From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun Aug 8 06:27:10 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDCD0650355 for ; Sun, 8 Aug 2021 06:27:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hruodr@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wr1-x430.google.com (mail-wr1-x430.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::430]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Gj8Q54kQtz3jQY for ; Sun, 8 Aug 2021 06:27:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hruodr@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wr1-x430.google.com with SMTP id b11so713968wrx.6 for ; Sat, 07 Aug 2021 23:27:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mime-version; bh=Hk7HcCxtzodqQ6znFULFjQ7DWhdHrilcJEsV8Bbvgus=; b=XoTJl8G4N2v/iK9DmlrAG6JqIs4Iah9n6lIhXDacrCox/c69MVDhbBVYV2ttpp8KNm 3Z9xuj6x9UIu1qMN6e9HBNfgXfM3SFkqrFDKqpm2XseLnjxxI9jtiyUOfY7Ewqz7GTqu wxJ6Nou8CT0qWJ5ubIWbY1nSrD3barp3Gi7/ZRc2p3Qb4pRdEizl3v/dOVjKGem8PZMS ZefOM0o5hNZZQqePmLmZF5+7SZbcPCtuIYbEkrjdTovd7jRHSqHvGaGMbXytCKiftmsp rzJdWuz2KLWCRXBf82K+CoBRyjpiCb6ojBWKMHnLRl96lQY5RAdI4waqE2t43hBgFvbn 7u+w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mime-version; bh=Hk7HcCxtzodqQ6znFULFjQ7DWhdHrilcJEsV8Bbvgus=; b=CrjsTO7apxORIe3on4YBHhbJ7tp4MBs7cxXQcsWbunUOePrPtbIsLF2D4G1IXOinMi SAh9amvIuqUyVwriRTpMvy6r7ryLt9DN/PvrBcGnTpnMGahQAVR/YvqKj/QQZ0l+tpHF PINTIJfuHo8vt1gvqTXmZhso5iKDI+ALGBtgJa3k72csYcd7oKYFb0iUy+s3HsfYtQ+F Qc0A+Oxs2LxM5SLGRGMSOr+RpOgX/wQkiV0++xP0aHkW131zMsCQIyZgM2i1j0KXZBmu WW3b2KZuPT/qJHvbiuzzzqbxhG/obiPfDsDFvO4opL3bzr1tKNsU4TiuEeruzaDGHn/y i72Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531BTpLJfscXUCUrxuHevQHtAxgqK75PavBFeUN/mR1BTwUu9a66 HD6NVHgLkmnckXoz6CwceS4KriW5+vGa2/dN X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzDvNILsZRcGjSp9d2a7jWqaWft1TquV2dh0rqg9IAa3ROAnPaunwX4Ur5dhS2rQFsge8LcLA== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:59ab:: with SMTP id p11mr18283105wrr.238.1628404028607; Sat, 07 Aug 2021 23:27:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.33.101] (ip5f5bd19c.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de. [95.91.209.156]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o24sm15662769wmm.37.2021.08.07.23.27.07 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 07 Aug 2021 23:27:08 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 8 Aug 2021 06:26:14 +0000 (UTC) From: Roderick To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: motd service (FreeBSD 13) Message-ID: <8dc523a7-4916-fe5d-1a98-2b2ac2b904e@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Gj8Q54kQtz3jQY X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=XoTJl8G4; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of hruodr@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4864:20::430 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=hruodr@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a00:1450:4000::/36]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2a00:1450::/32, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com:dkim]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2a00:1450:4864:20::430:from]; RBL_AMI_RCVD_FAIL(0.00)[95.91.209.156:server fail]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Aug 2021 06:27:11 -0000 Tasteless. Absolutely unnecessary change making the system more complicated for nothing. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun Aug 8 12:58:37 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44C8D65628C for ; Sun, 8 Aug 2021 12:58:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alexander.galato@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lj1-x22c.google.com (mail-lj1-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22c]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4GjK5l5yVCz4ZqG for ; Sun, 8 Aug 2021 12:58:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alexander.galato@gmail.com) Received: by mail-lj1-x22c.google.com with SMTP id n6so6253073ljp.9 for ; Sun, 08 Aug 2021 05:58:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=to:from:subject:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=7tufe4y0rI0vr2AyjDWUrKUFzaOIqmhh+fVOy03Yftk=; b=TQd0KhSCO/lew24FqKpvIm5FK+GYmUQjemXWQzE5Zf/yUbI+31Ql5xR3vKPo4OBAP7 uqIZCnLyBnUx+NwLx+RJli0HdS24YLK595Dpi6YHAzqaPuevlyfXkfrMlwIfWkbQ8LC6 0P3Jd5bD8BOSXTWBdFkmLW7zU5hrBz2feUJq1BWJH8RObNRTGT78lruNUNk4xrhDwur7 kEUsQ2NxUcNvGNJdEwxajXU2+ejzkDizKye/KmqpSu9TFHWrPmFqfgQyf0DgIFRPdL2/ YqCRGHgJjcqPoovYC3i6gn3JjzZLDwezl3oHL8rhH6SBS6boEhUoGg4DTvcn8uNAP6Vp f/fw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:to:from:subject:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=7tufe4y0rI0vr2AyjDWUrKUFzaOIqmhh+fVOy03Yftk=; b=YvWTHjEPfxrMjaUtHDI3uM6FcvF8XX1lEhaKHVgKwxoNz7o9ht8Y+rAcaklhepnBCh Mk3ZhDwHuUO9G2W571pD3tL3GG5ljII38+85A+ZkR/oTiEOH98I+wzbGNAEcGOV4J14X SNgr0u9vuLS20eP1T8BshqTqsOr00cfCm8OqAnNXXhAXkZR2ZVMxNheWx+z04zoAf77q Y50RqrgO5msLXhseOzqHY0xe41H/fAiUdx57ftFMCWJd1JMgcWhtmxnx2apbS/gBBDtf zWNZR2jY8Z48ykkByEgjQobSFECIKJGkviRNqAT6wo1gUU61sQU7WgdVRp3tEYX1CJY5 9JTw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532+G8je0kyupu0NYHB9DZbEemnWndC9Et6yUe7RRhdKcazmHkfh 9066V3xxdxsyasu8DwCPB4tllQHAv1w= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxZx+/dpHyRDMORJy2YvlZkHQUl3zux4fxETNjyArDva6GKy4FRLGRf/nT2Qe+FURZpAG6kow== X-Received: by 2002:a2e:a90b:: with SMTP id j11mr12220970ljq.475.1628427514367; Sun, 08 Aug 2021 05:58:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.3.155] ([46.149.59.52]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l9sm1260330ljq.79.2021.08.08.05.58.33 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 08 Aug 2021 05:58:33 -0700 (PDT) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Alexander Galato Subject: Pkgs for xetex and luatex under aarch64 Message-ID: Date: Sun, 8 Aug 2021 15:58:33 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4GjK5l5yVCz4ZqG X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=TQd0KhSC; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of alexandergalato@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4864:20::22c as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=alexandergalato@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a00:1450:4000::/36:c]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2a00:1450::/32, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com:dkim]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2a00:1450:4864:20::22c:from]; RBL_AMI_RCVD_FAIL(0.00)[46.149.59.52:server fail]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Aug 2021 12:58:37 -0000 Hello, Didn't find freebsd-aarch@FreeBSD.org, so will try get help here. Pkgs for ports tex-xetex and tex-luatex are missing on Raspberry Pi. But in ports tree they are present and seem to can be build Regards, Alexander From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun Aug 8 13:12:29 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1554656708 for ; Sun, 8 Aug 2021 13:12:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nathaniel.nigro@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lj1-x235.google.com (mail-lj1-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::235]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4GjKPn2N0tz4b6m for ; Sun, 8 Aug 2021 13:12:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nathaniel.nigro@gmail.com) Received: by mail-lj1-x235.google.com with SMTP id h17so8221419ljh.13 for ; Sun, 08 Aug 2021 06:12:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=neg+3FJ7+YWyVmvaelcZ+K8B4SQbDgmrlimxbqPK9VI=; b=ivi9gITmLAGb9ui6mRNT8fv0cSpAje6Su0Y27t1sDYXPv61Zwat/orVi8p032Qlmbg Ou2I2GDTIOvnL1wkdFLozR9hSmrDD/x6QpyWbaP2y1CANW8l5yJWmLEjZ/fNEsZ4E/Ea 3t86cna/pA+2xH8vQVR2EgTOSuxVaIe2+7TqbUdubxt4zcHrwZRViU03/Ru2N1qX0Qwi nHSvVS1/ar8+Z9+YflB8eJooRfC6OsLMYDOyagoaIsAO37Z/+yzSXMeUur5KDDYI6onv kf8aY2+aNrXkWNbr08EBPVVReY/R/0ib8Pp0PsYT/BVqv8WdTun3APV0H1vP6chIzCwf iQdA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=neg+3FJ7+YWyVmvaelcZ+K8B4SQbDgmrlimxbqPK9VI=; b=TLpmBgF0a0nt76tK6Hs4ovtUjVx60rWLEeFr+8Rc255lVo3+cB8D3VYXOuH48RZDBL lVs8PIzpNfneD3AbBvovzGr9+tVSSyFDWzaJ59DgCYzJjMrdYAxLHFJEhyblqU4z8UgS w74eQchQQ0nVVJc3HboovcXQdreUfTy4mygG4CUbbitvO0H4Yr1U3Gs5UHqrdW5HMYo7 Wi9YvWtyAQiA/Cs0qu6668QLjRzkErvG3qacDfd3l2eoIvxGLYRf6IG/oj0ktEmsJRwD IAPikPLeXPG8MNLHSWGpr67BUT5U66c3Y0O9oWeppJUM6vMjsKgaKnTZ5clGhIm0zH/g SzKQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5313hM/D1exFJQF13dgwi95ihzXzH5Wjf2MeJXyB5fngrF4THgbc /oWlfkGIyjMs5loKLm1yuRo4HgPN4KYzmM/BI+vqqupp8bc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxDSLfVHvPDC7Jfg/gqbhoz/v44msnM2FDuKcw24B9GfsCol4H5xpknbN9grN4m22nGe++MIUCtTmB3F/S8JyY= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:b0c8:: with SMTP id g8mr9881952ljl.444.1628428342214; Sun, 08 Aug 2021 06:12:22 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <8dc523a7-4916-fe5d-1a98-2b2ac2b904e@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: From: Nathaniel Nigro Date: Sun, 8 Aug 2021 09:12:11 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: motd service (FreeBSD 13) To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4GjKPn2N0tz4b6m X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=ivi9gITm; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of nathanielnigro@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4864:20::235 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=nathanielnigro@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a00:1450:4000::/36:c]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROMTLD(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2a00:1450::/32, country:US]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com:dkim]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2a00:1450:4864:20::235:from]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.34 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Aug 2021 13:12:30 -0000 Completely agree on that sentiment on the motd =E2=80=9Cservice=E2=80=9D. = Completely unnecessary On Sun, Aug 8, 2021 at 9:00 AM Roderick wrote: > > Then please, say it in the list. Only so we can avoid similar future > "developements". > > Rod. > > On Sun, 8 Aug 2021, Nathaniel Nigro wrote: > > > Agree on that > > > > On Sun, Aug 8, 2021 at 2:27 AM Roderick wrote: > > > > Tasteless. Absolutely unnecessary change making the system more > > complicated for nothing. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > -- > > -=3DND=3D- > > > > > --=20 -=3DND=3D- From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun Aug 8 13:40:11 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5F656569C6 for ; Sun, 8 Aug 2021 13:40:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from grahamperrin@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wr1-x432.google.com (mail-wr1-x432.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::432]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4GjL1k6lJ0z4dJ6 for ; Sun, 8 Aug 2021 13:40:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from grahamperrin@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wr1-x432.google.com with SMTP id m12so17689062wru.12 for ; Sun, 08 Aug 2021 06:40:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=4w8R2FNiVaoH8hB6PlrTfVDKROy3oZ1SeFvz7UJLVfI=; b=d4prNp6C7miGxGpPzlzun5XHRopK+cd+TMGe0xnXc6uWaAJZFzg9gV5OC0MsozGsNU Yg5GTuV0aMP5svb3fEfhZICjLEt/TS1mJbqldfr+JeEJl7rlv29lSeB+7vsRDt3iqHlK yFXa31njGeJoPmK+BrylZcrE/yMRhXYXTaT4EL+jLj2/GdDzEIrqmBDtJRNIuKyvf3re ojQmD6DV7O2PVxmYck0TlK4pFxWqTGMRN+nQUttXDOaAqLPgVNiXqWHSyMo1DMTTRJTV wLwFw5k1+MdzjziyASnjbH+6fmZ4xkhz6qIE0QDP+/mACYiv3ohNvOOdmj8xT1Ic/iS5 st1Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=4w8R2FNiVaoH8hB6PlrTfVDKROy3oZ1SeFvz7UJLVfI=; b=NJuQet7zdfqgwfZ/PJosP68hiJ0W6X7L++ckBYJyyBoAthB9LTBmOPTy5iVOQa9fUZ l1bohVrH9ic/Qkn+qywVYFRLNplU3otUR8dBrNhVdRV6DYtEJIb3CMOyP+wJSypoYAit cza4EdN9Uv0wDT+szdHplOyKshvaopKMHfsmfJg0SwV7EBozwmlMM+ZfsIw+Gi8LZOqq aPjVBs/24xTu/sG9NJpVl6c106/5Cl57I7UKEJG+Z8566i+vgf4GwOQAFsLKKNylhGiu KhZ+zU+6NbOr2Y37C3vjps1yFeP9ScOKDZND5qga8luoqGFlL85wq9YUWrpWHL9xDMhn 10fg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530bVSOmxpy3DkUwwsUQWAFmIXxxmkmKeWkSwLqdjDSVLL3Hrzn6 WggaL/wmqgJC6dKBZqmaYLI/K1BfnPI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzfk9J1lRMdaG4onL5h+KOtp7NY41DXcFTt2JpuWRmJUxLY64XxiWJeuCjCThlUBZntGw17MQ== X-Received: by 2002:adf:e9c3:: with SMTP id l3mr1929597wrn.300.1628430003310; Sun, 08 Aug 2021 06:40:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2001:470:1f1c:a0::2? (tunnel642390-pt.tunnel.tserv1.lon2.ipv6.he.net. [2001:470:1f1c:a0::2]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h4sm16712668wru.2.2021.08.08.06.40.02 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 08 Aug 2021 06:40:02 -0700 (PDT) Subject: motd service (FreeBSD 13): no complaint To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <8dc523a7-4916-fe5d-1a98-2b2ac2b904e@gmail.com> From: Graham Perrin Message-ID: <4a3109b6-7cb6-8d6d-e10d-bd13bb3a4e63@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 8 Aug 2021 14:40:02 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <8dc523a7-4916-fe5d-1a98-2b2ac2b904e@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-GB X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4GjL1k6lJ0z4dJ6 X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=d4prNp6C; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of grahamperrin@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4864:20::432 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=grahamperrin@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a00:1450:4000::/36:c]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2a00:1450::/32, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com:dkim]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2a00:1450:4864:20::432:from]; RBL_AMI_RCVD_FAIL(0.00)[2001:470:1f1c:a0::2:server fail]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Aug 2021 13:40:12 -0000 On 08/08/2021 07:26, Roderick wrote: > … "… no complaint during the two years before 13.0 was released …" From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun Aug 8 14:10:52 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3995A6573C4 for ; Sun, 8 Aug 2021 14:10:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nyakov13@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lj1-x233.google.com (mail-lj1-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::233]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4GjLj72Jswz4gMj for ; Sun, 8 Aug 2021 14:10:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nyakov13@gmail.com) Received: by mail-lj1-x233.google.com with SMTP id x7so8113686ljn.10 for ; Sun, 08 Aug 2021 07:10:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=message-id:from:date:subject:to:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=5Uizc8lIBScbi59bC5okMtmxg1Y0bfYkYCFC6oloa8o=; b=juxontNNY3CjOSMfoOM0VZkfKm9iO5Gdw5fFokBNxHvEtsj5a8OE7Md9eO4OgziuYm IfP77IAQOosy/n3iuG3R//Jt3cOxaq355wOLnyWoKcv4ic5lQAF5chMwMl8RDuBMIV7b kVVkWZ96ImzjeOrrzg6evlXXPK8cmuEl+PrRr8sIUm9/UwMKjN0h8hZxvQa4G6FlGG/e NRDfTXFW2BiAMdnxQYagU9f76VXpL/4T3ldQmR271nBQDMg2fSMolsv5Q/AnJ65qUFsB 4PG7JyO2VMLoooUW+Jua3Pgr+VBCfg+qO2wvnnUAHn3iPzATkSjXOlgTf5IBVgFvWfZI dmlw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:from:date:subject:to:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=5Uizc8lIBScbi59bC5okMtmxg1Y0bfYkYCFC6oloa8o=; b=qZ7O4tlvTPIdDtzbc29UEMbOKFtVELvA/QLAkIsRyDLUwQhtUFAOaNXzmcj+vzmEN/ qIOOI8AgDNIM2rSEimt5Xz+cTCc9VtOerByHV5/tmBqTNx9hkaVPFM2+VrkWtYFQkmXZ CLRuggv5hSgOtw36UWQCfcaakSwK+mSDQtfq0iBBs/S8zSDaerz4ssql026Ozl4QeMRk eTTOLFvXtfLNmBYU1NWW3dZAh6oNPR/0DhRM/C67hyj8mRguLzGB4wqNI1biwJHHOwwK ynHWN/xyupLZgQcpul4+ChVros9GZWtV9zlSxivnWSW2sJm20A5n6E6J6Uc64ncOd/U4 waxg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5317XTBWjtOYkSaExic+Zw4cTnamaIrXym4Ce1b3z72wnB3Exhe2 B+l8b+9aXraAcxbgg9lW4aNGj1Z7Fck= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyIt5aBDREZQu7joGYcNUUIocebhoF7CCnbkV9uj8IR4NcQY4yOKyGq4UP5RoGCluZI4Xysbg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:651c:1784:: with SMTP id bn4mr12363082ljb.371.1628431843675; Sun, 08 Aug 2021 07:10:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2a03:7380:21d8:ff72:7c77:d324:cbf3:408b? ([2a03:7380:21d8:ff72:7c77:d324:cbf3:408b]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c13sm1433920lfm.208.2021.08.08.07.10.42 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 08 Aug 2021 07:10:43 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <610fe5e3.1c69fb81.732e3.890a@mx.google.com> From: Kira X-Google-Original-From: Kira Date: Sun, 08 Aug 2021 17:10:41 +0300 Subject: Re: motd service (FreeBSD 13) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4GjLj72Jswz4gMj X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=juxontNN; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of nyakov13@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4864:20::233 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=nyakov13@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.90 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a00:1450:4000::/36:c]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; MIME_BASE64_TEXT(0.10)[]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2a00:1450::/32, country:US]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com:dkim]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FAKE_REPLY(1.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2a00:1450:4864:20::233:from]; RBL_AMI_RCVD_FAIL(0.00)[2a03:7380:21d8:ff72:7c77:d324:cbf3:408b:server fail]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Aug 2021 14:10:52 -0000 U28gaXQgd2lsbCBzaXQgaW4gbWVtb3J5IGFzIGEgZGFlbW9uIGFuZCB3YWl0IGZvciBtZXNzYWdl cyBvciBzb21ldGhpbmc/IElzIG15IHVuZGVyc3RhbmRpbmcgY29ycmVjdD8KSWYgbm90LCB0aGVu IEkgYW0gb2sgd2l0aCBjaGFuZ2VzLgpPdGhlcndpY2UgaXQgaXMgcGxhaW4gd3JvbmcuCgo4INCw 0LLQsy4gMjAyMSDQsy4gMTY6MTIg0L/QvtC70YzQt9C+0LLQsNGC0LXQu9GMIE5hdGhhbmllbCBO aWdybyA8bmF0aGFuaWVsLm5pZ3JvQGdtYWlsLmNvbT4g0L3QsNC/0LjRgdCw0Ls6CgpDb21wbGV0 ZWx5IGFncmVlIG9uIHRoYXQgc2VudGltZW50IG9uIHRoZSBtb3RkIOKAnHNlcnZpY2XigJ0uwqAg Q29tcGxldGVseQp1bm5lY2Vzc2FyeQo= From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun Aug 8 14:24:00 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD73D657A9F for ; Sun, 8 Aug 2021 14:24:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kevans@freebsd.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [96.47.72.83]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4GjM0J56w4z4h96 for ; Sun, 8 Aug 2021 14:24:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kevans@freebsd.org) Received: from mail-qv1-f53.google.com (mail-qv1-f53.google.com [209.85.219.53]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) (Authenticated sender: kevans) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 92DAA4F79 for ; Sun, 8 Aug 2021 14:24:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kevans@freebsd.org) Received: by mail-qv1-f53.google.com with SMTP id db14so7661397qvb.10 for ; Sun, 08 Aug 2021 07:24:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5332CjWJknDig8Z4urrII3uccoZkTKnMUtcg8UsZmYrQ1i1OpQnY AX6HYfphLcm67uIs4UMu0ZLdbnX4FVQUt6UNOs4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyAjnCaCbvXQtCEUDfOb4aLcUaLZopAlCOVswIBDMGalCW0rgF7E/w/orhhTwUbt2sN81gORGWhPg1tgwd3wM4= X-Received: by 2002:a0c:e311:: with SMTP id s17mr6764529qvl.39.1628432640316; Sun, 08 Aug 2021 07:24:00 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <610fe5e3.1c69fb81.732e3.890a@mx.google.com> In-Reply-To: <610fe5e3.1c69fb81.732e3.890a@mx.google.com> From: Kyle Evans Date: Sun, 8 Aug 2021 07:23:49 -0700 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: motd service (FreeBSD 13) To: Kira Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Aug 2021 14:24:00 -0000 On Sun, Aug 8, 2021 at 7:10 AM Kira wrote: > 8 =D0=B0=D0=B2=D0=B3. 2021 =D0=B3. 16:12 =D0=BF=D0=BE=D0=BB=D1=8C=D0=B7= =D0=BE=D0=B2=D0=B0=D1=82=D0=B5=D0=BB=D1=8C Nathaniel Nigro =D0=BD=D0=B0=D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=81=D0=B0=D0=BB: > >> Completely agree on that sentiment on the motd =E2=80=9Cservice=E2=80=9D= . Completely >> unnecessary> > So it will sit in memory as a daemon and wait for messages or something? = Is my understanding correct? > If not, then I am ok with changes. > Otherwice it is plain wrong. > Nope, it just generates the motd at boot-time from a template. One time action at boot. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun Aug 8 14:54:43 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E10E657FE4 for ; Sun, 8 Aug 2021 14:54:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@langille.org) Received: from wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.20]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4GjMgk2DSTz4jRL for ; Sun, 8 Aug 2021 14:54:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@langille.org) Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1ABE3200932 for ; Sun, 8 Aug 2021 10:54:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 08 Aug 2021 10:54:35 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=langille.org; h= to:from:subject:message-id:date:mime-version:content-type; s= fm1; bh=UHswWmD53H1goWALjkHHiKB7mZUhwgQaIzBmecT8yHM=; b=dCaQYVxP DTEPECGyzpcdxASY91JW/HkK+1+ffnFsJoB2sFT3g1dJsuqdpVqNac7hLGb26pTt oOmPlcMLibLr4XD9lGUXydfuHaarCuO3GO/uQBbf3A9n3i52jTeN7upGg3i7yICF VC28YZ1Yq6BUR7a5oBx0NpX708kEZtm65jVAtJAARronPTL5Z3DTeLdDHR5WIS7t nx3tMifu6bwaBmAE1Mj/2O52i55XfkUZvl/Twu+mfbFV08g9Uj8V6IhEuQydUj5f SW8kBt57nN+3YIeLohlaVPHt1yHmZZQqXO9IGv2UwMu1+akeAiV8euoYjPPMkEdc uix9CGYsE5QUlA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:message-id :mime-version:subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=UHswWmD53H1goWALjkHHiKB7mZUhw gQaIzBmecT8yHM=; b=PvZ8F84Xj9n/Dd5biBPqEM3wWM7v1NZkBtWIpwzz93J+Y gA1jvcbFg4YuDm31cwKvJWNdZ8y5YLCUqtPxSY8Vajjvpdpr+IJUxTFGt874h4xB aQ0unsynLMv2H2mzdplBZvT84yEr1Jkf2BPqUo0ED+vbAKkYzJWDX0sQkm3PeDSj zUY5pqatt9lIpQWb0Bc8aFik+gEi8nriCDL9mdl+I6HSpSCluAyFXu/O+AaS4M/8 0g8ByZQopRwCjSYsXOjarwzM21bt7gsMZQ4Kksst79D3aRcsLC3OPN+uWSaXX28b CCqJothBgqkLvnGb/0E1bYu5vOsRj6sGXIQnb8psQ== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvtddrjeehgdekvdcutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepvffhuffkffgfgggtsegrtderredtfe ejnecuhfhrohhmpeffrghnucfnrghnghhilhhlvgcuoegurghnsehlrghnghhilhhlvgdr ohhrgheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepfeegkeekffethffhveekieelieekheeigeeuff efteffieefjeegledtfeetleevnecuffhomhgrihhnpehunhhigigrthhhohhmvgdrohhr ghdpphhoshhtsghogidqihhntgdrtghomhenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurf grrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpegurghnsehlrghnghhilhhlvgdrohhrgh X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA for ; Sun, 8 Aug 2021 10:54:34 -0400 (EDT) To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" From: Dan Langille Subject: dma: could not open flush file: Permission denied Message-ID: <6746c30a-53c7-7e84-3840-d2ff692af4a5@langille.org> Date: Sun, 8 Aug 2021 10:54:32 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.16; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 PostboxApp/7.0.48 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Language: en-US X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4GjMgk2DSTz4jRL X-Spamd-Bar: ----- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=langille.org header.s=fm1 header.b=dCaQYVxP; dkim=pass header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm3 header.b=PvZ8F84X; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=langille.org; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of dan@langille.org designates 64.147.123.20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=dan@langille.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-5.10 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:64.147.123.20]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[langille.org:+,messagingengine.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[langille.org,none]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:11403, ipnet:64.147.123.0/24, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[64.147.123.20:from]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[langille.org:s=fm1,messagingengine.com:s=fm3]; FREEFALL_USER(0.00)[dan]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; DWL_DNSWL_LOW(-1.00)[messagingengine.com:dkim]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_ALL(0.00)[]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[64.147.123.20:from]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.34 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Aug 2021 14:54:43 -0000 I recently switched from postfix to dma on some servers which don't need incoming smtp. On 4 of those 6 servers, I'm seeing this nightly: Aug 7 03:02:15 stage-nginx01 dma[dma][79633]: could not open flush file: Permission denied I can't see a difference between the hosts. But I'm sure it's something in periodic daily. Thank you [dan@stage-nginx01:~] $ cat /etc/dma/dma.conf SMARTHOST cliff.int.unixathome.org SECURETRANSFER STARTTLS [dan@stage-nginx01:~] $ cat /etc/mail/mailer.conf sendmail /usr/libexec/dma mailq /usr/libexec/dma newaliases /usr/libexec/dma rmail /usr/libexec/dma [dan@stage-nginx01:~] $ grep mail /etc/rc.conf sendmail_enable="NO" sendmail_submit_enable="NO" sendmail_outbound_enable="NO" sendmail_msp_queue_enable="NO" -- Sent from Postbox From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun Aug 8 15:13:26 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2633865D240 for ; Sun, 8 Aug 2021 15:13:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hruodr@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wr1-x42d.google.com (mail-wr1-x42d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4GjN5J4pHPz4sTB for ; Sun, 8 Aug 2021 15:13:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hruodr@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wr1-x42d.google.com with SMTP id k29so5121160wrd.7 for ; Sun, 08 Aug 2021 08:13:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:message-id:references:mime-version; bh=r74FPE/PXtzrHQUPIK1C2LthmcMlnMCQr6OXCpSS2VA=; b=alAKNlqgcYPMgC3xQ5PMpYKNPBReYzM3/I9/AplKHlRrk4LBzdzZN889ewT31AO8Ev ynDG96i6ivmexUk/6ic85Z4A7g5h/Gm+ZzAM6l3uHWt0sHS9mEgP5x61y17LzlMxdo55 jIoEOHpmHDLi7y4Ij8hFqWhl8DQRoEhZXZPIRbbGs06KVO/Ay8b7akYj+1/MrBlQCG9k /Z3EodUMqH2dZyOh5eWgxZZTJsTI3U3iWTDq07z6jcuLTtD0jqGRhuTR8sJwt9vjs+iB jWRXLyxf+6XM1JT51cDvumFgyguVSP6JUQG/RXhtX/fWsg3bbSEhFeJdyXkbjdhl/TTF HheA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:message-id :references:mime-version; bh=r74FPE/PXtzrHQUPIK1C2LthmcMlnMCQr6OXCpSS2VA=; b=F5E/eWUhguvk3osmNhQi8uJDX01B3JTnVtb2/AMKq9bJsyZYkOOGeSFYeT41mFj+No gST4JOlN+FknDkQ8/Ph0u1+wW1dbck5mgq4ltP23/L/co/mnULAlDfBOiKcutG8IuuRr WAZQu8u7N1eJ7aR/LzfEZsJ+QElFcENJ2/5RhWMN8fRlXNk91tQ7JZMWyrur+CvKbBJS Hc3vOstBrWpvPbe2rLaJGV7R9gW4UrYFqcn4cC+IROQtqtglbU7EuaQiJXt66RhmlBkp fbdJhUVV0/G/r0PM5Q0sPZed8L80uMq0fVZGQuCZJbnq8y48ENoHbMNxNJKGt3qNtQMN 3mDA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533ojhKrL+FyX2T+aFSr8mwrerdS1zkOcr/8SoXNALdp9fuVFvFi yqWabbWVTnxVXrwencZWatXBtDBj98ZazuCP X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyU9PnAXlST3nOYzaKRXHWWb02XCTGIqk1fIBairznV30kLy0oAMo3XleJNO8s8jZc/E5cgCw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:120c:: with SMTP id e12mr3242196wrx.130.1628435601962; Sun, 08 Aug 2021 08:13:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.33.101] (ip5f5bd19c.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de. [95.91.209.156]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o17sm14406194wmp.31.2021.08.08.08.13.21 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 08 Aug 2021 08:13:21 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 8 Aug 2021 15:12:38 +0000 (UTC) From: Roderick To: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: motd service (FreeBSD 13) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <610fe5e3.1c69fb81.732e3.890a@mx.google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4GjN5J4pHPz4sTB X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=alAKNlqg; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of hruodr@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4864:20::42d as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=hruodr@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.02 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a00:1450:4000::/36:c]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2a00:1450::/32, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com:dkim]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.98)[0.977]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2a00:1450:4864:20::42d:from]; RBL_AMI_RCVD_FAIL(0.00)[95.91.209.156:server fail]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Aug 2021 15:13:26 -0000 On Sun, 8 Aug 2021, Kyle Evans wrote: > Nope, it just generates the motd at boot-time from a template. One > time action at boot. And for what did now become necessary to generate a motd from a template? From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun Aug 8 15:32:33 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5D2365F311 for ; Sun, 8 Aug 2021 15:32:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nathaniel.nigro@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lj1-x231.google.com (mail-lj1-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::231]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4GjNWP1GkVz4vBZ for ; Sun, 8 Aug 2021 15:32:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nathaniel.nigro@gmail.com) Received: by mail-lj1-x231.google.com with SMTP id h17so8543390ljh.13 for ; Sun, 08 Aug 2021 08:32:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=E8SdWHFMCgJl5mKeAhvkBDIZcec7V8i4VXpHPU8+QKY=; b=PBW0mHrzFMTYnWTqVigpKWGtp2wH0B2xi0rrTntPT6Hj6Q5vd9FC/fEbCzLoSpp1tc jy5Iur6BqP41MrlRcprY/aO1X1BamgiBerf/mEBJSxnvbdKEMrG6Ur7/QSBSg6VnorS8 oYBztbyb2kFMlDIdWclE6VnO3o7EVy0DNjj2uVUWuzogrnK7Hejpi4dimaPdMCS7WsMq dudpHK0D5r76OW6vYeJOWxJ4LIYI2lzuwB1IYwpoBVkfT8FENyUIiZfV6unZm4vpwvcI 9+5iDjyKsZME0k6ZSn2sgsBGMN4z6mp/SYdqxTgbufloeTYR2YQFGQDE4o1ifZ67XtEn 8oVw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=E8SdWHFMCgJl5mKeAhvkBDIZcec7V8i4VXpHPU8+QKY=; b=FAinfcxqq6X1l4wn9ByaCRZYgHvBgmXOeSSSyhyafjNsRKSOOqCFaUwv1cFqgGwkgw KhLW0hFVKDP4MsqD0RqZ5h1WGD02Bb7p191Tz7TtxL52K5gK/RjUaNvSzyvhlSRkpY8y RJ1lUs3YnRZ1nXRnvQD2kXdmWUd9CIaFcko0ublPo9dqswqgL0msex0TiSUF0EDHxDrI CO6RnJ+kraFTjdE1EeJLju8RfyALoaLGFq7DieILkqLB7aWauvWB05TdvdGSSIJaO5JN tksGtAyCJqm3OBTcv+swdnFc5i+/hJcnevvNtSXAJnwZs46kofFLpMp/sGlFFizRwWuj fBzw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532AqDS2wjTMRBuT+O9e/QCCZGRh7AKK0dC+pv91qlyRO1LdPRCP pTygOux+fyekVoAiXLdWjnrThG+PRT7I8gP+JaBIeD8Ay/s= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxsq5g2ZQ7Y7LTaHkCrThF6MSMK1PbJKcU6uB0OUJW/hzXC2vG7mR7YYd5P0RfTwQBZBrwxqVmzKyUhaTCAtrA= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:b0c8:: with SMTP id g8mr10208284ljl.444.1628436746355; Sun, 08 Aug 2021 08:32:26 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <610fe5e3.1c69fb81.732e3.890a@mx.google.com> In-Reply-To: From: Nathaniel Nigro Date: Sun, 8 Aug 2021 11:32:15 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: motd service (FreeBSD 13) To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4GjNWP1GkVz4vBZ X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=PBW0mHrz; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of nathanielnigro@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4864:20::231 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=nathanielnigro@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a00:1450:4000::/36:c]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROMTLD(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2a00:1450::/32, country:US]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com:dkim]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2a00:1450:4864:20::231:from]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.34 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Aug 2021 15:32:34 -0000 Wasn=E2=80=99t it just fine as just /etc/motd? Why make it a service in /va= r/run? It is confusing and pointless. On Sun, Aug 8, 2021 at 11:14 AM Roderick wrote: > > On Sun, 8 Aug 2021, Kyle Evans wrote: > > > Nope, it just generates the motd at boot-time from a template. One > > time action at boot. > > And for what did now become necessary to generate a motd from a template? > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > --=20 -=3DND=3D- From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun Aug 8 16:49:44 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 562966602A9 for ; Sun, 8 Aug 2021 16:49:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@qeng-ho.org) Received: from mailout.qeng-ho.org (mailout.qeng-ho.org [217.155.128.244]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4GjQDR1Ptwz3FQG for ; Sun, 8 Aug 2021 16:49:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@qeng-ho.org) Received: from arthur.home.qeng-ho.org (unknown [IPv6:2a02:8010:64c9:1::2]) by mailout.qeng-ho.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E198253590; Sun, 8 Aug 2021 17:49:27 +0100 (BST) Subject: Re: motd service (FreeBSD 13) To: Roderick , FreeBSD Mailing List References: <610fe5e3.1c69fb81.732e3.890a@mx.google.com> From: Arthur Chance Message-ID: <6efedfd1-26e3-fd8a-30f2-a9372a3788d1@qeng-ho.org> Date: Sun, 8 Aug 2021 17:49:26 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4GjQDR1Ptwz3FQG X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of freebsd@qeng-ho.org designates 217.155.128.244 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=freebsd@qeng-ho.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.00 / 15.00]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:217.155.128.240/29]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[qeng-ho.org]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.80)[-0.798]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.10)[0.097]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[gmail.com,freebsd.org]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:13037, ipnet:217.155.0.0/16, country:GB]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions]; RBL_AMI_RCVD_FAIL(0.00)[2a02:8010:64c9:1::2:server fail] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Aug 2021 16:49:44 -0000 On 08/08/2021 16:12, Roderick wrote: > > On Sun, 8 Aug 2021, Kyle Evans wrote: > >> Nope, it just generates the motd at boot-time from a template. One >> time action at boot. > > And for what did now become necessary to generate a motd from a template? A wild guess on my part, but maybe this is part of a move to make /etc read only under normal circumstances. I've had various attempts at making jails with the base system read only and the pre-13 in place editing of motd to ensure the first line reflects the current OS doesn't sit well with that. -- Nothing teaches one not to try to stamp out burning thermite quite like real-life experience. — James Davis Nicoll From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun Aug 8 18:04:22 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 775A86612B6 for ; Sun, 8 Aug 2021 18:04:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hruodr@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wm1-x332.google.com (mail-wm1-x332.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::332]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4GjRtY3VVXz3K9l for ; Sun, 8 Aug 2021 18:04:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hruodr@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wm1-x332.google.com with SMTP id o7-20020a05600c5107b0290257f956e02dso12867274wms.1 for ; Sun, 08 Aug 2021 11:04:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:message-id:references:mime-version; bh=vcV3W+XRRi2CTBkql3fxXYySj2+1ijpcFVCNqndAkOs=; b=rx0vf7/8cW+9/5Uvds0PDNa5LXKR/HQ9QlLd63yESsuCh1AYhLQV5Q3LFfSeflwa2H kk51JVMntJWMQDEJER3HFtOfZufTBR2VVSOV3DSki19ej17SF19/8y3D4x93tEycy9eW LDWTaynoZqqms7fyWXf5sRzO6Gld9RDeDhhR0xuLt2XY+tY4I2jLOH43rJXz8+YmKuH3 n3yArTp93Y0jqbEj6cllr4mSMj8b7kJbhdG+WqUZubBlM5DG3t+a71MQYWKXNiGjytH9 cm7/JhII4U3euiptDgpEOnDdcrGk4yKt9JAoc7QXMkkNtfKch6sTxt/HmmGMJVB9eomT VNRA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:message-id :references:mime-version; bh=vcV3W+XRRi2CTBkql3fxXYySj2+1ijpcFVCNqndAkOs=; b=YDbaifWEyP0L9F4zAYKOiQcEQxJbdp0vzrKKO4BrdPGROH0Irq4F+usxrEa1lEMxt7 R0lap2sRWDz45KTyV6QCrUOvCMejHtxoOgO7r1xmznREuaVZbI3Kmkcoq40JK9lfM4t0 6Ui6POBvqWc79V1Sg152v7+DqySPWKUUMnNLAByABdqLfSnnkVkTqCa0v1PtbHv5usCQ +IokIg3tBVTr4pYjlSsCCOn7BuyD4I1xAyUMqQNKCJ7GgsRGNigeMdiI5SZqAhi3euXu JJa1DY1E+gCY5mQ16Tnq0sfMd8FwCZf12wKtFUsQPMa8I3C1aJ49Eb2nqFpTcUXQ73KY v16g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531Q8Kjrjg7HiXg/ifyNfP/X9rHPeTwfGPnFn1VUGujSLA3anU2W Wzbf6xbE5zbwIifF9opCfrwQXESa2EQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzmt4bSGNlLMXBGtUbKYaq8OSndpcc9LYBq3UtLi1yM7LN/I6lnUk1sFwvHbv9sHdVTOSZVPg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:2241:: with SMTP id a1mr30262909wmm.171.1628445860574; Sun, 08 Aug 2021 11:04:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.178.26] (ipservice-092-208-209-246.092.208.pools.vodafone-ip.de. [92.208.209.246]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d9sm6334263wrw.26.2021.08.08.11.04.19 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 08 Aug 2021 11:04:20 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 8 Aug 2021 18:03:33 +0000 (UTC) From: Roderick To: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: motd service (FreeBSD 13) In-Reply-To: <6efedfd1-26e3-fd8a-30f2-a9372a3788d1@qeng-ho.org> Message-ID: References: <610fe5e3.1c69fb81.732e3.890a@mx.google.com> <6efedfd1-26e3-fd8a-30f2-a9372a3788d1@qeng-ho.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4GjRtY3VVXz3K9l X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b="rx0vf7/8"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of hruodr@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4864:20::332 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=hruodr@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.61 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a00:1450:4000::/36:c]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.61)[-0.613]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2a00:1450::/32, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com:dkim]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2a00:1450:4864:20::332:from]; RBL_AMI_RCVD_FAIL(0.00)[92.208.209.246:server fail]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Aug 2021 18:04:22 -0000 On Sun, 8 Aug 2021, Arthur Chance wrote: >> And for what did now become necessary to generate a motd from a template? > > A wild guess on my part, but maybe this is part of a move to make /etc > read only under normal circumstances. I see. Bad design ist "improved" with worse design that not even solve the original problem. Why the hell the system must prepend a line containing the kernel version string during start up?! It should be left to the andmin to add such line to the file (or not add it). And if the system realy must do it, it may show such a line without modyfying motd. R. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun Aug 8 18:46:41 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AA85661CCA for ; Sun, 8 Aug 2021 18:46:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nathaniel.nigro@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lj1-x22b.google.com (mail-lj1-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22b]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4GjSqN3C2Jz3NPt for ; Sun, 8 Aug 2021 18:46:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nathaniel.nigro@gmail.com) Received: by mail-lj1-x22b.google.com with SMTP id y7so9324817ljp.3 for ; Sun, 08 Aug 2021 11:46:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=p15Or3vWwSkNzjRKkouF07imHYI4zwniHh4XXxChGw8=; b=Ou0wSy3IdXcZ3EmNupXn3HmQDUnIEQSyZEwsQ3PE/hFt7C7ZW1L3syul8cEK+d3G5y A0taUO4ZGdf0noGjRYrz6zPtafaYDMBanfHo09PWtCUcRBMiVZFWzsCNJ09c3Uk3Tdji xQMrBdzQQn45Uz3WdRMfyBkW86/+hrK5S2z2bmAyBbAgm2eCjcJ/xIP1cl7s3lsJYXM1 CGKZIjiLzGzNUymz4W8FfZEkPFfvGYjw3Fe/tNsyc2YqmkkvgF4Nnec4HlyNUFc9vczT 0ra5cDn3YR01+dwTn36kuu9z0Ge6WQvRRkwGk5dBUQ0pqEx5oZ4BZRyY75uy+3FGBqrB JNuA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=p15Or3vWwSkNzjRKkouF07imHYI4zwniHh4XXxChGw8=; b=bV5jlhOYj4NP57V8s7YXsRLcWG/SGeM03INS4eYeg818knV81SqBwRwL8blRsK1QzU 0Ax3vtzYjjtEexjkqGSW9ZirBGC5V0C0wB9/1fOq5phvTkslTgCBMo7juKhCoLN01Pmg 27KNtebuIl+JVXYI7DIpEW3NBxxmQC6ZHUNjqBz9iJt3T2htTqiUDbayU6NXelEuRF14 j2IFPdOOgmnLeIR8V9xxR8XrG1A6+CRXWo79ETpDd8ebcFLxgOvMW56dtrAyIAJxNpXv FZN+t0IiEx+dImDDCuYhCUp9IE7fYhONbO9EeKm/y8SRzq+KexlLdL6P3Jx4DJ6ooCDb RGKA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532oPEoGmeH1SsIJUVUuoSqr92A3MJ6Io6X44fh6YqTNbTWrtbc8 71PsPRiFaNZhiS97dpc0QWyiZZVP6kQzksITQnMBHmf6SJE= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxBALPH3T9R0BrryGbwr+gJFs4nJHEfTJ/n97TsPvUo0pt/LCaIbsMssMRNPQImwssK3HYlSXt50BpKi30s1Hk= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9a14:: with SMTP id o20mr1381714lji.321.1628448399080; Sun, 08 Aug 2021 11:46:39 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <610fe5e3.1c69fb81.732e3.890a@mx.google.com> <6efedfd1-26e3-fd8a-30f2-a9372a3788d1@qeng-ho.org> In-Reply-To: From: Nathaniel Nigro Date: Sun, 8 Aug 2021 14:46:28 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: motd service (FreeBSD 13) To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4GjSqN3C2Jz3NPt X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=Ou0wSy3I; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of nathanielnigro@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4864:20::22b as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=nathanielnigro@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a00:1450:4000::/36:c]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROMTLD(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2a00:1450::/32, country:US]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com:dkim]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2a00:1450:4864:20::22b:from]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.34 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Aug 2021 18:46:41 -0000 Not really necessary with file permissions, jails, chflags, And kernel tuning... On Sun, Aug 8, 2021 at 2:04 PM Roderick wrote: > > On Sun, 8 Aug 2021, Arthur Chance wrote: > > >> And for what did now become necessary to generate a motd from a > template? > > > > A wild guess on my part, but maybe this is part of a move to make /etc > > read only under normal circumstances. > > I see. Bad design ist "improved" with worse design that not even solve > the original problem. > > Why the hell the system must prepend a line containing the kernel > version string during start up?! > > It should be left to the andmin to add such line to the file (or not > add it). > > And if the system realy must do it, it may show such a line without > modyfying motd. > > R. > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- -=ND=- From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Aug 9 18:51:00 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71DB265A1A8 for ; Mon, 9 Aug 2021 18:51:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@langille.org) Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Gk4sv55Pwz3JTJ for ; Mon, 9 Aug 2021 18:50:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@langille.org) Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 549FC5C00BD; Mon, 9 Aug 2021 14:50:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: from imap42 ([10.202.2.92]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 09 Aug 2021 14:50:53 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=langille.org; h= mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to:references:date:from:to:cc :subject:content-type; s=fm1; bh=RWxQoDGW1Kun9MMA2fZlDNUnpiR8N8h qPhU+tDxPx3A=; b=gumDql6K0RkxnoYVcB30MP6I0rdqYjtu7oQ8pZmfMvT7SmE TnSkqZLn2Gl69RZr2v9xlh9X+k41VpFbuQaTMzO1kdoCRIRZv3R7JF9WcDkc1RDh mr9+6n4qSeDiHNQwg9dLYz1CU45pou87w3e3kSYuVU1SpVuSdEQLMkMr86C62F4u b2US195p1i+m+wC6CZrW5Dy73MqfpkEqGCijPAzO5nxIdhheOS5Te12nZU+Or1wJ zc389KsZY2ehws5PLs4f1lyTZhtWL/Qd5J8UVl1rAfzmlxn7dLOwPiDyxJlKggTm GfdnN5yf5cDz239I5thm51e8rlsQ7Lot/cH4sYQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=RWxQoD GW1Kun9MMA2fZlDNUnpiR8N8hqPhU+tDxPx3A=; b=uUledEuGJU4RHabnYm7IGY WK9UNNOADSvxqVl67i/kx3rFcl6cjaTzPbWENrIaivVJemIY8s5aNlcL81fYvWEa ehds7iC3HzvoOvD6rW8fpFX1qNGLI24VZ4k9fWwjqc+nqP/VFUZnTSButKDcnvqB KQtah2mOy5zn+ZtDoswkXt3s+Z0YIiPtPJOl08ffPx5NzSdWQFgro19GVEEBXFa3 1Y9HFKphzvnWHSKuBBgk4GJgJS47u/v0BY9YRXUmtZBox80c3h2FySgJ+myV3U7v cBPhvl2rUzE/maJPg05vSuqMENIhQC0jHWwwLw3ezeC5wVnw7gmKxh9IFw6porVA == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvtddrjeejgddufedtucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepofgfggfkjghffffhvffutgesthdtredtreertdenucfhrhhomhepfdffrghn ucfnrghnghhilhhlvgdfuceouggrnheslhgrnhhgihhllhgvrdhorhhgqeenucggtffrrg htthgvrhhnpeffuddvvdefvdegkeekiefhvefgleffkedufeejkeejudeffedujeffheev jeeffeenucffohhmrghinheplhgrnhhgihhllhgvrdhorhhgnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuih iivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepuggrnheslhgrnhhgihhllhgvrdho rhhg X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 222502180068; Mon, 9 Aug 2021 14:50:53 -0400 (EDT) X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.5.0-alpha0-1073-g87597c2717-fm-ubox-20210805.001-g87597c27 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: <3b332fd8-24be-5a2f-15a8-630edb2a7226@gmail.com> <5ff30e22-d355-4a0c-b13b-02ac709f0fbc@www.fastmail.com> Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2021 14:50:32 -0400 From: "Dan Langille" To: "Graham Perrin" Cc: "RW via freebsd-questions" Subject: Re: nvme detached Content-Type: text/plain X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Gk4sv55Pwz3JTJ X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=langille.org header.s=fm1 header.b=gumDql6K; dkim=pass header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm3 header.b=uUledEuG; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=langille.org; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of dan@langille.org designates 66.111.4.29 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=dan@langille.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.09 / 15.00]; XM_UA_NO_VERSION(0.01)[]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:66.111.4.29]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[langille.org:+,messagingengine.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[langille.org,none]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[gmail.com]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[66.111.4.29:from]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:11403, ipnet:66.111.0.0/20, country:US]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[langille.org:s=fm1,messagingengine.com:s=fm3]; FREEFALL_USER(0.00)[dan]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DWL_DNSWL_LOW(-1.00)[messagingengine.com:dkim]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[66.111.4.29:from]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions]; MID_RHS_WWW(0.50)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2021 18:51:00 -0000 On Wed, Aug 4, 2021, at 2:04 PM, Graham Perrin wrote: > On 04/08/2021 18:45, Dan Langille wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 4, 2021, at 1:35 PM, Graham Perrin wrote: > > > >> A normal run of StressDesk might be enough to expose a problem; I > >> recently had a new drive (less than 100 hours' use) that failed > >> consistently after around seven minutes of the run (before filling the > >> file UFS system). > > Is that sysutils/stressdisk? > > Yes, sorry for the typo. stressdisk now underway: Bytes read: 26649996 MByte (1633.90 MByte/s) Bytes written: 235880 MByte ( 491.77 MByte/s) Errors: 0 Elapsed time: 4h40m0.000371674s FYI, it seems my newly arrived NVME is not actually new. * gpart shows a partition. * smarctl says 4 power on hours * 56 power cycles * 104GB written https://dan.langille.org/2021/08/09/i-bought-a-new-nvme-drive-or-did-i/ -- Dan Langille dan@langille.org From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Aug 10 10:30:26 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 165DD666483 for ; Tue, 10 Aug 2021 10:30:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from administrator@freebsd.org) Received: from freebsd.org (pppoe-static.82.209.221.201.telecom.mogilev.by [82.209.221.201]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4GkTjs40hhz3rX2 for ; Tue, 10 Aug 2021 10:30:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from administrator@freebsd.org) From: Microsoft account team To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Warning freebsd-questions@freebsd.org You Have Pending Microsoft Office UNSYNC Messages Date: 10 Aug 2021 13:30:24 +0300 Message-ID: <20210810133024.4D6C8EE69D33FC7B@freebsd.org> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4GkTjs40hhz3rX2 X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.00 / 15.00]; ASN(0.00)[asn:6697, ipnet:82.209.192.0/18, country:BY]; local_wl_from(0.00)[freebsd.org] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.34 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2021 10:30:26 -0000 From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Aug 9 14:31:43 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions+confunsub-23b5093d4271d7c1@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2371655745 for ; Mon, 9 Aug 2021 14:31:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from c@firc.de) Received: from mail.firc.de (mail.firc.de [136.243.131.176]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Gjz6j4bd0z4c2F for ; Mon, 9 Aug 2021 14:31:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from c@firc.de) Received: from firc.de (i5C75830E.versanet.de [92.117.131.14]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature ECDSA (P-384) server-digest SHA384) (No client certificate requested) by mail.firc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E884A1E318 for ; Mon, 9 Aug 2021 16:31:18 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2021 16:31:29 +0200 From: Christoph Lukas To: freebsd-questions+confunsub-23b5093d4271d7c1@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Confirm unsubscribe from freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: Reply-To: Christoph Lukas References: <1628519386-27462-mlmmj-7fc1e463@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1628519386-27462-mlmmj-7fc1e463@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/2.0.6+5 (7c4779ac) (2021-05-03) ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=firc.de; s=arc-2019021802; t=1628519479; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=IIjt/Z/ASfE3Rpg5kxkJC43bw+TvN0lr0TarN+J76+Y=; b=ELoIBWUH+jbAdG/ofbgpJzn+0UFmXjMxbexbDkdxLvQAtxhj8cm7rPLcG+5d5pVFJGU7RJ NmzJd27hJTa5sNRGWvGMP7mHBJlsMVQ/dWr5lmHIgWTOmt7xw8x/VAALk28ZdcmwbhUbjD zf1aqSO7sQaIbtdimh7W9GTkkw5mSvk= ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-2019021802; d=firc.de; t=1628519479; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=IvrWopYvuKE0fcWCLJMG1R46Rv2LUp7rNAKhIsBFelYWwusocn60QAyXW4N26LL6Fasu2v B9bS2HvPE1wGgJOqmiFmM9zXUj0F0URh+6UHjbf1FIMSU+1lhGxGUCJsUPcS+Gfj/Oh4dG Tbsq+vKmwWMev99HF3m0YV3zu4cHukc= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mail.firc.de; auth=pass smtp.auth=c@firc.de smtp.mailfrom=c@firc.de X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Gjz6j4bd0z4c2F X-Spamd-Bar: ----- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-5.00 / 15.00]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[c@firc.de]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[firc.de:s=alpha]; REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[confunsub-23b5093d4271d7c1]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:136.243.131.176]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[firc.de:+]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[firc.de,reject]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; ARC_ALLOW(-1.00)[firc.de:s=arc-2019021802:i=1]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:136.243.0.0/16, country:DE]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions]; RBL_AMI_RCVD_FAIL(0.00)[92.117.131.14:server fail] X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 10 Aug 2021 11:54:12 +0000 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2021 14:31:43 -0000 * freebsd-questions+help@FreeBSD.org [2021-08-09 14:29:46 +0000]: > Hi, this is the Mlmmj program managing the > mailing list. > An administrator has requested that the email address > be removed from the list. > To confirm you want to do this, please send a message to > which can > usually be done simply by replying to this message. The subject and the > body of the message can be anything. > After doing so, you should receive a reply informing you that the operation > succeeded. > If you do not want to do this, simply ignore this message. -- Christoph Lukas c@firc.de https://firc.de/~c/ From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Aug 11 08:50:01 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79F5B6776CA for ; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 08:50:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peo@nethead.se) Received: from ns1.nethead.se (ns1.nethead.se [5.150.237.139]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "ns1.nethead.se", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Gl3RW6YQpz4bqr; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 08:49:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peo@nethead.se) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at Nethead AB DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=nethead.se; s=NETHEADSE; t=1628671791; bh=viHErif0EexZ4ltm8/5NQIy1aL+pWTfKALMv9eC8JMo=; h=Subject:To:References:Cc:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=gNvecCvkCZMEl62B3d8gIoKDXu4dfUIxr02xQMIV9xMq+ssirCVVtS9W9RE63KJ/2 4rvQtTRRm2E6TVP7a8e9ywL05h0PomOVZO07750R2TL9DsxnzTnInJ49Yz2ZTB3q+K XnHsyDLIuI09zHYavH23ypD9AOsn9DCslyv1hbMQ= Subject: Re: Update of OpenLdap To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20210807072442.0000095d@seibercom.net> Cc: FreeBSD , delphij@FreeBSD.org From: Per olof Ljungmark Message-ID: <46245ca6-3f26-5acb-933b-fd8ab864ff30@nethead.se> Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2021 10:49:49 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210807072442.0000095d@seibercom.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Gl3RW6YQpz4bqr X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=nethead.se header.s=NETHEADSE header.b=gNvecCvk; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=nethead.se; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of peo@nethead.se designates 5.150.237.139 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=peo@nethead.se X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[nethead.se:s=NETHEADSE]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:5.150.237.139]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[nethead.se:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[nethead.se,none]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; RCVD_COUNT_ZERO(0.00)[0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:8473, ipnet:5.150.192.0/18, country:SE]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[5.150.237.139:from] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2021 08:50:01 -0000 On 8/7/21 1:24 PM, Jerry Seibert wrote: > FreeBSD 11.4-RELEASE-p9 > > After the recent updating of "openldap", the follow error/warning > message is presented whenever I attempt to access the database. > > Aug 7 07:13:57 scorpio slapd[82175]: OTP unavailable because can't > read/write key database /etc/opiekeys: Permission denied > > Everything works fine so I don't understand what the problem is or how > to correct it, or if it even needs correction. > I have a similar problem and I think the reason is that the openldap24-sasl-client port vanished and was merged into openldap24-client. However, this made one of our ldap slaves stop working, I think this is a showstopper. A switch for this is needed, in the meantime, how do we build the client WITHOUT sasl? 20210801: AFFECTS: users of OpenLDAP AUTHOR: delphij@FreeBSD.org SASL is now always enabled for OpenLDAP. If you use portmaster: portmaster -o net/openldap24-client openldap-sasl-client If you use portupgrade: portupgrade -fo net/openldap24-client openldap-sasl-client If you use pkg with binary packages: pkg set -o net/openldap24-sasl-client:net/openldap24-client From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Aug 11 20:04:57 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2BE865A858 for ; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 20:04:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 93ab.82.c3780004ea8001.476b070d51188e2ce4165d38366bfff4@email-od.com) Received: from s1-b515.socketlabs.email-od.com (s1-b515.socketlabs.email-od.com [142.0.181.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4GlLQJ6N1Lz4T1n for ; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 20:04:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 93ab.82.c3780004ea8001.476b070d51188e2ce4165d38366bfff4@email-od.com) X-Thread-Info: OTNhYi4xMi5jMzc4MDAwNGVhODAwMS5mcmVlYnNkLXF1ZXN0aW9ucz1mcmVlYnNkLm9yZw== Received: from r3.sg.in.socketlabs.com (r3.sg.in.socketlabs.com [142.0.179.13]) by mxh4.email-od.com with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 16:04:47 -0400 Received: from oceanview.tundraware.com (oceanview.tundraware.com [45.55.60.57]) by r3.sg.in.socketlabs.com with ESMTP(version=Tls12 cipher=Aes256 bits=256); Wed, 11 Aug 2021 16:04:46 -0400 Received: from [192.168.0.2] (ozzie.tundraware.com [75.145.138.73]) (authenticated bits=0) by oceanview.tundraware.com (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPSA id 17BK4U32007408 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 15:04:30 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from tundra@tundraware.com) To: FreeBSD Mailing List From: Tim Daneliuk Subject: Can ipfw Rules Be Based On DNS Name Message-ID: Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2021 15:04:24 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.6.4 (oceanview.tundraware.com [45.55.60.57]); Wed, 11 Aug 2021 15:04:30 -0500 (CDT) X-TundraWare-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-TundraWare-MailScanner-ID: 17BK4U32007408 X-TundraWare-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-TundraWare-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam (whitelisted), SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-2.823, required 6, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.00, BAYES_00 -1.90, TW_PF 0.08) X-TundraWare-MailScanner-From: tundra@tundraware.com X-Spam-Status: No X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4GlLQJ6N1Lz4T1n X-Spamd-Bar: - X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.70 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[tundraware.com:s=slkey,email-od.com:s=dkim]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:142.0.176.0/20:c]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[tundraware.com:+,email-od.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[tundraware.com,reject]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[142.0.181.21:from]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[tundra@tundraware.com,93ab.82.c3780004ea8001.476b070d51188e2ce4165d38366bfff4@email-od.com]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:53658, ipnet:142.0.180.0/22, country:US]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[tundra@tundraware.com,93ab.82.c3780004ea8001.476b070d51188e2ce4165d38366bfff4@email-od.com]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[email-od.com:dkim] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2021 20:04:57 -0000 I have used ipfw for years to configure access at the IP address level. I now need to block a particular domain and all its subdomains from accessing anything on the server. Is this possible using the top level domain name rather than IPs (which appear to be fluid). From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Aug 11 20:26:10 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64C4365AADA for ; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 20:26:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kudzu@tenebras.com) Received: from mail-lj1-x234.google.com (mail-lj1-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::234]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4GlLtn4HsNz4TZM for ; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 20:26:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kudzu@tenebras.com) Received: by mail-lj1-x234.google.com with SMTP id h17so6596280ljh.13 for ; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 13:26:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tenebras-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=VwJn9t7W9TJ2ofSzNZ1rGlWYRWlO+HCeT1yc45DZO08=; b=j1LgvWJzo+erOIdu5i0f2q4Y9+3zMoVqDXuIeu9yAft8Uha0SR8G6IkLMsjI2WPeqz VUIhI+S8oSW8qFI0Z3q2PjAypEySHlBjtNO2sYRLjxHzIQIan/1oqLC66nAduwGiA/hy 19AdSDWOCR6RYQFb25zQBvW3H3cTopPzV8um2owCb/pWHpTQLlgSySxO1S//7ByI0E9I GEvT+FLC3qMnbdWX2vZg0W5iYK5dOlqh4tI+LjrOKVPHRLDc7/L2CLAe/3q1i7T8qc3G YMUVh1DC7hvtcP6bP2ayARaW3WmQZ51Kp41g/ShhJZR22aUZSNH3Ij2D0MrnGKd11nZ2 I4nw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=VwJn9t7W9TJ2ofSzNZ1rGlWYRWlO+HCeT1yc45DZO08=; b=eDB6/V/CeBxpiYmlgeAC1DfLJbtqEtG1yVjXjBWyygUTmgeXCrLA6diJVAsOWJAi0r nFlmOWKxPI3EMUcspS20qT8yBTuBHpP6/CeXY4vqJG9vXIrTe9igTRwdXlwntu3eA2Mp BJTDnuWUihGBjBvqwrFAONVQIwOifkD6uRt/oYxp1R39WObzkWlHLaahfvXi21KWic3D 1RjLldPgSwbm4etRHcmBZy2DiX03usubnF9CRLmXl9V5BtviiYoLdjkv3HWK4qEltv4H LRmNGVx93s3Fdy9tQ+/OBCtWtaX1s2hYb6STgS3LKbiFmv+K/5wiJzQk7s/iNj+2Syxb mx7g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532eHKiQumKbV+Xfe+sRziFmphFb9GdmCTAHW6/DgDTgEyO8a/qp cBWl7Bdm7qQs+zb1zcrVp0V2xvpCbJ+Vmj1s+YBBg3ORT7Q7LqPp X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzkp/mz7zFIGZuhgZk/zQ6BOMOShgQU00PaXQxr+WoA8XRgSDj9h7hzw9PsD1yBFhcrhunXnKVMXvUsyBCjA/o= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:995a:: with SMTP id r26mr322095ljj.297.1628713567551; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 13:26:07 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Michael Sierchio Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2021 13:25:31 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Can ipfw Rules Be Based On DNS Name To: FreeBSD Mailing List X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4GlLtn4HsNz4TZM X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=tenebras-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=j1LgvWJz; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of kudzu@tenebras.com has no SPF policy when checking 2a00:1450:4864:20::234) smtp.mailfrom=kudzu@tenebras.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.70 / 15.00]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[tenebras-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com:s=20150623]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(1.00)[0.996]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[tenebras.com]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[tenebras-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com:+]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2a00:1450:4864:20::234:from]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2a00:1450::/32, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.34 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2021 20:26:10 -0000 On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 1:05 PM Tim Daneliuk via freebsd-questions < freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> wrote: > I have used ipfw for years to configure access at the IP address level. > > I now need to block a particular domain and all its subdomains from > accessing anything on the server. Is this possible using the top level > domain name rather than IPs (which appear to be fluid). > Generally, no. Also, specifically, no. There isn't a way of solving the problem as you've articulated it. You can block entire countries by IP block. You can block a company's entire CIDR block if it has one allocated. Tables make this easy. You can create a cron job to do a whois on incoming traffic (if you're loggin it), and block if it's undesireable (add the block to your reject table). If you were concerned with outbound, rather than inbound traffic, I would say sinkhole / blackhole DNS works. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Aug 11 21:30:34 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA6E265BFAD for ; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 21:30:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nathaniel.nigro@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lj1-x22d.google.com (mail-lj1-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4GlNK53lzZz4YDf for ; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 21:30:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nathaniel.nigro@gmail.com) Received: by mail-lj1-x22d.google.com with SMTP id n7so7060195ljq.0 for ; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 14:30:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=4xsrcXv7xrfFyKor9V3lxGuOhbatXXLJGBemgnKxCKY=; b=V/YojHyD2A6GMyFKm5wZRFmTXRq0iRLFKnuyY625lZInrDp3kgeY5AgHvMwpIPInFL BC0/XwJ/dBrvahp8i3foaGLpRtgoR2oYbax38Atnf4rfndaKF3XwFzAGxaDMrg9Mvm2F iH2Ri++cCruX1kMj2U9ReBAp3EsUiFfXs0GAQa1t6daC/U8USQh4P+/xfZqifqRy+oB1 MhmDtzyRrWuaUi+K6MmXdQJ8iA5gGrc3oOItxzkTvGgyyehLRxG+tldHr1D6HMjFM4lb PHnpfDpkkNh2X/FrCpRSQ1P2+nRaK/F2RGIOcvMdvXYmv4thqZlz9eDABpo1ovieSHai jjaw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=4xsrcXv7xrfFyKor9V3lxGuOhbatXXLJGBemgnKxCKY=; b=sw/QM1hfmDV/t3YRDluHnzT5ViqYqwbCPihveyBo8I4uC4iy5+mLWO/3RRlgMWK4/w DmXtqeWthYU25umc/sPCLrGlr0hN2tfo8WVOFbfyXKVp43sVcOrEkkbRcpbpUu9cgUyS 9QEsTdqyw2iOjIi69E5R40xDg90DUK1T2Z1gIoFq1iJid0MedVfAVXUWldASXxPf5Etr 7SrkTpu4RPK/D4lnzj9LADzIpI1Zlu231rLpeRfv4F/GBw4FcdHdKPKEmySKjR7Z5fis WLmJ4H8cPkA48DjMmHLIQSqWH2tLTVHAhqKBUiN7IGEO27fuKt5OgkV+/eIsfeMaX5Tv 7M4g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530+RdE6uviT0tZlAUqIInB9W9PM7aQ9ttV2Z3RyA1HV7peAKD8S +WHIMDgjesdE2k/az0OUxaIJbT85UVXrOGZPeCqfvRfWXew= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx/8KY8dSBJbRAC16p30dMbSTpfj/qbHs5phCBptrCJYgpyOYbUMKF5aMHbJrPD8ZUzDLXlhZ2X2UlYT/O5Mjo= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:a223:: with SMTP id i3mr490157ljm.185.1628717431493; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 14:30:31 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Nathaniel Nigro Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2021 17:30:20 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Can ipfw Rules Be Based On DNS Name To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4GlNK53lzZz4YDf X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b="V/YojHyD"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of nathanielnigro@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4864:20::22d as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=nathanielnigro@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.30 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com:dkim]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a00:1450:4000::/36:c]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROMTLD(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2a00:1450:4864:20::22d:from]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.30)[-0.302]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2a00:1450::/32, country:US]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.34 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2021 21:30:34 -0000 /etc/hosts.allow? On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 4:05 PM Tim Daneliuk via freebsd-questions < freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> wrote: > I have used ipfw for years to configure access at the IP address level. > > I now need to block a particular domain and all its subdomains from > accessing anything on the server. Is this possible using the top level > domain name rather than IPs (which appear to be fluid). > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- -=ND=- From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Aug 11 21:43:28 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D414665C8E7 for ; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 21:43:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 93ab.82.c3780004f05f39.85ee17d392e6b2b22d92057e0dce243c@email-od.com) Received: from s1-b515.socketlabs.email-od.com (s1-b515.socketlabs.email-od.com [142.0.181.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4GlNbz72N8z4ZWy for ; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 21:43:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 93ab.82.c3780004f05f39.85ee17d392e6b2b22d92057e0dce243c@email-od.com) X-Thread-Info: OTNhYi4xMi5jMzc4MDAwNGYwNWYzOS5mcmVlYnNkLXF1ZXN0aW9ucz1mcmVlYnNkLm9yZw== Received: from r2.us-east-1.aws.in.socketlabs.com (r2.us-east-1.aws.in.socketlabs.com [142.0.191.2]) by mxh4.email-od.com with ESMTP(version=Tls12 cipher=Aes256 bits=256); Wed, 11 Aug 2021 17:43:23 -0400 Received: from oceanview.tundraware.com (oceanview.tundraware.com [45.55.60.57]) by r2.us-east-1.aws.in.socketlabs.com with ESMTP(version=Tls12 cipher=Aes256 bits=256); Wed, 11 Aug 2021 17:43:22 -0400 Received: from [192.168.0.2] (ozzie.tundraware.com [75.145.138.73]) (authenticated bits=0) by oceanview.tundraware.com (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPSA id 17BLhB63008967 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 16:43:11 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from tundra@tundraware.com) Subject: Re: Can ipfw Rules Be Based On DNS Name To: FreeBSD Mailing List References: From: Tim Daneliuk Message-ID: <43c8bac1-9b19-4ad9-0968-17abdcd73785@tundraware.com> Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2021 16:43:06 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.6.4 (oceanview.tundraware.com [45.55.60.57]); Wed, 11 Aug 2021 16:43:11 -0500 (CDT) X-TundraWare-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-TundraWare-MailScanner-ID: 17BLhB63008967 X-TundraWare-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-TundraWare-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam (whitelisted), SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-2.824, required 6, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.00, BAYES_00 -1.90, NICE_REPLY_A -0.00, TW_PF 0.08) X-TundraWare-MailScanner-From: tundra@tundraware.com X-Spam-Status: No X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4GlNbz72N8z4ZWy X-Spamd-Bar: - X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.70 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[tundraware.com:s=slkey,email-od.com:s=dkim]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:142.0.176.0/20]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[tundraware.com:+,email-od.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[tundraware.com,reject]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[142.0.181.21:from,142.0.191.2:received]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[tundra@tundraware.com,93ab.82.c3780004f05f39.85ee17d392e6b2b22d92057e0dce243c@email-od.com]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:53658, ipnet:142.0.180.0/22, country:US]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[tundra@tundraware.com,93ab.82.c3780004f05f39.85ee17d392e6b2b22d92057e0dce243c@email-od.com]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[email-od.com:dkim] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2021 21:43:28 -0000 On 8/11/21 4:30 PM, Nathaniel Nigro wrote: > /etc/hosts.allow? Hmmmm and interesting possibility, actually. Thanks! -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Tim Daneliuk tundra@tundraware.com PGP Key: http://www.tundraware.com/PGP/ From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Aug 11 21:48:54 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C44765C6DA for ; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 21:48:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 93ab.82.c3780004f0822d.143d081f78222e09257f343089255f6b@email-od.com) Received: from s1-b515.socketlabs.email-od.com (s1-b515.socketlabs.email-od.com [142.0.181.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4GlNkF2lqZz4ZYW for ; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 21:48:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 93ab.82.c3780004f0822d.143d081f78222e09257f343089255f6b@email-od.com) X-Thread-Info: OTNhYi4xMi5jMzc4MDAwNGYwODIyZC5mcmVlYnNkLXF1ZXN0aW9ucz1mcmVlYnNkLm9yZw== Received: from r2.us-east-1.aws.in.socketlabs.com (r2.us-east-1.aws.in.socketlabs.com [142.0.191.2]) by mxh4.email-od.com with ESMTP(version=Tls12 cipher=Aes256 bits=256); Wed, 11 Aug 2021 17:48:44 -0400 Received: from oceanview.tundraware.com (oceanview.tundraware.com [45.55.60.57]) by r2.us-east-1.aws.in.socketlabs.com with ESMTP(version=Tls12 cipher=Aes256 bits=256); Wed, 11 Aug 2021 17:48:44 -0400 Received: from [192.168.0.2] (ozzie.tundraware.com [75.145.138.73]) (authenticated bits=0) by oceanview.tundraware.com (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPSA id 17BLmOZS009099 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 16:48:24 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from tundra@tundraware.com) Subject: Re: Can ipfw Rules Be Based On DNS Name To: FreeBSD Mailing List References: <43c8bac1-9b19-4ad9-0968-17abdcd73785@tundraware.com> From: Tim Daneliuk Message-ID: Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2021 16:48:19 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <43c8bac1-9b19-4ad9-0968-17abdcd73785@tundraware.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.6.4 (oceanview.tundraware.com [45.55.60.57]); Wed, 11 Aug 2021 16:48:24 -0500 (CDT) X-TundraWare-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-TundraWare-MailScanner-ID: 17BLmOZS009099 X-TundraWare-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-TundraWare-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam (whitelisted), SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-2.824, required 6, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.00, BAYES_00 -1.90, NICE_REPLY_A -0.00, TW_PF 0.08) X-TundraWare-MailScanner-From: tundra@tundraware.com X-Spam-Status: No X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4GlNkF2lqZz4ZYW X-Spamd-Bar: - X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.70 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[tundraware.com:s=slkey,email-od.com:s=dkim]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:142.0.176.0/20:c]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[tundraware.com:+,email-od.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[tundraware.com,reject]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[142.0.181.21:from,142.0.191.2:received]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[tundra@tundraware.com,93ab.82.c3780004f0822d.143d081f78222e09257f343089255f6b@email-od.com]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:53658, ipnet:142.0.180.0/22, country:US]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[tundra@tundraware.com,93ab.82.c3780004f0822d.143d081f78222e09257f343089255f6b@email-od.com]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[email-od.com:dkim] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2021 21:48:54 -0000 On 8/11/21 4:43 PM, Tim Daneliuk via freebsd-questions wrote: > On 8/11/21 4:30 PM, Nathaniel Nigro wrote: >> /etc/hosts.allow? > > > Hmmmm and interesting possibility, actually. Thanks! > > Well, actually, that's not going to work because host.allow is for TCP based connections and I'm already blocking everything from everywhere. DNS uses UDP for query/replies. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Aug 11 21:57:04 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BFC365CAE3 for ; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 21:57:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from galtsev@kicp.uchicago.edu) Received: from kicp.uchicago.edu (kicp.uchicago.edu [128.135.20.70]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4GlNvg3Cqmz4c7W for ; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 21:57:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from galtsev@kicp.uchicago.edu) Received: from point.uchicago.edu (point.uchicago.edu [128.135.52.6]) (Authenticated sender: galtsev) by kicp.uchicago.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 17AD24E47D for ; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 16:56:57 -0500 (CDT) Subject: Re: Can ipfw Rules Be Based On DNS Name To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <43c8bac1-9b19-4ad9-0968-17abdcd73785@tundraware.com> From: Valeri Galtsev Message-ID: Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2021 16:56:56 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.12.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4GlNvg3Cqmz4c7W X-Spamd-Bar: + Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=fail reason="No valid SPF, No valid DKIM" header.from=uchicago.edu (policy=none); spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of galtsev@kicp.uchicago.edu has no SPF policy when checking 128.135.20.70) smtp.mailfrom=galtsev@kicp.uchicago.edu X-Spamd-Result: default: False [1.10 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(1.00)[1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; RCVD_NO_TLS_LAST(0.10)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:160, ipnet:128.135.0.0/16, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions]; DMARC_POLICY_SOFTFAIL(0.10)[uchicago.edu : No valid SPF, No valid DKIM,none] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2021 21:57:04 -0000 On 8/11/21 4:48 PM, Tim Daneliuk via freebsd-questions wrote: > On 8/11/21 4:43 PM, Tim Daneliuk via freebsd-questions wrote: >> On 8/11/21 4:30 PM, Nathaniel Nigro wrote: >>> /etc/hosts.allow? >> >> >> Hmmmm and interesting possibility, actually. Thanks! >> >> > > Well, actually, that's not going to work because host.allow is for TCP > based connections and I'm already blocking everything from everywhere. > DNS uses UDP for query/replies. When I'm really annoyed by some domain that hides behind service showing it with different IPs all the time (cloudflare pops up in my mind, but I may be wrong), then I do whois [current domain's ip] which reveals me whoever is hiding that domain, and all blocks of IPs owned by them, Then I add to blocking table in ipfw all their address ranges. The one whom I learned it from said: if you block some good people, hm, they need to know who they are in company with, and leave for better company... Valeri PS I had to abandon ipfw, and switch over to pf, but that is different story. -- ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Valeri Galtsev Sr System Administrator Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics University of Chicago Phone: 773-702-4247 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Aug 11 23:23:37 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC0C065E747 for ; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 23:23:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kremels@kreme.com) Received: from mail.covisp.net (mail.covisp.net [65.121.55.42]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4GlQqX5h4Bz4jpZ for ; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 23:23:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kremels@kreme.com) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: Port 111 (rpcbind) From: "@lbutlr" In-Reply-To: <469A3125-4B72-40E9-8796-7511DA8ADBFF@kreme.com> Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2021 17:23:30 -0600 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <9FF634A7-DC16-4D38-AD5E-5190CF304AA8@kreme.com> References: <9E9E62BA-5930-49C1-81B5-773352932729@kreme.com> <160770c8-b18b-7832-cb88-dcc15bd023e0@gmail.com> <610C571A.503@gmail.com> <469A3125-4B72-40E9-8796-7511DA8ADBFF@kreme.com> To: FreeBSD X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3686.0.1.2.1) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4GlQqX5h4Bz4jpZ X-Spamd-Bar: ++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of kremels@kreme.com designates 65.121.55.42 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=kremels@kreme.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [2.60 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; MISSING_MIME_VERSION(2.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[kreme.com]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(1.00)[1.000]; RCVD_COUNT_ZERO(0.00)[0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:209, ipnet:65.112.0.0/12, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[65.121.55.42:from] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2021 23:23:37 -0000 On 2021 Aug 05, at 16:21, @lbutlr wrote: > For now I have simply stopped rpcbind and disabled it in rc.conf. = Nothing has blown up yet. When my machine restarted, rpcbin was started on boot, despite the = rc.conf line being commented out: ~ # grep rpc /etc/rc.conf #rpcbind_enable=3D"YES" How do I track down what started it? --=20 "Are you pondering what I'm pondering?" "I think so, Brain, but I am running for mayor of Donkeytown and Tuesdays are booked." =46rom an early Kids' WB intro. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Aug 11 23:38:03 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6B7165F08D for ; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 23:38:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nathaniel.nigro@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lj1-x22d.google.com (mail-lj1-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4GlR8B6Dnzz4kGD for ; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 23:38:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nathaniel.nigro@gmail.com) Received: by mail-lj1-x22d.google.com with SMTP id x9so7523809ljj.2 for ; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 16:38:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=SgTPOZ2CKaF8ua4CoikbQKXniG/X1RsKWVTA4pDeW58=; b=LadNxeFoYGzN2Ogp9jWY7CxozsljLzYukj8+3YVKAHC5vkLn/Z4DrercEJZFpZ0Xdn 4tWer4jxMW7ljm+fMYhVbe+jyScgUYV9W4ynthlEfMZfiqA3ElT8E1kbv8aMUKVzFPWU 15QSHl09qX6EtXFdJ2VlFCZiJ+L+RLtoyUptIHvyawtzTVAw+tQcYEyvrUYZvf/MOLX0 /8wfJRl17RVp5iD2L0Ciclfa0IZ5Mw2Xteb3N6lkRSOGx0UPBV0qLqwdKNJzOgscplln DAHB7ls0lUcu70jaercEWakwm0U3W4zqZCckHuVdQZhtDCItZVh324WHCdvd8D5NNf8y eaHQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=SgTPOZ2CKaF8ua4CoikbQKXniG/X1RsKWVTA4pDeW58=; b=ocX1RefScUpXz39bFeOKlK6nIg/AdC9S1kWKPBgTMYtovZjL6Cnz1TK4CyYiPH4spo KyYZYYJqFt55z2mfVkPhK0wt1qo5sDo0lxDE1TQ4dgGMTHYJtKBqoPLWD8B6l4YZ5Rnn AaglBAim/bIbcFF6wvWxML7VCuWbKFf/XQCW15vkwyuGXOF/3svdxqCTCxgdMMF7qeCu fwfr5hkKwZZcxccu2vipBkXhIdmKTrND6WbR4VSB2AiutR7SSsBIU3se0uEA71bJof45 Qkems9eVam8BsBFYZ4ZS32vFMpcLS35kgJ5yqamWbDIfygjmGnZ8PO0B0edevFP+P/5i CxiA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532jpuCNNSLROQCd4YTaLnfY+Z+vXaUO0dX8qP9EYbl8H2dC0vLt anU4J1r98LN9TxNX3C5MrBGLX0OZQJ2+533Zhy0qTQHgVWA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz65fBh9gT7o1KrrunWipnoCk3uN8g2j+fInPNenTfsD4uJbj8Swgs5uAQZOY6k/nVGtd4FIyQ0RaACJRa8JRg= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9a5a:: with SMTP id k26mr829981ljj.150.1628725080540; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 16:38:00 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Nathaniel Nigro Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2021 19:37:48 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Can ipfw Rules Be Based On DNS Name To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4GlR8B6Dnzz4kGD X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=LadNxeFo; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of nathanielnigro@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4864:20::22d as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=nathanielnigro@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.12 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com:dkim]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a00:1450:4000::/36:c]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.88)[0.876]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROMTLD(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2a00:1450:4864:20::22d:from]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2a00:1450::/32, country:US]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.34 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2021 23:38:03 -0000 Ipfw -q add 111 deny udp from (domain) to any(or local ip) (port) in via (interface) keep-state Doesn=E2=80=99t work? On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 4:05 PM Tim Daneliuk via freebsd-questions < freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> wrote: > I have used ipfw for years to configure access at the IP address level. > > I now need to block a particular domain and all its subdomains from > accessing anything on the server. Is this possible using the top level > domain name rather than IPs (which appear to be fluid). > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > --=20 -=3DND=3D- From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Aug 12 00:18:59 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A113165F993 for ; Thu, 12 Aug 2021 00:18:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 93ab.82.c3780004f3b59d.f3388889c30598f3aa25a5101d7bd660@email-od.com) Received: from s1-b515.socketlabs.email-od.com (s1-b515.socketlabs.email-od.com [142.0.181.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4GlS3Q2krDz4m6D for ; Thu, 12 Aug 2021 00:18:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 93ab.82.c3780004f3b59d.f3388889c30598f3aa25a5101d7bd660@email-od.com) X-Thread-Info: OTNhYi4xMi5jMzc4MDAwNGYzYjU5ZC5mcmVlYnNkLXF1ZXN0aW9ucz1mcmVlYnNkLm9yZw== Received: from r4.h.in.socketlabs.com (s1-b40f.socketlabs.email-od.com [142.0.180.15]) by mxh4.email-od.com with ESMTP(version=Tls12 cipher=Aes256 bits=256); Wed, 11 Aug 2021 20:18:40 -0400 Received: from oceanview.tundraware.com (oceanview.tundraware.com [45.55.60.57]) by r4.h.in.socketlabs.com with ESMTP(version=Tls12 cipher=Aes256 bits=256); Wed, 11 Aug 2021 20:18:40 -0400 Received: from [192.168.0.2] (ozzie.tundraware.com [75.145.138.73]) (authenticated bits=0) by oceanview.tundraware.com (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPSA id 17C0ITqa011223 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 19:18:29 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from tundra@tundraware.com) Subject: Re: Can ipfw Rules Be Based On DNS Name To: FreeBSD Mailing List References: From: Tim Daneliuk Message-ID: <07064513-2e56-d4f7-54aa-8a7d12755402@tundraware.com> Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2021 19:18:24 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.6.4 (oceanview.tundraware.com [45.55.60.57]); Wed, 11 Aug 2021 19:18:29 -0500 (CDT) X-TundraWare-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-TundraWare-MailScanner-ID: 17C0ITqa011223 X-TundraWare-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-TundraWare-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam (whitelisted), SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-2.824, required 6, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.00, BAYES_00 -1.90, NICE_REPLY_A -0.00, TW_PF 0.08) X-TundraWare-MailScanner-From: tundra@tundraware.com X-Spam-Status: No X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4GlS3Q2krDz4m6D X-Spamd-Bar: - X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.70 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[tundraware.com:s=slkey,email-od.com:s=dkim]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:142.0.176.0/20]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[tundraware.com:+,email-od.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[tundraware.com,reject]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[142.0.181.21:from]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[tundra@tundraware.com,93ab.82.c3780004f3b59d.f3388889c30598f3aa25a5101d7bd660@email-od.com]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:53658, ipnet:142.0.180.0/22, country:US]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[tundra@tundraware.com,93ab.82.c3780004f3b59d.f3388889c30598f3aa25a5101d7bd660@email-od.com]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[email-od.com:dkim] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2021 00:18:59 -0000 On 8/11/21 6:37 PM, Nathaniel Nigro wrote: > Ipfw -q add 111 deny udp from (domain) to any(or local ip) (port) in via > (interface) keep-state Doesn’t work? Not the way I want. At the time the rule is applied, (domain) is resolved and replaced with a single IP address. I want to block everything coming from any IP in that domain. Or ... so I thought ... what is actually going on the deeper I look is that the various scammer/spammer/sleazebags are representing themselves as legitimate domain, hoping to forward their DNS requests through our servers. We have that tightened down so these get rejected, but it does make our logs very noisy: 11-Aug-2021 14:17:10.819 security: info: client @0x8032b3b60 51.89.223.6#55252 (pizzaseo.com): view external: query (cache) 'pizzaseo.co m/RRSIG/IN' denied I know of no way to stop this since these requests come from a large, and unpredictable set of IPs. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Aug 12 00:20:45 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0AC765FE8A for ; Thu, 12 Aug 2021 00:20:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kudzu@tenebras.com) Received: from mail-lf1-x129.google.com (mail-lf1-x129.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::129]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4GlS5S6SVBz4mLT for ; Thu, 12 Aug 2021 00:20:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kudzu@tenebras.com) Received: by mail-lf1-x129.google.com with SMTP id y34so9680172lfa.8 for ; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 17:20:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tenebras-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=wWLuVn6SuGgE4nSnwhfSpaq17s0Fx/+VBLb/8JkRDPY=; b=TgXadHCH+Q4Th+Mjb15knGrBZ1hUo8+njmBlYMIUTlTHgSmM2SaZdKMZBz5CL7u2mz 3cI1isfO82epgR7P5fgGU7aL4keZmqLqjLjJeA6690gDKQmRryOafGiQVfvv+ZqdeCtf cYvaLF/PVnA385SB8jtPonXaR9mnJbHBbqlp84quijsP7UbwdBpQ+v1aglZYYBPo98sH bDRVbmf+PaJaUWfoBAydPXBPHeQPpNqT+nbHPM30f5yEgI3ajlFcTeGmi32juDF8fX+6 Cv9nBc0tr9Xr4xlojG1Ti0h9cLYAwbg/7p69PgM2IHkiVX0oFtV5fwxvl6ic35KOGXu8 CShQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=wWLuVn6SuGgE4nSnwhfSpaq17s0Fx/+VBLb/8JkRDPY=; b=FrsIEO1PdORtVDFvOFHjzovEfQj9kWcn8sntaoOgNd8dYwcNtiOffqaaQQeNTxmMJZ thX5dMZ5wkRlg40pdcUVDPax5h+StT5wTkvQUKGhY9X7RQo2LyYNm+Sf6r9uWghFybQA /GLCdPoBPbxGQ2Au9fyxrRl7dxpSS3HUtQSMAOURKnuvcye2CFRz+smnmj1HGCyFAJHz Z+SFnsCmia2mfWs7djBoWOTZWl1MbkMIjWJw1ICBQBlWKWbN7xxb2H5xdHShyWr/Aksf wwGdWtwRlBwvyQ3pKN9EJTSn4eMtY/FaYEr8nmKJNq6SqDgjei/b1tQxU8dzwH8Yro+3 Sfwg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5327rs49Fp1k9E5nV5UHLFFOHAUvS9lgOt4sYXYhVvCrtAvxj7a1 m4qdPLIWhLjxjw9rBTzeXx8sp9CAv2eQy83pSET7Pw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz7Dlgqwffl3gAbW9m1G78ramFjTRj01CNN+Q0Qy86ZCRLVZrrtul3M2fG53NXe2AJBItw9/W/FFl1ye3k1HdQ= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:1390:: with SMTP id p16mr514855lfa.39.1628727643364; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 17:20:43 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Michael Sierchio Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2021 17:20:07 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Can ipfw Rules Be Based On DNS Name To: Nathaniel Nigro Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4GlS5S6SVBz4mLT X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=tenebras-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=TgXadHCH; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of kudzu@tenebras.com has no SPF policy when checking 2a00:1450:4864:20::129) smtp.mailfrom=kudzu@tenebras.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.50 / 15.00]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_SOME(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[tenebras-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com:s=20150623]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.80)[0.802]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[tenebras.com]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[tenebras-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2a00:1450:4864:20::129:from]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[gmail.com]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2a00:1450::/32, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.34 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2021 00:20:45 -0000 On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 4:38 PM Nathaniel Nigro wrote: > Ipfw -q add 111 deny udp from (domain) to any(or local ip) (port) in via > No. You can add a rule for a FQDN, but that's only resolved at the time you add the rule. It's just an IP address in the firewall ruleset. You can maintain a table of addresses, and check that with a single rule. You can add and delete CIDR blocks and IPv6 prefixes without changing the ruleset or restarting the firewall. How you might do that is a non-trivial problem. How do you find all the IP addresses associated with a particular domain? From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Aug 12 00:27:06 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEE1965FDC3 for ; Thu, 12 Aug 2021 00:27:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nathaniel.nigro@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ot1-x334.google.com (mail-ot1-x334.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::334]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4GlSDn5KRsz4mmC for ; Thu, 12 Aug 2021 00:27:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nathaniel.nigro@gmail.com) Received: by mail-ot1-x334.google.com with SMTP id r19-20020a0568301353b029050aa53c3801so5630716otq.2 for ; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 17:27:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=9tS6A9CcMLqhbMIUO+lzFjYbiP5BHdNLOjfnynfWdKo=; b=Bhdj2PvLIghwD0pyzfs/m8luWCRmhf/m9W+KEouAoDpnEp6x6k0ZEn50J+NSgOmjKY 1XPm3TEuP+SLbWiiXanJxHZQtZ2kwGKaECRjP/R5DzLP5DlPVmwdO3gR62SpxuYh/6wR UkM9Ja4azxYOdqBA4JT8+9QrHbcr16CiyalrLRAUpjQqIggldkw6YkBwlQXL/D9ZdMIl nWCG5JP9uMrpvND5wk6QOeRkpTJcjlSt8EQHY40elwW44CSM7T48oWsV44wIUno9UHys al8lg/IT99vZyuMzcJJrg2/zqInj9v4EhmoJ3zveX//W+iF0HUAm3nL4RUsVU1X6NwPR 590A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=9tS6A9CcMLqhbMIUO+lzFjYbiP5BHdNLOjfnynfWdKo=; b=R9vTmkU8V6dWWybV4GZ+aeFbEQ8DZBckuCgHA9ckjE18x8ReVdhdJe5MR0mHe8swcH WUmwXiG5wSkCXXMKEeZ+gEAAaIeSDMTOY/Etpvta/9mnM27JZvxVte6EmfuNWPKetEsR HwAkVwOofC3ijQ3o9vLV0eQEct/XY9bDCVU6P5Vdyg/FUHRLC9kGHa+AzF6DIXujP9mJ UuZcQK0R9nSuoSjo++PGS5jqFlzwXWwiqoCpf/Qw7/AEHZ2vuIiKis9SqnioKolrDSe1 eHnJfqKPviyXJG8Xs1qMbGPXDcO+mfFNE2Zpnif5PdkPWyaOVqTDO1EpQZ+3zgGZ9vMS shFg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531/PbvO40ybbdKRLx+/TlqqwAIpNp4p/HW7LF1IjaUZJnuN0dZp gdMxma0iwZGR/IS/JGQj7PFrhOCajwPULSK+NFUEOxEz1Vg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzPiHf1t6KRCTnenFPmaPlyOrcWUmfXboSV2k6+Z9JwIDd7p5jSaHU3iUZx/aVdxfXV6zmfV7gVa2Iyg8VTqgA= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:3191:: with SMTP id p17mr1270332ots.150.1628728025003; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 17:27:05 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Nathaniel Nigro Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2021 20:26:53 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Can ipfw Rules Be Based On DNS Name To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4GlSDn5KRsz4mmC X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=Bhdj2PvL; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of nathanielnigro@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::334 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=nathanielnigro@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.13 / 15.00]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com:dkim]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.87)[0.875]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROMTLD(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::334:from]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.34 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2021 00:27:06 -0000 It was just a suggestion, I didn=E2=80=99t know this was coming from a rang= e of different ip addresses on the same domain. Is there any consistency ? Can you use a range?/subnet? On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 4:05 PM Tim Daneliuk via freebsd-questions < freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> wrote: > I have used ipfw for years to configure access at the IP address level. > > I now need to block a particular domain and all its subdomains from > accessing anything on the server. Is this possible using the top level > domain name rather than IPs (which appear to be fluid). > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > --=20 -=3DND=3D- From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Aug 12 00:33:18 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 227AD66031F for ; Thu, 12 Aug 2021 00:33:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nathaniel.nigro@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lj1-x234.google.com (mail-lj1-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::234]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4GlSMx2kQlz4mbr for ; Thu, 12 Aug 2021 00:33:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nathaniel.nigro@gmail.com) Received: by mail-lj1-x234.google.com with SMTP id h17so7630123ljh.13 for ; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 17:33:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=noKKA9OJZP91WSijk37NnWXKSwU6C6jzYzy+IkHrTyA=; b=pj2eg/S3DpYEdHGN0Wg3AjPnxVZ6ieFi+j0Z02UatWfhxzHYvmkZSOzVPq/kWteLCq cY/D/vNnJJjPQP0gy0nktnUSBvbSoj3F1186oqC9D4m/ryvs3iK/jhRqzHziu3fsgHiJ rV8ZIpSYKMuUtyedEsq4aOUsN56/1Iy3k/WGfGQevns1P7u/e0X1XrxD5+5Y9r9thieD XdbBbuMuyIaUgygBXFdnZEcJcyrpa8P8zosegdg55stvnMaGzX3gUZsugzaoDwH04/a2 EB/qrjnmlA8SrBVfecAr1JhF3vKdDTtwJlitPaSFpHGxKlO0wpO9WLnivaPVjCUUwHHD tmEw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=noKKA9OJZP91WSijk37NnWXKSwU6C6jzYzy+IkHrTyA=; b=ETmzGWm1ZTNVsypqsWRwASYddIze4X9FIERNjE4ZReSD6SaxZHeQgDXPw5xLrScC89 9AI4NGQi6b+5Ay/O9n4kl3Gao2OwnvrzEccf5WuqKG990m3PNd3R7tYTHFmIrm2yHBlY e5pVYojul/BK2a2T7PWFBS/enE21/qnaaT27l9lyKDwtr96tV3mDmzIzyRgS4W8li6u4 EZkb3a1xEbDp25eGTQB1OF9ldo94nrQTnbzU91ILZxYsAF5hFrIOmQYDwhgVg+dGNW4A bz2zBsCKGEw4jLEq9kNlUGcUdItyxfoX3O2WsN4Hvs9VNVJGxrWViIM05dWgaWdlwfZ+ nNNQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531xxY+xfXIC54VuuePwXDJIaV37t74Jfbv6qrbhj0SsmQq709U6 UV/FgWbYVhqu4/ePxoEE161dGs57NelXh/JvaE0801/sYN4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzOUR1I00og86KILT/UgmMbpemrDDEfdkmRDf2d6H9E6poODnTIqe2kV8F10kfi3Ys1KlPVm66DbdCmx0eI9Is= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9a5a:: with SMTP id k26mr960985ljj.150.1628728395838; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 17:33:15 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Nathaniel Nigro Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2021 20:33:04 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Can ipfw Rules Be Based On DNS Name To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4GlSMx2kQlz4mbr X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b="pj2eg/S3"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of nathanielnigro@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4864:20::234 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=nathanielnigro@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.16 / 15.00]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com:dkim]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.84)[0.842]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROMTLD(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a00:1450:4000::/36]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2a00:1450:4864:20::234:from]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2a00:1450::/32, country:US]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.34 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2021 00:33:18 -0000 If not, I might be out if suggestions:/ On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 8:26 PM Nathaniel Nigro wrote: > It was just a suggestion, I didn=E2=80=99t know this was coming from a ra= nge of > different ip addresses on the same domain. Is there any consistency ? > Can you use a range?/subnet? > > On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 4:05 PM Tim Daneliuk via freebsd-questions < > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> wrote: > >> I have used ipfw for years to configure access at the IP address level. >> >> I now need to block a particular domain and all its subdomains from >> accessing anything on the server. Is this possible using the top level >> domain name rather than IPs (which appear to be fluid). >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to " >> freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > -- > -=3DND=3D- > --=20 -=3DND=3D- From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Aug 12 01:11:19 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 351DA660A22 for ; Thu, 12 Aug 2021 01:11:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from postmaster@gate-pro.live) Received: from cp3.gate-pro.live (cp3.gate-pro.live [198.23.211.181]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4GlTCn6VHGz4qMV for ; Thu, 12 Aug 2021 01:11:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from postmaster@gate-pro.live) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding; i=administrator@freebsd.org; bh=yuv8FEJeqwMNeu/uzT3YKs7MpnmdJkudogM4UKKDEQ8=; b=gQeYOk3lxQeikXPHs3CrYuVApFVL7GMH+ssfjAuAlWYhqK6zc992EajVmxNs+4vzbi+iM7R0/XAs yYbxG9Fy4S19izclgMPYCVw0m0VUIq32tgxug3ji0b2ABtoKayLNVkBa7X/HVJcpsuDlghuvlfVB 4N5w363N+lZnXAJUoDw= From: freebsd.org To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Account authentication for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: 12 Aug 2021 01:49:33 +0100 Message-ID: <20210812014933.BE205C8223C55FB4@freebsd.org> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4GlTCn6VHGz4qMV X-Spamd-Bar: +++++++++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=freebsd.org header.s=dkim header.b=gQeYOk3l; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of postmaster@gate-pro.live designates 198.23.211.181 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=postmaster@gate-pro.live X-Spamd-Result: default: False [9.10 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FREEFALL_USER(0.00)[postmaster]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(0.00)[+ip4:198.23.211.181:c]; R_DKIM_REJECT(1.00)[freebsd.org:s=dkim]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; BAD_REP_POLICIES(0.10)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[freebsd.org:-]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; URIBL_AMI_BLACK(6.50)[brontesdomesticdivaz.com.au:url]; MIME_HTML_ONLY(0.20)[]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[administrator@freebsd.org,postmaster@gate-pro.live]; RCVD_COUNT_ZERO(0.00)[0]; GREYLIST(0.00)[pass,body]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:~]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(1.00)[1.000]; ASN(0.00)[asn:36352, ipnet:198.23.208.0/22, country:US]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[administrator@freebsd.org,postmaster@gate-pro.live]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions]; TO_DOM_EQ_FROM_DOM(0.00)[] X-Spam: Yes MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.34 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2021 01:11:19 -0000 From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Aug 12 08:37:35 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35E3D6666D6 for ; Thu, 12 Aug 2021 08:37:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from parv.0zero9@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wm1-x335.google.com (mail-wm1-x335.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::335]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Glg6k5Lt8z4RPf for ; Thu, 12 Aug 2021 08:37:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from parv.0zero9@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wm1-x335.google.com with SMTP id k4so3878833wms.3 for ; Thu, 12 Aug 2021 01:37:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=P9GxRsVGNtUAZkTUoywrKH/xzqdlcOg27qN5VR0+4VM=; b=Oiq2jvulkXTV2LKOdAQ2VsXMhdCUX7EVLCNJ4TQH9+wF1AQFWkMh7kJWH4RDPsA0l1 7rc5Pmr5xq3Vq3dF+3luAJFYNJpz42uYDQVaG45aYt+7v1qReZZEehATYOH4U+fTESAT ybyNBVrUHXr3Y9oozPorbd28HzwfDeMco7XkZcv3AHCJKgku9o2UK++wrCMo5m01moLy VP9/II7Bb3p+jTdjb0CGBObUgC3R+WnE/sB6QuziT8gVtQ0QkSebAw1pC32Mc+aKCToD 9UmMeIA798m3/aciZGYWO2Zh5EN1CRgRUtpxE6Ey+xx+vYftDfCx9NMoIXg/JgC6/Vpn DnXw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=P9GxRsVGNtUAZkTUoywrKH/xzqdlcOg27qN5VR0+4VM=; b=uSLXrebFNfgNRDzkWw3kUDlC1JoPMJe4vBBOKha2lp9iLQyaiEjwgAwMEpu7riRNOS 9Z1pBXALsBgWYwhFzSKfpIJ0F3q1Ti9sA2k4TlDZxzFhruh3rCwJQDjzYvSSDvcrIkk3 jSBTk97jgvOXzrkUXH6ObOGOFWQoFV6xkVvTU1D8gUZeTqVd8pNNL7OI+szbeDHd6OYz V+PT4aFSKReJPf1yb+yRB5Car4VO9zZT2Ky1D7EP6wM7fORFP8fz5lFeqlsHI3Gl6IM6 Ym35DwuteA2rK5l6ELiuKh5JC83V7r/h4C+DDuynPaquyev4LcTYa9GxmQlSjEK1j7Tr 5VJg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533zkbf32IIfbbfHlOf48QiyOtT71vf+AsI+Q4hlqmQY20g52J+n GYgGYzU2w6GwsGYolHd+WU39C+phQdembpN7yP4zOOGX1mE= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw1J1Dkv71iFDAdx5OhLCFpSvhrRwaP3km2e84i4ENBefXzv1AWQ84XRy1yMAp979cqATXENraqIkOiMz1qES0= X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:5c2:: with SMTP id p2mr14212193wmd.188.1628757453704; Thu, 12 Aug 2021 01:37:33 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: "parv/freebsd" Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2021 22:36:44 -1000 Message-ID: Subject: pkg-search - Querying the non-default repository (not for installing packages) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Glg6k5Lt8z4RPf X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=Oiq2jvul; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of parv0zero9@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4864:20::335 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=parv0zero9@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.99 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com:dkim]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a00:1450:4000::/36:c]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; URI_COUNT_ODD(1.00)[1]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROMTLD(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2a00:1450:4864:20::335:from]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.99)[0.994]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2a00:1450::/32, country:US]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[freebsd]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.34 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2021 08:37:35 -0000 Hi there, I use "latest" repository via default "/etc/pkg/FreeBSD.conf" to install packages on FreeBSD 13-STABLE. To be able to search quarterly branch via "pkg-search -r" (able to supply a reponame even if not active per its manual page), I copied that file to "/usr/local/etc/pkg/repos/quarter.conf" ... quarter: { url: "pkg+http://pkg.FreeBSD.org/${ABI}/quarterly", mirror_type: "srv", signature_type: "fingerprints", fingerprints: "/usr/share/keys/pkg", enabled: no, priority: 0 } ... but "pkg search -r quarter curl" does not work when "enabled: no". Is that not how package search supposed to work for a repository that is not active? - parv From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Aug 12 08:55:27 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 068B6667654 for ; Thu, 12 Aug 2021 08:55:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from parv.0zero9@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wr1-x434.google.com (mail-wr1-x434.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::434]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4GlgWL2D3sz4T4S for ; Thu, 12 Aug 2021 08:55:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from parv.0zero9@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wr1-x434.google.com with SMTP id r6so7202269wrt.4 for ; Thu, 12 Aug 2021 01:55:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=fN8+NZFS1FxPnpA2RwA9qG9Z/KF+jkgLNDOgvdUoBIg=; b=aBaa9zEsAidnx2NywyfZSnmcp7iCSFtpSZlS3MH9Bc8Pt95OzYt3HVK7o3Glf7lV/W eOWijpAYtSKjuy1l0OX92AkRWUiiPBm76jkzgt9o5aOx0nlmQgJ+fAkQ1Ybd0+rATCat YzJW2ntcrmrXbrGU0Y9up8fCU3zM6PcF1J31zDf/f5Qg9XO1Y/umeGVIYKjal8OTaZQB Ua+6TxHRTcKTH3NMbzKdjxdLIjvykRyuyEGjgof3DIkq1A3JNB/JMa71mV9kDTNEk7XI yRR2HQKWKkCmJJIEM6lkC8t9eEMbWtPa9ttci4dr5hIbKHTZGPAxxM9cSS1PsOdexSAq jo1A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=fN8+NZFS1FxPnpA2RwA9qG9Z/KF+jkgLNDOgvdUoBIg=; b=t/st22SXtCZKBxjYrb1KkcZFYAraTkrlSbXsOYEo0nn4aeoNtJWE0RQdGMM+p/dEO+ YULyi+QXOka07vfa5KAno8psbGLx2VzyO3HC8GS+qoGtYDB8cRonnLVDdQBNrRvEx7XF WgZ4j/iCXFeNfCOE6u9h5Zcdn0mZq0mxU1comnoe9Rni9Sj7/VIVgaYZtImhslUVJnAh prUh+nIu1gou4RoCANilEe36wKiJMQGXgl/xN3/69/KATSHRMw046IUHJcdWkqMOJU/T YHispASFaRq9qhgyh22pbc9oTCAWuMF4pWoqSkLl+7xCC6sDJ7KkrmKFoUCLwDmhjS3y bvfQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533+u39AFp7/EDew86DbKVlAj83qRqW+i0mxtfFDgjKyFINFo34m Jh6QdhHn/DFtgHzDhxd9q3iwR0PINv/9vmOKc5Xj6yRIajA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz0gR035sus+2yK0JnhCPgWuJ1JOy1b5F9BEPB5F53u/SOws2+Mh0jPhism9qoo6jZCBxTdAUN89M7MQ/9Wf9o= X-Received: by 2002:adf:dd92:: with SMTP id x18mr2773222wrl.123.1628758519646; Thu, 12 Aug 2021 01:55:19 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: "parv/freebsd" Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2021 22:54:29 -1000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: pkg-search - Querying the non-default repository (not for installing packages) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4GlgWL2D3sz4T4S X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=aBaa9zEs; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of parv0zero9@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4864:20::434 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=parv0zero9@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.99 / 15.00]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com:dkim]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; URI_COUNT_ODD(1.00)[1]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROMTLD(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a00:1450:4000::/36]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2a00:1450:4864:20::434:from]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.99)[0.993]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2a00:1450::/32, country:US]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[freebsd]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.34 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2021 08:55:27 -0000 On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 10:36 PM parv/freebsd wrote: > I use "latest" repository via default "/etc/pkg/FreeBSD.conf" to install > packages on FreeBSD 13-STABLE. To be able to search quarterly branch via > "pkg-search -r" (able to supply a reponame even if not active per its > manual > page), I copied that file to "/usr/local/etc/pkg/repos/quarter.conf" ... > > quarter: { > url: "pkg+http://pkg.FreeBSD.org/${ABI}/quarterly", > mirror_type: "srv", > signature_type: "fingerprints", > fingerprints: "/usr/share/keys/pkg", > enabled: no, > priority: 0 > } > > ... but "pkg search -r quarter curl" does not work when "enabled: no". > > Is that not how package search supposed to work for a repository that is not active? > > Turns about I misread the manual page of pkg-search: "active" is actually a keyword, missing from "/etc/pkg/FreeBSD.conf". So after I have set to "no" -- "active: no" -- & set "enabled: yes", I was able to do the above query. On to create find the right URL for 12-RELEASE for a pair of configuration files ... - parv From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Aug 12 09:04:06 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06AAA6685DD for ; Thu, 12 Aug 2021 09:04:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from parv.0zero9@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wm1-x330.google.com (mail-wm1-x330.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::330]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4GlgjK2c0jz4Tdp for ; Thu, 12 Aug 2021 09:04:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from parv.0zero9@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wm1-x330.google.com with SMTP id f9-20020a05600c1549b029025b0f5d8c6cso6525672wmg.4 for ; Thu, 12 Aug 2021 02:04:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=olQW+K6SAtCT1XSiMKAUXu1Ivv3y5SfGBcDUAQtpM1I=; b=kuQyaHaqaLg9yXwZk/eLVEG2iIKFOwUp4Q8TXGg15xB5JCL9aZ8U//9s85I/yUI+ZH 2Ldi+yn5KEq4mfjQ691mqiPlz0u0cxrwg6ok4pzwysez8tI1S1HQzUOZaofcdLgIFJTA G2Sjj1MB6aA293CZQrsuFBdLeMAcF+ObetrmGzP1hGvAUFfTQkbl3uOB82RAqB3F0d0L 3J2Z+vgX8e3sTUOfYPhNZf9niJzD1Adll4V6zaa4COVNG1dQtg4vyhGu6vTx+gdKDy3c tvd5Wp5WQAZw5HUQC98X9BbhF3wkp8D9XM+IqSWM1LM/PRFKynexKhsid8yovtmFtuPX zd/w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=olQW+K6SAtCT1XSiMKAUXu1Ivv3y5SfGBcDUAQtpM1I=; b=cZHueUY8ByWXoj8SJRaY+AyO7XJFYmUXwSIrj7p0iswkEkbZwvgVu3yJDcuSuC4Q4m pNhWcqt9JXKO3mKccjHg4BV13N0R7oi3FuLTB0q1WosYOUZS3qPcQeIOGpkcsGT8UHbh 7byk14GbqW3AaXuitdC3yrsSm14tH8CFcv3+tqb3R9wPuUaE6Ow5pKDNsylqxrfTcSSx 3GmzyQEEuF/+uGv/t+xlDYuyAYuTupvWRlDPA9kenjp3DbfY8dF/LLYzs9cwMYSA8Tl3 qhz9MeVHn3FfCPATcThED9JWlQ50oZKSWfX3++K1eKohlyDp8f6gh9w883/fWQKtQnSG SNFw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530RTdYn963A3Q0nK0HUJr5YNFk7L2fcV51w4emMHQjar4ZGfqaP Wq7q3zQsjnGYoRGoxm0R2ur2eE62LP4+3jfqYcyt3C3u6NY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy9StNg6zyuegEtLLRWSH+equY2DRHIF0qhwFNxKBYMB0v1riXph30KE/hf1XFwplhVVQjLcvG/7kwl63uws0s= X-Received: by 2002:a1c:f713:: with SMTP id v19mr2836998wmh.188.1628759037907; Thu, 12 Aug 2021 02:03:57 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: "parv/freebsd" Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2021 23:03:08 -1000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: pkg-search - Querying the non-default repository (not for installing packages) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4GlgjK2c0jz4Tdp X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=kuQyaHaq; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of parv0zero9@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4864:20::330 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=parv0zero9@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [1.00 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com:dkim]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a00:1450:4000::/36:c]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; URI_COUNT_ODD(1.00)[1]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROMTLD(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2a00:1450:4864:20::330:from]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(1.00)[1.000]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2a00:1450::/32, country:US]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[freebsd]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.34 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2021 09:04:06 -0000 On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 10:54 PM parv/freebsd wrote: > On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 10:36 PM parv/freebsd wrote: > >> I use "latest" repository via default "/etc/pkg/FreeBSD.conf" to install >> packages on FreeBSD 13-STABLE. To be able to search quarterly branch via >> "pkg-search -r" (able to supply a reponame even if not active per its >> manual >> page), I copied that file to "/usr/local/etc/pkg/repos/quarter.conf" ... >> >> quarter: { >> url: "pkg+http://pkg.FreeBSD.org/${ABI}/quarterly", >> mirror_type: "srv", >> signature_type: "fingerprints", >> fingerprints: "/usr/share/keys/pkg", >> enabled: no, >> priority: 0 >> } >> >> ... but "pkg search -r quarter curl" does not work when "enabled: no". >> >> Is that not how package search supposed to work for a repository that is not active? >> >> > Turns about I misread the manual page of pkg-search: "active" is actually > a keyword, > missing from "/etc/pkg/FreeBSD.conf". So after I have set to "no" -- > "active: no" -- > & set "enabled: yes", I was able to do the above query. > That is not it. 8-[ Now the issue is "pkg search curl" returns result from both default & "quarter" repositories. How does one set a repository to be non-active such that unless it is given, then pkg command would not use it by default? - parv From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Aug 12 10:15:34 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3467C668CF7 for ; Thu, 12 Aug 2021 10:15:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from noreply-support@freebsd.org) Received: from freebsd.org (pppoe-static.82.209.221.201.telecom.mogilev.by [82.209.221.201]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4GljHn4yDkz4Zp7 for ; Thu, 12 Aug 2021 10:15:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from noreply-support@freebsd.org) From: Mailbox Support Team To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Mail Account Upgrade Date: 12 Aug 2021 13:15:33 +0300 Message-ID: <20210812131533.76C0A65E7A9213EB@freebsd.org> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4GljHn4yDkz4Zp7 X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.00 / 15.00]; ASN(0.00)[asn:6697, ipnet:82.209.192.0/18, country:BY]; local_wl_from(0.00)[freebsd.org] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.34 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2021 10:15:34 -0000 From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Aug 12 14:04:25 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1443866CAC6 for ; Thu, 12 Aug 2021 14:04:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from merlyn@geeks.org) Received: from mail.geeks.org (jacobs.geeks.org [204.153.247.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4GlpMr0KwZz4pJS for ; Thu, 12 Aug 2021 14:04:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from merlyn@geeks.org) Received: from mail.geeks.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by after-clamsmtpd.geeks.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E277173DF for ; Thu, 12 Aug 2021 09:04:17 -0500 (CDT) Received: by mail.geeks.org (Postfix, from userid 1003) id 829E5173DE; Thu, 12 Aug 2021 09:04:17 -0500 (CDT) Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2021 09:04:17 -0500 From: Doug McIntyre To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Can ipfw Rules Be Based On DNS Name Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4GlpMr0KwZz4pJS X-Spamd-Bar: + Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of merlyn@geeks.org designates 204.153.247.1 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=merlyn@geeks.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [1.69 / 15.00]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ptr]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(1.00)[1.000]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[geeks.org]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.99)[0.993]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7753, ipnet:204.153.244.0/22, country:US]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2021 14:04:25 -0000 On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 05:20:07PM -0700, Michael Sierchio wrote: > You can maintain a table of addresses, and check that with a single rule. > You can add and delete CIDR blocks and IPv6 prefixes without changing the > ruleset or restarting the firewall. How you might do that is a non-trivial > problem. How do you find all the IP addresses associated with a particular > domain? That's what I've done in the past, created a table referenced in IPFW, then some sort of process that periodically checks the domain name resolution, and updates the table if the IP addresses change. Obviously, you are going to need to know what set of names they will be coming from. It is unlikely that somebody would be coming from *.lab.domain.com, its probably going to be much more likely to be from some small set of DNS entries. This is the way commercial firewalls work too. If you setup a policy in a Fortigate based on FQDN, it will only periodically go through and update the IP addresses based on FQDNs. There could be a period where the refresh procedure hasn't kicked off yet, and somebody connects after a DNS update. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Aug 12 16:54:39 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A2C666F29C for ; Thu, 12 Aug 2021 16:54:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lumiwa@dismail.de) Received: from mx1.dismail.de (mx1.dismail.de [78.46.223.134]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA512 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mx1.dismail.de", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Glt8G0Rwvz3Hbn for ; Thu, 12 Aug 2021 16:54:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lumiwa@dismail.de) Received: from mx1.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 573f7950 for ; Thu, 12 Aug 2021 18:54:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp1.dismail.de ( [10.240.26.11]) by mx1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id cc05950c for ; Thu, 12 Aug 2021 18:54:28 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp1.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 657c859d for ; Thu, 12 Aug 2021 18:54:28 +0200 (CEST) Received: by dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 7e5ac931 (TLSv1.3:AEAD-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO) for ; Thu, 12 Aug 2021 18:54:27 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2021 12:54:24 -0400 From: LuMiWa To: FreeBSD Questions Subject: pkg lock Message-ID: <20210812125424.47ab3bb9@dismail.de> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.18.0 (GTK+ 2.24.33; amd64-portbld-freebsd13.0) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Glt8G0Rwvz3Hbn X-Spamd-Bar: ---- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.10 / 15.00]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:78.46.223.134]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[dismail.de:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[dismail.de,reject]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:78.46.0.0/15, country:DE]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[78.46.223.134:from]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[dismail.de:s=20190914]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; DWL_DNSWL_LOW(-1.00)[dismail.de:dkim]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2021 16:54:39 -0000 Hi! I am using binary packages (latest) on FreeBSD 13.0-RELEASE. I have 8 applications where I have my own settings. Is it correct when I built the and install that I should use "pkg lock name" of port/package, please? Or is something other. Thank you. --=20 "Everyone thinks of changing the world, but no one thinks of changing himself.=E2=80=9D Leo Tolstoy From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Aug 12 17:11:16 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9A5466F8EB for ; Thu, 12 Aug 2021 17:11:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from galtsev@kicp.uchicago.edu) Received: from kicp.uchicago.edu (kicp.uchicago.edu [128.135.20.70]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4GltWS080xz3JrL for ; Thu, 12 Aug 2021 17:11:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from galtsev@kicp.uchicago.edu) Received: from point.uchicago.edu (point.uchicago.edu [128.135.52.6]) (Authenticated sender: galtsev) by kicp.uchicago.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AB7454E477 for ; Thu, 12 Aug 2021 12:11:15 -0500 (CDT) Subject: Re: pkg lock To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20210812125424.47ab3bb9@dismail.de> From: Valeri Galtsev Message-ID: Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2021 12:11:15 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.12.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210812125424.47ab3bb9@dismail.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4GltWS080xz3JrL X-Spamd-Bar: ++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=fail reason="No valid SPF, No valid DKIM" header.from=uchicago.edu (policy=none); spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of galtsev@kicp.uchicago.edu has no SPF policy when checking 128.135.20.70) smtp.mailfrom=galtsev@kicp.uchicago.edu X-Spamd-Result: default: False [2.09 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.99)[0.990]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(1.00)[1.000]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; RCVD_NO_TLS_LAST(0.10)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:160, ipnet:128.135.0.0/16, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions]; DMARC_POLICY_SOFTFAIL(0.10)[uchicago.edu : No valid SPF, No valid DKIM,none] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2021 17:11:16 -0000 On 8/12/21 11:54 AM, LuMiWa via freebsd-questions wrote: > Hi! > > I am using binary packages (latest) on FreeBSD 13.0-RELEASE. > I have 8 applications where I have my own settings. Is it correct when > I built the and install that I should use "pkg lock name" of > port/package, please? Or is something other. > If you build your own packages with custom settings using poudriere, then somewhere in: /usr/local/etc/pkg/repos/ you will have pointer to your poudriere repository. Then, poudriere repository's supplied .pkg will take precedence over central FreeBSD repository's one, unless poudriere has older than FreeBSD repository version of package. This is the advantage of using poudriere. If you just build port, you do need to lock these packages, and their dependencies affected by your custom config. I'm sure there are experts who do it this way who will provide better guidance for this case. Valeri > Thank you. > -- ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Valeri Galtsev Sr System Administrator Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics University of Chicago Phone: 773-702-4247 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Aug 12 17:17:06 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5093666FCB2 for ; Thu, 12 Aug 2021 17:17:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lumiwa@dismail.de) Received: from mx1.dismail.de (mx1.dismail.de [78.46.223.134]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA512 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mx1.dismail.de", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Gltf92WcXz3KTG for ; Thu, 12 Aug 2021 17:17:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lumiwa@dismail.de) Received: from mx1.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 7cfd445d; Thu, 12 Aug 2021 19:17:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp2.dismail.de ( [10.240.26.12]) by mx1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id ccafa578; Thu, 12 Aug 2021 19:17:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp2.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp2.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id de216c42; Thu, 12 Aug 2021 19:17:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: by dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 22acb307 (TLSv1.3:AEAD-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO); Thu, 12 Aug 2021 19:17:02 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2021 13:17:00 -0400 From: LuMiWa To: Valeri Galtsev Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pkg lock Message-ID: <20210812131700.61659f72@dismail.de> In-Reply-To: References: <20210812125424.47ab3bb9@dismail.de> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.18.0 (GTK+ 2.24.33; amd64-portbld-freebsd13.0) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Gltf92WcXz3KTG X-Spamd-Bar: ---- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.10 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[dismail.de:s=20190914]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:78.46.223.134:c]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DWL_DNSWL_LOW(-1.00)[dismail.de:dkim]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[dismail.de:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[dismail.de,reject]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:78.46.0.0/15, country:DE]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[78.46.223.134:from] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2021 17:17:06 -0000 On Thu, 12 Aug 2021 12:11:15 -0500 Valeri Galtsev wrote: >=20 >=20 > On 8/12/21 11:54 AM, LuMiWa via freebsd-questions wrote: > > Hi! > >=20 > > I am using binary packages (latest) on FreeBSD 13.0-RELEASE. > > I have 8 applications where I have my own settings. Is it correct > > when I built the and install that I should use "pkg lock name" of > > port/package, please? Or is something other. > >=20 >=20 > If you build your own packages with custom settings using poudriere,=20 > then somewhere in: /usr/local/etc/pkg/repos/ you will have pointer to=20 > your poudriere repository. Then, poudriere repository's supplied .pkg=20 > will take precedence over central FreeBSD repository's one, unless=20 > poudriere has older than FreeBSD repository version of package. This > is the advantage of using poudriere. >=20 > If you just build port, you do need to lock these packages, and their=20 > dependencies affected by your custom config. I'm sure there are > experts who do it this way who will provide better guidance for this > case. >=20 > Valeri >=20 > > Thank you. > >=20 >=20 Thank you. I lock packages because I do not want to build on my machine anymore. --=20 "Everyone thinks of changing the world, but no one thinks of changing himself.=E2=80=9D Leo Tolstoy From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Aug 12 19:44:34 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05048671C05 for ; Thu, 12 Aug 2021 19:44:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@boosten.org) Received: from smtpq2.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net (smtpq2.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net [212.54.42.165]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4GlxwJ6khdz3kpB for ; Thu, 12 Aug 2021 19:44:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@boosten.org) Received: from [212.54.42.106] (helo=smtp2.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net) by smtpq2.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mEGcr-0002N3-3Q for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 12 Aug 2021 21:44:25 +0200 Received: from smtp.boosten.org ([84.25.247.31]) by smtp2.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net with ESMTP id EGcqm1Sr420j5EGcqmPqRR; Thu, 12 Aug 2021 21:44:24 +0200 X-Env-Mailfrom: freebsd@boosten.org X-Env-Rcptto: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-SourceIP: 84.25.247.31 X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.4 cv=TYT1CTch c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=61157a19 cx=a_exe a=JWBJsaPp29SgP5DpYRBqZw==:117 a=JWBJsaPp29SgP5DpYRBqZw==:17 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=MhDmnRu9jo8A:10 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=5fa5iZYveEtXJHSNtlUA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=IjZwj45LgO3ly-622nXo:22 Received: from mailserver.boosten.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.boosten.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 583EE52FEA; Thu, 12 Aug 2021 21:44:23 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at boosten.org Received: from smtpclient.apple (iphone-peter.boosten.org [192.168.13.34]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.boosten.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D723752FE8; Thu, 12 Aug 2021 21:44:17 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 smtp.boosten.org D723752FE8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: Peter Boosten Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Subject: Re: pkg lock Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2021 21:44:16 +0200 Message-Id: References: <20210812125424.47ab3bb9@dismail.de> Cc: FreeBSD Questions In-Reply-To: <20210812125424.47ab3bb9@dismail.de> To: LuMiWa X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (18G82) X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4xfGCmePCzRiLOfsCp6DgHUKUiLyyiQRmrjlAxMw0W4D5L/3KTi+Rw52wFX87h6wvEfiNNDcdiLC9bjonXv3b0QJOr/icykPlOyCm8eituyjJ5mUBnHB74 IVatgISLwZXcTo1Q3gKrVQ1W0d1BYWyYxELxrhOttJJDscxNkHIcnoeTz6bel5Rm/0jm6paifv9Lr4s3fAwq2LJSU7qKl/eQHuFP3k/lzYLrQ/sfMYIoNlYd X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4GlxwJ6khdz3kpB X-Spamd-Bar: -- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.60 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[boosten.org:s=myselector]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_GOOD(0.00)[212.54.42.165:from]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:212.54.32.0/19]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[84.25.247.31:received]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[boosten.org:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[boosten.org,reject]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:33915, ipnet:212.54.32.0/20, country:NL]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[212.54.42.165:from] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2021 19:44:34 -0000 > On 12 Aug 2021, at 18:54, LuMiWa via freebsd-questions wrote: >=20 > =EF=BB=BFHi! >=20 > I am using binary packages (latest) on FreeBSD 13.0-RELEASE. > I have 8 applications where I have my own settings. Is it correct when > I built the and install that I should use "pkg lock name" of > port/package, please? Or is something other. >=20 >=20 Yes, that=E2=80=99s the way to go, assuming you build from ports. I have sev= eral ports that require different setting (postfix and dovecot eith mysql de= pendency) and a pkg ipgrade would overwrite them with default packages.=20 Peter= From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Aug 12 21:25:03 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1557E672F2B for ; Thu, 12 Aug 2021 21:25:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lumiwa@dismail.de) Received: from mx1.dismail.de (mx1.dismail.de [78.46.223.134]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA512 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mx1.dismail.de", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Gm08G077wz3srF for ; Thu, 12 Aug 2021 21:25:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lumiwa@dismail.de) Received: from mx1.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 4fb0d729; Thu, 12 Aug 2021 23:24:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp1.dismail.de ( [10.240.26.11]) by mx1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 944129ee; Thu, 12 Aug 2021 23:24:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp1.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 0ce89f51; Thu, 12 Aug 2021 23:24:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: by dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id f7fd23ba (TLSv1.3:AEAD-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO); Thu, 12 Aug 2021 23:24:58 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2021 17:24:55 -0400 From: LuMiWa To: Peter Boosten via freebsd-questions Cc: Peter Boosten Subject: Re: pkg lock Message-ID: <20210812172455.2f3f614f@dismail.de> In-Reply-To: References: <20210812125424.47ab3bb9@dismail.de> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.18.0 (GTK+ 2.24.33; amd64-portbld-freebsd13.0) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Gm08G077wz3srF X-Spamd-Bar: ---- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.10 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[dismail.de:s=20190914]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:78.46.223.134]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DWL_DNSWL_LOW(-1.00)[dismail.de:dkim]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[dismail.de:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[dismail.de,reject]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:78.46.0.0/15, country:DE]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[78.46.223.134:from] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2021 21:25:03 -0000 On Thu, 12 Aug 2021 21:44:16 +0200 Peter Boosten via freebsd-questions wrote: >=20 >=20 > > On 12 Aug 2021, at 18:54, LuMiWa via freebsd-questions > > wrote: > >=20 > > =EF=BB=BFHi! > >=20 > > I am using binary packages (latest) on FreeBSD 13.0-RELEASE. > > I have 8 applications where I have my own settings. Is it correct > > when I built the and install that I should use "pkg lock name" of > > port/package, please? Or is something other. > >=20 > >=20 >=20 > Yes, that=E2=80=99s the way to go, assuming you build from ports. I have > several ports that require different setting (postfix and dovecot > eith mysql dependency) and a pkg ipgrade would overwrite them with > default packages.=20 >=20 > Peter Thank you. Looks like I am doing correct :). --=20 "Everyone thinks of changing the world, but no one thinks of changing himself.=E2=80=9D Leo Tolstoy From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Aug 13 02:05:46 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F193676508 for ; Fri, 13 Aug 2021 02:05:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zarniwhoop@ntlworld.com) Received: from smtpq1.tb.ukmail.iss.as9143.net (smtpq1.tb.ukmail.iss.as9143.net [212.54.57.96]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Gm6N94hhMz4cCg for ; Fri, 13 Aug 2021 02:05:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zarniwhoop@ntlworld.com) Received: from [212.54.57.108] (helo=csmtp4.tb.ukmail.iss.as9143.net) by smtpq1.tb.ukmail.iss.as9143.net with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mEMZm-0005R5-51 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 13 Aug 2021 04:05:38 +0200 Received: from llamedos.mydomain ([81.97.236.130]) by cmsmtp with ESMTPA id EMZlmBkRpXATfEMZmmZcrp; Fri, 13 Aug 2021 04:05:38 +0200 X-Originating-IP: [81.97.236.130] X-Authenticated-Sender: zarniwhoop@ntlworld.com X-Authority: v=2.4 cv=MaEPB7zf c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=6115d372 cx=a_exe a=OGiDJHazYrvzwCbh7ZIPzQ==:117 a=OGiDJHazYrvzwCbh7ZIPzQ==:17 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=MhDmnRu9jo8A:10 a=uGfl48vc2SFhAOzTW8YA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 Received: by llamedos.mydomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 39ED588628; Fri, 13 Aug 2021 03:05:37 +0100 (BST) Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2021 03:05:37 +0100 From: Ken Moffat To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Applying patches to a folder Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/2.1.1 (2021-07-12) X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4xfPGXdjHucsqhsgcJPpPA6MZlqgpdBi1IONWuzzDToprhQ9HIWo4I+iaj5Oa2Z9h1R9zgDlFkzbk2OZCvUmApxRwVrWvIt/LAr5F2kZwIj7Mcoutb6dRp /PT4F3MLqpFJHVdfqHvO3pO/0dk4bgeyPD18+5Bx4MVVp7rF//BeEpiNw2yCAEoEKUj69DafQAuQAGwG/ksARSA2GK+e4uBCDtE= X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Gm6N94hhMz4cCg X-Spamd-Bar: -- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.00 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[ntlworld.com:s=meg.feb2017]; HAS_XOIP(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:212.54.57.64/26]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[ntlworld.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[ntlworld.com,quarantine]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[212.54.57.96:from]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[212.54.57.96:from]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:33915, ipnet:212.54.48.0/20, country:NL]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions]; HAS_X_AS(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2021 02:05:46 -0000 On Tue, Aug 03, 2021 at 01:27:39PM -0400, Jonathan Moore wrote: > Hi, > > I have a few patches I would like to apply to a entire folder or directory > of source files > when I use bash to try to apply to a folder and I use the asterisk wildcard > I get an ambiguous redirect to resolve this issue. > > Thank You, > > Jonathan Since nobody has replied, I guess you've already found out that this is not how patches work. A patch changes something in a specific file to something else. If you are using a context diff to create the patch, it will typically apply even if the lines have moved (and report it applied with some fuzz). What you *can* do is: 1. Copy ALL the directory, call it 'a' or somename.orig. 2. Copy all of it again, call it 'b' or somename. 3. Change each file in 'b' or 'somename' as required. 4. Go up above this, diff the directories, e.g. diff -Naur a b >the-diff or diff -Naur somename{,orig,} >the-diff 5. You can then apply the-diff with patch -p1 to a future version of the directory, but eventually you will need to rediff when patches for one or more of the files no-longer apply. Alternatively, for some changes I guess sed might be the way to go - if so, make sure you have a copy of the directory before the sed, and diff them : the results of sed can often change more than was expected. ĸen -- Truth, in front of her huge walk-in wardrobe, selected black leather boots with stiletto heels for such a barefaced truth. - Unseen Academicals From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Aug 13 03:05:45 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 170FA676CEE for ; Fri, 13 Aug 2021 03:05:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dvoich@optonline.net) Received: from mta1.srv.hcvlny.cv.net (mta1.srv.hcvlny.cv.net [167.206.4.196]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.optonline.net", Issuer "DigiCert Global CA G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Gm7jM3WK2z4gKf for ; Fri, 13 Aug 2021 03:05:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dvoich@optonline.net) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=optonline.net; s=dkim-001; t=1628823937; bh=8VYpJ+HDiO3pFC2vEWLymXksNe/Az8OgHGf2DJhlzrQ=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-Id; b=mNcITItTTbK/97IE3oGsz77y2nTQJo4gmICEOoejnmiBSDciKZA9Cxg6TnQgjYIhp cSyRY86PSBGaI+mflYTRmVESqGR02c9Jwv1X/C94vXTqabY9tCTvKq2+s9DzZf0zr5 5PqWZqJ9MnKKkbDnoHaEYTReep9gWqAr2lT7dYxIBdjxlDhtZL6FkmO7MhkZ6TfpZC CK+aP0MoswkFswsQcaN37xTRLUFB5zIAt4gy3in6BTrIbXlkWMmma3dOjRnPQJRhez 2Mz0Z0+rPQap5Udi7k/BudTMiIohP6nDQz/J53hqiezohlsZQ8rNe+1zl0r/6WY/+/ fc7FOBPdQp/9w== X-Content-Analysis: v=2.3 cv=KI3B8GNo c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=HwdfnXRxwAscIlw0plT8Bw==:117 a=HwdfnXRxwAscIlw0plT8Bw==:17 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=NEAV23lmAAAA:8 a=RmCZpJVKwJKEFJCdAWgA:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=IjZwj45LgO3ly-622nXo:22 Received: from [24.185.145.223] ([24.185.145.223:54432] helo=happy.dwarf7.net) by mta1.srv.hcvlny.cv.net (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 3.6.9.48312 r(Core:3.6.9.0)) with ESMTP id 67/85-01746-181E5116; Thu, 12 Aug 2021 23:05:37 -0400 Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2021 23:05:35 -0400 From: Vlad Markov To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: gitup is dumping core Message-Id: <20210812230535.89ca0a1e6133b1330840d10c@optonline.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.33; amd64-portbld-freebsd13.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Gm7jM3WK2z4gKf X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=optonline.net header.s=dkim-001 header.b=mNcITItT; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of dvoich@optonline.net designates 167.206.4.196 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=dvoich@optonline.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.66 / 15.00]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[optonline.net:s=dkim-001]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[optonline.net]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[optonline.net]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.37)[0.370]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; DWL_DNSWL_LOW(-1.00)[optonline.net:dkim]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[24.185.145.223:received]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[optonline.net:+]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.93)[-0.933]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:167.206.4.192/27]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[optonline.net]; ASN(0.00)[asn:6128, ipnet:167.206.0.0/16, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[167.206.4.196:from] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2021 03:05:45 -0000 gitup is dumping core. I am stuck. I'd like to update my ports. Any ideas o= n what I should do? happy$ uname -a FreeBSD happy 13.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 13.0-RELEASE #0 releng/13.0-n244733-ea31= abc261f: Fri Apr 9 04:24:09 UTC 2021 root@releng1.nyi.freebsd.org:/usr= /obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/sys/GENERIC amd64 happy$ gitup -V gitup version 0.95 root@happy:~ # lldb -c gitup.core -- gitup (lldb) target create "gitup" --core "gitup.core" Core file '/root/gitup.core' (x86_64) was loaded. (lldb) thread backtrace all * thread #1, name =3D 'gitup', stop reason =3D signal SIGSEGV * frame #0: 0x0000000800794b2c libc.so.7`strcmp + 60 frame #1: 0x0000000000210028 gitup`___lldb_unnamed_symbol72$$gitup + 184 frame #2: 0x000000000020d5bf gitup`___lldb_unnamed_symbol58$$gitup + 255 frame #3: 0x000000000020b7c7 gitup`___lldb_unnamed_symbol51$$gitup + 87= 43 frame #4: 0x0000000000206100 gitup`___lldb_unnamed_symbol75$$gitup + 256 (lldb)=20 root@happy:~ # gitup -v1 ports # Scanning local repository... # Host: github.com # Port: 443 # Repository Path: /freebsd/freebsd-ports.git # Target Directory: /usr/ports # Commit History: yes # Have: 418cf3953f09d18828c95239a5da3b84223848af # Want: 251346b20de71cad6535495e07f166eeabfb266b # Branch: main # Action: pull Segmentation fault (core dumped) root@happy:~ # gitup ports # Scanning local repository... # Host: github.com # Port: 443 # Repository Path: /freebsd/freebsd-ports.git # Target Directory: /usr/ports # Commit History: yes # Have: 418cf3953f09d18828c95239a5da3b84223848af # Want: a9cee1b697b6150f5533dc94448ddd8a8c7bd225 # Branch: main # Action: pull Segmentation fault (core dumped) ------------------------------------ # $FreeBSD$ # # Default configuration options for gitup.conf. { "defaults" : { "host" : "git.freebsd.org", "port" : 443, "verbosity" : 1, "work_directory" : "/var/db/gitup", }, "ports" : { "host" : "github.com", "repository" : "/freebsd/freebsd-ports.git", "branch" : "main", "target" : "/usr/ports", "ignores" : [ "distfiles", "packages", ], }, "quarterly" : { "host" : "github.com", "repository" : "/freebsd/freebsd-ports.git", "branch" : "quarterly", "target" : "/usr/ports", "ignores" : [ "distfiles", "packages", ] }, "release" : { "repository" : "/src.git", "branch" : "releng/11.4", "target" : "/usr/src", "ignores" : [ "sys/amd64/conf", "sys/arm64/conf", "sys/i386/conf", "sys/pc98/conf", "sys/powerpc/conf", "sys/riscv/conf", "sys/sparc64/conf", ] }, "stable" : { "repository" : "/src.git", "branch" : "stable/12", "target" : "/usr/src", "ignores" : [ "sys/amd64/conf", "sys/arm64/conf", "sys/i386/conf", "sys/pc98/conf", "sys/powerpc/conf", "sys/riscv/conf", "sys/sparc64/conf", ] }, "current" : { "repository" : "/src.git", "branch" : "main", "target" : "/usr/src", "ignores" : [ "sys/amd64/conf", "sys/arm64/conf", "sys/i386/conf", "sys/pc98/conf", "sys/powerpc/conf", "sys/riscv/conf", "sys/sparc64/conf", ] } } --=20 I dream of a better tomorrow, where chickens can cross the road and not be = questioned about their motives.? ? Ralph Waldo Emerson From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Aug 13 06:17:09 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 493E4650B1C for ; Fri, 13 Aug 2021 06:17:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from grahamperrin@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wm1-x32a.google.com (mail-wm1-x32a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32a]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4GmCyD2ySWz4qXT for ; Fri, 13 Aug 2021 06:17:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from grahamperrin@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wm1-x32a.google.com with SMTP id u1so6185878wmm.0 for ; Thu, 12 Aug 2021 23:17:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=ffJjaJPCoVxS+OcuIkBvh6V0EY0nHweQ6OqOUtIfdPg=; b=gLcmmDj8g4mlckdddGh8lrr7cRGUbPElFII6xmZoXwa/kE/DPFad5v5Xvt3j0rL6iR wX7Ms11tu7hgYorwXUG55D0QuzdtEroLUz0pxCiCqGuIGAabGaQPmIgY968N9W0tJYoN x3YZStS/mY2LpBVUR8w41/+1xP1kwP32htbmFA2kWPpux6MXs0YwcFeNRilnUPN8z4Jo qgcGToqln5ZenxPzmKjP6fllgudSx3tew5hKtcvOG1as/wFR5wtsEymewobbzOEWej0S Yw2e0oaXbtssyCx0XO/v7YDOv4Xece+DuNMNlH7lsGNJdtDAkSYsQdTmsBZcVUQuod5E gLhQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=ffJjaJPCoVxS+OcuIkBvh6V0EY0nHweQ6OqOUtIfdPg=; b=OLSUAqR9xR1jWxucqsA7nw5/jdtJHBLc6sDcxzLNyUE17aOUcP2ncvotC8dpZjEg9Y E6lig7X83Smz26xiEPNNBH2qsQs6CSxPeL6mon757wtAJj/KMycKwcrR5UmbtgoDidbf Ich9PHGmmQOp509RTEfT4be3UFBx0njlskF91qD55D12iWBY+lRK456/45AGbqIrQ5TL EprhiXSYrabSihp+1LgKZZzkmORJiGvloGAyx73a9NOPbXX2aeEpUySuHgEuFoNREK/l kB6mBN0I7naAHRKPhZjWS6v4zk4elJgmNe00ZANaDgg0v2R0X4K/0jR3Cap4xJou2abb a41A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530wY3fFoMb6AKhhsae2pvtpL4uR8qbF29WRl9i8tmZsCXC+o01z wr1bGIHhtWMLsXEauI5beBem9g7bZRI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyGHLLPqGC4awIrFQEKsbfCDtm980ZBbVSjcVD2PydLTT3TUo5Rjbq0z0CFp6KANIiG8dgQhw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:c2:: with SMTP id u2mr960281wmm.106.1628835427194; Thu, 12 Aug 2021 23:17:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.7] (88-105-96-80.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com. [88.105.96.80]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p14sm415929wmc.16.2021.08.12.23.17.06 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 12 Aug 2021 23:17:06 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: gitup is dumping core To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20210812230535.89ca0a1e6133b1330840d10c@optonline.net> From: Graham Perrin Message-ID: Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2021 07:17:05 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210812230535.89ca0a1e6133b1330840d10c@optonline.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-GB X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4GmCyD2ySWz4qXT X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=gLcmmDj8; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of grahamperrin@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4864:20::32a as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=grahamperrin@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.94 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a00:1450:4000::/36:c]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[88.105.96.80:received]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2a00:1450::/32, country:US]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.94)[-0.940]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com:dkim]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(1.00)[1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2a00:1450:4864:20::32a:from]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2021 06:17:09 -0000 On 13/08/2021 04:05, Vlad Markov wrote: > happy$ uname -a > FreeBSD happy 13.0-RELEASE … Try a system update. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Aug 13 07:38:07 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 934B2651ED2 for ; Fri, 13 Aug 2021 07:38:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from grahamperrin@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wm1-x32b.google.com (mail-wm1-x32b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32b]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4GmFlf3XWkz3CZs for ; Fri, 13 Aug 2021 07:38:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from grahamperrin@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wm1-x32b.google.com with SMTP id u15so6268455wmj.1 for ; Fri, 13 Aug 2021 00:38:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=63nXmEFw2KjNcIAOUhEp9wEi2YRyeCYUjjkbV0MQwOA=; b=D+WNf53rdN6C3G/nE0qPO9GfOJh8WNLb6JEnZO7Hvihhe6lcDmK/LjmV3lzd/5UZZm VMR6xtxvEcIjF3gapvpe1gYtDAgPMC6Ry1VA3PaeJ/1efbE2jAog2/qGKGDYvXwDKM+/ CQEpdW5utbf/CzCBLOu4CrGVB9UkBng6NgIlT6qZKkdLsNVv9Sq5tpsxn47uYGYZhU3t twL7fQUKEMxbCtX6fTd+DQPp2F8SZOSYfhYM48eVUADE9l540XGu/llvYr5VULciK2LK GXmjpakIEOCj/JhSmfVETx+Mr1sQ1inA+qe1+/KflFOfO2w7tSRlTPOFgf26iPNMfnUh TKCQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=63nXmEFw2KjNcIAOUhEp9wEi2YRyeCYUjjkbV0MQwOA=; b=H6z0Y1+gw2la8J3YBVChrRPWw9BtzTOWjHnlTSa9KrIQMaq7aQ4AR7pGflP9nZaBoM ynblqIyZ5NvpTER5tsK8Cmbn77OXBgnED+O3dJnetnO3TCdtewTZQ/8yBuSPswEI/6mX h2I1jo9QfvrrwV3ZhtuPLYYlEw5nZYaDZ2UQ9B6yGsqQupEEh1aTrGi09fhZPnwW6sQc PCs1Lh2W/t6Stfu/gDFhmJp5UwAIUYdVvRdZCZ8IPcfXvBwuGaZ2W4Lf8eJhT2L4spNX v/tcs7G22JTZQLlgVHVj3RcHPBJNK4dipxt7DYKOem7rFnUjgYtdP24iFbGNSpJIk0L0 Gp7g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533nInSz2k51r21sjcYa9n4Ik0V2fm4eUReIqnWyKpuqNoxY/bmW c1bwyGrSey6BAmcKCOsNTr4bnTsVx3g= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz/Adw8yEXcVdx/7VpF/imk68pnQG1zmXVxWF7IQu+SkNg5PGmukn67TjE0HFfREwNhMHj9KQ== X-Received: by 2002:a7b:cd1a:: with SMTP id f26mr694971wmj.136.1628840285188; Fri, 13 Aug 2021 00:38:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.7] (88-105-96-80.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com. [88.105.96.80]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n10sm577181wmq.3.2021.08.13.00.38.04 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 13 Aug 2021 00:38:04 -0700 (PDT) Subject: repository priorities (was: pkg lock) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20210812125424.47ab3bb9@dismail.de> From: Graham Perrin Message-ID: Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2021 08:38:04 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-GB X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4GmFlf3XWkz3CZs X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=D+WNf53r; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of grahamperrin@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4864:20::32b as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=grahamperrin@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.64 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a00:1450:4000::/36:c]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.99)[-0.993]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[88.105.96.80:received]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2a00:1450::/32, country:US]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.65)[-0.650]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com:dkim]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2a00:1450:4864:20::32b:from]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2021 07:38:07 -0000 On 12/08/2021 18:11, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > … poudriere repository's supplied .pkg will take precedence over > central FreeBSD repository's one, unless poudriere has older than > FreeBSD repository version of package. … Not necessarily. please see, for example, CONSERVATIVE_UPGRADE and PRIORITY. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Aug 13 17:32:06 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06F8565BFDF for ; Fri, 13 Aug 2021 17:32:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dvoich@optonline.net) Received: from mta1.srv.hcvlny.cv.net (mta1.srv.hcvlny.cv.net [167.206.4.196]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.optonline.net", Issuer "DigiCert Global CA G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4GmVx123GPz4Zdn for ; Fri, 13 Aug 2021 17:32:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dvoich@optonline.net) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=optonline.net; s=dkim-001; t=1628875924; bh=lmOpPEU3TvC+gaqsA7Pf0PWegOS8XE7qpLebz+ccVmo=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-Id; b=Vzb0PUN1IE1usX6GF6zNWmMcXiE020bYDUQiuQscBoMKuFuBkhqMGDYt4ImkqvN1A WQ+5aEeHP7wdJ6xZgasJvkm0sskdG55n+3R5rcV8B28mJqyQpoSQ3m5rJeiZod/tvR p+9lC7pltQA9Wlt9rO5Wo/M5YGqh573oAfWJGzlbQ1ZC2KznNYt7tO54PqdaCiBlGW CYVJbat8YaAr4zX6pVfvvYSqd5D1b6cnKauQ2wrIBk+3ErI5ujSIg5AajmJ1JNFkdd 8UcWgSWeLf8i+ra5xgNONX4vGNmG37v3+vfDFpjkH/pXmefrVIOXaoWnEqfWKnuKLd ig15V/rdLv3kw== X-Content-Analysis: v=2.3 cv=KI3B8GNo c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=HwdfnXRxwAscIlw0plT8Bw==:117 a=HwdfnXRxwAscIlw0plT8Bw==:17 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=pGLkceISAAAA:8 a=s9oXJcMGAAAA:8 a=dRjuHGetk34f6FNnDXMA:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=cNNliUDrGJfcKjVfkxUC:22 Received: from [24.185.145.223] ([24.185.145.223:59008] helo=happy.dwarf7.net) by mta1.srv.hcvlny.cv.net (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 3.6.9.48312 r(Core:3.6.9.0)) with ESMTP id 35/6A-01746-49CA6116; Fri, 13 Aug 2021 13:32:04 -0400 Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2021 13:32:02 -0400 From: Vlad Markov To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gitup is dumping core Message-Id: <20210813133202.200858a5f2ffd59177d96a13@optonline.net> In-Reply-To: References: <20210812230535.89ca0a1e6133b1330840d10c@optonline.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.33; amd64-portbld-freebsd13.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4GmVx123GPz4Zdn X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=optonline.net header.s=dkim-001 header.b=Vzb0PUN1; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of dvoich@optonline.net designates 167.206.4.196 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=dvoich@optonline.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.88 / 15.00]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[optonline.net]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:167.206.4.192/27]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[optonline.net:+]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[24.185.145.223:received]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[optonline.net]; ASN(0.00)[asn:6128, ipnet:167.206.0.0/16, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.78)[-0.781]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[optonline.net:s=dkim-001]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[167.206.4.196:from]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[optonline.net]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; DWL_DNSWL_LOW(-1.00)[optonline.net:dkim]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2021 17:32:06 -0000 On Fri, 13 Aug 2021 07:17:05 +0100 Graham Perrin wrote: > On 13/08/2021 04:05, Vlad Markov wrote: > > happy$ uname -a > > FreeBSD happy 13.0-RELEASE ? >=20 > Try a system update. >=20 That did not work. FreeBSD happy 13.0-RELEASE-p3 FreeBSD 13.0-RELEASE-p3 #0: Tue Jun 29 19:46:= 20 UTC 2021 root@amd64-builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/amd64.a= md64/sys/GENERIC amd64 I deinstalled and then installed gitup after the update. It still core dumps. I guess I need to build it with debugging symbols and = see what strings are being compared. Here is the dump from that effort. root@happy:/usr/ports/net/gitup/work/gitup-0.95 # lldb -c gitup.core -- git= up (lldb) target create "gitup" --core "gitup.core" Core file '/usr/ports/net/gitup/work/gitup-0.95/gitup.core' (x86_64) was lo= aded. (lldb) thread backtrace all * thread #1, name =3D 'gitup', stop reason =3D signal SIGSEGV * frame #0: 0x0000000800794b2c libc.so.7`strcmp + 60 frame #1: 0x0000000000210058 gitup`load_object [inlined] file_node_comp= are_path(a=3D, b=3D0x00000008057c0350) at gitup.c:196:10 frame #2: 0x000000000021004c gitup`load_object [inlined] Tree_Local_Pat= h_RB_FIND(head=3D, elm=3D) at gitup.c:249 frame #3: 0x0000000000210030 gitup`load_object(session=3D0x00007fffffff= 8860, hash=3D"dcd24b8b8198561695a2d600e64013d04a8c438c", path=3D0x000000000= 0000000) at gitup.c:1078 frame #4: 0x000000000020d5ff gitup`apply_deltas(session=3D= ) at gitup.c:2432:4 frame #5: 0x000000000020b807 gitup`main(argc=3D, argv=3D) at gitup.c:3896:3 frame #6: 0x00000000002060f0 gitup`_start(ap=3D, cleanup= =3D) at crt1_c.c:75:7 (lldb)=20 From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Aug 13 17:33:55 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24D3065C0CE for ; Fri, 13 Aug 2021 17:33:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bmcgover@cisco.com) Received: from rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com [173.37.86.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "iport.cisco.com", Issuer "HydrantID Server CA O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4GmVz53Vnxz4Znw for ; Fri, 13 Aug 2021 17:33:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bmcgover@cisco.com) IronPort-PHdr: =?us-ascii?q?A9a23=3ABu18qBR4Qu6Ggw1oYS2UBrXRUtpso13LVj580?= =?us-ascii?q?XJvo7xUf6mp5JikO1bQtr1hj17MCIPc7f8My+/bqLvpVmFI55Gd+GsDf5pBW?= =?us-ascii?q?15g640WkgUsDdTDBRj9K/jnPCIgEclIT1Mj+Gu0YgBZHc/kbAjUpXu/pTcZB?= =?us-ascii?q?hT4M19zIeL4Uo7fhsi6zaa84ZrWNg5JnzG6J7h1KUbekA=3D=3D?= IronPort-HdrOrdr: =?us-ascii?q?A9a23=3A7iw19qv7XjKCQRKdZPxl/Z3J7skCyYMji2?= =?us-ascii?q?hC6mlwRA09TyXGraGTdaUguyMc1gx/ZJh5o6H7BEDyewKgyXcV2/hcAV7GZm?= =?us-ascii?q?nbUQSTXflfBOfZsljd8k7Fh6FgPMVbAtND4bTLZDAQ56uXkWrIcerIq+P3l5?= =?us-ascii?q?xA8N2utkuFOjsaDZ2IgT0JbjqzIwlTfk1rFJA5HJ2T6o5svDy7Y0kaacy9Gz?= =?us-ascii?q?0sQ/XDj8ejruOpXTc2QzocrCWehzKh77D3VzKC2A0Fbj9JybA+tUDYjg3C4L?= =?us-ascii?q?m5uf3T8G6c64aT1eUXpDLS8KoAOCW+sLlRFtwqsHftWG1VYczAgNnympDp1L?= =?us-ascii?q?9lqqiLn/5qBbUO15qYRBDLnfKq4Xi47N7rgEWSkmNxRhDY0JTErXsBerR8rJ?= =?us-ascii?q?McfR3D50U6utZglKpNwmKCrpJSSQjNhSLn+rHzJllXf2eP0AwfeNQo/jViuE?= =?us-ascii?q?olGc1shJ1a+FkQHIYLHSr85oxiGO5yDNvE7PITdV+BdXjWsmRm3dTpBx0Ib1?= =?us-ascii?q?27a1lHvtbQ3yldnXh/wUddzMsDnm0Y/JZ4T5Vf/ezLPqlhibkLRM4LaqB2Av?= =?us-ascii?q?sHXKKMeyfwaAOJNHjXLUXsFakBNX6Io5nr4K8t7OXvY5AMxItaouW3bLqZjx?= =?us-ascii?q?9HR6vKM7zC4HRmyGG8fIyNZ0WZ9igF3ekJhlTVfsuZDRG+?= X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0DUBwCXrBZh/5ldJa1aHgE8DAILFYF?= =?us-ascii?q?ZgSMwUQeBUTcxiA8DhTmeJIUCgS6BJQNUCwEBAQ0BAUEEAQGEYAKCaQIlNAk?= =?us-ascii?q?OAQIEAQEBEgEBBQEBAQIBBgSBEROFaAEMhjkiLgEBOBEBCwF0JwQbEweETlI?= =?us-ascii?q?FAy8BnXsBgToCih94gTOBAYIHAQEGBASFKxiCNAmBOoJ9hA2CbIQjHIFJRIF?= =?us-ascii?q?Yh2aDS4IuhE6CW55tgWOdewqDKJ5rEqZ1kFuFNqUcAgQCBAUCDgEBBoFgO4F?= =?us-ascii?q?ZcBWDJFAZDpISil5zOAIGDAEBAwmJSQEB?= X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.84,319,1620691200"; d="scan'208,217";a="826999332" Received: from rcdn-core-2.cisco.com ([173.37.93.153]) by rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 13 Aug 2021 17:33:35 +0000 Received: from mail.cisco.com (xbe-rcd-007.cisco.com [173.37.102.22]) by rcdn-core-2.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 17DHXaiD010896 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Fri, 13 Aug 2021 17:33:36 GMT Received: from xfe-rtp-002.cisco.com (64.101.210.232) by xbe-rcd-007.cisco.com (173.37.102.22) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.792.15; Fri, 13 Aug 2021 12:33:36 -0500 Received: from xfe-rcd-005.cisco.com (173.37.227.253) by xfe-rtp-002.cisco.com (64.101.210.232) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.792.15; Fri, 13 Aug 2021 13:33:35 -0400 Received: from NAM10-BN7-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (72.163.14.9) by xfe-rcd-005.cisco.com (173.37.227.253) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.792.15 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 13 Aug 2021 12:33:35 -0500 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=jxzgo01IZUz0/Iki81ZtspxTwcGzEXyyGgLmNDGMeq0PQgV7ZU6jXGVc42TI71uyLGBngabB4r8gRvw1jUhyEBkEBIHCNdJRgyR6rKoDoboZShB5q1ix//eTxvU0rd/qGR+2QnG2CTozLHrdaIx1JhxbawruUMa9UaFO4fU6PApqejqyss4GtzPtxpyu3PtbEOWnVFy2AlbNH9OJwxR33kTTNmgsfUUik9wO2zGnqUltHxAM0lENL4aG8StKhRavPfFHGZ8DW0vwqc+d0KL8w2bP7/oDHR4YMwRD4z6n6X30tuhiZHdtf7Wypk4vMSxTQeAhEpdxjGpbE5r0c684aQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=ADBl0zu6/w2Z23Vaa5T4nkIirtGCnS4z2Lt6QNuXqek=; b=mdoaXHSEPQ0/gDLTGTYO3FLlUi+MLn/yikMieXgGreR4BCva1D9KVvDR5K4w/S1YYO/pFgqsyHOpbs1NJthhFVf7zHWViLWO2Z2XYd+YTe4e/3IIRb93/tOv6eVO4nki6H4aQq7ZSf6Cgt53lDdwLxS7fouVAW7TOSi1f4/yji8fUw5wK6hJaOydqeRMpiXLQxCTa0YS0P9hHx8LLhK/02t3KHdc7ZixcJXzd/Mflbu39eo0999z1kFFFtMTf/qg/qrMaNbt0s5625njk/oyu7cn8F9KKuQLElWNbEvxej6mM0tW//LcE0D3GD7Vj71UPA3BG+GVdLUx6jEjXf2sRg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none Received: from BN6PR11MB1650.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:405:11::19) by BN6PR11MB1745.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:404:103::9) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.4415.18; Fri, 13 Aug 2021 17:33:29 +0000 Received: from BN6PR11MB1650.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::a022:995c:4e78:5a04]) by BN6PR11MB1650.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::a022:995c:4e78:5a04%5]) with mapi id 15.20.4415.017; Fri, 13 Aug 2021 17:33:29 +0000 From: "Brian McGovern (bmcgover)" To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Arduino Development on aarch64? Thread-Topic: Arduino Development on aarch64? Thread-Index: AQHXkGjFZ80C+I866Eq5IW9E/PpXKg== Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2021 17:33:29 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-ms-publictraffictype: Email x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 6261eff4-572e-464f-4df8-08d95e8076de x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BN6PR11MB1745: x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:8882; x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1 x-ms-exchange-antispam-relay: 0 x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 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 x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:BN6PR11MB1650.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFS:(366004)(4744005)(7696005)(122000001)(86362001)(38070700005)(71200400001)(5660300002)(508600001)(38100700002)(33656002)(6506007)(19627405001)(9686003)(55016002)(66446008)(66556008)(66946007)(64756008)(8936002)(52536014)(91956017)(76116006)(186003)(26005)(8676002)(6916009)(316002)(2906002)(66476007); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata-chunkcount: 1 x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata-0: =?iso-8859-1?Q?TciA2WJ02QsPYNBkHRMKCfTTrzQGcmQe+t6kZ8mQCbABgDqFvYDIbrEz9a?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?BVRPGC/mnO8oWh0vwf0GFAOmJzYYSQAlJC2kUxQGVwElDtxm1wVmARsKXQ?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?4rlFOrKftSqNll7lZE/T7dIOIJAYCE+Rz0I1npetJMzz4ZwQ3spQBRweco?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?xJ6//g820i3cBikN4KMuyveoYAHRFk99rBw8y0TT9oT0jpI+IyuFBFbjRJ?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?CgozRTP0S+0M5ihoHrUiPhwstGkOdGxt1uoddQ1zWYeUx42uPKwVRy5Cdc?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?maSYza+9Qc8dPkDLqaXzKJVAZTgwdA9jpmKqlCldACXG7cOm3OKQsntrRv?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?8pC3e2vrhVmESWsZcOHbtTz44V9avjUAus3O2d51PfBggkBl1Os0KFerBw?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?fYGiVdVOMGA+VIGeL0Oyuo/oKFHTY8ue1qL7BKODFDorFjbzZC/Z9F0YzG?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?obxmGyaaXsWHf1Xe02WaJhPG+rjsfWr+/5w7gJCNcMg/dZZo4Wn+QWcjT/?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?lJGvjffi1RnMbejmMf6A1XzkI7ZMqlIlSU7TqRzqj0og8s2iN6UVE1Egvo?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?1YIN9jpi4I9eLYsmK+o2BWRgb9fP9lidPPPdSbTXqvLoZAwEOQfXgvbxYP?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?mu3vl651JpdVcXT+tI6MzITzpMTUY4XqOIhb9uKg/A4Xa5nKxKR2chipo6?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?E3gpWgs0fd6qNnx0sJYRkLyfjeES4qj+vN1KwxpROpKMd60c7sluuy1g/v?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?aDk1n2ax7hlw/wprv23/v5xPVuu7FygRYf4JAhfFPyZc/F7KlkzjmySPyS?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?39Wcugkj5brjSxUFWLSmX4RsmZo5BSwd0kdnG8hL4fCNlK986eT691XU0h?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?C76C+JeVAvKKX65Dl4CWZBLzahHj/mOBa+0J08U6vOIJBhvOQMLJpGdJ80?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?dG8hG6yr89cP+Bj33cbEsa7lqX5rgEEB0wydiD5RqL86L2edkGKpexnMIU?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?ANkqn7SRfZg9tc2G9Mn29KZkS6WDfUW3p8y+qC7a9MsLVCTmf1ff0yYYlz?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?bY/V4DTh44p5pM/nYrKXFIDFhH8FzGYQNZiIYHDtF42X/TP+nPHa9sfDj8?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?8wUE+JkBEpe/+gXPClie78MkctdwPTMTJqIoid6QY4IcLlA5LfO9FQLUm4?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?wn7NsUZOt0xgj4J2SSYzoq0c9Z1dC6qfeaGJ0Pj4di3b6fhnUtkIUN9OBY?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?1a87YlXlqx3S8XNDAlsaj1PzZ5hpcforCMxESieyujCdk/fbmpneL14qt1?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?3+j+fwiZoEMeGPzYEb361xrUGTNm4sHeuT0JJcL8hN+OhPpxatq/imj93/?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?w3QA+1jich?= x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: BN6PR11MB1650.namprd11.prod.outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 6261eff4-572e-464f-4df8-08d95e8076de X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 13 Aug 2021 17:33:29.0801 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: 6r9Yh9WcFrWVYLR+sLcHJZG5LUp2ujfSOjcJJ6JVomGy3vPe6VMpZmbZyQrVWMrXMpJV8/iw0tJ5bNdJOUvEsA== X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BN6PR11MB1745 X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.37.102.22, xbe-rcd-007.cisco.com X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-2.cisco.com X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4GmVz53Vnxz4Znw X-Spamd-Bar: -------- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-8.90 / 15.00]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_GOOD(0.00)[173.37.86.80:from]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:173.37.86.0/24]; RCVD_DKIM_ARC_DNSWL_MED(-0.50)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED(-0.40)[173.37.86.80:from,173.37.93.153:received]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[cisco.com:+,cisco.onmicrosoft.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[cisco.com,quarantine]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; ASN(0.00)[asn:109, ipnet:173.37.64.0/18, country:US]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; ARC_ALLOW(-1.00)[microsoft.com:s=arcselector9901:i=1]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[cisco.com:s=iport,cisco.onmicrosoft.com:s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; DWL_DNSWL_LOW(-1.00)[cisco.com:dkim]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_ALL(0.00)[]; WHITELIST_SPF_DKIM(-3.00)[cisco.com:d:+,cisco.com:s:+]; RCVD_COUNT_SEVEN(0.00)[8]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.34 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2021 17:33:55 -0000 This is likely a silly question, but is there a solution for doing Arduino = development on any of the ARM 64 platforms? From what I can see in the curr= ent ports tree, it looks like gcc for arduino is marked broken for aarch64,= as is the Arduino 1.8 IDE. I'm just trying to figure out if I can do some= Arduino programming (CLI/text mode is fine, IDE is a bit better) from my P= Is, or whether I should plan on an AMD64 platform for this. -Brian From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Aug 13 18:43:55 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 212E565D93D for ; Fri, 13 Aug 2021 18:43:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tomek@cedro.info) Received: from mail-wm1-x32f.google.com (mail-wm1-x32f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32f]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4GmXWt13q8z4dgR for ; Fri, 13 Aug 2021 18:43:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tomek@cedro.info) Received: by mail-wm1-x32f.google.com with SMTP id u1so7506415wmm.0 for ; Fri, 13 Aug 2021 11:43:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cedro.info; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=zb2kPL52gf3J9TdCvxwOJhowCttwflZ/jUr1OZ4NTnc=; b=Ca1c0ShoZbSSwQI71tHiH68ufjFwB8XFSdjxOsyEzyWVRZZ3BySvbXhgU6/cDoJdVw Fc/Y6PWbqFkx/QYTbFkk6PzLo9uhL91YGEsK5lQa5RFjcx3YMogInYGCE18wP+EXwl4j +xacqmQCzMu77BHeWf8qFO8Bm8sOTTOefvXxWMlbYctgHPqsIlwuSvpfVxSvSwjRbPdb ewdL4nmtzQtdX7WhwyCwc92+VYnegjh+gEINphbgbOJF9rtcC/YTw6FjkXBY0au1bUKO WDVGX+jI5TrRXS3HmQbUjswxw34kwtDzsx9hDfPNXvDNZr+I6nEXTbBiQR49L8NxRQZ/ yb1g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=zb2kPL52gf3J9TdCvxwOJhowCttwflZ/jUr1OZ4NTnc=; b=itF5sVdN9z8Pdjy193GAU0c6P7hVqT6+61cqhd0GCo7ye5JWeLT5rnLQdZ0Gxz6GKG PyC+0Be5OSeW84tD0jOnerj9KdgueyCb+RZOpnu1eEM8K85aP0HKyPPralEEMa456AQE CE+qukKiw2t6HG0fQxXIAO5f2waho42wYy7rEzIJiXkB/Il4uI7JIVnQlWWPYxTHmmek H8lOh7oG/HKQAkwMMrfNYiYFd0d1SZsCiY6jiBOSiKuz4QVM/4JW7XG86LBmHqpdA5pE ZNtwm1zg6Ak8hYkVjLGZEoRqxHqxlxUkoyZkRBqnazdLR74gM/RwIIH+5gVCYDM0pz6y iRww== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM53360L5qsog5AqiRks754OPPhg+mMi74pR8KIoS31ObN21p7EaQ6 mkHbU6XuUyRtbZgmgTvCcmhcFruqKsVjGJ7Dxyx+FQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz3PtZr7bfexgaZh8WzHniObxTgR6WHaaPkbRPOgbiFWM2EpKYvnokNj4I6Plpbegdxw8Yj0Jy5Ru5RGzig5vM= X-Received: by 2002:a7b:cb02:: with SMTP id u2mr3942818wmj.103.1628880233157; Fri, 13 Aug 2021 11:43:53 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Tomasz CEDRO Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2021 20:43:32 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Arduino Development on aarch64? To: "Brian McGovern (bmcgover)" Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4GmXWt13q8z4dgR X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=cedro.info header.s=google header.b=Ca1c0Sho; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of tomek@cedro.info has no SPF policy when checking 2a00:1450:4864:20::32f) smtp.mailfrom=tomek@cedro.info X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.25 / 15.00]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_SOME(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[cedro.info:s=google]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.95)[-0.951]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-0.999]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[cedro.info]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[cedro.info:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2a00:1450:4864:20::32f:from]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2a00:1450::/32, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2021 18:43:55 -0000 On Fri, Aug 13, 2021 at 7:34 PM Brian McGovern (bmcgover) wrote: > This is likely a silly question, but is there a solution for doing Arduin= o development on any of the ARM 64 platforms? From what I can see in the cu= rrent ports tree, it looks like gcc for arduino is marked broken for aarch6= 4, as is the Arduino 1.8 IDE. I'm just trying to figure out if I can do so= me Arduino programming (CLI/text mode is fine, IDE is a bit better) from my= PIs, or whether I should plan on an AMD64 platform for this. Hey Brian, very good question, not silly :-) I work with this kind of embedded stuff on FreeBSD AMD64 for years. Also helped with tools for ARM and Linux. So it should be possible on FreeBSD too. I am nor sure on status of some specific tools here with FreeBSD running on ARM sorry I work on AMD64. Your research and patches would be much appreciated in this area :-) It depends on particular target and RTOS that you would like to use. Because I don't really like Arduino and its GUI approach, I prefer standalone shell build environment. I have worked with MBED and Zephyr on FreeBSD with success. Some friends from Brasil tease me with NuttX that was until recent change released on BSD license and it also works on 8-bit+ CPU :-) I usually work with ARM Cortex-M faimily with Zephyr RTOS + gcc-arm-embedded package and pyOCD + Python VirtualEnv for flashing and Debug over DAPLink. Instead using Arduino Espressif for ESP32-C2 (Xtensa CPU) I am using also Zephyr RTOS + Linux toolchain that with my recent patch install itself for Zephyr with just `west espressif install` :-) I have ordered ESP32-C3 with Open-Source RISC-V CPU but will have to wait for a free moment to play with it and Zephyr.. I saw the commits with support added :-) Therefore you may also play with Zephyr or NuttX as the elegant full Open-Source well designed solution :-) Arduino SDK works on FreeBSD AMD64 but it mostly relies on external modules. You can even use it with ESP32-C2 (see wiki below) but that needs some manual dirty hacks to use Linux toolchain.. thus I am not sure if that runs on ARM Linuxlator. Here is small wiki of Electronics on FreeBSD: https://wiki.freebsd.org/electronics You may play with some MCU tools on ARM FreeBSD and update the wiki where necessary :-) Have fun! :-) Tomek --=20 CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat Aug 14 10:15:03 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B0036695BA for ; Sat, 14 Aug 2021 10:15:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk) Received: from cp160176.hpdns.net (cp160176.hpdns.net [91.238.160.176]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4GmxBG0K4Bz3L2D for ; Sat, 14 Aug 2021 10:15:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=milibyte.co.uk; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender :Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help: List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=pO4C+DZwyg0Fugc2jnimen5NlmUvbc6kDGKowAWzIi4=; b=gbAiNfEv+Vc/8wGqqSD9CRyIdx YnJN5EUFEkrVxbEhbSsF4MgRUnzOI172XUQXNeFZBQwd+Myg9KByTHrN+LX8ByRjhVUlw32SdBVYZ bNJeTotfSO/Gtt4VOUssivj34x6Fe29J1XtSKea/eia+uN6KDEKn8pkRr1fjpDeqxiSbVQz+P9SYh aqQCpWoPi/8wqYbeffWgBHfhdSHJdwm6aFGie1Geqf5tVXBKP4kpXjVXASf+nJhiAFT+wBkalnnmp Mu+mAHyygP6Mu/t0wovLZNL8p+GKTdIpuBJbdxXdhNTr49mEB1hcatBhmYMw8Idb0UEdynNc3KZtx Mn/rnOHg==; Received: from 82-71-56-121.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk ([82.71.56.121]:47272 helo=curlew.milibyte.co.uk) by cp160176.hpdns.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1mEqgm-000E8F-He; Sat, 14 Aug 2021 11:14:52 +0100 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=curlew.localnet) by curlew.milibyte.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1mEqgl-0001EE-SK; Sat, 14 Aug 2021 11:14:52 +0100 From: Mike Clarke To: FreeBSD Questions Cc: LuMiWa Subject: Re: pkg lock Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2021 11:14:52 +0100 Message-ID: <5562216.8T7jmnknE8@curlew> In-Reply-To: <20210812125424.47ab3bb9@dismail.de> References: <20210812125424.47ab3bb9@dismail.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on curlew.milibyte.co.uk); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-YourOrg-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-YourOrg-MailScanner-ID: 1mEqgm-000E8F-He X-YourOrg-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-YourOrg-MailScanner-SpamCheck: X-YourOrg-MailScanner-From: jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk X-Spam-Status: No X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - cp160176.hpdns.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - milibyte.co.uk X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: cp160176.hpdns.net: authenticated_id: mailpool@milibyte.co.uk X-Authenticated-Sender: cp160176.hpdns.net: mailpool@milibyte.co.uk X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4GmxBG0K4Bz3L2D X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=milibyte.co.uk header.s=default header.b=gbAiNfEv; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk designates 91.238.160.176 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.50 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+a]; HAS_X_SOURCE(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[milibyte.co.uk:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-0.999]; HAS_X_ANTIABUSE(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; CTE_CASE(0.50)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:12703, ipnet:91.238.160.0/22, country:GB]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; HAS_X_AS(0.00)[mailpool@milibyte.co.uk]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[milibyte.co.uk:s=default]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[milibyte.co.uk]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; HAS_X_GMSV(0.00)[mailpool@milibyte.co.uk]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[91.238.160.176:from]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.34 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2021 10:15:03 -0000 On Thursday, 12 August 2021 17:54:24 BST LuMiWa via freebsd- questions wrote: > I am using binary packages (latest) on FreeBSD 13.0-RELEASE. > I have 8 applications where I have my own settings. Is it correct when > I built the and install that I should use "pkg lock name" of > port/package, please? Or is something other. Yes, that's the way to go but if you rebuild the port for any reason you will need to unlock it for the duration of the build otherwise the final stage of installing the package will fail. -- Mike Clarke From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat Aug 14 12:14:26 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C6B166BE16 for ; Sat, 14 Aug 2021 12:14:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lumiwa@dismail.de) Received: from mx1.dismail.de (mx1.dismail.de [78.46.223.134]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA512 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mx1.dismail.de", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Gmzr10RkHz3jYk for ; Sat, 14 Aug 2021 12:14:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lumiwa@dismail.de) Received: from mx1.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 8cd64407; Sat, 14 Aug 2021 14:14:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp2.dismail.de ( [10.240.26.12]) by mx1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id a30d025e; Sat, 14 Aug 2021 14:14:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp2.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp2.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 2bd1984f; Sat, 14 Aug 2021 14:14:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: by dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 16c54b64 (TLSv1.3:AEAD-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO); Sat, 14 Aug 2021 14:14:14 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2021 08:14:10 -0400 From: LuMiWa To: Mike Clarke Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: pkg lock Message-ID: <20210814081410.0e6e2a12@dismail.de> In-Reply-To: <5562216.8T7jmnknE8@curlew> References: <20210812125424.47ab3bb9@dismail.de> <5562216.8T7jmnknE8@curlew> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.18.0 (GTK+ 2.24.33; amd64-portbld-freebsd13.0) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Gmzr10RkHz3jYk X-Spamd-Bar: ----- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-5.10 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[dismail.de:s=20190914]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:78.46.223.134]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DWL_DNSWL_LOW(-1.00)[dismail.de:dkim]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[dismail.de:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[dismail.de,reject]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:78.46.0.0/15, country:DE]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[78.46.223.134:from] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2021 12:14:26 -0000 On Sat, 14 Aug 2021 11:14:52 +0100 Mike Clarke wrote: > On Thursday, 12 August 2021 17:54:24 BST LuMiWa via freebsd- > questions wrote: >=20 > > I am using binary packages (latest) on FreeBSD 13.0-RELEASE. > > I have 8 applications where I have my own settings. Is it correct=20 > when > > I built the and install that I should use "pkg lock name" of > > port/package, please? Or is something other. >=20 > Yes, that's the way to go but if you rebuild the port for any reason > you will need to unlock it for the duration of the build otherwise > the final stage of installing the package will fail. >=20 Thank you, I did and I wrote which ports I locked :). --=20 "Everyone thinks of changing the world, but no one thinks of changing himself.=E2=80=9D Leo Tolstoy From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat Aug 14 16:11:26 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC2E866F41A for ; Sat, 14 Aug 2021 16:11:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tal@whatexit.org) Received: from mail-vk1-xa33.google.com (mail-vk1-xa33.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::a33]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Gn55T495Fz4Smq for ; Sat, 14 Aug 2021 16:11:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tal@whatexit.org) Received: by mail-vk1-xa33.google.com with SMTP id k124so3365393vke.5 for ; Sat, 14 Aug 2021 09:11:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=whatexit.org; s=google; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=xCKFC0ljyeLuJ1vZD+s4psFqvAmzQycUoDgLGbYIY1I=; b=4l8RDvA62E6V+qpykb/LfX8TEy6SLMPVbIAEhPif2Zfgh2Bm1HnApHKpLnmhTyQlWE pfgHThasK+iIojtMe8Aafy7w/1L6ZBh0arxyfSdnA4vj+/Jlh5Bd+lXaMG5Ol6Q+JQTU 2NxUg0pMYUJOo4QqJWdXQSas8IJRp1PRC/pzE= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=xCKFC0ljyeLuJ1vZD+s4psFqvAmzQycUoDgLGbYIY1I=; b=Exuv4O+RCc0SNhj+yhMie6RSFmTVtA/VfR7UUmCEXzrzMrrhbNKLwx6VIKEZwJ8r6t cRIy4cqyiQdM91XeE+8mY0wLaBruHL3tkuPOHeLMNP5OOdqVUWdOgCbTjOUexFD0fG3G piNHz1CnfzYVzXDAt8ieWLVR4cTPFGiyNHJToTOVoyRkeklwojJ0Qh48ktygPZKqt8tn XhvT4u3DXw1bpQIxu1wwdAFbNbUwGXE6G3NWu1Z0Ku1KFJZLGi31IYRPqU2E7FpGG98p OLlgZ99cmq+fByvYQsp4K4/MPVY2nY71xO/0YAGLOM6Fhl6sVx7aiYMSkGfwRjGHiQWD Sq2g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533Y8ixzFypP3oSPI0Dbd3OqWZ9p8o2yUefYFXygMm83c8p49//H CO6dkC0IngqnD318RVyX+9ukAGAXKrcZtWVlSO4ciSKOeOUWaYkZ X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy2n5fF1eXpVTh8Fez4QnAG4u1+K9dgj/F4bcQbDLxJX6JNWg5yynVsDds0g9LOuc0EluWkQ22fhR1YMzo5iUQ= X-Received: by 2002:a1f:160f:: with SMTP id 15mr5410734vkw.15.1628957478508; Sat, 14 Aug 2021 09:11:18 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Tom Limoncelli Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2021 12:11:07 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: What is the "fourandsix" user? To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Gn55T495Fz4Smq X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=whatexit.org header.s=google header.b=4l8RDvA6; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of tal@whatexit.org designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::a33 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=tal@whatexit.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.47 / 15.00]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[whatexit.org:s=google]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.999]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.97)[-0.968]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[whatexit.org]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(1.00)[1.000]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[whatexit.org:+]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::a33:from]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2021 16:11:26 -0000 What is the purpose of the "fourandsix" account? I noticed this account on a FreeBSD 12.2-RELEASE machine: fourandsix:[redacted]:6644:6644::0:0:IPv6 user:/home/fourandsix:/bin/bash However I can't find which package created it or what its purpose is. It was created around April 2021, which I believe is when I upgraded to FreeBSD 12.2. Thanks in advance, Tom -- Blog: http://EverythingSysadmin.com/ Rants: https://www.yesthatblog.com/ From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat Aug 14 16:14:36 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5DB366F6E7 for ; Sat, 14 Aug 2021 16:14:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@qeng-ho.org) Received: from mailout.qeng-ho.org (mailout.qeng-ho.org [217.155.128.244]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Gn5975JXzz4TNd for ; Sat, 14 Aug 2021 16:14:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@qeng-ho.org) Received: from arthur.home.qeng-ho.org (unknown [IPv6:2a02:8010:64c9:1::2]) by mailout.qeng-ho.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4634B55174; Sat, 14 Aug 2021 17:14:28 +0100 (BST) Subject: Re: What is the "fourandsix" user? To: Tom Limoncelli , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: From: Arthur Chance Message-ID: Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2021 17:14:11 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Gn5975JXzz4TNd X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of freebsd@qeng-ho.org designates 217.155.128.244 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=freebsd@qeng-ho.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.30 / 15.00]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:217.155.128.240/29]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[qeng-ho.org]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(1.00)[0.997]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:13037, ipnet:217.155.0.0/16, country:GB]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2021 16:14:36 -0000 On 14/08/2021 17:11, Tom Limoncelli wrote: > What is the purpose of the "fourandsix" account? > > I noticed this account on a FreeBSD 12.2-RELEASE machine: > > fourandsix:[redacted]:6644:6644::0:0:IPv6 user:/home/fourandsix:/bin/bash > > However I can't find which package created it or what its purpose is. > It was created around April 2021, which I believe is when I upgraded > to FreeBSD 12.2. It's not on my 12.2 systems so not a feature of the base OS. -- Nothing teaches one not to try to stamp out burning thermite quite like real-life experience. — James Davis Nicoll From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat Aug 14 16:33:20 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E7D066F994 for ; Sat, 14 Aug 2021 16:33:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pprocacci@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pj1-x1031.google.com (mail-pj1-x1031.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1031]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Gn5Zl31Ncz4VLw for ; Sat, 14 Aug 2021 16:33:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pprocacci@gmail.com) Received: by mail-pj1-x1031.google.com with SMTP id a8so19890314pjk.4 for ; Sat, 14 Aug 2021 09:33:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=cmcrZm8pU0YKYpoZerven53C4hU4wd1Zxuz+y2NEYik=; b=vGYGsKaxcBniOw0If3ewywVOwCOkef5LMX7VbVxYWLzrUJvzIg4DafpoF1p7s34rmj YFnCezHJQP7w2/8jKjYSWIlykJ1MOhXy9n/D5gtV0BXV2GQOJQjQxPy1c18uKFiI7xHH RNmtLemx1ENOF/ST3pcDWxQyRu0RU3OKbM8jDHd0uHB3CYDKm/F4aZkFbdt7bQ5vkb1C hkAmYgq7VVt7w8xICaPzaZ98wVyNoVe2Impsg+DKvWIMd8yFzzWFNEQTHtDbWdh03k8b UGU/n5u86aDKAckoTDWvbf+J6GV+JZ2tckBXqW/wY/bY5gq9lbjpuUa0k0iCxWdH9NbF Ha3w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=cmcrZm8pU0YKYpoZerven53C4hU4wd1Zxuz+y2NEYik=; b=Hb2W4vPyFw3lciFE160QeTry82TvDY9VAA+IrhXWuGulpBxU+ELr2BgjnG9PAHIplJ atHf3En9VZeov1/ABZt+WXLoneD09GuYrAdYS0ZLOqC/l//9mIHmyYDmrM0uKEUv0d0P ol8a8b0NO2CEAqm4Q0P7zjzuY3WsysJdE8ls0LOm+qrVZADL4+as0JZGLNreXYpxpb6J 1iy1G9+HL8DXtvpmqf5LsT8qUjJh/2n6uL2o+/eZ6eFtg1DXcwLuOhC/BavwElw9sOpw ZxAPEm0H/JMH288xySrKo1Hc5O22ggTyoQKz5ns9wTByd9N2WAAHwEmetK6X7t0pmdCK fR5Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530ZrsQlwCQIhkQBgsmNxzM9AOM+h9mpF2enx+O3LE/AA4lNjZpe aAAWSHnSW93s7kI8Mf1sRIkC6nym4QZgZFmWDg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJymm0X7a7m85G0XjlrKE9rhNI+DaZFxuXCl77hMigWXuep9Xqow7SAbx+OD0E1LBKwUUd6zF7mCL9oDi2+pPXM= X-Received: by 2002:aa7:8b4c:0:b029:314:5619:d317 with SMTP id i12-20020aa78b4c0000b02903145619d317mr7865192pfd.60.1628958798447; Sat, 14 Aug 2021 09:33:18 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Paul Procacci Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2021 12:33:06 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: What is the "fourandsix" user? To: Tom Limoncelli Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Gn5Zl31Ncz4VLw X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=vGYGsKax; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of pprocacci@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::1031 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=pprocacci@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.00 / 15.00]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36:c]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROMTLD(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com:dkim]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(1.00)[1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::1031:from]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.34 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2021 16:33:20 -0000 Only thing I found interesting is: https://www.vulnhub.com/entry/fourandsix-201,266/ Have you been pwned? On Sat, Aug 14, 2021 at 12:11 PM Tom Limoncelli wrote: > What is the purpose of the "fourandsix" account? > > I noticed this account on a FreeBSD 12.2-RELEASE machine: > > fourandsix:[redacted]:6644:6644::0:0:IPv6 user:/home/fourandsix:/bin/bash > > However I can't find which package created it or what its purpose is. > It was created around April 2021, which I believe is when I upgraded > to FreeBSD 12.2. > > Thanks in advance, > Tom > > -- > Blog: http://EverythingSysadmin.com/ > Rants: https://www.yesthatblog.com/ > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- __________________ :(){ :|:& };: From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat Aug 14 18:45:21 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C0BE6513CA for ; Sat, 14 Aug 2021 18:45:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tal@whatexit.org) Received: from mail-vk1-xa31.google.com (mail-vk1-xa31.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::a31]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Gn8W445Xrz4cfP for ; Sat, 14 Aug 2021 18:45:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tal@whatexit.org) Received: by mail-vk1-xa31.google.com with SMTP id 139so3428343vkx.0 for ; Sat, 14 Aug 2021 11:45:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=whatexit.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=RSx+9VbsKYLaKMPiyunygof3Gfib7iPVVpb9B6R406U=; b=Upd2kTKuIwEsrcl6jOz8vL8+vF2eLXpVfeIQ9ykGtEko9HpIHC8OEPDkqFc3apXSb7 DbrR4qGWhrTX/pPgwZ2cHAw3cXRBvad8RhPQDbVvaev6mIoe9lq+RkeR0AJy4K/2ubCH 0/sWY08YcjSuyaVqzE0nfUP/hfQ+s94pxWx/c= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=RSx+9VbsKYLaKMPiyunygof3Gfib7iPVVpb9B6R406U=; b=sVONCfR+5OC2F89+kSnGjh6qKvAltzyooos5RSQxxfciDsMRhUZTfgNp3kle3PQwv7 3J+Av+1TGdtfMBIe0gzV3w/Zs5GfuW6JWBWvfPZj/yJXi2ZX9BzNo5oHaTyREUGJTMpf Xr1kLwlUr4gpA4CBWzdgsthBmG8MTXKeNUcLm2iIGma+yD25sDXs4jBvoyf+kCohm4F1 HIjHm8ZzmvEG8fiHisAIS4AD6WZQKmdVL86B7NUhv4dPLa+P8fsvi5cW7squmy3NGsRm 5uuQtmsSYSF6yDZxmEW4eoggXOQBrgBMFrSp2LJtQjN5Ei8uHC/KrC4r4tIZHJuELof1 uOHA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533kueHHmE3qvCXkqZX2UmGznjV6qpreGwUUfa0NkbUPMKFD5dqZ ZEzGv2FHZVlb0VSUJZimgkn2fXKLc9Hxs2njx3R0XQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw0G+THhYfdMn0utjJiWMZT6DRf00SiH2+AjJd1QKPWxjOzySBZRHmr/k64kJ8aXFOigHrV9+SXz/Ui6R8AYWo= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6122:d83:: with SMTP id bc3mr5673288vkb.3.1628966714147; Sat, 14 Aug 2021 11:45:14 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Tom Limoncelli Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2021 14:45:03 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: What is the "fourandsix" user? To: Paul Procacci Cc: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Gn8W445Xrz4cfP X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=whatexit.org header.s=google header.b=Upd2kTKu; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of tal@whatexit.org designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::a31 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=tal@whatexit.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.28 / 15.00]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[whatexit.org:s=google]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[whatexit.org]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[whatexit.org:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::a31:from]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.78)[-0.775]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[gmail.com]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2021 18:45:21 -0000 I wouldn't doubt it. On Sat, Aug 14, 2021 at 12:33 PM Paul Procacci wrote: > > Only thing I found interesting is: https://www.vulnhub.com/entry/fourandsix-201,266/ > Have you been pwned? > > On Sat, Aug 14, 2021 at 12:11 PM Tom Limoncelli wrote: >> >> What is the purpose of the "fourandsix" account? >> >> I noticed this account on a FreeBSD 12.2-RELEASE machine: >> >> fourandsix:[redacted]:6644:6644::0:0:IPv6 user:/home/fourandsix:/bin/bash >> >> However I can't find which package created it or what its purpose is. >> It was created around April 2021, which I believe is when I upgraded >> to FreeBSD 12.2. >> >> Thanks in advance, >> Tom >> >> -- >> Blog: http://EverythingSysadmin.com/ >> Rants: https://www.yesthatblog.com/ >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > -- > __________________ > > :(){ :|:& };: -- Email: tal@whatexit.org Work: tlimoncelli@StackOverflow.com Blog: http://EverythingSysadmin.com/