Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2023 07:03:45 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: gecko@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 260901] www/firefox dom.ipc.processCount, fission.autostart, dom.ipc.processCount.webIsolated, numbers of processes and impact on performance Message-ID: <bug-260901-21738-qNF37QXosE@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-260901-21738@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-260901-21738@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D260901 --- Comment #7 from Graham Perrin <grahamperrin@freebsd.org> --- Created attachment 242553 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D242553&action= =3Dedit Screenshot: 2023-05-28, fission enabled, dom.ipc.processCount.webIsolated 4 (the default) (In reply to Graham Perrin from comment #2) > =E2=80=A6 an effort to reduce the impact on performance, =E2=80=A6 >From <https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D1742892#c12>; (2021-12-= 07):=20 > =E2=80=A6 can't limit the total number of content processes Fission will = use,=20 > but you can limit the number of content processes Fission will use=20 > per site by setting the dom.ipc.processCount.webIsolated pref (the=20 > default is 4). =E2=80=A6 =F0=A0=84=A3=E2=80=93 and:=20 > =E2=80=A6 I think the memory overhead of each content process is only abo= ut=20 > 20 KB, so there is really not much benefit to decreasing=20 > dom.ipc.processCount.webIsolated. I don't intend to reopen this bug report, but I see nothing like 20 KB in t= he attached screenshot. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-260901-21738-qNF37QXosE>