From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Jul 26 12:59:25 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C7AD66BD87 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2021 12:59:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gray@nxg.name) Received: from smtp99.ord1c.emailsrvr.com (smtp99.ord1c.emailsrvr.com [108.166.43.99]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4GYKkh3sZ2z4Sfb for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2021 12:59:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gray@nxg.name) X-Auth-ID: gray@nxg.name Received: by smtp13.relay.ord1c.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: gray-AT-nxg.name) with ESMTPSA id BE9A7A0158; Mon, 26 Jul 2021 08:59:16 -0400 (EDT) From: Norman Gray To: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Detecting or mitigating syn-flood attacks Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2021 13:59:14 +0100 X-Mailer: MailMate (1.14r5769) Message-ID: <57893A91-2180-441F-836F-66EAC526FBB8@nxg.name> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Classification-ID: f54f84af-2f4f-4de1-adea-ac2580ded647-1-1 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4GYKkh3sZ2z4Sfb X-Spamd-Bar: +++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of gray@nxg.name designates 108.166.43.99 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=gray@nxg.name X-Spamd-Result: default: False [3.20 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_VERYGOOD(0.00)[108.166.43.99:from]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_MISSING_CHARSET(2.50)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:108.166.43.0/24]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[nxg.name]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[108.166.43.99:from]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(1.00)[1.000]; RCVD_COUNT_ZERO(0.00)[0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:19994, ipnet:108.166.0.0/18, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2021 12:59:25 -0000 Greetings. Can anyone point me towards best-practice guidance on detecting and = mitigating syn-flood attacks, with a focus on FreeBSD? We run a login server, providing ssh access to our users, from the open = internet. It's running in a jail on a FreeBSD machine. This machine = (both jail and host) has recently become unresponsive on occasion, even = to the extent of it being impossible to log in on the console (the = password prompt never appears). Nothing in the logs. We _think_ we are = (or have been) victim to a syn-flood attack, but mostly on the grounds = of having ruled out most plausible alternatives: we're struggling to = find positive confirmation of this. So I have two related questions: 1. What should we be looking at, to confirm or refute this hypothesis? = And, supposing that the attack has stopped when we're looking, what = should we be monitoring to detect such a thing if it comes back? 2. Is there a best practice document that we should be working through? = The machine is in a jail, with firewall rules which are, I _think_, as = restrictive as is compatible with the service's purpose of having port = 22 open to the internet. A few extra observations: I thought I'd be able to find all sorts of information and guidance on = this, but my google-fu seems lacking. Regarding the sshd configuration, = makes a = few points, which we're already observing. The machine's sshd_config is = pretty restrictive: I'm reasonably comfortable I understand the = important parts of the sshd configuration, but there's always more to = learn. In any case, my own uncertainty is more with the pf = configuration than the sshd one. I see for example = , = but that's rather terse, and now 10 years old. There are of course various 'top 20 ssh best practices !1!!' documents = here and there, but their recommendations, while not necessarily wrong, = tend to be rather voodoo, which doesn't make me trust them much. I'm comfortable with basic pf configuration, but I haven't so far had to = venture very far off-shore. I'm reluctant to type in firewall rules I = don't understand (*cough*). I'm also using blacklistd on the jail host, with all its eccentricities. Best wishes, Norman -- = Norman Gray : https://nxg.me.uk From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Jul 26 13:36:50 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12D1066C5F1 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2021 13:36:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@qeng-ho.org) Received: from mailout.qeng-ho.org (mailout.qeng-ho.org [217.155.128.244]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4GYLYs02SMz4bVl for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2021 13:36:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@qeng-ho.org) Received: from arthur.home.qeng-ho.org (unknown [IPv6:2a02:8010:64c9:1::2]) by mailout.qeng-ho.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4D2D50D9C; Mon, 26 Jul 2021 14:36:32 +0100 (BST) Subject: Re: Detecting or mitigating syn-flood attacks To: Norman Gray , FreeBSD Questions References: <57893A91-2180-441F-836F-66EAC526FBB8@nxg.name> From: Arthur Chance Message-ID: Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2021 14:36:32 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <57893A91-2180-441F-836F-66EAC526FBB8@nxg.name> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4GYLYs02SMz4bVl X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of freebsd@qeng-ho.org designates 217.155.128.244 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=freebsd@qeng-ho.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.70 / 15.00]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:217.155.128.240/29]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(1.00)[1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[qeng-ho.org]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:13037, ipnet:217.155.0.0/16, country:GB]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2021 13:36:50 -0000 On 26/07/2021 13:59, Norman Gray wrote: > > Greetings. > > Can anyone point me towards best-practice guidance on detecting and > mitigating syn-flood attacks, with a focus on FreeBSD? > > We run a login server, providing ssh access to our users, from the open > internet.   It's running in a jail on a FreeBSD machine.  This machine > (both jail and host) has recently become unresponsive on occasion, even > to the extent of it being impossible to log in on the console (the > password prompt never appears).  Nothing in the logs.  We _think_ we are > (or have been) victim to a syn-flood attack, but mostly on the grounds > of having ruled out most plausible alternatives: we're struggling to > find positive confirmation of this. > > So I have two related questions: > > 1. What should we be looking at, to confirm or refute this hypothesis?  > And, supposing that the attack has stopped when we're looking, what > should we be monitoring to detect such a thing if it comes back? This is theoretical, I have no personal experience, but you might want to look at the net.inet.tcp.syncache MIB tree. sysctl -d net.inet.tcp.syncache for quick descriptions. net.inet.tcp.syncache.count would seem to be the first thing to watch, and tweaking net.inet.tcp.syncache.cachelimit or net.inet.tcp.syncookies_only might help, but I'd wait until someone more knowledgable than me chips in. > 2. Is there a best practice document that we should be working through?  > The machine is in a jail, with firewall rules which are, I _think_, as > restrictive as is compatible with the service's purpose of having port > 22 open to the internet. > > A few extra observations: > > I thought I'd be able to find all sorts of information and guidance on > this, but my google-fu seems lacking. > > Regarding the sshd configuration, > makes a > few points, which we're already observing.  The machine's sshd_config is > pretty restrictive: I'm reasonably comfortable I understand the > important parts of the sshd configuration, but there's always more to > learn.  In any case, my own uncertainty is more with the pf > configuration than the sshd one. > > I see for example > , > but that's rather terse, and now 10 years old. > > There are of course various 'top 20 ssh best practices !1!!' documents > here and there, but their recommendations, while not necessarily wrong, > tend to be rather voodoo, which doesn't make me trust them much. > > I'm comfortable with basic pf configuration, but I haven't so far had to > venture very far off-shore.  I'm reluctant to type in firewall rules I > don't understand (*cough*). > > I'm also using blacklistd on the jail host, with all its eccentricities -- Nothing teaches one not to try to stamp out burning thermite quite like real-life experience. — James Davis Nicoll From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Jul 26 13:42:56 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 388E166CCB5 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2021 13:42:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 4250.82.1d4d2000a921678.90a34611a9beabdd739eabcca96d80dd@email-od.com) Received: from s1-b0c6.socketlabs.email-od.com (s1-b0c6.socketlabs.email-od.com [142.0.176.198]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4GYLhv0Fgxz4cGv for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2021 13:42:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 4250.82.1d4d2000a921678.90a34611a9beabdd739eabcca96d80dd@email-od.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=email-od.com;i=@email-od.com;s=dkim; c=relaxed/relaxed; q=dns/txt; t=1627306975; x=1629898975; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:x-thread-info; bh=zHYwTQhRxeSDOvCfFySB8tX91Y0hiuqICL0Z9MQIbkI=; b=Ragb4cd3qoyqCV0qez3+ZBIZo3g1jxk4yZBh/8srHfLOs5p/mV5A6rpWkCHu25p74zlASO0GWCQYUFozmGSsowSDZqaYIsw5F8z5c4fNzIgJusL8lNGEdyHlXgIVRwR7/WZ8Ev36x6VNrr/m8bny9Udq5uwF08+JiWjlnMtDmx4= X-Thread-Info: NDI1MC4xMi4xZDRkMjAwMGE5MjE2NzguZnJlZWJzZC1xdWVzdGlvbnM9ZnJlZWJzZC5vcmc= Received: from r1.us-east-2.aws.in.socketlabs.com (r1.us-east-2.aws.in.socketlabs.com [142.0.189.1]) by mxsg2.email-od.com with ESMTP(version=Tls12 cipher=Aes256 bits=256); Mon, 26 Jul 2021 09:42:41 -0400 Received: from smtp.lan.sohara.org (EMTPY [185.202.17.215]) by r1.us-east-2.aws.in.socketlabs.com with ESMTP(version=Tls12 cipher=Aes256 bits=256); Mon, 26 Jul 2021 09:42:40 -0400 Received: from [192.168.63.1] (helo=steve.lan.sohara.org) by smtp.lan.sohara.org with smtp (Exim 4.94 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1m80sR-000CpO-Kk; Mon, 26 Jul 2021 14:42:38 +0100 Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2021 14:42:38 +0100 From: Steve O'Hara-Smith To: Norman Gray Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Detecting or mitigating syn-flood attacks Message-Id: <20210726144238.2245630e959724dc1df1794e@sohara.org> In-Reply-To: <57893A91-2180-441F-836F-66EAC526FBB8@nxg.name> References: <57893A91-2180-441F-836F-66EAC526FBB8@nxg.name> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.33; amd64-portbld-freebsd12.1) X-Clacks-Overhead: "GNU Terry Pratchett" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4GYLhv0Fgxz4cGv X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=email-od.com header.s=dkim header.b=Ragb4cd3; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of 4250.82.1d4d2000a921678.90a34611a9beabdd739eabcca96d80dd@email-od.com designates 142.0.176.198 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=4250.82.1d4d2000a921678.90a34611a9beabdd739eabcca96d80dd@email-od.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.68 / 15.00]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[email-od.com:s=dkim]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:142.0.176.0/20]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[sohara.org]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[email-od.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[142.0.189.1:received]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.98)[-0.982]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[steve@sohara.org,4250.82.1d4d2000a921678.90a34611a9beabdd739eabcca96d80dd@email-od.com]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7381, ipnet:142.0.176.0/22, country:US]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[steve@sohara.org,4250.82.1d4d2000a921678.90a34611a9beabdd739eabcca96d80dd@email-od.com]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[email-od.com:dkim] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2021 13:42:56 -0000 On Mon, 26 Jul 2021 13:59:14 +0100 Norman Gray wrote: > > Greetings. > > Can anyone point me towards best-practice guidance on detecting and > mitigating syn-flood attacks, with a focus on FreeBSD? There's a paper on using syncache for the purpose: https://users.ece.cmu.edu/~adrian/731-sp05/readings/lemon-syn-cache.pdf I also see mentions of syncookies in related questions. -- Steve O'Hara-Smith From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Jul 26 20:00:21 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2369967403F for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2021 20:00:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gray@nxg.name) Received: from smtp93.ord1c.emailsrvr.com (smtp93.ord1c.emailsrvr.com [108.166.43.93]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4GYW4N102Fz3sfB for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2021 20:00:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gray@nxg.name) X-Auth-ID: gray@nxg.name Received: by smtp20.relay.ord1c.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: gray-AT-nxg.name) with ESMTPSA id C299DE018A; Mon, 26 Jul 2021 16:00:11 -0400 (EDT) From: Norman Gray To: "Steve O'Hara-Smith" , Arthur Chance Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Detecting or mitigating syn-flood attacks Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2021 21:00:10 +0100 X-Mailer: MailMate (1.14r5769) Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20210726144238.2245630e959724dc1df1794e@sohara.org> References: <57893A91-2180-441F-836F-66EAC526FBB8@nxg.name> <20210726144238.2245630e959724dc1df1794e@sohara.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed X-Classification-ID: 7093d46d-9735-47d6-b5bf-014781d385fa-1-1 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4GYW4N102Fz3sfB X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of gray@nxg.name designates 108.166.43.93 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=gray@nxg.name X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.14 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.54)[-0.540]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:108.166.43.0/24]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.98)[0.983]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[nxg.name]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_GOOD(0.00)[108.166.43.93:from]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[108.166.43.93:from]; RCVD_COUNT_ZERO(0.00)[0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:19994, ipnet:108.166.0.0/18, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2021 20:00:21 -0000 Arthur and Steve, hello. On 26 Jul 2021, at 14:42, Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote: > There's a paper on using syncache for the purpose: Many thanks, both. I'll read through that paper carefully, and see if, following Arthur's suggestion, there's a way of including net.inet.tcp.syncache.count in our monitoring (in particular to try to work out what value of 'count' counts as 'a lot'). I'll try to remember to report back here. Best wishes, Norman -- Norman Gray : https://nxg.me.uk From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Jul 28 07:02:47 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECAF26531D3 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 07:02:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from meetshamsher@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pj1-x102e.google.com (mail-pj1-x102e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::102e]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4GZPkG5qbjz4Vnd for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 07:02:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from meetshamsher@gmail.com) Received: by mail-pj1-x102e.google.com with SMTP id m10-20020a17090a34cab0290176b52c60ddso2788694pjf.4 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 00:02:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:mime-version:subject:message-id:date:to; bh=iDkWX2uAn6B5MjJ3udAH+QCRAuQ6DVu48Qgd72kPTmI=; b=c0giol2FqX0MNMblYUzkJxXKsX2cx4VKeXrsPewcbGwJLwJJ6K+3eJ5zuE/wTHO5cW jaq0Lzriyspvs+PR8btXsoBcbm4MqrqN+aWGY3weLD0xYRQtPxZxAixLSe4J+ATpjin9 +IrZBROAOPdF+HNfuNeo5EZwVhKF7wJH83tdtEWKlOBLcICXvTjtGc4u7uRId+6A3ZEK Gv0NtTK9ZKCIQI48nisqxdywVFnp7OVsbMifmVIdztm0B1jczLDOh1RyWVO7U7WeY8qc 6RzSw6jxf5m/XXWYmokq5F4SJt7xz3cLSYa7LtldlNTgR2d2JPrxz/9lzkMp4PQwQPdQ Syyg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:mime-version:subject:message-id:date:to; bh=iDkWX2uAn6B5MjJ3udAH+QCRAuQ6DVu48Qgd72kPTmI=; b=DfiQKrJNB+208IqYZapzTFE8did8hpiMmgvotmdgrwEX8PuixQ8956LIGF8QOhSk8y Fg7q9qMlel/hlDfmz3WTCRvo+nq5E00+FmuaEMcnsv4Nq37B4qXzWhyE92dfK9AL4bI+ PKbMKCxlL2OEYN1rfhomiUBuLb0XgW4wqccDqFJMOeygrXS3v4pQhget43rJpiM6QQQl cuJslb8NSd/DZMxqBl9MNaLAJW9p+9rX3qHAQ2/MmjUl4AwfdepTLtvh4X1YLOQTZjBZ BZ12+loqrv+tMRsE0MMiwSwpKXiIjkrQJweERFq01PQXHXb1ymxay0PrDeLW/XVLxx88 y8dg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531qbDykC1QZNou0x1prcMSf35o1n3/AgXE0x9Bt9wq9YVtXRJoT l/ktXpzscqArmN7nR9oVniRgqM/mEXE= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwmY6oN5AomiEMLJYClaFyO/YpwlhV5GOvc78FvX6qjJDrtsxz1RgeRxDue/lrvVEX+gtiGSw== X-Received: by 2002:a65:4242:: with SMTP id d2mr27291983pgq.243.1627455759446; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 00:02:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2001:420:c0e0:1003::353? ([2001:420:c0e0:1003::353]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g4sm6860889pgn.45.2021.07.28.00.02.38 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 28 Jul 2021 00:02:38 -0700 (PDT) From: Shamsher singh Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.7\)) Subject: Regarding MALLOC_DEFINE related issues in kernel code usage Message-Id: Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2021 12:32:36 +0530 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.7) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4GZPkG5qbjz4Vnd X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=c0giol2F; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of meetshamsher@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::102e as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=meetshamsher@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.50 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36:c]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::102e:from]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(1.00)[0.999]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com:dkim] X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 28 Jul 2021 08:05:56 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.34 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2021 07:02:48 -0000 Hi, I am using below test.c file (shown as example) in freebsd13 and getting = below issues: For #include and #include # cat test.c=20 #define _KERNEL #include #include #include =20 #include =20 #include #include #include #include #include =20 #include #include #include MALLOC_DEFINE(M_NODE, "NODE1", "test Node"); int main() { int *ptr; ptr =3D (int*)malloc(sizeof(int), M_NODE ,M_WAITOK) printf("ptr=3D%p\n",ptr); return 0; } [root@FreeBSD_build_machine1 ~/iproot/freebsd/mods/drivers/dell_bios]# = cc test.c=20 In file included from test.c:4: In file included from /usr/include/sys/systm.h:179: /usr/include/sys/kpilite.h:33:10: fatal error: 'offset.inc' file not = found #include "offset.inc" ^~~~~~~~~~~~ 1 error generated. If commenting above header then getting issues like: In file included from /usr/include/sys/malloc.h:43: In file included from /usr/include/sys/systm.h:179: /usr/include/sys/kpilite.h:33:10: fatal error: 'offset.inc' file not = found #include =E2=80=9Coffset.inc" The MALLOC_DEFINE is defined in malloc.h with macros _KERNEL. So can=E2=80=99t avoid these above header files. Can you please suggest me what am I missing here ? Note: This similar issues I am facing for smbios. Thanks & regards Shamsher Singh= From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Jul 28 16:31:17 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B1DC65F0DC for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 16:31:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wfdudley@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ot1-x32e.google.com (mail-ot1-x32e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::32e]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4GZfLD4Jtdz3QPx for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 16:31:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wfdudley@gmail.com) Received: by mail-ot1-x32e.google.com with SMTP id i39-20020a9d17270000b02904cf73f54f4bso2709034ota.2 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 09:31:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=6ThK3ztBsubV0BJvkSM8RM0iA7o16v+c6TrvGBVPZZI=; b=DD8nciJhn+/KLxoWn3CrDK3u/eCM67gvbMCJms8TnnXCRHFkUFj/7A1Ey1FpLZfTBe MU0LFQv/LdIDv7K6vWyc5D6yLDWJ2BxtZYeQSCGU83zX6VIVkj9zEyQKKxY6CWqSR7pA Tnza3+7cTC1XGnzgGdwaTyNbt4+HeeB2qipsRaZfc5G8u13KC940Jnh1u04qKAGRnmqj 66X83SBPeKZ46wtBRkmk9D50ogEUzZdTEWU6hMwTbS/j1JWTyp6JbIjJs/HF7+owZ++G GGcI4twP2RZnFPnMUbtru3zR1nEua8SymvY4wwzLRbzQQMXrq4znx34fzDeUqkyYzr9k iMeA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=6ThK3ztBsubV0BJvkSM8RM0iA7o16v+c6TrvGBVPZZI=; b=msDHUp/U2fMuEBmCdlUU0XRLt5xdSJYmJa/xclypsGNh2Z9jfY1PuKWIouiAcv05uz k6D+IhMTNA4mgVHgngyYUFcXUXipvXuTTRa6C/X5z+Izb8+mkn6RjSM8YnkbBphwl7E2 xCvuS1La1QzHRHxN5Qr/5p1U/u6dUpuxhMnxf5D7SQrJwEBHYGE9Rktpz3XPVFPK1gis 5xoAEJrtTWR7LgYSj9eb0dyhnq083meBz+zDF/WE4lSpJY1OZ/PtIT4TeWADf3eTkDMQ PwGKoY5kfdu8gH/epY9bj3vt2I+miLxsME/0ZaKYRYvwI/ETanZhmJT+1xeV1az5/qnr omoA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532EfT8ah0NYvqXN3XsG3MoxRtNNE4kbUwJds58pZaclBpWxlEpA EzVLWeCF7t/cwlT/mXijhBq9HiPQy9yX32FhJvAQCjh3N+jPxA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxZ+ZJZhTj4PWI+afEAEE0hy/C32VmWr47Ono75TGtSGB0ljCq+0GYM59J647QKYd6PJqeaxwuyr2VXlfRN0Es= X-Received: by 2002:a9d:6044:: with SMTP id v4mr611065otj.117.1627489870142; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 09:31:10 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: William Dudley Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2021 12:30:54 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: How to upgrade Mailman and keep Let's Encrypt ? To: freebsd-questions X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4GZfLD4Jtdz3QPx X-Spamd-Bar: + Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=DD8nciJh; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of wfdudley@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::32e as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=wfdudley@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [1.97 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com:dkim]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36:c]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(1.00)[0.997]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.98)[0.977]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROMTLD(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::32e:from]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.34 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2021 16:31:17 -0000 Hi, I'm running 11.4-RELEASE-p9, and obviously, it's time to move to 12. I'm running Mailman 2.1.34 which uses deprecated Python 27. I realized that when I move to FreeBSD 12, I will no longer have Python 27, so Mailman 2 will no longer work. When I do "pkg search mailman), I find the following: mailman-2.1.34 Mailing list manager with user-friendly web front-end py38-mailman-3.3.1 GNU Mailing List Management System, Core As an experiment, on a spare machine, I tried: pkg install py38-mailman-3.3.1 However, there is a conflict between py38 and py37, and so pkg wants to uninstall: py37-acme-1.16.0,1 ACME protocol implementation in Python py37-certbot-1.16.0,1 Let's Encrypt client That won't do, as I host several websites on the same machine with the mailman installation and they all want to have https (obviously). How do I solve this? Thanks, Bill Dudley hobby sysadmin From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Jul 28 16:58:37 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4520D6601A6 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 16:58:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from be-well.ilk.org (be-well.ilk.org [23.30.133.173]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4GZfxm3mNHz3hdR for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 16:58:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from lowell-desk.lan (lowell-desk.lan [172.30.250.78]) by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37C5A33C06; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 12:58:25 -0400 (EDT) Received: by lowell-desk.lan (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 32C5B15E3D02; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 12:58:23 -0400 (EDT) From: Lowell Gilbert To: William Dudley Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: How to upgrade Mailman and keep Let's Encrypt ? References: Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2021 12:58:23 -0400 In-Reply-To: (William Dudley's message of "Wed, 28 Jul 2021 12:30:54 -0400") Message-ID: <44pmv2tlxs.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4GZfxm3mNHz3hdR X-Spamd-Bar: +++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org has no SPF policy when checking 23.30.133.173) smtp.mailfrom=freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [3.99 / 15.00]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.99)[0.995]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[ilk.org]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(1.00)[1.000]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[gmail.com]; RCVD_NO_TLS_LAST(0.10)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7922, ipnet:23.30.0.0/15, country:US]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2021 16:58:37 -0000 William Dudley writes: > I'm running 11.4-RELEASE-p9, and obviously, it's time to move to 12. > > I'm running Mailman 2.1.34 which uses deprecated Python 27. > > I realized that when I move to FreeBSD 12, I will no longer have Python 27, > so Mailman 2 will no longer work. That's not actually true. Python2.7 is still present, and mailman2 still works for now. I don't know, pragmatically speaking, when that will cease to be the case. > When I do "pkg search mailman), I find the following: > > mailman-2.1.34 Mailing list manager with user-friendly web > front-end > py38-mailman-3.3.1 GNU Mailing List Management System, Core According to my understanding, mailman3 is not currently a full replacement for mailman2. > As an experiment, on a spare machine, I tried: > > pkg install py38-mailman-3.3.1 > > However, there is a conflict between py38 and py37, and so pkg wants to > uninstall: > > py37-acme-1.16.0,1 ACME protocol implementation in Python > py37-certbot-1.16.0,1 Let's Encrypt client Both of those can be built with python3.8 (anything from 3.6 on, I think, based on their makefiles), so py38 is an option if you don't mind having to compile those from ports. Also, mailman3 (again, according to its makefile) can be built with any python from 3.5 on. > That won't do, as I host several websites on the same machine with the > mailman installation and they all want to have https (obviously). > > How do I solve this? A common answer is to move from mailman to another list manager. mlmmj seems to be popular for this purpose. Another common answer is to continue to hang onto mailman2 in hopes that something else will emerge before you need to make the jump to another option. If you want to try mailman3 and stick with prebuilt packages, it might make sense to create a python38 jail. It would have to share some data access with the web servers, but that can be done safely. Good luck. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Jul 28 17:01:36 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41A21660702 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 17:01:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pkagan@videotron.ca) Received: from alt41.smtp-out.videotron.ca (alt41.smtp-out.videotron.ca [23.233.128.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "vl-vm-csp357.ip.videotron.ca", Issuer "int-SNINTCAP1-CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4GZg1C3lm6z3j2p for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 17:01:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pkagan@videotron.ca) Received: from LenovoPC ([173.176.219.200]) by Videotron with ESMTPA id 8mvumknvCyjLA8mvwmaqGy; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 13:01:28 -0400 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.4 cv=QZUFAuXv c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=61018d68 a=oaKXazPqqAQRKKEMLXbeDQ==:117 a=oaKXazPqqAQRKKEMLXbeDQ==:17 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=fk9r570aAAAA:8 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=r9oG_5cLJsaqyPZWPJwA:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=nvM6goE1pmvTfkMQbM8k:22 a=IjZwj45LgO3ly-622nXo:22 From: To: "'William Dudley'" , "'freebsd-questions'" References: In-Reply-To: Subject: RE: How to upgrade Mailman and keep Let's Encrypt ? Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2021 13:01:26 -0400 Message-ID: <004501d783d2$356c4da0$a044e8e0$@videotron.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0 Thread-Index: AQJ3jegJ7oEvX9zXONNPm+N4hEBV16oYhQGg Content-Language: en-us X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4xfFJRLJpNLP6JJj+jYRAZtztiwLG0HuMivKe53buYOH7/XhdM5Qpo17ouXTFvTI1veUU41CzJTSM1NN2MWGLV4EJ+3OOvs1nk2GlWUMLaS9UcShtkF6ua 2Rm0oav80hiaSPGYdO+DI2SZ+fNipJwEUebovyn09v0nTzfbiZIrJePFwSLUIO/ll2i98q8kU56/FolSwxUFKpy0IwkGPRlEGwTCH9rV4e87SfE33nQ9IMoZ X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4GZg1C3lm6z3j2p X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of pkagan@videotron.ca designates 23.233.128.28 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=pkagan@videotron.ca X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.40 / 15.00]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_GOOD(0.00)[23.233.128.28:from]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[videotron.ca]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:23.233.128.28/30]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[videotron.ca]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[23.233.128.28:from]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; FROM_NO_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[gmail.com,freebsd.org]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[videotron.ca]; ASN(0.00)[asn:5769, ipnet:23.233.128.0/18, country:CA]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2021 17:01:36 -0000 It's time to move to 13 you are mistaken...=20 https://certbot.eff.org/lets-encrypt/freebsd-apache just follow those instructions and remove the other one if you do not = need it. Also, it's very important to upgrade to freebsd 13.=20 -----Message d'origine----- De=A0: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org De la part de William Dudley Envoy=E9=A0: Wednesday, July 28, 2021 12:31 PM =C0=A0: freebsd-questions Objet=A0: How to upgrade Mailman and keep Let's Encrypt ? Hi, I'm running 11.4-RELEASE-p9, and obviously, it's time to move to 12. I'm running Mailman 2.1.34 which uses deprecated Python 27. I realized that when I move to FreeBSD 12, I will no longer have Python = 27, so Mailman 2 will no longer work. When I do "pkg search mailman), I find the following: mailman-2.1.34 Mailing list manager with user-friendly = web front-end py38-mailman-3.3.1 GNU Mailing List Management System, Core As an experiment, on a spare machine, I tried: pkg install py38-mailman-3.3.1 However, there is a conflict between py38 and py37, and so pkg wants to uninstall: py37-acme-1.16.0,1 ACME protocol implementation in Python py37-certbot-1.16.0,1 Let's Encrypt client That won't do, as I host several websites on the same machine with the mailman installation and they all want to have https (obviously). How do I solve this? Thanks, Bill Dudley hobby sysadmin _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Jul 28 18:30:56 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF7D2662E45 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 18:30:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wfdudley@gmail.com) Received: from mail-oi1-x234.google.com (mail-oi1-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::234]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4GZj0H6ssMz4mpH for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 18:30:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wfdudley@gmail.com) Received: by mail-oi1-x234.google.com with SMTP id o20so4840553oiw.12 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 11:30:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=Y9l4n918orc15b0ZcfVtTTf3jGw5UgU5SQ6qIXctHMg=; b=Gk4rQvTlrs0acYTyd76h+DXrjgH02fQjCUMOdwdbDzIXPBruUxTCZj0qbKQouE9jJO BG+/CN6Ynowjkuw/ZL0NLXc5tWIGeMRcDNQg3d/oWNUE4DEjIt9GXpAyub2qw5IykxEa Y+FSZL0+5WJd2j4zAGmOWc0olhBBSl8rUqPBd7joEFZpfwY1q8dLnjvTwhdnQ4g0AzuO WGwSM9qdE/v618857GXDIfG6SNs2chn0499xCNQbHC85opqG2dMdgzYVtHHZO+i+amps FU8dSlL2nb+3UJF9LgxxzfL3GjcUx9efx6jpNHRM2d2OjMn1+wvuKRGPU5M+azRaYZP3 Mb5w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=Y9l4n918orc15b0ZcfVtTTf3jGw5UgU5SQ6qIXctHMg=; b=VOaxhNb1IkjQIr4A+hatBYIJaWlIvuQLNBDZ7IdyS6ud4Pa6/hlpkBQSg1QP92jZIJ VrUaClTflgePfsLJgb0K6Tyz4Rx3sFK6pnSY5kqF9gu1kZvEV35Bai1q5/nJdtH1tXII IpVoAP0ViLOSD9UP2p/eDqZig08KunJSyNxb14mkH4QNJ33a++dSaOC5o6YBZXuh0SzF jKD228kt1TG5j+Vi2f+jCgSxPgU7Pybwmat4fHTrtxjsFpywJZ1z68jwou0DTRKaX2/f p2/NqQ1hgRUO+vt87tUvdUS/CmruIQabwQO+4Gu1xrkxXyz7M2DDARfLn2a/1TkpJLYe NItA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530RpaKLq5oxYy8j75gXPT1Cspl+oRDJ8J0NOEh6SPpSTrNW159a IvEKECzHdBIXTFiC6KuRy+hcqEtOdqNHw/6vhyGQkuI9Zwk= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxJxGujengEf5Vn4CUW52W0ziQtCS9raH1ZYrWF2UHeiOfj7QRz3imC1SEcWF/Nwdb8yJdnsZPYFb/38pP2dKE= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:aaf:: with SMTP id r15mr7488442oij.80.1627497055251; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 11:30:55 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <44pmv2tlxs.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> In-Reply-To: <44pmv2tlxs.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> From: William Dudley Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2021 14:30:39 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: How to upgrade Mailman and keep Let's Encrypt ? To: Lowell Gilbert , freebsd-questions X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4GZj0H6ssMz4mpH X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=Gk4rQvTl; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of wfdudley@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::234 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=wfdudley@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.01 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.999]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com:dkim]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36:c]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.99)[0.993]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::234:from]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROMTLD(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.34 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2021 18:30:56 -0000 Lowell, Thanks for your reply. I should have done more "pkg search" -- it turns out that certbot/acme are also available as a py38 package, so that solves the problem if I want to migrate to mailman 3. I just did some "research" on mlmmj, which initially looked promising, until I realized it hadn't had any work done on it since 2017! DMARC has made mailing lists challenging, and mlmmj has had no work done to it to handle that challenge. People are using mlmmj, from what I can see by googling, but also migrating from mlmmj to mailman and others. I have installed and played with Sympa, but it seems fiddly compared to mailman. It "works" but I haven't put it in production. I haven't experimented with mailman 3 at all. Bill Dudley On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 12:58 PM Lowell Gilbert < freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org> wrote: > William Dudley writes: > > > I'm running 11.4-RELEASE-p9, and obviously, it's time to move to 12. > > > > I'm running Mailman 2.1.34 which uses deprecated Python 27. > > > > I realized that when I move to FreeBSD 12, I will no longer have Python > 27, > > so Mailman 2 will no longer work. > > That's not actually true. Python2.7 is still present, and mailman2 still > works for now. I don't know, pragmatically speaking, when that will > cease to be the case. > > > When I do "pkg search mailman), I find the following: > > > > mailman-2.1.34 Mailing list manager with user-friendly > web > > front-end > > py38-mailman-3.3.1 GNU Mailing List Management System, Core > > According to my understanding, mailman3 is not currently a full > replacement for mailman2. > > > As an experiment, on a spare machine, I tried: > > > > pkg install py38-mailman-3.3.1 > > > > However, there is a conflict between py38 and py37, and so pkg wants to > > uninstall: > > > > py37-acme-1.16.0,1 ACME protocol implementation in Python > > py37-certbot-1.16.0,1 Let's Encrypt client > > Both of those can be built with python3.8 (anything from 3.6 on, I > think, based on their makefiles), so py38 is an option if you don't mind > having to compile those from ports. Also, mailman3 (again, according to > its makefile) can be built with any python from 3.5 on. > > > That won't do, as I host several websites on the same machine with the > > mailman installation and they all want to have https (obviously). > > > > How do I solve this? > > A common answer is to move from mailman to another list manager. mlmmj > seems to be popular for this purpose. Another common answer is to > continue to hang onto mailman2 in hopes that something else will emerge > before you need to make the jump to another option. > > If you want to try mailman3 and stick with prebuilt packages, it might > make sense to create a python38 jail. It would have to share some data > access with the web servers, but that can be done safely. > > Good luck. > From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Jul 28 18:54:26 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA3C566317F for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 18:54:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@boosten.org) Received: from smtpq2.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net (smtpq2.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net [212.54.42.165]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4GZjWQ01JBz4t7P for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 18:54:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@boosten.org) Received: from [212.54.42.106] (helo=smtp2.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net) by smtpq2.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m8oh8-0005qU-Dd for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 20:54:18 +0200 Received: from smtp.boosten.org ([84.25.247.31]) by smtp2.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net with ESMTP id 8oh7mheiB20j58oh8mewiP; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 20:54:18 +0200 X-Env-Mailfrom: freebsd@boosten.org X-Env-Rcptto: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-SourceIP: 84.25.247.31 X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.4 cv=TYT1CTch c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=6101a7da cx=a_exe a=JWBJsaPp29SgP5DpYRBqZw==:117 a=JWBJsaPp29SgP5DpYRBqZw==:17 a=e_q4qTt1xDgA:10 a=pGLkceISAAAA:8 a=ZUhuOzbQ778ca3xWGOkA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=-mjK2uLw3oSOJ2XeYjgA:9 a=W7Fd-32jKpt1lLTF:21 a=_W_S_7VecoQA:10 Received: from mailserver.boosten.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.boosten.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54E233993A for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 20:54:17 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at boosten.org Received: from smtpclient.apple (amon.boosten.org [192.168.13.105]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.boosten.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1C327399CB for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 20:54:15 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 smtp.boosten.org 1C327399CB From: freebsd@boosten.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.120.0.1.13\)) Subject: Re: How to upgrade Mailman and keep Let's Encrypt ? Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2021 20:54:12 +0200 References: <44pmv2tlxs.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> To: freebsd-questions In-Reply-To: Message-Id: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.120.0.1.13) X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4xfIMO8j0XbnPNQoRdwU1cQmloPL7CiWgoDNC8cKCdFSIisFrv+o4x2tZP4jolJY2OpgKetdEOdiRO49AkD26bBAXfhrdyGnkBAbIikRBP4zeaKYpGZMW8 Kmlw3c/1+cdCk3dOAAQEht3qGZncZu+0rXJEAtSWK/Ic8lsV8g22/3HF68pAB5s8KXN2VHoLir0YzlHJEKk5rWQZgkic1ucN0eM= X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4GZjWQ01JBz4t7P X-Spamd-Bar: - X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.50 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[boosten.org:s=myselector]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_GOOD(0.00)[212.54.42.165:from]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[boosten.org:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[boosten.org,reject]; FROM_NO_DN(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[212.54.42.165:from]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:212.54.32.0/19]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:33915, ipnet:212.54.32.0/20, country:NL]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.34 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2021 18:54:27 -0000 > Op 28 jul. 2021, om 20:30 heeft William Dudley = het volgende geschreven: >=20 >=20 > I should have done more "pkg search" -- it turns out that certbot/acme = are > also available > as a py38 package, so that solves the problem if I want to migrate to > mailman 3. >=20 > I just did some "research" on mlmmj, which initially looked promising, > until I realized > it hadn't had any work done on it since 2017! DMARC has made mailing = lists > challenging, > and mlmmj has had no work done to it to handle that challenge. People = are > using mlmmj, > from what I can see by googling, but also migrating from mlmmj to = mailman > and others. >=20 Hmm, it must be me, but you want your mailing manager to do everything: When I used mailman in the past, my webserver (either apache or nginx) = was responsible for certificates, and my mailserver (postfix) was = responsible for mail thingemies, like DKIM and stuff. This setup makes it much easier to switch to any mailing manager you = like. Peter =E2=80=94 It never hurts to help=20 - Eek the Cat! From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Jul 28 10:33:22 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57EE965879B for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 10:33:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from meetshamsher@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pl1-x636.google.com (mail-pl1-x636.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::636]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4GZVPF2v0Vz4lkd for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 10:33:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from meetshamsher@gmail.com) Received: by mail-pl1-x636.google.com with SMTP id t3so18441plg.9 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 03:33:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:mime-version:subject:date:references:to:in-reply-to:message-id; bh=ShZ/7X7oPLI9ej79B+X+0l0bdcI3oVQOah2r+zH/oWU=; b=G6oSkkESoqxrXzi4uCjHwRhdXnqtAEEee8iVMAlxxwYRCcj9RdzWeuLQlNylnmKLpx QaJl3kFbz7Carp6Od0thoYf50yE/DxIDG927o1WDuUREVfPQ61jl0bXMmcravpJxwwiG 8K+n+QN2S5+VUMJfISnlmX/JDLOJBIXwvnUwWnzp7wZCdNFroO3YeNJf4kS4qCCd9ko5 QRpSQ1rF9OvZlayogQ9oq3U7JasaSUloEzzhgYFr7Z61K1UQtEdAOOzypbpAUlLEDYky v1slUG/gY5fzXPGWE9yIjZFnMBk97LLPIIhCeVyBmszcxX30+BXN88PAf2dp29iXQPWO XMig== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:mime-version:subject:date:references:to :in-reply-to:message-id; bh=ShZ/7X7oPLI9ej79B+X+0l0bdcI3oVQOah2r+zH/oWU=; b=J9SHjBTL6RMzO5Qy1cttcK5GmwddIyctKjka3JLF+YksNi1Y5YGNnQ6gVOyYg0gnE/ AzB6i8yhVbKXhPeBLvJfqBNy10RbsuOSmkTBnGPFgK2/Fcu+YNvjPBF5t3/xT0S2fUy0 SpXruvpoAI/n5IsQxIDrxYoyazRPFX6f1CmR6EKXwwS5yYMjIAoqklxv1bz8eo9Ztyn/ ScY7Ak7MdCk3hGtnbCJdGixJA1PCz1I0Dx681lbmehv6Bold5eSDBZna4PIFFPFBeya1 //c1z+o5BG08NS/BL5NPeAdiruSCSBln2IywVmgIBeqxOx46JeLi0f6A9ArNt3APuAjm 8o0Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530q1f4l9veHvBR5f41oujQ0F5xkE0HGpuXSjn83ILneYQocCqwR 7oMaU7OMNVKDMxZpNP184Cz66QujDDQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxh227nkaBgblUPfg0/k5JYj5z6bmQYkt9EoE9aQ4j+gDFG8IJE+a9aiojFnFenxbPA/Fflgg== X-Received: by 2002:a63:1d18:: with SMTP id d24mr28565421pgd.69.1627468394157; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 03:33:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2001:420:c0e0:1003::353? ([2001:420:c0e0:1003::353]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n56sm6689882pfv.65.2021.07.28.03.33.12 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 28 Jul 2021 03:33:13 -0700 (PDT) From: Shamsher singh Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.7\)) Subject: Re: Regarding MALLOC_DEFINE related issues in kernel code usage Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2021 16:03:10 +0530 References: To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: Message-Id: <9E45B3A6-451E-4F92-ACC6-8B63750F9BE4@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.7) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4GZVPF2v0Vz4lkd X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=G6oSkkES; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of meetshamsher@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::636 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=meetshamsher@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.23 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::636:from]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.73)[-0.728]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com:dkim] X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 29 Jul 2021 07:37:00 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.34 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2021 10:33:22 -0000 Hi, Please ignore this mail. It=E2=80=99s done and working fine. Thanks & regards Shamsher > On 28-Jul-2021, at 12:32 PM, Shamsher singh = wrote: >=20 > Hi, > I am using below test.c file (shown as example) in freebsd13 and = getting below issues: >=20 > For #include and #include >=20 > # cat test.c=20 > #define _KERNEL > #include > #include > #include =20 > #include =20 > #include > #include > #include > #include > #include =20 > #include > #include > #include >=20 > MALLOC_DEFINE(M_NODE, "NODE1", "test Node"); > int main() { > int *ptr; > ptr =3D (int*)malloc(sizeof(int), M_NODE ,M_WAITOK) > printf("ptr=3D%p\n",ptr); > return 0; > } > [root@FreeBSD_build_machine1 ~/iproot/freebsd/mods/drivers/dell_bios]# = cc test.c=20 > In file included from test.c:4: > In file included from /usr/include/sys/systm.h:179: > /usr/include/sys/kpilite.h:33:10: fatal error: 'offset.inc' file not = found > #include "offset.inc" > ^~~~~~~~~~~~ > 1 error generated. >=20 > If commenting above header then getting issues like: > In file included from /usr/include/sys/malloc.h:43: > In file included from /usr/include/sys/systm.h:179: > /usr/include/sys/kpilite.h:33:10: fatal error: 'offset.inc' file not = found > #include =E2=80=9Coffset.inc" >=20 >=20 >=20 > The MALLOC_DEFINE is defined in malloc.h with macros _KERNEL. > So can=E2=80=99t avoid these above header files. >=20 > Can you please suggest me what am I missing here ? >=20 > Note: This similar issues I am facing for smbios. >=20 > Thanks & regards > Shamsher Singh From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Jul 29 12:46:15 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7856B673DC7 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 12:46:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kkchn.in@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pj1-x102e.google.com (mail-pj1-x102e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::102e]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Gb9J664dmz4dPg for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 12:46:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kkchn.in@gmail.com) Received: by mail-pj1-x102e.google.com with SMTP id ds11-20020a17090b08cbb0290172f971883bso15491353pjb.1 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 05:46:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=PtgvMGftZbIBRIgb5Nof7lI9DhIn9Q0ZYAeAzjzPtlM=; b=Vnex9fwpoW66eTh0Qw6vr1sm8DdKdrLCtV0Vkd50Hfgc9gEgVeOgh5xzjaJSpiEL10 TSsAPmkIuVmvzk/Vb8ICHLnrEhPZe6/dmpCkC61TATXBSdS4ZOzI7kGnphelHHovguUk 4uRXhp8eXeNuish/0fxQsh0ZRaTd5xl9F9H5Pi8WAFxlyV3t+CwVBz+AyaRg4kRVIigd LG4aNwZAaIXkmjBvntT7cBQJ3hManpcscEHgVZUiQobnwRDbTWXvX+bg3NyzIknqduKv DAA2zP5ZGfMzIzrdbJs89dWXD2T0N9bYgIJA/VKgH/gm2ncuc5KfntdRwWvhJCCVLZUU D3JA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=PtgvMGftZbIBRIgb5Nof7lI9DhIn9Q0ZYAeAzjzPtlM=; b=M5mV099+j8bZ3DCZSh4IHixAdyAI4oGLAAwJ2cSn6xMbMW4iCz4hKh4kOW0uTeZfIB unXc8TD4XXHHzVsEQJSmEj0wnKurdgC3j2T4oAFYQEp1/DvZkIptYAqXYXCX74tLiX4W lWRJ+RRd4QHHaxmNZ6WIZz1O7ffQBdZMzy3A8zc51Fr05BAtY2m872XbrGr6t1Ex+C9n +/aphs8yJSlZthDcpnkd3ciZ+26HsacE2fGQRcVA+5DWftDGo6OvBXC4BgGj0SjL8UdZ a7vozifSmmQjunOeCJjJwt61cYCaGOI6RGUjBFYajVlJEZHIe6SgMUWhbYlWaD5RWALx Q2BA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532/ei4bnFME9eK8v5Zs4YyId5tkG98hpV4j1ABp4lkMSppfaBN9 ZJQbq6XB/rlVyucKuiG41MQqO8tt+uj3GYXXsDZE3jBzfJUwgQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz+nzqjOFncFqYSFOGwV77lYdd0lorlPPgMxmQKJzIcTrVIpc+qhhtj5HCSjYokRGQAYpvt4jQcKfGOMny3aXs= X-Received: by 2002:a63:6ca:: with SMTP id 193mr586469pgg.265.1627562767946; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 05:46:07 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: KK CHN Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2021 18:15:55 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Cans We take Snapshots of VMs with Volumes attached? To: freebsd-questions X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Gb9J664dmz4dPg X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=Vnex9fwp; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of kkchnin@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::102e as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=kkchnin@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.99 / 15.00]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36:c]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROMTLD(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.99)[-0.995]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com:dkim]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::102e:from]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.34 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2021 12:46:15 -0000 Fello BSDians, I am in the process of migrating VMs from Redhat Virtualization ( oVirt KVM ) to our OpenStack Cloud setup( Ussuri version of OpenStack with Glance storage and KVM hypervisor) presently we are getting three qcow2 files from each VM with logical volumes attached to the Virtual Machine. one OS image ( qcow2 format) second boot (qcow2 ) third data volume as LVM partition (qcow2) Is there any way to get all the three files can be extracted as a single image file in qcow2 format. OR I can rephrase the question as follows .. I am able to get snapshot images of VMs without volumes attached. But unable to get snapshot of Vms with volumes attached. Is there a way to take snapshot VMs with Volume attached . ? Thanks in advance Kris From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Jul 29 19:56:25 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBFAB652F38 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 19:56:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from denradford@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pj1-x102d.google.com (mail-pj1-x102d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::102d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4GbLrS6VTLz4ZZ3 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 19:56:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from denradford@gmail.com) Received: by mail-pj1-x102d.google.com with SMTP id j18-20020a17090aeb12b029017737e6c349so6691202pjz.0 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 12:56:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:subject:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=U4/R2jrCOdJpUFOc/Q9MuipVqaQ/65e5NXQTfvx9CMI=; b=UxbuXQn7aBjPhs+R7ssQ6sexd6WWRdLznhtYE6ziFzf38/Fm5YFh067QO1ppfkNBVo aZm2V+An1JOTZBlUJ93I0xDat0/6JLf3QDe1dN/EbEfp8GknTqC4Ym0f+IiWF45thX9E sBUuOHxiw/E6UYBVRJtMgcAKxFjX6j7VfSeDb4QQfiI9MZWwPJat2wJho39otGp13ZqU tp2cX0PrgKIFGmk1HdthZQ350KzoAbIBgYTXn7q6fCoYoXTY4VkL+VrwCNjbM1gUkjRd G/wdYAznWCLH1ebv6v4fDXigcUODIgS1OHqVtty6QzFlqrysq+IMMMjBX1vVyvcSTgZw rbDg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=U4/R2jrCOdJpUFOc/Q9MuipVqaQ/65e5NXQTfvx9CMI=; b=k2YZCWOcwGtiRWtlksEUmtWiA1qcA6Q9vYmv3AtPPzdBXqGk28Utqhkz8TjoqgtR/R W64392j4Tun6LoOF/Y+nE9ZD2Ag2PX+MNC4h5DXB8clEsezmodNGcinfZr/GeNc7SDkO NiGKKZTwstEBiQ9vsOucvdoR+q4wfy8x8UxBTa16bhBfX5LAM0kTTO8JC+Z1F2zK2Uti 9CBcbHQ0+9jfOTjcSOAAp97DMPhR3QSmQkXLjGxsAUA4tWpqibHQmIgcAwwduhzRG9h4 jJP00r5MbaPm8tj88uOsgjI7oFpFa6ErGrupbLpacJudEBEpa8uepmvaQslB8jnbsrzn 2bIQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533bKM3KDvncNEQQZWZYE4egCLrNZXTkxOek8S9hh35KXW+AUFeH s7r1xxlUbZdoWEhdssUAET2O3zt/its= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzbptBKpIAiyi4inSiQU+qnWdmTqbVihVvtODfG3zl+HbocbTOtqi5Gh2HVByttxPGN8rhE/A== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:d911:: with SMTP id c17mr3107568pjv.137.1627588577353; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 12:56:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.subatomicsolutions.org (tunnel484407-pt.tunnel.tserv1.yyc1.ipv6.he.net. [2001:470:1f2e:30::2]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t9sm5660534pgc.81.2021.07.29.12.56.16 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 29 Jul 2021 12:56:16 -0700 (PDT) From: Dennis Radford X-Google-Original-From: Dennis Radford Received: from [192.168.0.103] (S010600133b0e2e42.cg.shawcable.net [174.0.7.10]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail.subatomicsolutions.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BF9762004B49 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 13:56:14 -0600 (MDT) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: IPv6 on update2.freebsd.org Message-ID: <543c02ef-8715-fbae-8ef3-7c583ec1c208@subatomicsolutions.org> Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2021 13:56:11 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.12.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Language: en-US X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4GbLrS6VTLz4ZZ3 X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=UxbuXQn7; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of denradford@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::102d as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=denradford@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.03 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::102d:from]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.97)[0.973]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com:dkim] X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 30 Jul 2021 04:34:13 +0000 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2021 19:56:25 -0000 To whom it may concern, I just wanted to notify to proper individual(s) that IPv6 connectivity to= Name:=C2=A0=C2=A0 update2.freebsd.org Address: 2620:11c:5001:1099:1337::117 appears to have stopped working. Long delays running freebsd-update and does not respond to ping6 either. = IPv6 on update.freebsd.org appears to be working normally. Tested from 2 = separate and dissimilar networks. - Dennis From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Jul 30 07:10:16 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B364B661E53 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 07:10:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from grahamperrin@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wm1-x32c.google.com (mail-wm1-x32c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32c]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Gbdnz3ymNz3pKd for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 07:10:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from grahamperrin@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wm1-x32c.google.com with SMTP id d131-20020a1c1d890000b02902516717f562so5684778wmd.3 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 00:10:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=KzDRRq8lpse5a7THzUWdlHReafNTqbuJbJKUZ6UtgXk=; b=p/C/BHTNDKPZP1BkDvhtlLbzJicFnD5O36z+y2tic9VtJjG/5eP8eWoV5o1v97Q1mx NJMRdNT8rL6po+hRSY1zDHeeXxJoYwp9WIOADZ78rOvQRvVsiWNalZk1TthMR4LYufSg ukCYembEd4bueWZwBKOofUzPWME5zQw2Qr3WdqlD0nqUkmn6fR1u8j7NIZ/2VAKbFDpM 83CTKHJvStPw/3lGWbr5T1itx0M6TBXpX3zGVRLz1SAbqj/D626L+N3vZmMxyOIXNW4V Q7YSpGP3bCXniJEVK+xpy8b+DWmnibvje0anVol7w/xDiV/0lL8knpleZLUe1Q+QywJf ZOcg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=KzDRRq8lpse5a7THzUWdlHReafNTqbuJbJKUZ6UtgXk=; b=P+YZLpz0v8lJ4pDeRypsKwfgMlkUNmPQ9mCq0F2wIY5EQDnWpcFz8rUQ2x+GgOKHMN 6g3VMeKSjJhiA2SHcjBFHsy7yD5mfvGwD90e8yHNGLfR3VAwMcNLm//uD3hG+4PkSEpI M9NpBg5mPHIABJvOihnZDFdIK8c1ma56XCe8PAXGsjwKt59bU48APx16NS2M5WQNS9mX Wo+vvq5yl3tnrMGp27NV7PLvvbgGxdTHgPDZ/fAhIfM4UMo/hmFk2fRUyv8yc2u6TAKy m4/Gcg2hyQ40o+PS0v/R5Qua6GI7hSDayfCun3BJ16ep9OrbhZxfH290f4XmcIYYMho5 MyUw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533LXS4IlgL1VY3dMGWf34Qh5E+vfRbqM5RpsHMax7QgIIPJBzRz i89hSIs+GuKF6ryECcSF1WGZSm7ArYl0Gw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy2uv/ycERyaVptXjSEpqsK3DQUWA0eJOHU0rTl4Wpwh4KIQ6kqK+C3TB/wJcM2jww8i7eCZg== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:f414:: with SMTP id z20mr1428588wma.94.1627629007514; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 00:10:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2001:470:1f1c:a0::2? (tunnel642390-pt.tunnel.tserv1.lon2.ipv6.he.net. [2001:470:1f1c:a0::2]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h15sm656994wrq.88.2021.07.30.00.10.06 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 30 Jul 2021 00:10:07 -0700 (PDT) Subject: (257498) IPv6 on update2.freebsd.org To: Dennis Radford References: <543c02ef-8715-fbae-8ef3-7c583ec1c208@subatomicsolutions.org> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Graham Perrin Message-ID: Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2021 08:10:05 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.12.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <543c02ef-8715-fbae-8ef3-7c583ec1c208@subatomicsolutions.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-GB X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Gbdnz3ymNz3pKd X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b="p/C/BHTN"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of grahamperrin@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4864:20::32c as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=grahamperrin@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a00:1450:4000::/36:c]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[gmail.com]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2a00:1450::/32, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com:dkim]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2a00:1450:4864:20::32c:from]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2021 07:10:16 -0000 On 29/07/2021 20:56, Dennis Radford wrote: > To whom it may concern, … Thank you. Reported: From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Jul 30 07:49:16 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B146166290C for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 07:49:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from philip@freebsd.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [96.47.72.83]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Gbfg045dtz3t6Y; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 07:49:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from philip@freebsd.org) Received: from auth1-smtp.messagingengine.com (auth1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.227]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: philip/mail) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6FAE427ED0; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 07:49:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from philip@freebsd.org) Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailauth.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 235A527C0054; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 03:49:16 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 30 Jul 2021 03:49:16 -0400 X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvtddrheeggddutdefucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvufffoffkjghfgggtgfesthekmhdtredtjeenucfhrhhomheprfhhihhl ihhpucfrrggvphhsuceophhhihhlihhpsehfrhgvvggsshgurdhorhhgqeenucggtffrrg htthgvrhhnpeekjeelueelgedtueelffffheefhfefffehjeduteegheekudelieelieff ueefteenucffohhmrghinhepfhhrvggvsghsugdrohhrghenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiii gvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehphhhilhhiphdomhgvshhmthhprghu thhhphgvrhhsohhnrghlihhthidqudduieeivdeivdegkedqvdefhedukedttdekqdhphh hilhhipheppehfrhgvvggsshgurdhorhhgsehtrhhouhgslhgvrdhish X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 03:49:14 -0400 (EDT) From: Philip Paeps To: Dennis Radford Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IPv6 on update2.freebsd.org Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2021 15:49:10 +0800 X-Mailer: MailMate (1.14r5820) Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <543c02ef-8715-fbae-8ef3-7c583ec1c208@subatomicsolutions.org> References: <543c02ef-8715-fbae-8ef3-7c583ec1c208@subatomicsolutions.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed; markup=markdown Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2021 07:49:16 -0000 On 2021-07-30 03:56:11 (+0800), Dennis Radford wrote: > To whom it may concern, > > I just wanted to notify to proper individual(s) that IPv6 connectivity > to > > Name:   update2.freebsd.org > Address: 2620:11c:5001:1099:1337::117 > > appears to have stopped working. > > Long delays running freebsd-update and does not respond to ping6 > either. IPv6 on update.freebsd.org appears to be working normally. > Tested from 2 separate and dissimilar networks. Thanks for the report. As far as I can tell, IPv6 is working fine on this mirror. Can you please share a traceroute? Graham has helpfully created a bug for this. I've assigned it to clusteradm now. https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=257498 Thanks. Philip -- Philip Paeps Senior Reality Engineer Alternative Enterprises From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Jul 30 12:32:30 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCF626666E3 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 12:32:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsduser@cloudzeeland.nl) Received: from poseidon.cloudzeeland.nl (cloudzeeland.xs4all.nl [83.161.133.58]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "cloudzeeland.nl", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Gbmxp0hCSz4kVp for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 12:32:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsduser@cloudzeeland.nl) Received: from poseidon.cloudzeeland.nl (cloudzeeland.nl [10.10.10.36]) by poseidon.cloudzeeland.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6729E433D1 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 14:32:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [10.10.10.34] (pion1.rpicloud.nl [82.176.127.71]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by poseidon.cloudzeeland.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0C14C433D0 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 14:32:22 +0200 (CEST) To: FreeBSD Mailing List From: Jos Chrispijn Subject: Symbolic link to external server Organization: Userland rocks! Message-ID: Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2021 14:32:21 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-GB X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Gbmxp0hCSz4kVp X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of bsduser@cloudzeeland.nl designates 83.161.133.58 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bsduser@cloudzeeland.nl X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.59 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+a]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[cloudzeeland.nl]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; HAS_ORG_HEADER(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.98)[-0.982]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.99)[-0.989]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.31)[-0.314]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:3265, ipnet:83.160.0.0/14, country:NL]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2021 12:32:30 -0000 I have a NAS that I access with wind* network clients by calling \\10.10.10.55\myfiles (1) My BSD server 10.10.10.5 has a directory /mydocs (2) Is it possible to create a symbolic link in (2) to directory (1)? I tried, but got stuck as I do realize that a user validation should be done prior to be able to use the symlink. Regards, Jos From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Jul 30 12:38:22 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDF1E666BFF for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 12:38:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tomek@cedro.info) Received: from mail-wr1-x430.google.com (mail-wr1-x430.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::430]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Gbn4Z0HHVz4kWg for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 12:38:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tomek@cedro.info) Received: by mail-wr1-x430.google.com with SMTP id b7so11151722wri.8 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 05:38:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cedro.info; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=0g/uMiG9zY7gqKTh+mnVREPtPJU/ZN8PAYVCnv0Xars=; b=Dx2uhXW6MPIrrCvCV37cPHaS184rLiqsvJyc7zklLxliZi58Hvc3HY2/Q405RlUZd8 GBbYq2Sz/dVEFuAQnVTeqB+rYoZek1akX9Pipg7Dq9EPr+tmQJBFF8vzvS6FpSTYZN81 +amabAwnaUZj7/u880aT3D3ByKxtBjKZy1AVZeudyUr4vAMMqjuYCyqAebZCl+Jbo4oh NI3SQNwCbs1XK3vstdAq/FXeOqfmBtvPLbnWkyPlE9+M31A+SIUJi9NLMmr4C9EN2kpN X2rBTMR4xSxDJgTpv8uKUXz1vNu9NSwJHghYs1712mH2EoYexg7wKXQDBWz8FJWmmi0O 2nvw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=0g/uMiG9zY7gqKTh+mnVREPtPJU/ZN8PAYVCnv0Xars=; b=b9Ihl0ThQDeveEEOKqTzFq6Z4/dDCp4C8eSYaMFMe4h1fz8mytXS69HH9zBQE9HajL SMZAlKNrYWzRELPqp8QW8GsXkpQZ0XmGv2QGIvi7q2Oq0Ub1+aVG/kfgvQ8U3moFDPhy VJ70o1IgyZC0nfNWHRVuz0pJ1BpHYEzBm5EW+zsfwMXs+uI/VkNf/RaZXY1mPWuS9but JHrpcTEiiDJ1kQs3O9OlXPYeS1Go6JbEiNL1fcflonFImoYwW7/UZIQWZiQHGFbACuSF KU/P7YfKxBYANo0ChKMaQwlFikqbPGgzXTHdNFWDg8CzW0TFjQX1zp87+32fc7oDApde MFFg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530zPIEwwMD5tFAdL39g/ID8bs3FD70M2R4rDsjZcvrTuv5DZ16I V22jh/xWi7eajUyapaUGdX9/LDCW8yh4M2YG0VxEBQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyql6ivsCYP/kb2Wlp872VU5LL/YCeufrKfZJgz3QKd6kxddPjt0EwXtIYCxeYjgDXMaT311IaSvBMnuDC9Vbc= X-Received: by 2002:a5d:540d:: with SMTP id g13mr2793897wrv.329.1627648694242; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 05:38:14 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Tomasz CEDRO Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2021 14:37:59 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Symbolic link to external server To: Jos Chrispijn Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Gbn4Z0HHVz4kWg X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=cedro.info header.s=google header.b=Dx2uhXW6; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of tomek@cedro.info has no SPF policy when checking 2a00:1450:4864:20::430) smtp.mailfrom=tomek@cedro.info X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.29 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[cedro.info:s=google]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[cedro.info]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[cedro.info:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2a00:1450:4864:20::430:from]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.99)[-0.990]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2a00:1450::/32, country:US]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2021 12:38:23 -0000 On Fri, Jul 30, 2021 at 2:32 PM Jos Chrispijn wrote: > I have a NAS that I access with wind* network clients by calling > \\10.10.10.55\myfiles (1) > My BSD server 10.10.10.5 has a directory /mydocs (2) > Is it possible to create a symbolic link in (2) to directory (1)? > I tried, but got stuck as I do realize that a user validation should be > done prior to be able to use the symlink. I did setup of Synology once and there was dedicated option to put symlinks to other network shares. You had to enable that by hand, so probably possible with additional option for SMBD. I don't know the details sorry. Alternatively you could just mount (1) and (2) next to each other..? Maybe this will be useful: https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/5120/how-do-you-make-samba-follow-symlink-outside-the-shared-path -- CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Jul 30 12:56:23 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8026C66723A for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 12:56:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@boosten.org) Received: from smtpq2.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net (smtpq2.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net [212.54.42.165]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4GbnTL4rBBz4ls5 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 12:56:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@boosten.org) Received: from [212.54.42.107] (helo=smtp3.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net) by smtpq2.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m9S3i-0000Jy-Rw for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 14:56:15 +0200 Received: from smtp.boosten.org ([84.25.247.31]) by smtp3.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net with ESMTP id 9S3imt97V7m979S3imQpjp; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 14:56:14 +0200 X-Env-Mailfrom: freebsd@boosten.org X-Env-Rcptto: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-SourceIP: 84.25.247.31 X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.4 cv=JsiSEO0C c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=6103f6ee cx=a_exe a=JWBJsaPp29SgP5DpYRBqZw==:117 a=JWBJsaPp29SgP5DpYRBqZw==:17 a=e_q4qTt1xDgA:10 a=0Jf2bkFXAAAA:8 a=RtVn0d3et_i9nWtwLDwA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=hbMzIEXqMJzRD74b:21 a=_W_S_7VecoQA:10 a=AgSr8P-dQcD0pteseJxs:22 Received: from mailserver.boosten.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.boosten.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 003A43DEF9; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 14:56:13 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at boosten.org Received: from smtpclient.apple (amon.boosten.org [192.168.13.105]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.boosten.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7D2B23DEEA; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 14:56:11 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 smtp.boosten.org 7D2B23DEEA From: freebsd@boosten.org Message-Id: <21CEEAC9-2A02-4F43-8B6F-B73553449CF6@boosten.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.120.0.1.13\)) Subject: Re: Symbolic link to external server Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2021 14:56:11 +0200 In-Reply-To: Cc: Jos Chrispijn To: FreeBSD Mailing List References: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.120.0.1.13) X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4xfL11hbOH5v5i3i16i8mwMwvXHhNUFc2Y9/NqEuNyMBL+NhIMkfQ3CNq8KhFLyKNXRJRQUMVL7ii/Jdg6s8OSsiwlwa3Iz6382nXSBqEkMGiL9TVsKfFj tTP8+mapM466CPxR8UegifwCfePb4HIh2eYHoz30+ML5MWmlvY+PdBGgNbWXnXkUzpeMH+0Cw6F+sLd4NsyzoraPSQ8KVz1xUhHzHAHpKWPZdmTqI2lxqjCd zB9hXIuvBwAGLI/jxYxgFw== X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4GbnTL4rBBz4ls5 X-Spamd-Bar: --- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.50 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_GOOD(0.00)[212.54.42.165:from]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:212.54.32.0/19]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[boosten.org:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[boosten.org,reject]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:33915, ipnet:212.54.32.0/20, country:NL]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; RCVD_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[boosten.org:s=myselector]; SH_EMAIL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[10.10.20.55:email]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DBL_PROHIBIT(0.00)[10.10.20.55:email]; FROM_NO_DN(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[212.54.42.165:from]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.34 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2021 12:56:23 -0000 > Op 30 jul. 2021, om 14:32 heeft Jos Chrispijn = het volgende geschreven: >=20 > I have a NAS that I access with wind* network clients by calling = \\10.10.10.55\myfiles (1) > My BSD server 10.10.10.5 has a directory /mydocs (2) > Is it possible to create a symbolic link in (2) to directory (1)? > I tried, but got stuck as I do realize that a user validation should = be done prior to be able to use the symlink. >=20 >=20 Hi Jos, I do exactly the same, by mounting the smb share of my nas under a = folder somewhere in my freeBSD tree. @mount -t smbfs //user@10.10.20.55 /files = /mydocs And the credentials for the user are in /etc/nsmb.conf Peter =E2=80=94 It never hurts to help=20 - Eek the Cat! From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Jul 30 20:41:33 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C934F66D553 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 20:41:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wfdudley@gmail.com) Received: from mail-oi1-x229.google.com (mail-oi1-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::229]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Gbzp44bfCz3mkT for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 20:41:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wfdudley@gmail.com) Received: by mail-oi1-x229.google.com with SMTP id a19so14913904oiw.6 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 13:41:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=cWYTPEeofkjNgUSJe+sE5fdnxeF6q2kjtIKg9UzbjKM=; b=aYdAs2ln8X80FzKf3fnec8xUM0JV/rv9LyH8arJHlQr28WVbqBg+Xfyc/OSryF/2hG RLhaGyW6aQdOiVI7r+XA1BJl/Gz3Vs8J46JjcqaRMxiHRx7mNzQ6E9IhxSuPTIYyh/vl aLsFpiFGUMvehsUHJuTkcpSn33FH0M2VA1XjzGu2+OPTtEGGCEOGFu9IHPOhxGAHvNJR I7Vi/I7tXVyEScTONyUqil25u0oSpQ7RfXkzkKgN3KjTU3v2/zfrBtGDgW/lcRPYaBj2 dpnbNSobsxmU0hF3C2FPYY8tKqDBOPlgy0ghT44RKOgQeS5jpU0R4/hCiu3Xnpd/cPyX /adQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=cWYTPEeofkjNgUSJe+sE5fdnxeF6q2kjtIKg9UzbjKM=; b=RKveglgHUEx49Q1L/blicble61Tyy1BhNNPY/1K0HhDhpTVBkKDhjbTph78fSWn27K FDNX57TDff0P65Ut+SUBCaZGGy/ae9lrEBaVFFROFFO8HM9fjIC9svxiUP/wX/5iKSp5 f8S5KqqzCLsatEABLbFLG5XZUA+x1EYQmK8fkFAv+W7yk8RUc36eo941OqIwA93mbuJK d84SJmUNL3mIIGlWwP9HXjrWUPvXwR1tNBKzvYLi3KPzCqz6kszhHnw7xIEHwmZ7nEWL rKpYnKmr9CU8QrGyRofsLVjJan8YyoWeEpQXQuLLthX423mBCez85WbwOoSJI1+XMgjg ku0w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530tzKywcuVHqDoYIBXBbyAH701kD2G1dTtBqLtUY/Di3CAAZp+V rmZiVy0A+ivfFmjRNrd78yV+X5IxB87W2ERu3nt3tXlpvNk= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzdpkkXMZspqtgT3HAdqT+Yzayt8XmBGZFJZiQd0tiy3ySpgrMsSgCEmJEEj7bRdTkvtO6VTwcpJRVwKToONQs= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:aaf:: with SMTP id r15mr2574157oij.80.1627677691962; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 13:41:31 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: William Dudley Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2021 16:41:15 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Has anyone used mlmmj and/or mlmmj-webview? To: freebsd-questions X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Gbzp44bfCz3mkT X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=aYdAs2ln; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of wfdudley@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::229 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=wfdudley@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.10 / 15.00]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36:c]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROMTLD(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.10)[-0.103]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com:dkim]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::229:from]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.34 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2021 20:41:33 -0000 Preparatory to upgrading the FreeBSD 12, I'm trying to find a replacement for mailman 2 since it's no longer available in pkg or ports. (I find building from source fraught sometimes, so not confident that I can build from source after the upgrade.) I've installed mlmmj and mlmmj-webview. I got mlmmj "working", though I had to patch the source code and re-compile to get it to actually send mail. It decided that since "Return-Path:" was missing on emails I was sending (from localhost), that there was no "envelope", and refused to work. I hacked the code to use "From:" address as the envelope address. Obviously people must use this without hacking it, so how is it supposed to work on FreeBSD with sendmail? As far as mlmmj-webview -- I can't find any kind of documentation at all as to how one is supposed to connect this to Apache (or any other web server). Just running it from the command line returns nothing, and invoking it via a browser gets the same empty result. Both programs are installed from packages, so in theory, they work in FreeBSD. Thanks, Bill Dudley From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Jul 30 20:50:58 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2833566DE16 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 20:50:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from odhiambo@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qt1-x829.google.com (mail-qt1-x829.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::829]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Gc00x2FTdz3nQX for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 20:50:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from odhiambo@gmail.com) Received: by mail-qt1-x829.google.com with SMTP id h27so7348517qtu.9 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 13:50:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=+9brwOnA9KBvXqse6WgwbAtfthx55NpFVcaIGT4Zr5Q=; b=CKRiZpMC6B4gFFtSdj3tXv85yivsD+Q611KAVYkdpRBTPA3nlyUODjaNZKHZyBJUdW T+ZfLUCJwd8wIql4TvzALJbdzncliexMqKzmJXLRLU4G560PQ+kNd36kWumh4nwgLohI YPLAPcQdOivlZrKBx2yfB4uh53dj2fh6KXaum73zsXEB78h7XczfVKkS6r68q3mFpl2x LIW1RojTqa5vxf8U7i+RSbcfBDT6eE1qvCVLgaKHPwEDffstTCvc6EhleBHKru9Uwev5 vCAzwOHtH3b3NmET2bpN86956I9HM0qjUOx+3N+CnhdNR40KlxEc0bpf2pDN26A4Gjrn SICg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=+9brwOnA9KBvXqse6WgwbAtfthx55NpFVcaIGT4Zr5Q=; b=bzO0HUCv0cJ7GSflzMJh+jsQIfS/HkdJRf4gZ83j03wJyAfH95fZnC9IUmPFnAkJQL GrR+fD1sOXdV/rL6djbWVl90GYTxqcf0ytRxRVy8gQZzMMtc/chz+1aR14hwhRxcOXRn X0ZWC3rU3EdFQZHCFBCk/VTAyOQJnI3A0wCxKPHXDJQPKJuhDCSfEmtpj9RgvCJrEiAe Dfywfll/gfwU0MKaP4HHRIYP9Hk1oWKXOkSKv5YKP5AhmdcsFVbNbFAWYBIBIicyD3K8 v2o3y/TJ3rkVhjd7yeJwosIY9Eb2FKTkwCnD4mRBkHFfP1gTwhuFnKgS/iOmRUCaPGWB 3zFA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530w6V2oNPhB51rOH5UJWppyXhiZHm/Bo2dMUh4yE9T/4dldti7e UyD0322n987Lv8DPY8IIa/cCMW/eLIn/sd1GLQY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw/AdUSziElnV2HjsSaARDrRtDGLvuwU6h1zSk1+7aPOqS3DSrtFD8HnWVd0cGFsDl9N6d0qMaktGQ5OsFJkd8= X-Received: by 2002:ac8:7691:: with SMTP id g17mr3942056qtr.287.1627678256619; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 13:50:56 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Odhiambo Washington Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2021 23:50:44 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Has anyone used mlmmj and/or mlmmj-webview? To: William Dudley Cc: freebsd-questions X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Gc00x2FTdz3nQX X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=CKRiZpMC; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of odhiambo@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::829 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=odhiambo@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.00 / 15.00]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36:c]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROMTLD(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[gmail.com]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com:dkim]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::829:from]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.34 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2021 20:50:58 -0000 Why don't you just go to Sympa? For me, I've been and still running Mailman 2.x and I have never installed from the ports. I have always manually compiled. I'm bidding time right now - to migrate to MM3. I don't like the news about it though. I'm also thinking about Sympa. On Fri, Jul 30, 2021, 23:42 William Dudley wrote: > Preparatory to upgrading the FreeBSD 12, I'm trying to > find a replacement for mailman 2 since it's no longer available in > pkg or ports. (I find building from source fraught sometimes, > so not confident that I can build from source after the upgrade.) > > I've installed mlmmj and mlmmj-webview. I got mlmmj "working", > though I had to patch the source code and re-compile to get it > to actually send mail. It decided that since "Return-Path:" was > missing on emails I was sending (from localhost), that there was > no "envelope", and refused to work. I hacked the code to use > "From:" address as the envelope address. Obviously people must > use this without hacking it, so how is it supposed to work on > FreeBSD with sendmail? > > As far as mlmmj-webview -- I can't find any kind of documentation > at all as to how one is supposed to connect this to Apache (or any > other web server). Just running it from the command line returns > nothing, and invoking it via a browser gets the same empty result. > > Both programs are installed from packages, so in theory, they > work in FreeBSD. > > Thanks, > Bill Dudley > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Jul 30 22:12:55 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A0C066E83F for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 22:12:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from johnl@iecc.com) Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "gal.iecc.com", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Gc1qV46xQz3s7B for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 22:12:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from johnl@iecc.com) Received: (qmail 34079 invoked from network); 30 Jul 2021 22:12:48 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:cleverness; s=851d.61047960.k2107; bh=R3I2F1+VECUhctvBSL+uTLWw+S8YgRp88CROyOnizdg=; b=q6cCQPdmE9RaIAME8koeCrWdM+5AK21dSpaG52qA98W+S6Y5hyB/Jscg6bNrWzKQn8wcrOWfXXxwppBg7qVsbrdRd1Xt3JL9Y11aHT6f5sEmG3GGdKuAmRDpzY6D1sh8JT3YyWsCtRKJHNOyEjd8P+3p84WFRqs/f3DgPQVyhLV46DC4rOPmXASDwhHeoBOTO/5X2DuqjgZInQFWGxlPbgInPRmxZTj7vrxoKVDDM3S/UIVTjdfKzQt+oQuQMXwyZQ7ABorPFQunj+XY6jKQYOoBBQ2TnDwbd3EpmQsipk6e9c6HDe42GyofzEw6E+g0BGOLf8zSH/R+fK6Cv4MCgw== Received: from ary.qy ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.2 ECDHE-RSA AES-256-GCM AEAD) via TCP6; 30 Jul 2021 22:12:48 -0000 Received: by ary.qy (Postfix, from userid 501) id 9D355255BDB6; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 18:12:47 -0400 (EDT) Date: 30 Jul 2021 18:12:47 -0400 Message-Id: <20210730221247.9D355255BDB6@ary.qy> From: "John Levine" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Cc: odhiambo@gmail.com Subject: Re: Has anyone used mlmmj and/or mlmmj-webview? In-Reply-To: Organization: Taughannock Networks X-Headerized: yes Cleverness: minimal Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Gc1qV46xQz3s7B X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none ("invalid DKIM record") header.d=iecc.com header.s=851d.61047960.k2107 header.b=q6cCQPdm; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=iecc.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of johnl@iecc.com designates 2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=johnl@iecc.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.70 / 15.00]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2001:470:1f07:1126::/64]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; HAS_ORG_HEADER(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[iecc.com:~]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[iecc.com,none]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED(-0.40)[2001:470:1f07:1126:0:78:696d:6170:received,2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461:from]; R_DKIM_PERMFAIL(0.00)[iecc.com:s=851d.61047960.k2107]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; FREEMAIL_CC(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:6939, ipnet:2001:470::/32, country:US]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2021 22:12:55 -0000 It appears that Odhiambo Washington said: >Why don't you just go to Sympa? That's what I did. I've been quite happy with it. R's, John From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat Jul 31 02:17:22 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 658EA653257 for ; Sat, 31 Jul 2021 02:17:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from philip@freebsd.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [96.47.72.83]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Gc7FZ1vYfz4jv6; Sat, 31 Jul 2021 02:17:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from philip@freebsd.org) Received: from auth1-smtp.messagingengine.com (auth1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.227]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: philip/mail) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2426A3A7; Sat, 31 Jul 2021 02:17:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from philip@freebsd.org) Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailauth.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id F069627C0054; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 22:17:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 30 Jul 2021 22:17:21 -0400 X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvtddrheeigdehhecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefhvffufffokfgjfhggtgfgsegrkehmreertdejnecuhfhrohhmpefrhhhilhhi phcurfgrvghpshcuoehphhhilhhiphesfhhrvggvsghsugdrohhrgheqnecuggftrfgrth htvghrnhepteffteevvdetvdfhjeeuhfdvfffhtdejveetffektdeigfevgffhudefteei tdehnecuffhomhgrihhnpehfrhgvvggsshgurdhorhhgpdhhvgdrnhgvthdpmhgvthgrph gvvghrrdgtohhmnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhf rhhomhepphhhihhlihhpodhmvghsmhhtphgruhhthhhpvghrshhonhgrlhhithihqdduud eiiedviedvgeekqddvfeehudektddtkedqphhhihhlihhppeepfhhrvggvsghsugdrohhr ghesthhrohhusghlvgdrihhs X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 22:17:20 -0400 (EDT) From: Philip Paeps To: Dennis Radford Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IPv6 on update2.freebsd.org Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2021 10:17:06 +0800 X-Mailer: MailMate (1.14r5820) Message-ID: <231C862D-9705-4C35-BE58-E0AA5397B151@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: References: <543c02ef-8715-fbae-8ef3-7c583ec1c208@subatomicsolutions.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Embedded-HTML: [{"plain":[55, 1397], "uuid":"138F3C1E-854F-4974-8CE9-807D9B53DD73"}] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.34 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2021 02:17:22 -0000 On 2021-07-31 07:40:19 (+0800), Dennis Radford wrote: > On 7/30/2021 1:49 AM, Philip Paeps wrote: >> On 2021-07-30 03:56:11 (+0800), Dennis Radford wrote: >>> To whom it may concern, >>> >>> I just wanted to notify to proper individual(s) that IPv6 >>> connectivity to >>> >>> Name:   update2.freebsd.org >>> Address: 2620:11c:5001:1099:1337::117 >>> >>> appears to have stopped working. >>> >>> Long delays running freebsd-update and does not respond to ping6 >>> either. IPv6 on update.freebsd.org appears to be working normally. >>> Tested from 2 separate and dissimilar networks. >> >> Thanks for the report.  As far as I can tell, IPv6 is working fine >> on this mirror.  Can you please share a traceroute? >> >> Graham has helpfully created a bug for this.  I've assigned it to >> clusteradm now. >> >> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=257498 >> >> Thanks. >> >> Philip >> > Sure thing. > > traceroute6 to update2.freebsd.org (2620:11c:5001:1099:1337::117) > from 2002:b840:df6b:1::11, 64 hops max, 28 byte packets > 1 2002:b840:df6b:1:da47:32ff:fe6c:75a8 0.345 ms 0.180 ms 0.150 ms > 2 2002:c058:6301::1 28.439 ms 26.260 ms 26.769 ms > 3 10gigabitethernet1-14.core1.sea1.he.net 26.981 ms 27.091 ms > 27.256 ms > 4 v6-six2.metapeer.com 27.065 ms 27.316 ms 27.051 ms > 5 2620:11c:5001:982:: 36.566 ms 33.899 ms 33.846 ms > 6 * * * > 7 * * * > > Same results with traceroute6 on second separate network. > > - Dennis Looks like metapeer simply doesn't have a route to 6to4 addresses. It can get to your IPv4 address just fine though. I don't know if this can be fixed. I will ask. Are you using 6to4 on purpose because you don't have native IPv6, or is there some configuration causing you to prefer 6to4 over native? Philip -- Philip Paeps Senior Reality Engineer Alternative Enterprises From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat Jul 31 16:05:15 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 838F56609A9 for ; Sat, 31 Jul 2021 16:05:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from michaelsprivate@gmail.com) Received: from mail-il1-x12d.google.com (mail-il1-x12d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::12d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4GcTcp4Zzjz4j34 for ; Sat, 31 Jul 2021 16:05:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from michaelsprivate@gmail.com) Received: by mail-il1-x12d.google.com with SMTP id q18so12476030ile.9 for ; Sat, 31 Jul 2021 09:05:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=ypi7l9ZM8d84USFDUss+Rji3x+wiUF3GwigRcxoJloU=; b=tCBO0h2Wi7AYg0UV+bigkmR1VjKe+08zeCbtq0i2AfjKp/k4/A5LnwgmEfNAaPnMws YKc7tophPFQ2fMzSXxA0bqHUwlH9ZK8XTJDuNMSFTJVHVMCzIo9Ah+yFTWUbfYi1MbdY bwfXqPw3Sj73p+GXciuuH2DVbmhDXZcUQCGkPgqGBNTnGxJAZBT9yrJjkE8UIsAFhriP vjrP2BOrm/FPGYJcmxOnNK3d8HYTW7k8CheecIouVi0m+o5rMBLwA89uLp+gfQSWXF9T 3A0BYH6V7WR8dgUYRKVPMdsGu/NlcOpMq9nX8fr+wxcPrlBTWIq1xfdjDjDvCgq/72da mN3A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=ypi7l9ZM8d84USFDUss+Rji3x+wiUF3GwigRcxoJloU=; b=khk512wk1eCFpbt/lmcbuZ4NuXQMubnQI6kNvTgxCbe6L1o2PUF49YC5H/leg7Idsh W7Vbk7pNCm1lhXtDZ8vgNqgoqilsh1GjXdtEMvPa+UlbXIlN4ejEt7DU5RwjLeXUa622 PyBMjp3saHkXwKzc9pijC+ZX/HSG2yIXh957EpnAhHtsITpSv8Jk7fik34eHz1/OSoBp huDYt0DHMqgBoR8TbiK6TCeQjxK9r8w4cl6GoYILN4kpDL1zDP7Ihk8YmvRDaVHycQPB sG1e9vJvQ4WyDe27Jx+ro0FV+lPtOxPXvpujsQDW13wPvc5QCXONCVB0N7v1QYuWHYQW 5Vmg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530ML2QRBLaijWNaGIO9HsXvD+JD6BNZmyNZ232fD3ZLz/t0JRSZ aYcUaOVo1MT+lK81hQrW3HQzxVsJBs3cb3SsmK3hr/VhtZw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyMt3uSx8V6hCfzGDr1ErS9CnWR89bMQnRCZi9s+hRPMUprinyxzK0FzdTuENw8vcTAdqilmXl5ohDtn+r6j8s= X-Received: by 2002:a92:c605:: with SMTP id p5mr5828792ilm.209.1627747508005; Sat, 31 Jul 2021 09:05:08 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Michael Schuster Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2021 18:04:56 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: KDE/Plasma + sddm: graphical login pauses a while, then restarts. To: freeBSD Mailing List X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4GcTcp4Zzjz4j34 X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=tCBO0h2W; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of michaelsprivate@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::12d as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=michaelsprivate@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36:c]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROMTLD(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::12d:from]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com:dkim] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.34 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2021 16:05:15 -0000 To all, thx for your suggestions on- and off-list On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 7:40 AM Michael Schuster wrote: > Hi, > > I'm running CURRENT as of Saturday night (built myself) and KDE (installed > via pkg and working fine with the version updated around April). As > indicated in the subject, I use sddm, and have been for the largest part of > a year. > > For about the last two weeks, after I do "pkg update" & "pkg upgrade" into > a new BE and reboot, > I see the following behaviour: > - I type in my password at the greeter's prompt, > - the greeter window disappears, the usual progress bar KDE presents > reaches about 1/3rd of its usual breadth, and stops. > - after a while (hard to say, probably only a few seconds), the > screen turns black, I see only the mouse cursor (which moves if I move the > mouse/touchpad) > - after a few more seconds, the login screen reappears. > - I see no discernible error/warning message displayed. > > for completeness' sake: > - login on a text console is possible all the time. > - I didn't change my password during this time. > - till before this weekend, I was using scfb, now (finally! :-)) I can use > amdgpu, there seems to be no difference. > ... this issue was resolved after updating all pkgs today, no configuration changes I can recall. cheers Michael -- Michael Schuster http://recursiveramblings.wordpress.com/ recursion, n: see 'recursion' From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat Jul 31 22:27:19 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F060665C8A for ; Sat, 31 Jul 2021 22:27:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Gcf5f5xP6z3MXT for ; Sat, 31 Jul 2021 22:27:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id CA041665468; Sat, 31 Jul 2021 22:27:18 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9CAA665467 for ; Sat, 31 Jul 2021 22:27:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wr1-x431.google.com (mail-wr1-x431.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::431]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Gcf5d6n6Tz3MZd for ; Sat, 31 Jul 2021 22:27:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wr1-x431.google.com with SMTP id z4so16424398wrv.11 for ; Sat, 31 Jul 2021 15:27:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=JGkjzkCqIvjLk4ftW/okKLSPOVmUhHQy+aticYzrkZ4=; b=qFh/eboork7MX91G+HEMdNSt35/d6ZdGnojpckrmqPJkJS9pWxMvZN9gFMolWC4gUJ ycS8FXvlObOWJWZeGmyEX1LgDfZlZg9QPk11PyNm6JWCk4cZEdVE7f7h5IoemvN/prHd h9h/JCBlPrZKvtu8Y4pO4MW60pgz7kgi/NdpeSnQFOc82mUUgfTAXrO78bvExgN7GGWM gGilaO0q8R3M5cHLLyiHrkQkCeVMf1cG3jItk8UrFx2rMTs4ZSvVNhb7xzFVaglQX+BD 8C5gf4sKhuF0Loqubq7fdhb4Lm6voXyVaDsSxprHH6q321JpM32EyJTWK5Q6ew/UfQh+ H1Sg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=JGkjzkCqIvjLk4ftW/okKLSPOVmUhHQy+aticYzrkZ4=; b=HEe0pwvugE/fTvhQbzEMoH1R9k4Fv9EqhRysmJmgWS2i/MrJ2hGrqtoJ3wrtG6FnoJ i0Cbk5vNp84mefOsthxt3aaELE+K91ZV1dauW2kBG5JOmCyBsxysp+aKWWsjHU2s3EZm RJ+8B5viWZbCbD78WwmmC9SSlutHIJLjdRWRlzXs6eGcEFfo80Xk+3IApIxufxiFT1wh b0A64LVSNKfmcfVPHwVavkwWTbORmVYg+5JPfg5IbOHtB5YceS9qjIwJCij6g7on2f0u oIJCtfvtMZczfL4uzjrKYOa0/2blPUZtgIOauog7Yno2RWJmdOhAHIwhoapZz8jV0OUm UEuA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533IWarfRE+FPIgBMW5CNzZwDz7c0ZoN67PEALtlmzeOxq9h/CzB Li3HCheDhhDnWTA0jyFhYaUX4f/sAyrS8YPfH6pwAMrJLruQWw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyp6jq0vRHfP54M/k7qUTlsv9NTsNQ2nIzrmBL4vah+3lCMyRzWfO2ukv9Dmrt85Q3AjQmZTDaHSgxVEWGNVT4= X-Received: by 2002:adf:f302:: with SMTP id i2mr9690843wro.186.1627770436784; Sat, 31 Jul 2021 15:27:16 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Kevin Oberman Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2021 15:26:59 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Does openmp still require gcc? To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Gcf5d6n6Tz3MZd X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b="qFh/eboo"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of kob6558@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4864:20::431 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=kob6558@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.43 / 15.00]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a00:1450:4000::/36:c]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROMTLD(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.73)[-0.733]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[rkoberman@gmail.com,kob6558@gmail.com]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2a00:1450::/32, country:US]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[rkoberman@gmail.com,kob6558@gmail.com]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com:dkim]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[questions@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2a00:1450:4864:20::431:from]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[questions] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.34 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2021 22:27:19 -0000 I was surprised that a port (ImageMagick7) ws compiling with gcc. Looking at ports/Mk/Uses/compiler.mk and discovered: .if ${_COMPILER_ARGS:Mopenmp} .if ${COMPILER_TYPE} == clang USE_GCC= yes CHOSEN_COMPILER_TYPE= gcc .endif .endif I thought that clang support for openmp has been around for quite a while. Is this a FreeBSD-11 issue or is it historical and obsolete? Or am I just confused? I used to trip over openmp conflicts all the time, but I thought (hoped?) that they were a thing of the past. -- Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer E-mail: rkoberman@gmail.com PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683