLWq9Q=; b=V5cg8XqshwNM6kEjpc9Wk71X/6XhzGl3rzOyZhDmrrl2EhgXJptzogdCkLfQz9hC+Q axFAqAOPMX4X4BcBHp//G6aRKc6ky238vpyUigtTv6hTrKW37Ni5t94Mwrl8xn9cqzp2 wVOU8WL2ivFnDJgHcROj1uyihUXq4R34m6LBtb7LIHEWRhJ2275G2G/xguwDHaSloTJJ nrW7g+FoiHN4PK7vGvymsWy8miMgrTs9WgtdkH5Dg0tVMneYLWiCfVZusk4P0YSqq0WS 3S+EN9JcXsAekG9t7l+p0mUTtznYD81Iwi0dy3fQvMYkDuBculSF5KL4sSHKZ5DEoDc0 AZQA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=HxHTsGG/BMhBSiT082zW2Nh4Ugvf+F0yDFOussLWq9Q=; b=qzaDp8CcK7w0if3+0teNcXtJVS+HQqOPHyoVFKZvfBWpMxWlp6uZhqpiI/qyi+2l1Z nyWhlMhQAxFdHZ9eHDBIaN2TwO1nIE1Am8L6PNv2L4XlbnNI+mlsZAPG8xPwhcrtU5WV rkikgki5sLFzu+R8ArHYQbdTxvCuC9S2Btewb8M9Ip9UQ9m0BURTHGH3mnS/f2NQFj5N zSDquZIJ2HRzTZfFNwaUddu4JJ+3eh78+ZTRRzRc46G9iyY2a0UwgKazNQS2TP9LicCd fnJnWpAQ8jprQbyhqWUBtolBq5IOSg9qJ2WmzGEEcOZJIRpD/jf8kvhfYRRArBtvgjJE W/ug== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533H/koucm23UMQOZ7PKJhBByH5MKM/iBpNqrM+2t2b3iB3QR66B BhjWpA5hOrf8oG/erdZXkFSXdOW/Pz3lJ/DuQjoQ+M1xquc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwfHR7oKMr5DUYG3hhSW5z29qv7SKeDXMbN0QLCcwajPJZA9fCAJ2TqBCKq0es3vzb0DDqj3CAGX6da2UBRJzM= X-Received: by 2002:a25:f502:: with SMTP id a2mr1475140ybe.254.1636568889311; Wed, 10 Nov 2021 10:28:09 -0800 (PST) List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <6F18C72A-D3FF-4135-9E7B-24D423F8489F@FreeBSD.org> <11853a40-85dc-e562-8883-1f1d3a7a7d20@delphij.net> In-Reply-To: From: Xin LI Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2021 10:27:58 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: cyrus-sasl dependency in bsd.ldap.mk To: Juraj Lutter , Mathieu Arnold , yuri@freebsd.org Cc: ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000004c506a05d07363b5" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4HqCyt6Wgtz4nj2 X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=V5cg8Xqs; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of delphij@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::b30 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=delphij@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.96 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20210112]; FREEFALL_USER(0.00)[delphij]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.96)[-0.962]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROMTLD(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::b30:from]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com:dkim] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: Y --0000000000004c506a05d07363b5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable +Mathieu Arnold and Yuri, please see the discussion below. On Mon, Nov 8, 2021 at 9:28 AM Juraj Lutter wrote: > > > > On 8 Nov 2021, at 18:17, Xin Li wrote: > > > > On 11/8/21 05:39, Juraj Lutter wrote: > >> Hi Delphij, > >> you seem to be the most active in bsd.ldap.mk :-) > >> I=E2=80=99ve found that since openldap-client also depends on cyrus-sa= sl > unconditionally, bsd.ldap.mk requires this: > >> otis@b13:/usr/ports/Mk % git diff -- bsd.ldap.mk > >> diff --git a/Mk/bsd.ldap.mk b/Mk/bsd.ldap.mk > >> index a6f37dd99b10..7acbc9c660bb 100644 > >> --- a/Mk/bsd.ldap.mk > >> +++ b/Mk/bsd.ldap.mk > >> @@ -77,6 +77,7 @@ IGNORE=3D cannot install: doesn't work > with OpenLDAP version: ${OPENLDAP_VER} (Do > >> . endfor > >> .endif # IGNORE_WITH_OPENLDAP > >> LIB_DEPENDS+=3D > ${OPENLDAP${OPENLDAP_VER}_LIB}:net/openldap${OPENLDAP_VER}-client > >> +LIB_DEPENDS+=3D libsasl2.so:security/cyrus-sasl2 > >> .else > >> IGNORE=3D cannot install: unknown OpenLDAP version: > ${OPENLDAP_VER} > >> .endif # Check for correct libs > >> What are you thought about it? > > > > Could you provide an example that shows the breakage or elaborate more > about why libsasl2.so needs to be listed as a direct library dependency f= or > ports that depends on OpenLDAP? It's already listed as LIB_DEPENDS in > openldap*-{server,client} and installing the library should automatically > bring in cyrus-sasl as needed, no? > > In fact, I was only looking for a solution to silence this: > > =3D=3D=3D=3D> Running Q/A tests (stage-qa) > Error: /usr/local/lib/postfix/postfix-ldap.so is linked to > /usr/local/lib/libsasl2.so.3 from security/cyrus-sasl2 but it is not > declared as a dependency > Warning: you need LIB_DEPENDS+=3Dlibsasl2.so:security/cyrus-sasl2 > > And even when LDAP is being pulled in via LIB_DEPENDS in bsd.ldap.mk, > there is no explicit dependency on cyrus-sasl2. > > What would be the better approach? Given that bsd.ldap.mk is not the > right place. > It looks like this was requested in bug 195203 and implemented here . I wonder if it's possible to only check for DT_NEEDED libraries instead of all of these libraries? E.g. if an executable or shared library is depending on library A and library A depends on library B, library B should only be considered as a true dependency iff the executable/library is calling symbols in library B directly. --0000000000004c506a05d07363b5-- From nobody Fri Nov 12 09:02:39 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A63BE18550EC for ; Fri, 12 Nov 2021 09:02:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [96.47.72.83]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HrCKD4JW5z4XgL; Fri, 12 Nov 2021 09:02:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: from aniel.nours.eu (nours.eu [IPv6:2001:41d0:8:3a4d::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: bapt) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 60D2CEFDC; Fri, 12 Nov 2021 09:02:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: by aniel.nours.eu (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 32719863A1; Fri, 12 Nov 2021 10:02:39 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2021 10:02:39 +0100 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: Guido Falsi Cc: Luca Pizzamiglio , Mel Pilgrim , FreeBSD Ports mailing list Subject: Re: What to do with the "Created by" header comments? Message-ID: <20211112090239.a2j3z7rgx6rwfbho@aniel.nours.eu> References: <3876a4d9-caab-3adf-0ec9-092cd6ef3b0c@bluerosetech.com> List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Spam: Yes X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N On Tue, Nov 09, 2021 at 04:48:53PM +0100, Guido Falsi wrote: > On 09/11/21 16:33, Luca Pizzamiglio wrote: > > Hi Mel, > > > > IIRC the "# Created by: ..." line was added to give credits to the original > > creator of the port. > > I'm not sure if this is still a thing. > > > > As far as I remember (please correct me if I'm wrong) it's deprecated and > should not be added to newly created ports, also because the information is > easy to find in the repo history. > > I don't think there is any rule for existing ones, I personally leave them > there unless requested to do anything different. You are right, its usage has been deprecated because it was giving credit to one person the creator but not to all the people who may have worked on the port, and sometime, other have worked more on it than the initial creator. It was decided to stop adding the "# Created by" line on new port, but there was a push back in removing that line entirely from the existing port. I personnally think we should revisit and remove the # Created by line entirely because it is clearly an unfair credit, and the VCS history has the full credit already in its logs. Baptiste From nobody Fri Nov 12 09:21:40 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0264185D70B for ; Fri, 12 Nov 2021 09:22:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yasu@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::24b:4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HrClk3d6gz4dpb; Fri, 12 Nov 2021 09:22:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yasu@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (gate.home.utahime.org [183.180.29.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: yasu/mail) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0E203F4B5; Fri, 12 Nov 2021 09:22:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yasu@FreeBSD.org) Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2021 18:21:40 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20211112.182140.1107076648848801616.yasu@FreeBSD.org> To: bapt@FreeBSD.org Cc: madpilot@FreeBSD.org, pizzamig@freebsd.org, list_freebsd@bluerosetech.com, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What to do with the "Created by" header comments? From: Yasuhiro Kimura In-Reply-To: <20211112090239.a2j3z7rgx6rwfbho@aniel.nours.eu> References: <20211112090239.a2j3z7rgx6rwfbho@aniel.nours.eu> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.8 on Emacs 29.0.50 List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam: Yes X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N From: Baptiste Daroussin Subject: Re: What to do with the "Created by" header comments? Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2021 10:02:39 +0100 > I personnally think we should revisit and remove the # Created by line entirely > because it is clearly an unfair credit, and the VCS history has the full credit > already in its logs. +1 In addition to unfair credit issue, it often brings contributors into confusion when they submit new port as is shown with this thread. --- Yasuhiro Kimura From nobody Sun Nov 14 14:34:04 2021 X-Original-To: ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90BF218593CC for ; Sun, 14 Nov 2021 14:34:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HsZZh3lWGz3krx for ; Sun, 14 Nov 2021 14:34:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (portscout.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 620B427D44 for ; Sun, 14 Nov 2021 14:34:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.nyi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.10]) by portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 1AEEY4vu051527 for ; Sun, 14 Nov 2021 14:34:04 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 1AEEY4kn051526; Sun, 14 Nov 2021 14:34:04 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <202111141434.1AEEY4kn051526@portscout.nyi.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.nyi.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2021 14:34:04 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ net/remotebox | 2.7 | 3.0 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Reported by: portscout! From nobody Sun Nov 14 15:26:23 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DFF31844411 for ; Sun, 14 Nov 2021 15:26:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@ohreally.nl) Received: from rambler.ohreally.nl (rambler.ohreally.nl [51.15.8.63]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Hsbkk2zp2z4W0x for ; Sun, 14 Nov 2021 15:26:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@ohreally.nl) Received: from authenticated-user by rambler.ohreally.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 122A91D77A90 for ; Sun, 14 Nov 2021 16:26:04 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ohreally.nl; s=dkim; t=1636903565; r=y; bh=SNLiqI11HoGCDeMXgkLLGQh2vUB8QrVChbwWuZOqOLU=; h=Date:To:From:Subject; b=r4cV4sk5B0Wti38pg7kmym4PBvSFCh9ltB3WOXeYNuYWlALQf7x7VzCiT596H7fKR kj/OJvECmhCoIv7ZTppJanM3UPRBUAsyBnr5lofrUUVzogP/ehQ9zSmQXD2ssHwmDP eu07PYZBWbacOmQdt7VD7/pGN+p5PJf0lQbqqVDY= Message-ID: <4ca51765-b556-3f12-5809-5aadbf6dccca@ohreally.nl> Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2021 16:26:23 +0100 List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Content-Language: en-US From: Rob LA LAU Subject: Adding functionality to a port Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.104.0 at rambler.ohreally.nl X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Hsbkk2zp2z4W0x X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=ohreally.nl header.s=dkim header.b=r4cV4sk5; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of freebsd@ohreally.nl designates 51.15.8.63 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=freebsd@ohreally.nl X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.01 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[ohreally.nl:s=dkim]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx:c]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.55)[0.548]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[ohreally.nl]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.96)[0.964]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[ohreally.nl:+]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:12876, ipnet:51.15.0.0/17, country:FR]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N Hello list, I'm wondering what the rules/guidelines are for adding functionality to a port, that is not in the upstream package. I can't find anything about this in the porters' documentation. Background: I'm not a porter myself (planning to be one, but that's irrelevant for my current question). I ran into a buggy `periodic' script. And when looking for the port maintainer to report the bug, I found that this script is not part of the upstream package, but was added to the port by the port maintainer. So I'm wondering now whether I should report the bug in the `periodic' script, or ask the maintainer to remove the script from the port (and maybe submit it as a separate port). And in more general it would be interesting to know when changes made to a port are considered too drastic, and when port maintainers should be asked to join the upstream development team instead of (or in addition to) maintaining the port. Thanks for any and all replies. Cheers, Rob -- https://www.librobert.net/ https://www.ohreally.nl/category/nerd-stuff/ From nobody Sun Nov 14 15:34:42 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BF6F18481AA for ; Sun, 14 Nov 2021 15:34:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@freebsd.org) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Hsbws2C5Tz4YtH for ; Sun, 14 Nov 2021 15:34:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@freebsd.org) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.94.2 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1mmHWk-000HOR-U1; Sun, 14 Nov 2021 16:34:42 +0100 Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2021 16:34:42 +0100 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Rob LA LAU Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Adding functionality to a port Message-ID: References: <4ca51765-b556-3f12-5809-5aadbf6dccca@ohreally.nl> List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4ca51765-b556-3f12-5809-5aadbf6dccca@ohreally.nl> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Hsbws2C5Tz4YtH X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N Hello, > I'm wondering what the rules/guidelines are for adding functionality to a > port, that is not in the upstream package. I can't find anything about > this in the porters' documentation. > > Background: > I'm not a porter myself (planning to be one, but that's irrelevant for my > current question). > I ran into a buggy `periodic' script. And when looking for the port > maintainer to report the bug, I found that this script is not part of the > upstream package, but was added to the port by the port maintainer. > So I'm wondering now whether I should report the bug in the `periodic' > script, or ask the maintainer to remove the script from the port (and > maybe submit it as a separate port). Please submit a problem report via bugs.freebsd.org for the port in question. If you provide a patch for the periodic script upstream, that would probably be fine as well, if they accept it. The maintainer can decide what should happen to the buggy script... > And in more general it would be interesting to know when changes made to > a port are considered too drastic, and when port maintainers should be > asked to join the upstream development team instead of (or in addition > to) maintaining the port. You can ask the maintainer if he wants to join upstream, but if there's no interest, there's no need to pressure one into upstream 8-) -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 Now what ? From nobody Sun Nov 14 15:40:11 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD019184C0DD for ; Sun, 14 Nov 2021 15:40:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ronald-lists@klop.ws) Received: from smarthost1.greenhost.nl (smarthost1.greenhost.nl [195.190.28.88]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Hsc3G4tPNz4btH for ; Sun, 14 Nov 2021 15:40:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ronald-lists@klop.ws) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=klop.ws; s=mail; h=In-Reply-To:Message-ID:From:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version: Date:References:Subject:To:Content-Type:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=Ho+F2kHPemoIh2c1IpnKEAfjM00nF/Xv7idwVGZk8Ug=; b=AYCazF0XpPWswv0ng+O3m7AO7n 11F/8DOGr5lTwYzqJllDrXL+uOHwRQT2QXVyr9/pvFv8FVb5FK2RLJOfjNRpyfXpc8FzSizCAA3ud YJtsDElPuzQOXAiwYEjtD5iHFCNb0VEiLTCw1CKfZ99NA1Bf6i6piRJNzDYAzfEwOBCM=; Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15; format=flowed; delsp=yes To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, "Rob LA LAU" Subject: Re: Adding functionality to a port References: <4ca51765-b556-3f12-5809-5aadbf6dccca@ohreally.nl> Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2021 16:40:11 +0100 List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <4ca51765-b556-3f12-5809-5aadbf6dccca@ohreally.nl> User-Agent: Opera Mail/1.0 (Win32) X-Authenticated-As-Hash: bdb49c4ff80bd276e321aade33e76e02752072e2 X-Virus-Scanned: by clamav at smarthost1.greenhost.nl X-Spam-Level: / X-Spam-Score: -0.4 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_50,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF autolearn=disabled version=3.4.2 X-Scan-Signature: e462de357cb394d64966911c06262bc8 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Hsc3G4tPNz4btH X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[] Reply-To: ronald-lists@klop.ws From: Ronald Klop via freebsd-ports X-Original-From: Ronald Klop X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N On Sun, 14 Nov 2021 16:26:23 +0100, Rob LA LAU wrote: > Hello list, > > I'm wondering what the rules/guidelines are for adding functionality to > a port, that is not in the upstream package. I can't find anything about > this in the porters' documentation. > > Background: > I'm not a porter myself (planning to be one, but that's irrelevant for > my current question). > I ran into a buggy `periodic' script. And when looking for the port > maintainer to report the bug, I found that this script is not part of > the upstream package, but was added to the port by the port maintainer. > So I'm wondering now whether I should report the bug in the `periodic' > script, or ask the maintainer to remove the script from the port (and > maybe submit it as a separate port). > > And in more general it would be interesting to know when changes made to > a port are considered too drastic, and when port maintainers should be > asked to join the upstream development team instead of (or in addition > to) maintaining the port. > > Thanks for any and all replies. > > Cheers, > Rob You can file a bug report on https://bugs.freebsd.org/ . If you use a summary like 'www/firefox: Unable to use microphone with ALSA backend' it is automatically assigned to the maintainer of the port. So ': short description of bug'. You can also upload a patch if you have it. If a bug report is not possible you can also just mail the maintainer and see what the reaction is. Regards, Ronald. From nobody Sun Nov 14 15:42:51 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A641184CAA4 for ; Sun, 14 Nov 2021 15:42:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@ohreally.nl) Received: from rambler.ohreally.nl (rambler.ohreally.nl [51.15.8.63]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Hsc5k0DHDz4cg4; Sun, 14 Nov 2021 15:42:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@ohreally.nl) Received: from authenticated-user by rambler.ohreally.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BEE2B1D77A91; Sun, 14 Nov 2021 16:42:32 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ohreally.nl; s=dkim; t=1636904552; r=y; bh=EjO5JxAiW0i8Yn4Elafhf2qwQ5KbYGNnAi+ddUkz7VA=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=ugDRzFacFThWcX6Nt9HhDl97d5j/u50RrN0XF0PykeFpSXUImOfkXQRljncHpKaVf p1n+YDNYJnVSTTRv4eFNXlbW6ZPw7LTDYPiLSaM9pKBR6YHh922zMo4kEWglxERjMy Qp9M7gcQAzoqrTxoR4nUJ0M5VkqwYhQdkmO02hRo= Message-ID: <480b44f5-0674-e645-8413-a1a368cfc393@ohreally.nl> Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2021 16:42:51 +0100 List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Adding functionality to a port Content-Language: en-US To: Kurt Jaeger Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <4ca51765-b556-3f12-5809-5aadbf6dccca@ohreally.nl> From: Rob LA LAU In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.104.0 at rambler.ohreally.nl X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Hsc5k0DHDz4cg4 X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N Hi Kurt, On 14/11/2021 16:34, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > You can ask the maintainer if he wants to join upstream, but > if there's no interest, there's no need to pressure one into upstream 8-) Don't worry: I don't want to pressure anyone into doing anything. :) But I would like to know how much functionality a port maintainer can add to a package before it is considered too much. At some point the port will no longer represent the upstream package, and I'd really like to know where this limit is. Rob -- https://www.librobert.net/ https://www.ohreally.nl/category/nerd-stuff/ From nobody Sun Nov 14 15:54:22 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B467D18535E1 for ; Sun, 14 Nov 2021 15:54:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@freebsd.org) Received: from fc.opsec.eu (fc.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200:4::4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HscMP4nxLz4h4J for ; Sun, 14 Nov 2021 15:54:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@freebsd.org) Received: from pi by fc.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.95 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1mmHpm-00088l-Ae; Sun, 14 Nov 2021 16:54:22 +0100 Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2021 16:54:22 +0100 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Rob LA LAU Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Adding functionality to a port Message-ID: References: <4ca51765-b556-3f12-5809-5aadbf6dccca@ohreally.nl> <480b44f5-0674-e645-8413-a1a368cfc393@ohreally.nl> List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <480b44f5-0674-e645-8413-a1a368cfc393@ohreally.nl> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4HscMP4nxLz4h4J X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N Hi! > On 14/11/2021 16:34, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > > You can ask the maintainer if he wants to join upstream, but > > if there's no interest, there's no need to pressure one into upstream 8-) > > Don't worry: I don't want to pressure anyone into doing anything. :) > > But I would like to know how much functionality a port maintainer can add > to a package before it is considered too much. There's no rule that limits it. Upstream can also hunt for functional changes 8-) and integrate them 8-) > At some point the port will no longer represent the upstream package, and > I'd really like to know where this limit is. There are two aspects: - If the changes are useful, upstream can integrate them... - If the changes collide with upstream ideas, who's to judge, as long as no license issues are created ? Maybe it makes it easier to understand if you tell us the port in question ? -- pi@FreeBSD.org +49 171 3101372 Now what ? From nobody Sun Nov 14 15:56:01 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F39C11853D81 for ; Sun, 14 Nov 2021 15:55:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@ohreally.nl) Received: from rambler.ohreally.nl (rambler.ohreally.nl [51.15.8.63]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HscNw66yLz4hWZ for ; Sun, 14 Nov 2021 15:55:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@ohreally.nl) Received: from authenticated-user by rambler.ohreally.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CD3151D77A90; Sun, 14 Nov 2021 16:55:43 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ohreally.nl; s=dkim; t=1636905344; r=y; bh=GYXTE1LI7It0bv8HSOtUgGR7g39aMzr4pvEgqMC4SGE=; h=Date:Subject:To:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=wr51u7ifVbU819RRDfSEdmwuM25IKW0gMbPdSO9qOQJ6AzFApua8JHT/wcbgcAqkI daAmiHCZQj6oQtisKGjTmMdr2M03/BKQtEL9NTLXAzyTLWcOLFZUq2G1RLOGc4ax4d 5/+atn9/g22lf/lf99nLnlgNQPHjmFcknXIVPcjw= Message-ID: <0730c6f7-ca23-d40f-c395-d20bc1be6816@ohreally.nl> Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2021 16:56:01 +0100 List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Adding functionality to a port Content-Language: en-US To: ronald-lists@klop.ws, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <4ca51765-b556-3f12-5809-5aadbf6dccca@ohreally.nl> From: Rob LA LAU In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.104.0 at rambler.ohreally.nl X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4HscNw66yLz4hWZ X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N Thanks Ronald. But I'm not asking how or where to report bugs. Allow me to rephrase my question. If and when I am a FreeBSD port maintainer, can I just add any scripts or other files to the port I maintain if I think they may be practical, even if those files are not part of the upstream project? Thanks, Rob On 14/11/2021 16:40, Ronald Klop via freebsd-ports wrote: > On Sun, 14 Nov 2021 16:26:23 +0100, Rob LA LAU wrote: > >> Hello list, >> >> I'm wondering what the rules/guidelines are for adding functionality >> to a port, that is not in the upstream package. I can't find anything >> about this in the porters' documentation. >> >> Background: >> I'm not a porter myself (planning to be one, but that's irrelevant for >> my current question). >> I ran into a buggy `periodic' script. And when looking for the port >> maintainer to report the bug, I found that this script is not part of >> the upstream package, but was added to the port by the port maintainer. >> So I'm wondering now whether I should report the bug in the `periodic' >> script, or ask the maintainer to remove the script from the port (and >> maybe submit it as a separate port). >> >> And in more general it would be interesting to know when changes made >> to a port are considered too drastic, and when port maintainers should >> be asked to join the upstream development team instead of (or in >> addition to) maintaining the port. >> >> Thanks for any and all replies. >> >> Cheers, >>    Rob > > > You can file a bug report on https://bugs.freebsd.org/ . If you use a > summary like 'www/firefox: Unable to use microphone with ALSA backend' > it is automatically assigned to the maintainer of the port. So ' portname>: short description of bug'. You can also upload a patch if you > have it. > > If a bug report is not possible you can also just mail the maintainer > and see what the reaction is. > > Regards, > Ronald. > -- https://www.librobert.net/ https://www.ohreally.nl/category/nerd-stuff/ From nobody Sun Nov 14 16:18:36 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8A831849BBF for ; Sun, 14 Nov 2021 16:18:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@ohreally.nl) Received: from rambler.ohreally.nl (rambler.ohreally.nl [51.15.8.63]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Hscv04Jlwz4qMC; Sun, 14 Nov 2021 16:18:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@ohreally.nl) Received: from authenticated-user by rambler.ohreally.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A85E11D77A90; Sun, 14 Nov 2021 17:18:19 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ohreally.nl; s=dkim; t=1636906699; r=y; bh=HcBcOCRzb5RclNJWjQeIpJ0lec1hRuqv6mmBD9Afyxw=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=RRWEjjMJ7uq1ZWF8hsG4ZSBAMAis4zYks6lRat7PLE8XBl15XvrU+95ASU0s8toeG hk42dAFoCsBpcDizNntRVknOF2i+T+pH4EkvzXxKrIdo6GJi87HNNziZOTZOMn2991 mpofffcjQtaQnt4blauONIcZgbSyW+E/F8zMKwYA= Message-ID: <99363924-aa01-013d-6a26-525dfee4513a@ohreally.nl> Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2021 17:18:36 +0100 List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Adding functionality to a port Content-Language: en-US To: Kurt Jaeger Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <4ca51765-b556-3f12-5809-5aadbf6dccca@ohreally.nl> <480b44f5-0674-e645-8413-a1a368cfc393@ohreally.nl> From: Rob LA LAU In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.104.0 at rambler.ohreally.nl X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Hscv04Jlwz4qMC X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N Hi, On 14/11/2021 16:54, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > Maybe it makes it easier to understand if you tell us the port > in question ? It won't actually, because I don't want to focus on this 1 buggy script I found. My question is not about a single bug in a single script. It's about FreeBSD policy, trust, security and reliability. As a port maintainer, can I just modify the functionality of the ports I maintain without any limits? And as a software developer, can I be sure that the package that is installed on FreeBSD systems, and that carries my name and URL, is actually still the package that I developed, with the functionality I intended? And as a sysadmin or user, can I be sure that the port I installed actually does what is advertised on the upstream website? I honestly think that these are very important questions... The internet is no longer this friendly place it was 30 years ago. People with malicious intent have infiltrated software repositories before, and they will keep doing so. Rob -- https://www.librobert.net/ https://www.ohreally.nl/category/nerd-stuff/ From nobody Sun Nov 14 16:23:49 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90C7A184C911 for ; Sun, 14 Nov 2021 16:23:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@freebsd.org) Received: from fc.opsec.eu (fc.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200:4::4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Hsd1M3nQhz4sD3 for ; Sun, 14 Nov 2021 16:23:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@freebsd.org) Received: from pi by fc.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.95 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1mmIIH-0008AI-5m; Sun, 14 Nov 2021 17:23:49 +0100 Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2021 17:23:49 +0100 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Rob LA LAU Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Adding functionality to a port Message-ID: References: <4ca51765-b556-3f12-5809-5aadbf6dccca@ohreally.nl> <480b44f5-0674-e645-8413-a1a368cfc393@ohreally.nl> <99363924-aa01-013d-6a26-525dfee4513a@ohreally.nl> List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <99363924-aa01-013d-6a26-525dfee4513a@ohreally.nl> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Hsd1M3nQhz4sD3 X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N Hi! > As a port maintainer, can I just modify the functionality of the ports I > maintain without any limits? Like modifiying a port that does xyz to actually do the reverse ? No, that would be crazy. Upstream and port users would probably freak out, and rightly so. > And as a software developer, can I be sure that the package that is > installed on FreeBSD systems, and that carries my name and URL, is > actually still the package that I developed, with the functionality I > intended? Non-trivial problem. Read the famous paper on trusting trust: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/358198.358210 > And as a sysadmin or user, can I be sure that the port I installed > actually does what is advertised on the upstream website? See above. > I honestly think that these are very important questions... Yes, but those are unsolvable problems in the framework of a policy. Don't do crazy things is a generic given in most societies I know of 8-) > The internet is no longer this friendly place it was 30 years ago. People > with malicious intent have infiltrated software repositories before, and > they will keep doing so. Yes, sure. So that's why there are reviews etc. And still, bad things happen, and we find out and clean up afterwards. -- pi@FreeBSD.org +49 171 3101372 Now what ? From nobody Sun Nov 14 17:23:22 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8CA51839EF8 for ; Sun, 14 Nov 2021 17:23:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@freebsd.org) Received: from fc.opsec.eu (fc.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200:4::4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HsfL520rbz3k3x for ; Sun, 14 Nov 2021 17:23:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@freebsd.org) Received: from pi by fc.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.95 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1mmJDu-0008Gc-Uh; Sun, 14 Nov 2021 18:23:22 +0100 Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2021 18:23:22 +0100 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Guido Falsi Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Adding functionality to a port Message-ID: References: <4ca51765-b556-3f12-5809-5aadbf6dccca@ohreally.nl> <480b44f5-0674-e645-8413-a1a368cfc393@ohreally.nl> List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4HsfL520rbz3k3x X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.00 / 15.00]; local_wl_from(0.00)[freebsd.org]; ASN(0.00)[asn:12502, ipnet:2001:14f8::/32, country:DE] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N Hi! > It is also not correct to "commandeer" a port to force users on design > choices in conflict with the upstream project. Is there a section in the ports maintainers guide or somewhere else that mandates this ? -- pi@FreeBSD.org +49 171 3101372 Now what ? From nobody Sun Nov 14 18:37:35 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 644DB1866974 for ; Sun, 14 Nov 2021 18:37:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@freebsd.org) Received: from fc.opsec.eu (fc.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200:4::4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Hsgzk2VN5z4btM for ; Sun, 14 Nov 2021 18:37:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@freebsd.org) Received: from pi by fc.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.95 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1mmKNj-0008K0-J6; Sun, 14 Nov 2021 19:37:35 +0100 Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2021 19:37:35 +0100 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Guido Falsi Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Adding functionality to a port Message-ID: References: <4ca51765-b556-3f12-5809-5aadbf6dccca@ohreally.nl> <480b44f5-0674-e645-8413-a1a368cfc393@ohreally.nl> List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Hsgzk2VN5z4btM X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.00 / 15.00]; local_wl_from(0.00)[freebsd.org]; ASN(0.00)[asn:12502, ipnet:2001:14f8::/32, country:DE] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N Hi! > > > It is also not correct to "commandeer" a port to force users on design > > > choices in conflict with the upstream project. > > Is there a section in the ports maintainers guide or somewhere > > else that mandates this ? > Sorry, my fault I did not make me clear maybe, this is all my own opinion. > So is what follows. > > Anyway I don't see it as a good beahviour to take a port of some upstream > software and move it in a contrasting direction than the upstream. I agree. The problem is that this is very difficult to codify into some policy. [...] > The name "ports" implies it is not the place for original development. I > also agree we often have a disconnection on how things are named and what > they actually are or behave, so I would not have any strong reply if you > were to state the the name cannot be held as a reason for policy. So some sort of rule might be: If the functionality varies from the upstream-project in a major way, please use a derived or different name for the port. -- pi@FreeBSD.org +49 171 3101372 Now what ? From nobody Sun Nov 14 18:42:15 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58A4218308AF for ; Sun, 14 Nov 2021 18:42:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from madpilot@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::24b:4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Hsh5519vCz4dB7; Sun, 14 Nov 2021 18:42:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from madpilot@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [172.24.42.21] (host-79-51-17-182.retail.telecomitalia.it [79.51.17.182]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: madpilot/mail) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 97858B98A; Sun, 14 Nov 2021 18:42:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from madpilot@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2021 19:42:15 +0100 List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.3.1 Subject: Re: Adding functionality to a port Content-Language: en-US To: Kurt Jaeger Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <4ca51765-b556-3f12-5809-5aadbf6dccca@ohreally.nl> <480b44f5-0674-e645-8413-a1a368cfc393@ohreally.nl> From: Guido Falsi In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N NOTE replying with my FreeBSD.org address to make the reply reach the mailing list, sorry my previous messages on this thread bounced. On 14/11/21 19:37, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > Hi! > >>>> It is also not correct to "commandeer" a port to force users on design >>>> choices in conflict with the upstream project. > >>> Is there a section in the ports maintainers guide or somewhere >>> else that mandates this ? > >> Sorry, my fault I did not make me clear maybe, this is all my own opinion. >> So is what follows. >> >> Anyway I don't see it as a good beahviour to take a port of some upstream >> software and move it in a contrasting direction than the upstream. > > I agree. The problem is that this is very difficult to codify > into some policy. Very difficult, and I'd really would like to avoid to make the FreeBSD project documents some kind of legal codex. > > [...] >> The name "ports" implies it is not the place for original development. I >> also agree we often have a disconnection on how things are named and what >> they actually are or behave, so I would not have any strong reply if you >> were to state the the name cannot be held as a reason for policy. > > So some sort of rule might be: If the functionality varies from > the upstream-project in a major way, please use a derived or different > name for the port. > As I stated in another (provate message) I just realized that this is at least partly covered by "POLA". IN fact I would very astonished if some port (say firefox for example) started behaving very differently than it does on other OSes for no good technical reason. OTOH a valid technical reason could be dropping some functionality depending on some API not available on FreeBSD, just to make an example from the top of my head. -- Guido Falsi From nobody Sun Nov 14 19:16:50 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D4ED1853E1D for ; Sun, 14 Nov 2021 19:16:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@ohreally.nl) Received: from rambler.ohreally.nl (rambler.ohreally.nl [51.15.8.63]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Hshrh2WX3z4pcx; Sun, 14 Nov 2021 19:16:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@ohreally.nl) Received: from authenticated-user by rambler.ohreally.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CE37F1D77A90; Sun, 14 Nov 2021 20:16:34 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ohreally.nl; s=dkim; t=1636917395; r=y; bh=L7/WFtB30Ab6sjLYOsGZPIOOsXKNeM2vNA3i3UVN9mw=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=G9CurcwVvznVzO96ksVVeSZK8/pY2f/VC4jw6PINS4Wd4iq/657tYzxjQQ9fDj3BG sbPYv1cnj/zY6zFTmExLmL2O3+OqLhyQpqtVvepn4/G5a2Pc8L4S04iCAxwoNi3Ngs +GySuzvTOYv9KgZXqYbfbWNEsD5nKg7+Wjx19IHA= Message-ID: <9f00f43c-0fc6-bcda-1f71-fdaddcad3d0c@ohreally.nl> Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2021 20:16:50 +0100 List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Adding functionality to a port Content-Language: en-US To: Kurt Jaeger , Guido Falsi Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <4ca51765-b556-3f12-5809-5aadbf6dccca@ohreally.nl> <480b44f5-0674-e645-8413-a1a368cfc393@ohreally.nl> From: Rob LA LAU In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.104.0 at rambler.ohreally.nl X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Hshrh2WX3z4pcx X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N Hi again, On 14/11/2021 19:37, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > I agree. The problem is that this is very difficult to codify > into some policy. I've done some digging. And actually, Fedora only needs a few words: "All patches should have an upstream bug link or comment" [1] This assures that packages stay close to their upstream projects. Another rule could be "Patches should only be applied to make the software run as intended by its developer. All additional functionality should be integrated upstream first or, if that's not possible or desirable, should be developed as a separate project which can then be ported alongside the first port." Having rules for these situations means that tools can be created to verify and enforce those rules. Not having these rules is an invitation to people with malicious intent to integrate backdoors, keyloggers, and what not into the ports. IMHO. Rob [1] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_all_patches_should_have_an_upstream_bug_link_or_comment -- https://www.librobert.net/ https://www.ohreally.nl/category/nerd-stuff/ From nobody Sun Nov 14 19:32:52 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08AA8185B872 for ; Sun, 14 Nov 2021 19:32:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@ohreally.nl) Received: from rambler.ohreally.nl (rambler.ohreally.nl [51.15.8.63]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HsjC662n7z3C8d; Sun, 14 Nov 2021 19:32:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@ohreally.nl) Received: from authenticated-user by rambler.ohreally.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C14C31D77A90; Sun, 14 Nov 2021 20:32:33 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ohreally.nl; s=dkim; t=1636918353; r=y; bh=KFGnENpbX5g0glADH/CbiUj5LGC+tMtsNI6OdibbAcQ=; h=Date:Subject:To:References:Cc:From:In-Reply-To; b=BT6eWfbwWn3nVbd1uKsBYyoA3y5WsJYaFs8bbcxzjWWm5WWy3+r9sMs3Vvifipdi8 qRaId+Z/8bV521tc2L6ugimT+6kJ4JJboY+4rj+jwOVWV9/HmQuGG7HsDr7sc+k0Gt Z7I5BAIr4ajqv1RoVBy/4ihAZoEkmeo43I3/G7Bc= Message-ID: Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2021 20:32:52 +0100 List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Adding functionality to a port Content-Language: en-US To: Guido Falsi , Kurt Jaeger References: <4ca51765-b556-3f12-5809-5aadbf6dccca@ohreally.nl> <480b44f5-0674-e645-8413-a1a368cfc393@ohreally.nl> Cc: "freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org" From: Rob LA LAU In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.104.0 at rambler.ohreally.nl X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4HsjC662n7z3C8d X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N And hi again, On 14/11/2021 19:42, Guido Falsi wrote: > IN fact I would very astonished if some port (say firefox for example) started behaving very differently than it does on other OSes for no good technical reason. True. But what if we're not talking about 'behaving very differently'. How about we patch a browser to send the user's passwords to a server we own, while - apart from that - the browser continues to work as expected? > OTOH a valid technical reason could be dropping some functionality depending on some API not available on FreeBSD, just to make an example from the top of my head. Dropping something because it is impossible to implement is different. Sometimes you don't have a choice. My initial question was about a script that was added by the port maintainer, which is not quite the same. Patching software to log keystrokes, or to open a backdoor is also different. Clearly you can't solve all these problems by creating some guidelines and rules. But I don't think that a serious software project can continue without rules. Just like we need passwords and keys. And preferably those rules would be very clear and simple, so that the compliance can be verified (largely) in an automated fashion. Rob -- https://www.librobert.net/ https://www.ohreally.nl/category/nerd-stuff/ From nobody Sun Nov 14 19:43:15 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60529183A5BA for ; Sun, 14 Nov 2021 19:43:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@freebsd.org) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HsjRW2QZzz3H0c for ; Sun, 14 Nov 2021 19:43:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@freebsd.org) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.94.2 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1mmLPH-000HiE-CU; Sun, 14 Nov 2021 20:43:15 +0100 Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2021 20:43:15 +0100 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Rob LA LAU Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Adding functionality to a port Message-ID: References: <4ca51765-b556-3f12-5809-5aadbf6dccca@ohreally.nl> <480b44f5-0674-e645-8413-a1a368cfc393@ohreally.nl> <9f00f43c-0fc6-bcda-1f71-fdaddcad3d0c@ohreally.nl> List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <9f00f43c-0fc6-bcda-1f71-fdaddcad3d0c@ohreally.nl> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4HsjRW2QZzz3H0c X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N Hi! > On 14/11/2021 19:37, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > > I agree. The problem is that this is very difficult to codify > > into some policy. > > I've done some digging. And actually, Fedora only needs a few words: > > "All patches should have an upstream bug link or comment" [1] > > This assures that packages stay close to their upstream projects. As FreeBSD's not Linux, we often have the problem that bugs reported upstream are not accepted, discarded or ignored 8-} But in general, this sounds like a useful rule, if we do not enforce it too rigidly. > Another rule could be > > "Patches should only be applied to make the software run as intended by > its developer. All additional functionality should be integrated upstream > first or, if that's not possible or desirable, should be developed as a > separate project which can then be ported alongside the first port." This would lead to a lot of additional ports, because of above... > Not having these rules is an invitation to people with malicious intent > to integrate backdoors, keyloggers, and what not into the ports. IMHO. In general, patches and modifications are not submitted/committed with malicious intent. And, as far as I understand, open source project do not write rules to protect against the worst possible case/attacker, because that might slow other contributors. The workflow should include checks to protect. If checks against worst-cases can be automated, wonderful. But should the rules really assume the worst from its contributors ? -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 Now what ? From nobody Sun Nov 14 19:49:52 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F2DB183E57C for ; Sun, 14 Nov 2021 19:49:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from madpilot@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [96.47.72.83]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Hsjb61nssz3K1M; Sun, 14 Nov 2021 19:49:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from madpilot@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [172.24.42.21] (host-79-51-17-182.retail.telecomitalia.it [79.51.17.182]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: madpilot/mail) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A72D2B730; Sun, 14 Nov 2021 19:49:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from madpilot@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2021 20:49:52 +0100 List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.3.1 Subject: Re: Adding functionality to a port Content-Language: en-US To: Rob LA LAU , Kurt Jaeger Cc: "freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org" References: <4ca51765-b556-3f12-5809-5aadbf6dccca@ohreally.nl> <480b44f5-0674-e645-8413-a1a368cfc393@ohreally.nl> From: Guido Falsi In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N On 14/11/21 20:32, Rob LA LAU wrote: > And hi again, > > On 14/11/2021 19:42, Guido Falsi wrote: > > IN fact I would very astonished if some port (say firefox for > example) started behaving very differently than it does on other OSes > for no good technical reason. > > True. > But what if we're not talking about 'behaving very differently'. How > about we patch a browser to send the user's passwords to a server we > own, while - apart from that - the browser continues to work as expected? > I'd argue that adding such a behaviour is a significant change in behaviour. Apart from that such a change would be criminal in most jurisdictions too. And I'd add that the juridical system would simply persecute whoever owns the server the information is being sent too. My opinion about allowed changes is also guided by avoiding this kind of risks. > > OTOH a valid technical reason could be dropping some functionality > depending on some API not available on FreeBSD, just to make an example > from the top of my head. > > Dropping something because it is impossible to implement is different. > Sometimes you don't have a choice. Exactly, so an acceptable change. > My initial question was about a script that was added by the port > maintainer, which is not quite the same. Patching software to log > keystrokes, or to open a backdoor is also different. I did not reply directly to your original question because I don't have a final solution. You talk about "adding a periodic script". That is not even a real modification to the upstream software IMHO. Just adding some glue code for FreeBSD. If the script does what it advertises, and has no malicious intent I see nothing wrong with it. If it is broken fixing it is the logical thing to do. Again, this is my personal opinion though. > Clearly you can't solve all these problems by creating some guidelines > and rules. But I don't think that a serious software project can > continue without rules. Just like we need passwords and keys. > > And preferably those rules would be very clear and simple, so that the > compliance can be verified (largely) in an automated fashion. Being a son of two lawyers, and having a lot of friends who are lawyers, and also clients who are law firms, my informed (by having had a lot of arguments with all these people about this very subject) opinion is that there is no such thing in the world as a "clear and simple" set of rules. I think I could simplify this in an aphorism like this: About rules and laws: Simple, clear and useful, you can't have all three, pick two. -- Guido Falsi From nobody Sun Nov 14 20:20:15 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 687D4184E224 for ; Sun, 14 Nov 2021 20:20:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@ohreally.nl) Received: from rambler.ohreally.nl (rambler.ohreally.nl [51.15.8.63]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HskFr1xZ5z3kHg; Sun, 14 Nov 2021 20:20:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@ohreally.nl) Received: from authenticated-user by rambler.ohreally.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3BA3C1D77A90; Sun, 14 Nov 2021 21:19:59 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ohreally.nl; s=dkim; t=1636921199; r=y; bh=NVjGwUoNrCe+SnOvfrRSyBr7jsdLiSFPJOHwyeuw2JM=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=z0GPYIN4ArUpxTXumhGlVjR8vw4b5tvyU8pxqP+EjlEXUK5bArUZcngmxCtMWkz1i x6vL+6ma9MGhYAkWBpc3xRn0hB9A4wXHVvfuaqydEZ60YbKte+RbEdznYvQLFE6Izj Zpt39iPozJILBZwR5b3W9YUCWdIVOM5zo19MmlH8= Message-ID: Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2021 21:20:15 +0100 List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Adding functionality to a port Content-Language: en-US To: Kurt Jaeger Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <4ca51765-b556-3f12-5809-5aadbf6dccca@ohreally.nl> <480b44f5-0674-e645-8413-a1a368cfc393@ohreally.nl> <9f00f43c-0fc6-bcda-1f71-fdaddcad3d0c@ohreally.nl> From: Rob LA LAU In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.104.0 at rambler.ohreally.nl X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4HskFr1xZ5z3kHg X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N Hi, >> "Patches should only be applied to make the software run as intended by >> its developer. All additional functionality should be integrated upstream >> first or, if that's not possible or desirable, should be developed as a >> separate project which can then be ported alongside the first port." > > This would lead to a lot of additional ports, because of above... But since those additional ports would also be closer to their upstream, each individual port would need less patches and be easier to maintain. So even if the ports tree would be larger, it would also be cleaner. > In general, patches and modifications are not submitted/committed > with malicious intent. I'm sure that that is true, But nevertheless, several colleagues have had their repositories compromised, so if this hasn't happened to FreeBSD yet, and FreeBSD doesn't have any measures put in place, it is probably just a matter of time. [1][2][3][4][...] > The workflow should include checks to protect. If checks against > worst-cases can be automated, wonderful. But should the > rules really assume the worst from its contributors ? No, it should assume the best. And be prepared for the worst. Why should you only marry with a prenup? Because it's not in the way if things go well, and it's good to have organized everything beforehand if things do not go well. If the porters really care for FreeBSD, they will understand and agree that it must be protected against people who care a bit less. If their ego cannot take some simple rules that will undoubtedly reduce the risk of the ports tree getting compromised, then maybe they don't care as much for FreeBSD as they say. IMHO, of course. Rob [1] https://www.securityweek.com/arch-linux-aur-repository-compromised [2] https://www.securityweek.com/hackers-plant-malicious-code-gentoo-linux-github-page [3] https://blog.gridinsoft.com/more-than-700-malicious-libraries-detected-in-rubygems-repository/ [4] https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/malicious-pypi-packages-hijack-dev-devices-to-mine-cryptocurrency/ -- https://www.librobert.net/ https://www.ohreally.nl/category/nerd-stuff/ From nobody Sun Nov 14 20:58:38 2021 X-Original-To: ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76BCF1839539 for ; Sun, 14 Nov 2021 20:58:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from george+freebsd@m5p.com) Received: from mailhost.m5p.com (mailhost.m5p.com [74.104.188.4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "m5p.com", Issuer "R3" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Hsl6k54f2z4QmD for ; Sun, 14 Nov 2021 20:58:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from george+freebsd@m5p.com) Received: from [IPV6:2001:470:1f07:15ff::26] (court.m5p.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:15ff:0:0:0:26]) (authenticated bits=0) by mailhost.m5p.com (8.16.1/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id 1AEKwcDO099823 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 14 Nov 2021 15:58:44 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from george+freebsd@m5p.com) Message-ID: <34fd4a6a-87a7-b1a5-385b-5c1dab767560@m5p.com> Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2021 15:58:38 -0500 List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.2.0 Subject: Re: Adding functionality to a port Content-Language: en-US To: ports@freebsd.org References: <4ca51765-b556-3f12-5809-5aadbf6dccca@ohreally.nl> <480b44f5-0674-e645-8413-a1a368cfc393@ohreally.nl> From: George Mitchell In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=10.0 tests=HELO_MISC_IP,HELO_NO_DOMAIN, NICE_REPLY_A autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.5 (2021-03-20) on mattapan.m5p.com X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Hsl6k54f2z4QmD X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of george@m5p.com designates 74.104.188.4 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=george@m5p.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.01 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+a]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[ports@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.92)[0.924]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[m5p.com]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.39)[0.386]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:701, ipnet:74.104.0.0/16, country:US]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[freebsd]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N On 11/14/21 13:42, Guido Falsi wrote: > [...] > As I stated in another (provate message) I just realized that this is at > least partly covered by "POLA". [...] Perhaps I'm naïve, but to me the Principle of Least Amazement really does completely cover the issues being raised here. Is it necessary to complicate the situation any more than that? -- George From nobody Sun Nov 14 21:39:39 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3A45185B2D5 for ; Sun, 14 Nov 2021 21:39:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from SRS0=Yejt=QB=quip.cz=000.fbsd@elsa.codelab.cz) Received: from elsa.codelab.cz (elsa.codelab.cz [94.124.105.4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Hsm1x5gv4z4mFm for ; Sun, 14 Nov 2021 21:39:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from SRS0=Yejt=QB=quip.cz=000.fbsd@elsa.codelab.cz) Received: from elsa.codelab.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by elsa.codelab.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id D500F28417; Sun, 14 Nov 2021 22:39:41 +0100 (CET) Received: from illbsd.quip.test (ip-78-45-215-131.net.upcbroadband.cz [78.45.215.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by elsa.codelab.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8EAA128411; Sun, 14 Nov 2021 22:39:40 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: Adding functionality to a port To: Rob LA LAU , ronald-lists@klop.ws, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <4ca51765-b556-3f12-5809-5aadbf6dccca@ohreally.nl> <0730c6f7-ca23-d40f-c395-d20bc1be6816@ohreally.nl> From: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> Message-ID: <1b4e941d-841a-fa14-799e-d0655d5a82ec@quip.cz> Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2021 22:39:39 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <0730c6f7-ca23-d40f-c395-d20bc1be6816@ohreally.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Hsm1x5gv4z4mFm X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N On 14/11/2021 16:56, Rob LA LAU wrote: > Thanks Ronald. But I'm not asking how or where to report bugs. > > Allow me to rephrase my question. > > If and when I am a FreeBSD port maintainer, can I just add any scripts > or other files to the port I maintain if I think they may be practical, > even if those files are not part of the upstream project? If you want simple answer, then YES. Almost all SW in ports are developed without FreeBSD in mind and does not contain FreeBSD compatible rc script to start the service so the maintainer needs to write some. And periodic scripts are again very FreeBSD specific, not included in the upstream. Both (rc and periodic) scripts are in maintainer's hands. Some ports without these additional scripts will be almost useless. But if you are asking if maintainer can add any malicious code then the answer is NO and port committers are doing their best to not commit it. Miroslav Lachman From nobody Sun Nov 14 21:50:36 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48327185F80D for ; Sun, 14 Nov 2021 21:50:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dave@horsfall.org) Received: from nsstlmta19p.bpe.bigpond.com (nsstlmta19p.bpe.bigpond.com [203.38.21.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "", Issuer "Openwave Messaging Inc." (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HsmGc3rxpz4pyq for ; Sun, 14 Nov 2021 21:50:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dave@horsfall.org) Received: from smtp.telstra.com ([10.10.24.4]) by nsstlfep19p-svc.bpe.nexus.telstra.com.au with ESMTP id <20211114215037.BKAF6690.nsstlfep19p-svc.bpe.nexus.telstra.com.au@smtp.telstra.com> for ; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 08:50:37 +1100 X-RG-Spam: Unknown X-RazorGate-Vade: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvuddrvdejgdduheefucetufdoteggodetrfdotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuuffpveftpgfvgffnuffvtfetpdfqfgfvnecuuegrihhlohhuthemucegtddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenucfjughrpeffhffvufgjkfhffgggtgesmhdttdertderjeenucfhrhhomhepffgrvhgvucfjohhrshhfrghllhcuoegurghvvgeshhhorhhsfhgrlhhlrdhorhhgqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpefhieefgeejheejtdetvdekkeekfeffheektdeggfegjefgueegfeelleeggeeiudenucffohhmrghinhepfihikhhiphgvughirgdrohhrghenucfkphepuddutddrudeguddrudelfedrvdeffeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhephhgvlhhopegrnhgvuhhrihhnrdhhohhrshhfrghllhdrohhrghdpihhnvghtpeduuddtrddugedurdduleefrddvfeefpdhmrghilhhfrhhomhepuggrvhgvsehhohhrshhfrghllhdrohhrghdprhgtphhtthhopehfrhgvvggsshguqdhpohhrthhssehfrhgvvggsshgurdhorhhg X-RazorGate-Vade-Verdict: clean 0 X-RazorGate-Vade-Classification: clean X-RG-VS-CLASS: clean Received: from aneurin.horsfall.org (110.141.193.233) by smtp.telstra.com (5.8.716.02) id 611C6CEC120CE494 for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 08:50:37 +1100 Received: from aneurin.horsfall.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by aneurin.horsfall.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 1AELoaBb030459 for ; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 08:50:36 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from dave@horsfall.org) Received: from localhost (dave@localhost) by aneurin.horsfall.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) with ESMTP id 1AELoagq030456 for ; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 08:50:36 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from dave@horsfall.org) X-Authentication-Warning: aneurin.horsfall.org: dave owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2021 08:50:36 +1100 (EST) From: Dave Horsfall To: FreeBSD Ports Subject: Re: Adding functionality to a port In-Reply-To: <34fd4a6a-87a7-b1a5-385b-5c1dab767560@m5p.com> Message-ID: References: <4ca51765-b556-3f12-5809-5aadbf6dccca@ohreally.nl> <480b44f5-0674-e645-8413-a1a368cfc393@ohreally.nl> <34fd4a6a-87a7-b1a5-385b-5c1dab767560@m5p.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21.9999 (BSF 287 2018-06-16) X-GPG-Public-Key: http://www.horsfall.org/gpgkey.pub X-GPG-Fingerprint: 05B4 FFBC 0218 B438 66E0 587B EF46 7357 EF5E F58B X-Home-Page: http://www.horsfall.org/ X-Witty-Saying: "chmod 666 the_mode_of_the_beast" List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="1483753691-51442078-1636926636=:6467" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4HsmGc3rxpz4pyq X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --1483753691-51442078-1636926636=:6467 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT On Sun, 14 Nov 2021, George Mitchell wrote: > Perhaps I'm naïve, but to me the Principle of Least Amazement really > does completely cover the issues being raised here. Is it necessary to > complicate the situation any more than that? -- George First time I've heard POLA called that; I knew it as "... astonishment" some decades ago (by Dr. John Lions; for all I know he could've coined it). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principle_of_least_astonishment -- Dave --1483753691-51442078-1636926636=:6467-- From nobody Sun Nov 14 22:59:48 2021 X-Original-To: ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 025D9186044E for ; Sun, 14 Nov 2021 22:59:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from george+freebsd@m5p.com) Received: from mailhost.m5p.com (mailhost.m5p.com [74.104.188.4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "m5p.com", Issuer "R3" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HsnpN1TWtz3kL5 for ; Sun, 14 Nov 2021 22:59:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from george+freebsd@m5p.com) Received: from [IPV6:2001:470:1f07:15ff::26] (court.m5p.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:15ff:0:0:0:26]) (authenticated bits=0) by mailhost.m5p.com (8.16.1/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id 1AEMxmoW000295 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 14 Nov 2021 17:59:54 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from george+freebsd@m5p.com) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2021 17:59:48 -0500 List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.2.0 Subject: Re: Adding functionality to a port Content-Language: en-US To: ports@freebsd.org References: <4ca51765-b556-3f12-5809-5aadbf6dccca@ohreally.nl> <480b44f5-0674-e645-8413-a1a368cfc393@ohreally.nl> <34fd4a6a-87a7-b1a5-385b-5c1dab767560@m5p.com> From: George Mitchell In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=10.0 tests=HELO_MISC_IP,HELO_NO_DOMAIN, NICE_REPLY_A autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.5 (2021-03-20) on mattapan.m5p.com X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4HsnpN1TWtz3kL5 X-Spamd-Bar: + Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of george@m5p.com designates 74.104.188.4 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=george@m5p.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [1.77 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+a:c]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[ports@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.92)[0.922]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[m5p.com]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(1.00)[1.000]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.15)[0.147]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:701, ipnet:74.104.0.0/16, country:US]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[freebsd]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N On 11/14/21 16:50, Dave Horsfall wrote: > [...] > First time I've heard POLA called that; I knew it as "... astonishment" > some decades ago (by Dr. John Lions; for all I know he could've coined it). > [...] So I'm a decrepit old codger and my memory is going ... -- George