From nobody Mon Nov 15 01:57:23 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D8BB184CC6C for ; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 01:57:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marklmi@yahoo.com) Received: from sonic315-55.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (sonic315-55.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com [98.137.65.31]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HsslN2pn4z586F for ; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 01:57:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marklmi@yahoo.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1636941449; bh=DT4M08usTEA/B8HZeygPrbB+zZhk9zXY/60cYo/6Zuk=; h=From:Subject:Date:To:References:From:Subject:Reply-To; b=aQOjd9UhZj+MzQGodhAYluggO9d8cqpMImGqXW0Lz4+8LQVpdCtJ0G7QLQsRDi/ZbsVQc2xRn9hJvI4XyJe9Zy1V0nYmkSr3sqaBSA1e+sF7iOTe12cOOTmL643z/lh3+LCE6nupo+atfSzABnrYxtLZ4FOWKRLWQisubcFOyifkn93ruHrZK2CreKa6RUBsfZSD5RXnbNUtUv6+LZ2TI0HPD4g5QZn5T6suLLvqIQXxao7rX+FWNbiyWzFV7B4MG1j3MHqmi9I2+A+s367evxQLoVOPycy4RKEFG2k0IP6OLVeiYIAVjeGvU0d2UqBLwvRbJ7lG41bpag3hD3RL0A== X-SONIC-DKIM-SIGN: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1636941449; bh=+E/EfFUOdfZ87ZSAEzhKZoC8dv3qSXgPxEQjpZ+BT6O=; h=X-Sonic-MF:From:Subject:Date:To:From:Subject; b=AWjdea7j3fvmeQTTqJn67Pj6h+5E0HUwZoZGUqL02hMj6LrQm0NRppKp1vmzo/vWvay4iffxOKqM6SCQFzTKEFIosoSc1tc5VN1RcR3dnw9b6Ktieks9fyqyefiLSbMw03Cu8YiTkP9kS9lpqfSp5NcK9zgHBNH4yQ3LW3XoQxcyRTjXjX52qr/wtUqhN5NaYBovduMsGunk4n+ENvuAVdFHclWnemR3VvccOK4Z5i1rCeRVrk9c6KBXdBYsQ5jP7olr860OTlBFEzLuMO5BNBvi+xXUx9hM2lNSJfd+Uo9Lsm/i/HFc0kiYfhBYp/ptUEmjEIQIuWNJxnPO14WriQ== X-YMail-OSG: u5IA.8kVM1mgPJkQxcrlmPkoqPDMSP1myVEODuk6su75INK6R5ijs_C2xC71Wue ZbflIt8V7Wl3ZyzISgBht1MsVpsUUopFJR9OO38FBU9jhKO.deD2DSCVzx6OSkrhj.4CMcvcFmaQ fyfJvEApI769o9QU.ZcNocN3cQKC.iShU7KTq5okEhsJEDarud_m.N.LT2zpzkmN7c84q6MdGaIK AqhG5VLgQmg6WdM9Vl4Io2salX_P5y7lZW4JzGC7yMZdTa7nbMJfng.xW_kRahJjwI6Daz4deiJa .q5yKnlZBgztI9EW6tKGmQL9bOoCtrTdh8rxi12sM.1ARfA0LxE7.QkL9zEnX7pUaJV0dWwsozv. j7baMfNM5iRRA.yVA_O7emBtmNgb_HcFk5LqWjK1VRvsOEgEmOQvvWzpKgSBUeXzAC2JoJYN6YO1 LoRaVL3WWBxYPDPFbNHWGFvhvzZS3Wf1DMTCJD8Kgct.ynF0WtdtzzZ_L3vC.2sAgndfgUf7I7YL LNkQIRiShcdKImyu3j3YASg9rf.HyDVk6iTZtRT0aW_84Mqh7cym1jGA0wirxhFudOoKagu.CPlv KFk2xTN_RLEEOiCjLNlTxc_clsecZrC.iEn70IoMw4EotNVjthX74GEuYsDAvisNBYTgJvdxkA0i LEUYhkahR1CTPRQB.pJjhW0aKKkiBqI6x3kN5GSwjH9TFs_D1w810HBZIlbSzfOTd8viUVhuTSYU iYwH0dLfqwNOix3Xnbf7018HsyS8mDFO7LKJHT7IJ5sp9_wG11Qz_Qh9AYejkU7bTVzdUzRixO4y ZQ09etMQDpxbViV9i5F2DRbpxA73H.FUoTlZ4k4_Rbo7c1FBrUl3Xa8jAI.1EFg7EsSN6oh7OIEg V6PI5Eg9PtohTLZtWI6Ln1lGko1iNwhDEir1uoVqBEtg.6xPtufI4XXau7585SSUZJP8sfbJA_wF wIwMkGHsVRO4dJDQjhf4OtgCir6CRkr2Vbppghsg5c2mwS9vMCnzAMzPot5K26kHjHy6I70wzIZF ro7OUBbBMsXyMyZiQDPDY674xa7TQ9etDsoILBlo5BHYkW4BYZu1tot2MHi8.rSS8jcdjIcJ3V5I dYRipjXni9hGcXme_yromVs21Jll5NxKMUWE3rJ9okwsuYuvUME8NrhrtowNVElBIohs9.qAf02A 092rg2E0B4UhrNJtODBR0AHitwPos0CQB2tty.rHx1mXiFwHfNwhXQdTsde0a0hXxul1o6ZWroF7 L64lS7wbhg5OAmbn94EiSsMH.SzJt70rYWUOcG7Pzp3wVKEASEtNmp2kO6Lf1E0nSDYygeHD8XOX dkxgscuGw4nPA6RVAyoMsa58Hq11jEPYLqR94DWHJwPoa_hEifLctqQczVr83bclCLujhhc9iyiN 2arOjS7j37oQobHaHOz6axB5tBQpI8w0bcmyUJKsdI2bUCSGU3mD0xNPG5fEIntKdBFIa8_h1Q6m 8inetEtRuOT3a6IgoEk1wBNVh96FZym4iZ7llBdHZcuPPLabIMz2ZeviFYVPXiX6Punmcq96bAO1 9KuBJbc.YLh9cMrIG10jS7xx5s_iz22.Jj53WmPuyjb.ZG5TsLHkkeFyGoRfraUmO6rwAcspYE5A oTRimH4s6nFSDW1HcPSfaCMXOyjoE6SnF_FSrlbmDm4NP2snrVFBziT9l5izHE0B2JuB2DcnUZii kSHWztYf_SCEl8Bnkerlc_z55eNOGV1BUaLV6J.4kD5tS2QToaCmnqJ1Lsvh4zlY2_q3tR0UGp6B P.dI5M7_mER1MDJjM_MPkjMfDiuDDye5a5S8JTXhGRhesct5pDUttEliL69IhkQ7FjLtgwxJo6HO jige_9IZEDPVJa5ZDXqomKQipuXM4jaCaF0fTo5jIeByoc_LesalC58OvwVS94mvhbv4n4SW86kO xji7Qzjz_rdohGKoHroYk1WKAdMbVfokT2Q3.pJUp97TXlS7I1bI2APdFOFLBkoFWrt5EFJg1TIh TEsz5SB.Ag5.1AjFUWH9EWlC1X8q0srgvXM22OHQbSx54jS5qvB9nUXwztfRyKDwn6Lk2EYok0BR flbqPZbUG54wymeGpRQV9mtKM_IXp1s3YzSF3AR5f1gyy8N3ipD_mNY21wI79OCJPQkVtQhtpP5c Vy1mw8zQJ31L6JkdU3nZd7kljA3M_JFlIOg5hvv5yYSy1R4D1xrLwqXWeWvDJUAdUnr1sotmiqRy LNHwNqcJfrPHowtDlmvXw_DR2kDxk5YmFgKOw5yazzuife9OM3XHUvpvzOnh_XFohobELzU9ozYq J1Hx5VIZOykA0l8qrK4MHDgE4Bwbc1gbsmA46D.c- X-Sonic-MF: Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic315.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with HTTP; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 01:57:29 +0000 Received: by kubenode538.mail-prod1.omega.gq1.yahoo.com (VZM Hermes SMTP Server) with ESMTPA ID b0e3868ec0a0eae78e9191fa07892cc5; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 01:57:24 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.120.0.1.13\)) Subject: automake config failure for autoconf test failure (poudriere based build activity) Message-Id: <9CAF2D2A-6C52-4584-AA63-C42B7921BF43@yahoo.com> Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2021 17:57:23 -0800 To: "tijl@freebsd.org" , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.120.0.1.13) References: <9CAF2D2A-6C52-4584-AA63-C42B7921BF43.ref@yahoo.com> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4HsslN2pn4z586F X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=yahoo.com header.s=s2048 header.b=aQOjd9Uh; dmarc=pass (policy=reject) header.from=yahoo.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of marklmi@yahoo.com designates 98.137.65.31 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=marklmi@yahoo.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.50 / 15.00]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_SOME(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[yahoo.com:s=s2048]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[98.137.65.31:from]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[yahoo.com]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ptr:yahoo.com]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(1.00)[1.000]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[yahoo.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[98.137.65.31:from]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[yahoo.com,reject]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[yahoo.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:36647, ipnet:98.137.64.0/20, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[yahoo.com:dkim] Reply-To: marklmi@yahoo.com From: Mark Millard via freebsd-ports X-Original-From: Mark Millard X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N poudriere output: [00:24:23] [09] [00:01:20] Saved devel/automake | automake-1.16.4 wrkdir = to: = /usr/local/poudriere/data/wrkdirs/13_0R-CA72-default/default/automake-1.16= .4.tbz [00:24:23] [09] [00:01:20] Finished devel/automake | automake-1.16.4: = Failed: configure . . . logs/errors/automake-1.16.4.log : . . . checking whether autoconf is installed... yes checking whether autoconf works... no configure: error: The installed version of autoconf does not work. Please check config.log for error messages before this one. =3D=3D=3D> Script "configure" failed unexpectedly. Please report the problem to tijl@FreeBSD.org [maintainer] and attach = the "/wrkdirs/usr/ports/devel/automake/work/automake-1.16.4/config.log" = including the output of the failure of your make command. Also, it might be a good = idea to provide an overview of all packages installed on your system (e.g. a /usr/local/sbin/pkg-static info -g -Ea). *** Error code 1 Stop. make: stopped in /usr/ports/devel/automake =3D>> Cleaning up wrkdir =3D=3D=3D> Cleaning for automake-1.16.4 build of devel/automake | automake-1.16.4 ended at Sun Nov 14 17:01:21 = PST 2021 build time: 00:01:09 !!! build failure encountered !!! work/automake-1.16.4/config.log : . . . configure:3650: checking whether autoconf is installed configure:3656: autoconf --version autoconf (GNU Autoconf) 2.69 Copyright (C) 2012 Free Software Foundation, Inc. License GPLv3+/Autoconf: GNU GPL version 3 or later , = This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it. There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law. Written by David J. MacKenzie and Akim Demaille. configure:3659: $? =3D 0 configure:3667: result: yes configure:3674: checking whether autoconf works configure:3684: cd conftest && autoconf -o /dev/null conftest.ac gm4:/usr/local/share/autoconf-2.69/autoconf/autoconf.m4f:1: expecting = character `V' in frozen file autom4te-2.69: /usr/local/bin/gm4 failed with exit status: 1 configure:3687: $? =3D 1 configure:3696: result: no configure:3700: error: The installed version of autoconf does not work. Please check config.log for error messages before this one. . . . For reference: # uname -apKU FreeBSD CA72_16Gp_ZFS 14.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 14.0-CURRENT #19 = main-n250667-20aa359773be-dirty: Sun Nov 14 02:57:32 PST 2021 = root@CA72_16Gp_ZFS:/usr/obj/BUILDs/main-CA72-nodbg-clang/usr/main-src/arm6= 4.aarch64/sys/GENERIC-NODBG-CA72 arm64 aarch64 1400042 1400042 # cd /usr/ports/ # ~/fbsd-based-on-what-commit.sh=20 branch: main merge-base: 057c0c3c0645c0b237bb2a96dda440e0426ca983 merge-base: CommitDate: 2021-11-14 23:41:22 +0000 057c0c3c0645 (HEAD -> main, freebsd/main, freebsd/HEAD) [NEW] = security/snowflake-tor: Pluggable Transport using WebRTC inspired by = Flashproxy n566061 (--first-parent --count for merge-base) Note(s): My amd64 FreeBSD context using the same sources (by content) did not have this problem. =3D=3D=3D Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away in early 2018-Mar) From nobody Mon Nov 15 08:42:16 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A4FF185B7BC for ; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 08:42:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@ohreally.nl) Received: from rambler.ohreally.nl (rambler.ohreally.nl [51.15.8.63]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Ht2k20Wqcz3C7C; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 08:42:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@ohreally.nl) Received: from authenticated-user by rambler.ohreally.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 04EE11D77A90; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 09:41:59 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ohreally.nl; s=dkim; t=1636965720; r=y; bh=R95i46oSoK0w08Ez+T+wvzO1PJaw8xCVEGrHK9W18vc=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=e1D90jdj9X7FCfNhOxYgK3+e2nzT5tY60lCkMrDwe6hhZhGK1yGx8Vf7lxF/X4lPh p40VZ6arF3Lxf35oegjmWetH+wYOjp6bF0v60q02rVyQBWnS9FqOMEjkrtsFlOUw2R 2lEVCvdGsEPfmO5S/H/EJv1bYjcq8tWgjG3g/22s= Message-ID: <455ffbd8-2406-7c75-718c-759da5bab52c@ohreally.nl> Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2021 09:42:16 +0100 List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Adding functionality to a port Content-Language: en-US To: Guido Falsi , Kurt Jaeger Cc: "freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org" References: <4ca51765-b556-3f12-5809-5aadbf6dccca@ohreally.nl> <480b44f5-0674-e645-8413-a1a368cfc393@ohreally.nl> From: Rob LA LAU In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.104.0 at rambler.ohreally.nl X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Ht2k20Wqcz3C7C X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N Hi, On 14/11/2021 20:49, Guido Falsi wrote: > You talk about "adding a periodic script". That is not even a real > modification to the upstream software IMHO. Just adding some glue code > for FreeBSD. If the script does what it advertises, and has no malicious > intent I see nothing wrong with it. If it is broken fixing it is the > logical thing to do. Imagine a daemon, an rc script and a periodic script. And imagine that we decided to separate all 3 into separate ports. When fitting these ports into the ports tree, we would make the daemon depend on the rc script, because the daemon needs the rc script to start and stop (and starting and stopping could be considered core functionality). But we would make the periodic script depend on the daemon, because the daemon runs fine without the periodic script, but the periodic script is useless without the daemon. To me this would mean that the daemon and the rc script should be published together as a single port, making the rc script an acceptable FreeBSD-specific addition. (Which does not mean that the addition should not be reported to upstream; the goal should also be to have the rc script included in the upstream project, just like the systemd unit that is already included.) The periodic script, however, should be considered new functionality, and published in a separate port. And to contradict the above, one could now plead that external libraries that the daemon depends on should also be packaged together with the daemon, but the difference obviously is that no other package will ever depend on the daemon's rc script, while those libraries have been created to allow multiple applications to use them. And there will always be exceptions. Things are not always black and white, and they shouldn't be. And obviously, I'm the outsider here. I'm not trying to tell anyone what to do and how to do it. I'm just making sure that this subject has not been overlooked. > Being a son of two lawyers, and having a lot of friends who are lawyers, > and also clients who are law firms, my informed (by having had a lot of > arguments with all these people about this very subject) opinion is that > there is no such thing in the world as a "clear and simple" set of rules. Nobody is trying to write a legal document here. The goal is just to assure that the ports in the ports collection still function as intended by the upstream developers, preferably with no functionality removed, and definitely with no functionality added. Rob -- https://www.librobert.net/ https://www.ohreally.nl/category/nerd-stuff/ https://github.com/ohreally/ From nobody Mon Nov 15 09:21:46 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8EAD1854673 for ; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 09:21:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from madpilot@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [96.47.72.83]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Ht3bw6CbKz3PnL; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 09:21:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from madpilot@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [172.24.42.13] (host-79-51-17-182.retail.telecomitalia.it [79.51.17.182]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: madpilot/mail) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 518CC22C80; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 09:21:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from madpilot@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <0415769b-ac3d-86d0-54c4-1f0a74db0b13@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2021 10:21:46 +0100 List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.3.1 Subject: Re: Adding functionality to a port Content-Language: en-US To: Rob LA LAU , Kurt Jaeger Cc: "freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org" References: <4ca51765-b556-3f12-5809-5aadbf6dccca@ohreally.nl> <480b44f5-0674-e645-8413-a1a368cfc393@ohreally.nl> <455ffbd8-2406-7c75-718c-759da5bab52c@ohreally.nl> From: Guido Falsi In-Reply-To: <455ffbd8-2406-7c75-718c-759da5bab52c@ohreally.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N On 15/11/21 09:42, Rob LA LAU wrote: > Hi, > > On 14/11/2021 20:49, Guido Falsi wrote: >> You talk about "adding a periodic script". That is not even a real >> modification to the upstream software IMHO. Just adding some glue code >> for FreeBSD. If the script does what it advertises, and has no >> malicious intent I see nothing wrong with it. If it is broken fixing >> it is the logical thing to do. > > Imagine a daemon, an rc script and a periodic script. > And imagine that we decided to separate all 3 into separate ports. > When fitting these ports into the ports tree, we would make the daemon > depend on the rc script, because the daemon needs the rc script to start > and stop (and starting and stopping could be considered core > functionality). > But we would make the periodic script depend on the daemon, because the > daemon runs fine without the periodic script, but the periodic script is > useless without the daemon. > To me this would mean that the daemon and the rc script should be > published together as a single port, making the rc script an acceptable > FreeBSD-specific addition. (Which does not mean that the addition should > not be reported to upstream; the goal should also be to have the rc > script included in the upstream project, just like the systemd unit that > is already included.) > The periodic script, however, should be considered new functionality, > and published in a separate port. > > And to contradict the above, one could now plead that external libraries > that the daemon depends on should also be packaged together with the > daemon, but the difference obviously is that no other package will ever > depend on the daemon's rc script, while those libraries have been > created to allow multiple applications to use them. > > And there will always be exceptions. Things are not always black and > white, and they shouldn't be. > > And obviously, I'm the outsider here. I'm not trying to tell anyone what > to do and how to do it. I'm just making sure that this subject has not > been overlooked. > I don't follow you. The example is too abstract for any useful purpose. You intentionally mix the concept of "depending on" with the concept of "packaging together". Even following your example all the practices you describe could be acceptable and at the same time debatable. The variety of software is too broad to create a strict rule set. Such matters need to be handled on a case by case basis anyway We do have some principles to guide us, which have been stated to you. One of these is classic POLA, for example. This gives us an idea. You have to consider how the original software is packaged upstream and usually packaged for other OSes. Considerable differences from the rest of the world best practices would be "astonishing". Also you have to consider upstream documentation. If that suggests doing things in a certain way and the port did things in a different way that would be astonishing too. In the end you also seem to forget or intentionally ignore that FreeBSD is also a community of developers and users. You do things the best you think, but it can happen that users or other developer will tell you you are wrong, maybe suggesting better solutions. Ideally this is done in a polite and constructive way; unluckily it sometimes gets aggressive and unpleasant, and this is definitely something we should avoid. You can then modify your work and make it better based on this feedback., No technical choice is set in stone. >> Being a son of two lawyers, and having a lot of friends who are >> lawyers, and also clients who are law firms, my informed (by having >> had a lot of arguments with all these people about this very subject) >> opinion is that there is no such thing in the world as a "clear and >> simple" set of rules. > > Nobody is trying to write a legal document here. > The goal is just to assure that the ports in the ports collection still > function as intended by the upstream developers, preferably with no > functionality removed, and definitely with no functionality added. You look too worried by the "functionality added" part. If the added functionality is only a script needed for integration with the system it's not added, but something strictly needed by the porting effort. For example I maintain some ports (asterisk, ntopng) which are run as daemons. Upstream does provide startup scripts for linux, but none for FreeBSD. The ports contain startup script I made because they are needed for proper usage of the port. (and some bugs have happened in those scripts, I have fixed those to the best of my ability) Users are not force to use the startup script I (or upstream for that matter) provides. They are disabled by default. Nothing stops the users from writing their own rc scripts, or using a different method of starting them (cron @reboot or something like supervisor for example). Those scripts are "added" but not mandatory for anyone, they don't detract anything from the upstream software. I don't know which port periodic script you are talking about, but I guess it's not enabled by default, and in the unfortunate case the maintainer went out of his way to make it such, it should be possible to disable it, and then you can script your own or use something else for that part of the port. This for startup and rc scripts...other more convoluted cases require case by case analysis. A more general reply is impossible. -- Guido Falsi From nobody Mon Nov 15 11:01:57 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F020188B14D for ; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 11:02:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from SRS0=cjAb=QC=klop.ws=ronald-lists@realworks.nl) Received: from smtp-relay-int.realworks.nl (smtp-relay-int.realworks.nl [194.109.157.24]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Ht5qd6B3Zz4fmG for ; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 11:02:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from SRS0=cjAb=QC=klop.ws=ronald-lists@realworks.nl) Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2021 12:01:57 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=klop.ws; s=rw1; t=1636974117; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=O1yOcS3S8mUQvV50TeP5CSY2RLV+QWL5V+uOGPqhS/Q=; b=whI1sG3qCExXkg9AaZBZr+PTz16Mmr2l5usfkhUTNyuNl+/U/Abe7eVTSQ9BfqCR6b8t2H NH5B8eqs52/QssAQ== To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <1027702627.3.1636974117639@mailrelay> In-Reply-To: <0730c6f7-ca23-d40f-c395-d20bc1be6816@ohreally.nl> References: <4ca51765-b556-3f12-5809-5aadbf6dccca@ohreally.nl> <0730c6f7-ca23-d40f-c395-d20bc1be6816@ohreally.nl> Subject: Re: Adding functionality to a port List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_2_194974015.1636974117624" X-Mailer: Realworks (585.1296.bdcec4b) Importance: Normal X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Ht5qd6B3Zz4fmG X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=klop.ws header.s=rw1 header.b=whI1sG3q; dmarc=pass (policy=quarantine) header.from=klop.ws; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of "SRS0=cjAb=QC=klop.ws=ronald-lists@realworks.nl" designates 194.109.157.24 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="SRS0=cjAb=QC=klop.ws=ronald-lists@realworks.nl" X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.20 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[klop.ws:s=rw1]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:194.109.157.0/24]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(1.00)[1.000]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[klop.ws:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[klop.ws,quarantine]; HAS_X_PRIO_THREE(0.00)[3]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[ronald-lists@klop.ws,SRS0=cjAb=QC=klop.ws=ronald-lists@realworks.nl]; RCVD_COUNT_ZERO(0.00)[0]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[194.109.157.24:from]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:3265, ipnet:194.109.0.0/16, country:NL]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[ronald-lists@klop.ws,SRS0=cjAb=QC=klop.ws=ronald-lists@realworks.nl] Reply-To: ronald-lists@klop.ws From: Ronald Klop via freebsd-ports X-Original-From: Ronald Klop X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: Y ------=_Part_2_194974015.1636974117624 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Van: Rob LA LAU Datum: zondag, 14 november 2021 16:56 Aan: ronald-lists@klop.ws, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Onderwerp: Re: Adding functionality to a port > > Thanks Ronald. But I'm not asking how or where to report bugs. > > Allow me to rephrase my question. > > If and when I am a FreeBSD port maintainer, can I just add any scripts or other files to the port I maintain if I think they may be practical, even if those files are not part of the upstream project? > Yes you can. But: 1. As a (starting) maintainer you can't commit the changes yourself. A committer will check and commit your changes. 2. All additions are open and verifiable. It is hard to sneak something into it. And even more to do that anonymously. There are probably some more checks and balances to this process. It has proven itself pretty solid. Regards, Ronald. > Thanks, > Rob > > > On 14/11/2021 16:40, Ronald Klop via freebsd-ports wrote: > > On Sun, 14 Nov 2021 16:26:23 +0100, Rob LA LAU wrote: > > > >> Hello list, > >> > >> I'm wondering what the rules/guidelines are for adding functionality >> to a port, that is not in the upstream package. I can't find anything >> about this in the porters' documentation. > >> > >> Background: > >> I'm not a porter myself (planning to be one, but that's irrelevant for >> my current question). > >> I ran into a buggy `periodic' script. And when looking for the port >> maintainer to report the bug, I found that this script is not part of >> the upstream package, but was added to the port by the port maintainer. > >> So I'm wondering now whether I should report the bug in the `periodic' >> script, or ask the maintainer to remove the script from the port (and >> maybe submit it as a separate port). > >> > >> And in more general it would be interesting to know when changes made >> to a port are considered too drastic, and when port maintainers should >> be asked to join the upstream development team instead of (or in >> addition to) maintaining the port. > >> > >> Thanks for any and all replies. > >> > >> Cheers, > >> Rob > > > > > > You can file a bug report on https://bugs.freebsd.org/ . If you use a > summary like 'www/firefox: Unable to use microphone with ALSA backend' > it is automatically assigned to the maintainer of the port. So ' portname>: short description of bug'. You can also upload a patch if you > have it. > > > > If a bug report is not possible you can also just mail the maintainer > and see what the reaction is. > > > > Regards, > > Ronald. > > > > -- > > https://www.librobert.net/ > https://www.ohreally.nl/category/nerd-stuff/ > ------=_Part_2_194974015.1636974117624-- From nobody Mon Nov 15 11:15:39 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 906611891561 for ; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 11:15:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from madpilot@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [96.47.72.83]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Ht67K3V6kz4kWr; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 11:15:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from madpilot@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [172.24.42.13] (host-79-51-17-182.retail.telecomitalia.it [79.51.17.182]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: madpilot/mail) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 002B32399B; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 11:15:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from madpilot@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2021 12:15:39 +0100 List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.3.1 Subject: Re: Adding functionality to a port Content-Language: en-US To: ronald-lists@klop.ws, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <4ca51765-b556-3f12-5809-5aadbf6dccca@ohreally.nl> <0730c6f7-ca23-d40f-c395-d20bc1be6816@ohreally.nl> <1027702627.3.1636974117639@mailrelay> From: Guido Falsi In-Reply-To: <1027702627.3.1636974117639@mailrelay> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N On 15/11/21 12:01, Ronald Klop via freebsd-ports wrote: > > Van: Rob LA LAU > Datum: zondag, 14 november 2021 16:56 > Aan: ronald-lists@klop.ws, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org > Onderwerp: Re: Adding functionality to a port >> >> Thanks Ronald. But I'm not asking how or where to report bugs. >> >> Allow me to rephrase my question. >> >> If and when I am a FreeBSD port maintainer, can I just add any scripts >> or other files to the port I maintain if I think they may be >> practical, even if those files are not part of the upstream project? >> > > > Yes you can. But: > > 1. As a (starting) maintainer you can't commit the changes yourself. A > committer will check and commit your changes. > 2. All additions are open and verifiable. It is hard to sneak something > into it. And even more to do that anonymously. > > There are probably some more checks and balances to this process. It has > proven itself pretty solid. This all implies: 3) there is no shield from community verification, getting criticized in the mailing lists or bugs reports, and having to change your mind about your assumptions, revert things, discuss alternative solutions, etc. Hopefully this happens in a civil and constructive manner, but sadly sometimes things become "unpleasant" (please anyone avoid being the one bringing unpleasantness) -- Guido Falsi From nobody Mon Nov 15 14:38:34 2021 X-Original-To: ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60343188C6B9 for ; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 14:38:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HtBdR0TWdz4ltW for ; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 14:38:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (portscout.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E627A1B553 for ; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 14:38:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.nyi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.10]) by portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 1AFEcYga092290 for ; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 14:38:34 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 1AFEcYaF092289; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 14:38:34 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <202111151438.1AFEcYaF092289@portscout.nyi.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.nyi.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2021 14:38:34 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ finance/moneymanagerex | 1.2.7 | v1.5.9 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Reported by: portscout! From nobody Mon Nov 15 18:14:39 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9F271892CAC for ; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 18:14:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marklmi@yahoo.com) Received: from sonic301-22.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (sonic301-22.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com [98.137.64.148]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HtHR21d1tz3hN6 for ; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 18:14:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marklmi@yahoo.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1637000085; bh=C2icfc7aKDYXON8YieUnvcy1faVtAkd3BnU16MgSNdc=; h=From:Subject:Date:Cc:To:References:From:Subject:Reply-To; b=hmxW6lXTw5hb97MiTGhTXc1UdA+NE1ykFIPjmZei+qDKVl8b9w/CB7dVnedG9ZRpz4kvURi8SRbKRTmUQAwSYz/0ZuH/cVko2HgQaTKh+RselMbC2woiYq7lAvKVppCgK6Hyg0bjJ45EF2dki5ho0dDCed+Et3WCswCIMUOvyrAt4bE7RDWoAnS0XAjEFLMrNEoyR34sBqqR6pL+Uh37DtVucqzCY9dwobVWnQohjerxHPy7Dx86OiEpdt9DKS7PWk7+VkFIxA5UBEQ1edNYY2nrHMg8tidjGDU/LVnj0lVGk8CRhA9OKEtBQBv/qGkJkqw9xyjJbI0mt8klL7OyGg== X-SONIC-DKIM-SIGN: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1637000085; bh=X/Mik6OZMLbwG2czLS2/itDJjd0cFP6JanHnZ42Da0e=; h=X-Sonic-MF:From:Subject:Date:To:From:Subject; b=QdUed6W5gGfVPoI51C14DB8v2MStpvevd2wYW0gz6iUV/61F2/VRbpNAVaBvC9qeJwJU/5LTyoOe+QnIuj2woC/XNgG+T56GtneSp03hT47XE9l0o0X2rJx3j2LoF2SpXt2IM4VGe3sl5wh1WWa7IHxsKV26N9O2kJ8L6mgMmGy0ohwzT/xyK+v+ndj0viSChHV21zJ5WW/JGiykSKqrD5bPvHfD9y4VrEjtuLlfX/5/D3UlVYg1mNSZLCOl+qKkJUQ9uY+MzrEtPOfKDPFs/dnqgKqlK6ykO1Nw3SH+PFWxQDw8tKyHfQ2r9oylM+tYQ6adkmHxY7xB9MG8rZ2t7A== X-YMail-OSG: UytF20kVM1nhbx4zyo8Xyll7v8xTjffuhLe._1z2rEHfWWebjGHzkaehMrrDpvf MDfgD1N4w7_iadJyCvIYZ37ZnDlWcS7ofC0eZxRZ2eUGz6D9D00sDE1300M0ly4_KTjmRWfODWhr 8wTcO0BLOqB7cXFm7WHossMq9DLJ6XTvun3rgCj85DjOJJpwhC0OU8iUB6PglS2v5GbZAJlxd6Ki T9ghuBJ6MHHqCITq9L3xkho1uuAMV0pgUzTe8zPrf0mjrUFiZcIvH6xdRZ6lKxMHF6Btui.kH27C DIJdhNKTaerb6YvWJqQKY0Osjkrd4opCVFrro_rTet.Eag4W_eNNGPguVA1j6xktd30WLWB1bovG gAY_nD8iF_IZgfFDIkuVrkqxBHA5kbAGR517HkO3PxXUopAa0PNYeuP.CYeNa5QC5Bj12spDSXeN O3ldDqWXiE.hIriKW6U5f5RHAHc6D8JuZBqrnqF4CXsSKWmeBiNYjz.AzxOMAoGTFD.Chc_vE7cq HUmO__nQFya41XiiZkarKegCrjISkQ755TDzeiwOIx0Fph6kH6W9EtX4W8IGIDRYZhpLhCiKa1EK pmzEMiTMnQUdj1eFlA_7QMyxMYZBZ5Kle3zr4ss_mfEIoVIDYUNmydBQZjNsKS1q_2Cg4LgqKPtn X5BvQFXY7tnkXOjnuWloAbBfRhPEA1WVEU9b0EnMcbT93wLy684EnWENxUDrdcrHYe42rrVBzbaZ zblBvLOyvrw_lJP5wzKM9xdni4_3pI5cr8787JXyddlY7VikfYz07mu85hh4ViF9_gR5Hc.i3NlL 1sc6jDp5oJ6yTPS06WzwH_zqacBYEgQxivfWokvscNTMKHMVNCQ487exM7VcLtKqtW5Xr30SEh9i wMWdupMpo20brLqgcfgYkIdvP7bJsjMLf7N5OkYE6.f3FuvhioGH5MHHWosXrWSxJmTanU5tshlH zj.1LIEQ377qwP1LuVKNu2xZsW3qFxYH6FkOrh8Dtia07ftCd6f9r6FxnNaXwX22ThRceFebF21p P9xLMTk7mLtkJHB_tiy.Ghmcgl8UGZdg9GBVPOnNBdvr72PZpRvhG_iyIcD8UD96RyYgs87dE8L9 QlAR6MdMx7fCd.4jIOzbXqJmHgpwbvZCDyoFiv1J0DfskdEFhZzuFT3YMs9br0D1kZLgLxDYkzx0 A.X6p1ZVlZTa9dJxzIKhhQueWot.JZ.OzG6UFdAxJm.ijMjx5_xTJb26oQyya4DFGslK5eZ1MDOr sl_zZq3iDHYpccZlsddTU_XGJEOUI1Jk9BoA5U0f17RWksgtvyjo.mmMmzZiGGk.ux.kdNhbBtXk z_rP40IGWqoYybzLOytdMyZPLGpoD0n8F4fKLbGWvSuExg.GbRboKmw4xIT1xVbrbTQWKIXu_n6W T5xSHOZaet8vYpMePAJ8D6esFs_xMGx83syeXktEHWYu0gu7HZ8K2HGG7cHorwRuZFVAjnAQTm5g UgE9sjAJ2EmbvHd6btCFtl6fQVCXXPxYZaLFWqNhRsNwkMXmeJ3KvqP7BGHxNZ1cGpNYMndNsu.k 09YNuotkmkUtPiBw2VFQ6_BKL9VybWS88OXkOfR.kU7gIS4FFh7hiacusmT.gRf7Jz584u4WqNL8 .H5iqDIYoq0bco4rUnDvM2MoMaARYbyxglfIyFBq0.YhgCJd9gL5Nb8VOvqIV7sVTtqNP92btkBV JwwUYFNA.gVr_uOMfT3mVxDFzKZs35rDwjArDRBjleeHgJT1NIaZK581xYuwcFN5pw_fx3cGW5pJ sFJg0zWkG2dqvbCZ8T2d6mpmNpc0t3EbElqJeRGfPtjD63kSn4wc4IACneq8tGRhYfR4Ko4bMc3O XfW_TystsFSYPyuvK3OMgSMBmw6SDgrX0LIYn93JVXNtldAbiB8XwFBWQ1IelX7A4TtM2Il23RtN cR6Ml2rLqznFB0.lMyJYCOSgs0vzgBN44uge1MNX5qj8OAe7DsF1WRmaxfYacL2SD1RoBltAkDf6 urjPw5OAzfWE9nn5ka2_TszIX6ubFrFDIfeleLr3fer3WZTP04RSIDRjbIqRCtYqajhHJQcqdUWm 5_9x7dWA.A_De_nKMnHlFCzkaURw0Yi7domYHyzPKvdTYzTqhJ_kPVnhVLMFU1la20r9Gm2AG7mL nUCmJfeTyCQTai4UEPIdtQ11RdE3BeBm8gOIDEtNQMqKYp4JDHlC9rFiUNk1AkZmyHjApi6fhvU7 DRD7WkylsHFx_qMbYvZYcGZtEIIcMogN7nGrgwRivM0H.vt.v X-Sonic-MF: Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic301.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with HTTP; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 18:14:45 +0000 Received: by kubenode520.mail-prod1.omega.bf1.yahoo.com (VZM Hermes SMTP Server) with ESMTPA ID 0202f115a5e78cbabb0b738dbf0e9075; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 18:14:42 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.120.0.1.13\)) Subject: armv7 targeting (on aarch64, via poudriere-devel): system's clang 13 rejected building devel/lllvm13 Message-Id: <15A74B79-47CF-4743-A831-D7C0E9B1DD0E@yahoo.com> Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2021 10:14:39 -0800 Cc: "freebsd-arm@freebsd.org" To: "brooks@freebsd.org" , FreeBSD Toolchain , freebsd-current , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.120.0.1.13) References: <15A74B79-47CF-4743-A831-D7C0E9B1DD0E.ref@yahoo.com> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4HtHR21d1tz3hN6 X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=yahoo.com header.s=s2048 header.b=hmxW6lXT; dmarc=pass (policy=reject) header.from=yahoo.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of marklmi@yahoo.com designates 98.137.64.148 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=marklmi@yahoo.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.46 / 15.00]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[yahoo.com]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ptr:yahoo.com]; RCPT_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[yahoo.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[yahoo.com,reject]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.96)[-0.965]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[yahoo.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:36647, ipnet:98.137.64.0/20, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[yahoo.com:dkim]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[yahoo.com:s=s2048]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[98.137.64.148:from]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[98.137.64.148:from]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] Reply-To: marklmi@yahoo.com From: Mark Millard via arm X-Original-From: Mark Millard X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N There error was: error: non-constant-expression cannot be narrowed from type 'long long' = to 'std::size_t' (aka 'unsi gned int') in initializer list [-Wc++11-narrowing] std::size_t resultBytes{size * elementBytes}; ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ = /wrkdirs/usr/ports/devel/llvm13/work/llvm-project-13.0.0.src/flang/runtime= /misc-intrinsic.cpp:50:27: note: insert an explicit cast to silence this = issue std::size_t resultBytes{size * elementBytes}; ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ static_cast( ) More context: =3D=3D=3D> Compilation failed unexpectedly. Try to set MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE=3Dyes and rebuild before reporting the = failure to the maintainer. /usr/bin/c++ -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=3D64 -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE = -D__STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS -D__STDC_FORMAT_MACROS -D__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS = -I/wrkdirs/usr/ports/devel/llvm13/work/.build/tools/flang/runtime = -I/wrkdi rs/usr/ports/devel/llvm13/work/llvm-project-13.0.0.src/flang/runtime = -I/wrkdirs/usr/ports/devel/llvm13/work/llvm-project-13.0.0.src/flang/inclu= de -I/wrkdirs/usr/ports/devel/llvm13/work/.build/tools/fl ang/include -I/wrkdirs/usr/ports/devel/llvm13/work/.build/include = -I/wrkdirs/usr/ports/devel/llvm13/work/llvm-project-13.0.0.src/llvm/includ= e -isystem /wrkdirs/usr/ports/devel/llvm13/work/llvm-project -13.0.0.src/llvm/../mlir/include -isystem = /wrkdirs/usr/ports/devel/llvm13/work/.build/tools/mlir/include -isystem = /wrkdirs/usr/ports/devel/llvm13/work/.build/tools/clang/include -isystem = /wrkdirs/usr/ ports/devel/llvm13/work/llvm-project-13.0.0.src/llvm/../clang/include = -O2 -pipe -mcpu=3Dcortex-a7 -DNDEBUG -fstack-protector-strong -isystem = /usr/local/include -fno-strict-aliasing -mcpu=3Dcortex-a7 -DND EBUG -isystem /usr/local/include -fPIC -fvisibility-inlines-hidden = -Werror=3Ddate-time -Werror=3Dunguarded-availability-new -Wall -Wextra = -Wno-unused-parameter -Wwrite-strings -Wcast-qual -Wmissing-field- initializers -pedantic -Wno-long-long -Wc++98-compat-extra-semi = -Wimplicit-fallthrough -Wcovered-switch-default -Wno-noexcept-type = -Wnon-virtual-dtor -Wdelete-non-virtual-dtor -Wsuggest-override -Wstr ing-conversion -Wmisleading-indentation -fdiagnostics-color = -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -Wno-deprecated-copy = -Wno-string-conversion -Wno-unused-command-line-argument = -Wstring-conversion =20 -Wcovered-switch-default -Wno-nested-anon-types -O2 -pipe = -mcpu=3Dcortex-a7 -DNDEBUG -fstack-protector-strong -isystem = /usr/local/include -fno-strict-aliasing -mcpu=3Dcortex-a7 -DNDEBUG = -isystem /usr /local/include -std=3Dc++17 -fno-exceptions -MD -MT = tools/flang/runtime/CMakeFiles/obj.FortranRuntime.dir/misc-intrinsic.cpp.o= -MF = tools/flang/runtime/CMakeFiles/obj.FortranRuntime.dir/misc-intrinsic.c pp.o.d -o = tools/flang/runtime/CMakeFiles/obj.FortranRuntime.dir/misc-intrinsic.cpp.o= -c = /wrkdirs/usr/ports/devel/llvm13/work/llvm-project-13.0.0.src/flang/runtime= /misc-intrinsic.cpp = /wrkdirs/usr/ports/devel/llvm13/work/llvm-project-13.0.0.src/flang/runtime= /misc-intrinsic.cpp:50:27: error: non-constant-expression cannot be = narrowed from type 'long long' to 'std::size_t' (aka 'unsi gned int') in initializer list [-Wc++11-narrowing] std::size_t resultBytes{size * elementBytes}; ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ = /wrkdirs/usr/ports/devel/llvm13/work/llvm-project-13.0.0.src/flang/runtime= /misc-intrinsic.cpp:50:27: note: insert an explicit cast to silence this = issue std::size_t resultBytes{size * elementBytes}; ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ static_cast( ) 1 error generated. =3D=3D=3D Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away in early 2018-Mar) From nobody Mon Nov 15 18:40:58 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 065551850EF3; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 18:41:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [96.47.72.83]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HtJ1F6dG8z3vPC; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 18:41:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from tensor.andric.com (tensor.andric.com [87.251.56.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "tensor.andric.com", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) (Authenticated sender: dim) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A724C270E2; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 18:41:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtpclient.apple (longrow.home.andric.com [192.168.0.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tensor.andric.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BECB05A022; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 19:41:03 +0100 (CET) From: Dimitry Andric Message-Id: <91AD337B-6D40-4639-A43C-688699981167@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_73807854-0A8A-41CA-A301-8309F9FC216B"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.120.0.1.13\)) Subject: Re: armv7 targeting (on aarch64, via poudriere-devel): system's clang 13 rejected building devel/lllvm13 Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2021 19:40:58 +0100 In-Reply-To: <15A74B79-47CF-4743-A831-D7C0E9B1DD0E@yahoo.com> Cc: "brooks@freebsd.org" , FreeBSD Toolchain , freebsd-current , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, "freebsd-arm@freebsd.org" To: Mark Millard References: <15A74B79-47CF-4743-A831-D7C0E9B1DD0E.ref@yahoo.com> <15A74B79-47CF-4743-A831-D7C0E9B1DD0E@yahoo.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.120.0.1.13) X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N --Apple-Mail=_73807854-0A8A-41CA-A301-8309F9FC216B Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On 15 Nov 2021, at 19:14, Mark Millard via arm wrote: >=20 > There error was: >=20 > error: non-constant-expression cannot be narrowed from type 'long = long' to 'std::size_t' (aka 'unsi > gned int') in initializer list [-Wc++11-narrowing] > std::size_t resultBytes{size * elementBytes}; > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > = /wrkdirs/usr/ports/devel/llvm13/work/llvm-project-13.0.0.src/flang/runtime= /misc-intrinsic.cpp:50:27: note: insert an explicit cast to silence this = issue > std::size_t resultBytes{size * elementBytes}; > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > static_cast( ) The flang subproject does quite a lot of mixing of size_t and uint64_t, = assuming in various places that they are the same. You will also = encounter similar errors when attempting to build it for e.g. i386, or = other 32 bit architectures. I think it is quite a lot of work to get all = of these right, and it should really be discussed upstream. So for now, I would advise to only turn on the flang option for amd64 by = default. -Dimitry --Apple-Mail=_73807854-0A8A-41CA-A301-8309F9FC216B Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.2 iF0EARECAB0WIQR6tGLSzjX8bUI5T82wXqMKLiCWowUCYZKpugAKCRCwXqMKLiCW o68qAKDP8WfByS2UovTvl8L2lHFYdYuBFwCgqi2aK0EdPp2/jZ8CuDTUGX2s+Bg= =xxGf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_73807854-0A8A-41CA-A301-8309F9FC216B-- From nobody Mon Nov 15 19:35:30 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16FDA189BDDE for ; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 19:35:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marklmi@yahoo.com) Received: from sonic307-55.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (sonic307-55.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com [98.137.64.31]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HtKDD47Vqz4lYf for ; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 19:35:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marklmi@yahoo.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1637004938; bh=W4gFthozDO6PSjo0AW+gqAsC8sdi8ZAH8sKjCYiWZ0o=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To:From:Subject:Reply-To; b=ldYoifUOkXtIIoGJjxeDRam0QbiKltfjLh7y/qou3yUsB03uUhYBVnJzmkQqQTQsfZI+KInjNbb30yWrSBftr4HV9UMjjjU0XI6j5yXzlC2mQeDTHJrMAU1cYeJyjWTexNGh8DV+3U7kfI/WkUzC3b+cvztY2XxrQPnWxUFGqAaRqJFv+/aCfrwVgw8B5UfKuvGdkq2NfGYcgj+yx4HZ5maGeOmkyIMu4BatEetAuombrCNIBP2Qp8XTKmce4VW6Hyy/+jADfGi8dGgYFnn8zAV6R8MYsR4xxXy4oLhTa7h7yTRN1pBB3J7VsEfyDCTGy0z9qg1h0sXjwKOEsa9chg== X-SONIC-DKIM-SIGN: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1637004938; bh=hTmbZwqv+gtE1wmSoGoXntG0nPzFlW8153rtnMZqPXJ=; h=X-Sonic-MF:Subject:From:Date:To:From:Subject; b=Koo5SNEcPr9L+2g0CeLxGBMY1L7EpsDBnZPd3qB8nEBKtP64ThZnMvruGjhrzkfcbd/QqpthAUIvZyCCauKpt/5NTvZSfkemQXJXlswQLbrWqcyw4ipYZ+QOf7o4fePqNalfM36nCLOsKbIVcu0BP/gvx8qNyAEBRGpkvrQxzJ+X+4Q6WB5pxRdP2kcmRd9gmrwopWaafRRsIYGPVuYNM8BY2A0UPPSwHgk+6A6ijSHl4ixEXjqxL3cTZz67RLvhoFyuxBznHphh6HuQowyTsFNRnIyE9Za18trWkVvuJViJgWyt5hgpe/DA7NKpaLE5/DW32f4TlVJIBOWk7tVSfA== X-YMail-OSG: zPr6DUAVM1lzdnPqwf3EXCraVyv6OL.zHIqX5DKeDfElYKTbXXGYe13fleUeK0B fJdVSksQqIFubCn1oJaSDBl1vJkBDchgmV6fr3ZBEi5nWQxpn.QCLd87U_OiSDuNNFqvL.6O02Lk uvZkcQTsTNKBhRfpQiTxnXmKRUYMhZYQ1NmLbKMMDd2SjQqqzkI99nsAQ7S.kcwu06koTsYx4rxA eB33lynjgcWVjGBNLXttzssc3NPWuXjd3GW.vgKb3SIfRI9Kg5DwXEwBfF4nuxft93wVAVDtmslz PI1gaCOBNMKZpc4bGUtsy6Upl9emIEOG6llob0uqrsC.mukfUmge.WODWbjtIagCXtQnscaFR06b QrCkfUdgcyVfXHtygKYNCRZfoKT_hXlVpKZ1xjackwS5579eiDmWKOd7lCfRDOeykVHCnbQFdg7Q HN1Z7.wLSxu8dfhbBVdLcygCfT3xy81sWDf5Cy3Qwc59w_3jQJFyLatTmbXu78hCpHfB_y5uLrir .oOD_vcINmHze6xmJF6140tn5UcaauYbfLNAo7VK28uVF4bb1VwO5ec41yJrnHzRZw9jLHxpcog7 CshSWQu2VnGs7PVjWz5BZpDDoiN5rJeAXDwus5FcCsfp8sS1adkNCA26IV2Awd6Q8RblkAgdsaqK ZF2zwTndOaKV4GJLAq71SFl317OYUXRseSiltydkm43_K4FUUCtEX5MTNRkwsrKYpI_5uIwdqaJW zyXEJcRP1kaRE8OVCyXCyrHY_JKeHN0EbrTxp_2F7m53klJXDx.UGVvbT9lLJr3FRy3iKXF2mSQG HGrcp2NH4i65Hu2tk11PNq7TpitupKLBBtE3qCsJJFX9cJwVIXnQ991gFP9FzX56GTfxu5taxLfQ r_CWZwsS7IIFVq8oNBflUHnnJR_NQkqrCnaGZq1nkOvrF4J0jd6uJT8qxMwz2m6RKBLy60xKPizE bCVRom8hNvuVNWdd6N8AVG8VfiZGFEKyqnRAhgf5b.NtFauZTpGjlRmBsNNVNNHo3SR9s4mZdW_s 5TFzeR7htDO3zf9GeRVuekqE0Egba1.DELwdMW4NSq0sDd36ftUPGtvDp5MD5lIWBLR6btICgtwh kHvz2CFBEWGSTI7JoagctOXnwokTrtdqPz.2RsiVm8nJCinDr.ugWe4HyFkn.HXr8jy_tg.OpGap aDzPZumj.NGMQUL74.m64py70DVdVlih1kAb7hzYFxUuOdCT2AgSlX5VNnlTe.h4USlBDg8YPUIt gQCMjoba39QCZCFtSHnGItb2NyVWzJNc_1vjX.cBIwDjHV0MdE_Mgv8HUaYE6eBm6NN37sOalKnz bJe468bRHbaFVi3mIUbIwM5R7F06hBMjb4Is8A9oOpKRA8fhMfWc1g.OEoWpeAbK3XqYb8GgaN7B BUOoxTfWtJ.D6idhp9CkhIYRkGsKPdZi.LvBiIAe5mlVK_nvvBcEEK8A8B30ZNjNog9NBBDNHfa8 sxBVDpBpogKPGq7ERIi32KhqtnKw9OHEPvteY9OuNlcgYczfkzsxLE2OF9bMM4VlIMo8.IfjCR26 3vOXH49.r8fwkFIY8MkJXIVAVw8XQ08NZx4KJcpJ2rsTqBcmaW2SArylwYMjzkBF1z_EprbAu7Zp aloMx20fb_VSu5s2y6Hl2sbAhzyOVptLGjWVOY.UtmFVoK.C3BMYhuxxmP2aw6ltaUInolZszGYt .EWwsPcvtjp4ePRE15_csqtb05y9CxQG2SCgPAV.sN06aopWuM4FtA7eqrx9T4606C2G64AzcuPh YEL1AyMUW.8WvdgQBPBP.2.i_DmzL0kKIH_64in74AIch35ToDuRTa9bubcT3jSg0AzQWgveL53a fRiBwuI.fsal0NCGZmSGeJa_ESEDkZK8kdJvuz3OkSp6HFWOKzLOI2cwMj0N9OgonSMu4iLrkscV qtvX.DpkJ5g5NHk1tjJpBYd12lGMKf7LK0_pFER0On71D1I9w6tmMLrw6QcrQPRMm3Kf_x459Gvd 23thTk0.oDZXCegN3iHIxh95QrakqlAKhmLEurNJhhxo4TTHlYAA5j3.6Co8P9A57PuP_N8TRsLd 3tbgfXPh01jeHZR5WBhtlQe1quF2bRpuwrO37AQ2NMLVqk7jww2vUwsrDFkXu1m495wEsZZrog9Q yJ5RB5Bf_aBc5t_aAJFtG5sEnMEPjUO_nZvn.lD0MhB9oBhnS7.AqKzsUbMijKN2KOb56FM8LU6K MjMXlgc3conqOUAejMPcDjEHl6ungw_AuugmgsPbyMJrOxthN X-Sonic-MF: Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic307.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with HTTP; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 19:35:38 +0000 Received: by kubenode549.mail-prod1.omega.gq1.yahoo.com (VZM Hermes SMTP Server) with ESMTPA ID 83fe48e92d87a725de8beeca5848aea2; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 19:35:31 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.120.0.1.13\)) Subject: Re: armv7 targeting (on aarch64, via poudriere-devel): system's clang 13 rejected building devel/lllvm13 In-Reply-To: <91AD337B-6D40-4639-A43C-688699981167@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2021 11:35:30 -0800 Cc: "brooks@freebsd.org" , FreeBSD Toolchain , freebsd-current , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, "freebsd-arm@freebsd.org" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <3F3F1A2B-87E2-47CA-A9C6-BC65B71F1DE7@yahoo.com> References: <15A74B79-47CF-4743-A831-D7C0E9B1DD0E.ref@yahoo.com> <15A74B79-47CF-4743-A831-D7C0E9B1DD0E@yahoo.com> <91AD337B-6D40-4639-A43C-688699981167@FreeBSD.org> To: Dimitry Andric X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.120.0.1.13) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4HtKDD47Vqz4lYf X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[] Reply-To: marklmi@yahoo.com From: Mark Millard via freebsd-toolchain X-Original-From: Mark Millard X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N On 2021-Nov-15, at 10:40, Dimitry Andric wrote: > On 15 Nov 2021, at 19:14, Mark Millard via arm = wrote: >>=20 >> There error was: >>=20 >> error: non-constant-expression cannot be narrowed from type 'long = long' to 'std::size_t' (aka 'unsi >> gned int') in initializer list [-Wc++11-narrowing] >> std::size_t resultBytes{size * elementBytes}; >> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> = /wrkdirs/usr/ports/devel/llvm13/work/llvm-project-13.0.0.src/flang/runtime= /misc-intrinsic.cpp:50:27: note: insert an explicit cast to silence this = issue >> std::size_t resultBytes{size * elementBytes}; >> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> static_cast( ) >=20 > The flang subproject does quite a lot of mixing of size_t and = uint64_t, assuming in various places that they are the same. You will = also encounter similar errors when attempting to build it for e.g. i386, = or other 32 bit architectures. I think it is quite a lot of work to get = all of these right, and it should really be discussed upstream. >=20 > So for now, I would advise to only turn on the flang option for amd64 = by default. flang was not being built: # more /usr/local/etc/poudriere.d/options/devel_llvm13/options=20 # This file is auto-generated by 'make config'. # Options for llvm13-13.0.0 _OPTIONS_READ=3Dllvm13-13.0.0 _FILE_COMPLETE_OPTIONS_LIST=3DBE_AMDGPU CLANG DOCS EXTRAS FLANG LIT LLD = LLDB MLIR OPENMP PYCLANG BE_FREEBSD BE_NATIVE BE_STANDARD OPTIONS_FILE_SET+=3DBE_AMDGPU OPTIONS_FILE_SET+=3DCLANG OPTIONS_FILE_SET+=3DDOCS OPTIONS_FILE_SET+=3DEXTRAS OPTIONS_FILE_UNSET+=3DFLANG OPTIONS_FILE_SET+=3DLIT OPTIONS_FILE_SET+=3DLLD OPTIONS_FILE_SET+=3DLLDB OPTIONS_FILE_SET+=3DMLIR OPTIONS_FILE_UNSET+=3DOPENMP OPTIONS_FILE_UNSET+=3DPYCLANG OPTIONS_FILE_UNSET+=3DBE_FREEBSD OPTIONS_FILE_SET+=3DBE_NATIVE OPTIONS_FILE_UNSET+=3DBE_STANDARD =3D=3D=3D Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away in early 2018-Mar) From nobody Mon Nov 15 19:40:49 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDB6C189EAD0 for ; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 19:40:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marklmi@yahoo.com) Received: from sonic301-22.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (sonic301-22.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com [98.137.64.148]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HtKLC5c7dz4pTc for ; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 19:40:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marklmi@yahoo.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1637005250; bh=+p2DghXewEsz34Ggp03Hl7+aPLMgnqmo5G2xRC2m2vc=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To:From:Subject:Reply-To; b=ijCk5eDfDZwZbSII8rPf3AJdQ1GkAy3YZ9MX+2Ix12fjpMPUWtgz6o6e6dYiRQA2QrigLkrKjmRZpXLnRFUH7nwSeNpNUG2X0bPmtNMBFTWimE/ifQyyZe7yaUl7b+aArxuLBN3n7rjo4qdo0z+n7Etrk8Bt97rZ5Qdlh2f6uK2n0o/d7BKtbKhWbnbDvLvU6ptXQLGD9pHJo+idBi/Wrs0T5QsXnn6MvXY8GQDBKhpcjz4BpHN0qNdGhmiKG+58zGQoRHvrTEpLm9RK5UhYXy0PcgoSc4Cmk7fiqxfcVQNvDYhBGNdApBBMPrbvYyehpzselNVHbU+rclrrXtfWsw== X-SONIC-DKIM-SIGN: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1637005250; bh=4mf6UxGYgvbdjmhW6+3l+S1mIpkobCA3ZcdB0ZqPvWB=; h=X-Sonic-MF:Subject:From:Date:To:From:Subject; b=W50hYnXup8BVWIcifbt/iWNUfrD232X1EGQWyB1N0yN9+vRLwVj/kUWieAa6gSvRR6goRor5JOknUkKtVDtI9NO9zlnr6vJXctj0kRjYVPWj3C3srMoZyhmzJlYHfvQ9MsKO0g52xThqZGmREC2kFGurYo2+LcE2gGeDFmlRNMDVTlYaGRBLJK7RJvJ5JhhLW3KnLLhqFQ7FyZf0rBu2gSL8Q0sUleq8gkIrNuOBSxlwLphZA0qhxXLS0sdMPVmTnYif8usvOucx7+C8A8YJhodQb0hI8QUi+tnsit7k2HUH616bNbYqKezeHBku8cXkj0qgPX+TmbuTqK9qxfXg5A== X-YMail-OSG: lTkiFAoVM1mnQ7WUNVhGGXnYpwgTMd6LoZmILn3gd.kClCCnIPSwoJNnLuNSiOw mSFjezMW5v_ZUnwkTvIHeOPRX_.1iX0BEHRVGK18h6tN7TawmkSFQl7lhEELxX8Fv4mjy0Dptxqr xtwz3K1.KQshmSiVrLvUggsKDGa_jsdrinRaAv5fHLkUy.9w3i5w7EomYByiJ.DwNiJNPTaGLyxP dmwbWl7IjLmEVwIdjQZCjCMEM0W5GTkWlgubL0LFninWYAue_AF7AFZGSIDJ8oKaZzRy_7AnBbZS aICYjtANx_tfMO2nR5e_RlvbItFhSBn8R8OjUxrPqJLmUsqq42zu00VCM_ALi8iuyvksmoE04zb_ 6oXQsfOCgKXDriU_TpxBw9mp5ZNd111r2NhWskgFV1v23CSvVn9zQGB4_b8BzqVUu37gdaHEKzTj K4v6yIxfU.OMNc0JUYN2B3vrtzZEdz.NdB8VIEFEsvb0yegS0M3e1hAn2nj32oCFXBQqBL10s3EX 4g8oIWE_n3jjtaPxbLD2EvJbeX4TKWVzPFPy7fcoT.UNihNhSkO14q7jcT8SOL1zL1o7xWmmRlhc hgE2gLhUBUNglatmKYZJc_ovz5ydJx4MqhL4cUsJDYHZKtONg2N2PJfuDsRpJekmq.6vB2ODrSE7 JZXTxooFnOYxGr4_tYp58PpR8Xh1Vc4oYUbx0i93OSg775u8axARJy_Wgi4zmdAybMuYzGFX8SXB 0prXHkI.UWlrvluGYQqiQ97w3MOis8kluulcafQGbsIi6BqqFnYclzz0dL7_BvJKle9g9CRqYBke 0benIYGU5RvTN8iShUWS5WN6qt16iXdM7Mb2Fh_AJzl1oajnsHmNz7v5w65uAOTUW.9gXkbQijv_ fumLcZya6B.pWHfFubkcVjxm5165NQxeZZsPbelWAh.ItWVq58BjQYsyZXtSR.bycB9lnTSseXu0 x3JW3I16PuxxgTbLhoiONdr2hilE6plPh0APY2smjsNODguA6EjXZ_2j8Yoge5_IjO.euDe_cCt0 MFAjILS9c19_66ZiCDkJX6w6JnPGYZDJVy2PVR_dWiMzdHjJdn1rkstY.My4aNRei.Zth0FoJlQk Rhz8kvhMfsas_A_VVp3.DXVuWS1xaXd8t_Sa6t_yoKgk3MYCYB9z6BBz0vthAmJ8dAs5RfQ5fW2N N29sRBPKOpqaccfXDg.IGHZUQ813VoA6p25bZdH57COrG7.zoG4plFVRQpMwd0Nn_oYCT3zr6SJ7 wwkFddvCH5408w9Kq0SNgCMAjl0FdUFpwGxPFadL7XSAAlgihkPp6U6_7C6NsObQBO6lL0ISy9DW zj4pv.fqJjDwe_AKW5ZLzA0cRvCJJ8AwaBOm.CO90UHSSp5WA6Kfgvo5x7K97cLUrQxiUSkMqS3x UA5OSRsOeu1kv2ILT1rSMPtlvZYxpeHwzNWbz38IeQO8EHHHEpf2TS8m.sMk394XBCdmFTabwBZj rIBnJt0jiUtx.4KtMR1ukyiKXo3VqpeC84vnmjcWimeOnfZSDg0OCAmu8p5WJh0.6gtTJRIsZLiK 9UuAULanTNFwlWMxoy.bJ0hEqOclkOm9XtlMYoCHBrOQhl2mxBu_48bF8nftsSEXdUsiNm6j74_R L.pYBA5reaKOW60.ccn.CY1ChY.pcGMawIX.WEepkWc0XurC6R7pANsmKUv3Poa8R74U81jahR7r otGAV42ohGIkdcQoYrUtbGIXK_iaIHlJXZsnWWsNkrmmoxsFkYuyoHVt4N7HU8H7hHGTOz_O9kIz S7MY7_6uTqiA4EIcAcZNIy01Z7BCjghlzPWHBwNHNiO7kreWmndUJ0DKEJ1gbfRJaG9W3sWMdDkU ZdZZRI74uJyrUWrSCm7TjeAk4UwOu2blRX2jGJbl7jQtEgJtuCTQoDh.LxmCSd3U38LasEBVUErM DCLp6pLjCYVFiNnfzMa1l3a0YDecpBpBZJyXn1tJP5FHeTE08PMzfZaS99HBXLt3jbe0ODg6rft_ WIIo6EJ50imok4T7ZILA39en7FuWBwl9UZs71ILaJCtrqdLjW0ysXzTvlf48MI.s1RNK.YWjCsUw nWX7N_mWyu7gNhNK78a.dKKafJdjmcN8o1MQ02pXCiGYjL_ffug_.UZgrdRdT3s15W1bzEVtZ0tD eudeuw9AsZwcWty08PjIyDLDtvBtDoe5W.kPYnUXZm4TaD1TKedqTC5kz6hRZR771ZQ1tF8iEu_5 CA0G_RippaQrqkltFa90OsjXI76zbV3Fob5UGt2L463nho2scPgT2gmMHNgBt2Inznc2HBjjLhNr bi1.qqirmVwAnAKQJWH56BHhDzC0- X-Sonic-MF: Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic301.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with HTTP; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 19:40:50 +0000 Received: by kubenode548.mail-prod1.omega.gq1.yahoo.com (VZM Hermes SMTP Server) with ESMTPA ID d01971386b38a54d52fdea58f2d7e88f; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 19:40:50 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.120.0.1.13\)) Subject: Re: armv7 targeting (on aarch64, via poudriere-devel): system's clang 13 rejected building devel/lllvm13 In-Reply-To: <3F3F1A2B-87E2-47CA-A9C6-BC65B71F1DE7@yahoo.com> Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2021 11:40:49 -0800 Cc: "brooks@freebsd.org" , FreeBSD Toolchain , freebsd-current , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, "freebsd-arm@freebsd.org" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <15A74B79-47CF-4743-A831-D7C0E9B1DD0E.ref@yahoo.com> <15A74B79-47CF-4743-A831-D7C0E9B1DD0E@yahoo.com> <91AD337B-6D40-4639-A43C-688699981167@FreeBSD.org> <3F3F1A2B-87E2-47CA-A9C6-BC65B71F1DE7@yahoo.com> To: Dimitry Andric X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.120.0.1.13) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4HtKLC5c7dz4pTc X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=yahoo.com header.s=s2048 header.b=ijCk5eDf; dmarc=pass (policy=reject) header.from=yahoo.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of marklmi@yahoo.com designates 98.137.64.148 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=marklmi@yahoo.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.50 / 15.00]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[yahoo.com]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ptr:yahoo.com]; RCPT_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[6]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[yahoo.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[yahoo.com,reject]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[yahoo.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:36647, ipnet:98.137.64.0/20, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[yahoo.com:dkim]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[yahoo.com:s=s2048]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(1.00)[1.000]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[98.137.64.148:from]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[98.137.64.148:from]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] Reply-To: marklmi@yahoo.com From: Mark Millard via freebsd-toolchain X-Original-From: Mark Millard X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N On 2021-Nov-15, at 11:35, Mark Millard wrote: > On 2021-Nov-15, at 10:40, Dimitry Andric wrote: >=20 >> On 15 Nov 2021, at 19:14, Mark Millard via arm = wrote: >>>=20 >>> There error was: >>>=20 >>> error: non-constant-expression cannot be narrowed from type 'long = long' to 'std::size_t' (aka 'unsi >>> gned int') in initializer list [-Wc++11-narrowing] >>> std::size_t resultBytes{size * elementBytes}; >>> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >>> = /wrkdirs/usr/ports/devel/llvm13/work/llvm-project-13.0.0.src/flang/runtime= /misc-intrinsic.cpp:50:27: note: insert an explicit cast to silence this = issue >>> std::size_t resultBytes{size * elementBytes}; >>> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >>> static_cast( ) >>=20 >> The flang subproject does quite a lot of mixing of size_t and = uint64_t, assuming in various places that they are the same. You will = also encounter similar errors when attempting to build it for e.g. i386, = or other 32 bit architectures. I think it is quite a lot of work to get = all of these right, and it should really be discussed upstream. >>=20 >> So for now, I would advise to only turn on the flang option for amd64 = by default. >=20 > flang was not being built: >=20 > # more /usr/local/etc/poudriere.d/options/devel_llvm13/options=20 > # This file is auto-generated by 'make config'. > # Options for llvm13-13.0.0 > _OPTIONS_READ=3Dllvm13-13.0.0 > _FILE_COMPLETE_OPTIONS_LIST=3DBE_AMDGPU CLANG DOCS EXTRAS FLANG LIT = LLD LLDB MLIR OPENMP PYCLANG BE_FREEBSD BE_NATIVE BE_STANDARD > OPTIONS_FILE_SET+=3DBE_AMDGPU > OPTIONS_FILE_SET+=3DCLANG > OPTIONS_FILE_SET+=3DDOCS > OPTIONS_FILE_SET+=3DEXTRAS > OPTIONS_FILE_UNSET+=3DFLANG > OPTIONS_FILE_SET+=3DLIT > OPTIONS_FILE_SET+=3DLLD > OPTIONS_FILE_SET+=3DLLDB > OPTIONS_FILE_SET+=3DMLIR > OPTIONS_FILE_UNSET+=3DOPENMP > OPTIONS_FILE_UNSET+=3DPYCLANG > OPTIONS_FILE_UNSET+=3DBE_FREEBSD > OPTIONS_FILE_SET+=3DBE_NATIVE > OPTIONS_FILE_UNSET+=3DBE_STANDARD >=20 Hmm. I got that wrong, somehow the above was not used. =46rom the log file: ---Begin OPTIONS List--- =3D=3D=3D> The following configuration options are available for = llvm13-13.0.0_2: BE_AMDGPU=3Don: AMD GPU backend (required by mesa) CLANG=3Don: Build clang DOCS=3Don: Build and/or install documentation EXTRAS=3Don: Extra clang tools FLANG=3Don: Flang FORTRAN compiler LIT=3Don: Install lit and FileCheck test tools LLD=3Don: Install lld, the LLVM linker LLDB=3Don: Install lldb, the LLVM debugger MLIR=3Don: Multi-Level Intermediate Representation PYCLANG=3Don: Install python bindings to libclang =3D=3D=3D=3D> Options available for the single BACKENDS: you have to = select exactly one of them BE_FREEBSD=3Doff: Backends for FreeBSD architectures BE_NATIVE=3Doff: Backend(s) for this architecture (ARM) BE_STANDARD=3Don: All non-experimental backends =3D=3D=3D> Use 'make config' to modify these settings =3D=3D=3D Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away in early 2018-Mar) From nobody Mon Nov 15 22:58:45 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5995E1895009 for ; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 22:59:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marklmi@yahoo.com) Received: from sonic304-25.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (sonic304-25.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com [98.137.68.206]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HtPkq2C1Fz3FFJ for ; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 22:58:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marklmi@yahoo.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1637017132; bh=zJV2JhQd7VCTUzUhbYbenR1Tj2hT18OsyPOq+PEAqPw=; h=From:Subject:Date:To:References:From:Subject:Reply-To; b=s0aYyaITUvXOzjzJ55V5I/ejC1nyl5VDQGlXrWsuk1Kfjynd0xujCrrztJ0GRz4IMyl2ZkLOfvsqCcYykART+9hNDK+Ai7m+CV6copUOg1DKDvc4NUoRWmXmJcPzlHzkMmZfyzA7zMxSz2itGfm7LQxp2XYx0EMOL6ilgihN0FYfMogr0VKulCl08Cuko92t87PD5srLQ/g5XMGU0u43OCEOeHFMA+2voub7h/BE83ijfA7gqaw8tKY0B8OTs1e5F1c8WhDFtW7mOy0EddgF+x+1D5T9mYVLNZqYzVxrS7Y+3zWxAPkuozILC7j9d76HRl/WUdgM/OhIMoJKMPzBbA== X-SONIC-DKIM-SIGN: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1637017132; bh=oEtnqw8TfL6s9lvR0RhpHMSJyIq2KiADDbLl0jalbhT=; h=X-Sonic-MF:From:Subject:Date:To:From:Subject; b=N3eDkYPwcHWSNXk9sAV2Gy+y07bgHnsjVNFlmlpYhvYrLfH+/TIqrRrtT3jv2htVexatqYJ8TwOSaNpAQ66E/UvCTCaejwgBjIYYLUyP6I4d1eTHYOu9MF8p3PBlO7t5v2NJwrFPNtlDvqGJuI8KwCjBH51wm1CGnqMMz+Rbt3gSIiMjPAA8xjIqNDcqfpcOWsCN0wfvF+NT5I8Q6HzfUkxUQmsurDQUnaxgwf7eb8gHpiAJeK3juFwEfi0UhRIdOsXb3fIDJwoim8D1uTXzHobdW+yarALqTI0DycH7Clz3jYutO4Ya42z7qWR0ZrqmyCtMboSUKp+KkIkcMjvJOg== X-YMail-OSG: ygcXclAVM1kwajl2huBDxU8WJk497.9LtwSevUeB8s37T6HHYriE5tIB3f4DED3 9.V5QVx4hzxp6bN31Y.rlPTmz0R_9bqUEnwnyn0_INfpClbwWv3mAMdmkTmWdskBaMrbHQ63sGZp esd3HMByhMBG9UNjabUy9_nLBxhAgquFR3dSSsdy2BsGrvs0I8MGSY7o0OwrWV3_G3_WYJjCmPqq JkKVt2McHLBzNmvw_raGyrT3lNizDBitjaWCLOPt0khjQDYlr4SHgfNk6ukvxya7NoR1poO58AMJ oRlZvuhwS6QXhLzn_jE8hJ2sMEwcGuAqOvsD8CMKpwR2PNG8KiTNWP4i.9hSC3XqXyzytroX9Ao0 L3Db9e6g6edI7rIqtYiqXmIrGd7IjyOp6nq_X7C2yhC.bO91YVUpM3.ofRCKfUf4UOHckRrE.sHQ 6q8jcvI6zRAJ2HutA3rL3N3OsVee9.UNDbndv_Zc21VWPCCYdD5P8YG7fqSCe8n2YS7TYhVIzxc7 iTiBCcMh_fL8PZ9bvkWgVJQLYwPc2g56acUXg38.dytOfwFOEXM.EeWEV1fFs_q8hi1yHwRhbd82 WyJoL0iZUY3jE4gqpqvuu8XqrfQ285bCRY_UIkb_XGPDJApAAuYf4hUHINhAAGv8fVxJDX7UpoBX au4WNwqTy1xd57aidG7pSN.qBdKOs15KUrmdtucUKxzLXrGCPAY9q7igZCae4QHj0eT9rB9ByCs9 fLUBeSpLNy6GQ6POshZdJtB7QJOXwaeP2RhP9GghwGupOE_ysaRnAPbpf2t6p2vPBHlUGsuqejDP SGy2R970jbeNwE67NRr263noyYLgS0hwYQ.M3iqpt8AfOM9FW4MgQjG_HWNcJFZqGyUhaTO1o_X6 f9Dy4zDRIRX.4wmh2OLFY1QSd9klMM6DSQPkN9EH.Lp4iZWKe0hWsCnZXA6JwQ9rLbhoxGtGcuIL hc_euQF28fYCawHWVXJkglUqCn7eSQ0kYxrs8x3aaXNmvyL3xDOqLeZVjQBQxZojrKGiUHx2qx3s 4c4pPbcbzGTdlMxytlBtkS1PjhrI.l66BGPLa1PexuU5aFpCcjrVfPeANe5wo4j1sua_i4.DVJNG MAXIDEXhHmwNKM82P7kIOYXrv58NBXe3mTtyDXryBQ_hUIJDCxwISsLqS.NYOtyja97SVgM58a2W mlAJH1Wc.3IGXWfuoKEyfUPb0fhvkJssGQBCjRoa8x2snxJ9wK25Itc_Bb.r08.iOQ_D5PeeWktl NM7F4WkTW4mU7BtbRyPOccUnwONlnlVF51Vb8By3AA9jR6k0.2waGTj5nFtrih_gyFHyPf2WeJGr PPt.4h8YaB8d9_gVo0Z62oyC3YmVIAPH5BirjF2ndcDSDHx7wY03Exf8eI4SJRbp9wBM2EXq06zh H4MIQg__axlcKkvEhIxxTQjniYyQJV73ZG2.2EksY55Uz07kej7.qYf_H8dFwqrSIflDjIQ6Skxo ecwwzUXIfxqb_HRP9MQLPN32V6Zu9.mDxVbs2PRIkul00TKM3ks_brVn.5AD8Zt1hUXmUfzWB9fG KYqh4OJysRlrH.An0RmWdptthkuIEFnDEzlZJ7.htl6dpDJ.5P_vFWhsy9.AkMHz0lif0aDkajOW dqyzG0g3Jvs2q4c.rcYBocoBwTnilz7c7BWnXHGgoKLIvV.N6W7JShoD_9aBreqg_gUWmvp2I9Oy lGiSKIetOeoShxNE4nkEgvnvSc5aGvrpuZDTHCg0freBuS5d.smITJ8AROj0kJc7AABz9o9Kuz.u P7cJjz0BKKbaEYDDq8ZJlR0A.uKA09zCCaSy0Yl4vZF2eU4grQXcGSMdFkjtD5zNYiXfjWWvYvIv SNhim6O5Kh4tLlZjBIX5qlyBUR5QggwBUBaeHR266Yi8WJrNIVCHNthlVZMyizpM.sPmwf3J_T5J ErZib2GrE6xVHQOO5_6eFR1cv5BB6og43WHe7dxt1miyUcK_mykoNTsuX7r6pJ09MmYHUve2MbbK uMLkvWjA.4CCusohPXJ6eMboD1H6kfVG5f_LCUJPtyrt7idHMR0.1wCZZPpM2SCxZrfQIcpGfXA7 K67yWFj6FBE.AIEBLkj7OGKgKEy0oOZvnlCci_2Moio.Wr5bNxeaNicW7jbkVIX8euAt9GdWO_Hy rlwfSCWDEB2mVycfBNwTIgBqtHrGbIG5jBIC9hZgbKsLtWG1nOSUkUj5QD_JN.VeTnyxmu0HtncU IxTR1y6GtfrT1W7htT1GKp6P9VT7IB2okAMqC.GLc3Uq65clFSeiwHoBjCpiAjqGt4dXur8mXI3v tngQLgBCFKkhLTzmDk5D_zHcTZA-- X-Sonic-MF: Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic304.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with HTTP; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 22:58:52 +0000 Received: by kubenode507.mail-prod1.omega.ne1.yahoo.com (VZM Hermes SMTP Server) with ESMTPA ID 5076b8faed2cc7b3447a04e8e832e743; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 22:58:47 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.120.0.1.13\)) Subject: missing poudriere-devel output: an example Message-Id: Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2021 14:58:45 -0800 To: Bryan Drewery , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, FreeBSD Toolchain X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.120.0.1.13) References: X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4HtPkq2C1Fz3FFJ X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=yahoo.com header.s=s2048 header.b=s0aYyaIT; dmarc=pass (policy=reject) header.from=yahoo.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of marklmi@yahoo.com designates 98.137.68.206 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=marklmi@yahoo.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.50 / 15.00]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[yahoo.com:s=s2048]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[98.137.68.206:from]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[yahoo.com]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ptr:yahoo.com]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(1.00)[1.000]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[yahoo.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[yahoo.com,reject]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[98.137.68.206:from]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-0.998]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[yahoo.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:36647, ipnet:98.137.64.0/20, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[yahoo.com:dkim] Reply-To: marklmi@yahoo.com From: Mark Millard via freebsd-ports X-Original-From: Mark Millard X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N In the following output from poudriere-devel there is no report of devel/llvm13 in [02] being "Finished" or [02] starting devel/qt5-help but there is a report of [02] finishing devel/qt5-help . The "Built ports" list does include devel/llvm13 . . . . load: 32.63 cmd: sh 40873 [runnable] 0.01r 0.00u 0.00s 0% 3560k [13_0R-CA7-default] [2021-11-15_11h52m20s] [parallel_build:] Queued: 38 = Built: 0 Failed: 1 Skipped: 0 Ignored: 0 Fetched: 0 Tobuild: 37 = Time: 00:49:31 [01]: devel/llvm12 | llvm12-12.0.1_6 = build (00:46:51 / 00:49:06) [02]: devel/llvm13 | llvm13-13.0.0_2 = build (00:46:17 / 00:49:06) [00:49:35] Logs: = /usr/local/poudriere/data/logs/bulk/13_0R-CA7-default/2021-11-15_11h52m20s= load: 18.04 cmd: sh 61936 [nanslp] 5830.86r 6.93u 22.54s 0% 3560k mi_switch+0x104 sleepq_catch_signals+0x41c sleepq_timedwait_sig+0x14 = _sleep+0x1c0 kern_clock_nanosleep+0x1ac sys_nanosleep+0x3c = do_el0_sync+0x4c4 handle_el0_sync+0x90=20 [13_0R-CA7-default] [2021-11-15_11h52m20s] [parallel_build:] Queued: 38 = Built: 0 Failed: 1 Skipped: 0 Ignored: 0 Fetched: 0 Tobuild: 37 = Time: 01:37:11 [01]: devel/llvm12 | llvm12-12.0.1_6 = package (00:03:14 / 01:36:46) [02]: devel/llvm13 | llvm13-13.0.0_2 = build (01:33:57 / 01:36:46) [01:37:15] Logs: = /usr/local/poudriere/data/logs/bulk/13_0R-CA7-default/2021-11-15_11h52m20s= [01:44:09] [01] [01:43:40] Finished devel/llvm12 | llvm12-12.0.1_6: = Success [01:44:31] [01] [00:00:00] Building graphics/mesa-dri | mesa-dri-21.1.8 [01:49:48] [01] [00:05:17] Finished graphics/mesa-dri | mesa-dri-21.1.8: = Success [01:49:49] [01] [00:00:00] Building x11-toolkits/qt5-gui | = qt5-gui-5.15.2_7 [01:49:49] [03] [00:00:00] Building x11-servers/xorg-server | = xorg-server-1.20.13,1 [01:54:44] [03] [00:04:55] Finished x11-servers/xorg-server | = xorg-server-1.20.13,1: Success [01:54:44] [03] [00:00:00] Building x11-drivers/xf86-input-libinput | = xf86-input-libinput-0.30.0_1 [01:54:44] [04] [00:00:00] Building x11-drivers/xf86-video-vesa | = xf86-video-vesa-2.5.0 [01:54:44] [05] [00:00:00] Building x11-drivers/xf86-video-scfb | = xf86-video-scfb-0.0.5_2 [01:56:00] [05] [00:01:16] Finished x11-drivers/xf86-video-scfb | = xf86-video-scfb-0.0.5_2: Success [01:56:01] [04] [00:01:17] Finished x11-drivers/xf86-video-vesa | = xf86-video-vesa-2.5.0: Success [01:56:13] [03] [00:01:29] Finished x11-drivers/xf86-input-libinput | = xf86-input-libinput-0.30.0_1: Success [01:56:13] [03] [00:00:00] Building x11/xorg-minimal | = xorg-minimal-7.5.2_3 [01:57:07] [03] [00:00:54] Finished x11/xorg-minimal | = xorg-minimal-7.5.2_3: Success [02:01:00] [01] [00:11:11] Finished x11-toolkits/qt5-gui | = qt5-gui-5.15.2_7: Success [02:01:01] [01] [00:00:00] Building x11-toolkits/qt5-widgets | = qt5-widgets-5.15.2_3 [02:01:01] [03] [00:00:00] Building graphics/qt5-imageformats | = qt5-imageformats-5.15.2 [02:01:01] [04] [00:00:00] Building x11/qt5-x11extras | = qt5-x11extras-5.15.2_1 [02:08:59] [03] [00:01:48] Finished x11-toolkits/qt5-uiplugin | = qt5-uiplugin-5.15.2: Success [02:08:59] [03] [00:00:00] Building devel/qt5-uitools | = qt5-uitools-5.15.2_1 [02:09:48] [07] [00:02:37] Finished graphics/qt5-svg | qt5-svg-5.15.2_1: = Success [02:10:22] [02] [00:03:11] Finished devel/qt5-help | qt5-help-5.15.2_1: = Success [02:11:51] [01] [00:04:40] Finished print/qt5-printsupport | = qt5-printsupport-5.15.2_1: Success [02:11:53] [01] [00:00:00] Building devel/qt5-assistant | = qt5-assistant-5.15.2 [02:11:56] [05] [00:04:45] Finished graphics/qt5-opengl | = qt5-opengl-5.15.2_2: Success [02:13:01] [06] [00:05:50] Finished graphics/poppler-qt5 | = poppler-qt5-21.11.0: Success [02:13:53] [03] [00:04:54] Finished devel/qt5-uitools | = qt5-uitools-5.15.2_1: Success [02:15:56] [01] [00:04:03] Finished devel/qt5-assistant | = qt5-assistant-5.15.2: Success [02:24:43] [04] [00:17:32] Finished x11-toolkits/qt5-declarative | = qt5-declarative-5.15.2_4: Success [02:24:44] [01] [00:00:00] Building devel/qt5-designer | = qt5-designer-5.15.2_1 [02:24:44] [02] [00:00:00] Building multimedia/gstreamer1-qt | = gstreamer1-qt5-1.2.0_25 [02:24:44] [03] [00:00:00] Building multimedia/qt5-multimedia | = qt5-multimedia-5.15.2_3 [02:30:21] [02] [00:05:37] Finished multimedia/gstreamer1-qt | = gstreamer1-qt5-1.2.0_25: Success [02:31:28] [03] [00:06:44] Finished multimedia/qt5-multimedia | = qt5-multimedia-5.15.2_3: Success [02:33:32] [01] [00:08:48] Finished devel/qt5-designer | = qt5-designer-5.15.2_1: Success [02:33:33] [01] [00:00:00] Building devel/qt5-linguist | = qt5-linguist-5.15.2 [02:36:32] [01] [00:02:59] Finished devel/qt5-linguist | = qt5-linguist-5.15.2: Success [02:36:32] [01] [00:00:00] Building deskutils/lumina-fm | = lumina-fm-1.6.0_1 [02:36:32] [02] [00:00:00] Building deskutils/lumina-fileinfo | = lumina-fileinfo-1.6.0_1 [02:36:32] [03] [00:00:00] Building deskutils/lumina-calculator | = lumina-calculator-1.6.0_1 [02:36:32] [04] [00:00:00] Building x11/lumina-coreutils | = lumina-coreutils-1.6.0 [02:36:32] [05] [00:00:00] Building deskutils/lumina-mediaplayer | = lumina-mediaplayer-1.6.0_1 [02:36:32] [06] [00:00:00] Building deskutils/lumina-archiver | = lumina-archiver-1.6.0_1 [02:36:32] [07] [00:00:00] Building deskutils/lumina-pdf | = lumina-pdf-1.6.0_22 [02:36:32] [08] [00:00:00] Building deskutils/lumina-photo | = lumina-photo-1.6.0_1 [02:36:32] [09] [00:00:00] Building deskutils/lumina-textedit | = lumina-textedit-1.6.0_1 [02:36:33] [10] [00:00:00] Building x11/lumina-core | = lumina-core-1.6.0_1 [02:36:33] [11] [00:00:00] Building deskutils/lumina-screenshot | = lumina-screenshot-1.6.0_1 [02:38:47] [03] [00:02:15] Finished deskutils/lumina-calculator | = lumina-calculator-1.6.0_1: Success [02:40:20] [09] [00:03:48] Finished deskutils/lumina-textedit | = lumina-textedit-1.6.0_1: Success [02:40:22] [08] [00:03:50] Finished deskutils/lumina-photo | = lumina-photo-1.6.0_1: Success [02:40:24] [11] [00:03:51] Finished deskutils/lumina-screenshot | = lumina-screenshot-1.6.0_1: Success [02:40:52] [07] [00:04:20] Finished deskutils/lumina-pdf | = lumina-pdf-1.6.0_22: Success [02:41:12] [06] [00:04:40] Finished deskutils/lumina-archiver | = lumina-archiver-1.6.0_1: Success [02:41:15] [02] [00:04:43] Finished deskutils/lumina-fileinfo | = lumina-fileinfo-1.6.0_1: Success [02:41:28] [01] [00:04:56] Finished deskutils/lumina-fm | = lumina-fm-1.6.0_1: Success [02:41:57] [04] [00:05:25] Finished x11/lumina-coreutils | = lumina-coreutils-1.6.0: Success [02:43:08] [10] [00:06:36] Finished x11/lumina-core | = lumina-core-1.6.0_1: Success [02:43:23] [05] [00:06:51] Finished deskutils/lumina-mediaplayer | = lumina-mediaplayer-1.6.0_1: Success [02:43:24] [01] [00:00:00] Building x11/lumina | lumina-1.6.0,3 [02:45:59] [01] [00:02:35] Finished x11/lumina | lumina-1.6.0,3: Success [02:46:00] Stopping 16 builders [02:46:27] Creating pkg repository Creating repository in /tmp/packages: 100% Packing files for repository: 100% [02:46:37] Committing packages to repository: = /usr/local/poudriere/data/packages/13_0R-CA7-default/.real_1637015937 = via .latest symlink [02:46:37] Removing old packages [02:46:37] Built ports: devel/llvm12 graphics/mesa-dri = x11-servers/xorg-server x11-drivers/xf86-video-scfb = x11-drivers/xf86-video-vesa x11-drivers/xf86-input-libinput = x11/xorg-minimal x11-toolkits/qt5-gui x11/qt5-x11extras = graphics/qt5-imageformats devel/llvm13 x11-toolkits/qt5-widgets = x11-toolkits/qt5-uiplugin graphics/qt5-svg devel/qt5-help = print/qt5-printsupport graphics/qt5-opengl graphics/poppler-qt5 = devel/qt5-uitools devel/qt5-assistant x11-toolkits/qt5-declarative = multimedia/gstreamer1-qt multimedia/qt5-multimedia devel/qt5-designer = devel/qt5-linguist deskutils/lumina-calculator deskutils/lumina-textedit = deskutils/lumina-photo deskutils/lumina-screenshot deskutils/lumina-pdf = deskutils/lumina-archiver deskutils/lumina-fileinfo deskutils/lumina-fm = x11/lumina-coreutils x11/lumina-core deskutils/lumina-mediaplayer = x11/lumina . . . For reference: # poudriere version poudriere-git-3.3.99.20211017_2 # uname -apKU FreeBSD CA72_16Gp_ZFS 14.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 14.0-CURRENT #19 = main-n250667-20aa359773be-dirty: Sun Nov 14 02:57:32 PST 2021 = root@CA72_16Gp_ZFS:/usr/obj/BUILDs/main-CA72-nodbg-clang/usr/main-src/arm6= 4.aarch64/sys/GENERIC-NODBG-CA72 arm64 aarch64 1400042 1400042 # poudriere jail -j13_0R-CA7 -i Jail name: 13_0R-CA7 Jail version: 13.0-RELEASE-p5 Jail arch: arm.armv7 Jail method: null Jail mount: /usr/obj/DESTDIRs/13_0R-CA7-poud Jail fs: =20 Jail updated: 2021-11-04 01:48:49 Jail pkgbase: disabled (So a 32-bit COMPAT use.) =3D=3D=3D Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away in early 2018-Mar) From nobody Tue Nov 16 06:14:23 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14B031899C69 for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 06:14:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mi+ports@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from symbion.zaytman.com (symbion.zaytman.com [64.112.176.10]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "symbion", Issuer "Narawntapu" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HtbPJ3Fxpz3QlH; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 06:14:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mi+ports@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from narawntapu.narawntapu (pool-96-234-76-196.nwrknj.fios.verizon.net [96.234.76.196]) by symbion.zaytman.com (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPS id 1AG6ERsU022811 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 16 Nov 2021 01:14:28 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mi+ports@aldan.algebra.com) X-Authentication-Warning: symbion.zaytman.com: Host pool-96-234-76-196.nwrknj.fios.verizon.net [96.234.76.196] claimed to be narawntapu.narawntapu Received: from [192.168.3.13] (aldan [192.168.3.13]) by narawntapu.narawntapu (8.17.1/8.17.1) with ESMTP id 1AG6ENDA041966; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 01:14:24 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mi+ports@aldan.algebra.com) X-Authentication-Warning: narawntapu.narawntapu: Host aldan [192.168.3.13] claimed to be [192.168.3.13] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------2XOkmYT0x0AmjRu1zbF0vtbZ" Message-ID: Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2021 01:14:23 -0500 List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 From: "Mikhail T." Subject: Re: Regarding port(s) you maintain in FreeBSD ports collection To: Daniel Engberg Cc: "freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG" References: Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: X-DCC-MGTINTERNET-Metrics: narawntapu 1170; bulk rep Body=2 Fuz1=4 Fuz2=4 rep=21% X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=23.7 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00, HTML_MESSAGE,RATWR8_MESSID,SMILEY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.5 (2021-03-20) on narawntapu.narawntapu X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4HtbPJ3Fxpz3QlH X-Spamd-Bar: + Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of mi@aldan.algebra.com has no SPF policy when checking 64.112.176.10) smtp.mailfrom=mi@aldan.algebra.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [1.89 / 15.00]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_SOME(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FREEFALL_USER(0.00)[mi]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; HAS_XAW(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[algebra.com]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(1.00)[1.000]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.99)[0.994]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; ASN(0.00)[asn:394548, ipnet:64.112.176.0/24, country:US]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[ports]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[96.234.76.196:received] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: Y This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------2XOkmYT0x0AmjRu1zbF0vtbZ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 13.11.21 15:51, Daniel Engberg wrote: > > I agree that old doesn't necessarily mean it's useless > Noted! > however we do need to prune the ports from time to time > Why? Why do we need to "prune the ports from time to time"? I'm aware of one principle, under which a port can be deleted: the port remains broken for "too long". And even that principle is a little vague -- because "too long" is undetermined. Not even having security problems is automatic grounds for removal -- or www/chromium would've been gone long ago :-) VuXML can (should!) flag the security flaw(s), but whether or not to use the port should be up to the user. > a lot of these eats resources simply because they're not maintained in > our tree, upstream > Are you saying, resources are "eaten" because a port is not maintained upstream?! The worst resource-hogs currently are the LLVM, Rust (which, bizarrely, continues to build its own LLVM!), and webkits. All are actively maintained... > > and/or arguably may be seen as bad practice (depending on port) and so on. > I haven't seen any argument suggesting a "bad practice"... What are you referring to? > Generally speaking it's also next to impossible to evaluate every > single port for runtime testing and improve the situation doesn't > improve when where are no "active" users. > This is difficult to parse, but you seem to mean, the ports you nominated for removal have no active ("active"?) users... How do you know this? > > I fully understand that this may not be in agreement with everyone and > we're open for discussion but simply hoarding ports / having a > "software museum" has been deemed to be not the way to go in agreement > with portmgr. It's a balancing act and I did look at other repos to > get a better grasp of ports I'm not all that familiar with. > Here you're implying authority of a portmgr -- are you a member? (Apologies for my being behind the staff appointments.) Yet, even portmgr should not be removing ports based on such vague arguments, whatever they "deem to be not". That body maintains the ports framework -- for them to declare certain ports less equal than others is an overreach... Though their Charter grants them fairly wide authority, their stated goal is "to ensure that the FreeBSD Ports Developer community provides a ports collection that is functional, stable, up-to-date and full-featured". Removing ports -- other than for failing to build -- does not serve any of the enumerated objectives. Indeed, such removals violate the "full featured" part! Frankly, I don't see anything wrong with a "software museum" -- anything, which a human being has once ported to FreeBSD, should remain ported (unless it breaks irreparably). Newer versions may, of course, push out the older ones, but that's about it... > My reasoning regarding beecrypt was also based upon the fact that it's > no longer a port of many repos > Why is this relevant? Is FreeBSD being driven -- governed! -- by other "repos" (whatever that term means)? Is games/bsdgames found in any of those? > > There are no users except btcheck (optional and not enabled by > default) in tree > I can't help, but notice your shifting of the goal posts here. After conceding, that "old does not mean useless", you changed the argument for removal of beecrypt from "it is old" to "it is not used by other ports". And this new one is not a valid argument either... There are no users of www/firefox in tree. Why is this relevant? It is a library -- for all you know, there may be multiple users with their own projects, that uses that library, why remove it, if it is not broken? Must a port providing a software library be used by other ports? I'm unaware of any rule mandating this, are you? If you're not, why did you bring this up? > Regarding www/websh its status is not going to change in agreement > with portmgr, > Here you're once again channeling portmgr. "Its status is not going to change," -- this is a tone of ruler condescending to speak to a subject... Are you alluding to some unpublished policy of portmgr? Because nothing of the kind is listed among the published ones: https://www.freebsd.org/portmgr/policies/ > it's obsolete and marked as dead upstream. First of all, once again, I don't consider "obsolete" and "dead upstream" to be sufficient reasons for removal of a port. But even if they were, this does not apply to websh. The "obsolete" part is simply not true -- websh is just as good as it was, when the last release was made. Tcl-8.6 remains the last release of the interpreter, and the port builds against the latest Apache. It also works (nicely) -- I use it on my own server. I intend to add patches to ensure, the port builds with Tcl-8.7 as well. Maybe, this will make me the new "upstream" -- I hope, you don't mind... > If you still want to keep obsolete software available as packages > In my opinion, people using packages should be using RPMs. The strength and the attraction of BSD in general, and FreeBSD-ports in particular is that everything builds /from source/ -- easily. But that's a different topic, let's not go off tangent... > I suggest that you look into the overlay functionality for ports using > Poudriere. My involvement with FreeBSD predates Poudriere by over a decade -- I hope, you don't imply, using the tool is mandatory for committers or users... Yours, -mi --------------2XOkmYT0x0AmjRu1zbF0vtbZ-- From nobody Tue Nov 16 10:34:45 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14E1E18928C9 for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 10:34:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@ohreally.nl) Received: from rambler.ohreally.nl (rambler.ohreally.nl [51.15.8.63]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Htj9Q64hXz4bmn; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 10:34:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@ohreally.nl) Received: from authenticated-user by rambler.ohreally.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BE10D1D77A90; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 11:34:26 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ohreally.nl; s=dkim; t=1637058867; r=y; bh=HQWRIemQkTPYHiYwS6AblZC8DvL+Ehz0y5KB1c9j9ZE=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=TE+IEJzibp6kCdjFQBvgcCdvfzVrveBWbscK6faeUuGO72Ui8q/pZ6D2/bJigRymZ wXm5zM3GS1BWfQbR17WziPlHNPiVC0MM63u52XMDyybbIi+VpZa4NIICoJMEj8CBT7 B/WWEVQmW24tuqCSe6nr4+xWHsvbl/GoWsd/moK8= Message-ID: <564fc06c-563e-a295-71f3-968a4acf08bb@ohreally.nl> Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2021 11:34:45 +0100 List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Adding functionality to a port Content-Language: en-US To: Guido Falsi Cc: "freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org" References: <4ca51765-b556-3f12-5809-5aadbf6dccca@ohreally.nl> <480b44f5-0674-e645-8413-a1a368cfc393@ohreally.nl> <455ffbd8-2406-7c75-718c-759da5bab52c@ohreally.nl> <0415769b-ac3d-86d0-54c4-1f0a74db0b13@FreeBSD.org> From: Rob LA LAU In-Reply-To: <0415769b-ac3d-86d0-54c4-1f0a74db0b13@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.104.0 at rambler.ohreally.nl X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Htj9Q64hXz4bmn X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=ohreally.nl header.s=dkim header.b=TE+IEJzi; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of freebsd@ohreally.nl designates 51.15.8.63 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=freebsd@ohreally.nl X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.10 / 15.00]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[ohreally.nl:s=dkim]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[ohreally.nl]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.38)[0.377]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[ohreally.nl:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.98)[-0.980]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:12876, ipnet:51.15.0.0/17, country:FR]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N Hi, On 15/11/2021 10:21, Guido Falsi wrote: > You look too worried by the "functionality added" part. Yes, I am worried. Of course I am. When I first asked my question the day before yesterday, the first responses were in the line of "port maintainers can do whatever they want", accompanied by emoticons with sunglasses. So that kind of makes me wonder how seriously FreeBSD takes itself, as an OS. I understand very well that a startup script or similar stuff can be added without any problem. But what worries me, is that apparently there are no limits or rules whatsoever. Even OpenBSD, if you want to keep it close to home, dictates that all patches, work-arounds and dependencies must be documented, and that all changes must be sent upstream to try and have them included in the original work. [1] (And when I say 'Even OpenBSD' I don't mean to say that OpenBSD is any less than FreeBSD, but just that it could be considered a small player, compared to FreeBSD or most other OSes.) I run real servers, so as a sysadmin I want to be able to rely on the fact that the software I install does exactly what is advertised in the upstream documentation, no more and no less. And that's not just from a point of view of security for just me. I run 2 Tor relays, so it's potentially the security of many more people (where 'security' could mean a way bigger risk than just losing some files). And yes, I am sure that Tor runs as advertised, because I verified that (as far as I could). But what if the port maintainer of some obscure library, that is installed through some bizarre chain of dependencies, managed to sneak in a backdoor that gives them root access to my server? Then the security of my Tor installation is no longer relevant, because an attacker can just gain root and compromise that installation. And please don't tell me that that would be illegal, because the amount of attempts I receive on my servers every day tells me that not everybody is as law abiding as you apparently are. Apart from that, triggered by this email conversation, I studied some open source licenses in the past days. And apart from the BSD licenses, MIT license and Mozilla Public License, most open source licenses require modifications to at least be well documented (GPLv2, article 2.a; GPLv3, article 5.a; Apache License, article 4.2; LGPLv2, article 2.b; CDDL-1.0, article 3.3). Which means that even the added startup scripts should carry a notice saying something like "This file is not part of the original distribution, but was added for FreeBSD - ". So if you want to talk about legal stuff: current practice may violate some licenses. I really understand that not everything can be cast in stone. And I understand that there must be some freedom for port maintainers. And I don't want to be a Karen about it either. I am even rather pro-anarchy. But not on the servers that keep my data and that of others secure. I'm just looking for some guarantees for me and my users. I understand that 100% guarantee is hard, if not impossible, but I would like it to be a bit more than "You just shouldn't do bad things.". But I understand that I'm alone in this: only 3 or 4 people have responded, and they all seemed to be very much against any rules for port maintainers. So I won't insist any more. Best, Rob [1] https://www.openbsd.org/faq/ports/guide.html -- https://www.librobert.net/ https://www.ohreally.nl/category/nerd-stuff/ https://github.com/ohreally/ From nobody Tue Nov 16 10:52:35 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D68E189C68B for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 10:52:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from madpilot@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::24b:4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HtjZG0qX4z4j4R; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 10:52:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from madpilot@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [172.24.42.13] (host-79-51-17-182.retail.telecomitalia.it [79.51.17.182]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: madpilot/mail) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A85B22F13E; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 10:52:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from madpilot@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2021 11:52:35 +0100 List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.3.1 Subject: Re: Adding functionality to a port Content-Language: en-US To: Rob LA LAU Cc: "freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org" References: <4ca51765-b556-3f12-5809-5aadbf6dccca@ohreally.nl> <480b44f5-0674-e645-8413-a1a368cfc393@ohreally.nl> <455ffbd8-2406-7c75-718c-759da5bab52c@ohreally.nl> <0415769b-ac3d-86d0-54c4-1f0a74db0b13@FreeBSD.org> <564fc06c-563e-a295-71f3-968a4acf08bb@ohreally.nl> From: Guido Falsi In-Reply-To: <564fc06c-563e-a295-71f3-968a4acf08bb@ohreally.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N On 16/11/21 11:34, Rob LA LAU wrote: > Hi, > > On 15/11/2021 10:21, Guido Falsi wrote: >> You look too worried by the "functionality added" part. > > Yes, I am worried. Of course I am. Now I feel compelled to reply to all this rant of yours because you are replying to me, but I really have little more to say about this. While the first reply you got was on the line of "anything goes" I argued there are some rules, and explained that it's difficult to create better rules. That they can be counter productive. The argument about requiring upstream patches has its problems, but I will not delve into it. Please note that if a maintainer diverges significantly from upstream, committers will intervene, if committers diverge significantly, they will be addressed and the issue discussed. things like this have happened in the past. I personally have refused patches diverging from upstream in the past. The FreeBSD ports collection is a volunteer effort at porting software, we do try to make it behave like upstream, but I don't think there is any way to warrant that. everything is open and there for you to review. there is no hidden patching. Nothing forces you to use packages or ports. You can compile upstream software yourself. You can't expect many warranties from free work of others. Our rules are available for all to see in the porter's handbook and the committer's handbook. I am unable to invent better rules about this than what we already have and are doing. If you think you can write them and propose them. Expecting us to create a set of rules for your real servers with real data and do that for free is not very reasonable. I think this thread has exhausted its usefulness. NOTE I'm writing this from my @FreeBSD.org address so it does not bounce from the mailing list, but this is all my personal opinion. -- Guido Falsi From nobody Tue Nov 16 10:56:27 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B35C4189CBD5 for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 10:56:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@opsec.eu) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Htjfs4hGWz4jlT; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 10:56:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@opsec.eu) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.94.2 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1mmw8Z-000KBe-7t; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 11:56:27 +0100 Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2021 11:56:27 +0100 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Rob LA LAU Cc: Guido Falsi , "freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org" Subject: Re: Adding functionality to a port Message-ID: References: <455ffbd8-2406-7c75-718c-759da5bab52c@ohreally.nl> <0415769b-ac3d-86d0-54c4-1f0a74db0b13@FreeBSD.org> <564fc06c-563e-a295-71f3-968a4acf08bb@ohreally.nl> List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <564fc06c-563e-a295-71f3-968a4acf08bb@ohreally.nl> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Htjfs4hGWz4jlT X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-Spam: Yes X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N Hi! > On 15/11/2021 10:21, Guido Falsi wrote: > > You look too worried by the "functionality added" part. > > Yes, I am worried. Of course I am. > When I first asked my question the day before yesterday, the first > responses were in the line of "port maintainers can do whatever they > want", accompanied by emoticons with sunglasses. At least I did not understand your question as a topic on security, but rather on: What are the rules for a port... -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 Now what ? From nobody Tue Nov 16 13:23:49 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1494F18A698C for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 13:23:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from madpilot@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::24b:4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Htmwk75Yvz4bBy; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 13:23:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from madpilot@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [172.24.42.13] (host-79-51-17-182.retail.telecomitalia.it [79.51.17.182]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: madpilot/mail) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6D26C498; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 13:23:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from madpilot@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <42741ba6-22b1-bb61-e8a7-a58b8242e586@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2021 14:23:49 +0100 List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.3.1 Subject: Re: Adding functionality to a port Content-Language: en-US To: Kurt Jaeger , Rob LA LAU Cc: "freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org" References: <455ffbd8-2406-7c75-718c-759da5bab52c@ohreally.nl> <0415769b-ac3d-86d0-54c4-1f0a74db0b13@FreeBSD.org> <564fc06c-563e-a295-71f3-968a4acf08bb@ohreally.nl> From: Guido Falsi In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N On 16/11/21 11:56, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > Hi! > >> On 15/11/2021 10:21, Guido Falsi wrote: >>> You look too worried by the "functionality added" part. >> >> Yes, I am worried. Of course I am. >> When I first asked my question the day before yesterday, the first >> responses were in the line of "port maintainers can do whatever they >> want", accompanied by emoticons with sunglasses. > > At least I did not understand your question as a topic on security, > but rather on: What are the rules for a port... > Security is important, but if security is at stake we need more detailed info, we need "actionable" information. As I said startup and periodic scripts are and should be installed disabled, if he found a port/package installing a startup script/periodic script auto enabling itself, he should report that and it should be fixed. If there is a broken script it should be fixed. If there is some malicious script that should not happen, committers should and do review submissions to avoid such things. Mistakes can happen, please report and make it noticed and it will be discussed/fixed. If there is some more obscure patch to some source code causing significant behaviour changes in some package, please report it, as usual make you noticed and it will be at least discussed, if it has security implications I'm sure also acted upon effectively. If no security implication is involved there is also less urgency. If we're talking security there is no grey area, the concept is clearly defined and things will be acted upon, there is no need for new rules or philosophy. -- Guido Falsi From nobody Tue Nov 16 15:54:10 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31BC51851A2C for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 15:54:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from byshenknet@byshenk.net) Received: from v1.leiden.byshenk.net (v1.leiden.byshenk.net [37.97.209.179]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HtrGN0Pslz4RGq for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 15:54:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from byshenknet@byshenk.net) Received: by v1.leiden.byshenk.net (Postfix, from userid 1002) id 4F8C375934; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 16:54:10 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2021 16:54:10 +0100 From: Gregory Byshenk To: "freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org" Cc: Rob LA LAU Subject: Re: Adding functionality to a port Message-ID: References: <455ffbd8-2406-7c75-718c-759da5bab52c@ohreally.nl> <0415769b-ac3d-86d0-54c4-1f0a74db0b13@FreeBSD.org> <564fc06c-563e-a295-71f3-968a4acf08bb@ohreally.nl> List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <564fc06c-563e-a295-71f3-968a4acf08bb@ohreally.nl> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4HtrGN0Pslz4RGq X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 11:34:45AM +0100, Rob LA LAU wrote: > Yes, I am worried. Of course I am. > When I first asked my question the day before yesterday, the first > responses were in the line of "port maintainers can do whatever they > want", accompanied by emoticons with sunglasses. > So that kind of makes me wonder how seriously FreeBSD takes itself, as > an OS. I am just a user, but my understanding is that FreeBSD developers take the OS very seriously, but do not take themselves too seriously. > And yes, I am sure that Tor runs as advertised, because I verified that > (as far as I could). But what if the port maintainer of some obscure > library, that is installed through some bizarre chain of dependencies, > managed to sneak in a backdoor that gives them root access to my server? > Then the security of my Tor installation is no longer relevant, because > an attacker can just gain root and compromise that installation. The question you need to answer is "what RULE would prevent this from happening?" My proposed answer is "none can". The only thing that can prevent malicious code injection is actual review of the code, to ensure that it does what it says on the label. This is (as I understand it) part of the job of reviewers and committers. > I really understand that not everything can be cast in stone. And I > understand that there must be some freedom for port maintainers. And I > don't want to be a Karen about it either. I am even rather pro-anarchy. > But not on the servers that keep my data and that of others secure. I'm > just looking for some guarantees for me and my users. I understand that > 100% guarantee is hard, if not impossible, but I would like it to be a > bit more than "You just shouldn't do bad things.". There are no guarantees in this world, especially when it comes to sofware. You may have noticed that even commrecial software usually includes explicit rejection of any 'guarantee'. More importantly, no "rule" can provide such a thing. > But I understand that I'm alone in this: only 3 or 4 people have > responded, and they all seemed to be very much against any rules for > port maintainers. So I won't insist any more. I think the majority of developers and users feel that the porting guidelines are reasonable as they currently exist, when combined with the judgment of commiters and portmgr. Trying to make things more explicit just makes the process more complicated, and - as I note above - doesn't actually solve any problem. -- gregory byshenk - freebsd@byshenk.net - Leiden, NL From nobody Tue Nov 16 16:42:00 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C1C21898BF6 for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 16:42:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tijl@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [96.47.72.83]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HtsKY6slQz4hMQ; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 16:42:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tijl@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2a02:a03f:894b:4700:39e5:c389:ae0c:4689]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: tijl) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2872E1D9E; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 16:42:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tijl@FreeBSD.org) Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2021 17:42:00 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?VMSzbA==?= Coosemans To: Mark Millard Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: automake config failure for autoconf test failure (poudriere based build activity) Message-ID: <20211116174200.7f7d76ce@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <9CAF2D2A-6C52-4584-AA63-C42B7921BF43@yahoo.com> References: <9CAF2D2A-6C52-4584-AA63-C42B7921BF43.ref@yahoo.com> <9CAF2D2A-6C52-4584-AA63-C42B7921BF43@yahoo.com> List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N On Sun, 14 Nov 2021 17:57:23 -0800 Mark Millard wrote: > poudriere output: > > [00:24:23] [09] [00:01:20] Saved devel/automake | automake-1.16.4 wrkdir to: /usr/local/poudriere/data/wrkdirs/13_0R-CA72-default/default/automake-1.16.4.tbz > [00:24:23] [09] [00:01:20] Finished devel/automake | automake-1.16.4: Failed: configure > . . . > > logs/errors/automake-1.16.4.log : > > . . . > checking whether autoconf is installed... yes > checking whether autoconf works... no > configure: error: The installed version of autoconf does not work. > Please check config.log for error messages before this one. > ===> Script "configure" failed unexpectedly. > Please report the problem to tijl@FreeBSD.org [maintainer] and attach the > "/wrkdirs/usr/ports/devel/automake/work/automake-1.16.4/config.log" including > the output of the failure of your make command. Also, it might be a good idea > to provide an overview of all packages installed on your system (e.g. a > /usr/local/sbin/pkg-static info -g -Ea). > *** Error code 1 > > Stop. > make: stopped in /usr/ports/devel/automake > =>> Cleaning up wrkdir > ===> Cleaning for automake-1.16.4 > build of devel/automake | automake-1.16.4 ended at Sun Nov 14 17:01:21 PST 2021 > build time: 00:01:09 > !!! build failure encountered !!! > > > work/automake-1.16.4/config.log : > > . . . > configure:3650: checking whether autoconf is installed > configure:3656: autoconf --version > autoconf (GNU Autoconf) 2.69 > Copyright (C) 2012 Free Software Foundation, Inc. > License GPLv3+/Autoconf: GNU GPL version 3 or later > , > This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it. > There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law. > > Written by David J. MacKenzie and Akim Demaille. > configure:3659: $? = 0 > configure:3667: result: yes > configure:3674: checking whether autoconf works > configure:3684: cd conftest && autoconf -o /dev/null conftest.ac > gm4:/usr/local/share/autoconf-2.69/autoconf/autoconf.m4f:1: expecting character `V' in frozen file > autom4te-2.69: /usr/local/bin/gm4 failed with exit status: 1 > configure:3687: $? = 1 > configure:3696: result: no > configure:3700: error: The installed version of autoconf does not work. > Please check config.log for error messages before this one. > . . . > > > For reference: > > # uname -apKU > FreeBSD CA72_16Gp_ZFS 14.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 14.0-CURRENT #19 main-n250667-20aa359773be-dirty: Sun Nov 14 02:57:32 PST 2021 root@CA72_16Gp_ZFS:/usr/obj/BUILDs/main-CA72-nodbg-clang/usr/main-src/arm64.aarch64/sys/GENERIC-NODBG-CA72 arm64 aarch64 1400042 1400042 > > # cd /usr/ports/ > # ~/fbsd-based-on-what-commit.sh > branch: main > merge-base: 057c0c3c0645c0b237bb2a96dda440e0426ca983 > merge-base: CommitDate: 2021-11-14 23:41:22 +0000 > 057c0c3c0645 (HEAD -> main, freebsd/main, freebsd/HEAD) [NEW] security/snowflake-tor: Pluggable Transport using WebRTC inspired by Flashproxy > n566061 (--first-parent --count for merge-base) > > > Note(s): > > My amd64 FreeBSD context using the same sources (by content) did not > have this problem. That's a strange error. Maybe try to rebuild m4 and autoconf packages. On the FreeBSD package build cluster it builds fine. Here's the log from today: http://ampere2.nyi.freebsd.org/data/main-arm64-default/latest-per-pkg/automake-1.16.4.log From nobody Tue Nov 16 16:59:53 2021 X-Original-To: ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6ED9D185144E for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 17:00:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@quinteiro.org) Received: from mx2.quinteiro.org (mx2.quinteiro.org [71.19.154.200]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HtskB0k6kz4p33 for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 17:00:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@quinteiro.org) Received: from www.quinteiro.org (www.quinteiro.org [204.109.56.22]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx2.quinteiro.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A059F21D9A6 for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 16:59:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@quinteiro.org) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=quinteiro.org; s=default; t=1637081995; bh=kAjS/QFMLdmNUZunUx3/qD9Xu7JVxxWMDCzCP5N52H8=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=a+4kaK+TTEXE/YkjvMHmz+HBUmO8ShTuF2iUToGmhpDCh8kqnPwNaf2wZsaex8VwI SP+m9JriFMFhJH+ZpNwVbZFL/b39Q+aWLKgvFkcyJ3c/NOS5KfcaPg/CtM+KP7131d W+/xql/Mmu/jKjhDNMCoBAd2ITrlA3Pm6EZ7bvNs= Received: from [172.16.1.157] (198-27-223-129.fiber.dynamic.sonic.net [198.27.223.129]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by www.quinteiro.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6AF3E2ED4D for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 16:59:54 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: Adding functionality to a port To: ports@freebsd.org References: <4ca51765-b556-3f12-5809-5aadbf6dccca@ohreally.nl> <480b44f5-0674-e645-8413-a1a368cfc393@ohreally.nl> <455ffbd8-2406-7c75-718c-759da5bab52c@ohreally.nl> <0415769b-ac3d-86d0-54c4-1f0a74db0b13@FreeBSD.org> <564fc06c-563e-a295-71f3-968a4acf08bb@ohreally.nl> From: Jose Quinteiro Message-ID: Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2021 08:59:53 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0 List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <564fc06c-563e-a295-71f3-968a4acf08bb@ohreally.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4HtskB0k6kz4p33 X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=quinteiro.org header.s=default header.b=a+4kaK+T; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of freebsd@quinteiro.org designates 71.19.154.200 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=freebsd@quinteiro.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.50 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[quinteiro.org:s=default]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[ports@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[quinteiro.org]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(1.00)[1.000]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[quinteiro.org:+]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:47066, ipnet:71.19.154.0/24, country:US]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N On 11/16/21 2:34 AM, Rob LA LAU wrote: > ...Even OpenBSD, if you want to keep it close to home, dictates > that all patches, work-arounds and dependencies must be documented, and > that all changes must be sent upstream to try and have them included in > the original work... Openbsd packages come with the following caveat: "The ports collection does not go through the same thorough security audit that is performed on the OpenBSD base system. Although we strive to keep the quality of the packages high, we just do not have enough resources to ensure the same level of robustness and security." https://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq15.html Thanks, Jose From nobody Tue Nov 16 17:28:43 2021 X-Original-To: ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C3581892DE4 for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 17:28:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@ohreally.nl) Received: from rambler.ohreally.nl (rambler.ohreally.nl [51.15.8.63]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HttLy3VYyz3JrX for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 17:28:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@ohreally.nl) Received: from authenticated-user by rambler.ohreally.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DD6481D77A90; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 18:28:24 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ohreally.nl; s=dkim; t=1637083705; r=y; bh=yi/G+h0zLVva9bi3/m5S78fwcR2NwZoYiH2xy2vRA44=; h=Date:Subject:To:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=aRuUUNXCkrAV2GdVO/aPLTUuJ20qO9IAtja0T56TFIq7XU9wfkNPk4DMPpRcnWSg/ lgx+Lxq7mPazLzWvVMH3pk0GcsG9VuUcu7mej5pwXthZCIKBQdZGHB0AF/gU2ttUu9 pd6dyD0qTIgshvXYuOw11Xp0dwPx/SODdPFbp7cE= Message-ID: <0289bf71-db1f-9b65-dc00-fa6bffb3844f@ohreally.nl> Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2021 18:28:43 +0100 List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Adding functionality to a port Content-Language: en-US To: Jose Quinteiro , ports@freebsd.org References: <4ca51765-b556-3f12-5809-5aadbf6dccca@ohreally.nl> <480b44f5-0674-e645-8413-a1a368cfc393@ohreally.nl> <455ffbd8-2406-7c75-718c-759da5bab52c@ohreally.nl> <0415769b-ac3d-86d0-54c4-1f0a74db0b13@FreeBSD.org> <564fc06c-563e-a295-71f3-968a4acf08bb@ohreally.nl> From: Rob LA LAU In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.104.0 at rambler.ohreally.nl X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4HttLy3VYyz3JrX X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N On 16/11/2021 17:59, Jose Quinteiro wrote: > Openbsd packages come with the following caveat: > [...] Every operating system comes with this caveat; OpenBSD just says it out loud. No BSD, nor any Linux distro, has the resources to go through the source code of all ported software, to make sure it has no holes. This responsibility is left with the developers of the software in question. Which is one of the reasons why porters should make as little modifications as possible, and document the modifications they do make: so that it is clear where the developers' responsibilities end and the porters' responsibilities begin (and vice versa). Rob -- https://www.librobert.net/ https://www.ohreally.nl/category/nerd-stuff/ https://github.com/ohreally/ From nobody Tue Nov 16 18:09:23 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25BD71888EAA for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 18:09:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marklmi@yahoo.com) Received: from sonic308-55.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (sonic308-55.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com [98.137.68.31]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HtvGT6CpMz3qcZ for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 18:09:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marklmi@yahoo.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1637086171; bh=pdria93/qN5Lc4qZg2de1AiZ1lpLV/tJ3hjoLqJhPNY=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To:From:Subject:Reply-To; b=N6jlb0Y2R+pbMG1cKtSfld7iXViVEFDSRmPUtsvTlOadkunDAMqeDRiJQL0cEngwQhzZXy3kYAidq9KsXX+qIoHYEKewxGDOLXh34fVcUwTg7nQbTYFac9+4tUmj9dNQFpzKTtV61D3wJjvo4qPHXBH5cY1e3IKg80dA14BHeSs22CRFDk6kE63iWnkIYTG3PyUTLcD/+WRSMYPWOUkD+5ot7H2wFJaZv9NR1Zxz7TM3KtDSrO68b5LWZR/gh/1YjOsDQtSLi6tjGistB0AKwG/kcM9RnTKzjhUAOkxxlrcpBcPeWZfJ6RGqzdItdK4qQNbM1GVNqdMz++TYbWvUJQ== X-SONIC-DKIM-SIGN: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1637086171; bh=Jnv8hcZwzHa+xr1tY5ng9C7tuhhzQfE/Ck+9foKLnHJ=; h=X-Sonic-MF:Subject:From:Date:To:From:Subject; b=alXoTuez5u8yENQOa8OZZIpWDJD31PPkw8tAqaBh+3vctAjuKenAwsVcn19oiVc2xsZOHb/pNTC4lX+pPop+yOOe/8pT9CaaznU5kPd3PHE5gYdVE5nSd4ZQ72ip7AVxc8UXOfD9lbm4WnILaAxCcqYjQMuGOJ0/PMBGI6jBbjg6PUGHbyCPGTAJgwEEZE/228mjCV9eJXs9gR1b8fjIgQozs69B/sTEdGwAQuuycRgNkhtdZBoWL/N4mBOmoMqbm5l4l1g1HzwEeA1i+G55Kmcv02BtwH4sqXymywHs0lTmm2/q/Xb8Z7VtvdU3qFggDU7xRScvpxca9sSZk8M6cw== X-YMail-OSG: TWAfqNIVM1kmJqmuzRckRhqDe.EYBQeUqjxvRS9xe9lAO8MGP7603xAnk8FCopj wK0bfx0dp4OrgExNRt9amVNTcxIDY8sKQUvXUiFasPe9WUXKpr05DnYV8R1oow0waYFnc_U72iN4 6xsQajh6JFdVGFyEo.zkZhNsxicHgxgKTq.iEvBfFlgrObZHZpAHBCR.9EFKROX6tOVvkPAVkvde 4lqpgEbzuH5JxJRdAv7nUGnMgJ_VF91KARUMZeaysNVUCE032Oh85Ujc68M4cPu4x1UCLFMHg1Ez TPOsHT.XNVn79e592kij0JS7P3.M7SCCv8UhrEG1j43rHkJtnXpX0iD3FlpwviGUdVaSw97T95SN ob43QHhR7BrE2dH_7QjmhlA6u48yR1GAk39R5EH3CKbORVSZHgqIuIen4ULnOK8O8hMbcJpW9gYG vJD_BrWHkYhxx8pQCTNuHbYeWlSIDvBsZAAfdevF5_.fWsC2ZC5vTItKlgZWzDGJEt6yvdONUU2h 9KrcWyhIbJ3gHs4LLQs66DnOdJ8mFnd1Xdj_rnIT2F5lFbHBXJlD6aZLSvDP9s6dZVAHEoa57Aql lRLmU2FEUelzkI6n9tGxrN4JvDa6hl6HyZ4slZb7BuEmTiW3KRq8OvF2SirjexN9la17OCqAicnT cctxof_JgkY9XYkrhSuckby92HWllxO7zkGg4pTCFJY0dFf7SXgPtjFcEOh3jp_fZdcwOHoQc_aD FLaCfPYtEuTBGy9XkF5sBBWgQj6bJi9jwoMR7e6cwcV0ErKYW4ga8QN1VEcsLN9N0Wq.w0BQW7EW JgrjAdeDytOjRtsG4w6T7Up9AUB2frN91UjsLWGUY0Bm63lFJscPbjMfux0uwqrMSjKepLqM0PD4 ynuamzc6oZSF.j6Kp5a2x1zzDAeR_L2fqSieiEAjq0OO3hkpZMAiRVfVYUft4f34otPjXug22t_B bFXA6rYpgqDZKeT7hsOJWC2oG7xj8TMz8edRa81iNLKedN5sUkIjeuWknSMEIHqBXj9BBJRKZPUc TtibXLojd2O0Y5.2cSah_eubdj.ip0DQYd.FsmTp35qnVTKXB_K8PF_2PDpHdqZLW6FEmrtoF62T rbRHkTQKAFu7PZpTxNS2ZkkIiCM7ElJGGVFD3ifGpjREgT2Z9LemL5aPXkdXmqCcCEW2lRkDZ6z3 AQV7OJlqzaWDY9.sxkiCRRqK7BUcoGFOL9ahhVWlbH2EmLTskw5D0YTHIF6yCcQ0oWh4PE2NpJWP kvFs5UFiJB2jfmnAaG75I2Kh4J2ew36G7SRNG3LXNNjq9zo2tpTo3wxIH6hxdnqO4zvbzZKfDL7a dXDzCKxkQAqDVNgR70b2_0lQhdNFPQoVivwery.HgJosADht0KcQ.o.VhURt86UaWDlngIzUXms4 XYJa6gPn._9mjFAZtMp_d7T34wpNR_m3ZZQfe6lKga2NtUhAloF_jq0Qo5YLS.HIUf51m.EwqZ7z WRZij.7H5X14H7bDW4e0awNUMuiHzkVNUES2pkmntSF.Yl3vDK51Mpqa0d6O3nHmaJOme.Uy0FDr 7cGT8z6B3iU8dG5VRY7HzNREkhHGu2FQEjA6QNXpEcisc06UI8iQBrxHygP0I7Y5YNas32gz2pgI 3S7LbXP7.Vsg.E5aqrKPqh9SLoitEQ_x63bKhJnfFnlc8cZM1edmnOY3GhTrMGifJesPigwRCemR Z6mkGQlpZ7xIODSB8EB4TJg5yX5jMkPOmYKvuuxUSiCp9qhK3OR2xGGr0FlPXEA_1ADeWjbdq8U9 C4BkV3hYAechcHZXuH3l1ROO9lxjvgbY8100J7VYoKSMr35Zke85hvKzHfvlV1dQ5qodYsk7cPK1 w9_E5ygEuAq8gmh.xjF9YUieDaIzXzUDXJ3ScP.HNsKXnZqfHwMgNoVEBjexOd9CdZy0a00A6BZq hy72jsqv3VaC3rDod9Vqmg7pzxShnZKSqGDZWMOtaCRbwpZtrDk5eQXGh499FFdNiJg4wXpzwPyk WI5CDbsOnw_kotFF1maMom5U2S4YHeu3bEtk7ruwI5DlrpIA8rJKQdrsaM73PJFVC6CA2rR2ytek 0mor6lCKKxtYr1oSvXH5c1X5q1RdsxAn04ChzGjZDhb1NmmLsI00GK6puE_hORo7RvrPAENckJsY ofX_9oHedn0sqREpe_xguI7Fft7FjH4lFZ1bqPUDzAAsTSJiXYqdaWcNVas.aXrMvJlvkOjD05aD 3qDRXsI_VA2GALA0FyL8Yjn5qWYYMkJ6nKI4u1.VfnhuOBCf1xMDn0KRjGiwWoQSmAgd82P8.or4 R1WVFFlVWBU8af8ADSEzKOgo_Nxtn34P5K_qHxyTYsg-- X-Sonic-MF: Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic308.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with HTTP; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 18:09:31 +0000 Received: by kubenode531.mail-prod1.omega.bf1.yahoo.com (VZM Hermes SMTP Server) with ESMTPA ID 7f5e99a3cd3e10ca58c363016d7f6381; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 18:09:26 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.120.0.1.13\)) Subject: Re: automake config failure for autoconf test failure (poudriere based build activity) In-Reply-To: <20211116174200.7f7d76ce@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2021 10:09:23 -0800 Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <42915F8C-C42B-4E22-8D2B-17F86828DEB9@yahoo.com> References: <9CAF2D2A-6C52-4584-AA63-C42B7921BF43.ref@yahoo.com> <9CAF2D2A-6C52-4584-AA63-C42B7921BF43@yahoo.com> <20211116174200.7f7d76ce@FreeBSD.org> To: =?utf-8?Q?T=C4=B3l_Coosemans?= X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.120.0.1.13) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4HtvGT6CpMz3qcZ X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[] Reply-To: marklmi@yahoo.com From: Mark Millard via freebsd-ports X-Original-From: Mark Millard X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N On 2021-Nov-16, at 08:42, T=C4=B3l Coosemans wrote: > On Sun, 14 Nov 2021 17:57:23 -0800 Mark Millard > wrote: >> poudriere output: >>=20 >> [00:24:23] [09] [00:01:20] Saved devel/automake | automake-1.16.4 = wrkdir to: = /usr/local/poudriere/data/wrkdirs/13_0R-CA72-default/default/automake-1.16= .4.tbz >> [00:24:23] [09] [00:01:20] Finished devel/automake | automake-1.16.4: = Failed: configure >> . . . >>=20 >> logs/errors/automake-1.16.4.log : >>=20 >> . . . >> checking whether autoconf is installed... yes >> checking whether autoconf works... no >> configure: error: The installed version of autoconf does not work. >> Please check config.log for error messages before this one. >> =3D=3D=3D> Script "configure" failed unexpectedly. =20 >> Please report the problem to tijl@FreeBSD.org [maintainer] and attach = the >> "/wrkdirs/usr/ports/devel/automake/work/automake-1.16.4/config.log" = including >> the output of the failure of your make command. Also, it might be a = good idea >> to provide an overview of all packages installed on your system (e.g. = a >> /usr/local/sbin/pkg-static info -g -Ea). >> *** Error code 1 >>=20 >> Stop. >> make: stopped in /usr/ports/devel/automake >> =3D>> Cleaning up wrkdir =20 >> =3D=3D=3D> Cleaning for automake-1.16.4 =20 >> build of devel/automake | automake-1.16.4 ended at Sun Nov 14 = 17:01:21 PST 2021 >> build time: 00:01:09 >> !!! build failure encountered !!! >>=20 >>=20 >> work/automake-1.16.4/config.log : >>=20 >> . . . >> configure:3650: checking whether autoconf is installed >> configure:3656: autoconf --version >> autoconf (GNU Autoconf) 2.69 >> Copyright (C) 2012 Free Software Foundation, Inc. >> License GPLv3+/Autoconf: GNU GPL version 3 or later >> , = >> This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it. >> There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law. >>=20 >> Written by David J. MacKenzie and Akim Demaille. >> configure:3659: $? =3D 0 >> configure:3667: result: yes >> configure:3674: checking whether autoconf works >> configure:3684: cd conftest && autoconf -o /dev/null conftest.ac >> gm4:/usr/local/share/autoconf-2.69/autoconf/autoconf.m4f:1: expecting = character `V' in frozen file >> autom4te-2.69: /usr/local/bin/gm4 failed with exit status: 1 >> configure:3687: $? =3D 1 >> configure:3696: result: no >> configure:3700: error: The installed version of autoconf does not = work. >> Please check config.log for error messages before this one. >> . . . >>=20 >>=20 >> For reference: >>=20 >> # uname -apKU >> FreeBSD CA72_16Gp_ZFS 14.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 14.0-CURRENT #19 = main-n250667-20aa359773be-dirty: Sun Nov 14 02:57:32 PST 2021 = root@CA72_16Gp_ZFS:/usr/obj/BUILDs/main-CA72-nodbg-clang/usr/main-src/arm6= 4.aarch64/sys/GENERIC-NODBG-CA72 arm64 aarch64 1400042 1400042 >>=20 >> # cd /usr/ports/ >> # ~/fbsd-based-on-what-commit.sh=20 >> branch: main >> merge-base: 057c0c3c0645c0b237bb2a96dda440e0426ca983 >> merge-base: CommitDate: 2021-11-14 23:41:22 +0000 >> 057c0c3c0645 (HEAD -> main, freebsd/main, freebsd/HEAD) [NEW] = security/snowflake-tor: Pluggable Transport using WebRTC inspired by = Flashproxy >> n566061 (--first-parent --count for merge-base) >>=20 >>=20 >> Note(s): >>=20 >> My amd64 FreeBSD context using the same sources (by content) did not >> have this problem. >=20 > That's a strange error. Maybe try to rebuild m4 and autoconf = packages. > On the FreeBSD package build cluster it builds fine. Here's the log > from today: > = http://ampere2.nyi.freebsd.org/data/main-arm64-default/latest-per-pkg/auto= make-1.16.4.log On the FreebSD vintage involved, I seem to be getting fairly rare file corruptions during port builds in my aarch64 context. No retry of building a port that contained the corrupted file has produced a corruption in these cases. autoconf turned out to not be the only example: there were two others. (I've did multiple bulk -a runs back in October (for otehr reqsons) without evidence of corruptions. But bulk -a is not something I'd normally do and I did not keep the results. In this context between 400 and 500 port were built in each of 3 poudriere jails. 2 known corruptions in one jail's build, 1 in another, and one with no known corruptions.) So I got past the autoconf/automake problem but I've no clue how to set up a reproducible context for isolating what leads to having a corruption. =3D=3D=3D Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away in early 2018-Mar) From nobody Tue Nov 16 21:25:13 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 532CF18A3F62 for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 21:25:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dave@horsfall.org) Received: from nsstlmta05p.bpe.bigpond.com (nsstlmta05p.bpe.bigpond.com [203.38.21.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "", Issuer "Openwave Messaging Inc." (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HtzcQ4DwKz4TNH for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 21:25:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dave@horsfall.org) Received: from smtp.telstra.com ([10.10.24.4]) by nsstlfep05p-svc.bpe.nexus.telstra.com.au with ESMTP id <20211116212516.OUUC6094.nsstlfep05p-svc.bpe.nexus.telstra.com.au@smtp.telstra.com> for ; Wed, 17 Nov 2021 08:25:16 +1100 X-RG-Spam: Unknown X-RazorGate-Vade: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvuddrfedvgddugeeiucetufdoteggodetrfdotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuuffpveftpgfvgffnuffvtfetpdfqfgfvnecuuegrihhlohhuthemucegtddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenucfjughrpeffhffvufgjkfhffgggtgesthdttddttdervdenucfhrhhomhepffgrvhgvucfjohhrshhfrghllhcuoegurghvvgeshhhorhhsfhgrlhhlrdhorhhgqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeekieetjeeuuefhfeeguedvudeifeevudfgvedtffekhfffjeekhfdutdetheethfenucfkphepuddutddrudeguddrudelfedrvdeffeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhephhgvlhhopegrnhgvuhhrihhnrdhhohhrshhfrghllhdrohhrghdpihhnvghtpeduuddtrddugedurdduleefrddvfeefpdhmrghilhhfrhhomhepuggrvhgvsehhohhrshhfrghllhdrohhrghdprhgtphhtthhopehfrhgvvggsshguqdhpohhrthhssehfrhgvvggsshgurdhorhhg X-RazorGate-Vade-Verdict: clean 0 X-RazorGate-Vade-Classification: clean X-RG-VS-CLASS: clean Received: from aneurin.horsfall.org (110.141.193.233) by smtp.telstra.com (5.8.716.02) id 611C6CEC127109BC for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Wed, 17 Nov 2021 08:25:16 +1100 Received: from aneurin.horsfall.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by aneurin.horsfall.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 1AGLPEfb038507 for ; Wed, 17 Nov 2021 08:25:14 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from dave@horsfall.org) Received: from localhost (dave@localhost) by aneurin.horsfall.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) with ESMTP id 1AGLPDgf038504 for ; Wed, 17 Nov 2021 08:25:14 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from dave@horsfall.org) X-Authentication-Warning: aneurin.horsfall.org: dave owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2021 08:25:13 +1100 (EST) From: Dave Horsfall To: FreeBSD Ports Subject: Re: Adding functionality to a port In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <455ffbd8-2406-7c75-718c-759da5bab52c@ohreally.nl> <0415769b-ac3d-86d0-54c4-1f0a74db0b13@FreeBSD.org> <564fc06c-563e-a295-71f3-968a4acf08bb@ohreally.nl> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21.9999 (BSF 287 2018-06-16) X-GPG-Public-Key: http://www.horsfall.org/gpgkey.pub X-GPG-Fingerprint: 05B4 FFBC 0218 B438 66E0 587B EF46 7357 EF5E F58B X-Home-Page: http://www.horsfall.org/ X-Witty-Saying: "chmod 666 the_mode_of_the_beast" List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4HtzcQ4DwKz4TNH X-Spamd-Bar: + Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of dave@horsfall.org has no SPF policy when checking 203.38.21.5) smtp.mailfrom=dave@horsfall.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [1.80 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; HAS_XAW(0.00)[]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(1.00)[1.000]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROMTLD(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[horsfall.org]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(1.00)[1.000]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:1221, ipnet:203.36.0.0/14, country:AU]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[203.38.21.5:from] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N On Tue, 16 Nov 2021, Gregory Byshenk wrote: > I am just a user, but my understanding is that FreeBSD developers take > the OS very seriously, but do not take themselves too seriously. Best comment I've seen in this increasingly-sillier thread. -- Dave From nobody Tue Nov 16 21:46:39 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07B261856D92 for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 21:46:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from diizzy@FreeBSD.org) Received: from relay9-d.mail.gandi.net (relay9-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.183.199]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Hv0535PVdz4bmx for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 21:46:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from diizzy@FreeBSD.org) Received: (Authenticated sender: daniel.engberg@pyret.net) by relay9-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 9D4EDFF802; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 21:46:39 +0000 (UTC) List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2021 22:46:39 +0100 From: Daniel Engberg To: "Mikhail T." Cc: "freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG" Subject: Re: Regarding port(s) you maintain in FreeBSD ports collection In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <9524a144672a383530187ed7369acea9@FreeBSD.org> X-Sender: diizzy@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_c50793429dc7233bdd4185153128ad7e" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Hv0535PVdz4bmx X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[ports]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-Spam: Yes X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: Y --=_c50793429dc7233bdd4185153128ad7e Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed On 2021-11-16 07:14, Mikhail T. wrote: > On 13.11.21 15:51, Daniel Engberg wrote: > >> I agree that old doesn't necessarily mean it's useless > > Noted! > >> however we do need to prune the ports from time to time > > Why? Why do we need to "prune the ports from time to time"? I'm aware > of one principle, under which a port can be deleted: the port remains > broken for "too long". And even that principle is a little vague -- > because "too long" is undetermined. > > Not even having security problems is automatic grounds for removal -- > or www/chromium would've been gone long ago :-) VuXML can (should!) > flag the security flaw(s), but whether or not to use the port should be > up to the user. > >> a lot of these eats resources simply because they're not maintained in >> our tree, upstream > Are you saying, resources are "eaten" because a port is not maintained > upstream?! The worst resource-hogs currently are the LLVM, Rust (which, > bizarrely, continues to build its own LLVM!), and webkits. All are > actively maintained... > >> and/or arguably may be seen as bad practice (depending on port) and so >> on. > I haven't seen any argument suggesting a "bad practice"... What are you > referring to? > >> Generally speaking it's also next to impossible to evaluate every >> single port for runtime testing and improve the situation doesn't >> improve when where are no "active" users. > This is difficult to parse, but you seem to mean, the ports you > nominated for removal have no active ("active"?) users... How do you > know this? > >> I fully understand that this may not be in agreement with everyone and >> we're open for discussion but simply hoarding ports / having a >> "software museum" has been deemed to be not the way to go in agreement >> with portmgr. It's a balancing act and I did look at other repos to >> get a better grasp of ports I'm not all that familiar with. > > Here you're implying authority of a portmgr -- are you a member? > (Apologies for my being behind the staff appointments.) Yet, even > portmgr should not be removing ports based on such vague arguments, > whatever they "deem to be not". That body maintains the ports framework > -- for them to declare certain ports less equal than others is an > overreach... Though their Charter [1] grants them fairly wide > authority, their stated goal is "to ensure that the FreeBSD Ports > Developer community provides a ports collection that is functional, > stable, up-to-date and full-featured". Removing ports -- other than for > failing to build -- does not serve any of the enumerated objectives. > Indeed, such removals violate the "full featured" part! > > Frankly, I don't see anything wrong with a "software museum" -- > anything, which a human being has once ported to FreeBSD, should remain > ported (unless it breaks irreparably). Newer versions may, of course, > push out the older ones, but that's about it... > >> My reasoning regarding beecrypt was also based upon the fact that it's >> no longer a port of many repos > Why is this relevant? Is FreeBSD being driven -- governed! -- by other > "repos" (whatever that term means)? Is games/bsdgames found in any of > those? > >> There are no users except btcheck (optional and not enabled by >> default) in tree > > I can't help, but notice your shifting of the goal posts here. After > conceding, that "old does not mean useless", you changed the argument > for removal of beecrypt from "it is old" to "it is not used by other > ports". And this new one is not a valid argument either... > > There are no users of www/firefox in tree. Why is this relevant? It is > a library -- for all you know, there may be multiple users with their > own projects, that uses that library, why remove it, if it is not > broken? > > Must a port providing a software library be used by other ports? I'm > unaware of any rule mandating this, are you? If you're not, why did you > bring this up? > >> Regarding www/websh its status is not going to change in agreement >> with portmgr, > > Here you're once again channeling portmgr. "Its status is not going to > change," -- this is a tone of ruler condescending to speak to a > subject... Are you alluding to some unpublished policy of portmgr? > Because nothing of the kind is listed among the published ones: > >> https://www.freebsd.org/portmgr/policies/ > >> it's obsolete and marked as dead upstream. > First of all, once again, I don't consider "obsolete" and "dead > upstream" to be sufficient reasons for removal of a port. But even if > they were, this does not apply to websh. > The "obsolete" part is simply not true -- websh is just as good as it > was, when the last release was made. Tcl-8.6 remains the last release > of the interpreter, and the port builds against the latest Apache. It > also works (nicely) -- I use it on my own server. > > I intend to add patches to ensure, the port builds with Tcl-8.7 as > well. Maybe, this will make me the new "upstream" -- I hope, you don't > mind... > >> If you still want to keep obsolete software available as packages > > In my opinion, people using packages should be using RPMs. The strength > and the attraction of BSD in general, and FreeBSD-ports in particular > is that everything builds _from source_ -- easily. But that's a > different topic, let's not go off tangent... > >> I suggest that you look into the overlay functionality for ports using >> Poudriere. > > My involvement with FreeBSD predates Poudriere by over a decade -- I > hope, you don't imply, using the tool is mandatory for committers or > users... > > Yours, > >> -mi Hi Mikhail, There are numerous of reason why we need to remove ports, one major reason is simply to have a sustainable repository. One example is the deprecation of Python 2.x which is long overdue but we're slowly getting there because there still are a few crucial pieces of software that depends on it such as Chromium. When upstream decides to drop support it essentially falls into the hands of maintainers of said package(ing) repo to make sure that it builds, runs as expected, perferably have the ability to audit so its safe to use to name a few. Thankfully we have a great community of committers and contributers who engages and helps out with these issues but at some point it's no longer viable and/or little to no benefit. Such decisions like this one are run by several members and portmgr to ensure there's a general agreement and to get feedback in case you've overlooked something that may be of value and listening to community feedback. While it's near impossible to meet everyones expectations its high up on the list to do so however inevitably there will also be disagreement. In this case to be more specific I used Repology (repology.org) as a gauge along with a few other aspects such as its purpose, upstream support and acitivity to evaulate a reasonable course of action which I think is fair. Whether a port is a standalone application or library wasn't something I took into consideration however if one affects multiple of users in tree further evaluation might needed to take into consideration. It is indeed hard to estimate amount of users which is why I reached out on -ports mailinglist and by mail to listed maintainers asking for feedback and a reasonable argument. While there's no hard requirement to use Poudriere it does however speed up the submission process and is a requirement that your port builds using it [1]. The transition to git also makes it possible to maintain your own modifications to the tree easily. [1] https://docs.freebsd.org/en/books/porters-handbook/book/#testing-poudriere Best regards, Daniel Links: ------ [1] https://www.freebsd.org/portmgr/charter/ --=_c50793429dc7233bdd4185153128ad7e-- From nobody Wed Nov 17 07:58:07 2021 X-Original-To: ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 458511899E88 for ; Wed, 17 Nov 2021 07:58:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sobomax@sippysoft.com) Received: from mail-ed1-f41.google.com (mail-ed1-f41.google.com [209.85.208.41]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1D4" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HvFfh6hpGz4bjM for ; Wed, 17 Nov 2021 07:58:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sobomax@sippysoft.com) Received: by mail-ed1-f41.google.com with SMTP id z10so6921843edc.11 for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 23:58:20 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=dSsImfnQok8Ow/f0XAshtDxbeuiLgmVAjy2xtw7BmqA=; b=CtGVK+ECfTXS3q2q9WtP8rlInHmuy2UdeIPUroaSCe9kb6hAmvcW9OQ3PHGmNBxu2u hlOyefxw7gb7MHf2TMl5EMz0NzazBt5/7u/QTz/pdY4/g8uqhrOCND6iS5G/dFNifQ67 xAPo21mwS+FUv+RRv5byiNWQEqAYkJKqOsAzIDhk2jTVmacUBw66i2lxJH8634T44euq n7c7sb0FgcpMwd49jHoMZ8COYV9s4uIzVYvtUYIUfj6jKy/w40ene/8n0lvFpwHJUExk 3rH3fYnYDSRvENVHVT1UfDF/CsVd47E/anTkJvAmi63pSliavjqDJNKgxx7isizju20U yFOw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530d+1DXdc6XG7wcbHDLdJTSvgM5/E3ZFvW8uc8iOQmf97TH3buA zOAMdEPCj7sThUfA5bUrIL/UXEmbqxwHH4wV8jxrGJGOH7w+JQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxxEYzX/t5TIdPRp1bWsuFhfx/Mt4q8+6urutOYUDbqvnuFrRlFSuLphIVDmBFxg+U7NcERqICZEi1Zpl4y7Zw= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:50c6:: with SMTP id h6mr18966396edb.228.1637135899588; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 23:58:19 -0800 (PST) List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Maxim Sobolev Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2021 23:58:07 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Bringing back lang/python27 with few modules? To: ports@freebsd.org, Rene Ladan Cc: portmgr@freebsd.org, python@freebsd.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000be8cad05d0f76765" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4HvFfh6hpGz4bjM X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of sobomax@sippysoft.com designates 209.85.208.41 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=sobomax@sippysoft.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.00 / 15.00]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FREEFALL_USER(0.00)[sobomax]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:209.85.128.0/17]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[ports@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[freebsd.org]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(1.00)[1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[209.85.208.41:from]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[sobomax@freebsd.org,sobomax@sippysoft.com]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[209.85.208.41:from]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:209.85.128.0/17, country:US]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[sobomax@freebsd.org,sobomax@sippysoft.com]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: Y --000000000000be8cad05d0f76765 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hi, I am still a bit concerned with the total removal of python 2.7 year ago and its support, I think this was a somewhat swift decision that may need to be re-considered. I understand the urge for portmgr to move base over to a supported version, but also that caused few important packages to be dropped out of the FreeBSD without any fix in sight. I am specifically talking about the PyPy package, which needs 2.7 to bootstrap itself even when compiled as a "Python3" version. At the same time we still have a port of for example GCC 4.6, which is like what, 15 years old? Also things in the tree like jython or micropython are effectively python 2 implementations, so why are they allowed to be present while not rock solid and field tried 2.7? In fact jython specifically recommends using CPython2.7 to byte-compile some of the code that it cannot chew by itself, so it's somewhat broken as well*. Is there any chance to bring CPython2.7 at the very least as a NO_PACKAGE build tool that could be used for such cases now that we have moved most of the supported packages to 3.x land? I had always considered FreeBSD to be about "tools not policy", but in this particular case the policy seemingly took priority over tools and common sense. Sorry if I am beating a dead horse here, just wanted to gauge the position of the project before I go and open yet another bug report. Thanks! -Max *) Like the following: java.lang.RuntimeException: java.lang.RuntimeException: Encountered too large method code in /usr/ports/lang/pypy/work/pypy3.8-v7.3.7-src/rpython/rlib/unicodedata/unicodedb_6_0_0.py Please provide a CPython 2.7 bytecode file (.pyc) to proceed, e.g. run python -m py_compile /usr/ports/lang/pypy/work/pypy3.8-v7.3.7-src/rpython/rlib/unicodedata/unicodedb_6_0_0.py and try again. Alternatively provide proper CPython 2.7 execute command via cpython_cmd property, e.g. call jython -J-Dcpython_cmd=python or if running pip on Jython: pip install --global-option="-J-Dcpython_cmd=python" *** Error code 255 --000000000000be8cad05d0f76765-- From nobody Wed Nov 17 08:37:07 2021 X-Original-To: ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EFD9188D2BA for ; Wed, 17 Nov 2021 08:37:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sobomax@sippysoft.com) Received: from mail-ed1-f47.google.com (mail-ed1-f47.google.com [209.85.208.47]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1D4" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HvGWn5n58z4nTv for ; Wed, 17 Nov 2021 08:37:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sobomax@sippysoft.com) Received: by mail-ed1-f47.google.com with SMTP id y12so7355896eda.12 for ; Wed, 17 Nov 2021 00:37:25 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=dwn1PFvvkYF6dEK75FW0B8mGPz/2wzdqruXdq59q54o=; b=2IgVV+zqDAVeIdIsdKI147SBrguXVfrGQAy8kVdaudXaUTm4vYhyh4XQO31Nji696r enJ4tYKiNbCVuTmyEIawyG8fcG56uBc+VbWAQQ71DpcEUQ3YQ4ManP3UMQh56aWZch5k CrMH/pGK4vt0qTAsdEyLXA/gav76gLO5mYIpHFOGqF6fiAX2QXDK0NwhD6YuPp+8PnD+ UZaupk7dB40ElfZgc628LzhfXVE9wIi4t5RUac8g45r/C84d82AZjZpV9SmISacfR/mf mrsMcS17Fyr2D7oiSDa44dacuQINGkiqhPPA0f8YgssKU8LZQgKYtEXS3QttaIxb15P8 /mlw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM53360XCcTGf0FyUBR6Pm36QzPWgTcY1mO4FM/SfjyDGkN/xBszVz nSka4qucOjfdnZG6oHk+aSpHE3o5O1gYVJ9meNHfw8Bj3FWmVg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxwNIprsn8OcKrzzBxXRskTnt57rICzeAUD+u/74xQcxzMf4NxX/Ayu7rpUtpwaiZvGzoLA3Y48J80UUkWIv4w= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:455:: with SMTP id p21mr19369696edw.384.1637138239147; Wed, 17 Nov 2021 00:37:19 -0800 (PST) List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Maxim Sobolev Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2021 00:37:07 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Bringing back lang/python27 with few modules? To: ports@freebsd.org, Rene Ladan Cc: portmgr@freebsd.org, python@freebsd.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000003167c905d0f7f33c" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4HvGWn5n58z4nTv X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of sobomax@sippysoft.com designates 209.85.208.47 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=sobomax@sippysoft.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.01 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FREEFALL_USER(0.00)[sobomax]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:209.85.128.0/17:c]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[ports@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[freebsd.org]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(1.00)[1.000]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.99)[-0.992]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[209.85.208.47:from]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[sobomax@freebsd.org,sobomax@sippysoft.com]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[209.85.208.47:from]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:209.85.128.0/17, country:US]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[sobomax@freebsd.org,sobomax@sippysoft.com]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: Y --0000000000003167c905d0f7f33c Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" P.S. AFAIK our documented criteria for removing a port is when one of the following is true: o Port lacks maintaintership; o Port has issues building on supported releases; o Port clearly has no users/use; o Port has some serious security issues. The lang/python27 did not belong to either of those bins, IMHO. --0000000000003167c905d0f7f33c-- From nobody Wed Nov 17 10:16:20 2021 X-Original-To: ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 892F7188DD17; Wed, 17 Nov 2021 10:16:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rene@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [96.47.72.132]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HvJjw3PDzz3rLY; Wed, 17 Nov 2021 10:16:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rene@freebsd.org) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1637144180; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=rOBFEsXsk+iP5K4g/nqoLXSPewXWzFpk7Po+cyp/thk=; b=Nm39zm++Xsgq6PyCs+oEa8VfZy1s/J7+xEZdhLRfYzZ2hjqHQ8mrAhrscu/EPhfww9s49X mVagoWclGG/vaYD4ODsJXwQELIzhoJ5ND3T55oExjhZGHiEZjX3Tc7+imJ6dNHILlsJklp o/H1COieg0zBTW9XidroqlyXQFKdPmlSfey0gQa60dW4q8diN6oS1LBgm0dUcqUMXEE7s+ VI/CSPuCx5j08R0NaBM+IKAFFamBArnGr1TfuxPzsfqrDL2Zv7vKE1q585dir+6UJy5TpW SuTC1T9r/68eKUodreSMI0lsja01gDDjEsLKNm4lquaJPyixkZ5pXVCFyEYt8g== Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1185) id 20B71548A; Wed, 17 Nov 2021 10:16:20 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2021 10:16:20 +0000 From: Rene Ladan To: Maxim Sobolev Cc: ports@freebsd.org, portmgr@freebsd.org, python@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Bringing back lang/python27 with few modules? Message-ID: References: List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1637144180; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=rOBFEsXsk+iP5K4g/nqoLXSPewXWzFpk7Po+cyp/thk=; b=C2ppOx098ZzLrqVktXM+3YqcTJ7PXH0b1N8xG4tRYcZtmL1HV1E8prx72fRWbZGFWhPjJR kY6YbBM7c5k/7L/5IVyeMiVgJ7ZrSWDCXYtJIqmcF0KyYAC3xmYSu5SqSIoB1p1dOWrq6I 1KU9eXiA+yuj05XrGAqyg7mNvzF7YOPGhmegquPdMnma2DrOmOqLjbk2+tMHGNs3mlrW9t rWhW9gr/DbtmepcY9b4/GnhwxqWGomZP8fNNvrC9mFJ5ZlZBen8vNlI70y1IEL0nuF/b0M 65yfqN67YpyzXVZrRfov3eCSHsogQMsMYQDxwCD/WducZ0b8vB7g+0TSUKbJiA== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1637144180; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=Ycowg49HIT4+w29T7rFQtkd2z2jzNbUtX78d2iWwFxCQSp2kNAo1LrLtP2nMassPXQB199 pm5u2btvKk3WQLynZy+Pq0hzzbdrYx5784jUMzG8yJN2n5FNeObNh3ujoms11C0NcaK4le xf1Jrih21xRDDtqkv3mJ4sfUIXxELY6eq8n7CnRnTSadbzfBfb2cWcIeq7b08Do1lnJHJS ULnCQiiNxRVUeopcV/WfDpZWK0jlfVhfrD7VcBL1QnIXwQEVBaBMn+oHLo3zwoin399/ub tIIoeWTzovpgHKwfs9j2yY/m5meI/GYyGcIrLOjMkTOEYaprWU1bdqyv5OtZKg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 12:37:07AM -0800, Maxim Sobolev wrote: > P.S. AFAIK our documented criteria for removing a port is when one of the > following is true: > o Port lacks maintaintership; > o Port has issues building on supported releases; > o Port clearly has no users/use; > o Port has some serious security issues. > > The lang/python27 did not belong to either of those bins, IMHO. "Unmaintained upstream" is also a criterion, and Python 2.7 fits there. Old GCC ports are slowly being phased out too ;) Regards, René From nobody Wed Nov 17 10:40:07 2021 X-Original-To: ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E80C018521DB; Wed, 17 Nov 2021 10:40:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@oldach.net) Received: from nuc.oldach.net (hmo.in-vpn.de [IPv6:2001:67c:1407:60::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "nuc.oldach.net", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HvKFY6pN8z4TTJ; Wed, 17 Nov 2021 10:40:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@oldach.net) Received: from nuc.oldach.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nuc.oldach.net (8.17.1/8.17.1/hmo17dec20) with ESMTPS id 1AHAe7Li017118 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 17 Nov 2021 11:40:07 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@oldach.net) Received: (from hmo@localhost) by nuc.oldach.net (8.17.1/8.17.1/Submit) id 1AHAe7kC017117; Wed, 17 Nov 2021 11:40:07 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@oldach.net) Message-Id: <202111171040.1AHAe7kC017117@nuc.oldach.net> Subject: Re: Bringing back lang/python27 with few modules? In-Reply-To: from Maxim Sobolev at "16 Nov 2021 23:58:07" To: sobomax@freebsd.org (Maxim Sobolev) Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2021 11:40:07 +0100 (CET) Cc: ports@freebsd.org, rene@freebsd.org, portmgr@freebsd.org, python@freebsd.org From: freebsd@oldach.net (Helge Oldach) X-No-Archive: Yes List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: inspected by milter-greylist-4.6.4 (nuc.oldach.net [0.0.0.0]); Wed, 17 Nov 2021 11:40:07 +0100 (CET) for IP:127.0.0.1 DOMAIN:localhost HELO:nuc.oldach.net FROM:freebsd@oldach.net RCPT: X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4HvKFY6pN8z4TTJ X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of freebsd@oldach.net designates 2001:67c:1407:60::1 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=freebsd@oldach.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.27 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[oldach.net]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(1.00)[1.000]; RCPT_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROMTLD(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.97)[-0.968]; FROM_NO_DN(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:29670, ipnet:2001:67c:1400::/45, country:DE]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-Spam: Yes X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N Hi, Maxim Sobolev wrote on Wed, 17 Nov 2021 08:58:07 +0100 (CET): > I am still a bit concerned with the total removal of python 2.7 year ago > and its support, I think this was a somewhat swift decision that may need > to be re-considered. I understand the urge for portmgr to move base over to > a supported version, but also that caused few important packages to be > dropped out of the FreeBSD without any fix in sight. Indeed. Plus, after removal of python27 a couple of ports had been removed as well, for which no python3 equivalent (or any other reasonable alternative that doesn't impose a full compilation of llvm just for building :-)) exists, for example mail/archivemail. I'd love to see these back as well. Kind regards Helge From nobody Wed Nov 17 12:49:33 2021 X-Original-To: ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4762A1899D92; Wed, 17 Nov 2021 12:49:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from SRS0=9sVR=QE=klop.ws=ronald-lists@realworks.nl) Received: from smtp-relay-int.realworks.nl (smtp-relay-int.realworks.nl [194.109.157.24]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HvN6w0kmNz3mGg; Wed, 17 Nov 2021 12:49:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from SRS0=9sVR=QE=klop.ws=ronald-lists@realworks.nl) Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2021 13:49:33 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=klop.ws; s=rw1; t=1637153374; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=mfx5O+zLcPeqFQ872+VRaUVPJyO5vyJ6zeAVhrcugAo=; b=HUpnxkXBZZ6ecwsWnZtmSP5KTVWucBrVfzVR8KA9SSULS5gMGjQ72erJ9qIUCzJp52YEWS O0EZOkC+AdR5yzDw== To: Maxim Sobolev Cc: portmgr@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org, python@freebsd.org, Rene Ladan Message-ID: <1094396681.17.1637153373974@mailrelay> In-Reply-To: References: Subject: Re: Bringing back lang/python27 with few modules? List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_16_1176985807.1637153373960" X-Mailer: Realworks (586.1331.e8df350) Importance: Normal X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4HvN6w0kmNz3mGg X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[] Reply-To: ronald-lists@klop.ws From: Ronald Klop via ports X-Original-From: Ronald Klop X-Spam: Yes X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: Y ------=_Part_16_1176985807.1637153373960 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, Maybe I do not fully understand your mail, but I still have /usr/ports/lang/python27 in my ports tree. And a package is also still available via "pkg install python27". But maybe the modules you are talking about are more of your concern. Regards, Ronald. Van: Maxim Sobolev Datum: woensdag, 17 november 2021 08:58 Aan: ports@freebsd.org, Rene Ladan CC: portmgr@freebsd.org, python@freebsd.org Onderwerp: Bringing back lang/python27 with few modules? > > Hi, > > I am still a bit concerned with the total removal of python 2.7 year ago > and its support, I think this was a somewhat swift decision that may need > to be re-considered. I understand the urge for portmgr to move base over to > a supported version, but also that caused few important packages to be > dropped out of the FreeBSD without any fix in sight. I am specifically > talking about the PyPy package, which needs 2.7 to bootstrap itself even > when compiled as a "Python3" version. > > At the same time we still have a port of for example GCC 4.6, which is like > what, 15 years old? Also things in the tree like jython or micropython are > effectively python 2 implementations, so why are they allowed to be present > while not rock solid and field tried 2.7? In fact jython specifically > recommends using CPython2.7 to byte-compile some of the code that it cannot > chew by itself, so it's somewhat broken as well*. > > Is there any chance to bring CPython2.7 at the very least as a NO_PACKAGE > build tool that could be used for such cases now that we have moved most of > the supported packages to 3.x land? > > I had always considered FreeBSD to be about "tools not policy", but in this > particular case the policy seemingly took priority over tools and common > sense. > > Sorry if I am beating a dead horse here, just wanted to gauge the position > of the project before I go and open yet another bug report. > > Thanks! > > -Max > *) Like the following: > java.lang.RuntimeException: java.lang.RuntimeException: > Encountered too large method code in > /usr/ports/lang/pypy/work/pypy3.8-v7.3.7-src/rpython/rlib/unicodedata/unicodedb_6_0_0.py > > Please provide a CPython 2.7 bytecode file (.pyc) to proceed, e.g. run > python -m py_compile > /usr/ports/lang/pypy/work/pypy3.8-v7.3.7-src/rpython/rlib/unicodedata/unicodedb_6_0_0.py > and try again. > > Alternatively provide proper CPython 2.7 execute command via > cpython_cmd property, e.g. call > jython -J-Dcpython_cmd=python > or if running pip on Jython: > pip install --global-option="-J-Dcpython_cmd=python" > *** Error code 255 > > > ------=_Part_16_1176985807.1637153373960-- From nobody Wed Nov 17 14:52:27 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0E25188E490 for ; Wed, 17 Nov 2021 14:52:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mi+ports@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from symbion.zaytman.com (symbion.zaytman.com [64.112.176.10]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "symbion", Issuer "Narawntapu" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HvQrh3sMrz3C43; Wed, 17 Nov 2021 14:52:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mi+ports@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from narawntapu.narawntapu (pool-96-234-76-196.nwrknj.fios.verizon.net [96.234.76.196]) by symbion.zaytman.com (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPS id 1AHEqUNs079098 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 17 Nov 2021 09:52:30 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mi+ports@aldan.algebra.com) X-Authentication-Warning: symbion.zaytman.com: Host pool-96-234-76-196.nwrknj.fios.verizon.net [96.234.76.196] claimed to be narawntapu.narawntapu Received: from [192.168.3.13] (aldan [192.168.3.13]) by narawntapu.narawntapu (8.17.1/8.17.1) with ESMTP id 1AHEqR5O083011; Wed, 17 Nov 2021 09:52:27 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mi+ports@aldan.algebra.com) X-Authentication-Warning: narawntapu.narawntapu: Host aldan [192.168.3.13] claimed to be [192.168.3.13] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------cFdSXpVvNpxC7gMQAfQw5lll" Message-ID: <1b4981c5-4557-c667-11d9-936ee43be557@aldan.algebra.com> Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2021 09:52:27 -0500 List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Regarding port(s) you maintain in FreeBSD ports collection Content-Language: en-US To: Daniel Engberg Cc: "freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG" References: <9524a144672a383530187ed7369acea9@FreeBSD.org> From: "Mikhail T." In-Reply-To: <9524a144672a383530187ed7369acea9@FreeBSD.org> X-DCC-MGTINTERNET-Metrics: narawntapu 1170; bulk rep Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 rep=22% X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.8 required=23.7 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_50, HTML_MESSAGE,RATWR8_MESSID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.5 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.5 (2021-03-20) on narawntapu.narawntapu X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4HvQrh3sMrz3C43 X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[ports]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: Y This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------cFdSXpVvNpxC7gMQAfQw5lll Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 16.11.21 16:46, Daniel Engberg wrote: > There are numerous of reason why we need to remove ports, one major > reason is simply to have a sustainable repository. I don't know, what "sustainable repository" means in this context. It seems like another vague term, which can be interpreted in any way convenient. The rest of your reply does not address my arguments -- except to concede, that there are, indeed, no actual requirements, that the ports you seek to delete are violating. And yet, you want to delete them anyway... So, please, direct your considerable energies to maintenance of your own ports. If that's not challenging enough -- consider adopting some of the unmaintained ones. But don't delete other people's work -- and cease marking it "deprecated" on such iffy grounds as you've done before... Thank you, -mi --------------cFdSXpVvNpxC7gMQAfQw5lll-- From nobody Thu Nov 18 00:39:48 2021 X-Original-To: ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4697189C94A for ; Thu, 18 Nov 2021 00:40:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sobomax@sippysoft.com) Received: from mail-ed1-f53.google.com (mail-ed1-f53.google.com [209.85.208.53]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1D4" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HvgtZ1PXHz4Ygk for ; Thu, 18 Nov 2021 00:40:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sobomax@sippysoft.com) Received: by mail-ed1-f53.google.com with SMTP id g14so18935606edb.8 for ; Wed, 17 Nov 2021 16:40:06 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=HzyZZ3BGh07A8XlCBDP+1LwKm/hEYP9EJgixpzDQoQY=; b=CDioYltFsNtsohozggh4bnsHV3CJbG89CzYrTYDcOrhT3rw/gBxNz1LF5/oztD26eM FErhiL4wuycVCLKepGf7FjuPJEWZt1sZeMV1EAhqjPE3TKPzLjLv0tdpk9425NajVOVK k/w0pWnafx/QiFH8zbQ11ULlpE29uKKcbr/7wvzR1mXJ+r2oBIhUDImUol/p4hjcGqQY zsWTmC9YBUX5ZVZrZG0pz87Q8RJf/H4xmA+nI6WJYjI2HoTCNe4Kob1gHoG6XzkPWrDZ WXuLGDThyUtHdjT+to43URbvG04WQpMlypie3ULtQhvtowwTMwVSo34xRR7SFRLarFdH X33A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530p72IgcItl+Ae5zritaD0f3+kKsFtTq2aWpeMwEQ+ErP6Su2Sg zludjPAdD6RMLs0fcNEvjKJXQGDH04yqGJT9K1Nfq7MSKHBwQw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzUH6kUTzn0sgtj0mxIjEFaDdac95KdpuMYfuQVWMjFk62LsoxYbXTQ/N9V59KqfaUz0P6otSq1AkMvQZsdtM8= X-Received: by 2002:aa7:c390:: with SMTP id k16mr4685162edq.161.1637195998985; Wed, 17 Nov 2021 16:39:58 -0800 (PST) List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Maxim Sobolev Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2021 16:39:48 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Bringing back lang/python27 with few modules? To: Rene Ladan Cc: ports@freebsd.org, portmgr@freebsd.org, python@freebsd.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000f2977505d10565b6" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4HvgtZ1PXHz4Ygk X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: Y --000000000000f2977505d10565b6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Rene, GCC 4.6 is unmaintained for many years. It's open source after all. We have a mighty community who can patch and carry things once active maintenance is over. Sorry I stand corrected, lang/python27 is still there indeed. Then the removal of things like lang/pypy / lang/pypy3 is somewhat a mystery to me. My main frustration comes from the fact that `pkg install pypy3' no longer works in a freshly installed 12.x, yet it worked just fine two years ago and long before that as well. :( There is also this warning in Mk/Uses/python.mk, which is somewhat contrfactual now in November 2021: abd81a62faf64 (Antoine Brodin 2020-02-23 21:49:41 +0000 325) .if ${_PYTHON_ARGS} =3D=3D 2.7 abd81a62faf64 (Antoine Brodin 2020-02-23 21:49:41 +0000 326) DEV_WARNING+=3D "lang/python27 reached End of Life and will be removed on 2020-12-31, consider converting to a modern version of python" So I guess there is still a chance to get lang/pypy3 back? If and while lang/python27 is still there and is not going to be kicked out tomorrow. -Max On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 2:16 AM Rene Ladan wrote: > On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 12:37:07AM -0800, Maxim Sobolev wrote: > > P.S. AFAIK our documented criteria for removing a port is when one of t= he > > following is true: > > o Port lacks maintaintership; > > o Port has issues building on supported releases; > > o Port clearly has no users/use; > > o Port has some serious security issues. > > > > The lang/python27 did not belong to either of those bins, IMHO. > > "Unmaintained upstream" is also a criterion, and Python 2.7 fits there. > > Old GCC ports are slowly being phased out too ;) > > Regards, > Ren=C3=A9 > > --000000000000f2977505d10565b6-- From nobody Thu Nov 18 01:37:30 2021 X-Original-To: ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 864E6189A5C0; Thu, 18 Nov 2021 01:37:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from koobs.freebsd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pf1-x42d.google.com (mail-pf1-x42d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::42d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1D4" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Hvj8v31zbz4twZ; Thu, 18 Nov 2021 01:37:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from koobs.freebsd@gmail.com) Received: by mail-pf1-x42d.google.com with SMTP id o4so4314161pfp.13; Wed, 17 Nov 2021 17:37:35 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=sender:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:reply-to:subject :content-language:to:cc:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=IA1Ps6tuBnGcdyUaooP0qD4h1SivK2yPYP+wIzzNObE=; b=iwQzIAl8CA7bmiQSZrPN0Iv7EFRL1wvW++V/JY38CT9ELy++iglj18jUGUuOSsUnxy 03DpdJsGOJL13WWGoOpz97uGfMw2R/nDBQgPX6Yv1isuBHkN0NDlKhgQrOY3C0LD1SH/ hFC3PHMFtM6RUWQ9vdXdZ8JuzPiauIrjci8JGJ5hc1JhblZ4znzfaQI5b1Nmv5EtWj2m +kisCdMOjVeSTUBarBHRbIPfZursMNBidw3/DlVoTN61bkyjdqrXVZkQafzw/fLYIER2 amj/cZWeFo1bYtXHzU4K0Eds1ypTCq37cDfZD5cw2c1lh67jtdUJYelsqXedanynGEdD H6Zw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent :reply-to:subject:content-language:to:cc:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=IA1Ps6tuBnGcdyUaooP0qD4h1SivK2yPYP+wIzzNObE=; b=lsZK0gZyTTfmVQX1K2ovR1J4nc/c0uj2TTGZk7TsEhUtfXqLBrL9HEiBUKlYPH+YRh UPrNRd1i8DnchSWeKEFSHFHz3NO/xK1VarDQu+03VOmJN39HwFd99tvcAbzEvQbkPJ+d xgqD9aDyCvfjyugvvZ6gpOhYOZ6HRtwmXVU/c1uTirRuDXALmz/CjI/QBOlDi++GhGfO Shhae9yYg2K3PpFYeV5XHtHYtNg8ncvrswSbETvXPXb8wiZeYTg/HqxDYQIajW2hORk5 f6ffcULTkB43jDY+IRmKKVHeMdUm7a2pCcPCgAQngPCP5fXYfqZzc3HKJpvC/vrnFgUb Vrew== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5306E5xS1MJoyMWvy3pWE1J8jxMyjeG+L5v6VFUTpmlBujcFfMNj SjdQ67OEcJt2MkNOyd4He3nOPzMhNxE= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw8TccAhOCAgAOBBgKIhdTuSbuXCVRbaCTZO2qVb07LcT0spf5eaFH8lztU40ic/58o9zVrSA== X-Received: by 2002:a63:8943:: with SMTP id v64mr205612pgd.324.1637199454205; Wed, 17 Nov 2021 17:37:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPV6:2403:5807:1b:1:f018:fe2a:b66a:c857? (2403-5807-1b-1-f018-fe2a-b66a-c857.ip6.aussiebb.net. [2403:5807:1b:1:f018:fe2a:b66a:c857]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k1sm906868pfu.31.2021.11.17.17.37.32 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 17 Nov 2021 17:37:33 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <56cb1da0-311a-d498-f7a0-db2c0d11dca4@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2021 12:37:30 +1100 List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:96.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/96.0a1 Reply-To: koobs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Bringing back lang/python27 with few modules? Content-Language: en-US To: Maxim Sobolev Cc: portmgr@freebsd.org, python@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org References: From: Kubilay Kocak In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Hvj8v31zbz4twZ X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N On 17/11/2021 6:58 pm, Maxim Sobolev wrote: > Hi, > > I am still a bit concerned with the total removal of python 2.7 year ago > and its support, I think this was a somewhat swift decision that may need > to be re-considered. I understand the urge for portmgr to move base over to > a supported version, but also that caused few important packages to be > dropped out of the FreeBSD without any fix in sight. I am specifically > talking about the PyPy package, which needs 2.7 to bootstrap itself even > when compiled as a "Python3" version. > > At the same time we still have a port of for example GCC 4.6, which is like > what, 15 years old? Also things in the tree like jython or micropython are > effectively python 2 implementations, so why are they allowed to be present > while not rock solid and field tried 2.7? In fact jython specifically > recommends using CPython2.7 to byte-compile some of the code that it cannot > chew by itself, so it's somewhat broken as well*. > > Is there any chance to bring CPython2.7 at the very least as a NO_PACKAGE > build tool that could be used for such cases now that we have moved most of > the supported packages to 3.x land? > > I had always considered FreeBSD to be about "tools not policy", but in this > particular case the policy seemingly took priority over tools and common > sense. > > Sorry if I am beating a dead horse here, just wanted to gauge the position > of the project before I go and open yet another bug report. > > Thanks! > > -Max Hey Max, We've had many user reports over the last year re the entire situation, including a number recently about pypy in particular. Feel free to reach out to python@ and we'll sort something out together. We're on IRC (#freebsd-python @ libera) or you can email me off list and we can work out a good place. > *) Like the following: > java.lang.RuntimeException: java.lang.RuntimeException: > Encountered too large method code in > /usr/ports/lang/pypy/work/pypy3.8-v7.3.7-src/rpython/rlib/unicodedata/unicodedb_6_0_0.py > > Please provide a CPython 2.7 bytecode file (.pyc) to proceed, e.g. run > python -m py_compile > /usr/ports/lang/pypy/work/pypy3.8-v7.3.7-src/rpython/rlib/unicodedata/unicodedb_6_0_0.py > and try again. > > Alternatively provide proper CPython 2.7 execute command via > cpython_cmd property, e.g. call > jython -J-Dcpython_cmd=python > or if running pip on Jython: > pip install --global-option="-J-Dcpython_cmd=python" > *** Error code 255 > From nobody Thu Nov 18 06:43:26 2021 X-Original-To: ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBFD818338A2; Thu, 18 Nov 2021 06:43:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@freebsd.org) Received: from fc.opsec.eu (fc.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200:4::4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Hvqxz2DgSz3nSk; Thu, 18 Nov 2021 06:43:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@freebsd.org) Received: from pi by fc.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.95 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1mnb8o-000NW7-LT; Thu, 18 Nov 2021 07:43:26 +0100 Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2021 07:43:26 +0100 From: Kurt Jaeger To: portmgr@freebsd.org, python@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Bringing back lang/python27 with few modules? Message-ID: References: <56cb1da0-311a-d498-f7a0-db2c0d11dca4@FreeBSD.org> List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <56cb1da0-311a-d498-f7a0-db2c0d11dca4@FreeBSD.org> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Hvqxz2DgSz3nSk X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.00 / 15.00]; ASN(0.00)[asn:12502, ipnet:2001:14f8::/32, country:DE]; local_wl_from(0.00)[freebsd.org] X-Spam: Yes X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N Hi! > We've had many user reports over the last year re the entire situation, > including a number recently about pypy in particular. > > Feel free to reach out to python@ and we'll sort something out together. > > We're on IRC (#freebsd-python @ libera) or you can email me off list and > we can work out a good place. Then we can also revisit palemoon, see https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251117 -- pi@FreeBSD.org +49 171 3101372 Now what ? From eugen@grosbein.net Thu Nov 18 08:43:52 2021 X-Original-To: ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6E751890D84; Thu, 18 Nov 2021 08:44:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Received: from hz.grosbein.net (hz.grosbein.net [IPv6:2a01:4f8:c2c:26d8::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "hz.grosbein.net", Issuer "hz.grosbein.net" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Hvtd74NLYz4vH0; Thu, 18 Nov 2021 08:44:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Received: from eg.sd.rdtc.ru (root@eg.sd.rdtc.ru [62.231.161.221] (may be forged)) by hz.grosbein.net (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 1AI8i1xT095746 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 18 Nov 2021 08:44:02 GMT (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) X-Envelope-From: eugen@grosbein.net X-Envelope-To: rene@freebsd.org Received: from [10.58.0.10] (dadvw [10.58.0.10]) by eg.sd.rdtc.ru (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPS id 1AI8i1cZ074351 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT); Thu, 18 Nov 2021 15:44:01 +0700 (+07) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Subject: Re: Bringing back lang/python27 with few modules? To: Rene Ladan , Maxim Sobolev References: Cc: ports@freebsd.org, portmgr@freebsd.org, python@freebsd.org From: Eugene Grosbein Message-ID: Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2021 15:43:52 +0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,SHORTCIRCUIT autolearn=disabled version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Report: * -0.0 SHORTCIRCUIT No description available. * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on hz.grosbein.net X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Hvtd74NLYz4vH0 X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-Spam: Yes X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N 17.11.2021 17:16, Rene Ladan wrote: > On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 12:37:07AM -0800, Maxim Sobolev wrote: >> P.S. AFAIK our documented criteria for removing a port is when one of the >> following is true: >> o Port lacks maintaintership; >> o Port has issues building on supported releases; >> o Port clearly has no users/use; >> o Port has some serious security issues. >> >> The lang/python27 did not belong to either of those bins, IMHO. > > "Unmaintained upstream" is also a criterion, and Python 2.7 fits there. This is bad criterion for open source software and should not be considered without other reasons like "unfetchable" or "has known critical vulnerabilities". From nobody Fri Nov 19 08:31:37 2021 X-Original-To: ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B042D189C885 for ; Fri, 19 Nov 2021 08:31:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [96.47.72.83]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HwVJD4lF0z4rdk for ; Fri, 19 Nov 2021 08:31:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [192.168.0.88] (unknown [195.64.148.76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: avg/mail) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4B7CC1800 for ; Fri, 19 Nov 2021 08:31:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <34ea8551-b2a0-2b72-6217-56e6c0228ed4@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2021 10:31:37 +0200 List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/91.0 Thunderbird/91.3.0 Content-Language: en-US To: FreeBSD Ports From: Andriy Gapon Subject: pkg audit: security problems only Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N Is there an option to limit pkg audit to report security problems only? Right now the corresponding periodic script reports a lot of (what I consider to be) noise every night. It's about deprecated packages, mostly depending on python 2.7. And I consider those reports to be noise because 90% of reported packages are not actually going to be removed (e.g., kmail, korganizer, etc). So, I would like to be getting a security focused report useful for end users. Is that possible? Thank you! -- Andriy Gapon From nobody Fri Nov 19 08:47:44 2021 X-Original-To: ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C261182C52D for ; Fri, 19 Nov 2021 08:47:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [96.47.72.83]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HwVfq0vfGz3Cql; Fri, 19 Nov 2021 08:47:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: from aniel.nours.eu (nours.eu [IPv6:2001:41d0:8:3a4d::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: bapt) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DB84D181B; Fri, 19 Nov 2021 08:47:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: by aniel.nours.eu (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 388AC11539F; Fri, 19 Nov 2021 09:47:44 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2021 09:47:44 +0100 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: Andriy Gapon Cc: FreeBSD Ports Subject: Re: pkg audit: security problems only Message-ID: <20211119084744.irhskceo7c5p5iah@aniel.nours.eu> References: <34ea8551-b2a0-2b72-6217-56e6c0228ed4@FreeBSD.org> List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <34ea8551-b2a0-2b72-6217-56e6c0228ed4@FreeBSD.org> X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 10:31:37AM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote: > > Is there an option to limit pkg audit to report security problems only? > > Right now the corresponding periodic script reports a lot of (what I > consider to be) noise every night. It's about deprecated packages, mostly > depending on python 2.7. And I consider those reports to be noise because > 90% of reported packages are not actually going to be removed (e.g., kmail, > korganizer, etc). > > So, I would like to be getting a security focused report useful for end users. > Is that possible? > Thank you! > >From the periodic script here are all the parameters: : ${security_status_pkgaudit_enable:=YES} : ${security_status_pkgaudit_period:=daily} : ${security_status_pkgaudit_quiet:=YES} : ${security_status_pkgaudit_chroots=$pkg_chroots} : ${security_status_pkgaudit_jails=$pkg_jails} : ${security_status_pkgaudit_jails_ignore+=""} : ${security_status_pkgaudit_expiry:=2} : ${security_status_pkgaudit_expiration:=YES} : ${security_status_pkgaudit_deprecation:=YES} Best regards, Bapt From nobody Fri Nov 19 09:17:43 2021 X-Original-To: ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7A76188EBD1 for ; Fri, 19 Nov 2021 09:17:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [96.47.72.83]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HwWKQ6Hp8z3Pnn; Fri, 19 Nov 2021 09:17:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [192.168.0.88] (unknown [195.64.148.76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: avg/mail) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5ECD9182D; Fri, 19 Nov 2021 09:17:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <71d44469-bc53-fa50-8513-89a3f52d5497@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2021 11:17:43 +0200 List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/91.0 Thunderbird/91.3.0 From: Andriy Gapon Subject: Re: pkg audit: security problems only Content-Language: en-US To: Baptiste Daroussin Cc: FreeBSD Ports References: <34ea8551-b2a0-2b72-6217-56e6c0228ed4@FreeBSD.org> <20211119084744.irhskceo7c5p5iah@aniel.nours.eu> In-Reply-To: <20211119084744.irhskceo7c5p5iah@aniel.nours.eu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N On 19/11/2021 10:47, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 10:31:37AM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote: >> >> Is there an option to limit pkg audit to report security problems only? >> >> Right now the corresponding periodic script reports a lot of (what I >> consider to be) noise every night. It's about deprecated packages, mostly >> depending on python 2.7. And I consider those reports to be noise because >> 90% of reported packages are not actually going to be removed (e.g., kmail, >> korganizer, etc). >> >> So, I would like to be getting a security focused report useful for end users. >> Is that possible? >> Thank you! >> > > From the periodic script here are all the parameters: > > : ${security_status_pkgaudit_enable:=YES} > : ${security_status_pkgaudit_period:=daily} > : ${security_status_pkgaudit_quiet:=YES} > : ${security_status_pkgaudit_chroots=$pkg_chroots} > : ${security_status_pkgaudit_jails=$pkg_jails} > : ${security_status_pkgaudit_jails_ignore+=""} > : ${security_status_pkgaudit_expiry:=2} > : ${security_status_pkgaudit_expiration:=YES} > : ${security_status_pkgaudit_deprecation:=YES} Thank you! Before asking I checked two places, pkg help audit and /etc/periodic, and I came up empty. I didn't think of checking /usr/local/etc/periodic/ or pkg annotate. -- Andriy Gapon From nobody Fri Nov 19 14:54:23 2021 X-Original-To: ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDDA31889AB3 for ; Fri, 19 Nov 2021 14:54:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Hwfnq4p2tz3GFB for ; Fri, 19 Nov 2021 14:54:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (portscout.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 83CB124A6 for ; Fri, 19 Nov 2021 14:54:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.nyi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.10]) by portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 1AJEsNX2091496 for ; Fri, 19 Nov 2021 14:54:23 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 1AJEsNHG091495; Fri, 19 Nov 2021 14:54:23 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <202111191454.1AJEsNHG091495@portscout.nyi.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.nyi.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2021 14:54:23 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ lang/csharp-mode.el | 0.9.2 | 1.1.0 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Reported by: portscout! From nobody Fri Nov 19 15:34:03 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66B2B189F1BD for ; Fri, 19 Nov 2021 15:34:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk) Received: from cp160176.hpdns.net (cp160176.hpdns.net [91.238.160.176]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Hwggt00ktz3ntC for ; Fri, 19 Nov 2021 15:34:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=milibyte.co.uk; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type: MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:Subject:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=+EB72wmUJg1S6VmcPOEzkgN33TPvpew7UuTlmsyYfgI=; b=EHHBTXpRJTvBiIPRM3/QqS9njI g1tQRC6f53BeTq40MiQFGyspiR7Zs5j5E8fzJZD/etbF5RZy5NKu1o7JR06bjourOA8A2wPPnCEjC vCNtSTHpxtqgX/FJ9ahFXgRe48wOoVyY7I0txvISLPBiWJHwAKuE95T4gMiHLXpJTkhzQSA2oGGUB I+FMr65QmXi5cTwwsBtvdStfrHU2GDkUDlyR71wdFtUDJUVCOojgLqx/blput5I0DzSx/AbveRJtx 3hzxEoqBCxoUStkQwSYi2xyRbPHvP7GNAb8LSocokYtmQz9P6ESnPmqxnxTf9p+Ujxt39uCzhA50G gZNjHl9w==; Received: from 82-71-56-121.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk ([82.71.56.121]:50268 helo=curlew.milibyte.co.uk) by cp160176.hpdns.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1mo5tt-001GZ2-Gd for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Fri, 19 Nov 2021 15:34:04 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=curlew.localnet) by curlew.milibyte.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1mo5ts-000Km8-ET for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Fri, 19 Nov 2021 15:34:04 +0000 From: Mike Clarke To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: qt5-webengine and py27 ? Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2021 15:34:03 +0000 Message-ID: <2830556.fspEBoepoX@curlew> List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="nextPart2242545.gG0HsuGxDd" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on curlew.milibyte.co.uk); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-YourOrg-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-YourOrg-MailScanner-ID: 1mo5tt-001GZ2-Gd X-YourOrg-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-YourOrg-MailScanner-SpamCheck: X-YourOrg-MailScanner-From: jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk X-Spam-Status: No X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - cp160176.hpdns.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - milibyte.co.uk X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: cp160176.hpdns.net: authenticated_id: mailpool@milibyte.co.uk X-Authenticated-Sender: cp160176.hpdns.net: mailpool@milibyte.co.uk X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Hwggt00ktz3ntC X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=milibyte.co.uk header.s=default header.b=EHHBTXpR; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk designates 91.238.160.176 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.32 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+a]; HAS_X_SOURCE(0.00)[]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[milibyte.co.uk:+]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.96)[-0.960]; HAS_X_ANTIABUSE(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; CTE_CASE(0.50)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:12703, ipnet:91.238.160.0/22, country:GB]; HAS_X_AS(0.00)[mailpool@milibyte.co.uk]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[milibyte.co.uk:s=default]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.86)[-0.859]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[milibyte.co.uk]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; HAS_X_GMSV(0.00)[mailpool@milibyte.co.uk]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[91.238.160.176:from]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: Y This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --nextPart2242545.gG0HsuGxDd Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" I'm getting seriously confused about packages with dependency on py27. Daily periodic reports from pkg-audit report 39 deprecated packages which use EOL Python 2.7, most of them via www/qt5-webengine. For example: "kmail-21.08.3: Tag: deprecated Value: Uses EOL Python 2.7 via www/qt5-webengine" ...and "qt5-webengine-5.15.2_5: Tag: deprecated Value: Uses Python 2.7 which is EOLed upstream" But qt5-webengine does not appear to depend on py27 curlew:/home/mike% pkg info -d qt5-webengine-5.15.2_5 | grep -c py27 0 Furthermore I don't appear to have any py27 packages in my system curlew:/home/mike% pkg info -x py27 pkg: No package(s) matching py27 Most of the deprecated packages are KDE related so if they had a dependency on py27 I would expect lots of problems with KDE and that's not happening. So what am I missing? -- Mike Clarke --nextPart2242545.gG0HsuGxDd-- From nobody Fri Nov 19 15:41:11 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAFA718A277C for ; Fri, 19 Nov 2021 15:41:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fuz@fuz.su) Received: from fuz.su (fuz.su [IPv6:2001:41d0:8:e508::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "amnesiac", Issuer "amnesiac" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Hwgqs3XPVz3qlv for ; Fri, 19 Nov 2021 15:41:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fuz@fuz.su) Received: from fuz.su (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fuz.su (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPS id 1AJFfBjT042254 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 19 Nov 2021 16:41:11 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from fuz@fuz.su) Received: (from fuz@localhost) by fuz.su (8.16.1/8.16.1/Submit) id 1AJFfB90042253; Fri, 19 Nov 2021 16:41:11 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from fuz) Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2021 16:41:11 +0100 From: Robert Clausecker To: Mike Clarke Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: qt5-webengine and py27 ? Message-ID: References: <2830556.fspEBoepoX@curlew> List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2830556.fspEBoepoX@curlew> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Hwgqs3XPVz3qlv X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N Hi Mike, Python 2.7 is a build dependency of this port. It is needed AFAIK as a part of the webkit build system. Yours, Robert Clausecker Am Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 03:34:03PM +0000 schrieb Mike Clarke: > I'm getting seriously confused about packages with dependency on py27. > > Daily periodic reports from pkg-audit report 39 deprecated packages which use EOL Python > 2.7, most of them via www/qt5-webengine. For example: > > "kmail-21.08.3: Tag: deprecated Value: Uses EOL Python 2.7 via www/qt5-webengine" > > ...and > > "qt5-webengine-5.15.2_5: Tag: deprecated Value: Uses Python 2.7 which is EOLed > upstream" > > But qt5-webengine does not appear to depend on py27 > > curlew:/home/mike% pkg info -d qt5-webengine-5.15.2_5 | grep -c py27 > 0 > Furthermore I don't appear to have any py27 packages in my system > > curlew:/home/mike% pkg info -x py27 > pkg: No package(s) matching py27 > > Most of the deprecated packages are KDE related so if they had a dependency on py27 I > would expect lots of problems with KDE and that's not happening. > > So what am I missing? > > -- > Mike Clarke -- () ascii ribbon campaign - for an 8-bit clean world /\ - against html email - against proprietary attachments From nobody Fri Nov 19 20:38:37 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 592321850393 for ; Fri, 19 Nov 2021 20:38:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jkeenan@pobox.com) Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com (pb-smtp21.pobox.com [173.228.157.53]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HwpRF02lsz3Ffk for ; Fri, 19 Nov 2021 20:38:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jkeenan@pobox.com) Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63342159E21 for ; Fri, 19 Nov 2021 15:38:42 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jkeenan@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=to:from :subject:message-id:date:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=wqMoHeBeHHy9U+8t27/1AaHAK lo9lgzj4pH0lPjUj8s=; b=TPk4CYtqzud+fyKKwp8pjEjoF+X23mUcvy/Op5jYh VHz0uU36jcMZ52dtyTHtyW0jwHVl03cww6+KUTlzzBfi+RDtfOdrOu/3OF2EDoJ/ JXO59fDRcFpOIGe/LFl1HHsoSbFOnZLeix5wDf0wX8mrEhl3RGgV3t9ayAZ1yXn9 oY= Received: from pb-smtp21.sea.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CA81159E20 for ; Fri, 19 Nov 2021 15:38:42 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jkeenan@pobox.com) Received: from [192.168.1.4] (unknown [24.185.115.142]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DE443159E1F for ; Fri, 19 Nov 2021 15:38:39 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jkeenan@pobox.com) To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: James E Keenan Subject: Request review on new port submission: p5-B-Debug Message-ID: <58f7ef20-99fd-df25-b88f-e87d6fa8dac6@pobox.com> Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2021 15:38:37 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.14.0 List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Pobox-Relay-ID: ADA7ED9E-4978-11EC-8150-98D80D944F46-57062903!pb-smtp21.pobox.com X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4HwpRF02lsz3Ffk X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=pobox.com header.s=sasl header.b=TPk4CYtq; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=pobox.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of jkeenan@pobox.com designates 173.228.157.53 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=jkeenan@pobox.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.10 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[pobox.com:s=sasl]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[173.228.157.53:from]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[pobox.com:dkim]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:173.228.157.0/24]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[pobox.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[pobox.com,none]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[24.185.115.142:received]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:11403, ipnet:173.228.157.0/24, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[173.228.157.53:from] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N Would it be possible to review the following port submission (originally submitted in September)? https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=258350 This ports Perl CPAN distribution B-Debug, which is now needed as a prerequisite to a more important port, p5-Devel-Cover. Thank you very much. Jim Keenan From nobody Fri Nov 19 22:04:16 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD94F188A96A for ; Fri, 19 Nov 2021 22:04:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tatsuki_makino@hotmail.com) Received: from APC01-SG2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-sgaapc01olkn2071.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.92.53.71]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.protection.outlook.com", Issuer "DigiCert Cloud Services CA-1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HwrL53C7Sz3wKh for ; Fri, 19 Nov 2021 22:04:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tatsuki_makino@hotmail.com) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=hVfS3/xqsMZbxoMO3Y+67NQ6KA8OTgkyTm7ZyyBMMrJofipKw8spR2oEgy+mFpH3K8WXOpop+sRzPD4Mj/OJRC3tHiM9z6v4E1Rck/9FuVRmBG4IsAVbm/fQ5uREyTCyjjkOBdOfL1ECSAgAAxU30Gw2zM1rf4eqvYjGXZV9zSXqE+TPy+ZsFWKtxbvi7FYJ1CpYsEh5fGKznXCEyR7Oc3lKoYtwLrftvkT2tKRAnlWcI+mvGlXpOPQbKyWyNoPv1YZRFQOkdZM+B8L/VB0gzPNJcaMlfZlFj72wYuJukTwjbDYkTE2DhfqjlOLlpoe/cu3klZdokSfRgtVHZovg1A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=vUkJ3wt5neE8BsN9ZJWINOM+VISL3Stu7CVel7XYc4g=; b=cKoioVthkVY6sVyVAnG9JiHsOreYRsSrVpafdoGVzyqCUEMLv3wSv4tWQ+7Tx4i+Frt/Dsd1z47UOyjFsrso1M5j/i+I8/DGK9YOsnPPHC+JSALpJngF8q8dMh6r3at4Tolu3DoWh4xxmQK4HZM5LOMGdMzGcvcc+IkMjJQgOuSN1MN6GlMnSofavu/jNdTmSVQEhHgxwiINhamiQwqAenxY1R6l7iQlkhTM5UHg8+7oXfOF5oQkYqPxQj+XFg8R+iCvdpwN2kcSNEvjejQEiyMzD8kqJT8+2WDHSYnvPXqIJHb2iUt+ejkyK5EZKDTSFQIWx8wvFIHaQmFIPlLOSQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=none; dmarc=none; dkim=none; arc=none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hotmail.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=vUkJ3wt5neE8BsN9ZJWINOM+VISL3Stu7CVel7XYc4g=; b=qkrzkJWfM7k8N5CYa565P72MeaOGpoLZ5JlBdyNXmUAURw8pJwBDKPJG2DbC8FOCNByiZXEDTCLZDdZSlcsSXRlllD9443EAl7UkE9BqUQ2zXXtDhnAZK4PBToltnyvuWOsHQHuQ4+gyC7A4Nz8qyQNqnSyJ7qsyrQI+yZGfy2PNUKPS4Ud5nJvZP5go08NuGXbFQf7z6XXIDI1RcH69Pz2ytBw+umf7kvn8Yh1Li9Eass5iCAswJWEHppPHMKKR3tzozjBgtLJ+YJ5pEgWcHA0b23P4mZWthJlWimn6oJsk02Bz7mjcezJx7+IeRaIszycwZaam0rO62F30wg/roQ== Received: from PSAPR03MB5639.apcprd03.prod.outlook.com (2603:1096:301:66::13) by PS1PR03MB5097.apcprd03.prod.outlook.com (2603:1096:300:79::16) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.4734.11; Fri, 19 Nov 2021 22:04:20 +0000 Received: from PSAPR03MB5639.apcprd03.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::35ac:1575:caf8:7b91]) by PSAPR03MB5639.apcprd03.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::35ac:1575:caf8:7b91%6]) with mapi id 15.20.4713.022; Fri, 19 Nov 2021 22:04:20 +0000 Subject: Re: qt5-webengine and py27 ? To: Robert Clausecker , Mike Clarke Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <2830556.fspEBoepoX@curlew> From: Tatsuki Makino Message-ID: Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2021 07:04:16 +0900 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/52.0 SeaMonkey/2.49.4 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TMN: [R5WAxN2k5pjUucnE40C13/FBux+NUuTo] X-ClientProxiedBy: TY2PR06CA0027.apcprd06.prod.outlook.com (2603:1096:404:2e::15) To PSAPR03MB5639.apcprd03.prod.outlook.com (2603:1096:301:66::13) X-Microsoft-Original-Message-ID: List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MS-Exchange-MessageSentRepresentingType: 1 Received: from T4.test (121.93.136.140) by TY2PR06CA0027.apcprd06.prod.outlook.com (2603:1096:404:2e::15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.4713.19 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 19 Nov 2021 22:04:19 +0000 X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: 9206be0e-beb8-43f7-ada0-08d9aba88940 X-MS-Exchange-SLBlob-MailProps: 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 X-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: PS1PR03MB5097: X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0; X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info: 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 X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount: 1 X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0: 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 X-OriginatorOrg: sct-15-20-3174-8-msonline-outlook-792b7.templateTenant X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 9206be0e-beb8-43f7-ada0-08d9aba88940 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: PSAPR03MB5639.apcprd03.prod.outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 19 Nov 2021 22:04:19.9659 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-RMS-PersistedConsumerOrg: 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000 X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: PS1PR03MB5097 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4HwrL53C7Sz3wKh X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N I think it shows up because it is written directly in /usr/ports/deskutils/kmail/Makefile. I think it's a warning that when Python 2.7 is completely removed, qt5-webengine cannot be built, and therefore kmail using qt5-webengine cannot be used either. From nobody Fri Nov 19 22:41:10 2021 X-Original-To: ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47461189DD5A; Fri, 19 Nov 2021 22:41:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list_freebsd@bluerosetech.com) Received: from echo.brtsvcs.net (echo.brtsvcs.net [IPv6:2607:f740:c::4ae]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Hws8d1Bmmz4dJV; Fri, 19 Nov 2021 22:41:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list_freebsd@bluerosetech.com) Received: from chombo.houseloki.net (65-100-43-2.dia.static.qwest.net [65.100.43.2]) by echo.brtsvcs.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AFB7538D0D; Fri, 19 Nov 2021 22:41:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.26.25.100] (ivy.pas.ds.pilgrimaccounting.com [10.26.25.100]) by chombo.houseloki.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 63E8912280; Fri, 19 Nov 2021 14:41:12 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: Bringing back lang/python27 with few modules? To: Eugene Grosbein , Rene Ladan , Maxim Sobolev Cc: ports@freebsd.org, portmgr@freebsd.org, python@freebsd.org References: From: Mel Pilgrim Message-ID: <09b3a479-5aca-7524-bcee-f03754fefd7c@bluerosetech.com> Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2021 14:41:10 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.12.0 List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Hws8d1Bmmz4dJV X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of list_freebsd@bluerosetech.com designates 2607:f740:c::4ae as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=list_freebsd@bluerosetech.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.97 / 15.00]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.27)[0.273]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[bluerosetech.com]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; RCPT_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[6]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(1.00)[1.000]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:36236, ipnet:2607:f740:c::/48, country:US]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[] X-Spam: Yes X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N On 2021-11-18 0:43, Eugene Grosbein wrote: > 17.11.2021 17:16, Rene Ladan wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 12:37:07AM -0800, Maxim Sobolev wrote: >>> P.S. AFAIK our documented criteria for removing a port is when one of the >>> following is true: >>> o Port lacks maintaintership; >>> o Port has issues building on supported releases; >>> o Port clearly has no users/use; >>> o Port has some serious security issues. >>> >>> The lang/python27 did not belong to either of those bins, IMHO. >> >> "Unmaintained upstream" is also a criterion, and Python 2.7 fits there. > > This is bad criterion for open source software and should not be considered without other reasons > like "unfetchable" or "has known critical vulnerabilities". It very likely has known critical vulnerabilities. For example, CVE-2021-3177 is a potential RCE bug in Python 3.x. It was officially fixed upstream, and the backported fix is found in Python 2.7 LTS contracts. From nobody Fri Nov 19 22:44:57 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1814189FA36 for ; Fri, 19 Nov 2021 22:45:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from SRS0=DF6y=QG=quip.cz=000.fbsd@elsa.codelab.cz) Received: from elsa.codelab.cz (elsa.codelab.cz [94.124.105.4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HwsF02MP6z4fmh; Fri, 19 Nov 2021 22:45:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from SRS0=DF6y=QG=quip.cz=000.fbsd@elsa.codelab.cz) Received: from elsa.codelab.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by elsa.codelab.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE9682842B; Fri, 19 Nov 2021 23:44:59 +0100 (CET) Received: from illbsd.quip.test (ip-78-45-215-131.net.upcbroadband.cz [78.45.215.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by elsa.codelab.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9075828411; Fri, 19 Nov 2021 23:44:58 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: Regarding port(s) you maintain in FreeBSD ports collection To: Daniel Engberg , "Mikhail T." Cc: "freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG" References: <9524a144672a383530187ed7369acea9@FreeBSD.org> From: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> Message-ID: <6f098ce8-0361-543a-b480-83a147fa98a1@quip.cz> Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2021 23:44:57 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <9524a144672a383530187ed7369acea9@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4HwsF02MP6z4fmh X-Spamd-Bar: + Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of "SRS0=DF6y=QG=quip.cz=000.fbsd@elsa.codelab.cz" has no SPF policy when checking 94.124.105.4) smtp.mailfrom="SRS0=DF6y=QG=quip.cz=000.fbsd@elsa.codelab.cz" X-Spamd-Result: default: False [1.79 / 15.00]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.41)[0.413]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[ports]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[quip.cz]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(1.00)[1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.82)[-0.819]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[000.fbsd@quip.cz,SRS0=DF6y=QG=quip.cz=000.fbsd@elsa.codelab.cz]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:42000, ipnet:94.124.104.0/21, country:CZ]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[000.fbsd@quip.cz,SRS0=DF6y=QG=quip.cz=000.fbsd@elsa.codelab.cz]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[78.45.215.131:received] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N On 16/11/2021 22:46, Daniel Engberg wrote: > Hi Mikhail, > > There are numerous of reason why we need to remove ports, one major > reason is simply to have a sustainable repository. One example is the > deprecation of Python 2.x which is long overdue but we're slowly getting > there because there still are a few crucial pieces of software that > depends on it such as Chromium. What is sustainable repository? And why having "old" software in the ports tree makes it unsustainable? I am personally using software with latest release from 2009 and it still works, still is buildable on today's FreeBSD and is still useful. Why remove it? And with Python 2.7, Chromium and other ports, it is one of a few points where I really hate decision of portmgr team because some ports where immediately marked and expired and removed a year ago because of dependency on Python 2.7 but some (Chromium) are still there even if all of them use Python 2.7 for build. For example Iridium expired 2020-12-31, Falkon is marked expired 2021-06-23 but Chromium? Nothing, like it is not depending on the same Python 2.7. This disparity ****** me off. regards Miroslav Lachman From nobody Sat Nov 20 01:07:28 2021 X-Original-To: ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1633189DD51 for ; Sat, 20 Nov 2021 01:07:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sobomax@sippysoft.com) Received: from mail-ed1-f51.google.com (mail-ed1-f51.google.com [209.85.208.51]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1D4" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HwwPR3qr5z3vM1 for ; Sat, 20 Nov 2021 01:07:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sobomax@sippysoft.com) Received: by mail-ed1-f51.google.com with SMTP id w1so49646673edc.6 for ; Fri, 19 Nov 2021 17:07:39 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=/ueZnDQRluvRLGRZHNsPHdMlS6f7QdHW1F1VMeLjWtQ=; b=eay6QOnTCopn3e/ZmcpZu+JpsphRp48KAXzYkWxe2mLTdcPZr/3q+ekImZCE2bZNYq irC40sCXTKKaOk6kbSKCaQdIICmg/XjJeZwNbadVHHiG5zqtS73gjnHVoQ9SdjLlfyhT zDRbg+G1ZCmftjiv5f4+d0Es+cJ/mcoUR3p1Zb1I4prbg0gY54oRBwSd97sI6dOu0EDP hdAlPl5E/hAHsxZwWzDKzzOfwyN67eBTQnpwBHUQGXxpYrgX0W0/04//YfYgE7HEF+Bm sAfx9atItKNG7ZPzp26kh+cFEHliyqnPss/ZNGlevuXAcNyR5XAxFUouwOBFWKj2f28L N0VQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533/RcRBE/PXjVYz998FUxIMn4Df5+A+VTIf29/WT23UNrVLClS6 vkdmM5jqGUitJW7KCcjslT5qd/cNKhKlnx0OSYEVcnRdD3U= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJySsO69gju2SbyLMoJwKTRng9WmVxTHxRBRXR7S2WabpYVKuJmRmfeUdZ2UZQLZgLwtzs8nDas5Garvsu/tuMo= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:455:: with SMTP id p21mr31709685edw.384.1637370458419; Fri, 19 Nov 2021 17:07:38 -0800 (PST) List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <09b3a479-5aca-7524-bcee-f03754fefd7c@bluerosetech.com> In-Reply-To: <09b3a479-5aca-7524-bcee-f03754fefd7c@bluerosetech.com> From: Maxim Sobolev Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2021 17:07:28 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Bringing back lang/python27 with few modules? To: Mel Pilgrim Cc: Eugene Grosbein , Rene Ladan , ports@freebsd.org, portmgr@freebsd.org, python@freebsd.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000008a4a5805d12e04da" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4HwwPR3qr5z3vM1 X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: Y --0000000000008a4a5805d12e04da Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Well with regards to a language port, "vulnerability" has somewhat dubious applicability. For sure there are many ways to write an insecure C program allowed by the language itself. Shall we consider all C compilers inheretedly bad based on just that? Bottom line is that having well supported python 2 tools and environment remains quite useful thing to have for a lot of FreeBSD users out there. And this need is unlikely to go away in the next 2-3 years to come. -Max On Fri., Nov. 19, 2021, 2:41 p.m. Mel Pilgrim, < list_freebsd@bluerosetech.com> wrote: > On 2021-11-18 0:43, Eugene Grosbein wrote: > > 17.11.2021 17:16, Rene Ladan wrote: > >> On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 12:37:07AM -0800, Maxim Sobolev wrote: > >>> P.S. AFAIK our documented criteria for removing a port is when one of > the > >>> following is true: > >>> o Port lacks maintaintership; > >>> o Port has issues building on supported releases; > >>> o Port clearly has no users/use; > >>> o Port has some serious security issues. > >>> > >>> The lang/python27 did not belong to either of those bins, IMHO. > >> > >> "Unmaintained upstream" is also a criterion, and Python 2.7 fits there. > > > > This is bad criterion for open source software and should not be > considered without other reasons > > like "unfetchable" or "has known critical vulnerabilities". > > It very likely has known critical vulnerabilities. For example, > CVE-2021-3177 is a potential RCE bug in Python 3.x. It was officially > fixed upstream, and the backported fix is found in Python 2.7 LTS > contracts. > > --0000000000008a4a5805d12e04da-- From nobody Sat Nov 20 02:52:40 2021 X-Original-To: ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36068188A5C5 for ; Sat, 20 Nov 2021 02:52:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jbeich@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [96.47.72.132]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Hwykl12HQz51BQ; Sat, 20 Nov 2021 02:52:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jbeich@freebsd.org) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1637376767; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=HEXcMMY3zqG9je3xjP9NaZqiw8BwTytgJNe1veBZBEE=; b=LmLomnhUev66qDgXkTMv30dXOYi1DS0FH1tnssF5hyohZN/Gk7HV6O/3gTkS/8C4FubNYr OSGACfh7e5lvmDVao5XOoa9AxGQoTCUGI1NvkkRzFsjwUZRJpb2dwRHoUNsWUXIdwtvIx+ gokvhnmX7+Trr3veqROvO7uXlqkgG6F+IUcXjD92MHyW0KaNO1y40OMbQJZDP8upVCqSfe BT9H4DvDVzeCNnQFy9uLPjuOi1ti8aH8IGVOgS2pP6ETuoZ2PeOy/wrYUiXZlUJnp5XTWU OAzvlotQILgLefj6BXTezEiaxjF78gRwuGcXeVNfOTqyHRN5t/f0l+GrdplHnw== Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1354) id 145F5122A2; Sat, 20 Nov 2021 02:52:47 +0000 (UTC) From: Jan Beich To: Maxim Sobolev Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Bringing back lang/python27 with few modules? References: <09b3a479-5aca-7524-bcee-f03754fefd7c@bluerosetech.com> Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2021 03:52:40 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Maxim Sobolev's message of "Fri, 19 Nov 2021 17:07:28 -0800") Message-ID: List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1637376767; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=HEXcMMY3zqG9je3xjP9NaZqiw8BwTytgJNe1veBZBEE=; b=aNCcXpNCP93aqC3HY1KX1pub8jj2VzgWCJDfXCbFzOuYlNVsX35F6CqkvcjLFoh67gMYfD ZFSSw3SPTxc//WLE497jMaOOHc+eTe3gWrrsH/U1dsc0Vo6qP9viZPI2cANVfzJChFiaia yFXFDI/KKRzAn8CSdkAmocfMvMKrZ90y4/HmC4ASVJF0fXzElCPpyKsXBzZKxBSLN92WTm KAnH2KaBPaLCDCTSrlBPMWJuXSkGKX1sL4yswIOdiNXxVkigQVMu4h7AvngwryqOYS+Bqy EYYc3M8nx6rviK38ePtFtFd9V99YjhSuDA8hGrxmbZWswPZwn1F8Q4sHf4uxLA== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1637376767; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=KDR4kPq/ZuRwk/xMTziUhBka5n4v4u8wkS6Yr8jduWO1SuxN3hvBfzWRG/bLgKNkZzELoz uYj6uqh1FsgyLuC8fNGAX31utzBsTloZjrjMgqiCqKhxwtYwWECOFW9jYMlFjJFF03t6Ay JbZFTHftdG0I4wYx/Rp+KGHtNNBiOyk3PGyYhS3hGiLNlTgxQ0EIZnO3qwYK7D1xTauwYd wzgHXCQ31kFStbeItnfDM4rcuCvhoTuiA3/+Py1YweLwEL35xz/zzvi3H3HHoR9lbnSKb3 WjWcp6UvWjMQjzGikH5bdDqeuVatcwxeR+PDUxTHXKysyhuPrirUnWbc5USOng== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N Maxim Sobolev writes: > Well with regards to a language port, "vulnerability" has somewhat dubious > applicability. For sure there are many ways to write an insecure C program > allowed by the language itself. Shall we consider all C compilers > inheretedly bad based on just that? CPython provides not just the compiler but also runtime. As C originally came from Unix all compatible (via POSIX) systems have something like libc shipped by OS vendor instead of language implementation. FreeBSD Project doesn't support EOL versions of FreeBSD, so in ports/ the support for vulnerable libc versions evaporates very quickly. Vulnerabilities in language runtimes are far more common than in codegen e.g., https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/search/results?query=cpe:2.3:a:golang:go:1.15.0 https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/search/results?query=cpe:2.3:a:rust-lang:rust:1.48.0 https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/search/results?query=cpe:2.3:a:python:python:2.7.0 lang/pypy can probably be resurrected by using prebuilt binary for bootstrap instead of lang/python27. Kinda similar to lang/rust, lang/ghc, lang/sbcl. However, I'm *not* interested myself, USES=python doesn't support lang/pypy, blindly replacing CPython with PyPy rarely works and modules still supporting Python 2.* maybe unmaintained upstream thus potentially vulnerable. From nobody Sat Nov 20 17:11:08 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3661C189F513 for ; Sat, 20 Nov 2021 17:11:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from soth.netfence.it (mailserver.netfence.it [78.134.96.152]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mailserver.netfence.it", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HxKnK103Fz3k2B for ; Sat, 20 Nov 2021 17:11:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from [10.1.2.18] (alamar.local.netfence.it [10.1.2.18]) (authenticated bits=0) by soth.netfence.it (8.17.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPSA id 1AKHB8rC097529 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 20 Nov 2021 18:11:09 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) X-Authentication-Warning: soth.netfence.it: Host alamar.local.netfence.it [10.1.2.18] claimed to be [10.1.2.18] Message-ID: Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2021 18:11:08 +0100 List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.3.0 Content-Language: en-US To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: Andrea Venturoli Subject: ThunderBird and DAV calendars Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4HxKnK103Fz3k2B X-Spamd-Bar: ++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=netfence.it; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of ml@netfence.it designates 78.134.96.152 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=ml@netfence.it X-Spamd-Result: default: False [2.20 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:78.134.96.152]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; HAS_XAW(0.00)[]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(1.00)[0.997]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(1.00)[1.000]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[netfence.it,none]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(1.00)[1.000]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:35612, ipnet:78.134.0.0/17, country:IT]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N Hello. Is anyone here using ThunderBird and DAV calendars? After the upgrade to 91 I'm still able to use the calendars I had configured before, but I cannot add any new one, since the password prompt never appears. I asked on Mozilla's ml, but they say it works (and in fact does, on Windows). So I'm trying, first of all, to find out whether this is: _ a problem of mine; _ a problem on FreeBSD; _ a problem on X (I have no Linux to test). TIA to anyone who is willing to try. bye av,. From nobody Sat Nov 20 17:42:44 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C107D1888CC1 for ; Sat, 20 Nov 2021 17:42:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from madpilot@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::24b:4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HxLTf57Xhz3vZn; Sat, 20 Nov 2021 17:42:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from madpilot@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [172.24.42.21] (host-79-51-17-182.retail.telecomitalia.it [79.51.17.182]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: madpilot/mail) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 467F021C6E; Sat, 20 Nov 2021 17:42:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from madpilot@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <900125bd-fa5d-bf3b-b809-d683196b3ad4@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2021 18:42:44 +0100 List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.3.2 Subject: Re: ThunderBird and DAV calendars Content-Language: en-US To: Andrea Venturoli , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: From: Guido Falsi In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N On 20/11/21 18:11, Andrea Venturoli wrote: > > Hello. > > Is anyone here using ThunderBird and DAV calendars? > > After the upgrade to 91 I'm still able to use the calendars I had > configured before, but I cannot add any new one, since the password > prompt never appears. > I asked on Mozilla's ml, but they say it works (and in fact does, on > Windows). > > So I'm trying, first of all, to find out whether this is: > _ a problem of mine; > _ a problem on FreeBSD; > _ a problem on X (I have no Linux to test). > > TIA to anyone who is willing to try. > I'm observing the same issue, did not have time to try to diagnose it though. Did you file a bug report in bugzilla so this can be tracked? -- Guido Falsi From eugen@grosbein.net Sat Nov 20 18:07:21 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE01C1895026 for ; Sat, 20 Nov 2021 18:07:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Received: from hz.grosbein.net (hz.grosbein.net [IPv6:2a01:4f8:c2c:26d8::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "hz.grosbein.net", Issuer "hz.grosbein.net" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HxM2P5yh9z4XJP for ; Sat, 20 Nov 2021 18:07:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Received: from eg.sd.rdtc.ru (root@eg.sd.rdtc.ru [62.231.161.221] (may be forged)) by hz.grosbein.net (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 1AKI7XFE012841 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 20 Nov 2021 18:07:33 GMT (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) X-Envelope-From: eugen@grosbein.net X-Envelope-To: ml@netfence.it Received: from [10.58.0.10] (dadvw [10.58.0.10]) by eg.sd.rdtc.ru (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPS id 1AKI7WXQ098432 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT); Sun, 21 Nov 2021 01:07:32 +0700 (+07) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Subject: Re: ThunderBird and DAV calendars To: Andrea Venturoli , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: From: Eugene Grosbein Message-ID: Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2021 01:07:21 +0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,SHORTCIRCUIT autolearn=disabled version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Report: * -0.0 SHORTCIRCUIT No description available. * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on hz.grosbein.net X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4HxM2P5yh9z4XJP X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N 21.11.2021 0:11, Andrea Venturoli wrote: > > Hello. > > Is anyone here using ThunderBird and DAV calendars? > > After the upgrade to 91 I'm still able to use the calendars I had configured before, but I cannot add any new one, since the password prompt never appears. > I asked on Mozilla's ml, but they say it works (and in fact does, on Windows). > > So I'm trying, first of all, to find out whether this is: > _ a problem of mine; > _ a problem on FreeBSD; > _ a problem on X (I have no Linux to test). > > TIA to anyone who is willing to try. I don't have it under FreeBSD, but want to share a tip. Sometimes, dealing with obscure application problem, I run run an application under "ktrace -i" command to reproduce a problem then exit application. Then run "kdump | less" and investigate it. There are cases when application generates some error log/report/message and writes it to its child/parent/sibling over pipe/socket but the message ends up to nowhere. ktrace shows it, among with other data that may provide a clue. From nobody Sat Nov 20 18:15:53 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A83B4189AEA5 for ; Sat, 20 Nov 2021 18:15:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from soth.netfence.it (mailserver.netfence.it [78.134.96.152]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mailserver.netfence.it", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HxMCw2XrRz4c5d; Sat, 20 Nov 2021 18:15:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from [10.1.2.18] (alamar.local.netfence.it [10.1.2.18]) (authenticated bits=0) by soth.netfence.it (8.17.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPSA id 1AKIFrwN006132 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Sat, 20 Nov 2021 19:15:53 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) X-Authentication-Warning: soth.netfence.it: Host alamar.local.netfence.it [10.1.2.18] claimed to be [10.1.2.18] Message-ID: <2b02103e-1f12-ca3e-ddf8-60e5986e267f@netfence.it> Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2021 19:15:53 +0100 List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.3.0 Subject: Re: ThunderBird and DAV calendars Content-Language: en-US To: Guido Falsi , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <900125bd-fa5d-bf3b-b809-d683196b3ad4@FreeBSD.org> From: Andrea Venturoli In-Reply-To: <900125bd-fa5d-bf3b-b809-d683196b3ad4@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4HxMCw2XrRz4c5d X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-Spam: Yes X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N On 11/20/21 18:42, Guido Falsi wrote: > I'm observing the same issue, did not have time to try to diagnose it > though. Thanks for the answer. > Did you file a bug report in bugzilla so this can be tracked? Not yet. As I said, I'm trying to find out if this is a FreeBSD specific problem (in which case I'll report it to FreeBSD's bugzilla) or a more general X problem (in which case I need to report it to Mozilla). I assume you tried this on FreeBSD, not on Linux? bye av. From nobody Sat Nov 20 19:45:14 2021 X-Original-To: ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3428188B987 for ; Sat, 20 Nov 2021 19:45:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cmt@burggraben.net) Received: from smtp.burggraben.net (smtp.burggraben.net [IPv6:2a01:4f8:140:510a::3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.burggraben.net", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HxPC66tM5z3RJQ for ; Sat, 20 Nov 2021 19:45:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cmt@burggraben.net) Received: from elch.exwg.net (elch.exwg.net [IPv6:2001:470:7120:1:127b:44ff:fe4f:148d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "elch.exwg.net", Issuer "R3" (not verified)) by smtp.burggraben.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B8E1EC0030C for ; Sat, 20 Nov 2021 20:45:15 +0100 (CET) Received: by elch.exwg.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 8D64F3AB31; Sat, 20 Nov 2021 20:45:14 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2021 20:45:14 +0100 From: Christoph Moench-Tegeder To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ThunderBird and DAV calendars Message-ID: References: List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/2.1.3 (2021-09-10) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4HxPC66tM5z3RJQ X-Spamd-Bar: ++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of cmt@burggraben.net designates 2a01:4f8:140:510a::3 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=cmt@burggraben.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [2.50 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FREEFALL_USER(0.00)[cmt]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a01:4f8:140:510a::3]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[ports@freebsd.org]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(1.00)[1.000]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[burggraben.net]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(1.00)[0.996]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED(-0.20)[2a01:4f8:140:510a::3:from]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(1.00)[1.000]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:2a01:4f8::/32, country:DE]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N ## Andrea Venturoli (ml@netfence.it): > After the upgrade to 91 I'm still able to use the calendars I had > configured before, but I cannot add any new one, since the password > prompt never appears. Right, it's broken, and I see how it's broken. Regards, Christoph -- Spare Space From nobody Sat Nov 20 21:55:50 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 375A418A3FDC for ; Sat, 20 Nov 2021 21:56:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.e.sanliturk@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vk1-xa33.google.com (mail-vk1-xa33.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::a33]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1D4" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HxS6M0hQqz4st2; Sat, 20 Nov 2021 21:56:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.e.sanliturk@gmail.com) Received: by mail-vk1-xa33.google.com with SMTP id s17so7930918vka.5; Sat, 20 Nov 2021 13:56:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=FCu3665JRzt55eaCs/gpkm+Y0dDCyNGijJJ5dDpnzHQ=; b=ft+tGGmbwVsa/oYPzXsWenbt2jYlk6NzR4PdrO/6+PmuegjxE9XRNUssfOm4WwqdVr mJKAZrMvjj/+ROFAXus2hyH8cgKGKz/m4AHXOPzk1PXMUlPZZvzrUWdmhD5isLRXX+CS 2ENbUDUs/NouZCFAlaPpHuOTHsQipfZ4s7imPgzZXLBIAK5Af3eeeFPMp8KLTMVkv/Ch IwOovFYGT8RamjbZCZUdzqelxSEOQMbVhS9oibKUPCtA95bzuebenc9FhrGQiRfOlJIq S6F4jp/9CI8NYDDwZVcY9QD9nAA3L57q1KjHEpEjkI4N5eVt0Z4m45/cmP5Anu3yjz9T L18g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=FCu3665JRzt55eaCs/gpkm+Y0dDCyNGijJJ5dDpnzHQ=; b=iYSTdyQwYJ9eWZAtl22WsohRgAh2IT0+p3rAG3PrRGJLomWtSxSkkeFmfHWLinHcWg WnHkhedjPm00eiBsb7ftw5gm2rJ/LukhCqF4Y8hNIseyYJrPPOHh3tN5ftlmOUus/SFS Zq2J5cpYbN5U2Qmdak9ONgBTFCli9841UDr/sr2whd2Z6WXLUOIg413aiQzMFLAr9xD3 GUA6gvAKISoe0UFzCpUU1kwxNk9onF8L2rVeT6FSH2u5t9NZUnMvc0SKI/yAtNjYcwBk llRexk7O2roMN/TVCVwa1Ky/d0Ul3mpDPrbVnslaxYm/VWbKtpNFaeLCfCMbmyBL72lT xPow== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530lWRdAunqOpuXy6F2oJ1JCFpkTglsycrEw5nLIvsWdgWk90jE8 BT5Ard9pgnQmLFgGBNiGWpoe9B4J/k/qsjO2bKq9C22P X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwbqCLuGJQDF7FTECHqbNOe649kyKzGCdzgoS33GmWK+vAbSevXDR95rKzuBYMlaou+se4A0jBtdQrvJDSNFXk= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6122:221f:: with SMTP id bb31mr138394390vkb.23.1637445386665; Sat, 20 Nov 2021 13:56:26 -0800 (PST) List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <900125bd-fa5d-bf3b-b809-d683196b3ad4@FreeBSD.org> <2b02103e-1f12-ca3e-ddf8-60e5986e267f@netfence.it> In-Reply-To: <2b02103e-1f12-ca3e-ddf8-60e5986e267f@netfence.it> From: Mehmet Erol Sanliturk Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2021 00:55:50 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: ThunderBird and DAV calendars To: Andrea Venturoli Cc: Guido Falsi , FreeBSD Ports List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000009c846905d13f7650" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4HxS6M0hQqz4st2 X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: Y --0000000000009c846905d13f7650 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" The Thunderbird is not working under Fedora 25 . Fedora 25 is old , but the existing package of it in Fedora 25 *.rpm repository does not contain a working executable , which means there is a serious problem that it could not be updated . I do not know the new Fedora packages because my newest Fedora is 25 . Mehmet Erol Sanliturk On Sat, Nov 20, 2021 at 9:16 PM Andrea Venturoli wrote: > > On 11/20/21 18:42, Guido Falsi wrote: > > > I'm observing the same issue, did not have time to try to diagnose it > > though. > > Thanks for the answer. > > > > > Did you file a bug report in bugzilla so this can be tracked? > > Not yet. > As I said, I'm trying to find out if this is a FreeBSD specific problem > (in which case I'll report it to FreeBSD's bugzilla) or a more general X > problem (in which case I need to report it to Mozilla). > > I assume you tried this on FreeBSD, not on Linux? > > > > bye > av. > > --0000000000009c846905d13f7650-- From nobody Sun Nov 21 09:41:00 2021 X-Original-To: ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0042E1891703 for ; Sun, 21 Nov 2021 09:41:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from soth.netfence.it (mailserver.netfence.it [78.134.96.152]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mailserver.netfence.it", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HxllM51vzz3knX for ; Sun, 21 Nov 2021 09:41:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from [10.1.2.18] (alamar.local.netfence.it [10.1.2.18]) (authenticated bits=0) by soth.netfence.it (8.17.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPSA id 1AL9f0eE038131 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 21 Nov 2021 10:41:01 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=netfence.it; s=202108; t=1637487661; bh=Egmc2aqUDhaPmygHsSJGbQ37/KhINnaoNn/eTvmurjk=; h=Date:Subject:To:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=F/11IOYnLo9PzliNi1jfzjwn8vH1XQcPRYe62dAlUlM7/a1VWsaMZ1saP5xkD9EXw ger3ewWNSE+TxKULQ7s6/KrUf5FAAOxdpYqgYyQ5osB3J8t2NK/EzVXAbYnFLezYRq 4anOtqeyJSlZ+77bJAF51azeRiwJZlb/ppAf27vk= X-Authentication-Warning: soth.netfence.it: Host alamar.local.netfence.it [10.1.2.18] claimed to be [10.1.2.18] Message-ID: Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2021 10:41:00 +0100 List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.3.0 Subject: Re: ThunderBird and DAV calendars Content-Language: en-US To: ports@freebsd.org References: From: Andrea Venturoli In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4HxllM51vzz3knX X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=netfence.it header.s=202108 header.b="F/11IOYn"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=netfence.it; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of ml@netfence.it designates 78.134.96.152 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=ml@netfence.it X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.48 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[netfence.it:s=202108]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.51)[-0.514]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:78.134.96.152]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; HAS_XAW(0.00)[]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[ports@freebsd.org]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.99)[0.989]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[netfence.it:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[netfence.it,none]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(1.00)[1.000]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:35612, ipnet:78.134.0.0/17, country:IT]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N On 11/20/21 20:45, Christoph Moench-Tegeder wrote: > I see how it's broken. You mean you know where the problem lies and how to solve? bye & Thanks av. From nobody Mon Nov 22 01:57:56 2021 X-Original-To: ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83398188F25D; Mon, 22 Nov 2021 01:57:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pauamma@gundo.com) Received: from mail.gundo.com (gibson.gundo.com [75.145.166.65]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Hy9QZ0Sr4z513S; Mon, 22 Nov 2021 01:57:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pauamma@gundo.com) Received: from webmail.gundo.com (variax.gundo.com [75.145.166.70]) by mail.gundo.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5192B4C03FA; Sun, 21 Nov 2021 19:57:57 -0600 (CST) List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2021 01:57:56 +0000 From: Pau Amma To: koobs@freebsd.org Cc: Maxim Sobolev , portmgr@freebsd.org, python@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Bringing back lang/python27 with few modules? In-Reply-To: <56cb1da0-311a-d498-f7a0-db2c0d11dca4@FreeBSD.org> References: <56cb1da0-311a-d498-f7a0-db2c0d11dca4@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.4.8 Message-ID: <2adfb8979b5477639f4b4a214ef88a90@gundo.com> X-Sender: pauamma@gundo.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Hy9QZ0Sr4z513S X-Spamd-Bar: + Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of pauamma@gundo.com designates 75.145.166.65 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=pauamma@gundo.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [1.73 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.57)[-0.574]; FREEFALL_USER(0.00)[pauamma]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+a]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[gundo.com]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_GOOD(0.00)[75.145.166.65:from]; RCPT_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.90)[0.900]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED(-0.20)[75.145.166.65:from]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.81)[0.807]; RCVD_NO_TLS_LAST(0.10)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7922, ipnet:75.144.0.0/13, country:US]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-Spam: Yes X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N On 2021-11-18 01:37, Kubilay Kocak wrote: > We've had many user reports over the last year re the entire > situation, including a number recently about pypy in particular. Late to the discussion, but I'm sad that Chromium survived the Python2.7 removal and Iridium didn't. :-( From nobody Mon Nov 22 09:46:44 2021 X-Original-To: ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D472718985A4; Mon, 22 Nov 2021 09:46:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rene@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [96.47.72.132]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HyMqS5j05z3JH4; Mon, 22 Nov 2021 09:46:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rene@freebsd.org) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1637574404; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=7X4MvPXZ4IswL91l5i5J3fLDz+p/Cr3PwMmAOJ3cfHA=; b=VdeTNnKMqCPaqDPJQhFofbk8d/vs3C3e3rmxyyQVrW6a9DgZ71g6gfV0uxfoj+hz2xMG6z 5QW8fqdEwdgEgZvfJkxk5vK+gAbPFXHnVHkg3iS9Euz3+Hk9LU9uN/BM0B5xzD10GLIGwl rh0+pagT2CfT+pdsHGC7LjsMxguXDPDNAvNioZE0f6U8CDnG56w/TvFraqPrn1UE9n0rWL XI4nj8h/j1PkymPbMLHCPxjIN1D/r0o+q97d64RizvZp6vENoodr26Siey48lDcXtBD+8m 8oDFoIiJhDIrQsB1TP+mv87ZJYBGbcX2JVmTb5QOYw3MjFCC2W6LhD96a/SdYw== Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1185) id B01B71D2BA; Mon, 22 Nov 2021 09:46:44 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2021 09:46:44 +0000 From: Rene Ladan To: Pau Amma Cc: koobs@freebsd.org, Maxim Sobolev , portmgr@freebsd.org, python@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Bringing back lang/python27 with few modules? Message-ID: References: <56cb1da0-311a-d498-f7a0-db2c0d11dca4@FreeBSD.org> <2adfb8979b5477639f4b4a214ef88a90@gundo.com> List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <2adfb8979b5477639f4b4a214ef88a90@gundo.com> ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1637574404; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=7X4MvPXZ4IswL91l5i5J3fLDz+p/Cr3PwMmAOJ3cfHA=; b=ninepvEaYC6U6VXnoNbRa7Wbn3Tm7XnDnrAzy/Ay/YIOphGOrFClJDQXkTzOCIukAE60NZ PLWo6+JQxUnZ8y5X7EaP3pX3skH6VQvCYP0bw2HBM2WG3oHZxtqAup/6201SymSpciUqOk UWwrs74IVhSnpd9F1qX88i3Zc8PmNXdoUXPL4I8XiX9lxFh73WdPvdxSvt4dMnCUZlT6GV 8dshhVWc0aHX1yRdog1uLH1nx6TgswnzJ9rAwYRqkLNe3/RtBF3no3dydDfr6x1xXBZcx6 V4cxNCYUbQcGZJ9R1pRnOn/MuKcAr2xkalm8MOafq8LlI8p/5FLiDVptP7Rl7Q== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1637574404; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=JzIVfVn+XAbCHcTsVAoXSn9SFDxcZjapp4bzhH2OVNlR/FDn0gB3cZVt6A/R+Jy2mJeAn1 Ozs2rCevb9/DECsh9LGc0FltHS7BCS6VOoRz2k6FHRjiU++0a5DlH6s5CMMOLG1XEGZY5R 6DRj+OTSZHuTrdiltnN1Dm7PqoBTApfFu+OjI9dKjJ6eVZJpS0i7WowmIooqWx8rP6+/8l dyyQ6O3dGpf7BVQm9RpaXkM+t7xU5Ox+L/VVO8XIutGClmEkTHXS36ZNMgSRHcjFkbLCtT F0ecvRAIr4Yibni4SRRvF3nvTHZbrhfV1Vi417bLOIdlDwRZ+zloLkQYumXWOQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 01:57:56AM +0000, Pau Amma wrote: > On 2021-11-18 01:37, Kubilay Kocak wrote: > > We've had many user reports over the last year re the entire > > situation, including a number recently about pypy in particular. > > Late to the discussion, but I'm sad that Chromium survived the Python2.7 > removal and Iridium didn't. :-( Upstream Iridium always seems to lag behind Chromium for a bit, but it is doing OK now I geuss (one major version behind). The problem with Iridium is also volunteer time to keep the port up to date, one Chromium-like port is already a lot. René From nobody Mon Nov 22 14:19:19 2021 X-Original-To: ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 952A6188932A for ; Mon, 22 Nov 2021 14:19:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HyTsz3qhJz4RF2 for ; Mon, 22 Nov 2021 14:19:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (portscout.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 63A5824129 for ; Mon, 22 Nov 2021 14:19:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.nyi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.10]) by portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 1AMEJJ0Q014322 for ; Mon, 22 Nov 2021 14:19:19 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 1AMEJJtf014321; Mon, 22 Nov 2021 14:19:19 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <202111221419.1AMEJJtf014321@portscout.nyi.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.nyi.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2021 14:19:19 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ biology/phyml | 3.3.20200621 | v3.3.20211118 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ editors/ghostwriter | 1.8.1 | 2.1.0 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ textproc/py-markups | 3.1.2 | 3.1.3 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Reported by: portscout! From nobody Mon Nov 22 18:46:35 2021 X-Original-To: ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F76A1888D4A for ; Mon, 22 Nov 2021 18:46:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from SRS0=w/G6=QJ=quip.cz=000.fbsd@elsa.codelab.cz) Received: from elsa.codelab.cz (elsa.codelab.cz [94.124.105.4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Hybpb0p3bz3mrV; Mon, 22 Nov 2021 18:46:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from SRS0=w/G6=QJ=quip.cz=000.fbsd@elsa.codelab.cz) Received: from elsa.codelab.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by elsa.codelab.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF1812842B; Mon, 22 Nov 2021 19:46:38 +0100 (CET) Received: from illbsd.quip.test (ip-78-45-215-131.net.upcbroadband.cz [78.45.215.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by elsa.codelab.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 81E3B28417; Mon, 22 Nov 2021 19:46:36 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: Bringing back lang/python27 with few modules? To: Rene Ladan , Pau Amma Cc: koobs@freebsd.org, Maxim Sobolev , portmgr@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org References: <56cb1da0-311a-d498-f7a0-db2c0d11dca4@FreeBSD.org> <2adfb8979b5477639f4b4a214ef88a90@gundo.com> From: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> Message-ID: Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2021 19:46:35 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Hybpb0p3bz3mrV X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N On 22/11/2021 10:46, Rene Ladan wrote: > On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 01:57:56AM +0000, Pau Amma wrote: >> On 2021-11-18 01:37, Kubilay Kocak wrote: >>> We've had many user reports over the last year re the entire >>> situation, including a number recently about pypy in particular. >> >> Late to the discussion, but I'm sad that Chromium survived the Python2.7 >> removal and Iridium didn't. :-( > > Upstream Iridium always seems to lag behind Chromium for a bit, but it is > doing OK now I geuss (one major version behind). The problem with Iridium > is also volunteer time to keep the port up to date, one Chromium-like port > is already a lot. Even if you are OK with Chromium, there are users for which Chromium is not an option and Iridium is more than just preferable. (or Ungoogled, or Brave or something else not so heavily tied to Google spying / tracking) Removing Iridium was a really bad step. Kind regards Miroslav Lachman From nobody Mon Nov 22 19:58:11 2021 X-Original-To: ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4725188D728 for ; Mon, 22 Nov 2021 19:58:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pfg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::24b:4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HydP14p88z4fY0 for ; Mon, 22 Nov 2021 19:58:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pfg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [IPV6:2800:484:537f:ac00:88af:f008:c938:2906] (unknown [IPv6:2800:484:537f:ac00:88af:f008:c938:2906]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: pfg) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 51B70A92C for ; Mon, 22 Nov 2021 19:58:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pfg@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <9bededba-67c6-faf4-8952-70a01f2a5ec3@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2021 14:58:11 -0500 List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.3.2 Subject: Re: Bringing back lang/python27 with few modules? Content-Language: en-US To: ports@freebsd.org References: <56cb1da0-311a-d498-f7a0-db2c0d11dca4@FreeBSD.org> <2adfb8979b5477639f4b4a214ef88a90@gundo.com> From: Pedro Giffuni Organization: FreeBSD In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N Sorry for top posting here: How about Tauthon ... a sort-of-maintained fork is better than maintaining 2.7 on our own. https://github.com/naftaliharris/tauthon Pedro. On 22/11/2021 13:46, Miroslav Lachman wrote: > On 22/11/2021 10:46, Rene Ladan wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 01:57:56AM +0000, Pau Amma wrote: >>> On 2021-11-18 01:37, Kubilay Kocak wrote: >>>> We've had many user reports over the last year re the entire >>>> situation, including a number recently about pypy in particular. >>> >>> Late to the discussion, but I'm sad that Chromium survived the >>> Python2.7 >>> removal and Iridium didn't. :-( >> >> Upstream Iridium always seems to lag behind Chromium for a bit, but >> it is >> doing OK now I geuss (one major version behind). The problem with >> Iridium >> is also volunteer time to keep the port up to date, one Chromium-like >> port >> is already a lot. > > Even if you are OK with Chromium, there are users for which Chromium > is not an option and Iridium is more than just preferable. (or > Ungoogled, or Brave or something else not so heavily tied to Google > spying / tracking) > > Removing Iridium was a really bad step. > > Kind regards > Miroslav Lachman > From nobody Mon Nov 22 20:07:37 2021 X-Original-To: ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F2471895321 for ; Mon, 22 Nov 2021 20:07:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@freebsd.org) Received: from fc.opsec.eu (fc.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200:4::4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Hydc249tZz4kmb; Mon, 22 Nov 2021 20:07:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@freebsd.org) Received: from pi by fc.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.95 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1mpFbF-000CBH-Bh; Mon, 22 Nov 2021 21:07:37 +0100 Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2021 21:07:37 +0100 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Pedro Giffuni Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Bringing back lang/python27 with few modules? Message-ID: References: <56cb1da0-311a-d498-f7a0-db2c0d11dca4@FreeBSD.org> <2adfb8979b5477639f4b4a214ef88a90@gundo.com> <9bededba-67c6-faf4-8952-70a01f2a5ec3@FreeBSD.org> List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <9bededba-67c6-faf4-8952-70a01f2a5ec3@FreeBSD.org> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Hydc249tZz4kmb X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-Spam: Yes X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N Hi! > How about Tauthon ... a sort-of-maintained fork is better than maintaining > 2.7 on our own. > > https://github.com/naftaliharris/tauthon See the palemoon PR, where this is part of the debate: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251117 -- pi@FreeBSD.org +49 171 3101372 Now what ? From nobody Tue Nov 23 08:57:42 2021 X-Original-To: ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 455E7188930A for ; Tue, 23 Nov 2021 08:57:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rene@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [96.47.72.132]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HyyhR1V9fz4pTD; Tue, 23 Nov 2021 08:57:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rene@freebsd.org) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1637657863; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Q69lFDJeJkCSKWTOh5/Mn5LtU5OpiFr/dcQ1JL5R14s=; b=OHDGBt0CZJlo+ruR5RvlcF8TEWwWwxac2vMbtqkeToPBfs+Q9+l6iSrMmxLnPIynSExxQ5 ShLUy+SBHMREdd9RXdBlnR4bbxfQ2BxY0X557AvTAeBZZsN41Gzz6PKhK78deXYxYwpjIE qLvQM0/72LCUXrcaxft0OSEfw2ZD6PkO0rxRZh1OJPxSftrOseJWAlEcdqDOEBGUVXYrIi M9WxEqvptfNRicRIcai79T/x7/wUGWC5eEnCfTs5NWwf75OqmM1MqnRn5IZ3OJWOX+HPLa uh1gmPFSnxmlavNf1xoMxD7mPF1L4QQHlek2U4CfTyDzYpjXYv9rRU1waAPjMQ== Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1185) id 12E9A2293; Tue, 23 Nov 2021 08:57:43 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2021 08:57:42 +0000 From: Rene Ladan To: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> Cc: Pau Amma , koobs@freebsd.org, Maxim Sobolev , portmgr@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Bringing back lang/python27 with few modules? Message-ID: References: <56cb1da0-311a-d498-f7a0-db2c0d11dca4@FreeBSD.org> <2adfb8979b5477639f4b4a214ef88a90@gundo.com> List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1637657863; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Q69lFDJeJkCSKWTOh5/Mn5LtU5OpiFr/dcQ1JL5R14s=; b=s8zdg+X01W18rbHTUnoXiI7XGfrdW74Qjmm6AyJpi/eA60zfR5fZrA+t9T6n6K2bGLLoUh BPAWAnYrSEWqpCxhxEi+RGBLP9Fq21wxmY+X1zS/JkEYNqPBXp3n3v5Q961yOLnfXlvh4x OGTK1bbs3yc23BhUb1JDDyFHGhhg0GfQ+bdkrVI4gtVFtSq3/m6c93T5jpSzxvgDwV50nC 4ZUIRBo6py/tlBI/Nk2Uu4sgVlXrnPDfPC6ppBpKXVhnj4Sn5TWFkNazyHdBR7oFfd001A i6Rl3BhUi5YY88aBUjh6LsLYVPgpfE8+Y/DeaQQ4UC+UZtpZ95aaaKDRkIIiMA== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1637657863; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=yauywajqMUO9TkUIpnIWHrAn9wOryWzguEW80ZJq3yAh3dwMOGX/ane/K3rMYyGfgB5AOo 3wT7IC12LT3HoaAqf2r42rcwImdgQq9c5uXoMoAaIjwMFLfyGKEWThOia5/MrL0AcTFeID bgWNP7zv4XhQZ4YiYB7PHVSslXNU2yy3BIzbWwWzAsgujOWPWUrIwdWz8TB1AFRWQNXjY+ dqYrZFdqxsr2/dxhfvHIhfjmty0ORwz8n7YGOJG9WWfpaxjN+OwFjjy8DO6GblQo0M1+qw 4uBuWuqG3Mk1+e0sxz65EJRInM6zK+LvrrW8359FmNT0zMrCgiGqsiiXNN8Btw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 07:46:35PM +0100, Miroslav Lachman wrote: > On 22/11/2021 10:46, Rene Ladan wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 01:57:56AM +0000, Pau Amma wrote: > >> On 2021-11-18 01:37, Kubilay Kocak wrote: > >>> We've had many user reports over the last year re the entire > >>> situation, including a number recently about pypy in particular. > >> > >> Late to the discussion, but I'm sad that Chromium survived the Python2.7 > >> removal and Iridium didn't. :-( > > > > Upstream Iridium always seems to lag behind Chromium for a bit, but it is > > doing OK now I geuss (one major version behind). The problem with Iridium > > is also volunteer time to keep the port up to date, one Chromium-like port > > is already a lot. > > Even if you are OK with Chromium, there are users for which Chromium is > not an option and Iridium is more than just preferable. (or Ungoogled, > or Brave or something else not so heavily tied to Google spying / tracking) > > Removing Iridium was a really bad step. > To all of those that keep complaining that Iridium got removed: feel free to bring it back and maintain it. Regards, René From nobody Tue Nov 23 09:07:59 2021 X-Original-To: ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0404718911CB for ; Tue, 23 Nov 2021 09:08:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@freebsd.org) Received: from fc.opsec.eu (fc.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200:4::4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HyywL6KZMz4tr5; Tue, 23 Nov 2021 09:08:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@freebsd.org) Received: from pi by fc.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.95 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1mpRmR-000Cpq-4S; Tue, 23 Nov 2021 10:07:59 +0100 Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2021 10:07:59 +0100 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Rene Ladan Cc: portmgr@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Bringing back lang/python27 with few modules? Message-ID: References: <56cb1da0-311a-d498-f7a0-db2c0d11dca4@FreeBSD.org> <2adfb8979b5477639f4b4a214ef88a90@gundo.com> List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4HyywL6KZMz4tr5 X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-Spam: Yes X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N Hello, > > Removing Iridium was a really bad step. > To all of those that keep complaining that Iridium got removed: > feel free to bring it back and maintain it. They were removed by you because they depended on python 2.7, so has the policy changed ? Can it be brought back ? 2020-12-31 www/iridium: Uses Python 2.7 which is EOLed upstream -- pi@FreeBSD.org +49 171 3101372 Now what ? From nobody Tue Nov 23 09:51:09 2021 X-Original-To: ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8017F18A84FC for ; Tue, 23 Nov 2021 09:51:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rene@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:6074::16:84]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Hyzt52qKtz3Qjw; Tue, 23 Nov 2021 09:51:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rene@freebsd.org) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1637661069; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=k3kSdufCpOSWgbh6th4j8ROjNsWCFggGk/WvpLSGeTs=; b=SYLn6yzLAZAROb3fsVDH7+cUI2+ALBqs/f8SM6xMPdujVil5Q7H/ja5mx/ONadYCLoPxNB 1nmDzPpB5Vr9olvEQYvveo22PDdOqAuQQn+N/g0JfmMze+RLyfD30ZrHyV9+DoVeD+AqCm pLmd1VSiXa+OQO058eI/lB7fikYOoWSDOHT2tOWRDikt+pAlh1/VAvEq3dHk48G6gXNiA3 nRqVsXH4/d3F9Jaru/q1PyzAmtyB9wSD4lk39wr6lW1kQlbwe1VXNDAsKm/MZEoUFWbA2y 5Vit9t692x4JULrJslZs5IYSf0kxaA1AhWeIkDalGMnWHk59vbjmwvm9p9xwNA== Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1185) id 49D45224F; Tue, 23 Nov 2021 09:51:09 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2021 09:51:09 +0000 From: Rene Ladan To: Kurt Jaeger Cc: portmgr@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Bringing back lang/python27 with few modules? Message-ID: References: <56cb1da0-311a-d498-f7a0-db2c0d11dca4@FreeBSD.org> <2adfb8979b5477639f4b4a214ef88a90@gundo.com> List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1637661069; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=k3kSdufCpOSWgbh6th4j8ROjNsWCFggGk/WvpLSGeTs=; b=jIWDKJox0bLld6BWmCyV4MHk7nOiu1uJ8Jz7NqG8KnCB9r53YpZO11Jq8LL9Js3SowhWGX b/aD0wAGPGqngGUtafSSV3Wu2dujNUgHrF7uOdPihRM6YZgQsQpWUxYJhEQiMx1mGsFcMh WdscLzJEWoNVJfZqtfXFAwcncMsdKsez+VqHeZimSzljd9PB9OjvTE/+9Vv+1gbxXAtEiN ncjY3pUiTB9xzWKqp3GPPSfX+tItPM2tsVBBI79OLqWHBMDJVSfQ6eiW3D9ieLRsHUV5PN FDX+FFVslPlDVGK2vIs2FZtFgmcoivYECQN1ICajsyI6iseZhDNZ16os1WC0lQ== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1637661069; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=t3KwQRQ+ByvTsvvCAW30A8wduJlreK5J8sDfSzrcpXh9Vku0Iiso0TY8hCiRsZ96rY2thF +J4sO7RxmwQLG5c69kFA5+qYzsgRlk1xvZCQLAy4SoECR6e4LD5WB7oeklS4/1CwcygJTW 4ei7DEHGStZNKbWVzN2uGqPDvAMyejSce80vNhFXSRGgyW1wbXZPhcIm1oMwHQKSGBOpq5 ULKdsLNKGKqO7P07xW+SCrvNkOjE8K7EHJser1pVYypaiYR6wZz/+n8x6rPRYADKGwrqcG 6LjsX9OFhzjd3SPgl7kRdGTdfFOavlJHyDC0gLn/HRtz2GvMCRuwqp7sqD/ofg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 10:07:59AM +0100, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > Hello, > > > > Removing Iridium was a really bad step. > > > To all of those that keep complaining that Iridium got removed: > > feel free to bring it back and maintain it. > > They were removed by you because they depended on python 2.7, > so has the policy changed ? Can it be brought back ? > > 2020-12-31 www/iridium: Uses Python 2.7 which is EOLed upstream > Ah, of course, as a Chromium clone it also needs Python 2.7 for now. That policy hasn't changed (not at large), but I can imagine a few exceptions. Regards, René > -- > pi@FreeBSD.org +49 171 3101372 Now what ? From nobody Tue Nov 23 09:54:18 2021 X-Original-To: ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDD7118A8BCC for ; Tue, 23 Nov 2021 09:54:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@freebsd.org) Received: from fc.opsec.eu (fc.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200:4::4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Hyzxl6PY1z3RJ2; Tue, 23 Nov 2021 09:54:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@freebsd.org) Received: from pi by fc.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.95 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1mpSVG-000Crt-1i; Tue, 23 Nov 2021 10:54:18 +0100 Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2021 10:54:18 +0100 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Rene Ladan Cc: portmgr@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Bringing back lang/python27 with few modules? Message-ID: References: <56cb1da0-311a-d498-f7a0-db2c0d11dca4@FreeBSD.org> <2adfb8979b5477639f4b4a214ef88a90@gundo.com> List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Hyzxl6PY1z3RJ2 X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-Spam: Yes X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N Hi! > > > > Removing Iridium was a really bad step. > > > To all of those that keep complaining that Iridium got removed: > > > feel free to bring it back and maintain it. > > They were removed by you because they depended on python 2.7, > > so has the policy changed ? Can it be brought back ? > > 2020-12-31 www/iridium: Uses Python 2.7 which is EOLed upstream > Ah, of course, as a Chromium clone it also needs Python 2.7 for now. > That policy hasn't changed (not at large), but I can imagine a few > exceptions. So, did the policy change ? Would bringing back Iridium be OK ? What about palemoon ? Yes, I now, it's annoying to nag portmgr@ about it, but having some options for browsers is worth the unpureness of the ports tree 8-) -- pi@FreeBSD.org +49 171 3101372 Now what ? From nobody Tue Nov 23 15:07:17 2021 X-Original-To: ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7841D1888A66 for ; Tue, 23 Nov 2021 15:07:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from SRS0=L5lp=QK=quip.cz=000.fbsd@elsa.codelab.cz) Received: from elsa.codelab.cz (elsa.codelab.cz [94.124.105.4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Hz6ty24vBz4nGm; Tue, 23 Nov 2021 15:07:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from SRS0=L5lp=QK=quip.cz=000.fbsd@elsa.codelab.cz) Received: from elsa.codelab.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by elsa.codelab.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF44C28417; Tue, 23 Nov 2021 16:07:18 +0100 (CET) Received: from illbsd.quip.test (ip-78-45-215-131.net.upcbroadband.cz [78.45.215.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by elsa.codelab.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 004122842E; Tue, 23 Nov 2021 16:07:17 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: Bringing back lang/python27 with few modules? To: Kurt Jaeger , Rene Ladan Cc: portmgr@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org References: <56cb1da0-311a-d498-f7a0-db2c0d11dca4@FreeBSD.org> <2adfb8979b5477639f4b4a214ef88a90@gundo.com> From: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> Message-ID: <50f1762a-df98-c5fc-49ee-a954ba133149@quip.cz> Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2021 16:07:17 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Hz6ty24vBz4nGm X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N On 23/11/2021 10:54, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > Hi! > >>>>> Removing Iridium was a really bad step. > >>>> To all of those that keep complaining that Iridium got removed: >>>> feel free to bring it back and maintain it. > >>> They were removed by you because they depended on python 2.7, >>> so has the policy changed ? Can it be brought back ? > >>> 2020-12-31 www/iridium: Uses Python 2.7 which is EOLed upstream > >> Ah, of course, as a Chromium clone it also needs Python 2.7 for now. >> That policy hasn't changed (not at large), but I can imagine a few >> exceptions. > > So, did the policy change ? Would bringing back Iridium be OK ? > > What about palemoon ? > > Yes, I now, it's annoying to nag portmgr@ about it, but having > some options for browsers is worth the unpureness of the ports tree 8-) What unpureness are we talking about? That maintained just because of Chromium and parts of KDE still depending on Python 2.7? If it is unpureness then it makes more sense to have this unpureness because of more ports needs Python 2.7, not just a few chosen. (chosen without any written policy / criteria definition). Iridium and some other ports have had stay there for a whole year the same way as Chromium did. Nothing changed and we still have / need Python 2.7 because of these ports. Saying "feel free to bring it back " is very vague statement. Kind regards Miroslav Lachman From nobody Tue Nov 23 22:20:58 2021 X-Original-To: ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B052218ADC98 for ; Tue, 23 Nov 2021 22:21:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::24b:4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HzJWL4d1xz3NN7; Tue, 23 Nov 2021 22:21:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [192.168.0.88] (unknown [195.64.148.76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: avg/mail) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E2F5B277C8; Tue, 23 Nov 2021 22:21:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2021 00:20:58 +0200 List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/91.0 Thunderbird/91.3.0 Subject: Re: Bringing back lang/python27 with few modules? Content-Language: en-US To: Kurt Jaeger , Rene Ladan Cc: portmgr@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org References: <56cb1da0-311a-d498-f7a0-db2c0d11dca4@FreeBSD.org> <2adfb8979b5477639f4b4a214ef88a90@gundo.com> From: Andriy Gapon In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1637706062; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=7SIKU9C4ptFqmnyB2aaSgbXB/Lz+xmFXKXYkem4IxVw=; b=aZzsILnB306VPHcejdkBHz6dYpaQe/RYdxtTUCS9LvJxMhs0RFetbfVMP+k/SOmUX2C9N+ 8CLYi6sHdmfgDiWoHmBl1Ooxd756Nmonradfyy+HF/j7Kzm9h+EPAozSVkDb/lIT9XUqmX aDceubc0gvudl65Vfi+/AZzXKbZ69qY+ccT8bfAVDa2bmQNSyQIE7ER0coMMJ2IGNGO1GH Xk+8ngSBx8Mw/myMdpjT9KK10LxYTO3lhXbVtIoFUuNU/+WhctoLSG7jYPbzDcwTBU38hb WX9EuTrMk8BPFEoTERn0La1iG61Irl+rDoYGDvsvzzImaM6Vg+/VxBZhYq7/VA== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1637706062; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=nyEfXMbvB7F0k6BzZlrf2synXXFdmd7VcJFeb1mix9MmarXBw0/uHdMkyxv5GCYYiEiMK6 OBzsIDe25qfwRxavpECSatQVqnQ42N3Y7q1KN/p76ga0n/nAEabfQpIXkW9JtSYqPG1hWb cb807NQ6zJU2FF2yt4QU173TF48duBBU/xD2IDz9qL4MTDUH9/c6KorvfPJpIG57tQqyGB Mv/HmwTChlCxcQbS+C+bsqPwHYPpEMYveOyk/uRW8RrvpMI7YEuGBsOIz+yx2am4MaExZl 1gfn8CihySuVV9kx0Ho4pq46NZ4t4mcdQVFrKLm5cV1AWmeQzD2Jwuawy5j18w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N As a general observation, there is a concept of "too big to fail". As we can see, it applies not only to companies but to ports as well. Or in other words, quod licet Iovi, non licet bovi. And that's reasonable. -- Andriy Gapon From nobody Wed Nov 24 14:15:42 2021 X-Original-To: ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17EE8189284C for ; Wed, 24 Nov 2021 14:15:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Hzjhv52dDz4Wfq for ; Wed, 24 Nov 2021 14:15:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (portscout.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3448537B7 for ; Wed, 24 Nov 2021 14:15:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.nyi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.10]) by portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 1AOEFg2k017178 for ; Wed, 24 Nov 2021 14:15:42 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 1AOEFgWp017177; Wed, 24 Nov 2021 14:15:42 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <202111241415.1AOEFgWp017177@portscout.nyi.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.nyi.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2021 14:15:42 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1637763343; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding; bh=7+AMcAggNftnwe4zqBS8aHlva4VuqZOpTXiEVWXbrLU=; b=A92ZHP1I8r7phEgKj3Sj3GfUThsd2K+TGKDqXvYUZGQf6JUZ6FaKI/3v6xpM5qks3leJuT O/Uw5E5NI4RqPRF+TAzqLvEkA+GohzdMO2DflmWAVsjVmjOoqIKkC/eEEt4qumoMmC+d4n FVfREzXmtBk1TfbriHPVYuq/P0rHyTYftvNCFQuUxrmKd56Wak3M9f3YNvZO0T+P96f82m URrf5flyPvNKTX3ES/CETkQIjqsnR3G7QUPAvZOvKPlsTwem6i3lZdNEjPFl1NL44BaT9H 4qj7TBPk0xiLFRAM7G8Fb3ws1K/bfxTOvWTJXtyRRCOfAhLjKgPA47TmY4nQog== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1637763343; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=hooPA86tOAyfqNy3yi/ctH5rYZqP2+aPGV9DfCyXAgfN9KUia3egvUlsNXTRrlhMm/5X52 SBRS5qApToangieV9t1EGpn992oxJjXCyTitvEeQ7lfDU8gmMSiT7usVuWPFm+dp7TRi1D kvF0BtIzsuJwYlRy99/qE0XDeQ7HbN7QDdyV/F5sjRcmgxN+BlFLXykqT0V+QWqRE0jEMD WcgciRhcECpW/kGESJqhl7U3uOrnJA92IcoLaAfSNWT4BlJROOtgRaHwLZ514WfDUxcVFm GAfN+dUHj1mQDgusu0bMuC/yEUte1665sQxyciXXpu/3ira7S+uQN2jnxyCH3g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ devel/tinygo | 0.19.0 | v0.21.0 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Reported by: portscout! From nobody Wed Nov 24 16:37:03 2021 X-Original-To: ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1986218A023E for ; Wed, 24 Nov 2021 16:37:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alexvpetrov@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lf1-x134.google.com (mail-lf1-x134.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::134]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1D4" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Hzmr414Kcz4SrP; Wed, 24 Nov 2021 16:37:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alexvpetrov@gmail.com) Received: by mail-lf1-x134.google.com with SMTP id m27so8734336lfj.12; Wed, 24 Nov 2021 08:37:08 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:to:cc:subject :content-language:from:content-transfer-encoding; bh=t8Q8ybhzGxqubF3fjuc6njE5q2AL1kRYDOA9/mNgMN0=; b=n2XIAhtiCj/v8SuLA6WzhoXAFQWsDjXipjgWCj2q0ULDM3DGx0Fgpa+SAYX5xUlnrZ 5z5PS07TJAc6YJHME67wcS/tsranOMHcEbXktWJX2ycdr2w6HcJ1t2WQhFcS3ReLnglr GHlXecaKXvZjX87aHhDSF8viaXT/2Sn0epPjbKxHqdRRdQwmjXQE8/OpXiWDmQUVIXOh WDJGdLNlLOAFZiDJWtQddkfnQc+IGNVcq+LdDJWiBAnSpjIRJDPHb8QHL7pFASwgnqpi DbbIe/xqYLOizhUJZC+EKhRcHUbenBstqpm6KE+nKv7gQNUcjnE5X1iSmb6eOh03Ts3U WdNg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:to:cc :subject:content-language:from:content-transfer-encoding; bh=t8Q8ybhzGxqubF3fjuc6njE5q2AL1kRYDOA9/mNgMN0=; b=R/B8oKlqFzxJIh7bH6o7Pla1KhodniY8YGk4RYD+waQW054dbAbI/SqRx6pe5qxkqH BA+N0mA5RzELJXGm2oZdG5NEJhP9GDDyLwNVRYwOKQ01h6Cz23ORn7jvhs+AtI6v/O+B qhlgUin2LD/1VV7ffKGn1eFRIQc38ZmHv3i7MDKqYPKiptvDkeiJisAxTwshXDqun+eV 8USGIh6hkPkGWB5OAh9Nygb7dfCTSTMRk8bVJyJoEB+fiOJ3vgNyzLQ2Jb8kSrztsfJC i0yPUR5DqwO4+pFc5NhX/aADTFWVuHdBKGfwRpmEi1cStmpQIeL0qhtdBqOZbiRP6DXo VtZg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532keI7zcZEkn6DQToy1sXLtc2G2PuSB8iOfwoNhIAmAxrZSk+NC dYQw3cSvRcVEuVMK7ekwru7vLs4uczk= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxo197ZqbNfiqiZZBY3gRrZHLzvZxS+vYiTCEkOOZH51/Y6rloq5gxnkxpFkBW1A1zyJPyT3Q== X-Received: by 2002:a19:495c:: with SMTP id l28mr16648078lfj.484.1637771826650; Wed, 24 Nov 2021 08:37:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.0.0.2] (stone.g-service.ru. [84.22.141.217]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id t25sm31653ljd.24.2021.11.24.08.37.05 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 24 Nov 2021 08:37:06 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2021 23:37:03 +0700 List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.3.2 To: tagattie@FreeBSD.org Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: FreeBSD Port: vscode-1.62.3 error register Content-Language: ru From: "Alex V. Petrov" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Hzmr414Kcz4SrP X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=n2XIAhti; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of alexvpetrov@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4864:20::134 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=alexvpetrov@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.88 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20210112]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.89)[-0.887]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a00:1450:4000::/36:c]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-0.998]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2a00:1450:4864:20::134:from]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2a00:1450::/32, country:US]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com:dkim] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N ===> Installing for vscode-1.62.3 ===> Checking if vscode is already installed ===> Registering installation for vscode-1.62.3 pkg-static: Unable to access file /usr/ports/editors/vscode/work/stage/usr/local/share/code-oss/resources/app/node_modules.asar.unpacked/@parcel/watcher/build/Release/watcher.node:No such file or directory pkg-static: Unable to access file /usr/ports/editors/vscode/work/stage/usr/local/share/code-oss/resources/app/node_modules.asar.unpacked/@vscode/sqlite3/build/Release/sqlite.node:No such file or directory pkg-static: Unable to access file /usr/ports/editors/vscode/work/stage/usr/local/share/code-oss/resources/app/node_modules.asar.unpacked/keytar/build/Release/keytar.node:No such file or directory pkg-static: Unable to access file /usr/ports/editors/vscode/work/stage/usr/local/share/code-oss/resources/app/node_modules.asar.unpacked/keytar/build/Release/obj.target/keytar.node:No such file or directory pkg-static: Unable to access file /usr/ports/editors/vscode/work/stage/usr/local/share/code-oss/resources/app/node_modules.asar.unpacked/native-is-elevated/build/Release/iselevated.node:No such file or directory pkg-static: Unable to access file /usr/ports/editors/vscode/work/stage/usr/local/share/code-oss/resources/app/node_modules.asar.unpacked/native-keymap/build/Release/keymapping.node:No such file or directory pkg-static: Unable to access file /usr/ports/editors/vscode/work/stage/usr/local/share/code-oss/resources/app/node_modules.asar.unpacked/native-watchdog/build/Release/watchdog.node:No such file or directory pkg-static: Unable to access file /usr/ports/editors/vscode/work/stage/usr/local/share/code-oss/resources/app/node_modules.asar.unpacked/node-pty/build/Release/pty.node:No such file or directory pkg-static: Unable to access file /usr/ports/editors/vscode/work/stage/usr/local/share/code-oss/resources/app/node_modules.asar.unpacked/spdlog/build/Release/spdlog.node:No such file or directory pkg-static: Unable to access file /usr/ports/editors/vscode/work/stage/usr/local/share/code-oss/resources/app/node_modules.asar.unpacked/vscode-nsfw/build/Release/nsfw.node:No such file or directory pkg-static: Unable to access file /usr/ports/editors/vscode/work/stage/usr/local/share/code-oss/resources/app/node_modules.asar.unpacked/windows-foreground-love/build/Release/foreground_love.node:No such file or directory pkg-static: Unable to access file /usr/ports/editors/vscode/work/stage/usr/local/share/code-oss/resources/app/node_modules.asar.unpacked/windows-foreground-love/build/Release/obj.target/foreground_love.node:No such file or directory *** Error code 1 Stop. make: stopped in /usr/ports/editors/vscode -- ----- Alex. From nobody Wed Nov 24 18:21:45 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 253AD18900E9 for ; Wed, 24 Nov 2021 18:22:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from george+freebsd@m5p.com) Received: from mailhost.m5p.com (mailhost.m5p.com [74.104.188.4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "m5p.com", Issuer "R3" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Hzq93114rz3QHF for ; Wed, 24 Nov 2021 18:21:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from george+freebsd@m5p.com) Received: from [IPV6:2001:470:1f07:15ff::26] (court.m5p.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:15ff:0:0:0:26]) (authenticated bits=0) by mailhost.m5p.com (8.16.1/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id 1AOILjDr075130 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 24 Nov 2021 13:21:51 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from george+freebsd@m5p.com) Message-ID: <752add68-6868-84f3-91bc-777f40f103be@m5p.com> Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2021 13:21:45 -0500 List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.3.1 Content-Language: en-US To: freebsd ports From: George Mitchell Subject: WTF? (a/k/a Wow, am I ever slow on the uptake) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=10.0 tests=HELO_MISC_IP,HELO_NO_DOMAIN autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.5 (2021-03-20) on mattapan.m5p.com X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Hzq93114rz3QHF X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of george@m5p.com designates 74.104.188.4 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=george@m5p.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.23 / 15.00]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+a]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[m5p.com]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.04)[-0.040]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.01)[0.015]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.90)[-0.903]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; ASN(0.00)[asn:701, ipnet:74.104.0.0/16, country:US]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[freebsd]; SUBJECT_HAS_QUESTION(0.00)[] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N I just now noticed (finally?) that my local ports repo is gradually filling up with "*.pkg" files, and the "*.txz" files are turning into symbolic links. Everything is still working just fine, but I am feeling rather embarrassed that it took me so long (since before July 22, evidently) to catch on. What happened, and where was it documented? I still don't see anything in /usr/ports/UPDATING. -- George From nobody Wed Nov 24 19:14:53 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4A0618B2367 for ; Wed, 24 Nov 2021 19:15:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from soth.netfence.it (mailserver.netfence.it [78.134.96.152]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mailserver.netfence.it", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HzrLF6bf7z4cQD; Wed, 24 Nov 2021 19:15:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from [10.1.2.18] (alamar.local.netfence.it [10.1.2.18]) (authenticated bits=0) by soth.netfence.it (8.17.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPSA id 1AOJErnN044260 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 24 Nov 2021 20:14:53 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) X-Authentication-Warning: soth.netfence.it: Host alamar.local.netfence.it [10.1.2.18] claimed to be [10.1.2.18] Message-ID: <799d6594-777f-cbba-1577-53f5f174dc42@netfence.it> Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2021 20:14:53 +0100 List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.3.2 Subject: Re: ThunderBird and DAV calendars Content-Language: en-US From: Andrea Venturoli To: Guido Falsi , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <900125bd-fa5d-bf3b-b809-d683196b3ad4@FreeBSD.org> <2b02103e-1f12-ca3e-ddf8-60e5986e267f@netfence.it> In-Reply-To: <2b02103e-1f12-ca3e-ddf8-60e5986e267f@netfence.it> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4HzrLF6bf7z4cQD X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=netfence.it; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of ml@netfence.it designates 78.134.96.152 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=ml@netfence.it X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.80 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:78.134.96.152]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; HAS_XAW(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[netfence.it,none]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:35612, ipnet:78.134.0.0/17, country:IT]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-Spam: Yes X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N On 11/20/21 19:15, Andrea Venturoli wrote: >> Did you file a bug report in bugzilla so this can be tracked? > > Not yet. > As I said, I'm trying to find out if this is a FreeBSD specific problem > (in which case I'll report it to FreeBSD's bugzilla) or a more general X > problem (in which case I need to report it to Mozilla). https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=260033 bye av. From nobody Wed Nov 24 23:27:51 2021 X-Original-To: ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB2EC189E0E0 for ; Wed, 24 Nov 2021 23:27:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from grahamperrin@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wm1-x32b.google.com (mail-wm1-x32b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32b]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1D4" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Hzxxy6SG8z3lNH for ; Wed, 24 Nov 2021 23:27:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from grahamperrin@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wm1-x32b.google.com with SMTP id o19-20020a1c7513000000b0033a93202467so3378913wmc.2 for ; Wed, 24 Nov 2021 15:27:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject:content-language:to :references:from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=gP6MiqoogJsRqWmtWLfjawh0P/qFwPMtNflOadFeQd0=; b=K9NMnO5UrpseIr4ThX9JtkXy8rFF0db5G1lm7ZVSbxi8oDMKiBo03GFzaAzXfXvU7i 0qx3NZ8WvxorvImZJ7FKR8s65T7sXwAo9CWHutd6QhWIP11zo5AowPbTY7hd6Go0JpWF NlAvCSfwwrq86iVaPuyKTwJl4hl4KuoKyBJOd2xA6dUCzu41NDMy7rjpwAWizRPvnSiY 20yd8fM86KXV6lekBJPBYQXHNF9DJC1tV7nP2Bchk4IReEsg8drLlz0OSqBZgOAdEq6Z quEfIUku7HKH8dmg15w/7V5HwyOfVkIfzZQ2YIg6bk4awBMlW6gN/lpxEqeJoxxXj1GI Q1KA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject :content-language:to:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=gP6MiqoogJsRqWmtWLfjawh0P/qFwPMtNflOadFeQd0=; b=RG90wPpChaueOZE4YB18flN7GJ+2Gh5MAD+0Y4TXRVgTyIEazCWP41bq+N1rNIIDwN 5/HrRZ48+NAWHvV8FR++dMVEK3RzoZtS7EUeRkWNoJHM+Fo94tHTZ7deAb3BbKVibtRh 3JNH4LhevueHjPZXyubAcNvAlrjXB1s4FeX661yHTNEqE4ZbYBxtXMzt+sxSOIVwW1o0 8zrzPw97YLh46gAc2oSR86iZwzf1hyxsHea5LEWv64UfNWU8Xvn1P5BkUb+9g4Jk3dRc JHXZt0DcKWZs69ho9LUV8gN3OmFbuWbzqTgnghSTuKaQfdkPcV2/Jjec9NOywuomvy6Y D2ZA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532i8gQwPOxCdyK6U7dmlyT4RVOQahWkkkf2lUp3ozVpOVbVYpwv OvvMQOh6XDBJHm46IZB9JwCKRYWlC/+Kmg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwRWKQSm/zZDD7/Qf/81+RZMfzJhJgR+b28YZcFci4wLZPDO5xGM486nxiMEb3M+Vhoo2KCIA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:354f:: with SMTP id i15mr1118501wmq.59.1637796469328; Wed, 24 Nov 2021 15:27:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPV6:2001:470:1f1c:a0::2? (tunnel642390-pt.tunnel.tserv1.lon2.ipv6.he.net. [2001:470:1f1c:a0::2]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w2sm1085558wrn.67.2021.11.24.15.27.48 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 24 Nov 2021 15:27:48 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <09d16644-c17b-9750-3e7c-7d2f59d9d142@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2021 23:27:51 +0000 List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.3.0 Subject: Symlinking, and suffixing with .pkg (was: WTF? (a/k/a Wow, am I ever slow on the uptake)) Content-Language: en-GB To: ports@freebsd.org References: <752add68-6868-84f3-91bc-777f40f103be@m5p.com> From: Graham Perrin In-Reply-To: <752add68-6868-84f3-91bc-777f40f103be@m5p.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Hzxxy6SG8z3lNH X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=K9NMnO5U; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of grahamperrin@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4864:20::32b as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=grahamperrin@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a00:1450:4000::/36:c]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2a00:1450::/32, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; SUBJECT_HAS_QUESTION(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com:dkim]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20210112]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[ports@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2a00:1450:4864:20::32b:from]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N On 24/11/2021 18:21, George Mitchell wrote: > I just now noticed (finally?) that my local ports repo is gradually > filling up with "*.pkg" files, and the "*.txz" files are turning into > symbolic links.  Everything is still working just fine, but I am > feeling rather embarrassed that it took me so long (since before > July 22, evidently) to catch on.  What happened, and where was it > documented?  I still don't see anything in /usr/ports/UPDATING. > -- George > , this in particular: – as far as I know, use of symlinks began much earlier. The string that's inserted to the name of the file relates to SHA256. % pwd /var/cache/pkg % ls -hl kwinft* lrwxr-xr-x  1 root  wheel    28B 21 Nov 17:04 kwinft-5.23.0.pkg -> kwinft-5.23.0~81e88bb3e8.pkg -rw-r--r--  1 root  wheel   4.5M 11 Nov 09:22 kwinft-5.23.0~81e88bb3e8.pkg % sha256 kwinft-5.23.0~81e88bb3e8.pkg SHA256 (kwinft-5.23.0~81e88bb3e8.pkg) = 81e88bb3e8174cd15010a0adb7e124b453cad0ccbf170ca66cce0707576d2718 % From nobody Thu Nov 25 00:47:04 2021 X-Original-To: ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1177718AB5B0 for ; Thu, 25 Nov 2021 00:47:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from george+freebsd@m5p.com) Received: from mailhost.m5p.com (mailhost.m5p.com [74.104.188.4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "m5p.com", Issuer "R3" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HzzjX2XWRz4nQf for ; Thu, 25 Nov 2021 00:47:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from george+freebsd@m5p.com) Received: from [IPV6:2001:470:1f07:15ff::26] (court.m5p.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:15ff:0:0:0:26]) (authenticated bits=0) by mailhost.m5p.com (8.16.1/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id 1AP0l41U076891 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 24 Nov 2021 19:47:10 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from george+freebsd@m5p.com) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2021 19:47:04 -0500 List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.3.1 Subject: Re: Symlinking, and suffixing with .pkg (was: WTF? (a/k/a Wow, am I ever slow on the uptake)) Content-Language: en-US To: ports@freebsd.org References: <752add68-6868-84f3-91bc-777f40f103be@m5p.com> <09d16644-c17b-9750-3e7c-7d2f59d9d142@gmail.com> From: George Mitchell In-Reply-To: <09d16644-c17b-9750-3e7c-7d2f59d9d142@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=10.0 tests=HELO_MISC_IP,HELO_NO_DOMAIN, NICE_REPLY_A autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.5 (2021-03-20) on mattapan.m5p.com X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4HzzjX2XWRz4nQf X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of george@m5p.com designates 74.104.188.4 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=george@m5p.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.30 / 15.00]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+a]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[ports@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[m5p.com]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:701, ipnet:74.104.0.0/16, country:US]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[freebsd]; SUBJECT_HAS_QUESTION(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N On 11/24/21 18:27, Graham Perrin wrote: > [...] > , this in particular: > > > [...] Thanks. But I still couldn't find anything on the mailing list or in UPDATING to indicate that this substantial change was happening in pkg 1.17. Could the numerous (but seemingly harmless) "duplicate dependency" messages I started getting around that time whenever I did a "pkg upgrade" from my local repo be connected with that new version? -- George From nobody Thu Nov 25 05:04:31 2021 X-Original-To: ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EE901899EEA for ; Thu, 25 Nov 2021 05:04:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tagattie@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [96.47.72.83]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4J05QW2hRSz3GCt; Thu, 25 Nov 2021 05:04:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tagattie@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [IPV6:2409:11:22a0:8900::34] (unknown [IPv6:2409:11:22a0:8900::34]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: tagattie/mail) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 90A176A3C; Thu, 25 Nov 2021 05:04:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tagattie@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <1402bdae-cf0a-fd25-0341-709d9297a1a1@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2021 14:04:31 +0900 List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.2.1 Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: vscode-1.62.3 error register Content-Language: en-US To: "Alex V. Petrov" Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org References: From: Hiroki Tagato In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1637816675; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=ZXsMedmx4E8FYI/xT/LPeTnt3C95qnjlfKIHIHUzMX0=; b=l417FysXoDT2Rx4ky9CgQGV1S5iBGI9QNS0REesECa7O2aeruQWrx16/xIoYouwHKkQnR0 vX0kdMRLsysK2SgfeNVVZJicxzr+u2EeoH2gB0kptzWz6EckJy4Hg2We5kA0VHqxZTNtIg J6DYs/pinEoniHdRY2GCn2dPy93ITLC8a5Myke3w+7mmG9w5C+PJCSUGYHuB+vtr/MJFC0 Z6QTArTl11Bu7PGGNpQR4FuHjO1Fb4+EDXUFN83/GRBz1IoKfUGe6768eC3lk9h0THdpnm 7wIhZBVcmV/25kLsbiCl+zxSrk4dx5D5m5HiFiKNjYIAaezXhQHtV34BkKytmg== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1637816675; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=WBdKTNKC+TI4uHyxC5N6C+im1do2QJx4P5exHtgQk79WYBGlAkOsz7JSf/ysZQ7fPvt25G f1vao17SzsfUjKHo5nohjAQCrq5/LjFDqvsb2giyK/C4jYDD8vEHwMk9t0pZncNTfmf/2K dr3YEYrwYNsPPXm+vXxjYxFQ97n+JiWr1fTVFe8Z/QnRWsoYzD+G5BxzQfC2Rjm4aGipBm FQvvnUaF5cCKVq5WybbyuyP6wLcWlw+t3IFkNtvzoVm7YtSSQYp3r/t2ndcbWRq81KrvWN rCMeArY2W/h0VxgvIvmPoVix+k7VXmHfP2kmsxxYq+JtalyDaPehTB+CPG1Nzw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N Hi Alex, I have never seen this error before. It appears building native modules somehow failed. Can you provide a whole build log? It may be helpful for investigating the issue. Best regards, Hiroki On 2021/11/25 1:37, Alex V. Petrov wrote: > ===>  Installing for vscode-1.62.3 > ===>  Checking if vscode is already installed > ===>   Registering installation for vscode-1.62.3 > pkg-static: Unable to access file > /usr/ports/editors/vscode/work/stage/usr/local/share/code-oss/resources/app/node_modules.asar.unpacked/@parcel/watcher/build/Release/watcher.node:No > such file or directory > pkg-static: Unable to access file > /usr/ports/editors/vscode/work/stage/usr/local/share/code-oss/resources/app/node_modules.asar.unpacked/@vscode/sqlite3/build/Release/sqlite.node:No > such file or directory > pkg-static: Unable to access file > /usr/ports/editors/vscode/work/stage/usr/local/share/code-oss/resources/app/node_modules.asar.unpacked/keytar/build/Release/keytar.node:No > such file or directory > pkg-static: Unable to access file > /usr/ports/editors/vscode/work/stage/usr/local/share/code-oss/resources/app/node_modules.asar.unpacked/keytar/build/Release/obj.target/keytar.node:No > such file or directory > pkg-static: Unable to access file > /usr/ports/editors/vscode/work/stage/usr/local/share/code-oss/resources/app/node_modules.asar.unpacked/native-is-elevated/build/Release/iselevated.node:No > such file or directory > pkg-static: Unable to access file > /usr/ports/editors/vscode/work/stage/usr/local/share/code-oss/resources/app/node_modules.asar.unpacked/native-keymap/build/Release/keymapping.node:No > such file or directory > pkg-static: Unable to access file > /usr/ports/editors/vscode/work/stage/usr/local/share/code-oss/resources/app/node_modules.asar.unpacked/native-watchdog/build/Release/watchdog.node:No > such file or directory > pkg-static: Unable to access file > /usr/ports/editors/vscode/work/stage/usr/local/share/code-oss/resources/app/node_modules.asar.unpacked/node-pty/build/Release/pty.node:No > such file or directory > pkg-static: Unable to access file > /usr/ports/editors/vscode/work/stage/usr/local/share/code-oss/resources/app/node_modules.asar.unpacked/spdlog/build/Release/spdlog.node:No > such file or directory > pkg-static: Unable to access file > /usr/ports/editors/vscode/work/stage/usr/local/share/code-oss/resources/app/node_modules.asar.unpacked/vscode-nsfw/build/Release/nsfw.node:No > such file or directory > pkg-static: Unable to access file > /usr/ports/editors/vscode/work/stage/usr/local/share/code-oss/resources/app/node_modules.asar.unpacked/windows-foreground-love/build/Release/foreground_love.node:No > such file or directory > pkg-static: Unable to access file > /usr/ports/editors/vscode/work/stage/usr/local/share/code-oss/resources/app/node_modules.asar.unpacked/windows-foreground-love/build/Release/obj.target/foreground_love.node:No > such file or directory > *** Error code 1 > > Stop. > make: stopped in /usr/ports/editors/vscode From nobody Thu Nov 25 13:56:35 2021 X-Original-To: ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62C7A18A9E68 for ; Thu, 25 Nov 2021 13:56:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4J0KDM6yWvz3CWj for ; Thu, 25 Nov 2021 13:56:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (portscout.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C47B91EB16 for ; Thu, 25 Nov 2021 13:56:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.nyi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.10]) by portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 1APDuZ1G032758 for ; Thu, 25 Nov 2021 13:56:35 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 1APDuZeq032757; Thu, 25 Nov 2021 13:56:35 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <202111251356.1APDuZeq032757@portscout.nyi.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.nyi.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2021 13:56:35 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1637848596; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding; bh=mDZhanhg47OE7wLd70jmijx3+dEuI82IMnvhoa/7i5w=; b=qOSi+3V3d2L8w2njJDAL0jAokkoZLZBJNfHVHuXm9pzu7ooQDzOS4tT10dU5yBnwa4u45y epGHsMaLnKPtizX5lh3nHQFuvWzruagGQ6M0mnKBZhg8LGDoobj3RUV7KcQDQ52y8neRMD fG+QHbQq3vMy7wHfmGmkjAAy+ItaCZ0v1tB9zTLp8WMWrDeUASc++CAe2PGGCwGWMyGpOW ROSTSVor/S+RHz5hY6j86UFk5BbtzsA7jmyBVannHjMtsn4w+zYsGoehBn+Bz7Qq/Erc+i 2rN5mpHd+XX/IaFSDTTSkL+y1Oduw4B9qTQ3bE43zZNCavlEHCxIhGevQQCJhw== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1637848596; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=jTUWAkHUmduhNShtKjGHPLQe61XJpwodoc01ECL+O580Va7SqP2EEvvS0flQvPMiKjsIQJ mhYd8JVtWOma5LIj28agSRvVIAxOr3VFGcLUwl1l5MmoVq2X8wVSLk2w2N1ZZZK35cGemH OubSpa2WXaUfcFPYh+oTWVoXNoGQuriI6tIqKujXkAjtWTjdY5YEvKmgjBN9OPG7nB3eXE uj2NX1sdhIVK7Gz3YS+gdgguBsVmcaWuL4N/Nxmwzdl8F9h+4tBr44QjYA41P7CFvOfFrR FuyjiR6uK6l654FtVuVSWI7uoFanwey3Tnb/3vvsXCCsPJtlFf7V2XLn92duMA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ games/exult | 1.7.0.20211019 | snapshot-v1.7.0.20211125 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Reported by: portscout! From nobody Thu Nov 25 18:45:48 2021 X-Original-To: ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B4B518A5508 for ; Thu, 25 Nov 2021 18:45:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from SRS0=QDRi=QM=klop.ws=ronald-lists@realworks.nl) Received: from smtp-relay-int.realworks.nl (smtp-relay-int.realworks.nl [194.109.157.24]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4J0RfD5fH8z4cxT for ; Thu, 25 Nov 2021 18:45:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from SRS0=QDRi=QM=klop.ws=ronald-lists@realworks.nl) Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2021 19:45:48 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=klop.ws; s=rw2; t=1637865948; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type; bh=Je/MHnDkR3sjO7wPmQSjFo9CY4ZQ/yuTVwpbccfxAm4=; b=slGxPcWvmuf0aqRwNAKSwxXr6QYhAKeubMgsfXjl/aZdvHlh0QA0Qb9IDH+m4OGOJaYz29 9+77dIZO94jU/JccgpFtcv36cdu9M9N9XGzMlLRElDyvooWXAHoIt8knbXwZhO6OJKBmCT Z4mjsi810vM0AMpCSf2amSRulMzzsGoSUzPeAQ539WtlBNuPtUtROunUbZNoNhbo10a9NB 5Y32kc68XhCTRBD7HX0OOXW5ISqT2knCJcmqgl3alBySRnY2VMJzqBqtKVADqA5t5yDj6Q 7o2dnEaAAAV31qR7/4tF4Tu5sXpR/cp03dbdosNRa1wIW78ltmhut62adzWw6A== To: ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <793373037.11342.1637865948585@localhost> Subject: committer for security update Grafana7 List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_11341_1621253415.1637865948583" X-Mailer: Realworks (585.205.5d2ff05) Importance: Normal X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4J0RfD5fH8z4cxT X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=klop.ws header.s=rw2 header.b=slGxPcWv; dmarc=pass (policy=quarantine) header.from=klop.ws; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of "SRS0=QDRi=QM=klop.ws=ronald-lists@realworks.nl" designates 194.109.157.24 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="SRS0=QDRi=QM=klop.ws=ronald-lists@realworks.nl" X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.65 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.45)[-0.451]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[klop.ws:s=rw2]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:194.109.157.0/24]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[klop.ws:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[klop.ws,quarantine]; HAS_X_PRIO_THREE(0.00)[3]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[ronald-lists@klop.ws,SRS0=QDRi=QM=klop.ws=ronald-lists@realworks.nl]; RCVD_COUNT_ZERO(0.00)[0]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[194.109.157.24:from]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:3265, ipnet:194.109.0.0/16, country:NL]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[ronald-lists@klop.ws,SRS0=QDRi=QM=klop.ws=ronald-lists@realworks.nl] Reply-To: ronald-lists@klop.ws From: Ronald Klop via ports X-Original-From: Ronald Klop X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: Y ------=_Part_11341_1621253415.1637865948583 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=259597 This has a maintainer timeout. Anybody willing to take a look? Regards, Ronald ------=_Part_11341_1621253415.1637865948583-- From nobody Thu Nov 25 23:38:40 2021 X-Original-To: ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9636618B5A50; Thu, 25 Nov 2021 23:38:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from koobs.freebsd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pf1-x42c.google.com (mail-pf1-x42c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::42c]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1D4" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4J0Z8C3vqqz3sb9; Thu, 25 Nov 2021 23:38:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from koobs.freebsd@gmail.com) Received: by mail-pf1-x42c.google.com with SMTP id b68so7163491pfg.11; Thu, 25 Nov 2021 15:38:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=sender:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:reply-to:subject :content-language:to:cc:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=bmh6EpEfHK5nj9TC5CKmJF3tudaqu5FKz09QgDq08Mo=; b=E3E0KCmYe2vxGo54v4ldl+uk5fccMBzA8/BNsU7Tv7rWKkUo7nBiKKdooaTD+EFJ6x 0MDqZpBJwgmYpC9vx/rXoSKYN9eRrRFU4g3A0nshvg2aWcb96CXz2ANq85bIN5GXDJTl mpntno5Ni9oPDk4A5UCCh9FtjQwpkE4jEFvtG8v+1pDTbHm4/EOrHfmMde2mZsZ4JKm4 7wiXah9U5hhNNtrBmM0cyfJOknmIC7rNyRzwuGOo315xAuhpgfLEvJFXuuoVOFnAhh+3 v0qRKWBBphBhJOAG4hfF80zDzdQBxjNj8Z5DooK+PYVuAamXTIYVh4oZcghG50qDPfcd LZUg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent :reply-to:subject:content-language:to:cc:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=bmh6EpEfHK5nj9TC5CKmJF3tudaqu5FKz09QgDq08Mo=; b=sTT3+4bqhLmPDsjLWbMi9XBMlTdbC/VvxUtLTw3XuYIWfgTvG1F690GL86sBFUhEU2 ct62/yELiupFgmVWD5g0xRF1Ym8OpEYQ8EO5UerB576YiLy6DWRZfeSwYpIvb5c32+xg kcp4KmxcwcFnGnKRKHqYyF7nARN9V1rFlwaj8RFvNuQ4Ff7k0e9IlsuM7gGiD43TQ/vg hkkZ+DoxFeq1pzsPMIcVioUYbQdJ3NkENgFLVlezBjIY9weafGwlh2SZeTjfyRwgqE3i UMQZpofjEkDu4Te1m5HBehuWGWQoB4/Ot5Qw2VSxo4IgF3zNbjdji+rWU/0JVM4FFksi BGZw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530t4h8tTzEw05MQipAJS0Z9NMNp4gpNQPLuVzRVlXOLYqu7LvjL GU2nqDSjn3yFyfelgqQsVlo= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxgZB0cIF3KFLBESBk09HenXV3+oSfY+hUYitF3uFQjiTzBBQAiNxCXy08ItkG82Rryp3HkQg== X-Received: by 2002:aa7:9586:0:b0:4a2:78b4:a402 with SMTP id z6-20020aa79586000000b004a278b4a402mr17521798pfj.21.1637883524784; Thu, 25 Nov 2021 15:38:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPV6:2403:5807:1b:1:290c:5c9d:ae80:6b2a? (2403-5807-1b-1-290c-5c9d-ae80-6b2a.ip6.aussiebb.net. [2403:5807:1b:1:290c:5c9d:ae80:6b2a]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id nm13sm3678344pjb.56.2021.11.25.15.38.42 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 25 Nov 2021 15:38:44 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2021 10:38:40 +1100 List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:96.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/96.0a1 Reply-To: koobs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Bringing back lang/python27 with few modules? Content-Language: en-US To: Pau Amma Cc: Maxim Sobolev , portmgr@freebsd.org, python@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org References: <56cb1da0-311a-d498-f7a0-db2c0d11dca4@FreeBSD.org> <2adfb8979b5477639f4b4a214ef88a90@gundo.com> From: Kubilay Kocak In-Reply-To: <2adfb8979b5477639f4b4a214ef88a90@gundo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4J0Z8C3vqqz3sb9 X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=E3E0KCmY; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of koobsfreebsd@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::42c as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=koobsfreebsd@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.22 / 15.00]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[koobs@FreeBSD.org]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36:c]; REPLYTO_ADDR_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-0.999]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[koobs@FreeBSD.org,koobsfreebsd@gmail.com]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[koobs@FreeBSD.org,koobsfreebsd@gmail.com]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20210112]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com:dkim]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.99)[-0.988]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[FreeBSD.org]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.97)[0.971]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::42c:from]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N On 22/11/2021 12:57 pm, Pau Amma wrote: > On 2021-11-18 01:37, Kubilay Kocak wrote: >> We've had many user reports over the last year re the entire >> situation, including a number recently about pypy in particular. > > Late to the discussion, but I'm sad that Chromium survived the Python2.7 > removal and Iridium didn't. :-( Please open an issue revive'ing the port, and any others that remain maintained by an upstream From nobody Thu Nov 25 23:39:15 2021 X-Original-To: ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49DCE18B640B for ; Thu, 25 Nov 2021 23:39:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from koobs.freebsd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pj1-x102f.google.com (mail-pj1-x102f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::102f]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1D4" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4J0Z8m4L8Tz3stC; Thu, 25 Nov 2021 23:39:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from koobs.freebsd@gmail.com) Received: by mail-pj1-x102f.google.com with SMTP id cq22-20020a17090af99600b001a9550a17a5so8704797pjb.2; Thu, 25 Nov 2021 15:39:20 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=sender:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:reply-to:subject :content-language:to:cc:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=5Hvv/dHy1EK0K64Q0ibQVRyMSz2Vmbemq3RpR7stues=; b=hn4S2kr4KPxO/Dd5J4ZLrbgLxfcZavYRvoBkCLJZDzemr513xxmIljoM/OyWC0x5bv SFs6+6pGvTkqra2t7mxiYaAT/V2sIg/oP8aNYNGRUZjXWyNPa8qMr7UZr4d8DDl7fs9m PgoxOgKfmOix+OmiHBji/j/hh5l2ILoiMbr91LEm7cbUM+R9/IiLfbj27CKiY5IvgPOz 4YSUnLhhxSNs2xowqRHnMP6vhpPoFx0oSfq9F68/MIq9zf9jkQVRRrPoD2pjWYpGTNdL iKuc0QIlLcA9/19HQtjCRFwHTmMPFvqqycMguRS2X0GBR2FUmR7MYLfaUp/eA/8PIj8d 8S5A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent :reply-to:subject:content-language:to:cc:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=5Hvv/dHy1EK0K64Q0ibQVRyMSz2Vmbemq3RpR7stues=; b=S9FZpO2+E61HWgH1I17qQnRl+y/+t8yIWy8p343Ad2j1HTJ4+C4E/fchRUwV8Eit0G CmhiedHUIPljOA9fzZRxxSlzL8TgTFc9gfkSVNvoLwmGVWOQ+xlRwrv/ooa8h22hFniL h+Y0Y6ELEszFvajIJ+zIkVmjwLREv3FSWkiDV1y+3th11OREoCv8WQMRkD1TYxKuq0OC P/+OhJtClzgm5IZ7AecZKxoevDuCz/EUHUZZ8xEkNJ2duxfkM8FM9UTcWB0ajCPS3snw ea64LpMiNgOwH0SJbnc+XM/WwSC1vIub+eVr3TSJaQMcpNXuDaD+/32E3TsbjJUwDk4F 9O1A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5334veHa3ZjvVZS7tCZULRWhNREx9pqIEQkaVYrVNdzxjF6e2OtG dDSNqmCpCkdX2UmbzmxfMYbebcYM1As= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwD03PAXZBFVy7ZQyA/vMAC6hX5XhgopOqp6MbTuhtX7ebq76Ikd2Y4m+gt6escLuhCx46XOg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:33c8:: with SMTP id lk8mr11272804pjb.97.1637883559440; Thu, 25 Nov 2021 15:39:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPV6:2403:5807:1b:1:290c:5c9d:ae80:6b2a? (2403-5807-1b-1-290c-5c9d-ae80-6b2a.ip6.aussiebb.net. [2403:5807:1b:1:290c:5c9d:ae80:6b2a]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q11sm3424279pgt.54.2021.11.25.15.39.16 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 25 Nov 2021 15:39:19 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <325e53db-a47b-164b-949b-fbedaf10924b@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2021 10:39:15 +1100 List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:96.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/96.0a1 Reply-To: koobs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Bringing back lang/python27 with few modules? Content-Language: en-US To: Rene Ladan , Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> Cc: Pau Amma , Maxim Sobolev , portmgr@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org References: <56cb1da0-311a-d498-f7a0-db2c0d11dca4@FreeBSD.org> <2adfb8979b5477639f4b4a214ef88a90@gundo.com> From: Kubilay Kocak In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4J0Z8m4L8Tz3stC X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=hn4S2kr4; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of koobsfreebsd@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::102f as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=koobsfreebsd@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.21 / 15.00]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[koobs@FreeBSD.org]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36:c]; REPLYTO_ADDR_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[6]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[koobs@FreeBSD.org,koobsfreebsd@gmail.com]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20210112]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[koobs@FreeBSD.org,koobsfreebsd@gmail.com]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com:dkim]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.99)[-0.992]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[FreeBSD.org]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.98)[0.977]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::102f:from]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N On 23/11/2021 7:57 pm, Rene Ladan wrote: > On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 07:46:35PM +0100, Miroslav Lachman wrote: >> On 22/11/2021 10:46, Rene Ladan wrote: >>> On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 01:57:56AM +0000, Pau Amma wrote: >>>> On 2021-11-18 01:37, Kubilay Kocak wrote: >>>>> We've had many user reports over the last year re the entire >>>>> situation, including a number recently about pypy in particular. >>>> >>>> Late to the discussion, but I'm sad that Chromium survived the Python2.7 >>>> removal and Iridium didn't. :-( >>> >>> Upstream Iridium always seems to lag behind Chromium for a bit, but it is >>> doing OK now I geuss (one major version behind). The problem with Iridium >>> is also volunteer time to keep the port up to date, one Chromium-like port >>> is already a lot. >> >> Even if you are OK with Chromium, there are users for which Chromium is >> not an option and Iridium is more than just preferable. (or Ungoogled, >> or Brave or something else not so heavily tied to Google spying / tracking) >> >> Removing Iridium was a really bad step. >> > To all of those that keep complaining that Iridium got removed: > feel free to bring it back and maintain it. > > Regards, > René > Not helpful Rene. Thank you. From nobody Fri Nov 26 00:10:21 2021 X-Original-To: ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81B8518C57E1 for ; Fri, 26 Nov 2021 00:10:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ygy@freebsd.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [96.47.72.83]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4J0Zrn1z4Cz4bDV; Fri, 26 Nov 2021 00:10:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ygy@freebsd.org) Received: from mail-wm1-f43.google.com (mail-wm1-f43.google.com [209.85.128.43]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1D4" (verified OK)) (Authenticated sender: ygy) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1A635F6F8; Fri, 26 Nov 2021 00:10:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ygy@freebsd.org) Received: by mail-wm1-f43.google.com with SMTP id 77-20020a1c0450000000b0033123de3425so9534477wme.0; Thu, 25 Nov 2021 16:10:33 -0800 (PST) X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532IRt0x3TREVZaNOqWjMwHPhG0mYW4Cm4HTRZY6iQ5HdAlpw17I RnxlXL8sb6mPOEkeWuFPkhpHBd4TRjpNvpDfmpc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyK6d8WfGrItr85kRbARLDEv2Rqpv8xrsryNrqxRfINbq2h5OeBAzRxU884g3f96scD39m+qDJkhmdkyUdCnj0= X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:4793:: with SMTP id k19mr12452939wmo.72.1637885431938; Thu, 25 Nov 2021 16:10:31 -0800 (PST) List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <56cb1da0-311a-d498-f7a0-db2c0d11dca4@FreeBSD.org> <2adfb8979b5477639f4b4a214ef88a90@gundo.com> <325e53db-a47b-164b-949b-fbedaf10924b@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <325e53db-a47b-164b-949b-fbedaf10924b@FreeBSD.org> From: Guangyuan Yang Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2021 19:10:21 -0500 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: Bringing back lang/python27 with few modules? To: Kubilay Kocak Cc: Rene Ladan , Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz>, Pau Amma , Maxim Sobolev , portmgr@freebsd.org, "ports@FreeBSD.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1637885433; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=z85En1/QM0XSIAXqAkpxF9JgpNUoHldtNjncwgRh0RY=; b=IpBCaNLP0k/yQJSAIfq6ja4QJ9YzvNsxr5ei3u7I9bAdp+LRGXkQz0cED6ZQHrHBi+Irma z7N7POy7OgotR+h2AENrMWQ83zALiIQZtNN0q33TMQlIe0tXM+7qkqNMXCm6icAoM+7uad DyIKdL+ELk3B384zWVjLayXmWybjUAYgMwIJAWm3Hno9eFMI9ak1seKCBWKAiS1f7ZUVgv eUMqFu8J5qQ1Yk7FrSIxwTYaB7oMZKpj2UoSN+24jJClj6UdpK8SbnoduTnZCN4jnZ8QpE /soVTU0AVaXjJmZnLSikMGvJEyl4WSRD0CY+IaHw5uAdVskqxgS7JIy/IjeATA== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1637885433; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=YklvBjhgsY6+s3QWjY7v8jz8sk5cdYRmSkJTtYuJc9G3u/ZVJoz5X7eaJrRTRTWWRq5u+U dgoQLas8qF4h7fXhbR+QGBvX1WiDM7Rd0sQwxrEdpbBrOW/nH9Qic7w5Ir1Ez+mJK0Ch5Z HANDxc44ct8Kh+xT0f0SJzDHhv0nyAV46vfY63YOSSsQyX9V2CTbm60YT7E5yO1A8lV0AH dR4jhiC6xba9ZSiv7VPQC016CU4fTenGnFRPKETnhwSjqUYmFrFjnoxcU2Mr00tM8BsK2z VZzUCotcmipPhGb+79mz0R8Zbaq2ksPoXZtv7Yak26wE05yN8JvrIVgg926AOw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N Kubilay Kocak =E4=BA=8E2021=E5=B9=B411=E6=9C=8825=E6=97= =A5=E5=91=A8=E5=9B=9B =E4=B8=8B=E5=8D=886:40=E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A > > On 23/11/2021 7:57 pm, Rene Ladan wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 07:46:35PM +0100, Miroslav Lachman wrote: > >> On 22/11/2021 10:46, Rene Ladan wrote: > >>> On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 01:57:56AM +0000, Pau Amma wrote: > >>>> On 2021-11-18 01:37, Kubilay Kocak wrote: > >>>>> We've had many user reports over the last year re the entire > >>>>> situation, including a number recently about pypy in particular. > >>>> > >>>> Late to the discussion, but I'm sad that Chromium survived the Pytho= n2.7 > >>>> removal and Iridium didn't. :-( > >>> > >>> Upstream Iridium always seems to lag behind Chromium for a bit, but i= t is > >>> doing OK now I geuss (one major version behind). The problem with Iri= dium > >>> is also volunteer time to keep the port up to date, one Chromium-like= port > >>> is already a lot. > >> > >> Even if you are OK with Chromium, there are users for which Chromium i= s > >> not an option and Iridium is more than just preferable. (or Ungoogled, > >> or Brave or something else not so heavily tied to Google spying / trac= king) > >> > >> Removing Iridium was a really bad step. > >> > > To all of those that keep complaining that Iridium got removed: > > feel free to bring it back and maintain it. > > > > Regards, > > Ren=C3=A9 > > > > Not helpful Rene. Thank you. > The nice thing about a version control system is that we can revert and adjust things. So I believe that interested people should not be discouraged to work on the revival of that port, and I see no problem in this particular advice that "we will discuss it after someone steps up to maintain it" as a next step. Best, --=20 Guangyuan Yang ygy@FreeBSD.org From nobody Fri Nov 26 02:11:37 2021 X-Original-To: ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19A9718AEB2E; Fri, 26 Nov 2021 02:11:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pauamma@gundo.com) Received: from mail.gundo.com (gibson.gundo.com [75.145.166.65]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4J0dXY06qJz3h0l; Fri, 26 Nov 2021 02:11:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pauamma@gundo.com) Received: from webmail.gundo.com (variax.gundo.com [75.145.166.70]) by mail.gundo.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F33D4C5002; Thu, 25 Nov 2021 20:11:40 -0600 (CST) List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2021 02:11:37 +0000 From: Pau Amma To: koobs@freebsd.org Cc: Maxim Sobolev , portmgr@freebsd.org, python@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Bringing back lang/python27 with few modules? In-Reply-To: References: <56cb1da0-311a-d498-f7a0-db2c0d11dca4@FreeBSD.org> <2adfb8979b5477639f4b4a214ef88a90@gundo.com> User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.4.8 Message-ID: <84ea90f6ecd16feb9821ce4b967c7d81@gundo.com> X-Sender: pauamma@gundo.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4J0dXY06qJz3h0l X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-Spam: Yes X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N On 2021-11-25 23:38, Kubilay Kocak wrote: > On 22/11/2021 12:57 pm, Pau Amma wrote: >> On 2021-11-18 01:37, Kubilay Kocak wrote: >>> We've had many user reports over the last year re the entire >>> situation, including a number recently about pypy in particular. >> >> Late to the discussion, but I'm sad that Chromium survived the >> Python2.7 removal and Iridium didn't. :-( > > Please open an issue revive'ing the port, and any others that remain > maintained by an upstream https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=260052 for Iridium. I'll let others submit revival requests for any they're interested or invested in using. From nobody Fri Nov 26 12:03:33 2021 X-Original-To: ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D8AC18AFAA4 for ; Fri, 26 Nov 2021 12:03:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rene@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:6074::16:84]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4J0tgV0KzTz4stP; Fri, 26 Nov 2021 12:03:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rene@freebsd.org) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1637928214; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=ohuDJwPisth710wgNOtOEMyIFnWJXACpoNZKMjGs2O0=; b=kW4WvJRNZQNnonh8bWDh9fOAsz51+AB4xaXTA6YgQt1/4iUBar8gtARrk9+h6JHvo90OZ+ n/j2IB9iJzuejAe7jCaeJHLhG45eLYLbEIDt3pjJiiFBnyUCPkb+KiV4GR1B0dXEwwilxW reFsZXnxfnLamtnHDwgllxsz+xr5EUMjv0hVplAsbggQVKu7G+1F1TROcQ+bp/YhVyiiNL hULB+o0ZwTynqdWQSFouRTRVHaBg3VtDTM6/B1bd9RiW+K7mOBQgBSA9FYIeR4SE4qVnCu CExF/cvTGloAIz6KiQcAyMG/o0KsyXA5LUnkyqLgH4MEcmv2tKTmOzV92s8MPA== Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1185) id E7E8110BD7; Fri, 26 Nov 2021 12:03:33 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2021 12:03:33 +0000 From: Rene Ladan To: Kubilay Kocak Cc: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz>, Pau Amma , Maxim Sobolev , portmgr@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Bringing back lang/python27 with few modules? Message-ID: References: <56cb1da0-311a-d498-f7a0-db2c0d11dca4@FreeBSD.org> <2adfb8979b5477639f4b4a214ef88a90@gundo.com> <325e53db-a47b-164b-949b-fbedaf10924b@FreeBSD.org> List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <325e53db-a47b-164b-949b-fbedaf10924b@FreeBSD.org> ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1637928214; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=ohuDJwPisth710wgNOtOEMyIFnWJXACpoNZKMjGs2O0=; b=X4KOTELxQJqjxSWy+UcbI4gONnQGEmsN6I+/kJBM7hN9jUQ0AHcNrmEgzpcHgUR36phF5M asW186FawtZDQA7yhq4ULF0iQlRZQeDDZfIMVQAw6sGRoyBXxVFNSrQn4iLsD2Q2b4cS8T VdE4qWrNRg+tW//5v88LYbvrevy3HVW1f16rKmw25ayWMwJzAABDrOO6iL4us3FG262tju /EoxkzCvAFcqM6iU3vnTwOhC0dbUCyS9U1hUQoZ5gMiv5rHQGg6BC8bKYdmLQpigOIOJJ/ PJp25e4lf7nTiwBVJy8v6RSz4vpamZ6hpO9kLI9KyK5UQbs/NAAPMOpwVuTW1A== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1637928214; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=XJLjjtSamGCwo4OqpipLmWU42cHHfVdRUwtXC3qm0yIell+UoMJMUexQS2OvDPP1khRs88 9mah4Reson7CRuASGPNkuvvLlVOZsHE8EMJiy3eUI1JYSLAZLjxAJJexex5cdd8YEjh2xI ohHhdmrYEZInu7ycBiBwRmgn3rQAUfMO7kdA79W7hye1fertAqrVK3YjCJESy0D3ienle5 T8hsXOwY5jqaLU7NVUXLEwSlVi8bv2vbl7Zcmv6K4CQ3qS1/CECfCA1SYO40C9obSEaIOa lJmUoNI84UINr7/c2Q/Ri6hFsvdzdFXTf+UxUD+z8z2kkOFnQPwC52mYyJxRrA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N On Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 10:39:15AM +1100, Kubilay Kocak wrote: > On 23/11/2021 7:57 pm, Rene Ladan wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 07:46:35PM +0100, Miroslav Lachman wrote: > >> On 22/11/2021 10:46, Rene Ladan wrote: > >>> On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 01:57:56AM +0000, Pau Amma wrote: > >>>> On 2021-11-18 01:37, Kubilay Kocak wrote: > >>>>> We've had many user reports over the last year re the entire > >>>>> situation, including a number recently about pypy in particular. > >>>> > >>>> Late to the discussion, but I'm sad that Chromium survived the Python2.7 > >>>> removal and Iridium didn't. :-( > >>> > >>> Upstream Iridium always seems to lag behind Chromium for a bit, but it is > >>> doing OK now I geuss (one major version behind). The problem with Iridium > >>> is also volunteer time to keep the port up to date, one Chromium-like port > >>> is already a lot. > >> > >> Even if you are OK with Chromium, there are users for which Chromium is > >> not an option and Iridium is more than just preferable. (or Ungoogled, > >> or Brave or something else not so heavily tied to Google spying / tracking) > >> > >> Removing Iridium was a really bad step. > >> > > To all of those that keep complaining that Iridium got removed: > > feel free to bring it back and maintain it. > > > > Regards, > > René > > > > Not helpful Rene. Thank you. Neither is your reply. René From nobody Sat Nov 27 11:22:06 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C6FD18BCF1F for ; Sat, 27 Nov 2021 11:22:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marklmi@yahoo.com) Received: from sonic310-20.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (sonic310-20.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com [98.137.69.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4J1TjQ2BnYz4TDc for ; Sat, 27 Nov 2021 11:22:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marklmi@yahoo.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1638012131; bh=tqMz9VBpf58PQWhMRbpLgzozhJ6hJXnqNVRxnK4j/Js=; h=From:Subject:Date:To:References:From:Subject:Reply-To; b=rqm2SR7ydEIf2RcwDxSX5OcRIHJSVivkRqCJJ7n34blOo+KMIYtjld/ifudHJSgb0UEvRwElpfiYd5hI45etMzJWEotFVum5d6g/r+1kpFyYVVVjtLf8DaAD5cgksSDRlUdvbOD+FdmLq+ZO2ZUsT0CzPK/yq2A/65eYQE7Jfs4pYPnPb8mEEWmXFq7tlBVZU1esE4aLWBuEfLDiVNq7pZ6OPaVfLFVjgzfIetzCpRTDGIPndpFy6xop0rpKfX9J2NKIYNpIEBIipqRZqN7HXt8qNfaf199CcLJS1QDfowIPU/9lHEdZWtZ13dCQsXQ3BL3H8TT1xbx9vBTm7F7MsA== X-SONIC-DKIM-SIGN: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1638012131; bh=QW+5BfqTVoJJCxI0UL59wrl/ybHPFPn1Xg8aGBMB09C=; h=X-Sonic-MF:From:Subject:Date:To:From:Subject; b=BQFpqGMWZugDiLZ1w5f65EoZMbFk/Q1BFTfKh2q0tk2kLd7WgPaq7zc+43kop1zJjli/TJlPfnzeoxuaz+7DhK2KHMXbdeREZa7801KDggo1UD8LuJz5pPN+IGPw5TGGg6sCZ0th5wrxnVxIrm87VEpXfeOFxrGESlv9gUoRvBEgci8PfiCLUI99JGrUOW9W2+YyCFYos4ZfYIZxzLQceYphlbAwer7fFtfWdSLZqYNv0caKiwHSb+oJz0yvm4Ep6cda08geWXfWCJDQq+9w4e9kVQII1x9c4hkRUn0vKH2m0RcE7gs0HA7L6SBOEpTE2i+AC0I/HpWT2l74CRlLOg== X-YMail-OSG: f7DszVwVM1lrKTi0liHzoHvTcayY5D26n.3VNSF4mYOsDeHuMjU.NCkkP2by0AN c_EslKbDzYFdh7vkFMXcnw5EZQUE92MNYCydeS9X11LQl27V0UeiG7VJS11ZpXNNLknvaqMqknIa hejB8vu0jls1MB9nHQpYpHRCmlHyX5AQUlokFcn_m4A0lIKyzkYGzogBY4ivZoC_WpldgxGHsI9k hfdgwBif8ytrFaNunE5Y3gmfpnDn5.Dt_9GHbFASfZSkWPzghsUYzANRVk.DoygtuneQPVDjXHld V94lUy4bK0p_3xbhAOnUk6LyOuXBUc9G2mrgj3qPZpR.wg8tNxidtxs4K5B2TfeIx4o4t7vuaJ.6 357r5ksF_WpCrBD1rPowY2A.ehA10VHekQsplD5mDi8UlYJaYjYq7kdoVS7F7lpWopoliB_JFmh8 69N31Wf8E9lq.psbmRYnH2xxrf5tDh4DY_ESGorYITpTeUEjDg5vVuOMQphx6Jm5gH7VL6Gl77DQ 3yYjJCr099D5HaPgdIVAVHYtdUGXm1PB6kiNOweveo47sL7wfsE3I974EC.gEIt8v91Im70w1lTI EnHw1XwwyprMyj_ZxVt3IjzXxX4RV5Ee3QVuQ467ygF_8kEfgNViVQ9vM7ZYYyBKRCVvhVMjabd1 _9uh.FZ4wgCl_HUDkF3_eBOBPFFpF0utDS._FAuIpPg48z_J64piII5ppAZ6HNOuDaPANNIviXuk 3XFUPTgtEbWImyJNpgL5iubWbWYberJiu0MfjdRMJQ89qhuTOE1LMtYWC8IPhc8RzVvUtmNZbfOc x3qEoNvod0WuUo7UK57xz8KYS6p8gLHIydIhdwlZteWM7KhW12OETYGlFSEYDi1Zz3nUsq67ngLn y0eV7fekLzVpS49cSOOlSG.X2DZFBBUOzg8ItxoGy752yK5v.OZzDNRjcGDbYlclUuIam01yXde. VzqOArlQ51JZ.kkaY3igrzuqGjOT.H4uTiwqhYhsQnY0ZbWbEa5iWxgkJ1nwCoGLHMkMtVnpq7Eu .rYr.O_c9ZRPf_HvbFNgUTrgq06CJ2KmzPk0ZFYLt9Y8psxyA9vYonXBVANVAKsmdQuGdRLfW4e4 HUcr6tVPfQQ95UgkRLG0cA128LyVT5LRS2qxsAaEFk1zeKju6fGwb5W8tgs.wkJX9GgwdSApue4b az5eaF83GKVqATnfIIPdIM3WXftk0alu46zgD9nearPLHxG0DyqlxIhGKd7aPCp78PeMMWMPEjO1 53d2Y.leeonsXb.eqanxdUyEtF7vf3_BRKJlkW5Q86NUZjkdDjTN0E1BUmhekq.jJg1e3dntl5eY JdAu8Je3uJcgGfSJ23dhH2djA6XKJHeM6VlZjNDsNlwileeOhqY4Gvau9GM_pkQiTEywJlLY6gKa 76yt7bx5G3c7PJu1_4i5KdRPI0RDWU_KHblwH4X3D1_NvFHinuLvzi3WAk7JtZqxPAUybviigUQ5 9TYTXIOiN5r6wOiUemXb.MyJv7qL6dtXCFyiSefquNZgHlk1Dk4TZ9gLBaHhj7Ki_pL86QUSGY6S OTtRsWz3wpD78Ve3pf.1yBUPH2kStDslJMGyPwh2Oset_cJoQT3QY0Aoz2Jo6KPKfOw4Ny7TUnWI rE6pQCZvKFNXFvP9D9l8tLzfVeKTBbbvaVerurIwbqbOlPhmcIAzlHchtv.nWVtU2Vb3C4TtR2eH .GtkDQTnsPWTHvhH.ruevq4YSa40uZnfMUCGUVpJ4xh2mpFYs3GwhuqYMmlfxV4CcxyFXXrR2ZeE ujBnMWpri1n_YIlKvOA5mo8BELanacrFv7m1lfmdCY9excevXpQFx2R00P6PpeLk4_lVeFmr6a1m KZ_u8oU0ycIJHpsghUmqVBUChXWkUiwpBeoiuaPSB6v37VpsIzNi4wJ84aK9n4XGxZU.v9RnC.jI 3wwuRecmqcPdTkVZV9ZFporBHEDgbBQoc0BScgMNE4q6ebqbxRqxbbOjECFLad5efUxdduLsEb5g mNJRVF5nZ8SVendNPVWWwhkA0sCJABlqVe2GhRFjqD6WmSyJoz7R57U4kY7XRj.uJEIiXZ9dNG.D tJ2GyftxGu46kAuogVWgP8UXq138X381nOfDWv.UZGMsbPpbNixbyt2ffWDRJH_UEht8mI0wOMtJ JdXx4SPTncUnhpJ2lWc.B_DGhXiJekeEnOZzOGmub_PPqaji3LUsJWqjKNhbUMxmgqHfjzAycYPS XB_BWQUyll6H_8jpSCcOuXKYbw8mjQdoj5O1CDKdlIdOr7KRm_erkYbXkmfTKnqXj6DaOxZv2L_g NBm31hFQ- X-Sonic-MF: Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic310.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with HTTP; Sat, 27 Nov 2021 11:22:11 +0000 Received: by kubenode530.mail-prod1.omega.ne1.yahoo.com (VZM Hermes SMTP Server) with ESMTPA ID 1b778d479674f29d492e03f3e3b102ff; Sat, 27 Nov 2021 11:22:07 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.120.0.1.13\)) Subject: amd64 main [so: 14]: recent bulk builds are reporting: pid ??? comm conftest has trashed its stack, killing Message-Id: <6393FE15-8839-42D2-B012-6EA2AF671F9C@yahoo.com> Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2021 03:22:06 -0800 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.120.0.1.13) References: <6393FE15-8839-42D2-B012-6EA2AF671F9C.ref@yahoo.com> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4J1TjQ2BnYz4TDc X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=yahoo.com header.s=s2048 header.b=rqm2SR7y; dmarc=pass (policy=reject) header.from=yahoo.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of marklmi@yahoo.com designates 98.137.69.146 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=marklmi@yahoo.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.35 / 15.00]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[yahoo.com]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ptr:yahoo.com]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[yahoo.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[yahoo.com,reject]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[yahoo.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:36647, ipnet:98.137.64.0/20, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; SUBJECT_HAS_QUESTION(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[yahoo.com:s=s2048]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[yahoo.com:dkim]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(1.00)[1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.15)[0.150]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[98.137.69.146:from]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[98.137.69.146:from]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] Reply-To: marklmi@yahoo.com From: Mark Millard via freebsd-ports X-Original-From: Mark Millard X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N I do not remember the output from poudriere builds having reports like the following before: pid 35298 comm conftest has trashed its stack, killing . . . pid 36773 comm conftest has trashed its stack, killing (There are 16 builders active in the bulk run. The output does not make it clear which builder(s) generated the messages.) # uname -apKU FreeBSD amd64_ZFS 14.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 14.0-CURRENT #14 = main-n250972-319e9fc642a1-dirty: Tue Nov 23 11:43:26 PST 2021 = root@amd64_ZFS:/usr/obj/BUILDs/main-amd64-nodbg-clang/usr/main-src/amd64.a= md64/sys/GENERIC-NODBG amd64 amd64 1400042 1400042 =3D=3D=3D Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away in early 2018-Mar) From nobody Sat Nov 27 14:04:48 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2495018C0E1B for ; Sat, 27 Nov 2021 14:05:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marklmi@yahoo.com) Received: from sonic301-21.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (sonic301-21.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com [98.137.64.147]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4J1YK74H85z3mwc for ; Sat, 27 Nov 2021 14:04:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marklmi@yahoo.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1638021892; bh=hePBZkUIVtHuebHnGseUfMXTRiNX8CSzunVjTIl7f7o=; h=From:Subject:Date:To:References:From:Subject:Reply-To; b=IMqq5LPwsHF+tBE+m8eA45oeaUHcaGAnmiAv9oYsDASvoOyV7VOePwXNOXiO+pBHRU7OGXXlfV7hcoeGUyzLUV/UTOwaqAzMYBJoO7fr36f+RVWMJlc33yfXzS3qtEkEYzCmM9nvLqql9KabpzSJhuGdRvesb3Am/ejmvqTHg/94BGlwbIspo/PMCPhcTetHqHGNKeXTo0ArjHvp73pZ9QfKjIUUyrcPa/nhVW1crlrb0RhZ7pTSAO4PdZXWoPiHB/Kqsc3OxEwthN2daIMObiDxRMo7evo23/Wuh39zkmnXVDcTbIpCHZPPprjC+gRRQU0d9ebtXCxy3i7u0R6cIQ== X-SONIC-DKIM-SIGN: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1638021892; bh=X4aQX7WeDfmGCl5aN7sKtJN8QOBwcCJJQEI6cGpKRhs=; h=X-Sonic-MF:From:Subject:Date:To:From:Subject; b=EvUHFI+V0LZN70gydf4eowfUj3z2B5aHV/HQjREDQkyLEeuC2DdoJmxRPt9YKVDYSBlemNap7gUDSt1VSdEQk3p7spWKQhLnpWi96EzqenFqOfQUCwuC+JqEQaLV1bEv3tGfY3mBKViPi9gSa1RP11TIX1g9K6q6jiLNiNrr7ym+msWMJY77dmOm5UKE6COIUScZo16pOktydhKfWpALIUYUCSJrsUA4UigHrKaiQJkjUgpHFh+plaE6vX6WZGJ1B0NMYmmga+fWBazdE0p/rglArLdstrSxGX+0DFLOy18018PtFc5V32NLuUvVu1BK/oKD12KOK/CNh/SkgNy0FA== X-YMail-OSG: KJZQ4f4VM1kjQ1BlLaMdczqFy9c43ZoYRhp0xdTb5SCAXoKisuaiE.synQYqOX2 KtAoVolMsF4ir5og.E5dJyjJY1sHU1AdU.xIXTm67gLHXnasrR2ZLOqMxb0n70AbuLLdbVNIIXOw eh3iYE07VCn_fe6zK1sGaMiyivOTrwypUg1x7XdQQbbvuz5LXilZecLlIBqy_m8sBvduMYjkHH9U Vj3tuQYXeqETFaby0MyFRIN6rcOJD..vOOoyXJXhLh5Mrvg.z4kETDWHCCP_x6B2Tlpr8oKnsrXC RXMLwC8o1WuY6Swtt2VpP1iNbU6n7V4Vh8jkGXTqlMOPijQUCxWo3Ez_fEQZH70gThu.rLrOnUs8 sSzqaVSwhDPySIEVkcqdXEqYQTK_2hi9ayxqpOBH9PamhPhJhIoA8n5Y.okDZqO.x00NRTBpUlOX _GzurKZ4bMazZ4Yt.1Ptu4xD9TOIqZmQdfultxIIvCbzyxqENSjzSZGDKCtWh20cuq4F1jD0tu8z qPlXAKKkIVMtFl4OU1PZM6a25QsRP59vpdZj00iyfv_17Annv1rC6_3.OQkLxVdaYWlV1xstyTE8 v3QNtyzPV0IfkjCQtJO9fMODbBIqWyTghr67wjfsG4VLFKp5mGyRwfbpphKJeFzlbL58ztm69HFU vlXhXLpZJV9Hqrp3izBS4Tcjv80qGrChHO9No.PTy13j6pGp0.t5BGlZ_j7CL30rddkjerEtsiNV YDhtLFPIscX_eR1yI_M5XI6LA75vVPZGYGhqK95XlTKwNCQ_ldZlU6.azvz2nIVJDSo.Ki7hI3qR lx3eO0PgLXtPq3If8opHo_UMInpGb96uDvBJcs4qRqyo9i565PjK7v.vm6cVm9knyMCUB20EjwLV cyWfOLYMDc.Nb9QdL02uUJzvFnBlN9DrqGPVRr11LyIS2buusc3ciPvOXWu54zvtr_EXCH1hRLTJ eaLnj.wvZ03.SslpWYS3aa5EZ5nYnwMeyaTHCSFGyteYtMMF6sjOrLQItQ6v184J.fAFg6JRUiOE lH1.ssAjLppIo.l9aqi52.Du31OU0h0gZFe_8JppvIHeAkKxDTLMbMhlnlX0_LnlwxW9do8aCIHu HSNMDvTOI1iFMNALxhAz0YwOt5x.TEanoq4SrTP4LHFlqbimeQE5WZHE7TaMwLRnhHc43XyGpL2p kGoOE0zo5IPSZYN0NoTI2THjLXcKeZzhc1WiTy3jijyAvhUv1S73.fJO1sT3DZLF9rR9wQ7VttpF SyRw8W_b7VC_SZ9khu_4m3Uz_bSTUSL8NYM7GbFS2hcALLrOUhXKwTDCEh.wSETxkx1clUfIvP3g 1stasQskQcD3BRlf_GebDWw9ib5FdIVicf_uQVoJ_T0wrpMnwrFRX5ZvqenhQX5WcNqJC0TPiyhK iFu5dp6DccXeygyI2PUNmIAcCPugqNCIB.OpFm5kQF5OnN9C8xdcaKYU4pgCEqSga4CIdh92DeQb JqQ.R3B67kbdHcwp821EF6YsoY2sO2G75JnjnEMJzDva0cbVA4LsA0Z.NfmHCgyjehwxz5ERTjKh _LAtmwbOoPvYQR9MZ5epkciFGZ7I4BpYV425274tvpgMRML9XBFfxng4lvw.4JPbc2MtyyUsxs9h PpuSt7yjsu9fH6434.IN7X5Re2iic7sLOachLq2dgjqDJtzERC5XBIDnZPbNhJ.bZlVxqL1zdhFd hNO7h3dE8AOiER0zVGGUJB3FmLJYmIRuOZhamNl2A4gwH0j0GhU2mA.LbIskEgTitj80JK6gtTCO 6HbWp71ab2keAmHR34XBs88CM8OUX99KuUxN4DMgI4ysnPW8AfM4pJZBB3K7JDeUSHhHjMuqHmqV N98sg5S3julYrW.Dzu2TrwnyFFCXhtyITMT2mjXFZ0NnQly4QxFLQSM4LgykRD4P4ggper9s2y9K ft3TvLo34hS0UNL57ZgUZyUE.U8u7vSa9Kvd_Nfc.KPQC.tCSB49wM__5CXz50zsdjckoCs5FEUf J2A74fl05RHctD2ltLWBCYdQ8QsC4Srkh66QSDTipajlW8g.jf5.N93NdrkTrmqVYbadtGSY4Xkl rQ7mafoLEFAN5daG0G6YhqHaD11SpA4HTon62hmT25vXDDMJqu4Q6agTmWssoI_CygWIXs70.lcy WdhVe6gvo2KefHQSU7tjuCMBoMhfMf2yAPIhKIAhew_c3eV0VHzNwmeJGHlLBpU9sWJ90Vwoubt8 a1csDsAic_4NkbPfjnqPkUCqWm7y9Q6tWwklGaI6pGwhpFhGV4PebBQiRIYcDUonpb6aS0T_SOs5 pEGREnITnGs6NOV.4o33slg-- X-Sonic-MF: Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic301.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with HTTP; Sat, 27 Nov 2021 14:04:52 +0000 Received: by kubenode524.mail-prod1.omega.gq1.yahoo.com (VZM Hermes SMTP Server) with ESMTPA ID 38c267f17ec5e24b63104d685d1b0505; Sat, 27 Nov 2021 14:04:49 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.120.0.1.13\)) Subject: armv7 main [so: 14] targeting via poudriere bulk builds: iperf3 fails to build: iperf_api.c:4460:5: error: unknown type name 'cpu_set_t'; did you mean 'cpuset_t'? Message-Id: <2E8E8E81-A29F-47AB-A14D-8B60811FE7EE@yahoo.com> Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2021 06:04:48 -0800 To: "bmah@freebsd.org" , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.120.0.1.13) References: <2E8E8E81-A29F-47AB-A14D-8B60811FE7EE.ref@yahoo.com> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4J1YK74H85z3mwc X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=yahoo.com header.s=s2048 header.b=IMqq5LPw; dmarc=pass (policy=reject) header.from=yahoo.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of marklmi@yahoo.com designates 98.137.64.147 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=marklmi@yahoo.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.40 / 15.00]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_SOME(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[yahoo.com]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ptr:yahoo.com]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[yahoo.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[yahoo.com,reject]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[yahoo.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:36647, ipnet:98.137.64.0/20, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[yahoo.com:dkim]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.90)[-0.900]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[yahoo.com:s=s2048]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-0.998]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[98.137.64.147:from]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[98.137.64.147:from]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] Reply-To: marklmi@yahoo.com From: Mark Millard via freebsd-ports X-Original-From: Mark Millard X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N Notably amd64 targeting did not have this problem. I've not tried aarch64 targeting yet. Still, it looks like iperf3 needs the #define _WITH_CPU_SET_T opt-in someplace: --- iperf_api.lo --- iperf_api.c:4460:5: error: unknown type name 'cpu_set_t'; did you mean = 'cpuset_t'? cpu_set_t cpu_set; ^~~~~~~~~ cpuset_t /usr/include/sys/_cpuset.h:50:24: note: 'cpuset_t' declared here typedef struct _cpuset cpuset_t; ^ iperf_api.c:4464:9: warning: implicit declaration of function = 'sched_setaffinity' is invalid in C99 [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] if (sched_setaffinity(0, sizeof(cpu_set_t), &cpu_set) !=3D 0) { ^ iperf_api.c:4464:37: error: use of undeclared identifier 'cpu_set_t'; = did you mean 'cpuset'? if (sched_setaffinity(0, sizeof(cpu_set_t), &cpu_set) !=3D 0) { ^~~~~~~~~ cpuset /usr/include/sys/cpuset.h:156:5: note: 'cpuset' declared here int cpuset(cpusetid_t *); ^ iperf_api.c:4506:5: error: unknown type name 'cpu_set_t'; did you mean = 'cpuset_t'? cpu_set_t cpu_set; ^~~~~~~~~ cpuset_t /usr/include/sys/_cpuset.h:50:24: note: 'cpuset_t' declared here typedef struct _cpuset cpuset_t; ^ iperf_api.c:4512:9: warning: implicit declaration of function = 'sched_setaffinity' is invalid in C99 [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] if (sched_setaffinity(0, sizeof(cpu_set_t), &cpu_set) !=3D 0) { ^ iperf_api.c:4512:37: error: use of undeclared identifier 'cpu_set_t'; = did you mean 'cpuset'? if (sched_setaffinity(0, sizeof(cpu_set_t), &cpu_set) !=3D 0) { ^~~~~~~~~ cpuset /usr/include/sys/cpuset.h:156:5: note: 'cpuset' declared here int cpuset(cpusetid_t *); ^ 2 warnings and 4 errors generated. *** [iperf_api.lo] Error code 1 make[3]: stopped in = /wrkdirs/usr/ports/benchmarks/iperf3/work/iperf-3.10.1/src For reference: # uname -apKU FreeBSD CA72_16Gp_ZFS 14.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 14.0-CURRENT #22 = main-n250972-319e9fc642a1-dirty: Tue Nov 23 12:25:36 PST 2021 = root@CA72_16Gp_ZFS:/usr/obj/BUILDs/main-CA72-nodbg-clang/usr/main-src/arm6= 4.aarch64/sys/GENERIC-NODBG-CA72 arm64 aarch64 1400042 1400042 # poudriere jail -jmain-CA7 -i Jail name: main-CA7 Jail version: 14.0-CURRENT Jail arch: arm.armv7 Jail method: null Jail mount: /usr/obj/DESTDIRs/main-CA7-poud Jail fs: =20 Jail updated: 2021-06-27 17:58:33 Jail pkgbase: disabled # uname -apKU FreeBSD CA72_16Gp_ZFS 14.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 14.0-CURRENT #22 = main-n250972-319e9fc642a1-dirty: Tue Nov 23 12:25:36 PST 2021 = root@CA72_16Gp_ZFS:/usr/obj/BUILDs/main-CA72-nodbg-clang/usr/main-src/arm6= 4.aarch64/sys/GENERIC-NODBG-CA72 arm armv7 1400042 1400042 =3D=3D=3D Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away in early 2018-Mar) From nobody Sat Nov 27 20:03:19 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06F0018BA93A for ; Sat, 27 Nov 2021 20:03:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pvoigt@uos.de) Received: from vm411.rz.uni-osnabrueck.de (smtp-auth-1.serv.uni-osnabrueck.de [131.173.16.143]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4J1jGy3nBKz3KZH for ; Sat, 27 Nov 2021 20:03:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pvoigt@uos.de) Received: from spock.drpetervoigt.eu (spock.drpetervoigt.eu [217.91.107.36]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: pvoigt) by vm411.rz.uni-osnabrueck.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6DE7330363C4 for ; Sat, 27 Nov 2021 21:03:21 +0100 (CET) Received: from kirk.drpetervoigt.private (kirk.drpetervoigt.private [192.168.1.60]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: pvoigt) by spock.drpetervoigt.eu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D20CB1AAB7D for ; Sat, 27 Nov 2021 21:03:19 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4aabecf116ce10431b21aba202a47a48004f252e.camel@uos.de> Subject: Unable to build Python38 ports like devel/py38-pycparser and even py38-setuptools From: "Dr. Peter Voigt" To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2021 21:03:19 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.38.3-1 List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-PMX-Version: vm411.rz.uni-osnabrueck.de (Univ. Osnabrueck) with PMX 6.4.6.2792898, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.2107409, Antispam-Data: 2021.11.27.182416, AntiVirus-Engine: 5.87.0, AntiVirus-Data: 2021.11.26.5870002 X-PMX-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report= HTML_00_01 0.05, HTML_00_10 0.05, BODY_SIZE_3000_3999 0, BODY_SIZE_5000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_7000_LESS 0, CT_TEXT_PLAIN_UTF8_CAPS 0, FROM_NAME_PHRASE 0, NO_CTA_FOUND 0, NO_CTA_URI_FOUND 0, NO_FUR_HEADER 0, NO_URI_HTTPS 0, __ANY_URI 0, __BODY_NO_MAILTO 0, __COURIER_PHRASE 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __FROM_DOMAIN_NOT_IN_BODY 0, __FROM_NAME_NOT_IN_BODY 0, __HAS_FROM 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __HEADER_ORDER_FROM 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_TEXT_P 0, __MIME_TEXT_P1 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __PHISH_SPEAR_SUBJ_PREDICATE 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __SUBJ_ALPHA_END 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __TO_NO_NAME 0, __URI_NO_MAILTO 0, __URI_NO_WWW 0, __USER_AGENT 0 X-PMX-Spam-Level: IIIIIIII X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4J1jGy3nBKz3KZH X-Spamd-Bar: + Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of pvoigt@uos.de designates 131.173.16.143 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=pvoigt@uos.de X-Spamd-Result: default: False [1.09 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:131.173.16.0/22]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.49)[0.492]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[uos.de]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(1.00)[1.000]; FROM_NAME_HAS_TITLE(1.00)[dr]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:680, ipnet:131.173.0.0/16, country:DE]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[131.173.16.143:from] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N I am currently facing a strange problem when tryping to upgrade following ports: # pkg version -vIL= py38-pycparser-2.20 < needs updating (index has 2.21) py38-pyparsing-3.0.4 < needs updating (index has 3.0.6) py38-snowballstemmer-2.1.0 < needs updating (index has 2.2.0) All mentioned ports cannot be upgraded from ports source tree. For e.g. py38-pycparser I get: ===>>> Starting build for devel/py-pycparser@py38 <<<=== ===>>> All dependencies are up to date ===> Cleaning for py38-pycparser-2.21 ===> License BSD3CLAUSE accepted by the user ===> py38-pycparser-2.21 depends on file: /usr/local/sbin/pkg - found ===> Fetching all distfiles required by py38-pycparser-2.21 for building ===> Extracting for py38-pycparser-2.21 => SHA256 Checksum OK for pycparser-2.21.tar.gz. ===> Patching for py38-pycparser-2.21 ===> py38-pycparser-2.21 depends on package: py38-setuptools>0 - found ===> py38-pycparser-2.21 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/python3.8 - found ===> Configuring for py38-pycparser-2.21 Traceback (most recent call last): File "", line 1, in File "setup.py", line 35, in setup( File "/usr/local/lib/python3.8/site-packages/setuptools/__init__.py", line 153, in setup return distutils.core.setup(**attrs) File "/usr/local/lib/python3.8/distutils/core.py", line 108, in setup _setup_distribution = dist = klass(attrs) File "/usr/local/lib/python3.8/site-packages/setuptools/dist.py", line 455, in __init__ _Distribution.__init__(self, { File "/usr/local/lib/python3.8/distutils/dist.py", line 292, in __init__ self.finalize_options() File "/usr/local/lib/python3.8/site-packages/setuptools/dist.py", line 800, in finalize_options for ep in sorted(eps, key=by_order): File "/usr/local/lib/python3.8/site-packages/setuptools/dist.py", line 799, in eps = map(lambda e: e.load(), pkg_resources.iter_entry_points(group)) File "/usr/local/lib/python3.8/site- packages/pkg_resources/__init__.py", line 2449, in load self.require(*args, **kwargs) File "/usr/local/lib/python3.8/site- packages/pkg_resources/__init__.py", line 2472, in require items = working_set.resolve(reqs, env, installer, extras=self.extras) File "/usr/local/lib/python3.8/site- packages/pkg_resources/__init__.py", line 772, in resolve raise DistributionNotFound(req, requirers) pkg_resources.DistributionNotFound: The 'packaging>=20.0' distribution was not found and is required by the application *** Error code 1 Stop. make: stopped in /usr/ports/devel/py-pycparser ===>>> make build failed for devel/py-pycparser@py38 ===>>> Aborting update ===>>> You can restart from the point of failure with this command line: portmaster devel/py-pycparser@py38 This command has been saved to ~/portmasterfail.txt The error is the same for the remaining two other ports. And even if I tryp to reinstall py38-setuptools I get the same error. I am out of ideas and during my attempts to narrow down the error I reinstalled python38 - which at least works without problems. My Python and PIP versions are: # pkg version |grep -iE "pip|python38" py38-pip-20.3.4 = python38-3.8.12_1 = From nobody Sat Nov 27 22:13:43 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA7A318BA67D for ; Sat, 27 Nov 2021 22:13:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marklmi@yahoo.com) Received: from sonic313-20.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (sonic313-20.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com [98.137.65.83]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4J1m9F4Dwzz4lS1 for ; Sat, 27 Nov 2021 22:13:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marklmi@yahoo.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1638051226; bh=2LWe6DR6YQFu0EY56mKIjFQO0WeILONk2iAmgg7Jv1A=; h=From:Subject:Date:References:To:In-Reply-To:From:Subject:Reply-To; b=TkZV5S4fmWnTldvkWU1PwhFUk7Bzpoa0/mR+smhVDLOs+fBACygjdos/pZ88Qok1zlZXgbz5Di5WyOk7F0YkV9FZ3ay6fHMHb0hgvB+e1tlgcvsJkGNpPRJX4Q6paDWfHaw1lSGSlAc/tS7MIU51FjsYS1RvO4YFdHzpkM2Wkt31UQrEFiCXx/02bdiNKMvUcCegctPEipGLQFS1PLvHvM8/XBX4IeEKegL4IY9DKXSVjanTFpKIxw4R8zwUZ2NVJ5hVgqT+ohc5yBn0465AwStL2dLpJYB16Q+KLR+2rSOudpoPbn5bx/MpKKbNtDagF6Mua48OIEwD0ir9BUKxow== X-SONIC-DKIM-SIGN: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1638051226; bh=SSvcLUkr64sLgCc+H9adsndLRXQ32u1MYAxziEKKw8d=; h=X-Sonic-MF:From:Subject:Date:To:From:Subject; b=SwLWkYSKqIr5h5HO02bnPE+QQ4VMg7ECQ4NiYt0badAIjYEp2F6RDCxS5x5agJM8x4/WzjtGyU6jPHDgexJ+FZmcPw4kQgmwOGHSBz6jehFo7eh6mjuW2ZNMZgArPGzmzSLuJcS2b/DRGMycZKdT/2WlPnwerWwGa5Aeury3roD5U85PYNrh6lm2Pu04vqxjE1zO3bl5MKS7mwf4SC4z27ciJfNfviAtAy5dTyf9Hfd/JgkWmbAoeip+sg3oNSvO2ZV35Sb+hKmAO/Z+SQ7Scf9b7B7nfEAUjpE67XfeI1KNNeco9mPMomon/YTyk59x0QU2ZiKmIlz6bFOBhdIPAw== X-YMail-OSG: rm_r7CIVM1m.OpYCrtjllxxobY3yPLahW5Uea37naLzZy1hJRlE1HRryUtN70R9 iNpjwHYAWgp8XRFBBDjU9J6zXn45m4iNcmi1mW_MQvO.eaVj8kOZetMOdpE3.6pEFpXSVMF85GEb yzEQ2s6CjZm9EV27u1CJ96AEUFQudAvr.Bv_KdMHBsG42Qhe9iwa6vA8P21ryr3LZI19So8LQ7IB qrjsjWiZKeeGbCkUO1IvcJkYujusrFtVDc3EnxJAb17Jdb3lHCeopDnUylxyw7h3ROwuGUH2k4CS EtLH.9etJgbUjaiTIETAcFRMhyye4wnJltYT47h5GRuk8AOtpxBAhOQjseV92dDE0Azyn0PkvVlF xgTDAoQJX8KvE05cD2LmhgpbfZPgzuWmSHCCHSGzZ9G7oTdRh0nie7SND7256y1l305MkIU4EJP7 q0krWJYgE0rgeNnRf8d68vyzIVctV7DErDmXd892YnEuYsIk1n6Gti4AhxNGCjR_ChobnJ4Xk4En 6PEWGQc0OL8bEP7QMEfDTScReFcppCY8_LC.ZJSSS5GUMOzoBpAunfwymY.eTx3ECuyx_OcE.Kj1 kh.JB5_mzxpIxat7.2pE03wPxUx.TbWVJSV_MDvyufhLePK8L_d4XuFHhsnzTCG7GX6V40Ijp_Bk 9cOP_.XNMdcEWo0GD8Lq7x2fQZYG1LBwb4d8poovz.XhrhGUK1UtT9qatp3d7TGDdxwd8MIsqZdo HrWZBwX8fmWVoTY5rcQ_g2_zOKpqlyTFt_31zQDEXsdSlKWu9PdP.UzM6sABSuIxrZuVBJs8RRJO lws_i6OlHf9yAv7MJUKPK4PhJeA0T2xw46EtF9HMm6vXvD75VzclP0xhAzMiKsnNvVaH_rW_IgdP lABiuQGwfdBKsxKDh0bhwN62e1BYOL7JCXcQFEAeWbb5aYGTpdD0iJPCdOnOJck.jo5mvg0.Pq5P MJ6eWlmAcdbZocG6ezEisIXxlALCRrcqUQk6IVdWZ_lAiW1LP2Zr_C_SlL9vKDvzjpNyXnQpdDLA AEmQgbi3FuIbWPtUEYT4Fj4pIPI58GweGrNuM.66hCe3vP7SiuXE.ZiYi7.03CIRbjKOw4dgaUDV xgQ_g9Of6ppMESv7nsuFXWtXMKyK4txzgPB7uj8ZD7UcN7QjTjCW.fGJcwV_Igo0UDla.6ZoYhlU ZKQ385ke5BPESL5s.qhtLwFJ14cuToX.PlRr5y9RbDPF1lV7CfJGZabGx7.VqBBNGOsWMB7HaUEY M.62YAhkAWeIEG1_dfIT8TZx3jb1Xa8iBdOhmkU2HO.e9hzPFojllTmS6V9PbFHrlCIdVObRj84d pNLT1SdQsYbyXSKLr9dAmtuvK5yvMqwbMqDLqJ2.kbpQC3TC9EZ__Iz0VZHuNU8zhzxvuBG4Jaxm qI9L2CKfkL6Clcy4k0xijmZ3lJ2y_LK._h3MTbTFhHXZGOJ4xc2ZS9eBEZ.BrcOTHAkL57mByyUd .XEvZ4ZmhYnbAoRPjCxUV.mbFSoHDGjm8lNiEJF6v_zoS7a1GgDGVYOW73R3anLBphJWODmziqKO FRWB1.8i6JJsjc1yS69WNePH.q0G_yVY0dj.L2jklgj8KtoGBepIA5owzLZ_SutEVFA_AVgi_PHz I8CCZgukarMyrhTz1CKioPcUtKMKCw8ZEW7IJ00tqbVyAp.mQmH19WZsvSjiALecPDtcnHnIcw8y Yesj6IPAI4ukqMu2R5NAQNNWQwi8WUsiiClndMsSi.6VVcArNptUox13Ga.fl__9E.xoZZmd3mng szomomHp9H6QReRW2CnyJPfUHnIJbIR9VqEdbUyUWZUqa2b3mXKjr1BaEbKNk4U_4D9FvdDWv3OO 5M9EEhZhUkH3jWPh08SDKNgsb2linYtftdAxZefVnHVH73TkYrnkVjydCV_vdfg.UuO1W3WXBd9l m7Y.6X_zOzWj7niIrcfCE5X3gpB2SpPnYbYrXzM.R7W.9cSECoHE_OsKsBPLHKRZNWlzEpu1NMHW dGU3fFmwAZ21dMt85_wdQGLysg93YSYs3V2W5COnB.dwURDPbvm7XwoO3.BwUokTSiK_UN_F72ry jac_0nhpCCBEjsmPZ6pI3K_h5mf1UR6cToSLhXeR0lHkKF_WpJt7W.DOYK02u5NkKpudif_tjBlt JByS8DlRAol7QGzZmSS_RcoIpXRAf29JqrMraxL3JeeiBrr51XO8T.oEWf7j7dlAvpdRQtGHi4y5 h9I8J79hYodiU1BB4v0.O1RNZwiO1wIrWs14l97eNZSg- X-Sonic-MF: Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic313.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with HTTP; Sat, 27 Nov 2021 22:13:46 +0000 Received: by kubenode517.mail-prod1.omega.ne1.yahoo.com (VZM Hermes SMTP Server) with ESMTPA ID cba5b9a947c93fe8b08f61a71c5c6152; Sat, 27 Nov 2021 22:13:44 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.120.0.1.13\)) Subject: Re: armv7 main [so: 14] targeting via poudriere bulk builds: iperf3 fails to build: iperf_api.c:4460:5: error: unknown type name 'cpu_set_t'; did you mean 'cpuset_t'? Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2021 14:13:43 -0800 References: <2E8E8E81-A29F-47AB-A14D-8B60811FE7EE@yahoo.com> To: "bmah@freebsd.org" , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <2E8E8E81-A29F-47AB-A14D-8B60811FE7EE@yahoo.com> Message-Id: <34ED39B7-A7ED-4A0D-92D5-80F17240655D@yahoo.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.120.0.1.13) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4J1m9F4Dwzz4lS1 X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=yahoo.com header.s=s2048 header.b=TkZV5S4f; dmarc=pass (policy=reject) header.from=yahoo.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of marklmi@yahoo.com designates 98.137.65.83 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=marklmi@yahoo.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.37 / 15.00]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_SOME(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[yahoo.com]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ptr:yahoo.com]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[yahoo.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[yahoo.com,reject]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.87)[-0.869]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[yahoo.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:36647, ipnet:98.137.64.0/20, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[yahoo.com:dkim]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[yahoo.com:s=s2048]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[98.137.65.83:from]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[98.137.65.83:from]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] Reply-To: marklmi@yahoo.com From: Mark Millard via freebsd-ports X-Original-From: Mark Millard X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N On 2021-Nov-27, at 06:04, Mark Millard wrote: > Notably amd64 targeting did not have this problem. I've not > tried aarch64 targeting yet. I've now built for aarch64 based on the same /usr/ports as used for the other builds and iperf3 built fione. I do not know about 32-bit or 64-bit powerpc but armv7 (and probably armv6 ?) seems to need the _WITH_CPU_SET_T opt-in (or needs to be implemented differently to avoid using the missing names). > Still, it looks like iperf3 needs the #define _WITH_CPU_SET_T > opt-in someplace: >=20 > --- iperf_api.lo --- > iperf_api.c:4460:5: error: unknown type name 'cpu_set_t'; did you mean = 'cpuset_t'? > cpu_set_t cpu_set; > ^~~~~~~~~ > cpuset_t > /usr/include/sys/_cpuset.h:50:24: note: 'cpuset_t' declared here > typedef struct _cpuset cpuset_t; > ^ > iperf_api.c:4464:9: warning: implicit declaration of function = 'sched_setaffinity' is invalid in C99 [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] > if (sched_setaffinity(0, sizeof(cpu_set_t), &cpu_set) !=3D 0) { > ^ > iperf_api.c:4464:37: error: use of undeclared identifier 'cpu_set_t'; = did you mean 'cpuset'? > if (sched_setaffinity(0, sizeof(cpu_set_t), &cpu_set) !=3D 0) { > ^~~~~~~~~ > cpuset > /usr/include/sys/cpuset.h:156:5: note: 'cpuset' declared here > int cpuset(cpusetid_t *); > ^ > iperf_api.c:4506:5: error: unknown type name 'cpu_set_t'; did you mean = 'cpuset_t'? > cpu_set_t cpu_set; > ^~~~~~~~~ > cpuset_t > /usr/include/sys/_cpuset.h:50:24: note: 'cpuset_t' declared here > typedef struct _cpuset cpuset_t; > ^ > iperf_api.c:4512:9: warning: implicit declaration of function = 'sched_setaffinity' is invalid in C99 [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] > if (sched_setaffinity(0, sizeof(cpu_set_t), &cpu_set) !=3D 0) { > ^ > iperf_api.c:4512:37: error: use of undeclared identifier 'cpu_set_t'; = did you mean 'cpuset'? > if (sched_setaffinity(0, sizeof(cpu_set_t), &cpu_set) !=3D 0) { > ^~~~~~~~~ > cpuset > /usr/include/sys/cpuset.h:156:5: note: 'cpuset' declared here > int cpuset(cpusetid_t *); > ^ > 2 warnings and 4 errors generated. > *** [iperf_api.lo] Error code 1 >=20 > make[3]: stopped in = /wrkdirs/usr/ports/benchmarks/iperf3/work/iperf-3.10.1/src >=20 > For reference: >=20 > # uname -apKU > FreeBSD CA72_16Gp_ZFS 14.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 14.0-CURRENT #22 = main-n250972-319e9fc642a1-dirty: Tue Nov 23 12:25:36 PST 2021 = root@CA72_16Gp_ZFS:/usr/obj/BUILDs/main-CA72-nodbg-clang/usr/main-src/arm6= 4.aarch64/sys/GENERIC-NODBG-CA72 arm64 aarch64 1400042 1400042 >=20 > # poudriere jail -jmain-CA7 -i > Jail name: main-CA7 > Jail version: 14.0-CURRENT > Jail arch: arm.armv7 > Jail method: null > Jail mount: /usr/obj/DESTDIRs/main-CA7-poud > Jail fs: =20 > Jail updated: 2021-06-27 17:58:33 > Jail pkgbase: disabled >=20 > # uname -apKU > FreeBSD CA72_16Gp_ZFS 14.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 14.0-CURRENT #22 = main-n250972-319e9fc642a1-dirty: Tue Nov 23 12:25:36 PST 2021 = root@CA72_16Gp_ZFS:/usr/obj/BUILDs/main-CA72-nodbg-clang/usr/main-src/arm6= 4.aarch64/sys/GENERIC-NODBG-CA72 arm armv7 1400042 1400042 =3D=3D=3D Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away in early 2018-Mar) From nobody Sun Nov 28 02:52:15 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11DBF18B1512 for ; Sun, 28 Nov 2021 02:52:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wr1-x42f.google.com (mail-wr1-x42f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42f]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1D4" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4J1tLs6ZGSz3m22 for ; Sun, 28 Nov 2021 02:52:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wr1-x42f.google.com with SMTP id a9so28170634wrr.8 for ; Sat, 27 Nov 2021 18:52:37 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=s2CaxLzn2K3HBjNe8LDMolJXolZs6zEjVfDJoKc/HhQ=; b=MKRAENEiTm/4iRGl7AAPP/TRR6ACHTLXJxHbA+9y6Hut7CLMw0jxFYYbheCX6D6jh7 gLdY+low8OJspjH8AAZXX2DrjmLapVQg4seUdeBOe0LzkQou9Asg6rQ0Wx1xIg8L50he MMJUT1oJhEcXFACH9GAESpaepnVvIvmuej86LMDggvOv2n6MaTZ3qHD756ag5671avqP QBrcv92NGfp0IHiqiPTRJ4H9qN1hZgmHNZ8eLMTOipEwxgsneir1ns4KndVFYpnGuyNA SDkK6ZNgg1YcTYe/e1ef/acsFJUJWhNwyvZvcGdQ0FrrOzWXdkJCvzjnFEUyvIoPctSx 74+Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=s2CaxLzn2K3HBjNe8LDMolJXolZs6zEjVfDJoKc/HhQ=; b=KC+Mv1vvglJE0UckJB2YdJU2HPPRneKVVTvio7hzoS3Fn9kRp/8HcR4H48EKbIsZbz ad6fHwKWwhVjB0ntuD0xFl9nhUhgwE0G839twC6sgp8prr6PhrPlsRRJGOSCiNF6I2yk fyXdlvuwGPPF0y9358MW52UrqRJpkY6hXGXVG35ramB7STIxLeE1G6QVolLyzIyM6oP2 Rda0wH1bJJYf8649HrDbx7w87sk2cCw+UN/TRcG7enc25rglZMOjjkttQpWrrnvwYRxh 61odSFOyHtEOh3pV5Obk/xYAZQ1cXDxocBipDwFhR+Sn+EZE6KlW7ND+3j/G/X1mTSgL goGA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532vJETC6KYSc2drPUwyL7CIGC3sdGAmub9LM4RJb8tz01dC8Sok zoO1wS3diONsLFNRLu/T9r0Cr2GyejddtfV/Gl09uu4wcETBC4tf X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzlMmrgkRplE/4gj1pnvXqDV/3YoazlifUn7Qtcv1fVTguxx9pMD668g7n+s2uTFT2VYXo5fiVeQ93MlxM4CKY= X-Received: by 2002:adf:ce12:: with SMTP id p18mr24404897wrn.549.1638067951504; Sat, 27 Nov 2021 18:52:31 -0800 (PST) List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4aabecf116ce10431b21aba202a47a48004f252e.camel@uos.de> In-Reply-To: <4aabecf116ce10431b21aba202a47a48004f252e.camel@uos.de> From: Kevin Oberman Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2021 18:52:15 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Unable to build Python38 ports like devel/py38-pycparser and even py38-setuptools To: "Dr. Peter Voigt" Cc: FreeBSD Ports ML Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000005e10d605d1d06a7e" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4J1tLs6ZGSz3m22 X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: Y --0000000000005e10d605d1d06a7e Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Sat, Nov 27, 2021 at 12:04 PM Dr. Peter Voigt wrote: > I am currently facing a strange problem when tryping to upgrade > following ports: > > # pkg version -vIL= > py38-pycparser-2.20 < needs updating (index has 2.21) > py38-pyparsing-3.0.4 < needs updating (index has 3.0.6) > py38-snowballstemmer-2.1.0 < needs updating (index has 2.2.0) > > All mentioned ports cannot be upgraded from ports source tree. For e.g. > py38-pycparser I get: > > ===>>> Starting build for devel/py-pycparser@py38 <<<=== > > ===>>> All dependencies are up to date > > ===> Cleaning for py38-pycparser-2.21 > ===> License BSD3CLAUSE accepted by the user > ===> py38-pycparser-2.21 depends on file: /usr/local/sbin/pkg - found > ===> Fetching all distfiles required by py38-pycparser-2.21 for > building > ===> Extracting for py38-pycparser-2.21 > => SHA256 Checksum OK for pycparser-2.21.tar.gz. > ===> Patching for py38-pycparser-2.21 > ===> py38-pycparser-2.21 depends on package: py38-setuptools>0 - > found > ===> py38-pycparser-2.21 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/python3.8 - > found > ===> Configuring for py38-pycparser-2.21 > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "", line 1, in > File "setup.py", line 35, in > setup( > File "/usr/local/lib/python3.8/site-packages/setuptools/__init__.py", > line 153, in setup > return distutils.core.setup(**attrs) > File "/usr/local/lib/python3.8/distutils/core.py", line 108, in setup > _setup_distribution = dist = klass(attrs) > File "/usr/local/lib/python3.8/site-packages/setuptools/dist.py", > line 455, in __init__ > _Distribution.__init__(self, { > File "/usr/local/lib/python3.8/distutils/dist.py", line 292, in > __init__ > self.finalize_options() > File "/usr/local/lib/python3.8/site-packages/setuptools/dist.py", > line 800, in finalize_options > for ep in sorted(eps, key=by_order): > File "/usr/local/lib/python3.8/site-packages/setuptools/dist.py", > line 799, in > eps = map(lambda e: e.load(), > pkg_resources.iter_entry_points(group)) > File "/usr/local/lib/python3.8/site- > packages/pkg_resources/__init__.py", line 2449, in load > self.require(*args, **kwargs) > File "/usr/local/lib/python3.8/site- > packages/pkg_resources/__init__.py", line 2472, in require > items = working_set.resolve(reqs, env, installer, > extras=self.extras) > File "/usr/local/lib/python3.8/site- > packages/pkg_resources/__init__.py", line 772, in resolve > raise DistributionNotFound(req, requirers) > pkg_resources.DistributionNotFound: The 'packaging>=20.0' distribution > was not found and is required by the application > *** Error code 1 > > Stop. > make: stopped in /usr/ports/devel/py-pycparser > > ===>>> make build failed for devel/py-pycparser@py38 > ===>>> Aborting update > > > ===>>> You can restart from the point of failure with this command > line: > portmaster devel/py-pycparser@py38 > > This command has been saved to ~/portmasterfail.txt > > The error is the same for the remaining two other ports. > > And even if I tryp to reinstall py38-setuptools I get the same error. > > I am out of ideas and during my attempts to narrow down the error I > reinstalled python38 - which at least works without problems. > > My Python and PIP versions are: > # pkg version |grep -iE "pip|python38" > py38-pip-20.3.4 = > python38-3.8.12_1 = > Seems like /usr/ports/UPDATING had been abandoned. The last update was over a year ago. This SHOULD have been in UPDATING. If I remember correctly, the fix is to de-install both py38-packaging and py38-setuptools. > pkg delete -f py38-setuptools > pkg delete -f py38-packaging > portmaster devel/pkg-packaging > portmaster devel/py-setuptools This assumes the use of portmaster, but it should work with whichever tool you use. The problem was that a function was moved between ports and, as a result, you can't build either port when the old version of either is installed. -- Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer E-mail: rkoberman@gmail.com PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683 --0000000000005e10d605d1d06a7e-- From nobody Sun Nov 28 05:20:54 2021 X-Original-To: ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 699D418AA166 for ; Sun, 28 Nov 2021 05:21:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from grahamperrin@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wm1-x32f.google.com (mail-wm1-x32f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32f]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1D4" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4J1xf74Hqyz4yPZ for ; Sun, 28 Nov 2021 05:21:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from grahamperrin@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wm1-x32f.google.com with SMTP id i8-20020a7bc948000000b0030db7b70b6bso14022529wml.1 for ; Sat, 27 Nov 2021 21:21:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject:content-language:to :references:from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=7RV78E50sTGTN+EmWZS4J8NXbVSY9aXT4KNcV6+Fvvk=; b=LulgGq9yVB0dy8iZLzGwf7tQ48idIhTukWejHo+7PJuIIhqMvcRe9MRoKa2JxKLOjf nWN2zJckDCe35vxHOLbVXKTbK2wZidOAJYse+/jQOvmGb7B018vN1Frk8dW39iopxmdC 3H77cVsza/2NLTR2gA9f7Dg4rSdT7+DbvMpwyLaD0LED7liYOTPq/CCKghBjX9qWcEMc 6R9ub2VlW9S1vI0jOJOV7VJbM0qo5F+tjLLCMQgWa/jN7iLk9Yoc5uWhyCSCXG6In2Kt TXJ4Bouy8+eMPgVJQhWurPssGaROtY/xIV3NMd/dt4Q0+HTnuOZPApJQUxD0XkhuNyHB nK2Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject :content-language:to:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=7RV78E50sTGTN+EmWZS4J8NXbVSY9aXT4KNcV6+Fvvk=; b=x1ONUakdF4ZJWxbM15pDcKOJYGbl4uQ4lrUMJrShfDw8ufG7sJtKAGI3uvLjeVOaG4 LScCCV3kYXb0jrMNODE/UQ+RKZk9R2cb/lIb+MsQBvchKWj1djbipR1SDUs1HsvBPCA2 vR82SdfkPDoA+DTLOGxrlwIAktPP+aISomZCejzcaMd+A0RLdp+mZxLbKhVe1LY5oNJr MNfzXg8JFjbK//omWBqi4xVW+CmzYvaYlGAWiE4HV/N/YTI/h228cTWOZi/yjL40m2e+ 3WQ6gojPsAZ84nA7nHzSUqq4kTpQPZ9wW3OVrO0tDMkZ8QCzwh7Vn1bZ3be8O1U9kjmk 59IA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533QEvgEA0SyiY/lHCLI+xo2G5qCDCrCEqa73ZGQjSv5OJ7UUb/+ dy0MlrsVLS9W/kHm9o7GzKc9TFcfBYM2Rw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwVHhxWnPI3uRqFWLZ0LZvGy+jKpBtjMQIOmTsmSgbIuann9RN6qU0sA5bfXVM8rVh9SBYDRw== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:f005:: with SMTP id a5mr28250658wmb.19.1638076855828; Sat, 27 Nov 2021 21:20:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPV6:2001:470:1f1c:a0::2? (tunnel642390-pt.tunnel.tserv1.lon2.ipv6.he.net. [2001:470:1f1c:a0::2]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u13sm4240111wmq.14.2021.11.27.21.20.55 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 27 Nov 2021 21:20:55 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2021 05:20:54 +0000 List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.3.2 Subject: (260087) log of changes to /usr/ports/UPDATING (was: Unable to build Python38 ports like devel/py38-pycparser and even py38-setuptools) Content-Language: en-GB To: ports@freebsd.org References: <4aabecf116ce10431b21aba202a47a48004f252e.camel@uos.de> From: Graham Perrin In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4J1xf74Hqyz4yPZ X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=LulgGq9y; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of grahamperrin@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4864:20::32f as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=grahamperrin@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.98 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20210112]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a00:1450:4000::/36:c]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[ports@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.98)[-0.981]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2a00:1450:4864:20::32f:from]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2a00:1450::/32, country:US]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com:dkim] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N On 28/11/2021 02:52, Kevin Oberman wrote: > … like /usr/ports/UPDATING had been abandoned. The last update was over > a year ago. … Either Kevin's ports tree is more than a year out of date, or (more likely) we're disoriented by :-) From nobody Sun Nov 28 12:57:00 2021 X-Original-To: ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3A4618ADF26 for ; Sun, 28 Nov 2021 12:57:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pvoigt@uos.de) Received: from mta-out-1-1.rz.uni-osnabrueck.de (mta-out-1-1.rz.uni-osnabrueck.de [131.173.18.148]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4J27mr43dvz3Pv0 for ; Sun, 28 Nov 2021 12:57:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pvoigt@uos.de) Received: from vm412.rz.uni-osnabrueck.de (smtp-auth-2.serv.uni-osnabrueck.de [131.173.17.0]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mta-out-1-1.rz.uni-osnabrueck.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 469626E8737 for ; Sun, 28 Nov 2021 13:57:24 +0100 (CET) Received: from spock.drpetervoigt.eu (spock.drpetervoigt.eu [217.91.107.36]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: pvoigt) by vm412.rz.uni-osnabrueck.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 186031725090 for ; Sun, 28 Nov 2021 13:57:03 +0100 (CET) Received: from kirk.drpetervoigt.private (kirk.drpetervoigt.private [192.168.1.60]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: pvoigt) by spock.drpetervoigt.eu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9FB851062F4 for ; Sun, 28 Nov 2021 13:57:01 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <8978a64921090e7b4df8c18cee129d7cdb94a62e.camel@uos.de> Subject: Re: Unable to build Python38 ports like devel/py38-pycparser and even py38-setuptools From: "Dr. Peter Voigt" To: ports@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2021 13:57:00 +0100 In-Reply-To: <4aabecf116ce10431b21aba202a47a48004f252e.camel@uos.de> References: <4aabecf116ce10431b21aba202a47a48004f252e.camel@uos.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.38.3-1 List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-PMX-Version: vm412.rz.uni-osnabrueck.de (Univ. Osnabrueck) with PMX 6.4.6.2792898, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.2107409, Antispam-Data: 2021.11.28.123916, AntiVirus-Engine: 5.87.0, AntiVirus-Data: 2021.11.28.5870000 X-PMX-Spam: Gauge=X, Probability=10%, Report= TO_IN_SUBJECT 0.5, HTML_00_01 0.05, HTML_00_10 0.05, BODY_SIZE_4000_4999 0, BODY_SIZE_5000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_7000_LESS 0, CT_TEXT_PLAIN_UTF8_CAPS 0, FROM_NAME_PHRASE 0, IN_REP_TO 0, MSG_THREAD 0, NO_CTA_FOUND 0, NO_CTA_URI_FOUND 0, NO_FUR_HEADER 0, NO_URI_HTTPS 0, REFERENCES 0, __ANY_URI 0, __BANNER_TRUSTED_SENDER 0, __BODY_NO_MAILTO 0, __BOUNCE_CHALLENGE_SUBJ 0, __BOUNCE_NDR_SUBJ_EXEMPT 0, __COURIER_PHRASE 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __FORWARDED_MSG 0, __FROM_DOMAIN_NOT_IN_BODY 0, __HAS_FROM 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __HAS_REFERENCES 0, __HEADER_ORDER_FROM 0, __HIGHBITS 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __MAIL_CHAIN 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_TEXT_P 0, __MIME_TEXT_P1 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __PHISH_SPEAR_SUBJ_PREDICATE 0, __REFERENCES 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __SUBJ_ALPHA_END 0, __SUBJ_ALPHA_NEGATE 0, __SUBJ_REPLY 0, __TO_IN_SUBJECT 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __TO_NO_NAME 0, __URI_NO_MAILTO 0, __URI_NO_WWW 0, __USER_AGENT 0 X-PMX-Spam-Level: X X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4J27mr43dvz3Pv0 X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of pvoigt@uos.de designates 131.173.18.148 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=pvoigt@uos.de X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.13 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.97)[-0.974]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:131.173.16.0/22]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[ports@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[uos.de]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED(-0.40)[131.173.18.148:from,131.173.17.0:received]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.82)[0.815]; FROM_NAME_HAS_TITLE(1.00)[dr]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.28)[-0.275]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:680, ipnet:131.173.0.0/16, country:DE]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N I could finally solve the issue. Obvously, py38-packaging was missing. Unfortunately, portmaster did not detect the dependency I devel/py- packaging could not even be installed using portmaster. But a "make install" helped. Subsequently I could upgrade the initially mentioned ports. I am not sure, if it is a portmaster or a whatever dependency problem. On Sat, 2021-11-27 at 21:03 +0100, Dr. Peter Voigt wrote: > I am currently facing a strange problem when tryping to upgrade > following ports: > > # pkg version -vIL=           > py38-pycparser-2.20                <   needs updating (index has > 2.21) > py38-pyparsing-3.0.4               <   needs updating (index has > 3.0.6) > py38-snowballstemmer-2.1.0         <   needs updating (index has > 2.2.0) > > All mentioned ports cannot be upgraded from ports source tree. For > e.g. > py38-pycparser I get: > > ===>>> Starting build for devel/py-pycparser@py38 <<<=== > > ===>>> All dependencies are up to date > > ===>  Cleaning for py38-pycparser-2.21 > ===>  License BSD3CLAUSE accepted by the user > ===>   py38-pycparser-2.21 depends on file: /usr/local/sbin/pkg - > found > ===> Fetching all distfiles required by py38-pycparser-2.21 for > building > ===>  Extracting for py38-pycparser-2.21 > => SHA256 Checksum OK for pycparser-2.21.tar.gz. > ===>  Patching for py38-pycparser-2.21 > ===>   py38-pycparser-2.21 depends on package: py38-setuptools>0 - > found > ===>   py38-pycparser-2.21 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/python3.8 > - > found > ===>  Configuring for py38-pycparser-2.21 > Traceback (most recent call last): >   File "", line 1, in >   File "setup.py", line 35, in >     setup( >   File "/usr/local/lib/python3.8/site- > packages/setuptools/__init__.py", > line 153, in setup >     return distutils.core.setup(**attrs) >   File "/usr/local/lib/python3.8/distutils/core.py", line 108, in > setup >     _setup_distribution = dist = klass(attrs) >   File "/usr/local/lib/python3.8/site-packages/setuptools/dist.py", > line 455, in __init__ >     _Distribution.__init__(self, { >   File "/usr/local/lib/python3.8/distutils/dist.py", line 292, in > __init__ >     self.finalize_options() >   File "/usr/local/lib/python3.8/site-packages/setuptools/dist.py", > line 800, in finalize_options >     for ep in sorted(eps, key=by_order): >   File "/usr/local/lib/python3.8/site-packages/setuptools/dist.py", > line 799, in >     eps = map(lambda e: e.load(), > pkg_resources.iter_entry_points(group)) >   File "/usr/local/lib/python3.8/site- > packages/pkg_resources/__init__.py", line 2449, in load >     self.require(*args, **kwargs) >   File "/usr/local/lib/python3.8/site- > packages/pkg_resources/__init__.py", line 2472, in require >     items = working_set.resolve(reqs, env, installer, > extras=self.extras) >   File "/usr/local/lib/python3.8/site- > packages/pkg_resources/__init__.py", line 772, in resolve >     raise DistributionNotFound(req, requirers) > pkg_resources.DistributionNotFound: The 'packaging>=20.0' > distribution > was not found and is required by the application > *** Error code 1 > > Stop. > make: stopped in /usr/ports/devel/py-pycparser > > ===>>> make build failed for devel/py-pycparser@py38 > ===>>> Aborting update > > > ===>>> You can restart from the point of failure with this command > line: >        portmaster devel/py-pycparser@py38 > > This command has been saved to ~/portmasterfail.txt > > The error is the same for the remaining two other ports. > > And even if I tryp to reinstall py38-setuptools I get the same error. > > I am out of ideas and during my attempts to narrow down the error I > reinstalled python38 - which at least works without problems. > > My Python and PIP versions are: > # pkg version |grep -iE "pip|python38" > py38-pip-20.3.4                    = > python38-3.8.12_1                  = > > > From nobody Sun Nov 28 15:16:27 2021 X-Original-To: ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7D4718B08DC for ; Sun, 28 Nov 2021 15:16:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4J2Bs73XF6z4qdt for ; Sun, 28 Nov 2021 15:16:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (portscout.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A545113CF for ; Sun, 28 Nov 2021 15:16:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.nyi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.10]) by portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 1ASFGRPN034840 for ; Sun, 28 Nov 2021 15:16:27 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 1ASFGRNe034831; Sun, 28 Nov 2021 15:16:27 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <202111281516.1ASFGRNe034831@portscout.nyi.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.nyi.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2021 15:16:27 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1638112587; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding; bh=X1lxYY+AiuG52ioHA1066/5hNlr5cjVp9xCF6gPk/g8=; b=VL6TDkJLsVcbKtT8zZpXFg7nywN8nCP8Jrvq1pU6ZLHeu0WfYu3CpTg+b0GvTbKT1hh+3Q 5TyjSvz21gHf4158yN+DbClSebp14k+MZaxd3KMVuI8o4JwBy/sfMMO6juhb3is70LAJtk qS+cB5H9b//FUQmwS4A6LItxo4meSvtMn6w/ZQqgPoCTaPlZ+Q2gxEuvDfd5SLLCOP9jcT 106zmpT+g/FWpMzpUFwHYyAMTWqkZmVG9qpw/IGbZ414Xq6/4UfqdNweMW/iXAJscAwUDK n81Z/oMjRM4Cgjd2cIIUOtzkbvE1Fr2Bc1qTVLTmW3NbASDWBZyKGL3jucGhJg== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1638112587; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=AjV0Pp/XhJT3RIUNR75P2g/3fbMKPTjRMRYAgHRVVLlthJjdKvzu+lFOGq+6jm1FxZcw1d pYP7HNR4wa4ZRiLIpDN9fewVgw42Vp2cVad37+y67u0dgfDJHGyrcJNSYCuR1d6AUf/eXJ x9bvYWpiEM6cEkhEvORoWSQRFB3Jv9AHoEU5zMUex0/ZmHgAxbh9u1myRea7UpwXnONZBS DrlcyfsMLroAvdNI7eXHiaRjHPkb7n4kioG/XVxVoT68dyxL75aeH12Lxd7s0JjMXX4vuc MngrTy+62WShETVDsh4k3X52/Xuv3DnJvvCEKlhuDh+Uc9d90S3eevNIOTfT6g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ games/exult | 1.7.0.20211019 | snapshot-v1.7.0.20211128 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Reported by: portscout! From nobody Sun Nov 28 23:43:18 2021 X-Original-To: ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D63DD18B8B1F for ; Sun, 28 Nov 2021 23:43:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wr1-x429.google.com (mail-wr1-x429.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::429]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1D4" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4J2Q6K48LLz4mB3 for ; Sun, 28 Nov 2021 23:43:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wr1-x429.google.com with SMTP id d9so11867970wrw.4 for ; Sun, 28 Nov 2021 15:43:37 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=iOiDIpQ4KffdLtzsjvCs3AWKxfn5uWtTCzSWzIQTUCs=; b=nA0Ad4yHtqy+Uh2182zE+8GgMZytITIlMhzLXAwnraj4lVt8zQLcrYDS43ibnL5mmZ qEIJz5L9z2WYDHBhwBtTWOR9j0/Ms/wTsOuWicdlyl96HXKHCT8CQkgPICPotda4TTkk BTLj4hvePogfNcyXjhMH2md5nTVmtesnSFTCMpbSsDdS1jW+4HKTlGlY1jQTQcTD41xP xBJJR08umPUQ4uXMyUyn45sEPJukSLMSe9VrfJCQJEUXmKTmFRQfkwpMi6ePnFnECWRr 5eCfe1XipcyOfj3ayGUznStG2tTGqYSseokQgsp/bHp5NNTkm9/JZX8DaRQX/yKMMBRY 8elg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=iOiDIpQ4KffdLtzsjvCs3AWKxfn5uWtTCzSWzIQTUCs=; b=zb/5g0DR7tB0mTnllkzSG0OUc9aAuByFDZLcfH2Cd82asYHH9JhjyKD6/3ZLBaqsZJ d6G3BwhAS85MZZnqnBoBOua4fdtpxlDETWJ6k+xFtaWCfu8ARamxf/Np0K7bccR1zt2p +PdYrP+l+YfbEKCeLD5/o1fYyigBpE6zeDkjmMFUqk3juHl/SRQFKUDJpTeItZJMKW4N JUIQSdmgbMvnhavrvizoTsMLsAWZbrtzaOszNcichymEWiPqJfivov1ro8aEVCP1yD2f PLKfOjz1ngsgLz5cS1U7FtEbFzPgY3LD8F4TVqQSSMDUuL3Dat5HjlEb30zvvAAd7Fs5 yGIA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530B+0v9N7+DhCKYWccdOlWxfBKm8ySU8o4bIxrire2TWKAw1jjC 6p33avpBxdYz5NANF3vjBT9wcTrqvppslGczw20ViP7+TUolnSw6 X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyPDojHH7tReNiCAkJgiyHke6LZE8d/YKxmOBIQ4SAUQOo5vqHikeZHFkdeq3aQT+Fia1knL2foJjjQicly0zI= X-Received: by 2002:a5d:6a47:: with SMTP id t7mr31365948wrw.367.1638143015711; Sun, 28 Nov 2021 15:43:35 -0800 (PST) List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4aabecf116ce10431b21aba202a47a48004f252e.camel@uos.de> In-Reply-To: From: Kevin Oberman Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2021 15:43:18 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: (260087) log of changes to /usr/ports/UPDATING (was: Unable to build Python38 ports like devel/py38-pycparser and even py38-setuptools) To: Graham Perrin Cc: "ports@FreeBSD.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000008af4f605d1e1e40d" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4J2Q6K48LLz4mB3 X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: Y --0000000000008af4f605d1e1e40d Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Nov 27, 2021 at 9:22 PM Graham Perrin wrote: > > > On 28/11/2021 02:52, Kevin Oberman wrote: > > =E2=80=A6 like /usr/ports/UPDATING had been abandoned. The last update = was over > > a year ago. =E2=80=A6 > > Either Kevin's ports tree is more than a year out of date, or (more > likely) we're disoriented by > :-) You are right. I just looked at the date on the first entry, the only one displayed in the first screen, and assumed that it WAS the latest entry. Sorry. At least it should have been o obvious to me that something was wrong as I am sure that I have looked at UPDATING in the past year and found recent updates. Sorry about that. -- Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer E-mail: rkoberman@gmail.com PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683 --0000000000008af4f605d1e1e40d-- From nobody Mon Nov 29 14:30:13 2021 X-Original-To: ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DABE118B685E for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2021 14:30:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4J2nnK4PXWz3p7M for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2021 14:30:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (portscout.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7855224284 for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2021 14:30:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.nyi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.10]) by portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 1ATEUDgQ057582 for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2021 14:30:13 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 1ATEUDwO057581; Mon, 29 Nov 2021 14:30:13 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <202111291430.1ATEUDwO057581@portscout.nyi.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.nyi.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2021 14:30:13 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1638196213; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding; bh=6bBSt84W4hPUx8RBjBrjWOiX/nAQvJ3OvLMX75XheLg=; b=TKYSWOTdoUTGc7+6flEQ45e1nPuzlAd8EYJa4lUlRVx1wLPrd0bxx970N81ofCq11K0o+p de3JpDXLt0nQZLbLmBQ3VpNl2AXDab+e/BpaHv6sQTTcQqVeZqK+e9PvpICwbAL9Tb+Y54 T9gWpRFl7I1+3wXuh+vxbzlZcZL2bBCxzQee1O2s1Z1YS3jCKWL3ZVdihtjrjBB5vaKUTt grdZz7XRnQvSVSGrU2nhEW98ciltpOf3lNA9k/8oemwx2V8OzevObt+wmPoAt0rnxe8kYm YSQHS5ZI8WEC1FZCBEOI5kgyWg4ULMDrztkVIUwQy1AXPZBg6st6fC6xF5lNkg== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1638196213; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=K8pAyU8wDOxiFU34chbTauiAO213FG6YdeZxIACq6jExyLxcv//gC1GMzGUYQaSTbLK1ro SIo9DRENwBNuHefXEjj6SuhMfTjDam3zemHtN0FBE/eLZ9YHoRotdqlQJWtYogFURz4qBt Tpjbc4ggcHE6MP/xoPV+DUsUindc8coPn3+wcD83+PvAlzmP9Myax21tMoOUNFe5bVak4b iKhjjGGXqkky6bhhiAyn2IprTrbbptjkZEslP4MdAysfEP00Y0eMQD0T3/BKnLQNnU3Hlr G82JfmHZcMyeTzM9qVhxuBpRORdppHkn178XNur6NDPg46IjR4TMZsEFCVoiyQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ devel/py-spyder | 3.2.7 | v5.2.0 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ finance/moneymanagerex | 1.2.7 | v1.5.10 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ security/i2pd | 2.38.0 | 2.40.0 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Reported by: portscout! From nobody Mon Nov 29 22:19:31 2021 X-Original-To: ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E651318A8BE7 for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2021 22:19:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fuz@fuz.su) Received: from fuz.su (fuz.su [IPv6:2001:41d0:8:e508::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "amnesiac", Issuer "amnesiac" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4J30C10nrJz3Qxn for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2021 22:19:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fuz@fuz.su) Received: from fuz.su (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fuz.su (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPS id 1ATMJWLb025952 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2021 23:19:32 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from fuz@fuz.su) Received: (from fuz@localhost) by fuz.su (8.16.1/8.16.1/Submit) id 1ATMJVE0025951 for ports@freebsd.org; Mon, 29 Nov 2021 23:19:31 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from fuz) Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2021 23:19:31 +0100 From: Robert Clausecker To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Please revert commit a2bd861 Message-ID: List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4J30C10nrJz3Qxn X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of fuz@fuz.su designates 2001:41d0:8:e508::1 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=fuz@fuz.su X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.29 / 15.00]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+a]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[ports@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.99)[-0.988]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[fuz.su]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-0.998]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:16276, ipnet:2001:41d0::/32, country:FR]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N Commit a2bd861 (most recent commit on 2021Q4) breaks the ports build: [00:10:17] Warning: (www/firefox): Error: www/firefox depends on nonexistent origin 'devel/wasi-compiler-rt12'; Please contact maintainer of the port to fix this. [00:11:44] Error: Fatal errors encountered gathering initial ports metadata Please revert this commit so ports can be built. Ypurs, Robert Clausecker -- () ascii ribbon campaign - for an 8-bit clean world /\ - against html email - against proprietary attachments From nobody Tue Nov 30 00:54:15 2021 X-Original-To: ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FA7E1894878 for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2021 00:54:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from koobs.freebsd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pf1-x429.google.com (mail-pf1-x429.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::429]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1D4" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4J33dS2ykxz3GX5; Tue, 30 Nov 2021 00:54:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from koobs.freebsd@gmail.com) Received: by mail-pf1-x429.google.com with SMTP id u80so18762798pfc.9; Mon, 29 Nov 2021 16:54:20 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=sender:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:reply-to:subject :content-language:to:cc:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=2OH2ZLhRvEHVk5xHtq27UME+khetU3T1hsYY0dJm1Vc=; b=G08IH9BSNR7FjjmwECREEGOVAFUzgqw1U8WhStglz7jYMLxAgfsiCFpcR+Sla2n4qn fG2B3k9x3lUJWZ00Oh1I7jT86mONxFyaDAwrTwkjFqMiwl2WvgDX3z/RSW33gak6JLyO 268BBokJATNWvdAQh2hXuC4Rac5NezcLgFEvw3EWKRZwcT7ya5OVxinUbZ/bbMINg6j9 otzJHRieAMDB3gN31DSeqWL9ywHOPtNeZcP1eO4OC6Ld4GUEu1Xsw3uPkXQTyyHg8XQH +mqzV4QeeS9lCOwwQXlxum6AZIboVQWxqD6Lx1jPxAIHeSNDchWlWBGZaJnLX2bv0rkD Wivw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent :reply-to:subject:content-language:to:cc:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=2OH2ZLhRvEHVk5xHtq27UME+khetU3T1hsYY0dJm1Vc=; b=gk3rPEjvQWio0R8ewPOfRxOEp8o3t3idGk+W6PUguo11NLWmZv9n8tr4NGaIbYi007 M2s8sBhSNmhNCFm8JxtwFxQzJsP8F443jl0+5hHoTjFt1m2jkcEkxC04dZGCK5bA/Q01 j+DLtcbrlEXdzD2r6btitUR7UFWzjs/39nIiYLgcu2lxBT44wILg5eAfiw8sWjnuIgIR Roi2caGl0USHYTtdcrA8JBfTLqvGGrMV2wL1SirLGBgmRmIm/ZaeuT5m87mPZbZnc28B HWnWYuSKCubfLObNwX0r/ic0kmX733Y6IhT6zQWeHxYXv6uPNV/wVbLernbSEuASqa6m akKw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533HGS3ubIv4/qyeFuLUtTfhO1pGr8NuIxUk+m+AwH4c/qJ69NM6 OVCWPoJQzwq/zcqZD6dmlIb4C9yy8FA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJydEmZwv8Seee+w2fDGPQbDt3L45eqqKggrR4Ykd1rnqOGzE4uI4X5lRPknjYNmQK7Wg/fW+Q== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:148d:b0:49f:def7:9cfe with SMTP id v13-20020a056a00148d00b0049fdef79cfemr44292487pfu.69.1638233659580; Mon, 29 Nov 2021 16:54:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.102] (167-179-159-58.a7b39f.syd.nbn.aussiebb.net. [167.179.159.58]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k1sm19614299pfu.31.2021.11.29.16.54.17 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 29 Nov 2021 16:54:19 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <3406413b-a31d-a30f-5091-17af868df792@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2021 11:54:15 +1100 List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:96.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/96.0a1 Reply-To: koobs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Bringing back lang/python27 with few modules? Content-Language: en-US To: Rene Ladan Cc: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz>, Pau Amma , Maxim Sobolev , portmgr@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org References: <56cb1da0-311a-d498-f7a0-db2c0d11dca4@FreeBSD.org> <2adfb8979b5477639f4b4a214ef88a90@gundo.com> <325e53db-a47b-164b-949b-fbedaf10924b@FreeBSD.org> From: Kubilay Kocak In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4J33dS2ykxz3GX5 X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=G08IH9BS; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of koobsfreebsd@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::429 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=koobsfreebsd@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.15 / 15.00]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[koobs@FreeBSD.org]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36:c]; REPLYTO_ADDR_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[6]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[koobs@FreeBSD.org,koobsfreebsd@gmail.com]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.95)[-0.955]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20210112]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[koobs@FreeBSD.org,koobsfreebsd@gmail.com]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com:dkim]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-0.999]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[FreeBSD.org]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::429:from]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N On 26/11/2021 11:03 pm, Rene Ladan wrote: > On Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 10:39:15AM +1100, Kubilay Kocak wrote: >> On 23/11/2021 7:57 pm, Rene Ladan wrote: >>> On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 07:46:35PM +0100, Miroslav Lachman wrote: >>>> On 22/11/2021 10:46, Rene Ladan wrote: >>>>> On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 01:57:56AM +0000, Pau Amma wrote: >>>>>> On 2021-11-18 01:37, Kubilay Kocak wrote: >>>>>>> We've had many user reports over the last year re the entire >>>>>>> situation, including a number recently about pypy in particular. >>>>>> >>>>>> Late to the discussion, but I'm sad that Chromium survived the Python2.7 >>>>>> removal and Iridium didn't. :-( >>>>> >>>>> Upstream Iridium always seems to lag behind Chromium for a bit, but it is >>>>> doing OK now I geuss (one major version behind). The problem with Iridium >>>>> is also volunteer time to keep the port up to date, one Chromium-like port >>>>> is already a lot. >>>> >>>> Even if you are OK with Chromium, there are users for which Chromium is >>>> not an option and Iridium is more than just preferable. (or Ungoogled, >>>> or Brave or something else not so heavily tied to Google spying / tracking) >>>> >>>> Removing Iridium was a really bad step. >>>> >>> To all of those that keep complaining that Iridium got removed: >>> feel free to bring it back and maintain it. >>> >>> Regards, >>> René >>> >> >> Not helpful Rene. Thank you. > > Neither is your reply. > > René No Rene, it's always appropriate for anyone in the community to feel comfortable calling out inappropriate behaviour, and that is all that was done. If my reply serves only to make someone else in the community feel comfortable doing so in the future, it has served its purpose. If anyone feels uncomfortable with honest feedback about their behaviour, I would submit they spent a little more time considering the approach they take with the community prior to committing to interactions in future. If you'd like to discuss further, I'm always available for people who are motivated, interested, and would like to productively engage others. -- Regards, Kubilay From nobody Tue Nov 30 01:10:12 2021 X-Original-To: ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9921618AD543 for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2021 01:10:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jbeich@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [96.47.72.132]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4J33zx3yv5z3Mps; Tue, 30 Nov 2021 01:10:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jbeich@freebsd.org) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1638234621; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=grDSKNHNQltkWa3qMJyTRm570YrsUfHX6Oj3Alvls2I=; b=p+UAiLBP81BWcyIT3wHGVkrCrkPtdk3QRX7jBqBbSDEPrbRf21Rnln3Q5YcFsGc0ypLCMU B4ZnD89+LsbT7D6UVsk86ZH/4R84x6th4Frj3604rxwrnvf+przUnqxPORThk255kZOPcv 29YFAEwawUUumeoknJEHNvdrzJtUxpyomXGr8DZjJPot+rUcFO+7U3/IWsIqgUvK8PZKhT IMJu23Gv1EajwT8ZWa/EIkPcWp7qXMhRj+vGfLU9rrb0zNXYYDxqqp4VN0uBLoAOnSizBj vqvAOZTSWt95TSpS7qGqm8wSA+2LRoirkyqw1q6akCaCY2WAgBpEDqyYEPcMHA== Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1354) id 79CD71F1E7; Tue, 30 Nov 2021 01:10:21 +0000 (UTC) From: Jan Beich To: Robert Clausecker Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Please revert commit a2bd861 References: Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2021 02:10:12 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Robert Clausecker's message of "Mon, 29 Nov 2021 23:19:31 +0100") Message-ID: List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1638234621; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=grDSKNHNQltkWa3qMJyTRm570YrsUfHX6Oj3Alvls2I=; b=Rjmx2qd1xzDqNDdrx1KtbTcbRs0GS9Q8hYiQdIbw09R1BLWRv67leTNTJSOTbZcNCFdvYA EfeGAs7+z3x8L1YvVJZAb1gqhMcoX0bAIj/ZwhEsNJ7dylo0r2xixabW41RowhuibWCz2N dMO87bVq2FdXCZ27qPArMfY002ZJ7kPhtM13fepj+KsX4tyZ7+0fg63XeQ3xKGj3Mmj665 uIO+q9J7Cn0iitdEFRrXfzRqoCAz4CSo+PVPRIS0dv9ddv53EB5qCroKuOczew2oKluU1P TpsL6DpFxCqSw7gvmmMNhI1+SR8lGn5oXNs8yYxefMBo4jRlYwXwQeB1MGajLg== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1638234621; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=oeU2n/gRvY5DbspoaOx9ITvHf1tMAIyVuFHFSqoHR4Hg/iD6Z4XZZQDt5YyIWpMSgC5mQO eVgmYdBQcKfi7NA4Mgc8FrdQv/xyb9psNmAa4nf0kXC3vWhtpw+sh5JJoMHX8SSiszxV7X AR4Y9VEISDONNdaGCp2zjs63ujpkjwINj4HVKK5mVOVZQQshQJhI17YD3AJzlaFn/z+DI8 dti+iTYy1gVFozN7+O9NyKYmISUTgATgtLlx5UFIUSOJcEExTn8oCpm6T/xfLILA/5ldFg JLNx9tQBLto+IHnogDA1rOXiNuuFnsTcG+vuPzfJXsVJZnIu7H/5k7VjQBboSA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N Robert Clausecker writes: > Commit a2bd861 (most recent commit on 2021Q4) breaks the ports build: > > [00:10:17] Warning: (www/firefox): Error: www/firefox depends on > nonexistent origin 'devel/wasi-compiler-rt12'; Please contact > maintainer of the port to fix this. > [00:11:44] Error: Fatal errors encountered gathering initial ports metadata Mk/bsd.gecko.mk sets LLVM_DEFAULT=13 but respects user wishes from DEFAULT_VERSIONS in make.conf(5) unless LTO option is enabled. Unfortunately, while wasi-compiler-rt13 and wasi-compiler-rt11 do exist wasi-compiler-rt12 doesn't. Mixing LLVM subprojects from different major versions are unlikely to be supported. In short, the package cluster isn't affected due to using defaults. > Please revert this commit so ports can be built. Can you try the following instead? diff --git a/Mk/bsd.gecko.mk b/Mk/bsd.gecko.mk index b912e1aa7ade..efaa641294ca 100644 --- a/Mk/bsd.gecko.mk +++ b/Mk/bsd.gecko.mk @@ -93,7 +93,9 @@ MOZ_OPTIONS+= --with-libclang-path="${LOCALBASE}/llvm${LLVM_DEFAULT}/lib" MOZ_EXPORT+= LLVM_OBJDUMP="${LOCALBASE}/bin/llvm-objdump${LLVM_DEFAULT}" .endif # Ignore Mk/bsd.default-versions.mk but respect make.conf(5) unless LTO is enabled -.if !defined(DEFAULT_VERSIONS) || ! ${DEFAULT_VERSIONS:Mllvm*} || ${PORT_OPTIONS:MLTO} +# wasi-compiler-rt* is currently limited to llvm11 and llvm13 +.if !defined(DEFAULT_VERSIONS) || ! ${DEFAULT_VERSIONS:Mllvm*} || ${PORT_OPTIONS:MLTO} || \ + ${DEFAULT_VERSIONS:Mllvm=1[02]} || ${DEFAULT_VERSIONS:Mllvm=[7-9]0} LLVM_DEFAULT= 13 # chase bundled LLVM in lang/rust for LTO .endif # Require newer Clang than what's in base system unless user opted out From nobody Tue Nov 30 01:24:01 2021 X-Original-To: ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3405818B4D61 for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2021 01:24:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jbeich@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:6074::16:84]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4J34Hp10hWz3hyg; Tue, 30 Nov 2021 01:24:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jbeich@freebsd.org) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1638235446; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Nmzc3qfhgmpTLkl/rFSnIiO3jps8KgqaSEuAFDf3H+w=; b=Gb3pogCqCBmKQiYYAD5ZomQvmRDDJ4ddrl0zDlMbn/5RMlqac/2QrV5T3WM358SDoxIveY wZ9hraovcmnZfDf0vxjyY0RNfByx73nxVYPsaNQIbBRCjvkUVDG7FFJDFp+EDkWZtfw0oB bDZdVmCgWxDQkA6K27xgBUMor+gQvnsT98ew3OBs5AGAyVUbQImBqoxIK6meW0dylW4RrG FOeloRVpLxbRaLsV5TdkIWRwhwBxquL7HUH3Ja6ZXSmazgnZGwPYhU9FZz4kVefO6163Pd BgXM/Np0QIojhffYHnuMNUlS62BKb0kG2OClyfeVvFIMmba0LwAk/xDoqpJPvg== Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1354) id 08EC21F35B; Tue, 30 Nov 2021 01:24:06 +0000 (UTC) From: Jan Beich To: Robert Clausecker Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Please revert commit a2bd861 References: Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2021 02:24:01 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Jan Beich's message of "Tue, 30 Nov 2021 02:10:12 +0100") Message-ID: List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1638235446; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Nmzc3qfhgmpTLkl/rFSnIiO3jps8KgqaSEuAFDf3H+w=; b=mXnf2q8W6w0gr9Y1JHHM9vLNpwHbnrU5jeY8DvFoZssh2sBthtjfwmth67Y26D9tqjcx2F Le4HUfbW3akz40TZ2Y9y/RlHgKmNP81vwb6/8EWGhXgZcUnlIQ8jL/ENGBfb8NzFDEvJMo i5SNTt5U0FGTk7LRiYK2Y1vJFoXwuclG1Iei46Y/YQ2KY7lF1eUxl4ja8SfE9S72xpPlwd /VsWuVbop0V6nQx7XwxYFoctC4Y7rlDb29YgA4kU16kU/7bItLV8m1Rk3qUBDaqg0oyByk TrjgWZeM1ewu1IR96TvZk7pekvBgOPgzC/IhtVKfbbhkRNZ8MekIbrfPoDYZtQ== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1638235446; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=yDmCTxXPTU41hJKjttQ7XZovaxLZI+M7AYtZL1q40Q0AA7Xrxfu25WoBbjWkwtOd9eEsbT /3kd1whajRWgcjhbrC/TRupUML/PfJDiCZwk2UVMkNguox6cTB2THE3RiD+eteTGRMCG2S av2pVFwuPIGvie/ikfiC5tTZ4pMNK48k7A23dfGVObBUuG3oz/sm6orxV5pzbcKTTU8HGj 1ZzvRooeDq//yojh5dNaUAn6dHSZNfrN/e0eQeKQtWpWIqt2U/IuGbR1TrWyAoRHLzHCcD c9M2ln3abyYwn0QYmP6/bOj4KvD0YJsZzewCXMFn87q/7SadfyLTL1b74uk8RA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N Jan Beich writes: > Robert Clausecker writes: > >> Commit a2bd861 (most recent commit on 2021Q4) breaks the ports build: >> >> [00:10:17] Warning: (www/firefox): Error: www/firefox depends on >> nonexistent origin 'devel/wasi-compiler-rt12'; Please contact >> maintainer of the port to fix this. >> [00:11:44] Error: Fatal errors encountered gathering initial ports metadata > > Mk/bsd.gecko.mk sets LLVM_DEFAULT=13 but respects user wishes from > DEFAULT_VERSIONS in make.conf(5) unless LTO option is enabled. > Unfortunately, while wasi-compiler-rt13 and wasi-compiler-rt11 > do exist wasi-compiler-rt12 doesn't. Mixing LLVM subprojects from > different major versions are unlikely to be supported. > > In short, the package cluster isn't affected due to using defaults. Nevermind. I've missed this was about 2021Q4 where Mk/bsd.gecko.mk still has LLVM_DEFAULT=12 due to lang/rust version. From nobody Tue Nov 30 08:39:16 2021 X-Original-To: ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFE1418C0A9F for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2021 08:39:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joaquinito2051@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qv1-xf2c.google.com (mail-qv1-xf2c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::f2c]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1D4" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4J3FyH1XH9z4RVp for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2021 08:39:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joaquinito2051@gmail.com) Received: by mail-qv1-xf2c.google.com with SMTP id p3so10013982qvj.9 for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2021 00:39:35 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=kqgp+EiUder9RcgmhnPWxJC56Ar7JwNWc+oq6d/Fopc=; b=fWhZkReL8Kwg+pG/xmCvCpbMxYvHwppgFIp/AyjYRd3POCQugizOqn00pXMM8KXqSD UV5tIHGUcvrlrJ5w0OXfrZDbigIbQ3Th0l61lRpYYCJyuXUUx4qDseKVMxjQyB58oHzQ V61tMq8AdwrjqVA1Py36kJsdAFO5BrlEeLAcP6hWjgGeMexrWgh4CJrvg1KHwNzTrko/ ZAj1XbHf+Oah5qsWZAkHWIRcEhH2f/iuF2QUGEMe+2EoV9Aw5d0SkC/648lVdPkpmRfw 0gaAZWjY2dWe6AC7InVVLebo7oWD9X3jytqZ3FlbK0wvmsLpz83p6ltPpj/rqj0pB9qs 7CeQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=kqgp+EiUder9RcgmhnPWxJC56Ar7JwNWc+oq6d/Fopc=; b=CaDmzpXVDvS8NvFmbs6D5vwhORypAL5Q/f0Q7eYM1Nih6mEXUghxE4UNesbsLPLbrz ms0j3kdUcZfxfID2jD4A4iaHbaCnIFAq9wn2Dvs/JkQ8RGftkw0HL3NPiKYaTql/nB4e sl49Yg2kRHKtqxVyrk3CrVoumrTnjkAZoPtbc2otrKgz2L1g8LoNJRNMxGTH55k2EFiQ DQhlyiVMC2fYiOSw5at7SgJk+r8wSqN8xRxBSxmr07RnvgMFUKzemBL//kHo47POBXRB H+TH7H5kc1btYJ+XvXyaiP7IBTXhl1dcM2Mtzj7vsx7T+tWNzt9vIKuFPlaB682oV7wa c01w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5307Y1tR0XfJ1dU6QloDKMfn6JC0mVuSp4vD4IXoKUvWiqqVztaJ WlSbxm93Nlo3Xlo8zTgddHoaFMPGcQelE6rLhq3NGB4CDAqB8nzW X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwWCSbVJboJpLRq0Hlt4Csn4W7nzQpI+koozRbwC7g0oLC1uQVbzlBQuED2aag2bZx1nLuMuk8lPkR7nCn1HvY= X-Received: by 2002:ad4:4f2b:: with SMTP id fc11mr47601478qvb.45.1638261568638; Tue, 30 Nov 2021 00:39:28 -0800 (PST) List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Joaqu=C3=ADn_Rufo_Gutierrez?= Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2021 09:39:16 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: I need to become a castget maintainer. To: ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000d912e405d1fd7ec0" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4J3FyH1XH9z4RVp X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=fWhZkReL; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of joaquinito2051@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::f2c as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=joaquinito2051@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.40 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.40)[-0.399]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20210112]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[ports@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROMTLD(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::f2c:from]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com:dkim] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: Y --000000000000d912e405d1fd7ec0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hello. I need to become a castget maintainer. My email of my maintainer is joaquinito2051@gmail.com, and i will maintain the port, please. Thank you. --000000000000d912e405d1fd7ec0-- From nobody Tue Nov 30 09:08:12 2021 X-Original-To: ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3B4318AF1D5 for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2021 09:08:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ros@bebik.net) Received: from smtp.osorio.me (mvd.osorio.me [5.196.94.126]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4J3GbT1bNLz4clW for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2021 09:08:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ros@bebik.net) Received: from [192.168.75.84] (ns3309494.ip-5-135-160.eu [5.135.160.30]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.osorio.me (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2319F139340 for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2021 09:08:13 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2021 10:08:12 +0100 List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.3.0 Subject: Re: I need to become a castget maintainer. Content-Language: en-US To: ports@freebsd.org References: From: Rodrigo Osorio In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4J3GbT1bNLz4clW X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of ros@bebik.net designates 5.196.94.126 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=ros@bebik.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.80 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.98)[-0.981]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[ports@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.78)[-0.784]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[bebik.net]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.83)[-0.835]; RCVD_NO_TLS_LAST(0.10)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:16276, ipnet:5.196.0.0/16, country:FR]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N On 11/30/21 09:39, Joaquín Rufo Gutierrez wrote: > Hello. > I need to become a castget maintainer. > My email of my maintainer is joaquinito2051@gmail.com, and i will maintain > the port, please. > Thank you. > Hi Joakim, Thanks for your offer. The usual way to request a port maintenership is to open a bug report on FreeBSD bugzilla[1] and attach a patch with the changes (in this case the maintainers email). Also, the Porter Handbook{2] describe all the aspects of maintain a port, don't hesitate to take a look. Welcome aboard -- rodrigo [1] https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ [2] https://docs.freebsd.org/en/books/porters-handbook/ From nobody Tue Nov 30 09:13:03 2021 X-Original-To: ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5503718B319B for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2021 09:13:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fuz@fuz.su) Received: from fuz.su (fuz.su [IPv6:2001:41d0:8:e508::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "amnesiac", Issuer "amnesiac" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4J3Ghx0wQsz4gBY; Tue, 30 Nov 2021 09:13:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fuz@fuz.su) Received: from fuz.su (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fuz.su (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPS id 1AU9D3AB064915 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 30 Nov 2021 10:13:03 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from fuz@fuz.su) Received: (from fuz@localhost) by fuz.su (8.16.1/8.16.1/Submit) id 1AU9D39p064914; Tue, 30 Nov 2021 10:13:03 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from fuz) Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2021 10:13:03 +0100 From: Robert Clausecker To: Jan Beich Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Please revert commit a2bd861 Message-ID: References: List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4J3Ghx0wQsz4gBY X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N Hello Jan, Am Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 02:10:12AM +0100 schrieb Jan Beich: > Robert Clausecker writes: > > > Commit a2bd861 (most recent commit on 2021Q4) breaks the ports build: > > > > [00:10:17] Warning: (www/firefox): Error: www/firefox depends on > > nonexistent origin 'devel/wasi-compiler-rt12'; Please contact > > maintainer of the port to fix this. > > [00:11:44] Error: Fatal errors encountered gathering initial ports metadata > > Mk/bsd.gecko.mk sets LLVM_DEFAULT=13 but respects user wishes from > DEFAULT_VERSIONS in make.conf(5) unless LTO option is enabled. > Unfortunately, while wasi-compiler-rt13 and wasi-compiler-rt11 > do exist wasi-compiler-rt12 doesn't. Mixing LLVM subprojects from > different major versions are unlikely to be supported. > > In short, the package cluster isn't affected due to using defaults. This is not correct. In 2021Q4, bsd.gecko.mk sets LLVM_DEFAULT=12. Clearly this patch was not tested in 2021Q4 before it was committed there. I have not overridden this default in my own ports tree either. > > Please revert this commit so ports can be built. > > Can you try the following instead? > > diff --git a/Mk/bsd.gecko.mk b/Mk/bsd.gecko.mk > index b912e1aa7ade..efaa641294ca 100644 > --- a/Mk/bsd.gecko.mk > +++ b/Mk/bsd.gecko.mk > @@ -93,7 +93,9 @@ MOZ_OPTIONS+= --with-libclang-path="${LOCALBASE}/llvm${LLVM_DEFAULT}/lib" > MOZ_EXPORT+= LLVM_OBJDUMP="${LOCALBASE}/bin/llvm-objdump${LLVM_DEFAULT}" > .endif > # Ignore Mk/bsd.default-versions.mk but respect make.conf(5) unless LTO is enabled > -.if !defined(DEFAULT_VERSIONS) || ! ${DEFAULT_VERSIONS:Mllvm*} || ${PORT_OPTIONS:MLTO} > +# wasi-compiler-rt* is currently limited to llvm11 and llvm13 > +.if !defined(DEFAULT_VERSIONS) || ! ${DEFAULT_VERSIONS:Mllvm*} || ${PORT_OPTIONS:MLTO} || \ > + ${DEFAULT_VERSIONS:Mllvm=1[02]} || ${DEFAULT_VERSIONS:Mllvm=[7-9]0} > LLVM_DEFAULT= 13 # chase bundled LLVM in lang/rust for LTO > .endif > # Require newer Clang than what's in base system unless user opted out Will give it a try later. Yours, Robert Clausecker -- () ascii ribbon campaign - for an 8-bit clean world /\ - against html email - against proprietary attachments From nobody Tue Nov 30 14:17:25 2021 X-Original-To: ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D5C218C05D0 for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2021 14:17:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4J3PS56cYvz4dmb for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2021 14:17:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (portscout.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B37A617C8D for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2021 14:17:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.nyi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.10]) by portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 1AUEHPQu036986 for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2021 14:17:25 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 1AUEHPVl036985; Tue, 30 Nov 2021 14:17:25 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <202111301417.1AUEHPVl036985@portscout.nyi.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.nyi.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2021 14:17:25 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1638281846; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding; bh=A4KUaiCIoeFRpX4zGbW8IIn1DhlIuRzdFlD4w9bbch4=; b=nJfOEmRLzCk3lFUO9oKiV/Ye4UELW1d2hjr/MqZZ/NESrC98ZZOftNp6+sIIdRmNIffbzc DfT8xI7vHj59+Y61hzFqA5gzFGw/O5uOps3/e6YJ7blKfs0K8vkYAwSif9V931zcGHyQOI AZ0QFLfHc6SmcDNJnMEwEy34N5W2ZMcDbk0vNfl4U5qSAlHx6rrdlCIbJLR1mg9FAD+LKC Be0wxriDqNSCWJjPB1aMSoIo1XHMoPpYCPGkLPpKosyAm9ebELBiMltknfo4lQcLdhlnZ9 ISu4sbxNkFo7f2+VeL218BR631K0SZvHt8aZSOqJj9Q5/3W66QeJbBsXyGi5ng== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1638281846; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=xBPIq65a+O+lBuwLOw21PAj9+gZsf7Q+TSM7SFMzxn3Hf4tf/8YbaE81d+2D0665OlmoNe /CPWfsLnVwLZochnVNClcMzTXspGzOF94BEGjCBQuGcJgjtGDk2AQxlg5ycuUPh5stn/lI Awd/aTc3lXo3knkNev8yKXBBLjwGXMez5535ZxIZXK2aYPEO6btJNRjWL8nArm2OYBDKSk tJ2+ATLGvoAZPWcGVdWVA9pkjyk03/ElA4AbhbQS4k1AzB57XGzZC/n0tOb3izyFOERDR6 kPFXXt4rmBOXRiHklyChuFZWXFoVesShNvO1XSPoDaSi22VU54ux2P5WMQzRHg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ x11-fonts/py-QtAwesome | 1.0.3 | 1.1.1 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Reported by: portscout! From nobody Tue Nov 30 21:57:56 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC38D18BD21E; Tue, 30 Nov 2021 21:58:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from junchoon@dec.sakura.ne.jp) Received: from www121.sakura.ne.jp (www121.sakura.ne.jp [153.125.133.21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4J3bgX3Hr9z3px9; Tue, 30 Nov 2021 21:57:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from junchoon@dec.sakura.ne.jp) Received: from kalamity.joker.local (123-48-130-181.area1b.commufa.jp [123.48.130.181]) (authenticated bits=0) by www121.sakura.ne.jp (8.16.1/8.16.1/[SAKURA-WEB]/20201212) with ESMTPA id 1AULvusw006743; Wed, 1 Dec 2021 06:57:56 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from junchoon@dec.sakura.ne.jp) Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2021 06:57:56 +0900 From: Tomoaki AOKI To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Cc: Brooks Davis , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problem compiling ports Message-Id: <20211201065756.b8d50b150a88b0181f24ad89@dec.sakura.ne.jp> In-Reply-To: <20211130174530.GA75149@spindle.one-eyed-alien.net> References: <28612702.6783053.1638293085302.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <28612702.6783053.1638293085302@mail.yahoo.com> <20211130174530.GA75149@spindle.one-eyed-alien.net> Organization: Junchoon corps X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.33; amd64-portbld-freebsd13.0) List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4J3bgX3Hr9z3px9 X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N It would be better making new special handling like BE_AMDGPU for it. Building with BE_STANDARD just for this would be a pain for some users. (CC'ing freebsd-ports ML.) On Tue, 30 Nov 2021 17:45:30 +0000 Brooks Davis wrote: > In the config for devel/llvm11, is BE_STANDARD enabled? If not, you > won't have the web assembly backend. > > -- Brooks > > On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 05:24:45PM +0000, Filippo Moretti via current wrote: > > error: unable to create target: 'No available targets are compatible with triple "wasm32-unknown-wasi"' > > 1 error generated. > > gmake[3]: *** [Makefile:380: /usr/ports/devel/wasi-libc/work/wasi-libc-ad5133410f66b93a2381db5b542aad5e0964db96/build/dlmalloc/src/dlmalloc.o] Error 1 > > error: unable to create target: 'No available targets are compatible with triple "wasm32-unknown-wasi"' > > 1 error generated. > > gmake[3]: *** [Makefile:440: startup_files] Error 1 > > gmake[3]: Leaving directory '/usr/ports/devel/wasi-libc/work/wasi-libc-ad5133410f66b93a2381db5b542aad5e0964db96' > > ===> Compilation failed unexpectedly. > > Try to set MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE=yes and rebuild before reporting the failure to > > the maintainer. > > *** Error code 1 > > > > Stop. > > make[2]: stopped in /usr/ports/devel/wasi-libc > > *** Error code 1 > > > > Stop. > > make[1]: stopped in /usr/ports/devel/wasi-libcxx*** Error code 1 > > > > Stop. > > make: stopped in /usr/ports/www/firefox > > > > ===>>> make build failed for www/firefox > > ===>>> Aborting update > > > > > > ??File "/usr/local/lib/python3.8/site-packages/setuptools/dist.py", line 799, in > > ?????? eps = map(lambda e: e.load(), pkg_resources.iter_entry_points(group)) > > ?? File "/usr/local/lib/python3.8/site-packages/pkg_resources/__init__.py", line 2449, in load > > ?????? self.require(*args, **kwargs) > > ?? File "/usr/local/lib/python3.8/site-packages/pkg_resources/__init__.py", line 2472, in require > > ?????? items = working_set.resolve(reqs, env, installer, extras=self.extras) > > ?? File "/usr/local/lib/python3.8/site-packages/pkg_resources/__init__.py", line 772, in resolve > > ?????? raise DistributionNotFound(req, requirers) > > pkg_resources.DistributionNotFound: The 'packaging>=20.0' distribution was not found and is required by the application > > *** Error code 1 > > > > Stop. > > make: stopped in /usr/ports/devel/py-pycparser > > > > ===>>> make build failed for devel/py-pycparser@py38 > > ===>>> Aborting update > > > > FreeBSD sting 14.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 14.0-CURRENT #62 heads/main-n251146-d109559ddbf: Mon Nov 29 12:18:48 CET 2021???????? root@sting:/usr/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/sys/STING?? amd64 > > > > -- Tomoaki AOKI From nobody Tue Nov 30 22:45:37 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52E1C18AFD11; Tue, 30 Nov 2021 22:45:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brooks@spindle.one-eyed-alien.net) Received: from spindle.one-eyed-alien.net (spindle.one-eyed-alien.net [199.48.129.229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4J3ckV1rcdz4cTQ; Tue, 30 Nov 2021 22:45:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brooks@spindle.one-eyed-alien.net) Received: by spindle.one-eyed-alien.net (Postfix, from userid 3001) id 7EF4E3C0199; Tue, 30 Nov 2021 22:45:37 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2021 22:45:37 +0000 From: Brooks Davis To: Tomoaki AOKI Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problem compiling ports Message-ID: <20211130224537.GE75149@spindle.one-eyed-alien.net> References: <28612702.6783053.1638293085302.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <28612702.6783053.1638293085302@mail.yahoo.com> <20211130174530.GA75149@spindle.one-eyed-alien.net> <20211201065756.b8d50b150a88b0181f24ad89@dec.sakura.ne.jp> List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="cYtjc4pxslFTELvY" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20211201065756.b8d50b150a88b0181f24ad89@dec.sakura.ne.jp> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4J3ckV1rcdz4cTQ X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N --cYtjc4pxslFTELvY Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Yeah, I've got this in progress. -- Brooks On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 06:57:56AM +0900, Tomoaki AOKI wrote: > It would be better making new special handling like BE_AMDGPU for it. > Building with BE_STANDARD just for this would be a pain for some users. >=20 > (CC'ing freebsd-ports ML.) >=20 >=20 > On Tue, 30 Nov 2021 17:45:30 +0000 > Brooks Davis wrote: >=20 > > In the config for devel/llvm11, is BE_STANDARD enabled? If not, you > > won't have the web assembly backend. > >=20 > > -- Brooks > >=20 > > On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 05:24:45PM +0000, Filippo Moretti via current w= rote: > > > error: unable to create target: 'No available targets are compatible = with triple "wasm32-unknown-wasi"' > > > 1 error generated. > > > gmake[3]: *** [Makefile:380: /usr/ports/devel/wasi-libc/work/wasi-lib= c-ad5133410f66b93a2381db5b542aad5e0964db96/build/dlmalloc/src/dlmalloc.o] E= rror 1 > > > error: unable to create target: 'No available targets are compatible = with triple "wasm32-unknown-wasi"' > > > 1 error generated. > > > gmake[3]: *** [Makefile:440: startup_files] Error 1 > > > gmake[3]: Leaving directory '/usr/ports/devel/wasi-libc/work/wasi-lib= c-ad5133410f66b93a2381db5b542aad5e0964db96' > > > =3D=3D=3D> Compilation failed unexpectedly. > > > Try to set MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE=3Dyes and rebuild before reporting the fa= ilure to > > > the maintainer. > > > *** Error code 1 > > >=20 > > > Stop. > > > make[2]: stopped in /usr/ports/devel/wasi-libc > > > *** Error code 1 > > >=20 > > > Stop. > > > make[1]: stopped in /usr/ports/devel/wasi-libcxx*** Error code 1 > > >=20 > > > Stop. > > > make: stopped in /usr/ports/www/firefox > > >=20 > > > =3D=3D=3D>>> make build failed for www/firefox > > > =3D=3D=3D>>> Aborting update > > >=20 > > >=20 > > > ??File "/usr/local/lib/python3.8/site-packages/setuptools/dist.py", l= ine 799, in > > > ?????? eps =3D map(lambda e: e.load(), pkg_resources.iter_entry_point= s(group)) > > > ?? File "/usr/local/lib/python3.8/site-packages/pkg_resources/__init_= _.py", line 2449, in load > > > ?????? self.require(*args, **kwargs) > > > ?? File "/usr/local/lib/python3.8/site-packages/pkg_resources/__init_= _.py", line 2472, in require > > > ?????? items =3D working_set.resolve(reqs, env, installer, extras=3Ds= elf.extras) > > > ?? File "/usr/local/lib/python3.8/site-packages/pkg_resources/__init_= _.py", line 772, in resolve > > > ?????? raise DistributionNotFound(req, requirers) > > > pkg_resources.DistributionNotFound: The 'packaging>=3D20.0' distribut= ion was not found and is required by the application > > > *** Error code 1 > > >=20 > > > Stop. > > > make: stopped in /usr/ports/devel/py-pycparser > > >=20 > > > =3D=3D=3D>>> make build failed for devel/py-pycparser@py38 > > > =3D=3D=3D>>> Aborting update > > >=20 > > > FreeBSD sting 14.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 14.0-CURRENT #62 heads/main-n25114= 6-d109559ddbf: Mon Nov 29 12:18:48 CET 2021???????? root@sting:/usr/obj/usr= /src/amd64.amd64/sys/STING?? amd64 > > >=20 > > >=20 >=20 >=20 > --=20 > Tomoaki AOKI >=20 --cYtjc4pxslFTELvY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJhpqmQAAoJEKzQXbSebgfAZGMH/RHhlGbl+KJtRU7AuXEA24jN tQnKT5k8NUBbvA1kOSlJiSZxc9izTumi4A9VvK328vkPh2vRP0rLbSN3uJY6yqMd KNfiLinwsq86JzbzuuGfY1SKcy4aQckGYWjIo/tjjShMupZfmbucOpTTELhifW7W udbnOrIwRiHe6d+bbGEGlQY7oORO244poKisWzYvM5NE8M/TVvi7xX9tgAHxgYmd D+AyoWg6g3I/KWj0aZa/uoSgnzQ6WKRGlX7T+msV6jF1oBJgslg6zUuwoO7fvifL h5orrssGt5JdE9tShSu7QqoDL2hFqt/b0ex1VvqZwnLK3/fNyz1K+f1kQZ0Miks= =YeBp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --cYtjc4pxslFTELvY-- From nobody Wed Dec 1 21:55:18 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B14A18BB6C8 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2021 22:00:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from news@mips.inka.de) Received: from mail.inka.de (mail.inka.de [IPv6:2a04:c9c7:0:1073:217:a4ff:fe3b:e77c]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4J4Cgf6HKWz3lnH for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2021 22:00:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from news@mips.inka.de) Received: from mips.inka.de (news@[127.0.0.1]) by mail.inka.de with uucp (rmailwrap 0.5) id 1msXe2-00EeDn-5h; Wed, 01 Dec 2021 23:00:06 +0100 Received: from lorvorc.mips.inka.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lorvorc.mips.inka.de (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTP id 1B1LtIoU085397 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2021 22:55:18 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from news@lorvorc.mips.inka.de) Received: (from news@localhost) by lorvorc.mips.inka.de (8.16.1/8.16.1/Submit) id 1B1LtIIh085396 for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Wed, 1 Dec 2021 22:55:18 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from news) To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: Christian Weisgerber Newsgroups: list.freebsd.ports Subject: Re: Unable to build Python38 ports like devel/py38-pycparser and even py38-setuptools Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2021 21:55:18 -0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <4aabecf116ce10431b21aba202a47a48004f252e.camel@uos.de> User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (FreeBSD) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4J4Cgf6HKWz3lnH X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of news@mips.inka.de has no SPF policy when checking 2a04:c9c7:0:1073:217:a4ff:fe3b:e77c) smtp.mailfrom=news@mips.inka.de X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.19 / 15.00]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FREEFALL_USER(0.00)[news]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROMTLD(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.61)[0.610]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[inka.de]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[naddy@mips.inka.de,news@mips.inka.de]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:202113, ipnet:2a04:c9c0::/29, country:DE]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[naddy@mips.inka.de,news@mips.inka.de] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org On 2021-11-28, Kevin Oberman wrote: > If I remember correctly, the fix is to de-install both py38-packaging and > py38-setuptools. >> pkg delete -f py38-setuptools >> pkg delete -f py38-packaging >> portmaster devel/pkg-packaging >> portmaster devel/py-setuptools I'm stuck in the same catch-22 and this doesn't work. I can't install py-packaging because it depends on py-setuptools. py-setuptools can't be installed because it seems to require py-packaging: File "/extra/obj/usr/ports/devel/py-setuptools/work-py38/setuptools-57.0.0/pkg_resources/__init__.py", line 772, in resolve raise DistributionNotFound(req, requirers) pkg_resources.DistributionNotFound: The 'packaging>=20.0' distribution was not found and is required by the application *** Error code 1 -- Christian "naddy" Weisgerber naddy@mips.inka.de From nobody Wed Dec 1 22:56:10 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D46218B7C76 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2021 22:56:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from monochrome@twcny.rr.com) Received: from p-impout005.msg.pkvw.co.charter.net (p-impout005aa.msg.pkvw.co.charter.net [47.43.26.136]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "Client", Issuer "CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4J4DwK6jTHz4dwD for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2021 22:56:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from monochrome@twcny.rr.com) Received: from [192.168.13.11] ([45.47.47.175]) by cmsmtp with ESMTP id sYWImNe3vM0uWsYWJmXKnB; Wed, 01 Dec 2021 22:56:11 +0000 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.4 cv=AY2iolbG c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=61a7fd8b a=mphbu5Yzuc0DywumphXwrA==:117 a=mphbu5Yzuc0DywumphXwrA==:17 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=pGLkceISAAAA:8 a=jgUVhgzUCqLmEcvRSfYA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=IjZwj45LgO3ly-622nXo:22 Message-ID: Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2021 17:56:10 -0500 List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.4.0 Subject: Re: Unable to build Python38 ports like devel/py38-pycparser and even py38-setuptools Content-Language: en-US To: Christian Weisgerber , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <4aabecf116ce10431b21aba202a47a48004f252e.camel@uos.de> From: monochrome In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4xfOECyGjPL5p4at1r2RISCnYEDYFnpqrmOByKjf1sEMgHT/tWnFqen3hEOYEUKIhm9eA2IMMh4W1W6wWz+kBNOC+/Hqy+gE1NouFfKoPH+IeQxB32JmDX P0QdbH8M17/gOLvE8PvqziipkcHqDhsfe6jFe8f4MLD3d1xnH4N8+iHZ3QTGAFAAZtYhETvjeFse9LP4k+77biV+yF7QXeQGGXrwKQJeAGYZKf+arKjF8OVW X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4J4DwK6jTHz4dwD X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=259981 I guess the "fix" is to install one or more from within the ports tree and not using portmaster On 12/1/21 16:55, Christian Weisgerber wrote: > On 2021-11-28, Kevin Oberman wrote: > >> If I remember correctly, the fix is to de-install both py38-packaging and >> py38-setuptools. >>> pkg delete -f py38-setuptools >>> pkg delete -f py38-packaging >>> portmaster devel/pkg-packaging >>> portmaster devel/py-setuptools > > I'm stuck in the same catch-22 and this doesn't work. > > I can't install py-packaging because it depends on py-setuptools. > py-setuptools can't be installed because it seems to require > py-packaging: > > File "/extra/obj/usr/ports/devel/py-setuptools/work-py38/setuptools-57.0.0/pkg_resources/__init__.py", line 772, in resolve > raise DistributionNotFound(req, requirers) > pkg_resources.DistributionNotFound: The 'packaging>=20.0' distribution was not found and is required by the application > *** Error code 1 > From nobody Wed Dec 1 23:15:54 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D4E118C15AC for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2021 23:16:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from koobs.freebsd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pl1-x633.google.com (mail-pl1-x633.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::633]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1D4" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4J4FMB14gGz4lkZ; Wed, 1 Dec 2021 23:16:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from koobs.freebsd@gmail.com) Received: by mail-pl1-x633.google.com with SMTP id u17so18869392plg.9; Wed, 01 Dec 2021 15:16:06 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=sender:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:reply-to:subject :content-language:to:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Z2QGoA3ktR4orW3H0F7CVJrpgJVRHcpTGaDXw7jeNC0=; b=PA2iukxs4CKiskG3eQzRSHLdWrf4m0PX2A7WU5PBthWuOMBylUvjmhEH5Z+uo38Jxa o9zNcG1MmYTBxl+eeClkMDraQ3m1cme7c/IIfFn7jUZDSFJ3wKBEAMnmZQxPkGN8WmmE cyS3kN2mhT8fSqvx5R4mivvg8ikC9JEfHt11HTOo3igW4JBmxmoqJWGOYTG1eY0FP6Cx +R9/FCGMUdj/68xvBlqp9mRhZbPPvrb81ziRNcC8+kTxtVVKxDFAdF/dtCfhA+748psN 2NgACz/VplspbNJuh6Cca+BHqTlW/3sQyItnlIDv00dDM/WlFAy2+kGywyNygpGXgiiJ jKgQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent :reply-to:subject:content-language:to:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Z2QGoA3ktR4orW3H0F7CVJrpgJVRHcpTGaDXw7jeNC0=; b=WC/3G09RXpYChMEQKHpU3wED0g61EJh357BHOmrPPE2/p+fqsvzwj8u7nFa1760yn2 a6RczdmVQ7UZJBgDJepmW2zaOAYBZglf+aAAxqBR4iHL5deCUA591WjZUZbKRmx6aDiL mgI+XMHis6Ggce4hnA3Z95us4YPzxrw2HlHqNgWE1SMZiAnmaRRrz9k/FIIZNNINRaLg J4YDi6dggT/I9bQL2TMG+9HtmvV8I8MPfLDK1qbDMAgc3mEGxYHuIwgLyIb+8N0bQQPU yXG1N+soxDf4YP4vQOJ22YebI4QQ63cOM66Vnv0Bf0hH+kKhFVT8CcSRw0cE0eV9bCcj 6wmQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533O74REOZlNY46i5MnqCeMviLXSfNFzfr26ZAILP35o4IM8fbIE +EZRPhtaV/65/2jqtNcbiq0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxNdKtzn1yhmC9DzrbjUq+G39Iiko2mTpfH0ESml50luL8CHQVzGOMdKTsyqwkRqqQHnQISPQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:4c0d:: with SMTP id na13mr1558981pjb.177.1638400558782; Wed, 01 Dec 2021 15:15:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPV6:2403:5807:1b:1:985c:8d34:2719:1336? (2403-5807-1b-1-985c-8d34-2719-1336.ip6.aussiebb.net. [2403:5807:1b:1:985c:8d34:2719:1336]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u22sm905812pfk.148.2021.12.01.15.15.56 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 01 Dec 2021 15:15:58 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2021 10:15:54 +1100 List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:96.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/96.0a1 Reply-To: koobs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Unable to build Python38 ports like devel/py38-pycparser and even py38-setuptools Content-Language: en-US To: monochrome , Christian Weisgerber , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Kai Knoblich References: <4aabecf116ce10431b21aba202a47a48004f252e.camel@uos.de> From: Kubilay Kocak In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4J4FMB14gGz4lkZ X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N On 2/12/2021 9:56 am, monochrome wrote: > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=259981 > > I guess the "fix" is to install one or more from within the ports tree > and not using portmaster > > > > On 12/1/21 16:55, Christian Weisgerber wrote: >> On 2021-11-28, Kevin Oberman wrote: >> >>> If I remember correctly, the fix is to de-install both py38-packaging >>> and >>> py38-setuptools. >>>> pkg delete -f py38-setuptools >>>> pkg delete -f py38-packaging >>>> portmaster devel/pkg-packaging >>>> portmaster devel/py-setuptools >> >> I'm stuck in the same catch-22 and this doesn't work. >> >> I can't install py-packaging because it depends on py-setuptools. >> py-setuptools can't be installed because it seems to require >> py-packaging: >> >>    File >> "/extra/obj/usr/ports/devel/py-setuptools/work-py38/setuptools-57.0.0/pkg_resources/__init__.py", line 772, in resolve >>      raise DistributionNotFound(req, requirers) >> pkg_resources.DistributionNotFound: The 'packaging>=20.0' distribution >> was not found and is required by the application >> *** Error code 1 >> > Note also: There is an outstanding missing build_depends on packaging for setuptools_scm which may be responsible for a subset of these cases. I'm not confident in the assessment of portmaster being the root cause over incorrectly declared or scoped dependency sets. From nobody Thu Dec 2 00:14:27 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4278B18B2AC0 for ; Thu, 2 Dec 2021 00:15:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from naddy@mips.inka.de) Received: from mail.inka.de (mail.inka.de [IPv6:2a04:c9c7:0:1073:217:a4ff:fe3b:e77c]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4J4GgH74Q3z3HkY for ; Thu, 2 Dec 2021 00:15:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from naddy@mips.inka.de) Received: from mips.inka.de (naddy@[127.0.0.1]) by mail.inka.de with uucp (rmailwrap 0.5) id 1msZkf-00EhJS-ML; Thu, 02 Dec 2021 01:15:05 +0100 Received: from lorvorc.mips.inka.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lorvorc.mips.inka.de (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTP id 1B20ERg4099429; Thu, 2 Dec 2021 01:14:27 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from naddy@lorvorc.mips.inka.de) Received: (from naddy@localhost) by lorvorc.mips.inka.de (8.16.1/8.16.1/Submit) id 1B20EREE099428; Thu, 2 Dec 2021 01:14:27 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from naddy) Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2021 01:14:27 +0100 From: Christian Weisgerber To: monochrome Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Unable to build Python38 ports like devel/py38-pycparser and even py38-setuptools Message-ID: References: <4aabecf116ce10431b21aba202a47a48004f252e.camel@uos.de> List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4J4GgH74Q3z3HkY X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N monochrome: > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=259981 > > I guess the "fix" is to install one or more from within the ports tree and > not using portmaster No. py-packaging still has a BUILD_DEPENDS on py-setuptools, so the ports build will recurse there. Any py-setuptools still dies with the same error. The crucial fix was to also deinstall py-setuptools_scm. -- Christian "naddy" Weisgerber naddy@mips.inka.de From nobody Thu Dec 2 10:32:09 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A914618CBD24; Thu, 2 Dec 2021 10:32:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from junchoon@dec.sakura.ne.jp) Received: from www121.sakura.ne.jp (www121.sakura.ne.jp [153.125.133.21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4J4XMS0XGTz54cK; Thu, 2 Dec 2021 10:32:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from junchoon@dec.sakura.ne.jp) Received: from kalamity.joker.local (123-48-130-181.area1b.commufa.jp [123.48.130.181]) (authenticated bits=0) by www121.sakura.ne.jp (8.16.1/8.16.1/[SAKURA-WEB]/20201212) with ESMTPA id 1B2AWAgk098716; Thu, 2 Dec 2021 19:32:10 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from junchoon@dec.sakura.ne.jp) Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2021 19:32:09 +0900 From: Tomoaki AOKI To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Brooks Davis Subject: Re: Problem compiling ports Message-Id: <20211202193209.67b8696b5a74803b99ad8190@dec.sakura.ne.jp> In-Reply-To: <20211130224537.GE75149@spindle.one-eyed-alien.net> References: <28612702.6783053.1638293085302.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <28612702.6783053.1638293085302@mail.yahoo.com> <20211130174530.GA75149@spindle.one-eyed-alien.net> <20211201065756.b8d50b150a88b0181f24ad89@dec.sakura.ne.jp> <20211130224537.GE75149@spindle.one-eyed-alien.net> Organization: Junchoon corps X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.33; amd64-portbld-freebsd13.0) List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-2022-JP Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4J4XMS0XGTz54cK X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of junchoon@dec.sakura.ne.jp has no SPF policy when checking 153.125.133.21) smtp.mailfrom=junchoon@dec.sakura.ne.jp X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.67 / 15.00]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[sakura.ne.jp]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; HAS_ORG_HEADER(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.89)[-0.893]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.27)[-0.265]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.91)[-0.914]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7684, ipnet:153.125.128.0/18, country:JP]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[123.48.130.181:received] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N Confirmed. Thanks for your quick reaction! On Tue, 30 Nov 2021 22:45:37 +0000 Brooks Davis wrote: > Yeah, I've got this in progress. > > -- Brooks > > On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 06:57:56AM +0900, Tomoaki AOKI wrote: > > It would be better making new special handling like BE_AMDGPU for it. > > Building with BE_STANDARD just for this would be a pain for some users. > > > > (CC'ing freebsd-ports ML.) > > > > > > On Tue, 30 Nov 2021 17:45:30 +0000 > > Brooks Davis wrote: > > > > > In the config for devel/llvm11, is BE_STANDARD enabled? If not, you > > > won't have the web assembly backend. > > > > > > -- Brooks > > > > > > On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 05:24:45PM +0000, Filippo Moretti via current wrote: > > > > error: unable to create target: 'No available targets are compatible with triple "wasm32-unknown-wasi"' > > > > 1 error generated. > > > > gmake[3]: *** [Makefile:380: /usr/ports/devel/wasi-libc/work/wasi-libc-ad5133410f66b93a2381db5b542aad5e0964db96/build/dlmalloc/src/dlmalloc.o] Error 1 > > > > error: unable to create target: 'No available targets are compatible with triple "wasm32-unknown-wasi"' > > > > 1 error generated. > > > > gmake[3]: *** [Makefile:440: startup_files] Error 1 > > > > gmake[3]: Leaving directory '/usr/ports/devel/wasi-libc/work/wasi-libc-ad5133410f66b93a2381db5b542aad5e0964db96' > > > > ===> Compilation failed unexpectedly. > > > > Try to set MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE=yes and rebuild before reporting the failure to > > > > the maintainer. > > > > *** Error code 1 > > > > > > > > Stop. > > > > make[2]: stopped in /usr/ports/devel/wasi-libc > > > > *** Error code 1 > > > > > > > > Stop. > > > > make[1]: stopped in /usr/ports/devel/wasi-libcxx*** Error code 1 > > > > > > > > Stop. > > > > make: stopped in /usr/ports/www/firefox > > > > > > > > ===>>> make build failed for www/firefox > > > > ===>>> Aborting update > > > > > > > > > > > > ??File "/usr/local/lib/python3.8/site-packages/setuptools/dist.py", line 799, in > > > > ?????? eps = map(lambda e: e.load(), pkg_resources.iter_entry_points(group)) > > > > ?? File "/usr/local/lib/python3.8/site-packages/pkg_resources/__init__.py", line 2449, in load > > > > ?????? self.require(*args, **kwargs) > > > > ?? File "/usr/local/lib/python3.8/site-packages/pkg_resources/__init__.py", line 2472, in require > > > > ?????? items = working_set.resolve(reqs, env, installer, extras=self.extras) > > > > ?? File "/usr/local/lib/python3.8/site-packages/pkg_resources/__init__.py", line 772, in resolve > > > > ?????? raise DistributionNotFound(req, requirers) > > > > pkg_resources.DistributionNotFound: The 'packaging>=20.0' distribution was not found and is required by the application > > > > *** Error code 1 > > > > > > > > Stop. > > > > make: stopped in /usr/ports/devel/py-pycparser > > > > > > > > ===>>> make build failed for devel/py-pycparser@py38 > > > > ===>>> Aborting update > > > > > > > > FreeBSD sting 14.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 14.0-CURRENT #62 heads/main-n251146-d109559ddbf: Mon Nov 29 12:18:48 CET 2021???????? root@sting:/usr/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/sys/STING?? amd64 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Tomoaki AOKI > > -- $B@DLZ(B $BCNL@(B [Tomoaki AOKI] From nobody Thu Dec 2 14:24:51 2021 X-Original-To: ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B98BA18C5D37 for ; Thu, 2 Dec 2021 14:25:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pvoigt@uos.de) Received: from mta-out-1-1.rz.uni-osnabrueck.de (mta-out-1-1.rz.uni-osnabrueck.de [IPv6:2001:638:508:100::83ad:1294]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4J4dXR6f8xz3CM3 for ; Thu, 2 Dec 2021 14:25:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pvoigt@uos.de) Received: from vm412.rz.uni-osnabrueck.de (vm412.rz.uni-osnabrueck.de [131.173.17.0]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mta-out-1-1.rz.uni-osnabrueck.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2FC46E886D for ; Thu, 2 Dec 2021 15:25:18 +0100 (CET) Received: from spock.drpetervoigt.eu (spock.drpetervoigt.eu [217.91.107.36]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: pvoigt) by vm412.rz.uni-osnabrueck.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B46621729DCC for ; Thu, 2 Dec 2021 15:24:57 +0100 (CET) Received: from kirk.drpetervoigt.private (kirk.drpetervoigt.private [192.168.1.60]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: pvoigt) by spock.drpetervoigt.eu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7FC7E6D346 for ; Thu, 2 Dec 2021 15:24:51 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <9579b15c9de7458728c7b7b130495af3a48a9b11.camel@uos.de> Subject: Re: Unable to build Python38 ports like devel/py38-pycparser and even py38-setuptools From: "Dr. Peter Voigt" To: ports@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2021 15:24:51 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: <4aabecf116ce10431b21aba202a47a48004f252e.camel@uos.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.38.3-1 List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-PMX-Version: vm412.rz.uni-osnabrueck.de (Univ. Osnabrueck) with PMX 6.4.6.2792898, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.2107409, Antispam-Data: 2021.12.2.141516, AntiVirus-Engine: 5.87.0, AntiVirus-Data: 2021.12.2.5870001 X-PMX-Spam: Gauge=X, Probability=10%, Report= TO_IN_SUBJECT 0.5, HTML_00_01 0.05, HTML_00_10 0.05, BODYTEXTP_SIZE_3000_LESS 0, BODYTEXTP_SIZE_400_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_1000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_2000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_200_299 0, BODY_SIZE_5000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_7000_LESS 0, CT_TEXT_PLAIN_UTF8_CAPS 0, FROM_NAME_PHRASE 0, IN_REP_TO 0, MSG_THREAD 0, NO_FUR_HEADER 0, REFERENCES 0, SINGLE_URI_IN_BODY 0, SMALL_BODY 0, URI_WITH_PATH_ONLY 0, __ANY_URI 0, __BODY_NO_MAILTO 0, __BOUNCE_CHALLENGE_SUBJ 0, __BOUNCE_NDR_SUBJ_EXEMPT 0, __CP_URI_IN_BODY 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __FORWARDED_MSG 0, __FROM_DOMAIN_NOT_IN_BODY 0, __FROM_NAME_NOT_IN_BODY 0, __HAS_FROM 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __HAS_REFERENCES 0, __HEADER_ORDER_FROM 0, __HTTPS_URI 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __MAIL_CHAIN 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_TEXT_P 0, __MIME_TEXT_P1 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __NO_HTML_TAG_RAW 0, __PHISH_SPEAR_SUBJ_PREDICATE 0, __REFERENCES 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __SINGLE_URI_TEXT 0, __SUBJ_ALPHA_END 0, __SUBJ_ALPHA_NEGATE 0, __SUBJ_REPLY 0, __TO_IN_SUBJECT 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __TO_NO_NAME 0, __URI_IN_BODY 0, __URI_NOT_IMG 0, __URI_NO_MAILTO 0, __URI_NO_WWW 0, __URI_WITH_PATH 0, __USER_AGENT 0 X-PMX-Spam-Level: X X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4J4dXR6f8xz3CM3 X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of pvoigt@uos.de designates 2001:638:508:100::83ad:1294 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=pvoigt@uos.de X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.50 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2001:638:508:100::/64]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[ports@freebsd.org]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.80)[0.797]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[uos.de]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED(-0.20)[131.173.17.0:received]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.20)[0.196]; FROM_NAME_HAS_TITLE(1.00)[dr]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-0.997]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:680, ipnet:2001:638::/32, country:DE]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N That's exactly what I described above and what worked for me. On Wed, 2021-12-01 at 17:56 -0500, monochrome wrote: > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=259981 > > I guess the "fix" is to install one or more from within the ports > tree > and not using portmaster > From nobody Thu Dec 2 16:00:00 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D8B218C780C for ; Thu, 2 Dec 2021 16:00:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from soth.netfence.it (mailserver.netfence.it [78.134.96.152]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mailserver.netfence.it", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4J4gdm1bvpz3sfy; Thu, 2 Dec 2021 16:00:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from [10.1.2.18] (mailserver.netfence.it [78.134.96.152]) (authenticated bits=0) by soth.netfence.it (8.17.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPSA id 1B2G00NA022954 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 2 Dec 2021 17:00:01 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) X-Authentication-Warning: soth.netfence.it: Host mailserver.netfence.it [78.134.96.152] claimed to be [10.1.2.18] Message-ID: <2c27f019-2499-59c9-35ef-2dc728a547be@netfence.it> Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2021 17:00:00 +0100 List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.3.2 Subject: Re: Bacula and S3 Content-Language: en-US To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Cc: dvl@FreeBSD.org References: From: Andrea Venturoli In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4J4gdm1bvpz3sfy X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=netfence.it; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of ml@netfence.it designates 78.134.96.152 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=ml@netfence.it X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.63 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.99)[-0.995]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:78.134.96.152]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; HAS_XAW(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-0.999]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.83)[-0.835]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[netfence.it,none]; RCVD_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:35612, ipnet:78.134.0.0/17, country:IT]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[] X-Spam: Yes X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N On 9/21/21 17:41, Dan Langille wrote: >> I've made a separate port for libs3 and added an option to >> bacula11-server (which will depend on the former). >> >> Unfortunately I'm still far from being able to test this properly. > ... > Please create a PR and attach a patch. I've put this in production and currently keeping an eye on it, but it seems to work. https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=260170 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=260171 bye & Thanks av.